[Federal Register: June 21, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 119)]
[Notices]
[Page 35652-35662]
[DOCID:fr21jn06-96]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[Docket ID Numbers EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0411 to 0418, 0420, 0421, 0425 to
0427, 0430 to 0434, 0437 to 0445, and 0447 to 0451; FRL-8185-7]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Request for Comments on
Thirty-Two Proposed Information Collection Requests (ICRs)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to submit the
following 32 existing, approved, continuing Information Collection
Requests (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the
purpose of renewing the ICRs. Before submitting the ICRs to OMB for
review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects of
the information collections as described under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 21, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or
through hand delivery/courier service. Follow the detailed instructions
as provided under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, section A.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The contact individuals for each ICR
are listed under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, section II.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. How Can I Access the Docket and/or Submit Comments?

1. Docket Access Instructions

    EPA has established a public docket for the ICRs listed in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION, section II. B. The docket is available for
online viewing at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at

the Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center (ECDIC),
in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading
Room is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566-
1744, and the telephone number for the Enforcement and Compliance
Docket and Information Center (ECDIC) docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use http://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft

collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.

2. Instructions for Submitting Comments

    Submit your comments by one of the following methods:
    a. Electronic Submission: Access http://www.regulations.gov and

follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    b. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    c. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
    d. Mail: Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center
(ECDIC), Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
Mailcode: 2201T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    e. Hand Delivery: Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information
Center (ECDIC), Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. Deliveries are
only accepted during the Docket Center's normal hours of operation, and
special arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
    Direct your comments to the specific docket listed in SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION, section II. B, and reference the OMB Control Number for
the ICR. It is EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at: http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal

information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The Web site, http://www.regulations.gov
, is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA

will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide
it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly
to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address

will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that
is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If
you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with
any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm
.

B. What Information Is EPA Particularly Interested In?

    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA), EPA is soliciting comments and information to enable it to:
    (1) Evaluate whether the proposed collections of information are
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
    (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimates of the burdens
of the proposed collections of information.
    (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected.
    (4) Minimize the burden of the collections of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
or electronic collection technologies or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

C. What Should I Consider When I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

ICRs To Be Renewed

A. For All ICRs

    The Agency computed the burden for each of the recordkeeping and
reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the currently
approved ICRs listed in this notice. Where applicable, the Agency
identified specific tasks and made assumptions, while being consistent
with the concept of the PRA.
    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions to; develop, acquire, install, and
utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting,
validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining
information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be
able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information.
    The listed ICRs address Clean Air Act information collection
requirements in standards (i.e., regulations) that have mandatory
recordkeeping and reporting requirements. Records collected under the
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) must be retained by the owner
or operator for at least two years and the records collected under the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) must
be retained by the owner or operator for at least five years. In
general, the required collections consist of emissions data and other
information deemed not to be private.
    In the absence of such information collection requirements,
enforcement personnel would be unable to determine whether the
standards are being met on a continuous basis as required by the Clean
Air Act.
    An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information, unless the Agency displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations under Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations are
published in the Federal Register, or on the related collection
instrument or form. The display of OMB control numbers for certain EPA
regulations is consolidated at 40 CFR part 9.

B. What Information Collection Activity or ICR Does This Apply to?

    In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq.), this notice announces that EPA is planning to submit the
following 32 existing, approved, continuing Information Collection
Requests (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB):
    (1) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0452.
    Title: NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40
CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1969.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0533.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2006.
    (2) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0441.
    Title: NESHAP for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities (40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart M).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1415.07, OMB Control Number 2060-0234.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2006.
    (3) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0439.
    Title: NSPS for Phosphate Fertilizer Industry (40 CFR Part 60,
Subparts T, U, V, W and X).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1061.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0037.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006.
    (4) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0448.
    Title: NSPS for Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnace and Argon Oxygen
Decarbonization Vessels (40 CFR Part 60, Subparts AA and AAa).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1060.14, OMB Control Number 2060-0038.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006.
    (5) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0425.
    Title: NSPS for Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Steam
Generating Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1088.11, OMB Control Number 2060-0072.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006.
    (6) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0426.
    Title: NSPS for Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generating Units (40 CFR
Part 60, Subpart D).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1052.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0026.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006.
    (7) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0417.
    Title: NSPS for Surfacing Coating of Plastic Parts for Business
Machines (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TTT).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1093.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0162.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006.
    (8) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0440.
    Title: Federal Emission Guidelines for Existing Municipal Solid
Waste Landfills (40 CFR Part 62, Subpart GGG).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1893.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0430.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006.
    (9) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0427.
    Title: NSPS for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing (40 CFR Part 60,
Subpart OOO).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1084.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0050.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006.
    (10) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0413.
    Title: NSPS for Secondary Lead Smelters (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart
L).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1128.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0080.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2006.
    (11) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0445.

    Title: NESHAP Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2062.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0534.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2006.
    (12) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0450.
    Title: NESHAP for the Secondary Lead Industry (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart X).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1686.06, OMB Control Number 2060-0296.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2006.
    (13) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0421.
    Title: NESHAP for Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart IIIII).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2046.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0542.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2007.
    (14) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0447.
    Title: NESHAP for Iron and Steel Foundries (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
EEEEE).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2096.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0543.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2007.
    (15) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0431.
    Title: NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
AAAAA).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2072.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0544.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2007.
    (16) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0432.
    Title: NESHAP for Primary Magnesium Refining (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart TTTTT).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2098.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0536.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2007.
    (17) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0433.
    Title: NESHAP for Plastic Parts and Products Surface Coating (40
CFR Part 63, Subpart PPPP).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2044.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0537.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2007.
    (18) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0430.
    Title: NESHAP for Taconite Iron Ore Processing (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart RRRRR).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2050.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0538.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2007.
    (19) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0438.
    Title: NESHAP for Printing and Publishing Industry (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart KK).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1739.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0335.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2007.
    (20) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0412.
    Title: NSPS for Ammonium Sulfate Manufacturing Plants 40 CFR Part
60, Subpart PP).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1066.06, OMB Control Number 2060-0032.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on February 28, 2007.
    (21) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0414.
    Title: NSPS for Pressure Sensitive Tape and Label Surface Coating
Operations (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart RR).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 0658.09, OMB Control Number 2060-0004.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on February 28, 2007.
    (22) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0416.
    Title: NSPS for Automobile and Light Duty Truck Surface Coating
Operations (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart MM).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1064.11, OMB Control Number 2060-0034.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on February 28, 2007.
    (23) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0411.
    Title: NSPS for Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coating and Printing
(40 CFR Part 60, Subpart FFF).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1157.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0073.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on February 28, 2007.
    (24) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0420.
    Title: NSPS for Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing Plants (40
CFR Part 60, Subpart PPP and 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart NNN).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1160.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0114.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on February 28, 2007.
    (25) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0415.
    Title: NSPS for Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 60,
Subpart KK).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1072.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0081.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on March 31, 2007.
    (26) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0449.
    Title: NSPS for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which
Construction, Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After June 11,
1973 prior to July 23, 1984 (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1797.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0442.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on March 31, 2007.
    (27) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0442.
    Title: NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration
Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC)
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1926.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0450.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on March 31, 2007.
    (28) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0418.
    Title: NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing (40 CFR Part
63, Subpart EEEE).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 2115.02, OMB Control Number 2060-0535.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2007.
    (29) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0451.
    Title: NESHAP for Organic Liquids Distribution (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart EEEE).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1963.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0539.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2007.
    (30) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0444.
    Title: Emission Guidelines for Commercial and Industrial Solid
Waste Incineration Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart DDDD).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1927.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0451.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2007.
    (31) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0443.
    Title: NESHAP for Halogenated Solvent Cleaners/Halogenated
Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart T).

    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1652.06, OMB Control Number 2060-0273.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2007.
    (32) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0437.
    Title: NSPS for Nitric Acid Plants (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart G).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 1056.09, OMB Control Number 2060-0019.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on April 30, 2007.

C. Contact Individuals for ICRs

    (1) NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart FFFF); Marcia B. Mia of the Office of Compliance at
202-564-7042 (phone) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (fax), or via e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1969.03; OMB Control Number 2060-

0533; expiration date October 31, 2006.
    (2) NESHAP for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities (40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart M); Learia Williams of the Office of Compliance at
(202) 564-4113 or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR
Number 1415.07; OMB Control Number 2060-0234; expiration date October
31, 2006.
    (3) NSPS for Phosphate Fertilizer Industry (40 CFR Part 60,
Subparts T, U, V, W and X); Learia Williams of the Office of Compliance
at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR
Number 1061.10; OMB Control Number 2060-0037; expiration date November
30, 2006.
    (4) NSPS for Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnace and Argon Oxygen
Decarbonization Vessels (40 CFR Part 60, Subparts AA and AAa); Maria
Malave of the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1060.14; OMB Control Number 2060-

0038; expiration date November 30, 2006.
    (5) NSPS for Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Steam Generating
Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db); Gregory Fried of the Office of
Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
EPA ICR Number 1088.11; OMB Control Number 2060-0072; expiration date
November 30, 2006.
    (6) NSPS for Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part
60, Subpart D); Gregory Fried of the Office of Compliance at (202) 564-
7016 or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1052.08;
OMB Control Number 2060-0026; expiration date November 30, 2006.
    (7) NSPS for Surfacing Coating of Plastic Parts for Business
Machines (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TTT); Robert C. Marshall, Jr. of the
Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1093.08; OMB Control Number

2060-0162; expiration date November 30, 2006.
    (8) Federal Emission Guidelines for Existing Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills (40 CFR Part 62, Subpart GGG); Learia Williams of the Office
of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1893.04; OMB Control Number

2060-0430; expiration date November 30, 2006.
    (9) NSPS for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing (40 CFR Part 60,
Subpart OOO); Gregory Fried of the Office of Compliance at (202) 564-
7016 or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1084.08;
OMB Control Number 2060-0050; expiration date November 30, 2006.
    (10) NSPS for Secondary Lead Smelters (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart L);
Robert C. Marshall, Jr. of the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER>
or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1128.08; OMB
Control Number 2060-0080; expiration date November 30, 2006.
    (11) NESHAP Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG);
Learia Williams of the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 2062.03; OMB Control
Number 2060-0534; expiration date December 31, 2006.
    (12) NESHAP for the Secondary Lead Industry (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart X); Maria Malave of the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER>
or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1686.06; OMB
Control Number 2060-0296; expiration date December 31, 2006.
    (13) NESHAP for Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart IIIII); Robert C. Marshall, Jr. of the Office of Compliance at
(202) 564-7021 or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR
Number 2046.03; OMB Control Number 2060-0542; expiration date January
31, 2007.
    (14) NESHAP for Iron and Steel Foundries (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
EEEEE); Maria Malave of the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 2096.03; OMB
Control Number 2060-0543; expiration date January 31, 2007.
    (15) NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart AAAAA);
Len Lazarus of the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 2072.03; OMB Control Number
2060-0544; expiration date January 31, 2007.
    (16) NESHAP for Primary Magnesium Refining (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
TTTTT); Len Lazarus of the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 2098.03; OMB
Control Number 2060-0536; expiration date January 31, 2007.
    (17) NESHAP for Plastic Parts and Products Surface Coating (40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart PPPP); Len Lazarus of the Office of Compliance at
(202) 564-6369 or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR
Number 2044.03; OMB Control Number 2060-0537; expiration date January
31, 2007.
    (18) NESHAP for Taconite Iron Ore Processing (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart RRRRR); Len Lazarus of the Office of Compliance at (202) 564-
6369 or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 2050.03;
OMB Control Number 2060-0538; expiration date January 31, 2007.
    (19) NESHAP for Printing and Publishing Industry (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart KK); Learia Williams of the Office of Compliance at (202) 564-
4113 or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1739.05;
OMB Control Number 2060-0335; expiration date January 31, 2007.
    (20) NSPS for Ammonium Sulfate Manufacturing Plants 40 CFR Part 60,
Subpart PP); Robert C. Marshall, Jr. of the Office of Compliance at
(202) 564-7021 or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR
Number 1066.06; OMB Control Number 2060-0032; expiration date February
28, 2007.
    (21) NSPS for Pressure Sensitive Tape and Label Surface Coating
Operations (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart RR); Robert C. Marshall, Jr. of the
Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 0658.09; OMB Control Number

2060-0004; expiration date February 28, 2007.
    (22) NSPS for Automobile and Light Duty Truck Surface Coating
Operations (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart MM); Robert C. Marshall, Jr. of the
Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1064.11; OMB Control Number

2060-0034; expiration date February 28, 2007.

    (23) NSPS for Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coating and Printing (40
CFR Part 60, Subpart FFF); Robert C. Marshall, Jr. of the Office of
Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
EPA ICR Number 1157.08; OMB Control Number 2060-0073; expiration date
February 28, 2007.
    (24) NSPS for Wool Fiberglass Insulation Manufacturing Plants (40
CFR Part 60, Subpart PPP and 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart NNN); Robert C.
Marshall, Jr. of the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1160.08; OMB Control
Number 2060-0114; expiration date February 28, 2007.
    (25) NSPS for Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 60,
Subpart KK); Robert C. Marshall, Jr. of the Office of Compliance at
(202) 564-7021 or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR
Number 1072.08; OMB Control Number 2060-0081; expiration date March 31,
2007.
    (26) NSPS for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which
Construction, Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After June 11,
1973 prior to July 23, 1984 (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka); Maria Malave
of the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1797.04; OMB Control Number 2060-

0442; expiration date March 31, 2007.
    (27) NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration
Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC); Learia Williams of the Office of
Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
EPA ICR Number 1926.04; OMB Control Number 2060-0450; expiration date
March 31, 2007.
    (28) NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing (40 CFR Part
63, Subpart EEEE); Robert C. Marshall, Jr. of the Office of Compliance
at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR
Number 2115.02; OMB Control Number 2060-0535; expiration date April 30,
2007.
    (29) NESHAP for Organic Liquids Distribution (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart EEEE); Marcia B. Mia of the Office of Compliance at 202-564-
7042 (phone) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (fax), or via e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1963.03, OMB Control Number 2060-

0539; expiration date April 30, 2007.
    (30) Emission Guidelines for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste
Incineration Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart DDDD); Learia Williams of
the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1927.04; OMB Control Number

2060-0451; expiration date April 30, 2007.
    (31) NESHAP for Halogenated Solvent Cleaners/Halogenated Hazardous
Air Pollutants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart T); Learia Williams of the
Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1652.06; OMB Control Number

2060-0273; expiration date April 30, 2007.
    (32) NSPS for Nitric Acid Plants (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart G);
Learia Williams of the Office of Compliance at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>EPA ICR Number 1056.09; OMB Control
Number 2060-0019; expiration date April 30, 2007.

D. Information for Individual ICRs

    (1) NESHAP for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing (40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart FFFF); EPA ICR Number 1969.03; OMB Control Number
2060-0533; expiration date October 31, 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of new and existing facilities that manufacture a
miscellaneous organic chemical and are located at, or are part of,
major sources of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions.
    Abstract: The National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Miscellaneous Organic Chemical Manufacturing
(40 CFR Part 63, Subpart FFFF) were promulgated on November 10, 2003.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of
NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to
the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart FFFF.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Potential respondents are owners or
operators of any facilities that engage in the manufacture of
miscellaneous organic chemicals and are classified as major sources
under section 112 of the CAA.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 57 hours per response.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 251.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 17,745.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $348,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $256,000 and O&M costs of $92,000.
    (2) NESHAP for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities (40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart M), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0441 EPA ICR
Number 1415.07, OMB Control Number 2060-0234, and expiration date
October 31, 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of dry cleaning facilities using perchloroethylene
as a solvent.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Perchloroethylene Dry Cleaning Facilities (40
CFR Part 63, Subpart M) were proposed on December 9, 1991, and
promulgated on September 22, 1993.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of
NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to
the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart M.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 42 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Perchloroethylene dry cleaning
facilities.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 34,240.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,537,784 .
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $53,000 which is comprised of no
annualized capital/startup costs and O&M costs of $53,000.
    (3) NSPS for Phosphate Fertilizer Industry (40 CFR Part 60,
Subparts T, U, V, W and X), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0439, EPA
ICR Number 1061.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0037, and expiration date
November 30, 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of wet-process phosphoric plant, each
superphosphoric acid plant, each granular diammonium phosphate plant,
and each triple superphosphate plant, having a design capacity of more
than 15 tons of equivalent phosphorous pentoxide
(P2O5) feed per calendar day.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Phosphate
Fertilizer Industry (40 CFR Part 60, Subparts T, U, V, W, and X) were
proposed on October 22, 1974, and promulgated on August 6, 1975.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of NSPS
at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the
General Provisions

specified at 40 CFR part 60, subparts T, U, V, W, and X.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 46 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Phosphate fertilizer industry.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 13.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,194.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $320,000 which is comprised of no
annualized capital/startup costs and O&M costs of $320,000.
    (4) NSPS for Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnace and Argon Oxygen
Decarbonization Vessels (40 CFR Part 60, Subparts AA and AAa); Docket
ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0448, EPA ICR Number 1060.14, OMB Control
Number 2060-0038, and expiration date November 30, 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of steel plants that produce carbon, alloy, or
specialty steels.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Steel
Plants: Electric Arc Furnace and Argon Oxygen Decarbonization Vessels
(40 CFR Part 60, Subparts AA and AAa) were proposed on October 21,
1974, and promulgated on September 23, 1975, and proposed on August 17,
1983, and promulgated on October 31, 1984 respectively.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of
NESHAP at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, or additions to
the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subparts AA and
AAa.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 315 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Plants with electric arc furnaces,
AOD vessels, and dust handling systems that produce carbon, alloy, or
specialty steels.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 95.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 60,400.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $290,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $4,000 and O&M costs of $286,000.
    (5) NSPS for Industrial/Commercial/Institutional Steam Generating
Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Db), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-
0425, EPA ICR Number 1088.11, and OMB Control Number 2060-0072 and
expiration date November 30, 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
steam generating units with a heat capacity input greater than 29 MW
(100 mmBTU/hour).
    Abstract: This standard applies to owners or operators of steam
generating units that commenced construction, modification, or
reconstruction after June 19, 1984, and have a heat capacity input
greater than 29 MW (100 mmBTU/hour). The affected entities are subject
to the General Provisions of the New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, or additions to
the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Da.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 200
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Steam Generating Units with a heat
input capacity greater than 29 MW (100 mmBTU/hour).
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,230.
    Frequency of Response: Quarterly and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 591,389.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $26,775,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $9,000,000 and O&M costs of
$17,775,000.
    (6) NSPS for Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generating Units (40 CFR Part
60, Subpart D), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0426, EPA ICR Number
1052.08, and OMB Control Number 2060-0026 and expiration date November
30, 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
fossil fuel fired steam generating units greater than 73 MW (250 mmBTU/
hour).
    Abstract: This standard applies to owners or operators of fossil
fuel fired steam generating units that commenced construction,
modification, or reconstruction after August 17, 1971, and have a heat
capacity input greater than 73 MW (250 mmBTU/hour). The affected
entities are subject to the General Provisions of the New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and any
changes, or additions to the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR
part 60, subpart D.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 47
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Fossil fuel fired steam generating
units greater than 73 MW (250 mmBTU/hour).
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 660
    Frequency of Response: Semiannual.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 61,545
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $9,900,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $9,900,000 and no O&M costs.
    (7) NSPS for Surfacing Coating of Plastic Parts for Business
Machines (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart TTT), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-
2006-0417, EPA ICR Number 1093.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0162,
expiration date November 30, 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
business machine manufacturers.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for business
machine manufacturing industry were promulgated on January 29, 1988.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A
and any changes, or additions to the General Provisions specified at 40
CFR part 60, subpart TTT.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 35
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Business machine manufacturers
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 28.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, quarterly and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 978
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: There are no annualized capital/
startup or O&M costs associated with this ICR.
    (8) Federal Emission Guidelines for Existing Municipal Solid Waste
Landfills (40 CFR Part 62, Subpart GGG), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-
2006-0440, EPA ICR Number 1893.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0430, and
expiration date November 30, 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of existing landfills that handle everyday
household waste and were in operation from November 8, 1987 to May 30,
1991, or had capacity available for future waste disposition.
    Abstract: The Federal Emission Guidelines for Existing Municipal
Solid

Waste Landfills (40 CFR Part 62, Subpart GGG) were promulgated on
November 8, 1999.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of NSPS
at 40 CFR part 62, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the
General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 62, subpart GGG.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 68 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Existing municipal solid waste
landfills
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 173.
    Frequency of Response: Monthly, quarterly and annually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 11,678.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $242,000 which is comprised of no
annualized capital/startup costs and O&M costs of $242,000.
    (9) NSPS for Nonmetallic Mineral Processing, Docket ID Number EPA-
HQ-OECA-2006-0427, EPA ICR Number 1084.08, and OMB Control Number 2060-
0050 and expiration date November 30. 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
nonmetallic mineral processing plants.
    Abstract: This standard applies to owners or operators of new,
modified, or reconstructed facilities at nonmetallic mineral processing
plants that commenced construction, modification, or reconstruction
after August 1, 1985. The affected entities are subject to the General
Provisions of the New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR
part 60, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the General
Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart OOO.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 5.6
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Nonmetallic mineral processing
plants.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,825.
    Frequency of Response: Initial.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 31,026.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: There are no annualized capital/
startup or O&M costs associated with this standard.
    (10) NSPS for Secondary Lead Smelters (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart L),
Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0413, EPA ICR Number 1128.08, OMB
Control Number 2060-0080, expiration date November 30, 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
secondary lead smelters.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for the
secondary lead smelter industry were promulgated on July 25, 1977.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A
and any changes, or additions to the General Provisions specified at 40
CFR part 60, subpart L.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1.5
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Secondary lead smelters.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 25.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, on occasion and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 38.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: There are no annualized capital or O&M
costs associated with this ICR.
    (11) NESHAP Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart GGGGG),
Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0445, EPA ICR Number 2062.03, OMB
Control Number 2060-0534, and expiration date December 31, 2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of a site remediation activity.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Site Remediation (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
GGGGG) were promulgated on October 8, 2003.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of
NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to
the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart GGGGG.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 149 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Site Remediation.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 286.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, on occasion, monthly and
semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 341,737.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $2,522,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $1,239,000 and O&M costs of
$1,283,000.
    (12) NESHAP for the Secondary Lead Industry (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart X), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0450, EPA ICR Number
1686.06, OMB Control Number 2060-0296, and expiration date December 31,
2006.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of secondary lead smelters.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Secondary Lead Industry (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart X) were proposed on June 9, 1994, and promulgated on June 23,
1995.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of NSPS
at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the
General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart X.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 229 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of secondary
lead smelters.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 23.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 16,034.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $150,000 which is comprised of no
annualized capital/startup costs and O&M costs of $150,000.
    (13) NESHAP for Mercury Cell Chlor-Alkali Plants (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart IIIII), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0421, EPA ICR Number
2046.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0542, expiration date January 31,
2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
Mercury cell chlor-alkali plants.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for mercury
cell chlor-alkali industry were promulgated on December 19, 2003.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40
CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the General
Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart IIIII.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 248
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: mercury cell chlor-alkali plants.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 9.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 2,231
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $209,000, which is comprised of

annualized capital/startup costs of $87,000 and O&M costs of $122,000.
    (14) NESHAP for Iron and Steel Foundries (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
EEEEE), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0447, EPA ICR Number 2096.03,
OMB Control Number 2060-0543, and expiration date January 31, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of iron and steel foundries.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Iron and Steel Foundries (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart EEEEE) were promulgated on May 20, 2005.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of NSPS
at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the
General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEEEE.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 343 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of iron and
steel foundries.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 33.
    Frequency of Response: Semiannual.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 22,325
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $272,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $139,000 and O&M costs of $133,000.
    (15) NESHAP for Lime Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart AAAAA);
EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0431; EPA ICR Number 2072.03; OMB Control Number 2060-
0544; expiration date January 31, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of new or existing lime manufacturing plants.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Lime Manufacturing were promulgated on January
5, 2004. The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of
the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)
at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the
General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart AAAAA.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 45
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners and operators of lime
manufacturing plants.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 19.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, on occasion and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 7,766.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $377,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $171,000 and O&M costs of $206,000.
    (16) NESHAP for Primary Magnesium Refining (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
TTTTT); EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0432; EPA ICR Number 2098.03, OMB Control
Number 2060-0536; expiration date January 31, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of primary magnesium refining plants.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Primary Magnesium Refining were promulgated on
October 10, 2003. The affected entities are subject to the General
Provisions of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or
additions to the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63,
subpart TTTTT.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 122
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners and operators of primary
magnesium refining plants.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, on occasion and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 731.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: There are no annualized capital/
startup or O&M costs associated with this ICR.
    (17) NESHAP for Plastic Parts and Products Surface Coating (40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart PPPP); EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0433; EPA ICR Number 2044.03;
OMB Control Number 2060-0537; expiration date January 31, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
plastic parts and products surface coating operations.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Plastic Parts and Products Surface Coating were
promulgated on April 19, 2004. The affected entities are subject to the
General Provisions of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or
additions to the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63,
subpart PPPP.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 210
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners and operators of plastic
parts and products surface coating operations.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 203.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, on occasion and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 42,553.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $45,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $44,000 and O&M costs of $1,0000.
    (18) NESHAP for Taconite Iron Ore Processing (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart RRRRR); EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0430; EPA ICR Number 2050.03; OMB
Control Number 2060-0538; expiration date January 31, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners and operators of taconite iron ore processing plants.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Taconite Iron Ore Processing were promulgated
on October 30, 2003. The affected entities are subject to the General
Provisions of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or
additions to the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63,
subpart RRRRR.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 159
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners and operators of taconite
iron ore processing plants.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 8.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, on occasion and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,272.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $510,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $393,000 and O&M costs of $117,000.
    (19) NESHAP for Printing and Publishing Industry (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart KK), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0438, EPA ICR Number
1739.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0335, and expiration date January 31,
2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of the printing and publishing industry.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants

(NESHAP) for Printing and Publishing Industry (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
KK) were proposed on March 14, 1995, and promulgated on May 30, 1996.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of
NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to
the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart KK.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 100 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners and Operators of the printing
and publishing industry.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 352.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, on occasion and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 50,796.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $412,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $7,000 and O&M costs of $405,000.
    (20) NSPS for Ammonium Sulfate Manufacturing Plants (40 CFR Part
60, Subpart PP), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0412, EPA ICR Number
1066.06, OMB Control Number 2060-0032, expiration date February 28,
2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
ammonium sulfate manufacturing plants.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for ammonium
sulfate manufacturing industry were promulgated on November 12, 1980.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A
and any changes, or additions to the General Provisions specified at 40
CFR part 60, subpart PP.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 91
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Ammonium sulfate manufacturing
plants
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 2.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 181.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: There are no annualized capital or O&M
costs associated with this ICR.
    (21) NSPS for Pressure Sensitive Tape and Label Surface Coating
Operations (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart RR), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-
2006-0414, EPA ICR Number 0658.09, OMB Control Number 2060-0004,
expiration date February 28, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
pressure sensitive tape and label surface coating operations.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for the
pressure sensitive tape and label surface coating industry were
promulgated on October 18, 1983.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A
and any changes, or additions to the General Provisions specified at 40
CFR part 60, subpart RR.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 35
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Pressure sensitive tape and label
surface coating operations
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 37.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, on occasion, quarterly and
semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 3,179.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $72,000, which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $7,000 and O&M costs of $65,000.
    (22) NSPS for Automobile and Light Duty Truck Surface Coating
Operations (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart MM), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-
2006-0416, EPA ICR Number 1064.11, OMB Control Number 2060-0034,
expiration date February 28, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
automobile and light duty truck surface coating operations.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for the
automobile and light duty truck surface coating industry were
promulgated on December 24, 1980.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A
and any changes, or additions to the General Provisions specified at 40
CFR part 60, subpart MM.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 745
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Automobile and light duty truck
surface coating operations
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 210.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and quarterly.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 156,362.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $93,000, which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $2,000 and O&M costs of $91,000.
    (23) NSPS for Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coating and Printing (40
CFR Part 60, Subpart FFF), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0411, EPA
ICR Number 1157.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0073, expiration date
February 28, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
flexible vinyl and urethane coating and printing operations.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for the
flexible vinyl and urethane coating and printing industry were
promulgated on June 29, 1984.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A
and any changes, or additions to the General Provisions specified at 40
CFR part 60, subpart FFF.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 14
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Flexible Vinyl and Urethane Coating
and Printing operations.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 41.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 593.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $61,000, which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $7,000 and O&M costs of $54,000.
    (24) NSPS for Lead Acid Battery Manufacturing (40 CFR Part 60,
Subpart KK), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0415, EPA ICR Number
1072.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0081, expiration date March 31, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
lead acid battery manufacturers.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for the lead
acid battery manufacturing industry were promulgated on June 29, 1984.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A
and any changes, or additions to the General Provisions specified at 40
CFR part 60, subpart KK.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for

this collection of information is estimated to average 62 hours per
response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Lead acid battery manufacturers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 52.
    Frequency of Response: Initial.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 4,053.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $12,000, which is comprised of no
annualized capital/startup costs and O&M costs of $12,000.
    (25) NSPS for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which
Construction, Reconstruction or Modification Commenced After June 11,
1973 prior to July 23, 1984 (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka), Docket ID
Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0449, EPA ICR Number 1797.04, OMB Control
Number 2060-0442, and expiration date March 31, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of storage vessels for petroleum liquids for which
construction, reconstruction or modification commended after June 11,
1973 prior to July 23, 1984.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Storage
Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which Construction, Reconstruction or
Modification Commenced After June 11, 1973 prior to July 23, 1984 (40
CFR Part 60, Subpart Ka), were promulgated on March 8, 1974.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of NSPS
at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the
General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ka.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 3 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of facilities
that store petroleum liquids for which construction, reconstruction or
modification commenced after June 11, 1973, and prior to July 23, 1984.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 220.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 669.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $43,000 which is comprised of no
annualized capital/startup costs and O&M costs of $43,000.
    (26) NSPS for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration
Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart CCCC), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-
2006-0442, EPA ICR Number 1926.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0450, and
expiration date March 31, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of commercial and industrial solid waste
incineration units.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for
Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units (40 CFR Part
60, Subpart CCCC) were proposed on November 30, 1999, and promulgated
on December 1, 2000.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of NSPS
at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the
General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart CCCC.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 325 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Commercial and industrial solid
waste incineration units
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 30.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, annually, and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 16,899.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $18,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $13,000 and O&M costs of $5,000.
    (27) NESHAP for Miscellaneous Coating Manufacturing (40 CFR Part
63, Subpart EEEE), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0418, EPA ICR
Number 2115.02, OMB Control Number 2060-0535, expiration date April 30,
2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
miscellaneous coating manufacturers.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for the
miscellaneous coating manufacturing industry were promulgated on
December 11, 2003.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) at 40
CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the General
Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart HHHHH.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 84
hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Miscellaneous coating manufacturers.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 121.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 10,139.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $44,000, which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $10,000 and O&M costs of $34,000.
    (28) NESHAP for Organic Liquids Distribution (40 CFR Part 63,
Subpart EEEE); EPA ICR Number 1963.03; OMB Control Number 2060-0539;
expiration date April 30, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Owners or operators of organic liquids
distribution operations that are located at, or are part of, major
sources of hazardous air pollutant emissions.
    Abstract: The National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Liquids Distribution (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart
EEEE) were promulgated on February 3, 2004.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of
NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to
the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEEE.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 197 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of organic
liquids distribution operations that are located at, or are part of,
major sources of hazardous air pollutant emissions.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 381.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 137,170.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $1,800,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup cost of $264,000 and O&M costs of
$1,536,000.
    (29) Emission Guidelines for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste
Incineration Units (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart DDDD), Docket ID Number
EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0444, EPA ICR Number 1927.04, OMB Control Number 2060-
0451, and expiration date April 30, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
emission guidelines for commercial and industrial solid waste
incineration units.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Emission
Guidelines for Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units
(40 CFR Part 60, Subpart DDDD) were promulgated on December 1, 2000.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of NSPS
at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, or

additions to the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60,
subpart DDDD.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 262 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of commercial
and industrial solid waste incineration units.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 97.
    Frequency of Response: Initially, annually and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 72,423.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $99,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $87,000 and O&M costs of $12,000.
    (30) NESHAP for Halogenated Solvent Cleaners/Halogenated Hazardous
Air Pollutants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart T), Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2006-0443, EPA ICR Number 1652.06, OMB Control Number 2060-0273,
and expiration date April 30, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of halogenated solvent cleaners.
    Abstract: The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants (NESHAP) for Halogenated Solvent Cleaners/Halogenated
Hazardous Air Pollutants (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart T) were promulgated
on December 2, 1994.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of
NESHAP at 40 CFR part 63, subpart A and any changes, or additions to
the General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 63, subpart T.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 14 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of halogenated
solvent cleaners.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 1,431.
    Frequency of Response: Quarterly, semiannually, and initially.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 41,035.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $1,015,000 which is comprised of no
annualized capital/startup costs and O&M costs of $1,015,000.
    (31) NSPS for Nitric Acid Plants (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart G),
Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2006-0437, EPA ICR Number 1056.09, OMB
Control Number 2060-0019, and expiration date April 30, 2007.
    Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
owners or operators of nitric acid plants.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Nitric
Acid Plants (40 CFR Part 60, Subpart G) were proposed on August 17,
1971, and promulgated on June 14, 1974.
    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of NSPS
at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the
General Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart G.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average
approximately 25 hours per response.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Owners or operators of nitric acid
plants.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 24.
    Frequency of Response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,290.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $2,468,000 which is comprised of
annualized capital/startup costs of $68,000 and O&M costs of
$2,400,000.
    EPA will consider any comments received and may amend any of the
above ICRs, as appropriate. Then the final ICR packages will be
submitted to OMB for review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At
that time, EPA will issue one or more Federal Register notices pursuant
to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR(s) to
OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you
have any questions about any of the above ICRs or the approval process,
please contact the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Dated: June 12, 2006.
Michael M. Stahl,
Director, Office of Compliance.
[FR Doc. 06-5533 Filed 6-20-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


<!DOCTYPE html
     PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
     "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">

	<title>Minutes of the April 11, 2005 Exposure Modeling Public Meeting | Pesticides | US EPA</title>
	<meta name="DC.description" content="pesticide, pesticides,Access to and information regarding simulation models to predict pesticide concentrations in surface and ground water for use in both human health and aquatic ecological exposure assessments.  Exposure modeling public meeting products." />
	<meta name="keywords" content="EPA,Environmental Protection Agency, OPP, pesticides, pesticide, office of pesticide programs, scigrow, geneec, first, water models, exposure modeling public meeting" />

	<meta name="DC.title" content="Minutes of the April 11, 2005 Exposure Modeling Public Meeting | Pesticides | US EPA" />
	<meta name="DC.subject" content="EPA,Environmental Protection Agency, OPP, pesticides, pesticide, office of pesticide programs, scigrow, geneec, first, water models, exposure modeling public meeting" />
	<meta name="DC.type" content="" />

	<meta name="DC.date.modified" content="2007-06-07" />
	<meta name="DC.date.created" content="" />
	<meta name="DC.date.reviewed" content="" />

	<meta name="DC.language" content="en" />
	<meta name="DC.Creator" content="US EPA, Office of Pesticide Programs" />
	<meta http-equiv="Content-Style-Type" content="text/css" />
	<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" />
	<link rel="schema.DC" href="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" />
	<link rel="meta" href="http://www.epa.gov/labels.rdf" type="application/rdf+xml" title="ICRA labels" />

	<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" media="print" href="http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/s/print.css" />

Jump to main content.

Pesticides: Science and Policy

	<form id="EPAsearch" method="get" action="http://nlquery.epa.gov/epasearch/epasearch">

Recent Additions | Contact Us
			Search:
			<input type="hidden" name="fld" value="gov/pesticides/science,oppfead1/trac/science,oppfead1/carat,oppfead1/cb/ppdc/,gov/scipoly/sap,oppad001,pesticides/antimicrobials,oppbppd1/biopesticides/regtools/guidelines,oppbead1/methods,oppbead1/labs,oppefed1/models,opptsfrs/home,gov/scipoly/oscpendo,gov/PR_Notices" />
			<input type="hidden" name="areaname" value="Pesticides: Science and Policy" />
			<input type="hidden" name="areacontacts" value="http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/science/contacts.htm" />

			<input type="hidden" name="areasearchurl" value="http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/search.htm" />

			<input type="hidden" name="result_template" value="epafiles_default.xsl" />
 			<input type="hidden" name="filter" value="sample2filt.hts" />
			<input name="typeofsearch" id="EPAall" type="radio" value="epa"/>All EPA
			<input name="typeofsearch" id="Areaall" type="radio" value="area" checked="checked" />This Area
			<input name="querytext" id="searchbox" value="" />
		  <input name="submit" id="searchbutton" type="submit" value="Go" />

	</form>

You are here: EPA Home

Pesticides

Science & Policy

Models
            and Databases

Water Models

Exposure 		Modeling Public Meeting (EMPM) Information and Products

Minutes of the April 11, 2005 Exposure Modeling Public Meeting

Minutes of the April 11, 2005 Exposure Modeling Public Meeting

Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Conference Room 1126

1801 S. Bell St. - Crystal Mall 2

Arlington, VA  22202

On this Page

Attendees

Welcome and Introductions

On-going Action Items

Brief Updates

Major Presentations

Additional Discussion

Wrap up

Attendees

Name	Association

Betsy Behl	OPP/EFED

Ron Parker	 	OPP/EFED

Mark Corbin		OPP/EFED

Jim Lin		EPA/EFED

Nelson Thurman	 	EPA/EFED

R. David Jones		EPA/EFED

James Hetrick		OPP/EFED

Lucy Shanaman		OPP/EFED

Roxolana Kashuba		OPP/EFED

Bill Eckel		OPP/EFED

ED Fite		OPP/EFED

Loren Hall		OPP/EFED

Ted Kuchnicki		PMRA

Mark Russell		Dupont

Kathy Carr		Monsanto

Ian Chart		AMVAC

Mary Nett	 	WQC

Steve Cryer	 	DowAgro

Ian van Wesenbeek		DowAgro

Pat Havens	 	DowAgro

Russell Jones	 	BayerCropScience

George Sabbagh		BayerCropScience

Paul Hendley	 	Syngenta

Scott Jackson	 	BASF

Uwe Wanner		Crompton

Joan Gaidoz		Dynamac

Tom Gilding		CLA

Dave Valcore		Dow Agrosciences

Greg Leyes		ISKB

Bob Butz		Chem Rec Intl

Mark Cheplick	 	Waterborne Environmental

Cathleen Hapeman		USDA/ARS

Laura McConnel		USDA/ARS

David Sullivan		Sullivan Environmental

Rick Reiss		Sciences International

Natalia Peranginangin		Syngenta

Nancy Ragsdale		USDA ARS

Joe Albright		EPA OPP

Susan Hunter Yungsen		Bergeson and Campbell

James Cooper		FL Dept of Agriculture

Norman Birchfield		EPA OPP

Teleconference Link		California DRP

Top of page

Welcome and Introductions

Ron Parker (OPP/EFED) chaired the meeting in the capacity of co-chair of the EFED Water Quality Tech Team (WQTT). The next two quarterly meetings will be chaired by Marietta Echevarria, the other co-chair.

This meeting includes presentations which focus on the topic of  "pesticides in air". Issues addressed are:

 field estimation and computer simulation modelling of pesticide 	volatilization from soil,

 pesticides in air and rain water samples and

 development and usage of pesticide spray drift models.

All FIFRA EMWG agendas, minutes and presentations and be found at:

 http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/emwg_top.htm

Top of page

On-going Action Items from Previous Meetings

NAFTA Guidance for Conducting Terrestrial Field Dissipation Studies will be 	added to the EPA website when complete and approved

EFED will post revised surface water scenarios and list of those developed 	specifically for the OP cumulative assessment

ORD will post revised PRZM 3.12.2 on the CEAM website

Information on PRZM 3.12.2 revised volatilization feature will be included 	in the description of model changes

Top of page

Brief Updates

QA/QC of Pesticide Root Zone Model (PRZM) Version 3.12.2 (J. Hetrick)

EFED QA/QC team has looked at the emergence date and other variables to 	investigate a systematic error which had been seen in the output from the first 	year of runoff relating to planting date.  The detailed internal QA QC report on 	the new PRZM version is in progress. EFED will write up the issue for 	circulation and discussion on the list server.

QA/QC of EXPRESS (R. Parker)

The EXAMS-PRZM Exposure Simulation System (EXPRESS) and recently completed 	user's manual have been handed over by EFED contractor WEI to the ORD Center for 	Exposure Assessment Modelling (CEAM). CEAM is conducting a QA/QC review of the 	shell and revising the shell and user's manual where necessary. Revised versions of 	EXPRESS are posted on the CEAM website for testing and comment.

EXPRESS should not yet be used for regulatory submission of exposure assessments 	but instead still needs to be compared with output of other approved tools (e.g. 	PE4 or stand-alone PRZM).  Ron asked everyone to send all comments and suggestions 	to both ORD and to himself.

EFED is responsible for the scenarios used for modelling by the Agency, which 	are available in the EXPRESS shell. ORD is responsible for maintenance of the 	source code and for public availability. Betsy Behl agreed that EFED would 	circulate a list of key and supplementary PRZM/EXAMS scenarios via the list server.

Carbamate Cumulative Assessment (N. Thurman)

The report resulting from the February 2005 Carbamate Cumulative SAP meeting is 	expected soon; EFED will send notification via the EMWG list server when it becomes 	available.  The SAP provided valuable feedback that EFED will take into account in 	its ground water modeling efforts for the carbamate cumulative. New scenarios are 	being developed for the ground water modeling work.

Another SAP on the preliminary carbamate cumulative assessment will take place 	later this year, on the week of August 23-26. Based on that SAP and public 	comments, OPP expects to release the revised/final carbamate cumulative assessment 	by December.

Top of page

Major Presentations

Four presentations were made on estimation of pesticide volatilization from agricultural fields. The first was a presentation on methods of conducting field studies for developing input parameters for computer simulation modelling of volatilization from soil. The other three presentations discussed use of individual volatilization models that have been created to develop a better understanding of the data and how it might be further processed to make it more useful in risk assessments. Each of the three was presented to an OPP Science Advisory Panel meeting in 2004.

(http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/2004/september/meetingminutessept04.pdf

http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/2004/august2/aug2004final.pdf

 http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/2004/august1/august24transcript.pdf ).

All of the following talks will be posted on the EMWG website.

Presentation 1: Soil Fumigant Critical Input Parameter Selection for Air Dispersion Modeling, Ian van Wesenbeeck, Ph.D. - Dow AgroSciences

Summary: The goals of soil fumigant field studies and modelling are to develop a methodology to predict air concentrations for use in population-based risk assessment and to establish buffer distances. The modeling must account for variability in meteorological conditions and agronomic practices and include the incorporation depth, application type, rate and date. The study author's found that the flux profile is the most important input in air dispersion modeling because there is a direct correlation between flux rate and off-site concentrations.

Presentation 2: Fumigant Exposure Modelling System (FEMS): David Sullivan - Sullivan Consulting

FEMS was developed with several goals in mind. These were to

 seek accuracy in exposure assessment,

 base distributions of exposure on plausible cultural practice, maintain 	mass balance,

 provide risk managers with results that consider uncertainty in all key 	inputs, and

 to have a firm basis to establish margin in risk assessment process.

FEMS is a Monte Carlo based assessment tool which is based on two EPA models:  ISCST3 & TOXST. It addresses issues such as

 the need to account for the number of applications per year,

 irregular geometry of commercial fields,

 need to realistically address cultural practices such multiple-day 	sequential applications,

 need to address calm periods and

 recognizes that different seasonal issues need to be considered by region 	and by crop.

Presentation 3: Probabilistic Exposure and Risk model for FUMigants (PERFUM): Rick Reiss D.Sc. - Sciences International

The presentation included four elements:

 a description of the fumigant bystander exposure issue,

 a description of the PERFUM model,

 a demonstration of PERFUM with generic examples, and

 a discussion of the upper tail of the exposure distribution.

The PERFUM approach is to

 run ISCST3 with 5 years of historical meteorological data,

 generate a 5-year set of daily average concentrations (which is different 	than for a continuously emitting source),

 estimate concentrations in all directions around the field to develop the 	exposure probability and

 use the measured diurnal profile of flux rates in estimating exposure.

PERFUM capabilities:

Can input up to 15 days of flux data after the application and then models 	the changes in the buffer zone distributions with time since application and 	produces buffer zones for all distributions for each averaging period and each 	toxicity averaging time,

 Has a batch file system for multiple runs and can run up to 10 application 	rates simultaneously; this requires very little additional processing time for 	additional rates and is useful for developing buffer zone tables,

 provide outputs buffer zones on a monthly basis for seasonal analysis, 	yields a contour file which allows the whole field buffer zone to be plotted on a 	site map and has about 80 error messages to assure properly formatted input data 	and proper execution.

Presentation 4: Predicting Soil Fumigant Acute, Sub-chronic, and Chronic Air Concentrations Under Diverse Agronomic Practices: An overview of the SOFEA(c) System, Steve Cryer, Ph.D. - Dow AgroSciences

SOFEA possesses an intelligent input file generator and output depository for agronomic use of Gaussian Plume models.  It uses MS Excel as a Graphical User Interface and includes Crystal Ball 2000 Pro for stochastic functionality (Monte Carlo). It combines a number of features:

 simulation of a variety of agronomic practices,

 use of GIS representations of data,

 complex spatial analysis, and

 exceedence probabilities format for outputs.

SOFEA capabilities are as follows:

 It automates complex process for developing inputs, executing, and 	summarizing necessary inputs for USEPA air dispersion model,

 It allows specification of up to 5 different unique cropping patterns,

 fields can be either randomly placed within township or by section 	weighting and the percent of field re-treatment from year to year is user-	specified,

 It permits heterogeneous variable township use,

 It provides an option to incorporate GIS data,

 It includes land use, population, elevation and regionally specific weather 	patterns,

 It permits the possibility of forecasting along with BMP "what-	if" simulations,

 the system is written entirely in VBA (with exception of ISCST3 and one 	FORTRAN optimization module) and runs on a standard PC that has sufficient memory 	and disk space,

 has a solid Framework for easy expansion of functionality, and

 the results are of the same order as large-scale monitoring observations

Presentation 5: Environmental and Agricultural Factors Controlling Pesticide Volatilization, Transport, and Deposition - Laura McConnell, Ph.D. USDA/ARS Beltsville, MD

Dr McConnell's presentation included

 a description of chemical factors influencing volatilization,

 a summary of atmospheric transport and deposition processes,

 results from work in the Chesapeake Bay region for both pesticides and 	Polybrominated Diphenylethers (PBDEs) and

 a look at new directions in the work.

Volatilization is important for several reasons:

 active ingredient moves off-target, reducing product effectiveness,

 potential human health risk to workers and nearby residents, and

 increases exposure to sensitive wildlife populations.

 Factors effecting availability for volatile loss include:

 affinity for organic carbon; octanol/water partition coefficient (Kow	) reduces leaching in high OC soils,

 strong and weak molecular interactions with soil surfaces; this is 	generally more important under dry soil conditions,

 susceptibility to microbial degradation in soil which generally increases 	with repeated applications and

 photodegradation, which is only important for photosensitive chemicals at 	soil or plant surface.

Persistence in the atmosphere is governed by

susceptibility to direct or indirect photoreactions, i.e. hydroxyl radical 	(OH), nitrate radicals (NO3), or ozone (O3),

 octanol/air partition coefficient (KOA) which governs vapor-particle 	partitioning,

 Henry's law constant,

 particulate concentrations in air and

 frequency of precipitation events.

The presentation described detection in rainfall and detections in air for several chemicals in relationship to agricultural activity in the Delmarva Peninsula.

Upcoming work includes

 developing tools to predict atmospheric fate of VOC and odorant emissions 	from agricultural operations,

 determination of ozone creation potentials for pesticide formulation 	products and emissions from animal operations based on atmospheric chemical 	reactivity, and

 transfer this information to customer groups for use in the development of 	improved air quality management strategies.

Presentation 6: EFED Spray Drift Modeling Activities: Norm Birchfield, Ph.D - OPP/EFED

An EFED specific model, RegDISP is being developed by Milt Teske at Continuum Dynamics and a beta version is already in house at EPA; QA/QC will be conducted later.  This shell does not have all the tools available in AgDISP and/or AgDRIFT and has a simple appearance.  The options available to the user include those that would be expected to be used most frequently in typical screening-level spray drift assessments.

This interface will provide another front end option for drift models using the AGDISP core computational code; however, there are no plans as yet for this to become the sole interface.  Norm stated that EFED will continue to leave options open for selection of models for use in spray drift related exposure assessments.  The best model for the assessment at hand should always be used.

Norm then discussed the "mechanistic" ground boom model which was recently incorporated into AGDISP version 8.13.  The new ground boom model was adapted from the Lagrangian approach used in the aerial parts of AGDISP and AgDRIFT but without some of the aircraft wake aspects.  The new ground boom model has been shown to compare well with the SDTF field data; but Norm has some concerns that there is some temperature dependence leading to over-prediction at low temperatures.  Comparisons of the predictions of the mechanistic ground boom model with Tom Wolfe's Canadian drift data and the European data sets are planned.

Norm also announced that work has been under way to link the new RegDISP interface to the EFED PE4 shell, creating a PRZM/EXAMS/RegDISP interface.  This new interface offers options to add application efficiencies and drift values directly into the PRZM input files. New interface offers option to use daily wind speed /direction, temperature and RH as specified for the application day for each simulation.  A QA/QC process will precede any use of this version of PE4. Norm commented that this linkage is also expected to be developed for the EXPRESS shell.  EFED will discuss progress and implications at the next meeting.

Presentation 7: Drift Reducing Technology Project: Norm Birchfield

This presentation was authored by Norm B.; Jay Ellenberger and Gregory Sayles.  The Drift Reducing Technology project is an ORD-lead proposal to look at "what is needed to promote increased use of drift-reducing technologies (or DRTs)".  The project involves better understanding barriers to the use of DRTs and developing a process to overcome these barriers.  Proposed efforts include identifying/developing methods to verifying and quantify the drift reduction potential associated with the use of DRTs, the development incentives for DRT use on product labels, economic analysis of DRT use, and development of a technology transfer plan.

In a test pilot study for the DRT process air-assisted boom sprayers were identified as a promising DRT.   The rational for using air-assisted boom spraying (AABS) system included:

 relatively large body of performance data currently available,

 several companies produce AABS-type systems in the U.S., and AABS is a 	commonly used, economically viable DRT in Europe, but not in common use in U.S.

Potential benefits of using DRTs include:

 greater flexibility to ground applicators to meet or improve on drift 	requirements,

 may lower overall costs of spraying,

 supports private-sector technology development,

 minimizes impact of spraying on humans and ecosystems.

A draft DRT process has already been constructed, and a feasibility test of the DRT process using AABS is planned, but will require in-kind and real funding.

Presentation 8: AgDrift/AgDisp Modeling Issues: Dave Valcore, Ph.D. - Dow AgroSciences

The goal of the Spray Drift Task Force (SDTF) is to complete a final AgDRIFT regulatory version by 2006. Leadership is currently being transferred to Crop Life America (CLA) for drift modeling. Tom Gilding (of CLA) pointed out that he would be the point of contact for Industry responses on drift "issues" on behalf of the CLA Spray Drift Issues Team. User issues include

 bugs and glitches in both AgDRIFT 2.05 and AGDISP,

 details of version control and overall regulatory use of drift models,

 the AGDISP ground model, and

 question on science, validation bias, peer review, use in exposure 	assessments, ground model higher tier assessments, public stakeholder input, the 	USFS sponsored discussion session for planning future of drift modeling, a research 	/development version, the impact of and EPA DRT testing program, issues with Dept 	Home Security, release requirements and the need for a joint AGDISP/AgDRIFT 	security review.

The AgDRIFT website user version is AGDISP 8.03.

Future issues with the orchard option include:

 additional use patterns,

 a expanded database,

 higher tier and mitigation options,

 LERAP type approaches, and

 UK PACE vs TRV (tree row volume labeling).

Top of page

Additional Discussion

There is increasing concern of some industry modellers that once the scenarios are all working as intended (in terms of model input and soil related parameters), the output for erosion at certain sites can be seen to be developing unrealistic and unsustainable levels of erosion.  Industry will comment further via the listserver on the potential for over-prediction of erosion in certain standard scenarios

New Actions

EFED will post the list of standard and OP-only surface water modelling 	scenarios

EFED will notify listserver when the Carbamate Cumulative SAP report becomes 	available

EFED to make all air-related presentation materials available over EMWG 	webpage

EFED will provide update on RegDISP interface to modelling shells at the 	next meeting

Industry will comment via EMWG listserver on erosion predictions

All will suggest topics for next meeting

Top of page

Wrap-Up: Next Meeting

The group agreed that the next meeting should be held on Monday July 11th, 2005 with a strong plea to try to move it to Tuesday or Wednesday of that week (due to convenience for those who have to travel in the night before the meeting).  However since then an alternative date of Thursday 21st is being suggested as a way of avoiding the Monday meeting problem.

(Subsequent to the meeting , the next meeting date has been finalized as July 21, 2005)

Top of page

Local Navigation

Pesticides Home

Science & Policy Home

Advisory Committees

Policy & Guidance

Test Guidelines

Models & Databases

Laboratories

Analytical Methods Procedures

EPA Home

Privacy and Security Notice

Contact Us

Jump to main content.


[Federal Register: October 8, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 194)]
[Notices]
[Page 51904-51905]
[DOCID:fr08oc09-98]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60768; File No. SR-NYSE-2009-98]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by New York Stock Exchange LLC To
Discontinue Rebates Paid to Floor Brokers for Orders Swept Into the
Close

October 2, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on September 24, 2009, New York Stock Exchange LLC (the
``NYSE'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the

``Commission'') the proposed rule changes as described in Items I, II
and III below, which items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule changes from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to discontinue its current $0.0012 per share
credit applicable to executions by floor brokers at the close, with
effect from October 1, 2009. Going forward, floor broker executions
swept into the close will not qualify for a credit but will be free of
charge. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site (http://www.nyse.com), at the Exchange's Office of
the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The NYSE has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Currently, the NYSE pays a credit of $0.0012 per share to floor
brokers for executions swept into the close (i.e., orders executed at
the close other than market at-the-close and limit at-the-close
orders). Effective October 1, 2009, floor broker executions swept into
the close will no longer qualify for a credit but will be free of
charge. This is consistent with the treatment of all other orders from
Member Organizations (except for Designated Market Makers and
Supplemental Liquidity Providers) swept into the close, which are
currently free of charge but do not qualify for a credit.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 \4\ of the Act in general and Section
6(b)(4) of the Act \5\ in particular, in that it is designed to provide
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among its members and other persons using its facilities. The Exchange
believes that the proposal does not constitute an inequitable
allocation of dues, fees and other charges as it conforms the treatment
of orders from floor brokers swept into the close with that afforded to
all other orders from Member Organizations (except Designated Market
Makers and Supplemental Liquidity Providers) swept into the close.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purpose of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \6\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \7\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2009-98 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2009-98. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official business
days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also
will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of
the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NYSE-2009-98 and should be submitted on or before October 29, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-24262 Filed 10-7-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P