From: Donald Evans<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 09/27/2012 03:50 PM
Subject: RE: Offshore Operators Committee Comment Letter - Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

Yes, the practices stated in table 2d #1 (including the footnote: Sources have the option to utilize an oil analysis
program as described in § 63.6625(i) in order to extend the specified oil change requirement in Table 2d of this
subpart) will be appropriate for the larger engines.

From: Melanie King<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:31 PM
To: Donald Evans
Subject: RE: Offshore Operators Committee Comment Letter - Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708
Okay, thanks. So just to be clear, you're saying that the management practices in item #1 in Table 2d for
smaller CI engines would also be appropriate for the larger engines?

Melanie King
Energy Strategies Group
Sector Policies and Programs Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mail Code D243-01
RTP, NC 27711
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
 Donald Evans ---09/27/2012 01:24:54 PM---OK. I was unaware of that decision. In that case, the criteria
in 2d is preferred vs. the performanc

From: Donald Evans<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 09/27/2012 01:24 PM
Subject: RE: Offshore Operators Committee Comment Letter - Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

OK. I was unaware of that decision. In that case, the criteria in 2d is preferred vs. the performance standards.
Maintenance schedules already in place for these engines can be modified to incorporate the maintenance
frequencies stated in table 2d.

Don

From: Melanie King<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 12:12 PM
To: Donald Evans
Subject: RE: Offshore Operators Committee Comment Letter - Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708
Hi,
Thank you for providing this information. However, we cannot use "in accordance with manufacturer
specifications" as our standard. We got similar suggestions for the 2010 rulemaking and discussed why
we cannot use that for our standard. Below is an excerpt from the response to comment document
discussing the issue. This is on p. 238 of the document
(http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/rice/existing_si_rice_rtc.pdf).

"EPA does not agree with the commenters that it would be appropriate to simply specify that owners and
operators follow the manufacturers recommended maintenance practices for the engine. EPA
cannot delegate to manufacturers the final decision regarding the proper management practices
required by section 112(d) of the CAA; nor can EPA allow management practices to change
from engine to engine based on the views of multiple manufacturers."

Melanie King
Energy Strategies Group
Sector Policies and Programs Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mail Code D243-01
RTP, NC 27711
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
 Donald Evans ---09/26/2012 06:20:28 PM---Melanie, Per our phone conversation on Friday, Sept 14th, I
have some information I’d like to provid

From: Donald Evans<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 09/26/2012 06:20 PM
Subject: RE: Offshore Operators Committee Comment Letter - Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

Melanie,

Per our phone conversation on Friday, Sept 14th, I have some information I’d like to provide to you regarding the
subject comment letter and , more specifically, maintenance schedules for CI engines (> 500 HP) located on
offshore platforms and exploratory drilling rigs that may become subject to the Subpart ZZZZ area source standards.

Table 2d of the proposed rule specifies the following management practices for CI categories:
a. Change oil and filter every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first; [Sources have the option to utilize
an oil analysis program as described in § 63.6625(i) in order to extend the specified oil change requirement in Table 2d of
this subpart.]

b. Inspect air cleaner every 1,000 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary; and
c. Inspect all hoses and belts every 500 hours of operation or annually, whichever comes first, and replace as necessary.

Since the maintenance schedules vary from one engine manufacturer to another (i.e., Wartsila, Caterpillar, etc.) and
include the same items already provided in the rule above, requiring adherence to the manufacturer specifications
for these maintenance items will meet the intent of the proposed rule and help assure good engine performance.
a. Change oil and filter in accordance with manufacturer specifications; [Sources have the option to utilize an oil analysis
program as described in § 63.6625(i) in order to extend the specified oil change requirement in Table 2d of this subpart.][

b. Inspect air cleaner in accordance with manufacturer specifications and replace as necessary; and
c. Inspect all hoses and belts in accordance with manufacturer specifications and replace as necessary.

Even though these engines can range in size up to several thousand horsepower, maintenance items and engine
care are similar. Most engine owners will probably insist on following manufacturer specifications for engine
maintenance in order to fulfill warranty obligations.

I hope this provides a little more perspective for you from the operator’s view. Please reply or call me at your
earliest convenience if you would like to discuss further.

Donald P. Evans
Chairperson, Air Quality Subcommittee
Offshore Operators Committee

t:<PHONE_NUMBER>
m:<PHONE_NUMBER>
e<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
From: Donald Evans
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 4:21 PM
To: 'Melanie King'
Subject: RE: Offshore Operators Committee Comment Letter - Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

Hi Melanie. My schedule is open tomorrow, but I’m also available next week. Is there a particular day/time that
works better for you?

From: Melanie King<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:46 PM
To: Donald Evans
Subject: Re: Offshore Operators Committee Comment Letter - Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708
Mr. Evans,
I would like to discuss your comment if you have time. Is there a good time to call you?

Melanie King
Energy Strategies Group
Sector Policies and Programs Division
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Mail Code D243-01
RTP, NC 27711
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
 Donald Evans ---08/09/2012 03:09:53 PM---Melanie, Please find attached a comment letter submitted
to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708 from

From: Donald Evans<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To: Melanie King/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA
Date: 08/09/2012 03:09 PM
Subject: Offshore Operators Committee Comment Letter - Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708

Melanie,

Please find attached a comment letter submitted to Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0708 from the Offshore
Operators Committee regarding the proposed rule for NESHAPS for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines
published June 7, 2012.

If you need additional information or would like to discuss, please reply to this email or call me at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Sincerely,

Donald P. Evans
Chairperson, Air Quality Subcommittee
Offshore Operators Committee

t:<PHONE_NUMBER>
m:<PHONE_NUMBER>
e<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The information contained in this message may be CONFIDENTIAL and is
intended for the addressee only. Any unauthorised use, dissemination of the
information or copying of this message is prohibited. If you are not the
addressee, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete
this message.
Thank you[attachment "OOC Comment Letter_Docket id EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0708 _08-09-2012.pdf" deleted by Melanie
King/RTP/USEPA/US]


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 123 (Wednesday, June 26, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 38236-38240]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15283]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 123 / Wednesday, June 26, 2013 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0504; Airspace Docket No. 13-AEA-3]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Establishment, Modification and Cancellation of Air
Traffic Service (ATS) Routes; Northeast United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify two jet routes, six VOR Federal
airways, and three area navigation routes; to establish six area
navigation (RNAV) routes; and to cancel two VOR Federal airways in the
northeast United States. The FAA is proposing this action due to the
scheduled decommissioning of the Lake Henry, PA, VHF Omnidirectional
Range/Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) facility which provides
navigation guidance for portions of the affected routes. This action
would enhance the safety and efficient management of aircraft within
the National Airspace System.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 12, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2013-
0504 and Airspace Docket No. 13-AEA-3 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace Policy and ATC
Procedures Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2013-0504 and Airspace Docket No. 13-AEA-3) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2013-0504 and Airspace Docket No. 13-AEA-3.'' The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified comment
closing date will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, Room 210, 1701 Columbia Ave., College Park, GA
30337.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

Background

    The Lake Henry, PA (LHY) VORTAC facility is currently out of
service. A determination has been made to permanently decommission the
facility due to projected signal degradation from a planned power line
nearby. Additionally, the LHY VORTAC is not on the list of VORs planned
for retention in the VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON). As a
result, the ATS routes that utilize the LHY VORTAC must be amended. The
affected routes are: Jet route J-36 and VOR Federal airways V-58, V-93,
V-106, V-126, V-149, V-153, and V-408. With the decommissioning of the
LHY VORTAC, ground-based navigation aid (NAVAID) coverage is
insufficient to enable the continuity of all the airways. Therefore,
the proposed modifications to VOR Federal airways V-58, V-93, V-106, V-
126, V-149, and V-408 would result in a gap in the route structures.
Route segments supported by other NAVAIDs would be retained. Each of
these airways would have an RNAV T-route overlying its original track.
A portion of J-36 would also be deleted and replaced by Q-436. Although
not directly affected by the LHY VORTAC decommissioning, J-68 would be
amended to support the transition to RNAV and reduce chart clutter as
noted below.
    The FAA also plans to establish a new Waypoint (WP)/Intersection
(INT), named LAAYK, within 0.01 seconds of latitude of the LHY VORTAC's
position. The LAAYK WP (defined by lat. 41[deg]28'33'' N., long.
075[deg]28'57'' W.; or the intersection of the Wilkes-Barre, PA
037[deg]T/047[deg]M and Sparta, NJ 300[deg]T/311[deg]M radials) would
be utilized in a number of the routes described in this proposal.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to amend jet routes J-36 and J-68; VOR
Federal airways V-58, V-93, V-106, V-126, V-149, V-408; and RNAV routes
T-212, T-291 and T-295. The FAA also proposes to establish new RNAV
routes Q-436, Q-438, Q-440, T-216, T-218 and T-221. In addition, VOR
Federal airways V-153 and V-449 would be cancelled. The scheduled
decommissioning of the LHY VORTAC facility has made this action
necessary.
    The proposed route changes are outlined below.
    J-36: J-36 currently extends between Mullan Pass, ID (MLP) and
Sparta, NJ (SAX). The FAA proposes to eliminate the part of the route
between Flint, MI (FNT) and SAX. A new RNAV route, Q-436, is proposed,
as described below, that would replace the cancelled segment. Most
aircraft utilizing J-36 are RNAV equipped, so replacing the above J-36
segment with an RNAV route would further the transition to an RNAV
route structure and support the NextGen initiative.
    J-68: J-68 currently extends between Gopher, MN (GEP) and Dunkirk,
NY (DKK); and then between Hancock, NY (HNK) and Nantucket, MA (ACK).
Although J-68 is not directly affected by the planned LHY VORTAC
decommissioning, the FAA proposes to cancel that part of J-68 that
extends between FNT and DKK. J-68 overlies J-36 between FNT and DKK.
The proposed Q-436, Q-438 and Q-440 (see below), as well as other jet
routes, provide alternative routings through the area. Therefore
cancelling the segments of J-68 between FNT and DKK would support the
transition to RNAV and reduce chart clutter. The portion of J-68
between Hancock, NY and Nantucket, MA would be retained as currently
published.
    Q-436: This proposed new route would extend between the EMMMA, MI,
fix and the COATE, NJ, fix (approximately 8 NM NW of Sparta). Q-436
would replace the cancelled segments of J-36 and that part of J-68 that
extends between FNT and DKK. The proposed routing of Q-436 from the
COATE, NJ, INT/WP to a point southeast of DKK is an exact overlay of
the segments of J-36 proposed for cancellation (see above). From this
point Q-436 would continue westbound to provide a more direct routing
for aircraft transiting from the New York area landing in Chicago, IL.
    Q-438 and Q-440: During the development of Q-436, two additional Q-
routes (Q-438 and Q-440) were designed to segregate Chicago O'Hare
arrivals from other westbound traffic. Q-438 would extend between the
RUBYY, MI, WP and the RAAKK, NY, WP. Q-440 would extend between the
SLLAP, MI, WP and the RAAKK, NY, WP. From a point southeast of DKK, Q-
438 and Q-440 would diverge from Q-436 to provide segregation between
Chicago arrivals and aircraft overflying the Chicago area. Although not
directly related to the LHY VORTAC decommissioning, these additional Q-
routes would reduce ATC sector complexity, allow overflight aircraft to
be cleared to their cruising altitude more expeditiously and provide a
more direct routing to destinations west of Chicago; therefore, they
are included in this proposed rule.
    V-58: V-58 currently extends between the intersection of the
Franklin, PA, (FKL) 175[deg] and Clarion, PA, (CAV) 222[deg] radials
and ACK. The V-58 segments between Williamsport, PA (FQM) and the
HELON, NY, intersection (formed by the intersection of the Sparta, NJ,
018[deg] and Kingston, NY, 270[deg] radials) would be removed.
Following this gap, the airway would resume its current track between
HELON and ACK.
    V-93: V-93 currently extends between Patuxent River, MD (PXT), and
the United States/Canadian border, (near Princeton, ME [PNN]). As
proposed, V-93 would extend between PXT and the new LAAYK INT. The
segments between LAAYK, PA, and HELON, NY, would be deleted. The route
would then resume its current track between HELON, NY, and the United
States/Canadian Border.
    V-106: V-106 currently extends between Johnstown, PA (JST), and
Kennebunk, ME (ENE). V-106 would be realigned to the LAAYK INT in lieu
of LHY and that portion of the airway between LAAYK and Barnes, MA
(BAF) would be deleted. Following that gap, the airway would resume its
currently published track between BAF and ENE. This change is proposed
because other routings are available via other conventional airways (V-
34 from WEETS, NY, to Pawling, NY (PWL) then V-405 to BAF). The change
would also reduce chart clutter. As described below, T-212 would
replace the deleted segments of V-106.
    V-126: V-126 currently extends between the intersection of the
Peotone, IL (EON), 053[deg] and Knox, IN (OXI), 297[deg] radials and
Sparta, NJ. That portion of V-126 between Stonyfork, PA (SFK) and
Sparta would be deleted. The proposed RNAV route T-218 would overlay
the airway.
    V-149: V-149 currently extends between the intersection of the
Allentown, PA (FJC), 147[deg] and Solberg, NJ (SBJ), 227[deg] radials,
through the FJC VORTAC and LHY VORTAC, then on to Binghamton, NY (CFB).
V-149 would be modified by replacing the LHY VORTAC with the new LAAYK
INT (formed by radials from the CFB and FJC VORTACs). In addition, V-
149 currently utilizes the FJC 147[deg](M) radial to define the segment
between the MAZIE fix and FJC. This radial is currently charted as
``unusable.'' Therefore, the FAA also proposes to remove that segment
of V-149 between the MAZIE fix and FJC. The proposed T-221 would
overlie this removed segment as described below.
    V-153: V-153 currently extends between Lake Henry, PA, and
Syracuse, NY (SYR). The FAA is proposing to remove V-153 in its
entirety based on other available route alternatives and minimal usage
by air traffic.
    V-408: V-408 currently extends between the intersection of the
Martinsburg, WV (MRB), 058[deg] and Modena, PA (MXE), 258[deg] radials
and the intersection of the Lake Henry, PA, 056[deg] and Barnes, MA,
265[deg] radials (i.e., the SAGES fix). As proposed, V-408 would
terminate at Allentown, PA, and the segments between Allentown and
SAGES would be deleted. The deleted portion would be replaced by a
proposed extension of T-295, described below.
    V-449: V-449 currently extends between Milton, PA (MIP), and
Albany, NY (ALB). The FAA proposes to remove V-449 in its entirety.
With the LHY decommissioning, the remainder of the airway will not pass
flight inspection. A proposed extension of T-291 would replace this
airway, as described below.
    T-212: T-212 currently extends between the WEARD, NY, fix and the
Putnam, CT, VOR/DME (PUT). The FAA proposes to extend T-212 to the west
by adding segments between the existing RASHE, PA, fix (formed by the
intersection of radials from the Selinsgrove, PA, and the Philipsburg,
PA, VORTACs) and WEARD. As proposed, T-212 would replace the cancelled
segment of V-106 between the LAAYK and WEETS fixes.
    T-216: T-216 is a proposed new route that would extend between the
Philipsburg, PA, VORTAC (PSB) and the Nantucket, MA, VOR/DME (ACK). T-
216 would overlie V-58 between PSB and ACK, and would also replace the
cancelled portion of V-93 between the LAAYK INT and the HELON fix.
    T-218: T-218 is a proposed new route that would extend between the
Stonyfork, PA (SFK), VOR/DME and the Sparta, NJ, VORTAC (SAX). T-218

would replace V-126 between SFK and SAX.
    T-221: T-221 is a proposed new route that would extend between the
MAZIE, PA, fix and the Albany, NY, VORTAC (ALB). T-221 would overlie V-
149 between the MAZIE fix and Binghamton, NY (CFB).
    T-291: is a newly established route to become effective August 22,
2013 (78 FR 29615, May 21, 2013), extending between the LOUIE, MD, fix
and the Harrisburg, PA, VORTAC (HAR). After T-291 becomes effective,
this proposal would further extend the route northward between HAR and
ALB. The extended route would overlie V-31 to Selinsgrove, PA (SEG),
then proceed direct to MIP, and from MIP it would replace V-449 by way
of the LAAYK WP, terminating at ALB.
    T-295: T-295 is a newly established route to become effective
August 22, 2013 (78 FR 29615, May 21, 2013), extending between the
LOUIE, MD, fix and the Lancaster, PA, VORTAC (LRP). After T-295 becomes
effective, this proposal would further extend the route northward to
the Princeton, ME, VOR/DME (PNN). T-295 would overlie V-93 from LRP
through Wilkes-Barre, PA (LVZ), to the LAAYK WP and then would replace
V-408 from LAAYK to the SAGES, NY, INT/WP where it would turn and
overlie V-292 until the SASHA, MA, INT/WP. T-295 would then continue
northbound overlying V-93 to PNN.
    Where new navigation aid radials are cited in a proposed route
description, below, both True and Magnetic degrees are shown.
Otherwise, only True degrees are stated.
    Jet routes are published in paragraph 2004; high altitude RNAV
routes (Q) are published in paragraph 2006; VOR Federal airways are
published in paragraph 6010(a); and low altitude RNAV routes (T) are
published in paragraph 6011, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9W dated
August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 2012, which is incorporated
by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The jet routes, Q routes, VOR Federal
airways and T routes listed in this document would be subsequently
published in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under Department of Transportation (DOT)
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified
that this proposed rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it modifies the route structure as necessary to preserve the safe
and efficient flow of air traffic and to advance the use of Performance
Based Navigation technology.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9W,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012 and
effective September 15, 2012, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 2004 Jet Routes

* * * * *

J-36 [Amended]

    From Mullan Pass, ID, via Great Falls, MT; Dickinson, ND, via
Fargo, ND; Gopher, MN; Nodine, MN; INT Nodine 116[deg] and Badger,
WI, 271[deg] radials; Badger; INT Badger 086[deg] and Flint, MI,
278[deg] radials; to Flint.

J-68 (Amended)

    From Gopher, MI, INT Gopher 109[deg] and Dells, WI, 310[deg]
radials; Dells; Badger, WI; INT Badger 086[deg] and Flint, MI,
278[deg] radials; to Flint. From Hancock, NY; INT Hancock 082[deg]
and Putnam, CT, 293[deg] radials; Putnam; Providence, RI; to
Nantucket, MA.
* * * * *

Paragraph 2006 United States Area Navigation Routes

Q-436 EMMMA, MI to COATE, NJ [New]

EMMMA, MI                     FIX                 (Lat. 42[deg]53'04'' N., long. 084[deg]34'50'' W.)
YARRK, (Canada)               WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]31'22'' N., long. 081[deg]16'06'' W.)
CHAAP, (Canada)               WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]30'19'' N., long. 080[deg]40'57'' W.)
RAAKK, NY                     WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]23'59'' N., long. 078[deg]54'39'' W.)
HERBA, NY                     WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]14'35'' N., long. 078[deg]16'28'' W.)
LAAYK, PA                     WP                  (Lat. 41[deg]28'33'' N., long. 075[deg]28'57'' W.)
COATE, NJ                     FIX                 (Lat. 41[deg]08'10'' N., long. 074[deg]41'43'' W.)

Excluding the airspace in
 Canada.
Q438 RUBYY, MI to RAAKK, NY [New]
RUBYY, MI                     WP                  (Lat. 43[deg]01'04'' N., long. 084[deg]35'16'' W.)
Flint, MI (FNT)               VORTAC              (Lat. 42[deg]58'00'' N., long. 083[deg]44'49'' W.)
TWIGS, MI                     WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]48'34'' N., long. 082[deg]33'10'' W.)
JAAJA, (Canada)               WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]40'00'' N., long. 081[deg]16'00'' W.)
FARGN, (Canada)               WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]36'42'' N., long. 079[deg]47'18'' W.)

RAAKK, NY                     WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]23'59'' N., long. 078[deg]54'39'' W.)
Excluding the airspace in
 Canada.
Q440 SLLAP, MI to RAAKK, NY [New]
SLLAP, MI                     WP                  (Lat. 43[deg]27'00'' N., long. 084[deg]56'20'' W.)
Flint, MI (FNT)               VORTAC              (Lat. 42[deg]58'00'' N., long. 083[deg]44'49'' W.)
TWIGS, MI                     WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]48'34'' N., long. 082[deg]33'10'' W.)
JAAJA, (Canada)               WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]40'00'' N., long. 081[deg]16'00'' W.)
FARGN, (Canada)               WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]36'42'' N., long. 079[deg]47'18'' W.)
RAAKK, NY                     WP                  (Lat. 42[deg]23'59'' N., long. 078[deg]54'39'' W.)

Excluding the airspace in
 Canada.

* * * * *

Paragraph 6010 Domestic VOR Federal Airways

V-58 [Amended]

    From INT Franklin, PA, 175[deg] and Clarion, PA, 222[deg]
radials, via INT Clarion 222[deg] and Philipsburg, PA, 272[deg]
radials; Philipsburg; to Williamsport, PA. From INT Sparta, NJ
018[deg]T/029[deg]M and Kingston, NY, 270[deg]T/282[deg]M radials;
Kingston; INT Kingston 095[deg] and Hartford, CT, 269[deg] radials;
Hartford; Groton, CT; Sandy Point, RI; to Nantucket, MA. The
airspace within R-4105 is excluded during times of use.

V-93 [Amended]

    From Patuxent River, MD, INT Patuxent 013[deg] and Baltimore,
MD, 122[deg] radials; Baltimore; INT Baltimore 004[deg] and
Lancaster, PA, 214[deg] radials; Lancaster; Wilkes-Barre, PA; to INT
Wilkes-Barre 037[deg]T/047[deg]M and Sparta, NJ 300[deg]T/311[deg]M
radials. From INT Sparta 018[deg]T/029[deg]) and Kingston, NY,
270[deg]T/282[deg]M radials; Kingston; Pawling, NY; Chester, MA, 12
miles 7 miles wide (4 miles E and 3 miles W of centerline); Keene,
NH; Concord, NH; Kennebunk, ME; INT Kennebunk 045[deg] and Bangor,
ME, 220[deg] radials; Bangor; Princeton, ME; to INT Princeton
057[deg] radial and the United States/Canadian border.

V-106 [Amended]

    From Johnstown, PA; INT Johnstown 068[deg] and Selinsgrove, PA,
259[deg] radials; Selinsgrove; INT Selinsgrove 067[deg] and Wilkes-
Barre, PA, 237[deg] radials; Wilkes-Barre; to INT Wilkes-Barre
037[deg]T/047[deg]M and Sparta, NJ 300[deg]T/311[deg]M radials. From
Barnes, MA; Gardner, MA; Manchester, NH; to Kennebunk, ME.

V-126 [Amended]

    From INT Peotone, IL, 053[deg] and Knox, IN, 297[deg] radials;
INT Knox 297[deg] and Goshen, IN, 270[deg]radials; Goshen;
Waterville, OH; Sandusky, OH; Dryer, OH; Jefferson, OH; Erie, PA;
Bradford, PA; to Stonyfork, PA.

V-149 [Amended]

    From Allentown, PA; INT Allentown 358[deg](T)/008[deg](M) and
Binghamton, NY 144[deg](T)/154[deg](M) radials; to Binghamton.

V-153 [Removed]

V-408 [Amended]

    From INT Martinsburg, WV, 058[deg] and Modena, PA, 258[deg]
radials; Modena; Pottstown, PA; East Texas, PA; to Allentown, PA.

V-449 [Removed]

* * * * *

Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes

T-212 RASHE, PA to Putnam, CT (PUT) [Amended]
RASHE, PA               FIX                    (Lat. 40[deg]40'36'' N., long. 077[deg]38'39'' W.)
Selinsgrove, PA (SEG)   VORTAC                 (Lat. 40[deg]47'27'' N., long. 076[deg]53'03'' W.)
DIANO, PA               FIX                    (Lat. 41[deg]00'02'' N., long. 076[deg]13'34'' W.)
Wilkes Barre, PA (LVZ)  VORTAC                 (Lat. 41[deg]16'22'' N., long. 075[deg]41'22'' W.)
LAAYK, PA               WP                     (Lat. 41[deg]28'33'' N., long. 075[deg]28'57'' W.)
WEETS, NY               FIX                    (Lat. 41[deg]51'27'' N., long. 074[deg]11'52'' W.)
NELIE, CT               FIX                    (Lat. 41[deg]56'28'' N., long. 072[deg]41'19'' W.)
Putnam, CT (PUT)        VOR/DME                (Lat. 41[deg]57'20'' N., long. 071[deg]50'39'' W.)

T-216 Philipsburg, PA (PSB) to Nantucket, MA (ACK) [New]
Philipsburg, PA (PSB)   VORTAC                 (Lat. 40[deg]54'59'' N., long. 077[deg]59'34'' W.)
Williamsport, PA (FQM)  VOR/DME                (Lat. 41[deg]20'19'' N., long. 076[deg]46'30'' W.)
ELEXY, PA               FIX                    (Lat. 41[deg]25'54'' N., long. 076[deg]07'35'' W.)
LAAYK, PA               WP                     (Lat. 41[deg]28'33'' N., long. 075[deg]28'57'' W.)
HELON, NY               FIX                    (Lat. 41[deg]40'03'' N., long. 074[deg]16'50'' W.)
Kingston, NY (IGN)      VOR/DME                (Lat. 41[deg]39'56'' N., long. 073[deg]49'20'' W.)
MOONI, CT               FIX                    (Lat. 41[deg]37'53'' N., long. 073[deg]19'20'' W.)
Hartford, CT (HFD)      VOR/DME                (Lat. 41[deg]38'28'' N., long. 072[deg]32'51'' W.)
Groton, CT (GON)        VOR/DME                (Lat. 41[deg]19'49'' N., long. 072[deg]03'07'' W.)
Sandy Point, RI (SEY)   VOR/DME                (Lat. 41[deg]10'03'' N., long. 071[deg]34'34'' W.)
Nantucket, MA (ACK)     VOR/DME                (Lat. 41[deg]16'55'' N., long. 070[deg]01'36'' W.)

The airspace within R-
 4105 is excluded
 during times of use.

T-218 Stonyfork, PA (SFK) to Sparta, NJ (SAX) [New]

Stonyfork PA (SFK)      VOR/DME                (Lat. 41[deg]41'43'' N., long. 077[deg]25'12'' W.)
LAAYK, PA               WP                     (Lat. 41[deg]28'33'' N., long. 075[deg]28'57'' W.)
Sparta, NJ (SAX)        VORTAC                 (Lat. 41[deg]04'03'' N., long. 074[deg]32'18'' W.)

T-221 MAZIE, PA to Binghamton, NY (CFB) [New]

MAZIE PA                FIX                    (Lat. 40[deg]19'20'' N., long. 075[deg]06'35'' W.)
Allentown, PA (FJC)     VORTAC                 (Lat. 40[deg]43'36'' N., long. 075[deg]27'17'' W.)
LAAYK, PA               WP                     (Lat. 41[deg]28'33'' N., long. 075[deg]28'57'' W.)
Binghamton, NY (CFB)    VORTAC                 (Lat. 42[deg]09'27'' N., long. 076[deg]08'11'' W.)

T-291 LOUIE, MD to Albany, NY (ALB) [Amended]

LOUIE, MD               FIX                    (Lat. 38[deg]36'44'' N., long. 076[deg]18'04'' W.)
BAABS, MD               WP                     (Lat. 39[deg]19'51'' N., long. 076[deg]24'41'' W.)
Harrisburg, PA (HAR)    VORTAC                 (Lat. 40[deg]18'08'' N., long. 077[deg]04'10'' W.)
Selinsgrove, PA (SEG)   VORTAC                 (Lat. 40[deg]47'27'' N., long. 076[deg]53'03'' W.)
Milton, PA (MIP)        VORTAC                 (Lat. 41[deg]01'24'' N., long. 076[deg]39'55.W.)
MEGSS, PA               FIX                    (Lat. 41[deg]11'13'' N., long. 076[deg]12'41'' W.)
LAAYK, PA               WP                     (Lat. 41[deg]28'33'' N., long. 075[deg]28'57'' W.)
Delancey, NY (DNY)      VOR/DME                (Lat. 42[deg]10'42'' N., long. 074[deg]57'25'' W.)
Albany, NY (ALB)        VORTAC                 (Lat. 42[deg]44'50'' N., long. 073[deg]48'11'' W.)

T-295 LOUIE, MD to Princeton, ME (PNN) [Amended]

LOUIE, MD               FIX                    (Lat. 38[deg]36'44'' N., long. 076[deg]18'04'' W.)
BAABS, MD               WP                     (Lat. 39[deg]19'51'' N., long. 076[deg]24'41'' W.)
Lancaster, PA (LRP)     VORTAC                 (Lat. 40[deg]07'12'' N., long. 076[deg]17'29'' W.)
Wilkes-Barre, PA (LVZ)  VORTAC                 (Lat. 41[deg]16'22'' N., long. 075[deg]41'22'' W.)
LAAYK, PA               WP                     (Lat. 41[deg]28'33'' N., long. 075[deg]28'57'' W.)
SAGES, NY               FIX                    (Lat. 42[deg]02'46'' N., long. 074[deg]19'10'' W.)
SASHA, MA               FIX                    (Lat. 42[deg]07'59'' N., long. 073[deg]08'55'' W.)
Keene, NH (EEN)         VORTAC                 (Lat. 42[deg]47'39'' N., long. 072[deg]17'30'' W.)
Concord, NH (CON)       VORTAC                 (Lat. 43[deg]13'11'' N., long. 071[deg]34'32'' W.)
Kennebunk, ME (ENE)     VORTAC                 (Lat. 43[deg]25'32'' N., long. 070[deg]36'49'' W.)
BRNNS, ME               FIX                    (Lat. 43[deg]54'09'' N., long. 069[deg]56'43'' W.)
Bangor, ME (BGR)        VORTAC                 (Lat. 44[deg]50'30'' N., long. 068[deg]52'26'' W.)
Princeton, ME (PNN)     VOR/DME                (Lat. 45[deg]19'45'' N., long. 067[deg]42'15'' W.)

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 20, 2013.
Ellen Crum,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy & ATC Procedures Group.
[FR Doc. 2013-15283 Filed 6-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: June 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 114)]
[Notices]
[Page 33440-33441]
[DOCID:fr12jn08-82]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2008-0321]

Hospira, Inc., et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of One New Drug
Application and Two Abbreviated New Drug Applications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is withdrawing approval
of one new drug application (NDA) and two abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs) for edetate disodium injection. The holders of
these applications have agreed in writing to permit FDA to withdraw
approval of the applications and have waived their opportunity for a
hearing.

DATES: Effective June 12, 2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Florine P. Purdie, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6366, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3601.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA informed the holders of the following
applications that the agency believes a potential problem associated
with edetate disodium is sufficiently serious that the following drug
products should be removed from the market:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Application No.              Drug                    Applicant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NDA 11-355            ENDRATE (edetate          Hospira, Inc., 275 North
                       disodium) Injection       Field Dr.,
                                                Lake Forest, IL 60045-
                                                 5046
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANDA 40-376           Edetate Disodium          Apotex Inc., 150 Signet
                       Injection                 Dr., Toronto,
                                                Ontario, Canada M9L 1T9
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANDA 40-437           Edetate Disodium          Bioniche Pharma, 272 E.
                       Injection                 Deerpath Rd.,
                                                suite 304, Lake Forest,
                                                 IL 60045
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Edetate disodium is indicated for the treatment of hypercalcemia
and for the control of ventricular arrhythmias associated with
digitalis toxicity. Hospira, Inc. (Hospira), Apotex Inc. (Apotex), and
Bioniche Pharma (Bioniche) have agreed in writing to permit FDA to
withdraw approval of their respective applications (listed in the table
of this document), and to voluntarily remove their respective products
from the market, under Sec.  314.150(d) (21 CFR 314.150(d)).
    On January 16, 2008, FDA issued a public health advisory to alert
patients and healthcare professionals about important safety
information concerning the drug edetate disodium (see ``FDA Public
Health Advisory: Edetate Disodium (Marketed as ENDRATE and Generic
Products),'' available on the Internet at http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/
infopage/edetate_disodium/default.htm). As noted in the January 16,
2008, Public Health Advisory, there have been cases where children and
adults have died when they were mistakenly given edetate disodium
instead of edetate calcium disodium (calcium disodium versenate) or
when edetate disodium was used for indications other than those
approved by FDA. FDA asked Hospira, Apotex, and Bioniche to voluntarily
remove their products (listed in the table of this document) from the
market because of safety concerns.
    Hospira's NDA 11-355 for ENDRATE was initially approved in 1959
solely on the basis of safety. The 1962 amendments to the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) required that drugs be shown to be
effective as well. To accomplish this, FDA initiated the Drug Efficacy
Study Implementation (DESI) review to evaluate the effectiveness of
drugs that had been previously approved on safety grounds alone. In its
DESI review of edetate disodium, FDA concluded that edetate disodium
was effective for the treatment of hypercalcemia and for the control of
ventricular arrhythmias associated with

digitalis toxicity, the two approved indications for the drug (35 FR
437, January 13, 1970).
    In a letter dated September 17, 2007, FDA informed Hospira that the
agency was reevaluating the safety and efficacy of ENDRATE (edetate
disodium) Injection based on reports of fatal medication errors and
reports of serious adverse reactions associated with this product. In
its September 17, 2007, letter, FDA asked Hospira for additional
information related to the safety of ENDRATE (edetate disodium)
Injection.
    On September 19, 2007, FDA sent letters to Apotex and Bioniche for
ANDAs 40-376 and 40-437, respectively, requesting the same information
for generic versions of edetate disodium. In a letter dated October 1,
2007, Hospira provided the postmarketing safety information FDA
requested on ENDRATE (edetate disodium). In its October 1, 2007,
letter, Hospira stated that ``[b]ased on the limited indications for
ENDRATE (edetate disodium) and the availability of alternate medical
products that offer a superior risk-benefit profile,'' Hospira
determined that ``the product is not medically necessary.''
    In a letter dated December 7, 2007, under Sec.  314.150(d), FDA
asked Hospira to waive its opportunity for a hearing (otherwise
provided for under part 314 (21 CFR part 314)) to permit FDA to
withdraw approval of NDA 11-355, and to voluntarily remove ENDRATE
(edetate disodium) from the market. In a letter dated December 20,
2007, Hospira concurred with FDA's determination to withdraw approval
of NDA 11-355, ENDRATE (edetate disodium), under Sec.  314.150(d);
waived its opportunity for a hearing; and agreed to voluntarily remove
ENDRATE from the market. Hospira initiated a recall of the product.
    In separate telephone conversations on April 8, 2008, FDA asked
Apotex and Bioniche, under Sec.  314.150(d), to permit FDA to withdraw
approval of ANDAs 40-376 and 40-437, respectively, for generic versions
of edetate disodium, and to waive their opportunity for a hearing.
Apotex and Bioniche, in letters dated April 9, 2008, and April 17,
2008, respectively, agreed to withdraw their ANDAs under Sec.
314.150(d). Both Apotex and Bioniche indicated that alternative drug
products that offer a superior risk-benefit profile are currently
available for the approved indications for edetate disodium injection.
Both Apotex and Bioniche waived their opportunity for a hearing
(otherwise provided under part 314). In its April 9, 2008, letter,
Apotex stated it has never marketed ANDA 40-376. In its April 17, 2008,
letter, Bioniche agreed to voluntarily remove its edetate disodium
product from the market.
    Therefore, under section 505(e) of the act (21 U.S.C. 355(e)),
Sec.  314.150(d), and under authority delegated to the Director, Center
for Drug Evaluation and Research, by the Commissioner of Food and
Drugs, approval of the applications listed in the table of this
document, and all amendments and supplements thereto, is withdrawn (see
DATES). Distribution of these products in interstate commerce without
an approved application is illegal and subject to regulatory action
(see sections 505(a) and 301(d) of the act (21 U.S.C. 355(a) and
331(d)). On the basis of the circumstances described in this document
that led to the withdrawal of approval of the applications listed in
the table of this document, the agency will remove these products from
the list of drug products with effective approvals published in FDA's
``Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations,''
referred to as the ``Orange Book.''

    Dated: May 15, 2008.
Douglas C. Throckmorton,
Deputy Director, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research.
[FR Doc. E8-13273 Filed 6-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 214 (Thursday, November 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68532-68534]
[FR Doc No: 2015-28211]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC15-12-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-725); Comment
Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of information collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A), the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission or FERC) is soliciting public comment on the
currently approved information collection, FERC-725 [Certification of
Electric Reliability Organization; Procedures for Electric Reliability
Standards]. The Commission previously issued a Notice in the Federal
Register (80 FR 50846, 8/21/2015) requesting public comments. The
Commission received no comments on the FERC-725 and is making this
notation in its submittal to OMB.

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due December 7,
2015.

ADDRESSES: Comments filed with OMB, identified by the OMB Control No.
1902-0225 or collection number (FERC-725), should be sent via email to
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Attention: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission Desk Officer. The Desk Officer may also be reached via
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    A copy of the comments should also be sent to the Commission, in
Docket No. IC15-12-000, by either of the following methods:
     eFiling at Commission's Web site: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. For user assistance contact FERC Online Support
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.
    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and by fax at
(202) 273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: FERC-725, Certification of Electric Reliability
Organization; Procedures for Electric Reliability Standards.
    OMB Control No.:1902-0225.
    Type of Request: Three-year extension of the FERC-725 information
collection requirements with no changes to the current reporting
requirements.
    Abstract: The FERC-725 information collection contains the
following information collection elements:
     Self Assessment and Electric Reliability Organization
(ERO) Application: The Commission requires the ERO to submit to FERC a
performance assessment report every five years. The next assessment is
due in 2019. Each Regional Entity submits a performance assessment
report to the

ERO. Submitting an application to become an ERO is also part of this
collection.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Commission does not expect any new ERO applications to
be submitted in the next five years and is not including any burden
for this requirement in the burden estimate. FERC still seeks to
renew the regulations pertaining to a new ERO application under this
renewal but is expecting the burden to be zero for the foreseeable
future. 18 CFR 39.3 contains the regulation pertaining to ERO
applications.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Reliability Assessments: 18 CFR 39.11 requires the ERO to
assess the reliability and adequacy of the Bulk-Power System in North
America. Subsequently, the ERO must report to the Commission on its
findings. Regional entities perform similar assessments within
individual regions. Currently, the ERO submits to FERC three
assessments each year: Long term, winter, and summer. In addition, NERC
also submits various other assessments as needed.
     Reliability Standards Development: Under section 215 of
the Federal Power Act (FPA), the ERO is charged with developing
Reliability Standards. Regional Entities may also develop regional
specific standards. Reliability Standards are one of the three
principal mechanisms provided to FERC to ensure reliability on the
Bulk-Power System.
     Reliability Compliance: Reliability Standards are
mandatory and enforceable upon approval by FERC. In addition to the
specific information collection requirements contained in each
Reliability Standard (cleared under other information collections),
there are general compliance, monitoring and enforcement information
collection requirements imposed on applicable entities. Audits, spot
checks, self-certifications, exception data submittals, violation
reporting, and mitigation plan confirmation are included in this area.
     Stakeholder Survey: The ERO uses a stakeholder survey to
solicit feedback from registered entities \2\ in preparation for its
three year and five year self-performance assessment. The Commission
assumes that the ERO will perform another survey prior to the 2019
self- assessment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ A ``registered entity'' is an entity that is registered with
the ERO. All Bulk-Power System owners, operators and users are
required to register with the ERO. Registration is the basis for
determining the Reliability Standards with which an entity must
comply. See http://www.nerc.com/page.php?cid=3%7C25 for more
details.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Other Reporting: This category refers to all other
reporting requirements imposed on the ERO or regional entities in order
to comply with the Commission's regulations. For example, FERC may
require NERC to submit a special reliability assessment. This category
is mentioned to capture these types of one-time filings required of
NERC or the Regions.
    The Commission implements its responsibilities through 18 CFR part
39. Without the FERC-725 information, the Commission, ERO, and Regional
Entities will not have the data needed to determine whether sufficient
and appropriate measures are being taken to ensure the reliability of
the nation's electric grid.
    Type of Respondents: ERO and regional entities.
    Estimate of Annual Burden: \3\ The Commission estimates the total
Public Reporting Burden for this information collection as:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission defines burden as the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain,
retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal
agency. For further explanation of what is included in the
information collection burden, reference 5 Code of Federal
Regulations 1320.3.
    \4\ In all instances below where the number of responses per
respondent is ``1'' the Commission acknowledges that actual number
of responses varies and cannot be estimated clearly.
    \5\ Uses the weighted hourly average wage (salary plus benefits)
for electrical engineers and lawyers obtained from the Bureau of
Labor Statistics (data for May 2014, posted on 4/1/2015 at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm): $91.82/hour. The weighted
average used the following calculation: [(0.20) * ($129.87) + (0.60)
* ($66.45) + (0.2) * ($39.18)] = $73.68. $129.87/hour is the wage
for lawyers. $66.45/hour is the wage for engineers. $39.17/hour is
the wage for office and administrative support. Occupation codes are
23-0000, 17-2071, and 43-0000 respectively.

                                    FERC-725: Certification of the ERO; Procedures for Electric Reliability Standards
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Estimated
                                           Type of reporting                                 Number of     Total number   Average burden   total annual
          Type of respondent                  requirement         Number of  respondents   responses per         of       hours and cost    burden and
                                                                                respondent      responses     per response        cost
                                                                 (A)....................          (B) \4\   (A) x (B) =              (D)       (C) x (D)
                                                                                (C)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electric Reliability Organization      Self-Assessment.........  1......................               .2            .2            7,800           1,560
 (ERO) \1\.                                                                                \5\ $574,704        $114,941
                                       Reliability Assessments.  .......................              5.5           5.5           15,600          85,800
                                                                                \5\ $1,149,408      $6,321,744
                                       Reliability Compliance..  .......................                2             2           12,480          24,960
                                                                                \5\ $919,526      $1,839,053
                                       Standards Development...  .......................                1             1           28,080          28,080
                                                                                \6\ $1,865,916      $1,865,916
                                       Other Reporting.........  .......................                1             1            2,080           2,080
                                                                                \7\ $270,130        $270,130
Regional Entities....................  Self-Assessment.........  8......................               .2           1.6           16,640          26,624
                                                                                \6\ $1,105,728      $1,769,164
                                       Reliability Assessments.  .......................                1             8           15,600         124,800
                                                                                \6\ $1,036,620      $8,292,960
                                       Reliability Compliance..  .......................                1             8           40,560         324,480
                                                                                \5\ $2,988,461     $23,907,688
                                       Standards Development...  .......................                1             8            2,340          18,720
                                                                                \6\ $155,493      $1,243,944
                                       Other Reporting.........  .......................                1             8            1,040           8,320
                                                                                \7\ $135,065      $1,080,520
Registered Entities..................  Stakeholder Survey......  estimated 1,446........               .2           289                8           2,312
                                                                                \5\ $589        $170,221
                                       Reliability Compliance..  .......................                1         1,446              400         578,400
                                                                                \5\ $29,472     $42,616,512
                                      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Subtotals:
      ERO                                                                                * 142,480
      Regional                                                                        N/A                                                      * 502,944
      Registered                                                                                * 580,712
                                      ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Total Burden Hours...........                                                                                1,226,136 *
                                                                                ---------------
        Total Cost...................                                                                                $89,492,791
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* hrs.

    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Uses the hourly average wage (salary plus benefits) for
electrical engineers obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
(data for May 2014, posted on 4/1/2015 at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm): $66.45/hour. Occupation code is 17-2071.
    \7\ Uses the hourly average wage (salary plus benefits) for
lawyers obtained from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (data for May
2014, posted on 4/1/2015 at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm): $129.87/hour. Occupation code is 23-0000.

    Dated: October 30, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-28211 Filed 11-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 60 (Friday, March 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17337-17339]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06411]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2020-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2018]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before June 25, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA

Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2018, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after the FIRM
and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Iowa County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 17-07-0294S Preliminary Date: July 24, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Ladora.........................  City Hall, 806 Pacific Street,
                                          Ladora, IA 52251.
City of Marengo........................  City Hall, 153 East Main
                                          Street, Marengo, IA 52301.
City of North English..................  City Hall, 200 South Main
                                          Street, North English, IA
                                          52316.
City of Victor.........................  City Hall, 707 2nd Street,
                                          Victor, IA 52349.
City of Williamsburg...................  City Hall, 210 West State
                                          Street, Williamsburg, IA
                                          52361.
Unincorporated Areas of Iowa County....  Auditor's Office, 970 Court
                                          Avenue, Marengo, IA 52301.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Palo Alto County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 16-07-2362S Preliminary Date: June 27, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Curlew.........................  Town Hall, 102 Godwit, Curlew,
                                          IA 50527.
City of Cylinder.......................  City Building, 217 Main Street,
                                          Cylinder, IA 50528.
City of Emmetsburg.....................  City Hall, 2021 Main Street,
                                          Emmetsburg, IA 50536.
City of West Bend......................  City Hall, 301 South Broadway
                                          Avenue, West Bend, IA 50597.
Unincorporated Areas of Palo Alto        Palo Alto County Emergency
 County.                                  Management Office, 1907 11th
                                          Street, Emmetsburg, IA 50536.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Winneshiek County, Iowa and Incorporated Areas
         Project: 17-07-0397S Preliminary Date: January 15, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Calmar.........................  City Hall, 101 South Washington
                                          Street, Calmar, IA 52132.
City of Decorah........................  City Hall, 400 Claiborne Drive,
                                          Decorah, IA 52101.
City of Fort Atkinson..................  City Hall, 98 Elm Street, Fort
                                          Atkinson, IA 52144.
City of Jackson Junction...............  City Hall, 1201 County Road
                                          V68, Jackson Junction, IA
                                          52171.
City of Ossian.........................  City Hall, 123 West Main
                                          Street, Ossian, IA 52161.
City of Spillville.....................  Spillville Public Library, 201
                                          Oak Street, Spillville, IA
                                          52168.
Unincorporated Areas of Winneshiek       Winneshiek County Courthouse,
 County.                                  201 West Main Street, Decorah,
                                          IA 52101.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

             Wabaunsee County, Kansas and Incorporated Areas
         Project: 15-07-0283S Preliminary Date: October 25, 2019
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Alma...........................  City Hall, 326 Missouri Avenue,
                                          Alma, KS 66401.
City of Alta Vista.....................  City Hall, 521 Main Street,
                                          Alta Vista, KS 66834.
City of Eskridge.......................  City Hall, 110 South Main
                                          Street, Eskridge, KS 66423.
City of Harveyville....................  City Hall, 274 West Oak Street,
                                          Harveyville, KS 66431.
City of McFarland......................  City Hall, 518 Rock Island
                                          Road, McFarland, KS 66501.
City of Paxico.........................  Wabaunsee County Courthouse,
                                          215 Kansas Avenue, Alma, KS
                                          66401.
Unincorporated Areas of Wabaunsee        Wabaunsee County Courthouse,
 County.                                  215 Kansas Avenue, Alma, KS
                                          66401.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2020-06411 Filed 3-26-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19077-19078]
[FR Doc No: E9-9543]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP09-109-000]

Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC; Notice of Intent
To Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Kinder Morgan
Huntsman Storage Expansion Project and Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues

April 20, 2009.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of the Huntsman Storage Expansion
Project involving construction and operation of facilities by Kinder
Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC (Kinder Morgan) in Cheyenne
County, Nebraska. This EA will be used by the Commission in its
decision-making process to determine whether the project is in the
public convenience and necessity.
    This notice announces the opening of the scoping process we will
use to gather input from the public and interested agencies on the
project. Your input will help the Commission staff determine which
issues need to be evaluated in the EA. Please note that the scoping
period will close on May 20, 2009.
    This notice is being sent to affected landowners; Federal, State,
and local government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American Tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. State and local
government representatives are asked to notify their constituents of
this planned project and encourage them to comment on their areas of
concern.
    If you are a landowner receiving this notice, you may be contacted
by a Kinder Morgan representative about survey permission and/or the
acquisition of an easement to construct, operate, and maintain the
proposed facilities. The company would seek to negotiate a mutually
acceptable agreement. However, if the project is approved by the
Commission, that approval conveys with it the right of eminent domain.
Therefore, if easement negotiations fail to produce an agreement, the
natural gas company could initiate condemnation proceedings in
accordance with State law.
    A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' is available for
viewing on the FERC Web site (http://www.ferc.gov. This fact sheet
addresses a number of typically asked questions, including the use of
eminent domain and how to participate in the Commission's proceedings.
It is available for viewing on the FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov.

Summary of the Proposed Project

    Kinder Morgan proposes to construct and modify its existing
Huntsman Storage Facility. Kinder Morgan says that the completion of
the Huntsman Ridge Expansion Project would benefit the Rocky Mountain
region by meeting the immediate and long-term needs of the region as
well as providing flexibility in managing and storing gas supplies.
    Kinder Morgan is proposing to:
     Abandon in place two 1,200 foot sections of 8-inch
diameter pipeline;
     Install two injection/withdrawal wells;
     Rework two existing injection/withdrawal wells;
     Install various ancillary facilities including a 400 bbl
tank, pig receivers, a slug catcher, and a gas cooler; and
     Install 2,000 feet of 12-inch diameter pipeline.
    The general location of the project facilities is shown in Appendix
1.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies of all appendices are
available on the Commission's Web site at the ``eLibrary'' link or
from the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, or call<PHONE_NUMBER>. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
Copies of the appendices were sent to all those receiving this
notice in the mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If approved, Kinder Morgan proposes to commence construction of the
proposed facilities in October 2009, with an in-service date of mid-
year 2010.

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction and renovation of the Huntsman Storage Facility would
impact about 15.6 temporary acres where 0.8 acres would be permanently
impacted. All land disturbances would occur entirely on private lands.
    Kinder Morgan is proposing to utilize existing access roads for the
proposed project. No land disturbance would be required for additional
access roads.

The EA Process

    The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
to discover and address concerns the public may have about proposals.
This process is referred to as ``scoping.'' The main goal of the
scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the important
environmental issues. By this Notice of Intent, the Commission staff
requests public comments on the scope of the issues to address in the
EA. All comments received are considered during the preparation of the
EA. State and local government representatives are encouraged to notify
their constituents of this proposed action and encourage them to
comment on their areas of concern.
    In the EA we \2\ will discuss impacts that could occur as a result
of the construction and operation of the proposed project under these
general headings:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ ``We'', ``us'', and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Office of Energy Projects (OEP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Geology and soils,
     Land use,
     Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands,
     Cultural resources,
     Vegetation and wildlife,
     Air quality and noise,
     Endangered and threatened species,
     Public safety.
    We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the proposed project
or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to lessen
or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
    Our independent analysis of the issues will be in the EA. Depending
on the comments received during the

scoping process, the EA may be published and mailed to Federal, State,
and local agencies, public interest groups, interested individuals,
affected landowners, newspapers, libraries, and the Commission's
official service list for this proceeding. A comment period will be
allotted for review if the EA is published. We will consider all
comments on the EA before we make our recommendations to the
Commission. To ensure your comments are considered, please carefully
follow the instructions in the public participation section below.
    With this NOI, we are asking Federal, State, and local agencies
with jurisdiction and/or special expertise with respect to
environmental issues to formally cooperate with us in the preparation
of the EA. These agencies may choose to participate once they have
evaluated the proposal relative to their responsibilities. Additional
agencies that would like to request cooperating agency status should
follow the instructions for filing comments provided under the Public
Participation section of this NOI.

Currently Identified Environmental Issues

    We have already identified an issue that we think deserves
attention based on a preliminary review of the proposed facilities and
the environmental information provided by Kinder Morgan. This
preliminary list of issues may be changed based on your comments and
our analysis.
     Potential impacts may occur to the whooping crane, black-
footed ferret, spectaclecase, burrowing owl, swift fox, and mountain
plover.

Public Participation

    You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the Huntsman Ridge Expansion Project. Your
comments should focus on the potential environmental effects,
reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental
impacts. The more specific your comments, the more useful they will be.
To ensure that your comments are timely and properly recorded, please
send in your comments so that they will be received in Washington, DC
on or before May 20, 2009.
    For your convenience, there are three methods which you can use to
submit your comments to the Commission. In all instances please
reference the project docket number CP09-109-000 with your submission.
The docket number can be found on the front of this notice. The
Commission encourages electronic filing of comments and has dedicated
eFiling expert staff available to assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) You may file your comments electronically by using the Quick
Comment feature, which is located on the Commission's Internet Web site
at http://www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. A Quick
Comment is an easy method for interested persons to submit text-only
comments on a project;
    (2) You may file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the Commission's Internet Web site at
http://www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. eFiling
involves preparing your submission in the same manner as you would if
filing on paper, and then saving the file on your computer's hard
drive. You will attach that file as your submission. New eFiling users
must first create an account by clicking on ``Sign up'' or
``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you are
making. A comment on a particular project is considered a ``Comment on
a Filing;'' or
    (3) You may file your comments via mail to the Commission by
sending an original and two copies of your letter to: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE.,
Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426;
    Label one copy of the comments for the attention of Gas Branch 2,
PJ11.2.

Environmental Mailing List

    An effort is being made to send this notice to all individuals,
organizations, and government entities interested in and/or potentially
affected by the proposed project. This includes all landowners who are
potential right-of-way grantors, whose property may be used temporarily
for project purposes, or who own homes within distances defined in the
Commission's regulations of certain aboveground facilities.
    If you do not want to send comments at this time but still want to
remain on our mailing list, please return the Information Request
(Appendix 2). If you do not return the Information Request, you will be
taken off the mailing list.

Becoming an Intervenor

    In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want
to become an ``intervenor,'' which is an official party to the
proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the process and are
able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard by the courts if
they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling. An intervenor
formally participates in a Commission proceeding by filing a request to
intervene. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are included in the
User's Guide under the ``e-filing'' link on the Commission's Web site.

Additional Information

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at 1-866-208-FERC or on the
FERC Internet Web site (http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link.
Click on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the
docket number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number
field. Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.
    Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along with other related information.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-9543 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P