[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30242-30243]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10610]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2022-0254]

National Chemical Transportation Safety Advisory Committee; June
2022 Meetings

AGENCY: U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Chemical Transportation Safety Advisory Committee
(Committee) will meet to discuss matters relating to the safe and
secure marine transportation of hazardous materials. The meetings will
be open to the public via both a virtual platform and limited in-person
seating on a first come first served basis.

DATES:
    Meetings: The National Chemical Transportation Safety Advisory
Committee subcommittee will meet on Wednesday, June 8, 2022, from 9
a.m. to 5 p.m. The full Committee will meet on Thursday, June 9, 2022,
from 9 a.m. until 5 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Time). Please note these
meetings may close early if the Committee has completed its business.
    Comments and supporting documents: To ensure your comments are
reviewed by Committee members before the meeting, submit your written
comments no later than May 25, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at 1525 Wilson Boulevard,
Arlington, VA 22209.
    Pre-registration Information: Pre-registration is required for in-
person access to the meeting and for any attending by videoconference.
In-person attendance to the meeting will be limited to the first 33
registrants, with priority for members of the Committee, subcommittees,
and Coast Guard support staff. If you are not a member of the
Committee, subcommittees, or a member of the Coast Guard involved with
NCTSAC, you must request in-person attendance by contacting the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this notice. You will receive a response noting if you are able to
attend in-person or if the in-person roster is full.

    Attendees at the meeting will be required to follow COVID-19 safety
guidelines promulgated by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
(CDC), which may include the need to wear masks. CDC guidance on COVID
protocols can be found here: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/communication/guidance.html.
    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact
the individual listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this notice.
    Instructions: You are free to submit comments at any time,
including orally at the meeting as time permits, but, if you want
Committee members to review your comment before the meeting, please
submit your comments no later than May 25, 2022. The Committee is
particularly interested in comments related to the issues in the
``Agenda'' section below. The Committee encourages you to submit
comments through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, call or email the individual in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. You must include the docket number [USCG-2022-0254].
Comments received will be posted without alteration at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. You
may wish to review the Privacy and Security notice available on
homepage of https://regulations.gov and DHS's eRulemaking System of
Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). If you encounter
technical difficulties with comment submission, contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice.
    Docket Search: Documents mentioned in this notice as being
available in the docket, and all public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following
that website's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online
docket and sign-up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments
are posted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lieutenant Ethan T. Beard, Alternate
Designated Federal Officer of the National Chemical Transportation
Safety Advisory Committee, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, Stop
7509, Washington, DC 20593-7509, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax 202-372-
8382 or [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given in
accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, (5. U.S.C.
Appendix). The National Chemical Transportation Safety Advisory
Committee was established on December 4, 2018, by section 601 of the
Frank LoBiondo Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2018 (Pub. L. 115-282,
132 Stat. 4192), and codified in 46 U.S.C. 15101. The Committee
operates under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. Appendix) and 46 U.S.C. 15109.

Agenda

Day 1

Wednesday, June 8, 2022
    The day will be dedicated to subcommittee work:
    The subcommittee will address Task Statement 21-01, Recommendations
on Loading Limits of Gas Carriers and USCG Supplement to International
Hazardous Zone Requirements. The task statement and other subcommittee
information is available for viewing at https://homeport.uscg.mil/missions/federal-advisory-committees/national-chemical-transportation-safety-advisory-committee-(nctsac)/task-statements. The agenda for the
discussion will include the following:
    (1) Introduction and review subcommittee task statement.
    (2) Work on assigned task mentioned above.
    (3) Discuss and prepare any proposed recommendations for the full
Committee. The full Committee will receive the recommendations on Day 2
of the meeting.
    (4) Public comment period.
    (5) Adjournment of meeting.

Day 2

Thursday, June 9, 2022
    The agenda for the full Committee meeting is as follows:
    (1) Call to order.
    (2) Roll call, introduction, and swearing-in members; determination
of quorum.
    (3) Review of November 2, 2021, meeting minutes and status of task
items.
    (4) U.S. Coast Guard leadership remarks.
    (5) Chairman and Designated Federal Officer's remarks.
    (6) Committee will review, discuss, and formulate recommendations
on the following items:
    a. Task Statement 21-01: Recommendations on Loading Limits of Gas
Carriers and USCG Supplement to International Hazardous Zone
Requirements.
    (7) Presentation of the following task statements for Committee
discussion and vote:
    a. Task Statement 22-01, Recommendations to Support Reductions to
Emissions and Environmental Impacts Associated with Marine Transport of
Chemicals, Liquefied Gases and LNG;
    b. Task Statement 22-02, Recommendations on Industry Best Practices
and Regulatory Updates Related to the Maritime Transportation of
Lithium Batteries;
    c. Task Statement 22-03, Recommendations on Testing Requirements
for Anti-Flashback Burners for Vapor Control Systems.
    (8) Subcommittee recommendation(s) discussion.
    (9) Public comment period.
    (10) Closing remarks/set next meeting date and location.
    (11) Adjournment of meeting.
    A copy of all meeting documentation will be available at: https://homeport.uscg.mil/missions/federal-advisory-committees/national-chemical-transportation-safety-advisory-committee-(nctsac)/committee-
meetings no later than June 1, 2022. Alternatively, you may contact the
individual noted in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
    Public comments or questions will be taken throughout the meetings
as the Committee discusses the issues and prior to deliberations and
voting. There will be a public comment period at the end of meetings.
Speakers are requested to limit their comments to 2 minutes. Please
note that the public comment period will end following the last call
for comments. Contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section above, to register as a speaker.

    Dated: May 12, 2022.
Jeffrey G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2022-10610 Filed 5-17-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 24 (Monday, February 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7713-7715]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02435]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1819-035; ER10-1817-026; ER10-1818-033; ER10-
1820-038.
    Applicants: Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation,
Public Service Company of Colorado, Southwestern Public Service
Company, Northern States Power Company, a Minnesota corporation.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Northern States Power
Company, a Minnesota corporation, et al. under.
    Filed Date: 1/27/23.
    Accession Number: 20230127-5299.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/17/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1905-012.
    Applicants: AZ721 LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Amazon Energy LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/30/23.
    Accession Number: 20230130-5288.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-323-014.
    Applicants: Ohio Valley Electric Corporation.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Ohio Valley Electric
Corporation.
    Filed Date: 1/30/23.
    Accession Number: 20230130-5289.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2509-002; ER19-1992-002.
    Applicants: RE Gaskell West 2 LLC, RE Gaskell West 3 LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of RE Gaskell
West 3 LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 1/30/23.
    Accession Number: 20230130-5291.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2583-001.
    Applicants: Green River Wind Farm Phase 1, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Notification of Non-Material CIS
and Change in Category Seller Status to be effective 2/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-2215-001.
    Applicants: Peoples Natural Gas.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Peoples Natural Gas
Company LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/30/23.
    Accession Number: 20230130-5292.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-1703-003.
    Applicants: Salem Harbor Power Development LP.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Salem Harbor Power
Development LP.
    Filed Date: 1/26/23.
    Accession Number: 20230126-5191.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/16/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2190-001; ER22-2191-001; ER22-2192-001; ER14-
1594-005; ER14-1596-005; ER14-1934-006; ER14-1935-006; ER15-1020-004;
ER20-245-003; ER20-242-003; ER13-1816-017; ER20-246-003.
    Applicants: Windhub Solar A, LLC, Sustaining Power Solutions LLC,
Sunshine Valley Solar, LLC, Sun Streams, LLC, Rising Tree Wind Farm III
LLC, Rising Tree Wind Farm II LLC, Rising Tree Wind Farm LLC, Lone
Valley Solar Park II LLC, Lone Valley Solar Park I LLC, EDPR Scarlet I
LLC, EDPR CA Solar Park II LLC, EDPR CA Solar Park LLC.
    Description: Amendment to June 28, 2022, Triennial Market Power
Analysis for Southwest Region and Notice of Non-Material Change in
Status of EDPR CA Solar Park LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 1/25/23.
    Accession Number: 20230125-5179.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/15/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-52-002.
    Applicants: Westlake Chemicals & Vinyls LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Westlake Chemicals &
Vinyls LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/30/23.
    Accession Number: 20230130-5290.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-271-001.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Supplement to WECC Soft Price Cap
Justification Filing to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5169.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-597-000.
    Applicants: Oklahoma Gas and Electric Company.

    Description: Report Filing: Supplement to filing 43 to be effective
N/A.
    Filed Date: 1/23/23.
    Accession Number: 20230123-5070.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/13/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-976-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Q4 2022 Quarterly Filing of
City and County of San Francisco's WDT SA (SA 275) to be effective 12/
31/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/30/23.
    Accession Number: 20230130-5134.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-977-000.
    Applicants: Manitowoc Public Utilities.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Monthly SSR Payment for
Lakefront No. 9 with MISO to be effective 2/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/30/23.
    Accession Number: 20230130-5137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-978-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: DEF-TECO RS No. 80 Amendment
to be effective 4/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/30/23.
    Accession Number: 20230130-5148.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-980-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., New England Power Pool
Participants Committee.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: ISO New England Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: ISO-NE/NEPOOL; ISO Board Candidate
Age Limit Increase to be effective 4/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/30/23.
    Accession Number: 20230130-5169.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-982-000.
    Applicants: CPV Three Rivers, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Reactive Rates Filing to be
effective 3/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/30/23.
    Accession Number: 20230130-5220.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-983-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2023-01-31_SA 3495 ITC-White
Tail Solar 1st Rev GIA (J799) to be effective 1/19/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5018.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-984-000.
    Applicants: Three Corners Solar, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Revisions to MBR Tariff to Update
Category Seller Status in the Northeast Region to be effective 2/1/
2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-985-000.
    Applicants: Commonwealth Edison Company, PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Commonwealth Edison Company
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): ComEd submits revisions to
OATT, Attachment H-13 to be effective 12/20/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5023.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-986-000.
    Applicants: Titan Solar 1, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Revisions to MBR Tariff to Update
Category Seller Status in the Southwest Region to be effective 2/1/
2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-987-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Attachment AE
to Update Violation Relaxation Limits to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-988-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2142R5 Golden Spread
Electric Cooperative, Inc. NITSA NOA to be effective 4/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-989-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: LGIA, Commerce Energy
Storage 2 (TOT996/Q1766_SA No. 293) to be effective 2/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5068.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-990-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Alabama Power Company
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): SWE (Black Warrior) NITSA
2023 Rollover Filing to be effective 1/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5082.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-991-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Alabama Power Company
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): City of Evergreen NITSA
Rollover Filing to be effective 1/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-992-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company, Georgia Power Company,
Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Alabama Power Company
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): SWE (Tombigbee) NITSA 2023
Rollover Filing to be effective 1/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-993-000.
    Applicants: Bitter Ridge Wind Farm, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Revisions to MBR Tariff to Update
Category Seller Status in the Northeast Region to be effective 2/1/
2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5124.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-994-000.
    Applicants: Northern States Power Company, a Wisconsin corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2023-01-31 GRE SISA--Century
722-NSP to be effective 2/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5131.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-995-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: GIA, Tule Hydropower
WDT1794/SA1212 + Termination of Tule LA, SA1179 to be effective 2/1/
2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5136.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-996-000.
    Applicants: LSP-Whitewater Limited Partnership.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: MBR Cancellation to be effective 1/
31/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-997-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2023-01-31_SA 3978 OTP-
Bagley

Junction Capacitor MPFCA to be effective 4/2/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5168.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-998-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2023-01-31_SA 3983 OTP-
Oliver Wind IV FSA to be effective 4/2/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-999-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2023-01-31_SA 3984 OTP-
Northern Divide Wind FSA to be effective 4/2/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5173.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1000-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., The Narragansett Electric
Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: ISO New England Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): ISO-NE/The Narragansett Electric
Company; Filing of TSA-NECO-83 to be effective 1/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5175.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1001-000.
    Applicants: Persimmon Creek Wind Farm 1, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Notice of Non-Material Change in
Status and Revised MBR Tariff to be effective 2/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5183.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1002-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to ISA No. 5068,
Queue #AB1-081 (amend) to be effective 4/13/2018.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5187.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1003-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., The Narragansett Electric
Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: ISO New England Inc. submits
tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): ISO-NE/The Narragansett Electric
Company; Filing of New LSA-TSA-NECO-86 to be effective 1/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5188.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1004-000.
    Applicants: MD Solar 2, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Normal filing 2023 to be
effective 2/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5199.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-1005-000.
    Applicants: Vitol PA Wind Marketing LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Normal filing 2023 to be
effective 2/1/2023.
    Filed Date: 1/31/23.
    Accession Number: 20230131-5204.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/21/23.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 31, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-02435 Filed 2-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 45 (Tuesday, March 8, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13031-13032]
[FR Doc No: 2022-04802]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-057, OMB Control No. 3235-0057]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Regulation 14C (Commission Rules 14c-1 through 14c-7 and
Schedule 14C)

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Section 14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
``Exchange Act'') operates to require issuers that do not solicit
proxies or consents from any or all of the holders of record of a class
of securities registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act and in
accordance with the rules and regulations prescribed under Section
14(a) in connection with a meeting of security holders (including
action by consent) to distribute to any holders that were not solicited
an information statement substantially equivalent to the information
that would be required to be transmitted if a proxy or consent
solicitation were made. Regulation 14C (Exchange Act Rules 14c-1
through 14c-7 and Schedule 14C) (17 CFR 240.14c-1 through 240.14c-7 and
240.14c-101) sets forth the requirements for the dissemination, content
and filing of the information statement. We estimate that Schedule 14C
takes approximately 132.058 hours per response and will be filed by
approximately 569 issuers annually. In addition, we estimate that 75%
of the 132.058 hours per response (99.044 hours) is prepared by the
issuer for an annual reporting burden of 56,356 hours (99.044 hours per
response x 569 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication by May 9, 2022.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.

    Please direct your written comment to David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John
Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email to:
[email protected].

    Dated: March 2, 2022.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-04802 Filed 3-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: January 25, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 16)]
[Notices]
[Page 4127]
[DOCID:fr25ja06-64]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL06-47-000]

Devon Power LLC, Complainant v. ISO New England, Inc.,
Respondent; Notice of Complaint

January 18, 2006.
    Take notice that on January 12, 2006, Devon Power LLC filed a
formal complaint against ISO New England, Inc. pursuant to 18 CFR
385.206 , and Rule 206 of the Commission's Rule of Practice and
Procedures, seeking appeal, pursuant to section 6.3.6 of the ISO New
England Billing Policy, of ISO-NE England Inc.'s denial of Devon Power
LLC's Requested Billing Adjustment submitted on November 9, 2005.
    Devon Power LLC certifies that copies of the complaint were served
on the contacts for ISO New England, Inc.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on February 1, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-832 Filed 1-24-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 30, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 168)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 51505-51510]
[DOCID:fr30au06-19]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0292; FRL-8090-2]

S-metolachlor; Pesticide Tolerance

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for combined residues
of S-metolachlor in or on pumpkin, and squash, winter. Interregional
Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), as amended by the Food
Quality Protection Act of 1996 (FQPA).

DATES: This regulation is effective August 30, 2006. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before October 30, 2006,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).

ADDRESSES:  EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0292. All documents in the
docket are listed in the index for the docket. Although listed in the
index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or,

if only available in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in
Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive,
Arlington, VA. The Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shaja R. Brothers, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS 111), e.g., agricultural workers;
greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers; farmers.
     Animal production (NAICS 112), e.g., cattle ranchers and
farmers, dairy cattle farmers, livestock farmers.
     Food manufacturing (NAICS 311), e.g., agricultural
workers; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and floriculture workers;
ranchers; pesticide applicators.
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS 32532), e.g., agricultural
workers; commercial applicators; farmers; greenhouse, nursery, and
floriculture workers; residential users.
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies of this Document?

    In addition to accessing an electronic copy of this Federal
Register document through the electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov
, you may access this Federal Register document

electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may also access a

frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR part 180 through the
Government Printing Office's pilot e-CFR site at http://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
 To access the OPPTS Harmonized Guidelines

referenced in this document, go directly to the guidelines at http://www.epa.gpo/opptsfrs/home/guidelin.htm

C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing Request?

    Under section 408(g) of the FFDCA, as amended by the FQPA, any
person may file an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may
also request a hearing on those objections. The EPA procedural
regulations which govern the submission of objections and requests for
hearings appear in 40 CFR part 178. You must file your objection or
request a hearing on this regulation in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by
EPA, you must identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0292 in the
subject line on the first page of your submission. All requests must be
in writing, and must be mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk on or
before October 30, 2006.
    In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing that does not contain any CBI for inclusion in the public
docket that is described in ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit your copies, identified by docket ID
number

EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0292, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Building), 2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

II. Background and Statutory Findings

    In the Federal Register of April 21, 2006 71 FR 20663 FRL-8064-6,
EPA issued a notice pursuant to section 408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP 5E7015)
by IR-4, 681 Highway 1 South, North Brunswick, NJ 08902-3390. The
petition requested that 40 CFR 180.368(a)(3) be amended by establishing
tolerances for combined residues of the herbicide S-metolachlor, S-2-
chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-
methylethyl)acetamide], its R-enantiomer, and its metabolites,
determined as the derivatives, 2-[2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)amino]-1-
propanol and 4-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-
morpholinone, in or on pumpkin and squash, winter at 1.0 part per
million (ppm), respectively. The tolerances were subsequently amended
to 0.1 ppm for raw agricultural commodities previously mentioned. This
notice included a summary of the petition prepared by Syngenta, the
registrant. There were no comments received in response to the notice
of filing.
    Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue....''
    EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. For further discussion of the
regulatory requirements of section 408 of the FFDCA and a complete
description of the risk assessment process, see http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-PEST/1997/November/Day-26/p30948.htm
.

III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety

    Consistent with section 408(b)(2)(D) of FFDCA, EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to
make a determination on aggregate exposure, consistent with section
408(b)(2) of FFDCA, for tolerances for combined residues of S-
metolachlor on pumpkin at 0.1 ppm, and squash, winter at 0.1 ppm. EPA's
assessment of exposure and risk associated with establishing the
tolerances follows.

A. Toxicological Profile

    EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the toxic effects caused by metolachlor and S-metolachlor as well as
the no-observed-adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-
adverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be found at
http://www.regulations.gov (Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPP- 2006-0292-0003; pages 53-

64).

B. Toxicological Endpoints

    For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the dose at which no adverse effects are observed
(the NOAEL) from the toxicology study identified as appropriate for use
in risk assessment is used to estimate the toxicological level of
concern (LOC). However, the lowest dose at which adverse effects of
concern are identified (the LOAEL) is sometimes used for risk
assessment if no NOAEL was achieved in the toxicology study selected.
An uncertainty factor (UF) is applied to reflect uncertainties inherent
in the extrapolation from laboratory animal data to humans and in the
variations in sensitivity among members of the human population as well
as other unknowns.
    The linear default risk methodology (Q*) is the primary method
currently used by the Agency to quantify non-threshold hazards such as
cancer. The Q* approach assumes that any amount of exposure will lead
to some degree of cancer risk, estimates risk in terms of the
probability of occurrence of additional cancer cases. More information
can be found on the general principles EPA uses in risk
characterization at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/health/human.htm.

    A summary of the toxicological endpoints for metolachlor and S-
metolachlor used for human risk assessment is discussed at
http://www.regulations.gov (Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0292; pages 20-21).

C. Exposure Assessment

    1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. Tolerances have been
established (40 CFR 180.368) for the combined residues of S-
metolachlor, in or on a variety of raw agricultural commodities. Meat,
milk, poultry and egg tolerances have also been established. Risk
assessments were conducted by EPA to assess dietary exposures from S-
metolachlor in food as follows:
    Both the acute and chronic analyses assume tolerance-level residues
on all crops with established, pending, or proposed tolerances for
metolachlor and/or S-metolachlor. In cases where separate tolerance
listings occur for both metolachlor and S-metolachlor on the same
commodity, the higher value of the two is used in the analyses.
    i. Acute exposure. Quantitative acute dietary exposure and risk
assessments are performed for a food-use pesticide, if a toxicological
study has indicated the possibility of an effect of concern occurring
as a result of a one-day or single exposure.
     In conducting the acute dietary exposure assessment EPA used the
Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model software with the Food Commodity
Intake Database (DEEM-FCID\TM\), which incorporates food consumption
data as reported by respondents in the USDA 1994-1996 and 1998
Nationwide Continuing Surveys of Food Intake by Individuals (CSFII),
and accumulated

exposure to the chemical for each commodity. The following assumptions
were made for the acute exposure assessments: An acute dietary analysis
for S-metolachlor was conducted using tolerance level residues and 100
% crop treated (CT) for all existing and proposed uses.
    ii. Chronic exposure. In conducting the chronic dietary exposure
assessment EPA used the Dietary Exposure Evaluation Model software with
the Food Commodity Intake Database (DEEM-FCID\TM\), which incorporates
food consumption data as reported by respondents in the USDA 1994-1996
and 1998 Nationwide Continuing Surveys of Food Intake by Individuals
(CSFII), and accumulated exposure to the chemical for each commodity.
The following assumptions were made for the chronic exposure
assessments: A chronic dietary analysis for S-metolachlor was conducted
using tolerance level residues and 100 %CT data for all existing and
proposed uses.
    iii. Cancer. Metolachlor has been classified as a Group C, possible
human carcinogen based on liver tumors in rats at the highest dose
tested (HDT). The chronic NOAEL of 15 mg/kg/day that was established
based on tumors in the rat (seen at the HDT of 150 mg/kg/day) is
comparable to the NOAEL of 9.7 mg/kg/day selected for establishing the
chronic reference dose for metolachlor. EPA has concluded that the
chronic dietary PAD is protective for cancer dietary risk. Therefore, a
separate cancer aggregate risk assessment was not conducted.
    2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. The Agency lacks
sufficient monitoring exposure data to complete a comprehensive dietary
exposure analysis and risk assessment for s-metolachlor drinking water.
Because the Agency does not have comprehensive monitoring data,
drinking water concentration estimates are made by reliance on
simulation or modeling taking into account data on the physical
characteristics of s-metolachor. Further information regarding EPA
drinking water models used in pesticide exposure assessment can be
found at http://www.epa.gov/oppefed1/models/water/index.htm.

     A drinking water assessment was conducted based on monitoring data
from several sources, as well as on Tier 1 FIRST and SCI-GROW modeling
results. This assessment is a worst-case scenario and demonstrates high
end numbers. The analytical methods used to obtain the monitoring data
are not able to distinguish between metolachlor and S-metolachlor;
therefore, the estimated environmental concentrations (EECs) presented
in this risk assessment are representative of both racemic metolachlor
and S-metolachlor.
    EECs for metolachlor and S-metolachlor were calculated for both the
parent compound and the ethanesulfonic acid (ESA) and oxanilic acid
(OA) degradates. Although it was determined by the EPA that the ESA and
OA metabolites appear to be less toxic than parent metolachlor, they
are included in the risk assessment since they were found in greater
abundance than the parent in water monitoring studies.
    The crops with the highest maximum seasonal application rates are
turf (S-metolachlor only) and corn (racemic metolachlor and S-
metolachlor) with a maximum seasonal application rate of 4.0 lbs ai/A.
Based on PRZM/EXAMS modeling the maximum peak and annual average
concentrations of metolachlor/ S-metolachlor in surface water were 199
ug/l and 9.2 ug/l, respectively. Based on FIRST modeling results, the
estimate of the drinking water concentration from surface water sources
of metolachlor ESA, a major degradate of metolachlor, is not likely to
exceed 31.9 ug/L for the annual peak concentration and 22.8 ug/L for
the annual average exposure for use on turf/corn at a maximum annual
application rate of 4.0 lbs ai/A. Based on FIRST modeling results, the
estimate of the drinking water concentration from surface water sources
of metolachlor OA, another major degradate of metolachlor, is not
likely to exceed 91.4 ug/L for the annual peak concentration and 65.1
ug/L for the annual average exposure for use on turf/corn at a maximum
annual application rate of 4.0 lbs ai/A (ground application with no
spray drift).
    The SCI-GROW screening model was used to estimate groundwater
concentrations. The estimated concentration of metolachlor/ S-
metolachlor in drinking water from shallow groundwater sources is 5.5
ug/l for application on corn at a seasonal maximum rate of 4.0 lbs ai/
A. This concentration is appropriate for both the peak and annual
average exposures. The EEC for metolachlor degradate ESA based on
metolachlor use on turf/corn is not expected to exceed 65.8 ug/l for
peak and annual average exposures. The EEC for metolachlor OA from
metolachlor use on turf/corn is not expected to exceed 31.7 ug/l for
peak and annual average exposures.

                                           Table 1: Metolachlor EEC's
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Surface Water (peak)   Surface Water (average)        Ground Water
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parent                                                     199                      9.2                      5.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
metolachlor ESA                                           31.9                     22.8                     65.8
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
metolachlor OA                                            91.4                     65.1                     31.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total EECs (ppb)                                         322.3                     97.1                    103.0
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Modeled estimates of drinking water concentrations were directly
entered into the dietary exposure model (DEEM-FCID\TM\). For acute
dietary risk, since the surface water EDWCs are higher than the
groundwater EDWC, the peak concentration of 322.3 ppb was used to
access the contribution to drinking water. For chronic dietary risk
assessment, since the ground water EDWCs are higher than the surface
water EDWC the ground water concentration of 103.0 ppb was used to
access the contribution to drinking water.
    3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
    The formulated S-metolachlor end-use product is labeled under the
trade name Pennant MAGNUM\TM\ (EPA Reg. No. 100-950) to distinguish the
new product from the original metolachlor formulation named Pennant\TM\
(EPA Reg. No. 100-691). Pennant MAGNUM\TM\ (7.62 lbs. active ingredient
per gallon) is labeled for use on commercial (sod farm) and residential
warm-season turfgrasses and other

noncrop land including golf courses, sports fields, and ornamental
gardens. Although not labeled as a restricted-use pesticide, Pennant
MAGNUM\TM\, as currently marketed, is not intended for homeowner
purchase or use (intended for use by professionals). On this basis,
with regard to the requirements of FQPA, metolachlor and S-metolachlor
are assessed only for post application exposure and risk. Pennant
MAGNUM\TM\ and Pennant\TM\ are both emulsifiable concentrates (EC).
    For this risk assessment, small children are the population group
of concern. Although the type of site that S-metolachlor may be used on
varies from golf courses to ornamental gardens, the scenario chosen for
risk assessment (residential turf use) represents what the Agency
considers the likely upper-end of possible exposure. Post application
exposures from various activities following lawn treatment are
considered to be the most common and significant in residential
settings. Since toxicity was not observed in a dermal toxicity study,
up to a dose level of 1,000 mg/kg/day, the only parameter of risk
addressed in this assessment is the possible oral exposure of small
children from treated turf, or soil.
    The estimate for hand-to-mouth exposure on the day of treatment is
0.037 mg/kg/day (MOE = 1,400) for S-metolachlor and 0.06 mg/kg/day (MOE
= 840) for metolachlor. (MOE estimates are based on the short-term
NOAEL of 50 mg/kg/day).
    The estimate for object-to-mouth exposure on the day of treatment
is 0.0092 mg/kg/day (MOE = 5,400) for S-metolachlor and 0.015 mg/kg/day
(MOE = 3,300) for metolachlor. (MOE estimates are based on the short-
term NOAEL of 50 mg/kg/day).
    The estimate for soil ingestion exposure on the day of treatment is
0.00012 mg/kg/day (MOE = 400,000) for S-metolachlor and 0.0002 mg/kg/
day (MOE = 250,000) for metolachlor. (MOE estimates are based on the
short-term NOAEL of 50 mg/kg/day).
    The estimate for hand-to-mouth, object-to-mouth, and soil ingestion
combined (on the day of treatment) is 0.046 mg/kg/day (MOE = 1,100) for
S-metolachlor and 0.075 mg/kg/day (MOE = 670) for metolachlor. (MOE
estimates are based on the short-term NOAEL of 50 mg/kg/day).
    The MOE estimates are greater than 100 and indicate that the
potential metolachlor/S-metolachlor exposure (to children) associated
with residential use is not of concern. Although considered an upper-
bound, the exposure estimate for the three scenarios, combined, is
recommended for aggregate (residential, food, and drinking water) risk
estimates.
    4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
    Unlike other pesticides for which EPA has followed a cumulative
risk approach based on a common mechanism of toxicity, EPA has not made
a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to S-metolachlor and any
other substances and S-metolachlor does not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other substances. For the purposes of this
tolerance action, therefore, EPA has not assumed that S-metolachlor has
a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For information
regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see the policy statements released by EPA's Office of
Pesticide Programs concerning common mechanism determinations and
procedures for cumulating effects from substances found to have a
common mechanism on EPA's website at http://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative
.

D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children

    1. In general. Section 408 of FFDCA provides that EPA shall apply
an additional tenfold margin of safety for infants and children in the
case of threshold effects to account for prenatal and postnatal
toxicity and the completeness of the data base on toxicity and exposure
unless EPA determines based on reliable data that a different margin of
safety will be safe for infants and children. Margins of safety are
incorporated into EPA risk assessments either directly through use of a
MOE analysis or through using uncertainty (safety) factors in
calculating a dose level that poses no appreciable risk to humans. In
applying this provision, EPA either retains the default value of 10X
when reliable data do not support the choice of a different factor, or,
if reliable data are available, EPA uses a different additional safety
factor value based on the use of traditional uncertainty factors and/or
special FQPA safety factors, as appropriate.
    2. Prenatal and postnatal sensitivity--i. Metolachlor. The prenatal
developmental studies in the rat and rabbit revealed no evidence of a
qualitative or quantitative susceptibility in fetal animals. In the
rabbit prenatal developmental toxicity study, at 360 mg/kg/day,
maternal animals had persistent anorexia and decreased body weight
gain; the NOAEL was 120 mg/kg/day. In the rat prenatal developmental
toxicity study, frank toxicity [death, clinical signs (clonic and/or
tonic convulsions, excessive salivation, urine-stained abdominal fur
and/or excessive salivation) and decreased body weight gain] was
observed at the limit dose of 1,000 mg/kg/day in maternal animals; the
NOAEL was 300 mg/kg/day. The developmental effects at 1,000 mg/kg/day
included slightly decreased number of implantations per dam, decreased
number of live fetuses/dam, increased number of resorptions/dam and
significant decrease in mean fetal body weight.
    In the two-generation reproduction study in rats, there was no
evidence of parental or reproductive toxicity at approximately 80 mg/
kg/day, the HDT. At this dose, there was a minor decrease in fetal body
weight beginning at lactation day 4; the NOAEL was approximately 25 mg/
kg/day. Since a similar body weight decrease was not seen on lactation
day zero, the cause of the effect on later lactation days is most
likely due to exposure of the pups to metolachlor in the diet and/or
milk and therefore is not evidence of an increased quantitative
susceptibility in post-natal animals.
    ii. S-metolachlor. There was no evidence of increased quantitative
or qualitative fetal susceptibility in the prenatal developmental
studies in rats and rabbits. In the rat, maternal toxicity [increased
clinical signs of toxicity (pushing head through bedding) and decreased
body weights/body weight gains, food consumption and food efficiency
was observed at 500 mg/kg/day; the NOAEL was 50 mg/kg/day. There were
no developmental effects at 1,000 mg/kg/day, the HDT. In the rabbit,
clinical signs of toxicity (little/none/soft stool) were observed at
100 mg/kg/day; the NOAEL was 20 mg/kg/day. No developmental effects
were observed at 500 mg/kg/day, the HDT.
    3. Conclusion. There is a complete toxicity data base for S-
metolachlor and exposure data are complete or are estimated based on
data that reasonably accounts for potential exposures. EPA determined
that the 10X SF to protect infants and children should be reduced to 1X
for the following reasons:
    i. The toxicology database is complete for the FQPA assessment.

    ii. There is no indication of quantitative or qualitative increased
susceptibility of rats or rabbits to in utero and/or postnatal exposure
to metolachlor or S-metolachlor in the available toxicity data.
    iii. A developmental neurotoxicity study is not required for
metolachlor or S-metolachlor.
    iv. The dietary (food and drinking water) and non-dietary exposure
(residential) assessments will not underestimate the potential
exposures for infants and children from the use of metolachlor or S-
metolachlor.

E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety

    1. Acute risk. Using the exposure assumptions discussed in this
unit for acute exposure, the acute dietary exposure from food and water
to S-metolachlor will occupy < 1% of the aPAD for the US population and
other population subgroups, and 2% of the aPAD for all infants < 1 year
old. EPA does not expect the aggregate exposure to exceed 100% of the
aPAD.
    2. Chronic risk. Using the exposure assumptions described in this
unit for chronic exposure, EPA has concluded that exposure to S-
metolachlor from food and water will utilize 4% of the cPAD for the
U.S. population, 10% of the cPAD for all infants <  1 year old, and 8%
of the cPAD for children 1-2 years old. EPA does not expect the
aggregate exposure to exceed 100% of the cPAD.
    3. Short-term risk. Short-term aggregate exposure takes into
account residential exposure plus chronic exposure to food and water
(considered to be a background exposure level). A short-term aggregate
risk assessment considers potential exposure from food, drinking water,
and short-term, non-occupational (residential) pathways of exposure for
a duration of 1 to 30 days.
    Potential short-term, non-occupational risk scenarios for S-
metolachlor consist of oral exposure of children to treated lawns only.
In this aggregate short-term risk assessment, exposure from food,
drinking water, and residential lawns has been considered. The exposure
to food and water has already been considered in the chronic dietary
risk assessment. Since only children have the potential for non-
occupational, short-term risk, they are the only population subgroup
for which an aggregate short-term risk assessment was conducted.
Toddlers' S-metolachlor incidental oral exposure is assumed to include
hand-to-mouth exposure, object-to-mouth exposure and exposure through
incidental ingestion of soil.

                  Table 2.--Aggregate Risk Assessment for Short-Term Exposure to S-metolachlor
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Short-Term Scenario
                                            --------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                         Average
                 Population                                              Food and   Residential   Aggregate MOE
                                             NOAEL mg/kg/    LOC\1\       Water     Exposure mg/   (food, water
                                                 day                   Exposure mg/  kg/day\2\         and
                                                                          kg/day                 residential)\3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All infants < 1 yr old                                 50          100     0.010003        0.046            890
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The level of concern (LOC) MOE is 100, based on inter- and intra-species safety factors totaling 100.
\2\ Residential Exposure = [Incidental Oral exposure from all possible sources-combined hand-to-mouth, object-to-
  mouth, and soil ingestion oral exposure]. No residential oral exposure is expected for adults
\3\ Aggregate MOE = [NOAEL / (Avg Food and Water Exposure + Residential Exposure)]

    4. Aggregate cancer risk for U.S. population. S-metolachlor is
classified as classified as a Group C, possible human carcinogen. EPA
has concluded that the chronic dietary PAD is protective for cancer
dietary risk and, as noted above, chronic exposure is below the chronic
dietary PAD.
    5. Determination of safety. Based on these risk assessments, EPA
concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result
to the general population, and to infants and children from aggregate
exposure to S-metolachlor residues.

IV. Other Considerations

A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology

    Adequate methodology is available for enforcing the current and
proposed tolerances. The Pesticide Analytical Manual (PAM, Vol. II)
lists a GC/NPD method (Methods I) for determining residues in/on plants
and a GC/MSD method (Method II) for determining residues in livestock
commodities. These methods determine residues of S-metolachlor and its
metabolites as either CGA-37913 or CGA-49751 following acid hydrolysis.
A modified version of this method (Syngenta Method No. 1848-01) which
uses liquid chromotography/mass spectrometry/mass spectrometry (LC/MS/
MS) has also been used. Adequate data are available on the recovery of
metolachlor through Multi-residue Method Testing Protocols. The FDA
PESTDATA database indicates that S-metolachlor is completely recovered
through Method 302, PAM Vol. I.

B. International Residue Limits

    There are currently no Codex, Canadian or Mexican MRLs for S-
metolachlor; therefore there are no international harmonization issues
for these actions.

V. Conclusion

    Therefore, the tolerances are established for combined residues of
S-metolachlor, S-2-chloro-N-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-N-(2-methoxy-1-
methylethyl)acetamide], its R-enantiomer, and its metabolites,
determined as the derivatives, 2-[2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)amino]-1-
propanol and 4-(2-ethyl-6-methylphenyl)-2-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-
morpholinone, in or on pumpkin and squash, winter at 0.1 ppm.

VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This final rule establishes a tolerance under section 408(d) of
FFDCA in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled Regulatory Planning and
Review (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this rule has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866 due to its lack of
significance, this rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This final rule does
not contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., or impose
any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates

Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Public Law 104-4). Nor does it require any
special considerations under Executive Order 12898, entitled Federal
Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994); or OMB review
or any Agency action under Executive Order 13045, entitled Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997). This action does not involve any technical
standards that would require Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA), Public Law
104-113, section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note). Since tolerances and
exemptions that are established on the basis of a petition under
section 408(d) of FFDCA, such as the tolerance in this final rule, do
not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do not apply.
In addition, the Agency has determined that this action will not have a
substantial direct effect on States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified
in Executive Order 13132, entitled Federalism (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). Executive Order 13132 requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by State and local
officials in the development of regulatory policies that have
federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have federalism
implications'' is defined in the Executive order to include regulations
that have ``substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government.'' This final rule directly regulates growers, food
processors, food handlers and food retailers, not States. This action
does not alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of section 408(n)(4) of FFDCA. For these same reasons, the Agency has
determined that this rule does not have any ``tribal implications'' as
described in Executive Order 13175, entitled Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments (65 FR 67249, November 6,
2000). Executive Order 13175, requires EPA to develop an accountable
process to ensure ``meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in
the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.''
``Policies that have tribal implications'' is defined in the Executive
order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct effects on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and the Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.''
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as specified in
Executive Order 13175. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to
this rule.

VII. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of this final rule in the Federal Register. This final
rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: August 23, 2006.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.

0
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:

PART 180--AMENDED

0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.

0
2. Section 180.368 is amended in paragraph (a)(3) by adding commodities
to the table to read as follows:

Sec.  180.368  Metolachlor; tolerances for residues.

    (a)* * *
    (3) * * *

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   Commodity                        Parts per million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                * * * * *
Pumpkin                                                              0.1
                                * * * * *
Squash, winter                                                       0.1
                                * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

[FR Doc. E6-14443 Filed 8-29-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 88 (Tuesday, May 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 19978]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09258]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85758; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2019-12]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To List and Trade Shares of the
iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy ETF Under NYSE Arca Rule 8.600-E

May 1, 2019.
    On March 1, 2019, NYSE Arca, Inc (``Exchange'' or ``NYSE Arca'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
list and trade the shares of the iShares Commodity Curve Carry Strategy
ETF, a series of the iShares U.S. ETF Trust, pursuant to NYSE Arca Rule
8-600-E, which governs the listing and trading of Managed Fund Shares
on the Exchange. The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on March 20, 2019.\3\ On April 18, 2019, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change. The
Commission has received no comment letters on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85312 (March 14,
2019), 84 FR 10369.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is May 4, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending this 45-day time period. The Commission
finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer period within which
to take action on the proposal so that it has sufficient time to
consider the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\5\ designates June 18, 2019, as the date by which the Commission
shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-
NYSEArca-2019-12), as modified by Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-09258 Filed 5-6-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Alan Stout EPA OAR, OTAQ, ASD Received Date: 11/ 29/ 2004 04: 29: 42 PM To: Michael_ Tyrrell@ ahm. honda. com cc: Darin_ Johnson@ ahm. honda. com, Takami_ Yano@ ahm. honda. com, Subject: Re: Our telephone conversation  Definition change in the technical amendments Michael, My responses are inserted below. Let me know if you have follow up questions.

Alan Michael_ Tyrrell@ ahm. honda. com Received Date: 11/ 23/ 2004 07: 04: 07 PM To: Alan Stout/ AA/ USEPA/ US@ EPA cc: Takami_ Yano@ ahm. honda. com, Darin_ Johnson@ ahm. honda. com Subject: Our telephone conversation  Definition change in the technical amendme As a follow up to our phone conversation Honda, understands EPA's intention and clarification as follows.

1) EPA will revise 1051.801 in Technical Amendment to address a mismatch with durability requirement.  Correct. Final language is still under development.

2) EPA allows manufacturers to perform durability testing based on defined miles or hours even for vehicles not equipped with either an odometer or an hour meter.  Durability testing for certification testing is always based on accelerated service accumulation, so this makes sense only in terms of miles or hours of operation.

3) Although the regulation requires alternative useful life description on emission label, EPA does not require manufacturers to put alternative useful life on emission label if the vehicle is not equipped with a device to measure the duration ( miles or hours).  That is a new twist on the question we discussed earlier. From what you had described, I would expect that you don't have families that need an alternative useful life. For all the engines that go with the default useful life from the regulations, we have proposed ( and intend to finalize) the provision allowing you to omit the useful life information from the label. There has been no discussion of omitting the alternative useful life values from emission labels if the corresponding meter is not installed. We can consider that, but it doesn't strike me as an automatic or self evident conclusion. Let me know if you would like us to pursue this new angle.

We would like to receive your confirmation that my understanding of your responses during this telephone conversation is correct. And would ask that you also provide us with a written response to our question about how EPA plans to finalize the NER equations in light of the MIC's comments to the technical amendments. For expediency sake, I request that provide your response by E mail and that you also copy Darin Johnson and Takami Yano when you respond.

 I consider MIC's recommended NER changes to be straightforward and intend to process those directly.

Darin and I will be out of the office until next Tuesday you can call Mr. Yano [( 310) 783 3286] if you need to discuss these issues further.

Thank you for your help and, Best Regards.

American Honda Motor Co. Michael Tyrrell Administrator Certification Michael_ Tyrrell@ ahm. honda. com


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 116 (Friday, June 15, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 35961]
[FR Doc No: 2012-14721]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9003-5]

Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 06/04/2012 through 06/08/2012
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is seeking agencies to participate in
its e-NEPA electronic EIS submission pilot. Participating agencies can
fulfill all requirements for EIS filing, eliminating the need to submit
paper copies to EPA Headquarters, by filing documents online and
providing feedback on the process. To participate in the pilot,
register at: https://cdx.epa.gov.

EIS No. 20120182, Final EIS, BLM, NM, Alamogordo Regional Water Supply
Project, Construction and Operation Groundwater Wells and Conveyance
System, Right-of-Way Application, Otero County, NM, Review Period Ends:
07/16/2012, Contact: Douglas Haywood<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120183, Final EIS, USAF, 00, F-35A Training Basing, To Base a
Pilot Training Center with the Beddown of F-35A Training Aircraft at
four Alternative Bases, Boise AGS, Holloman AFD, Luke AFB, and Tucson
AGS, ID, AZ, NM, Review Period Ends: 07/16/2012, Contact: Kim Fornof
210-652-1961.
EIS No. 20120184, Draft EIS, NOAA, 00, Issuing Annual Quotas to the
Alaska Eskimo Whaling Commission (AEWC) for a Subsistence Hunt on
Bowhead Whales for the Years 2013 through 2017/2018, Comment Period
Ends: 08/14/2012, Contact: Ellen Sebastian<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120185, Draft EIS, VCT, NM, Valles Caldera National Preserve,
Public Use and Access Plan, Implementation, Sandoval and Arriba
Counties, NM, Comment Period Ends: 08/14/2012, Contact: Marie Rodriquez
505-660-3333.
EIS No. 20120186, Final EIS, BLM, AZ, Lower Sonoran and Sonoran Desert
National Monument, Resource Management Plan, To Provide Guidance for
Managing the Use of Public Lands and Provide a Framework for Future
Land Management Actions, Maricopa, Pinal, Pima, Gila and Yuma Counties,
AZ, Review Period Ends: 07/16/2012, Contact: Chris Horyza<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120187, Final EIS, USFS, CA, Pettijohn Late-Successional
Reserve Habitat Improvement and Fuels Reduction Project,
Implementation, Trinity River Management, Trinity Unit of the Shasta-
Trinity National Recreation Area, Trinity County, CA, Review Period
Ends: 07/16/2012, Contact: Keli McElroy<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120188, Draft EIS, USFS, SD, Calumet Project Area, Multiple
Resource Management Actions, Implementation, Pennington County, SD,
Comment Period Ends: 07/30/2012, Contact: Lou Conroy<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120189, Final EIS, USACE, CA, Berths 302-306 American
Presidents Line (APL) Container Terminal Project, Construction and
Operation, US Army COE Section 10 and Section 103 of the Marine
Protection Research and Sanctuaries Act, Los Angeles County, CA, Review
Period Ends: 07/16/2012, Contact: Theresa Stevens<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120190, Draft EIS, NOAA, 00, Harvest Specifications and
Management Measures for the 2013-2014 Pacific Coast Groundfish Fishery
and Amendment 21-2 to the Pacific Coast Fishery Management Plan,
Implementation, off the Coast of WA, OR, and CA, Comment Period Ends:
07/30/2012, Contact: Becky Renko<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20120191, Draft EIS, USACE, CO, Chatfield Reservoir Storage
Reallocation, To Reallocate 20,600 acre-feet of Storage from the
Exclusive Flood Control Pool to the Conservation Pool, Funding, Adams/
Weld County Line, CO, Comment Period Ends: 08/14/2012, Contact: Gwyn
Jarrett<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20120180, Final EIS, USN, HI, Basing of MV-22 and H-1 Aircraft
in Support of III Marine Expeditionary Force (MEF) Elements,
Construction and Renovation of Facilities to Accommodate and Maintain
the Squadrons, HI, Review Period Ends: 07/11/2012, Contact: 808-472-
1196.

    Revision of FR Notice Published 06/8/2012; Correction to Comment
Period Ends 07/11/2012.

    Dated: June 12, 2012.
Cliff Rader,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2012-14721 Filed 6-14-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 5 (Friday, January 7, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 1151]
[FR Doc No: 2011-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. NJ11-10-000]

City of Azusa, CA; Notice of Filing

December 30, 2010.
    Take notice that on December 23, 2010, the City of Azusa,
California (Azusa) filed its annual revisions to is Transmission
Revenue Balancing Account Adjustment and a related modification to
Appendix I to Azusa's Transmission Owner Tariff (TO), consistent with
its TO filed in Docket No. EL03-21-000 and the California Independent
System Operator Corporation Electric Tariff.
    Azusa also requests any necessary waivers by the Commission to
allow this filing to be accepted for filing and approved by the
Commission to become effective as of January 1, 2011.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 24, 2011.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-44 Filed 1-6-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P