[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73754-73755]
[FR Doc No: 2021-28201]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RM98-1-000]

Records Governing Off-the-Record Communications; Public Notice

    This constitutes notice, in accordance with 18 CFR 385.2201(b), of
the receipt of prohibited and exempt off-the-record communications.
    Order No. 607 (64 FR 51222, September 22, 1999) requires Commission
decisional employees, who make or receive a prohibited or exempt off-
the-record communication relevant to the merits of a contested
proceeding, to deliver to the Secretary of the Commission, a copy of
the communication, if written, or a summary of the substance of any
oral communication.
    Prohibited communications are included in a public, non-decisional
file associated with, but not a part of, the decisional record of the
proceeding. Unless the Commission determines that the prohibited
communication and any responses thereto should become a part of the
decisional record, the prohibited off-the-record communication will not
be considered by the Commission in reaching its decision. Parties to a
proceeding may seek the opportunity to respond to any facts or
contentions made in a prohibited off-the-record communication and may
request that the Commission place the prohibited communication and
responses thereto in the decisional record. The Commission will grant
such a request only when it determines that fairness so requires. Any
person identified below as having made a prohibited off-the-record
communication shall serve the document on all parties listed on the

official service list for the applicable proceeding in accordance with
Rule 2010, 18 CFR 385.2010.
    Exempt off-the-record communications are included in the decisional
record of the proceeding, unless the communication was with a
cooperating agency as described by 40 CFR 1501.6, made under 18 CFR
385.2201(e)(1)(v).
    The following is a list of off-the-record communications recently
received by the Secretary of the Commission. The communications listed
are grouped by docket numbers in ascending order. These filings are
available for electronic review at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's website at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected] or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
          Docket Nos.               File date     Presenter or requester
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited:
    None.......................
Exempt:
    1. CP17-458-000............      12-14-2021  U.S. Congressman Tom
                                                  Cole.
    2. EL21-85-000, EL21-103-        12-17-2021  U.S. Congress.\1\
     000.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: December 21, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-28201 Filed 12-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


1Point source category discharges are regulated by Effluent Limitations Guidelines ( ELGs), found at 40 CFR Part 405 to 471.

Page 1 of 20 Memorandum From: Carey A. Johnston, P. E. USEPA/ OW/ OST ph: ( 202) 566 1014 johnston. carey@ epa. gov To: Public Record for the Effluent Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/ 2005 DCN 00705, Section 3.0 EPA Docket Number OW 2003 0074 ( www. epa. gov/ edockets/)

Date: December 30, 2003 Re: Industry Data Summary Fact Sheets I. Overview The Clean Water Act ( CWA) Section 304( m)( 1)( A) requires EPA to establish a schedule for the annual review and revision of all existing effluent guidelines. Additionally, CWA Section 304( m)( 1)( B) requires EPA to identify categories of point sources discharging toxic or nonconventional pollutants for which EPA has not published effluent guidelines. This memorandum presents fact sheets summarizing data used in a screening level analysis of specific industrial categories already regulated by effluent limitations guidelines and industrial sectors not yet regulated by effluent guidelines. EPA used this screening level data in its development of the preliminary Effluent Guidelines Program Plan for 2004/ 2005.

Generally, EPA used SIC codes reported by facilities to assign them to one of the point source categories already regulated by existing effluent guidelines1 or to an industrial sector not regulated by effluent guidelines. In some cases, after a data quality check ( see below), EPA revised a facility's SIC code and assignment to a point source category or industrial sector to better reflect the industrial processes generating wastewater at the facility. ( See Corrections to Loads Calculated from PCS Discharge Data, DCN 00668, Section 2.1.2.) More information about the industrial categories and sectors listed in this memorandum is found in the record ( DCN 548, Section 3.0).

The pollutant discharges included in the fact sheets were identified from two data sources: ( 1) EPA's Permit Compliance System ( PCS) data ( located on EPA's mainframe); and ( 2) EPA's Toxic Release Inventory ( TRI) data ( obtained through EPA's Risk Screening Environmental 2On April 7, an 111,000 gallon oil spill occurred at the Potomac Electric Power Company ( Pepco) pipeline at the Swanson Creek, epa. gov/ reg3hwmd/ super/ MD/ swanson pepco/ pad. htm Page 2 of 20 Indicators model, see http:// www. epa. gov/ opptintr/ rsei/ whats_ rsei. html.) EPA also performed limited quality assurance checks on the data used for screening ( e. g., by calling facilities to verify data reported to TRI and PCS). These quality assurance checks are documented in addenda to the following reports: ( 1) Development of PCSLoads2000 ( DCN 00620, Section 2.1); and ( 2) Evaluation of RSEI Model Runs ( DCN 618, Section 2.1). As different industries became more important in the analysis, their data were scrutinized, to the extent possible, to determine if any of the hazard estimates were due to non production events ( e. g., oil spills) or to incorrect or suspect data. For example, most of the TRI toxic discharges reported in year 2000 for the Steam Electric point source category ( 40 CFR 423) were related to a non production event ( oil spill) at one facility. 2 This facility reported to TRI a release of 9,500 pounds of polycyclic aromatic compounds ( PACs) in 2000. Removing these toxic pound discharges from the Steam Electric TRI total significantly reduced the estimated TRI toxic pound discharges associated with normal operations.

This memorandum includes unscaled pollutant loads ( i. e., loads for only those facilities that report to these data systems) estimated for point source categories for the year 2000 as of November 30, 2003. Table 1 describes some of the elements EPA used in the industrial category data summary fact sheets ( see Attachment A and B). Page 3 of 20 Table 1: Description of Data Elements Used in EPA's Screening Level Analysis Data Element or Section Description New or Existing " New" refers to an industrial activity that is not currently regulated by existing effluent guidelines or identified as a potential new subcategory of an existing effluent guideline. " Existing" refers to an industry category already regulated under existing effluent limitations guidelines or identified as a potential new subcategory of an existing effluent guideline.

SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: This refers to the Standard Industrial Classification ( SIC) codes that were used to ` roll up' data at the SIC level into this industry category. Whenever possible, EPA attempted to avoid the double counting of SIC level data into two or more industry categories investigated as part of the 304( m) planning process. SIC codes organizes business entities into production based and market based categories identified by a 4 digit code. There are three levels of SIC codes: primary, secondary, and tertiary.

Primary SIC codes are assigned based on the principal product or group of products produced or distributed by an establishment or for services rendered by the plant. Additional SIC codes are assigned for any secondary and tertiary products produced or for services rendered by an establishment. As described in Corrections to Loads Calculated from PCS Discharge Data, DCN 00668, Section 2.1.2, EPA sometimes reclassified a facility's SIC Code to better represent the industrial activities generating wastewater at a facility.

Date( s) Promulgated/

Revised: This refers to the first time EPA promulgated effluent guidelines for this industry category and any subsequent revisions.

Date of Most Recent EAD Study: This refers to the most recent date when EPA completed a study ( not a rulemaking) for this industry category. Table 1: Description of Data Elements Used in EPA's Screening Level Analysis Data Element or Section Description Page 4 of 20 Facility Count Information This section of the summary sheet uses data from four main sources:

 U. S. Census 1997 Economic Census;

 Toxic Release Inventory ( TRI);

 Permit Compliance System ( PCS); and  303( d) Impaired Waters Information.

Notes: EPA was only able to differentiate between direct and indirect dischargers using TRI data ( indirect dischargers do not report to PCS). The PCS data element " All Reporting" identifies all facilities ( major and minor) that report a SIC code. Please note, however, that many minor facilities do not have SIC codes reported in PCS. The PCS data element " w/ Loading Estimates" identifies the number of facilities in this industry category for which EPA was able to calculate pollutant loadings estimates. The term " Indexed to Waterbody Segments" lists the number of facilities in an industrial category that are linked to " Reach File 1" ( RF1) segments in EPA's water quality modeling programs.

Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000) This section reports the estimate of pounds discharged from TRI and PCS in categories of priority,

non conventional, and conventional pollutants. This section reports the straight pollutant pounds discharged ( unweighted) and the toxic pollutant pounds discharged ( weighted through use of EAD's toxic weighting factor and identified as toxic weighted pound equivalents ( TWPE)). Table 1: Description of Data Elements Used in EPA's Screening Level Analysis Data Element or Section Description Page 5 of 20 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000) EPA based the " Hazard Rank" on the total TWPE discharged by an industry. The TWPE reported by all industries were calculated and ranked.

For the " Risk Rank", EPA identified those industries that cumulatively represent 90% of the risk across all industry categories. If an industry category is a component of this 90% of the risk total, then its rank is listed along with the total number of industrial categories that make up this 90% of the risk total. If an industry category is not part of this 90% of the risk total, then ` NA' is reported in the table.

The term "# facilities = 90% hazard" identifies the number of facilities in this industry category that comprise 90% of the hazard for this industrial sector.

The term "# facilities = 90% risk" identifies the number of facilities that comprise 90% of the risk for this industrial sector. EPA was only able to calculate this value for TRI data.

Cause( s) of Impairment This term identifies the reasons for impairment on water segments linked to facilities in this industrial category ( see also "# PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)").

# PCS facilities on imp.

reaches (% tot) This term identifies PCS facilities that discharge to 303( d) listed impaired waters, where at least one " pollutant discharged" is the same as at least one of the pollutants identified as a cause of impairment.

" Pollutant discharged" refers to either PCS parameters or Typical Pollutant Concentrations ( TPCs   pollutants typically discharged by classes of similar facilities). EPA used PCS limits to match facilities with pollutant limits reported in PCS ( usually PCS " major" facilities) to impaired waters. EPA used TPCs to match facilities without limits reported in PCS to impaired waters.

The percentage in parentheses refers to the percentage of the number of PCS facilities in this industrial category on impair reaches ( see above) to the total number of facilities in this industrial category indexed to RF1 segments ( required for water modeling). Page 6 of 20 II. Industrial Category Data Summary Fact Sheets These data summary fact sheets are split into two groups: ( 1) industrial categories currently regulated by effluent guidelines; and ( 2) industrial categories of point sources discharging toxic or non conventional pollutants for which EPA has not published effluent guidelines. Attachment A presents fact sheets for the following industries regulated under a set of existing effluent guidelines or industries potentially identified as a new subcategory under an existing set of effluent guidelines.

1. Battery Manufacturing; 2. Cement Manufacturing; 3. Coal Mining; 4. Electrical and Electronic Components; 5. Food Processing: Dairy and Seafood Subcategories; 6. Hospitals; 7. Inorganic Chemicals; 8. Metal Molding and Casting; 9. Mineral Mining and Processing; 10. Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing; 11. OCPSF: Chemical Formulators; 12. Oil and Gas Extraction: Coal Bed Methane Development; 13. Ore Mining and Dressing; 14. Organic Chemicals, Plastics, and Synthetic Fibers; 15. Petroleum Refining; 16. Petroleum Refining: Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals ( PBST); 17. Phosphate Manufacturing; 18. Steam Electric Power Generation; and 19. Timber Products Processing;

Attachment B presents fact sheets for the following industrial sectors currently not regulated under a set of existing effluent guidelines:

20. Airports ( Deicing); 21. Dental Facilities; 22. Drinking Water Supply and Treatment; 23. Food Service Establishments; 24. Gasoline Service Stations; 25. Independent and Stand Alone Laboratories; 26. Ocean Going Vessels; 27. Printing and Publishing; 28. Stormwater and Urban Runoff; and 29. Wastewater Treatment and Sewerage Systems. Page 7 of 20 ATTACHMENT A:

INDUSTRIAL CATEGORIES CURRENTLY REGULATED BY EFFLUENT GUIDELINES Page 8 of 20 Summary Table for Battery Manufacturing Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 461 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 3691, 3692 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: 1984, 1986 Date of Most Recent EAD Study:

Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 182 98 7 1 26 # Directs 41 # Indirects 68 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 4,505 7,969 0 0 Nonconventional 133,593 78 0 0 Conventional 0 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 26 35 # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 28 Cause( s) of Impairment* SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, METALS, NUTRIENTS # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 2 ( 8%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 9 of 20 Data Summary Table for Battery Manufacturing continued Factor Analyses Results ( How Identified)

Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Substantial changes since prom in ` 84. Consistent queries to EPA regarding categorical determinations.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

6.746B 32,144 127 TBD 298M Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern?

Geographic Concentration? Kansas, Illinois, Indiana Industry Changed since ELG? New kinds of batteries, new metal complexes, new processes Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 10 of 20 Data Summary Table for Cement Manufacturing Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 411; Concrete as a new subcategory SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 3241, 3273 [ Data for SIC 3273 is included in parenthesis].

Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: ' 75, ' 86, ' 95 Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 279 ( 5,253) 103 ( 9) 49 ( 69) 5 ( 2) 67 # Directs 5 ( 7)

# Indirects 1 ( 1)

Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 93 ( 0) 53 ( 0) 1,046 ( 0) 399 ( 0)

Nonconventional 1,453 ( 1,501) 10,774 ( 0) 34,959,445 ( 0) 14,714 ( 0)

Conventional 4,711,937 ( 0)

Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 23 ( NA) 19 ( NA)

# facilities = 90% hazard Risk Rank*

# facilities = 90% risk*

Impairment Rank* 22 Cause( s) of Impairment METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, CHLORINE, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, PATHOGENS, OIL AND GREASE, OTHER CAUSE # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot) 25 ( 37%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 11 of 20 Data Summary Table for Cement Manufacturing ( continued)

Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

24.021B 111,162 3,076 TBD 1.325B Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? See Recommendations section below.

Geographic Concentration? California, Florida, Texas, Pennsylvania, Missouri Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern? Cement Manufacturing in OPEI's Sector Strategies Program Ongoing Agency Activities? Cement Manufacturing included in OPEI's Sector Strategies program, may include water issues; OECA " Sector Note book" available for concrete ( 1995)

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 12 of 20 Data Summary Table for Coal Mining Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR 434 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 1221, 1222, 1231 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: 1985, 2002 Date of Most Recent EAD Study:

Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 1,511 77 146 16 1,649 # Directs 22 # Indirects 0 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 1,125 20,227 8 5 Nonconventional 739,958 2,245 31,563,114 1,380 Conventional 1,966,515 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* 8 of 8 # facilities = 90% risk* 2 Impairment Rank* 5 Cause( s) of Impairment* METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 263 ( 16%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 13 of 20 Data Summary Table for Coal Mining continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns RSEI, Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Stakeholders identified concerns for rainfall events: limits relaxed, catch basing ineffective Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

18.207B 87,793 1,130 TBD 2.026B Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Mercury in processing coal, manganese.

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 14 of 20 Summary Sheet for Electrical and Electronic Components Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR 469 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 3671, 3674 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: 1983, 1985 Date of Most Recent EAD Study:

Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 1,258 163 18 5 47 # Directs 13 # Indirects 104 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 6,243 7,372 18,622 18,345 Nonconventional 4,199,195 2,428 8,431,671 5,369 Conventional 644,402 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 24 16 # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 25 Cause of Impairment NUTRIENTS, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, OTHER CAUSE # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 14 ( 30%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 15 of 20 Summary Sheet for Electrical and Electronic Components continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Identified as an industrial category out of date with current industrial operations ( e. g., drastic changes in the industry such as the development of electronic components for the personal computer.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern?

Geographic Dispersion?

Industry Changed Since ELG? Cathode ray tubes and crystals no longer used Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 16 of 20 Summary Sheet for Food Processing: Dairy and Seafood Subcategories Category Information New or Existing: Guidelines Exist at 40 CFR 405 ( Dairy) and 408 ( Seafood)

SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: Dairy: 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2026; Seafood: 2091, 2092 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: 1974, 1986, 1995 Date of Most Recent EAD Study:

Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 2,670 330 170 13 519 # Directs 35 # Indirects 195 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 5 0 161 29 Nonconventional 3,380,084 5,849 1,009,270 18,936 Conventional 102,392,819 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 64 50 # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 12 Cause of Impairment NUTRIENTS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, OIL AND GREASE, PH, PATHOGENS, OIL AND GREASE # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 104 ( 20%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 17 of 20 Summary Sheet for Food Processing: Dairy and Seafood Subcategories continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Stakeholder concerns for impacts to POTWs and small streams, includes dairy, seafood, and other subcategories Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Nutrients and conventional pollutants such as BOD, fecal coliform.

Geographic Dispersion?

Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT? New automatic grease trap system available.

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003.

Data Summary Table for Hospitals Page 18 of 20 Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR 460 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 8062, 8063 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: 1976, 1995 Date of Most Recent EAD Study: 1989 Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 1,126 1 30 3 87 # Directs 1 # Indirects 1 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 0 0 1 0 Nonconventional 1,486 724 19,952 5 Conventional 5,396 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 23 Cause( s) of Impairment METALS, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 18 ( 21%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 19 of 20 Data Summary Table for Hospitals continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Identified along with dental facilities and laboratories as a significant source of mercury.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

379.2B 4,933,038 4,386 TBD no data Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Possibly mercury, drug/ pharmaceuticals and metabolites.

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT? New automatic grease trap system available.

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 20 of 20 Data Summary Table for Inorganic Chemicals Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 415 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 2812, 2813, 2816, 2819 Date( s) Promul'ed/ Revised: 1982, 1984 Date of Most Recent EAD Study: 1996 Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997 TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 1,410 489 231 92 406 # Directs 132 # Indirects 124 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 177,577 47,601 95,722 544,970 Nonconventional 16,711,203 582,617 2,502,077,560 308,598 Conventional 332,803,920 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 7 4 # facilities = 90% hazard 13 8 Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 2 Cause( s) of Impairment* Metals, Organic Enrichment/ Low D. O., Nutrients, Suspended Solids/ Turbidity, Ammonia, Mercury, Oil and Grease, Copper # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 36 * This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 21 of 20 Data Summary Table for Inorganic Chemicals continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns RSEI, Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Concerns identified for chlor alkali and nitrous oxide subcategories as worth revisiting Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

27.787B 77,157 598 TBD 2.014B Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Mercury and ammonia Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG? New affordable technologies for making chlorine.

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 22 of 20 Data Summary Table for Metal Molding and Casting July 2, 2003 Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 464 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 3321, 3322, 3324, 3325, 3364, 3365, 3366, 3369 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: 1985, 1986 Date of Most Recent EAD Study:

Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 2,502 574 71 8 203 # Directs 109 # Indirects 110 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 27,123 13,782 11,115 4,636 Nonconventional 257,296 31,399 2,008,565 1,197 Conventional 233,663 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 15 23 # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 17 Cause( s) of Impairment METALS, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, UNIONIZED AMMONIA # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 40 ( 20%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 23 of 20 Data Summary Table for Metal Molding and Casting continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record). Identified in EPA's Sediment Inventory ( see Section 2.1 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Recommend consistency with metal finishing industry; EAD receives numerous calls regarding applicability.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

29.116B 227,393 2,601 TBD 1.353B Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Possibly phenols Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities? Metal casting participated in OPEI's " Sustainable Industries Program" now under the Sector Strategies Program.

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. 24 Data Summary Table for Mineral Mining and Processing Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 436 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 1422, 1423, 1429, 1442, 1446, 1455, 1459, 1474, 1475, 1479, 1499 1411, 1481, 3275 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: ' 75, ' 79, ' 95 Date of Most Recent EAD Study:

Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 5,724 18 499 35 3,432 # Directs 1 # Indirects 0 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 0 0 9,200 1,187 Nonconventional 50 0 91,767,088 28,215 Conventional 4,116,305 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 39 15 # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 3 Cause( s) of Impairment METALS, HYDROGEN SULFIDE, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, OIL AND GREASE, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, OTHER CAUSE # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 392 ( 11%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 25 of 20 Data Summary Table for Mineral Mining and Processing continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Stakeholders concerned about need for completeness ( e.. g. add TSS limits) and inconsistent application Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

16.626B 94,239 3,714 TBD 1.810B Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Possibly TSS Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 26 of 20 Data Summary Table for Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 421 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 3331, 3334, 3339, 3341, 2819 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: 1984, 1990 Date of Most Recent EAD Study:

Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 1,102 236 82 56 357 # Directs 86 # Indirects 48 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 52,792 47,389 301,097 154,455 Nonconventional 4,754,969 931,061 213,064,622 280,470 Conventional 107,200,644 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 6 5 # facilities = 90% hazard 6 15 Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank*

Cause( s) of Impairment PESTICIDES, PRIORITY ORGANICS, PCB'S, METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, CHLORINE, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO,, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, THERMAL MODIFICATIONS, RADIATION, OIL AND GREASE, PATHOGENS, CYANIDE, FISH CONSUMPTION ADVIS., OTHER CAUSE # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 124 ( 35 percent)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 27 of 20 Data Summary Table for Nonferrous Metals Manufacturing continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns OST Sediment Inventory; Gulf Hypoxia Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

21.617B 56,935 510 TBD 0.947B Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Sediment contaminants, nutrients Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 28 of 20 Data Summary Table for OCPSF: Chemical Formulators ( New Subcategory)

Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 414; chemical formulating as a new subcategory SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 2841, 2842, 2844, 2851, 2891, 2893, 2899 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: 1989, 1998 Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 6169 1230 127 17 396 # Directs 52 # Indirects 318 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 24,325 3,042 4,421 33,014 Nonconventional 1,206,532 159,285 54,576,837 2,354 Conventional 1,094,004 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank ( out of )* 15 Cause( s) of Impairment* SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO PRIORITY ORGANICS, NONPRIORITY ORGANICS, METALS, OTHER INORGANICS, NUTRIENTS, OIL AND GREASE, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, CYANIDE, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES PATHOGENS, PH, FISH CONSUMPTION ADVIS., OTHER CAUSE # indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 84 ( 21 percent)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 29 of 20 Data Summary Table for OCPSF: Chemical Formulators ( New Subcategory) continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Initially identified during Consent Decree process ( from Plaintiff's Exhibit G)

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern?

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities? Both formulators in general and adhesives specifically are DfE partners  efforts may address water concerns Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 30 of 20 Data Summary Table for Oil & Gas Extraction: Coal Bed Methane Development Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 435; CBM as a new subcategory SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 1311, 1381, 1382, 1389 Date( s) Promul'ed/ Revised: Oil ' 79, ` 93, ' 97, ' 01 Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none on CBM Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997 TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 16,691 1 191 6 262 # Directs 1 # Indirects 0 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 765 6 0 0 Nonconventional 255 1 363,842 267 Conventional 223,371 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 18 Cause( s) of Impairment* PH, METALS, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, OIL AND GREASE # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 53 ( 20%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 31 of 20 Data Summary Table for Oil & Gas Extraction: Coal Bed Methane Development continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Stakeholders identified significant water quality impacts, depleting aquifers, erosion, sedimentation, barium concentrations exceeded, salinization of land, plugging of soils which decreases infiltration/ water's return to groundwater; national effluent guidelines needed.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Total dissolved solids Geographic Concentration? Alabama, Wyoming, New Mexico, Alabama, Montana, and Utah; EAD currently supporting R8 Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 32 of 20 Data Summary Table for Ore Mining and Dressing Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 440 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 1011, 1021, 1031, 1041, 1044, 1061, 1094, 1099, 1081 Date( s) Promul'ed/ Revised: 1982, 1988 Date of Most Recent EAD Study: 1988 Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997 TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 696 96 128 77 135 # Directs 39 # Indirects 2 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 56,436 45,680 122,110 163,265 Nonconventional 434,812 6,947 789,322,770 220,295 Conventional 2,319,198 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 14 6 # facilities = 90% hazard 12 5 Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 21 Cause( s) of Impairment* METALS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, OTHER INORGANICS, PH, OIL AND GREASE, NUTRIENTS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 32 ( 24%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 33 of 20 Data Summary Table for Ore Mining and Dressing continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Stakeholders note continuing water quality impacts; add waste dump seepage, waste rock, spent ore, leach material; definite active/ inactive, closure plans, and remediation.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

11.208B 45,499 394 TBD 2.011B Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern?

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG? Available treatment technology has advanced since ELG.

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 34 of 20 Data Summary Table for Organic Chemicals, Plastics, & Synthetic Fibers Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 414 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 2821, 2823, 2824, 2865, 2869 Date( s) Promul'ed/ Revised: 1987, 1993 Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none since ` 93 Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997 TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 1,570 1421 392 243 578 # Directs 418 # Indirects 492 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 399,266 59,278 1,827,141 1,745,864 Nonconventional 53,726,069 31,539,585 1,912,572,846 505,251 Conventional 436,749,923 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 1 2 # facilities = 90% hazard 4 22 Risk Rank* 6 of 8 # facilities = 90% risk* 6 Impairment Rank* 8 Cause( s) of Impairment* METALS, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, PATHOGENS, UNKNOWN TOXICITY, PESTICIDES, PRIORITY ORGANICS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, PH, OIL AND GREASE, CHLORINE, CYANIDE, OTHER INORGANICS, THERMAL MODIFICATIONS, PATHOGENS # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 205 ( 35%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 35 of 20 Data Summary Table for Organic Chemicals, Plastics, & Synthetic Fibers continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns RSEI; Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia; Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record); Identified in EPA's Sediment Inventory ( see Section 2.1 of the public record); PIRG Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Pollution prevention may have brought significant changes to the industry since the ELG; reason still high on RSEI.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

142.7B 224,921 1,065 TBD 9.345B Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Possibly solvents substituted for regulated ones; and VOCs.

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 36 of 20 Data Summary Table for Petroleum Refining Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 419 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 2911 Date( s) Promul'ed/ Revised: 1982, 1985 Date of Most Recent EAD Study: 1996 Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997 TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 242 182 168 115 195 # Directs 114 # Indirects 40 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 218,067 32,188 325,583 35,295 Nonconventional 19,570,442 2,362,443 293,673,204 162,195 Conventional 47,007,691 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 3 8 # facilities = 90% hazard 36 NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 16 Cause( s) of Impairment* PESTICIDES, PRIORITY ORGANICS, PCB'S, METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, SULFATES, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, PATHOGENS, OIL AND GREASE, FISH CONSUMPTION ADVIS., OTHER CAUSE # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 77 ( 39%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 37 of 20 Data Summary Table for Petroleum Refining continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia, PIRG Report Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Stakeholders say expand list of pollutants: metals, nutrients; also make consistent w/ OCPSF for priority pollutants Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

157.9B 64,789 123 TBD 4.248B Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Selenium, ammonia, BOD, COD Geographic Concentration? Texas, Louisiana, California Industry Changed Since ELG? Potential significant changes since 1982, esp. with water use Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 38 of 20 Data Summary Table for Petroleum Refining: Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 419; PBST as a new subcategory SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 5171 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 9,104 502 496 6 1,147 # Directs 139 # Indirects 41 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 7,430 112 168 3,538 Nonconventional 14,586 7,898 111,417 1,821 Conventional 267,850 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 5 of 6 NA # facilities = 90% hazard 167 NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 4 Cause( s) of Impairment* PRIORITY ORGANICS, PCB'S, METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, CYANIDE, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC, ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, PATHOGENS, OIL AND GREASE, FISH CONSUMPTION ADVIS., OTHER CAUSES # of indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 331 ( 29 percent)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 39 of 20 Data Summary Table for Petroleum Refining: Petroleum Bulk Stations and Terminals continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Gulf Hypoxia; Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Number of facilities, permit writers must depend on BPJ  consistency issues, resource drain ( time consuming)

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

181.6 B 116,215 NA TBD NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Toxic organics, surfactants, metals Geographic Concentration? Tops for facilities/ capacity: TX, CA, NJ, FL, NY, IL, OH Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 40 of 20 Data Summary Table for Phosphate Manufacturing Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 422 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 2874, 2819 Date( s) Promul'ed/ Revised: Date of Most Recent EAD Study:

Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997 TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 728 371 23 15 263 # Directs 104 # Indirects 100 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 105 5 859 140 Nonconventional 44,542 250 77,786,447 1,097,868 Conventional 34,549,881 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 33 3 # facilities = 90% hazard 3 1 Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 14 Cause( s) of Impairment* METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, OIL AND GREASE, PESTICIDES, PRIORITY ORGANICS, PCB'S, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, CHLORINE, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, THERMAL MODIFICATIONS, RADIATION, OIL AND GREASE, OTHER CAUSE # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 93 ( 35%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS Page 41 of 20 data.

Data Summary Table for Phosphate Manufacturing continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern?

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 42 of 20 Data Summary Table for Steam Electric Power Generation Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 423 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 4911 Date( s) Promul'ed/ Revised: 1982, 1983 Date of Most Recent EAD Study: 1996 Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997 TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 6,212 638 835 541 1,249 # Directs 333 # Indirects 21 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 1,227,426 1,139,635 2,947,384 1,944,337 Nonconventional 2,966,298 714,569 13,149,098,074 6,790,253 Conventional 382,527,531 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 4 1 # facilities = 90% hazard 60 66 Risk Rank* 1 of 8 # facilities = 90% risk* 4 Impairment Rank* 2 Cause( s) of Impairment* PESTICIDES, PRIORITY ORGANICS, METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, CHLORINE, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, THERMAL MODIFICATIONS, OTHER HABITAT ALTERATIONS, PATHOGENS, OIL AND GREASE, FISH CONSUMPTION ADVIS., OTHER CAUSE # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 445 ( 36%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 43 of 20 Data Summary Table for Steam Electric Power Generation continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns RSEI; Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record); PIRG Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Applicability for cogeneration units, toxic pollutants in coal pile runoff, growing use of POTW effluent as cooling water; facilities inappropriately exempt; about 1,300 new plants...

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

73.37B 148,686 490 TBD TBD Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Mercury and selenium Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG? Major restructuring, new sources need to be included.

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Recommendations Most of the toxic discharges reported in TRI for this industry are due to non production event ( oil spill) at one facility ( http:// www. epa. gov/ reg3hwmd/ super/ MD/ swanson pepco/ pad. htm) This facility reported a release of 9,500 pounds of polycyclic aromatic compounds ( PACs) in 2000. Removing these toxic pound discharges from the Steam Electric TRI total reduces the TRI toxic pound discharges to approximately 722,000 TWPE.

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 44 of 20 Data Summary Table for Timber Products Processing Category Information New or Existing: Existing Guidelines at 40 CFR Part 429 SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 2421, 2435, 2436, 2491, 2493, 2499 Date( s) Promul'ed/ Revised: Date of Most Recent EAD Study:

Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997 TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 9,272 364 185 11 1,205 # Directs 85 # Indirects 42 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 8,022 9,217 2,013 334 Nonconventional 81,989 5,537,350 4,771,284 626 Conventional 10,211,039 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank 2 29 # facilities = 90% hazard 9 2 Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 10 Cause( s) of Impairment* METALS, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, OIL AND GREASE, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, CHLORINE, THERMAL MODIFICATIONS, PESTICIDES, PRIORITY ORGANICS, OTHER CAUSE # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* 134 ( 11%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 45 of 20 Data Summary Table for Timber Products Processing continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern?

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changed Since ELG?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. ATTACHMENT B:

INDUSTRIAL SECTORS NOT CURRENTLY REGULATED BY EFFLUENT GUIDELINES Page 1 of 20 Data Summary Table for Airports ( Deicing)

Category Information New or Existing: New SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 4581 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: 1999 Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 4,340 NA 34 2 315 # Directs NA # Indirects NA Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority NA NA 28 31 Nonconventional NA NA 2,144,565 435 Conventional 2,121,572 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 19 Cause( s) of Impairment* PRIORITY ORGANICS, METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, FISH CONSUMPTION ADVIS., OTHER CAUSES # indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 44 ( 14 percent)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 2 of 20 Data Summary Table for Airports ( Deicing) continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Stakeholders ( States) expressed concern for a level " playing field" and difficulties modeling oxygen demand.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

$ 9.35 B 121,210 NA TBD NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern?

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changing? Voluntary efforts planned/ discussed in 1999 Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities? Phase II Stormwater regulations being implemented.

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 3 of 20 Data Summary Table for Dental Facilities Category Information New or Existing: New SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 8021 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: N/ A Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 114,178 NA 2 0 NA # Directs NA # Indirects NA Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority NA NA NA NA Nonconventional NA NA NA NA Conventional NA Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* NA Cause( s) of Impairment* NA # PCS facilities on imp. reaches (% tot)* NA * This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 4 of 20 Data Summary Table for Dental Facilities continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Identified as a major nationwide source of mercury discharges to sewage treatment systems, and that cost effective control technologies are readily available.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

48.5 B 641,674 NA TBD NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Mercury Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT? Amalgam separators affordable, straightforward to use.

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 5 of 20 Data Summary Table for Drinking Water Supply & Treatment Category Information New or Existing: New SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 4941 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 3,721 2 899 16 2,029 # Directs 2 # Indirects 0 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 3 2 9,149 8,776 Nonconventional 74 5 99,749,845 602,548 Conventional 9,590,916,107 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 6 Cause( s) of Impairment Matched With Discharges* PRIORITY ORGANICS, METALS, CHLORINE, NUTRUENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRIGHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES. OTHER CAUSES # Indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 243 ( 12%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 6 of 20 Data Summary Table for Drinking Water Supply & Treatment continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Need minimum technology based guidelines, especially for TDS, TSS, pH, treatment chemicals, and for disposal of treatment sludges and backwash waters Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

4.35 B 26,597 NA TBD NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? See Recommendations section.

Geographic Concentration? See Recommendations section.

Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities? EPA/ OGWDW is developing significant new regulations affecting this category.

Additional Information EPA determined that one facility, the Washington Aqueduct, accounts for 99 percent of the total estimated discharge from the 16 major facilities that reported to PCS in 2000. Moreover, the Washington Aqueduct accounted for virtually all estimated discharge of iron. Iron comprised 73 percent of the total toxic weighted pound equivalents released by the 16 major facilities that reported to PCS in 2000. Chlorine, which was the other potential toxic chemical of concern, is currently being used in smaller amounts at the head of treatment  and consequently, there is less chlorine being found in the discharge of drinking water plant backwash.

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 7 of 20 Data Summary Table for Food Service Establishments Category Information New or Existing: New SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 5812 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 423,082 NA 2 0 169 # Directs NA # Indirects NA Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority NA NA 0 0 Nonconventional NA NA 0 0 Conventional 0 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 26 Cause( s) of Impairment* METALS, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, PATHOGENS, OTHER CAUSES # indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 21 ( 12 percent)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 8 of 20 Data Summary Table for Food Service Establishments continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Grease from food service establishments reduces the capacity of sewers and causes or contributes to SSOs and CSOs.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

NA NA NA TBD NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Conventional pollutants specifically grease and other pollutants that interfere with collection systems.

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT? New automatic grease trap system available.

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities?

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 9 of 20 Data Summary Table for Gasoline Service Stations Category Information New or Existing: New SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 5541 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total NA 352 0 1,488 # Directs NA # Indirects NA Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority NA NA 0 0 Nonconventional NA NA 0 0 Conventional 0 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank ( out of )* 7 Cause( s) of Impairment* PRIORITY ORGANICS, METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, PATHOGENS, OIL AND GREASE, OTHER CAUSES # indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 239 ( 16 percent)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 10 of 20 Data Summary Table for Gasoline Service Stations continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

170.7 B 741,040 NA TBD NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern?

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities? UIC program Class V motor vehicle waste disposal wells covers stations that dispose of their service wastewater into septic systems or drywells 1999 rules Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 11 of 20 Data Summary Table for Independent and Stand Alone Laboratories Category Information New or Existing: New SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 8071 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 9,076 NA 3 0 6 # Directs NA # Indirects NA Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority NA NA 0 0 Nonconventional NA NA 0 0 Conventional 0 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 30 Cause( s) of Impairment* METALS # of indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 1 ( 17 percent)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 12 of 20 Data Summary Table for Independent and Stand Alone Laboratories continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Identified along with dental facilities and hospitals as a significant source of mercury. Initially identified during Consent Decree process ( from Plaintiff's Exhibit G)

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

19.3 B 192,532 NA TBD NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Possibly mercury.

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities? Labs related to industries covered by ELGs also covered.

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 13 of 20 Data Summary Table for Ocean Going Vessels Category Information New or Existing: New SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 4412, 4481 ( Impairment Information only for 4412)

Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 631 NA 2 0 7 # Directs NA # Indirects NA Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority NA NA 0 0 Nonconventional NA NA 0 0 Conventional 0 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 29 Cause( s) of Impairment* NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO # of indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 2 ( 29 percent)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 14 of 20 Data Summary Table for Ocean Going Vessels continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Stakeholders noted ballast and bilge water concerns in general; for cruise ships, large vol. of wastewater, graywater, hazardous wastes from printing, photo proc., dry cleaning.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

15.57 B 31,731 NA TBD NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? oil and grease, metals, toxics, and invasive species Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities? Covered by CWA § 312. Ongoing work in OWOW/ OWM. OPEI's Sector Strategies Program includes Ports.

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 15 of 20 Data Summary Table for Printing and Publishing Category Information New or Existing: New SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 27** ( except 2796) ( Impairment information for: 2711, 2732, 2752, 2754, 2759)

Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 61,079 167 22 2 84 # Directs 4 # Indirects 55 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 2,159 275 628 1,405 Nonconventional 11,906 4 7,277,081 842 Conventional 190,409 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 24 Cause( s) of Impairment* METALS, CHLORINE, NUTRIENTS, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO # indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 18 ( 21 percent)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 16 of 20 Data Summary Table for Printing and Publishing continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Initially identified during Consent Decree process ( from Plaintiff's Exhibit G)

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

210.9 B 1,534,299 NA TBD NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern?

Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities? Flexographic printing, gravure printing, lithographic printing, and screen printing listed as DfE partners.

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 17 of 20 Data Summary Table for Stormwater and Urban Runoff Category Information New or Existing: New SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: Includes " Scrap and Waste Materials" in 5093 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 9,088 3 21 0 499 # Directs 2 # Indirects 1 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 277 16 0 0 Nonconventional 10 1 0 0 Conventional 0 Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 13 Cause( s) of Impairment* PRIORITY ORGANICS, METALS, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, OIL AND GREASE # indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 94 ( 19 percent)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 18 of 20 Data Summary Table for Stormwater and Urban Runoff continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns NWQI 2000 Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Need technology based limitations for oil & grease, pesticides, pathogens, metals, and sediment; can't use WQbased effluent limits, rely on BMPs; recommend goal as " reducing pollutants to the maximum extent possible."

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

NA NA NA NA NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? Oil and grease, pesticides, pathogens, metals, and sediment Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities? Covered by CWA § 402( p); OWM has responsibility. Discharges to any type of well are covered in UIC program as Class V Stormwater Well Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003. Page 19 of 20 Data Summary Table for Wastewater Treatment and Sewerage Systems, ( including POTWs and Municipal Treatment Facilities)

Category Information New or Existing: New SIC Code( s) Covered in Whole or in Part: 4952 Date( s) Promulgated/ Revised: N/ A Date of Most Recent EAD Study: none Facility Count Information Facilities Census Data ( Year 1997) TRI/ RSEI Reporters ( Year 2000) PCS ( Year 2000) Indexed to Waterbody Segments* All Reporting w/ Loading Estimates Total 3 11,627 4,113 19,458 # Directs 2 # Indirects 0 Discharge Information ( All for Year 2000)

Pollutant Type & Pounds TRI/ RSEI PCS Other Sources Lbs TWPE Lbs TWPE Priority 0 0 not reliable not reliable Nonconventional 530 258 not reliable not reliable Conventional not reliable Category Ranking ( All for Year 2000)

Hazard Rank NA NA # facilities = 90% hazard NA NA Risk Rank* NA # facilities = 90% risk* NA Impairment Rank* 1 Cause( s) of Impairment* UNKNOWN TOXICITY, PESTICIDES, PRIORITY ORGANICS, NONPRIORITY, ORGANICS, PCB'S, DIOXINS, METALS, UNIONIZED AMMONIA, CHLORINE, CYANIDE, SULFATES, OTHER INORGANICS, NUTRIENTS, PH, SEDIMENT/ SILTATION, ORGANIC ENRICHMENT/ LOW DO, SALINITY/ TDS/ CHLORIDES, THERMAL MODIFICATIONS, FLOW ALTERATION, OTHER HABITAT ALTERATIONS, PATHOGENS, OIL AND, GREASE, TASTE AND ODOR, TOTAL TOXICS, FISH CONSUMPTION ADVIS., OTHER CAUSE # Indexed PCS facilities on impaired reaches (% total indexed)* 4, 341 ( 22%)

* This information was last updated in Summer 2003 and does not reflect any recent corrections to the TRI and PCS data. Page 20 of 20 Data Summary Table for Wastewater Treatment and Sewerage Systems, ( including POTWs and Municipal Treatment Facilities) continued Factor Analyses Results Screening Level Factor 1 Concerns NWQI 2000; Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia; Identified in EPA's impaired waters analysis ( see Section 2.1.4 of the public record).

Screening Level Factor 4 Concerns Need technology based controls for nutrients and metals via either improved secondary treatment or tertiary treatment requirements.

Economic Screen ( 1997 Data)

Sales/ Revenue* # Employees* # Firms* % Small* Capital Expend*

NA NA NA NA NA Noteworthy Issues Pollutants Driving Concern? nutrients ( ammonia, nitrate nitrite, phosphorus) and metals Geographic Concentration?

Industry Changing?

Advances in P2 and WWT?

Economic Trends?

Other Tools to Address Concern?

Ongoing Agency Activities? Covered by CWA § 301( b)( 1)( B) & EPA's municipal program.

Additional Information * This information was last updated in Summer 2003.