[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 208 (Monday, October 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64218-64220]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25300]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-1147]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Preparing a Claim of Categorical Exclusion or an
Environmental Assessment for Submission to the Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the information collection
provisions of our guidance

document entitled, ``Preparing a Claim of Categorical Exclusion or an
Environmental Assessment for Submission to the Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition.''

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by December 27, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville,
MD 20850<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Preparing a Claim of Categorical Exclusion or an Environmental
Assessment for Submission to the Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition (CFSAN) (OMB Control Number 0910-0541)--Extension

    As an integral part of its decision making process, we are
obligated under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) to
consider the environmental impact of our actions, including allowing
notifications for food contact substances to become effective and
approving food additive petitions, color additive petitions, Generally
Recognized As Safe affirmation petitions, requests for exemption from
regulation as a food additive, and actions on certain food labeling
citizen petitions, nutrient content claims petitions, and health claims
petitions. In 1997, we amended our regulations in part 25 (21 CFR part
25) to provide for categorical exclusions for additional classes of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment (62 FR 40570, July 29, 1997). As a
result of that rulemaking, we no longer routinely require submission of
information about the manufacturing and production of our regulated
articles. We also have eliminated the previously required Environmental
Assessment (EA) and abbreviated EA formats from the amended
regulations. Instead, we have provided guidance that contains sample
formats to help industry submit a claim of categorical exclusion or an
EA to CFSAN. The guidance document entitled, ``Preparing a Claim of
Categorical Exclusion or an Environmental Assessment for Submission to
the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition'' identifies,
interprets, and clarifies existing requirements imposed by statute and
regulation, consistent with the Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR 1507.3). It consists of recommendations that do not
themselves create requirements; rather, they are explanatory guidance
for our own procedures in order to ensure full compliance with the
purposes and provisions of NEPA.
    The guidance provides information to assist in the preparation of
claims of categorical exclusion and EAs for submission to CFSAN. The
following questions are covered in this guidance: (1) What types of
industry-initiated actions are subject to a claim of categorical
exclusion? (2) What must a claim of categorical exclusion include by
regulation? (3) What is an EA? (4) When is an EA required by regulation
and what format should be used? (5) What are extraordinary
circumstances? and (6) What suggestions does CFSAN have for preparing
an EA?
    Although CFSAN encourages industry to use the EA formats described
in the guidance because standardized documentation submitted by
industry increases the efficiency of the review process, alternative
approaches may be used if these approaches satisfy the requirements of
the applicable statutes and regulations. We are requesting the
extension of OMB approval for the information collection provisions in
the guidance.
    Description of Respondents: The likely respondents include
businesses engaged in the manufacture or sale of food, food
ingredients, and substances used in materials that come into contact
with food.
    We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                 Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      No. of                          Average
  21 CFR Part 25; Environmental       No. of       responses per   Total annual     burden per      Total hours
      impact considerations         respondents     respondent       responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   25.32(i).................              42               1              42               1              42
Sec.   25.32(o).................               1               1               1               1               1
Sec.   25.32(q).................               2               1               2               1               2
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............              45
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    The above estimates for respondents and numbers of responses are
based on the annualized numbers of petitions and notifications
qualifying for Sec.  25.32(i) and (q) that the Agency has received in
the past 3 years. Please note that, in the past 3 years, there have
been no submissions that requested an action that would have been
subject to the categorical exclusion in Sec.  25.32(o). To avoid
counting this burden as zero, we have estimated the burden for this
categorical exclusion at one respondent making one submission a year
for a total of one annual submission.
    To calculate the estimate for the hours per response values, we
assumed that the information requested in this guidance for each of
these three categorical exclusions is readily available to the
submitter. For the information requested for the exclusion in Sec.
25.32(i), we expect that submitter will need to gather information from
appropriate persons in the submitter's company and to prepare this
information for attachment to the claim for categorical exclusion. We
believe that this effort should take no longer than 1 hour per
submission. For the information requested for the exclusions in Sec.
25.32(o) and (q), the submitters will almost always merely need to copy
existing documentation and attach it to the claim for categorical
exclusion. We believe that collecting this information should also take
no longer than 1 hour per submission.

    Dated: October 22, 2013.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-25300 Filed 10-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 186 (Friday, September 25, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57841-57842]
[FR Doc No: 2015-24411]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket No. FEMA-2015-0001]

Final Flood Hazard Determinations; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency; DHS.

ACTION: Final notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On August 19, 2015, FEMA published in the Federal Register a
final flood hazard determination notice that contained an erroneous
table. This notice provides corrections to that table, to be used in
lieu of the information published at 80 FR 50316. The table provided
here represents the final flood hazard determinations and communities
affected for Norman County, Minnesota, and Incorporated Areas.
    Flood hazard determinations, which may include additions or
modifications of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
regulatory floodways on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) and where
applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports have
been made final for the communities listed in the table below.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that a community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the Federal Emergency Management Agency's (FEMA's)
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report are used by insurance agents and others to calculate appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for buildings and the contents of those
buildings.

DATES: The effective date of September 30, 2015 which has been
established for the FIRM and, where applicable, the supporting FIS
report showing the new or modified flood hazard information for each
community.

ADDRESSES: The FIRM, and if applicable, the FIS report containing the
final flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at the respective Community Map Repository address listed in
the table below and will be available online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov by the effective date indicated
above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final determinations listed below for the new or
modified flood hazard information for each community listed.
Notification of these changes has been published in newspapers of local
circulation and ninety (90) days have elapsed since that publication.
The Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation has resolved any
appeals resulting from this notification.
    This final notice is issued in accordance with section 110 of the
Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4104, and 44 CFR part
67. FEMA has developed criteria for floodplain management in floodprone
areas in accordance with 44 CFR part 60.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the new or revised FIRM and FIS report available at the address
cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service
Center at www.msc.fema.gov. The flood hazard determinations are made
final in the watersheds and/or communities listed in the table below.

Correction

    In the final flood hazard determination notice published at 80 FR
50316 in the August 19, 2015, issue of the Federal Register, FEMA
published a table titled ``Norman County, Minnesota, and Incorporated
Areas''. This table contained inaccurate information as to the
communities affected by the final flood hazard determinations for
Norman County, Minnesota, and Incorporated Areas. In this document,
FEMA is publishing a table containing the accurate information. The
information provided below should be used in lieu of that previously
published.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: September 9, 2015.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Norman County, Minnesota, and Incorporated Areas Docket No.: FEMA-B-1311
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Ada............................  15 East 4th Street, Ada, MN
                                          56510.
City of Borup..........................  203 Main Avenue, Borup, MN
                                          56519.
City of Halstad........................  404 5th Avenue East, Halstad,
                                          MN 56548.
City of Hendrum........................  308 Main Street East, Hendrum,
                                          MN 56550.
City of Perley.........................  205 Main Street, Perley, MN
                                          56574.
City of Shelly.........................  101 West McKinley Avenue,
                                          Shelly, MN 56581.
City of Twin Valley....................  107 2nd Street SW, Twin Valley,
                                          MN 56584.
Unincorporated Areas of Norman County..  16 3rd Avenue East, Ada, MN
                                          56510.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-24411 Filed 9-24-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 34927-34929]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12609]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-6983; Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-012-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH Models 228-100, 228-101, 228-200, 228-201,
228-202, and 228-212 airplanes that would supersede AD 2009-13-04. This
proposed AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as excessive wear on the guide pin
of the power lever or condition lever which could cause functional loss
of the flight idle stop. We are issuing this proposed AD to require
actions to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 18, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH, Dornier 228 Customer Support, P.O. Box
1253, 82231 Wessling, Federal Republic of Germany, telephone: +49 (0)
8153-30-2280; fax: +49 (0) 8153-30-3030; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.ruag.com/. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA, Small
Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816)
329-4148.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
6983; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer,
FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-6983;
Directorate Identifier 2016-CE-012-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    On June 10, 2009, we issued AD 2009-13-04, Amendment 39-15943 (74
FR 29116; June 19, 2009) (``AD 2009-13-04''). AD 2009-13-04 required
actions intended to address an unsafe condition on RUAG Aerospace
Services GmbH Models 228-100, 228-101, 228-200, 228-201, 228-202, and
228-212 airplanes and was based on mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country.
    Since we issued AD 2009-13-04, further analysis has determined that
the inspection interval in cases of no pin replacement can be extended.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD No.: 2009-0031R1, dated March 29, 2016 (referred to after this as
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified
products. The MCAI states:

    Excessive wear on a guide pin of a power lever was detected
during inspections. The failure of a power lever or condition lever
guide pin could cause functional loss of the flight idle stop. This
condition, if not corrected, could lead to inadvertent activation of
the beta mode in flight, possibly resulting in loss of control of
the aeroplane.
    Prompted by this finding, RUAG issued Alert Service Bulletin
(ASB) ASB-228-279 to provide inspection instructions. Consequently,
EASA issued AD 2009-0031 to require repetitive detailed inspections
of the guide pins of the power levers and condition levers, and
replacement of any pin that exceeds the allowable wear-limits.
    Since that AD was issued, further analysis has determined that
the inspection interval, in case of no pin replacement, can be
extended and RUAG published Revision 1 of ASB-228-279, which also
included landings (expressed in this AD as flight cycles--FC) as a
determining factor.
    For the reason described above, this AD revises EASA AD 2009-
0031, amending the compliance times without changing the technical
requirements, and also introducing some editorial changes for
standardization.

You may examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-6983.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH has issued Dornier 228 Alert Service
Bulletin No. ASB-228-279, revision 1, dated September 22, 2015. The
service information describes procedures for repetitive inspections of
the guide pins of the power and condition levers and replacement of
those pins if necessary. This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, they
have notified us of the unsafe condition described in the

MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD
because we evaluated all information and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 18 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 20 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts would cost
about $10 per product.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $30,780, or $1,710 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15943 (74 FR
29116; June 19, 2009), and adding the following new AD:

RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH: Docket No. FAA-2016-6983; Directorate
Identifier 2016-CE-012-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by July 18, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces 2009-13-04, Amendment 39-15943 (74 FR 29116;
June 19, 2009) (``AD 2009-13-04'').

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to RUAG Aerospace Services GmbH Models 228-100,
228-101, 228-200, 228-201, 228-202, and 228-212 airplanes, all
serial numbers, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 76: Engine
Controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD results from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as excessive wear
on the guide pin of the power lever or condition lever which could
cause functional loss of the flight idle stop. The total loss of the
pin could cause loss of the flight idle stop and lead to inadvertent
activation of the beta mode in flight, resulting in possible loss of
control. We are issuing this proposed AD to amend the compliance
times of the guide pin inspections.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions in paragraphs
(f)(1) through (f)(4) of this AD based on a compliance time of hours
time-in-service (TIS) or flight cycles, whichever occurs first:
    (1) For throttle box assemblies with less than 9,600 hours TIS
or 9,600 flight cycles since installed: Inspect the guide pins of
the power and condition levers for excessive wear following the
Accomplishment Instructions in paragraph 2 of Dornier 228 Alert
Service Bulletin No. ASB-228-279, revision 1, dated September 22,
2015, at the following times:
    (i) Initially unless already done within the last 1,200 hours
TIS or 1,200 flight cycles as of July 24, 2009 (the effective date
retained from AD 2009-13-04), upon accumulating 9,600 hours TIS or
9,600 flight cycles, or within the next 100 hours TIS or 100 flight
cycles after July 24, 2009 (the effective date retained from AD
2009-13-04), whichever occurs later, inspect the guide pins of the
power and condition levers for excessive wear; and
    (ii) Repetitively thereafter within 4,800 hours TIS or 4,800
flight cycles since any previous inspection in which the power and
condition levers guide pins were not replaced or within 9,600 hours
TIS or 9,600 flight cycles, whichever occurs first since the
previous inspection in which the power and condition levers guide
pins were replaced.
    (2) For throttle box assemblies with 9,600 hours TIS or 9,600
flight cycles or more but less than 13,200 hours TIS or 13,200
flight cycles since installed: Inspect the guide pins of the power
and condition levers for excessive wear within the next 1,200 hours
TIS or 1,200 flight cycles after July 24, 2009 (the effective date
retained from AD 2009-13-04) following the Accomplishment
Instructions in paragraph 2 of Dornier 228 Alert Service Bulletin
No. ASB-228-279, revision 1, dated September 22, 2015; and
    (i) Repetitively inspect the guide pins of the power and
condition levers for excessive wear thereafter within 4,800 hours
TIS or 4,800 flight cycles since any previous inspection in which
the power and condition levers guide pins were not replaced; or
    (ii) Repetitively inspect the guide pins of the power and
condition levers for excessive wear within 9,600 hours TIS or 9,600
flight cycles, whichever occurs first, since the previous inspection
in which the power and condition levers guide pins were replaced.
    (3) For throttle box assemblies with 13,200 hours TIS or 13,200
flight cycles or more since installed: Within 100 hours TIS or
flight cycles after July 24, 2009 (the effective date retained from
AD 2009-13-04) inspect the guide pins of the power and condition
levers for excessive wear following the Accomplishment Instructions
in paragraph 2 of Dornier 228 Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB-228-
279, revision 1, dated September 22, 2015, at the following times:
    (i) Initially within the next 100 hours TIS or 100 flight cycles
after July 24, 2009 (the effective date retained from AD 2009-13-
04); and
    (ii) Repetitively thereafter within 4,800 hours TIS or 4,800
flight cycles since any previous inspection in which the power and
condition levers guide pins were not replaced or within 9,600 hours
TIS or 9,600 flight cycles since the previous inspection in which
the power and condition levers guide pins were replaced.

    (4) For all throttle box assemblies: Before further flight after
any inspection required in paragraph (f)(1), (f)(2), or (f)(3) of
this AD, replace any guide pin that exceeds the acceptable wear-
limits as defined in paragraph 4.1 of Dornier 228 Alert Service
Bulletin No. ASB-228-279, revision 1, dated September 22, 2015.
    Note 1 to paragraph (f)(1), (f)(2) and (f)(3) of this AD: If the
flight cycles or hours TIS of the throttle box assembly is unknown,
use the hours TIS of the airplane to determine the compliance time
for the inspection.

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Karl Schletzbaum, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on
any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate
principal inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office
(FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, a federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person
is not required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a collection of information
subject to the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless
that collection of information displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this information collection is
2120-0056. Public reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 5 minutes per response, including the
time for reviewing instructions, completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Comments concerning the accuracy of this
burden and suggestions for reducing the burden should be directed to
the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave. SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn:
Information Collection Clearance Officer, AES-200.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.:
2009-0031R1, dated March 29, 2016, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-6983. For service
information related to this AD, contact RUAG Aerospace Services
GmbH, Dornier 228 Customer Support, P.O. Box 1253, 82231 Wessling,
Federal Republic of Germany, telephone: +49 (0) 8153-30-2280; fax:
+49 (0) 8153-30-3030; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet: http://www.ruag.com/. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane
Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on May 20, 2016.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-12609 Filed 5-31-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 202 (Friday, October 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 58654]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23057]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9058-9]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.
Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) Filed October
8, 2021 10 a.m. EST Through October 18, 2021 10 a.m. EST Pursuant to 40
CFR 1506.9.
Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20210155, Draft, RUS, OK, Skeleton Creek Solar and Battery
Storage Project, Garfield County, Oklahoma, Comment Period Ends: 12/06/
2021, Contact: Kristen Bastis<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20210156, Draft, USFS, BLM, ID, Husky 1 North Dry Ridge
Phosphate Mine, Comment Period Ends: 12/06/2021, Contact: Wes Gilmer
208-478-6369.

Amended Notice

EIS No. 20210135, Draft, USFS, MN, Lutsen Mountains Ski Area Expansion
Project, Comment Period Ends: 12/09/2021, Contact: Michael Jimenez 218-
626-4383. Revision to FR Notice Published 09/10/2021; Extending the
Comment Period from 10/25/2021 to 12/09/2021.

    Dated: October 18, 2021.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2021-23057 Filed 10-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 222)]
[Notices]
[Page 70738-70739]
[DOCID:fr18no10-79]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER11-2021-000]

Domtar A.W. LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based
Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

November 8, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Domtar A.W. LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket

authorization, under 18 CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities
and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is November 29, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-29034 Filed 11-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 15, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 219)]
[Notices]
[Page 69334-69336]
[DOCID:fr15no05-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

November 8, 2005.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-100-000.
    Applicants: Hunlock Creek Energy Ventures.
    Description: Hunlock Creek Energy Ventures submits Rate Schedule
FERC No. 2 which specifies the revenue requirement for providing cost-
based Reactive Support and Voltage Control form Generation Source
Service.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051103-0086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-116-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc.
    Description: Entergy Services, Inc on behalf of Entergy Gulf
States, Inc submits the rate schedules providing for cost-based power
sales for full requirements service to Caldwell, Newton, and
Kirbyville, TX.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0102.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-117-000.
    Applicants: FirstEnergy Solutions Corp.
    Description: FirstEnergy Solutions Corp submits Power Supply
Agreements for the sale of capacity and energy by Solutions to certain
affiliated electric utility companies.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-118-000.
    Applicants: Devon Power LLC, Middletown Power LL, and Montville
Power LLC.
    Description: Devon Power, LLC et al submit FERC Electric Tariff
Original Volume No. 3 which consists of unexecuted Cost of Service
Agreements.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0295.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-119-000.
    Applicants: San Diego Gas & Electric Company.
    Description: San Diego Gas & Electric Co submits its forecast
revenue requirement and proposed rates for the service year 2006
Reliability Services costs.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0323.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-120-000.
    Applicants: Duke Power, Division of Duke Energy Corp.
    Description: Duke Power, a division of Duke Energy Corp submits the
Catawba Nuclear Station Joint Ownership Support Agreement and the
McGuire Reliability Exchange Agreement with Piedmont Municipal Power
Agency.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0003.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-121-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc. and Bangor Hydro-Electric Company.
    Description: ISO New England Inc and Bangor Hydro submits an
executed Standard Large Generator Interconnection Agreement by and
among ISO-NE, Bangor Hydro and Georgia Pacific.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-123-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Co. submits for filing of
the revision to Transmission Owner Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Second
Revised Volume No. 6.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0002.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-124-000.
    Applicants: Kentucky Power Company.
    Description: Kentucky Power Co submits a notice of cancellation of
its Service Agreement No. 1 under FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume
No. 2.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051103-0140.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-126-000.
    Applicants: Ohio Edison Company.
    Description: Ohio Edison Company submits a notice of cancellation
of a Power Interchange Agreement with Monongahela Power Co et al dated
as of 3/18/87.

    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051103-0137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-127-000.
    Applicants: FirstEnergy Service Company.
    Description: FirstEnergy Service Co submits a notice of
cancellation of the Master Facility Lease dated as of 1/1/01 with
FirstEnergy Generation Corp and FirstEnergy Operating Companies.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051103-0141.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-128-000.
    Applicants: Ohio Edison Company.
    Description: Ohio Edison Co submits a notice of cancellation of a
Power Supply Agreement with Potomac Electric Power Co dated as of 3/18/
87.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051103-0135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-130-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits Fifth Revised Sheet
No. et al to FERC Electric Tariff Sixth Revised Volume No. 1 to
effectuate a change by a transmission customer receiving network
integration transmission service.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051103-0138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-131-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Arizona Public Service Co submits Original Sheet Nos.
243A and 348A to FERC Electric Tariff, Thirteenth Revised Volume No. 2
in response to FERC's Order 661.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051103-0139.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-133-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnecton LLC submits an unexecuted Network
Integration Transmission Service Agreement with the City of Geneva, IL
and amendment to the existing Interconnection Service Agreement.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051103-0194.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-135-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corporation.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corp submits supplement
to FERC Rate Schedule No. 194--Facilities Agreement with the Steuben
Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0263.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-136-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corp submits supplement
to Rate Schedule FERC No. 226--Facilities Agreement with Otsego
Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0264.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-137-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corp submits a
supplement to FERC Rate Schedule No. 227--Facilities Agreement with
Municipal Board of the Village of Bath.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0302.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-138-000.
    Applicants: New York State Electric & Gas Corp.
    Description: New York State Electric & Gas Corp submits a
supplement to FERC Rate Schedule No. 228--Facilities Agreement with the
Village of Groton.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0265.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-139-000.
    Applicants: Inland Power & Light Company.
    Description: Inland Power & Light Co advises that due to amendments
of section 201(f) of the Federal Power Act, it is no longer a public
utility and requests that Rate Schedule FERC Nos.1 & 2 be withdrawn.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0298.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-140-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power.
    Description: American Electric Power on behalf of Indiana Michigan
Power Co submits a Cost-Based Formula Rate Agreement for Baseload
Electric Service between American Electric Power Service Corporation
and the Indiana Municipal Power Agency.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0314.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-141-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Company.
    Description: American Electric Power Service Corp submits a
proposed amendment to the System Integration Agreement among the
indicated operating companies.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0266.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-143-000.
    Applicants: Pepperell Realty LLC.
    Description: Petition for acceptance of initial rate schedule,
waivers and blanket authority submitted by Pepperell Realty LLC.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0270.
    Comment Date: p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-144-000.
    Applicants: Progress Energy Service Company, LLC.
    Description: Progress Energy Service Co, LLC on behalf of Carolina
Power & Light Co dba Progress Energy Carolinas, Inc and Florida Power
Corporation, submits revised tariff sheets adopting the Revised
Transmission Loading Relief procedures by NERC, in compliance with
FERC's 10/7/05 Order.
    Filed Date: 11/01/2005.
    Accession Number: 20051104-0317.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on Tuesday, November 22, 2005.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other and the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access

who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-6278 Filed 11-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P