[Federal Register: April 22, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 78)]
[Notices]
[Page 21681-21682]
[DOCID:fr22ap08-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57672; File No. SR-NYSE-2008-28]

Self-Regulatory Organizations: New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change Amending NYSE Rule 472 (Communications With the Public)

April 16, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on April 11, 2008, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons and is
simultaneously approving the proposal on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend, retroactively effective to April 7,
2008, NYSE Rule 472 (Communications with the Public) concerning member
organization disclosure and supervisory review obligations when
distributing or making available third-party research reports. The
proposed rule change conforms NYSE's version of Rule 472 to approved
amendments filed by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') to its incorporated version of NYSE Rule 472. The text of
the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site
(http://www.nyse.com), at the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On July 30, 2007, NASD and NYSE Regulation, Inc. consolidated their
member firm regulation operations into a combined organization,
FINRA.\4\ Pursuant to FINRA's new regulatory responsibilities, FINRA
amended FINRA's incorporated NYSE Rule 472 regarding member
organization disclosure and supervisory review obligations when
distributing or making available third-party research reports.\5\ In
order to maintain Rule 472 as a Common Rule, the NYSE proposes to amend
its version of the Rule to conform to the recently approved changes to
FINRA's incorporated NYSE Rule 472. The effective date of the proposed
rule change is April 7, 2008, which is the operative date of FINRA's
identical amendments to its incorporated version of NYSE Rule 472.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act, NYSE, NYSE Regulation,
Inc., and NASD entered into an agreement (the ``Agreement'') to
reduce regulatory duplication for firms that are members of FINRA
and also members of NYSE on or after July 30, 2007 (``Dual
Members''), by allocating to FINRA certain regulatory
responsibilities for selected NYSE rules. The Agreement includes a
list of all of those rules (``Common Rules'') for which FINRA has
assumed regulatory responsibilities. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 56148 (July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42146 (August 1, 2007)
(File No. 4-544) (Notice of Filing and Order Approving and Declaring
Effective a Plan for the Allocation of Regulatory Responsibilities).
The Common Rules are the same NYSE rules that FINRA has incorporated
into its rulebook. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56417
(July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42166 (August 1, 2007) (SR-NASD-2007-054)
(Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change to Incorporate Certain NYSE Rules Relating to
Member Firm Conduct). Paragraph 2(b) of the 17d-2 Agreement sets
forth procedures regarding proposed changes by either NYSE or FINRA
to the substance of any of the Common Rules.
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 57279 (February 6,
2008), 73 FR 8089 (February 12, 2008) (SR-FINRA-2007-011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in that
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove
impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and
the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2008-28 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-28. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and on its
Internet Web site at http://www.nyse.com. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-28 and should be submitted on
or before May 13, 2008.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
the Proposed Rule Change

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\7\ In
particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ which requires, among
other things, that the Exchange's rules be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ In approving this proposal, the Commission has considered
its impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15
U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change would make the Exchange's NYSE Rule 472
identical to the version that FINRA administers. The FINRA version was
approved by the Commission.\9\ The Commission also believes that the
proposed rule change comports with the provisions of the 17d-2
Agreement, as approved by the Commission. In this Agreement, FINRA and
NYSE agreed to promptly propose conforming changes, absent a
disagreement about the substance of a proposed rule change, to ensure
that such rules continue to be Common Rules as defined in the
Agreement. In this regard, the Commission believes it is appropriate
for the proposed rule to be effective retroactively as of April 7,
2008, which is the date FINRA's identical amendments became
effective.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See supra note 5.
    \10\ FINRA Regulatory Notice 08-16 (April 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds good cause, consistent with Section 19(b)(2)
of the Act,\11\ for approving this proposed rule change before the
thirtieth day after publication of notice thereof in the Federal
Register. This approval allows the proposed rule change to take effect
without delay. FINRA's change to its version of NYSE Rule 472 was
published for comment and approved by the Commission.\12\ Interested
persons were provided the opportunity to submit comments on rule text
that is identical to the Exchange's proposal, and FINRA responded to
those comments that were received. The Commission believes that the
Exchange's proposal raises no new regulatory or substantive issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \12\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\13\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2008-28), be, and it
hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-8602 Filed 4-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: October 31, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 210)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 63738]
[DOCID:fr31oc06-27]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2006-0747, FRL-8231-6]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Antelope
Valley Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Antelope Valley
Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD) portion of the California
State Implementation Plan (SIP). Under authority of the Clean Air Act
as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), we are proposing to approve local
rules that address permitting requirements.

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by November 30, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2006-0747, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail or deliver: Gerardo Rios (Air-3), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov
, including any personal information provided,

unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through
http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous

access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the public comment. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA

Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may
be publicly available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted
material), and some may not be publicly available in either location
(e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business hours with the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Al Petersen, Rulemaking Office (AIR-
4), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the approval of
local AVAQMD Rule 442. In the Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register, we are approving this local rule in a direct final
action without prior proposal because we believe this SIP revision is
not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. We do not
plan to open a second comment period, so anyone interested in
commenting should do so at this time. If we do not receive adverse
comments, no further activity is planned. For further information,
please see the direct final action.

    Dated: September 1, 2006.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
 [FR Doc. E6-18172 Filed 10-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 147 (Tuesday, July 31, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 45417]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18524]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket ID PHMSA-2012-0175]

Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Assessment for
Public Comment for the Longhorn Pipeline Reversal Project

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Availability of Draft Environmental Assessment for
Public Comment for the Longhorn Pipeline Reversal Project.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA), 42 U.S.C. 4321-4347, and the Council on Environmental Quality
NEPA implementing regulations, 40 CFR Parts 1500-1508, the Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) is announcing the
availability of and requesting comments on the Draft Environmental
Assessment (Draft EA) for the Longhorn Pipeline Reversal Project
(Proposed Project).

DATES: Submit any comments regarding the Draft EA no later than
September 14, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Comments should reference the docket number PHMSA-2012-0175
at the beginning of the comment. Comments are posted without changes or
edits to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. There is a privacy statement published on http://www.regulations.gov. Comments may be submitted in the following ways:
    E-Gov Web Site: http://www.regulations.gov. This site allows the
public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice issued by any
agency.
    Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590. If you submit your
comments by mail, please submit two copies. To receive confirmation
that PHMSA has received your comments, please include a self-addressed
stamped postcard.
    Hand Delivery: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
    Fax: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    PHMSA has posted the Draft EA at http://www.regulations.gov in
docket number PHMSA-2012-0175.
    The Draft EA is also available for inspection at the following
public libraries:
     Austin Public Library--Twin Oaks Branch, 1800 South 5th
Street, Austin, TX 78704,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Collier Regional Library, 6200 Pinemont Drive, Houston,
TX, 77092,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Abilene Public Library-South Branch, 1401 South Danville
Drive, Abilene, TX 79605,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     El Paso Main Library, 501 North Oregon Street, El Paso,
TX, 79901,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Ector County Public Library, 321 West 5th Street, Odessa,
TX, 79761,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amelia Samaras, Attorney, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, Office of the Chief Counsel,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590; by phone at 202-366-
4362; or email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Longhorn Pipeline runs from El Paso,
Texas to Houston, Texas and is owned and operated by Magellan Pipeline
Company, L.P. (Magellan). The Longhorn Pipeline currently transports
refined petroleum products from east to west (Houston to El Paso). The
Proposed Project would convert the segment of the Longhorn Pipeline
from Crane, Texas to East Houston, Texas to crude oil service and
reverse the flow so that crude oil would flow from west to east (Crane
to Houston). At Crane, refined products would enter the pipeline and
move west to El Paso. The refined products would enter the Longhorn
Pipeline via an existing pipeline segment that connects the Longhorn
Pipeline to the existing Orion West Pipeline located to the north of
the Longhorn Pipeline. The Orion West Pipeline runs from Frost, Texas
to El Paso and is also owned and operated by Magellan.
    PHMSA is responsible for regulating the transportation of hazardous
liquids via pipeline. PHMSA issues and enforces pipeline safety
regulations that dictate requirements for construction, design,
testing, operation, and maintenance of natural gas and hazardous liquid
(including crude oil, petroleum products, and anhydrous ammonia)
pipelines. PHMSA does not typically serve as lead agency for pipeline
construction projects, as it has no authority over pipeline siting and
does not issue any approval or authorization to commence a pipeline
construction project. However, a settlement agreement specific to this
action titled: ``The Longhorn Mitigation Plan'' (LMP) resulted from
litigation associated with changes to the Longhorn Pipeline in 1999.
The LMP provides PHMSA with broader responsibility and oversight of the
Longhorn Pipeline.
    The Proposed Project would require upgrades to the pipeline and
would include construction of a six-mile pipeline segment in El Paso
and a 2.5-mile pipeline segment in Houston. Modifications and upgrades
to existing infrastructure to facilitate reversal and increased
capacity, such as new pump stations and terminals, would occur at
various locations along the Longhorn and Orion Pipelines' right-of-
ways. Although not originally included in the LMP, activities along the
Orion West Pipeline and the segment from Odessa to Crane that would
take place as a result of the Proposed Project are analyzed in this
Draft EA as connected actions.
    This Draft EA analyzes the changes that would take place as a
result of the Proposed Project and how the changes could impact the
human environment during construction, normal operations, and in the
unlikely event of a release. PHMSA has also analyzed the condition of
the Longhorn Pipeline and how the change in product and direction would
affect the pipeline.

Linda Daugherty,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-18524 Filed 7-30-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register: June 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 123)]
[Notices]
[Page 31076-31077]
[DOCID:fr29jn09-110]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60154; File No. SR-CTA-2008-01]

Consolidated Tape Association; Notice of Filing of the Eleventh
Charges Amendment to the Second Restatement of the Consolidated Tape
Association Plan To Waive the Automatic Annual Increase in the
Enterprise Cap for 2008

June 19, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 11A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 608 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 7, 2009, the Consolidated Tape Association (``CTA'') Plan
Participants (``Participants'') \3\ filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposal to amend the Second
Restatement of the CTA Plan (the ``CTA Plan'').\4\ The proposal
represents the eleventh charges amendment to the Plan (``Eleventh
Charges Amendment'') and reflects changes unanimously adopted by the
Participants. The Eleventh Charges Amendment would waive the Automatic
Annual Increase for 2008 in the maximum monthly charge that a broker-
dealer is required to pay in respect of the aggregate amount of Network
A display-device charges and per-quote-packet charges that a broker-
dealer pays in respect of nonprofessional subscribers that maintain
brokerage accounts with the broker-dealers (the ``Enterprise Cap'').
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments from
interested persons on the proposed Eleventh Charges Amendment to the
CTA Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
    \2\ 17 CFR 242.608.
    \3\ Each Participant executed the proposed amendment. The
Participants are the American Stock Exchange LLC (n/k/a NYSE Amex
LLC); Boston Stock Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.);
Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated; Chicago Stock
Exchange, Inc.; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.,
International Securities Exchange, LLC; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
National Stock Exchange, Inc.; New York Stock Exchange LLC
(``NYSE''); NYSE Arca, Inc.; and Philadelphia Stock Exchange, Inc.
(n/k/a NASDAQ OMX PHLX, Inc.).
    \4\ The proposal was originally submitted on June 19, 2008.
However, it was refiled on June 7, 2009 with appropriate exhibits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Rule 608(a)

A. Description and Purpose of the Amendment

    The Plan currently caps the maximum monthly charge that a broker-
dealer is required to pay in respect of the aggregate amount of: (1)
Network A display-device charges for devices that the broker-dealer's
officers, partners and employees use; plus (2) Network A display-device
and per-quote-packet charges that the broker-dealer pays in respect of
services that it provides to nonprofessional subscribers that are
brokerage account customers of the broker-dealer.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Enterprise Cap found in Schedule A-1 of Exhibit E to the CTA
Plan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Footnote 5 to Schedule A-1 of Exhibit E to the CTA Plan subjects
the Enterprise Cap to an automatic annual increase. The automatic
annual increase is equal to ``the percentage increase in the annual
composite share volume for the preceding calendar year, subject to a
maximum annual increase of five percent.''
    Through this amendment, the Participants propose to amend the CTA
Plan to waive the automatic annual increase in the Enterprise Cap for
2008. As a result, the monthly fee will remain at $660,000 for 2008,
the same amount as for 2007. The waiver applies to the Enterprise Cap
only, and not to the ``Television Ticker Maximum,'' also set forth in
Footnote 6 to Schedule A-1 of Exhibit E to the CTA Plan. The amendment
also proposes to update Footnote 6 by applying the automatic annual
increase to the ``Television Ticker Maximum,'' by bringing that monthly
fee to $157,000 for 2008.
    The text of the proposed Amendment is available on the CTA's Web
site (http://www.nysedata.com/cta), at the principal office of the CTA,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

B. Additional Information Required by Rule 608(a)

1. Governing or Constituent Documents
    Not applicable.
2. Implementation of the Amendment
    The Participants propose to implement the change upon receipt of
Commission approval of the Amendment.
3. Development and Implementation Phases
    See Item I(B)(2) above.
4. Analysis of Impact on Competition
    The amendment will impose no burden on competition.
5. Written Understanding or Agreements Relating to Interpretation of,
or Participation in, Plan
    The Participants have no written understandings or agreements
relating to interpretation of the CTA Plan as a result of the
amendment.
6. Approval by Sponsors in Accordance With Plan
    Under Section IV(b) of the CTA Plan, each Plan Participant must
execute a written amendment to the CTA Plan before the amendment can
become effective. The amendment is so executed.
7. Description of Operation of Facility Contemplated by the Proposed
Amendment
a. Terms and Conditions of Access
    Not applicable.
b. Method of Determination and Imposition, and Amount of, Fees and
Charges
    Not applicable.
c. Method of Frequency of Processor Evaluation
    Not applicable.
d. Dispute Resolution
    Not applicable.

II. Rule 601(a)

A. Equity Securities for Which Transaction Reports Shall be Required by
the Plan.

    Not applicable.

B. Reporting Requirements

    Not applicable.

C. Manner of Collecting, Processing, Sequencing, Making Available and
Disseminating Last Sale Information

    Not applicable.

D. Manner of Consolidation

    Not applicable.

E. Standards and Methods Ensuring Promptness, Accuracy and Completeness
of Transaction Reports

    Not applicable.

F. Rules and Procedures Addressed to Fraudulent or Manipulative
Dissemination

    Not applicable.

G. Terms of Access to Transaction Reports

    Not applicable.

H. Identification of Marketplace Execution

    Not applicable.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed
Eleventh Charges Amendment is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CTA-2008-01 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CTA-2008-01. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the Plan amendment that are filed
with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the
Plan amendment between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the CTA Plan amendment also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the CTA. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CTA-2008-01 and should be
submitted on or before July 20, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(27).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-15223 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21093-21094]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8439]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL12-53-000]

Seminole Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Florida Power & Light
Company; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on March 30, 2012, pursuant to sections 206, 306,
and 309 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e, 825e, and 825h, and
Rule 206 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission)
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 (2011), Seminole
Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Complainant) filed a complaint alleging
that Florida Power & Light Company (Respondent) violated its open
access transmission tariff (OATT) in the implementation of OATT
Schedule 4 and should refund to the Complainant the overcharges levied
since August 2007 (plus interest).
    Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served on
the contacts for Respondent as listed on the Commission's list of
Corporate Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public

Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription'' link on
the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 19, 2012.

    Dated: April 3, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8439 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 217)]
[Notices]
[Page 58269]
[DOCID:fr12no09-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP10-9-000]

Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Notice of Application

November 4, 2009.
    Take notice that on October 23, 2009, Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company (Tennessee), 1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002, filed
with the Commission an application under section 7(b) of the Natural
Gas Act (NGA) for authorization to abandon by sale to Tauber Pipeline,
L.L.C. (Tauber) thirty-four small natural gas supply laterals attached
to Tennessee's mainline in South Texas, and related facilities
(collectively, the Facilities). Tennessee states that no construction,
removal or modifications of the Facilities is required to effectuate
the abandonment and sale of the Facilities to Tauber, all as more fully
set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and
open to public inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the Web at
http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding the petition should be directed to counsel
for Tennessee, Susan T. Halbach, Senior Counsel, Tennessee Gas Pipeline
Company, 1001 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas 77002, or via telephone
at<PHONE_NUMBER>, facsimile number<PHONE_NUMBER>, or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify Federal and State agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all Federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Comment Date: November 25, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-27120 Filed 11-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P