[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 1 (Monday, January 4, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 104-106]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29082]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-N-1129]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; National Agriculture and Food Defense Strategy Survey

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
an opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information, and
to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This
notice solicits comments on the information collection requirements for
a voluntary survey for the Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS), the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and the Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), which will inform the FDA Food Safety
Modernization Act (FSMA), National Agriculture and Food Defense
Strategy (NAFDS) Report to Congress. The proposed survey will be used
to determine what food defense activities, if any, State, local,
territorial, and/or tribal (SLTT) agencies have completed to date. The
information will be compared to the initial baseline data collected by
State(s) in 2018.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by March 5, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows. Please note that late,
untimely filed comments will not be considered. Electronic comments
must be submitted on or before March 5, 2021. The https://www.regulations.gov electronic filing system will accept comments until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Time at the end of March 5, 2021. Comments received
by mail/hand delivery/courier (for written/paper submissions) will be
considered timely if they are postmarked or the delivery service
acceptance receipt is on or before that date.

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:

     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2018-N-1129 for ``Agency Information Collection Activities;
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; National Agriculture and Food
Defense Strategy Survey.'' Received comments, those filed in a timely
manner (see ADDRESSES), will be placed in the docket and, except for
those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between
9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A-12M, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

National Agriculture and Food Defense Strategy Survey

OMB Control Number 0910-0855--Extension

    We are seeking OMB approval of the NAFDS under section 108 of FSMA.
This is a voluntary survey of SLTT governments intended to gauge
government activities in food and agriculture defense from intentional
contamination and emerging threats. The collected information will be
included in the mandatory NAFDS followup Report to Congress. The
authority for us to collect the information derives from the
Commissioner of Food and Drugs' authority provided in section
1003(d)(2)(c) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
393(d)(2)(c)).
    Protecting the nation's food and agriculture supply against
intentional contamination and other emerging threats is an important
responsibility shared by SLTT governments as well as private sector
partners. On January 4, 2011, the President signed into law FSMA. FSMA
focuses on ensuring the safety of the U.S. food supply by shifting the
efforts of Federal regulators from response to prevention and
recognizes the importance of strengthening existing collaboration among
all stakeholders to achieve common public health and security goals.
FSMA identifies some key priorities for working with partners in areas
such as reliance on Federal, State, and local agencies for inspections;
improving foodborne illness surveillance; and leveraging and enhancing
State and local food safety and defense capacities. Section 108 of FSMA
(NAFDS) requires HHS and USDA, in coordination with DHS, to work
together with State, local,

territorial, and tribal governments to monitor and measure progress in
food defense.
    In 2015, the initial NAFDS Report to Congress detailed the specific
Federal response to food and agriculture defense goals, objectives, key
initiatives, and activities that HHS, USDA, DHS, and other stakeholders
planned to accomplish to meet the objectives outlined in FSMA. The
NAFDS charts a direction for how Federal Agencies, in cooperation with
SLTT governments and private sector partners, protect the nation's food
supply against intentional contamination. Not later than 4 years after
the initial NAFDS Report to Congress (2015), and every 4 years
thereafter (i.e., 2019, 2023, 2027, etc.), HHS, USDA, and DHS are
required to revise and submit an updated report to the relevant
committees of Congress.
    FDA is the Agency primarily responsible for obtaining the
information from Federal and SLTT partners to complete the NAFDS Report
to Congress. An interagency working group will conduct the survey and
collect and update the NAFDS as directed by FSMA, including developing
metrics and measuring progress for the evaluation process.
    The survey of Federal and State partners will be used to determine
what food defense activities, if any, Federal and/or SLTT agencies have
completed (or are planning on completing) from 2021 to 2025. Planning
for the local, territorial, and tribal information collections will
commence during this period of renewal. The survey will continue to be
repeated approximately every 2 to 4 years, as described in section 108
of FSMA. The NAFDS survey is being administered for the purpose of
monitoring progress in food and agricultural defense by government
agencies.
    A purposive sampling strategy is employed, such that the government
agencies participating in food and agricultural defense are asked to
respond to the voluntary survey. Food defense leaders responsible for
conducting food defense activities during a food emergency for their
jurisdiction are identified and will receive an emailed invitation to
complete the survey online; they will be provided with a web link to
the survey. The survey will be conducted electronically on the FDA.gov
web portal, and results will be analyzed by the interagency working
group.
    Description of Respondents: Respondents to this collection are SLTT
government representatives (survey respondents) who are food defense
leaders responsible for conducting food defense activities during a
food emergency for their jurisdictions.
    We estimate the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                     Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Number of
               Activity                     Number of        responses per       Total annual         Average burden per response         Total hours
                                           respondents         respondent         responses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SLTT Surveys..........................               500                  1                500   0.33 (20 minutes)...................               165
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    The FDA Office of Partnerships reviewed the questionnaire and
provided the estimate of time to complete the survey. The total burden
is based on our previous experiences conducting surveys. The burden has
been revised to reflect the total number of states and possible number
of local, tribal, and territorial entities that may partake of the
survey. Based on a review of the information collection since our last
request for OMB approval, we have increased our burden estimate by 149
hours (from 16.17 to 165 hours) and 451 respondents (from 49 to 500
respondents).

    Dated: December 29, 2020.
Lauren K. Roth,
Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2020-29082 Filed 12-31-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


MEMORANDUM

DATE: 11/24/14

FROM: 		Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4

TO:CLEAN POWER PLAN FOR EXISTING POWER PLANTS; DOCKET ID: OAR - 2013-0602

SUBJECT:DISCUSSION OF THE CLEAN POWER Plan with the Jacksonville Electric Authority (JEA)

SUMMARY:
REGION 4 PROVIDED INFORMATION ON THE CLEAN POWER PLAN to the Jacksonville Electric on October 28,
2014; specifically, regarding JEA's questions about how to handle and account for their current and
anticipated out of state generation.  The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed
on June 2, 2014.
ATTENDEES:

EPA
Ken Mitchell/EPA R4
David McNeal/EPA R4
Keith Goff/EPA R4
Mikhail Adamantiades/EPA OAP
Nicholas Swanson/EPA OAP
Beth Conlin/EPA OAQPS
Lora Strine/EPA OAQPS

External Stakeholders
Bud Para/JEA
Nancy Kilgo/JEA


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 183 (Friday, September 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53134-53137]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20654]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-93059; File No. SR-CBOE-2021-054]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Make
Certain Corrections and Other Clarifying Changes to the Rules

September 20, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 16, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to make certain corrections and other clarifying changes to the Rules.
The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set

forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to make non-substantive changes to its Cboe
Exchange Rulebook (``Rulebook'') in order to correct certain errors and
make certain clarifications throughout the Rules.
    The proposed rule change corrects cross-reference errors in Rules
1.1, 5.5, 5.6, 5.50, 5.51, 5.80 and 5.91 that are currently inaccurate,
as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Rule location of current       Current cross-      Revised/accurate
  inaccurate cross-reference        reference         cross-reference
------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.5 (System Access and          5.9..............  5.10.
 Connectivity) paragraph
 (b)(2).
5.6 (Order Types, Order         5.88.............  5.85.
 Instructions, and Times-in-
 Force) paragraph (c)
 (definition of ``Compression
 or Position Compression Cross
 (``PCC'') Order'').
5.50 (Market-Maker              Paragraph (g)....  Paragraph (h).
 Appointments) paragraph
 (h)(1).
5.50 (Market-Maker              Paragraph (g) and  Incorrect cross-
 Appointments) paragraphs (i),   paragraph (h).     references to
 (i)(1), (i)(2) and (i)(3).                         paragraph (g) should
                                                    be paragraph (h) and
                                                    incorrect cross
                                                    reference to
                                                    paragraph (h) should
                                                    be paragraph (i).
5.51 (Market-Maker              8.26.............  8.19.
 Obligations) paragraph (c).
5.80 (Admission to and Conduct  Chapter 3........  Chapter 13.
 on the Trading Floor)
 paragraph (c)(1)(C).
5.91 (Floor Broker              8.26.............  8.19.
 Responsibilities) paragraph
 (d)(2).
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change also corrects paragraph numbering and
lettering in Rules 5.34 and 6.22. Current Rule 5.34(a)(4) jumps from
subparagraph (C) to (E), Rule 5.34(c) jumps from subparagraph (10) to
(12), and Rule 6.22 jumps from paragraph (c) to (e). The proposed rule
change corrects these paragraph formatting errors by updating Rule
5.34(a)(4)(E) to (D), Rule 5.34(c)(12) to (11), and Rule 6.22(e) to
(d).
    The proposed rule change removes extraneous rule text from Rule
5.81(h). Specifically, the proposed rule change removes an extraneous
``or'' at the end of the first sentence in that paragraph. The proposed
rule change also amends Rule 6.5 to remove the term Voluntary
Professional Customer as the Exchange no longer recognizes the concept
of Voluntary Professional Customers and no longer uses the term in its
Rules.\5\ Additionally, the proposed rule change replaces the term
``TPH Department'' with the term ``Exchange'' in Rules 3.7, 3.8, 3.10,
3.11, 3.13, 3.15, 3.50, 3.59, 3.60, and 3.61. In 2018, the Exchange
renamed its ``TPH Department'' to be called ``Membership Services.''
The proposed rule change removes reference to a ``summary fine under
Rule 13.15'' in Rule 6.1(a)(1), which governs late transaction reports,
as a pattern and practice of late reporting without exceptional
circumstances may no longer be subject to a summary fine under
13.15.\6\ The proposed rule change seeks to use the term the
``Exchange'' as it does throughout the Rulebook when referring to
actions taken by the Exchange or information that market participants
needs to send to the Exchange. The Exchange prefers to use the term
``Exchange'' rather than reference a specific department to permit
internal reorganization or changing of department names without the
need for a rule filing. Pursuant to Rule 1.5, the Exchange will
communicate to TPHs through notices, regulatory circulars, or other
communication where to send information to the Exchange (including to
which department such information should be directed).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86173 (June 20,
2019), 84 FR 30267 (June 26, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-027).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92702 (August 18,
2021), 86 FR 47346 (August 24, 2021) (SR-CBOE-2021-045).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change relocates Rule 8.43(j) to Rule 8.35(d).
The Exchange previously restructured its Rulebook in connection with a
2019 technology migration. Prior to restructuring, the provision
currently in Rule 8.43(j) (former Rule 24A.7(d)), which specifically
governs FLEX reporting requirements, was a part of former Rule 24A.7,
which governed FLEX position limits and general requirements, including
reporting. Former Rule 24A.7 was relocated to current Rule 8.35.\7\
Current Rule 8.43 (former Rule 4.13), instead, governs reports related
to non-FLEX position limits. The provision in Rule 8.43(j) (former
24A.7(d)) was not previously included in the Rule governing reports
related to non-FLEX position limits (current Rule 8.43/former Rule
4.13) nor did the Exchange intend for this provision to become a part
of the Rule governing non-FLEX reports related to position limits
(current Rule 8.43, former Rule 4.13). However, upon restructuring its
Rulebook and relocating its Rules related to position and exercise
limits, the Exchange inadvertently relocated the provision in regarding
FLEX reporting requirements to Rule 8.43.\8\ Therefore, the proposed
rule change corrects this inadvertent relocation by moving the
provision in Rule 8.43(j) back to Rule 8.35 (as Rule 8.35(d)), the
appropriate location for FLEX reporting requirements.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87261 (October 9,
2019), 84 FR 55351 (October 16, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-096).
    \8\ See id.
    \9\ In light of the proposed rule change to relocate Rule
8.43(j) to Rule 8.35(d), the proposed rule change also updates
cross-references within this provision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change also makes a non-substantive clarification
in Rules 5.54, 5.55 and 5.56 in connection with Designated Primary
Market-Makers (``DPMs''), Lead Market-Makers (``LMMs''), and Primary
Market-Makers (``PMMs'') continuous quoting requirements, respectively.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to add clarity to these Rules by
making the definition of continuous electronic quoting explicit in
each. All Market Makers, including DPMs, PMMs, and LMMs, are required
to provide continuous electronic quotes by submitting continuous bids
and offers for 90% of the time during Regular Trading Hours. The
definition

of continuous quoting requirements is explicit in Rule 5.52(d)(2),
which provides for a 90% timing requirement for a Market-Maker's
continuous electronic quotes.\10\ The proposed rule change merely
proposes to make the same requirement explicit, thus providing
additional clarity in the Rules governing electronic quoting
requirements for DPMs, LMMs and PMMs. This is the continuous electronic
quoting requirement to which DPMs, LMM and PMMs are currently subject.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Exchange notes that the 90% timing requirement for a
Market-Maker applies while the Market-Maker is ``required to provide
electronic quotes in an appointed option class on a given trading
day'' as provided in Rule 5.52(d)(2), while the 90% timing
requirement for a DPM, LMM and PMM applies ``during Regular Trading
Hours'', as provided in Rules 5.54(a)(1), 5.55(a)(1), and 5.56(a),
respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the proposed rule change also makes a non-substantive
clarification in Rule 1.1 under the definition of Capacity. The
definition of ``L'' Capacity code provides that it is for the account
of a non-Trading Permit Holder affiliate. The Exchange notes that the
``L'' Capacity code is specifically defined in and for the purposes
described in the Cboe Options Fees Schedule. Therefore, the proposed
rule change adds language to the definition of ``L'' Capacity code to
make this explicit, thereby providing additional clarity in the Rule.
(a) Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\11\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \12\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \13\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, will protect
investors and the public interest by correcting errors and inaccuracies
and clarifying text within the Rules. Specifically, by correcting
inaccurate cross-references, errors in certain Rule text and in Rule
numbering and lettering, updating a defined term, relocating an
inadvertently moved Rule to its original and appropriate location and
adding clarifying language regarding the timing requirement for
continuous quoting requirements, which is the same for all Market-
Makers,\14\ in the Rules governing quoting requirements for DPMs, LMMs,
PMMs, as well as clarifying language in regarding the application of
the L Capacity code (i.e., for purposes of the Fees Schedule), the
proposed rule change is designed to protect investors by making the
Rulebook more accurate and adding clarity to the Rules, thereby
mitigating any potential investor confusion. The proposed rule change
will have no impact on trading on the Exchange, as all the proposed
rule changes are nonsubstantive in nature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not
intended as a competitive filing, but rather simply updates the Rules
to correct certain errors and add clarity. The proposed rule change
makes no substantive changes to the Rules, and thus will have no impact
on trading on the Exchange.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \17\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \18\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay. The
Exchange notes that the proposed rule change will have no impact on
trading on the Exchange, as it does not make any substantive changes to
the Rules. Rather, the proposal corrects minor errors and makes non-
substantive clarifications to mitigate any potential investor
confusion. The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest because the proposed rule change is non-substantive in nature
as it corrects outdated or incorrect cross references and paragraph
numbering, relocates some text, and makes non-substantive
clarifications to add clarity to avoid any potential for confusion.
Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and
designates the proposal as operative upon filing.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \19\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and

arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2021-054 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-054. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
    Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or
edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-054
and should be submitted on or before October 15, 2021.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-20654 Filed 9-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 64048]
[FR Doc No: 2013-25183]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Intelligent Transportation Systems Program Advisory Committee;
Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: ITS Joint Program Office, Research and Innovative Technology
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Program Advisory
Committee (ITSPAC) will hold a meeting by web conference on November
18, 2013, from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (EDT).
    The ITSPAC, established under Section 5305 of Public Law 109-59,
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A
Legacy for Users, August 10, 2005, and re-established under Section
53003 of Public Law 112-141, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st
Century, July 6, 2012, was created to advise the Secretary of
Transportation on all matters relating to the study, development, and
implementation of intelligent transportation systems. Through its
sponsor, the ITS Joint Program Office (JPO), the ITSPAC makes
recommendations to the Secretary regarding ITS Program needs,
objectives, plans, approaches, content, and progress.
    The following is a summary of the meeting tentative agenda: (1)
Welcome and Introductions, (2) Safety Pilot Update, (3) Review of
Deployment Incentives Report, (4) Review of Draft Final
Recommendations, and (5) Next Steps and Remaining Tasks.
    The web conference will be open to the public, but limited
conference lines will be available on a first-come, first-served basis.
Members of the public who wish to participate in the web conference
must request approval from Mr. Stephen Glasscock, the Committee
Designated Federal Official, at<PHONE_NUMBER>, not later than November
11, 2013. You must request Mr. Glasscock's approval also to present
oral statements during the web conference.
    Questions about the agenda or written comments may be submitted by
U.S. Mail to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Research and
Innovative Technology Administration, ITS Joint Program Office,
Attention: Stephen Glasscock, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., HOIT,
Washington, DC 20590 or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>. The ITS Joint Program
Office requests that written comments be submitted not later than
November 11, 2013.
    Notice of this meeting is provided in accordance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act and the General Services Administration
regulations (41 CFR part 102-3) covering management of Federal advisory
committees.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on the 22nd day of October 2013.
John Augustine,
Managing Director, ITS Joint Program Office.
[FR Doc. 2013-25183 Filed 10-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-HY-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 91 (Friday, May 10, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 27315-27318]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11168]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0369; Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-128-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted
by reports of fractured rudder pedal pushrod connecting bolts in a
rudder pedal assembly. This proposed AD would require repetitive
replacements of the rudder pedal pushrod connecting bolts and
repetitive inspections of the rudder pedal assembly bolt holes in each
of the captain and the first officer rudder pedal assemblies, and if
necessary, repair or replacement of worn rudder pedal assemblies. We
are proposing this AD to prevent fracture of the rudder pedal pushrod
connecting bolts during pedal use, which could result in a large
involuntary input to the rudder, nose-wheel steering, and braking
systems, leading to a runway excursion.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 24, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.

     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marie Hogestad, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, FAA, ANM-130S, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-
3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2013-0369;
Directorate Identifier 2012-NM-128-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We received reports of fractured rudder pedal pushrod connecting
bolts on Boeing Model 757 airplanes. One operator discovered a bolt was
fractured during an inspection, following a report that the captain's
right pedal was loose. Another operator reported a fractured bolt
during the airplane pushback. When the captain applied the brakes, the
right hand rudder pedal collapsed and both pedals fell forward. An
inspection revealed that a rudder pedal pushrod bolt was fractured,
resulting in a full left rudder input. Also, in a separate incident,
during routine maintenance, while the brakes were released, a loud
crack was heard and the right hand rudder pedal went all the way
forward. During investigation, it was determined that the captain's
right hand rudder pedal pushrod bolt had fractured. The rudder pedal
pushrod connecting bolt secures the rudder pedal arm to the rudder
pushrod. The bolt is cantilevered in a single shear arrangement that is
not capable of carrying its design load if there is looseness in the
installation (bolt bending is introduced). The bolts can also rotate,
due to lack of bolt clamp-up, causing additional wear. This condition,
if not corrected, could result in a fracture of the rudder pedal
pushrod connecting bolts during pedal use, which could result in large
involuntary input to the rudder, nose-wheel steering, and braking
systems, leading to a runway excursion.

Related Rulemaking

    We issued AD 2001-22-13, Amendment 39-12492 (66 FR 55075, November
1, 2001), for certain Model 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777 series
airplanes. That AD requires replacing the rudder pedal pushrod
fasteners (bolts) for the captain's and first officer's pedal
assemblies with titanium fasteners (bolts).
    We have determined that titanium bolts are under-strength on Model
757 airplanes and must be replaced with Inconel bolts. Titanum bolts
do, however, meet the static and fatigue requirements for the other
airplane models affected by AD 2001-22-13, Amendment 39-12492 (66 FR
55075, November 1, 2001).

Relevant Service Information

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May 9,
2012, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, Revision
1, dated October 29, 2012. For information on the procedures and
compliance times, see this service information at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for Docket No. FAA-2013-0369.

FAA's Determination

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously. Replacements of the
rudder pedal pushrod connecting bolts are done after each inspection
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD, regardless of the inspection
results. Some actions would terminate the requirements of AD 2001-22-
13, Amendment 39-12492 (66 FR 55075, November 1, 2001), for Model 757
airplanes.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 685 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                    Labor cost         Parts cost      Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspect/replace bolts (Condition  5 work-hours x $85             $217   $642 per inspection  $439,770 per
 1 in the Accomplishment           per hour = $425                       cycle.               inspection cycle.
 Instructions of Boeing Alert      per inspection
 Service Bulletin 757-27A0153,     cycle.
 dated May 9, 2012, as revised
 by Boeing Alert Service
 Bulletin 757-27A0153, Revision
 1, dated October 29, 2012).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs/
replacements that would be required based on the results of the
proposed inspection. We have no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these repairs/replacements:

                                               On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per
                     Action                            Labor cost               Parts cost            product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replace rudder pedal assembly (Condition 2 in    2 work-hours x $85 per  Unknown................            $170
 the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing        hour = $170.
 Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May
 9, 2012, as revised by Boeing Alert Service
 Bulletin 757-27A0153, Revision 1, dated
 October 29, 2012).
Repair rudder pedal assembly (Condition 3 in     3 work-hours x $85 per  Unknown................             255
 the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing        hour = $255.
 Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May
 9, 2012, as revised by Boeing Alert Service
 Bulletin 757-27A0153, Revision 1, dated
 October 29, 2012).
Repair rudder pedal assembly (Condition 4 in     4 work-hours x $85 per  Unknown................             340
 the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing        hour = $340.
 Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May
 9, 2012, as revised by Boeing Alert Service
 Bulletin 757-27A0153, Revision 1, dated
 October 29, 2012).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The on-condition costs in the table above are per rudder pedal
assembly. Depending on the diamater of the holes found during the
inspection, it may be necessary to replace or repair the rudder pedal
assemblies. The parts cost to replace or repair the rudder pedal
assemblies are not included in the estimate. It is considered ``Parts &
Materials Supplied by the Operator'', which is referenced in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May 9, 2012, as revised by
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, Revision 1, dated October
29, 2012.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2013-0369; Directorate Identifier
2012-NM-128-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by June 24, 2013.

(b) Affected ADs

    Certain requirements of this AD terminate the requirements of AD
2001-22-13, Amendment 39-12492 (66 FR 55075, November 1, 2001), for
Model 757 airplanes.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF,
-200CB, and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)/Air Transport Association
(ATA) of America Code 27, Flight Controls.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of fractured rudder pedal
pushrod connecting bolts in the rudder pedal assembly. We are
issuing this AD to prevent fracture of the rudder pedal pushrod
connecting bolts during pedal use, which could result in a large
involuntary input to the rudder, nose-wheel steering, and braking
systems, leading to a runway excursion.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Inspection

    Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD, do a
detailed inspection of the rudder pedal assembly bolt holes to
determine the diameter, in each of the captain and the first officer
rudder pedal assemblies, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May
9, 2012, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153,
Revision 1, dated October 29, 2012. Repeat this inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 15,000 flight cycles.

(h) Installation

    Do the applicable actions specified in paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2),
or (h)(3) of this AD for each of the captain and first officer
rudder pedal assemblies, based on the results of any inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD. Accomplishment of paragraph
(h)(1), (h)(2), or (h)(3) of this AD terminates the requirements of
AD 2001-22-13, Amendment 39-12492 (66 FR 55075, November 1, 2001),
for that Model 757 airplane only.
    (1) If the diameters of both holes are within 0.3120 and 0.3140
inch on the assembly, before further flight, install new rudder
pedal pushrod connect bolt, washer, nut, and cotter pin, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May 9, 2012, as revised by
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, Revision 1, dated October
29, 2012.
    (2) If the diameter of only one hole is greater than 0.3140 inch
on the assembly, before further flight, do the actions specified in
paragraphs (h)(2)(i) and (h)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Install a new rudder pedal assembly, or install a bushing in
the worn hole, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May 9, 2012, as
revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, Revision 1,
dated October 29, 2012.
    (ii) Install new rudder pedal pushrod connecting bolt, washer,
nut, and cotter pin, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May
9, 2012, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153,
Revision 1, dated October 29, 2012.
    (3) If the diameters of both holes are greater than 0.3140 inch
on the assembly, before further flight, do the actions specified in
paragraphs (h)(3)(i) and (h)(3)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Install a new rudder pedal assembly, or install two bushings
in the two worn holes, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May
9, 2012, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153,
Revision 1, dated October 29, 2012.
    (ii) Install new rudder pedal pushrod connecting bolt, washer,
nut, and cotter pin, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May
9, 2012, as revised by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153,
Revision 1, dated October 29, 2012.

(i) Parts Installation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install, in a
rudder pedal assembly of any Boeing 757 airplane, a bolt having part
number (P/N) BACB30NM5DK47.

(j) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if operators installed washers
having part number NAS1149D0516J, NAS1149D0532J, and NAS1149D0563J,
and if those actions were performed before the effective date of
this AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, dated May
9, 2012, which is not incorporated by reference in this AD, as
unmodified by Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-27A0153, Revision 1,
dated October 29, 2012.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in the Related Information
section of this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
(ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make
those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(l) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Marie Hogestad,
Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, FAA, ANM-130S,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P. O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may review copies of the referenced
service information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 2, 2013.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.

[FR Doc. 2013-11168 Filed 5-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 88 (Monday, May 7, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26816-26818]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10929]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-1999-6156; FMCSA-1999-6480; FMCSA-2001-11426; FMCSA-
2005-22727; FMCSA-2005-23099; FMCSA-2005-23238; FMCSA-2006-24015;
FMCSA-2007-0071; FMCSA-2008-0021]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of renewal of exemptions; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to renew the exemptions from the
vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for
16 individuals. FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals
from the vision requirement if the exemptions granted will not
compromise safety. The Agency has concluded that granting these
exemption renewals will provide a level of safety that is equivalent to
or greater than the level of safety maintained without the exemptions
for these commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers.

DATES: This decision is effective May 25, 2012. Comments must be
received on or before June 6, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) numbers: FMCSA-1999-6156; FMCSA-1999-6480;
FMCSA-2001-11426; FMCSA-2005-22727; FMCSA-2005-23099; FMCSA-2005-23238;
FMCSA-2006-24015; FMCSA-2007-0071; FMCSA-2008-0021, using any of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
docket number for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments
received without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any

personal information included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act
heading below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) is
available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. If you want
acknowledgment that we received your comments, please include a self-
addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting comments on-line.
    Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's Privacy Act Statement for the FDMS published in
the Federal Register on January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316), or you may visit
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine M. Papp, Chief, Medical
Programs Division,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>FMCSA,
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W64-224,
Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may renew an exemption
from the vision requirements in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10), which applies to
drivers of CMVs in interstate commerce, for a two-year period if it
finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that is
equivalent to or greater than the level that would be achieved absent
such exemption.'' The procedures for requesting an exemption (including
renewals) are set out in 49 CFR part 381.

Exemption Decision

    This notice addresses 16 individuals who have requested renewal of
their exemptions in accordance with FMCSA procedures. FMCSA has
evaluated these 16 applications for renewal on their merits and decided
to extend each exemption for a renewable two-year period. They are:

Paul D. Crouch (OR), John M. Doney (MO), Curtis N. Fulbright (NC),
Joshua G. Hansen (ID), Daniel W. Henderson (TN), Edward W. Hosier (MO),
Craig T. Jorgensen (WI), Jose A. Lopez (CT), Earl E. Martin (VA), Brian
E. Monaghan (IL), William P. Murphy (TX), Roy J. Oltman (IL), Albert L.
Remsburg, III (MD), Antonio A. Ribeiro (CT), Justin T. Richman (IN),
Frankie A. Wilborn (GA)

    The exemptions are extended subject to the following conditions:
(1) That each individual has a physical examination every year (a) by
an ophthalmologist or optometrist who attests that the vision in the
better eye continues to meet the requirements in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10),
and (b) by a medical examiner who attests that the individual is
otherwise physically qualified under 49 CFR 391.41; (2) that each
individual provides a copy of the ophthalmologist's or optometrist's
report to the medical examiner at the time of the annual medical
examination; and (3) that each individual provide a copy of the annual
medical certification to the employer for retention in the driver's
qualification file and retains a copy of the certification on his/her
person while driving for presentation to a duly authorized Federal,
State, or local enforcement official. Each exemption will be valid for
two years unless rescinded earlier by FMCSA. The exemption will be
rescinded if: (1) The person fails to comply with the terms and
conditions of the exemption; (2) the exemption has resulted in a lower
level of safety than was maintained before it was granted; or (3)
continuation of the exemption would not be consistent with the goals
and objectives of 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315.

Basis for Renewing Exemptions

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(1), an exemption may be granted for no
longer than two years from its approval date and may be renewed upon
application for additional two year periods. In accordance with 49
U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, each of the 16 applicants has satisfied the
entry conditions for obtaining an exemption from the vision
requirements (64 FR 54948; 64 FR 68195; 65 FR 159; 65 FR 20251; 66 FR
66969; 67 FR 10471; 67 FR 17102; 67 FR 19798; 68 FR 69432; 69 FR 17267;
69 FR 19611; 70 FR 71884; 71 FR 644; 71 FR 16410; 71 FR 19604; 71 FR
4632; 71 FR 4194; 71 FR 13450; 71 FR 5105; 71 FR 19600; 71 FR 14566; 71
FR 30227; 73 FR 6242; 73 FR 16950; 73 FR 27014; 73 FR 15567; 73 FR
27015; 75 FR 27622). Each of these 16 applicants has requested renewal
of the exemption and has submitted evidence showing that the vision in
the better eye continues to meet the requirement specified at 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10) and that the vision impairment is stable. In addition, a
review of each record of safety while driving with the respective
vision deficiencies over the past two years indicates each applicant
continues to meet the vision exemption requirements. These factors
provide an adequate basis for predicting each driver's ability to
continue to drive safely in interstate commerce. Therefore, FMCSA
concludes that extending the exemption for each renewal applicant for a
period of two years is likely to achieve a level of safety equal to
that existing without the exemption.

Request for Comments

    FMCSA will review comments received at any time concerning a
particular driver's safety record and determine if the continuation of
the exemption is consistent with the requirements at 49 U.S.C. 31136(e)
and 31315. However, FMCSA requests that interested parties with
specific data concerning the safety records of these drivers submit
comments by June 6, 2012.
    FMCSA believes that the requirements for a renewal of an exemption
under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 can be satisfied by initially
granting the renewal and then requesting and evaluating, if needed,
subsequent comments submitted by interested parties. As indicated
above, the Agency previously published notices of final disposition
announcing its decision to exempt these 16 individuals from the vision
requirement in 49 CFR 391.41(b)(10). The final decision to grant an
exemption to each of these individuals was made on the merits of each
case and made only after careful consideration of the comments received
to its notices of applications. The notices of applications stated in
detail the qualifications, experience, and medical condition of each
applicant for an exemption from the vision requirements. That
information is available by consulting the above cited Federal Register
publications.
    Interested parties or organizations possessing information that
would otherwise show that any, or all, of these drivers are not
currently achieving the statutory level of safety should immediately
notify FMCSA. The Agency will evaluate any adverse evidence submitted
and, if safety is being compromised or if continuation of

the exemption would not be consistent with the goals and objectives of
49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA will take immediate steps to revoke
the exemption of a driver.

    Issued on: April 18, 2012.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-10929 Filed 5-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register: August 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 147)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 45049-45052]
[DOCID:fr02au10-2]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30737; Amdt. No. 3385]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient

use of the navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations
under instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective August 2, 2010. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 2, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169; or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_
federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability_All SIAPs are available online free of charge. Visit
nfdc.faa.gov to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP copies may be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420) Flight Technologies and Programs Division,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082 Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97) by amending the referenced SIAPs.
The complete regulatory description of each SIAP is listed on the
appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National Flight Data
Center (FDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is incorporated
by reference in the amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and
Sec.  97.20 of Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
    The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the need for a
special format make their verbatim publication in the Federal Register
expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use the regulatory
text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction on charts
printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP contained in FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the types of SIAP and the corresponding effective dates. This
amendment also identifies the airport and its location, the procedure
and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP as amended in the transmittal. For safety and
timeliness of change considerations, this amendment incorporates only
specific changes contained for each SIAP as modified by FDC/P-NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs, as modified by FDC P-NOTAM, and contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these changes to
SIAPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in an FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts. The circumstances which created the need for all
these SIAP amendments require making them effective in less than 30
days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs
and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and public procedure
before adopting these SIAPs are impracticable and contrary to the
public interest and, where applicable, that good cause exists for
making these SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule''under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on July 23, 2010.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, title 14, Code
of Federal regulations, part 97, 14 CFR part 97, is amended by amending
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, effective at 0901 UTC on the
dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Sec. Sec.  97.23, 97.25, 97.27, 97.29, 97.31, 97.33, and
97.35  [Amended]

    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

 * * * Effective Upon Publication

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       AIRAC date             State                City                 Airport           FDC No.      FDC date                   Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26-Aug-10..............  VT               RUTLAND..............  RUTLAND-SOUTHERN            0/0059       7/1/10  LOC Z RWY 19, AMDT 1B
                                                                  VERMONT RGNL.
26-Aug-10..............  KS               HAYS.................  HAYS RGNL............       0/0110       7/1/10  VOR/DME RWY 16, AMDT 3E
26-Aug-10..............  NJ               TETERBORO............  TETERBORO............       0/0117       7/7/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 6, AMDT 29D
26-Aug-10..............  KY               LONDON...............  LONDON-CORBIN ARPT-         0/1641      6/28/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 6, AMDT 1
                                                                  MAGEE FLD.
26-Aug-10..............  KY               LONDON...............  LONDON-CORBIN ARPT-         0/1642      6/28/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, ORIG
                                                                  MAGEE FLD.
26-Aug-10..............  OH               DELAWARE.............  DELAWARE MUNI........       0/2960      6/22/10  NDB RWY 10, ORIG
26-Aug-10..............  MN               GRAND RAPIDS.........  GRAND RAPIDS/ITASCA         0/3218      6/22/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, ORIG
                                                                  CO-GORDON NEWSTROM
                                                                  FLD.
26-Aug-10..............  PA               ERIE.................  ERIE INTL/TOM RIDGE         0/5381      6/28/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 6, AMDT 16
                                                                  FIELD.
26-Aug-10..............  MA               CHATHAM..............  CHATHAM MUNI.........       0/5399       7/1/10  RNAV (GPS) B, ORIG
26-Aug-10..............  MA               CHATHAM..............  CHATHAM MUNI.........       0/5400       7/1/10  NDB A, AMDT 1
26-Aug-10..............  CA               MONTEREY.............  MONTEREY PENINSULA...       0/5488      6/28/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 10R, AMDT 27
26-Aug-10..............  CQ               SAIPAN...............  FRANCISCO C. ADA/           0/5800      6/22/10  GPS RWY 25, AMDT 1B
                                                                  SAIPAN INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  CA               SAN DIEGO/EL CAJON...  GILLESPIE FIELD......       0/6301      6/28/10  TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND OBSTACLE DP, AMDT
                                                                                4
26-Aug-10..............  MI               MANISTEE.............  MANISTEE CO-BLACKER..       0/6451      6/22/10  ILS RWY 27, ORIG-A
26-Aug-10..............  OH               NEW PHILADELPHIA.....  HARRY CLEVER FIELD...       0/6705      6/22/10  VOR A, AMDT 1
26-Aug-10..............  OH               TOLEDO...............  TOLEDO EXPRESS.......       0/6710      6/22/10  RADAR-1, AMDT 19
26-Aug-10..............  OH               COLUMBUS.............  PORT COLUMBUS INTL...       0/6711      6/28/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 28R, AMDT 3
26-Aug-10..............  OH               TOLEDO...............  TOLEDO EXPRESS.......       0/6712      6/22/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, ORIG
26-Aug-10..............  OH               WAUSEON..............  FULTON COUNTY........       0/6713      6/28/10  NDB OR GPS RWY 27, AMDT 7
26-Aug-10..............  OH               OXFORD...............  MIAMI UNIVERSITY.....       0/6715      6/22/10  NDB OR GPS RWY 5, AMDT 10A
26-Aug-10..............  OH               COSHOCTON............  RICHARD DOWNING......       0/6716      6/28/10  GPS RWY 22, ORIG
26-Aug-10..............  OH               ST CLAIRSVILLE.......  ALDERMAN.............       0/6717      6/28/10  VOR OR GPS A, AMDT 3
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CAMBRIDGE............  CAMBRIDGE MUNI.......       0/6718      6/22/10  VOR OR GPS A, AMDT 3A
26-Aug-10..............  OH               BARNESVILLE..........  BARNESVILLE-BRADFIELD       0/6719      6/22/10  VOR/DME RWY 27, ORIG-A
26-Aug-10..............  OH               ELYRIA...............  ELYRIA...............       0/6720      6/28/10  VOR OR GPS A, AMDT 7A
26-Aug-10..............  CA               BURBANK..............  BOB HOPE.............       0/6747      6/28/10  TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND OBSTACLE DP, AMDT
                                                                                4
26-Aug-10..............  OH               BUCYRUS..............  PORT BUCYRUS-CRAWFORD       0/7188      6/28/10  VOR OR GPS RWY 22, AMDT 4
                                                                  COUNTY.
26-Aug-10..............  MA               NORTHAMPTON..........  NORTHAMPTON..........       0/7264      6/22/10  VOR/DME B, AMDT 5
26-Aug-10..............  OK               HINTON...............  HINTON MUNI..........       0/7447      6/22/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, AMDT 1
26-Aug-10..............  OH               YOUNGSTOWN/WARREN....  YOUNGSTOWN/WARREN           0/7496      6/28/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 32, AMDT 26
                                                                  RGNL.
26-Aug-10..............  CT               DANBURY..............  DANBURY MUNI.........       0/7527       7/6/10  LOC RWY 8, AMDT 5
26-Aug-10..............  CT               DANBURY..............  DANBURY MUNI.........       0/7530       7/6/10  VOR OR GPS A, AMDT 9A
26-Aug-10..............  CT               DANBURY..............  DANBURY MUNI.........       0/7532       7/6/10  GPS RWY 8, AMDT 1
26-Aug-10..............  ND               BISMARCK.............  BISMARCK MUNI........       0/8040      6/28/10  ILS RWY 13, AMDT 2D
26-Aug-10..............  ND               BISMARCK.............  BISMARCK MUNI........       0/8042      6/28/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 31, AMDT 32E
26-Aug-10..............  ND               BISMARCK.............  BISMARCK MUNI........       0/8043      6/28/10  RADAR-1, AMDT 3A
26-Aug-10..............  MI               ALPENA...............  ALPENA COUNTY RGNL...       0/8129       7/1/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 1, AMDT 8C
26-Aug-10..............  VT               BURLINGTON...........  BURLINGTON INTL......       0/8331      6/28/10  VOR RWY 1, AMDT 11D
26-Aug-10..............  VT               BURLINGTON...........  BURLINGTON INTL......       0/8332      6/28/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, ORIG
26-Aug-10..............  VT               BURLINGTON...........  BURLINGTON INTL......       0/8333      6/28/10  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 15, ORIG
26-Aug-10..............  VT               BURLINGTON...........  BURLINGTON INTL......       0/8335      6/28/10  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 15, ORIG-A
26-Aug-10..............  VT               BURLINGTON...........  BURLINGTON INTL......       0/8337      6/28/10  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 15, AMDT 23B
26-Aug-10..............  MS               BAY ST LOUIS.........  STENNIS INTL.........       0/8346      6/28/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 18, ORIG-A

26-Aug-10..............  MS               BAY ST LOUIS.........  STENNIS INTL.........       0/8347      6/28/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, ORIG
26-Aug-10..............  MS               BAY ST LOUIS.........  STENNIS INTL.........       0/8348      6/28/10  VOR A, AMDT 7
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8648       7/6/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 6L, AMDT 1
                                                                  INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8649       7/6/10  ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 24R, AMDT 4
                                                                  INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8650       7/6/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 28, AMDT 23A
                                                                  INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8652       7/6/10  CONVERGING ILS RWY 24R, ORIG
                                                                  INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8653       7/6/10  CONVERGING ILS RWY 28, ORIG-A
                                                                  INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8659       7/6/10  ILS PRM RWY 6L (SIM CLOSE PARALLEL),
                                                                  INTL.                                            ORIG-B
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8660       7/6/10  ILS PRM RWY 24R (SIM CLOSE PARALLEL),
                                                                  INTL.                                            ORIG-A
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8661       7/6/10  LDA/DME RWY 6R, AMDT 1
                                                                  INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8662       7/6/10  LDA/DME RWY 24L, AMDT 1
                                                                  INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8663       7/6/10  LDA PRM RWY 6R (SIM CLOSE PARALLEL),
                                                                  INTL.                                            AMDT 1A
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8664       7/6/10  LDA PRM RWY 24L (SIM CLOSE PARALLEL),
                                                                  INTL.                                            ORIG-A
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8665       7/6/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 6R, AMDT 2
                                                                  INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8666       7/6/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 6R, AMDT 20A
                                                                  INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  OH               CLEVELAND............  CLEVELAND-HOPKINS           0/8667       7/6/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 6L, AMDT 2A
                                                                  INTL.
26-Aug-10..............  ND               GRAND FORKS..........  GRAND FORKS INTL.....       0/8718       7/1/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 17R, ORIG-A
26-Aug-10..............  OH               LEBANON..............  LEBANON-WARREN COUNTY       0/8781       7/1/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, ORIG-B
26-Aug-10..............  NY               HORNELL..............  HORNELL MUNI.........       0/8923       7/1/10  VOR/DME A, AMDT 4
26-Aug-10..............  NY               HORNELL..............  HORNELL MUNI.........       0/8924       7/1/10  GPS RWY 36, ORIG-A
26-Aug-10..............  NY               HORNELL..............  HORNELL MUNI.........       0/8926       7/1/10  GPS RWY 18, ORIG-A
26-Aug-10..............  MI               GRAND RAPIDS.........  GERALD R. FORD INTL..       0/9017       7/1/10  RADAR-1, AMDT 10B
26-Aug-10..............  CA               SAN JOSE.............  NORMAN Y. MINETA SAN        0/9024       7/1/10  TAKEOFF MINIMUMS AND OBSTACLE DP, AMDT
                                                                  JOSE INTL.                                       6A
26-Aug-10..............  WV               LEWISBURG............  GREENBRIER VALLEY....       0/9026       7/6/10  VOR RWY 4, AMDT 1
26-Aug-10..............  WV               LEWISBURG............  GREENBRIER VALLEY....       0/9027       7/6/10  ILS OR LOC RWY 4, AMDT 10
26-Aug-10..............  ND               DEVILS LAKE..........  DEVILS LAKE RGNL.....       0/9343       7/1/10  VOR RWY 13, ORIG-A
26-Aug-10..............  CO               LAMAR................  LAMAR MUNI...........       0/9666       7/6/10  RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, AMDT 1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2010-18744 Filed 7-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P