[Federal Register: August 11, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 155)]
[Notices]
[Page 46612]
[DOCID:fr11au08-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13150-000]

FFP Ohio River 2, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Applications
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comment, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

August 5, 2008.
    On March 25, 2008, FFP Ohio River 2, LLC each filed an application,
pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study
the feasibility of the Ohio River 10 and Ohio River 2 Projects, to be
located on the Ohio River in Massac County, Illinois and McCracken
County, Kentucky.
    The proposed Ohio River 2 Project consists of: (1) 2,460 proposed
20 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total installed
capacity of 49.2 megawatts, (2) a proposed transmission line, and (3)
appurtenant facilities. The FFP Ohio River 2, LLC, project would have
an average annual generation of 215.50 gigawatt-hours and be sold to a
local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Dan Irvin, FFP Ohio River 2, LLC, 69 Bridge
Street, Manchester, MA 01944, phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Robert Bell,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13150) in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-18465 Filed 8-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Table 2: Estimated Annual Burden of Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements under NESHAP GGG  Pharmaceutical Operations Activitya ( A)

hours per Occurrence ( B) Occurrences/

respondent/ yr ( C) hours/ respondent/ yr ( D) respondents/

year ( E) Technical personhours yr ( E = CxD) ( F) Management personhours yr ( F= E* 0.05) G Clerical Personhours per year ( G= E* 0.1)

$ H Total Cost b $

1. Applications NA 2. Survey and Studies NA 3. Reporting Requirements A. Read Instructions c 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 B. Required Activities Initial Performance Test  Process Vents ( new) d 1,983 1 1,983 0 0 0 0 0 Process Vents ( Reconstructed) e 661 1 661 1 661 33 66 41,034 Wastewater  new f 271 1 271 0 0 0 0 0 Repeat Performance Test g 60 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 C. Write Report Notification of Construction/ Reconstruction h 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 124 Notification of Physical/ Operational Change h 8 3 24 103 2,472 124 247 153,458 Notification of Anticipated Startup h 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 124 Notification of Actual Startup h 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 62 Notification of Initial Performance Test 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 124 Notification of Applicability of Standards

Existing Sources 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Notification of Applicability of Standards

New Sources i 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 124 Notification of demonstration of CMS j 2 1 2 1 2 0 0 124 Notification of Compliance Status ( NOCSR) 120 1 120 1 120 6 12 7,449 Implementation Plan ( for Emissions Averaging) k 160 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Startup, shutdown and Malfunction Report 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 2,483 Quality Control Plan for CMS 60 1 60 1 60 3 6 3,725 Develop Record System c 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 2,483 Train Personnel c 40 1 40 1 40 2 4 2,483 Semiannual Report 3 2 6 103 618 31 62 38,365 Quarterly Report of excess emissions and CMS performance 20 4 80 10 800 40 80 49,663 LDAR Reports 432 1 432 103 44,496 2,225 4,450 2,762,245 4. Recordkeeping Requirements Records of Operating Parameters for Control Devicesm 830.0 1 830 103 85,490 4,275 8,549 5,307,091 Records of Operating Conditions Exceeding Last Perf. Test 8 1 8 10 80 4 8 4,966 Records of Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction,

etc. 2 26 52 103 5,356 268 536 332,492 TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN 140,284 7,014 14,028 8,708,620 a See attachments 2& 3 for further explanation of respondent activities and assumptions used in cost estimates b Cost assumes a reate of $ 54.94/ hour for technical labor, $ 73.93/ hour for managerial labor and $ 34.42/ hr for clerical labor ( Source: United States Department of Commerce Bureau of Labor Statistics, March 1999, Table 10: Employment Costs for Private Industry by Occupational and Industry Group. The rates are from column 1: Total compensation).

c One time only costs  these costs were accounted for in the initial ICR for the 1st year d Assume a performance test for process vents costs $ 24,420 per process. Assumes no new process vents for this ICR renewal. Person hour burden e estimates have been back calculated from the total cost.

e Assume a performance test for process vents costs $ 24,420 per process. Assumes 1 reconstructed process per facility, no new facilities. Person hour burden estimates have been back calculated from the total cost.

f Assumes a performance test for wastewater streams costs $ 10,000. Assumes 1 wastewater stream per facility is controlled based on information gathered in rulemaking. Person hour burden estimates have been back calculated from total costs; however no new facilities so no costs for this ICR renewal.

g Assumes all existing sources will require an average of 3 process changes per facility and no new facilities ( 103* 3= 309)

h New source requirement; assumes 1 reconstructed facilities i New source requirement; assumes 1 reconstructed facilities k. New source requirement; assumes 1 reconstructed facilities l. New source requirement; assumes 1 reconstructed facilities m Assume 4.55 processes per facility so hours are multiplied by 4.55


[Federal Register: March 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 48)]
[Notices]
[Page 10981-10983]
[DOCID:fr13mr09-115]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59517; File No. SR-NYSEALTR-2009-23]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NYSE Alternext U.S. LLC To
Permit Two Trading Officials To Modify the Required Bid/Ask
Differentials

March 5, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on March 3, 2009, NYSE Alternext U.S. LLC (``NYSE Amex'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective
upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 925NY--Obligations of
Market Makers. The text of the proposed rule change is attached as
Exhibit 5. A copy of this filing is available on the Exchange's Web
site at http://www.nyse.com, at the Exchange's principal office and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received

on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be
examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has
prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to adopt a provision
which will allow the Exchange to establish different quote
differentials other than what is provided for in Rule 925NY(b)(5). The
proposed rule language is substantially similar to what has been
approved for, and is presently in place at, the Chicago Board Options
Exchange (``CBOE'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See CBOE Rule 8.7(b)(iv)(C)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Rule 925NY(b), Market Makers on NYSE Amex are required
to submit electronic quotations within certain bid/ask differentials.
Subsection (5) of this rule states that following an Auction, options
traded on NYSE Amex may be quoted with a difference not to exceed $5
between the bid and offer. NYSE Amex now proposes to add a provision
that will allow the Exchange to establish different bid/ask
differentials for certain series.
    Situations may arise where the $5 differential provided for in Rule
925NY(b)(5) is overly restrictive; this has shown to be the case when
extreme price fluctuations coupled with increased volatility in an
underlying security makes it extremely difficult to accurately
calculate the price of a given options series. To address these
concerns, the CBOE has established modified bid/ask differentials in
certain options series, pursuant to CBOE Rule 8.7(b)(iv).\6\ This
proposed rule change seeks only to allow the Exchange to offer NYSE
Amex Market Makers the same quote relief that is offered to Market
Makers on the CBOE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See CBOE Bid/Ask Circular 09-02 (January 7, 2009)
establishing modified bid/ask differentials pursuant to CBOE Rule
8.7(b)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange envisions establishing quote differentials wider than
$5 in very limited situations. In addition, if the Exchange were to
establish modified bid/ask differentials it would do so with the
contingency that the disseminated markets in affected series would
remain competitive and remain narrower than the relief granted,
whenever possible.
    The CBOE rule states that ``the Exchange'' may establish bid/ask
differences other than what is provided for in their rules. NYSE Amex
proposes that the decision to establish different quote differentials
will be made by two Trading Officials.\7\ In the case of NYSE Amex, two
Trading Officials will collectively make the determination on behalf of
the Exchange. This is the only difference between the CBOE rule text
and the proposed rule text for NYSE Amex.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ A Trading Official is an Exchange Employee that has been
designated as such by the Chief Executive Officer, or the Chief
Regulatory Officer, pursuant to Rule 900.2NY(82).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes than Rule 925NY(b) was adopted when the
Commission approved SR-NYSEALTR-2008-14, on February 27, 2009.\8\ This
rule change was filed in conjunction with the NYSE Amex move to a new
trading facility and the implementation of a new electronic trading
system. Prior to the rule change, NYSE Amex Rule 958-ANTE governed the
bid-ask differentials for eleconic quoting on NYSE Amex. Rule 958-
ANTE(c)(i) contained a similar provision to what is proposed in this
filing, which authorized the Exchange to establish differences other
than what was prescribed in the rule. So, while this proposal does
amend the rules presently in effect for NYSE Amex, the concept of
allowing the Exchange to establish quote differentials, other than what
is prescribed in the rules, in not without precedent.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 34-59472,
February 27, 2009. This Approval Order had not yet been published in
the Federal Register at the time this proposal was filed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \9\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \10\ in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is appropriate in
that it creates a mechanism whereas Market Makers will be able to
provide two side quotations even in situations where it is difficult to
accurately calculate the price of given options series.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f (b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f (b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
    (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
    (ii) Impose any significant burden on competition; and
    (iii) Become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, it
has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the self-regulatory organization to submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of
the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission is waiving the five-day pre-filing
requirement in this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay. The Commission hereby grants the Exchange's request.\13\ The
proposed rule change is substantially similar to a rule of the CBOE and
does not raise any novel or significant issues. Therefore, the
Commission believes that waiving the 30-day period to allow the
proposed rule change to become operative upon filing is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest and designates the
proposal as operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public

interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEALTR-2009-23 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEALTR-2009-23. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSEALTR-2009-23 and should be submitted on or before
April 3, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-5386 Filed 3-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 193 (Wednesday, October 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61710-61711]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25686]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0423]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Requirements for
Submission of Bioequivalence Data

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
November 4, 2011.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or e-mailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0630.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Juanmanuel Vilela, Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
PI50-400B, Rockville, MD 20850,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Requirements for Submission of Bioequivalence Data--21 CFR Parts 314
and 320--(OMB Control Number 0910-0630)--Extension

    In the Federal Register of January 16, 2009 (74 FR 2849), the
Agency published a final rule revising FDA regulations to require
applicants to submit data on all bioequivalence (BE) studies, including
studies that do not meet passing BE criteria, which are performed on a
drug product formulation submitted for approval under an abbreviated
new drug application (ANDA), or in an amendment to an ANDA that
contains BE studies. In the final rule, FDA amended Sec. Sec.
314.94(a)(7)(i), 314.96(a)(1), 314.97, and 320.21(b)(1), to require an
ANDA applicant to submit information from all BE studies, both passing
and nonpassing, conducted by the applicant on the same drug product
formulation as that submitted for approval under an ANDA, amendment, or
supplement.
    In table 1 of this document, FDA has estimated the reporting burden
associated with each section of the rule. FDA believes that the
majority of additional BE studies will be reported in ANDAs (submitted
under Sec.  314.94), rather than supplements (reported in Sec.
314.97), because it is unlikely than an ANDA holder will conduct BE
studies with a drug after the drug has been approved. With respect to
the reporting of additional BE studies in amendments (submitted under
Sec.  314.96), this should also account for a small number of reports,
because most BE studies will be conducted on a drug prior to the
submission of the ANDA, and will be reported in the ANDA itself.
    FDA estimates it will require approximately 120 hours of staff time
to prepare and submit each additional complete BE study report, and
approximately 60 hours of staff time for each additional BE summary
report. The Agency believes that a complete report will be required
approximately 20 percent of the time, while a summary will suffice
approximately 80 percent of the time. Based on a weighted-average
calculation using the information presented above, the submission of
each additional BE study is expected to take 72 hours of staff time
([120 x 0.2] + [60 x 0.8]).
    In the Federal Register of June 10, 2011 (76 FR 34081), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. No comments were received.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                 Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Number of
         21 CFR Section              Number of     responses per   Total annual   Average burden    Total hours
                                    respondents     respondent       responses     per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
314.94(a)(7)....................              49               1              49              72           3,528
314.96(a)(1)....................               1               1               1              72              72
314.97..........................               1               1               1              72              72
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............           3,672
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    Dated: September 30, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-25686 Filed 10-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 15308]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4489]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0036; FRL-9272-6]

Completion of the Requirement To Promulgate Emission Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that EPA has completed the emission
standards required by sections 112(c)(3) and (k)(3)(B) and 112(c)(6) of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established dockets for these two actions. The
docket for EPA's action under section 112(c)(3) and (k)(3)(B) is Docket
ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0036. The docket for EPA's action under section
112(c)(6) is Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0505. All documents in the
docket are listed in the Federal Docket Management System index at
http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA
Docket Center, Public Reading Room, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566-
1742.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Nathan Topham, Sector Policies and
Programs Division, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards (D243-
02), Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North
Carolina 27711; telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number (919) 541-
3207; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 112(c)(3) and (k)(3)(B) of the Clean
Air Act (CAA) requires that, by November 15, 2000, EPA promulgate
emission standards to assure that area sources accounting for 90
percent of the aggregate area source emissions of each of the 30 urban
hazardous air pollutants (HAP) are subject to regulation.\1\ Similarly,
section 112(c)(6) of the CAA requires that, by November 15, 2000, EPA
promulgate emission standards to assure that sources accounting for not
less than 90 percent of the aggregate emissions of each of the seven
HAP enumerated in section 112(c)(6)are subject to standards. As a
result of lawsuits filed by Sierra Club alleging that EPA has failed to
complete these actions by the statutory deadline, EPA is under a court
order to complete these obligations. Under the order, which was most
recently amended on January 20, 2011, EPA must complete these
obligations by February 21, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ For a list of the 30 urban HAP, please see National Air
Toxics Program: The Integrate Urban Strategy, 64 FR 38706 (July 19,
1999).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following two technical memoranda document the actions the
Agency has taken to meet these requirements, Topham to Docket, Emission
Standards for Meeting the 90 Percent Requirement Under Section
112(c)(3) and Section 112(k)(3)(B) of the Clean Air Act (found in
Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0036); and Topham to Docket, Emission
Standards for Meeting the 90 Percent Requirement Under Section
112(c)(6) of the Clean Air Act (found in Docket ID EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-
0505). These documents are available in the dockets for these actions.
Based on my review of these two documents, I conclude that EPA has
completed sufficient standards to meet the 90 percent requirement under
both sections 112(c)(3) and(k)(3)(B), and section 112(c)(6).

    Dated: February 21, 2011.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2011-4489 Filed 3-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7090-7091]
[FR Doc No: 2016-02635]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13642-003]

GB Energy Park, LLC; Notice of Application Ready for
Environmental Analysis and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Terms
and Conditions, and Prescriptions

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Unconstructed Major Project.
    b. Project Nos.: 13642-003.
    c. Date Filed: October 1, 2015.
    d. Applicant: GB Energy Park, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Gordon Butte Pumped Storage Project.
    f. Location: Approximately 3 miles west of the City of Martinsdale,
Meagher County, Montana. The proposed project would not occupy any
federal lands.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Carl. E. Borgquist, President, GB Energy
Park, LLC, 209 Wilson Avenue, P.O. Box 309, Bozeman, MT 59771; (406)
585-3006<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Mike Tust;<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, terms and conditions,
recommendations, and prescriptions: 60 days from the issuance date of
this notice; reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of
this notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions
using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000
characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system at
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include the
docket number P-13642-003.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted for filing and is now ready
for environmental analysis. If no substantive comments are received in
response to this notice, the Commission proposes to issue a single EA
by August 2016. If the Commission decides to issue a draft EA and no
substantive comments are received on the draft, a final EA will not be
necessary, in which case the draft EA will become the final EA.
Revisions to the schedule may be made as appropriate.
    l. The Gordon Butte Hydroelectric Project would consist of the
following new facilities: (1) A manually operated head gate on an
existing irrigation canal that provides initial fill and annual make-up
water to the lower reservoir from the existing irrigation canal; (2) a
3,000-foot-long, 1,000-foot-wide upper reservoir created by a 60-foot-
high, 7,500-foot-long concrete-faced rockfill dam; (3) a reinforced
concrete intake/outlet structure at the upper reservoir with six gated
intake bays converging into a central 18-foot-diameter, 750-foot-long
vertical shaft; (4) an 18-foot-diameter, 3,000-foot-long concrete and
steel-lined penstock tunnel leading from the upper reservoir to the
lower reservoir; (5) a 2,300-foot-long, 1,900-foot-wide lower reservoir
created by a combination of excavation and two 60-foot-high, 500- and
750-foot-long concrete-faced rockfill dams; (6) a partially buried 338-
foot-long, 109-foot-wide, 74-foot-high reinforced concrete and steel
powerhouse with four 100-megawatt (MW) ternary Pelton turbine/pump/
generators; (7) a 600-foot-long, 200-foot-wide substation at the
powerhouse site with 13.8-kilovolt (kV) to 230-kV step-up transformers;
(8) a 5.7-mile-long, 230-kV transmission line; (9) a 1,200-foot-long,
1,450-foot wide substation with a 230-kV to 500-kV step-up transformer,
connecting to an existing non-project 500-kV transmission line; and
(11) appurtenant facilities. The project is estimated to provide 1,300
gigawatt-hours annually. No federal lands are included in the project.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS,'' ``REPLY COMMENTS,'' ``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``TERMS AND
CONDITIONS,'' or ``PRESCRIPTIONS;'' (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person submitting the filing; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions or prescriptions must
set forth their evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant. Each filing must be
accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed on the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 4.34(b), and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.

    n. Public notice of the filing of the initial development
application, which has already been given, established the due date for
filing competing applications or notices of intent. Under the
Commission's regulations, any competing development application must be
filed in response to and in compliance with public notice of the
initial development application. No competing applications or notices
of intent may be filed in response to this notice.

    Dated: February 4, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-02635 Filed 2-9-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 65 (Tuesday, April 5, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19660-19661]
[FR Doc No: 2016-07829]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, April
7, 2016 at 4 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(7), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit
consideration of the scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Piwowar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and

    Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact the Office of the
Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

     Dated: March 31, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-07829 Filed 4-1-16; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P