[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 205 (Monday, October 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73125-73126]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25590]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4283-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2016-0001]

Florida; Major Disaster and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of a major
disaster for the State of Florida (FEMA-4283-DR), dated October 8,
2016, and related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 8, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter
dated October 8, 2016, the President issued a major disaster
declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster
Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq. (the
``Stafford Act''), as follows:

    I have determined that the damage in certain areas of the State
of Florida resulting from Hurricane Matthew beginning on October 3,
2016, and continuing, is of sufficient severity and magnitude to
warrant a major disaster declaration under the Robert T. Stafford
Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. 5121 et seq.
(the ``Stafford Act''). Therefore, I declare that such a major
disaster exists in the State of Florida.
    In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby
authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such
amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and
administrative expenses.
    You are authorized to provide assistance for debris removal and
emergency protective measures (Categories A and B) under the Public
Assistance program in the designated areas, Hazard Mitigation
throughout the State, and any other forms of assistance under the
Stafford Act that you deem appropriate subject to completion of
Preliminary Damage Assessments (PDAs). Direct Federal assistance is
authorized.
    Consistent with the requirement that Federal assistance is
supplemental, any Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Hazard Mitigation will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs. Federal funds provided under the Stafford Act for
Public Assistance also will be limited to 75 percent of the total
eligible costs, with the exception of projects that meet the
eligibility criteria for a higher Federal cost-sharing percentage
under the Public Assistance Alternative Procedures Pilot Program for
Debris Removal implemented pursuant to section 428 of the Stafford
Act.

    Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration
for the approved assistance to the extent allowable under the
Stafford Act.

    The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice
that pursuant to the authority vested in the Administrator, under
Executive Order 12148, as amended, Terry L. Quarles, of FEMA is
appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this major
disaster.
    The following areas of the State of Florida have been designated as
adversely affected by this major disaster:

    Brevard, Duval, Flagler, Indian River, Nassau,
    St. Johns, St. Lucie, and Volusia Counties for debris removal
and emergency protective measures (Categories A and B), including
direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance program.
    All areas within the State of Florida are eligible for
assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households in Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-25590 Filed 10-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: November 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 216)]
[Notices]
[Page 68784-68787]
[DOCID:fr09no10-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0712; FRL-9224-3]

Healthy Indoor Environment Protocols for Home Energy Upgrades

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is
announcing the availability of, and soliciting public comments for 30
days, on voluntary Healthy Indoor Environment Protocols for Home Energy
Upgrades, in conjunction with the availability of the Department of
Energy (DOE) Workforce Guidelines for Home Energy. The EPA protocols
are intended for voluntary adoption by weatherization assistance
programs, Federally funded housing programs, private sector home
performance contracting organizations, and others working on
residential retrofit or remodeling efforts.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 9, 2010.

ADDRESSES: A draft of the EPA Protocols is available for review and
public comment at: http://www.epa.gov/iaq/homes/retrofits.html.
    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-
0712, by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments. Note, although comments on the
EPA protocols can be submitted through this Federal Web site, the EPA
protocols are not a Federal regulation.
     E-mail: to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Attn: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2010-0712. The Agency's policy is that all comments received will
be included in the public docket without change and may be made
available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov. As provided in EPA's regulations at 40 CFR
part 2, and in accordance with normal EPA docket procedures, if copies
of any docket materials are requested, a reasonable fee may be charged
for photocopying.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Werling, Indoor Environments
Division, Mail Code 6609J, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania

Avenue, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. What should I consider as I prepare my comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of
the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk
or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM
as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI). In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
     Identify the review document by docket number and other
identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and
page number).
     Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a section or
page number of the review document.
     Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives
and substitute language for your requested changes.
     Describe any assumptions and provide any technical
information and/or data that you used.
     If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how
you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
     Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and
suggest alternatives.
     Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the
use of profanity or personal threats.
     Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Background

    Title IV of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of
1986 (SARA) gave EPA broad authorization to coordinate research in
indoor air quality, develop and disseminate information of the subject,
and coordinate efforts at the Federal, State, and local levels. The
main objectives of the EPA Indoor Environments program include the
protection of public health by promoting healthy environments;
development and implementation of control strategies which would
prevent, diagnose, abate, and mitigate indoor pollution, including the
development and dissemination of guidance on those aspects of building
design and construction, operation and maintenance that affect the
indoor environment; and the development and dissemination of
information to educate key audiences about indoor air pollution and its
associated health risks, mitigation, and control strategies. Using the
best science available, EPA develops and disseminates information,
guidance and solution-oriented technologies and serves as a catalyst
for action by guiding research, using innovative and creative risk
communication tools and by building public-private partnerships.
    As part of these responsibilities, EPA is developing voluntary
Healthy Indoor Environment Protocols for Home Energy Upgrades. These
protocols are intended for voluntary adoption by weatherization
assistance programs, Federally funded housing programs, private sector
home performance contracting organizations, and others working on
residential energy efficiency retrofits, remodeling or other home
improvement efforts. A draft is now available for review and comment.
All of this information--including the draft document and additional
comment-submitting instructions--can be found on the Agency's Indoor
Air Quality Web site at: http://www.epa.gov/iaq/homes/retrofits.html.
    Concurrently, in May 2009, the Vice President's Middle Class Task
Force asked the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) to
develop recommendations for Federal action to lay the architecture for
a self-sustaining home energy efficiency retrofit industry. In
response, CEQ facilitated a broad interagency process that resulted in
the development of six recommendations described in detail in a report
titled Recovery Through Retrofit.\1\ These recommendations were
carefully crafted to stimulate the growth of a vibrant, private sector-
led market for residential energy efficiency retrofits. They include
establishment of a uniform set of national guidelines to promote high-
quality, safe and healthy energy efficiency retrofit work. DOE
developed Workforce Guidelines for Home Energy Upgrades in response to
this recommendation, in concert with EPA's development of Healthy
Indoor Environment Protocols for Home Energy Upgrades.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/Recovery_
Through_Retrofit_Final_Report.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Together, the DOE and EPA documents will: Provide a robust and
practical set of resources for retrofit contractors, trainers, and
program administrators; help improve the quality of the work performed
in this expanding industry; promote occupant health and safety; and
drive consumer demand for energy efficiency retrofit services. EPA
encourages reviewers with broader interest in home energy retrofits to
also review the DOE Workforce Guidelines, available for public comment
until January 7, 2011 [http://www.weatherization.energy.gov/retrofit_
guidelines].

A. Why is EPA developing voluntary Healthy Indoor Environment Protocols
for Home Energy Upgrades?

    Millions of American homes will be retrofitted in the coming years
to improve energy efficiency or make them more ``green.'' Integrated
healthy home and energy efficiency retrofit activities can lower
utility costs for Americans and improve indoor air quality in homes at
the same time. However, there is the potential for weatherization and
other energy efficiency retrofit activities to negatively impact indoor
air quality and public health--if the appropriate home assessment is
not made before work begins and issues that may impact indoor air
quality are not appropriately addressed. These Protocols provide
guidance for conducting such home assessments and also provide the
specific responses necessary to maintain or improve indoor air quality
in conjunction with energy efficiency retrofits or other remodeling
activities.
    The Protocols are intended to enhance the ability of other Federal
agencies, industry standard organizations, State and local programs,
and the home energy retrofit industry (i.e., home weatherization,
energy efficiency retrofit, and housing rehabilitation professionals)
to better integrate health protections into energy focused programs.
The Protocols apply to single family and multi-family low-rise
residential dwellings. These Protocols provide recommended minimum
specifications and additional best practices for protection of occupant
health and, together with better resources for contractors, will
facilitate increased home energy efficiency, improve the quality of the
work performed, and reduce failures and call-backs for contractors.

B. Why are better health protections needed for home energy retrofits?

    Low-income weatherization and private sector home performance
contracting programs reduce energy bills, improve comfort, and often
improve health and safety in the homes of many American families. These
activities should never adversely affect a home's indoor environment,
occupant health, or worker health and safety. The most urgent public
health issues related to home energy retrofits, such as combustion
safety, already have rigorous standards in place that are enforced
through program requirements and processes. However, there are other
public health issues that can be affected by home energy retrofits and
remodeling work such as occupant exposure to moisture/mold, radon, and
lead. These draft Healthy Indoor Environment Protocols provide guidance
on how best to address these issues and the steps necessary to maintain
or improve indoor air quality while making energy efficiency home
improvements. Adoption of the EPA Protocols and other protective
guidelines such as the DOE Workforce Guidelines will help minimize the
potential unintended health impacts of retrofit and remodeling
activities.
    Fortunately, the expansion of the DOE's weatherization assistance
program (WAP) through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)
of 2009, and other home energy retrofit initiatives provide unique
opportunities to simultaneously improve the energy efficiency and the
healthfulness of American homes. Integrated healthy home and retrofit
activities can lower utility costs for Americans, while improving the
indoor air quality in millions of homes. EPA is working with DOE and
other programs to identify opportunities to reduce or eliminate
barriers to incorporating more health protective best practices into
energy efficiency retrofit programs. These protocols, when finalized
will serve as a core set of practices that can be integrated into
evolving program standards, training curricula and other elements of
energy efficiency retrofit programs.

C. What information is included in the DRAFT protocols?

    This DRAFT document includes recommended protocols for assessment
of indoor environmental quality issues, recommended minimum actions,
and recommended expanded actions to promote improved occupant health
through home energy retrofits. Each of these is described below.
    This document DOES NOT:
     Set new EPA regulatory standards;
     Provide guidance for diagnosing occupant health problems
or building-related illness;
     Replace the need for training or training documents; or
     Provide detailed guidance on how to achieve the intent of
each recommendation in all situations.
    The document is organized to highlight priority health concerns
that may relate to home energy efficiency retrofits. Priority issues
are identified based on whether they are known to pose significant
health risks to occupants and whether they can be affected by energy
efficiency retrofit activities. For each ``Priority Issue'' identified
in Column 1, the matrix identifies the following:
    1. ``Assessment Protocols'' in Column 2 provide EPA-recommended
assessment protocols for evaluating both existing conditions of concern
and the potential for additional health concerns that may arise as a
result of retrofit activities. EPA anticipates recommending adoption of
the assessment protocols into weatherization and home energy retrofit
assessment and audit standards and materials.
    2. ``Minimum Actions'' in Column 3 include actions that
weatherization and home energy retrofit contractors should take to
ensure that the work they perform in a home does not introduce new
health concerns or make existing conditions worse. These often
reference existing standards. EPA anticipates recommending adoption of
the minimum actions into weatherization and home energy retrofit
standards and materials, and removal or modification of program rules
that prohibit these recommended actions.
    3. ``Expanded Actions'' in Column 4 include recommended indoor
environment improvements that can be made during many home energy
retrofit projects. The expanded actions are usually low-cost, simple
improvements that can be performed by home energy retrofit workers with
proper training and sufficient resources. EPA anticipates recommending
incorporation of the expanded actions into weatherization assistance
program and other home energy retrofit program guidance and training
materials, and collaboration to help overcome barriers to these
recommended healthy homes actions.
    Additional resources (standards, guidelines, etc.) have been
included for further information on each issue, including recommended
assessment and performance standards, and supplemental guidance
information.
    In addition, EPA anticipates the need for supplemental assessment
tools such as worksheets and checklists, to help assessors and
contractors manage critical job information. Therefore, EPA plans to
develop sample assessment tools to accompany these protocols, such as
the following sample tool concepts:
     Sample Mold and Moisture Assessment Form.
     Sample Radon Testing and Assessment Form.
     Sample Home Ventilation Worksheet.

D. How is EPA recommending the protocols be used?

    These protocols were developed to assist weatherization assistance
programs and other home energy retrofit and remodeling programs to fill
in gaps in their program standards related to indoor environment health
protections, and provide additional guidance for those able to go
beyond recommended minimum health protections. EPA recommends that
these protocols (and supplemental tools) be voluntarily adopted in
whole or in part, for the following purposes:
     To help develop or enhance standardized training program
requirements.
     To help refine and update program performance standards,
materials, and resources to better protect occupant health.
     To inform revisions to program funding rules (i.e., change
allowable expenses for health and safety as appropriate).
    Specifically, EPA anticipates recommending the following for
weatherization assistance and home energy retrofit programs:
    1. Adoption of the assessment protocols into weatherization
assistance and other home energy retrofit program assessment or audit
standards,
    2. Adoption of the minimum actions into weatherization assistance
and other home energy retrofit program standards, and removal or
modification of program rules that prohibit these recommended minimum
actions,
    3. Incorporation of the expanded actions into weatherization
assistance and other home energy retrofit program guidance and training
materials, and collaboration to help overcome barriers to these
recommended healthy homes actions.

    Dated: November 4, 2010.
Michael P. Flynn,
Director, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air.
[FR Doc. 2010-28375 Filed 11-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

Issued by the Department of Transportation on October 23, 2006

   NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2002-12496

________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. (AMERICAN) filed 6/28/06 for:

XX Renewal of exemption under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to provide the following
service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property and mail
between the United States and Vietnam.  American uses the authority to
engage in codesharing service to Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City on Japan
Airlines International Co., Ltd. flights via Tokyo, Japan.

Applicant rep: Carl B. Nelson, Jr.<PHONE_NUMBER>    DOT Analyst: Thuy
H. Cooper<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (subject to conditions, see below)

The above action was effective when taken: October 23, 2006, through
October 23, 2008, or until 90 days after final Department action on
American’s corresponding application for a certificate of public
convenience and necessity in Docket OST-2000-8516, whichever occurs
earlier.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		      Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreement
between the United States and Vietnam.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

XX  Holder’s certificates of public convenience and necessity

	XX  Standard exemption conditions (attached)

XX  Statement of Authorization approving the American/JAL code-share
operations

dated February 18, 1999, and conditions therein (Notice of Action Taken,
Docket 1999-4994)

________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department's regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that

(1) our action was consistent with Department policy; (2) grant of the
exemption authority was consistent with the public interest; and (3)
grant of the authority would not constitute a major regulatory action
under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.  To the extent not
granted, we denied all requests in the referenced Docket.  We may amend,
modify, or revoke the authority granted in this Notice at any time
without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

  HYPERLINK "http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp"
http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, including, but not limited to, 49 CFR Part 1544.
To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder shall, before commencing any new service
(including charter flights) to or from a foreign airport, contact its
International Principal Security Inspector (IPSI) to advise the IPSI of
its plans and to find out whether the Transportation Security
Administration has determined that security is adequate to allow such
airport(s) to be served; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

05/2004

 PAGE

 PAGE   2


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 3645]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01360]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0276; Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-1]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment, Establishment, and Revocation of Multiple Air Traffic
Service (ATS) Routes in the Vicinity of Neosho, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule, correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting the effective date listed and the area
navigation (RNAV) routes T-411 and T-413 regulatory text title
information formatting listed in the final rule for Docket No. FAA-
2021-0276 that published in the Federal Register of January 14, 2022.
That final rule amended Jet Route J-181 and VHF Omnidirectional Range
(VOR) Federal airways V-13, V-14, V-15, and V-307; established RNAV
routes T-411 and T-413; and removed VOR Federal airway V-506 in the
vicinity of Neosho, MO. This action reflects the correct final rule
effective date and the correct RNAV routes T-411 and T-413 title
information formatting.

DATES: The effective date of the final rule published on January 14,
2022 (87 FR 2320) is corrected to March 24, 2022. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA published a final rule for Docket No. FAA-2021-0276 in the
Federal Register (87 FR 2320; January 14, 2022) amending Jet Route J-
181 and VOR Federal airways V-13, V-14, V-15, and V-307; establishing
RNAV routes T-411 and T-413; and removing VOR Federal airway V-506 in
the vicinity of Neosho, MO. Subsequent to publication, it was
determined that the effective date published in the final rule
incorrectly listed the date as January 27, 2022, and the regulatory
text T-411 and T-413 title information formatting in the descriptions
was published in all capital letters and did not conform to the FAA
Order JO 7400.2 regulatory guidance for RNAV route descriptions. The
correct effective date for this action is March 24, 2022, and the
correct T-411 and T-413 title information formatting should not be in
all capital letters. The corrections are reflected in this final rule
correction.

Need for Correction

    As published, the final rule contained errors in the effective date
listed and the T-411 and T-413 regulatory text title information
formatting and require correction. This corrective action is necessary
to avoid confusion as to the correct effective date and to publish the
new RNAV route descriptions using the correct formatting for that
rulemaking, Docket No. FAA-2021-0276.

Correction to Final Rule

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the
effective date and the T-411 and T-413 RNAV route descriptions
reflected in Docket No. FAA-2021-0276, as published in the Federal
Register of January 14, 2022 (87 FR 2320, FR Doc. 2022-00458), are
corrected as follows:
    1. In FR Doc. 2022-00458, appearing on page 2320, in the second
column, at lines 1 and 2, correct ``January 27, 2022'' to read ``March
24, 2022.''

0
2. In FR Doc. 2022-00458, appearing on page 2322, in the first column,
at line 9, correct ``T-411 RAZORBACK, AR (RZC) TO LINCOLN, NE (LNK)
[NEW]'' to read ``T-411 Razorback, AR (RZC) to Lincoln, NE (LNK)
[New].''

0
3. In FR Doc. 2022-00458, appearing on page 2322, in the first column,
at line 15, correct ``T-413 RAZORBACK, AR (RZC) TO PIERRE, SC (PIR)
[NEW]'' to read ``T-413 Razorback, AR (RZC) to Pierre, SD (PIR)
[New].''

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 21, 2022.
Michael R. Beckles,
Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2022-01360 Filed 1-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 33 (Tuesday, February 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11216-11217]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03317]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC17-78-000.
    Applicants: MS Solar 2, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization of Transaction under
Section 203 of the FPA of MS Solar 2, LLC.
    Filed Date: 2/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20170213-5336.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/6/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER17-114-002.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2017-02-13 Compliance Order No. 827
Response FERC Request Additional Information to be effective 9/21/2016.
    Filed Date: 2/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20170213-5264.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-387-001.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: 2017-02-13_Deficiency response--Att
FF-6 filing to address cost allocation gap to be effective 1/18/2017.
    Filed Date: 2/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20170213-5222.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-950-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Errata to ConEd Wheeling Termination
filing in ER17-950-000 to be effective 5/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 2/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20170213-5201.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-968-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2017-02-13_SA 2527 ITC-
Consumers 3rd Amended GIA (J161) to be effective 2/14/2017.
    Filed Date: 2/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20170213-5204.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/6/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following qualifying
facility filings:

    Docket Numbers: QF17-673-000.
    Applicants: Beaver Creek Wind II, LLC.
    Description: Application for Certification of Beaver Creek Wind II,
LLC.
    Filed Date: 2/9/17.
    Accession Number: 20170209-5303.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/2/17.

    Docket Numbers: QF17-674-000.
    Applicants: Beaver Creek Wind III, LLC.
    Description: Application for Certification of Beaver Creek Wind
III, LLC.
    Filed Date: 2/9/17.
    Accession Number: 20170209-5304.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/2/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings

must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 14, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-03317 Filed 2-17-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 193)]
[Notices]
[Page 61744-61745]
[DOCID:fr06oc10-75]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER10-2836-000]

WFM Intermediary New England, LLC; Supplemental Notice That
Initial Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section
204 Authorization

September 27, 2010.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
WFM Intermediary New England, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is October 18, 2010.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a

document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any
FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-25090 Filed 10-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 55 (Friday, March 21, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 15712-15715]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06268]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2014-0110
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Low Country Splash, Wando River, Cooper
River, and Charleston Harbor, Charleston, SC

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to issue a special local regulation
on the waters of the Wando River, Cooper River, and Charleston Harbor
in Charleston, SC during the Low Country Splash in Charleston, SC, on
May 24, 2014, from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. This special local regulation is
necessary to ensure the safety of participants, spectators, and the
general public during the event. The special local regulation will
temporarily restrict vessel traffic in a portion of the Wando River and
Charleston Harbor, preventing non-participant vessels from entering,
transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the regulated
area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before April 4, 2014. Requests for public meetings must be
received by the Coast Guard by April 4, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Chief Warrant Officer Christopher Ruleman, Sector
Charleston Office of Waterways Management, Coast Guard; telephone (843)
740-3184, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions
on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl Collins,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online,
it will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, type the

docket number USCG-2014-0110 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, type the docket number USCG-2014-
0110 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this rulemaking. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one on or before 4 April, 2014, using one of the methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please explain why you believe a public
meeting would be beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place announced by a later
notice in the Federal Register.

B. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis for the rule is the Coast Guard's Authority to
establish special local regulations: 33 U.S.C 1233. The purpose of the
proposed rule is to ensure safety of life on the navigable water of the
United States during the Low Country Splash.

C. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    On Saturday, May 24, 2014, from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. the Low Country
Splash is scheduled to take place on the waters of the Wando River,
Cooper River, and Charleston Harbor. The race will commence at Daniel
Island Pier, transit south in the Wando River, crossing the
navigational channel at Hobcaw Point and continue South into Charleston
Harbor. The race will finish at Charleston Harbor Resort Marina. The
event consists of a large number of swimmers. There will be safety
vessels preceding the participating swimmers, and following the last
participating swimmers. This event poses significant risks to
participants, spectators, and the boating public because of the large
number of swimmers and recreational vessels that are expected in the
area of the event. The special local regulation is necessary to ensure
the safety of participants, spectators, and vessels from the hazards
associated with the event.
    The special local regulation will designate a temporary regulated
area on the Wando River, Cooper River, and Charleston Harbor in
Charleston, South Carolina. The special local regulation will be
enforced from 7 a.m. until 9 a.m. on May 24, 2014. Persons and vessels
may not enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a
designated representative.
    Persons and vessels desiring to enter, transit through, anchor in,
or remain within the regulated area may contact the Captain of the Port
Charleston by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a designated
representative via VHF radio on channel 16, to request authorization.
If authorization to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within
the regulated area is granted by the Captain of the Port Charleston or
a designated representative, all persons and vessels receiving such
authorization must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will
provide notice of the special local regulation by Local Notice to
Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated
representatives.

D. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    The economic impact of this proposed rule is not significant for
the following reasons: (1) The special local regulations will be
enforced for a maximum of 2 hours for only one day; (2) non-participant
persons and vessels may enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area during the enforcement periods if authorized
by the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative;
(3) vessels not able to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the regulated area without authorization from the Captain of the
Port Charleston or a designated representative may operate in the
surrounding areas during the enforcement period; and (4) the Coast
Guard will provide advance notification of the special local regulation
to the local maritime community by Local Notice to Mariners and
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    This proposed rule may affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: the owner or operators of vessels intending to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area
during the enforcement period. For the reasons discussed in Regulatory
Planning and Review section above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity

and that this rule would have a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically
affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category
of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves a special
local regulation issued in conjunction with a regatta or marine parade.
This proposed rule is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. We seek
any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add a temporary Sec.  100.35T07-0110 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.35T07-0110  Special Local Regulation; Low Country Splash,
Wando River, Cooper River, and Charleston Harbor, Charleston, SC.

    (a) Regulated Area. The following regulated area is established as
a special local regulation. All waters within a moving zone, beginning
at Daniel Island Pier in approximate position 32[deg]51[min]20[sec] N,
079[deg]54[min]06[sec] W, South along the coast of Daniel Island,
across the Wando River to Hobcaw Yacht Club, in approximate position
32[deg]49'20'' N, 079[deg]53'49'' W, South along the coast of Mt.
Pleasant, S.C., to Charleston Harbor Resort Marina, in approximate
position 32[deg]47'20'' N, 079[deg]54'39'' W. There will be a temporary
Channel Closer from approximately 0730 a.m. to 0815 a.m. on May 24,
2014 between Wando River Terminal Buoy 3 (LLNR 3305), and Wando River
Terminal Buoy 5 (LLNR 3315). The zone will at all times extend 75 yards
both in front of the lead safety vessel preceding the first race
participants; 75 yards behind the safety vessel trailing the last race
participants; and at all times extending 100 yards on either side of
participating race and safety vessels. Information regarding the
identity of the lead safety vessel and the last safety vessel will be
provided 2 days prior to the race via broadcast notice to mariners and
marine safety information bulletins.
    (b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means Coast
Guard

Patrol Commanders, including Coast Guard coxswains, petty officers, and
other officers operating Coast Guard vessels, and Federal, state, and
local officers designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port
Charleston in the enforcement of the regulated areas.
    (c) Regulations. (1) All persons and vessels, except those
participating in the Low Country Splash or serving as safety vessels
are prohibited from entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or
remaining within the regulated area. Persons and vessels desiring to
enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area
may contact the Captain of the Port Charleston by telephone at (843)
740-7050, or a designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16,
to request authorization. If authorization to enter, transit through,
anchor in, or remain within the regulated area is granted by the
Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated representative, all
persons and vessels receiving such authorization must comply with the
instructions of the Captain of the Port Charleston or a designated
representative.
    (2) The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by
Marine Safety Information Bulletins, Local Notice to Mariners,
Broadcast Notice to Mariners, and on-scene designated representatives.
    (d) Enforcement Date. This rule will be enforced from 7 a.m. to 9
a.m. May 24, 2014.

    Dated: March 4, 2014.
R.R. Rodriguez,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Charleston.
[FR Doc. 2014-06268 Filed 3-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 75 (Friday, April 17, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21318-21320]
[FR Doc No: 2020-08072]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0947; Product Identifier 2017-SW-059-AD; Amendment
39-19902; AD 2020-08-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Robinson Helicopter Company Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Robinson Helicopter Company (Robinson) Model R44 and R44 II
helicopters. This AD was prompted by reports of cracking in certain
tail rotor blades. This AD requires visually checking each tail rotor
blade for a crack. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective May 22, 2020.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Robinson Helicopter Company, 2901 Airport Drive, Torrance, CA
90505; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; or at https://robinsonheli.com/technical-support/. You may view a copy of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort
Worth, TX 76177.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0947; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this AD, any comments received, and other information. The address for
Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M 30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12 140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Guo, Aerospace Engineer, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California
90712; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to Robinson Model R44 and
R44 II helicopters with a tail rotor blade part number (P/N) C029-1 or
P/N C029-2 installed. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on May
23, 2018 (83 FR 23829). The NPRM was prompted by reports of P/N C029-1
and P/N C029-2 tail rotor blades with fatigue cracks at the leading
edge. The cracks were caused by high fatigue stresses due to resonance
when the blades were at high pitch angles from large left pedal inputs.
The NPRM proposed to require visually checking each tail rotor blade
for a crack. The proposed requirements were intended to detect a
cracked tail rotor blade and prevent loss of the blade and subsequent
loss of directional control. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
    Since the FAA issued the NPRM, the website address for Robinson
changed. This AD updates that website address.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to comment on the NPRM. The
following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's
response to each comment.
    Request: Robinson requested the FAA change the wording in the
Discussion section that states the cracks in tail rotor blades were
caused by ``stresses due to resonance when the blades were at high
pitch angles from large left pedal inputs'' to ``stresses during
maneuvers with large left pedal inputs.''
    FAA Response: The FAA disagrees. The wording in the NPRM provides
greater detail with regard to the mechanics of the cause of the
cracking.
    Request: Robinson requested the FAA change the wording in the
Discussion section that describes the proposed actions' intentions by
adding the word ``possible'', which would read as follows: ``prevent
possible loss of the blade.'' Robinson states that even with a crack,
loss of the blade is possible, but not certain.
    FAA Response: The FAA disagrees. The unsafe condition described in
this AD is a crack in the tail rotor blade. The current wording does
not state the helicopter will lose a tail rotor blade but rather loss
of a blade could occur. The description of the unsafe condition states
that the condition ``could result in the loss of the tail rotor.''
    Request: Robinson requested the FAA correct the two instances of
the wording ``tail leading edge'' by deleting the word ``tail.'' The
first instance is in the Proposed AD Requirements section and the
second instance is in the Required Actions paragraph.
    FAA Response: The FAA agrees and has made these corrections.
    Request: Robinson requested that the FAA change the Applicability
paragraph by adding the following: ``Tail rotor blade part number is
visible on data plate located between bearings in blade root.''
    FAA Response: The FAA disagrees because the addition is
unnecessary. Parties may refer to the data plate or the aircraft's
records to determine which part-numbered tail rotor blades are
installed. If they are uncertain about the location of the data plate,
they can refer to service information documents that interested parties
have access to through their normal course of business.
    Request: Robinson requested that the FAA change the wording in the
Unsafe Condition paragraph to state, ``This AD defines the unsafe
condition as a possible crack in the tail rotor blade'' because not all
blades have a crack.
    FAA Response: The FAA disagrees. The unsafe condition that is being
addressed is a crack in a blade.
    Request: Robinson requested that the FAA change the wording in the
Required Actions section from the checks of the tail rotor blades may
be conducted ``by the owner/operator'' to ``by an owner/operator.''
    FAA Response: The FAA disagrees. The language requested by the
commenter would unacceptably broaden the AD requirement. The FAA
intended to allow the owner or operator of the aircraft, who holds at
least a private pilot certificate, to perform the check when
maintenance personnel are not present. The requested change in language
may be interpreted to allow a pilot to perform the check on any
aircraft, including aircraft that the pilot does not own or operate.

    Request: Robinson requested the FAA change the wording in the
Required Actions paragraph from: ``If there is a crack, before further
flight, replace the tail rotor blade'' to ``If a crack is detected,
replace tail rotor blade before further flight.''
    FAA Response: The FAA disagrees. The wording in the NPRM
sufficiently explains that if there is a crack, the tail rotor blade
must be replaced.

FAA's Determination

    The FAA has reviewed the relevant information, considered the
comments received, and determined that an unsafe condition exists and
is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type design
and that air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD
requirements as proposed with the changes described previously. These
changes are consistent with the intent proposed in the NPRM for
correcting the unsafe condition and will not increase the economic
burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.

Related Service Information

    The FAA has reviewed Robinson SB-83, dated May 30, 2012 (SB-83),
which specifies, within 10 flight hours or by June 30, 2012, whichever
occurs first, inserting a caution page into the Pilot's Operating
Handbook. The caution page specifies inspecting the leading edges of
each tail rotor blade for a crack before each flight. The caution page
also advises that to reduce fatigue stress damage to the tail rotor
blades, pilots should avoid maneuvers that require large left pedal
inputs. SB-83 specifies that the caution page may be removed when the
tail rotor blades are replaced with tail rotor blade P/N C029-3.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 1,631 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. The FAA estimates that operators may incur the following
costs in order to comply with this AD. Labor costs are estimated at $85
per work-hour.
    Visually checking the tail rotor blades for a crack takes about 0.2
work-hour for an estimated cost of $17 per helicopter and $27,727 for
the U.S. fleet per check cycle.
    Replacing a tail rotor blade takes about 2 work-hours and parts
cost about $3,080 for an estimated replacement cost of $3,250 per
blade.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2020-08-10 Robinson Helicopter Company: Amendment 39-19902; Docket
No. FAA-2017-0947; Product Identifier 2017-SW-059-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This AD applies to Robinson Helicopter Company (Robinson) Model
R44 and R44 II helicopters, certificated in any category, with a
tail rotor blade part number (P/N) C029-1 or P/N C029-2 installed.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in a tail rotor
blade. This condition could result in the loss of the tail rotor and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

(c) Effective Date

    This AD is effective May 22, 2020.

(d) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

(e) Required Actions

    Within 50 hours time-in-service after the effective date of this
AD and thereafter before each flight:
    (1) Visually check each tail rotor blade for a crack in the
leading edge, paying particular attention to the area in the most
inboard white paint stripe. Wipe the blades clean, if necessary, to
ensure any potential crack is visible. The actions required by this
paragraph may be performed by the owner/operator (pilot) holding at
least a private pilot certificate and must be entered into the
aircraft records showing compliance with this AD in accordance with
14 CFR 43.9(a)(1) through (4) and 14 CFR 91.417(a)(2)(v). The record
must be maintained as required by 14 CFR 91.417, 121.380, or
135.439.
    (2) If there is a crack, before further flight, replace the tail
rotor blade.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOC)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs
for this AD. Send your proposal to: James Guo, Aerospace Engineer,
Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount Blvd., Lakewood,
California 90712; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office
or certificate holding district office before operating any aircraft
complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(g) Related Information

    Robinson Helicopter Company R44 Service Bulletin SB-83, dated
May 30, 2012, which is not incorporated by reference, contains
additional information about the subject of this AD. For service
information identified in this AD, contact Robinson Helicopter
Company, 2901 Airport Drive, Torrance, CA 90505; telephone 310-539-
0508; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; or at https://robinsonheli.com/technical-support/. You may view a copy of information at the FAA, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room
6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

(h) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6410, Tail Rotor
Blades.

    Issued on April 13, 2020.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-08072 Filed 4-16-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 248 (Friday, December 27, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 71335-71338]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27768]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0987; Product Identifier 2019-NM-144-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc., Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series
100 & 440) airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports that
during airplane wing fatigue testing, fatigue cracks were found on the
lower right-hand-side wing plank at the end of the integrally machined
stringers, which led to a determination that new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations are necessary. This proposed AD would
require, for certain airplanes, revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations. The FAA is proposing this

AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by February
10, 2020.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec
H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center North America toll-
free telephone 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial telephone 1-514-855-2999;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>internet http://www.bombardier.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-
231-3195.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0987; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 516-
794-5531; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0987;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-144-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invites comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
    The FAA will post all comments, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact the agency receives about this NPRM.

Discussion

    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2019-21, dated May 15,
2019 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for
certain Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 &
440) airplanes. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2019-0987.
    This proposed AD was prompted by reports that during airplane wing
fatigue testing, fatigue cracks were found on the lower right-hand-side
wing plank at the end of the integrally machined stringers, which led
to a determination that new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. The FAA is proposing this AD to address
undetected cracks on the lower wing plank at the stringer run-out,
which could affect the structural integrity of the wing. See the MCAI
for additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Bombardier has issued Nondestructive Testing Manual, CSP A-010,
Revision 40, dated November 10, 2018. This service information
describes airworthiness limitations for doing a special detailed
inspection of the lower wing skin splice joints at buttock line (BL)
45.00, wing station (WS) 65.75, and WS148.00. Bombardier has also
issued Temporary Revision 2B-2273, dated October 31, 2019, to Appendix
B--Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2 of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19
Maintenance Requirements Manual. This service information describes
airworthiness limitations for doing an inspection for cracking on the
lower wing plank at the stringer run-out. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all the relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type design.

Proposed Requirements of This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations.
    This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections).
Compliance with these actions is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance according to paragraph
(j)(1) of this proposed AD.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the MCAI

    Paragraph (h) of this proposed AD would require revising the
maintenance/inspection program to incorporate Airworthiness Limitations
(AWL) Task 57-21-169 for certain airplanes. The corresponding MCAI
requirement specifies incorporating this task using Bombardier
Temporary Revision 2B-2269, dated July 18, 2018, to Appendix B--
Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2 of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19
Maintenance Requirements Manual. However, since the MCAI was issued,
that service information has been revised to Temporary Revision 2B-
2273, dated October 31, 2019 (``Temporary Revision 2B-2273'').
Temporary Revision 2B-2273 defines the compliance time threshold, which
begins from the time the airplane entered into service. This

proposed AD would require incorporating Temporary Revision 2B-2273.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 464 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
    The FAA has determined that revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator,
although the FAA recognizes that this number may vary from operator to
operator. In the past, the FAA has estimated that this action takes 1
work-hour per airplane. Since operators incorporate maintenance or
inspection program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has
determined that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-
airplane estimate. Therefore, the FAA estimates the total cost per
operator to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).
    According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this
proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost
impact on affected individuals. The FAA does not control warranty
coverage for affected individuals. As a result, the FAA has included
all known costs in the cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Bombardier, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2019-0987; Product Identifier 2019-
NM-144-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments by February 10, 2020.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc., Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, certificated in any category,
serial number 7003 and subsequent.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports that during airplane wing
fatigue testing, fatigue cracks were found on the lower right-hand-
side wing plank at the end of the integrally machined stringers,
which led to a determination that new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD
to address undetected cracks on the lower wing plank at the stringer
run-out, which could affect the structural integrity of the wing.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision for Task 57-21-112

    For airplanes on which Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-57-044
has not been done: Within 30 days after the effective date of this
AD, revise the existing maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate airworthiness limitations (AWL) task 57-
21-112, as specified in Bombardier Nondestructive Testing Manual,
CSP A-010, Revision 40, dated November 10, 2018. The initial
compliance time for doing the task is at the time specified in
Bombardier Nondestructive Testing Manual, CSP A-010, Revision 40,
dated November 10, 2018, or within 30 days after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs later.

(h) Maintenance or Inspection Program Revision for Task 57-21-169

    For airplanes on which Bombardier Service Bulletin 601R-57-044
has been done: Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD,
revise the existing maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate AWL task 57-21-169, as specified in
Bombardier Temporary Revision 2B-2273, dated October 31, 2019, to
Appendix B--Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2 of the Bombardier
CL-600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual. The initial compliance
time for doing the task is at the time specified in Bombardier
Temporary Revision 2B-2273, dated October 31, 2019, to Appendix B--
Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2 of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19
Maintenance Requirements Manual, or within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.

(i) No Alternative Actions or Intervals

    After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been
revised as required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be used
unless the actions or intervals are approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the

procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the certification office, send it to
ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved
AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards
district office/certificate holding district office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(k) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian AD CF-2019-21, dated May 15, 2019, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2019-0987.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Aziz Ahmed,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe and Propulsion Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; Widebody Customer Response Center
North America toll-free telephone 1-866-538-1247 or direct-dial
telephone 1-514-855-2999; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this service information at the FAA, Transport Standards
Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on December 17, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-27768 Filed 12-26-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 242 (Friday, December 17, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78984-78985]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31709]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13213-001]

Lock 14 Hydro Partners; Notice of Intent To File License
Application, Filing of Pre-Application Document, and Approving Use of
the Traditional Licensing Process

December 10, 2010.
    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File License Application and
Request to Use the Traditional Licensing Process.
    b. Project No.: 13213-001.
    c. Dated Filed: October 12, 2010.
    d. Submitted By: Lock 14 Hydro Partners.
    e. Name of Project: Kentucky Lock and Dam 14 Project.
    f. Location: On the Kentucky River, in Lee County, Kentucky.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 4.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    h. Potential Applicant Contact: David Brown Kinloch, Soft Energy
Associates, Agent for Lock 14 Hydro Partners, 414 South Wenzel Street,
Louisville, KY 40204,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Sean Murphy at<PHONE_NUMBER>; or e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Lock 14 Hydro Partners filed its request to use the Traditional
Licensing Process on October 11, 2010. Lock 14 Hydro Partners provided
public notice of its request on November 15, 2010. In a letter dated
December 10, 2010, the Director of the Office of Energy Projects
approved Lock 14 Hydro Partners' request to use the Traditional
Licensing Process.
    k. With this notice, we are initiating informal consultation with:
(a) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and/or NOAA Fisheries under
section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and the joint agency
regulations thereunder at 50 CFR, part 402; (b) NOAA Fisheries under
section 305(b) of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and
Management Act and implementing regulations at 50 CFR 600.920; and (c)
the Kentucky State Historic Preservation Officer, as required by
Section 106, National Historical Preservation Act, and the implementing
regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR
800.2.
    l. Lock 14 Hydro Partners filed a Pre-Application Document (PAD;
including a proposed process plan and schedule) with the Commission,
pursuant to 18 CFR 5.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    m. A copy of the PAD is available for review at the Commission in
the Public

Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site (http://www.ferc.gov), using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, of for TTY,
(202) 502-8659. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in paragraph h.
    n. Register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filing and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31709 Filed 12-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


   1) We suggest that some clarification is needed with respect to statements in the rule regarding the date on which the Tailoring Rule will take effect.  On page 11, the first sentence of the first full paragraph states:  "The effect of EPA narrowing its approval in this manner is that there will be no federally-approved title V program that requires permits for sources due to emissions of GHG below the final Tailoring Rule threshold of 100,000 tpy CO2e (and 100 tpy mass basis), which takes effect on July 1, 2011."

The first phase of the Tailoring Rule, however, takes effect for both PSD and Title V on January 2, 2011 (although the second phase takes effect on July 1, 2011).  See, e.g., 75 Fed. Reg. at 31,516/2, 31,523/2.  EPA should clarify why July 1, 2011 is the appropriate date.  We also note that the July 1, 2011 date appears elsewhere in the Rule -- for example on page 9, line 1.

   2) Page 1:  Throughout the text, consider replacing "limit" with "revise" (or "narrow") because the word "limit" carries an unnecessary negative connotation and, in this context, may be interpreted to broadly mean more SIPs than EPA intended, which could potentially confuse readers.  The rest of the sentence on page 1 in the summary does a good job of explaining this rule's purpose.

   3) Page 11: For clarity, suggest qualifying the statement "[s]tates affected by this rule will not be required to take any action as a result of this rule" by explaining that states need not take any further action under the federal Clean Air Act as a result of this rule. Also, suggest referring the reader to the passages in "Limitation of Approval of Prevention of Significant Deterioration Provisions Concerning Greenhouse Gas Emitting-Sources in State Implementation Plans" where EPA urges states to amend state law to align with the Tailoring Rule.

   4) Page 15:  It might be helpful to add a citation to the first sentence of the first full paragraph to support the statement that CAA § 301(a) "incorporates the authority of an agency to reconsider its actions."

   5) Page 25:  First sentence of the first full paragraph is redundant as a similar statement appears on the previous page, which could potentially confuse readers. Suggest deleting second instance on page 25.

   6) Page 34:  In the middle of the page, it might be helpful to provide a citation for the statement "Reconsidering prior rulemakings, when necessary, is part of `[EPA's] functions' under the CAA ."