[Federal Register: January 7, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 4)]
[Notices]
[Page 747-748]
[DOCID:fr07ja09-63]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59177; File No. SR-NYSE-2008-136]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Extend the Pilot Liquidity Provider Credit on the NYSE Bonds System

December 30, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 22, 2008, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by NYSE. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as one establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by the Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of
the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the
proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to extend the pilot program that issues
liquidity providers a $20 credit for certain bond trades executed on
the NYSE Bonds\SM\ system (``NYSE Bonds'') with an execution size of
less than 20 bonds to December 31, 2009. The Exchange also seeks to
make technical amendments to the fee schedule.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at NYSE, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NYSE included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NYSE has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The New York Stock Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'' or the ``NYSE'')
proposes to extend the pilot program that issues liquidity providers a
$20 credit for certain bond trades executed on the NYSE Bonds\SM\
system (``NYSE Bonds'') with an execution size of less than 20 bonds to
December 31, 2009.
    A liquidity provider is one who posts liquidity to NYSE Bonds.
During the course of clearing their bond trades, liquidity providers
absorb clearing costs. In order to offset these clearing costs,
liquidity providers may increase the offer price or decrease the bid
price of the bond. In doing so, the best execution of a bond order may
be compromised as clearing costs increase with smaller orders.
    Accordingly, the Exchange proposes that liquidity providers
continue to be issued a $20 credit for executions of bond orders with
an execution size of less than 20 bonds through December 31, 2009. In
order for liquidity providers to be eligible to receive this $20
credit, the original and/or residual order posted by the liquidity
provider must be for 20 bonds or more. For example, if a liquidity
provider posts an order for 100 bonds and a contra side order comes in
for 50 bonds, the liquidity provider will not receive a $20 credit.
However, if a contra side order comes in for 10 bonds against the
liquidity provider's current posted order of 100 bonds, the liquidity
provider will receive a credit of $20 from the Exchange for that
execution.
    NYSE Bonds, which was implemented in April 2007, will continue to
update its functionality to provide competitive bond trading for
customers. The Exchange believes that this $20 credit will continue to
incentivize liquidity providers to display the best price available on
NYSE Bonds.
    Additionally, the Exchange seeks to clarify the language in the fee
schedule by replacing the word ``order'' with ``execution.'' The
Exchange is not billing liquidity takers on the orders but rather the
executions of those orders. Accordingly, the Exchange has proposed to
amend the fee schedule to clarify the current language in the fee
schedule.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act \5\ in general and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \6\ in particular, in that
it is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its members and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing rule change establishes or changes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and subparagraph (f)(2)
of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\8\ At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such
rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2008-136 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-136. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of NYSE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2008-136 and should be
submitted on or before January 28, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-3 Filed 1-6-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 12, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 197)]
[Notices]
[Page 60201]
[DOCID:fr12oc06-93]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collections; Comment Request

Upon written request; copies available from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.

Extensions:
    Rule 12d1-3, OMB Control No. 3235-0109, SEC File No. 270-116.
    Schedule 13E-4F, OMB Control No. 3235-0375, SEC File No. 270-
340.
    Form F-X, OMB Control No. 3235-0379, SEC File No. 270-336.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for approval.
    Rule 12d1-3 (17 CFR 240.12d1-3) requires a certification that a
security has been approved by an exchange for listing and registration
pursuant to Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
U.S.C. 78l(d)) to be filed with the Commission. The information
required under Rule 12d1-3 must be filed with the Commission and is
publicly available. We estimate that it takes one-half hour per
response to provide the information required under Rule 12d1-3 and that
the information is filed by 688 respondents for a total annual
reporting burden of 344 hours (.5 hours per response x 688 responses).
    Schedule 13E-4F (17 CFR 240.13e-102) may be used by any foreign
private issuer if: (1) The issuer is incorporated or organized under
the laws of Canada; (2) the issuer is making a cash tender or exchange
offer for the issuer's own securities; and (3) less than 40 percent of
the class of such issuer's securities outstanding that is the subject
of the tender offer is held by U.S. holders. The information collected
must be filed with the Commission and is publicly available. We
estimate that it takes 2 hours per response to prepare Schedule 13E-4F
and that the information is filed by 3 respondents for a total annual
reporting burden of 6 hours (2 hours per response x 3 responses).
    Form F-X (17 CFR 239.42) is used to appoint an agent for service of
process by Canadian issuers registering securities on Form F-7, F-8, F-
9 or F-10 or filing periodic reports on Form 40-F under the Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.). The information collected must be
filed with the Commission and is publicly available. We estimate that
it takes 2 hours per response to prepare Form F-X and that the
information is filed by 129 respondents for a total annual reporting
burden of 258 hours (2 hours per response x 129 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether these proposed
collections of information are necessary for the performance of the
functions of the agency, including whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden imposed by the collections of information; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comment to R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312;
or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: September 28, 2006.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-16849 Filed 10-11-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 94 (Thursday, May 15, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27761-27763]
[FR Doc No: 2014-11087]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0172; FRL-9910-85-Region 9]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan; Ventura
County Air Pollution Control District; Reasonably Available Control
Technology for Ozone

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing
approval of revisions to the Ventura County Air Pollution Control
District (VCAPCD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). This action was proposed in the Federal Register on March 10,
2014 and concerns the District's reasonably available control
technology (RACT) requirements under the 1997 8-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). We are approving this document
under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule will be effective on June 16, 2014.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established docket number EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0172 for
this action. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-
3901. While all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov, some information may be publicly available only at
the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-
volume reports), and some may not be available in either location
(e.g., confidential business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stanley Tong, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4122<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action.

    On March 10, 2014 (79 FR 13266), EPA proposed to approve the
following document into the California SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Local agency                               Document                           Adopted        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VCAPCD.....................  Reasonably Available Control Technology State               9/15/09        11/17/09
                              Implementation Plan Revision (2009 RACT SIP
                              Revision) as adopted September 15, 2009 (``2009
                              RACT SIP'').
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    VCAPCD's submittal also included the following negative
declarations which the District certified that it had no sources
subject to the control techniques guidelines (CTG) documents.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              CTG source category                                       CTG document title
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flat Wood Paneling Coatings....................  EPA-453/R06-004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood
                                                  Paneling Coatings.
Large Appliance Coatings.......................  EPA-453/R-07-004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Large
                                                  Appliance Coatings.
Paper, Film and Foil Coatings..................  EPA-453/R-07-003 Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper, Film,
                                                  and Foil Coatings.
Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly         EPA-452/R-08-006 Control Techniques Guidelines for Automobile
 Coatings.                                        and Light-Duty Truck Assembly Coatings.
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives.............  EPA 453/R-08-005 Control Techniques Guidelines for
                                                  Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives.
Flexible Package Printing......................  EPA 453/R-06-003 Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible
                                                  Package Printing.
Metal Furniture Coatings.......................  EPA 453/R-07-005 Control Techniques Guidelines for Metal
                                                  Furniture Coatings.
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials........  EPA 453/R-08-004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass
                                                  Boat Manufacturing Materials.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve VCAPCD's 2009 RACT SIP including the above
negative declarations because we determined that it complied with the
relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more
information on the submitted document and our evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received no comments.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted. Therefore, as authorized in section
110(k)(3) of the Act, EPA is fully approving this document, including
the negative declarations into the California SIP.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those
requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 14, 2014. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in
proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: April 25, 2014.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS.

0
1. The authority citation for Part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraph (c)(437)to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (437) New and amended regulations for the following APCD was
submitted on November 17, 2009 by the Governor's designee.
    (i) [Reserved]
    (ii) Additional Material
    (A) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Reasonably Available Control Technology State Implementation
Plan Revision (2009 RACT SIP Revision) as adopted on September 15, 2009
(``2009 RACT SIP'').
0
3. Section 52.222 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(10)(i) to read as
follows:

Sec.  52.222  Negative declarations.

* * * * *
    (a) * * *
    (10) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
    (i) EPA-453/R06-004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Flat Wood
Paneling Coatings; EPA-453/R-07-004 Control Techniques Guidelines for
Large Appliance Coatings; EPA-453/R-07-003 Control Techniques
Guidelines for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings; EPA-452/R-08-006 Control
Techniques Guidelines for Automobile and Light-Duty Truck Assembly
Coatings; EPA 453/R-08-005 Control Techniques Guidelines for
Miscellaneous Industrial Adhesives; EPA 453/R-06-003 Control Techniques
Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing; EPA 453/R-07-005 Control
Techniques Guidelines for Metal Furniture Coatings; and EPA 453/R-08-
004 Control Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing
Materials were submitted on November 17, 2009 and adopted on September
15, 2009.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2014-11087 Filed 5-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 16, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 74655-74656]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29283]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2014-0703; FRL-9919-51-Region 9]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Feather
River Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Feather River Air Quality Management District
(FRAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP).
These revisions concern emissions of particulate matter (PM), volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) from
wood heating devices and open burning. We are proposing to approve
local rules to regulate these emission sources under the Clean Air Act
(CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by January 15, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-

OAR-2014-0703, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901.
While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Vineyard, EPA Region IX,
(415) 947-4125<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the following local
rules: (1) FRAQMD Rule 2.0, Open Burning and (2) FRAQMD Rule 3.17, Wood
Heating Devices. In the Rules and Regulations section of this Federal
Register, we are approving these local rules in a direct final action
without prior proposal because we believe these SIP revisions are not
controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will publish
a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the comments
in subsequent action based on this proposed rule. Please note that if
we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: October 16, 2014.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2014-29283 Filed 12-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P