[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 63 (Wednesday, April 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18328-18329]
[FR Doc No: 2020-06789]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. 2020-13]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received; UAVantage,
LLC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief

from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, the FAA's exemption process. Neither publication of
this notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary
is intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before April 21, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2020-0127
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140,
West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590-0001, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jake Troutman,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Office
of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC 20591.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 20, 2020.
Brandon Roberts,
Deputy Executive Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2020-0127.
    Petitioner: UAVantage, LLC.
    Section(s) of 14 CFR Affected: 61.3(a)(1)(i); 91.119(c); 91.121;
91.151(b); 91.405(a); 91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(1) & (2); & 91.417(a) &
(b).
    Description of Relief Sought: The proposed exemption, if granted,
would allow the petitioner to operate the Freefly Systems, Altax X
unmanned aircraft system (UAS), weighing more than 55 pounds (lbs.),
but no more than 70 lbs., for closed-set aerial cinematography
operations for the television and motion picture industry. Operations
would be within visual line of sight of the pilot or visual observer
and will be limited to a maximum altitude of 400 feet above ground
level (AGL) and will normally be flown at altitudes of 25 to 100 feet
AGL or less.

[FR Doc. 2020-06789 Filed 3-31-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


                       2015 Ozone Transport FIP Meeting
Title:	Second Interstate Natural Gas Association of America (INGAA) Stakeholders Meeting
Date/Time: August 10, 2022 (9:00 am-10:00am ET)
Agenda/Meeting Summary:
Meeting attendees reviewed comments regarding the number of units affected by proposed limits, discussed compliance timing with 2026 given potential PSD and FERC permitting time constraints; and discussed timeline for control installation. Further discussions centered on comments on monitoring requirements and system reliability.
Participants/Affiliations:
Name
Affiliation
Scott Yager
INGAA
Mili Patel
INGAA
Barry Goodrich
INGAA
Lisa Beal
INGAA
Brittany Brumley
INGAA
Jim McCarthy
INGAA
Holly Dejong
USEPA OAQPS
Elizabeth Selbst
USEPA OAQPS
Dylan Mataway-Novak
USEPA OAQPS
Robin Langdon
USEPA OAQPS
Matthew Mahler
USEPA OAQPS


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 2, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5830-5831]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02121]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2022-0046]

Information Collection Request to Office of Management and
Budget; OMB Control Number: 1625-0095

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Sixty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
U.S. Coast Guard intends to submit an Information Collection Request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension of
its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0095,
Oil and Hazardous Material Pollution Prevention and Safety Records,
Equivalents/Alternatives and Exemptions; without change. Our ICR
describes the information we seek to collect from the public. Before
submitting this ICR to OIRA, the Coast Guard is inviting comments as
described below.

DATES: Comments must reach the Coast Guard on or before April 4, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number [USCG-2022-0046] to the Coast Guard using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public
participation and request for comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section for further instructions on submitting comments.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available
from: Commandant (CG-6P), Attn: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S.
Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE, Stop 7710, Washington,
DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.L. Craig, Office of Privacy
Management,

telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions on these
documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an
application to OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a
Coast Guard collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains
information describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's
likely burden on the affected public, an explanation of the necessity
of the Collection, and other important information describing the
Collection. There is one ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    In response to your comments, we may revise this ICR or decide not
to seek an extension of approval for the Collection. We will consider
all comments and material received during the comment period.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments must contain the OMB Control Number of
the ICR and the docket number of this request, [USCG-2022-0046], and
must be received by April 4, 2022.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and
submissions in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System
of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020).

Information Collection Request

    Title: Oil and Hazardous Material Pollution Prevention and Safety
Records, Equivalents/Alternatives and Exemptions.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0095.
    Summary: The information is used by the Coast Guard to ensure that
an oil or hazardous material requirement alternative or exemption
provides an equivalent level of safety and protection from pollution.
    Need: Under 33 U.S. Code 1321 and Executive Order 12777 the Coast
Guard is authorized to prescribe regulations to prevent the discharge
of oil and hazardous substances from vessels and facilities and to
contain such discharges. Coast Guard regulations in 33 CFR parts 154-
156 are intended to: (1) Prevent or mitigate the results of an
accidental release of bulk liquid hazardous materials being transferred
at waterfront facilities; (2) ensure that facilities and vessels that
use vapor control systems are in compliance with the safety standards
developed by the Coast Guard; (3) provide equipment and operational
requirements for facilities and vessels that transfer oil or hazardous
materials in bulk to or from vessels with a 250 or more barrel
capacity; and (4) provide procedures for vessel or facility operators
who request exemption or partial exemption from the requirements of the
pollution prevention regulations.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Owners and operators of bulk oil and hazardous
materials facilities and vessels.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden remains 1,720 hours a
year.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter
35, as amended.

    Dated: January 27, 2022.
Kathleen Claffie,
Chief, Office of Privacy Management, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2022-02121 Filed 2-1-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86590-86591]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28894]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90796; File No. SR-BX-2020-032]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq BX, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Options 4, Section 5, To Limit Short Term Options
Series Intervals Between Strikes Which Are Available for Quoting and
Trading on BX

December 23, 2020.
    On November 6, 2020, Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend
Options 4, Section 5, ``Series of Options Contracts Open for Trading''
to seek to limit Short Term Options Series intervals between strikes
which are available for quoting and trading on BX. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on November
16, 2020.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90384 (November 9,
2020), 85 FR 73113 (November 16, 2020). Comments on the proposed
rule change can be found at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-bx-2020-032/srbx2020032.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the

self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission shall either
approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change,
or institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved. The 45th day after publication of the notice for
this proposed rule change is December 31, 2020. The Commission is
extending this 45-day time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ designates
February 14, 2021, as the date by which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-BX-2020-032).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.
    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-28894 Filed 12-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2291-2293]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00532]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2015-0372]

Notice of Availability of a Draft Environmental Assessment for
the City of El Paso, Texas, Commercial Zone Expansion

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces the availability of a draft Environmental
Assessment (EA) prepared for the expansion of the City of El Paso,
Texas, commercial zone. The EA was prepared in compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA); the Council on
Environmental Quality Regulations; and FMCSA NEPA Order 5610.1 (NEPA
Implementing Procedures and Policy for Considering Environmental
Impacts). Interested persons are invited to comment on the draft EA.

DATES: Comments on the draft environmental assessment must be received
on or before January 28, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System Docket ID [FMCSA-2015-0372] using any of the
following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
    Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 0590-0001.
    Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
ET, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Each submission must include the Agency name and the docket number
for this notice. Note that DOT posts all comments received without
change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
included in a comment. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The online Federal document management system
is available 24 hours each day, 365 days each year. If you want
acknowledgment that we received your comments, please include a self-
addressed, stamped envelope or postcard or print the acknowledgement
page that appears after submitting comments online.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Andrea Pahlevanpour, Environmental
Program Analyst, Regulatory Evaluation Division, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001, Telephone number: 202-366-
5370<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, contact Docket Services, telephone
(202) 366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The County of El Paso submitted a Presidential Permit application
on April 14, 2003, to the U.S. Department of State for replacement of
the Fabens-Caseta International Bridge (Fabens, Texas connecting
Caseta, Chihuahua, Mexico) and port of entry. The Department of State,
under its authority under Executive Order 11423, ``Delegation of
Functions to Secretary of State Respecting Certain Facilities
Constructed and Maintained on United States Borders,'' 33 FR 11741
(Aug. 16, 1968), for the construction, maintenance, and operation of
U.S.-Mexico cross-border facilities, issued the Presidential Permit on
March 16, 2005.
    Presidential Permit 05-01 is titled ``Authorizing the County of El
Paso, Texas, to Construct, Operate, and Maintain an International
Bridge, Its Approaches and Facilities, at the International Boundary
Between the United States and Mexico.'' This permit granted permission,
subject to the conditions of the permit, to the County of El Paso,
Texas, to construct, operate and maintain an international bridge. The
permit noted that the name of the bridge was proposed as the
``Tornillo-Guadalupe New International Bridge.'' The bridge was to be
constructed, ``approximately 1,950 feet upstream'' from the existing
Fabens-Caseta International Bridge. The permit specified that, ``[T]he
proposed Tornillo International Bridge will facilitate passenger
vehicles, commercial trucks, and pedestrian traffic.'' In June 2011,
the General Services Administration (GSA) announced the kick-off of
construction of the new port facility, including a six-lane replacement
bridge.
    Construction is complete on the United States' side of the
crossing, and non-commercial passenger-vehicle crossings are ongoing at
this location. Northbound traffic is using the existing bridge, built
in 1938 that is to be destroyed and replaced along with the port-of-
entry facilities, with the traffic detoured to the new Tornillo
inspection facilities. The construction of facilities, interchanges,
and roads on the Mexican side of the border has been delayed but is
expected to be completed in the near future.
    The commercial zone of the City of El Paso, Texas (which had a
population of 649,121 as of the 2010 census) is currently defined by
the general provisions of 49 CFR Sections 372.239, 372.241 and 372.243.
It includes the municipality of the City of El Paso, all municipalities
contiguous to the City of El Paso, and all other municipalities and all
unincorporated areas that are adjacent to the City of El Paso. It also
includes ``when the base municipality has a population of 500,000 but
less than 1 million, all unincorporated areas within 15 miles of its
corporate limits and all of any other municipality any part of which is
within 15 miles of the corporate limits of the base municipality.'' 49
CFR 372.241(c)(6). The unincorporated community of Tornillo, Texas, as
well as the area near the location of the new Port of Entry, are more
than 15 miles from the closest municipal boundary of the City of El
Paso. Therefore, these areas are not included as part of the current
City of El Paso, Texas commercial zone.
    FMCSA will expand the City of El Paso, TX, commercial zone to
include all unincorporated areas within 15 miles of the corporate
boundaries of the City of San Elizario, TX. The City of San Elizario
(located southeast of the City of El Paso) was incorporated on November
18, 2013 under the general laws of Texas and is thus included within
the present commercial zone of the City of El Paso because it is within
15 miles of the boundary of the City of El Paso. By expanding the
commercial zone to include those unincorporated areas within 15 miles
of the boundaries of San Elizario, the new Tornillo-Guadalupe POE and
the roads and highways providing access to the POE will be within the
commercial zone of the City of El Paso, TX. Most motor carriers
operating entirely in a border commercial zone such as at El Paso are
not required to obtain operating authority to perform such
transportation. But under 49 U.S.C. 13902(c) and 49 CFR part 368,
Mexico-domiciled motor carriers of property must obtain a certificate
of registration to operate in border commercial zones. Allowing all of
these carriers to continue their operations at El Paso

necessitates ensuring that the new bridge and port of entry are in a
commercial zone.

Environment

    NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.) requires Federal agencies to
integrate environmental values into their decision-making processes by
requiring Federal agencies to consider the potential environmental
impacts of their proposed actions. In accordance with NEPA, the Council
on Environmental Quality's regulations implementing NEPA (40 CFR parts
1500-1508), FMCSA's NEPA Order 5610.1, NEPA Implementing Procedures and
Policy for Considering Environmental Impacts, and other applicable
requirements (March 1, 2004 (69 FR 9680)), FMCSA has prepared a draft
EA to review the potential impacts of the expansion of the El Paso
commercial zone. FMCSA concludes that the action of expanding the
existing commercial zone will not impact endangered species, cultural
resources protected under the National Historic Preservation Act,
wetlands, and resources protected under Section 4(f) of the DOT Act of
1966 49 U.S.C. 303, as amended by Public Law 109-59 (Aug. 10, 2005).
The impact areas that may be affected and were evaluated in the Draft
EA include air quality, noise, socioeconomics, environmental justice,
land use public health and safety, and hazardous materials. FMCSA
anticipates that expanding the El Paso commercial zone will have
certain minor impacts related principally to air emissions and land use
from economic growth; however, neither of these impacts individually or
collectively will cause significant impacts. In addition, the economic
impact will have potentially beneficial impacts on the quality of life
in terms of job creation. The Draft EA is available for inspection or
copying in the Regulations.gov Web site at http://www.regulations.gov.
    The draft EA also provides an analysis under the Clean Air Act, as
amended (CAA), section 176(c) (42 U.S.C. 42 U.S.C. 7506(c)), and
implementing regulations promulgated by the Environmental Protection
Agency. None of the alternatives considered in the Draft EA are located
in a nonattainment or maintenance area for any of the criteria
pollutants; therefore, FMCSA has determined that it is not required to
perform the CAA general conformity analysis.
    Subject to public notice and comment, FMCSA anticipates issuing a
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) related to this action.
    Issued pursuant to authority delegated in 49 CFR 1.87 on:

    Issued on: January 7, 2016.
T.F. Scott Darling, III,
Acting Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2016-00532 Filed 1-14-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register: November 15, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 219)]
[Notices]
[Page 69328]
[DOCID:fr15no05-38]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER05-1358-002]

KGen Hinds LLC; Notice of Filing

November 8, 2005.
    Take notice that on October 31, 2005, KGen Hinds LLC (Hinds), under
protest, tendered for filing a Conditional Notice of Cancellation of
its Rate Schedule FERC No. 1.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: CP06-14-000 on November 21, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-6284 Filed 11-14-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 6 (Wednesday, January 9, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1750-1751]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00286]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1444; Airspace Docket No. 11-ASO-46]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Princeton, KY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E Airspace at Princeton, KY, to
accommodate the new Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System
(GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures serving Princeton-
Caldwell County Airport. This action enhances the safety and airspace
management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations within the
National Airspace System. This action also makes a minor adjustment to
the geographic coordinates of the airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, March 7, 2013. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under title 1,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, P.O.
Box 20636, Atlanta, Georgia 30320; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On October 24, 2012, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice of proposed rulemaking to establish Class E airspace at
Princeton, KY (77 FR 64919) Docket No. FAA-2011-1444. Subsequent to
publication,

the FAA found a typographical error in the longitude coordinates. This
action makes the correction. Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on
the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received. Class E airspace
designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9W dated
August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 2012, which is incorporated
by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed
in this document will be published subsequently in the Order. With the
exception of editorial changes, and the changes described above, this
rule is the same as that proposed in the NPRM.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 establishes the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface at Princeton, KY, to provide the controlled airspace
required to accommodate the new RNAV GPS Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures developed for Princeton-Caldwell County Airport. This action
is necessary for the safety and management of IFR operations at the
airport. Also, the longitude coordinates of the airport are corrected
from `long. 87[deg] 51'10''25'' W to `long. 87[deg]51'25'' W.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes controlled airspace at Princeton-Caldwell County
Airport, Princeton, KY.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 311a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9W, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated August 8, 2012, effective September 15, 2012, is amended
as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward from 700
feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO KY E5 Princeton, KY [New]

Princeton-Caldwell County Airport
    (Lat. 37[deg]6'54'' N., long. 87[deg]51'25'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.7-mile radius of the Princeton-Caldwell County Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on December 12, 2012.
Barry A. Knight,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2013-00286 Filed 1-7-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 77 (Monday, April 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18915-18916]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08181]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2016-N-2976]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Information From
United States Firms and Processors That Export to the European Union

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing
that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by May 24,
2017.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0320.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ila S. Mizrachi, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, Three White Flint North, 10A63, 11601
Landsdown St., North Bethesda, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Information From U.S. Firms and Processors That Export to the EU OMB
Control Number 0910-0320--Extension

    The European Union (EU) is a group of 28 European countries that
have agreed to harmonize their commodity requirements to facilitate
commerce among member States. For certain food products, including
those listed in this document, EU legislation requires assurances from
the responsible authority of the country of origin that the processor
of the food is in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements.
Regulation (EC) No. 854/2004 of the European Parliament and of the
European Council states that products of animal origin may only be
imported from establishments that appear on a list of establishments
for which the competent authority of the exporting country has
guaranteed compliance with applicable regulatory requirements and that
shipments of these products must be accompanied by documents that
certify the products' compliance with applicable regulatory standards.
Section 801(e) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C.
381(e)) authorizes FDA to provide the certification described in
Regulation (EC) No. 854/2004. As stated in the notice published in the
Federal Register of April 4, 1996 (61 FR 15077), we established a list
of U.S. firms and processors eligible to export shell eggs, dairy
products, and game meat and game meat products to the EU. In response
to changing EU requirements, we revised this information collection and
lists of eligible exporters in order to facilitate U.S. exports of
gelatin and collagen to the EU. In 2001, we revised this collection to
include firms and processors intending to export gelatin products to
the EU (66 FR 12802, February 28, 2001) and in 2010, we revised the
collection again to include firms and processors intending to export
collagen products to the EU (75 FR 51077, August 18, 2010).
    We request the following information from each firm or processor
seeking to be included on the lists of eligible exporters for shell
eggs, and game meat and game meat products (dairy products will be
covered under OMB control number 0910-0509):
     Business name and address;
     name and telephone number of person designated as business
contact;
     lists of products presently being shipped to the EU and
those intended to be shipped in the next 6 months;
     name and address of manufacturing plants for each product;
and
     names and affiliations of any Federal, State, or local
governmental Agencies that inspect the plant, government-assigned plant
identifier such as plant number, and last date of inspection.
    We request the following information from each firm or processor
seeking to be included on the list of eligible exporters for gelatin
and collagen products:
     Food Facility Registration Number and Pin Number (if
applicable);
     business name and address;
     name, telephone number, fax number, and email address of
main business contact person;
     list of products presently shipped to the EU and those
intended to be shipped within the next 2 years;
     name and address of the manufacturing and processing plant
for each product (manufacturer type for primary producer);
     names and affiliations of any Federal, State, and local
governmental Agencies that inspect the plant, government assigned plant
identifier such as plant number and last date of inspection; and
     a copy of the most recent (within 1 year of the date of
application) inspection report issued by a State, local, or Federal
public health regulatory Agency and a copy of a recent laboratory
analysis as required by the EU of the finished product including: Total
aerobic bacteria, coliforms (30 degrees C), coliforms (44.5 degrees C),
anaerobic sulphite-reducing bacteria (no gas production), Clostridium
perfringens, Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella, arsenic, lead, cadmium,
mercury, chromium, copper, zinc, moisture (105 degrees C), ash (550
degrees C), sulfur dioxide, and hydrogen peroxide.
    We use the information to maintain lists of firms and processors
that have demonstrated current compliance with U.S. requirements. We
make the lists available on our Web site. We include on the lists only
firms and processors that are not the subject of an unresolved
regulatory enforcement action or unresolved warning letter. If a listed
firm or processor subsequently becomes the subject of a regulatory
enforcement action or an unresolved warning letter, we will view such a
circumstance as evidence that the firm or processor is no longer in
compliance with applicable U.S. laws and regulations. Should this
occur, we will take steps to remove that firm or processor from the
list and send a revised list to the EU authorities, usually within 48
to 72 hours after the relevant regulatory enforcement action. If a firm
or processor has been delisted as a result of a regulatory enforcement
action or unresolved warning letter, the firm or processor will have to
reapply for inclusion on the list once the regulatory action has been
resolved.
    We update quarterly the lists of firms and processors eligible to
export products of animal origin to the EU. Firms and processors placed
on lists of eligible exporters are subject to audit by FDA and EU
officials. Complete requests for inclusion on the lists of eligible
exporters, which is voluntary, must be submitted 12 months to remain on
the list of firms and processors eligible to export products of animal
origin to the EU. However, products of

animal origin from firms or processors not on lists of eligible
exporters for these products are not eligible for export certificates
for these products, and these products may be detained at EU ports of
entry.
    Description of Respondents: The respondents to this collection of
information include U.S. producers of shell eggs, game meat and game
meat products, gelatin, and collagen.
    In the Federal Register of October 4, 2016 (81 FR 68424), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. FDA received one comment which was not PRA-
related, and therefore is not addressed in this supporting statement.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                  Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                   Number of
           Products                Number of     responses per   Total annual    Average burden     Total hours
                                  respondents     respondent       responses      per response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Shell Eggs....................              10               1              10  .25 (15 minutes)               3
Game Meat and Game Meat                      5               1               5  .25 (15 minutes)               1
 Products.
Gelatin.......................               7               1               7  .25 (15 minutes)               2
Collagen......................              18               1              18  .25 (15 minutes)               5
                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.....................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ................              11
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    We base our estimates of the number of respondents and total annual
responses on the submissions that we have received in the past 3 years
for each product type. To calculate the estimate for the hours per
response values, we assumed that the information requested is readily
available to the submitter. We expect that the submitter will need to
gather information from appropriate persons in the submitter's company
and to prepare this information for submission. We believe that this
effort should take no longer than 15 minutes (0.25 hour) per response.
We estimate that we will receive 1 submission from 10 shell egg
producers annually, for a total of 10 annual responses. Each submission
is estimated to take 0.25 hour per response for a total of 2.5 hours,
rounded to 3 hours. This collection has previously covered information
collected to maintain lists of eligible exporters of dairy products;
dairy products will be covered under OMB control number 0910-0509, so
the estimated burden has been removed from this collection. We estimate
that we will receive one submission from five game meat and game meat
product producers annually, for a total of five annual responses. Each
submission is estimated to take 0.25 hour per response for a total of
1.25 hours, rounded to 1 hour. We estimate that we will receive one
submission from seven gelatin producers annually, for a total of seven
annual responses. Each submission is estimated to take 0.25 hour per
response for a total of 1.75 hours, rounded to 2 hours. We estimate
that we will receive 1 submission from 18 collagen producers annually,
for a total of 18 annual responses. Each submission is estimated to
take 0.25 hour per response for a total of 4.5 hours, rounded to 5
hours. The estimated burden for collagen producers includes animal
casings, which have been listed separately in previous notices.
Therefore, the proposed annual burden for this information collection
is 11 hours.

    Dated: April 17, 2017.
Anna K. Abram,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-08181 Filed 4-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P