[Federal Register: February 18, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 32)]
[Notices]
[Page 7304]
[DOCID:fr18fe10-73]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activity Seeking OMB Approval

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA invites public comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) revision of a current
information collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day
comment period soliciting comments on the following collection of
information was published on October 16, 2009, vol. 74, no. 199, page
53316. FAR Part 157 requires that each person who intends to construct,
deactivate, or change the status of an airport, runway, or taxiway must
notify the FAA of such activity.

DATES: Please submit comments by March 22, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Mauney at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Notice of Landing Area Proposal.
    Type of Request: Extension without change of a currently approved
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0036.
    Forms(s) Form 7480-1.
    Affected Public: An estimated 1,500 Respondents.
    Frequency: This information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: Approximately 45 minutes per
response.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 1,125 hours annually.
    Abstract: FAR Part 157 requires that anyone who intends to
construct, deactivate, or change the status of an airport, runway, or
taxiway must notify the FAA. The information collected provides the
basis for determining the effect the proposed action would have on
existing airports and on the safe and efficient use of airspace by
aircraft, on existing or contemplated traffic patterns of neighboring
airports, on the existing airspace structure and projected programs of
the FAA, and the effects that existing or proposed manmade objects (on
file with the FAA) and natural objects within the affected area would
have on the airport proposal.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of
Transportation/FAA, and sent via electronic mail to oira_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to the
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington,
DC 20503.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 4, 2010.
Carla Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2010-3157 Filed 2-17-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 24 (Wednesday, February 5, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6636-6639]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02191]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-88091; File No. SR-BOX-2020-02]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BOX Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange
Rule 10070, Anti-Money Laundering Compliance Program, To Reflect the
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network's Adoption of a Final Rule on
Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions

January 30, 2020.

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 16, 2020, BOX Exchange LLC (the ``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Exchange files
the proposed rule change as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) \3\ of the Act and Rule
19b-4(f)(6) \4\ thereunder. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4. The Exchange provided the Commission with
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing the proposed
rule change as required by Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii). 17 CFR 240.19b-
4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend BOX Rule 10070 (Anti-Money
Laundering Compliance Program) to reflect the Financial Crimes
Enforcement Network's (``FinCEN'') adoption of a final rule on Customer
Due Diligence Requirements for Financial Institutions (``CDD Rule'').
The text of the proposed rule change is available from the principal
office of the Exchange, at the Commission's Public Reference Room and
also on the Exchange's internet website at http://boxoptions.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
I. Background
    The Bank Secrecy Act \5\ (``BSA''), among other things, requires
financial institutions,\6\ including broker-dealers, to develop and
implement AML programs that, at a minimum, meet the statutorily
enumerated ``four pillars.'' \7\ These four pillars currently require
broker-dealers to have written AML programs that include, at a minimum:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 31 U.S.C. 5311, et seq.
    \6\ See U.S.C. 5312(a)(2) (defining ``financial institution'').
    \7\ 31 U.S.C. 5318(h)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The establishment and implementation of policies,
procedures and internal controls reasonably designed to achieve
compliance with the applicable provisions of the BSA and implementing
regulations;
     Independent testing for compliance by broker-dealer
personnel or a qualified outside party;
     Designation of an individual or individuals responsible
for implementing and monitoring the operations and internal controls of
the AML program; and
     Ongoing training for appropriate persons.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 31 CFR 1023.210(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to meeting the BSA's requirements with respect to AML
programs, Participants must also comply with Exchange Rule 10070, which
incorporates the BSA's four pillars, as well as requires Participants'
AML programs to establish and implement policies and procedures that
can be reasonably expected to detect and cause the reporting of
suspicious transactions.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ BOX Rule 10070(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 11, 2016, FinCEN, the bureau of the Department of the
Treasury

responsible for administering the BSA and its implementing regulations,
issued the CDD Rule \10\ to clarify and strengthen customer due
diligence for covered financial institutions,\11\ including broker-
dealers. In its CDD Rule, FinCEN identifies four components of customer
due diligence: (1) Customer identification and verification; (2)
beneficial ownership identification and verification; (3) understanding
the nature and purpose of customer relationships; and (4) ongoing
monitoring for reporting suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis,
maintaining and updating customer information.\12\ As the first
component is already required to be part of a broker-dealers AML
program under the BSA, the CDD Rule focuses on the other three
components.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ FinCEN Customer Due Diligence Requirements for Financial
Institutions; CDD Rule, 81 FR 29397 (May 11, 2016) (CDD Rule
Release); 82 FR 45182 (September 28, 2017) (making technical
correcting amendments to the final CDD Rule published on May
11,2016). FinCEN is authorized to impose AML program requirements on
financial institutions and to require financial institutions to
maintain procedures to ensure compliance with the BSA and associated
regulations. 31 U.S.C. 5318(h)(2) and (a)(2).The CDD Rule is the
result of the rulemaking process FinCEN initiated in March 2012.See
77 FR 13046 (March 5, 2012) (Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking)
and 79 FR 45151 (Aug. 4, 2014) (Notice of Proposed Rulemaking).
    \11\ See 31 CFR 1010.230(f) (defining ``covered financial
institution'').
    \12\ See CDD Rule Release at 29398.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the CDD Rule focuses particularly on the second
component by adding a new requirement that covered financial
institutions identify and verify the identity of the beneficial owners
of all legal entity customers at the time a new account is opened,
subject to certain exclusions and exemptions.\13\ The CDD Rule also
addresses the third and fourth components, which FinCEN states ``are
already implicitly required for covered financial institutions to
comply with their suspicious activity reporting requirements,'' by
amending the existing AML program rules for covered financial
institutions to explicitly require these components to be included in
AML programs as a new ``fifth pillar.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See 31 CFR 1010.230(d) (defining ``beneficial owner'') and
31 CFR 1010.230(e) (defining ``legal entity customer'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 21, 2017, FINRA published Regulatory Notice 17-40 to
provide guidance to member firms regarding their obligations under
FINRA Rule 3310 in light of the adoption of FinCEN's CDD Rule. In
addition, the Notice summarized the CDD Rule's impact on member firms,
including the addition of the new fifth pillar required for member
firms' AML programs. FINRA also amended FINRA Rule 3310 to explicitly
incorporate the fifth pillar.\14\ This proposed rule change amends BOX
Rule 10070 to harmonize it with the FINRA rule and incorporate the
fifth pillar.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83154 (May 2,
2018), 83 FR 20906 (May 8, 2018) (File No. SR-FINRA-2018-016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Exchange Rule 10070 and Amendment to Minimum Requirements for
Participants' AML Programs
    Section 352 of the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001 \15\ amended the BSA to
require broker-dealers to develop and implement AML programs that
include the four pillars mentioned above. Consistent with Section 352
of the PATRIOT Act, and incorporating the four pillars, Exchange Rule
10070 requires each Participant to develop and implement a written AML
program reasonably designed to achieve and monitor the Participant's
compliance with the BSA and implementing regulations. Among other
requirements, Exchange Rule 10070 requires that each Participant, at a
minimum: (1) Establish and implement policies and procedures that can
be reasonably expected to detect and cause the reporting of suspicious
transactions; (2) establish and implement policies and internal
controls reasonably designed to achieve compliance with the BSA and
implementing regulations; (3) provide independent testing for
compliance to be conducted by Participant personnel or a qualified
outside party; (4) designate and identify to the Exchange a person or
persons (i.e., AML compliance person(s)) who will be responsible for
implementing and monitoring the day-to-day operations and internal
controls of the AML program and provide prompt notification to the
Exchange of any changes to the designation; and (5) provide ongoing
training for appropriate persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate
Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001,
Public Law 107-56, 115 Stat. 272 (2001).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FinCEN's CDD Rule does not change the requirements of Exchange Rule
10070, and Participants must continue to comply with its
requirements.\16\ However, FinCEN's CDD Rule amends the minimum
regulatory requirements for broker-dealers' AML programs by explicitly
requiring such programs to include risk-based procedures for conducting
ongoing customer due diligence.\17\ Accordingly, the Exchange is
proposing to amend Exchange Rule 10070 to incorporate this ongoing
customer due diligence element, or ``fifth pillar'' required for AML
programs. Thus, proposed Rule 10070(a)(6) would provide that the AML
programs required by this Rule shall, at a minimum include appropriate
risk-based procedures for conducting ongoing customer due diligence, to
include, but not be limited to: (1) Understanding the nature and
purpose of customer relationships for the purpose of developing a
customer risk profile; and (2) conducting ongoing monitoring to
identify and report suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis, to
maintain and update customer information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ FinCEN notes that broker-dealers must continue to comply
with FINRA Rules, notwithstanding differences between the CDD Rule
and FINRA Rule 3310, which is substantially identical to Exchange
Rule 10070. See CDD Rule Release 29421, n. 85.
    \17\ See CDD Rule Release at 29420; 31 CFR 1023.210.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated in the CDD Rule, these provisions are not new and merely
codify existing expectations for Participants to adequately identify
and report suspicious transactions as required under the BSA and
encapsulate practices generally already undertaken by securities firms
to know and understand their customers.\18\ The proposed rule change
simply incorporates into Exchange Rule 10070 the ongoing customer due
diligence element, or ``fifth pillar,'' required for AML programs by
the CDD Rule to aid Participants in complying with the CDD Rule's
requirements. However, to the extent that these elements, which are
briefly summarized below, are not already included in Participants' AML
programs, the CDD Rule requires Participants to update their AML
programs to explicitly incorporate them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Id. at 29419.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Summary of Fifth Pillar's Requirements
Understanding the Nature and Purpose of Customer Relationships
    FinCEN states in the CDD Rule that firms must necessarily have an
understanding of the nature and purpose of the customer relationship in
order to determine whether a transaction is potentially suspicious and,
in turn, to fulfill their SAR obligations.\19\ To that end, the CDD
Rule requires that firms understand the nature and purpose of the
customer relationship in order to develop a customer risk profile. The
customer risk profile refers to information gathered about a customer
to form the baseline against which customer activity is

assessed for suspicious transaction reporting.\20\ Information relevant
to understanding the nature and purpose of the customer relationship
may be self-evident and, depending on the facts and circumstances, may
include such information as the type of customer, account or service
offered, and the customer's income, net worth, domicile, or principal
occupation or business, as well as, in the case of existing customers,
the customer's history of activity.\21\ The CDD Rule also does not
prescribe a particular form of the customer risk profile.\22\ Instead,
the CDD Rule states that depending on the firm and the nature of its
business, a customer risk profile may consist of individualized risk
scoring, placement of customers into risk categories or another means
of assessing customer risk that allows firms to understand the risk
posed by the customer and to demonstrate that understanding.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Id. at 29421.
    \20\ Id. at 29422.
    \21\ Id.
    \22\ Id.
    \23\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The CDD Rule also addresses the interplay of understanding the
nature and purpose of customer relationships with the ongoing
monitoring obligation discussed below. The CDD Rule explains that firms
are not necessarily required or expected to integrate customer
information or the customer risk profile into existing transaction
monitoring systems (for example, to serve as the baseline for
identifying and assessing suspicious transactions on a contemporaneous
basis).\24\ Rather, FinCEN expects firms to use the customer
information and customer risk profile as appropriate during the course
of complying with their obligations under the BSA in order to determine
whether a particular flagged transaction is suspicious.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ Id.
    \25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conduct Ongoing Monitoring
    As with the requirement to understand the nature and purpose of the
customer relationship, the requirement to conduct ongoing monitoring to
identify and report suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis, to
maintain and update customer information, merely adopts existing
supervisory and regulatory expectations as explicit minimum standards
of customer due diligence required for firms' AML programs.\26\ If, in
the course of its normal monitoring for suspicious activity, the
Participant detects information that is relevant to assessing the
customer's risk profile, the Participant must update the customer
information, including the information regarding the beneficial owners
of legal entity customers.\27\ However, there is no expectation that
the Participant update customer information, including beneficial
ownership information, on an ongoing or continuous basis.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ Id. at 29402.
    \27\ Id. at 29420-21. See also FINRA Regulatory Notice 17-40
(discussing identifying and verifying the identity of beneficial
owners of legal entity customers).
    \28\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\29\ in general, and Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\30\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a
free and open market and a national market system, and, in general to
protect investors and the public interest because it will aid
Participants in complying with the CDD Rule's requirement that
Participants' AML programs include risk-based procedures for conducting
ongoing customer due diligence by also incorporating the requirement
into Exchange Rule 10070.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change simply
incorporates into Exchange Rule 10070 the ongoing customer due
diligence element, or ``fifth pillar,'' required for AML programs by
the CDD Rule. Regardless of the proposed rule change, to the extent
that the elements of the fifth pillar are not already included in
Participants' AML programs, the CDD Rule requires Participants to
update their AML programs to explicitly incorporate them. In addition,
as stated in the CDD Rule, these elements are already implicitly
required for covered financial institutions to comply with their
suspicious activity reporting requirements. Further, all Exchange
Participants that have customers are required to be members of FINRA
pursuant to Rule 15b9-1 under the Exchange Act,\31\ and are therefore
already subject to the requirements of FINRA Rule 3310. Additionally,
the proposed rule change is virtually identical \32\ to FINRA Rule
3310. The Exchange is not imposing any additional direct or indirect
burdens on Participants or their customers through this proposal, and
as such, the proposal imposes no new burdens on competition.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 17 CFR 240.15b9-1.
    \32\ The Exchange notes that changes between the proposed Rule
and FINRA Rule 3310 are non-substantive and relate to cross
references.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \33\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) \34\ thereunder, the Exchange has designated this proposal as
one that effects a change that: (i) Does not significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) does not impose
any significant burden on competition; and (iii) by its terms, does not
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \33\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \34\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BOX-2020-02 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2020-02. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, on business days between the
hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., located at 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change.
    Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or
edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BOX-2020-02
and should be submitted on or before February 26, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \35\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-02191 Filed 2-4-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 6, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13193-13194]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4494]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1230; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-141-AD;
Amendment 39-16964; AD 2012-04-08]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Model DHC-8-102, -103, and -106 airplanes and Model DHC-8-200, -300,
and -400 series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracking
of the DHC-8 Series 100 rudder actuator mounting bracket. This AD
requires modifying the mounting adapters of the power control unit
(PCU). We are issuing this AD to prevent loss of both rudder PCU
actuators which could result in free play of the rudder control surface
and loss of controllability of the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective April 10, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 10,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cesar Gomez, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on November 18, 2011
(76 FR 71470). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for
the specified products. The MCAI states:

    Several reports have been received regarding cracking of the
DHC-8 Series 100 rudder actuator mounting bracket. An investigation
revealed that the mounting bracket has been under-designed based on
the static and endurance loading conditions. The failure of the
mounting brackets that attach the power control unit (PCU) to the
airframe could result in a loss of the rudder actuating system. The
loss of both rudder PCU actuators could result in free play of the
rudder control surface and potentially induce a flutter condition.
    This [TCCA] directive mandates the installation of a new design
of rudder actuator mounting bracket [adapter].

    The unsafe condition is loss of controllability of the airplane.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received. The commenter supports the
NPRM (76 FR 71470, November 18, 2011).

Explanation of Change Made to This AD

    We have revised the heading for and the wording in paragraph (h) of
this AD; this change has not changed the intent of that paragraph.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the change described previously and minor editorial changes. We
have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (76 FR 71470, November 18, 2011) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (76 FR 71470, November 18, 2011).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 171 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take up to 10 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost up to $2,856
per product. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on
U.S. operators to be up to $633,726, or $3,706 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (76 FR 71470, November 18,
2011), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-04-08 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16964. Docket No. FAA-
2011-1230; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-141-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective April 10,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. airplanes identified in
paragraphs (c)(1) and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any
category.
    (1) Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, and -
315 airplanes, serial numbers 003 through 672 inclusive.
    (2) Model DHC-8-400, -401, and -402 airplanes, serial numbers
4001 through 4343 inclusive.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27: Flight
controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracking of the DHC-8 Series
100 rudder actuator mounting bracket. We are issuing this AD to
prevent loss of both rudder PCU actuators which could result in free
play of the rudder control surface and loss of controllability of
the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Free-Play Check and Corrective Actions

    Within 6,000 flight hours or 3 years after the effective date of
this AD, whichever occurs first, do the actions required by
paragraph (g)(1) or (g)(2) of this AD, as applicable.
    (1) For Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -201, -202, -301, -311, and
-315 airplanes: Install a new CRES mounting adapter with new bolts
by incorporating MODSUM 8Q101890, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-110,
Revision C, dated May 13, 2011.
    (2) For DHC-8-400, -401, and -402 airplanes: Replace the
existing upper and lower mounting adapters of the PCU with
redesigned adapters by incorporating MODSUM 4-113655, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin
84-27-53, dated November 26, 2010.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g)(1) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-
110, Revision A, dated December 3, 2010; or Bombardier Service
Bulletin 8-27-110, Revision B, dated January 31, 2011.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational Safety,
FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(j) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2011-12, dated
June 6, 2011; Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-110, Revision C,
dated May 13, 2011; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-53, dated
November 26, 2010; for related information.

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) You must use the following service information to do the
actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference (IBR) of the following service information under 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51:
    (i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-27-110, Revision C, dated May
13, 2011.
    (ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-27-53, dated November 26,
2010.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
http://www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at an NARA facility, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 17, 2012.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-4494 Filed 3-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Diclofop-methyl (110902)

Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)

Date: March 14, 2014

What is a Screening Level Usage Analysis (SLUA)?

Available estimates of pesticide usage data for a particular active
ingredient that is used on agricultural crops in the United States.

Pesticide usage data obtained from various sources.  The data are then
merged, averaged, and rounded so that the presented information is not
proprietary, business confidential, or trade secret.

What does it contain?

Pesticide usage data for a single active ingredient only.

Agricultural use sites (crops) that the pesticide is reported to be used
on.

Available pesticide usage information from U.S. states that produce 80%
or more of a crop, in most cases, or less than 80%, in rare cases,
depending on the scope of the survey and available resources.

Annual percent of crop treated (average & maximum) for each agricultural
crop.

Average annual pounds of the pesticide applied for each agricultural
crop (i.e., for the states surveyed, not for the entire United States).

What assumptions can I make about the reported data?

Average pounds of active ingredient applied - Values are calculated by
merging pesticide usage data sources together; averaging across all
observations, then rounding.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than
500, then that value is labeled <500.  Estimated values between 500 &
<1,000,000 are rounded to 1 significant digit.  Estimated values of
1,000,000 or greater are rounded to 2 significant digits.)

Average percent of crop treated - Values are calculated by merging data
sources together; averaging by year, averaging across all years, &
rounding to the nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is
less than 2.5, then the value is labeled <2.5.  If the estimated value
is less than 1, then the value is labeled <1.

Maximum percent of crop treated - Value is the single maximum value
reported across all data sources, across all years, & rounded up to the
nearest multiple of 5.  Note:  If the estimated value is less than 2.5,
then the value is labeled <2.5.

What are the data sources used?

USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture’s National
Agricultural Statistics Service) – pesticide usage data from 2004 to
2012.

Private pesticide market research – pesticide usage data from 2004 to
2012.

California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) Pesticide Use
Reporting (PUR) data for 2004 to 2011.

What are the limitations to the data?

Additional registered uses may exist but are not included because the
available surveys do not report usage (e.g., small acreage crops).

Lack of reported usage data for the pesticide on a crop does not imply
zero usage.

Usage data on a particular site may be noted in data sources, but not
quantified.  In these instances, the site would not be reported in the
SLUA.

Non-agricultural use sites (e.g., turf, post-harvest, mosquito control,
etc.) are not reported in the SLUA.  A separate request must be made to
receive these estimates.

Some sites show some use, even though they are not on the label.  This
usage could be due to various factors, including, but not limited to
Section 18 requests, existing stocks of the chemical, data collection
errors, and experimental use permits (EUPs).

Date: March 14, 2014

Screening Level Estimates of Agricultural Uses of Diclofop-methyl
(110902)

Sorted Alphabetically

Reporting Years: 2004-2012

Average Lbs. A.I.	Percent Crop Treated

	Crop	Applied Annually	Average	Maximum

1	Barley	5,000	<1	<2.5

2	Wheat	60,000	<1	<2.5

All numbers are rounded.

  	<2.5: less than 2.5 percent of crop is treated.

 	 <1: less than 1 percent of crop is treated.

SLUA data sources include:

USDA-NASS (United States Department of Agriculture's National
Agricultural Statistics Service)

Private Pesticide Market Research

These results reflect amalgamated data developed by the Agency and are
releasable to the public.


[Federal Register: July 28, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 145)]
[Notices]
[Page 43749]
[DOCID:fr28jy08-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER08-1255-000]

Oak Creek Wind Power, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

July 18, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Oak Creek Wind Power, LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR Part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is August 7, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-17174 Filed 7-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: October 5, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 191)]
[Notices]
[Page 51209-51211]
[DOCID:fr05oc09-99]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60737; File No. SR-NYSE-2009-96]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change by New York Stock Exchange LLC Permitting Affiliation With NYFIX
Millennium L.L.C. and NYFIX Securities Corporation

September 29, 2009.

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on September 22, 2009, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(``NYSE'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to be affiliated with two registered broker-
dealer subsidiaries of NYFIX, Inc. (``NYFIX''), NYFIX Millennium L.L.C.
(``NYFIX Millennium'') and NYFIX Securities Corporation (``NYFIX
Securities''), for a period not to exceed six months and subject to
certain limitations and obligations relating to the relationship.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at

the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is making this submission in connection with the
proposed acquisition of NYFIX by NYSE Technologies. On August 26, 2009,
NYSE Technologies entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (as it
may be amended from time to time, the ``Merger Agreement'') with NYFIX
and CBR Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned
subsidiary of NYSE Technologies. Under the terms of the Merger
Agreement, CBR Acquisition Corp. will merge with and into NYFIX, with
NYFIX surviving the merger as a direct wholly owned subsidiary of NYSE
Technologies (the ``Merger''). Following the Merger, both the Exchange
and NYFIX will be indirect wholly owned subsidiaries of NYSE Euronext
and affiliates.
    As a result of the Merger, NYSE Technologies will acquire, among
other things, NYFIX's Transaction Services Division. In the U.S., the
Transaction Services Division is currently comprised of two U.S.
registered broker-dealer subsidiaries, NYFIX Millennium, which is also
an alternative trading system registered under SEC Regulation ATS, and
NYFIX Securities.\4\ Each has the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority (``FINRA''), an unaffiliated self-regulatory organization
(``SRO''), as its designated examining authority. Neither broker-dealer
is a member of the Exchange. The Exchange notes that there is
competition in the market to provide introducing broker services to the
Exchange and the Exchange believes that there will continue to be
effective competition after the Merger.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Outside of the U.S., the NYFIX Transaction Services Division
also operates the desk agency execution business of NYFIX
International in the U.K. and Euro Millennium, a multi-lateral
trading facility for non-displayed liquidity in pan-European listed
equities housed within NYFIX International. These services are not
within the scope of the Exchange's Proposed Rule Change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For purposes of this proposed rule change, Routing Services shall
mean any of the activities of NYFIX Millennium and NYFIX Securities
which relate to routing to marketplaces that are not operated by NYFIX,
orders (including NYFIX Millennium ``pass through'' orders) which flow
through the matching facility on their way to an exchange, electronic
communications network, or ATS,\5\ and NYFIX Securities' direct
electronic market access and algorithmic trading products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ These orders are only executed if they find a match at or
within the national best bid and offer by guaranteeing customers the
best available ask price when buying securities, and the best
available bid price when selling securities. If there is not a
match, these orders are immediately routed to their ultimate
destination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is currently exploring various alternatives for the
Transaction Services Division. Because of the manner in which the
Transaction Services Division may interact with the Exchange and its
affiliates, which gives rise to concerns regarding (1) the potential
for conflicts of interest in instances where an exchange is affiliated
with a broker-dealer conducting an order routing business that may
interact with the exchange itself, and (2) the potential for
informational advantages that could place such an affiliated broker-
dealer at a competitive advantage vis-[agrave]-vis other non-affiliated
broker-dealers, the Exchange proposes to be affiliated with NYFIX
Millennium and NYFIX Securities for a period not to exceed six months
and subject to the terms and conditions set out below.
a. Conditions
    Accordingly, the Exchange represents as follows, in each case for
so long as the Exchange is affiliated with NYFIX Millennium and NYFIX
Securities, with respect to the Routing Services:
    (1) Neither NYFIX Millennium nor NYFIX Securities are members of
the Exchange nor will they become members of the Exchange.
    (2) NYFIX does not offer order routing services other than the
Routing Services, and none of the Routing Services will be modified
unless such modification is approved by the Commission.
    (3) NYFIX will not engage in proprietary trading.
    (4) NYFIX will not accept any new clients for its Routing Services
after the Merger.
    (5) There will continue to be independent functionality of, and
full public access to, NYSE facilities.
    (6) There will be a complete separation between NYFIX, on the one
hand, and the Exchange and its affiliates, on the other (e.g., no
shared office space, no shared employees, no shared systems).
    The Exchange may furnish to NYFIX the same information on the same
terms that the Exchange makes available in the normal course of
business to any other person. Specifically:
    (a) NYFIX must not be provided an information advantage concerning
the operation of the Exchange or any of its facilities, particularly
regarding changes and improvements to the trading systems, that are not
available to the industry generally.
    (b) NYFIX will be prevented from having any advance knowledge of
proposed changes or modifications to the operations of the Exchange or
their facilities, including but not limited to advance knowledge of
related filings by the Exchange pursuant to Rule 19b-4 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (c) NYFIX will not share employees or databases with the Exchange,
any facility of the Exchange, or any other affiliate of the Exchange or
their facilities, and will be housed in a separate office.
    (d) NYFIX will only be notified of any changes or improvements to
any of the Exchange's operations or trading facilities in the same
manner that other persons are notified of such changes or improvements.
    (e) NYFIX will not disclose any system or design specifications, or
any other information, to any employees of the Exchange, any facility
of the Exchange, or any other affiliate of the Exchange or their
facilities that would give NYFIX an unfair advantage over its
competitors.
    (f) None of the Exchange, any facility of the Exchange, or any
other affiliate of the Exchange or their facilities will disclose any
system or design specifications, or any other information, to any
employees of NYFIX or any affiliate of NYFIX that would give the
Exchange, any other facility of the Exchange, any other affiliate of
the Exchange, or NYFIX an unfair advantage over its competitors.
    The Exchange believes these measures effectively address the
concerns noted above regarding the potential for conflicts of interest
and informational advantages favoring NYFIX Millennium and NYFIX
Securities vis-[agrave]-vis other non-affiliated market participants.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that this filing is consistent with Section
6(b) \7\ of the Exchange Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(1),\9\ in particular, in that it enables the
Exchange to be so organized as to have the capacity to be able to carry
out the purposes of the Exchange Act and to comply, and to enforce
compliance by

its exchange members and persons associated with its exchange members,
with the provisions of the Exchange Act, the rules and regulations
thereunder, and the rules of the Exchange. The Exchange also believes
that this filing furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \10\ of the
Exchange Act because the rules summarized herein would create a
governance and regulatory structure that is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to, and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. In
particular, the Proposed Rule Change sets forth certain conditions
under which the Routing Services will be provided so as to assure that
the potential for conflicts of interests and informational advantages
are adequately addressed. The conditions under which the Exchange is
permitted to be affiliated with the entities conducting the Routing
Services will also be limited to no more than 6 months.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78a, et seq.
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve the proposed rule change, or
    (B) Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-NYSE-2009-96 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-2009-96. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of NYSE. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSE-2009-96 and should be
submitted on or before October 26, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-23853 Filed 10-2-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 83 (Friday, April 29, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25660-25661]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10137]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-1465-000]

Palmco Power MI LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Palmco Power MI LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is May 11, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 21, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-10137 Filed 4-28-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 43 (Friday, March 4, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12100-12101]
[FR Doc No: 2011-4842]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings No. 2

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP10-1321-001.
    Applicants: Freebird Gas Storage, L.L.C.
    Description: Freebird Gas Storage, L.L.C. submits tariff filing per
154.205(a): Freebird Gas Tariff Withdrawal Filing to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 02/24/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110224-5109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: RP11-1591-001.
    Applicants: Golden Pass Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Golden Pass Pipeline LLC submits tariff filing per
154.203: Revised TRVs Include omitted tariff record section titles to
be effective 3/1/2011.
    Filed Date: 02/24/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110224-5124.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 08, 2011.

    Docket Numbers: CP97-738-010.
    Applicants: Enogex LLC.
    Description: Petition for order amending limited jurisdiction of
Enogex LLC.
    Filed Date: 02/04/2011.
    Accession Number: 20110204-5095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 04, 2011.

    Any person desiring to protest this filing must file in accordance
with Rule 211 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18
CFR 385.211). Protests to this filing will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Such protests
must be filed on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. Anyone filing a protest must serve a copy of that document on all
the parties to the proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests in lieu
of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons
unable to file electronically should submit an original and 14 copies
of the protest to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 25, 2011.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-4842 Filed 3-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P