[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 44 (Tuesday, March 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14220-14221]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04626]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-259, OMB Control No. 3235-0269]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension: Rule 17f-5

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 350l-3520), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit the
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 17f-5 (17 CFR 270.17f-5) under the Investment Company Act of
1940 [15 U.S.C. 80a] (the ``Act'') governs the custody of the assets of
registered management investment companies (``funds'') with custodians
outside the United States. Under rule 17f-5, a fund or its foreign
custody manager (as delegated by the fund's board) may maintain the
fund's foreign assets in the care of an eligible fund custodian under
certain conditions. If the fund's board delegates to a foreign custody
manager authority to place foreign assets, the fund's board must find
that it is reasonable to rely on each delegate the board selects to act
as the fund's foreign custody manager. The delegate must agree to
provide written reports that notify the board when the fund's assets
are placed with a foreign custodian and when any material change occurs
in the fund's custody arrangements. The delegate must agree to exercise
reasonable care, prudence, and diligence, or to adhere to a higher
standard of care, in performing the delegated services. When the
foreign custody manager selects an eligible foreign custodian, it must
determine that the fund's assets will be subject to reasonable care if
maintained with that custodian, and that the written contract that
governs each custody arrangement will provide reasonable care for fund
assets. The contract must contain certain specified provisions or
others that provide at least equivalent care. The foreign custody
manager must establish a system to monitor the performance of the
contract and the appropriateness of continuing to maintain assets with
the eligible foreign custodian.
    The collection of information requirements in rule 17f-5 are
intended to provide protection for fund assets maintained with a
foreign bank custodian whose use is not authorized by statutory
provisions that govern fund custody arrangements,\1\ and that is not
subject to regulation and examination by U.S. regulators. The
requirement that the fund board determine that it is reasonable to rely
on each delegate is intended to ensure that the board carefully
considers each delegate's qualifications to perform its
responsibilities. The requirement that the delegate provide written
reports to the board is intended to ensure that the delegate notifies
the board of important developments concerning custody arrangements so
that the board may exercise effective oversight. The requirement that
the delegate agree to exercise reasonable care is intended to provide
assurances to the fund that the delegate will properly perform its
duties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See section 17(f) of the Act. 15 U.S.C. 80a-17(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The requirements that the foreign custody manager determine that
fund assets will be subject to reasonable care with the eligible
foreign custodian and under the custody contract, and that each
contract contain specified provisions or equivalent provisions, are
intended to ensure that the delegate has evaluated the level of care
provided by the custodian, that it weighs the adequacy of contractual
provisions, and that fund assets are protected by minimal contractual
safeguards. The requirement that the foreign custody manager establish
a monitoring system is intended to ensure that the manager periodically
reviews each custody arrangement and takes appropriate action if
developing custody risks may threaten fund assets.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The staff believes that subcustodian monitoring does not
involve ``collection of information'' within the meaning of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) (``Paperwork
Reduction Act'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commission staff estimates that each year, approximately 62
registrants \3\ could be required to make an average of one response
per registrant under rule 17f-5. A ``response'' may involve the fund's
directors making certain findings concerning foreign custody managers,
and the review and ratification of custodial contracts. Commission
staff estimates a response relating to these matters will require
approximately 2.5 hours of board of director time per response, to make
the necessary findings concerning foreign custody managers, and 1 hour
of related compliance attorney time per response, to assist the fund
board.\4\ For registrants, the total annual burden associated with
these requirements of the rule is up to approximately 217 hours (62
responses x 3.5 hours per response).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This figure is an estimate of the number of new management
investment company registrants each year, based on data reported on
Form N-CEN as of December 2019, 2020, and 2021. Commission staff
anticipates that the number of existing registrants that change
their foreign custody managers is negligible and, therefore, the
compliance burden of rule 17f-5 falls primarily on new registrants.
In practice, not all registrants will use foreign custody managers.
The actual figure therefore may be smaller.
    \4\ As discussed below, Commission staff estimate that a
response from a registrant will also include a related burden for
the applicable foreign custody manager chosen by the registrant's
board of directors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Foreign custody managers are also affected by the collection of
information requirements under rule 17f-5. Commission staff estimate
that, in connection with each registrant's board of directors making
certain findings concerning a foreign custody manager, those findings
will require approximately 20 hours of trust administrator time from
the applicable manager. This burden relates to the foreign custody
manager's initial considerations regarding custodial arrangements with
the registrant and preparing reports to the fund board.\5\ Commission
staff further estimate that annually, approximately 15 foreign custody
managers will be required to make an average of 4 responses per manager
concerning the use of foreign custodians other than depositories.\6\
This ``response'' may involve the foreign custody manager establishing
bank custody arrangements, negotiating/renegotiating custodial
contracts, preparing reports to fund boards, and

establishing and/or amending the foreign custody manager's system for
monitoring custody arrangements for its clients. The staff estimates
that each response will take approximately 250 hours of trust
administrator time, requiring approximately 1,000 total hours annually
per foreign custody manager (4 responses per foreign custody manager x
250 hours per response). Thus, the total annual burden for foreign
custody managers associated with the requirements of the rule is
approximately 16,240 hours ((62 responses by foreign custody managers x
20 hours per response) + (15 foreign custody managers x 4 responses per
manager) x 250 hours per response).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ This estimate does not include burden hours related to the
establishment and/or amendment of the foreign custody manager's
system for monitoring custody arrangements for its clients, which is
accounted for separately as discussed below.
    \6\ This figure is based on the staff's estimate of the number
of global custodians that may act as foreign custody managers under
rule 17f-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, the total annual burden of all collection of information
requirements of rule 17f-5 is estimated to be up to 16,457 hours (217
hours + 16,240 hours). The total monetized annual cost of burden hours
is estimated to be $5,166,833 ((217 hours x $3,529/hour blended wage
rate) + (16,240 hours x $271/hour for a trust administrator's
time)).\7\ Compliance with the collection of information requirements
of the rule is necessary to obtain the benefit of relying on the rule's
permission for funds to maintain their assets with foreign custodians.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The rates used to create the blended rate are as follow:
board of director time -$4,770 and compliance attorney time -$425.
Staff estimates concerning wage rates for the cost of board of
director time are based on fund industry representations. Based on
fund industry representations, the staff estimated in 2014 that the
average cost of board of director time, for the board as a whole,
was $4,000 per hour. Adjusting for inflation, the staff estimates
that the current average cost of board of director time is
approximately $4,770 per hour. Estimates concerning wage rates for
compliance attorneys and trust administrators are based on salary
information for the securities industry compiled by the Securities
Industry and Financial Markets Association and modified by
Commission staff for 2023. The compliance attorney and trust
administrator wage figures are based on published rates for each,
modified to account for a 1800-hour work-year and inflation, and
multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size, employee
benefits and overhead. See Securities Industry and Financial Markets
Association, Report on Management & Professional Earnings in the
Securities Industry 2013.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate is not derived
from a comprehensive or representative survey or study of the costs of
Commission rules and forms.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimate of the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted by May 8, 2023.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: David Bottom, Acting
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o John Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an
email to: [email protected].

    Dated: March 2, 2023.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-04626 Filed 3-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: March 10, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 46)]
[Notices]
[Page 11153]
[DOCID:fr10mr10-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13627-000]

Hydro Energy Technologies, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To
Intervene, and Competing Applications

March 1, 2010.
    On November 6, 2009, Hydro Energy Technologies, LLC (Hydro Energy
Technologies) filed an application for a preliminary permit, pursuant
to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the
feasibility of the Harpersfield Dam Hydroelectric Project No. 13627, to
be located at the existing Harpersfield Dam, on the Grand River, in
Ashtabula County, Ohio.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) An existing 8.5-foot-
high by 330-foot-long gravity dam; (2) a existing 36-acre impoundment
with a storage capacity of 250 acre feet.; (3) an existing filtration
plant to be converted into a powerhouse and installed with three new
turbine-generator units for a total installed capacity of 390
kilowatts; (4) a new 150-foot-long, 480-volt transmission line; and (5)
appurtenant facilities. The proposed project would operate in a run-of-
river mode and generate an estimated average annual generation of 2,200
megawatt-hours.
    Hydro Energy Technologies: Anthony J. Marra Jr., President, Hydro
Energy Technologies, LLC., 33 Commercial Street, Gloucester, MA 01930,
(978) 283-2822.
    FERC Contact: Michael Watts,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``eFiling'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
    Enter the docket number (P-13627) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-4997 Filed 3-9-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50937-50938]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23871]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements; Agency
Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR)
abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of
the information collection and its expected burden. The agency did not
receive comments on the Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period published on July 20, 2017.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 4, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, within 30 days, to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,
725 17th Street NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention NHTSA Desk
Officer.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Kathy J. Sifrit, Office of
Behavioral Safety Research (NPD-320), National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W46-472, Washington, DC
20590. Dr. Sifrit's phone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and her email address
is [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: Older Driver Rearview Video Systems.
    Type of Request: New information collection requirement.
    Abstract: A 2014 final rule by NHTSA requires rear visibility
technology in all new vehicles under 10,000 pounds by May 2018, but the
anticipated safety gains strongly depend on the extent to which drivers
understand and use the technology as intended. The purpose of this
study is to assess the driving performance of adults 60 and older using
traditional mirrors as compared to using a rearview video system (RVS)
during backing tasks; and to develop, implement, and assess the
effectiveness of an RVS training protocol.
    Study staff will invite drivers 60 and older from residential
communities, senior centers, and/or service or faith-based
organizations in southeast Pennsylvania to a public meeting to describe
the opportunity including inclusion and exclusion criteria. The project
plans to recruit a total of 200 participants for the study: 80 for
Segment 1 and 120 for Segment 2. Segment 1 participants will complete a
series of backing tasks in an instrumented vehicle as directed by a
driving evaluator. The 120 participants assigned to Segment 2 will
complete a 30-minute training session, which will be based on
participant errors and comments during Segment 1, before completing the
backing tasks in the same manner as the Segment 1 participants.
Participants will receive compensation for study participation at the
completion of the backing tasks.
    Findings will provide information about whether people ages 60 and
older differ in backing performance when using RVS versus traditional
inside traditional mirrors, which elements of RVS use are particularly
difficult for this cohort, and whether RVS training improves older
drivers' ability to use RVS to avoid obstacles while backing. NHTSA
will use the information to inform recommendations to the public
regarding backing practices for the purpose of reducing crashes.
    Affected Public: Participants will include 200 licensed drivers 60
and older.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: The total burden for data collection
would be 360 hours.
    Comments are invited on the following:
    (i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection;
    (iii) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
    (iv) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology. A comment to OMB is most
effective if OMB receives it within 30 days of publication of this
notice.

    Authority: 44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 30, 2017.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2017-23871 Filed 11-1-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: September 8, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 174)]
[Notices]
[Page 52035]
[DOCID:fr08se08-49]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 2145-087]

Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County; Notice of
Application for Amendment of License and Soliciting Comments, Motions
To Intervene, And Protests

August 29, 2008.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Change in Project Land Rights and Project
Boundary.
    b. Project No.: 2145-087.
    c. Date Filed: June 6, 2008 and supplemented on July 16, 2008.
    d. Applicant: Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County.
    e. Name of Project: Rocky Reach Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Columbia River in Chelan
County, Washington. Specifically, at Entiat Park.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r)
    h. Applicant Contact: Michelle Smith, License and Natural Resource
Compliance Manager, Public Utility District No. 1 of Chelan County,
P.O. Box 1231, Wenatchee, WA 98807-1231. Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Ext.
4180.
    i. FERC Contact: Any questions on this notice should be addressed
to Brian Romanek at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests: October 2, 2008
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all interveners filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervener files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency. A copy of any motion to intervene must also be
served upon each representative of the applicant specified in the
particular application.
    k. Description of the Application: The applicant is seeking
Commission authorization for an exchange of 0.5 acre of project land,
owned by the licensee, for 8.53 acres owned by the City of Entiat
(City). The parcel the licensee would acquire is located between two
parcels of parkland (Entiat Park) owned by the licensee. This land
exchange would allow the licensee to own the entire park. The park is a
part of the project's approved recreation plan and is enclosed within
the project boundary. The 0.5 acres to be conveyed to the City would be
removed from the project boundary.
    l. Location of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene--Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Any filings must bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable,
and the Project Number of the particular application to which the
filing refers.
    p. Agency Comments--Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the application. A copy of the application may be
obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If an agency does not
file comments within the time specified for filing comments, it will be
presumed to have no comments. One copy of an agency's comments must
also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
    q. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-20716 Filed 9-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 216 (Wednesday, November 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67683-67684]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24439]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER17-256-015; ER17-242-014; ER17-243-014; ER17-245-
014; ER17-652-014.
    Applicants: Lightstone Marketing LLC, Waterford Power, LLC,
Lawrenceburg Power, LLC, Gavin Power, LLC, Darby Power, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Darby
Power, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 11/2/22.
    Accession Number: 20221102-5197.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/23/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2818-001.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to ISA, SA No. 6594; Queue
Nos. AE2-334 & AG1-103 Correction to Filing to be effective 8/9/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20221103-5088.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-360-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original UCSA, Service
Agreement No. 6676; Queue Position J799 to be effective 10/5/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20221103-5034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-361-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original ISA, Service
Agreement No. 6675; Queue No. AE1-225 to be effective 10/4/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20221103-5039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-362-000.
    Applicants: Avista Corporation.
    Description: Compliance Filing for Order No. 676-J of Avista
Corporation.
    Filed Date: 11/2/22.
    Accession Number: 20221102-5194.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/23/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-363-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: First Revised Service
Agreement No. 5814, Queue No. AD1-041/AE1-190/AE1-191 to be effective
10/5/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20221103-5040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-364-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Sch. 12-Appx A:
October 2022 RTEP, 30-Day Comment Period Requested to be effective 2/1/
2023.
    Filed Date: 11/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20221103-5064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-365-000.
    Applicants: Calhoun Power Company, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Notice of Cancellation of Market-
Based Rate Tariff to be effective 11/4/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20221103-5078.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-366-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: ISA, SA No. 2782; Queue No.
W3-002 to be effective 2/2/2011.
    Filed Date: 11/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20221103-5083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-367-000.
    Applicants: OnPoint Energy Illinois, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Market-Based Rate Application
and Request for Expedited Action to be effective 11/4/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20221103-5093.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-368-000.
    Applicants: OnPoint Energy Ohio LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Market-Based Rate Application
and Request for Expedited Action to be effective 11/4/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20221103-5098.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-369-000.
    Applicants: OnPoint Energy Pennsylvania, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Market-Based Rate Application
and Request for Expedited Action to be effective 11/4/2022.
    Filed Date: 11/3/22.
    Accession Number: 20221103-5099.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/25/22.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings

must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 3, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-24439 Filed 11-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: November 12, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 217)]
[Notices]
[Page 58268-58269]
[DOCID:fr12no09-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP10-10-000]

CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission Company; Notice of
Application

November 4, 2009.
    Take notice that on October 27, 2009, CenterPoint Energy Gas
Transmission Company (CEGT), 1111 Louisiana Street, Houston, Texas
77002, filed in Docket No. CP10-10-000, an application pursuant to
Section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the
Commission's regulations, requesting authorization to abandon by sale
and transfer to CenterPoint Energy Field Services, Inc. (CEFS) Line B-
55 EXT in its entirety and an approximately two mile long segment of
Line B-106, located in Sebastian and Crawford Counties, Arkansas; and,
to abandon in place its Hobbs Compressor Station, located in Sebastian
County, Arkansas, all as more fully set forth in the application which
is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. This
filing may also be viewed on the Commission's Web site at http://
www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number,
excluding the last three digits, in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY, (202) 502-
8659.
    Any questions regarding this application should be directed to B.
Michelle Willis, Manager, Regulatory & Compliance, CenterPoint Energy
Gas Transmission Company, P.O. Box 21734, Shreveport, Louisiana 71151,
or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER> (telephone) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (fax),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or to Mark C. Schroeder, Vice
President & General Counsel, CenterPoint Energy Gas Transmission
Company, P.O. Box 1700, Houston, Texas 77210-1700, or by calling (713)
207-3395 (telephone) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (fax),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding, or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify Federal and State agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all Federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be

placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    Motions to intervene, protests and comments may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper; see, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.
    Comment Date: November 25, 2009.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-27121 Filed 11-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 14, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 135)]
[Notices]
[Page 40399]
[DOCID:fr14jy08-128]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension:
    Rule 17f-2(c); SEC File No. 270-35; OMB Control No. 3235-0029.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. ) the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
     Rule 17f-2(c) (17 CFR 240.17f-2(c)).
    Rule 17f-2(c) allows persons required to be fingerprinted pursuant
to Section 17(f)(2) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to submit
their fingerprints through a registered securities exchange or a
national securities association in accordance with a plan submitted to
and approved by the Commission. The Commission has approved such plans
for several exchanges and for the Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'').
    It is estimated that 5,984 respondents submit approximately 368,000
fingerprint cards to exchanges or a national securities association on
an annual basis. The Commission estimates that it would take
approximately 15 minutes to create and submit each fingerprint card.
The total reporting burden is therefore estimated to be 92,000 hours,
or approximately 15 hours per respondent, annually. In addition, the
exchanges and FINRA charge an estimated $30 fee for processing
fingerprint cards, resulting in a total annual cost to all 5,984
respondents of $11,040,000, or $1,845 per respondent per year.
    Because the Federal Bureau of Investigation will not accept
fingerprint cards directly from submitting organizations, Commission
approval of plans from certain exchanges and national securities
associations is essential to the Congressional goal of fingerprint
personnel in the security industry. The filing of these plans for
review assures users and their personnel that fingerprint cards will be
handled responsibly and with due care for confidentiality.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    Please direct your written comments to Lewis W. Walker, Acting
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia,
22312; or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 7, 2008.
Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-15904 Filed 7-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 230 (Friday, December 3, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68538-68539]
[FR Doc No: 2021-26237]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0801; Airspace Docket No. 20-ASO-29]
RIN 2120-AA66

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Fulton, KY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface for Fulton Airport, Fulton, KY, to
accommodate new area navigation (RNAV) global positioning system (GPS)
standard instrument approach procedures (SIAPs) serving this airport.
Controlled airspace is necessary for the safety and management of
instrument flight rules (IFR) operations in the area.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, January 27, 2022. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; Telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order JO 7400.11F at NARA, email
[email protected] or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Ave., College Park, GA 30337; Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106,
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes Class E airspace for Fulton Airport, Fulton, KY.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (86 FR 52622, September 22, 2021) for Docket No. FAA-2021-0801
to establish Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface for Fulton Airport, Fulton, KY.
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in Paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the FAA Order JO 7400.11.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic routes, and reporting
points.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending 14 CFR part 71 by establishing Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface within a 7.3-mile
radius at Fulton Airport, Fulton, KY, to accommodate new area
navigation (RNAV) global positioning system (GPS) standard instrument
approach procedures (SIAPs) serving this airport. These changes are
necessary for continued safety and management of IFR operations in the
area.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is minimal. Since this is a routine matter that only
affects air traffic procedures an air navigation, it is certified that
this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO KY E5 Fulton, KY [New]

Fulton Airport, KY
    (Lat. 36[deg]31'32'' N, long. 88[deg]55'04'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7.3-mile radius of Fulton Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on November 29, 2021.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2021-26237 Filed 12-2-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P