[Federal Register: March 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 54)]
[Notices]
[Page 13533-13534]
[DOCID:fr22mr10-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP10-41-000]

Paiute Pipeline Company; Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Pauite Pipeline 2010
Expansion Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues

March 16, 2010.
    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) will prepare an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts of the 2010 Expansion Project
involving construction and operation of facilities proposed by Paiute
Pipeline Company (Paiute) in Douglas and Washoe Counties, Nevada. This
EA will be used by the Commission in its decision-making process to
determine whether the project is in the public convenience and
necessity.
    This notice announces the opening of the scoping process the
Commission will use to gather input from the public and interested
agencies on the project. Your input will help the Commission staff
determine what issues need to be evaluated in the EA. Please note that
the scoping period will close on April 22, 2010.
    This notice is being sent to the Commission's current environmental
mailing list for this project. State and local government
representatives are asked to notify their constituents of this planned
project and encourage them to comment on their areas of concern.
    If you are a landowner receiving this notice, you may be contacted
by a pipeline company representative about the acquisition of an
easement to construct, operate, and maintain the proposed facilities.
The company would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable agreement.
However, if the project is approved by the Commission, that approval
conveys with it the right of eminent domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an agreement, the pipeline company could
initiate condemnation proceedings in accordance with state law.
    A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility On My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' was attached to the
project notice Paiute provided to landowners. This fact sheet addresses
a number of typically asked questions, including the use of eminent
domain and how to participate in the Commission's proceedings. It is
also available for viewing on the FERC website (http://www.ferc.gov).

Summary of the Proposed Project

    On January 12, 2010 Paiute filed an application with the FERC under
section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act. The FERC issued a Notice of
Application for this project on January 22, 2010.
    Paiute proposes to construct and operate certain mainline natural
gas facilities to enable Paiute to enhance the capacity of its South
Tahoe Lateral to meet the growth requirements of its two expansion
project shippers: Southwest-Northern California and Southwest-Northern
Nevada.\1\ The 2010 Expansion Project would provide about 2,265
dekatherms per day of additional firm transportation capacity from the
Wadsworth Junction Receipt Point to delivery points located at or near
the terminus of Paiute's South Tahoe Lateral.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Southwest--Northern California and Southwest--Northern
Nevada are affiliates of Paiute Parent Company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The 2010 Expansion Project would consist of the following:
     Approximately 0.9 miles of new 12-inch-diameter pipeline
looping \2\ to be constructed and operated between mileposts (MP) 2.41
and 3.35 on Paiute's existing South Tahoe Lateral in Douglas County,
Nevada;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ A ``loop'' is a segment of new pipeline installed adjacent
to an existing pipeline, and connected to the existing pipelines on
both ends, that allows more natural gas to follow through that
segment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Modifications at the existing Stateline City Gate No. 4
delivery point located at MP 6.80 on the South Tahoe Lateral in Douglas
County, Nevada by replacing the existing 3-inch pressure regulator and
4-inch strainer with a 6-inch filter;
     Modifications at the existing South Lake Tahoe City Gate
delivery point, at MP 7.55 on the South Tahoe Lateral in Douglas
County, Nevada; and
     Modifications at the existing Wadsworth Pressure Limiting
Station, at MP 0.0 of the Carson Lateral, in Washoe County, Nevada;
    The general location of the project facilities is shown in Appendix
1.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register. Copies of appendices were sent to
all those receiving this notice in the mail and are available at
http://www.ferc.gov using the link called ``eLibrary'' or from the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, or call<PHONE_NUMBER>. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Land Requirements for Construction

    Construction of the proposed facilities would disturb a total of
about 10.5 acres of land for the aboveground facilities and the
pipeline combined. Approximately 4.5 acres would be retained as part of
Paiute's permanent operational easement, after construction. The
remaining acreage would be restored to its former condition and uses.

The EA Process

    The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
\4\ to discover and address concerns the public may have about
proposals. This process is referred to as ``scoping''. The main goal of
the scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the important
environmental issues. By this notice, the Commission requests public
comments on the scope of the issues to address in the EA. All comments
received will be considered during the preparation of the EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ ``We'', ``us'', and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Commission's Office of Energy Projects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the EA we will discuss impacts that could occur as a result of
the construction and operation of the proposed project under these
general headings:
     Geology and soils;
     Water resources, fisheries, and wetlands;
     Vegetation and wildlife;
     Cultural resources;
     Land use and recreation;
     Air quality and noise; and
     Safety and reliability
    We will also evaluate reasonable alternatives to the proposed
project or portions of the project, and make recommendations on how to
lessen or avoid impacts on the various resource areas.
    Our independent analysis of the issues will be presented in the EA.
The EA will be placed in the public record and, depending on the
comments received during the scoping process, may be published and
distributed to the public. A comment period will be allotted if the EA
is published for review. We will consider all comments on the EA before
we make our recommendations to the Commission. To ensure your comments
are considered, please carefully follow the instructions in the Public
Participation section below.
    With this notice, we are asking agencies with jurisdiction and/or
special expertise with respect to environmental issues to formally
cooperate with us in the preparation of the EA. These agencies may
choose to

participate once they have evaluated the proposal relative to their
responsibilities. Agencies that would like to request cooperating
agency status should follow the instructions for filing comments
provided under the Public Participation section below.

Consultations Under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act

    In accordance with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's
implementing regulations for the section 106 process, we are using this
notice to solicit the views of the public on the project's potential
effects on historic properties.\5\ We will document our findings on the
impacts on cultural resources and summarize the status of consultations
under section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act in our EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation's regulations
are at Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Sec.  800.2(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Participation

    You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the project. Your comments should focus on
the potential environmental effects, reasonable alternatives, and
measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts. The more specific
your comments, the more useful they will be. To ensure that your
comments are timely and properly recorded, please send your comments so
that they will be received in Washington, DC on or before April 22,
2010.
    For your convenience, there are three methods which you can use to
submit your comments to the Commission. The Commission encourages
electronic filing of comments and has expert eFiling staff available to
assist you at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (1) You may file your comments electronically by using the Quick
Comment feature, which is located at http://www.ferc.gov under the link
called ``Documents and Filings.'' A Quick Comment is an easy method for
interested persons to submit text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You may file your comments electronically by using the
``eFiling'' feature that is listed under the ``Documents and Filings''
link. eFiling involves preparing your submission in the same manner as
you would if filing on paper, and then saving the file on your
computer's hard drive. You will attach that file to your submission.
New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on the links
called ``Sign up'' or ``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the
type of filing you are making. A comment on a particular project is
considered a ``Comment on a Filing''; or
    (3) You may file a paper copy of your comments at the following
address: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.

Environmental Mailing List

    The environmental mailing list includes federal, state, and local
government representatives and agencies; elected officials;
environmental and public interest groups; Native American tribes; other
interested parties; and local libraries and newspapers. This list also
includes all affected landowners (as defined in the Commission's
regulations) who are potential right-of-way grantors, whose property
may be used temporarily for project purposes, or who own homes within
certain distances of aboveground facilities, and anyone who submits
comments on the project. We will update the environmental mailing list
as the analysis proceeds to ensure that we send the information related
to this environmental review to all individuals, organizations, and
government entities interested in and/or potentially affected by the
proposed project.
    If the EA is published for distribution, copies will be sent to the
environmental mailing list for public review and comment. If you would
prefer to receive a paper copy of the document instead of the CD
version or would like to remove your name from the mailing list, please
return the attached Information Request (Appendix 2).

Becoming an Intervenor

    In addition to involvement in the EA scoping process, you may want
to become an ``intervenor,'' which is an official party to the
Commission's proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the
process and are able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard
by the courts if they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling.
An intervenor formally participates in the proceeding by filing a
request to intervene. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are
included in the User's Guide under the ``e-filing'' link on the
Commission's Web site.

Additional Information

    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Click
on the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field
(i.e., CP10-41). Be sure you have selected an appropriate date range.
For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or for TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>. The eLibrary link also provides access to the
texts of formal documents issued by the Commission, such as orders,
notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to http://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.
    Finally, public meetings or site visits will be posted on the
Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/
EventsList.aspx along with other related information.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-6236 Filed 3-19-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Kristin Fitzgerald/DC/USEPA/US

12/20/2006 10:58 AM	To

<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> 	cc

	bcc

	Patricia Mercer/DC/USEPA/US@EPA; Meg McCarthy/DC/USEPA/US@EPA; James

Michael/DC/USEPA/US@EPA; Betsy Devlin/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

	Subject

	Follow-up Question to CSHEMA comments

Peter A. Reinhardt and Sandra Lynn Neuse

Co-Chairs, Government Relations Committee

Campus Safety, Health and Environmental Management Association

Division of the National Safety Council

Dear Mr. Reinhardt and Ms. Neuse,

 Thank you for your comments on EPA’s Proposed Rule: Subpart K—Standards

Applicable to Academic Laboratories (71 Federal Register 29712) on behalf

of the Campus Safety Health and Environmental Management Association

(CSHEMA), a division of the National Safety Council.

In response to CSHEMA’s comments (Docket Number

EPA-HQ-RCRA-2003-0012-0078.1), EPA has a follow-up question.  In the

preamble to the proposed rule (page 29720), EPA estimated that hazardous

laboratory waste constitutes 9% of the annual hazardous waste generated by

college and university large quantity generators.  EPA based this number

on data submitted to EPA by colleges and universities that are large

quantity generators, as part of the 2001 Biennial Report.

In contrast, on page 37 of CSHEMA’s comments to the docket, CSHEMA

commented that “an informal poll of large quantity generator academic

institutions indicates that laboratory waste represents between 65% and

95% of annual hazardous waste generation.”  EPA is very interested in data

that CSHEMA has and can provide to support this assertion.  This

information would be beneficial to EPA in its development of the final

rule, in order to have a fuller understanding of the laboratory waste

generation patterns at colleges and universities.  Unfortunately, this

comment is not useful to EPA without supporting data that can substantiate

or validate the results of the “informal poll.”  EPA would find it helpful

if you could provide an explanation of the origins of the data, and how or

why the data may differ from the Biennial Report data we relied on.  In

addition, we would appreciate a timely response to allow us to incorporate

any information you may provide into the decision-making process, as

appropriate.   Please provide a response by the end of January 2007.  If

you are unable to provide a response by then, please contact us to let us

know if and when you could provide a timely response.

Any supporting information you provide to EPA will be made publicly

available in the docket for the rulemaking, unless the information is

claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI). Therefore, if you

submit any information that you claim as CBI, clearly mark all of the

information that you claim to be CBI.  Information so marked will not be

disclosed, except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part

2.  Please do not fax any information claimed as CBI.  For additional

information on how to submit CBI, refer to page 29713, of the May 23,

2006, Federal Register, proposed rule for academic laboratories, or

contact LaShan Haynes, the Office of Solid Waste CBI contact, at (703)

605-0516<EMAIL_ADDRESS> Again, thank you for your comments on the proposed standards for academic

laboratories.  Please direct any questions or response to this letter to

any member of EPA’s labs team:

Patricia Mercer,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Meg McCarthy,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Kristin Fitzgerald,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS> **************************************************************

Kristin Fitzgerald

US EPA - Office of Solid Waste

mail code:  5304P

phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>

fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

email<EMAIL_ADDRESS> work schedule:  Tuesday/Thursday