[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 4021-4025]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02203]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R01-OAR-2018-0829; FRL-9989-01-Region 1]

Air Plan Approval; Massachusetts; Nonattainment New Source Review
Program Revisions; Infrastructure Provisions for National Ambient Air
Quality Standards; Nonattainment New Source Review Requirements for the
2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. On February 9, 2018, the Massachusetts
Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) submitted revisions to
the EPA satisfying the MassDEP's earlier commitment to adopt and submit
provisions that meet certain requirements of the Nonattainment New
Source Review (NNSR) air permit program regulations. The EPA is also
proposing to approve the Commonwealth's NNSR certification, which was
included in the February 9, 2018 SIP revision, as sufficient for the
purposes of satisfying the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS). In addition, this action will also convert
the EPA's December 21, 2016 conditional approval for certain
infrastructure provisions relating to Massachusetts's NNSR air permit
program to full approval. This action is being taken under the Clean
Air Act.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 18, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R01-
OAR-2018-0829 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. Publicly
available docket materials are available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Region 1 Regional
Office, Office of Ecosystem Protection, Air Permits, Toxics, and Indoor
Programs Unit, 5 Post Office Square--Suite 100, Boston, MA. The EPA
requests that if at all possible, you contact the contact listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday

through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding legal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Wortman, Office of Ecosystem
Protection, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Region 1, 5 Post
Office Square--Suite 100 (Mail Code OEP05-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912,
tel.<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Massachusetts's February 9, 2018 SIP Submittal Addressing the
EPA's December 21, 2016 Conditional Approval Regarding 310 CMR 7.00
    A. What is the background information for the EPA's December 21,
2016 conditional approval?
    B. What is a conditional approval?
    C. Were the terms of the December 21, 2016 conditional approval
met?
II. Proposed Approval of NNSR Certification
    A. Background on the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS
    B. Analysis of Massachusetts's NNSR Requirements
III. Proposed Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order reviews

I. Massachusetts's February 9, 2018 SIP Submittal Addressing the EPA's
December 21, 2016 Conditional Approval Regarding 310 CMR 7.00

A. What is the background information for the EPA's December 21, 2016
conditional approval?

    On December 21, 2016, the EPA published a final conditional
approval for Massachusetts's June 6, 2014 SIP submittal. See 81 FR
93627. That conditional approval identified a number of issues. One of
those issues relates to a provision under Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)
of the Clean Air Act (CAA) that was not included in the Commonwealth's
June 6, 2014 SIP submittal. In a letter dated June 14, 2016, the
Commonwealth committed to submitting for inclusion in the SIP, by a
date no later than one year from conditional approval of
Massachusetts's infrastructure SIP submissions, the necessary
provisions that would address the identified issues. The conditional
approval was part of the EPA's December 21, 2016 final action on
Massachusetts's infrastructure SIP submittal for the 1997 ozone, 2008
lead (Pb), 2008 ozone, 2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and 2010
sulfur dioxide (SO2) NAAQS. See 81 FR 93627.

B. What is a conditional approval?

    Under section 110(k)(4) of the CAA, the EPA may conditionally
approve a plan based on a commitment from the state to adopt specific
enforceable measures by a date no later than one year from the
effective date of final conditional approval. If the EPA subsequently
determines that the state has met its commitment, the EPA publishes a
document in the Federal Register notifying the public that the EPA is
converting the conditional approval to a full approval.
    Otherwise, if the state fails to meet its commitment in a timely
manner, then the conditional approval automatically converts to a
disapproval. If that were to occur, the EPA would then notify the state
by letter. At that time, the conditionally approved SIP revisions would
not be part of the state's approved SIP. The EPA subsequently would
publish a document in the Federal Register notifying the public that
the conditional approval had converted to a disapproval.
    The EPA's December 21, 2016 conditional approval required the
MassDEP to submit revised regulations that address Prong 3 of Section
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) of the CAA. To address the conditional approval, on
February 9, 2018, the MassDEP submitted regulatory provisions for
approval into the Commonwealth's SIP. As explained in Section I.C of
this document, the revisions addressed the NNSR requirements that would
make the Commonwealth's NNSR program applicable to sources regardless
of the attainment status of the area where the source is located. These
revisions were necessary because Massachusetts is located in the Ozone
Transport Region (OTR).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ CAA section 184 details specific requirements for a group of
states (and the District of Columbia) that make up the OTR. States
in the OTR are required to mandate a certain level of emissions
control for the pollutants that form ozone, even if the areas in the
state meet the ozone standards. Thus, NNSR permitting requirements
apply statewide, even if the state is designated attainment for the
ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Were the terms of the December 21, 2016 conditional approval met?

    Section 110(a)(2)(D) contains a comprehensive set of air quality
management elements pertaining to the transport of air pollution that
states must address. It covers the following five topics, categorized
as sub-elements: Sub-element 1, Contribute to nonattainment, and
interfere with maintenance of a NAAQS; Sub-element 2, Prevention of
Significant Deterioration (PSD); Sub-element 3, Visibility protection;
Sub-element 4, Interstate pollution abatement; and Sub-element 5,
International pollution abatement. Sub-elements 1 through 3 are found
under section 110(a)(2)(D)(i) of the Act, and these items are further
categorized into four prongs.
    One aspect of section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) requires SIPs to include
provisions prohibiting any source or other type of emissions activity
in one state from interfering with measures required to prevent
significant deterioration of air quality in another state. The EPA
sometimes refers to this requirement under subsection
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II) as prong 3. A state's infrastructure SIP submittal
cannot be considered approvable for prong 3 of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II)
unless the EPA has issued final approval of the state's PSD SIP, or
alternatively, has issued final approval of a SIP that the EPA has
otherwise found adequate to prohibit interference with other states'
measures to prevent significant deterioration of air quality.
    Under prong 3 of 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), the EPA also reviews the
potential for in-state sources not subject to PSD to interfere with PSD
in an attainment or unclassifiable area of another state. EPA guidance
recommends that a ``fully approved NNSR program with respect to any
previous NAAQS may generally be considered by the EPA as adequate for
purposes of meeting this requirement of prong 3 with respect to sources
and pollutants subject to such program.'' \2\ The EPA last approved the
Commonwealth's NNSR program on October 27, 2000. See 65 FR 64360.
Because Massachusetts is located within the OTR,\3\ the CAA requires
sources emitting 100 tons per year (tpy) or more of nitrogen oxides
(NOX) or 50 tpy or more of volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
located in attainment or unclassifiable areas to be subject to the
requirements that would be applicable to major stationary sources if
the area were classified as a moderate nonattainment area. See CAA
sections 182(f)(1), 184(b)(2), 42 U.S.C. 7511a, 7511c. In other words,
even if located in an area designated attainment or unclassifiable for
ozone, under the CAA and its implementing regulations, such sources are
subject to NNSR rather than PSD. The major source threshold for NNSR in
Massachusetts is currently 50 tpy for NOX instead of 100 tpy
due to the fact that part of Massachusetts had

been designated in 1990 as a serious nonattainment area for the 1979 1-
hour ozone standard.4 5 Massachusetts's current SIP-approved
NNSR regulations, however, apply only in nonattainment areas,\6\
meaning that sources with 50 tpy (see footnote 5) or more of either
VOCs or NOX emissions in much of Massachusetts are not
covered by either the PSD federal implementation plan (FIP), applicable
in the Commonwealth, or the Commonwealth's EPA-approved NNSR program.
Thus, the Commonwealth has not shown that it has met this requirement
of prong 3. However, as a matter of state regulation, the Commonwealth
has promulgated and implements NNSR regulations that make the
Commonwealth's NNSR program applicable to such sources regardless of
area designation. We are proposing to approve these regulations into
the Commonwealth's SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See page 32 of EPA's September 13, 2013 guidance titled
``Guidance on Infrastructure State Implementation Plan (SIP)
Elements under Clean Air Act Sections 110(a)(1) and 110(a)(2).''
    \3\ See CAA 184(a), 42 U.S.C. 7511c(a).
    \4\ On November 6, 1991, the EPA promulgated designations for
the 1979 1-hour ozone standard. See 56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991).
    \5\ Because Massachusetts is in the OTR, the major source
threshold for VOCs is 50 tpy.
    \6\ At the time the EPA last approved Massachusetts's NNSR
regulations (October 27, 2000; 65 FR 64361), the Western
Massachusetts area was nonattainment for the 1979 1-hour ozone
NAAQS, and the Eastern Massachusetts area was attaining that NAAQS.
The Eastern Massachusetts area became nonattainment as of January
16, 2001 when the EPA reinstated the 1-hour ozone NAAQS for that
area. See 65 FR 45181 (July 20, 2000).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 9, 2018, MassDEP submitted the necessary provisions for
inclusion into the SIP to make its EPA-approved NNSR program applicable
to such sources and address the relevant issues identified in the EPA's
December 21, 2016 conditional approval. Specifically, MassDEP's SIP
submittal included the following revisions to 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix A
for inclusion in the SIP:
     The Introduction in section (1) of Appendix A was revised
to clarify that any source that is major for VOCs or NOX is
subject to the requirements in Appendix A.
     Section (b) of the definition of Major Modification was
revised to remove the requirement that a major source must be located
in an ozone nonattainment area for the purpose of applying the
requirements of Appendix A.
     Section (b) of the definition of Major Stationary Source
was revised to remove the requirement that a major stationary source of
NOX must be located in an ozone nonattainment area for the
purpose of applying the requirements of Appendix A.
     The definition of Nonattainment Pollutant was added to
clarify that NOX and VOCs are considered nonattainment
pollutants regardless of the attainment designation status where the
source is located.
     Section (3) of Appendix A was revised at subsection (b) to
include the requirement for Appendix A to apply if a new major
stationary source or major modification is major for NOX or
VOCs.
    Massachusetts failed to submit the technical demonstration in a
timely manner. Therefore, our conditional approval became a disapproval
on January 20, 2018. However, as noted previously, on February 9, 2018,
the MassDEP submitted SIP revisions to the EPA to address the issues
identified in the December 21, 2016 conditional approval under prong 3
of Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II), effectively remedying the disapproval
relating to that provision of the CAA. The EPA has reviewed MassDEP's
SIP submittal and determined that MassDEP's regulations are consistent
with the underlying federal NNSR regulations in 40 CFR part 51 and meet
the terms of the December 21, 2016 conditional approval. Accordingly,
the EPA is proposing to approve the revisions into the SIP and convert
the December 21, 2016 conditional approval to a full approval for prong
3 of Section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II).

II. Proposed Approval of NNSR Certification

A. Background on the 2008 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS

    On March 12, 2008, the EPA promulgated a revised 8-hour ozone NAAQS
of 0.075 parts per million (ppm). See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008).
Under the EPA's regulations at 40 CFR 50.15, the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS is met at an ambient air quality monitoring site when the 3-year
average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average
ambient air quality ozone concentration is less than or equal to 0.075
ppm. Ambient air quality monitoring data for the 3-year period must
meet a data completeness requirement. The ambient air quality
monitoring data completeness requirement is met when the average
percent of days with valid ambient monitoring data is at least 90
percent, and no single year has less than 75 percent data completeness
as determined in Appendix I of part 50.
    Upon promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the CAA requires the
EPA to designate as nonattainment any area that is violating the NAAQS
based on the three most recent years of certified ambient air quality
data. Dukes County in Massachusetts was designated nonattainment for
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS on April 30, 2012 using 2009-2011 ambient
air quality data. See 77 FR 30088 (May 21, 2012). At the time of
designation, Dukes County was classified as a marginal nonattainment
area. On March 6, 2015, the EPA issued a final rule entitled,
``Implementation of the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Ozone: State Implementation Plan Requirements'' (SIP Requirements
Rule), which established the requirements that state, tribal, and local
air quality management agencies must meet in developing implementation
plans for areas where ozone concentrations exceed the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS.\7\ See 80 FR 12264. Areas that were designated as marginal
nonattainment areas for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS were required to
attain no later than July 20, 2015, based on 2012-2014 monitoring data.
See 40 CFR 51.1103. The Dukes County nonattainment area attained the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS by July 20, 2015, and therefore on April 11,
2016, the EPA Administrator signed a final determination of attainment
for the 2008 8-hour ozone standard for the Dukes County nonattainment
area. See 81 FR 26697 (May 4, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The SIP Requirements Rule addresses a range of nonattainment
area SIP requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS, including
requirements pertaining to attainment demonstrations, reasonable
further progress (RFP), reasonably available control technology,
reasonably available control measures, major new source review,
emission inventories, and the timing of SIP submissions and of
compliance with emission control measures in the SIP. The rule also
revokes the 1997 ozone NAAQS and establishes anti-backsliding
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on initial nonattainment designations for the 2008 8-hour
ozone standard, as well as the March 6, 2015 final SIP Requirements
Rule, Massachusetts was required to develop a SIP revision addressing
certain CAA requirements for the Dukes County nonattainment area, and
submit to the EPA an NNSR Certification SIP or SIP revision no later
than 36 months after the effective date of area designations for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS (i.e., July 20, 2015).8 9 Because
Massachusetts

already has a NNSR program that applies statewide, Massachusetts can
certify the adequacy of its existing NNSR program with respect to the
2008 ozone NAAQS for the Dukes County nonattainment area.\10\ See 40
CFR 51.1114.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Where an air agency determines that the provisions in or
referred to by its existing EPA approved SIP are adequate with
respect to a given infrastructure SIP element (or sub-element) even
in light of the promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the air
agency may make a SIP submission in the form of a certification.
This type of infrastructure SIP submission may, e.g., take the form
of a letter to the EPA from the Governor or her/his designee
containing a ``certification'' (or declaration) that the already-
approved SIP contains or references provisions that satisfy all or
some of the requirements of section 110(a)(2), as applicable, for
purposes of implementing the new or revised NAAQS.
    \9\ Massachusetts's obligation to submit the NNSR Certification
SIP was not affected by the D.C. Circuit Court's February 16, 2018
decision on portions of the SIP Requirements Rule in South Coast Air
Quality Mgmt. Dist. v. EPA.
    \10\ Massachusetts's February 9, 2018 certification of adequacy
that the SIP meets the NNSR requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS
relies on the inclusion of the SIP revisions proposed for approval
in Section I of this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 3, 2017, the EPA found that 15 states (including the
Commonwealth of Massachusetts) and the District of Columbia failed to
submit SIP revisions in a timely manner to satisfy certain requirements
for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS that apply to nonattainment areas and/
or states in the ozone transport region.\11\ See 82 FR 9158. As
explained in that rulemaking action, consistent with the CAA and EPA
regulations, these findings of failure to submit established certain
deadlines for the imposition of sanctions if a state does not submit a
timely SIP revision addressing the requirements for which the finding
is being made, and for the EPA to promulgate a federal implementation
plan (FIP) to address any outstanding SIP requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ States have three years after the effective date of
designation for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS to submit SIP revisions
addressing NNSR for their nonattainment areas. See 40 CFR 51.1114.
Massachusetts's SIP revision certified that its SIP-approved state
regulation addressing nonattainment new source review for all new
stationary sources and modified existing stationary sources in the
State exceeds the requirements of section 182(a)(2)(C) for the 2008
8-hour ozone NAAQS. However, EPA does not believe that the two-year
deadline contained in CAA section 182(a)(2)(C) applies to NNSR SIP
revisions for implementing the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. See 80 FR 12264,
12267 (March 6, 2015); 70 FR 71612, 71683 (November 29, 2005). The
submission of NNSR SIPs due on November 15, 1992, satisfied the
requirement for states to submit NNSR SIP revisions to meet the
requirements of CAA sections 172(c)(5) and 173 within two years
after the date of enactment of the 1990 CAA Amendments. Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    MassDEP submitted its February 9, 2018 SIP revision to address the
specific NNSR requirements for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS, located in
40 CFR 51.160-165, as well as its obligations under the EPA's February
3, 2017 Findings of Failure to Submit. The 18-month sanctions clock
stopped when MassDEP submitted the SIP revision and the SIP revision
became complete by operation of law on August 9, 2018. The EPA's
analysis of how this SIP revision addresses the NNSR requirements for
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS is provided in Section II.B.

B. Analysis of Massachusetts's NNSR Requirements

    The minimum SIP requirements for NNSR permitting programs for the
2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS are located in 40 CFR 51.165. These NNSR
program requirements include those promulgated in the ``Phase 2 Rule''
implementing the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS \12\ and the SIP Requirements
Rule implementing the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Under the Phase 2 Rule,
the SIP for each ozone nonattainment area must contain NNSR provisions
that: Set major source thresholds for NOX and VOCs pursuant
to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A)(1)(i) through (iv) and (2); classify
physical changes at a major source if the change would constitute a
major source by itself pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(iv)(A)(3);
consider any significant net emissions increase of NOX as a
significant net emissions increase for ozone pursuant to 40 CFR
51.165(a)(1)(v)(E); consider increases of VOCs emissions in extreme
ozone nonattainment areas as significant net emissions increases and
major modifications for ozone pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v)(F);
set significant emissions rates for VOCs and NOX as ozone
precursors pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(x)(A) through (C) and (E);
contain provisions for emissions reductions credits pursuant to 40 CFR
51.165(a)(3)(ii)(C)(1) and (2); provide that the requirements
applicable to VOCs also apply to NOX pursuant to 40 CFR
51.165(a)(8); and set offset ratios for VOCs and NOX
pursuant to 40 CFR 51.165(a)(9)(i) through (iii) (renumbered as
(a)(9)(ii) through (iv) under the SIP Requirements Rule for the 2008 8-
hour ozone NAAQS). Under the SIP Requirements Rule for the 2008 8-hour
ozone NAAQS, the SIP for each ozone nonattainment area designated
nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS and designated
nonattainment for the 1997 ozone NAAQS on April 6, 2015, must also
contain NNSR provisions that include the anti-backsliding requirements
at 40 CFR 51.1105.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See 70 FR 71612 (November 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Massachusetts's longstanding SIP-approved NNSR program, established
in the Code of Massachusetts Regulations (CMR) at Appendix A to 310 CMR
7.00, applies to the construction and modification of stationary
sources, including major stationary sources in nonattainment areas. In
its SIP revision, Massachusetts certifies that its existing NNSR
regulations at 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix A satisfy the requirements of
Section 182(a) of the CAA for the 2008 ozone NAAQS as specified in 40
CFR 51.165 for the Dukes County nonattainment area (see footnote 9).
    The EPA last approved revisions to the SIP-approved version of
Massachusetts's NNSR rule in 2000, addressing, among other things,
revisions under the 1990 CAA amendments and other general NNSR
permitting requirements. See 65 FR 64360 (October 27, 2000).
Massachusetts's SIP-approved NNSR regulations retain the NNSR
requirements applicable to serious nonattainment areas, even though the
Dukes County nonattainment area was classified as marginal
nonattainment under the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. Dukes County was
previously classified serious nonattainment as part of the Boston-
Lawrence-Worcester (E. Mass) nonattainment area on November 15, 1990
for the 1-hour ozone NAAQS. See 56 FR 56694 (November 6, 1991).
    Massachusetts's existing NNSR regulations and the revisions
proposed in the February 9, 2018 SIP submittal for inclusion in the SIP
are at least as stringent as the federal NNSR requirements and satisfy
the requirements of the Phase 2 Rule and SIP Requirements Rule
discussed previously. The definitions of ``major modification,''
``major stationary source,'' ``significant,'' and ``nonattainment
pollutant'' in 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix A are consistent with federal
NNSR regulations. In addition, the definition of ``major stationary
source'' and ``major modification'' properly address the thresholds for
VOCs and NOX, as precursors to ozone, by establishing the
threshold for each of these ozone precursors at 50 tons per year. This
threshold for a major modification is consistent with the EPA
regulations for serious nonattainment areas. Massachusetts's NNSR
regulations also contain the appropriate provisions for determining
emissions reduction credits due to shutdowns, establishing offset
ratios, and treating NOX as a precursor to ozone. Lastly,
since Massachusetts's NNSR SIP retains the NOX and VOCs
thresholds for a serious nonattainment area for ozone that are based on
how the Commonwealth was designated nonattainment on November 15, 1990
for the 1-hour ozone standard, the Commonwealth's SIP meets the anti-
backsliding requirements.
    The EPA notes that neither 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix A nor
Massachusetts's approved SIP have the regulatory provision for any
emissions change of VOCs in extreme nonattainment areas, specified in
40 CFR 51.165(a)(1)(v)(F), because Massachusetts has never had an

area designated extreme nonattainment for any of the ozone NAAQS. The
Massachusetts SIP is not required to have this provision for VOCs in
extreme nonattainment areas until such time as Massachusetts has an
extreme ozone nonattainment area.

III. Proposed Action

    The EPA's review of MassDEP's February 9, 2018 SIP submittal
indicates that the submittal satisfies the requirements of the CAA and
is appropriate for inclusion into the SIP. The EPA therefore is
proposing to approve the SIP revisions discussed in this action. Also,
as a result of our proposed approval of the NNSR permitting revisions
discussed in Section I, the EPA is proposing to convert the December
21, 2016 conditional approval to a full approval for prong 3 of CAA
section 110(a)(2)(D)(i)(II). Other aspects of EPA's December 21, 2016
conditional approval will be addressed in other actions.
    The EPA is also proposing to approve MassDEP's February 9, 2018 SIP
revision addressing the NNSR requirements for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for
the Dukes County Nonattainment Area. The EPA has concluded that
MassDEP's submission fulfills the 40 CFR 51.1114 revision requirement,
meets the requirements of CAA sections 110 and 172 and the minimum SIP
requirements of 40 CFR 51.165, as well as its obligations under the
EPA's February 3, 2017 Findings of Failure to Submit relating to
submission of a NNSR certification. The EPA is soliciting public
comments on the issues discussed in this action or on other relevant
matters. These comments will be considered before taking final action.
Interested parties may participate in the Federal rulemaking procedure
by submitting written comments to this proposed rulemaking by following
the instructions listed in the ADDRESSES section of this Federal
Register.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference of Massachusetts's 310 CMR 7.00: Appendix A. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available
through https://www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 1 Office
(please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this proposed action merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     This action is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action because this action is not significant under
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: February 7, 2019.
Deborah Szaro,
Acting Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2019-02203 Filed 2-13-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44397-44398]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20249]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC17-180-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corporation, AEP West
Virginia Transmission Company, Inc.
    Description: Application Under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act
to Acquire Transmission Facilities and Request for Certain Waivers of
American Electric Power Service Corporation, et al.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5074.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: EC17-181-000.
    Applicants: Rock Creek Wind Project, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act, Request for Expedited Consideration and Confidential
Treatment of Rock Creek Wind Project, LLC.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5079.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER17-437-005.
    Applicants: Marcus Hook 50, L.P.
    Description: Report Filing: Refund report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 9/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20170914-5061.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/5/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2214-001.
    Applicants: Great Valley Solar 2, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Great Valley Solar 2, LLC Amended
Certificate of Concurrence to SFA to be effective 10/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5069.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2215-001.
    Applicants: Great Valley Solar 2, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Great Valley Solar 2, LLC Amended
Certificate of Concurrence to LGIA CTA to be effective 10/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2417-001.
    Applicants: Great Valley Solar 3, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Great Valley Solar 3, LLC Amendment
to Certificate of Concurrence to LGIA CTA to be effective 10/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2418-001.
    Applicants: Great Valley Solar 3, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Great Valley Solar 3, LLC Amendment
to Certificate of Concurrence to SFA to be effective 10/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5076.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/22/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2476-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power DC, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20170914-5146.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/5/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2477-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power MD, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20170914-5147.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/5/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2478-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power NH, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 9/14/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20170914-5148.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/5/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2479-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power OH, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2480-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power RI, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2481-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power MA, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.

    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5002.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2482-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power NJ, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5003.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2483-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power VA, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5004.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2484-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power CT, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Services to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5005.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2485-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power MI, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5006.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2486-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power NY, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5007.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2487-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power ME, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5008.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2488-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power IL, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Sales to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5009.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2489-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Arizona Public Service Company submits notification of
an Umbrella Attachment A-1, in connection with certain Service
Agreements and APS contract.
    Filed Date: 9/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20170913-5137.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/4/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2490-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power CA, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Ancillary Services to be
effective 11/13/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5010.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2491-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2017-09-15_SA 3048
Washington Parish-Entergy GIA (J792) to be effective 8/31/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5022.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2492-000.
    Applicants: Florey Knob Energy LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Florey Knob Energy LLC MBR
Filing to be effective 11/16/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES17-57-000.
    Applicants: Interstate Power and Light Company.
    Description: Application for Authorization to Issue Securities and
Request for Waiver of Competitive Bidding Requirements of Interstate
Power and Light Company.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5082.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 15, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-20249 Filed 9-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 82 (Monday, April 29, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 18019]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08573]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-ORD-2015-0659; FRL-9990-91-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Generic Clearance for Citizen Science and
Crowdsourcing Projects (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), Generic Clearance for Citizen
Science and Crowdsourcing Projects (EPA ICR Number 2521.15, OMB Control
Number 2080-0083) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act.
This is a request for approval of a collection scheduled to expire on
April 30, 2019. Public comments were previously requested via the
Federal Register on December 27, 2018 during a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A
fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated
burden and cost to the public. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and
a person is not required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before May 29, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
ORD-2015-0659 to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to
[email protected]. Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Generic Clearance for Citizen Science
and Crowdsourcing Projects (Renewal), IOAA-ORD, Mail Code 8101R,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: EPA relies on scientific information. Citizen science and
crowdsourcing techniques will allow the Agency to collect qualitative
and quantitative data that might help inform scientific research,
assessments, or environmental screening; validate environmental models
or tools; or enhance the quantity and quality of data collected across
the country's diverse communities and ecosystems to support the
Agency's mission. Information gathered under this generic clearance
will be used by the Agency to support the activities listed above and
might provide unprecedented avenues for conducting breakthrough
research. Collections under this generic ICR will be from participants
who actively seek to participate on their own initiative through an
open and transparent process (the Agency does not select participants
or require participation); the collections will be low-burden for
participants; collections will be low-cost for both the participants
and the Federal Government; and data will be available to support the
scientific research (including assessments, environmental screening,
tools, models, etc.) of the Agency, states, tribal or local entities
where data collection occurs. EPA may, by virtue of collaborating with
non-federal entities, sponsor the collection of this type of
information in connection with citizen science projects. When
applicable, all such collections will accord with Agency policies and
regulations related to human subjects research and will follow the
established approval paths through EPA's Human Subjects Research Review
Official. Finally, personally identifiable information (PII) will only
be collected when necessary and in accordance with applicable federal
procedures and policies. If a new collection is not within the
parameters of this generic ICR, the Agency will submit a separate
information collection request to OMB for approval.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Participants/respondents will be
individuals, not specific entities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary.
    Estimated number of respondents: 17,500 (total).
    Frequency of response: The frequency of responses will range from
once to on occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 389,083 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $13,784,949 (per year), includes $525,000
annualized capital for operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in the estimates.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2019-08573 Filed 4-26-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: March 4, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 43)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 11527-11528]
[DOCID:fr04mr08-3]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0202; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-185-AD;
Amendment 39-15399; AD 2008-05-05]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, 737-700, 737-
700C, 737-800, and 737-900 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 737-600, 737-700, 737-700C, 737-800, and 737-900 series
airplanes. This AD requires an inspection of the vertical fin lugs,
skin, and skin edges for discrepancies; an inspection of the flight
control cables, fittings, and pulleys in section 48 for signs of
corrosion; an inspection of the horizontal stabilizer jackscrew, ball
nut, and gimbal pins for signs of corrosion; and corrective actions if
necessary. This AD results from reports indicating that moisture was
found within the section 48 cavity. We are issuing this AD to ensure
that the correct amount of sealant was applied around the vertical fin
lugs, skin and the skin edges. Missing sealant could result in icing of
the elevator cables, which could cause a system jam and corrosion of
structural and flight control parts, resulting in reduced
controllability of the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective April 8, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of April 8,
2008.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wayne Lockett, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6447; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an airworthiness directive (AD) that would apply to
certain Boeing Model 737-600, 737-700, 737-700C, 737-800, and 737-900
series airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on
November 19, 2007 (72 FR 64955). That NPRM proposed to require an
inspection of the vertical fin lugs, skin, and skin edges for
discrepancies; an inspection of the flight control cables, fittings,
and pulleys in section 48 for signs of corrosion; an inspection of the
horizontal stabilizer jackscrew, ball nut, and gimbal pins for signs of
corrosion; and corrective actions if necessary.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received. Boeing, the single
commenter, supports the NPRM.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    There are 829 airplanes of the affected design in the worldwide
fleet. This AD affects about 372 airplanes of U.S. registry. The
required actions take about 1 work hour per airplane, at an average
labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the estimated
cost of this AD for U.S. operators is $29,760, or $80 per airplane.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
Requirements.'' Under that

section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices,
methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in
air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2008-05-05 Boeing: Amendment 39-15399. Docket No. FAA-2007-0202;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-185-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective April 8,
2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to certain Boeing Model 737-600, 737-700,
737-700C, 737-800, and 737-900 series airplanes, certificated in any
category; as identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1242,
Revision 2, dated April 23, 2007.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports indicating that moisture was
found within the section 48 cavity. We are issuing this AD to ensure
that the correct amount of sealant was applied around the vertical
fin lugs, skin and the skin edges. Missing sealant could result in
icing of the elevator cables, which could cause a system jam and
corrosion of structural and flight control parts, resulting in
reduced controllability of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Inspections

    (f) Within 2,500 flight cycles or 18 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first, do the detailed inspections
specified in paragraphs (f)(1), (f)(2), and (f)(3) of this AD in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 737-53A1242, Revision 2, dated April 23, 2007.
    (1) Do a detailed inspection of the vertical fin lugs, skin, and
skin edges for discrepancies (i.e., water ingress; corrosion damage;
and missing, insufficient, or cracked sealant).
    (2) Do a detailed inspection of the flight control cables,
fittings, and pulleys in section 48 for signs of corrosion.
    (3) Do a detailed inspection of the horizontal stabilizer
jackscrew, ball nut, and gimbal pins for signs of corrosion.

    Note 1: For the purposes of this AD, a detailed inspection is:
``An intensive visual examination of a specific structural area,
system, installation, or assembly to detect damage, failure, or
irregularity. Available lighting is normally supplemented with a
direct source of good lighting at intensity deemed appropriate by
the inspector (i.e., the person performing the inspection).
Inspection aids such as mirror, magnifying lenses, etc., may be
used. Surface cleaning and elaborate access procedures may be
required.''

Corrective Actions

    (g) If any discrepancy or corrosion is found during any
inspection required by paragraph (f) of this AD, before further
flight, do the applicable corrective actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1242,
Revision 2, dated April 23, 2007; except where the service bulletin
specifies to contact Boeing, repair using a method approved in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.

Credit for Actions Done Using the Previous Service Information

    (h) Actions accomplished before the effective date of this AD in
accordance with Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1242, dated October
17, 2002; or Revision 1, dated April 28, 2005; are considered
acceptable for compliance with the corresponding actions specified
in paragraphs (f) and (g) of this AD.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (i)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested in
accordance with the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane, and the approval must specifically refer to this
AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (j) You must use Boeing Service Bulletin 737-53A1242, Revision
2, dated April 23, 2007, to do the actions required by this AD,
unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington; or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 20, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-3821 Filed 3-3-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:A 75 day comment period is insufficient time for the vaping industry and the wider vaping community to comment on the proposed deeming regulations. I would respectfully request that the period for comment be extended to 180 days.

Please do not just twist this so that it all goes to big tobacco and almost every small business owner in this industry goes out of business. I'm over 2 years smoke free now thanks to a local shop in my small rural town of all places.