[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 150 (Thursday, August 4, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51453-51455]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18508]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket Nos. FDA-2016-M-1122, FDA-2016-M-1123, FDA-2016-M-1124, FDA-
2016-M-1125, FDA-2016-M-1165, FDA-2016-M-1166, FDA-2016-M-1167, FDA-
2016-M-1168, FDA-2016-M-1222, FDA-2016-M-1223, FDA-2016-M-1400, FDA-
2016-M-1401, FDA-2016-M-1455, FDA-2016-M-1459, FDA-2016-M-1754, and
FDA-2016-M-1755]

Medical Devices; Availability of Safety and Effectiveness
Summaries for Premarket Approval Applications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is publishing a list of
premarket approval applications

(PMAs) that have been approved. This list is intended to inform the
public of the availability of safety and effectiveness summaries of
approved PMAs through the Internet and the Agency's Division of Dockets
Management.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to http://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket Nos.
FDA-2016-M-1122, FDA-2016-M-1123, FDA-2016-M-1124, FDA-2016-M-1125,
FDA-2016-M-1165, FDA-2016-M-1166, FDA-2016-M-1167, FDA-2016-M-1168,
FDA-2016-M-1222, FDA-2016-M-1223, FDA-2016-M-1400, FDA-2016-M-1401,
FDA-2016-M-1455, FDA-2016-M-1459, FDA-2016-M-1754, and FDA-2016-M-1755
for ``Medical Devices; Availability of Safety and Effectiveness
Summaries for Premarket Approval Applications.'' Received comments will
be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as
``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on http://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joshua Nipper, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, Rm. 1650, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In accordance with section 515(d)(4) and (e)(2) of the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) (21 U.S.C. 360e(d)(4) and
(e)(2)), notification of an order approving, denying, or withdrawing
approval of a PMA will continue to include a notice of opportunity to
request review of the order under section 515(g) of the FD&C Act. The
30-day period for requesting reconsideration of an FDA action under
Sec.  10.33(b) (21 CFR 10.33(b)) for notices announcing approval of a
PMA begins on the day the notice is placed on the Internet. Section
10.33(b) provides that FDA may, for good cause, extend this 30-day
period. Reconsideration of a denial or withdrawal of approval of a PMA
may be sought only by the applicant; in these cases, the 30-day period
will begin when the applicant is notified by FDA in writing of its
decision.
    The regulations provide that FDA publish a quarterly list of
available safety and effectiveness summaries of PMA approvals and
denials that were announced during that quarter. The following is a
list of approved PMAs for which summaries of safety and effectiveness
were placed on the Internet from April 1, 2016, through June 30, 2016.
There were no denial actions during this period. The list provides the
manufacturer's name, the product's generic name or the trade name, and
the approval date.

Table 1--List of Safety and Effectiveness Summaries for Approved PMAs Made Available From April 1, 2016, Through
                                                  June 30, 2016
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
           PMA No., Docket No.                     Applicant                  Trade name           Approval date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P100044/S018, FDA-2016-M-1123...........  Intersect ENT.............  PROPEL[supreg] Mini Sinus        3/23/2016
                                                                       Implant.
P150028, FDA-2016-M-1122................  NuMed, Inc................  Cheatham Platinum Stent          3/25/2016
                                                                       System.
P150026, FDA-2016-M-1124................  Cardiofocus, Inc..........  HeartLight Endoscopic             4/1/2016
                                                                       Ablation System.

P150033, FDA-2016-M-1125................  Medtronic, Inc............  Medtronic MicraTM                 4/6/2016
                                                                       Transcatheter Pacemaker
                                                                       System.
P140003/S005, FDA-2016-M-1165...........  Abiomed, Inc..............  Impella Left Ventricular          4/7/2016
                                                                       Support System.
P150041, FDA-2016-M-1167................  Abbott Molecular, Inc.....  Vysis CLL FISH Probe Kit..       4/11/2016
P150016, FDA-2016-M-1166................  Neomend, Inc..............  TRIDYNETM Vascular Sealant       4/11/2016
P130001, FDA-2016-M-1168................  Epigenomics AG............  Epi proColon..............       4/12/2016
P150012, FDA-2016-M-1222................  Boston Scientific           ImageReady MR Conditional        4/25/2016
                                           Corporation.                Pacing System and
                                                                       Ingevity Pace/Sense Lead.
P130029/S002, FDA-2016-M-1223...........  Bard Peripheral Vascular,   Fluency[supreg] Plus             4/26/2016
                                           Inc.                        Endovascular Stent Graft.
P160002, FDA-2016-M-1400................  Ventana Medical Systems,    VENTANA PD-L1(SP142) Assay       5/18/2016
                                           Inc.
P070014/S037, FDA-2016-M-1455...........  Bard Peripheral Vascular,   Bard[supreg] LifeStent           5/31/2016
                                           Inc.                        Vascular Stent System.
P110033/S018, FDA-2016-M-1401...........  Allergan..................  JUV[Eacute]DERM                  5/31/2016
                                                                       VOLBELLA[supreg] XC.
P150047, FDA-2016-M-1459................  Roche Molecular Systems,    cobas[supreg] EGFR                6/1/2016
                                           Inc.                        Mutation Test v2.
P150024, FDA-2016-M-1754................  Aspire Bariatrics, Inc....  AspireAssist[supreg]......       6/14/2016
P150029, FDA-2016-M-1755................  Medtronic Minimed, Inc....  iPro2 Continuous Glucose         6/17/2016
                                                                       Monitoring System With
                                                                       Enlite Sensor.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the documents at
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/DeviceApprovalsandClearances/PMAApprovals/default.htm.

    Dated: August 1, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-18508 Filed 8-3-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: July 27, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 143)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 43801-43803]
[DOCID:fr27jy10-2]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0721; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-56-AD;
Amendment 39-16370; AD 2010-15-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Eurocopter France (ECF) Model EC225LP
Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
specified ECF Model EC225LP helicopters. This AD results from a
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) AD issued by the
aviation authority of the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Community.
The MCAI AD states there have been a ``few'' reports of cracks and
failure of the main rotor hub (MRH) cone restrainer support lugs at
their attachment points on the reinforcement ring where the dome
fairing is secured. Also, cracks on the dome fairing support have been
reported. Failure of the cone restrainer support or the dome fairing
support attachment lugs may lead to loss of the dome fairing, damage to
the rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

DATES: This AD becomes effective on August 11, 2010.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 11, 2010.
    We must receive comments on this AD by September 27, 2010.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting your
comments electronically.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    You may get the service information identified in this AD from
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75053-4005, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at http://
www.eurocopter.com.
    Examining the Docket: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the Docket Operations
office between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the economic evaluation, any
comments received, and other information. The street address for the
Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is stated in the
ADDRESSES section of this AD. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Gary Roach,
ASW-111, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate, Regulations
and Guidance Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas 76137,
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA AD 2009-0024, dated February 20,
2009, to correct an unsafe condition for the Eurocopter Model EC225LP
helicopters.
    The MCAI AD states there have been a ``few'' reports of cracks and
failure of the MRH cone restrainer support lugs in the area of their
attachment points on the reinforcement ring where the dome fairing is
secured. Also, cracks on the dome fairing support have been reported.
Failure of the cone restrainer support or the dome fairing support
attachment lugs may lead to loss of the dome fairing, damage to the
rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter or
injury to persons on the ground.
    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI AD and any
related service information in the AD docket.

Related Service Information

    Eurocopter has issued one Emergency Alert Service Bulletin (EASB)
No. 05A003, Revision 2, dated February 3, 2009 (EASB No. 05A003) for
two different helicopters: the Model EC225LP and the military Model
EC725AP, a non-FAA type certificated helicopter. Eurocopter has also
issued EASB No. 62-007, dated July 10, 2009 (SB 62-007), which
corresponds to MOD 0743718. EASB 05A003 specifies checking the MRH in
the area of the cone restrainer support attachment lugs and the dome
fairing support attachment lugs for a crack. If a crack is found in one
of the five lugs of the cone restrainer support or the dome fairing
support, the EASB specifies complying with SB 62-007 before further
flight. SB 62-007 specifies modifying the MRH by replacing the cone
restrainer support and the dome fairing support, reidentifying those
parts and balancing the main rotor blades if they were removed. The
actions described in the MCAI AD are intended to correct the unsafe
condition identified in the service information.

FAA's Evaluation and Unsafe Condition Determination

    This helicopter has been approved by the aviation authority of
France and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
our bilateral agreement with France, EASA, their Technical Agent, has
notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI AD. We are
issuing this AD because we evaluated all information provided by EASA
and determined the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other helicopters of this same type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI AD

    We do not specify dates because the dates have already passed nor
do we specify the compliance time in days but rather only in hours
time-in-service (TIS). We also use a different compliance time. Also,
we use inspect rather than check when referring to an action required
by a mechanic as opposed to a pilot.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 4 helicopters of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it will take about 30 work-hours per
helicopter to inspect and modify the MRH. The average labor rate is $85
per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $18,981 per helicopter.
Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S.
operators will be $86,124, assuming a crack is found in each MRH cone
restrainer support or dome fairing support attachment lugs.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this

AD. We find that the risk to the flying public justifies waiving notice
and comment prior to adoption of this rule because of the short
compliance time of 15 hours TIS to conduct the inspection for a crack
in the attachment lugs. Failure of these lugs could result in loss of
control of the helicopter. Therefore, we have determined that notice
and opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are
impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in fewer than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. However, we invite you to send us any written data, views, or
arguments concerning this AD. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section of this AD. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-
0721; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-56-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to  http://
www.regulations.gov including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on product(s) identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    Therefore, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new Airworthiness
Directive (AD):

2010-15-04 EUROCOPTER FRANCE: Amendment 39-16370. Docket No. FAA-
2010-0721; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-57-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective on August 11, 2010.

Other Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Model EC225LP helicopters, except those
that have been modified with MOD 0743718, certificated in any
category.

Reason

    (d) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) AD
states there have been a ``few'' reports of cracks and failure of
the main rotor hub (MRH) cone restrainer support lugs at their
attachment points on the reinforcement ring where the dome fairing
is secured. Also, cracks on the dome fairing support have been
reported. Failure of the cone restrainer support or the dome fairing
support attachment lugs may lead to loss of the dome fairing, damage
to the rotor blades, and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.

Actions and Compliance

    (e) Required as indicated:
    (1) Within 15 hours time-in-service (TIS), unless already done,
and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 15 hours TIS, visually
inspect for a crack in the area of the attachment points on the MRH
reinforcement ring of the lugs securing the cone restrainer support
and also of the lugs securing the dome fairing support as depicted
in Figures 1 and 2 of Eurocopter Emergency Alert Service Bulletin
No. 05A003, Revision 2, dated February 3, 2009 (EASB No. 05A003) and
by following the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 2.B.1, of
EASB No. 05A003.

    Note:  The one EASB No. 05A003 applies to two different model
helicopters: Eurocopter Model EC225LP helicopters that are type-
certificated in the United States and Eurocopter Model EC725AP
military helicopters that are not type-certificated in the United
States.

    (2) If a crack is found in the area of any of the lugs of the
cone restrainer support or the dome fairing support, as depicted in
Figures 1 and 2 of EASB No. 05A003, before further flight, modify
the MRH by replacing both the cone restrainer support and the dome
fairing support assembly by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraphs 2.B.1. and 2.B.2., reidentify the cone
restrainer support and dome fairing assembly by following paragraph
2.D., and if removed, track and balance the main rotor blades by
following paragraph 3.B.3. of Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 62-
007, Revision 1, dated July 10, 2009.
    (f) Replacing and reidentifying both the cone restrainer support
and the dome fairing support assembly in accordance with paragraph
(e)(2) of this AD constitutes terminating action for the
requirements of this AD.

Differences Between this AD and the MCAI AD

    (g) We do not specify dates because the dates are already passed
nor do we specify the time in days but rather only in hours TIS. We
also use a different initial compliance time. Also, we use inspect
rather than check when referring to an action required by a mechanic
as opposed to a pilot.

Other Information

    (h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Safety Management Group, ATTN: DOT/FAA Southwest Region, Gary Roach,
ASW-111, Aviation Safety Engineer, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Regulations and Guidance Group, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth,
Texas 76137, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested, using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

    (i) A special flight permit may be issued to ferry the
helicopter to a location where the modification can be done,
provided the dome fairing and its attachment screws are removed.
When allowing flight with the dome fairing removed, the special
flight permit must contain information that alerts the flight crew
that when flying without the dome fairing, the lateral vibrations of
the helicopter significantly increase at speeds of 70 to 120 knots.
These lateral vibrations do not affect flight safety.

Related Information

    (j) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Airworthiness
Directive No. 2009-0024, dated February 20, 2009, contains related
information.

Joint Aircraft System/Component (JASC) Code

    (k) The JASC Code is 6220: Main Rotor Head.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (l) You must use the specified portions of Eurocopter Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin No. 05A003, Revision 2, dated February 3,
2009, and Eurocopter Service Bulletin No. 62-007, Revision 1, dated
July 10, 2009, to do the actions required.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
American Eurocopter Corporation, 2701 Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75053-4005, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
http://www.eurocopter.com.
    (3) You may review copies at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, Texas,
76137; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on July 13, 2010.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-17757 Filed 7-26-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 2, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51988-51989]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20758]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13701-002]

FFP Missouri 2, LLC; Notice of Application Accepted for Filing,
Soliciting Motions To Intervene and Protests, and Other Agency
Authorizations

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Original Major License--Existing Dam.
    b. Project No.: 13701-002.
    c. Date filed: November 13, 2013.
    d. Applicant: FFP Missouri 2, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Sardis Lake Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The proposed project would be located at the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers' (Corps) existing Sardis Lake Dam, on the Little
Tallahatchie River, near the Town of Sardis, Panola County,
Mississippi. The proposed project would occupy approximately 59 acres
of federal lands administered by the Corps.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Thomas Feldman, Vice President, Project
Development, Free Flow Power Corporation, 239 Causeway Street, Suite
300, Boston, MA 02114;<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contacts: Jeanne Edwards at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Patti Leppert at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. The deadline for filing motions to intervene and protests is 60
days from the issuance date of this notice.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
motions to intervene and protests and requests for cooperating agency
status using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief comments up to
6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the eComment system
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your
name and contact information at the end of your comments. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-13701-002.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents

with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each person on
the official service list for the project. Further, if an intervenor
files comments or documents with the Commission relating to the merits
of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a particular
resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document on that
resource agency.
    k. This application has been accepted, but is not ready for
environmental analysis at this time.
    l. The proposed project would utilize the Corps' existing Sardis
Lake Dam outlet works, consisting of a concrete conduit outlet tunnel,
regulating gates, and a stilling basin. The project would operate
consistent with the Corps' current operation policy.
    The proposed project would consist of the following new facilities:
(1) A 510-foot-long, 15.5-foot-diameter steel liner installed within
the Corps' existing concrete outlet tunnel; (2) a 50-foot-long, 30-
foot-wide steel-lined concrete bifurcation at the end of the Corps'
existing conduit to divide the flows between the Corps' existing
stilling basin and the project new powerhouse; (3) a 250-foot-long,
15.5-foot-diameter steel penstock; (4) an 102.6-foot-high by 78-foot-
wide by 50-foot-deep forebay; (5) a 120-foot-long by 85-foot-wide
concrete powerhouse with two vertical Kaplan generating units with a
total installed capacity of 14.6 megawatts; (6) a 200-foot-long, 100-
foot-wide tailrace channel; (7) a substation; (8) a 7,097-foot-long
transmission line consisting of a 887-foot-long, 4.160 kilovolt (kV)
buried line from the powerhouse to the substation and a 6,210-foot-
long, 161 kV overhead line from the substation to an existing utility-
owned distribution line; and (9) appurtenant facilities. The project
would have an estimated average annual generation of 52.0 gigawatt-
hours.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.FERC.gov, using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field, to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support. A copy is available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in item h above.
    Register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    n. Any qualified applicant desiring to file a competing application
must submit to the Commission, on or before the specified intervention
deadline date, a competing development application, or a notice of
intent to file such an application. Submission of a timely notice of
intent allows an interested person to file the competing development
application no later than 120 days after the specified intervention
deadline date. Applications for preliminary permits will not be
accepted in response to this notice.
    A notice of intent must specify the exact name, business address,
and telephone number of the prospective applicant, and must include an
unequivocal statement of intent to submit a development application. A
notice of intent must be served on the applicant(s) named in this
public notice.
    o. Anyone may submit a protest, or a motion to intervene in
accordance with the requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18
CFR 385.210, 385.211, and 385.214. In determining the appropriate
action to take, the Commission will consider all protests filed, but
only those who file a motion to intervene in accordance with the
Commission's Rules may become a party to the proceeding. Any protests
or motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
deadline date for the particular application.
    All filings must: (1) Bear in all capital letters the title
``PROTEST,'' or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE,'' ``NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE
COMPETING APPLICATION,'' or ``COMPETING APPLICATION;'' (2) set forth in
the heading the name of the applicant and the project number of the
application to which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name,
address, and telephone number of the person protesting or intervening;
and (4) otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001
through 385.2005. Agencies may obtain copies of the application
directly from the applicant. A copy of any protest or motion to
intervene must be served upon the representative of the applicant.
    p. Procedural schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the schedule
will be made as appropriate.

Issue Notice of Acceptance--August 2014
Issue Scoping Document 1 for comments--October 2014
Comments on Scoping Document 1--November 2014
Issue Scoping Document 2 (if necessary)--December 2014
Issue notice of ready for environmental analysis--December 2014
Commission issues EA or draft EA--September 2015
Comments on EA or draft EA--October 2015
Commission issues final EA (if necessary)--April 2016

    q. Other Agency Authorizations: Pursuant to section 401 of the
Clean Water Act, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality
(Mississippi DEQ) must certify that discharge from the construction and
operation of this proposed project will comply with the Clean Water
Act. The Mississippi DEQ is also reviewing the project application
under Title 11 Miss. Admin. Code, Pt. 6, Ch.1, Subch.3, which
establishes the review of water quality certification applications.
Based on an understanding between the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC) and the Mississippi DEQ, this public notice is also
issued for the purpose of advising all interested persons that there is
a decision pending before the Mississippi Environmental Quality Permit
Board on the request for section 401 water quality certification for
this FERC license application. Any comments concerning the water
quality certification request may be submitted to the Mississippi
Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Pollution Control at
Post Office Box 2261, Jackson, Mississippi 39225-2261. The public
comment period on the water quality certification extends 30 days from
the date of publication of this notice. A copy of the public notice
with a description of the project construction and operation is
available for review at the Mississippi DEQ's Jackson office. The
complete application may be reviewed at the address listed in paragraph
h.

    Dated: August 25, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-20758 Filed 8-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 224 (Thursday, November 19, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73816-73818]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25497]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90422; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2020-055]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Automate the Exchange's Process
for Initiating the Re-Opening of a Security Listed on the New York
Stock Exchange LLC Following the Resumption of Trading After a Halt,
Suspension, or Pause During the Early Trading Session, Pre-Opening
Session, or Post-Closing Session

November 13, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 5, 2020, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'' or the ``Exchange'') is filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') a
proposed rule change to automate the Exchange's current process for
initiating the re-opening of a security listed on the New York Stock
Exchange LLC following the resumption of trading after a halt,
suspension, or pause during the Early Trading Session, Pre-Opening
Session, or Post-Closing Session. The text of the proposed rule change
is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to automate the
Exchange's current process for initiating the re-opening of securities
listed on the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') following the
resumption of trading after a halt, suspension, or pause during the
Early Trading Session,\3\ Pre-Opening Session,\4\ or Post-Closing
Session.\5\ EDGX Rule 11.7 describes the Exchange's opening process for
securities listed on other national securities exchanges, including the
process for re-opening such securities following the resumption of
trading after a halt, suspension, or pause. Although the Exchange
generally employs an automated process for re-opening securities listed
on other exchanges, there are situations where manual intervention is
currently needed to initiate the Exchange's re-opening process.
Specifically, manual intervention is currently needed for the Exchange
to initiate its re-opening process in NYSE-listed securities that
resume trading after a halt, suspension, or pause when such resumption
of trading occurs outside of regular trading hours at times when the
Exchange is open for either pre- or post-market trading but NYSE does
not trade its listed securities. The proposed rule change would
implement an automated process for initiating the re-opening of trading
on the Exchange in these circumstances.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``Early Trading Session'' means the time between
7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. Eastern Time. See EDGX Rule 1.5(ii).
    \4\ The term ``Pre-Opening Session'' means the time between 8:00
a.m. and 9:30 a.m. Eastern Time. See EDGX Rule 1.5(s).
    \5\ The term ``Post-Closing Session'' means the time between
4:00 p.m. and 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time. See EDGX Rule 1.5(r).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Generally, the Exchange's re-opening process is designed to provide
an execution at the midpoint of the national best bid and offer
(``NBBO'') following the initiation of trading on the applicable
listing exchange. Specifically, as described in EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(1),
the Exchange's re-opening process occurs at the midpoint of the: (i)
First NBBO subsequent to the first reported trade and first two-sided
quotation on the listing exchange following the resumption of trading
after a halt, suspension, or pause; or (ii) then prevailing NBBO when
the first two-sided quotation published by the listing exchange
following the resumption of trading after a halt, suspension, or pause
if no first trade is reported by the listing exchange within one second
of publication of the first two-sided quotation by the listing
exchange. In either case, the Exchange must wait for the listing
exchange to commence trading before initiating its re-opening
procedures.
    NYSE operates two trading sessions each day: (1) The ``core trading
session'' between 9:30 a.m. ET to 4:00 p.m. ET, during which all
securities are available for trading; \6\ and (2) the ``early trading
session'' between 7:00 a.m. ET and the commencement of the core trading
session, during which only securities that trade via unlisted trading
privileges are available for trading.\7\ NYSE does not trade its listed
securities during its early trading session, i.e., prior to the
beginning of regular trading hours, nor does it trade any securities
after the end of regular trading hours. As a result, since the
Exchange's normal process for re-opening securities listed on other
exchanges after a halt, suspension, or pause requires trading to
commence on the listing exchange, the Exchange cannot use this process
for NYSE-listed securities that resume trading during the Early Trading
Session, Pre-Opening Session, or Post-Closing Session.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See NYSE Rule 7.34(a)(2). NYSE's core trading session for
its listed securities begins with its opening auction and ends with
its closing auction if one is conducted. Id.
    \7\ See NYSE Rule 7.34(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At the same time, EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(2) provides that where neither
of the conditions required for the initiation of the Exchange's
automated re-opening process have occurred, trading in the security may
be resumed on the Exchange at its discretion. The Exchange therefore
periodically invokes it authority pursuant to this rule to manually
initiate the resumption of trading in NYSE-listed securities outside of
regular trading hours.\8\ However, initiating trading on the Exchange
in this manner requires manual intervention by Exchange staff. The
Exchange believes that it would be in the interest of market
participants and investors to instead automate its process for
initiating trading in this

situation and avoid the need for manual intervention.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Exchange estimates that it currently invokes its
authority under this rule to manually initiate a re-opening in NYSE-
listed securities a handful of times each month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current Process for NYSE-Listed Securities Re-Opened in Pre- and Post-
Market
    As discussed, the Exchange currently employs a manual process to
initiate the resumption of trading in NYSE-listed securities outside of
regular trading hours. This manual process requires personnel from the
Exchange's Trade Desk to become aware of, and react to, NYSE's
determination to lift a trading halt in one of their listed
securities.\9\ Typically, this occurs in one of two ways. First, the
Trade Desk performs proactive monitoring of halt notifications from
NYSE and subsequent resumptions during the Post-Closing Trading
Session.\10\ If a security is halted by NYSE during regular trading,
Trade Desk personnel will monitor internal tools beginning at 4:00 p.m.
ET to identify whether NYSE has lifted the halt. Second, even with the
proactive monitoring performed by the Trade Desk, there may be
instances where the Exchange has not immediately initiated the manual
re-opening of a security that has resumed trading. In such
circumstances, Exchange members may reach out to the Trade Desk when
they notice that their orders are not reflected in the market. In
either case, Trade Desk personnel would check internal tools to confirm
that the security is no longer halted, and would routinely invoke the
authority described in the paragraph above to initiate the re-opening
process on the Exchange after identifying that there are quotes
available in the security on other exchanges. The Exchange believes
that this manual process is inefficient, and members have also reached
out to the Trade Desk with requests that the Exchange replace this
process with a more efficient automated process. As a result, the
Exchange is proposing to automate its process for initiating trading in
this situation to avoid the need for manual intervention by Exchange
staff.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Section 203.07 of NYSE's Listed Company Manual describes its
trading halt procedures, and provides NYSE with discretion to
declare a material news halts in its listed securities, as well as
to lift such a halt when it determines that trading should resume.
As a matter of practice, NYSE may exercise its discretion to lift a
trading halt in its listed securities outside of its own hours for
trading such securities. In that event, NYSE would disseminate a
resume message through the SIP, which would permit trading to resume
on other national securities exchanges, including the Exchange.
    \10\ Although it is possible for a resumption to take place in
the Early Trading and Pre-Opening Sessions, Trade Desk personnel do
not monitor for resumptions in those trading sessions as this
scenario normally occurs in the Post-Closing Trading Session.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Automated Process for Initiating the Exchange's Re-Opening
    As proposed, the Exchange would replace the manual process
described above with automated procedures that would automatically
resume trading after one second has passed following the Exchange's
receipt of the first NBBO following the resumption of trading after the
halt, suspension, or pause.\11\ This change would allow the Exchange to
avoid the need for Trade Desk staff to monitor for resumption messages,
and would allow members' orders to be automatically reflected in the
market, while continuing to ensure that the Exchange's re-opening is
tied to the existence of a market in the security on a national
securities exchange(s).\12\ With this change, the Exchange would
continue to re-open trading in NYSE-listed securities in the same
manner that it is able to under EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(2) today, but would
not have to rely on manual procedures for initiating the resumption of
trading. Specifically, rather than conducting the standard midpoint re-
opening described in EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(1) when the listing exchange has
not established a market in the security, the Exchange would continue
to follow the process described in EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(2), without the
need for manual intervention. Thus, as is the case following the manual
initiation of re-opening of trading in a security on the Exchange,
orders would be processed using the ``contingent open'' procedures
described in EDGX Rule 11.7(d), which provides that orders are to be
handled in time sequence and placed on the EDGX Book, routed,
cancelled, or executed in accordance with the terms of the order.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Exchange utilizes a combination of direct feeds and the
applicable securities information processor (``SIP'') feeds to
determine the NBBO in a security. See EDGX Rule 13.4. In addition,
such NBBO information, as well as applicable halt and resume
messages, are disseminated to market participants through the SIP
feeds during the pre- and post-market trading hours of all U.S.
equities exchanges.
    \12\ Pursuant to Regulation NMS, the NBBO in a given security is
established by the best bid and best offer in such security
calculated and disseminated on a current and continuing basis by a
plan processor pursuant to an effective national market system plan.
See 17 CFR 242.600(b)(43). As such, an NBBO may be established when
one or more national securities exchanges are disseminating
quotations in an equity security.
    \13\ See EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(2),(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the event that there is no available NBBO in the security, the
proposed automated procedures would not resume trading on the Exchange,
but the Exchange would retain the ability to manually resume trading at
its discretion pursuant to current EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(2). To increase
transparency around when the Exchange could invoke this discretion, the
Exchange proposes to amend EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(2) to specifically state
that the discretion provided pursuant to this rule applies when a
security has not otherwise been re-opened for trading on the Exchange
pursuant to Proposed EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(3). This change would not
substantively modify the scope of the discretion provided pursuant to
EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(2). However, the Exchange believes that modifying the
rule in this manner would serve to increase transparency by
specifically identifying the times when this discretion is not relevant
due to the fact that the Exchange has successfully re-opened the
security using its automated procedures.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\14\ in general, and
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\15\ in particular, in that it is designed
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest and not to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. Today, Trade Desk staff must
manually intervene to initiate the re-opening on the Exchange of NYSE-
listed securities following the resumption of trading after a halt,
suspension, or pause, if the security resumes trading during the Early
Trading Session, Pre-Opening Session, or Post-Closing Session. Although
NYSE may trade securities pursuant to unlisted trading privileges prior
to regular trading hours, it does not offer pre- or post-market trading
for its listed securities. Since the Exchange's current rules require
trading to have commenced on the primary listing market in order to
initiate the Exchange's automated process for re-opening securities
following a halt, suspension, or pause, the Exchange is forced to
periodically invoke manual procedures to resume trading these
securities pursuant to unlisted trading privileges. The Exchange
believes, however, that an automated process would be more consistent
and reliable for market participants and investors as such a process
would not rely on manual intervention by Trade Desk staff

before the Exchange can resume trading. In addition to generally
increasing efficiency of the re-opening process, the Exchange believes
that the proposed automated procedures would reduce the need for
members to contact the Trade Desk with questions about the status of
their orders. Further, such a process would be responsive to member
requests to improve on the inefficient manual process currently
employed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change would promote the public interest and the
protection of investors by eliminating the need for manual intervention
and replacing it with a more consistent procedure that would be applied
by its trading systems on an automated basis. The proposed change would
not impact the process by which the security would be re-opened, which
would continue to follow the ``contingent open'' procedures used today.
However, instead of relying on Trade Desk staff to manually re-open
trading in the security, trading would resume on the Exchange once one
second has passed following the Exchange's receipt of the first NBBO
following the resumption of trading after the halt, suspension, or
pause. This condition is designed to ensure that a market has been
established in the security prior to resuming trading on the Exchange,
and mirrors the steps that Trade Desk personnel would conduct today to
verify that there is a market in the security on one or more other
exchanges before manually initiating a re-opening. Specifically,
trading on the Exchange would not resume until one second after an NBBO
has been established in the security following the resumption of
quoting on at least one other national securities exchange. The
Exchange believes that resuming trading once this condition has been
satisfied would ensure that trading can be resumed in an automated and
efficient fashion, while also ensuring that the re-opening of trading
on the Exchange continues to be tied to the existence of an established
market in the security on one or more other exchanges in the absence of
trading on the primary listing market during the pre- and post-market.
In addition, the Exchange would continue to have the authority to
manually initiate the re-open of trading pursuant to EDGX Rule
11.7(e)(2), which would allow the Exchange to re-open trading in the
event that trading is not re-opened pursuant to its automated
procedures. The proposed amendments to EDGX Rule 11.7(e)(2) would
increase the transparency of that rule by specifically noting that this
discretion would be used when the Exchange is not otherwise able to re-
open trading in an automated fashion under its rules.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
designed to facilitate a more efficient re-opening process in
situations where the Exchange's current rules would require unnecessary
and inefficient manual intervention, and is not designed to address any
competitive issues. The Exchange therefore does not believe that the
proposed rule change would have any significant impact on competition.
Rather than impact the competitive environment, the proposed rule
change would benefit members and investors by eliminating the need for
manual intervention when initiating the Exchange's re-opening process
for NYSE-listed securities that resume trading during the Early Trading
Session, Pre-Opening Session, or Post-Closing Session.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received on the proposed rule
change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
    A. By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
    B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-055 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-055. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-055
and should be submitted on or before December 10, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-25497 Filed 11-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: January 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 7)]
[Notices]
[Page 1876]
[DOCID:fr10ja08-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-22-000]

Missouri River Energy Services; Western Minnesota Municipal Power
Agency; Notice of Filing

December 31, 2007.
    Take notice that on December 20, 2007, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2)
and Rule 2004 of the Rules of Practices and Procedure of the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) and 385.2004 (2006),
Missouri River Energy Services (MRES) and Western Minnesota Municipal
Power Agency (Western Minnesota) filed a petition for declaratory order
permitting MRES and Western Minnesota to combine their financial
information for purposes of the variances being sought by MRES to the
Attachment O transmission formula under the Midwest Independent
Transmission System Operator, Inc.'s Open Access Transmission and
Energy Markets Tariff. MRES and Western Minnesota also submit an
exemption of the application fee, pursuant to section 381.108 of the
Commission's Rules and Regulations.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on January 22, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary. Docket No. EL08-22-000 3
 [FR Doc. E8-236 Filed 1-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P