[Federal Register: November 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 211)]
[Notices]
[Page 67422-67423]
[DOCID:fr02no10-113]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63190; File No. SR-BX-2010-069]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Modify
Pricing for Co-Location Services

October 27, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 25, 2010, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by BX. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of
the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ BX has designated this
proposal as establishing or changing a due, fee, or other charge, which
renders the proposed rule change effective upon filing. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    BX proposes to codify [sic] pricing for co-location services. BX
will implement the proposed change immediately. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at http://
nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at BX's principal office, on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's
Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, BX included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. BX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to modify its fee schedule \5\ for co-
location services.\6\ These modifications are summarized below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ This schedule includes modifications made by SR-BX-2010-068,
filed with the Commission on October 14, 2010.
    \6\ Co-location services are a suite of hardware, power,
telecommunication and other ancillary products and services that
allow users to place their trading and communications equipment in
close physical proximity to the quoting and execution facilities of
the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    First, as a result of the entry of the Direct Edge and BATS Y
exchanges into the public market and the availability of other data
feeds, the Exchange is implementing and modifying its
telecommunications installation and connectivity fees to accommodate
these data linkages for co-located customers. The new fees are: (1)
$125 per-month fee for connectivity to the Arca Best Bid and Offer
feed; (2) a $1,500 per-month fee for connectivity to the new BATS Y
exchange; and (3) a one-time fee of $1000 for the installation of
telecommunications connectivity for the Direct Edge exchange, along
with a per-month fee of $2500 for each of its two markets, EDGA and
EDGX. In connection with foregoing, the Exchange notes that its
installation fee for Direct Edge is equal to that currently charged for
installation of SIAC, CME,\7\ and BATS connectivity, and that the
monthly rates proposed are based on the anticipated bandwidth needed to
accommodate a particular fee and are similar to connectivity fees
imposed by other vendors.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Exchange is also removing from the fee schedule an
incorrect duplicate $1000 installation fee for CME market data
connectivity.
    \8\ Separate fees for market data are charged independently by
individual markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Next, to provide additional flexibility for customers to select
only the equipment they need, the Exchange proposes to separate its
current combined $1750 installation fee for cooling fans and perforated
tiles into separate fees of $1,500 for the fans and $250 for the tiles.

    Further, in the area of providing internet bandwidth to users, the
Exchange, responding to decreased demand for lower-level bandwidth
options, is eliminating its current 256kb, 500kb, and1.5Mb options and
replacing them with new 3Mb, 4Mb, and 5Mb options priced at $700, $900,
and $1,100 per-month respectively.
    Finally, the Exchange is offering various services related to
hardware installation, security and storage including: a custom
installation fee, which will vary depending upon cost, for installing
customized equipment to meet individual customer needs; cabinet caging,
a metal security fencing option to protect customer equipment at a
monthly rate of $3,000, with installation fees individually determined
by the size and complexity of the equipment to be caged; and, lastly, a
monthly cabinet equipment storage fee in the amount of $500. This
storage fee differs from the equipment storage fee of $100 in the
current fee schedule, which relates to temporary storage of equipment
by the Exchange itself rather than in a customer controlled cabinet.
    As with all the Exchange' [sic] co-location offerings, use of the
above products and services is completely voluntary, and all products
and services are available on a non-discriminatory basis.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\9\ in general, and with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that the proposal is
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. In
particular, the filing codifies and makes transparent uniform fees
imposed for co-location services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\11\ in general,
and with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\12\ in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and
other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility or system which the Exchange operates or controls. In
particular, the Exchange notes that the use of co-location services is
entirely voluntary and made available on a non-discriminatory basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    BX does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\13\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2010-069 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2010-069. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2010-069 and should be
submitted on or before November 23, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27663 Filed 11-1-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1944-1945]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00602]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER16-438-000.
    Applicants: Marshall Wind Energy LLC.

    Description: Supplement to December 1, 2015 Marshall Wind Energy
LLC tariff filing.
    Filed Date: 1/7/16.
    Accession Number: 20160107-5267.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/21/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-612-000.
    Applicants: Greeley Energy Facility, LLC.
    Description: Clarification to December 22, 2015 Greeley Energy
Facility, LLC tariff filing.
    Filed Date: 1/8/16.
    Accession Number: 20160108-5201.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-696-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2016-01-08_Attachment X Funding
Options Filing to be effective 6/24/2015.
    Filed Date: 1/8/16.
    Accession Number: 20160108-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-697-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised ISA Service
Agreement No. 3577, Queue No. Y1-086 per Assignment to be effective 12/
9/2015.
    Filed Date: 1/8/16.
    Accession Number: 20160108-5151.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-698-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: AECC Farmington Delivery
Point Agreement to be effective 12/9/2015.
    Filed Date: 1/8/16.
    Accession Number: 20160108-5164.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-699-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: NCEMC NITSA SA 210 Amendment
to be effective 1/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/8/16.
    Accession Number: 20160108-5166.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-700-000.
    Applicants: CPV Towantic, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market-Based
Rate Authority to be effective 3/9/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/8/16.
    Accession Number: 20160108-5175.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-701-000.
    Applicants: CPV Valley, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market-Based
Rate Authority to be effective 3/9/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/8/16.
    Accession Number: 20160108-5177.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-702-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., American Transmission
Systems, Incorporated, Metropolitan Edison Company, Pennsylvania
Electric Company, The Potomac Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Americans Transmission
Systems, Inc. et al. Filing- New & Revised Service Agrmnts to be
effective 3/8/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/8/16.
    Accession Number: 20160108-5222.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/29/16.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-703-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Address
Adjustments to the SPP Criteria to be effective 3/8/2016.
    Filed Date: 1/8/16.
    Accession Number: 20160108-5225.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/29/16.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 8, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-00602 Filed 1-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 23, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 56)]
[Notices]
[Page 14763-14766]
[DOCID:fr23mr06-84]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53497; File No. SR-PCX-2005-122]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1 Thereto Relating to
Amending Exchange Delisting Rules to Conform to Recent Amendments to
Commission Rules Regarding Removal From Listing and Withdrawal from
Registration

March 16, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 24, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange.\3\ On
January

6, 2006, the Exchange filed Amendent No. 1 to the proposed rule
change.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice and order to
solicit comments on the proposal, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ On March 6, 2006, the Exchange filed with the Commission a
proposed rule change, which was effective upon filing, to change the
name of the Exchange, as well as several other related entities, to
reflect the recent acquisition of PCX by Archipelago Holdings, Inc.
(``Archipelago'') and the merger of NYSE with Archipelago. See File
No. SR-PCX-2006-24. All references herein have been changed to
reflect the aforementioned rule change.
    \4\ See letter from David Strandberg, Attorney, PCX, to Nancy J.
Sanow, Assistant Director, Division of Market Regulation,
Commission, dated January 5, 2006 (``Amendment No. 1''). In
Amendment No. 1, PCX made changes to its rule text to clarify that
the delisting procedures set forth therein apply to instances where
the Exchange is considering delisting for reasons other than those
set forth in subsection (a) of Rule 12d2-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange, through its wholly-owned subsidiary NYSE Arca
Equities, Inc., proposes to amend its rules governing the NYSE Arca
Marketplace, the equities trading facility of NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.
With this filing, the Exchange proposes to amend its rules to comply
with new requirements under Commission Rule 12d2-2, as amended \5\
(``Rule 12d2-2'') promulgated under Section 12(d) \6\ of the Act. The
text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new language is
italicized; proposed deletions are in [brackets].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 240.12d2-2.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    The following version of Rule 5.4(b) shall remain effective until
April 24, 2006: Rule 5.4(b). No changes.
    The following version of Rule 5.4(b) shall become effective on
April 24, 2006: Rule 5.4(b). An issuer proposing to withdraw a security
from listing on the Corporation shall submit to the Corporation a
certified copy of a resolution adopted by the board of directors of the
issuer authorizing withdrawal from listing and registrations, [and] a
[statement setting forth in detail the reasons] letter from an
authorized officer of the issuer providing the specific reasons cited
by the board of directors of the issuer for the proposed withdrawal
[and the facts in support thereof], and a copy of the Form 25 that the
issuer has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in
accordance with Rule 12d2-2 promulgated under Section 12(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, no later than the date of
such filing. The issuer may be required, under special circumstances,
to submit the proposed withdrawal to the shareholders for their vote at
a meeting for which proxies are solicited provided the security is not
also listed on another exchange having similar requirements. The
Corporation, upon receiving written notification of the issuer's intent
to withdraw its securities from listing and registration, shall post
notice of such intent on the Exchange's website by the next business
day and until the delisting becomes effective.
* * * * *
    The following version of Rule 5.5(m) shall remain effective until
April 24, 2006: Rule 5.5(m). No changes.
    The following version of Rule 5.5(m) shall become effective on
April 24, 2006: Rule 5.5(m).

Delisting Procedures

    Whenever the Corporation determines that it [is] may be appropriate
to either suspend dealings in and/or remove securities from listing
pursuant to Rule 5.3 or Rule 5.5, except for [other than routine]
reasons specified in subsection (a) of Rule 12d2-2 promulgated under
Section 12(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(``Exchange Act Rule 12d2-2'') [(e.g., redemptions, maturities, etc.)],
or violations of Rule 5.3(k)(5) in which case the Corporation shall
initiate delisting a listed company's securities, it will follow,
insofar as practicable, the following procedures:

(1) Consideration of Commencement of Delisting Action

    (a) The Corporation shall notify the issuer in writing describing
the basis on which the Corporation is considering the delisting of the
company's security. Such notice shall be sent by certified mail and
shall include the time and place of a meeting to be held by the
Corporation to hear any reasons why the issuer believes its security
should not be delisted. Generally, the issuer will be notified at least
three (3) weeks prior to the meeting and will be requested to submit a
written response.
    [(2)] (b) If, after such meeting, the Corporation determines that
the security should be delisted, the Corporation shall notify the
issuer [by telephone] in writing (if possible, the same day of the
meeting) [and in writing] of the delisting decision and the basis
thereof. The written notice will also inform the issuer that it may
appeal the decision to the Board of Directors and request a hearing.
    [(3)] (c) Concurrent with the Corporation's decision to delist the
issuer's security, the Corporation will prepare a press announcement,
which will be disseminated to the Market Makers and the investing
public no later than the opening of trading the business day following
the Corporation's decision (the Securities Qualification Department
will also distribute the information to the ETP Holders). Accordingly,
the suspension of trading in the issuer's security will become
effective at the opening of business on the day following the
Corporation's decision.

(2) Appeal Procedures

    [(4)] (a) If the issuer requests an appeal hearing, it must file
its request along with (i) a $2,500 delisting appeal fee and (ii) an
answer to the causes specified by the Corporation with the Secretary of
the Corporation no later than five (5) business days following service
of notice of the proposed delisting. If the issuer does not request a
hearing within the specified period of time, or it does not submit the
$2,500 fee to the Corporation in the form and manner prescribed, the
Corporation will submit an application to the Securities and Exchange
Commission to strike the security from list of companies listed on the
Corporation. The Corporation will furnish a copy of such application to
the issuer in accordance with Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and the Rules promulgated thereunder.
    [(5)] (b) If a request for a hearing is made and the requirements
of Rule 5.5(m)[(4)](2)(a) are met within the time specified, the issuer
will be entitled to an appeal hearing and the Corporation will provide
the issuer at least fifteen (15) business days notice of the time and
place of the hearing.
    [(6)] (c) The hearing shall be held before the Board Appeals
Committee appointed by the Board of Directors for such purpose. Only
those members of the Board Appeals Committee who attend the hearing may
vote with respect to any decisions the Committee may make.
    [(7)] (d) Any documents or other written material the issuer wishes
to consider should be submitted to the appropriate office of the
Corporation at least five (5) business days prior to the date of the
hearing.
    [(8)] (e) At the hearing, the issuer must prove its case by
presenting testimony, evidence, and argument to the Board Appeals
Committee. The form and manner in which the actual hearing will be
conducted will be established by the Board Appeals Committee so as to
assure the orderly conduct of the proceeding. At the hearing, the Board
Appeals Committee may require the issuer to furnish additional written
information that has come to its attention.
    [(9)] (f) After the conclusion of the proceeding, the Board Appeals
Committee shall make its decision. The decision of the Board Appeals
Committee shall be in writing with one

copy served upon the issuer and the second copy filed with the
Secretary of the Corporation. Such decision shall be final and
conclusive. If the decision is that the security should be removed from
listing, the Corporation shall follow the procedures set forth below.
If the decision is that the security should not be removed from
listing, the issuer shall receive a notice to that effect from the
Corporation.
    (3) Public Notice of Delisting Action. If the final decision is
that the security of the issuer is to be removed from listing, then, no
fewer than ten (10) days before the delisting becomes effective: (a) an
application on Form 25 shall be submitted by the Corporation to the
Securities and Exchange Commission to strike the security from listing
and registration in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 12d2-2, [and] (b)
a copy of such application shall be provided to the issuer in
accordance with [Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the Rules promulgated thereunder] Exchange Act Rule 12d2-2, and (c)
public notice of the Corporation's final determination to delist the
security shall be made via a press release and posting on the
Corporation's website until the delisting is effective. [If the
decision is that the security should not be removed from listing, the
issuer shall receive a notice to that effect from the Corporation.]
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change, as
amended. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.4(b) sets forth the Exchange procedures
that apply when an issuer proposes to withdraw a security from listing
on the Exchange. Rule 5.5(m) provides the applicable procedures when
the Exchange considers removing securities from listing. The Exchange
proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.4(b) and NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 5.5(m) to comply with new requirements under Rule 12d2-2 and to
otherwise clarify the Exchange's withdrawal and delisting procedures.
The Exchange will implement the proposed rule change immediately upon
approval by the Commission.
    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.4(b) to
comply with new requirements under Rule 12d2-2 relating to voluntary
delistings by issuers.\7\ Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.4(b) to provide that an issuer proposing to
withdraw a security from listing on the Exchange shall submit to the
Exchange a copy of the Form 25 that the issuer has filed with the
Commission in accordance with Rule 12d2-2 no later than the date of
such filing. Further, the Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 5.4(b) to provide that the Exchange, upon receiving notification
by an issuer of its intent to withdraw its securities from listing and
registration, will post notice of such intent on the Exchange's Web
site by the next business day and will continue to post the notice
until the delisting becomes effective.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Rule 12d2-2(c)(2)(iii) and (c)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.4(b) to clarify that the issuer, when proposing to withdraw its
securities from listing and registration, must submit to the Exchange a
``letter from an authorized officer of the issuer providing the
specific reasons cited by the board of directors of the issuer for the
proposed withdrawal,'' rather than a ``statement setting forth in
detail the reasons for the proposed withdrawal and the facts in support
thereof.'' The Exchange wishes to make this clarification because it
has received several inquiries from issuers on this particular part of
the rule.
    The Exchange also proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.5(m)
to comply with new requirements under Rule 12d2-2 relating to the
delisting procedures that apply when the Exchange determines that it
may be appropriate to remove securities from listing.\8\ Specifically,
the Exchange proposes new Rule 5.5(m)(3) to provide that, in the event
the Exchange makes a final decision to remove the security of an issuer
from listing, the Exchange will take the following actions, no fewer
than ten (10) days before the delisting becomes effective: (i) An
application on Form 25 will be submitted by the Exchange to the
Commission to strike the security from listing and registration in
accordance with Rule 12d2-2; (ii) a copy of such application will be
provided to the issuer in accordance with Rule 12d2-2; and (iii) public
notice of the Exchange's final determination to delist the security
will be made via a press release and posting on the Exchange's website
until the delisting is effective. In connection with this proposed
change, the Exchange also proposes to make reference to the above
public notice procedures in the appeal procedures discussion in new
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.5(m)(2)(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Rule 12d2-2(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.5(m)
to make certain clarifications. In the introductory paragraph of the
Rule, the Exchange proposes to clarify that the delisting procedures
set forth therein apply to instances where the Exchange is considering
delisting for reasons other than those set forth in subsection (a) of
Rule 12d2-2. In addition, the Exchange proposes to include headings in
the Rule that clarify that the delisting procedures apply: (i) When the
Exchange is considering commencement of delisting action, (ii) when an
issuer chooses to appeal the Exchange's initial determination and,
(iii) when the Exchange takes final delisting action. In addition, the
Exchange proposes to clarify in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.5(m)(1)(b)
that the Exchange, when considering commencement of delisting action,
will notify the issuer in writing, if possible, the same day of the
meeting, rather than by telephone. The Exchange proposes this
clarification because it is in accordance with the Exchange's current
practices.
2. Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change, as amended, is
consistent with Section 6(b) \9\ of the Act, in general, and furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\10\ in particular, because it is
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove impediments and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change, as
amended, will impose any burden on competition

that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change, as amended, were
neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
    (A) By order approve such rule change, or
    (B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-PCX-2005-122 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-122. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the NYSE Arca, Inc. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-122 and should be submitted on
or before April 13, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-4182 Filed 3-22-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: July 1, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 126)]
[Notices]
[Page 38161-38162]
[DOCID:fr01jy10-125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62378; File No. SR-CBOE-2010-061]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to Deletion of Obsolete CBOE Rule 2.50

Date: June 25, 2010.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 21, 2010, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``CBOE'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the CBOE. CBOE
has filed the proposal pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\
and rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder, which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission.\4\ The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
parties.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    CBOE is filing this proposed rule change to delete CBOE rule 2.50
in connection with a change in the parent company of C2 Options
Exchange, Incorporated (``C2'') from CBOE to CBOE Holdings, Inc.
(``CBOE Holdings''). The text of the proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.org/legal), at the
Exchange's Office of the Secretary, at the Commission's Public
Reference Room and on the Commission's Web site http://www.sec.gov.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, CBOE included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') has
approved a rule filing by CBOE to accommodate the demutualization and
restructuring of CBOE from a Delaware non-stock corporation to a
Delaware stock corporation wholly owned by CBOE Holdings, a holding
company organized as a Delaware stock corporation (``Restructuring
Transaction'').\5\ The Restructuring Transaction was consummated on
June 18, 2010. The Commission has also approved a rule filing by C2 to
accommodate a change in its parent company from CBOE to CBOE Holdings
in connection with the Restructuring Transaction.\6\ C2 became a wholly
owned subsidiary of CBOE Holdings on June 18, 2010 in connection with
the consummation of the Restructuring Transaction.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release 62158 (May 24, 2010), 75 FR
30082 (May 28, 2010) (SR-CBOE-2008-88).
    \6\ Securities Exchange Act Release 62323 (June 17, 2010) (SR-
C2-2010-002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CBOE is now proposing to delete CBOE rule 2.50 because it addresses
CBOE's responsibility as the prior parent company of C2 for ensuring
that C2 meets its obligations as a self-regulatory organization. Since
CBOE is no longer the parent company of C2, CBOE Rule 2.50 is no longer
applicable. Additionally, equivalent protections to those set forth in
CBOE Rule 2.50 are contained in the CBOE Holdings Certificate of
Incorporation and CBOE Holdings Bylaws, which apply to CBOE Holdings in
its new capacity as the parent company of C2.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release 62158 (May 24, 2010), 75
FR 30082 (May 28, 2010) (SR-CBOE-2008-88) (which describes the
provisions designed to protect the self-regulatory functions of
Regulated Securities Exchange Subsidiaries of CBOE Holdings, which
currently consist of CBOE and C2, and sets forth the Commission's
findings that those provisions are consistent with the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (``Act''), 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change eliminates an obsolete rule, the subject
matter of which is now addressed by other provisions that have been
approved by the Commission. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the provisions of section .6 of
the (``Act''),\8\ in general, and with section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\
in particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
of a free and open market and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative prior to 30 days from the date on which it was filed,
or such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, the proposed rule
change has become effective pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act
\10\ and rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.\11\ However,
rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. The Exchange requested that the Commission waive
the 30-day operative delay, as specified in rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\12\
which would make the rule

change effective and operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii). In addition, rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) requires the self-regulatory organization to give the
Commission notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change,
along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. CBOE has satisfied this requirement.
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because doing so will allow CBOE to immediately delete an obsolete rule
and update its rule book, which in turn will avoid potential confusion.
Accordingly, the Commission designates the proposed rule change as
operative upon filing with the Commission.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay for this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2010-061 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-061. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the self-regulatory
organization. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
CBOE-2010-061 and should be submitted on or before July 22, 2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-15995 Filed 6-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 29, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59527-59528]
[FR Doc No: 2023-18597]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2023-0294]

Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management
and Budget; OMB Control Number 1625-0100

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Thirty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the
U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding an Information Collection Request (ICR),
abstracted below, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension
of its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0100,
Advanced Notice of Vessel Arrival; without change.
    Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the
public. Review and comments by OIRA ensure we only impose paperwork
burdens commensurate with our performance of duties.

DATES: You may submit comments to the Coast Guard and OIRA on or before
September 28, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Comments to the Coast Guard should be submitted using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Search for
docket number [USCG-2023-0294]. Written comments and recommendations to
OIRA for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30
days of publication of this notice to https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
    Find this particular information collection by selecting
``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using
the search function.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available
from: Commandant (CG-6P), Attn: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S.
Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE, Stop 7710, Washington,
DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.L. Craig, Office of Privacy
Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions
on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an
application to OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a
Coast Guard collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains
information describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's
likely burden on the affected public, an explanation of the necessity
of the Collection, and other important information describing the
Collection. There is one ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) the practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. These comments
will help OIRA determine whether to approve the ICR referred to in this
Notice.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments to Coast Guard or OIRA must contain the
OMB Control Number of the ICR. They must also contain the docket number
of this request, [USCG-2023-0294], and must be received by September
28, 2023.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments to the Coast Guard will
be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will
include any personal information you have provided. For more about
privacy and submissions to the Coast Guard in response to this
document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020). For more about privacy and submissions to OIRA in
response to this document, see the https://www.reginfo.gov, comment-
submission web page. OIRA posts its decisions on ICRs online at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain after the comment period for each
ICR. An OMB Notice of Action on each ICR will become available via a
hyperlink in the OMB Control Number: 1625-0100.

Previous Request for Comments

    This request provides a 30-day comment period required by OIRA. The
Coast Guard published the 60-day notice (88 FR 29921, May 9, 2022)
required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). That notice elicited no comments.
Accordingly, no changes have been made to the Collection.

Information Collection Request

    Title: Advance Notice of Vessel Arrival.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0100.

    Summary: The statute 46 U.S.C. 70001 authorizes the Coast Guard to
require pre-arrival messages from any vessel entering a port or place
in the United States.
    Need: This information is required under 33 CFR 146 and 33 CFR 160
subpart C to control vessel traffic, develop contingency plans, and
enforce regulations.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Owners and operators of vessels and facilities.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from
104,560 hours to 202,021 hours a year; due to an increase in the
estimated annual number of responses.
    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter
35, as amended.

    Dated: August 3, 2023.
Kathleen Claffie,
Chief, Office of Privacy Management, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2023-18597 Filed 8-28-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: November 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 224)]
[Notices]
[Page 61186-61189]
[DOCID:fr23no09-100]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61000; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2009-094]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Require That Companies Provide Nasdaq With at Least Ten Minutes Prior
Notification When Releasing Material Information and Eliminate a
Potential Inconsistency With Commission Guidance on the Use of Company
Websites To Satisfy Public Disclosure Requirements

November 16, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on November 5, 2009, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq has
designated the proposed rule change as effecting a change described
under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act,\3\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq proposes to require, rather than recommend, that Nasdaq-
listed companies provide Nasdaq with at least ten minutes prior
notification when releasing material information. In addition, Nasdaq
proposes to modify rule language that may be inconsistent with
Commission guidance on the use of company websites to satisfy public
disclosure requirements. The proposed rule change, which is immediately
effective, shall become operative on December 7, 2009.
    The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new
language is in italics; proposed deletions are in brackets.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Changes are marked to the rule text that appears in the
electronic manual of Nasdaq found at http://
nasdaqomx.cchwallstreet.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
5250. Obligations for Companies Listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market
    (a) No change.
    (b) Obligation to Make Public Disclosure.
    (1) Except in unusual circumstances, a Nasdaq-listed Company shall
make prompt disclosure to the public through any Regulation FD
compliant method (or combination of methods) of disclosure of any
material information that would reasonably be expected to affect the
value of its securities or influence investors' decisions. The Company
shall, prior to the release of the information, provide notice of such
disclosure to Nasdaq's MarketWatch Department at least ten minutes
prior to public announcement if the information involves any of the
events set forth in IM-5250-1. As described in IM-5250-1, prior notice
to the MarketWatch Department [should] must be made through the
electronic disclosure submission system available at www.nasdaq.net,
except in emergency situations.
    (2)-(3) No change.
    (c)-(f) No change.

IM-5250-1. Disclosure of Material Information
    Rule 5250(b)(1) requires that, except in unusual circumstances,
Nasdaq Companies disclose promptly to the public through any Regulation
FD compliant method (or combination of methods) of disclosure any
material information that would reasonably be expected to affect the
value of their securities or influence investors' decisions. Nasdaq
Companies must notify Nasdaq at least ten minutes prior to [in the
manner described below of] the release to the public of [such] material
information that involves any of the events set forth below [prior to
its release to the public]. [Nasdaq recommends that Nasdaq Companies
provide such notification at least ten minutes before such release.]
Under unusual circumstances Companies may not be required to make
public disclosure of material events; for example, where it is possible
to maintain confidentiality of those events and immediate public
disclosure would prejudice the ability of the Company to pursue its
legitimate corporate objectives. However, Nasdaq Companies remain
obligated to disclose this information to Nasdaq upon request pursuant
to Rule 5250(a).
    Paragraph 2. No change.
Notification to Nasdaq MarketWatch Department
    Nasdaq Companies must notify Nasdaq's MarketWatch Department prior
to the distribution of certain material news at least ten minutes prior
to public announcement of the news. Except in emergency situations,
this notification must be made through Nasdaq's electronic disclosure
submission system available at www.nasdaq.net. In emergency situations,
Companies [shall] may instead provide notification by telephone or
facsimile. Examples of an emergency situation include: lack of computer
or internet access; technical problems on either the Company or Nasdaq
system or an incompatibility between those systems; and a material
development such that no draft disclosure document exists, but
immediate notification to MarketWatch is important based on the
material event.
    If a Nasdaq Company repeatedly fails to either notify Nasdaq at
least ten minutes prior to the distribution of material news, or
repeatedly [fail] fails to use the electronic disclosure submission
system when Nasdaq finds no emergency situation existed, Nasdaq may
issue a Public Reprimand Letter (as defined in Rule 5805(j)) or, in
extreme cases, a Staff Delisting Determination (as defined in Rule
5805(h)). In determining whether to issue a Public Reprimand Letter,
Nasdaq will consider whether the Company has demonstrated a pattern of
failures, whether the Company has been contacted concerning previous
violations, and whether the Company has taken steps to assure that
future violations will not occur.
Trading Halts
    Paragraphs 1-3. No change.
    Companies are required to notify the MarketWatch Department of the
release of material information included in the following list of
events at least ten minutes prior to the release of such information to
the public. It should also be noted that every development that might
be reported to Nasdaq in these areas would not necessarily be deemed to
warrant a trading halt. In addition to the following list of events,
Nasdaq encourages Companies to avail themselves of the opportunity for
advance notification to the MarketWatch Department in situations where
they believe, based upon their knowledge of the significance of the
information, that a temporary trading halt may be necessary or
appropriate.
    (a)-(h) No change.
Use of Regulation FD Compliant Methods in the Disclosure of Material
Information
    Regardless of the method of disclosure that a Company chooses to
use, Companies are required to notify the MarketWatch Department of the
release of material information that involves any of the events set
forth above at least ten minutes prior to its release to the public.
[Nasdaq recommends that Companies provide such notification at least
ten minutes before such release.] When a Company chooses to utilize a
Regulation FD compliant method for disclosure other than a press
release or Form 8-K, the Company will be required to provide prior
notice to the MarketWatch Department of: (1) The press release
announcing the logistics of the future disclosure event; and (2) a
descriptive summary of the material information to be announced during
the disclosure event if the press release does not contain such a
summary.
    Depending on the materiality of the information and the anticipated
effect of the information on the price of the Company's securities, the
MarketWatch Department may advise the Company that a temporary trading
halt is appropriate to allow for full dissemination of the information
and to maintain an orderly market. The MarketWatch Department will
assess with Companies using methods of disclosure other than a press
release or Form 8-K the timing within the disclosure event when the
Company will cover the material information so that the halt can be
commenced accordingly. Companies will be responsible for promptly
alerting the MarketWatch Department of any significant changes to the
previously outlined disclosure timeline. Companies are reminded that
the posting of information on [its own] the company's Web site [is] may
not by itself be considered a sufficient method of public disclosure
under Regulation FD and SEC guidance and releases thereunder, and as a
result, under Nasdaq rules.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Pursuant to Rule 5250(b)(1) and IM-5250-1, a Nasdaq-listed company
is required, except in unusual circumstances, to make prompt disclosure
to the public through any Regulation FD compliant method (or
combination of methods) of disclosure of any material information that
would reasonably be expected to affect the value of its securities or
influence investors' decisions. These rules also require the company
to, prior to the release of the information; provide notice of such
disclosure to Nasdaq's MarketWatch Department if the information
involves any of the events set forth in IM-5250-1. This prior notice,
which must be made through the electronic disclosure submission system
available at http://www.nasdaq.net, except in emergency situations,
allows the MarketWatch Department to assess whether it is appropriate
to implement a trading halt to allow full

dissemination of the news by the public and to maintain an orderly
trading market.\5\ IM-5250-1 currently provides that Nasdaq recommends
companies provide such notification at least ten minutes before
release.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Rule 4120 for the Exchange's procedures with respect to
trading halts pending dissemination of material news.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq proposes to amend Rule 5250(b)(1) and IM-5250-1 to require
notification to the Exchange of such announcements at least ten minutes
prior to public release. Nasdaq believes that mandating pre-
notification ten minutes before public release of news is appropriate
to enable the Exchange to consider whether trading in the security
should be temporarily halted.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The proposed ten-minute pre-notification requirement is
consistent with Section 202.06(B) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual,
which requires that a company notify the NYSE ten minutes prior to
announcing material information.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change also modifies language in IM-5250-1 that,
as currently written, may be inconsistent with an interpretive release
recently published by the Commission providing guidance on the use of
company websites.\7\ Under that guidance, the posting of information on
a company website could be considered a sufficient method of public
disclosure under Regulation FD. The language currently contained in IM-
5250-1 indicates that a website posting alone does not by itself
satisfy the public disclosure requirements of Regulation FD. Nasdaq
proposes to modify this language to instead provide that a Web site
posting alone may not by itself satisfy those requirements. Finally,
the proposed rule change would make non-substantive changes to Rule
5250(b)(1) and IM-52501-1 to clarify the language of those rules and
reinforce the existing requirement for electronic notification to
Nasdaq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58288 (August 1,
2008), 73 FR 45862 (August 7, 2008) (Commission Guidance on the Use
of Company Web Sites).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\8\ in general and with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in particular. The proposed change would enhance
Nasdaq's ability to conduct timely reviews of company disclosures and
will eliminate an inconsistency between Nasdaq's rules and guidance set
forth by the Commission, thereby facilitating the operation of a free
and open market, and protecting investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate; provided that the
self-regulatory organization has given the Commission written notice of
its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change,
or such shorter time as designated by the Commission,\10\ it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed rule change to require ten minutes prior notification
of material news is closely modeled after similar rules of another
national securities exchange \13\ and therefore Nasdaq believes that it
does not significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest or raise any novel or significant regulatory issues. The
proposed rule change to modify text discussing the use of a company
website as a Regulation FD method of disclosure is designed to
eliminate an inconsistency with guidance published by the Commission
\14\ and therefore Nasdaq believes that it also does not significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest or raise any
novel or significant regulatory issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Section 202.06(B) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, supra,
note 6.
    \14\ Commission Guidance on the Use of Company Web Sites, supra,
note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate the rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-094 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2009-094. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make

available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
NASDAQ-2009-094 and should be submitted on or before December 14, 2009.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-27998 Filed 11-20-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 14165-14167]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05280]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 31418; Amdt. No. 3999]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or removes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPS) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure procedures (ODPs) for operations at certain
airports. These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption
of new or revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the
National Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is March 14, 2022. The compliance date for each SIAP,
associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the amendatory
provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of March 14, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Ops-M30. 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, West Bldg., Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization Service Area in which the
affected airport is located;
    3. The office of Aeronautical Information Services, 6500 South

MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected] or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

Availability

    All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free
of charge. Visit the National Flight Data Center at nfdc.faa.gov to
register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from the FAA Air Traffic Organization Service
Area in which the affected airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedures
and Airspace Group, Flight Technologies and Procedures Division, Flight
Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration. Mailing Address:
FAA Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, Flight Procedures and Airspace
Group, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Registry Bldg. 29, Room 104,
Oklahoma City, OK 73169. Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends 14 CFR part 97 by
establishing, amending, suspending, or removes SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums
and/or ODPS. The complete regulatory description of each SIAP and its
associated Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed
on FAA form documents which are incorporated by reference in this
amendment under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20.
The applicable FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, 8260-15B,
when required by an entry on 8260-15A, and 8260-15C.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, their complex
nature, and the need for a special format make publication in the
Federal Register expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use
the regulatory text of the SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead
refer to their graphic depiction on charts printed by publishers or
aeronautical materials. Thus, the advantages of incorporation by
reference are realized and publication of the complete description of
each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on FAA form documents is
unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR sections and
specifies the typed of SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs with their
applicable effective dates. This amendment also identifies the airport
and its location, the procedure, and the amendment number.

Availability and Summary of Material Incorporated by Reference

    The material incorporated by reference is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    The material incorporated by reference describes SIAPS, Takeoff
Minimums and/or ODPs as identified in the amendatory language for part
97 of this final rule.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as amended in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flights safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts.
    The circumstances that created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less
than 30 days. For the remaining SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPs and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are impracticable and contrary
to the public interest and, where applicable, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d),
good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air traffic control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 4, 2022.
Thomas J. Nichols,
Aviation Safety, Flight Standards Service, Manager, Standards Section,
Flight Procedures & Airspace Group, Flight Technologies & Procedures
Division.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CRF part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or removing Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0901 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113,
40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Effective 21 April 2022

Milwaukee, WI, KMWC, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4L, Orig-E

Effective 19 May 2022

Fort Smith, AR, KFSM, ILS OR LOC RWY 8, Amdt 1B
Fort Smith, AR, KFSM, ILS Z OR LOC Z RWY 26, Amdt 22A
Fort Smith, AR, KFSM, RADAR-1, Amdt 8F
Fort Smith, AR, KFSM, RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Amdt 2C
Fort Smith, AR, KFSM, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Amdt 1C
Fort Smith, AR, KFSM, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 1C
Fort Smith, AR, Fort Smith Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 4B
Fort Smith, AR, KFSM, VOR Z OR TACAN Z RWY 8, Amdt 11F
Fort Smith, AR, KFSM, VOR Z OR TACAN Z RWY 26, Amdt 20K
Casa Grande, AZ, KCGZ, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Amdt 1
Paso Robles, CA, KPRB, PASO ROBLES TWO GRAPHIC DP
Paso Robles, CA, KPRB, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2A
San Francisco, CA, KSFO, ILS OR LOC RWY 28R, ILS RWY 28R (SA CAT I),
ILS
RWY 28R (CAT II), ILS RWY 28R (CAT III), Amdt 15B

Granby, CO, KGNB, RNAV (GPS)-C, Orig
Holyoke, CO, KHEQ, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig-F
Jekyll Island, GA, 09J, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 1B, CANCELLED
Mountain Home, ID, U76, ALKAL ONE GRAPHIC DP
Mountain Home, ID, U76, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig
Mountain Home, ID, U76, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Amdt 2
Mountain Home, ID, U76, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 6
Mount Vernon, IL, KMVN, ILS OR LOC RWY 23, Amdt 12A
Indianapolis, IN, KTYQ, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 1D
Indianapolis, IN, KTYQ, VOR RWY 18, Amdt 1E
Lafayette, IN, KLAF, ILS OR LOC RWY 10, Amdt 11D
Logansport, IN, KGGP, VOR-A, Amdt 7B, CANCELLED
Peru, IN, I76, VOR RWY 1, Amdt 8E, CANCELLED
Sheridan, IN, 5I4, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Amdt 1
Sheridan, IN, 5I4, VOR-A, Amdt 6B, CANCELLED
Marion, KY, KGDA, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Lafayette, LA, KLFT, RADAR 1, Amdt 11, CANCELLED
Lake Charles, LA, KLCH, LOC BC RWY 33, Amdt 20A, CANCELLED
Bedford, MA, Laurence G Hanscom FLD, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 6A
Rangeley, ME, 8B0, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig
Rangeley, ME, 8B0, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig
Cheboygan, MI, KSLH, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 3D
Detroit, MI, KYIP, ILS OR LOC RWY 5, Orig
Detroit, MI, KYIP, ILS OR LOC RWY 5R, Amdt 16, CANCELLED
Detroit, MI, KYIP, ILS OR LOC RWY 23, Orig
Detroit, MI, KYIP, ILS OR LOC RWY 23L, Amdt 8, CANCELLED
Detroit, MI, KYIP, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig
Detroit, MI, KYIP, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5R, Amdt 2, CANCELLED
Detroit, MI, KYIP, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Detroit, MI, KYIP, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23L, Amdt 2, CANCELLED
Detroit, MI, Willow Run, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 11
Troy, MI, KVLL, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Amdt 3A
Troy, MI, KVLL, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4B
Appleton, MN, AQP, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig-B
Camdenton, MO, KOZS, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 3
Bozeman, MT, KBZN, ILS OR LOC RWY 12, Amdt 9D
Plentywood, MT, KPWD, RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Orig-D
Plentywood, MT, KPWD, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Orig-D
Fayetteville, NC, Fayetteville Rgnl/Grannis Field, Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle DP, Orig-A
Binghamton, NY, KBGM, ILS OR LOC RWY 16, Amdt 8
East Hampton, NY, KHTO, RNAV (GPS) X RWY 10, Amdt 1A, CANCELLED
East Hampton, NY, KHTO, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 10, Amdt 1, CANCELLED
East Hampton, NY, KHTO, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 28, Amdt 2, CANCELLED
East Hampton, NY, KHTO, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 10, Amdt 1A, CANCELLED
East Hampton, NY, KHTO, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 28, Amdt 1, CANCELLED
East Hampton, NY, East Hampton, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 3A, CANCELLED
Skaneateles, NY, 6B9, RNAV (GPS)-B, Orig-A
Oklahoma City, OK, KOKC, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 3D
Oklahoma City, OK, KOKC, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 17L, Amdt 3D
Oklahoma City, OK, KOKC, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 17R, Amdt 6A
Oklahoma City, OK, KPWA, ILS OR LOC RWY 35R, Amdt 1
Oklahoma City, OK, KPWA, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17L, Amdt 2B
Oklahoma City, OK, KPWA, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17R, Orig-A
Oklahoma City, OK, KPWA, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35L, Orig-A
Oklahoma City, OK, KPWA, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35R, Amdt 1
Stillwater, OK, KSWO, ILS OR LOC RWY 17, Amdt 3
Stillwater, OK, KSWO, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 1C
Sumter, SC, KSMS, NDB RWY 23, Amdt 3A, CANCELLED
Gettysburg, SD, 0D8, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 2C
Gettysburg, SD, 0D8, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 2C
Springfield, TN, M91, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 1D
Springfield, TN, M91, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 1D
Coleman, TX, KCOM, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 1B
Corsicana, TX, KCRS, NDB RWY 32, Amdt 3D, CANCELLED
Houston, TX, KIAH, RNAV (RNP) Y RWY 26L, Orig-E
Midland, TX, KMDD, VOR RWY 25, Amdt 3E
Salt Lake City, UT, KSLC, LDA RWY 35, Orig-D
Salt Lake City, UT, KSLC, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 3B
Bellingham, WA, KBLI, RNAV (RNP) Z RWY 34, Amdt 1B
Spokane, WA, KGEG, VOR RWY 21, Orig

    Rescinded: On February 23, 2022 (87 FR 10069), the FAA published
an Amendment in Docket No. 31413, Amdt No. 3995, to Part 97 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations under section 97.29. The following
entry for Binghamton, NY, effective March 24, 2022, is hereby
rescinded in its entirety:

Binghamton, NY, KBGM, ILS OR LOC RWY 16, Amdt 8

[FR Doc. 2022-05280 Filed 3-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P