[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3010-3011]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00807]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0127]

Reports, Forms, and Record Keeping Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatements of previously approved collections.
    This document describes the collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 23, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by DOT Docket ID Number
NHTSA-2014-0127 using any of the following methods:

    Electronic submissions: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
    Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. Fax: 1-(202) 493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
Docket number for this Notice. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov including any
personal information provided.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. J. Stephen Higgins, Contracting
Officer's Technical Representative, Office of Behavioral Safety
Research (NTI-132), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W46-474, Washington, DC 20590. Dr. Higgins'
phone number is<PHONE_NUMBER> and his email address is
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following: (i)
Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the information will have practical utility; (ii) The accuracy of the
agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) How to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including the
use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. In
compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks public comment on the
following proposed collection of information:

Characterizing Ambulance Driver Training in EMS Systems

    Type of Request--New information collection requirement.
    OMB Clearance Number--None.
    Form Number--NHTSA 1186.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval--3 years from date of
approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information--In order to characterize
ambulance driver training across the United States, the National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) proposes to collect
information from EMS agencies providing ambulance services and State
offices responsible for overseeing training, licensing, and regulation
of EMS agencies and their drivers. NHTSA is interested in learning
about what types of driver training are required, when the training is
required (new drivers, continuing education, etc.), how driving
incidents (crashes, moving violations, etc.) impact driving privileges,
initial qualification standards (age, number of years with license,
driving record, etc.), and other related topics. Participation in the
study will be voluntary and will only include State level agency
representatives and representatives from EMS agencies that offer
ambulance services. Data collection will be in the form of semi-
structured interviews in-person or over the phone of contacts at State
offices and an Internet-based survey of EMS agencies providing
ambulance services. EMS agencies will be contacted via email, mail, or
phone with a link to the Internet survey. State offices will be
contacted via email or phone to participate in the semi-structured
interviews.
    Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information-- NHTSA has the responsibility for making driving safer by
ensuring that drivers commit the fewest errors possible and by
attempting to render the residual errors that are committed benign. Not
all drivers, however, face the same level of risk on the road or the
same task demands. Emergency vehicle operators must deal with critical
time demands, large vehicles, and numerous potential and unavoidable
distractions inherent in the response to emergencies.
    Operator training is one method that human factors professionals
have used in virtually all domains to reduce human error and thereby
increase the safety of operations. Although emergency vehicle training
for ambulance drivers has been repeatedly identified as an important
step in the safety system, the current situation with respect to
ambulance driver training in the United States is not well
characterized. This project will document the types of driver training
offered, when this training is required, how driving incidents impact
driving privileges, initial qualification standards, and other related
topics discovered throughout the course of the study. The results of
this project will assist NHTSA in determining the current state of
ambulance driver training which will help the Agency determine if
additional research and development on the topic are warranted.
    Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)--
The participant groups being sought include representatives from up to
21,283 EMS agencies across the United States and representatives from
State offices for the 50 States and Washington DC Participants from EMS
agencies will be recruited via email to respond to an Internet-based
survey. The survey will be completed a single time by one
representative from the solicited agencies. Approximately 153 semi-
structured interviews (up to 3 per State and Washington DC since
multiple offices may be responsible for various aspects of ambulance
driver training and regulation) will be conducted via telephone with
personnel from State offices. The total sample size has the potential
to be 21,436 participants.
    Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Record Keeping Burden
Resulting from the Collection of Information--The 153 conversations
with State personnel will average approximately 60 minutes in length
including introduction, demographics, ambulance driver training/
licensing requirements, training course description and content review,
and conclusion. The estimated completion time for the Internet-based
survey of EMS agency representatives is 30 minutes per agency. The
total estimated annual burden if all solicited participants respond is
10,794.50 hours. Participants will incur no costs and no record keeping
burden from the information collection.

    Authority:  44 U.S.C. Section 3506(c)(2)(A).

    Dated: January 14, 2015.
Jeff Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2015-00807 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 87 (Monday, May 8, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21384-21385]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09245]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP17-15-000]

Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP; Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review of the Eastern Market Access Project

    On November 15, 2016, Dominion Cove Point LNG, LP (Dominion) filed
an application in Docket No. CP17-15-000 requesting a Certificate of
Public Convenience and Necessity pursuant to section 7(c) of the
Natural Gas Act to construct and operate certain natural gas pipeline
facilities. DCP's proposed Eastern Market Access Project (Project) in
Maryland and Virginia would transport about 294 million cubic feet per
day of firm natural gas service to Washington Gas Light Company and
provide fuel to Mattawoman Energy, LLC's Mattawoman Energy Center
(power generation facility).
    On November 30, 2016, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
(FERC or Commission) issued its Notice of Application for the Project.
Among other things, that notice alerted other agencies issuing federal
authorizations of the requirement to complete all necessary reviews and
to reach a final decision on the request for a federal authorization
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's
Environmental Assessment (EA) for the Project. This instant notice
identifies the FERC staff's planned schedule for completion of the EA
for the Project.

Schedule for Environmental Review

Issuance of the EA June 27, 2017
90-day Federal Authorization Decision Deadline September 25, 2017

    If a schedule change becomes necessary, additional notice will be
provided so that the relevant agencies are kept informed of the
Project's progress.

Project Description

    The Eastern Market Access Project consists of a new 24,370
horsepower (hp) compressor station and installation of two new taps at
an existing Washington Gas Light Company Interconnect in Charles
County, Maryland; one new 7,000 hp electric-driven compressor and
replacement of three existing gas coolers and compression cylinders at
the existing Loudoun County Compressor Station, and a new meter
building to enclose existing equipment at the Loudoun Meter &
Regulating Station in Loudoun County, Virginia; and re-wheeling of the
compressor on a 17,400 hp electric unit and upgrading two gas coolers
at the Pleasant Valley Compressor Station in Fairfax County, Virginia.

Background

    On February 15, 2017, the Commission issued a Notice of Intent to
Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Eastern Market
Access Project, Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, and
Notice of Public Scoping Session (NOI). The NOI was sent to affected
landowners; federal, state, and local government agencies; elected
officials; environmental and public interest groups; Native American
tribes; local libraries and newspapers; and other interested parties.
In response to the Notice of Application and the NOI, the Commission
received 336 comments, including comments from 2 federal agencies, 4
local agencies, 4 state agencies, 3 non-governmental agencies, 14
companies (including 6 chambers of commerce), and 328 individuals. The
primary issues raised during scoping include impacts on: Drinking water
supplies, surface waterbodies, and wetlands; forested areas and
wildlife; surrounding land use; visual resources; historic properties
and Native American tribes; air quality and noise; and public safety.

Additional Information

    In order to receive notification of the issuance of the EA and to
keep track of all formal issuances and submittals in specific dockets,
the Commission offers a free service called eSubscription. This can
reduce the amount of time you spend researching proceedings by
automatically providing you with notification of these filings,
document summaries, and direct links to the documents. Go to
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.
    Additional information about the Project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs at (866) 208-FERC or on the
FERC Web site (www.ferc.gov). Using the eLibrary link, select General
Search from the eLibrary menu, enter the selected date range and
``Docket Number'' excluding the last three digits (i.e., CP17-15), and
follow the instructions. For assistance with access to eLibrary, the
helpline can be reached at<PHONE_NUMBER>, TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>, or at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The eLibrary link on the FERC Web site also

provides access to the texts of formal documents issued by the
Commission, such as orders, notices, and rule makings.

    Dated: May 2, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-09245 Filed 5-5-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


<EPA REGISTRATION DIVISION COMPANY NOTICE OF FILING FOR PESTICIDE
PETITIONS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER  >

<EPA Registration Division contact: Laura E. Nollen,<PHONE_NUMBER>>

<<Interregional Research Project Number 4 (IR-4) >

>

<Petition Number PP #9E7632>

<	EPA has received a pesticide petition, PP #9E7632, from Interregional
Research Project Number 4 (IR-4), Rutgers, The State University of NJ,
500 College Road East, Suite 201 W Princeton, NJ 08540 proposing,
pursuant to section 408(d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), 21 U.S.C. 346a(d), to amend 40 CFR part 180.608> by revising
the tolerance expression under (a)(1) and (a)(2) to read:

(a)(1).  Tolerances are established for residues of the insecticide
spirodiclofen, including its metabolites and degradates. Compliance with
the tolerance levels specified is to be determined by measuring only
spirodiclofen (3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutanoate).

180.608 (2).  Tolerances are established for residues of the insecticide
spirodiclofen, including its metabolites and degradates. Compliance with
the tolerance levels specified is to be determined by measuring only the
sum of spirodiclofen
(3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutanoate) and its metabolite
3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-hydroxy-1-oxaspiro[4.5]dec-3-en-2-one,
calculated as the stoichiometric equivalent of spirodiclofen.

Additionally, this petition proposes to amend 40 CFR part 180.608 by
establishing a tolerance for residues of spirodiclofen
(3-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-2-oxo-1-oxaspiro[4,5]dec-3-en-4-yl
2,2-dimethylbutanoate) in or on the raw agricultural commodity Bushberry
subgroup 13-07B at 4.0 parts per million (ppm).  EPA has determined that
the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set
forth in section 408 (d)(2) of  FDDCA; however, EPA has not fully
evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether
the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be
needed before EPA rules on the petition.

<A. Residue Chemistry>

<	1. Plant metabolism. The metabolism of spirodiclofen in plants is
adequately

understood. Studies have been conducted to delineate the metabolism of

radiolabeled spirodiclofen in various crops, all showing similar
results. The residue

of concern is spirodiclofen.>

<	2. Analytical method. Adequate analytical methodology using LC/MS/MS

detection is available for enforcement purposes.>

<	3. Magnitude of residues. Magnitude of the residue data was conducted
on

blueberry in accordance with OPPTS Guideline 860.1500. The data supports

establishing the requested tolerance.>

<B. Toxicological Profile>

<	1. Acute toxicity.  Oral and dermal LD50 values were >2000 mg/kg bw.>

Inhalation LC50 values were >5030 mg/m3 air. Spirodiclofen was not
irritating to

rabbit skin or eyes but did cause skin sensitization in the
Magnusson/Kligman

maximization test in guinea pigs. Acute toxicity studies for
spirodiclofen support an

overall toxicity Category III.

<	2. Genotoxicty. Several genotoxicity tests were conducted to test for
point- mutagenic> activity, chromosome aberration in vitro and in vivo,
and for DNA

repair. All tests conducted were negative, indicating no evidence of
mutagenic or

genotoxic potential.

<	3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. An oral developmental
toxicity>

study in rat did not reveal any evidence of teratogenic potential. The
maternal and

developmental NOELs were 1000 mg/kg bw/day. An oral developmental
toxicity

study in rabbits demonstrated a maternal NOEL of 100 mg/kg bw/day and
did not

reveal any teratogenic potential. A two-generation study in rats, with a
parental

toxicity NOAEL of 5.2 mg/kg bw/day, did not reveal evidence of a primary

reproductive toxicity potential. The reproductive NOAEL was 26.2 mg/kg
bw/day

based on various clinical and histopathological findings at higher dose
levels. A

LOAEL of 6.5 mg/kg-day was established in a developmental neurotoxicity
study,

based on a decreased retention in the memory phase of the water maze in
PND 60

females.

<	4. Subchronic toxicity. A subchronic toxicity feeding study with rats
over 90

days demonstrated a NOAEL of 32.1 and 8.1 mg/kg bw/day for males and
females,

respectively, based on effects on the lipid metabolism (decrease of
triglycerides and

cholesterol), liver effects (increase in transaminases) and adrenal
effects (vacuolation) at the higher dose levels. A subchronic feeding
study in mice over 13

weeks revealed no clinical toxicological signs. A NOAEL of 30.1 mg/kg
bw/day for

females was observed (a clear NOAEL was not established for males). A
14-week

feeding study in dogs demonstrated a NOAEL of 7.7 mg/kg bw/day.>

<	5. Chronic toxicity. A 24-month combined chronic
feeding/carcinogenicity

study in rats demonstrated a NOAEL of 14.7 mg/kg bw/day. An oncogenicity
study

in the mouse revealed a NOAEL of 4.1 mg/kg bw/day. Uterine and
testicular

oncogenicity was noted in the rat and hepatic neoplasia was observed in
the mouse.

A one-year feeding study with dog demonstrated a NOAEL of 1.38 mg/kg bw
day

based on adrenal effects (vacuolization) as well as changes in
circulating cholesterol

and prostate weight at higher dose levels.>

<	6. Animal metabolism. Metabolism and pharmacokinetic studies in the
rat

demonstrate that spirodiclofen residues are rapidly absorbed,
metabolized and

eliminated. The primary metabolite is the enol, which is formed by
cleavage of the

alkyl ester group, but numerous other metabolites are also formed.>

<	7. Metabolite toxicology. In crop matrices, spirodiclofen is the only
residue of

concern. The residues of concern in livestock tissues are spirodiclofen
and its enol

metabolite. Since the enol is inherently present after administration,
toxicology data

for this metabolite is completely supported by data obtained for
spirodiclofen.>

<	8. Endocrine disruption. The mammalian mode of action for
spirodiclofen

includes that classified as inhibitory to steroid biosynthesis,
resulting in an indirect

and endogenously-mediated toxicological response. Effects do not have an
impact

on fertility, reproduction, developmental or neuropathological
parameters.

Additional mechanistic studies with the chemical indicated that there is
no direct

effect on the endocrine system as there is no interaction with hormone
receptors.>

<C. Aggregate Exposure>

<	1. Dietary exposure. Spirodiclofen has a low acute toxicity via the
oral,

dermal or inhalation route. An endpoint of concern attributable to a
single dose

was not identified in the hazard database; therefore an acute reference
dose was not

established. Chronic dietary analysis was conducted to estimate exposure
to

es. DEEM-FCID™ software (Version 2.14) utilizing the 94-96-98 CSFII
consumption database was used to estimate exposure. Average anticipated
residues, processing factors (where available) and average percent crop
treated values were used in the chronic assessment. The chronic
reference dose of 0.0065 mg/kg-day was based on a chronic LOAEL of 6.5
mg/kg-day from the rat developmental neurotoxicity study and the
application of an uncertainty factor of 1000. The chronic cancer
assessment was based on a Q* of 0.0149 (mg/kg-day)-1. >

<	i. Food. Chronic dietary exposure estimates from residues of
spirodiclofen

for the U.S. population was 0.3% of the cPAD. The population with the
highest

exposure was children 1-2 years with 0.9% of the cPAD utilized. The
chronic

cancer dietary exposure estimate for the general population was 5.81 x
10-7.>

<	ii. Drinking water. To assess chronic risk, drinking water estimates
were

incorporated directly into the dietary analysis (DEEM-FCID residue
file). The chronic estimated environmental concentration (EEC) for
drinking water was based on the PRZM/EXAMS model. The water exposure
assessment was done using the latest EPA modeling tool PE5 and the
latest modeling scenarios.  In the assessment, regional percent crop
areas were used.  The chronic (non-cancer) exposure for spirodiclofen
(total residue including its three metabolites: spirodiclofen-enol,
spirodiclofen-ketohydroxy, and spirodiclofen-dihydroxy) in surface water
was estimated to be 0.98 ppb in surface water. The EEC for chronic
(cancer) exposure in surface water was estimated to be 0.67 ppb.>

<	2. Non-dietary exposure. There are no indoor residential, indoor
commercial

or outdoor residential uses for spirodiclofen.>

<D. Cumulative Effects>

<	Spirodiclofen represents a new class of chemistry, ketoenols. There
are no

data available to indicate that toxic effects produced by spirodiclofen
are a result of

a common mechanism and should be cumulated with those of any other
compound.

EPA has not made a common mechanism of toxicity finding as to
spirodiclofen and

any other substances and spirodiclofen does not appear to product a
toxic

metabolite produced by other substances. Bayer CropScience will submit

information, if necessary, for EPA to consider concerning potential
cumulative

effects of spirodiclofen consistent with the schedule established by EPA
at 62

Federal Register 42020 (Aug. 4, 1997) and other EPA publications
pursuant to the

Food Quality Protection Act. >

<E. Safety Determination>

<	1. U.S. population.[Based on the exposure assessments described above
and

on the completeness and reliability of the toxicity data, it can be
concluded that total

aggregate exposure to spirodiclofen from all label uses as well as the
proposed

blueberry and the corresponding bushberry subgroup use will utilize 0.4
percent of the PAD (Population Adjusted Dose) for chronic dietary
exposures to the U.S. Population and all population subgroups. EPA
generally has no concerns for

exposures below 100 percent of the cPAD, because it represents the level
at or below

which daily aggregate exposure over a lifetime will not pose appreciable
risks to

human health. Cancer aggregate risk was calculated for the U.S.
population only.

The cancer risk estimate with drinking water included was 7.92 x 10 -7.
Since EPA

considers a cancer risk to be greater than negligible when it exceeds
the range of 1-3

in a million, the estimated cancer risk for spirodiclofen is not likely
to exceed the

Agency’s level of concern. Thus, it can be concluded that there is a
reasonable

certainty that no harm will result to the U.S. population from aggregate
exposure to

spirodiclofen residues.>

<	2. Infants and children. The Agency has concluded that there is no
evidence of

increased susceptibility following the in utero and/or
prenatal/postnatal exposure in

the developmental toxicity studies in rabbits and 2-generation
reproduction studies

in rats. A 10X safety factor was retained for the use of a LOAEL of 6.5
mg/kg-day

from a DNT study in calculating the reference dose for chronic risk. The
most

û

ü

Ñ

Ò

&

E

à

ᜀB use being 1.1% of the cPAD for chronic dietary exposures. EPA
generally has no concerns for exposures below 100 percent of the cPAD,
because it represents the level at or below which daily aggregate
exposure over a lifetime will not pose appreciable risks to human
health.

>

<F. International Tolerances>

<	Codex maximum residue levels (MRLs) are not yet established for

spirodiclofen.>

 PAGE

 PAGE   2


[Federal Register: March 7, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 44)]
[Notices]
[Page 10198]
[DOCID:fr07mr07-80]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP07-308-000]

North Baja Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Proposed Change in FERC Gas
Tariff

February 28, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 23, 2007, North Baja Pipeline, LLC
(NBP) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff, Original
Volume No. 1, Fourth Revised Sheet No. 130 and Fourth Revised Sheet No.
134, to become effective March 26, 2007.
    NBP states that these sheets are being submitted to modify the rate
of interest NBP pays on cash security deposits.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3982 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Asphalt (also known as Bitumen) is a black or dark brown solid or
semi-solid thermo-plastic material possessing waterproofing and
adhesive properties. It is a complex combination of higher molecular
weight organic compounds containing a relatively high proportion of
hydrocarbons having carbon numbers greater than C25 with a high carbon
to hydrogen ratio. It is essentially non-volatile at ambient
temperatures with closed cup flash point of 445 [deg]F (230 [deg]C) or
greater.
* * * * *
    Process unit means the equipment assembled and connected by pipes
or ducts to process raw materials and to produce intermediate or final
products from petroleum, unfinished petroleum derivatives, or other
intermediates. A process unit can operate independently if supplied
with sufficient feed or raw materials and sufficient storage facilities
for the product. For the purpose of this subpart, process unit includes
any feed, intermediate and product storage vessels, product transfer
racks, and connected ducts and piping. A process unit includes pumps,
compressors, pressure relief devices, sampling connection systems,
open-ended valves or lines, valves, connectors, instrumentation
systems, and control devices or systems.
    21. Section 60.592 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:

Sec.  60.592  Standards.

* * * * *
    (b) For a given process unit, an owner or operator may elect to
comply with the requirements of paragraphs (b)(1), (2), or (3) of this
section as an alternative to the requirements in Sec.  60.482-7.
    (1) Comply with Sec.  60.483-1.
    (2) Comply with Sec.  60.483-2.
    (3) Comply with the Phase III provisions in 40 CFR 63.168, except
an owner or operator may elect to follow the provisions in Sec.
60.482-7(f) instead of 40 CFR 63.168 for any valve that is designated
as being leakless.
* * * * *
    22. Section 60.593 is amended by:
    a. Revising the first sentence of paragraph (b)(2) and paragraphs
(c) and (d); and
    b. Adding paragraphs (f) and (g) to read as follows:

Sec.  60.593  Exceptions.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (2) Each compressor is presumed not to be in hydrogen service
unless an owner or operator demonstrates that the piece of equipment is
in hydrogen service.* * *
* * * * *
    (c) Any existing reciprocating compressor that becomes an affected
facility under provisions of Sec.  60.14 or Sec.  60.15 is exempt from
Sec.  60.482-3 (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and (h) provided the owner or
operator demonstrates that recasting the distance piece or replacing
the compressor are the only options available to bring the compressor
into compliance with the provisions of Sec.  60.482-3 (a), (b), (c),
(d), (e), and (h).
    (d) An owner or operator may use the following provision in
addition to Sec.  60.485(e): Equipment is in light liquid service if
the percent evaporated is greater than 10 percent at 150 [deg]C as
determined by ASTM Method D86-78, 82, 90, 95, or 96 (incorporated by
reference as specified in Sec.  60.17).
* * * * *
    (f) When Sec. Sec.  60.482(b)(1)(ii), 60.482-7(b)(2), and 60.483-
1(c)(2)(ii) refer to an affected facility as defined in Sec.  60.480,
it means an affected facility as defined in Sec.  60.590 for the
purposes of this subpart.
    (g) Open-ended valves or lines containing asphalt as defined in
Sec.  60.591 are exempt from the requirements of Sec.  60.482-6(a)
through (c).

[FR Doc. E6-18646 Filed 11-6-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: September 6, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 172)]
[Notices]
[Page 51271]
[DOCID:fr06se07-101]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon written request, copies available from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension: Form N-1A; SEC File No. 270-21; OMB Control No. 3235-
0307.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
(``OMB'') a request for extension of the previously approved collection
of information discussed below.
    Form N-1A (17 CFR 239.15A and 274.11A) is the form used by open-end
management investment companies (``funds'') \1\ under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a-1 et seq.) (``Investment Company
Act'') and/or to register their securities under the Securities Act of
1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.) (``Securities Act''). Section 5 of the
Securities Act (15 U.S.C. 77e) requires the filing of a registration
statement prior to the offer of securities to the public and that the
statement be effective before any securities are sold, and Section 8 of
the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-8) requires a fund to
register as an investment company. Form N-1A also permits funds to
provide investors with a prospectus and a statement of additional
information (``SAI'') covering essential information about the fund
when it makes an initial or additional offering of its securities.
Section 5(b) of the Securities Act requires that investors be provided
with a prospectus containing the information required in a registration
statement prior to the sale or at the time of confirmation or delivery
of the securities. The form also may be used by the Commission in its
regulatory review, inspection, and policy-making roles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Management investment companies typically issue shares
representing an undivided proportionate interest in a changing pool
of securities, and include open-end and closed-end companies. See T.
Lemke, G. Lins, A. Smith III, REGULATION OF INVESTMENT COMPANIES,
Vol. I, ch. 4, Sec.  4.04, at 4-5 (2002). An open-end company is a
management company that is offering for sale or has outstanding any
redeemable securities of which it is the issuer. A closed-end
company is any management company other than an open-end company.
See Section 5 of the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-5). Open-
end companies generally offer and sell new shares to the public on a
continuous basis. Closed-end companies generally engage in
traditional underwritten offerings of a fixed number of shares and,
in most cases, do not offer their shares to the public on a
continuous basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission estimates that there are 77 initial registration
statements and 2,320 post-effective amendments to initial registration
statements filed on Form N-1A annually and that the average number of
portfolios referenced in each initial filing and post-effective
amendment is 4.9. The Commission further estimates that the hour burden
for preparing and filing a post-effective amendment on Form N-1A is 111
hours per portfolio. The total annual hour burden for preparing and
filing post-effective amendments is 1,261,848 hours (2,320 post-
effective amendments x 4.9 portfolios x 111 hours per portfolio). The
estimated annual hour burden for preparing and filing initial
registration statements is 313,336 hours (77 initial registration
statements x 4.9 portfolios x 830.47 hours per portfolio). The total
annual hour burden for Form N-1A, therefore, is estimated to be
1,575,184 hours (1,261,848 hours + 313,336 hours).
    The information collection requirements imposed by Form N-1A are
mandatory. Responses to the collection of information will not be kept
confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Please direct general comments regarding the above information to
the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503 or e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief Information

Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley Martinson,
6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, VA, 22312; or send an e-mail to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30 days

of this notice.

    August 27, 2007.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-17575 Filed 9-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19658]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08368]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP15-146-000]

Mountaineer Gas Company, LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory
Order

    Take notice that on March 27, 2015, Mountaineer Gas Company, LLC
pursuant to section 207(a)(2) of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR
385.207(a)(2) (2014) filed a petition for Declaratory Order requesting
the Commission to declare that certain facilities (part of the ``SM-108
System'') in Cabell and Putnam Counties, West Virginia, being acquired
by Mountaineer from Columbia Gas Transmission Company, LLC, (Columbia)
and reconfigured into Mountaineer's local distribution system are
``local distribution'' facilities exempt from the Commission's NGA
jurisdiction pursuant to section 1(b) of the NGA.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2015.

    Dated: April 6, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-08368 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 231 (Friday, November 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 71413]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28958]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 2

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER12-162-006; ER11-3876-008; ER11-2044-009; ER10-
2611-006.
    Applicants: Bishop Hill Energy II LLC, Cordova Energy Company LLC
MidAmerican Energy Company, Saranac Power Partners, L.P.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status under Market-Based Rate
Authority of MidAmerican Energy Company.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12.
    Accession Number: 20121121-5080.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/12/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-443-000
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Queue Position T107, X3-004 & Y2-019--First
Revised SA Nos. 3388 & 3409 to be effective 11/20/2012.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12.
    Accession Number: 20121121-5062.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/12/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-444-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Amended SGIA & DSA to RE Victor Phelan Solar One
Project to be effective 1/21/2013.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12.
    Accession Number: 20121121-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/12/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:
    Docket Numbers: ES13-10-000.
    Applicants: FirstEnergy Service Company, Jersey Central Power &
Light Co.
    Description: First Energy Service Company on behalf of Jersey
Central Power & Light Company submits Emergency Application for
Authorization to Issue Short-Term Debt Securities on a Temporary Basis,
and Requests for Expedited Treatment and Partial Waiver of Filing
Requirements.
    Filed Date: 11/21/12.
    Accession Number: 20121121-5110.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/10/12.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: November 21, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-28958 Filed 11-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


 MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
 DATE:	June 24, 2022
 FROM:	Malbert Smith
                      Legislative Officer
                      Office of Congressional and Intergovernmental Affairs

 SUBJECT:	Meeting with Reps Biggs and Schweikert re: OSHA's
                      proposal to reconsider and revoke final approval of Arizona's state plan.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 On April 21[st], 2022, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) published a proposal to reconsider and revoke the final approval of Arizona's State OSHA plan. The following is a summary of a meeting held today with Reps. Biggs and Schweikert, prepared in accordance with the Department of Labor's ex parte    communication policy. This memorandum will be placed in the rulemaking docket.

ATTENDEES

Department of Labor:
 Jim Frederick
 Richard Cesar
 Mally Smith
 Doug Parker

Rep. Andy Bigg's Office:
 Andy Biggs
 Aaron Calkin

Rep. David Schweikert's Office:
 David Schweikert
 Zack Laven

Rep. Debbie Lesko's Office:
 John Castillo

SUMMARY

Reps. Biggs and Schweikert raised concerns about the potential for revocation of OSHA's final approval of Arizona's State OSHA plan. Their offices have received comments from constituents regarding this issue.  The discussion focused on the justifications and reasoning OSHA used to reach its decision to initiate this process.

Assistant Secretary Parker encouraged the Representatives' offices and their constituents to provide comments to the docket during the comment period.


[Federal Register: February 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 21)]
[Notices]
[Page 5315-5316]
[DOCID:fr01fe06-71]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0008, FRL-8026-9]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Emergency Planning and Release
Notification Requirements Under Emergency Planning and Community Right-
to-Know Act Sections 302, 303, and 304 (Renewal), EPA ICR Number
1395.06, OMB Control Number 2050-0092

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information
Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an
existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated
burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before March 3, 2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2005-0008, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail

to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Superfund
Docket, Mail Code 5305T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC
20460, and (2) OMB by mail to: Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer
for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sicy Jacob, 5104A, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On September 12, 2005 (70 FR 53793), EPA sought comments on
this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received one comment during
the comment period, which is addressed in the ICR. Any additional
comments on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days
of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-2005-0008, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Superfund Docket in

the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from
8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.
The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Superfund Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
http://www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the

index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA receives

them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted
material, CBI, or other information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further information about the electronic
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov.

    Title: Emergency Planning and Release Notification Requirements
under Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act Sections 302,
303, and 304 (Renewal).
    ICR number: EPA ICR No. 1395.06, OMB Control No. 2050-0092.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on February 28, 2006.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The authority for these requirements is sections 302,
303, and 304 of the Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
(EPCRA), 1986 (42 U.S.C. 11002, 11003, and 11004). EPCRA established
broad emergency planning and facility reporting requirements. Section
302 requires facilities to notify their state emergency response
commission (SERC) that the facility is subject to emergency planning.
This activity has been completed; this ICR covers only new facilities
that are subject to this requirement. Section 303 requires the local
emergency planning committees (LEPCs) to prepare emergency plans for
facilities that are subject to section 302. This activity has been also
completed; this ICR only covers any updates needed for these emergency
response plans. Section 304 requires facilities to report to SERCs and
LEPCs releases in excess of the reportable quantities listed for each
extremely hazardous substance

(EHS). This ICR also covers the notification and the written follow-up
required under this section.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and are identified on
the form and/or instrument, if applicable.
    Burden Statement: As explained in the supporting statement, EPA
does not expect any new facilities to come into compliance during this
ICR period. This ICR only covers periodic reporting or updates of
information submitted previously by existing facilities. The average
reporting burden for a limited number of existing facilities to inform
the LEPC of any changes at the facility that may affect emergency
planning is 1.50 hours. The average reporting burden for facilities
reporting releases under 40 CFR 355.40 is estimated to average
approximately 5 hours per release, including the time for determining
if the release is a reportable quantity, notifying the LEPC and SERC,
or the 911 operator, and developing and submitting a written follow-up
notice. There are no record keeping requirements for facilities under
EPCRA Sections 302-304. The total burden to facilities over three years
is 229,473 hours at a cost of $11.1 million, and the annual burden to
facilities is 76,491 hours $3.7 million.
    The average burden for emergency planning activities is 21 hours
per plan for LEPCs, and 16 hours per plan for SERCs. Each SERC and LEPC
is also estimated to incur an annual record keeping burden of 10 hours.
The total burden to SERCs and LEPCs over three years is 320,568 hours
at a cost of $8.1 million. The annual LEPC and SERC burden is 106,856
hours and $2.7 million.
    Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time
needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to
comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements
which have subsequently changed; train personnel to be able to respond
to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise
disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are those which have a threshold planning quantity of an
extremely hazardous substance (EHS) listed in 40 CFR part 355, Appendix
A and those which have a release of any of the EHS above a reportable
quantity. Entities more likely to be affected by this action may
include chemical manufacturers, non-chemical manufacturers, retailers,
petroleum refineries, utilities, etc.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 84,815.
    Frequency of Response: Occasionally.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 183,347.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $6,428,000, includes $0 annualized
capital costs, $27,000 annual O&M costs, and $6,401,000 annual labor
costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: The estimated average annual burden for
both the affected facilities and the SERCs and LEPC has decreased from
the previous ICR by 29,113 hours. This includes a decrease to
facilities from 88,188 hours per year under the previous ICR to 76,491
hours per year under this ICR. The estimated burden to affected
facilities has declined from the previous ICR because no new facilities
will be subject to the regulations during this ICR period. Therefore,
the burden or costs were not calculated for compliance for new
facilities. Labor costs have risen for currently covered facilities
because we used the most recent wage rates (March 2005). The estimated
average burden for SERCs and LEPCs decreased from 124,272 hours to
106,856 hours because the number of plans reviewed by SERCs annually
has been reduced based on information from states that indicate that
the level of review has declined from the early years of the program.

    Dated: January 20, 2006.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E6-1351 Filed 1-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 32 (Friday, February 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10389-10390]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03414]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2020-1046]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of a Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Federal
Aviation Regulation Part 119--Certification: Air Carriers and
Commercial Operators

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was
published on November 4, 2020. Organizations that desire to become or
remain certified as air carriers or commercial operators are mandated
to report information to the FAA. The information collected reflects
requirements necessary under parts 135, 121, and 125 to comply with
Federal Aviation Regulation part 119--Certification: Air Carriers and
Commercial Operators. The FAA will use the information it collects and
reviews to ensure compliance and adherence to regulations and, if
necessary, to take enforcement action on violators of the regulations.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by March 22, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Hanes by email at:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity

of the information collection; and (d) ways that the burden could be
minimized without reducing the quality of the collected information.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0593.
    Title: Federal Aviation Regulation part 119--Certification: Air
Carriers and Commercial Operators.
    Form Numbers: N/A.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on November 4, 2020 (85 FR 70222). One comment was
received, however it was political in nature and does not relate to
this information collection. The request for clearance reflects
requirements necessary under parts 135, 121, and 125 to comply with
part 119. The FAA will use the information it collects and reviews to
ensure compliance and adherence to regulations and, if necessary, to
take enforcement action on violators of the regulations.
    Respondents: 1,695 Air Carrier and Commercial Operators.
    Frequency: Varies per Requirement.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 5,174.5 Hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: $155,016.73.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 16, 2021.
Sheri A. Martin,
Management and Program Analyst, FAA, Air Transportation Division, AFS-
200.
[FR Doc. 2021-03414 Filed 2-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 172 (Tuesday, September 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 61271]
[FR Doc No: 2016-21255]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-78720; File No. SR-FICC-2016-003]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed Income Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on
Proposed Rule Change to Describe the Blackout Period Exposure Charge
That May Be Imposed on GCF Repo Participants

August 30, 2016.
    On July 12, 2016, the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (``FICC'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'')
proposed rule change SR-FICC-2016-003 pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\2\ The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on July 21, 2016.\3\ To date, the Commission has
not received comments on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-78347 (July 15,
2016), 81 FR 47466 (July 21, 2016) (SR-FICC-2016-003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is September 4, 2016. The Commission is extending this 45-day time
period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to provide the Commission with sufficient time to consider
the proposed rule change, the Commission finds that it is appropriate
to designate a longer period within which to take action on the
proposed rule change. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to section
19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ designates October 19, 2016 as the date by
which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change
(File No. SR-FICC-2016-003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-21255 Filed 9-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 183 (Friday, September 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 53106]
[FR Doc No: 2021-20662]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4486-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

Florida; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4486-DR), dated March 25, 2020, and
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued August 5, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
dated March 25, 2020 for the State of Florida is hereby amended to
include the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

    All areas within the State of Florida are eligible for
assistance under the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-20662 Filed 9-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 70 (Thursday, April 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21655-21657]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08469]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69322; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2013-061]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Rule 4120

April 5, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on April 1, 2013, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ proposes to adopt NASDAQ Rule 4120(c)(7)(D) concerning the
extension of the Display Only Period conducted prior to the IPO Halt
Cross under NASDAQ Rule 4753. The Exchange has designated the proposed
changes herein as immediately effective.
    The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new
language is underlined; proposed deletions are in brackets.
4120. Trading Halts
    (a)-(b) No change.
    (c) Procedure for Initiating a Trading Halt
    (1)-(6) No change.
    (7)
    (A) A trading halt or pause initiated under Rule 4120(a)(1), (4),
(5), (6), (9), (10), (11) or Rule 4120(b) shall be terminated when
Nasdaq releases the security for trading. Prior to terminating the
halt, there will be a 5-minute Display Only Period during which market
participants may enter quotations and orders in that security in Nasdaq
systems. At the conclusion of the 5-minute Display Only Period, the
security shall be released for trading unless Nasdaq extends the
Display Only Period for an additional 1-minute period pursuant to
subparagraph (C) below. At the conclusion of the Display Only Period,
trading shall immediately resume pursuant to Rule 4753.
    (B) A trading halt initiated under Rule 4120(a)(7) shall be
terminated when Nasdaq releases the security for trading. Prior to
terminating the halt, there will be a 15-minute Display Only Period
during which market participants may enter quotes and orders in that
security in Nasdaq systems. In addition, beginning at 7 a.m., market
participants may enter Market Hours Day Orders in a security that is
the subject of an Initial Public Offering on Nasdaq and designate such
orders to be held until the beginning of the Display Only Period, at
which time they will be entered into the system. At the conclusion of
the 15-minute Display Only Period, the security shall be released for
trading unless Nasdaq extends the Display Only Period for up to six
additional 5-minute Display Only Periods pursuant to subparagraph (C)
or (D) below. At the conclusion of the Display Only Period(s), there
shall be an additional delay of between zero and 15 seconds (randomly
selected) and then trading shall resume pursuant to Rule 4753.
    (C) If at the end of a Display Only Period, Nasdaq detects an order
imbalance in the security, Nasdaq will extend the Display Only Period
as permitted under subparagraphs (A) and (B) above. Order imbalances
shall be established when (i) the Current Reference Prices, as defined
in Rule 4753(a)(2)(A), disseminated 15 seconds and immediately prior to
the end of the Display Only Period differ by more than the greater of 5
percent or 50 cents, or (ii) all buy or sell market orders will not be
executed in the cross.
    (D) At any time within the last five minutes prior to the end of a
Display

Only Period, Nasdaq may extend the Display Only Period as permitted
under subparagraph (B) above at the request of an underwriter of an
IPO.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to adopt Rule 4120(c)(7)(D) to describe an
additional basis for extending the Display Only Period as permitted by
Rule 4120(c)(7)(B), and is making a conforming change to Rule
4120(c)(7)(B). Rule 4120(c)(7)(B) governs the orderly launch of trading
of a company's securities approved for listing on NASDAQ in an initial
public offering (``IPO''). Rule 4120(c)(7)(B), provides a fifteen-
minute ``Display Only Period'' prior to terminating the halt imposed on
an IPO security before it opens for trading for the first time on
NASDAQ pursuant to the IPO Halt Cross of Rule 4753. Under Rule
4120(c)(7)(B), at the conclusion of the fifteen-minute Display Only
Period NASDAQ may extend the period for up to six additional five-
minute Display Only Periods, pursuant to the basis described under Rule
4120(c)(7)(C). Rule 4120(c)(7)(C) allows an extension when NASDAQ
detects an order imbalance in the security.
    In May 2007, nearly a year after the launch of the IPO Halt Cross,
NASDAQ determined to change its internal procedures to consider
requests by underwriting firms involved in an IPO to extend the Display
Only Period by five minutes, up to a maximum of six five-minute
extensions. NASDAQ made the change based on its experience with
operating the IPO process and in an effort to ensure the orderly
operation of the IPO process. NASDAQ found that underwriters possess
valuable information about the pending IPO given their unique position
in the market, including the state of IPO orders resting on the
underwriter's book, and believed that it is in the best interest of the
markets to extend the 15-minute Display Only Period upon the request of
a market maker. Accordingly, pursuant NASDAQ's internal procedures it
relies on the underwriter's reasonable judgment as to whether a five-
minute extension of the Display Only Period will improve the price
discovery process of the IPO Halt Cross, and thereby help to ensure a
fair and orderly launch of trading in the IPO security.
    NASDAQ is amending its rules to memorialize the underwriter-
requested extension process under Rule 4120(c)(7)(D). NASDAQ developed
criteria for determining whether to grant an underwriter-requested
extension of the Display Only Period, and applies such criteria
consistently in every IPO wherein an underwriter makes an extension
request. NASDAQ may change such criteria from time to time in the
interest of improving the IPO process for market participants.
    NASDAQ notes that other markets also recognize the importance of
allowing underwriters to extend the IPO auctions of their markets. For
example, BATS Exchange, Inc. permits an extension to its IPO Auction
Quote-Only period upon the request of an underwriter, with no limit on
the number or length of extensions. Affording underwriters the ability
to request an extension is consistent with NASDAQ's goal of promoting a
fair and orderly market and NASDAQ believes that it is appropriate to
include its long-standing procedure in its rules. Doing so will provide
market participants with a better understanding the operation of the
Display Only Period of the IPO process. Accordingly, NASDAQ is
proposing to adopt new Rule 4120(c)(7)(D) to reflect that it may
consider the request of an underwriter of an IPO to extend the Display
Only Period by five minutes, up to a maximum six five-minute
extensions.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\3\ in general, and with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\4\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transaction in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest, and is not
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers. The proposed rule change promotes this goal by
establishing in NASDAQ's rules an IPO process that protects investors
and the public interest by ensuring an orderly opening of trading in
IPOs on NASDAQ. NASDAQ believes that underwriters of IPOs have unique
insight into the investor interest in the IPO, and therefore are
uniquely positioned to evaluate the book and make extension decisions
to ensure an orderly IPO launch. NASDAQ notes that the criteria it
applies in considering an underwriter-requested extension are applied
consistently to every IPO, and therefore do not permit NASDAQ to
discriminate in any manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The
Exchange believes that the proposal is irrelevant to competition
because it is not driven by, nor impactful to, competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \5\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii).
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \7\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to

Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \8\ the Commission may designate a shorter time
if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-
day operative delay so that the proposal may become operative
immediately upon filing. NASDAQ believes that waiving the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest because the proposed rule change provides an additional
means by which NASDAQ may extend the Display Only Period, which is in
the interest of providing a fair and orderly launch of trading in an
IPO security. The Exchange also notes that other markets allow
underwriter-requested extensions of their pre-IPO quote periods. The
Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as
it may aid in the fair and orderly launch of trading in an IPO
security. For this reason, the Commission designates the proposed rule
change to be operative upon filing.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \9\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the
Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2013-061 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2013-061. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2013-061 and should
be submitted on or before May 2, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-08469 Filed 4-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 160 (Tuesday, August 19, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 48961-48962]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19017]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-1327; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-47-AD;
Amendment 39-17934; AD 2014-16-10]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding airworthiness directive (AD) 2013-12-01 for
all Rolls-Royce plc (RR) model RB211 Trent 768-60, 772-60, and 772B-60
turbofan engines. AD 2013-12-01 required a one-time ultrasonic
inspection (UI) of low-pressure (LP) compressor blades with more than
2,500 flight cycles since new or last inspection. This AD requires
initial and repetitive UIs of the affected LP compressor blades. This
AD was prompted by LP compressor blade partial airfoil release events.
We are issuing this AD to prevent LP compressor blade airfoil
separations, damage to the engine, and damage to the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective September 23, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of September
23, 2014.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby DE24 8BJ, UK; phone: 44 0 1332
242424; fax: 44 0 1332 249936. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2012-
1327; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information,
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is Document
Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Green, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2013-12-01, Amendment 39-17478 (78 FR 37703,
June 24, 2013), (``AD 2013-12-01''). AD 2013-12-01 applied to the
specified products. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on May
23, 2014 (79 FR 29694). The NPRM proposed to require initial and
repetitive UIs of the affected LP compressor blades.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (79 FR 29694, May 23,
2014).

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 56 engines installed on airplanes
of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about 44 hours per
engine to comply with the initial inspection requirements in this AD.
The average labor rate is $85 per hour. Based on these figures, we
estimate the cost of this AD on U.S. operators to be $209,440.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2013-12-01, Amendment 39-17478 (78 FR 37703, June 24, 2013), and adding
the following new AD:

2014-16-10 Rolls-Royce plc: Amendment 39-17934; Docket No. FAA-2012-
1327; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-47-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective September 23, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2013-12-01, Amendment 39-17478 (78 FR
37703, June 24, 2013).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Rolls-Royce plc (RR) model RB211 Trent 768-
60, 772-60, and 772B-60 turbofan engines, with low-pressure (LP)
compressor blade, part numbers (P/Ns) FK23411, FK25441, FK25968,
FW11901, FW15393, FW23643, FW23741, FW23744, KH23403, or KH23404,
installed.

(d) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by LP compressor blade partial airfoil
release events. We are issuing this AD to prevent LP compressor
blade airfoil separations, engine damage, and damage to the
airplane.

(e) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions.

 (1) Ultrasonic Inspection (UI) of LP Compressor Blade

    (i) After the effective date of this AD, ultrasonically inspect
each LP compressor blade before the blade exceeds 3,600 cycles since
new (CSN) or before further flight, whichever occurs later. Repeat
the UI of the blade every 2,400 cycles since last inspection (CSLI).
    (ii) For any LP compressor blade that exceeds 2,200 CSLI on the
effective date of this AD, inspect the blade before exceeding 3,000
CSLI or before further flight, whichever occurs later. Thereafter,
perform the repetitive inspections required by this AD.
    (iii) Use paragraph 3, excluding subparagraphs 3.A.(9), 3.B.(5),
3.C.(4), 3.D.(3), 3.E.(5), 3.F.(10), and 3.G.(7), of RR Alert Non-
Modification Service Bulletin (NMSB) RB.211-72-AH465, dated July 15,
2013, to perform the inspections required by this AD.

(2) Use of Replacement Blades

    LP compressor blades, P/Ns FK23411, FK25441, FK25968, FW11901,
FW15393, FW23643, FW23741, FW23744, KH23403, or KH23404, that have
accumulated at least 3,600 CSN or 2,400 CSLI are eligible for
installation if the blade has passed the UI required by this AD.

(f) Credit for Previous Actions

    If you performed a UI of an affected LP compressor blade before
the effective date of this AD using RR NMSB No. RB.211-72-G702,
dated May 23, 2011; or RR NMSB No. RB.211-72-G872, Revision 2, dated
March 8, 2013, or earlier revisions; or RR NMSB No. RB.211-72-H311,
dated March 8, 2013; or Engine Manual E-Trent-1RR, Task 72-31-11-
200-806, you have met the initial inspection requirements of this
AD. However, you must still comply with the repetitive 2,400 CSLI
requirement of this AD.

(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, may approve AMOCs for
this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request.

(h) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Robert Green,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2014-0031,
dated February 4, 2014, for more information. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2012-1327-0007.

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Rolls-Royce plc Alert Non-Modification Service Bulletin No.
RB.211-72-AH465, dated July 15, 2013.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For RR service information identified in this AD, contact
Rolls-Royce plc, P.O. Box 31, Derby DE24 8BJ, UK; phone: 44 0 1332
242424; fax: 44 0 1332 249936.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 1, 2014.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Assistant Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-19017 Filed 8-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P