[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5190-5193]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00585]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2020-0689; FRL-10018-16-OLEM]

Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Land Disposal
Restrictions; Information for Petitioners Seeking a No-Migration
Variance Under the RCRA Land Disposal Restrictions for Temporary
Placement of Treated Hazardous Waste Within a Permitted Subtitle C
Landfill

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is requesting
comment on guidance on petitions for a No Migration Variance (NMV)
under the Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) pursuant to the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Under existing regulations,
persons may apply for an NMV to allow for the land placement (e.g.,
landfill, impoundment, waste pile) of hazardous waste that, if
approved, would allow for the placement of hazardous waste in such a
unit where the waste does not meet applicable LDR treatment standards.
This guidance provides information to persons applying for an NMV for a
waste pile temporarily located within a RCRA-permitted landfill cell.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 18, 2021.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OLEM-2020-0689, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov/
(our preferred method). Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket
Center, Office of Land and Emergency Management Docket, Mail Code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery/Courier: EPA Docket Center, WJC West
Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004.
The Docket Center's hours of operations are 8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m.,
Monday-Friday (except Federal Holidays).
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this notice. Comments received may be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public Participation''
heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bethany Russell, Waste
Characterization Branch, Materials Recovery and Waste Management
Division, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery (5304P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation

A. Docket

    EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OLEM-2020-0689. All documents in the docket are listed in the
https://www.regulations.gov index. Publicly available docket materials
are available either electronically at https://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the EPA Docket Center. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding holidays.
The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and
the telephone number for the EPA Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    EPA is temporarily suspending its Docket Center and Reading Room
for public visitors, with limited exceptions, to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID-19. Our Docket Center staff will continue to provide
remote customer service via email, phone, and webform. We encourage the
public to submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov/ as there may
be a delay in processing mail. Hand deliveries or couriers will be
received by scheduled appointment only. For further information and
updates on EPA Docket Center services, please visit us online at
https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), local area
health departments, and our Federal partners so that we can respond
rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID-19.

B. Written Comments

    Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2020-
0689, at https://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or the
other methods identified in the ADDRESSES section. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from the docket. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish
to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission
methods, the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

C. Submitting CBI

    Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI
electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or email. Send or
deliver information identified as CBI to only the following address:
ORCR Document Control Officer, Mail Code 5305-P, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460;
Attn: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OLEM-2020-0689.
    Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to
be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD-ROM that you mail to EPA,
mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as CBI and then identify
electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the specific information that
is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment
that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that
does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for
inclusion in the public docket. If you submit a CD-ROM or disk that
does not contain CBI, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM clearly
that it does not contain CBI. Information marked as CBI will not be
disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in Title 40 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 2.

II. General Information

A. Purpose of This Notice

    The Land Disposal Restrictions (LDRs) are a key part of the
hazardous waste regulatory program under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA) and require that hazardous wastes meet certain
treatment standards prior to land disposal. If these standards are not
met, land disposal of the waste is prohibited. The RCRA statute and
implementing regulations allow land disposal of hazardous waste not
meeting applicable treatment standards where a No Migration Variance
(NMV) is approved by EPA. An NMV is a formal decision that can be
rendered by EPA in response to a petition filed with the Agency, to
allow the land disposal at a particular facility of specific prohibited
waste, i.e., a waste not meeting the applicable LDR treatment
standards. In Section III of this notice, EPA is providing information
for persons who may wish to apply for an NMV for one or more temporary
waste piles, where treated hazardous waste that is expected to meet LDR
standards is temporarily stored within the boundary of a hazardous
waste landfill prior to moving that waste within the landfill to its
final disposal or removing it for further treatment.

B. Background

    The regulatory requirements for an NMV under the RCRA LDRs were
first established in 1986,\1\ and in 1992, EPA issued guidance on these
requirements.\2\ The 1992 guidance is applicable to landfills, surface
impoundments, and waste piles, and also acknowledges temporary
placement of waste under an approved NMV; however, the guidance did not
address the specific situation identified in this notice where
temporary piles of treated waste are placed within the boundary of a
RCRA-permitted hazardous waste landfill.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 51 FR 40572, November 7, 1986.
    \2\ No Migration Variances to the Hazardous Waste Land Disposal
Prohibitions: A Guidance Manual for Petitioners, EPA Office of Solid
Waste, July 1992, EPA-530-R92-023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Some commercial hazardous waste landfill facilities offer services
for treating hazardous waste in addition to providing landfill
disposal. In determining the appropriate treatment, facilities evaluate
the incoming waste streams to identify the best treatment strategy
(e.g., type and quantity of reagents, mixing times). Facilities rely on
information in waste profiles provided by generators, waste
characterization conducted by the facility (including characterization
specified in their Waste Analyses Plan or WAP), as well as familiarity
with waste streams (e.g., if a waste stream is received on a routine
basis from the same source). Once treated, facilities may store the
treated (e.g., stabilized) waste temporarily in units such as tanks,
containers or containment buildings to allow the treated waste to
``cure'' and/or to confirm that the treated waste meets the applicable
LDR standards. The treated waste is then moved into the landfill for
disposal.
    EPA is aware that some facilities have established procedures
whereby a pile of treated hazardous waste is temporarily staged within
the boundaries of the permitted subtitle C landfill while awaiting
confirmation by the facility through testing results that the treatment
program is performing as expected and that the treated waste meets the
applicable LDR standards. Where the treated waste is confirmed to meet
the LDR standards, the pile is moved to the ``working face'' of the
landfill for final disposal. If there is an exceedance of an LDR
standard, the pile is picked up and returned to the treatment process
for further treatment. Any instance where a pile does not meet the
applicable LDR standards and has not been granted an NMV would be a
violation of the LDR requirements--the hazardous waste must either meet
the LDR standards, or an approved NMV must be in place.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Memorandum from Barnes Johnson to EPA Regional Division
Directors, April 11, 2014; https://rcrapublic.epa.gov/files/14843.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. The NMV Process

    The NMV petition submittal and decision process is found in 40 CFR
268.6. Review and approval of an NMV petition is delegated to the EPA
Regional Administrator for the EPA Region in which the waste management
unit is located. EPA does not authorize states to implement the NMV
authority. As part of the petition process, EPA may request additional
information from the petitioner to evaluate the demonstration. EPA will
provide notice in the Federal Register of the intent to approve or deny
the NMV petition with an opportunity for public comment. The final
decision is to be published in the Federal Register, and petitions to
renew must undergo notice and comment procedures as well. An NMV that
has been issued can be revoked for cause, including if migration
occurs. Once approved, the term of an NMV shall be no longer than the
term of the RCRA subtitle C permit for a permitted disposal unit, and
no longer than 10 years for a unit operating under interim status. The
1992 guidance should be

considered a resource for preparation of any submittal, in addition to
the considerations described here for which EPA is requesting comment.

III. NMV for Temporary Waste Piles Within a Subtitle C Landfill

    EPA is requesting comment on the information provided below. The
contents of the guidance document do not have the force and effect of
law and the Agency does not bind the public in any way and intends only
to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under
the law or Agency policies, except as authorized by law or as
incorporated into a contract. This information is not a substitute for
compliance with 40 CFR 268.6, but provides additional information in
the specific situation where hazardous waste is treated and then is
temporarily stored in piles within a permitted subtitle C landfill,
prior to either transfer to the working face of the landfill, or
removal for retreatment if necessary.

A. Demonstration Addressed by This Guidance

    This guidance addresses how to make a demonstration that the
treated waste and constituents will not migrate beyond the temporary
waste pile. The RCRA statutory language requires a demonstration ``to a
reasonable degree of certainty, that there will be no migration of
hazardous constituents from the disposal unit or injection zone for as
long as the waste remains hazardous'' (RCRA Sec.  3004(d)(1)). EPA has
interpreted this language to mean that it must be demonstrated, to a
reasonable degree of certainty, that hazardous constituents will not
exceed Agency-approved health-based levels (or environmentally
protective levels, if they are appropriate) beyond the boundary of the
disposal unit. While it is EPA's interpretation that man-made barriers
or engineered systems (e.g., liner systems) alone generally will not
meet the ``no migration'' standard, this is not the case for temporary
land-based storage of treated waste as is being considered in this
document. The containment of hazardous waste within engineered barriers
can be considered in making the ``no migration'' demonstration for
waste awaiting the results of verification sampling after treatment,
provided that wastes are to be removed after a reasonably short storage
period that may be conservatively projected to be well before the
failure of the engineered barrier system.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ No Migration Variances to the Hazardous Waste Land Disposal
Prohibitions: A Guidance Manual for Petitioners, EPA Office of Solid
Waste, July 1992, EPA-530-R92-023.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Information To Be Submitted to EPA

    EPA expects that petitioners will be able to take advantage of
existing facility information (e.g., existing monitoring, inspections,
engineered barriers, waste analyses), where appropriate, as part of any
demonstration. In developing an NMV petition, a petitioner must satisfy
the no migration criteria set forth in 40 CFR 268.6, and petitioners
should describe any and all controls that will be applied to the
temporary waste pile to prevent the migration of hazardous constituents
from the pile, and, the monitoring that will be used to detect
migration at the earliest practicable time. For example, the use of
temporary barriers, such as plastic covers above and below the piles;
visual monitoring and prompt responses to possible releases; and
generally good housekeeping practices that ensure the treated waste
remains in the pile during the temporary storage period would be
elements to consider. Attributes of the permitted landfill cell (e.g.,
design, existing controls, monitoring) in which the pile or piles are
located should also be taken into account to the extent that they
support the demonstration criteria being applied to the piles
themselves. In other words, if a particular control or requirement is
in place for the landfill cell, and can prevent potential releases from
the pile or piles, it should be described in the petition (and
petitioners should specify how that control or requirement prevents
migration from the boundary of the temporary waste pile).
    The regulations in 40 CFR 268.6(a) describe the components of what
a demonstration must address; Sec.  268.6(b) specifies certain criteria
that must be satisfied for that demonstration, and Sec.  268.6(c)
describes the monitoring program that will be used to verify that the
conditions of the NMV are being met. The components for an NMV
demonstration outlined in Sec.  268.6(a) are:
     Descriptions of the specific waste(s) and specific unit
for which the demonstration will be made;
     Waste analysis describing the chemical and physical
characteristics of the waste;
     Comprehensive characterization of the disposal unit site,
including air, soil, and water quality;
     Monitoring plan to detect migration at the earliest
practicable time;
     Sufficient information to assure EPA that the owner/
operator of the unit receiving the wastes will comply with other
applicable federal, state, and local laws.
    Below are some considerations regarding these components with
respect to NMV petition submittals for piles temporarily storing waste
within a subtitle C landfill that has been treated with the expectation
that it meets the applicable LDR standards for permanent disposal in
the landfill.
    Facility Description--The NMV petition should include a description
of the hazardous waste management facility where the waste will be
treated, temporarily stored, and permanently disposed in sufficient
detail to familiarize the reviewer with its overall operation. This
type of information and level of detail will be similar to those
included in the facility's RCRA permit application. The facility name,
mailing address, and physical location should be provided, together
with information on a point of contact for correspondence concerning
the petition. Detailed design, layout, and operating plans should be
provided for the unit covered by the petition. Unit descriptions should
focus on waste isolation capabilities of the unit.
    Unit(s) Covered by the NMV--While the temporary waste piles
addressed in this document are located within the boundaries of the
RCRA-permitted landfill cell, the unit to which the variance applies,
as envisioned in this guidance, is the pile itself. The information
presented here is for a demonstration that the treated waste and
constituents will not migrate beyond the temporary waste pile. Where
different piles containing different types of treated hazardous waste
are simultaneously staged within the landfill cell, each pile should be
described and will be evaluated, as necessary, individually by EPA in
order to properly assess potential releases when evaluating petitions,
and for evaluating the monitoring that will be part of implementing any
approved variance. Where multiple piles contain the same or similar
wastes, the petition can address these units as a group. For example,
where two or more piles are similar in terms of the nature and
concentration of constituents, treatment used, waste matrices, etc.,
the petition need not separately specify or discuss such information
for each individual pile where such piles are effectively being managed
as a single unit. Similarly, where the design, inspection, and
monitoring of the pile coverings and liners that will be used to
prevent releases from the piles are the same for multiple piles, such
information on each individual pile need not be specified. In other
words, a successful petition could include several categories of
treated waste piles, but sufficient

information must be included so that the potential for releases, and
proposed inspection and monitoring, can be evaluated by EPA.
    While the unit(s) to be evaluated under this guidance are the
temporary waste piles, petitioners should also submit information
related to the landfill to the extent the information aids in any
demonstration that hazardous constituents will not migrate beyond the
boundary of the temporary waste pile. For example, hazardous waste
landfill design and operating requirements (40 CFR 264.301) include
run-on and run-off controls that may be important in any demonstration
that hazardous waste will not migrate from the pile. The specific
location of where the temporary waste piles will be placed within the
landfill cell should be identified in the petition, together with any
pertinent information as to why this location was selected and how it
will prevent the migration of hazardous constituents from the pile.
These locations will be identified as part of any approved variance.
    This document only applies where wastes managed in the temporary
waste piles have been treated with the expectation that the waste meets
the applicable LDR standards for permanent disposal in the landfill. A
facility should include information about what types and quantities of
waste are to be managed in the temporary waste piles and what treatment
standards apply. Most of this information is presumed to already be
available as part of the facility's WAP and associated program for
sampling and monitoring for compliance with the LDRs.
    Duration of Temporary Storage--The NMV is necessary to ensure that
any temporary storage of treated hazardous waste complies with the
stringent statutory and regulatory standards in those instances where
the hazardous waste that was treated and placed in a temporary waste
pile does not meet LDRs. The approach described in this document is
conditioned upon the temporary nature of the storage of treated
hazardous waste within the landfill, and is intended for situations
where the temporary waste piles are used as part of an overall strategy
to confirm consistent and compliant treatment that meets the applicable
LDR treatment standards.
    The petition should include a description of the length of time the
waste is managed in the pile before either transfer to the working face
of the landfill, or removal for retreatment, if necessary. A range of
time may be provided, but EPA emphasizes that the temporary nature of
the pile must be clearly characterized in the petition, such as through
maximum storage times or other procedures described in the application,
that may become part of the conditions established in an approved
variance.
    However, if any particular staging location routinely receives
treated waste that does not meet applicable LDR standards, then the
``temporary'' aspect of storage for a given location may be called into
question, which could affect the ability for EPA to grant the NMV. This
also raises the separate question of whether the overall treatment
process is operating as well as it should. Therefore, it is important
for the petition to describe in sufficient detail the procedures used
to treat, test, and confirm that wastes meet LDR standards, and how
this information will be used to determine when a pile will be removed
either for retreatment, or for final disposal. Such information should
be available as part of the facility's WAP and may include:
     Number and type (e.g., random grab) of samples taken after
treatment for LDR compliance;
     Methodology used to select number and type of samples;
     Level of confidence that all waste is treated to LDR
treatment standards (level of confidence related to number of samples
achieving LDRs);
     List of regulated constituents (suite of metals, selected
organics, cyanide).
    Monitoring Plan--40 CFR 268.6(a)(4) requires a petition to include
a monitoring plan to verify continued compliance with the conditions of
the no migration variance. Pursuant to 40 CFR 268.6(a)(4), the
monitoring plan must be designed to detect migration ``at the earliest
practicable time.'' 40 CFR 268.6(c) lays out the specific information
required in the monitoring plan. In addition to these requirements, the
monitoring plan should also describe the sampling and analysis of the
treated waste that determines when the temporary waste pile will be
moved to the working face of the landfill for final disposal. The
demonstration should allow EPA to understand the process and timing of
LDR treatment and confirmation that LDRs are met; this is fundamental
to defining the scope and duration of storing treated waste
temporarily.

Peter Wright,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Land and Emergency Management.
[FR Doc. 2021-00585 Filed 1-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 239 (Thursday, December 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64139-64141]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26935]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2018-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1870]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice lists communities where the addition or
modification of Base Flood Elevations (BFEs), base flood depths,
Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries or zone designations, or
the regulatory floodway (hereinafter referred to as flood hazard
determinations), as shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and
where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS)
reports, prepared by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
each community, is appropriate because of new scientific or technical
data. The FIRM, and where applicable, portions of the FIS report, have
been revised to reflect these flood hazard determinations through
issuance of a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR), in accordance with Federal
Regulations. The LOMR will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings. For rating purposes, the currently
effective community number is shown in the table below and must be used
for all new policies and renewals.

DATES: These flood hazard determinations will be finalized on the dates
listed in the table below and revise the FIRM panels and FIS report in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of notification of these
changes in a newspaper of local circulation, any person has 90 days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Associate
Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation reconsider the changes. The
flood hazard determination information may be changed during the 90-day
period.

ADDRESSES: The affected communities are listed in the table below.
Revised flood hazard information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current
effective FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for
comparison.
    Submit comments and/or appeals to the Chief Executive Officer of
the community as listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The specific flood hazard determinations are
not described for each community in this notice. However, the online
location and local community map repository address where the flood
hazard determination information is available for inspection is
provided.
    Any request for reconsideration of flood hazard determinations must
be submitted to the Chief Executive Officer of the community as listed
in the table below.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    The FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified
for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
    These flood hazard determinations, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are
required. They should not be construed to mean that the community must
change any existing ordinances that are more stringent in their
floodplain management requirements. The community may at any time enact
stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by
other Federal, State, or regional entities. The flood hazard
determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    The affected communities are listed in the following table. Flood
hazard determination information for each community is available for
inspection at both the online location and the respective community map
repository

address listed in the table below. Additionally, the current effective
FIRM and FIS report for each community are accessible online through
the FEMA Map Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

David I. Maurstad,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation, Department
of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Chief executive                           Online location of
        State and  county          Location and  case       officer of         Community map         letter of map            Date of         Community
                                          No.               community            repository             revision            modification         No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
California:
    Riverside...................  City of Riverside    The Honorable Rusty  Planning and         https://msc.fema.gov/  Feb. 6, 2019.......       060260
                                   (18-09-1163P).       Bailey, Mayor,       Building             portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        City of Riverside,   Department, 3900
                                                        3900 Main Street,    Main Street,
                                                        Riverside, CA        Riverside, CA
                                                        92522.               92501.
    Santa Clara.................  City of San Jose     The Honorable Sam    Department of        https://msc.fema.gov/  Mar. 7, 2019.......       060349
                                   (18-09-1360P).       Liccardo, Mayor,     Public Works, 200    portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        City of San Jose,    East Santa Clara
                                                        200 East Santa       Street, 3rd Floor,
                                                        Clara Street, 18th   San Jose, CA 95113.
                                                        Floor, San Jose,
                                                        CA 95113.
Florida:
    Broward.....................  City of Hollywood    The Honorable Josh   City Hall, 2600      https://msc.fema.gov/  Feb. 22, 2019......       125113
                                   (18-04-1751P).       Levy, Mayor, City    Hollywood            portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        of Hollywood, 2600   Boulevard,
                                                        Hollywood            Hollywood, FL
                                                        Boulevard, Room      33022.
                                                        419, Hollywood, FL
                                                        33022.
    St. Johns...................  Unincorporated       Mr. Henry Dean,      St. Johns County     https://msc.fema.gov/  Feb. 28, 2019......       125147
                                   Areas of St. Johns   Chairman, St.        Administration       portal/advanceSearch.
                                   County (18-04-       Johns County Board   Building, 4020
                                   3472P).              of Commissioners,    Lewis Speedway,
                                                        St. Johns County     St. Augustine, FL
                                                        Administration,      32084.
                                                        500 San Sebastian
                                                        View, St.
                                                        Augustine, FL
                                                        32084.
    St. Johns...................  Unincorporated       Mr. Henry Dean,      St. Johns County     https://msc.fema.gov/  Mar. 1, 2019.......       125147
                                   Areas of St. Johns   Chairman, St.        Administration       portal/advanceSearch.
                                   County (18-04-       Johns County Board   Building, 4020
                                   4670P).              of Commissioners,    Lewis Speedway,
                                                        St. Johns County     St. Augustine, FL
                                                        Administration,      32084.
                                                        500 San Sebastian
                                                        View, St.
                                                        Augustine, FL
                                                        32084.
Indiana: Allen..................  City of Fort Wayne   The Honorable Tom    Department of        https://msc.fema.gov/  Feb. 22, 2019......       180003
                                   (18-05-2605P).       Henry, Mayor, City   Planning Services,   portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        of Fort Wayne,       200 East Berry
                                                        Citizens Square,     Street, Suite 150,
                                                        200 East Berry       Fort Wayne, IN
                                                        Street, Suite 420,   46802.
                                                        Fort Wayne, IN
                                                        46802.
Kansas: Johnson.................  City of Lenexa (18-  The Honorable        City Hall, 12350     https://msc.fema.gov/  Mar. 13, 2019......       200168
                                   07-1607P).           Michael Boehm,       West 87th Street     portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        Mayor, City of       Parkway, Lenexa,
                                                        Lenexa, 8522         KS 66215.
                                                        Caenen Lake Court,
                                                        Lenexa, KS 66215.
Minnesota: Washington...........  City of Lake Elmo    The Honorable Mike   City Hall 3800       https://msc.fema.gov/  Mar. 7, 2019.......       270505
                                   (18-05-3738P).       Pearson, Mayor,      Laverne Avenue       portal/advanceSearch.
                                                        City of Lake Elmo,   Lake Elmo, MN
                                                        2805 Lisbon Avenue   55042.
                                                        North, Lake Elmo,
                                                        MN 55042.
Virginia: Fairfax...............  Unincorporated       Mr. Bryan J. Hill,   Fairfax County       https://msc.fema.gov/  Mar. 6, 2019.......       515525
                                   Areas of Fairfax     County Executive,    Stormwater           portal/advanceSearch.
                                   County (18-03-       12000 Government     Planning, 12000
                                   1811P).              Center Parkway,      Government Center
                                                        Suite 552,           Parkway, Suite
                                                        Fairfax, VA 22035.   449, Fairfax, VA
                                                                             22035.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-26935 Filed 12-12-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P