[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13158-13159]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06121]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
     Rule 11a-3, SEC File No. 270-321, OMB Control No. 3235-0358

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and
Budget a request for extension of the previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
    Section 11(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') (15
U.S.C. 80a-11(a)) provides that it is unlawful for a registered open-
end investment company (``fund'') or its underwriter to make an offer
to the fund's shareholders or the shareholders of any other fund to
exchange the fund's securities for securities of the same or another
fund on any basis other than the relative net asset values (``NAVs'')
of the respective securities to be exchanged, ``unless the terms of the
offer have first been submitted to and approved by the Commission or
are in accordance with such rules and regulations as the Commission may
have prescribed in respect of such offers.'' Section 11(a) was designed
to prevent ``switching,'' the practice of inducing shareholders of one
fund to exchange their shares for the shares of another fund for the
purpose of exacting additional sales charges.
    Rule 11a-3 (17 CFR 270.11a-3) under the Act of 1940 is an exemptive
rule that permits open-end investment companies (``funds''), other than
insurance company separate accounts, and funds' principal underwriters,
to make certain exchange offers to fund shareholders and shareholders
of other funds in the same group of investment companies. The rule
requires a fund, among other things, (i) to disclose in its prospectus
and advertising literature the amount of any administrative or
redemption fee imposed on an exchange transaction, (ii) if the fund
imposes an administrative fee on exchange transactions, other than a
nominal one, to maintain and preserve records with respect to the
actual costs incurred in connection with exchanges for at least six
years, and (iii) give the fund's shareholders a sixty day notice of a
termination of an exchange offer or any material amendment to the terms
of an exchange offer (unless the only material effect of an amendment
is to reduce or eliminate an administrative fee, sales load or
redemption fee payable at the time of an exchange).
    The rule's requirements are designed to protect investors against
abuses associated with exchange offers, provide fund shareholders with
information necessary to evaluate exchange offers and certain material
changes in the terms of exchange offers, and enable the Commission
staff to monitor funds' use of administrative fees charged in
connection with exchange transactions.
    The staff estimates that there are approximately 1,606 active open-
end investment companies registered with the Commission as of September
2017. The staff estimates that 25 percent (or 402) of these funds
impose a non-nominal administrative fee on exchange transactions. The
staff estimates that the recordkeeping requirement of the rule requires
approximately 1 hour annually of clerical time per fund, for a total of
402 hours for all funds.
    The staff estimates that 5 percent of these 1,606 funds (or 80)
terminate an exchange offer or make a material change to the terms of
their exchange offer each year, requiring the fund to comply with the
notice requirement of the rule. The staff estimates that complying with
the notice requirement of the rule requires approximately 1 hour of
attorney time and 2 hours of clerical time per fund, for a total of
approximately 240 hours for all funds to comply with the notice
requirement. The staff estimates that such notices will be enclosed
with other written materials sent to shareholders, such as annual
shareholder reports or account statements, and therefore any burdens
associated with mailing required notices are accounted for in the
burdens associated with Form N-1A registration statements for funds.
The recordkeeping and notice requirements together therefore impose a
total burden of 642 hours on all funds. The total number of respondents
is 482, each responding once a year. The burdens associated

with the disclosure requirement of the rule are accounted for in the
burdens associated with the Form N-1A registration statement for funds.
    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act, and is not derived from a
comprehensive or even a representative survey or study of the costs of
Commission rules and forms. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following website, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
[email protected]; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to: [email protected]. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

     Dated: March 22, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-06121 Filed 3-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


FILE NAME: company. wpt ( 1/ 1/ 2005) ( xml) Template Number P25 ATTENTION:

All commodity terms must comply with the Food and Feed Commodity Vocabulary database ( http:// www. epa. gov/ pesticides/ foodfeed/).

All text in blue font ( instructions for preparing the document), should be removed prior to sending the document to the Federal Register Staff. Instructional text and prompts in green font should also be removed.

COMPANY FEDERAL REGISTER DOCUMENT SUBMISSION TEMPLATE ( 1/ 1/ 2005)

EPA Registration Division contact: [ insert name and telephone number with area code]

INSTRUCTIONS: Please utilize this outline in preparing tolerance petition documents. In cases where the outline element does not apply please insert " NA Remove" and maintain the outline. The comment notes that appear on the left margin represent hidden typesetting codes designed to expedite the processing of the Federal Register document. Please do not remove or alter these comment notes or change the margins, font, or format in your document. Simply replace the instructions that appear in italics and brackets, i. e., "[ insert company name]," with the information specific to your action.

TEMPLATE:

[ Insert company name]

[ Insert petition number]

EPA has received a pesticide petition ([ insert petition number]) from [ insert company name], [ insert address] proposing, pursuant to section 408( d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act ( FFDCA), 21 U. S. C. 346a( d), to amend 40 CFR part 180.

Options ( pick one)

1. by establishing a tolerance for residues of 2. to establish an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for [ diuron] in or on the raw agricultural commodity [ prickly pear cactus] at [ insert tolerance level] 2 parts per million ( ppm). EPA has determined that the petition contains data or information regarding the elements set forth in section 408( d)( 2) of the FFDCA; however, EPA has not fully evaluated the sufficiency of the submitted data at this time or whether the data supports granting of the petition. Additional data may be needed before EPA rules on the petition.

A. Residue Chemistry 1. Plant metabolism. [ The metabolism of diuron in plants and animals from the results of wheat, corn, orange, ruminant, and poultry studies together with the environmental fate studies conducted in soil and water and has identified the following 14C containing residues in plants: diuron, 3,4 dichlorophenylurea ( DCPU), and 3( 3,4 dichlorophenyl) 1 methylurea ( DCPMU). No other dichloroaniline containing metabolites were identified. The majority of radioactivity in the aqueous/ organic fractions was characterized as polar unknowns. Radiovalidation of a GC/ ECD data collection method, which is similar to the enforcement method, suggested that a good portion of these polar metabolites can be converted to 3,4 DCA.]

2. Analytical method. [ An analytical method is available, a modified form of DuPont Agricultural Products method # 5470. The principle of the determination is the hydrolysis of diuron and its metabolites by alkaline reflux to 3,4 dichloroanaline ( 3,4 DCA), followed by a distillation of the aniline into an acid solution. The acid distillate is made alkaline with concentrated base and subsequently extracted into an organic solvent ( hexane) and analyzed by gas chromatography. With the modified method, recoveries exceeded 70% and the limit of quantitation ( LOQ) is 0.01 < greek m> g/ g .]

3. Magnitude of residues. [ A field trial was conducted in California in 1984 with diuron on prickly pear cactus in order to determine efficacy and to obtain treated samples for residue analysis. One application of diuron at the rates of 2.4 lbs active ingredient per acre ( 1X) and 4.8 lb active ingredient per acre ( 2X) were sprayed on established prickly pear cactus. Samples were harvested 3,7 and 22 days after treatment were analyzed.

The cactus pear samples were shipped to Morse Laboratories in Sacramento, CA for residue analysis. No residues of diuron were present in cactus pear greater than sensitivity of the analytical method ( 0.01 ppm). Samples were not analyzed until one year after treatment; however, storage fortification data is available for diuron in Rhubarb ( EPA petition PP 5E 3275) and wheat. Seven months after fortification, an average 88% was recovered from the Rhubarb. Diuron was very stable in wheat, an average of 90% was recovered at 12 months when wheat was spiked with 100 ppb diuron. 3 The nature of the residues is adequately understood and an adequate analytical method is available for enforcement purposed. Based on the above information, the fact that there are no animal feed items involved and prickly pear is a minor part of the diet; the establishment of the tolerance would protect the public health.]

B. Toxicological Profile 1. Acute toxicity. [ Diuron has low acute toxicity ( Toxicity Category 3 or 4) by the oral, dermal, or inhalation exposure routes. Diuron is not an eye or skin irritant, and not a skin sensitizer. A rat metabolism study indicated that diuron is rapidly absorbed and metabolized within 24 hours post dose at the low dose and within 48 hours post dose at the high dose. The urine is the major route of excretion in both sexes. A small amount of diuron is detected in the feces. The highest tissue residue levels were found in the liver and kidneys 4 days post 14Cdiuron dose. The metabolism of diuron involved N oxidation, some ring hydroxylation, demethylation, dechlorination, and conjugation to sulfate and glucuronic acid.]

2. Genotoxicty. [

i. Salmonella typhimurium reverse gene mutation assay ( MRID# 00146608/ 40228805): Independent trials were negative.

ii. Chinese Hamster Ovary ( CHO)/ HGPRT) cell forward gene mutation assay ( MRID# 00146609): Independent tests were negative up to cytotoxic doses with/ without S9 activation.]

3. Reproductive and developmental toxicity. [ There is an acceptable developmental toxicity study in rabbits and an acceptable twogeneration reproduction study in rats. A developmental toxicity study in rats was classified as unacceptable due to deficiencies in analytical data on the sample analysis; however, the Agency considered the developmental toxicity study in rats adequate for the FQPA susceptibility assessment based on the observation that the developmental toxicity NOAEL was higher than the maternal NOAEL and concluded that a developmental neurotoxicity ( DNT) study is not required. There is no indication of increased susceptibility to young exposed to diuron in the available studies. In the developmental toxicity study in rabbits, there were no developmental effects at the highest dose tested. In the developmental toxicity study in rabbits and in the 2 generation rat reproduction study, developmental/ offspring effects were observed only at maternally/ parentally toxic dose levels.] 4 4. Subchronic toxicity. [ The primary diuron target sites are blood, bladder, and kidney. Erythrocyte ( red blood cell) damage resulted in hemolytic anemia and compensatory hematopoiesis, which are manifested as significantly decreased erythrocyte counts, hemoglobin levels, and hematocrit, and increased mean corpuscular volume ( MCV), mean corpuscular hemoglobin ( MCH), abnormal erythrocyte forms, reticulocyte counts, and leukocyte count. Consistent observations of erythocytic regeneration are seen in chronic toxicity studies in rats, mice and dogs. Gross pathology findings in chronic rat and mouse studies showed increased incidences of urinary bladder swelling and wall thickening at high doses. Microscopic evaluation showed dose related increases in the severity of epithelial focal hyperplasia of the urinary bladder and renal pelvis ( kidney) in both sexes. Although the developmental toxicity study in rats is classified as unacceptable, the database as a whole is adequate for pre and post natal toxicity evaluation and did not reveal developmental or reproductive toxicity. The NOAELs for maternal/ parental toxicity were either less than or equal to the NOAELs for fetal or reproductive toxicity. A complete summary of the toxicity database is discussed in the document titled " Diuron  Phase 2: Revised Toxicology Disciplinary Chapter for the Reregistration Eligibility Decision," dated March 6, 2002.]

5. Chronic toxicity. [ EPA has established the RfD for diuron at 0.003 mg/ kg/ day. This RfD is based on a 2 year chronic feeding/ oncogenicity study in the rat with a LOAEL of 1.02 mg/ kg/ day and an uncertainty factor ( UF) of 300 ( additional UP of 3 for the use of a LOAEL) based on decreased erythrocyte count in females, increased hemodiderin in the spleen, increased spleen weight, bone marrow activation, increased hematopoietic marrow, decreased fat marrow (% surface area of fat marrow in bone marrow) and thickened urinary bladder wall in males.]

6. Animal metabolism. [ Livestock Commodities: The 14C containing residues that were identified in lactating goats were as follows. The principal residue identified was DCPU which comprised 10% of TRR in milk, 27% of TRR in fat, 35% of TRR in kidney, 23% of TRR in liver, and 22% of TRR in muscle. The parent and other dichloroaniline containing metabolites ( i. e., 3,4 DCA and DCPMU) were detected in trace quantities ( 0.01 ppm each) except in liver ( 0.12 ppm). Four minor ( each 6% of TRR) hydroxylated metabolites ( 2 OH DCA; 2 OH DCPU; 2 OHDCPMU; and N acetyl 2 OH DCA) were also detected; these metabolites were not observed in plants and would not be determined by the enforcement method. The major portion of radioactive residues in milk was comprised of several conjugated polar components which collectively accounted for 56% of TRR. These polar components also accounted for substantial portions of the total radioactivity in liver ( collectively 25% of TRR) and kidney ( collectively 23% of TRR). Attempts to further elucidate the nature of these polar materials using various techniques ( e. g., enzyme digestions, heat treatment) 5 were not successful.

Poultry: The 14C containing residues that were identified in laying hens were as follows. DCPU, which comprised 45% of TRR in liver, 67 75% of TRR in muscle, 47% of TRR in skin with fat, 57% of TRR in egg yolk, and 54% of TRR in egg white. The parent, other dichloroaniline containing metabolites ( i. e., DCPMU), and hydroxylated metabolites ( 2 OHdiuron 2 OH DCA, 2 OH DCPU, 2 OHDCPMU, and N acetyl 2 OH DCA) were identified only in trace quantities ( mostly at 0.01 ppm each). Adequate radiovalidation data were submitted for the proposed enforcement method for animal commodities. The GC method recovered 86 to > 100% of the TRR in liver, kidney, and muscle; however, the method recovered only 10% of the TRR in milk and 25% of the TRR in fat. The low recovery in milk was previously addressed ( DP Barcodes D195058 and D195068, 11/ 30/ 93, R. Perfetti). It was concluded that because the major portion of radioactive residues in milk appear to be hydroxy metabolites, which cannot be converted to DCA and do need not be quantitated, a new method would not be required for milk. Instead, it was determined that the levels of diuron residues in milk identified in the ruminant feeding study would be multiplied by 10 to account for all of the exposure in the risk assessment. The low recovery in fat was most likely due to the low residue levels present in fat. In a separate radiovalidation study, the GC method recovered 62 to 77% of the TRR in poultry liver and muscle, and 58 to 65% of the TRR in egg whites and yolks.]

7. Metabolite toxicology. [ A rat metabolism study indicated that diuron is rapidly absorbed and metabolized within 24 hours post dose at low dose and within 48 hours postdose at high dose. The urine is the major route of excretion in both sexes. A small amount of diuron is detected in the feces. No apparent difference was observed between single and multiple low oral doses. There was no apparent sex related difference in either absorption or elimination. Metabolism of diuron involved N oxidation, ring hydroxylation, demethylation, dechlorination, and conjugation to sulfate and glucuronic acid. The major urine metabolite was IN R915 ( 3,4 dichlorophenylurea), which accounted for > 20% of the total administered dose. Other metabolites were glucuronide conjugates, sulfate conjugates and free metabolites.]

8. Endocrine disruption. [ At this time, neither the available submitted studies on diuron nor the literature show any indication of endocrine disruption effects.]

C. Aggregate Exposure 6 1. Dietary exposure. [ There are no adverse effects attributed to a single exposure identified in any available studies. In addition, diuron has low acute toxicity and no developmental or neurotoxic concerns. Therefore, no acute dietary endpoint was chosen and no acute dietary risk assessment was conducted. Diuron is a preplant, pre or post emergent herbicide, used on a variety of fruits, vegetables, nuts and field crops. Tolerances are established for residues of Diuron in or on food commodities at levels ranging from 0.1 ppm to 7 ppm ( 40 CFR 180.106).]

i. Food. [ Estimated chronic dietary ( food) risk estimates associated with the use of diuron do not exceed the Agency's level of concern (> 100% cPAD) for any population subgroup including the most highly exposed population subgroup, children ages 1 6 years. The chronic dietary risk for children ages 1 6 years is 7% of the chronic PAD and 3% for the general U. S. population. Orange juice and orange juice concentrate are the largest contributors to dietary exposure from diuron. The estimated cancer dietary risk associated with the use of diuron indicates a borderline exceedance above 1 x 10 6 ( i. e., probability greater than one in one million) and shows a lifetime risk estimate of 1.68 x 10 6 for the general population but is not of concern. There are no adverse effects attributed to a single exposure identified in any available studies. In addition, diuron has low acute toxicity and no developmental or neurotoxic concerns. Therefore, no acute dietary endpoint was chosen and no acute dietary risk assessment was conducted.]

ii. Drinking water. Environmental laboratory studies have shown that in drinking water only, diuron partially degrades to another chemical referred to as MCPDMU ( N'( 3 chlorophenyl) N, N dimethyl urea). However, the environmental fate and persistence of MCPDMU are uncertain. MCPDMU is structurally similar to monuron [ N'( 4 chlorophenyl) N, N dimethyl urea], a pesticide no longer registered in the United States. Monuron produces tumors in the kidney and liver in male rats and has a Q1* of 1.52 x 10 2. Due to the structural similarity between MCPDMU and monuron, the Agency believes it is prudent to evaluate the carcinogenic risk associated with MCPDMU based upon the hazard information concerning the chemical monuron. The Agency believes MCPDMU is likely less toxic than monuron, but is unable to quantify this difference without further information. The approach used in this assessment yields a high end estimate. Absent information specifically about the carcinogenic potential of MCPDMU, the Agency has taken this conservative, health protective approach in its assessment. The Agency is addressing this uncertainty by requiring additional information about the behavior and fate of diuron and its drinking water degradate, MCPDMU. Two separate cancer risk assessments were completed for diuron and MCPDMU ( N'( 3 chlorophenyl) N, N dimethyl urea), a degradate of diuron in water only. Because the cancer effects ( i. e., target organs) for the two compounds differ, the 7 risks from diuron and MCPDMU are not combined. Based on a Q1* of a similar compound, monuron, the estimated dietary risk for MCPDMU is 1.02 x 10 7, which includes catfish consumption only. The anticipated residue of MCPDMU in catfish was calculated using the 2 ppm tolerance for catfish, the fraction of applied radioactive diuron converted to MCPDMU in an aerobic aquatic metabolism study and the percent crop treated for catfish. Neither diuron nor monuron are regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act. As a result, neither Maximum Contaminant Levels ( MCLs) nor drinking water health advisories ( HAs) for these chemicals have been established by the EPA Office of Water. However, diuron was placed on a list of contaminants to be monitored during 2001 and 2002. This information will be used to support EPA decisions concerning whether or not to regulate and establish standards for diuron in drinking water..]

2. Non dietary exposure. [ Because of the low percent of paint containing diuron, exposure to home applicators is not likely to be a significant contributor to aggregate risk. Calculated diuron potential cancer risks from food and residential applicator exposure ( paints and stains) show a slight exceedance of the Agency's level of concern, 1 x 10 6. Both assessments include conservative exposure assumptions. In both cases additional data will allow for refinement of the exposure portion of the assessment.]

D. Cumulative Effects [ EPA did not perform a cumulative risk assessment of diuron because the Agency has not determined that there are any other chemical substances that have a mechanism of toxicity common with that of diuron.]

E. Safety Determination 1. U. S. population. [ In its July, 2002 TRED, EPA determined that the established uses for diuron, with amendments and changes as specified in that document, met the safety standard under the FQPA amendments to section 408( b)( 2)( D) of the FFDCA, that there is a reasonable certainty of no harm for the general population. In reaching this determination, EPA considered all available information on the toxicity, use practices, and scenarios, and the environmental behavior of diuron. An acute dietary risk assessment was not performed because no adverse effects attributed to a single exposure were identified in any available study. For chronic ( non cancer) risk from food alone, the risks from diuron are not of concern. The estimated cancer dietary risk associated with the use of diuron indicates a slight exceedance above 1 x 10 6 and shows a lifetime risk estimate of 1.68 x 10 6 for the general population. However, the Agency has determined that potential dietary cancer risk is not of concern because the residues used in the calculations are from field trials 8 conducted at the highest application rates and some residue processing data are still outstanding. Therefore, the exposure calculation is a conservative estimate. Acute risks from drinking water exposures are not of concern. For chronic drinking water risk, drinking water monitoring data from Florida, California, and the U. S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Assessment ( NAWQA) Program were used to determine the estimated environmental concentrations ( EECs) in surface water. These monitoring data confirm that actual concentrations of diuron are substantially less than previous model estimates. Although modeled estimates showed only a marginal exceedance of the WLOC, monitoring data show 84 concentrations substantially below the chronic DWLOC. Shortterm residential exposures to diuron are not of concern. The Agency has concluded that the potential cancer risk from residential use is negligible because of the low volume of diuron used in paint and the sporadic, short term duration of homeowner exposures.]

2. Infants and children. [ In its July 2002 TRED, EPA determined that the established tolerances for diuron, meet the safety standards under the FQPA amendments to section 408( b)( 2)( C) of the FFDCA, that there is a reasonable certainty of no harm for infants and children. The safety determination for infants and children considered the factors noted above for the general population, but also takes into account the possibility of increased dietary exposure due to the specific consumption patterns of infants and children, as well as the possibility of increased susceptibility to the toxic effects of diuron residues in this population subgroup. In determining whether or not infants and children are particularly susceptible to toxic effects from diuron residues, EPA considered the completeness of the database for developmental and reproductive effects, the nature of the effects observed, and other information. The FQPA Safety Factor has been removed ( i. e., reduced to 1x) for diuron because: 1) there is no indication of quantitative or qualitative increased susceptibility of rats or rabbits to in utero or postnatal exposure; 2) a DNT study with diuron is not required; and 3) the dietary ( food and drinking water) and non dietary ( residential) exposure assessments will not underestimate the potential exposures for infants and children.]

F. International Tolerances [ The Codex Alimentarius Commission has not established or proposed Codex MRLs for residues of diuron; therefore, there are no issues pertaining to harmonization of U. S. tolerance with Codex MRLs.

Canadian tolerances ( from PMRA web site) include the following: 7 ppm in/ on asparagus 1 ppm in/ on citrus, corn, grapes, pineapple, potatoes and wheat.

Mexican tolerances ( from 1992 Diuron Residue Chemistry Registration Standard Update) are 9 established for diuron as follows:

7 ppm in/ on asparagus 4 ppm in/ on dry citrus pulp 2 ppm in/ on alfalfa, corn ( forage), sorghum ( forage), wheat ( straw, forage) 1ppm in/ on artichoke, cottonseed, sugarcane, citrus fruit, apple, corn grain, peaches, potatoes, pears, pineapple, sorghum ( grain), wheat ( grain and straw) and grapes. 0.5 ppm in/ on papaya 0.1 ppm in/ on nuts.]


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 142 (Tuesday, July 24, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 43281-43282]
[FR Doc No: 2012-18021]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[OCS-EPA-R4008; OCS-EPA-R4009; OCS-EPA-R4007-M1; FRL-9701-2]

Notice of Issuance of Final Air Permits for BHP Billiton
Petroleum, Inc., Murphy Exploration and Production Co., and Eni US
Operating Co., Inc.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice is to announce that on May 11, 2012, EPA issued a
final Outer Continental Shelf (OCS) air permit for Murphy Exploration
and Production Co. (Murphy), and on May 30, 2012, EPA issued a final
OCS air permit for BHP Billiton Petroleum, Inc., (BHPB). These permits
became effective on June 11, 2012, and June 30, 2012, respectively. In
addition, EPA issued a final OCS air permit modification for Eni US
Operating Company, Inc. (Eni) on May 8, 2012 that was effective on May
11, 2012.
    The Murphy permit regulates air pollutant emissions from the
Diamond Offshore Ocean Confidence drilling vessel and support vessels,
which Murphy intends to operate within lease block Lloyd Ridge 317 on
the OCS in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately 135 miles southeast of the
mouth of the Mississippi River and 180 miles south of the nearest
Florida coast.
    The BHPB permit regulates air pollutant emissions from one of two
drilling vessels owned by Transocean, either the C.R. Luigs or the
Development Driller 1, and support vessels, which BHPB intends to
operate in multiple locations in BHPB's DeSoto Canyon lease blocks on
the OCS in the Gulf of Mexico, approximately 120 miles southeast of the
mouth of the Mississippi River and 125 miles from the nearest Alabama
and Florida coast.
    The Eni permit regulates air pollutant emissions from the
Transocean Pathfinder drilling vessel and support vessels, which Eni
intends to operate within lease block Lloyd Ridge 411 on the OCS in the
Gulf of Mexico, approximately 154 miles southeast of the mouth of the
Mississippi River and 189 miles south of the nearest Florida coast. All
three operations will last less than two years, and based on applicable
permitting regulations, are ``temporary sources'' for permitting
purposes.

ADDRESSES: The final permits, EPA's response to the public comments for
the Murphy and BHPB permits, and additional supporting information are
available at http://www.epa.gov/region4/air/permits/index.htm. Copies
of the final permits and EPA's response to comments are also available
for review at EPA Regional Office and upon request in writing. EPA
requests that you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to
4:30 excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Kelly Fortin, Air Permits Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
Region 4, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Ms. Fortin can also be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 29, 2012, the EPA Region 4
Office requested public comments on a proposal to issue an OCS air
permit for Murphy. During the public comment period, which ended on
March 30, 2012, EPA received comments from Murphy. Also, on April 4,
2012, the EPA Region 4 Office requested public comments on a proposal
to issue an OCS air permit for BHPB. During the public comment period,
which ended on May 7, 2012, EPA received comments from BHPB. EPA
carefully reviewed each of the comments submitted, and after
consideration of the expressed view of all interested persons, the
pertinent federal statutes and regulations, the applications and
additional material relevant to the applications and contained in the
administrative record, EPA made a decision in accordance with 40 CFR
52.21, 40 CFR part 71 (in the case of BHPB) and 40 CFR part 55 to issue
the final OCS permits.
    On March 23, 2012, EPA Region 4 requested public comments on a
preliminary determination to grant Eni's request, pursuant to 40 CFR
55.7, for an exemption for two crane engines from 40 CFR part 60
subpart IIII (NSPS for Stationary Compression Ignition Internal
Combustion Engines), which resulted in an OCS air permit minor
modification for Eni. EPA received no comments during the public
comment period, which ended on April 23, 2012. EPA determined in
accordance with 40 CFR 52.21, 40 CFR part 71 and 40 CFR part 55 to
grant Eni's exemption request and finalize the proposed minor permit
modification.
    Under 40 CFR 124.19(f)(2), notice of any final Agency action
regarding a prevention of significant deterioration (PSD) permit must
be published in the Federal Register. Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA
provides for review of final Agency action that is locally or
regionally applicable in the United States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit. Such a petition for review of final Agency action
must be filed within 60 days from the date of notice of such action in
the Federal Register. For purposes of judicial review under the CAA,
final Agency action occurs when a final PSD permit is issued or denied
by EPA and Agency review procedures are exhausted, per 40 CFR
124.19(f)(1).
    Any person who filed comments on the draft Murphy permit was
provided the opportunity to petition the Environmental Appeals Board by
June 11, 2012, and any person who filed comments on the draft BHPB
permit was provided the opportunity to petition the Environmental
Appeals Board by June 30, 2012. No petitions were submitted; therefore
the Murphy permit became effective on June 11, 2012, and the BHPB
permit became effective of June 30, 2012. No person filed comments on
the draft Eni permit modification; therefore the permit became
effective on May 11, 2012.

    Dated: July 5, 2012.
Douglas Neeley,
Acting Director, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, Region
4.
[FR Doc. 2012-18021 Filed 7-23-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 58 (Monday, March 29, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16302-16303]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06467]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0159]

Safety Zone; Coast Guard Exercise Area, Hood Canal, Washington

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce safety zones surrounding vessels

involved in Coast Guard training exercises in Hood Canal, WA, from May
24, 2021, through May 28, 2021. This enforcement is necessary to ensure
the safety of the maritime public and vessels near training exercises.
During the enforcement period, entry into the safety zones is
prohibited, unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or their
Designated Representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1339 will be enforced from 8 a.m.
on May 24, 2021, through 5 p.m. on May 28, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email CWO2 William Martinez, Sector
Puget Sound Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
206-217-6051, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety
zones around vessels involved in Coast Guard training exercises in Hood
Canal, WA, set forth in 33 CFR 165.1339, from 8 a.m. on May 24, 2021,
through 5 p.m. on May 28, 2021. Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.1339, no person or vessel may enter or remain within 500 yards of
any vessel involved in Coast Guard training exercises while such vessel
is transiting Hood Canal, WA, between Foul Weather Bluff and the
entrance to Dabob Bay, unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or
their Designated Representative. In addition, the regulation requires
all vessel operators seeking to enter any of the zones during the
enforcement period to first obtain permission. You may seek permission
by contacting the on-scene patrol commander on VHF channel 13 or 16, or
the Sector Puget Sound Joint Harbor Operations Center at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You will be able to identify participating vessels as those flying
the Coast Guard Ensign. The Captain of the Port may also be assisted in
the enforcement of the zone by other federal, state, or local agencies.
The Captain of the Port will issue a general permission to enter the
safety zones if the training exercise is completed before 5 p.m. on May
28, 2021. In addition to this notice of enforcement in the Federal
Register, the Coast Guard plans to provide notification of this
enforcement period via a Local Notice to Mariners.

    Dated: March 24, 2021.
P.M. Hilbert,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Puget Sound.

[FR Doc. 2021-06467 Filed 3-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: June 1, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 105)]
[Notices]
[Page 30590-30591]
[DOCID:fr01jn07-88]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0072; FRL-8131-1]

Pesticide Products; Registration Applications

AGENCY:  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  This notice announces receipt of applications to register
pesticide products containing new active ingredients not included in
any currently registered products pursuant to the provisions of section
3(c)(4) of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act
(FIFRA), as amended.

DATES:  Comments must be received on or before July 31, 2007.

ADDRESSES:  Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0072, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
     Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001.
     Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South
Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation (8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays). Special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-
2006-0072. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the docket without change and may be made available on-line at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through regulations.gov or e-
mail. The Federal regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access''
system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through
regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the docket and made
available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters,
any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the docket index
available in regulations.gov. To access the electronic docket, go to
http://www.regulations.gov, select ``Advanced Search,'' then ``Docket

Search.'' Insert the docket ID number where indicated and select the
``Submit'' button. Follow the instructions on the regulations.gov web
site to view the docket index or access available documents. Although
listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either in the
electronic docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available

in hard copy, at the OPP Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S-4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
hours of operation of this Docket Facility are from 8:30 a.m. to 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Docket
telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Eugene Wilson, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket.
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for preparing your comments. When submitting comments,
remember to:
    i. Identify the document by docket ID number and other identifying
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to
specific questions or organize comments by referencing a Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    iii. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and
substitute language for your requested changes.
    iv. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information
and/or data that you used.
    v. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be
reproduced.
    vi. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns and
suggest alternatives.
    vii. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of
profanity or personal threats.
    viii. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period
deadline identified.

II. Registration Applications

    EPA received applications as follows to register pesticide products
containing active ingredients not included in any previously registered
products pursuant to the provision of section 3(c)(4) of FIFRA. Notice
of receipt of these applications does not imply a decision by the
Agency on the applications.

Products Containing Active Ingredients not Included in any Previously
Registered Products

    1. File Symbol: 264-ILO. Applicant: Bayer CropScience, P.O. Box
12014, 2 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709.
Product name: AE 0172747 Technical. Product type: Herbicide. Active
ingredient: 2-[2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-3-[2,2,2-
trifluoroethoxy)methyl]benzoyl]-1,3 cyclohexanedione) at 96.2%.
Proposal classification/Use: Field and silage corn, seed corn, sweet
corn and popcorn.
    2. File Symbol: 264-IAN. Applicant: Bayer CropScience. Product
name: Laudis Herbicide. Product type: Herbicide. Active ingredient: 2-
[2-chloro-4-(methylsulfonyl)-3-[2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)methyl]benzoyl]-
1,3 cyclohexanedione) at 34.5%. Proposal classification/Use: Field and
silage corn, seed corn, sweet corn and popcorn.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Pesticides and pest.

    Dated: May 17, 2007.
Daniel J. Rosenblatt,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-10519 Filed 5-31-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register: September 30, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 189)]
[Notices]
[Page 57309]
[DOCID:fr30se05-116]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[FEMA-1604-DR]

Mississippi; Amendment No. 4 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and
Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-1604-DR), dated August 29, 2005, and
related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: September 21, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Acting Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response,
Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as
amended, Vice Admiral Thad Allen, of the United States Coast Guard is
appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared
disaster.
    This action terminates my appointment of William L. Carwile, III as
Federal Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034,
Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management
Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049,
Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050,
Individuals and Households Program--Other Needs; 97.036, Public
Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)
R. David Paulison,
Acting Under Secretary, Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department
of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 05-19632 Filed 9-29-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-10-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 119 (Friday, June 20, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35408-35410]
[FR Doc No: 2014-14129]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice of actions on Special Permit Applications.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR Part 107,
Subpart 13), notice is hereby given of the actions on special permits
applications in (May to May 2014). The mode of transportation involved
are identified by a number in the ``Nature of Application'' portion of
the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail freight, 3--Cargo
vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying aircraft,
Application numbers prefixed by the letters EE represent applications
for Emergency Special Permits. It should be noted that some of the
sections cited were those in effect at the time certain special permits
were issued.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on: June 12, 2014.
Donald Burger,
Chief, Special Permits and Approvals Branch.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Nature of special
     S.P No.         Applicant      Regulation(s)      permit thereof
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                   MODIFICATION SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
12184-M.........  Weldship         49 CFR           To modify the
                   Corporation      180.209(a),      special permit to
                   Bethlehem, PA.   180.205(c),      authorize
                                    (f), (g) and     accordance with ISO
                                    (i), UN          11120, update the
                                    cylinders        minimum wall
                                    173.302a(b)(2)   thickness table,
                                    , manufactured   and update the
                                    in (3), (4)      rejection criteria
                                    and (5), and     table to include
                                    180.213.         outside diameters
                                                     of 18 to
                                                     22 for
                                                     DOT 3AAX cylinders.
15448-M.........  U.S. Department  49 CFR 172.320,  To modify the
                   of Defense       173.51,          special permit to
                   Scott AFB, IL.   173.56, 173.57   authorize Class 2,
                                    and 173.58.      3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,
                                                     and 9 materials
                                                     under interim
                                                     hazard class.
15735-M.........  W.R. Grace &     49 CFR           To modify the
                   Co.-Conn.        173.242(d).      special permit to
                   Columbia, MD.                     authorize Divison
                                                     4.2 materials.

13997-M.........  Maritime         49 CFR           To modify the
                   Helicopters,     172.101(9b),     special permit to
                   Inc. Homer, AK.  172.204(c)(3),   authorize an
                                    173.27(6)(2),    increase in
                                    175.30(a)(1),    portable tank
                                    172.200,         capacity and the
                                    172.300,         addition of Class 3
                                    172.400,         materials.
                                    175.75,
                                    172.301(c),
                                    172.302(c),
                                    and Part 178.
15335-M.........  Seastar          49 CFR           To modify the
                   Chemicals Inc.   173.158(f)(3).   special permit to
                   Sidney, BC.                       authorize
                                                     alternative
                                                     threaded closure
                                                     caps.
12362-M.........  U.S. Department  49 CFR           To modify the
                   of Defense       176.164(c).      special permit to
                   Scott AFB, IL.                    authorize all
                                                     Government owned
                                                     Maritime
                                                     Prepostioning Ships
                                                     to use alternative
                                                     stowage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                       NEW SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15863-N.........  Baker Hughes     49 CFR           To authorize the
                   Oilfield         173.301(a),      transportation in
                   Operations       173.301(f) and   commerce of
                   Inc. Houston,    173.302a.        compressed nitrogen
                   TX.                               in a non-DOT
                                                     specification
                                                     cylinder that is
                                                     not equipped with a
                                                     pressure relief
                                                     device. (modes 1,
                                                     2, 3, 4).
15882-N.........  Ryan Air Inc.    49 CFR 172.101   To authorize the
                   Anchorage, AK.   Table Column     transportation in
                                    (9B), 173.27     commerce of certain
                                    and 173.243.     Class 3 fuels in
                                                     non-DOT
                                                     specification bulk
                                                     packaging by cargo
                                                     aircraft. (mode 4).
16015-N.........  GPI Corporation  49 CFR 173.240,  To authorize the
                   Schofield, WI.   173.241,         manufacture,
                                    173.242 and      marking, sale and
                                    173.243.         use of non-DOT
                                                     specification cargo
                                                     tanks similar to
                                                     DOT 407 and 412
                                                     cargo tanks. (mode
                                                     1).
16024-N.........  Manulwa          49 CFR 175.9(a)  To authorize the
                   Airways, Inc.                     transportation in
                   Hilo, HI.                         commerce of certain
                                                     hazardous materials
                                                     by external load.
                                                     (mode 4).
16017-N.........  Transportation   49 CFR Part      To authorize the
                   Security         107, Subpart     shipment of
                   Administration   B, Appendix B;   radiation detection
                   Arlington, VA.   Part 172,        survey meters
                                    Subpart C;       containing a
                                    173.25, 175.85.  Division 2.2
                                                     compressed gas in
                                                     the passenger
                                                     compartment of
                                                     commercial
                                                     aircraft. (mode 5).
16037-N.........  E.I. duPont de   49 CFR 173.242.  To authorize the
                   Nemours and                       transportation in
                   Company                           commerce of a Class
                   Wilmington, DE.                   8 corrosive) solid
                                                     in UN50G large
                                                     packagings. (modes
                                                     1, 2, 3).
16087-N.........  Textron Defense  49 CFR 172.101   To authorize the
                   Systems (TDS)    Column (9B).     offering for
                   Wilmington, MA.                   transportation in
                                                     commerce of certain
                                                     Class 1 explosive
                                                     materials which are
                                                     forbidden for
                                                     transportation by
                                                     cargo only
                                                     aircraft. (mode 4).
16106-N.........  New England      49 CFR           To authorize the one-
                   Primate          173.199(a)(1).   time one-way
                   Research                          transportation in
                   Center                            commerce of lice,
                   Southborough,                     non-human primates
                   MA.                               (NHPs) infected
                                                     with Division 6.2
                                                     (infectious
                                                     substance)
                                                     materials. (mode
                                                     1).
16092-N.........  Swift River      49 CFR 49 CFR    To authorize the
                   Air, LLC         172.101 Column   transportation in
                   Anchorage, AK.   (8C), 173.241,   commerce of certain
                                    173.242,         flammable and
                                    175.310.         combustible liquids
                                                     in alternative
                                                     packaging having a
                                                     capacity of 119
                                                     gallons or more by
                                                     air. (mode 4).
16107-N.........  DAHER-TLI......  49 CFR           To authorize the one
                                    173.420(a)(2)(   time one way
                                    i); 173.420(6).  transportation in
                                                     commerce of 14
                                                     heeled cylinders
                                                     that are not ANSI
                                                     N14.1 compliant.
                                                     (mode 1).
16105-N.........  Coastal          49 CFR 49 CFR    To authorize the
                   Helicopters      Table sect;      transportation in
                   Incorporated     172.101,         commerce of certain
                   Inc. Belfast,    Column (9B),     hazardous materials
                   ME.              Sec.             by 14 CFR Part 133
                                    172.204(c)(3),   Rotorcraft External
                                    Sec.             Load Operations
                                    173.27(b)(2)     transporting
                                    Sec.             hazardous materials
                                    175.30(a)(1)     attached to or
                                    Sec.             suspended from an
                                    172.200,         aircraft, in remote
                                    172.300, and     areas of the U.S.
                                    172.400.         only, without being
                                                     subject to hazard
                                                     communication
                                                     requirements,
                                                     quantity
                                                     limitations and
                                                     certain loading and
                                                     stowage
                                                     requirements. (mode
                                                     4).
16150-N.........  Egli Air Haul    49 CFR 172.101   Authorizes the
                   Inc. King        Column (9B);     transport of
                   Salmon, AK.      175.30(a)(1).    propane in DOT
                                                     Specification
                                                     4B240, 48A240,
                                                     4BW240 cylinders
                                                     via helicopter
                                                     utilizing sling
                                                     loads. (mode 4).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                    EMERGENCY SPECIAL PERMIT GRANTED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
16055-N.........  Gateway          49 CFR 172.300,  To authorize the one-
                   Pyrotechnic      172.400,         time, one-way
                   Productions,     172.301(c),      transportation of
                   LLC, dba         173.56.          unappproved
                   Gateway                           fireworks from
                   Fireworks                         Dallas, TX to
                   Displays St.                      storage in
                   Louis, MO.                        Illiopolis, IL.
16159-N.........  The Boeing       49 CFR 172.300,  To authorize the
                   Company          172.400 and      transportation in
                   Renton, WA.      172.500.         commerce of a
                                                     Division 1.4S
                                                     material without
                                                     marking, labeling
                                                     or placarding.
                                                     (modes 1, 2, 3, 4).
16153-N.........  Trailers y       49 CFR 178.345-  To authorize the
                   Tanques de       7(d).            transportation in
                   Aluminio S.A.                     commerce of certain
                   de CV. Mexico.                    cargo tanks with
                                                     ring stiffers
                                                     manufactured
                                                     between October
                                                     2011 through May
                                                     2013 that are not
                                                     in compliance with
                                                     178.347-7(d).
                                                     (modes 1, 2, 3).
16151-N.........  Antonov          49 CFR 49 CFR    To authorize the one-
                   Company, t/a     Section          time transportation
                   Antonov          172.101 Column   in commerce of
                   Airlines Kiev,   (9B).            certain explosives
                   NH.                               that are forbidden
                                                     for transportation
                                                     by cargo only
                                                     aircraft. (mode 3).

16164-N.........  AREVA, Inc.      49 CFR           To authorize the one
                   Richland, WA.    173.420(a)(2)(   time one way
                                    i); 173.420(b).  transportation in
                                                     commerce of four
                                                     Model 30B cylinders
                                                     that contain a
                                                     small residual heel
                                                     of uranium
                                                     hexafluoride. (mode
                                                     1).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 DENIED
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15788-M.........    Request by Amtrol-Alfa, Metalomecanica SA Portugal,
                   May 28, 2014. To modify the special permit to address
                    requests made in the original application submitted
                                   on December 26, 2012.
14808-M.........   Request by Amtro Alfa Metalomecanica SA Portugal, May
                    23, 2014. To modify the special permit to authorize
                      an increase in the maximum water capacity to 10
                                          gallons.
15036-M.........        Request by UTLX Manufacturing, Incorporated
                    Alexandria, LA, May 21, 2014. To modify the special
                     permit to authorize an increase of the inspection
                                  interval to five years.
15997-N.........   Request by Chemring Energetic Devices, Inc. Torrance,
                    CA, May 7, 2014. To authorize the transportation in
                    commerce Sealed Scrap Parts (small parts containing
                     milligram explosive loads) as as UN0352, Articles,
                       explosive, n.o.s. 1.4D without having them re-
                          examined when transported for disposal.
16095-N.........   Request by Clay & Bailey Manufacturing Company Kansas
                   City, MO, May 28, 2014. To authorize the manufacture,
                    mark, sale and use of manways constructed from Ultra
                    High Molecular Weight Pole Ethylene for use on cargo
                   tank motor vehicles in transporting certain hazardous
                                         materials.
16136-N.........  Request by Elk Environmental Services Reading, PA, May
                   21, 2014. To authorize the transportation in commerce
                    of certain labpack quantities of hazardous materials
                      with shrink-wrap as an overpack without required
                                    markings and labels.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2014-14129 Filed 6-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909-60-M