[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 228 (Wednesday, November 26, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 70524]
[FR Doc No: 2014-28024]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL15-15-000]

PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Initiation of Proceeding
and Refund Effective Date

    On November 20, 2014, the Commission issued an Order to Show Cause
in Docket No. EL15-15-000, initiating a proceeding pursuant to section
206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 824e (2012), directing
PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. to either revise its Open Access
Transmission Tariff to provide that a generation or non-generation
resource owner will no longer receive reactive power capability
payments after it has deactivated its unit and to clarify the treatment
of reactive power capability payments for units transferred out of a
fleet; or show cause why it should not be required to do so. PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C., 149 FERC ] 61,132 (2014).
    The refund effective date in Docket No. EL15-15-000, established
pursuant to section 206(b) of the FPA, will be the date of publication
of this notice in the Federal Register.

    Dated: November 20, 2014.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-28024 Filed 11-25-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 72251-72253]
[FR Doc No: 2021-27617]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2021-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2185]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth,

Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or
regulatory floodway on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where
applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for
the communities listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice
is to seek general information and comment regarding the preliminary
FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The
FIRM and FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures
that the community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of
having in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for
participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before March 21, 2022.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the
respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables below.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-2185, to
Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email) [email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected]; or visit the FEMA Mapping and Insurance
eXchange (FMIX) online at https://www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities. These flood
hazard determinations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at https://www.floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_overview.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location
https://hazards.fema.gov/femaportal/prelimdownload and the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the tables. For communities
with multiple ongoing Preliminary studies, the studies can be
identified by the unique project number and Preliminary FIRM date
listed in the tables. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at https://msc.fema.gov for comparison.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Boone County, Kentucky and Incorporated Areas
 Project: 18-04-0021S Preliminary Date: March 10, 2020 and May 28, 2021
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Florence.......................  Boone County Administration
                                          Building, 2950 Washington
                                          Street, Room 312, Burlington,
                                          KY 41005.
City of Union..........................  Boone County Administration
                                          Building, 2950 Washington
                                          Street, Room 312, Burlington,
                                          KY 41005.
City of Walton.........................  Boone County Administration
                                          Building, 2950 Washington
                                          Street, Room 312, Burlington,
                                          KY 41005.
Unincorporated Areas of Boone County...  Boone County Administration
                                          Building, 2950 Washington
                                          Street, Room 312, Burlington,
                                          KY 41005.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Carroll County, Kentucky and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 18-04-0021S Preliminary Date: March 10, 2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Carrollton.....................  Carroll County Emergency
                                          Operation Center, 829 Polk
                                          Street, Carrollton, KY 41008.
City of Ghent..........................  Carroll County Emergency
                                          Operation Center, 829 Polk
                                          Street, Carrollton, KY 41008.
Unincorporated Areas of Carroll County.  Carroll County Emergency
                                          Operation Center, 829 Polk
                                          Street, Carrollton, KY 41008.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Gallatin County, Kentucky and Incorporated Areas
          Project: 18-04-0021S Preliminary Date: March 10, 2020
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Glencoe........................  Town Council, 112 North Main
                                          Street, Glencoe, KY 41046.
City of Warsaw.........................  City Hall, 303 East Main
                                          Street, Warsaw, KY 41095.
Unincorporated Areas of Gallatin County  Office of Gallatin County
                                          Executive Judge, 200
                                          Washington Street, Warsaw, KY
                                          41095.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-27617 Filed 12-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 132 (Wednesday, July 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 32222]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14573]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension: Rule 236
    SEC File No. 270-118, OMB Control No. 3235-0095

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Securities Act Rule 236 (17 CFR 230.236) provides an exemption from
registration under the Securities Act for the offering of shares of
stock or similar securities to provide funds to be distributed to
security holders in lieu of fractional shares, scrip certificates or
order forms, in connection with a stock dividend, stock split, reverse
stock split, conversion, merger or similar transaction. Issuers wishing
to rely upon the exemption are required to furnish specified
information to the Commission at least 10 days prior to the offering.
The information is needed to provide notice that the issuer is relying
on the exemption. Approximately 10 respondents file the information
required by Rule 236 at an estimated 1.5 hours per response for a total
annual reporting burden of 15 hours (1.5 hours per response x 10
responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comment to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: July 7, 2017.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-14573 Filed 7-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


SUPPORTING STATEMENT

	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 NESHAP for the Wood Building Products Surface
Coating Industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ) (Renewal)

 Identification of the Information Collection

1(a)  Title of the Information Collection

  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 NESHAP for the Wood Building Products Surface
Coating Industry (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart QQQQ) (Renewal), EPA ICR
Number 2034.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0510

1(b)  Short Characterization/Abstract

The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP),
for the Wood Building Products Surface Coating Industry published at 40
CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ were proposed on June 21, 2002, and
promulgated on May 28, 2003.  These regulations apply to existing
facilities and new facilities that perform surface coating of wood
building products where the total Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs)
emitted are greater than or equal to 10 tons per year of any one HAP, or
where the total HAPs emitted are greater than or equal to 25 tons per
year of any combination of HAPs,   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 that use at least
4,170 liters (1,100 gallons) of coatings annually.  New facilities
include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after the
date of the proposal.  This information is being collected to ensure
compliance with 40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ.

	In general, all NESHAP standards require initial notifications,
performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the
affected facilities.  They are also required to maintain records of the
occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the
operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the
monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and
records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all
affected facilities subject to NESHAP.

Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part shall
maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least
five years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports,
and records.  All reports are sent to the delegated state or local
authority.  In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the
reports are sent directly to the United States Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) regional office.

Based on our consultations with industry representatives, there is an
average of one affected facility at each plant site and each plant site
has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator of the plant site).

Approximately 232 sources are currently subject to the standard, and it
is estimated that no additional sources per year will become subject to
the regulation in the next three years.

	OMB approved the currently active ICR without any “Terms of
Clearance.”

2(a)  Need/Authority for the Collection

The EPA is charged under section 112 of the Clean Air Act, as amended,
to establish standards of performance for each category or subcategory
of major sources and area sources of hazardous air pollutants.  These
standards are applicable to new or existing sources of hazardous air
pollutants and shall require the maximum degree of emission reduction.
In addition, section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require
any owner or operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:

(A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; (C)
install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit
procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with
such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during
such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe);
(E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables
or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is
impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with
Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the
Administrator may reasonably require.

In the Administrator's judgment, hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions
from large household and commercial appliance surface coating facilities
cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated
to endanger public health or welfare.  Therefore, NESHAP for this source
category were promulgated at 40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ.

2(b)  Practical Utility/Users of the Data

The recordkeeping and reporting requirements in the standard(s) ensure
compliance with the applicable regulations which were promulgated in
accordance with the Clean Air Act.  The collected information is also
used for targeting inspections and as evidence in legal proceedings.

Performance tests are required in order to determine an affected
facility’s initial capability to comply with the emission standard(s).
 Continuous emission monitors are used to ensure compliance with the
standard(s) at all times.

The notifications required in the standard(s) are used to inform the
Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the
requirements of the regulations.  The reviewing authority may then
inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are
properly installed and operated (and/or) leaks are being detected and
repaired and the standard(s) are being met.  The performance test may
also be observed.

The required semiannual reports are used to determine periods of excess
emissions, identify problems at the facility, verify
operation/maintenance procedures and for compliance determinations.

3.  Non-duplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria

The recordkeeping and reporting requested is required under 40 CFR part
63,

subpart QQQQ.

3(a)  Non-duplication

 If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is
sent to the appropriate EPA regional office.  Otherwise, the information
is sent directly to the delegated state or local Agency.  If a state or
local agency has adopted their own similar standards to implement the
Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the state or local
agency can be sent to the Administrator in lieu of the report required
by the Federal standards.  Therefore, no duplication exists.

3(b)  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)

An announcement of a public comment period for the renewal of this ICR
was published in the Federal Register (73 FR 31088) on May 30, 2008.  No
comments were received on the burden published in the Federal Register.

3(c)  Consultations

No comments were received in response to the first federal register
notice announcing the renewal of this ICR.  The Agency’s industry
experts have been consulted.  The Agency’s internal data sources and
any projections of industry growth over the next three years have been
considered.

The Agency’s primary source of information as reported by industry is
the AFS (AIRS Facility Subsystem) which is operated and maintained by
EPA's Office of Compliance.  AFS is EPA’s database for the collection,
maintenance, and retrieval of all compliance data.  Approximately 232
respondents are currently subject to the regulation, and our
consultations with Agency industry experts regarding the growth rate for
the industry indicated that no respondents will become subject to the
regulation over the next three years.

Estimates of industry size, growth rate, and burden were developed with
extensive participation and consultation with wood building products
surface coating industry representatives during recent rulemaking for 40
CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ.  EPA believes that these estimates remain
valid, and are the best information available.  The Agency currently
collects the minimum amount of information necessary to ensure
compliance with the standard.

3(d)  Effects of Less Frequent Collection

Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of
assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the required standards.
 Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful
techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are
applied and emission limitations are met.  If the information required
by these standards was collected less frequently, the likelihood of
detecting poor operation and maintenance of control equipment and
noncompliance would decrease.

3(e)  General Guidelines

None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the
regulations established by OMB at 5 CFR part 1320, section 1320.5.

 	These standards require affected facilities to maintain all records,
including reports and notifications for at least five years.  This is
consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards.  EPA
believes that the five-year records retention requirement is consistent
with the Part 70 permit program and the five-year statute of limitations
on which the permit program is based.  Also, the retention of records
for five years would allow EPA to establish the compliance history of a
source and any pattern of compliance for purposes of determining the
appropriate level of enforcement action.  Historically, EPA has found
that the most flagrant violators frequently have violations extending
beyond the five years.  EPA would be prevented from pursuing the worst
violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of records if records
were retained for less than five years.

3(f)  Confidentiality

Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of
confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency
policies set forth in Title 40, chapter 1, part 2, subpart B -
Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR
36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43
FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).

3(g)  Sensitive Questions

None of the reporting or recordkeeping requirements contain sensitive
questions.

4.  The Respondents and the Information Requested

4(a)  Respondents, SIC and NAICS Codes

The respondents of the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are that
perform surface coating of wood building products.

Standard	SIC Codes	NAICS Codes

40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ	2421	321211

	2426	321212

	2431	321213

	2435	321214

	2436	321219

	2439	321911

	2493	321918

	2499	321999

4(b)  Information Requested

(i)  Data Items

All data in this ICR that is recorded and/or reported is required by 40
CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ.

A source must make the following reports:

Notifications

Initial notification	63.4710(b), 63.5(d), 63.9(b)

Notification of compliance status	63.4710(c), 63.9(h)

Notification of construction or reconstruction	63.5

Notification of actual startup	63.9(b)

Notification of performance test	63.7(b), 63.8(e), 63.9(e)

Notification Reports

Semiannual report	63.4720(a)

Excess emissions report	63.4720(a)(4-7)

Report of performance test	63.4720(b)

Startup, shutdown, malfunction report	63.4720(c)

	A source must keep the following records:

Recordkeeping

Five year retention of records

63.4731(b), 63.10(b)

Material formulation data

63.4730(b)

Records of HAP content calculations

63.4730(c)

Copies of notifications and reports

63.4730(a)

Records of names of materials used

63.4730(d)

HAP fractions in each material used

63.4730(e)

Coating solids fraction in each material used

63.4730(f)

Density of materials used

63.4730(g)

Documentation of waste material shipped offsite

63.4730(h)

Startup, shutdown, and malfunction plan/records

63.4730(j),(k), 63.6(e)

Documentation of control device performance tests

63.4730(k), 63.10(b)

Values measured by continuous monitoring systems

63.4730(k)

Monitoring system calibrations, maintenance

63.4730(k)

Periods of monitoring system failure/shutdown

63.4730(j),(k)

Electronic Reporting

Currently, sources are using monitoring equipment that provides
parameter data in an automated way, e.g., inlet and outlet
concentrations when determining percent efficiency.  Although personnel
at the source still need to evaluate the data, this type of monitoring
equipment has significantly reduced the burden associated with
monitoring and recordkeeping.  In addition, some regulatory agencies are
setting up electronic reporting systems to allow sources to report
electronically which is reducing the reporting burden.  However,
electronic reporting systems are still not widely used by the regulatory
agencies.  It is estimated that approximately 10 percent of the
respondents use electronic reporting.

(ii)  Respondent Activities

Respondent Activities

Read instructions.

Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate compliance monitoring system
(CMS) for temperature, for gas flow, or for pressure drop for oxidizer,
carbon adsorber, condenser, concentrator, or capture system.

Perform initial performance test, Reference Method 1, 1A, 2, 2A, 2C, 2D,
2F, 2G, 3, #A, 3B, 4, 24, 25, 25A, 204, 204A, 204B, 204C, 204D, 204E,
204F, 311, or ASTM Method D1475-98, D2697-86, D6093-97 test, and repeat
performance tests if necessary.

Write the notifications and reports listed above.

Enter information required to be recorded above.

Submit the required reports developing, acquiring, installing, and
utilizing technology and systems for the purpose of collecting,
validating, and verifying information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purpose of processing and maintaining information.

Develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the
purpose of disclosing and providing information.

Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.

5.  The Information Collected -- Agency Activities, Collection
Methodology, and Information Management

5(a)  Agency Activities

EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the
acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required
information.

Agency Activities

Observe initial performance tests and repeat performance tests if
necessary.

Review notifications and reports, including performance test reports,
excess emissions reports, startup, shutdown, malfunction plan, and
quality control plan for CMS required to be submitted by industry.

Audit facility records.

Input, analyze, and maintain data in the AIRS Facility Subsystem (AFS).

5(b)  Collection Methodology and Management

Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority might inspect
the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are
properly installed and operated.  Performance test reports are used by
the Agency to discern a source(s) initial capability to comply with the
emission standard.  Data and records maintained by the respondents are
tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs.
The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check
on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.

Information contained in the reports is entered into the AFS which is
operated and maintained by EPA's Office of Compliance.  AFS is EPA’s
database for the collection, maintenance, and retrieval of compliance
data for approximately 125,000 industrial and government-owned
facilities.  EPA uses the AFS for tracking air pollution compliance and
enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices
and EPA headquarters.  EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit,
store, retrieve and analyze the data.

 The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner
or operator for

five years.

5(c)  Small Entity Flexibility

	A majority of the respondents are large entities (i.e., large
businesses).  However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small
businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the
regulation.  Due to technical considerations involving the process
operations and the types of control equipment employed, the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements are the same for both small and
large entities.  The Agency considers these requirements the minimum
needed to ensure compliance and, therefore, cannot reduce them further
for small entities.  To the extent that larger businesses can use
economies of scale to reduce their burden, the overall burden will be
reduced.  According to the Industry Profile for the Proposed Wood
Building Products NESHAP, 97 percent of the parent companies affected by
proposed action were estimated to be small entities as defined by the
Small Business Administration. The Agency assumes that 97 percent of the
232 facilities affected by this ICR, or 225 facilities, are small
entities.

5(d)  Collection Schedule

The specific frequency for each information collection activity within
this request is shown in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost,
NESHAP for the Wood Building Products Surface Coating Industry (40 CFR
Part 63, Subpart QQQQ) (Renewal).

6.  Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection

Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the
recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for
the subpart included in this ICR.  The individual burdens are expressed
under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept
of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act.  Where appropriate,
specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified.  Responses to
this information collection are mandatory.

The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB Control Number.

6(a)  Estimating Respondent Burden

The average annual burden to industry over the next three years from
these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 75,771
(Total Labor Hours from Table 1).  These hours are based on Agency
studies and background documents from the development of the regulation,
Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously
approved ICR, and any comments received.

6(b)  Estimating Respondent Costs

(i)  Estimating Labor Costs

This ICR uses the following labor rates:

Managerial	$100.99 ($48.09 + 110%)

Technical	$87.97   ($41.89 + 110%)

Clerical	$43.81   ($20.86 + 110%)

These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of
Labor Statistics, December, 2005, Table 2. Civilian Workers, by
Occupational and Industry group.  The rates are from column 1, Total
Compensation. The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the
benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.

(ii)  Estimating Capital and Operations and Maintenance Costs

This section covers the costs associated with all types of continuous
monitoring equipment [e.g., continuous emissions monitoring systems
(CEMS) and continuous parameter monitors].  The type of industry costs
associated with the information collection activity in the subject
standards are both labor costs which are addressed elsewhere in this ICR
and the costs associated with continuous monitoring.  The
capital/startup costs are one-time costs when a facility becomes subject
to the regulation.  The annual operation and maintenance costs are the
ongoing costs to maintain the monitor(s) and other costs such as
photocopying and postage.

Capital/Startup vs. Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs

(A)

Continuous Monitoring Device	(B)

Capital/Startup Cost for One Respondent	(C)

Number of New Respondents 	(D)

Total Capital/Startup Cost,

(B X C)	(E)

Annual O&M Costs for One Respondent	(F)

Number of Respondents with O&M	(G)

Total O&M,

(E X F)

CEM	$16,000	0	$0	$1,200	232	$278,400

The total Capital/Startup costs for this ICR are $0.

The total Operating and Maintenance (O&M) Costs for this ICR are
$278,400.

The total respondent costs in block 14 have been calculated as the
addition of the capital/startup costs, and the annual operation and
maintenance costs.  The average annual cost for capital/startup and
operation and maintenance costs to industry over the next three years of
the ICR is estimated to be $278,400.  The continuous monitoring costs
that are included in this section consist only of those capital/startup
and O&M costs that a source incurs as a result of the standard.  Some
continuous monitoring costs may not be included in this section.  For
instance,  if a particular industry typically utilizes a control device
that must have a continuous monitor

(e.g., temperature, pressure drop, etc.) to function properly, and the
recordation of additional measurements beyond the minimum are required
by the standard, then there is no capital/startup or O&M cost, but there
is a labor cost to record the additional readings.  Such a cost would
not appear in this section, but in the industry burden Section 6(d)
below.

6(c)  Estimating Agency Burden and Cost

The only costs to the Agency are those costs associated with analysis of
the reported information.  EPA's overall compliance and enforcement
program includes activities such as the examination of records
maintained by the respondents, periodic inspection of sources of
emissions, and the publication and distribution of collected
information.

The average annual Agency cost during the three years of the ICR is
estimated to be $353,426 (see Table 2 in Section 6(e)).

This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:

	Managerial	$57.20  (GS-13, Step 5, $35.75 x 1.6)

	Technical	$42.45  (GS-12, Step 1, $26.53 x 1.6)

	Clerical	$22.96  (GS-6, Step 3, $14.35 x 1.6)

These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) “2006
General Schedule” which excludes locality rates of pay.  Details upon
which this estimate is based appear below     in Table 2: Annual
Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for the Wood Building Products
Surface Coating Industry (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart QQQQ) (Renewal).

6(d)  Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

Based on our research for this ICR, there are approximately 232 existing
sources currently subject to the standard.  It is estimated that no
additional sources will become subject to the regulation in the next
three years.

Number of respondents is calculated using the following table which
addresses the three years covered by this ICR.

Number of Respondents

	Respondents That Submit Reports	Respondents That Do Not Submit Any
Reports

	Year	(A)

Number of New Respondents 1	(B)

Number of Existing Respondents	(C)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records but Do Not Submit
Reports	(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents	(E)

Number of Respondents

(E=A+B+C-D)

1	0	232	0	0	232

2	0	232	0	0	232

3	0	232	0	0	232

Average	0	232	0	0	232

1 New respondents include sources with constructed, reconstructed and
modified affected facilities.

To avoid double-counting respondents, column D is subtracted.  As shown
above, the average Number of Respondents over the three-year period of
this ICR is 232.

The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the
following table:

Total Annual Responses

(A)

Information Collection Activity	(B)

Number of Respondents	(C)

Number of Responses	(D)

Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit
Reports	(E)

Total Annual Responses

E=(BxC)+D

Initial notification	0	1	0	0

Notification of compliance status	0	1	0	0

Notification of construction/reconstruction	0	1	0	0

Notification of actual startup 	0	1	0	0

Notification of performance test   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 	0	1.2	0	0

Report of performance test	0	1.2	0	0

Semiannual report 	232	2	0	464

Excess emissions report	232	.5	0	116

Startup, shutdown, malfunction report	232	.5	0	116

	Total	696

The number of Total Annual Responses is 696.

Note that the total annual capital and O&M costs to the regulated entity
are $278,400.  These costs are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii),
Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.

6(e)  Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

The bottom line burden hours and cost tables for both the Agency and the
respondents appear below.  The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 109
hours per response.

The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the
respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively,
and summarized below.

(i) Respondent Tally

	The total annual labor costs are $6,417,525.  Details regarding these
estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and
Cost: NESHAP for the Wood Building Products Surface Coating Industry (40
CFR Part 63, Subpart QQQQ).  Furthermore, the annual public reporting
and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated
to average 109 hours per response.

The total annual capital and O&M costs to the regulated entity are
$278,400.  These costs are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii),
Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.

(ii) The Agency Tally

	The average annual Agency burden and cost over next three years is
estimated to be 8,538 labor hours at a cost of $353,426.  See below
Table 2: Annual Agency Burden and Cost, NESHAP for the Wood Building
Products Surface Coating Industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ)
(Renewal).

6(f)  Reasons for Change in Burden

There is a small increase in burden cost to account for a correction due
to rounding. The previous burden cost was $278,000 and has been
increased to $278,400.

6(g)  Burden Statement

The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection
of information is estimated to average 109 hours per response.  Burden
means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons
to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or
for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed to review
instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying
information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to
be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources;
complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or
otherwise disclose the information.

An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB
Control Number.  The OMB Control Numbers for EPA’s regulations are
listed at 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15.

	To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number
EPA-HQ-OECA-2008-0421. An electronic version of the public docket is
available at http://www.regulations.gov/ which may be used to obtain a
copy of the draft collection of information, submit or view public
comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to
access those documents in the public docket that are available
electronically.  When in the system, select “search,” then key in
the docket ID number identified in this document.  The documents are
also available for public viewing at the Enforcement and Compliance
Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC.  The EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The telephone number
for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center Docket is (202)
566-1752.  Also, you can send comments to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street,
NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Office for EPA. Please include
the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OECA-2008-0421 and OMB Control Number
2060-0510 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement

This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in
collecting

this information.

Table 1:  Annual Respondent Burden and Cost, NESHAP for the Wood
Building Products Surface Coating Industry (40 CFR Part 63, subpart
QQQQ) (Renewal)

Burden Item

(A) Person-hours per occurrence

(B)

Number of occurrences per year

(C) Person-hrs. per respondent per year

 (C=A*B)

(D) Respondents per year

(E) Technical person-hrs. per year (E=C*D)

(F) Management person-hrs. per year

(F=E*0.05)

(G) Clerical person-hrs. per year (G=E*0.1)

(H)

Annual costs ($)

1. Reporting requirements

	a. Read rule and instructions	4	1	4	232	928	46.4	92.8	90,388

b. Process/review information	4	4	16	232	3,712	185.6	371.2	361,551

c. Write reports

	i. Initial notification	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	0

ii. Notification of compliance status	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	0

iii. Notification of construction/reconstruction	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	0

iv. Notification of actual startup	2	1	2	0	0	0	0	0

v. Notification of performance test	2	1.2	2.4	0	0	0	0	0

vi. Report of performance test	10	1.2	12	0	0	0	0	0

vii. Semiannual report	6	2	12	232	2,784	139.2	278.4	271,163

viii. Excess emissions report	4	.5	2	232	464	23.2	46.4	45,194

ix. Startup, shutdown, malfunction report	4	.5	2	232	1,166	58.3	116.6
45,194

2. Recordkeeping requirements

	a. Read rule and instructions	4	1	4	232	928	46.4	92.8	90,388

b. Plan activities	12	1	12	232	2,784	139.2	278.4	271,163

c. Implement activities	12	1	12	232	2,784	139.2	278.4	271,163

d. Maintain record system for material used	20	1	20	232	4,640	232	464
451,938

e. Time to enter information

	i. Material usage	0.5	260	130	232	30,160	1508	3,016	2,937,599

ii. Compliance calculation	2	12	24	232	5,568	278.4	556.8	542,326

f. Time to train personnel	10	1	10	232	2,320	116	232	225,969

g. Store, file, and maintain records	2	12	24	232	5,568	278.4	556.8
542,326

h. Retrieve records/reports	1	12	12	232	2,784	139.2	278.4	271,163

Total Burden (Hrs) and Costs

	65,888	3294.4	6588.8	$6,417,525

	75,771

Table 2:  Annual Agency Burden and Cost, NESHAP for the Wood Building
Products Surface Coating Industry (40 CFR part 63, subpart QQQQ)
(Renewal)

Burden Item

(A)

Person-hours per activity

(B)

Number of activities per year

(C)

Technical person-hours per year

(C=A*B)

(D)

Management person-hours per year

(D=C*0.05)

(E)

Clerical person-hours per year

(E=C*0.1)

(F)

Annual costs ($/yr)

1. Initial performance test

24

0

0	0	0	0

2. Repeat performance test

24

0

0	0	0	0

3. Report review

  a) Initial notification

8

0

0	0	0	0

b) Notification of performance test

8

0

0	0	0	0

c) Notification of compliance status

8

0

0	0	0	0

d) Notification of construction/reconstruction

8

0

0	0	0	0

e)  Notification of actual startup

8

0

0	0	0	0

f) Notification of performance test

8

0

0	0	0	0

g) Report of performance test

8

0

0	0	0	0

h) Semiannual report

12

464	5,568	278.4	556.8	265,070

i) Excess emissions report

8

116	928	46.4	92.8	44,178

j) Startup, shutdown, malfunction report

8

116	928	46.4	92.8	44,178

Total Burden (Hrs) and Costs

	7,424	371.2	742.4	$353,426

	8,538

 Industry Profile for the Proposed Wood Building Products, NESHAP Final
Report, U.S. EPA, EPA-453/R-01-002

 PAGE

 PAGE   2

 PAGE


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 148 (Thursday, August 5, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42850-42868]
[FR Doc No: 2021-16705]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2021-N-0335]

Authorizations of Emergency Use of Certain Biological Products
During the COVID-19 Pandemic; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
issuance of two Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) (the
Authorizations) under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C
Act) for biological products for use during the COVID-19 pandemic. FDA
has issued one Authorization for a biological product as requested by
GlaxoSmithKline LLC and one Authorization for a biological product as
requested by Genentech, Inc. The Authorizations contain, among other
things, conditions on the emergency use of the authorized products. The
Authorizations follow the February 4, 2020, determination by the
Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) that there is a public
health emergency that has a significant potential to affect national
security or the health and security of U.S. citizens living abroad and
that involves a novel (new) coronavirus. The virus, now named SARS-CoV-
2, causes the illness COVID-19. On the basis of such determination, the
Secretary of HHS declared on March 27, 2020, that circumstances exist
justifying the authorization of emergency use of drugs and biological
products during the COVID-19 pandemic, pursuant to the FD&C Act,
subject to the terms of any authorization issued under that section.
The Authorizations, which include an explanation of the reasons for
issuance, are reprinted in this document.

DATES: The Authorization for GlaxoSmithKline LLC is effective as of May
26, 2021, and the Authorization for Genentech, Inc. is effective as of
June 24, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the EUAs to the
Office of Counterterrorism and Emerging Threats, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm. 4338, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-addressed adhesive label to assist
that office in processing your request or include a Fax number to which
the Authorizations may be sent. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for electronic access to the Authorizations.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Mair, Office of
Counterterrorism and Emerging Threats, Food and Drug Administration,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 1, Rm. 4340, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002,<PHONE_NUMBER> (this is not a toll free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 564 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb-3) allows FDA to
strengthen public health protections against biological, chemical,
nuclear, and radiological agents. Among other things, section 564 of
the FD&C Act allows FDA to authorize the use of an unapproved medical
product or an unapproved use of an approved medical product in certain
situations. With this EUA authority, FDA can help ensure that medical
countermeasures may be used in emergencies to diagnose, treat, or
prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions caused by
biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological agents when there are no
adequate, approved, and available alternatives (among other criteria).

II. Criteria for EUA Authorization

    Section 564(b)(1) of the FD&C Act provides that, before an EUA may
be issued, the Secretary of HHS must declare that circumstances exist
justifying the authorization based on one of the following grounds: (1)
A determination by the Secretary of Homeland Security that there is a
domestic emergency, or a significant potential for a domestic
emergency, involving a heightened risk of attack with a biological,
chemical, radiological, or nuclear agent or agents; (2) a determination
by the Secretary of Defense that there is a military emergency, or a
significant potential for a military emergency, involving a heightened
risk to U.S. military forces, including personnel operating under the
authority of title 10 or title 50, U.S. Code, of attack with (A) a
biological, chemical, radiological, or nuclear agent or agents; or (B)
an agent or agents that may cause, or are otherwise associated with, an
imminently life-threatening and specific risk to U.S. military forces;
\1\ (3) a determination by the Secretary of HHS that there is a public
health emergency, or a significant potential for a public health
emergency, that affects, or has a significant potential to affect,
national security or the health and security of U.S. citizens living
abroad, and that involves a biological, chemical, radiological, or
nuclear agent or agents, or a disease or condition that may be
attributable to such agent or agents; or (4) the identification of a
material threat by the Secretary of Homeland Security pursuant to
section 319F-2 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 247d-
6b) sufficient to affect national security or the health and security
of U.S. citizens living abroad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ In the case of a determination by the Secretary of Defense,
the Secretary of HHS shall determine within 45 calendar days of such
determination, whether to make a declaration under section 564(b)(1)
of the FD&C Act, and, if appropriate, shall promptly make such a
declaration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Once the Secretary of HHS has declared that circumstances exist
justifying an authorization under section 564 of the FD&C Act, FDA may
authorize the emergency use of a drug, device, or biological product if
the Agency concludes that the statutory criteria are satisfied. Under
section 564(h)(1) of the FD&C Act, FDA is required to publish in the
Federal Register a notice of each authorization, and each termination
or revocation of an authorization, and an explanation of the reasons
for the action. Under section 564(h)(1) of the FD&C Act, revisions to
an authorization shall be made available on the internet website of
FDA. Section 564 of the FD&C Act permits FDA to authorize the
introduction into interstate commerce of a drug, device, or biological
product intended for use in an actual or potential emergency when the
Secretary of HHS has declared that circumstances exist justifying the
authorization of emergency use. Products appropriate for emergency use
may include products and uses that are not approved, cleared, or
licensed under sections 505, 510(k), 512, or 515 of the FD&C Act (21
U.S.C. 355, 360(k), 360b, and 360e) or section 351 of the PHS Act (42
U.S.C. 262), or conditionally approved under section 571 of the FD&C
Act (21 U.S.C. 360ccc). FDA may issue an EUA only if, after
consultation with the HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and
Response, the Director of the National Institutes of Health, and the
Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (to the
extent feasible and appropriate given the applicable circumstances),
FDA \2\ concludes: (1) That an agent referred to in a declaration of
emergency or threat can cause a serious or life-threatening disease or
condition; (2) that, based on the totality of scientific evidence
available to FDA, including

data from adequate and well-controlled clinical trials, if available,
it is reasonable to believe that: (A) The product may be effective in
diagnosing, treating, or preventing (i) such disease or condition; or
(ii) a serious or life-threatening disease or condition caused by a
product authorized under section 564, approved or cleared under the
FD&C Act, or licensed under section 351 of the PHS Act, for diagnosing,
treating, or preventing such a disease or condition caused by such an
agent; and (B) the known and potential benefits of the product, when
used to diagnose, prevent, or treat such disease or condition, outweigh
the known and potential risks of the product, taking into consideration
the material threat posed by the agent or agents identified in a
declaration under section 564(b)(1)(D) of the FD&C Act, if applicable;
(3) that there is no adequate, approved, and available alternative to
the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating such disease or
condition; (4) in the case of a determination described in section
564(b)(1)(B)(ii), that the request for emergency use is made by the
Secretary of Defense; and (5) that such other criteria as may be
prescribed by regulation are satisfied.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The Secretary of HHS has delegated the authority to issue an
EUA under section 564 of the FD&C Act to the Commissioner of Food
and Drugs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No other criteria for issuance have been prescribed by regulation
under section 564(c)(4) of the FD&C Act.

III. The Authorizations

    The Authorizations follow the February 4, 2020, determination by
the Secretary of HHS that there is a public health emergency that has a
significant potential to affect national security or the health and
security of U.S. citizens living abroad and that involves a novel (new)
coronavirus. The virus, now named SARS-CoV-2, causes the illness COVID-
19. Notice of the Secretary's determination was provided in the Federal
Register on February 7, 2020 (85 FR 7316). On the basis of such
determination, the Secretary of HHS declared on March 27, 2020, that
circumstances exist justifying the authorization of emergency use of
drugs and biological products during the COVID-19 pandemic, pursuant to
section 564 of the FD&C Act, subject to the terms of any authorization
issued under that section. Notice of the Secretary's declaration was
provided in the Federal Register on April 1, 2020 (85 FR 18250). Having
concluded that the criteria for issuance of the Authorizations under
section 564(c) of the FD&C Act are met, FDA has issued two
authorizations for the emergency use of biological products during the
COVID-19 pandemic. On May 26, 2021, FDA issued an EUA to
GlaxoSmithKline LLC for sotrovimab, subject to the terms of the
Authorization. On June 24, 2021, FDA issued an EUA to Genentech, Inc.
for ACTEMRA (tocilizumab), subject to the terms of the Authorization.
The initial Authorizations, which are included below in their entirety
after section IV of this document (not including the authorized
versions of the fact sheets and other written materials), provide an
explanation of the reasons for issuance, as required by section
564(h)(1) of the FD&C Act. Any subsequent reissuances of these
Authorizations can be found on FDA's web page: https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization.

IV. Electronic Access

    An electronic version of this document and the full text of the
Authorizations and are available on the internet at https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization.
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.020

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.021

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.022

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.023

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.024

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.025

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.026

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.027

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.028

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.029

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.030

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.031

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.032

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.033

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.034

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.035

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN05AU21.036

    Dated: July 30, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-16705 Filed 8-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-C


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 82 (Thursday, April 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 25267]
[FR Doc No: 2022-09050]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9747-01-ORD]

EPA Board of Scientific Counselors; Notice of Charter Renewal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of charter renewal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the EPA Board of Scientific
Counselors (BOSC) is in the public interest and is necessary in
connection with the performance of EPA's duties. Accordingly, the BOSC
will be renewed for an additional two-year period. The purpose of the
BOSC is to provide advice and recommendations to the Administrator
regarding the Office of Research and Development's research program.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Inquiries may be directed to Tom
Tracy, U.S. EPA, (Mail Code B343-01), 109 T.W. Alexander Drive,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
[email protected].

Mary Ross,
Director, Office of Science Advisor, Policy, and Engagement.
[FR Doc. 2022-09050 Filed 4-27-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: March 31, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 62)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16759-16761]
[DOCID:fr31mr08-7]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2008-0117]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Gulf Intracoastal Waterway,
Bradenton Beach, FL, Schedule Change

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is changing the operating regulations
governing the Cortez bridge mile 87.4 and the Anna Maria bridge mile
89.2 across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway to allow for the
rehabilitation of the Anna Maria Bridge. This rule will allow each
bridge to open on a twice an hour schedule, except that they will be
closed to navigation in the evening; also each bridge will open once
every hour during the 45 day vehicle closure period on the Anna Maria
Bridge. This action is necessary for worker safety and will assist in
expediting the rehabilitation of the Anna Maria Bridge.

DATES: This temporary final rule is effective from 7 a.m. March 15,
2008 through 7 p.m. December 31, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2008-0117 and are available online
at

www.regulations.gov. They are also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and Commander
(dpb), Seventh Coast Guard District, 909 SE. 1st Avenue, Room 432,
Miami, Florida 33131-3028 between 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call Mr. Michael Lieberum, Bridge Branch, Seventh Coast Guard District,
at<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-
9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    We did not publish a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) for this
regulation. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing an NPRM. The final pre-construction and
construction schedule were not provided to the Coast Guard with
sufficient time to publish an NPRM and receive public comment before
work began. The mayors of the surrounding cities, in coordination with
the bridge owner, the contractor and local marinas in the area provided
the Coast Guard with a finalized work schedule and suggested change in
the bridges operations that would best serve the concerns of the
surrounding communities and the contractor. In addition, the
communities in the vicinity of the Anna Maria and Cortez bridges were
informed of the bridge rehabilitation and proposed restrictions through
the use of the local media. Furthermore this regulation is necessary
for workers safety and will assist in expediting the rehabilitation of
the Anna Maria Bridge. Therefore publishing an NPRM and delaying the
start date of the rehabilitation project is contrary to the public
interest and unnecessary.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for the same reasons articulated in the
preceding paragraph, the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective in less than 30 days after publication in
the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    Due to the planned extensive rehabilitation of the Anna Maria
Bridge across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway mile 89.2, Bradenton
Beach, Florida, the contractor requested that the Coast Guard change
the current operation of the Anna Maria Bridge and the Cortez Bridge.
The contractor also advised that it was necessary to start preparatory
work as soon as possible in order to complete some of the work prior to
the scheduled 45 days closure period to vehicular traffic. The Anna
Maria Bridge would be closed to vehicle traffic for 45 days starting on
September 29, 2008 and all vehicle traffic would be detoured to the
Cortez Bridge across the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway mile 87.4,
Bradenton Beach, Florida. The mayors of the surrounding cities
requested a meeting with all concerned to discuss alternative solutions
to alleviate possible vehicle traffic problems that could disrupt the
flow of vehicles transiting to and from Anna Maria Island. The meeting
sponsored by the local mayors was and held on November 28, 2007, and
allowed the Coast Guard to hear the concerns of the mayors and the
School Board which assisted in drafting this temporary rule.
    The current operating regulation for the Cortez Bridge 33 CFR
117.287(d)(1) states: Cortez (SR 684) Bridge, mile 87.4. The draw shall
open on signal, except that from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m., the draw need only
open on the hour, 20 minutes after the hour and forty minutes after the
hour. From January 15 to May 15, from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m., the draw need
only open on the hour and half-hour.
    The current operating regulation for the Anna Maria Bridge 33 CFR
117.287(d)(2) states: Anna Maria (SR 64) (Manatee Avenue West) Bridge,
mile 89.2. The draw shall open on signal, except that from 6 a.m. to 7
p.m., the draw need only open on the hour, 20 minutes after the hour
and forty minutes after the hour. From January 15 to May 15, from 6
a.m. to 7 p.m., the draw need only open on the hour and half-hour.
    Based on the information received, the Coast Guard is changing the
regulations for these bridges so that they will remain on a twice an
hour schedule throughout the length of the rehabilitation, except they
will be closed to navigation in the evening and will open once an hour
during the day during the 45 day vehicle closure period. This action is
necessary to assist the local communities' vehicle traffic flow and the
contractor in completing the scheduled work in a timely manner.

Regulatory Evaluation

    This rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under section
3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does
not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. The major impact of this rulemaking will
occur during the off season so as to have the least impact on the local
communities. Additionally, there is an alternate route available for
the majority of vessels to avoid the construction area.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This action will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as there is an alternate route
available for the majority of vessels to avoid the construction area.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small
businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who
enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and
the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman
evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency's responsiveness
to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of
the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR (1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard
will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,

Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Commandant Instruction M16475.lD
which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that there are no factors in this case that would limit
the use of a categorical exclusion under section 2.B.2 of the
Instruction. Therefore, this rule is categorically excluded, under
figure 2.1, paragraph (32)(e) of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation.
    Under figures 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' and a ``Categorical Exclusion
Determination'' are not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. From 7 a.m. on March 15, 2008, through 7 p.m. on December 31, 2008,
Sec.  117.287(d)(1) and Sec.  117.287(d)(2) are temporarily suspended
and temporary Sec.  117.287(d)(5) and temporary Sec.  117.287(d)(6) are
added to read as follows:

Sec.  117.287  Gulf Intracoastal Waterway.

    (d)(5) Cortez (SR 684) Bridge, mile 87.4. The draw shall open on
signal; except that from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m., the draw shall open on the
hour and half-hour.
    From September 29, 2008 to November 13, 2008, the Cortez Bridge
will remain closed to navigation from 5:35 a.m. to 9:25 a.m., 1:35 p.m.
to 4:25 p.m. and 8 p.m. to 4:25 a.m. At all other times, this bridge
will open once an hour on the bottom of the hour.
    (6) The Anna Maria (SR 64) (Manatee Avenue West) Bridge, mile 89.2.
The draw shall open a single-leaf on signal; except that from 6 a.m. to
7 p.m., the draw shall open on the hour and half-hour. A double-leaf
opening will be available with a one-hour notice to the bridge tender.
From September 29, 2008 to November 13, 2008, the Anna Maria Bridge
will remain closed to navigation from 6 a.m. to 9 a.m., 2 p.m. to 5
p.m. and 8 p.m. to 5 a.m., at all other times, this bridge will open
once an hour on the top of the hour.
* * * * *

    Dated: March 12, 2008.
W.D. Lee,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander Seventh Coast Guard District,
Acting.
[FR Doc. E8-6483 Filed 3-28-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60847-60848]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25196]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-D-0691]

Draft Guidance on Media Fills for Validation of Aseptic
Preparations for Positron Emission Tomography Drugs; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance entitled ``Media Fills for Validation
of Aseptic Preparations for Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Drugs.''
This draft guidance is intended to help manufacturers of PET drugs meet
the requirements for the Agency's current good manufacturing practice
regulations for PET drugs.

DATES: Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the Agency considers your comment on this
draft

guidance before it begins work on the final version of the guidance,
submit either electronic or written comments on the draft guidance by
December 29, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your request. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the draft guidance document.
    Submit electronic comments on the draft guidance to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Giaquinto, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 6155, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3416.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled
``Media Fills for Validation of Aseptic Preparations for Positron
Emission Tomography (PET) Drugs.'' Most PET drugs are designed for
parenteral administration and are produced by aseptic processing. The
goal of aseptic processing is to make a product that is free of micro-
organisms and toxic microbial byproducts, most notably bacterial
endotoxins. The media fill is the performance of an aseptic
manufacturing procedure using a sterile microbiological growth medium
in place of the drug solution to test whether the aseptic procedures
are adequate to prevent contamination during actual drug production.
This draft guidance takes the form of questions and answers written
specifically to help manufacturers comply with the Agency's current
good manufacturing practices for PET drugs (part 212 (21 CFR part 212))
regarding media fills.
    This draft guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent the Agency's current thinking on media fills
and process simulations for PET drugs. It does not create or confer any
rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the
public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies
the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments regarding this
document. It is only necessary to send one set of comments. It is no
longer necessary to send two copies of mailed comments. Identify
comments with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

III. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This draft guidance refers to previously approved collections of
information found in FDA regulations. These collections of information
are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520). The
collections of information in part 212 have been approved under OMB
control number 0910-0667.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm or http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: September 26, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-25196 Filed 9-29-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 145 (Tuesday, July 29, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 43935-43938]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17834]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Parts 100, 117, 147, and 165

[USCG-2014-0567]

Quarterly Listings; Safety Zones, Security Zones, Special Local
Regulations, Drawbridge Operation Regulations and Regulated Navigation
Areas

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of expired temporary rules issued.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document provides required notice of substantive rules
issued by the Coast Guard and that were made temporarily effective
between July 2013 and June 2014, and that expired before they could be
published in the Federal Register. This notice lists temporary safety
zones, security zones, special local regulations, drawbridge operation
regulations and regulated navigation areas, all of limited duration and
for which timely publication in the Federal Register was not possible.

DATES: This document lists temporary Coast Guard rules that became
effective between July 2013 and June 2014, and were terminated before
they could be published in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: The Docket Management Facility maintains the public docket
for this notice. Documents indicated in this notice will be available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building ground floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590 between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions on this notice contact
Yeoman Second Class Maria Fiorella Villanueva, Office of Regulations
and Administrative Law, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. For questions on
viewing, or on submitting material to the docket, contact Cheryl
Collins, Program

Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Coast Guard District Commanders and Captains
of the Port (COTP) must be immediately responsive to the safety and
security needs within their jurisdiction; therefore, District
Commanders and COTPs have been delegated the authority to issue certain
local regulations. Safety zones may be established for safety or
environmental purposes. A safety zone may be stationary and described
by fixed limits or it may be described as a zone around a vessel in
motion. Security zones limit access to prevent injury or damage to
vessels, ports, or waterfront facilities. Special local regulations are
issued to enhance the safety of participants and spectators at regattas
and other marine events. Drawbridge operation regulations authorize
changes to drawbridge schedules to accommodate bridge repairs, seasonal
vessel traffic, and local public events. Regulated Navigation Areas are
water areas within a defined boundary for which regulations for vessels
navigating within the area have been established by the regional Coast
Guard District Commander.
    Timely publication of these rules in the Federal Register is often
precluded when a rule responds to an emergency, or when an event occurs
without sufficient advance notice. The affected public is, however,
often informed of these rules through Local Notices to Mariners, press
releases, and other means. Moreover, actual notification is provided by
Coast Guard patrol vessels enforcing the restrictions imposed by the
rule. Because Federal Register publication was not possible before the
end of the effective period, mariners were personally notified of the
contents of these safety zones, security zones, special local
regulations, regulated navigation areas or drawbridge operation
regulations by Coast Guard officials on-scene prior to any enforcement
action. However, the Coast Guard, by law, must publish in the Federal
Register notice of substantive rules adopted. To meet this obligation
without imposing undue expense on the public, the Coast Guard
periodically publishes a list of these temporary safety zones, security
zones, special local regulations, regulated navigation areas and
drawbridge operation regulations. Permanent rules are not included in
this list because they are published in their entirety in the Federal
Register. Temporary rules are also published in their entirety if
sufficient time is available to do so before they are placed in effect
or terminated.
    The temporary rules listed in this notice have been exempted from
review under Executive Order 12666, Regulatory Planning and Review,
because of their emergency nature, limited scope and temporary
effectiveness.
    The following unpublished rules were placed in effect temporarily
during the period between July 2013 and June 2014 unless otherwise
indicated. To view copies of these rules, visit www.regulations.gov and
search by the docket number indicated in the list below.

    Dated: July 23, 2014.
K.G. Cervoni,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Docket No.                       Location                      Type                Effective date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USCG-2013-0640....................  Chester, PA...............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    7/20/2013
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2013-0733....................  Ocean City, NJ............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    8/24/2013
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2013-0846....................  Miami Beach, FL...........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    9/14/2013
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2013-0565....................  Miami, FL.................  Safety Zones (Parts 147    9/28/2013
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2013-0565....................  Miami, FL.................  Safety Zones (Parts 147    9/28/2013
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2013-0862....................  Seattle, WA...............  Drawbridges (Part 117)...  10/5/2013
USCG-2013-0815....................  San Diego, CA.............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    10/12/2013
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2013-0867....................  Harsens Island, MI........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    10/19/2013
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2013-0821....................  Lake Havasu, AZ...........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    10/19/2013
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2013-0945....................  Pago Harbor, American       Special Local Regulation   11/11/2013
                                     Samoa.                      (Part 100).
USCG-2013-0894....................  Savannah, GA..............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    11/13/2013
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2013-1013....................  Allegheny and Ohio Rivers.  Safety Zones (Parts 147    12/15/2013
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0019....................  Los Angeles, CA...........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    1/25/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0018....................  Vero Beach, FL............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    1/25/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0025....................  Mt. Vernon, IN............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    1/26/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0029....................  West Mifflin, PA..........  Security Zones (Part 165)  1/27/2014
USCG-2013-1086....................  Cambridge, MD.............  Security Zone (Part 165).  1/29/2014
USCG-2014-0039....................  Evansville, IN............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    1/29/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0022....................  Gloucester, VA............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    2/9/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0061....................  Coral Gables, FL..........  Security Zone (Part 165).  2/12/2014
USCG-2014-0057....................  Gulfport, MS..............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    2/12/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0043....................  Liberty Island, NY........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    2/13/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0103....................  Rockwood, IL..............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    2/15/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0084....................  Saint Louis, MO...........  Security Zone (Part 165).  2/19/2014
USCG-2013-0999....................  La Conner, WA.............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    2/21/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0078....................  San Pedro, CA.............  Security Zones (Part 165)  2/21/2014
USCG-2014-0030....................  Savannah, GA..............  Safety Zone (Parts 147     2/23/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0031....................  Tavares, FL...............  Special Local Regulation   3/1/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0136....................  San Diego, CA.............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    3/1/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0070....................  Sacramento, CA............  Drawbridge Operation       3/3/2014
                                                                 Regulation (Part 117).
USCG-2014-0164....................  Manhattan, NY.............  Security Zone (Part 165).  3/11/2014
USCG-2014-0141....................  Savannah, GA..............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    3/13/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0129....................  Manitowoc, Wisconsin......  Safety Zone (Parts 147     3/14/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2012-0087....................  Puget Sound, WA...........  Security Zone (Part 165).  3/16/2014
USCG-2014-0032....................  Tavares, FL...............  Special Local Regulation   3/21/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0137....................  Fairfax Co, VA and Charles  Safety Zone (Parts 147     3/24/2014
                                     CO, MD.                     and 165).
USCG-2014-0217....................  Ohio River................  Safety Zones (Parts 147    3/26/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2011-0489....................  Lake Michigan, Chicago      Security Zone (Part 165).  4/2/2014
                                     Harbor.
USCG-2014-0131....................  Charleston, SC............  Security Zones (Part 165)  4/5/2014

USCG-2014-0225....................  Portland, OR..............  Drawbridge Operation       4/6/2014
                                                                 Regulation (Part 117).
USCG-2012-0087....................  Tacoma, WA................  Security Zone (Part 165).  4/11/2014
USCG-2014-0266....................  Manhattan, NY.............  Security Zone (Part 165).  4/11/2014
USCG-2014-0276....................  Grand Haven, MI...........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    4/12/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0062....................  Englewood Beach, FL.......  Special Local Regulation   4/12/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2013-0963....................  Ellis Island, NY..........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    4/15/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0287....................  Blytheville, AR...........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    4/15/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0288....................  Miami, FL.................  Security Zone (Part 165).  4/17/2014
USCG-2014-0230....................  Liberty Island, NY........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    4/18/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0304....................  Virginia Beach, VA........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    4/18/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0270....................  Seattle, WA...............  Drawbridge Operation       4/19/2014
                                                                 Regulation (Part 117).
USCG-2014-0033....................  Daytona Beach, FL.........  Special Local Regulation   4/25/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0262....................  Wyandotte, MI.............  Special Local Regulation   4/26/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0315....................  Miami Beach, FL...........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    4/26/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0322....................  San Francisco, CA.........  Special Local Regulation   4/27/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0321....................  Tiburon, CA...............  Special Local Regulation   4/27/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0309....................  Wyandotte, MI.............  Special Local Regulation   5/3/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0271....................  Key West, FL..............  Special Local Regulation   5/3/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0045....................  Savannah, GA..............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/7/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2011-0258....................  Seattle, WA...............  Special Local Regulation   5/10/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0327....................  Port Huron, MI............  Special Local Regulation   5/10/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0326....................  Sacramento, CA............  Drawbridge Operation       5/13/2014
                                                                 Regulation (Part 117).
USCG-2014-0378....................  Tarrytown, NY.............  Security Zone (Part 165).  5/15/2014
USCG-2014-0355....................  Westville, NJ.............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/16/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0077....................  Elizabeth City, NC........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/17/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0294....................  Manhattan, NY.............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/17/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0340....................  Alameda, CA...............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/17/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0289....................  Baltimore, MD.............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/17/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0204....................  Cocoa Beach, FL...........  Special Local Regulation   5/18/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0396....................  Charles County, MD........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/19/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0069....................  Tampa, FL.................  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/20/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0399....................  New London, CT............  Security Zone (Part 165).  5/21/2014
USCG-2014-0390....................  San Francisco, CA.........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/21/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0404....................  Chicago, IL...............  Security Zone (Part 165).  5/22/2014
USCG-2011-0489....................  Lake Michigan, Chicago      Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/23/2014
                                     Harbor.                     and 165).
USCG-2014-0421....................  Washington, DC............  Security Zone (Part 165).  5/26/2014
USCG-2014-0311....................  Petaluma, CA..............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/26/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0255....................  New Orleans, LA...........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/26/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0241....................  Newport, KY...............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    5/31/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0373....................  Tavares, FL...............  Special Local Regulation   5/31/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0122....................  Knoxville, TN.............  Special Local Regulation   5/31/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0417....................  Oxford, MD................  Special Local Regulation   5/31/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0232....................  Mastic Beach, NY..........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/1/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0383....................  Detroit, MI...............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/1/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0420....................  Tampa, FL.................  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/2/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0012....................  Jacksonville, FL..........  Special Local Regulation   6/6/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0439....................  Portland, OR..............  Drawbridge Operation       6/7/2014
                                                                 Regulation (Part 117).
USCG-2014-0391....................  Erie, PA..................  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/7/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0477....................  Duluth, MN................  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/7/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0453....................  Anne Arundel Counties, MD.  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/10/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0426....................  Vermilion, OH.............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/13/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2013-0214....................  Port Duluth Zone..........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/14/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0239....................  Greenwich, CT.............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/14/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0335....................  Oswego, NY................  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/14/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0493....................  5th Coast Guard District..  Special Local Regulation   6/14/2014
                                                                 (Part 100).
USCG-2014-0463....................  Ocean City, NJ............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/16/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0505....................  Pacific Ocean, CA.........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/16/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0500....................  Patapsco, MD..............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/16/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0474....................  Erie, PA..................  Security Zone (Part 165).  6/21/2014
USCG-2014-0509....................  Oswego, NY................  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/21/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0428....................  Pacific Ocean, CA.........  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/22/2014
                                                                 and 165).
USCG-2014-0502....................  San Diego, CA.............  Safety Zones (Parts 147    6/28/2014
                                                                 and 165).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2014-17834 Filed 7-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P