[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 244 (Thursday, December 21, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 88286-88288]
[FR Doc No: 2023-28031]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2023-2466; Airspace Docket No. 23-ACE-6]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of VOR Federal Airway V-220 and Revocation of VOR
Federal Airways V-79 and V-380 in the Vicinity of Hastings, NE

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Very High Frequency
Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal Airway V-220 and revoke VOR Federal
Airways V-79 and V-380. The FAA is proposing this action due to the
planned decommissioning of the VOR portion of the Hastings, NE (HSI),
VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME) navigational aid (NAVAID).
The Hastings VOR is being decommissioned in support of the FAA's VOR
Minimum Operational Network (MON) program.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 5, 2024.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by FAA Docket No. FAA-2023-2466 and
Airspace Docket No. 23-ACE-6 using any of the following methods:
    * Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.
    * Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    * Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
    * Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11H, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. You may also contact the Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs,

describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority. This
rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle
VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the airspace
necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it
would modify the National Airspace System as necessary to preserve the
safe and efficient flow of air traffic.

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal. The most
helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain
the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should submit only one time if comments are filed electronically, or
commenters should send only one copy of written comments if comments
are filed in writing.
    The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments it receives on or before
the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed
after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without
incurring expense or delay. The FAA may change this proposal in light
of the comments it receives.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

Availability of Rulemaking Documents

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Operations office (see ADDRESSES section for address, phone number, and
hours of operations). An informal docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the office of the Operations Support Group,
Central Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Incorporation by Reference

    VOR Federal Airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order
JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 on an annual basis. This
document proposes to amend the current version of that order, FAA Order
JO 7400.11H, dated August 11, 2023, and effective September 15, 2023.
These updates would be published in the next update to FAA Order JO
7400.11. That order is publicly available as listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this document.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11H lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting points.

Background

    The FAA is planning to decommission the VOR portion of the
Hastings, NE, VOR/DME in September 2024. The Hastings VOR is one of the
candidate VORs identified for discontinuance by the FAA's VOR MON
program and listed in the Final policy statement notice, ``Provision of
Navigation Services for the Next Generation Air Transportation System
(NextGen) Transition to Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) (Plan for
Establishing a VOR Minimum Operational Network),'' published in the
Federal Register on July 26, 2016 (81 FR 48694), Docket No. FAA-2011-
1082.
    Although the VOR portion of the Hastings VOR/DME is planned for
decommissioning, the co-located DME portion of the NAVAID is being
retained to support current and future NextGen PBN flight procedure
requirements.
    The VOR Federal Airways affected by the planned decommissioning of
the Hastings VOR are V-79, V-220, and V-380. With the planned
decommissioning of the Hastings VOR, the remaining ground-based NAVAID
coverage in the area is insufficient to enable the continuity of the
affected airways. As such, proposed modifications to V-220 would result
in the airway segments supported by the Hastings VOR being removed and
to V-79 and V-380 would result in the airways being revoked.
    To address the proposed amendment and revocation actions to the
affected airways, instrument flight rules (IFR) traffic could use
adjacent VOR Federal Airways V-6, V-8, or V-38, or request radar
vectors from air traffic control (ATC) to fly around or through the
affected area. Additionally, pilots with Area Navigation (RNAV)
equipped aircraft could also navigate using RNAV routes T-286, T-413,
and T-468, or navigate point-to-point using the existing fixes that
would remain in place to support continued operations though the
affected area. Visual flight rules pilots who elect to navigate via the
affected VOR Federal Airways could also take advantage of the adjacent
airways or routes, or the ATC services listed previously.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to amend VOR
Federal Airway V-220 and revoke VOR Federal Airways V-79 and V-380 due
to the planned decommissioning of the VOR portion of the Hastings, NE,
VOR/DME. The proposed airway actions are described below.
    V-79: V-79 currently extends between the Hastings, NE, VOR/DME and
the Lincoln, NE, VOR/Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC). The FAA proposes
to remove the airway in its entirety.
    V-220: V-220 currently extends between the Grand Junction, CO, VOR/
DME and the Columbus, NE, VOR/DME. The FAA proposes to remove the
airway segment between the Kearney, NE, VOR and the Columbus VOR/DME.
As amended, the airway would be changed to extend between the Grand
Junction VOR/DME and the Kearney VOR.
    V-380: V-380 currently extends between the Grand Island, NE, VOR/
DME and the Mankato, KS, VORTAC. The FAA proposes to remove the airway
in its entirety.
    The NAVAID radials listed in the V-220 description in the proposed
regulatory text of this NPRM are unchanged and stated in degrees True
north.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant

preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so
minimal. Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this
proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11H, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 11,
2023, and effective September 15, 2023, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways.

* * * * *

V-79 [Removed]

* * * * *

V-220 [Amended]

    From Grand Junction, CO; INT Grand Junction 075[deg] and Rifle,
CO, 163[deg] radials; Rifle; Meeker, CO; Hayden, CO; Kremmling, CO;
INT Kremmling 081[deg] and Gill, CO, 234[deg] radials; Gill; Akron,
CO; INT Akron 094[deg] and McCook, NE, 264[deg] radials; McCook; INT
McCook 072[deg] and Kearney, NE, 237[deg] radials; to Kearney.
* * * * *

V-380 [Removed]

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 15, 2023.
Brian Konie,
Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2023-28031 Filed 12-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 192 (Friday, October 2, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 62362]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21764]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90023; File No. SR-NYSE-2020-67]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC,
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a
Proposed Rule Change to Amend Article IV, Section 4.05 of the
Thirteenth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the Exchange

September 28, 2020.
    On August 7, 2020, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend Article IV, Section 4.05 of the
Thirteenth Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of the Exchange to
allow the use of regulatory fines for charitable donations. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on August 25, 2020.\3\ The Commission has received no comment letters
on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89615 (August 19,
2020), 85 FR 52392 (August 25, 2020) (SR-NYSE-2020-67).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a propose rule change, or within
such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate if it
find such longer period to be appropriate and published its reasons for
so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the Notice for the proposed rule change
is October 9, 2020. The Commission is extending this 45-day period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that
it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ the Commission
designates November 23, 2020, as the date by which the Commission shall
either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine
whether to approve or disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No.
SR-NYSE-2020-67).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-21764 Filed 10-1-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: July 20, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 139)]
[Notices]
[Page 39866-39867]
[DOCID:fr20jy07-95]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56068; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2007-062]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Exclude Partial Trading Days From the Calculation of a Member's Average
Daily Volume

July 13, 2007.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 21, 2007, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been substantially prepared by Nasdaq. Nasdaq has filed the
proposal pursuant to section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing
with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Nasdaq proposes to exclude partial trading days from the
calculation of a member's average daily volume. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at Nasdaq, the Commission's Public
Reference Room, and http://www.nasdaq.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Nasdaq proposes to modify the manner in which a member's average
daily volume is determined by excluding from the calculation days when
the market is not open for the entire trading day. An example of such a
partial trading day is Tuesday, July 3, 2007. On that day Nasdaq will
cease trading at 1 p.m. Eastern Time (``ET'') \5\ and, thus, trading
for that day will be excluded from the calculation of a member's
average daily volume. The change will ensure that members close to
achieving the average daily volume required for a particular pricing
level will not find it more difficult to achieve that level simply
because a month contains a partial trading day.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Although Nasdaq will officially ``close'' at 1 p.m. ET,
Nasdaq will continue trading in an after hours session until 5 p.m.
ET; compared to ``full trading days'' times of 4 p.m. ET and 8 p.m.
ET, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of section 6 of the Act,\6\ in general, and with
sections 6(b)(4) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that the proposal
provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members and issuers and other persons using any
facility or system which Nasdaq operates or controls. Nasdaq believes
that the change is reasonable because it will facilitate members
achieving volume levels required for particular pricing levels in
months with partial trading days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \8\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder \9\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other
charge applicable only to a member imposed by the self-regulatory
organization. Accordingly, the proposal is effective upon Commission
receipt of the filing. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-062 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-062. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of Nasdaq. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2007-062 and should
be submitted on or August 10, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-14055 Filed 7-19-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: June 4, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 106)]
[Notices]
[Page 30894-30895]
[DOCID:fr04jn07-107]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-55809; File No. SR-ISE-2007-34]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change Relating to an
Amendment to the International Securities Exchange, LLC Constitution
and Amended and Restated LLC Agreement

 May 23, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on May 8, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``Exchange'' or ``ISE, LLC'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    ISE, LLC is proposing to amend its Constitution and Amended and
Restated LLC Agreement. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site at (http://www.iseoptions.com), at

the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange's
Constitution and Amended and Restated LLC Agreement to: (i) Remove the
requirement that the President of the Exchange also be the Chief
Executive Officer of the Exchange; and (ii) change the number of
directors from 15 to no less than 15 and no more than 16, so as to
allow for the election, at the discretion the Sole LLC Member,\3\ of a
director who was employed by the Exchange at any time during the prior
three years, but otherwise meets the definition of a ``Non-Industry
Director'' as provided under the Exchange's Constitution. Currently,
the Exchange's Constitution requires that the President of the Exchange
also be the Chief Executive Officer of the Exchange \4\ and that the
number of directors on the Board of Directors be fixed at 15.\5\ The
Exchange believes that the proposed modifications would provide the
flexibility to structure the Board of Directors in a way that is most
effective for attracting and keeping the industry's most talented
people, and in turn provide the flexibility to attract and retain the
best possible management team for the Exchange and its members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Article I, Section 1.1 of the ISE, LLC Constitution,
which defines the term ``Sole LLC Member''.
    \4\ Constitution, Section 4.1.
    \5\ Constitution, Section 3.2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The basis under the Act for this proposed rule change is the
requirement under Section 6(b)(1) \6\ that an exchange be so organized
as to have the capacity to be able to carry out the purposes of the Act
and to comply, and (subject to any rule or order of the Commission
pursuant to Section 17(d) \7\ or 19(g)(2) \8\ of the Act) to enforce
compliance by its members and persons associated with its members, with
the provisions of the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and
the rules of the exchange. The Exchange also believes this proposed
rule change furthers the objective of Section 6(b)(5) \9\ that an
exchange have rules that, among other things, are designed to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(g)(1).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(d).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(g)(2).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which ISE, LLC consents, the Commission will:
    A. By order approve such proposed rule change; or
    B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
    Electronic comments:
     Use the Commission's Internet comment form http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-ISE-2007-34 on the subject line.
    Paper comments:
     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-34. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commissions Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the ISE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-ISE-2007-34 and should be submitted on or before June
25, 2007.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-10667 Filed 6-1-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 62 (Wednesday, April 1, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 17326-17327]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07228]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Parts 161 and 164

[Docket No. USCG-2005-21869]
RIN 1625-AA99

Vessel Requirements for Notices of Arrival and Departure, and
Automatic Identification System

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Correcting amendments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard published a final rule in the Federal Register
on January 30, 2015, to expand the applicability of notice of arrival
and automatic identification system (AIS) requirements and make related
amendments regarding AIS. In that rule there is an error in the
definition of Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) User and one in the AIS
applicability regulation. This rule corrects those errors.

DATES: This rule is effective April 1, 2015.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email call or email Mr. Jorge Arroyo, Office of Navigation
Systems (CG-NAV-2), Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Ms. Cheryl Collins, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Viewing Documents Associated With This Rule

    To view the final rule published on January 30, 2015 (80 FR 5282),
or other documents in the docket for this rulemaking, go to
www.regulations.gov, type the docket number, USCG-2005-21869, in the
``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Open Docket Folder'' in
the first item listed. Use the following link to go directly to the
docket: www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=USCG-2005-21869.

Background

    On January 30, 2015, the Coast Guard published a final rule to
expand the applicability of notice of arrival and automatic
identification system (AIS) requirements and make related amendments
regarding AIS. 80 FR 5282. We have identified two errors in this
correction document.
    In the final rule, we revised the definition of ``VTS User''
(Vessel Traffic Service User) in 33 CFR 161.2. 80 FR 5334. Paragraph
(3) of that definition should only have included vessels required to
install and use a Coast Guard type-approved AIS, instead the definition
included all vessels equipped with a Coast Guard type-approved AIS
whether it is required or not. The definition published in the final
rule is inconsistent with the discussion in the preambles of both the
NPRM and final rule which encourage all vessel owners to use AIS. 73 FR
76295, 76301, December 16, 2008; and 80 FR 5311, Jan. 30, 2015. The
definition of ``VTS User'' in the final rule is also inconsistent with
our authority to impose VTS User requirements.
    Also in the final rule at paragraph (b)(1)(iii) of 33 CFR 164.46,
we omitted the word ``self-propelled'' when describing vessels
certificated to carry more than 150 passengers that are

required to have on board a properly installed, operational Coast Guard
type-approved AIS Class A device. 80 FR 5335. As indicated in the final
rule preamble (80 FR 5307, January 30, 2015) and the NPRM proposed rule
(73 FR 76317, December 16, 2008), we intended to limit the
applicability of Sec.  164.46(b)(1)(iii) to self-propelled vessels.

Need for Corrections

    As discussed above, the published definition of ``VTS User'' in 33
CFR 161.2 and AIS applicability paragraph (b)(1)(iii) in Sec.  164.46
each contain an error which is misleading and needs to be corrected.

List of Subjects

33 CFR Part 161

    Harbors, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Vessels, Waterways.

33 CFR Part 164

    Incorporation by reference, Marine safety, Navigation (water),
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waterways.
    Accordingly, 33 CFR parts 161 and 164 are corrected by making the
following correcting amendments:

PART 161--VESSEL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT

0
1. The authority citation for part 161 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 70114, 70119; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. In Sec.  161.2, add the word ``required'' before the words ``Coast
Guard'' in paragraph (3) of the definition of ``VTS User.''

PART 164-NAVIGATION SAFETY REGULATIONS

0
3. The authority citation for part 164 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1222(5), 1223, 1231; 46 U.S.C. 2103, 3703;
E.O. 12234, 45 FR 58801, 3 CFR, 1980 Comp., p. 277; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. Sec. 164.13 also issued
under 46 U.S.C. 8502. Sec. 164.46 also issued under 46 U.S.C. 70114
and Sec. 102 of Pub. L. 107-295. Sec. 164.61 also issued under 46
U.S.C. 6101.

0
4. In Sec.  164.46(b)(1)(iii), add the word ``self-propelled'' before
the word ``vessel''.

    Dated: March 25, 2015.
K. Kroutil,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2015-07228 Filed 3-31-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 33 (Thursday, February 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9345]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3622]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IN07-26-004]

Brian Hunter; Third Supplemental Notice of Designation of
Commission Staff

    On February 1, 2008, the Commission issued an order that, inter
alia, designated the staff of the Office of Enforcement as non-
decisional in deliberations by the Commission in this proceeding, with
the exception of the Director of the Office of Enforcement and the
Directors of the Divisions of Investigations, Energy Market Oversight,
Audits, and Financial Regulation. On May 6, 2008, in a Supplemental
Notice of Designation of Commission Staff, Shauna Coleman, an attorney
in the Office of Enforcement was designated as an additional exception
to the designation of the Office of Enforcement as non-decisional.
    On August 20, 2009, the Commission issued the Second Supplemental
Notice of Designation of Commission Staff designating Larry Gasteiger,
Deputy Direction of the Office of Enforcement, and Max Minzner, Senior
Counsel to the Director of the Office of Enforcement, as additional
exceptions to the designation of the Office of Enforcement as non-
decisional. Mr. Minzner is no longer employed by the Commission.
    In this notice, the Commission designates James Meade, Attorney
Advisor, as an additional exception to the designation of the Office of
Enforcement as non-decisional. Mr. Meade joined the Office of
Enforcement after the previous notices were issued and did not
participate in the investigation at issue in this proceeding.

    Dated: February 10, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3622 Filed 2-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 179 (Friday, September 14, 2012)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 56760-56761]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21286]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0848; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-20-AD;
Amendment 39-17167; AD 2012-17-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce plc Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211-Trent 800 series turbofan engines. This AD
requires removing from service certain intermediate pressure (IP)
turbine discs that have a serial number listed in this AD. This AD was
prompted by RR performing an evaluation that determined that the
current lives for certain IP turbine discs with a steel inclusion may
fail before they reach their current mandatory life limits. We are
issuing this AD to prevent failure of the IP turbine disc, which could
result in uncontained failure of the engine and damage to the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective October 1, 2012.
    We must receive comments on this AD by October 29, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC
20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Rolls-Royce
plc, Corporate Communications, P.O. Box 31, Derby, England, DE248BJ;
phone: 011-44-1332-242424; fax: 011-44-1332-245418 or email from http://www.rolls-royce.com/contact/civil_team.jsp, or download the
publication from https://www.aeromanager.com. You may review copies of
the referenced service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 781-
238-7125.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the same as the
Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Strom, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
781-238-7199; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
AD 2012-0120, dated July 4, 2012 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    The inspection of several IP turbine discs at past engine
overhauls identified the presence of steel inclusions in these
parts. Further investigation concluded that all affected parts were
manufactured from Waspalloy billets produced before 1997 at a
certain supplier who also melted steel in the same furnaces. Initial
engineering evaluation concluded that the lives of the parts would
not be affected by the presence of the said steel inclusions. This
evaluation has been recently repeated, utilising improved structural
analysis, and it is now concluded that the currently published lives
of the components cannot be supported for some discs with a steel
inclusion.
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to an uncontained
IP turbine disc failure, possibly resulting in damage to, and
reduced control of, the aeroplane.

The current life limit of the Trent 800 IP turbine disc is 11,610
standard duty cycles. Analysis shows that discs that could have steel
inclusions in them must be removed earlier than the current life to
prevent uncontained disc failure. We are issuing this AD to prevent
failure of the IP turbine disc, which could result in uncontained
failure of the engine and damage to the airplane. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the United Kingdom and is
approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to our bilateral
agreement with the European Community, EASA has notified us of the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all
information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same type
design.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public justifies
waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule because no
affected IP turbine discs are installed in engines that are used on
U.S.-registered airplanes. Therefore, we determined that notice and
opportunity for public comment before issuing this AD are unnecessary
and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective in fewer
than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0848; Directorate
Identifier 2012-NE-20-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of the
Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the individual who sent the comment
(or signed the comment on behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement
in the

Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2012-17-04 Rolls-Royce plc: Amendment 39-17167; Docket No. FAA-2012-
0848; Directorate Identifier 2012-NE-20-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective October 1,
2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Rolls-Royce plc (RR) RB211-Trent 875-17, 877-
17, 884-17, 884B-17, 892-17, 892B-17, and 895-17 turbofan engines
that have an intermediate pressure (IP) turbine disc with a serial
number listed in Table 1 to paragraph (e) of this AD, installed.

(d) Reason

    This AD was prompted by RR performing an evaluation that
determined that the current lives for certain IP turbine discs with
a steel inclusion may fail before they reach their current mandatory
life limits. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the IP
turbine disc, which could result in uncontained failure of the
engine and damage to the airplane.

(e) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following. Remove disc serial
numbers (S/Ns) listed in Table 1 to paragraph (e) of this AD within
9,700 standard duty cycles since new.

           Table 1 to Paragraph (e)--Affected IP Turbine Discs
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           IP Turbine Disc S/N
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADREB 73
ADREB 79
ADREB 80
ADREB 81
ADREB 82
ADREB 83
ADREB 84
ADREB 85
ADREB 86
ADREB 87
ADREB 88
ADREB 89
ADREB 90
ADREB 91
ADREB 92
ADREB 94
ADREB 96
ADREB 102
ADREB 103
ADREB 104
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(f) Installation Prohibition

    After the effective date of this AD, do not install any IP and
Low Pressure (LP) turbine module on any engine with an IP turbine
disc with an S/N listed in Table 1 to paragraph (e) of this AD if
the life of the disc is equal to or greater than 9,700 standard duty
cycles since new. After the effective date of this AD, do not
install any IP turbine disk listed in Table 1 to paragraph (e) of
this AD if the life of the disk is equal to or greater than 9,700
standard duty cycles since new.

(g) Definitions

    For the purposes of this AD, a shop visit is one where the IP
and LP turbine module has been removed from the engine.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, may approve AMOCs
to this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19 to make your
request.

(i) Related Information

    (1) You may find additional information on replacing the IP
turbine disc, in RB211 Trent 800 Propulsion Systems Non-Modification
Service Bulletin No. RB.211-72-AG795, dated October 28, 2011.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Alan Strom,
Aerospace Engineer, Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (3) Refer to European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2012-0120, dated July 4, 2012, for related information.
    (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Rolls-Royce plc, Corporate Communications, P.O. Box 31, Derby,
England, DE248BJ; phone: 011-44-1332-242424; fax: 011-44-1332-245418
or email from http://www.rolls-royce.com/contact/civil_team.jsp.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    None.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on August 15, 2012.
Colleen M. D'Alessandro,
Assistant Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-21286 Filed 9-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 79 (Wednesday, April 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24263-24265]
[FR Doc No: 2013-09629]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69401; File No. SR-Phlx-2013-38]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Routing Fees

April 18, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on April 8, 2013, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Section V of the Pricing Schedule
entitled ``Routing Fees.''
    While changes to the Pricing Schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated the proposed
amendment to be operative on May 1, 2013.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to amend Routing Fees in Section V of
the Pricing Schedule in order to recoup costs that the Exchange incurs
for routing and executing orders in equity options to various away
markets.
    Today, the Exchange assesses Non-Customers a flat rate of $0.95 per
contract on all Non-Customer orders routed to any away market and the
Exchange assesses Customer orders a fixed fee plus the actual
transaction fee dependent on the away market. Specifically, the
Exchange assesses Customer orders routed to NASDAQ Options Market LLC
(``NOM'') a fixed fee of $0.05 per contract in addition to the actual
transaction fee assessed by the away market. With respect to Customer
orders that are routed to NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX Options''), the
Exchange does not assess a Routing Fee and does not pass rebates paid
by the away market.\3\ The Exchange does not assess a Routing Fee when
routing orders to BX Options because that exchange pays a rebate.
Instead of netting the customer rebate paid by BX Options against the
fixed fee,\4\ the Exchange simply does not assess a fee. The Exchange
assesses Customer orders routed to all other away markets, except NOM
and BX Options, a fixed fee of $0.11 per contract in addition to the
actual transaction fee assessed by the away market, unless the away
market pays a rebate, then the Routing Fee is $0.00.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ BX Options pays a Customer Rebate to Remove Liquidity as
follows: Customers are paid $0.12 per contract in IWM, SPY and QQQ,
$0.32 per contract in All Other Penny Pilot Options and $0.70 per
contract in Non-Penny Pilot Options. See BX Options Rules at Chapter
XV, Section 2(1).
    \4\ BX Options does not assess a Customer a Fee to Remove
Liquidity in any symbols today. See Chapter V, Section 2(1) of the
BX Options Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The fixed fees are based on costs that are incurred by the Exchange
when routing to an away market in addition to the away market's
transaction fee. For example, the Exchange incurs a fee when it
utilizes Nasdaq Options Services LLC (``NOS''), a member of the
Exchange and the Exchange's exclusive order router,\5\ to route orders
in options listed and open for trading on the PHLX XL system to
destination markets. Each time NOS routes to away markets NOS incurs a
clearing-related cost \6\ and, in the case of certain exchanges, a
transaction fee is also charged in certain symbols, which fees are
passed through to the Exchange. The Exchange also incurs administrative
and technical costs associated with operating NOS, membership fees at
away markets, Options Regulatory Fees (``ORFs'') and technical costs
associated with routing options. For Customer orders, the transaction
fee assessed by the Exchange is based on the away market's actual
transaction fee or rebate for a particular market participant at the
time that the order was entered into the Exchange's trading system.
This transaction fee is calculated on an order-by-order basis for
Customer orders, since different away markets charge different amounts.
In the event that there is no transaction fee or rebate assessed by the
away market, the only fee assessed is the fixed Routing Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ In May 2009, the Exchange adopted Rule 1080(m)(iii)(A) to
establish Nasdaq Options Services LLC (``NOS''), a member of the
Exchange, as the Exchange's exclusive order router. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 59995 (May 28, 2009), 74 FR 26750 (June 3,
2009) (SR-Phlx-2009-32). NOS is utilized by the Exchange's fully
automated options trading system, PHLX XL[supreg].
    \6\ The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') assesses a
clearing fee of $0.01 per contract side. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 68025 (October 10, 2012), 77 FR 63398 (October 16, 2012)
(SR-OCC-2012-18).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to amend the Routing Fees to all other
options exchanges, except NOM and BX Options, to increase the fixed fee
of

$0.11 to $0.15 per contract.\7\ The Exchange currently does not recoup
all of its costs to route to away markets other than NOM and BX
Options. As mentioned herein, the Exchange incurs costs when routing to
away markets including away market transaction fees, ORFs, clearing
fees, Section 31 related fees, connectivity and membership fees. The
Exchange is not recouping its costs currently with the $0.11 per
contract fixed fee and proposes to increase the fixed fee to $0.15 per
contract.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The Exchange is not proposing to amend Non-Customer Routing
Fees or Routing Fees for Customer orders routed to NOM or BX
Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing
Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \8\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\9\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that amending the Customer Routing Fee to
other away markets, other than NOM and BX Options, from a fixed fee of
$0.11 to $0.15 per contract, in addition to the actual transaction fee,
is reasonable because the proposed fixed fee for Customer orders is an
approximation of the costs the Exchange will be charged for routing
orders to away markets. For example, today, NYSE MKT LLC (``Amex'')
does not assess a Customer transaction fee.\10\ Today, the Exchange
would therefore assess a Customer order that was routed to Amex an
$0.11 per contract Routing Fee. The Exchange's effective per contract
expenses to route to Amex include the ORF, OCC clearing charges,
Section 31 related fees, connectivity and membership fees are not
covered by the $0.11 per contract and are slightly higher than the
$0.15 per contract. As a general matter, the Exchange believes that the
proposed fees will allow it to recoup and cover its costs of providing
optional routing services for Customer orders because it better
approximates the costs incurred by the Exchange for routing such
orders. While, each destination market's transaction charge varies and
there is a cost incurred by the Exchange when routing orders to away
markets, including OCC clearing costs, administrative and technical
costs associated with operating NOS, membership fees at away markets,
ORFs and technical costs associated with routing options, the Exchange
believes that the proposed Routing Fees will enable it to recover the
costs it incurs to route Customer orders to away markets. Today, the
Exchange is paying a higher average cost per contract than to route
Customer orders to away markets, other than NOM and BX Options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Amex's Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed pricing for Customer
Routing Fees to all other away markets, except NOM and BX Options, is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange would
assess the same fixed fee when routing orders to an away market in
addition to the away market transaction fee. The proposal would apply
uniformly to all market participants when routing to an away market
that pays a rebate. Market participants may submit orders to the
Exchange as ineligible for routing or ``DNR'' to avoid Routing
Fees.\11\ It is important to note that when orders are routed to an
away market they are routed based on price first.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Rule 1066(h) (Certain Types of Orders Defined) and
1080(b)(i)(A) (PHLX XL and PHLX XL II).
    \12\ PHLX XL will route orders to away markets where the
Exchange's disseminated bid or offer is inferior to the national
best bid (best offer) (``NBBO'') price. See Rule 1080(m). The PHLX
XL II system will contemporaneously route an order marked as an
Intermarket Sweep Order (``ISO'') to each away market disseminating
prices better than the Exchange's price, for the lesser of: (a) The
disseminated size of such away markets, or (b) the order size and,
if order size remains after such routing, trade at the Exchange's
disseminated bid or offer up to its disseminated size. If contracts
still remain unexecuted after routing, they are posted on the book.
Once on the book, should the order subsequently be locked or crossed
by another market center, the PHLX XL II system will not route the
order to the locking or crossing market center, with some exceptions
noted in Rule 1080(m).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, the Exchange believes that it is reasonable to continue to
not assess a Customer Routing Fee when routing to all other options
exchanges, except NOM and BX Options, if the away market pays a rebate.
The Exchange will continue to assess a fixed fee, which fee is being
increased with this proposal, plus the actual transaction charge
assessed by the away market when routing to all other options
exchanges, except NOM and BX Options, unless the away market pays a
rebate. The Exchange would continue to not assess a Routing Fee if the
away market pays a rebate because the Exchange believes it is
reasonable to retain the rebate to offset the Routing Fee. The Exchange
believes that market participants will have more certainty as to the
Customer Routing Fee that will be assessed by the Exchange by simply
not assessing a Routing Fee for Customer orders routed to away markets,
other than NOM, that pay a rebate.\13\ The Exchange believes that not
assessing a fee for routing orders to BX Options, instead of netting
the customer rebate paid by BX Options against the Fixed Fee \14\ is
reasonable because although market participants routing orders to BX
Options will not receive a credit, the Routing Fee is transparent.
Market participants will not pay a Customer Routing Fee when routing
orders to BX Options with this proposal instead of the $0.05 per
contract fee netted against the rebate, as is the case today. The
Exchange believes that the proposed Customer Routing Fee to BX Options
is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the proposal would
apply uniformly to all market participants.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ BX Options pays a Customer Rebate to Remove Liquidity as
follows: Customers are paid $0.12 per contract in IWM, SPY and QQQ,
$0.32 per contract in All Other Penny Pilot Options and $0.70 per
contract in Non-Penny Pilot Options. See BX Options Rules at Chapter
XV, Section 2(1).
    \14\ BX Options does not assess a Customer a Fee to Remove
Liquidity in any symbols today. See Chapter V, Section 2(1) of the
BX Options Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that it is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to continue to assess Customer orders that are
routed to NOM a fixed fee of $0.05 per contract and orders that are
routed to other away markets, other than NOM and BX Options, a fixed
fee of $0.15 per contract because the cost, in terms of actual cash
outlays, to the Exchange to route to NOM (and BX Options) \15\ is
lower. For example, costs related to routing to NOM are materially
lower as compared to other away markets because NOS is utilized by all
three exchanges to route orders.\16\ NOS and the three NASDAQ OMX
options markets have a common data center and staff that are
responsible for the day-to-day operations of NOS. Because the three
exchanges are in a common data center, Routing Fees are reduced because
costly expenses related to, for example, telecommunication lines to
obtain connectivity are avoided when routing orders in this instance.
The costs related to connectivity to route orders to other NASDAQ OMX
exchanges are de minimis. When routing orders to non-NASDAQ OMX
exchanges, the Exchange incurs costly connectivity charges related to
telecommunication lines and other related costs. The Exchange believes
it is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to pass
along savings realized by leveraging NASDAQ OMX's infrastructure and
scale to market

participants when those orders are routed to NOM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ The Exchange does not assess the $0.05 per contract Fixed
Fee for routing orders to BX Options because that exchange pays
Customer rebates, which the Exchange would retain to offset its
cost.
    \16\ See Chapter VI, Section 11 of the NASDAQ and BX Options
Rules and Phlx Rule 1080(m)(iii)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is reasonable, equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory to assess different fees for Customers
orders as compared to non-Customer orders because the Exchange has
traditionally assessed lower fees to Customers as compared to non-
Customers. Customers will continue to receive the lowest fees or no
fees when routing orders, as is the case today. Other options exchanges
also assess lower Routing Fees for customer orders as compared to non-
customer orders.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ BATS assesses lower customer routing fees as compared to
non-customer routing fees per the away market. For example BATS
assesses ISE customer routing fees of $0.30 per contract and an ISE
non-customer routing fee of $0.57 per contract. See BATS BZX
Exchange Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposal creates intra-market competition because the Exchange
is applying the same Routing Fees and credits to all market
participants in the same manner dependent on the routing venue, with
the exception of Customers. The Exchange will continue to assess
separate Customer Routing Fees. Customers will continue to receive the
lowest fees or no fees when routing orders, as is the case today. Other
options exchanges also assess lower Routing Fees for customer orders as
compared to non-customer orders.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange's proposal would allow the Exchange to continue to
recoup its costs when routing orders to away markets when such orders
are designated as available for routing by the market participant. The
Exchange continues to pass along savings realized by leveraging NASDAQ
OMX's infrastructure and scale to market participants when those orders
are routed to NOM and is providing those savings to all market
participants. Members and member organizations may choose to mark the
order as ineligible for routing to avoid incurring these fees.\19\
Today, other options exchanges also assess fixed routing fees to recoup
costs incurred by the Exchange to route orders to away markets.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See supra note 11.
    \20\ See CBOE's Fees Schedule and ISE's Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market, comprised of
eleven exchanges, in which market participants can easily and readily
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive. Accordingly, the fees that are
assessed by the Exchange must remain competitive with fees charged by
other venues and therefore must continue to be reasonable and equitably
allocated to those members organizations that opt to direct orders to
the Exchange rather than competing venues.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\21\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
    Electronic comments:
     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2013-38 on the subject line.
    Paper comments:
     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-38. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2013-38 and should be
submitted on or before May 15, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\22\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2013-09629 Filed 4-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: March 14, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 49)]
[Notices]
[Page 11858-11860]
[DOCID:fr14mr07-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

March 8, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
    Docket Numbers: EG07-41-000.
    Applicants: Navasota Odessa Energy Partners LP.
    Description: Navasota Odessa Energy Partners LP submits this notice
of self-certification of its status as an exempt wholesale generator
pursuant to the PUHCA of 2005.
    Filed Date: 03/06/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 27, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: EG07-42-000.
    Applicants: Navasota Wharton Energy Partners LP.
    Description: Navasota Wharton Energy Partners, LP submits notice of
self-certification of its status as an exempt wholesale generator.
    Filed Date: 03/06/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0057.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 27, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER99-2342-011.
    Applicants: Tampa Electric Company.
    Description: Tampa Electric Company submits a change in status with
respect to its market-based rate authority.
    Filed Date: 03/05/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070307-0090.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Monday, March 26, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-2742-005.
    Applicants: Rock River I, L.L.C.
    Description: Rock River I, LLC submits their triennial updated
market analysis.
    Filed Date: 03/06/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0059.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 27, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-736-006.
    Applicants: CAM Energy Products, L.P.
    Description: CAM Energy Products LP submits its triennial updated
market power analysis.
    Filed Date: 03/06/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 27, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-1159-003.
    Applicants: Hershey Chocolate and Confectionary Corporation.
    Description: Chocolate and Confectionary Corporation submits its
second revised Market Based Electric Rate Tariff.
    Filed Date: 03/07/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 28, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-1165-002.
    Applicants: Energy Cooperative Association of Pennsylvania.
    Description: Energy Cooperative Association of Pennsylvania submits
an amended version of Petition for Acceptance of Updated Tariff and
Blanket Authority.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0008.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Monday, March 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER04-1181-001; ER04-1182-001; ER04-1184-001; ER04-
1186-001.
    Applicants: KGen Hinds LLC; KGen Hot Spring LLC; KGen Murray I and
II LLC; KGen Sandersville LLC.
    Description: KGen Project Companies submit their Triennial Updated
Market Analysis and Notice of Non-Material Change in Status.
    Filed Date: 03/05/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0064.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Monday, March 26, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-6-095.
    Applicants: Dayton Power and Light Company.
    Description: The Dayton Power and Light Company submits a Electric
Refund Report.
    Filed Date: 03/07/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070307-5015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 28, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-319-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits revisions to Open
Access Transmission Tariff pursuant to the Commission's order issued on
1/31/07.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070306-0202.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Friday, March 23, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-335-001.
    Applicants: E.ON U.S., LLC.
    Description: E.ON U.S. LLC on behalf of Louisville Gas and Electric
Company et al submit a revised unexecuted Service Agreement for Network
Integration Transmission Service.
    Filed Date: 03/05/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070307-0086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Monday, March 26, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-336-001.
    Applicants: San Diego Gas & Electric Company.
    Description: San Diego Gas & Electric Co submits a compliance
Filing in Response to the Commission's 2/16/07 Order.
    Filed Date: 03/05/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070305-5015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Monday, March 26, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-431-001.
    Applicants: Southern Company Services, Inc.
    Description: Southern Company Services, Inc agent for Alabama Power
Company et al submit the Rollover Network Integrated Transmission
Service Agreements.
    Filed Date: 03/05/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070307-0087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Monday, March 26, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-442-001.
    Applicants: Southern Company Services, Inc.
    Description: Alabama Power Co & Georgia Power Co et al submits a
Rollover Network Integrated Transmission Service Agreement with the
City of Hampton.
    Filed Date: 03/05/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070307-0073.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Monday, March 26, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-579-001.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits executed signature pages of the amended and restated Generator
Interconnection Agreement.
    Filed Date: 03/06/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 27, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-586-000.
    Applicants: Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
    Description: Orange and Rockland, Inc submits an amendment to its
Open Access Transmission Tariff, FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume
3.
    Filed Date: 03/01/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070307-0172.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Thursday, March 22, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-594-000.
    Applicants: Pirin Solutions, Inc.
    Description: Pirin Solutions, Inc submits a petition for acceptance
of initial tariff, waivers and blanket authority pursuant to Section
205 of the Federal Power Act.
    Filed Date: 02/27/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070306-0216.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 20, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-596-000.
    Applicants: E.ON U.S., LLC.
    Description: E.ON US, LLC on behalf of its Louisville Gas and
Electric Company et al submits proposed revisions to LG&E and KU's
joint Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Filed Date: 03/05/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070307-0085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Monday, March 26, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-597-000.
    Applicants: Montana Generation, LLC.
    Description: Montana Generation, LLC submits a notice of
succession.
    Filed Date: 03/06/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070307-0091.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 27, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-599-000.
    Applicants: Reliant Energy Electric Solutions, LLC.
    Description: Reliant Energy Electric Solutions, LLC submits FERC
Electric Tariff, Original Volume 2.
    Filed Date: 03/06/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0065.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Tuesday, March 27, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-600-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Public Service Company of New Mexico submits notices
of termination and cancellation of certain PNM Service Agreements.
    Filed Date: 03/07/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 28, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-601-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits a rate
sheet for Interconnection Facilities Agreement with the Nuevo Energy
Company and a notice of cancellation.
    Filed Date: 03/07/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0067.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 28, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-602-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection L.L.C.

    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits revisions to Schedule
2 of the PJM Open Access Transmission Tariff.
    Filed Date: 03/05/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0068.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Monday, March 26, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-603-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Inc submits a partially executed
service agreements for Market Participants selling into its real-time
energy imbalance service markets with Golden Spread Electric
Cooperative Inc.
    Filed Date: 03/05/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070308-0075.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Monday, March 26, 2007.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following foreign
utility company status filings:
    Docket Numbers: FC07-12-000.
    Applicants: Hidroelectrica EL Chocon SA.
    Description: HIDROELECTRICA EL CHOCON S.A. submits a Notice of
Self-Certification of Foreign Utility Status.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070302-5012.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Friday, March 23, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: FC07-13-000.
    Applicants: Centrales Termicas Mendoza S.A.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Foreign Utility
Company Status of Centrales Termicas Mendoza S.A.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070302-5021.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Friday, March 23, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: FC07-14-000.
    Applicants: Centrales Termicas San Nicolas, S.A.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Foreign Utility Co.
Status of Centrales Termicas San Nicolas, S.A.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070302-4012.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m Eastern Time on Friday, March 23, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: FC07-16-000.
    Applicants: CMS ENSENADA SA.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Foreign Utility
Company Status of CMS ENSENADA S.A.
    Filed Date: 03/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070302-5014.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, March 23, 2007.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-4629 Filed 3-13-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 106 (Friday, June 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36320-36321]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11744]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2023-N-2079]

Hospira, Inc., et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of Eight
Abbreviated New Drug Applications

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is
withdrawing approval of eight abbreviated new drug applications (ANDAs)
from multiple applicants. The applicants notified the Agency in writing
that the drug products were no longer marketed and requested that the
approval of the applications be withdrawn.

DATES: Approval is withdrawn as of July 3, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Martha Nguyen, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 75, Rm. 1676, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-6980, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The applicants listed in the table have
informed FDA that these drug products are no longer marketed and have
requested that FDA withdraw approval of the applications under the
process described in Sec.  314.150(c) (21 CFR 314.150(c)). The
applicants have also, by their requests, waived their opportunity for a
hearing. Withdrawal of approval of an application or abbreviated
application under Sec.  314.150(c) is without prejudice to refiling.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Application No.               Drug                  Applicant
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANDA 075160.............  Metoprolol Tartrate     Hospira, Inc., 275
                           Injectable, 1           North Field Dr.,
                           milligram (mg)/         Bldg. H1-3S, Lake
                           milliliter (mL).        Forest, IL 60045.
ANDA 077029.............  Calcipotriene           Tolmar, Inc., 701
                           Solution, 0.005%.       Centre Ave., Fort
                                                   Collins, CO 80526.
ANDA 079186.............  Dorzolamide             American Regent, Inc.,
                           Hydrochloride (HCl)     5 Ramsey Rd.,
                           Solution/Drops,         Shirley, NY 11967.
                           Equivalent to (EQ) 2%
                           base.
ANDA 200457.............  Ibuprofen Suspension,   Arise Pharmaceuticals
                           100 mg/5 mL.            LLC, 12 Roszel Rd.,
                                                   Unit B202, Princeton,
                                                   NJ 08543.
ANDA 204356.............  Ammonia N 13            Wisconsin Medical
                           Injectable, 3.75        Radiopharmacy LLC,
                           millicurie (mCi)-260    11236 West Lapham
                           mCi/mL.                 St., West Allis, WI
                                                   53214.
ANDA 205605.............  Amikacin Sulfate        Fresenius Kabi USA,
                           Injectable, EQ 50 mg    LLC, Three Corporate
                           base/mL.                Dr., Lake Zurich, IL
                                                   60047.
ANDA 205687.............  Ammonia N 13            Essential Isotopes,
                           Injectable, 3.75 mCi-   LLC, 1513 Research
                           260 mCi/mL.             Park Dr., Columbia,
                                                   MO 65211.
ANDA 210265.............  Fludeoxyglucose F18     University of Texas
                           Injectable, 20 mCi/mL-  Southwestern Medical
                           200 mCi/mL.             Center, 5323 Harry
                                                   Hines Blvd., Dallas,
                                                   TX 75390.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, approval of the applications listed in the table, and
all amendments and supplements thereto, is hereby withdrawn as of July
3, 2023. Approval of each entire application is withdrawn, including
any strengths and dosage forms inadvertently missing from the table.
Introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of
products without approved new drug applications violates section 301(a)
and (d) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 331(a)
and (d)). Drug products that are listed in the table that are in
inventory on July 3, 2023 may continue to be dispensed until the
inventories have been depleted or the drug products have reached their
expiration dates or otherwise become violative, whichever occurs first.

    Dated: May 30, 2023.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-11744 Filed 6-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19109]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08155]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2015-21]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of 14 CFR. The purpose of this notice is to
improve the public's awareness of, and participation in, this aspect of
FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this notice nor the
inclusion or omission of information in the summary is intended to
affect the legal status of the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number and must be received on or before April 29, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number, FAA-2015-
0194 using any of the following methods:
     Government-wide rulemaking Web site: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can
find and read the comments received into any of our dockets, including
the name of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment
for an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to
http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Long, ARM-200, Office of
Rulemaking, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC 20591, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>phone (202) 267-
4714.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 6, 2015.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2015-0194.
    Petitioner: United States Powered Paragliding Association.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: 14 CFR 103.1.
    Description of Relief Sought: The petitioner seeks to permit wheels
to support the foot launchable powered paraglider tandem training units
during launch and landing. In addition, the petitioner seeks to require
an auto-inflating device that will work upon submersion in water. Part
103 does not prohibit carriage of such an auto-inflating device, and
thus no relief from part 103 for use of the device(s) is required.
[FR Doc. 2015-08155 Filed 4-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 64376]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25706]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-550-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Report on Investigation of Lost and Unaccounted for
Gas Volumes [TRA/LAUF] of Columbia Gulf Transmission, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/15/14.
    Accession Number: 20141015-5167.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-551-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Report on Investigation of Lost and Unaccounted for
Gas Volumes [RAM/LAUF] of Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/15/14.
    Accession Number: 20141015-5168.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-50-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (AlaTenn), LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: AlaTenn OFO and
Change of Address Filing to be effective 11/15/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/15/14.
    Accession Number: 20141015-5075.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/27/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-51-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate
Release--KeySpan to BUG eff 11-1-2014 to be effective 11/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 10/16/14.
    Accession Number: 20141016-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/14.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated October 16, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-25706 Filed 10-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P