[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 206 (Thursday, October 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63562-63563]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24985]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Request To Release Airport Property at Charleston
International Airport, Charleston, South Carolina

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a
request to release and authorize the sale of three parcels totaling
266.954-acres of airport property located at the Charleston
International Airport, Charleston, South Carolina, and invites public
comment on this notice. The three parcels of airport property are
planned to be sold by the Charleston County Aviation Authority for the
proposed use of aircraft manufacturing. Currently, ownership of the
property provides for protection of FAR Part 77 surfaces and compatible
land use which would continue to be protected with deed restrictions
required in the transfer of land ownership.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 25, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Documents are available for review by prior appointment at
the following location: Atlanta Airports District Office, Attn: Rob
Rau, South Carolina Planner, 1701 Columbia Ave., Suite 2-260, College
Park, Georgia 30337-2747, Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in triplicate to
the FAA at the following address: Atlanta Airports District Office,
Attn: Rob Rau, South Carolina Planner, 1701 Columbia Ave., Suite 2-260,
College Park, Georgia 30337-2747.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to Senator Paul G. Campbell, Jr., Director of
Airports, Charleston International Airport at the following address:
5500 International Boulevard, Suite 101, Charleston, South Carolina
29418-6911.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rob Rau, South Carolina Planner,
Atlanta Airports District Office, 1701 Columbia Ave., Suite 2-260,
College Park, Georgia 30337-2747,<PHONE_NUMBER>. The application may be
reviewed in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the Wendell H. Ford
Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21),
Public Law 106-181 (Apr. 5, 2000; 114 Stat. 61), this notice must be
published in the Federal Register 30 days before the Secretary may
waive any condition imposed on a federally obligated airport by grant
agreements. The FAA invites public comment on the request to release
property at the Charleston International Airport under the provisions
of AIR 21.
    The FAA is reviewing a request by the Charleston County Aviation
Authority to release 266.954 acres of airport property at the
Charleston International Airport. The Charleston County Aviation
Authority plans to sell the subject property for the purpose of
aircraft manufacturing and related support functions.
    All three Parcels of land were originally acquired from Georgia
Pacific under ADAP Grant 6-45-0012-01 in September, 1976 for future
airport development.
    1. Parcel A is 141.1 acres, the largest of the three parcels. It is
located northwest of the intersection of International Boulevard and
Michaux Parkway. The Airport Surveillance Radar (ASR-9) is located on
this parcel. The Charleston County Aviation Authority granted an
easement to the FAA for this facility that runs with the land into
perpetuity or until abandoned by the FAA.
    2. Parcel B is 103.0 acres located south of International
Boulevard, east of Michaux Parkway and west of Interstate 526 (Mark
Clark Expressway).
    3. Parcel C is 22.8 acres fronting International Boulevard and
encompasses three office buildings and other various site improvements.
This property is commonly referred to as the South Carolina Research
Authority (SCRA) Tract or Trident area.
    Fair market value will be obtained from the sale of the subject
airport property. The use of the revenue generated from the sale of the
property will be in accordance with FAA's Policy and Procedures
Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue, published in the Federal
Register on February 16, 1999 (64 FR 7696). The Aviation Authority's
airport account will be properly compensated, thereby serving the
interests of civil aviation. In addition, the proposed use of this
property is compatible with airport operations.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office
listed above

under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, any person may,
upon request, inspect the request, notice and other documents germane
to the request in person at the Charleston International Airport.

    Issued in Atlanta, Georgia on October 10, 2013.
Larry F. Clark,
Assistant Manager, Atlanta Airports District Office Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2013-24985 Filed 10-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 16, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 221)]
[Notices]
[Page 66776-66777]
[DOCID:fr16no06-69]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD06-13-000]

Hydroelectric Infrastructure Technical Conference; Supplemental
Notice of Technical Conference With Agenda

November 8, 2006.
    On September 7, 2006, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
issued a notice of a Commissioner-led technical conference on December
6, 2006, from 1 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time. The conference
will be held in the Commission Meeting Room on the second floor of the
offices of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street,
NE., Washington, DC. All interested persons may attend; there is no fee
or registration. This supplemental notice provides more detailed
information and establishes an agenda, which is attached.
    The purpose of the conference is to discuss the status of new
technologies in hydroelectric generation from ocean waves, tides, and
currents and from free-flowing rivers, and to explore the
environmental, financial, and regulatory issues pertaining to the
development of these new technologies.
    Transcripts of the conference will be immediately available from
Ace Reporting Company<PHONE_NUMBER> or 1-800-336-6646) for a fee. They
will be available to the public on the Commission's eLibrary system
seven calendar days after FERC receives the transcript. A free webcast
of this event will be available through http://www.ferc.gov. Anyone

with Internet access who desires to view this event can do so by
navigating to http://www.ferc.gov's Calendar of Events and locating

this event in the Calendar. The event will contain a link to its
webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical support for the free
webcasts. It also offers access to this event via television in the DC
area and via phone bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit
http://www.CapitolConnection.gmu.edu or contact Danelle Perkowski or

David Reininger at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations please
send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free<PHONE_NUMBER>
(voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER> with the
required accommodations.
    Anyone interested in participating in the workshop via video
teleconference from one of the Commission's regional offices should
call or e-mail the following staff, by November 22, 2006, to make
arrangements. Seating capacity is limited.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Telephone
         Regional office             Staff contact          number                    E-mail address
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlanta.........................  Charles Wagner.....<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Chicago.........................  Michael Davis......<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>New York........................  Peter Valeri.......<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Portland........................  Pat Regan..........<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>San Francisco...................  John Wiegel........<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The agenda for the workshop and other related materials will be
made available on the Commission's calendar located at http://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx.
 For more information about

the conference, please contact Tim Welch at<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Kristen Murphy at<PHONE_NUMBER>
kristen.murphy@ferc.gov).

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

HYDROELECTRIC INFRASTRUCTURE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE

Hydroelectric Generation from Ocean Waves, Tides, and Currents And from
Free-Flowing Rivers
    December 6, 2006.

1 p.m. Opening Remarks and Introductions

Chairman Joseph T. Kelliher, Commissioner Suedeen G. Kelly,
Commissioner Marc Spitzer, Commissioner Philip D. Moeller, Commissioner
Jon Wellinghoff

1:15 p.m. Agenda Overview

John Katz, Facilitator, Office of the General Counsel

1:20 p.m. Energy from Waves, Tides, Ocean Currents, and Free-Flowing
Rivers: An Overview of Resource, Technology, and Business Issues

     George Hagerman, Senior Research Associate, Virginia Tech
Advanced Research Institute

1:40 p.m. Panel: Environmental Issues

What are the known and potential effects of these new technologies on
the environment and other resources?

     Jim Gibson, Senior Regulatory Specialist, Devine Tarbell
and Associates
     Dr. Glenn Cada, Research Staff Member, Oak Ridge National
Laboratory
     Dr. Mary Boatman, Alternative Energy Programmatic EIS
Coordinator, Minerals Management Service
     John Novak (invited), Executive Director of Generation and
Environment Sectors, Electric Power Research Institute

2:30 p.m. Panel: Financial Issues

What are the costs of these new technologies?

     Wayne F. Krouse, Chairman and CEO, Hydro Green Energy
     Alla Weinstein, President and CEO, AquaEnergy Group Ltd.
     Andrew Dzykewicz, Chief Energy Advisor to the Rhode Island
Governor
     Dr. George Taylor, CEO, Ocean Power Technologies, Inc.

3:10 p.m. Panel: Regulatory Issues

Do the FERC permitting and licensing processes work for these new
technologies?

     Gil Sperling, Corporate Counsel, Verdant Power, Inc.
     Thomas Bigford, Chief of Habitat Protection Division,
Office of Habitat Conservation, National Marine Fisheries Service
     Sarah Bittleman, Director, Washington DC Office of the
Governor of Oregon
     Richard Roos-Collins, Director of Legal Services, Natural
Heritage Foundation
     Des McGinnes, Business Development Manager, Ocean Power
Delivery, Ltd.

4:20 p.m. Open Forum

4:50 p.m. Closing Remarks

5 p.m. Adjourn

[FR Doc. E6-19335 Filed 11-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYWASHINGTON, D.C. 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFTEYAND POLLUTION PREVENTION

RE:  Meeting with Electronics Industry Associations and EPA to discuss upcoming TSCA Fees proposed rule
List of Documents
Meeting Summary
Attendees
Meeting Summary
On October 22, 2020, EPA held a conference call with staff of electronics industry associations.  The purpose of the meeting was to listen to industry comments on the TSCA fee requirements and ask clarifying questions.  Representatives from IPC, ITI, and Consumer Technology Association provided insight into their members' experiences with the process of paying fees and ways EPA could improve the process.
Attendees
Electronics Industry Associations
Kelly Scanlon, DrPH, CI
Director of Environment, Health and Safety Policy & Research, IPC
Chris Cleet, QEP
Vice President of Policy, Sustainability and Regulatory, ITI
Katie Reilly
Director, Environmental and Sustainability Policy, Consumer Technology Association
EPA
Lynn Dekleva, Associate Assistant Administrator, OCSPP
Meghan Tierney, Acting Deputy Division Director, OPPT, NPCD
Julie Shannon, Branch Chief, OPPT, NPCD
Fees Rule Workgroup:
Marc Edmonds, Chair, OPPT, NPCD
Jeff Kohn, OPPT, NPCD
David Popko, OPPT, CESSD
Jeffrey Putt, OPPT, NPCD
Victoria Ellenbogen, OPPT, NPCD
Brooke Porter, OPPT, NPCD


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 91 (Thursday, May 11, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30308-30309]
[FR Doc No: 2023-10091]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-10968-01-R1]

2023 Annual Joint Meeting of the Ozone Transport Commission and
the Mid-Atlantic Northeast Visibility Union

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is
announcing the 2023 Annual Joint Meeting of the Ozone Transport
Commission (OTC) and the Mid-Atlantic Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-
VU). The meeting agenda will include topics regarding reducing ground-
level ozone precursors and matters relative to Regional Haze and
visibility improvement in Federal Class I areas in a multi-pollutant
context.

DATES: The meeting will be held on June 14, 2023, starting at 1:00 p.m.
and ending at 3:00 p.m.
    Location: Virtual meeting. Further information on the details for
the virtual public meeting will be available at http://otcair.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For documents and press inquiries contact: Ozone Transport
Commission, 89 South St., Suite 602, Boston, MA 02111;<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email: [email protected]; website: http://www.otcair.org.
    For registration: To register for the virtual meeting, please use
the online registration form available at http://otcair.org, or contact
the OTC at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 contain
Section 184 provisions for the Control of Interstate Ozone Air
Pollution. Section 184(a) establishes an Ozone Transport Region (OTR)
comprised of the States of Connecticut, Delaware, Maine,\1\ Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, Vermont, parts of Virginia and the District of Columbia. The
purpose of the OTC is to address ground-level ozone formation,
transport, and control within the OTR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The geographic scope of Maine within the OTR was
subsequently reduced to the portion of Maine encompassing 111 towns
and cities comprising the Androscoggin Valley, Down East, and
Metropolitan Portland Air Quality Control Regions, commonly referred
to as the ``Portland and Midcoast Ozone Areas.'' 87 FR 7734
(February 10, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Mid-Atlantic/Northeast Visibility Union (MANE-VU) was formed at
in 2001, in response to EPA's issuance of the Regional Haze rule. MANE-
VU's members include Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia,
Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, the Penobscot Indian Nation, the
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe along with EPA and Federal Land Managers.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Agenda: Copies of the final agenda will be available from the OTC
office<PHONE_NUMBER>; by email: [email protected] or via the OTC
website at http://www.otcair.org.

    Dated: May 8, 2023.
David Cash,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 1.
[FR Doc. 2023-10091 Filed 5-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 135 (Friday, July 13, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32604-32606]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14993]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2018-0635]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Ski Show Sylvan Beach; Fish Creek, Oneida, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a temporary safety zone
for certain waters of Fish Creek during the Ski Show Sylvan Beach. This
proposed rulemaking would prohibit persons and vessels from being in
the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or
a designated representative. We invite your comments on this proposed
rulemaking.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 2, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2018-0635 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
proposed rulemaking, call or email LCDR Michael Collet, Chief of
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo; telephone 716-
843-9322, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On April 8, 2018, Mohawk Valley Ski Club Inc. notified the Coast
Guard that it would be conducting a ski show from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00
p.m. on August 12, 2018. The show will take place on Fish Creek where
the creek meets Oneida Lake starting at position 43[deg]11'36.6'' N,
75[deg]43'53.8'' W then South to 43[deg]11'33.7'' N, 75[deg]43'51.2'' W
then East to 43[deg]11'42.4'' N, 75[deg]43'38.6'' W then North to
43[deg]11'44.5'' N, 75[deg]43'39.7'' W then returning to the point of
origin. The Captain of the Port Buffalo (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with a Ski Show Sylvan Beach would be a
safety concern for anyone within the aforementioned zone on Fish Creek.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to enhance the safety of vessels
and racers on the navigable waters within the above stated points,
before, during, and after the scheduled event. The Coast Guard proposes
this rulemaking under authority in 33 U.S.C. 1231.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The COTP proposes to establish a temporary safety zone enforced
from 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. on August 12, 2018 with breaks every 30
minutes to allow traffic to pass. The safety zone will cover all
navigable waters starting at position 43[deg]11'36.6'' N,
75[deg]43'53.8'' W then South to 43[deg]11'33.7'' N, 75[deg]43'51.2'' W
then East to 43[deg]11'42.4'' N, 75[deg]43'38.6'' W then North to
43[deg]11'44.5'' N, 75[deg]43'39.7'' W then returning to the point of
origin on Fish Creek, Oneida, NY. The duration of the zone is intended
to enhance the safety of vessels and these navigable waters before,
during, and after the scheduled 12:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. Ski Show. No
vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative. The
regulatory text we are proposing appears at the end of this document.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This NPRM has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
would not be able to safely transit around this safety zone, which
would impact a small designated area of Fish Creek. However, the Coast
Guard would issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule involves
establishing a safety zone lasting 8 hours that would prohibit entry
for certain waters of Fish Creek. Normally such actions are
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1, of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 01.
A preliminary Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) supporting
this determination is available in the docket where indicated under the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, visit http://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice.
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that website's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T09-0635 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T09-0635  Safety Zone; Ski Show Sylvan Beach; Fish Creek,
Oneida, NY.

    (a) Location. The safety zone will encompass all waters of Fish
Creek in Oneida, NY, starting at position 43[deg]11'36.6'' N,
75[deg]43'53.8'' W then South to 43[deg]11'33.7'' N, 75[deg]43'51.2'' W
then East to 43[deg]11'42.4'' N, 75[deg]43'38.6'' W then North to
43[deg]11'44.5'' N, 75[deg]43'39.7'' W then returning to the point of
origin (NAD 83).
    (b) Enforcement Period. This rule is effective from 12:00 p.m.
until 8:00 p.m. on August 12, 2018.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23, entry into, transiting, or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Buffalo
or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) This safety zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as may
be permitted by the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his designated on-
scene representative.
    (3) The ``on-scene representative'' of the Captain of the Port
Buffalo is any Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or

petty officer who has been designated by the Captain of the Port
Buffalo to act on his behalf.
    (4) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the safety
zone must contact the Captain of the Port Buffalo or his on-scene
representative to obtain permission to do so. The Captain of the Port
Buffalo or his on-scene representative may be contacted via VHF Channel
16. Vessel operators given permission to enter or operate in the safety
zone must comply with all directions given to them by the Captain of
the Port Buffalo, or his on-scene representative.

    Dated: July 5, 2018.
Joseph S. Dufresne,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. 2018-14993 Filed 7-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21098-21099]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8495]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9656-7]

Reissuance of NPDES General Permit for Concentrated Animal
Feeding Operations (CAFOs) Located in Idaho

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability of final NPDES general permit.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, EPA Region 10,
is publishing notice of availability of the final National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) general permit (IDG010000),
authorizing discharges from CAFOs in Idaho including CAFOs in Indian
Country. Unless excluded from coverage in the general permit, owners/
operators of animal feeding operations that are defined as CAFOs, or
designated as CAFOs by the permitting authority, are eligible for
coverage under the general permit.

DATES: The NPDES general permit shall become effective May 9, 2012.
Facilities must submit a new updated Notice of Intent (NOI) to
discharge within 90 days of the effective date of this permit.
Facilities that have administratively extended coverage under the
previous general permit will continue to have coverage under the
previous permit for 90 days after the effective date of this general
permit or until obtaining coverage under the new general permit for
those discharges. The CAFO's authorization is only for discharges that
occur after permit coverage is granted.

ADDRESSES: The general permit, Fact Sheet and Response to Comments may
be found on the Region 10 Web site at: http://www.epa.gov/region10/water/npdes/generalpermits.html. Copies of the general permit and
Response to Comments are available upon request. Written requests for
copies of the documents may be submitted to EPA, Region 10, 1200 Sixth
Avenue, Suite 900, OWW-130, Seattle, WA 98101. Electronic requests may
be sent to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Requests by telephone may be made to Audrey Washington at (206) 553-
0523.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicholas Peak at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Additional Background

    On May 27, 2002, the previous NPDES general permit expired and was
administratively extended. Pursuant to section 402 of the Clean Water
Act, 33 U.S.C. 1342, the EPA proposed to reissue the general permit and
solicited comments on the draft general permit in the Federal Register
on November 16, 2009. The comment period ended on January 19, 2010.
Public meetings were held in Pocatello, Jerome, and Nampa, Idaho on
December 8th, 9th and 10th, 2009, respectively. Changes have been made
from the draft permit to the final permit in response to comments
received from: Canyon County Alliance for Responsible Growth, Idaho
Concerned Area Residents for the Environment, Idaho Cattle Association,
Idaho Conservation League, Idaho Dairyman's Association, Jean Public,
Jerome County Planning and Zoning, J.R. Simplot Company, Natural
Resources Conservation Service--Boise Idaho State of Idaho--Department
of Agriculture, and Whatcom Conservation District.

State Certification

    Pursuant to Section 401 of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1341, on
February 1, 2012, the Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ)
certified that the conditions of the general permit comply with the
Idaho State Water Quality Standards, including the State's
antidegradation policy.

Endangered Species Act (ESA)

    EPA completed a Biological Evaluation for the general permit and
engaged in informal Section 7 consultation with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service
(NMFS). EPA received concurrence in October 2011 from both agencies on
EPA's determination that the permit is not likely to adversely affect
threatened or endangered species and the associated critical habitat.
The permit provides coverage only if the CAFO's discharge will not
adversely affect species that are federally listed as endangered or
threatened under ESA and will not result in the adverse modification or
destruction of habitat that is designated as critical habitat under
ESA.

Executive Order 12866

    EPA has determined that this general permit is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive

Order 12866 and is therefore not subject to Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) review.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The information collection requirements of this general permit were
previously approved by the OMB under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., and assigned OMB control numbers
2040-0086 (NPDES permit application) and 2040-0004 (discharge
monitoring reports).

The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    5 U.S.C. 601 et seq., requires that EPA prepare a regulatory
flexibility analysis for rules subject to the requirements of 5 U.S.C.
553(b) that have a significant impact on a substantial number of small
entities. However, general NPDES permits are not ``rules'' subject to
the requirements of 5 U.S.C. 553(b), and are therefore not subject to
the RFA.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Section 201 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA), Public Law
104-4, generally requires federal agencies to assess the effects of
their ``regulatory actions'' (defined to be the same as ``rules''
subject to the RFA) on tribal, state, and local governments and the
private sector. However, the general permit issued today is not a
``rule'' subject to the RFA, and is therefore not subject to the UMRA.

Appeal of Permit

    Any interested person may appeal the general permit in the Federal
Court of Appeals in accordance with section 509(b)(1) of the Clean
Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1369(b)(1). This appeal must be filed within 120
days of the permit effective date. Persons affected by the permit may
not challenge the conditions of the permit in further EPA proceedings
(see 40 CFR 124.19). Instead, they may either challenge the permit in
court or apply for an individual NPDES permit.

    Dated: March 29, 2012.
Michael A. Bussell,
Director, Office of Water and Watersheds, Region 10, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-8495 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: April 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 76)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20778-20780]
[DOCID:fr21ap10-9]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2010-0196]
RIN 1625-AA87

Security Zone; Portland Rose Festival Fleet Week, Willamette
River, Portland, OR

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a security zone encompassing
all waters of the Willamette River between the Hawthorne and Steel
Bridges in Portland, Oregon during the Portland Rose Festival Fleet
Week from June 2, 2010, through June 7, 2010. The security zone is
necessary to help ensure the security of the military and other vessels
participating in Fleet Week as well as the maritime public in general
and will do so by prohibiting any person or vessel from entering or
remaining in the security zone unless authorized by the Captain of the
Port or his designated representatives.

DATES: This rule is effective from June 2, 2010, through June 7, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2010-0196 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2010-0196 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail MST1 Jaime Sayers, Waterways Management
Division, Coast

Guard Sector Portland; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule.
    There is a need to provide a security zone for the 2010 Portland
Rose Festival Fleet Week, and there is insufficient time to publish a
notice of proposed rulemaking, respond to comments, and issue an
effective rule at least 30-days before June 2, the start of this year's
Fleet Week. Therefore, it is impracticable to publish an NPRM and it
would be contrary to public interest not to issue this temporary final
rule in time for it to be published at least 30-days before the event.

Basis and Purpose

    The annual Portland Rose Festival Fleet Week will be taking place
this year from June 2, 2010, through June 7, 2010. Fleet Week includes
visits by a variety of United States and foreign military and
government vessels. The vessels will be transiting the Columbia River
and mooring up for display on the banks of the Willamette River between
the Hawthorne and Steel Bridges. Due to the security concerns inherent
for such vessels, the security zone created by this rule is necessary
to help ensure the security of the vessels themselves as well as the
maritime public in general.
    This year, the Coast Guard is issuing a temporary final rule
instead of an annual enforcement notice. Although the same security
zone created by this rule is already codified at 33 CFR 165.1312, the
enforcement dates contained in that section are not inclusive of when
the Portland Rose Festival Fleet Week is actually taking place this
year.

Discussion of Rule

    The security zone created by this rule will encompass all waters of
the Willamette River between the Hawthorne and Steel Bridges in
Portland, Oregon. This zone will be effective during the 2010 Portland
Rose Festival Fleet Week, from June 2, 2010, through June 7, 2010. All
persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering or remaining in
the security zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representatives.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. The Coast Guard has made this
determination based on the fact that the security zone will only be in
effect for the Portland Rose Festival Fleet Week and maritime traffic
may be able to enter the zone if authorized by the Captain of the Port
or his designated representatives.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which
may be small entities: The owners and operators of vessels intending to
operate in the area covered by the security zone. The security zone
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities, however, because the security zone will only be in
effect for the Portland Rose Festival Fleet Week and maritime traffic
may be able to enter the zone if authorized by the Captain of the Port
or his designated representatives.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and

Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(g), of
the Instruction. This rule involves the establishment of a security
zone.
    An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub.
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T13-136 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T13-136  Security Zone; Portland Rose Festival Fleet Week,
Willamette River, Portland, Oregon.

    (a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters of
the Willamette River, from surface to bottom, between the Hawthorne and
Steel Bridges.
    (b) Regulations. Under 33 CFR part 165, subpart D, no person or
vessel may enter or remain in the security zone created by this section
without the authorization of the Captain of the Port or his designated
representatives. Subpart D has other requirements applicable to the
security zone created by this section. Permission to enter the security
zone created by this section may be requested by contacting the Captain
of the Port at<PHONE_NUMBER> or on VHF channels 16 or 22.
    (c) Effective period. This section is effective from June 2, 2010,
through June 7, 2010.

    Dated: April 9, 2010.
F.G. Myer,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Portland.
[FR Doc. 2010-9185 Filed 4-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: December 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 244)]
[Notices]
[Page 68091]
[DOCID:fr22de09-79]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Office of Hazardous Materials Safety; Notice of Application for
Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of applications for special permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR part 107,
subpart B), notice is hereby given that the Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety has received the application described herein. Each
mode of transportation for which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying
aircraft.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 21, 2010.
    Address Comments to: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation
Washington, DC 20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the applications are
available for inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, Southeast, Washington, DC or at http://
regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with Part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 14, 2009.
Delmer F. Billings,
Director, Office of Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      Regulation(s)         Nature of special
   Application No.          Docket No.             Applicant             affected            permits thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               New Special Permits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14945-N.............  ......................  Vulcan Construction  49 CFR 172.200,      To authorize the
                                               Materials LP SE d/   173.300, 172.400,    transportation in
                                               b/a Vulcan           172.500.             commerce of certain
                                               Materials Company,                        Class 3 PG III and
                                               Atlanta, GA.                              Class 9 hazardous
                                                                                materials across a
                                                                                public road within the
                                                                                Macon Quarry without
                                                                                shipping papers,
                                                                                marking, labeling, or
                                                                                placarding. (mode 1).
14946-N.............  ......................  FAR Research, Inc.   49 CFR 173.206.....  To authorize the
                                               (dba FAR                                  transportation in
                                               Chemicals, Inc.),                         commerce of
                                               Palm Bay, FL.                             Trimethylchloro-silane,
                                                                                UN1298 in a DOT
                                                                                Specification 4BW
                                                                                cylinder for all modes
                                                                                of transportation
                                                                                except air. (modes 1,
                                                                                2, 3).
14947-N.............  ......................  Hennepin County      49 CFR 172.102(c)    To authorize the
                                               Department of        Special provision    transportation in
                                               Environmental        130.                 commerce of certain
                                               Services,                                 used batteries for
                                               Minneapolis, MN.                          recycling without
                                                                                protection against
                                                                                short circuits. (mode
                                                                                1).
14948-N.............  ......................  The Boeing Company,  49 CFR 171.8 and     To authorize the
                                               St. Louis, MO.       178.5 14(b)(2).      transportation in
                                                                                commerce of missile
                                                                                sustainer sections
                                                                                containing a flammable
                                                                                liquid in non-DOT
                                                                                specification packaging
                                                                                by motor vehicle and
                                                                                cargo vessel. (modes 1,
                                                                                3).
14949-N.............  ......................  Air Products and     49 CFR 173.301(f)    To authorize the
                                               Chemicals, Inc.,     171.23(a)(5).        transportation in and
                                               Allentown, PA.                            commerce of 40 Multiple-
                                                                                element gas containers
                                                                                (MEGCs) in DOT
                                                                                specification cylinders
                                                                                that are not equipped
                                                                                with pressure relief
                                                                                devices by motor
                                                                                vehicle. (mode 1).
14950-N.............  ......................  Certified Cylinder,  49 CFR 180.211.....  To authorize the
                                               Division of                               rebuilding or
                                               American Welding &                        modification and sale
                                               Tank, LLC,                                of certain DOT
                                               Crossville, TN.                           Specification 4B, 4BA,
                                                                                and 4BW cylinders for
                                                                                use in the
                                                                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of certain
                                                                                hazardous materials.
                                                                                (mode 1).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. E9-30305 Filed 12-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4909-60-M