[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 44 (Thursday, March 5, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12953-12956]
[FR Doc No: 2020-04471]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-88304; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2020-008]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Amend Rule 5702

February 28, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 14, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 5702 to allow the listing of
non-convertible bonds issued by certain companies not listed on Nasdaq,
NYSE American or NYSE and to remove language that is no longer
applicable.
    The text of the proposed rule change is set forth below. Proposed
new language is italicized; deleted text is in brackets.

5702. Debt Securities (Other Than Convertible Debt)

    (a) For initial listing of a non-convertible bond, the following
conditions must be satisfied:
    (1) The principal amount outstanding or market value must be at
least $5 million; and
    (2) the security must be characterized by one of the following
conditions:
    (A) The issuer of the non-convertible bond must have one class of
equity security that is listed on Nasdaq, NYSE American or the New York
Stock Exchange (``NYSE'')[.];
    (B) an issuer of equity securities listed on Nasdaq, NYSE American
or NYSE directly or indirectly owns a majority interest in, or is under
common control with, the issuer of the non-convertible bond;
    (C) an issuer of equity securities listed on Nasdaq, NYSE American
or NYSE has guaranteed the non-convertible bond;
    (D) a nationally recognized securities rating organization (an
``NRSRO'') has assigned a current rating to the non-convertible bond
that is no lower than an S&P Corporation ``B'' rating or equivalent
rating by another NRSRO; or
    (E) if no NRSRO has assigned a rating to the issue, an NRSRO has
currently assigned:
    (i) An investment grade rating to an immediately senior issue; or
    (ii) a rating that is no lower than an S&P Corporation ``B''
rating, or an equivalent rating by another NRSRO, to a pari passu or
junior issue.
    [The Exchange anticipates that it will not be ready, prior to the
Second Quarter of 2019, to list the non-convertible bonds of issuers
whose equity securities are listed on NYSE American or NYSE. The
Exchange will post a notification via a Trader Alert at least seven
days prior to accepting applications from issuers to list such non-
convertible bonds.]
    (b)-(c) No change.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In November 2018, the Commission approved amendments to the
Exchange's rules that permit the Exchange to list and trade non-
convertible corporate debt securities (referred to herein as ``bonds''
or ``non-convertible bonds'') on the Nasdaq Bond Exchange.\3\ Under the
Exchange's listing rules, a non-convertible bond is eligible for
initial listing on the Exchange only if it has a principal amount
outstanding or market value of at least $5 million and its issuer
concurrently lists at least one class of an equity security on Nasdaq,
the New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE''), or NYSE American.\4\ In order
to remain listed, a non-convertible bond must maintain a market value
or principal amount outstanding of at least $400,000 and the issuer
must continue to be able to meet its obligations on the listed non-
convertible bonds.\5\ A company that has non-convertible bonds listed
on the Nasdaq Bond Exchange also must make prompt public disclosure of
material information that would reasonably be expected to affect the
value of its listed bonds or influence investors' decisions regarding
such bonds.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84575 (November 13,
2018), 83 FR 58309 (November 19, 2018) (approving SR-NASDAQ-2018-
070, as modified by Amendment Nos. 1-3) (``Approval Order'').
    \4\ Rule 5702(a).
    \5\ Rule 5702(b).
    \6\ Rule 5702(c). Companies must provide notice of such
disclosure to Nasdaq's MarketWatch Department. This obligation to
disclose material information includes material information about
the company's equity securities to the extent the information would
reasonably be expected to affect the value of, or influence
investors' decisions to invest in, the listed bonds, even if those
equity securities are listed on another national securities
exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While Rule 5702(a)(2) allows Nasdaq to list the non-convertible
bonds of an issuer that concurrently lists at least one class of an
equity security on Nasdaq, NYSE or NYSE American, the Exchange noted in
its proposal for the Nasdaq Bond Exchange that upon the effective date
of its proposal the Exchange would be capable of listing and trading
non-convertible bonds only of issuers that list equity securities on
Nasdaq.\7\ The Exchange stated that it expected to be ready to list and
trade bonds of issuers with equity securities listed on NYSE or NYSE
American by the second quarter of 2019.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Approval Order at footnote 11.
    \8\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 13, 2019, Nasdaq announced that it was prepared to list and
trade bonds of issuers with equity securities listed on NYSE or NYSE
American \9\ and Nasdaq began accepting applications to list those
bonds on May 20, 2019. Given

that issuers whose equity securities are listed on NYSE American and
NYSE can now list non-convertible bonds on the Nasdaq Bond Exchange,
Nasdaq proposes to remove language in the rule describing how it
intended to announce the launch of that capability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Nasdaq Data News #2019-3, available at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/TraderNews.aspx?id=dn2019-3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, Nasdaq also proposes to modify Rule 5702(a) to expand
the types of non-convertible bonds eligible to be listed on the Nasdaq
Bond Exchange. At present, only an issuer with a class of equity
security that is listed on Nasdaq, NYSE American or NYSE (collectively
referred to herein as a ``listed company'') can list non-convertible
bonds on the Nasdaq Bond Exchange. Nasdaq proposes to expand the
categories of debt that can be listed to also allow listing of non-
convertible bonds of affiliates of a listed company where: A listed
company directly or indirectly owns a majority interest in, or is under
common control with, the issuer of the non-convertible bond; or a
listed company has guaranteed the non-convertible bond. In addition,
for un-affiliated companies, Nasdaq proposes to allow listing of non-
convertible bonds where a nationally recognized securities rating
organization (an ``NRSRO'') has assigned a current rating to the non-
convertible bond that is no lower than an S&P Corporation ``B'' rating
or equivalent rating by another NRSRO; or if no NRSRO has assigned a
rating to the issue, an NRSRO has currently assigned (i) an investment
grade rating to an immediately senior issue of the same company, or
(ii) a rating that is no lower than an S&P Corporation ``B'' rating, or
an equivalent rating by another NRSRO, to a pari passu or junior issue
of the same company.
    Nasdaq believes that non-convertible bonds satisfying these
conditions, which are the same as the requirements for listing debt on
NYSE American \10\ and convertible debt securities on Nasdaq,\11\ are
appropriate for listing on the Nasdaq Bond Exchange. The current
requirement that the issuer of a non-convertible bond security have a
class of equity listed on Nasdaq, NYSE or NYSE American is designed so
that ``only companies capable of meeting their financial obligations
are eligible to have their non-convertible bonds listed on Nasdaq.''
\12\ Nasdaq notes that listed companies raise debt capital through a
variety of structures designed to satisfy tax or regulatory
obligations, including by the issuance of non-convertible bonds through
entities they directly or indirectly own a majority interest in, or
entities with which they are under common control. In these cases, it
is appropriate to rely on the relationship with the listed company as
evidence that the issuer of the non-convertible bond is capable of
meeting its financial obligations because the issuer is a subsidiary or
affiliate of the listed company. Similarly, in other cases, where the
issuer of the non-convertible bond is not a subsidiary or affiliate of
a listed company, a listed company may nonetheless guarantee the debt
and in these cases the guarantee by the listed company serves to ensure
that if the company cannot, then its guarantor is capable of meeting
the financial obligations on the non-convertible bond. In each case,
Nasdaq notes that debt is a senior security to the listed equity, so
that it is appropriate to list that more senior security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Section 104 of the NYSE American Company Guide. In
addition, NYSE has similar listing conditions, although the NYSE
rule does not permit listing of debt securities where the issuer has
equity securities listed on Nasdaq or NYSE American, is directly or
indirectly owned by, or is under common control with, an issuer
listed on Nasdaq or NYSE American, or where an issuer listed on
Nasdaq or NYSE American has guaranteed the debt security. See
Section 102.03 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
    \11\ See Nasdaq Listing Rule 5515(b)(4). While convertible debt
can be converted into common stock, the debt characteristics of
convertible debt securities are the same as non-convertible bonds.
    \12\ Approval Order at 58313.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq also believes that there are other indications that the
issuer of a non-convertible bond is capable of meeting its financial
obligations, besides the ties to a listed company described above.
Specifically, in the case of these un-affiliated issuers, Nasdaq
believes that it is appropriate to list bonds with a current rating
from an NRSRO that is no lower than an S&P Corporation ``B'' rating or
equivalent rating by another NRSRO because this is another third-party
evaluation of the issuers ability to make interest payments and repay
the loan upon maturity. Similarly, if a more junior issue of the same
company, or an issue of the same company at the same priority in
liquidation (a ``pari passu issue'') has a rating no lower than an S&P
Corporation ``B'' rating or an equivalent rating by another NRSRO, than
it is appropriate to presume that the company will also be capable of
meeting its obligations on the non-convertible bonds to be listed
because those bonds would be repaid in the same priority (if a pari
passu issue) or sooner (if the other issue is more junior) as the ``B''
rated issue. Finally, if no NRSRO has assigned a rating to the issue to
be listed, Nasdaq believes it is appropriate to consider the rating
assigned to the next most senior issue of the same company. If that
rating is an investment grade rating, which is higher than the ``B''
rating standard just described, then that also provides assurance that
the company will be capable of meeting its financial obligations on the
non-convertible bond to be listed.\13\ In assigning ratings, an NRSRO
considers the ability of the issuer to make timely payments of interest
and ultimate payment of principal to the related securities.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See S&P Global ``Understanding Ratings'' available at
https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/about/understanding-ratings,
which identifies ratings of ``BBB'' or higher as investment grade,
at least two levels higher than ``B'' ratings.
    \14\ See, e.g., Exhibit 2, Principles of Credit Ratings, to S&P
Global Form NRSRO, available at https://www.standardandpoors.com/en_US/delegate/getPDF?articleId=2193671&type=COMMENTS&subType=REGULATORY.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq will surveil non-convertible bonds listed under the new
requirements in the same manner that it surveils other non-convertible
bonds.\15\ An issuer listing non-convertible bonds under the proposed
requirements will be subject to the existing continued listing
requirement of Listing Rule 5702(b)(2) that it must be able to meet its
obligations on the listed non-convertible bonds. These issuers are also
subject to the requirement in Listing Rule 5702(c) to make prompt
public disclosure of material information that would reasonably be
expected to affect the value of its listed bonds or influence
investors' decisions regarding such bonds, which will allow Nasdaq to
timely review for events that may cause the issuer to be unable to meet
its obligations on the listed non-convertible bonds. Thus, for example,
an issuer would have to disclose if a non-convertible bond that was
previously guaranteed is no longer guaranteed, or if the issuer or
guarantor declares bankruptcy. An issuer would also have to disclose if
its common stock is delisted, and Nasdaq would consider whether it is
appropriate to continue the listing of the non-convertible bond of an
issuer that was majority-owned, under common control, or guaranteed by
a listed company, which has since been delisted. Nasdaq also would
consider any changes in the rating assigned to the bond or other issues
of the same company that were used to qualify the listed bond.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See Approval Order at 58313.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\16\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\17\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of

trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Specifically, the Exchange notes that the proposed change to
eliminate language from the rule that no longer is applicable will
enhance the transparency of Nasdaq's listing rules and reduce
confusion.
    In addition, the proposed rule change will allow the listing of
non-convertible bonds issued by other companies capable of meeting
their financial obligations on those bonds. The proposed new
alternative conditions are designed to protect investors and the public
interest by ensuring that the bond is issued or guaranteed by an entity
listed on Nasdaq, NYSE American or NYSE; is issued by an entity under
direct, indirect or common control with an issuer listed on Nasdaq,
NYSE American or NYSE; that the issue to be listed (or an issue that is
at the same priority or junior to the issue to be listed) is assigned a
minimum ``B'' rating or its equivalent by an NRSRO; or that the next
most senior issue to the issue to be listed is assigned an investment
grade rating. These conditions are appropriate indicia that the issuer,
or a guarantor, can meet its obligations on the debt. Moreover, these
are the same additional conditions as for listing bonds on NYSE
American and for listing convertible debt on Nasdaq and are similar to
the conditions for listing bonds on NYSE.\18\ As such, the Commission
has previously considered these criteria and approved listing
requirements that rely upon them to provide assurance that an issuer is
capable of meeting its financial obligations. In addition, investors
are already familiar with the availability of bonds with these
characteristics on listing exchanges. Finally, once listed, Nasdaq will
be able to surveil for changes to these conditions that may implicate
the ability of the issuer to meet its obligations on the listed non-
convertible bonds.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ See Section 104 of the NYSE American Company Guide, Nasdaq
Listing Rule 5515(b)(4) and Section 102.03 of the NYSE Listed
Company Manual.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Rather, the proposed rule
change will enhance competition among exchanges by allowing Nasdaq to
list all of the same categories of debt securities as can currently be
listed on NYSE American. In addition, the proposed rule change may
enhance competition among issuers by allowing more issuers to list
their non-convertible bonds on Nasdaq, provided they meet the
requirements of the proposed rule.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \19\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \20\ thereunder.
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose
any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \21\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \22\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78(b)(3)(A).
    \20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \22\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \23\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\24\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay. According to the
Exchange, allowing these securities to list on Nasdaq immediately would
benefit investors due to Nasdaq's real time surveillance of the non-
convertible bonds and enhanced transparency. The Commission also notes
that the proposed listing requirements are substantially the same as
NYSE American and therefore, the Exchange's proposal does not raise any
new or novel issues. Therefore, the Commission believes that waving the
30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest. Accordingly, the Commission designates the
proposed rule change to be operative on upon filing.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \24\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \25\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-008 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-008. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish tomake available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-008 and should
be submitted on or before March 26, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-04471 Filed 3-4-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 42 (Monday, March 4, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14031-14032]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04886]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

Docket No. FAA-2011-1242; Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-16

Proposed Amendment of Class D Airspace; El Monte, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class D Airspace at El Monte
Airport, El Monte, CA. This action, initiated by the biennial review of
the El Monte Airspace Area, would amend the Class D Airspace to
accommodate departures and arrivals, while enhancing the safety and
management of aircraft arriving and departing under Instrument Flight
Rule (IFR) operations at El Monte Airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 18, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2011-
1242; Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-16, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Roberts, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2011-1242 and Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-16) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2011-1242 and Airspace Docket No. 11-AWP-16''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the

closing date for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed
in the docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by amending Class D Airspace at El Monte
Airport, El Monte, CA. The FAA's biennial review of the airspace found
additional controlled airspace is necessary laterally for the safety
and management of aircraft departing and arriving under IFR operations
at El Monte Airport, along with a reduction in the ceiling due to
arrivals to Los Angeles International Airport that overfly El Monte
Airport.
    Class D Airspace designations are published in paragraph 5000, of
FAA Order 7400.9W, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15,
2012, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D
Airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in this Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1) is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend controlled airspace at El Monte Airport, El Monte CA.
    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9 W, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2012, and effective September 15, 201
is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000. Class D Airspace areas.

* * * * *

AWP CA D El Monte Airport, CA [Amended]

El Monte Airport, CA
    (Lat. 34[deg]05'10'' N., long. 118[deg]02'05'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
2,400 feet MSL within a 4-mile radius of El Monte Airport and within
1.8 miles each side of the El Monte Airport 097[deg] bearing
extending from the 4-mile radius to 4.5 miles east of the airport.
This Class D Airspace area is effective during the specific dates
and times established in advance by a Notice to Airmen. The
effective date and time will thereafter be continuously published in
the Airport/Facility Directory.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on February 15, 2013.
Clark Desing,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2013-04886 Filed 3-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: August 7, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 151)]
[Notices]
[Page 44742-44743]
[DOCID:fr07au06-114]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54243; File No. SR-NASD-2006-084]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; National Association of Securities
Dealers, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Revisions to the Series 28 Examination Program

July 31, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 14, 2006, the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
(``NASD'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by NASD. NASD has
designated the proposed rule change as constituting a stated policy,
practice, or interpretation with respect to the meaning,
administration, or enforcement of an existing rule of the self-
regulatory organization pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act
\3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon receipt of this filing by the Commission. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASD is filing revisions to the study outline and selection
specifications for the Limited Principal--Introducing Broker-Dealer
Financial and Operations (Series 28) examination program.\5\ The
proposed revisions update the material to reflect changes to the laws,
rules and regulations covered by the examination and to better reflect
the duties and responsibilities of an introducing broker-dealer
financial and operations principal. NASD is not proposing any textual
changes to the By-Laws, Schedules to the By-Laws, or Rules of NASD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ NASD also is proposing corresponding revisions to the Series
28 question bank, but based upon instruction from the Commission
staff, NASD is submitting SR-NASD-2006-084 for immediate
effectiveness pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule
19b-4(f)(1) thereunder, and is not filing the question bank for
Commission review. See letter to Alden S. Adkins, Senior Vice
President and General Counsel, NASD Regulation, from Belinda Blaine,
Associate Director, Division of Market Regulation (``Division''),
Commission, dated July 24, 2000. The question bank is available for
Commission review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The revised study outline is available on NASD's Web site (http://www.nasd.com
), at NASD, and at the Commission.\6\ The Series 28

selection specifications have been submitted to the Commission under
separate cover with a request for confidential treatment pursuant to
Rule 24b-2 under the Act.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Telephone conversation between Mia Zur, Special Counsel,
Division, Commission, and Afshin Atabaki, Counsel, NASD, dated July
19, 2006.
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.24b-2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NASD included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NASD has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Section 15A(g)(3) of the Act \8\ requires NASD to prescribe
standards of training, experience, and competence for persons
associated with NASD members. In accordance with that provision, NASD
has developed examinations, and administers examinations developed by
other self-regulatory organizations, that are designed to establish
that persons associated with NASD members have attained specified
levels of competence and knowledge. NASD periodically reviews the
content of the examinations to determine whether revisions are
necessary or appropriate in view of changes pertaining to the subject
matter covered by the examinations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(g)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to NASD Rule 1022(c), members that are subject to the net
capital requirements of SEC Rule 15c3-1,\9\ other than those members
that are subject to the net capital requirements of SEC Rules 15c3-
1(a)(1)(ii),\10\ (a)(2)(i) \11\ or (a)(8),\12\ are required to
designate as a Limited Principal--Introducing Broker-Dealer Financial
and Operations those individuals associated with them who are
responsible for the members' financial and operational management,
including, but not limited to, final approval and responsibility for
the accuracy of financial reports submitted to regulators. In addition,
Rule 1022(c) provides that the chief financial officer of such members
must be a Limited Principal--Introducing Broker-Dealer Financial and
Operations. The Series 28 examination is an NASD examination that
qualifies an individual to function as a Limited Principal--Introducing
Broker-Dealer Financial and Operations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-1.
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-1(a)(1)(ii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-1(a)(2)(i).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.15c3-1(a)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A committee of industry representatives, together with NASD staff,
recently undertook a review of the Series 28 examination program. As a
result of this review, NASD is proposing to make the following
revisions to the study outline to reflect changes to the laws, rules
and regulations covered by the examination and to better reflect the
duties and responsibilities of an introducing broker-dealer financial
and operations principal. NASD is

proposing to add a section on Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board
Rule G-37 (Political Contributions and Prohibitions on Municipal
Securities Business). NASD also is proposing to add a section on SEC
Regulation SHO, including Rules 200 (Definition of ``Short Sale'' and
Marking Requirements) \13\ and 203 (Borrowing and Delivery
Requirements).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 242.200.
    \14\ 17 CFR 242.203.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NASD is proposing to add sections on NASD Rules 1150 (Executive
Representatives), 2350 (Broker-Dealer Conduct on the Premises of
Financial Institutions), 2370 (Borrowing from or Lending to Customers),
3012 (Supervisory Control System), 3013 (Annual Certification of
Compliance and Supervisory Processes), 3510 (Business Continuity Plan)
and 9800 (Temporary Cease and Desist Orders).
    In addition, NASD is proposing to revise the study outline to
remove the sections on NASD Rules 1100 (Foreign Associates), 1110
(formerly Registration of Government Securities Principals and
Representatives) and 2320 (Best Execution and Interpositioning). NASD
also is proposing to remove the sections on Form X17F-1A (Report for
Missing, Lost, Stolen, or Counterfeit Securities), NASD Certificate of
Incorporation and certain articles (Articles VII, XII, XIII and XV) of
the NASD By-Laws.
    Further, NASD is proposing to add a new section covering certain
rules of the NASD Uniform Practice Code (``Uniform Practice Rules'').
NASD is proposing to add the Uniform Practice Rules under Section 4 and
to move the section on Other Relevant Regulations and Interpretations
(formerly under Section 4) to Section 5, a new section.
    As a result of the revisions discussed above, the number of
questions on several sections of the study outline were modified as
follows: Keeping and Preservation of Records and Broker-Dealer
Financial Reporting Requirements, increased from 15 to 16 questions;
Uniform Practice Rules (new section), 5 questions; and Other Relevant
Regulations and Interpretations, increased from 24 to 28 questions.
    NASD is proposing these changes to the entire content of the Series
28 examination, including the selection specifications and question
bank. The number of questions on the Series 28 examination will
increase from 85 to 95 questions. Candidates will continue to have 2
hours to complete the exam. Also, each question will continue to count
one point, and each candidate must correctly answer 70 percent of the
questions to receive a passing grade.
2. Statutory Basis
    NASD believes that the proposed revisions to the Series 28
examination program are consistent with the provisions of Sections
15A(b)(6) \15\ and 15A(g)(3) of the Act,\16\ which authorize NASD to
prescribe standards of training, experience, and competence for persons
associated with NASD members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(g)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    NASD does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Act \17\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1) thereunder,\18\ in
that the proposed rule change constitutes a stated policy, practice, or
interpretation with respect to the meaning, administration, or
enforcement of an existing rule of the self-regulatory organization.
NASD proposes to implement the revised Series 28 examination program on
August 15, 2006. NASD will announce the implementation date in a Notice
to Members to be published on the same date as this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-NASD-2006-084 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASD-2006-084. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of NASD. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number
SR-NASD-2006-084 and should be submitted on or before August 28, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy M. Morris
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-12686 Filed 8-4-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P