[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69740-69741]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27416]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP19-500-000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Availability of the
Environmental Assessment for the Proposed Palmyra to South Sioux City
A-Line Abandonment Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared an environmental assessment (EA) for the
Palmyra to South Sioux City A-Line Abandonment Project, proposed by
Northern Natural Gas Company (Northern) in the above-referenced docket.
Northern requests authorization to abandon a segment of its A-Line
Pipeline and construct, own, and operate two new natural gas pipeline
loops.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ A loop is a pipeline that is constructed adjacent to another
pipeline for the purpose of increasing capacity in this portion of
the system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EA assesses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the Palmyra to South Sioux City A-Line
Abandonment Project in accordance with the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The FERC staff concludes that approval
of the proposed project, with appropriate mitigating measures, would
not constitute a major federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
    The proposed Palmyra to South Sioux City A-Line Abandonment Project
is in Nebraska and includes the following facilities:
     Abandonment in place of 44.2 miles of 20-inch-diameter and
14.8 miles of 16-inch-diameter mainline in Otoe, Lancaster, Saunders,
and Dodge Counties (M581A);
     abandonment in place of 58.7 miles of 16-inch-diameter
mainline in Dodge, Burt, Thurston, and Dakota Counties (M570A);
     construction of 1.7 miles of new 24-inch-diameter pipeline
loop in Otoe County (Palmyra North D-Line Loop);
     construction of 2.5 miles of new 24-inch-diameter pipeline
loop in Dodge County (Fremont North D-Line Loop);
     construction of a new pig \2\ launcher and two valve sites
within the existing Palmyra Compressor Station at the beginning of the
Palmyra D-Line Loop and a pig receiver and one valve site at the end of
the pipeline loop; and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ A ``pig'' is a tool that the pipeline company inserts into
and pushes through the pipeline for cleaning the pipeline,
conducting internal inspections, or other purposes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     construction of a new pig launcher and one valve site
within the existing Fremont Compressor Station and one valve site at
the end of the Fremont North D-Line Loop.
    The Commission mailed a copy of the Notice of Availability to
federal, state, and local government representatives and agencies;
elected officials; environmental and public interest groups; Native
American tribes; potentially affected landowners and other interested
individuals and groups; and newspapers and libraries in the project
area. The EA is only available in electronic format. It may be viewed
and downloaded from the FERC's website (www.ferc.gov), on the
Environmental Documents page (https://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/enviro/eis.asp). In addition, the EA may be accessed by using the
eLibrary link on the FERC's website. Click on the eLibrary link
(https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp), click on General
Search, and enter the docket number in the ``Docket Number'' field,
excluding the last three digits (i.e., CP19-500). Be sure you have
selected an appropriate date range. For assistance, please contact FERC
Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at (866) 208-
3676, or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any person wishing to comment on the EA may do so. Your comments
should focus on the EA's disclosure and discussion of potential
environmental effects, reasonable alternatives, and measures to avoid
or lessen environmental impacts. The more specific your comments, the
more useful they will be. To ensure that the Commission has the
opportunity to consider your comments prior to making its decision on
this project, it is

important that we receive your comments in Washington, DC, on or before
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on January 13, 2020.
    For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to file
your comments to the Commission. The Commission encourages electronic
filing of comments and has staff available to assist you at (866) 208-
3676 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please carefully follow these
instructions so that your comments are properly recorded.
    (1) You can file your comments electronically using the eComment
feature on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov) under the link to
Documents and Filings. This is an easy method for submitting brief,
text-only comments on a project;
    (2) You can also file your comments electronically using the
eFiling feature on the Commission's website (www.ferc.gov) under the
link to Documents and Filings. With eFiling, you can provide comments
in a variety of formats by attaching them as a file with your
submission. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking
on ``eRegister.'' You must select the type of filing you are making. If
you are filing a comment on a particular project, please select
``Comment on a Filing''; or
    (3) You can file a paper copy of your comments by mailing them to
the following address. Be sure to reference the project docket number
(CP19-500-000) with your submission: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Room 1A,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Any person seeking to become a party to the proceeding must file a
motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedures (18 CFR 385.214). Motions to intervene are more
fully described at http://www.ferc.gov/resources/guides/how-to/intervene.asp. Only intervenors have the right to seek rehearing or
judicial review of the Commission's decision. The Commission may grant
affected landowners and others with environmental concerns intervenor
status upon showing good cause by stating that they have a clear and
direct interest in this proceeding which no other party can adequately
represent. Simply filing environmental comments will not give you
intervenor status, but you do not need intervenor status to have your
comments considered.
    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC website (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. The eLibrary link
also provides access to the texts of all formal documents issued by the
Commission, such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.

    Dated: December 13, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-27416 Filed 12-18-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 29 (Monday, February 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9276-9277]
[FR Doc No: 2023-03018]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-ORD-2015-0765; FRL-10643-01-ORD]

Request for Public Nominations of Experts to Serve on a Review
Panel

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is seeking
nominations for technical experts to serve as Special Government
Employees (SGEs) on a review panel under the authority of the Board of
Scientific Counselors (BOSC), a federal advisory committee to the
Office of Research and Development (ORD). Selected experts will
participate in the review of the ORD's draft report on a case study
that uses value of information (VOI) analysis to weigh the public
health and economic trade-offs associated with the timeliness,
uncertainty, and costs of the draft EPA Transcriptomic Assessment
Product (ETAP). The ETAP is a proposed ORD assessment product that
utilizes a standardized short-term in vivo study design and data
analysis procedures to develop transcriptomic-based toxicity values for
data poor chemicals. The review will take place between April and July
2023. Submission of nominations should be made via the BOSC website at:
https://www.epa.gov/bosc.

DATES: Nominations should be submitted by March 3, 2023, per
instructions below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public needing
additional information regarding this Notice and Request for
Nominations

may contact Mr. Tom Tracy, Office of Science Policy, Office of Research
and Development, Mail Code B343-01, 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711; via phone/voice mail at:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or
via email at: [email protected]. General information concerning the
BOSC can be found at the following website: https://www.epa.gov/bosc.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The BOSC is a chartered Federal Advisory Committee established by
the EPA to provide independent scientific and technical peer review,
advice, consultation, and recommendations about ORD. As a Federal
Advisory Committee, the BOSC conducts business in accordance with the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) (5 U.S.C. app. 2) and related
regulations. The BOSC is comprised of an Executive Committee and two
supporting subcommittee(s): Social and Community Science, and Climate
Change. Please visit https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-office-research-and-development-ord to learn more about ORD's research
programs. Members of the BOSC constitute a distinguished body of non-
EPA scientists, engineers, and economists who are experts in their
respective fields. The chartered BOSC provides scientific advice to the
EPA Administrator on a variety of EPA science and research topics. All
the work of BOSC standing committees and ad-hoc panels is conducted
under the auspices of the chartered BOSC. The chartered BOSC executive
committee review all BOSC standing committee and ad-hoc panel draft
reports and determine whether each meets the BOSC's criteria and high-
quality standards required to deliver them to the EPA Administrator.
    The BOSC will evaluate ORD's draft report on a case study that uses
value of information (VOI) analysis to weigh the public health and
economic trade-offs associated with the timeliness, uncertainty, and
costs of the draft EPA Transcriptomic Assessment Product (ETAP). The
ETAP is a proposed ORD assessment product that utilizes a standardized
short-term in vivo study design and data analysis procedures to develop
transcriptomic-based toxicity values for data poor chemicals. The draft
report will be provided in the BOSC docket prior to the meeting and
will present an in-depth comparison of the ETAP with traditional
toxicity testing and human health assessment processes across different
chemical exposure scenarios, health endpoint valuations, exposure
mitigation costs, and decision contexts. The review of the draft report
on the VOI case study by the BOSC is being performed in close
coordination with a separate BOSC review of the underlying scientific
studies supporting development and implementation of the ETAP.

Expertise Sought

    The EPA invites nominations of individuals to serve as SGEs with
expertise or extensive experience in the following scientific
disciplines and topic areas as they relate to human health and the
environment:

 Decision analysis, including value of information
 Human health chemical risk assessment
 Toxicology
 Exposure science, including computational exposure modeling
 Statistics, including Bayesian methods
 Health economics
 Transcriptomics, including dose response modeling of
transcriptomic data

Selection Criteria

    Nominations will be evaluated on the basis of several criteria
including: (a) demonstrated scientific and/or technical credentials and
disciplinary expertise, knowledge, and experience in relevant fields;
(b) availability to serve and willingness to commit time to the
committee (approximately one to three meetings per year both by
teleconferences and possibly face-to-face meetings); (c) absence of
financial conflicts of interest; (d) absence of an appearance of a lack
of impartiality; (e) demonstrated ability to work constructively and
effectively on committees; and (f) background and experiences that
would contribute to the diversity of viewpoints, e.g., workforce
sector, geographical location, social, cultural, and educational
backgrounds, and professional affiliations.

Process and Deadline for Submitting Nominations

    Any interested person or organization may nominate qualified
persons to be considered for appointment as an SGE. Nominations should
be submitted via the BOSC website at: https://www.epa.gov/bosc.
Nominations should be submitted no later than March 3, 2023. To receive
full consideration, nominations should include all the information
requested. EPA's nomination form requests: contact information about
the person making the nomination; contact information about the
nominee; the disciplinary and specific areas of expertise of the
nominee; the nominee's curriculum vita and/or resume; and additional
information that would be useful for considering the nomination such as
background and qualifications (e.g., current position, educational
background, expertise, research areas), experience relevant to one or
more of ORD's research programs, service on other advisory committees
and professional societies, and availability to participate as an SGE.
Persons having questions about the nomination procedures, or who are
unable to submit nominations through the BOSC website, should contact
Mr. Tom Tracy, as indicated above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section of this notice.

Mary Ross,
Director, Office of Science Advisor, Policy and Engagement.
[FR Doc. 2023-03018 Filed 2-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 159 (Wednesday, August 17, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 54799-54800]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19569]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP16-486-000, PF16-3-000]

Notice of Application Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC

    Take notice that on July 29, 2016, Millennium Pipeline Company
(Millennium), One Blue Hill Plaza, Pearl River, New York 10965, filed
in Docket No. CP16-486-000 an application pursuant to section 7(c) of
the Natural Gas Act (NGA), and Part 157 of the Commission's
Regulations, requesting a certificate of public convenience and
necessity authorizing their Eastern System Upgrade Project. This
project will provide an additional 223 million cubic feet per day
(MMcf/d) of firm transportation capacity from Millennium's Corning
Compressor Station (CS) to an existing interconnection with Algonquin
Gas Transmission, LLC located in Ramapo, New York, all as more fully
set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and
open to public inspection.
    The filing may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to
Georgia Carter, Vice President and General Counsel, Millennium Pipeline
Company, LLC, 109 North Post Oak Lane, Suite 210, Houston, TX 77024, by
calling<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailing<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Specifically, Millennium proposes to construct, operate, and
maintain (1) Approximately 7.8-miles of 30- and 36-inch-diameter
pipeline loop in Orange County, New York; (2) a new 22,400 horsepower
(HP) compressor station in Sullivan County, New York; (3) additional
22,400 HP at the existing Hancock Compressor Station in Delaware
County, New York; (4) modifications to the existing Ramapo Meter and
Regulator Station in Rockland County, New York; (5) modifications to
the Wagoner Interconnect in Orange County, New York; (6) additional
pipeline appurtenant facilities at the existing Huguenot and Westtown
Meter and Regulating Stations in Orange County, New York; and (7) an
alternate interconnect to the 16-inch-diameter Valley Lateral at
milepost 7.6 of the Project.
    Millennium states that 202.5 MMcf/d of project capacity is
committed under precedent agreements with local distribution companies
and municipalities. Millennium requests that that the Commission issue
the requested authorizations by July 31, 2017, in order to allow
Millennium sufficient time to meet a targeted in-service date in
September 2018. Millennium proposes to charge negotiated rates to its
project shippers and existing Rate Schedule FT-1 rates for service on
the expansion capacity created by the project. The cost of the project
is $275,000,000.
    On February 5, 2016, the Commission staff granted Millennium's
request to utilize the Pre-Filing Process and assigned Docket No. PF16-
3-000 to staff activities involved in the above referenced project.
Now, as of the filing of the July 29, 2016 application, the Pre-Filing
Process for this project has ended. From this time forward, this
proceeding will be conducted in Docket No. CP16-486-000, as noted in
the caption of this Notice.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the

Commission staff will either: Complete its environmental assessment
(EA) and place it into the Commission's public record (eLibrary) for
this proceeding; or issue a Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review. If a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review is issued, it
will indicate, among other milestones, the anticipated date for the
Commission staff's issuance of the EA for this proposal. The filing of
the EA in the Commission's public record for this proceeding or the
issuance of a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to
notify federal and state agencies of the timing for the completion of
all necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal
authorizations within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission
staff's EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit five copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit original and five copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 1, 2016.

    Dated: August 11, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-19569 Filed 8-16-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 107 (Monday, June 5, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36636-36637]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11883]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2023-1282]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of New Approval of Information Collection: Certificates of
Waivers

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval for a new information collection.
The purpose of this notice is to allow 60 days for public comment. The
FAA proposes collecting information related to requests for certificate
of waivers to operate Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) in deviation from
the normal operating rules. The FAA will use the collected information
to make determinations whether to authorize or deny the requested
operation of UAS. The proposed information collection is necessary to
issue such authorizations or denials consistent with the FAA's mandate
to ensure safe and efficient use of national airspace.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by July 30, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Please send written comments:
    By Electronic Docket: www.regulations.gov (Enter docket number into
search field).
    By mail: FAA HQ, Bldg. 10B, 5th Floor, Desk 5E4TS, 600 Independence
Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20597.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rahat Ali by email at:
[email protected]; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-XXXX.
    Title: Certificates of Waivers under 14 CFR 91.903.
    Form Numbers: Not applicable.
    Type of Review: Approval of new Information Collection.
    Background: Title 14, part 91 of the Code of Federal Regulations
prescribes the rules governing the operation of aircraft within the
United States. Included in this is the operation of unmanned aircraft
systems (UAS), commonly known as drones, by both civil and public
aircraft operators. 14 CFR 91.903 allows for operators of aircraft to
apply for a certificate of waiver authorizing the operator to deviate
from the rules listed in Sec.  91.905 if the proposed operation can be
conducted safely.
    To process certificate of waiver requests, the FAA requires the
name of the person or organization sponsoring the request, mailing
address, information related to any pending or to prior waiver requests
that were denied or rescinded, the regulation sought to deviate from,
time and location of the proposed operation, the make and model of the
aircraft, and the pilot's name, address, and certificate number and
rating. This information is necessary for the FAA to meet its statutory
mandate of maintaining a safe and efficient national airspace. See 49
U.S.C. 40103, 44701, and 44807. The FAA will use the requested
information to determine if the proposed UAS operation can be conducted
safely.
    The FAA proposes to use a web portal accessible from the FAA
website to process certificate of waiver requests from the public. To
initially access the web portal, the FAA requires respondents to
complete an Access Request Form. This form requires the respondent to
provide the date, the respondent's name, telephone number, and email
address, to identify if the respondent is a civil or public operator,
and to provide a general reason why operating a UAS.
    Respondents: UAS operators seeking to a certificate of waiver under
14 CFR 91.903. Between 2023-2026, the FAA estimates that it will
receive a total of 5,105 certificate of waiver requests with 4,925
coming from public users and 180

coming from civil users. The FAA also estimates that it will receive a
total 2,572 requests to initially access the web portal.
    Frequency: The requested information will need to be provided each
time a respondent requests a certificate of waiver under Part 91 and
the first time that a respondent requests to access the web portal.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: The FAA estimates the
respondents will take an average of 15 minutes to complete the Access
Request Form and 120 minutes to request a certificate of waiver.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 3,283 hours for those completing
certificate of waiver requests. 214 hours for those completing the
Access Request Form.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 31, 2023.
Rahat Ali,
General Engineer.AJV-P22
[FR Doc. 2023-11883 Filed 6-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


July 25, 2012

MEMORANDUM

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON D.C., 20460

OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETY  AND POLLUTION PREVENTION

SUBJECT: 	Reassessment of  Drinking Water Assessment to Support Bifenazate Use on Herb Subgroup 19A, Fruiting Vegetable Group 8-10, Pome Fruit Group 11-10, and Timothy Grass (PC Code: 002586; DP Barcode: 402952)

DECtSION:   44h 11'1

TO:

FROM:

Barbara Madden, Team Leader

Andrew Ertman, Risk Manager Reviewer

Registration Division

James A. Hetrick Ph.D., Senior Science A 	viso	tt

t/( f-/zr)rL_

THROUGH:

Rosanna Louie-Juzwiak, RAPL

Environmental  Risk Branch 3

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

Dana Spatz, Branch Chi	'"?  /1. jt '1....-

Environmental Risk Branch

Environmental Fate and Effects Division (7507P)

EXECUTIVE  SUMMARY

A reassessment of drinking water exposure was conducted  to support new uses of bifenazate (Acramite

The proposed new use requests ground spray applications of 0.375 to 0.5 lb ai/A.  Bifenazate application is proposed as ground spray for all crop groups.  Additionally, aerial applications are proposed for the Fruiting Vegetables Group 8-10.  The proposed use on timothy grass requests ground spray, aerial spray, and chemigation application of  0.495 to 0.747 lb ai/A.

The drinking water assessment was conducted using a total toxic residue approach. Total toxic residues include bifenazate and its degradation product of concern, D1989.  Based on Tier II

/	2087757

surface water modeling, the concentration of bifenazate and D1989 for the proposed new uses should not exceed 9.6  g/L for a 1 inlO year daily peak, 1.7  giL for 1 in 10 year annual average, and 1.2  g/L for 30 year annual average.   Tier I ground modeling indicates the bifenazate and D1989 concentration should not exceed 0.014  giL for peak and long-term average concentrations.   No monitoring data are available to assess bifenazate or D1989 concentrations  in surface waters.  The predicted concentrations  of bifenazate and D1989 for the proposed uses are lower than estimated Tier I drinking water concentrations  (EDWC) for beans, edible podded legumes, succulent-shelled  peas, beans, and soybeans uses.  Therefore, EFED's previous recommendation  was that HED use the surface water source drinking water exposure estimates previously calculated for these uses, i.e., bifenazate and Dl989 should not exceed 37.3 g/L for the daily peak and 11.2  g/L for the annual average.

At the request of HED, EFED has now developed refined Tier II EDWCs for the use on beans, edible podded legumes, succulent-shelled  peas, beans, and soybeans.  EFED refined the EDWCs using Tier II PRZM/EXAMS  modeling for standard scenarios for beans and soybeans (Table 1). The KS com scenario was used to represent a soybean scenario because com and soybeans are a common crop rotation.  This analysis indicates that the recommended bifenazate and D1989 concentrations  should not exceed 28.58 J.lg/L for the 1 in 10 year daily peak and 6.69 J.lg/L for the 30 year annual average (Table 1).

Table 1: PCA Corrected Tier II EDWCs for Beans, Edible Podded Legumes, Succulent

 MS Soybean

19.08

4.48

2.62

20.88

5.08

3.30MI Beans10.854.763.6<IP_ADDRESS>KS Corn<IP_ADDRESS>21.736.855.46IL Bean26.578.095.8128.588.926.69

 Analysis

Tier II surface water EDWCs  were calculated using PRZM (E_esticide Root Zone Model, version

3.12.3, June 2006) and EXAMS (EXposure Analysis Modeling  ystem, version <IP_ADDRESS>, April 2005) models in the PE5 shell.  All Tier II surface water modeling was corrected for percent cropped area (PCA).

 Surface Water

The chemical input parameters for bifenazate and degradation product D1989 are shown in Table

2.   Pesticide application (i.e.,  method, rate, application interval) was conducted using  two applications of  0.75 lb a.i./A at a 14 day interval by aerial or ground spray.  The EDWCs were corrected using a PCA of 0.91.

Table 2. Input Parameters Used in PRZM-EXAMS and SCIGROW  Modeling to Estimate

Bifenazate and D1989 Drinking Water Concentrations.

 Parameter Value Comment Source Molecular Weight 300.36 g/mol Vapor Pressure lE-7 torr Koc 3011 Lowest non- sand Koc for Dl989 MRID 44464955

MRID 44464956Hydrolysis Half-life  (pH=7)StableNo data for

Dl989MRID 44464952Photodegradation  in Water Half-lifeStableMRID 44464953Aerobic Soil Metabolism Half-life42.7 days90th%

confidence bound of the mean TTR half-lifeMRID 45144002

MRID 47607902Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism Half-life85.4 days2X aerobic soil metabolism half-lifeEFED GuidanceAnaerobic Aquatic Metabolism Half-lifeStableNo dataEFED GuidanceAppendix

AERIAL  APPLICATIONS

MS Soybeans

stored as MSBEAIR.out

Chemical:  Bifenazate

PRZM environment: MSsoybeanSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 13:58:06

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv  modified Tueday,  26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w03940.dvf    modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:14

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

 Year

1961Peak

14.0296 hr

12.8921 Day

10.7360 Day

9.02390 Day

7.507Yearly

2.84119628.8068.1286.0974.8734.1692.686196323.0921.1315.3110.198.4423.83 3196410.599.8688.9036.7075.9783.859196512.4711.528.756.0045.0773.5671966 9.9839.3867.2695.9185.6023.365196710.9210.068.4996.35.5213.10819688.5937 .9195.9044.5614.0112.47219698.2357.5596.024.7064.4212.3719708.3447.6725. 664.3423.8862.66119718.8548.1536.435.8115.2023.13919728.9028.2116.1564.9 094.1572.62219738.3047.6255.5914.1873.5262.14419748.2857.6225.6034.1783. 9132.368197521.6820.4917.6712.0710.845.169197616.915.611.928.7217.7624.8 44197710.549.778.1716.7465.913.74519788.7928.1116.6185.3854.5482.9419793 5.9333.2225.3917.9214.946.621198011.1610.398.1476.5855.6254.455198136.47 33.8924.3815.0112.245.632198218.7917.5115.1914.4412.696.792198310.349.65 17.546.4185.9014.558198410.369.5728.0396.5866.0243.726198511.6310.778.21 76.4996.2913.68419869.9979.2137.3136.1785.2873.222198714.413.2811.938.36 77.0153.56219888.7398.066.4655.174.6063.002198912.311.338.9716.4635.4283 .12219908.8868.2116.174.683.8952.573

Sorted results

 Prob. 	Peak 96 hr 21 Day 600ay 90Day Yearly 0.032258064516129 36.47 33.89 25.39 17.92 14.94 6.792 0.0645161290322581 35.93 33.22 24.38 15.01 12.69 6.621 0.0967741935483871 23.09 21.13 17.67 14.44 12.24 5.632 0.129032258064516 21.68 20.49 15.31 12.07 10.84 5.169 0.161290322580645 18.79 17.51 15.19 10.19 8.442 4.844 0.193548387096774 16.9 15.6 11.93 9.023 7.762 4.558 0.225806451612903 14.4 13.28 11.92 8.721 7.507 4.455 0.258064516129032 14.02 12.89 10.73 8.367 7.015 3.859 0.290322580645161 12.47 11.52 8.971 6.746 6.291 3.833 0.32258064516129 12.3 11.33 8.903 6.707 6.024 3.745 0.354838709677419 11.63 10.77 8.75 6.586 5.978 3.726 0.387096774193548 11.16 10.39 8.499 6.585 5.91 3.684 0.419354838709677 10.92 10.06 8.217 6.499 5.901 3.567 0.451612903225806 10.59 9.868 8.171 6.463 5.625 3.562 0.483870967741936 10.54 9.77 8.147 6.418 5.602 3.365 0.516129032258065 10.36 9.651 8.039 6.3 5.521 3.222 0.548387096774194 10.34 9.572 7.54 6.178 5.428 3.139 0.580645161290323 9.997 9.386 7.313 6.004 5.287 3.122 0.612903225806452 9.983 9.213 7.269 5.918 5.202 3.108 0.645161290322581 8.902 8.211 6.618 5.811 5.077 3.002 0.67741935483871 8.886 8.211 6.465 5.385 4.606 2.94 0<PHONE_NUMBER>54839 8.854 8.153 6.43 5.17 4.548 2.841 0.741935483870968 8.806 8.128 6.17 4.909 4.421 2.686

 0.774193548387097 8.792 8.111 6.156 4.873 4.169 2.661 0.806451612903226 8.739 8.06 6.097 4.706 4.157 2.622 0.838709677419355 8.593 7.919 6.02 4.68 4.011 2.573 0.870967741935484 8.344 7.672 5.904 4.561 3.913 2.472 0.903225806451613 8.304 7.625 5.66 4.342 3.895 2.37 0.935483870967742 8.285 7 622 5.603 4.187 3.886 2.368 0.967741935483871 8.235 7.559 5.591 4.178 3.526 2.144

 0.1 22.949 21.066 17.434 14.203 12.1 5.5857Average of yearly averages:  3.62273333333333

Inputs generated  by pc5.pl- Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run: Output  File: MSBEAIR Metfile: 	w03940.dvf

PRZM scenario: 	MSsoybeanSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file: 	ir298.exv

Chemical  Name: Description Molecular weight

Bifenazate Variable  Name mwt	300.36

Value g/mol

Units

Comments

Henry's Law Cons!. Vapor Pressure Solubility   sol

Kd 	Kd

henry vapr

3.76

IE-7 mg/L mg/L

atm-m/C3/mol

torr

Koc	Koc	3011

Photolysis  half-life 		kdp Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism Anaerobic  Aquatic Metabolism Aerobic Soil Metabolism Hydrolysis: 	 pH 7

Method:     CAM 	2

Incorporation  Depth:   DEPI

mg/L

khacw khacs asm

integer

days 	Half-life

85.4 	days 	Halfife days 	Halfife

42.7 	days 	Halftfe days 	Half-life

See PRZM  manual

em

Application  Rate: 	TAPP Application  Efficiency:

Spray Drift 	DRFT Application  Date 	Date

0.84 	kg/ha

APPEFF    0.95 	fraction

0.16 	fraction  of application  rate applied to pond

15-6 	dd/mrn or dd/mmrn or dd-mrn or dd-mmrn

Interval  I      interval 	14

app. rate I    apprate 	0.84

Record 17: FILTRA IPSCND UPTKF

Record  18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT FEXTRC   0.5

days kg/ha

Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Flag for Index Res. Run 	IR Flag for runoff calc.    RUNOFF   total

Reservoir

none, monthly or total( average of entire run)

Ml Beans

stored as MIBEAIR.out

Chemical:  Bifenazate

PRZM environment: MlbeansSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 13:56:44

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv  modified Tueday,  26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile:  w 14826.dvf   modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:04

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

 Year Peak 96 br 21 Day 60Day 90 Day Yearly 1961 7.837 7.276 5.494 4.437 4.459 2.028 1962 9.989 9.395 7.52 6.221 5.433 3.363 1963 9.824 9.249 7.471 6.011 5.417 3.554 1964 12.93 12.25 11.05 9.427 8.358 4.842 1965 11.04 10.52 8.772 7.233 7.008 5.116 1966 10.85 10.27 8.549 7.02 6.306 4.591 1967 12.53 11.82 10.06 8.104 7.267 4.772 1968 15.17 14.32 11.71 10.17 9.75 6.164 1969 17.37 16.43 14.16 11.41 10.23 6.978 1970 15.4 14.65 12.8 10.73 9.833 7.023 1971 12.45 11.92 11.14 9.708 8.842 6.531 1972 14.8 14.05 11.73 10.04 9.321 6.584 1973 12.17 11.57 9.641 8.057 7.229 5.829

 1974 11.19 10.81 9.084 7.52 6.731 4.975 1975 13.33 12.59 11.6 9.497 9.121 5.978 1976 19.01 18.02 14.72 11.09 9.918 6.888 1977 14.08 13.49 11.15 9.176 8.224 6.207 1978 11.38 10.8 8.94 7.506 6.746 5.205 1979 16.76 16.02 13.4 10.19 9.07 5.685 1980 15.95 15.08 12.59 10.64 9.604 6.531 1981 12.77 12.14 10.86 9.174 8.523 6.567 1982 12.36 1175 10 8.614 7.852 5.929 1983 16.19 15.26 12.41 9.73 8.751 6.001 1984 11.51 10.92 9.174 8.31 7.617 5.661 1985 11.15 10.65 8.947 7.53 7.475 5.619 1986 12.23 11.61 9.873 8.461 8.104 6.221 1987 1175 11.15 9.246 7.958 7.585 5.999 1988 11.29 10.7 9.05 7.936 7.364 5.534 1989 12.5 11.9 9.848 8.593 8.129 5.733 1990 11.37 10.78 8.939 7.481 6.826 5.281Soned  results

 Prob. 	Peak

0.03225806451612996 hr

19.0121 Day

18.0260Day

14.7290Day

11.41Yearly

10.23

7.0230.064516129032258117.3716.4314.1611.099.9186.9780.09677419354838711 6.7616.0213.410.739.8336.8880.12903225806451616.1915.2612.810.649.756.58 40.16129032258064515.9515.0812.5910.199.6046.5670.19354838709677415.414. 6512.4110.179.3216.5310.22580645161290315.1714.3211.7310.049.1216.5310.2 5806451612903214.814.0511.719.739.076.2210.29032258064516114.0813.4911.6 9.7088.8426.2070.3225806451612913.3312.5911.159.4978.7516.1640.354838709 67741912.9312.2511.149.4278.5236.0010.38709677419354812.7712.1411.059.17 68.3585.9990.41935483870967712.5311.9210.869.1748.2245.9780.451612903225 80612.511.910.068.6148.1295.9290.48387096774193612.4511.82108.5938.1045. 8290.51612903225806512.3611759.8738.4617.8525.7330.54838709677419412.231 1.619.8488.317.6175.6850.5 8064516129032312.1711.579.6418.1047.5855.6610.61290322580645211.7511.159 .2468.0577.4755.6190.64516129032258111.5110.929.1747.9587.3645.5340.6774 193548387111.3810.819.0847.9367.2675.2810.70967741935483911.3710.89.057. 537.2295.2050.74193548387096811.2910.788.9477.527.0085.1160.774193548387 09711.1910.78.947.5066.8264.9750.80645161290322611.1510.658.9397.4816.74 64.8420.83870967741935511.0410.528.7727.2336.7314.7720.87096774193548410 .8510.278.5497.026.3064.5910.9032258064516139.9899.3957.526.2215.4333.55 40.9354838709677429.8249.2497.4716.0115.4173.3630.9677419354838717.8377. 2765.4944.4374.4592.0280.1 	16.703 	15.944 	13.34 	10.7219.8247 	6.8576

Average of yearly averages:

5.57963333333333Inputs generated  by pe5.pl- Novemeber 2006Data used for this run:Output File: MIBEAIR

Metfile: 	wl4826.dvfPRZM scenario: 	MlbeansSTD.txt EXAMS environment tile: 	ir298.exv Chemical  Name: 	Bifenazate

Description 	Variable  Name 	Value

Units 	Comments

 Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism kbacw 85.4 days Halfife Anaerobic  Aquatic Metabolism kbacs days Hal fife Aerobic Soil Metabolism asm 42.7 days Halfife Hydrolysis: 	pH 7 days Half-lifeMethod:     CAM          2                 integer        See PRZM manual

Incorporation  Depth:   DEPI                             em

Application  Rate:        TAPP         0.84            kg/ha

Application  Efficiency:                  APPEFF    0.95            fraction

Spray Drift                   DRFT        0.16            fraction of application  rate applied to pond Application  Date         Date            15-6           dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm Interval  I      interval       14              days            Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

app. rate I   apprate                          kg/ha

Record 17:FILTRA IPSCND UPTKF

Record  18:PLVKRT PLDKRT FEXTRC   0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run                IR               Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.    RUNOFF   total            none, monthly or total( average of entire run)

KS Corn

stored as KSBEAIR.out

Chemical:  Bifenazate

PRZM environment: KSComStd.txt              modified Monday, 25 August 2008 at 15:45:08

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv  modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile:  wl3996.dvf   modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:52

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

 Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly 1961 14.62 13.52 10.84 8.065 7.254 3.125 1962 12.91 12.14 9.973 8.81 8.705 5.268 1963 16.06 14.95 11.59 9.18 8.064 5.066 1964 14.34 13.47 10.89 8.754 7.921 5.303 1965 17.26 16.35 14.41 10.47 9.471 6.118 1966 12.38 11.59 9.176 7.133 6.809 4.861 1967 23.87 22.19 20.02 14.41 12.14 6.557 1968 27.71 25.85 23.46 17.76 15.48 8.792 1969 17.21 16.47 14.06 11.37 9.891 7.277 1970 IO.?H 10.13 8.157 6.678 5.896 5.104 1971 9.99 9.542 8.464 6.646 5.726 4.084 1972 9.505 8.909 8.303 7.437 7.14 4.401 1973 29.47 27.28 20.96 15.06 13.82 7.638 1974 12.16 11.46 10.05 8.908 8.588 6.851 1975 10.88 10.23 8.159 6.622 5.916 4.919 1976 10.22 9.557 7.958 6.602 5.697 3.881 1977 22.3 20.72 18.17 13.58 12.95 6.743 1978 15.46 14.52 12.67 10.45 9.408 6.893 1979 17.9 16.94 15.37 12.18 11.21 6.934 1980 12.43 11.67 9.576 7.835 7.662 6.039 1981 21.25 19.83 16.23 13.6 12.24 7.227 1982 23.88 22.18 18.83 13.94 12.33 7.558 1983 15.11 14.16 11.24 8.577 7.361 5.7 1984 22.71 21.11 18.16 12.64 10.58 6.064 1985 17.57 16.82 14.07 11.06 10.5 6.729 1986 14.13 13.22 12.29 10.44 9.556 6.61 1987 11.97 11.24 10.36 8.357 8.047 5.55 1988 18.85 17.84 14.36 9.925 8.552 5.135 1989 16.48 15.66 13.05 10.71 10.9 6.474 1990 14.68 14.17 12.85 11.63 11.15 7.157

Sorted results

 Pro b.	Peak 	96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90Day Yearly 0.032258064516129   29.47 27.28 23.46 17.76 15.48 8.792 0.0645161290322581  27.71 25.85 20.96 15.06 13.82 7.638 0.0967741935483871 23.88 22.19 20.02 14.41 12.95 7.558 0.129032258064516   23.87 22.18 18.83 13.94 12.33 7.277 0.161290322580645   22.71 21.11 18.17 13.6 12.24 7.227 0.193548387096774  22.3 20.72 18.16 13.58 12.14 7.157 0.225806451612903   21.25 19.83 16.23 12.64 11.21 6.934

 0.258064516129032 18.85 17.84 15.37 12.18 11.15 6.893 0.290322580645161 17.9 16.94 14.41 11.63 10.9 6.851 0.32258064516129 17.57 16.82 14.36 11.37 10.58 6.743 0.354838709677419 17.26 16.47 14.07 11.06 10.5 6.729 0.387096774193548 17.21 16.35 14.06 10.71 9.891 6.61 0.419354838709677 16.48 15.66 13.05 10.47 9.556 6.557 0.451612903225806 16.06 14.95 12.85 10.45 9.471 6.474 0.483870967741936 15.46 14.52 12.67 10.44 9.408 6.118 0.516129032258065 15.11 14.17 12.29 9.925 8.705 6.064 0.548387096774194 14.68 14.16 11.59 9.18 8.588 6.039 0.580645161290323 14.62 13.52 11.24 8.908 8.552 5.7 0.612903225806452 14.34 13.47 10.89 8.81 8.064 5.55 0.645161290322581 14.13 13.22 10.84 8.754 8.047 5.303 0.67741935483871 12.91 12.14 10.36 8.577 7.921 5.268 0.709677419354839 12.43 11.67 10.05 8.357 7.662 5.135 0.741935483870968 12.38 11.59 9.973 8.065 7.361 5.104 0.774193548387097 12.16 11.46 9.576 7.835 7.254 5.066 0.806451612903226 11.97 11.24 9.176 7.437 7.14 4.919 0.838709677419355 10.88 10.23 8.464 7.133 6.809 4.861 0.870967741935484 10.78 10.13 8.303 6.678 5.916 4.401 0.903225806451613 10.22 9.557 8.159 6.646 5.896 4.084 0.935483870967742 9.99 9.542 8.157 6.622 5.726 3.881 0.967741935483871 9.505 8.909 7.958 6.602 5.697 3.125

 0.1 23.879 22.189 19.901 14.363 12.888 7.5299Average of yearly averages: 	6.00193333333333

Inputs generated  by pe5.pl- Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run: Output  File: KSBEAIR Metfile: 	wl3996.dvf

PRZM scenario: 	KSComStd.txt EXAMS environment file: 	ir298.exv Chemical  Name: 	Bifenazate

Description                   Variable  Name            Value         Units          Comments

Molecular weight        mwt            300.36        g/mol

Henry's Law Canst.     henry                             atm-m113/mol

Vapor Pressure             vapr            IE-7           torr

Solubility   sol              3.76            mg/L Kd              Kd                                 mg/L Koc            Koc            3011           mg/L

Photolysis  half-life      kdp                                days            Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism        kbacw        85.4            days           Halfife Anaerobic  Aquatic Metabolism    kbacs                             days            Halftfe Aerobic Soil Metabolism               asm            42.7            days           Halfife Hydrolysis:                   pH 7                              days           Half-life

Method:     CAM          2                 integer        See PRZM manual

Incorporation  Depth:   DEPI                             em

Application  Rate:        TAPP         0.84            kglha

Application  Efftciency:                  APPEFF    0.95            fraction

 Spray Drift DRFT 0.16 fraction of application  rate applied to pond Application  Date Date 15-6 dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm Interval  I      interval 14 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app. app. rate I   apprate kglha Record 17:FILTRAIPSCND

UPTKF Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT FEXTRC   0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run 	IR

Flag for runoff calc.    RUNOFF   total

Reservoir

none, monthly or total( average of entire run)

IL Beans

stored as ILBEAIR.out

Chemical:  Bifenazate

PRZM environment: ILbeansNMC.txt	modifted Thuday,  14 June 2007 at II: 16:26

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv  modified Tueday,  26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14842.dvf    modified Tueday,  26 August 2008 at 06:15:08

Water segment  concentrations (ppb)

 Year

1961Peak

17.7196 hr

16.4221 Day

12.4460 Day

11.1190 Day

10.24Yearly

4.512196217.7916.713.369.9948.9966.101196317.6616.5913.510.59.446.092196 418.117.0115.3611.4610.076.461196515.2614.3411.919.7459.8966.817196617.5 916.513.7310.629.7196.8196714.9314.1312.0610.249.3396.602196823.8722.832 0.9516.5914.328.19196929.6327.8125.4119.5116.9510.14197017.3116.4213.891 1.8211.489.048197124.623.1619.2714.7413.118.621197217.9516.9814.9613.161 1.968.249197320.3519.2916.9315.7914.068.912197431.629.6425.8918.9216.189 .882197520.0818.9815.613.4812.799.062197618.8917.7714.4111.9910.87.74519 7715.2314.6412.5910.419.8926.931197818.9217.8315.0812.410.946.971197916. 0815.212.6610.749.686.547198013.7712.9811.219.0388.8256.169198121.4720.2 218.8616.6815.148.374198232.9730.826.3820.4117.9710.69198319.5118.4215.1 112.0210.748.687198411.711.0510.478.9848.0326.204198515.8715.2113.029.99 38.9915.838198623.9722.5719.1814.4712.727.576198711.9711.319.2378.4258.0 46.347198810.449.7987.786.2745.4384.30219899.5358.9157.0246.0315.4213.56 199036.3733.8427.422.2719.259.047Sorted results

 Prob. 	Peak

0.03225806451612996 hr

36.3721 Day

33.8460 Day

27.490 Day

22.27Yearly

19.25

10.690.064516129032258132.9730.826.3820.4117.9710.140.096774193548387131 .629.6425.8919.5116.959.8820.12903225806451629.6327.8125.4118.9216.189.0 620.16129032258064524.623.1620.9516.6815.149.0480.19354838709677423.9722 .8319.2716.5914.329.0470.22580645161290323.8722.5719.1815.7914.068.9120. 25806451612903221.4720.2218.8614.7413.118.6870.29032258064516120.3519.29 16.9314.4712.798.6210.3225806451612920.0818.9815.613.4812.728.3740.35483 870967741919.5118.4215.3613.1611.968.2490.38709677419354818.9217.8315.11 12.411.488.190.41935483870967718.8917.7715.0812.0210.947.7450.4516129032 2580618.117.0114.9611.9910.87.5760.48387096774193617.9516.9814.4111.8210 .746.9710.51612903225806517.7916.713.8911.4610.246.9310.5483870967741941 7.7116.5913.7311.1110.076.81758064516129032317.6616.513.510.749.8966.80. 61290322580645217.5916.4213.3610.629.8926.6020.64516129032258117.3116.42 13.0210.59.7196.5470.6774193548387116.0815.2112.6610.419.686.4610.709677 41935483915.8715.212.5910.249.446.3470.74193548387096815.2614.6412449.99 49.3396.2040.77419354838709715.2314.3412.069.9938.9966.1690.806451612903 22614.9314.1311.919.7458.9916.1010.83870967741935513.7712.9811.219.0388. 8256.0920.87096774193548411.9711.3110.478.9848.045.8380.9032258064516131 1.711.059.2378.4258.0324.5120.93548387096774210.449.7987.786.2745.4384.3 020.9677419354838719.5358.9157.0246.0315.4213.560.131.40329.45725.84219. 45116.8739.8Average of yearly averages: 	7.34923333333333

Inputs generated  by pe5.pl- Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run: Output File: ILBEAIR Metfile:      w 14842.dvf

PRZM scenario:           ILbeansNMC.txt

EXAMS environment tile:            ir298.exv

Chemical  Name: Description Molecular weight Henry's Law Cons!.

Bifenazate Variable Name mwt 	300.36 henry

Value 	Units g/mol

atm-m113/mol

Comments

Vapor Pressure Solubility   sol Kd	Kd

vapr

3.76

IE-7

mg/L

mg/L

torr

Koc	Koc	3011

Photolysis half-life 	kdp Aerobic  Aquatic Metabolism Anaerobic  Aquatic Metabolism Aerobic Soil Metabolism Hydrolysis: 	pH 7

Method:     CAM 	2

Incorporation  Depth:   DEPI

mg/L

kbacw kbacs asm

integer

days 	Half-life

85.4 	days 	Halfife days 	Halfife

42.7 	days 	Halfife days 	Half-life

See PRZM manual

em

Application  Rate: 	TAPP Application  Efficiency:

Spray Drift 	 DRFT Application  Date 	 Date Interval  I      interval 	 14 app. rate I   apprate

Record 17:FILTRA

IPSCND UPTKF

Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT FEXTRC   0.5

0.84 	kg/ha

APPEFF    0.95 	fraction

0.16 	fraction of application  rate applied to pond

15-6 	dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm days 	Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

kg/ha

Flag for Index Res. Run 	IR

Flag for runoff calc.    RUNOFF  total

GROUND   APPLICATIONS

Reservoir

none, monthly or total( average of entire run)

MS Soybeans

stored as MSBEGD.out

Chemical:  Bifenazate

PRZM environment: MSsoybeanSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 13:58:06

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv  modified Tueday,  26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w03940.dvf    modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:14

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

 Year

1961Peak

11.9796 hr

II21 Day

8.92360 Day

7.40390Day

6.194Yearly

2.38919624.2163.9383.1282.7652.5111.999196320.718.9213.638.5266.9553.123 19647.7917.2896.0354.924.3143.13196512.1311.158.2965.4864.5452.80919669. 1358.5556.4854.5323.9512.58519676.8356.3465.4914.1553.7852.30319683.9013 .6272.8052.3152.2241.64919694.9044.5423.4662.8142.6771.55719704.7994.504 3.9783.3613.0581.86319716.8996.3735.25640423.8532.36219724.243.9493.1352 .6912.3951.83219733.6323.3572.5311.9741.7621.33919743.5713.3032.7542.487 2.2551.55919752119.8516.9611.359.4954.471197613.7212.689.6546.9026.2944. 12719777.6097.0695.6934.7794.2472.99419785.2614.8943.8533.212.822.161197 934.6432.0124.3116.9814.165.98119806.6026.2325.4755.164.9143.747198133.4 331.1322.3713.6911.154.975198218.0616.814.0912.6711.326.177

 1983 6.64 6.247 5.342 4.95 4.687 3.84 1984 6.711 6.253 5.033 4.678 4.326 2.97 1985 10.97 10.11 7.561 5.129 4.727 2.926 1986 6.603 6.124 4.723 4.107 3.586 2.456 1987 11.8 10.89 9.248 6.36 5.383 2.808 1988 4.63 4.319 3.42 3.012 2.875 2.227 1989 9.107 8.381 6.387 4.361 3.705 2.341 1990 4.236 3.964 3.125 2.468 2.131 1.776Sorted results

 Prob. 	Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly 0.032258064516129 34.64 32.01 24.31 16.98 14.16 6.177 0.0645161290322581 33.43 31.13 22.37 13.69 I 1.32 5.981 0.0967741935483871 21 19.85 16.96 12.67 11.15 4.975 0.129032258064516 20.7 18.92 14.09 11.35 9.495 4.471 0.161290322580645 18.06 16.8 13.63 8.526 6.955 4.127 0.193548387096774 13.72 12.68 9.654 7.403 6.294 3.84 0.225806451612903 12.13 11.15 9.248 6.902 6.194 3.747 0.258064516129032 11.97 II 8.923 6.36 5.383 3.13 0.290322580645161 11.8 10.89 8.296 5.486 4.914 3.123 0.32258064516129 10.97 10.11 7.561 5.16 4.727 2.994 0.354838709677419 9.135 8.555 6.485 5.129 4.687 2.97 0.387096774193548 9.107 8.381 6.387 4.95 4.545 2.926 0.419354838709677 7.791 7.289 6.035 4.92 4.326 2.809 0.451612903225806 7.609 7.069 5.693 4.779 4.314 2.808 0.483870967741936 6.899 6.373 5.491 4.678 4.247 2.585 0.516129032258065 6.835 6.346 5.475 4.532 3.951 2.456 0.548387096774194 6.711 6.253 5.342 4.361 3.853 2.389 0.580645161290323 6.64 6.247 5.256 4.155 3.785 2.362 0.612903225806452 6.603 6.232 5.033 4.107 3.705 2.341 0.645161290322581 6.602 6.124 4.723 4.042 3.586 2.303 0.67741935483871 5.261 4.894 3.978 3.361 3.058 2.227 0.709677419354839 4.904 4.542 3.853 3.21 2.875 2.161 0.741935483870968 4.799 4.504 3.466 3.012 2.82 1.999 0.774193548387097 4.63 4.319 3.42 2.814 2.677 1.863 0.806451612903226 4.24 3.964 3.135 2.765 2.511 1.832 0.838709677419355 4.236 3.949 3.128 2.691 2.395 1.776 0.870967741935484 4.216 3.938 3.125 2.487 2.255 1.649 0.903225806451613 3.901 3.627 2.805 2.468 2.224 1.559 0.935483870967742 3.632 3.357 2.754 2.315 2.131 1.557 0.967741935483871 3.571 3.303 2.531 1.974 1.762 1.339

 0.1 20.97 19.757 16.673 12.538 10.9845 4.9246Average of yearly averages: 	2.88253333333333

Inputs generated  by pe5.pl- Novemeber  2006

Data used for this run: Output File: MSBEGD Metftle:      w03940.dvf

PRZM scenario: 	MSsoybeanSTD.txt EXAMS environment file: 	ir298.exv Chemical  Name: 	 Bifenazate

Description                   Variable  Name            Value         Units          Comments

Molecular  weight        mwt            300.36        g/mol

Henry's Law Const.     henry                             atm-m"3/mol

Vapor Pressure             vapr            IE-7           torr

Solubility   sol              3.76            mg/L Kd	Kd                                 mg/L Koc	Koc            3011           mg/L

Photolysis  half-life      kdp                                days           Half-life

Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism        kbacw        85.4            days           Hal fife Anaerobic  Aquatic Metabolism    kbacs                             days           Halfife Aerobic Soil Metabolism               asm            42.7            days           Halfife Hydrolysis:                   pH 7                              days           Half-life

Method:     CAM          2                integer        See PRZM manual

Incorporation  Depth:   DEPI                             em

Application  Rate:        TAPP         0.84            kg/ha

Application  Efficiency:                  APPEFF    0.99            fraction

Spray Drift                   DRFT        0.064          fraction of application  rate applied  to pond

 Application  Date Date 15-6 dd/mm  or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm Interval  I     interval 14 days Set to 0 or delete line for single app. app. rate I   apprate kg/ha Record  17: FILTRAIPSCND

UJYTKF Record  18:PLYKRT

PLDKRT FEXTRC   0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run 	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.    RUNOFF   total 	none. monthly or total( average of entire run)

Ml Beans

stored as MIBEGD.out

Chemical:  Bifenazate

PRZM environment: MlbeansSTD.txt	modified Tueday, 29 May 2007 at 13:56:44

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv  modified Tueday. 26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile:  wl4826.dvf  modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:04

Water segment  concentrations (ppb)

 Year Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly 1961 5.255 4.947 4.364 3.436 3.041 1.345 1962 4.889 4.63 3.808 3.416 3.075 2.156 1963 4.437 4.204 3.509 2.95 2.814 2.066 1964 9.36 8.867 7.303 6.392 5.763 3.27 1965 6.27 6 5.152 4.38 4.297 3.471 1966 5.243 5.006 4.383 3.757 3.506 2.88 1967 6.991 6.618 5.916 4.848 4.457 3.029 1968 11.59 11.01 9.182 7.31 7.245 4.473 1969 12.81 12.14 10.69 8.558 7.62 5.313 1970 11.64 11.07 9.294 7.704 7.18 5.372 1971 9.081 8.7 7.618 6.634 6.103 4.867 1972 11.52 10.92 9.059 7.276 6.742 4.916 1973 6.584 6.325 5.481 4.8 4.463 4.141 1974 5.742 5.541 4.903 4.246 3.927 3.257 1975 11.61 10.97 10.05 7.986 7.098 4.303 1976 13.96 13.28 10.88 8.284 7.378 5.264 1977 8.572 8.325 7.104 6.001 5.508 4.559 1978 5.773 5.535 4.759 4.236 3.948 3.51 1979 11.57 11.15 9.52 7.349 6.464 4.004 1980 11.95 11.29 9.473 7.878 7.231 4.872 1981 7.927 7.578 6.759 6.032 5.909 4.904 1982 6.755 6.487 5.845 5.372 5.077 4.24 1983 10.98 10.37 8.429 6.87 6.245 4.352 1984 6.396 6.149 5.618 5.158 4.897 4.009 1985 8.503 8.11 7.048 5.973 5.479 3.952 1986 8.141 7.866 7.351 6.719 6.258 4.569 1987 6.47 6.303 5.78 5.209 5.054 4.362 1988 5.734 5.491 5.043 4.926 4.677 3.896 1989 6.967 6.702 5.787 5.551 5.512 4.077 1990 5.775 5.535 4.772 4.221 4.039 3.591

Sorted  resu Its

 Prob. 	Peak 96 hr 21 Day 60 Day 90 Day Yearly 0.032258064516129 13.96 13.28 10.88 8.558 7.62 5.372 0.0645161290322581 12.81 12.14 10.69 8.284 7.378 5.313 0.0967741935483871 11.95 11.29 10.05 7.986 7.245 5.264 0.129032258064516 11.64 11.15 9.52 7.878 7.231 4.916 0.161290322580645 11.61 11.07 9.473 7.704 7.18 4.904 0.193548387096774 11.59 11.01 9.294 7.349 7.098 4.872 0.225806451612903 11.57 10.97 9.182 7.31 6.742 4.867 0.258064516129032 11.52 10.92 9.059 7.276 6.464 4.569 0.290322580645161 10.98 10.37 8.429 6.87 6.258 4.559 0.32258064516129 9.36 8.867 7.618 6.719 6.245 4.473 0.354838709677419 9.081 8.7 7.351 6.634 6.103 4.362 0.387096774193548 8.572 8.325 7.303 6.392 5.909 4.352 0.419354838709677 8.503 8.11 7.104 6.032 5.763 4.303 0.451612903225806 8.141 7.866 7.048 6.001 5.512 4.24 0.483870967741936 7.927 7.578 6.759 5.973 5.508 4.141 0.516129032258065 6.991 6.702 5.916 5.551 5.479 4.077

 0.548387096774194 6.967 6.618 5.845 5.372 5.077 4.009 0.580645161290323 6.755 6.487 5.787 5.209 5.054 4.004 0.612903225806452 6.584 6.325 5.78 5.158 4.897 3.952 0.645161290322581 6.47 6.303 5.618 4.926 4.677 3.896 0.67741935483871 6.396 6.149 5.481 4.848 4.463 3.591 0.709677419354839 6.27 6 5.152 4.8 4.457 3.51 0.741935483870968 5.775 5.541 5.043 4.38 4.297 3.471 0.774193548387097 5.773 5.535 4.903 4.246 4.039 3.27 0.806451612903226 5.742 5.535 4.772 4.236 3.948 3.257 0.838709677419355 5.734 5.491 4.759 4.221 3.927 3.029 0.870967741935484 5.255 5.006 4.383 3.757 3.506 2.88 0.903225806451613 5.243 4.947 4.364 3.436 3.075 2.156 0.935483870967742 4.889 4.63 3.808 3.416 3.041 2.066 0.967741935483871 4.437 4.204 3.509 2.95 2.814 1.345

 0.1 11.919 11.276 9.997 7.9752 7.2436 5.2292Average of yearly averages: 	3.96733333333333

Inputs generated  by pe5. pi - Novemeber 2006

Data used for this run: Output  File: MIBEGD Metfile:      wl4826.dvf

PRZM scenario:           MlbeansSTD.txt

EXAMS environment file:            ir298.exv

Chemical  Name: Description Molecular weight Henry's Law Const.

Bifenazate Variable Name mwt 	300.36 henry

Value 	Units g/mol

atm-m"3/mol

Comments

Vapor Pressure Solubility   sol Kd	Kd

vapr

3.76

IE-7

mg/L

mg/L

torr

Koc	Koc	3011

Photolysis half-life 	kdp Aerobic Aquatic Metabolism Anaerobic  Aquatic Metabolism Aerobic Soil Metabolism Hydrolysis: 	pH 7

Method:     CAM 	2

Incorporation Depth: DEPI Application Rate:       TAPP Application  Efficiency:

Spray Drift 	DRFT Application  Date 	Date Interval  I     interval 	 14 app. rate I  apprate

Record  17:FILTRA

IPSCND UPTKF

Record  18:PLVKRT PLDKRT FEXTRC   0.5

mg/L

kbacw kbacs asm

integer

0.84

APPEFF

0.064

15-6 days kglha

days           Half-life

85.4 	days 	Halfife days 	Halfife

42.7 	days 	Halfife days 	Half-life

See PRZM manual

em kg/ha

0.99            fraction

fraction  of application  rate applied to pond dd/mm or dd/mrnm or dd-mm or dd-mrnm Set to 0 or delete line for single app.

Flag for Index Res. Run 	IR Flag for runoff calc.    RUNOFF   total

Reservoir

none, monthly or total( average of entire run)

KS Corn

stored as KSBEGD.out

Chemical:  Bifenazate

PRZM environment: KSComStd.txt	modified  Monday, 25 August 2008 at 15:45:08

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv  modified Tueday,  26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w 13996.dvf    modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:14:52

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

 Year

1961Peak

13.4996 hr

12.4521 Day

9.76660 Day

6.98290 Day

6.291Yearly

2.604196212.2511.479.2887.8177.2834.471196313.5412.599.726.9956.2024.152 196413.712.8210.197.9847.0024.354196513.5812.711.38.3337.8155.16219667.5 127.0955.8954.8794.823.849

 1967 21.12 20.12 17.25 12.33 10.39 5.589 1968 26.96 25.09 22.74 16.81 14.61 7.913 1969 12.54 12.12 10.98 9.016 7.975 6.334 1970 9.27 8.905 7.401 5.695 5.095 4.083 1971 6.156 5.835 5.072 4.11 3.643 3.023 1972 7.715 7.304 6.118 5.564 5.44 3.344 1973 28.11 25.96 19.74 13.71 12.94 6.719 1974 8.649 8.228 7.253 6.904 6.746 5.909 1975 6.27 5.988 5.153 4.376 4.234 3.895 1976 5.637 5.475 4.564 4.079 3.631 2.817 1977 20.3 18.85 15.38 11.48 11.29 5.81 1978 ]IJ 10.78 9.636 8.225 7.51 5.962 1979 14.21 13.53 12.38 10.21 9.627 5.993 1980 11.32 10.59 8.577 6.857 6.684 5.103 !981 20.03 18.66 15.09 11.72 10.63 6.331 1982 19.86 18.46 16.11 12.08 10.65 6.645 1983 10.35 9.758 8.02 6.161 5.399 4.727 1984 18.29 17.16 15.32 10.52 8.865 5.101 1985 16.51 15.75 13.09 10.18 9.655 5.784 1986 11.23 10 7 9.225 8.464 7.846 5.668 1987 8.624 8.138 7.081 6.272 6.198 4.567 1988 14.5 13.64 11.24 7.901 6.7 4.135 1989 15.93 15.08 12.39 9.827 9.641 5.512 !990 13.8 13.29 11.82 10.08 9.314 6.228

Sorted results

 Prob. 	Peak

0.03225806451612996 hr

28.1121 Day

25.9660Day

22.7490 Day

16.81Yearly

14.61

7.9130.064516129032258126.9625.0919.7413.7112.946.7190.09677419354838712 1.1220.1217.2512.3311.296.6450.12903225806451620.318.8516.1112.0810.656. 3340.16129032258064520.0318.6615.3811.7210.636.3310.19354838709677419.86 18.4615.3211.4810.396.2280.22580645161290318.2917.1615,0910.529.6555.993 0.25806451612903216.5115.7513.0910.219.6415.9620.29032258064516115.9315. 0812.3910.189.6275.9090.3225806451612914.513.6412.3810.089.3145.810.3548 3870967741914.2113.5311.829.8278.8655.7840.38709677419354813.813.2911.39 .0167.9755.6680.41935483870967713.712.8211.248.4647.8465.5890.4516129032 2580613.5812.710.988.3337.8155.5120.48387096774193613.5412.5910.198.2257 .515.1620.51612903225806513.4912.459.7667.9847.2835.1030.548387096774194 12.5412.129.727.9017.0025.1010.58064516129032312.2511.479.6367.8176.7464 .7270.61290322580645211.3210.789.2886.9956.74.5670.64516129032258111.310 .79.2256.9826.6844.4710.6774193548387111.2310.598.5776.9046.2914.3540.70 967741935483910.359.7588.026.8576.2024.1520.7419354838709689.278.9057.40 16.2726.1984.1350.7741935483870978.6498.2287.2536.1615.444.0830.80645161 29032268.6248.1387.0815.6955.3993.8950.8387096774193557.7157.3046.1185.5 645.0953.8490.8709677419354847.5127.0955.8954.8794.823.344Q9032258064516 136.275.9885.1534.3764.2343.0230.9354838709677426.1565.8355.0724.113.643 2.8170.9677419354838715.6375.4754.5644.0793.6312.6040.1 	21.038 	19.993  17.136 	12.30511.226 	6.6139

Average of yearly averages:

5.05946666666667Inputs generated  by pe5.pl- Novemeber 2006Data used for this run: Output File: KSBEGD Metfile:      w13996.dvf

PRZM scenario: 	KSComStd.txt EXAMS environment file: 	ir298.exv Chemical  Name: 	Bifenazatc

Description 	Variable  Name 	Value

Units 	Comments

 Molecular weight Henry's Law Cons!. Vapor Pressure Solubility   sol

Kd	Kd Koc	Koc Photolysis half-lifemwt henry vapr

3.76

3011 kdp300.36

IE-7 mg/L mg/L mg/Lg/mol

atm-m"3/mol torr

days 	Half-lifeAerobic Aquatic Metabolismkbacw85.4daysHalfifeAnaerobic  Aquatic Metabolism

Aerobic Soil Metabolismkbacs

asm

42.7days

daysHalfife

HalfifeHydrolysis: 	pH 7daysHalf-lifeMethod:     CAM

Incorporation  Depth:2

DEPIintegerSee PRZM manual

emApplication  Rate:TAPP0.84kg/haApplication  Efficiency: 	APPEFF    0.99 	fractionSpray Drift

Application  Date Interval  I      interval app. rate I  apprate Record 17:FILTRADRFT

Date

140.064

15-6 days kg/hafraction of application  rate applied to pond

dd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Set to 0 or delete line for single app.IPSCND

UPTKF Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT FEXTRC   0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run 	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.    RUNOFF   total 	none, monthly or total( average of entire run)

IL Beans

stored as ILBEGD.out

Chemical:  Bifenazate

PRZM environment: ILbeansNMC.txt	modified Thuday,  14 June 2007 at II: 16:26

EXAMS environment: ir298.exv  modified Tueday,  26 August 2008 at 06:14:08

Metfile: w14842.dvf    modified Tueday, 26 August 2008 at 06:15:08

Water segment concentrations (ppb)

 Year

1961Peak

14.996 hr

1421 Day

11.3160 Day

9.59990 Day

9.08Yearly

4.032196213.8913.110.648.0577.2925.294196315.1614.2411.638.8847.8755.138 19641514.4112.49.1328.1525.474196511.0510.439.4698.4538.2685.81196616.16 15.1212.59.5658.6875.785196713.212.4610.518.4117.6635.558196820.6119.418 .0514.6412.717.214196926.9225.2822.7317.8115.539.242197015.9515.112.6210 .8410.558.109197121.9820.6917.2513.2911.747.671197213.5812.9111.910.9110 .137.277197318.5617.5914.9713.6412.327.975197429.9828.1123.2316.9814.598 .985197518.4117.3814.2312.1711.018.127197614.2113.4411.189.9088.9656.756 197714.0913.5411.529.1418.4735.916197815.9215.0212.2610.028.995.95619791 4.3413.5411.068.9147.8925.50419809.5329.0438.0876.8456.8155.127198119.82 18.717.4914.7613.527.432198229.4527.542418.8916.649.839198314.8814.1411. 979.7198.8867.77619848.2027.8567.4046.4865.9875.184198511.4910.969.7487. 8077.0654.783198621.3520.1216.9612.6211.226.59819878.5578.227.1316.2556. 0225.33319885.4565.194.3353.9783.8313.21919894.6674.4273.743.4013.2612.4 23199032.4330.1924.6920.6217.98.119Sorted results

 Prob. 	Peak

0.03225806451612996 hr

32.4321  Day

30.1960Day

24.6990 Day

20.62Yearly

17.9

9.8390.064516129032258129.9828.112418.8916.649.2420.096774193548387129.4 527.5423.2317.8115.538.9850.12903225806451626.9225.2822.7316.9814.598.12 70.16129032258064521.9820.6918.0514.7613.528.1190.19354838709677421.3520 .1217.4914.6412.718.1090.22580645161290320.6119.417.2513.6412.327.9750.2 5806451612903219.8218.716.9613.2911.747.7760.29032258064516118.5617.5914 .9712.6211.227.671Q3225806451612918.4117.3814.2312.1711.0 I7.4320.35483870967741916.1615.1212.6210.9110.557.2770.38709677419354815 .9515.112.510.8410.137.2140.41935483870967715.9215.0212.4<IP_ADDRESS>60 .45161290322580615.1614.4112.269.9088.996.5980.4838709677419361514.2411. 979.7198.9655.9560.51612903225806514.914.1411.99.5998.8865.9160.54838709 677419414.881411.639.5658.6875.810.58064516129032314.3413.5411.529.1418. 4735.7850.61290322580645214.2113.5411.319.1328.2685.5580.645161290322581 14.0913.4411.188.9148.1525.5040.6774193548387113.89<IP_ADDRESS>47.8925. 4740.70967741935483913.5812.9110.648.4537.8755.3330.74193548387096813.21 2.4610.518.4117.6635.2940.77419354838709711.4910.969.7488.0577.2925.1840 .80645161290322611.0510.439.4697.8077.0655.1380.8387096774193559.5329.04 38.0876.8456.8155.1270.8709677419354848.5578.227.4046.4866.0224.7830.903 2258064516138.2027.8567.1316.2555.9874.0320.9354838709677425.4565.194.33 53.9783.8313.2190.9677419354838714.6674.4273.743.4013.2612.4230.1  29.197 	27.314 	23.18 	17.72715.436 	8.8992

Average of yearly averages:

6.38853333333333Inputs generated  by pe5.pl- Novemeber 2006Data used for this run:Output  File: ILBEGDMetfile: 	wl4842.dvf

PRZM scenario: 	!LbeansNMC.txt EXAMS environment file: 	ir298.exv Chemical  Name: 	Bifenazate

Description 	Variable Name 	Value

Units 	Comments

Method:     CAM 	2	integer 	See PRZM manual

Incorporation  Depth:  DEPI 	em

Application  Rate: 	TAPP 	0.84 	kg/ha

Application  Efficiency: 	APPEFF    0.99 	fraction

 Spray Drift DRFT 0.064 fraction of application  rate applied to pond Application  Date

Interval l   intervalDate

14!5-6

daysdd/mm or dd/mmm or dd-mm or dd-mmm

Set to 0 or delete line for single app.app. rate I  appratekg/haRecord 17: FILTRAIPSCND

UPTKF Record 18:PLVKRT

PLDKRT FEXTRC   0.5

Flag for Index Res. Run 	IR	Reservoir

Flag for runoff calc.    RUNOFF   total 	none, monthly or total( average of entire run)


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 241 (Thursday, December 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78794-78795]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31627]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63520; File No. SR-EDGX-2010-21]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Amendments to the EDGX Exchange, Inc. Fee Schedule

December 10, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 3, 2010, the EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or the
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its fee schedule applicable to
Members \3\ and non-members of the Exchange pursuant to EDGX Rule
15.1(a) and (c). Pursuant to the proposed rule change, the Exchange
will commence charging fees for Members and non-members for certain
logical ports used to enter orders into the Exchange's systems. The
Exchange also proposes to amend its fees for physical ports. The text
of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Internet Web
site at http://www.directedge.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ A Member is any registered broker or dealer, or any person
associated with a registered broker or dealer, that has been
admitted to membership in the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to begin charging a
monthly fee for logical ports used to enter orders in the Exchange's
trading system. The Exchange recently began charging for ``physical''
ports, which are ports that are used by a Member or non-member to
literally plug into the Exchange at the data centers where the
Exchange's servers are located (i.e., either a cross-connection or an
external telecommunication circuit). By contrast, a ``logical'' port
(also commonly referred to as a TCP/IP port) represents a port
established by the Exchange within the Exchange's system for trading
and billing purposes. Each logical port established is specific to a
Member or non-member and grants that Member or non-member the ability
to operate a specific application, such as FIX or High Performance API
for order entry, or to receive market data. Multiple logical ports can
be created and exist over a single physical port. The Exchange proposes
to charge $500 per month for any logical ports other than ports used to
receive or request retransmission of market data. Thus, this proposed
charge will apply to all Exchange FIX, High Performance API, and DROP
ports for both accessing the Exchange directly (Direct) \4\ or through
the ECN Translator.\5\ Members and non-members will receive the first
ten (10) sessions free of charge for Direct Sessions only and
thereafter be charged the $500 fee per month. Free sessions will not
apply to ECN Translator sessions to incent members and non-members to
use Direct Sessions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Direct Sessions will consist on one port at the Exchange's
primary data center and one port at the Exchange's secondary data
center.
    \5\ The ECN translator allows a Member or non-member who
previously connected to Direct Edge's ECN to be re-directed
automatically to EDGX Exchange, Inc. It can only be accessed through
a FIX port.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on the proposal, the change applies to Members that obtain
ports for direct access to the Exchange and non-member service bureaus
that act as conduit for orders entered by Exchange Members that are
their customers. The Exchange believes that the imposition of logical
port fees will help the Exchange to continue to maintain and improve
its infrastructure, while also encouraging Exchange customers to
request and enable only the ports that are necessary for their
operations related to the Exchange.
    The Exchange notes that other market centers provide similar
services to their Members and non-members.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See, e.g., Rule 7015 of The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
(``NASDAQ'') (setting forth, among other fees for access services,
port fees charged to members and non-members used to enter orders
into NASDAQ trading systems). See also Securities Exchange Act
Release Nos. 60546 (August 20, 2009), 74 FR 43184 (August 26, 2009)
(SR-NASDAQ-2009-058) (increasing the monthly fee for each port used
to enter orders in NASDAQ trading systems from $400 per month to
$500 per month); 59337 (February 2, 2009), 74 FR 6441 (February 9,
2009) (SR-BX-2009-004) (establishing fees for ports used by members
to enter orders). See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60586
(August 28, 2009), 74 FR 46256 (September 8, 2009) (SR-BATS-2009-
026) (establishing fees for ports used by members and non-members to
enter orders).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Physical Ports
    The Exchange currently charges Members and non-members the
following annual fees for physical ports based on the connectivity
service type:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Annual fee per
                 Connection service type                   physical port
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Gb Copper.............................................          $5,000
1 Gb Fiber..............................................           7,500
10 Gb Fiber.............................................          10,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Beginning January 1, 2011, the Exchange proposes to amend these
physical port fees to offer Members and non-members the option of being
charged month to month. The fees will be 20% higher on a monthly basis
to offset increased administrative costs associated with processing
monthly payments. The proposed monthly fees based on connectivity
service type are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Annual fee per
                 Connection service type                   physical port
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 Gb Copper.............................................            $500
1 Gb Fiber..............................................             750
10 Gb Fiber.............................................           1,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will implement the proposed rule change on January 1,
2011.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\8\ in particular, as it is designed to
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among its Members and other persons using its facilities. The
Exchange believes that its proposed logical and physical port fees are
reasonable in light of the benefits to members and non-members. In
addition, the Exchange believes that its fees are equitably allocated
among its constituents based upon the number of access ports that they
require to submit orders to the Exchange. Furthermore, the fees
associated with logical and physical ports will be equitably allocated
to all constituents as the fees will be uniform in application to all
Members and non-members. Finally, the Exchange believes that the fees
obtained will enable it to cover its infrastructure costs associated
with allowing Members and non-members to establish logical and physical
ports to connect to the Exchange's systems and continue to maintain and
improve its infrastructure, market technology, and services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \10\ thereunder. At any
time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-EDGX-2010-21 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EDGX-2010-21. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing will also be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-EDGX-2010-21 and should be
submitted on or before January 6, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-31627 Filed 12-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: July 31, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 146)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 38161]
[DOCID:fr31jy09-22]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2009-0214; FRL-8939-3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Texas; Control of Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides (NOX)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Texas State
Implementation Plan (SIP) that amend 30 TAC Chapter 117, Control of Air
Pollution from Nitrogen Compounds. On March 10, 2009, the State of
Texas submitted a SIP revision containing amendments to the Beaumont-
Port Arthur (BPA) 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Major Source rules,
the Houston-Galveston-Brazoria (HGB) 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
Major Source rules, and the HGB 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Minor
Source rules. These revisions will result in additional flexibility and
consistency in the current stationary reciprocating internal combustion
engine and gas turbine monitoring specifications found in Chapter 117
by allowing for an output-based option for monitoring nitrogen oxides
(NOX) emissions. This additional option is expected to be
equally effective as totalizing fuel flow meters in the monitoring of
NOX emissions at major stationary sources in the BPA 8-hour
ozone nonattainment area and at both major and minor sources in the HGB
8-hour ozone nonattainment area. The EPA is proposing to approve these
revisions pursuant to section 110 of the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before August 31, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be mailed to Mr. Guy Donaldson, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733. Comments may also be
submitted electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following
the detailed instructions in the Addresses section of the direct final
rule located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dayana Medina, Air Planning Section
(6PD-L), Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, U.S. EPA, Region
6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-
7241; fax number<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal
Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct final
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this
action, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse
comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public
comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on
this proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period. Any
parties interested in commenting on this action should do so at this
time. Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule, which is
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: July 21, 2009.
Carl E. Edlund,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. E9-18343 Filed 7-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P