[Federal Register: December 14, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 238)]
[Notices]
[Page 66120-66122]
[DOCID:fr14de09-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

December 4, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC10-28-000.
    Applicants: La Paloma Generating Company, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization for Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities and Request for Expedited Action of La Poloma
Generating Company, LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091203-5086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 24, 2009.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER01-462-002.
    Applicants: DPL Energy Resources, Inc.
    Description: DPL Energy Resources, Inc submits Substitute First
Revised Sheet 1 to its FERC Electric Rate Schedule 1, to be effective
12/27/09.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091203-0010.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-412-009.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C. status of stakeholder.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091201-5165.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1192-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits revisions to its
Bylaws to comply with FERC's 9/17/09 Orders.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0151.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1269-002; ER09-1270-002.
    Applicants: Escondido Energy Center, LLC, Chula Vista Energy
Center, LLC.
    Description: Supplemental Information Requested Informally by
Commission Staff of Escondido Energy Center, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091130-5149.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-90-001.
    Applicants: Lonestar Energy Partners, LLC.
    Description: Lonestar Energy Partners, LLC submits the Amended
Petition for Acceptance of Initial Rate Schedule, Waivers and Blanket
Authority.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0173.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-92-002.
    Applicants: EDF Trading North America, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of EDF Trading
North America, LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-5132.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-228-001.
    Applicants: Star Point Wind Project LLC.
    Description: Star Point Wind Project, LLC submits Substitute
Original Sheet 1 et al. to FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0161.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-230-000.
    Applicants: Kansas City Power & Light Company, KCP&L Greater
Missouri Operations Company.
    Description: Kansas City Power & Light Company et al. submits
revised tariff sheets for the GMO open access transmission tariff
revised tariff sheets for Schedule 1 etc.
    Filed Date: 11/10/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091112-0090.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, December 10, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-238-001.
    Applicants: Upper Peninsula Power Company.
    Description: Upper Peninsula Power Company submits filing as a
supplement to its 11/9/09 filing of revisions to Attachments D and E of
Original Rate Schedule 54 etc.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0160.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-249-001.
    Applicants: Illinois Power Company & Ameren Illinois.
    Description: Illinois Power Co and Ameren Illinois Transmission Co
submit revised Exhibit A to the Joint Ownership Agreement.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0152.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, December 11, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-328-001.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: National Grid submits errata to amendment of Formula
Transmission Rate Supported by Stipulation.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0085.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-343-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits executed
interconnection service agreement among PJM, Worcester County Renewable
Energy, LLC, and Delmarva Power and Light Company.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-345-000.
    Applicants: Calpine Construction Finance Company, LP.
    Description: Calpine Construction Finance Company, LP submits
notice of cancellation to Rate Schedule FERC No 3.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0100.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-346-000.
    Applicants: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant LLC.
    Description: Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC submits a
Notice of Succession and name change.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-347-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits revised tariff sheets to Appendices
A, B, and C of PacifiCorp Rate Schedule FERC 590 etc.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.

    Accession Number: 20091202-0098.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-348-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits for filing informational purposes a
revised Exhibit C and revised Exhibit D to its Second Revised Rate
Schedule 237.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0097.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-349-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc et al. submit notice of
cancellation to First Revised Rate Schedule FERC No 171.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-350-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits Notice of Cancellation to
First revised Rate Schedule 174 the Electric Power Supply Agreement,
dated 2/1/88.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0095.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-351-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc et al. submit notice of
cancellation to First Revised Rate Schedule FERC No 170.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0094.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-352-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits amendments to its
Open Access Transmission Tariff to include a pro forma Interim Large
Generator Interconnection Agreement.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0049.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-353-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits an executed service
agreement for Network Integration Transmission Service.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0048.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-355-000.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corporation.
    Description: AEP Transmission Company, LLC et al. submits request
for acceptance of a formula rate to recover the costs of investments in
transmission facilities.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-356-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc et al. submits notice of
cancellation to First Revised Rate Schedule FERC No 175.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0091.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-357-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits Notice of Cancellation to
First revised Rate Schedule 245 the Electric Power Supply Agreement,
dated 11/2/87.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0090.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-358-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits notice of cancellation to
First Revised Rate Schedule FERC No 169.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0089.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-359-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits Notice of Cancellation to
First revised Rate Schedule 179 the Electric Power Supply Agreement,
dated 12/8/87.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0088.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-360-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits Notice of Cancellation to
First Revised Rate Schedule FERC 172 etc.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0084.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-361-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits Notice of Cancellation to
First revised Rate Schedule 173 the Electric Power Supply Agreement,
dated 9/14/87.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0086.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-362-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc submits notice of cancellation to
First Revised Rate Schedule FERC No 233.
    Filed Date: 11/30/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0087.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 21, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-364-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits an executed Designee
Qualification and Novation Agreement.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0153.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-365-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits an executed Designee
Qualification and Novation Agreement.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0154.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-366-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits revisions to the PJM
Open Access Transmission Tariff and Reliability Assurance Agreement.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0155.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-367-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits amendments to
Section 9.7.1 of it Bylaws.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0156.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-368-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits an executed Meter
Agent Services Agreement between Westar Energy, Inc Generation Services
etc.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0157.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-369-000.
    Applicants: Ameren Services Company.
    Description: Ameren Services Co submits Facilities Service
Agreement

between Ameren Services and Ameren Energy Generating Company.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-370-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits notice cancellation
of the Meter Agent Services Agreement between Kansas Electric Power
Cooperative and the Empire District Electric Company.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0159.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-371-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Florida Power and Light Company submits transmittal
letter and new Service Agreement 272 and 273 for Long-Term Point-to-
Point Transmission Service with Georgia Transmission Corp.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0162.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-372-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits an executed
interconnection service agreement entered into among PJM et al.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-0163.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-373-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Florida Power and Light Company submits five copies of
transmittal letter and new Service Agreement 318, Interconnection
Facilities Study Agreement etc.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091203-0061.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-375-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits Third Revised Sheet
618 et al. to FERC Electric Tariff Sixth Revised volume 1, to be
effective 1/1/10.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091203-0060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 23, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-376-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc submits revised pages to its
Open Access Transmission Tariff to implement a rate change for the ITC
Great Plains, LLC etc.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091203-0059.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 23, 2009.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES09-58-001.
    Applicants: Northeast Utilities Service Company.
    Description: Amendment to Application of Northeast Utilities
Service Company for authorization to issue short-term debt securities.
    Filed Date: 12/03/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091203-5055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, December 14, 2009.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:

    Docket Numbers: OA08-91-002.
    Applicants: Black Hills Power, Inc.
    Description: Black Hills Power, Inc submits revised pages to the
Schedule 4 of FERC Electric Tariff Second Substitute First Revised
Volume 4.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091203-0058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, December 23, 2009.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings

    Docket Numbers: RD10-5-000.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corp.
    Description: Petition of the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation for Approval of Interpretations to Reliability Standards
MOD-001-1 and MOD-029-1.
    Filed Date: 12/02/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091202-5129.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 08, 2010.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:

    Docket Numbers: RR09-4-001.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc., North American Electric
Reliability Corp.
    Description: Compliance Filing of North American Electric
Reliability Corporation and Southwest Power Pool, Inc. to September 17,
2009 Commission Order.
    Filed Date: 12/01/2009.
    Accession Number: 20091201-5173.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, December 22, 2009.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-29663 Filed 12-11-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 12, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 63169-63172]
[FR Doc No: 2011-25770]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0479; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-154-AD;
Amendment 39-16827; AD 2011-21-04]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier Inc. Model DHC-8-102, -103,
-106, -201, -202, -301, -311, and -315 Airplanes; Equipped With Certain
Cockpit Door Installations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
that applies to the products listed above. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an
aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    During structural testing of the cockpit door, it was observed
that the door lower hinge block rotated which resulted in
disengagement of the mating hinge pin and excessive door deflection.
The lower hinge block rotated because it was attached to its support
structure with only one attachment bolt, which prevented it from
reacting to any moment force. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in breakage and uncontrolled release of the cockpit
door under certain decompression situations.
    After incorporation of Modsum 8Q900267 * * *, an operator
reported a failure to complete the cockpit door removal function
test. This condition, if not corrected, could result in the
inability to remove the cockpit door for emergency egress. * * *

We are issuing this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective November 16, 2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of November 16,
2011.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-54, Revision A, dated
November 5, 2004, as of July, 18, 2006 (71 FR 34006, June 13, 2006).

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andreas Rambalakos, Aerospace
Engineer, Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on June 8, 2011 (76 FR
33173), and proposed to supersede AD 2006-12-16, Amendment 39-14642 (71
FR 34006, June 13, 2006). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:

    During structural testing of the cockpit door, it was observed
that the door lower hinge block rotated which resulted in
disengagement of the mating hinge pin and excessive door deflection.
The lower hinge block rotated because it was attached to its support
structure with only one attachment bolt, which prevented it from
reacting to any moment force. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in breakage and uncontrolled release of the cockpit
door under certain decompression situations.
    After incorporation of Modsum 8Q900267 * * *, an operator
reported a failure to complete the cockpit door removal function
test. This condition, if not corrected, could result in the
inability to remove the cockpit door for emergency egress.
Therefore, * * * this [Canadian] directive is issued to require
rework of the cockpit door striker plate and replacement of the
latch block for the affected aircraft serial numbers. * * *

You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received. The commenter supports the
NPRM (76 FR 33173, June 8, 2011).

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and

determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 17 products of U.S.
registry.
    The actions that are required by AD 2006-12-16 (71 FR 34006, June
13, 2006) and retained in this AD take between 3 and 6 work-hours per
product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work-hour. Required parts
cost about $2,000 per product. Based on these figures, the estimated
cost of the currently required actions is between $2,255 and $2,510 per
product.
    We estimate that it will take about 3 work-hours per product to
comply with the new basic requirements of this AD. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Required parts will cost about $2,000 per
product. Where the service information lists required parts costs that
are covered under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no
charge for these parts. As we do not control warranty coverage for
affected parties, some parties may incur costs higher than estimated
here. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD to the
U.S. operators to be $38,335, or $2,255 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ''significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ''significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (76 FR 33173, June 8, 2011),
the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-14642 (71 FR
34006, June 13, 2006) and adding the following new AD:

2011-21-04 Bombardier Inc.: Amendment 39-16827. Docket No. FAA-2011-
0479; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-154-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective November
16, 2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-12-16, Amendment 39-14642 (71 FR
34006, June 13, 2006).

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier Model DHC-8-102, -103, -106, -
201, -202, -301, -311, and -315 airplanes, certificated in any
category; serial numbers (S/Ns) 003 through 557 inclusive; equipped
with cockpit door installation part numbers (P/Ns) identified in
table 1 of this AD.

         Table 1--Cockpit Door Installations Affected by This AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  P/N                             Dash number(s)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
82510074...............................  All.
82510294...............................  All.
82510310...............................  -001.
8Z4597.................................  -001.
H85250010..............................  All.
82510700...............................  All.
82510704...............................  All except -502
                                         and -503.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 52: Doors.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:

    During structural testing of the cockpit door, it was observed
that the door lower hinge block rotated which resulted in
disengagement of the mating hinge pin and excessive door deflection.
The lower hinge block rotated because it was attached to its support
structure with only one attachment bolt, which prevented it from
reacting to any moment force. This condition, if not corrected,
could result in breakage and uncontrolled release of the cockpit
door under certain decompression situations.
    After incorporation of Modsum 8Q900267 * * * an operator
reported a failure to complete the cockpit door removal function
test. This condition, if not corrected, could result in the
inability to remove the cockpit door for emergency egress. * * *

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Restatement of Requirements of AD 2006-12-16 Amendment 39-14642 (71 FR
34006, June 13, 2006), With New Service Information

Modification

    (g) Within 24 months after July 18, 2006 (the effective date of
AD 2006-12-16 Amendment 39-14642 (71 FR 34006, June 13, 2006)),
modify the cockpit door from a single-point attachment to a two-
point attachment in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of the applicable service bulletin in table 2 of this AD. For
airplane serial numbers 452, 464, 490, 506, and 508 through 557
inclusive: After the effective date of this AD, use Bombardier
Service Bulletin 8-52-58, Revision A, dated November 17, 2006.

   Table 2--Bombardier Service Bulletins for Modification Required by
                        Paragraph (g) of This AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Use this Bombardier Service Bulletin--   For airplane serial numbers--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8-52-54, Revision A, dated November 5,   003 through 451 inclusive, 453
 2004.                                    through 463 inclusive, 465
                                          through 489 inclusive, 491
                                          through 505 inclusive, and
                                          507.
8-52-58, dated May 12, 2004, or          452, 464, 490, 506, and 508
 Revision A, dated November 17, 2006.     through 557 inclusive.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note 1:  Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-54, Revision A, dated
November 5, 2004, refers to Bombardier Series 100/300 Modification
Summary (Modsum) 8Q100859 as an additional source of guidance for
installing a hinge pin with a two-point attachment. Bombardier
Service Bulletin 8-52-58, dated May 12, 2004, or Revision A, dated
November 17, 2006, refers to Bombardier Series 100/300 Modsum
8Q900267 as an additional source of guidance for reworking and
installing the cockpit door, and reworking the lower hinge
attachment to provide a downward-facing pin with a two-point
attachment.

Prior/Concurrent Requirements

    (h) Prior to or concurrently with the modification in paragraph
(g) of this AD, do the applicable actions specified in table 3 of
this AD, in accordance with a method approved by either the Manager,
New York Aircraft Certification (ACO), FAA; or Transport Canada
Civil Aviation (TCCA) (or its delegated agent).

 Table 3--Bombardier Service Bulletins for Requirements of Paragraph (h)
                               of This AD
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  For airplanes affected by
Bombardier Service Bulletin--    That have these     Do these actions--
                                serial numbers--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
8-52-54, Revision A, dated    003 through 407       Rework the cockpit
 November 5, 2004.             inclusive, 409        door emergency
                               through 412           release.
                               inclusive, and 414
                               through 433
                               inclusive.
                                                    Install a new label
                                                     regarding alternate
                                                     release of the
                                                     door.
8-52-58, dated May 12, 2004,  452, 464, 490, 506,   Install the cockpit
 or Revision A, dated          and 508 through 557   door.
 November 17, 2006.            inclusive.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Note 2:  Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-54, Revision A, dated
November 5, 2004, refers to De Havilland Aircraft of Canada,
Limited, Modification 8/2337 as an additional source of guidance for
reworking the cockpit door emergency release; and Modification 8/
3339 as additional source of guidance for installing a new label
regarding alternate release of the door; on airplanes having serial
numbers 003 through 407 inclusive, 409 through 412 inclusive, and
414 through 433 inclusive.

    Note 3:  Bombardier Service Bulletins 8-52-58, dated May 12,
2004; and Revision A, dated November 17, 2006; refer to Bombardier
Modsum 8Q200015, as an additional source of guidance for installing
the cockpit door, on airplanes having serial numbers 452, 464, 490,
506, and 508 through 557 inclusive.

Actions Done in Accordance With Previous Revision of Service Bulletin

    (i) Actions done before July 18, 2006, in accordance with
Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-54, dated May 12, 2004, are
acceptable for compliance with the corresponding requirements in
paragraph (g) of this AD.

New Requirements of This AD

    (j) For airplanes having S/N 452, 464, 490, 506, and 508 through
557 inclusive, and on which the requirements in paragraph (g) of
this AD have been done as of the effective date of this AD: Within
12 months after the effective date of this AD rework the cockpit
door striker plate and replace the latch block, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-
61, dated October 20, 2006.
    (k) For airplanes having S/Ns 452, 464, 490, 506, and 508
through 557 inclusive, and on which the requirements in paragraph
(g) of this AD have not been done as of the effective date of this
AD: Prior to or concurrently with doing the modification required in
paragraph (g) of this AD, rework the cockpit door striker plate and
replace the latch block, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-61, dated October
20, 2006.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 4: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (l) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
New York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (m) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2005-34R1,
dated August 15, 2007; Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-54, Revision
A, dated November 5, 2004;

Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-58, Revision A, dated November 17,
2006; and Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-61, dated October 20,
2006; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (n) You must use the following service information to do the
applicable actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise. The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
Part 51 of the following service information on the date specified:
    (1) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-58, Revision A, dated
November 17, 2006, approved for IBR November 16, 2011;
    (2) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-61, dated October 20, 2006,
approved for IBR November 16, 2011;
    (3) Bombardier Service Bulletin 8-52-54, Revision A, dated
November 5, 2004, approved for IBR July 18, 2006 (71 FR 34006, June
13, 2006).
    (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet
http://www.bombardier.com.
    (5) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (6) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 23, 2011.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-25770 Filed 10-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 9, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 197)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 59488-59491]
[DOCID:fr09oc08-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0147; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-294-AD;
Amendment 39-15686; AD 2008-21-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -
800, and -900 Series Airplanes Equipped With CFM56-7 Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD), which applies to certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, and -800
series airplanes. That AD currently requires repetitive inspections to
detect damage of the aft strut insulation blanket, and eventual
replacement of the insulation blankets with new, improved blankets.
This new AD adds airplanes to the applicability and requires
installation of a new heat insulation blanket and new cover plate on
the left and right side engine struts. This new AD does not retain the
requirements of the existing AD but does terminate the requirements of
the existing AD. This AD results from reports of damaged heat
insulation blankets on the engine struts. We are issuing this AD to
prevent exposure of the lower surface of the strut to extreme high
temperatures, consequent creation of a source of fuel ignition, and
increased risk of an uncontrollable fire and possible fuel tank
explosion.

DATES: This AD becomes effective November 13, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference

of a certain publication listed in the AD as of November 13, 2008.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Spitzer, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6510; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that supersedes AD 99-04-11, amendment 39-
11035 (64 FR 6791, February 11, 1999). The existing AD applies to
certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, and -800 series airplanes. That
NPRM was published in the Federal Register on February 8, 2008 (73 FR
7484). That NPRM proposed to add airplanes to the applicability of the
existing AD and require installation of a new heat insulation blanket
and new cover plate on the left and right side engine struts, which
would terminate the requirements of the existing AD.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the comments that have been
received on the NPRM.

Support for the NPRM

    Boeing concurs with the contents of the NPRM. AirTran Airways
(AirTran) and Continental Airlines (CAL) agree with the rule.

Request To Delay AD Until Service Bulletin Is Revised

    CAL notes that Boeing has released Information Notice (IN) 737-54-
1045 IN 01, dated December 4, 2007. CAL notes that this IN states that
Figures 2 and 4 of Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-54-
1045, dated July 25, 2007, do not correctly illustrate the proper
configuration of the insulation blanket. (We cited Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-54-1045 in the NPRM as the appropriate
source of service information.) Therefore, CAL requests that Boeing
revise the service bulletin before we enact the AD.
    We disagree with waiting until Boeing revises its service bulletin
before we issue the AD. We have determined that an unsafe condition
exists and that the actions in this AD must be done to ensure continued
safety. We do not consider that delaying this action until after the
release of the manufacturer's planned service bulletin is warranted
since sufficient instructions currently exist to do the required
replacement within the compliance time. Paragraph (h) of this AD
provides operators the opportunity to request an extension of the
compliance time if data are presented to justify the extension.
However, we agree that the information in IN 737-54-1045 IN 01, which
relates to the configuration of the insulation blanket, is important.
Therefore, we have revised paragraph (f) of this AD to include the
relevant information from the IN.

Request To Identify Supplier Part Numbers (P/Ns)

    AirTran points out that P/N S315A213-57, as specified in paragraph
(f) of the NPRM, is a specification number and that P/N 99A9257M is the
supplier part number for the insulation blanket that is listed in the
Boeing Model 737-700 Illustrated Parts Catalog. AirTran also points out
a similar supplier part number exists for the insulation blankets that
are prohibited from installation as specified in paragraph (g) of the
NPRM. Therefore, AirTran requests that we identify both the Boeing
specification number and the supplier part number in the AD.
    We disagree with the request to include supplier part numbers. The
Boeing specification number (P/N) S315A213-57 is the high-level
identifier for the part. This specification number is printed on each
authorized vendor part that is made to Boeing specifications in
accordance with the Boeing specification control document. Each
authorized vendor can have a different part number. Therefore, using
the specification P/N S315A213-57 should prevent any confusion. We have
not changed the AD in this regard.

Request To Extend Compliance Time

    Air Transport Association (ATA), on behalf of its member American
Airlines (AA), is concerned with the proposed 60-month compliance
period. The commenters note that the industry standard maintenance
interval for the affected Boeing Model 737 airplanes is 72 months.
Therefore, a 60-month compliance period would unnecessarily increase
out-of-service time and related costs. The commenters propose a 72-
month compliance time, which would align more economically with
industry standard maintenance review board (MRB) task intervals.
    We do not agree with the request to extend the compliance time. In
developing an appropriate compliance time for this action, we
considered the urgency associated with the subject unsafe condition,
the availability of required parts, and the fact that the modification
takes 4 work hours. According to the manufacturer, an ample number of
required parts will be available to do the installation on the U.S.
fleet within the proposed compliance time. In consideration of these
items, we have determined that a 60-month compliance time will ensure
an acceptable level of safety. However, according to the provisions of
paragraph (h) of this AD, we may approve requests to adjust the
compliance time if the request includes data that prove that the new
compliance time would provide an acceptable level of safety. We have
not changed the AD in this regard.

Request To Allow Additional Time for Parts Installation

    CAL notes that paragraph (g) of the NPRM states that operators may
not install a heat insulation blanket, P/N S315A213-42 or -47, on any
airplane after the effective date of the AD. CAL requests that
operators be given an additional 60 days after the effective date of
the AD to ensure ``illegal'' parts are purged from the inventory and
Boeing is able to supply spare parts.
    We contacted CAL to obtain additional technical information in
respect to this comment. CAL indicated that they initially had concerns
over parts availability and long lead times to obtain P/N S315A213-57
heat insulation blankets. CAL stated that after checking with Boeing,
parts availability and lead times are adequate and their comment is no
longer relevant. We have not changed the AD in this regard.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments

that have been received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD with the change described previously.
We have determined that this change will neither increase the economic
burden on any operator nor increase the scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 2,148 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 740 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The following table provides the estimated costs for U.S. operators to
comply with this AD. The average labor rate is $80 per work hour.

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Work                        Cost per
                       Action                          hours        Parts           airplane        Fleet cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Installation (new action)...........................       4           $4,730           $5,050       $3,737,000
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
removing amendment 39-11035 (64 FR 6791, February 11, 1999) and by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

2008-21-02 Boeing: Amendment 39-15686. Docket No. FAA-2008-0147;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-294-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective November 13, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 99-04-11.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800,
and -900 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-54-1045,
dated July 25, 2007.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports of damaged heat insulation
blankets on the engine struts. We are issuing this AD to prevent
exposure of the lower surface of the strut to extreme high
temperatures, consequent creation of a source of fuel ignition, and
increased risk of uncontrollable fire and possible fuel tank
explosion.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Installation

    (f) Within 60 months after the effective date of this AD,
install a new heat insulation blanket, part number (P/N) S315A213-
57, and a new cover plate on the left and right side engine struts
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 737-54-1045, dated July 25, 2007, except
Figure 2 and Figure 4 of the service bulletin should show four holes
on the aft edge of the heat insulation blanket instead of two.
Operators should also note that on installation of the heat
insulation blanket, the two inner holes on the aft edge of the heat
insulation blanket are not used or filled.

Parts Installation

    (g) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
heat insulation blanket, P/N S315A213-42 or -47, on any airplane.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (h)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, ATTN: Samuel Spitzer, Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch,
ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (i) You must use Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 737-
54-1045, dated July 25, 2007, to perform the actions that are
required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director
of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of
this document in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle,
Washington 98124-2207, for a copy of this service information. You
may review copies at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601
Lind Avenue,

SW., Renton, Washington; or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on September 29, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E8-23573 Filed 10-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 108 (Wednesday, June 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33877-33880]
[FR Doc No: 2013-13274]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69671; File No. SR-Phlx-2013-59]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Apply a
Strategy Fee Cap to Jelly Rolls

    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on May 21, 2013 NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to adopt a strategy fee cap applicable to
jelly rolls.
    While changes to the Pricing Schedule pursuant to this proposal are
effective upon filing, the Exchange has designated the proposed
amendment to be operative on May 22, 2013.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/, at the principal
office of the Exchange, on the Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to amend the strategy fee caps which
are currently located in Section II, entitled ``Multiply Listed
Options'' \3\ Today, the Exchange caps certain dividend, merger, short
stock interest and reversal and conversion floor option transactions.
The Exchange is proposing to also cap jelly roll strategies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This includes options overlying equities, ETFs, ETNs and
indexes which are Multiply Listed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A jelly roll strategy is defined as transactions created by
entering into two separate positions simultaneously. One position
involves buying a put and

selling a call with the same strike price and expiration. The second
position involves selling a put and buying a call, with the same strike
price, but with a different expiration from the first position. The
Exchange proposes to include this definition in Section II of the
Pricing Strategy in the section entitled ``Strategies Defined.''
    The Exchange proposes to offer a strategy cap for jelly rolls.
Today, Specialist,\4\ Market Maker,\5\ Professional,\6\ Firm \7\ and
Broker-Dealer \8\ floor option transaction charges in Multiply Listed
Options are capped at $1,250 for dividend, merger and short stock
interest strategies executed on the same trading day in the same
options class when such members are trading in their own proprietary
accounts, and option transaction charges in Multiply Listed Options are
capped at $700 for reversal and conversion strategies executed on the
same trading day in the same options class. Floor option transaction
charges in Multiply Listed Options for dividend, merger, short stock
interest and reversal and conversion strategies combined are further
capped at $35,000 per member organization, per month when such members
are trading in their own proprietary accounts (``Monthly Strategy
Cap''). Reversal and conversion strategy executions are not included in
the Monthly Strategy Cap for a Firm. Further, to qualify for a strategy
fee cap, the buy and sell side of a transaction must originate from the
Exchange floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ A ``Specialist'' is an Exchange member who is registered as
an options specialist pursuant to Rule 1020(a).
    \5\ A ``market maker'' includes Registered Options Traders (Rule
1014(b)(i) and (ii)), which includes Streaming Quote Traders (see
Rule 1014(b)(ii)(A)) and Remote Streaming Quote Traders (see Rule
1014(b)(ii)(B)). Directed Participants are also market makers.
    \6\ The term ``Professional'' means any person or entity that
(i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) places more
than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a
calendar month for its own beneficial account(s). See Rule
1000(b)(14).
    \7\ The term ``Firm'' applies to any transaction that is
identified by a member or member organization for clearing in the
Firm range at OCC.
    \8\ The term ``Broker-Dealer'' applies to any transaction which
is not subject to any of the other transaction fees applicable
within a particular category.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to cap Specialist, Market Maker,
Professional, Firm and Broker-Dealer floor option transaction charges
in Multiply Listed Options at $700 for jelly roll strategies executed
on the same trading day in the same options class. Further, the
Exchange will include jelly rolls in the Monthly Strategy Cap so that
floor option transaction charges in Multiply Listed Options for
dividend, merger, short stock interest, reversal and conversion and
jelly roll strategies combined will continue to be capped at $35,000
per member organization, per month when such members are trading in
their own proprietary accounts for purposes of the Monthly Strategy
Cap, except for a Firm. Similar to reversal and conversion strategy
executions, jelly rolls will not be included in the Monthly Strategy
Cap for a Firm. The Exchange proposes to note for purposes of clarity
in the Pricing Schedule that, as is the case today for reversal and
conversion strategy executions, jelly rolls are included in the Monthly
Firm Fee Cap.\9\ The Exchange proposes to amend the text of the Pricing
Schedule describing the applicability of the Monthly Market Maker Cap
\10\ and the Monthly Firm Fee Cap to clarify how jelly roll strategies
will be included or excluded from these caps as defined herein. For
purposes of clarity, the Exchange proposes to note in the Pricing
Schedule that all strategy executions are excluded from the Monthly
Market Maker Cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Firms are subject to a maximum fee of $75,000 (``Monthly
Firm Fee Cap''). Firm Floor Option Transaction Charges and QCC
Transaction Fees, as defined in this section above, in the
aggregate, for one billing month may not exceed the Monthly Firm Fee
Cap per member organization when such members are trading in their
own proprietary account. All dividend, merger, and short stock
interest strategy executions (as defined in this Section II) are
excluded from the Monthly Firm Fee Cap. Reversal and conversion
strategy executions (as defined in this Section II) are included in
the Monthly Firm Fee Cap. QCC Transaction Fees are included in the
calculation of the Monthly Firm Fee Cap.
    \10\ Specialists and Market Makers are subject to a ``Monthly
Market Maker Cap'' of $550,000 for: (i) Electronic and floor Option
Transaction Charges; (ii) QCC Transaction Fees (as defined in
Exchange Rule 1080(o) and Floor QCC Orders, as defined in 1064(e));
and (iii) fees related to an order or quote that is contra to a PIXL
Order or specifically responding to a PIXL auction. The trading
activity of separate Specialist and Market Maker member
organizations is aggregated in calculating the Monthly Market Maker
Cap if there is Common Ownership between the member organizations.
All dividend, merger, short stock interest and reversal and
conversion strategy executions (as defined in this Section II) are
excluded from the Monthly Market Maker Cap.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to receive the applicable strategy caps today, members are
required to designate on the trade ticket whether the trade involves a
dividend, merger, short stock interest, or reversal and conversion
strategy by entering the proper code on the trading ticket \11\ and
into the system, or directly into the Floor Broker Management System
\12\ (``FBMS'').\13\ In the alternative, members may request Exchange
staff on the trading floor input the code into the system.\14\ The
Exchange will require members to designate a ``Z4'' on the trading
ticket in order to receive the strategy cap for a jelly roll strategy,
similar to the manner in which reversal and conversion strategies are
designated today. The Exchange will note the required designation in a
memorandum to floor members when it announces the availability of the
strategy cap for jelly rolls.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Exchange has designated ``Z1'' for dividend strategies,
``Z2'' for merger strategies, ``Z3'' for short stock interest
strategies and ``Z4'' for reversal and conversion strategies.
    \12\ FBMS is designed to enable Floor Brokers and/or their
employees to enter, route and report transactions stemming from
options orders received on the Exchange. FBMS also is designed to
establish an electronic audit trail for options orders represented
and executed by Floor Brokers on the Exchange, such that the audit
trail provides an accurate, time-sequenced record of electronic and
other orders, quotations and transactions on the Exchange, beginning
with the receipt of an order by the Exchange, and further
documenting the life of the order through the process of execution,
partial execution, or cancellation of that order. See Exchange Rule
1080, Commentary .06.
    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65228 (August 30,
2011), 76 FR 55453 (September 7, 2011) (SR-Phlx-2012-73) (notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposed rule change relating
to reversal and conversion strategies).
    \14\ The system refers to PHLX XL[supreg], the Exchange's
automated trading system. The Exchange believes that providing
members the ability to request Exchange staff to mark a Strategy
Trade on the day the strategy is executed would provide members with
a means to ensure the Strategy Trade is properly marked for purposes
of pricing in the event that a floor broker inadvertently forgot to
mark a trade. Therefore, the Exchange requires that members
executing Strategy Trades either: (1) Enter a code on the trading
ticket and into the system; (2) enter a code directly into FBMS; or
(3) request that the information be inputted into the system by
Exchange staff on the trading floor, on the day the order was
executed, to take advantage of certain pricing caps for which they
may qualify.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Pricing
Schedule is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \15\ in general,
and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\16\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among Exchange members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that adopting a strategy cap for jelly rolls
is reasonable because it should encourage members and member
organizations to transact a greater number of jelly roll strategies on
the Exchange's trading floor in order that they may benefit from the
fee cap. The Exchange also believes that it is reasonable to permit
jelly roll strategy executions to count toward the Monthly Strategy Cap
when members are trading in their own proprietary account to receive
the benefit of the combined executions, which will include the ability
to achieve the Monthly Strategy Cap by transacting jelly rolls as well
as

dividend, merger, short stock interest and reversal and conversion
strategies. In addition, other options exchanges offer fee caps for
jelly rolls, namely NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca''),\17\ NYSE Amex,
Inc. (``NYSE Amex'') \18\ and the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``CBOE'') \19\ for strategies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ NYSE Arca offer a $750 cap on transaction fees for Strategy
Executions involving (a) reversals and conversions, (b) box spreads,
(c) short stock interest spreads, (d) merger spreads, and (e) jelly
rolls. The cap applies to each Strategy Execution executed in
standard option contracts on the same trading day in the same option
class. See NYSE Arca General Options and Trading Permit (OTP) Fees.
    \18\ NYSE Amex offers a $750 cap on transaction fees for
Strategy Executions involving (a) reversals and conversions, (b) box
spreads, (c) short stock interest spreads, (d) merger spreads, and
(e) jelly rolls. The cap applies to all Strategy Executions executed
in standard option contracts on the same trading day in the same
option class. See NYSE Amex Options Fee Schedule.
    \19\ Market-maker, broker-dealer and non-Trading Permit Holder
market-maker transaction fees are capped at $1,000 for all
reversals, conversions and jelly roll strategies executed on the
same trading day in the same option class, excluding any option
class on which the Exchange charges the Index License surcharge fee.
See CBOE's Fees Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that adopting a strategy cap for jelly rolls
is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because all market
participants that are assessed transaction fees will have an
opportunity to cap floor option transaction charges in Multiply Listed
Options with respect to jelly rolls. In addition, the Exchange believes
that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to continue to
require that all fee cap strategies, including jelly rolls, which
combine executions for purposes of the Monthly Strategy Cap, must be
traded in a member's own proprietary account. The Exchange is not
amending the calculation of the Monthly Strategy Cap which will
continue to impose the same requirements on members for all strategies
to qualify for the Monthly Strategy Caps.
    The Exchange's proposal to exclude Firm floor options transaction
charges related to reversal and conversion strategies, and now jelly
rolls, from the Monthly Strategy Cap is reasonable because these fees
would be capped as part of the Monthly Firm Fee Cap, which applies only
to Firms. The Exchange believes that the exclusion of Firm floor
options transaction charges related to reversal and conversion
strategies and now jelly rolls from the Monthly Strategy Cap is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because Firms, unlike other
market participants, have the ability to cap transaction fees up to
$75,000 per month with the Monthly Firm Fee Cap. The Exchange would
include floor option transaction charges related to jelly roll
strategies in the Monthly Strategy Cap for Professionals, and Broker
Dealers, when such members are trading in their own proprietary
accounts, because these market participants are not subject to the
Monthly Firm Fee Cap or other similar cap. While Specialists and Market
Makers are subject to a Monthly Market Maker Cap on both electronic and
floor options transaction charges, jelly rolls would be excluded from
the Monthly Market Maker Cap, as all other strategy transactions are
excluded from this cap.\20\ For the reasons described above, the
Exchange believes including jelly roll strategies in the Monthly Firm
Fee Cap is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because the cap provides an incentive for Firms to transact floor
transactions on the Exchange, which brings increased liquidity and
order flow to the floor for the benefit of all market participants.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ The reversal and conversion strategy executions are
excluded from the Monthly Market Maker Cap. See Section II of the
Pricing Schedule.
    \21\ Firms are eligible to cap floor options transactions
charges and QCC Transaction Fees as part of the Monthly Firm Fee
Cap. QCC Transaction Fees apply to QCC Orders as defined in Exchange
Rule 1080(o) and Floor QCC Orders as defined in 1064(e). See Section
II of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that its proposal to apply jelly roll
strategy fee caps to orders originating from the Exchange floor is
reasonable because members pay floor brokers to execute trades on the
Exchange floor. The Exchange believes that offering fee caps to members
executing floor transactions defrays brokerage costs associated with
executing strategy transactions and continues to incentivize members to
utilize the floor for certain executions.\22\ The Exchange believes
that its proposal to apply jelly roll strategy fee caps to orders
originating from the Exchange floor is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because today all other strategy fee caps are only
applicable for floor transactions. The Exchange believes that a
requirement that both the buy and sell sides of the order originate
from the floor to qualify for the fee cap constitutes equal treatment
of members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ The Exchange's proposal would only apply the fee cap to
options transaction charges where buy and sell sides originate from
the Exchange floor. See proposed rule text in Section II of the
Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the proposed changes
apply uniformly to all members that incur transaction charges for jelly
rolls.\23\ Further, other options exchanges today offer fee caps on
jelly roll strategies; therefore, the Exchange believes the proposal is
consistent with robust competition and does not provide any unnecessary
burden on competition. Further, floor members pay floor brokers to
execute trades on the Exchange floor. The Exchange believes that
offering fee caps on jelly rolls to members executing floor
transactions and not electronic executions does not create an
unnecessary burden on competition because the fee cap defrays brokerage
costs associated with executing jelly roll strategy transactions,
similar to other strategies today. Also, requiring that both the buy
and sell sides of the order originate from the floor to qualify for the
fee cap constitutes equal treatment of members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ Customers are not assessed options transaction charges in
Section II of the Pricing Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market, comprised of
eleven exchanges, in which market participants can easily and readily
direct order flow to competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive or rebates to be inadequate.
Accordingly, the fee caps that are proposed by the Exchange, as
described in the proposal, are influenced by these robust market forces
and therefore must remain competitive with fees caps at other venues
and therefore must continue to be reasonable and equitably allocated to
those members that opt to direct orders to the Exchange rather than
competing venues.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\24\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine

whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-Phlx-2013-59 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2013-59. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2013-59 and should be
submitted on or before June 26, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-13274 Filed 6-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63758-63759]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22219]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2016-0094-1138; FRL-9952-38-OAR]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Information Collection for Importation of On-Highway
Vehicles and Motorcycles and Nonroad Engines, Vehicles, and Equipment;
EPA ICR Number 2583.01, OMB Control Number 2060--NEW

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to
submit an Information Collection Request (ICR) for the information
requirements for importation of on-highway vehicles and motorcycles and
nonroad engines, vehicles, and equipment to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB). This new ICR is the consolidation of two individual
ICRS that are currently approved by OMB. EPA currently has an approved
collection that covers the information requirements for importation of
on-highway vehicles which expires on October 31, 2016 (OMB Control
Number 2060-0095, ICR Number 0010.14). EPA also has an approved
collection for information requirements for importation of nonroad
engines and recreational vehicles (OMB Control Number 2060-0320, ICR
Number 1723.07), which expires February 28, 2017. Before submitting
this new ICR to OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments
on the proposed information collection as described below.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 15, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-
2016-0094 online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA Docket Center,
Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Holly Pugliese, Compliance Division,
Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Environmental Protection
Agency, 2000 Traverwood, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105; telephone number:
734-214-4288; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. EPA
will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as appropriate.
The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for review and
approval. At that time, EPA will issue another Federal Register notice
to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to
submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: This ICR will consolidate two separate ICRs that
currently individually cover EPA Declaration Forms 3520-1, 3520-21, and
3520-8. EPA Declaration Form 3520-1 is used by importers of on-highway
vehicles and motorcycles and EPA Declaration Form 3520-21 is used by
importers of nonroad vehicles, engines and equipment to help facilitate
importation of products at U.S. Borders. Each form identifies the
regulated category of engine or vehicle and the regulatory provisions
under which the importation is taking place. In addition, this ICR
covers the burden of EPA Form 3520-8 which is used to request final
importation clearance for Independent Commercial Importers (ICIs) of
on-highway vehicles who are required to bring the on-highway vehicles
into compliance and provide test results. This form is currently
covered by OMB 2060-0095. EPA is consolidating these two ICRS due to
the effort being undertaken by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection
to require electronic filing for all importers. Over the last several
years, CBP has been developing the Automated Commercial Environment
(ACE) for electronic filing. By the end of 2016, ACE will become the
primary system the trade community and other importers will use to
report imports and exports. Through ACE as the single window, manual
processes will be streamlined and automated, and paper submissions
(e.g. fillable PDFs) will essentially be eliminated. However, EPA will
continue to maintain the forms on our Web site in fillable PDF format.
    EPA does not collect the forms, but rather makes them available to
importers and CBP to facilitate entry of goods at the port. EPA may ask
for them upon request to assist CPB and/or EPA enforcement personnel
for any given import for which there are questions or issues. The forms
are primarily used by CBP at the time of importation to assist CBP in
making determination if entry should be allowed. CBP regulations
require that the forms be submitted as applicable at the time of entry;
see 19 CFR 12.73 and 12.74.
    Form Numbers: 3520-1, 3520-21, 3520-8.
    Frequency of response: Once per entry. (One form per shipment may
be used.)
    Respondents/affected entities: Information collected is from
individual importers, or companies who import and/or manufacture on-
highway vehicles and nonroad engines, vehicles, and equipment.

    Respondent's obligation to respond: Required for any importer to
legally import nonroad vehicles or engines into the U.S.
    Estimated number of respondents: 14,810.
    Total estimated burden: 13,985 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $513,633 (per year), includes $48,064
annualized capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in Estimates: EPA is establishing new burden estimates as
we combine the burden estimates for the two separate ICRs that
currently cover the forms.

    Dated: September 8, 2016.
Byron J. Bunker,
Director, Compliance Division, Office of Transportation and Air
Quality.
[FR Doc. 2016-22219 Filed 9-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 11, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 196)]
[Notices]
[Page 57923-57924]
[DOCID:fr11oc07-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

October 4, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC08-1-000.
    Applicants: Milliken & Company, Lockhart Power Company.
    Description: Milliken & Co and Lockhart Power Co submit a joint
application for approval of corporate reorganization.
    Filed Date: 10/01/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071003-0017.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 22, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: EC08-2-000.
    Applicants: Babcock & Brown Renewable Holdings Inc., Cedar Creek
Wind Holdings LLC, Cedar Creek Wind Energy, LLC, CCWE Holdings LLC,
Babcock & Brown Cedar Creek LLC, BP Wind Energy North America Inc.
    Description: Babcock & Brown Renewable Holdings Inc. et al. submit
an application for order authorizing Transfer of Control of
Jurisdictional Facilities under section 203 of the Federal Power Act.
    Filed Date: 10/01/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071003-0055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 22, 2007.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER05-1410-006.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits revisions to the PJM
Open Access Transmission Tariff to incorporate certain changes mandated
by the December 22 Order.
    Filed Date: 09/24/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070926-0113.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 15, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1014-001.
    Applicants: NSTAR Electric Company.
    Description: NSTAR Electric Co submits an update to its annual
informational filing.
    Filed Date: 10/01/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071003-0023.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 22, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1069-002.
    Applicants: American Electric Power Service Corporation.
    Description: American Electric Power Service Corp on behalf of
Public Service Company of Oklahoma et al submits compliance filing
providing for changes to its proposed formula rate.
    Filed Date: 10/01/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071003-0142.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 22, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1102-002.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits a revised Network
Integration Transmission Service Agreement with the City of Batavia.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071003-0021.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 19, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1232-001.
    Applicants: UniSource Energy Development Company.
    Description: UniSource Energy Development Co submits Exhibit A as a
supplement to its 8/1/07 filing of a Market-Based Rate Tariff.
    Filed Date: 09/07/2007.
    Accession Number: 20070911-0063.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 15, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1263-002.
    Applicants: High Sierra Power Marketing, LLC.
    Description: High Sierra Power Marketing LLC submits Substitute
Original Sheet 1, 2, 3 to its FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 10/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071004-0133.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 11, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1264-002.
    Applicants: Sierra Power Asset Marketing, LLC.
    Description: Sierra Power Asset Marketing LLC submits Substitute
Original Sheet 1, 2, and 3 to its FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume
1.
    Filed Date: 10/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071004-0134.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, October 11, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1278-001.
    Applicants: Alpha Energy Master, Ltd.
    Description: Alpha Energy Master Ltd submits an Amended Petition
for Acceptance of Initial Tariff, Waiver and Blanket Authority and
requests acceptance of FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 10/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071004-0135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 23, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1306-002.
    Applicants: NedPower Mount Storm, L.L.C.
    Description: MedPower Mount Storm, LLC submits a supplemental
amendment to its application for order accepting market-based rate
tariff.
    Filed Date: 10/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071003-0029.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 23, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1341-001.
    Applicants: York Generation Company LLC.
    Description: York Generation Co, LLC submits revised tariff sheets
to its notice of succession filed on 9/4/07.

    Filed Date: 10/01/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071003-0024.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, October 22, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1409-000.
    Applicants: Sierra Pacific Power Company, Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Sierra Pacific submits a request for shortened comment
period for Nevada Power Co and Sierra Pacific Power Co.
    Filed Date: 09/28/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071003-0018.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, October 19, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-12-000.
    Applicants: Central Vermont Public Service Corporation.
    Description: The Vermont Joint Owner's request for limited waiver
of the date for submission of composite offer forms under Market Rule 1
re Central Vermont Public Service Corporation et al.
    Filed Date: 10/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071004-0136.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 23, 2007.
    Docket Numbers: ER08-13-000.

    Applicants: MXEnergy Electric (PA).
    Description: MXEnergy Electric submits a notice of cancellation of
its Rate Schedule FERC 2, First Revised Sheet 1[n x dash]5.
    Filed Date: 10/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071004-0137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 23, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-14-000.
    Applicants: Alpha Domestic Power Trading, L.L.C.
    Description: Alpha Domestic Power Trading, LLC submits FERC
Electric Tariff, Original Volume 1.
    Filed Date: 10/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071004-0138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 23, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-15-000.
    Applicants: Midwest ISO Transmission Owners.
    Description: Midwest ISO Transmission Owners submits a new Schedule
2-A concerning compensation of generators for provision of Reactive
Supply & Voltage Control from Generation Sources Service.
    Filed Date: 10/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071004-0139.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 23, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-16-000.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Kansas Gas and Electric Co and Westar Energy, Inc
submits a Notice of Cancellation of an Agreement for Wholesale Electric
Service with City of Haven, Kansas.
    Filed Date: 10/02/2007.
    Accession Number: 20071004-0140.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, October 23, 2007.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov.
 To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Acting Deputy Director.
 [FR Doc. E7-20026 Filed 10-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P