[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 114 (Thursday, June 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35621-35622]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14008]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3594-000.
    Applicants: City of Anaheim, California.
    Description: Compliance Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 6/5/13.
    Accession Number: 20130605-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/26/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1403-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Bridgeport Fuel Cell, LLC.
    Description: Amendment to May 2, 2013 Dominion Bridgeport Fuel
Cell, LLC tariff filing.
    Filed Date: 6/4/13.
    Accession Number: 20130604-5142.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/14/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1630-001.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation, AES
Huntington Beach, L.L.C.
    Description: Amendments to RMR Agreement Under Docket ER13-1630 to
be effective 6/26/2013.
    Filed Date: 6/5/13.
    Accession Number: 20130605-5001.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/26/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1634-000.
    Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Description: Morgan Stanley TX Agreements 669 and 670 to be
effective 8/3/2013.
    Filed Date: 6/4/13.
    Accession Number: 20130604-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/25/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1635-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: 2548R1 KMEA and Westar Energy Meter Agent Agreement to
be effective 6/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 6/5/13.
    Accession Number: 20130605-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/26/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1636-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., Northeast Utilities Service
Company, The Connecticut Light and Power Company.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. and Northeast Utilities Service

Company, on behalf of The Connecticut Light and Power Company, Notice
of Cancellation of Original Service Agreement No. LGIA-ISONE/NU-06-02.
    Filed Date: 6/5/13.
    Accession Number: 20130605-5060.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/26/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1637-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: OATT Revised Attachment C (6/5/13) to be effective 6/
6/2013.
    Filed Date: 6/5/13.
    Accession Number: 20130605-5067.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/26/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1638-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Colorado.
    Description: 2013-06-05--TSGT-Comanche Telecom 344 to be effective
8/5/2013.
    Filed Date: 6/5/13.
    Accession Number: 20130605-5084.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/26/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-1639-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Original Service Agreement No. 3569--Queue Position
X2-012 to be effective 5/6/2013.
    Filed Date: 6/5/13.
    Accession Number: 20130605-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/26/13.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-741-002.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., Bangor Hydro Electric Company.
    Description: Oakfield LGIA Supplemental Compliance Filing to be
effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 6/5/13.
    Accession Number: 20130605-5045.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/26/13.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: June 5, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-14008 Filed 6-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 19, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 159)]
[Notices]
[Page 41924]
[DOCID:fr19au09-76]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2009-0008]

National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP); Assistance to Private
Sector Property Insurers, Availability of FY2010 Arrangement

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Each year the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is
required by the Write-Your-Own (WYO) program Financial Assistance/
Subsidy Arrangement (Arrangement) to notify the private insurance
companies (Companies) and to make available to the Companies the terms
for subscription or re-subscription to the Arrangement. In keeping with
that requirement, this notice provides the terms to the Companies to
subscribe or re-subscribe to the Arrangement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward L. Connor, DHS/FEMA, 1800 South
Bell Street, Room 720, Arlington, VA 20598-3020,<PHONE_NUMBER> (phone),
202-646-3445 (facsimile), or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(e-mail).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Write-Your-Own (WYO) program
Financial Assistance/Subsidy Arrangement (Arrangement), approximately
90 private sector property insurers issue flood insurance policies and
adjust flood insurance claims under their own names based on an
Arrangement with the Federal Insurance Administration (FIA) published
at 44 CFR part 62, appendix A. The WYO insurers receive an expense
allowance and remit the remaining premium to the Federal Government.
The Federal Government also pays WYO insurers for flood losses and pays
loss adjustment expenses based on a fee schedule. In addition, under
certain circumstances reimbursement for litigation costs, including
court costs, attorney fees, judgments, and settlements, are paid by FIA
based on documentation submitted by the WYO insurers. The complete
Arrangement is published in 44 CFR part 62, appendix A. Each year FEMA
is required to publish in the Federal Register and make available to
the Companies the terms for subscription or re-subscription to the
Arrangement.
    Since last year there have been no substantive changes to the
Arrangement.
    During August 2009, FEMA will send a copy of the offer for the
FY2010 Arrangement, together with related materials and submission
instructions, to all private insurance companies participating under
the current FY2009 Arrangement. Any private insurance company not
currently participating in the WYO Program but wishing to consider
FEMA's offer for FY2010 may request a copy by writing: DHS/FEMA,
Mitigation Directorate, Attn: Edward L. Connor, WYO Program, 1800 South
Bell Street, Room 720, Arlington, VA 20598-3020, or contact Edward
Connor at<PHONE_NUMBER> (facsimile), or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(e-mail).

    Dated: August 13, 2009.
Edward L. Connor,
Acting Federal Insurance Administrator, National Flood Insurance
Program, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.
[FR Doc. E9-19835 Filed 8-18-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9111-52-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 51 (Friday, March 17, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 14171]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05289]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1983-0002; FRL-9959-04-Region 4]

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List: Deletion of the Perdido Ground Water
Contamination Superfund Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency Region 4 is issuing a
Notice of Intent to Delete the Perdido Ground Water Contamination
Superfund Site (Site) located in Baldwin County, Alabama, from the
National Priorities List (NPL) and requests public comments on this
proposed action. The NPL, promulgated pursuant to section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is an appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and the
State of Alabama, through the Alabama Department of Environmental
Management (ADEM), have determined that all appropriate response
actions under CERCLA have been completed. However, this deletion does
not preclude future actions under Superfund.

DATES: Comments must be received by April 17, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1983-0002, by mail to Deborah P. Cox, PE, Remedial Project
Manager, Superfund Restoration and Sustainability Branch, Superfund
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Comments may also be submitted
electronically or through hand delivery/courier by following the
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Deborah P. Cox, PE, Remedial Project
Manager, Superfund Restoration and Sustainability Branch, Superfund
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960, phone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the ``Rules and Regulations'' Section of
today's Federal Register, we are publishing a direct final Notice of
Deletion of the Site without prior Notice of Intent to Delete because
we view this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipate no adverse
comment. We have explained our reasons for this deletion in the direct
final Notice of Deletion, and those reasons are incorporated herein. If
we receive no adverse comment(s) on this deletion action, we will not
take further action on this Notice of Intent to Delete. If we receive
adverse comment(s), we will withdraw the direct final Notice of
Deletion, and it will not take effect. We will, as appropriate, address
all public comments in a subsequent final Notice of Deletion based on
this Notice of Intent to Delete. We will not institute a second comment
period on this Notice of Intent to Delete. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final Notice of Deletion
which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous substances, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1321(c)(2); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
12777, 56 FR 54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR
2923; 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.

    Dated: September 6, 2016.
V. Anne Heard,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2017-05289 Filed 3-16-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 102 (Tuesday, May 28, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24594-24595]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11041]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2017-0044; Docket No. PHMSA-2017-0045; Docket No.
PHMSA-2017-0046; Docket No. PHMSA-2017-0047]

Pipeline Safety: Request for Special Permit; Alaska Gasline
Development Corporation

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA is publishing this notice to seek public comments on
four special permit requests received from the Alaska Gasline
Development Corporation (AGDC). AGDC is seeking compliance relief from
certain requirements in the federal pipeline safety regulations for the
construction of an integrated liquefied natural gas project with
interdependent facilities for transporting and liquefying supplies of
natural gas in Alaska.

DATES: Submit any comments regarding this special permit request by
July 29, 2019.

ADDRESSES: Comments should reference the docket number for the specific
special permit request and may be submitted in the following ways:
     E-Gov website: http://www.Regulations.gov. This site
allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice
issued by any agency.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
     Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Docket Management System: U.S. Department
of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays.
    Instructions: At the beginning of your comments, you should
identify the docket number for the special permit request you are
commenting on. If you submit your comments by mail, please submit two
copies. To receive confirmation that PHMSA has received your comments,
please include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may
submit comments at http://www.Regulations.gov.

    Note:  Comments are posted including any personal information
provided, without changes or edits to http://www.Regulations.gov.
There is a privacy statement published on http://www.Regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    General: Ms. Kay McIver by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Technical: Mr. Joshua Johnson by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGDC plans to construct one integrated
liquefied natural gas (LNG) project

(Project) with interdependent facilities for transporting and
liquefying supplies of natural gas in Alaska, from the Point Thompson
Unit (PTU) and Prudhoe Bay Unit (PBU) production fields on the Alaska
North Slope to the proposed LNG Liquefaction Facility located in the
Kenai Peninsula of Alaska.
    The overall proposed LNG Project includes:
     Approximately 807-miles of 42-inch gas pipeline (Mainline
Pipeline);
     A LNG liquefaction facility located in the Kenai Peninsula
Borough and Cook Inlet Area of Alaska;
     A gas treatment plant (GTP) with the Prudhoe Bay Unit
(PBU) on the North Slope;
     Approximately 63-mile gas transmission line connecting the
GTP to the PTU gas production facility, and
     Approximately 1-mile gas transmission line connecting GTP
to the PBU gas production facility.
    The route of the 42-inch pipeline originates in the North Slope
Borough and traverses the Yukon-Koyukuk Census Area, the Fairbanks
North Star Borough, the Denali Borough, the Matanuska-Susitna Borough,
the Kenai Peninsula Borough, and terminates at the LNG Liquefaction
Facility. The LNG Project will offer natural gas that has been
processed into LNG for export in foreign commerce and opportunities for
in-state deliveries of natural gas. The maximum allowable operating
pressure (MAOP) of the Mainline Pipeline will be 2,075 psi. The
Mainline Pipeline is essential for the export of natural gas in foreign
commerce and will have a nominal design life of 30 years.
    PHMSA has received four special permit requests from the AGDC
seeking relief from compliance with certain Federal pipeline safety
regulations. The requests apply to the following areas:
    (1) Strain Based Design;
    (2) Transmission Mainline Block Valve Spacing;
    (3) Crack Arrestor Spacing; and
    (4) Three-Layer Polyethylene Coating.
    Each request includes technical analysis, draft special permit
conditions, draft environmental assessments, and location maps (other
details deemed necessary) provided by the operator and filed at http://www.Regulations.gov, under the assigned docket numbers. We invite
interested persons to participate by reviewing these special permit
requests and their associated draft environmental assessments and a
PHMSA prepared draft special permit with conditions at http://www.Regulations.gov, and by submitting written comments, data or other
views. Please include any comments on potential safety and
environmental impacts that may result if these special permits are
granted.
    Before issuing a decision on these special permit requests, PHMSA
will evaluate all comments received on or before the 60-day comment
period closing date. If it is possible to do so without incurring
additional expense or delays, comments received after the closing date
will be evaluated.
    The four special permit requests are as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Docket No.                     Requester              Regulation(s)        Nature of special permit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA-2017-0044...................  Alaska Gasline           49 CFR 192.103,         To authorize AGDC to use
                                     Development              192.105, 192.317, and   Strain-Based Design (SBD)
                                     Corporation (AGDC).      192.620.                for the construction of
                                                                                discrete and specified
                                                                                segments of the pipeline.
                                                                                The proposed SBD segments
                                                                                would consist of a 42-inch
                                                                                diameter pipe with a 0.862-
                                                                                inch wall thickness,
                                                                                constructed in accordance
                                                                                with API 5L Grade X70
                                                                                specifications. The
                                                                                segments are in the Yukon-
                                                                                Kuyokuk and Denali
                                                                                boroughs, are entirely
                                                                                within Class 1 locations,
                                                                                and not in any high
                                                                                consequence areas.
                                                                                The Project will be a new
                                                                                42-inch diameter natural
                                                                                gas pipeline of
                                                                                approximately 807 miles.
                                                                                It will originate at the
                                                                                Gas Treatment Plant on the
                                                                                Alaska North Slope site
                                                                                and terminate at the LNG
                                                                                Liquefaction Facility in
                                                                                the Cook Inlet, Alaska.
                                                                                The proposed SBD segments
                                                                                would have a MAOP of 2,075
                                                                                psi. 49 CFR 192.103
                                                                                requires pipe to be
                                                                                designed with sufficient
                                                                                wall thickness, or must be
                                                                                installed with adequate
                                                                                protection, to withstand
                                                                                anticipated external
                                                                                pressures and loads that
                                                                                will be imposed on the
                                                                                pipe after installation.
PHMSA-2017-0045...................  Alaska Gasline           49 CFR 192.197(a)(4)..  To authorize AGDC to use
                                     Development                                      alternatives to mainline
                                     Corporation (AGDC).                              block valve spacing of up
                                                                                to 50 miles in the very
                                                                                sparsely populated region
                                                                                north of Fairbanks borough
                                                                                in Alaska, and up to 30
                                                                                miles spacing south of
                                                                                Fairbanks in Class 1
                                                                                locations. 49 CFR
                                                                                192.179(a)(4) requires a
                                                                                maximum Class 1 location
                                                                                valve spacing of 20-miles.
PHMSA-2017-0046...................  Alaska Gasline           49 CFR 192.112(f)(1)..  To authorize AGDC to use
                                     Development                                      three-layer polyethylene
                                     Corporation (AGDC).                              coatings on all Mainline
                                                                                pipeline segments that are
                                                                                built to comply with
                                                                                alternative MAOP
                                                                                requirements. 49 CFR
                                                                                192.112(f)(1) requires a
                                                                                non-shielding external
                                                                                pipe coating.
PHMSA-2017-0047...................  Alaska Gasline           49 CFR 192.112(b).....  To authorize AGDC to use
                                     Development                                      crack arrestor spacing of
                                     Corporation (AGDC).                              up to 1,600 feet on all
                                                                                Mainline pipeline segments
                                                                                that are built to comply
                                                                                with alternative MAOP
                                                                                pressure requirements. 49
                                                                                CFR 192.112(b)(2)(iii)
                                                                                gives requirements for
                                                                                fracture arrest based upon
                                                                                pipe lengths. 49 CFR
                                                                                192.112(b)(3) outlines
                                                                                alternative arrest
                                                                                methods.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 22, 2019, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
Alan K. Mayberry,
Associate Administrator for Pipeline Safety.
[FR Doc. 2019-11041 Filed 5-24-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 36 (Thursday, February 23, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10755-10756]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4139]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-0001]

Request for Nominations for Voting Members on a Public Advisory
Committee; Risk Communication Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is requesting
nominations for members to serve on the Risk Communication Advisory
Committee, Office of Planning, Office of Policy and Planning, Office of
the Commissioner.
    FDA has a special interest in ensuring that women, minority groups,
and individuals with disabilities are adequately represented on
advisory committees and, therefore, encourages nominations of qualified
candidates from these groups.

DATES: Nominations received on or before April 23, 2012 will be given
first consideration for membership on the Risk Communication Advisory
Committee. Nominations received after April 23, 2012 will be considered
for nomination to the committee as later vacancies occur.

ADDRESSES: All nominations for membership should be sent electronically
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to the Advisory Committee Oversight and
Management Staff, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 32, rm. 5103, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regarding all nomination questions for
membership, the primary contact is: Lee L. Zwanziger, Risk
Communication Staff, Office of Planning, Office of Policy and Planning,
Office of the Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Fax: 301-847-
8611<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Information about becoming a member on an FDA advisory committee
can also be obtained by visiting FDA's Web site by using the following
link: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is requesting nomination for voting
members on the Risk Communication Advisory Committee.

I. General Description of the Committee Duties

    The Risk Communication Advisory Committee advises the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs or designee on methods to effectively communicate
risks associated with products regulated by the Food and Drug
Administration and in discharging responsibilities as they relate to
helping to ensure safe and effective drugs for human use and any other
product for which the Food and Drug Administration has regulatory
responsibility.
    The Committee reviews and evaluates strategies and programs
designed to communicate with the public about the risks and benefits of
FDA-regulated products so as to facilitate optimal use of these
products. The Committee also reviews and evaluates research relevant to
such communication to the public by both FDA and other entities. It
also facilitates interactively sharing risk and benefit information
with the public to enable people to make informed independent judgments
about use of FDA-regulated products.

II. Criteria for Voting Members

    The Committee consists of a core of 15 voting members including the
Chair. Members and the Chair are selected by the Commissioner or
designee from among authorities knowledgeable in fields such as social
marketing, health literacy, and other relevant areas. Members will
include experts on risk communication, experts on emerging postmarket
drug risks and individuals knowledgeable about and experienced in the
work of patient, consumer, and health professional organizations.
Almost all non-Federal members of this committee serve as Special
Government Employees. Some members will be selected to provide
experiential insight on the communication needs of the various groups
who use FDA-regulated products. The latter may include patients and
patients' family members, health professionals, communicators in
health, medicine and science, and persons affiliated with consumer,
specific disease, or patient safety advocacy groups. Members will be
invited to serve for terms of up to 4 years.

III. Nomination Procedures

    Any interested person may nominate one or more qualified
individuals for membership on the advisory committee. Self-nominations
are also accepted. Nominations must include a current, complete
r[eacute]sum[eacute] or curriculum vitae for each nominee, including
current business address and/or home address, telephone number, and
email address if available. Nominations must also specify the advisory
committee for which the nominee is recommended. Nominations must also
acknowledge that the nominee is aware of the nomination unless self-
nominated. FDA will ask potential candidates to provide detailed
information concerning such matters related to financial holdings,
employment, and research grants and/or contracts to permit evaluation
of possible sources of conflicts of interest.
    This notice is issued under the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5
U.S.C. app. 2) and 21 CFR part 14, relating to advisory committees.

    Dated: February 16, 2012.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2012-4139 Filed 2-22-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 155 (Thursday, August 11, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53004-53005]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19128]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0739]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Pittsburgh Steelers Fireworks; Allegheny River Mile
0.0-0.25, Ohio River Mile 0.0-0.1, Monongahela River Mile 0.0-0.1,
Pittsburgh, PA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters of the Allegheny River mile 0.0-0.25, Ohio River mile
0.0-0.1, Monongahela River mile 0.0-0.1. The safety zone is needed to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential
hazards created from a barge-based fireworks display. Entry of vessels
or persons into this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized
by the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh.

DATES: This rule is effective on August 12, 2016 from 9:30 p.m. until
11:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0739 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST1 Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh,
U.S. Coast Guard, at telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    This safety zone and fireworks displays are included in the list of
annually recurring safety zones published in 33 CFR 165.801, Table 1,
No. 59 as occurring on Sunday, Monday, or Thursday from September
through January each year following Pittsburgh Steelers home games. For
this year, the event sponsor is conducting an additional barge-based
fireworks display on August 12, 2016 and that display and required
safety zone location are not included in the published regulations.
This temporary final rule establishes that safety zone.
    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a NPRM with respect to this rule
because the Coast Guard received notice on July 25, 2016 that this
additional fireworks display would take place. After receiving and
fully reviewing the event information, circumstances, and exact
location, the Coast Guard determined that a safety zone is necessary to
protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential
hazards created from a barge-based fireworks display on the navigable
waterway. It would be impracticable to complete the full NPRM process
for this safety zone because it needs to be established by August 12,
2016. The fireworks display has been advertised and the local community
has prepared for the event.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. Delaying this rule
would be contrary to public interest of ensuring the safety of
spectators and vessels during the event. Immediate action is necessary
to prevent possible loss of life and property during the hazards
created by a barge-based fireworks display near and over the navigable
waterway.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1231. The Captain of the Port Pittsburgh (COTP) has determined that a
safety zone is needed on August 12, 2016.This rule is needed to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from potential hazards
created from a barge-based fireworks display.

IV. Discussion of the Rule

    This rule establishes a safety zone on August 12, 2016 from 9:30
p.m. until 11:30 p.m. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters
on the Allegheny River mile 0.0-0.25, Ohio River mile 0.0-0.1,
Monongahela River mile 0.0-0.1. The duration of the safety zone is
intended to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment from
potential hazards created from a barge-based firework display. No
vessel or person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and
Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety zone. This safety zone impacts a
small portion of the waterway for a limited duration of less than two
hours in the evening. Vessel traffic will be informed about the safety
zone through local notices to mariners. Moreover, the Coast Guard will
issue broadcast notices to mariners via VHF-FM marine channel 16 about
the zone and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to transit the
zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the

reasons stated in section V.A. above, this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section above.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in
this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a safety zone lasting less then two hours that will
prohibit entry to the Allegheny River mile 0.0-0.25, Ohio River mile
0.0-0.1, Monongahela River mile 0.0-0.1during the barge-based firework
event. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph
34 (g) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. An environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0739 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0739  Safety Zone; Pittsburgh Steelers Fireworks;
Allegheny River mile 0.0-0.25, Ohio River mile 0.0-0.1, Monongahela
River mile 0.0-0.1, Pittsburgh, PA.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: Pittsburgh
Steelers Fireworks; Allegheny River mile 0.0-0.25, Ohio River mile 0.0-
0.1, Monongahela River mile 0.0-0.1, Pittsburgh, PA.
    (b) Enforcement. This rule will be enforced, from 9:30 p.m. until
11:30 p.m. on August 12, 2016.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or a designated representative.
    (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the
zone must request permission from the COTP or a designated
representative. The COTP representative may be contacted at 412-221-
0807.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the COTP or their designated representative. Designated COTP
representatives include United States Coast Guard commissioned,
warrant, and petty officers.
    (d) Information Broadcasts. The COTP or a designated representative
will inform the public through broadcast notices to mariners of the
enforcement period for the safety zone as well as any changes in the
planned schedule.

L. McClain, Jr.,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2016-19128 Filed 8-10-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 189 (Monday, October 4, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54620-54622]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21550]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2021-0546]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, Louisville, KY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation on the Ohio River at mile marker 596. This action is
necessary to provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters
during the Captain's Quarters Sailing Regatta from October 9, 2021
through October 10, 2021. This regulation prohibits persons and vessels
from being in the limitied acess area unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port Sector Ohio Valley or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from October 9, 2021, through October 10,
2021.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2021-0546 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST3 Christopher Matthews, Sector Ohio Valley, U.S. Coast
Guard<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On July 5, 2021, River Cities Community Sailing Program notified
the Coast Guard that from noon to 5 p.m. on October 9 and Ocotber 10,
2021, it will be conducting a sailing regatta. In response, on August
4, 2021, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) titled ``Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, Louisville, KY''
[USCG-2021-0546] (86

FR 41909). There we stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments
on our proposed regulatory action related to this sailing regatta.
During the comment period that ended August 24, 2021, we received 0
comments.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to the public interest because immediate
action is needed to respond to the potential safety hazards associated
with the sailing regatta.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Sector Ohio
Valley (COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with the
sailing regatta to be used in this October 9 and 10, 2021 will be a
safety concern for anyone within the area. The purpose of this rule is
to ensure safety of vessels and the navigable waters in the safety zone
before, during, and after the scheduled event.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published
August 4, 2021. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM.
    This rule establishes a special local regulation from noon to 5
p.m. on October 9, 2021 and October 10, 2021. The special local
regulation will cover all navigable waters from mile marker 594 to 598
on the Ohio River. The duration of the zone is intended to ensure the
safety of the sailing vessels during the regatta. No vessel or person
will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission
from the COTP or a designated representative. To seek permission to
enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's representative by Sector Ohio
Valley command center at<PHONE_NUMBER>. Those in the regulated area must
comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP
or the designated representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the special local regulation. This special
local regulation restricts transit on a four-mile stretch of the Ohio
River for five hours on two days. Moreover, the Coast Guard will issue
Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs),
and Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs) about this special
local regulation so that waterway users may plan according for this
restriction on transit, and the rule allows vessel to request
permission to enter the zone.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received 0 comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated

implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1
(series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a two day sailing competition held
annually. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L61 of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-
001-01, Rev. 1. A Memorandum for the Record supporting this
determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating
the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70041; 33 CFR 1.05-1.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.T08-0462 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.T08-0462  Special Local Regulation; Ohio River, Louisville,
KY.

    (a) Regulated area. The following area is a special local regulated
area: All navigable waters of the Ohio River from Mile Marker (MM)
594.0 to MM 598.0, extending the entire width of the river.
    (b) Regulations. (1) All non-participants are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area described in paragraph (a) of this section unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley (COTP) or
their designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by Sector Ohio Valley command center at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Those in the regulated area must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the designated representative.
    (3) The Coast Guard will issue Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNMs),
Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs), and Marine Safety Information
Bulletins (MSIBs) about the special local regulation in this section.
    (c) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from noon
through 5 p.m. on October 9, 2021, and October 10, 2021.

    Dated: September 29, 2021.
A.M. Beach,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Ohio Valley.
[FR Doc. 2021-21550 Filed 10-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28661-28662]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12062]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2011-0372; FRL-9307-3]

Interim Final Determination To Defer Sanctions, Sacramento Metro
1-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, California

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Interim final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is making an interim final determination to defer
imposition of sanctions based on a proposed determination, published
elsewhere in this Federal Register, that the State of California is no
longer required to submit or implement a Clean Air Act (CAA) Section
185 fee program (Termination Determination) for the Sacramento Metro 1-
hour Ozone nonattainment area (Sacramento Metro Area) to satisfy anti-
backsliding requirements for the 1-hour Ozone standard.

DATES: This interim final determination is effective on May 18, 2011.
However, comments will be accepted until June 17, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2011-0372, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the on-line instructions.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Information that you consider CBI or otherwise protected should be
clearly identified as such and should not be submitted through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. http://www.regulations.gov is an
``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not know your identity or
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the public comment. If
EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily Wong, EPA Region IX, (415) 947-
4114<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.

I. Background

    On January 5, 2010 (75 FR 232), we published a finding that the
State of California failed to submit State Implementation Plans (SIPs)
to satisfy CAA section 185 for three 1-hour Ozone nonattainment areas:
Sacramento Metro Area, Southeast Desert, and Los Angeles-South Coast
Air Basin. As discussed in our January 2010 action, the finding
regarding the Sacramento Metro Area addressed the Yolo/Solano Air
Quality Management District, Feather River Air Quality Management
District, Placer County Air Pollution Control District and El Dorado
County Air Quality Management District. It did not address the
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District. This finding
started a sanctions clock for imposition of offset sanctions 18 months
after January 5, 2010 and highway sanctions 6 months later, pursuant to
section 179 of the CAA and our regulations at 40 CFR 52.31.
    On July 7, 2010 and in an update on April 13, 2011, the California
Air Resources Board (CARB) submitted a request that EPA determine that
the CAA section 185 obligation has been terminated for the Sacramento
Metro Area. This termination determination request was supported by
data demonstrating that the Sacramento Metro Area has attained the 1-
hour Ozone standard based on the most recent three years of complete,
quality-assured and certified data (2007-2009), and that the
improvement in air quality resulted from permanent and enforceable
emissions reductions. In the Proposed Rules section of today's Federal
Register, we have proposed approval of this submittal. Based on today's
proposed approval, we are taking this final rulemaking action,
effective on publication, to defer imposition of sanctions that were
triggered by our January 5, 2010 finding of failure to submit for the
Sacramento Metro Area based on a finding that it is more likely than
not that the Sacramento Metro Area is no longer obligated to submit a
185 program.
    EPA is providing the public with an opportunity to comment on this
deferral of sanctions. If comments are submitted that change our
assessment described in this final determination and the proposed CAA
section 185 termination determination for the Sacramento Metro Area, we
would take final action proposing to deny or denying the termination
determination request and lifting this deferral of the sanctions. If no
comments are submitted that change our assessment, then with regard to
the finding of failure to submit discussed previously, any imposed
sanctions would no longer apply and any sanction clocks would be
permanently terminated on the effective date of a final CAA section 185
termination determination.

II. EPA Action

    We are making an interim final determination to defer CAA section
179 sanctions associated with the Sacramento Metro Area's 1-hour Ozone
CAA section 185 obligation based on our concurrent proposal to approve
a CAA section 185 termination determination which would remove the
obligation of the state to submit a section 185 SIP when finalized.
    Because EPA has preliminarily determined that the State is not
obligated to submit the SIP that was the basis of EPA's finding of
failure to submit, relief from sanctions should be provided as quickly
as possible. Therefore, EPA is invoking the good cause exception under
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) in not providing an opportunity
for comment before this action takes effect (5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)).
However, by this action EPA is providing the public with

a chance to comment on EPA's determination after the effective date,
and EPA will consider any comments received in determining whether to
reverse such action.
    EPA believes that notice-and-comment rulemaking before the
effective date of this action is impracticable and contrary to the
public interest. EPA has reviewed the State's submittal and, through
its proposed action, is indicating that it is more likely than not that
the State is no longer obligated to submit the plan that was the basis
for the finding that started the sanctions clocks. Therefore, it is not
in the public interest to impose sanctions. Moreover, it would be
impracticable to go through notice-and-comment rulemaking on a finding
that the State no longer is required to submit the plan prior to the
rulemaking approving the State's termination determination. Therefore,
EPA believes that it is necessary to use the interim final rulemaking
process to defer sanctions while EPA completes its rulemaking process
on the approvability of the State's submittal. Moreover, with respect
to the effective date of this action, EPA is invoking the good cause
exception to the 30-day notice requirement of the APA because the
purpose of this notice is to relieve a restriction (5 U.S.C.
553(d)(1)).
    Note that today's action has no impact on the January 5, 2010 (75
FR 232) findings regarding the Southeast Desert and the Los Angeles-
South Coast Air Basin.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This action defers Federal sanctions and imposes no additional
requirements.
    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a
significant regulatory action.
    The administrator certifies that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
    This rule does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule does not have Tribal implications because it will not
have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian Tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    This action does not have Federalism implications because it does
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    The requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272) do not apply to
this rule because it imposes no standards.
    This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report to Congress and the Comptroller
General. However, section 808 provides that any rule for which the
issuing agency for good cause finds that notice and public procedure
thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest, shall take effect at such time as the agency promulgating the
rule determines. 5 U.S.C. 808(2). EPA has made such a good cause
finding, including the reasons therefore, and established an effective
date of May 18, 2011. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This rule is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 18, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purpose of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental regulations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: May 9, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2011-12062 Filed 5-17-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 66354]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26453]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13570-002]

Warm Springs Irrigation District; Notice of Technical Meeting

    a. Project Name and Number: Warm Springs Dam Hydroelectric Project
No. 13570
    b. Date and Time of Meeting: November 14, 2013; 11:00 a.m. Pacific
Time (2:00 p.m. Eastern Time).
    c. Place: Telephone conference call.
    d. FERC Contact: Kelly Wolcott<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or (202)
502-6480.
    e. Purpose of Meeting: Discuss the special status species plant
survey for Stanleya confertiflora requested by the U.S. Bureau of Land
Management on June 7, 2013; the coordination of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analysis; and the overall processing
schedule for the project.
    f. Proposed Agenda:
    1. Introduction
    2. Meeting objectives
    3. Plant survey discussion
    4. NEPA coordination
    5. Schedule of Project.
    g. A summary of the meeting will be prepared for the project's
record.
    h. All local, state, and federal agencies, Indian tribes, and other
interested parties are invited to participate by phone. Please contact
Kelly Wolcott at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER> by close of
business Thursday, November 7, 2013, to RSVP to receive specific
instructions on how to participate.

    Dated: October 29, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-26453 Filed 11-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 82 (Friday, April 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18547-18548]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08862]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR18-21-000]

CITGO Petroleum Corporation v. Colonial Pipeline Company; Notice
of Complaint

    Take notice that on April 20, 2018, pursuant Rule 206 of Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice and
Procedure \1\ and part 343 of the Commission's Rules and
Regulations,\2\ CITGO Petroleum

Corporation (Complainant) filed a formal complaint (complaint) against
Colonial Pipeline Company (Respondent) alleging that the rates charged
in Colonial's FERC Tariff No. 99.36.0 and predecessor tariffs are
unjust and unreasonable under sections 1(5), 6, 8, 9, 13, 15 and 16 of
the Interstate Commerce Act,\3\ all as more fully explained in the
complaint.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 18 CFR 385.206 (2017).
    \2\ 18 CFR 343.2 (2017).
    \3\ 49 U.S.C. App. 1(5), 6, 8, 9, 13, 15 and 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Complainant states that a copy of the complaint was served on the
contacts for Respondent listed on the Commission's list of Corporate
Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
eLibrary link and is available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the website that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
[email protected], or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 21, 2018.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-08862 Filed 4-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 173 (Thursday, September 8, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 54868-54870]
[FR Doc No: 2022-19278]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0686; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00088-T;
Amendment 39-22145; AD 2022-17-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus SAS Model A350-941 airplanes. This AD was prompted by a report
indicating that the inflatable free aisle restrictor (IFAR) on certain
single lane slide-rafts demonstrated inconsistent release behavior in
aft wind conditions. This AD requires replacing an affected part with a
serviceable part, as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference. This AD also
prohibits the installation of affected parts. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 13, 2022.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 13,
2022.

ADDRESSES: For material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this AD,
contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone
+49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website
at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD
docket at www.regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-0686.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at www.regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA-2022-0686; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, Large
Aircraft Section, FAA, International Validation Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2022-0013, dated January 25, 2022
(EASA AD 2022-0013) (also referred to as the MCAI), to correct an
unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS Model A350-941 airplanes.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR

part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus SAS Model A350-
941 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on June 17,
2022 (87 FR 36418). The NPRM was prompted by a report indicating that
following the introduction of the IFAR system on single lane slide-
rafts, the IFAR demonstrated inconsistent release behavior due to
interference or entanglement of the upper part of the IFAR with the
slide-raft cover or door structure in aft wind conditions. These
affected slide-rafts are installed at passenger door 3, left-hand and
right-hand sides. The NPRM proposed to require replacing an affected
part with a serviceable part, as specified in EASA AD 2022-0013. The
NPRM also proposed to prohibit the installation of affected parts.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address inconsistent release of
single lane slide-rafts having the IFAR system, which if not corrected,
could result in a slide-raft being unusable during an emergency and
impair the safe evacuation of occupants. See the MCAI for additional
background information.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received no comments on the NPRM or on the determination of
the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety
requires adopting this AD as proposed. Except for minor editorial
changes, this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None of the
changes will increase the economic burden on any operator. Accordingly,
the FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2022-0013 specifies procedures for replacing escape slide-
rafts having certain part numbers (affected parts) with serviceable
parts (which includes parts that have been modified and re-identified).
EASA AD 2022-0013 also prohibits the installation of affected parts on
any airplane. This material is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 30 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Labor cost                 Parts cost          Cost per product           Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 11 work-hours x $85 per hour =            $400  Up to $1,335................  Up to $40,050
 Up to $935.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the manufacturer, some or all of the costs of this AD
may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected operators. The FAA does not control warranty coverage for
affected operators. As a result, the FAA has included all known costs
in the cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2022-17-07 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-22145; Docket No. FAA-2022-0686;
Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00088-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective October 13, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus SAS Model A350-941 airplanes,
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/
furnishings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report indicating that the inflatable
free aisle restrictor (IFAR) on certain single lane slide-rafts
installed at passenger door 3, left-hand and right-hand sides,
demonstrated inconsistent release behavior in aft wind

conditions. The FAA is issuing this AD to address inconsistent
release of single lane slide-rafts having the IFAR system, which if
not corrected, could result in a slide-raft being unusable during an
emergency and impair the safe evacuation of occupants.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2022-0013, dated January 25, 2022 (EASA AD 2022-0013).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2022-0013

    (1) Where EASA AD 2022-0013 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2022-0013 does not apply
to this AD.

(i) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198,
telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2022-0013,
dated January 25, 2022.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For EASA AD 2022-0013, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on August 10, 2022.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-19278 Filed 9-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P