[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 52 (Friday, March 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 14900]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05712]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER21-1376-000]

Sanborn Solar 1A, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Sanborn Solar 1A, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure
    (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene
or protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is April 5, 2021.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 15, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-05712 Filed 3-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


DATE:		June 4, 2009

SUBJECT:	2008 Ozone Conformity NPRM

		Pre-proposal Meetings with External Stakeholder Organizations

	The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of
Transportation and Air Quality transportation staff-level conformity
team members met with the following external stakeholder organizations
to discuss the 2008 ozone conformity NPRM and to provide a status update
on the 2006 PM Amendments NPRM:

Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) – March 16, 2009

National Association of Regional Councils (NARC) – March 24, 2009

American Public Transportation Association (APTA) – March 24, 2009

Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations (AMPO) – March 25,
2009

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
(AASHTO) – March 25, 2009

National Association of Clean Air Agencies (NACAA) – March 30, 2009

Agenda for each meeting:

Purpose of Call;

Background for 2008 ozone NAAQS:

March 12, 2008 – EPA issued final rule on ground-level ozone NAAQS;

Transportation conformity for the 2008 ozone NAAQS would apply one year
after effective date of EPA’s final nonattainment designations.

Potential issues covered by this rulemaking:

Provide transportation conformity requirements for areas designated
nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.  These proposed changes include
the use of regional conformity tests in 2008 ozone areas, the use of
ozone budgets for other ozone NAAQS, and defining the baseline year;

Reorganize certain sections of the conformity rule to minimize future
rulemakings needed when new or revised NAAQS are issued.  We are
considering revisions to 40 CFR 93.109 and 93.119 of the conformity
rule, so that these provisions would apply to areas designated for new
or revised NAAQS in the future.

Discussion of rulemaking issues;

Status of conformity rulemaking for 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS areas.

Rulemaking issues discussed (staff-level ideas considered for proposal):

Proposal to restructure 40 CFR 93.109 to apply generally to all areas
designated for a new or revised NAAQS, rather than for each specific
NAAQS/pollutant;

Proposal to generalize baseline years in the baseline year interim
emissions test (40 CFR 93.119) for conformity purposes for any
NAAQS/pollutant;

Proposal to make required analysis years the same, regardless of whether
an area has an adequate or approved SIP budget or must use the interim
emissions test(s);

Use of interim emissions tests in 2008 ozone areas in lieu of older
ozone SIP budgets.

 PAGE

 PAGE   1


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 134 (Friday, July 14, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 45102-45106]
[FR Doc No: 2023-14880]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1650; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00210-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (Type
Certificate Previously Held by C Series Aircraft Limited Partnership
(CSALP); Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is revising a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that would have applied to certain Airbus Canada Limited Partnership
Model BD-500-1A11 airplanes. This action revises the NPRM by changing
the applicability. The FAA is proposing this airworthiness directive
(AD) to address the unsafe condition on these products. Since these
actions would impose an additional burden over those in the NPRM, the
FAA is requesting comments on this SNPRM.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this SNPRM by August 28, 2023.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-1650; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains the NPRM, this SNPRM, the mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For Transport Canada material that is proposed for
incorporation by reference in this SNPRM, contact Transport Canada,
Transport Canada National Aircraft Certification, 159 Cleopatra Drive,
Nepean, Ontario K1A 0N5, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected]; website
tc.canada.ca/en/aviation.
     For Airbus Canada Limited Partnership material that is
proposed for incorporation by reference in this SNPRM, contact Airbus
Canada Limited Partnership, 13100 Henri-Fabre Boulevard, Mirabel,
Qu[eacute]bec, J7N 3C6, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected]; website a220world.airbus.com.
     You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th Street, Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-1650.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Dzierzynski, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-1650; Project Identifier
MCAI-2022-00210-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each

substantive verbal contact received about this SNPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this SNPRM contain
commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as
private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this SNPRM, it is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked
submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed
in the public docket of this SNPRM. Submissions containing CBI should
be sent to Steven Dzierzynski, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the
public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    The FAA issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that
would apply to certain Airbus Canada Limited Partnership Model BD-500-
1A11 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on December
20, 2022 (87 FR 77763). The NPRM was prompted by AD CF-2022-04, dated
February 14, 2022, issued by Transport Canada, which is the aviation
authority for Canada (Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04). Transport Canada
AD CF-2022-04 states that the nose radome lightning diverter strips on
certain aircraft were painted in production; paint on the diverter
strips can compromise the nose radome lightning protection. Reduced
effectiveness of the diverter strips can lead to the puncture of the
nose radome by lightning and potential arc attachment to antennas,
structures, and other equipment in the area of the nose radome. The
unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in damage to the
localizer or glideslope antennas, and consequent loss of instrument
landing system localizer inputs or deviation information.
    In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require inspecting for paint on
the diverter strips on the nose radome, and replacing the nose radome
if necessary, as specified in a Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-1650.

Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued

    Since the FAA issued the NPRM, the FAA determined that the
applicability of the proposed AD should be revised. The FAA has
determined that the affected nose radomes may be installed as rotable
spares on airplanes outside of the applicability of the NPRM, thereby
subjecting those airplanes to the identified unsafe condition.
Therefore, this proposed AD has been expanded to apply to airplanes
equipped with nose radomes having specific part numbers and serial
numbers. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.

Comments

    The FAA received comments from one commenter, Delta Air Lines
(Delta). The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and
the FAA's response to each comment.

Request for Change to Applicability

    Delta requested the proposed applicability, which references the
applicability specified in Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04 that is based
on the airplane serial numbers, to be changed to the part numbers and
serial numbers of the nose radome listed in Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June
2, 2022. Delta stated the nose radome is a rotable component and can be
installed on any Model BD-500-1A11 airplanes.
    The FAA agrees with the request for the reason provided. The FAA
has revised the applicability in this proposed AD to specify airplanes
equipped with the specific part numbers and serial numbers of the nose
radome.

Request To Add Exception To Allow Use of Certain Service Information,
Along With Painting of the Nose Radome Prior to Installation

    Delta requested an exception be added to allow accomplishing Airbus
Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue
002, dated June 2, 2022, as an acceptable means of compliance with the
requirements of this proposed AD in lieu of Transport Canada AD CF-
2022-04, with the exception that the painting of the nose radome may be
accomplished prior to installation. Delta pointed out that Airbus
Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue
002, dated June 2, 2022, contains the correct Aircraft Structural
Repair Publication (ASRP) reference for painting of the nose radome as
opposed to Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin
BD500-538009, Issue 001, dated April 8, 2022. In addition, Delta
asserted that nose radomes are painted in the shop prior to
installation on the line, and that painting the nose radome after
installation, as detailed in Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220
Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June 2, 2022, does not
accommodate the regular maintenance procedure of the aircraft in
service. Delta further asserted that the work instructions of Airbus
Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue
002, dated June 2, 2022, comply with the intent of Transport Canada AD
CF-2022-04, since the discrepant nose radome is removed and an
airworthy replacement is installed.
    The FAA partially agrees. The FAA disagrees with revising this
proposed AD to add Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service
Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June 2, 2022, as an acceptable
method of compliance, because paragraph (h)(2) of this proposed AD
already provides it as an acceptable method of compliance. However, the
FAA agrees that painting of the nose radome may be accomplished prior
to installation. The painting of the nose radome after installation as
detailed in Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin
BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June 2, 2022, does not accommodate the
regular maintenance procedure of the aircraft in service. The work
instructions of Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin
BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June 2, 2022, meet the intent of
Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04, since the discrepant nose radome is
removed and an airworthy replacement is installed. Transport Canada and
Airbus Canada Partnership Limited have no objections to painting the
nose radome prior to installation. The FAA has added paragraph (h)(2)
to this proposed AD to allow painting of the nose radome before
installation.

Request for Definition Clarification

    Delta requested paragraph (j) of the proposed AD be revised to
clearly define ``refer to'' and ``in accordance with.'' Delta suggested
adding the following wording to paragraph (j) of this proposed AD
(paragraph (k) of this proposed AD): ``While performing corrective
actions per A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June
2, 2022, the words ``refer to'' are used and the operator has a

procedure accepted by the FAA the accepted alternative procedure can be
used. When the words ``in accordance with'' are used then the given
procedure must be followed.'' Delta reasoned that Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June
2, 2022, lists the maintenance procedures to accomplish the work
instructions as ``refer to.'' Since Delta has accomplished the repair
per the service bulletin, the verbiage ``refer to'' has been followed
allowing flexibility in the procedure to remove, install, and paint the
nose radomes utilizing other FAA approved methods.
    The FAA agrees to clarify. This proposed AD allows the use of
Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009,
Issue 002, dated June 2, 2022, in lieu of Transport Canada AD CF-2022-
04. The Procedure section of the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue
002, dated June 2, 2022, is Required for Compliance (RC) and must be
done to comply with this proposed AD, if the operator chooses to use
that service bulletin. If a step is marked RC and a procedure or
document must be followed to accomplish a task in a service bulletin,
the appropriate terminology to cite the procedure or document is ``in
accordance with.'' However, if a step is marked RC and a procedure or
document may be followed to accomplish an action (e.g., the design
approval holder's procedure or document may be used, but an FAA-
accepted procedure could also be used), the appropriate terminology to
use to cite the procedure or document is ``refer to . . . as an
accepted procedure.'' Therefore, if the actions are cited as ``refer
to,'' there is flexibility in the procedure to remove, install, and
paint utilizing other FAA-approved methods. The FAA has not changed
this proposed AD as a result of this comment.

Request for Repair Engineering Orders (REOs) To Be an Acceptable Method
of Compliance

    Delta requested that any REOs issued by Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership that are approved by a design approval organization (DAO)
be allowed as an acceptable method of compliance for paragraphs (h) and
(j) of the proposed AD (paragraphs (h) and (k) of this proposed AD).
Delta contended that the replacement of the nose radome or the
replacement or repair of the painted over diverter strips address the
unsafe condition of the proposed AD. Further, Delta asserted that the
replacement procedure utilized to replace the nose radome, or the
replacement or repair procedure utilized to repair a diverter strip is
not critical to resolve the unsafe condition. Delta pointed out that
the unsafe condition is resolved when the nose radome with painted over
diverter strips is removed from service regardless of the procedure.
    The FAA disagrees with giving automatic approvals for any REO
issued as a method of compliance within this proposed AD. REOs are
normally operator specific. The FAA does not consider it appropriate to
include various provisions in an AD applicable only to individual
airplane serial numbers or to a single operator's unique use of an
affected airplane. Once the final rule is published, any person may
request approval of an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) to use a
REO under the provisions of paragraph (k)(1) of this proposed AD. This
proposed AD has not been revised in this regard.

Request for Clarification To Allow Use of Additional Nose Radome
Assemblies

    Delta requested that the proposed AD be clarified to allow any
effective nose radome per the A220 Illustrated Parts Data Publication
(IPDP) BD500-A-J53-81-80-01AAA-941A or BD500-A-J53-81-80-02AAA-941A to
be installed as an acceptable unit during accomplishment of the actions
required by this proposed AD. Delta asserted that acceptable
replacement units are not detailed in Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04 or
Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009,
Issue 002, dated June 2, 2022; however, the service bulletin lists P/N
C01204101-009 as a spare. Delta stated that any other nose radome
listed in the IPDP provides the same level of safety.
    The FAA agrees that IPDP BD500-A-J53-81-80-01AAA-941A and BD500-A-
J53-81-80-02AAA-941A provide a more complete list of replacement nose
radome assemblies that may be used. The FAA added paragraph (h)(2) to
this proposed AD to allow use of nose radome assemblies P/N C01204101-
003, P/N C01204101-005, P/N C01204101-007, P/N C01204101-009, and P/N
C01204101-011.

Request for Credit Using Future Revisions of Certain Service
Information

    Delta requested credit for compliance with the requirements of the
proposed AD to be granted if accomplished using Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June
2, 2022, or future revisions.
    The FAA disagrees with providing credit for Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June
2, 2022. Paragraph (h)(2) of this proposed AD already allows the use of
Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009,
Issue 002, dated June 2, 2022, therefore, providing credit in this
proposed AD is not necessary.
    The FAA also disagrees with granting credit for accomplishing the
required actions using future revisions of Airbus Canada Limited
Partnership A220 Service Bulletin BD500-538009, because the FAA may not
refer to any document that does not yet exist in an AD. To allow
operators to use later revisions of the referenced document (issued
after publication of the AD), either the FAA must revise the AD to
reference specific later revisions, or operators must request approval
to use later revisions as an AMOC with the AD under the provisions of
paragraph (k)(1) of this proposed AD. This proposed AD has not been
revised in this regard.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04 specifies procedures for inspecting
for paint on the lightning diverter strips on the nose radome, and
replacing the nose radome if the lightning diverter strips are painted.
    The FAA also reviewed Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220
Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June 2, 2022. This
service information specifies procedures for inspecting for paint on
the lightning diverter strips on the nose radome, and replacing and
painting the nose radome if the lightning diverter strips are painted.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and
service information referenced above. The FAA is issuing this SNPRM
after determining that the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.
    Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM. As a

result, it is necessary to reopen the comment period to provide
additional opportunity for the public to comment on this SNPRM.

Proposed AD Requirements in This SNPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04 described previously, except for any
differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this
proposed AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04 by reference
in the FAA final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04 in its entirety through
that incorporation, except for any differences identified as exceptions
in the regulatory text of this proposed AD. Service information
required by Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04 for compliance will be
available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-1650 after the
FAA final rule is published.

Differences Between This SNPRM and the MCAI

    The applicability of Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04 applies to
specific serial numbered airplanes. The applicability of this SNPRM
applies to airplanes having a nose radome with specific part number and
serial number.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 7 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 work-hours x $85 per hour = $510...........................            $0 *             $510           $3,570
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the parts cost estimate for the nose radome
  replacement.

    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of
this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the
cost impact on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Airbus Canada Limited Partnership (Type Certificate Previously Held
by C Series Aircraft Limited Partnership (CSALP); Bombardier, Inc.):
Docket No. FAA-2022-1650; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00210-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by August 28, 2023.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Canada Limited Partnership Model BD-
500-1A11 airplanes, certificated in any category, with a nose radome
having part number (P/N) C01204101-007 or P/N C01204101-009 and a
serial number (S/N) S456997, S/N S570556, S/N S626945, S/N S866894,
S/N T099675, S/N T471773, or S/N T595935.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code: 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a report that the nose radome lightning
diverter strips on certain aircraft were painted in production;
paint on the diverter strips can compromise the nose radome
lightning protection. The FAA is issuing this AD to address reduced
effectiveness of the diverter strips, which can lead to the puncture
of the nose radome by lightning and potential arc attachment to
antennas, structures, and other equipment in the area of the nose
radome. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in
damage to the localizer or glideslope antennas, and consequent loss
of instrument landing system localizer inputs or deviation
information.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04, dated February 14,
2022 (Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04).

(h) Exception to Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04

    (1) Where Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04 refers to its effective
date, this AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04 specifies removing and
installing a nose radome using certain aircraft maintenance
publication data modules, this AD also allows accomplishing those
actions in accordance with Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220
Service Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June 2, 2022, with
the exception that the painting of the nose radome can be
accomplished prior to installation, and that the following nose
radome assembly part numbers may be used: P/N C01204101-003, P/N
C01204101-005, P/N C01204101-007, P/N C01204101-009, and P/N
C01204101-011.

(i) Parts Installation Limitation

    As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install, on
any airplane, a nose radome having P/N C01204101-003, P/N C01204101-
005, P/N C01204101-007, P/N C01204101-009, or P/N C01204101-011,
unless it has been inspected in accordance with paragraph (g) of
this AD.

(j) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective
date of this AD using Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service
Bulletin BD500-538009, Issue 001, dated April 8, 2022.

(k) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the International
Validation Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified
in paragraph (l)(1) of this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify
your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada; or Airbus Canada
Limited Partnership's Transport Canada Design Approval Organization
(DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-
authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (k)(2) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.

(l) Additional Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Steven
Dzierzynski, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].
    (2) For service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference is available at the addresses specified in
paragraphs (m)(3) and (4) of this AD.

(m) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Canada Limited Partnership A220 Service Bulletin
BD500-538009, Issue 002, dated June 2, 2022.
    (ii) Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04, dated February 14, 2022.
    (3) For Transport Canada AD CF-2022-04, contact Transport
Canada, Transport Canada National Aircraft Certification, 159
Cleopatra Drive, Nepean, Ontario K1A 0N5, Canada; telephone 888-663-
3639; email [email protected]; website tc.canada.ca/en/
aviation.
    (4) For Airbus Canada Limited Partnership material incorporated
by reference in this AD, contact Airbus Canada Limited Partnership,
13100 Henri-Fabre Boulevard, Mirabel, Qu[eacute]bec, J7N 3C6,
Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]; website
a220world.airbus.com.
    (5) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email [email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on July 8, 2023.
Michael Linegang,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.

[FR Doc. 2023-14880 Filed 7-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 190 (Tuesday, October 3, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 46103]
[FR Doc No: 2017-21160]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81734; File No. SR-BatsBZX-2017-50]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Extend the Implementation Date
For Certain Changes to Exchange Rules 14.11 and 14.12

September 27, 2017.
    On July 31, 2017, Bats BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 \1\ and Rule
19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to extend the
implementation date for certain changes to Exchange Rules 14.11 and
14.12 relating to continued listing standards for exchange-traded
products. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on August 18, 2017.\3\ The Commission received one
comment letter on the proposed rule change.\4\ On September 22, 2017,
the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-BatsBZX-2017-50).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81387 (August 14,
2017), 82 FR 39473.
    \4\ See letter from Jane Heinrichs, Associate General Counsel,
Investment Company Institute, to Brent J. Fields, Secretary,
Commission, dated September 1, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-21160 Filed 10-2-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: August 17, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 159)]
[Notices]
[Page 47535-47538]
[DOCID:fr17au06-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. NRTL1-93]

Wyle Laboratories, Inc.; Application for Renewal of Recognition

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the application of Wyle Laboratories,
Inc. (WL) for renewal of its recognition and presents the Agency's
preliminary finding to grant this request for renewal. This preliminary
finding does not constitute an interim or temporary approval of the
renewal application.

DATES: You must submit information or comments, or any request for
extension of the time to comment, by the following dates:
     Hard copy: postmarked or sent by September 1, 2006.
     Electronic transmission or facsimile: sent by September 1,
2006.

ADDRESSES: You may submit information or comments to this notice--
identified by docket number NRTL1-93--by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     OSHA Web site: http://ecomments.osha.gov. Follow the

instructions for submitting comments on OSHA's Web page.
     Fax: If your written comments are 10 pages or fewer, you
may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Regular mail, express delivery, hand delivery and courier
service: Submit three copies to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No.
NRTL1-93, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Room
N-2625, Washington, DC 20210; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. (OSHA's TTY
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>). OSHA Docket Office hours of operation are
8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., EST.
    Instructions: All comments received will be posted without change
to http://dockets.osha.gov, including any personal information

provided. OSHA cautions you about submitting personal information such
as social security numbers and birth dates.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://dockets.osha.gov. Contact the OSHA

Docket Office for information about materials not available through the
OSHA Web page and for assistance in using the Web page to locate docket
submissions.
    Extension of Comment Period: Submit requests for extensions
concerning this notice to the Office of Technical Programs and
Coordination Activities, NRTL Program, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210. Or fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Director, Office of Technical Programs
and Coordination Activities, NRTL Program, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Room N-3655, Washington, DC 20210, or phone (202) 693-
2110.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Notice of Renewal Application

    The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) hereby
gives notice that Wyle Laboratories, Inc. (WL) has applied for renewal
of its recognition as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory
(NRTL). The WL renewal request covers its existing scope of
recognition, except as noted below. OSHA's current scope of recognition
for WL may be found in the following informational Web page: http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/wl.html
.

    OSHA recognition of an NRTL signifies that the organization has met
the legal requirements in Section 1910.7 of Title 29, Code of Federal
Regulations (29 CFR 1910.7). Recognition is an acknowledgment that the
organization can perform independent safety testing and certification
of the specific products covered within its scope of recognition and is
not a delegation or grant of government authority. As a result of
recognition, employers may use products ``properly certified'' \1\ by
the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that require testing and certification.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Properly certified means, in part, that the product is
labeled or marked with the NRTL's ``registered'' certification mark
(i.e., the mark the NRTL uses for its NRTL work) and that the
product certification falls within the scope of recognition of the
NRTL.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Agency processes applications by an NRTL for initial
recognition or for expansion or renewal of this recognition following
requirements in Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This appendix requires
that the Agency publish two notices in the Federal Register in
processing an application. In the first notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides its preliminary finding and, in the second
notice, the Agency provides its final decision on the application.
These notices set forth the NRTL's scope of recognition or
modifications of that scope. We maintain an informational Web page for
each NRTL, which details its scope of recognition. These pages can be
accessed from our Web site at http://www.osha.gov/dts/otpca/nrtl/index.html
.

    The most recent notice published by OSHA specifically related to WL
recognition granted renewal of its NRTL status, which became effective
as noted below. However, OSHA issued a notice to modify the scope of a
number of NRTLs to replace or delete withdrawn test standards (70 FR
11273, March 8, 2005). WL was one of those NRTLs.
    The current address of the WL facility already recognized by OSHA
is: Wyle Laboratories, Inc., 7800 Highway 20 West, P.O. Box 077777,
Huntsville, AL 35807.

General Background on the Renewal Application

    Wyle Laboratories, Inc. (WL) initially received OSHA recognition as
a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory on July 22, 1994 (59 FR
37509) for a five-year period ending on July 22, 1999. Appendix A to 29
CFR 1910.7 stipulates that the period of recognition of an NRTL is five
years and that an NRTL may renew its recognition by applying not less
than nine months, nor more than one year, before the expiration date of
its current recognition. NRTLs submitting requests within this allotted
time period retain their recognition during OSHA's renewal process. WL
submitted the required request and received its first renewal of
recognition on June 28, 2000 (65 FR 39949), for the five-year period
ending June 28, 2005. Wyle has submitted a request dated September 17,
2004 (see Exhibit 19-1) to renew its recognition again. This request
falls within the allotted time period, and Wyle retains its recognition
pending OSHA's final decision in this renewal process. WL later amended
its request to delete certain test standards from its scope (see
Exhibit 19-2), which have not been included in the listing of test
standards shown below. In connection with the renewal, OSHA staff
performed an on-site visit of the NRTL's site in February 2005. Based
upon the on-site visit, the assessor recommended renewal of the WL
recognition in a memo dated February 1, 2006 (see Exhibit 19-3).
Processing of the renewal request has been delayed through no fault of
the NRTL.
    WL seeks renewal of its recognition for the one site that OSHA
currently includes within the NRTL's scope. WL also seeks renewal of
its recognition for continued testing and certification of products for
demonstration of conformance to the following test standards:

UL 8 Water Based Agent Fire Extinguishers
UL 20 General-Use Snap Switches
UL 22 Amusement and Gaming Machines

UL 44 Thermoset-Insulated Wires and Cables
UL 45 Portable Electric Tools
UL 48 Electric Signs
UL 62 Flexible Cord and Fixture Wire
UL 65 Wired Cabinets
UL 67 Panelboards
UL 73 Motor-Operated Appliances
UL 83 Thermoplastic-Insulated Wires and Cables
UL 92 Fire Extinguisher and Booster Hose
UL 98 Enclosed and Dead-Front Switches
UL 153 Portable Electric Luminaires
UL 154 Carbon-Dioxide Fire Extinguishers
UL 187 X-Ray Equipment
UL 244A Solid-State Controls for Appliances
UL 299 Dry Chemical Fire Extinguishers
UL 363 Knife Switches
UL 393 Indicating Pressure Gauges for Fire-Protection Service
UL 429 Electrically Operated Valves
UL 444 Communications Cables
UL 466 Electric Scales
UL 467 Grounding and Bonding Equipment
UL 484 Room Air Conditioners
UL 486B Wire Connectors
UL 486C Splicing Wire Connectors
UL 486D Sealed Wire Connector Systems
UL 489 Molded-Case Circuit Breakers, Molded-Case Switches, and Circuit-
Breaker Enclosures
UL 497A Secondary Protectors for Communications Circuits
UL 498 Attachment Plugs and Receptacles
UL 499 Electric Heating Appliances
UL 506 Specialty Transformers
UL 507 Electric Fans
UL 508 Industrial Control Equipment
UL 510 Polyvinyl Chloride, Polyethylene and Rubber Insulating Tape
UL 512 Fuseholders
UL 539 Single and Multiple Station Heat Alarms
UL 541 Refrigerated Vending Machines
UL 544 Medical and Dental Equipment
UL 626 Water Fire Extinguishers
UL 711 Rating and Fire Testing of Fire Extinguishers
UL 745-1 Portable Electric Tools
UL 745-2-1 Particular Requirements of Drills
UL 745-2-2 Particular Requirements for Screwdrivers and Impact Wrenches
UL 745-2-3 Particular Requirements for Grinders, Polishers, and Disk-
Type Sanders
UL 745-2-4 Particular Requirements for Sanders
UL 745-2-5 Particular Requirements for Circular Saws and Circular
Knives
UL 745-2-6 Particular Requirements for Hammers
UL 745-2-8 Particular Requirements for Shears and Nibblers
UL 745-2-9 Particular Requirements for Tappers
UL 745-2-11 Particular Requirements for Reciprocating Saws
UL 745-2-12 Particular Requirements for Concrete Vibrators
UL 745-2-14 Particular Requirements for Planers
UL 745-2-17 Particular Requirements for Routers and Trimmers
UL 745-2-30 Particular Requirements for Staplers
UL 745-2-31 Particular Requirements for Diamond Core Drills
UL 745-2-32 Particular Requirements for Magnetic Drill Presses
UL 745-2-33 Particular Requirements for Portable Bandsaws
UL 745-2-34 Particular Requirements for Strapping Tools
UL 745-2-35 Particular Requirements for Drain Cleaners
UL 745-2-36 Particular Requirements for Hand Motor Tools
UL 745-2-37 Particular Requirements for Plate Jointers
UL 796 Printed-Wiring Boards
UL 813 Commercial Audio Equipment
UL 817 Cord Sets and Power-Supply Cords
UL 845 Motor Control Centers
UL 854 Service-Entrance Cables
UL 863 Time-Indicating and -Recording Appliances
UL 916 Energy Management Equipment
UL 917 Clock-Operated Switches
UL 924 Emergency Lighting and Power Equipment
UL 943 Ground-Fault Circuit-Interrupters
UL 961 Electric Hobby and Sports Equipment
UL 977 Fused Power-Circuit Devices
UL 998 Humidifiers
UL 1004 Electric Motors
UL 1008 Transfer Switch Equipment
UL 1012 Power Units Other Than Class 2
UL 1018 Electric Aquarium Equipment
UL 1022 Line Isolation Monitors
UL 1028 Hair Clipping and Shaving Appliances
UL 1047 Isolated Power Systems Equipment
UL 1053 Ground-Fault Sensing and Relaying Equipment
UL 1054 Special-Use Switches
UL 1058 Halogenated Agent Extinguishing System Units
UL 1059 Terminal Blocks
UL 1066 Low-Voltage AC and DC Power Circuit Breakers Used in Enclosures
UL 1069 Hospital Signaling and Nurse-Call Equipment
UL 1077 Supplementary Protectors for Use in Electrical Equipment
UL 1091 Butterfly Valves for Fire-Protection Service
UL 1093 Halogenated Agent Fire Extinguishers
UL 1097 Double Insulation Systems for Use in Electrical Equipment
UL 1236 Battery Chargers for Charging Engine-Starter Batteries
UL 1244 Electrical and Electronic Measuring and Testing Equipment
UL 1254 Pre-Engineered Dry Chemical Extinguishing System Units
UL 1283 Electromagnetic Interference Filters
UL 1310 Class 2 Power Units
UL 1411 Transformers and Motor Transformers for Use in Audio-, Radio-,
and Television-Type Appliances
UL 1412 Fusing Resistors and Temperature-Limited Resistors for Radio-
and Television-Type Appliances
UL 1416 Overcurrent and Overtemperature Protectors for Radio- and
Television-Type Appliances
UL 1424 Cables for Power-Limited Fire-Alarm Circuits
UL 1429 Pullout Switches
UL 1437 Electrical Analog Instruments--Panel Board Types
UL 1449 Transient Voltage Surge Suppressors
UL 1474 Adjustable Drop Nipples for Sprinkler Systems
UL 1481 Power Supplies for Fire-Protective Signaling Systems
UL 1486 Quick Opening Devices for Dry Pipe Valves for Fire-Protection
Service
UL 1557 Electrically Isolated Semiconductor Devices
UL 1564 Industrial Battery Chargers
UL 1577 Optical Isolators
UL 1585 Class 2 and Class 3 Transformers
UL 1598 Luminaires
UL 1664 Immersion-Detection Circuit-Interrupters
UL 1673 Electric Space Heating Cables
UL 1682 Plugs, Receptacles, and Cable Connectors of the Pin and Sleeve
Type
UL 1778 Uninterruptible Power Systems
UL 1863 Communications-Circuit Accessories
UL 1876 Isolating Signal and Feedback Transformers for Use in
Electronic Equipment
UL 1995 Heating and Cooling Equipment
UL 2006 Halon 1211 Recovery/Recharge Equipment
UL 2111 Overheating Protection for Motors
UL 60950 Information Technology Equipment

UL 61010A-1 Electrical Equipment For Laboratory Use; Part 1: General
Requirements \*\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \*\ This standard is not presently in WL's scope of recognition
but is comparable to UL 1262 Laboratory Equipment, which is in WL's
scope but has been withdrawn by the standards developing
organization. OSHA must delete a withdrawn standard from the scope
of recognition of any NRTL because, once it has been withdrawn, a
standard no longer meets the requirements for an ``appropriate test
standard'' under 29 CFR 1910.7(c). In such cases, OSHA NRTL Program
policy permits NRTLs to request, or OSHA to provide, recognition for
comparable test standards, i.e., other appropriate test standards
covering comparable product testing. In this notice, OSHA has
deleted UL 1262 from the list above and added UL 61010A-1, in
accordance with this policy. In the final notice for WL's expansion,
OSHA would not only formally delete UL 1262 from the scope of
recognition of WL but also from the scope of any other NRTL still
recognized for this standard. OSHA would also add UL 61010A-1 to the
scope of those NRTLs and to WL's scope.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

UL 61010B-1 Electrical Measuring and Test Equipment; Part 1: General
Requirements
    The designations and titles of the above test standards were
current at the time of the preparation of this notice.
    OSHA's recognition of WL, or any NRTL, for a particular test
standard is limited to equipment or materials (i.e., products) for
which OSHA standards require third-party testing and certification
before use in the workplace. Consequently, if a test standard also
covers any product(s) for which OSHA does not require such testing and
certification, an NRTL's scope of recognition does not include that
product(s).
    Many UL test standards also are approved as American National
Standards by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). However,
for convenience, we use the designation of the standards developing
organization for the standard as opposed to the ANSI designation. Under
our procedures, any NRTL recognized for an ANSI-approved test standard
may use either the latest proprietary version of the test standard or
the latest ANSI version of that standard. You may contact ANSI to find
out whether or not a test standard is currently ANSI-approved.

Programs and Procedures

    The renewal would include continued use by WL of the following
supplemental programs, all of which are currently in its scope.
    Program 2: Acceptance of testing data from independent
organizations, other than NRTLs.
    Program 3: Acceptance of product evaluations from independent
organizations, other than NRTLs.
    Program 4: Acceptance of witnessed testing data.
    Program 5: Acceptance of testing data from non-independent
organizations.
    Program 6: Acceptance of evaluation data from non-independent
organizations (requiring NRTL review prior to marketing).
    Program 7: Acceptance of continued certification following minor
modifications by the client.
    Program 8: Acceptance of product evaluations from organizations
that function as part of the International Electrotechnical Commission
Certification Body (IEC-CB) Scheme.
    Program 9: Acceptance of services other than testing or evaluation
performed by subcontractors or agents.
    In developing these programs, OSHA responded to industry requests
and allowed certain of their ongoing practices to continue but in a
manner controlled by OSHA criteria. In this sense, they are special
conditions that the Agency places on an NRTL's recognition. OSHA does
not consider these programs in determining whether an NRTL meets the
requirements for recognition under 29 CFR 1910.7. However, these
programs help to define the scope of that recognition.

Preliminary Finding on the Renewal

    WL has submitted an acceptable request for renewal of its
recognition as an NRTL. Our review of the application file, the
assessor's memo, and other pertinent documents, indicates that WL can
meet the requirements, as prescribed by 29 CFR 1910.7, for the renewal
of the one site and the test standards and programs listed above. This
preliminary finding does not constitute an interim or temporary
approval of the application.
    OSHA welcomes public comments, in sufficient detail, as to whether
WL has met the requirements of 29 CFR 1910.7 for the renewal of its
recognition as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory. Your
comments should consist of pertinent written documents and exhibits.
Should you need more time to comment, you must request it in writing,
including reasons for the request. OSHA must receive your written
request for extension at the address provided above no later than the
last date for comments. OSHA will limit any extension to 30 days,
unless the requester justifies a longer period. We may deny a request
for extension if it is not adequately justified. You may obtain or
review copies of the Wyle request, the on-site review report, other
pertinent documents, and all submitted comments, as received, by
contacting the Docket Office, Room N-2625, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, at the above address.
Docket No. NRTL1-93 contains all materials in the record concerning the
WL application.
    The NRTL Program staff will review all timely comments and, after
resolution of issues raised by these comments, will recommend whether
to grant the WL renewal request. The Assistant Secretary will make the
final decision on granting the renewal and, in making this decision,
may undertake other proceedings that are prescribed in Appendix A to 29
CFR 1910.7. OSHA will publish a public notice of this final decision in
the Federal Register.

    Signed at Washington, DC this 9th day of August, 2006.
Edwin G. Foulke, Jr.,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-13543 Filed 8-16-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 31 (Friday, February 14, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 8955]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03201]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-438-000.
    Applicants: Chandeleur Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Petition for approval of Settlement of Chandeleur Pipe
Line Company.
    Filed Date: 2/3/14.
    Accession Number: 20140203-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/24/14.

    Reply Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/6/14.
    Docket Numbers: RP14-439-000.
    Applicants: Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Retainage Calculation Revision to be effective 3/6/
2014.
    Filed Date: 2/3/14.
    Accession Number: 20140203-5138.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-440-000.
    Applicants: TC Offshore LLC.
    Description: New Negotiated Rates Section to be effective 2/1/2014.
    Filed Date: 2/3/14.
    Accession Number: 20140203-5219.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/14.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-441-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Neg Rate 2014-02-03 BP Energy to be effective 2/1/
2014.
    Filed Date: 2/4/14.
    Accession Number: 20140204-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 2/18/14.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified date(s). Protests may be considered,
but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 4, 2014.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-03201 Filed 2-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23595-23597]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08176]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2023-0965; Airspace Docket No. 23-AGL-8]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of VOR Federal Airways V-158 and V-172; Polo, IL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Very High Frequency (VHF)
Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal airways V-158 and V-172 in the
vicinity of Polo, IL. The amendments are due to the planned
decommissioning of the VOR portion of the Polo, IL (PLL), VOR/Distance
Measuring Equipment (VOR/DME) navigational aid (NAVAID). The Polo VOR
is being decommissioned as part of the FAA's VOR Minimum Operational
Network (MON) program.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 2, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by FAA Docket No. FAA-2023-0965 and
Airspace Docket No. 23-AGL-8 using any of the following methods:
    * Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.
    * Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    * Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
    * Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. You may also contact the Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify the National Airspace System (NAS) as
necessary to preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic.

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal. The most
helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain
the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should submit only one time if comments are filed electronically, or
commenters should send only one copy of written comments if comments
are filed in writing.
    The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments it receives on or before
the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed
after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without
incurring

expense or delay. The FAA may change this proposal in light of the
comments it receives.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

Availability of Rulemaking Documents

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Operations office (see ADDRESSES section for address, phone number, and
hours of operations). An informal docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the office of the Operations Support Group,
Central Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177.

Incorporation by Reference

    VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order
JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 on an annual basis. This
document proposes to amend the current version of that order, FAA Order
JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022.
These updates would be published in the next update to FAA Order JO
7400.11. That order is publicly available as listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this document.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting points.

Background

    The FAA is planning to decommission the VOR portion of the Polo,
IL, VOR/DME in January 2024. The Polo VOR is one of the candidate VORs
identified for discontinuance by the FAA's VOR MON program and listed
in the Final policy statement notice, ``Provision of Navigation
Services for the Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen)
Transition to Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) (Plan for Establishing
a VOR Minimum Operational Network),'' published in the Federal Register
on July 26, 2016 (81 FR 48694), Docket No. FAA-2011-1082.
    Although the VOR portion of the Polo, IL, VOR/DME NAVAID is planned
for decommissioning, the co-located DME portion of the NAVAID is being
retained to support NextGen PBN flight procedure requirements.
    The VOR Federal airways affected by the Polo VOR decommissioning
are V-158 and V-172. With the planned decommissioning of the Polo VOR,
the remaining ground-based NAVAID coverage in the area is insufficient
to enable the continuity of the affected airways. As such, the proposed
modifications to V-158 and V-172 would result in the airways being
shortened due to the loss of the segments supported by the Polo VOR.
    To address these proposed modifications, instrument flight rules
(IFR) traffic could use adjacent VOR Federal airways V-6, V-24, V-216,
and V-228 or receive air traffic control (ATC) radar vectors to fly
around or through the affected area. Additionally, pilots equipped with
RNAV capabilities could also use Area Navigation (RNAV) routes T-265,
T-302, T-325, and T-354 or navigate point to point using the existing
fixes that would remain in place to support continued operations though
the affected area. Visual flight rules (VFR) pilots who elect to
navigate via the affected VOR Federal airways could also take advantage
of the adjacent ATS routes or ATC services listed previously.
    Prior to this NPRM, the FAA published a rule for Docket No. FAA-
2022-1395 in the Federal Register (88 FR 18023; March 27, 2023)
amending V-172 by removing the airway segment between the North Platte,
NE, VOR/DME and the Columbus, NE, VOR/DME NAVAIDs. The V-172 airway
amendment will be effective June 15, 2023, and is reflected in this
action.
    Currently, the description of V-158 includes an exclusion for
restricted area R-3302; however, the FAA revoked that restricted area
in 2000. (65 FR 49483; August 14, 2000). The proposed change updates
the V-158 description by removing the obsolete reference to R-3302.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 by amending VOR
Federal airways V-158 and V-172 due to the planned decommissioning of
the VOR portion of the Polo, IL, VOR/DME. The proposed airway actions
are described below.
    V-158: V-158 currently extends between the Mason City, IA, VOR/DME
and the intersection of the Polo, IL, VOR/DME 122[deg] and Davenport,
IA, VOR/Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) 087[deg] radials (SHOOF Fix).
The FAA proposes to remove the airway segment between the Dubuque, IA,
VORTAC and the intersection of the Polo, IL, 122[deg] and Davenport,
IA, 087[deg] radials (SHOOF Fix). As amended, the airway would be
changed to extend between the Mason City VOR/DME and the Dubuque
VORTAC.
    V-172: V-172 currently extends between the Columbus, NE, VOR/DME
and the DuPage, IL, VOR/DME. The FAA proposes to remove the airway
segment between the Cedar Rapids, IA, VOR/DME and the DuPage, IL, VOR/
DME. As amended, the airway would be changed to extend between the
Columbus VOR/DME and the Cedar Rapids VOR/DME.
    The NAVAID radials contained in the VOR Federal airway descriptions
below are unchanged and stated in degrees True north.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration

proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19,
2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways.

* * * * *

V-158 [Amended]

    From Mason City, IA; INT Mason City 106[deg] and Dubuque, IA,
293[deg] radials; to Dubuque.
* * * * *

V-172 [Amended]

    From Columbus, NE; Omaha, IA; INT Omaha 066[deg] and Newton, IA,
262[deg] radials; Newton; Cedar Rapids, IA.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 12, 2023.
Brian Konie,
Acting Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2023-08176 Filed 4-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 116 (Monday, June 17, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 36215-36216]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14267]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2013-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1321]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Comments are requested on proposed flood hazard
determinations, which may include additions or modifications of any
Base Flood Elevation (BFE), base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area
(SFHA) boundary or zone designation, or regulatory floodway on the
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs), and where applicable, in the
supporting Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports for the communities
listed in the table below. The purpose of this notice is to seek
general information and comment regarding the preliminary FIRM, and
where applicable, the FIS report that the Federal Emergency Management
Agency (FEMA) has provided to the affected communities. The FIRM and
FIS report are the basis of the floodplain management measures that the
community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of having in
effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). In addition, the FIRM and FIS
report, once effective, will be used by insurance agents and others to
calculate appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings
and the contents of those buildings.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before September 16, 2013.

ADDRESSES: The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, the FIS report
for each community are available for inspection at both the online
location and the respective Community Map Repository address listed in
the tables below. Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS
report for each community are accessible online through the FEMA Map
Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.
    You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-1321, to
Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance
and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FEMA proposes to make flood hazard
determinations for each community listed below, in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed flood hazard determinations, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be

construed to mean that the community must change any existing
ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain management
requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter requirements
of its own or pursuant to policies established by other Federal, State,
or regional entities. These flood hazard determinations are used to
meet the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and also are
used to calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new
buildings built after the FIRM and FIS report become effective.
    The communities affected by the flood hazard determinations are
provided in the tables below. Any request for reconsideration of the
revised flood hazard information shown on the Preliminary FIRM and FIS
report that satisfies the data requirements outlined in 44 CFR 67.6(b)
is considered an appeal. Comments unrelated to the flood hazard
determinations also will be considered before the FIRM and FIS report
become effective.
    Use of a Scientific Resolution Panel (SRP) is available to
communities in support of the appeal resolution process. SRPs are
independent panels of experts in hydrology, hydraulics, and other
pertinent sciences established to review conflicting scientific and
technical data and provide recommendations for resolution. Use of the
SRP only may be exercised after FEMA and local communities have been
engaged in a collaborative consultation process for at least 60 days
without a mutually acceptable resolution of an appeal. Additional
information regarding the SRP process can be found online at http://floodsrp.org/pdfs/srp_fact_sheet.pdf.
    The watersheds and/or communities affected are listed in the tables
below. The Preliminary FIRM, and where applicable, FIS report for each
community are available for inspection at both the online location and
the respective Community Map Repository address listed in the tables.
Additionally, the current effective FIRM and FIS report for each
community are accessible online through the FEMA Map Service Center at
www.msc.fema.gov for comparison.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Community map repository
               Community                             address
------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Cloud County, Kansas, and Incorporated Areas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Maps Available for Inspection Online at: www.fema.gov/preliminaryfloodhazarddata preliminaryfloodhazarddata
------------------------------------------------------------------------
City of Clyde..........................  City Hall, 412 Washington
                                          Street, Clyde, KS 66938.
City of Concordia......................  City Hall, 701 Washington
                                          Street, Concordia, KS 66901.
City of Glasco.........................  City Hall, 206 East Main
                                          Street, Glasco, KS 67445.
City of Jamestown......................  City Hall, 300 Walnut Street,
                                          Jamestown, KS 66948.
City of Miltonvale.....................  City Hall, 107 Starr Avenue,
                                          Miltonvale, KS 67466.
Unincorporated Areas of Cloud County...  Cloud County Courthouse, 811
                                          Washington Street, Concordia,
                                          KS 66901.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

     Dated: June 3, 2013.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013-14267 Filed 6-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 221 (Thursday, November 15, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 57467-57468]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24872]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP19-11-000, PF18-3-000]

Sabine Pass LNG, L.P.; Notice of Application

    Take notice that on October 29, 2018, Sabine Pass LNG, L.P.
(SPLNG), 700 Milam Street, Suite 1900, Houston, Texas 77002, filed an
application under section 3(a) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part
153 and 380 of the Commission's regulations, seeking authorization to
site, construct and operate an expansion of the existing Sabine Pass
liquefied natural gas (LNG) facility (SPLNG Terminal), located in
Cameron Parish, Louisiana on the Sabine Pass Channel. The proposed
expansion of the SPLNG Terminal consists of the addition of a third
marine berth (Third Berth) and supporting facilities (SPLNG Third Berth
Expansion Project), all as more fully set forth in the application
which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The
filing may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at [email protected] or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions regarding the application should be directed to Karri
Mahmoud, Cheniere Energy, Inc., 700 Milam Street, Suite 1900, Houston,
TX 77002, or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email at
[email protected].
    On March 8, 2018 the Commission granted SPLNG's request to utilize
the Pre-Filing Process and assigned Docket No. PF18-3-000 to staff
activities involved in the Project. Now, as of the filing of the
October 29, 2018 application, the Pre-Filing Process for this Project
has ended. From this time forward, this proceeding will be conducted in
Docket No. CP19-11-000 as noted in the caption of this Notice.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules (18 CFR 157.9),
within 90 days of this Notice, the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this
proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for
this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of
the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the
subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days
of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list

maintained by the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies
of all documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A
party must submit 3 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the
Commission and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other
party. Only parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of
Commission orders in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list and will be
notified of any meetings associated with the Commission's environmental
review process. Environmental commentors will not be required to serve
copies of filed documents on all other parties. However, the non-party
commentors will not receive copies of all documents filed by other
parties or issued by the Commission and will not have the right to seek
court review of the Commission's final order.
    As of the February 27, 2018 date of the Commission's order in
Docket No. CP16-4-001, the Commission will apply its revised practice
concerning out-of-time motions to intervene in any new Natural Gas Act
section 3 or section 7 proceeding.\1\ Persons desiring to become a
party to a certificate proceeding are to intervene in a timely manner.
If seeking to intervene out-of-time, the movant is required to ``show
good cause why the time limitation should be waived,'' and should
provide justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule
214(d)(1) of the Commission's Rules and Regulations.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C., 162 FERC ]61,167 at
]50 (2018).
    \2\ 18 CFR 385.214(d)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 3 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426.
    Comment Date: November 28, 2018.

    Dated: November 7, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-24872 Filed 11-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 84 (Tuesday, May 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 25774]
[FR Doc No: 2012-10568]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[File No. 500-1]

 Order of Suspension of Trading; In the Matter of Berman Center,
Inc., Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems, Inc., and Java Detour,
Inc.

 April 27, 2012.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Berman Center, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended December 31, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Cyberkinetics Neurotechnology Systems, Inc. because it has not filed
any periodic reports since the period ended June 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Java Detour, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports since
the period ended September 30, 2009.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on April 27, 2012, through 11:59 p.m.
EDT on May 10, 2012.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-10568 Filed 4-27-12; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 106 (Friday, June 1, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32623-32624]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13276]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 3939-022]

City of Denton; Notice of Application Accepted for Filing,
Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Types of Application: Surrender of License.
    b. Project Nos.: 3939-022.
    c. Date Filed: October 11, 2011.
    d. Applicants: City of Denton.
    e. Name of Projects: Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project is located on the Elm Fork of the Trinity
River, in Denton County, Texas, occupying lands of the United States
and utilizing a dam and reservoir constructed and operated by the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers. The nearest town is Aubrey, Texas.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a-825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Tim Fisher, Assistant Director of Water
Utilities,
    901-A Texas Street, Denton, Texas 26209,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Mr. Anthony DeLuca,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and
protests, is 30 days from the issuance date of this notice. All
documents may be filed electronically via the Internet. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's web site
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. If unable to be filed
electronically, documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an
original and seven copies should be mailed to: Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426. Commenters can submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters,
without prior registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and
contact information at the end of your comments.
    Please include the project numbers (P-3939-022) on any comments,
motions, or recommendations filed.
    k. Description of Request: The applicant proposes to surrender the
license for the Ray Roberts Hydroelectric Project. The applicant states
they decided to withdraw from the power generation business because it
became more economical and operationally less complex for the City to
purchase its power needs rather than to generate power itself. At the
same time, the City's water department saw potential value in the
Project facilities to provide an improved low-flow release system for
the City's water treatment plant.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits
in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via email of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filing must (1)
Bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or
``MOTION TO INTERVENE'' as applicable; (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person protesting or intervening; and (4) otherwise
comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests must set forth their
evidentiary

basis and otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). All
comments, motions to intervene, or protests should relate to project
works which are the subject of the license surrender. Agencies may
obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant. A copy of
any protest or motion to intervene must be served upon each
representative of the applicant specified in the particular
application. If an intervener files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy of all other
filings in reference to this application must be accompanied by proof
of service on all persons listed in the service list prepared by the
Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b) and
385.2010.

    Dated: May 25, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-13276 Filed 5-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P