[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 102 (Wednesday, May 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31775-31776]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11314]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004; FRL-10008-43]

Access to Confidential Business Information by Access
Interpreting, Inc.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has authorized its contractor, Access Interpreting, Inc.
of Washington, DC, to access information which has been submitted to
EPA under all sections of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). Some
of the information may be claimed or determined to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI).

DATES: Access to the confidential data will occur no sooner than June
3, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical information contact:
Scott Sherlock, Environmental Assistance Division (7408M), Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(202) 564-8257; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill,
422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202)
554-1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may,
however, be of interest to all who manufacture, process, or distribute
industrial chemicals. Since other entities may also be interested, the
Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may
be affected by this action.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPPT-2003-0004, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics
Docket (OPPT Docket), Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center
(EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPPT Docket is (202) 566-
0280. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information
about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What action is the Agency taking?

    Under GSA/FEDSIM solicitation number GS-10F-0372X, task order
number 68HE0H18A0005/P00003, contractor Access Interpreting, Inc. of
1100 H Street NW, Suite 440, Washington, DC, is assisting the Office of
Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) by attending meetings discussing
TSCA CBI and interpret for staff requiring American Sign Language (ASL)
interpretation. The contractors are American Sign Language
interpreters.
    In accordance with 40 CFR 2.306(j), EPA has determined that under
GSA/FEDSIM solicitation number GS-10F-0372X, task order number
68HE0H18A0005/P00003, Access Interpreting, Inc. required access to CBI
submitted to EPA under all sections of TSCA to perform successfully the
duties specified under the contract. Access Interpreting, Inc.
personnel were given access to information submitted to EPA under all
sections of TSCA. Some of the information may be claimed or determined
to be CBI.
    EPA is issuing this notice to inform all submitters of information
under all sections of TSCA that EPA has provided Access Interpreting,
Inc. access to these CBI materials on a need-to-know basis only. All
access to TSCA CBI under this contract is taking place at EPA
Headquarters in accordance with EPA's TSCA CBI Protection Manual.
    Access to TSCA data, including CBI, will continue until September
30, 2023. If the contract is extended, this access will also continue
for the duration of the extended contract without further notice.
    Access Interpreting, Inc. personnel have signed nondisclosure
agreements and were briefed on appropriate security procedures before
they were permitted access to TSCA CBI.

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.

    Dated: May 19, 2020.
Pamela Myrick,
Director, Information Management Division, Office of Pollution
Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2020-11314 Filed 5-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: October 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 203)]
[Notices]
[Page 65054-65056]
[DOCID:fr21oc10-98]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0137; Notice 1]

General Motors, LLC, Receipt of Petition for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance

    General Motors, LLC (GM),\1\ has determined that certain 2008
through 2010 Model Year Chevrolet Malibu passenger cars equipped with
automatic transmissions and manufactured between May 2007 through March
2010 do not fully meet the requirements of paragraph S<IP_ADDRESS> of
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 102, Transmission
Shift Position Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission Braking
Effect. GM filed an appropriate report pursuant to 49 CFR part 573
Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports, dated March 30,
2010.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ General Motors, LLC (GM) is a Michigan corporation that
manufactures motor vehicles.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) (see implementing rule
at 49 CFR part 556), GM has petitioned for an exemption from the
notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the
basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle
safety.
    This notice of receipt of GM's petition is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or
other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
    A total of 462,227 \2\ model year 2008, 2009 and 2010 Chevrolet
Malibu passenger cars manufactured during the period May 2007 through
March 2010 are potentially affected by the subject noncompliance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ GM's petition, which was filed under 49 CFR part 556,
requests an agency decision to exempt GM from the notification and
recall responsibilities of 49 CFR part 573 for as many as 462,227 of
the affected vehicles. However, the agency cannot relieve GM's
distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for
sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate
commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after GM
recognized that the subject noncompliance existed. Those vehicles
must be brought into conformance, exported, or destroyed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Paragraph S<IP_ADDRESS> of FMVSS No. 102 requires:

    Except as specified in S<IP_ADDRESS>, if the transmission shift
position sequence includes a park position, identification of shift
positions, including the positions in relation to each other and the
position selected, shall be displayed in view of the driver whenever
any of the following conditions exist:
    (a) The ignition is in a position where the transmission can be
shifted; or

    (b) The transmission is not in park.

    GM described the noncompliance as the absence of the required
transmission shift position display for a certain ignition key cylinder
position. GM explained that while the key is in the ignition there is a
narrow ignition key cylinder position between the ``ACC'' and ``OFF''
positions within which the transmission shift lever can be moved and
the indicator light that illuminates the transmission shift position
display is inoperative. The Company added that this noncompliance only
occurs when the engine is not running.
    GM additionally stated that in all other ignition activation and
operation positions, all of the subject vehicles comply with paragraph
S<IP_ADDRESS> of FMVSS No. 102.
    GM argued its belief that the subject noncompliance is
inconsequential to motor vehicle safety because:

    As NHTSA recognized in proposing the standard (49 FR 32409-32411
(August 25, 1988)), the purpose of the display requirement for PRNDM
information is to ``provide the driver with transmission position
information for the vehicle conditions where such information can
reduce the likelihood of shifting errors.'' Thus, in all but the
rarest circumstances, the primary function of the PRNDM display is
to inform the driver of gear selection and relative position of the
gears while the engine is running. All of the subject vehicles
display PRNDM information whenever the ignition switch is in the
``On'' or ``Run'' position.
    With the exception of the absence of the required transmission
shift position display for one narrow ignition key cylinder
position, the system meets all other applicable requirements of
FMVSS No. 102.
    GM has no record of any incidents, injuries, owner complaints or
field reports related to this noncompliance. GM added that if a
customer reports this problem to them and requests a remedy, the
Company will replace the ignition switch with a conforming
component.
    Since this noncompliance only occurs during an atypical
operation, the noncompliance is not likely to occur under normal
driving conditions. The only circumstance where the noncompliance
would appear is if the ignition switch is in the intermediary
position between the ``OFF'' and ``ACC'' detent positions prior to
the interlock. In order for this condition to be present, a driver
would have to first move the transmission control to ``PARK.'' In
such a case, there are two possible scenarios for the driver: 1)
leaving the vehicle with the key in the ignition or 2) remaining in
the vehicle. GM provides the following analysis for both scenarios:
    1. The driver exits the vehicle while leaving the key in the
ignition:
    If the driver attempted to remove the key before exiting the
vehicle, the key would not be capable of removal. The doors may also
still be locked if they are in the factory default setting to unlock
in the ``PARK'' position.
    As required by S5.1.3 of FMVSS 114, GM provides an audible
warning to the driver that activates whenever the key has been left
in the ignition locking system and the driver's door is opened.
    The Owner's Manual supplied with the vehicle provides specific
warnings and instructions on ensuring the vehicle is in ``PARK'' and
the key is removed before exiting the vehicle.
    2. The driver remains in the vehicle:
    If the driver remains in the vehicle, he or she would likely
either restart the vehicle's engine or attempt to remove the key to
exit the vehicle.
    If the driver attempts to restart the engine, paragraph S3.1.3
of FMVSS No. 102 requires that the starter be inoperative whenever
the vehicle's transmission shift position is in a forward or reverse
drive position. The driver rotating the ignition switch forward
attempting to start the engine will definitely activate the PRNDM
display. Therefore, the PRNDM information will be available to the
driver who can see that the vehicle did not start because the
transmission was not in ``Park'' or ``Neutral''.
    GM says that because both of these situations are addressed by
FMVSS requirements, a lack of a transmission shift position display
in either of these cases may constitute a minor inconvenience, but
will have no consequence to safety. In addition, GM stated that
NHTSA has previously granted similar petitions on 3 occasions.

    Furthermore, GM also stated the following:

    GM recognizes that there may be isolated non-driving situations
in which a person may desire to know gear selection or the relative
position of the gears with the engine off, such as when placing the
vehicle in tow. However, these cases occur infrequently and do not
occur during normal ignition activation and vehicle operation. If
the subject condition [noncompliance] is present during these
infrequent non-driving situations when PRNDM information may be
desired, gear selection and relative positioning can easily be
determined by rotating the ignition switch slightly clockwise past
the accessory ``ACC'' detent to activate the shift indicator display
without starting the vehicle's engine. Given the nature of these
non-driving situations and since the information can be readily
obtained with a slight key rotation, GM believes that the subject
condition [noncompliance] will have no real or implied degradation
of motor vehicle safety.

    GM stated that previous rulemakings and NHTSA decisions on several
previous inconsequential noncompliance petitions further support its
position that the subject noncompliances are inconsequential to motor
vehicle safety.
    GM also indicated that it has corrected the problem that caused the
subject noncompliance so that it cannot reoccur in future production.
    In view of the above, GM believes that the described noncompliance
is inconsequential and does not present a risk to motor vehicle safety.
Thus, GM requests that its petition, to exempt it from providing recall
notification of noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118 and
remedying the recall noncompliance as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120,
should be granted.
    NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance.
    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the docket and
notice number cited at the beginning of this notice and be submitted by
any of the following methods:
    a. By mail addressed to: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
    b. By hand delivery to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Section is open on
weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except Federal Holidays.
    c. Electronically: by logging onto the Federal Docket Management
System (FDMS) Web site at http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov/. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Comments may also be
faxed to 1-202-493-2251.
    Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that your comments were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to
http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
    Documents submitted to a docket may be viewed by anyone at the
address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the
Internet at http:[sol][sol]www.regulations.gov by following the online
instructions for accessing the dockets. DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in the

Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    The petition, supporting materials, and all comments received
before the close of business on the closing date indicated below will
be filed and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the extent possible. When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will be published in the Federal
Register pursuant to the authority indicated below.
    Comment closing date: November 22, 2010.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

    Issued on: October 14, 2010.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2010-26426 Filed 10-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register: February 11, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 28)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7692-7693]
[DOCID:fr11fe08-18]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 133

[Docket No. FDA-2008-P-0086] (formerly Docket No. 2000P-0586)

Cheeses and Related Cheese Products; Proposal to Permit the Use
of Ultrafiltered Milk; Extension of the Comment Period

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of the comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is extending the
comment period until April 11, 2008, for a proposed rule that was
published in the Federal Register of October 19, 2005 (70 FR 60751).
FDA issued a Federal Register notice to reopen the comment period on
this proposal on December 11, 2007 (72 FR 70251), to seek further
comment on only two specific issues raised by the comments concerning
the proposed ingredient declaration. The agency is extending this
comment period in response to a request to give interested parties
additional time to provide the information requested by FDA in that
notice.

DATES: Submit written or electronic comments by April 11, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FDA-2008-
P-0086, by any of the following methods:
Electronic Submissions
    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.

Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Written Submissions
    Submit written submissions in the following ways:
     FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier [For paper, disk, or CD-ROM
submissions]: Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    To ensure more timely processing of comments, FDA is no longer
accepting comments submitted to the agency by e-mail. FDA encourages
you to continue to submit electronic comments by using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, as described previously, in the ADDRESSES portion
of this document under Electronic Submissions.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and Docket No(s). and Regulatory Information Number (RIN) (if a RIN
number has been assigned) for this rulemaking. All comments received
may be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including

any personal information provided. For additional information on
submitting comments, see the ``Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and insert the

docket number(s), found in brackets in the heading of this document,
into the ``Search'' box and follow the prompts and/or go to the
Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville,
MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ritu Nalubola, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-820), Food and Drug Administration, 5100
Paint Branch Pkwy., College Park, MD 20740,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of October 19, 2005 (70 FR 60751), FDA
proposed to amend the definitions of ``milk'' and ``nonfat'' milk in
Sec.  133.3 (21 CFR 133.3) for cheeses and related cheese products to:
(1) Provide for ultrafiltration of milk and nonfat milk; (2) define UF
milk and UF nonfat milk as raw or pasteurized milk or nonfat milk that
is passed over one or more semipermeable membranes to partially remove
water, lactose, minerals, and water-soluble vitamins without altering
the casein-to-whey protein ratio of the milk or nonfat milk and
resulting in a liquid product; and (3) require that such treated milk
be declared in the ingredient statement of the finished food as
``ultrafiltered milk'' and ``ultrafiltered nonfat milk,'' respectively.
    The agency received about 24 responses, each containing one or more
comments to the 2005 proposal. Most comments supported the proposed use
of fluid UF milk in standardized cheeses and related cheese products
and several comments encouraged the agency to adopt the definition of
fluid UF milk as proposed. However, although they did not disagree that
fluid UF milk is significantly different from ``milk,'' several
comments opposed the proposed provision to require fluid UF milk or
fluid UF nonfat milk to be declared as ``ultrafiltered milk'' or
``ultrafiltered nonfat milk,'' respectively. They cited several reasons
for their opposition.
    FDA reopened the comment period on the proposed rule on December
11, 2007

(72 FR 70251) to seek public comment only with respect to two issues
raised in the comments that opposed the proposed provision to require
fluid UF milk or fluid UF nonfat milk to be declared as ``ultrafiltered
milk'' or ``ultrafiltered nonfat milk,'' respectively: (1) That, due to
economic and logistical burdens, it would be impracticable for cheese
manufacturers to comply with the labeling requirement; and (2) that the
proposed provision to declare fluid UF milk as ``ultrafiltered milk''
would be misleading to consumers in that consumers incorrectly believe
that cheeses that declare ``ultrafiltered milk'' as an ingredient are
different from those cheeses that declare ``milk'' as an ingredient or
``milk and ultrafiltered milk'' as ingredients.
    The agency has received a request for an additional 60 days to
respond to the questions FDA asked in its December 11, 2007, document.
The request expressed concern that the reopening of the comment period
did not allow adequate time to provide the data and information that
FDA requested.
    FDA has considered the request and is extending the request for an
additional 60 days until April 11, 2008. The agency believes that this
additional time will provide interested parties sufficient time to
respond to the questions raised in the December 11, 2007, docment.

II. Request for Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
    Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Web site transitioned
to the Federal Dockets Management System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-
wide, electronic docket management system. Electronic submissions will
be accepted by FDA through FDMS only.

    Dated: February 6, 2008.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E8-2454 Filed 2-8-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register: May 25, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 100)]
[Notices]
[Page 29385-29386]
[DOCID:fr25my10-108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Safety Advisory 2010-01

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Safety Advisory; Safety Appliance Securement,
Potential Failure of Welded and/or Notched Vertical Hand Brake Supports
on FTTX Flatcars.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FRA is issuing Safety Advisory 2010-01 in order to provide
guidance to interested parties concerning the inspection and repair of
FTTX series flatcars that have welded vertical hand brake supports that
have been modified to accommodate a 10-inch wide hand brake step. FRA's
Office of Railroad Safety Motive Power and Equipment (MP&E) Division
has been notified that approximately 1,851 FTTX series flatcars that
are owned by TTX Company (TTX) may have a notch cut into the vertical
hand brake supports, which compromises the safety of the hand brake
support angles.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Blankenship, Mechanical Engineer,
MP&E Division (RRS-14); FRA Office of Safety Assurance and Compliance,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, telephone: (202)
493-6446.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 29, 2008, at approximately 10:17 a.m.
(CST), a railroad employee was riding a cut of four cars while
attempting to set the hand brake on Flatcar GVSR 209000. During this
task, the hand brake support angles, which had been previously welded,
suddenly broke; this may have contributed to the employee falling under
the rolling equipment, resulting in a fatality. Preliminary details of
this incident indicate that the welded vertical hand brake support
angles had an ``old break'' condition that allowed the remaining weld
to fail when force was applied to the hand brake. Field investigation
of the failed vertical hand brake support indicated that the hand brake
and/or brackets were improperly applied or not mechanically fastened to
the car. See Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Sections
231.1(a)(4)(iii) and 231.27(a)(4)(iii), and Safety Appliance Defect
Code 231.110.B3, requiring hand brake housing to be securely fastened
to a car. As a result of this fatality, FRA issued Safety Advisory
2008-02 stating that additional flatcars may have vertical hand brake
supports that could be subject to a similar type of failure.
    Recognizing the need to ensure safety, FRA recommended that
railroads and car owners operating flatcars that have a vertical hand
brake support that is welded to the carbody carefully inspect the cars
to determine the adequacy of any welded securement. Further, any car
found with a defective condition should be immediately handled for
repair in accordance with 49 U.S.C. 20303, and repaired in accordance
with accepted industry practice or by using approved fasteners as
outlined in 49 CFR 231.1(a)(4)(iii). Welding, where present, must be
done in accordance with industry practice, as specified in American
Welding Society (AWS) Standards D1 and D15.
    Regional FRA inspectors have recently observed flatcars in TTX
ownership with FTTX reporting marks, which may also pose a significant
safety risk on account of notched vertical handbrake supports. The
vertical handbrake supports appear to have been ``notched'' in order to
apply a nonstandard 10-inch brake step in place of the 8-inch brake
step that was originally designed for the cars. Cars tentatively
identified that may have the nonstandard 10-inch brake step include,
but are not limited to, the following car series:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Known cars                    Possible series involved
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FTTX 961917...............................<PHONE_NUMBER>17
FTTX 971554...............................<PHONE_NUMBER>13
FTTX 972703, 972762, 972235...............<PHONE_NUMBER>46
FTTX 940540...............................<PHONE_NUMBER>72
FTTX 963325...............................  963325
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FRA has contacted the Association of American Railroads (AAR) and
the car owner, TTX, to alert AAR and its member railroads of the
potential safety risk these cars may pose in service. TTX and AAR have
issued an Early Warning (EW-5240) in accordance with AAR Rule 125,
which includes inspection instructions, temporary repair of affected
cars, and the recommended disposition of subject cars.
    Recommended Action: Due to the application of nonstandard 10-inch
wide brake steps, the strength of the vertical hand brake stanchions
may have been compromised on the above-noted FTTX flatcars. As with the
GVSR flatcar, there is a potential for cracked vertical stanchions. FRA
recommends and has requested that TTX furnish FRA with the following
information for the FTTX cars involved:
    1. The number of cars in TTX ownership (to include the reporting
marks with number series) that may have a welded vertical handbrake
support;
    2. The location of each car that is in service or storage;
    3. Each car that has been designated for scrapping, identified by
car number and storage location;
    4. A full description, calculations, and drawings/sketches for the
proposed ``temporary fix'';
    5. Any cars that have a ``notched stanchion,'' and any cars with
improperly applied hand brakes, must be handled in accordance with 49
U.S.C. 20303. Repairs to subject cars must be performed in accordance
with accepted industry practice or by using approved fasteners, as
outlined in 49 CFR 231.27(a)(4)(iii). Welding, where present, must be
performed to an acceptable manufacturing welding industry standard
(AWS) within a certified weld facility that typically makes weld
repairs to freight cars; and
    6. A concise ``action plan'' that includes the following:
    a. Schedule of car inspections covering those TTX cars potentially
at risk;
    b. Description of car disposition (scrap, temporary repair, or
permanent repair);
    c. Schedule of when all cars will have permanent repairs completed.
Schedule to include number of cars that will be repaired on a monthly
basis, and projected versus actual cars repaired;
    d. List of all cars that have or will have a welded repair. The
list should include the name of the AWS-qualified shop that will make
the repair for each car; and
    e. A final proposed permanent repair with attached drawings and
procedures.
    At this time, FRA further recommends that AAR and TTX continue to
inspect and repair all of the above-noted series flatcars, and
immediately handle for repair those cars found with defective fastening
conditions in accordance with EW-5240 via the following steps:
    1. Empty Cars. Conduct a visual inspection of the vertical hand
brake supports for cracks or evidence of a

stanchion that had previously been cracked and then weld repaired.
    a. Any stanchion found with a crack in vertical stanchion, or
cracked and then weld repaired stanchion, should be handled in
accordance with the following: withhold car from loading; repair car
per TTX Company Drawing No. 17057 (Rev. E), Handbrake Temporary
Stanchion Repair; alert car owner; and request disposition of car.
Report car as MW (Activity Code)--Car moving on AAR approved owners
instructions-also includes move to scrap.
    b. If no defects are found, the car may remain in service. Report
car as MR (Activity Code)--Car inspected; returned to service.
    2. Loaded Cars. Conduct a visual inspection of the vertical hand
brake supports for cracks or evidence of a stanchion that had
previously been cracked and then weld repaired.
    a. Any stanchion found with a crack in vertical stanchion, or
cracked and then weld repaired stanchion should be handled in
accordance with the following: repair car per TTX Company Drawing No.
17057 (Rev. E), Handbrake Temporary Stanchion Repair; move car to
destination and unload; withhold car from further loading; alert car
owner; and request disposition of car. Report car as MW--Car moving on
AAR approved owners instructions--also includes move to scrap.
    b. If no defects are found, the car may remain in service. Report
car as MR--Car inspected; returned to service.
    3. Temporary Repair. The temporary repair is fully documented in
the TTX Company Drawing identified above. The repair reinforces the
vertical stanchions with \1/2\'' plates. These doubler plates are
mechanically fastened to the vertical stanchions and are also
mechanically fastened into the end sill of the car. Disposition
requests noted in the above procedures should be directed to Mr. Rick
Clement at TTX. His direct phone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>. His e-mail
address is<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    FRA may modify this Safety Advisory 2010-01, issue additional
safety advisories, or take other appropriate action necessary to ensure
the highest level of safety on the Nation's railroads.

    Issued in Washington, DC on May 19, 2010.
Jo Strang,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety/Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-12556 Filed 5-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 53 (Monday, March 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 15227]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05807]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4586-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

Texas; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Texas (FEMA-4586-DR), dated February 19, 2021, and
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued February 25, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Texas is hereby amended to include the following areas
among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the
event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of
February 19, 2021.

    Atascosa, Bandera, Brooks, Duval, Eastland, Ector, Goliad,
Howard, Jim Hogg, Karnes, Kleberg, Leon, Llano, Newton, Robertson,
Trinity, Webb, and Willacy Counties for Individual Assistance
(already designated for emergency protective measures [Category B],
including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance
program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Robert J. Fenton,
Senior Official Performing the Duties of the Administrator, Federal
Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-05807 Filed 3-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: March 17, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 52)]
[Notices]
[Page 13821]
[DOCID:fr17mr06-45]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-267-000]

CenterPoint Energy--Mississippi River Transmission Corporation;
Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

March 10, 2006.
    Take notice that on March 7, 2006, CenterPoint Energy--Mississippi
River Transmission Corporation (MRT) tendered for filing as part of its
FERC Gas Tariff, Third Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets listed
on Appendix A to the filing, to be effective April 7, 2006.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-3887 Filed 3-16-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 15, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 157)]
[CORRECTIONS]
[Page 45866]
[DOCID:fr15au07-152]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

    Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: US Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Assistance,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.
    Extension: Rule 13e-3 (Schedule 13E-3), OMB Control No. 3235-0007,
SEC File No. 270-1.

Correction

    In notice document E7-15181 beginning on page 43670 in the issue of
Monday, August 6, 2007, make the following correction:
    On page 43670, in the second column, the document heading is
corrected to read as set forth above.

[FR Doc. Z7-15181 Filed 8-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 1505-01-D


UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY                NATIONAL VEHICLE AND FUEL EMISSIONS LABORATORY
                              2565 PLYMOUTH ROAD
                        ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48105-2498

                                   OFFICE OF
                               AIR AND RADIATION

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:	Air Quality Modeling Outputs for the Final Heavy-Duty GHG Phase 2 Standards

FROM:	Margaret Zawacki
		Assessment and Standards Division
		Office of Transportation and Air Quality

TO:		Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2014-0827

DATE:		July 26, 2016

The purpose of this memorandum is to transmit data files which were used in the air quality modeling analyses for the Final Heavy-Duty GHG Phase 2 Standards.  The air quality modeling analyses are discussed in Section VIII.D.2 of the preamble, Chapter 6.2.2 of the Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) and in the Air Quality Modeling Technical Support Document.  Information on the air quality modeling inventories is discussed in Chapter 5 of the RIA.

Following is a list of the information contained on the enclosed disc:

- deposition DBF files folder: gridded annual nitrogen and sulfur deposition difference data for 2040 reference case and HDGHG2 control scenario

- toxics DBF files folder:  gridded annual and seasonal (winter/summer) toxics difference data for 2040 reference case and HDGHG2 control scenario

- HDGHG2_Final_Ozone_DVs.xlsx:  county-level 8-hour max ozone Design Value projections for 2040 reference case and HDGHG2 control scenario

- HDGHG2_Final_annualPM_DVs.xlsx:  county-level annual PM2.5 Design Value projections for 2040 reference case and HDGHG2 control scenario

- HDGHG2_Final_dailyPM_dvs.xlsx:  county-level 24-hour PM2.5 Design Value projections for 2040 reference case and HDGHG2 control scenario

- HDGHG2_Final_Visibility.xlsx:  Class 1 Area visibility projections for the 20% worst days for 2011 reference case, 2040 reference case and HDGHG2 control scenario

- CMAQv5.0_Release Notes.docx: RELEASE_NOTES for CMAQv5.0

- CMAQv5.0.2_Release Notes.docx: RELEASE_NOTES for CMAQv5.0.2

- MET_TSD_2011_final_11-26-14.pdf:  Misenis, C.  Meteorological Model Performance for Annual 2011 WRF v3.4 Simulation, USEPA/OAQPS, November 26, 2014.

Attachments


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 244 (Thursday, December 19, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 76784-76787]
[FR Doc No: 2013-30098]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0915; Airspace Docket No. 12-ASO-41]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Modification, Revocation, and Establishment of Area
Navigation (RNAV) Routes; Charlotte, NC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish two RNAV routes; modify
three RNAV routes; and remove one RNAV route in the Charlotte, NC,
area. The route changes are proposed to support the Charlotte
Optimization of Airspace and Procedures in a Metroplex (OAPM) project.
The proposed routes, in combination with existing VOR Federal airways,
would provide additional routing options through and around the
Metroplex airspace.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 3, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2013-
0915 and Airspace Docket No. 13-ASO-41 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace Policy and
Regulations Group, Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.

    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2013-0915 and Airspace Docket No. 13-ASO-41) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2013-0915 and Airspace Docket No. 12-AEA-41.''
The postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, Room 210, 1701 Columbia Ave., College Park, GA
30337.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 to establish two low-altitude RNAV routes
(T-206 and T-214); modify three RNAV routes (T-201, T-202 and T-203);
and remove one RNAV route (T-200), in the Charlotte, NC, area.
    The following actions are proposed:
    T-200: The FAA is proposing to remove T-200 in its entirety. T-200
extends between the Foothills, GA, VORTAC (ODF) and the Florence, SC,
VORTAC (FLO). It passes through the RICHE fix at the very south end of
the Charlotte Class B airspace area. T-200 is seldom used as it
traverses very close to the ``final box'' for Charlotte/Douglas
International Airport (CLT) when CLT is landing to the north. The
proposed modification of T-202 (see below) would provide routing
through the south end of the CLT Class B airspace area in place of T-
200. Aircraft flying from ODF to FLO, and vice versa, would fly direct
rather than utilizing the RICHE fix. Therefore, it was determined that
realignment of T-200 is impractical.
    T-201: T-201 extends between the Columbia, SC, VORTAC (CAE) and the
JOTTA, NC, fix. This proposed modification would shorten the length of
the route so that it would extend between the MEVAE, SC, waypoint (WP)
(near Bethune, SC) at the south end, and the BORTZ, NC, WP (south of
the JOTTA fix) at the north end. In addition, the track of the route
would be shifted approximately seven nautical miles (NM) to the east of
its current position. The shift would move the route to the east of the
CLT Class B airspace area where it would pass through the FEGNO, NC, WP
instead of the LOCAS, NC, fix (on the eastern boundary of the Class B
airspace area). The modified route would segregate low altitude
overflight traffic from CLT departure and arrival traffic while keeping
the T-201 designator. Waypoints along the route would provide
connectivity with RNAV routes T-202, T-206 and T-214 (described below).
Also along the route, the TRUEX, SC, WP would serve as an ingress/
egress point for the Florence, SC, Terminal Radar Approach Control
(TRACON) airspace.
    T-202: T-202 now extends between the RICHE, SC, fix and the GANTS,
NC, fix. This proposal would extend the route at both ends:
northeastward from the GANTS fix to the ZADEL WP (near Asheboro
Municipal Airport, NC (HBI); and westward from the RICHE fix to the
GURSH WP (near Union County Airport (35A), SC). The modified route
would utilize airspace around the south of CLT when CLT is landing and
departing to the south. That segment from the RICHE WP to the HUSTN WP
would segregate T-202 traffic from CLT departures. Waypoints along the
route would provide connectivity to T-201, T-206 and T-214.
Additionally, the GANTS fix is located at the boundary of the Charlotte
and Greensboro TRACONs airspace. This would minimize the impact on
satellite and adjacent airport operations by providing a predictable
track for overflight traffic while keeping the T-202 designator.
    T-203: T-203 extends between the Columbia, SC, VORTAC (CAE) and the
Pulaski, VA, VORTAC (PSK). The FAA proposes to shorten the route by
changing the endpoints to the ANDYS, SC, fix (near Winnsboro, SC) at
the south end, and the OREAD, NC, WP (10 miles north of Hickory, NC) at
the north end. In addition, the track would be shifted slightly to the
west of its current position but still transiting through the west side
of the CLT Class B airspace area. By routing T-203 via the ROUTH, NC,
WP (near Grover, SC), transiting aircraft would be segregated from CLT
departure airspace. The modified route would keep the T-203 designator.
Waypoints along the route would provide connectivity to T-202, T-206
and T-214.
    T-206: T-206 would be established to extend between the ENADE, NC,
WP (near Cliffside, NC) and the ZADEL, NC, WP (near Asheboro Regional
Airport (HBI), NC). The route would be used to transition aircraft
through the north side of the CLT Class B airspace area when CLT is
landing and departing to the north. Waypoints along the route would
provide connectivity to T-201, T-202, T-203 and T-214. Additionally,
the alignment of T-206 through the GOTHS, NC, WP (northwest of the
existing MOPED, NC, fix) would deconflict transiting traffic from CLT
departures.
    T-214: T-214 would be established to extend between the OREAD WP
and the ORPEE, NC, WP (north of Troy, NC). This route would allow
aircraft to transition north of the CLT Class B airspace, but within
the Metroplex area, when CLT is landing and departing to the north.
Greensboro TRACON (GSO) radar vectors aircraft that are filed for
points northwest of CLT in order to separate them from CLT arrivals
that are inbound from the northeast. Once they are clear of the
arrivals, GSO then clears the aircraft direct to the Holston Mountain,
TN, VORTAC (HMV) to resume their filed routes. T-214 would provide a
predictable route to points northwest and west of Charlotte that are
deconflicted from the CLT arrival flow.
    The routes proposed in this notice would be segregated from the
heavily used arrival and departure corridors serving the Charlotte area
and would enhance the efficiency of the National Airspace System in the
Charlotte, NC, Metroplex area.
    RNAV routes are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA Order 7400.9X

dated August 7, 2013, and effective September 15, 2013, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The RNAV routes listed in
this document would be subsequently published in the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) Is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under Department of Transportation (DOT)
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
would only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would modify the route structure as required to preserve the safe
and efficient flow of air traffic in the Charlotte, NC, area.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures,'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9X,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, Dated August 7, 2013, and
effective September 15, 2013, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6011--United States Area Navigation Routes

T-200 Foothills, GA to Florence, SC [Removed]

T-201 MEVAE, SC to BORTZ, NC [Amended]
MEVAE, SC              WP                    (Lat. 34[deg]25'05'' N., long. 80[deg]22'28'' W.)
TRUEX, SC              WP                    (Lat. 34[deg]35'55'' N., long. 80[deg]21'18'' W.)
FEGNO, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]14'49'' N., long. 80[deg]16'39'' W.)
NUROE, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]34'37'' N., long. 80[deg]31'15'' W.)
BORTZ, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]52'56'' N., long. 80[deg]44'56'' W.)
T-202 GURSH, SC to ZADEL, NC [Amended]
GURSH, SC.             WP                    (Lat. 34[deg]42'05'' N., long. 81[deg]30'32'' W.)
AWRYT, SC              WP                    (Lat. 34[deg]42'00'' N., long. 81[deg]14'52'' W.)
RICHE, SC              FIX                   (Lat. 34[deg]41'54'' N., long. 80[deg]59'23'' W.)
HUSTN, NC              FIX                   (Lat. 34[deg]53'20'' N., long. 80[deg]34'20'' W.)
FEGNO, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]14'49'' N., long. 80[deg]16'39'' W.)
GANTS, NC              FIX                   (Lat. 35[deg]27'11'' N., long. 80[deg]06'16'' W.)
ZADEL, NC.             WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]33'47'' N., long. 80[deg]01'47'' W.)
T-203 ANDYS, SC to OREAD, NC [Amended]
ANDYS, SC              FIX                   (Lat. 34[deg]22'15'' N., long. 81[deg]08'38'' W.)
AWRYT, SC              WP                    (Lat. 34[deg]42'00'' N., long. 81[deg]14'52'' W.)
ROUTH, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]10'38'' N., long. 81[deg]23'59'' W.)
FADOS, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]28'22'' N., long. 81[deg]20'49'' W.)
OREAD, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]52'03'' N., long. 81[deg]16'32'' W.)
T-206 ENADE, NC to ZADEL, NC [New]
ENADE, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]12'08'' N., long. 81[deg]44'41'' W.)
FADOS, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]28'22'' N., long. 81[deg]20'49'' W.)
GOTHS, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]35'17'' N., long. 80[deg]58'25'' W.)
NUROE, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]34'37'' N., long. 80[deg]31'15'' W.)
ZADEL, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]33'47'' N., long. 80[deg]01'47'' W.)
T-214 OREAD, NC to ORPEE, NC [New]
OREAD, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]52'03'' N., long. 81[deg]16'32'' W.)
BORTZ, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]52'56'' N., long. 80[deg]44'56'' W.)
THMSN, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]53'21'' N., long. 80[deg]28'57'' W.)
ZADEL, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]33'47'' N., long. 80[deg]01'47'' W.)
ORPEE, NC              WP                    (Lat. 35[deg]27'12'' N., long. 79[deg]52'56'' W.)

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 11, 2013.
Ellen Crum,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2013-30098 Filed 12-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 232 (Friday, December 2, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 87112-87113]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28934]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-79412; File No. SR-BatsEDGA-2016-28]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Make
a Ministerial Change to Exchange Rules 11.10, 11.14, and 11.21

November 28, 2016.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on November 17, 2016, Bats EDGA Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange''
or ``EDGA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
has designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to make a ministerial change to
Exchange Rules 11.10(a)(4)(D), 11.14(g)(4), and 11.21(a)(7)(A)(i)(2).
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
Web site at www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to make a ministerial change to Exchange
Rules 11.10(a)(4)(D), 11.14(g)(4), and 11.21(a)(7)(A)(i)(2). First, the
Exchange proposes to amend Rule 11.10(a)(4)(D) to correct a
typographical error by replacing EDGX with EDGA. Second, the Exchange
proposes to remove an erroneous reference to Rule 11.12 within Rule
11.14(g)(4). The Exchange notes that it previously revised Chapter XI
of its rules, including the

renumbering of current Rule 11.14, Limitation of Liability, which was
previously Rule 11.12.\5\ However, it failed at that time to update the
rule reference within Rule 11.14(g)(4) from 11.12 to 11.14. The
Exchange now proposes to delete this erroneous rule reference within
Rule 11.14(g)(4) as reference to rule is not integral or necessary to
the meaning or application of Rule 11.14 generally. Lastly, the
Exchange proposes to amend Rule 11.21(a)(7)(A)(i)(2) to correct a
typographical error by replacing the phrase ``one of more'' with ``one
or more''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72812 (August 11,
2014), 79 FR 48823 (August 18, 2014) (SR-EDGA-2014-20).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \7\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest.
The Exchange believes the proposed changes to Exchange Rules
11.10(a)(4)(D), 11.14(g)(4) and 11.21(a)(7)(A)(i)(2) will provide
clarity to the Exchange's rules and avoid potential investor confusion.
The Exchange notes that neither change alters the meaning or
application of each rule. As such, the proposed amendments would foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities and would remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. On the contrary, the
proposed rule change will have no impact on competition as it simply
corrects a typographical error, and removes erroneous and irrelevant
rule text while not altering the meaning or application of each rule.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any written comments from members or other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \8\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(iii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \10\ to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BatsEDGA-2016-28 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BatsEDGA-2016-28. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-BatsEDGA-2016-28, and should
be submitted on or before December 23, 2016.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2016-28934 Filed 12-1-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 2 (Friday, January 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 392-393]
[FR Doc No: 2013-31448]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9012-8]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements
Filed 12/23/2013 Through 12/27/2013

Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment
letters on EISs are available at: http://www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/eisdata.html.

EIS No. 20130381, Draft EIS, FHWA, TX, US 181 Harbor Bridge Project,
Comment Period Ends: 03/03/2014, Contact: Gregory Punske<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20130382, Draft EIS, NPS, 00, Glen Canyon National Recreation
Area Off-road Vehicle Management Plan, Comment Period Ends: 03/04/2014,
Contact: Brian Carey<PHONE_NUMBER>.
EIS No. 20130383, Final EIS, USACE, CA, Berryessa Creek Element Coyote
and Berryessa Creek California Flood Control Project, Review Period
Ends: 02/03/2014, Contact: Tyler Stalker<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Amended Notices

EIS No. 20130325, Draft EIS, NPS, MO, Ozark National Scenic Riverways
Draft General Management Plan, Wilderness Study, Comment Period Ends:
02/07/2014, Contact: William Black<PHONE_NUMBER>, Revision to the FR
Notice Published 12/06/2013; Extending Comment Period from 01/08/2014
to 02/07/2014.
EIS No. 20130360, Final EIS, USFS, AZ, Rosemont Copper Project,
Proposed Construction, Operation with Concurrent Reclamation and
Closure of an Open-Pit Copper Mine, Review Period Ends: 02/14/2014,
Contact: Mindy Vogel<PHONE_NUMBER>, Revision to FR Notice Published 12/
20/2013; Correcting the Review Period End Date to read 02/14/2014.

    Dated: December 30, 2013.
Dawn Roberts,
Management Analyst, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal
Activities.
[FR Doc. 2013-31448 Filed 1-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 102 (Friday, May 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34226-34227]
[FR Doc No: 2023-11301]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Notice of Applications for Modification to
Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of applications for modification of special permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations, notice is hereby given
that the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety has received the
application described herein.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 12, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Washington, DC 20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donald Burger, Chief, Office of
Hazardous Materials Safety General Approvals and Permits Branch,
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department
of Transportation, East Building, PHH-13, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Each mode of transportation for which a
particular special permit is requested is indicated by a number in the
``Nature of Application'' portion of the table below as follows: 1--
Motor vehicle, 2--Rail freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft
only, 5--Passenger-carrying aircraft.
    Copies of the applications are available for inspection in the
Records Center, East Building, PHH-13, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington DC or at http://regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 5, 2023.
Donald P. Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits Branch.

                                              Special Permits Data
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Nature of the special
          Application No.                   Applicant        Regulation(s) affected        permits thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7835-M.............................  Versum Materials US,    172.301(c), 177.848(d)  To modify the special
                                      LLC.                                            permit to authorize DOT-SP
                                                                                15267 packagings. (mode
                                                                                1).
9232-M.............................  Department of Defense   172.1, 175.1..........  To modify the special
                                      U.S. Army Military                              permit to remove paragraph
                                      Surface Deployment &                            7.c.(10). (modes 4, 5).
                                      Distribution Command.
11379-M............................  ZF Passive Safety       173.302(a)(1),          To modify the special
                                      Systems US Inc.         173.301(a).             permit to authorize
                                                                                reduced frequency of
                                                                                cylinder burst testing.
                                                                                (modes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5).
15343-M............................  Desert Air Transport,   172.101(j), 173.242...  To modify the special
                                      Inc.                                            permit to authorize an
                                                                                additional packaging (mode
                                                                                4).
15642-M............................  Linde Gas & Equipment   172.203(a),             To modify the special
                                      Inc.                    180.205(c),             permit to extend the
                                                              180.209(a),             initial periodic
                                                              180.209(b),             requalification period of
                                                              180.209(b)(1)(iv).      DOT 3AL and DOT-SP 12440
                                                                                cylinders from 5 years to
                                                                                10 years and to authorize
                                                                                certain newly manufactured
                                                                                DOT 3AL cylinders to be
                                                                                used in dedicated dry-gas
                                                                                service. (modes 1, 2, 3,
                                                                                4, 5).
16279-M............................  Stericycle, Inc.......  173.196(a)............  To modify the special
                                                                                permit to authorize the
                                                                                transportation in commerce
                                                                                of the Marburg virus.
                                                                                (modes 1, 3).
20251-M............................  Salco Products Inc....  172.203(a), 178.345-1,  To modify the special
                                                              180.413.                permit to authorize
                                                                                additional manway
                                                                                configurations. (mode 1).

21360-M............................  ABG Bag, Inc..........  173.12(b)(2)(ii)(C),    To modify the special
                                                              178.707(d).             permit to authorize
                                                                                Division 5.2 hazardous
                                                                                materials. (mode 1).
21460-M............................  Amerex Corporation....  173.309(c),             To modify the special
                                                              172.203(a),             permit to remove the
                                                              172.301(c).             requirement that the
                                                                                special permit be provided
                                                                                to the air carrier and to
                                                                                authorize a copy of the
                                                                                special permit to be
                                                                                accessible electronically
                                                                                through a QR code directly
                                                                                applied to each
                                                                                extinguisher in lieu of
                                                                                having a paper copy of the
                                                                                special permit be
                                                                                maintained at each
                                                                                facility where the
                                                                                extinguishers are offered
                                                                                or reoffered. (modes 1, 2,
                                                                                3, 4, 5).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2023-11301 Filed 5-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P