[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 50 (Thursday, March 16, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 13990]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05206]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14838-000]

Energy Resources USA, Inc.; Notice of Preliminary Permit
Application Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments and Motions To
Intervene

    On February 9, 2017, Energy Resources USA Inc., (Energy Resources)
filed an application for a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f)
of the Federal Power Act (FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of
the Caddo Dam Hydroelectric Project (project) to be located at the U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers' Caddo Dam on the Cypress Bayou in Caddo Parish
County, Louisiana. The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued,
is to grant the permit holder priority to file a license application
during the permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the
permit holder to perform any land-disturbing activities or otherwise
enter upon lands or waters owned by others without the owners' express
permission.
    The proposed project would consist of the following: (1) A 70-foot-
long, 60-foot-wide intake area; (2) a 75-foot-long, 36-foot-wide
powerhouse containing two vertical Kaplan generating units with a total
capacity of 5 megawatts; (3) a 350-foot-long, 65-foot-wide tailrace;
(4) a 60-foot-long, 50-foot-wide substation; and (5) a 0.35-mile-long,
69 kilovolt transmission line. The estimated annual generation of the
project would be 21.15 gigawatt-hours, and would operate as directed by
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Bernard Mount, Senior Project Manager,
Energy Resources USA Inc., 4305 N Lincoln Ave., Room C, Chicago,
Illinois 60618; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Navreet Deo; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filing. Please file
comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications using the Commission's eFiling system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(866) 208-3676 (toll free), or (202) 502-
8659 (TTY). In lieu of electronic filing, please send a paper copy to:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The first page of any filing should include
docket number P-14838-000.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-14838-000) in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: March 8, 2017.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-05206 Filed 3-15-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 85)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 23636-23637]
[DOCID:fr04my10-27]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2010-0403; Airspace Docket No. 10-ACE-4]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Perryville, MO

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace at Perryville,
MO. Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) at Perryville Municipal
Airport, Perryville, MO. The FAA is taking this action to enhance the
safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at
the airport.

DATES: 0901 UTC. Comments must be received on or before June 18, 2010.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You
must identify the docket number FAA-2010-0403/Airspace Docket No. 10-
ACE-4, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments
through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the
public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any
final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office
(telephone 1-800-647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at
the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd, Fort Worth, TX 76137; telephone: 817-321-
7716.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2010-0403/
Airspace Docket No. 10-ACE-4.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_
amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. An
informal docket may also be examined during normal business hours at
the office of the Central Service Center, 2601 Meacham Blvd, Fort
Worth, TX 76137.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRM's should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    This action proposes to amend Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR), part 71 by adding additional Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface for SIAPs at Perryville
Municipal Airport, Perryville, MO. Controlled airspace is needed for
the safety and management of IFR operations at the airport.
    Class E airspace areas are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9T, dated August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document would be published subsequently in
the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, part A, subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would add additional controlled airspace at Perryville Municipal
Airport, Perryville, MO.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order
7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27,
2009, and effective September 15, 2009, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

ACE MO E5 Perryville, MO [Amended]

Perryville Municipal Airport, MO
    (Lat. 37[deg]52'07'' N., long. 89[deg]51'44'' W.)

Farmington VORTAC, MO
    (Lat. 37[deg]40'24'' N., long. 90[deg]14'03'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.6-mile radius of Perryville Municipal Airport and within
1.8 miles each side of the 057[deg] radial of the Farmington VORTAC
extending from the 6.6-mile radius to 8.2 miles southwest of the
airport, and within 3.9 miles each side of the 197[deg] bearing from
the airport extending from the 6.6-mile radius to 11 miles south of
the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX on April 23, 2010.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2010-10323 Filed 5-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 91 (Friday, May 10, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20626-20627]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09693]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2019-0194; FRL9993-29-OLEM]

Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System (``e-Manifest'')
Advisory Board; Notice of Public Meeting

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will convene the
Hazardous Waste Electronic System (``e-Manifest'') Advisory Board for a
three (3) day public meeting to seek the Board's consultation and
recommendations regarding the e-Manifest system (Meeting Theme:
``Increasing Adoption of the e-Manifest System'').

DATES: The meeting will be held on June 18-20, 2019, from approximately
9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. EDT.
    Comments. The Agency encourages written comments be submitted on or
before June 4, 2019, and requests for oral comments to be submitted on
or before June 11, 2019. Written comments and requests to make oral
comments may be submitted up until the date of the meeting; however,
anyone submitting written comments or requests for oral comments after
June 11, 2019, should contact the Designated Federal Officer (DFO)
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. For additional
instructions, see section I.C. under SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
    Webcast. This meeting may be webcast. Please refer to the e-
Manifest website at www.epa.gov/e-manifest for information on how to
access the webcast. Please note that the webcast is a supplementary
public service provided only for convenience. If difficulties arise
resulting in webcasting outages, the meeting will continue as planned.
    Special accommodations. For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, and to request accommodation of a
disability, please contact the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT at least ten (10) days prior to the meeting to give the EPA as
much time as possible to process your request.

ADDRESSES:
    Meeting: The meeting will be held at the Environmental Protection
Agency Conference Center, Lobby Level, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA 22202.
    Comments. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OLEM-2019-0194 at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or withdrawn. The EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (e.g., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fred Jenkins, Designated Federal
Officer (DFO), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery, (MC: 5303P), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC, 20460, Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or by email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. This action may
be of particular interest to persons who are or may be subject to the
Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest Establishment (e-Manifest) Act.

B. How may I participate in this meeting?

    You may participate in this meeting by following the instructions
in this document. To ensure proper receipt of your public comments by
the EPA, it is imperative that you identify docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OLEM-2019-0194.
    1. Written comments. The Agency encourages written comments be

submitted electronically via regulations.gov, using the instructions in
the ADDRESSES Comments section on or before June 4, 2019, to provide
the e-Manifest Advisory Board the time necessary to consider and review
the written comments. Written comments are accepted until the date of
the meeting, but anyone submitting written comments after June 11,
2019, should contact the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Anyone submitting written comments at the meeting should bring
fifteen (15) copies for distribution to the e-Manifest Advisory Board.
    2. Oral comments. The Agency encourages each individual or group
wishing to make brief oral comments to the e-Manifest Advisory Board to
submit their request to the DFO listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT on or before June 11, 2019, in order to be included on the
meeting agenda. Requests to present oral comments will be accepted
until the date of the meeting. To the extent that time permits, the
Chair of the e-Manifest Advisory Board may permit the presentation of
oral comments at the meeting by interested persons who have not
previously requested time. The request should identify the name of the
individual making the presentation, the organization (if any) that the
individual represents, and any requirements for audiovisual equipment.
Oral comments before the e-Manifest Advisory Board are limited to
approximately five (5) minutes unless prior arrangements have been
made. In addition, each speaker should bring fifteen (15) copies of his
or her comments and presentation for distribution to the e-Manifest
Advisory Board at the meeting.
    3. Seating at the meeting. Seating at the meeting will be open and
on a first-come basis.

C. Purpose of the e-Manifest Advisory Board

    The Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest System Advisory Board is
established in accordance with the provisions of the Hazardous Waste
Electronic Manifest Establishment Act, 42 U.S.C. 6939g, and the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App.2. The e-Manifest Advisory
Board is in the public interest and supports the Environmental
Protection Agency in performing its duties and responsibilities.
    The e-Manifest Advisory Board will provide recommendations on
matters related to the operational activities, functions, policies, and
regulations of the EPA under the e-Manifest Act, including: The
effectiveness of the e-Manifest IT system and associated user fees and
processes; matters and policies related to the e-Manifest program;
regulations and guidance as required by the e-Manifest Act; actions to
encourage the use of the electronic (paperless) system; changes to the
user fees as described in e-Manifest Act Section 2(c)(3)(B)(i); and
issues in the e-Manifest area, including those identified in the EPA's
E-Enterprise strategy that intersect with the e-Manifest system, such
as: Business-to-business communications; performance standards for
mobile devices; and the EPA's Cross Media Electronic Reporting Rule
(CROMERR) requirements.
    The sole duty of the Advisory Board is to provide advice and
recommendations to the EPA Administrator. As required by the e-Manifest
Act, the e-Manifest Advisory Board is composed of nine (9) members. One
(1) member is the EPA Administrator (or a designee), who serves as
Chairperson of the Advisory Board. The rest of the committee is
composed of:
     At least two (2) members who have expertise in information
technology;
     At least three (3) members who have experience in using or
represent users of the manifest system to track the transportation of
hazardous waste under the e-Manifest Act;
     At least three (3) members who are state representatives
responsible for processing manifests.
    All members of the e-Manifest Advisory Board, except for the EPA
Administrator, are appointed as Special Government Employees or
representatives.

D. Public Meeting

    EPA launched the e-Manifest system on June 30, 2018. e-Manifest
enables those persons required to use a RCRA manifest under either
federal or state law the option of using electronic manifests to track
shipments of hazardous waste and to meet certain RCRA reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
    EPA will convene its next public meeting of the e-Manifest System
Advisory Board from June 18-20, 2019. The purpose of this meeting is to
obtain advice from the Board on ways to increase the adoption of the e-
Manifest system. The Agency has received feedback from the user
community that clarifying the requirements and implementation of
CROMERR is one way to encourage greater adoption of fully electronic
manifests. The Agency will address this topic and propose technological
solutions for consideration by the Board.

E. e-Manifest Advisory Board Documents and Meeting Minutes

    The meeting background paper, related supporting materials, charge/
questions to the Advisory Board, the Advisory Board membership roster
(i.e., members attending this meeting), and the meeting agenda will be
available by approximately mid-May 2019. In addition, the Agency may
provide additional background documents as the materials become
available. You may obtain electronic copies of these documents, and
certain other related documents that might be available at http://www.regulations.gov and the e-Manifest Advisory Board website at:
https://www.epa.gov/e-manifest/hazardous-waste-electronic-manifest-system-e-manifest-advisory-board.
    The e-Manifest Advisory Board will prepare meeting minutes
summarizing its recommendations to the Agency approximately ninety (90)
days after the meeting. The meeting minutes will be posted on the e-
Manifest Advisory Board website or may be obtained from the docket at
http://www.regulations.gov. Regarding the e-Manifest Advisory Board
membership, prior to this meeting, EPA will announce the full
membership of the Board including newly appointed and/or reappointed
members on the e-Manifest Advisory Board web page at https://www.epa.gov/e-manifest/hazardous-waste-electronic-manifest-system-e-manifest-advisory-board.

    Dated: April 24, 2019.
Barnes Johnson,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Office of Land
and Emergency Management.
[FR Doc. 2019-09693 Filed 5-9-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 34 (Tuesday, February 20, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 7129]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03274]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 257

[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2017-0613; FRL-9974-49-OLEM]

Oklahoma: Approval of Coal Combustion Residuals State Permit
Program; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of availability; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is
extending the comment period on EPA's proposal to approve Oklahoma's
Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) State Permit Program. The notice
announcing this proposed approval was published on January 16, 2018,
and the public comment period was scheduled to end on March 2, 2018.
However, a number of public interest groups have requested additional
time to review Oklahoma's application for a CCR State Permit Program
and to develop and submit comments. Therefore, in response to the
request for additional time, EPA is extending the comment period, so
that comments are now due on or before March 19, 2018.

DATES: Comments on the notice of availability published January 16,
2018 (83 FR 2100) must be received on or before March 19, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OLEM-2017-0613; Title: Oklahoma: Approval of Coal Combustion Residuals
State Permit Program at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Jackson, Materials Recovery and
Waste Management Division, Office of Resource Conservation and
Recovery, Mail code 5304P, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (703)
308-8453; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA is proposing to approve Oklahoma's CCR
state permit program application, pursuant to RCRA 4005(d)(1)(B). If
approved, the Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ)'s
permit program would operate ``in lieu of'' the federal CCR program,
codified at 40 CFR part 257, subpart D.
    On July 31, 2017 Oklahoma submitted to EPA its initial application.
The State supplemented its original application on October 18, 2017.
EPA determined that the application was complete and notified Oklahoma
of its determination by letter dated December 21, 2017.
    The statute requires EPA to evaluate two components of a state
program to determine whether it meets the standard for approval. First,
EPA is to evaluate the adequacy of the permit program (or other system
of prior approval and conditions) itself. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(A).
Second, EPA is to evaluate the adequacy of the technical criteria that
will be included in each permit, to determine whether they are the same
as the federal criteria, or to the extent they differ, whether the
modified criteria are ``at least as protective as'' the federal
requirements. See 42 U.S.C. 6945(d)(1)(B). Only if both components meet
the statutory requirements may EPA approve the program. See 42 U.S.C.
6945(d)(1).
    On that basis, EPA conducted an analysis of ODEQ's application,
including a thorough analysis of OAC 252:517 and its adoption of 40 CFR
part 257, subpart D. Based on this analysis, EPA has preliminarily
determined that ODEQ's submitted CCR permit program meets the standard
for approval in section 4005(d)(1)(A) and (B). EPA is therefore
proposing to approve Oklahoma's application. Oklahoma's program
contains all the elements of the federal rule, including requirements
for location restrictions, design and operating criteria, groundwater
monitoring and corrective action, closure requirements and post-closure
care, recordkeeping, notification and internet posting requirements. It
also contains state-specific language, references and state-specific
requirements that differ from the federal rule, which EPA has
preliminarily determined to be at least as protective as the federal
criteria. EPA's analysis and preliminary findings are available in the
docket supporting this proposed action.
    The notice announcing the proposed approval of Oklahoma's
application was published on January 16, 2018, and the comment period
was scheduled to end on March 2, 2018. See 83 FR 2100. Since
publication of the notice, a number of stakeholders have requested
additional time to review Oklahoma's application and to develop and
submit comments. Therefore, after considering this request for
additional time, EPA has decided to extend the comment period until
March 19, 2018.

    Dated: February 8, 2018.
Barry N. Breen,
Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator, Office of Land and Emergency
Management.
[FR Doc. 2018-03274 Filed 2-16-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: September 15, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 178)]
[Notices]
[Page 56147-56150]
[DOCID:fr15se10-122]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62870; File No. SR-CBOE-2010-078]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Permit Certain FLEX Options To Trade Under the FLEX
Trading Procedures for a Limited Time on a Closing Only Basis

September 8, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 30, 2010, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``Exchange'' or ``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by
the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend certain CBOE rules pertaining to

Flexible Exchange (``FLEX'') Options to permit certain FLEX Options to
continue to trade under the FLEX trading procedures for a limited time.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site (http://www.cboe.org/Legal), on the Commission's Web site at
http://www.sec.gov; at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to allow certain FLEX Options, which
are identical in all terms to a Non-FLEX Option, to continue to trade
using the FLEX trading procedures for the balance of the trading day on
which the Non-FLEX Option is added as an intra-day add.
    The Exchange recently adopted rule changes to allow FLEX Options to
expire on or within two business days of a third-Friday-of-the-month
expiration (``Expiration FLEX Options'').\3\ Such FLEX Options could
have either an American-, European-, or European-Capped-style exercise.
Among other things, the rule change also provided that Expiration FLEX
Options will be permitted before (but not after) Non-FLEX Options with
identical terms are listed. Once and if an option series is listed for
trading as a Non-FLEX Option series, (i) all existing open positions
established under the FLEX trading procedures shall be fully fungible
with transactions in the respective Non-FLEX Option series, and (ii)
any further trading in the series would be as Non-FLEX Options subject
to the Non-FLEX trading procedures and rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59417 (February 18,
2009), 74 FR 8591 (February 25, 2009) (SR-CBOE-2008-115).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') became concerned that,
in certain circumstances, in the event a Non-FLEX Option is listed with
identical terms to an existing FLEX Option, OCC could not net the
positions in the contracts until the next business day. If the Non-FLEX
Option were listed intra-day, and an investor with a position in the
FLEX Option attempted to close the position using the Non-FLEX Option,
the investor would be technically long in one contract and short in the
other contract. This would expose the investor to assignment risk until
the next day despite having offsetting positions.
    The limited circumstances are:
     The Non-FLEX Option is listed intra-day.
     The FLEX contract is for American-style exercise.
     All other terms are identical and the contracts are
otherwise fungible.
    The risk does not occur in expiration Friday FLEX Option positions
during the five days prior to expiration, as no new Non-FLEX Option
series may be listed within five days of expiration. It also does not
exist for FLEX Option positions that will be identical to Non-FLEX
series to be added after expiration, as those new series are added
``overnight'' and OCC will convert the FLEX position to the Non-FLEX
Option series at the time the Non-FLEX series is created. In addition,
it does not exist for FLEX Options positions that have a European-
Capped-style exercise, as there are no Non-FLEX European-Capped-style
options currently traded on CBOE. Further, it does not exist for most
FLEX Index Options listed on CBOE, as most Non-FLEX Index options
currently traded on CBOE are European-style exercise, and thus the Non-
FLEX Index Options cannot be exercised on the day the series is listed.
The only exception is Non-FLEX, American-style options on the S&P 100
(OEX).
    As an example, suppose underlying issue XYZ, trading around $25 per
share, has options listed on the March cycle, and in February an
investor wishes to buy just-out-of-the-money call options that expire
in May. Since the Non-FLEX May Options will not be listed until after
the March expiration, the investor enters a FLEX Option order in
February to buy 250 Call 30 options expiring on the third Friday of
May. If, as expected, the Non-FLEX May 30 call options are listed on
the Monday after March expiration, the investor's open FLEX position
will be converted by OCC over the weekend following March expiration to
the Non-FLEX series.
    However, if XYZ stock should decline between the time of the FLEX
transaction and March expiration, the May 30 calls may not be added
after March expiration. If that were to occur, the May 30 calls may be
added sometime later. Suppose the Exchange receives a request to add
the May 30 calls on the morning of the Wednesday after expiration, and
the Exchange lists them immediately. The investor with the FLEX
position may then decide it is an opportune time to close his position.
    Under the current rules, the investor would be required to close
the position by entering a sell order in the new Non-FLEX Option
series. However, when the Non-FLEX transaction is reported to OCC, the
investor is considered short in the Non-FLEX Option series, and is
still long in the FLEX Option. OCC cannot aggregate the FLEX positions
into the Non-FLEX series until after exercise and assignment
processing. If a buyer in the new Non-FLEX series were to exercise the
options, the original investor who had attempted to close the FLEX
position with an offsetting Non-FLEX trade would be at risk of being
assigned on the technically short Non-FLEX position.
    Because of this risk, OCC will not clear an American-style
expiration Friday FLEX option. The Exchange has spoken with OCC and OCC
has agreed that allowing an option position in a FLEX contract to be
closed using a FLEX Option in such circumstances will mitigate the
risk.
    The assignment risk does not exist if the Non-FLEX Option is to be
added the next trading day. In situations where OCC is aware that a
series will be added overnight, they can convert the FLEX position to a
Non-FLEX position before the next trading day. However, OCC cannot
guarantee that an identical Non-FLEX series will not be added intra-
day, and thus will not clear such American-style FLEX Options.
    CBOE is proposing a limited exception to the requirement that the
trading in such options be under the Non-FLEX trading procedures. The
Exchange proposes that, in the event a Non-FLEX Option is listed intra-
day, a FLEX Option position with identical terms could be closed under
the FLEX trading procedures, but only for the balance of the trading
day on which the series is added. Under the proposed rule change, both
sides of the FLEX transaction would have to be closing only positions.
    This change will allow a FLEX Option to be traded in such a manner
to mitigate assignment risk.
    A FLEX Post Official (also referred to in the rules as simply a
``FLEX

Official'') \4\ has the regulatory responsibility for reviewing the
conformity of FLEX trades to the terms and specifications contained in
Rule 24A.4 or 24B.4, as applicable. In the event a Non-FLEX series,
having the same terms as an existing expiration Friday FLEX Option, is
listed intra-day, the FLEX Official will review any subsequent FLEX
transactions in that series and verify that the transaction is being
executed for the purpose of closing out an existing FLEX position. In
addition:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ FLEX Officials are Exchange employees or independent
contractors designated pursuant to Rule 24A.12 or 24B.14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     With respect to FLEX trades occurring on the Chapter XXIVA
FLEX trading platform, should such trading platform be used by the
Exchange,\5\ the FLEX Official will not disseminate a FLEX Request for
Quote for any order representing a FLEX series having the same terms as
a Non-FLEX series, unless such FLEX Order is a closing order (and it is
the day the Non-FLEX series has been added). Additionally, if the FLEX
Official were to disseminate a FLEX Request for Quotes for a closing
order representing a FLEX series having the same terms as a Non-FLEX
series, the FLEX Official would only accept response quotes and orders
that were closing out an existing FLEX position.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Currently CBOE's Chapter XXIVA FLEX trading platform is not
utilized by the Exchange. Instead, all FLEX Options are currently
traded on CBOE's Chapter XXIVB FLEX trading platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     With respect to FLEX trades occurring on the Chapter XXIVB
FLEX trading platform, the FLEX Official will make an announcement that
the FLEX series is now restricted to closing transactions; a FLEX
Request for Quotes may not be disseminated for any order representing a
FLEX series having the same terms as a Non-FLEX series, unless such
FLEX Order is a closing order (and it is the day the Non-FLEX series
has been added); and only responses that were closing out an existing
FLEX position would be permitted. Any transactions that occur that do
not conform to these requirements would be nullified by the FLEX
Official pursuant to Rule 24B.14.
    The CBOE Department of Regulation reviews FLEX trading activity,
and, in the event a Non-FLEX series with the same terms as an
expiration Friday FLEX option is listed intra-day, will review any
subsequent FLEX transactions in the series to verify that they are
closing a position.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act \6\ and the rules and regulations thereunder and, in
particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\7\
Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) \8\ in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts, to remove impediments to and to perfect the
mechanism for a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest, by giving
CBOE Trading Permit Holders and investors additional tools to trade
customized options in an exchange environment while allowing a FLEX
position to be traded in such a manner as to mitigate inadvertent
assignment risk.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposal.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing rule does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of investors
and the public interest, provided that the self-regulatory organization
has given the Commission written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission, the proposed rule change has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires that a self-regulatory organization submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that the Exchange has satisfied
this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\11\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal
may become operative immediately upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that the proposed rule change is substantially
similar to a proposed rule change previously submitted by NYSE Arca
which was published for notice and comment in the Federal Register.\12\
The Commission notes that it did not receive any comments on the NYSE
Arca proposal, and does not believe the CBOE's proposal raises any new
or novel issues. Further, as noted above, because of the inadvertent
assignment risk, market participants could not trade previously
approved American style FLEX Options expiring on Expiration Friday.\13\
The proposal seeks to mitigate such assignment risks by limiting
certain FLEX transactions to closing only, thereby allowing the trading
of previously approved FLEX Options. For these reasons, the Commission
believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest and therefore,
designates the proposed rule change operative upon filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62321 (June 17,
2010), 75 FR 36130 (June 24, 2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-46).
    \13\ See supra note 5.
    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule

change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2010-078 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2010-078. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-CBOE-2010-078 and should be
submitted on or before October 6, 2010

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-22947 Filed 9-14-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 24, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 49258]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23059]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2017-83]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of Federal Aviation Regulations. The
purpose of this notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and
participation in, this aspect of the FAA's regulatory activities.
Neither publication of this notice nor the inclusion or omission of
information in the summary is intended to affect the legal status of
the petition or its final disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number involved and must be received on or before November 13, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2017-0919
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to http://www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
http://www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140
of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynette Mitterer, AIR-673, Federal
Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356,
email [email protected], phone<PHONE_NUMBER>; or Alphonso
Pendergrass, ARM-200, Office of Rulemaking, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591,
email [email protected], phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

Suzanne Masterson,
Acting Manager, Transport Standards Branch.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2017-0919.
    Petitioner: Bombardier Aerospace.
    Section of 14 CFR Affected: Sec.  25.901(c).
    Description of Relief Sought: Bombardier Aerospace is
petitioning for an exemption to 14 CFR 25.901(c) for single failures
of the Throttle Quadrant Assembly (TQA) and the Propulsion control
system that result in Uncontrollable High Thrust (UHT). The
Bombardier Model BD-700-2A12 and BD-700-2A13 Series airplanes
(Global 7000 and Global 8000, respectively) may not be controllable
under certain landing and takeoff scenarios during a UHT event that
occurs in crosswinds in excess of 15 knots.

[FR Doc. 2017-23059 Filed 10-23-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


MEMORANDUM

DATE:   August 6, 2010

FROM:  Keith Barnett, EPA/OAR/OAQPS/SPPD/MMG

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0877, Standards of Performance for Portland
Cement Plants

SUBJECT:   Incorporation by reference of Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0051,
National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Portland
Cement Manufacturing.

Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0051 contains information that is relevant to the
Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants rulemaking and
Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0051 is incorporated by reference into this
docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0877.


			  UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

		        DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

			  OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

			          WASHINGTON, D.C.

Issued by the Department of Transportation on April 9, 2004

NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-2000-7287

________________________________________________________________________
_____________This serves as notice to the public of the action described
below, taken by the Department official indicated (no additional
confirming order will be issued in this matter).

Application of  MIDWEST AIRLINES, INC.,  filed 12/23/2003 to:

XX  Renew for two years exemption under 49 U.S.C. §40109 to provide the
following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail
between any point or points in the United States and any point or points
in Canada.

Applicant rep: Robert P. Silverberg<PHONE_NUMBER>  DOT Analyst: Gerald
Caolo<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (Subject to conditions, see below)

The above action was effective when taken: April 9, 2004, through April
9, 2006, or until 90 days after final Department action on a
corresponding certificate application, whichever occurs earlier.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

                               Office of International Aviation

XX   The authority granted is consistent with the aviation agreement
between the United States and Canada.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:

		XX  Holder’s certificates of public convenience and necessity

		XX  Standard Exemption Conditions (attached)

________________________________________________________________________
_____________

Remarks: The authority for which Midwest Airlines requested renewal
expired March 4, 2004, but had been kept in force pursuant to the
provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c), as
implemented by 14 CFR Part 377, pending action on its timely-filed
renewal application.

Conditions:  The code-share operations conducted under this
authorization are subject to the following conditions:

 The code-sharing operations conducted under this authority must comply
with 14 CFR 257 and with any amendment to the Department’s regulations
concerning code-share arrangements that may be adopted.  Notwithstanding
any provisions in the contract between the carriers, our approval here
is expressly conditioned upon the requirements that the subject foreign
air transportation be sold in the name of the carrier holding out such
service in computer reservation systems and elsewhere; that the carrier
selling such transportation (i.e., the carrier shown on the ticket)
accept responsibility for the entirety of the code-share journey for all
obligations established in its contract of carriage with the passenger;
and that the passenger liability of the operating carrier be unaffected;
and

 The authority granted here is specifically conditioned so that neither
Midwest Airlines nor Skyway Airlines shall give any force or effect to
any contractual provisions between themselves that are contrary to these
conditions.

________________________________________________________________________
_____________

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department’s regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our action was consistent with Department
policy; (2) grant of the exemption was consistent with the public
interest; and (3) grant of the authority would not constitute a major
regulatory action under the Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.
To the extent not granted, we denied all requests in the referenced
Docket.  We may amend, modify, or revoke the authority granted in this
Notice at any time without hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR §
385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date of
issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and the
filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this order is available on the World Wide Web
at

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_ aviation.asp

U.S. Carrier Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of the operations authorized, the U.S. carrier
applicant(s) shall:

(1) Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2) Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3) Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4) Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5) Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6) Comply with all applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration and with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security.  To assure compliance with all applicable U.S.
Government requirements concerning security, the holder shall, before
commencing any new service (including charter flights) to or from a
foreign airport, contact its Principal Security Inspector (PSI) to
advise the PSI of its plans and to find out whether the Transportation
Security Administration has determined that security is adequate to
allow such airport(s) to be served; and

(7) Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and limitations
required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the Department
of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations of other
U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the United
States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

08/2003

 Midwest Airlines was previously known as Midwest Express Airlines.  The
Department subsequently reissued its certificate in its new corporate
name, Midwest Airlines.  Order 2003-2-15, issued February 21, 2003.

 Midwest states that it is currently providing service only between
Milwaukee and Toronto under a code-share arrangement with its affiliate
Skyway Airlines.  However, Midwest states that it wants the opportunity
to provide service to Canada either directly or through a code-share
arrangement.

 PAGE

  PAGE  3


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 196 (Thursday, October 14, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 57164]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22392]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4609-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2021-0001]

Tennessee; Amendment No. 3 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Tennessee (FEMA-4609-DR), dated August 23, 2021, and
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued September 1, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Tennessee is hereby amended to include Public
Assistance for the following areas determined to have been adversely
affected by the event declared a major disaster by the President in his
declaration of August 23, 2021.

    Dickson and Houston Counties for all categories of Public
Assistance (already designated for Individual Assistance).
    Hickman and Humphreys Counties for Public Assistance [Categories
C-G] (already designated for Individual Assistance and debris
removal [Category A] and emergency protective measures [Category B],
including direct federal assistance, under the Public Assistance
program).

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2021-22392 Filed 10-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


Presidential Documents 43255 Federal Register Vol. 64, No. 153 Tuesday, August 10, 1999 Title 3   The President Executive Order 13132 of August 4, 1999 Federalism By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to guarantee the division of governmental responsibilities between the national government and the States that was intended by the Framers of the Constitution, to ensure that the principles of federalism established by the Framers guide the execu tive departments and agencies in the formulation and implementation of policies, and to further the policies of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Definitions.

For purposes of this order:

( a) `` Policies that have federalism implications'' refers to regulations, legis lative comments or proposed legislation, and other policy statements or actions that have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

( b) `` State'' or `` States'' refer to the States of the United States of America, individually or collectively, and, where relevant, to State governments, in cluding units of local government and other political subdivisions established by the States.

( c) `` Agency'' means any authority of the United States that is an `` agency'' under 44 U. S. C. 3502( 1), other than those considered to be independent regulatory agencies, as defined in 44 U. S. C. 3502( 5). ( d) `` State and local officials'' means elected officials of State and local governments or their representative national organizations.

Sec. 2. Fundamental Federalism Principles.

In formulating and implementing policies that have federalism implications, agencies shall be guided by the following fundamental federalism principles:

( a) Federalism is rooted in the belief that issues that are not national in scope or significance are most appropriately addressed by the level of government closest to the people.

( b) The people of the States created the national government and delegated to it enumerated governmental powers. All other sovereign powers, save those expressly prohibited the States by the Constitution, are reserved to the States or to the people.

( c) The constitutional relationship among sovereign governments, State and national, is inherent in the very structure of the Constitution and is formalized in and protected by the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution.

( d) The people of the States are free, subject only to restrictions in the Constitution itself or in constitutionally authorized Acts of Congress, to define the moral, political, and legal character of their lives.

( e) The Framers recognized that the States possess unique authorities, qualities, and abilities to meet the needs of the people and should function as laboratories of democracy.

[ 43256 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 10, 1999 / Presidential Documents]

( f) The nature of our constitutional system encourages a healthy diversity in the public policies adopted by the people of the several States according to their own conditions, needs, and desires. In the search for enlightened public policy, individual States and communities are free to experiment with a variety of approaches to public issues. One size fits all approaches to public policy problems can inhibit the creation of effective solutions to those problems.

( g) Acts of the national government   whether legislative, executive, or judicial in nature   that exceed the enumerated powers of that government under the Constitution violate the principle of federalism established by the Framers. ( h) Policies of the national government should recognize the responsibility of   and should encourage opportunities for   individuals, families, neighbor hoods, local governments, and private associations to achieve their personal, social, and economic objectives through cooperative effort.

( i) The national government should be deferential to the States when taking action that affects the policymaking discretion of the States and should act only with the greatest caution where State or local governments have identified uncertainties regarding the constitutional or statutory author ity of the national government.

Sec. 3. Federalism Policymaking Criteria.

In addition to adhering to the fundamental federalism principles set forth in section 2, agencies shall adhere, to the extent permitted by law, to the following criteria when formu lating and implementing policies that have federalism implications:

( a) There shall be strict adherence to constitutional principles. Agencies shall closely examine the constitutional and statutory authority supporting any action that would limit the policymaking discretion of the States and shall carefully assess the necessity for such action. To the extent practicable, State and local officials shall be consulted before any such action is imple mented. Executive Order 12372 of July 14, 1982 (`` Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs'') remains in effect for the programs and activities to which it is applicable.

( b) National action limiting the policymaking discretion of the States shall be taken only where there is constitutional and statutory authority for the action and the national activity is appropriate in light of the presence of a problem of national significance. Where there are significant uncertainties as to whether national action is authorized or appropriate, agencies shall consult with appropriate State and local officials to determine whether Fed eral objectives can be attained by other means.

( c) With respect to Federal statutes and regulations administered by the States, the national government shall grant the States the maximum adminis trative discretion possible. Intrusive Federal oversight of State administration is neither necessary nor desirable.

( d) When undertaking to formulate and implement policies that have federalism implications, agencies shall:

( 1) encourage States to develop their own policies to achieve program objectives and to work with appropriate officials in other States;

( 2) where possible, defer to the States to establish standards;

( 3) in determining whether to establish uniform national standards, con sult with appropriate State and local officials as to the need for national standards and any alternatives that would limit the scope of national standards or otherwise preserve State prerogatives and authority; and ( 4) where national standards are required by Federal statutes, consult with appropriate State and local officials in developing those standards.

[ 43257 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 10, 1999 / Presidential Documents]

Sec. 4. Special Requirements for Preemption.

Agencies, in taking action that preempts State law, shall act in strict accordance with governing law.

( a) Agencies shall construe, in regulations and otherwise, a Federal statute to preempt State law only where the statute contains an express preemption provision or there is some other clear evidence that the Congress intended preemption of State law, or where the exercise of State authority conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under the Federal statute.

( b) Where a Federal statute does not preempt State law ( as addressed in subsection ( a) of this section), agencies shall construe any authorization in the statute for the issuance of regulations as authorizing preemption of State law by rulemaking only when the exercise of State authority directly conflicts with the exercise of Federal authority under the Federal statute or there is clear evidence to conclude that the Congress intended the agency to have the authority to preempt State law.

( c) Any regulatory preemption of State law shall be restricted to the minimum level necessary to achieve the objectives of the statute pursuant to which the regulations are promulgated.

( d) When an agency foresees the possibility of a conflict between State law and Federally protected interests within its area of regulatory responsi bility, the agency shall consult, to the extent practicable, with appropriate State and local officials in an effort to avoid such a conflict.

( e) When an agency proposes to act through adjudication or rulemaking to preempt State law, the agency shall provide all affected State and local officials notice and an opportunity for appropriate participation in the pro ceedings. Sec. 5. Special Requirements for Legislative Proposals.

Agencies shall not submit to the Congress legislation that would:

( a) directly regulate the States in ways that would either interfere with functions essential to the States' separate and independent existence or be inconsistent with the fundamental federalism principles in section 2;

( b) attach to Federal grants conditions that are not reasonably related to the purpose of the grant; or ( c) preempt State law, unless preemption is consistent with the funda mental federalism principles set forth in section 2, and unless a clearly legitimate national purpose, consistent with the federalism policymaking criteria set forth in section 3, cannot otherwise be met.

Sec. 6. Consultation.

( a) Each agency shall have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications. Within 90 days after the effective date of this order, the head of each agency shall designate an official with principal responsibility for the agency's implementation of this order and that designated official shall submit to the Office of Management and Budget a description of the agency's consultation process.

( b) To the extent practicable and permitted by law, no agency shall promul gate any regulation that has federalism implications, that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on State and local governments, and that is not required by statute, unless:

( 1) funds necessary to pay the direct costs incurred by the State and local governments in complying with the regulation are provided by the Federal Government; or ( 2) the agency, prior to the formal promulgation of the regulation,

( A) consulted with State and local officials early in the process of developing the proposed regulation;

[ 43258 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 10, 1999 / Presidential Documents]

( B) in a separately identified portion of the preamble to the regula tion as it is to be issued in the Federal Register, provides to the Direc tor of the Office of Management and Budget a federalism summary im pact statement, which consists of a description of the extent of the agency's prior consultation with State and local officials, a summary of the nature of their concerns and the agency's position supporting the need to issue the regulation, and a statement of the extent to which the concerns of State and local officials have been met; and ( C) makes available to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget any written communications submitted to the agency by State and local officials.

( c) To the extent practicable and permitted by law, no agency shall promul gate any regulation that has federalism implications and that preempts State law, unless the agency, prior to the formal promulgation of the regulation,

( 1) consulted with State and local officials early in the process of devel oping the proposed regulation;

( 2) in a separately identified portion of the preamble to the regulation as it is to be issued in the Federal Register, provides to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget a federalism summary impact statement, which consists of a description of the extent of the agency's prior consultation with State and local officials, a summary of the nature of their concerns and the agency's position supporting the need to issue the regulation, and a statement of the extent to which the concerns of State and local officials have been met; and ( 3) makes available to the Director of the Office of Management and Budget any written communications submitted to the agency by State and local officials.

Sec. 7. Increasing Flexibility for State and Local Waivers.

( a) Agencies shall review the processes under which State and local govern ments apply for waivers of statutory and regulatory requirements and take appropriate steps to streamline those processes.

( b) Each agency shall, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, consider any application by a State for a waiver of statutory or regulatory requirements in connection with any program administered by that agency with a general view toward increasing opportunities for utilizing flexible policy approaches at the State or local level in cases in which the proposed waiver is consistent with applicable Federal policy objectives and is other wise appropriate. ( c) Each agency shall, to the extent practicable and permitted by law, render a decision upon a complete application for a waiver within 120 days of receipt of such application by the agency. If the application for a waiver is not granted, the agency shall provide the applicant with timely written notice of the decision and the reasons therefor.

( d) This section applies only to statutory or regulatory requirements that are discretionary and subject to waiver by the agency.

Sec. 8. Accountability.

( a) In transmitting any draft final regulation that has federalism implica tions to the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to Executive Order 12866 of September 30, 1993, each agency shall include a certification from the official designated to ensure compliance with this order stating that the requirements of this order have been met in a meaningful and timely manner.

( b) In transmitting proposed legislation that has federalism implications to the Office of Management and Budget, each agency shall include a certifi cation from the official designated to ensure compliance with this order that all relevant requirements of this order have been met.

[ 43259 Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 153 / Tuesday, August 10, 1999 / Presidential Documents]

( c) Within 180 days after the effective date of this order, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and the Assistant to the President for Intergovernmental Affairs shall confer with State and local officials to ensure that this order is being properly and effectively implemented.

Sec. 9. Independent Agencies. Independent regulatory agencies are encouraged to comply with the provisions of this order.

Sec. 10. General Provisions.

( a) This order shall supplement but not supersede the requirements con tained in Executive Order 12372 (`` Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs''), Executive Order 12866 (`` Regulatory Planning and Review''), Executive Order 12988 (`` Civil Justice Reform''), and OMB Circular A   19.

( b) Executive Order 12612 (`` Federalism''), Executive Order 12875 (`` En hancing the Intergovernmental Partnership''), Executive Order 13083 (`` Fed eralism''), and Executive Order 13095 (`` Suspension of Executive Order 13083'') are revoked. ( c) This order shall be effective 90 days after the date of this order.

Sec. 11. Judicial Review.

This order is intended only to improve the internal management of the executive branch, and is not intended to create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law by a party against the United States, its agencies, its officers, or any person.

THE WHITE HOUSE, August 4, 1999. [ FR Doc. 99   20729 Filed 8   9   99; 8: 45 am] Billing code 3195   01   P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:As I type this, I have been smoke free for almost two years, The first thing that is needed is more time for comments, 75 days is not enough, it should be extended. The regulations , where you have to submit your flavor and pay a few thousand dollars is a bad idea, it seems you are eliminating the smaller companies and trying to hand over this industry to big tobacco. It would kill all the mom and pop shops that have put their all into excellent liquids. I do agree with making sure that warning labels are on the bottles and that you must be over 18 years of age to use an ecig. It is saving lives, these regulations are going to give the industry back to the companies that we are trying to stay away from.
We should have to be certified to mix liquids, so we can regulate and stop people from making it in their own home, but to submit an application for one flavor, and have to pay for every nic strength is a little crazy, seems that our government is getting a little money hungry.
To take away giving out samples is a little nuts too, how does someone know if that is the flavor for them, if they cant try it before they buy it?
Just know that you will be putting thousands of companies out of business by going forward with these regulations, people should have their right, to decide what they want to put in their body, not the government. You are spending so much time on this, but allowing marijuana to slowly creep its way into our country. Please wake up, thank you for reading this.

I can see a few hundred dollar application fee for flavors, but a few thousand is a little out of the normal, wouldnt you agree.


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 23 (Wednesday, February 4, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 5905-5906]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01281]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0540; Directorate Identifier 2014-NE-10-AD;
Amendment 39-18074; AD 2015-02-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Lycoming Engines Reciprocating Engines
(Type Certificate previously held by Textron Lycoming Division, AVCO
Corporation)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
serial number (S/N) Lycoming Engines reciprocating engines. This AD was
prompted by propeller governor shaft set screws coming loose due to
improper installation. We are issuing this AD to prevent the propeller
governor shaft set screw from coming loose, causing damage to the
engine and damage to the airplane.

DATES: This AD is effective March 11, 2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 11,
2015.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Lycoming Engines, 652 Oliver Street, Williamsport, PA 17701; phone:
800-258-3279; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet: www.lycoming.com/Lycoming/SUPPORT/TechnicalPublications/ServiceBulletins.aspx. You may view this
service information at the FAA, Engine & Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0540; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Norm Perenson, Aerospace Engineer, New
York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Engine & Propeller
Directorate, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; phone:
516-228-7337; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain S/N Lycoming
Engines reciprocating engines. The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on September 11, 2014 (79 FR 54218). The NPRM was prompted by
events of propeller governor shaft set screws coming loose due to
improper installation. If the set screws come loose, the engine may
lose oil resulting in damage to the engine and damage to the airplane.
The NPRM proposed to require application of Loctite 290, or equivalent,
to the threads of the propeller governor shaft set screw at each
installation of the set screw in addition to the peening of crankcase
hole threads. We are issuing this AD to prevent the propeller governor
shaft set screw from coming loose, causing damage to the engine and
damage to the airplane.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (79 FR 54218, September
11, 2014) or on the determination of the cost to the public.
    We did however; find that we directed the use of LocTite 290, a
commercial product by brand name. We changed the AD to remove the
requirement to use any particular brand like LocTite 290, from this AD.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed.

Related Service Information

    We reviewed Lycoming Engines Service Instruction No. 1343B, dated
June 15, 2007. The service instruction describes procedures for
application of sealant for the propeller governor shaft set screw and
the peening of crankcase hole threads. You can find this information at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2014-0540.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect about 2,330 engines installed
on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it will take about
0.1 hours per engine to comply with this AD. The average labor rate is
$85 per hour. Prorated parts life will cost about $1 per engine. Based
on these figures, we estimate the cost of this AD on U.S. operators to
be $22,135.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures

the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority because it addresses
an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on products
identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska to the extent
that it justifies making a regulatory distinction, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2015-02-07 Lycoming Engines (Type Certificate previously held by
Textron Lycoming Division, AVCO Corporation): Amendment 39-18074;
Docket No. FAA-2014-0540; Directorate Identifier 2014-NE-10-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective March 11, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Lycoming Engines wide deck aerobatic
reciprocating engines that have either an ``A'' or an ``E'' at the
end of the serial number (e.g., L-12345-51A, or L-12345-51E) and are
equipped with a front-mounted propeller governor. Affected
reciprocating engine models include, but are not limited to Lycoming
Engines AEIO-320-D1B; AEIO-360-A1E, -A1E6, -B1H, -H1B; AEIO-540-
D4A5, -D4B5, -D4D5, -L1B5, -L1B5D, -L1D5; AEIO-580-B1A; and IO-540-
K1K5 (with aerobatic kit installed).

(d) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by propeller governor shaft set screws
coming loose due to improper installation. We are issuing this AD to
prevent the propeller governor shaft set screw from coming loose,
causing damage to the engine and damage to the airplane.

(e) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
    After the effective date of this AD, at each installation of the
propeller governor shaft set screw, secure the set screw in place in
accordance with the instructions of Lycoming Engines Service
Instruction No. 1343B, dated June 15, 2007. Use a thread-locking,
anaerobic, single-component sealing compound that meets military
specification Mil-S-46163A, Type III, Grade R, and peen the
crankcase hole threads.

(f) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    The Manager, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, may
approve AMOCs to this AD. Use the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19
to make your request.

(g) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Norm Perenson,
Aerospace Engineer, New York Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Engine & Propeller Directorate, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(h) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Lycoming Engines Service Instruction No. 1343B, dated June
15, 2007.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For Lycoming Engines service information identified in this
AD, contact Lycoming Engines, 652 Oliver Street, Williamsport, PA
17701; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet: http://www.lycoming.com/Lycoming/SUPPORT/TechnicalPublications/ServiceInstructions.aspx.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Engine &
Propeller Directorate, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington,
MA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to:
http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on January 13, 2015.
Thomas A. Boudreau,
Acting Directorate Manager, Engine & Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-01281 Filed 2-3-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: March 11, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 46)]
[Notices]
[Page 10645]
[DOCID:fr11mr09-164]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

Agency Information Collection: Activity for OMB Review: Advisory
Committee Candidate Biographical Information Request Form

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, DOT.
Docket: DOT-OST-2009-0054.

ACTION: Notice and request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public
Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the
Information Collection Request, abstracted below, is being forwarded to
the Office of Management and Budget for an extension without change of
currently approved Advisory Committee Candidate Biographical
Information Request Form. A Federal Register Notice with a 60-day
comment period was published on November 18, 2008 (FR Vol. 73, No. 223,
page 68491-68491). The agency did not receive any comments to its
previous notice.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by April 10, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lisa L. Hough, Committee Management
Officer, Executive Secretariat, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 or telephone: (202) 366-
4277.

Comments: Comments should be sent to OMB: Attention DOT/OST Desk
Officer, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20503, or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and should
identify the associated OMB Approval Number 2105-0009 and Docket DOT-
OST-2009-0054.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Approval No.: 2105-0009.
    Title: Advisory Committee Candidate Biographical Information
Request Form.
    Form No.: DOT F1120.1.
    Type of Review: Extension.
    Respondents: Individuals who have contacted DOT to indicate
interest in appointment to and advisory committee and individuals who
have been recommended for membership on an advisory committee. Only one
collection is expected per individual.
    Number of Respondents: 100 Annually.
    Total Annual Burden: 25 hours.
    Needs and Uses: Information is gathered from individuals interested
in appointment to an advisory committee and individuals who have been
recommended for membership on an advisory committee to ensure fair and
balanced membership.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 5, 2009.
Patricia Lawton,
Departmental PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-5162 Filed 3-10-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P