b. Revising paragraph (e)(2)(i); and
    c. Adding as the last sentence of (e)(2)(ii).

Sec.  141.87  Monitoring requirements for water quality parameters.

* * * * *
    (d) Monitoring after State specifies water quality parameter values
for optimal corrosion control. After the State specifies the values for
applicable water quality control parameters reflecting optimal
corrosion control treatment under Sec.  141.82(f), all large systems
shall measure the applicable water quality parameters in accordance
with paragraph (c) of this section and determine compliance with the
requirements of Sec.  141.82(g) every six months with the first six-
month period to begin on either January 1 or July 1, whichever comes
first, after the State specifies the optimal values under Sec.
141.82(f). * * *
    (e) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (i) Any water system that maintains the range of values for the
water quality parameters reflecting optimal corrosion control treatment
specified by the State under Sec.  141.82(f) during three consecutive
years of monitoring may reduce the frequency with which it collects the
number of tap samples for applicable water quality parameters specified
in this paragraph (e)(1) of this section from every six months to
annually. This sampling begins during the calendar year immediately
following the end of the monitoring period in which the third
consecutive year of six-month monitoring occurs. Any water system that
maintains the range of values for the water quality parameters
reflecting optimal corrosion control treatment specified by the State
under Sec.  141.82(f), during three consecutive years of annual
monitoring under this paragraph may reduce the frequency with which it
collects the number of tap samples for applicable water quality
parameters specified in paragraph (e)(1) of this section from annually
to every three years. This sampling begins no later than the third
calendar year following the end of the monitoring period in which the
third consecutive year of monitoring occurs.
    (ii) * * * Monitoring conducted every three years shall be done no
later than every third calendar year.
* * * * *
    9. Section 141.88 is amended as follows by:
    a. Revising paragraph (b);
    b. Adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (d)(1)(i);
    c. Revising paragraph (d)(1)(ii);
    d. Revising paragraph (e)(1) introductory text; and
    e. Revising paragraph (e)(2) introductory text.

Sec.  141.88  Monitoring requirements for lead and copper in source
water.

* * * * *
    (b) Monitoring frequency after system exceeds tap water action
level. Any system which exceeds the lead or copper action level at the
tap shall collect one source water sample from each entry point to the
distribution

system no later than six months after the end of the monitoring period
during which the lead or copper action level was exceeded. For
monitoring periods that are annual or less frequent, the end of the
monitoring period is September 30 of the calendar year in which the
sampling occurs, or if the State has established an alternate
monitoring period, the last day of that period.
* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) * * * Triennial samples shall be collected every third calendar
year.
    (ii) A water system using surface water (or a combination of
surface and groundwater) shall collect samples once during each
calendar year, the first annual monitoring period to begin during the
year in which the applicable State determination is made under
paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) A water system using only ground water may reduce the
monitoring frequency for lead and copper in source water to once during
each nine-year compliance cycle (as that term is defined in Sec.
141.2) provided that the samples are collected no later than every
ninth calendar year and if the system meets one of the following
criteria:
* * * * *
    (2) A water system using surface water (or a combination of surface
water and ground water) may reduce the monitoring frequency in
paragraph (d)(1) of this section to once during each nine-year
compliance cycle (as that term is defined in Sec.  141.2) provided that
the samples are collected no later than every ninth calendar year and
if the system meets one of the following criteria:
* * * * *
    10. Section 141.90 is amended as follows by:
    a. Adding a sentence to the end of paragraph (a)(1);
    b. Revising paragraph (a)(3);
    c. Revising paragraph (e)(1);
    d. Revising paragraph (e)(2) introductory text;
    e. Revising the last sentence of paragraph (e)(2)(ii);
    f. Revising paragraph (f)(1) introductory text; and
    g. Revising paragraph (f)(1)(i).

Sec.  141.90  Reporting requirements.

* * * * *
    (a) * * * (1) For monitoring periods with a duration less than six
months, the end of the monitoring period is the last date samples can
be collected during that period as specified in Sec. Sec.  141.86 and
141.87.
* * * * *
    (3) At a time specified by the State, or if no specific time is
designated by the State, then as early as possible prior to the
addition of a new source or any change in water treatment, a water
system deemed to have optimized corrosion control under Sec.
141.81(b)(3), a water system subject to reduced monitoring pursuant to
Sec.  141.86(d)(4), or a water system subject to a monitoring waiver
pursuant to Sec.  141.86(g), shall send written documentation to the
State describing the change. The State must review and approve the
addition of a new source or change in water treatment before it is
implemented by the water system.
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) No later than 12 months after the end of a monitoring period in
which a system exceeds the Lead Action Level in sampling referred to in
Sec.  141.84(a), the system must submit written documentation to the
State of the material evaluation conducted as required in Sec.
141.86(a), identify the initial number of lead service lines in its
distribution system at the time the system exceeds the Lead Action
Level, and provide the system's schedule for annually replacing at
least 7 percent of the initial number of lead service lines in its
distribution system.
    (2) No later than 12 months after the end of a monitoring period in
which a system exceeds the Lead Action Level in sampling referred to in
Sec.  141.84(a), and every 12 months thereafter, the system shall
demonstrate to the State in writing that the system has either:
    (i) * * *
    (ii) * * * In such cases, the total number of lines replaced and/or
which meet the criteria in Sec.  141.84(c) shall equal at least 7
percent of the initial number of lead lines identified under paragraph
(1) of this section (or the percentage specified by the State under
Sec.  141.84(e)).
* * * * *
    (f) * * * (1) Any water system that is subject to the public
education requirements in Sec.  141.85 shall, within ten days after the
end of each period in which the system is required to perform public
education in accordance with Sec.  141.85(b), send written
documentation to the State that contains:
    (i) A demonstration that the system has delivered the public
education materials that meet the content requirements in Sec.  141.85
(a) and the delivery requirements in Sec.  141.85(b); and
* * * * *
    11. Section 141.154 is amended by revising paragraph (d)
introductory text, paragraph (d)(1) and (d)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  141.154  Required additional health information.

* * * * *
    (d) Systems that detect any level of lead above the method
detection limit of 0.001 mg/L in their drinking water pursuant to
monitoring under Sec.  141.86 must do one of the following:
    (1) Include a short informational statement about the special
effects of lead on children if the system's 90th percentile level is at
or below the Lead Action Level. The statement must include the
following information: ``While our system did not exceed the Lead
Action Level as shown in the table, it is possible that there may be
high lead levels in your home as a result of materials in your home
plumbing. Lead can cause serious health problems, especially for
pregnant women and children 6 and under. If you are concerned about
high lead levels in your home's water, run your water for 30 seconds to
2 minutes before using tap water and have your water tested. Additional
information is available from the National Lead Information Center at
1-800-424-LEAD.'' The system may write its own educational statement,
but only in consultation with the Primacy Agency.
    (2) Include a short informational statement about the special
effects of lead on children if the 90th percentile sample is above the
Lead Action Level. The statement must include the following
information: ``Our system exceeded the Lead Action Level. It is
possible that there may be high lead levels in your home as a result of
materials in your home plumbing. Lead can cause serious health
problems, especially for pregnant women and children 6 and under. If
you are concerned about high lead levels in your home's water, run your
water for 30 seconds to 2 minutes before using tap water and have your
water tested. Additional information is available from the National
Lead Information Center at 1-800-424-LEAD.'' The system may write its
own educational statement, but only in consultation with the Primacy
Agency.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 06-6250 Filed 7-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 40 (Wednesday, February 29, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 12280]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4788]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project Nos. 14189-000, 14198-000]

 Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XL; FFP Project 56, LLC; Notice
Announcing Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit Applications

    On February 22, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine
priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical
filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of
the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop,
conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the
region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as
the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as
follows:
    1. Lock+ Hydro Friends Fund XL, Project No. 14189-000.
    2. FFP Project 56, LLC, Project No. 14198-000.

    Dated: February 22, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-4788 Filed 2-28-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10549-10551]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04296]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-3988; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-130-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series
airplanes; and all Airbus Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -600 series
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by reports of chafing of the
feeder cable at the pylon-wing junction due to vibration; one report
revealed that the cable loom plastic support bracket of the G-route was
broken due to vibration; and another report revealed wire chafing due
to clamp damage. This proposed AD would require modifying the cable
loom support bracket of the G-route of the inboard pylons at the pylon-
wing junction. We are proposing this AD to prevent chafing of the
wiring in the pylon-wing area, which could result in an electrical
short circuit near a flammable fluid vapor zone, and consequent fire or
fuel tank explosion.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 15, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus
SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 45
80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
3988; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-3988;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-130-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2015-0142, dated July 17, 2015 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model
A330-200, -200 Freighter, and

-300 series airplanes; and all Airbus Model A340-200, -300, -500, and -
600 series airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Two events have been reported of feeder cable chafing at the
pylon-wing junction on A330 aeroplanes. Inspection of the affected
area for the first event revealed that the bracket supporting the
cables G-route, made in plastic, was broken. The second event was
due to clamp damage. Failure of support bracket and/or damage of
clamp led to the feeder cables gradually chafing away at the cut-out
edge by vibration. Due to design similarity, A340 aeroplanes are
also affected by this issue.
    This condition, if not corrected, could create a short circuit,
in combination with fuel vapour on [the] ground, possibly resulting
in a fire or explosion.
    To address this unsafe condition, Airbus developed modifications
to be embodied in service through Airbus Service Bulletin (SB) A330-
92-3132, SB A340-92-4100 or SB A340-92-5066, as applicable to
aeroplane type and model.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires the
embodiment of these modifications [of the cable loom support bracket
of the G-route of the inboard pylons ] at the pylon/wing junction in
[left-hand] LH and [right-hand] RH wings.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
3988.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued the following service information:
     Service Bulletin A330-92-3132, Revision 01, dated May 21,
2015.
     Service Bulletin A340-92-4100, Revision 01, dated May 21,
2015.
     Service Bulletin A340-92-5066, dated June 25, 2014.
    The service information describes procedures for modifying the
cable loom support bracket of the G-route of the inboard pylons at the
pylon-wing junction. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 90 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We also estimate that it would take about 8 work-hours per product
to comply with the modification requirements of this proposed AD.
Required parts would cost about $900 per product. The average labor
rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost
for the inspection specified in this proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $142,200, or $1,580 per product.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all costs in our cost
estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2016-3988; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-
130-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by April 15, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
and (c)(2) of this AD, certificated in any category, all
manufacturer serial numbers.
    (1) Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -223F, -243, -243F,
-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes;
except airplanes on which Airbus Modification 203672 has been
embodied in production.
    (2) Airbus Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, -313, -541,
and -642 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 25, Equipment/
Furnishings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of chafing of the feeder cable
at the pylon-wing junction due to vibration; one report revealed
that the cable loom plastic support bracket of the G-route was
broken due to vibration; and another report revealed wire chafing
due to clamp damage. We are issuing this AD to prevent chafing of
the wiring in the pylon-wing area, which could result in an
electrical short circuit near a flammable fluid vapor zone, and
consequent fire or fuel tank explosion.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Modification of the Feeder Cable

    Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD: Modify the
cable loom support bracket of the G-route 7701VB in the left-hand
side of the inboard pylon, and the G-route 7702VB in the right-hand
side of the inboard pylon, located at the pylon-wing junction, in
accordance with the applicable service information specified in
paragraphs (g)(1), (g)(2), and (g)(3) of this AD.
    (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A330-92-3132, Revision 01, dated May
21, 2015.
    (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-92-4100, Revision 01, dated May
21, 2015.
    (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A340-92-5066, dated June 25, 2014.

(h) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the modification required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if the modification was performed before
the effective date of this AD using Airbus Service Bulletin A330-92-
3132, dated June 19, 2014; or Airbus Service Bulletin A340-92-4100,
dated June 19, 2014; as applicable.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information
may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2015-0142, dated July 17, 2015,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2016-3988.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on February 19, 2016.
Dorr M. Anderson,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-04296 Filed 2-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 232 (Tuesday, December 7, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 69351-69352]
[FR Doc No: 2021-26488]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Release From Federal Grant Assurance Obligations and
Land Exchange San Bernardino International Airport, San Bernardino, San
Bernardino County, California

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of request to release airport land.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is considering a
proposal and invites public comment on the application for release of
10.306 acres of airport property from federal Grant Assurance
obligations and land exchange at San Bernardino International Airport,
San Bernardino, California. San Bernardino International Airport
Authority (SBIAA) is requesting a total release from federal
obligations on 10.306 acres of SBIAA property, and to authorize an
acre-for-acre land exchange between SBIAA and the San Manuel Band of
Mission Indians (SMBMI). The property is located approximately 600-feet
south of E 3rd Street, north of W St., and approximately 300-feet east
of Victoria Street and west of U St.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 6, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Comments on the request may be mailed or delivered to the
FAA at the following address: Ms. Cathryn Cason, Manager, Los Angeles
Airports District Office, Federal Aviation Administration, 777 South
Aviation Boulevard, Suite 150, El Segundo, California 90245. In
addition, one copy of the comment submitted to the FAA must be mailed
or delivered to Mr. Mark Gibbs, Director of Aviation, San Bernardino
International Airport Authority, 1601 East 3rd Street, San Bernardino,
CA 92408.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The former Norton Air Force Base property
was conveyed to SBIAA by the United States Air Force (USAF) in
accordance with the Airport Quit Claim Deed as a public benefit
transfer pursuant to the sponsorship of the FAA a public use airport.
SBIAA assumed the operational responsibility of the Airport on October
15, 1993, and received a lease from the USAF in January 1994. The
Airport Quit Claim Deed encompasses the majority of the Airport
properties and was delivered to SBIAA on February 12, 1999. The 10.306-
acres of subject land identified is not currently required for
aeronautical purposes. SBIAA is intending to exchange this property
with the San Manuel Band of Mission Indians (SMBMI) on a 10.306-acre-
for-acre land exchange. Such use of the land represents a compatible
land use that will not interfere with the airport or its operation,
thereby protecting the interests of civil aviation. The resulting
actions would provide the Airport with ownership control over the
primary access road to its general aviation and air cargo areas
(Victoria Avenue). SBIAA needs to ensure that the ownership control of
this primary access road cannot be compromised.
    In accordance with the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and
Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR 21), Public Law 106-181 (Apr. 5,
2000; 114 stat. 61), this notice must be published in the Federal
Register 30 days before the DOT Secretary may waive any condition
imposed on a federally obligated airport by surplus property conveyance
deeds or grant agreements.

    Issued in El Segundo, California on December 2, 2021.
Brian Q. Armstrong,
Manager, Safety and Standards Branch, Airports Division, Western-
Pacific Region.
[FR Doc. 2021-26488 Filed 12-6-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35202-35203]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14964]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP11-495-000]

Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.; Notice of Application

    On June 3, 2011, Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. (Piedmont)
filed with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) an
application pursuant to section 7(f) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA), as
amended, and section 157 of the Commission's Regulations, for service
area determination for their Charlotte, North Carolina and Fort Mill,
South Carolina service areas, all as more fully set forth in the
application, which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. There is an ``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that
enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a document is
added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance, contact FERC at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,
(202) 502-8659.
    Questions regarding this application should be directed to Michelle
R. Mendoza, Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc., Post Office Box 33068,
Charlotte, NC 28233 or by e-mailing<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
to James H. Jeffries IV, Moore & Van Allen PLLC, 100 North Tryon
Street, Suite 4700, Charlotte, NC 28202-4003 or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>
or by e-mailing<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, within 90 days
of this Notice the Commission staff will either: complete its
environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the Commission's public
record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule for Environmental
Review is issued, it will indicate, among other milestones, the
anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS) or EA for this proposal. The
filing of the EA in the Commission's public record for this proceeding
or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review will
serve to notify Federal and state agencies of the timing for the
completion of all necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to
complete all Federal authorizations within 90 days of the date of
issuance of the Commission staff's FEIS or EA.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below, file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit seven copies of filings made with the Commission and must mail a
copy to the applicant and to every other party in the proceeding. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenters will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commenters will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.

    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit original and seven copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Comment Date: July 1, 2011.

    Dated: June 10, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-14964 Filed 6-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P