[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 77 (Tuesday, April 22, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22418-22419]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09010]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 180

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0791; FRL-9908-83]

Linuron; Pesticide Tolerances; Technical Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule; technical correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a final rule in the Federal Register of February
12, 2014, concerning the establishment of tolerances for residues of
linuron in or on multiple commodities and the removal of a tolerance
with regional registrations in or on parsley leaves. This document
corrects an error in the listing of the registrant associated with this
action.

DATES: This final rule correction is effective April 22, 2014.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0791, is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lois Rossi, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Does this action apply to me?

    The Agency included in the final rule published in the Federal
Register of February 12, 2014 (79 FR 8301) (FRL-9905-22) a list of
those who may be potentially affected by this action.

II. What does this technical correction do?

    EPA issued a final rule in the Federal Register of February 12,
2014, that established tolerances for residues of linuron in or on
multiple commodities and removed a tolerance with regional
registrations in or on parsley leaves. EPA inadvertently listed the
incorrect registrant associated with this action as Syngenta Crop
Protection, LLC, in Unit II. Summary of Petitioned-for Tolerance. The
correct registrant associated with this action is Tessenderlo Kerley,
Inc. The same incorrect registrant's name appears in the notice of
receipt associated with this regulatory action, which published in the
Federal Register of November 7, 2012 (77 FR 66832) (FRL-9523-9).
    The preamble for FR Doc. 2014-03077, published in the Federal
Register of February 12, 2014 (79 FR 8301) is corrected as follows:
    On page 8302, under the heading ``II. Summary of Petitioned-for
Tolerance,'' second column, first full paragraph, line 22, correct
``Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC'' to read ``Tessenderlo Kerley, Inc.''.

III. Why is this correction issued as a final rule?

    Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C.
553(b)(3)(B)) provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a final rule without
providing notice and an opportunity for public comment. EPA has
determined that there is good cause for making this technical
correction final without prior proposal and opportunity for comment,
because the technical amendment serves only to correct the registrant
that is listed as having prepared a summary of the petition associated
with the final rule. EPA finds that this constitutes good cause under 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).

IV. Do any of the statutory and Executive Order reviews apply to this
action?

    No. For a detailed discussion concerning the statutory and
executive order review, refer to ``Unit VII. Statutory and Executive
Order Reviews'' of the February 12, 2014 final rule.

V. Congressional Review Act

    Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: April 14, 2014.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-09010 Filed 4-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 61 (Monday, March 31, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18118-18119]
[FR Doc No: 2014-07075]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2014-0018]

Pipeline Safety: Information Collection Activities, Revisions to
Operator Identification (OPID) Assignment Request and Operator Registry
Notification

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) invites
comments on its intention to revise two forms, PHMSA F 1000.1--OPID
Assignment Request and PHMSA F 1000.2--Operator Registry Notification,
and its intention to request approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for revised information collection burdens.

DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
May 30, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted in the following ways:
    E-Gov Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. This site allows the
public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice issued by any
agency.
    Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of Transportation
(DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    Hand Delivery: Room W12-140 on the ground level of DOT, West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Identify the docket number, PHMSA-2014-0018, at the
beginning of your comments. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. You should know that anyone is able to
search the electronic form of all comments received into any of our
dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). Therefore, you may want to review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000, (65 FR 19477) or visit http://www.regulations.gov
before submitting any such comments.
    Docket: For access to the docket or to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to Room W12-
140 on the ground level of DOT, West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE., Washington, DC, between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. If you wish to receive confirmation of
receipt of your written comments, please include a self-addressed,
stamped postcard with the following statement: ``Comments on: PHMSA-
2014-0018.'' The Docket Clerk will date stamp the postcard prior to
returning it to you via the U.S. mail. Please note that due to delays
in the delivery of U.S. mail to Federal offices in Washington, DC, we
recommend that persons consider an alternative method (internet, fax,
or professional delivery service) of submitting comments to the docket
and ensuring their timely receipt at DOT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Dow by telephone at 202-366-
1246, by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>by fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
mail at DOT, PHMSA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., PHP-30, Washington, DC
20590-0001.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 1320.8(d), Title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
requires PHMSA to provide interested members of the public and affected
agencies an opportunity to comment on information collection and
recordkeeping requests. This notice identifies a revised information
collection request that PHMSA will be submitting to OMB for approval.
The information collected from OPID Assignment Request forms and
Operator Registry Notification forms is an important tool for
identifying new operators and changes to existing pipeline systems as
set forth in 49 CFR 191.22 and 195.64.

A. Proposed Changes to the OPID Request Form

    PHMSA is proposing to revise the OPID Assignment Request Form
(PHMSA F 1000.1) to:
    (1) Align the gas distribution and gas transmission commodity
choices with those found on the annual and incident reports. Consistent
commodity categories across all report forms would enhance PHMSA and
our state partners' understanding of gas pipeline facilities.
    (2) Modify the list for types of gas distribution operators to
reflect the ownership structure of the operator. The current list is a
mix of ownership structure and commodity. Commodity values are entered
elsewhere on the form. This change would allow PHMSA and our state
partners to better determine ownership structure without commodity data
mixed in to ensure regulatory efforts are directed to the proper
entities.
    (3) Collect the miles of pipe and facility descriptions for each
state. PHMSA and our state partners would gain a better understanding
of the new operators' pipeline facilities through this state-by-state
reporting.
    (4) Eliminate liquefied natural gas (LNG) plans and procedures as a
separate safety program type. LNG plans and procedures are equivalent
to the operating, maintenance, and emergencies program type. The
pipeline system types (i.e., LNG, gas distribution, hazardous liquid,
etc.) are collected elsewhere on the form. This change would remove a
redundancy from this form.
    (5) Collect business cell phone numbers for contacts in addition to
office phone numbers. Having both phone numbers would enhance the
ability of PHMSA and our state partners to communicate with new
operators.
    Several changes are proposed for the instructions to enable the
changes listed above, provide additional clarity, and reflect that the
validation process has ended. These changes would allow operators to
complete the form quickly and accurately.

B. Proposed Changes to the Operator Registry Notification

    PHMSA is proposing to revise the Operator Registry Notification
Form (PHMSA F 1000.2) to:
    (1) Remove and revise instructions regarding pipeline safety
program information submissions at several locations in the form and
instructions. For example, over the past year, PHMSA has found many
operators erroneously submitted Type C notifications based on these
confusing instructions. These revisions would help operators avoid
submitting unnecessary notifications that must later be retracted.
    (2) Reduce the number of notification types and the text describing
each type to enhance clarity. The current form provides a type for each
regulatory requirement for notification submission. Instead of
selecting one of three types for gas or liquid construction, we are
proposing a single type. Details about the construction project are
collected in Step 3 of the form. This would reduce

operator confusion about which notification type should be submitted
and eliminate a needless distinction in PHMSA's data.
    (3) Require Type B notifications to indicate whether the operator
is assuming or ceasing operatorship of pipeline facilities. PHMSA has
to rely on the ``reason for change'' text field to determine which
applies to the Type B notifications submitted to date. In some cases,
the text field does not explain the type of change. This change would
require operators to submit the information needed by PHMSA to process
the operator's notification properly.
    (4) Require separate notifications for an acquisition and a
divestiture. Only one set of gas distribution pipeline facilities can
be reported in Step 3 of the current form. If an operator were to
select both acquisition and divestiture in Step 2, we would not know
which gas distribution pipeline facilities were acquired and which were
divested. In Step 3, gas gathering, gas transmission, and hazardous
liquid pipeline facilities can be reported as acquired or divested. By
restricting each notification to either acquisition or divestiture, we
can eliminate half of the data fields required for gas gathering, gas
transmission, and hazardous liquid pipeline facilities in Step 3 and
insure that we are interpreting an operator's notification accurately.
    (5) Allow an operator submitting a divestiture to request the
deactivation of their OPID. If an operator no longer has regulated
pipeline facilities, PHMSA deactivates the OPID. This informs our
internal staff and our state partners that the OPID is no longer
responsible for any regulated pipeline facilities. Under the current
form and instructions, such operators are encouraged to contact PHMSA
regarding deactivation. Including the ability to request deactivation
in the notification would result in more efficient communication about
operators with no remaining regulated pipeline facilities.
    (6) Align the gas distribution and gas transmission commodity
choices with those found on the annual and incident reports. Consistent
commodity categories across all report forms would enhance PHMSA's and
our state partners' understanding of gas pipeline facilities.
    (7) Collect data about miles of pipeline separate from facilities,
such as breakout tanks, storage fields, and compressor stations, in
Step 3. This change is proposed in conjunction with reducing the number
of construction notification types. Instead of selecting a type
corresponding to facilities, the operator would select the ``generic''
construction type and provide data about the facilities in Step 3.
Under the current form, two separate notifications would be required.
This change would allow an operator to submit a single construction
notification for both pipeline miles and facilities, making compliance
easier for operators.
    (8) Require operators to provide data about pipeline facilities
(Step 3) when they submit a change in entity operating (Type B)
notification. Currently, an operator provides notification of a change
in the entity operating but submits no information about the pipeline
facilities affected by the change. By collecting pipeline facility
information, PHMSA and our state partners would understand the scope of
the operating entity change.
    (9) Collect the miles of pipe and facility descriptions for each
state. PHMSA and our state partners would gain a better understanding
of the pipeline facilities covered by a notification through this
state-by-state reporting.
    Several changes are proposed for the instructions to enable the
changes listed above and provide additional clarity.
    (10) Add a ``Guidance for Selecting the Appropriate Notification
Type'' section to the instructions. The current instructions, both on
the form and in the instruction document, have resulted in many
operators submitting the incorrect type of notification. The new
section summarizes the purpose of notification types and contains flow
charts to guide operators to the correct type of notification based on
the action they are taking. This new section would eliminate wasted
time for operators submitting unnecessary notifications and needless
PHMSA reviews.

II. Summary of Impacted Collection

    The following information is provided for this information
collection: (1) Title of the information collection; (2) OMB control
number; (3) Current expiration date; (4) Type of request; (5) Abstract
of the information collection activity; (6) Description of affected
public; (7) Estimate of total annual reporting and recordkeeping
burden; and (8) Frequency of collection. PHMSA requests comments on the
following information collection, including the proposed revisions
addressed in this notice. Copies of the proposed forms associated with
this information collection can be found in Docket Number PHMSA-2014-
0018.
    Title: National Registry of Pipeline and LNG Operators.
    OMB Control Number: 2137-0627.
    Current Expiration Date: 12/31/2014.
    Type of Request: Revision.
    Abstract: The National Registry of Pipeline and LNG Operators
serves as the storehouse for the reporting requirements for an operator
regulated or subject to reporting requirements under 49 CFR Parts 192,
193, or 195. PHMSA is seeking to revise the forms associated with
assigning and maintaining OPID information, the Operator Assignment
Request Form (PHMSA F 1000.1) and the Operator Registry Notification
Form (PHMSA F 1000.2).
    Affected Public: Natural gas, LNG, and liquid pipeline operators.
    Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
    Total Annual Responses: 630.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 630.
    Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
    Comments are invited on:
    (a) The need for the proposed collection of information for the
proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether
the information will have practical utility;
    (b) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
    (c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
    (d) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques.

    Issued in Washington, DC on March 26, 2014.
Alan K. Mayberry,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Programs.
[FR Doc. 2014-07075 Filed 3-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P