Recordkeeping and Periodic Reporting of the Production, Import,
Recycling, Destruction, Transhipment, and Feedstock Use of
Ozone-Depleting Substances (Rewewal)

PART A OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT

1. Identification of the Information Collection

(a) 	Title: 			Recordkeeping and Periodic Reporting of the Production,
Import,

Recycling, Destruction, Transhipment, and Feedstock Use of
Ozone-Depleting Substances (Renewal)

	OMB Number:	2060-0170

	EPA ICR Number:	1432.29

(b) 	Short Characterization

	  SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 The international treaty The Montreal Protocol on
Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (Protocol) and Title VI of the
Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 (CAA) established limits on total U.S.
production, import, and export of Class I and Class II controlled ozone
depleting substances (ODSs).  Under its Protocol commitments, the United
States has been obligated to cease production and import of Class I
controlled substances with exemptions for essential uses, critical uses,
previously used material, and material that will be transformed,
destroyed, or exported to developing countries.  The Protocol also
establishes limits and reduction schedules leading to the eventual
phaseout of Class II controlled substances with similar exemptions
beyond the phaseout.  Additionally, the CAA has its own limits on
production and consumption of controlled substances that EPA must adhere
to and enforce.

To ensure the United States’ compliance with the limits and
restrictions established by the Protocol and the CAA, the ODS phaseout
regulations establish control measures for individual companies.  EPA
monitors compliance with the limits and restrictions for individual
United States companies through the recordkeeping and reporting
requirements established in the regulations at 40 CFR part 82, subpart
A.  To submit required information, regulated entities can download
reporting forms from EPA’s stratospheric ozone web site
(http://www.epa.gov/ozone/record/index.html), complete them, and then
send them to EPA via U.S. Mail or fax.  Upon receipt of the reports, EPA
enters and stores the data in the ODS Tracking System.  The Tracking
System is a secure database that maintains all of the data that is
submitted to EPA and allows the Agency to:  (1) maintain control over
total production and consumption of controlled substances to satisfy
conditions of the CAA and fulfill the United States obligations under
the Protocol; (2) monitor compliance with limits and restrictions on
production, imports, exports, and specific exemptions to the phaseout
for individual U.S. companies; and (3) enforce against illegal imports
and violations related to the control of Class I and Class II
substances.  Additionally, reporting on the exemptions allows an entity
to retain the benefit of being able to produce or import a controlled
Class I ODS beyond the date of complete phaseout.

In 2008, EPA begun using an electronic reporting system for Class I
(except methyl bromide) producers, importers, and exporters.  The
electronic reporting system operates through the Agency’s Central Data
Exchange (CDX) and allows regulated entities to download, complete, and
submit reports electronically.  Electronic reporting can reduce time and
resources spent fulfilling reporting requirements, reduce the use of
paper, and improve the quality of the data.

Pursuant to regulations 40 CFR part 2, subpart B, reporting businesses
are entitled to assert a business confidentiality claim covering any
part of the submitted business information as defined in 40 CFR
2.201(c).

	Detailed burden and costs calculations for respondents and the Agency
are presented in Section 6 of this document.  The burden and cost
estimates for respondents decreased in this ICR because previous
estimates for certifications was much higher than the Agency’s
experience has shown it to be.  These certifications are for the
quarantine and preshipment (QPS) use of methyl bromide and laboratory
use of Class I substances.  Increases in the average hourly wage rate
for industry caused by normal inflation contributed to higher respondent
costs.  EPA also refined its estimates based on more recent information
from respondents.

The burden and cost estimates for the Agency decreased largely because
the regulatory program has been in effect for several years and EPA has
already instituted mechanisms to process information submitted.  As EPA
expands the use of electronic reporting via the Agency’s CDX to
additional segments of the regulated community, EPA expects burden and
costs to further decline.  EPA anticipated that when the CDX system
becomes fully utilized, all required data will be submitted and tracked
electronically, thus reducing and/or eliminating reporting by paper.

2. Need For, and Use Of, the Collection

(a)	Authority for the Collection

This information collection is authorized under the Section 603(b) of
the Clean Air Act and Article 7 of the Protocol.  Section 603(b) of the
Clean Air Act, “Production, import, and export level reports,”
mandates that each person who produces, imports, or exports a Class I
controlled substance file a report stating the amount of the substance
that was produced, imported, and exported by that person during the
preceding reporting period.  Article 7 of the Protocol, “Reporting of
data,” requires the United States to provide specific data annually on
its production, imports, and exports of each controlled substance.

(b)	Practical Utility/Users of the Data

	The reporting and recordkeeping requirements for Class I ODS will
enable EPA to:

Ensure compliance with the restrictions on production, import, and
export of ozone-depleting substances;

Allow exempted production and import for certain uses and the consequent
tracking of that production and import;

Address industry and Federal concerns regarding the illegal import of
mislabeled used controlled substances;

Satisfy the United States’ obligations to report data under Article 7
of  the Protocol;

Fulfill statutory obligations under Section 603(b) of the CAA for
reporting and monitoring; and

Provide information to report to the U.S. Congress on the production,
use, and consumption of Class I controlled substances as statutorily
required in Section 603(d) of Title VI of the CAA.

EPA stores and analyzes the reported information to ensure companies do
not exceed their allowances.  In this regard, the information in the
reports is used for compliance monitoring for individual companies and
for monitoring U.S. compliance with its obligations under the Protocol.

Information that is collected on the production, import, and export of
controlled Class I substances is also used to develop the reports
provided to the Ozone Secretariat to meet U.S. international treaty
obligations.  Requirements to report the data annually are listed in
Article 7 of the Protocol.

Industry representatives and many Federal agencies, including EPA, are
concerned about claims of fraudulent imports of controlled substances
that are mislabeled as used, recycled, or reclaimed.  To this end, EPA
has established a petition process to provide information for
controlling the import of these materials and act as a deterrent to
potential fraud.  Under 40 CFR 82.13(g)(2), companies that want to
import used, recycled, or reclaimed controlled substances must provided
detailed information in the form of a petition about the previous use
and the future intended use of the substance.

3. Non duplication, Consultation, and Other Collection Criteria

(a) 	Non duplication

All of the information requested from respondents under this ICR is
required by statute (CAA §603(b)) and is not available from other
information sources because it is proprietary information submitted by
industry sources.

(b)	Public Notice Required Prior to ICR submission to OMB

An request for public comment for the renewal of this ICR was published
in the Federal Register on May 29, 2008 (73 FR 30917). EPA received one
comment generally opposed to the use of ozone depleting substances but
without direct relevance to the burden imposed by the renewed
information collection request. This second request is being submitted
to the Federal Register concurrent with submission of this ICR to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

(c)	Consultations

Recordkeeping and reporting requirements were established in the
original publication of the CFC phaseout rule.  This ICR (number
1432.29) does not add any additional recordkeeping or reporting
requirements.  To assess the current burden, EPA consulted informally
with regulated entities and analyzed historical data.

(d) 	Effects of Less Frequent Collection

Less frequent collection of data would compromise EPA’s ability to
meet statutory requirements under Section 603 of the CAA to monitor
production, import, and export levels.  Further, less frequent
collection of information would hinder EPA’s ability to identify
regulation violations.  Penalties for violations are currently assessed
at $32,500 per kilogram per day, and therefore, frequent information
collection is vital to pursue and enforce violations.

Less frequent collection of data would also potentially place the United
States in a non-compliance status under the Protocol.  Quarterly
reporting provides EPA with the necessary time to take action if an
individual reporting person or the United States as a whole were to
begin to exceed the Protocol’s production, import, or export limits or
the limits established in Section 604 of the CAA.  Additionally, if the
United States were to exceed the limits established in the Protocol it
would undermine its ability to effectively negotiate favorable positions
in the international forum.

(e)	General Guidelines

	This rule does not exceed any of the OMB guidelines found at 5 CFR
1320.5(d)(2).

(f)	Confidentiality

EPA informs the respondents that they may assert claims of business
confidentiality for any of the information they submit.  Information
claimed as confidential will be treated in accordance with the
procedures for handling information claimed as confidential under 40 CFR
part 2, subpart B (“Confidentiality of Business Information”), and
will be disclosed only if EPA determines that the information is not
entitled to confidential treatment.  If no claim of confidentiality is
asserted when the information is received by EPA, it may be made
available to the public without further notice to the respondents (40
CFR 2.203).

(g) 	Sensitive Questions

This section is not applicable because this ICR does not involve matters
of sensitive nature.

4.	The Respondents and the Information Request

(a)	Respondents/SIC Codes

The appropriate North American Industry Classification System (NAICS)
for potentially affected entities are listed below in Table I.

Table I. NAICS Classification of Regulated Entities

Category	NAICS Code

Chemical Producers, Importers, and Exporters (CFCs) 	3251- Basic
Chemical Manufacturing

Research and Development (Laboratories)	541710- Research and Development
in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

MeBr Producers, Importers, Exporters, Distributors, and Applicators
325320- Pesticide and Other Agricultural Chemical Manufacturing

(b)	Information Requested

(i) 	Data items, including recordkeeping requirements

Recordkeeping and reporting requirements changed substantially after the
phaseout of Class I controlled substances on January 1, 1996 (except
methyl bromide which was phased-out in 2005).  Prior to the phaseout of
Class I controlled substances, EPA administered a system of production
and consumption allowances and monitored compliance through quarterly
reports.  These types of allowances no longer exist due to the phaseout
of Class I controlled substances.

For the exempted production and import of Class I controlled substances,
EPA issues other allowances (e.g., essential uses, quarantine and
preshipment uses, Article 5 production) and requires reporting and
recordkeeping.  All producers, importers, exporters, distributors,
applicators, and others identified in 40 CFR 82.13 must record and/or
report the following either on a quarterly or annual basis as applicable
(note, a comprehensive listing of recordkeeping and requirements is
listed in 40 CFR 82.13):

I.   SEQ CHAPTER \h \r 1 Producers:

production of each controlled substance, including the quantity produced
for uses resulting in its transformation and/or destruction by the
producer;

production of each controlled substance under the exemptions for export
to Article 5 countries, essential uses, critical uses, and QPS uses;

the amount of controlled substance sold or transferred during the
quarter to a person other than the producer for use in processes
resulting in its transformation or eventual destruction;

for controlled substances provided to another entity for transformation,
a copy of an IRS certification or intent to transform the same
controlled substance for a particular transformer and a list of
additional quantities shipped to that same transformer for the quarter;

for controlled substances provided to another entity for destruction, a
copy of a destruction verification from that entity and a list of
quantities shipped to that entity for the quarter;

a list of U.S. purchasers of controlled substances that exported to an
Article 5 country in cases when Article 5 allowances were expended
during production;

a list of the essential-use allowance holders, distributors of
laboratory supplies and laboratory customers from whom orders were
placed and the quantity of specific essential-use controlled substances
requested and produced;

certifications from essential use allowance holders stating that the
controlled substances were purchased solely for specified essential uses
and will not be resold or used in any other manufacturing process;

in the case of laboratory essential uses, certification from
distributors of laboratory supplies that controlled substances were
purchased for sale to laboratory customers who certify that the
substances will only be used for essential laboratory and analytical
uses, and will not be resold or used in manufacturing; or, if sales are
made directly to laboratories that the controlled substances will only
be used for essential laboratory and analytical uses and will not be
resold or used in manufacturing;

written certification that quantities of critical use methyl bromide
were purchased by distributors, applicators, or approved critical users
to be used or sold only for critical uses;

for critical use methyl bromide, dated records such as invoices and
order forms, and a log of the quantity of controlled substances produced
solely for export to satisfy critical uses;

the amount of methyl bromide sold or transferred during the quarter to a
person other than the producer solely for QPS applications;

for methyl bromide produced for QPS uses, one copy of a certification
that the material will be used only for QPS applications from each
recipient of the material and a list of additional quantities shipped to
that same person for the quarter;

quantities of methyl bromide exported by the producer and/or other U.S.
companies in that control period, solely to satisfy the critical uses
authorized by the Parties for that control period.

	II. Importers:

the quantity of each controlled substance imported, either alone or in
mixtures, including the percentage of each mixture that consists of a
controlled substance;

the quantity of each controlled substance imported that is used
(including recycled or reclaimed) and the information provided in the
petition required to import used quantities of Class I controlled
substances;

the quantities of each controlled substance other than transhipments or
used, recycled or reclaimed substances imported for use in their
transformation or destruction, and the quantity sold for use in
processes that result in their destruction or transformation;

the quantities of controlled substances imported for approved essential
or critical uses;

the amount of controlled substances sold or transferred during the
quarter to each person for use in processes resulting in their
transformation or eventual destruction;

for each quantity of a controlled substance imported: the date on which
the controlled substance was imported; the port through which it passed;
the country from which it was imported; the commodity code for the
shipment; the importer number for the shipment; a copy of the bill of
lading for the import; the invoice for the import; and the U.S. Customs
entry form;

dated records documenting the sale or transfer of the controlled
substance for use in processes resulting in transformation or
destruction;

copies of IRS certifications that the controlled substance will be
transformed or destruction verifications that it will be destroyed;

dated records of the quantity of controlled substances being purchased
for essential and laboratory uses or for eventual sale to laboratories
that certify that controlled substances are for essential laboratory and
analytical uses;

the amount of controlled substances sold or transferred during the
quarter to each person for an essential use;

certifications from essential-use allowance holders stating that the
controlled substances were purchased solely for specified essential uses
and will not be resold or used in manufacturing; and the certifications
from distributors of laboratory supplies that the controlled substances
were purchased solely for eventual sale to  laboratories that certify
the controlled substances are for essential laboratory and analytical
uses, or if sales are made directly to laboratories, verifications from
laboratories that the controlled substances will only be used for
essential laboratory and analytical uses and will not be resold or used
in manufacturing;

in the case of laboratory essential uses, a certification from
distributors of laboratory supplies that controlled substances were
purchased for sale to laboratory customers who certify that the
substances will only be used for laboratory applications and will not be
resold or uses in  manufacturing;

for methyl bromide, dated records of the quantity of controlled
substances imported for QPS applications and quantity sold for
quarantine and preshipment applications;

written certifications that quantities of methyl bromide imported solely
for QPS applications were purchased by distributors or applicators to be
used only for quarantine and preshipment applications;

written verifications from a U.S. purchaser that methyl bromide imported
solely for QPS applications upon receipt of a certification;

a list of the quantities of methyl bromide exported by the importer and
or by other U.S. companies, to a Party to the Protocol that will be used
solely for QPS applications;

in the case of importing a container with a heel, the amount brought
into the United States with a certification that the residual amount in
each shipment is less than 10 percent of the volume of the container and
the fate of the container; a report indicating the final disposition of
each shipment must also be submitted;

in the case of importing a used substance, a copy of the petition
submitted, the EPA non-objection notice, and the bill of lading for the
import;

	III. Exporters:

names and addresses of the exporter and the recipient of the exports;

the exporter’s Employer Identification Number;

for each export: the type and quantity of each controlled substance
exported and what percentage, if any, of the controlled substance is
used, recycled or reclaimed; the date on which, and the port from which,
the controlled substances were exported to the United States or its
territories; the country to which the controlled substances were
exported; the amount exported to each Article 5 country, and the
commodity code of the controlled substance shipped;

the invoice or sales agreement containing language similar to the
Internal Revenue Service Certificate that the purchaser or recipient of
imported controlled substances, or destruction verifications that the
purchaser or recipient intends to destroy the controlled substances, or
the certification that the purchaser or recipient and the eventual
applicator will only us the material for QPS applications;

in cases of export to Article 5 countries (in addition to applicable
exporting requirements listed above):

the names and telephone number of contact persons for the exporter and
for the recipient;

a copy of the bill of lading and invoice indicating the net quantity
shipped and documenting the sale of the controlled substances to the
Article 5 purchaser;

a copy of the invoice or sales agreement covering the sale of the
controlled substances to the recipient Article 5 country that contains
provisions forbidding the re-export of the controlled substance in bulk
form and subjecting the recipient or any transferee of the recipient to
liquidated damages equal to the resale price of the controlled
substances if they are re-exported in bulk form.

	IV. Persons that destroy Class I controlled substances:

a one time report stating the destruction unit’s efficiency and the
methods used to record the volume destroyed and those used to determine
destruction efficiency and the name of other relevant federal or state
regulations that may apply to the destruction process.

	V. Persons that purchase/receive and subsequently destroy Class I
substances that 	were originally produced without expending allowances:

a destruction verification (to the producer or importer) containing the
following:

the identity and address of the person intending to destroy controlled
substances;

indications of whether those controlled substances will be completely
destroyed, or less than completely destroyed, in which case the
destruction efficiency at which such substances will be destroyed must
be included;

period of time over which the person intends to destroy controlled
substances;

signature of the verifying person;

the name and quantities of Class I controlled substances that were
destroyed at the end of the control period.

VI. Persons that transform Class I controlled substances:

the name and quantities of Class I controlled substances transformed at
the end of the control period;

in cases where Class I controlled substances are purchased for
transformation, the person who transforms the substances is to provide
the producer or importer with an IRS certification that the controlled
substances are to be used in processes resulting in their
transformation.

VII. Persons that tranship Class I substances:

records that indicate that the shipment originated in a foreign country
destined for another foreign country, and does not enter interstate
commerce with the United States.

	VIII. Persons allocated essential-use allowances:

quantities of each controlled substance received from each producer
and/or each importer during that quarter and the country from which the
controlled substance was imported;

gross quantities of each controlled substance that was used for the
essential use;

quantities contained in exported products;

quantity of each controlled substance that was destroyed or recycled;

quantity held in inventory as of the last day of the control period,
that was acquired with essential use allowances in all control periods;

the quantity of each controlled substance in a stockpile that is owned
by the company or is being held on behalf of the company under contract,
and was produced or imported through the use of production allowances
and consumption allowances;

for essential use allowances for metered-dose inhalers (MDI) only, the
allowance holder must report the total number of marketable units of
each specific MDI product manufactured in the control period.

	IX. Distributors of laboratory supplies receiving controlled substances
under the 	global laboratory essential use exemption:

quantities received of each controlled substance from each producer or
importer;

quantities of each controlled substance purchased by each laboratory
customer whose certification was previously provided to the distributor;

in cases where the distributor sells the Class I controlled substances
as reference standards for calibrating equipment, the distributor must
submit the quantity of each controlled substance purchased by each
laboratory customer whose certification was previously provided to the
distributor.

X. Persons that distribute quarantine and preshipment methyl bromide:

certifications provided to the producer or importer that quantities
received that were produced or imported solely for QPS applications
under the exemptions will be used only for quarantine applications or
preshipment applications;

certifications from applicators, prior to delivery of the quantity, that
the quantity of methyl bromide ordered will be used solely for QPS
applications;

the total quantity delivered to applicators in which certifications were
received that state the methyl bromide would be use solely for QPS
applications.

XI. Persons that apply quarantine and preshipment methyl bromide:

a document from the commodity owner, shipper or their agent requesting
the use of methyl bromide citing the regulatory requirement that
justifies its use;

a copy of the certification (provided to the distributor before a
shipment) that the quantity of controlled substances will be used only
for QPS applications.

XII. QPS commodity owner, shipper, or their agent:

records for each request, certifying knowledge of the requirements
associated with the exemption for QPS applications; the record must
include the certifying language listed in the regulation.

XIII. Trades with another Party to the Protocol:

for trades from a Party, a document, from the principal diplomatic
representative in that nation’s embassy in the United States,
containing:

the identity and address of the person;

the identity of the Party;

the names and telephone number of contact persons for the person and for
the Party;

the chemical type, type of allowance being transferred, and the level of
allowances being transferred;

the control period(s) to which the transfer applies;

for increased production indented for export to the Party from whom the
allowances would be received, a signed statement of intent to export to
the Party;

in the case of transferring essential-use allowances, the transferor
must include a signed document from the transferee identifying the CFC
MDI products that will be produced using the essential-use allowances;

for trades to a Party, a transfer request that sets forth the following:

the identity and address of the person;

the names and telephone numbers of contact persons for the person and
for the Party;

the chemical type, type of allowances being transferred, and the level
of allowances being transferred; and

the control period(s) to which the transfer applies.

XIV. Transfers of allowances for Class I controlled substances:

a transfer claim setting forth the following:

the identities and addresses of the transferor and transferee;

the name and telephone numbers of contact persons for the transferor and
the transferee;

the type of allowances being transferred, including the names of the
controlled substances for which allowances are to be transferred;

the group of controlled substances to which the allowance being
transferred pertains;

the amount of allowances being transferred;

the control period(s) for which the allowances are being transferred;

the amount of unexpected allowances of the type and for the control
period being transferred that the transferor holds as of the date the
claim is submitted to EPA;

the amount of the one percent offset applied to the unweighted amount
trade that will be deducted from the transferor’s production or
consumption allowances balance; in the case of transferring essential
use allowances, the amount of one tenth of one percent of the amount
traded will be deducted from the transferor’s allowance balance;

in cases of transfers of essential-use CFCs:

the specific MDI products that the transferee plans to produce with the
transferred CFCs;

the country(ies) where the CFC MDI produced with the transferred
essential-use CFCs will be sold if other than in the United States;

certification that the essential-use CFCs will be used in the production
of essential MDIs; if the MDIs are to be sold in the United States, the
certification must state that MDIs produced with the transferred
essential-use CFCs are listed as essential and were approved by the Food
and Drug Administration before December 31, 2000; if the MDIs produced
with the essential-use CFCs are to be sold outside the United States,
the transferee must verify that the MDIs produced with the essential-use
CFCs are considered essential by the importing country;

a letter from the transferor stating that it concurs with the terms of
the transfer as requested by the transferee;

in cases where the trade is international:

a signed document from the principal diplomatic representative in the
Party’s embassy in the United States stating that the appropriate
authority within the nation has approved the transfer of the
essential-use CFCs.

XV. Interpollutant conversions (Article 5 allowances):

a conversion claim with the following:

the identity and address of the converter;

the name and telephone number of a contact person for the converter;

the type of allowances or credits being converted, including the names
of the controlled substances for which allowances or credits are to be
converted;

the group of controlled substances to which the allowances or credits
being converted pertains;

the amount and type of allowances or credits to be converted;

the amount of allowances or allowances or credits to be subtracted from
the converter’s unexpended allowances or credits for the first
controlled substance, to be equal to 101 percent of the amount of
allowances or credits converted;

the amount of allowance or credits to be added to the converter’s
unexpended allowances or credits for the second controlled substance, to
be equal to the amount of allowances or credits for the first controlled
substance being converted multiplied by the quotient of the ozone
depletion factor of the first controlled substance divided by the ozone
depletion factor of the second controlled substance;

the control period(s) for which the allowances or credits are being
converted;

the amount of unexpended allowances or credits or the type and for the
control period being converted that the converter holds as of the date
the claim is submitted to EPA.

XVI. Persons wanting to import used Class I controlled substance

a petition containing:

name and quantity in kilograms of the used controlled substance to be
imported;

name and address of the importer, the importer ID number, the contact
person, and the phone number;

name, address, contact person, phone number and fax number of all
previous source facilities from which the used controlled substance was
recovered;

a detailed description of the previous use of the controlled substance
at each source facility and a best estimate of when the specific
controlled substance was put into the equipment at each source facility,
and, when possible documents indicating the date the material was put
into the equipment;

a list of the name, make and model number of the equipment from which
the material was recovered at each source facility;

name, address, contact person, phone number and fax number of the
exporter and of all persons to whom the material was transferred or sold
after it was recovered from the source facility;

the U.S. port of entry for the import, the expected date of shipment and
the vessel transporting the chemical; if at the time of submitting a
petition the importer does not know the U.S. port of entry, the expected
date of shipment and the vessel transporting the chemical, and the
importer receives a non-objection notice for the individual shipment in
the petition, the importer is required to notify the Administrator of
this information prior to the actual U.S. Customs entry of the
individual shipment;

a description of the intended of the used controlled substance, and,
when, possible, the name, address, contact person, phone number and fax
number of the ultimate purchaser in the United States;

name, address, contact person, phone number and fax number of the U.S.
reclamation facility, where applicable; if someone at the source
facility recovered the controlled substance from the equipment, the name
and phone and fax numbers of that person;

if the imported controlled substance was reclaimed in a foreign Party,
the name, address, contact person and fax number of any or all foreign
reclamation facility(ies) responsible for reclaiming the cited shipment;

an export license from the appropriate government agency in the country
of export and, if recovered in another country, the export license from
the appropriate government agency in that country;

if the imported used controlled substance is intended to be sold as a
refrigerant in the U.S., the name and address of the U.S. reclaimer who
will bring the material to the standard required under Section 608 of
the CAA, if not already reclaimed to those specifications;

a certification of accuracy of the information submitted in the
petition.

In addition, all entities may be required to provide other such
information that the Administrator may reasonably require to comply with
requests from the Ozone Secretariat seeking information required by
decisions taken by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol.  All records
and reports must comply with requirements for Class I controlled
substances in Subpart A of the regulations.  Reports and records
associated with the reports listed above must be kept for three years.
All amounts must be reported in kilograms.  These recordkeeping
requirements pertain to original documents that are held by companies in
the normal course of conducting business such as Customs entry forms,
accounts of daily production runs, sales invoices, and bills of lading.
Information from these recordkeeping documents is summarized in reports.
 Recordkeeping requirements are designed to aid EPA in compliance
monitoring, site inspection, and enforcement actions.

(ii) 	Respondent Activities

Persons that produce, import, export, distribute, supply, transform,
destroy, and apply controlled Class I ODS are to maintain records and
report to EPA or persons involved in transactions on a quarterly,
annual, or transactional basis as mandated by applicable sections of the
regulations.  All records and reports must comply with applicable
requirements specified in: §82.9 (“Availability of production
allowances in addition to baseline production allowances for Class I
controlled substances”), §82.11 (“Exports of Class I controlled
substances to Article 5 Parties”), §82.12 (“Transfers of allowances
for Class I controlled substances”), §82.13 (“Recordkeeping and
reporting requirements for Class I controlled substances.”).  These
records and copies of reports are to be maintained for three years.

5. The Information Collected - Agency Activities, Collection
Methodology, and Information Management

(a) Agency Activities

Enter, maintain, and manage information submitted from companies in the
ODS Tracking System;

Respond to companies submitting tracking/monitored information, such as
Article 5 allowances and essential use allowances to confirm
transactions and provide allowance balances;

Review and respond to petitions submitted to import used Class I
controlled substances;

Review information and conduct compliance monitoring activities related
to restrictions on production, import, export, transformation, and
destruction of Class I controlled substances for individual companies by
comparing data with other sources of information;

Inspect records maintained by producers, importers, exporters,
transformers, and destroyers of ODS;

Review information in the Tracking System to ensure that the United
States is not exceeding its obligations under the Montreal Protocol
which limits production and consumption of controlled ODS;

Review information in the Tracking System to ensure exempted production
and imports do not exceed limits statutorily set in Section 604 of the
CAA;

Compile reports mandated by United States obligations under the Montreal
Protocol and the CAA, including reports to Congress and the Ozone
Secretariat.

(b)	Collection Methods

	EPA provides reporting forms for regulated participants to use to
report the required information.  Reporting forms for Class I controlled
substances, as well as guidance on completing the forms, are available
on EPA’s website at   HYPERLINK
"http://epa.gov/ozone/record/classone.html"
http://epa.gov/ozone/record/classone.html .  Reporting forms can be sent
to EPA in hard copy form or submitted electronically.

The use of the reporting forms is voluntary, but they are generally used
by every participant in the regulatory program.  The forms facilitate
and streamline the submission of required data for respondents.  The
reporting requirements, first promulgated in the July 30, 1992, final
rule, and then simplified and reduced through amendments published in
the Federal Register on May 10, 1995, reduced the administrative and
reporting burden.

In general, the regulatory program and the reporting requirements are
smaller after the phaseout.  As of January 1, 1996 (the post-phaseout
period), the system of production and consumption allowances was no
longer used, simplifying overall tracking and monitoring.  New reporting
and recordkeeping requirements exist, however, for the exempt uses of
Class I substances.  The reporting procedures for the post-phaseout
period were selected for their administrative feasibility and minimal
reporting burden.

(c)	Small Entity Flexibility

	Much of this information collection is required by statute.  Additional
information collection is undertaken to support the United States’
reporting obligations under the Protocol. The information collection is
required to 1) ensure allowance holders have access to their allowances,
2) develop these nationally and internationally mandated reports, and 3)
maintain compliance with Sections 604 and 606 of the CAA.

	The burden on all affected entities, and especially the burden on small
entities, has been reduced to every extent possible.  Laboratories, the
only small entities required to submit information, are required to
certify purchases of exempted Class I controlled substances once per
year, indicating that they will only be used for laboratory or
analytical purposes and not be resold, and identifying the specific use
to which the substances will be put.  This requirement is to ensure
proper use of exempted production and import and to allow the United
Sates to report specific information to the Secretariat to the Protocol
regarding the use of ODS for laboratory purposes as required under Annex
II of Decision VI/9.  All other respondents to the program are large
companies.

(d)	Collection Schedule

After the phaseout on January 1, 1996:

Producers, importers, holders of essential use allowances, laboratory
suppliers, and distributors of QPS methyl bromide must report to EPA
quarterly (45 days after the end of each quarter);

Exporters, and persons that destroy and transform Class I controlled
substances, are to report to EPA annually (45 days after the end of the
control period);

Persons wanting to trade with another Party to the Protocol, undertake
interpollutant conversions, transfer allowances, import used Class I
controlled substances (i.e. petition) are to submit reports to EPA on a
transactional basis.

All entities may be required to provide other such information that the
Administrator may reasonably require to comply with ad hoc requests from
the Ozone Secretariat seeking information required by decisions taken by
the Parties to the Montreal Protocol subsequent to the publication of
this ICR.  The Agency anticipates this, on average, to occur no more
than annually per prospective respondent.

6. 	Estimating the Burden and Cost of Collection

(a) 	Estimating Respondent Burden

	 The basis of the analysis is the identification of the principal steps
involved in complying with EPA recordkeeping and reporting requirements
and the estimated burden associated with each step.  EPA identified 18
reporting activities which contain all information mandated by EPA’s
regulations (see Table II. Respondent Burden for details).  EPA
estimated the number of respondents per reporting activity based on the
quantity of respondents that submitted reports over the last several
years.  The number of reports submitted per year is either four
(quarterly), one (annually), or other (per transaction).  EPA estimated
the amount of time for data compilation and report preparation by
analyzing historical information.  The last three collection activities
are not submitted to EPA, rather they are provided to another entity,
such as a producer or importer, as mandated.  This ICR (1432.29) does
not add any additional recordkeeping and reporting requirements from the
previous ICR.

Table II. Respondent Burden

	A	B	C	D	E	F	G

Collection Activity: Recordkeeping and Reporting	 Number of Respondents
Responses per respondent per control period	Total Responses   (AxB)	Data
Compilation (hours)	Report Preparation (hours)	Hours per Response (D+E)
Total Hours per year  (CxF)

Producer's Report	8	4	32	4	0.5	4.5	144

Producer's Report (MeBr)	2	4	8	4	0.5	4.5	36

Importer's Report	6	4	24	4	0.5	4.5	108

Importer's Report (MeBr)	2	4	8	4	0.5	4.5	36

Exporter's Report	10	1	10	4	0.5	4.5	45

Exporter's Report (MeBr)	2	4	8	4	0.5	4.5	36

Destruction and Transformation	4	2	8	4	0.5	4.5	36

Essential Use Allowance Holders	8	4	32	4	0.5	4.5	144

Laboratory Supply/Distribution	4	4	16	4	0.5	4.5	72

Transfers of substances

(int'l and domestic)	4	5	20	4	0.5	4.5	90

Transfers of allowances

(int'l and domestic)	4	3	12	4	0.5	4.5	54

QPS MeBr Distributor Report	15	4	60	4	0.5	4.5	270

Interpollutant Conversions 	1	2	2	4	0.5	4.5	9

Petitions for used imports	2	10	20	4	0.5	4.5	90

Other information requested by Ozone Secretariat	20	1	20	2	0.5	2.5	50

SUBTOTAL FOR REPORTING TO EPA ONLY	92	56	280	58	7.5	65.5	1220

QPS MeBr Applicator Certification	15	6	90	0.5	0.5	1	90

Commodity Owner, Shipper or Agent Recordkeeping (MeBr)	50	10	500	0.5	0.5
1	500

Lab Certification	1,000	1	1000	0.5	0.5	1	1000

SUBTOTAL FOR CERTIFICATIONS	1,065	17	1,590	2	2	3	1,590

TOTAL RESPONDENTS & HOURS 	1,157	 	1,870	 	 	 	2,810

(b) Estimating Respondent Costs

(i). Estimating Labor Costs

To determine the labor costs associated with recordkeeping and
reporting, EPA used an hourly industry wage rate of $44.68.  This is the
average hourly wage rate for professional and related persons derived
from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Employer Cost and Employee
Compensation Table 2 (“Civilian workers, by occupational and industry
group”), December 2007.  EPA added 110 percent to the hourly industry
wage rate to reflect additional costs for overhead and fringe,
increasing the wage rate to $93.83 per hour.  The total burden hours per
year was estimated to be 2,810 hours, which when multiplied by the
hourly industry wage rate of $93.83 equals $263,662 for total yearly
costs.  To determine yearly costs per respondent, per report, EPA
multiplied the burden hours per respondent per report by the average
industry wage ($93.83). See Table III below for details.

Table III.  Yearly Respondent Costs Calculations

Industry Wage (includes overhead and fringe)	Total Burden Hours	Total
Yearly Costs

$93.83 	2,810	$263,662

Industry Wage (includes overhead and fringe)	Total Burden Hours per
Respondent	Total Yearly Costs per Respondent

$93.83 	2.4	$228

(ii). Estimating Capital and Operations and Management Costs

Operation and maintenance costs include expenses such as photocopying,
packaging, and postage.  Although variations may occur based on the
quantity of the data submitted to EPA as well as the method in which the
respondent submits the data (i.e. regular post or express mail), $3.00
was estimated to be the cost per respondent per report.  To determine
the total capital and operations and management costs, 1,860 (total
responses) was multiplied by $3.00 and equaled $5,580.

(iii). Capital and Start-up Costs

Capital and start-up costs were estimated to be $0 because new
recordkeeping or reporting requirements have not been added to this ICR.
 Persons that are required to maintain records and report information
have participated in the program for several years.

(iv). Annualizing Capital Costs

Capital/start-up costs were estimated to be $0.

(c)	Estimating Agency Burden and Costs

To determine agency and burden costs, EPA identified three main
activities associated with recordkeeping and reporting: receiving and
entering data submitted, reviewing data entries, and preparing and
reviewing company data balance statements.  EPA then estimated hours per
activity, per report received, per Agency staff member.  EPA also
developed estimates for maintaining the Tracking System and processing
reports for the control period.  See Table IV below for details.

	The hourly wage rates for EPA technical and managerial staff were
derived from the 2008 OPM annual base pay table divided by 2,080 to
estimate the hourly wage and then multiplied by 1.6, the standard
government benefits multiplier.  The hourly wage rates are as follows:
EPA estimates an average hourly labor cost of $73.38 (GS-15 level) for
managerial costs and $52.79 (GS-13 level) for technical staff.  Each
hour of extramural (contractor) time is valued at $85.00 per hour
including overhead and fringe.  The total was estimated to be $106,057
per year.

Table IV. Agency Burden and Cost

Agency Activity	Number of Reports/ Year	Managerial Hours 	Technical
Hours 	Extramural Hours 	Total Costs (Number of Reports x Labor Costs)

 	 	$73.38 	$52.79 	$85.00

1. Receiving and entering data;	280	0	2	0	$29,562

	$105.58

2. Reviewing data entries;	280	0.5	1	0	$25,054

$36.69 	$52.79

($10,273+$14,781)

3. Preparing and reviewing company data balance statements;	280	0.5	1	0
$25,054

$36.69 	$52.79

($10,273+$14,781)

4. Maintaining ODS tracking system and reports	NA	20	150	200

(20*$73.38)	(150*$52.79)	(200*$85)

	$1,467.60 	$7,918.50 	$17,000.00 	$26,386.10

Total Annual Burden Hours	 	 	 	 	1,352

Grand Total Per Year =	$106,057

(d)	Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs

	The values for respondent universe and total burden and costs are based
on estimates of the number of respondents and hours to compile data and
prepare reports.  Historical data from reports submitted over the last
several years and informal consultations with stakeholders were used to
develop estimates.  Costs associated with compliance for EPA and
respondents are averages and were estimated from publicly available data
sources.  The total burden hours for respondents decreased in this ICR
because it refines the hourly burden estimates for certifying the
Quarantine and Preshipment use of methyl bromide and laboratory use of
all ozone depleting substances.  Increases in the average hourly wage
rate for industry caused by normal inflation also contributed to higher
respondent costs.  Additionally, estimates were refined based on
historical information.  The total also reflects Agency practice of
periodically seeking necessary information from the regulated community
through the use of its authority under Section 114 of the Clean Air Act.
No new recordkeeping and reporting requirements were added.

(e) 	Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables

	(i)  Respondent Tally

To determine bottom line burden hours and costs for respondents, EPA
estimated the total number of responses per control period.  The total
number of responses for all respondents was calculated to be 2,810
hours.  Therefore, over the three year span of this ICR, the total hours
estimated for compliance for respondents is estimated to be 8,430 hours
(2,810 x 3 years).

(ii) The Agency Tally

	EPA estimated the amount of time required to complete each of the three
main activities associated with the reports.  In addition, hours and
costs for maintaining the Tracking System and reporting forms were
determined.  Therefore, over the three year span of this ICR, the total
Agency cost is estimated to be $318,172 ($106,057 x 3 years).

(f)	Reasons for Change in Burden

Overall, respondent burden and cost for this ICR were lower than those
estimates in the previous ICR due to the decrease in the overall burden
for compliance, specifically the hours needed to certify laboratory and
QPS uses of ozone depleting substances.  In addition, costs and burdens
changed because estimates were refined.  Agency burden increased due to
increases in the average hourly wage rate caused by normal inflation.

Table V.  Burden Summary

 	1432.25	1432.29

	(Original ICR)	(ICR Renewal)

Respondents: Annual burden hours	8,370	2,810

Respondents: Annual labor costs	$708,520 	$263,662

Respondents: Annual capital/start-up costs	$0 	$0

Respondents: O&M costs	$5,580 	$5,580

Agency: Annual burden hours	1,350	1,352

Agency: Annual labor costs	$92,413 	$106,057

(g) 	Burden Statement

	The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this
collection of information is estimated to average 2 hours per response.
Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by
persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency.  This includes the time needed
to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize
technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and
verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and
disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply
with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.  An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.  The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are
listed in 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

	To comment on the Agency’s need for this information, the accuracy of
the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing
respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques,
EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0264, which is available for public viewing at the Air
and Radiation Docket and Information Center in the EPA Docket Center
(EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington,
DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays.  The
telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the
telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket and Information Center
is<PHONE_NUMBER>.  An electronic version of the public docket is
available at www.regulations.gov.  This site can be used to submit or
view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that
are available electronically.  When in the system, select “search,”
then key in the Docket ID Number identified above.  Also, you can send
comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503,
Attention: Desk Office for EPA.  Please include the EPA Docket ID No.
EPA-HQ-OAR-2008-0264 and OMB control number 2060-0170 in any
correspondence.

PART B OF THE SUPPORTING STATEMENT

	EPA did not develop Part B of the supporting statement because this ICR
did not involve statistical sampling.

 NAICS codes were retrieved from the “2002 NAICS Codes and Titles”
provided by the U.S. Census Bureau at,
http://www.census.gov/epcd/naics02/naicod02.htm.

 PAGE

 PAGE   1


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 122 (Friday, June 24, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 41280-41282]
[FR Doc No: 2016-14879]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

Docket No. FAA-2016-6967; Airspace Docket No. 16-AWP-7

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Santa Rosa, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Class E airspace designated as
an extension to a Class D airspace at Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County
Airport, Santa Rosa, CA, by reducing the segment extending northwest of
the airport and adding a segment southeast of the airport. This action
also proposes to modify Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface to include only that area required for Instrument
Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport. Additionally, this action
updates the airport's geographic coordinates for both Class D and E
airspace areas. A review of the airspace has made this proposal
necessary for the safety and management of Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures for IFR operations at the airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 8, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2016-
6967; Airspace Docket No. 16-AWP-7, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-
647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at the above address.
    FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
The Order is also available for inspection at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of
FAA Order 7400.9Z at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Clark, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would modify Class D and Class E airspace at Charles M. Schulz-
Sonoma County Airport, Santa Rosa, CA.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2016-6967/
Airspace Docket No. 16-AWP-7.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

Availability and Summary of Documents Proposed for Incorporation by
Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and effective
September 15, 2015. FAA Order 7400.9Z is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 to modify Class E airspace designated as
an extension at Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, Santa Rosa,
CA, by creating an area southeast of the airport to contain IFR
arrivals below 1,000 feet above the surface, and by reducing in size
the Class E surface area extension northwest of the airport to only
that necessary to contain IFR arrivals below 1,000 feet above the
surface. Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface would be modified to include only that area necessary to
contain IFR arrivals below 1,500 feet above the surface and IFR
departures until reaching 1,200 feet above the surface. The proposal
would also update the airport's geographic coordinates for all Class D
and E airspace areas. The proposed modifications are necessary for the
safety and management of IFR operations at the airport.
    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
paragraph 5000, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
dated August 6, 2015 and effective September 15, 2015, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class D and Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a

routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated, would not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and
effective September 15, 2015, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000 Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

AWP CA D Santa Rosa, CA

Santa Rosa, Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, CA
    (Lat. 38[deg]30'35'' N., long. 122[deg]48'46'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface up to and
including 2,600 feet MSL within a 4.3-mile radius of Santa Rosa/
Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport. This Class D airspace area
is effective during the specific dates and times established in
advance by a Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the Chart Supplement.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

AWP CA E4 Santa Rosa, CA

Santa Rosa, Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, CA
    (Lat. 38[deg]30'35'' N., long. 122[deg]48'46'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within 1.8 miles
east and 2.8 miles west of the 342[deg] bearing from the Charles M.
Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, CA, extending from the 4.3 mile radius
of the airport to 7.4 miles northwest of the airport, and that
airspace extending upward from the surface within 1.2 miles each
side of the 156[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 4.3
mile radius to 6.3 miles southeast of the airport.

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AWP CA E5 Santa Rosa, CA

Santa Rosa, Charles M. Schulz-Sonoma County Airport, CA
    (Lat. 38[deg]30'35'' N., long. 122[deg]48'46'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 38[deg]42'14'' N., long.
122[deg]46'18'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]38'58'' N., long. 122[deg]59'10''
W.; to lat. 38[deg]21'20'' N., long. 122[deg]58'26'' W.; to lat.
38[deg]19'23'' N., long. 122[deg]54'00'' W.; to lat. 38[deg]24'00''
N., long. 122[deg]39'26'' W.; thence to the point of origin.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on June 16, 2016.
Brian J. Johnson
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2016-14879 Filed 6-23-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21932-21934]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9432]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64299; File No. SR-NYSE-2011-14]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Alter Listing Fees Applicable to Debt Securities and Structured
Products

April 14, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on April 11, 2011, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Section 902.08 of the Listed Company
Manual (the ``Manual'') to alter its listing fees applicable to debt
securities and

structured products. The text of the proposed rule change is available
at the Exchange's principle office, the Commission's Public Reference
Room, and http://www.nyse.com, and on the Commission's Web site at
http://www.sec.gov.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Section 902.08 of the Manual to
alter its listing fees applicable to debt securities and structured
products. This filing does not amend the listing fees applicable to
equity securities of operating companies.
    The Exchange currently applies the fee schedule set forth in
Section 902.08 to all securities (including short-term securities) that
list under the debt standard in Section 703.19 \3\ and trade on NYSE
Bonds (``Affected Products''). Under the current Rule, listed companies
and their affiliates pay a flat $15,000 for Affected Products and such
Affected Products are not assessed annual fees. Effective July 1, 2011
and thereafter, the Exchange proposes to amend Section 902.08 to (i)
reduce the initial listing fee for Affected Products from $15,000 to
$5,000 and (ii) impose an annual fee of $5,000 for Affected
Products.\4\ Issuers who have paid the initial listing fee of $15,000
prior to July 1, 2011 shall receive a waiver of the annual fees imposed
under the amended Rule until January 1, 2014 in order to provide a more
equitable allocation of fees among such issuers before and after the
fee change.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The general categories of securities that are currently
listed under Section 703.19 are: (1) Capital securities; (2) retail
debt securities; (3) mandatory convertible securities; and (4)
repackaged securities.
    \4\ For Affected Products listed on or after July 1, 2011, such
issuers will pay a pro-rated annual fee for 2011.
    \5\ The Exchange believes that the proposed fee structure and
three year waiver provides a fair allocation of fees and an
appropriate transition period for issuers. For example, an issuer
that paid the initial listing fee of $15,000 on January 1, 2011 will
not be assessed an annual fee of $5,000 until January 1, 2014. Thus,
as of that date, such issuer will have paid in total $20,000 for
listing the Affected Product on the Exchange (the initial listing
fee of $15,000 plus the $5,000 annual fee paid on January 1, 2014).
An issuer that lists an Affected Product on January 1, 2012 will pay
$10,000 in 2012 (a $5,000 initial listing fee and a $5,000 annual
fee), a $5,000 annual fee on January 1, 2013, and a $5,000 annual
fee on January 1, 2014. Thus, as of January 1, 2014, such issuer
also will have paid in total $20,000 for listing the Affected
Product on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the provisions of Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act''),\6\ in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\7\
in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among its members
and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Although the initial listing fee would decline, the Exchange
anticipates that the proposed addition of annual fees would increase
the overall fees it would collect from issuers of Affected Products
over time. The Exchange believes that moving from a one-time listing
fee to a lower initial listing fee coupled with ongoing annual fees
will help to better align the Exchange's revenues and costs over the
span of the listing. The proposed increases in total fees associated
with Affected Products would support the increased costs incurred by
the Exchange for the rulemaking process, ongoing listing administration
processes, issuer services, and consultative services provided to these
issuers. In addition, higher fees for Affected Products reflect the
greater resources the Exchange would expend to provide additional
services in connection with the listing and administration of these
securities and would align the cost of Affected Products with those
fees charged for other debt securities eligible to trade on the NYSE
bond platform, which also have an initial listing fee of $5,000 and
annual fee of $5,000. Moreover, the waiver of annual fees for issuers
that previously paid the higher $15,000 initial listing fee would more
equitably allocate overall fees among issuers of such securities and
provide a fair transition to the new fee structure.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \8\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\9\ because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the NYSE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2011-14 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2011-14. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will

post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSE-2011-14 and should be submitted on or before May
10, 2011

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-9432 Filed 4-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 25, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 3761]
[FR Doc No: 2012-1421]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice Announcing Filing Priority for Preliminary Permit
Applications

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Project
                                                                  No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
FFP Project 18, LLC.........................................   12857-002
Northland Power Mississippi River LLC.......................   14073-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On January 17, 2012, the Commission held a drawing to determine
priority among competing preliminary permit applications with identical
filing times. In the event that the Commission concludes that none of
the applicants' plans are better adapted than the others to develop,
conserve, and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the
region at issue, the priority established by this drawing will serve as
the tiebreaker. Based on the drawing, the order of priority is as
follows:
    1. FFP Project 18, LLC; Project No. 12857-002.
    2. Northland Power Mississippi River LLC ; Project No. 14073-000.

    Dated: January 18, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-1421 Filed 1-24-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 105 (Wednesday, June 1, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 35009]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12769]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER16-1752-000]

Americhoice Energy OH, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Americhoice Energy OH, LLC`s application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is June 13, 2016.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 23, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-12769 Filed 5-31-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P