[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 112 (Friday, June 10, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34124-34127]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14372]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) Approvals and
Disapprovals

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Monthly Notice of PFC Approvals and Disapprovals. In May 2011,
there were six applications approved. This notice also includes
information on three applications, approved in April 2011,
inadvertently

left off the April 2011 notice. Additionally, nine approved amendments
to previously approved applications are listed.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA publishes a monthly notice, as appropriate, of PFC
approvals and disapprovals under the provisions of the Aviation Safety
and Capacity Expansion Act of 1990 (Title IX of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990) (Pub. L. 101-508) and Part 158 of the
Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 158). This notice is
published pursuant to paragraph d of Sec.  158.29.

PFC Applications Approved

    Public Agency: County of San Joaquin, Stockton, California.
    Application Number: 11-05-C-00-SCK.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $336,996.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: September 1, 2011.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: September 1, 2012.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's: Nonscheduled/
on-demand air carriers filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Stockton Metropolitan Airport.
    Brief Description Of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Rehabilitation of taxiways H and J.
    Terminal hold room expansion.
    Aircraft rescue and firefighting building modification.
    Rehabilitate runway 11R/29L lighting system.
    Rehabilitate airfield markings.
    Modify runway 11R/29L distance-to-go signs.
    Reconstruct terminal ramp--design.
    Reconstruct terminal ramp--construction.
    Security equipment--fingerprinting machine (replacement).
    PFC Administrative costs.
    Brief Description of Project Partially Approved for Collection and
Use: Aircraft rescue and firefighting radio/crash phone system.
    Determination: The FAA determined that the proposed hand held radio
equipment is not PFC eligible in accordance with Sec.  158.15(b).
    Decision Date: April 20, 2011.
    For Further Information Contact: Gretchen Kelly, San Francisco
Airports District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 623.
    Public Agency: Jacksonville Airport Authority, Jacksonville,
Florida.
    Application Number: 11-10-C-00-JAX.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in this Decision: $11,352,575.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: October 1, 2023.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: July 1, 2024.
    Class Of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's: Air taxi/
commercial operators.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Jacksonville International Airport.
    Brief Description Of Projects Approved for Collection and Use at a
$4.50 PFC Level:
    Design concourse B apron.
    Construct concourse B apron (phase I)--bypass taxiways.
    Design and construct runways 13/31, 7/24, and air cargo apron joint
seal rehabilitation.
    Airfield lighting upgrades.
    Aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicle replacement.
    Electrical substation and distribution system rehabilitation.
    Rehabilitate internal circulation road (aircraft rescue and
firefighting access).
    Rehabilitate taxiways T and H.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use at a
$3.00 PFC Level:
    Schematic design of concourse B.
    Rehabilitate baggage information display screens.
    Rehabilitate internal circulation road (tug road improvements).
    PFC implementation and administrative costs.
    Decision Date: April 26, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Susan Moore, Orlando Airports District
Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Port of Portland, Portland, Oregon.
    Application Number: 11-11-C-00-PDX.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $327,509,220.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: August 1, 2020.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: March 1, 2031.
    Classes of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC'S:
    (1) Air taxi/commercial operators that offer non-scheduled/on-
demand air operations that enplane less than 2,500 passengers per year
at Portland International Airport (PDX); and (2) commuters or small
certificated air carriers that enplane less than 2,500 passengers per
year at PDX.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that each proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at PDX.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use at a
$4.50 PFC Level:
    South runway reconstruction (10R/28L).
    Deicing project.
    North runway reconstruction (10L/28R).
    Decision Date: April 28, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dave Roberts, Seattle Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Los Angeles World Airports, Los Angeles, California.
    Application Number: 11-08-C-00-LAX.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $3.00.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $29,107,609.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: March 1, 2019.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: June 1, 2019.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's:
    Air taxi/commercial operators--nonscheduled/on-demand air carriers
filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Los Angeles International Airport.
    Brief Description of Project Partially Approved for Collection and
Use:
    Lennox Schools soundproofing program.
    Determination: The FAA determined that several components of the
project were not PFC eligible in accordance with Sec.  158.15(b).
Specifically, the FAA disapproved all soundproofing work associated
with portable or relocatable classrooms as well as soundproofing of
several proposed rooms where activities would not be disrupted by
aircraft noise. The FAA also disapproved the use of PFC revenue to
replace existing

flooring with carpeting because carpeting does not provide sound
attenuation for aircraft noise. Finally, the FAA disapproved design
costs listed in the detailed cost information provided in the PFC
application because the public agency did not include design in its
description and justification of the project.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PARTIALLY APPROVED FOR COLLECTION:
    Lennox Schools soundproofing program (future sites).
    Determination: The FAA determined that several components of the
project were not PFC eligible in accordance with Sec.  158.15(b).
Specifically, the FAA disapproved all soundproofing work associated
with relocatable classrooms. The FAA also disapproved the use of PFC
revenue to install flooring as a part of the sound mitigation measures
because flooring does not provide sound attenuation for aircraft noise.
The FAA disapproved the line item identified as ``move management'' as
not being justified for this new construction. Finally, the FAA
disapproved design costs listed in the detailed cost information
provided in the PFC application because the public agency did not
include design in its description and justification of the project.
    Decision Date: May 2, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darlene Williams, Los Angeles Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: County of Westchester, White Plains, New York.
    Application Number: 11-06-C-00-HPN.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $8,000,000.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: October 1, 2011.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: August 1, 2013.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's:
    Non-scheduled/on-demand air carriers, filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Westchester County Airport.
    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT APPROVED FOR COLLECTION AND USE:
    Design and construction of conveyance and disposal system for
aircraft deicing fluid.
    Decision Date: May 5, 2011.
    For Further Information Contact: Andrew Brooks, New York Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Roanoke Regional Airport Commission, Roanoke,
Virginia.
    Application Number: 11-03-C-00-ROA.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $2,191,701.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: November 1, 2011.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: January 1, 2013.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's:
    Carriers required to file FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Roanoke Regional Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Noise mitigation program (65-69 DNL) phases 5 through 8.
    Rehabilitate apron (design and construction) phase 2.
    Update airport master plan.
    Rehabilitate runway 15/33--phase 3.
    Rehabilitate taxiways A and G--phase 3.
    Rehabilitate taxiway T.
    Acquire aircraft rescue and firefighting land.
    Remove obstructions in runway 15 runway protection zone.
    Acquire aircraft rescue and firefighting vehicle.
    Acquire aircraft deicing equipment.
    Acquire runway sweeper.
    PFC program formulation.
    Annual PFC administrative costs.
    Decision Date: May 16, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Breeden, Washington Airports
District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Public Agency: Airport Authority District Number 1 Calcasiu Parish,
Lake Charles, Louisiana.
    Application Number: 11-03-C-00-LCH.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $650,000.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: November 1, 2013.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: September 1, 2015.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's:
    Air taxi/commercial operators filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at Lake Charles Regional Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Acquisition of airport training system.
    Loading bridge baggage delivery systems.
    Airport access road lighting improvements.
    Airfield fencing improvements.
    Professional fees.
    Decision Date: May 20, 2011.
    For Further Information Contact: Justin Barker, Louisiana/New
Mexico Airports Development Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Public Agency: City of Tyler, Texas.
    Application Number: 11-05-C-00-TYR.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PFC Revenue Approved in This Decision: $1,782,732.
    Earliest Charge Effective Date: October 1, 2011.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: September 1, 2017.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's: None.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Construct service road.
    Planning study--airport update.
    Airfield lighting.
    Aircraft rescue and firefighting truck.
    Runway 13/31 safety area and visibility zone improvements.
    Runway 4/22 safety area improvements. Construct taxiway K.
    Gates.
    Wildlife hazard assessments.
    Security fencing.
    Install terminal flight information display system.
    Security improvements--finger print.
    PFC application and administration fees.
    Decision Date: May 20, 2011.
    For Further Information Contact:
    Guillermo Villalobos, Texas Airports Development Office, (817) 222-
5657.

    Public Agency: St Joseph County Airport Authority, South Bend,
Indiana.
    Application Number: 11-04-C-00-SBN.
    Application Type: Impose and use a PFC.
    PFC Level: $4.50.
    Total PEG Revenue Approved in This Decision: $6,000,000.

    Earliest Charge Effective Date: January 1, 2021.
    Estimated Charge Expiration Date: July 1, 2029.
    Class of Air Carriers Not Required To Collect PFC's: Non-scheduled/
on-demand air carriers, filing FAA Form 1800-31.
    Determination: Approved. Based on information contained in the
public agency's application, the FAA has determined that the proposed
class accounts for less than 1 percent of the total annual enplanements
at South Bend Regional Airport.
    Brief Description of Projects Approved for Collection and Use:
    Terminal expansion.
    Loading bridges.
    Access control.
    Public seating.
    Architectural services.
    Decision Date: May 23, 2011.
    For Further Information Contact:
    Gregory Sweeny, Chicago Airports District Office,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

                                                               Amendment to PFC Approvals
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    Amendment          Original     Amended approved      Original           Amended
                         Amendment No.                              approved      approved net PFC       net PFC      estimated charge  estimated charge
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
09-05-C-01-HPN White Plains, NY...............................          04/25/11       $18,000,000       $10,000,000          08/01/13          10/01/11
99-05-C-02-SBP San Luis Obispo, CA............................          05/02/11         1,040,111         1,057,676          07/01/15          06/01/14
02-07-C-01-SBP San Luis Obispo, CA............................          05/02/11         1,652,880         1,730,271          07/01/19          07/01/15
10-16-C-01-BNA Nashville, TN..................................          05/03/11         4,290,000         5,502,500          12/01/16          01/01/17
08-08-C-01-SMF Sacramento, CA.................................          05/12/11       603,497,524       676,588,317          02/01/28          11/01/34
03-05-C-01-EUG Eugene, OR.....................................          05/18/11         2,032,935         2,518,402          07/01/05          06/01/06
06-08-C-01-EUG Eugene, OR.....................................          05/18/11         2,645,000         2,633,131          05/01/09          07/01/09
*06-03-C-02-ABQ Albuquerque, NM...............................          05/19/11        68,885,899        78,203,803          07/01/16          10/01/17
04-08-C-04-RNO Reno, NV.......................................          05/20/11        49,500,000        53,000,000          07/01/07          07/01/07
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notes: The amendment denoted by an asterisk (*) includes a change
to the PFC level charged from $3.00 per enplaned passenger to $4.50 per
enplaned passenger. For Albuquerque, NM, this change is effective on
July 1, 2011.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 2, 2011.
Joe Hebert,
Manager, Financial Analysis and Passenger Facility Charge Branch.
[FR Doc. 2011-14372 Filed 6-9-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 197 (Wednesday, October 12, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 70460]
[FR Doc No: 2016-24731]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold an open meeting on Thursday, October
13, 2016 at 10 a.m., in the Auditorium, Room L-002.
    The subject matters of the open meeting will be:
     The Commission will consider whether to adopt new rules
and forms and amendments to certain rules and forms to modernize the
reporting of information by registered investment companies.
     The Commission will consider whether to adopt a new rule
and amendments to certain rules and forms that would provide for
liquidity risk management programs and related disclosures for open-end
management investment companies.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted, or postponed, please contact Brent J. Fields in
the Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 6, 2016.
Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-24731 Filed 10-7-16; 11:15 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: February 14, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 30)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 7678-7679]
[DOCID:fr14fe06-3]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

17 CFR Part 232

[Release Nos. 33-8590A; 34-52052A; 35-28002A; 39-2437A; IC-26990A; File
No. S7-16-04]
RIN 3235-AH79

Rulemaking for EDGAR System

AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission.

ACTION: Final rule; technical amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Securities and Exchange Commission published a document in
the Federal Register on July 27, 2005 (70 FR 43558) expanding the
information that we require certain investment company filers to submit
to us electronically through our Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis,
and Retrieval (EDGAR) system. That document contained an incorrect
instruction to Sec.  232.101(b). This document corrects Sec.
232.101(b).

DATES: Effective Date: February 8, 2006.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ruth Armfield Sanders, Senior Special
Counsel, Division of Investment Management, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission is making a technical
correction to Sec.  232.101 by adding paragraph (b)(9).

List of Subjects in 17 CFR Part 232

    Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business
information, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Securities.

0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 17 CFR part 232 is amended
as follows:

PART 232--REGULATION S-T--GENERAL RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR
ELECTRONIC FILINGS

0
1. The authority citation for Part 232 continues to read in part as
follows:

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 77f, 77g, 77h, 77j, 77s(a), 77sss(a),
78c(b), 78l, 78m, 78n, 78o(d), 78w(a), 78ll(d), 79t(a), 80a-8, 80a-
29, 80a-30, 80a-37, and 7201 et seq.; and 18 U.S.C. 1350.
* * * * *

0
2. Amend Sec.  232.101 by:
0
a. Removing the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (b)(7);
0
b. Removing the period at the end of paragraph (b)(8) and in its place
adding ``; and''; and
0
c. Adding paragraph (b)(9).
    The addition reads as follows.

Sec.  232.101  Mandated electronic submissions and exceptions.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (9) Documents filed with the Commission pursuant to section 33 of
the Investment Company Act (15 U.S.C. 80a-32).
* * * * *

    Dated: February 8, 2006.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-1322 Filed 2-13-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 111 (Tuesday, June 9, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 35344]
[FR Doc No: 2020-12396]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-408, OMB Control No. 3235-0464]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 101

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (``OMB'') a request for approval of extension of the
previously approved collection of information provided for in Rule 101
of Regulation M (17 CFR 242.101), under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.).
    Rule 101 prohibits distribution participants from purchasing
activities at specified times during a distribution of securities.
Persons otherwise covered by this rule may seek to use several
applicable exceptions such as a calculation of the average daily
trading volume of the securities in distribution, the maintenance of
policies regarding information barriers between their affiliates, and
the maintenance of a written policy regarding general compliance with
Regulation M for de minimus transactions.
    There are approximately 1,589 respondents per year that require an
aggregate total of 27,215 hours to comply with this rule. Each
respondent makes an estimated 1 annual response. Each response takes on
average approximately 17.127 hours to complete. Thus, the total
compliance burden per year is 27,215 burden hours. The total estimated
internal labor compliance cost for the respondents is approximately
$1,905,050.00, resulting in an internal cost of compliance for each
respondent per response of approximately $1,198.90 (i.e., $1,905,050/
1,589 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view background documentation for this information
collection at the following website: >www.reginfo.gov<. Find this
particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day
Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice
to (i) >www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain< and (ii) David Bottom,
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Cynthia Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or by
sending an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: June 3, 2020.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-12396 Filed 6-8-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 135 (Thursday, July 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45476-45477]
[FR Doc No: 2016-16708]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0338; FRL-9948-03]

Alpha-chlorohydrin and Hydrogen Cyanamide Registration Review
Interim Decisions; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's interim
registration review decisions for the pesticides alpha-chlorohydrin
(case 4120) and hydrogen cyanamide (case 7005). Registration review is
EPA's periodic review of pesticide registrations to ensure that each
pesticide continues to satisfy the statutory standard for registration,
that is, that the pesticide can perform its intended function without
causing unreasonable adverse effects on human health or the
environment. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each
pesticide's registration is based on current scientific and other
knowledge, including its effects on human health and the environment.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    For pesticide specific information, contact: The Chemical Review
Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the table in Unit
II., Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001.
    For general information on the registration review program,
contact: Richard Dumas, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 308-8015; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the Chemical Review Manager for the pesticide of interest
identified in the table in Unit II.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    The docket for this action, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2016-0338 is available at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Please review the visitor instructions and
additional information about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. What action is the agency taking?

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), this notice announces the
availability of EPA's interim registration review decisions for the
pesticides shown in the following table.

                                  Table--Interim Registration Review Decisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Registration review case name and                                                   Chemical review manager,
                No.                            Pesticide docket ID No.           telephone number, email address
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alpha-chlorohydrin, Case 4120......  EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0726......................  Matthew Manupella, (703) 347-
                                                                                0411,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Hydrogen cyanamide, Case 7005......  EPA-HQ-OPP-2007-1014......................  Dana L. Friedman, (703) 347-
                                                                                8827<EMAIL_ADDRESS>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Alpha-chlorohydrin. The registration review docket for alpha-
chlorohydrin opened in December 2015. For alpha-chlorohydrin, the
Agency expedited the registration review and opened the docket with the
proposed interim decision and supporting documents. The only registered
use for alpha-chlorohydrin is as a tamper-proof bait station/bait
application delivery system for elimination of Norway rats. Alpha-
chlorohydrin is approved for use in and around commercial/industrial
facilities and sanitary sewers. The label prohibits the use of the
product in any facility where children may be present, and no outdoor
uses are permitted. Exposure to pollinators is unlikely because alpha-
chlorohydrin is deployed in a bait station. Therefore, pollinator data
will not be required, nor will exposure to pollinators be assessed. The
Agency has made the following interim decision: (1) No additional data
are required at this time; (2) no changes to the affected registrations
or their labeling are needed at this time; and (3) EPA does not expect
alpha-chlorohydrin to have direct or indirect adverse effects to non-
listed, and listed species or to adversely modify any designated
critical habitat for such species, and is making a ``no effect''
determination under the Endangered Species Act for all listed species
and designated critical habitat for such species. At this time, EPA is
making no human health or environmental safety findings associated with
the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) screening of alpha-
chlorohydrin. EPA's registration review decision for alpha-chlorohydrin
will depend upon the result of an EDSP Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic
Act (FFDCA) section 408(p) determination.
    Hydrogen cyanamide. Hydrogen cyanamide is a plant growth regulator
used to promote uniform bud break in orchard fruit trees and vines;
there are no residential uses. It is the only registered plant growth
regulator available to induce uniform bud break in United States fruit
production, and there are significant economic benefits associated with
its use in areas where the critical number of chilling hours needed for
bud break do not occur or are

not consistent. The Agency conducted a comprehensive human health risk
assessment and determined that there are potential risks of concern for
occupational handlers, as well as spray drift concerns for bystanders.
The occupational risks can be mitigated through modifications to the
cyanamide label, and spray drift concerns are addressed by a distance
restriction for bystanders. The Agency also conducted an ecological
risk assessment and determined that there are potential risks of
concern for terrestrial animals, but current use practices and label
mitigation address many of these concerns. In this Interim Registration
Review Decision, EPA is making no human health or environmental safety
findings associated with the EDSP screening of cyanamide or risks to
pollinators, nor is it making a complete endangered species finding.
The Agency's final registration review decision is dependent upon the
assessment of risks to threatened and endangered species, and to
pollinators, and of potential endocrine disruptor risk.
    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.57, a registration review decision is the
Agency's determination whether a pesticide meets, or does not meet, the
standard for registration in FIFRA. EPA has considered alpha-
chlorohydrin and hydrogen cyanamide in light of the FIFRA standard for
registration. The Interim Decision documents in the docket for these
pesticides describe the Agency's rationale for issuing the interim
decisions.
    In addition to the interim registration review decision documents,
the registration review dockets for alpha-chlorohydrin and hydrogen
cyanamide include other relevant documents related to the registration
review of these pesticides. The proposed interim registration review
decisions were posted to the docket and the public was invited to
submit any comments or new information. EPA addressed the comments or
information received during the comment period in the discussions for
alpha-chlorohydrin and hydrogen cyanamide. During the 60-day comment
period, the public comments received for both pesticides did not affect
the Agency's interim decisions. Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the
registration review case dockets for alpha-chlorohydrin and hydrogen
cyanamide will remain open until all actions required in the interim
decision have been completed.
    Background on the registration review program is provided at:
http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_review. Links to earlier
documents related to the registration review of this pesticide are
provided at: http://www.epa.gov/oppsrrd1/registration_review/reg_review_status.htm.

    Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: July 6, 2016.
Michael Goodis,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016-16708 Filed 7-13-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 199 (Monday, October 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62843-62845]
[FR Doc No: 2022-22458]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2022-0606; FRL-10105-03-OAR]

Notice of Data Availability Relevant to Management of Regulated
Substances Under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of data availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Notice of Data Availability (NODA) is to alert
stakeholders of information from the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) regarding the United States' hydrofluorocarbon reclamation
market and to solicit stakeholder input. The Agency is making available
a draft report, Analysis of the U.S. Hydrofluorocarbon Reclamation
Market: Stakeholders, Drivers, and Practices, which analyzes the United
States' hydrofluorocarbon reclamation market and describes the
reclamation process, factors affecting costs of reclamation,
incentives, and barriers to refrigerant reclamation. The Agency is
providing this information in preparation for an upcoming regulatory
action which EPA intends to propose under subsection (h) of the
American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of 2020. The notice
identifies possible data gaps and requests comment on areas where
additional information could improve the Agency's information on the
United States hydrofluorocarbon reclamation market and practices. The
Agency is also providing notice of a stakeholder meeting to enable
stakeholders to provide input as the Agency prepares to engage in
rulemaking.

DATES: To ensure that comments can be accounted for in an upcoming
proposed rule that EPA is considering, please submit comments to the
Agency by November 7, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OAR-2022-0606, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov/
(our preferred method). Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Docket
Center, Air and Radiation Docket, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery or Courier (by scheduled appointment only):
EPA Docket Center, WJC West Building, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Avenue

NW, Washington, DC 20004. The Docket Center's hours of operations are
8:30 a.m.-4:30 p.m., Monday-Friday (except Federal Holidays).
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received may be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal information
provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and additional
information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Public Participation''
heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Annie Kee, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Stratospheric Protection Division, telephone number:
202-564-2056; or email address: [email protected]. You may also visit
EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/climate-hfcs-reduction for further
information.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Public Participation

    The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is interested in
receiving comments on the draft report developed in support of this
notice of data availability (NODA) to inform the Agency's regulatory
process for an upcoming proposed rule that EPA is considering. Submit
your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2022-0606, at
https://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), or the other
methods identified in the ADDRESSES section. You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your comments: Explain your views as
clearly as possible; describe any assumptions that you used; provide
any technical information or data you used that support your views;
provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns; offer
alternatives; and make sure to submit your comments by the comment
period deadline identified. Please provide any published studies or raw
data supporting your position. Confidential Business Information (CBI)
should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov. Please work with
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section if
submitting a comment containing CBI.

II. Background

    The Agency is providing information in preparation for an upcoming
regulatory action under the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act
of 2020 (AIM Act or Act), codified at 42 U.S.C. 7675. Among other
provisions, subsection (h) of the Act authorizes EPA to establish
certain requirements for management of certain hydrofluorocarbons
(HFCs) and their substitutes. Specifically, subsection (h)(1) of the
Act directs the Agency to establish regulations to control, where
appropriate, practices, processes, or activities regarding the
servicing, repair, disposal, or installation of equipment, for purposes
of maximizing the reclamation and minimizing the release of certain
HFCs from equipment and ensuring the safety of technicians and
consumers. Subsection (h) also provides that ``[i]n carrying out this
section, the Administrator shall consider the use of authority
available to the Administrator under this section to increase
opportunities for the reclaiming of regulated substances used as
refrigerants'' (subsection (h)(2)(A)) and authorizes EPA in
promulgating regulations carrying out subsection (h) of the AIM Act to
``coordinate those regulations with any other [EPA] regulations''
involving ``the same or a similar practice, process, or activity
regarding the servicing, repair, disposal, or installation of
equipment,'' or reclaiming (subsection (h)(3)). Such regulations could
potentially include the refrigerant management program established
under title VI of the Clean Air Act.
    EPA is seeking comment on the accuracy of the data and analyses
presented in the draft report in the docket to this notice regarding
the United States' hydrofluorocarbon refrigerant reclamation market and
welcomes input on those data and potential data gaps. Readers should
note that EPA will only consider comments about the draft report
provided in the docket, and the Agency is not soliciting comments on
any other topic through this notice. EPA plans to undergo a future
notice and comment rulemaking process, which will be a separate action,
that will outline the Agency's approach to the management of HFCs and
their substitutes under the AIM Act. EPA will solicit public feedback
on these issues through that separate notice and comment process, and
therefore is not accepting public comment on these matters through this
notice. Public comments that pertain to issues beyond the scope of this
notice will not be considered as the Agency updates the draft report.
To the extent such comments are relevant to the previously referenced
future and separate rulemaking, those comments should be resubmitted
through that future rulemaking process in order to ensure that they are
duly considered by the Agency in that process. Use of AIM Act
terminology in this notice is for communication purposes only and
should not be viewed as indications of how EPA will define these terms
in any future rulemaking action. EPA intends to provide more
information on the status of rulemakings and stakeholder interaction,
including opportunities for submitting public comment, on the Agency's
website: https://www.epa.gov/climate-hfcs-reduction. EPA will hold a
virtual stakeholder meeting for input on the draft report and an
upcoming regulatory action which EPA intends to propose under
subsection (h) of the American Innovation and Manufacturing Act of
2020. Information concerning this meeting will be available on the
Agency's website: https://www.epa.gov/climate-hfcs-reduction.

III. What information is available?

    This notice provides for public review and comment on the draft
report, Analysis of the U.S. Hydrofluorocarbon Reclamation Market:
Stakeholders, Drivers, and Practices, that is available in the docket.
The draft report describes EPA's current understanding of the U.S. HFC
refrigerant reclamation market and provides information on the
reclamation process, factors affecting costs of reclamation,
incentives, and barriers to reclamation. EPA requests comment on the
information and analysis in the draft report, and information on
potential data gaps.
    The report provides background information on the reclamation
industry in support of an upcoming proposed rule that EPA is
considering under subsection (h) of the AIM Act to establish
regulations to control, where appropriate, practices, processes, or
activities regarding the servicing, repair, disposal, or installation
of equipment, for purposes of maximizing the reclamation and minimizing
the release of certain HFCs from equipment and ensuring the safety of
technicians and consumers. The draft report provides information on the
following:

 Background information on the refrigerant reclamation of HFCs,
federal and state statutory and regulatory provisions
 Subsectors and applications using refrigerants
 Historical reclamation market in the U.S., the reclamation
process, factors affecting costs of reclamation, and incentives for
refrigerant reclamation
 Safety of technicians and consumers
 Barriers and key challenges to refrigerant reclamation.

IV. What is EPA taking comment on and what supporting documentation do
I need to include in my comments?

    EPA is accepting comments on possible data gaps and areas where
additional information could improve the Agency's information outlined
in this notice and contained in the draft report, Analysis of the U.S.
Hydrofluorocarbon Reclamation Market: Stakeholders, Drivers, and
Practices. Specifically, EPA requests comment on topics contained in
the draft report, including but not limited to:

 Current reclamation process, practices, and technologies
 Supply chain of reclaimed refrigerants (e.g., recovery,
collection, stockpiling, destruction)
 Costs of reclamation (e.g., price of refrigerants, transport,
storage, operating costs of reclamation systems)
 Incentives for reclamation
 Safety of technicians and consumers (e.g., outreach, best
practices)
 Barriers and challenges to reclamation (e.g., contamination
and accommodation of blends and cylinders with mixed refrigerants,
market demand).

    EPA is also interested in responses to any of the following
questions related to this draft report, including but not limited to:
     Current recovery and reclamation practices, technologies,
and trends:
    [cir] What are some major changes and/or trends in reclamation
technology and equipment over the past 25 years?
    [cir] What are the current trends for the price of refrigerants and
how can this affect reclamation and recovery?
    [cir] How do reclaimers address waste oils, impurities, etc.?
    [cir] What type of equipment do reclaimers use (e.g., off-the-shelf
reclamation equipment, modified off-the-shelf reclamation equipment,
custom-built equipment)?
    [cir] What are the current practices for refrigerant recovery at
equipment end-of-life?
     Supply chain:
    [cir] What are the primary sources of recovered refrigerant
(technicians, distributors, wholesalers, etc.)? Stationary vs. motor
vehicle air conditioning systems?
    [cir] Are Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) purchasing
reclaimed HFCs for initial equipment charge?
    [cir] Besides refrigeration and air conditioning (e.g., fire
suppression), are there other sectors where reclaimed or reprocessed
HFCs are being used?
     Barriers and challenges to recovery and reclamation:
    [cir] What are major barriers to increasing the amount of
refrigerant recovered and reclaimed? For example, increasing the amount
of reclaimed material re-entering the market or the increased use of
reclaimed material in other sectors (i.e., beyond refrigeration and air
conditioning)?
    [cir] What are the losses of refrigerant during recovery and/or the
reclamation process (e.g., chronic leaking) and what steps can be taken
to minimize the losses (e.g., best practices, technologies)?
    [cir] How are multi-component refrigerant blends handled during
recovery and/or the reclamation process?
    EPA requests that commenters provide corrected information or
suggested language on the draft report, along with the rationale as to
why the existing text was incorrect or incomplete. In addition, please
provide any published studies or raw data supporting your comments.

Cynthia A. Newberg,
Director, Stratospheric Protection Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-22458 Filed 10-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 3, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 127)]
[Notices]
[Page 37971-37974]
[DOCID:fr03jy06-83]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54045; File No. SR-PCX-2005-115]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Pacific Exchange, Inc. (n/k/a NYSE
Arca, Inc.); Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change and Amendment
Nos. 1 and 2 Thereto and Order Granting Partial Accelerated Approval
Relating to Trading Shares of the Funds of the ProShares Trust Pursuant
to Unlisted Trading Privileges

June 26, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 11, 2005, the Pacific Exchange, Inc.

(n/k/a NYSE Arca, Inc.) (the ``Exchange''), through its wholly owned
subsidiary PCX Equities, Inc. (n/k/a/ NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.) (``NYSE
Arca Equities'' or the ``Corporation''), filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as
described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by
the Exchange.\3\ The Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change on November 21, 2005.\4\ The Exchange filed Amendment No. 2
to the proposed rule change on May 5, 2006.\5\ On June 21, 2006, the
Commission published the proposed rule change for notice from
interested persons and partially approved on an accelerated basis, as
amended, that portion of the proposal pertaining to the trading,
pursuant to unlisted trading privileges (``UTP''), of the Shares of the
Ultra 500 Fund, Ultra 100 Fund, Ultra 30 Fund, Ultra Mid-Cap 400 Fund,
Short 500 Fund, Short 100 Fund, Short 30 Fund, Short Mid-Cap 400 Fund
and the portion of the proposal pertaining to NYSE Arca Equities Rule
9.2(a).\6\ The Commission is now approving on an accelerated basis the
remainder of the proposed rule change, as amended, pertaining to the
trading, pursuant to UTP, of the Shares of the Ultra Short 500 Fund,
Ultra Short 100 Fund, Ultra Short 30 Fund, and Ultra Short Mid-Cap 400
Fund.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ On March 6, 2006, the Pacific Exchange, Inc. (``PCX''),
filed with the Commission a proposed rule change, which was
effective upon filing, to change the name of the Exchange, as well
as several other related entities, to reflect Archipelago's recent
acquisition of PCX and the merger of the NYSE with Archipelago. See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56315 (April 7, 2006), 71 FR
19226 (April 13, 2006) (File No. SR-PCX-2006-24). All references
herein have been changed to reflect these transactions. Telephone
Conference between Lisa Dallmer, Director, NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.,
and Florence E. Harmon, Senior Special Counsel, Division of Market
Regulation (``Division''), Commission, on June 21, 2006.
    \4\ Amendment No. 1 replaced and superseded the original filing
in its entirety.
    \5\ Amendment No. 2 replaced and superseded Amendment No. 1 in
its entirety.
    \6\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54026 (June 21, 2006)
(``NYSE Arca Order'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange, through its wholly owned subsidiary NYSE Arca
Equities, proposes to trade shares (``Shares''), pursuant to UTP, the
following four funds of the ProShares Trust (f/k/a xtraShares Trust)
(the ``Trust''): Ultra Short 500 Fund, Ultra Short 100 Fund, Ultra
Short 30 Fund and Ultra Short Mid-Cap 400 Fund (the ``Funds'').

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item III below, and is set forth in Sections A, B, and C below.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3), the Exchange may propose
to list and/or trade pursuant to UTP ``Investment Company Shares.''
With this filing, the Exchange proposes to trade pursuant to UTP the
Shares of the Funds under NYSE Arca Equities Rule 5.2(j)(3). The
Exchange represents that the Shares, which seek to provide investment
results that correspond to the inverse or opposite of twice the inverse
or opposite (-200%) of the index's daily performance, qualify as
Investment Company Shares as defined in NYSE Arca Equities Rule
5.2(j)(3). To accommodate the trading of the Shares, the Exchange has
amended NYSE Arca Equities Rule 9.2(a) (``Diligence as to Accounts''),
as more fully described in the NYSE Arca Order. The Commission also
previously approved the trading, pursuant to UTP, of the Shares of
eight of the Funds on the Exchange in the NYSE Arca Order.
    The four Funds--the Ultra Short 500, Ultra Short 100, Ultra Short
30, and Ultra Short Mid-Cap400 Funds (the ``Additional Bearish
Funds'')--seek daily investment results, before fees and expenses, that
correspond to twice (or two times) the inverse or opposite (-200%) of
the daily performance of the S&P 500, Nasdaq 100, DJIA and S&P MidCap,
respectively. If each of these Funds is successful in meeting its
objective, the net asset value (the ``NAV'') of the Shares of each Fund
should increase approximately twice as much, on a percentage basis, as
the respective Underlying Index loses when the prices of the securities
in the Index decline on a given day, or should decrease approximately
twice as much as the respective Underlying Index gains when the prices
of the securities in the Index rise on a given day. A description of
the Shares, dissemination of information about the Shares and the
Funds' underlying indexes, surveillance procedures applicable to
trading of the Shares on the Exchange, and the Exchange's information
bulletin pertaining to the Shares is set forth in the NYSE Arca
Order.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54040 (June 23,
2006) (SR-AMEX-2006-41 (the ``Amex Order'') (approval to list and
trade on Amex the Ultra Short 500 Fund, Ultra Short 100 Fund, Ultra
Short 30 Fund and Ultra Short Mid-Cap 400 Fund).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) UTP Trading Criteria
    The Exchange represents that it will cease trading the Shares of a
Fund during the listing market's trading hours if: (a) The listing
market stops trading the Shares because of a regulatory halt similar to
a halt based on NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.12 or a halt because the IIV
or the value of the applicable Underlying Index is no longer available
at least every 15 seconds or the NAV is not disseminated to all market
participants at the same time \8\ or (b) the listing market delists the
Shares. Additionally, the Exchange may cease trading the Shares of a
Fund if such other event shall occur or condition exists which in the
opinion of the Exchange makes further dealings on the Exchange
inadvisable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Telephone Conference between Lisa Dallmer, Director, NYSE
Arca Equities, Inc., and Florence E. Harmon, Senior Special Counsel,
Division, Commission, on June 26, 2006 (as to simultaneous NAV
dissemination).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

(b) Trading Rules
    The Exchange deems the Shares to be equity securities, thus
rendering trading in the Shares subject to the Exchange's existing
rules governing the trading of equity securities. Shares will trade on
the NYSE Arca Marketplace from 9:30 a.m. ET until 8 p.m. ET, even if
the IIV is not disseminated from 4:15 p.m. ET to 8 p.m. ET.\9\ The
Exchange states that it has appropriate rules to facilitate
transactions in the Shares during all trading sessions. The minimum
trading increment for Shares on the Exchange will be $0.01.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Because National Securities Clearing Corporation (``NSCC'')
does not disseminate the new basket amount to market participants
until approximately 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. ET, an updated IIV is not
possible to calculate during the Exchange's late trading session.
The Exchange also states that currently the official index sponsors
for the Funds' indexes do not calculate updated index values during
the Exchange's late trading session; however, if the index sponsors
did so in the future, the Exchange will not trade this product
unless such official index value is widely disseminated. Telephone
Conference between Lisa Dallmer, Director, NYSE Arca Equities, Inc.,
and Florence E. Harmon, Senior Special Counsel, Division,
Commission, on June 21, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With respect to trading halts, the Exchange may consider all
relevant factors in exercising its discretion to halt or suspend
trading in the Shares of a Fund. Trading may be halted because

of market conditions or for reasons that, in the view of the Exchange,
make trading in the Shares inadvisable. These may include: (1) The
extent to which trading is not occurring in the securities comprising
an Underlying Index and/or the Financial Instruments of a Fund, or (2)
whether other unusual conditions or circumstances detrimental to the
maintenance of a fair and orderly market are present. In addition,
trading in Shares will be subject to trading halts caused by
extraordinary market volatility pursuant to the Exchange's ``circuit
breaker'' rule \10\ or by the halt or suspension of trading of the
underlying securities.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.12.
    \11\ See ``UTP Trading Criteria'' above for specific instances
when the Exchange will cease trading the Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Shares will be deemed ``Eligible Listed Securities,'' as defined in
NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.55, for purposes of the Intermarket Trading
System (``ITS'') Plan and therefore will be subject to the trade
through provisions of NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.56, which require that
ETP Holders avoid initiating trade-throughs for ITS securities.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\13\ in particular, in that it is
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transaction in securities, to remove impediments and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent
with Rule 12f-5 under the Act \14\ because it deems the Shares to be
equity securities, thus rendering the Shares subject to the Exchange's
existing rules governing the trading of equity securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 240.12f-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-PCX-2005-115 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PCX-2005-115. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-PCX-2005-115 and should be submitted on or before July
24, 2006.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Partial
Approval of Proposed Rule Change

    The Commission previously approved the portion of the proposed rule
change, as amended, pertaining to the trading pursuant to UTP of eight
Funds: Ultra 500 Fund, Ultra 100 Fund, Ultra 30 Fund, Ultra Mid-Cap 400
Fund, Short 500 Fund, Short 100 Fund, Short 30 Fund, and Short Mid-Cap
400 Fund (``Original Funds'').\15\ The Commission also previously
approved the Exchange's Rule 9.2(a) with respect to ``Diligence to
Accounts.'' \16\ The Commission is now approving the portion of the
proposed rule change, as amended, pertaining to the trading pursuant to
UTP of the four remaining Funds: Ultra Short 500 Fund, Ultra Short 100
Fund, Ultra Short 30 Fund, Ultra Short Mid-Cap 400 Fund (``Subsequent
Funds''). With regard to the trading pursuant to UTP of the Subsequent
Funds, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as amended,
is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities
exchange.\17\ In particular, the Commission finds that the portion of
the proposed rule change pertaining to the Subsequent Funds is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ which requires that an
exchange have rules designed, among other things, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and
in general to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See NYSE Arca Order, supra, note 6.
    \16\  Id.
    \17\ In approving this rule change, the Commission notes that it
has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Commission finds that the portion of the proposal
pertaining to the trading of the Original Funds is consistent with
Section 12(f) of the Act,\19\ which permits an exchange to trade,
pursuant to UTP, a security that is listed and registered on another
exchange.\20\ The Commission notes that

it previously approved the listing and trading of the Shares of all of
the Funds on the Amex and the trading, pursuant to UTP, of the Original
Funds on the Exchange.\21\ The Commission also finds that the proposal
is consistent with Rule 12f-5 under the Act,\22\ which provides that an
exchange shall not extend UTP to a security unless the exchange has in
effect a rule or rules providing for transactions in the class or type
of security to which the exchange extends UTP. NYSEArca rules deem the
Shares to be equity securities, thus trading in the Shares will be
subject to the Exchange's existing rules governing the trading of
equity securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78l(f).
    \20\ Section 12(a) of the Act, 15 U.S.C. 78l(a), generally
prohibits a broker-dealer from trading a security on a national
securities exchange unless the security is registered on that
exchange pursuant to Section 12 of the Act. Section 12(f) of the Act
excludes from this restriction trading in any security to which an
exchange ``extends UTP.'' When an exchange extends UTP to a
security, it allows its members to trade the security as if it were
listed and registered on the exchange even though it is not so
listed and registered.
    \21\ See Amex Order, supra note 7.
    \22\ 17 CFR 240.12f-5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission further believes that the proposal is consistent
with Section 11A(a)(1)(C)(iii) of the Act,\23\ which sets forth
Congress's finding that it is in the public interest and appropriate
for the protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and orderly
markets to assure the availability to brokers, dealers, and investors
of information with respect to quotations for and transactions in
securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-(a)(1)(C)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In connection with the Exchange's UTP of the Shares of the
Subsequent Funds, the Exchange will cease trading in the Shares if: (1)
The listing market stops trading the Shares because of a regulatory
halt similar to NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.12 or a halt because the
Indicative Partnership Value or the value of the applicable Underlying
Index is no longer available (at least every 15 seconds during the
trading day), or the NAV is not disseminated to all market participants
at the same time, or (b) the listing market delists the Shares.
Additionally, the Exchange may cease trading the Shares if such other
event shall occur or condition exists which in the opinion of the
Exchange makes further dealings on the Exchange inadvisable.
    In support of the portion of the proposed rule change regarding UTP
of the Shares, of the Original Funds, the Exchange has made the
following representations:
    1. The Exchange has appropriate rules to facilitate transactions in
this type of security in all trading sessions.
    2. The Exchange's surveillance procedures are adequate to properly
monitor the trading of the Shares on the Exchange.
    3. The Exchange will distribute an Information Bulletin to its
members prior to the commencement of trading of the Shares on the
Exchange that explains the special characteristics and risks of trading
the Shares.
    4. The Exchange will require a member with a customer who purchases
newly issued Shares on the Exchange to provide that customer with a
product prospectus and will note this prospectus delivery requirement
in the Information Bulletin.
    5. The Exchange will cease trading in the Shares if (1) the listing
market stops trading the Shares because of a regulatory halt similar to
a halt based on NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.12 and/or a halt because the
Indicative Partnership Value or the value of the applicable Underlying
Index is no longer available at least every 15 seconds or the NAV is
not disseminated to all market participants at the same time, or (2)
the listing market delists the Shares.
    This approval order is conditioned on the Exchange's adherence to
these representations.
    The Commission finds good cause for partially approving the
remaining portion of this proposed rule change with regard to the UTP
of the Subsequent Funds before the thirtieth day after the publication
of notice thereof in the Federal Register. As noted previously, the
Commission previously found that the listing and trading of these
Shares on the Amex is consistent with the Act.\24\ The Commission
presently is not aware of any issue that would cause it to revisit that
earlier finding or preclude the trading of these funds on the Exchange
pursuant to UTP. Therefore, accelerating approval of this proposed rule
change should benefit investors by creating, without undue delay,
additional competition in the market for these Shares.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See Amex Order, supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (SR-PCX-2005-115), as amended, is hereby
partially approved on an accelerated basis.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E6-10335 Filed 6-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register: October 4, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 192)]
[Notices]
[Page 56732]
[DOCID:fr04oc07-43]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP07-450-000]

MoGas Pipeline LLC; Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization

September 27, 2007.
    Take notice that on September 21, 2007, MoGas Pipeline LLC (MoGas),
110 Algana Court, St. Peters, Missouri, 63386, filed in Docket No.
CP07-450-000, a prior notice request pursuant to sections 157.205 and
157.210 of the Commission's regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA)
for authorization to construct and operate certain natural gas pipeline
facilities, all as more fully set forth in the application, which is on
file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing may
also be viewed on the Web at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''

link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    MoGas proposes to construct and operate a 4,920 horsepower mainline
natural gas compressor station in Pike County, Missouri at its
interconnection with the Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company. MoGas
states that the proposed facilities are designed to increase the
capacity on its pipeline system by 100,804 Dth per day. MoGas states
that the estimated cost of the proposed facilities is $6,580,000. MoGas
also says that earlier in the year, it conducted an open season for the
capacity created by this project and that the project is supported by
precedent agreements covering all of the capacity initially created by
the project.
    Any questions regarding the application should be directed to David
J. Ries, President, MoGas Pipeline LLC, 10 Algana Court, St. Peters,
Missouri 63386, phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any person or the Commission's Staff may, within 60 days after the
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and, pursuant to section 157.205 of
the Commission's Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205) a protest
to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed
therefore, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized
effective the day after the time allowed for protest.
    If a protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days, the time
allowed for the resolution of issues raised in the protest, then this
prior notice request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA (18 CFR 157.205(f)).
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests, and interventions via the Internet in lieu of paper; see 18
CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-19589 Filed 10-3-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 26, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 70569]
[FR Doc No: 2013-28313]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2013-0039]

Technical Mapping Advisory Council

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On November 1, 2013, the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) published a notice in the Federal Register requesting
applications from qualified individuals for appointment to the
Technical Mapping Advisory Council (TMAC). The notice incorrectly
stated that contractors and potential contractors will not be
considered for membership on the TMAC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Godesky, 1800 South Bell
Street, Arlington, Virginia 20598-3035, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In its Federal Register notice of November
1, 2013 (78 FR 65689), FEMA incorrectly stated that contractors and
potential contractors will not be considered for membership on the
TMAC. FEMA will consider contractors and potential contractors on a
case by case basis, but they may be subject to additional membership
restrictions in order to comply with Federal ethics requirements.

    Dated: November 20, 2013.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2013-28313 Filed 11-25-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register: May 28, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 101)]
[Notices]
[Page 25527-25528]
[DOCID:fr28my09-46]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

May 18, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
    Docket Numbers: EG09-42-000.
    Applicants: Astoria Energy II LLC.
    Description: Notice of EWG Self-Certification of Astoria Energy II
LLC.
    Filed Date: 05/15/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090515-5079.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, June 5, 2009.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER96-719-025; ER97-2801-026; ER99-2156-018.
    Applicants: MidAmerican Energy Company; PacifiCorp; Cordova Energy
Company LLC.
    Description: MidAmerican Energy Company et al. submits revisions to
their respective market based rate tariffs.
    Filed Date: 05/15/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090518-0124.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, June 5, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-762-012; ER03-533-004.
    Applicants: Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc.; Alliant Energy
Neenah, LLC.
    Description: Updated Market Power Analysis of Alliant Energy
Corporate Services, Inc and Alliant Energy Neenah, LLC.
    Filed Date: 05/14/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090518-0066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 4, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-46-004; ER08-332-003; OA07-7-003; OA08-72-003.
    Applicants: NorthWestern Corporation.
    Description: NorthWestern Corporation submits Substitute First
Revised Sheet 73A et al. to FERC Electric Tariff, Seventh Revised
Volume 5.
    Filed Date: 05/11/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090512-0047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 1, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-409-002.
    Applicants: WestConnect.
    Description: Public Service Company of Colorado submits First
Revised Volume No 7 to the WestConnect point to point regional
transmission service experiment tariff of PSCo et al.
    Filed Date: 05/15/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090518-0103.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, June 5, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-626-002.
    Applicants: Participating Transmission Owners Administrative
Committee.
    Description: PTO Administrative Committee submits revised
compliance filing to incorporate by reference into their sections of
the ISO Tariff of the Wholesale Electric Quadrant Standard 012, etc.
    Filed Date: 05/15/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090518-0104.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, June 5, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-666-002; ER09-667-002; ER09-668-002; ER09-669-
002; ER09-670-002; ER09-671-002.
    Applicants: EDFD-Handsome Lake; EDFD-Perryman; EDFD-Keystone; EDFD-
Conemaugh; EDFD-C.P. Crane; EDFD-West Valley.
    Description: EDFD Subsidiaries submits compliance filing in
accordance with the Commission's 3/16/09 letter order.
    Filed Date: 05/15/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090518-0101.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, June 5, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-757-001.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest ISO submits revisions to its Open Access
Transmission, Energy and Operating Reserve Markets Tariff.
    Filed Date: 05/15/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090518-0102.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, June 5, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-760-001.
    Applicants: Red Shield Acquisition, LLC.
    Description: Red Shield Acquisition, LLC resubmits the integrated
Agreement with the designation information required by Order No. 614.
    Filed Date: 05/14/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090515-0106.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 4, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-838-000.
    Applicants: Entegra Power Services LLC.
    Description: Entegra Power Services LLC responds to FERC's 4/22/09
letter providing Gila River's updated market power analysis for
reviewing the application for market-based rates filed on 3/13/09.
    Filed Date: 05/13/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090515-0119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 3, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1118-000.
    Applicants: Sesco Caliso, LLC.
    Description: SESCO CALISO, LLC submits an Application for Market-
based Rate Authority.
    Filed Date: 05/14/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090515-0120.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 4, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1120-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation.
    Description: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation amendments to
update the FERC Form 1 reference in its formula rates for the W-1A
Tariff for full requirements service etc.
    Filed Date: 05/11/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090512-0048.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, June 1, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1124-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits its Request to Terminate the Market Participant Agreement with
Midwest Virtual Power Specialists and Notice Regarding Continuing &
Anticipated Default.
    Filed Date: 05/04/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090513-0246.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, May 26, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1127-000.
    Applicants: Wheelabrator South Broward Inc.
    Description: Petition of Wheelabrator South Broward Inc for Order
accepting market-based rate tariff for filing etc.
    Filed Date: 05/14/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090515-0105.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 4, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1131-000.

    Applicants: Palmco Power CT, LLC.
    Description: Palmco Power CT, LLC submits a Petition for Acceptance
of Initial Rate Schedule, Waivers and Blanket Authority.
    Filed Date: 05/14/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090515-0109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 4, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1132-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power NJ, LLC.
    Description: Palmco Power NJ, LLC submits a Petition for Acceptance
of Initial Rate Schedule, Waivers and Blanket Authority.
    Filed Date: 05/14/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090515-0108.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 4, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1133-000.
    Applicants: Palmco Power PA, LLC.
    Description: Palmco Power PA, LLC submits a Petition for Acceptance
of Initial Rate Schedule, Waivers and Blanket Authority.
    Filed Date: 05/14/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090515-0107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, June 4, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1137-000.
    Applicants: Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Company.
    Description: Trans-Allegheny Interstate Line Co submits Second
Revised Sheet No 314I.12 to FERC Electric Tariff, Sixth Revised Volume
No. 1.
    Filed Date: 05/13/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090515-0111.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 3, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1138-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection LLC.
    Description: PJM Interconnection LLC submits an executed
interconnection service agreement.
    Filed Date: 05/13/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090515-0110.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, June 3, 2009.

    Docket Numbers: ER09-1142-000.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: New York Independent System Operator, Inc submits its
compliance filing, revisions to their Market Administration and Control
Area Services and Open Access transmission Tariff, in compliance with
Order 719.
    Filed Date: 05/15/2009.
    Accession Number: 20090518-0033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, June 12, 2009.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12353 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 130)]
[Notices]
[Page 39234]
[DOCID:fr08jy10-70]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

June 30, 2010.
    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

    Docket Numbers: RP10-888-000.
    Applicants: Northern Border Pipeline Company.
    Description: Northern Border Pipeline Company submits Eighth
Revised Sheet 100 et al to FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume 1, to
be effective 7/26/10.
    Filed Date: 06/25/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100628-0205.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, July 07, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-889-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits tariff filing per 154.403:
Annual Electric Power Cost Tracker Surcharge Filing to be effective 8/
1/2010.
    Filed Date: 06/28/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100628-5158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 12, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-890-000.
    Applicants: Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company.
    Description: Questar Southern Trails Pipeline Company submits
tariff filing per 154.203: Baseline to be effective 6/28/2010.
    Filed Date: 06/28/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100628-5215.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 12, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-891-000.
    Applicants: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners.
    Description: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners submits the Fifty-
Third Revised Sheet 9 et al to FERC Gas Tariff, First Revised Volume 1,
to be effective 7/1/10.
    Filed Date: 06/28/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100629-0107.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 12, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-892-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership.
    Description: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership
submits tariff filing per 154.203: Baseline Filing to be effective 6/
29/2010.
    Filed Date: 06/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100629-5060.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 12, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-893-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Report/Form of Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
under New Docket. Measurement Variance/Fuel Use Factors utilized by
Iroquois during the period January 1, 2010 through June 30, 2010.
    Filed Date: 06/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100629-5067.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 12, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-894-000.
    Applicants: Hardy Storage Company, LLC.
    Description: Hardy Storage Company, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.203: Baseline Filing to be effective 6/29/2010.
    Filed Date: 06/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100629-5077.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 12, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-895-000.
    Applicants: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Trans. LLC.
    Description: Kinder Morgan Interstate Gas Transmission LLC submits
Original Sheet 4G.06 to FERC Gas Tariff, Fourth Revised Volume 1A, to
be effective 7/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 06/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100629-0119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 12, 2010.

    Docket Numbers: RP10-897-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rated Service Agreement--Rock Springs to be
effective 7/1/2010.
    Filed Date: 06/29/2010.
    Accession Number: 20100629-5180.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, July 12, 2010.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-16643 Filed 7-7-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 140 (Tuesday, July 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42538-42539]
[FR Doc No: 2014-17178]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2013-0007]

Maritime Advisory Committee for Occupational Safety and Health
(MACOSH)

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice of MACOSH Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Federal Register notice announces meetings of the full
Committee and the workgroups on August 19 and 20, 2014 in Washington,
DC.

DATES: MACOSH meeting: MACOSH will meet from 9 a.m. until approximately
5 p.m. on August 19 and 20, 2014.
    Submission of comments, requests to speak, and requests for special
accommodation: Submit comments, requests to speak at the full Committee
meeting, and requests for special accommodations for these meetings
(postmarked, sent, or transmitted) by August 1, 2014.

ADDRESSES: The Committee and workgroups will meet at the U.S.
Department of Labor, Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20210, in Conference Rooms C-5521 Room 4 and C-5515
Room 2. Meeting attendees must use the visitor's entrance located at
3rd & C Streets NW.
    Submission of written statements and requests to speak: Submit
comments and requests to speak at the MACOSH meetings, identified by
the docket number for this Federal Register notice (Docket No. OSHA
2013-0007), by one of the following methods:
    Electronically: Submit comments and attachments electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Follow the instructions online for submitting comments.
    Facsimile: If comments, including attachments, are not longer than
10 pages, commenters may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202)
693-1648.
    Regular mail, express mail, hand (courier) delivery, and messenger
service: When using this method, submit a copy of comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2013-0007, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. The
Docket Office accepts deliveries (express mail, hand (courier)
delivery, and messenger service) during the Department of Labor's and
Docket Office's normal business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
    Requests for special accommodations: Submit requests for special
accommodations for MACOSH and its workgroup meetings by hard copy,
telephone, or email to: Ms. Gretta Jameson, OSHA, Office of
Communications, Room N-3647, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register notice (Docket No. OSHA-2013-
0007). Because of security-related procedures, submissions by regular
mail may result in a significant delay in receipt. Please contact the
OSHA Docket Office for information about security procedures for making
submissions by express mail, hand (courier) delivery, and messenger
service.
    OSHA will place comments and requests to speak, including personal
information, in the public docket which may be available online.
Therefore, OSHA cautions interested parties about submitting personal
information such as Social Security numbers and birthdates.
    Docket: To read or download documents in the public docket for this
MACOSH meeting, go to http://www.regulations.gov. All documents in the
public docket are listed in the index; however, some documents (e.g.,
copyrighted material) are not publicly available to read or download
through http://www.regulations.gov. All submissions are available for
inspection and, when permitted, copying at the OSHA Docket Office at
the above address. For information on using http://www.regulations.gov
to make submissions or to access the docket, click on the ``Help'' tab
at the top of the Home page. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for
information about materials not available through that Web site and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate submissions and other
documents in the docket.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For press inquiries: Frank Meilinger,
Director, OSHA Office of Communications, U.S. Department of

Labor, Room N-3647, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information about MACOSH and this meeting: Mrs. Amy
Wangdahl, Director, Office of Maritime and Agriculture, OSHA, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N-3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Copies of this Federal Register notice: Electronic copies of this
Federal Register notice are available at http://www.regulations.gov.
This notice, as well as news releases and other relevant information,
are also available at OSHA's Web page at: http://www.osha.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All MACOSH committee and workgroup meetings
are open to the public. Interested persons may attend the full
Committee and its workgroup meetings at the time and place listed
above. The full Committee agenda will include: An OSHA activities
update; a review of the minutes from the previous meeting; and reports
from each workgroup. The workgroup agendas will include discussions on:
Surface preparation and preservation in shipyards; shipboard
refrigeration systems; pedestal crane safety on commercial fishing
vessels; preventing chassis drivers from jostling in the cab in marine
terminals; the accuracy of declared container weights; baggage handling
in cruise terminal operations; a review of the 2010 International
Maritime Organization annex ``Guidance on Providing Safe Working
Conditions for Securing of Containers on Deck''; and log handling
safety.
    The workgroups, which include the Longshoring workgroup and the
Shipyard workgroup, will meet from 9 a.m. until approximately 5 p.m. on
August 19, 2014 in Conference Rooms C-5521 Room 4 and C-5515 Room 2.
The full Committee will meet from 9 a.m. until approximately 5 p.m. on
August 20, 2014, in Conference Room C-5521 Room 4.
    Public Participation: Any individual attending the MACOSH meeting,
including the workgroup meetings, at the U.S. Department of Labor,
Frances Perkins Building, must use the entrance located at 3rd & C
Streets NW. and pass through Building Security. Attendees must have
valid government-issued photo identification to enter the building.
Please contact Gretta Jameson at<PHONE_NUMBER> (email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for additional information about building
security measures for attending the MACOSH Committee and workgroup
meetings. Interested parties may submit a request to make an oral
presentation to MACOSH by any one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section above. The request must state the amount of time
requested to speak, the interest represented (e.g., organization name),
if any, and a brief outline of the presentation. The MACOSH Chair has
discretion to grant requests to address the full Committee as time
permits.
    Interested parties also may submit written comments, including data
and other information, using any one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section above. OSHA will provide all submissions to MACOSH
members prior to the meeting. Individuals who need special
accommodations to attend the MACOSH meeting should contact Gretta
Jameson as specified above under the heading ``Requests for special
accommodations'' in the ADDRESSES section.

Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, authorized the preparation of this
notice under the authority granted by 29 U.S.C. 655, 656, 5 U.S.C. App.
2, Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912), and 29 CFR part
1912.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on July 16, 2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2014-17178 Filed 7-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P