[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33468-33469]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13464]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Availability for Spaceport Camden Final Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS), Camden County, GA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), Council on Environmental Quality NEPA
implementing regulations, and FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures, the FAA is announcing the availability of the
Spaceport Camden Final EIS.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacey Zee, Environmental Protection
Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue
SW, Suite 325, Washington, DC 20591; phone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is the lead agency. The National
Aeronautics and Space Administration and National Park Service are
cooperating agencies for the Spaceport Camden Final EIS due to their
special expertise and jurisdictions.
    The FAA is evaluating the Camden County Board of Commissioners'
proposal to operate a commercial space launch site called Spaceport
Camden, on the Atlantic seaboard in Camden County, Georgia. Issuing a
Launch Site Operator License is considered a major Federal action
subject to environmental review under NEPA. Under the Proposed Action,
the FAA would issue a Launch Site Operator License to the Camden County
Board of Commissioners. The license would authorize the Camden County
Board of Commissioners to offer Spaceport Camden as a launch site to
vehicle operators to conduct launches of liquid-fueled, small, orbital
vertical launch vehicles at Spaceport Camden.

    The Final EIS evaluated the potential environmental impacts of the
Proposed Action and the No Action Alternative. Under the No Action
Alternative, the FAA would not issue a Launch Site Operator License to
the Camden County Board of Commissioners.
    The FAA published a Draft EIS for public review and comment on
March 16, 2018. The FAA held a public hearing on Wednesday, April 11,
and another on Thursday, April 12, 2018 at Camden County Public Service
Authority Recreation Center Community Room, 1050 Wildcat Drive,
Kingsland, GA 31548. The FAA received over 15,500 public comments on
the Draft EIS (see Appendix A of the Final EIS). All comments received
during the comment period were considered in the preparation of the
Final EIS.
    The Final EIS addresses modifications to the Proposed Action since
the release of the 2018 Draft EIS and includes corresponding updates
across all environmental resource areas. In December 2019, Camden
County notified the FAA that it intended to submit an amended
application for a Launch Site Operator License that would limit
proposed launch operations to small launch vehicles, as opposed to the
medium-large launch vehicles included in its original application and
analyzed by the FAA in the Draft EIS. The County submitted an amended
application on January 15, 2020. The amended application included data
and analyses specific to launches of small launch vehicles. The amended
application omitted booster flybacks, which are not a capability of
small launch vehicles, and reduced the range of potential trajectories
identified in the original application to a single 100 degree
trajectory. The FAA has updated the EIS analyses to focus only on the
small launch capability and parameters described in Camden County's
amended application.
    The FAA has posted the Final EIS on the FAA Office of Commercial
Space Transportation website: https://www.faa.gov/space/environmental/nepa_docs/camden_eis/. In addition, links to the Final EIS were sent to
persons and agencies on the distribution list (see Chapter 9 of the
Final EIS). Printed copies of the Final EIS are available for review at
the following locations:

 Camden County Public Library, 1410 Georgia Highway 40,
Kingsland, GA 31548
 St. Marys Public Library, 100 Herb Bauer Drive, St. Marys, GA
31558
 Brunswick-Glynn County Library, 208 Gloucester Street,
Brunswick, GA 31520
 St. Simons Island Public Library, 530A Beachview Drive, St.
Simons Island, GA 31522

    Issued in Washington, DC.
Daniel P. Murray,
Executive Director, Office of Operational Safety.
[FR Doc. 2021-13464 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52373-52374]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21348]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-65141; File No. SR-CME-2011-01]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Mercantile Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Adopt a New Rule Regarding Liens on Collateral That Relates Solely to
Its Futures Clearing Operations

August 16, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on August 5, 2011, Chicago Mercantile Exchange Inc. (``CME'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change described in Items I and II below, which items
have been prepared primarily by CME. CME filed the proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \3\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(4)(ii)
\4\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(4)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change

    The text of the proposed rule change is below. Italicized text
indicates additions; bracketed text indicates deletions.
* * * * *
    Rule 819. [Reserved] Lien on Collateral.
    Each Clearing Member hereby grants to the Clearing House a first
priority and unencumbered lien, as security for all obligations of such
Clearing Member to the Clearing House, against any property and
collateral deposited with the Clearing House by the Clearing Member
which is the property of the Clearing Member. Clearing Members shall
execute any documents required by CME to create and enforce such lien.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose and basis for the proposed
rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule
change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places
specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has
prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    Current CME Rule 902.F provides that ``[e]ach Clearing Member
hereby grants to the Clearing House a first priority and unencumbered
lien against all memberships required for clearing membership by the
Exchange.'' Other CME rules in Chapters 8 and 9 of the CME rulebook
address the CME Clearing House's security interest in CME clearing
member's guaranty fund and performance bond deposits (perfected by
possession of the collateral), but do not contain the type of express
language as appears in Rule 902.F. In order to more clearly indicate
CME Clearing's security interest in CME clearing member's guaranty fund
and performance bond deposits, CME proposes to adopt new CME Rule 819,
which states as follows:
    Each Clearing Member hereby grants to the Clearing House a first
priority and unencumbered lien, as security for all obligations of such
Clearing Member to the Clearing House, against any property and
collateral deposited with the Clearing House by the Clearing Member
which is the property of the Clearing Member. Clearing Members shall
execute any documents required by CME to create and enforce such lien.
    The proposed rule language mirrors that of CME Rule 8F008 (Lien on
Collateral), in Chapter 8F (Over-the-Counter Derivative Clearing) of
the CME rule book, which states that ``[e]ach OTC Clearing Member
hereby grants to CME a first priority and unencumbered lien against any
cash, securities or other collateral deposited with the Clearing House
by the OTC Clearing Member which is the property of the OTC Clearing
Member. OTC Clearing Members shall execute any documents required by
CME to create and enforce such lien.''
    New proposed Rule 819 only affects the futures clearing operations
of CME. It does not significantly affect any securities clearing
operations of CME or any related rights or obligations of CME clearing
members. As discussed above, current CME Rule 8F008 currently applies
to CME clearing members and is the operative rule covering the subject
matter of proposed Rule 819 with respect to CME's security-based swaps
clearing activities. As such, the proposed rule change effects a change
in an existing service of a registered clearing agency that primarily
affects the futures clearing operations of the clearing agency with
respect to futures that are not security futures and does not
significantly affect any securities clearing operations of the clearing
agency or any related rights or obligations of the clearing agency or
persons using such service.
    CME also submitted a filing to the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission (``CFTC'') regarding proposed Rule 819 pursuant to CFTC
Regulation 40.6 on July 26, 2011 with a proposed effective date of
August 9, 2011 (that is, ten business days after the date of the
submission).

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CME does not believe that the proposed rule change will have any
impact, or impose any burden, on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    CME has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit, comments
regarding this proposed rule change. CME has not received any
unsolicited written comments from interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has been filed pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) \5\ of the Act and paragraph (f)(4)(ii) of Rule 19b-4 \6\
thereunder and will become effective on August 9, 2011,\7\ the same
date CME's corresponding filing with

the CFTC becomes effective. At any time within sixty days of the filing
of such rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Supra note 3.
    \6\ Supra note 4.
    \7\ The Commission notes that the proposed rule change became
effective upon filing under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act. CME's
statement indicates that the proposed rule change, which became
effective on August 5, 2011, will not become operative until August
9, 2011.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
     Electronic comments may be submitted by using the
Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml), or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-CME-2011-01 on the subject line.
     Paper comments should be sent in triplicate to Elizabeth
M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC, 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CME-2011-01. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of CME. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CME-2011-01 and
should be submitted on or before September 12, 2011.

    For the Commission by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-21348 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 102 (Thursday, May 26, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33438-33441]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12352]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2016-6893; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-181-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A318-112 airplanes, A319-111, -112, -115, -132,
and -133 airplanes, A320-214, -232, and -233 airplanes, and A321-211, -
212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a
quality control review on the final assembly line, which determined
that the wrong aluminum alloy was used to manufacture several
structural parts. This proposed AD would require a one-time eddy
current conductivity measurements of certain cabin and cargo
compartment structural parts to determine if an incorrect aluminum
alloy was used, and replacement if necessary. We are proposing this AD
to detect and replace structural parts made of incorrect aluminum
alloy. This condition could result in reduced structural integrity of
the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 11, 2016.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707
Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33 5 61 93
44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.airbus.com.
    You may view this referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 425-
227-1221.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
6893; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Operations office (telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2016-6893;
Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-181-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2015-0218, dated November 3, 2015 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for certain Airbus Model
A318-112, A319-111, -112, -115, -132, and -133, A320-214, -232, and -
233, and A321-211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. The MCAI
states:

    Following an Airbus quality control review on the final assembly
line, it was discovered that wrong aluminum alloy were delivered by
a supplier for several structural parts. The results of the
investigations highlighted that 0.04% of the stock could be impacted
by this wrong material.
    Structural investigations demonstrated the capability to sustain
the static limits loads, and sufficient fatigue life up to a certain
inspection threshold.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could reduce the
structural integrity of the aeroplane.
    To address this potential unsafe condition, Airbus issued
Service Bulletin (SB) A320-53-1298 and SB A320-53-1299 to provide
inspection instructions.
    For the reasons described above, this [EASA] AD requires a one-
time Special Detailed Inspection (SDI) [eddy current conductivity
measurements] of certain cabin and cargo compartment parts for
material identification and, depending on findings, replacement with
serviceable parts.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2016-
6893.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Airbus has issued Service Bulletins A320-53-1298 and A320-53-1299,
both dated February 16, 2015; both including Appendices 01, 02, and 03,
dated February 16, 2015. The service information describes procedures
for a one-time eddy current conductivity measurement of certain cabin
and cargo compartment structural parts to determine if an incorrect
aluminum alloy was used, and replacement of any affected part with a
serviceable part. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of these
same type designs.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD affects 167 airplanes of U.S.
registry.
    We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The average
labor rate is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate
the cost of this proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $14,195, or $85
per product.
    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed
AD.
    According to the manufacturer, some of the costs of this proposed
AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact on
affected individuals. We do not control warranty coverage for affected
individuals. As a result, we have included all available costs in our
cost estimate.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2016-6893; Directorate Identifier 2015-NM-
181-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by July 11, 2016.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes identified in paragraphs
(c)(1) through (c)(4) of this AD, certificated in any category;
manufacturer serial numbers 3586, 3588, 3589, 3590, 3595, 3604,
3608, 3614, 3615, 3620, 3632, 3634, 3638, 3647, 3651, 3657, 3660,
3661, 3663, 3671, 3675, 3680, 3683 through 3687 inclusive, 3689,
3691, 3694, 3700, 3702, 3704, 3705, 3710, 3720, 3727, 3728, 3733,
3735, 3742, 3744, 3746, 3754, 3757, 3759, 3763, 3768, 3770, 3772,
3774, 3775, 3779, 3788, 3790, 3794, 3797, 3799, 3801, 3803, 3808,
3810, 3818, 3822, 3824, 3826 through 4329 inclusive, 4331 through
6051 inclusive, 6053 through 6061 inclusive, 6063 through 6072
inclusive, 6074 through 6100 inclusive, 6102 through 6115 inclusive,
6117 through 6126 inclusive, 6128 through 6136 inclusive, 6138
through 6143 inclusive, 6145 through 6150 inclusive, 6152 through
6159 inclusive, 6161 and 6162.
    (1) Airbus Model A318-112 airplanes.
    (2) Airbus Model A319-111, -112, -115, -132, and -133 airplanes.
    (3) Airbus Model A320-214, -232, and -233 airplanes.
    (4) Airbus Model A321-211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a quality control review of the final
assembly line which determined that the wrong aluminum alloy was
used to manufacture several structural parts. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct structural parts made of incorrect aluminum
alloy. This condition could result in reduced structural integrity
of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) One-Time Measurement

    Within 6 years after the effective date of this AD, but not
exceeding 12 years since the date of issuance of the original
certificate of airworthiness or the date of issuance of the original
export certificate of airworthiness: Do a one-time eddy current
conductivity measurements (with 60kHz and 480kHz) of the cabin and
cargo compartment structural parts identified in the ``Affected P/
N'' column of table 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD to
determine if an incorrect aluminum alloy was used, in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletins
A320-53-1298, dated February 16, 2015, including Appendices 01, 02,
and 03, dated February 16, 2015 (for cabin parts); and A320-53-1299,
dated February 16, 2015, including Appendices 01, 02, and 03, dated
February 16, 2015 (for cargo parts).

  Table 1 to Paragraphs (g) and (h) of This AD--Parts To Be Inspected/
                                Installed
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Acceptable
          Affected P/N              replacement P/N          Area
------------------------------------------------------------------------
D5347120720000..................  D5347120720051....  Cabin.
D5347120720100..................  D5347120720151....  Cabin.
D5347120920000..................  D5347120920051....  Cabin.
D5347120920100..................  D5347120920151....  Cabin.
D5347118820400..................  D5347118820451....  Cabin.
D5347717620000..................  D5347717620051....  Cargo.
D5357020620000..................  D5357020620051....  Cargo.
D5358526421200..................  D5358526421251....  Cargo.
D5358526421400..................  D5358526421400....  Cargo.
D5358526421000..................  D5358526421051....  Cargo.
D5358513120001..................  D5358513120051....  Cargo.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

(h) Replacement

    If during the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
any affected part having a part number (P/N) specified in table 1 to
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD is found to have a measured value
greater than that specified in Figure A-GFAAA, Sheet 02,
``Inspection Flowchart,'' of the applicable service information
identified in paragraph (g) of this AD: Before further flight,
replace with an acceptable replacement part having a P/N specified
in table 1 to paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, in accordance with
the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletins A320-53-
1298, dated February 16, 2015, including Appendices 01, 02, and 03,
dated February 16, 2015 (for cabin parts); and A320-53-1299, dated
February 16, 2015, including Appendices 01, 02, and 03, dated
February 16, 2015 (for cargo parts).

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be
emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA DOA. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): If any service information
contains procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(j) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA AD 2015-0218, dated November 3, 2015, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the Internet
at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2016-6893.

    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone: +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax: +33
5 61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet:
http://www.airbus.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
WA. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 17, 2016.
Dionne Palermo,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-12352 Filed 5-25-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 125 (Thursday, June 30, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 38910-38911]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13843]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0994; Airspace Docket No. 21-AGL-14]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of VOR Federal Airways V-7, V-341, and V-493; in the
Vicinity of Menominee, MI

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal
airways V-7, V-341, and V-493, in the vicinity of Menominee, MI. The
airway amendments are necessary due to the planned decommissioning of
the VOR portion of the Menominee, MI, VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment
(DME) navigational aid (NAVAID). The Menominee VOR is being
decommissioned as part of the FAA's VOR Minimum Operational Network
(VOR MON) program.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, September 8, 2022. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
1 CFR part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11
and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it modifies the airway structure as necessary to preserve
the safe and efficient flow of air traffic within the National Airspace
System.

History

    The FAA published a noticed of proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA-2021-0994 in the Federal Register (86 FR 67377; November 26, 2021),
amending VOR Federal airways V-7, V-341, and V-493 in the vicinity of
Menominee, MI. The proposed amendments were due to the planned
decommissioning of the VOR portion of the Menominee, MI, VOR/DME
NAVAID. The FAA invited interested parties to participate in this
rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal. No
comments were received.
    VOR Federal airways are published in paragraphs 6010(a) of FAA
Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 20, 2021, and effective September 15,
2021, which are incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The VOR
Federal airways listed in

this document will be published subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This action to amends FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This action amends 14 CFR part 71 by amending three VOR Federal
airways, V-7, V-341, and V-493, in the vicinity of Menominee, MI, due
to the planned decommissioning of the VOR portion of the Menominee, MI,
VOR/DME. The airway amendment actions are described below.
    V-7: V-7 extends between the Dolphin, FL, VOR/Tactical Air
Navigation (VORTAC) and the Muscle Shoals, AL, VORTAC; between the
Pocket City, IN, VORTAC and the intersection of the Chicago Heights,
IL, VORTAC 358[deg] radial and the Badger, WI, VOR/DME 117[deg] radial
(PETTY fix); and between the Green Bay, WI, VORTAC and the Sawyer, MI,
VOR/DME. The airspace below 2,000 feet MSL outside the United States is
excluded and the portion outside the United States has no upper limit.
This action removes the airway segment between the Green Bay, WI,
VORTAC and Sawyer, MI, VOR/DME. Additionally, since the airway lies
wholly within the United States, this action removes the 2,000 MSL
exclusionary language and the upper limit language for the airspace
outside the United States. The unaffected portions of the existing
airway remain as charted.
    V-341: V-341 extends between the Cedar Rapids, IA, VOR/DME and the
Houghton, MI, VOR/DME. This action removes the airway segment between
the Green Bay, WI, VORTAC and the Iron Mountain, MI, VOR/DME. The
resulting airway extends between the Cedar Rapids, IA, VOR/DME and the
Green Bay, WI, VORTAC; and between the Iron Mountain, MI, VOR/DME and
the Houghton, MI, VOR/DME.
    V-493: V-493 extends between the Livingston, TN, VOR/DME and the
Appleton, OH, VORTAC; and between the Menominee, MI, VOR/DME and the
Rhinelander, WI, VOR/DME. This action removes the airways segment
between the Menominee, MI, VOR/DME and the Rhinelander, WI, VOR/DME.
The resulting airway extends between the Livingston, TN, VOR/DME and
the Appleton, OH, VORTAC.
    All of the NAVAID radials listed in the VOR Federal airway
descriptions below are unchanged and stated in True degrees.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA determined that this action of amending VOR Federal airways
V-7, V-341, and V-493, due to the planned decommissioning of the VOR
portion of the Menominee VOR/DME NAVAID, qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.) and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR part 1500, and in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures, paragraph 5-6.5a, which categorically excludes from further
environmental impact review rulemaking actions that designate or modify
classes of airspace areas, airways, routes, and reporting points (see
14 CFR part 71, Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E Airspace Areas;
Air Traffic Service Routes; and Reporting Points). As such, this action
is not expected to result in any potentially significant environmental
impacts. In accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding
Extraordinary Circumstances, the FAA reviewed this action for factors
and circumstances in which a normally categorically excluded action may
have a significant environmental impact requiring further analysis.
Accordingly, the FAA determined that no extraordinary circumstances
exist that warrant preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact study.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways.

* * * * *

V-7 [Amended]

    From Dolphin, FL; INT Dolphin 299[deg] and Lee County, FL,
120[deg] radials; Lee County; Lakeland, FL; Cross City, FL;
Seminole, FL; Wiregrass, AL; INT Wiregrass 333[deg] and Montgomery,
AL, 129[deg] radials; Montgomery; Vulcan, AL; to Muscle Shoals, AL.
From Pocket City, IN; INT Pocket City 016[deg] and Terre Haute, IN,
191[deg] radials; Terre Haute; Boiler, IN; Chicago Heights, IL; to
INT Chicago Heights 358[deg] and Badger, WI, 117[deg] radials.
* * * * *

V-341 [Amended]

    From Cedar Rapids, IA; Dubuque, IA; Madison, WI; Oshkosh, WI; to
Green Bay, WI. From Iron Mountain, MI; Sawyer, MI; to Houghton, MI.
* * * * *

V-493 [Amended]

    From Livingston, TN; Lexington, KY; York, KY; INT York 030[deg]
and Appleton, OH, 183[deg] radials; to Appleton.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 23, 2022.
Scott M. Rosenbloom,
Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2022-13843 Filed 6-29-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P