[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 184 (Tuesday, September 23, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 56834]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22545]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension: Form 4, SEC File No. 270-126, OMB Control No. 3235-0287.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Exchange Act'') (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) every person who is directly
or indirectly the beneficial owner of more than 10 percent of any class
of any equity security (other than an exempted security) which
registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78l), or who
is a director or an officer of the issuer of such security
(collectively ``insiders''), must file a statement with the Commission
reporting their ownership. Form 4 is a statement to disclose changes in
an insider's ownership of securities. The information is used for the
purpose of disclosing the equity holdings of insiders of reporting
companies. Approximately 204,054 insiders file Form 4 annually and it
takes approximately 0.5 hours to prepare for a total of 102,027 annual
burden hours.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether this proposed
collections of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden imposed by the collections of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collections of information
on respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comment to Thomas Bayer, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: September 17, 2014.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-22545 Filed 9-22-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 204)]
[Notices]
[Page 65393-65395]
[DOCID:fr22oc10-132]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-63122; File No. SR-BATS-2010-028]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; BATS Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposal To Make Clean Up Changes
by Amending Certain Rules

October 18, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 6, 2010, BATS Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``BATS'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder,\4\ which renders it effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing to amend BATS Rule 2.3 to clarify that a
broker or dealer must be a member of another national securities
exchange or association other than BATS Y-Exchange, Inc. (``BYX'') in
order to become or remain a Member of the Exchange, to remove the text
of Rule 2.4 because the waive-in period for the Exchange has expired,
and to make a technical correction to BATS Rule 14.5. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's Web site at http://
www.batstrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these

statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C
below, of the most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend BATS Rule 2.3 to clarify that a
broker or dealer be a member of another national securities exchange or
association other than or in addition to the Exchange's affiliate, BYX,
in order to become or remain a Member of the Exchange. The Exchange
also proposes to remove the text of BATS Rule 2.4 because the rule has
become obsolete as the period for submission of a waive-in membership
application has expired. Lastly, the Exchange proposes to make a
technical correction to BATS Rule 14.5(c) to replace a reference to
``Commodity-Based Trust Shares'' with ``Currency Trust Shares''.

Amend Rule 2.3 To Reflect Existence of BATS Y-Exchange

    The Exchange requires all of its Members to be a member of at least
one other national securities association or national securities
exchange. The proposed change would make clear that this requirement is
not satisfied simply by joining the Exchange's affiliated exchange,
BYX. Rather, as the proposed language indicates, each Member that is a
registered broker or dealer must be a member of another registered
national securities exchange or association other than or in addition
to BYX.

Deletion of Obsolete Rule--BATS Rule 2.4

    As approved by the Commission as part of the Exchange's Form 1
application, BATS Rules include provisions that permitted current or
former subscribers to the electronic communications network formerly
operated by BATS Trading, Inc. to apply to become a Member of the
Exchange by submitting a ``waive-in application'' within ninety (90)
days of approval of the Form 1 by the Commission. The Commission
approved the Exchange's Form 1 application on August 18, 2008, meaning
that waive-in membership applications must have been received by the
Exchange on or prior to November 16, 2008. Accordingly, BATS Rule 2.4
is obsolete, and thus, the Exchange proposes to delete such rule.

Correct Improper Term in BATS Rule 14.5(c)

    Lastly, the Exchange proposes to correct language in BATS Rule
14.5(c) to replace an incorrect reference to ``Commodity-Based Trust
Shares'' with ``Currency Trust Shares''.
2. Statutory Basis
    The rule change proposed in this submission is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder that
are applicable to a national securities exchange, and, in particular,
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\5\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes that the proposed changes are consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ because they would promote just and equitable
principles of trade, remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism
of, a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change imposes
any burden on competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. However,
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. The Exchange requests that the Commission waive
the 30-day operative delay, as specified in Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\9\
which would make the rule change effective and operative upon filing.
The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest.\10\ Such waiver will result in immediate improvement to the
Exchange's rules by clarifying vague language, removing inoperative
language, and correcting a technical inaccuracy. The Commission
believes such improvements should be implemented immediately, rather
than delayed for 30 days. Additionally, the proposed rule change does
not raise any new regulatory issues. For these reasons, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change as operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \10\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BATS-2010-028 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2010-028. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's

Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with
respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission,
and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change
between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be
withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C.
552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3
p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received
will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-BATS-2010-028 and should be submitted on
or before November 12, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-26677 Filed 10-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: May 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 91)]
[Notices]
[Page 22560-22561]
[DOCID:fr13my09-68]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2004-D-0122] (formerly Docket No. 2004D-0327)

Compliance Guidance for Small Business Entities on Labeling Over-
the-Counter Human Drug Products; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a compliance guidance for small business entities
entitled ``Labeling OTC Human Drug Products; Small Entity Compliance
Guide.'' FDA has prepared this guidance in accordance with the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. It is intended to help
small businesses better understand and comply with the agency's over-
the-counter (OTC) labeling requirements and to prepare new labeling.
This compliance guidance finalizes the draft compliance guidance
published on December 9, 2004.

DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on agency guidances at any
time.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of this compliance
guidance to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. Submit written comments on the compliance guidance to
the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the
compliance guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marina Y. Chang, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, rm. 5418, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-2090.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a compliance guidance for
small business entities entitled ``Labeling OTC Human Drug Products;
Small Entity Compliance Guide.'' FDA has prepared this guidance in
accordance with section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act. This is one of several guidances the agency
has developed to help manufacturers, packers, and distributors
implement the final rule establishing standardized content and format
requirements for the labeling of all OTC drug products. Once finalized,
these guidances supersede all other statements, feedback, and
correspondence provided by the agency on these matters since the
issuance of the final rule.
    In the Federal Register of March 17, 1999 (64 FR 13254), FDA
published a final rule establishing standardized content and format
requirements for the labeling of OTC drug products (21 CFR 201.66).
This regulation is intended to standardize labeling for all OTC drug
products so consumers can easily read and understand OTC drug product
labeling and use these products safely and effectively. The regulation
requires manufacturers to present OTC drug labeling information in a
prescribed order and format. The standardized format requires revision
of all existing labeling and covers all OTC drug and drug-cosmetic
products, whether marketed under a new drug application, abbreviated
new drug application, or OTC drug monograph (or drug product not yet
the subject of a final OTC drug monograph).
    Following issuance of the final rule, the agency received a number
of inquiries from manufacturers seeking guidance on how to present the
labeling information for their OTC drug products using the standardized
content and format requirements. To address these inquiries, FDA
published a notice in the Federal Register of December 9, 2004 (69 FR
71420), announcing the availability of a draft compliance guidance for
small business entities entitled ``Labeling OTC Human Drug Products;
Small Entity Compliance Guide.'' The draft compliance guidance
summarizes the new Drug Facts labeling requirements set forth in Sec.
201.66. The

draft compliance guidance also describes how to list those inactive
ingredients that are different when a finished OTC drug product is
obtained from multiple suppliers.
    The notice invited interested persons to submit comments on the
draft compliance guidance by February 7, 2005. FDA did not receive any
comments in response to the notice, and is announcing the availability
of this final compliance guidance with only editorial revisions to the
draft guidance.
    This compliance guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The compliance guidance
represents the agency's current thinking on how OTC drug product
labeling can be converted to the new OTC Drug Facts format labeling. It
does not create or confer any rights for or on any person and does not
operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative approach may be used
if such approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes
and regulations.

II. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. Received comments may be seen in the
Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm or http://
www.regulations.gov.

    May 4, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-11089 Filed 5-12-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


From:
Tunno, Brett J<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Tuesday, January 17, 2023 2:14 PM
To:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Coke ICR2<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Hardin, Christopher W<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Dzurinko, Mike G<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: [External]-Question Door sizes RE: U. S. Steel - Enclosure 1 Submittal

Yes, that is correct.

Brett Tunno, DrPH, CPH
Environmental Affairs
United States Steel Corporation
Office:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Cell:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

From: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2023 11:05 AM
To: Tunno, Brett J<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Hardin, Christopher W<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Dzurinko, Mike G<EMAIL_ADDRESS>GABRIELLE RAYMOND<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: [External]-Question Door sizes RE: U. S. Steel - Enclosure 1 Submittal

Great. Thank you very much. So Battery C is also tall?

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.

From: Tunno, Brett J<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2023 8:23 AM
To: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Hardin, Christopher W<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Dzurinko, Mike G<EMAIL_ADDRESS>GABRIELLE RAYMOND<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: [External]-Question Door sizes RE: U. S. Steel - Enclosure 1 Submittal

Good morning Dr. Jones,

The NESHAP limits are based on door size, per 40 CFR 63.302(a)(3).  The doors for Batteries subject to the 3.3% limit are not tall doors.  B Battery doors are subject to the 4% limit because they are tall.  Excluding C Battery, B Battery is the only other Battery with tall doors.

Thanks,

Brett Tunno, DrPH, CPH
Environmental Affairs
United States Steel Corporation
Office:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Cell:<PHONE_NUMBER>
Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

From: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2023 6:51 PM
To: Tunno, Brett J<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Hardin, Christopher W<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Dzurinko, Mike G<EMAIL_ADDRESS>GABRIELLE RAYMOND<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: [External]-Question Door sizes RE: U. S. Steel - Enclosure 1 Submittal
Importance: High

Hello Brett  -  We are looking at your September 2022 submission for method 303 results (attached) and had a question. I see that on each page you have the door data columns labelled according to a "NESHAP Limit". We need to know if these % limits (for all batteries except C) are based on door size or a permit limit? We know that the battery C limit of 2% leaking doors is NOT in the NESHAP but is a permit condition. So, to put the question another way, are the doors on batteries with a 3.3% "NESHAP limit "not tall" doors? And, a related question, is Battery B the only battery with (physically) tall doors, hence the 4% NESHAP limit for tall doors?

We would appreciate your help on this matter. Thanks.

Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

Pronouns - She/Her/Hers
Salutation - Dr./Ms.

<< USS-C.Q2. Method 303 Summary.pdf >>


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 66 (Tuesday, April 7, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18616-18617]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07931]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP14-1083-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: eTariff filing per 154.206: Motion to Place Tariff
Record into Effect 4-1-2015 to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5071.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-695-000.
    Applicants: Cameron Interstate Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Cameron Interstate
Pipeline Order No. 801 Compliance Filing to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150326-5074.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/7/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-696-000.
    Applicants: LA Storage, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: LA Storage FERC Order
No. 801 Compliance Filing to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150326-5080.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/7/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-697-000.
    Applicants: Mississippi Hub, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Mississippi Hub Order
No. 801 Compliance Filing to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150326-5082.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/7/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-698-000.
    Applicants: Pine Needle LNG Company, LLC.
    Description: Section 4(d) rate filing per 154.403(d)(2): 2015
Annual Fuel and Electric Power Tracker Filing to be effective 5/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150326-5086.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/7/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-699-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Section 4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Amendment to Neg
Rate Agmt (EOG 34687-27) to be effective 3/26/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150326-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/7/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-700-000.
    Applicants: Elba Express Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Elba Express Company, L.L.C. submits 2015 Annual
Interruptible Revenue Crediting Report.
    Filed Date: 3/26/15.
    Accession Number: 20150326-5181.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/7/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-701-000.
    Applicants: Florida Gas Transmission Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Map Filing in
Compliance with Order No. 801 to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5065.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-702-000.
    Applicants: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Map Filing in
Compliance with Order No. 801 to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5066.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-703-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Map Filing in
Compliance with Order No. 801 to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5069.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-704-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Map Filing in
Compliance with Order No. 801 to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5070.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-705-000.
    Applicants: Sea Robin Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Map Filing in
Compliance with Order No. 801 to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-706-000.
    Applicants: Lake Charles LNG Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Map Filing in
Compliance with Order No. 801 to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-707-000.
    Applicants: Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Maps Filing in
Compliance with Order 801 to be effective 5/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-708-000.
    Applicants: Empire Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Order No. 801 CF (Map
Link) to be effective 5/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-709-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Section 4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Negotiated
Rates--Chevron Apr2015 TEAM2014 releases to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5107.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-710-000.
    Applicants: Northern Border Pipeline Company.
    Description: Section 4(d) rate filing per 154.403(d)(2): Compressor
Usage Surcharge 2015 to be effective 5/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-711-000.
    Applicants: NGO Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: NGO Transmission Order
No. 801 Compliance Filing to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5134.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-712-000.
    Applicants: Paiute Pipeline Company.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: RM14-21 Compliance Map
Filing to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5166.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-713-000.
    Applicants: Bison Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Bison Pipeline LLC submits 2015 Company Use Gas Annual
Report.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5181.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-714-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Section 4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Negotiated
Capacity

Release Agreements--3/27/2015 to be effective 3/27/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5193.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-715-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Section 4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Non-Conforming
Agreement--Woodbridge/CPV to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5241.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-716-000.
    Applicants: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Order No. 801
Compliance Filing--System Map to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5258.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-717-000.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, L.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Order No. 801
Compliance Filing--System Map to be effective 4/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5255.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-718-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Section 4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Update List of
Non-Coforming Service Agreements (Woodbridge/CPV) to be effective 4/1/
2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5310.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-681-001.
    Applicants: MIGC LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.203: Amendment to Docket No.
RP15-681-000 to be effective 4/24/2015.
    Filed Date: 3/27/15.
    Accession Number: 20150327-5336.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/8/15.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: March 30, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
 Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-07931 Filed 4-6-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 87 (Friday, May 4, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19655-19656]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09108]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0126; Airspace Docket No. 18-AAL-6]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Hoonah, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface, at Hoonah Airport, Hoonah, AK,
to accommodate area navigation (RNAV) procedures at the airport. This
action would ensure the safety and management of instrument flight
rules (IFR) operations within the National Airspace System.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 18, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone: 1
(800) 647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2018-0126; Airspace Docket No. 18-AAL-6, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom Clark, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 2200
S 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198-6547; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would establish Class E airspace at Hoonah Airport, Hoonah, AK,
in support of IFR operations at the airport.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (Docket No. FAA-
2018-0126; Airspace Docket No. 18-AAL-6) and be submitted in triplicate
to DOT Docket Operations (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone
number).
    Persons wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments on
this notice must submit with those comments a self-addressed, stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket
No. FAA-2018-0126; Airspace Docket No. 18-AAL-6.'' The postcard will be
date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this notice may be changed in light of
the comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public
contact with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed
in the docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined between 8:00 a.m. and
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal holidays, at the
Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal Aviation
Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service Center,
Operations Support Group, 2200 S 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198-6547.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective
September 15, 2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by establishing a designated stand-alone
Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at
Hoonah Airport, Hoonah, AK, within a 3-mile radius of the airport and
within 3 miles each side of the 077[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the airport 3-mile radius to 8.1 miles east of the
airport. This airspace area would specifically support IFR operations
at Hoonah Airport, and would be unaffected by any proposed changes that
would occur at any other airport.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11B, dated August 3, 2017 and effective September 15,
2017, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

     Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and
effective September 15, 2017, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Hoonah, AK [New]

Hoonah Airport, AK
    (Lat. 58[deg]05'46'' N, long. 135[deg]24'32'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 3-mile radius of the Hoonah Airport and within 3 miles each
side of the airport 077[deg] bearing extending from the airport 3-
mile radius to 8.1 miles east of the airport.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on April 23, 2018.
B.G. Chew,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2018-09108 Filed 5-3-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 162 (Monday, August 22, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52263-52266]
[FR Doc No: 2011-21327]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0744]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation for Marine Events; Mattaponi Madness
Drag Boat Race, Mattaponi River, Wakema, VA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will establish special local regulations
during the Mattaponi Madness Drag

Boat Event, a series of power boat races to be held on the waters of
the Mattaponi River, near Wakema, Virginia. These special local
regulations are necessary to provide for the safety of life on
navigable waters during the events. This action is intended to restrict
vessel traffic during the drag boat races on the Mattaponi River
immediately adjacent to the Rainbow Acres Campground, located in King
and Queen County, near Wakema, Virginia.

DATES: This rule will be effective from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on August 27,
2011. In the case of inclement weather, this regulation will be
effective from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on August 28, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0744 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0744 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail LCDR Christopher A. O'Neal, Waterways
Management Division Chief, Sector Hampton Roads, Coast Guard; telephone
757-668-5580, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because the Coast Guard did not receive the
application for this event in sufficient time to allow for publication
of an NPRM, and any delay encountered in this regulation's effective
date by publishing a NPRM would require either the cancellation of the
event, or require that the event be held without a safety zone. Either
course of action would be contrary to public interest since immediate
action is needed to provide for the safety of life and property on
navigable waters. Additionally, delaying the effective date would be
contrary to the public interest since immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of the event participants, patrol vessels, spectator
craft and other vessels transiting the event area. The potential
dangers posed by drag boat racing, operating in speeds excess of 150
miles per hour, make special local regulations necessary. However, the
Coast Guard will provide advance notifications to users of the effected
waterways via marine information broadcasts, local notice to mariners,
commercial radio stations and area newspapers. In addition, publishing
an NPRM is unnecessary because this event is an annual event which
mariners should be aware of taking place, as it has been published in
the Federal Register since 2009. The Coast Guard has never received any
comments regarding this event.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date would
be contrary to the public interest since immediate action is needed to
ensure the safety of the event participants, patrol vessels, spectator
craft and other vessels transiting the event area. The potential
dangers posed by drag boat racing, operating in speeds excess of 150
miles per hour, make special local regulations necessary. However, the
Coast Guard will provide advance notifications to users of the effected
waterways via marine information broadcasts, local notice to mariners,
commercial radio stations and area newspapers. In addition, publishing
an NPRM is unnecessary because this event is an annual event which
mariners should be aware of taking place, as it has been published in
the Federal Register since 2009. The Coast Guard has never received any
comments regarding this event.

Background and Purpose

    The Mattaponi Volunteer Rescue Squad will be sponsoring a series of
power boat racing events titled the ``Mattaponi Madness Drag Boat
Event.'' The power boat races will be held on the following date:
August 27, 2011, and in the case of inclement weather, the event will
be rescheduled to August 28, 2011. The races will be held on the
Mattaponi River immediately adjacent to the Rainbow Acres Campground in
King and Queen County, Virginia. The power boat races will consist of
approximately 45 vessels conducting high speed straight line runs along
the river and parallel to the shoreline. A fleet of spectator vessels
is expected to gather near the event site to view the competition. To
provide for the safety of participants, spectators and other transiting
vessels, the Coast Guard will temporarily restrict vessel traffic in
the event area during the power boat races.
    During this enforcement period, vessels may not enter the regulated
area unless they receive permission from the Coast Guard Patrol
Commander.

Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing special local regulations on
specified waters of the Mattaponi River, in the vicinity of Wakema,
Virginia. The regulated area includes all waters of Mattaponi River
immediately adjacent to Rainbow Acres Campground in King and Queen
County, Virginia. The regulated area includes a section of the
Mattaponi River approximately three-fourths of a mile long and bounded
in width by each shoreline, bounded to the east by a line that runs
parallel along longitude 076[deg]52'43'' W, near the mouth of Mitchell
Hill Creek, and bounded to the west by a line that runs parallel along
longitude 076[deg]53'41'' W just north of Wakema, Virginia. The effect
of this regulation would be to restrict general navigation in the
regulated area during the drag boat races. This special local
regulation will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on August 27, 2011;
and in the case of inclement weather, this special local regulation
will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on August 28, 2011. Except for
persons or vessels authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no
person or vessel may enter or remain in the regulated area. Non-
participating vessels will be allowed to transit the regulated area
between races, when the Coast Guard Patrol Commander determines it is
safe to do so. This regulation is needed to control vessel traffic
during the event to enhance the safety of participants, spectators and
transiting vessels.
    In addition to notice in the Federal Register, the maritime
community will be provided extensive advance notification via the Local
Notice to Mariners, and marine information broadcasts so mariners can
adjust their plans accordingly.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.

Below we summarize our analyses based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Although this rule prevents traffic from
transiting a portion of certain waterways during specified events, the
effect of this regulation will not be significant due to the limited
duration that the regulated area will be in effect and the extensive
advance notifications that will be made to the maritime community via
marine information broadcasts, local radio stations and area newspapers
so mariners can adjust their plans.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    The rule would affect the following entities, some of which might
be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to
transit or anchor in this section of Mattaponi River during the event
from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on August 27 or from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on August
28, 2011.
    Although this regulation prevents traffic from transiting a portion
of Mattaponi River during the event, this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
for the following reasons. This rule would be in effect for only a
limited period. Vessel traffic will be able to transit the regulated
area between heats if the Coast Guard Patrol Commander deems it is safe
to do so. Before the enforcement period, the Coast Guard will issue
maritime advisories so mariners can adjust their plans accordingly.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not affect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are

technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance,
design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related
management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by
voluntary consensus standards bodies.
    This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(h), of the Instruction. This rule involves implementation of
regulations within 33 CFR part 100 that apply to organized marine
events on the navigable waters of the United States that may have
potential for negative impact on the safety or other interest of
waterway users and shore side activities in the event area. The
category of water activities includes but is not limited to sail boat
regattas, boat parades, power boat racing, swimming events, crew
racing, and sail board racing. Under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of
the Instruction, an environmental analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination will be available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.

    Add temporary Sec.  100.35T05-XXXX to read as follows:

Sec.  100.35T05-XXXX  Special Local Regulation; Mattaponi Madness Drag
Boat Race, Mattaponi River, Wakema, Virginia

    (a) Regulated Area. The regulated area includes all waters of
Mattaponi River immediately adjacent to Rainbow Acres Campground in
King and Queen County, Virginia. The regulated area includes a section
of the Mattaponi River approximately three-fourths of a mile long and
bounded in width by each shoreline, bounded to the east by a line that
runs parallel along longitude 076[deg]52'43'' W, near the mouth of
Mitchell Hill Creek, and bounded to the west by a line that runs
parallel along longitude 076[deg]53'41'' W just north of Wakema,
Virginia. All coordinates reference Datum NAD 1983.
    (b) Definitions. (1) Coast Guard Patrol Commander means a
commissioned, warrant or petty officer of the Coast Guard who has been
designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads.
    (2) Official Patrol means any vessel assigned or approved by
Commander, Coast Guard Sector Hampton Roads with a commissioned,
warrant or petty officer on board and displaying a Coast Guard ensign.
    (c) Special Local Regulations. (1) Except for persons or vessels
authorized by the Coast Guard Patrol Commander, no person or vessel may
enter or remain in the regulated area.
    (2) The operator of any vessel in the regulated area shall:
    (i) Stop the vessel immediately when directed to do so by an
Official Patrol.
    (ii) Proceed as directed by any official patrol.
    (d) Enforcement Period: This regulation will be enforced from 11
a.m. to 6 p.m. on August 27, 2011. In the case of inclement weather,
this regulation will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on August 28,
2011.

    Dated: August 2, 2011.
Mark S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. 2011-21327 Filed 8-19-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 11, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28860-28862]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10129]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2016-0050]

Hours of Service of Drivers: Application for an Exemption From
Cleveland-Cliffs Steel, LLC

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of final disposition; grant of exemption.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its decision to grant Cleveland-Cliffs Steel,
LLC (Cliffs), formerly known as ArcelorMittal Indiana Harbor, LLC,
exemption from the hours of service (HOS) that allows its employee-
drivers with commercial driver's licenses (CDLs) who transport scrap
metal on two trucks between their production and shipping locations on
public roads to work up to 16 hours per day and to return to work with
less than the mandatory 10 consecutive hours off duty. The exemption is
similar to the exemption that allows Cliffs' drivers transporting steel
coils to work the same HOS schedule. Unlike the steel coil exemption,
the scrap metal trucks

comply with the heavy hauler trailer definition, height of rear side
marker lights restrictions, tire loading restrictions, and the coil
securement requirements in the FMCSRs.

DATES: This exemption is effective May 11, 2022 and ending May 11,
2027.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jos[eacute] R. Cestero, Vehicle
and Roadside Operations Division, Office of Carrier, Driver, and
Vehicle Safety, MC-PSV,<PHONE_NUMBER>, Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments submitted to notice requesting public comments on the
exemption application, go to www.regulations.gov at any time or visit
Room W12-140 on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., ET, Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER> before visiting
Docket Operations. The online Federal document management system is
available 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The docket number is listed
at the beginning of this notice.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain parts of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations (FMCSRs). FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption
request in the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must
provide the public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant
to the application, including any safety analyses that have been
conducted. The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public
comment on the request.
    The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the application
and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons receiving
the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the exemption is
granted. The notice must also specify the effective period (up to 5
years) and explain the terms and conditions of the exemption. The
exemption may be renewed (49 CFR 381.300(b)).

Cliffs' Application for Exemption

    Cliffs, formerly known as ArcelorMittal, requests an exemption to
allow its employee-drivers with CDLs who transport scrap metal on two
trucks between their production and shipping locations to work up to 16
hours per day and return to work with less than the mandatory 10
consecutive hours off duty. The request is similar to the exemption
previously granted that allows Cliffs' drivers transporting steel coils
to work the same HOS and travel the same distances and routes between
their production and shipping locations. Unlike the steel coil
exemption, the scrap trucks would comply with the definition of a
``heavy hauler trailer'' in 49 CFR 393.5; the required ``height of rear
side marker lights restrictions'' in 49 CFR 393.11 Table1--Footnote 4;
the ``tire loading restrictions'' in 49 CFR 393.75(f); and the ``coil
securement requirements'' in 49 CFR 393.120.
    Cliffs (USDOT 1313214) operates a steel plant in East Chicago,
Indiana, its principal place of business. Several public roadways run
through the plant area. Scrap metal produced in one portion of the
plant must be transported over two short segments of public highway to
another section of the plant. Both points where the vehicles cross are
controlled intersections, having either traffic lights or a combination
of traffic lights and signs. The first public road the CMVs cross is
Riley Road and it was controlled by a traffic signal in both
directions; however, the City of East Chicago removed the traffic
lights and is in the process of replacing them with four-way stop
signs. The distance traveled is 80 feet. The average number of
crossings at this intersection is 32 per day. The second crossing is at
Dickey Road and 129th Street, which is controlled by a stop sign and
traffic light. The distance traveled here is .2 miles. The trucks cross
129th Street 32 times per day.
    According to Cliffs, the current HOS regulations create problems as
employee-drivers typically work an 8-hour shift plus overtime while
employees in the production and shipping areas work 12-hour shifts.
Employee-drivers must go home under the current arrangement, leaving a
4-hour gap between production and the driver's schedule, creating an
overrun of scrap metal for disposal and/or recycling.
    Cliffs advised that it would ensure that all employee-drivers would
not work more than 16 hours per shift, would receive 8 hours off duty
between shifts, and would not be allowed to drive more than 10 percent
of their total workday.
    Cliffs acknowledged in its application that these scrap metal truck
drivers would remain subject to all of the other applicable Federal
regulations. This includes CDLs, controlled substance and alcohol
testing, inspection, maintenance, and repair of vehicles. A copy of
Cliffs' application for the exemption is available for review in the
docket for this notice.

Comments

    FMCSA published a notice of the application in the Federal Register
on August 26, 2021, requesting public comment (86 FR 47708). The Agency
received comments from five individuals.
    Jeffrey Hill wrote ``We have regulations in place to ensure drivers
are well rested and alert during service hours. The company should not
be granted additional hours. Sixteen hours is way too many hours. These
drivers will be over worked and become fatigued.'' Mathew Hillegas
commented ``This sounds like an accident just looking for place to
happen. There is so much traffic congestion in this area that requires
a driver to be on their A game not half wore out with little chance to
get proper rest.''
    A&A Express, LLC stated, ``They should not be approved for the
waiver. I own and operate a trucking company and drivers need their
rest and sleep. Running those longer hours and with less than a 10-hour
break is too dangerous. Barry Owen wrote ``Companies are pushing
drivers more than ever, the truck drivers are fatigued enough! Now
companies want longer hours for the drivers! As a driver, I say no!''
    Michael Millard stated ``I hope the FMCSA denies the application
for an exception to the HOS submitted by Cleveland-Cliffs Steel, LLC.
The application goes against the HOS and general human needs; whereas,
eight hours off between shifts involves commute time to and from work,
time for personal hygiene and wellness limiting drivers to possibly
less than five hours of sleep between shifts.''

FMCSA Response

    FMCSA ensured that the motor carrier possessed an active USDOT
registration, minimum required levels of insurance, and was not subject
to any ``imminent hazard'' or other out-of-service orders. The Agency
conducted a comprehensive investigation of the safety performance
history of the motor carrier during the

review process. As part of this process, FMCSA reviewed its Motor
Carrier Management Information System safety records, including
inspection and accident reports submitted to FMCSA by State agencies.
    The request is similar to the exemption previously granted that
allows Cliffs' drivers transporting steel coils to work the same HOS
and travel the same distances and routes between their production and
shipping locations. Unlike the steel coil exemption, the scrap trucks
would comply with the definition of a ``heavy hauler trailer'' in 49
CFR 393.5; the required ``height of rear side marker lights
restrictions'' in 49 CFR 393.11 Table 1--Footnote 4; the ``tire loading
restrictions'' in 49 CFR 393.75(f); and the ``coil securement
requirements'' in 49 CFR 393.120. As the Agency stated in the steel
coil exemption, this is somewhat comparable to current HOS regulations
that allow certain ``short-haul'' drivers a 16-hour driving ``window''
once a week (49 CFR 395.1(o)) and other non-CDL short-haul drivers two
16-hour duty periods per week (49 CFR 395.1(e)(2)), provided specified
conditions are met. However, current regulations require a minimum of
10 hours off duty between duty periods.

FMCSA Decision

    The FMCSA has evaluated Cliffs' application for exemption and the
public comments and hereby grants the exemption. The Agency believes
that Cliffs' overall safety performance, as well as other factors
discussed in its application (principally the short distances and low
speeds of its operations on public highways) will enable it to achieve
a level of safety that is equivalent to, or greater than the level of
safety achieved without the exemption (49 CFR 381.305(a)).

Terms and Conditions for the Exemption

1. Period of the Exemption

    The exemption is effective for a 5-year period, beginning May 11,
2022 and ending May 11, 2027.

2. Extent of the Exemption

    The exemption from the requirements of 49 CFR part 395 is
restricted to Cliffs' scrap truck drivers. Drivers utilizing the
exemption may work up to 16 consecutive hours in a duty period and
return to work with a minimum of at least 8 hours off duty when
necessary.
    The CMVs must cross only on Riley Road, where they travel 80 feet
and Dickey Road and 129th Street where they travel .2 miles to move
scrap metal from one part of the plant to another section of the plant.
All drivers must have CDLs, and drivers and vehicles must comply with
all other applicable provisions of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations.

3. Preemption

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31315(d), during the period this
exemption is in effect, no State shall enforce any law or regulation
that conflicts with or is inconsistent with these exemptions with
respect to a firm or person operating under this exemption.

4. Notification to FMCSA

    Cliffs must notify FMCSA within 5 business days of any accident (as
defined in 49 CFR 390.5), involving any of the motor carrier's CMVs
operating under the terms of this exemption. The notification must be
emailed to [email protected] and include the following information:
    a. Exemption Identifier: ``Cleveland-Cliffs Steel, LLC'';
    b. Name and USDOT number of the motor carrier;
    c. Date of the accident;
    d. City or town, and State, in which the accident occurred, or
which is closest to the scene of the accident;
    e. Driver's name and driver's license number;
    f. Vehicle number and State license number;
    g. Number of individuals suffering physical injury;
    h. Number of fatalities;
    i. The police-reported cause of the accident;
    j. Whether the driver was cited for violation of any traffic laws,
or motor carrier safety regulations; and
    k. The total driving time and the total on-duty time of the CMV
driver at the time of the accident.

5. Termination

    FMCSA does not believe the motor carrier, the drivers, and CMVs
covered by the exemption will experience any deterioration of their
safety record. However, should this occur, FMCSA will take all steps
necessary to protect the public interest, including revocation of the
exemption. FMCSA will immediately revoke the exemption for failure to
comply with its terms and conditions.

Robin Hutcheson,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2022-10129 Filed 5-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P