[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 50 (Friday, March 14, 2014)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 14460]
[FR Doc No: 2014-05525]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2013-0599; FRL-9906-91-Region-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; California;
San Francisco Bay Area and Chico Nonattainment Areas; Fine Particulate
Matter Emission Inventories

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the California State Implementation Plan (SIP)
concerning emission inventories for the 2006 24-hour fine particle
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for the San Francisco Bay
Area and Chico PM2.5 nonattainment areas. We are approving
these emissions inventories under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by April 14, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2013-0599, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
    2. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or email.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send email directly to EPA, your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
    Docket: Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA
Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California 94105-3901.
While all documents in the docket are listed at www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps), and some may not be
publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the hard
copy materials, please schedule an appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972-
3848<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the submitted
PM2.5 emission inventories for the San Francisco Bay Area
and Chico nonattainment areas. In the Rules and Regulations section of
this Federal Register, we are approving submitted emission inventories
in a direct final action without prior proposal because we believe
these SIP revisions are not controversial. If we receive adverse
comments, however, we will publish a timely withdrawal of the direct
final rule and address the comments in subsequent action based on this
proposed rule. Please note that if we receive adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those
provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: January 30, 2014.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2014-05525 Filed 3-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10166-10167]
[FR Doc No: 2013-03330]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0036; FRL-9376-6]

Access Interpreting; Transfer of Data

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces that pesticide related information
submitted to EPA's Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) pursuant to the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA), including information
that may have been claimed as Confidential Business Information (CBI)
by the submitter, will be transferred to Access Interpreting in
accordance with the CBI regulations. Access Interpreting has been
awarded a contract to perform work for OPP, and access to this
information will enable Access Interpreting to fulfill the obligations
of the contract.

DATES: Access Interpreting will be given access to this information on
or before February 19, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: MaryC Simmons, Information Technology
and Resources Management Division (7502P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>: email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action applies to the public in general. As such, the Agency
has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be
affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How can I get copies of this document and other related information?

    EPA has established a docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0036. Publicly available
docket materials are available either in the electronic docket http://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP Docket is (703) 305-
5805. Please review the visitor instructions and additional information
about the docket available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

II. Contractor Requirements

    Under Contract No. EP10H000109, this contract is to provide the
Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Human Resources (OHR) with
Sign Language interpreting services. The contractor shall provide
professional interpreters who shall make every effort to arrive at
scheduled assignments 15 minutes prior to the start of the assignment,
concurrent with general interpreting standards. Contract interpreters
whom the Contractor sends must have a cell phone or text pager that
will allow them to get instant messages for quick communication of last
minute changes.
    The work will be performed in a space to be designated by EPA,
primarily at EPA Headquarters and other Washington, DC area EPA
facilities. Occasional travel will be involved. The sign language
personnel will report to the location specified by the EPA Headquarters
Interpreting Coordinator, also identified as the Project Officer under
this contract. There will be some requests for interpreters in
different areas of the United States. The contractor must have the
ability to procure services in different locations throughout the
country. The Contractor must primarily serve Deaf and hard of hearing
persons as a major function of their business and be stationed in the
Washington, DC metropolitan area.
    This contract involves no subcontractors.
    OPP has determined that the contract described in this document
involves work that is being conducted in connection with FIFRA, in that
pesticide chemicals will be the subject of certain evaluations to be
made under this contract. These evaluations may be used in subsequent
regulatory decisions under FIFRA.
    Some of this information may be entitled to confidential treatment.
The information has been submitted to EPA under FIFRA sections 3, 4, 6,
and 7 and under FFDCA sections 408 and 409.
    In accordance with the requirements of 40 CFR 2.307(h)(3), the
contract with Access Interpreting prohibits use of the information for
any purpose not specified in this contract; prohibits disclosure of the
information to a third party without prior written approval from the
Agency; and requires that each official and employee of the contractor
sign an agreement to protect the information from unauthorized release
and to handle it in accordance with the FIFRA Information Security
Manual. In addition, Access Interpreting is required to submit for EPA
approval a security

plan under which any CBI will be secured and protected against
unauthorized release or compromise. No information will be provided to
Access Interpreting until the requirements in this document have been
fully satisfied. Records of information provided to Access Interpreting
will be maintained by EPA Project Officers for this contract. All
information supplied to Access Interpreting by EPA for use in
connection with this contract will be returned to EPA when Access
Interpreting has completed its work.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Business and industry, Government
contract, Government property, Security measures.

    Dated: January 30, 2013.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Information Technology and Resources Management Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013-03330 Filed 2-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: December 22, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 244)]
[Notices]
[Page 68095-68097]
[DOCID:fr22de09-83]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of denials.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces its denial of 92 applications from individuals
who requested an exemption from the Federal vision standard applicable
to interstate truck and bus drivers and the reasons for the denials.
FMCSA has statutory authority to exempt individuals from the vision
requirement if the exemptions granted will not compromise safety. The
Agency has concluded that granting these exemptions does not provide a
level of safety that will be equivalent to, or greater than, the level
of safety maintained without the exemptions for these commercial motor
vehicle (CMV) drivers.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Director Medical
Programs,<PHONE_NUMBER>, U.S. Department of Transportation, FMCSA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64-224, Washington, DC 20590-0001. Office
hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the Federal vision standard for a renewable 2-year period if it
finds ``such an exemption would likely achieve a level of safety that
is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be achieved
absent such an exemption.'' The procedures for requesting an exemption
are set out in 49 CFR part 381.
    Accordingly, FMCSA evaluated 92 individual exemption requests on
their merits and made a determination that these applicants do not
satisfy the criteria eligibility or meet the terms and conditions of
the Federal exemption program. Each applicant has, prior to this
notice, received a letter of final disposition on his/her exemption
request. Those decision letters fully outlined the basis for the denial
and constitute final Agency action. The list published today summarizes
the Agency's recent denials as required under 49 U.S.C. 31315(b)(4) by
periodically publishing names and reasons for denials.
    The following 15 applicants lacked sufficient driving experience
during the 3-year period prior to the date of their application:

Jeffrey L. Allen
Malcom Celestine
Dennis R. Davidson
Michael S. Dawson
Craig D. Delph
William J. Gibson
Dennis H. Heller
Cierra L. Jones
Roberto Lozano
Stephen V. May
Bernard Sippin
Mark L. St. Clair
Vince A. Thompson
Gregory J. Tipton
Floyd L. Williams

    The following 10 applicants did not have any experience operating a
CMV:

Earl Bellfield, Jr.
Terisa Billings
Jeffrey T. Christman
Diane E. Cuttler
William Goodman, II
Randy Hoffman
Caroline W. Ngere
Jose M. Orosco
Wendell D. Risser
Gerald Simms

    The following 21 applicants did not have 3 years of experience
driving a CMV on public highways with the vision deficiency:

Don R. Alexander
Kenneth Bilby
Quinton L. Bobo, Sr.
Steven Bruehling
Alberto Cano
Christopher W. Craine
Mark W. Crocker
Tracy Y. Davis
Robin L. Dothager
Carl Fenner
Kent Gilkerson
Shawn M. Gregory
Perry J. Harris
Johnny L. Johnson
Kevin J. Keegan
Ernest K. Kerezi
Edward F. Lindey, Jr.
Shawna M. Morris
Wesley C. Randall
Talmadge O. Rutherford
Gary Zoffada

    The following 8 applicants did not have 3 years of recent
experience driving a CMV with the vision deficiency:

Barry Barker
Jack Evans
Michael R. Garcia
Ivan M. Hanna
Keith D. Kleen
Tom E. Slavens
Carol P. Terry
Douglas W. Turner

    The following 13 applicants did not have sufficient driving
experience over the past 3 years under normal highway operating
conditions:

Charles L. Alsager, Jr.
Roger J. Boggs
Terry Y. Braxton
Nathan C. Clements
Rogelio Garcia
Brian E. Goodwin
Jimmy L. Herron
Darold D. Johnston
Frederick A. Kolmorgen
David J. Overweg
Rick L. Robins
Robert A. Rose
Jesus R. Torres

    One applicant, Thomas L. Matheny, had more than 2 commercial motor
vehicle violations during the 3-year review period and/or application
process. Each applicant is only allowed 2 moving citations.
    One applicant, Michael A. Terry, has other medical conditions
making him unqualified under Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations.
All applicants must meet all other physical qualifications standards in
49 CFR 391.41(b)(1-13).
    The following 4 applicants had commercial driver's license
suspensions during the 3-year review period in relation to a moving
violation. Applicants do not qualify for an exemption with a suspension
during the 3-year period:

John P. Crawford
Randy Fielder
Brandon L. McBride, Sr.
Jason L. Meeks

    Two applicants, Leland P. Armstrong and Bobbie Evans, did not hold
a license which allowed operation of vehicles over 10,000 pounds for
all or part of the 3-year period.
    One applicant, Jerry W. Thompkins, did not have an Optometrist/
Ophthalmologist willing to state that he is able to operate a
commercial vehicle from a vision standpoint.
    The following 10 applicants were denied for miscellaneous/multiple
reasons:

Macario Escarcega
Steven M. Guy
Jim Kaiser
Richard G. Lyon
Teresa L. Miller
Floyd D. Prater
Jaime Roman
Joseph M. Taylor
Michael J. Whitesell
Richard L. Wilson

    Two applicants, Roger B. Doolin and Mark P. Huemann, were
disqualified because their vision was not stable for the entire three-
year review period.
    Finally, the following 4 applicants met the current federal vision
standards. Exemptions are not required for applicants that meet the
current regulations for vision:

Patricia Duncan
Michael A. Sherbourne
Robert J. Snowden, Jr.
Michael T. Thompson

    Issued on: December 15, 2009.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9-30343 Filed 12-21-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register: April 5, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 65)]
[Notices]
[Page 16783-16784]
[DOCID:fr05ap07-67]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Application for Amendment of License and Soliciting
Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

March 30, 2007.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Request for Temporary Variance of Minimum
Flow Requirement.
    b. Project No.: 618-137.
    c. Date Filed: March 30, 2007.
    d. Applicant: Alabama Power Company.
    e. Name of Project: Jordan Dam.
    f. Location: On the Coosa River, in Elmore, Chilton, and Coosa
Counties, Alabama.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. Sec. Sec.  791a-
825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Alan L. Peeples, Alabama Power Company, 600
N.18th Street, P.O. Box 2641, Birmingham, AL 35291,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Peter Yarrington<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(202)
502-6129.
    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene and protests:
April 16, 2007.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy
of any motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative
of the Applicant specified in the particular application.
    k. Description of Request: The Alabama Power Company (APC) is
requesting a temporary variance of the minimum flow requirement of the
project license. Because of persistent drought conditions in the
project area and the need to conserve water, APC requests that it be
allowed to release from the Jordan Dam Project 3,000 cubic feet per
second (cfs) April 1-June 15, 2007, instead of the 4,000 cfs required
in the project license. Further, APC proposes to suspend the pulse flow
release of 8,000 cfs during this period. Beginning June 16, 2007, the
APC would return to flow release requirements specified in the license.
Included in APC's request were concurrences received from the state and
federal resource agencies.
    l. Location of the Application: The filing is available for
inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public Reference Room,
located at 888 First Street, NE, Room 2A, Washington, DC 20426 or by
calling<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may
also be viewed on the

Commission's Web site at http://ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link.

Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket
number field to access the document. You may also register online at
http://www.ferc.gov/docsfiling/esubscription.asp to be notified vial e-

mail or new filings and issuances related to this or other pending
projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is

also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions to Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Any filings must bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable,
and the Project Number of the particular application to which the
filing refers.
    p. Agency Comments: Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
    q. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(I)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov

under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-6327 Filed 4-4-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 86 (Thursday, May 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 19578]
[FR Doc No: 2018-09345]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 33088]

Notice of Applications for Deregistration Under Section 8(f) of
the Investment Company Act of 1940

April 27, 2018.
    The following is a notice of applications for deregistration under
section 8(f) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 for the month of
April 2018. A copy of each application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. An order granting each
application will be issued unless the SEC orders a hearing.
    Interested persons may request a hearing on any application by
writing to the SEC's Secretary at the address below and serving the
relevant applicant with a copy of the request, personally or by mail.
Hearing requests should be received by the SEC by 5:30 p.m. on May 22,
2018, and should be accompanied by proof of service on applicants, in
the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the
desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason for the request,
and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing
may request notification by writing to the Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: The Commission: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Shawn Davis, Branch Chief, at (202)
551-6413 or Chief Counsel's Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>; SEC, Division of
Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549-8010.

PNC Advantage Funds [File No. 811-07850]

    Summary: Applicant seeks an order declaring that it has ceased to
be an investment company. The applicant has transferred its assets to
PNC Treasury Plus Money Market Fund, a series of PNC Funds, and, on
March 1, 2018, made a final distribution to its shareholders based on
net asset value. Expenses of approximately $77,886.98 incurred in
connection with the reorganization were paid by the investment adviser
of the applicant and of the acquiring fund.
    Filing Dates: The application was filed on April 10, 2018, and
amended on April 25, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: One East Pratt Street, 5th Floor, Baltimore,
Maryland 21202.

Deutsche High Income Opportunities Fund, Inc. [File No. 811-21949]

    Summary: Applicant, a closed-end investment company, seeks an order
declaring that it has ceased to be an investment company. On March 16,
2018, applicant made a liquidating distribution to its shareholders,
based on net asset value. Expenses of $13,157 incurred in connection
with the liquidation were paid by the applicant.
    Filing Date: The application was filed on April 24, 2018.
    Applicant's Address: 345 Park Avenue, New York, New York 10154.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
pursuant to delegated authority.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-09345 Filed 5-2-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 152 (Tuesday, August 7, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 46994-46995]
[FR Doc No: 2012-19223]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 67

[Docket ID FEMA-2011-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1178]

Proposed Flood Elevation Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Proposed rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On February 16, 2011, FEMA published in the Federal Register a
proposed rule that contained an erroneous table. This notice provides
corrections to that table, to be used in lieu of the information
published. The table provided here represents the flooding sources,
location of referenced elevations, effective and modified elevations,
and communities affected for Bolivar County, Mississippi, and
Incorporated Areas. Specifically, it addresses the following flooding
sources: Jones Bayou, Mississippi River, and Porter Bayou.

DATES: Comments are to be submitted on or before November 5, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-
1178, to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) publishes proposed determinations of Base (1% annual-chance)
Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified BFEs for communities participating
in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), in accordance with
section 110 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4104, and 44 CFR 67.4(a).
    These proposed BFEs and modified BFEs, together with the floodplain
management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are minimum requirements.
They should not be construed to mean that

the community must change any existing ordinances that are more
stringent in their floodplain management requirements. The community
may at any time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to
policies established by other Federal, State, or regional entities.
These proposed elevations are used to meet the floodplain management
requirements of the NFIP and also are used to calculate the appropriate
flood insurance premium rates for new buildings built after these
elevations are made final, and for the contents in those buildings.

Correction

    In the proposed rule published at 76 FR 8965 in the February 16,
2011, issue of the Federal Register, FEMA published a table under the
authority of 44 CFR 67.4. The table, entitled ``Bolivar County,
Mississippi, and Incorporated Areas'' addressed the following flooding
sources: Jones Bayou, Mississippi River, and Porter Bayou. That table
contained inaccurate information as to the location of referenced
elevation, effective and modified elevation in feet, and/or communities
affected for Jones Bayou. In this notice, FEMA is publishing a table
containing the accurate information, to address these prior errors. The
information provided below should be used in lieu of that previously
published.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                  *Elevation in feet
                                                                 (NGVD) +Elevation in
                                                                  feet (NAVD) Depth in feet above
         Flooding source(s)            Location of referenced   ground [caret]Elevation    Communities affected
                                             elevation              in meters (MSL)

                                                              --------------------------
                                                                Effective     Modified
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                               Bolivar County, Mississippi, and Incorporated Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jones Bayou.........................  Approximately 0.5 mile          +134         +135  City of Cleveland,
                                       downstream of Tower                                Unincorporated Areas
                                       Road.                                              of Bolivar County.
                                      Approximately 1,146             +137         +138
                                       feet upstream of West
                                       Rosemary Road.
Mississippi River...................  Approximately 5.5 miles         None         +161  City of Rosedale.
                                       upstream of the
                                       Arkansas River
                                       confluence.
                                      Approximately 8.1 miles         None         +162
                                       upstream of the
                                       Arkansas River
                                       confluence.
Porter Bayou........................  Approximately 0.8 mile          None         +127  City of Shaw.
                                       downstream of State
                                       Route 448.
                                      Approximately 0.7 mile          None         +127
                                       downstream of State
                                       Route 448.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* National Geodetic Vertical Datum.
+ North American Vertical Datum.
 Depth in feet above ground.
[caret] Mean Sea Level, rounded to the nearest 0.1 meter.
** BFEs to be changed include the listed downstream and upstream BFEs, and include BFEs located on the stream
 reach between the referenced locations above. Please refer to the revised Flood Insurance Rate Map located at
 the community map repository (see below) for exact locations of all BFEs to be changed.

Send comments to Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation
 Administration, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472.

                                                    ADDRESSES
City of Cleveland
Maps are available for inspection at the Public Works Department, 1089 Old Highway 61 North, Cleveland, MS
 38732.

City of Rosedale
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 304 Court Street, Rosedale, MS 38769.

City of Shaw
Maps are available for inspection at City Hall, 101 Faison Street, Shaw, MS 38773.

                                     Unincorporated Areas of Bolivar County
Maps are available for inspection at the Bolivar County Administrator Office, 200 South Court Street, Cleveland,
 MS 38732.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Dated: July 18, 2012.
Sandra K. Knight,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2012-19223 Filed 8-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 25, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 38093]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15139]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

First Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 228--Minimum Operational
Performance Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of RTCA Special Committee 228--Minimum Operational
Performance Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of a
meeting of RTCA Special Committee 228--Minimum Operational Performance
Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems.

DATES: The meeting will be held July 30, 2013, from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA, 1150 18th Street NW.,
Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>
or<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a) (2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. No. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of RTCA Special Committee 228--Minimum
Operational Performance Standards for Unmanned Aircraft Systems. The
agenda will include the following:

Wednesday, July 30

 Welcome and Introductions.
 Agenda Overview.
 RTCA Overview.
    [cir] Background on RTCA, MOPS, and Process.
 Review of RTCA PMC UAS Standards Ad Hoc Committee Activity.
 SC-228 Scope and Terms of Reference.
 SC-228 Structure and Organization of Work.
    [cir] Working Group 1--Detect and Avoid (DAA)
    [cir] Working Group 2--Command and Control (C2)
 Other Business
 Date and Place of Next Meeting.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on June 6, 2013.
Paige L. Williams,
Management Analyst, Business Operations Group, ANG-A12, Federal
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-15139 Filed 6-24-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29768-29770]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11339]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket Number USCG-2016-0276]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Lake of the Ozarks, Lakeside, MO

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a special local regulation for
certain waters of the Lake of the Ozarks. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety of life on these navigable waters near Lakeside,
MO, during a powerboat race on June 4, 2016. This regulation designates
prohibited areas for the race course and associated safety buffer,
spectator areas, and location for vessels to transit during the race at
no wake speeds. Deviation from the established special local regulation
must be authorized by the Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River
or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on June 4, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2016-0276 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email LCDR Sean Peterson, Chief of Prevention, U.S. Coast
Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On March 16, 2016, the Lake Race Steering Committee notified the
Coast Guard that it will be hosting a powerboat race from 9 a.m. until
6 p.m. on June 4, 2016. In response, on April 20, 2016, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled Special Local
Regulation; Lake of the Ozarks, Lakeside, MO (81 FR 23223). There we
stated why we issued the NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed
regulatory action related to this powerboat race. During the comment
period that ended May 5, 2016, we received no comments.
    We are issuing this rule, and under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for making it effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal Register. On March 16, 2016, the
Coast Guard was notified of the event being held and an NPRM with a 15
day comment period was published on April 20, 2016. Though we are not
providing a full 30 day notice period, the Coast Guard did provide
notice and opportunity to comment through the NPRM process and is now
providing less than 30 days notice before the final rule goes into
effect on June 4, 2016. It is impracticable to provide a full 30-days
notice because this rule must be effective June 4, 2016.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 33 U.S.C.
1233. The Captain of the Port (COTP) Upper Mississippi River has
determined that potential hazards associated with the powerboat race
are a safety concern. The purpose of this rule is to ensure safety of
vessels and the navigable waters in the special local regulation
before, during, and after the scheduled event.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published April
20, 2016. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from
the proposed rule in the NPRM. This rule establishes a special local
regulation from 9 a.m. until 6 p.m. on June 4, 2016, designating the
race course and location of spectator areas. Vessels transiting near
the course will be restricted to transiting at the slowest safe speed.
This special local regulation covers navigable waters on the Lake of
the Ozarks Osage Branch between miles 0 and 4. The Coast Guard has also
posted a map depicting the location and restricted areas for this
special local regulation in the docket. Six anchorage areas for
spectators are designated and are also shown on the map and labeled as
A through F. This map may be viewed as indicated under the ADDRESSES
section. The duration of the regulation is intended to ensure the
safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after
the power boat race, scheduled from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. No vessel or
person will be permitted to deviate from the special local regulation
without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive Orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive Orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This rule has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, it has not been reviewed

by the Office of Management and Budget.
    This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the special local regulation. Vessel traffic
will be able to safely transit around the race course and spectators
will have designated locations to view the race. Moreover, the Coast
Guard is including event information in the Local Notice to Mariners,
and the rule allows vessels to seek permission to deviate from the
regulation.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule involves a special local regulation designating the race course,
location of spectator areas, and location for vessels to transit during
the race at slowest safe speed. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph 34(h) of Figure 2-1 of the Commandant
Instruction. An environmental analysis checklist supporting this
determination and a Categorical Exclusion Determination are available
in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--REGATTAS AND MARINE PARADES

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.T08-0276 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.T08-0276  Special Local Regulation; Lake of the Ozarks;
Lakeside, MO.

    (a) Location. The following areas are regulated areas:
    (1) Lake of the Ozarks Osage Branch between miles 0 and 4; the
Bagnell Dam and Birdsong Hollow Cove, covering the entire width of the
branch. Access to the race course and associated safety buffer area
will be prohibited to authorized vessels only. The safety buffer area
for the course will be marked with blue buoy markers. Vessels
transiting outside of the safety buffer area shall proceed at no wake
speed. See attached map for additional information on location.
    (2) Six designated areas will be available for spectators for the
duration of the races. The designated anchorage areas will be marked
with blue and yellow buoy marker. They are labeled A-F on the attached
map. The anchorage areas are located a minimum of 100 feet outside the
race course safety buffer area marked with blue buoy

markers. The six anchorages are located in the following areas: Branch
Rd Point; Emerald Ln Point; Lotell Hollow Cove; McCoy Branch Cove; west
of Duck Head Point; and Jennings Branch Cove. In addition to the listed
designated anchorages, vessels may also anchor inside the protective
coves.
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Upper Mississippi River in the enforcement of the
regulation.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general regulations in Sec.  100.35,
deviation from the regulations described in paragraph (a) of this
section is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP Upper Mississippi
River or designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to deviate from the regulation, contact the
COTP or the COTP's designated representative via VHF-FM ch 16 or by
calling Sector Upper Mississippi River at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 9 a.m.
to 6 p.m. on June 4, 2016.

    Dated: May 6, 2016.
M.L. Malloy,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Upper Mississippi
River.
[FR Doc. 2016-11339 Filed 5-12-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 11, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63637-63638]
[FR Doc No: 2018-26729]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2014-0034; FRL-9986-37-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Kraft Pulp Mills (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), NSPS for Kraft Pulp Mills (EPA
ICR No. 1055.12, OMB Control No. 2060-0021), to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with
the Paperwork Reduction Act. This is a proposed extension of the ICR,
which is currently approved through December 31, 2018. Public comments
were previously requested, via the Federal Register, on June 29, 2017
during a 60-day comment period. This notice allows for an additional 30
days for public comments. A fuller description of the ICR is given
below, including its estimated burden and cost to the public. An agency
may neither conduct nor sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before January 10,
2019.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2014-0034, to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
(202) 564-0050; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that the EPA will be collecting, are available
in the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov, or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) for Kraft
Pulp Mills apply to the following facilities at kraft pulp mills:
Recovery furnaces, smelt dissolving tanks, lime kilns, digester
systems, brown stock washer systems, black liquor oxidation systems,
multiple effect evaporator systems and condensate stripper systems that
were constructed, modified or reconstructed after the date of proposal.
In pulp mills where kraft pulping is combined with neutral sulfite
semi-chemical pulping, the provisions of this Subpart are applicable
when any portion of the material charged to an affected facility is
produced by the kraft pulping operation. Facilities may be exempt from
the total reduced sulfur (TRS) standard if the facility can demonstrate
that TRS emissions from a new, modified, or reconstructed brown

stock washer can be neither technically nor economically feasible to
control.
    In general, all NSPS standards require initial notifications,
performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the
affected facilities. They are also required to maintain records of the
occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the
operation of an affected facility, or any period during which the
monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and
records are essential in determining compliance with 40 CFR part 60,
subpart BB.
    Form numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Kraft pulp mills.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart BB).
    Estimated number of respondents: 97 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 13,900 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $5,020,000 (per year), which includes
$3,510,000 in annualized capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance
costs.
    Changes in the estimates: There is an adjustment decrease in the
estimated burden and cost as currently identified in the OMB Inventory
of Approved Burdens. The decrease is not due to any program changes.
The change in burden is due to an industry decline since the last ICR
renewal, resulting in a decrease in the number of respondent subject to
the standard.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2018-26729 Filed 12-10-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P