arrangements for testing and reporting of test results. We solicit
comments on the timeframe for compliance and the ability of facilities
to comply within this timeframe.
    Our experience with similar industries that are required to convert
reporting mechanisms, install necessary hardware and software, become
familiar with the process of submitting performance test results
electronically through the EPA's CEDRI, test these new electronic
submission capabilities, reliably employ electronic reporting, and
convert logistics of reporting processes to different time-reporting
parameters, shows that a time period of a minimum of 90 days, and more
typically, 180 days, is generally necessary to successfully complete
these changes. Our experience with similar industries further shows
that this sort of regulated facility generally requires a time period
of 180 days to read and understand the amended rule requirements;
evaluate their operations to ensure that they can meet the standards
during periods of startup and shutdown as defined in the rule and make
any necessary adjustments; adjust parameter monitoring and recording
systems to accommodate revisions; and update their operations to
reflect the revised requirements. The EPA recognizes the confusion that
multiple different compliance dates for individual requirements would
create and the additional burden such an assortment of dates would
impose. From our assessment of the timeframe needed for compliance with
the entirety of the revised requirements excluding the mercury
requirements, the EPA considers a period of 180 days to be the most
expeditious compliance period practicable, and, thus, is proposing that
existing affected sources be in compliance with all of this
regulation's revised requirements within 180 days of the regulation's
effective date.

V. Summary of Cost, Environmental, and Economic Impacts

A. What are the affected sources?

    These proposed amendments to the Integrated Iron and Steel
Manufacturing NESHAP include rule updates that address electronic
reporting requirements and changes in policies regarding SSM that
affect all integrated iron and steel manufacturing facilities. The
proposed requirement to purchase scrap from scrap providers who certify
they participate in the NVMSRP or a similar approved program or use
scrap not likely to contain mercury would affect any facility that uses
post-consumer steel scrap in their BOPFs, potentially all integrated
iron and steel manufacturing facilities.

B. What are the air quality impacts?

    We are proposing scrap selection requirements to control and reduce
mercury emissions. Air quality is expected to improve as a result of
the proposed amendments in proportion to the number of facilities that
are not currently purchasing scrap from providers who participate in
the NVMSRP or another approved program, or who use scrap not likely to
contain mercury. We solicit comment on this assumption of air quality
improvements and the extent of such improvements.
    Although we are not proposing requirements to control HAP emitted
from nonpoint sources, the work practices presented as potential
methods to control these emissions would improve air quality. We
solicit comment on the potential for improvement in air quality by
reduction in HAP and PM2.5 with the implementation of the
work practices for nonpoint sources.

C. What are the cost impacts?

    In this proposal, as described above, we are proposing compliance
testing or scrap selection requirements to control and reduce mercury
emissions. We expect that facilities that choose scrap selection likely
will not incur operational costs to comply with this requirement
because we believe that most, if not all, facilities are already
purchasing scrap from providers who participate in the NVMSRP. However,
we estimate a cost of $1,058 per year per facility and $11,638 per year
for all 11 facilities in the industry, for recordkeeping and reporting
of compliance with the program. We solicit comment on this assumption
and the estimated costs for the proposed mercury standard.
    Although we are not proposing requirements to control HAP emitted

from seven nonpoint sources, we estimate that the work practices
evaluated to reduce these emissions would cost an estimated $8.7
million in capital costs and $3 million annually to the industry if
they were included in the rule. We estimate the total capital costs of
proposing requirements to control HAP from the two nonpoint sources of
BF casthouse and BOPF shop to be about $1.4 million and annualized
costs to be about $1.7 million per year. These costs are described in
the memorandum titled Cost Estimates and Other Impacts for the
Integrated Iron and Steel Risk and Technology Review, available in the
docket to this rule. We solicit comment on these estimated costs of
implementation of work practices for nonpoint sources.

D. What are the economic impacts?

    No economic impacts are expected to be incurred by integrated iron
and steel manufacturing facilities due to the proposed mercury standard
because we believe that most, if not all, facilities are already
purchasing scrap from providers who participate in the NVMSRP. We
solicit comment on this assumption.
    Although we are not proposing requirements to control HAP emitted
from nonpoint sources, the work practices evaluated to reduce these
emissions could have an economic impact on facilities if they were
required. We solicit comment on the potential economic impact on
integrated iron and steel manufacturing facilities if implementation of
these work practices for nonpoint sources was required. There may be
energy savings from reducing leaks of BF gas from bells, which is one
of the work practices described in this preamble. We solicit comment on
the potential cost savings for integrated iron and steel manufacturing
facilities with implementation of this work practice.

E. What are the benefits?

    The proposed amendments may result in some unquantified reductions
in emissions of mercury, depending on the extent of current limitation
of mercury input or participation in the scrap selection program by
integrated iron and steel manufacturing facilities. While the EPA
believes most, or all, facilities are already meeting the proposed
mercury standard, to the extent that additional reductions may be
achieved, if finalized, this rule would result in improved health in
surrounding populations, especially protection of children from the
negative health impacts of mercury exposure.
    The proposed requirements to submit reports and test results
electronically would improve monitoring, compliance, and implementation
of the rule.
    Although we are not proposing requirements to control HAP emitted
from nonpoint sources, the work practices evaluated to reduce these HAP
emissions (with concurrent control of PM and PM2.5) and for
which EPA is soliciting comment on, if adopted, could improve air
quality and health of persons living in surrounding communities.

VI. Request for Comments

    We solicit comments on this proposal. In addition to general
comments on this proposed action, we are especially interested in
receiving comments regarding the estimated emissions from nonpoint
(UFIP) sources, the potential for the work practices, individually or
together, to reduce emissions from the nonpoint sources, and the
estimated costs of the work practices. We are also interested in
additional data that may improve the risk assessments and other
analyses. We are specifically interested in receiving any improvements
to the data used in the site-specific emissions profiles used in the
risk assessment, including the estimates and assumptions used for the
example facility risk assessment. Such data should include supporting
documentation in sufficient detail to allow characterization of the
quality and representativeness of the data or information. Section VII
of this preamble provides more information on submitting data.

VII. Submitting Data Corrections

    The site-specific emissions profiles used in the source category
risk and demographic analyses and instructions are available for
download on the RTR website at https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/integrated-iron-and-steel-manufacturing-national-emission-standards. The data files include detailed information for
each HAP emissions release point for the facilities in the source
category.
    If you believe that the data are not representative or are
inaccurate, please identify the data in question, provide your reason
for concern, and provide any ``improved'' data that you have, if
available. When you submit data, we request that you provide
documentation of the basis for the revised values to support your
suggested changes. To submit comments on the data downloaded from the
RTR website, complete the following steps:
    1. Within this downloaded file, enter suggested revisions to the
data fields appropriate for that information.
    2. Fill in the commenter information fields for each suggested
revision (i.e., commenter name, commenter organization, commenter email
address, commenter phone number, and revision comments).
    3. Gather documentation for any suggested emissions revisions
(e.g., performance test reports, material balance calculations).
    4. Send the entire downloaded file with suggested revisions in
Microsoft[supreg] Access format and all accompanying documentation to
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2002-0083 (through the method described in the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble).
    5. If you are providing comments on a single facility or multiple
facilities, you need only submit one file for all facilities. The file
should contain all suggested changes for all sources at that facility
(or facilities). We request that all data revision comments be
submitted in the form of updated Microsoft[supreg] Excel files that are
generated by the Microsoft[supreg] Access file. These files are
provided on the RTR website at https://www.epa.gov/stationary-sources-air-pollution/integrated-iron-and-steel-manufacturing-national-emission-standards.

VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Additional information about these statutes and Executive Orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is a significant regulatory action that was submitted
to OMB for review because it has novel legal and policy issues. Any
changes made in response to OMB recommendations have been documented in
the docket.

B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs

    This action is not expected to be subject to Executive Order 13771
because this proposed rule is expected to result in no more than de
minimis costs.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    The information collection activities in this proposed rule have
been submitted for approval to OMB under the PRA. The ICR document that
the EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR number 2003.08. You can find
a copy of the ICR in the docket for this rule, and it is briefly
summarized here.

    We are proposing amendments that require electronic reporting;
remove the SSM exemptions; and impose other revisions that affect
reporting and recordkeeping for integrated iron and steel manufacturing
facilities. We are also proposing standards for mercury that will
require facilities to certify the type of steel scrap they use. This
information would be collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR part
63, subpart FFFFF.
    Respondents/affected entities: Integrated iron and steel
manufacturing facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart FFFFF).
    Estimated number of respondents: 11 facilities.
    Frequency of response: One time.
    Total estimated burden of entire rule: The annual recordkeeping and
reporting burden for facilities to comply with all of the requirements
in the NESHAP is estimated to be 6,500 hours (per year). Burden is
defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost of entire rule: The annual recordkeeping and
reporting cost for all facilities to comply with all of the
requirements in the NESHAP is estimated to be $800,000 (per year), of
which $20,000 (per year) is for this proposal, and $780,000 is for
other costs related to continued compliance with the NESHAP including
$50,300 for paperwork associated with operation and maintenance
requirements. The total rule costs reflect a savings of $240,000 (per
year) from the previous ICR due to the transition to electronic
reporting.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the
EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
    Submit your comments on the Agency's need for this information, the
accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods
for minimizing respondent burden to the EPA using the docket identified
at the beginning of this rule. You may also send your ICR-related
comments to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs via
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Attention: Desk Officer for the
EPA. Since OMB is required to make a decision concerning the ICR
between 30 and 60 days after receipt, OMB must receive comments no
later than September 16, 2019. The EPA will respond to any ICR-related
comments in the final rule.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action would not impose any requirements on small entities. No small
entities are subject to the requirements of this rule.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It will not have substantial direct effects on
tribal governments, on the relationship between the Federal government
and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal government and Indian tribes. No tribal governments
own facilities subject to the NESHAP. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does
not apply to this action.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because the EPA
does not believe the environmental health or safety risks addressed by
this action present a disproportionate risk to children. This action's
health and risk assessments are contained in sections III and IV of
this preamble and further documented in the document titled Residual
Risk Assessment for the Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing Source
Category in Support of the Risk and Technology Review 2019 Proposed
Rule, available in the docket for this action.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' because it is
not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Only one new standard is proposed in
this rule, which under one compliance option would require facilities
to purchase steel scrap from suppliers who participate in a pollution
prevention program approved by the EPA, where motor vehicle switches
containing mercury are removed from steel scrap by the suppliers before
sale. These suppliers already provide steel scrap to most (or all) of
the current integrated iron and steel manufacturing facilities.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) and 1 CFR
Part 51

    This action involves technical standards. The EPA proposes to use
ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981, ``Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses,'' for its
manual methods of measuring the oxygen or carbon dioxide content of the
exhaust gas. This standard is acceptable as an alternative to EPA
Method 3B and is available from the American Society of Mechanical
Engineers (ASME) at http://www.asme.org; by mail at Three Park Avenue,
New York, NY 10016-5990; or by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The documentation for this decision is contained in section IV.A of
this preamble and the technical report titled Risk and Technology
Review--Analysis of Socio-Economic Factors for Populations Living Near
Integrated Iron and Steel Manufacturing Facilities, available in the
docket for this rule.
    We examined the potential for any environmental justice issues that
might be associated with the source category by performing a
demographic analysis of the population close to the facilities. In this
analysis, we evaluated the distribution of HAP-related cancer and
noncancer risks from the NESHAP source category across different
social, demographic, and economic groups within the populations living
near

facilities identified as having the highest risks. The methodology and
the results of the demographic analyses are included in a technical
report titled Risk and Technology Review--Analysis of Socio-Economic
Factors for Populations Living Near Integrated Iron and Steel
Manufacturing Facilities, available in the docket for this rule.
    The results of the source category demographic analysis for the
NESHAP (point sources only) indicate that emissions expose
approximately 60 people to a cancer risk at or above 10-in-1 million
and none exposed to a chronic noncancer TOSHI greater than or equal to
1. The specific demographic results indicate that the overall
percentage of the population potentially impacted by emissions is less
than its corresponding national percentage for the minority population
(37 percent for the source category compared to 38-percent nationwide).
However, the ``African American'' population (29 percent for the source
category compared to 12 percent nationwide) and the population ``Below
the Poverty Level'' are greater than their corresponding national
percentages. The proximity results (irrespective of risk) indicate that
the population percentages for certain demographic categories within 5
km of source category emissions are greater than the corresponding
national percentage for certain demographics groups including:
``African American,'' ``Ages 0 to 17,'' ``Over age 25 without a high
school diploma,'' and ``Below the poverty level.''
    The risks due to HAP emissions from this source category are low
for all populations (i.e., inhalation cancer risks are no greater than
or equal to 10-in-1 million for all populations and noncancer HI are no
greater than or equal to 1). Furthermore, we do not expect this
proposal to achieve significant reductions in HAP emissions. Therefore,
we conclude that this proposal will not have disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or low-
income populations because it does not affect the level of protection
provided to human health or the environment. However, this proposal, if
finalized, will provide additional benefits to these demographic groups
by improving the compliance, monitoring, and implementation of the
NESHAP.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Incorporation by reference, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: August 6, 2019.
Andrew R. Wheeler,
Administrator.
    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the EPA proposes to
amend 40 CFR part 63 as follows:

PART 63--NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
FOR SOURCE CATEGORIES

0
1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart A--[Amended]

0
2. Section 63.14 is amended by revising paragraphs (e)(1) and (n)(3) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.14  Incorporations by reference.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981, Flue and Exhaust Gas Analyses [Part
10, Instruments and Apparatus], issued August 31, 1981, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec.  63.309(k), 63.457(k), 63.772(e) and (h), 63.865(b),
63.1282(d) and (g), 63.1625(b), 63.3166(a), 63.3360(e), 63.3545(a),
63.3555(a), 63.4166(a), 63.4362(a), 63.4766(a), 63.4965(a), 63.5160(d),
table 4 to subpart UUUU, 63.7822(b), 63.7824(e), 63.7825(b),
63.9307(c), 63.9323(a), 63.11148(e), 63.11155(e), 63.11162(f),
63.11163(g), 63.11410(j), 63.11551(a), 63.11646(a), and 63.11945, table
5 to subpart DDDDD, table 4 to subpart JJJJJ, table 4 to subpart KKKKK,
tables 4 and 5 of subpart UUUUU, table 1 to subpart ZZZZZ, and table 4
to subpart JJJJJJ.
* * * * *
    (n) * * *
    (3) EPA-454/R-98-015, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
(OAQPS), Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection Guidance, September 1997,
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=2000D5T6.PDF, IBR approved
for Sec. Sec.  63.548(e), 63.864(e), 63.7525(j), 63.7831(f),
63.8450(e), 63.8600(e), and 63.11224(f).
* * * * *

Subpart FFFFF--[Amended]

0
3. Section 63.7782 is amended by revising paragraph (c) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.7782  What parts of my plant does this subpart cover?

* * * * *
    (c) This subpart addresses emissions from the sinter plant windbox
exhaust, discharge end, and sinter cooler; the BF and casthouse; and
the BOPF shop including each individual BOPF and shop ancillary
operations (hot metal transfer, hot metal desulfurization, slag
skimming, and ladle metallurgy).
* * * * *
0
4. Section 63.7783 is amended by revising the introductory text of
paragraph (a) and paragraphs (b) and (c) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.7783  When do I have to comply with this subpart?

    (a) If you have an existing affected source, you must comply with
each emission limitation, standard, and operation and maintenance
requirement in this subpart that applies to you by the dates specified
in paragraphs (a)(1) and (2) of this section.
* * * * *
    (b) If you have a new affected source and its initial startup date
is on or before May 20, 2003, then you must comply with each emission
limitation, standard, and operation and maintenance requirement in this
subpart that applies to you by May 20, 2003.
    (c) If you have a new affected source and its initial startup date
is after May 20, 2003, you must comply with each emission limitation,
standard, and operation and maintenance requirement in this subpart
that applies to you upon initial startup.
* * * * *
0
5. The undesignated center heading before Sec.  63.7790 is revised to
read as follows:

``Emission Limitations and Standards''

0
6. Section 63.7791 is added to read as follows:

Sec.  63.7791  What are the requirements for the control of mercury
from scrap?

    Mercury requirements. If you have an existing affected sources, you
must meet the mercury emission limit for each BOPF Group in Table 1 to
this subpart or procure steel scrap pursuant to the requirements in
paragraphs (a) through (c) of this section beginning [DATE 1 YEAR AFTER
DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. If the
initial startup of your affected source is after August 16, 2019 but
before [DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], you
must comply with the mercury requirements beginning [DATE OF
PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. If the initial
startup of your affected source is after [DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL
RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], then you must comply

with the mercury requirements upon initial startup of your affected
source. For participation in the National Vehicle Mercury Switch
Recovery Program (NVMSRP), you must procure scrap pursuant to the
requirements in paragraph (a) of this section for each scrap provider,
contract, or shipment. For scrap not likely to contain motor vehicle
scrap, you must procure scrap pursuant to the requirements in paragraph
(b) of this section for each scrap provider, contract, or shipment. For
scrap obtained under another EPA-approved program, you must procure
scrap pursuant to the requirements in paragraph (c) of this section for
each scrap provider, contract, or shipment. You may have certain scrap
providers, contracts, or shipments subject to one compliance provision
and others subject to another compliance provision.
    (a) Participation in the NVMSRP. (1) You must obtain all post-
consumer scrap likely to contain vehicle scrap from scrap providers who
participate in the NVMSRP. The NVMSRP is an EPA-approved program under
this section unless and until the Administrator disapproves the program
(in part or in whole);
    (2) You must certify in your notification of compliance status that
you purchase post-consumer steel scrap according to paragraph (a)(1) of
this section;
    (3) If you purchase scrap from a broker, you must certify that all
scrap received from that broker was obtained from other scrap providers
who participate in the NVMSRP;
    (4) You must develop and maintain onsite a plan demonstrating the
manner through which your facility is participating in the NVMSRP. The
plan must include facility-specific implementation elements, corporate-
wide policies, and/or efforts coordinated by a trade association as
appropriate for each facility. The plan must include a list of all
suppliers and proof of participation in an approved mercury reduction
program. You must provide in the plan documentation of direction to
appropriate staff to communicate to suppliers throughout the scrap
supply chain the need to promote the removal of mercury switches from
end-of-life vehicles. Upon the request of the permitting authority, you
must provide examples of materials that are used for outreach to
suppliers, such as letters, contract language, policies for purchasing
agents, and scrap inspection protocols; and
    (5) You must conduct periodic inspections or provide other means of
corroboration to ensure that scrap providers and brokers are aware of
the need for and are implementing appropriate steps to minimize the
presence of mercury in scrap from end-of-life vehicles.
    (b) Scrap not likely to contain motor vehicle scrap. For scrap not
subject to the requirements in paragraphs (a) and (c) of this section,
you must:
    (1) Obtain information from scrap suppliers or other entity with
established knowledge of scrap content that the steel scrap used is not
likely to contain motor vehicle scrap and maintain records of the
information; and
    (2) Certify in your notification of compliance status that the
scrap is not likely to contain motor vehicle scrap, according to the
information obtained and recorded.
    (c) Use of approved mercury program. (1) You must obtain all post-
consumer scrap likely to contain vehicle scrap from scrap providers who
participate in a program for the removal of mercury switches that has
been approved by the Administrator based on the criteria in paragraphs
(c)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section;
    (i) The program includes outreach that informs the dismantlers of
the need for removal of mercury switches and provides training and
guidance for removing mercury switches;
    (ii) The program has a goal to remove at least 80 percent of
mercury switches from the motor vehicle scrap the scrap provider
processes. Although a program approved under paragraph (c) of this
section may require only the removal of convenience light switch
mechanisms, the Administrator will credit all documented and verifiable
mercury-containing components removed from motor vehicle scrap (such as
sensors in anti-locking brake systems, security systems, active ride
control, and other applications) when evaluating progress towards the
80 percent goal; and
    (iii) The program sponsor agrees to submit progress reports to the
Administrator no less frequently than once every year that provide the
number of mercury switches removed or the weight of mercury recovered
from the switches, the estimated number of vehicles processed, an
estimate of the percent of mercury switches recovered, and
certification that the recovered mercury switches were recycled at
facilities with permits as required under the rules implementing
subtitle C of RCRA (40 CFR parts 261 through 265 and 268). The progress
reports must be based on a database that includes data for each program
participant; however, data may be aggregated at the State level for
progress reports that will be publicly available. The Administrator may
change the approval status of a program or portion of a program (e.g.,
at the State level) following a 90-day notice based on the progress
reports or on other information;
    (2) You must certify in your notification of compliance status that
you purchase post-consumer steel scrap according to paragraph (c)(1) of
this section;
    (3) If you purchase scrap from a broker, you must certify that all
scrap received from that broker was obtained from other scrap providers
who participate in a program for the removal of mercury switches that
has been approved by the Administrator based on the criteria in
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section;
    (4) You must develop and maintain onsite a plan demonstrating the
manner through which your facility is participating in the EPA-approved
program. The plan must include facility-specific implementation
elements, corporate-wide policies, and/or efforts coordinated by a
trade association as appropriate for each facility. The plan must
include a list of all suppliers and proof of participation in an
approved mercury reduction program. You must provide in the plan
documentation of direction to appropriate staff to communicate to
suppliers throughout the scrap supply chain the need to promote the
removal of mercury switches from end-of-life vehicles. Upon the request
of the permitting authority, you must provide examples of materials
that are used for outreach to suppliers, such as letters, contract
language, policies for purchasing agents, and scrap inspection
protocols; and
    (5) You must conduct periodic inspections or provide other means of
corroboration to ensure that scrap providers and brokers are aware of
the need for and are implementing appropriate steps to minimize the
presence of mercury in scrap from end-of-life vehicles.
0
7. Section 63.7800 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and the
introductory text of paragraph (b) and adding paragraph (b)(8) to read
as follows:

Sec.  63.7800  What are my operation and maintenance requirements?

    (a) As required by Sec.  63.7810(c), you must always operate and
maintain your affected source, including air pollution control and
monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with good air pollution
control practices for minimizing emissions at least to the levels
required by this subpart.
    (b) You must prepare and operate at all times according to a
written operation and maintenance plan for

each capture system or control device subject to an operating limit in
Sec.  63.7790(b). Each plan must address the elements in paragraphs
(b)(1) through (8) of this section.
* * * * *
    (8) The compliance procedures within the operation and maintenance
plan shall not include any periods of startup or shutdown in emissions
calculations.
0
8. Section 63.7810 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (c) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.7810  What are my general requirements for complying with this
subpart?

    (a) You must be in compliance with the emission limitations,
standards, and operation and maintenance requirements in this subpart
at all times.
* * * * *
    (c) At all times, you must operate and maintain any affected
source, including associated air pollution control equipment and
monitoring equipment, in a manner consistent with safety and good air
pollution control practices for minimizing emissions. Determination of
whether a source is operating in compliance with operation and
maintenance requirements will be based on information available to the
Administrator which may include, but is not limited to, monitoring
results, review of operation and maintenance procedures, review of
operation and maintenance records, and inspection of the source.
0
9. Section 63.7821 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and adding
paragraph (e) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.7821  When must I conduct subsequent performance tests?

    (a) You must conduct subsequent performance tests to demonstrate
compliance with all applicable emission and opacity limits in Table 1
to this subpart at the frequencies specified in paragraphs (b) through
(e) of this section.
* * * * *
    (e) For each BOPF Group, if complying with the mercury emission
limit in Table 1, you must conduct subsequent performance tests
annually at the outlet of the control devices for the BOPF Group, with
no two consecutive annual performance tests occurring less than 3
months apart or more than 15 months apart.
0
10. Section 63.7822 is amended by revising paragraphs (a) and (b)(1) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.7822  What test methods and other procedures must I use to
demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limits for particulate
matter?

    (a) You must conduct each performance test that applies to your
affected source based on representative performance (i.e., performance
based on normal operating conditions) of the affected source for the
period being tested, according to the conditions detailed in paragraphs
(b) through (i) of this section. Representative conditions exclude
periods of startup and shutdown. You shall not conduct performance
tests during periods of malfunction. You must record the process
information that is necessary to document operating conditions during
the test and include in such record an explanation to support that such
conditions represent normal operation. Upon request, you shall make
available to the Administrator such records as may be necessary to
determine the conditions of performance tests.
    (b) * * *
    (1) Determine the concentration of particulate matter according to
the following test methods:
    (i) Method 1 in appendix A-1 to part 60 of this chapter to select
sampling port locations and the number of traverse points. Sampling
ports must be located at the outlet of the control device and prior to
any releases to the atmosphere.
    (ii) Method 2 or 2F in appendix A-1 to part 60 of this chapter or
Method 2G in appendix A-2 to part 60 of this chapter to determine the
volumetric flow rate of the stack gas.
    (iii) Method 3, 3A, or 3B in appendix A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter to determine the dry molecular weight of the stack gas. The
voluntary consensus standard ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981--Part 10
(incorporated by reference--see Sec.  63.14) may be used as an
alternative to the manual procedures (but not instrumental procedures)
in Method 3B.
    (iv) Method 4 in appendix A-3 to part 60 of this chapter to
determine the moisture content of the stack gas.
    (v) Method 5 or 5D in appendix A-3 to part 60 of this chapter or
Method 17 in appendix A-6 to part 60 of this chapter, as applicable, to
determine the concentration of particulate matter (front half
filterable catch only).
* * * * *
0
11. Section 63.7823 is amended by revising paragraphs (a), (c)(1),
(d)(1)(i) through (iii), (d)(2)(i), and (e)(1) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.7823  What test methods and other procedures must I use to
demonstrate initial compliance with the opacity limits?

    (a) You must conduct each performance test that applies to your
affected source based on representative performance (i.e., performance
based on normal operating conditions) of the affected source for the
period being tested, according to the conditions detailed in paragraphs
(b) through (d) of this section. Representative conditions exclude
periods of startup and shutdown. You shall not conduct performance
tests during periods of malfunction. You must record the process
information that is necessary to document operating conditions during
the test and include in such record an explanation to support that such
conditions represent normal operation. Upon request, you shall make
available to the Administrator such records as may be necessary to
determine the conditions of performance tests.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) Using a certified observer, determine the opacity of emissions
according to Method 9 in appendix A-4 to part 60 of this chapter.
* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) Using a certified observer, determine the opacity of emissions
according to Method 9 in appendix A-4 to part 60 of this chapter except
as specified in paragraphs (d)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this section.
    (ii) Instead of procedures in section 2.4 of Method 9 in appendix
A-4 to part 60 of this chapter, record observations to the nearest 5
percent at 15-second intervals for at least three steel production
cycles.
    (iii) Instead of procedures in section 2.5 of Method 9 in appendix
A-4 to part 60 of this chapter, determine the 3-minute block average
opacity from the average of 12 consecutive observations recorded at 15-
second intervals.
    (2) * * *
    (i) Using a certified observer, determine the opacity of emissions
according to Method 9 in appendix A-4 to part 60 of this chapter.
* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) Using a certified observer, determine the opacity of emissions
according to Method 9 in appendix A-4 to part 60 of this chapter.
* * * * *
0
12. Section 63.7824 is amended by revising the introductory text of
paragraph (e), paragraphs (e)(1) and (2), and the defined term
``Mc'' in Equation 1 in paragraph (e)(3) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.7824  What test methods and other procedures must I use to
establish and demonstrate initial compliance with operating limits?

* * * * *
    (e) To demonstrate initial compliance with the alternative
operating limit for volatile organic compound emissions from the sinter
plant windbox exhaust stream in Sec.  63.7790(d)(2), follow the test
methods and procedures in paragraphs (e)(1) through (5) of this
section. You must conduct each performance test that applies to your
affected source based on representative performance (i.e., performance
based on normal operating conditions) of the affected source for the
period being tested. Representative conditions exclude periods of
startup and shutdown. You shall not conduct performance tests during
periods of malfunction. You must record the process information that is
necessary to document operating conditions during the test and include
in such record an explanation to support that such conditions represent
normal operation. Upon request, you shall make available to the
Administrator such records as may be necessary to determine the
conditions of performance tests.
    (1) Determine the volatile organic compound emissions according to
the following test methods:
    (i) Method 1 in appendix A-1 to part 60 of this chapter to select
sampling port locations and the number of traverse points. Sampling
ports must be located at the outlet of the control device and prior to
any releases to the atmosphere.
    (ii) Method 2 or 2F in appendix A-1 to part 60 of this chapter or
Method 2G in appendix A-2 to part 60 of this chapter to determine the
volumetric flow rate of the stack gas.
    (iii) Method 3, 3A, or 3B in appendix A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter to determine the dry molecular weight of the stack gas. The
voluntary consensus standard ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981--Part 10
(incorporated by reference--see Sec.  63.14) may be used as an
alternative to the manual procedures (but not instrumental procedures)
in Method 3B.
    (iv) Method 4 in appendix A-3 to part 60 of this chapter to
determine the moisture content of the stack gas.
    (v) Method 25 in appendix A-7 to part 60 of this chapter to
determine the mass concentration of volatile organic compound emissions
(total gaseous nonmethane organics as carbon) from the sinter plant
windbox exhaust stream stack.
    (2) Determine volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions every 24
hours (from at least three samples taken at 8-hour intervals) using
Method 25 in 40 CFR part 60, appendix A-7. Record the sampling date and
time, sampling results, and sinter produced (tons/day).
    (3) * * *
    Mc = Average concentration of total gaseous nonmethane
organics as carbon by Method 25 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A-7),
milligrams per dry standard cubic meters (mg/dscm) for each day;
* * * * *
0
13. Sections 63.7825 and 63.7826 are redesignated as Sec. Sec.  63.7826
and 63.7827, respectively, and a new Sec.  63.7825 is added to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.7825  What test methods and other procedures must I use to
demonstrate initial compliance with the emission limit for mercury?

    (a) If you choose to comply with the mercury emission limit for
each BOPF Group in Table 1 to this subpart, you must conduct a
performance test to demonstrate initial compliance with the emission
limit. You must conduct each performance test that applies to your
affected source based on representative performance (i.e., performance
based on normal operating conditions) of the affected source for the
period being tested, according to the conditions detailed in paragraphs
(b) through (f) of this section. Representative conditions exclude
periods of startup and shutdown. You shall not conduct performance
tests during periods of malfunction.
    (1) You must record the process information that is necessary to
document operating conditions during the test and include in such
record an explanation to support that such conditions represent normal
operation. Upon request, you shall make available to the Administrator
such records as may be necessary to determine the conditions of
performance tests.
    (2) For sources with multiple emission units ducted to a common
control device and stack, compliance testing must be performed either
by conducting a single compliance test with all affected emissions
units in operation or by conducting a separate compliance test on each
emissions unit. Alternatively, the owner or operator may request
approval from the permit authority for an alternative testing approach.
If the units are tested separately, any emissions unit that is not
tested initially must be tested as soon as is practicable.
    (b) To determine compliance with the emission limit for mercury in
Table 1 to this subpart, follow the test methods and procedures in
paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
    (1) Determine the concentration of mercury according to the
following test methods:
    (i) Method 1 in appendix A-1 to part 60 of this chapter to select
sampling port locations and the number of traverse points. Sampling
ports must be located at the outlet of the control device and prior to
any releases to the atmosphere.
    (ii) Method 2 or 2F in appendix A-1 to part 60 of this chapter or
Method 2G in appendix A-2 to part 60 of this chapter to determine the
volumetric flow rate of the stack gas.
    (iii) Method 3, 3A, or 3B in appendix A-2 to part 60 of this
chapter to determine the dry molecular weight of the stack gas. The
voluntary consensus standard ANSI/ASME PTC 19.10-1981--Part 10
(incorporated by reference--see Sec.  63.14) may be used as an
alternative to the manual procedures (but not instrumental procedures)
in Method 3B.
    (iv) Method 4 in appendix A-3 to part 60 of this chapter to
determine the moisture content of the stack gas.
    (v) Method 29 or 30B in appendix A-8 to part 60 of this chapter to
determine the concentration of mercury from each unit of the BOPF Group
exhaust stream stack.
    (2) Collect a minimum sample volume of 60 dscf of gas during each
mercury test run. Three valid test runs are needed to comprise a
performance test of each BOPF Group unit. If the emission testing
results for any of the emission points yields a non-detect value, then
the minimum detection limit (MDL) must be used to calculate the mass
emissions (lb) for that emission unit and, in turn, for calculating the
sum of the emissions (in units of pounds of mercury per ton of steel
scrap) for all BOPF Group units subject to the emission standard for
determining compliance. If the resulting mercury emissions are greater
than the MACT emission standard, the owner or operator may use
procedures that produce lower MDL results and repeat the mercury
emissions testing one additional time for any emission point for which
the measured result was below the MDL. If this additional testing is
performed, the results from that testing must be used to determine
compliance (i.e., there are no additional opportunities allowed to
lower the MDL).
    (c) Calculate the mercury mass emissions, based on the average of
three test run values, for each BOPF Group unit (or combination of
units that are ducted to a common stack and are tested when all
affected sources are operating pursuant to paragraph (a) of this
section)

using Equation 1 of this section as follows:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP16AU19.247

Where:

E = Mass emissions of mercury, pounds (lb);
Cs = Concentration of mercury in stack gas, gr/dscf;
Vmstd = Standard meter volume, dscf; and
K = Conversion factor, 7,000 gr/lb.

    (d) You must install, calibrate, maintain and operate an
appropriate weight measurement device, to measure the tons of steel
scrap input to the BOPF cycle simultaneous with each BOPF Group unit's
stack test.
    (e) You must maintain the systems for measuring weight within
5 percent accuracy. You must describe the specific
equipment used to make measurements at your facility and how that
equipment is periodically calibrated. You must also explain, document,
and maintain written procedures for determining the accuracy of the
measurements and make these written procedures available to your
permitting authority upon request. You must determine, record, and
maintain a record of the accuracy of the measuring systems before the
beginning of your initial compliance test and during each subsequent
quarter of affected source operation.
    (f) Calculate the emissions from each new and existing affected
source in pounds of mercury per ton of steel scrap to determine initial
compliance with the mercury emission limit in Table 1. Sum the mercury
mass emissions (in pounds) from all BOPF Group units calculated using
Equation 1 of this section. Divide that sum by the sum of the total
amount of steel scrap charged to the BOPFs (in tons).
0
14. Section 63.7831 is amended by revising paragraph (f)(4) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.7831  What are the installation, operation, and maintenance
requirements for my monitors?

* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (4) Each system that works based on the triboelectric effect must
be installed, operated, and maintained in a manner consistent with the
guidance document, ``Fabric Filter Bag Leak Detection Guidance,'' EPA-
454/R-98-015, September 1997 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
63.14). You may install, operate, and maintain other types of bag leak
detection systems in a manner consistent with the manufacturer's
written specifications and recommendations.
* * * * *
0
15. Section 63.7833 is amended by revising paragraph (g)(3) and adding
paragraphs (h) and (i) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.7833  How do I demonstrate continuous compliance with the
emission limitations that apply to me?

* * * * *
    (g) * * *
    (3) For purposes of paragraphs (g)(1) and (2) of this section, in
the case of an exceedance of the hourly average opacity operating limit
for an electrostatic precipitator, measurements of the hourly average
opacity based on visible emission observations in accordance with
Method 9 (40 CFR part 60, appendix A-4) may be taken to evaluate the
effectiveness of corrective action.
* * * * *
    (h) If you choose to comply with Sec.  63.7791 by complying with
the mercury emissions limits in Table 1 for BOPF Groups, you must
conduct annual mercury performance tests in accordance with Sec.
63.7821(e) and calculate the emissions from each new and existing
affected source in pounds of mercury per ton of steel scrap to
determine annual compliance with the mercury emission limits in Table
1. Sum the mercury mass emissions (in pounds) from all BOPF Group units
calculated using Equation 1 of Sec.  63.7825. Divide that sum by the
sum of the total amount of steel scrap charged to the BOPFs (in tons).
    (i) If you choose to comply with Sec.  63.7791 by using the NVMSRP
or another EPA- approved mercury program, or by using scrap not likely
to contain mercury, you must obtain and certify the use of steel scrap
per Sec.  63.7791(a), (b), or (c), as applicable, to demonstrate
continuous compliance with the standard.
0
16. Section 63.7835 is revised to read as follows:

Sec.  63.7835  What other requirements must I meet to demonstrate
continuous compliance?

    Except as provided in Sec.  63.7833(g), you must report each
instance in which you did not meet each emission limitation in Sec.
63.7790 that applies to you. This includes periods of startup,
shutdown, and malfunction. You also must report each instance in which
you did not meet each operation and maintenance requirement in Sec.
63.7800 that applies to you. These instances are deviations from the
emission limitations and operation and maintenance requirements in this
subpart. These deviations must be reported according to the
requirements in Sec.  63.7841.
    (a) In the event that an affected unit fails to meet an applicable
standard, record the number of failures. For each failure, record the
date, time and duration of each failure.
    (b) For each failure to meet an applicable standard, record and
retain a list of the affected sources or equipment, an estimate of the
quantity of each regulated pollutant emitted over any emission limit
and a description of the method used to estimate the emissions.
    (c) Record actions taken to minimize emissions in accordance with
Sec.  63.7810(c), and any corrective actions taken to return the
affected unit to its normal or usual manner of operation.
0
17. Section 63.7840 is amended by revising paragraph (e)(2) and adding
paragraphs (f) through (h) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.7840  What notifications must I submit and when?

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (2) For each initial compliance demonstration that includes a
performance test, you must submit the notification of compliance
status, including the summary of performance test results, before the
close of business on the 60th calendar day following the completion of
the performance test according to Sec.  63.10(d)(2).
    (f) The notification of compliance status required by Sec.  63.9(h)
must include each applicable certification of compliance, signed by a
responsible official, in paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) of this section,
regarding the mercury requirements in Sec.  63.7791.
    (1) ``This facility participates in and purchases scrap only from
scrap providers who participate in a program for removal of mercury
switches that has been approved by the EPA Administrator and has
prepared a plan demonstrating how the facility participates in the EPA-
approved program, in accordance with Sec.  63.7791(a)(4) or (c)(4)'';
or
    (2) ``This facility complies with the requirements for scrap that
is not likely to contain motor vehicle scrap, in accordance with Sec.
63.7791(b).''
    (g) Within 60 calendar days after the date of completing each
performance test required by this subpart, you must submit the results
of the performance test following the procedures specified in
paragraphs (g)(1) through (3) of this section. Where applicable, you
may assert a claim of EPA system outage, in accordance with Sec.
63.7841(e), or force majeure, in accordance with

Sec.  63.7841(f), for failure to timely comply with this requirement.
    (1) Data collected using test methods supported by EPA's Electronic
Reporting Tool (ERT) as listed on EPA's ERT website (https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/electronic-reporting-tool-ert) at the time of the test. Submit the results of the
performance test to the EPA via the Compliance and Emissions Data
Reporting Interface (CEDRI), which can be accessed through EPA's
Central Data Exchange (CDX) (https://cdx.epa.gov/). The data must be
submitted in a file format generated through the use of EPA's ERT.
Alternatively, you may submit an electronic file consistent with the
extensible markup language (XML) schema listed on EPA's ERT website.
    (2) Data collected using test methods that are not supported by
EPA's ERT as listed on EPA's ERT website at the time of the test. The
results of the performance test must be included as an attachment in
the ERT or an alternate electronic file consistent with the XML schema
listed on EPA's ERT website. Submit the ERT generated package or
alternative file to the EPA via CEDRI.
    (3) Confidential business information (CBI). If you claim some of
the information submitted under paragraph (g) of this section is CBI,
you must submit a complete file, including information claimed to be
CBI, to the EPA. The file must be generated through the use of EPA's
ERT or an alternate electronic file consistent with the XML schema
listed on EPA's ERT website. Submit the file on a compact disc, flash
drive, or other commonly used electronic storage medium and clearly
mark the medium as CBI. Mail the electronic medium to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/
CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader, Measurement Policy Group, MD
C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same file with the
CBI omitted must be submitted to the EPA via EPA's CDX as described in
paragraph (g) of this section.
    (h) Within 60 calendar days after the date of completing each
continuous monitoring system (CMS) performance evaluation (as defined
in Sec.  63.2), you must submit the results of the performance
evaluation following the procedures specified in paragraphs (h)(1)
through (3) of this section. Where applicable, you may assert a claim
of EPA system outage, in accordance with Sec.  63.7841(e), or force
majeure, in accordance with Sec.  63.7841(f), for failure to timely
comply with this requirement.
    (1) Performance evaluations of CMS measuring relative accuracy test
audit (RATA) pollutants that are supported by EPA's ERT as listed on
EPA's ERT website at the time of the evaluation. Submit the results of
the performance evaluation to the EPA via CEDRI, which can be accessed
through EPA's CDX. The data must be submitted in a file format
generated through the use of EPA's ERT. Alternatively, you may submit
an electronic file consistent with the XML schema listed on EPA's ERT
website.
    (2) Performance evaluations of CMS measuring RATA pollutants that
are not supported by EPA's ERT as listed on EPA's ERT website at the
time of the evaluation. The results of the performance evaluation must
be included as an attachment in the ERT or an alternate electronic file
consistent with the XML schema listed on EPA's ERT website. Submit the
ERT generated package or alternative file to the EPA via CEDRI.
    (3) Confidential business information (CBI). If you claim some of
the information submitted under paragraph (h) of this section is CBI,
you must submit a complete file, including information claimed to be
CBI, to the EPA. The file must be generated through the use of EPA's
ERT or an alternate electronic file consistent with the XML schema
listed on EPA's ERT website. Submit the file on a compact disc, flash
drive, or other commonly used electronic storage medium and clearly
mark the medium as CBI. Mail the electronic medium to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/
CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader, Measurement Policy Group, MD
C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC 27703. The same file with the
CBI omitted must be submitted to the EPA via EPA's CDX as described in
paragraph (h) of this section.
0
18. Section 63.7841 is amended by:
0
a. Revising the introductory text of paragraph (b), paragraph (b)(4),
the introductory text of paragraph (b)(8), and paragraphs (b)(8)(iv)
and (vi);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (b)(9) and (10);
0
c. Revising paragraph (c);
0
d. Redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (g) and revising the newly
redesignated paragraph; and
0
e. Adding new paragraphs (d) through (f).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  63.7841  What reports must I submit and when?

* * * * *
    (b) Compliance report contents. Each compliance report must include
the information in paragraphs (b)(1) through (3) of this section and,
as applicable, paragraphs (b)(4) through (10) of this section.
* * * * *
    (4) If you failed to meet an applicable standard, the compliance
report must include the number of failures to meet an applicable
standard and the date, time and duration of each failure. For each
failure, the compliance report must include a list of the affected
sources or equipment, an estimate of the quantity of each regulated
pollutant emitted over any emission limit, and a description of the
method used to estimate the emissions.
* * * * *
    (8) For each deviation from an emission limitation occurring at an
affected source where you are using a continuous monitoring system
(including a CPMS or COMS) to comply with the emission limitation in
this subpart, you must include the information in paragraphs (b)(1)
through (4) of this section and the information in paragraphs (b)(8)(i)
through (xi) of this section. This includes periods of malfunction.
* * * * *
    (iv) The date and time that each deviation started and stopped, and
whether each deviation occurred during a malfunction or during another
period.
* * * * *
    (vi) A breakdown of the total duration of the deviations during the
reporting period including those that are due to control equipment
problems, process problems, other known causes, and other unknown
causes.
* * * * *
    (9) Any deviation from the requirements in Sec.  63.7791(a) and the
corrective action taken.
    (10) If there were no deviations from the requirements in Sec.
63.7791(a), a statement that there were no deviations from the
requirements during the reporting period.
    (c) Beginning on [date 6 months after date of publication of final
rule in the Federal Register], submit all subsequent reports following
the procedure specified in paragraph (d) of this section.
    (d) If you are required to submit reports following the procedure
specified in this paragraph, you must submit reports to the EPA via
CEDRI, which can be accessed through EPA's CDX (https://cdx.epa.gov/).
You must use the appropriate electronic report template on the CEDRI
website (https://www.epa.gov/electronic-reporting-air-emissions/compliance-and-emissions-data-reporting-interface-cedri) for this
subpart. The date report templates become available will be listed on
the CEDRI website. The report must be submitted by the deadline
specified in this subpart, regardless of the method in

which the report is submitted. If you claim some of the information
required to be submitted via CEDRI is CBI, submit a complete report,
including information claimed to be CBI, to the EPA. The report must be
generated using the appropriate form on the CEDRI website. Submit the
file on a compact disc, flash drive, or other commonly used electronic
storage medium and clearly mark the medium as CBI. Mail the electronic
medium to U.S. EPA/OAQPS/CORE CBI Office, Attention: Group Leader,
Measurement Policy Group, MD C404-02, 4930 Old Page Rd., Durham, NC
27703. The same file with the CBI omitted must be submitted to the EPA
via EPA's CDX as described earlier in this paragraph.
    (e) If you are required to electronically submit a report through
CEDRI in EPA's CDX, you may assert a claim of EPA system outage for
failure to timely comply with the reporting requirement. To assert a
claim of EPA system outage, you must meet the requirements outlined in
paragraphs (e)(1) through (7) of this section.
    (1) You must have been or will be precluded from accessing CEDRI
and submitting a required report within the time prescribed due to an
outage of either EPA's CEDRI or CDX systems.
    (2) The outage must have occurred within the period of time
beginning five business days prior to the date that the submission is
due.
    (3) The outage may be planned or unplanned.
    (4) You must submit notification to the Administrator in writing as
soon as possible following the date you first knew, or through due
diligence should have known, that the event may cause or has caused a
delay in reporting.
    (5) You must provide to the Administrator a written description
identifying:
    (i) The date(s) and time(s) when CDX or CEDRI was accessed and the
system was unavailable;
    (ii) A rationale for attributing the delay in reporting beyond the
regulatory deadline to EPA system outage;
    (iii) Measures taken or to be taken to minimize the delay in
reporting; and
    (iv) The date by which you propose to report, or if you have
already met the reporting requirement at the time of the notification,
the date you reported.
    (6) The decision to accept the claim of EPA system outage and allow
an extension to the reporting deadline is solely within the discretion
of the Administrator.
    (7) In any circumstance, the report must be submitted
electronically as soon as possible after the outage is resolved.
    (f) If you are required to electronically submit a report through
CEDRI in EPA's CDX, you may assert a claim of force majeure for failure
to timely comply with the reporting requirement. To assert a claim of
force majeure, you must meet the requirements outlined in paragraphs
(f)(1) through (5) of this section.
    (1) You may submit a claim if a force majeure event is about to
occur, occurs, or has occurred or there are lingering effects from such
an event within the period of time beginning five business days prior
to the date the submission is due. For the purposes of this section, a
force majeure event is defined as an event that will be or has been
caused by circumstances beyond the control of the affected facility,
its contractors, or any entity controlled by the affected facility that
prevents you from complying with the requirement to submit a report
electronically within the time period prescribed. Examples of such
events are acts of nature (e.g., hurricanes, earthquakes, or floods),
acts of war or terrorism, or equipment failure or safety hazard beyond
the control of the affected facility (e.g., large scale power outage).
    (2) You must submit notification to the Administrator in writing as
soon as possible following the date you first knew, or through due
diligence should have known, that the event may cause or has caused a
delay in reporting.
    (3) You must provide to the Administrator:
    (i) A written description of the force majeure event;
    (ii) A rationale for attributing the delay in reporting beyond the
regulatory deadline to the force majeure event;
    (iii) Measures taken or to be taken to minimize the delay in
reporting; and
    (iv) The date by which you propose to report, or if you have
already met the reporting requirement at the time of the notification,
the date you reported.
    (4) The decision to accept the claim of force majeure and allow an
extension to the reporting deadline is solely within the discretion of
the Administrator.
    (5) In any circumstance, the reporting must occur as soon as
possible after the force majeure event occurs.
    (g) Part 70 monitoring report. If you have obtained a title V
operating permit for an affected source pursuant to 40 CFR part 70 or
71, you must report all deviations as defined in this subpart in the
semiannual monitoring report required by 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or
40 CFR 71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A). If you submit a compliance report for an
affected source along with, or as part of, the semiannual monitoring
report required by 40 CFR 70.6(a)(3)(iii)(A) or 40 CFR
71.6(a)(3)(iii)(A), and the compliance report includes all the required
information concerning deviations from any emission limitation,
standard, or operation and maintenance requirement in this subpart,
submission of the compliance report satisfies any obligation to report
the same deviations in the semiannual monitoring report. However,
submission of a compliance report does not otherwise affect any
obligation you may have to report deviations from permit requirements
for an affected source to your permitting authority.
0
19. Section 63.7842 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a)(2);
0
b. Redesignating paragraph (a)(3) as paragraph (a)(5);
0
c. Adding new paragraphs (a)(3) and (a)(4);
0
d. Revising paragraph (b)(3); and
0
e. Adding paragraph (e).
    The revisions and additions read as follows:

Sec.  63.7842  What records must I keep?

    (a) * * *
    (2) Records of the date, time and duration of each failure to meet
an applicable standard.
    (3) For each failure to meet an applicable standard, a list of the
affected sources or equipment, an estimate of the quantity of each
regulated pollutant emitted over any emission limit, and a description
of the method used to estimate the emissions.
    (4) Records of the actions taken to minimize emissions in
accordance with Sec.  63.7810(c), and any corrective actions taken to
return the affected unit to its normal or usual manner of operation.
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (3) Previous (that is, superseded) versions of the performance
evaluation plan required under Sec.  63.8(d)(2), with the program of
corrective action included in the plan.
* * * * *
    (e) You must keep records to demonstrate compliance with the
requirements for mercury in Sec.  63.7791(a) as applicable. You must
keep records documenting compliance with Sec.  63.7791(b) for scrap not
likely to contain motor vehicle scrap. If you are subject to the
requirements for an approved mercury program under Sec.  63.7791(a),
you must maintain records identifying each scrap provider and
documenting the scrap provider's participation in an approved mercury
switch removal program. If you purchase scrap from a broker, you must
maintain records identifying each

broker and documentation that all scrap provided by the broker was
obtained from other scrap providers who participate in an approved
mercury switch removal program.
0
20. Section 63.7843 is amended by adding paragraph (d) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.7843  In what form and how long must I keep my records?

* * * * *
    (d) Any records required to be maintained by this part that are
submitted electronically via EPA's CEDRI may be maintained in
electronic format. This ability to maintain electronic copies does not
affect the requirement for facilities to make records, data, and
reports available upon request to a delegated air agency or the EPA as
part of an on-site compliance evaluation.
0
21. Section 63.7851 is amended by revising the introductory text of
paragraph (c) and adding paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.7851  Who implements and enforces this subpart?

* * * * *
    (c) The authorities that will not be delegated to State, local, or
tribal agencies are specified in paragraphs (c)(1) through (5) of this
section.
* * * * *
    (5) Approval of an alternative to any electronic reporting to the
EPA required by this subpart.
0
22. Section 63.7852 is amended by revising paragraph (1) under the
definition of ``deviation'' and adding, in alphabetical order,
definitions for ``basic oxygen process furnace group,'' ``mercury
switch,'' ``motor vehicle,'' ``motor vehicle scrap,'' ``opening,''
``post-consumer steel scrap,'' ``pre-consumer steel scrap,'' ``scrap
provider,'' and ``steel scrap.''

Sec.  63.7852  What definitions apply to this subpart?

* * * * *
    Basic oxygen process furnace group means the collection of BOPF
shop steelmaking operation units including the BOPF primary units (BOPF
emissions from oxygen blow iron refining), BOPF secondary units
(secondary fugitive emissions in the shop from iron charging, tapping,
and auxiliary processes not elsewhere controlled), ladle metallurgy
units, and hot metal transfer, desulfurization and slag skimming units.
* * * * *
    Deviation means any instance in which an affected source subject to
this subpart, or an owner or operator of such a source:
    (1) Fails to meet any requirement or obligation established by this
subpart, including but not limited to any emission limitation
(including operating limits), standard, or operation and maintenance
requirement;
* * * * *
    Mercury switch means each mercury-containing capsule or switch
assembly that is part of a convenience light switch mechanism installed
in a motor vehicle.
    Motor vehicle means an automotive vehicle not operated on rails and
usually operated with rubber tires for use on highways.
    Motor vehicle scrap means post-consumer scrap from discarded
vehicles or automobile bodies, including automobile body hulks that
have been processed through a shredder. Motor vehicle scrap does not
include automobile manufacturing bundles or miscellaneous vehicle
parts, such as wheels, bumpers or other components that do not contain
mercury switches. Motor vehicle scrap typically is not sold separately
but is combined with other steel scrap for sale.
    Opening means any roof monitor, vent, door, window, hole, crack or
other conduit that allows gas to escape to the atmosphere from a BF
casthouse or BOPF shop.
    Post-consumer steel scrap means steel scrap that is composed of
materials made of steel that were purchased by households or by
commercial, industrial, and institutional facilities in their role as
end-users of the product and which can no longer be used for its
intended purpose.
    Pre-consumer steel scrap means steel scrap that is left over from
industrial or manufacturing processes and which is subsequently
recycled as scrap. Other terms used to describe this scrap are new,
home, run-around, prompt-industrial, and return scrap.
* * * * *
    Scrap provider means the company or person (including a broker) who
contracts directly with a steel mill to provide steel scrap. Scrap
processors such as shredder operators or vehicle dismantlers that do
not sell scrap directly to a steel mill are not scrap providers.
* * * * *
    Steel scrap means pre-consumer and post-consumer discarded steel
that is processed by scrap providers for resale (post-consumer) or used
on-site (pre-consumer or run-around scrap from within a facility or
company). Post-consumer steel scrap may or may not contain motor
vehicle scrap, depending on the type of scrap. In regard to motor
vehicle scrap, steel scrap only can be classified as ``scrap that is
likely to contain motor vehicle scrap'' vs. ``scrap that is not likely
to contain motor vehicle scrap,'' as determined by the scrap provider.
* * * * *
0
23. Table 1 to Subpart FFFFF of Part 63 is revised to read as follows:

    Table 1 to Subpart FFFFF of Part 63--Emission and Opacity Limits
 As required in Sec.   63.7790(a), you must comply with each applicable
           emission and opacity limit in the following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      You must comply with each of the
             For . . .                         following . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Each windbox exhaust stream at   You must not cause to be discharged
 an existing sinter plant.           to the atmosphere any gases that
                                     contain particulate matter in
                                     excess of 0.4 lb/ton of product
                                     sinter.
2. Each windbox exhaust stream at   You must not cause to be discharged
 a new sinter plant.                 to the atmosphere any gases that
                                     contain particulate matter in
                                     excess of 0.3 lb/ton of product
                                     sinter.
3. Each discharge end at an         a. You must not cause to be
 existing sinter plant.              discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     gases that exit from one or more
                                     control devices that contain, on a
                                     flow-weighted basis, particulate
                                     matter in excess of 0.02 gr/dscf;
                                     \12\ and
                                    b. You must not cause to be
                                     discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     secondary emissions that exit any
                                     opening in the building or
                                     structure housing the discharge end
                                     that exhibit opacity greater than
                                     20 percent (6-minute average).
4. Each discharge end at a new      a. You must not cause to be
 sinter plant.                       discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     gases that exit from one or more
                                     control devices that contain, on a
                                     flow weighted basis, particulate
                                     matter in excess of 0.01 gr/dscf;
                                     and
                                    b. You must not cause to be
                                     discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     secondary emissions that exit any
                                     opening in the building or
                                     structure housing the discharge end
                                     that exhibit opacity greater than
                                     10 percent (6-minute average).

5. Each sinter cooler at an         You must not cause to be discharged
 existing sinter plant.              to the atmosphere any emissions
                                     that exhibit opacity greater than
                                     10 percent (6-minute average).
6. Each sinter cooler at a new      You must not cause to be discharged
 sinter plant.                       to the atmosphere any gases that
                                     contain particulate matter in
                                     excess of 0.01 gr/dscf.
7. Each casthouse at an existing    a. You must not cause to be
 blast furnace.                      discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     gases that exit from a control
                                     device that contain particulate
                                     matter in excess of 0.01 gr/dscf;
                                     \2\ and
                                    b. You must not cause to be
                                     discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     secondary emissions that exit all
                                     openings in the casthouse or
                                     structure housing the blast furnace
                                     that exhibit opacity greater than
                                     20 percent (6-minute average).
8. Each casthouse at a new blast    a. You must not cause to be
 furnace.                            discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     gases that exit from a control
                                     device that contain particulate
                                     matter in excess of 0.003 gr/dscf;
                                     and
                                    b. You must not cause to be
                                     discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     secondary emissions that exit all
                                     openings in the casthouse or
                                     structure housing the blast furnace
                                     that exhibit opacity greater than
                                     15 percent (6-minute average).
9. Each BOPF at a new or existing   a. You must not cause to be
 shop.                               discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     gases that exit from a primary
                                     emission control system for a BOPF
                                     with a closed hood system at a new
                                     or existing BOPF shop that contain,
                                     on a flow-weighted basis,
                                     particulate matter in excess of
                                     0.03 gr/dscf during the primary
                                     oxygen blow; \23\ and
                                    b. You must not cause to be
                                     discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     gases that exit from a primary
                                     emission control system for a BOPF
                                     with an open hood system that
                                     contain, on a flow-weighted basis,
                                     particulate matter in excess of
                                     0.02 gr/dscf during the steel
                                     production cycle for an existing
                                     BOPF shop \23\ or 0.01 gr/dscf
                                     during the steel production cycle
                                     for a new BOPF shop; \3\ and
                                    c. You must not cause to be
                                     discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     gases that exit from a control
                                     device used solely for the
                                     collection of secondary emissions
                                     from the BOPF that contain
                                     particulate matter in excess of
                                     0.01 gr/dscf for an existing BOPF
                                     shop \2\ or 0.0052 gr/dscf for a
                                     new BOPF shop.
10. Each hot metal transfer,        You must not cause to be discharged
 skimming, and desulfurization       to the atmosphere any gases that
 operation at a new or existing      exit from a control device that
 BOPF shop.                          contain particulate matter in
                                     excess of 0.01 gr/dscf for an
                                     existing BOPF shop \2\ or 0.003 gr/
                                     dscf for a new BOPF shop.
11. Each ladle metallurgy           You must not cause to be discharged
 operation at a new or existing      to the atmosphere any gases that
 BOPF shop.                          exit from a control device that
                                     contain particulate matter in
                                     excess of 0.01 gr/dscf for an
                                     existing BOPF shop \2\ or 0.004 gr/
                                     dscf for a new BOPF shop.
12. Each existing BOPF shop.......  You must not cause to be discharged
                                     to the atmosphere any secondary
                                     emissions that exit any opening in
                                     the BOPF shop or any other building
                                     housing the BOPF or BOPF shop
                                     operation that exhibit opacity
                                     greater than 20 percent (3-minute
                                     average).
13. Each new BOPF shop............  a. You must not cause to be
                                     discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     secondary emissions that exit any
                                     opening in the BOPF shop or other
                                     building housing a bottom-blown
                                     BOPF or BOPF shop operations that
                                     exhibit opacity (for any set of 6-
                                     minute averages) greater than 10
                                     percent, except that one 6-minute
                                     period not to exceed 20 percent may
                                     occur once per steel production
                                     cycle; or
                                    b. You must not cause to be
                                     discharged to the atmosphere any
                                     secondary emissions that exit any
                                     opening in the BOPF shop or other
                                     building housing a top-blown BOPF
                                     or BOPF shop operations that
                                     exhibit opacity (for any set of 3-
                                     minute averages) greater than 10
                                     percent, except that one 3-minute
                                     period greater than 10 percent but
                                     less than 20 percent may occur once
                                     per steel production cycle.
14. Each BOPF Group at an existing  You must not cause to be discharged
 BOPF shop.                          to the atmosphere any gases that
                                     exit from the collection of BOPF
                                     Group control devices that contain
                                     mercury in excess of 0.00026 lb/ton
                                     of steel scrap input to the BOPF.
15. Each BOPF Group at a new BOPF   You must not cause to be discharged
 shop.                               to the atmosphere any gases that
                                     exit from the collection of BOPF
                                     Group control devices that contain
                                     mercury in excess of 0.00008 lb/ton
                                     of steel scrap input to the BOPF.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This limit applies if the cooler is vented to the same control
  device as the discharge end.
\2\ This concentration limit (gr/dscf) for a control device does not
  apply to discharges inside a building or structure housing the
  discharge end at an existing sinter plant, inside a casthouse at an
  existing blast furnace, or inside an existing BOPF shop if the control
  device was installed before August 30, 2005.
\3\ This limit applies to control devices operated in parallel for a
  single BOPF during the oxygen blow.

0
24. Table 2 to Subpart FFFFF of Part 63 is revised to read as follows:

  Table 2 to Subpart FFFFF of Part 63--Initial Compliance With Emission
                           and Opacity Limits
    As required in Sec.   63.7826(a)(1), you must demonstrate initial
    compliance with the emission and opacity limits according to the
                            following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                        You have demonstrated initial
             For . . .                       compliance if . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Each windbox exhaust stream at   The process-weighted mass rate of
 an existing sinter plant.           particulate matter from a windbox
                                     exhaust stream, measured according
                                     to the performance test procedures
                                     in Sec.   63.7822(c), did not
                                     exceed 0.4 lb/ton of product
                                     sinter.
2. Each windbox exhaust stream at   The process-weighted mass rate of
 a new sinter plant.                 particulate matter from a windbox
                                     exhaust stream, measured according
                                     to the performance test procedures
                                     in Sec.   63.7822(c), did not
                                     exceed 0.3 lb/ton of product
                                     sinter.
3. Each discharge end at an         a. The flow-weighted average
 existing sinter plant.              concentration of particulate matter
                                     from one or more control devices
                                     applied to emissions from a
                                     discharge end, measured according
                                     to the performance test procedures
                                     in Sec.   63.7822(d), did not
                                     exceed 0.02 gr/dscf; and

                                    b. The opacity of secondary
                                     emissions from each discharge end,
                                     determined according to the
                                     performance test procedures in Sec.
                                       63.7823(c), did not exceed 20
                                     percent (6-minute average).
4. Each discharge end at a new      a. The flow-weighted average
 sinter plant.                       concentration of particulate matter
                                     from one or more control devices
                                     applied to emissions from a
                                     discharge end, measured according
                                     to the performance test procedures
                                     in Sec.   63.7822(d), did not
                                     exceed 0.01 gr/dscf; and
                                    b. The opacity of secondary
                                     emissions from each discharge end,
                                     determined according to the
                                     performance test procedures in Sec.
                                       63.7823(c), did not exceed 10
                                     percent (6-minute average).
5. Each sinter cooler at an         The opacity of emissions, determined
 existing sinter plant.              according to the performance test
                                     procedures in Sec.   63.7823(e),
                                     did not exceed 10 percent (6-minute
                                     average).
6. Each sinter cooler at a new      The average concentration of
 sinter plant.                       particulate matter, measured
                                     according to the performance test
                                     procedures in Sec.   63.7822(b),
                                     did not exceed 0.01 gr/dscf.
7. Each casthouse at an existing    a. The average concentration of
 blast furnace.                      particulate matter from a control
                                     device applied to emissions from a
                                     casthouse, measured according to
                                     the performance test procedures in
                                     Sec.   63.7822(e), did not exceed
                                     0.01 gr/dscf; and
                                    b. The opacity of secondary
                                     emissions from each casthouse,
                                     determined according to the
                                     performance test procedures in Sec.
                                       63.7823(c), did not exceed 20
                                     percent (6-minute average).
8. Each casthouse at a new blast    a. The average concentration of
 furnace.                            particulate matter from a control
                                     device applied to emissions from a
                                     casthouse, measured according to
                                     the performance test procedures in
                                     Sec.   63.7822(e), did not exceed
                                     0.003 gr/dscf; and
                                    b. The opacity of secondary
                                     emissions from each casthouse,
                                     determined according to the
                                     performance test procedures in Sec.
                                       63.7823(c), did not exceed 15
                                     percent (6-minute average).
9. Each BOPF at a new or existing   a. The average concentration of
 BOPF shop.                          particulate matter from a primary
                                     emission control system applied to
                                     emissions from a BOPF with a closed
                                     hood system, measured according to
                                     the performance test procedures in
                                     Sec.   63.7822(f), did not exceed
                                     0.03 gr/dscf for a new or existing
                                     BOPF shop;
                                    b. The average concentration of
                                     particulate matter from a primary
                                     emission control system applied to
                                     emissions from a BOPF with an open
                                     hood system, measured according to
                                     the performance test procedures in
                                     Sec.   63.7822(g), did not exceed
                                     0.02 gr/dscf for an existing BOPF
                                     shop or 0.01 gr/dscf for a new BOPF
                                     shop; and
                                    c. The average concentration of
                                     particulate matter from a control
                                     device applied solely to secondary
                                     emissions from a BOPF, measured
                                     according to the performance test
                                     procedures in Sec.   63.7822(g),
                                     did not exceed 0.01 gr/dscf for an
                                     existing BOPF shop or 0.0052 gr/
                                     dscf for a new BOPF shop.
10. Each hot metal transfer         The average concentration of
 skimming, and desulfurization at    particulate matter from a control
 a new or existing BOPF shop.        device applied to emissions from
                                     hot metal transfer, skimming, or
                                     desulfurization, measured according
                                     to the performance test procedures
                                     in Sec.   63.7822(h), did not
                                     exceed 0.01 gr/dscf for an existing
                                     BOPF shop or 0.003 gr/dscf for a
                                     new BOPF shop.
11. Each ladle metallurgy           The average concentration of
 operation at a new or existing      particulate matter from a control
 BOPF shop.                          device applied to emissions from a
                                     ladle metallurgy operation,
                                     measured according to the
                                     performance test procedures in Sec.
                                       63.7822(h), did not exceed 0.01
                                     gr/dscf for an existing BOPF shop
                                     or 0.004 gr/dscf for a new BOPF
                                     shop.
12. Each existing BOPF shop.......  The opacity of secondary emissions
                                     from each BOPF shop, determined
                                     according to the performance test
                                     procedures in Sec.   63.7823(d),
                                     did not exceed 20 percent (3-minute
                                     average).
13. Each new BOPF shop............  a. The opacity of the highest set of
                                     6-minute averages from each BOPF
                                     shop housing a bottom-blown BOPF,
                                     determined according to the
                                     performance test procedures in Sec.
                                       63.7823(d), did not exceed 20
                                     percent and the second highest set
                                     of 6-minute averages did not exceed
                                     10 percent; or
                                    b. The opacity of the highest set of
                                     3-minute averages from each BOPF
                                     shop housing a top-blown BOPF,
                                     determined according to the
                                     performance test procedures in Sec.
                                       63.7823(d), did not exceed 20
                                     percent and the second highest set
                                     of 3-minute averages did not exceed
                                     10 percent.
14. Each BOPF Group at an existing  The average emissions of mercury
 BOPF shop.                          from the collection of BOPF Group
                                     control devices applied to the
                                     emissions from the BOPF Group,
                                     measured according to the
                                     performance test procedures in Sec.
                                       63.7825, did not exceed 0.00026
                                     lb/ton steel scrap input to the
                                     BOPF.
15. Each BOPF Group at a new BOPF   The average emissions of mercury
 shop.                               from the collection of BOPF Group
                                     control devices applied to the
                                     emissions from the BOPF Group,
                                     measured according to the
                                     performance test procedures in Sec.
                                       63.7825, did not exceed 0.00008
                                     lb/ton steel scrap input to the
                                     BOPF.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

0
25. Table 3 to Subpart FFFFF of Part 63 is revised to read as follows:

Table 3 to Subpart FFFFF of Part 63--Continuous Compliance With Emission
                           and Opacity Limits
    As required in Sec.   63.7833(a), you must demonstrate continuous
    compliance with the emission and opacity limits according to the
                            following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       You must demonstrate continuous
             For . . .                       compliance by . . .
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Each windbox exhaust stream at   a. Maintaining emissions of
 an existing sinter plant.           particulate matter at or below 0.4
                                     lb/ton of product sinter; and
                                    b. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
2. Each windbox exhaust stream at   a. Maintaining emissions of
 a new sinter plant.                 particulate matter at or below 0.3
                                     lb/ton of product sinter; and
                                    b. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.

3. Each discharge end at an         a. Maintaining emissions of
 existing sinter plant.              particulate matter from one or more
                                     control devices at or below 0.02 gr/
                                     dscf; and
                                    b. Maintaining the opacity of
                                     secondary emissions that exit any
                                     opening in the building or
                                     structure housing the discharge end
                                     at or below 20 percent (6-minute
                                     average); and
                                    c. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
4. Each discharge end at a new      a. Maintaining emissions of
 sinter plant.                       particulate matter from one or more
                                     control devices at or below 0.01 gr/
                                     dscf; and
                                    b. Maintaining the opacity of
                                     secondary emissions that exit any
                                     opening in the building or
                                     structure housing the discharge end
                                     at or below 10 percent (6-minute
                                     average); and
                                    c. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
5. Each sinter cooler at an         a. Maintaining the opacity of
 existing sinter plant.              emissions that exit any sinter
                                     cooler at or below 10 percent (6-
                                     minute average); and
                                    b. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
6. Each sinter cooler at a new      a. Maintaining emissions of
 sinter plant.                       particulate matter at or below 0.1
                                     gr/dscf; and
                                    b. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
7. Each casthouse at an existing    a. Maintaining emissions of
 blast furnace.                      particulate matter from a control
                                     device at or below 0.01 gr/dscf;
                                     and
                                    b. Maintaining the opacity of
                                     secondary emissions that exit all
                                     openings in the casthouse or
                                     structure housing the casthouse at
                                     or below 20 percent (6-minute
                                     average); and
                                    c. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
8. Each casthouse at a new blast    a. Maintaining emissions of
 furnace.                            particulate matter from a control
                                     device at or below 0.003 gr/dscf;
                                     and
                                    b. Maintaining the opacity of
                                     secondary emissions that exit all
                                     openings in the casthouse or
                                     structure housing the casthouse at
                                     or below 15 percent (6-minute
                                     average); and
                                    c. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
9. Each BOPF at a new or existing   a. Maintaining emissions of
 BOPF shop.                          particulate matter from the primary
                                     control system for a BOPF with a
                                     closed hood system at or below 0.03
                                     gr/dscf; and
                                    b. Maintaining emissions of
                                     particulate matter from the primary
                                     control system for a BOPF with an
                                     open hood system at or below 0.02
                                     gr/dscf for an existing BOPF shop
                                     or 0.01 gr/dscf for a new BOPF
                                     shop; and
                                    c. Maintaining emissions of
                                     particulate matter from a control
                                     device applied solely to secondary
                                     emissions from a BOPF at or below
                                     0.01 gr/dscf for an existing BOPF
                                     shop or 0.0052 gr/dscf for a new
                                     BOPF shop; and
                                    d. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
10. Each hot metal transfer,        a. Maintaining emissions of
 skimming, and desulfurization       particulate matter from a control
 operation at a new or existing      device at or below 0.01 gr/dscf at
 BOPF shop.                          an existing BOPF or 0.003 gr/dscf
                                     for a new BOPF; and
                                    b. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
11. Each ladle metallurgy           a. Maintaining emissions of
 operation at a new or existing      particulate matter from a control
 BOPF shop.                          device at or below 0.01 gr/dscf at
                                     an existing BOPF shop or 0.004 gr/
                                     dscf for a new BOPF shop; and
                                    b. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
12. Each existing BOPF shop.......  a. Maintaining the opacity of
                                     secondary emissions that exit any
                                     opening in the BOPF shop or other
                                     building housing the BOPF shop or
                                     shop operation at or below 20
                                     percent (3-minute average); and
                                    b. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
13. Each new BOPF shop............  a. Maintaining the opacity (for any
                                     set of 6-minute averages) of
                                     secondary emissions that exit any
                                     opening in the BOPF shop or other
                                     building housing a bottom-blown
                                     BOPF or shop operation at or below
                                     10 percent, except that one 6-
                                     minute period greater than 10
                                     percent but no more than 20 percent
                                     may occur once per steel production
                                     cycle; and
                                    b. Maintaining the opacity (for any
                                     set of 3-minute averages) of
                                     secondary emissions that exit any
                                     opening in the BOPF shop or other
                                     building housing a top-blown BOPF
                                     or shop operation at or below 10
                                     percent, except that one 3-minute
                                     period greater than 10 percent but
                                     less than 20 percent may occur once
                                     per steel production cycle; and
                                    c. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
14. Each BOPF Group at an existing  a. Maintaining emissions of mercury
 BOPF shop.                          from the collection of BOPF Group
                                     control devices at or below 0.00026
                                     lb/ton steel scrap input to the
                                     BOPF; and
                                    b. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
15. Each BOPF Group at a new BOPF   a. Maintaining emissions of mercury
 shop.                               from the collection of BOPF Group
                                     control devices at or below 0.00008
                                     lb/ton steel scrap input to the
                                     BOPF; and
                                    b. Conducting subsequent performance
                                     tests at the frequencies specified
                                     in Sec.   63.7821.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

0
26. Table 4 to Subpart FFFFF of Part 63 is revised to read as follows:

            Table 4 to Subpart FFFFF of Part 63--Applicability of General Provisions to Subpart FFFFF
  As required in Sec.   63.7850, you must comply with the requirements of the NESHAP General Provisions (40 CFR
                                part 63, subpart A) shown in the following table:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Applies to  subpart
              Citation                       Subject                  FFFFF                  Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec.   63.1........................  Applicability.........  Yes...................
Sec.   63.2........................  Definitions...........  Yes...................
Sec.   63.3........................  Units and               Yes...................
                                      Abbreviations.
Sec.   63.4........................  Prohibited Activities.  Yes...................
Sec.   63.5........................  Construction/           Yes...................
                                      Reconstruction.
Sec.   63.6(a), (b), (c), (d),       Compliance with         Yes...................
 (e)(1)(iii), (f)(2)-(3), (g),        Standards and
 (h)(2)(ii)-(h)(9).                   Maintenance
                                      Requirements.
Sec.   63.6(e)(1)(i)...............  General Duty to         No....................  See Sec.   63.7810(c) for
                                      Minimize Emissions.                             general duty requirement.
Sec.   63.6(e)(1)(ii)..............  Requirement to Correct  No....................
                                      Malfunctions ASAP.
Sec.   63.6(e)(3)..................  SSM Plan Requirements.  No....................
Sec.   63.6(f)(1)..................  SSM Exemption.........  No....................
Sec.   63.6(h)(1)..................  SSM Exemption.........  No....................
Sec.   63.6(h)(2)(i)...............  Determining Compliance  No....................  Subpart FFFFF specifies
                                      with Opacity and VE                             methods and procedures for
                                      Standards.                                      determining compliance
                                                                                with opacity emission and
                                                                                operating limits.
Sec.   63.6(i).....................  Extension of            Yes...................
                                      Compliance with
                                      Emission Standards.
Sec.   63.6(j).....................  Exemption from          Yes...................
                                      Compliance with
                                      Emission Standards.
Sec.   63.7(a)(1)-(2)..............  Applicability and       No....................  Subpart FFFFF and specifies
                                      Performance Test                                performance test
                                      Dates.                                          applicability and dates.
Sec.   63.7(a)(3), (b)-(d), (e)(2)-  Performance Testing     Yes...................
 (4), (f)-(h).                        Requirements.
Sec.   63.7(e)(1)..................  Performance Testing...  No....................  See Sec.  Sec.
                                                                                63.7822(a), 63.7823(a),
                                                                                and 63.7825(a).
Sec.   63.8(a)(1)-(3), (b),          Monitoring              Yes...................  CMS requirements in Sec.
 (c)(1)(ii), (c)(2)-(3), (c)(4)(i)-   Requirements.                                   Sec.   63.8(c)(4)(i)-(ii),
 (ii), (c)(5)-(6), (c)(7)-(8),                                                        (c)(5)-(6), (d)(1)-(2),
 (d)(1)-(2), (e), (f)(1)-(5),                                                         and (e) apply only to
 (g)(1)-(4).                                                                          COMS.
Sec.   63.8(a)(4)..................  Additional Monitoring   No....................  Subpart FFFFF does not
                                      Requirements for                                require flares.
                                      Control Devices in
                                      Sec.   63.11.
Sec.   63.8(c)(1)(i)...............  General Duty to         No....................
                                      Minimize Emissions
                                      and CMS Operation.
Sec.   63.8(c)(1)(iii).............  Requirement to Develop  No....................
                                      SSM Plan for CMS.
Sec.   63.8(c)(4)..................  Continuous Monitoring   No....................  Subpart FFFFF specifies
                                      System Requirements.                            requirements for operation
                                                                                of CMS.
Sec.   63.8(d)(3)..................  Written procedures for  No....................  See Sec.   63.7842(b)(3).
                                      CMS.
Sec.   63.8(f)(6)..................  RATA Alternative......  No....................
Sec.   63.8(g)(5)..................  Data Reduction........  No....................  Subpart FFFFF specifies
                                                                                data reduction
                                                                                requirements.
Sec.   63.9........................  Notification            Yes...................  Additional notifications
                                      Requirements.                                   for CMS in Sec.   63.9(g)
                                                                                apply only to COMS.
Sec.   63.10(a), (b)(1), (b)(2)(x),  Recordkeeping and       Yes...................  Additional records for CMS
 (b)(2)(xiv), (b)(3), (c)(1)-(6),     Reporting                                       in Sec.   63.10(c)(1)-(6),
 (c)(9)-(14), (d)(1)-(4), (e)(1)-     Requirements.                                   (9)-(14), and reports in
 (2), (e)(4), (f).                                                                    Sec.   63.10(d)(1)-(2)
                                                                                apply only to COMS.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(i)..............  Recordkeeping of        No....................
                                      Occurrence and
                                      Duration of Startups
                                      and Shutdowns.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(ii).............  Recordkeeping of        No....................  See Sec.   63.7842(a)(2)-
                                      Failures to Meet a                              (4) for recordkeeping of
                                      Standard.                                       (1) date, time and
                                                                                duration of failure to
                                                                                meet the standard; (2)
                                                                                listing of affected source
                                                                                or equipment, and an
                                                                                estimate of the quantity
                                                                                of each regulated
                                                                                pollutant emitted over the
                                                                                standard; and (3) actions
                                                                                to minimize emissions and
                                                                                correct the failure.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(iii)............  Maintenance Records...  Yes...................
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(iv).............  Actions Taken to        No....................  See Sec.   63.7842(a)(4)
                                      Minimize Emissions                              for records of actions
                                      During SSM.                                     taken to minimize
                                                                                emissions.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(v)..............  Actions Taken to        No....................  See Sec.   63.7842(a)(4)
                                      Minimize Emissions                              for records of actions
                                      During SSM.                                     taken to minimize
                                                                                emissions.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(vi).............  Recordkeeping for CMS   Yes...................
                                      Malfunctions.
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(vii)-(ix).......  Other CMS Requirements  Yes...................
Sec.   63.10(b)(2)(xiii)...........  CMS Records for RATA    No....................
                                      Alternative.
Sec.   63.10(c)(7)-(8).............  Records of Excess       No....................  Subpart FFFFF specifies
                                      Emissions and                                   record requirements; see
                                      Parameter Monitoring                            Sec.   63.7842.
                                      Exceedances for CMS.
Sec.   63.10(c)(15)................  Use of SSM Plan.......  No....................

Sec.   63.10(d)(5)(i)..............  Periodic SSM Reports..  No....................  See Sec.   63.7841(b)(4)
                                                                                for malfunction reporting
                                                                                requirements.
Sec.   63.10(d)(5)(ii).............  Immediate SSM Reports.  No....................
Sec.   63.10(e)(3).................  Excess Emission         No....................  Subpart FFFFF specifies
                                      Reports.                                        reporting requirements;
                                                                                see Sec.   63.7841.
Sec.   63.11.......................  Control Device          No....................  Subpart FFFFF does not
                                      Requirements.                                   require flares.
Sec.   63.12.......................  State Authority and     Yes...................
                                      Delegations.
Sec.   63.13-Sec.   63.16..........  Addresses,              Yes...................
                                      Incorporations by
                                      Reference,
                                      Availability of
                                      Information and
                                      Confidentiality,
                                      Performance Track
                                      Provisions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2019-17349 Filed 8-15-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P