[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 98 (Thursday, May 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29387-29388]
[FR Doc No: 2015-11815]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Delayed Applications

AGENCY: Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT.

ACTION: List of application delayed more than 180 days.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list of special permit applications
that have been in process for 180 days or more. The reason(s) for delay
and the expected completion date for action on each application is
provided in association with each identified application.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Key to ``Reason for Delay''

1. Awaiting additional information from applicant
2. Extensive public comment under review
3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact or
precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis
4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of special
permit applications

Meaning of Application Number Suffixes

N--New application
M--Modification request
R--Renewal Request
P--Party To Exemption Request

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 5, 2015.
Donald Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Estimated
    Application No.         Applicant       Reason for        date of
                                               delay        completion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Modification to Special Permits
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15642-M...............  Praxair                        4      05-22-2015
                         Distribution,
                         Inc., Danbury,
                         CT.
8451-M................  Special Devices,               4      05-30-2015
                         Inc., Mesa, AR.
15393-M...............  Savannah Acid                  3      05-30-2015
                         Plant LLC,
                         Savannah, GA.
7945-M................  Pacific                        4      05-15-2015
                         Scientific
                         Company, Simi
                         Valley, CA.
11903-M...............  Comptank                       4      06-10-2015
                         Corporation,
                         Bothwell, ON.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     New Special Permit Applications
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15767-N...............  Union Pacific                  1      05-20-2015
                         Railroad
                         Company, Omaha,
                         NE.
16001-N...............  Veltek                         4      05-31-2015
                         Associates,
                         Inc., Malvern,
                         PA.
16190-N...............  Digital Wave                   4      05-29-2015
                         Corporation,
                         Centennial, CO.
16198-N...............  Fleischmann's                  4      05-15-2015
                         Vinegar
                         Company, Inc.,
                         Cerritos, CA.
16212-N...............  Entegris, Inc.,                4      05-30-2015
                         Billerica, MA.

16220-N...............  Americase,                     4      05-30-2015
                         Waxahache, TX.
16193-N...............  CH&I                           4      05-29-2015
                         Technologies,
                         Inc., Santa
                         Paula, CA.
16261-N...............  Dexsil                         4      05-13-2015
                         Corporation,
                         Hamden, CT.
16292-N...............  Standard                       4      05-16-2015
                         Technologies,
                         LLC, Fremont,
                         OH.
16238-N...............  Entegris, Inc.,                4      05-20-2015
                         Billerica, MA.
16241-N...............  Linde Gas North,               4      06-19-2015
                         Murray Hill, NJ.
16274-N...............  Matheson Tri-                  4      05-31-2015
                         Gas, Inc.,
                         Longmont, CO.
16232-N...............  Linde Gas, North               1      06-05-2015
                         America LLC,
                         Murray Hill, NJ.
16249-N...............  Optimized                      4      05-30-2015
                         Energy,
                         Solutions, LLC,
                         Durango, CO.
16302-N...............  Ametek Inc.,                   4      05-27-2015
                         Pittsburgh, PA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Party to Special Permits Application
------------------------------------------------------------------------
16279-P...............  Advantra Group,                4      06-15-2015
                         Middleburg
                         Heights, OH.
16279-P...............  MediWaste                      4      06-15-2015
                         Disposal, LLC,
                         Anaheim, CA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  Renewal Special Permits Applications
------------------------------------------------------------------------
11860-R...............  GATX                           1      05-30-2015
                         Corporation,
                         Chicago, IL.
15765-R...............  Delphi                         4      05-15-2015
                         Automotive
                         Systems, LLC,
                         Kokomo, IN.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-11815 Filed 5-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-M


[Federal Register: December 10, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 236)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 69600-69601]
[DOCID:fr10de07-14]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-29031; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-130-AD;
Amendment 39-15284; AD 2007-25-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -
800, and -900 Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series
airplanes. This AD requires repetitive inspections of either the aft
side or forward side of the aft pressure bulkhead for oil can
conditions or bulges, a one-time inspection of the aft pressure
bulkhead to identify any previously installed web repair, and
corrective actions if necessary. This AD results from web oil can
conditions found on the aft pressure bulkhead of several airplanes. We
are issuing this AD to detect and correct oil can conditions, bulges,
or previous repairs in the aft pressure bulkhead, which could lead to
web cracks and consequently result in rapid decompression of the
airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective January 14, 2008.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of January 14,
2008.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
; or in person at the Docket Management Facility

between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Howard Hall, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ANM-120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
917-6430; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to include an AD that would apply to certain Boeing Model
737-600, -700, -700C, -800, and -900 series airplanes. That NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on August 24, 2007 (72 FR 48594).
That NPRM proposed to require repetitive inspections of either the aft
side or forward side of the aft pressure bulkhead for oil can
conditions or bulges, a one-time inspection of the aft pressure
bulkhead to identify any previously installed web repair, and
corrective actions if necessary.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We have considered the two comments received.
Boeing and Continental Airlines support the NPRM.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data, including the
comments received, and determined that air safety and the public
interest require adopting the AD as proposed.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 1,755 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 600 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The required inspection takes about 6 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Based on these figures, the
estimated cost of the AD for U.S. operators is $288,000, or $480 per
airplane, per inspection cycle.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
adding the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

2007-25-03 Boeing: Amendment 39-15284. Docket No. FAA-2007-29031;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-130-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective January 14, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 737-600, -700, -700C, -800,
and -900 series airplanes, certificated in any category; as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1253, dated May
18, 2007.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from web oil can conditions found on the aft
pressure bulkhead of several airplanes. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct oil can conditions, bulges, or previous repairs
in the aft pressure bulkhead, which could lead to web cracks and
consequently result in rapid decompression of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Repetitive Inspections

    (f) At the applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E. of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1253, dated May 18, 2007,
except as provided by paragraph (g) of this AD: Do repetitive
general visual inspections of either the aft side or forward side of
the aft pressure bulkhead for oil can conditions or bulges and a
one-time general visual inspection of the aft pressure bulkhead to
identify any previously installed web repair, and do all applicable
corrective actions, by accomplishing all of the applicable actions
specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1253, dated May 18, 2007, except as provided by
paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD.

Exceptions to Compliance Times

    (g) Where Tables 1 and 2 of paragraph 1.E. of Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 737-53A1253, dated May 18, 2007, specify a
compliance time of ``at or before 15,000 total flight cycles or
within 1,200 flight cycles'' for the general visual inspections,
this AD requires accomplishing the applicable inspection at the
later of those compliance times. Where Tables 1 and 2 of paragraph
1.E. of the service bulletin specify counting the compliance time
from the ``release date of this service bulletin'' or ``after the
date on this service bulletin,'' this AD requires starting the
compliance time from the effective date of this AD. Where Table 2 of
paragraph 1.E. of the service bulletin specifies to determine the
FAA-approved, follow-on inspection procedures, thresholds, and
repeat intervals and to incorporate them into the airplane
maintenance program within 12 months after accomplishing the
inspection given in Section 53-80-08-2R of the Boeing 737-600/700/
700C/800/900 Structural Repair Manuals (SRMs), this AD requires that
those corrective actions, if applicable, be done within 12 months
after accomplishing the one-time general visual inspection of the
aft pressure bulkhead for any previously installed web repair as
required by paragraph (f) of this AD.

Exceptions to Corrective Actions

    (h) If any crack or bulge is found during any inspection
required by paragraph (f) of this AD and Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 737-53A1253, dated May 18, 2007, specifies to contact
Boeing for repair instructions, before further flight, repair
according to a method approved by the Manager, Seattle Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA, or according to data meeting the
certification basis of the airplane approved by an Authorized
Representative for the Boeing Delegation Option Authorization
Organization who has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to
make those findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair
must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD. If a previously installed aft
pressure bulkhead web repair is found during any inspection required
by paragraph (f) of this AD, and the FAA-approved supplemental
inspection program cannot be determined from either the Boeing 737-
600/700/700C/800/900 SRMs or the service bulletin, and the service
bulletin specifies to contact Boeing for further instructions,
within 12 months after accomplishing the inspection contact the
Manager, SACO, or an Authorized Representative for the Boeing
Commercial Airplanes Delegation Option Authorization Organization to
develop a supplemental inspection program.

No Reporting Requirement

    (i) Although Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1253, dated
May 18, 2007, specifies to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not require that action.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (j)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested in accordance with the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD, if it is approved by an
Authorized Representative for the Boeing Commercial Airplanes
Delegation Option Authorization Organization who has been authorized
by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those findings. For a repair
method to be approved, the repair must meet the certification basis
of the airplane and 14 CFR 25.571, Amendment 45, and the approval
must specifically refer to this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (k) You must use Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 737-53A1253,
dated May 18, 2007, to perform the actions that are required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. The Director of the Federal
Register approved the incorporation by reference of this document in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207,
for a copy of this service information. You may review copies at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington; or at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html
.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 23, 2007.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E7-23458 Filed 12-7-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 141 (Tuesday, July 23, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 35430-35431]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [http://www.gpo.gov/]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15635]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86408; File No. SR-IEX-2019-06]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to IEX's Fee
Schedule To Correct Two Fee Code Combinations

July 18, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on July 15, 2019, the Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,\4\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\5\ IEX is filing with the Commission a
proposed rule change to modify its Fee Schedule, pursuant to IEX Rule
15.110(a) and (c), to correct two minor Fee Code combination to conform
each to the applicable fee. The Exchange proposes to implement the
change immediately upon filing, pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of
the Act.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
website at http://www.iextrading.com/, at the principal office of the Exchange,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statement may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to modify its Fee Schedule, pursuant to IEX
Rule 15.110(a) and (c), to correct two minor Fee Code combination
descriptions to conform each to the applicable fee. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to change the words ``non-displayed'' to
``displayed'' in the descriptions of fee codes LSN and LSQN. As
discussed below, neither descriptive error had any impact on IEX
Members because the applicable fees were correctly applied.
    Effective July 1, 2018, IEX modified the structure of its Fee
Schedule in order to provide more clarity to market participants
regarding the fees assessed for executions on the Exchange (``Fee
Schedule Update'').\7\ Among other changes, the Fee Schedule Update
added a table of all possible Fee Code combinations, a description of
each combination, and the applicable fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83582 (July 2, 2018)
83 FR 31828 (July 9, 2018) (SR-IEX-2018-11).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange recently identified that the descriptions for the LSN
and LSQN Fee Code combinations are inaccurate. Each description
incorrectly states that the execution involves removing non-displayed
liquidity rather than displayed liquidity.\8\ As described in the Fee
Schedule Update, IEX uses a Fee Code of ``L'' to designate executions
that provide or take resting interest with displayed priority, and a
Fee Code of ``I'' to designate executions that provide or take resting
interest with non-displayed priority.\9\ Thus, Fee Code ``L'' is
accurately defined in the Fee Schedule as relating to the adding or
removing of displayed liquidity, and a Fee Code combination that
includes ``L'' should reference displayed liquidity. Notwithstanding
these errors, the table correctly specifies that both Fee Code
combinations are free of charge.\10\ This is because each includes Fee
Code ``S'' pursuant to which a Member's order that executes against
resting liquidity provided by the same Member is free of charge.\11\
Thus, although the Fee Code descriptions for LSN and LSQN inaccurately
state that they apply to removal of non-displayed interest, IEX has
correctly billed all executions pursuant to each Fee Code
combination.\12\ In addition, Fee Code combinations ISN and ISQN apply
to an execution in which a Member removes non-displayed liquidity
provided with a spread-crossing eligible order or a Member removes non-
displayed liquidity provided by such Member during periods of quote
instability with a spread-crossing eligible order, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The IEX Fee Schedule currently describes Fee Code LSN as
``Member removes non-displayed liquidity provided by such Member
with a spread-crossing eligible order'' and Fee Code LSQN as
``Member removes non-displayed liquidity provided by such Member
during periods of quote instability with a spread-crossing eligible
order.''
    \9\ See Fee Schedule Update, Note 7, at 5.
    \10\ Under some circumstances, executions that receive the LSQN
Fee Code combination are not free to the liquidity remover.
Specifically, executions that include Fee Code ``Q'' are subject to
footnote 1 of the Fee Schedule which specifies when the Crumbling
Quote Remove Fee identified in the Fee Code Modifiers table applies.
    \11\ Id.
    \12\ Notably, other lines in the Fee Code Combinations and
Associated Fees table correctly indicate that Fee Code combinations
containing Fee Code ``L'' apply to the removal of displayed
liquidity. See, e.g., Fee Codes LS, LQ, LN, and LSQ.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to correct the IEX Fee Schedule
to reflect that Fee Codes LSN and LSQN apply to the removal of
displayed liquidity, not non-displayed liquidity.
    IEX notes, as suggested by the May 21, 2019 Staff Guidance on SRO
Rule Filings Relating to Fees (``Guidance''),\13\ that these proposed
corrections to the descriptions of two Fee Codes do not involve any new
or changed fees, because IEX will continue to charge Members no fee for
executions that remove displayed liquidity from the same Member with a
spread-crossing eligible order. Additionally, IEX is not proposing any
new product, service, or fee change. While, the Guidance does not
suggest that IEX provide an analysis of any impact this proposal will
have on market participants, IEX notes that this proposed rule change
will have no impact on market participants because it merely corrects
descriptive text in the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Staff Guidance on SRO Rule Filings Relating to Fees
(May 21, 2019) available at https://www.sec.gov/tm/staff-guidance-sro-rule-filings-fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    IEX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 6(b) \14\ of the Act in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section

6(b)(5) of the Act \15\ [sic] in particular, in that it is designed to
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other
charges among its Members and other persons using its facilities. The
Exchange believes that it is consistent with the Act to correct the Fee
Schedule so that the Fee Schedule is accurate, avoiding any potential
confusion among Members. The Exchange further believes that the
correction to the Fee Schedule is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory because all Members will be subject to the same
fee structure.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As described in the Purpose section above, this proposed rule
change does not change any fees charged by IEX, but rather corrects
inaccurate descriptions of two Fee Code combinations. Thus, the
proposed fee change will provide clarity to market participants
regarding the meaning of Fee Codes LSN and LSQN, therefore making the
Exchange's Fee Schedule clearer and more deterministic to the benefit
of all market participants.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intermarket or intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is designed to correct an inadvertent error rather
than a competitive issue.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) \16\ of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \17\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File No. SR-IEX-2019-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-IEX-2019-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File No. SR-IEX-2019-06, and should be submitted on or
before August 13, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-15635 Filed 7-22-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 30 (Monday, February 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 8291-8293]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3003]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30767; Amdt. No. 3412]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new

obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements. These changes are
designed to provide safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace
and to promote safe flight operations under instrument flight rules at
the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective February 14, 2011. The compliance date
for each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of February 14, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit http://www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs Divisions,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition
to their complex nature and the need for a special format make
publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical.
Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on
charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of
the associated Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also
identifies the airport and its location, the procedure, and the
amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less than 30
days. For the remaining SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in
less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule '' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979); and
(3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 4, 2011.
John McGraw,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
Little Rock, AR, Adams Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 1
Show Low, AZ, Show Low Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 1
Titusville, FL, Arthur Dunn Air Park, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 2
Atlanta, GA, Atlanta Rgnl Falcon Field, ILS OR LOC RWY 31, Amdt 1

Atlanta, GA, Atlanta Rgnl Falcon Field, NDB RWY 31, Amdt 2
Atlanta, GA, Atlanta Rgnl Falcon Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 1
Atlanta, GA, Atlanta Rgnl Falcon Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1A
Atlanta, GA, Atlanta Rgnl Falcon Field, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Algona, IA, Algona Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4
Ankeny, IA, Ankeny Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 1
Davenport, IA, Davenport Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY 15, Amdt 1
Davenport, IA, Davenport Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Amdt 1
Davenport, IA, Davenport Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 2
Davenport, IA, Davenport Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 21 Amdt 1
Davenport, IA, Davenport Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Amdt 1
Moline, IL, Quad City Intl., LOC RWY 10, Orig
Moline, IL, Quad City Intl., RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig
Moline, IL, Quad City Intl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
French Lick, IN, French Lick Muni, GPS RWY 26, Orig-A, CANCELLED
French Lick, IN, French Lick Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Amdt 1
French Lick, IN, French Lick Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Orig
Winchester, IN, Randolph County, GPS RWY 25, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Winchester, IN, Randolph County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Orig
Winchester, IN, Randolph County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Orig
Winchester, IN, Randolph County, VOR-A, Amdt 9
El Dorado, KS, Captain Jack Thomas/El Dorado, GPS RWY 4, Orig,
CANCELLED
El Dorado, KS, Captain Jack Thomas/El Dorado, GPS RWY 15, Orig,
CANCELLED
El Dorado, KS, Captain Jack Thomas/El Dorado, GPS RWY 22, Orig,
CANCELLED
El Dorado, KS, Captain Jack Thomas/El Dorado, GPS RWY 33, Orig-B,
CANCELLED
El Dorado, KS, Captain Jack Thomas/El Dorado, NDB RWY 4, Amdt 3,
CANCELLED
El Dorado, KS, Captain Jack Thomas/El Dorado, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig
El Dorado, KS, Captain Jack Thomas/El Dorado, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15,
Orig
El Dorado, KS, Captain Jack Thomas/El Dorado, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22,
Orig
El Dorado, KS, Captain Jack Thomas/El Dorado, RNAV (GPS) RWY 33,
Orig
Marysville, KS, Marysville Muni, NDB RWY 34, Amdt 5
Marysville, KS, Marysville Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Orig
Marysville, KS, Marysville Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, Orig
Shreveport, LA, Shreveport Downtown, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 3A
Ely, MN, Ely Muni, VOR-A, Orig, CANCELLED
Paynesville, MN, Paynesville Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 11, Orig
Paynesville, MN, Paynesville Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Orig
Kansas City, MO, Kansas City Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 1L, Amdt 14
Mountain View, MO, Mountain View, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 4
Potosi, MO, Washington County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Amdt 1
Potosi, MO, Washington County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1
Wilmington, NC, Wilmington Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 35, Amdt 21
Bismarck, ND, Bismarck Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
8
Berlin, NH, Berlin Rgnl, VOR-B, Amdt 3
Columbus, OH, Ohio State University, ILS OR LOC RWY 9R, Amdt 5
Hamilton, OH, Butler Co Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
4
Tulsa, OK, Richard Lloyd Jones Jr., Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 7
John Day, OR, Grant Co Rgnl/Ogilvie Field, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 9, Orig-
A
Rapid City, SD, Rapid City Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 7
Anahuac, TX, Chambers County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Brownsville, TX, Brownsville/South Padre Island Intl, VOR/DME RNAV
OR GPS RWY 17, Amdt 3A, CANCELLED
Coleman, TX, Coleman Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Dallas, TX, Dallas Love Field, RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 13L, Orig-B
Midlothian/Waxahachie, TX, Mid-Way Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig
Midlothian/Waxahachie, TX, Mid-Way Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Mineola, TX, Mineola Wisener Field, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Orig
Wink, TX, Winkler County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig-A
Amery, WI, Amery Muni, NDB RWY 18, Amdt 6A, CANCELLED
Williamson, WV, Mingo County Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Orig, CANCELLED

[FR Doc. 2011-3003 Filed 2-11-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 108 (Monday, June 6, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32362-32364]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13442]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2011-N-0279]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Reports and Records Under Prescription Drug Marketing Act of 1987

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the Agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal Agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an existing collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements contained in the regulations implementing
the Prescription Drug Marketing Act of 1987 (PDMA).

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the collection
of information by August 5, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management, Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr.,
P150-400B, Rockville, MD 20850,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
Agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes Agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal Agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, including
each proposed extension of an existing collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with
this requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection
of information set forth in this document.
    With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.

Prescription Drug Marketing Act of 1987; Administrative Procedures,
Policies, and Requirements--21 CFR Part 203 (OMB Control Number 0910-
0435)--Extension

    FDA is requesting OMB approval under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520)
for the reporting and recordkeeping requirements contained in the
regulations implementing the Prescription Drug Marketing Act of 1987
(PDMA) (Public Law 100-293). PDMA was intended to ensure that drug
products purchased by consumers are safe and effective and to avoid an
unacceptable risk that counterfeit, adulterated, misbranded, subpotent,
or expired drugs are sold.

    PDMA was enacted by Congress because there were insufficient
safeguards in the drug distribution system to prevent the introduction
and retail sale of substandard, ineffective, or counterfeit drugs, and
that a wholesale drug diversion submarket had developed that prevented
effective control over the true sources of drugs.
    Congress found that large amounts of drugs had been reimported into
the United States as U.S. goods returned causing a health and safety
risk to U.S. consumers because the drugs may become subpotent or
adulterated during foreign handling and shipping. Congress also found
that a ready market for prescription drug reimports had been the
catalyst for a continuing series of frauds against U.S. manufacturers
and had provided the cover for the importation of foreign counterfeit
drugs.
    Congress also determined that the system of providing drug samples
to physicians through manufacturers' representatives had resulted in
the sale to consumers of misbranded, expired, and adulterated
pharmaceuticals.
    The bulk resale of below-wholesale priced prescription drugs by
health care entities for ultimate sale at retail also helped to fuel
the diversion market and was an unfair form of competition to
wholesalers and retailers who had to pay otherwise prevailing market
prices.
    FDA is requesting OMB approval for the following reporting and
recordkeeping requirements:

                     Table 1--Reporting Requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 CFR 203.11.....................  Applications for reimportation to
                                     provide emergency medical care.
21 CFR 203.30(a)(1) and (b).......  Drug sample requests (drug samples
                                     distributed by mail or common
                                     carrier).
21 CFR 203.30(a)(3), (a)(4), and    Drug sample receipts (receipts for
 (c).                                drug samples distributed by mail or
                                     common carrier).
21 CFR 203.31(a)(1) and (b).......  Drug sample requests (drug samples
                                     distributed by means other than the
                                     mail or a common carrier).
21 CFR 203.31(a)(3), (a)(4), and    Drug sample receipts (drug samples
 (c).                                distributed by means other than the
                                     mail or a common carrier).
21 CFR 203.37(a)..................  Investigation of falsification of
                                     drug sample records.
21 CFR 203.37(b)..................  Investigation of a significant loss
                                     or known theft of drug samples.
21 CFR 203.37(c)..................  Notification that a representative
                                     has been convicted of certain
                                     offenses involving drug samples.
21 CFR 203.37(d)..................  Notification of the individual
                                     responsible for responding to a
                                     request for information about drug
                                     samples.
21 CFR 203.39(g)..................  Preparation by a charitable
                                     institution of a reconciliation
                                     report for donated drug samples.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

                   Table 2--Recordkeeping Requirements
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 CFR 203.23(a) and (b)..........  Credit memo for returned drugs.
21 CFR 203.23(c)..................  Documentation of proper storage,
                                     handling, and shipping conditions
                                     for returned drugs.
21 CFR 203.30(a)(2) and             Verification that a practitioner
 203.31(a)(2).                       requesting a drug sample is
                                     licensed or authorized by the
                                     appropriate State authority to
                                     prescribe the product.
21 CFR 203.31(d)(1) and (d)(2)....  Contents of the inventory record and
                                     reconciliation report required for
                                     drug samples distributed by
                                     representatives.
21 CFR 203.31(d)(4)...............  Investigation of apparent
                                     discrepancies and significant
                                     losses revealed through the
                                     reconciliation report.
21 CFR 203.31(e)..................  Lists of manufacturers' and
                                     distributors' representatives.
21 CFR 203.34.....................  Written policies and procedures
                                     describing administrative systems.
21 CFR 203.37(a)..................  Report of investigation of
                                     falsification of drug sample
                                     records.
21 CFR 203.37(b)..................  Report of investigation of
                                     significant loss or known theft of
                                     drug samples.
21 CFR 203.38(b)..................  Records of drug sample distribution
                                     identifying lot or control numbers
                                     of samples distributed. (The
                                     information collection in 21 CFR
                                     203.38(b) is already approved under
                                     OMB Control Number 0910-0139).
21 CFR 203.39(d)..................  Records of drug samples destroyed or
                                     returned by a charitable
                                     institution.
21 CFR 203.39(e)..................  Record of drug samples donated to a
                                     charitable institution.
21 CFR 203.39(f)..................  Records of donation and distribution
                                     or other disposition of donated
                                     drug samples.
21 CFR 203.39(g)..................  Inventory and reconciliation of drug
                                     samples donated to charitable
                                     institutions.
21 CFR 203.50(a)..................  Drug origin statement.
21 CFR 203.50(b)..................  Retention of drug origin statement
                                     for 3 years.
21 CFR 203.50(d)..................  List of authorized distributors of
                                     record.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The reporting and recordkeeping requirements are intended to help
achieve the following goals: (1) To ban the reimportation of
prescription drugs produced in the United States, except when
reimported by the manufacturer or under FDA authorization for emergency
medical care; (2) to ban the sale, purchase, or trade, or the offer to
sell, purchase, or trade, of any prescription drug sample; (3) to limit
the distribution of drug samples to practitioners licensed or
authorized to prescribe such drugs or to pharmacies of hospitals or
other health care entities at the request of a licensed or authorized
practitioner; (4) to require licensed or authorized practitioners to
request prescription drug samples in writing; (5) to mandate storage,
handling, and recordkeeping requirements for prescription drug samples;
(6) to prohibit, with certain exceptions, the sale, purchase, or trade
of, or the offer to sell, purchase, or trade, prescription drugs that
were purchased by hospitals or other health care entities, or which
were donated or supplied at a reduced price to a charitable
organization; (7) to require unauthorized wholesale distributors to
provide, prior to the wholesale distribution of a prescription drug to
another wholesale distributor or

retail pharmacy, a statement identifying each prior sale, purchase, or
trade of the drug.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                  Table 3--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      Number of                    Average burden
          21 CFR section              Number of     responses per   Total annual    per response    Total hours
                                     respondents     respondent       responses    (in hours) \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
203.11...........................               1               1               1           30/60            .50
203.30(a)(1) and (b).............          61,961              12         743,532            4/60      44,612
203.30(a)(3), (a)(4), and (c)....          61,961              12         743,532            4/60      44,612
203.31(a)(1) and (b).............         232,355             135      31,367,925            2/60   1,254,717
203.31(a)(3), (a)(4), and (c)....         232,355             135      31,367,925            2/60     941,038
203.37(a)........................              50               4             200           15/60          50
203.37(b)........................              50              40           2,000           15/60         500
203.37(c)........................               1               1               1               1           1
203.37(d)........................              50               1              50            5/60           4
203.39(g)........................               1               1               1               1           1
                                  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total........................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............   2,285,535.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.
\2\ Burden estimates of less than 1 hour are expressed as a fraction of an hour in the format ``[number of
  minutes per response]/60''.

                                Table 4--Estimated Annual Recordkeeping Burden\1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Average burden
                                     Number of       Number of     Total annual         per
         21 CFR section            recordkeepers    records per       records      recordkeeping    Total hours
                                                   recordkeeper                   (in hours) \2\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
203.23(a) and (b)...............          31,676               5         158,380           15/60          39,595
203.23(c).......................          31,676               5         158,380            5/60          12,670
203.30(a)(2) and 203.31(a)(2)...           2,208             100         220,800           30/60         110,400
203.31(d)(1) and (d)(2).........           2,208               1           2,208              40          88,320
203.31(d)(4)....................             442               1             442              24          10,608
203.31(e).......................           2,208               1           2,208               1           2,208
203.34..........................              90               1              90              40           3,600
203.37(a).......................              50               4             200               6           1,200
203.37(b).......................              50              40           2,000               6           1,200
203.39(d).......................              65               1              65               1              65
203.39(e).......................           3,221               1           3,221           30/60           1,610
203.39(f).......................           3,221               1           3,221               8          25,768
203.39(g).......................           3,221               1           3,221               8          25,768
203.50(a).......................             125             100          12,500           10/60           2,125
203.50(b).......................             125             100          12,500           30/60           6,250
203.50(d).......................             691               1             691               2           1,382
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total.......................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............         332,769
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
\2\ Burden estimates of less than 1 hour are expressed as a fraction of an hour in the format ``[number of
  minutes per response]/60''.

    Dated: May 24, 2011.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-13442 Filed 6-3-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 30 (Wednesday, February 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10827-10828]
[FR Doc No: 2017-02996]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-80002; File No. SR-NYSE-2016-45]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Designation of Longer Period for Commission Action on
Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1-4, To Amend the Co-
Location Services Offered by the Exchange To Add Certain Access and
Connectivity Fees

February 9, 2017.
    On July 29, 2016, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to (1) provide additional information regarding
access to various NYSE trading and execution services and establish
fees for connectivity to certain NYSE market data feeds; and (2)
provide and establish fees for connectivity to data feeds from third
party markets and other content service providers; access to the
trading and execution services of Third Party markets and other content
service providers; connectivity to Depository Trust & Clearing
Corporation services; connectivity to third party testing and
certification feeds; and the use of virtual control circuits by Users
in the Data Center.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission published the proposed rule change for comment in
the Federal Register on August 17, 2016.\3\ The Exchange filed
Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change on August 16, 2016.\4\ The
Commission

published Amendment No. 1 for comment in the Federal Register on
September 26, 2016.\5\ The Commission received one comment in response
to the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1, to which
the Exchange responded.\6\ On October 4, 2016, the Commission extended
the time period within which to approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change to
November 15, 2016.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-78556 (August 11,
2016), 81 FR 54877.
    \4\ Amendment No. 1 (i) amended the third party data feed MSCI
from 20 Gigabits (``Gb'') to 25 Gb and amended the price from $2000
to $1200; (ii) clarified the costs associated with providing a
greater amount of bandwidth for Premium NYSE Data Products for a
particular market as compared to the bandwidth requirements for the
Included Data Products for that same market; (iii) provided further
details on Premium NYSE Data Products, including their composition,
product release dates, and further detail on the reasonableness of
their applicable fees; (iv) added an explanation for the varying fee
differences for the same Gb usage for third party data feeds, DTCC,
and Virtual Control Circuit.
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-78887 (September
20, 2016), 81 FR 66095.
    \6\ See letter to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, from
John Ramsay, Chief Market Policy Officer, Investors Exchange LLC
(``IEX Letter I''), dated September 9, 2016.
     On September 23, 2016, the NYSE submitted a response to the IEX
letter (``Response Letter I'') which is available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2016-45/nyse201645-3.pdf.
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-78966 (September
28, 2016), 81 FR 68475.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 2, 2016, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the
proposed rule change.\8\ On November 21, 2016, the Commission
instituted proceedings to determine whether to approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2.\9\
Following the Order Instituting Proceedings, the Commission received
several additional comment letters.\10\ On December 9, 2016, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 3 to the proposed rule change.\11\
Amendment No. 3, which supersedes and replaces the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, in its entirety, was
published for comment in the Federal Register on December 29, 2016.\12\
On January 17, 2017, the Exchange responded to the comment letters
submitted after the OIP and prior to January 17, 2017.\13\ On February
7, 2017, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 4 to the proposed rule
change.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Amendment No. 2 is available on the Commission's Web site at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2016-45/nyse201645-4.pdf.
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release 34-79316 (November 15,
2016), 81 FR 83303.
    \10\ See letter to Brent J. Fields, Commission, from Adam C.
Cooper, Senior Managing Director and Chief Legal Officer, Citadel
Securities, dated December 12, 2016 (``Citadel Letter''); letter to
Brent J. Fields, Commission, from Melissa MacGregor, Managing
Director and Associate General Counsel, SIFMA, dated December 12,
2016 (``SIFMA Letter I''); letter to Brent J. Fields, Commission,
from Joe Wald, Chief Executive Officer, Clearpool Group, dated
December 16, 2016 (``Clearpool Letter''); letter to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Commission, from John Ramsay, Chief Market Policy
Officer, Investors Exchange LLC (IEX), dated December 21, 2016
(``IEX Letter II''); letter to Brent J. Fields, Commission, from
David L. Cavicke, Chief Legal Officer, Wolverine LLC (``Wolverine
Letter''); letter to Bent J. Fields, Secretary, Commission, from
Stefano Durdic, Managing Director, R2G Services, LLC, dated January
21, 2017 (``R2G Letter''); letter to Brent J. Fields, Commission,
from Melissa MacGregor, Managing Director and Associate General
Counsel, SIFMA, dated February 6, 2017 (``SIFMA Letter II''). All
comments received by the Commission on the proposed rule change are
available on the Commission's Web site at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2016-45/nyse201645.shtml.
    \11\ Amendment No. 3, as filed by the Exchange, is available at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2016-45/nyse201645-5.pdf.
    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 34-79674 (December
22, 2016), 81 FR 96053 (``Notice of Current Proposal'').
    \13\ See NYSE Response Letter II (``Response Letter II''),
available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2016-45/nyse201645-1502013-130586.pdf. The R2G and SIFMA II Letters, supra
note 10, were submitted after the Response Letter II.
    \14\ Amendment No. 4, as filed by the Exchange, is available at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nyse-2016-45/nyse201645-1570711-131690.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act\15\ provides that, after initiating
proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the
date of publication of notice of the filing of the proposed rule
change. The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not
more than 60 days if the Commission determines that a longer period is
appropriate and publishes the reasons for such determination. The
proposed rule change was published for notice and comment in the
Federal Register on August 17, 2016.\16\ February 13, 2017 is 180 days
from that date, and April 14, 2017 is an additional 60 days from that
date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \16\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 1-4, the issues raised in
the comment letters that have been submitted in connection therewith,
and the Exchange's response to the comments.
    Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\17\ designates April 14, 2017 as the date by which the Commission
should either approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendments Nos. 1-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-02996 Filed 2-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51552-51554]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24127]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0490; Product Identifier 2017-NE-13-AD; Amendment
39-19082; AD 2017-22-02]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; IPECO Pilot and Co-Pilot Seats

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Ipeco Holdings Ltd. (Ipeco) pilot and co-pilot seats. This AD requires
modification and reidentification of the affected seats. This AD was
prompted by reports of unexpected movement of pilot and co-pilot seats
on takeoff and landing. We are issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective December 12, 2017.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 12,
2017.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Ipeco Holdings Ltd., Aviation Way, Southend on Sea, SS2 6UN,
United Kingdom; phone: 44 1702 549371; fax: 44 1702 540782; email:
[email protected]. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available on the Internet at
http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2017-0490.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-
0490; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the mandatory continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The address for the Docket Office (phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Neil Doh, Aerospace Engineer, Boston
ACO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803; phone:
781-238-7757; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to the specified products. The
NPRM was published in the Federal Register on June 16, 2017 (82 FR
27629). The NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    Occurrences have been reported of pilot/co-pilot unexpected
rearward movement during take-off and landing. Investigations
determined that horizontal guide block wear, presence of burrs on
horizontal centre track, and horizontal track lock system weakness
(spring tension too low) were various causes which contributed to
the seat not being correctly locked.
    This condition, if not corrected, could lead to further cases of
unwanted flight crew seat movement, possibly resulting in reduced
control of the aeroplane.

    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2017-0490.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Shorten Compliance Time

    The Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) requested that the FAA work
with EASA to reevaluate the compliance time for this AD. ALPA indicated
that the requirements of this AD could be accomplished in a shorter
timeframe that would enhance safety.
    ALPA did not provide data or a detailed explanation with respect to
its request for a shorter time frame. Consequently, upon further review
of the risk analysis with EASA, we determined the proposed time frame
for accomplishment of this AD is appropriate.

Miscellaneous Comments

    We received miscellaneous comments not relevant to this AD. No
further response is required.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD as proposed.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Ipeco has issued Service Bulletin (SB) Number 063-25-08, Revision
00; SB Number 063-25-09, Revision 00; and SB Number 063-25-10, Revision
00; all dated May 31, 2016. These SBs provide instructions,
differentiated by the part numbers of the affected pilot and co-pilot
seats, for the modification and reidentification of these seats. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects an unknown number of pilot and co-
pilot seats installed on 55 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
               Action                         Labor cost            Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Modify crew seats..................  2 work-hours x $85 per hour            $125            $295         $16,225
                                      = $170.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2017-22-02 Ipeco Holdings Ltd.: Amendment 39-19082; Docket No. FAA-
2017-0490; Product Identifier 2017-NE-13-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective December 12, 2017.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to Ipeco Holdings Ltd. (Ipeco) pilot and co-
pilot seats with a part number listed in the Planning Information
section of Ipeco Service Bulletins (SBs) Number 063-25-08, Revision
00; Number 063-25-09, Revision 00; and Number 063-25-10, Revision
00; all dated May 31, 2016.
    (2) These seats are installed on, but not limited to, ATR-GIE
Avions de Transport Regional ATR 42 and ATR 72 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 2510, Flight
Compartment Equipment.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of unexpected movement of pilot
and co-pilot seats on takeoff and landing. We are issuing this AD to
prevent unexpected movement of pilot and co-pilot seats on takeoff
and landing. The unsafe condition, if not corrected, could result in
reduced control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    (1) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
    (2) Within 2 years after the effective date of this AD, modify
and re-identify affected each pilot and co-pilot seat. Use the
Accomplishment Instructions of Ipeco SB Number 063-25-08, Revision
00; Ipeco SB 063-25-09, Revision 00; or Ipeco SB 063-25-10, Revision
00; all dated May 31, 2016; as appropriate, to do the modification
and reidentification.

(g) Installation Prohibition

    Do not install any pilot or co-pilot seat identified in
paragraph (c) of this AD unless the seat is modified and
reidentified as specified in paragraph (f)(2) of this AD.

(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Boston ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the Boston ACO Branch, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(i) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Neil Doh,
Aerospace Engineer, Boston ACO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].
    (2) Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2016-0256,
dated December 16, 2016, for more information. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-2017-0490.

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Ipeco Service Bulletin (SB) Number 063-25-08, Revision 00;
dated May 31, 2016.
    (ii) Ipeco SB Number 063-25-09, Revision 00; dated May 31, 2016.

    (iii) Ipeco SB Number 063-25-10, Revision 00; dated May 31,
2016.
    (3) For Ipeco service information identified in this AD, contact
Ipeco Holdings Ltd., Aviation Way, Southend on Sea, SS2 6UN, United
Kingdom; phone: 44 1702 549371; fax: 44 1702 540782; email:
[email protected].
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Engine and
Propeller Standards Branch, Policy and Innovation Division, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on October 19, 2017.
Karen M. Grant,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2017-24127 Filed 11-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Meeting Log

Includes all face-to-face meetings between EPA personnel and stakeholders following signature of the RFS Renewable Identification Number (RIN) Quality Assurance Program Proposed Rule (78 FR 12158, February 21, 2013).

Date:  2/27/2013 Location:   Ann Arbor, MI and Washington, D.C. via video and phone call-in EPA attendees:

John Weihrauch (DC), Mary Manners (Ann Arbor), Michael Prince (Ann Arbor), Brent Williams (Ann Arbor), Jeff Kodish (Denver), Tony Miller (DC)

Stakeholder attendees and affiliation:

Michael Whitney, General Manager, Musket Corporation Tyson Redpath, Russell Group

Topics/issues/agenda: Musket Corporation initiated the meeting to discuss the proposed rule, specifically the components of QAP A and the proposed exporter provisions.

Date:   Location:  EPA attendees:

Stakeholder attendees and affiliation:

Topics/issues/agenda: