[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62785-62787]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24645]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-70644; File No. SR-Topaz-2013-06]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Topaz Exchange, LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Related to
Market Maker Risk Parameters

October 9, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on September 30, 2013, the Topaz Exchange, LLC (d/b/a ISE Gemini)
(the ``Exchange'' or ``Topaz'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which items have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes changes to mitigate market maker risk by
requiring market makers to enter values in the Exchange-provided risk
parameters.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Internet Web site at http://www.ise.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries,
set forth in Sections A, B and C below, of the most significant aspects
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, Proposed Rule Change

 1. Purpose
    Pursuant to Topaz Rule 804, the Exchange currently provides
functionality that will automatically remove a market maker's quotes in
all series of an options class when certain parameter settings are
triggered. Specifically, there are four parameters that can be set by
market makers on a class-by-class basis. These parameters are available
for market maker quotes in single options series. Market makers
establish a time frame during which the system calculates: (1) the
number of contracts executed by the market maker in an options class;
(2) the percentage of the total size of the market maker's quotes in
the class that has been executed; (3) the absolute value of the net
between contracts bought and contracts sold in an options class; and
(4) the absolute value of the net between (a) calls purchased plus puts
sold, and (b) calls sold plus puts purchased. The market maker
establishes limits for each of these four parameters, and when the
limits are exceeded within the prescribed time frame, the market makers
quotes are removed.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange is proposing certain non-substantive changes to
the text of Rule 804 for clarity. The changes shorten the first
sentence in Rule 804 by deleting ``if the market maker trades, in
the aggregate across all series of an options class during a
specified time period'' and to delete ``(established by the market
maker), within a time frame specified by the market maker'' as the
text might be confusing in its current form and is redundant with
other text within the Rule. To assure clarity, the Exchange also
proposes to specify that the first parameter is a number of
``total'' contracts ``in the class,'' and to specify that the fourth
parameter is a net value based on puts and calls purchased and sold
``in the class.'' Finally, the Exchange proposes to use a uniform
construction of ``the specified . . .'' for each of the four
parameters. The Exchange is not proposing to alter the operation of
the functionality, other than to make use of the parameters
mandatory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of this functionality is to allow market makers to
provide liquidity across potentially hundreds of options series without
being at risk of executing the full cumulative size of all such quotes
before being given adequate opportunity to adjust their quotes. For
example, if a market maker can enter quotes with a size of 20 contracts
in 150 series of an options class, its total potential exposure is 3000
contracts in the options class. To mitigate the risk of executing all
3000 contracts without evaluating its positions, the market maker risk
functionality will automatically remove its quotes in all series of the
options class after it has executed a specified number of contracts
(e.g., 100) in series of that options class during a specified time
period (e.g., 5 seconds).
    To assure that all quotations are firm for their full size, the
parameter calculations occur after an execution against a market
maker's quote takes place. For example, if a market maker has set a
parameter of 100 contracts during a 5 second interval for an options
class, and has executed a total of 95 contracts in the options class
within the previous 3 seconds, a quote in a series of that class with a
size of 20 contracts continues to be firm for all 20 contracts. In this
example, an incoming order could execute all 20 contracts of the quote,
and following the execution, the total size parameter would add 20
contracts to the running total of 95. Since the total size executed
within the 5 second time frame exceeds the 100 contracts established by
the market maker for the options class, all of the market maker's
quotes in the options class would be removed. The market maker would
then enter new quotes in the class.
    Use of these risk management tools is voluntary under the rules.
Similarly, from a technical perspective, market makers currently do not
need to enter

any values into the applicable fields, and thus effectively can choose
not to use these tools. The Exchange proposes to amend the rule to make
it mandatory for market makers to enter values into all four of the
quotation risk management parameters for all options classes in which
it enters quotes. The purpose of the rule change is to prevent market
makers from inadvertently entering quotes without risk-management
parameters. In this respect, the Exchange notes that all Topaz market
makers currently use the parameters when entering quotes.\4\ However,
it is possible that a market maker could inadvertently enter quotes
without populating one or more of the risk parameters, resulting in the
member being exposed to much more risk than it intended. Accordingly,
at the request of Topaz market makers, the Exchange proposes to modify
the trading system to reject quotes if there are any missing risk
management values for the options class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange notes that with the exception of one market
maker, all Topaz market makers are currently also market makers on
the International Securities Exchange (``ISE'') and ISE recently
amended its rules to make it mandatory for market makers to enter
values into all four risk management parameters for classes in which
ISE market makers enter quotes. Topaz market makers are therefore
accustomed to using these risk parameters because they are required
to use them when trading on ISE. The Exchange therefore does not
believe the proposed rule change will have any impact on the way
members currently trade on the Exchange. Additionally, the Exchange
will provide notice to members before making use of the parameters
mandatory.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While entering values into the quotation risk parameters will be
mandatory to prevent an inadvertent exposure to risk, the Exchange
notes that market makers who prefer to use their own risk-management
systems can enter values that assure the Exchange-provided parameters
will not be triggered.\5\ Accordingly, the proposal does not require
members to manage their risk using the Exchange-provided tools.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For example, a market maker could set the value for the
total number of contracts executed in a class at a level that
exceeds the total number of contracts the market maker actually
quotes in an options class.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') \6\ in
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \7\
in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism
for a free and open market and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that requiring market makers to enter values
into the risk parameters provided by the Exchange will not be
unreasonably burdensome, as all Topaz market makers currently utilize
the functionality. Moreover, the Exchange is proposing this rule change
at the request of its market makers to reduce their risk of
inadvertently entering quotes without populating the risk parameters.
As discussed above, the Exchange will be modifying the trading system
to automatically reject quotations unless the parameters are populated
with values, which will protect market makers from inadvertent exposure
to excessive risk. Reducing such risk will enable market makers to
enter quotations with larger size, which in turn will benefit investor
through increased liquidity for the execution of their orders. Such
increased liquidity benefits investors because they receive better
prices and because it lowers volatility in the options market.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The proposed rule change does not impose any burden on competition.
This proposal is based on a recently approved rule change by the
International Securities Exchange, LLC (``ISE'') and is identical to
the ISE proposal.\8\ The proposed rule change to make it mandatory for
market makers to populate the quotation risk management parameters is
being made at the request of Topaz market makers to prevent the
inadvertent entry of quotes without risk-management parameters. Market
makers who prefer to use their own risk-management systems can enter
out-of-range values so that the Exchange-provided parameters will not
be triggered. Accordingly, the proposal does not require members to
manage their risk using an Exchange-provided tool.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70132 (August 7,
2013), 78 FR 49311 (August 13, 2013) (SR-ISE-2013-38).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited, and does not intend to solicit,
comments on this proposed rule change. The Exchange has not received
any unsolicited written comments from members or other interested
parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange believes that the foregoing proposed rule change may
take effect upon filing with the Commission pursuant to
Section19(b)(3)(A) \9\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder \10\
because the foregoing proposed rule change does not (i) significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest, (ii) impose
any significant burden on competition, and (iii) become operative for
30 days after its filing date, or such shorter time as the Commission
may designate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Topaz-2013-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Topaz-2013-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your

comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission
will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the Commission, and all written
communications relating to the proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from
the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the ISE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-Topaz-2013-06 and should be submitted on or before
November 12, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24645 Filed 10-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 39 (Wednesday, March 1, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12218-12219]
[FR Doc No: 2017-03924]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER17-772-001.

    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Amended Order No. 825 Compliance
Filing to be effective 5/11/2017.
    Filed Date: 2/23/17.
    Accession Number: 20170223-5064.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/16/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1013-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2017-02-22_SA 2998 Exelon-
MISO ENRIS (J371) to be effective 2/6/2017.
    Filed Date: 2/22/17.
    Accession Number: 20170222-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/15/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1014-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., Otter
Tail Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2017-02-22_Revisions to
Otter Tail Attachment O and 30.9 Credit to include Basin to be
effective 5/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 2/22/17.
    Accession Number: 20170222-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/15/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1015-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SPS-RBEC-GSEC-Statford Sub-
651-NOC to be effective 2/24/2017.
    Filed Date: 2/23/17.
    Accession Number: 20170223-5023.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/16/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1016-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to OATT Sch 12--
Appendix re: BGE Abandonment Cost Recovery to be effective 5/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 2/23/17.
    Accession Number: 20170223-5026.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/16/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1017-000.
    Applicants: Smoky Mountain Transmission LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Smoky Mountain Transmission LLC
Amendment to Proforma to be effective 2/24/2017.
    Filed Date: 2/23/17.
    Accession Number: 20170223-5063.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 3/16/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: February 23, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-03924 Filed 2-28-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P