From:
"Cornelius, Jay"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Wed, 19 Oct 2022 09:02:30
To:
"Mcginn; Kevin"<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Coke ICR2<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Shappley, Ned<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Howanitz, Jason<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: ABC Coke - Air Monitor Locations - Rev 2

Mr. McGinn,

Attached are the wind roses for Q4 2021 and Q1 2022 which were used by our consultant to locate the monitors.  Please let me know if you need additional information.

Regards,

Jay Cornelius
Manager  -  Environmental Control

Office:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
<<ABC Coke Wind Rose 2021 Q4.pdf>>
<<ABC Coke Wind Rose 2022 Q1.pdf>>

From: Mcginn, Kevin<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2022 7:33 AM
To: Cornelius, Jay<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: ABC Coke - Air Monitor Locations - Rev 2

Jay,

Would it be possible to get the wind rose that was discussed in the test plan, " Siting includes both fenceline sampling locations and interior sampling locations. Fenceline locations were selected as either upwind or downwind of the CBRP and Batteries, based on the predominant seasonal wind direction (wind rose) for October to December 2021 and January to March 2022. Both wind roses showed a predominantly west wind direction, which places the upwind sample locations near the west fenceline and the downwind sample locations near the east fenceline." I want to make sure the revised sample locations meet the downwind objectives. That would help me immensely in making a quick decision. Thank you.

Kevin McGinn
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
OAR/OAQPS/SPPD
Measurement Policy Group
Ph:<PHONE_NUMBER>
he/him/his

-----Original Message-----
From: Cornelius, Jay<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2022 7:17 PM
To<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Mcginn, Kevin<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Shappley, Ned<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: ABC Coke - Air Monitor Locations - Rev 2

Good evening,

The contractor's technicians came on site today to install the air monitors. When attempting to place two of the high volume monitors (TO-13A), they realized the large monitors will not fit at proposed locations F1 or F2.

We have proposed new locations F3 and F4 (see attached) which provide adequate space to safely place the monitors without them interfering with the roadway and still be in the same wind direction. The fenceline monitor locations will remain the same.

If possible, we request approval rather quickly as we plan to start sampling Thursday evening/Friday morning.

Regards,

Jay Cornelius
Environmental Manager
ABC Coke, A Division of Drummond


[Federal Register: October 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 209)]
[Notices]
[Page 66805-66806]
[DOCID:fr29oc10-134]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy,
Washington, DC 20549-0213.
Existing Collection in Use Without an OMB Number: Rule 8c-1; SEC File
No. 270-455; OMB Control No. 3235-0514.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for Approval.
    Rule 8c-1 (17 CFR 240.8c-1) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) generally prohibits a broker-dealer from
using its customers' securities as collateral to finance its own
trading, speculating, or underwriting transactions. More specifically,
the rule states three main principles: first, that a broker-dealer is
prohibited from commingling the securities of different customers as
collateral for a loan without the consent of each customer; second,
that a broker-dealer cannot commingle customers' securities with its
own securities under the same pledge; and third, that a broker-dealer
can only pledge its customers' securities to the extent that customers
are in debt to the broker-dealer. See Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 2690 (November 15, 1940); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 9428
(December 29, 1971). Pursuant to Rule 8c-1, respondents must collect
information necessary to prevent the hypothecation of customer accounts
in contravention of the rule, issue and retain copies of notices to the
pledgee of hypothecation of customer accounts in accordance with the
rule, and collect written consents from customers in accordance with
the rule. The information is necessary to ensure compliance with the
rule, and to advise customers of the rule's protections.
    There are approximately 111 respondents per year (i.e., broker-
dealers that conducted business with the public, filed Part II of the
FOCUS Report, did not claim an exemption from the Reserve Formula
computation, and reported that they had a bank loan during at least one
quarter of the current year) that require an aggregate total of 2,498
hours to comply with the rule. Each of these approximately 111

registered broker-dealers makes an estimated 45 annual responses, for
an aggregate total of 4,995 responses per year. Each response takes
approximately 0.5 hours to complete. Thus, the total compliance burden
per year is 2,498 burden hours. The approximate cost per hour is $59,
resulting in a total cost of compliance for the respondents of
approximately $147,382 (2,498 hours @ $59 per hour).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
    Please direct your written comments to: Jeffrey Heslop, Acting
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or
send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: October 25, 2010.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-27366 Filed 10-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 163 (Wednesday, August 24, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 51873-51876]
[FR Doc No: 2022-18222]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 31443; Amdt. No. 4022]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule amends, suspends, or removes Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports. These
regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or revised
criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National Airspace
System, such as the commissioning of new navigational facilities,
adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements. These
changes are designed to provide for the safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective August 24, 2022. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of August 24, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matter incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:

For Examination

    1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Ops-M30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, West Bldg., Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001;
    2. The FAA Air Traffic Organization Service Area in which the
affected airport is located;
    3. The office of Aeronautical Information Services, 6500 South
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA).
    For information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected] or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

Availability

    All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available online free
of charge. Visit the National Flight Data Center online at nfdc.faa.gov
to register. Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP
copies may be obtained from the FAA Air Traffic Organization Service
Area in which the affected airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas J. Nichols, Flight Procedures
and Airspace Group, Flight Technologies and Procedures Division, Flight
Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration. Mailing Address:
FAA Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, Flight Procedures and Airspace
Group, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Registry Bldg. 29, Room 104,
Oklahoma City, OK 73169. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends 14 CFR part 97 by amending
the referenced SIAPs. The complete regulatory description of each SIAP
is listed on the appropriate FAA Form 8260, as modified by the National
Flight Data Center (NFDC)/Permanent Notice to Airmen (P-NOTAM), and is
incorporated by reference under 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14
CFR 97.20. The large number of SIAPs, their complex nature, and the
need for a special format make their verbatim publication in the
Federal Register expensive and impractical. Further, airmen do not use
the regulatory text of the SIAPs, but refer to their graphic depiction
on charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. Thus, the
advantages of incorporation by reference are realized and publication
of the complete description of each SIAP contained on FAA form
documents is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections, and specifies the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs with
their applicable effective dates. This amendment also identifies the
airport and its location, the procedure and the amendment number.

Availability and Summary of Material Incorporated by Reference

    The material incorporated by reference is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section.
    The material incorporated by reference describes SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs as identified in the amendatory language for Part 97
of this final rule.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as amended in the
transmittal. For safety and timeliness of change considerations, this
amendment incorporates only specific changes contained for each SIAP
and Takeoff Minimums and ODP as modified by FDC permanent NOTAMs.
    The SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, as modified by FDC
permanent NOTAM, and contained in this amendment are based on criteria
contained in the U.S. Standard for Terminal Instrument Procedures
(TERPS). In developing these changes to SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied only to specific conditions
existing at the affected airports. All SIAP amendments in this rule
have been previously issued by the FAA in a FDC NOTAM as an emergency
action of immediate flight safety relating directly to published
aeronautical charts.
    The circumstances that created the need for these SIAP and Takeoff
Minimums and ODP amendments require making them effective in less than
30 days.
    Because of the close and immediate relationship between these
SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find
that notice and public procedure under 5 U.S.C. 553(b) are
impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d), good cause exists for making these
SIAPs effective in less than 30 days.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 5, 2022.
Thomas J. Nichols,
Aviation Safety, Flight Standards Service, Manager, Standards Section,
Flight Procedures & Airspace Group, Flight Technologies & Procedures
Division.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
CFR part 97, (is amended by amending Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, effective at 0901 UTC on the
dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for Part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114,
40120, 44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:
    By amending: Sec.  97.23 VOR, VOR/DME, VOR or TACAN, and VOR/DME or
TACAN; Sec.  97.25 LOC, LOC/DME, LDA, LDA/DME, SDF, SDF/DME; Sec.
97.27 NDB, NDB/DME; Sec.  97.29 ILS, ILS/DME, MLS, MLS/DME, MLS/RNAV;
Sec.  97.31 RADAR SIAPs; Sec.  97.33 RNAV SIAPs; and Sec.  97.35 COPTER
SIAPs, Identified as follows:

* * * Effective Upon Publication

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      AIRAC date           State              City                 Airport          FDC No.      FDC date                      Subject
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8-Sep-22.............  SD             Madison.............  Madison Muni........       2/0006      7/12/22  This NOTAM, published in Docket No. 31441,
                                                                                Amdt No. 4020, TL 22-19, (87 FR 48087,
                                                                                August 8, 2022) is hereby rescinded in its
                                                                                entirety.

8-Sep-22.............  AR             Magnolia............  Ralph C Weiser Fld..       2/0078      7/13/22  This NOTAM, published in Docket No. 31441,
                                                                                Amdt No. 4020, TL 22-19, (87 FR 48087,
                                                                                August 8, 2022) is hereby rescinded in its
                                                                                entirety.
8-Sep-22.............  AR             Magnolia............  Ralph C Weiser Fld..       2/0079      7/13/22  This NOTAM, published in Docket No. 31441,
                                                                                Amdt No. 4020, TL 22-19, (87 FR 48087,
                                                                                August 8, 2022) is hereby rescinded in its
                                                                                entirety.
8-Sep-22.............  IA             Des Moines..........  Des Moines Intl.....       2/4423      4/28/22  This NOTAM, published in Docket No. 31441,
                                                                                Amdt No. 4020, TL 22-19, (87 FR 48087,
                                                                                August 8, 2022) is hereby rescinded in its
                                                                                entirety.
8-Sep-22.............  ID             Burley..............  Burley Muni.........       2/5029      4/19/22  This NOTAM, published in Docket No. 31441,
                                                                                Amdt No. 4020, TL 22-19, (87 FR 48087,
                                                                                August 8, 2022) is hereby rescinded in its
                                                                                entirety.
8-Sep-22.............  NJ             Cross Keys..........  Cross Keys..........       2/8232      5/23/22  This NOTAM, published in Docket No. 31441,
                                                                                Amdt No. 4020, TL 22-19, (87 FR 48087,
                                                                                August 8, 2022) is hereby rescinded in its
                                                                                entirety.
8-Sep-22.............  MD             Baltimore...........  Baltimore/Washington       2/8314      5/23/22  This NOTAM, published in Docket No. 31441,
                                                             Intl Thurgood                                   Amdt No. 4020, TL 22-19, (87 FR 48087,
                                                             Marshall.                                       August 8, 2022) is hereby rescinded in its
                                                                                entirety.
8-Sep-22.............  MD             Baltimore...........  Baltimore/Washington       2/0410      7/28/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 10, ILS RWY 10 (SA CAT I),
                                                             Intl Thurgood                                   ILS RWY 10 (CAT II & CAT III), Amdt 21C.
                                                             Marshall.
8-Sep-22.............  NJ             Trenton.............  Trenton Mercer......       2/1070      7/21/22  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 6, Orig-D.
8-Sep-22.............  IL             Chicago/Aurora......  Aurora Muni.........       2/1100      7/20/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 27, Amdt 1B.
8-Sep-22.............  WY             Big Piney...........  Miley Meml Fld......       2/2347      7/21/22  VOR RWY 31, Amdt 3E.
8-Sep-22.............  CT             New Haven...........  Tweed/New Haven.....       2/2776      7/22/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Amdt 1.
8-Sep-22.............  CT             New Haven...........  Tweed/New Haven.....       2/2779      7/22/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 2, Amdt 18.
8-Sep-22.............  MI             South Haven.........  South Haven Area           2/3064      7/25/22  Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 4.
                                                             Rgnl.
8-Sep-22.............  MD             Baltimore...........  Baltimore/Washington       2/3413      7/28/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 33L, ILS RWY 33L (SA CAT I-
                                                             Intl Thurgood                                   II), Amdt 12A.
                                                             Marshall.
8-Sep-22.............  MN             Appleton............  Appleton Muni.......       2/3551      7/19/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Orig-A.
8-Sep-22.............  AK             St Mary's...........  St Mary's...........       2/4436      7/25/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 3D.
8-Sep-22.............  PR             Aguadilla...........  Rafael Hernandez....       2/6013      7/21/22  Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig.
8-Sep-22.............  CO             Montrose............  Montrose Rgnl.......       2/6275      7/22/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Orig-C.
8-Sep-22.............  CO             Montrose............  Montrose Rgnl.......       2/6282      7/22/22  VOR RWY 13, Amdt 9C.
8-Sep-22.............  FL             Lakeland............  Lakeland Linder Intl       2/6473      7/22/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig-G.
8-Sep-22.............  MA             Bedford.............  Laurence G Hanscom         2/6477      7/22/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Amdt 1.
                                                             Fld.
8-Sep-22.............  TX             Marfa...............  Marfa Muni..........       2/6533      7/21/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Orig-B.
8-Sep-22.............  TX             Marfa...............  Marfa Muni..........       2/6535      7/21/22  VOR RWY 31, Amdt 6B.
8-Sep-22.............  TX             Pearsall............  McKinley Fld........       2/6716      7/26/22  VOR/DME OR GPS-A, Amdt 2C.
8-Sep-22.............  MO             Warrensburg.........  Skyhaven............       2/7294      7/22/22  Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2.
8-Sep-22.............  SD             Madison.............  Madison Muni........       2/7303      7/25/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Orig-B.
8-Sep-22.............  CA             Bishop..............  Bishop..............       2/7491      7/26/22  RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 12, Orig-E.
8-Sep-22.............  OR             Albany..............  Albany Muni.........       2/7819      7/27/22  VOR-A, Amdt 5.
8-Sep-22.............  WY             Laramie.............  Laramie Rgnl........       2/8007      7/18/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 12, Orig-A.
8-Sep-22.............  MD             Easton..............  Easton/Newnam Fld...       2/8111      7/26/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 4, Amdt 2C.
8-Sep-22.............  AK             Wrangell............  Wrangell............       2/8164      7/25/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig-A.
8-Sep-22.............  SD             Britton.............  Britton Muni........       2/8405      7/26/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 1B.
8-Sep-22.............  SD             Britton.............  Britton Muni........       2/8406      7/26/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1B.
8-Sep-22.............  MP             Saipan Island.......  Francisco C Ada/           2/8429      7/25/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Amdt 1.
                                                             Saipan Intl.
8-Sep-22.............  PA             Titusville..........  Titusville..........       2/8458      7/20/22  Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig.
8-Sep-22.............  CA             Bishop..............  Bishop..............       2/8688      7/26/22  RNAV (GPS) Z RWY 12, Orig-E.
8-Sep-22.............  WY             Cowley/Lovell/Byron.  North Big Horn             2/8848      7/25/22  Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2.
                                                             County.
8-Sep-22.............  CO             Pueblo..............  Pueblo Meml.........       2/8884      6/15/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 26L, Amdt 1A.
8-Sep-22.............  CO             Pueblo..............  Pueblo Meml.........       2/8886      6/15/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 8R, Amdt 1C.
8-Sep-22.............  CO             Pueblo..............  Pueblo Meml.........       2/8888      6/15/22  VOR RWY 26L, Amdt 1.

8-Sep-22.............  CO             Pueblo..............  Pueblo Meml.........       2/8889      6/15/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Orig-B.
8-Sep-22.............  CO             Pueblo..............  Pueblo Meml.........       2/8891      6/15/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Orig-A.
8-Sep-22.............  CO             Pueblo..............  Pueblo Meml.........       2/8892      7/25/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 8R, Amdt 1A.
8-Sep-22.............  CO             Pueblo..............  Pueblo Meml.........       2/8893      6/15/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 26L, Amdt 1.
8-Sep-22.............  MT             Anaconda............  Bowman Fld..........       2/9223      7/25/22  VOR/DME OR GPS-A, Amdt 1A.
8-Sep-22.............  GA             Americus............  Jimmy Carter Rgnl...       2/9511      7/27/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 23, Amdt 1D.
8-Sep-22.............  NJ             Trenton.............  Trenton Mercer......       2/9704      7/20/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 6, Amdt 10E.
8-Sep-22.............  IL             Chicago/Aurora......  Aurora Muni.........       2/9919      7/20/22  ILS OR LOC RWY 9, Amdt 4.
8-Sep-22.............  IL             Chicago/Aurora......  Aurora Muni.........       2/9925      7/20/22  LOC RWY 33, Amdt 1.
8-Sep-22.............  IL             Chicago/Aurora......  Aurora Muni.........       2/9928      7/20/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 9, Amdt 2.
8-Sep-22.............  IL             Chicago/Aurora......  Aurora Muni.........       2/9929      7/20/22  VOR RWY 36, Amdt 3A.
8-Sep-22.............  IL             Chicago/Aurora......  Aurora Muni.........       2/9944      7/20/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 1.
8-Sep-22.............  IL             Chicago/Aurora......  Aurora Muni.........       2/9948      7/20/22  RNAV (GPS) RWY 33, Amdt 1A.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2022-18222 Filed 8-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 117 (Monday, June 18, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 28222]
[FR Doc No: 2018-12941]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP18-494-000]

Notice of Request Under Blanket Authorization; Southern Natural
Gas Company, L.L.C.

    Take notice that on June 1, 2018, Southern Natural Gas Company,
L.L.C. (Southern), 569 Brookwood Village, Suite 749, Birmingham,
Alabama 35209, filed in Docket No. CP18-494-000 a prior notice request
pursuant to sections 157.205 and 157.216(b) of the Commission's
regulations under the Natural Gas Act (NGA), requesting authorization
to abandon in place 6.5 miles of both its 4-inch West Point Line and 8-
inch West Point Loop Line from Milepost 16.43 to Milepost 22.79 located
in Lowndes and Clay Counties, Mississippi. In addition, Southern
proposes to abandon by removal its delivery meter at Milepost 16.43, a
regulator at Milepost 19.35, and all associated above-ground
appurtenances. Southern estimates the cost of the proposed project to
be approximately $20,700,000, all as more fully set forth in the
application which is on file with the Commission and open to public
inspection. The filing may also be viewed on the web at http://www.ferc.gov using the eLibrary link. Enter the docket number excluding
the last three digits in the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, please contact FERC Online Support at
[email protected] or toll free at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or TTY,
contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to Pamela
R. Donaldson, Sr. Regulatory Analyst II at Southern Natural Gas
Company, L.L.C., Colonial Brookwood Center, 569 Brookwood Village,
Suite 749, Birmingham, Alabama 35209, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
or by email at [email protected].
    Any person or the Commission's staff may, within 60 days after
issuance of the instant notice by the Commission, file pursuant to Rule
214 of the Commission's Procedural Rules (18 CFR 385.214) a motion to
intervene or notice of intervention and pursuant to section 157.205 of
the regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.205), a protest to the
request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed therefore, the
proposed activity shall be deemed to be authorized effective the day
after the time allowed for filing a protest. If a protest is filed and
not withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed time for filing a
protest, the instant request shall be treated as an application for
authorization pursuant to section 7 of the NGA.
    Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission's rules, 18 CFR 157.9,
within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either:
Complete its environmental assessment (EA) and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the EA for this proposal. The filing of the EA in the Commission's
public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and
state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary
reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations
within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff's EA.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commenter's will be
placed on the Commissions' environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commenters' will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentary, will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at
http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426.

    Dated: June 11, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-12941 Filed 6-15-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 6, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 150)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 39243-39247]
[DOCID:fr06au09-14]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0707; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-035-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Air Tractor, Inc. Models AT-802 and AT-
802A Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2006-08-
09, which applies to all Air Tractor, Inc. (Air Tractor) Models AT-802
and AT-802A airplanes. AD 2006-08-09 currently requires you to
repetitively inspect (using the eddy current method) the two outboard
fastener holes in both of the wing main spar lower caps at the center
splice joint for cracks and repair or replace any cracked spar cap.
Since we issued AD 2006-08-09, we have determined we need to clarify
the applicability of Models AT-802 and AT-802A airplanes affected
serial number (SN) ranges. Additionally, we propose to add an option of
modifying the wing main spar lower caps to extend the safe life limit
on the affected airplanes. Consequently, this proposed AD would keep
the actions of AD 2006-08-09, clarify the applicability of Models AT-
802 and AT-802A affected SN ranges, and add a modification option to
extend the safe life limit. We are proposing this AD to detect and
correct cracks in the wing main spar lower cap at the center splice
joint, which could result in failure of the spar cap and lead to wing
separation and loss of control of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by September 21,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact Air
Tractor, Inc., P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374; telephone: (940) 564-
5616; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet:
http://www.airtractor.com.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andy McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer, ASW-
150, FAA San Antonio MIDO-43, 10100 Reunion Pl., Ste. 650, San Antonio,
Texas 78216; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number, ``FAA-
2009-0707; Directorate Identifier 2009-CE-035-AD'' at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall
regulatory, economic, environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed
AD. We will consider all comments received by the closing date and may
amend the proposed AD in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive concerning this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Since 2000, we have issued several airworthiness directives (ADs)
related to the wing spar inspection and safe life on Air Tractor AT-
400, AT-500, AT-600, and AT-800 series airplanes.
    In 2001, we issued AD 2001-10-04, Amendment 39-12230 (66 FR 27014,
May 16, 2001) to lower the safe life for the wing lower spar cap on Air
Tractor AT-400, AT-500, and AT-800 series airplanes. This AD allowed
for inspection (using eddy current methods) of the wing lower spar cap
for airplanes that were at or over the lower safe life and for which
parts were not available. Later that same year we revised that AD to
remove AT-800 series airplanes from the applicability that were
equipped with the factory-supplied computerized fire gate (part number
80540) and engaged in full-time firefighting.
    In 2002, we issued AD 2002-11-05, Amendment 39-12766 (67 FR 37967,
May 31, 2002) to further reduce the safe life for certain AT-400 series
airplanes and certain AT-500 series airplanes that either incorporate
or have incorporated Marburger winglets.
    After receiving reports of fatigue cracking found on three Model
AT-802A airplanes that were below the reduced safe life established in
AD 2002-11-05, we issued AD 2006-08-09, Amendment 39-14565 (71 FR
27784, May 12, 2006). AD 2006-08-09 currently requires the following on
Air Tractor Models AT-802 and AT-802A airplanes:
     Repetitively inspecting (using the eddy current method)
the two outboard fastener holes in both of the wing main spar lower
caps at the center splice joint for cracks; and
     Repairing or replacing any cracked spar cap.
    Since we issued AD 2006-08-09, we have determined we need to
clarify the applicability of Models AT-802 and AT-802A airplanes
affected SN ranges. The manufacturer, Air Tractor, shared a common SN
range for the Models AT-802 and AT-802A. Sometimes service information
listed only one of the models with a starting or ending SN within an SN
range, depending on which model was produced with that specific SN,
even though the service information applied to both models.
    Additionally, we propose to add an option of modifying the wing
main spar

lower caps to extend the safe life limit on the affected airplanes.
    This condition, if not corrected, could result in failure of the
spar cap and lead to wing separation and loss of control of the
airplane.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed the following Snow Engineering Co. service
information:
     Process Specification 197, page 1, revised June
4, 2002; pages 2 through 4, dated February 23, 2001; and page 5, dated
May 3, 2002;
     Process Specification 204, Rev. C, dated November
16, 2004;
     Service Letter 215, page 5, titled ``802 Spar
Inspection Holes and Vent Tube Mod,'' dated November 19, 2003;
     Service Letter 240, dated September 30, 2004;
     Service Letter 244, dated April 25, 2005;
     Drawing Number 20975, Sheet 2, Rev. A, dated September 1,
2004;
     Drawing Number 20975, Sheet 3, dated January 6, 2005; and
     Drawing Number 20995, Sheet 2, Rev. C., dated September
28, 2004.
    The service information describes procedures for:
     Repetitively inspecting (using the eddy current method)
the two outboard fastener holes in both of the wing main spar lower
caps at the center splice joint for cracks; and
     Repairing or replacing any cracked spar cap.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We are proposing this AD because we evaluated all information and
determined the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist
or develop on other products of the same type design. This proposed AD
would supersede AD 2006-08-09 with a new AD that would incorporate the
actions in the previously-referenced service information. This proposed
AD would require you to use the service information described
previously to perform these actions.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and the Service Information

    Sometimes service information lists only one of the models with a
starting or ending SN within an SN range, depending on which of those
models was produced with that SN, even though the service information
applies to both models. The requirements of this proposed AD, if
adopted as a final rule, would take precedence over the provisions in
the service information.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 187 airplanes in the
U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to do the proposed inspection:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total cost on U.S.
              Labor cost                      Parts cost        Total cost per airplane         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
$500 to $800.........................  Not applicable.........  $500 to $800...........  $93,500 to $149,600.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We estimate the following costs to do any necessary repairs for
two spars that may be required based on the results of the proposed
inspection or the modification as an option. We have no way of
determining the number of airplanes that may need this repair:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Total cost
                                                 Parts cost  (two spars)
            Labor cost (two spars)              (two spars)      per
                                                               airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
225 work-hours x $80 per hour = $18,000.......       $7,500      $25,500
------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We estimate the following costs to do any necessary spar cap
replacement (two spars) that would be required based on the results of
the proposed inspection. We have no way of determining the number of
airplanes that may need this replacement:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Total cost
                                                 Parts cost  (two spars)
            Labor cost (two spars)              (two spars)      per
                                                               airplane
------------------------------------------------------------------------
495 work-hours x $80 per hour = $39,600.......      $39,100      $78,700
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket that contains the proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>)
is located at the street address stated in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2006-08-09, Amendment 39-14565 (71 FR 27784, May 12, 2006), and
adding the following new AD:

Air Tractor, Inc.: Docket No. FAA-2009-0707; Directorate Identifier
2009-CE-035-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) action by September 21, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-08-09, Amendment 39-14565.

Applicability

    (c) This AD affects Model AT-802 and AT-802A airplanes, all
serial numbers (SNs) beginning with -0001, that are:
    (1) Certificated in any category;
    (2) Engaged in agricultural dispersal operations, including
those airplanes that have been converted from fire fighting to
agricultural dispersal or airplanes that convert between fire
fighting and agricultural dispersal;
    (3) Not equipped with the factory-supplied computerized fire
gate (part number (P/N) 80540); and
    (4) Not engaged in only full-time fire fighting.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from our determination that we need to
clarify the applicability of Models AT-802 and AT-802A airplanes
affected serial number (SN) ranges. Additionally, we are adding an
option to modify the wing main spar lower caps to extend the safe
life limit on the affected airplanes. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct cracks in the wing main spar lower cap at the
center splice joint, which could result in failure of the spar cap
and lead to wing separation and loss of control of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) For Models AT-802 and AT-802A airplanes, SNs -0001 through -
0091, do the following actions, unless already done, using the wing
main spar lower cap hours time-in-service (TIS) schedule found in
Table 1 of this AD to do the initial and repetitive inspections:
    (1) Install access cover plates following Snow Engineering Co.
Service Letter 215, page 5, titled ``802 Spar Inspection
Holes and Vent Tube Mod,'' dated November 19, 2003.
    (2) Eddy current inspect for cracks the center splice joint
outboard two fastener holes in both the right and left wing main
spar lower caps following Snow Engineering Co. Process Specification
197, page 1, revised June 4, 2002; pages 2 through 4, dated
February 23, 2001; and page 5, dated May 3, 2002.

                                            Table 1--Inspection Times
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                             Repetitively inspect  thereafter at
              SNs                     Condition         Initially inspect          intervals  not to exceed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(i) AT-802 and AT-802A, SNs -    As manufactured...  Upon accumulating       850 hours TIS.
 0001 through -0091.                                  1,700 hours TIS after
                                                      April 21, 2006 (the
                                                      effective date of AD
                                                      2006-08-09) or within
                                                      the next 50 hours TIS
                                                      after April 21, 2006
                                                      (the effective date
                                                      of AD 2006-08-09),
                                                      whichever occurs
                                                      later.
(ii) AT-802 and AT-802A, serial  Modified with       If performing the       1,700 hours TIS.
 numbers SNs -0001 through -      cold[dash]worked    cold[dash]working
 0091.                            fastener holes      procedure in Service
                                  following Service   Letter 244,
                                  Letter 244, dated        it includes the
                                  April 25, 2005.     initial eddy current
                                                      inspection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (f) One of the following must do the eddy current inspections
required in paragraph (e)(2) of this AD:
    (1) A level 2 or 3 inspector certified in eddy current
inspection using the guidelines established by the American Society
for Nondestructive Testing or MIL-STD-410; or
    (2) A person authorized to perform AD work and who has completed
and passed the Air Tractor, Inc. training course on eddy current
inspection on wing lower spar caps.
    (g) If cracks are found during any inspection required in
paragraph (e)(2) of this AD, repair or replace any cracked spar cap
before further flight after the inspection in which cracks are
found. For repair or replacement, do whichever of the following that
applies:
    (1) For cracks that can be repaired by incorporating the
modification specified in paragraph (j) of this AD, do the actions
following the procedures in paragraph (j) of this AD before further
flight after the inspection in which cracks are found.
    (2) For cracks that cannot be repaired by incorporating the
modification specified in paragraph (j) of this AD, replace the
lower spar caps and associated parts listed following the procedures
identified in paragraph (h) of this AD before further flight after
the inspection in which cracks are found.
    (h) For all AT-802 and AT-802A airplanes, replace the wing main
spar lower caps, the center joint splice blocks and hardware, the
wing attach angles and hardware, and install the steel web splice
plate (P/N 21106-1 for SNs -0001 through -0091, and P/N 20094-2 for
all SNs beginning with -0092). Do the replacement upon accumulating
the safe life hours TIS on the wing main spar lower caps as listed
in Table 2 of this AD or within 50 hours TIS after April 21, 2006
(the effective date of AD 2006-08-09), whichever occurs later. For
SNs -0001 through -0091, you may extend the safe life hours TIS of
the wing main spar lower caps to 8,000 hours TIS before doing the
replacement if you modified your wing as specified in paragraph (j)
of this AD.
    (1) Use the following service information for replacement:
    (i) For airplane Models AT-802 and AT-802A, SNs -0001 through -
0091, follow

Snow Engineering Co. Drawing Number 20975, Sheet 3, dated January 6,
2005; and Process Specification 204, Rev. C, dated November
16, 2004.
    (ii) For airplane Models AT-802 and AT-802A, SNs beginning with
-0092, follow Drawing Number 20975, Sheet 2, Rev. A, dated September
1, 2004; and Process Specification 204, Rev. C, dated
November 16, 2004.
    (2) The following presents the safe life and replacement times
as required in paragraph (h) of this AD:

                                    Table 2--Safe Life and Replacement Times
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      SNs                                         Wing spar lower cap safe life
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AT-802-0001 through AT-802-0059...............  4,132 hours TIS.
AT-802-0060 through AT-802-0091...............  4,188 hours TIS.
All beginning with AT-802-0092................  8,163 hours TIS.
AT-802A-0001 through AT-802A-0059.............  4,969 hours TIS.
AT-802A-0060 through AT-802A-0091.............  4,531 hours TIS.
All beginning with AT-802A-0092...............  8,648 hours TIS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (i) After replacing the wing main spar lower caps and hardware,
installing the web splice plate, and cold working the fastener holes
by following Snow Engineering Co. Drawing Number 20975, Sheet 3,
dated January 6, 2005 (SNs -0001 through -0091); or Sheet 2, Rev. A,
dated September 1, 2004 (all SNs beginning with -0092); and Process
Specification 204, Rev. C, dated November 16, 2004, the new
safe life for the wing main spar lower caps is as follows:

                              Table 3--New Safe Life for Wing Main Spar Lower Caps
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                      SNs                                         Wing spar lower cap safe life
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All beginning with AT-802-0001................  8,163 hours TIS.
All beginning with AT-802A-0001...............  8,648 hours TIS.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

     (j) For Models AT-802 and AT-802A airplanes, SNs -0001 through
-0091, in lieu of replacing the wing main spar lower cap at the safe
life hours TIS listed in Table 2 in paragraph (h) of this AD, you
may extend the safe life of the wing main spar lower caps by doing
the following actions. Between 3,200 hours TIS and the safe life
hours TIS for your airplane currently listed in Table 2 of this AD,
do the following, unless already done:
    (1) Modify the wing by installing P/N 20997-2 web plate and P/N
20985-1 and 20985-2 extended 8-bolt splice blocks following Snow
Engineering Co. Drawing 20995, Sheet 2, Rev. C, dated September 28,
2004.
    (2) Cold-work the outboard two fastener holes in both the left
and right hand lower spar caps at the center splice following Snow
Engineering Co. Service Letter 240, dated September 30,
2004.
    (3) Do an eddy current inspection of the wing center splice
joint outboard two fastener holes in both the right and left wing
main spar lower caps for cracks at the time of modification
following Snow Engineering Co. Process Specification 197,
page 1, revised June 4, 2002; pages 2 through 4, dated February 23,
2001; and page 5, dated May 3, 2002.
    (4) If, before the effective date of this AD, an airplane has
already been modified following paragraph (j)(1) of this AD but did
not receive cold working in the outboard two fastener holes in both
the left and right hand lower spar caps following paragraph (j)(2)
of this AD, do the following:
    (i) Initially do an eddy current inspection within the next
2,400 hours TIS after the modification, using the procedure in
paragraph (j)(3) of this AD, and repetitively thereafter at
intervals not to exceed every 1,200 hours TIS until the wing spar
lower cap reaches 8,000-hour TIS safe life.
    (ii) At any time after the modification, you may do the cold
working in the outboard two fastener holes in both the left and
right hand lower spar caps following paragraph (j)(2) of this AD to
terminate the repetitive eddy current inspections required in
paragraph (j)(4)(i) of this AD.
    (5) If you have modified your airplane following paragraph
(j)(1) of this AD prior to 3,200 hours TIS, you must do the
following to reach the extended 8,000-hour TIS safe life:
    (i) If you did not cold work in the outboard two fastener holes
in both the left and right hand lower spar caps following paragraph
(j)(2) of this AD, you must do the repetitive eddy current
inspections following paragraph (j)(4)(i) of this AD until you
accumulate 4,800 hours TIS after the modification on the wing spar
lower cap. Upon accumulation of 4,800 hours TIS after the
modification on the wing spar lower cap, do the repetitive eddy
current inspections at intervals not to exceed every 600 hours TIS
until you reach the extended safe life of 8,000-hour TIS.
    (ii) If you did cold work the outboard two fastener holes in
both the left and right hand lower spar caps following paragraph
(j)(2) of this AD, upon accumulation of 4,800 hours TIS after the
modification on the wing spar lower cap do the repetitive eddy
current inspections at intervals not to exceed every 600 hours TIS
until you reach the 8,000-hour TIS safe life.
    (6) For the initial and repetitive eddy current inspections
required in paragraphs (j)(3), (j)(4)(i), (j)(5)(i) and (j)(5)(ii)
of this AD, follow the instructions as specified in Snow Engineering
Co. Process Specification 197, page 1, revised June 4,
2002; pages 2 through 4, dated February 23, 2001; and page 5, dated
May 3, 2002. For any cracks found, follow the instructions for
repair or replacement as specified in paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (k) If any cracks are found as a result of any inspection
required in paragraphs (e)(2), (j)(3), (j)4)(i), (j)(5)(i), and
(j)(5)(ii) of this AD, report any cracks you find within 10 days
after the cracks are found or within 10 days after April 21, 2006
(the effective date of AD 2006-08-09), whichever occurs later.
    (1) Include in your report the aircraft SN, aircraft hours TIS,
wing spar cap hours TIS, crack location and size, corrective action
taken, and a point of contact name and phone number. Send your
report to Andrew McAnaul, Aerospace Engineer, ASW-150 (c/o MIDO-43),
10100 Reunion Place, Suite 650, San Antonio, Texas 78216; telephone:
(210) 308-3365; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (2) The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the
information collection requirements contained in this regulation
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act and assigned OMB
Control Number 2120-0056.

Special Permit Flight

    (l) Under 14 CFR part 39.23, we are allowing special flight
permits for the purpose of compliance with this AD under the
following conditions:
    (1) Only operate in day visual flight rules (VFR).
    (2) Ensure that the hopper is empty.
    (3) Limit airspeed to 135 miles per hour (mph) indicated
airspeed (IAS).
    (4) Avoid any unnecessary g-forces.
    (5) Avoid areas of turbulence.
    (6) Plan the flight to follow the most direct route.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (m) The Manager, Fort Worth Airplane Certification Office, ASW-
150, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14

CFR 39.19. Send information to ATTN: Andy McAnaul, Aerospace
Engineer, ASW-150, FAA San Antonio MIDO-43, 10100 Reunion Pl., Ste.
650, San Antonio, Texas 78216; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (210)
308-3370. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which
the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI)
in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI,
your local FSDO.
    (n) AMOCs approved for AD 2006-08-09 are not approved for this
AD.

Related Information

    (o) To get copies of the service information referenced in this
AD, contact Air Tractor, Inc., P.O. Box 485, Olney, Texas 76374;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: www.airtractor.com. To view the AD
docket, go to U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations,
M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, or on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on July 31, 2009.
James E. Jackson,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-18815 Filed 8-5-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P