	DATA EVALUATION RECORD
	LIFE-CYCLE SEDIMENT Chironomus dilutus TOXICITY TEST
             (FOLLOWING EPA TEST METHOD 100.5; 850.1760, in prep)

1.  CHEMICAL:  Dacthal (DCPA)				PC Code No.:  078701

2.  TEST MATERIAL:  Dacthal(R) Technical herbicide		Purity:  99.3%

3.  CITATION:

	Authors:	Picard, C.R.
	Title:	Dacthal Technical - Life-Cycle Toxicity Test Exposing Midges (Chironomus dilutus) to a Test Substance Applied to Sediment Under Static-Renewal Conditions Following EPA Test Methods.
	Study Completion Date:	March 10, 2016
	Laboratory:	Smithers Viscient
		790 Main Street
		Wareham, Massachusetts 02571-1037, USA
	Sponsor:	AMVAC Chemical Corporation
		4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 1200
		Newport Beach, California 92660, USA
	Laboratory Report ID:	11857.6110
	MRID No.:	49865802
	DP Barcode:	432681

4.  REVIEWED BY:  David A. McEwen, Staff Scientist, CDM Smith/CSS-Dynamac JV
     Signature:  		Date:  12/01/2016

     APPROVED BY:  Moncie V. Wright, Environmental Scientist, CDM Smith/CSS-Dynamac JV

	Signature: 	Date:  01/06/2017

5.  APPROVED BY:  Christina M. Wendel, Biologist, OPP/EFED/ERB2

        	Signature:  				Date: 12/01/2021

		Susan Thomas, Biologist, OPP/EFED/ERB4

     Signature:	Date: 06/02/2021

		Michael Wagman, Senior Scientist, OPP/EFED/ERB2

     Signature:	Date: 11/30/2021

6.  DISCLAIMER:  This Data Evaluation Record may have been altered by the Environmental Fate and Effects Division subsequent to signing by CDM/CSS-Dynamac JV personnel.
7.  STUDY PARAMETERS:

     	Scientific Name of Test Organism:	Chironomus dilutus
     	Age of Test Organism:	First instar larvae, 3 days old
     	Definitive Test Duration:	60 days
     	Study Method:	Intermittent flow-through
     	Type of Concentrations:	Time-weighted average (TWA) sediment (bulk and OC-normalized), TWA pore water and TWA overlying water concentrations
8.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:

      The 60-day chronic toxicity of Chlorthal-dimethyl (Technical DCPA) to Chironomus dilutus was studied under static renewal conditions at nominal concentrations of 0 (negative and solvent controls), 2.6, 6.4, 16, 40 and 100 mg a.i./kg-sediment. Given the length of time between measurements of DCPA in various sample matrices (sediment, and/or water), on test days 0, 17 and 60, respectively, the reviewer calculated the time-weighted (TWA) concentrations and these are as follows for each representative sample matrix:  <0.21 (<LOD, negative and solvent controls), 1.7, 4.4, 11, 29, and 84 mg a.i./kg in bulk sediment (OC-normalized treatment concentrations equivalent to 81, 209, 537, 1373 and 3981 mg a.i./kg OC, based on 2.1% OC), <0.0029 (<LOD, negative and solvent controls), 0.020, 0.061, 0.13, 0.22 and 0.24 mg a.i./L in pore water and <0.0029 (<LOD, negative and solvent controls), 0.0020, 0.0036, 0.0073, 0.015 and 0.024 mg a.i./L in overlying water. All pore water samples were generated by centrifuging the sediment samples for approximately 30 minutes.

      Results Synopsis:  It was determined that the solvent control positively impacted numerous parameters, as noted by the significant differences (and worse performance for negative controls) that were observed between the solvent and negative control for the following parameters: no. eggs/emerged female, no. eggs/primary egg case, % emerged, and egg cases/emerged female. Even for those endpoints where the solvent control was not statistically significantly different from negative controls (other than the time-based endpoints), the solvent control had substantial differences (solvent had mean 24% in biomass, 26% mortality/survival at D17). Therefore, it was determined that the results reported for the negative control were likely the effect of the solvent and not the test substance. There were no treatment-related effects at the highest test level based on the solvent control. Clearly for some endpoints they are impacted by the solvent, but it cannot be ruled out entirely for the other endpoints either, therefore this is an uncertainty of this study, and is considered a study deficiency.

     Based on Comparison to Negative Control (all concentrations are based on time-weighted averages)
Endpoint
                                 Bulk Sediment
                                 (mg a.i./kg)
                            OC-Normalized Sediment
                                (mg a.i./g OC)
                                  Pore Water
                                  (mg a.i./L)
                                Overlying Water
                                  (mg a.i./L)
Day 17 Survival
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
Day 17 AFDW
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
Time to death
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
No. eggs/emerged female*
                                  NOAEC: 1.7
                                  LOAEC: 4.4
                                 NOAEC: 0.081
                                  LOAEC: 0.21
                                 NOAEC: 0.020
                                 LOAEC: 0.061
                                 NOAEC: 0.0020
                                 LOAEC: 0.0036
No. eggs/primary egg case*
                                NOAEC: <1.7
                                  LOAEC: 1.7
                               NOAEC: <0.081
                                 LOAEC: 0.081
                               NOAEC: <0.020
                                 LOAEC: 0.020
                               NOAEC: <0.0020
                                 LOAEC: 0.0020
% emergence*
                                  NOAEC: 1.7
                                  LOAEC: 4.4
                                 NOAEC: 0.081
                                  LOAEC: 0.21
                                 NOAEC: 0.020
                                 LOAEC: 0.061
                                 NOAEC: 0.0020
                                 LOAEC: 0.0036
Primary Egg cases/emerged female*
                                  NOAEC: 1.7
                                  LOAEC: 4.4
                                 NOAEC: 0.081
                                  LOAEC: 0.21
                                 NOAEC: 0.020
                                 LOAEC: 0.061
                                 NOAEC: 0.0020
                                 LOAEC: 0.0036
Time to oviposition
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
      * Statistically significant effects for no. of eggs/emerged female, no. of eggs/primary egg case, % emergence, and primary egg cases/emerged female.

     Based on Comparison to Solvent Control (all concentrations are based on time-weighted averages)
Endpoint
                                 Bulk Sediment
                                 (mg a.i./kg)
                            OC-Normalized Sediment
                                (mg a.i./g OC)
                                  Pore Water
                                  (mg a.i./L)
                                Overlying Water
                                  (mg a.i./L)
Day 17 Survival
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
Day 17 AFDW
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
Time to death
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
No. eggs/emerged female
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
No. eggs/primary egg case
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  /NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
% emergence
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
Primary Egg cases/emerged female
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
Time to oviposition
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024

	Endpoint(s) Affected:  None (based on comparison to solvent control)

9.  ADEQUACY OF THE STUDY:

	A.  Classification:  This study is scientifically sound and is classified as supplemental and 				may be used for risk characterization only.

      B. Rationale:  This study protocol followed methods described in the "Methods for Measuring the Toxicity and Bioaccumulation of Sediment-associated Contaminants with Freshwater Invertebrates", 2[nd] Edition, Test Method 100.5 (U.S. EPA 2000).  The solvent that was used in this test, acetone, impacted numerous parameters, as noted by the significant differences that were observed between the solvent and negative control (no. eggs/emerged female, no. eggs/primary egg case, % emerged, and egg cases/emerged female). It was determined that the reported results for the negative control were in fact likely the effect of the solvent and not the test substance. However, both Test Method 100.5 and OCSPP 850.1000 guideline recommend that if solvents are used, they not adversely affect test organisms. Clearly for some endpoints they are impacted by the solvent, but it cannot be ruled out entirely for the other endpoints either, therefore this is an uncertainty of this study, and is considered a study deficiency. The test used first instar larvae, (3 days old); however, the 100.5 test method recommends starting with younger (<24-hr) larvae and states that starting with substantially older organisms may compromise the emergence and reproductive endpoints.

      C. Reparability:  N/A

10.  GUIDELINE DEVIATIONS:

   This study falls under the U.S. EPA guideline 850.1760 that is currently in prep.  The study methods were assessed according to the EPA Test method 100.5, and the following deficiencies were observed:

 The solvent that was used in this test, acetone, impacted numerous parameters, and it was determined that the reported results for the negative control were likely the effect of the solvent and not the test substance.
 The test used first instar larvae, 3 days old; however, the 100.5 test method recommends starting with younger (<24-hr) larvae and states that starting with substantially older organisms may compromise the emergence and reproductive endpoints. This is considered a minor deviation.
 The study report did not clearly lay out what the difference was between the total # of surviving `midge' and total # of surviving `larvae' in the columns in the day 17 table on page 124. The study author used the total # of surviving `midge' column and the reviewer used the total # of surviving `larvae' to estimate the % survival calculations and statistical analysis. The negative control % survival was 90% and met the control criteria. However, the solvent control % survival was barely below the control criteria of 70% (67%).

11.  MATERIALS AND METHODS:

	A.  Test Organisms/Acclimation
                              Guideline Criteria
                             Reported Information
Species
Chironomus dilutus (formerly C. tentans)
Midges
Chironomus dilutus
Life Stage
<24-hr old larvae

First instar larvae, 3 days old at test initiation
Source
Collect a min. of 6 to 8 egg cases.
Newly-oviposited egg masses were obtained from the laboratory's culture facility.
All organisms from the same source?
Yes
Culture Conditions
Transfer all egg cases to a crystallizing dish containing control water.  Discard larvae that have already left the cases.

Test organisms must be cultured and tested at 23°C, ideally in the same water used for testing.
Egg masses were isolated from the main culture and held in laboratory well water at a temperature of ca. 23°C and observed daily until hatch.

Hatched larvae were transferred to a shallow glass bowl containing ca. 1 L of laboratory well water (culture water) and reared under static conditions with gentle oil-free aeration for 3 days.  During rearing, the temperature was maintained at ca. 23°C and the dissolved oxygen ranged from 7.2 to 7.6 mg/L. The larvae reared in the culture bowls for 3 days after hatching were used to provide first instar larvae for use during the exposure period.
Feeding

Hatched larvae were provided with 2.5 mL of Ankistrodesmus falcatus (4 x 10[7] cells/mL) at the start of the 3-day rearing period to serve as both a substrate and food.

      B.  Test System
                              Guideline Criteria
                             Reported Information
Dilution water (overlying water)
Culture water, well water, surface water, site water, or reconstituted water

Laboratory well water characterized as having a total hardness and total alkalinity of 52 and 20 mg/L as CaCO3, respectively, a pH of 6.6, and a conductivity of 320 uS/cm.
Representative samples of the overlying water were analyzed periodically for pesticides, PCBs, and toxic metals by GeoLabs, Inc., Braintree, MA. None of these compounds were detected in any of the samples analyzed in at concentrations that are considered toxic in agreement with ASTM (2007) standard practice. The results of these analyses were not provided in the study report for reference. Samples of overlying water were analyzed monthly for total organic carbon (TOC) concentration, which ranged from 0.26 to 0.89 mg/L for Sept. to Nov. 2015, respectively.
Does water support test animals without observable signs of stress?

Yes
Water Temperature
23 +- 1°C
Overall range (Daily meas. Overlying water):  21 to 24°C
Continuous monitoring in auxiliary vessel:  21 to 25°C (see Reviewer's Comments)
pH
Overall range (overlying water): 6.4 to 7.2
Overall range (pore water): 5.9 to 6.8
Overall (in the sediment): 7.1
Dissolved Oxygen
>2.5 mg/L
Overall range (overlying water): 2.5 to 7.6 mg/L
Ammonia
Should not vary more than 50%.
Overall range (overlying water): <=0.10 to 0.87 mg/L as N
Overall range (pore water): 1.1 to 2.5 mg/L as N
Hardness
Should not vary more than 50%.
Overall range (overlying water): 52 to 80 mg/L as CaCO3
Alkalinity
Should not vary more than 50%.
Overall range (overlying water): 14 to 26 mg/L as CaCO3
Conductivity
Overall range (overlying water): 380 to 510 μS/cm
Test Sediment
Natural or formulated sediment
Artificial sediment (Batch No. 072915) was prepared according to OECD Guideline No. 218 (2004) by mixing the following components (on a dry weight basis):  2.4 kg sphagnum peat, 9.6 kg kaolin clay and 36 kg fine sand (5.0, 20, and 75%, respectively).  While blending the sediment components using a large-scale laboratory mixer, a total of 9.6 L of laboratory well water was also added.

Prior to use, the peat was pre-soaked in dilution water for 1 week.  During this time, the peat was amended with 160 g of powdered CaCO3 to increase the pH from 3.3 to 6.0.
Representative samples of the sediment were analyzed periodically for pesticides, PCBs, and toxic metals by GeoLabs, Inc., Braintree, MA. None of these compounds were detected at concentrations that are considered toxic in any of the samples analyzed in agreement with ASTM (2007) standard practice. The results of these analyses were not provided in the study report for reference.
Sediment Characterization
pH, ammonia concentration of pore water, organic carbon content (total organic carbon (TOC)), particle size distribution, and percent water content should be reported
Characterized by Agvise Laboratories, Northwood, North Dakota
Particle distribution  -  83% sand, 4% silt, 13% clay
Percent organic carbon  -  2.1%
Percent solids  -  67.26%
Percent moisture at 1/3 bar  -  not reported
pH  -  7.1
Ammonia concentration of pore water on Day 0 in the control group  -  2.5 mg/L (as N)
Test Material

Identity:  Dacthal[(R)] technical herbicide (DCPA a.i.)
IUPAC name: Tetrachloroterephthalic acid
CAS name: 2,3,5,6-tetrachloro-1,4-benzenedicarboxylic acid
CAS No.:  1861-32-1
Description:  Not reported
Batch No.:  120904-1
Purity:  99.3%
Storage:  Room temperature, in a dark ventilated cabinet
Aqueous solubility:  Not reported

A 25 mg/mL primary stock solution was prepared by bringing 0.6298 g of test substance to 25 mL with acetone.  Five individual dosing stock solutions were then prepared (at 0.600 to 23.0 mg/mL) by diluting the appropriate volume of primary stock into 10 mL acetone.  All dosing stock solutions were clear and colorless with no visible undissolved test substance.
Solvents

Acetone, 10 mL/2.068 kg dw

The acetone was allowed to evaporate during the mixing procedure.

Both solvent control and negative control groups were included in the study.
Sediment Spiking

A jar-rolling technique was used to apply the test substance to the sediment.  A 10-mL volume of the appropriate prepared dosing stock solution (in acetone) was applied to 0.050 kg of fine silica sand and the solvent was allowed to evaporate off for 50 minutes.  The dry sand was then added to 3.0 kg of wet sediment (total of 2.068 kg dw based on percent solids of 67.26% and including the 0.05 kg fine silica sand) in individual glass jars (e.g., 4-L).  Each jar was then rolled at room temperature for 4 hours at ca. 15 rpm.

The range of nominal concentrations (nominally 2.6 to 100 mg/kg dw) was based upon the results of a preliminary testing and in consultation with the Sponsor.
Sediment Conditioning

Prior to the definitive study, a 28-day test was conducted in order to establish the time required to reach equilibration in spiked sediment (Smithers Viscient Study No. 11857.6112; Appendix 2; pg. 93-95). The sediment was treated at a single nominal level of 10 mg/kg dw as previously-described by dosing sand, allowing the solvent to evaporate for 45 minutes, and incorporating the treated sand into formulated sediment. The treated sediment was rolled for 4 hours on a rolling mill at 15 rpm and then stored upright overnight at 2 to 8°C. At 1, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days, the treated sediment was rolled for an additional 2 hours, sampled in triplicate and samples centrifuged at 10,000 g for 15 to 30 minutes to generate pore water samples. The results demonstrated that pore water concentrations on Days 14 and 21 were statistically similar and suggestive of pore water equilibrium. Based on these results, and consultation with the study sponsor, an approximate 14-day equilibration time of spiked sediments was used in the sediment toxicity testing with dacthal.

The jars containing treated sediment were stored upright in a dark refrigerator at 2 to 8°C for a 14-day equilibration period (see Reviewer's Comments).

Once a week during the 14-day equilibration period and prior to being added into the replicate exposure vessels, the jars were mixed on the rolling mill at room temperature for 2 hours to ensure the sediment was homogeneous.
Test Vessels
300 mL high-form lipless glass beakers containing 100 mL of sediment and 175 ml of overlying water
300-mL glass vessels, with two slots cut on the top edge covered with 40-mesh Nitex(R) screen for drainage.

Each vessel contained 100 mL (ca. 4.0-cm layer) of sediment (equivalent to 172 g wet weight or 116 g dw) and 175 mL of overlying water.  The total overlying water plus sediment volume was maintained at approx. 275 mL.

On Day 14, emergence traps were placed over the test vessels to trap emergent flies for the remainder of the test.  The emergence traps were 3.5-cm tall Plexiglass[(R)] tubes (6-cm id) covered with wide-mesh Nitex(R) screen.
Reproductive/oviposit chambers
Plexiglass[(R)] tubes (3.5-cm length, 6-cm id) covered on the top with wide-mesh Nitex(R) screen and placed within a 100 x 20-mm Petri dish.  With midge addition, ca. 50 mL of laboratory well water was added to the Petri dish.
Type of Dilution System
Continuous or intermittent

Intermittent flow-through
Flow Rate
2 volume additions/day
Days 0 to 5:  2 volume additions/day
Days 6 to 60:  4 volume additions/day
Aeration
None, unless DO in overlying water drops <2.5 mg/L

None reported
Photoperiod
16-hours light, 8-hours dark using wide-spectrum fluorescent lights; intensity of 100 to 1000 lux

16-hour light/8-hour dark photoperiod using fluorescent bulbs at an intensity range of 290 to 460 lux.
Feeding

Midge larvae were fed a finely-ground flaked aqueous fish food suspension (4.0 mg/mL).  During exposure, the food was introduced at a rate of 1.5 mL of flaked fish food suspension per test vessel per day. Representative samples of the food source were analyzed periodically for pesticides, PCBs, and toxic metals by GeoLabs, Inc., Braintree, MA. None of these compounds have been detected at concentrations that are considered toxic in any of the samples analyzed in agreement with ASTM (2007) standard practice.
   	C.  Test Design
                              Guideline Criteria
                             Reported Information
Duration
About 50 to 65 days; each treatment is ended separately when no additional emergence occurs for 7 consecutive days.  When no emergence is recorded from a treatment, termination of that level is based on the control sediment using the 7-day criterion.

60 days
Sediment into Test Chambers
One day prior (Day -1) to start of test:  each sediment should be thoroughly homogenized and added to test chambers; Overlying water is added to chambers in a manner that minimizes suspension of sediment.
Test systems were established on Day -1.  Overlying water was gently added using a turbulence reducer, and each vessel was placed under the renewal system.

Additional test systems were established on Day 9 for auxiliary male production.
Renewal of Overlying Water
Renewal of the overlying water should be conducted on day -1 prior to the addition of organisms or food on day 0.  For flow-through systems, the flow rates should not vary by more than 10% between any two chambers at any time.  Proper operation should be verified by calibration prior to test initiation.
The overlying water was renewed by adding two volume additions of water per test vessel per day via an intermittent delivery system in combination with a calibrated water-distribution system.  The test system was calibrated before and after the test, and visually inspected twice daily for proper functioning.  The water system cycled approx. seven times per day and increased to 14 times per day on test day 5 (two and four volume additions per vessel per day, respectively).
Placing Organisms in Test Chambers
Should be handled as little as possible and introduced into overlying water below the air-water interface.
At test initiation (Day 0), first instar midge larvae (3-days old) were impartially added to replicates A-L; until each contained 12 larvae. On Day 10 of the test, first instar midge larvae (up to 3-days old) were impartially added to the four auxiliary male replicates M-P until each contained 12 larvae.
Monitoring the test
All test chambers should be checked daily and observations made to assess organism behavior such as sediment avoidance.
Test systems were observed daily for dead organisms (larvae or pupae) on the sediment surface, abnormal behavior, and characteristics of test solutions.

Also daily beginning on Day 17, the number of emerged midges was recorded (male and female), and once established, reproductive/oviposit (R/O) chambers were checked daily for dead adults and egg masses.  Survival of individual midges was recorded daily until death.
Range Finding Test
A definitive test will not be required if no toxicity is observed at concentrations of 100 mg/kg dry weight of sediment.
Preliminary toxicity assessment
 42-day exposure at nominal levels of 0 (negative control), 0 (acetone solvent control), 0.39, 1.6, 6.3, 25, and 100 mg/kg (dw) sediment
 Dosed sediments were equilibrated for 14 days
 Twelve, 3-day old (first instar) larvae per replicate, with eight replicates per level initiated on Day 0
 Compared to the negative control, there were statistically-significant reductions observed at the 25 and 100 mg/kg levels in Day-20 AFDW and at the 0.39, 6.3 and 100 mg/kg levels in Day 42 percent emergence; however, no clear dose-response was observed, and the reductions were not considered to be treatment-related.
 Based on these results, and in consultation with the Sponsor, nominal sediment concentrations were selected for the definitive test.
Nominal Concentrations of Definitive Test
0 (negative and solvent controls), 2.6, 6.4, 16, 40, and 100 mg ai/kg dw sediment
Number of Test Organisms
12 organisms per test chamber are recommended; 16 replicates per treatment should be used (twelve at Day -1 and four for auxiliary males on Day 10)
12 organisms per test chamber; 144 individuals per treatment level or control

12 biological replicates per level initiated on Day -1
4 biological replicates per level initiated on Day 10 for production of auxiliary males
Test organisms randomly or impartially assigned to test vessels?

Yes
Water Parameter Measurements
Conductivity, hardness, alkalinity, and ammonia should be measured in all treatments at the beginning, on Day 20, and at the end of the test.  Conductivity should also be determined weekly.

DO and pH should be measured at the beginning of the test and at least three times per week thereafter.

Temperature should be measured daily in one test chamber from each treatment.  The temperature of the water bath should be continuously monitored.
Overlying water:
For all levels, total hardness, alkalinity, conductivity, and ammonia (as N) concentrations were measured in a composite sample of overlying water from all available biological replicates on Days 0, 10, 17, and 60.

DO, temperature, and pH were measured in the overlying water of each replicate vessel used for biological monitoring on Days 0, 10, 17 and 60.  On the remaining test days, DO and temperature were measured daily in one alternating replicate from each level.  The temperature was continuously monitored in an auxiliary vessel in the water bath.

Pore water:
The pH and ammonia (as N) were measured in isolated pore water from the negative control level and replicates Q, R and T (chemical analysis replicates) on Days 0, 17 and 60.
Chemical Analysis

Pre-test analyses:
Dosing stock solutions and treated sediment from all levels (prior to allocation into the replicate vessels) were analyzed for dacthal.

In-life analyses:
Concentrations of dacthal were determined in sediment, pore water and overlying water samples from surrogate test vessels collected on Days 0, 17 and 60.

The overlying water was decanted, and the sediment was centrifuged at ca. 10,000 g for 30 minutes to isolate the sediment and pore water matrices.  Sediment samples were then mixed well prior to analysis.

Aqueous samples were analyzed using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC/UV) and sediment samples were analyzed using gas chromatography with micro-electron capture detection (GC/uECD) based on methodology validated at Smithers Viscient (see Reviewer's Comments).

12.  REPORTED RESULTS:

   A.  General Results
                              Guideline Criteria
                             Reported Information
Quality assurance and GLP compliance statements were in - cluded in the report?
Yes. This study was conducted in accordance with GLP Standards as specified in 40 CFR, Part 160 with the following exceptions:  routine water, sediment and food contaminant screening analyses for pesticides, PCBs, and toxic metals. It was reported, however, that these analyses were conducted following standard validated methods.
Control Criteria
Was control survival at least 70% and dry weight at least 0.6 mg/organism (0.48 mg/organisms AFDW) on Day 20?

Was control emergence >=50%?

Was the mean number of control eggs/egg case >=800 and was the percent hatch >=80%?
All control criteria met:
Negative control:  90% and 1.67 mg AFDW/ larva
Solvent control:  67% and 2.07 mg AFDW/ larva

Negative control:  85%
Solvent control:  62%

Negative control:  1358 eggs/mass and 89%
Solvent control:  1078 eggs/mass and 88%
Percent Recovery of Chemical

Procedural recoveries (from QC samples) conducted concurrently with sample analysis:
Sediment:
Spiked at 1.00, 16.0, and 100 mg/kg
Recovery range of 88.5 to 109% (n=9)
LOQ sediment  = 0.21 mg a.i./kg
Aqueous:
Spiked at 0.005, 0.500, and 10.0 mg/L
Recovery range of 99.6 to 115% (n=9)
LOQ water  = 0.0025 to 0.0029 mg a.i./L
Data Endpoints

Day 17:
- Survival
- Ash-free dry weight (AFDW)
Day 60:
- Percent emergence
- Male and female emergence rates
- Male and female days to death (for mated midges)
- Eggs masses per mated female
- Eggs per egg mass
- Eggs per mated female
- Percent hatch
- Days to oviposition
Raw data included?
Yes

Effects Data (study author results):

     Day 17 Endpoints:

     Survival on Day 17 averaged 90 and 92% in the negative and solvent controls, respectively, and was 85, 75, 73, 94, and 83% in the mean-measured 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, respectively.  No statistically-significant differences were reported at any treatment level compared to the negative control.  In terms of mean-measured sediment concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC for Day 17 survival were 86 and >86 mg a.i./kg, respectively.  In terms of mean-measured pore water concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC for Day 17 survival were 0.25 and >0.25 mg a.i./L, respectively.

     Ash-free dry weight (AFDW) on Day 17 averaged 1.67 and 2.07 mg per larvae for the negative and solvent controls, respectively, and was 1.64, 2.60, 2.32, 2.19, and 2.05 mg per larvae in the mean-measured 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, respectively.  No statistically-significant differences were reported at any treatment level compared to the negative control.  The reported NOAEC and LOAEC for Day 17 AFDW were 86 and >86 mg a.i./kg, respectively, using mean-measured sediment concentrations.  In terms of mean-measured pore water concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC were 0.25 and >0.25 mg a.i./L, respectively.

                              Test Concentration
                                    Day 17
                                 Mean-measured
                            (and Nominal) Sediment,
                                  mg a.i./kg
                           Mean-measured Pore Water,
                                   mg a.i./L
                                   Survival
                                 (% +- SD)[1]
                                     AFDW
                               (mg/larva +- SD)
                               Negative control
                                 90 +- 8 (90)
                                 1.67 +- 0.17
                                Solvent control
                                 92 +- 12 (67)
                                 2.07 +- 0.53
                                   1.8 (2.6)
                                     0.021
                                 85 +- 4 (75)
                                 1.64 +- 0.35
                                   4.8 (6.4)
                                     0.060
                                 75 +- 7 (65)
                                 2.60 +- 0.33
                                    12 (16)
                                     0.12
                                 73 +- 18 (69)
                                 2.32 +- 0.26
                                    30 (40)
                                     0.21
                                 94 +- 8 (90)
                                 2.19 +- 0.35
                                   86 (100)
                                     0.25
                                 83 +- 15 (73)
                                 2.05 +- 0.77
 LOQ = 0.21 mg a.i./kg dw for sediment samples and 0.0025-0.0029 mg a.i./L for aqueous samples.
 [1] Reviewer-calculated numbers differed from the study author in some cases and are presented in (parentheses). The study author used the total # of surviving `midge' column and the reviewer used the total # of surviving `larvae' to estimate the % survival calculations and statistical analysis (Day 17 table, pg 124 of study report).

     Day 60 Endpoints:

     Percent emergence averaged 85 and 62% in the negative and solvent controls, respectively, and was 88, 60, 68, 79, and 69% in the mean-measured 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, respectively.  A statistically-significant difference was reported at the 12 mg ai/kg level (p<0.05, Steel's Many-One Rank Sum Test) compared to the negative control. However, this reduction was not considered to be treatment related due to the lack of a clear dose response.  In terms of mean-measured sediment concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC for percent emergence were 86 and >86 mg a.i./kg, respectively.  In terms of mean-measured pore water concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC were 0.25 and >0.25 mg a.i./L, respectively.

                              Test Concentration
                                    Day 60
                                 Mean-measured
                            (and Nominal) Sediment,
                                  mg a.i./kg
                           Mean-measured Pore Water,
                                   mg a.i./L
                            Percent Emergence +- SD
                                Male Emergence
                                  Rate +- SD
                          Female Emergence Rate +- SD
                           Male Days to Death +- SD
                          Female Days to Death +- SD
                               Negative control
                                    85 +- 9
                               0.0459 +- 0.0055
                               0.0404 +- 0.0024
                                  4.1 +- 0.63
                                  4.2 +- 0.53
                                Solvent control
                                   62 +- 10
                               0.0515 +- 0.0009
                               0.0460 +- 0.0015
                                  4.8 +- 2.4
                                  3.9 +- 0.45
                                   1.8 (2.6)
                                     0.021
                                    88 +- 9
                               0.0470 +- 0.0033
                               0.0432 +- 0.0032
                                  4.2 +- 0.68
                                  4.1 +- 0.57
                                   4.8 (6.4)
                                     0.060
                                   60 +- 38
                               0.0499 +- 0.0024
                               0.0438 +- 0.0035
                                  4.5 +- 1.5
                                  3.7 +- 0.73
                                    12 (16)
                                     0.12
                                  68 +- 11[a]
                               0.0489 +- 0.0035
                               0.0448 +- 0.0031
                                  3.7 +- 1.9
                                  4.0 +- 0.46
                                    30 (40)
                                     0.21
                                   79 +- 16
                               0.0484 +- 0.0028
                               0.0435 +- 0.0028
                                  4.1 +- 0.74
                                3.5 +- 0.63[b]
                                   86 (100)
                                     0.25
                                   69 +- 25
                               0.0460 +- 0.0028
                               0.0418 +- 0.0026
                                  3.7 +- 1.1
                                  3.8 +- 0.46
a	Statistically-significant reduction compared to the negative control (p<0.05; Steel's Many-One Rank Sum Test).  However, this reduction was not considered to be treatment related due to the lack of a clear dose response.
b	Statistically-significant reduction compared to the negative control (p<0.05; Bonferroni's Adjusted t-Test).  However, this reduction was not considered to be treatment related due to the lack of a clear dose response.
LOQ = 0.21 mg a.i./kg dw for sediment samples and 0.0025-0.0029 mg a.i./L for aqueous samples.

     Male emergence rates averaged 0.0459 and 0.0515 for the negative and solvent controls, respectively, and were 0.0470, 0.0499, 0.0489, 0.0484, and 0.0460 in the mean-measured 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, respectively.  No statistically-significant differences were reported at any treatment level compared to the negative control.  The reported NOAEC and LOAEC for male emergence rate were 86 and >86 mg a.i./kg, respectively.  In terms of mean-measured pore water concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC were 0.25 and >0.25 mg a.i./L, respectively.

     Female emergence rates averaged 0.0404 and 0.0460 for the negative and solvent controls, respectively, and were 0.0432, 0.0438, 0.0448, 0.0435, and 0.0418 for the mean-measured 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, respectively.  No statistically-significant differences were reported at any treatment level compared to the negative control.  The reported NOAEC and LOAEC for female emergence rate were 86 and >86 mg ai/kg, respectively.  In terms of mean-measured pore water concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC were 0.25 and >0.25 mg a.i./L, respectively.

     For the negative control, solvent control, and mean-measured 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, male time to death averaged 4.1, 4.8, 4.2, 4.5, 3.7, 4.1, and 3.7 days, respectively, and female time to death averaged 4.2, 3.9, 4.1, 3.7, 4.0, 3.5, and 3.8 days, respectively.  For male days to death, no statistically-significant differences were reported compared to the negative control at any treatment level.  For female days to death, a statistically-significant difference was reported at the 30 mg a.i./kg level (p<0.05, Bonferroni's Adjusted t-Test) compared to the negative control.  However, this reduction was not considered to be treatment related due to the lack of a clear dose response. The reported NOAEC and LOAEC for both endpoints were 86 and >86 mg a.i./kg, respectively.  In terms of mean-measured pore water concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC were 0.25 and >0.25 mg a.i./L, respectively.

     The mean number of eggs per egg mass averaged 1358 and 1078 for the negative and solvent controls, respectively, and was 1135, 1162, 1023, 1241, and 1011 in the mean-measured 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, respectively.  A treatment-related decrease (p<0.05, Bonferroni's Adjusted t-Test) in the number of eggs per egg mass was reported at 86 mg a.i./kg compared to the negative control.  The significant decrease noted at 12 mg a.i./kg was not considered to be related to treatment due to the lack of a clear dose response.  The mean number of egg masses per mated female averaged 0.96 and 0.79 for the negative and solvent controls, respectively, and was 0.95, 0.65, 0.74, 0.98, and 0.72 in the mean-measured 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, respectively.  A treatment-related decrease (p<0.05, Wilcoxon's Test with Bonferroni's Adjustment) in the mean number of egg masses per mated female was reported at 86 mg a.i./kg compared to the negative control.  The significant decrease noted at 12 mg a.i./kg was not considered to be related to treatment due to the lack of a clear dose response.  The mean number of eggs per mated female averaged 1316 and 841 for the negative and solvent controls, respectively, and was 1083, 752, 764, 1207, and 715 in the mean-measured 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, respectively.  A treatment-related decrease (p<0.05, Bonferroni's Adjusted t-Test) in the mean number of eggs per mated female was reported at 86 mg a.i./kg compared to the negative control.  The significant decreases noted at 4.8 and 12 mg a.i./kg were not considered to be related to treatment due to the lack of a clear dose response.  In terms of mean-measured sediment concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC for these parameters were 30 and 86 mg a.i./kg, respectively.  In terms of mean-measured pore water concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC were 0.21 and 0.25 mg a.i./L, respectively.

     No treatment-related effects were reported on mean percent hatch or mean days to oviposition.  For the negative control, solvent control, and mean-measured 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, the mean percent hatch averaged 89, 88, 93, 74, 76, 97, and 86%, respectively and mean days to oviposition averaged 1.3, 1.3, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.2, and 1.1, respectively.  The reported NOAEC and LOAEC for these reproductive parameters were 86 and >86 mg a.i./kg, respectively.  In terms of mean-measured pore water concentrations, the reported NOAEC and LOAEC were 0.25 and >0.25 mg a.i./L, respectively.

                              Test Concentration
                                    Day 60
                                 Mean-measured
                            (and Nominal) Sediment,
                                  mg a.i./kg
                           Mean-measured Pore Water,
                                   mg a.i./L
                         Mean Eggs per Egg Mass +- SD
                           Mean Percent Hatch +- SD
                    Mean Egg Masses per Mated Female +- SD
                    Mean No. of Eggs per Mated Female +- SD
                        Mean Days to Oviposition +- SD
                               Negative control
                                  1358 +- 252
                                   89 +- 13
                                 0.96 +- 0.072
                                  1316 +- 310
                                  1.3 +- 0.36
                                Solvent control
                                  1078 +- 229
                                   88 +- 12
                                 0.79 +- 0.16
                                  841 +- 222
                                  1.3 +- 0.35
                                   1.8 (2.6)
                                     0.021
                                  1135 +- 113
                                    93 +- 8
                                 0.95 +- 0.091
                                  1083 +- 168
                                  1.2 +- 0.22
                                   4.8 (6.4)
                                     0.060
                                  1162 +- 81
                                   74 +- 15
                                 0.65 +- 0.46
                                 752 +- 526[a]
                                  1.3 +- 0.17
                                    12 (16)
                                     0.12
                                1023 +- 157[a]
                                   76 +- 18
                                0.74 +- 0.15[b]
                                 764 +- 219[a]
                                  1.4 +- 0.44
                                    30 (40)
                                     0.21
                                  1241 +- 342
                                    97 +- 2
                                 0.98 +- 0.071
                                  1207 +- 340
                                  1.2 +- 0.33
                                   86 (100)
                                     0.25
                                1011 +- 197[c]
                                    86 +- 9
                                0.72 +- 0.16[d]
                                 715 +- 136[c]
                                  1.1 +- 0.19
a	Statistically-significant reduction compared to the negative control (p<0.05; Bonferroni's Adjusted t-Test).  However, this reduction was not considered to be treatment related due to the lack of a clear dose response.
b	Statistically-significant reduction compared to the negative control (p<0.05; Wilcoxon's Test with Bonferroni's Adjustment).  However, this reduction was not considered to be treatment related due to the lack of a clear dose response.
c	Statistically-significant reduction compared to the negative control (p<0.05; Bonferroni's Adjusted t-Test).
d	Statistically-significant reduction compared to the negative control (p<0.05; Wilcoxon's Test with Bonferroni's Adjustment).
LOQ = 0.21 mg a.i./kg dw for sediment samples and 0.0025-0.0029 mg a.i./L for aqueous samples.
Analytical Data:

     Dosing stock solutions and treated sediment from all levels (prior to allocation into the replicate vessels) were analyzed for dacthal.  Recoveries in the stock solutions ranged from 98 to 110% of nominal concentrations.  Analysis of the spiked sediment samples after mixing and prior to allocation into the test vessels resulted in recoveries ranging from 100 to 120% of nominal concentrations.  During testing, concentrations of dacthal were determined in sediment, overlying water and pore water on Days 0, 17 and 60.

     In sediment, concentrations of dacthal were slightly declining during the 60-day period (with reviewer-calculated coefficients of variation of 18 to 32%; see Appendix 1).  For the nominal 2.6, 6.4, 16, 40, and 100 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, sediment concentrations averaged 2.3, 6.3, 15, 37, and 98 mg a.i./kg, respectively, on Day 0; 1.8, 4.5, 12, 30, and 90 mg a.i./kg, respectively, on Day 17; and 1.3, 3.5, 8.8, 24, and 69 mg a.i./kg, respectively, on Day 60.  Overall mean-measured sediment concentrations were 1.8, 4.8, 12, 30, and 86 mg a.i./kg, representing 69 to 86% of nominal sediment levels.

     In pore water, concentrations of dacthal were relatively consistent during the 60-day exposure period (with reviewer-calculated coefficients of variation of 6 to 21%; see Appendix 1).  For the nominal 2.6, 6.4, 16, 40, and 100 mg a.i./kg treatment levels, pore water concentrations averaged 0.023, 0.058, 0.11, 0.17, and 0.25 mg a.i./L, respectively, on Day 0; 0.020, 0.064, 0.15, 0.26, and 0.21 mg a.i./L, respectively, on Day 17; and 0.019, 0.057, 0.12, 0.19, and 0.28 mg a.i./L, respectively, on Day 60.  Overall mean-measured pore water concentrations were 0.021, 0.060, 0.12, 0.21, and 0.25 mg a.i./L.

     In overlying water, maximum concentrations of dacthal were observed on Day 0 and concentrations decreased during the 60-day exposure period (with reviewer-calculated coefficients of variation of 103 to 177%; see Appendix 1).  For the nominal 2.6, 6.4, 16, 40, and 100 mg a.i./kg sediment treatment levels, overlying water concentrations averaged 0.0059, 0.013, 0.023, 0.038, and 0.058 mg a.i./L, on Day 0; <LOQ (<0.0025), <LOQ (<0.0025), 0.0058, 0.017, and 0.025 mg a.i./L, respectively, on Day 17; and <LOQ (<0.0029), 0.0031, 0.0032, 0.0044, and 0.0093 mg a.i./L, respectively, on Day 60.

     B.  Statistical Results (From Study Report)

     Endpoints that were statistically-analyzed included larval survival and growth (ash-free dry weight; AFDW) on Day 17; and percent emergence, emergence rate (gender-specific), time to death (gender-specific), eggs masses per mated female, eggs per egg mass, eggs per mated female, percent hatch, and days to oviposition on Day 60.  Analyses were performed with CETIS[TM] (Version 1.8, 2013) statistical software.  Percent survival, percent emergence and percent hatch data were transformed (e.g., arcsine square-root percentage) prior to analysis.  Results were provided in terms of mean-measured sediment and mean-measured pore water concentrations.

     An Equal Variance Two-Sample t-Test, Unequal Variance Two-Sample t-Test, or Wilcoxon's Rank Sum Two-Sample Test was used to compare the performance of the negative control and solvent control data.  The negative control and solvent control data were similar for all endpoints.  Treatment-level data were compared to the negative control data for all endpoints.

     For all endpoints, the data were tested for normality using the Shapiro-Wilks' Test and for homogeneity of variance using Bartlett's Test.  Data pertaining to egg masses per female and days to oviposition did not meet the assumption for normality and data pertaining to egg masses per female and percent emergence did not meet the assumption of homogeneity of variance; these endpoints were subsequently analyzed using Wilcoxon's Test with Bonferroni's Adjustment or Steel's Many-One Rank Sum Test.  All remaining endpoints met both assumptions and were assessed using Dunnett's Multiple Comparison Test or Bonferroni's Adjustment t-Test.  NOAEC and LOAEC values were assigned based on significance.  All statistical analyses were conducted at the 95% level of certainty except in the case of the qualification tests (i.e., Shapiro-Wilks', Bartlett's), in which a 99% level of certainty was applied.

                                   Endpoint
                                    Methods
                                Mean-measured
                                  Sediment,
                                  mg a.i./kg
                                Mean-measured
                                 Pore Water,
                                   mg a.i./L
Day 17 survival
                     Dunnett's Multiple Comparison Test
                                  NOAEC:  86
                                LOAEC:  >86
                                 NOAEC:  0.25
                               LOAEC:  >0.25
Day 17 AFDW
                     Dunnett's Multiple Comparison Test
                                  NOAEC:  86
                                LOAEC:  >86
                                 NOAEC:  0.25
                               LOAEC:  >0.25
Percent emergence
                       Steel's Many-One Rank Sum Test
                                  NOAEC:  86
                                LOAEC:  >86
                                 NOAEC:  0.25
                               LOAEC:  >0.25
Male emergence rate
                       Bonferroni's Adjustment t-test
                                  NOAEC:  86
                                LOAEC:  >86
                                 NOAEC:  0.25
                               LOAEC:  >0.25
Female emergence rate
                       Bonferroni's Adjustment t-test
                                  NOAEC:  86
                                LOAEC:  >86
                                 NOAEC:  0.25
                               LOAEC:  >0.25
Male days to death
                       Bonferroni's Adjustment t-test
                                  NOAEC:  86
                                LOAEC:  >86
                                 NOAEC:  0.25
                               LOAEC:  >0.25
Female days to death
                       Bonferroni's Adjustment t-test
                                  NOAEC:  86
                                LOAEC:  >86
                                 NOAEC:  0.25
                               LOAEC:  >0.25
Eggs/egg mass
                       Bonferroni's Adjustment t-test
                                  NOAEC:  30
                                  LOAEC:  86
                                 NOAEC:  0.21
                                 LOAEC:  0.25
Percent hatch
                       Bonferroni's Adjustment t-test
                                  NOAEC:  86
                                LOAEC:  >86
                                 NOAEC:  0.25
                               LOAEC:  >0.25
Egg masses/mated female
               Wilcoxon's Test with Bonferroni's Adjustment
                                  NOAEC:  30
                                  LOAEC:  86
                                 NOAEC:  0.21
                                 LOAEC:  0.25
Eggs per mated female
                       Bonferroni's Adjustment t-test
                                  NOAEC:  30
                                  LOAEC:  86
                                 NOAEC:  0.21
                                 LOAEC:  0.25
Days to oviposition
               Wilcoxon's Test with Bonferroni's Adjustment
                                  NOAEC:  86
                                LOAEC:  >86
                                 NOAEC:  0.25
                               LOAEC:  >0.25

  Endpoint(s) Affected:  eggs per egg mass, egg masses per mated female, and eggs per mated female

13.  VERIFICATION OF STATISTICAL RESULTS:

     Statistical Method:

     The reviewer analyzed the data using CETIS[(TM)] statistical software version <IP_ADDRESS> with database backend settings implemented by EFED on 10/20/2015. The negative and solvent control data were compared using the Equal Variance Two-Sample t-test. Significant differences between negative and solvent controls were detected for the following endpoints: no. eggs/emerged female, no. eggs/primary egg case, % emerged, and egg cases/emerged female. Given these differences, all subsequent analyses were conducted by separately comparing treatment data to the negative and solvent controls for comparison. CETIS summary and analytical output files for each analysis are attached to this DER, outputs note Day 20; however, study measurements were taken on Day 17, this is an artifact of the CETIS template.

     Data were then tested for normality using Shapiro-Wilk's test (α = 0.01) and for homogeneity of variance using Bartlett's test (α = 0.01).  Data that were normal and homogeneous were analyzed via Dunnett's test, and data that were not normal and/or not homogenous were analyzed via the Mann-Whitney U Two-Sample Test, unless otherwise noted.

     Results were expressed as time-weighted average bulk and OC-normalized sediment, overlying, and pore water concentrations.

Based on Comparison to Negative Control
Endpoint*
                                 Bulk Sediment
                                 (mg a.i./kg)
                            OC-Normalized Sediment
                                (mg a.i./g OC)
                                  Pore Water
                                  (mg a.i./L)
                                Overlying Water
                                  (mg a.i./L)
                                  Statistical
                                   Test Used
Day 17 Survival
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                                    Dunnett
Day 17 AFDW
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                                    Dunnett
Time to death
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                              Jonckheere-Terpstra
No. eggs/emerged female*
                                  NOAEC: 1.7
                                  LOAEC: 4.4
                                 NOAEC: 0.081
                                  LOAEC: 0.21
                                 NOAEC: 0.020
                                 LOAEC: 0.061
                                 NOAEC: 0.0020
                                 LOAEC: 0.0036
                                   Williams
No. eggs/primary egg case*
                                NOAEC: <1.7
                                  LOAEC: 1.7
                               NOAEC: <0.081
                                 LOAEC: 0.081
                               NOAEC: <0.020
                                 LOAEC: 0.020
                               NOAEC: <0.0020
                                 LOAEC: 0.0020
                                 Mann-Whitney
% emergence*
                                  NOAEC: 1.7
                                  LOAEC: 4.4
                                 NOAEC: 0.081
                                  LOAEC: 0.21
                                 NOAEC: 0.020
                                 LOAEC: 0.061
                                 NOAEC: 0.0020
                                 LOAEC: 0.0036
                                 Mann-Whitney
Primary Egg cases/emerged female*
                                  NOAEC: 1.7
                                  LOAEC: 4.4
                                 NOAEC: 0.081
                                  LOAEC: 0.21
                                 NOAEC: 0.020
                                 LOAEC: 0.061
                                 NOAEC: 0.0020
                                 LOAEC: 0.0036
                                 Mann-Whitney
Time to oviposition
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                                 Mann-Whitney
* Statistically significant effects for no. of eggs/emerged (mated) female, no. of eggs/primary egg case, % emergence, and primary egg cases/emerged female.

      Based on Comparison to Solvent Control
Endpoint
                                 Bulk Sediment
                                 (mg a.i./kg)
                            OC-Normalized Sediment
                                (mg a.i./g OC)
                                  Pore Water
                                  (mg a.i./L)
                                Overlying Water
                                  (mg a.i./L)
                                  Statistical
                                   Test Used
Day 17 Survival
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                                    Dunnett
Day 17 AFDW
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                                    Dunnett
Time to death
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                              Jonckheere-Terpstra
No. eggs/emerged female
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                                 Mann-Whitney
No. eggs/primary egg case
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                                 Mann-Whitney
% emergence
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                                 Mann-Whitney
Primary Egg cases/emerged female
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                                 Mann-Whitney
Time to oviposition
                                   NOAEC: 84
                                 LOAEC: >84
                                  NOAEC: 4.0
                                LOAEC: >4.0
                                  NOAEC: 0.24
                                LOAEC: >0.24
                                 NOAEC: 0.024
                               LOAEC: >0.024
                                 Mann-Whitney

14.  REVIEWER'S COMMENTS:

The reviewer's and the study author's results were not in agreement. It was determined that the solvent control positively impacted numerous parameters, as noted by the significant differences (and worse performance for negative controls) that were observed between the solvent and negative control for the following parameters: no. eggs/emerged female, no. eggs/primary egg case, % emerged, and egg cases/emerged female. Even for those endpoints where the solvent control was not statistically significantly different from negative controls (other than the time-based endpoints), the solvent control had substantial differences (solvent had mean 24% in biomass, 26% mortality/survival at D17). Therefore, it was determined that the results reported for the negative control were likely the effect of the solvent and not the test substance. There were no treatment-related effects at the highest test level based on the solvent control. Clearly for some endpoints they are impacted by the solvent, but it cannot be ruled out entirely for the other endpoints either, therefore this is an uncertainty of this study, and is considered a study deficiency.  The reviewer determined that the results reported for the negative control were in fact the effect of the solvent and not the test substance, and as a result there were no effects at the highest test level based on the solvent control. The reviewer used the TWA concentrations, while the study authors used the mean-measured concentrations.  The reviewer calculated TWA concentrations given the length of time between measurements of DCPA in the various sample matrices (sediment, and/or water), on test days 0, 17 and 60, respectively.

Although when the results were initially compared to the negative control, the reviewer had determined that there were statistically significant differences for the following endpoints: emergence, no. of eggs/primary egg case, no. of eggs/emerged (mated) female, and no. egg cases/emerged (mated) female. The study authors determined that the observed effects (eggs per egg mass, egg masses per mated female, and eggs per mated female) were not considered to be toxicant related due to the lack of a clear dose response, and that none of the concentrations tested resulted in >=50% reductions. The reviewer's results indicated statistically significant effects at lower treatment levels for no. of eggs/primary egg case and no. of eggs/emerged (mated) female. For % emergence and no. egg cases/emerged (mated) female, the reviewer determined biologically significant reductions at lower test concentrations than those indicated by the statistical analyses of either the reviewer or the study author (the study author's results indicated no effect on emergence).  However, due to the influence of the solvent for numerous endpoints, the reviewer determined that the results reported for the negative control were in fact the effect of the solvent and not the test substance, and as a result there were no effects at the highest test level based on the solvent control.

The study report did not clearly lay out what the difference was between the total # of surviving `midge' and total # of surviving `larvae' in the columns in the day 17 table on page 124. The study author used the total # of surviving `midge' column and the reviewer used the total # of surviving `larvae' to estimate the % survival calculations and statistical analysis. The negative control % survival was 90% and met the control criteria. However, the solvent control % survival was barely below the control criteria of 70% (67%).

Time-weighted average (TWA) concentrations were reviewer-calculated for all matrices (refer to copy of Excel worksheet in Appendix I) and are reported in the Conclusions sections of the DER.  TWA concentrations were calculated by the reviewer using the following equation:

     where:
     C TWA is the time-weighted average concentration,
     C j is the concentration measured at time interval j (j = 0, 1, 2...n)
     t j is the number of hours (or days or weeks, units used just need to be consistent in the equation) of the test at time interval j (e.g., t 0 = 0 hours (test initiation), t 1 =24 hours, t 2 =96 hours).

As per U.S. EPA request, the NOAEC and LOAEC values were also reported in terms of OC-normalized sediment concentrations in the Conclusion section of the DER.  The TOC of the sediment was 2.1%, yielding OC-normalized sediment concentrations of 0.081, 0.21, 0.54, 1.4, and 4.0 mg a.i./g OC (81, 209, 537, 1373, 3981 mg a.i./kg OC). The TWA pore water and overlying water concentrations were 0.020, 0.061, 0.13, 0.22, and 0.24 mg a.i./L, and 0.0020, 0.0036, 0.0073, 0.015, and 0.024 mg a.i./L, respectively.

On test days 23, 26, 30, 38 and 50, the temperature in the test vessels fell to 21°C, below the protocol acceptable range at 23+-1°C.  The temperature of the water bath (continuous measurement) also exceeded the protocol range of either low (21°C) or high (25°C) on days 16, 24, 27, 30, 38, 39, 48, 49, 58 and 59.  It was reported that since the temperatures observed were within the acceptable tolerance of the species and since changes would have occurred at a gradual rate, these deviations did not have a negative impact on the results or interpretation of the study.

Aqueous samples were analyzed for dacthal technical concentration using high performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC/UV) and sediment samples were analyzed using gas chromatography with micro-electron capture detection (GC/uECD) based on methodology validated at Smithers Viscient.  The method validations were conducted prior to the initiation of the definitive study and established average recoveries of 102+-3.90% from artificial sediment and 97.9+-4.86% from filtered seawater.  It was reported that conditions and procedures used throughout the analysis of exposure solutions and QC samples during this study were similar to those used in the method validation studies with the following exception related to analysis of the aqueous samples only:  the calibration curve from the validated method was prepared at concentrations from 0.00200 to 0.0500 mg/L.  Three additional standards at concentrations of 0.100, 0.250 and 0.500 mg/L were added to the calibration curve to better enable the quantitation of the aqueous samples.

The pH and ammonia (as N) were measured in isolated pore water from the negative control level on Days 0, 17 and 60.  Ammonia levels measured 2.5, 1.2 and 1.1 mg/L on Days 0, 17, and 60, respectively.  The pH ranged from 5.9 to 6.8.

The experimental phase of the definitive test was performed from September 11 to November 10, 2015.

This study is scientifically sound and is classified as supplemental and may be used for risk characterization only.

15.  REFERENCES:

	None, other than standard guidelines and methodologies.

APPENDIX I. Copy of Excel Worksheet with TWA Concentrations


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 88 (Friday, May 6, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 27492]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10659]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Public Availability of the Department of Transportation FY 2015
Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of Public Availability of FY 2015 Service Contract
Inventories.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 743 of Division C of the
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010, Public Law 111-117, Department
of Transportation is publishing this notice to advise the public of the
availability of the FY 2015 Service Contact Inventory data, the summary
spreadsheet, the supplement, the analysis of the FY 2014 data and the
plan for analyzing the FY 2015 data. This inventory provides
information on service contract actions over $25,000 awarded in FY
2015. The information is organized by function to show how contracted
resources are distributed throughout the agency.
    The inventory has been developed in accordance with guidance issued
on November 5, 2010 by the Office of Management and Budget's Office of
Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at
https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/procurement/memo/service-contract-inventories-guidance-11052010.pdf. Department of
Transportation has posted its FY 2015 Service Contact Inventory data,
the summary spreadsheet, the supplement, the analysis of the FY 2014
data and the plan for analyzing the FY 2015 data on the Department of
Transportation's homepage at the following link:  https://www.transportation.gov/assistant-secretary-administration/procurement/service-contract-inventory. Questions regarding the Service Contract
Inventory should be directed to Diane Morrison in the Office of the
Senior Procurement Executive at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: April 13, 2016.
Gregory Cate,
Deputy Director, Office of Senior Procurement Executive.
[FR Doc. 2016-10659 Filed 5-5-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 16, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 52301]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22496]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2018-0100; Notice No. 2018-18]

Hazardous Materials: Emergency Waiver No. 8

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice of emergency waiver order.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: PHMSA is issuing an emergency waiver order to persons
conducting operations under the direction of Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 4 or United States Coast Guard (USCG) Seventh or
Eighth Districts within the Hurricane Michael emergency area of
Georgia. The Waiver is granted to support the EPA and USCG in taking
appropriate actions to prepare for, respond to, and recover from a
threat to public health, welfare, or the environment caused by actual
or potential oil and hazardous materials incidents resulting from
Hurricane Michael. This Waiver Order is effective immediately and shall
remain in effect for 30 days from the date of issuance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adam Horsley, Deputy Assistant Chief
Counsel for Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with the provisions of 49
U.S.C. 5103(c), the Administrator for PHMSA, hereby declares that an
emergency exists that warrants issuance of a Waiver of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR, 49 CFR parts 171-180) to persons conducting
operations under the direction of EPA Region 4 or USCG Seventh or
Eighth Districts within the Hurricane Michael emergency area of
Georgia. The Waiver is granted to support the EPA and USCG in taking
appropriate actions to prepare for, respond to, and recover from a
threat to public health, welfare, or the environment caused by actual
or potential oil and hazardous materials incidents resulting from
Hurricane Michael.
    On October 10, 2018, the President issued an Emergency Declaration
for Hurricane Michael for Georgia for the counties of Appling,
Atkinson, Bacon, Baker, Baldwin, Ben Hill, Berrien, Bibb, Bleckley,
Brantley, Brooks, Bryan, Bulloch, Burke, Butts, Calhoun, Camden,
Candler, Charlton, Chatham, Chattahoochee, Clarke, Clay, Clinch,
Coffee, Colquitt, Columbia, Cook, Crawford, Crisp, Decatur, Dodge,
Dooly, Dougherty, Early, Echols, Effingham, Elbert, Emanuel, Evans,
Glascock, Glynn, Grady, Greene, Hancock, Houston, Irwin, Jasper, Jeff
Davis, Jefferson, Jenkins, Johnson, Jones, Lamar, Lanier, Laurens, Lee,
Liberty, Lincoln, Long, Lowndes, Macon, Marion, McDuffie, McIntosh,
Miller, Mitchell, Monroe, Montgomery, Morgan, Muscogee, Oconee,
Oglethorpe, Peach, Pierce, Pulaski, Putnam, Quitman, Randolph,
Richmond, Schley, Screven, Seminole, Stewart, Sumter, Talbot,
Taliaferro, Tattnall, Taylor, Telfair, Terrell, Thomas, Tift, Toombs,
Treutlen, Turner, Twiggs, Upson, Ware, Warren, Washington, Wayne,
Webster, Wheeler, Wilcox, Wilkes, Wilkinson, and Worth (EM-3406).
    This Waiver Order covers all areas identified in the declaration,
as amended. Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 5103(c), PHMSA has authority
delegated by the Secretary (49 CFR 1.97(b)(3)) to waive compliance with
any part of the HMR provided that the grant of the waiver is: (1) In
the public interest; (2) not inconsistent with the safety of
transporting hazardous materials; and (3) necessary to facilitate the
safe movement of hazardous materials into, from, and within an area of
a major disaster or emergency that has been declared under the Robert
T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act (42 U.S.C.
5121 et seq.).
    Given the continuing impacts caused by Hurricane Michael, PHMSA's
Administrator has determined that regulatory relief is in the public
interest and necessary to ensure the safe transportation in commerce of
hazardous materials while the EPA and USCG execute their recovery and
cleanup efforts in Georgia. Specifically, PHMSA's Administrator finds
that issuing this Waiver Order will allow the EPA and USCG to conduct
their Emergency Support Function #10 response activities under the
National Response Framework to safely remove, transport, and dispose of
hazardous materials. By execution of this Waiver Order, persons
conducting operations under the direction of EPA Region 4 or USCG
Seventh or Eighth Districts within the Hurricane Michael emergency area
of Georgia are authorized to offer and transport non-radioactive
hazardous materials under alternative safety requirements imposed by
EPA Region 4 or USCG Seventh or Eighth Districts when compliance with
the HMR is not practicable. Under this Waiver Order, non-radioactive
hazardous materials may be transported to staging areas within 50 miles
of the point of origin. Further transportation of the hazardous
materials from staging areas must be in full compliance with the HMR.
    This Waiver Order is effective immediately and shall remain in
effect for 30 days from the date of issuance.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 11, 2018.
Howard R. Elliott,
Administrator, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.
[FR Doc. 2018-22496 Filed 10-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 78 (Tuesday, April 23, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16920-16921]
[FR Doc No: 2019-08067]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Investment Company Act Release No. 33449; File No. 812-14970]

Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust, et al.

April 17, 2019.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') for an exemption from section 19(b) of
the Act and rule 19b-1 under the Act to permit registered closed-end
investment companies to make periodic distributions of long-term
capital gains more frequently than permitted by section 19(b) or rule
19b-1.
    Applicants: Putnam Managed Municipal Income Trust (``PMM''), a
diversified closed-end investment company registered under the Act and
organized as a Massachusetts business trust; Putnam Master Intermediate
Income Trust (``PIM''), a diversified closed-end investment company
registered under the Act and organized as a Massachusetts business
trust; Putnam Municipal Opportunities Trust (``PMO''), a non-
diversified closed-end investment company registered under the Act and
organized as a Massachusetts business trust; Putnam Premier Income
Trust (``PPT,'' and together with PMM, PIM, and PMO, the ``Funds''), a
non-diversified closed-end investment company registered under the Act
and organized as a Massachusetts business trust; Putnam Investment
Management, LLC (``Putnam Management''), a limited liability company
organized under the laws of Massachusetts; and Putnam Investments
Limited (``Putnam Investments,'' and together with Putnam Management,
the ``Advisers''), a private limited company organized under the laws
of the United Kingdom, each of Putnam Management and Putnam Investments
registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and serving as
investment adviser and sub-adviser to the Funds, respectively (the
Advisers, together with the Funds, the ``Applicants'').\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Applicants request that the order also apply to each other
registered closed-end investment company advised or to be advised in
the future by Putnam Management, Putnam Investments, or by an entity
controlling, controlled by, or under common control (within the
meaning of section 2(a)(9) of the Act) with Putnam Management or
Putnam Investments (including any successor in interest) (each such
entity, including the Advisers, also the ``Adviser'') that in the
future seeks to rely on the order (such investment companies,
together with the Funds, are collectively the ``Funds'' and,
individually, a ``Fund''). A successor in interest is limited to
entities that result from a reorganization into another jurisdiction
or a change in the type of business organization.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Filing Dates: The application was filed on November 6, 2018, and
amended on March 18, 2019.
    Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the
application will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by writing to the Commission's
Secretary and serving applicants with a copy of the request, personally
or by mail. Hearing requests should be received by the Commission by
5:30 p.m. on May 13, 2019, and should be accompanied by proof of
service on applicants, in the form of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Pursuant to Rule 0-5 under the Act, hearing
requests should state the nature of the writer's interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a hearing on the matter, the reason
for the request, and the issues contested. Persons who wish to be
notified of a hearing may request notification by writing to the
Commission's Secretary.

ADDRESSES: The Commission: Secretary, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090. Applicants:
Bryan Chegwidden, Esq., Ropes & Gray LLP, 1211 Avenue of the Americas,
New York, New York 10036 and Robert T. Burns, Vice President, Putnam
Investment Management, LLC, 100 Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts
02110.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jill Ehrlich, Senior Counsel at (202)
551-6819, or Andrea Ottomanelli Magovern, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-
6821 (Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number, or for an
applicant using the Company name box, at http://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Summary of the Application

    1. Section 19(b) of the Act generally makes it unlawful for any
registered investment company to make long-term capital gains
distributions more than once every twelve months. Rule 19b-1 under the
Act limits to one the number of capital gain dividends, as defined in
section 852(b)(3)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (``Code,''
and such dividends, ``distributions''), that a

registered investment company may make with respect to any one taxable
year, plus a supplemental distribution made pursuant to section 855 of
the Code not exceeding 10% of the total amount distributed for the
year, plus one additional capital gain dividend made in whole or in
part to avoid the excise tax under section 4982 of the Code.
    2. Applicants believe that investors in certain closed-end funds
may prefer an investment vehicle that provides regular current income
through a fixed distribution policy (``Distribution Policy'').
Applicants propose that a Fund be permitted to adopt a Distribution
Policy, pursuant to which the Fund would distribute periodically (as
frequently as twelve times in a taxable year) to its common
stockholders a fixed percentage of the market price of the Fund's
common stock at a particular point in time or a fixed percentage of net
asset value (``NAV'') at a particular time or a fixed amount per share
of common stock, any of which may be adjusted from time to time.
    3. Applicants request an order under section 6(c) of the Act
granting an exemption from section 19(b) of the Act and rule 19b-1 to
permit a Fund to distribute periodic capital gain dividends (as defined
in section 852(b)(3)(C) of the Code) as frequently as twelve times in
any one taxable year in respect of its common stock and as often as
specified by, or determined in accordance with the terms of, any
preferred stock issued by the Fund. Section 6(c) of the Act provides,
in relevant part, that the Commission may exempt any person or
transaction from any provision of the Act to the extent that such
exemption is necessary or appropriate in the public interest and
consistent with the protection of investors and the purposes fairly
intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
    4. Applicants state that any order granting the requested relief
will be subject to the terms and conditions stated in the application,
which generally are designed to address the concerns underlying section
19(b) and rule 19b-1, including concerns about proper disclosures and
shareholders' understanding of the source(s) of a Fund's distributions
and concerns about improper sales practices. Among other things, such
terms and conditions require that (1) the board of directors or
trustees of the Fund (the ``Board'') review such information as is
reasonably necessary to make an informed determination of whether to
adopt the proposed Distribution Policy and that the Board periodically
review the amount of the distributions in light of the investment
experience of the Fund, and (2) that the Fund's shareholders receive
appropriate disclosures concerning the distributions.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-08067 Filed 4-22-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P