[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 135 (Tuesday, July 15, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 41101-41104]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15435]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0867; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-115-AD;
Amendment 39-17853; AD 2014-11-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, and -300ER series
airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of severe corrosion on
bonding jumpers installed on the flight control surfaces. This AD
requires repetitive bonding jumper inspections for corrosion, sealant
disbond, and insufficient sealant coverage; and corrective actions if
necessary. This AD also specifies an optional inspection for corrosion
damage of the bonding brackets, and corrective actions if necessary,
which would terminate the repetitive inspections. For certain
airplanes, this AD requires installing certain bonding jumpers, and
replacing single-tabbed brackets with two-tabbed brackets. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct corrosion on bonding jumpers
installed on the flight control surfaces, which, in the event of a
lightning strike, could damage the actuator control electronics (ACEs)
and result in the loss of the ability to command individual flight
control surfaces or cause uncommanded motion of individual flight
control surfaces.

DATES: This AD is effective August 19, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of August 19,
2014.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services Management,
P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207; telephone 206-544-
5000, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013-
0867; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Georgios Roussos, Aerospace Engineer,
Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone: 425-
917-6482; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 777-200, -200LR, -300, and -300ER series airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on October 25, 2013 (78 FR 63903).
The NPRM was prompted by reports of severe corrosion on bonding jumpers
installed on the flight control surfaces. The NPRM proposed to require
repetitive bonding jumper inspections for corrosion, sealant disbond,
and insufficient sealant coverage; and corrective actions if necessary.
The NPRM also specified an optional inspection for corrosion damage of
the bonding brackets, and corrective actions if necessary, which would
terminate the repetitive inspections. For certain airplanes, the NPRM
proposed installing certain bonding jumpers, and replacing single-
tabbed brackets with two-tabbed brackets. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct corrosion on bonding jumpers installed on the flight
control surfaces, which, in the event of a lightning strike, could
damage the ACEs and result in the loss of the ability to command
individual flight control surfaces or cause uncommanded motion of
individual flight control surfaces.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. The following presents the comments received on the proposal
(78 FR 63903, October 25, 2013) and the FAA's response to each comment.

Request To Base Compliance Time on AD Issue Date

    American Airlines (AAL) requested that paragraph (f) of the
proposed AD (78 FR 63903, October 25, 2013) be revised to allow
operators to comply with Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision
1, dated April 1, 2013, within 36 months after the AD effective date.
AAL stated that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated
September 10, 2009, was issued with a compliance time of 36 months from
the original release of the service bulletin. AAL explained that after
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated September 10, 2009,
was released, Boeing accomplished a service bulletin validation on
another operator's airplane and found many discrepancies and errors
with the work instructions and parts required, resulting in Revision 1
of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated April 1, 2013. AAL stated
that due to the issues still existing in the work instructions for
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated September 10, 2009,
and a long lead time on the part kits, operators will be unable to
accomplish Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1, dated April
1, 2013, by the compliance time given without severe disruption of
schedules.
    We agree with the commenter's request. We agree that the compliance
time should be based on the effective date of this final rule and not
on the original issue date of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078,
Revision 1, dated April 1, 2013. We had already included this
information in the proposed AD (78 FR 63903, October 25, 2013),
paragraph (j)(1) of this AD, as

reiterated from the proposed AD, states that where Boeing Service
Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2013, specifies a
compliance time after the ``Original issue date of this service
bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance within the specified compliance
time after the ``effective date of this AD''. Therefore, no change is
required for this AD in this regard.

Request To Revise Repetitive Inspection Interval

    Boeing requested that we revise paragraph (g) of the proposed AD
(78 FR 63903, October 25, 2013) to extend the compliance time for the
repetitive inspections from 48 months to 1,500 days in order to allow
operators to do these inspections at the same time as other inspections
which are on a 1,500-day cycle mandated by the Model 777 airplane
maintenance planning document. Boeing stated that current guidance on
developing a compliance recommendation requires that airline
maintenance inspection intervals (AMII) be taken into account when
determining the compliance time. Boeing explained that for the Model
777 series airplanes, these AMII are given in calendar days and cycles,
and that deviation from the AMII requires justification. Boeing stated
that since no such justification exists, if the compliance time were to
be determined today, it would be 1,500 days (4 maintenance years)
instead of 48 months (4 calendar years).
    We agree with the commenter's request. The requested change to the
repetitive inspection interval meets the compliance time that has been
determined for addressing the identified unsafe condition, while taking
into account fleet-established maintenance intervals. We have revised
paragraph (g) of this AD to specify a repetitive inspection interval of
1,500 days.

Request to Clarify Inspection Method

    United Airlines (UAL) requested that we revise paragraph (g) of the
proposed AD (78 FR 63903, October 25, 2013), which specifies to do a
detailed inspection using a borescope if the horizontal stabilizer tips
have not been removed. UAL requested that we clarify the required
action by including ``as applicable'' or by noting that this borescope
inspection applies only to bonding jumper number 10.
    We infer that the commenter refers to the work instructions in
Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2013,
that identify the option of using a borescope to inspect bonding jumper
10 if the horizontal stabilizer tips have not been removed. We agree
with the commenter's request. The use of a borescope is intended for
bonding jumper 10, and not for all bonding jumpers. We have revised
paragraph (g) of this AD to specify doing the detailed inspection using
a borescope if the horizontal stabilizer tips have not been removed.

Revisions Made to This Final Rule

    We have revised the Costs of Compliance in this final rule to
specify only the mandated actions, since we have no definitive data for
the on-condition costs. We have also revised the concurrent cost
estimates by including the estimated number of airplanes on which those
actions must be accomplished.
    We have revised paragraph (h)(1) of this AD to clarify that the
optional terminating action for Option 2 includes replacing bonding
jumpers.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this AD with the changes described previously and minor editorial
changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 63903, October 25, 2013) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 63903, October 25, 2013).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 131 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost        Parts cost      Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of bonding jumpers....  Up to 67                         $0  Up to $5,695 per     Up to $746,045 per
(131 airplanes)..................   work[dash]hours x                    inspection cycle.    inspection cycle.
                                    $85 per hour = Up
                                    to $5,695 per
                                    inspection cycle.
Concurrent action; Boeing Service  66 work[dash]hours            2,668  $8,278.............  $281,452.
 Bulletin 777[dash]55A0010,         x $85 per hour =
 Revision 1, dated April 17, 2001.  $5,610.
(34 airplanes)...................
Concurrent action; Boeing Service  21 work[dash]hours            1,235  $3,020.............  $253,680.
 Bulletin 777[dash]55A0014,         x $85 per hour =
 Revision 1, dated April 1, 2010.   $1,785.
(84 airplanes)...................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that would enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition actions and optional terminating
actions specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2014-11-03 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-17853; Docket No. FAA-
2013-0867; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-115-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective August 19, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD affects AD 2012-08-13, Amendment 39-17030 (77 FR 24357,
April 24, 2012).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 777-200, -200LR, -
300, and -300ER series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1, dated
April 1, 2013.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
Controls.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of severe corrosion on bonding
jumpers installed on the flight control surfaces. We are issuing
this AD to detect and correct corrosion on bonding jumpers installed
on the flight control surfaces, which, in the event of a lightning
strike, could damage the actuator control electronics (ACEs) and
result in the loss of the ability to command individual flight
control surfaces or cause uncommanded motion of individual flight
control surfaces.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Bonding Jumper or Bracket Inspection

    At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph 1.E.,
``Compliance,'' of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1,
dated April 1, 2013, except as specified in paragraphs (j)(1) and
(j)(2) of this AD: Do a general visual inspection or a detailed
inspection, including a borescopic inspection as applicable, for
corrosion, sealant disbond, and insufficient sealant coverage of
bonding jumpers; and do all applicable corrective actions; in
accordance with Option 1, and Option 2, as applicable, of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078,
Revision 1, dated April 1, 2013, except as required by paragraph
(j)(3) of this AD. Do a detailed inspection using a borescope of
bonding jumper 10 if the horizontal stabilizer tips have not been
removed. Do all applicable corrective actions before further flight.
Repeat the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 1,500
days. Doing the actions specified in paragraph (h)(1) of this AD on
a bonding jumper terminates the repetitive inspections required by
this paragraph. Doing the actions specified in paragraph (h)(2) of
this AD terminates repetitive inspections required by this paragraph
for that bonding jumper.

(h) Optional Terminating Actions

    (1) Doing a general visual inspection or a detailed inspection
for corrosion damage of the bonding jumper brackets, replacing
bonding jumpers, and all applicable corrective actions; in
accordance with Option 2 of the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1, dated April 1,
2013; terminates the repetitive inspections required by paragraph
(g) of this AD. Do all applicable corrective actions before further
flight.
    (2) The repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this
AD are not required on the bonding jumpers that were removed,
inspected, and replaced with new bonding jumpers and new fasteners
using the new category 2 fay sealed direct standard ground stud
installation method, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1,
dated April 1, 2013.

(i) Prior and Concurrent Requirements

    (1) For Group 1 airplanes, as identified in Boeing Service
Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2013: Prior to or
concurrently with accomplishing the actions required by paragraph
(g) of this AD, install new bonding jumpers, and do resistance
measurements of the modified installation to verify resistance is
within the limits specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of
Boeing Service Bulletin 777-55A0010, Revision 1, dated April 17,
2001. Do the actions in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-55A0010, Revision 1,
dated April 17, 2001.

    Note 1 to paragraph (i)(1) of this AD: AD 2012-08-13, Amendment
39-17030 (77 FR 24357, April 24, 2012), refers to Boeing Service
Bulletin 777-55A0010, Revision 1, dated April 17, 2001, as the
appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the
actions specified in paragraph (h) of AD 2012-08-13.

    (2) For Group 1 and Group 2 airplanes, as identified in Boeing
Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2013: Prior
to or concurrently with accomplishing the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, replace certain single-tabbed bonding
brackets in the airplane empennage with two-tabbed bonding brackets,
in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Service
Bulletin 777-55A0014, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2010.

    Note 2 to paragraph (i)(2) of this AD: AD 2012-08-13, Amendment
39-17030 (77 FR 24357, April 24, 2012), refers to Boeing Service
Bulletin 777-55A0014, Revision 1, dated April 1, 2010, as the
appropriate source of service information for accomplishing the
actions specified in paragraph (g) of AD 2012-08-13.

(j) Exceptions to Service Information

    (1) Where Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1, dated
April 1, 2013, specifies a compliance time after the ``Original
issue date of this service bulletin,'' this AD requires compliance
within the specified compliance time after the effective date of
this AD.
    (2) The ``Condition'' column in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,''
of Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1, dated April 1,
2013, refers to a condition as of the ``Original Issue date of this
service bulletin.'' This AD applies to the corresponding condition
as of the effective date of this AD.
    (3) If any corrosion damage is found during any inspection
required by this AD, and Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078,
Revision 1, dated April 1, 2013, specifies to contact Boeing for
appropriate action: Before further flight, repair the corrosion
damage using a method approved in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (l) of this AD.

(k) Credit for Previous Actions

    (1) For Groups 1, 2, and 6 through 9, as identified in Boeing
Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated September 10, 2009: This
paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph (g) of
this AD and the actions specified in paragraph (h) of this AD, if
those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD
using Boeing Alert

Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated September 10, 2009, which is not
incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (2) For Groups 3 through 5, as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated September 10, 2009: This
paragraph provides credit for actions required by paragraph (g) of
this AD, except for the actions required for bonding jumpers 21 and
22, if those actions were performed before the effective date of
this AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated
September 10, 2009, which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD. If a review of the airplane's maintenance records positively
determines that bonding jumpers 21 and 22 were inspected before the
effective date of this AD in accordance with Option 1 of Work
Package 3 of the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Service
Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated September 10, 2009, this paragraph
provides credit for the actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD
for the inspected bonding jumpers.
    (3) For Groups 3 through 5, as identified in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated September 10, 2009: This
paragraph provides credit for actions specified in paragraph (h) of
this AD, if those actions were performed before the effective date
of this AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated
September 10, 2009, which is not incorporated by reference in this
AD; provided that a review of the airplane's maintenance records
positively determines that bonding jumpers 21 and 22 were replaced
in accordance with Option 2 of Work Package 3 of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, dated
September 10, 2009, or were replaced using the new Category 2 fay
sealed direct ground stud installation method.
    (4) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraph (i)(1) of this AD if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777-55A0010, dated October 26, 2000, which is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
    (5) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD if those actions were performed before
the effective date of this AD using Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
777-55A0014, dated May 8, 2008, which is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.

(l) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14
CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the manager of the ACO, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (m)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your Principal
Maintenance Inspector or Principal Avionics Inspector, as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair required by this AD if it is approved by the
Boeing Commercial Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization
that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle ACO, to make those
findings. For a repair method to be approved, the repair must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

 (m) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Georgios
Roussos, Aerospace Engineer, Systems and Equipment Branch, ANM-130S,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA 98057-3356; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference may be viewed at the addresses specified
in paragraphs (n)(3) and (n)(4) of this AD.

(n) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Service Bulletin 777-27A0078, Revision 1, dated April
1, 2013.
    (ii) Boeing Service Bulletin 777-55A0010, Revision 1, dated
April 17, 2001.
    (iii) Boeing Service Bulletin 777-55A0014, Revision 1, dated
April 1, 2010.
    (3) For Boeing service information identified in this AD,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H-65, Seattle, WA 98124-2207;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, extension 1; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 14, 2014.
Michael J. Kaszycki,
Acting Manager Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-15435 Filed 7-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 122 (Tuesday, June 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29867-29869]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13433]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2018-D-4534]

Reducing Microbial Food Safety Hazards in the Production of Seed
for Sprouting: Draft Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Reducing
Microbial Food Safety Hazards in the Production of Seed for

Sprouting.'' The draft guidance document, when finalized, will make the
sprout seed industry (seed growers, conditioners, packers, holders,
suppliers, and distributors) aware of FDA's serious concern with the
continuing outbreaks of foodborne illness associated with the
consumption of raw and lightly-cooked sprouts and provide FDA's
recommendations to firms throughout the production chain of seed for
sprouting.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments on the draft
guidance by August 26, 2019 to ensure that FDA considers your comment
on the draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments on any guidance at any time as
follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2018-D-4534 for ``Reducing Microbial Food Safety Hazards in the
Production of Seed for Sprouting: Draft Guidance for Industry.''
Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' We will review
this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in our
consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be available for
public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name
and contact information to be made publicly available, you can provide
this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your
comments and you must identify this information as ``confidential.''
Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except
in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law.
For more information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets,
see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at:
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of the draft guidance to
the Office of Food Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied
Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park,
MD 20740. Send two self-addressed adhesive labels to assist that office
in processing your request. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
for electronic access to the draft guidance.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Homola, Center for Food
Safety and Applied Nutrition, Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Dr., College Park, MD 20740,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    We are announcing the availability of a draft guidance for industry
entitled ``Reducing Microbial Food Safety Hazards in the Production of
Seed for Sprouting.'' The draft guidance, when finalized, will make the
sprout seed industry (seed growers, conditioners, packers, holders,
suppliers, and distributors) aware of our serious concern with the
continuing outbreaks of foodborne illness associated with the
consumption of raw and lightly-cooked sprouts and provide our
recommendations to firms throughout the production chain of seed for
sprouting. In the development of the draft guidance, we considered
three documents related to food safety and hygienic production of seed
for sprouting: (1) The Codex Code of Hygienic Practice for Fresh Fruits
and Vegetables Annex II, Annex for Sprout Production (Ref. 1); (2) the
International Sprout Growers Association--Institute for Food Safety and
Health's ``U.S. Sprout Production Best Practices'' (Section 2. Raw
Material Sourcing) (Ref. 2); and (3) the European Sprouted Seeds
Association (ESSA) Hygiene Guideline for the Production of Sprouts and
Seeds for Sprouting (Section 2. Production of Seeds) (Ref. 3). We have
incorporated aspects of these documents that are consistent with our
laws and regulations, as well as our existing policies.
    We are issuing the draft guidance consistent with our good guidance
practice regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance, when
finalized, will represent our current thinking on this topic. It does
not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or
the public. You can use an alternate approach if it satisfies the
requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations. This guidance
is not subject to Executive Order 12866.

II. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the draft guidance
at either https://www.fda.gov/FoodGuidances or https://www.regulations.gov. Use the FDA website listed in the previous

sentence to find the most current version of the guidance.

III. References

    The following references are on display at the Dockets Management
Staff (see ADDRESSES) and are available for viewing by interested
persons between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday; they are also
available electronically at https://www.regulations.gov. FDA has
verified the website addresses, as of the date this document publishes
in the Federal Register, but websites are subject to change over time.
    1. Codex ``Code of Hygienic Practice for Fresh Fruits and
Vegetables,'' CAC/RCP 53-2003, Annex II, Annex for Sprout Production,
Revision 2010. Retrieved from https://www.ifsh.iit.edu/sites/ifsh/files/departments/ssa/pdfs/codex2003_053e.pdf.
    2. International Sprout Growers Association--Institute for Food
Safety and Health's ``U.S. Sprout Production Best Practices'' (Section
2. Raw Material Sourcing). Retrieved from https://www.ifsh.iit.edu/us-sprout-industry-production-best-practices.
    3. Official Journal of the European Union, ``ESSA Hygiene Guideline
for the Production of Sprouts and Seeds for Sprouting (2017/(220/03),''
(Section 2. Production of Seeds). Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?uri=CELEX:52017XX0708(01)&from=EN.

    Dated: June 19, 2019.
Lowell J. Schiller,
Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2019-13433 Filed 6-24-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 53 (Thursday, March 19, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 14421]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06265]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-74507; File Nos. SR-NYSE-2011-55; SR-NYSEAmex-2011-84]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; NYSE
MKT LLC; Order Granting an Extension to Limited Exemptions From Rule
612(c) of Regulation NMS in Connection With the Exchanges' Retail
Liquidity Programs Until September 30, 2015

March 13, 2015.
    On July 3, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') issued an order pursuant to its authority under Rule
612(c) of Regulation NMS (``Sub-Penny Rule'') \1\ that granted the New
York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'') and NYSE MKT LLC \2\ (``NYSE MKT''
and, together with NYSE, the ``Exchanges'') limited exemptions from the
Sub-Penny Rule in connection with the operation of the Exchanges'
respective Retail Liquidity Programs (the ``Programs'').\3\ The limited
exemptions were granted concurrently with the Commission's approval of
the Exchanges' proposals to adopt their respective Programs for one-
year pilot terms.\4\ The exemptions were granted coterminous with the
effectiveness of the pilot Programs; both the pilot Programs and
exemptions are scheduled to expire on March 31, 2015.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 17 CFR 242.612(c).
    \2\ At the time it filed the original proposal to adopt the
Retail Liquidity Program, NYSE MKT went by the name NYSE Amex LLC.
On May 14, 2012, the Exchange filed a proposed rule change,
immediately effective upon filing, to change its name from NYSE Amex
LLC to NYSE MKT LLC. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67037
(May 21, 2012), 77 FR 31415 (May 25, 2012) (SR-NYSEAmex-2012-32).
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 67347 (July 3,
2012), 77 FR 40673 (July 10, 2012) (SR-NYSE-2011-55; SR-NYSEAmex-
2011-84) (``Order'').
    \4\ See id.
    \5\ The pilot term of the Programs was originally scheduled to
end on July 31, 2013, but the Exchanges initially extended the term
for an additional year, through July 31, 2014, see Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 70096 (August 2, 2013), 78 FR 48520
(August 8, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-48), and 70100 (August 2, 2013), 78
FR 48535 (August 8, 2013) (SR-NYSEMKT-2013-60), and then
subsequently extended the term again through March 31, 2015, see
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 72629 (July 16, 2014), 79 FR
42564 (July 22, 2014) (SR-NYSE-2014-35), and 72625 (July 16, 2014),
79 FR 42566 (July 22, 2014) (SR-NYSEMKT-2014-60). Each time the
pilot term of the Programs was extended, the Commission granted the
Exchanges' requests to also extend the Sub-Penny Exemption through
July 31, 2014, see Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70085 (July
31, 2013), 78 FR 47807 (August 6, 2013), and March 31, 2015, see
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 72732 (July 31, 2014), 79 FR
45851 (August 6, 2014), respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchanges now seek to extend the exemptions until September 30,
2015.\6\ The Exchanges' request was made in conjunction with
immediately effective filings that extend the operation of the Programs
through the same date.\7\ In their request to extend the exemptions,
the Exchanges note that the participation in the Programs has increased
more recently. Accordingly, the Exchanges have asked for additional
time to allow themselves and the Commission to analyze more robust data
concerning the Programs, which the Exchanges committed to provide to
the Commission.\8\ For this reason and the reasons stated in the Order
originally granting the limited exemptions, the Commission finds that
extending the exemptions, pursuant to its authority under Rule 612(c)
of Regulation NMS, is appropriate in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Letter from Martha Redding, Senior Counsel, NYSE, to
Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission,
dated February 27, 2015.
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 34-74454 (March 6,
2015), 80 FR 13054 (March 12, 2015) (SR-NYSE-2015-10), and 34-74455
(March 6, 2015), 80 FR 13047 (March 12, 2015) (SR-NYSEMKT-2015-14).
    \8\ See Order, supra note 3, 77 FR at 40681.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Therefore, it is hereby ordered that, pursuant to Rule 612(c) of
Regulation NMS, each Exchange is granted a limited exemption from Rule
612 of Regulation NMS that allows it to accept and rank orders priced
equal to or greater than $1.00 per share in increments of $0.001, in
connection with the operation of its Retail Liquidity Program, until
September 30, 2015.
    The limited and temporary exemptions extended by this Order are
subject to modification or revocation if at any time the Commission
determines that such action is necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Responsibility
for compliance with any applicable provisions of the Federal securities
laws must rest with the persons relying on the exemptions that are the
subject of this Order.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(83).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-06265 Filed 3-18-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 28 (Friday, February 10, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7007-7010]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3105]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0111; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-089-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Model A330-200 series airplanes; Model A330-300 series
airplanes, Model A340-200 series airplanes; Model A340-300 series
airplanes; Model A340-541 airplanes; and Model A340-642 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by reports of cracks in the bogie pivot pin
caused by material heating due to friction between the bogie pivot pin
and bush. This proposed AD would require performing a detailed
inspection for degradation of the bogie pivot pins and pivot pin bushes
of the main and central landing gear for any cracks and damage, and
repairing or replacing bogie pivot pins and pivot pin bushes, if
necessary. We are proposing this AD to correct and detect cracks and
damage to the main and central landing gear, which could result in the
collapse of the landing gear and adversely affect the airplane's
continued safe flight and landing.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 26, 2012.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey

Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61
93 45 80; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You may review copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue SW., Renton, Washington. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1138; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2012-0111;
Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-089-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2011-0040, dated March 8, 2011 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    During removals of A330/340 Main Landing Gear Bogie Beams and
A340-500/600 Centre Landing Gear Bogie Beams, cracks in the Bogie
Pivot Pin (BPP) have been found.
    Investigations indicated that the main root cause is material
heating due to friction between bogie pivot pin and bush.
Consequences of that heating are chrome detachment and stress
corrosion cracking (SCC).
    This situation, if not corrected, could result in the collapse
of the main or central landing gear.
    As a precautionary measure, this [EASA] AD requires a one-time
[detailed] inspection of the main landing gear (all types of A330
and A340) and central landing gear (A340-500/600 only) to detect
degradation * * * of the BPP [and cracks and damages of the bushes],
as applicable to aeroplane model, and the reporting of inspections
results.

    Required actions also include, for certain airplanes, a magnetic
particle inspection of the bogie pivot pin for corrosion and base metal
cracks. The corrective actions include replacing any cracked or damaged
pivot pin bush with a new or serviceable pivot pin bush, and replacing
any corroded or cracked bogie pin with a new bogie pin. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued the following service bulletins:
     Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-32-3240, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A330-200 series airplanes
and Model A330-300 series airplanes);
     Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-4281, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A340-200 series airplanes
and Model A340-300 series airplanes); and
     Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-5096, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A340-541 airplanes and
A340-642 airplanes).
    The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 29 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 22 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $85 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $54,230, or $1,870 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 6 work-hours and require parts costing $21,222, for a cost
of $21,732 per product. We have no way of determining the number of
products that may need these actions.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:

    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2012-0111; Directorate Identifier 2011-NM-
089-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by March 26, 2012.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -
243, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343
airplanes; Model A340-211, -212, and -213 airplanes; Model A340-311,
-312, and -313 airplanes; Model A340-541 airplanes; and Model A340-
642 airplanes; certificated in any category; all manufacturer serial
numbers, except those on which Airbus modification 54500 has been
embodied in production.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
Gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracks in the bogie pivot pin
caused by material heating due to friction between the bogie pivot
pin and bush. We are issuing this AD to correct and detect cracks
and damage to the main and central landing gear, which could result
in the collapse of the landing gear and adversely affect the
airplane's continued safe flight and landing.

(f) Compliance

    You are responsible for having the actions required by this AD
performed within the compliance times specified, unless the actions
have already been done.

(g) Inspection

    Within 26 months after the effective date of this AD or within
26 months after the first flight of the airplane, whichever occurs
later; but no earlier than 12 months after the first flight of the
airplane: Do a detailed inspection for degradation of the bogie
pivot pins and pivot pin bushes of the main and central landing
gear, for any cracks and damage (i.e., loss of chromium plate, loose
chromium, sharp edges), in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of the applicable service bulletin specified in
paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD.
    (1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-32-3240, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A330-200 series
airplanes and Model A330-300 series airplanes).
    (2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-4281, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Airbus Model A340-200 series
airplanes and Model A340-300 series airplanes).
    (3) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-5096, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A340-541 airplanes and
A340-642 airplanes).

(h) Corrective Action

    If, during the inspection specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
any pivot pin bush is found cracked or damaged: Before further
flight, record all findings (both positive and negative), as
required by paragraph (k) of this AD, and repair or replace the
pivot pin bush with a new or serviceable pivot pin bush, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
service bulletin specified paragraph (h)(1), (h)(2), or (h)(3) of
this AD.
    (1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-32-3240, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A330-200 series
airplanes and Model A330-300 series airplanes).
    (2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-4281, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Airbus Model A340-200 series
airplanes and Model A340-300 series airplanes).
    (3) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-5096, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A340-541 airplanes and
A340-642 airplanes).

(i) Record Findings and Inspection

    If, during the inspection specified in paragraph (g) of this AD,
degraded chrome plating on any bogie pivot pin is found: Before
further flight, record findings (both positive and negative), as
required by paragraph (k) of this AD, and do a non-destructive test
(magnetic particle inspection) of the affected bogie pivot pin for
corrosion and base metal cracks, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service bulletin
specified paragraph (i)(1), (i)(2), or (i)(3) of this AD.
    (1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-32-3240, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A330-200 series
airplanes and Model A330-300 series airplanes).
    (2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-4281, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Airbus Model A340-200 series
airplanes and Model A340-300 series airplanes).
    (3) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-5096, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A340-541 airplanes and
A340-642 airplanes).

(j) Repair or Replacement

    If, during the non-destructive test (magnetic particle
inspection) specified in paragraph (i) of this AD, the bogie pivot
pin is found corroded or the base metal is cracked: Before further
flight, repair or replace the bogie pin with a new or serviceable
bogie pin, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the
applicable service bulletin specified paragraph (j)(1), (j)(2), or
(j)(3) of this AD.
    (1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-32-3240, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A330-200 series
airplanes and Model A330-300 series airplanes.
    (2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-4281, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Airbus Model A340-200 series
airplanes and Model A340-300 series airplanes).
    (3) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-5096, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010 (for Model A340-541 airplanes and
A340-642 airplanes).

(k) Reporting Requirement

    Submit a report of the findings (both positive and negative) of
the inspections required by paragraphs (g) and (i) of this AD to
Airbus, Customer Services Directorate, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex France, ATTN: SDC32 Technical Data and
Documentation Services; fax (+33) 5 61 93 28 06; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>at the applicable time specified in
paragraph (k)(1) or (k)(2) of this AD. The report must include the
inspection results and description of any discrepancies found.
    (1) If the inspection was done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 90 days after the inspection.
    (2) If the inspection was done before the effective date of this
AD: Submit the report within 90 days after the effective date of
this AD.

(l) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs):
    The Manager, International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Vladimir Ulyanov,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington
98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office. The AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this
AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, nor shall a
person be subject to a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Number
for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public reporting for
this collection of information is estimated to be approximately 5
minutes per response, including the time for reviewing instructions,
completing and reviewing the collection of information. All
responses to this collection of information are mandatory. Comments
concerning the accuracy of this burden and suggestions for reducing
the burden should be directed to the FAA at: 800 Independence Ave.
SW., Washington, DC 20591, Attn: Information Collection Clearance
Officer, AES-200.

(m) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness
Directive 2011-0040, dated March 8, 2011, and the service
information specified in paragraphs (m)(1) through (m)(3) of this
AD, for related information.
    (1) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A330-32-3240, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010.
    (2) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-4281, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010.
    (3) Airbus Mandatory Service Bulletin A340-32-5096, including
Appendix 1, dated December 8, 2010.

    Issued in Renton, Washington on February 3, 2012.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2012-3105 Filed 2-9-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 200 (Thursday, October 16, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62169-62170]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24486]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0018; OMB No. 1660-0039]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; National Fire Academy Long-Term Evaluation
Form for Supervisors and National Fire Academy Long-Term Evaluation for
Students/Trainees

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will submit the
information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and
Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission will describe the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before November 17, 2014.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed to<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or

copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Records Management Division, 500 C Street SW., Room 7NE, Washington, DC
20472-3100, facsimile number<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Collection of Information

    Title: National Fire Academy Long-Term Evaluation Form for
Supervisors and National Fire Academy Long-Term Evaluation for
Students/Trainees.
    Type of information collection: Revision of a currently approved
information collection.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 078-0-2A, National Fire Academy
Long-Term Evaluation Student/Trainee; FEMA Form 078-0-2, National Fire
Academy Long-Term Evaluation Supervisors.
    Abstract: The National Fire Academy Long-Term Evaluation Forms will
be used to evaluate all National Fire Academy (NFA) on-campus resident
training courses. Course graduates and their supervisors will be asked
to evaluate the impact of the training on both individual job
performance and the performance of the fire and emergency response
department where the student works. The data provided by students and
supervisors is used to update existing NFA course materials and to
develop new courses that reflect the emerging issues/needs of the
Nation's fire service.
    Affected Public: State, local or Tribal government.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,000.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 405.
    Estimated Cost: There are no record keeping, capital, startup or
maintenance costs associated with this information collection.

    Dated: October 8, 2014.
Charlene D. Myrthil,
Director, Records Management Division, Mission Support Bureau, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2014-24486 Filed 10-15-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-45-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 10 (Thursday, January 15, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2009-2010]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30838]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30990 Amdt. No. 3619]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This rule establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective January 15, 2015. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of January 15, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or,
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit http://www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard A. Dunham III, Flight
Procedure Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs
Divisions, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition
to their complex nature and the need for a special format make
publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical.
Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on
charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFRs and
specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of the, associated
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also identifies the airport
and its location, the procedure, and the amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less than 30
days. For the remaining SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in
less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979); and
(3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this

amendment will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 21, 2014.
John Duncan,
Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Effective 8 January 2015

Santa Rosa, CA, Charles M. Schulz--Sonoma County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14,
Amdt 2A
South Lake Tahoe, CA, Lake Tahoe, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 7
St Petersburg-Clearwater, FL, St Pete-Clearwater Intl, VOR/DME RWY
36R, Amdt 2
Baton Rouge, LA, Baton Rouge Metropolitan, Ryan Field, ILS OR LOC
RWY 13, Amdt 27E
Baton Rouge, LA, Baton Rouge Metropolitan, Ryan Field, ILS OR LOC
RWY 22R, Amdt 11B
Baton Rouge, LA, Baton Rouge Metropolitan, Ryan Field, NDB RWY 31,
Amdt 2D
Baton Rouge, LA, Baton Rouge Metropolitan, Ryan Field, VOR RWY 4L,
Amdt 17C
Baton Rouge, LA, Baton Rouge Metropolitan, Ryan Field, VOR/DME RWY
22R, Amdt 8H
Elkton, MD, Claremont, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Bellaire, MI, Antrim County, VOR RWY 2, Amdt 2A, CANCELED
Columbus/W Point/Starkville, MS, Golden Triangle Rgnl, ILS OR LOC
RWY 36, Amdt 1
Siler City, NC, Siler City Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig
Siler City, NC, Siler City Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 1
Siler City, NC, Siler City Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 2
Siler City, NC, Siler City Muni, VOR-A, Amdt 3
New York, NY, West 30th St, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Toledo, OH, Toledo Express, ILS OR LOC RWY 25, Amdt 8
Clemson, SC, Oconee County Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Amdt 3
Wendover, UT, Wendover, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Amdt 1
La Crosse, WI, La Crosse Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 1B

[FR Doc. 2014-30838 Filed 1-14-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 104 (Thursday, May 30, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25092-25093]
[FR Doc No: 2019-11230]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85927; File Nos. SR-BOX-2018-24, SR-BOX-2018-37, and
SR-BOX-2019-04]

In the Matter of the BOX Exchange LLC Regarding an Order
Disapproving Proposed Rule Changes To Amend the Fee Schedule on the BOX
Market LLC Options Facility To Establish BOX Connectivity Fees for
Participants and Non-Participants Who Connect to the BOX Network; Order
Granting Petition for Review and Scheduling Filing of Statements

May 23, 2019.
    This matter comes before the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') on petition to review the disapproval, through
delegated authority, of the BOX Exchange LLC (f/k/a BOX Options
Exchange LLC) (``BOX'' or ``Exchange'') proposed rule changes (File
Nos. SR-BOX-2018-24, SR-BOX-2018-37, and SR-BOX-2019-04) to amend the
fee schedule on the BOX Market LLC (``BOX'') options facility to
establish certain connectivity fees and reclassify its high speed
vendor feed connection as a port fee.
    On July 19, 2018, the Exchange filed with the Commission, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change (SR-
BOX-2018-24) (``BOX 1'') to amend the BOX fee schedule to establish
certain connectivity fees and reclassify its high speed vendor feed
connection as a port fee. BOX 1 was immediately effective upon filing
with the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\3\ BOX
1 was published for comment in the Federal Register on August 2,
2018.\4\ On September 17, 2018, the Division of Trading and Markets
(``Division''), acting on behalf of the Commission by delegated
authority, issued an order temporarily suspending BOX 1 pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act \5\ and simultaneously instituting
proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \6\ to determine
whether to approve or disapprove BOX 1 (``Order Instituting Proceedings
I'').\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83728 (July 27,
2018), 83 FR 37853.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84168 (September 17,
2018), 83 FR 47947 (September 21, 2018).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 26, 2018, the Exchange filed a petition for review of
Order Instituting Proceedings I (``BOX 1 Petition'').\8\ On November
16, 2018, the Commission granted the BOX 1 Petition.\9\ On January 25,
2019, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\10\ the Commission
designated a longer period within which to approve or disapprove BOX
1.\11\ On February 25, 2019, the Commission issued an order affirming
the staff's action by delegated authority temporarily suspending the
rule filing and instituting proceedings.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Petition for Review of Order Temporarily Suspending BOX
Exchange LLC's Proposal to Amend the Fee Schedule on BOX Market LLC,
dated September 26, 2018.
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84614 (November 16,
2018), 83 FR 59432 (November 23, 2018).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84989, 84 FR 858
(January 31, 2019). The Commission designated March 29, 2019, as the
date by which the Commission would approve or disapprove BOX 1.
    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85184, 84 FR 6842
(February 28, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 30, 2018, the Exchange filed with the Commission a
second proposed rule change (SR-BOX-2018-37) (``BOX 2'') to amend the
BOX fee schedule to establish the same fees established by BOX 1.\13\
BOX 2 was immediately effective upon filing with the Commission
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\14\ On December 14, 2018,
the Division, acting on behalf of the Commission by delegated
authority, issued a notice of BOX 2 and order temporarily suspending
BOX 2 pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act \15\ and
simultaneously instituting proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the
Act \16\ to determine whether to approve or disapprove BOX 2.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ The proposed fees in BOX 2 were identical to those proposed
in BOX 1 and the Form 19b-4 for the two filings were substantively
identical, except BOX 2 also identified the categories of the
Exchange's costs to offer connectivity services and stated that the
proposed fees would ``offset'' the Exchange's costs. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 85459 (March 29, 2019), 84 FR 13363, 13364,
n.22 (April 4, 2019) (``Disapproval Order'').
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84823 (December 14,
2018), 83 FR 65381 (December 20, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 13, 2019, the Exchange filed with the Commission a
third proposed rule change (SR-BOX-2019-04) (``BOX 3'' and, together
with BOX 1 and BOX 2, ``proposed rule changes'') to amend the BOX fee
schedule to establish the same fees proposed by BOX 1 and BOX 2.\18\
BOX 3 was immediately effective upon filing with the Commission
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act.\19\ On February 26, 2019,
the Division, acting on behalf of the Commission by delegated
authority, issued a notice of BOX 3 and order temporarily suspending
BOX 3 pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act \20\ and
simultaneously instituting proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the
Act \21\ to determine whether to approve or disapprove BOX 3 (``Order
Instituting Proceedings III'').\22\ On March 5, 2019, the Exchange
filed a petition for review of Order Instituting Proceedings III (``BOX
3 Petition'').\23\ On March 22, 2019, the Commission granted the BOX 3
Petition and issued an order affirming the action by delegated
authority.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The proposed fees in BOX 3 were identical to those proposed
in BOX 2 and the Form 19b-4 for the two filings were substantively
identical. See Disapproval Order, supra note 13, at 13364, n.28.
    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \22\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85201, 84 FR 7146
(March 1, 2019).
    \23\ See Petition for Review of Order Temporarily Suspending BOX
Exchange LLC's Proposal to Amend the Fee Schedule on BOX Market LLC,
dated March 5, 2019.
    \24\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85399, 84 FR 11850
(March 28, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After consideration of the record in the proposed rule changes, the
Division, pursuant to delegated authority,\25\ issued an order
disapproving the proposed rule changes on March 29, 2019.\26\ On April
8, 2019, pursuant to Rule 430 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice,\27\ the Exchange filed a petition for review of the
Disapproval Order.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 17 CFR 200.300-3(a)(12).
    \26\ See Disapproval Order, supra note 13.
    \27\ 17 CFR 201.430.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Rule 431 of the Commission's Rules of Practice,\28\ the
Exchange's petition for review of the Disapproval Order is granted.
Further, the Commission hereby establishes that any party to the action
or other person may file a written statement in support of or in
opposition to the Disapproval Order on or before June 20, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 17 CFR 201.431.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the reasons stated above, it is hereby:
    Ordered that the Exchange's petition for review of the Division's
action to disapprove the proposed rule changes by delegated authority
is granted; and
    It is further ordered that any party or other person may file a
statement in support of or in opposition to the action made pursuant to
delegated authority on or before June 20, 2019.
    The order disapproving the proposed rule changes shall remain in
effect.

    By the Commission.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-11230 Filed 5-29-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 37 (Friday, February 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8131-8132]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03739]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Form 2-E under Rule 609; SEC File No. 270-222, OMB Control No.
3235-0233

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (``OMB'') a request for extension of the
previously approved collection of information discussed below.
    Rule 609 (17 CFR 230.609) under the Securities Act of 1933 (15
U.S.C. 77a et seq.) requires small business investment

companies and business development companies that have engaged in
offerings of securities that are exempt from registration pursuant to
Regulation E under the Securities Act of 1933 (17 CFR 230.601 to 610a)
to report semi-annually on Form 2-E (17 CFR 239.201) the progress of
the offering. The form solicits information such as the dates an
offering commenced and was completed (if completed), the number of
shares sold and still being offered, amounts received in the offering,
and expenses and underwriting discounts incurred in the offering. The
information provided on Form 2-E assists the staff in monitoring the
progress of the offering and in determining whether the offering has
stayed within the limits set for an offering exempt under Regulation E.
    There has not been a Form 2-E filing since calendar year 2010, when
there was one filing of Form 2-E by one respondent. The Commission has
previously estimated that the total annual burden associated with
information collection and Form 2-E preparation and submission is four
hours per filing. Although there have been no filings made under this
rule since 2010, we are requesting one annual response and an annual
burden of one hour for administrative purposes. Estimates of average
burden hours are made solely for the purposes of the Paperwork
Reduction Act and are not derived from a comprehensive or even
representative survey or study of the costs of Commission rules and
forms. The collection of information under rule 609 and Form 2-E is
mandatory. The information provided under rule 609 and Form 2-E will
not be kept confidential. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following website, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
[email protected]; and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to: [email protected]. Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: February 20, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-03739 Filed 2-22-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 229 (Wednesday, November 28, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71034-71035]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28590]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Notice of Application for Special Permits

AGENCY: Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PISA), DOT.

ACTION: List of applications for special permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations (49 CFR part 107,
Subpart B), notice is hereby given that the Office of Hazardous
Materials Safety has received the application described herein. Each
mode of transportation for which a particular special permit is
requested is indicated by a number in the ``Nature of Application''
portion of the table below as follows: 1--Motor vehicle, 2--Rail
freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft only, 5--Passenger-carrying
aircraft.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 28, 2012.
    Address Comments To: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Washington, DC 20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the applications are
available for inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30,
1200 New Jersey Avenue Southeast, Washington, DC or at http://regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with Part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 13, 2012.
Donald Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     Regulation(s)     Nature of special permits
    Application No.        Docket No.           Applicant              affected                 thereof
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                               NEW SPECIAL PERMITS
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15733-N...............  ................  Lockheed Martin        49 CFR 1075.105,      To authorize the
                                           Missiles and Fire      178.500, 173.60.      transportation in
                                           Control Dallas, TX.                          commerce of explosives
                                                                                in non-UN approved
                                                                                packaging. (modes 1, 2).
15735-N...............  ................  W.R. Grace Grace-Conn  49 CFR 173.242......  To authorize the
                                           Columbia, MD.                                transportation in
                                                                                commerce of a Class 4.3
                                                                                material in an IBC.
                                                                                (mode 1).
15741-N...............  ................  Pacific Consolidated   49 CFR                To authorize the
                                           Industries, LLC        173.302(f)(3), (4),   transportation of
                                           Riverside, CA.         (5); 175.501(e)(3).   oxidizing gases by cargo
                                                                                aircraft without a
                                                                                strong outer packaging
                                                                                capable of passing the
                                                                                Flame Penetration
                                                                                Restance Test, the
                                                                                Thermal Resistance Test,
                                                                                and to waive marking the
                                                                                outer package. (modes 4,
                                                                                5).
15743-N...............  ................  Midwest Cylinder,      49 CFR                To authorize the repair
                                           Inc. Cleves, OH.       180.211(c)(2)(i).     of certain DOT 4L
                                                                                cylinders without
                                                                                requiring pressure
                                                                                testing. (mode 1).
15744-N...............  ................  Praxair Distribution,  49 CFR 180.205;       To authorize the
                                           Inc. Danbury, CT.      180.209.              transportation in
                                                                                commerce of certain
                                                                                cylinders that have been
                                                                                ultrasonically retested
                                                                                for use in transporting
                                                                                Division 2.1, 2.2, and
                                                                                2.3 materials. (modes 1,
                                                                                2, 3, 4).
15745-N...............  ................  Praxair Distribution,  49 CFR 173.301(f)...  To authorize the
                                           Inc. Danbury, CT.                            transportation in
                                                                                commerce of certain
                                                                                foreign manufactured
                                                                                cylinders qualified
                                                                                under an alternative
                                                                                test method and which
                                                                                are not equipped with
                                                                                pressure relief devices.
                                                                                (modes 1, 3).

15746-N...............  ................  Siex Burgos, Spain...  49 CFR 173.302a;      To authorize the
                                                                  173.304a.             transportation in
                                                                                commerce of Division 2.2
                                                                                gases in cylinders
                                                                                manufactured according
                                                                                to the Eurpoean
                                                                                Directive for
                                                                                Transportable Pressure
                                                                                Vessels. (modes 1, 3).
15747-N...............  ................  UPS Atlanta, GA......  49 CFR 171.2(f);      To authorize the use of
                                                                  177.817(a);           electronic shipping
                                                                  177.817(c);           papers. (mode 1).
                                                                  177.817(e);
                                                                  177.802;
                                                                  172.203(a);
                                                                  172.602(c)(1);.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2012-28590 Filed 11-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909-60-M


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 135 (Tuesday, July 14, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 42384]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15157]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER20-2179-000]

Baldwin Wind Energy, LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Baldwin Wind Energy, LLC's application for market-based rate authority,
with an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes
a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is July 28, 2020.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: July 8, 2020.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-15157 Filed 7-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P