[Federal Register: April 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 79)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 21858-21859]
[DOCID:fr23ap08-23]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0068; Airspace Docket No. 08-AWP-1]

Proposed Establishment of Class E Airspace; Carson City, NV

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to establish Class E airspace at Carson
City, NV. The establishment of an Area Navigation (RNAV) Global
Positioning System (GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedure (SIAP)
at Carson City Airport, Carson City, NV, has made this proposal
necessary. The FAA is proposing this action to enhance the safety and
management of aircraft operations at Carson City Airport, Carson City,
NV.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 9, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2008-
0068; Airspace Docket No. 08-AWP-1, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eldon Taylor, Federal Aviation
Administration, System Support Group, Western Service Area, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA 2008-0068 and Airspace Docket No. 08-AWP-1) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management System (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed stamped
postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments to FAA
Docket No. FAA-2008-0068 and Airspace Docket No. 08-AWP-1''. The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified closing date
for comments will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the closing date
for comments. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://
www.faa.gov or the Federal Register's Web page at http://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Area, System Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, WA 98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) part 71 by establishing Class E airspace at Carson
City, NV. Controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate aircraft
using the new RNAV (GPS) SIAP at Carson City Airport. This action would
enhance the safety and management of aircraft operations at Carson City
Airport, Carson City, NV.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.9R, signed August 15, 2007, and effective September 15,
2007, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in this Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an

established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation: (1) is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106, describes
the authority for the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the
FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of the
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it establishes controlled airspace at Carson City Airport, Carson
City, NV.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the FAA Order
7400.9R, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 15,
2007, and effective September 15, 2007, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AWP NV, E5 Carson City, NV [New]

Carson City Airport, NV
    (Lat. 39[deg]11'32'' N., long. 119[deg]44'04'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Carson City Airport.
* * * * *

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on April 10, 2008.
Clark Desing,
Manager, System Support Group, Western Service Area.
[FR Doc. E8-8725 Filed 4-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 34 (Thursday, February 20, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9870-9872]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03322]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-88209; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2020-007]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Assume Operational
Responsibility for Certain Enforcement Functions Currently Performed by
FINRA Under the Exchanges Authority and Supervision

February 13, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 3, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to assume operational responsibility for
certain enforcement functions currently performed by the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority (``FINRA'') under the Exchange's
authority and supervision. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
assume operational responsibility for litigating contested disciplinary
proceedings arising out of Nasdaq Regulation-led investigation and
enforcement activities. In carrying out that responsibility, the
Exchange plans to engage a third party, such as a law firm or another
self-regulatory organization. Nasdaq Rule General 1, Section 7 \3\
requires Commission approval for this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Formally Nasdaq Rule 0150.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Section 6 of the Act requires that national securities exchanges
enforce their members' compliance with federal securities laws and
rules as well as the exchanges' own rules.\4\ As a self-regulatory
organization (``SRO''), Nasdaq must have a comprehensive regulatory
program that includes investigation and prosecution of violative
activity. Since it became a national securities exchange, Nasdaq has
contracted with FINRA through various regulatory services agreements
(``RSAs'') to perform certain of these regulatory functions on its
behalf. However, as the Commission has made clear, ``the Nasdaq
Exchange bears the responsibility for self-regulatory conduct and
primary liability for self-regulatory failures, not the SRO retained to
perform regulatory functions on the Exchange's behalf.'' \5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78(f).
    \5\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53128 (January 13,
2006), 71 FR 3550, 3556 (January 23, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In April 2019, Nasdaq received Commission approval to reallocate
operational responsibility from FINRA to Nasdaq Regulation \6\ for
certain investigation and enforcement activity,\7\ namely:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Under Nasdaq Rule 9120(t), Nasdaq Regulation includes the
Nasdaq Enforcement Department.
    \7\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85505 (April 3, 2019),
84 FR 14170, 14171 (April 9, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Investigation and enforcement responsibilities for conduct
occurring on The Nasdaq Options Market,\8\ and
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As appropriate, Nasdaq Regulation coordinates with other
SROs to the extent it is investigating activity occurring on non-
Nasdaq options markets to ensure no regulatory duplication occurs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     investigation and enforcement responsibilities for conduct
occurring on Nasdaq's equity market only, i.e., not also on non-Nasdaq-
affiliated equities markets.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ With respect to the operational responsibilities described,
Nasdaq Regulation already performed these functions for the Nasdaq
PHLX LLC (``Phlx''), Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE''), Nasdaq GEMX, LLC
(``GEMX''), and Nasdaq MRX, LLC (``MRX'') because there is no
comparable rule to Rule General 1, Section 7 on those markets.
Nasdaq BX, Inc. (``BX''), which does have a comparable rule to Rule
General 1, Section 7, received Commission approval to perform these
functions in June 2019. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
86051 (June 6, 2019), 84 FR 27387 (June 22, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Notwithstanding that approval, FINRA continues to perform certain
functions pursuant to a RSA,\10\ including, among other things, the
handling of contested disciplinary proceedings arising out of Nasdaq
Regulation-led investigation and enforcement activities.\11\ Nasdaq now
requests Commission approval to reallocate operational responsibility
from FINRA to Nasdaq Regulation for certain enforcement activity,
namely the handling of contested disciplinary proceedings through the
use a third party, not just FINRA.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ In addition to work performed pursuant to a RSA, FINRA also
performs work for matters covered by agreements to allocate
regulatory responsibility under Rule 17d-2 of the Act.
    \11\ For example, pursuant to Rule 9216, if at the conclusion of
a Nasdaq Regulation-led investigation, Nasdaq Regulation has reason
to believe that a violation occurred but the Respondent disputes the
violation and therefore does not execute an Acceptance, Waiver, and
Consent (``AWC'') letter, or if the Respondent executes the AWC
letter but the Nasdaq Review Council, Review Subcommittee or FINRA's
Office of Disciplinary Affairs does not accept the executed letter,
the Exchange may decide to pursue formal disciplinary proceedings.
In such a case, the Exchange would refer the matter to FINRA to
handle the formal disciplinary proceedings on its behalf. FINRA's
Office of Hearing Officers continues to be responsible for the
administration of the hearing process.
    \12\ A third party may include a law firm or another self-
regulatory organization. The Exchange will continue to use FINRA's
Office of Hearing Officers to administer the hearing process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its prior request for Commission approval to reallocate
operational responsibility from FINRA to Nasdaq Regulation for certain
investigation and enforcement functions, the Exchange noted that its
expertise in its own market structure coupled with its expertise in
surveillance activities will enable it to conduct investigation and
enforcement responsibilities for the Exchange effectively, efficiently
and with immediacy.\13\ The Exchange believes that assuming
responsibility for litigating contested disciplinary proceedings
through the use of more than one third party will similarly ensure that
matters are handled effectively, efficiently and with immediacy. As it
does with FINRA, the Exchange would directly oversee the work performed
by the third party. This will ensure that the Exchange continues to
bring to bear its overall market and surveillance expertise throughout
the disciplinary proceedings. Moreover, the Exchange will only use
third parties that

have the requisite legal experience, ensuring that only those third
parties with the appropriate qualifications handle contested matters on
the Exchange's behalf. Having the option to use a third party other
than FINRA will also ensure that contested cases are handled promptly
when, for example, FINRA's litigation resources are strained or when it
is otherwise unable to handle a particular matter.\14\ The Exchange
notes that this proposal would not change or alter in any way the
disciplinary processes around how contested matters are handled.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85153 (February 15,
2019), 84 FR 5748, 5752 (February 22, 2019).
    \14\ The Exchange intends to continue to use FINRA to handle
contested disciplinary proceedings. The Exchange is requesting
permission to have the option to use a third party other than FINRA
when it believes that doing so is consistent with ensuring prompt
resolution of regulatory matters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq Rule General 1, Section 7 requires that Nasdaq obtain
Commission approval if regulatory functions subject to RSAs in effect
at the time that Nasdaq began to operate as a national securities
exchange are no longer performed by FINRA or an affiliate thereof, or
by another independent self-regulatory organization. Nasdaq believes
that assuming operational responsibility for contested disciplinary
proceedings by using more than one third party to litigate such matters
will further its regulatory program and benefit investors and the
markets. Commission approval of the proposal would allow Nasdaq to
deliver increased efficiencies in the regulation of its market and to
act promptly and provide more effective regulation.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ BX, which has a comparable rule to Rule General 1, Section
7, will file a similar rule filing to request Commission approval to
use a third party to handle contested disciplinary proceedings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, Nasdaq notes that its proposal is consistent with work
performed by other national securities exchanges. For example, in 2015,
the SEC approved the New York Stock Exchange's (``NYSE'') application
whereby NYSE amended certain of its disciplinary rules to facilitate
the reintegration of certain market surveillance, investigation and
enforcement functions performed on behalf of NYSE by FINRA.\16\ That
reintegration also included the handling of contested disciplinary
proceedings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 75721 (August 18,
2015), 80 FR 51334 (August 24, 2015) and Order Granting Accelerated
Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 1,
3 and 5, Amending Exchange Disciplinary Rules to Facilitate the
Reintegration of Certain Regulatory Functions from Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc., Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 76436 (November 13, 2015), 80 FR 72460 (November 19, 2015) (SR-
NYSE-2015-35).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\17\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest. In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposal furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(7) of the Act,\19\ in particular, in
that these changes will continue to provide for fair procedures for the
disciplining of members and persons associated with members, the denial
of membership to any person seeking membership therein, the barring of
any person from becoming associated with a member thereof, and the
prohibition or limitation by the Exchange of any person with respect to
access to services offered by the Exchange or a member thereof.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that this proposal is in keeping with those
principles because it will ensure that contested matters are handled
effectively, efficiently and with immediacy. The ability to assume
responsibility for this function by using more than one party to handle
contested matters will ensure that contested cases are handled promptly
when, for example, FINRA's litigation resources are strained or when it
is otherwise unable to handle a particular matter. This will enable the
Exchange to take timely action when appropriate to enforce its rules,
hold bad actors accountable, and protect investors and market
integrity. This proposal, however, would not change or alter in any way
the disciplinary processes around how contested matters are handled.
Rather, it will result in more effective regulation because it will
facilitate timely and more efficient action. Internalizing the
litigation function through the use of a third party other than FINRA
will also enhance regulation because the Exchange will continue to
bring to bear its overall market and surveillance expertise throughout
the disciplinary proceedings. Moreover, the Exchange, consistent with
its statutory obligations, will only use third parties that have the
requisite legal experience, ensuring that only those third parties with
the appropriate qualifications handle contested matters on the
Exchange's behalf.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not
intended to address competitive issues but rather to enable the
Exchange to have the option to use a third party other than FINRA to
litigate contested matters on the Exchange's behalf.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve
or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-007 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-007. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use

only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-007 and should be submitted
on or before March 12, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-03322 Filed 2-19-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 152 (Wednesday, August 9, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 37206-37208]
[FR Doc No: 2017-16761]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP17-363-002.
    Applicants: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company submits tariff
filing per 154.203: Motion to Place Suspended Tariff Sheets into Effect
to be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5263.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-927-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP.
    Description: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (Petrohawk 41455 to Texla 48436) to
be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5101.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-928-000.
    Applicants: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Par.
    Description: Great Lakes Gas Transmission Limited Partnership Semi-
Annual Transporter's Use Report.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5125.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-929-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Overthrust Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Annual Fuel Gas Reimbursement Report for 2017 of
Dominion Energy Overthrust Pipeline, LLC.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5126.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-930-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing

per 154.204: Negotiated Rates--US Gas to MacQuarie eff 8-1-2017 to be
effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5133.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-931-000.
    Applicants: Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 154.403(d)(2): Fuel and L&U Update Filing to be effective 9/
1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5154.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-932-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rate--Con Ed to Constellation--794435 to be
effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5155.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-933-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.403: Rate Schedule S-2 Tracker Filing (EPC) eff
8/1/2017 to be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5164.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-934-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Neg Rate 2017-07-31 Encana to be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5168.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-935-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (AlaTenn), LLC.
    Description: American Midstream (AlaTenn), LLC submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Section 36 Tariff Update to be effective 9/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5186.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-936-000.
    Applicants: High Point Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: High Point Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: NAESB Standards Section 6.17 Tariff Update to be effective
9/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5191.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-937-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (Midla), LLC.
    Description: American Midstream (Midla), LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: NAESB Standards Section 27 and Negotiated Rate Agreement
Section 44 Update to be effective 9/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5198.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-938-000.
    Applicants: Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: DETI--July 31, 2017 Negotiated Rate Agreement to be
effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5200.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-939-000.
    Applicants: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners.
    Description: Dauphin Island Gathering Partners submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate Filing 8-1-2017 to be effective 8/
1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5219.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-940-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.203: Flow Through of Dominion Penalty Sharing
Rate Schedules GSS & LSS Report.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5237.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-941-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Northern Natural Gas Company submits tariff filing per
154.204: 20170731 Negotiated Rate to be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5239.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-942-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: GT&C Section 8--Liability to be effective 8/
31/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5268.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-943-000.
    Applicants: Total Peaking Services, L. L. C.
    Description: Total Peaking Services, L. L. C. submits tariff filing
per 154.204: TPS Housekeeping Changes to be effective 9/30/2017.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5291.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-944-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits tariff filing per 154.203: GSS
Storage Ratchet and Minimum Storage Balance Update.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5292.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-945-000.
    Applicants: Golden Pass Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Golden Pass Pipeline LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Capacity Reservation for Future Expansion to be effective 9/1/
2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5000.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-946-000.
    Applicants: MoGas Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report of MoGas Pipeline
LLC.
    Filed Date: 07/31/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170731-5320.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-947-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmts (RE Gas 35433, 34955 to BP 36473,
36475) to be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5072.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-948-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204:

Cap Rel Neg Rate Agmt (Gulfport 35446 to BP 36474) to be effective 8/1/
2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5073.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-949-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits tariff filing per 154.204:
Negotiated Capacity Release Agreements--8/1/2017 to be effective 8/1/
2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5096.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-950-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Index of Market Areas to be effective 9/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5107.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-951-000.
    Applicants: Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sabal Trail Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rate--FPL--Contract 850013 to be effective 9/1/
2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5110.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-952-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Atlantic Sunrise Project Initial Rate Filing
to be effective 9/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5111.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-953-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Garden State Expansion--Phase 1 Initial Rate
Filing to be effective 9/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5121.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-954-000.
    Applicants: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Enable Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing per
154.204: Negotiated Rate Filing--August 2017 XTO 1010983 to be
effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5133.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-955-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Volume No. 2--Statoil--Susquehanna West Project SP
322938 to be effective 11/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5180.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-956-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Susquehanna West Project--Recourse Rate to be
effective 9/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5196.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-957-000.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, L.
    Description: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, LLC submits
tariff filing per 154.204: 2017 Housekeeping Filing to be effective 9/
1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5215.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017,

    Docket Numbers: RP17-958-000.
    Applicants: Cameron Interstate Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Cameron Interstate Pipeline, LLC submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Implementation of Pro Forma Capacity Release Umbrella
Agreement to be effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5240.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-959-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP submits tariff filing
per 154.204: Negotiated Rates--Talen Release to NJR 8946884 to be
effective 8/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 08/01/2017.
    Accession Number: 20170801-5241.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 14, 2017.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 2, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-16761 Filed 8-8-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 229 (Thursday, November 30, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83566]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26289]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4745-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2023-0001]

Montana; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Montana (FEMA-4745-DR), dated October 11, 2023, and
related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on October 25, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Kenneth G.
Clark, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Alana B. Kuhn as Federal
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Deanne Criswell,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2023-26289 Filed 11-29-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 97 (Wednesday, May 20, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28990-28991]
[FR Doc No: 2015-12206]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP15-284-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing per 154.501: Environmental Report.
    Filed Date: 5/1/15.
    Accession Number: 20150501-5186.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/13/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-941-000.
    Applicants: Discovery Gas Transmission LLC.
    Description: Tariff Withdrawal per 154.205(a): Withdrawal of 2015
System Map Update.
    Filed Date: 5/6/15.
    Accession Number: 20150506-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-972-000.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, L.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: Negotiated Rate
Filing to Amend LER 5680's Attachment A 5-06-15 to be effective 5/6/
2015.
    Filed Date: 5/6/15.
    Accession Number: 20150506-5184.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: RP15-973-000.
    Applicants: Kern River Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) rate filing per 154.204: 2015 Mcf to Dth to
be effective 6/15/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/6/15.
    Accession Number: 20150506-5190.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/18/15.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For

other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call (202)
502-8659.

    Dated: May 7, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-12206 Filed 5-19-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 27, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 58)]
[Notices]
[Page 13506-13507]
[DOCID:fr27mr09-105]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Summary Notice No. PE-2009-13]

Petition for Exemption; Summary of Petition Received

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of petition for exemption received.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice contains a summary of a petition seeking relief
from specified requirements of a special condition. The purpose of this
notice is to improve the public's awareness of, and participation in,
this aspect of FAA's regulatory activities. Neither publication of this
notice nor the inclusion or omission of information in the summary is
intended to affect the legal status of the petition or its final
disposition.

DATES: Comments on this petition must identify the petition docket
number

involved and must be received on or before April 16, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2009-
0041 using any of the following methods:
     Government-Wide Rulemaking Web Site: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to the Docket Management Facility;
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590.
     Fax: Fax comments to the Docket Management Facility at
202-493-2251.
     Hand Delivery: Bring comments to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Privacy: We post all comments we receive, without change, to http:/
/www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can find and
read the comments received into any of our dockets, including the name
of the individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to
http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to the Docket Management
Facility in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Forseth, Transport Airplane
Directorate, ANM-113, Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This notice is published pursuant to 14 CFR 11.85.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 24, 2009.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.

Petition for Exemption

    Docket No.: FAA-2009-0041.
    Petitioner: International Lease Finance Corporation (ILFC).
    Description of Relief Sought: ILFC requests relief from the
requirements of Special Conditions No. 25-367-SC, for seat
installations on two Boeing Model 777 Series airplanes. Due to seat-
weight constraints, the seats contain composite handrails that may not
comply with the heat-release and smoke-emission testing requirements.

 [FR Doc. E9-6893 Filed 3-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 6 (Thursday, January 9, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1124-1125]
[FR Doc No: 2019-27690]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0186; FRL-9997-01-Region 4]

Tennessee; Approval of Plan for Control of Emissions From
Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration Units

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final
action to approve a state plan submitted by the State of Tennessee,
through the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (TDEC)
on May 12, 2017, and supplemented on February 9, 2018, for implementing
and enforcing the Emissions Guidelines (EG) applicable to existing
Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) units. The
State plan provides for implementation and enforcement of the EG, as
finalized by EPA on June 23, 2016, applicable to existing CISWI units
for which construction commenced on or before June 4, 2010, or for
which modification or reconstruction commenced after June 4, 2010, but
no later than August 7, 2013. The State plan establishes emission
limits, monitoring, operating, recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements for affected CISWI units. Since all the CISWI units in the
State are located at the Eastman Chemical Company in Kingsport,
Tennessee, the State has issued the facility an operating permit, the
terms of which are the relevant provisions of the EG, and has submitted
the permit as part of its State plan.

DATES: This rule will be effective February 10, 2020. The incorporation
by reference of documents listed in this rule is approved by the
Director of the Federal Register as of February 10, 2020.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R04-OAR-2018-0186. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy form at the
Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. EPA requests
that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Bloeth, Communities and Air
Toxics Section, Air Analysis and Support Branch, Air and Radiation
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Mr. Bloeth can be reached via
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> and via email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 129 of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) directs the
Administrator to develop regulations under that section and section
111(d) of the Act limiting emissions of nine air pollutants
(particulate matter, carbon monoxide, dioxins/furans, sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides, hydrogen chloride, lead, mercury, and cadmium) from
four categories of solid waste incineration units: municipal solid
waste incinerators; hospital, medical, and infectious solid waste
incinerators; commercial and industrial solid waste incinerators; and
other solid waste incinerators.
    On December 1, 2000, EPA promulgated new source performance
standards (NSPS) and EG to reduce air pollution from CISWI units, which
are codified at 40 CFR part 60, subparts CCCC and DDDD, respectively.
See 65 FR 75338. EPA revised the NSPS and EG for CISWI units on March
21, 2011. See 76 FR 15704. Following promulgation of the 2011 CISWI
rule, EPA received petitions requesting that EPA reconsider numerous
provisions in the rule. EPA granted reconsideration on certain issues
and, subsequently, on February 7, 2013, EPA promulgated a CISWI
reconsideration rule. See 78 FR 9112. Subsequently, EPA received
petitions to reconsider certain provisions of the NSPS and EG for CISWI
units. On January 21, 2015, EPA granted reconsideration on four
specific issues and subsequently, on June 23, 2016, EPA finalized
reconsideration of the CISWI NSPS and EG. See 81 FR 40956.
    Section 129(b)(2) of the CAA requires states to submit to EPA for
approval state plans and revisions that implement and enforce the EG--
in this case, 40 CFR part 60, subpart DDDD. State plans and revisions
must be at least as protective as the EG, and become federally
enforceable upon approval by EPA. The procedures for submittal and
adoption of state plans and revisions are codified in 40 CFR part 60,
subpart B.
    On May 12, 2017, Tennessee submitted a state plan to implement and
enforce the EG for existing CISWI units in the State, with a supplement
submitted on February 9, 2018.\1\ In a notice of proposed rulemaking
published on May 31, 2018 (83 FR 24960), EPA proposed to approve
Tennessee's State plan. Additional information concerning Tennessee's
State plan submission and the rationale for EPA's actions for this
final rule are explained in the May 31, 2018, proposed rulemaking.
Comments on the proposed rulemaking were due on or before July 2, 2018.
EPA received no comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The submitted State plan does not apply in Indian country
located in the State.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Final Action

    EPA is taking final action to approve Tennessee's State plan to
implement and enforce the EG for existing CISWI units in the State, as
submitted on May 12, 2017, and supplemented on February 9, 2018. EPA is
taking this action because it has concluded that Tennessee's State plan
is consistent with sections 111(d) and 129 of the CAA. As part of this
action, EPA is incorporating by reference Tennessee Operating Permit
number 072397, as issued on May 10, 2017. Permit number 072397 includes
emission limits, operating limits, monitoring requirements,
recordkeeping requirements, reporting requirements, and operator
training and qualification requirements applicable to affected CISWI
units. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov

and at the EPA Region 4 Office (please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of the preamble for more
information).

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a 111(d)/
129 plan submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and
applicable Federal regulations. In reviewing 111(d)/129 plan
submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided they meet
the criteria and objectives of the CAA and EPA's implementing
regulations. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as
meeting federal requirements and, although the plan is federally
enforceable, this action does not impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001).
    In addition, this rule is not subject to requirements of Section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be
inconsistent with the CAA. It also does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate
human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally
permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994). And it does not have Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because EPA is
not approving the submitted rule to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and because the submitted rule will not impose substantial
direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62

    Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control,
Aluminum, Fertilizers, Fluoride, Incorporation by Reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Manufacturing, Phosphate, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Waste treatment and
disposal.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7411.

    Dated: December 10, 2019.
Mary S. Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency amends 40 CFR part 62 as follows:

PART 62--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF STATE PLANS FOR DESIGNATED
FACILITIES AND POLLUTANTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 62 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart RR--[Amended]

0
2. In subpart RR, remove the undesignated center heading ``Air
Emissions From Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration
(CISWI) Units--Section 111(d)/129 Plan''.

0
3. Revise Sec.  62.10630 to read as follows:

Sec.  62.10630   Identification of sources.

    (a) Approval of State Plan for Commercial and Industrial Solid
Waste Incineration Units. Effective February 10, 2020, EPA approved
Tennessee's State Plan for Commercial and Solid Waste Incineration
Units, which is codified at Tennessee Operating Permit number 072397,
as issued on May 10, 2017. The plan applies to each existing commercial
and industrial solid waste incineration unit and air curtain
incineration unit in the State of Tennessee that commenced construction
on or before June 4, 2010, or commenced modification or construction
after June 4, 2010, but no later than August 7, 2013, as such
incineration units are defined in 40 CFR 60.2875 and 40 CFR part 60.
    (b) Incorporation by reference. (1) The material incorporated by
reference in this section was approved by the Director of the Federal
Register Office in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
Copies of the material may be inspected or obtained from the EPA Docket
Center--Public Reading Room, EPA West Building, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20004 or U.S. EPA, Region 4, Air
Analysis and Support Branch, 61 Forsyth Street, Atlanta, GA 30303. The
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Copies
may be inspected at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    (2) State of Tennessee, Air Pollution Control Board, Department of
Environment and Conservation.
    (i) Permit Number 072397, Issued to Eastman Chemical Company,
Tennessee Operation (MSOP-02), Date Issued May 10, 2017.
    (ii) [Reserved]

[FR Doc. 2019-27690 Filed 1-8-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 45037-45040]
[FR Doc No: 2018-18995]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0163; Product Identifier 2017-NM-168-AD; Amendment
39-19386; AD 2018-18-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
The Boeing Company Model 757 airplanes. This AD was prompted by an
evaluation by the design approval holder (DAH) indicating that the
longitudinal lap splices of the fuselage skin are subject to widespread
fatigue damage (WFD). This AD requires repetitive inspections of the
longitudinal lap splices of the fuselage skin for cracking and
protruding fasteners, and applicable corrective actions. We are issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 10, 2018.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of October 10,
2018.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.

It is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0163.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0163; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for Docket Operations (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David Truong, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Section, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, 3960 Paramount
Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: 562-627-
5210; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing Company
Model 757 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
March 2, 2018 (83 FR 8951). The NPRM was prompted by an evaluation by
the DAH indicating that the longitudinal lap splices of the fuselage
skin are subject to WFD. The NPRM proposed to require repetitive
inspections of the longitudinal lap splices of the fuselage skin for
cracking and protruding fasteners, and applicable corrective actions.
We are issuing this AD to address fatigue cracking of the longitudinal
lap splices of the fuselage skin, which could result in reduced
structural integrity of the airplane.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this final rule. The following presents the comments received on the
NPRM and the FAA's response to each comment. United Airlines concurs
with the actions in the NPRM.

Effect of Winglets on Accomplishment of the Proposed Actions

    Aviation Partners Boeing stated that accomplishing the supplemental
type certificate (STC) ST01518SE does not affect the actions specified
in the NPRM.
    We agree with the commenter. We have redesignated paragraph (c) of
the proposed AD as paragraph (c)(1) of this AD and added paragraph
(c)(2) to this AD to state that installation of STC ST01518SE does not
affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by this AD.
Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01518SE is installed, a
``change in product'' alternative method of compliance (AMOC) approval
request is not necessary to comply with the requirements of 14 CFR
39.17.

Request for Exception for Inspections of Existing FAA-Approved Repairs

    Delta Air Lines (Delta) asked that we add an exception to allow
existing FAA-approved repairs to be exempt from inspections. Delta
stated that the note in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104,
dated November 6, 2017, only specifies certain Boeing Commercial
Airplanes Organization Designation Authorization (ODA) approved repairs
are exempt from inspections. Delta stated that limiting approval of
this exception to the Boeing ODA only would mean that operators would
have to request an alternative method of compliance to apply this
inspection exception to any other FAA-approved repairs covering an
affected inspection area.
    We agree with the commenter's request to allow existing FAA-
approved repairs to be exempt from inspections, for the reasons
provided. We have added paragraph (h)(3) of this AD, under ``Exceptions
to Service Information Specifications,'' to include that exception.

Request To Include a Repair Method for Crack Findings

    Boeing asked that a statement be included in the proposed AD to
specifically require repair of crack findings during inspections using
a method approved in accordance with the procedures in paragraph (i) of
the proposed AD. Boeing noted that this statement is provided in AD
2016-15-04, Amendment 39-18595 (81 FR 49873, July 29, 2016), which
includes lap splice widespread fatigue damage inspection requirements.
Boeing added that this statement will make it clear and consistent with
the intent of the repair instructions specified in the referenced
service information.
    We acknowledge the commenter's request. However, the requirement to
repair cracks found during any inspections required by this AD is
implicit in the requirements of paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. Unlike the
previous AD referenced by Boeing, this AD uses high-level language and
requires accomplishment of the RC (required for compliance) steps in
the service information, which include the inspection and repair
actions. Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated November 6,
2017, specifies to contact Boeing for repair instructions, as well as
to contact Boeing for crack repair instructions or alternate inspection
instructions, depending on the condition found. Paragraph (h)(2) of
this AD requires operators to use a method approved in accordance with
the procedures in paragraph (i) of this AD when the service information
specifies to contact Boeing. Therefore, there is no need to include an
additional statement to specifically require repair of crack findings
during inspections using a method approved in accordance with the
procedures in paragraph (i) of this AD. For clarity, we have revised
the language in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD to match the language for
the conditions specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104,
dated November 6, 2017.

Request To Change or Omit Certain Inspections

    VT Mobile Aerospace Engineering (MAE), Inc., (VT MAE) and FedEx
Express (FedEx) asked that we omit or change certain lap splice
inspection areas. FedEx stated that its fleet of Model 757-200
airplanes was converted to a configuration similar to that of Model
757-200 special freighter airplanes, in accordance with the VT MAE
STCs. VT MAE stated that Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104,
dated November 6, 2017, identifies the FedEx Model 757-200 fleet as
Groups 1, 3, and 4 airplanes, and certain lap splice inspection areas
defined for those groups have been modified in accordance with the
STCs. VT MAE added that the proposed inspections do not apply to those
airplanes, or have reduced repetitive inspection intervals from those
specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated November
6, 2017.
    We acknowledge the commenter's requests. However, we do not
consider it appropriate to include various provisions in an AD
applicable only to individual airplane configurations or to a single
operator's unique use of an affected airplane. Under the provisions of
paragraph (i) of this AD, we will consider requests for approval of
AMOCs for the inspection areas and repetitive inspection intervals if
sufficient data are submitted to substantiate that the AMOC would
provide an acceptable level of safety.

We have not changed this AD in this regard.

Request To Include Repair Guidelines and Inspection Procedures

    Delta stated that while Boeing may not be able to include repair
instructions for fuselage skin cracking at the longitudinal lap joints
in all areas, repair guidelines should be included in Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated November 6, 2017, so that operators
can start damage containment and initial repair actions until specific
repair instructions are received from Boeing.
    We acknowledge the commenter's concern. However, the referenced
service information does refer to certain sections in the 757
Nondestructive Test (NDT) Manual to provide guidance for fuselage skin
cracking conditions. Although operators may refer to the NDT for
guidance, the repair must be done using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD, as specified
in paragraph (h)(2) of this AD. Also, waiting for Boeing to change the
service information to include additional repair guidelines would delay
the release of the AD, and the unsafe condition would not be addressed
in a timely manner. Therefore, we have not changed this AD in this
regard.
    Delta also asked that alternative inspection procedures for
protruding head fasteners be included in the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated
November 6, 2017, so that an AMOC request is not necessary.
    We do not agree with the commenter's request that Boeing revise the
service information to include alternative inspection procedures for
protruding head fasteners. Waiting for Boeing to change the service
information to include alternative inspection procedures would delay
the release of the AD, and the unsafe condition would not be addressed
in a timely manner. Therefore, we have not changed this AD in this
regard.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
this final rule with the changes described previously and minor
editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM for addressing the unsafe condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM.
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this final
rule.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated
November 6, 2017. The service information describes procedures for
visual and eddy current inspections of the longitudinal lap splices of
the fuselage skin for cracking and protruding head fasteners. This
service information is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 509 airplanes of U.S. registry. We
estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost        Parts cost      Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspections......................  367 work-hours x                 $0  $31,195 per          $15,878,255 per
                                    $85 per hour =                       inspection cycle.    inspection cycle.
                                    $31,195 per
                                    inspection cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have received no definitive data that will enable us to provide
cost estimates for the on-condition repairs specified in this AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to transport category airplanes and
associated appliances to the Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-18-07 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-19386; Docket No. FAA-
2018-0163; Product Identifier 2017-NM-168-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective October 10, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    (1) This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 757-200, -200PF,
-200CB, and -300 series airplanes, certificated in any category, as
identified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated
November 6, 2017.
    (2) Installation of Supplemental Type Certificate (STC)
ST01518SE (http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/
rgstc.nsf/0/312bc296830a925c86257c85006d1b1f/$FILE/ST01518SE.pdf)
does not affect the ability to accomplish the actions required by
this AD. Therefore, for airplanes on which STC ST01518SE is
installed, a ``change in product'' alternative method of compliance
(AMOC) approval request is not necessary to comply with the
requirements of 14 CFR 39.17.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by an evaluation by the design approval
holder indicating that the longitudinal lap splices of the fuselage
skin are subject to widespread fatigue damage. We are issuing this
AD to address fatigue cracking of the longitudinal lap splices of
the fuselage skin, which could result in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: At the
applicable times specified in paragraph 1.E., ``Compliance,'' of
Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated November 6, 2017,
do all applicable actions identified as ``RC'' (required for
compliance) in, and in accordance with, the Accomplishment
Instructions of Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated
November 6, 2017.

(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD, where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated
November 6, 2017, uses the phrase ``the original issue date of this
service bulletin,'' this AD requires using ``the effective date of
this AD.''
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated
November 6, 2017, specifies contacting Boeing for repair
instructions, or contacting Boeing for crack repair instructions or
alternate inspection instructions, and specifies that action as RC:
This AD requires doing the repair, or the alternate inspection and
applicable corrective actions, using a method approved in accordance
with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.
    (3) Inspections performed in accordance with Boeing Alert
Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated November 6, 2017, are not
necessary in areas where existing FAA-approved repairs cover the
affected inspection areas; provided the outermost repair doubler
extends a minimum of three rows of fasteners above and below the
original group of lap splice fasteners subject to the inspection.
Damage tolerance inspections specified for existing repairs must
continue. Inspections outside of the repaired boundaries are still
required as specified in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104,
dated November 6, 2017.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority
to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of
the person identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by the Boeing Commercial Airplanes Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Los
Angeles ACO Branch, to make those findings. To be approved, the
repair method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must
meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.
    (4) Except as required by paragraph (h)(2) of this AD: For
service information that contains steps that are labeled as RC, the
provisions of paragraphs (i)(4)(i) and (i)(4)(ii) of this AD apply.
    (i) The steps labeled as RC, including substeps under an RC step
and any figures identified in an RC step, must be done to comply
with the AD. If a step or substep is labeled ``RC Exempt,'' then the
RC requirement is removed from that step or substep. An AMOC is
required for any deviations to RC steps, including substeps and
identified figures.
    (ii) Steps not labeled as RC may be deviated from using accepted
methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the RC
steps, including substeps and identified figures, can still be done
as specified, and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact David Truong,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, Los Angeles ACO Branch, FAA,
3960 Paramount Boulevard, Lakewood, CA 90712-4137; phone: 562-627-
5224; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Service Bulletin 757-53A0104, dated November 6,
2017.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
206-231-3195.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on August 16, 2018.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-18995 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P