[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 68 (Monday, April 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18967-18968]
[FR Doc No: 2021-07392]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1612-000.
    Applicants: Georgia Power Company.
    Description: Initial rate filing: SR Cedar Springs Affected System
Construction Agreement (GPAS 015) Filing to be effective 2/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 4/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210402-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1613-000.
    Applicants: Alabama Power Company.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Cedar Springs Solar Affected
System Upgrade Agreement Filing to be effective 3/18/2021.
    Filed Date: 4/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210402-5152.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1614-000.
    Applicants: Georgia Power Company.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Cedar Springs Affected System
Upgrade Agreement Filing to be effective 3/18/2021.
    Filed Date: 4/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210402-5153.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1615-000.
    Applicants: Mississippi Power Company.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Cedar Springs Solar Affected
System Upgrade Agreement Filing to be effective 3/18/2021.
    Filed Date: 4/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210402-5155.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1616-000.
    Applicants: Daylight I, LLC.
    Description: Daylight I, LLC submits tariff filing per 35.1:
Facilities Use Agreements to be effective 6/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 4/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210402-5303.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1617-000.
    Applicants: Edwards Solar Line I, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Certificates of Concurrence
to Facilities Use Agreements to be effective 6/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 4/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210402-5203.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1618-000.
    Applicants: Sanborn Solar Line I, LLC.

    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Certificates of Concurrence
to Facilities Use Agreements to be effective 6/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 4/2/21.
    Accession Number: 20210402-5222.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/23/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1620-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Solar One LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Arizona Solar One, LLC MBR Tariff
Revision to be effective 4/6/2021.
    Filed Date: 4/5/21.
    Accession Number: 20210405-5583.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/26/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-1621-000.
    Applicants: Mojave Solar LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Mojave Solar MBR Tariff Revisions
to be effective 4/6/2021.
    Filed Date: 4/5/21.
    Accession Number: 20210405-5586.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/26/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following qualifying
facility filings:

    Docket Numbers: QF21-669-000.
    Applicants: Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC.
    Description: Form 556 of Georgia-Pacific Consumer Operations LLC.
    Filed Date: 4/5/21.
    Accession Number: 20210405-5428.
    Comments Due: None-Applicable.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: April 5, 2021.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-07392 Filed 4-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 8, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 25)]
[Notices]
[Page 6235-6237]
[DOCID:fr08fe10-96]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61456; File No. SR-BX-2010-011]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Add 75
Classes to the Penny Pilot Program

February 1, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 27, 2010, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (the ``Exchange'') proposes to designate 75
options classes to be added to the Penny Pilot Program, as referenced
in Chapter V, Section 33 of the Rules of the Boston Options Exchange
Group, LLC (``BOX''). The Exchange intends to notify BOX Options
Participants of the classes to be added to the Penny Pilot Program via
Regulatory Circular. The text of the proposed Regulatory Circular is
attached as Exhibit 2.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission notes that the text of the proposed
Regulatory Circular is attached at Exhibit 2 to the Form 19b-4, but
is not attached to this Notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization
has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C below, of the
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    On October 19, 2009 the Exchange submitted a proposed rule change
\4\ with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') to,
among other things, expand the number of classes included in the Penny
Pilot Program over four successive quarters, with 75 classes added in
each of November 2009,\5\ February 2010, May 2010, and August 2010.\6\
Options classes with high premiums will be excluded for the quarterly
additions.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 60886 (October
27, 2009), 74 FR 56897 (November 3, 2009) (SR-BX-2009-067). This
proposal was effective immediately upon filing.
    \5\ The Exchange filed a proposal similar to the present
proposal for the November 2, 2009 expansion of 75 classes. See
Securities and Exchange Act Release No. 60950 (November 6, 2009), 74
FR 58666 (November 6, 2009) [sic] (SR-BX-2009-069). This proposal
was effective immediately upon filing.
    \6\ The quarterly additions will be effective on November 2,
2009, February 1, 2010, May 3, 2010 and August 2, 2010,
respectively. For purposes of identifying the classes to be added
per quarter, the Exchange shall use data from the prior six calendar
months preceding the implementation month, except that the month
immediately preceding their addition to the Pilot would not be
utilized for purposes of the six month analysis. For example, the
quarterly additions to be added on February 1, 2010 shall be
determined using data from the six month period ending December 31,
2009.
    \7\ The threshold for designation as ``high priced'' at the time
of selection of new classes to be included in the Penny Pilot
Program is $200 per share or a calculated index value of 200. The
determination of whether a security is trading above $200 or above a
calculated index value of 200 shall be based on the price at the
close of trading on the Expiration Friday prior to being added to
the Penny Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on trading activity for the six months ending December 31,
2009, the Exchange proposes to add the following 75 classes to the
Penny Pilot Program on February 1, 2010:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Symbol                       Company name                 Symbol                Company name
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABT.................................  Abbott Laboratories.      LEAP...................  Leap Wireless
                                                                                International Inc.
AEM.................................  Agnico-Eagle Mines Ltd.   LLY....................  Eli Lilly & Co.
AET.................................  Aetna Inc.                LO.....................  Lorillard Inc.
AFL.................................  Aflac Inc.                LOW....................  Lowe's Cos Inc.
AKAM................................  Akamai Technologies Inc.  M......................  Macy's Inc.
AMAT................................  Applied Materials Inc.    MCO....................  Moody's Corp.
AMR.................................  AMR Corp.                 MET....................  MetLife Inc.
ANF.................................  Abercrombie & Fitch Co.   MMM....................  3M Co.
APC.................................  Anadarko Petroleum Corp.  MU.....................  Micron Technology Inc.
ATVI................................  Activision Blizzard Inc.  NUE....................  Nucor Corp.
BBD.................................  Banco Bradesco SA.        OXY....................  Occidental Petroleum
                                                                                Corp.
BCRX................................  BioCryst Pharmaceuticals  PARD...................  Poniard Pharmaceuticals
                                       Inc.                                               Inc.\8\
BK..................................  Bank of New York Mellon   PEP....................  PepsiCo Inc/NC.
                                       Corp/The.
BRCM................................  Broadcom Corp.            PM.....................  Philip Morris
                                                                                International Inc.
BTU.................................  Peabody Energy Corp.      PNC....................  PNC Financial Services
                                                                                Group Inc.
BX..................................  Blackstone Group LP.      QID....................  ProShares UltraShort
                                                                                QQQ.
CAL.................................  Continental Airlines      SHLD...................  Sears Holdings Corp.
                                       Inc.
CF..................................  CF Industries Holdings    SLM....................  SLM Corp.
                                       Inc.
CMCSA...............................  Comcast Corp.             SLW....................  Silver Wheaton Corp.
CSX.................................  CSX Corp.                 SQNM...................  Sequenom Inc.
CVS.................................  CVS Caremark Corp.        STEC...................  STEC Inc.
CX..................................  Cemex SAB de CV.          STX....................  Seagate Technology.
DD..................................  EI du Pont de Nemours &   SU.....................  Suncor Energy Inc.
                                       Co.
ERTS................................  Electronic Arts Inc.      TCK....................  Teck Resources Ltd.
EWJ.................................  iShares MSCI Japan Index  TEVA...................  Teva Pharmaceutical
                                       Fund.                                              Industries Ltd.
FDX.................................  FedEx Corp.               TLT....................  iShares Barclays 20+
                                                                                Year Treasury Bond
                                                                                Fund.
FNM.................................  Federal National          TZA....................  Direxion Daily Small
                                       Mortgage Association.                              Cap Bear 3X Shares.
FRE.................................  Federal Home Loan         UAUA...................  UAL Corp.
                                       Mortgage Corp.
GILD................................  Gilead Sciences Inc.      URE....................  ProShares Ultra Real
                                                                                Estate.
GLW.................................  Corning Inc.              UTX....................  United Technologies
                                                                                Corp.
HBC.................................  HSBC Holdings PLC.        WFR....................  MEMC Electronic
                                                                                Materials Inc.
HES.................................  Hess Corp.                WFT....................  Weatherford
                                                                                International Ltd.
HL..................................  Hecla Mining Co.          WLP....................  WellPoint Inc.
HOG.................................  Harley-Davidson Inc.      XLB....................  Materials Select Sector
                                                                                SPDR Fund.
HON.................................  Honeywell International   XRX....................  Xerox Corp.
                                       Inc.
JOYG................................  Joy Global Inc.           XTO....................  XTO Energy Inc.
JWN.................................  Nordstrom Inc.            YRCW...................  YRC Worldwide Inc.
KFT.................................  Kraft Foods Inc.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it is designed to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest,
by identifying the options classes added to the Penny Pilot Program in
a manner consistent with prior rule changes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Please note that PARD is presently not listed for trading on
BOX. If PARD is listed for trading on BOX at a later date it will be
subject to the applicable minimum trading increments as set forth in
Chapter V, Section 6(b) of the BOX Rules.
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received from Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(i) of the Exchange Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(1)
thereunder,\12\ because it constitutes a stated policy, practice, or
interpretation with respect to the meaning, administration, or
enforcement of an existing BOX rule.
    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate the rule change if it
appears to the Commission that the action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or would

otherwise further the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(i).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2010-011 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2010-011. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-BX-2010-011 and should be
submitted on or before March 1, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2585 Filed 2-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8020-8024]
[FR Doc No: 2023-02508]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-96783; File No. SR-GEMX-2023-01]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend ISO
Functionality

February 1, 2023.
    Pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 19, 2023, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX''

or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 11 with respect
to the ability of Members to submit ISOs in the Exchange's Facilitation
Mechanism (``Facilitation ISO''), and Solicited Order Mechanism
(``Solicitation ISO''), to codify current System functionality.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This functionality is currently offered on the Exchange, so
the proposed rule change codifies existing functionality in the
Exchange's rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/gemx/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Options 3, Section 11 with respect
to the ability of Members to submit ISOs in the Exchange's Facilitation
Mechanism (``Facilitation ISO''), and Solicited Order Mechanism
(``Solicitation ISO''), to codify current System functionality.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ This functionality is currently offered on the Exchange, so
the proposed rule change codifies existing functionality in the
Exchange's rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As set forth in Options 3, Section 11(b), the Facilitation
Mechanism is a process wherein the Electronic Access Member seeks to
facilitate a block-size order it represents as agent, and/or a
transaction wherein the Electronic Access Member solicited interest to
execute against a block-size order it represents as agent. Electronic
Access Members must be willing to execute the entire size of orders
entered into the Facilitation Mechanism. As set forth in Options 3,
Section 11(d), the Solicited Order Mechanism is a process by which an
Electronic Access Member can attempt to execute orders of 500 or more
contracts it represents as agent against contra orders it solicited.
Each order entered into the Solicited Order Mechanism shall be
designated as all-or-none.
    An ISO is defined in Options 3, Section 7(b)(5) as a limit order
that meets the requirements of Options 5, Section 1(h) and trades at
allowable prices on the Exchange without regard to the ABBO.
Simultaneously with the routing of the ISO to the Exchange, one or more
additional ISOs, as necessary, are routed to execute against the full
displayed size of any Protected Bid, in the case of a limit order to
sell, or any Protected Offer, in the case of a limit order to buy, for
the options series with a price that is superior to the limit price of
the ISO.\5\ A Member may submit an ISO to the Exchange only if it has
simultaneously routed one or more additional ISOs to execute against
the full displayed size of any Protected Bid, in the case of a limit
order to sell, or Protected Offer, in the case of a limit order to buy,
for an options series with a price that is superior to the limit price
of the ISO.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ ``Protected Bid'' or ``Protected Offer'' means a Bid or
Offer in an options series, respectively, that: (a) is disseminated
pursuant to the Options Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market
Plan; and (b) is the Best Bid or Best Offer, respectively, displayed
by an Eligible Exchange. See Options 5, Section 1(o).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed further below, none of the proposed rule changes will
amend current functionality. Rather, these changes are designed to
bring greater transparency around certain order types currently
available on the Exchange. The Exchange notes that the Facilitation ISO
and Solicitation ISO \6\ are functionally similar to the Exchange's
Price Improvement Mechanism \7\ ISO (``PIM ISO'') as set forth in
Supplementary Material .08 to Options 3, Section 13, as further
discussed below.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange notes that it has an ISO trade through
surveillance in place that will identify and capture when a Member
marks a Facilitation or Solicitation ISO and the order possibly
trades through a Protected Bid or Protected Offer price at an away
exchange. The Exchange will monitor the NBBO prior to and after the
order trades on the Exchange to detect potential trade through
violations.
    \7\ The Price Improvement Mechanism (``PIM'') is a process that
allows an Electronic Access Member to provide price improvement
opportunities for a transaction wherein the Electronic Access Member
seeks to facilitate an order it represents as agent, and/or a
transaction wherein the Electronic Access Member solicited interest
to execute against an order it represents as agent. See Options 3,
Section 13(a).
    \8\ The Exchange also notes that its affiliates, Nasdaq BX
(``BX'') and Nasdaq Phlx (``Phlx''), currently allow ISOs to be
entered into BX's Price Improvement Mechanism (``PRISM'') and Phlx's
Price Improvement XL (``PIXL''), respectively. See BX Options 3,
Section 13(ii)(K) (describing PRISM ISOs) and Phlx Options 3,
Section 13(b)(11) (describing PIXL ISOs). Other options exchanges
like Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe'') and Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.
(``EDGX'') similarly allow ISOs to be entered into their auction
mechanisms. See Cboe Rule 5.37(b)(4)(A) and EDGX Rule 21.19(b)(3)(A)
(allowing ISOs to be entered into Cboe's and EDGX's Automated
Improvement Mechanism (``AIM ISOs'')) and Cboe Rule 5.39(b)(4) and
EDGX Rule 21.21(b)(4) (allowing ISOs to be entered into Cboe's and
EDGX's Solicitation Auction Mechanism (``SAM ISOs'')). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 60551 (August 20, 2009), 74 FR
43196 (August 26, 2009) (SR-CBOE-2009-040) (Order Granting Approval
of a Proposed Rule Change to Adopt Rules Implementing the Options
Order Protection and Locked/Crossed Market Plan, including to adopt
AIM ISOs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Facilitation ISO
    Today, the Exchange allows the submission of ISOs into its
Facilitation Mechanism as Facilitation ISOs. To promote transparency,
the Exchange proposes to memorialize Facilitation ISOs as an order type
in Supplementary Material .06 to Options 3, Section 11. Specifically,
the Exchange proposes:

    A Facilitation ISO order (``Facilitation ISO'') is the
transmission of two orders for crossing pursuant to paragraph (b)
above without regard for better priced Protected Bids or Protected
Offers (as defined in Options 5, Section 1) because the Member
transmitting the Facilitation ISO to the Exchange has,
simultaneously with the transmission of the Facilitation ISO, routed
one or more ISOs, as necessary, to execute against the full
displayed size of any Protected Bid or Protected Offer that is
superior to the starting Facilitation auction price. Any
execution(s) resulting from such sweeps shall accrue to the Agency
order.

    Today, the Exchange will accept a Facilitation ISO provided the
order adheres to the current order entry requirements for the
Facilitation Mechanism as set forth in Options 3, Section 11(b)(1),\9\
but without regard to

the ABBO (similar to a regular ISO in Options 3, Section 7(b)(5)).
Therefore, Facilitation ISOs must be entered at a price that is equal
to or better than the Exchange best bid or offer on the same side of
the market as the agency order unless there is a Priority Customer
order on the same side Exchange best bid or offer, in which case the
Facilitation ISO must be entered at an improved price. The Exchange
does not check the Exchange best bid or offer on the opposite side of
the Facilitation ISO because the underlying Facilitation Mechanism
similarly does not check the opposite side Exchange best bid or offer.
As discussed above, the Facilitation Mechanism only requires that the
opposite side of the Facilitation order be equal to or better than the
ABBO.\10\ The Facilitation Mechanism does not check the opposite side
Exchange best bid or offer because any interest that is available on
the opposite side of the market would allocate against the Facilitation
agency order and provide price improvement. As an example of the
current underlying Facilitation Mechanism:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Specifically, Options 3, Section 11(b)(1) provides that
orders must be entered into the Facilitation Mechanism at a price
that is (A) equal to or better than the NBBO on the same side of the
market as the agency order unless there is a Priority Customer order
on the same side Exchange best bid or offer, in which case the order
must be entered at an improved price; and (B) equal to or better
than the ABBO on the opposite side. Orders that do not meet these
requirements are not eligible for the Facilitation Mechanism and
will be rejected. The Exchange notes that it is amending this
provision in a concurrent rule filing (SR-GEMX-2022-10), but that
the proposed changes in this filing do not impact SR-GEMX-2022-10
and vice versa. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 96363
(November 18, 2022), 87 FR 72556 (November 25, 2022) (SR-GEMX-2022-
10).
    \10\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Assume the following market:

Exchange BBO: 1 x 2 (also NBBO)
CBOE: 0.75. x 2.25 (next best exchange quote)
Facilitation order is entered to buy 50 contracts @2.05

    No Responses are received.
    The Facilitation order executes with resting 50 lot quote @2. In
this instance, the Facilitation order is able to begin crossed with the
contra side Exchange BBO because in execution, the resting 50 lot quote
@2 is able to provide price improvement to the facilitation order.
    Given that the Facilitation ISO is accepted so long as it adheres
to the order entry requirements of the underlying Facilitation
Mechanism, but without regard to the ABBO, the Exchange believes that
it is appropriate and logical to align the order entry checks of the
Facilitation ISO in the manner discussed above.
    The Exchange processes the Facilitation ISO in the same manner that
it processes any other Facilitation orders, except that it will
initiate a Facilitation auction without protecting prices away.
Instead, the Member entering the Facilitation ISO will bear the
responsibility to clear all better priced interest away simultaneously
with submitting the Facilitation ISO to the Exchange. The Exchange
believes that offering this order type is beneficial for Members as it
provides them with an efficient method to initiate a Facilitation
auction while preventing trade-throughs.
    The Exchange notes that the Facilitation ISO is similar to the PIM
ISO that is currently described in Supplementary Material .08 to
Options 3, Section 13.\11\ Similar to the Facilitation ISO, the PIM ISO
must meet the order entry requirements for PIM in Options 3, Section
13(b) but does not consider the ABBO.\12\ Further, the Exchange
processes a PIM ISO order the same way as any other PIM order except
the Exchange will initiate a PIM auction without protecting away
prices. As with Facilitation ISOs, the Member entering the PIM ISO
bears responsibility to clear all better priced interest away
simultaneously with submitting the PIM ISO to the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ Supplementary Material .08 to Options 3, Section 13 defines
PIM ISO as the transmission of two orders for crossing pursuant to
this Rule without regard for better priced Protected Bids or
Protected Offers (as defined in Options 5, Section 1) because the
Member transmitting the PIM ISO to the Exchange has, simultaneously
with the routing of the PIM ISO, routed one or more ISOs, as
necessary, to execute against the full displayed size of any
Protected Bid or Protected Offer that is superior to the starting
PIM auction price and has swept all interest in the Exchange's book
priced better than the proposed auction starting price. Any
execution(s) resulting from such sweeps shall accrue to the PIM
order.
    \12\ Unlike the Facilitation Mechanism, PIM requires an opposite
side NBBO check, which would include the Exchange best bid or offer.
As discussed above, the Facilitation order entry checks only require
that the opposite side of the Facilitation order be equal to or
better than the ABBO (i.e., there is no opposite side local book
check). For PIM, the order must be entered at one minimum price
improvement increment better than the NBBO on the opposite side of
the market if the Agency Order is for less than 50 option contracts
and if the difference between the NBBO is $0.01. If the Agency Order
is for 50 option contracts or more, or if the difference between the
NBBO is greater than $0.01, the PIM order must be entered at a price
that is equal to or better than the NBBO on the opposite side. See
Options 3, Section 13(b)(1) and (2). As such, PIM ISOs additionally
require the entering Member to sweep all interest in the Exchange's
book priced better than the proposed auction starting price (unlike
Facilitation ISO which does not have a similar sweep requirement).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following example illustrates how Facilitation ISO operates:
    Assume:

ABBO: 1 x 1.20
Exchange BBO: 0.90 x 1.30
Member enters Facilitation ISO with Agency side to buy 50 @1.25 and
simultaneously routes multiple ISOs to execute against the full
displayed size of any Protected Bids priced better than the starting
Facilitation auction price
Facilitation ISO auction period concludes with no responses arriving

    Facilitation ISO executes with contra side 50 @1.25 because the
away market Best Offer of 1.20 has been cleared by the ISOs clearing
the way for the Agency side to trade with the counter-side order at
1.25.
Solicitation ISO
    Today, the Exchange allows the submission of ISOs into its
Solicited Order Mechanism as Solicitation ISOs. To promote
transparency, the Exchange proposes to memorialize Solicitation ISOs as
an order type in Supplementary Material .07 to Options 3, Section 11.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes:

    A Solicitation ISO order (``Solicitation ISO'') is the
transmission of two orders for crossing pursuant to paragraph (d)
above without regard for better priced Protected Bids or Protected
Offers (as defined in Options 5, Section 1) because the Member
transmitting the Solicitation ISO to the Exchange has,
simultaneously with the transmission of the Solicitation ISO, routed
one or more ISOs, as necessary, to execute against the full
displayed size of any Protected Bid or Protected Offer that is
superior to the starting Solicitation auction price and has swept
all interest in the Exchange's book priced better than the proposed
auction starting price. Any execution(s) resulting from such sweeps
shall accrue to the Agency order.

    Today, the Exchange will accept a Solicitation ISO provided the
order adheres to the current order entry requirements for the Solicited
Order Mechanism as set forth in Options 3, Section 11(d)(1),\13\ but
without regard to the ABBO (similar to a regular ISO in Options 3,
Section 7(b)(5)). Therefore, Solicitation ISOs must be entered at a
price that is equal to or better than the Exchange best bid or offer on
both sides of the market; provided that, if there is a Priority
Customer order on the Exchange best bid or offer, the Solicitation ISO
must be entered at an improved price.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Specifically, Options 3, Section 11(d)(1) provides that
orders must be entered into the Solicited Order Mechanism at a price
that is equal to or better than the NBBO on both sides of the
market; provided that, if there is a Priority Customer order on the
Exchange best bid or offer, the order must be entered at an improved
price. Orders that do not meet these requirements are not eligible
for the Solicited Order Mechanism and will be rejected. Similar to
the Facilitation Mechanism, the Exchange is amending the entry
checks for the Solicited Order Mechanism in SR-GEMX-2022-10;
however, the proposed changes in this filing do not impact SR-GEMX-
2022-10 and vice versa. See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange processes the Solicitation ISO in the same manner that
it processes other orders entered in the Solicited Order Mechanism,
except

that it will initiate a Solicited Order auction without protecting away
prices. Instead, the Member entering the Solicitation ISO will bear the
responsibility to clear all better priced interest away simultaneously
with submitting the Solicitation ISO to the Exchange. Similar to the
Facilitation ISO discussed above, the Exchange believes that offering
this order type is beneficial for Members as it provides them with an
efficient method to initiate an auction in the Solicited Order
Mechanism while preventing trade-throughs. Furthermore, Solicitation
ISOs are similar to PIM ISOs in the manner described above for
Facilitation ISOs.\14\ In addition, other options exchanges currently
offer a substantially similar order type as the Exchange's Solicitation
ISO.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The Exchange notes that similar to the PIM ISO, but unlike
Facilitation ISO, the Solicitation ISO requires entering Members to
sweep all interest in the Exchange's book priced better than the
proposed auction starting price. The order entry checks for the
Solicited Order Mechanism, similar to PIM, requires an opposite side
NBBO check, which would include the Exchange best bid or offer. See
supra notes 11-12.
    \15\ As noted above, both Cboe and EDGX currently offer a SAM
ISO order type, which is defined as the submission of two orders for
crossing in a SAM Auction without regard for better-priced Protected
Quotes (as defined in Cboe Rule 5.65 and EDGX Rule 27.1) because the
Initiating TPH routed an ISO(s) simultaneously with the routing of
the SAM ISO to execute against the full displayed size of any
Protected Quote that is better than the stop price and has swept all
interest in the Book with a price better than the stop price. Any
execution(s) resulting from these sweeps accrue to the SAM Agency
Order. See Cboe Rule 5.39(b)(4) and EDGX Rule 21.21(b)(4). See also
Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 87192 (October 1, 2019), 84 FR
53525 (October 7, 2019) (SR-CBOE-2019-063) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change related to the SAM
Auction, including to adopt the SAM ISO); and 87060 (September 23,
2019), 84 FR 51211 (September 27, 2019) (SR-CboeEDGX-2019-047)
(Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change to Adopt a SAM Auction,
including to adopt the SAM ISO).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The following example illustrates how the Solicitation ISO
operates:
    Assume:

ABBO: 1 x 1.20
Exchange BBO: 0.90 x 1.30
Member enters Solicitation ISO with Agency side to buy 500 @1.25 and
simultaneously routes multiple ISOs to execute against the full
displayed size of any Protected Bids priced better than the starting
Solicitation auction price
Solicitation ISO auction period concludes with no responses arriving
Solicitation ISO executes with contra side 500 @1.25

    Note that in the case a Solicitation ISO was entered with the
Agency side to buy 500 @1.35, it would be rejected because it was not
at or better than the NBBO on both sides (which is inclusive of an
Exchange book check). While the 1.20 away Best Offer was cleared by the
simultaneously routed ISOs, the Exchange Best Offer of 1.30 would now
be viewed as the National Best Offer for purposes of the Solicitation
ISO.
    Further note that a Facilitation ISO entered with the Agency side
to buy 50 @1.35 can start in the same example above because it does not
have a contra-side (from the Agency order perspective) Exchange book
check to begin. The Facilitation ISO would go on to allocate against
the 1.30 offer on the Exchange book upon the conclusion of the auction.
Intermarket Sweep Orders
    In light of the changes proposed above to adopt the Facilitation
ISO and Solicitation ISO into its Rulebook, the Exchange proposes to
make related amendments to the ISO rule in Options 3, Section 7(b)(5)
to add that ``ISOs may be entered on the order book or into the
Facilitation Mechanism, Solicited Order Mechanism, or Price Improvement
Mechanism, pursuant to Supplementary Material .06 and .07 to Options 3,
Section 11, and Supplementary Material .08 to Options 3, Section 13.''
    The proposed rule text will be similar to BX's current ISO rule in
BX Options 3, Section 7(a)(6), except the Exchange's ISO rule will
refer to Exchange functionality that BX does not have today.
Specifically, BX does not currently offer Facilitation ISOs or
Solicitation ISOs. PIM ISOs are currently codified in Supplementary
Material .08 to Options 3, Section 13, so the proposed rule text herein
is a non-substantive amendment to add a cross-reference to the PIM ISO
rule. The proposed language does not amend the current ISO
functionality but rather is intended to add more granularity and more
closely align the ISO rule with BX's ISO rule.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ BX's ISO rule currently has more granularity than the
Exchange's ISO rule, such as requiring ISOs to have a TIF
designation of IOC and prohibiting ISOs from being submitted during
the opening process. The Exchange will add identical granularity to
its ISO rule in a separate rule filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\17\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\18\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Facilitation and Solicitation ISOs
    The Exchange believes that the proposal to adopt Facilitation ISOs
and Solicitation ISOs in Supplementary Material .06 and .07 to Options
3, Section 11 is consistent with the Act. The proposal will codify
current functionality, thereby promoting transparency in the Exchange's
rules and reducing any potential confusion. As it relates to
Solicitation ISOs, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
promotes fair competition. Specifically, the proposal allows the
Exchange to offer Members an order type that is already offered by
other options exchanges.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ See supra note 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, offering the Facilitation ISO and Solicitation ISO
benefits market participants and investors because this functionality
provides an additional and efficient method to initiate a Facilitation
or Solicited Order auction while preventing trade-throughs. As
discussed above, the Exchange processes the Facilitation and
Solicitation ISO in the same manner as it processes any other order
entered into the Facilitation and Solicited Order Mechanism, except the
Exchange will initiate a Facilitation auction or Solicited Order
auction without protecting away prices (similar to a regular ISO in
Options 3, Section 7(b)(5)). Instead, the entering Member, simultaneous
with the transmission of the Facilitation ISO or Solicitation ISO to
the Exchange, remains responsible for routing one or more ISOs, as
necessary, to execute against the full displayed size of any Protected
Bid or Protected Offer that is superior to the starting Facilitation or
Solicitation auction price, and for Solicitation ISO, has swept all
interest in the Exchange's book priced better than the proposed auction
starting price.\20\ As discussed above, these order types operate in a
similar manner to the PIM ISO that is currently described in
Supplementary Material .08 to Options 3, Section 13.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ See supra note 13.
    \21\ See supra notes 11 and 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Intermarket Sweep Orders
    The Exchange believes that the proposed changes to the definition
of ISOs in Options 3, Section 7(b)(5) are consistent with the Act. As
discussed above, the proposed changes are intended to add more
granularity and more closely align the level of detail in the ISO rule
with BX's ISO rule in BX Options 3, Section 7(a)(6) by specifying

how ISOs may be submitted.\22\ As such, the Exchange believes that its
proposal will promote transparency in the Exchange's rules and
consistency across the rules of the Nasdaq affiliated options
exchanges. While the proposed changes to the Exchange's ISO rule
generally track BX's ISO rule, the proposed language will refer to
certain Exchange functionality that BX does not have today (i.e.,
Facilitation ISOs or Solicitation ISOs).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \22\ See supra note 15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Offering Facilitation and
Solicitation ISOs does not impose an undue burden on competition
because it enables the Exchange to provide market participants with an
additional and efficient method to initiate a Facilitation or Solicited
Order auction while preventing trade-throughs, as discussed above. In
addition, all Members may submit a Facilitation ISO or Solicitation
ISO. As it relates to the Solicitation ISO, the Exchange believes that
the proposed rule change will promote fair competition among options
exchanges as it will allow the Exchange to compete with other markets
that already allow ISOs in their solicitation auction mechanisms.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See supra note 14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange further believes that the proposed changes to its ISO
rule do not impose an undue burden on competition. As discussed above,
the proposed changes are intended to add more granularity and more
closely align the level of detail in the ISO rule with BX's ISO rule in
BX Options 3, Section 7(a)(6) by specifying how ISOs may be submitted,
except the Exchange's ISO rule will refer to Exchange functionality
that BX does not have today (i.e., Facilitation and Solicitation
ISOs).\24\ With the proposed changes, the Exchange believes that its
proposal will promote transparency in the Exchange's rules and
consistency across the rules of the Nasdaq affiliated options
exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \24\ See supra note 15.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \25\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-GEMX-2023-01 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-GEMX-2023-01. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-GEMX-2023-01 and should be submitted on
or before February 28, 2023.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-02508 Filed 2-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 199 (Wednesday, October 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 61888-61891]
[FR Doc No: 2014-24478]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0002]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: New or modified Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations
(BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries
or zone designations, and/or regulatory floodways (hereinafter referred
to as flood hazard determinations) as shown on the indicated Letter of
Map Revision (LOMR) for each of the communities listed in the table
below are finalized. Each LOMR revises the Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRMs), and in some cases the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports,
currently in effect for the listed communities. The flood hazard
determinations modified by each LOMR will be used to calculate flood
insurance premium rates for new buildings and their contents.

DATES: The effective date for each LOMR is indicated in the table
below.

ADDRESSES: Each LOMR is available for inspection at both the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the table below and online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final flood hazard determinations as shown in the
LOMRs for each community listed in the table below. Notice of these
modified flood hazard determinations has been published in newspapers
of local circulation and ninety (90) days have elapsed since that
publication. The Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation has
resolved any appeals resulting from this notification.
    The modified flood hazard determinations are made pursuant to
section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65.
    For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is
shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals.
    The new or modified flood hazard information is the basis for the
floodplain management measures that the community is required either to
adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to remain
qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
    This new or modified flood hazard information, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities.
    This new or modified flood hazard determinations are used to meet
the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and also are used to
calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new
buildings, and for the contents in those buildings. The changes in
flood hazard determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the final flood hazard information available at the address
cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service
Center at www.msc.fema.gov.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                              Chief executive                                                                 Community
         State and county           Location and case No.  officer of community   Community map repository  Effective date of  modification      No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alabama:
    Jefferson (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of Clay (14-04-   The Honorable         City Hall, 2441 Old        August 14, 2014................       010446
     1421).                          2938P).                Charles Webster,      Springville Road,
                                                            Mayor, City of        Birmingham, AL 35125.
                                                            Clay, P.O. Box 345,
                                                            Clay, AL 35048.
    Jefferson (FEMA Docket No.: B-  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable David   Jefferson County Land      August 14, 2014................       010217
     1421).                          of Jefferson County    Carrington,           Development Department,
                                     (14-04-2938P).         Chairman, Jefferson   716 North 21st Street,
                                                            County Commission,    Room 202A, Birmingham,
                                                            716 Richard           AL 35263.
                                                            Arrington Jr.,
                                                            Boulevard North,
                                                            Birmingham, AL
                                                            35203.
Arizona:
    Maricopa (FEMA Docket No.: B-   City of Peoria (14-09- The Honorable Bob     City Hall, 8401 West       August 1, 2014.................       040050
     1421).                          0517P).                Barrett, Mayor,       Monroe Street, Peoria,
                                                            City of Peoria,       AZ 85345.
                                                            8401 West Monroe
                                                            Street, Peoria, AZ
                                                            85345.
    Pinal (FEMA Docket No.: B-      Unincorporated areas   The Honorable         Pinal County Engineering   August 8, 2014.................       040077
     1421).                          of Pinal County (14-   Anthony Smith,        Department, 31 North
                                     09-0882P).             Chairman, Pinal       Pinal Street, Building
                                                            County Board of       F, Florence, AZ 85232.
                                                            Supervisors, 41600
                                                            West Smith Enke
                                                            Road, Suite 128,
                                                            Maricopa, AZ 85138.
California:
    Riverside (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of Corona (13-09- The Honorable Karen   City Hall, 400 South       August 18, 2014................       060250
     1423).                          3138P).                Spiegel, Mayor,       Vincentia Avenue,
                                                            City of Corona, 400   Corona, CA 92882.
                                                            South Vincentia
                                                            Avenue, Corona, CA
                                                            92882.
    Riverside (FEMA Docket No.: B-  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Jeff    Riverside County Flood     August 18, 2014................       060245
     1423).                          of Riverside County    Stone, Chairman,      Control and Water
                                     (13-09-3138P).         Riverside County      Conservation District,
                                                            Board of              1995 Market Street,
                                                            Supervisors, 4080     Riverside, CA 95201.
                                                            Lemon Street, 5th
                                                            Floor, Riverside,
                                                            CA 95201.
    San Bernardino (FEMA Docket     City of Apple Valley   The Honorable Art     Engineering Department,    August 15, 2014................       060752
     No.: B-1423).                   (13-09-2728P).         Bishop, Mayor, City   14955 Dale Evans
                                                            of Apple Valley,      Parkway, Apple Valley,
                                                            14955 Dale Evans      CA 92307.
                                                            Parkway, Apple
                                                            Valley, CA 92307.
    San Bernardino (FEMA Docket     City of Hesperia (13-  The Honorable         City Hall, 9700 7th        August 15, 2014................       060733
     No.: B-1423).                   09-2728P).             Thurston Smith,       Avenue, Hesperia, CA
                                                            Mayor, City of        92345.
                                                            Hesperia, 9700 7th
                                                            Avenue, Hesperia,
                                                            CA 92345.
    San Bernardino (FEMA Docket     City of Victorville    The Honorable Jim     Engineering Division,      August 15, 2014................       065068
     No.: B-1423).                   (13-09-2728P).         Cox, Mayor, City of   Public Works Department,
                                                            Victorville, P.O.     14343 Civic Drive,
                                                            Box 5001,             Victorville, CA 92393.
                                                            Victorville, CA
                                                            92393.
    San Bernardino (FEMA Docket     Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Janice  San Bernardino County      August 15, 2014................       060270
     No.: B-1423).                   of San Bernardino      Rutherford, Chair,    Public Works Department,
                                     County (13-09-2728P).  San Bernardino        825 East 3rd Street, San
                                                            County Board of       Bernardino, CA 92415.
                                                            Supervisors, 385
                                                            North Arrowhead
                                                            Avenue, 5th Floor,
                                                            San Bernardino, CA
                                                            92415.
    San Diego (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of San Marcos     The Honorable Jim     City Hall, 1 Civic Center  August 21, 2014................       060296
     1423).                          (13-09-2932P).         Desmond, Mayor,       Drive, San Marcos, CA
                                                            City of San Marcos,   92069.
                                                            1 Civic Center
                                                            Drive, San Marcos,
                                                            CA 92069.
    San Diego (FEMA Docket No.: B-  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Dianne  San Diego County           August 21, 2014................       060284
     1423).                          of San Diego County    Jacob, Chair, San     Department of Public
                                     (13-09-2932P).         Diego County Board    Works, 5510 Overland
                                                            of Supervisors,       Avenue, Suite 410, San
                                                            1600 Pacific          Diego, CA 92123.
                                                            Highway, Suite 335,
                                                            San Diego, CA 92101.
Colorado:
    Boulder (FEMA Docket No.: B-    City of Longmont (13-  The Honorable Dennis  Public Works Department,   August 21, 2014................       080027
     1423).                          08-1185P).             L. Coombs, Mayor,     1100 South Sherman
                                                            City of Longmont,     Street, Longmont, CO
                                                            350 Kimbark Street,   80501.
                                                            Longmont, CO 80501.
    Boulder (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Cindy   Boulder County             August 21, 2014................       080023
     1423).                          of Boulder County      Domenico, Chair,      Transportation
                                     (13-08-1185P).         Boulder County        Department, 2525 13th
                                                            Board of              Street, Suite 203,
                                                            Commissioners, P.O.   Boulder, CO 80306.
                                                            Box 471, Boulder,
                                                            CO 80306.
    Delta (FEMA Docket No.: B-      City of Delta (14-08-  The Honorable Ed      City Hall, 360 Main        August 7, 2014.................       080043
     1421).                          0144P).                Sisson, Mayor, City   Street, Delta, CO 81416.
                                                            of Delta, 360 Main
                                                            Street, Delta, CO
                                                            81416.
Florida:
    Collier (FEMA Docket No.: B-    City of Naples (14-04- The Honorable John    Building Department, 295   August 11, 2014................       125130
     1423).                          0880P).                Sorey, III, Mayor,    Riverside Circle,
                                                            City of Naples, 735   Naples, FL 34102.
                                                            8th Street South,
                                                            Naples, FL 34102.
    Lee (FEMA Docket No.: B-1421).  Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Larry   Lee County Community       August 1, 2014.................       125124
                                     of Lee County (14-04-  Kiker, Chairman,      Development Department,
                                     3452X).                Lee County Board of   1500 Monroe Street, 2nd
                                                            Commissioners, 2115   Floor, Fort Myers, FL
                                                            2nd Street, Fort      33901.
                                                            Myers, FL 33901.

    Monroe (FEMA Docket No.: B-     Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Sylvia  Monroe County Department   August 11, 2014................       125129
     1423).                          of Monroe County (14-  Murphy, Mayor,        of Planning and
                                     04-1710P).             Monroe County, 1100   Environmental Resources,
                                                            Simonton Street,      2798 Overseas Highway,
                                                            Key West, FL 33040.   Marathon, FL 33050.
    Monroe (FEMA Docket No.: B-     Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Sylvia  Monroe County Department   August 11, 2014................       125129
     1423).                          of Monroe County (14-  Murphy, Mayor,        of Planning and
                                     04-2295P).             Monroe County, 1100   Environmental Resources,
                                                            Simonton Street,      2798 Overseas Highway,
                                                            Key West, FL 33040.   Marathon, FL 33050.
    Monroe (FEMA Docket No.: B-     Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Sylvia  Monroe County Department   August 15, 2014................       125129
     1423).                          of Monroe County (14-  Murphy, Mayor,        of Planning and
                                     04-3390P).             Monroe County, 1100   Environmental Resources,
                                                            Simonton Street,      2798 Overseas Highway,
                                                            Key West, FL 33040.   Marathon, FL 33050.
    Orange (FEMA Docket No.: B-     City of Orlando (13-   The Honorable Buddy   Permitting Services        August 8, 2014.................       120186
     1421).                          04-4686P).             Dyer, Mayor, City     Division, 400 South
                                                            of Orlando, P.O.      Orange Avenue, Orlando,
                                                            Box 4990, Orlando,    FL 32801.
                                                            FL 32802.
    Orange (FEMA Docket No.: B-     City of Winter Park    The Honorable         Building Department, 401   August 8, 2014.................       120188
     1421).                          (13-04-4686P).         Kenneth W. Bradley,   South Park Avenue,
                                                            Mayor, City of        Winter Park, FL 32789.
                                                            Winter Park, 401
                                                            South Park Avenue,
                                                            Winter Park, FL
                                                            32789.
    Orange (FEMA Docket No.: B-     Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Teresa  Orange County Stormwater   August 8, 2014.................       120179
     1421).                          of Orange County (13-  Jacobs, Mayor,        Management Department,
                                     04-4686P).             Orange County, 201    4200 South John Young
                                                            South Rosalind        Parkway, Orlando, FL
                                                            Avenue, 5th Floor,    32839.
                                                            Orlando, FL 32801.
    Seminole (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Bob     Seminole County Public     August 15, 2014................       120289
     1423).                          of Seminole County     Dallari, Chairman,    Works Department, 1101
                                     (14-04-2923P).         Seminole County       East 1st Street,
                                                            Board of              Sanford, FL 32771.
                                                            Commissioners, 1101
                                                            East 1st Street,
                                                            Sanford, FL 32771.
    Sumter (FEMA Docket No.: B-     City of Wildwood (14-  The Honorable Ed      Development Services       August 8, 2014.................       120299
     1423).                          04-2261P).             Wolf, Mayor, City     Department, 100 North
                                                            of Wildwood, 100      Main Street, Wildwood,
                                                            North Main Street,    FL 34785.
                                                            Wildwood, FL 34785.
    Sumter (FEMA Docket No.: B-     Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Al      Sumter County Development  August 8, 2014.................       120296
     1423).                          of Sumter County (14-  Butler, Chairman,     Department, 7375 Powell
                                     04-2261P).             Sumter County Board   Road, Wildwood, FL 34785.
                                                            of Commissioners,
                                                            7375 Powell Road,
                                                            Wildwood, FL 34785.
    Sumter (FEMA Docket No.: B-     Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Al      Sumter County Development  August 1, 2014.................       120296
     1421).                          of Sumter County (14-  Butler, Chairman,     Department, 7375 Powell
                                     04-3677P).             Sumter County Board   Road, Wildwood, FL 34785.
                                                            of Commissioners,
                                                            7375 Powell Road,
                                                            Wildwood, FL 34785.
Kentucky:
    Fayette (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Lexington-Fayette      The Honorable Jim     Lexington-Fayette Urban    August 18, 2014................       210067
     1423).                          Urban County           Gray, Mayor,          County Government
                                     Government (13-04-     Lexington-Fayette     Division of Planning,
                                     3690P).                Urban County          101 East Vine Street,
                                                            Government, 200       Lexington, KY 40507.
                                                            East Main Street,
                                                            Lexington, KY 40507.
Nevada:
    Clark (FEMA Docket No.: B-      Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Steve   Clark County Public Works  August 1, 2014.................       320003
     1421).                          of Clark County (13-   Sisolak, Chairman,    Department, 500 Grand
                                     09-3209P).             Clark County Board    Central Parkway, Las
                                                            of Commissioners,     Vegas, NV 89155.
                                                            500 South Grand
                                                            Central Parkway,
                                                            Las Vegas, NV 89155.
    Douglas (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Doug    Douglas County Planning    August 1, 2014.................       320008
     1421).                          of Douglas County      Johnson, Chairman,    Division, 1594 Ismeralda
                                     (13-09-3099P).         Douglas County        Avenue, Minden, NV 89423.
                                                            Board of
                                                            Commissioners, P.O.
                                                            Box 218, Minden, NV
                                                            89423.
New York:
    Dutchess (FEMA Docket No.: B-   Town of LaGrange (14-  The Honorable Alan    Town Hall, 120 Stringham   August 11, 2014................       361011
     1411).                          02[dash]0734P).        Bell, Supervisor,     Road, LaGrangeville, NY
                                                            LaGrange Town         12540.
                                                            Board, 120
                                                            Stringham Road,
                                                            LaGrangeville, NY
                                                            12540.
North Carolina:
    Cumberland (FEMA Docket No.: B- City of Fayetteville   The Honorable Nat     Planning Department, 433   August 5, 2014.................       370077
     1421).                          (14-04-1195P).         Robertson, Mayor,     Hay Street,
                                                            City of               Fayetteville, NC 28301.
                                                            Fayetteville, 433
                                                            Hay Street,
                                                            Fayetteville, NC
                                                            28301.
    Mecklenburg (FEMA Docket No.:   Town of Davidson (12-  The Honorable John    Planning Department, 216   August 15, 2014................       370503
     B-1423).                        04-5664P).             Woods, Mayor, Town    South Main Street,
                                                            of Davidson, P.O.     Davidson, NC 28036.
                                                            Box 1929, Davidson,
                                                            NC 28036.
    Mecklenburg (FEMA Docket No.:   Unincorporated areas   Ms. Dena Diorio,      Mecklenburg County         August 15, 2014................       370158
     B-1423).                        of Mecklenburg         Mecklenburg County    Planning Department, 600
                                     County (12-04-5664P).  Manager, 600 East     East 4th Street,
                                                            4th Street,           Charlotte, NC 28202.
                                                            Charlotte, NC 28202.

    Wake (FEMA Docket No.: B-1421)  City of Raleigh (13-   The Honorable Nancy   Public Works Department,   August 18, 2014................       370243
                                     04-5462P).             McFarlane, Mayor,     222 West Hargett Street,
                                                            City of Raleigh,      Raleigh, NC 27601.
                                                            P.O. Box 590,
                                                            Raleigh, NC 27602.
South Carolina:
    Greenville (FEMA Docket No.: B- Unincorporated areas   The Honorable Bob     Greenville County Code     August 15, 2014................       450089
     1423).                          of Greenville County   Taylor, Chairman,     Department, 301
                                     (13-04-8105P).         Greenville County     University Ridge, Suite
                                                            Council, 301          4100, Greenville, SC
                                                            University Ridge,     29601.
                                                            Suite 2400,
                                                            Greenville, SC
                                                            29601.
South Dakota:
    Pennington (FEMA Docket No.: B- City of Rapid City     The Honorable Sam     Planning Department, 300   August 21, 2014................       465420
     1423).                          (13-08-1321P).         Kooiker, Mayor,       6th Street, Rapid City,
                                                            City of Rapid City,   SD 57701.
                                                            300 6th Street,
                                                            Rapid City, SD
                                                            57701.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: September 29, 2014.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-24478 Filed 10-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P