[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45133-45134]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19143]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID: FEMA-2018-0012; OMB No. 1660--NEW]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; National Catastrophic Resource Catalog

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) will submit the
information collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and
Budget for review and clearance in accordance with the requirements of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The submission will describe the
nature of the information collection, the categories of respondents,
the estimated burden (i.e., the time, effort and resources used by
respondents to respond) and cost, and the actual data collection
instruments FEMA will use.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before October 5, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit written comments on the proposed information
collection to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office
of Management and Budget. Comments should be addressed to the Desk
Officer for the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, and sent via electronic mail to
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection should be made to Director,
Information Management Division, 500 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,
email address [email protected] or
Thomas Murray, Fire Program Specialist, FEMA, U.S. Fire Administration,
(301) 447-1588, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed information collection
previously published in the Federal Register on March 29, 2018 at 83 FR
13496 with a 60 day public comment period. FEMA received 4 anonymous
public comments that were not relevant to the information collection.
Additionally, FEMA noticed that the previously-published proposed
collection incorrectly contained the

term ``ESF-4'' in the Abstract section; accordingly, the term ``ESF-4''
has been removed from the Abstract section. The purpose of this notice
is to notify the public that FEMA will submit the information
collection abstracted below to the Office of Management and Budget for
review and clearance.

Collection of Information

    Title: National Catastrophic Resource Catalog.
    Type of Information Collection: New information collection.
    OMB Number: 1660-NEW.
    Form Titles and Numbers: FEMA Form 035-0-1, National Catastrophic
Resource Catalog.
    Abstract: This information collection will help USFA meet the
firefighting resource requirements before/during a national
catastrophic disaster response, such as an earthquake, hurricane, or
terroristic act. USFA will pre-identify those specialized resources
that may be available to support a disaster response. This collection
will be solicited from the nation's fire and emergency services on a
voluntary basis to establish a catalog/database of potential resources
that could be mobilized to support a national catastrophic disaster
response.
    Affected Public: Not-for-profit institutions; State, Local or
Tribal Governments.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 3,947.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 3,947.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 439.
    Estimated Total Annual Respondent Cost: $23,728.94.
    Estimated Respondents' Operation and Maintenance Costs: $0.
    Estimated Respondents' Capital and Start-Up Costs: $0.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost to the Federal Government: $85,824.49.

Comments

    Comments may be submitted as indicated in the ADDRESSES caption
above. Comments are solicited to (a) evaluate whether the proposed data
collection is necessary for the proper performance of the agency,
including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b)
evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c) enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) minimize the burden
of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.

Rachel Frier,
Records Management Branch Chief, Office of the Chief Administrative
Officer, Mission Support, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2018-19143 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-45-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 192 (Wednesday, October 3, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 60421]
[FR Doc No: 2012-24350]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ Project No. 13477-001]

 FFP Project 67 LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted For Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

    On September 4, 2012, FFP Project 67, LLC filed an application for
a preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act
(FPA), proposing to study the feasibility of a hydropower project
located on the Mississippi River, near Saint Joseph, in Tensas Parish,
Louisiana and Claiborne County, Mississippi. The sole purpose of a
preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant the permit holder priority
to file a license application during the permit term. A preliminary
permit does not authorize the permit holder to perform any land-
disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands or waters owned by
others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Bondurant Chute hydrokinetic project would consist of
the following: (1) Up to 2,300 SmarTurbine generating units installed
in arrays on the bottom of the river; (2) the total capacity of the
installation would be up to 92,000 kilowatts; (3) flexible cables would
convey each arrays power to a metering station; and (4) a transmission
line would interconnect with the power grid. The proposed project would
have an average annual generation of 209,229,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh),
which would be sold to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Ramya Swaminathan, Free Flow Power Corporation,
239 Causeway Street, Boston, MA 02114; phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Michael Spencer,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Competing applications and notices of intent must meet the requirements
of 18 CFR 4.36. Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and
competing applications may be filed electronically via the Internet.
See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's
Web site http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can
submit brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior
registration, using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information
at the end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676,
or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Although the Commission strongly encourages
electronic filing, documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file,
mail an original and seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426.
    More information about this project, including a copy of the
application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13477) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

    Dated: September 27, 2012.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
 Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-24350 Filed 10-2-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: March 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 47)]
[Notices]
[Page 12786-12788]
[DOCID:fr10mr08-109]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-57421; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-24]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1 Thereto, Amending Its Schedule of Fees and Charges
Applicable to the Option Strategy Executions Pilot Program

March 3, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 26, 2008, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule

change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have
been substantially prepared by the Exchange. On February 29, 2008, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposal.\3\ NYSE Arca has
designated this proposal as one establishing or changing a due, fee, or
other charge imposed by the Exchange under Section 19(b)(3)(A),\4\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\5\ which renders the proposal effective
upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1 made clarifying changes to the original
filing.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NYSE Arca proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees and Charges in
order to extend the pilot program that applies to Option Strategy
Executions (``Pilot Program'') until March 1, 2009. The text of the
proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the Commission's
Public Reference Room, and http://www.nysearca.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NYSE Arca included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposal. The text of these
statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below.
NYSE Arca has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A, B, and C
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to extend the Pilot
Program that applies to Option Strategy Executions until March 1,
2009.\6\ The transactions included as part of the Pilot Program include
reversals and conversions,\7\ dividend spreads,\8\ box spreads,\9\
short stock interest spreads,\10\ and merger spreads.\11\ Because the
referenced Options Strategy Transactions are generally executed by
professionals whose profit margins are generally narrow, the Pilot
Program caps the transaction fees associated with such executions at
$750 per strategy execution that are executed on the same trading day
in the same option class. In addition, there is also a monthly cap of
$25,000 per initiating firm for all strategy executions. The Exchange
believes that by keeping fees low, the Exchange is able to attract
liquidity by accommodating these transactions. Extending the Pilot
Program until March 1, 2009 will allow the Exchange to keep these fees
low and thus continue to attract liquidity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The current rule text is substantially similar to the
original filing approved in 2007. See Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 55414 (March 7, 2007), 72 FR 11418 (March 13, 2007) (SR-
NYSEArca-2007-25).
    \7\ Reversals and conversions are transactions that employ
calls, puts and the underlying stock to lock in a nearly risk free
profit. Reversals are established by combining a short stock
position with a short put and a long call position that shares the
same strike and expiration. Conversions employ long positions in the
underlying stock that accompany long puts and short calls sharing
the same strike and expiration.
    \8\ Dividend spreads are trades involving deep in the money
options that exploit pricing differences arising around the time a
stock goes ex-dividend.
    \9\ A Box spread is a strategy that synthesizes long and short
stock positions to create a profit. Specifically, a long call and
short put at one strike is combined with a short call and long put
at a different strike to create synthetic long and synthetic short
stock positions, respectively.
    \10\ A short stock interest spread is a spread that uses two
deep in the money put options of the same class followed by the
exercise of the resulting long position in order to establish a
short stock interest arbitrage position.
    \11\ A merger spread is a transaction executed pursuant to a
strategy involving the simultaneous purchase and sale of options of
the same class and expiration date, but with different strike prices
followed by the exercise of the resulting long option position.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OTP Holders and OTP Firms who wish to benefit from the fee cap will
be required to submit to the Exchange forms with supporting
documentation (e.g., clearing firm transaction data) to qualify for the
cap.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\12\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\13\ in particular, in that it is
intended to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members and other persons using its
facilities. The Exchange believes that, as proposed, the cap on
transaction fees for Strategy Executions applies equally to each member
(ETP holder) of the Exchange. The Exchange further believes that by
keeping fees low with the proposed cap, the Exchange is able to attract
liquidity by accommodating these transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \14\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\15\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee or other
charge imposed by the Exchange. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
    \16\ For purposes of calculating the 60-day period within which
the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule change under
Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission considers the period
to commence on February 29, 2008, the date on which NYSE Arca filed
Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-24 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-24. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-24 and should be
submitted on or before March 31, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-4556 Filed 3-7-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 75 (Friday, April 18, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21845]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08565]

========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.

The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 75 / Friday, April 18, 2014 / Rules
and Regulations

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1175; Amdt. No. 25-137]
RIN 2120-AJ83

Installed Systems and Equipment for Use by the Flightcrew;
Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; corrections.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) published in the
Federal Register of May 3, 2013 a document amending the design
requirements in the airworthiness standards for transport category
airplanes to minimize the occurrence of design-related flightcrew
errors. This document corrects an inadvertent amendment number that
appears in the heading of the publication of that final rule.

DATES: This correction is effective April 18, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ralen Gao, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-
209, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA published a final rule in the
Federal Register of May 3, 2013 (78 FR 25840), amending the design
requirements in the airworthiness standards for transport category
airplanes to minimize the occurrence of design-related flightcrew
errors. This document corrects an inadvertent amendment number that
appears in the heading of the publication of that final rule.
    In FR Doc. 2013-10554, beginning on page 25840 in the Federal
Register of May 3, 2013, make the following correction:
    On page 25840, in the first column heading, change the amendment
number from ``25-138'' to ``25-137''.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 10, 2014.
Lirio Liu,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. 2014-08565 Filed 4-17-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 146 (Monday, July 30, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36401-36402]
[FR Doc No: 2018-16142]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2017-0754; Airspace Docket No. 17-ASO-16]

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Memphis, TN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends Class E airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface at Memphis International Airport, Memphis, TN.
Airspace reconfiguration is necessary due to the decommissioning of the
Elvis non-directional radio beacon (NDB), and for the safety and
management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations at this airport.
Olive Branch Airport, Olive Branch, MS, is removed from the airspace
description to be reestablished in a separate rulemaking.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, September 13, 2018. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed on line at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11B at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at Memphis International Airport, Memphis, TN to support IFR
operations at the airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (83 FR 19471, May 3, 2018) Docket No. FAA-2017-0754 to amend
Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at
Memphis International Airport, Memphis, TN, due to the decommissioning
of the Elvis NDB and cancellation of the NDB approach, and removal of
Olive Branch Airport, Olive Branch, MS, from the legal description to
redesignate it in a separate rulemaking.
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No
comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11B dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15,
2017, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11B, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017, and effective September 15,
2017. FAA Order 7400.11B is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11B lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 amends Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface within an 8-mile radius of Memphis International Airport,
Memphis, TN. The segment extending from the 8-mile radius of the
airport to 16 miles west of the Elvis NDB is removed due to the
decommissioning of the Elvis NDB and cancellation of the NDB approach,
and for continued safety and management of IFR operations at the
airport.
    Also, this action removes the language that excludes the
Millington, TN, airspace area to comply with FAA Order 7400.2L,
Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters.
    Additionally, the airspace listed in the legal description for
Olive Branch Airport, Olive Branch, MS, is removed and redesignated in
a separate rulemaking.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is certified
that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5a. This airspace action is not expected to
cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120, E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11B,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 3, 2017,
effective September 15, 2017, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASO TN E5 Memphis, TN [Amended]

Memphis International Airport, TN
    (Lat. 35[deg]02'33'' N, long. 89[deg]58'36'' W)
General DeWitt Spain Airport
    (Lat. 35[deg]12'03'' N, long. 90[deg]03'14'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within an 8-mile radius of Memphis International Airport, and within
a 6.4-mile radius of General DeWitt Spain Airport.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on July 19, 2018.
Ryan W. Almasy,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. 2018-16142 Filed 7-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 238 (Monday, December 13, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77570-77572]
[FR Doc No: 2010-31172]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2010-1151; Directorate Identifier 95-ANE-10-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF6 Series
Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede an existing airworthiness
directive (AD) for General Electric (GE) CF6-45/-50 series and CF6-80A
series turbofan engines with certain part number (P/N) side links of
the five-link forward mount assembly installed. That AD currently
requires an initial and repetitive visual inspection of the side links
for cracks, and stripping and reapplying the Sermetel W coating on the
side link at every exposure of the side link. That AD also requires
replacing the side links and pylon attachment bolts, and inspecting the
fail-safe bolt and platform lug if the side links are cracked. This
proposed AD would continue to require those same inspections and
stripping and reapplying the Sermetel W coating, and would add two part
numbers to the applicability. This proposed AD results from a review of
the inspection program, which revealed that GE had omitted two affected
part numbers from the applicability. We are proposing this AD to
prevent failure of the side links and possible engine separation from
the airplane.

DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by February 11,
2011.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tomasz Rakowski, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone (781) 238-
7735; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2010-1151; Directorate
Identifier 95-ANE-10-AD'' in the subject line of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD
in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

Discussion

    The FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 by superseding AD 2006-12-
24, Amendment 39-14650 (71 FR 34807, June 16, 2006). That AD requires
inspecting and stripping and reapplying the Sermetel W coating on the
side links every time one or more of the bolts attaching the side link
to the fan frame--front high-pressure compressor case or the bolt
attaching the side link to the mount platform are removed. That AD
resulted from a report of a cracked side link found during a routine
inspection at a shop visit in 2006. That condition, if not corrected,
could result in failure of the side links and possible engine
separation from the airplane.

Actions Since AD 2006-12-24 Was Issued

    Since that AD was issued, GE performed an evaluation of the
inspection program and determined that they had omitted the P/Ns for
two side links that could be installed on CF6-45/-50 series and CF6-80A
series engines. GE introduced those P/N side links in 2000. The age of
those side links means that they might have experienced only two shop
visits (the average time between shop visits is about four years) since
they were put into service. Also, about 50 percent of the new side
links are spare parts and they might not be installed on any engines in
service yet. Because of those conditions, we haven't received any
reports of cracks in the new P/N links. However, due to the similarity
in design between these additional parts and the parts that are listed
in AD 2006-12-24, the same unsafe condition could exist or develop on
the additional side links. Because there is no requirement to inspect
or strip and reapply the Sermetel W coating on these additional part
numbers in AD 2006-12-24, they might not have been inspected for
cracks, which could lead to part failure. This proposed AD would add
left-hand side link, P/N 9346M99P03, and right-hand side link, P/N
9346M99P04, to the applicability. We have also updated the
applicability section to list the affected engine models in the same
way they are listed on their Type Certificate Data Sheets.

Relevant Service Information

    We have reviewed and approved the technical contents of GE Service
Bulletins CF6-50 S/B 72-1255, Revision 1, dated June 17, 2009, and CF6-
80A S/B 72-0797, Revision 1, dated June 17, 2009, that describe
procedures for inspecting and stripping and reapplying the Sermetel W
coating on the side links.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. For that reason, we are proposing this AD,
which would require inspecting and stripping and reapplying the
Sermetel W coating on the side links at each exposure of the side link.
The proposed AD would require that you do these actions using the
service information described previously.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 194 engines
installed on airplanes of U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 8 work-hours per engine to perform the proposed actions, and
that the average labor rate is $85 per work-hour. We estimate the parts
cost to be negligible because only a small percentage of parts will
actually require replacement as a result of this proposed AD. Based on
these figures, we estimate the total cost of the proposed AD to U.S.
operators to be $131,920 per year.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. See the ADDRESSES section for a location
to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-14650 (71 FR
34807, June 16, 2006), and by adding a new airworthiness directive to
read as follows:

General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2010-1151; Directorate
Identifier 95-ANE-10-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by February 11,
2011.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2006-12-24, Amendment 39-14650.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to General Electric (GE) CF6-45A, CF6-45A2,
CF6-50A, CF6-50C, CF6-50CA, CF6-50C1, CF6-50C2, CF6-50C2B, CF6-
50C2D, CF6-50E, CF6-50E1, CF6-50E2, CF6-50E2B, CF6-80A, CF6-80A1,
CF6-80A2, and CF6-80A3 turbofan engines with left-hand side links
part numbers (P/Ns) 9204M94P01, 9204M94P03, 9346M99P01, and
9346M99P03, and right-hand side links, P/Ns 9204M94P02, 9204M94P04,
9346M99P02, and 9346M99P04, installed on the five-link forward
engine mount assembly (also known

as Configuration 2). These engines are installed on, but not limited
to, Boeing DC-10-30, DC-10-30F (KC-10A, KDC-10), 767, and 747 series
airplanes and Airbus A300 and A310 series airplanes.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from a review of the inspection program,
which revealed that GE had omitted two affected part numbers from
the applicability. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of the
side links and possible engine separation from the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed at every exposure of the side link.

Inspecting and Stripping and Reapplying the Sermetel W Coating on the
Side Links

    (f) Inspect and strip and reapply the Sermetel W coating on each
side link at every exposure of the side links. Use the following GE
service bulletins (SBs):
    (1) For CF6-45/-50 series engines, use paragraphs 3.A. through
3.E. of the Accomplishment Instructions of CF6-50 S/B 72-1255,
Revision 1, dated June 17, 2009.
    (2) For CF6-80A series engines, use paragraphs 3.A. through 3.E.
of the Accomplishment Instructions of CF6-80A S/B 72-0797, Revision
1, dated June 17, 2009.

Definition of Exposure of Side Link

    (g) A side link is exposed when one or more bolts that attach
the side links to the fan frame-front high-pressure compressor case
are removed, or when the bolt attaching the side link to the mount
platform is removed.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (h) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Related Information

    (i) Contact Tomasz Rakowski, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; telephone (781) 238-
7735; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for more information about this AD.
    (j) General Electric SBs CF6-50 S/B 72-1255, Revision 1, dated
June 17, 2009, and CF6-80A S/B 72-0797, Revision 1, dated June 17,
2009, pertain to the subject of this AD. Contact General Electric
Aviation Operations Center (AOC), telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
(877) 432-3329; or go to: https://customer.geae.com, for a copy of
this service information.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on November 17, 2010.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2010-31172 Filed 12-10-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 103 (Friday, May 27, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32171-32172]
[FR Doc No: 2022-11410]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2019-D-2808]

Advanced Prostate Cancer: Developing Gonadotropin-Releasing
Hormone Analogues; Guidance for Industry; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or Agency) is announcing
the availability of a final guidance for industry entitled ``Advanced
Prostate Cancer: Developing Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues.''
This guidance describes FDA's current recommendations regarding the
overall development program and clinical trial designs for developing
gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues to treat advanced
prostate cancer. This guidance finalizes the draft guidance of the same
title issued in July 2019.

DATES: The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal
Register on May 27, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit either electronic or written comments on
Agency guidances at any time as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2019-D-2808 for ``Advanced Prostate Cancer: Developing
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues; Guidance for Industry.''
Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those
submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish
your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you
can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of
your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://

www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)).
    Submit written requests for single copies of this guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
Food and Drug Administration, 10001 New Hampshire Ave., Hillandale
Building, 4th Floor, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send one self-
addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing your
requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the guidance document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elaine Chang, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 2169, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-2628.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a guidance for industry
entitled ``Advanced Prostate Cancer: Developing Gonadotropin-Releasing
Hormone Analogues.'' This guidance describes FDA's current
recommendations regarding the overall development program and clinical
trial designs for developing GnRH analogues to treat advanced prostate
cancer.
    This guidance finalizes the draft guidance of the same title issued
on July 18, 2019 (84 FR 34400). FDA considered comments received on the
draft guidance as the guidance was finalized. Changes from the draft to
the final guidance included clarifying the scope of the guidance in the
introduction section, adding recommendations on safety monitoring, and
broadening recommendations on the appropriate trial population to
include metastatic as well as biochemically recurrent disease rather
than only metastatic.
    This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
current thinking of FDA on ``Advanced Prostate Cancer: Developing
Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Analogues.'' It does not establish any
rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can
use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    While this guidance contains no collection of information, it does
refer to previously approved FDA collections of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521) is not
required for this guidance. The previously approved collections of
information are subject to review by the OMB under the PRA. The
collections of information in 21 CFR part 210 and 211, 21 CFR part 314,
and 21 CFR part 601 have been approved under OMB control numbers 0910-
0139, 0910-0001, and 0910-0338, respectively. The collections of
information in 21 CFR part 312 have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0014. The collections of information in 21 CFR 201.56 and
201.57 for the content and format of labeling for human prescription
drug and biological products have been approved under OMB control
number 0910-0572. The collections of information in 21 CFR part 58 for
good laboratory practice have been approved under OMB control number
0910-0119.

III. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the internet may obtain the guidance at
either https://www.fda.gov/drugs/guidance-compliance-regulatory-information/guidances-drugs, https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents, or https://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: May 23, 2022.
Lauren K. Roth,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2022-11410 Filed 5-26-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: July 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 142)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 42725-42727]
[DOCID:fr23jy08-15]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2007-0419; Directorate Identifier 2007-NE-52-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; General Electric Company CF34-1A, -3A,
-3A1, -3A2, -3B, and -3B1 Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for General Electric Company (GE) CF34-1A, -3A, -3A1, -3A2, -3B, and -
3B1 turbofan engines with high-pressure (HP) rotor 4-step air balance
piston stationary seals (4-step seals), part numbers 4923T54G01,
6019T90G03, 6037T99G01, 6037T99G02, and 6037T99G03, installed. This
proposed AD would require removing the 4-step seals and incorporating
an 8-step seal at

the next piece-part exposure. This proposed AD results from the
investigation of an airplane accident. Both engines experienced high-
altitude flameouts. Rotation of the HP rotors was not maintained during
descent and the engines could not be restarted. We are proposing this
AD to prevent the inability to restart both engines after flameout due
to excessive friction of the 4-step seal, which could result in
subsequent forced landing of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive any comments on this proposed AD by September
22, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to comment on this
proposed AD.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You can get the service information identified in this proposed AD
from General Electric Company via Lockheed Martin Technology Services,
10525 Chester Road, Suite C, Cincinnati, Ohio 45215, telephone (513)
672-8400, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenneth Steeves, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax: (781) 238-
7199.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send us any written relevant data, views, or
arguments regarding this proposal. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2007-0419; Directorate
Identifier 2007-NE-52-AD'' in the subject line of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend the proposed AD
in light of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets. This includes, if provided, the name of the individual
who sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http: //
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

Discussion

    In October 2004, a Bombardier CL600-2B19 Regional Jet airplane
experienced high-altitude flameouts of both engines while on a ferry
flight. After flameout, when the airplane was descending, sufficient
airspeed was not maintained to ensure rotation of the HP rotors and
they stopped rotating. During repeated unsuccessful engine restart
attempts on both engines, the HP rotors did not obtain sufficient
rotational speeds for the engines to restart. The airplane eventually
crashed while attempting to glide to an airport, and the crew was
fatally injured. When these engines experience a high-altitude
flameout, the engines are immediately subjected to rapid cooling due to
the extremely cold air flowing around and through them. The static seal
parts cool more rapidly than the rotors, and shrink until they contact
the rotating seal surfaces. If the speed of the airplane is not
sufficient to maintain windmill rotation of the HP rotors, the rotors
will stop rotating and could lock if sufficient friction develops
between the rotating and static air balance piston seal surfaces. This
condition, if not corrected, could result in the inability to restart
the engines and the subsequent forced landing of the airplane.
Investigation by GE determined that under certain conditions, the
existing 4-step seals used in CF34-1A, -3A, -3A1, -3A2, -3B, and -3B1
turbofan engines can come into contact with the rotating seal surfaces
and create friction. In a worse case, this friction could cause locking
of the HP rotors, called ``rotor lock''. GE is introducing 8-step seals
for all CF34-1A, -3A, -3A1, -3A2, -3B, and -3B1 turbofan engines. The
8-step seals will reduce potential drag in the rotor system and enhance
the windmilling capabilities of HP rotors. This will ultimately reduce
the possibility of the HP rotor locking after a high-altitude flameout
when HP rotor rotation is not maintained during descent.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    We have evaluated all pertinent information and identified an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on other products
of this same type design. We are proposing this AD, which would require
removing the 4-step seal at next piece-part exposure and incorporating
an 8-step seal, either by modifying the existing 4-step seal to an 8-
step seal or by replacing it with an 8-step seal.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 2,722 CF34-1A, -3A,
-3A1, -3A2, -3B, and -3B1 turbofan engines installed on airplanes of
U.S. registry. We also estimate that this proposed AD will not impose
any additional labor or material costs as most of the seals will
require replacement when they are removed from the engine during
scheduled engine overhaul. For those few seals that can be reworked, we
estimate that it would take about 5 work-hours per engine to perform
the proposed seal modification, and that the average labor rate is $80
per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost of
the proposed AD to U.S. operators to be $108,800.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
subtitle VII, part A, subpart III, section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations

for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that
is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking
action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the proposed AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator, the
Federal Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new
airworthiness directive:

General Electric Company: Docket No. FAA-2007-0419; Directorate
Identifier 2007-NE-52-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must receive
comments on this airworthiness directive (AD) action by September
22, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to General Electric Company (GE) CF34-1A, -
3A, -3A1, -3A2, -3B, and -3B1 turbofan engines, with high-pressure
(HP) rotor 4-step air balance piston stationary seals (4-step
seals), part numbers (P/Ns) 4923T54G01, 6019T90G03, 6037T99G01,
6037T99G02, and 6037T99G03, installed. These engines are installed
on, but not limited to, Bombardier, Inc. airplane models CL-600-
2A12, -2B16, and -2B19.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from the investigation of an airplane
accident. Both engines experienced high-altitude flameouts. Rotation
of the HP rotors was not maintained during descent and the engines
could not be restarted. We are issuing this AD to prevent the
inability to restart both engines after flameout due to excessive
friction of the 4-step seal, which could result in subsequent forced
landing of the airplane.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed at the next piece-part exposure after the effective
date of this AD, unless the actions have already been done.
    (f) Remove the 4-step seals, P/Ns 4923T54G01, 6019T90G03,
6037T99G01, 6037T99G02, and 6037T99G03.
    (g) Incorporate an 8-step seal, either by modifying the existing
4-step seal to an 8-step seal, or by replacing it with an 8-step
seal.
    (h) Information on modifying the seal and part number
configuration charts, can be found in GE Service Bulletin (SB) No.
CF34-AL S/B 72-0238, dated July 27, 2007 (CL-600-2B19), and SB No.
CF34-BJ S/B 72-0217, dated July 27, 2007 (CL-600-2A12 and CL-600-
2B16).

Definition

    (i) For the purposes of this AD, piece-part exposure means when
the 4-step seal is removed from the combustion module in accordance
with the disassembly instructions in the engine manufacturer's, or
other FAA-approved engine manual.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (j) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, has the authority
to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Related Information

    (k) Contact Kenneth Steeves, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, Engine and Propeller Directorate, FAA, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax: (781) 238-
7199; for more information about this AD.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on July 16, 2008.
Marc Bouthillier,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E8-16884 Filed 7-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 2, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 37622-37623]
[FR Doc No: 2014-15274]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

21 CFR Part 558

[Docket No. FDA-2014-N-0002]

New Animal Drugs for Use in Animal Feeds; Chlortetracycline and
Sulfamethazine; Chlortetracycline; Procaine Penicillin; and
Sulfamethazine

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal
drug regulations to reflect the withdrawal of approval of those parts
of a new animal drug application (NADA) for a three-way, fixed-ratio,
combination drug Type A medicated article that pertain to use of the
procaine penicillin component for growth promotion indications in swine
and to reflect the reformulation of the Type A medicated article as a
two-way, fixed-ratio, combination drug product without penicillin.

DATES: This rule is effective July 2, 2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cindy L. Burnsteel, Center for
Veterinary Medicine (HFV-130), Food and Drug Administration, 7500
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Zoetis Inc. (Zoetis), 333 Portage St.,
Kalamazoo, MI 49007 has requested that FDA withdraw approval of those
parts of NADA 035-688 for AUREOMIX Granular 500 (chlortetracycline,
procaine penicillin, and sulfamethazine) Type A medicated article that
pertain to use of the procaine penicillin component for growth
promotion indications in swine. Zoetis requested voluntary withdrawal
of approval of these indications for use because AUREOMIX Granular 500
Type A medicated article is no longer manufactured.
    With the withdrawal of approval of the production indications for
procaine penicillin, the product approved under NADA 035-688 was
reformulated as AUREOMIX S Granular (chlortetracycline and
sulfamethazine) Type A Medicated Article, a two-way, fixed-ratio,
combination drug Type A medicated article that does not contain
penicillin procaine and is not labeled for production indications.
    The Agency has determined under 21 CFR 25.33(a)(3) and (g) that
these actions are categorically excluded from the requirement to submit
an environmental assessment or an environmental impact statement
because they are of a type that do not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human environment.
    Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA gave notice
that the approval of those parts of NADA 035-688 pertaining to the
procaine penicillin component indications for growth promotion and
increased feed efficiency in swine is withdrawn, effective July 2,
2014. As provided for in the regulatory text of this document, the
animal drug regulations are amended to reflect this partial withdrawal
of approval and subsequent product reformulation.
    NADA 035-688 was identified as being affected by guidance for
industry (GFI) 213, ``New Animal Drugs and New Animal Drug
Combination Products Administered in or on Medicated Feed or Drinking
Water of Food-Producing Animals: Recommendations for Drug Sponsors for
Voluntarily Aligning Product Use Conditions With GFI 209'',
December 2013.
    This rule does not meet the definition of ``rule'' in 5 U.S.C.
804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ``particular applicability.''
Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements
in 5 U.S.C. 801-808.

List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 558

    Animal drugs, Animal feeds.

    Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner of Food and Drugs and
redelegated to the Director of the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 558 is amended as follows:

PART 558--NEW ANIMAL DRUGS FOR USE IN ANIMAL FEEDS

0
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 558 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  21 U.S.C. 360b, 371.

0
2. Revise Sec.  558.140 to read as follows:

Sec.  558.140  Chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine.

    (a) Specifications. Type A medicated articles containing:
    (1) 35 grams (g) per pound (/lb) each, chlortetracycline and
sulfamethazine.
    (2) 40 g/lb each, chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine.
    (b) Sponsors. See sponsors numbers in Sec.  510.600(c) of this
chapter as follow:
    (1) Nos. 054771 and 048164 for use of product described in
paragraph (a)(1) as in paragraph (d)(1) of this section.
    (2) No. 054771 for use of product described in paragraph (a)(2) as
in paragraph (d)(2) of this section.
    (c) Related tolerances. See Sec. Sec.  556.150 and 556.670 of this
chapter.
    (d) Conditions of use--(1) Cattle. It is used in feed for beef
cattle as follows:
    (i) Amount. 350 milligrams per head per day each, chlortetracycline
and sulfamethazine.
    (ii) Indications for use. Aid in the maintenance of weight gains in
the presence of respiratory disease such as shipping fever.
    (iii) Limitations. Feed for 28 days; withdraw 7 days prior to
slaughter. A withdrawal period has not been established for this
product in pre-ruminating calves. Do not use in calves to be processed
for veal.
    (2) Swine. It is used in swine feed as follows:
    (i) Amount. 100 g/ton each, chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine.

    (ii) Indications for use. For reduction of the incidence of
cervical abscesses; treatment of bacterial swine enteritis
(salmonellosis or necrotic enteritis caused by Salmonella choleraesuis
and vibrionic dysentery); prevention of these diseases during times of
stress; and maintenance of weight gains in the presence of atrophic
rhinitis.
    (iii) Limitations. Feed as the sole ration. Withdraw 15 days prior
to slaughter.

Sec.  558.145  [Amended]

0
3. In Sec.  558.145, in paragraph (a)(2), remove ``Nos. 048164 and
054771'' and in its place add ``No. 048164''.

    Dated: June 25, 2014.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. 2014-15274 Filed 6-30-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 95 (Tuesday, May 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29999-30000]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10510]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2022-0030]

Agency Request for Information; State Electronic Data Collection
Grant Program: Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
received one petition to extend the comment period for a request for
information (RFI) notice on the agency's efforts to develop and
implement a new discretionary grant program to increase the number of
States, U.S. territories, and Indian tribes electronically transferring
their motor vehicle crash data to NHTSA. NHTSA published an RFI notice
requesting information from interested parties on April 29, 2022. The
comment period for the RFI notice was scheduled to end on May 31, 2022.
NHTSA is extending the comment period for the April 29, 2022, RFI
notice by 45 days.

DATES: The comment period for the RFI notice published on April 29,
2022 is extended to July 15, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments to the docket number identified in
the heading of this document by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Eastern Time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you, please call<PHONE_NUMBER> before
coming.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Regardless of how you submit your comments, please mention the
docket number identified in the heading of this document.
    Note that all comments received will be posted without change to
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments

from the public to better inform its decision-making process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.transportation.gov/privacy. In order to facilitate comment tracking
and response, the Agency encourages commenters to provide their name,
or the name of their organization; however, submission of names is
completely optional. Whether or not commenters identify themselves, all
timely comments will be fully considered.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to www.regulations.gov, or the street address
listed above. To be sure someone is there to help you, please call
(202) 366-9332 before coming. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical issues, you may contact
Ms. Barbara Rhea, State Data Reporting Systems Division Chief, NHTSA
(phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>) or you may send an email to Ms. Rhea at
[email protected]. Address: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Building, Washington, DC 20590.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On April 29, 2022, pursuant to Section
24108(d) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, NHTSA published
an RFI notice seeking comment on its plans to develop a new State
electronic data collection program that requires NHTSA to develop and
implement a new discretionary grant program. The new grant program is
to provide support to States to upgrade and standardize their State
crash data systems to enable electronic data collection, intrastate
data sharing, and electronic data transfer to NHTSA. The new program
will increase the accuracy, timeliness, and accessibility of the data
including data relating to fatalities involving vulnerable road users
to States and NHTSA. See Public Law 117-58, 24108(d)(3), 135 Stat 429.
Eligible States \1\ may use these grants for the costs of equipment to
upgrade a statewide crash data repository; adoption of electronic crash
reporting by law enforcement agencies and increasing alignment of State
crash data with the latest Model Minimum Uniform Crash Criteria.\2\
This notice requests information from interested parties, including
State crash data owners, highway safety offices, law enforcement, and
other stakeholders to assist NHTSA in the development of a new State
electronic data collection program that supports State crash data
system improvements, enhances NHTSA's National Center for Statistics
and Analysis (NCSA) data infrastructure where these data will be
stored, and shares a subset of the resulting data with the public.
NHTSA plans to utilize the information provided under this RFI notice
to enhance and support the development of the State electronic data
collection discretionary grant program. The comment period for the RFI
notice was scheduled to end on May 31, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Under BIL, ``State'' is defined as each of the 50 States,
District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the U.S.
Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa, the Commonwealth of Northern
Mariana Islands and the Secretary of the Interior, acting on behalf
of an Indian Tribe. See Public Law 117-58, 24108(d)(1)(A).
    \2\ Sec.  24108(d)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment Period Extension Requests

    The Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) requested a 60-day
extension of the comment period. The requestor states that the RFI
notice addresses several complex topics that would require conducting
in-depth review and analysis to develop informed feedback. They
suggested the additional time would allow them to conduct the detailed
review of the notice and develop appropriate responses. The requestor
stated that the additional time would allow for more fully developed
feedback to support the agency's next steps.

Agency Decision

    NHTSA determined that the requestor provided sufficient
justification for an extension, and that the extension is consistent
with the public interest. NHTSA agrees that allowing additional time
for the public and its stakeholders to provide comments to the
questions raised in the RFI notice would better inform NHTSA regarding
the various program areas and topics discussed in the RFI notice.
Therefore, NHTSA is granting the aforementioned request to extend the
comment period; however, NHTSA is extending it for 45 days. A 45-day
extension appropriately balances NHTSA's interest in providing the
public with sufficient time to comment on the questions raised in the
RFI notice with its interest to pursue development of this program in a
timely manner and its ability to present proposals at the 2022 Traffic
Records Forum, scheduled for August 7-10, 2022.
    Authority: S. 24108, Pub. L. 117-58, 135 Stat 429; 49 U.S.C. 30166
and 30182; delegation of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 49 CFR 501.8.

Chou-Lin Chen,
Associate Administrator for the National Center for Statistics and
Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2022-10510 Filed 5-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 223 (Wednesday, November 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 73533]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25350]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-657, OMB Control No. 3235-0705]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 30b1-8 and Form N-CR

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (``Paperwork Reduction Act'') (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'') is soliciting
comments on the collections of information summarized below. The
Commission plans to submit this existing collection of information to
the Office of Management and Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 30b1-8 under the Act [17 CFR 270.30b1-8], entitled ``Current
Report for Money Market Funds,'' provides that every registered open-
end management investment company, or series thereof, that is regulated
as a money market fund under rule 2a-7 [17 CFR 270.2a-7], that
experiences any of the events specified on Form N-CR [17 CFR 274.222],
must file with the Commission a current report on Form N-CR within the
time period specified in that form. The information collection
requirements for rule 30b1-8 and Form N-CR are designed to assist
Commission staff in its oversight of money market funds and its ability
to respond to market events. It also provides investors with better and
timelier disclosure of potentially important events. Finally, the
Commission is able to use the information provided on Form N-CR in its
regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles. The
rule imposes a burden per report of approximately 8.5 hours and
$1018.5, so that the total annual burden for the estimated 6 reports
filed per year on Form N-CR is 51 hours and $19,839.
    The estimate of average burden hours is made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. The estimate is based on
communications with industry representatives, and is not derived from a
comprehensive or even a representative survey or study.
    The collection of information on Form N-CR is mandatory for any
fund that holds itself out as a money market fund in reliance on rule
2a-7. Responses will not be kept confidential. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information has practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's estimate of the burden(s)
of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information collected; and (d) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques or other
forms of information technology. Consideration will be given to
comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60 days of this
publication.
    Please direct your written comments to David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Cynthia
Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549; or send an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: November 12, 2020.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-25350 Filed 11-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P