[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 39 (Tuesday, February 27, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 8485]
[FR Doc No: 2018-03925]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2017-N-3203]

Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al.; Withdrawal of Approval of 121
New Drug Applications and 161 Abbreviated New Drug Applications;
Correction

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is correcting a notice
that appeared in the Federal Register of June 21, 2017 (82 FR 28322).
The document announced the withdrawal of approval of 121 new drug
applications (NDAs) and 161 abbreviated new drug applications from
multiple applicants, withdrawn as of July 21, 2017. The document
indicated that FDA was withdrawing approval of NDA 204508, Clinolipid
20% (olive oil and soybean oil) USP, 16%/4%, after receiving a request
from the NDA holder, Baxter Healthcare Corp. (Baxter), 32650 N Wilson
Rd., Round Lake, IL 60073. Before the approval of NDA 204508 was
withdrawn, Baxter informed FDA that it did not want the approval of
this NDA withdrawn. Because Baxter timely requested that approval of
this NDA not be withdrawn, the approval of NDA 204508 is still in
effect.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Florine Purdie, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, Rm. 6366, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-3601.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the Federal Register of Wednesday, June
21, 2017, appearing on page 28322 in FR Doc. 2017-12908, the following
correction is made:
    On page 28329, in table 1, the entry for NDA 204508 is removed.

    Dated: February 21, 2018.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2018-03925 Filed 2-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 83 (Monday, May 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 26629]
[FR Doc No: 2023-09266]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2 p.m. on Thursday, May 4, 2023.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners,
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date,
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10),
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202)
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: April 27, 2023.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-09266 Filed 4-27-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


 MEMORANDUM

DATE:01/22/2015 FROM: 		Laura Farris/EPA Region 8 TO:CLEAN Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR - 2013-0602 SUBJECT:	Center for the New Energy Economy's Western States Meeting on 01/22/2015

SUMMARY:         Callie Videtich, EPA Region 8 Acting Assistant Regional Administrator, attended the Center for the New Energy Economy's Western States Meeting on 01/22/2015 to discuss the Clean Power Plan. The meeting was held in in Phoenix, Arizona. The Clean Power Plan was proposed on June 2, 2014.

ATTENDEES:

EPA Callie Videtich, EPA Region 8, Acting Assistant Regional Administrator Colleen	McKaughan, EPA Region 9 Kate Kelly, EPA Region 10

External Stakeholders First Name Last Name Company Henry Darwin Arizona Eric Massey Arizona Steve Burr Arizona Tracy Terry Bipartisan Policy Center Kristen Driskell California Energy Commission Tung Le CARB Dennis Arfmann Center for the New Energy Economy Patrick Cummins Center for the New Energy Economy Jeff Lyng Center for the New Energy Economy Tom Plant Center for the New Energy Economy Bill Ritter Center for the New Energy Economy Will Allison Colorado Martha Rudolph Colorado Jeff Burks Energy Strategies Rick Sprott Energy Strategies Gibson Peters Energy Strategies Scott Pugrud Idaho Tim Baker Montana Eugenia Quintana Navajo Nation Raju Bisht Navajo Nation April Quinn Navajo Nation Colleen Cripps Nevada Dave Emme Nevada Cindy Hollenberg New Mexico Anne Jakle New Mexico Terry O'Clair North Dakota Elizabeth Osborne NW Power and Conservation Council Colin McConnaha Oregon Jessica Shipley Oregon Department of Energy John Larsen Rhodium Group Brian Gustafson South Dakota Glade Sowards Utah Division of Air Quality Bill Drumheller Washington Vijay Satyal WECC Jeff Gabler WESTAR Dan Johnson WESTAR Tom Carr Western Interstate Energy Board Alaine Ginocchio Western Interstate Energy Board Steve Dietrich Wyoming Todd Parfitt Wyoming


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 64 (Friday, April 3, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 18175-18177]
[FR Doc No: 2015-07504]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 110

[Docket Number USCG-2014-0991]
RIN 1625-AA01

Anchorage Grounds; Lower Mississippi River Below Baton Rouge, LA,
Including South and Southwest Passes; New Orleans, LA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is considering amending the regulations for
Cedar Grove Anchorage and establishing two new anchorages, Point
Michele Anchorage and Plaquemines Point Anchorage on the Lower
Mississippi River (LMR), Above Head of Passes (AHP). These actions are
being considered to increase the available anchorage areas in this
section of the river necessary to accommodate vessel traffic and
improve navigation safety for vessels transiting this area, providing
for the overall safe and efficient flow of vessel traffic and commerce.
The Coast Guard is seeking comments and information about what form the
proposed amendment and new regulations should take and the actual need
for them.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 2, 2015. Requests for a public meeting must be
received on or before April 20, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Documents mentioned in this preamble are part of Docket
Number USCG-2014-0991. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as
being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov, type
the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on
``Open Docket Folder'' on the line associated with this rulemaking. You
may also visit the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    You may submit comments, identified by docket number, using any one
of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Commander (LCDR) Christopher Tuckey, Waterways
Management, District Eight, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing
or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl F. Collins, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

AHP Above Head of Passes
CFR Code of Federal Regulation
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
LMR Lower Mississippi River
LWRP Low Water Reference Point
MNSA Maritime Navigation Safety Association
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket

Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a telephone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.''
Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with this
rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.''
Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with this advance
notice of proposed rulemaking. The following Web address should take
you directly to the docket: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=USCG-2014-0991. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one, using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Requests for a public meeting must be received on or before April 20,
2015. Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be
beneficial. If we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will
hold one at a time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal
Register.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    Under title 33 Code of Federal Regulation (CFR) Sec.  109.05, U.S.
Coast Guard District Commanders are delegated the authority to
establish anchorage grounds by the Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard.
The Coast Guard establishes Anchorage Grounds under authority of the
authority in section 7 of the act of March 4, 1915, as amended (38
Stat. 1053; 33 U.S.C. 471) and places these regulations in title 33 CFR
part 110, subpart B. [CGFR 67-46, 32 FR 17728, Dec. 12, 1967, as
amended by CGD 86-082, 52 FR 33811, Sept. 8, 1987; USCG-1998-3799, 63
FR 5526, June 30, 1998]. The Coast Guard is now considering a proposed
rulemaking to amend an existing anchorage ground, Cedar Grove
Anchorage, 33 CFR 110.195(a)(12), and to establish two new anchorage
grounds: Point Michele Anchorage and Plaquemines Point Anchorage.

C. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis and authorities for this advance notice of proposed
rulemaking are found in 33 U.S.C. 471, 1221 through 1236, 2071; 33 CFR
1.05-1, Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to propose, establish, and
define regulatory anchorages. The Coast Guard is considering an
amendment to increase the size of the existing Cedar Grove Anchorage,
established under 33 CFR 110.195(a)(12). The Coast Guard is also
considering establishing two new anchorage grounds; Point Michele
Anchorage and Plaquemines Point Anchorage.
    The Coast Guard received requests from the Crescent River Port
Pilot's Association and the New Orleans Baton Rouge River Pilot's
Association to consider amending an existing anchorage and establishing
two new anchorages. These requests were presented and discussed at a
Maritime Navigation Safety Association (MNSA) meeting on August 12,
2014 and at a Port Safety Council Meeting on September 10, 2014. At
both meetings, there were no objections or comments received from
attendees.
    The purpose of this ANPRM is to solicit input and comments on
potential proposed rulemakings to: (1) Increase the available anchorage
areas in this section of the river necessary to help accommodate
increasing vessel traffic; and (2) improve navigation safety for
vessels transiting this river section. The objective would be to
establish additional anchorage areas intended to increase the safety of
life and property on navigable waters, while ensuring that the needs
and concerns of all stakeholders are addressed through the rulemaking
process. More specifically, the objective is to improve the safety of
anchored vessels in Cedar Grove Anchorage and provide for two
additional anchorage areas to address the increased waterway congestion
improve the overall safe and efficient flow of vessel traffic and
commerce.

D. Discussion

    The Coast Guard is considering amending the Cedar Grove Anchorage
so that the anchorage's overall length would be increased by two (2)
tenths of a mile, shifting the lower limit down river four (4) tenths
of a mile from mile 69.9 to mile 69.5 and shifting the upper limit down
river from mile 71.1 to mile 70.9. With such a change, we would see the
need to move and rename the Upper Anchorage Daybeacon Light List Number
(LLNR) 13570 and Lower Anchorage Daybeacon LLNR 13555.
    You may find a picture with an illustration of the amended
anchorage we are considering in our online docket (http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=USCG-2014-0991). Look for
Illustration of Contemplated Cedar Grove Anchorage.
    The existing Cedar Grove Anchorage is described in 33 CFR
110.195(a)(12).
    The Coast Guard is also considering establishing two new
anchorages. One would be at Point Michele and another at Plaquemines
Point.
    For the Point Michele anchorage we are considering an area 1.2
miles in length along the right descending bank of the river extending
from mile 40.8 to mile 42.0 Above Head of Passes that would be
approximately 500 feet wide. We are considering making the inner
boundary of the anchorage a line parallel to the nearest bank 400 feet
from the water's edge into the river as measured from the low water
reference plane (LWRP). We are considering making the outer boundary of
the anchorage a line parallel to the nearest bank 900 feet from the
water's edge into the river as measured from the LWRP.
    You can find a drawing of this contemplated anchorage in the
docket. Look for Illustration of Contemplated Point Michele Anchorage.
    For the Plaquemines Point Anchorage we are considering an area 0.5
miles in length along the right descending bank of the river extending
from mile 203.9 to mile 204.4 Above Head of Passes

approximately 500 feet wide. We are considering making the inner
boundary of the anchorage a line parallel to the nearest bank 500 feet
from the water's edge into the river as measured from the LWRP and
making the outer boundary of the anchorage a line parallel to the
nearest bank 1000 feet from the water's edge into the river as measured
from the LWRP. Look for Illustration of Contemplated Plaquemines Point
Anchorage to find a drawing of this contemplated anchorage in the
docket.

E. Information Requested

    Public participation is requested to assist in determining the best
way forward in developing a rulemaking to amend and establish anchorage
areas on the LMR. To aid us in developing a proposed rule, we seek any
comments, whether positive or negative, including but not limited to
the impacts an increase in anchorage area may have on navigation safety
and current vessel traffic in this area of the LMR. Please submit any
comments or concerns you may have in accordance with the ``submitting
comments'' section above.
    This document is issued under authority of 5 U.S.C. 552; 33 CFR
1.05-1, and 1.05-30.

    Dated: March 17, 2015.
K.S. Cook,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Eighth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015-07504 Filed 4-2-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 242 (Wednesday, December 16, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81463-81464]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27655]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG21-51-000.
    Applicants: Flat Ridge 2 Wind Energy LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Flat Ridge 2 Wind Energy LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/10/20.
    Accession Number: 20201210-5051.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/31/20.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-1907-019; ER10-1918-020; ER10-1930-013; ER10-
1931-014; ER10-1932-015; ER10-1935-015; ER10-1950-020; ER10-1951-027;
ER10-1962-015; ER10-1964-017; ER10-1966-014; ER10-1970-019; ER10-1972-
019; ER10-1973-014; ER10-1974-025; ER10-1975-027; ER10-1976-013; ER10-
2641-037; ER10-2720-023; ER11-2642-017; ER11-3635-014; ER11-4428-023;
ER11-4462-048; ER11-4677-016; ER12-1228-023; ER12-1880-022; ER12-2225-
013; ER12-2226-013; ER12-2444-015; ER12-895-021; ER13-2112-011; ER13-
2147-002; ER14-1630-011; ER14-21-008; ER14-2138-010; ER14-2707-018;
ER14-2710-018; ER15-1375-009; ER15-2101-009; ER15-2477-009; ER15-2601-
007; ER15-2602-006; ER15-58-016; ER16-1354-009; ER16-1872-010; ER16-
2241-011; ER16-2275-011; ER16-2276-011; ER16-2297-011; ER16-2443-006;
ER16-2506-011; ER16-90-009; ER17-1774-005; ER17-2340-006; ER17-822-006;
ER17-823-006; ER17-838-023; ER18-1535-006; ER18-1771-009; ER18-1952-
009; ER18-2003-007; ER18-2182-007; ER18-2246-008; ER18-241-005; ER18-
772-005; ER19-11-005; ER19-1392-005; ER19-2389-004; ER19-2398-004;
ER20-1220-001; ER20-1879-001; ER20-1988-001; ER20-2012-002; ER20-2019-
001; ER20-2064-001; ER20-2648-001; ER20-2690-001; ER20-2695-001; ER20-
792-002.
    Applicants: FPL Energy North Dakota Wind, LLC, FPL Energy North
Dakota Wind II, LLC, FPL Energy South Dakota Wind, LLC, FPL Energy
Stateline II, Inc., FPL Energy Vansycle, L.L.C., FPL Energy Wyman, LLC,
FPL Energy Wyman IV, LLC, Frontier Utilities Northeast LLC, Garden
Wind, LLC, Genesis Solar, LLC, Golden Hills Interconnection, LLC,
Golden Hills North Wind, LLC, Golden Hills Wind, LLC, Golden West Power
Partners, LLC, Gray County Wind, LLC, Grazing Yak Solar, LLC, Green
Mountain Storage, LLC, Gulf Power Company, Hancock County Wind, LLC,
Hatch Solar Energy Center I, LLC, Heartland Divide Wind Project, LLC,
High Lonesome Mesa Wind, LLC, High Majestic Wind I, LLC, High Majestic
Wind II, LLC, High Winds, LLC, Jordan Creek Wind Farm LLC, Kingman Wind
Energy I, LLC, Kingman Wind Energy II, LLC, Lake Benton Power Partners
II, LLC, Langdon Renewables, LLC, Limon Wind, LLC, Limon Wind II, LLC,
Limon Wind III, LLC, Live Oak Solar, LLC, Logan Wind Energy LLC,
Lorenzo Wind, LLC, Luz Solar Partners Ltd., III, Luz Solar Partners
Ltd., IV, Luz Solar Partners Ltd., V, Mammoth Plains Wind Project, LLC,
Mantua Creek Solar, LLC, Marshall Solar, LLC, McCoy Solar, LLC,
Meyersdale Storage, LLC, Minco Wind, LLC, Minco Wind II, LLC, Minco
Wind III, LLC, Minco IV & V Interconnection, LLC, Minco Wind
Interconnection Services, LLC, Mohave County Wind Farm LLC, Montauk
Energy Storage Center, LLC, Montauk Energy Storage Center, LLC,
Mountain View Solar, LLC, NEPM II, LLC, New Mexico Wind, LLC, NextEra
Blythe Solar Energy Center, LLC, NextEra Energy Bluff Point, LLC,
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold, LLC, NextEra Energy Montezuma II Wind,
LLC, NextEra Energy Point Beach, LLC, NextEra Energy Marketing, LLC,
NextEra Energy Seabrook, LLC, NextEra Energy Services Massachusetts,
LLC, Northeast Energy Associates, A Limited Partnership, Ninnescah Wind
Energy, LLC, North Jersey Energy Associates, A Limited Partnership,
North Sky River Energy, LLC, Northern Colorado Wind Energy, LLC,
Northern Colorado Wind Energy Center II, LLC, Northern Divide Wind,
LLC, Oleander Power Project, Limited Partnership, Oliver Wind I, LLC,
Oliver Wind Energy Center II, LLC, Oliver Wind III, LLC, Oklahoma Wind,
LLC, Orbit Bloom Energy, LLC, Osborn Wind Energy, LLC, Palo Duro Wind
Energy, LLC, Palo Duro Wind Interconnection Services, LLC, Peetz Logan
Interconnect, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of the NextEra MBR Sellers
(Part 2), et al.
    Filed Date: 12/7/20.
    Accession Number: 20201207-5238.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/28/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-615-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2020-12-10_SA 3588 NSP-
Walleye Wind FSA (J569) to be effective 2/9/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/10/20.
    Accession Number: 20201210-5018.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/31/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-616-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of
Interconnection Coordination Agreement No. 4531 to be effective 5/23/
2020.
    Filed Date: 12/10/20.
    Accession Number: 20201210-5073.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/31/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-617-000.
    Applicants: San Diego Gas & Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2021 TACBAA Update to be
effective 1/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/10/20.
    Accession Number: 20201210-5079.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/31/20.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-618-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.

    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: DSA ENA BESS 1, LLC
Inglewood Energy Storage SA No. 1125 WDT1602 to be effective 2/9/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/10/20.
    Accession Number: 20201210-5080.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/31/20.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 10, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-27655 Filed 12-15-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


v ao N . i v+ O U = c vi ui 0 a C4 % n . I 6 4 0 5 a >< Ln c m t! x 0 E m CD : u 41 c a) E      1  W  ~ 7 v v 0 V V ~ f= 0 ~ O V 3 J W V c 7 l. J c C ^ y O ~ ~ U _ io 0 O O rV X C Gm C~! ' t' O N Q . c .2 O ~ n .

Q c ro t U v N O s U O V GJ _

T T O " Q O O Im c U c o Q > p~ O M VI Q a ~+ L O +' c 7 ~ Q lp H Q H 0 C1 c .

l7 N C + r i G1 + r C N c W ' 0^

V V C O V 7 W n. W t Y R N 2 N 2 2 N f+

f+

c . N f6 N . Q 7 a


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 225 (Tuesday, November 23, 2010)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 71356]
[FR Doc No: 2010-29415]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

29 CFR Part 1978

[Docket No. OSHA-2008-0026]
RIN 1218-AC36

Collection of Information Requirement Related to Procedures for
the Handling of Retaliation Complaints Under the Employee Protection
Provision of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA);
Department of Labor.

ACTION: Clarification.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA is informing the public of a collection of information
requirement contained in the Procedures for the Handling of Retaliation
Complaints Under the Employee Protection Provision of the Surface
Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 interim final rule, published
August 31, 2010. This clarification notice informs the public about the
means by which to comment on this collection of information requirement
prior to OSHA's submission of an information collection request (ICR)
extension to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Comments on the collection of information requirement in the
interim final rule must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) to
the ICR docket, Docket No. OSHA-2010-0049, by December 27, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nilgun Tolek, Director, Office of the
Whistleblower Protection Program, Occupational Safety and Health
Administration, U.S. Department of Labor, Room N-3610, 200 Constitution
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. This is
not a toll-free number. The alternative formats available are large
print, electronic file on computer disk (Word Perfect, ASCII, Mates
with Duxbury Braille System) and audiotape.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 31, 2010, OSHA published notice of
an interim final rule containing updated procedures for the handling of
retaliation complaints under the employee protection provision of the
Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA) (75 FR 53544).
    In the August 31, 2010 notice, OSHA indicated that the interim
final rule did not contain collection of information requirements
subject to review by OMB under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-13) (PRA). (75 FR at 53552) However,
upon reconsideration, OSHA has determined that there is a collection of
information requirement associated with the initiation of STAA
whistleblower complaints.
    OSHA currently has OMB approval for collection of information
requirements related to the handling of retaliation complaints filed
under various whistleblower protection statutes in the ``Regulations
Containing Procedures for Handling of Retaliation Complaints'' ICR, OMB
Control Number 1218-0236. OSHA is currently requesting that OMB extend
approval of this ICR and has included in its extension request the
collection of information requirement contained in the updated STAA
whistleblower procedures. As a result of including the collection of
information requirement contained in the updated STAA whistleblower
procedures in this ICR, the burden hours in the ICR will increase by
305.
    The Federal Register notice soliciting public comment on the
extension of the ``Regulations Containing Procedures for Handling of
Retaliation Complaints'' ICR is in Docket No. OSHA-2010-0049. Comments
on the requested extension of this ICR may be submitted to Docket No.
OSHA-2010-0049 electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, the
Federal eRulemaking Portal, or by facsimile, mail, hand delivery,
express mail, messenger or courier service to the OSHA Docket office,
as indicated in the related Federal Register notice.

List of Subjects in 29 CFR Part 1978

    Administrative practice and procedure, Employment, Highway safety,
Investigations, Motor carriers, Motor vehicle safety, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Safety, Transportation, Whistleblowing.

Authority and Signature

    U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington,
DC 20210, under the following authorities: 49 U.S.C. 31101 and 31105,
Secretary of Labor's Order 4-2010, 75 FR 55355 (Sept. 10, 2010).

    Signed in Washington, DC, on November 17, 2010.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2010-29415 Filed 11-22-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register: March 17, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 51)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 12677]
[DOCID:fr17mr10-11]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0142; Airspace Docket No. 09-AAL-2]

Establishment of Class E Airspace; Shaktoolik, AK

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action establishes Class E airspace at Shaktoolik, AK, to
accommodate new Area Navigation (RNAV) Standard Instrument Approach
Procedures (SIAPs), and one Obstacle Departure Procedure (ODP) at
Shaktoolik Airport. The FAA is taking this action to enhance safety and
management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at Shaktoolik
Airport.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, June 3, 2010. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under title 1,
Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual revision of
FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary Rolf, AAL-538G, Federal Aviation
Administration, 222 West 7th Avenue, Box 14, Anchorage, AK 99513-7587;
telephone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet address: http://www.faa.gov/about/
office_org/headquarters_offices/ato/service_units/systemops/fs/
alaskan/rulemaking/.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

History

    On Wednesday, December 16, 2009, the FAA published a notice of
proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register to establish Class E
airspace at Shaktoolik, AK (74 FR 66593).
    Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking
proceeding by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA.
No comments were received. The rule is adopted as proposed.
    The Class E airspace areas designated as 700/1,200 ft. transition
areas are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.9T, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, signed August 27, 2009, and
effective September 15, 2009, which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the Order.

The Rule

    This action amends Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by establishing Class E airspace at Shaktoolik Airport, AK, to
accommodate new RNAV SIAPs, and an ODP at Shaktoolik Airport. This
Class E airspace will provide adequate controlled airspace upward from
700 and 1,200 feet above the surface, for safety and management of IFR
operations at Shaktoolik Airport.
    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Because this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart 1, Section 40103, Sovereignty and use of
airspace. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing
regulations to ensure the safe and efficient use of the navigable
airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it creates Class E airspace sufficient in size to contain aircraft
executing instrument procedures for the Shaktoolik Airport and
represents the FAA's continuing effort to safely and efficiently use
the navigable airspace.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

0
In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, CLASS B, CLASS C, CLASS D, AND
CLASS E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854,
24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9T, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, signed August 27, 2009, and effective September 15, 2009, is
amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Extending Upward From 700 Feet or
More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

AAL AK E5 Shaktoolik, AK [New]

Shaktoolik Airport, AK
    (Lat. 64[deg]22'16'' N., long. 161[deg]13'26'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.4-mile radius of the Shaktoolik Airport, AK; and that
airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface within a
73-mile radius of the Shaktoolik Airport, AK.
* * * * *

    Issued in Anchorage, AK, on February 19, 2010.
Anthony M. Wylie,
Manager, Alaska Flight Services Information Area Group.
[FR Doc. 2010-5267 Filed 3-16-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


1 November 30, 1995 EPA SAB CASAC LTR 96 002 Honorable Carol M. Browner Administrator U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 401 M Street, S. W. Washington, DC 20460 RE: CASAC Closure on the Primary Standard Portion of the Staff Paper for Ozone Dear Ms. Browner:

A Panel of the Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee ( CASAC) of EPA's Science Advisory Board ( SAB) met on March 22, 1995, to review a draft of the primary standard part of the document entitled Review of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone Assessment of Scientific and Technical Information OAQPS Staff Paper. At that time, a draft of the secondary standard portion of the document was not completed. At the March meeting, the Panel made extensive recommendations for strengthening the document. In August 1995, a revised Staff Paper, which included a first draft of the secondary standard portion was sent to CASAC panel members for review. On September 19 and 20, 1995, the Panel met to compete this review. The Panel members' comments reflect their satisfaction with the improvements made in the scientific quality and completeness of the primary standard portion of the Staff Paper. The changes made in that portion of the document are consistent with CASAC's recommendations. However, the Panel Members provided additional comments to your staff at the meeting and subsequently in writing. Although the Panel would like to have these comments considered for incorporation in the Staff Paper, the Panel did not feel that it was necessary to review another revised version and came to closure on the primary standard portion. It was the consensus of the Panel that although our understanding of the health effects of ozone is far from complete, the document provides an adequate scientific basis for making regulatory decisions concerning a primary ozone standard.

The Panel could not come to closure, however, on the secondary standard 2 portion of the Staff Paper which was a first draft. To facilitate further development of this part of the Staff Paper, the Panel members have provided detailed comments to your staff. The Panel felt that the suggested revisions were extensive enough to warrant a review of the next draft.

I would like to summarize for you the Panel's recommendations concerning the primary standard. It was the consensus of the Panel that EPA's selection of ozone as the surrogate for controlling photochemical oxidants is correct. It was also the consensus of the Panel that an 8 hour standard was more appropriate for a human health based standard than a 1 hour standard. The Panel was in unanimous agreement that the present 1 hour standard be eliminated and replaced with an 8 hour standard.

The Panel felt that the weight of the health effects evidence indicates that there is no threshold concentration for the onset of biological responses due to exposure to ozone above background concentrations. Based on information now available, it appears that ozone may elicit a continuum of biological responses down to background concentrations. This means that the paradigm of selecting a standard at the lowestobservable effects level and then providing an " adequate margin of safety" is no longer possible. It further means that EPA's risk assessments must play a central role in identifying an appropriate level.

To conduct the risk assessments, the Agency had to identify the population at risk and the physiological responses of concern, develop a model to estimate the exposure of this population to ozone, and develop a model to estimate the probability of an adverse physiological response to the exposure. The Panel agrees with EPA that the selection of " outdoor children" and " outdoor workers," particularly those with preexisting respiratory disease are the appropriate populations with the highest risks. After considerable debate, it was the consensus of the Panel that the Agency's criteria for the determination of an adverse physiological response was reasonable. Nevertheless, there was considerable concern that the criteria for grading physiological and clinical responses to ozone was confusing if not misleading. The Panel concurs, with the Agency that the models selected to estimate exposure and risk are appropriate models. However, because of the myriad of assumptions that are made to estimate population exposure and risk, large uncertainties exist in these estimates.

The results of two of the risk analyses are presented in Tables VI 1 and VI 2 in the Staff Paper and are reproduced in the attached tables. The ranges of the risk estimates across nine cities for outdoor children are presented in Table VI 1. Because of the large number of stochastic variables used in the exposure models, the exposure 3 estimates vary from run to run. However, the ranges are not reflective of all of the uncertainties associated with the numerous assumptions that were made to develop the estimates.

The single estimates presented in Table VI 2 do not reflect any of the uncertainties associated with these estimates. ( Table VI 2 contains only the estimated hospital admissions due to asthma which account for over 85% of the estimated total hospital admissions due to ozone exposure). These uncertainties need to be explicitly articulated in order to put the estimates in proper perspective. Nevertheless, based on the results presented in these and other similar tables presented in the Staff Paper, the Panel concluded that there is no " bright line" which distinguishes any of the proposed standards ( either the level or the number of allowable exceedences) as being significantly more protective of public health. For example, the differences in the percent of outdoor children ( Table VI 1) responding between the present standard and the most stringent proposal ( 8H1EX at 0.07 ppm) are small and their ranges overlap for all health endpoints. In Table VI 2, the estimates in row 1, which appeared in the draft Staff Paper, suggest considerable differences between the several options. However, when ozone aggravated asthma admissions are compared to total asthma admissions ( rows 5 and 6), the differences between the various options are small. Consequently, the selection of a specific level and number of allowable exceedences is a policy judgment. Although it was the consensus of the Panel that the ranges of concentrations and allowable exceedences proposed by the Agency were appropriate, a number of Panel members expressed " personal" preferences for the level and number of allowable exceedences. Of the ten panel members who expressed their opinions, all ten favored multiple allowable exceedences, three favored a level of 0.08 ppm, one favored the mid to upper range ( 0.08  0.09 ppm), three favored the upper range ( 0.09 ppm), one favored a 0.009  0.10 ppm range with health advisories issued when the 8 hour ozone concentration was forecasted to exceed 0.007 ppm, and two just endorsed the range presented by the Agency as appropriate and stated that the selection should be a policy decision. The members who favored the lower numbers expressed concern over the evidence for chronic deep lung inflammation from the controlled human and animal exposure studies and the observations of pain on deep inspiration in some subjects.

Because there is no apparent threshold for responses and no " bright line" in the risk assessment, a number of panel members recommended that an expanded air pollution warning system be initiated so that sensitive individuals can take appropriate " exposure avoidance" behavior. Since many areas of the country already have an infrastructure in place to designate " ozone action days" when voluntary emission 4 reduction measures are put in place, this idea may be fairly easy to implement.

It was also the consensus of the Panel that the form of the 8 hr standard be more robust than the present 1 hour standard. The present standard is based on an extreme value statistic which is significantly dependent on stochastic processes such as extreme meteorological conditions. The result is that areas which are near attainment will randomly flip in and out of compliance. A more robust, concentrationbased form will minimize the " flip flops," and provide some insulation from the impacts of extreme meteorological events. The Panel also endorses the staff recommendation for creating a " too close to call" category.

Since the last ozone NAAQS review, the scientific community has made great strides in their understanding of the health effects of ozone exposure because of ongoing research programs. Panel members were very impressed with how much more we understand now as compared to the prior round. Nevertheless, there are still many gaps in our knowledge and large uncertainties in many of the assessments. For example, there is little information available on the frequency of human activity patterns involving outdoor physical exercise. Little is also known about the possible chronic health impacts of ozone exposure over a period of many years. In addition, there is no clear understanding of the significance of the inflammatory response inferred from the broncholavage data. Panel members stated, however, that the scientific community is now in a position to frame the questions that need to be better resolved so the uncertainties can be reduced before the next ozone review in 5 years. For this reason, it is important that research efforts on the health and ecological effects of ozone not be reduced because we have come to closure on this review.

CASAC would appreciate being kept informed of progress on establishing a revised or new ozone standard, and plans for research on ozone effects. Please do not hesitate to contact me if CASAC can be of further assistance in this matter. We look forward to receiving the revisions of the secondary standard portion of the Staff Paper.

Sincerely,

Dr. George T. Wolff, Chair Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee 5 Page left blank to accomodate insert table  see meeting file or report file for a copy of this page. 6 Table VI 2 ( revised)

ESTIMATED HOSPITAL ADMISSIONS FOR ASTHMATICS IN THE NEW YORK CITY AREA 1H1EX 0.12 1H1EX 0.10 8H1EX 0.10 8H1EX 0.09 8H1EX 0.08 8H1EX 0.07 8H5EX 0.09 8H5EX 0.08 AS IS Excess Admissionsa 210 130 240 180 110 60 180 120 = 385d % ^ from present std 0%  38% + 14%  14%  48%  71%  14%  42% + 83%

Excess + backgroundb 890 810 920 860 790 740 860 800 1065e % ^ from present std 0%  9% + 3%  3%  11%  17%  3%  10% + 20%

All asthma admissionsc 28,295 28,215 28,325 28,265 28,195 28,145 28,265 28,205 28,470f % ^ from present std 0%  0.3% + 0.1%  0.1%  0.4%  0.5%  0.1%  0.3% + 0.6%

a  excess asthma admissions attributed to ozone levels exceeding a background concentration of 0.04 ppm; from Table VI 2, page 155 in the August 1995 OAQPS Draft Staff Paper b  asthma admissions included in ( a) plus those due to background ozone concentrations; admissions due to background = 1065e  385d = 680 c  asthma admissions due to all causes = 28,470f  385d  Excess Admissions from row 1 d  estimated from Figure V 15, page 125 in the August 1995 OAQPS Draft Staff Paper e  from page 127, line 13 in the August 1995 OAQPS Draft Staff Paper f  total admissions from asthma = total asthmatics ( 365,000  from page 126, line 24) x hospitalization rate ( 78/ 1000 asthmatics  from page 126,

line 29) 7 i SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD CLEAN AIR SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE OZONE PANEL ROSTER Chair Dr. George T. Wolff, General Motors Environmental & Energy Staff, Detroit, MI Members Dr. Stephen M. Ayres, Office of International Health Programs, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA Dr. Jay S. Jacobson, Boyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY Dr. Joe L. Mauderly, Inhalation Toxicology Research Institute, Lovelace Biomedical & Environmental Research Institute, Albuquerque, NM Dr. Paulette Middleton, Science & Policy Associates, Inc., Boulder, CO ( did not participate)

Dr. James H. Price, Jr., Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, Austin, TX Consultants to CASAC Dr. Stephen D. Colome, Integrated Environmental Services, University Tower, Irvine, CA Dr. A. Myrick Freeman, Department of Economics, Bowdoin College,, Brunswick, ME Dr. Allan Legge, Biosphere Solutions, Calgary, Alberta, CANADA Dr. Morton Lippmann, Institute of Environmental Medicine, New York University Medical Center, Tuxedo, NY Dr. William Manning, Department of Plant Pathology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA Dr. Roger O. McClellan, Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, NC Dr. D. Warner North, Decision Focus, Inc., Mountain View, CA Dr. Frank E. Speizer, Harvard Medical School, Channing Lab, Boston, MA Dr. George Taylor, Biological Services Center, Desert Research Institute, University of Nevada, Reno, NV Dr. Mark J. Utell, Pulmonary Disease Unit, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY Science Advisory Board Staff Mr. A. Robert Flaak, Designated Federal Official, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science Advisory Board ( 1400F), 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460 ii Ms. Connie Valentine, Staff Secretary, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Science Advisory Board ( 1400F), 401 M Street, SW, Washington, DC 20460 NOTICE This report has been written as part of the activities of the Science Advisory Board, a public advisory group providing extramural scientific information and advice to the Administrator and other officials of the Environmental Protection Agency. The Board is structured to provide balanced, expert assessment of scientific matters related to problems facing the Agency. This report has not been reviewed for approval by the Agency and, hence, the contents of this report do not necessarily represent the views and policies of the Environmental Protection Agency, nor of other agencies in the Executive Branch of the Federal government, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute a recommendation for use. DISTRIBUTION LIST Administrator Deputy Administrator Assistant Administrators Director, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, OAR Director, Office of Science Policy, ORD EPA Regional Administrators EPA Laboratory Directors EPA Headquarters Library EPA Regional Libraries EPA Laboratory Libraries Library of Congress National Technical Information Service C:\ dmautop\ temp\ DCTM_ ARP. wpd


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 121 (Monday, June 24, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29378]
[FR Doc No: 2019-13384]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0489]

Recurring Safety Zone; EQT 4th of July Celebration, Pittsburgh,
PA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone for the EQT 4th
of July Fireworks to provide for the safety of persons, vessels, and
the marine environment on the navigable waters of the Allegheny, Ohio,
and Monongahela River during this event. Our regulation for the marine
events within the Eighth Coast Guard District identifies the regulated
area for the event in Pittsburgh, PA. During the enforcement periods,
entry into this zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh or a designated representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.801, Table 1, Line 47, will be
enforced on July 4, 2019 from 9 p.m. to 10:40 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email Petty Officer Charles Morris,
Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 412-670-
4288, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce a safety zone
for the EQT 4th of July Celebration in 33 CFR 165.801, Table 1, Line
47, on July 4, 2019 from 9 p.m. to 10:40 p.m. This action is being
taken to provide for the safety of persons, vessels, and the marine
environment on the navigable waters of the Ohio River during this
event. Our regulation for marine events within the Eighth Coast Guard
District, Sec.  165.801 specifies the location of the regulated area
for the EQT 4th of July Celebration. Entry into the regulated area is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Marine Safety
Unit Pittsburgh (COTP) or a designated representative. Persons or
vessels desiring to enter into or pass through the regulated area must
request permission from the COTP or a designated representative. They
can be reached on VHF FM channel 16. If permission is granted, all
persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the COTP or
designated representative.
    In addition to this notice of enforcement in the Federal Register,
the COTP or a designated representative will inform the public through
Broadcast Notices to Mariners (BNMs), Local Notices to Mariners (LNMs),
Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs), and/or through other means
of public notice as appropriate at least 24 hours in advance of each
enforcement.

    Dated: June 19, 2019.
S. Miros,
Lieutenant Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Marine
Safety Unit Pittsburgh, Acting.
[FR Doc. 2019-13384 Filed 6-21-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: October 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 207)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63377-63378]
[DOCID:fr24oc08-14]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 105

[Docket Nos. TSA-2006-24191; USCG-2006-24196]

Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC)
Implementation in the Maritime Sector; Hazardous Materials Endorsement
for a Commercial Driver's License

AGENCY: United States Coast Guard; DHS.

ACTION: Notice of compliance date, Captain of the Port Zones Guam,
Houston-Galveston, Los Angeles-Long Beach, and San Juan.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document informs owners and operators of facilities
located within Captain of the Port Zones Guam, Houston-Galveston, Los
Angeles-Long Beach, and San Juan that they must implement access
control procedures utilizing TWIC no later than April 14, 2009.

DATES: The compliance date for the TWIC regulations found in 33 CFR
part 105 for Captain of the Port Zones Guam, Houston-Galveston, Los
Angeles-Long Beach, and San Juan is April 14, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this document as being available in the docket,
are part of dockets TSA-2006-24191 and USCG-2006-24196, and are
available for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. You
may also find this docket on the Internet at www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
document, call LCDR Jonathan Maiorine, telephone 1-877-687-2243. If you
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V.

Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Regulatory History

    On May 22, 2006, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) through
the United States Coast Guard (Coast Guard) and the Transportation
Security Administration (TSA) published a joint notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled ``Transportation Worker Identification Credential
(TWIC) Implementation in the Maritime Sector; Hazardous Materials
Endorsement for a Commercial Driver's License'' in the Federal Register
(71 FR 29396). This was followed by a 45-day comment period and four
public meetings. The Coast Guard and TSA issued a joint final rule,
under the same title, on January 25, 2007 (72 FR 3492) (hereinafter
referred to as the original TWIC final rule). The preamble to that
final rule contains a discussion of all the comments received on the
NPRM, as well as a discussion of the provisions found in the original
TWIC final rule, which became effective on March 26, 2007.
    On May 7, 2008, the Coast Guard and TSA issued a final rule to
realign the compliance date for implementation of the Transportation
Worker Identification Credential. 73 FR 25562. The date by which
mariners need to obtain a TWIC, and by which owners and operators of
vessels and outer continental shelf facilities must implement access
control procedures utilizing TWIC, is now April 15, 2009 instead of
September 25, 2008. Owners and operators of facilities that must comply
with 33 CFR part 105 will still be subject to earlier, rolling
compliance dates, as set forth in 33 CFR 105.115(e). The Coast Guard
announced the rolling compliance dates, as provided in 33 CFR
105.115(e), at least 90 days in advance via notices published in the
Federal Register. The final compliance date for all COTP Zones will not
be later than April 15, 2009.

II. Notice of Facility Compliance Date--COTP Zones Guam, Houston-
Galveston, Los Angeles-Long Beach, and San Juan.

    Title 33 CFR 105.115(e) currently states that ``[f]acility owners
and operators must be operating in accordance with the TWIC provisions
in this part by the date set by the Coast Guard in a Notice to be
published in the Federal Register.'' Through this Notice, the Coast
Guard informs the owners and operators of facilities subject to 33 CFR
105.115(e) located within COTP Zones Guam, Houston-Galveston, Los
Angeles-Long Beach, and San Juan that the deadline for their compliance
with Coast Guard and TSA TWIC requirements is April 14, 2009.
    The TSA and Coast Guard have determined that this date provides
sufficient time for the estimated population required to obtain TWICs
for these COTP Zones to enroll and for TSA to complete the necessary
security threat assessments for those enrollment applications. We
strongly encourage persons requiring unescorted access to facilities
regulated by 33 CFR part 105 and located in one of these COTP Zones to
enroll for their TWIC as soon as possible, if they haven't already.
Additionally, we note that the TWIC Final Rule advises owners and
operators of MTSA regulated facilities of their responsibility to
notify employees of the TWIC requirements. Specifically, 33 CFR
105.200(b)(14) requires owners or operators of MTSA regulated
facilities to ``[i]nform facility personnel of their responsibility to
apply for and maintain a TWIC, including the deadlines and methods for
such applications.'' Information on enrollment procedures, as well as a
link to the pre-enrollment Web site (which will also enable an
applicant to make an appointment for enrollment), may be found at
https://twicprogram.tsa.dhs.gov/ TWICWebApp/.
    You may visit our Web site at homeport.uscg.mil/twic for a listing
of all compliance dates by COTP Zone. This list is subject to change;
any changes in compliance dates will appear on that Web site and be
announced in the Federal Register at least 90 days in advance.

    Dated: October 16, 2008.
Mark P. O'Malley,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Chief, Ports and Facilities Activities.
 [FR Doc. E8-25434 Filed 10-23-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P