[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 53 (Tuesday, March 21, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 14499]
[FR Doc No: 2017-05377]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R06-OAR-2011-0695; FRL-9957-42-Region 6]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico;
Albuquerque/Bernalillo County; Inspection and Maintenance Program Error
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve an error
correction to a previously approved diesel inspection and maintenance
(I/M) program provision in Albuquerque/Bernalillo County's State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This action is based on our determination
that at the time EPA approved the diesel I/M Program the State did not
have the legal authority to expand its program to require the testing
of 1998 and newer diesel motor vehicles greater than 1,000 and less
than 10,001 pounds.

DATES: Written comments should be received on or before April 20, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by EPA-R06-OAR-2011-0695,
at http://www.regulations.gov or via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For
additional information on how to submit comments see the detailed
instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the direct final rule located
in the rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. John Walser,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the final rules section of this Federal
Register, the EPA is approving the State's SIP submittal as a direct
rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as
noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A
detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final
rule. If no relevant adverse comments are received in response to this
action no further activity is contemplated. If the EPA receives
relevant adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and
all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final
rule based on this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second
comment period. Any parties interested in commenting on this action
should do so at this time.
    For additional information, see the direct final rule which is
located in the rules section of this Federal Register.

    Dated: March 13, 2017.
Samuel Coleman,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2017-05377 Filed 3-20-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17337-17339]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06410]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2011-0059]

Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories;
Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of
Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OSHA solicits public comments concerning the proposal to
extend the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) approval of the
information collection requirements specified in the Occupational
Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories.

DATES: Comments must be submitted (postmarked, sent, or received) by
May 27, 2022.

ADDRESSES:
    Electronically: You may submit comments and attachments
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal. Follow the instructions online for submitting
comments.
    Docket: To read or download comments or other material in the
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov. Documents in the docket are
listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index; however, some
information (e.g., copyrighted material) is not publicly available to
read or download through the website. All submissions, including
copyrighted material, are available for inspection through the OSHA
Docket Office. Contact the OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY
(877) 889-5627) for assistance in locating docket submissions.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and OSHA
docket number (OSHA-2011-0059) for the Information Collection Request
(ICR). OSHA will place all comments, including any personal
information, in the public docket, which may be made available online.
Therefore, OSHA

cautions interested parties about submitting personal information such
as social security numbers and birthdates. For further information on
submitting comments, see the ``Public Participation'' heading in the
section of this notice titled SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seleda Perryman or Theda Kenney,
Directorate of Standards and Guidance, OSHA, U.S. Department of Labor;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Department of Labor, as part of the continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent (i.e., employer) burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to provide the public with an
opportunity to comment on proposed and continuing information
collection requirements in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)). This program ensures that
information is in the desired format, reporting burden (time and costs)
is minimal, the collection instruments are clearly understood, and
OSHA's estimate of the information collection burden is accurate. The
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (OSH Act) (29 U.S.C. 651 et
seq.) authorizes information collection by employers as necessary or
appropriate for enforcement of the OSH Act or for developing
information regarding the causes and prevention of occupational
injuries, illnesses, and accidents (29 U.S.C. 657). The OSH Act also
requires that OSHA obtain such information with minimum burden upon
employers, especially those operating small businesses, and to reduce
to the maximum extent feasible unnecessary duplication of effort in
obtaining information (29 U.S.C. 657).
    The following sections describe who uses the information collected
under each requirement, as well as how they use it. The purpose of
these requirements is to reduce employees' risk of death or serious
injury by ensuring that employment has been tested and is in safe
operating condition.
    The Standard entitled ``Occupational Exposure to Hazardous
Chemicals in Laboratories'' (29 CFR 1910.1450; the ``Standard'')
applies to laboratories that use hazardous chemicals in accord with the
Standard's definitions for ``laboratory use of hazardous chemicals''
and ``laboratory scale.'' The Standard requires these laboratories to
maintain worker exposures at or below the permissible exposure limits
specified for the hazardous chemicals in 29 CFR part 1910, subpart Z.
The laboratories do so by developing a written Chemical Hygiene Plan
(CHP) that describes the following: Standard operating procedures for
using hazardous chemicals; hazard-control techniques; equipment-
reliability measures; worker information and training programs;
conditions under which the employer must approve operations,
procedures, and activities before implementation; and medical
consultations and examinations. The CHP also designates personnel
responsible for implementing the CHP and specifies the procedures to be
used to provide additional protection to workers exposed to
particularly hazardous chemicals.
    Other information collection requirements of the Standard include:
Documenting exposure monitoring results; notifying workers in writing
of these results; presenting specified information and training to
workers; establishing a medical surveillance program for overexposed
workers; providing required information to the physician; obtaining the
physician's written opinion on using proper respiratory equipment; and
establishing, maintaining, transferring, and disclosing exposure
monitoring and medical records. These collection of information
requirements, including the CHP, control worker overexposure to
hazardous laboratory chemicals, thereby preventing serious illnesses
and death among workers exposed to such chemicals.

II. Special Issues for Comment

    OSHA has a particular interest in comments on the following issues:
     Whether the proposed information collection requirements
are necessary for the proper performance of the agency's functions to
protect workers, including whether the information is useful;
     The accuracy of OSHA's estimate of the burden (time and
costs) of the information collection requirements, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used;
     The quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and
     Ways to minimize the burden on employers who must comply;
for example, by using automated or other technological information
collection, and transmission techniques.

III. Proposed Actions

    OSHA is requesting an adjustment increase in the existing burden
hour estimate for the collection of information requirements in the
Standard. The agency is requesting to increase the current burden hour
estimate from 695,105 to 832,036 hours for a total increase of 136,931
hours. The increase is due to an increase in the worker and
establishment estimates for this ICR. Additionally, the capital cost
estimate increased from $79,770,481 to $94,198,596 for a total increase
of $14,428,115. This increase is a result of an increase in the number
of workers requiring medical consultations and medical examinations.
    OSHA will summarize the comments submitted in response to this
notice and will include this summary in the request to OMB to extend
the approval of the information collection requirements.
    Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection.
    Title: Occupational Exposure to Hazardous Chemicals in Laboratories
(29 CFR 1910.1450).
    OMB Control Number: 1218-0131.
    Affected Public: Business or other for-profits.
    Number of Respondents: 169,188.
    Number of Responses: 2,026,410.
    Frequency of Responses: On occasion.
    Average Time per Response: Varies from 3 minutes to 1 hour.
    Estimated Total Burden Hours: 832,036.
    Estimated Cost (Operation and Maintenance): $94,198,596.

IV. Public Participation--Submission of Comments on This Notice and
Internet Access to Comments and Submissions

    You may submit comments in response to this document as follows:
(1) Electronically at http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal
eRulemaking Portal; (2) by facsimile (fax); or (3) by hard copy. Please
note: While OSHA's Docket Office is continuing to accept and process
submissions by regular mail due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Docket
Office is closed to the public and not able to receive submissions to
the docket by hand, express mail, messenger, and courier service. All
comments, attachments, and other material must identify the agency name
and the OSHA docket number for the ICR (Docket No. OSHA-2011-0059). You
may supplement electronic submissions by uploading document files
electronically. If you wish to mail additional materials in reference
to an electronic or a facsimile submission, you must submit them to the
OSHA Docket Office (see the section of this notice titled ADDRESSES).
The additional materials must clearly identify your electronic comments
by your name, date, and the docket number so that the

agency can attach them to your comments.
    Due to security procedures, the use of regular mail may cause a
significant delay in the receipt of comments.
    Comments and submissions are posted without change at http://www.regulations.gov. Therefore, OSHA cautions commenters about
submitting personal information such as social security numbers and
dates of birth. Although all submissions are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index, some information (e.g., copyrighted
material) is not publicly available to read or download from this
website. All submissions, including copyrighted material, are available
for inspection and copying at the OSHA Docket Office. Information on
using the http://www.regulations.gov website to submit comments and
access the docket is available at the website's ``User Tips'' link.
Contact the OSHA Docket Office at<PHONE_NUMBER>, (TTY<PHONE_NUMBER>)
for information about materials not available from the website, and for
assistance in using the internet to locate docket submissions.

V. Authority and Signature

    James S. Frederick, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this notice. The
authority for this notice is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR
3912).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on March 21, 2022.
James S. Frederick,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2022-06410 Filed 3-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 182 (Thursday, September 21, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 44188-44189]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20106]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2017-N-0001]

Drug Development in Pediatric Heart Failure: Extrapolation,
Clinical Trial Design, and Endpoints; Public Workshop

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice of public workshop.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
following public workshop entitled ``FDA-University of Maryland CERSI
Drug Development in Pediatric Heart Failure: Extrapolation, Clinical
Trial Design, and Endpoints.'' The purpose of the public workshop is to
address challenges related to the evaluation of products in pediatric
heart failure including population to study, endpoints, and
extrapolation of adult efficacy data. The workshop will also provide a
forum for discussion on the use of registry data, as well as
alternative trial designs and statistical methods.

DATES: The public workshop will be held on Friday, October 27, 2017,
from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The public workshop will be held at FDA's White Oak Campus,
10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31, Rm. 1503A, Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Entrance for the public workshop participants (non-FDA employees)
is through Building 1, where routine security check procedures will be
performed. For parking and security information, please refer to
https://www.fda.gov/AboutFDA/WorkingatFDA/BuildingsandFacilities/WhiteOakCampusInformation/ucm241740.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacquline Yancy, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 22, Rm. 6319, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-
796-7068<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The purpose of this public workshop is to provide an opportunity
for relevant stakeholders, including clinicians, academia, industry,
and FDA, to discuss alternative trial designs for product development
in pediatric heart failure.

II. Topics for Discussion at the Public Workshop

    Specifically, the workshop will include application of pediatric
extrapolation in drug development for pediatric heart failure and a
discussion of alternative approaches to establishing effectiveness in
pediatric heart failure, including the use of Bayesian approaches.
Cases will be presented to exemplify various approaches.
    The agenda is located at http://www.cersi.umd.edu/events/index.php?mode=4&id=12500.

III. Participating in the Public Workshop

    Registration: To register for the public workshop, visit the
following Web site: http://www.cersi.umd.edu/events/index.php?mode=4&id=12500. Registrants will receive confirmation when
they have been accepted. There will be no onsite registration.
    There is a registration fee to attend this public workshop in
person. Seats are limited and registration will be on a first-come,
first-served basis. The cost to attend in person is as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Category                               Cost
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry Representative......................................        $50
Nonprofit Organization and Academic Other Than University of          50
 Maryland....................................................
University of Maryland, College Park and Baltimore...........          0
Federal Government...........................................          0
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If you need special accommodations due to a disability, please
contact Jacquline Yancy (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT) at least
7 days in advance.
    Streaming Webcast of the Public Workshop: This public workshop will
also be webcast. There is no registration fee for attending the
workshop via the webcast, but registration is still required.
Information regarding access to the webcast link is available at http://www.cersi.umd.edu/events/index.php?mode=4&id=12500.
    If you have never attended a Connect Pro event before, test your
connection at https://collaboration.fda.gov/common/help/en/support/meeting_test.htm. To get a quick overview of the Connect Pro program,
visit https://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_overview. FDA has verified
the Web site addresses in this document, as of the date this document
publishes in the Federal Register, but Web sites are subject to change
over time.
    Transcripts: Please be advised that as soon as a transcript of the
public workshop is available, it will be accessible at https://www.regulations.gov. It may be viewed at the Dockets Management Staff
Office (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

    Dated: September 15, 2017.
Anna K. Abram,
Deputy Commissioner for Policy, Planning, Legislation, and Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2017-20106 Filed 9-20-17; 8:45 a.m.]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 14, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 34606-34608]
[FR Doc No: 2011-14624]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0235]
RIN 1625-AA08

Special Local Regulation; Monongahela River, Morgantown, WV

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation from mile marker 101.0 (Morgantown Highway Bridge) to mile
marker 102.0 (Morgantown Lock and Dam) on the Monongahela River,
extending the entire width of the river. The special local regulation
is being established to safeguard participants of the Mountaineer
Triathlon from the hazards of marine traffic. Entry into, movement
within, and departure from this Coast Guard regulated area is
prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or a designated
representative.

DATES: This proposed rule is effective from 5:45 a.m. until 10 a.m. on
June 26, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2011-0235 and are available online
by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0235 in the
``Keyword'' box, and then clicking ``Search.'' They are also available
for inspection or copying at the Docket Management Facility (M-30),
U.S. Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail ENS Robyn Hoskins, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh,
Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> Ext. 2140, e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
Publishing a NPRM would be impracticable with respect to this rule
based on the short notice given the Coast Guard for this event.
Immediate action is needed to safeguard participants during the
Mountaineer Triathlon marine event from the hazards imposed by marine
traffic.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Publishing an NPRM and delaying
its effective date would be impracticable based on the short notice
received for the event. Immediate action is needed to provide safety
and protection during the Mountaineer Triathlon marine event that will
occur in the city of Morgantown, WV.

Basis and Purpose

    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary special local
regulation from mile marker 101.0 (Morgantown Highway Bridge) to mile
marker 102.0 (Morgantown Lock and Dam) on the Monongahela River,
extending the entire width of the river. The special local regulation
is being established to safeguard participants of the Mountaineer
Triathlon from the hazards of marine traffic.

Discussion of Rule

    The Captain of the Port Pittsburgh is establishing a temporary
special local regulation from mile marker 101.0 (Morgantown Highway
Bridge) to mile marker 102.0 (Morgantown Lock and Dam) on the
Monongahela River, extending the entire width of the river. The special
local regulation is being established to safeguard participants of the
Mountaineer Triathlon from the hazards of marine traffic that will
occur in the city of Morgantown, WV. Persons or vessels shall not enter
into, depart from, or move within the regulated area without permission
from the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or his authorized
representative. They may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 13 or 16, or
through Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley at 1-800-253-7465. This rule is
effective from 5:45 a.m. to 10 a.m. on June 26, 2011. The Captain of
the Port Pittsburgh will inform the public

through broadcast notices to mariners of the enforcement period for the
special local regulation as well as any changes in the planned
schedule.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, as
supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Executive Order 12866
or under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management
and Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. This rule will only
be in effect for less than one day and notifications to the marine
community will be made through broadcast notice to mariners. The
impacts on routine navigation are expected to be minimal.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be
small entities: the owners or operators of vessels intending to transit
that portion of the waterways from mile marker 101.0 (Morgantown
Highway Bridge) to mile marker 102.0 (Morgantown Lock and Dam) on the
Monongahela River, from 5:45 a.m. to 10 a.m. on June 26, 2011. The
special local regulation will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities because this rule will only be
in effect for less than one day.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not cause a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management

systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This
rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph (34)(h), of
the Instruction. This rule involves establishing a special local
regulation, requiring a permit wherein an analysis of the environmental
impact of the regulations was performed. Under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(h.), of the Instruction, an environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are not required for this rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 100

    Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 100 as follows:

PART 100--SAFETY OF LIFE ON NAVIGABLE WATERS

0
1. The authority citation for part 100 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1233.

0
2. Add Sec.  100.T08-0235 to read as follows:

Sec.  100.T08-0235  Special Local Regulation; Monongahela River,
Morgantown, WV.

    (a) Location. The following area is a regulated area: All waters of
the Monongahela River, from surface to bottom, from mile marker 101.0
(Morgantown Highway Bridge) to mile marker 102.0 (Morgantown Lock and
Dam) on the Monongahela River, extending the entire width of the river.
These markings are based on the USACE's Monongahela River Navigation
Charts (Chart 1, January 2004) using North American Datum of 1983 (NAD
1983).
    (b) Periods of enforcement. This rule will only be enforced from
5:45 a.m. through 10 a.m. on June 26, 2011. The Captain of the Port
Pittsburgh or a designated representative will inform the public
through broadcast notices to mariners of the enforcement period for the
regulated area as well as any changes in the planned schedule.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  100.35 of this part, entry into this regulated area is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh.
    (2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into, departure from, or
passage through a regulated area must request permission from the
Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a designated representative. They may
be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 13 or 16, or through Coast Guard Sector
Ohio Valley at 1-800-253-7465.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh and designated on-scene U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel. On-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel
includes Commissioned, Warrant, and Petty Officers of the U.S. Coast
Guard.

    Dated: May 9, 2011.
R.V. Timme,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2011-14624 Filed 6-13-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 133 (Thursday, July 13, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32409-32413]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14664]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81095; File No. SR-ISE-2017-62]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Establish Ports
and Gateways That Members Use To Connect to the Exchange

July 7, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 23, 2017, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to: (1) Establish ports and gateways that
members use to connect to the Exchange with the migration of the
Exchange's trading system to the Nasdaq INET architecture, and (2)
amend the Schedule of Fees to adopt fees for those ports and gateways.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at www.ise.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to: (1) Establish ports
and gateways that members use to connect to the Exchange with the
migration of the Exchange's trading system to the Nasdaq INET
architecture,\3\ and (2) amend the Schedule of Fees to adopt fees for
those ports and gateways. In particular, the Exchange proposes to
establish and adopt fees for the following connectivity options that
are available in connection with the re-platform of the Exchange's
trading system: Specialized Quote Feed (``SQF''), SQF Purge, Dedicated
SQF Host, Ouch to Trade Options (``OTTO''), Clearing Trade Interface
(``CTI''), Financial Information eXchange (``FIX''), FIX Drop, Disaster
Recovery, and Market Data. These port and gateway options, which are
described in more detail below, are the same as those currently used to
connect to the Exchange's affiliates, including Nasdaq GEMX, LLC
(``GEMX''), Nasdaq Phlx LLC (``Phlx''), The Nasdaq Options Market LLC
(``NOM''), and Nasdaq BX (``BX'').\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80432 (April 11,
2017), 82 FR 18191 (April 17, 2017) (SR-ISE-2017-03).
    \4\ See GEMX Schedule of Fees, IV. Access Services, Port Fees,
4. Ports; Phlx Pricing Schedule, VII. Other Member Fees, B. Port
Fees; NOM Rules, Chapter XV Options Pricing, Sec. 3 NOM--Ports and
other Services; BX Rules, Chapter XV Options Pricing, Sec. 3 BX--
Ports and other Services.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    1. Specialized Quote Feed Port.
    SQF is an interface that allows market makers to connect and send
quotes, sweeps and auction responses into the Exchange. Data includes
the following: (1) Options Auction Notifications (e.g., opening
imbalance, Flash, PIM, Solicitation and Facilitation or other
information); (2) Options Symbol Directory Messages; (3) System Event
Messages (e.g., start of messages, start of system hours, start of
quoting, start of opening); (4) Option Trading Action Messages (e.g.,
halts, resumes); (5) Execution Messages; (6) Quote Messages (quote/
sweep messages, risk protection triggers or purge notifications).
    2. SQF Purge Port.
    SQF Purge is a specific port for the SQF interface that only
receives and notifies of purge requests from the market maker.
Dedicated SQF Purge Ports enable market makers to seamlessly manage
their ability to remove their quotes in a swift manner.
    3. Dedicated SQF Host.
    The Exchange will also offer dedicated gateways to facilitate
member access to the Exchange. A Dedicated SQF Host is an optional
offering available to Market Makers \5\--i.e., Primary Market Makers
(``PMMs'') and Competitive Market Makers (``CMMs'')--only for their SQF
Port & SQF Purge Port connectivity. A Dedicated SQF Host provides the
PMM or CMM with assurance that their SQF Port and SQF Purge Port
connection to the Exchange resides on a host that is not shared with
other PMMs and CMMs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The term ``Market Makers'' refers to ``Competitive Market
Makers'' and ``Primary Market Makers'' collectively. See ISE Rule
100(a)(25).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    4. Ouch to Trade Options Port.
    OTTO is an interface that allows market participants to connect and
send orders, auction orders and auction responses into the Exchange.
Data includes the following: (1) Options Auction Notifications (e.g.,
Flash, PIM,

Solicitation and Facilitation or other information); (2) Options Symbol
Directory Messages; (3) System Event Messages (e.g., start of messages,
start of system hours, start of quoting, start of opening); (5) Option
Trading Action Messages (e.g., halts, resumes); (6) Execution Messages;
(7) Order Messages (order messages, risk protection triggers or purge
notifications).
    5. Clearing Trade Interface Port.
    CTI is a real-time clearing trade update message that is sent to a
member after an execution has occurred and contains trade details. The
message containing the trade details is also simultaneously sent to The
Options Clearing Corporation. The information includes, among other
things, the following: (i) The Clearing Member Trade Agreement or
``CMTA'' or The Options Clearing Corporation or ``OCC'' number; (ii)
Exchange badge or house number; (iii) the Exchange internal firm
identifier; and (iv) an indicator which will distinguish electronic and
non-electronically delivered orders; (v) liquidity indicators and
transaction type for billing purposes; (vi) capacity.
    6. Financial Information eXchange Port.
    FIX is an interface that allows market participants to connect and
send orders and auction orders into the Exchange. Data includes the
following: (1) Options Symbol Directory Messages; (2) System Event
Messages (e.g., start of messages, start of system hours, start of
quoting, start of opening); (3) Option Trading Action Messages (e.g.,
halts, resumes); (4) Execution Messages; (5) Order Messages (order
messages, risk protection triggers or purge notifications).
    7. FIX Drop Port.
    FIX Drop is a real-time order and execution update message that is
sent to a member after an order been received/modified or an execution
has occurred and contains trade details. The information includes,
among other things, the following: (1) Executions; (2) cancellations;
(3) modifications to an existing order (4) busts or post-trade
corrections.
    8. Disaster Recovery Port.
    Disaster Recovery ports provide connectivity to the exchange's
disaster recovery data center in Chicago to be utilized in the event
the exchange has to fail over during the trading day. DR Ports are
available for SQF, SQF Purge, Dedicated SQF, CTI, OTTO, FIX and FIX
Drop.
    9. Market Data Port.
    Market Data ports provide connectivity to the Exchange's
proprietary market data feeds, including the Nasdaq ISE Real-time Depth
of Market Raw Data Feed (``Depth of Market Feed''),\6\ the Nasdaq ISE
Order Feed (``Order Feed''),\7\ the Nasdaq ISE Top Quote Feed (``Top
Quote Feed''),\8\ the Nasdaq ISE Trades Feed (``Trades Feed''),\9\ and
the Nasdaq ISE Spread Feed (``Spread Feed'').\10\ Each of the feeds
described above, with the exception of the Trades Feed, have previously
been established as market data offerings of the Exchange,\11\ and
market participants are charged for subscriptions to these
products.\12\ The Trades Feed is a free market data product provided to
subscribers of at least one of the fee liable market data products
described above. In connection with the adoption of Market Data ports
described above, the Exchange further proposes to establish the Trades
Feed. Market Data ports are available via multicast, TCP, or as an
intra-day snapshot, except that the intra-day snapshot option is
available solely for the Depth of Market Feed, Top Quote Feed, and
Spread Feed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Depth Feed, provides aggregate quotes and orders at the
top five price levels on the Exchange, and provides subscribers with
a consolidated view of tradable prices beyond the BBO, showing
additional liquidity and enhancing transparency for ISE traded
options. The data provided for each instrument includes the symbols
(series and underlying security), put or call indicator, expiration
date, the strike price of the series, and trading status. In
addition, subscribers are provided with total quantity, customer
quantity (if present), price, and side (i.e., bid/ask). This
information is provided for each of the five indicated price levels
on the Depth Feed. The feed also provides participants of imbalances
on opening/reopening.
    \7\ The Order Feed provides information on new orders resting on
the book. In addition, the feed also announces auctions. The data
provided for each instrument includes the symbols (series and
underlying security), put or call indicator, expiration date, the
strike price of the series, and trading status. The feed also
provides participants of imbalances on opening/reopening.
    \8\ The Top Quote Feed calculates and disseminates its best bid
and offer position, with aggregated size (Total & Customer), based
on displayable order and quote interest in the options market
system. The feed also provides last trade information along with
opening price, cumulative volume, high and low prices for the day.
The data provided for each instrument includes the symbols (series
and underlying security), put or call indicator, expiration date,
the strike price of the series, and trading status.
    \9\ The Trades Feed displays last trade information along with
opening price, cumulative volume, high and low prices for the day.
The data provided for each instrument includes the symbols (series
and underlying security), put or call indicator, expiration date,
the strike price of the series, and trading status.
    \10\ The Spread Feed is a real-time feed that consists of
options quotes and orders for all complex orders (i.e., spreads,
buy-writes, delta neutral strategies, etc.) aggregated at the top
price level on both the bid and offer side of the market as well as
all aggregated quotes and orders for complex orders at the top five
price levels on both the bid and offer side of the market. In
addition, the Spread Feed provides real-time updates every time a
new complex limit order that is not immediately executable at the
BBO is placed on the ISE complex order book. The Spread Feed shows
bid/ask quote size for Customer and Professional Customer option
orders for ISE traded options.
    \11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 59949 (May 20,
2009), 74 FR 25593 (May 20, 2009) (SR-ISE-2007-97) (Depth Feed);
62117 (May 18, 2010), 75 FR 29381 (May 25, 2010) (SR-ISE-2010-34)
(Order Feed); 65000 (August 1, 2011), 76 FR 47627 (August 5, 2011)
(SR-ISE-2011-44) (Top Quote Feed and Spread Feed); 65295 (September
8, 2011). The other market data products in the Schedule of Fees are
not subject to Market Data Port Fees.
    \12\ See Schedule of Fees, Section VIII, Market Data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    10. Fees.
    Currently, the Exchange charges Market Makers an application
programming interface (``API'') fee for connecting to the Exchange.
Each Market Maker session enabled for quoting, order entry, and
listening is billed at a rate of $1,000 per month, and allows the
Market Maker to submit an average of up to 1.5 million quotes per
day.\13\ Market Makers must pay for a minimum of two of these sessions,
and incremental usage above 1.5 million quotes per day results in the
Market Maker being charged for an additional session. Market Makers
that achieve Market Maker Plus \14\ in 200 or more symbols (other than
SPY) have their API fees capped at 200 quoting sessions per month.
Market Makers that achieve Market Maker Plus in SPY receive credit for
five quoting sessions. Market Makers that quote in all FX option
products \15\ do not have their FX option quotes counted towards the
1.5 million quote threshold, and receive additional credit for twelve
quoting sessions. All credited sessions are applied after the 200 API
session cap. Each Market Maker API session that is enabled for order
entry and listening is billed at a rate of $750 per month, and each
Market Maker API session that is enabled for listening only

is billed at a rate of $175 per month.\16\ In addition, the Exchange
charges Electronic Access Members (``EAMs'') that connect to the
Exchange via API a session fee of $250 per month each for the first
five sessions and $100 per month each additional session for
connectivity to both ISE and the Exchange's affiliate, GEMX. And the
Exchange charges EAMs that connect to the Exchange via FIX a session
fee of $250 per month each for the first two sessions and $50 per month
for each additional session for connectivity to both ISE and GEMX.
Finally, the Exchange charges gateway fees that are $750 per gateway
per month for shared gateways and $2,250 per gateway pair per month for
dedicated gateways, in each case for connectivity to both ISE and GEMX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Quoting sessions also support order entry and listening.
The Exchange separately offers Market Maker API sessions for
listening only ($175 per month per API), and order entry and
listening ($750 per month per API).
    \14\ A Market Maker Plus is a Market Maker who is on the
National Best Bid or National Best Offer a specified percentage of
the time for series trading between $0.03 and $3.00 (for options
whose underlying stock's previous trading day's last sale price was
less than or equal to $100) and between $0.10 and $3.00 (for options
whose underlying stock's previous trading day's last sale price was
greater than $100) in premium in each of the front two expiration
months. The specified percentage is at least 80% but lower than 85%
of the time for Tier 1, at least 85% but lower than 95% of the time
for Tier 2, and at least 95% of the time for Tier 3. A Market
Maker's single best and single worst quoting days each month based
on the front two expiration months, on a per symbol basis, will be
excluded in calculating whether a Market Maker qualifies for Market
Maker Plus, if doing so will qualify a Market Maker for Market Maker
Plus.
    \15\ The complete set of FX option products offered is: NZD,
PZO, SKA, BRB, AUX, BPX, CDD, EUI, YUK, SFC, AUM, GBP, EUU, and NDO.
    \16\ A listener may engage in any activity except submit orders
and quote, alter orders and cancel orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With the re-platform of the Exchange's trading system, the Exchange
will now be offering a new set of ports and gateways for connecting to
the Exchange as described in more detail above. The Exchange therefore
proposes to adopt fees for these connectivity options, which will
initially be $0 per port per month.\17\ The Exchange believes that it
is appropriate to provide these connectivity options without charge
during this initial migration period to avoid double charging members
that are connected to both the current T7 trading system and the new
INET trading system. In addition, adding these fees to the Schedule of
Fees now will alert members to the fact that they will not be charged
for access through these new connectivity options at this time. The
current API/FIX session and gateway fees will remain in place as
members are still using these connectivity options to connect to the
Exchange during the migration of the Exchange's trading system to
INET.\18\ The Exchange also proposes to add the Trades Feed to the
Schedule of Fees at a price of $0 per month. As explained earlier in
the filing, the Trades Feed is a free offering of the Exchange;
however, the Exchange believes that it would be beneficial to note this
fee product in the Schedule of Fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ Fees apply only to connectivity to the ISE INET trading
system.
    \18\ The Exchange will eliminate current API/FIX session fees at
a later date when those connectivity options are no longer available
to members.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
``Act''),\19\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\20\ in particular, in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees
being adopted for INET ports and gateways, as well as the fees for the
Trades Feed, are consistent with the provisions of Section 6 of the
Act,\21\ in general, and Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\22\ in particular,
in that they are designed to provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its members and other
persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \22\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest as it
establishes ports and gateways used to connect to the ISE INET trading
system. The Exchange's offerings are changing with the re-platform as
the ports and gateways used by INET differ from those used to connect
to the T7 trading system. Market participants that connect to the INET
trading system may use the following connectivity options mentioned
above: SQF, SQF Purge, Dedicated SQF Hosts, OTTO, CTI, FIX, FIX Drop,
Disaster Recovery, and Market Data. With the exception of Dedicated SQF
Hosts, these connectivity options are the same as those currently used
by the Exchange's affiliates, and therefore offer a familiar experience
for market participants. The ports and gateways described in this
filing provide a range of important features to market participants,
including the ability to submit orders and quotes, receive market data,
and perform other functions necessary to manage trading on the
Exchange. The Exchange believes that filing to establish these port and
gateway options will increase transparency to market participants
regarding connectivity options provided by the Exchange.
    With respect to Dedicated SQF Hosts, the Exchange notes that this
offering is meant to be similar to a current offering of the ISE, which
currently offers both shared gateways and dedicated gateways for
members that desire their own dedicated gateways as a risk management
alternative. Adding this new offering on the Exchange will allow
members that currently use dedicated gateways on the Exchange's T7
trading system to continue to use a similar connectivity option with
the migration to INET. The Exchange believes that market makers are the
participants that are likely to benefit from dedicated gateways, and is
therefore only offering dedicated gateways for the SQF interface. The
Exchange does not believe that it is unfairly discriminatory to offer
dedicated gateways only for SQF ports, which are only available to
market makers. Other exchanges also have gateways that are restricted
to market makers. The New York Stock Exchange, for example, offers DMM
Gateways that are only available to their Designated Market Makers.\23\
Currently, on the Exchange's T7 trading system, all of the market
participants that use the dedicated gateway offering are market
makers.\24\ Dedicated SQF is designed to provide a more deterministic
experience for ISE market makers when quoting on the Exchange by
allowing them to better load balance their trading sessions, but does
not provide any latency benefit when compared to using the shared
gateways, which are built on identical hardware to the dedicated
gateways. Market makers provide liquidity on the Exchange and have
continuous quoting obligations \25\ to the market that require the
ability to quickly and efficiently interact with their quotes and
orders. The Exchange therefore believes that these participants are
likely to benefit from the load balancing provided by the dedicated
gateways, which will aid market makers in their obligations to maintain
tight markets--a benefit that ultimately accrues to the benefit of all
market participants that trade on the Exchange. Based on the Exchange's
experience with the T7 dedicated gateway offering, the Exchange does
not believe that market participants using other protocols discussed in
this filing are likely to use dedicated gateways, and the Exchange is
therefore not offering such dedicated gateways for any of the other
ports. Building a dedicated gateway offering for the other ports would
require an additional technology investment. Since the only interest in
such technology to date has

been from the market making community, the Exchange has determined not
to build technology that it believes other members are not likely to
use.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79748 (January 6,
2017), 82 FR 3828 (January 12, 2017) (SR-NYSE-2016-93).
    \24\ While some market makers have used the dedicated gateways
for order entry sessions, the Exchange believes that the primary use
of these dedicated gateways is for the firms' market making
function. The Exchange has widely announced and talked to members
about its plans to offer dedicated gateways for SQF, and no firms
have requested that the Exchange provide dedicated gateways for the
other ports.
    \25\ See ISE Rule 804(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that it is consistent with the
protection of investors and public interest to establish the Trades
Feed as this feed, which is currently provided free of charge, provides
valuable trade information to subscribers. The Trades Feed designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade by providing all
subscribers with data that should enable them to make informed
decisions on trading in ISE options by using the data to assess current
market conditions that directly affect such decisions. The market data
provided by this feed removes impediments to, and is designed to
further perfect, the mechanisms of a free and open market and a
national market system by making the ISE market more transparent and
accessible to market participants making routing decisions concerning
their options orders. Furthermore, the Exchange believes that it is
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory to add the
Trades Feed to the Schedule of Fees at a cost of $0 per month to alert
members to the availability of this market data product. The Exchange
notes that the Trades Feed is a current offering that the Exchange is
adding to its Schedule of Fees at this time to increase transparency to
members.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that it is reasonable and equitable
to adopt fees for the various ports and gateways used to connect to the
Exchange's new INET trading system. As explained above, the ports and
gateways that will be used to connect to the INET trading system are
generally the same as those currently used by the Exchange's
affiliates, and in the case of Dedicated SQF Hosts, mirrors a current
offering of the Exchange. The Exchange has determined to offer these
connectivity options free of cost for the time being in order to aid in
the migration of the Exchange's trading system to INET technology.
Adding these fees to the Schedule of Fees will clarify to members that
they will not have to pay for access to both T7 and INET trading
systems. The Exchange also does not believe that the proposed fee
change is unfairly discriminatory as each of the proposed port and
gateway fees are initially proposed to be free of charge for all
members.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\26\ the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden
on intermarket or intramarket competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As explained
above, the Exchange is establishing the ports and gateways used to
connect to the ISE INET trading system. In addition, the Exchange is
adopting fees for access to these connectivity options, which will be
offered initially free of cost to aid in the migration of the
Exchange's trading system to Nasdaq INET technology. The Exchange does
not believe that establishing these ports and gateways, or providing
them to members free of charge, will have any competitive impact.
Similarly, the exchange does not believe that establishing the Trades
Feed, which is also a free offering and is being added to the Schedule
of Fees, will have any competitive impact.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \27\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \28\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In its filing, ISE requested that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay in order to enable the Exchange to establish ports and
gateways for members to connect to the Exchange's INET trading system
and access a related market data offering. The Commission believes that
such waiver is consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest. ISE notes that members have received numerous
communications indicating the availability of ISE INET ports and
gateways and will be using these connectivity options as soon as
symbols migrate to the INET architecture. Similarly, members have been
made aware of the availability of the Trades Feed. To avoid disrupting
member usage of ISE's connectivity and data options, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change to be operative upon filing.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2017-62 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-62. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the

Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2017-62, and should be
submitted on or before August 3, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\30\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-14664 Filed 7-12-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63370-63371]
[FR Doc No: 2021-25079]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Sunshine Act Meetings

    The following notice of meeting is published pursuant to section
3(a) of the government in the Sunshine Act (Pub. L. 94-409), 5 U.S.C.
552b:

TIME AND DATE: November 18, 2021, 10:00 a.m.

PLACE: Open to the public via audio web cast only. Join FERC online to
listen live at http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/.

STATUS: Open.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Agenda.
    * NOTE--Items listed on the agenda may be deleted without further
notice.

                      1084th--Meeting, Open Meeting
                     [November 18, 2021, 10:00 a.m.]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Item No.                 Docket No.            Company
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             Administrative
------------------------------------------------------------------------
A-1...........................  AD22-1-000.......  Agency Administrative
                                                    Matters.
A-2...........................  AD22-2-000.......  Customer Matters,
                                                    Reliability,
                                                    Security and Market
                                                    Operations.

A-3...........................  AD07-13-015......  FY 2021 Report on
                                                    Enforcement.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Electric
------------------------------------------------------------------------
E-1...........................  RM22-2-000.......  Reactive Power
                                                    Capability
                                                    Compensation.
E-2...........................  OMITTED..........
E-3...........................  ER21-2838-001....  Public Service
                                                    Company of Colorado.
E-4...........................  ER18-1639-010....  Constellation Mystic
                                                    Power, LLC.
E-5...........................  ER17-998-001,      DATC Path 15, LLC.
                                 EL17-61-001,
                                 EL18-91-000 (not
                                 consolidated).
E-6...........................  OMITTED..........
E-7...........................  ER20-1720-001,     Southern California
                                 ER20-1720-002.     Edison Company.
E-8...........................  ER20-1739-000,     American Transmission
                                 ER20-1739-001.     Systems,
                                                    Incorporated and PJM
                                                    Interconnection,
                                                    L.L.C.
E-9...........................  EL21-9-000.......  North Carolina
                                                    Electric Membership
                                                    Corporation v. Duke
                                                    Energy Progress,
                                                    LLC.
E-10..........................  ER20-1237-001,     Ameren Illinois
                                 ER20-1237-002.     Company.
E-11..........................  ER17-1609-003....  Carroll County Energy
                                                    LLC.
                                ER19-1215-002....  Cricket Valley Energy
                                                    Center, LLC.
E-12..........................  EL21-49-001......  Hecate Energy Greene
                                                    County 3 LLC v.
                                                    Central Hudson Gas &
                                                    Electric Corporation
                                                    and New York
                                                    Independent System
                                                    Operator, Inc.
E-13..........................  EL21-70-000......  Luna Valley Solar I,
                                                    LLC v. Pacific Gas
                                                    and Electric Company
                                                    and California
                                                    Independent System
                                                    Operator
                                                    Corporation.
E-14..........................  EL21-73-000......  Edgecombe Solar
                                                    Energy LLC v. Duke
                                                    Energy Progress,
                                                    LLC, Duke Energy
                                                    Florida, LLC, and
                                                    Duke Energy
                                                    Carolinas, LLC.
E-15..........................  ER21-1065-002....  TransCanyon Western
                                                    Development, LLC.
E-16..........................  EL21-89-000, QF21- Hecate Energy Blair
                                 629-001.           Road LLC.
E-17..........................  IN21-9-000.......  Golden Spread
                                                    Electric
                                                    Cooperative, Inc.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Gas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
G-1...........................  RP15-904-003.....  Gas Transmission
                                                    Northwest LLC.
G-2...........................  RP21-576-001.....  Transcontinental Gas
                                                    Pipe Line Company,
                                                    LLC.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Hydro
------------------------------------------------------------------------
H-1...........................  P-5737-013.......  Santa Clara Valley
                                                    Water District.
H-2...........................  P-14867-002......  Scott's Mill Hydro,
                                                    LLC.
H-3...........................  P-14869-002......  RAMM Power Group,
                                                    LLC.
H-4...........................  P-2310-227.......  Pacific Gas and
                                                    Electric Company.
                                P-2784-006, P-     Nevada Irrigation
                                 14530-001.         District.
H-5...........................  P-2487-048.......  Hydro Power, Inc. and
                                                    Albany Engineering
                                                    Corporation.
H-6...........................  P-15030-000......  Desert Pumped
                                                    Storage, LLC.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              Certificates
------------------------------------------------------------------------
C-1...........................  CP17-494-004.....  Pacific Connector Gas
                                                    Pipeline, LP.
                                CP17-495-004.....  Jordan Cove Energy
                                                    Project L.P.
C-2...........................  CP21-116-001.....  Gulf States
                                                    Transmission LLC.
C-3...........................  CP21-23-000......  Columbia Gas
                                                    Transmission, LLC.
C-4...........................  CP17-40-010......  Spire STL Pipeline
                                                    LLC.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary,
Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For a recorded message listing items struck from or added to the
meeting, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    This is a list of matters to be considered by the Commission. It
does not include a listing of all documents relevant to the items on
the agenda. All public documents, however, may be viewed on line at the
Commission's website at https://elibrary.ferc.gov/eLibrary/search using
the eLibrary link.
    The public is invited to listen to the meeting live at http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/. Anyone with internet access who desires to
hear this event can do so by navigating to www.ferc.gov's Calendar of
Events and locating this event in the Calendar. The event will contain
a link to its audio webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical
support for this free audio webcast. It will also offer access to this
event via phone bridge for a fee. If you have any questions, visit
http://ferc.capitolconnection.org/ or contact Shirley Al-Jarani at 703-
993-3104.

    Dated: November 10, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-25079 Filed 11-12-21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 37 (Tuesday, February 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10529-10530]
[FR Doc No: 2014-04012]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0973]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Animal Feed Network
(Pet Event Tracking Network and LivestockNet)--State, Federal
Cooperation To Prevent Spread of Pet Food and Animal Feed Related
Diseases

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by March
27, 2014.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0680.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 1350 Piccard Dr., PI50-400B, Rockville,
MD 20850<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.

Pet Event Tracking Network--State, Federal Cooperation To Prevent
Spread of Pet Food Related Diseases--and Livestock.Net; OMB Control
Number 0910-0680--Revision

    On August 1, 2011, the Pet Event Tracking Network (PETNet) was
launched by FDA and its partners in the Partnership for Food Protection
(PFP). PETNet is a secure, Web-based network that allows information to
be exchanged more freely and efficiently between FDA and other Federal
and State regulatory Agencies. PETNet allows the exchange of
information about pet food related incidents, such as illness
associated with the consumption of pet food or pet food product
defects. PETNet is only accessible by government employees with
membership rights, and each member has equal access to the data in the
system. At its launch, the system had over 200 members representing 4
Federal Agencies, all 50 States, and 3 U.S. territories. Using the
shared information, State and Federal Agencies can work together to
quickly determine if regulatory actions are needed to prevent or
quickly limit adverse effects associated with pet food products.
    Since its launch, PETNet has seen increased usage among members.
Two years following the launch of the system, there have been reports
entered by two Federal Agencies and multiple states. Approximately 60
percent of the entries are from Federal Agency members and 40 percent
by State Agency members. The majority of entries in PETNet are
associated with dog food products, followed by cat food products,
products affecting species ``other'' than those available in the drop-
down menu choices, and small mammal products. As familiarity with
PETNet has increased, there has been increased usage and entries from
members.
    PETNet was originally developed for pet animals only, but after its
initial launch in 2011, there have been ongoing requests to expand the
system to include livestock animals, aquaculture species, and horses.
Such an early alert system does not currently exist to share
information related to illness associated with consumption of
adulterated food or product defects for these species. LivestockNet has
been developed to serve as a similar early alert system for

feed-related illness and product defects associated with feed for
livestock animals, aquaculture species, and horses.
    LivestockNet and PETNet will be Web-based portals with the same
functionality, but the questions asked for each portal will be specific
for each. Users of the individual portals are expected to be the same
officials from Federal, State, and Territorial Agencies. Because of the
similarity of the portals and the intended audience for both, the two
individual portals will be housed in an overall system titled the
Animal Feed Network. PETNet and LivestockNet will be able to be
accessed individually in the Animal Feed Network, once the user logs in
to the system.
    Use of the Animal Feed Network, including the reporting of
incidents by non-FDA members, will continue to be voluntary. The Animal
Feed Network is a Web-based system, based in a proprietary system using
CORESHIELD technology, and will be accessible only to members via
password. PETNet and LivestockNet will make use of standardized
electronic forms that have been custom developed for the individual
portals. The two forms share the following common data elements, the
majority of which are drop down menu choices: Product details (name of
feed, lot code, product form, and the manufacturer or distributor/
packer (if known)), the species affected, number of animals exposed to
the product, number of animals affected, body systems affected, product
problem/defect, date of onset or the date product problem was detected,
the State where the incident occurred, the origin of the information,
whether there are supporting laboratory results, and contact
information for the reporting member (i.e., name, telephone number will
be captured automatically when member logs in to the system). For the
LivestockNet form, additional data elements specific to livestock
animals will be captured: Product details (indication of whether the
feed is a medicated feed, product packaging, and intended purpose of
the feed), class of the animal species affected, and production loss.
For PETNet, the only additional data field is the animal life stage.
The form would be filled out and submitted by a member in the specified
portal of the Animal Feed Network. Once the entry is submitted, it will
be available to other members. Thus, the information will be entered
and received by Animal Feed Network members in as close to real time as
possible. FDA and the PFP have designed the form itself to contain only
the essential information necessary to alert Animal Feed Network
members about animal feed and pet food-related incidents.
    In the Federal Register of August 26, 2013 (78 FR 52774), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
collection of information. Although four comments were received, none
were responsive to the four collection of information topics solicited
and therefore will not be discussed in this document.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                                         Table 1--Estimated Reporting Burden \1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                   Number of
               21 U.S.C. Section                   Number of     responses per   Total annual          Average burden per response          Total hours
                                                  respondents     respondent       responses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
21 U.S.C. 342, 21 U.S.C. 343, Section 1002(b)               20               5             100  0.25 (15 minutes).......................              25
 of the FDA Amendments Act of 2007/PETNet.
Ibid./LivestockNet portal.....................              20               5             100  0.25 (15 minutes).......................              25
                                               ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total Hours...............................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ........................................              50
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.

    FDA estimates that each member will report to the Animal Feed
Network (i.e., fill out the PETNet or LivestockNet form to alert other
members about a pet food or animal food-related incident, respectively)
approximately five times per year for each portal. This estimate
represents the maximum number of reports that FDA expects will be
submitted in a year, and in many cases the number of reports submitted
by a member will probably be far less. FDA believes that, given the
PETNet form has 15 items and the LivestockNet form has 19 items, with
most being drop down fields and not all fields being required for
submission, 15 minutes is a sufficient amount of time to complete the
form. State regulatory officials responsible for animal feed and pet
food already possess computer systems and have the Internet access
necessary to participate in the Animal Feed Network, and thus there are
no capital expenditures associated with the reporting.
    Regarding recordkeeping, State regulatory officials who report in
the Animal Feed Network receive the reportable information from
consumers in their States in the course of their customary and regular
duties. Further, these individuals already maintain records of such
consumer complaints in the course of their duties which are sufficient
for the purposes of reporting in the PETNet and LivestockNet portals of
the Animal Feed Network. Therefore, FDA believes that the proposed
collection of information does not have additional recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: February 20, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-04012 Filed 2-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 40 (Thursday, February 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13754-13755]
[FR Doc No: 2013-04721]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[Docket No. NHTSA-2012-0162, Notice 1]

Notice of Receipt of Petition for Decision That Nonconforming
2004 Ford F-150 Crew Cab Trucks Manufactured for Sale in the Mexican
Market Are Eligible for Importation

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, DOT.

ACTION: Notice of receipt of petition.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces receipt by the National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) of a petition for a decision that
2004 Ford F-150 Crew Cab trucks manufactured for sale in the Mexican
market that were not originally manufactured to comply with all
applicable Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), are eligible
for importation into the United States because they are substantially
similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for sale in the
United States and that were certified by their manufacturer as
complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-certified version of the
2004 Ford F-150 Crew Cab truck) and they are capable of being readily
altered to conform to the standards.

DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is April 1, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Comments should refer to the docket and notice numbers above
and be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: Comments must be written in the English language, and
be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to
the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are
submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that your comments were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
    How to Read Comments submitted to the Docket: You may read the
comments received by Docket Management at the address and times given
above. You may also view the documents from the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID number and title of this notice are shown at the
heading of this document notice. Please note that even after the
comment closing date, we will continue to file relevant information in
the Docket as it becomes available. Further, some people may submit
late comments. Accordingly, we recommend that you periodically search
the Docket for new material.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Coleman Sachs, Office of Vehicle
Safety Compliance, NHTSA<PHONE_NUMBER>).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A), a motor vehicle that was not
originally manufactured to conform to all applicable FMVSS shall be
refused admission into the United States unless NHTSA has decided that
the motor vehicle is substantially similar to a motor vehicle
originally manufactured for importation into and sale in the United
States, certified under 49 U.S.C. 30115, and of the same model year as
the model of the motor vehicle to be compared, and is capable of being
readily altered to conform to all applicable FMVSS.
    Petitions for eligibility decisions may be submitted by either
manufacturers or importers who have registered with NHTSA pursuant to
49 CFR part 592. As specified in 49 CFR 593.7, NHTSA publishes notice
in the Federal Register of each petition that it receives, and affords
interested persons an opportunity to comment on the petition. At the
close of the comment period, NHTSA decides, on the basis of the
petition and any comments that it has received, whether the vehicle is
eligible for importation. The agency then publishes this decision in
the Federal Register.
    Mesa Auto Wholesalers of Chandler, Arizona (Mesa) (Registered
Importer No. 94-018) has petitioned NHTSA to decide whether
nonconforming 2004 Ford F-150 Crew Cab trucks manufactured for sale in
the Mexican market are eligible for importation into the United States.
The vehicles which Mesa Auto Wholesalers believes are substantially
similar are 2004 Ford F-150 Crew Cab trucks that were manufactured for
sale in the United States and certified by their manufacturer as
conforming to all applicable FMVSS.
    The petitioner claims that it compared non-U.S. certified 2004 Ford
F-150 Crew Cab trucks manufactured for sale in the Mexican market to
their U.S.-certified counterparts, and found the vehicles to be
substantially similar with respect to compliance with most FMVSS.
    Mesa submitted information with its petition intended to
demonstrate that non-U.S. certified 2004 Ford F-150 Crew Cab trucks
manufactured for sale in the Mexican market, as originally
manufactured, conform to many FMVSS in the same manner as their U.S.
certified counterparts, or are capable of being readily altered to
conform to those standards. Specifically, the petitioner claims that
non-U.S. certified 2004 Ford F-150 Crew Cab trucks manufactured for
sale in the Mexican market are identical to their U.S. certified
counterparts with respect to compliance with Standard Nos. 102
Transmission Shift Lever Sequence, Starter Interlock, and Transmission
Braking Effect, 103 Windshield Defrosting and Defogging Systems, 104
Windshield Wiping and Washing Systems, 106 Brake Hoses, 113 Hood Latch
System, 114 Theft Protection, 116 Motor Vehicle Brake Fluids, 118
Power-Operated Window, Partition, and Roof Panel Systems, 109

New Pneumatic Tires and Certain Specialty Tires, 124 Accelerator
Control Systems, 135 Light Vehicle Brake Systems, 201 Occupant
Protection in Interior Impact, 202 Head Restraints, 203 Impact
Protection for the Driver From the Steering Control System, 204
Steering Control Rearward Displacement, 205 Glazing Materials, 206 Door
Locks and Door Retention Components, 207 Seating Systems, 208 Occupant
Crash Protection, 209 Seat Belt Assemblies, 210 Seat Belt Assembly
Anchorages, 212 Windshield Mounting, 214 Side Impact Protection, 216
Roof Crush Resistance, 219 Windshield Zone Intrusion, 225 Child
Restraint Anchorage Systems, 301 Fuel System Integrity, and 302
Flammability of Interior Materials.
    The petitioner also contends that the vehicles are capable of being
readily altered to meet the following standards, in the manner
indicated:
    Standard No. 101 Controls and Displays: Replacement of the
instrument cluster with a U.S.--model component.
    Standard No. 108 Lamps, Reflective Devices and Associated
Equipment: Installation of the following U.S.-model components on
vehicles not already so equipped: (a) Headlamps; (b) tail lamps (c)
front and rear side marker lamps; and (d) a U.S.-model high-mounted
stop lamp.
    Standard No. 111 Rearview Mirrors: Installation of a U.S.-model
passenger side rearview mirror, or inscription of the required warning
statement on the face of the existing mirror.
    Standard No. 110 Tire Selection and Rims and Motor Home/Recreation
Vehicle Trailer Load Carrying Capacity Information for Motor Vehicles
With GVWR of 4,536 kilgrams (10,000 pounds) or Less: Installation of a
tire and rim information placard.
    The petitioner states that each vehicle will be inspected prior to
importation for compliance with the Theft Prevention Standard in 49 CFR
part 541 and that anti-theft devices will be installed on all vehicles
not already so equipped.
    The petitioner additionally states that a certification label must
be affixed to the driver's door jamb to meet the requirements of 49 CFR
part 567.
    As previously stated, the petitioner claims that the vehicle, as
originally manufactured, complies with FMVSS No. 208 Occupant Crash
Protection. NHTSA seeks specific comments on whether the vehicle, which
is manufactured for sale in the Mexican Market, does in fact comply
with all requirements of FMVSS No. 208, including the unbelted occupant
protection requirements of this standard.
    All comments received before the close of business on the closing
date indicated above will be considered, and will be available for
examination in the docket at the above addresses both before and after
that date. To the extent possible, comments filed after the closing
date will also be considered. Notice of final action on the petition
will be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated below.

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30141(a)(1)(A) and (b)(1); 49 CFR 593.8;
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.50 and 501.8.

    Issued on: February 22, 2013.
Claude H. Harris,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2013-04721 Filed 2-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 28 (Friday, February 12, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 9329]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02856]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. EL21-44-000; QF94-155-013]

LSP-Whitewater Limited Partnership; Notice of Waiver Request

    Take notice that on January 29, 2021, pursuant to section
292.205(c) of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission)
Rules of Practices and Procedures implementing the Public Utility
Regulatory Policies Act of 1978, as amended, 18 CFR 292.205(c)(2017),
LSP-Whitewater Limited Partnership requested a waiver of the operating
and efficiency standards set forth in sections 292.205(a)(1) and
292.205(a)(2)(i)(B) of the Commission's regulations for its topping-
cycle cogeneration facility located in Whitewater, Wisconsin for
calendar year 2020, as more fully explained in its waiver request.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the website that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on February 19, 2021.

    Dated: February 4, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02856 Filed 2-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P