MSMHF-12	Camp	8/9/07	P	CPU disassembly	251	3.0	(0.060)	<0.03	<0.05	<0.3
<0.3	(62)

MSMHF-13	Camp	8/9/07	P	CPU disassembly	207	3.0	(0.069)	<0.03	<0.06	<0.3
<0.3	(108)

MSMHF-14	Camp	8/9/07	P	CPU disassembly	269	3.0	0.16	<0.03	<0.05	<0.2
<0.2	161

The following 12 samples were collected in the FPC GBO

MSMWF-1	Camp	8/8/07	P	Feeder	143	3.0	0.65	<0.05	6.8	3.7	<0.5	513

MSMWF-2	Camp	8/8/07	P	Feeder	140	3.0	0.69	<0.05	3.8	5.2	<0.5	619

MSMWF-3	Camp	8/8/07	P	Outside person 	137	3.0	(0.11)	<0.05	(0.22)	<0.5
<0.5	<73

MSMWF-4	Camp	8/8/07	P	Outside person 	135	3.0	(0.079)	<0.05	(0.21)
(0.57)	<0.5	(116)

MSMWF-9	Camp	8/8/07	P	Breaker, Front Side (left)	91	3.0	1.5	<0.07	0.59
12	<0.7	806

MSMWF-10	Camp	8/8/07	P	Breaker, Back Side (right)	88	3.0	0.42	<0.08	<0.2
(2.4)	<0.8	(140)

MSMHF-1	Camp	8/9/07	P	Outside person	150	3.0	0.49	<0.04	<0.09	3.1	<0.4
311

MSMHF-2	Camp	8/9/07	P	Outside person	148	3.0	(0.097)	<0.05	<0.09	(0.68)
<0.5	(173)

MSMHF-3	Camp	8/9/07	P	Feeder	147	2.9	2.1	<0.05	(0.18)	15	<0.5	891

MSMHF-4	Camp	8/9/07	P	Feeder	144	3.0	1.3	<0.05	(0.13)	8.8	<0.5	694

MSMHF-5	Camp	8/9/07	P	Breaker front side	109	3.0	2.0	<0.06	0.70	20	<0.6
856

MSMHF-6	Camp	8/9/07	P	Breaker back side	140	3.0	(0.13)	<0.05	<0.1	(1.0)
<0.5	<71

The following 6 samples were collected in the FPC GBO during filter
change

MSMHF-17	Camp	8/9/07	P	Filter change back, inside booth	45	3.0	5.0	<0.1
5.3	29	<1	1,704

MSMHF-19	Camp	8/9/07	P	Filter change front, inside booth	57	3.0	16	<0.1
12	105	<1	4,912

MSMHF-20	Camp	8/9/07	P	Filter change outside booth	62	3.0	1.6	<0.1	1.7
9.7	<1	753

MSMHF-21	Camp	8/9/07	P	Filter change outside booth	58	2.9	3.6	<0.1	4.4
22	<1	1,427

MSMHF-22	Camp	8/9/07	P	Filter change outside booth	47	3.0	1.3	<0.1	1.1
8.5	<1	(333)

MSMHF-23	Camp	8/9/07	P	Filter change outside booth	45	3.0	1.0	<0.1
(0.74)	(5.6)	<1	(274)

Table 5: Wipe Sample Results

SAMPLE I. D.	DATE	DESCRIPTION			Ba	Be	Cd	Pb	Ni

	Results in g/100 cm2

SAMPLES TAKEN FROM THE FCI FACTORY

MCMWG – 1	8/8/07	Cleaning area, table top where workers cleaning
monitors	1.8	<0.07	0.49	5.6	2.7

MCMWG – 2	8/8/07	Table top near repair worker	15	<0.07	3.0	35	17

MCMWG – 3	8/8/07	Table top near breakdown worker, laminate surface	5.1
<0.07	1.1	37	3.9

MCMWG – 4	8/8/07	Table top near breakdown worker, surface is floor-mat
material	16	<0.07	65	46	25

MCMWG – 5	8/8/07	Table top near breakdown worker, rough wood surface
8.9	<0.07	5.1	34	39

MCMWG – 6	8/8/07	Table top near testing worker, vinyl surface	5.9
<0.07	1.5	11	7.2

MCMWG – 7	8/8/07	Table top near sander, vinyl surface	20	<0.07	2.2	23
24

MCMWG – 8	8/8/07	Table top near worker doing copper stripping,
Masonite surface 	2.0	<0.07	0.73	14	3.7

MCMWG – 9	8/8/07	Table top near breakdown worker, rubber mat surface
2.6	<0.07	0.91	46	3.7

MCMHG – 1	8/9/07	Table top in breakdown area, rubber matt surface	18
<0.07	22	110	28

MCMHG – 2	8/9/07	Table top in breakdown area, smooth wood surface	0.60
<0.07	0.82	3.6	1.5

MCMHG – 3	8/9/07	Inside of Gaylord box containing small boards	1.0
<0.07	0.60	1.8	2.5

MCMHG – 4	8/9/07	Inside bailer in disassembly area	0.38	<0.07	(0.16)
2.5	1.2

MCMHG – 5	8/9/07	Rubber matt surface in breakdown area	21	<0.07	4.1	85
14

MCMHG – 6	8/9/07	Smooth wood surface in breakdown area	15	<0.07	3.0	17
7.3

MCMHG – 7	8/9/07	Smooth wood surface in breakdown area	80	<0.07	19	88
19

MCMHG – 8	8/9/07	Rough wood surface in breakdown area	11	<0.07	1.9	72
11

MCMHG – 9	8/9/07	Rough wood surface in breakdown area	62	<0.07	2.9	140
18

MCMHG – 10	8/9/07	Smooth work surface in copper stripping area	3.4
<0.07	0.54	9.8	2.7

MCMHG – 11	8/9/07	Top of sanding table in refurbish area, rubber
surface	53	<0.07	3.0	33	68

MCMHG – 12	8/9/07	Table top for refurbishing large assemblies, very
rough wood surface	1.4	<0.07	1.0	5.3	5.1

MCMHG – 13	8/9/07	Inside box containing “Frames with boards”
(0.16)	<0.07	<0.07	1.1	<0.3

MCMHG – 14	8/9/07	Smooth wood surface, disassembly operation in
refurbish area	7.4	<0.07	1.1	36	3.9

SAMPLES TAKEN FROM THE CAMP FACILITY

MSMWG – 1	8/8/07	Top of bookcase outside breaking area	1.3	<0.07	1.2
8.4	(0.75)

MSMWG – 2	8/8/07	Locker in GB area (top, under handle)	0.25	<0.07	0.31
2.9	(0.32)

MSMWG – 3	8/8/07	Top of conduit inside containment on interior wall
320	<0.07	360	5100	52

< Indicates a value less than the limit of detection.  Numbers in
parentheses indicate a result between the LOD and LOQ.Table 6:
Composition of Bulk Dust Samples from the Glass Breaking Operation

SAMPLE I. D.	DATE	SAMPLE DESCRIPTION	Ba	Be	Cd	Pb	Ni

MSMWB – 1	8/8/07	Bulk from filter in shop vac	1000	<0.2	170	2200	1800

		used for general cleaning

MSMWB – 2	8/8/07	Bulk from Nilfisk vac used 	890	<0.2	(1.3)	35000	7.7

		outside containment area

MSMWB – 3	8/8/07	Bulk from Nilfisk vac used 	82	<0.2	(0.98)	2300	2.1

		inside containment area

MSMWB – 4	8/8/07	Settled dust on top of locker	570	<0.2	130	2500	610

MSMHB – 1	8/9/07	Floor sweeping outside of 	470	<0.2	260	10000	31

		curtained area during filter change

			using broom to sweep floor

All samples were taken from glass breaking room at the camp facility.
Concentrations are in mg/kg.  < indicates a value less than the limit of
detection.  A value in parentheses indicates a result between the limit
of detection and limit of quantitation.

Table 7: Wet Bulb Globe Temperature Measurements, Marianna Federal
Correctional Facility

Heat Stress Data – August 8, 2007

Location	Times	Hourly TWA* WBGTin ºC (°F)

Camp – Glass Breaking Room	8:52 a.m. to 9:52 a.m.	28.8 (83.8)

	9:53 a.m. to 10:45 a.m.	29.7 (85.5)

Camp – Warehouse	9:41 a.m. to 10:41 a.m.	28.1 (82.6)

	10:42 a.m. to 11:42 a.m.	28.4 (83.1)

	11:43 a.m. to 12:43 p.m.	28.5 (83.3)

	12:44 p.m. to 1:44 p.m.	28.5 (83.3)

	1:45 p.m. to 2:45 p.m.	28.2 (82.8)

FCI – Refurbish	10:24 a.m. to 11:24 a.m.	28.3 (82.9)

	11:25 a.m. to 12:25 p.m.	28.9 (84.0)

	12:26 p.m. to 1:26 p.m.	29.1 (84.4)

	1:27 p.m. to 2:27 p.m.	29.1 (84.4)

	2:28 p.m. to 3:28 p.m.	28.8 (83.8)

FCI – Disassembly	10:31 a.m. to 11:31 a.m.	28.4 (83.1)

	11:32 a.m. to 12:32 p.m.	29.0 (84.2)

	12:33 p.m. to 1:33 p.m.	29.1 (84.4)

	1:34 p.m. to 2:34 p.m.	29.4 (84.9)

	2:35 p.m. to 3:35 p.m.	29.2 (84.6)

Heat Stress Data – August 9, 2007

Location	Times	Hourly TWA* WBGTin ºC (°F)

Camp – Glass Breaking Room	7:59 a.m. to 8:59 a.m.

29.7 (85.5)

	9:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.	30.4 (86.8)

Glass Breaking Room

during Filter Change	12:35 p.m. to 1:35 p.m.	31.2 (88.2)

Camp –Warehouse	8:44 a.m. to 9:44 a.m.	28.6 (83.5)

	9:45 a.m. to 10:45 a.m.	29.3 (84.8)

	10:46 a.m. to 11:46 a.m.	29.4 (84.9)

	11:47 a.m. to 12:47 p.m.	29.3 (84.7)

	12:48 p.m. to 1:48 p.m.	29.2 (84.5)

FCI – Refurbish	9:35 a.m. to 10:35 a.m.	29.2 (84.6)

	10:36 a.m. to 11:36 a.m.	29.6 (85.2)

	11:37 a.m. to 12:37 p.m.	29.7 (85.5)

	12:38 p.m. to 1:38 p.m.	29.7 (85.5)

	1:39 p.m. to 2:39 p.m.	30.1 (86.1)

	2:40 p.m. to 3:40 p.m.	30.3 (86.5)

FCI – Disassembly	9:04 a.m. to 10:04 a.m.	29.3 (84.7)

	10:05 a.m. to 11:05 a.m.	29.6 (85.3)

	11:06 a.m. to 12:06 p.m.	29.9 (85.9)

	12:07 p.m. to 1:07 p.m.	30.0 (86.0)

	1:08 p.m. to 2:08 p.m.	30.2 (86.4)

	2:09 p.m. to 3:09 p.m.	30.4 (86.8)

		*Time weighted average

Table 8: Estimated Work Rates

Location	Task	Work Rate	Metabolic Heat (Watts)

FCI	All tasks	Light/moderate	180/300

FPC	Unloading trucks	Moderate	300

	Warehouse work	Light	180

	GBO* helpers	Light/moderate	180/300

	GBO feeders	Moderate/heavy	300/415

	GBO breakers	Moderate	300

Table 9: Air Velocity Measurements for HFM 1 and HFM 2

Units in meters/second (feet/min)

Appendix A

Occupational Exposure Criteria for Metal/Elements

Appendix B

Metallic Composition of Bulk Dust Samples from the Glass Breaking
Operation

Concentrations are in mg/kg

Please see Table 6 for sample dates and descriptions.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MSMWB-1	MSMWB-2	MSMWB-3	MSMWB-4	MSMHB-1

Al	3900	120	54	5000	410

Sb	110	<3	<3	100	(8.3)

As	<7	<7	<7	<7	<7

Ba	1000	890	82	570	470

Be	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2

Cd	170	(1.3)	(0.98)	130	260

Ca	18000	770	150	26000	700

Cr	53	1.9	2.3	87	23

Co	5.2	<0.2	<0.2	18	0.63

Cu	210	28	3.5	320	52

Fe	9200	1100	800	18000	4300

La	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	2.3	(0.12)

Pb	2200	35000	2300	2500	10000

Li	(3.2)	(0.14)	<0.09	(15)	0.44

Mg	1800	72	16	3800	77

Mn	220	290	4.6	370	50

Mo	4.2	(1.1)	<0.4	6.0	(0.42)

Ni	1800	7.7	2.1	610	31

P	790	(33)	<10	2800	57

K	2700	190	190	3700	400

Se	<20	<20	<20	<20	<20

Ag	13	0.30	<0.08	1.8	<0.08

Sr	130	32	18	150	140

Te	<2	<2	<2	(3.5)	(4.0)

Tl	<5	(6.8)	(8.5)	(9.7)	<5

Sn	67	<4	<4	65	(7.9)

Ti	44	2.8	1.0	58	3.2

V	6.5	(0.10)	<0.1	15	<0.1

Y	2100	19	31	2300	5800

Zn	5900	4500	390	7700	13000

Zr	(2.0)	(20)	<2	(2.6)	(3.8)

Appendix C

Metallic Composition of Wipe Samples

Concentrations are in μg/100 cm2

Please see Table 5 for sample dates and descriptions.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MCMWG - 1	MCMWG - 2	MCMWG - 3	MCMWG - 4	MCMWG - 5	MCMWG - 6	MCMWG - 7
MCMWG - 8	MCMWG - 9	MCMHG - 1	MCMHG - 2	MCMHG - 3	MCMHG - 4

As	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2

Ba	1.8	15	5.1	16	8.9	5.9	20	2.0	2.6	18	0.60	1.0	0.38

Be	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07
<0.07	<0.07

Cd	0.49	3.0	1.1	65	5.1	1.5	2.2	0.73	0.91	22	0.82	0.60	(0.16)

Cr	1.1	6.0	2.7	8.2	12	2.4	4.7	2.3	3.2	9.8	(0.89)	(0.56)	(0.56)

Co	(0.18)	2.5	(0.25)	0.98	1.1	0.34	0.79	2.0	1.1	1.2	<0.09	(0.15)	(0.10)

Cu	5.1	35	12	68	130	14	36	14	51	83	3.3	3.3	2.2

Fe	58	567	137	667	3197	187	447	267	167	2297	21	49	95

La	<0.05	0.34	(0.077)	<0.05	1.3	(0.082)	0.37	(0.14)	(0.11)	0.87	<0.05
<0.05	(0.058)

Pb	5.6	35	37	46	34	11	23	14	46	110	3.6	1.8	2.5

Mn	1.8	18	4.4	22	110	7.0	15	35	22	35	(0.35)	1.4	1.8

Mo	<0.2	0.66	<0.2	2.9	2.2	<0.2	(0.34)	(0.22)	<0.2	0.71	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2

Ni	2.7	17	3.9	25	39	7.2	24	3.7	3.7	28	1.5	2.5	1.2

P	<6	301	13	22	<6	53	<6	<6	<6	<6	<6	<6	<6

Se	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3

Ag	0.16	0.76	0.29	9.7	5.2	0.28	0.32	(0.10)	0.26	3.7	(0.069)	(0.068)
<0.04

Sr	0.50	3.8	2.3	3.4	3.8	1.1	1.7	0.91	0.78	2.7	0.47	0.48	(0.36)

Te	<0.5	(0.72)	<0.5	<0.5	(0.51)	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5

Tl	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2

Sn	<3	19	32	44	39	(5.4)	13	11	95	190	(3.1)	<3	(3.6)

V	<0.05	0.29	(0.12)	(0.13)	(0.14)	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	(0.076)	(0.13)	<0.05
<0.05	<0.05

Y	(0.065)	1.3	0.91	2.9	0.41	0.20	0.51	(0.11)	0.19	1.4	(0.056)	<0.04
<0.04

Zn	108	638	348	598	728	178	178	138	558	708	218	138	98

Zr	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10

Appendix C (Continued)

Metallic Composition of Wipe Samples

Concentrations are in μg/100 cm2

Please see Table 5 for sample dates and descriptions.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MCMHG - 5	MCMHG - 6	MCMHG - 7	MCMHG - 8	MCMHG - 9	MCMHG - 10	MCMHG - 11
MCMHG - 12	MCMHG - 13	MCMHG - 14	MSMWG - 1	MSMWG - 2	MSMWG - 3

As	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2

Ba	21	15	80	11	62	3.4	53	1.4	(0.16)	7.4	1.3	0.25	320

Be	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07	<0.07
<0.07	<0.07

Cd	4.1	3.0	19	1.9	2.9	0.54	3.0	1.0	<0.07	1.1	1.2	0.31	360

Cr	6.7	2.7	6.5	4.1	10	2.7	9.3	2.1	(0.25)	2.0	(0.33)	(0.39)	13

Co	36	(0.14)	1.3	0.87	19	(0.22)	1.5	(0.17)	<0.09	(0.098)	<0.09	(0.11)
0.59

Cu	94	18	43	19	77	31	95	21	1.3	13	1.5	(0.8)	29

Fe	1897	157	887	501	1897	1797	527	267	7.3	177	10	1.7	1297

La	0.58	(0.055)	0.90	0.29	0.92	0.55	0.24	(0.13)	<0.05	(0.071)	<0.05
<0.05	1.5

Pb	85	17	88	72	140	9.8	33	5.3	1.1	36	8.4	2.9	5100

Mn	44	3.0	49	110	450	110	24	12	0.51	14	<0.1	<0.1	22

Mo	(0.27)	0.70	2.9	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	(0.39)	(0.28)	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2
(0.47)

Ni	14	7.3	19	11	18	2.7	68	5.1	<0.3	3.9	(0.75)	(0.32)	52

P	<6	<6	12	<6	<6	<6	20	<6	<6	<6	<6	<6	80

Se	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3

Ag	1.1	0.30	1.6	0.58	9.3	(0.066)	0.55	4.3	<0.04	0.58	<0.04	<0.04	1.2

Sr	2.4	1.2	4.7	1.7	2.6	0.94	2.8	0.79	(0.32)	1.8	0.91	0.72	170

Te	3.7	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5

Tl	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	(2.2)	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2

Sn	170	27	62	120	160	(4.1)	19	(4.0)	<3	43	<3	<3	12

V	(0.092)	(0.054)	(0.080)	0.21	0.56	<0.05	(0.14)	<0.05	<0.05	(0.073)
<0.05	<0.05	0.33

Y	0.14	(0.11)	1.1	3.3	2.0	(0.11)	0.45	(0.054)	<0.04	0.27	1.0	0.49	810

Zn	628	278	698	488	1298	488	308	148	91.3	378	118	148	3098

Zr	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10	<10

Appendix D

Metallic Composition of Airborne Dust Samples

Concentrations are in μg/m3

Please see Table 4 for sample dates, description, duration and flow
rate.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MCMWF-5	MCMWF-6	MCMWF-7	MCMWF-8	MCMWF-9	MCMWF-10

Aluminum	2.8	2.6	2.4	(1.8)	(1.5)	(1.3)

Antimony	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.6	<0.5	<0.6

Arsenic	<1	<1	<1	<1	<1	<1

Barium	0.15	0.26	0.21	0.077	(0.063)	0.11

Beryllium	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03

Cadmium	(0.052)	(0.079)	(0.047)	<0.03	<0.03	(0.052)

Calcium	17	17	12	9.1	7.8	8.1

Chromium	(0.24)	(0.13)	(0.18)	<0.1	<0.1	(0.22)

Cobalt	<0.04	<0.04	<0.04	<0.04	<0.04	<0.04

Copper	(0.29)	(0.33)	(0.17)	<0.1	0.53	(0.20)

Iron	5.4	5.9	6.1	3.5	2.3	4.2

Lanthanum	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01

Lead	(0.54)	<0.1	(0.17)	<0.1	(0.35)	<0.1

Lithium	<0.009	<0.009	<0.009	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01

Magnesium	1.3	1.1	0.96	1.2	0.53	0.67

Manganese	0.15	0.21	0.11	(0.093)	(0.12)	(0.13)

Molybdenum	<0.052	<0.08	<0.08	<0.08	<0.08	<0.08

Nickel	(0.19)	(0.11)	(0.13)	(0.089)	(0.15)	<0.08

Phosphorus	<4	<4	<4	<4	<4	<4

Potassium	1.6	1.0	0.82	(0.33)	(0.40)	(0.39)

Selenium	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3	<3

Silver	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03	<0.3	(0.050)

Strontium	0.077	0.066	0.057	0.050	0.039	0.049

Tellurium	<0.4	<0.4	<0.4	(0.44)	<0.4	<0.4

Thallium	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.6

Tin	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.6

Titanium	(0.065)	0.076	(0.054)	(0.044)	<0.03	(0.045)

Vanadium	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03

Yttrium	<0.008	<0.03	<0.03	<0.01	<0.02	<0.02

Zinc	7.7	6.1	5.7	5.8	3.4	2.9

Zirconium	(0.20)	(0.16)	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1

Appendix D (Continued)

Metallic Composition of Airborne Dust Samples

Concentrations are in μg/m3

Please see Table 4 for sample dates, description, duration and flow
rate.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MCMHF-1	MCMHF-2	MCMHF-3	MCMHF-4	MCMHF-5	MCMHF-6

Aluminum	(2.2)	<1	(1.4)	<2	<2	(1.8)

Antimony	<0.5	<0.5	<0.4	<0.8	<1	<0.4

Arsenic	<2	<2	<1	<3	<4	<1

Barium	0.26	0.19	0.17	<0.05	<0.07	0.14

Beryllium	<0.03	<0.03	<0.02	<0.05	<0.07	<0.03

Cadmium	(0.091)	(0.069)	(0.056)	<0.1	<0.1	<0.06

Calcium	14	9.5	12	<5	<7	(6.5)

Chromium	<0.2	<0.2	<0.1	<0.3	<0.4	<0.1

Cobalt	<0.06	<0.06	<0.05	<0.1	<0.1	<0.06

Copper	<0.3	<0.3	<0.2	<0.5	<0.7	<0.3

Iron	(4.6)	(3.5)	(4.7)	<5	<7	<3

Lanthanum	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.02	<0.03	<0.01

Lead	<0.3	<0.3	(0.40)	<0.5	<0.7	(0.37)

Lithium	<0.02	<0.02	<0.01	<0.03	<0.04	<0.01

Magnesium	<1	<1	<1	<2	<3	<1

Manganese	0.20	(0.12)	0.16	<0.08	<0.1	(0.13)

Molybdenum	(0.18)	<0.2	<0.1	<0.3	<0.4	<0.1

Nickel	<0.3	<0.3	<0.2	<0.5	<0.7	<0.3

Phosphorus	<5	<5	<4	<8	<11	<4

Potassium	1.0	(0.74)	0.90	<0.3	<0.4	(0.55)

Selenium	<5	<5	<4	<8	<11	<4

Silver	(0.022)	(0.018)	(0.012)	<0.03	<0.04	(0.017)

Strontium	(0.052)	(0.042)	(0.042)	<0.03	<0.04	(0.030)

Tellurium	<0.5	<0.5	<0.4	<0.8	<1	<0.4

Thallium	(0.77)	<0.6	<0.5	<1	<1	<0.6

Tin	<0.8	(0.82)	<0.6	<1	<2	<0.7

Titanium	(0.037)	(0.032)	(0.059)	<0.05	<0.07	<0.03

Vanadium	(0.031)	<0.02	<0.01	<0.03	<0.04	(0.014)

Yttrium	(0.014)	0.27	<0.01	0.20	<0.03	<0.01

Zinc	4.9	5.2	5.6	1.1	(0.74)	6.2

Zirconium	(0.18)	<0.2	<0.1	<0.3	<0.4	<0.1

Appendix D (Continued)

Metallic Composition of Airborne Dust Samples

4

5

R

W

_

-

+

=

?

Q

R

X

Y

Z

[

\

]

^

_

`

a

m

摧㝸Úᘀ_

`

a

b

m

@

B

C

E

f

‚

„

…

·

Ì

Ð

-m

n

æ

ç

B

„

Î

옍

옍

摧㤪¢

옍

옍

摧剢é

Æ

B*

hÙ

hÙ

B*

B*

h

B*

h

h

B*

B*

¡

Ë

®

Ÿ

¡

Ë

æ

ç

②朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

最⩤ꈹ氀჆

옍

ᘠ豨ꐋ㔀脈䩃

hŒ

hŒ

②朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

	”

ytŒ

ytŒ

ytŒ

ytŒ

ytŒ

ytŒ

ytŒ

ytŒ

最⩤ꈹ氀჆

最⩤ꈹ氀჆

Æ

  hO

 hO

hÕ

hÕ

hÕ

hŒ

hŒ

hÕ

hŒ

B*

B*

h4

h4

hú

hú

B*

h0

h0

0

1

²

³

¬

-

/

0

1

±

²

³

*

+

/

2

:

<

¢

¬

B*

B*

B*

Ff

②朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

~	\

莃莃ྃꚄ廿Ꚅ柿⩤ꈹ氀჆

ༀꚄ廿Ꚅ柿⩤ꈹ氀჆

ༀꚄ廿Ꚅ柿⩤ꈹ氀჆

ྀꚄ廿Ꚅ柿⩤ꈹ氀჆

~	\

h¯

h¯

h¯

h¯

h¯

h¯

h¯

h¯

hß

瑹֖

瑹֖

瑹֖

瑹֖

瑹֖

瑹֖

瑹֖

@

(ഀ⧆ഀӬ޼ઌබာዼᗌ᣶᭬Ḽ₲⏜♒莃莃莃莃莃莃ྃ뒄
帀뒄最⩤ꈹ氀჆

最⩤ꈹ氀჆

摧㤪¢(ഀ⧆ഀӬ޼ઌබာዼᗌ᣶᭬Ḽ₲⏜♒莃莃莃莃莃
莃ྃ뒄帀뒄最⩤ꈹ氀჆

$ഀ⧆ഀи޼ઌ൜ာዼᗌᢜ᭬Ḽℌ⏜♒莃莃莃莃莃莃枃⩤
ꈹ氀჆

最⩤ꈹ氀჆

③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

摧㤪¢$ഀ⧆ഀи޼ઌ൜ာዼᗌᢜ᭬Ḽℌ⏜♒莃莃莃莃莃
莃枃⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

②朂⩤ꈹ氀჆

愀Ȥ③朁⩤ꈹ氀჆

μg/m3

Please see Table 4 for sample dates, description, duration and flow
rate.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MCMHF-7	MCMHF-8	MCMHF-9	MCMHF-10	MCMHF-11	MCMHF-12

Aluminum	(1.0)	(1.3)	(2.5)	<1	<0.9	<3

Antimony	(0.42)	<0.4	<0.4	<0.4	<0.4	<1

Arsenic	<1	<1	<1	<1	<1	<5

Barium	0.12	0.18	0.21	(0.055)	(0.039)	<0.09

Beryllium	<0.03	<0.02	<0.03	<0.03	<0.03	<0.09

Cadmium	<0.05	<0.05	<0.06	<0.06	<0.05	<0.2

Calcium	7.1	11	15	(3.0)	<3	<9

Chromium	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.5

Cobalt	<0.05	<0.05	<0.06	<0.06	<0.05	<0.2

Copper	<0.2	<0.2	<0.3	<0.3	<0.3	<0.9

Iron	(3.9)	(2.6)	(6.3)	<3	<3	<9

Lanthanum	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.04

Lead	<0.2	<0.2	(0.44)	<0.3	<0.3	<0.9

Lithium	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.05

Magnesium	<1	<0.9	<1	<1	<1	<4

Manganese	(0.11)	(0.086)	0.22	(0.089)	(0.041)	<0.1

Molybdenum	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.5

Nickel	<0.2	<0.2	<0.3	<0.3	<0.3	<0.9

Phosphorus	<4	<4	<4	<4	<4	<14

Potassium	(0.43)	1.2	1.5	(0.27)	<0.1	<0.5

Selenium	<4	<4	<4	<4	<4	<14

Silver	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.05

Strontium	(0.022)	(0.041)	(0.047)	<0.01	<0.01	<0.05

Tellurium	<0.4	<0.4	<0.4	<0.4	<0.4	(2.1)

Thallium	<0.5	<0.5	<0.6	<0.6	<0.5	<2

Tin	<0.6	<0.6	(0.75)	<0.7	<0.7	<2

Titanium	<0.03	<0.02	(0.061)	<0.03	<0.03	<0.09

Vanadium	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.05

Yttrium	<0.01	0.075	<0.01	(0.066)	<0.01	<0.04

Zinc	3.4	5.6	7.9	2.5	0.77	<0.4

Zirconium	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.5

Appendix D (Continued)

Metallic Composition of Airborne Dust Samples

Concentrations are in μg/m3

Please see Table 4 for sample dates, description, duration and flow
rate.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MSMWF-1	MSMWF-2	MSMWF-3	MSMWF-4	MSMWF-5	MSMWF-6

Aluminum	(2.8)	(4.3)	<2	<2	<1	<1

Antimony	<0.7	<0.7	<0.7	<0.7	<0.5	<0.5

Arsenic	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2	<2

Barium	0.65	0.69	(0.11)	(0.079)	(0.055)	(0.041)

Beryllium	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	<0.03	<0.03

Cadmium	6.8	3.8	(0.22)	(0.21)	<0.06	<0.06

Calcium	28	36	<5	<5	(3.6)	(4.3)

Chromium	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2

Cobalt	<0.09	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.06	<0.06

Copper	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.3	<0.3

Iron	(8.2)	(9.8)	<5	<5	(3.9)	<3

Lanthanum	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.01	<0.01

Lead	3.7	5.2	<0.5	(0.57)	<0.3	<0.3

Lithium	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.03	<0.02	<0.02

Magnesium	<2	<2	<2	<2	<1	<1

Manganese	(0.17)	(0.16)	<0.07	<0.07	<0.05	<0.05

Molybdenum	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2

Nickel	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.3	<0.3

Phosphorus	<7	<7	<7	<7	<5	<5

Potassium	2.3	3.1	<0.2	<0.2	(0.18)	(0.20)

Selenium	<7	<7	<7	<7	<5	<5

Silver	(0.023)	<0.02	<0.02	<0.03	<0.02	<0.02

Strontium	0.19	0.29	(0.027)	<0.03	<0.02	<0.02

Tellurium	<0.7	(0.88)	<0.7	(0.94)	<0.5	<0.5

Thallium	<0.9	<1	<1	<1	<0.6	<0.6

Tin	<1	(1.3)	<1	<1	<0.8	<0.8

Titanium	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	<0.03	<0.03

Vanadium	<0.002	<0.02	<0.02	<0.03	<0.02	<0.02

Yttrium	2.1	2.3	0.36	0.17	<0.01	<0.01

Zinc	49	36	2.7	2.0	0.70	(0.43)

Zirconium	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2

Appendix D (Continued)

Metallic Composition of Airborne Dust Samples

Concentrations are in μg/m3

Please see Table 4 for sample dates, description, duration and flow
rate.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MSMWF-7	MSMWF-8	MSMWF-9	MSMWF-10	MSMWF-11	MSMWF-12

Aluminum	<2	<1	<3	<3	<1	<0.9

Antimony	<1	<0.5	<1	<1	<0.6	<0.4

Arsenic	<3	<2	<4	<4	<2	<1

Barium	<0.06	(0.042)	1.5	0.42	0.42	(0.063)

Beryllium	<0.06	<0.03	<0.07	<0.08	<0.04	<0.03

Cadmium	<0.1	<0.07	0.59	<0.2	<0.08	<0.05

Calcium	<6	(3.6)	23	<8	<4	<3

Chromium	<0.3	<0.2	<0.4	<0.4	<0.2	<0.1

Cobalt	<0.1	<0.07	<0.1	<0.2	<0.08	<0.05

Copper	<0.6	<0.3	<0.7	<0.8	<0.4	<0.3

Iron	<6	(3.6)	<7	<8	<4	<3

Lanthanum	<0.03	<0.02	<0.03	<0.03	<0.02	<0.01

Lead	<0.6	<0.3	12	(2.4)	<0.4	<0.3

Lithium	<0.03	<0.02	<0.04	<0.04	<0.02	<0.01

Magnesium	<3	<1	<3	<3	<2	<1

Manganese	<0.1	<0.05	<0.1	<0.1	<0.06	<0.04

Molybdenum	<0.3	<0.2	<0.4	<0.4	<0.2	<0.1

Nickel	<0.6	<0.3	<0.7	<0.8	<0.4	<0.3

Phosphorus	<10	<5	<11	<11	<6	<4

Potassium	<0.3	(0.23)	3.4	(0.46)	(0.24)	<0.1

Selenium	<10	<5	<11	<11	<6	<4

Silver	<0.03	<0.02	<0.04	<0.04	<0.02	<0.01

Strontium	<0.03	<0.02	0.59	(0.12)	(0.026)	<0.01

Tellurium	<1	<0.5	<1	<1	<0.6	<0.4

Thallium	<1	<0.6	<1	<2	<0.8	<0.5

Tin	<2	<0.8	<2	<2	<1	<0.6

Titanium	<0.06	<0.03	<0.07	<0.08	<0.04	<0.03

Vanadium	<0.03	<0.02	<0.04	<0.04	<0.02	<0.01

Yttrium	0.28	<0.02	26	7.5	1.2	0.11

Zinc	(0.86)	0.63	66	16	3.8	0.96

Zirconium	<0.3	<0.2	<0.4	<0.4	<0.2	<0.1

Appendix D (Continued)

Metallic Composition of Airborne Dust Samples

Concentrations are in μg/m3

Please see Table 4 for sample dates, description, duration and flow
rate.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MSMHF-1	MSMHF-2	MSMHF-3	MSMHF-4	MSMHF-5	MSMHF-6

Aluminum	(2.7)	<2	8.9	(5.3)	(5.2)	<2

Antimony	<0.7	<0.7	<0.7	<0.7	<0.9	<0.7

Arsenic	<2	<2	<2	<2	<3	<2

Barium	0.49	(0.097)	2.1	1.3	2.0	(0.13)

Beryllium	<0.04	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	<0.06	<0.05

Cadmium	<0.09	<0.09	(0.18)	(0.13)	0.70	<0.1

Calcium	(9.3)	(5.4)	33	32	19	<5

Chromium	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.3	<0.2

Cobalt	<0.09	<0.09	<0.09	<0.09	<0.1	<0.1

Copper	<0.4	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.6	<0.5

Iron	(5.1)	<5	16	(8.3)	(8.9)	<5

Lanthanum	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.03	<0.02

Lead	3.1	(0.68)	15	8.8	20	(1.0)

Lithium	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.03	<0.02

Magnesium	<2	<2	(2.3)	<2	<2	<2

Manganese	(0.10)	<0.07	(0.19)	(0.18)	<0.09	<0.07

Molybdenum	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.3	<0.2

Nickel	<0.4	<0.5	<0.5	<0.5	<0.6	<0.5

Phosphorus	<7	<7	<7	<7	<9	<7

Potassium	1.4	(0.45)	5.9	3.7	4.3	<0.2

Selenium	<7	<7	<7	<7	<9	<7

Silver	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.03	<0.02

Strontium	(0.067)	(0.025)	0.33	0.23	0.73	(0.055)

Tellurium	<0.7	<0.7	<0.7	(1.3)	<0.9	(0.86)

Thallium	<0.9	<0.9	<0.9	<0.9	<1	<1

Tin	<1	(1.3)	<1	<1	<2	<1

Titanium	<0.04	<0.05	<0.05	<0.05	<0.06	<0.05

Vanadium	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.02	<0.03	<0.02

Yttrium	8.0	0.60	52	23	37	1.7

Zinc	17	2.0	84	49	80	3.8

Zirconium	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.3	<0.2

Appendix D (Continued)

Metallic Composition of Airborne Dust Samples

Concentrations are in μg/m3

Please see Table 4 for sample dates, description, duration and flow
rate.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MSMHF-7	MSMHF-8	MSMHF-9	MSMHF-10	MSMHF-11	MSMHF-12

Aluminum	(1.0)	(1.7)	3.9	<0.9	27	<0.9

Antimony	<0.4	<0.3	(0.52)	<0.4	(0.43)	<0.4

Arsenic	<1	<1	<1	<1	<1	<1

Barium	(0.049)	(0.064)	0.20	(0.033)	1.6	(0.060)

Beryllium	<0.03	<0.02	<0.03	<0.03	<0.02	<0.03

Cadmium	(0.089)	0.24	0.49	<0.05	0.14	<0.05

Calcium	(4.4)	7.9	16	<3	177	<3

Chromium	0.19	0.12	5.0	<0.1	0.48	<0.1

Cobalt	<0.05	<0.05	0.30	<0.05	<0.04	<0.05

Copper	<0.3	<0.2	<0.3	<0.3	1.7	<0.3

Iron	208	168	2449	(3.9)	48	<3

Lanthanum	0.082	0.081	0.97	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01

Lead	<0.3	<0.2	(0.42)	<0.3	1.1	<0.3

Lithium	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01

Magnesium	<1	(1.1)	9.9	<1	13	<1

Manganese	2.5	2.8	27	(0.051)	0.91	(0.15)

Molybdenum	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1

Nickel	<0.3	<0.2	<0.3	<0.3	0.84	<0.3

Phosphorus	<4	<3	<4	<4	(8.7)	<4

Potassium	(0.23)	(0.34)	0.78	<0.1	45	<0.1

Selenium	<4	<3	<4	<4	<3	<4

Silver	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	0.099	<0.01

Strontium	<0.01	(0.039)	(0.054)	<0.01	0.47	<0.01

Tellurium	<0.4	<0.3	(0.50)	<0.4	<0.3	<0.4

Thallium	<0.5	<0.4	<0.5	<0.5	<0.4	<0.5

Tin	<0.7	<0.6	(0.69)	<0.7	<0.6	<0.7

Titanium	<0.03	<0.02	(0.050)	<0.03	0.85	<0.3

Vanadium	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	<0.01	(0.027)	<0.01

Yttrium	<0.01	0.32	(0.050)	<0.01	0.097	<0.01

Zinc	2.3	3.0	20	0.51	24	1.3

Zirconium	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	(1.0)	<0.1

Appendix D (Continued)

Metallic Composition of Airborne Dust Samples

Concentrations are in μg/m3

Please see Table 4 for sample dates, description, duration and flow
rate.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MSMHF-13	MSMHF-14	MSMHF-17	MSMHF-19

Aluminum	<1	<0.9	(7.1)	30

Antimony	<0.5	<0.4	<2	<2

Arsenic	<2	<1	<7	<6

Barium	(0.069)	0.16	5.0	16

Beryllium	<0.03	<0.03	<0.1	<0.1

Cadmium	<0.06	<0.05	5.3	12

Calcium	<3	(4.6)	<15	47

Chromium	<0.2	<0.01	<0.7	<0.6

Cobalt	<0.06	<0.05	(0.36)	0.82

Copper	<0.3	<0.3	<1	<1

Iron	<3	(3.6)	<15	41

Lanthanum	<0.01	<0.01	<0.07	(0.056)

Lead	<0.3	<0.2	29	105

Lithium	<0.02	<0.01	<0.07	<0.06

Magnesium	<1	<1	<6	<5

Manganese	<0.05	(0.048)	<0.2	(0.35)

Molybdenum	<0.2	<0.1	<0.7	<0.6

Nickel	<0.3	<0.2	<1	<1

Phosphorus	<5	<4	<22	<18

Potassium	<0.2	(0.38)	5.6	23

Selenium	<5	<4	<22	<18

Silver	<0.02	<0.01	<0.07	<0.06

Strontium	<0.02	(0.012)	2.1	7.6

Tellurium	<0.5	<0.4	<2	<2

Thallium	<0.6	<0.5	<3	<2

Tin	<0.8	<0.6	<4	<3

Titanium	<0.03	<0.03	<0.1	(0.23)

Vanadium	<0.02	<0.01	<0.07	<0.06

Yttrium	<0.01	<0.01	200	438

Zinc	2.3	3.6	467	1053

Zirconium	<0.2	<0.1	<0.7	<0.6

Appendix D (Continued)

Metallic Composition of Airborne Dust Samples

Concentrations are in μg/m3

Please see Table 4 for sample dates, description, duration and flow
rate.

<indicates a result less than the limit of detection.  Values in
parentheses represent results between the limit of detection and limit
of quantitation.

	MSMHF-20	MSMHF-21	MSMHF-22	MSMHF-23

Aluminum	<4	(6.5)	<5	<5

Antimony	<2	<2	<2	<2

Arsenic	<5	<6	<7	<7

Barium	1.6	3.6	1.3	1.0

Beryllium	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1

Cadmium	1.7	4.4	1.1	(0.74)

Calcium	<11	(12)	<14	<15

Chromium	<0.5	<0.6	<0.7	<0.7

Cobalt	<0.2	(0.24)	<0.3	<0.3

Copper	<1	<1	<1	<1

Iron	<11	<12	<14	<15

Lanthanum	<0.05	<0.05	<0.06	<0.07

Lead	9.7	22	8.5	(5.6)

Lithium	<0.05	<0.06	<0.07	<0.07

Magnesium	<4	<5	<6	<6

Manganese	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2	<0.2

Molybdenum	<0.5	<0.6	<0.7	<0.7

Nickel	<1	<1	<1	<1

Phosphorus	<16	<18	<21	<22

Potassium	(2.5)	4.8	(1.3)	(1.2)

Selenium	<16	<18	<21	<22

Silver	<0.05	<0.06	<0.07	<0.07

Strontium	0.81	1.5	0.57	0.49

Tellurium	<2	<2	<2	<2

Thallium	<2	<2	<3	<3

Tin	<3	<3	<4	<4

Titanium	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1	<0.1

Vanadium	<0.05	<0.06	<0.07	<0.07

Yttrium	51	131	38	24

Zinc	124	333	92	59

Zirconium	<0.5	<0.6	<0.7	<0.7

Figure I: Marianna FCI UNICOR Factory Floor Plan

Figure II: Marianna FPC UNICOR Factory Floor Plan

Figure III: Marianna FPC Glass Breaking Area

Figure IV: Marianna FPC Glass Breaking Booth

(Includes box of CRTs on hand truck below window in plastic curtain)

Worker feeds CRTs from box at left into enclosure where glass is broken.
Two horizontal flow modules (HFMs) are visible in the enclosed area.
Those units collect and filter air and recirculate the filtered air into
the enclosure.  The booth is enclosed on two sides by concrete block
walls and on two sides by plastic curtains.  It is enclosed on top by
plastic.  There is no mechanical ventilation in the GBO besides the HFMs

Figure V: Marianna FPC Glass Breaking Booth Work Stations

(Plastic curtain pulled to the left to show first work station)

Worker takes CRT from left, removes gun, breaks funnel glass, and passes
to right where second worker breaks panel glass.  The horizontal flow
modules (HFMs) collect and filter the air and recirculate the filtered
air inside the booth. The booth is enclosed on four sides and on top.
There is no mechanical ventilation in the GBO besides the HFMs inside
the booth.

Figure VI: NIOSH Recommended Heat-Stress Exposure Limits for
Heat-Acclimatized Workers [NIOSH 1986]

C = Ceiling Limit

*for “standard worker” of 70 kg (154 lbs) body weight and 1.8 m2
(19.4 ft2) body surface.

Figure VII: Recommended Layout of Typical Facility where Protective
Clothing is Required [DOD 1987].

Note the arrows showing the movement of the workers to segregate
contaminated equipment and clothing from clean items.  Workers shower
before re-entering clean locker rooms after removing contaminated
clothing.

Figure VIII:  Size Distribution of Airborne Particles

* This report documents the study conducted at Marianna, Florida.  Other
NIOSH DART field studies were conducted at Federal correctional
facilities in Lewisburg, Pennsylvania and Elkton, Ohio.

 On March 20, 1991, the Supreme Court decided the case of International
Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of
America, UAW v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 111 S. Ct. 1196, 55 EPD 40,605.
It held that Title VII forbids sex-specific fetal protection policies.
Both men and women must be protected equally by the employer.

 OSHA PELs, unless otherwise noted, are TWA concentrations that must not
be exceeded during any 8-hour workshift of a 40-hour work-week [NIOSH
1997].  NIOSH RELs, unless otherwise noted, are TWA concentrations for
up to a 10-hour workday during a 40-hour workweek [NIOSH 1997].  ACGIH®
TLVs®, unless otherwise noted, are TWA concentrations for a
conventional 8-hour workday and 40-hour workweek [ACGIH 2008]

 OSHA has referenced a Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
lead criteria in documents related to its enforcement of the lead
standard [Fairfax 2003].

 PAGE

 PAGE   ii

 PAGE

 PAGE   63


                                 DRAFT AGENDA                    US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY (EPA)                      FIFRA SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY PANEL (SAP)                                   OPEN MEETING                                DECEMBER 4-6, 2013               FIFRA SAP WEB SITE http://www.epa.gov/scipoly/sap/                       Docket Number: EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0490                       U.S. Environmental Protection Agency                          Conference Center Lobby Level                         One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.)                   2777 S. Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA 22202                                         Scientific Uncertainties Associated with Corn Rootworm Resistance Monitoring for Bt corn Plant Incorporated Protectants (PIPs)                                            Please note that all times are approximate (see note at end of Agenda).                                      Day 1                           Wednesday, December 4, 2013

9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures  -  Fred Jenkins, Ph.D., Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members  -  Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Chair  9:10 A.M. Welcome and Opening Remarks  -  Steven Bradbury, Ph.D., Director, Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP), EPA

9:25 A.M. EPA Presentations

10:30 A.M. Break

10:45 A.M. EPA Presentations (Cont'd)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:00 P.M. EPA Presentations (Cont'd)

3:00 P.M. Break

3:15 P.M. EPA Presentations (Cont'd)

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

                                    Day 2                            Thursday, December 5, 2013

9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures  -  Fred Jenkins, Ph.D., Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members  -  Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Follow-up from the previous day presentations

9:40 A.M. Public Comments

10:30 A.M Break

10:40 A.M. Public Comments (Cont'd)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:00 P.M. Public Comments (Cont'd)

3:00 P.M. Break

3:15 P.M. Charge to Panel

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

                                    Day 3                             Friday, December 6, 2013

9:00 A.M. Opening of Meeting and Administrative Procedures  -  Fred Jenkins, Ph.D., Designated Federal Official, Office of Science Coordination and Policy, EPA

9:05 A.M. Introduction and Identification of Panel Members  -  Daniel Schlenk, Ph.D., FIFRA Scientific Advisory Panel Session Chair

9:10 A.M. Follow-up from the previous day discussions

9:30 A.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

10:30 A.M. Break

10:45 A.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

12:00 P.M. Lunch

1:00 P.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

3:00 P.M. Break

3:15 P.M. Charge to Panel (Cont'd)

5:30 P.M. Adjourn

Please be advised that agenda times are approximate; when the discussion for one topic is completed, discussions for the next topic will begin. For further information, please contact the Designated Federal Official for this meeting, Dr. Fred Jenkins, via telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; or email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>


[Federal Register: May 24, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 100)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 29075-29077]
[DOCID:fr24my07-6]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2006-0985-200625; FRL-8318-1]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Georgia:
Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance Plan

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving two revisions to the Georgia State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the Georgia Department of
Natural Resources (GA DNR), through the Georgia Environmental
Protection Division (GA EPD), on July 25, 2006, and January 25, 2007.
The revisions include modifications to Georgia's Air Quality Rules
found at Chapter 391-3-20, pertaining to rules for Enhanced Inspection
and Maintenance (I/M). Enhanced I/M was required for 1-hour
nonattainment areas classified as serious and above, under the CAA as
amended in 1990. The I/M program is a way to ensure that vehicles are
maintained properly and verify that the emission control system is
operating correctly, in order to reduce vehicle-related emissions. This
action is being taken pursuant to section 110 of the Clean Air Act
(CAA).

DATES: This direct final rule is effective July 23, 2007 without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by June 25, 2007.
If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID Number, ``EPA-
R04-OAR-2006-0985,'' by one of the following methods:
    1. http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for

submitting comments.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    4. Mail: ``EPA-R04-OAR-2006-0985,'' Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960.
    5. Hand Delivery or Courier: Stacy Harder, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The
Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through Friday,
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID Number, ``EPA-R04-
OAR-2006-0985.'' EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit through
http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail, information that you consider to be CBI

or otherwise protected. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site is an

``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be

automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm
.

    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some

information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov or

in hard copy at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,

Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA
requests that if at all possible, you contact the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to schedule your inspection.
The Regional Office's official hours of business are Monday through
Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stacy Harder, Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is (404)
562-9042. Ms. Harder can also be reached via electronic mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. EPA's Action
II. Analysis of the State's Submittal
III. Final Action
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. EPA's Action

    EPA is approving two SIP revisions submitted by the State of
Georgia, through the GA EPD, on July 25, 2006, and January 25, 2007,
pertaining to rules for I/M. These revisions became State effective on
January 10, 2007. The proposed revisions in the July 25, 2006,
submittal include changes made by the State of Georgia to its Air
Quality Rules, found at Chapters 391-3-20-.01, .02, .03, .04, .05, .07,
.08 , .09, .10, .11, .12, .13, .15, .16, .17(1), .17(2)(a)1, .17(2)(b),
.17(e), .18, .19, .20, .21, and .22. The proposed revisions in the
January 25, 2007, submittal include changes to Chapters 391-3-
20-.01(m), and 391-3-20-.17(2)(a)1.

II. Analysis of the State's Submittal

July 25, 2006 Submittal

    Rule 391-3-20, Inspection and Maintenance, is being revised for the
purpose of removing outdated requirements, updating portions for
consistency with the CAA, enhancing enforcement capabilities, and
performing overall housekeeping edits associated with such an extensive
rule revision. Additionally, clarifying language is being added to the
rule, which includes clarification of applicability and of inspector
qualifications, the establishment of common terms, and the removal of
outdated language. Finally, the ``Waivers'' section of this rule, is
being revised to make the annual adjustment of the repair waiver limit
using the consumer price index data as published by the Federal Bureau
of Labor Statistics. For the test year 2006, the waiver limit shall be
$710.00 of qualifying repairs.

January 25, 2007 Submittal

    Rule 391-3-20-.01 ``Definitions,'' is being revised for the purpose
of incorporating the most recent version of the GA DNR motor vehicle
emission I/M policy (``Enforcement Policy''), dated July 28, 2006.
Additionally, the ``Waivers'' section of this rule (391-3-
20-.17((2)(a)1), is being revised to make the annual adjustment of the
repair waiver limit using the consumer price index data as published by
the Federal Bureau of Labor Statistics. For the test year 2007, the
waiver limit shall be $738.00 of qualifying repairs. For vehicles which
otherwise qualify for waivers during the 2006 test year, the waiver
limit shall be $710.00 of qualifying repairs.

III. Final Action

    EPA is taking direct final action to approve the aforementioned
revisions, specifically, Chapters 391-3-20-.01, .02, .03, .04, .05,
.07, .08 , .09, .10, .11, .12, .13, .15, .16, .17(1), .17(2)(a)1,
.17(2)(b), .17(e), .18, .19, .20, .21, and .22 into the Georgia SIP.
These revisions were submitted by GA EPD on July 25, 2006, and January
25, 2007.
    EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective July 23, 2007
without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by
June 25, 2007.
    If EPA receives such comments, EPA will then publish a document
withdrawing the direct final rule and informing the public that such
rule will not take effect. All public comments received will then be
addressed in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA
will not institute a second comment period. Parties interested in
commenting should do so at this time. If no such comments are received,
the public is advised that this rule will be effective on July 23, 2007
and no further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Please note
that if we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or
section of this rule and if that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the
rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
    This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
states, on the relationship between the national government and the
states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the CAA.
This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045, ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically significant.
    In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. In this
context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the State
to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority

to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the CAA. Thus, the requirements of section
12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
    The Congressional Review Act, U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 23, 2007. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: May 14, 2007.
Russell L. Wright, Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.

0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart L--Georgia

0
2. Section 52.570(c) is amended by revising the entry for ``391-3-20''
to read as follows:

Sec.  52.570  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                                            EPA-Approved Georgia Regulations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                      State
            State citation                   Title/subject       effective date           EPA approval date                       Explanation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
391-3-20.............................  Enhanced Inspection and       01/10/2007  05/24/2007 [Insert citation of
                                        Maintenance.                              publication].

                                                                      * * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
 [FR Doc. E7-10057 Filed 5-23-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 24, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 227)]
[Notices]
[Page 70990]
[DOCID:fr24no08-88]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12740-001]

Hydro Matrix Limited Partnership; Notice of Intent To File
License Application, Filing of Pre-Application Document, and Approval
of Use of the Traditional Licensing Process

November 18, 2008.
    a. Type of Filing: Notice of Intent to File License Application and
Request to Use the Traditional Licensing Process.
    b. Project No.: 12740-001.
    c. Dated Filed: September 24, 2008.
    d. Submitted By: Hydro Matrix Limited Partnership.
    e. Name of Project: Flannagan Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project would be located at the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers Flannagan Dam on the Pound River in Dickenson County,
Virginia.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: 18 CFR 5.3 of the Commission's regulations.
    h. Applicant Contact: James B. Price, President, Hydro Matrix
Limited Partnership, P.O. Box 903, Gatlinburg, TN 37738,<PHONE_NUMBER>
(business),<PHONE_NUMBER> (mobile).
    i. FERC Contact: Nicholas Palso,<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Hydro Matrix Partnership Limited filed its request to use the
Traditional Licensing Process on September 24, 2008. Hydro Matrix
Partnership Limited filed public notice of its request on September 24,
2008. In a letter dated November 12, 2008, the Director of the Office
of Energy Projects approved Hydro Matrix Partnership Limited's request
to use the Traditional Licensing Process.
    k. With this notice, we are approving Hydro Matrix Limited
Partnership's request to be designated as the non-federal
representative for section 7 of the Endangered Species Act and its
request to initiate consultation under section 106 of the National
Historic Preservation Act; and recommending that it begin informal
consultation with: (a) The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; and (b) the
Virginia State Historic Preservation Officer, as required by section
106, National Historical Preservation Act, and the implementing
regulations of the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation at 36 CFR
800.2.
    l. Hydro Matrix Partnership Limited filed a Pre-Application
Document (PAD; including a proposed process plan and schedule) with the
Commission, pursuant to 18 CFR 5.6 of the Commission's regulations.
    m. A copy of the PAD is available for review at the Commission in
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov), using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket
number, excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to
access the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
(202) 502-8659. A copy is also available for inspection and
reproduction at the address in paragraph h.
    Register online at http://ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via e-mail of new filing and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-27816 Filed 11-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

	40 CFR Part 52

	[EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0370; FRL-       ]

	Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;

	Pennsylvania; Clean Air Interstate Rule; NOx SIP Call Rule; Amendments
to NOx Control Rules

AGENCY:	Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION:	Final rule.

SUMMARY:  EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.  The revision addresses
the requirements of EPA’s Clean Air Interstate Rule (CAIR) and
modifies other requirements in Pennsylvania’s SIP that interact with
CAIR including:  the termination of Pennsylvania’s NOx Budget Trading
Program; statewide provisions for large, stationary internal combustion
engines; statewide provisions for large cement kilns; provisions for
small sources of NOx in the Pennsylvania portion of the Philadelphia
8-hour ozone nonattainment area; and emission reduction credits.   EPA
is determining that the SIP revision fully implements the CAIR
requirements for Pennsylvania.  Although the D.C. Circuit found CAIR to
be flawed, the rule was remanded without vacatur and thus remains in
place.  Thus, EPA is continuing to take action on CAIR SIPs as
appropriate.  CAIR, as promulgated, requires States to reduce emissions
of SO2 and NOx that significantly contribute to, or interfere with
maintenance of, the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for
fine particulates and/or ozone in any downwind state.  CAIR establishes
budgets for SO2 and NOX for States that contribute significantly to
nonattainment in downwind States and requires the significantly
contributing States to submit SIP revisions that implement these
budgets.  States have the flexibility to choose which control measures
to adopt to achieve the budgets, including participation in
EPA-administered cap-and-trade programs addressing SO2, NOX annual, and
NOX ozone season emissions.  In the SIP revision that EPA is approving,
Pennsylvania will meet CAIR requirements by participating in these
cap-and-trade programs.  EPA is approving the SIP revision, with the
exceptions noted, as fully implementing the CAIR requirements for
Pennsylvania.  Consequently, this action will also cause the CAIR
Federal Implementation Plans (CAIR FIPs) concerning SO2, NOX annual, and
NOX ozone season emissions by Pennsylvania sources to be automatically
withdrawn.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  The final rule is effective on [Insert date of
publication].

ADDRESSES:  EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0370.  All documents in the docket are listed in
the www.regulations.gov website.   Although listed in the electronic
docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e., confidential
business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.  Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form.  Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy for public inspection during normal business hours at the Air
Protection Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region III,
1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State
submittal are available at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection, Bureau of Air Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market
Street, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania 17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Marilyn Powers,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:   Throughout this document, whenever
“we,” “us,” or “our” is used, we mean EPA.

Table of Contents

I.  What Action Did EPA Propose?

II. Summary of Pennsylvania SIP Revision

III. What is the Final Action?

IV. What is the Effective Date?

V.  Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I.  What Action Did EPA Propose?

On September 24, 2009 (74 FR 48695), EPA published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPR) for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.  The NPR proposed
approval of a revision to the Pennsylvania SIP that addresses EPA’s
CAIR requirements and modifies other requirements in Pennsylvania’s
SIP that interact with CAIR including: the termination of
Pennsylvania’s NOx Budget Trading Program; statewide provisions for
large, stationary internal combustion engines; statewide provisions for
large cement kilns; provisions for small sources of NOx in the
Pennsylvania portion of the Philadelphia 8-hour ozone nonattainment
area; and emission reduction credits.

Summary of Pennsylvania SIP Revision

On May 23, 2008, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection
(PADEP) submitted a full CAIR SIP revision to meet the requirements of
CAIR, which was promulgated on May 12, 2005 (70 FR 25162), and
subsequently revised on April 28, 2006, and December 13, 2006.  The SIP
revision consisted of amendments to Pennsylvania regulations codified at
25 Pa. Code Chapters 121, 129, and 145.  The SIP revision addresses all
the requirements of the 40 CFR part 96 model rules set forth in the May
12, 2005 CAIR rulemaking.  In addition, the SIP revision modifies other
requirements in Pennsylvania’s SIP that interact with CAIR.  A
detailed discussion of the CAIR requirements, the CAIR history
(including the CAIR remand), Pennsylvania’s CAIR submittal, the other
modifications in the SIP revision that interact with CAIR, and EPA’s
rationale for approval of the Pennsylvania SIP revision may be found in
the NPR and will not be repeated here. No comments were received.

EPA notes that, in North Carolina, 531 F.3d at 916-21, the Court
determined, among other things, that the State SO2 and NOX budgets
established in CAIR were arbitrary and capricious.  However, as
discussed above, the Court also decided to remand CAIR but to leave the
rule in place in order to “temporarily preserve the environmental
values covered by CAIR” pending EPA’s development and promulgation
of a replacement rule that remedies CAIR’s flaws.  North Carolina, 550
F.3d at 1178.  EPA had indicated to the Court that development and
promulgation of a replacement rule would take about two years.  Reply in
Support of Petition for Rehearing or Rehearing en Banc at 5 (filed Nov.
17, 2008 in North Carolina v. EPA, Case No. 05-1224, D.C. Cir.).  The
process at EPA of developing a proposal that will undergo notice and
comment and result in a final replacement rule is ongoing.  In the
meantime, consistent with the Court’s orders, EPA is implementing CAIR
by approving State SIP revisions that are consistent with CAIR (such as
the provisions setting State SO2 and NOX budgets for the CAIR trading
programs) in order to “temporarily preserve” the environmental
benefits achievable under the CAIR trading programs.

III.  What is the Final Action?

EPA is approving the Pennsylvania CAIR SIP revision submitted on July
23, 2008.  Under the SIP revision, Pennsylvania will participate in the
EPA-administered cap-and-trade programs for NOx annual, NOx ozone
season, and SO2 annual emissions.  The SIP revision meets the applicable
requirements in 40 CFR 51.123(o) and (aa), with regard to NOX annual and
NOX ozone season emissions, and 40 CFR 51.124(o), with regard to SO2
emissions.  As a consequence of the SIP approval, the CAIR FIPs for
Pennsylvania are automatically withdrawn, in accordance with the
automatic withdrawal provisions of EPA’s November 2, 2007 rulemaking
(72 FR 62338).   The automatic withdrawal is reflected in the rule text
that accompanies this notice and deletes and reserves the provisions in
Part 52 that establish the CAIR FIPs for Pennsylvania sources.

The SIP revision also modifies other requirements in Pennsylvania’s
SIP that interact with CAIR including:  the termination of
Pennsylvania’s NOx Budget Trading Program; statewide provisions for
large, stationary internal combustion engines; statewide provisions for
large cement kilns; provisions for small sources of NOx in the
Pennsylvania portion of the Philadelphia 8-hour ozone nonattainment
area; and emission reduction credits.

IV.  What is the Effective Date?

EPA finds that there is good cause for this approval to become effective
upon publication because a delayed effective date is unnecessary due to
the nature of the approval, which allows the Commonwealth, as indicated
in the NPR for this rulemaking, to use its own methodology for
distribution and timing of NOx allowances.  The expedited effective date
for this action is authorized under both 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1), which
provides that rule actions may become effective less than 30 days after
publication if the rule ‘‘grants or recognizes an exemption or
relieves a restriction’’ and section 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), which
allows an effective date less than 30 days after publication ‘‘as
otherwise provided by the agency for good cause found and published with
the rule.’’

CAIR SIP approvals relieve states and CAIR sources within states from
being subject to provisions in the CAIR FIPs that otherwise would apply
to them, allowing states to implement CAIR based on their SIP-approved
state rule. The relief from these obligations is sufficient reason to
allow an expedited effective date of this rule under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(1).
 In addition, Pennsylvania’s relief from these obligations provides
good cause to make this rule effective immediately upon publication,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3).  The purpose of the 30-day waiting
period prescribed in 5 U.S.C. 553(d) is to give affected parties a
reasonable time to adjust their behavior and prepare before the final
rule takes effect. Where, as here, the final rule relieves obligations
rather than imposes obligations, affected parties, such as the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and CAIR sources within the Commonwealth,
do not need time to adjust and prepare before the rule takes effect.

V.   Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A.   General Requirements

Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations.  42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).  Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.  Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law.  For that reason, this action:

is not a "significant regulatory action” subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993);

does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);

is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);

does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);

does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order
13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997);

is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211
(66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the
Clean Air Act; and

does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects,
using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP
is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state, and EPA
notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.

B.   Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the
rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to
each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United
States.  EPA will submit a report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.  A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register.
 This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

C.  Petitions for Judicial Review

Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial
review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of
Appeals for the appropriate circuit by [Insert date 60 days from date of
publication of this document in the Federal Register].  Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action.

This action to approve the Pennsylvania SIP revision to meet the
requirements of CAIR and modify associated provisions that interact with
CAIR may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its
requirements.  (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides.

November 25, 2009______				/s/___________________________

Dated:                            				Shawn M. Garvin,
             								Regional Administrator,

                                  					Region III.

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52 - [AMENDED]

1.  The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

               Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart NN(Pennsylvania

2. In ( 52.2020, the table in paragraph (c)(1) is amended by:

  a. Revising entries for Title 25, Chapter 121, Section 121.1, Chapter
129, Sections 129.201, 129.202, and 129.204; Subchapter B, Section
145.113, and Subchapter C, Section 145.143.

  b. Adding entries for Title 25, Chapter 145, Subchapter A, Section
145.8; Subchapter D, Sections 145.201 through 145.205, Sections 145.211
through 145.213, and Sections 145.221 through 145.223.

The amendments read as follows:

( 52.2020  	Identification of plan.

* 	* 	* 	* 	*

(c) ***

(1) ***

State citation

Title/subject

State effective date

EPA approval date

Additional

explanation/

( 52.2063 citation

	TITLE 25.  ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

	ARTICLE III.  AIR RESOURCES

*       *      *     *      *      *      *

CHAPTER 121. 	GENERAL PROVISIONS

Section 121.1

	Definitions	4/12/08	[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert
page number where the document begins]	Add definition for “vintage or
vintage year”

CHAPTER 129.	STANDARDS FOR SOURCES ADDITIONAL NOx REQUIREMENTS

Section 129.201

Boilers.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

Revised section.

Section 129.202

Stationary combustion turbines.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

Revised section.

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

Section 129.204

Emission accountability.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

Revised section.

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

CHAPTER 145.

INTERSTATE POLLUTION TRANSPORT REDUCTION

Subchapter A.

NOx  BUDGET TRADING PROGRAM GENERAL PROVISIONS

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

Section 145.8

Transition to CAIR NOx Trading Programs	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

New section.

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

Subchapter B.

Emissions of NOx From Stationary Internal Combustion Engines

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

Section 145.113

Standard requirements.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

New subsection d.

Subchapter C

Emissions of NOx From Cement Manufacturing

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

Section 145.143

Standard requirements.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

Subchapter D.

CAIR NOx And SO2 Trading Programs – General Provisions

Section 145.201

Purpose.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

Section 145.202

Definitions.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

Section 145.203

Applicability.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

Section 145.204

Incorporation of Federal regulations by reference.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CHAPTER 127

EMISSION REDUCTION CREDIT PROVISIONS

Section 145.205

Emission reduction credit provisions.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CAIR NOx ANNUAL TRADING PROGRAM

Section 145.211	Timing Requirements for CAIR NOx allowance allocations.
4/12/08	[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number
where the document begins]

Section 145.212

CAIR NOx allowance allocations.	4/12/08	[Insert Federal Register
publication date] [Insert page number where the document begins]

Section 145.213

Supplemental monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for
gross electrical output and useful thermal energy for units subject to
40 CFR 96.170-96.175.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR CAIR NOx OZONE SEASON TRADING PROGRAM

Section 145.221

Timing requirements for CAIR NOx ozone season allowance allocations
4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

Section 145.222

CAIR NOx Ozone Season allowance allocations.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

Section 145.223

Supplemental monitoring, recordkeeping and reporting requirements for
gross electrical output and useful thermal energy for units subject to
40 CFR 96.370 – 96.375.	4/12/08

[Insert Federal Register publication date] [Insert page number where the
document begins]

*       *       *       *       *       *       *

*             *             *            *            *

§ 52.2040 [Removed and Reserved]

3.  Section 52.2040 is removed and reserved.

§ 52.2041 [Removed and Reserved]

4.  Section 52.2041 is removed and reserved.

1 The Court also determined that the CAIR trading programs were unlawful
(id. at 906-8) and that the treatment of title IV allowances in CAIR was
unlawful (id. at 921-23).  For the same reasons that EPA is approving
the provisions of Pennsylvania’s SIP revision that use the SO2 and NOX
budgets set in CAIR, EPA is also approving, as discussed below,
Pennsylvania’s SIP revision to the extent the SIP revision adopts the
CAIR trading programs, including the provisions, addressing
applicability, allowance allocations, and use of title IV allowances.

 PAGE

 PAGE  15


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 117 (Tuesday, June 18, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 28325]
[FR Doc No: 2019-12874]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4423-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2019-0001]

Cahuilla Band of Indians; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major
Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Cahuilla Band of Indians (FEMA-4423-DR), dated March 28, 2019,
and related determinations.

DATES: This change occurred on May 9, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, Benigno Bern
Ruiz, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer
for this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Mark Wingate as Federal
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Acting Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2019-12874 Filed 6-17-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: June 6, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 110)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 32258-32259]
[DOCID:fr06jn08-19]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0614; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-351-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500 series airplanes. This proposed AD
would require performing repetitive operational tests of the engine
fuel suction feed of the fuel system, and other related testing if
necessary. This proposed AD results from a report of in-service
occurrences of loss of fuel system suction feed capability, followed by
total loss of pressure of the fuel feed system. We are proposing this
AD to detect and correct failure of the engine fuel suction feed of the
fuel system, which could result in dual engine flameout, inability to
restart the engines, and consequent forced landing of the airplane.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 21, 2008.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-2207.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sue Lucier, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification
Office, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 917-6438; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0614;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-351-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    We have received a report of in-service occurrences of loss of fuel
system suction feed capability, followed by total loss of pressure of
the fuel feed system. This condition, if not corrected, could result in
dual engine flameout, inability to restart the engines, and consequent
forced landing of the airplane.

FAA's Conclusions

    We have determined that it is necessary to require an operational
test of the engine fuel suction feed of the fuel system, and other
related testing, as applicable. Procedures for doing the operational
test can be found in the maintenance manual. The other related testing
is for airplanes on which deterioration or fast changes in the engine
RPM are found during the operational test. Failure of the engine fuel
suction feed of the fuel system could result in the unsafe condition
described previously.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    We are proposing this AD because we have evaluated all pertinent
information and identified an unsafe condition that is likely to exist
or develop on other airplanes of this same type design. This proposed
AD would require performing repetitive operational tests of the engine
fuel suction feed of the fuel system, and other related testing if
necessary.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD would affect 669 airplanes of
U.S. registry. We also estimate that it would take 1 work-hour per
product, per test, to comply with this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost
of this proposed AD to the U.S. operators to be $53,520, or $80 per
product, per test.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that

section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for practices,
methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in
air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979), and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    You can find our regulatory evaluation and the estimated costs of
compliance in the AD Docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Boeing: Docket No. FAA-2008-0614; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-
351-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by July 21, 2008.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to all Boeing Model 737-300, -400, and -500
series airplanes, certificated in any category.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from a report of in-service occurrences of
loss of fuel system suction feed capability, followed by total loss
of pressure of the fuel feed system. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct failure of the engine fuel suction feed of the
fuel system, which could result in dual engine flameout, inability
to restart the engines, and consequent forced landing of the
airplane.

Compliance

    (e) Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

Operational Test/Related Testing

    (f) Within 7,500 flight hours after the effective date of this
AD, perform an operational test of the engine fuel suction feed of
the fuel system, and perform all related testing, as applicable,
before further flight, according to a method approved by the
Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), FAA. One
approved method is the operational test in Section 28-22-00, titled
``Engine Fuel Feed System--Maintenance Practices,'' of the Boeing
737-300/400/500 Maintenance Manual (MM); and Boeing 737-300/400/500
Task Card B28-22-00-2B, titled ``Engine Fuel Suction Feed--
Operational Test,'' dated July 12, 2006. Repeat the operational test
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 7,500 flight hours.
Thereafter, except as provided in paragraph (g) of this AD, no
alternative procedure or repeat test intervals will be allowed.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g)(1) The Manager, Seattle ACO, FAA, ATTN: Sue Lucier,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Branch, ANM-140S, 1601 Lind Avenue
SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
(425) 917-6590, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 16, 2008.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
 [FR Doc. E8-12752 Filed 6-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P