[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 99 (Monday, May 23, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29649-29652]
[FR Doc No: 2011-12513]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0063; FRL-9309-3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Adoption of Control Techniques Guidelines for Paper,
Film, and Foil Surface Coating Processes

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (Pennsylvania). This SIP
revision includes amendments to Chapter 121--General Provisions and
Chapter 129--Standards for Sources, of Title 25 of the Pennsylvania
Code. Pennsylvania's SIP revision meets the requirement to adopt
Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for sources covered by
the Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) standards for paper, film, and
foil surface coating processes. EPA is approving this revision
concerning the adoption of the CTG requirements for paper, film, and
foil surface coating processes in accordance with the requirements of
the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: Effective Date: This final rule is effective on June 22, 2011.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA-R03-OAR-2011-0063. All documents in the docket are listed in
the http://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
electronic docket, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically through http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy for public inspection during normal
business hours at the Air Protection Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. Copies of the State submittal are available at the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Air
Quality Control, P.O. Box 8468, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg,
Pennsylvania 17105.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7511a(b)(2), requires that
States having moderate nonattainment areas for ozone revise their SIP
to include provisions requiring the implementation of RACT for certain
sources, including categories of volatile organic compound (VOC)
sources covered by a CTG document issued by the Administrator between
November 15, 1990 and the date of attainment. EPA originally developed
CTG standards for paper, film, and foil surface coating processes in
1977 and revised them in 2007. Pennsylvania subsequently made changes
to its SIP which adopted EPA's CTG standards for paper, film, and foil
surface coating processes. The formal SIP revision was submitted by
Pennsylvania to EPA on January 4, 2011. On March 4, 2011 (76 FR 11983),
EPA published a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) for Pennsylvania.
The NPR proposed approval of Pennsylvania's SIP revision for adoption
of the CTG standards for paper, film, and foil surface coating
processes. The formal SIP revision was submitted by Pennsylvania on
January 4, 2011. One adverse comment was submitted on the March 4, 2011
NPR (76 FR 11983). A summary of the comment and EPA's response is
provided in section III of this document.

II. Summary of SIP Revision

    On January 4, 2011, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection (PADEP) submitted to EPA a SIP revision concerning the
adoption of the EPA paper, film, and foil surface coating processes
CTG. EPA develops CTGs as

guidance on control requirements for source categories. States can
follow the CTGs or adopt more restrictive standards. Pennsylvania has
adopted EPA's CTG standards for paper, film, and foil surface coating
processes. Pennsylvania's regulations are in Chapter 121--General
Provisions and in Chapter 129--Standards for Sources, in Title 25 of
the Pennsylvania Code. Specifically, this revision amends the existing
regulations at sections 121.1, 129.51, and 129.52, and adds a new
section 129.52b. Several definitions were amended or added in section
121.1, and section 129.52 was amended to extend coverage to paper, film
and foil surface coating processes. The new section 129.52b includes
VOC emission limits, work practices, and recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, all of which are consistent with EPA's CTG for paper,
film, and foil surface coating processes. The requirements in section
129.52b supersede the requirements in 129.52 relating to control of VOC
emissions from paper, film, and foil surface coating processes. The
emission limits of VOCs for paper, film, and foil surface coatings are
shown in Table 1. These emission limits apply if potential VOC
emissions from a single line, prior to control, are 25 tons per year
(tpy) or more.

 Table 1--Recommended Emission Limits for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            RACT limits
                          ----------------------------------------------
                                                        Paper, film, and
                                                          foil surface
          Units                                           coating (not
                             Pressure sensitive tape       including
                            and label surface coating       pressure
                                                         sensitive tape
                                                           and label)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kilograms VOC/kilograms                     0.20            0.40
   solids (pounds VOC/
        pounds solids)
Kilograms VOC/kilograms                    0.067            0.08
  coating (pounds VOC/
       pounds coating)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, VOC emission limits for paper coatings only and the
associated applicability criteria that were in section 129.52(a)(2)
were added to section 129.52b in order to carry forward previously
regulated paper coating sources and to eliminate the potential for
backsliding. These VOC emission limits apply only to paper coatings if
actual VOC emissions have exceeded 3 pounds per hour, 15 pounds per
day, or 2.7 tpy in any year since January 1, 1987. The emission limits
are shown in Table 2.

           Table 2--Emission Limits of VOCs for Paper Coating
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          RACT limit for
                          Units                            paper coating
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pounds VOC/gallon coating solids........................            4.84
Kilogram VOC/liter coating solids.......................            0.58
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Other specific requirements concerning this rulemaking and the
rationale for EPA's action are explained in the NPR and the Technical
Support Document (TSD) and will not be restated here. As noted below,
EPA received one comment on the NPR and it was not germane.

III. Summary of Public Comment and EPA Response

    Comment: A commenter stated that ``it is a travesty that the EPA is
attempting to take action, in the name of the unproven theory of
anthropogenic global warming, through regulations that will harm the
economy of the United States,'' and asserts that EPA is attempting to
take such action on the issue of global warming which Congress has
``decided that no action was warranted.'' The commenter further states
that ``this is a blatant power grab by the EPA and the Obama
administration to force their radical liberal ideas on the hard-
working, decent people of the country without their consent.''
    Response: This comment is not relevant to this rulemaking action.
This action concerns the control of VOCs for the purpose of attaining
the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) and
does not concern the regulation of emissions for the purpose of
addressing global warming.

IV. Final Action

    EPA is approving Pennsylvania's adoption of the CTG requirements
for paper, film, and foil surface coating processes as a revision to
the Pennsylvania SIP.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible

methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the state, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 22, 2011. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action concerning Pennsylvania's adoption of a CTG for
paper, film, and foil surface coating processes may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.

    Dated: May 9, 2011.
W.C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart NN--Pennsylvania

0
2. In Sec.  52.2020, the table in paragraph (c)(1) is amended by
revising the entries for Sections 121.1, 129.51 and 129.52; and adding
an entry for Section 129.52b after the existing entry for Section
129.52. The amendments read as follows:

Sec.  52.2020  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (1) * * *

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Additional
        State citation              Title/subject          State        EPA approval date     explanation/Sec.
                                                      effective date                          52.2063 citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Title 25--Environmental Protection
                                           Article III--Air Resources
                                         Chapter 121--General Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 121.1.................  Definitions.........        11/20/10  5/23/11 [Insert page  Definition of
                                                                       number where the      ``coating line''
                                                                       document begins].     added. Revision of
                                                                                definitions for
                                                                                ``coating'' and
                                                                                ``paper coating.''

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                       Chapter 129--Standards for Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                 Sources of VOCs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
Section 129.51................  General.............        11/20/10  5/23/11 [Insert page  Paragraph 129.51(a)
                                                                       number where the      is amended.
                                                                       document begins].
Section 129.52................  Surface coating             11/20/10  5/23/11 [Insert page  Paragraph 129.52(j)
                                 processes.                            number where the      is added.
                                                                       document begins].
Section 129.52b...............  Control of VOC              11/20/10  5/23/11 [Insert page  New section is
                                 emissions from                        number where the      added.
                                 paper, film, and                      document begins].
                                 foil surface
                                 coating processes.

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2011-12513 Filed 5-20-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 196 (Wednesday, October 10, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50818-50820]
[FR Doc No: 2018-21508]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0855; Product Identifier 2018-NE-31-AD; Amendment
39-19416; AD 2018-19-16]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; CFM International S.A. Turbofan Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all CFM
International S.A. (CFM) LEAP-1A23, -1A24, -1A24E1, -1A26, -1A26E1, -
1A26CJ, -1A29, -1A29CJ, -1A30, -1A32, -1A33, -1A33B2, and -1A35A
turbofan engines with certain full authority digital engine control
(FADEC) and prognostic health monitoring (PHM) software installed. This
AD requires removing certain FADEC and PHM software and installing
versions eligible for installation. This AD was prompted by aborted
takeoffs after engines did not advance to the desired takeoff fan speed
due to icing in the pressure sensor line. We are issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective October 25, 2018.
    We must receive comments on this AD by November 26, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this final rule, contact CFM
International Inc., Aviation Operations Center, 1 Neumann Way, M/D Room
285, Cincinnati, OH 45125; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email: [email protected]. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also
available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-0855.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0855; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this final rule, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations (phone:
800-647-5527) is listed above. Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher McGuire, Aerospace
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We received reports of six aborted takeoffs that occurred after
engines did not advance to the desired takeoff fan speed. The aborted
takeoffs happened on the first takeoff of the day after the airplane
was exposed to sub-freezing temperatures for more than six hours. After
further investigation, the operator found water and ice in the pressure
sensor lines, which prevented the pressure sensor from accurately
measuring the pressure. As a result, CFM improved the FADEC and PHM
software to detect and accommodate pressure sensor line freezing. This
condition, if not addressed, could result in icing in the pressure
sensor lines and inaccurate pressure sensor readings, failure of one or
more engines, loss of thrust control, and loss of the airplane. We are
issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

Related Service Information

    We reviewed CFM Service Bulletin (SB) LEAP-1A-73-00-0027-01A-930A-
D, Issue 001, dated July 30, 2018. The SB introduces new FADEC and PHM
software and describes procedures for replacing the software.

FAA's Determination

    We are issuing this AD because we evaluated all the relevant
information and determined the unsafe condition described previously is
likely to exist or develop in other products of the same type design.

AD Requirements

    This AD requires removing certain FADEC and PHM software and
installing software that is eligible for installation.

Differences Between the AD and the Service Information

    CFM SB LEAP-1A-73-00-0027-01A-930A-D, Issue 001, dated July 30,
2018, recommends that you install the new FADEC and PHM software. This
AD requires that you install the new FADEC and PHM software, and
prohibits the use of earlier FADEC and PHM software versions.

Interim Action

    We consider this AD interim action. CFM is developing a
modification that will address the unsafe condition identified in this
AD. Once this modification is developed, approved, and available, we
might consider additional rulemaking.

FAA's Justification and Determination of the Effective Date

    An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to
adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public
justifies waiving notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule
because the compliance time for the required action is shorter than the
time necessary for the public to comment and for us to publish the
final rule. The software must be removed and replaced within 90 days to
ensure that icing does not develop in the pressure sensor lines on the
affected engines. Therefore, we find good cause that notice and
opportunity for prior public comment are impracticable. In addition,
for the reasons stated above, we find that good cause exists for making
this amendment effective in less than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for public
comment. However, we invite you to send any written data, views, or
arguments about this final rule. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include the docket number FAA-2018-
0855 and Product Identifier 2018-NE-31-AD at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this final rule. We will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
final rule because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this final rule.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 82 engines installed on airplanes
of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Software installation.................  1 work-hour x $85 per                 $0             $85          $6,970
                                         hour = $85.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs''
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to engines, propellers, and
associated appliances to the Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards
Branch, Policy and Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2018-19-16 CFM International S.A.: Amendment 39-19416; Docket No.
FAA-2018-0855; Product Identifier 2018-NE-31-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective October 25, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all CFM LEAP-1A23, -1A24, -1A24E1, -1A26, -
1A26E1, -1A26CJ, -1A29, -1A29CJ, -1A30, -1A32, -1A33, -1A33B2, and -
1A35A turbofan engines with full authority digital engine control
(FADEC) software, part number (P/N) 2590M00P07, version L1A0510, or
earlier, installed; and prognostic health monitoring (PHM) software,
P/N 2784M64P01, version PL1A0510, or earlier, installed.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7600, Engine
Controls.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by aborted takeoffs after engines did not
advance to the desired takeoff fan speed due to icing in the
pressure sensor line. We are issuing this AD to prevent icing in the
pressure sensor lines and inaccurate pressure sensor readings. The
unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result failure of one or
more engines, loss of thrust control, and loss of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    (1) Within 90 days after the effective date of this AD, remove
FADEC software, P/N 2590M00P07, version L1A0510, or earlier; and PHM
software, P/N 2784M64P01, version PL1A0510, or earlier, from the
engine.
    (2) Before further flight after the removal of the FADEC and PHM
software required by paragraph (g)(1), install FADEC and PHM
software that is eligible for installation.

(h) Installation Prohibition

    After 90 days from the effective date of this AD, do not operate
any engine with FADEC software, P/N 2590M00P07, version L1A0510, or
earlier, installed; and PHM software, P/N 2784M64P01, version
PL1A0510, or earlier, installed.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, ECO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. You may email your request
to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Christopher McGuire,
Aerospace Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    None.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on September 27, 2018.
Robert J. Ganley,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Standards Branch, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-21508 Filed 10-9-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P