[Federal Register: April 6, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 64)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 15417-15419]
[DOCID:fr06ap09-22]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0125]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Paradise Point Fourth of July Fireworks; Mission
Bay, San Diego, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes establishing a temporary safety zone
on the navigable waters of Mission Bay in support of the Paradise Point
Fourth of July Fireworks. This temporary safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of crew, spectators, and other users and vessels
of the waterway. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within this temporary safety zone
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his designated
representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must either be submitted to our
online docket via http://www.regulations.gov on or before May 6, 2009
or reach the Docket Management Facility by that date.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2009-0125 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    (4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    To avoid duplication, please use only one of these methods. For
instructions on submitting comments, see the ``Public Participation and
Request for Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Petty Officer Kristen Beer, USCG, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego at<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you have questions
on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2009-0125), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert ``USCG-2009-0125'' in the Docket ID box, press Enter,
and then click on the balloon shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the

right side of the screen, insert USCG-2009-0125 in the Docket ID box,
press Enter, and then click on the item in the Docket ID column. You
may also visit either the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on
the ground floor of the Department of Transportation West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays; or the U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Dr., San Diego, CA 92101 between
8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We
have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the
Docket Management Facility.

Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    The Paradise Point Resort is sponsoring the Paradise Point Resort
Fourth of July Fireworks, which will include a fireworks presentation
originating from a barge located at approximately 32[deg]46.36[min] N,
117[deg]14.57[min] W. The safety zone will encompass all navigable
waters within 600 feet of the fireworks barge. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, spectators,
and other users and vessels of the waterway.

Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes establishing a safety zone that will be
enforced from 8:45 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on July 3, 2009. This safety zone
is necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, spectators, and
other users and vessels of the waterway. Persons and vessels will be
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port or his
designated representative. The limits of the safety zone are all
navigable waters within 600 feet of the fireworks barge located at
approximately 32[deg]46.36[min] N, 117[deg]14.57[min] W.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. This determination is
based on the size and location of the safety zone. Commercial vessels
will not be hindered by the safety zone. Recreational vessels will not
be allowed to transit through the established safety zone during the
specified times unless authorized to do so by the Captain of the Port
or his designated representative.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
    This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: the owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in a portion of Mission Bay from 8:45
p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on July 3, 2009.
    This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule would be in effect for only 45 minutes late in the evening when
vessel traffic is low. Vessel traffic could pass safely around the
safety zone. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will publish
a local notice to mariners (LNM) and will issue broadcast notice to
mariners (BNM) alerts via marine channel 16 VHF before the temporary
safety zone is enforced.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Petty Officer Kristen Beer,
USCG, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619)
278-7262. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise

have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have Tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies. This proposed rule does not use technical standards.
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination this action is one of a category
of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. An environmental analysis checklist
supporting this preliminary determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

    1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5;
Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.

    2. Add a new temporary zone Sec.  165.T11-162 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T11-162  Safety Zone; Paradise Point Resort Fourth of July
Fireworks; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA.

    (a) Location. The limits of the safety zone are all the navigable
waters within 600 feet of the fireworks barge located at approximately
32[deg]46.36' N, 117[deg]14.57' W.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 8:45
p.m. to 9:30 p.m. on July 3, 2009. If the event concludes prior to the
scheduled termination time, the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
    (c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, and local, State, and Federal law enforcement vessels who
have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
    (d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety
zone may request authorization to do so from the Patrol Commander
(PATCOM). The PATCOM may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
    (4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
    (5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, State, or
local agencies.

    Dated: March 16, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
 [FR Doc. E9-7659 Filed 4-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-15-P


[Federal Register: August 26, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 164)]
[Notices]
[Page 43214]
[DOCID:fr26au09-140]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Intent To Rule on Request To Release Airport Property
at Walnut Ridge Regional Airport, Walnut Ridge, AR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) DOT.

ACTION: Notice of Request To Release Airport Property.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to rule and invites public comment on the
release of land at Walnut Ridge Regional Airport under the provisions
of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(c).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 25, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this application may be mailed or delivered to
the FAA at the following address: Mr. Edward N. Agnew, Manager, Federal
Aviation Administration, Southwest Region, Airports Division, Arkansas/
Oklahoma Airports Development Office, ASW-630, 2601 Meacham Boulevard,
Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to The Honorable Michelle Rogers, Mayor of Walnut
Ridge, at the following address: City of Walnut Ridge, 300 West Main
Street, Walnut Ridge, AR 72476.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Paul Burns, Federal Aviation
Administration, Airports Development Office, ASW-630, 2601 Meacham
Boulevard, Fort Worth, Texas 76137.
    The request to release property may be reviewed in person at this
same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA invites public comment on the
request to release property at the Walnut Ridge Regional Airport.
    On August 10, 2009, the FAA determined that the request to release
property at Walnut Ridge Regional Airport submitted by the City of
Walnut Ridge met the procedural requirements of the Federal Aviation
Regulations, Part 155. The FAA may approve the request, in whole or in
part, no later than September 25, 2009.
    The following is a brief overview of the request: The City of
Walnut Ridge requests the release of 17.6 acres of airport property.
The land proposed for release will be used by Williams Baptist College
to expand its existing college campus adjacent to the Walnut Ridge
Regional Airport. The fair market value of this land is $53,000.00. In
exchange for this 17.6 acres, the Airport will receive from Williams
Baptist College a 20.0-acre tract valued at $40,000.00 plus a cash
payment in the amount of $13,000.00. The City will use this $13,000.00
(together with $30,000.00 from another airport land release, resulting
in a total of $43,000.00) on a 2010 capital improvement project to
construct a Maintenance Hangar at Walnut Ridge Regional Airport.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the application,
notice and other documents germane to the application in person at the
Walnut Ridge Regional Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on August 14, 2009.
Kelvin L. Solco,
Manager, Airports Division.
[FR Doc. E9-20317 Filed 8-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-M


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 115 (Friday, June 14, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 35756]
[FR Doc No: 2013-14117]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[USCG-2013-0425]

Drawbridge Operation Regulations; Harlem River, New York City, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of temporary deviation from regulations.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commander, First Coast Guard District, has issued a
temporary deviation from the regulation governing the operation of the
Willis Avenue Bridge across the Harlem River, mile 1.5, at the Bronx,
New York. The deviation is necessary to facilitate electrical repairs
at the bridge. Under this temporary deviation, the bridge may remain in
the closed position for four weeks to facilitate scheduled repairs.

DATES: This deviation is effective from June 17, 2013 through July 12,
2013.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, [USCG-2013-0425] is available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation. You may also visit the Docket
Management Facility in Room W12-140, on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email Mr. Joe Arca, Project Officer, First
Coast Guard District<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER>. If you
have questions on viewing the docket, call Barbara Hairston, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Willis Avenue Bridge has a vertical
clearance of 24 feet at mean high water and 30 feet at mean low water
in the closed position. The existing drawbridge operating regulations
are found at 33 CFR 117.789(b)(2).
    The bridge owner, New York City Department of Transportation,
requested a four week closure from June 17, 2013 through July 12, 2013,
to facilitate electrical repairs at the bridge.
    The waterway users are commercial tug and barge traffic as well as
various sized recreational craft. Local facilities were advised of the
closures with no objections received.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the bridge must return to its
regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the designated
repair period. This deviation from the operating regulations is
authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: June 5, 2013.
Gary Kassof,
Bridge Program Manager, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013-14117 Filed 6-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 56354-56355]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22398]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER14-2798-000]

Beech Ridge Energy II LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding,
of Beech Ridge Energy II LLC's application for market-based rate
authority, with an accompanying rate schedule, noting that such
application includes a request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214

of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability is October 2, 2014.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding(s) are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-22398 Filed 9-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 30 (Tuesday, February 13, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6280-6281]
[FR Doc No: 2018-02859]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-82648; File No. SR-CBOE-2018-015]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Fees Schedule Concerning the Floor Broker SPX Surcharge

February 7, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 1, 2018, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its monthly fee of $3,000 per month
for any Floor Broker Trading Permit Holder (``TPH'') that executes more
than 20,000 SPX (including SPXW) contracts during the month (``FB SPX
Surcharge''). Particularly, the Exchange proposes to adopt an exclusion
for Multi-Class Broad-Based Index Option Spread Orders (``Multi-Class
Spread Orders'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its monthly fee of $3,000 per month
for any Floor Broker Trading Permit Holder (``TPH'') that executes more
than 20,000 SPX (including SPXW) contracts during the month (``FB SPX
Surcharge''). Particularly, the Exchange proposes to adopt an exclusion
for Multi-Class Broad-Based Index Option Spread Orders (``Multi-Class
Spread Orders'').
    By way of background, Cboe Options Rule 24.19 permits the execution
of Multi-Class Spread Orders, which are generally defined as orders to
buy a stated number of contracts of a broad-based index option or
exchange-traded fund (``ETF'')/exchange-traded note (``ETN'') option
derived from a broad-based index and to sell an equal number, or an
equivalent number of contracts of a different broad-based index option
or ETF/ETN option derived from a broad-based index. These orders may be
represented at the trading station of either option involved, subject
to the conditions in Rule 24.19.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Cboe Options Rule 24.19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FB SPX Surcharge was not enacted with the intention of
assessing it to Floor Brokers to whom it would only apply due to their
execution of Multi-Class Spread Orders that included an SPX component.
Rather, the surcharge was intended to be assessed on Floor Brokers that
regularly execute SPX trades in the SPX trading crowd. In order to
avoid being assessed the FB SPX Surcharge as a result of the execution
of Multi-Class Spread Orders with an SPX component, the Exchange
proposes to provide that Floor Brokers to which the FB SPX Surcharge is
not otherwise applicable will not be assessed the FB SPX Surcharge if
they only execute SPX open outcry transactions as part of a Multi-Class
Spread Order. In order to identify those instances, the Exchange is
proposing to require that Floor Brokers submit the Floor Broker SPX
Surcharge Exclusion for Multi-Class Broad-Based Index Spread
Transactions Form (the ``Form'') within three business days of
execution of the applicable spread transaction(s).
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\4\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \5\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ which requires that Exchange rules
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is reasonable
because it allows Floor Brokers to whom the FB SPX Surcharge would
apply only due to their execution of Multi-Class Spread Orders with an
SPX component to avoid having to pay the surcharge. The proposed rule
change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because the

FB SPX Surcharge is intended to be assessed on those Floor Brokers who
regularly conduct open outcry transactions in SPX or SPX Weeklys (i.e.,
Floor Brokers who are engaging in regular SPX trades), since those
Floor Brokers are engaging in transactions for which executing SPX
trades is the primary purpose of such transactions (or are signing up
to do so). Floor Brokers who only engage in SPX transactions through
the execution of Multi-Class Spread Orders with an SPX component are
not engaging in such transactions with primary purpose of executing an
SPX order, but instead are just executing an SPX order as part of a
larger Multi-Class Spread Order. Additionally, all Floor Brokers who
only engage in SPX transactions through the execution of Multi-Class
Spread Orders with an SPX component will have the opportunity to be
excluded from the FB SPX Surcharge.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burdens on competition that are not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act, because the proposed rule change provides Floor
Brokers not engaged in regular SPX trades with an opportunity to be
excluded from the FB SPX Surcharge, which is intended to be assessed on
those Floor Brokers who engage in transactions for which executing SPX
trades is the primary purpose of such transactions (or are signing up
to do so). The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes
will impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not necessary
or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the
proposed rule change only affects trading on the Exchange's trading
floor. To the extent that the proposed changes make Cboe Options a more
attractive marketplace for market participants at other exchanges, such
market participants are welcome to become Cboe Options market
participants.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \8\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2018-015 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2018-015. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2018-015 and should be submitted on
or before March 6, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-02859 Filed 2-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 38 (Monday, February 27, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 12445]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04080]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

UNIFIED CARRIER REGISTRATION PLAN

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: March 2, 2023, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Eastern time.

PLACE: This meeting will take place at the Sheraton Virginia Beach
Oceanfront, 3501 Atlantic Avenue, Virginia Beach, VA 23451. The meeting
will also be accessible via conference call and via Zoom Meeting and
Screenshare. Any interested person may call (i) 1-929-205-6099 (US
Toll) or 1-669-900-6833 (US Toll), Meeting ID: 915 0493 1016, to listen
and participate in this meeting. The website to participate via Zoom
Meeting and Screenshare is https://kellen.zoom.us/meeting/register/tJUod-2hrToqG9IKX1BM_YbB6S5vEnGZwCNk.

STATUS: This meeting will be open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: The Unified Carrier Registration Plan
Enforcement Subcommittee (the ``Subcommittee'') will continue its work
in developing and implementing the Unified Carrier Registration Plan
and Agreement. The subject matter of this meeting will include:

Proposed Agenda

I. Call to Order--UCR Enforcement Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will welcome attendees, call the meeting to
order, call roll for the Subcommittee, confirm whether a quorum is
present, and facilitate self-introductions.
II. Verification of Publication of Meeting Notice--UCR Executive
Director
    The UCR Executive Director will verify the publication of the
meeting notice on the UCR website and distribution to the UCR contact
list via email followed by the subsequent publication of the notice in
the Federal Register.
III. Review and Approval of Subcommittee Agenda and Setting of Ground
Rules--UCR Enforcement Subcommittee Chair
    For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee Agenda will be reviewed, and the Subcommittee will
consider adoption.
Ground Rules
    [rtarr8] Subcommittee action only to be taken in designated areas
on agenda
IV. Mission of the Subcommittee--UCR Enforcement Subcommittee Chair
    For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The UCR Enforcement Subcommittee Chair will lead discussion to
establish a mission statement of the Subcommittee. The Subcommittee may
consider and take action to establish a mission statement.
V. Subcommittee Goals and Responsibilities--UCR Enforcement
Subcommittee Chair
    For Discussion and Possible Subcommittee Action
    The Subcommittee will discuss the establishment of goals and
responsibilities for the Subcommittee. The Subcommittee may consider
and take action to establish goals and responsibilities for the
Subcommittee.
VI. Review and Discussion of 2022 Enforcement Activities--UCR
Enforcement Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee will review tools and activities undertaken in
2022 to conduct enforcement activities.
VII. NRS Tools--UCR Enforcement Subcommittee Chair, Seikosoft
Representative, DSL Transportation Services, Inc.
    The Subcommittee Chair, Seikosoft Representative, and DSL
Transportation Services, Inc., will review various tools and reports
available in the NRS system that are available to support enforcement
activities. As part of this review, the Subcommittee will also look at
the current enforcement portal and discuss whether, at this time, there
are additional features the Subcommittee would like the enforcement
portal to contain.
VIII. Discussion of Data Sources Currently Available to States and
Other Helpful Sources--UCR Enforcement Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee will identify key tools and sources of UCR data
available to states, the differences in availability of these sources
between states, and collect information on what would be helpful to
provide.
IX. Discussion of Should-Have-Beens--UCR Enforcement Subcommittee
Chair, DSL Transportation Services, Inc.
    The Subcommittee Chair will review discussions from previous UCR
Subcommittee and UCR Board of Directors Meetings regarding the use of
Should-Have-Beens (SHBs).
X. Training--UCR Enforcement Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will discuss training opportunities for the
Subcommittee and those providing enforcement services for the UCR Plan.
XI. Other Business--UCR Enforcement Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will call for any other items Subcommittee
members would like to discuss.
XII. Adjournment--UCR Enforcement Subcommittee Chair
    The Subcommittee Chair will adjourn the meeting.
    The agenda will be available no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern time,
February 23, 2023 at: https://plan.ucr.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Elizabeth Leaman, Chair, Unified
Carrier Registration Plan Board of Directors,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

Alex B. Leath,
Chief Legal Officer, Unified Carrier Registration Plan.
[FR Doc. 2023-04080 Filed 2-23-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-YL-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 134 (Friday, July 12, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 33189-33191]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14878]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0524; Product Identifier 2019-NM-081-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain The Boeing Company Model 747-400 and 747-400F series
airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by an evaluation that
determined fatigue cracks could develop in the underwing longerons.
This proposed AD would require repetitive inspections of the underwing
longerons and certain fuselage skins for any crack, and applicable on-
condition actions. The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 26,
2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this NPRM, contact Boeing
Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services (C&DS),
2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-5600;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may
view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It
is also available on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0524.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2019-
0524; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eric Lin, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2019-0524;
Product Identifier 2019-NM-081-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The FAA specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this NPRM. The FAA will
consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend this
NPRM because of those comments.
    The FAA will post all comments received, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide.
The FAA will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The FAA received reports of fatigue cracks in the underwing
longerons of multiple Model 777 airplanes. A cross-model evaluation
determined that Model 747-400 and 747-400F series airplanes are subject
to the same unsafe condition. (The FAA issued a similar AD [AD 2017-16-
10, Amendment 39-18987 (82 FR 39513, August 21, 2017)] for Model 777
airplanes.) The cracks initiate at the forward fastener row joining the
longeron to the wing lower surface. Cracking of the forward fuselage
skins was also found. Model 747-400 line numbers 1308, 1313, and 1315
through 1419 inclusive, have a similar one-piece machined design and
similar stress levels as those on the Model 777 underwing longerons;
however, no cracks have been reported on the Model 747-400 one-piece
longerons. Cracking in an underwing longeron, if not addressed, could
result in fuel leakage into the pressurized fuselage and increase the
risk of a fire. Cracking in the adjacent fuselage skin could result in
rapid decompression. Either condition could adversely affect the
structural integrity of the airplane.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 747-53A2900 RB,
dated April 11, 2019. The service information describes procedures for
repetitive detailed inspections and ultrasonic inspections of the
underwing longerons and the adjacent fuselage skin, and ultrasonic and
surface high frequency eddy current (HFEC) inspections of certain
fuselage skins, on the left and right sides of the airplane, for any
crack, and applicable on-condition actions. On-condition actions
include repair.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    The FAA is proposing this AD because the agency evaluated all the
relevant information and determined the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop in other products of the same
type design.

Proposed AD Requirements

    This proposed AD would require accomplishment of the actions
identified in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 747-53A2900 RB, dated
April 11, 2019, described previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
    For information on the procedures and compliance times, see this
service information at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2019-0524.

Costs of Compliance

    The AD estimates that this proposed AD affects 20 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this
proposed AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
              Action                    Labor cost        Parts cost      Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Detailed inspections of the        2 work-hours x $85               $0  $170 per inspection  $3,400 per
 underwing longerons.               per hour = $170                      cycle.               inspection cycle.
                                    per inspection
                                    cycle.
Ultrasonic and HFEC inspections    9 work-hours x $85                0  $765 per inspection  $15,300 per
 of the adjacent fuselage skin.     per hour = $765                      cycle.               inspection cycle.
                                    per inspection
                                    cycle.
Ultrasonic inspections of the      2 work-hours x $85                0  $170 per inspection  $3,400 per
 underwing longerons.               per hour = $170                      cycle.               inspection cycle.
                                    per inspection
                                    cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data that would enable us to
provide cost estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this
proposed AD.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This proposed AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated
by the Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as
authorized by FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order,
issuance of ADs is normally a function of the Compliance and
Airworthiness Division, but during this transition period, the
Executive Director has delegated the authority to issue ADs applicable
to transport category airplanes and associated appliances to the
Director of the System Oversight Division.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator,

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

The Boeing Company: Docket No. FAA-2019-0524; Product Identifier
2019-NM-081-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments by August 26, 2019.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 747-400 and 747-400F
series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 747-53A2900 RB, dated April 11,
2019.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by an evaluation that determined fatigue
cracks could develop in the underwing longerons. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address cracks in the underwing longerons, which could
result in fuel leakage into the pressurized fuselage and increase
the risk of a fire, and to address cracks in the adjacent fuselage
skin, which could result in rapid decompression. Either condition
could adversely affect the structural integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    Except as specified by paragraph (h) of this AD: At the
applicable times specified in the ``Compliance'' paragraph of Boeing
Alert Requirements Bulletin 747-53A2900 RB, dated April 11, 2019, do
all applicable actions identified in, and in accordance with, the
Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin
747-53A2900 RB, dated April 11, 2019.

    Note 1 to paragraph (g):  Guidance for accomplishing the actions
required by this AD can be found in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
747-53A2900, dated April 11, 2019, which is referred to in Boeing
Alert Requirements Bulletin 747-53A2900 RB, dated April 11, 2019.

(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) For purposes of determining compliance with the requirements
of this AD: Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 747-53A2900 RB,
dated April 11, 2019, uses the phrase ``the original issue date of
Requirements Bulletin 747-53A2900 RB,'' this AD requires using ``the
effective date of this AD.''
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin 747-53A2900 RB,
dated April 11, 2019, specifies contacting Boeing for repair
instructions: This AD requires doing the repair using a method
approved in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph
(i) of this AD.

(i) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District
Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the
manager of the certification office, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (j)(1) of this AD. Information may be
exception occurred on : 2019-14878.htm
exception occurred on : 2019-14878.htm
emailed to: 9-ANM-Seattle-ACO-AMOC-Reque[email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the Manager, Seattle
ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be approved, the repair
method, modification deviation, or alteration deviation must meet
the certification basis of the airplane, and the approval must
specifically refer to this AD.

(j) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Eric Lin,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Des Moines, Washington, on July 2, 2019.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Director, System Oversight Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-14878 Filed 7-11-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P