[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82-84]
[FR Doc No: 2019-00020]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP18-923-002.
    Applicants: Enable Mississippi River Transmission, L.
    Description: Compliance filing MRT Compliance Filing RP18-923 to be
effective 1/1/2019.

    Filed Date: 12/17/18.
    Accession Number: 20181217-5289.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 01/04/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-511-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Update (Conoco Secondary) to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5000.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-512-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--Wells Fargo
Deal ID 951831 to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5017.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-513-000.
    Applicants: NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--EAP Ohio
releases to Chesapeake to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5038.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-514-000.
    Applicants: NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: NegRates--Chesapeake Releases
contracts 960039 & 960040 to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5041.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-515-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Modernization II Base Rate
Reset to be effective 2/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5069.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-516-000.
    Applicants: NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Chesapeake
FT1 Releases to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5070.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-517-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: CCRM 2019 to be effective 2/1/
2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5071.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-517-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: CCRM 2019 to be effective 2/1/
2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-518-000.
    Applicants: Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Measurement Tariff Changes to
be effective 2/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5074.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-519-000.
    Applicants: Millennium Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing 2018 Penalty Revenue Crediting
Report to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5076.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-520-000.
    Applicants: Texas Eastern Transmission, LP.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate--Sempra 911550
eff 1-1-19 to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5077.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-521-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Neg Rate 2018-12-31 E2W (9) to
be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-522-000.
    Applicants: Rockies Express Pipeline LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Neg Rate 2018-12-31 Encana to
be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5096.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-523-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Filing-EOG Resources, Inc. to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5097.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-524-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Cherokee
AGL--Replacement Shippers--Jan 2019 to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-525-000.
    Applicants: NEXUS Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rates--Columbia
860005 Releases eff 1-1-19 to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5101.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-526-000.
    Applicants: Trailblazer Pipeline Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Neg Rate 2018-12-28-2018 GP
Trade, Citadel, Mieco & MS to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-527-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Negotiated Rate Agreement
Filing--Lucid Energy Delaware to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5131.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-528-000.
    Applicants: Greylock Pipeline, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing Settlement rates 2019 to be
effective 3/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5180.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-529-000.
    Applicants: Northern Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: 20181231 Negotiated Rates to
be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5233.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    Docket Numbers: RP19-530-000.
    Applicants: Gas Transmission Northwest LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: GTN Neg Rate Amendments Filing
for 501-G to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 12/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181231-5236.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/14/19.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings

must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern
time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but
intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 2, 2019.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-00020 Filed 1-7-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 82 (Tuesday, April 29, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23900-23903]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09623]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0233; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-053-AD;
Amendment 39-17825; AD 2014-08-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-03-08 for
all Airbus Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series airplanes. AD 2014-
03-08 required an inspection to determine the part number of the
interconnecting struts installed on the wings, identifying the part
number and the serial number of the associated target and proximity
sensor if applicable, and replacing or re-identifying the flap
interconnecting strut if applicable. This new AD corrects a
typographical error that affects the definition of a serviceable
interconnecting strut. This AD was prompted by a report that an
investigation showed that when a certain combination of a target/
proximity sensor serial number is installed on a flap interconnecting
strut, a ``target FAR'' signal cannot be detected when it reaches the
mechanical end stop of the interconnecting strut. We are issuing this
AD to detect and correct a latent failure of the flap down drive
disconnection due to an already-failed interconnecting strut sensor,
which could result in asymmetric flap panel movement and consequent
loss of control of the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective May 14, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 26,
2014 (79 FR 9398, February 19, 2014).
    We must receive comments on this AD by June 13, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus,
Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0233; or in person at the Docket Operations office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM 116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    On January 22, 2014, we issued AD 2014-03-08, Amendment 39-17745
(79 FR 9398, February 19, 2014). AD 2014-03-08 applied to all Airbus
Model A318, A319, A320, and A321 series

airplanes. AD 2014-03-08 was prompted by a report that an investigation
showed that when a certain combination of a target/proximity sensor
serial number is installed on a flap interconnecting strut, a ``target
FAR'' signal cannot be detected when it reaches the mechanical end stop
of the interconnecting strut. AD 2014-03-08 required an inspection to
determine the part number of the interconnecting struts installed on
the wings, identifying the part number and the serial number of the
associated target and proximity sensor if applicable, and replacing or
re-identifying the flap interconnecting strut if applicable. We issued
AD 2014-03-08 to detect and correct a latent failure of the flap down
drive disconnection due to an already-failed interconnecting strut
sensor, which could result in asymmetric flap panel movement and
consequent loss of control of the airplane.
    Since we issued AD 2014-03-08, Amendment 39-17745 (79 FR 9398,
February 19, 2014), we identified a typographical error that affects
the definition of a serviceable interconnecting strut.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are issuing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined the unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

FAA's Determination of the Effective Date

    This new AD merely corrects a typographical error that affects the
definition of a serviceable interconnecting strut. The requirements of
this AD are substantially similar to the requirements of superseded AD
2014-03-08, Amendment 39-17745, (79 FR 9398, February 19, 2014).
Therefore, we find that notice and opportunity for prior public comment
are unnecessary and that good cause exists for making this amendment
effective in less than 30 days.

Comments Invited

    This AD is a final rule that involves requirements affecting flight
safety, and we did not precede it by notice and opportunity for public
comment. We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this AD. Send your comments to an address listed under
the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2014-0233; Directorate
Identifier 2014-NM-053-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend this AD because of
those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 755 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    The actions that were required by AD 2014-03-08, Amendment 39-17745
(79 FR 9398, February 19, 2014), and are retained in this AD take about
8 work-hours per product, at an average labor rate of $85 per work-
hour. Required parts cost about $0 per product. Based on these figures,
the estimated cost of the actions that were required by AD 2014-03-08
is $680 per product.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions would
take about 10 work-hours and require parts costing $0, for a cost of
$850 per product. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft
that might need this action.
    The new requirements of this AD add no additional economic burden.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing airworthiness directive (AD)
2014-03-08, Amendment 39-17745 (79 FR 9398, February 19, 2014), and
adding the following new AD:

2014-08-01 Airbus: Amendment 39-17825. Docket No. FAA-2014-0233;
Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-053-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective May 14, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2014-03-08, Amendment 39-17745 (79 FR
9398, February 19, 2014).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus Model A318-111, -112, -121, and -
122 airplanes; Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132,
and -133 airplanes; Model A320-111, -211, -212, -214, -231, -232,
and -233 airplanes; and Model A321-111, -112, -131,

-211, -212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes; certificated in any
category; all manufacturer serial numbers.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 27, Flight
controls.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by a report that an investigation showed
that when a certain combination of a target/proximity sensor serial
number is installed on a flap interconnecting strut, a ``target
FAR'' signal cannot be detected when reaching the mechanical end
stop of the interconnecting strut. We are issuing this AD to detect
and correct a latent failure of the flap down drive disconnection
due to an already-failed interconnecting strut sensor, which could
result in asymmetric flap panel movement and consequent loss of
control of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Inspection To Determine the Part Number of the
Interconnecting Struts

    This paragraph restates the requirements of AD 2014-03-08,
Amendment 39-17745 (79 FR 9398, February 19, 2014), with a corrected
typographical error in paragraph (g)(2)(i) of this AD that affects
the definition of a serviceable interconnecting strut. Within 8,000
flight hours after March 26, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2014 03-
08), inspect to determine the part number of the interconnecting
struts installed on both the left-hand (LH) and right-hand (RH)
wings of the airplane, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1206, Revision 01,
dated October 10, 2011. A review of the airplane maintenance records
is acceptable for determining the part number of the installed
interconnecting struts, in lieu of the inspection, if the part
number of the installed interconnecting struts, and the part number
and the serial number of the associated target and proximity sensor,
can be conclusively determined from that review.
    (1) Airplanes on which Airbus Modification 27956 has been
embodied in production, and on which no interconnecting strut has
been replaced with a strut having a part number specified in figure
1 to paragraph (g) of this AD since the airplane's first flight: No
further work is required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (2) If, during the inspection required by the introductory text
of paragraph (g) of this AD, any interconnecting strut is installed
with a part number specified in figure 1 to paragraph (g) of this
AD: Within 8,000 flight hours after March 26, 2014 (the effective
date of AD 2014 03-08, Amendment 39-17745 (79 FR 9398, February 19,
2014)), determine the part number and the serial number of the
associated target and proximity sensor.
    (i) For airplanes having conditions specified in paragraphs
(g)(2)(i)(A), (g)(2)(i)(B), (g)(2)(i)(C), and (g)(2)(i)(D) of this
AD: Before further flight, replace the interconnecting strut with a
serviceable unit, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1206, Revision 01, dated October
10, 2011. For the purposes of this AD, a serviceable interconnecting
strut is a unit which has been determined to be in compliance with
the requirements of this AD.
    (A) A target part number (P/N) ABS0121-13 or P/N 8-536-01; and
    (B) A target serial number lower than 1600, or a target serial
number that is unreadable; and
    (C) A proximity sensor having P/N ABS0121-31 or P/N 8-372-04;
and
    (D) A proximity sensor having a serial number between C59198 and
C59435, or a serial number (S/N) C500000 or higher.
    (ii) For a target having S/N 1600 or higher and target P/N
ABS0121-13 or P/N 8-536-01: Within 8,000 flight hours after March
26, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2014 03-08, Amendment 39-17745
(79 FR 9398, February 19, 2014), re-identify the interconnecting
strut, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Airbus
Service Bulletin A320-27-1206, Revision 01, dated October 10, 2011.

  Figure 1 to Paragraph (g) of This AD--Interconnecting Strut Part Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     Interconnecting strut part Nos.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             D5757030500000
                             D5757030500100
                             D5757030500200
                             D5757030500600
                             D5757030500800
                             D5757030501000
                             D5757030501200
                             D5757032200000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

 (h) Retained Parts Installation Prohibition

    This paragraph restates the requirements of AD 2014-03-08,
Amendment 39-17745 (79 FR 9398, February 19, 2014). As of March 26,
2014 (the effective date of AD 2014 03-08), no person may install an
interconnecting strut with a part number specified in figure 1 to
paragraph (g) of this AD, on any airplane, except for parts
identified in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) of this AD, provided that the
actions in paragraph (g)(2)(ii) are done.

(i) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before
March 26, 2014 (the effective date of AD 2014 03-08, Amendment 39-
17745 (79 FR 9398, February 19, 2014)), using Airbus Service
Bulletin A320-27-1206, dated January 28, 2011, and if additional
work has been accomplished using Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-
1206, Revision 01, dated October 10, 2011. Airbus Service Bulletin
A320-27-1206, dated January 28, 2011, is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Sanjay
Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may
be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or its delegated agent, or the DAH with a State of Design
Authority's design organization approval, as applicable). You are
required to assure the product is airworthy before it is returned to
service.

(k) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) European Aviation Safety Agency Airworthiness Directive 2012-
0012, dated January 23, 2012, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0233.
    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference may be obtained at the addresses specified
in paragraphs (l)(4) and (l)(5) of this AD.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
March 26, 2014 (79 FR 9398, February 19, 2014).
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A320-27-1206, Revision 01, dated
October 10, 2011.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus, Airworthiness Office--EAS, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte,
31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5
61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (5) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.

    (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 7, 2014.
John P. Piccola,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-09623 Filed 4-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: July 17, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 136)]
[Notices]
[Page 40557-40558]
[DOCID:fr17jy06-113]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon written request, copies available from: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549.

Extension:
    Rule 17a-25; SEC File No. 270-482; OMB Control No. 3235-0540.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Rule 17a-25 (17 CFR 240.17a-25) requires registered broker-dealers
to electronically submit securities transaction information, including
identifiers for prime brokerage arrangements, average price accounts,
and depository institutions, in a standardized format when requested by
the Commission staff. In addition, the rule also requires broker-
dealers to submit, and keep current, contact person information for
electronic blue sheets (``EBS'') requests. The Commission uses the
information for

enforcement inquiries or investigations and trading reconstructions, as
well as for inspections and examinations.
    The Commission estimates that it sends approximately 27,000
electronic blue sheet requests per year. Accordingly, the annual
aggregate hour burden for electronic and manual response firms is
estimated to be 3,564 hours and 405 hours, respectively. In addition,
the Commission estimates that it will request 1,400 broker-dealers to
supply the contact information identified in Rule 17a-25(c) and
estimates the total aggregate burden hours to be 350. Thus, the annual
aggregate burden for all respondents to the collection of information
requirements of Rule 17a-25 is estimated at 4,319 hours.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    Comments should be directed to (i) the Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New
Executive Office Building, Washington, DC, 20503 or by sending an e-
mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/
Chief Information Office, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O
Shirley Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312
or send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted
to OMB within 60 days of this notice.

    Dated: July 10, 2006.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-11232 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 104 (Wednesday, May 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 31899]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13151]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Thursday, May 31,
2012 at 2:00 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of the
scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Walter, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Thursday,
May 31, 2012 will be:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings; and
Other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.

    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 24, 2012.
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-13151 Filed 5-25-12; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 156 (Monday, August 13, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 39975-39978]
[FR Doc No: 2018-17206]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R04-RCRA-2018-0255; FRL- 9981-48--Region 4]

Georgia: Proposed Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Georgia has applied to the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) for final authorization of changes to its hazardous waste program
under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended.
EPA has reviewed Georgia's application and has determined that these
changes satisfy all requirements needed to qualify for final
authorization. Therefore, we are proposing to authorize the state's
changes. EPA seeks public comment prior to taking final action.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 12, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
RCRA-2018-0255, at http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from www.regulations.gov. EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thornell Cheeks, Materials and Waste
Management Branch, RCR Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-
8960; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>: fax

number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

A. Why are revisions to state programs necessary?

    States that have received final authorization from EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous waste
program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes, states must
change their programs and ask EPA to authorize the changes. Changes to
state programs may be necessary when Federal or state statutory or
regulatory authority is modified or when certain other changes occur.
Most commonly, states must change their programs because of changes to
EPA's regulations in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 124,
260 through 268, 270, 273, and 279.
    New Federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that EPA promulgates pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA) take effect in authorized states at the
same time that they take effect in unauthorized states. Thus, EPA will
implement those requirements and prohibitions in Georgia, including the
issuance of new permits implementing those requirements, until the
state is granted authorization to do so.

B. What decisions has EPA made in this rule?

    On September 22, 2015, September 12, 2016, and November 7, 2017,
Georgia submitted program revision applications seeking authorization
of changes to its hazardous waste program that correspond to certain
Federal rules promulgated between July 1, 2005 and June 30, 2017 (also
known as RCRA Clusters XVI, XIX and XXII through XXV). EPA concludes
that Georgia's applications to revise its authorized program meet all
of the statutory and regulatory requirements established by RCRA, as
set forth in RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), and 40 CFR part
271. Therefore, EPA proposes to grant Georgia final authorization to
operate its hazardous waste program with the changes described in its
authorization applications, and as outlined below in Section F of this
document.
    Georgia has responsibility for permitting treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities within its borders and for carrying out the aspects
of the RCRA program described in its revised program applications,
subject to the limitations of HSWA, as discussed above.

C. What is the effect of this proposed authorization decision?

    If Georgia is authorized for the changes described in Georgia's
authorization applications, these changes will become part of the
authorized state hazardous waste program, and therefore will be
federally enforceable. Georgia will continue to have primary
enforcement authority and responsibility for its state hazardous waste
program. EPA would retain its authorities under RCRA sections 3007,
3008, 3013, and 7003, including its authority to:
     Conduct inspections, and require monitoring, tests,
analyses or reports;
     Enforce RCRA requirements, including authorized state
program requirements, and suspend or revoke permits; and
     Take enforcement actions regardless of whether the state
has taken its own actions.
    This action will not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which EPA is proposing
to authorize Georgia are already effective, and are not changed by this
proposed action.

D. What happens if EPA receives comments that oppose this action?

    If EPA receives comments on this proposed action, we will address
all such comments in a later final rule. You may not have another
opportunity to comment. If you want to comment on this authorization,
you must do so at this time.

E. What has Georgia previously been authorized for?

    Georgia initially received final authorization on August 7, 1984,
effective August 21, 1984 (49 FR 31417), to implement the RCRA
hazardous waste management program. EPA granted authorization for
changes to Georgia's program on the following dates: July 7, 1986,
effective September 18, 1986 (51 FR 24549); July 28, 1988, effective
September 26, 1988 (53 FR 28383); July 24, 1990, effective September
24, 1990 (55 FR 30000); February 12, 1991, effective April 15, 1991 (56
FR 5656); May 11, 1992, effective July 10, 1992 (57 FR 20055); November
25, 1992, effective January 25, 1993 (57 FR 55466); February 26, 1993,
effective April 27, 1993 (58 FR 11539); November 16, 1993, effective
January 18, 1994 (58 FR 60388); April 26, 1994, effective June 27, 1994
(59 FR 21664); May 10, 1995, effective July 10, 1995 (60 FR 24790);
August 30, 1995, effective October 30, 1995 (60 FR 45069); March 7,
1996, effective May 6, 1996 (61 FR 9108); September, 18, 1998,
effective November 17, 1998 (63 FR 49852); October 14, 1999, effective
December 13, 1999 (64 FR 55629); November 28, 2000, effective March 30,
2001 (66 FR 8090); July 16, 2002, effective September 16, 2002 (67 FR
46600); November 19, 2002, effective January 21, 2003 (67 FR 69690);
July 18, 2003, effective September 16, 2003 (68 FR 42605); January 27,
2005, effective April 20, 2005 (70 FR 12973); April 25, 2006, effective
June 26, 2006 (71 FR 23864); May 2, 2013, effective July 1, 2013 (78 FR
25579); and January 26, 2015, effective March 27, 2015 (80 FR 3888).

F. What changes are we proposing with this action?

    On September 22, 2015, September 12, 2016, and November 7, 2017,
Georgia submitted program revision applications seeking authorization
of changes to its hazardous waste management program in accordance with
40 CFR 271.21. EPA proposes to determine, subject to receipt of written
comments that oppose this action, that Georgia's hazardous waste
program revisions are equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the Federal program, and therefore satisfy all of the
requirements necessary to qualify for final authorization. Therefore,
EPA is proposing to authorize Georgia for the following program
changes:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Description of federal       Federal Register      Analogous state
         requirement              date and page         authority \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Checklist 213, Burden          71 FR 16862; 4/4/06  391-3-11-.05(1)-(2);
 Reduction Initiative.                               391-3-11-.07(1)-(2)
                                                     ;
                                                    391-3-11-.10(1)-(3);
                                                     391-3-11-.11(3)(h)
                                                     and (7)(d); and 391-
                                                     3-11-.16.
Checklist 228, Hazardous       77 FR 22229; 4/13/   391-3-11-.07(1) and
 Waste Technical Corrections    12.                  391-3-11-.10(3).
 and Clarifications.

Checklist 229, Conditional     78 FR 46448; 7/31/   391-3-11-.02(1) and
 Exclusions for Solvent         13.                  391-3-11-.07(1).
 Contaminated Wipes.
Checklist 231, Hazardous       79 FR 7518;........  391-3-11-.02(1); 391-
 Waste Electronic Manifest     2/7/14.............   3-11-.08(1);
 Rule.                                              91-3-11-.09; and 391-
                                                     3-11-.10(1)-(2).
Checklist 232, Revisions to    79 FR 36220; 6/26/   391-3-11-.02(1) and
 the Export Provisions of the   14.                  391-3-11-.07(1).
 Cathode Ray Tube Rule.
Checklists 219 and 233,        73 FR 64668; 10/30/  391-3-11-.02(1); 391-
 Revisions to the Definition    08;.                 3-11-.05(5);
 of Solid Waste.               80 FR 1694; 1/13/15  391-3-11-.07(1)-(2);
                                                     and 391-3-11-
                                                     .11(7)(d).
Checklist 236, Imports and     81 FR 85696; 11/28/  391-3-11-.02(1); 391-
 Exports of Hazardous Waste.    16.                  3-11-.07(1);
                                                    391-3-11-.08(1); 391-
                                                     3-11-.09;
                                                    391-3-11-.10(1)-(3);
                                                     and 391-3-11-.18.
Checklist 237, Hazardous       81 FR 85732; 11/28/  391-3-11-.01(2)(e);
 Waste Generator Improvements   16.                  391-3-11-.02(1);
 Rule.                                              391-3-11-.07(1); 391-
                                                     3-11-.08(1);
                                                    391-3-11-.09; 391-3-
                                                     11-.10(1)-(3);
                                                    391-3-11-.11(1)(a),
                                                     (5), and (7)(d);
                                                    391-3-11-.16; 391-3-
                                                     11-.17; and 391-3-
                                                     11-.18.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Georgia provisions are from the Georgia Rules for Hazardous
  Waste Management Chapter 391-3-11, effective September 28, 2017.

G. Where are the revised state rules different from the Federal rules?

    EPA considers the following state requirements to go beyond the
scope of the Federal program:
     Georgia is broader in scope than the Federal program in
its adoption of 40 CFR 260.43 (2015) and 40 CFR 261.4(a)(24) (2015) at
Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 391-3-11-.07(1). Both of these regulations
include provisions from the 2015 Definition of Solid Waste (DSW) Rule
that have been vacated and replaced with the less stringent
requirements of 40 CFR 260.43 (2008) and 40 CFR 261.4(a)(24) and (25)
(2008) from the 2008 DSW Rule.
     Georgia is also broader in scope than the Federal program
by not adopting the conditional exclusion for carbon dioxide streams in
geologic sequestration activities (Checklist 230) at 40 CFR 261.4(h)
(see Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 391-3-11-.01(2)). Georgia's continued
regulation of these waste streams is broader in scope than the Federal
program.
    Broader-in-scope requirements are not part of the authorized
program and EPA cannot enforce them. Although regulated entities must
comply with these requirements in accordance with state law, they are
not RCRA requirements.
    EPA cannot delegate certain Federal requirements associated with
the Hazardous Waste Electronic Manifest Rule (Checklist 231), the
Imports and Exports of Hazardous Waste Rule (Checklist 236), and the
Revisions to the Export Provisions of the Cathode Ray Tube Rule
(Checklist 232) (40 CFR 261.39(a)(5) and 261.41). Georgia has adopted
these requirements and appropriately preserved EPA's authority to
implement them (see Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. R. 391-3-11-.01(2)(c))

H. Who handles permits after the final authorization takes effect?

    Georgia will issue permits for all the provisions for which it is
authorized and will administer the permits it issues. EPA will continue
to administer any RCRA hazardous waste permits or portions of permits
which EPA issued prior to the effective date of this authorization
until they are terminated. EPA will not issue any new permits or new
portions of permits for the provisions listed in the Table above after
the effective date of the final authorization. EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which Georgia is
not yet authorized.

I. What is codification and will EPA codify Georgia's hazardous waste
program as proposed in this rule?

    Codification is the process of placing the state's statutes and
regulations that comprise the state's authorized hazardous waste
program into the Code of Federal Regulations. EPA does this by
referencing the authorized state rules in 40 CFR part 272. EPA is not
proposing to codify the authorization of Georgia's changes at this
time. However, EPA reserves the amendment of 40 CFR part 272, subpart
L, for the authorization of Georgia's program changes at a later date.

J. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action
from the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). This action proposes to
authorize state requirements for the purpose of RCRA section 3006 and
imposes no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Therefore, this action is not subject to review by OMB. This action is
not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory
action because actions such as this proposed authorization of Georgia's
revised hazardous waste program under RCRA are exempted under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this action proposes to authorize pre-existing requirements under state
law and does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that
required by state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538). For the same
reason, this action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999),
because it merely proposes to authorize state requirements

as part of the state RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power and responsibilities
established by RCRA. This action also is not subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant and it does not make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This action is not subject to Executive Order
13211, ``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001),
because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
    Under RCRA section 3006(b), EPA grants a state's application for
authorization as long as the state meets the criteria required by RCRA.
It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it
reviews a state authorization application, to require the use of any
particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another standard
that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in proposing this rule, EPA has taken the necessary steps to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation, and
provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. EPA has complied
with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1988) by examining
the takings implications of this action in accordance with the
``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive
order. This action does not impose an information collection burden
under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.). ``Burden'' is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b). Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by
law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying
and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the
United States. Because this action proposes authorization of pre-
existing state rules which are at least equivalent to, and no less
stringent than existing Federal requirements, and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law, and there are no
anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental effects,
this proposed rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

    Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and 6974(b).

    Dated: July 10, 2018.
Onis ``Trey'' Glenn, III,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2018-17206 Filed 8-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: January 8, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 4)]
[Notices]
[Page 775-777]
[DOCID:fr08ja07-60]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

December 29, 2006.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings.

    Docket Numbers: ER00-2268-020.
    Applicants: Pinnacle West Capital Corporation.
    Description: Pinnacle West Capital Corporation withdraws the
default cost-based rate tariff designated as FERC Rate Schedule 2,
Original Sheet 1-4.
    Filed Date: 12/22/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061227-0009.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER03-44-004.
    Applicants: BOC Energy Services, Inc.
    Description: BOC Energy Services, Inc. submits Second Revised Sheet
No. 1 to Revised Rate Schedule FERC No. 1 to comply with Commission's
Order 652.
    Filed Date: 12/26/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 16, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER04-157-015; ER04-714-007.
    Applicants: Western Massachusetts Electric Company.
    Description: Bangor Hydro-Electric Company; Florida Power & Light
Co., submit compliance filing of First Revised Sheet No. 709 and report
on refund process effective 11/1/06.
    Filed Date: 12/21/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061227-0038.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, January 11, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER04-208-003.
    Applicants: Citigroup Energy Inc.
    Description: Citigroup Energy, Inc. submits Triennial Updated
Market Analysis pursuant to FERC's order issued 1/7/04.
    Filed Date: 12/21/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061227-0039.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, January 11, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-864-004; ER06-1543-002; ER00-2885-012; ER01-
2765-011; ER02-1582-010; ER02-1785-007; ER02-2102-011.
    Applicants: Bear Energy LP; Brush Cogeneration Partners, Cedar
Brakes I, L.L.C.; Cedar Brakes II, L.L.C.; Mohawk River Funding IV,
L.L.C.; Thermo Cogeneration Partnership L.P.; Utility Contract Funding,
L.L.C.
    Description: Bear Energy LP et al notifies FERC that they entered
into an Energy Management Agreement w/ MMC Energy North America, LLC et
al in accordance with Order 652.
    Filed Date: 12/26/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0021.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 16, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-1178-002; ER06-1179-002.
    Applicants: SEMASS Partnership.
    Description: SEMASS Partnership submits Revised Rate Schedule FERC
No. 1 & Rate Schedule FERC No. 2 in compliance with Order 614.
    Filed Date: 12/22/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061227-0042.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 12, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-198-001.
    Applicants: Highland Energy LLC.
    Description: Highland Energy LLC submits Revised Original Sheet 1-2
to FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No.1, effective 12/8/06.
    Filed Date: 12/21/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061227-0041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, January 11, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-237-001.
    Applicants: Monongahela Power Company.
    Description: Monongahela Power Co. submits a Master Power Purchase
& Sale Agreement with Allegheny Energy Supply Co., LLC in accordance
with the requirements of Order 614.
    Filed Date: 12/27/2006.

    Accession Number: 20061228-0194.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-250-001.
    Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc.
    Description: Westar Energy, Inc. submits errata to their 11/28/06
filing, effective 6/1/07.
    Filed Date: 12/26/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061227-0040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 16, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-335-000.
    Applicants: E.ON U.S. LLC.
    Description: E.ON U.S., LLC on behalf of Louisville Gas and
Electric Co. et al submits a revised unexecuted Service Agreement for
Network Integration Transmission Service.
    Filed Date: 12/07/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061211-0153.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, January 8, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-337-000.
    Applicants: Reliant Energy Services, Inc.
    Description: Reliant Energy Services, Inc. submits market-based
rate tariff designated as FERC Electric Tariff, Third Revised Volume
No. 1 and requests waiver of the 60-day notice requirement.
    Filed Date: 12/18/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061227-0023.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, January 08, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-367-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Company submits a Small
Generator Interconnection Agreement and a Service Agreement for
Wholesale Distribution Service with MM Tajiguas Energy, LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/26/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061227-0033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 16, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-368-000.
    Applicants: Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.
    Description: Orange and Rockland, Inc. submits an amendment to its
FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 3, to be effective 3/1/07.
    Filed Date: 12/26/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061227-0077.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 16, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-370-000.
    Applicants: TexRep2 LLC.
    Description: TexRep2, LLC submits its petition for acceptance of
FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1.
    Filed Date: 12/26/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0055.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 16, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-371-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool, Inc. and Calpine Oneta Power,
L.P. submit revisions to its Open Access Transmission Tariff, in
compliance with FERC's 9/26/06 Order.
    Filed Date: 12/26/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0020.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, January 16, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-372-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison submits a Small Generator
Interconnection Agreement and Service Agreement for Wholesale
Distribution Service with MM West Covina Two LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/27/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0054.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-373-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Southern California Edison Co. submits a Small
Generator Interconnection Agreement and a Service Agreement for
Wholesale Distribution Service w/ MM West Covina One LLC under ER07-
373.
    Filed Date: 12/27/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0056.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-374-000.
    Applicants: Buena Vista Energy, LLC.
    Description: Buena Vista Energy, LLC submits its application for
order accepting Market-Based Rate Tariff, Granting Authorizations and
Blanket Authority.
    Filed Date: 12/27/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0199.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-375-000.
    Applicants: Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation.
    Description: Niagara Mohawk Power Corp., submits the First. Revised
Tri-Lakes Agreement designated as First Revised Service Agreement 340
under FERC Electric Tariff, Original Volume No. 1.
    Filed Date: 12/27/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0195.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-376-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corp provides
notice regarding the revised transmission Access Charges for five
consecutive periods of 1/1/01-5/5/01 etc.
    Filed Date: 12/27/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0197.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-377-000.
    Applicants: TFS Capital LLC.
    Description: TFS Capital, LLC submits their petition for acceptance
of initial rate schedule.
    Filed Date: 12/27/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0196.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-378-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: PJM Interconnection, LLC submits revisions to the
chart in Schedule 2 of the Open Access Transmission Tariff to
incorporate revised revenue requirements for PPL University Park, LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/27/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0198.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 17, 2007.

    Docket Numbers: ER98-2603-004; ER98-2603-005.
    Applicants: Southwood 2000, Inc.
    Description: Southwood 2000, Inc requests that this letter
constitutes an Amendment to the 7/27/05 filing.
    Filed Date: 12/22/2006.
    Accession Number: 20061228-0097.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, January 12, 2007.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR Sec.  385.211 and
Sec.  385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a
subdocket related to a compliance filing if you have previously
intervened in the same docket. Protests will be considered by the
Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken but will
not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing
a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on
the Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and

http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet

access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or
call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-22688 Filed 1-5-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 22, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 77)]
[Notices]
[Page 21063-21064]
[DOCID:fr22ap10-123]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61907; File No. SR-FINRA-2010-016]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Section 4(c) of Schedule A to the FINRA
By-Laws To Add a Reference to the Fees Assessed for the Series 51, 52
and 53 Examinations

April 14, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on April 9, 2010, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. FINRA has
designated the proposed rule change as ``establishing or changing a
due, fee or other charge'' under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\
and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal
effective upon receipt of this filing by the Commission. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    FINRA is proposing to amend Section 4(c) of Schedule A to the FINRA
By-Laws to add a reference to the fees assessed for the Series 51,
Series 52 and Series 53 examinations.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's Web
site at http://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Series 51 (Municipal Fund Securities Limited Principal), Series
52 (Municipal Securities Representative), and Series 53 (Municipal
Securities Principal) examinations are administered by FINRA on behalf
of the Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board (``MSRB'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The MSRB develops, maintains and owns the Series 51, Series
52 and Series 53 examinations. See Exchange Act Section 15B(c)(7)(A)
regarding administration of examinations for associated persons of
municipal securities brokers and municipal securities [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Series 51, Series 52 and Series 53 examinations are intended to
safeguard the investing public by helping to ensure that certain
persons associated

with municipal securities brokers and municipal securities dealers meet
minimum qualifications to perform their jobs. Given this purpose, these
examinations seek to measure accurately and reliably the degree to
which each candidate possesses the knowledge, skills and abilities
necessary to perform his or her job. Currently, the Series 51
examination is 1\1/2\ hours and consists of 60 multiple-choice
questions, and the Series 52 and Series 53 examinations are each 3
hours and each consists of 200 multiple-choice questions.
    FINRA proposes to amend Section 4(c) of Schedule A to the FINRA By-
Laws to add a reference to the fees assessed by FINRA for administering
the Series 51, Series 52 and Series 53 examinations as follows: $85 for
the Series 51 examination, $95 for the Series 52 examination, and $95
for the Series 53 examination. The proposed rule change does not change
the amount of the administration fee for the Series 51, Series 52 or
Series 53 examination.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ As noted above, the MSRB develops, maintains and owns the
Series 51, Series 52 and Series 53 examinations. The MSRB currently
charges a $60 fee for the development of each of these examinations.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61023 (Nov. 18, 2009), 74 FR
61402 (Nov. 24, 2009) (Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness
of New Rule A-16, on Examination Fees, SR-MSRB-2009-16). As a
result, the total fee currently assessed for the Series 51, Series
52 and Series 53 examination is $145, $155 and $155, respectively.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA has filed the proposed rule change for immediate
effectiveness. FINRA proposes to implement the proposed rule change on
the date of filing of the proposed rule change.
2. Statutory Basis
    FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A of the Act,\7\ in general, and with Section
15A(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system
which FINRA operates or controls. In light of FINRA's role in
administering the Series 51, Series 52 and Series 53 examinations on
behalf of the MSRB pursuant to Exchange Act Section 15B(c)(7)(A), FINRA
believes it is appropriate to reflect the fees charged in connection
with those examinations in the fee table in Schedule A to the FINRA By-
Laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3.
    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\10\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(x) [sic].
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2010-016 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2010-016. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on
official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of FINRA. All comments received will be posted without
change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information
from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to
make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number
SR-FINRA-2010-016 and should be submitted on or before May 13, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-9271 Filed 4-21-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Steam Electric Data Request Follow-Up Questions

Project Name:  Steam Electric Detailed Study

	Project No.:  0<IP_ADDRESS>

Company Name:  Georgia Power

	Contact Name:  William R. Evans

Plant Name:  Plant Wansley	Contact Phone Number:<PHONE_NUMBER>

or Email Address<EMAIL_ADDRESS> ERG Staff (or ERG Rep) Name: Sarah Holman

Company Affiliation: ERG	Date: 11/21/07

This document contains CBI:   ___  Yes    x       No

	Type of  Contact:     x      Email           Telephone

General Subject:  Data Request Assistance / Follow-Up

Follow-Up Question Number	CBI =

Yes (Y)

No (N)	Data Request Question Number	Data Request Page Number

Question/Answer

1	N	8	B-3	Q: The combined cycle units (Units 6-9) operated at Plant Wansley are not included in Table 2.  Please verify that the reason Georgia Power did not include these combine cycle units in its data request response is that it did not operate these units in 2006.

Please confirm that Unit 5 was not included in Table 2 because it is an oil-fired combustion turbine with no steam electric operations.

A:

2	N	11	B-8	Q: Frequency of drainage from coal pile is given as 365 days.  Does the plant have an estimation of the actual number of days of drainage from the coal pile, or an estimation of the number of days of rain in 2006?

A:

3	N	16	B-10	Q: Type of fly ash handling system is listed as both wet and dry.  What is the approximate percentage of the time that the fly ash is handled in a dry fashion?

A:

4	N	18	B-12	Q: The total bottom ash sluice flow rate for Units 1 and 2 is 2,566 gpm in Table 6, whereas it is listed as 2,580 gpm in the process diagram, 5-1.  Please explain this difference.  Which flow rate is more accurate?

A:

5	N	31	B-21	Q: Why was wastewater generated from the Unit 2 air pre-heater, but not from the Unit 1 air pre-heater in 2006?

A:

6	N	38	B-25	Q: CT 1 and CT 2 both used gaseous chlorine in 2006, with the same average addition amount, but the amount is listed as ppd for CT 1 and gpd for CT 2.  Please confirm that the measurement units should be ppd for both.

A:

7	N	38	B-25	Q: No measurement units were provided for the average addition amount of liquid sodium hypochlorite for CT 2.  Please provide the measurement units.

A:

8	N	43	B-26	Q: Outfalls 01D, 01F-01K, 02, 02D-02K, 03A, 03B, and 04-06 are not listed in Table 14 or the process diagrams.  Did they discharge in 2006?  03A and 03 B refer to a north and south ash pond.  Does the plant operate two ash ponds (only one is indicated on the process diagram and in the wastewater treatment tables)?

A:

9	N	47	B-28	Q: Regarding Diagram 5-1, please confirm that no wastewater treatment occurs in the Low Volume Waste Basin.

A:

10	N	47	B-28	Q: For WWT-1 (Diagram 5-1), please confirm that pH adjustment occurs within (as part of) the ash pond and not within a separate tank/pond as indicated in the diagram.

A:

11	N	47	B-28	Q: On Diagram 5-1, there is more wastewater shown entering the ash pond than exiting.  Please confirm that the reason for this is evaporation.

A:

12	N	47	B-28	Q: For WWT-2 (Diagram 5-2), please confirm that pH adjustment and chemical precipitation occur within the settling pond and not within separate vessels as shown on the diagram?  What chemicals are typically added for chemical precipitation?

A:

13	N	47	B-28	Q: For WWT-3 (Diagram 5-3), is the effluent from the coal pile runoff pond continuous at 30 gpm or intermittent?

A:

14	N	49	B-32	Q: For WWT-2, does the plant operate two settling ponds (only one is shown on Diagram 5-2)?  If so, what is the volume and wastewater residence time in each pond?

A:

15	N	49	B-32	Q: For WWT-3, does the plant operate two settling ponds (only one is shown on Diagram 5-3)?  If so, what is the volume and wastewater residence time in each pond?

A:

16	N	51	B-33	Q: For WWT-1, the “Average Dose Concentration” of sulfuric acid is listed as “Not measured – varies as necessary for pH”.  As requested in EPA’s email to UWAG on 7/11/07, please provide the concentration of the active ingredient added (i.e., the amount of active ingredient contained in the chemical product).

A:

17	N	52	B-34	Q: For WWT-1, did FAS, BAS, and PMRS enter the ash pond 24 hpd and 365 dpy?  Was the recycle from the ash pond used for RECYC-FAS, RECYC-BAS, and RECYC-PMRS 24 hpd and 365 dpy?

A: