EXAMPLE PROCEDURE FOR COLLECTING SOURCE WATER SAMPLES FOR E. COLI ANALYSES JUNE 2003 DRAFT Draft June 2003 1 Example Procedure for Collecting Source Water Samples for E. coli Analyses 1.0 Required Materials Check to make sure the following materials are available before collecting sample:

Q Several pairs of new, powder free latex gloves ( Lab Safety Supply, cat. number 16285XL, or equivalent)

Q Sterile, non toxic, glass or plastic container with a leak proof lid. Container should be capable of holding 120 mL or 250 mL with ample headspace to facilitate mixing of sample by shaking prior to analysis ( Nalgene polypropylene wide mouth bottles, cat. number, 21050008, or equivalent)

Q Sample number label Q Turbidimeter The following additional materials will be needed if the sample will be shipped off site for analysis:

Q Sample collection form Q Plastic sample bags ( 1 gallon) ( Ziplock, or equivalent)

Q Cooler, approximately 9 quart ( Coleman, cat. number, 6209 703, or equivalent)

Q Two large plastic trash bags Q One 8 lb. bag of ice or Gel ice packs ( VWR, cat. number, 15715 105, or equivalent)

Q Strapping tape Q Two, self adhesive plastic airbill sleeves Q Airbill for shipment 2.0 Collecting the Sample 2.1 Record the sample number, sample location, samplers name, observations, and sampling date and time in a sampling log book if the sample will be analyzed on site.

If the sample will be shipped off site, record the following information on the sample collection form:

O Public water system ( PWS) name O PWS address O Sampler name O Sample ID ( optional)

O Public Water System Identification ( PWSID) number O Public Water System facility ID number O Facility name Draft June 2003 2 O Sample collection point ID O Sample collection point name O Sample collection date O Source water type O Requested analysis ( circle " E. coli")

2.2 Water taps used for sampling should be free of aerators, strainers, hose attachments, mixing type faucets, and purification devices. The service line should be cleared before sampling by maintaining a steady water flow for at least two minutes ( until the water changes temperature). Please note: Pre rinsing the sample containers with sample is prohibited when collecting E. coli samples.

2.3 Adjust the flow of water out of the tap or hose so the water will not splash out when it is collected into the sample container.

2.4 If there is not an inline tap that allows for the sampling of source water prior to treatment, samples should be collected as close to the intake as possible from either land or boat. Source water samples should be collected close to the surface using a grab sampling technique. Samples may be collected manually by direct submersion of the bottle into the water or by using a grab sampling device, as simple as a metal pole with an adjustable clamp at one end that holds the sampling bottle in place.

2.4 Measure the turbidity of the source water. Record the following on the sample collection form:

O Turbidity measurement, in NTU 2.5 Using aseptic technique ( i. e., sanitize tap, do not touch the inside of the sample container, etc.), fill the E. coli sample container, leaving at least 1 inch of head space. Do not expose an opened container any longer than necessary. Record the system name, sampler's name, sample number, date and time of sample collection, sample location, and analysis requested on the sample container.

2.6 Immediately following sample collection, tighten the sample container lid. If the sample will be shipped off site for analysis, and will not be shipped for several hours, place the sample container upright in a refrigerator to maintain the sample at a temperature of less than 10 ° C, but not freezing, prior to shipment. If a refrigerator is not available, wrap the sample with insulation such as bubble wrap or paper towels ( to prevent freezing), place the sample in a ziplock bag, and place the bag containing the sample in the shipping cooler with wet ice or ice packs. Replace with fresh ice or ice packs immediately prior to shipment. Draft June 2003 3 3.0 Packing the Sample ( Applicable to Samples Shipped Off Site for Analysis)

3.1 Insert two large plastic trash bags into the shipping cooler to create a double liner. Immediately before packing the cooler, disperse 6 pounds of ice into 3 to 4 plastic, ziplock bags. Gel packs or blue ice may be used in lieu of wet ice, as long as the sample is maintained in the appropriate temperature range. Seal the ziplock bags, expelling as much air as possible, and secure top with tape.

Note! Shipping companies may delay sample shipments if leakage occurs. Double liners and ziplock bags around ice will prevent leakage and delays.

3.2 Place the bag containing the samples into the shipping container. Place the ice or ice packs around, but not on, the sample bag to prevent freezing.

3.3 If you will be monitoring sample temperature during shipment, place in the cooler the temperature monitoring device ( e. g., extra sample bottle for measuring sample temperature upon receipt at the laboratory, thermometer vial, or Thermochron   iButton). Seal each liner bag by twisting top of bag and tying in a knot 3.4 Peel the backing off one of the plastic airbill sleeves and attach the sleeve to the inside of the cooler lid.

O Sign and date the sample collection form.

Fold the completed sample collection form, and place it inside the plastic sleeve.

3.5 Close the cooler lid, seal the horizontal joints with duct tape, and secure the lid with tape by taping the cooler at each end, perpendicular to the seal.

Note! Shipping companies may delay sample shipments if leakage occurs. Be sure to seal the cooler joints.

3.6 Peel the backing off of the second airbill sleeve and attach the sleeve to the outside of the cooler lid. Complete the shipping airbill with the laboratory address, billing information, sample weight, and shipping service. Remove the shipper's copy of the airbill, and place the remainder of the airbill inside the plastic sleeve.

4.0 Shipping and Tracking 4.1 Ship samples on the day of collection and use a reliable shipping service for next day delivery.

4.2 Contact the laboratory to notify them of the sample shipment. Request that the laboratory contact you the next day if the sample is not received.

4.3 Using the airbill number on the shipper's copy of the airbill, track the sample shipment using the shipping company's web page or by contacting the shipping company over the phone.

4.4 If problems are encountered with the shipment, communicate with the shipping company to resolve, and update the laboratory regarding the status of the shipment.


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62841-62842]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24653]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-70655; File No. SR-BX-2013-054]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fee Schedule Under Exchange
Rule 7018(a) With Respect to Transactions in Securities Priced at $1
per Share or Greater

October 10, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on September 27, 2013, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the fee schedule under Exchange Rule
7018(a) with respect to transactions in securities priced at $1 per
share or greater. The Exchange will implement the proposed rule change
on October 1, 2013.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's Web site at http://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to amend the credit it pays with respect
to routable orders that access liquidity on the Exchange (either before
or after routing to other venues). Currently, the Exchange pays a
credit of $0.0013 or $0.0011 per share executed for orders that execute
at BX if the member achieves certain volume tiers and a credit of
$0.0007 per share executed if such tiers are not reached. However, the
Exchange pays a credit of $0.0014 per share executed with respect to
routable orders (specifically, orders using the Exchange's BSTG, BSCN,
BMOP, BTFY, BCRT, BDRK, or BCST routing strategies) if such orders
execute at the Exchange. The Exchange is reducing this credit to
$0.0011 per share executed, as a means of reducing costs in a period of
persistent low trading volumes. The Exchange notes, however, that it is
still providing an incentive for members to use the Exchange's routing
functionality by paying a credit available to all members, regardless
of their trading volumes, that exceeds the base credit of $0.0007 per
share executed otherwise available.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange notes that the credits discussed above do not
apply to orders that execute against midpoint pegged orders, since
such orders receive price improvement in lieu of an Exchange-paid
credit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    BX believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\4\ in general, and Sections 6(b)(4)
and (b)(5) of the Act,\5\ in particular, because it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system that
the Exchange operates or controls, and it does not unfairly
discriminate between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change is reasonable because it reflects a modest
decrease of $0.0003 per share executed in the credit paid to members
with routable orders that execute at the Exchange. The resulting credit
is comparable to the credit that members receive if they provide an
average daily volume of at least 25,000, but less than 1 million,
shares of liquidity during the month, which is a higher rate than the
base rate of $0.0007 per share executed. The change is consistent with
an equitable allocation of fees and is not unfairly discriminatory
because it makes the credits applicable to routable orders that execute
at the Exchange more consistent with the credits paid with respect to
other orders that execute at the Exchange. Although the credit exceeds
the base rate of $0.0007, the difference is not unfairly discriminatory
because the credit offered with respect to routable orders is still
available to all members, regardless of volume levels, and is intended
to provide an incentive for BX members to make use of the Exchange's
optional routing functionality.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.\6\
BX notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment,
BX must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
exchanges and with alternative trading systems that have been exempted
from compliance with the statutory standards applicable to exchanges.
Because competitors are free to modify their own fees in response, and
because market participants may readily adjust their order routing
practices, BX believes that the degree to which fee changes in this
market may impose any burden on competition is extremely limited. In
this instance, the decreased credit is intended to reduce the
Exchange's costs, while still continuing to provide an incentive for

members to make use of its optional routing functionality. The reduced
credit of $0.0011 per share executed continues to reflect a higher
credit than the base credit of $0.0007 per share executed, and is
available to all members, regardless of volume levels. Thus, it is
intended to maintain an incentive for members to use BX's optional
routing functionality. However, because there are numerous competitive
alternatives to the use of this functionality, it is likely that BX
will lose market share as a result of the changes if they are
unattractive to market participants. Accordingly, BX does not believe
that the proposed changes will impair the ability of members or
competing order execution venues to maintain their competitive standing
in the financial markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\7\ At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii)
for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2013-054 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2013-054. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
).
    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2013-054 and
should be submitted on or before November 12, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24653 Filed 10-21-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


                             SUPPORTING STATEMENT
	ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

                NESHAP for Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production
                  (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Amendments)
                                 February 2018

Part A of the Supporting Statement

1.  Identification of the Information Collection

      1(a)  Title of the Information Collection

      "NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Amendments)," EPA ICR Number 1964.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0496.

      1(b)  Short Characterization/Abstract

      The National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production were proposed on May 26, 2000, promulgated on April 11, 2002, and most recently amended on April 20, 2006. The NESHAP is codified at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH. Amendments to the NESHAP are being proposed as a result of the residual risk and technology review (RTR) required under the Clean Air Act (CAA) (as discussed further below). The NESHAP apply to wet-formed fiberglass mat production facilities that emit greater than or equal to 10 tons per year (tpy) of any one hazardous air pollutant (HAP) or greater than or equal to 25 tpy of any combination of HAP. Affected sources include new and existing drying and curing ovens. The pollutants regulated include organic HAP, using formaldehyde as a surrogate. New facilities include those that commenced construction or reconstruction after the date of the original proposal (May 26, 2000).  This information is being collected to assure compliance with 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH.

      In general, all NESHAP require initial notifications, performance tests, and periodic reports by the owners/operators of the affected facilities. Owners/operators are also required to maintain records of the occurrence and duration of any failures to meet applicable standards, or any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These notifications, reports, and records are essential in determining compliance, and are required of all sources subject to NESHAP. A semiannual report is also required.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Any owner or operator subject to the provisions of this part shall maintain a file of these measurements, and retain the file for at least 5 years following the date of such measurements, maintenance reports, and records. All reports are submitted to the delegated state or local authority. In the event that there is no such delegated authority, the reports are submitted directly to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regional office.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The proposed amendments to the rule eliminate the startup, shutdown, and malfunction (SSM) exemption; remove the SSM plan and periodic report requirements; require electronic submittal of performance test results; require that compliance reports be submitted on a semiannual basis in all instances, consistent with the General Provisions; reduce the parameter monitoring and recording requirements during use of binder containing no HAP; and make miscellaneous technical and editorial changes. The remaining portions of the NESHAP remain unchanged.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Based on consultation with industry representatives and state/local agencies, there are seven facilities subject to the standards. Five facilities have one affected drying and curing oven each and two facilities have two affected drying and curing ovens each. Each plant site has only one respondent (i.e., the owner/operator). Over the next 3 years, seven respondents per year will be subject to these standards, and no additional respondents per year will become subject to these standards. None of the seven facilities are owned by state, local, or tribal governments or the Federal government. They are owned and operated by privately owned for-profit businesses.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the currently active ICR without any "Terms of Clearance."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.  Need for and Use of the Collection
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      2(a)  Need/Authority for the Collection
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Section 112 of the CAA requires the EPA to establish NESHAP for major sources of HAP that are listed for regulation under CAA section 112(c). A major source is a stationary source that emits or has the potential to emit more than 10 tpy of any single HAP or more than 25 tpy of any combination of HAP. For major sources, the NESHAP includes technology-based standards that must reflect the maximum degree of emission reductions of HAP achievable (after considering cost, energy requirements, and non-air quality health and environmental impacts). The NESHAP are commonly referred to as maximum achievable control technology (MACT) standards. In the Administrator's judgment, HAP emissions, including formaldehyde and methanol, from drying and curing ovens at wet-formed fiberglass mat production sources cause or contribute to air pollution that may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare. Therefore, the NESHAP for this source category were promulgated at 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH in 2002.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Section 112(d)(6) of the CAA requires the EPA to review the technology-based MACT standards and revise them "as necessary (taking into account developments in practices, processes, and control technologies)" no less frequently than every 8 years. In addition, section 112(f) of the CAA requires the EPA to determine whether the MACT emission limitations provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health. For MACT standards for HAP "classified as a known, probable, or possible human carcinogen" that "do not reduce lifetime excess cancer risks to the individual most exposed to emissions from a source in the category or subcategory to less than 1-in-1 million," the EPA must promulgate residual risk standards for the source category (or subcategory) as necessary to provide an ample margin of safety to protect public health. In doing so, the EPA may adopt standards equal to existing MACT standards, if the EPA determines that the existing standards are sufficiently protective. The EPA must also adopt more stringent standards, if necessary, to prevent an adverse environmental effect, but must consider cost, energy, safety, and other relevant factors in doing so.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Certain records and reports are necessary for the Administrator to confirm the compliance status of sources subject to NESHAP, identify any new or reconstructed sources subject to the standards, and confirm that the standards are being achieved on a continuous basis. These recordkeeping and reporting requirements are specifically authorized by section 114 of the CAA (42 U.S.C. 7414) and set out in the part 63 NESHAP General Provisions (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A). CAA section 114(a) states that the Administrator may require any owner or operator subject to any requirement of this Act to:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (A) Establish and maintain such records; (B) make such reports; (C) install, use, and maintain such monitoring equipment, and use such audit procedures, or methods; (D) sample such emissions (in accordance with such procedures or methods, at such locations, at such intervals, during such periods, and in such manner as the Administrator shall prescribe); (E) keep records on control equipment parameters, production variables or other indirect data when direct monitoring of emissions is impractical; (F) submit compliance certifications in accordance with Section 114(a)(3); and (G) provide such other information as the Administrator may reasonably require.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      2(b)  Practical Utility/Users of the Data
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The control of emissions of HAP from drying and curing ovens at wet-formed fiberglass mat production facilities requires not only the installation of properly designed equipment, but also the operation and maintenance of that equipment. Emissions of HAP from these facilities are the result of operation of the affected sources.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The standards are achieved by the reduction of pollutant emissions using control technology. The notifications required in the standards are used to inform the Agency or delegated authority when a source becomes subject to the requirements of the regulations. The reviewing authority may then inspect the source to check if the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated, leaks are being detected and repaired, and the standards are being met.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Performance test reports are needed, as these are the Agency's record of a source's initial and ongoing capability to comply with the emission standards and serve as a record of the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. The semiannual compliance reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The information generated by the monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements described in this ICR is used by the Agency to ensure that facilities affected by the NESHAP continue to operate their control equipment and achieve continuous compliance with the regulation. Adequate monitoring, recordkeeping, and reporting are necessary to ensure compliance with these standards, as required by the CAA. The information collected from recordkeeping and reporting requirements is also used for targeting inspections, and is of sufficient quality to be used as evidence in court.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.  Nonduplication, Consultations, and Other Collection Criteria
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The requested recordkeeping and reporting are required under 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      3(a)  Nonduplication
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      If the subject standards have not been delegated, the information is submitted directly to the appropriate EPA regional office. Otherwise, the information is submitted directly to the delegated state or local agency. If a state or local agency has adopted its own similar standards to implement the Federal standards, a copy of the report submitted to the state or local agency can be submitted to the Administrator in lieu of the report required by the Federal standards. Therefore, no duplication exists.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      3(b)  Public Notice Required Prior to ICR Submission to OMB
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      This section is not applicable because this is a rule-related ICR. Nevertheless, the ICR will be available for public review during the public comment period following publication of the proposed Subpart HHHH RTR in the Federal Register.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      3(c)  Consultations

      Stakeholder outreach occurred with industry groups including Asphalt Roofing Manufacturers Association (ARMA) and member companies. This outreach is the basis for the number of affected facilities and industry growth over the next 3 years. Further stakeholder and public input is expected through public comment and follow-up meetings with interested stakeholders.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      3(d)  Effects of Less Frequent Collection
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Less frequent information collection would decrease the margin of assurance that facilities are continuing to meet the standards. Requirements for information gathering and recordkeeping are useful techniques to ensure that good operation and maintenance practices are applied and emission limitations are met. If the information required by these standards was collected less frequently, the likelihood of detecting poor operation and maintenance of control equipment and noncompliance would decrease.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      3(e)  General Guidelines
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements violate any of the regulations established by OMB under 5 CFR 1320.5.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	These standards require the respondents to maintain all records, including reports and notifications for at least 5 years. This is consistent with the General Provisions as applied to the standards. The EPA believes that the 5-year records retention requirement is consistent with the Part 70 permit program and the 5-year statute of limitations on which the permit program is based. The retention of records for 5 years allows the EPA to establish the compliance history of a source, any pattern of noncompliance, and to determine the appropriate level of enforcement action. The EPA has found that the most flagrant violators have violations extending beyond 5 years. In addition, the EPA would be prevented from pursuing the violators due to the destruction or nonexistence of essential records.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      3(f)  Confidentiality
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Any information submitted to the Agency for which a claim of confidentiality is made will be safeguarded according to the Agency policies set forth in Title 40, Chapter 1, Part 2, Subpart B - Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI) (see 40 CFR 2; 41 FR 36902, September 1, 1976; amended by 43 FR 40000, September 8, 1978; 43 FR 42251, September 20, 1978; 44 FR 17674, March 23, 1979).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      3(g)  Sensitive Questions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      None of these reporting or recordkeeping requirements contain sensitive questions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.  The Respondents and the Information Requested
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      4(a)  Respondents/NAICS Codes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The respondents to the recordkeeping and reporting requirements are owners or operators of facilities that produce wet-formed fiberglass mat subject to 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes for respondents affected by the standards is 327212.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      4(b)  Information Requested
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (i)  Data Items
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      All data in this ICR that are recorded and/or reported are required by 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH. Subpart HHHH references 40 CFR Part 63, Subpart A for several general reporting and recordkeeping requirements that apply for all NESHAP.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      A source must make the following notifications and reports:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notifications/Reports
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Requirement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation Reference (40 CFR Part 63)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Construction/reconstruction
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.5(d)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial applicability of standard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.9(b)(1), (2)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Actual startup
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.9(b)(4)(v)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source is subject to special compliance requirements, if applicable
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.9(d)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Performance test
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.7(b), 63.9(e)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Performance test results
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.10(d)(2), 63.3000(d)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electronic submittal of performance test data
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.3000(d)(1)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuous monitoring system (CMS) performance evaluation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.9(g)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Performance evaluation results
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.10(e)(2), 63.3000(e)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance status when a source becomes subject to the standard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.9(h), 63.3000(b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Semiannual compliance reports
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.3000(c), 63.10(e)(3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for extension of compliance with relevant standard
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.9(c)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Change in information already provided
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.9(j)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      A source must keep the following records:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recordkeeping
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5-year retention of records
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.10(b)(1), 63.2999(a)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Records of maintenance on air pollution control and monitoring equipment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.10(b)(2)(iii),
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.2998(d)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Records of performance tests, CMS performance evaluations, measurements, calibrations, and adjustments
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.10(b)(2)(vi-xi), (xiii),
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 63.10(c)(1), (5-8), (10-14)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.10(d)(2), (e)(2), (3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operation, maintenance, and monitoring (OMM) plan
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.2998(b)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Records of monitored parameter values for operating limits
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.2998(c)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation of initial notifications and notifications of compliance status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.10(b)(2)(xiv)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of failures to meet applicable standards
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For each failure: date, time, and duration; cause; a list of affected sources or equipment, noncompliant emissions estimates, and method used to estimate emissions; and actions taken to minimize emissions and corrective actions taken to return affected unit to normal operation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.2998(e)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation for applicability determinations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.10(b)(3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Documentation required for waiver of recordkeeping or reporting requirements (if applicable)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
63.10(b)(2)(xii)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electronic Reporting
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Currently, sources are using monitoring equipment that provides automated parameter data (e.g., control device parameter monitoring). Although personnel at the facilities still need to evaluate the data, this type of monitoring equipment has significantly reduced the burden associated with monitoring and recordkeeping. As part of the RTR amendments, respondents would be required to use the EPA's Electronic Reporting Tool (ERT) to submit performance test reports for test methods supported by the ERT. The ERT can be accessed via the Compliance and Emissions Data Reporting Interface (CEDRI) and CEDRI can be accessed through the EPA's Central Data Exchange (CDX) (https://cdx.epa.gov/).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (ii)  Respondent Activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respondent Activities

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Read and understand the rule requirements.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Install, calibrate, maintain, and operate CMS.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conduct performance tests using EPA Reference Methods 1, 2, 3 or 3A, 4, and 316, 318, or 320, and repeat performance tests if necessary.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Write the notifications and reports listed above.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Develop a record system (e.g., develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of collecting, validating, verifying, processing, maintaining, disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter information required to be recorded above.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transmit, or otherwise disclose the information.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.  The Information Collected:  Agency Activities, Collection Methodology, and Information Management
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      5(a)  Agency Activities
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      EPA conducts the following activities in connection with the acquisition, analysis, storage, and distribution of the required information:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Activities

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review notifications, including notifications of construction/reconstruction, actual startup, applicability of standard, performance test, performance evaluation, and compliance status.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review reports, including performance test reports and semiannual compliance reports, required to be submitted by industry.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Input, analyze, and maintain data in Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      5(b)  Collection Methodology and Management
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Following notification of startup, the reviewing authority could inspect the source to determine whether the pollution control devices are properly installed and operated. Performance test reports are used by the Agency to discern a source's initial capability to comply with the emission standard and note the operating conditions under which compliance was achieved. Data and records maintained by the respondents are tabulated and published for use in compliance and enforcement programs. The semiannual reports are used for problem identification, as a check on source operation and maintenance, and for compliance determinations.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Information contained in the reports is entered into the EPA's ECHO, which is operated and maintained by the EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance. ECHO is the EPA's database to provide integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. The EPA uses ECHO for tracking air pollution compliance and enforcement by local and state regulatory agencies, EPA regional offices and EPA headquarters. The EPA and its delegated Authorities can edit, store, retrieve and analyze the data. ECHO allows users (including the public) to search and obtain information on permits data, inspections, violations, enforcement actions, and penalties.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The records required by this regulation must be retained by the owner/operator for 5 years.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      5(c)  Small Entity Flexibility
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
	All current respondents are large entities (i.e., large businesses). However, the impact on small entities (i.e., small businesses) was taken into consideration during the development of the regulation because, at that time, two small entities were anticipated to be subject to the NESHAP. Due to technical considerations involving the process operations and the types of control equipment employed, the recordkeeping and reporting requirements promulgated were the same for both small and large entities. The Agency considers these requirements to be the minimum needed to ensure compliance, and any future respondents that are small entities would be subject to the requirements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      5(d)  Collection Schedule
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The specific frequency for each information collection activity within this request is shown below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost  -  NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Amendments).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.  Estimating the Burden and Cost of the Collection
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Table 1 documents the computation of individual burdens for the recordkeeping and reporting requirements applicable to the industry for the subpart included in this ICR. The individual burdens are expressed under standardized headings believed to be consistent with the concept of burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act. Where appropriate, specific tasks and major assumptions have been identified. Responses to this information collection are mandatory.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      6(a)  Estimating Respondent Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The average annual burden to industry over the next 3 years from these recordkeeping and reporting requirements is estimated to be 1,470 hours per year (Total Labor Hours from Table 1). These hours are based on Agency studies and background documents from the development of the regulation, Agency knowledge and experience with the NESHAP program, the previously approved ICR, and any comments received.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      6(b)  Estimating Respondent Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (i)  Estimating Labor Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      This ICR uses the following labor rates:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                            Civilian Labor Category
                               Occupational Code
                      BLS Mean Wage Estimate, in 2016$[a]
                         Loaded Wage (+110%), in 2016$
Managerial
                                    11-1021
                                    $58.70
                                    $123.27
Technical
                                    51-8090
                                    $30.65
                                    $64.37
Clerical
                                    43-6010
                                    $19.39
                                    $40.72
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [a] https://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_nat.htm#00-0000
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, survey titled May 2016 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates United States." The rates are from column 8, "Mean hourly wage." The rates have been increased by 110 percent to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (ii)  Estimating Capital/Startup and Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The only costs to the regulated industry resulting from information collection activities required by the subject standard are labor costs. There are no capital/startup or operation and maintenance costs. The capital/startup costs are one-time costs when a facility becomes subject to the regulation. Existing sources are in compliance with initial rule requirements and no new sources are anticipated to be constructed over the 3-year period of this ICR. The annual O&M costs are the ongoing costs to maintain the CMS. No O&M costs are being attributed to industry as a result of this rule because the use of temperature monitors on thermal oxidizers are necessary to determine whether they are operating properly.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (iii)  Capital/Startup vs. O&M Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The only type of industry costs associated with the information collection activity in the regulations is labor cost. There are no capital/startup or O&M costs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      6(c)  Estimating Agency Burden and Cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The only costs to the Agency are costs associated with analysis of the reported information. Publication and distribution of the information are part of the ECHO program. Examination of records maintained by the respondents will occur as part of the periodic inspection of sources, which is part of the EPA's overall compliance and enforcement program. The average annual Agency cost during the 3 years of the ICR is estimated to be $8,400.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      This cost is based on the average hourly labor rate as follows:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                              Agency Worker Rates
                             Labor Rates, $/hr[a]
                                 60% Overhead
                                  Total, $/hr
Managerial (GS-13, step 5)
                                    $40.50
                                    $24.30
                                    $64.80
Technical (GS-12, step 1)
                                    $30.05
                                    $18.03
                                    $48.08
Clerical (GS-6, step 3)
                                    $16.26
                                     $9.76
                                    $26.02
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [a] https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2016/GS_h.pdf
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      These rates are from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), 2017 General Schedule, which excludes locality rates of pay. The rates have been increased by 60 percent to account for the benefit packages available to government employees. Details upon which this estimate is based appear below in Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost  -  NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Amendments).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      6(d)  Estimating the Respondent Universe and Total Burden and Costs
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Based on our research for this ICR, there are 7 existing respondents currently subject to the standard, all of which will keep records and submit reports. It is estimated that no additional respondents will become subject to the regulation in the next 3 years. The average number of respondents is calculated using the following table that addresses the 3 years covered by this ICR:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Respondents

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respondents That Submit Reports

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Respondents That Do Not Submit Any Reports

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Year

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of New Respondents [1]

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Existing Respondents

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(C)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Existing Respondents that keep records but do not submit reports

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(D)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Existing Respondents That Are Also New Respondents

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(E)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Respondents
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(E=A+B+C-D)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Average

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      [1] New respondents include sources with constructed and reconstructed affected facilities.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Column D is subtracted to avoid double-counting respondents. As shown above, the average Number of Respondents over the 3-year period of this ICR is 7.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The total number of annual responses per year is calculated using the following table:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Annual Responses

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(A)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Information Collection Activity

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Respondents

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(C)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Responses

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(D)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Existing Respondents That Keep Records But Do Not Submit Reports

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(E)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Annual Responses
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
E=(BxC)+D
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification of 5-year performance test/retest
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Report of performance test/retest
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Semiannual compliance reports
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
18.32
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The number of Total Annual Responses is 18.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The total annual labor costs are $95,500.  Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost  -  NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Renewal).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      6(e)  Bottom Line Burden Hours and Cost Tables
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The detailed bottom line burden hours and cost calculations for the respondents and the Agency are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively, and summarized below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (i) Respondent Tally
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The total annual labor hours are 1,470. Details regarding these estimates may be found below in Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost  -  NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Amendments).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      We assume that burdens for managerial tasks take 5% of the time required for technical tasks because the typical tasks for managers are to review and approve reports. Clerical burdens are assumed to take 10% of the time required for technical tasks because the typical duties of clerical staff are to proofread the reports, make copies, and maintain records.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Furthermore, the annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 82 hours per response.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The total annual capital/startup and O&M costs to the regulated entity are $0. The cost calculations are detailed in Section 6(b)(iii), Capital/Startup vs. Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Costs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
            (ii) The Agency Tally
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The average annual Agency burden and cost over the next 3 years is estimated to be 180 labor hours at a cost of $8,400. See Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost  -  NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Renewal).
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      We assume that burdens for managerial tasks take 5% of the time required for technical tasks because the typical tasks for managers are to review and approve reports. Clerical burdens are assumed to take 10% of the time required for technical tasks because the typical duties of clerical staff are to proofread the reports, make copies, and maintain records.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      6(f)  Reasons for Change in Burden
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

      This ICR is prepared for amendments to the NESHAP for Wet-Formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR, Part 63, Subpart HHHH). These amendments: (1) adjust references to the Part 63 General Provisions (40 CFR, Part 63, Subpart A) and revise provisions in the NESHAP (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) to remove the SSM exemption and SSM plan and periodic report requirements; (2) require electronic submittal of performance test results; (3) reduce the frequency of compliance reports from a quarterly basis to a semiannual basis when there are deviations from applicable standards; (4) reduce the parameter monitoring and recording requirements during use of binder containing no HAP; and (5) make technical and editorial changes. Where applicable, adjustments for these amendments are reflected in Tables 1 and 2 of this ICR.

      The number of facilities subject to the standards changed based on consultation with industry representatives and state/local agencies. Consolidation within the industry and instances where facilities reduced their HAP emissions to below major source thresholds prior to the compliance date reduced the number of affected facilities to seven that are currently subject to the standards. Five facilities have one affected drying and curing oven each and two facilities have two affected drying and curing ovens each.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Costs per labor hour increased due to increases in labor rates. In addition, the burden estimate for reading and understanding the rule requirements was adjusted to reflect the time it would take industry to review the amended rule, including becoming familiar with the new requirement to electronically submit performance test results. Burden estimates were removed for developing SSM plans and submitting periodic SSM reports. We estimate that the burden associated with the separate recordkeeping requirements for periods of SSM that are being removed to be approximately the same as the burden associated with the recordkeeping requirements for deviations from rule requirements and, therefore, did not adjust burden for recordkeeping and semiannual compliance reporting. The burden estimate for performance test report submittal was not adjusted to account for the new requirement that results of performance tests would be reported electronically through CEDRI using the ERT. The burden estimate of four hours in the current ICR for paper format submittal of performance test results is an appropriate estimate for electronic submittal of performance test results. The burden estimate for reducing the frequency of compliance reports from a quarterly basis to a semiannual basis for facilities with instances of failing to meet applicable standards was not adjusted because the burden estimate in the current ICR is already based on semiannual reporting and does not, therefore, need adjusting. There also was no adjustment in burden for reducing the parameter monitoring and recording requirements during use of binder containing no HAP because it is not known if, or how often, binder containing no HAP will be used.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      6(g)  Burden Statement
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 83 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The OMB Control Numbers for EPA regulations are listed at 40 CFR Part 9 and 48 CFR Chapter 15.

	To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy of the provided burden estimates, and any suggested methods for minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection techniques, the EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0309. An electronic version of the public docket is available at http://www.regulations.gov/, which may be used to obtain a copy of the draft collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. When in the system, select "search," then key in the docket ID number identified in this document. The documents are also available for public viewing at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW, Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number for the docket center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Send comments to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20503. Please include the EPA Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OAR-2004-0309 and OMB Control Number 2060-0496 in any correspondence.

Part B of the Supporting Statement

This part is not applicable because no statistical methods were used in collecting this information.

Table 1: Annual Respondent Burden and Cost  -  NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Amendments)

                                  Burden item
                                     (A)
                          Person-hours per occurrence
                                      (B)
                  No. Of occurrences per respondent per year
                                     (C)
                     Person-hours per respondent per year
                                    (C=AxB)
                                     (D)
                           Respondents per year [a]
                                     (E)
                    Technical person-hours per year (E=CxD)
                 (F) Management person-hours per year (Ex0.05)
                  (G) Clerical person-hours per year (Ex0.1)
                                  (H) Cost,
                                     $ [b]
1.  Applications
                                      N/A

2.  Survey and studies
                                      N/A

3.  Reporting requirements

  A.  Read and understand rule requirements [c]
                                       8
                                       1
                                       8
                                     2.33
                                     18.64
                                     0.93
                                     1.86
                                                                      $1,390.24
  B.  Required activities

      Initial performance tests [d]
                                      200
                                       1
                                      200
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                             $0
      5-year performance test [d]
                                      221
                                       1
                                      221
                                      1.8
                                     397.8
                                     19.89
                                     39.78
                                                                     $29,678.07
      Repeat of performance test [d]
                                      221
                                       1
                                      221
                                     0.36
                                     79.56
                                     3.98
                                     7.96
                                                                      $5,936.02
      Monitoring of operations and equipment [e]
                                    See 4E

      Operation, maintenance, monitoring plan
                                      40
                                       1
                                      40
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                             $0
   C. Create information
                                    See 3B

   D.  Gather existing information
                                    See 3B

   E.  Write report a, [d]

      Notification of construction/reconstruction
                                       2
                                       1
                                       2
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                             $0
      Notification of actual startup
                                       2
                                       1
                                       2
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                             $0
      Notification of applicability of standard
                                       2
                                       1
                                       2
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                             $0
      Notification of performance test/retest
                                       2
                                       1
                                       2
                                     2.16
                                     4.32
                                     0.22
                                     0.43
                                                                        $322.71
      Notification of compliance status
                                       2
                                       1
                                       2
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                             $0
      Report of performance test/retest (through CEDRI using ERT) [f]
                                       4
                                       1
                                       4
                                     2.16
                                     8.64
                                     0.43
                                     0.86
                                                                        $644.19
      Semiannual compliance report with instances of failure to meet applicable standards [g]
                                      16
                                       2
                                      32
                                      1.4
                                     44.8
                                     2.24
                                     4.48
                                                                      $3,342.33
      Semiannual compliance report with no instances of failure to meet applicable standards [g]
                                       8
                                       2
                                      16
                                      5.6
                                     89.6
                                     4.48
                                     8.96
                                                                      $6,684.65
Subtotal for Reporting Requirements

                                    739.86
                                                                     $47,998.21
4.  Recordkeeping Requirements

  A.  Read instructions
See 3A

  B.  Plan activities
See 3B

  C.  Implement activities
See 3B

  D.  Develop record system
N/A

  E.  Time to enter and transmit all information required by the rule [h]
                                     1.75
                                      52
                                      91
                                       7
                                      637
                                     31.85
                                     63.7
                                                                     $47,523.70
  F.  Time to train personnel
N/A

  G. Time for audits
N/A

Subtotal for Recordkeeping Requirements

                                    732.55
                                                                     $47,523.70
TOTAL LABOR BURDEN AND COSTS

                                    1472.41
                                                                     $95,521.91
 (Rounded) [i,j]

                                     1470
                                                                       $95,500
Capital and O&M Cost (see Section 6(b)(iii)):

                                                                          $0.00
TOTAL COST:

                                                                        $95,500

Assumptions:
[a]  There are an estimated 7 respondents (i.e., wet-formed fiberglass mat production facilities), 5 with one production line and 2 with two lines, which are subject to this standard. We have assumed that there will be no new lines constructed over the 3-year period of this ICR.
[b] This ICR uses the following labor rates: $64.37 per hour for Technical labor, $123.27 per hour for Executive, Administrative, and Managerial labor, and $40.72 per hour for Clerical labor. These rates are from the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics survey titled May 2016 National Occupational Employment and Wage Estimates United States." The rates are from column 8, "Mean hourly wage." The rates have been increased by 110% to account for the benefit packages available to those employed by private industry.
[c] We estimate that it will take the respondent 8 hours to read and understand amended rule requirements, including the new requirement to electronically submit performance test results; this is a one-time requirement (7 respondents/3 years = 2.33).
[d] We have assumed that all sources are in compliance with initial rule requirements including the initial performance test. The rule requires a performance test every 5 years since the initial test was conducted. We have estimated that each performance test will take approximately 21 hours to complete it since sources will be using EPA Method 316, 318, or 320 to measure formaldehyde and applicable test methods specified in the NESHAP to determine resin free-formaldehyde content and the loss-on-ignition of the fiberglass mat. In addition, we have assumed that it will take approximately 200 hours to conduct the pretest survey, equipment calibration, and sample analysis and report preparation for a total of 221 hours per performance test. We have further assumed that 20 percent of the performance tests fail and will have to be repeated. These estimates include CMS performance evaluation requirements. There are an estimated 7 respondents (with 9 affected drying/curing ovens). On average each year, the number of respondents conducting the performance test is 1.8 (9 / 5 = 1.8) and conducting a repeat performance test is 0.36 (1.8 x 0.20).
[e] Monitoring of operations include: 1) monitoring operating parameters for control equipment (i.e., thermal oxidizer or other control equipment); 2) urea-formaldehyde (UF) resin solids application rate; 3) resin-free formaldehyde content; 4) loss-on-ignition; 5) UF-to-latex ratio in the binder; 6) weight of the final mat product per roofing square; and 7) average nonwoven wet-formed fiberglass mat production rate (roofing square per hour).
[f] There are an estimated 7 respondents (with 9 affected drying/curing ovens). On average each year, the number of respondents conducting a performance test or repeat performance test and electronically submitting their test results is 2.16 (1.8 tests + 0.36 retests).
[g] We have assumed that approximately 80 percent of the 7 respondents (or 5.6) will report no instances of failure to meet applicable standards twice a year and approximately 20 percent (or 1.4) will report instances of failure to meet applicable standards twice a year.
[h] We have assumed it takes each source approximately 1.75 hours per week to record and transmit the information and that a year will consist of 52 weeks.
[i] Totals have been rounded to 2 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
[j] The numbers used in the text for the final totals should be rounded values.
Table 2: Average Annual EPA Burden and Cost  -  NESHAP for Wet-formed Fiberglass Mat Production (40 CFR Part 63, Subpart HHHH) (Amendments)

                                   Activity
                                      (A)
                        EPA person-hours per occurrence
                                      (B)
                     No. of occurrences per plant per year
                                      (C)
                  EPA person-hours per plant per year (C=AxB)
                                      (D)
                                  Plants Per
                                   Year [a]
                  (E) Technical person-hours per year (E=CxD)
                 (F) Management person-hours per year (Ex0.05)
                  (G) Clerical person-hours per year (Ex0.10)
                                      (H)
                                  Cost, $ [b]
Review initial notifications: construction/reconstruction, startup, applicability, compliance status [a]
                                       2
                                       1
                                       2
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                       0
                                                                            $0
Review notification of 5-year performance test/retest [c]
                                       2
                                       1
                                       2
                                     2.16
                                     4.32
                                     0.22
                                     0.43
                                                                        $233.16
Review performance test/retest reports [c]
                                       8
                                       1
                                       8
                                     2.16
                                     17.28
                                     0.86
                                     1.73
                                                                        $931.56
Semiannual compliance report with instances of failure to meet applicable standards [d]
                                      16
                                       2
                                      32
                                      1.4
                                     44.8
                                     2.24
                                     4.48
                                                                      $2,415.70
Semiannual compliance report with no instances of failure to meet applicable standards [d]
                                       8
                                       2
                                      16
                                      5.6
                                     89.6
                                     4.48
                                     8.96
                                                                      $4,831.41
TOTAL ANNUAL BURDEN AND COST

                                     179.4
                                                                     $8,411.83
(rounded) e, [f]

                                      180
                                                                        $8,400

Assumptions:
[a] There are an estimated 7 respondents (i.e., wet-formed fiberglass mat production facilities), 5 with one production line and 2 with two lines, which are subject to this standard. We have assumed that all sources are in compliance with initial rule requirements and that there will be no new lines constructed over the 3-year period of this ICR.
[b] This cost is based on the following labor rates which incorporates a 1.6 benefits multiplication factor to account for government overhead expenses: Technical rate of $48.08 (GS-12, Step 1, $30.05 + 60%), Managerial rate of $64.80 (GS-13, Step 5, $40.50 + 60%), and Clerical rate of $26.02 (GS-6, Step 3, $16.26 + 60%). These rates are from the OPM "2017 General Schedule" which excludes locality rates of pay.
[c] The rule requires a performance test every 5 years since the initial test was conducted. We have assumed that 20 percent of the performance tests fail and will have to be repeated. There are an estimated 7 respondents (with 9 affected drying/curing ovens). On average each year, the number of respondents conducting the performance test is 1.8 (9 / 5 = 1.8) and conducting a repeat performance test is 0.36 (1.8 x 0.20).
[d] We have assumed that approximately 80 percent of the 7 respondents (or 5.6) will report no instances of failure to meet applicable standards twice a year and approximately 20 percent (or 1.4) will report instances of failure to meet applicable standards twice a year.
[e] Totals have been rounded to 2 significant figures. Figures may not add exactly due to rounding.
[f] The numbers used in the text for the final totals should be rounded values.