[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 98 (Friday, May 20, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 31885-31887]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11845]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0189; FRL-9946-61-Region 3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Control of Volatile Organic Compound Emissions From
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a revision to the Pennsylvania state implementation plan (SIP)
submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. This SIP revision
pertains to Pennsylvania's regulation for fiberglass boat manufacturing
materials found in section 129.74 of the Pennsylvania Code. This
regulation meets the requirement to adopt reasonably available control
technology (RACT) for sources covered by EPA's control techniques
guidelines (CTG) standards for fiberglass boat manufacturing materials.
EPA is, therefore, proposing approval of the revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air
Act (CAA).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before June 20, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2016-0189 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the Web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Irene Shandruk,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides that SIPs for nonattainment
areas must include reasonably available control measures (RACM),
including RACT, for sources of emissions. Section 182(b)(2)(A) provides
that for certain nonattainment areas, states must revise their SIPs to
include RACT for sources of volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions
covered by a CTG document issued after November 15, 1990 and prior to
the area's date of attainment. EPA defines RACT as ``the lowest
emission limitation that a particular source is capable of meeting by
the application of control technology that is reasonably available
considering technological and economic feasibility.'' 44 FR 53761
(September 17, 1979). In subsequent Federal Register notices, EPA has
addressed how states can meet the RACT requirements of the CAA.
    CTGs are intended to provide state and local air pollution control
authorities information that should assist them in determining RACT for
VOCs from various sources of fiberglass boat manufacturing. EPA has not
published a previous CTG for fiberglass boat manufacturing materials,
but did publish an assessment of VOC emissions from fiberglass boat
manufacturing in 1990. The 1990 assessment defined the nature and scope
of VOC emissions from fiberglass boat manufacturing, characterized the
industry, estimated per plant and national VOC emissions, and
identified and evaluated potential control options. In 2001, EPA
promulgated the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Boat Manufacturing, 40 CFR part 63, subpart VVVV (2001
NESHAP). The 2001 NESHAP established organic hazardous air pollutant
(HAP) emissions limits based on low-HAP resins and gel coats and low-
emitting resin application technology. Several of the air pollution
control districts in California have specific regulations that control
VOC emissions from fiberglass boat manufacturing operations as part of
their regulations for limiting VOC emissions from polyester resin
operations. Several other states also have regulations that address VOC
emissions from fiberglass boat manufacturing as part of polyester resin
operations. After reviewing the 1990 VOC assessment, the 2001 NESHAP,
and existing California district and other state VOC emission reduction
approaches, and after considering information obtained since the
issuance of the 2001 NESHAP, EPA developed a CTG entitled Control
Techniques Guidelines for Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials
(Publication No. EPA 453/R-08-004; September 2008).
    The CTG for fiberglass boat manufacturing materials provides
control recommendations for reducing VOC emissions from the use of gel
coats, resins, and materials used to clean application equipment in
fiberglass boat manufacturing operations. This CTG applies to
facilities that manufacture hulls or decks of boats from fiberglass, or
build molds to make fiberglass boat hulls or decks. EPA's 2008 CTG
recommends that the following operations should be covered: Open
molding resin and gel coat operations (these include pigmented gel
coat, clear gel coat, production resin, tooling gel coat, and tooling
resin); resin and gel coat mixing operations; and resin and gel coat
application equipment cleaning operations.
    EPA's 2008 CTG recommends the following VOC reduction measures: VOC
emission limits for molding resins and gel coats; work practices for
resin and gel coat mixing containers; and VOC content and vapor
pressure limits for cleaning materials. Recommended VOC emission limits
for open molding resin and gel coat operations are shown in Table 1. A
more detailed explanation for determining the VOC emission limits for
molding resin and gel coats can be found in the Technical Support
Document (TSD) for this rulemaking under Docket ID No. EPA-R03-OAR-
2016-0189 and available online at www.regulations.gov.

 Table 1--Monomer VOC Content Limitations for Open Molding Resin and Gel
                             Coat Operations
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Individual
                                                           monomer VOC
                                                           content or
            Materials               Application method   weight average
                                                           monomer VOC
                                                          content limit
                                                        (weight percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Production Resin.................  Atomized (spray)...                28
Production Resin.................  Nonatomized........                35
Pigmented Gel Coat...............  Any Method.........                33
Clear Gel Coat...................  Any Method.........                48
Tooling Resin....................  Atomized...........                30
Tooling Resin....................  Nonatomized........                39
Tooling Gel Coat.................  Any Method.........                40
------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Summary of SIP Revision

    On March 2, 2016, the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection (PADEP) submitted to EPA a SIP revision concerning
implementation of RACT requirements for the control of VOC emissions
from fiberglass boat manufacturing materials. Pennsylvania is adopting
EPA's CTG standards for fiberglass boat manufacturing materials,
including the emission limits found in Table 1. The regulation is
contained in 25 Pa. Code Chapter 129 (relating to standards for
sources), and this SIP revision seeks to add 25 Pa. Code section 129.74
(control of VOC emissions from fiberglass boat manufacturing materials)
to the Pennsylvania SIP. In addition to adopting EPA's CTG standards,
25 Pa. Code section 129.74 includes numerous terms and definitions to
support the interpretation of the measures, as well as work practices
for cleaning; compliance and monitoring requirements; sampling and
testing; and record keeping requirements. EPA finds the provisions in
25 Pa. Code section 129.74 identical to the CTG standards for
fiberglass boat manufacturing materials and is therefore approvable in
accordance with sections 172(c)(1) and 182(b)(2)(A) of the CAA. For
more detailed analysis by EPA of how 25 Pa. Code section 129.74
addresses the CTG, see the TSD for this rulemaking.
    This SIP revision also notes that the requirements of 25 Pa. Code
section 129.74 supersede the requirements of a RACT permit issued under
25 Pa. Code sections 129.91-129.95 prior to December 19, 2015 to the
owner or operator of a source subject to 25 Pa. Code section 129.74 to
control, reduce, or minimize VOCs from a fiberglass boat manufacturing
process, except to the extent the RACT permit contains more stringent
requirements.

III. Proposed Action

    EPA is proposing to approve the March 2, 2016 Pennsylvania SIP
revision pertaining to adding 25 Pa. Code section 129.74 to the
Pennsylvania SIP because section 129.74 meets the requirement to adopt
RACT for sources covered by EPA's CTG standards for fiberglass boat
manufacturing materials. EPA is soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered
before taking final action.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this proposed rulemaking action, EPA is proposing to include in
a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference 25 Pa. Code section 129.74 into
the Pennsylvania SIP. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
documents generally available electronically through
www.regulations.gov and/or may be viewed at the EPA Region III office
(see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this proposed rule concerning Pennsylvania's control
of VOC emissions from fiberglass boat manufacturing materials does not
have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the state, and EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 3, 2016.
Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2016-11845 Filed 5-19-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 157 (Monday, August 15, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 53912-53913]
[FR Doc No: 2016-19244]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2016-3937; Airspace Docket No. 16-AWA-1]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class C Airspace; Syracuse Hancock International
Airport, NY

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the Syracuse Hancock International Airport,
NY, Class C airspace by removing a cutout from the surface area that
was incorporated to accommodate operations at an airport that has
permanently closed.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, November 10, 2016. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
title 1, Code of Federal Regulations, part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.9 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/airtraffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.9Z at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go
to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Airspace Policy Group,
Office of Airspace Services, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it updates the description of the Class C airspace area at Syracuse
Hancock International Airport, NY.

History

    On March 28, 2016, the FAA published in the Federal Register a
notice proposing to remove a cutout from the description of the
Syracuse Hancock International Airport, NY, Class C surface area (81 FR
17113), FR Doc. 2016-06833. Interested parties were invited to
participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on
the proposal. No comments were received.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.9Z, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15,
2015. FAA Order 7400.9Z is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this final rule. FAA Order 7400.9Z lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 modifies the Syracuse Hancock International Airport Class C
airspace area by removing a cutout from the Class C surface area. The
cutout excluded the airspace within a 0.75-nautical mile radius of the
former Michael Field/Onondaga Flight School Airport. The sole purpose
of the exclusion was to allow aircraft to operate freely to and from
the airport without the need to contact air traffic control. Since the
former airport is now permanently closed, the purpose for the exclusion
no longer exists; therefore, the FAA is removing the words ``. . .
excluding that airspace within a 0.75-mile radius of Michael Field/
Onondaga Flight School Airport . . .;'' as well as the words ``Michael
Field/Onondaga Flight School Airport, NY (lat. 43[deg]10'45'' N., long.
76[deg]07'29'' W.),'' from the Class C airspace description.

    Class C airspace designations are published in paragraph 4000 of
FAA Order 7400.9Z dated August 6, 2015, and effective September 15,
2015, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR part 71.1. The Class
C airspace designation listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act, and its agency
implementing regulations in FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts:
Policies and Procedures'' regarding categorical exclusions for
procedural actions at paragraph 5-6.5a which categorically excludes
from full environmental impact review rulemaking actions that designate
or modify classes of airspace areas, airways, routes, and reporting
points. Since this action does not change the boundaries, altitudes, or
operating requirements of the Class C airspace area, and only amends
the Syracuse Hancock International Airport, NY, Class C airspace by
removing a cutout from the Class C surface area that had been
incorporated to accommodate operations at the former Michael Field/
Onondaga Flight School Airport which is now permanently closed, this
airspace action is not expected to cause any potentially significant
environmental impacts. In accordance with FAAO 1050.1F, paragraph 5-2
regarding Extraordinary Circumstances, this action has been reviewed
for factors and circumstances in which a normally categorically
excluded action may have a significant environmental impact requiring
further analysis, and it is determined that no extraordinary
circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an environmental
assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Z,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2015,
effective September 15, 2015, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 4000 Class C Airspace.

AEA NY C Syracuse Hancock International Airport, NY

Syracuse Hancock International Airport, NY
    (Lat. 43[deg]06'40'' N., long. 76[deg]06'23'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
4,400 feet MSL within a 5-mile radius of the Syracuse Hancock
International Airport; and that airspace extending upward from 1,600
feet MSL to and including 4,400 feet MSL within a 10-mile radius of
the Syracuse Hancock International Airport from the 248[deg] bearing
from the airport clockwise to the 118[deg] bearing from the airport;
and that airspace extending upward from 2,700 feet MSL to and
including 4,400 feet MSL within a 10-mile radius from the 118[deg]
bearing from the airport clockwise to the 188[deg] bearing from the
airport; and that airspace extending upward from 2,300 feet MSL to
and including 4,400 feet MSL within a 10-mile radius of the airport
from the 188[deg] bearing from the airport clockwise to the 248[deg]
bearing from the airport.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on August 8, 2016.
Leslie M. Swann,
Acting Manager, Airspace Policy Group.
[FR Doc. 2016-19244 Filed 8-12-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


ÿWPCL
ûÿ2BJ#|xÐ°°ÐÐÐÐÐØ	pÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ°ÐÐÃÃFrom: ÄÄÁØ	Ø	ÁDeborah Bartram
ÃÃTo:ÄÄÁØ	Ø<EMAIL_ADDRESS> Robin R. Bryson
ÃÃDate: ÄÄÁØ	Ø	ÁThu, Dec 20, 2007 11:30 AM
ÃÃSubject: ÄÄÁØ	Ø	ÁRe: Answers for Asheville

ÐÐ°`	¸hÀpÈ 	x
Ð (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? AøCPF¨HKXM°OR`T¸VYh[À]`°ÐÐFred and Robin,

Thank you so much for the productive call last Thursday to discuss questions on the Asheville and Roxboro plants.  I have attached documentation of the responses we discussed.  As I went back to my notes, there were just a couple of items that were unclear to me, which I've highlighted in the attached documents.  Please let me know if you have any comments or corrections to these items.

Again, thank you for your responses and I look forward to hearing from you!
Deb Bartram

_____________________________________________________
Deb Bartram
Vice President
ERG
14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200
Chantilly, VA 20151
(703) 633-1669
(703) 263-7479 fax
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
>>> "Bryson, Robin R."<EMAIL_ADDRESS>12/13/2007 2:44:43 PM >>>

Here're the answers to our action items.
(1) Design information for Secondary Settling Pond, WWT3, Table 17:
        SPD-2;  6,779 cu meter; 13.9 hrs; no lining; not dredged
(2)  Please change ash transport (CAS) flow rate into WWT3 (Ash Pond SPD1) on Diagram 1 to 2,460,000 gpd for 2006 (and all other places this value is listed).  Also adjust the ID (from LVW WWT1) to the same rate.  The other inputs into the Ash Pond not listed (because we weren't suppose to) include storm water, wastewater from the onsite CT units, and fire system.
Thanks for catching all the inconsistencies!  Let me know if there are other items I need to find out about.

Robin R. Bryson
Progress Energy Carolinas
Environmental Services
internal 8-770-3962
external<PHONE_NUMBER>

ÐÐØ	ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ°ÐÐ
ÃÃCC:ÄÄÁØ	Ø	ÁJosh Hall;  Ron Jordan;  Sarah Holman


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 201 (Thursday, October 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55663-55665]
[FR Doc No: 2019-22590]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-87272; File No. SR-CBOE-2019-090]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating
To Move the Rules in Chapter V of the Currently Effective Rulebook to
Proposed Section A of Chapter 4 of the Shell Structure for the
Exchange's Rulebook That Will Become Effective Upon the Migration of
the Exchange's Trading Platform

October 10, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 3, 2019, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to move the Rules in Chapter V of the currently effective Rulebook
(``current Rulebook''), which governs securities dealt in on the
Exchange, to proposed Section A of Chapter 4 of the shell structure for
the Exchange's Rulebook that will become effective upon the migration
of the Exchange's trading platform to the same system used by the Cboe
Affiliated Exchanges (as defined below) (``shell Rulebook''). The text
of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In 2016, the Exchange's parent company, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
(formerly named CBOE Holdings, Inc.) (``Cboe Global''), which is also
the parent company of Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (``C2''), acquired Cboe
EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA''), Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX'' or
``EDGX Options''), Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX'' or ``BZX
Options''), and Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``BYX'' and, together with
Cboe Options, C2, EDGX, EDGA, and BZX, the ``Cboe Affiliated
Exchanges''). The Cboe Affiliated Exchanges are working to align
certain system functionality, retaining only intended differences,
between the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, in the context of a technology
migration. Cboe Options intends to migrate its trading platform to the
same system used by the Cboe Affiliated Exchanges, which the Exchange
expects to complete on October 7, 2019. In connection with this
technology migration, the Exchange has a shell Rulebook that resides
alongside its current Rulebook, which shell Rulebook will contain the
Rules that

will be in place upon completion of the Cboe Options technology
migration.
    The Exchange proposes to relocate the rules in Chapter V, which
govern securities dealt in on the Exchange, to proposed Section A of
Chapter 4 in the shell Rulebook. The Exchange notes that in addition to
relocating the rules under current Chapter V to proposed Section A of
Chapter 4 in the shell Rulebook, the proposed rule change deletes the
rules from the current Rulebook. The proposed rule change relocates the
rules as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Current rule                         Proposed rule
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.1 Designation of Underlying Securities..  5.1 Designation of
                                             Securities.
4.2 Rights and Obligations of Holders and   5.2 Rights and Obligations
 Writers.                                    of Holders and Writers.
4.3 Criteria for Underlying Securities....  5.3 Criteria for Underlying
                                             Securities.
4.4 Withdrawal of Approval of Underlying    5.4 Withdrawal of Approval
 Securities.                                 of Underlying Securities.
4.5 Series of Option Contracts Open for     5.5 Series of Option
 Trading.                                    Contracts Open for Trading.
4.5(f) (Long-Term Equity Option Series      5.8 Long-Term Equity Option
 (LEAPS)).                                   Series (LEAPS).
4.6 Adjustments...........................  5.7 Adjustments.
4.7 Select Provisions of Options Listing    5.5A Select Provisions of
 Procedures Plan.                            Options Listing Procedures
                                             Plan.
4.8 Single Stock Dividend Options.........  5.9. Single Stock Dividend
                                             Options.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed changes are of a non-substantive nature and will not
amend the relocated rules other than to update their rule numbers,
conform paragraph structure and number/lettering format to that of the
shell Rulebook, and make cross-reference changes to shell rules. The
Exchange notes that the proposed change updates the heading to proposed
Rule 4.1 (current Rule 5.1) from ``Designation of Securities'' to
``Designation of Underlying Securities'' which more accurately aligns
with the other rules under current Chapter V (proposed Section A of
Chapter 4); i.e. the heading to proposed Rule 4.3 (current Rule 5.3) is
``Criteria for Underlying Securities'' and to proposed Rule 4.4
(current Rule 5.4) is ``Withdrawal of Approval of Underlying
Securities''. Finally, the proposed rule change removes Rule 5.5.11 and
.12 which cover strike intervals for BXM option series and for Cboe S&P
500 Realized Volatility option series, respectively, on which the
Exchange is authorized to list options, but on which the Exchange does
not currently, and does not intend, to list options.\3\ Because there
are currently no options listed on any of these indexes, the proposed
rule change has no impact on trading on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange is simultaneously submitting a similar rule
filing regarding current Chapter XXIV (proposed shell Section B of
Chapter 4), governing index options, which proposes to remove the
same references under current Chapter XXIV.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\4\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \5\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \6\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \6\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated, the proposed rule change makes no substantive changes to
the rules. The proposed rule change is merely intended to relocate the
Exchange's rules to the shell Rulebook and update their numbers,
paragraph structure, including number and lettering format, and cross-
references, as well as delete references to indexes on which the
Exchange does not list (and does not intend to list) options, \7\ to
conform to the shell Rulebook as a whole in anticipation of the
technology migration on October 7, 2019. As such, the proposed rule
change is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general to protect
investors and the public interest, by improving the way the Exchange's
Rulebook is organized, making it easier to read, and, particularly,
helping market participants better understand the rules of the
Exchange, which will also result in less burdensome and more efficient
regulatory compliance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See supra note 3. The deletion of these indexes will conform
to the other proposed Sections under Chapter 4, and thus, the shell
Rulebook as a whole.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not
intended as a competitive change, but rather, seeks to make non-
substantive rule changes in relocating the rules and updating cross-
references, as well as references to certain indexes, to shell rules in
anticipation of the October 7, 2019 technology migration. The Exchange
also does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
undue burden on competition because the relocated rule text is exactly
the same as the Exchange's current rules, all of which have all been
previously filed with the Commission.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it

was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest,
the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Commission has waived that requirement in this case.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \12\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\13\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed
rule change may become operative immediately. The Exchange notes that
the proposed rule change is merely relocating certain rules to its
shell rulebook--which includes corresponding updates to rule numbers,
cross-references, and other references--in order to conform these rules
to the shell rulebook upon the technology migration explained above.
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will make its rules
easier to read and understand for all investors. The Exchange also
asserts that the relocation of the rules explained above will not
impose any significant burden on competition as the substance of the
rules remains unchanged. The Commission agrees that allowing this
proposed rule change to become operative upon filing in order to
facilitate the Exchange's technology migration--without changing the
substance of these Exchange Rules--is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. For this reason, the Commission
hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposal
operative upon filing.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2019-090 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-090. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2019-090, and should be submitted
on or before November 7, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12), (59).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-22590 Filed 10-16-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Coal Units FGD Existing ( 2010 SO2) FGD Projected ( 2010 SO2) No FGD ( 2010 SO2) Total ( 2010 SO2))

BART 445,906 607,558 3,407,064 4,460,528 Not BART 696,490 226,025 4,311,719 5,234,234 All Units 1,142,396 833,583 7,718,783 9,694,762 Existing and Planned SO2 Controls ( FGD) at Coal Fired Electric Generating Units ( Pre BART)

0 2,000,000 4,000,000 6,000,000 8,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 BART Not BART All Units Coal EGUs Total 2010 SO2 Emissions (

Tons) No FGD ( 2010 SO2)

FGD Projected ( 2010 SO2)

FGD Existing ( 2010 SO2) Coal Units FGD Existing ( 2010 SO2) FGD Projected ( 2010 SO2) No FGD ( 2010 SO2) Total ( 2010 SO2)

BART 445,906 916,725 0 1,362,631 Not BART 696,490 226,025 4,311,719 5,234,234 All Units 1,142,396 1,142,750 4,311,719 6,596,865 NOTE: The compliance costs for BART Units were calculated in the context of two scenarios.

The first, as shown above ( Worksheet Post BART 1), incorporates IPM assumptions.

The second scenario ( Worksheet Post BART 2) modifies the analysis by assuming LSFO ( 95% control) for all units greater than 550 MW with a sulfur content less than 2%, instead of LSD ( 90% control) as assumed in the first scenario.

Existing and Planned SO2 Controls ( FGD)

at Coal Fired Electric Generating Units ( Post BART)

IPM Assumptions for FGD Type 0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 BART Not BART All Units Coal EGUs Total 2010 SO2 Emissions (

Tons) No FGD ( 2010 SO2)

FGD Projected ( 2010 SO2)

FGD Existing ( 2010 SO2) Coal Units FGD Existing ( 2010 SO2) FGD Projected ( 2010 SO2) No FGD ( 2010 SO2) Total ( 2010 SO2)

BART 445,906 778,741 0 1,224,647 Not BART 696,490 226,025 4,311,719 5,234,234 All Units 1,142,396 1,004,766 4,311,719 6,458,881 NOTE: The compliance costs for BART Units were calculated in the context of two scenarios.

The first, ( Worksheet Post BART 1), incorporates IPM assumptions.

The second scenario, as shown above ( Worksheet Post BART 2), modifies the analysis by assuming LSFO ( 95% control) for all units greater than 550 MW with a sulfur content less than 2%, instead of LSD ( 90% control) as assumed in the first scenario.

Existing and Planned SO2 Controls ( FGD)

at Coal Fired Electric Generating Units ( Post BART)

IPM Assumptions for FGD Type ( with LSFO for Units > 550 MW)

0 1,000,000 2,000,000 3,000,000 4,000,000 5,000,000 6,000,000 7,000,000 BART Not BART All Units Coal EGUs Total 2010 SO2 Emissions (

Tons) No FGD ( 2010 SO2)

FGD Projected ( 2010 SO2)

FGD Existing ( 2010 SO2)


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 196 (Tuesday, October 11, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 62802]
[FR Doc No: 2011-26117]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12715-003]

Fairlawn Hydroelectric Company, LLC; Notice of Availability of
Environmental Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations, 18 CFR part
380, the Office of Energy Projects has reviewed the application for an
original license for the proposed 14,000-kilowatt (kW) Jennings
Randolph Hydroelectric Project located on the North Branch Potomac
River in Garrett County, Maryland and Mineral County, West Virginia, at
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) Jennings Randolph Dam and has
prepared an environmental assessment (EA). In the EA, Commission staff
assess the potential environmental effects of licensing the project and
conclude that issuing a license for the project, with appropriate
environmental measures, would not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the EA is on file with the Commission and is available
for public inspection. The final EA may also be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at (866)
208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    Comments on the EA should be filed within 30 days from the issuance
date of this notice, and should be addressed to the Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Room 1-A,
Washington, DC 20426. Please affix ``Jennings Randolph Hydroelectric
Project No. 12715-003'' to all comments. Comments may be filed
electronically via Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission strongly
encourages electronic filings.
    See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the
Commission's Web site under the ``eFiling'' link. For further
information contact Allyson Conner at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 3, 2011.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-26117 Filed 10-7-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 52 (Thursday, March 17, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15234-15235]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05646]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP22-62-000]

Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC; Notice of Request Under Blanket
Authorization and Establishing Intervention and Protest Deadline

    Take notice that on March 2, 2022, Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC,
700 Louisiana Street, Suite 1300, Houston, TX 77002-2700 filed in the
above referenced docket a prior notice pursuant to Section 157.205 and
157.216 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's regulations under
the Natural Gas Act, requesting authorization to abandon one injection/
withdrawal well and associated pipelines and appurtenances, located in
its Coco C Storage Field in Kanawha County, West Virginia (2022 Coco C
Well 7330 Abandonment Project or Project). Columbia proposes to abandon
these facilities under authorities granted by its blanket certificate
issued in Docket No. CP83-76-000.\1\ The proposed abandonments will
have no impact on Columbia's existing customers or affect Columbia's
existing storage operations. The estimated cost for the Project is
approximately $1.0 million, all as more fully set forth in the request
which is on file with the Commission and open to public inspection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation (predecessor to
Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC), 22 FERC ] 62,029 (1983).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://ferc.gov) using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application should be directed to
Dave Hammel, Director, Commercial & Regulatory Law,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected], Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC, 700 Louisiana
Street, Suite 1300, Houston, TX 77002-2700.
    Pursuant to Section 157.9 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure,\2\ within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will
either: complete its environmental review and place it into the
Commission's public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule
for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff's issuance of
the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or environmental
assessment (EA) for this proposal. The filing of an EA in the
Commission's public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a
Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify
federal and state agencies of the timing for the completion of all
necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal
authorizations within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission
staff's FEIS or EA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ 18 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations) 157.9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Public Participation

    There are three ways to become involved in the Commission's review
of this project: You can file a protest to the project, you can file a
motion to intervene in the proceeding, and you can file comments on the
project. There is no fee or cost for filing protests, motions to
intervene, or comments. The deadline for filing protests, motions to
intervene, and comments is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 10, 2022. How
to file protests, motions to intervene, and comments is explained
below.

Protests

    Pursuant to section 157.205 of the Commission's regulations under
the NGA,\3\ any person \4\ or the Commission's staff may file a protest
to the request. If no protest is filed within the time allowed or if a
protest is filed and then withdrawn within 30 days after the allowed
time for filing a protest, the proposed activity shall be deemed to be
authorized effective the day after the time allowed for protest. If a
protest is filed and not withdrawn within 30 days after the time
allowed for filing a protest, the instant request for authorization
will be considered by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ 18 CFR 157.205.
    \4\ Persons include individuals, organizations, businesses,
municipalities, and other entities. 18 CFR 385.102(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Protests must comply with the requirements specified in section
157.205(e) of the Commission's regulations,\5\ and must be submitted by
the protest deadline, which is May 10, 2022. A protest may also serve
as a motion to intervene so long as the protestor states it also seeks
to be an intervenor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 18 CFR 157.205(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Interventions

    Any person has the option to file a motion to intervene in this
proceeding. Only intervenors have the right to request rehearing of
Commission orders issued in this proceeding and to subsequently
challenge the Commission's orders in the U.S. Circuit Courts of Appeal.
    To intervene, you must submit a motion to intervene to the
Commission in accordance with Rule 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure \6\ and the regulations under the NGA \7\ by the
intervention deadline for the project, which is May 10, 2022. As
described further in Rule 214, your motion to intervene must state, to
the extent known, your position regarding the proceeding, as well as
your interest in the proceeding. For an individual, this could include
your status as a landowner, ratepayer, resident of an

impacted community, or recreationist. You do not need to have property
directly impacted by the project in order to intervene. For more
information about motions to intervene, refer to the FERC website at
https://www.ferc.gov/resources/guides/how-to/intervene.asp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 18 CFR 385.214.
    \7\ 18 CFR 157.10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    All timely, unopposed motions to intervene are automatically
granted by operation of Rule 214(c)(1). Motions to intervene that are
filed after the intervention deadline are untimely and may be denied.
Any late-filed motion to intervene must show good cause for being late
and must explain why the time limitation should be waived and provide
justification by reference to factors set forth in Rule 214(d) of the
Commission's Rules and Regulations. A person obtaining party status
will be placed on the service list maintained by the Secretary of the
Commission and will receive copies (paper or electronic) of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties.

Comments

    Any person wishing to comment on the project may do so. The
Commission considers all comments received about the project in
determining the appropriate action to be taken. To ensure that your
comments are timely and properly recorded, please submit your comments
on or before May 10, 2022. The filing of a comment alone will not serve
to make the filer a party to the proceeding. To become a party, you
must intervene in the proceeding.

How To File Protests, Interventions, and Comments

    There are two ways to submit protests, motions to intervene, and
comments. In both instances, please reference the Project docket number
CP22-62-000 in your submission.
    (1) You may file your protest, motion to intervene, and comments by
using the Commission's eFiling feature, which is located on the
Commission's website (www.ferc.gov) under the link to Documents and
Filings. New eFiling users must first create an account by clicking on
``eRegister.'' You will be asked to select the type of filing you are
making; first select ``General'' and then select ``Protest'',
``Intervention'', or ``Comment on a Filing''; or \8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Additionally, you may file your comments electronically by
using the eComment feature, which is located on the Commission's
website at www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings.
Using eComment is an easy method for interested persons to submit
brief, text-only comments on a project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) You can file a paper copy of your submission by mailing it to
the address below.\9\ Your submission must reference the Project docket
number CP22-62-000.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Hand-delivered submissions in docketed proceedings should be
delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225 Wilkins Avenue,
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To mail via USPS, use the following address: Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
    To mail via any other courier, use the following address: Kimberly
D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
    The Commission encourages electronic filing of submissions (option
1 above) and has eFiling staff available to assist you at (202) 502-
8258 or [email protected]
    Protests and motions to intervene must be served on the applicant
either by mail or email (with a link to the document) at:
[email protected], 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 1300, Houston, TX
77002-2700. Any subsequent submissions by an intervenor must be served
on the applicant and all other parties to the proceeding. Contact
information for parties can be downloaded from the service list at the
eService link on FERC Online.

Tracking the Proceeding

    Throughout the proceeding, additional information about the project
will be available from the Commission's Office of External Affairs, at
(866) 208-FERC, or on the FERC website at www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link as described above. The eLibrary link also provides
access to the texts of all formal documents issued by the Commission,
such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. For more information and to register, go to
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.

    Dated: March 11, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-05646 Filed 3-16-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 220 (Monday, November 16, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 70778]
[FR Doc No: 2015-29157]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. TX16-1-000]

Public Service Company of Oklahoma: Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on November 6, 2015, pursuant to sections 210, 211
and 212 of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824i, 824j and 824k (2012)
and Part 36 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission)
Regulations, 18 CFR part 36 (2015), Public Service Company of Oklahoma
requests the Commission to issue orders to implement a proposed
arrangement to enable the provision of black start service between the
Electric Reliability Council of Texas and the Southwest Power Pool
regions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on November 27, 2015.

     Dated: November 9, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-29157 Filed 11-13-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Addressing Lead Based Paint Hazards During Renovation,

Remodeling, and Rehabilitation in Federally Owned and Assisted Housing 1 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Introduction and Welcome 2 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Introduction Overview  Introductions  Meeting facility and logistics  Course objective  Course manual  Course agenda 3 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Course Objectives

Minimize creation and dispersal of lead contaminated dust and debris during   Renovation and Remodeling   Rehabilitation   Maintenance

Protect residents, especially children, from exposure to lead contaminated dust and debris   Set up and Containment   Safe Work Practices   Clean up and Clearance 4 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development This Course...

Is one of several courses that will enable you to perform R& R work in federally funded housing

Is not an abatement course

Satisfies general lead training requirements of HUD   Provides an introduction to the OSHA lead in construction standard   Comprehensive treatment of OSHA requirements requires additional training

May not satisfy state and local training requirements 5 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Training Manual Overview  Five modules  Interactive exercises  Appendices  Lead Paint Safety Field Guide 6 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Course Agenda 7 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module 1 Why Should I Be Concerned About Lead Contaminated Dust? 1 1 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module 1 Overview  Exercise  Why is lead contaminated dust a problem?

 Health risks and effects of lead?

 What is lead based paint?

 How many homes contain lead based paint?

 What is the government doing about leadbased paint?

 Summary 1 2 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Why Are Dust and Debris a Problem?

 Dust and debris can contain lead  Lead contaminated dust and debris are poisonous  Small amounts of lead contaminated dust can poison children and adults   Children swallow it during ordinary play activities   Adults swallow or breathe it during work activities  Workers can bring lead contaminated dust home and poison their families 1 3 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Complete Module One Exercise 1 4 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Health Risks of Lead  Very hazardous to children   Reading and learning difficulties   Behavioral problems   Difficulty paying attention and hyperactivity   May result in seizures, coma, and death  Hazardous to pregnant women   Damage to fetus  Also hazardous to workers and other adults   Loss of sex drive   Physical fatigue 1 5 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Lead Poisoning  Lead poisoning does not always have obvious symptoms   Symptoms are easily misdiagnosed, thus delaying effective treatment and increasing likelihood of permanent physical and mental damage   The primary way to determine lead poisoning is to take a blood lead level test. 1 6 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development What Is Lead Based Paint?

 Lead based paint is   Any paint or surface coating that contains at least 0.5%

lead or 5,000 ppm by dry weight or 1.0 mg/ cm2   Some states regulate paint with different concentrations of lead  Why was lead used in paint?

  Primary pigment   Added color   Durability and corrosion control   Drying agent 1 7 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development How Widespread is Lead in Housing?

Year House Was Built Percent of Houses with Lead Based Paint Before 1940 87 percent 1940 1959 69 percent 1960 1978 All Housing 24 percent 40 percent 1 8 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development What Is Being Done About Lead?

 Lead based paint was banned from residential use in 1978  Programs affecting renovation, remodeling, and rehabilitation   EPA: Contractors distribute lead pamphlet before renovation   HUD: Grants for Lead Hazard Control in private low income housing;

Lead Safe Housing Rule for Federally owned or assisted housing   HUD and EPA: Disclosure before lease or sale   OSHA: Worker protection standards for lead in construction   CDC: Testing children's blood

Education

Local government programs and regulations 1 9 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Title X (" Ten") and Implementing Regulations  The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 ( Title X of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992)

 Goals:

  To reduce and prevent childhood lead poisoning   To ensure that LBP hazards are integrated into government housing policies   Encourage promising and cost effective methods of hazard reduction   Educate the public 1 10 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Title X  Section 402 ( c)

Renovation and Remodeling  Requires EPA to:

  Develop guidelines for the conduct of renovation and remodeling activities which may create a risk of exposure to dangerous levels of lead   Study the extent to which people engaged in renovation and remodeling activities are exposed to lead, or disturb lead and create a lead based paint hazard   Revise lead based paint activities regulations to apply them to renovation and remodeling activities that create a lead based paint hazard 1 11 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development EPA Training and Certification ( Sections 402/ 404)

 Individuals performing specified lead based paint activities must be trained in EPA or State accredited training programs and certified. EPA certifies the following disciplines:

 Inspector   Risk Assessor   Project Designer   Abatement Worker   Abatement Supervisor 1 12 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Title X  Section 406( b)

 Lead hazard information pamphlet   800 424 LEAD   www. epa. gov/ lead   www. hud. gov/ offices/ lead  Renovation of pre 1978 housing:

Renovators, multi family housing owners, managers receiving compensation shall provide the lead hazard control pamphlet to the owner and/ or occupant prior to such activity. 1 13 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Title X  Section 406( b) ( cont.)

 No more than 60 days before the start of the activity; at least 7 days if sending by certified mail

Written acknowledgement; records retention for 3 years

Covers work in the dwelling unit, common areas

Exemptions: repairs of areas less than or equal to 2 ft2 , emergency renovations or written documentation of no LBP via certified inspector 1 14 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Title X  Section 1018  The HUD/ EPA Disclosure Rule requires:

  " Protect Your Family from Lead in Your Home" pamphlet be given to people before they lease or buy pre 1978 housing   Renovators give this same pamphlet before starting work   Sellers or landlords disclose information about any known lead based paint or lead based paint hazards before selling or renting a home.

  Buyers have up to 10 days to check for lead hazards 1 15 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD's Lead Safe Housing Rule

Pre 1978 housing receiving HUD or other Federal assistance

Pre 1978 Federally owned housing being sold

Required activities vary by type of assistance 1 16 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD's Lead Safe Housing Rule: Interim Controls  Training requirements for personnel  Includes occupant protection and clearance  Activities include:

  Paint stabilization   Friction or impact surfaces   Chewable surfaces   Dust lead hazard control   Soil lead hazard control 1 17 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD's Lead Safe Housing Rule: Safe Work Practices  Included in:

  Ongoing LBP Maintenance   Paint stabilization   Rehabilitation   Standard treatments  Prohibited methods  Occupant protection and worksite preparation  Specialized cleaning  De minimis levels ( 24 CFR 35.1350) 1 18 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD's Lead Safe Housing Rule: Clearance Examination  Visual Assessment  Dust sampling   Interim Dust Lead standards   Will be changed to EPA's standards when effective  Certified, or trained and supervised personnel 1 19 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD's Lead Safe Housing Rule: Dust Lead Standards HUD uses these clearance standards:

 Floors 40 µ g/ ft2  Interior window sills 250 µ g/ ft2  Window troughs 400 µ g/ ft2 Need to clean carefully to meet these standards.

1 20 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Know The HUD Rule!

You may obtain a copy of the regulation from NLIC at ( 1 800 424 LEAD) to ensure an understanding of the requirements. 1 21 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD's Lead Hazard Control Grant Program  Targeted to private homes owned or occupied by low income families  Since 1993, the program has:

  Provided 177 grants totaling $ 552 million to 112 State and local governments in 35 states and DC   Educated families on how to eliminate or reduce children's lead exposure. 1 22 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Occupational Health and Safety Administration ( OSHA) Lead Regulations

29 CFR 1926.62 Lead in Construction

29 CFR 1926.59 Hazard Communication for Construction

29 CFR 1910.1200 Hazard Communication for General Industry

Other Construction Safety Standards 1 23 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development OSHA Lead in Construction Standard Requirements are exposure based and taskbased The regulation covers:

 Demolishing or salvaging structures where lead or materials containing lead are present  Removing, encapsulating or enclosing materials containing lead 1 24 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Construction Standard:

Scope  New construction, altering, repairing, or renovating structures or substrates ( or portions of them) that contain lead or materials containing lead  Installing products containing lead  Contamination or emergency clean up 1 25 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Construction Standard:

Scope ( cont.)

 Transporting, disposing, storing or containing lead or materials containing lead where construction activities are performed;

 Maintenance operations associated with the activities mentioned above 1 26 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Construction Standard:

Key Concepts  Competent Person  Exposure Assessment  Action Level: 30 µ g/ m ³ of lead in air  Permissible Exposure Limit ( PEL):

50 µ g/ m ³ of lead in air 1 27 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Employer Requirements:

Action Level and PEL   At or Above the Action Level ° Training & Medical Surveillance Required   Above the PEL, or for " Trigger Tasks"

If employees exposed above PEL, or do Group 1, 2 or 3 work until exposure assessment is completed, the employer must provide:

° Housekeeping ° Respiratory Protection, Protective Clothing/ Equip.

° Hygiene Facilities ( showers, if feasible)

° Medical Surveillance ( blood tests reviewed by doctor)

° Medical Removal ( if blood lead level too high)

° Employee Information and Training 1 28 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Construction Standard:

Additional Provisions  Compliance plan  Signs for work above the PEL  Record keeping  Monitoring observation 1 29 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Additional OSHA Regulations 1 30  Respiratory Protection:

29 CFR 1910.134  Personal Protective Equipment:

29 CFR 1910.132  Sanitation: 29 CFR 1926.27  Other construction safety standards U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Lead Information Resources  EPA  < www. epa. gov/ lead>

 HUD Lead Web site  < www. hud. gov/ offices/ lead>

 OSHA  < www. osha. gov>

 National Lead Information Center   Copies of the regulation   1 800 424 LEAD  Lead professionals listing   < www. leadlisting. org> 1 31 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module Summary  Now you know   Why we are concerned with lead contaminated dust   The health risks of lead to children and adults   The regulations that affect lead based paint 1 32 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module 2 Talking to Clients and Planning Work 2 1 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module 2 Overview  At the end of this module, you will be able to answer the following questions:

  Do I need to use lead safe work practices?

  How can I communicate information about the associated planning, cost, and time demands to the residents?

  Should the paint be tested before starting work? 2 2 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development What are Your Supervisor's or Agency's Responsibilities?

Under federal law, if disturbing more than 2 sq. ft. of painted surfaces in pre 1978 housing, you MUST:

  Give residents copies of the pamphlet Protect Your Family From Lead In Your Home ( see attachments)

  Get confirmation that residents received the pamphlet   Keep confirmation records for three years

See The Lead Pre Renovation Education Rule ( 40 CFR Part 745) or Lead Based Paint Poisoning Prevention In Certain Residential Structures ( 24 CFR Part 35) for confirmation forms and guidance ( see attachments) 2 3 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Talking About Your Skills  Why are you using lead safe work practices?

  Keep the house safe   Protect health of children and pregnant women   Good professionalism  Why are you qualified to conduct these activities?

  Completed this course   Use lead safe tools and supplies   Experience with lead safe work practices 2 4 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Discussing the Work Plan  Discussing the work plan with residents   Coordinate with program administrators and supervisors   What lead safe work practices are planned?

  How will this work affect the residents' use of the house?

  How will you protect the residents' possessions from lead dust contamination?

  What activities will you expect the residents to perform before you begin your work? 2 5 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Why Evaluate the Job for Lead?

 Reduce your potential liability from lead dust  Incorporate lead activities into your work schedule  Use lead safe work practices  Have the right materials and equipment  Include the cost of lead safe work practices  Discuss occupant protection with residents  OSHA regulations require employers to determine if employees will be exposed 2 6 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Evaluating the Property  Was the residential building constructed before 1978?

  If yes, take proper action and use lead safe work practices   If no, you do not have to worry about lead dust.

 Has the paint been tested for lead?

  If yes, collect documentation of what and where 2 7 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Evaluating the Work  Will this job:

  Disturb painted surfaces?

  Otherwise create or disturb lead dust?

 If yes, take proper precautions:

  Pre cleaning   Set up   Work practices   Clean up   Clearance  Will this job create high levels of dust? 2 8 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Scheduling Work  How will I schedule lead safe work practices?

  Minimize hassle to residents   Limit the size of the work area   Minimize labor costs  Take high dust jobs into account 2 9 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development How Will Lead Affect the Job?

 How much extra time will the lead safe work practices take?

  Talking with client   Set up   Work   Clean up  What elements of the job can increase costs?

  Labor   Supplies ( see checklist in Module 4) 2 10 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module 3 Setting Up Your Workspace to Contain Lead Dust 3 1 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module 3 Overview  What is containment?

 High Dust Activities   Hand scraping large areas   Demolition 3 2 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development What Is Containment?

 Keeping lead contaminated dust in the work area  Benefits of containment   Protects residents and workers   Easier clean up at the end of the job   More likely to pass clearance  Not required for working on areas below de minimis levels 3 3 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Current Interior Set Up Practices Spread Lead Contaminated Dust

Reusable drop cloth

Furniture in the room

Open doors and windows

Broom or shop vacuum Do not use on jobs where lead is present!

3 4 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Overview of Interior Set Up Steps  Step 1: Limit access  Step 2: Cover belongings that cannot be moved out  Step 3: Cover floors  Step 4: Close windows, doors, and HVAC system  Special consideration for high dust jobs  Not needed for jobs below HUD's de minimis levels of areas to be disturbed 3 5 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Job Set Up Toolkit 3 6 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Interior Set Up Step 1:

Limit Access  Instruct residents to stay away from work area  Do not allow young children ( under 6 years) or pets near work area  Place a barrier or tape across entrances   Do not allow eating,

drinking, or smoking in the work area 3 7 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Interior Set Up Step 2:

Cover Belongings Cover furniture and objects in protective sheeting   Furniture   Carpet   Lamps, pictures, and other fixtures 3 8 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Interior Set Up Step 3:

Cover Floors

Cover floors with protective sheeting   At least five feet on all sides of work area   2nd smaller layer if using chemical strippers   Place a tack pad at edge of protective sheeting, lay protective sheeting on frequently used walking paths to outdoors and bathrooms 5'

5' 3 9 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Interior Set Up Step 4:

Close Windows, Doors, HVAC  Close and seal windows and doors  Close and seal HVAC vents 3 10 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Special Considerations for Interior High Dust Jobs

Remove furniture,

fixtures and belongings from work area

Cover door openings with 2 layers of protective sheeting to form an " airlock"

Close and cover HVAC vents 3 11 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Special Considerations For Interior High Dust Jobs

For work on removable objects that create lots of dust

Select a room that can be easily closed off   Follow Steps 1 through 4 for interior set up   Follow the procedures for high dust jobs

Do the work off site 3 12 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Current Exterior Set Up Practices Spread Lead Contaminated Dust

Ground uncovered

Reusable drop cloth

Paint chips

No barriers

Windows and doors open These practices can poison children! 3 13 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Overview of Exterior Set up Steps  Step 1: Establish work area  Step 2: Close windows and doors and keep closed  Not needed for jobs below HUD's de minimis levels of areas to be disturbed 3 14 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Exterior Set Up Step 1:

Establish Work Area

Cover the ground with protective sheeting   If space permits, extend at least 10 feet from work area   Cover nearby vegetable gardens and children's play areas

Limit work area access   Establish a 20 foot perimeter around work area if space permits 3 15 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Exterior Set Up Step 2:

Close Windows & Doors

Close nearby doors and windows within 20 feet of the work area 3 16 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Complete Module 3 Exercises U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module 4 Safe Work Practices 4 1 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module 4 Overview  Prohibited Practices  Safe work practices to perform work  Tools and supplies you may need  Basic steps to protect yourself  Control the spread of dust  Exercise  Summary 4 2 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Typical Lead Dust Creation 4 3 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Practices Prohibited by HUD in Federally Owned and Assisted Housing

Open flame burning or torching

Machine sanding, grinding, abrasive blasting, or sandblasting without HEPA exhaust

Heat gun above 1,100 degrees Fahrenheit

Extensive dry scraping and dry sanding

Paint stripping in a poorly ventilated space using a volatile stripper that is a hazardous substance 4 4 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Safe Work Practice Alternatives to HUD's Prohibited Practices Prohibited Safe

 Open flame burning or torching   Wet scraping and sanding,

chemical stripping, heat gun below 1,100 degrees F

 Heat gun on high ( 1,100+

degrees F)   Heat gun below 1,100 degrees F

 Dry scraping and sanding   Wet scraping and sanding

 Power sanding, grinding,

abrasive blasting without attachment to HEPA vacuum   Use of power tools with attachment to HEPA vacuum 4 5 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development More Safe Work Practices  Mist before drilling and cutting ( hand tools only)

 Score paint  Minimize pounding and hammering  pry and pull instead  Mist surroundings 4 6 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Benefits of Safe Work Practices  Protect your family by not bringing dust home with you  Enhance reputation for knowledge and professionalism  Reduce resident exposure to lead  Simplify daily and final cleanup  Help protect workers from inhaling dust  Protect children 4 7 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Safe Work Practices Toolkit:

Tools, Equipment, and Supplies  Wet/ dry sandpaper, sanding sponge ( block)

 Mist bottle, pump sprayer  Tape ( painter's, duct, masking)

 Heavy duty plastic sheeting, such as 4 6 mil  Chemical stripper  Garbage bags and duct tape  Utility knife  Heat gun  Vacuum with HEPA filter 4 8 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Safe Work Practices Toolkit:

HEPA Filtered Power Tools  Large jobs may require special tools   Power sanders, grinders, planers, shavers with HEPA filter vacuum attachment   These tools increase productivity 4 9 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Protect Yourself  Workers should wear   Painter's hat  helps keep dust out of hair   Disposable or washable coveralls   Can be reused if not ripped   Launder separately   Disposable N 100 rated respirator ( dusty jobs)

  Gloves ( during certain tasks, i. e. High Dust Jobs)

 Wash face and hands frequently   Helps to reduce hand to mouth ingestion of lead dust  OSHA may require more protection 4 10 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Safe Work Practices Toolkit:

Tools, Equipment, and Supplies  Disposable hand towels  Pre moistened disposable wipes  Painter's hats  Gloves  Coveralls  Disposable booties  N 100 rated disposable respirators where appropriate 4 11 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Control the Spread of Dust

When you leave the work area   Remove booties   HEPA vacuum or wipe shoes  use tack mat   Remove coveralls or HEPA vacuum clothes

At the end of the day, don't take lead home to your family on your clothes or in your car   HEPA vacuum clothes, shoes   Change your clothes and dispose or place in plastic bag to wash separately from household laundry   Wash hands, face   Shower as soon as you get home 4 12 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Cleaning During the Job  A clean work site reduces the spread of dust and paint chips  Clean as you work   HEPA vacuum horizontal surfaces   Remove debris frequently   Remove paint chips as they are created   As building components are removed, wrap and dispose of them promptly  Clean frequently ( in stages, at least daily) 4 13 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module 4 Exercises  Objective  Exercise A   Evaluate a scenario   Plan Activities  Objective  Exercise B   Evaluate a scenario   Identify potential activities that create dust   Identify steps you can take to minimize dust, and   Talk to clients about the potential lead dangers from the work  Use checklist 4 14 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Summary  Class discussion   List key safe work practices and equipment 4 15 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development 5 1 Module 5 Clean Up and Check Your Work U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Module 5 Overview  What is effective clean up?

 Cleaning tools  Interior cleaning techniques  Exterior cleaning techniques  How to check your work and achieve clearance  Safe disposal methods 5 2 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development What is Effective Clean Up?

 Containing dust during clean up to the area that will be cleaned  Using proper cleaning techniques  Cleaning all surfaces, tools and clothing  Checking your work  clearance examination   Visual assessment   Clearance testing  Safe and secure disposal 5 3 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Clean Up Toolkit

Vacuum with HEPA filter

Misting bottle and pump sprayer

Mop with disposable heads

Detergent

Two buckets or two sided bucket

Disposable hand towels

Heavy duty garbage bags

Duct tape

Shovel and rake 5 4 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Interior Clean Up Techniques  Clean up all paint chips and debris  Pick up protective sheeting   Mist sheeting before folding   Fold dirty side inward   Tape shut to seal in dirty side  Dispose of protective sheeting at end of job 5 5 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Interior Clean Up Techniques

HEPA Vac work area from high to low   Start with walls, tops of doors, window troughs   HEPA Vac at least two feet beyond contained area

Wet clean from high to low   Change cloths and rinse water often   Clean the floor last

Clearance testing at end of job 5 6 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Interior Checking Your Work

Conduct a visual inspection after cleaning   Focus on child access areas such as floors, window troughs,

window sills   Look for paint chips, dust, debris, and deteriorated paint   Inspect beyond work area   Repeat clean up steps if necessary

Clearance testing at end of job ensures property is now safe for children   Required when work is above de minimis levels in federally assisted housing.

  If area fails clearance, re clean and retest. 5 7 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Exterior Clean Up Techniques

For high dust jobs mist area to keep dust down

Visually inspect work area   Look for dust, debris, and paint chips   Focus on child access areas such as:

  Window sills   Bare soil and ground   Play areas 5 8 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Exterior Clean Up Techniques  Pick up protective sheeting   Collect and dispose of any debris or chips on sheeting   HEPA vacuum sheeting   Clean sheeting until it passes visual inspection   Dispose of sheeting properly  Visually inspect beyond work area 5 9 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Exterior Checking your Work  Visual inspection   Always conduct a visual inspection after any cleaning   Focus on child access areas such as   Bare soil or ground   Window sills   Exterior porches   Play areas   Inspect beyond work area  Collect and dispose all paint chips, dust,

debris, and deteriorated paint 5 10 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development HUD Requirements in Federally Assisted Housing  For work on pre 1978 housing or buildings that have not been found to be free of lead based paint,

the unit must pass clearance if the work is above the de minimis levels.

 A clearance examiner will:

  Conduct visual inspection of the work area or unit   Interior and exterior   Take dust samples from   Floors   Windows   Provide a written report with results   Be certified or have work approved by a certified inspector or risk assessor 5 11 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Disposal

What should I do with my waste?

At the work site   Place waste in heavy duty plastic bags such as 4 6 mil poly bag   " Gooseneck Seal" the bag with duct tape   Carefully dispose of waste in accordance with state and federal regulations   Store waste in secure area. 5 12 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Disposal  Local and Federal Information

Separate residential architectural components from hazardous waste

Segregate hazardous and non hazardous waste

Minimize hazardous waste

Always check State regulations! 5 13 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Keep In Mind

Schedule time to clean thoroughly at the end of each day

Assign responsibilities to specific personnel

Create and maintain a checklist for cleaning procedures

Always maintain sufficient cleaning and disposal supplies

Achieve Clearance 5 14 U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Appendix 10 Supervisory and Business Issues U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Lesson Overview  Key supervisor responsibilities  Benefits of performing work in a lead safe manner U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Key Supervisor Responsibilities  Stay informed  Ensure job performance  Manage liability  Manage works  Maintain records U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Stay Informed  State and local regulations pertaining to LBP  OSHA requirements for worker safety  Waste management and disposal requirements U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Job Performance  Skill building  Tool kits  Planning  Client education U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Tool Kits  Setup  PPE  Safe Work Practices  Clean Up U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Liability Management  Four methods to limit liability   Achieve and document clearance   Contract modifications   Quality control   Insurance  Failure to comply with applicable regulations could expose contractors to liability  Voluntary work practices presented in this training may create a new legal standard U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Scope of Work for Proposal  Lead Paint Safety Field Guide  Model Specifications  HUD Guidelines  Associations U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Insurance  General liability insurance   Certain state and local laws may require it   Most policies contain a pollution exclusion clause  Pollution liability insurance  Errors and omissions insurance   Typically for consultants, risk assessors, inspectors U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Work Crew Management  Personal protection equipment  Match work crew skills to job requirements   Lead and non lead work environments  Daily oversight   Daily quality control   Daily checking on cleaning U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Records Maintenance  Pamphlet   Record of providing Protect Your Family From Lead In Your Home pamphlet required under the 406( b) rule  Recommend review with client the punch list of work completed U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Benefits of Using LBP Safe Practices  Reduced liability exposure  Increased employee morale   Safer work sites   Better worker health  Marketing benefit   Differentiation from other contractors   Generate positive word of mouth and publicity   Market as higher quality work   Provide clients with peace of mind


[Federal Register: May 31, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 104)]
[Notices]
[Page 30904]
[DOCID:fr31my06-69]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-361-000]

Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline, L.L.C.; Notice of Proposed
Changes in FERC Gas Tariff

May 23, 2006.
    Take notice that on May 17, 2006, Maritimes & Northeast Pipeline,
L.L.C. (Maritimes) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
First Revised Volume No. 1, the tariff sheets attached to Appendix B to
the filing, with an effective date of November 1, 2008.
    Maritimes states that it is also filing a negotiated rate letter
agreement and a firm service agreement under Rate Schedule MN365,
attached to Appendix A to the filing, both will become effective
November 1, 2008, or the date on which service commences on Maritimes'
Phase IV Project facilities.
    Maritimes states that copies of its filing have been mailed or, if
requested, emailed to all affected customers and interested state
commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-8332 Filed 5-30-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P