equipment leaks) are below certain health effects thresholds. If
sources demonstrate that risks are below these levels, then the
requirements of proposed Option 2, if finalized, would not apply to
them. Possible models for health-based approaches to use for HON
sources are contained in 40 CFR part 63, subparts DDDD (Plywood and
Composite Wood Products Manufacture NESHAP) and DDDDD (Industrial/
Commercial/Institutional Boilers and Process Heaters NESHAP).
    Each facility that would choose to use the ``Low-risk'' approach
would be required to determine maximum hourly emissions under worst-
case operations and conduct a site-specific risk assessment that
demonstrates that the HON CMPUs at the facility do not cause a maximum
individual lifetime cancer risk exceeding 1-in-1 million, an HI

greater than 1, or any adverse environmental impacts.
    For the risk assessment, facilities would be allowed to use any
scientifically-accepted, peer-reviewed risk assessment methodology. An
example of one approach for performing a site-specific compliance
demonstration for air toxics can be found in the EPA's ``Air Toxics
Risk Assessment Reference Library, Volume 2, Site-Specific Risk
Assessment Technical Resource Document'', which may be obtained through
the EPA's Air Toxics Web site at http://www.epa.gov/ttn/fera/risk_atoxic.html
.

    At a minimum, the site-specific alternative compliance
demonstration would have to:
     Estimate long-term inhalation exposures through the
estimation of annual or multi-year average ambient concentrations;
     Estimate the inhalation exposure for the individual most
exposed to the facility's emissions;
     Use site-specific, quality-assured data wherever possible;
     Use health-protective default assumptions wherever site-
specific data are not available, and;
     Document adequately the data and methods used for the
assessment so that it is transparent and can be reproduced by an
experienced risk assessor and emissions measurement expert.
    To ensure compliance with the ``Low-risk'' alternative compliance
demonstration, emission rates from the approved demonstration would be
required to be included the facility's Title V permit as Federally
enforceable emission limits. EPA requests comment on the possible means
for approving such demonstrations (e.g., by EPA affirmative review, by
the State permitting authority, by EPA audit, by third-party, or by
self-certification plus EPA audit), and on the risk thresholds that
would be used for the basis of compliance demonstration. We are also
requesting comment on the method of peer review for the site-specific
risk assessments. We also request comment on the legal authority for
such an approach, under sections 112(f)(2) and 112(d)(6), of tailoring
the further emissions reduction requirement to apply only where it is
specifically necessary to reduce risks to levels that assure public
health is protected with an ample margin of safety.
3. Gas Imaging Equipment
    The HON currently requires that emissions from leaking equipment be
controlled using a leak detect and repair program (LDAR). The primary
work practice currently employed to detect leaking equipment requires
the use of a portable instrument to detect leaks of VOC or HAP at the
leak interface of the equipment component. The instrument must meet the
performance specifications of EPA Reference Method 21.
    Under section 112(d)(6) of the CAA, EPA has the general authority
to review and amend its regulations as appropriate and to provide
additional work practice alternatives as new technology becomes
available. In recent years, a new technology, known as gas imaging, has
been developed that could be used to detect leaking components. The
effective use of gas imaging technology may significantly reduce the
costs of LDAR programs because owners or operators will be able to
reduce the time necessary to monitor a component. The technology may
also allow the identification of larger leaks more quickly than Method
21, thereby, allowing them to be repaired quicker, and ultimately
decrease emissions.
    Currently available gas imaging technologies fall into two general
classes: active and passive. The active type uses a laser beam that is
reflected by the background. The attenuation of the laser beam due to
passing through a hydrocarbon cloud provides the optical image. The
passive type uses ambient illumination to detect the difference in heat
radiance of the hydrocarbon cloud.
    The principle of operation of the active system is the production
of an optical image by reflected (backscattered) laser light, where the
laser wavelength is such that it is absorbed by the gas of interest.
The system would illuminate the process unit with infrared light and a
video camera-type scanner picks up the backscattered infrared light.
The camera converts this backscattered infrared light to an electronic
signal, which is displayed in real-time as an image. Since the scanner
is only sensitive to illumination from the infrared light source and
not the sun, the camera is capable of displaying an image in either day
or night conditions.
    The passive instrument has a tuned optical lens, which is in some
respects like ``night-vision'' glasses. It selects and displays a video
image of light of a particular frequency range and filters out the
light outside of that frequency range. In one design, by superimposing
the filtered light (at a frequency that displays VOC gas) on a normal
video screen, the instrument (or camera) displays the VOC cloud in real
time in relationship to the surrounding process equipment. The operator
can see a plume of VOC gas emanating from a leak.
    We are requesting comment on the appropriateness of allowing gas
imaging technology as an alternative work practice for identifying
leaking components. While gas imaging may be applicable to monitor
leaking components at many source categories, we are specifically
requesting comment on the application of gas imaging technology to
CPMUs regulated by the HON.
4. Monitoring, Applicability, Implementation, and Compliance
    Based on issues which have arisen over the past 14 years through
inspections, requests for clarification, and discussions with industry,
EPA has identified the following areas for which we solicit comments
relating to monitoring, applicability, implementation, and compliance
with the rule.
    Liquid Streams from Control Devices: The EPA is clarifying that
liquid streams generated from control devices (e.g., scrubber effluent)
are wastewater. Since the concept of wastewater does not exist until
the point of determination (i.e., where the liquid stream exits the
CMPU), and a control device (e.g., scrubber) is not specifically
defined as part of the CMPU as a control device, there is an
inconsistent understanding in the industry as to whether wastewater
provisions apply.
    Non-continuous Gas Streams from Continuous Operations: The EPA is
clarifying that non-continuous vents from continuous HON unit
operations (i.e., reactors, distillation units, and air oxidation
units) are subject to the HON if they are generated during the course
of startup, shutdown, or malfunction. These are currently not
specifically defined by either the HON or the MON since they are
generated from continuous operations and are not batch process vents as
defined in 40 CFR 63.101 or covered by 40 CFR 63.100(j)(4).
    Boiler Requirements versus Fuel Gas System Requirements: The EPA
solicits comment as to whether the need exists to have exclusions for
boilers and exclusions for fuel gas systems. The EPA also proposes to
include monitoring provisions and/or certifications that the boilers
are compliant.
    Group Status Changes for Wastewater: The Agency proposes to include
language similar to 40 CFR 63.115(e), which requires a redetermination
of TRE of process vents if process or operational changes occur for
wastewater. Although Sec.  63.100(m)

generally applies to Group 2 wastewater streams becoming Group 1,
explicit language similar to Sec.  63.115(e) that would require
redetermination of group status for wastewater does not exist.
    Leaking Components Found Outside of Regularly Scheduled Monitoring
Periods: On October 12, 2004, the EPA issued a formal determination to
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality clarifying that subpart H
of the HON requires that leaks found outside of the regularly scheduled
monitoring period must be repaired, recorded, and reported as leaking
components. The EPA proposes to incorporate clarifying edits to subpart
H to make this explicit in the regulation.
    Redetermination of Primary Product: Unlike other rules, such as the
NESHAP for Polymers and Resins IV (40 CFR part 63, subpart JJJ), the
HON does not have specific provisions for performing a periodic
redetermination for a primary product. The EPA has issued formal
applicability determinations for site specific situations clarifying
that, at the point that a facility meets the applicability of the rule,
they would be subject to the rule regardless of the lack of specific
provisions for periodic redeterminations. The EPA proposes to codify
procedures and compliance schedules for flexible operating units which
have a change in primary product. The EPA intends to model the HON
provisions after the NESHAP for Polymers and Resins IV which requires
annual redetermination of a primary product for equipment which is not
originally designated as part of a HON CMPU, but which produces HON
products. Therefore, compliance with the HON for a flexible operating
unit which previously produced a non-HON primary product would be
required to be in compliance with the HON immediately upon
determination that the primary product is a HON product.
    Common Recovery Devices for Wastewater: The EPA clarifies that
liquid streams routed to a recovery device receiving streams from
multiple CMPU's would be wastewater. Under the HON, the concept of
recovery is tied integrally to a specific CMPU. Additionally, a common
recovery device serving multiple CMPU's would, by definition, be
outside the CMPU. Therefore, streams routed to it would be considered
wastewater discharged from the CMPU.
    Net Positive Heating Value: The EPA proposes to define ``net
positive heating value'' to incorporate the concept that, for fuel
value, the stream must provide useful energy by using less energy to
combust and produce a stable flame than would be derived from it. This
difference must have a positive value when used in the context of
``recovering chemicals for fuel value'' (e.g., in the definition of
``recovery device'').
    Pressure Testing for Equipment Leaks: Based on field inspections,
the Agency has found a poor correlation between the results of batch
pressure testing and Method 21 results. It has been the Agency's
experience that high leak rates are found by Method 21 results on
components which routinely pass either a gas or liquid pressure test.
Additionally, the annual pressure test frequency does not adequately
address leaking components which are not otherwise disturbed and
required to be tested on a more frequent basis. The Agency proposes to
change the frequency of the pressure testing to quarterly and
supplement the pressure tests with a statistical sample of Method 21
results.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Because this notice proposes two options for rulemaking, the
analysis conducted and determinations made in this section of the
preamble are based on the option with the higher cost and regulatory
burden.

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under E.O. 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), EPA must determine
whether the regulatory action is ``significant,'' and therefore,
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and the
requirements of the E.O. The E.O. defines a ``significant regulatory
action'' as one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
    (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
    (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
    (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
    (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the E.O.
    An economic impact analysis was performed to estimate changes in
prices and output for affected HON sources and their consumers using
the annual compliance costs estimated for proposed Option 2. This
option would impose the highest costs of the alternatives considered.
All estimates are for the fifth year after promulgation.
    The price increases from the market reactions to the HON compliance
costs are less than 0.02 percent, and the output changes are less than
0.01 percent. The affected output in this case includes major chemical
and petroleum feedstocks for use in major chemical and refinery
production. The small reductions in price and output reflect the
relatively low cost of the proposal relative to the size of the
affected industries. The overall annual social costs, which reflect
changes in consumer and producer behavior in response to the compliance
costs, are $3.77 million (2004 dollars). For more information, refer to
the economic impact analysis report that is in the public docket for
this rule.
    Pursuant to the terms of E.O. 12866, this proposed rule has been
determined to be a ``significant regulatory action'' because it raises
novel legal and policy issues. The EPA has submitted this action to OMB
for review. Changes made in response to OMB suggestions or
recommendations will be documented in the public record.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The information collection requirements in this proposed rule have
been submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. An
Information Collection Request (ICR) document prepared by EPA has been
assigned EPA ICR number 2222.01 and OMB Control Number XXXX-XXXX.
    The ICR estimates the increased burden to industry that results
from the proposed standards. Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purpose of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements; train personnel to respond to a
collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the
collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
    For this rule, the increased burden is associated with developing
and maintaining Group 2 storage vessel emission determinations and TRE

determinations for Group 2 process vents, and recording and maintaining
equipment leak information. The projected hour burden is 4,500 hours at
a cost of $104,000.
    An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in 40 CFR part 63 are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
    To comment on the Agency's need for this information, the accuracy
of the provided burden estimate, and any suggested method for
minimizing respondent burden, including the use of automated collection
techniques, EPA has established a public docket for this rule, which
includes this ICR, under Docket ID number EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0475. Submit
any comments related to the ICR for this proposed rule to EPA and OMB.
See ADDRESSES section at the beginning of this notice for where to
submit comments to EPA. Send comments to OMB at the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget,
725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503, Attention: Desk Office for
EPA. Since OMB is required to make a decision concerning the ICR
between 30 and 60 days after June 14, 2006, a comment to OMB is best
assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it by July 14, 2006.
The final rule will respond to any OMB or public comments on the
information collection requirements contained in this notice.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small
businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
    For the purposes of assessing the impacts of the proposed rule on
small entities, small entity is defined as, (1) a small business as
defined by the Small Business Administration (SBA); (2) a small
governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town,
school district or special district with a population of less than
50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit
enterprise that is independently owned and operated and is not dominant
in its field.
    For sources subject to this proposed rule, the relevant NAICS and
associated employee sizes are listed below:

NAICS 32511--Petrochemical Manufacturing--1,000 employees or fewer.
NAICS 325192--Cyclic Crudes and Intermediates Manufacturing--750
employees or fewer.
NAICS 325199--All Other Organic Chemical Manufacturing--1,000 employees
or fewer.

    After considering the economic impacts of this proposal on small
entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The small
entities directly regulated by this proposed rule are businesses within
the NAICS codes mentioned above. There are 51 ultimate parent
businesses that will be affected by this proposal. Three of these
businesses are small according to the SBA small business size
standards. None of these three small firms will have an annualized
compliance cost of more than 0.03 percent of sales associated with
meeting the requirements of this proposed rule. For more information on
the small entity impacts, please refer to the economic impact and small
business analyses in the rulemaking docket.
    Although the proposed rules will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, EPA nonetheless tried
to reduce the impact of the proposed rule on small entities. When
developing the HON proposal, EPA took special steps to ensure that the
burdens imposed on small entities were reasonable. Our economic
analysis indicates compliance costs are reasonable and no other adverse
impacts are expected to the affected small businesses. The proposed
rule will therefore not impose any significant additional regulatory
costs on affected small entities.
    We continue to be interested in the potential impacts of the
proposed rule on small entities and welcome comments on issues related
to such impacts.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), Public
Law 104-4, establishes requirements for Federal Agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on State, local, and tribal
governments and the private sector. Under section 202 of the UMRA, EPA
generally must prepare a written statement, including a cost-benefit
analysis, for proposed and final rules with ``Federal mandates'' that
may result in expenditures to State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or to the private sector, of $100 million or more in any
one year. Before promulgating an EPA rule for which a written statement
is needed, section 205 of the UMRA generally requires EPA to identify
and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and adopt
the least costly, most cost-effective, or least-burdensome alternative
that achieves the objectives of the rule. The provisions of section 205
do not apply when they are inconsistent with applicable law. Moreover,
section 205 allows us to adopt an alternative other than the least-
costly, most cost-effective, or least-burdensome alternative if the
Administrator publishes with the final rule an explanation why that
alternative was not adopted. Before we establish any regulatory
requirements that may significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, including Tribal governments, it must have developed under
section 203 of the UMRA a small government agency plan. The plan must
provide for notifying potentially affected small governments, enabling
officials of affected small governments to have meaningful and timely
input in the development of EPA regulatory proposals with significant
Federal intergovernmental mandates, and informing, educating, and
advising small governments on compliance with the regulatory
requirements.
    The proposed rule contains no Federal mandates (under the
regulatory provisions of title II of the UMRA) for State, local, or
tribal governments or the private sector. We have determined that the
proposed rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or to the private sector in any one
year. The total capital costs for this proposed rule are approximately
$14 million and the total annual costs are approximately $13 million.
Thus, the proposed rule is not subject to the requirements of sections
202 and 205 of the UMRA.
    The EPA has determined that this action contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small
governments because it contains no requirements that apply to such
governments or impose obligations upon them. Therefore, the proposed
rule is not subject to section 203 of the UMRA.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999) requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely
input by

State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have federalism implications.'' ``Policies that have Federalism
implications'' is defined in the E.O. to include regulations that have
``substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    The proposed rule does not have Federalism implications. It will
not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
as specified in E.O. 13132. None of the affected SOCMI facilities are
owned or operated by State governments. Thus, E.O. 13132 does not apply
to the proposed rule.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000) requires EPA
to develop an accountable process to ensure ``meaningful and timely
input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies
that have tribal implications.''
    The proposed rule does not have tribal implications, as specified
in E.O. 13175. It will not have substantial direct effects on tribal
governments, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. No tribal governments
own SOCMI facilities subject to the HON. Thus, E.O. 13175 does not
apply to the proposed rule.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health and Safety Risks

    Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) applies to any
rule that: (1) Is determined to be ``economically significant'' as
defined under E.O. 12866, and (2) concerns an environmental health or
safety risk that EPA has reason to believe may have a disproportionate
effect on children. If the regulatory action meets both criteria, the
Agency must evaluate the environmental health or safety risk of the
planned rule on children and explain why the planned regulation is
preferable to other potentially effective and reasonably feasible
alternatives considered by the Agency.
    The proposed rule is not subject to the E.O. because it is not
economically significant as defined in E.O. 12866, and because the
Agency does not have reason to believe the environmental health or
safety risks addressed by this action present a disproportionate risk
to children. This conclusion is based on our assessment of the
information on the effects on human health and exposures associated
with SOCMI operations.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    Today's final decision is not a ``significant energy action'' as
defined in E.O. 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. Further, we have concluded that today's
final decision is not likely to have any adverse energy impacts.

I. National Technology Transfer Advancement Act

    Section 112(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note),
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. The VCS are technical
standards. (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by
VCS bodies. The NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through OMB,
explanations when the Agency decides not to use available and
applicable VCS.
    The proposed rule revisions do not include technical standards
beyond those already provided under the current rule. Therefore, EPA is
not considering the use of any VCS.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898, ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations,'' requires
Federal agencies to consider the impact of programs, policies, and
activities on minority populations and low-income populations.
According to EPA guidance, agencies are to assess whether minority or
low-income populations face risks or a rate of exposure to hazards that
are significant and that ``appreciably exceed or is likely to
appreciably exceed the risk or rate to the general population or to the
appropriate comparison group.'' (EPA, 1998)
    The Agency has recently reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring
environmental justice for all people, regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income level. To ensure environmental justice, we
assert that we shall integrate environmental justice considerations
into all of our programs and policies, and, to this end have identified
eight national environmental justice priorities. One of the priorities
is to reduce exposure to air toxics. Since some HON facilities are
located near minority and low-income populations, we request comment on
the implications of environmental justice concerns relative to the two
options proposed. While no exposed person would experience unacceptable
risks under either of the proposed options, the distribution of risks
is lower under option 2 than option 1 as reflected in table 3 of this
preamble. We note, however, that the distributional impacts of the cost
of option 2 were not quantified in our economic analysis.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 63

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hazardous
substances, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 1, 2006.
Stephen L. Johnson,
Administrator.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the
Code of Federal Regulations is proposed to be amended as follows:

PART 63--[AMENDED]

    1. The authority citation for part 63 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.

Subpart F--[Amended]

    2. Amend Sec.  63.100 by:
    a. Revising paragraph (k) introductory text;
    b. Revising paragraph (m) introductory text; and
    c. Adding paragraph (r) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.100  Applicability and designation of source.

* * * * *
    (k) Except as provided in paragraphs (l), (m), (p), and (r) of this
section, sources subject to subparts F, G, or H of this part are
required to achieve compliance on or before the dates specified in
paragraphs (k)(1) through (k)(8) of this section.
* * * * *
    (m) Before [DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL

REGISTER], if a change that does not meet the criteria in paragraph
(l)(4) of this section is made to a chemical manufacturing process unit
subject to subparts F and G of this part, and the change causes a Group
2 emission point to become a Group 1 emission point (as defined in
Sec.  63.111 of subpart G of this part), then the owner or operator
shall comply with the requirements of subpart G of this part for the
Group 1 emission point as expeditiously as practicable, but in no event
later than 3 years after the emission point becomes Group 1. After
[DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], the owner
or operator subject to this paragraph must comply with subpart G of
this part no later than three years after the emission point becomes a
Group 1 emission point (as defined in Sec.  63.111 of subpart G of this
part).
* * * * *
    (r) Compliance with standards to protect public health and the
environment. On or after [DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER], the owner or operator must comply with the
provisions of paragraphs (r)(1) and (r)(2) of this section to protect
public health and the environment.
    (1) Process vents and storage vessels. On or after [DATE THE FINAL
RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], the definitions of Group 1
process vent and Group 1 storage vessel change such that some Group 2
emission points may become Group 1 emission points. Notwithstanding the
provisions of paragraph (k) of this section, any existing Group 2
process vent or Group 2 storage vessel that becomes a Group 1 emission
point on [DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] as
a result of the revised definition must be in compliance with subparts
F and G of this part no later than [DATE THREE YEARS AFTER THE DATE THE
FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. New sources that
commence construction or reconstruction after [DATE OF PUBLICATION OF
FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] must be in compliance with subparts
F and G of this part upon start-up or by [DATE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED
IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], whichever is later.
    (2) Equipment leaks. On or after [DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED
IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], an existing chemical manufacturing process
unit containing at least one HAP from table 38 of subpart G of part 63,
that is subject to Sec.  63.168 of subpart H of this part (Standards:
Valves in gas/vapor service and light liquid service) must comply with
paragraph (k) in Sec.  63.168 of subpart H of this part no later than
[DATE ONE YEAR AFTER THE DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER]. New sources that commence construction or
reconstruction after [DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER] must be in compliance with subparts F and G of this part upon
start-up or by [DATE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER],
whichever is later.

Subpart G--[Amended]

    3. Amend Sec.  63.110 by revising paragraphs (b)(3) and (i)(1)(i)
and (ii) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.110  Applicability.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (3) On or after the compliance dates specified in Sec.  63.100 of
subpart F of this part, a Group 2 storage vessel that is also subject
to the provisions of 40 CFR part 61, subpart Y is required to comply
only with the provisions of 40 CFR part 61, subpart Y. The
recordkeeping and reporting requirements of 40 CFR part 61, subpart Y
will be accepted as compliance with the recordkeeping and reporting
requirements of this subpart. On or after [DATE THREE YEARS AFTER THE
DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], the owner or
operator must also keep records of the emissions of hazardous air
pollutants listed in table 38 of this subpart as specified in Sec.
63.123(b). New sources that commence construction or reconstruction
after [DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] must
keep records of the emissions of hazardous air pollutants listed in
table 38 of this subpart as specified in Sec.  63.123(b) upon start-up
or by [DATE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], whichever
is later.
* * * * *
    (i) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) For Group 1 and Group 2 process vents, 40 CFR part 65, subpart
D, satisfies the requirements of Sec. Sec.  63.102, 63.103, 63.112
through 63.118, 63.148, 63.151, and 63.152. On or after [DATE THREE
YEARS AFTER THE DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER], for process vents emitting a hazardous air pollutant listed
in table 38 of this subpart, a TRE value of 4.0 replaces references to
a TRE value of 1.0 in 40 CFR part 65, except in 40 CFR 65.62(c), and
requirements for Group 1 process vents in 40 CFR part 65 also apply to
Group 2A process vents. The provisions of this paragraph apply to new
sources that commence construction or reconstruction after [DATE OF
PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] upon start-up or by
[DATE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], whichever is
later.
    (ii) For Group 1 storage vessels, 40 CFR part 65, subpart C
satisfies the requirements of Sec. Sec.  63.102, 63.103, 63.112, 63.119
through 63.123, 63.148, 63.151, and 63.152. On or after [DATE THREE
YEARS AFTER THE DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER], the owner or operator must also keep records specified in
Sec.  63.123(b). New sources that commence construction or
reconstruction after [DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER] must keep records of the emissions of hazardous air
pollutants listed in table 38 of this subpart as specified in Sec.
63.123(b) upon start-up or by [DATE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER], whichever is later.
* * * * *
    4. Amend Sec.  63.111 by revising the following definitions of
Group 1 process vent, Group 2 process vent, and Group 1 storage vessel
to read as follows:

Sec.  63.111  Definitions.

* * * * *
    Group 1 process vent means a process vent for which the vent stream
flow rate is greater than or equal to 0.005 standard cubic meter per
minute, the total organic hazardous air pollutant concentration is
greater than or equal to 50 ppmv, and the total resource effectiveness
index value, calculated according to Sec.  63.115, is less than or
equal to 1.0. On or after [DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER], a Group 1 process vent also means a process vent for
which the vent stream flow rate is greater than or equal to 0.005
standard cubic meters per minute, the total organic HAP concentration
is greater than or equal to 50 ppmv, the process vent contains at least
one hazardous air pollutant listed in table 38 of this subpart, and the
total resource effectiveness index value, calculated according to Sec.
63.115, is less than or equal to 4.0.
    Group 2 process vent means a process vent that does not meet the
definition of Group 1 process vent.

    Group 1 storage vessel means a storage vessel that meets the
criteria for design storage capacity and stored-liquid maximum true
vapor pressure specified in table 5 of this subpart for storage vessels
at existing sources, and in table 6 of this subpart for storage vessels
at new sources. On or after [DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER], a Group 1 storage vessel also means a storage vessel
that stores at least 1 hazardous air pollutant listed in table 38 of
this subpart, and has a total hazardous air pollutant emission rate
greater than 4.54 megagrams per year.
* * * * *
    5. Amend Sec.  63.113 by revising paragraphs (a)(3) and (d) to read
as follows:

Sec.  63.113  Process vent provisions--reference control technology.

    (a) * * *
    (3) Comply with paragraph (a)(3)(i), (a)(3)(ii), or (a)(3)(iii) of
this section.
    (i) Prior to [DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER], achieve and maintain a TRE index value greater than 1.0 at
the outlet of the final recovery device, or prior to release of the
vent stream to the atmosphere if no recovery device is present. If the
TRE index value is greater than 1.0, the process vent shall comply with
the provisions for a Group 2 process vent specified in either paragraph
(d) or (e) of this section, whichever is applicable.
    (ii) On or after [DATE THREE YEARS AFTER THE DATE THE FINAL RULE IS
PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], for process vents containing a
hazardous air pollutant listed in table 38 of this subpart, achieve and
maintain a TRE index value greater than 4.0 at the outlet of the final
recovery device, or prior to release of the vent stream to the
atmosphere if no recovery device is present. If the TRE index value is
greater than 4.0, the process vent shall comply with the provisions for
a Group 2 process vent specified in either paragraph (d) or (e) of this
section, whichever is applicable. The provisions of this paragraph
apply to new sources that commence construction or reconstruction after
[DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] on or after
[DATE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER].
    (iii) On or after [DATE THREE YEARS AFTER THE DATE THE FINAL RULE
IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], for process vents not containing
a hazardous air pollutant listed in table 38 of this subpart, achieve
and maintain a TRE index value greater than 1.0 at the outlet of the
final recovery device, or prior to release of the vent stream to the
atmosphere if no recovery device is present. If the TRE index value is
greater than 1.0, the process vent shall comply with the provisions for
a Group 2 process vent specified in either paragraph (d) or (e) of this
section, whichever is applicable. The provisions of this paragraph
apply to new sources that commence construction or reconstruction after
[DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] upon start-
up or by [DATE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER],
whichever is later.
* * * * *
    (d) The owner or operator of a Group 2 process vent meeting the
conditions of paragraphs (d)(1) or (d)(2) shall maintain a TRE index
value greater than 1.0 and shall comply with the monitoring of recovery
device parameters in Sec.  63.114(b) or (c) of this subpart, the TRE
index calculations of Sec.  63.115 of this subpart, and the applicable
reporting and recordkeeping provisions of Sec. Sec.  63.117 and 63.118
of this subpart. Such owner or operator is not subject to any other
provisions of Sec. Sec.  63.114 through 63.118 of this subpart.
    (1) Prior to [DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER], the process vent has a flow rate greater than or equal to
0.005 standard cubic meters per minute, a hazardous air pollutant
concentration greater than or equal to 50 parts per million by volume,
and a TRE index value greater than 1.0 but less than or equal to 4.0.
    (2) On or after [DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER], the process vent does not emit any hazardous air pollutants
listed in table 38 of this subpart, but has a flow rate greater than or
equal to 0.005 standard cubic meters per minute, a hazardous air
pollutant concentration greater than or equal to 50 parts per million
by volume, and a TRE index value greater than 1.0 but less than or
equal to 4.0
* * * * *
    6. Amend Sec.  63.114 by revising paragraphs (b) introductory text
and (c)(2) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.114  Process vent provisions--monitoring requirements.

* * * * *
    (b) Each owner or operator of a Group 2 process vent that complies
by following Sec.  63.113(a)(3) or Sec.  63.113(d) of this subpart that
uses one or more recovery devices shall install either an organic
monitoring device equipped with a continuous recorder or the monitoring
equipment specified in paragraph (b)(1), (b)(2), or (b)(3) of this
section, depending on the type of recovery device used. All monitoring
equipment shall be installed, calibrated, and maintained according to
the manufacturer's specifications or other written procedures that
provide adequate assurance that the equipment would reasonably be
expected to monitor accurately. Monitoring is not required for process
vents with TRE index values greater than 4.0 as specified in Sec.
63.113(e) of this subpart.
* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (2) Complies by following the requirements of Sec.  63.113(a)(3) or
Sec.  63.113(d), and maintains a TRE greater than 1.0 but less than or
equal to 4.0 without a recovery device or with a recovery device other
than the recovery devices listed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this
section; or
* * * * *
    7. Amend Sec.  63.115 by revising paragraph (e)(2) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.115  Process vent provisions--methods and procedures for
process vent group determination.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (2) Where a process vent with the recalculated TRE index value
meets the Group 1 definition, or where the recalculated TRE index
value, flow rate, or concentration meet the specifications of Sec.
63.113(d) of this subpart, the owner or operator shall submit a report
as specified in Sec.  63.118 (g), (h), (i), or (j) of this subpart and
shall comply with the appropriate provisions in Sec.  63.113 of this
subpart by the dates specified in Sec.  63.100 of subpart F of this
part.
* * * * *
    8. Amend Sec.  63.117 by revising paragraph (a) introductory text
and paragraph (a)(7) introductory text to read as follows:

Sec.  63.117  Process vent provisions--reporting and recordkeeping
requirements for group and TRE determinations and performance tests.

    (a) Each owner or operator subject to the provisions for process
vents with a TRE index value less than or equal to 4.0 shall:
* * * * *
    (7) Record and report the following when achieving and maintaining
a TRE index value of 4.0 or less, as specified in Sec.  63.113(a)(3) or
Sec.  63.113(d) of this subpart:
* * * * *

    9. Amend Sec.  63.118 by revising paragraphs (b) introductory text,
paragraph (c) introductory text, and paragraph (h) introductory text to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.118  Process vent provisions--periodic reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.

* * * * *
    (b) Each owner or operator using a recovery device or other means
to achieve and maintain a TRE index value less than or equal to 4.0 as
specified in Sec.  63.113(a)(3) or Sec.  63.113(d) of this subpart
shall keep the following records up-to-date and readily accessible:
* * * * *
    (c) Each owner or operator subject to the provisions of this
subpart and who elects to demonstrate compliance with the TRE index
value greater than 4.0 under Sec.  63.113(e) of this subpart or less
than or equal to 4.0 under Sec.  63.113(a)(3) or Sec.  63.113(d) of
this subpart shall keep up-to-date, readily accessible records of:
* * * * *
    (h) Whenever a process change, as defined in Sec.  63.115(e) of
this subpart, is made that causes a Group 2 process vent with a TRE
greater than 4.0 to become a Group 2 process vent with a TRE less than
or equal to 4.0, the owner or operator shall submit a report within 180
calendar days after the process change. The report may be submitted as
part of the next periodic report. The report shall include:
* * * * *
    10. Amend Sec.  63.119 by revising paragraph (a)(1) and (a)(2) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.119  Storage vessel provisions--reference control technology.

    (a) * * *
    (1) For each Group 1 storage vessel storing a liquid for which the
maximum true vapor pressure of the total organic hazardous air
pollutants in the liquid is less than 76.6 kilopascals, the owner or
operator shall reduce hazardous air pollutants emissions to the
atmosphere either by operating and maintaining a fixed roof and
internal floating roof, an external floating roof, an external floating
roof converted to an internal floating roof, a closed vent system and
control device, routing the emissions to a process or a fuel gas
system, or vapor balancing in accordance with the requirements in
paragraph (b), (c), (d), (e), (f), or (g) of this section, or
equivalent as provided in Sec.  63.121 of this subpart.
    (2) For each Group 1 storage vessel storing a liquid for which the
maximum true vapor pressure of the total organic hazardous air
pollutants in the liquid is greater than or equal to 76.6 kilopascals,
the owner or operator shall operate and maintain a closed vent system
and control device meeting the requirements specified in paragraph (e)
of this section, route the emissions to a process or a fuel gas system
as specified in paragraph (f) of this section, vapor balance as
specified in paragraph (g) of this section, or equivalent as provided
in Sec.  63.121 of this subpart.
* * * * *
    11. Amend Sec.  63.120 by revising paragraph (b)(1)(iv) to read as
follows:

Sec.  63.120  Storage vessel provisions--procedures to determine
compliance.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (iv) If any storage vessel ceases to store organic hazardous air
pollutants for a period of 1 year or more, or if the storage vessel
ceases to meet the definition of a Group 1 storage vessel for a period
of 1 year or more, then measurements of gaps between the vessel wall
and the primary seal, and gaps between the vessel wall and the
secondary seal, shall be performed within 90 calendar days of the
vessel being refilled with organic hazardous air pollutants.
* * * * *
    12. Amend Sec.  63.123 by adding paragraph (b) to read as follows.

Sec.  63.123  Storage vessel provisions--recordkeeping.

* * * * *
    (b) On or after [DATE THREE YEARS AFTER THE DATE THE FINAL RULE IS
PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], an owner or operator must keep
records of the uncontrolled hazardous air pollutant emissions from each
Group 2 storage vessel, containing at least one hazardous air pollutant
listed in table 38 of this subpart, on a 12-month rolling average.
Calculate uncontrolled hazardous air pollutant emissions
(ESiu) using the equations and procedures in Sec.
63.150(g)(3)(i). The provisions of this paragraph apply to new sources
that commence construction or reconstruction after [DATE OF PUBLICATION
OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] upon start-up or by [DATE FINAL
RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], whichever is later.
* * * * *
    13. Amend Sec.  63.150 by revising paragraph (g)(2)(iii)(B)(2) to
read as follows:

Sec.  63.150  Emissions averaging provisions

* * * * *
    (g) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iii) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (2) For determining debits from Group 1 process vents, recovery
devices shall not be considered control devices and cannot be assigned
a percent reduction in calculating EPViACTUAL. The sampling
site for measurement of uncontrolled emissions is after the final
recovery device. However, as provided in Sec.  63.113(a)(3), a Group 1
process vent may add sufficient recovery to raise the TRE index value
to a level such that the vent becomes a Group 2 process vent.
* * * * *
    14. Amend the appendices to subpart G by adding Table 38 to subpart
G of part 63--List of Hazardous Air Pollutants Subject to Additional
Requirements to Protect Public Health and the Environment.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Pollutant                             CAS No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane..................................        79345
1,1,2-Trichloroethane......................................        79005
1,2-Diphenylhydrazine......................................       122667
1,3-Butadiene..............................................       106990
1,3-Dichloropropene........................................       542756
1,4-Dioxane................................................       123911
2,4-Dinitrotoluene.........................................       121142
2,4-Toluene diamine........................................        95807
2,4-Toluene diisocyanate...................................       584849
2-Nitropropane.............................................        79469
3,3'-Dichlorobenzidine.....................................        91941
3,3'-Dimethylbenzidine.....................................       119937
Acetaldehyde...............................................        75070
Acetamide..................................................        60355
Acrolein...................................................       107028
Acrylamide.................................................        79061
Acrylonitrile..............................................       107131
Allyl chloride.............................................       107051
Aniline....................................................        62533
Benzene....................................................        71432
Benzotrichloride...........................................        98077
Benzyl chloride............................................       100447
Bis (chloromethyl) ether...................................       542881
Bromoform..................................................        75252
Carbon tetrachloride.......................................        56235
Chrysene...................................................       218019
Dichloroethyl ether........................................       111444
Epichlorohydrin............................................       106898
Ethyl acrylate.............................................       140885
Ethylene dibromide.........................................       106934
Ethylene dichloride........................................       107062
Ethylene oxide.............................................        75218
Ethylidene dichloride......................................        75343
Formaldehyde...............................................        50000
Hexachlorobenzene..........................................       118741
Hexachlorobutadiene........................................        87683
Hexachloroethane...........................................        67721
Isophorone.................................................        78591
Maleic anhydride...........................................       108316
Methyl bromide.............................................        74839
Methyl tert-butyl ether....................................      1634044
Methylene chloride.........................................        75092
Naphthalene................................................        91203
o-Toluidine................................................        95534
p-Dichlorobenzene..........................................       106467
Propylene dichloride.......................................        78875
Propylene oxide............................................        75569
Tetrachloroethene..........................................       127184
Trichloroethylene..........................................        79016

Vinyl chloride.............................................        75014
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Subpart H--[Amended]

    15. Amend Sec.  63.160 by revising paragraph (g)(1)(i) and
(g)(1)(ii) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.160  Applicability and designation of source.

* * * * *
    (g) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (i) For equipment, 40 CFR part 65 satisfies the requirements of
Sec. Sec.  63.102, 63.103, and 63.162 through 63.182. When choosing to
comply with 40 CFR part 65, the requirements of Sec.  63.180(d)
continue to apply. On or after [DATE ONE YEAR AFTER THE DATE THE FINAL
RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], owners or operators must
comply with the valve monitoring frequencies and valve leak frequencies
in Sec.  63.168(k) instead of Sec.  65.106(b)(3) for processes that
contain at least one hazardous air pollutant listed in table 38 of
subpart F. New sources that commence construction or reconstruction
after [DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] must
comply with the valve monitoring frequencies and valve leak frequencies
in Sec.  63.168(k) instead of Sec.  65.106(b)(3) for processes that
contain at least one hazardous air pollutant listed in table 38 of
subpart F upon start-up or by [DATE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE
FEDERAL REGISTER], whichever is later.
    (ii) For Group 1 and Group 2 process vents, Group 1 and Group 2
storage vessels, and Group 1 transfer operations, comply with Sec.
63.110(i)(1).
* * * * *
    16. Amend Sec.  63.168 by revising paragraph (a) introductory text
and adding paragraph (k) to read as follows:

Sec.  63.168  Standards: Valves in gas/vapor service and in light
liquid service.

    (a) The provisions of this section apply to valves that are either
in gas service or in light liquid service. On or after [DATE ONE YEAR
AFTER THE DATE THE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] the
owner or operator of a process unit containing at least one HAP from
table 38 of subpart G of part 63, must comply with monitoring frequency
and leak frequency requirements in paragraph (k) of this section. New
sources that commence construction or reconstruction after [DATE OF
PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER] must comply with the
provisions of this paragraph upon start-up or by [DATE FINAL RULE IS
PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], whichever is later.
* * * * *
    (k) On or after [DATE ONE YEAR AFTER THE DATE THE FINAL RULE IS
PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], the owner or operator of a source
subject to this subpart shall monitor all valves at process units
containing at least one HAP from table 38 of subpart G of part 63,
except as provided in Sec.  63.162(b) of this subpart and paragraphs
(h) and (i) of this section, at the intervals specified in paragraph
(k)(2) of this section and shall comply with all other provisions of
this section, except as provided in Sec. Sec.  63.171, 63.177, 63.178,
and 63.179 of this subpart. New sources that commence construction or
reconstruction after [DATE OF PUBLICATION OF FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER] must comply with the provisions of this paragraph by upon
start-up or [DATE FINAL RULE IS PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER],
whichever is later.
    (1) The valves shall be monitored to detect leaks by the method
specified in Sec.  63.180(b) of this subpart. The instrument reading
that defines a leak is 500 parts per million.
    (2) The owner or operator shall monitor valves for leaks at the
intervals specified in paragraphs (k)(2)(i) through (k)(2)(v) of this
section. Monitoring data generated before [DATE THE FINAL RULE IS
PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER], may be used to qualify for less
frequent monitoring under paragraphs (k)(2)(ii) through paragraphs
(k)(2)(v) of this section.
    (i) At process units with 0.5 percent or greater leaking valves,
calculated according to paragraph (e) of this section, the owner or
operator shall monitor each valve once per month.
    (ii) At process units with less than 0.5 percent leaking valves,
the owner or operator shall monitor each valve once each quarter,
except as provided in paragraphs (k)(2)(iii) through (k)(2)(v) of this
section.
    (iii) At process units with less than 0.5 percent leaking valves
over two consecutive quarters, the owner or operator may elect to
monitor each valve once every 2 quarters.
    (iv) At process units with less than 0.5 percent leaking valves
over three out of four consecutive quarters, the owner or operator may
elect to monitor each valve once every 4 quarters.
    (v) At process units with less than 0.25 percent leaking valves
over two consecutive periods, the owner or operator may elect to
monitor each valve once every two years.

[FR Doc. 06-5219 Filed 6-13-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 171 (Tuesday, September 4, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53880-53882]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21641]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings 1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC12-137-000.
    Applicants: Constellation Power Source Generation LLC, Brandon
Shores LLC, C.P. Crane LLC, H.A. Wagner LLC.
    Description: Joint Application of Constellation Power Source
Generation LLC, Brandon Shores LLC, H.A. Wagner LLC and C.P. Crane LLC
under Section 203.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5141.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: EC12-138-000.
    Applicants: Minonk Wind, LLC, Algonquin Power Fund (America) Inc.
    Description: Application for Authorization for Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities of Minonk Wind, LLC and Algonquin Power Fund
(America) Inc.
    Filed Date: 8/24/12.
    Accession Number: 20120824-5111.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG12-102-000.
    Applicants: Brandon Shores LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator of Brandon Shores LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5146.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: EG12-103-000.
    Applicants: H.A. Wagner LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator of H.A. Wagner LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5147.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: EG12-104-000.
    Applicants: C.P. Crane LLC.
    Description: Notice of Self-Certification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator of C.P. Crane LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5148.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2985-005; ER10-3049-006; ER10-3051-006.
    Applicants: Champion Energy Marketing LLC, Champion Energy
Services, LLC, Champion Energy, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Champion
Energy Marketing LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5143.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-645-005.
    Applicants: California Ridge Wind Energy LLC.
    Description: Change in Status Notice of California Ridge Wind
Energy LLC.
    Filed Date: 8/24/12.
    Accession Number: 20120824-5052.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1204-002.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Errata to Compliance Filing in ER12-1204 re Order 755
to be effective 10/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5119.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2055-001.
    Applicants: San Gorgonio Farms, Inc.
    Description: Supplement to its Market-Based Rate Application.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5018.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/4/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2505-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: 2460 Tulsa LFG, LLC GIA to be effective 7/20/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/20/12.
    Accession Number: 20120820-5187.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/10/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2506-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: SGIA with TA-Acacia, LLC, TA-Acacia Project to be
effective 8/24/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5034.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2507-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: 2208R1 Ensign Wind, LLC GIA to be effective 7/24/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5062.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2508-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: OATT Revised Section 14 to be effective 10/23/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5063.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2509-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: California Independent System Operator Corporation
submits tariff filing per 35: 2012-08-23 CAISO Filing in Compliance
with July 24, 2012 Order (ER12-1855-000) to be effective 7/25/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5101.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2510-000.
    Applicants: Brandon Shores LLC.
    Description: Brandon Shores Section 205 to be effective 10/8/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5118.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2511-000.
    Applicants: C.P. Crane LLC.
    Description: CP Crane Section 205 to be effective 10/8/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2512-000.
    Applicants: H.A. Wagner LLC.
    Description: HA Wagner Section 205 to be effective 10/8/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5121.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2513-000.
    Applicants: Raven Power Marketing LLC.
    Description: Raven Power Section 205 to be effective 10/8/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/23/12.
    Accession Number: 20120823-5122.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/13/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2514-000.
    Applicants: Susterra Energy, LLC.
    Description: Susterra Energy MBR Application and Initial MBR Tariff
to be effective 10/23/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/24/12.
    Accession Number: 20120824-5023.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2515-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Interconnection Facilities Agreement with The City of
Riverside to be effective 8/25/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/24/12.
    Accession Number: 20120824-5037.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2516-000.
    Applicants: Cleco Power LLC.
    Description: RS 37--ESIA with City of Natchitoches, Louisiana to be
effective 8/24/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/24/12.
    Accession Number: 20120824-5038.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2517-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Amended SGIA & DSA to Site 12 4091(S) E. Francis St
Bldg 5, Ontario, CA Project to be effective 10/24/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/24/12.
    Accession Number: 20120824-5043.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2518-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Queue No. W2-022; Original Service Agreement No. 3386
to be effective 7/25/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/24/12.
    Accession Number: 20120824-5046.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2519-000.
    Applicants: Cleco Power LLC.
    Description: Cleco Power LLC submits a Notice of Cancellation of
Rate Schedule 14--ESIA with City of Natchitoches, Louisiana.
    Filed Date: 8/24/12.
    Accession Number: 20120824-5053.

    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2520-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation
    Description: 2012-08-24 CAISO Filing of Amended Service Agreement
2157 and Request for Waiver to be effective 10/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/24/12.
    Accession Number: 20120824-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2521-000.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: 08--24--12 OATT ITO Amend to be effective 9/1/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/27/12.
    Accession Number: 20120827-5003.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/17/12.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-2522-000.
    Applicants: D & L Harris and Associates.
    Description: Initial to be effective 8/28/2012.
    Filed Date: 8/27/12.
    Accession Number: 20120827-5026.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/17/12.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
reliability filings:

    Docket Numbers: RR12-13-000.
    Applicants: North American Electric Reliability Corporation.
    Description: Request of the North American Electric Reliability
Corporation for Acceptance of its 2013 Business Plan and Budget and the
2013 Business Plans and Budgets of Regional Entities and for Approval
of Proposed Assessments to Fund Budgets.
    Filed Date: 08/24/2012.
    Accession Number: 20120824-5029.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 9/14/12.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: August 27, 2012.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-21641 Filed 8-31-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 240)]
[Notices]
[Page 75707-75709]
[DOCID:fr12de08-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0414; FRL-8751-2]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Submission of Protocols and Study
Reports for Environmental Research Involving Human Subjects; EPA ICR
No. 2195.03, OMB Control No. 2070-0169

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document

announces that an Information Collection Request (ICR) has been
forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection.
The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the nature of the
information collection and its estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before January 12,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPP-
2008-0414, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: OPP Regulatory
Public Docket (7502P), Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention:
Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Joseph Hogue, Field and External
Affairs Division, Office of Pesticide Programs, (7506P), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On June 13, 2008 (73 FR 33811), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received two comments during the
comment period, which are addressed in the ICR. Any additional comments
on this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this
notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0414, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the OPP Regulatory Public
Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Building), 2777 S.
Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at www.regulations.gov as EPA receives
them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted
material, confidential business information (CBI), or other information
whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: Submission of Protocols and Study Reports for Environmental
Research Involving Human Subjects.
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2195.03, OMB Control No. 2070-0169.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on January 31, 2009.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: In January 2006, EPA issued a final rule to amend the
Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (also known as the
Common Rule) at 40 CFR part 26. EPA's final rule significantly
strengthened and expanded the protections for subjects of ``third-
party'' human research (i.e., research that is not conducted or
supported by EPA). Affected entities are required to submit information
to EPA and an institutional review board (IRB) prior to initiating, and
to EPA upon the completion of, certain studies that involve human
research participants. The information collection activity imposed by
this final rule consists of activity-driven reporting and recordkeeping
requirements for those who intend to conduct research for submission to
EPA under the pesticide laws. If such research involves intentional
dosing of human subjects, these individuals (respondents) are required
to submit study protocols to EPA and a cognizant local Human Subjects
IRB before such research is initiated so that the scientific design and
ethical standards that will be employed during the proposed study may
be reviewed and approved. Also, respondents are required to submit
information about the ethical conduct of completed research that
involved human subjects when such research is submitted to EPA.
    This renewal ICR estimates the third party response burden from
complying with the January 2006 final rule. Information is typically
submitted by registrants of pesticide products to support the
registration of their products. Responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. The authority for this information
collection is provided under section 25 of FIFRA and 40 CFR part 26.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 598
hours per response for research involving intentional exposure of human
subjects, and 12 hours per response for all other submitted research
with human subjects. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Pesticide registrants.
    Estimated Number of Responses: 54.
    Frequency of Response: On occasion.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 20,572.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $1,579,098, includes $0 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 19,168 hours in
the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of
Approved ICR Burdens. This increase is an adjustment to the estimate,
based on input received during the consultation process from entities
that have submitted human subjects research since the implementation of
the rule. The burden estimates in the previous (new) ICR were developed
before the rule was

implemented, and were based on EPA's predictions of how long it would
take study sponsors to prepare submissions. Based on the information
provided in the consultation responses, it appears that the actual
amount of time necessary to comply with the paperwork and recordkeeping
requirements is higher than originally estimated.

    Dated: December 8, 2008.
John Moses,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E8-29483 Filed 12-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 213 (Thursday, November 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 76623-76624]
[FR Doc No: 2016-26575]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4283-DR]; [Docket ID FEMA-2016-0001]

Florida; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Florida (FEMA-4283-DR), dated October 8, 2016, and
related determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: October 27, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Florida is hereby amended to include the following
areas among those areas determined to have been adversely affected by
the event declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration
of October 8, 2016.

    Bradford and Lake Counties for Public Assistance, including
direct federal assistance. Seminole County for Public Assistance,
including direct federal assistance (already designated for
Individual Assistance).
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2016-26575 Filed 11-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 56 (Tuesday, March 24, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 15660-15661]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06471]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Delayed Applications

AGENCY: Office of Hazardous Materials Safety, Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), DOT.

ACTION: List of application delayed more than 180 days.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 5117(c),
PHMSA is publishing the following list of special permit applications
that have been in process for 180 days or more. The reason(s) for delay
and the expected completion date for action on each application is
provided in association with each identified application.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Special Permits and Approvals, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, P1411-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>

Key to ``Reason for Delay''

    1. Awaiting additional information from applicant
    2. Extensive public comment under review
    3. Application is technically complex and is of significant impact
or

precedent-setting and requires extensive analysis
    4. Staff review delayed by other priority issues or volume of
special permit applications

Meaning of Application Number Suffixes

    N--New application
    M--Modification request R--Renewal Request
    P--Party To Exemption Request

    Issued in Washington, DC, on March 3, 2015.
Donald Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits.

Modification to Special Permits

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                            Reason for    Estimated date
    Application No.         Applicant          delay       of completion
------------------------------------------------------------------------
15642-M...............  Praxair                        4      04-13-2015
                         Distribution,
                         Inc., Danbury,
                         Inc.
8451-M................  Special Devices,               4      03-31-2015
                         Inc., Mesa, AR.
13961-M...............  3AL Testing                    4      03-31-2015
                         Corp.,
                         Centennial, CO.
14700-M...............  Pentair                        4      03-15-2015
                         Residential
                         Filtration,
                         LLC, Chardon,
                         OH.
15552-M...............  Poly-Coat                      4      03-15-2015
                         Systems, Inc.,
                         Liverpool, TX.
11903-M...............  Comptank                       4      04-10-2015
                         Corporation,
                         Bothwell, ON.
15767-N...............  Union Pacific                  1      03-20-2015
                         Railroad
                         Company, Omaha,
                         NE.
16001-N...............  VELTEK                         4      03-31-2015
                         ASSOCIATES,
                         INC., Malvern,
                         PA.
16061-N...............  Battery                        4      03-31-2015
                         Solutions, LLC,
                         Howell, MI.
16154-N...............  Patriot                        4      03-31-2015
                         Fireworks, LLC,
                         Ann Arbor, MI.
16190-N...............  Digital Wave                   4      03-31-2015
                         Corporation,
                         Centennial, CO.
16198-N...............  Fleischmann's                  4      04-15-2015
                         Vinegar
                         Company, Inc.,
                         CERRITOS, CA.
16181-N...............  Arc Process,                   4      03-13-2015
                         Inc.,
                         Pflugerville,
                         TX.
16212-N...............  Entegris, Inc.,                4      04-30-2015
                         Billerica, MA.
16220-N...............  Americase,                     4      03-31-2015
                         Waxahache, TX.
16193-N...............  CH&I                           4      03-20-2015
                         Technologies,
                         Inc., Santa
                         Paula, CA.
16199-N...............  Rosharon Testing               4      03-20-2015
                         and Subsea
                         Center, A
                         Division of
                         Schlumberger
                         Technology
                         Corporation,
                         Rosharon, TX.
16238-N...............  Entegris, Inc.,                4      03-20-2015
                         Billerica, MA.
16239-N...............  Trinity                        3      04-30-2015
                         Containers,
                         LLC, Dallas, TX.
16241-N...............  Linde Gas North                4      04-15-2015
                         America LLC,
                         Murry Hill, NJ.
16232-N...............  Linde Gas North                1      04-20-2015
                         America LLC,
                         Murry Hill, NJ.
11860-R...............  GATX                           4      03-31-2015
                         Corporation,
                         Chicago, IL.
15765-R...............  Delphi                         4      03-31-2015
                         Automotive
                         Systems, LLC,
                         Kokomo, IN.
5861-R................  Pacific                        4      03-15-2015
                         Scientific
                         Company, Simi
                         Valley, CA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2015-06471 Filed 3-23-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-60-M


ATTENDEES LIST State/ Tribal/ Federal Meeting on Mine Placement of Coal Combustion Waste October 29 and 30, 2002 Attendee Name Affiliation Phone E mail Address Scott Fowler Illinois DNR  DMM 217 558 4333 sfowler@ dnrmail. state. il. us Daniel Wheeler Illinois DCCA  OCD 217 558 2645 dwheeler@ commerce. state. il. us Greg Conrad IMCC 703 709 8654 gconrad@ imcc. isa. us Bruce Stevens Indiana DNR 812 665 2207 bstevens@ osmre. gov Ed Larrimore Maryland DE  Mining Program 410 537 3557 elarrimore@ mde. state. md. us John Carey Maryland DE  Bureau of Mines 301 689 6764 x206 jcarey@ allconet. org Scott Waltrip Missouri DNR 573 751 5401 nrwalts@ mail. dnr. state. mo. us Angela McDannel Montana DEQ 406 444 4991 amcdannel@ state. mt. us Jeffrey Schmitt New York State DEC  Solid Waste 518 402 8706 jcschmit@ gw. dec. state. ny. us Steven M. Potter New York State DEC  Mineral Resources 518 402 8067 smpotter@ gw. dec. state. ny. us Andrew Voros New York/ New Jersey COAST 212 854 2910 coast@ columbia. edu Steve Tillotson North Dakota DOH  Solid Waste Division 701 328 5163 stillots@ state. nd. us William E. Dodd North Dakota PSC  AML Division 701 328 4096 wed@ psc. state. nd. us Bob Baker Ohio DMRM 614 265 1092 bob. baker@ dnr. state. oh. us Maryann Pritchard Oklahoma DOM 405 521 3859 x22 maryann@ osmre. gov Bret R. Sholar Oklahoma DOM  Minerals Division 409 521 3859 x35 bsholar@ osmre. gov Peter Michael OSM  Pittsburgh, PA 412 937 2867 pmichael@ osmre. gov Randall Mills OSM  Washington, D. C. 202 208 2928 rmills@ osmre. gov Kimery Vories OSM  Altom, IL 618 463 6463 x103 kvories@ osmre. gov Michael J. Menghini Pennsylvania DEP  District Mining Ops. 570 621 3118 mmenghini@ state. pa. us Pat Ransom SAIC 703 318 4681 ransomp@ saic. com Craig Kennedy South Carolina DHEC 803 896 4262 kennedrc@ dhec. state. sc. us John Caudle Texas Railroad Commision 512 305 8819 john. caudle@ rrc. state. tx. us Susi Ferguson Texas CEQ  Policy & Regs 512 239 2320 sferguso@ tceq. state. tx. us Richard Kinch U. S. EPA 703 308 8214 kinch. richard@ epa. gov Bonnie Robinson U. S. EPA 703 308 8429 robinson. bonnie@ epa. gov Attendee Name Affiliation Phone E mail Address Andy Wittner U. S. EPA 703 308 0496 wittner. andrew@ epa. gov Truett DeGeare U. S. EPA 703 308 8292 degeare. truett@ epa. gov Benny Wampler Virginia DMME 276 523 8145 brw@ mme. state. va. us Butch Lambert Virginia DMME 276 523 8286 bcl@ mme. state. va. us John Ailes West Virginia DEP 304 759 0510 jailes@ mail. dep. state. wv. us Lewis A. Halstead West Virginia DEP 304 759 0510 lhalstead@ mail. dep. state. wv. us Rick Chancellor Wyoming DEQ 307 777 7046 rchanc@ state. wy. us


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 21, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 2926]
[FR Doc No: 2015-00803]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL00-95-281

San Diego Gas & Electric Company v. Sellers of Energy and
Ancillary Services Into Markets Operated by the California Independent
System Operator Corporation and the California Power Exchange; Notice
of Compliance Filing

    Take notice that on January 12, 2015, Koch Energy Trading, Inc.
submitted a compliance filing pursuant to the Commission's Opinion No.
536.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ San Diego Gas & Elec. Co. v. Sellers of Energy and Ancillary
Services Into Markets Operated by the California Independent System
Operator and the California Power Exchange., 149 FERC ] 61,116
(2014) (Opinion No. 536).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
``eSubscription'' link on the Web site that enables subscribers to
receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed
docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 2, 2015.

    Dated: January 12, 2015.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-00803 Filed 1-20-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P