[Federal Register: February 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 23)]
[Notices]
[Page 5821-5822]
[DOCID:fr04fe10-81]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-61416; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2010-010]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Clarify Nasdaq Rule 7023

January 25, 2010.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on January 21, 2010, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III, below, which Items have been prepared by Nasdaq. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to clarify Nasdaq Rule 7023 to make clear
that Historical ModelView information will be available via
NasdaqTrader.com and that references to the Historical TotalView data
product will be deleted since it is offered through a technology
subsidiary of the Exchange rather than the Exchange itself. The text of
the proposed rule change is available from Nasdaq's Web site at http://
nasdaq.cchwallstreet.com, at Nasdaq's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.
    The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new
language is italicized; proposed deletions are in brackets.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Changes are marked to the rules of The NASDAQ Stock Market
LLC found at http://nasdaqomx.cchwallstreet.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *

7023. NASDAQ TotalView

    (a)-(c) No change.
    (d) Historical ModelView [TotalView] Information [--ModelView]
Nasdaq will make historical [TotalView information, under the]
ModelView [entitlement package] information[,] available via
NasdaqTrader.com. ModelView shall contain historical [TotalView]
information regarding aggregate displayed and reserve liquidity at
each price level directly from [in] the Nasdaq Market Center.
ModelView shall be available for a subscription fee of $2,000 per
month.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, Nasdaq included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. Nasdaq has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to clarify Nasdaq Rule 7023(d) to make clear
that Historical ModelView information will be available via
NasdaqTrader.com and will contain historical information regarding
aggregate displayed and reserve liquidity at each price level directly
from the Nasdaq Market Center. Additionally, references to the
Historical TotalView data product will be deleted from Nasdaq Rule
7023(d) since it is offered through a technology subsidiary of the
Exchange rather than the Exchange itself. Historical

TotalView can be created by any vendor that receives the real time data
feed and, as such, is not exclusively created through the Exchange.
    ModelView is designed to facilitate more efficient trading activity
in the Nasdaq Market Center in an environment where trading and order-
routing become increasingly automated, and broker-dealers,
institutional traders and technology providers are constantly seeking
to improve the quality of information upon which trading and order-
routing decisions are made. The incremental data in ModelView helps
customers give better visibility into data not previously available.
    Specifically, ModelView provides the aggregate amount of both
displayed and reserve size liquidity in the Nasdaq Market Center at
each price level. With this information, developers of automated
trading and order-routing models improve their Nasdaq trading
efficiency, and the providers of liquidity to the Nasdaq Market Center
find greater fill rates and execution quality. ModelView protects the
anonymity of the trading strategies of Nasdaq Market Center
participants while improving the execution quality of their orders.
Also, ModelView does not contain explicit or implicit information
regarding the identity of market participants trading in Nasdaq at the
relevant time.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \4\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \5\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest.
The proposed change is designed to clarify the applicability of
Nasdaq's rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange believes that the foregoing proposed rule change may
take effect upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) \6\ of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder \7\
because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose
any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest. In addition, at least five days
prior to the instant filing, the Exchange provided the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
    The Exchange believes that this proposal qualifies for immediate
effectiveness as a ``non-controversial'' rule change under paragraph
(f)(6) of Rule 19b-4.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-010 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-010. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml).

    Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the
Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2010-010 and
should be submitted on or before February 25, 2010.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-2329 Filed 2-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 90 (Thursday, May 9, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20453-20454]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09509]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85766; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2019-015]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a Proposed Rule
Change To List and Trade Units of Each of (i) Cboe Vest S&P 500[supreg]
Buffer Enhanced Growth Protect Strategy ETNs; (ii) Cboe Vest S&P
500[supreg] Enhanced Growth Strategy ETNs; (iii) Cboe Vest S&P
500[supreg] Accelerated Return Strategy ETNs; and (iv) Cboe Vest S&P
500[supreg] Power Buffer Strategy ETNs Under Rule 14.11(d), Equity
Index-Linked Securities

May 3, 2019.
    On March 4, 2019, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'' or ``BZX'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
list and trade units of each of (i) the Cboe Vest S&P 500[supreg]
Buffer Enhanced Growth Protect Strategy ETNs; (ii) the Cboe Vest S&P
500[supreg] Enhanced Growth Strategy ETNs; (iii) the Cboe Vest S&P
500[supreg] Accelerated Return Strategy ETNs; and (iv) the Cboe Vest
S&P 500[supreg] Power Buffer Strategy ETNs under BZX Rule 14.11(d),
which governs the listing and trading of Equity Index-Linked Securities
on the Exchange. The proposed rule change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on March 22, 2019.\3\ The Commission has received
no comment letters on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85347 (Mar. 18,
2019), 84 FR 10863.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents,

the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is May 6, 2019. The Commission is extending this 45-day time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ designates June
20, 2019 as the date by which the Commission shall either approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-CboeBZX-2019-015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-09509 Filed 5-8-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 51 (Friday, March 15, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 16494]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05951]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. FC13-1-000 et al.]

Notice of Effectiveness of Foreign Utility Company Status

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Docket Nos.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pacific Northern Gas Ltd................................      FC13-1-000
AtlaGas Utilities Inc...................................      FC13-2-000
Heritage Gas Ltd........................................      FC13-3-000
McNair Creek Hydro Limited Partnership..................      FC13-4-000
AtlaGas Pipeline Partnership............................      FC13-5-000
Bear Mountain Wind Limited Partnership..................      FC13-6-000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Take notice that during the month of February 2013, the status of
the above-captioned entities as Foreign Utility Companies became
effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR
366.7(a).

    Dated: March 7, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-05951 Filed 3-14-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62008-62009]
[FR Doc No: 2013-24446]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: PR13-65-000.
    Applicants: Lobo Pipeline Company L.P.
    Description: NGPA Section 311 Periodic Rate Review Certification
for service 284.123(b)(1).
    Filed Date: 9/30/2013.
    Accession Number: 20130930-5270.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/21/13.

    Docket Numbers: PR14-1-000.
    Applicants: ONEOK Field Services Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff filing per 284.123(b)(2): Rate Petition to be
effective 10/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/2013.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5279.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/22/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-5-000.
    Applicants: WBI Energy Transmission, Inc.
    Description: Annual Report of Penalty Revenue Credits.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5056.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-6-000.
    Applicants: Viking Gas Transmission Company.
    Description: Conforming Backhaul Agreement.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5067.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-7-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.

    Description: Annual Report of Flow Through filed 10-1-13.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5071.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-8-000.
    Applicants: Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, LP.
    Description: Fuel Filing on 10-1-13 to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5095.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-9-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: LNG Fuel Tracker Filing 2013 to be effective 11/1/
2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5096.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-10-000.
    Applicants: Trunkline Gas Company, LLC.
    Description: Fuel Filing on 10-1-2013 to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5097.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-11-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Gas Storage Company.
    Description: Fuel Filing on 10-1-13 to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5098.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-12-000.
    Applicants: Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America.
    Description: Penalty Revenue Crediting Report.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5118.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-13-000.
    Applicants: Carolina Gas Transmission Corporation.
    Description: 2013 FRQ & TDA Filing to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5129.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-14-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Volume No. 2--MPP Project to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5149.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-15-000.
    Applicants: Texas Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: 2013 Fuel Tracker Filing to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5193.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-16-000.
    Applicants: Pine Prairie Energy Center, LLC.
    Description: PNPIS Service Cancellation to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5199.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-17-000.
    Applicants: American Midstream (AlaTenn), LLC.
    Description: AlaTenn Non-Conforming Agreements to be effective 10/
1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5237.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-18-000.
    Applicants: Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
    Description: Volume No. 2--Statoil Natural Gas LLC to be effective
11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/1/13.
    Accession Number: 20131001-5255.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-19-000.
    Applicants: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Petition of Columbia Gas Transmission for Limited
Waiver of Contract and Tariff Provisions.
    Filed Date: 10/2/13.
    Accession Number: 20131002-5005.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/9/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP14-20-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Update List of Non-Conforming Service Agreements
(NESL) to be effective 11/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 10/2/13.
    Accession Number: 20131002-5069.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/15/13.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 3, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-24446 Filed 10-10-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 22, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 35)]
[Notices]
[Page 9115-9117]
[DOCID:fr22fe06-86]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0091; FRL-7761-4]

Pesticide Product Registrations; Conditional Approval

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces Agency approval of applications
submitted by AgraQuest, Inc., to conditionally register the pesticide
products Muscodor albus strain QST 20799, (manufacturing use product)
and its end-use products, Arabesque, Andante, and Glissade containing
the new active ingredient not included in any previously registered
products pursuant to the provisions of section 3(c)(7)(C) of the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA), as
amended.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shanaz Bacchus, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511C), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
Potentially

affected entities may include, but are not limited to:
     Crop production (NAICS code 111).
     Animal production (NAICS code 112).
     Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
     Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
    This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides
a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this
action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be
affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS)
codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to certain entities. To determine
whether you or your business may be affected by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability provisions. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular
entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

    1. Docket. EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket identification number (ID) EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0091. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Public Information

and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall 2,
1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30
a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The
Docket telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    In accordance with section 3(c)(2) of FIFRA, a copy of the approved
label, the list of data references, the data and other scientific
information used to support registration, except for material
specifically protected by section 10 of FIFRA, are available for public
inspection in the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch,
Information Technology and Resources Management Division (7502C),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, Rm. 119,
Crystal Mall 2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA (703) 305-
5805. Requests for data must be made in accordance with the provisions
of the Freedom of Information Act and must be addressed to the Freedom
of Information Office (A-101), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460-0001. Such requests should: Identify the product name and
registration number and specify the data or information desired.
    A paper copy of the fact sheet, which provides more detail on this
registration, may be obtained from the National Technical Information
Service (NTIS), 5285 Port Royal Rd., Springfield, VA 22161.
    2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/.

    Agency Website: EDOCKET, EPA's electronic public docket and comment
system was replaced on November 25, 2005, by an enchanced Federal-wide
electronic docket management and comment system located at http://www.regulations.gov/.
 Follow the on-line instructions.

II. Did EPA Conditionally Approve the Application?

    A conditional registration may be granted under section 3(c)(7)(C)
of FIFRA for a new active ingredient where certain data are lacking, on
condition that such data are received by the end of the conditional
registration period and do not meet or exceed the risk criteria set
forth in 40 CFR 154.7; that use of the pesticide during the conditional
registration period will not cause unreasonable adverse effects; and
that use of the pesticide is in the public interest. The Agency has
considered the available data on the risks associated with the proposed
use of Muscodor albus QST 20799, and information on social, economic,
and environmental benefits to be derived from such use. Specifically,
the Agency has considered the nature and its pattern of use,
application methods and rates, and level and extent of potential
exposure. Based on these reviews, the Agency was able to make basic
health and safety determinations which show that use of Muscodor albus
QST 20799 during the period of conditional registration will not cause
any unreasonable adverse effect on the environment, and that use of the
pesticide is, in the public interest.
    Consistent with section 3(c)(7)(C) of FIFRA, the Agency has
determined that these conditional registrations are in the public
interest. Use of the pesticides are of significance to the user
community, and appropriate labeling, use directions, and other measures
have been taken to ensure that use of the pesticides will not result in
unreasonable adverse effects to man and the environment.

III. Conditionally Approved Registrations

    EPA issued a notice, published in the Federal Register of April 14,
2004 (69 FR 19845) (FRL-7352-7), which announced that AgraQuest, Inc.,
1530 Drew Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, had submitted an application to
conditionally register the pesticide product, Muscodor albus strain QST
20799, biofumigant (EPA File Symbol 69592-RU), containing Muscodor
albus QST 20799, a microbial fungal active ingredient at 2.1%, an
active ingredient not included in any previously registered product.
    This application also included registration of three end-use
products (EPs), each containing 0.35% of Muscodor albus QST 20799. The
EPs are: Arabesque (EPA File Symbol 69592-RL); Andante (EPA File Symbol
69592-RT; and Glissade (EPA File Symbol 69592-RI).
    The applications were conditionally approved on September 22, 2005
for three end-use products each containing 0.35% of Muscodor albus QST
20799 and a manufacturing use product containing this microbial active
ingredient at 2.1%.
    The conditionally approved products are:
    1. Muscodor albus strain QST 20799: For manufacturing use; for
formulating into end-use products. (EPA Registration Number 69592-14).
    2. Arabesque: For the control of post harvest diseases of food and
non-food commodities, and preplant control of seed, bulb, and tuber
borne diseases of food and non-food commodities (EPA Registration
Number 69592-15).
    3. Andante: For use as a methyl bromide replacement to control soil
fungi and nematodes (EPA Registration Number 69592-17).
    4. Glissade: For control of soil diseases for food and non-food
commodities (EPA Registration Number 69592-18).
    As a condition of registration, the registrant is required to
provide a rodent study to confirm that the volatiles produced on
rehydration of the pesticide do not pose an inhalation hazard. These
volatiles occur naturally as flavors and fragrances in foods and
beverages. Neither the parent microbe nor the volatile will have
adverse effects on humans and the environment via dietary, cumulative
and aggregate exposure as based on the evaluation of toxicological
studies submitted by the registrant.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Chemicals, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: February 7, 2006.
Janet L. Andersen,
Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division, Office of
Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. 06-1566 Filed 2-21-06; 8:45 am
BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 18 (Friday, January 27, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5283-5289]
[FR Doc No: 2023-01022]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1678; Airspace Docket No. 22-AWA-4]

Amendment of the Nashville International Airport Class C
Airspace; Nashville, TN; and the John C. Tune Airport Class D Airspace;
Nashville, TN

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to reconfigure the Nashville
International Airport (BNA) Class C airspace area, and amend the
ceiling of the John C. Tune Airport (JWN) Class D airspace area. The
FAA is proposing this action to reduce the risk of midair collisions,
and enhance the efficient management of air traffic operations in the
Nashville, TN, terminal area.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before March 28, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone:
(800) 647-5527, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-1678; Airspace Docket No. 22-AWA-4, at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at
www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the Rules and
Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify the airspace structure as necessary to
preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic within the National
Airspace System (NAS).

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,

environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2022-1678; Airspace Docket No. 22-AWA-4) and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2022-1678; Airspace Docket No. 22-AWA-4.'' The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified comment
closing date will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. All comments submitted will be available for
examination in the public docket both before and after the comment
closing date. A report summarizing each substantive public contact with
FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRM

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5.00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, Room 210, 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park,
GA, 30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective
September 15, 2022. FAA Order JO 7400.11G is publicly available as
listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F
lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service
routes, and reporting points.

Background

    In 1986, the FAA issued a final rule that established the
Nashville, TN, Airport Radar Service Area (ARSA) (51 FR 8284 (March 10,
1986). The establishment of the Nashville ARSA was effective on April
10, 1986. As a result of the Airspace Reclassification final rule (56
FR 65638; December 17, 1991), which became effective in September 1993,
the term ``Airport Radar Service Area'' was replaced by ``Class C
airspace area.'' As with the former ARSA, the primary purpose of a
Class C airspace area is to reduce the potential for midair collisions
in terminal areas and promote the efficient control of air traffic in
those areas. Pilots are required to establish two-way radio
communications with air traffic control (ATC) before entering Class C
airspace, and they must maintain two-way radio communications with ATC
while operating in that airspace. These requirements are designed to
keep ATC informed of all aircraft operating within the Class C airspace
area.
    The BNA Class C airspace was last modified on June 27, 2013 (78 FR
27029; May 9, 2013) in order to remove a small cutout from the Class C
surface area. The purpose of the cutout was to exclude the airspace
within a 1.5 nautical mile (NM) radius of the former Cornelia Fork
Airpark airport (located 4 NM north northwest of BNA) from the BNA
Class C airspace area so that pilots could operate to and from the
Airpark without the requirement to contact ATC. However, the Airpark
has since been permanently closed rendering the cutout unnecessary.
Otherwise, the BNA Class C is unchanged from its original
configuration.
    Operations at BNA are rebounding from the drop in traffic that
resulted during the COVID-19 pandemic. In calendar year (CY) 2015, BNA
hosted 174,178 instrument operations and 184,421 total operations. In
CY 2019, BNA instrument operations were 221,532 out of 234,964 total
operations. CY 2020 saw a drop to 151,342 instrument operations out of
163,365 total operations, while CY 2021 increased to 205,958 instrument
operations and 219,427 total operations. From January 1 through
November 20, 2022, 219,675 instrument operations and 231,575 total
operations were reported. Similarly, BNA passenger enplanements grew
significantly from 4,013,995 in CY 2020, to 7,594,049 in CY 2021 (the
latest year for which validated figures are available). This represents
an increase of more than 89% in enplanements over the previous year.
Furthermore, air traffic in the Nashville terminal area has increased
substantially in all categories of aircraft, including medical
helicopter traffic.
    Three busy satellite airports, near BNA: John C. Tune Airport
(JWN), Smyrna Airport (MQY), and Murfreesboro Municipal Airport (MBT),
generate traffic that routinely crosses the BNA final approach courses.
Significant numbers of visual flight rules (VFR) aircraft, which are
not in contact with ATC, routinely operate in the same airspace outside
of the BNA Class C area that is also used by aircraft operating to and
from BNA. Under this proposal, those VFR aircraft would be required to
establish radio contact with ATC thereby enhancing safety and
efficiency in the BNA terminal area.
    Between July 2019 and February 2020, BNA Terminal Radar Approach
Control (TRACON) logged over 300 instances where unidentified VFR
aircraft operating just outside of the existing Class C airspace
boundaries resulted in Traffic Alert and Collison Avoidance System
(TCAS) alerts and/or air traffic controller actions to prevent
potential conflicts between aircraft.
    Common instances include:
     Unidentified, non-participating VFR aircraft that are not
in contact with ATC skirting the Class C airspace boundary that create
potential traffic conflicts with aircraft arriving or departing BNA;
     Increased workload for air traffic controllers due to the
need for additional vectoring or altitude changes of BNA arrivals and
departures to ensure separation from VFR aircraft that are operating
just outside the Class C airspace, but not in radio communication with
ATC;
     Non-participating aircraft crossing the final approach
course to BNA, and;
     Unidentified aircraft violating the Class C airspace area.

    Note:  A non-participating aircraft is one that is not in radio
communications with ATC, and is not receiving Class C ATC services.

    The FAA proposes to address these issues by modifying the BNA Class
C airspace area as follows:
     Partially extending lateral limits of Class C surface area
(the inner ring) from a 5 NM radius to a 7 NM of BNA;
     Expanding the lateral limits of the Class C airspace by
increasing the radius of the outer ring from 10 NM to 15 NM from BNA,
and;
     Extending the upper altitude limit of the Class C airspace
from 4,600 feet

mean sea level (MSL) to 6,000 feet MSL, and lowering the floor of Class
C airspace to 1,800 feet MSL in certain segments to the north and south
of BNA.

Benefits of Modifying the BNA Class C Airspace Area

    The proposed modifications of the current BNA Class C airspace area
would enhance safety, efficiency, and airspace utilization by requiring
pilots to establish and maintain radio communications with ATC prior
to, and while operating in, the airspace. This would lessen the
likelihood of BNA arrivals and departures encountering unknown aircraft
that are not in contact with ATC. Other benefits would include:
     Enhanced safety by providing ATC the ability to segregate
General Aviation aircraft from higher performance turbojet aircraft and
from BNA arrival and departure traffic;
     Improved traffic patterns that allow for stabilized
approaches to BNA;
     Reduced potential for IFR traffic encountering
unidentified VFR aircraft, and;
     Reduced controller workload associated with vectoring or
climbing/descending IFR aircraft to avoid unverified targets.
    The unique combination of high volumes of general aviation and
commercial operations, and transiting VFR aircraft that take place in
the congested BNA terminal area support a proposal to expand the BNA
Class C airspace area to enhance safety and efficiency.
    The FAA believes that users would benefit from participation in the
proposed expanded availability of Class C services around BNA which
include: sequencing of all aircraft to the primary airport (BNA);
standard IFR services to IFR aircraft; separation, traffic advisories,
and safety alerts between IFR and VFR aircraft; and, mandatory traffic
advisories and safety alerts between VFR aircraft.

Pre-NPRM Public Input

    In May 2021, the FAA initiated action to form an Ad Hoc Committee
(Committee) to seek input and recommendations from representatives of
effected aviation users for the FAA to consider in designing proposed
modifications to the BNA Class C airspace area. The purpose of an Ad
Hoc Committee is to obtain preliminary input from affected users before
a formal proposed airspace design is developed by the FAA for
publication in a Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
    The Committee met on August 25, 2021, at Murfreesboro Municipal
Airport, TN. The Committee was chaired by a representative of the
Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority. Membership included
representatives of local airports, state and local government offices,
and aviation users. Attendance was both in person and virtually via the
internet.
    The Committee report stated that the proposed airspace modification
appears to address the concerns raised by air traffic without being
overly restrictive. Further, the Committee supported the overall goal
of the proposed airspace modification to improve communication and
coordination.

Ad Hoc Committee Recommendations

    The Ad Hoc Committee submitted five recommendations for the FAA to
consider.
    First, the Committee recommended that the FAA extend the helicopter
VFR corridors to the edge of the proposed new Class C airspace
boundary, and review the corridor altitudes.
    The FAA's review of the helicopter VFR corridors indicated no need
for amendments with the Class C modification. The current transition
points and tracks address the safety concerns where helicopters overfly
the final approach courses at BNA and the way aircraft fly the approach
will not change with the proposed Class C modification. The existing
points were designed to transition VFR helicopters safely through the
final approach course. They were not designed as reporting points for
entering or exiting Class C airspace.
    Second, the FAA should review all existing airspace Letters of
Agreement (LOA) for impacts/changes as a result of the proposed Class C
airspace modification.
    The FAA plans to review all LOAs and Standard Operating Procedures
(SOP) for potential impacts and needed changes with respect to the
proposed Class C airspace modification.
    Third, coordinate with local remote controlled (RC) aircraft
club(s) that may fall within the proposed new inner ring to establish
LOAs for safe operations of RC aircraft/unmanned aircraft systems
(UAS).
    The FAA reviewed known local RC clubs and determined that only the
Music City Aviators (MCA) club will fall within the new inner ring
boundary. The MCA LOA has been reviewed and no changes are needed due
to the Class C modification.
    Fourth, inform JWN and MQY stakeholders of the requirement for Mode
C/ADS-B equipage for arrivals/departures through the proposed new Class
C airspace (2,400 feet for JWN and 2,400 feet for MQY).
    If the proposed Class C modification is approved, BNA and the
Metropolitan Nashville Airport Authority will communicate the changes
with the local flying community via airport meetings, public outreach,
and Letters to Airmen.
    Fifth, coordinate with MQY on the impact of the proposed inner ring
extension overlapping MQY Class D airspace when operating on a MQY
Runway 14 approach. Consider providing a notch or cutout in the BNA
Class C to accommodate MQY Runway 14 approaches.
    The FAA determined that creating a notch or cutout in the BNA Class
C airspace to accommodate Runway 14 approaches would create a hazard
for aircraft arriving and departing BNA. Currently, MQY Runway
approaches are rarely approved due to conflicts/impact at BNA.
Unfortunately, FAA is unable to accommodate this recommendation.

Informal Airspace Meeting

    Informal Airspace Meetings provide the FAA another avenue to gather
additional information to assist in the development of an airspace
proposal before issuance of a NPRM.
    As announced in the Federal Register (86 FR 70991; December 14,
2021), an Informal Airspace Meeting concerning proposed modifications
of the BNA Class C airspace area was held on February 22, 2022. The
meeting was conducted virtually as a webinar via the Zoom application.
There were 122 registered attendees; however, many more watched the
meeting on the FAA's social media sites. Seven comments were received
from the attendees.

Discussion of Informal Airspace Meeting Comments

    Two commenters addressed the proposed floor of Class C airspace on
the east and west sides of BNA. The first commenter, who flies from TK
Farm Airport (TN26), requested that the Class C floor on the east side
be raised from 2,100 feet MSL to 2,400 feet MSL. The second commenter,
who trained at Smyrna Airport (MQY) asked that the Class C floor on the
east and west sides be raised to 3,500 feet MSL.
    The FAA considered these suggestions. Discussions between BNA and
MQY resulted in amending the proposed floor on the east side of the
Class C (between 7 and 15 NM from BNA) from 2,100 feet MSL to 2,400
feet MSL. This raises the Class C floor over TN26 to 2,400 feet MSL as
requested. This will allow aircraft to remain under the Class C
airspace in order to reduce the need for multiple radio frequency

changes in that area. Aircraft will have the option to maintain
communication with MQY control tower only. However, the FAA is unable
to raise the floor on the east and west outer rings to 3,500 feet MSL
due to conflicts with the BNA departure release area; John C. Tune
(JWN) departures and arrivals; BNA downwind traffic; and MQY departures
and arrivals.
    One commenter stated concerns that radio communications systems are
deficient in the area adjacent to, and east of, the Nashville Class C
airspace. The commenter stated that this issue could be resolved with
the installation of a Remote Communications Air/Ground facility (RCAG)
at or near the Upper Cumberland Regional Airport (SRB) in Sparta, TN.
    While the FAA is proposing to expand the BNA Class C airspace from
the current 10 NM ring to a 15 NM ring, the FAA will not be expanding
Nashville Approach Control's delegated airspace boundary beyond its
current eastern limit. SRB airport is an additional 18 NM east of the
Nashville Approach Control's airspace boundary line. Radio
communications at SRB is outside of Nashville Approach airspace and
therefore is not included in the Class C changes. Since Memphis ARTCC
is the overlying control facility for SRB, frequency requests should be
made with Memphis ARTCC. The FAA does not believe that expanding the
BNA Class C airspace to the 15 NM ring will have any impact on the
volume of traffic near SRB.
    A pilot who regularly flies between JWN and MQY wrote that, most of
the time they communicate with BNA, but if the controllers are busy,
they will fly under the Class C shelf. The pilot was concerned that
1,800 feet MSL is very low and could cause poor decision making by some
pilots. The commenter suggested the FAA provide an East-West VFR
corridor that goes over the top of BNA for this purpose.
    The FAA acknowledges that the Class C changes may impact the
routing of VFR aircraft into and around Nashville. Until the FAA fully
understands how VFR traffic will flow around the proposed modified
airspace, the FAA will defer consideration of adding VFR corridors. The
FAA encourages pilots to contact ATC for services to overfly BNA, and
for services between JWN and MQY.
    A commenter asked if the changes around Nashville would result in
flight paths that are more concentrated, at lower altitudes, and with
less separation between planes. The commenter also asked about the
impact of noise.
    The BNA Class C modification will not affect departure or arrival
routes, nor result in lower altitudes or concentrated flight paths. It
will provide for increased separation between participating aircraft
during critical phases of flight allowing ATC to provide traffic
advisories in a larger area around BNA. The noise at BNA is subject to
aircraft arriving and departing over which the Class C change has no
direct correlation.
    A pilot asked if the Class C modification will make it easier for
VFR flights to get radar traffic advisories.
    ATC will continue to provide VFR flight following services as duty
priorities allow, an increased area of Class C airspace may result in
increased need for ATC services.
    An airline pilot asked if the Class C change would have any flying
operational impact on his carrier.
    There will be no changes to procedures for air carrier aircraft.
However, safety will be increased between IFR commercial arrivals and
departures and VFR aircraft transiting in and around the proposed Class
C airspace.
    A pilot based at JWN wrote in support of any improvements to better
manage and separate traffic around JWN. The pilot cited cases where it
was difficult to make contact with ATC due to frequency congestion and,
what the commenter sensed to be later than desired handoffs from
approach control to JWN Tower. The commenter asked if the Class C
modification would lead to more air traffic controllers being assigned.
    The LOA between the BNA Airport Traffic Control Tower and the JWN
Federal Contract Tower (FCT) was revised in February 2022 to address
the transfer of communications of JWN arrivals to JWN FCT. A second
revision of the LOA addresses the matching of runways in use between
BNA and JWN, and streamlining the coordination of inbound aircraft with
JWN. The Class C change would extend the airspace to the west of the
JWN Class D airspace, but the outer lower shelf altitude would remain
unchanged at 2,400 feet MSL. This would increase the separation of
aircraft and the ability for ATC to provide traffic advisories and
other services. The Class C proposal would not lead to an increased
number of controllers.
    One commenter stated three concerns about the Class C proposal.
First, the commenter cited concern about the Class C segments located
southeast and northeast of JWN that have a floor set at 1,800 feet MSL
because there are towers that extend up to 2,049 feet MSL near the
boundaries of those Class C segments. The commenter said that this
could pose a problem for VFR pilots flying below 1,800 feet MSL under
either lower Class C segment, and approaching near a 2,049 feet MSL
tower. The commenter said that the floor of the Class C should be
raised to a consistent 2,400 feet MSL. Second, the commenter contended
that coordination between BNA approach control and JWN tower needs
improvement. The commenter wrote that installing a radar display in JWN
tower would enhance traffic management and coordination. Third, the
commenter asked for confirmation that the expansion of the Class C
airspace would result in a previously proposed skydiving operation at
JWN being denied.
    Regarding the comment about the 1,800-foot Class C segments, the
lower floors of the Class C to the north and south of BNA are to ensure
that IFR aircraft in critical stages of flight do not conflict with
nonparticipating VFR aircraft skirting around the inner Class C ring.
This design is necessary for safe air traffic operations into and out
of BNA. Raising the floor of these segments to 2,400 feet MSL would
negate the protection for BNA arriving aircraft. The towers noted by
the commenter are depicted on the Sectional Aeronautical Charts that
cover the Nashville area and are lighted in accordance with 14 CFR part
77. The FAA is not aware of pilots having issues with the towers.
Ultimately, it is the pilot's responsibility to evaluate all factors
that could affect a planned flight, such as minimum safe altitudes, and
determine the safest course of action. Pilots are encouraged to contact
ATC to take advantage of Class C services.
    Regarding the comment about coordination between BNA and JWN, as
discussed under a previous comment, above, the LOA between BNA and JWN
has been revised recently to address transfer of communications and
coordination issues. Installation of a radar display at JWN is not
planned as part of the Class C airspace proposal.
    Lastly, while skydiving operations at JWN are outside the scope of
this rulemaking action, the FAA is addressing the matter in a separate
forum.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to modify the
BNA Class C airspace area and to amend the ceiling of the JWN Class D
airspace area.
    The current BNA Class C airspace area consists of that airspace
extending upward from the surface to and including 4,600 feet MSL
within a 5 NM

radius of BNA; and that airspace extending upward from 2,100 feet MSL
to and including 4,600 feet MSL within a 10 NM radius of BNA from the
019[deg] bearing from BNA clockwise to the 198[deg] bearing from BNA;
and that airspace extending upward from 2,400 feet MSL to and including
4,600 feet MSL within a 10 NM radius of BNA from the 198[deg] bearing
from BNA clockwise to the 018[deg] bearing from BNA.
    This proposal would make minor edits in the text header of the BNA
Class C airspace description, as published in FAA Order JO 7400.11, by
updating BNA airport reference point (ARP) coordinates from ``lat.
36[deg]07'28'' N, long. 86[deg]40'42'' W'' to ``lat. 36[deg]07'28'' N,
long. 86[deg]40'41'' W'' which reflects the latest information in the
Airport Master Records file. In addition, the Smyrna Airport, TN, would
be added to the text header because that airport is referenced in the
Class C description. The proposed Class C modifications are described
below.
    The FAA is proposing to expand the BNA Class C surface area to
extend from the surface up to and including 6,000 feet MSL.
Additionally, the surface area radius would be extended from the
current 5 NM from BNA to 7 NM from BNA from the 335[deg] bearing from
the airport clockwise to the 230[deg] bearing from the airport. The
surface area radius would remain at 5 NM from BNA from the 230[deg]
bearing clockwise to the 335[deg] bearing from the airport. The Class C
surface area would exclude that portion within the Smyrna Airport Class
D airspace area.
    Additionally, the Class C would include that airspace extending
upward from 1,800 feet MSL to and including 6,000 feet MSL within a 15
mile radius of BNA from the 335[deg] bearing from BNA clockwise to the
060[deg] bearing from BNA.
    Additionally, the Class C would include that airspace extending
upward from 2,400 feet MSL to and including 6,000 feet MSL within a 15
NM radius of BNA from the 060[deg] bearing from BNA clockwise to the
155[deg] bearing from BNA, excluding that portion within the Smyrna
Airport Class D airspace area.
    Additionally, the Class C would include that airspace extending
upward from 1,800 feet MSL to and including 6,000 feet MSL within a 15
NM radius of BNA from the 155[deg] bearing from BNA clockwise to the
230[deg] bearing from BNA.
    Additionally, the Class C would include that airspace extending
upward from 2,400 feet MSL within a 15 NM radius of BNA from the
230[deg] bearing from BNA clockwise to the 335[deg] bearing from BNA.

John C. Tune Airport (JWN) Class D Airspace Area

    The FAA is proposing to amend the ceiling of the JWN Class D
airspace area by lowering the ceiling from 2,500 feet MSL ``to but not
including 2,400 feet MSL.'' The proposed westward expansion of the BNA
Class C airspace, with a floor of 2,400 feet MSL, would overlie the JWN
Class D airspace. Lowering the Class D ceiling as proposed would create
a clear delineation between the Class C and Class D airspace areas.
    In developing the above proposed modifications, the FAA has
considered the public input received from the Ad Hoc Committee, and the
informal airspace meetings.
    Class C airspace areas are published in paragraph 4000, and Class D
airspace areas are published in paragraph 5000, respectively, of FAA
Order JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15,
2022, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class C
airspace, and Class D airspace modifications proposed in this document
would be published subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3507(d)) requires
that the FAA consider the impact of paperwork and other information
collection burdens imposed on the public. The FAA has determined that
there is no new information collection requirement associated with this
proposed rule.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    Regulatory Notices and Analyses Changes to Federal regulations must
undergo several economic analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 and
Executive Order 13563 direct that each Federal agency shall propose or
adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination that the benefits
of the intended regulation justify its costs. Second, the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) requires agencies to analyze
the economic impact of regulatory changes on small entities. Third, the
Trade Agreements Act (Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits agencies from setting
standards that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of
the United States. In developing U.S. standards, this Trade Act
requires agencies to consider international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis of U.S. standards. Fourth, the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) requires agencies
to prepare a written assessment of the costs, benefits, and other
effects of proposed or final rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with base year of
1995). The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $165
million, using the most current (2021) Implicit Price Deflator for the
Gross Domestic Product.
    In conducting these analyses, the FAA has determined that this
proposed rule: (1) is expected to have a minimal cost impact, (2) is
not an economically ``significant regulatory action'' as defined in
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, (3) is not significant under the
Department of Transportation's administrative procedure rule on
rulemaking at 49 CFR 5.13; (4) not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities; (5) does not create
unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United States; and
(6) does not impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or tribal
governments, or on the private sector by exceeding the threshold
identified above. These analyses are summarized below.
    As discussed above, the FAA determined that changes put forth in
this proposed rule would reduce the risk of midair collisions, and
enhance air traffic control efficiency, and airspace utilization. The
proposed rule would reconfigure BNA Class C airspace area and amend the
ceiling of JWN Class D airspace area. The FAA considered
recommendations from an Ad Hoc Committee and informal airspace meetings
from the stakeholders. The Committee report stated that the proposed
airspace modification appears to address the concerns raised by air
traffic without being overly restrictive. Further, the Committee
supported the overall goal of the proposed airspace modification to
improve communication and coordination.
    In addition, air traffic in the Nashville terminal area has
increased dramatically in all categories of aircraft. The goals of the
proposal are to reduce the risk of midair collisions and improve the
efficient management of air traffic operations in the Nasville, TN,
terminal area.
    The proposal to modify the BNA Class C airspace area would require
VFR aircraft to establish radio contact with ATC thereby enhancing
safety and efficiency in the BNA terminal area. VFR operators would
only need to make minor adjustments to accommodate the expanded
availability of Class C services around BNA. Therefore, the FAA expects
the proposal would result in

minimal cost to VFR operators. The FAA requests comments on the
benefits and costs of this proposal to inform the final rule.

Regulatory Flexibility Determination

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required
to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain
the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals are given
serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
    Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines it will, it must prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA. However, if an
agency determines that a rule is not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, section
605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the agency may so certify
and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. The
certification must include a statement providing the factual basis for
this determination, and the reasoning should be clear.
    The proposed rule would reconfigure BNA Class C airspace area and
amend the ceiling JWN Class D airspace area. The FAA is proposing this
action to reduce the risk of midair collisions, and enhance the
efficient management of air traffic operations in the Nashville, TN,
terminal area. The FAA determined that changes put forth in this would
increase airspace safety and efficiency.
    The change would affect general aviation operators using BNA Class
C airspace area and amend the ceiling JWN Class D airspace area.
Operators flying VFR would need to adjust their flight paths to avoid
the modified Class C airspace and Class D airspace, if the pilots
desire to operate without contacting ATC. However, the proposed
modifications are intended to address the concerns raised by air
traffic without being burdensome. Therefore, as provided in section
605(b), the head of the FAA certifies that this rulemaking would not
result in a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.

International Trade Impact Assessment

    The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39), as amended by the
Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465), prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing standards or engaging in related activities
that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of the United
States. Pursuant to these Acts, the establishment of standards is not
considered an unnecessary obstacle to the foreign commerce of the
United States, so long as the standard has a legitimate domestic
objective, such as the protection of safety, and does not operate in a
manner that excludes imports that meet this objective. The statute also
requires consideration of international standards and, where
appropriate, that they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has
assessed the potential effect of this proposed rule and determined that
it would improve safety and is consistent with the Trade Agreements
Act.

Unfunded Mandates Assessment

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(in 1995 dollars) in any one year by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector; such a mandate
is deemed to be a ``significant regulatory action.'' The FAA currently
uses an inflation-adjusted value of $165 million in $100 million. This
proposed rule does not contain such a mandate; therefore, the
requirements of Title II of the Act do not apply. the safe, orderly,
and expeditious flow of civil air traffic.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of the Federal
Aviation Administration Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15,
2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 4000 Subpart C--Class C Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO TN C Nashville, TN [Amended]

Nashville International Airport, TN
    (Lat. 36[deg]07'28'' N, long. 86[deg]40'41'' W)

Smyrna Airport, TN
    (Lat. 36[deg]00'32'' N, long. 86[deg]31'12'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to 6,000 feet
MSL within a 5-mile radius of Nashville International Airport from
the 230[deg] bearing from the airport clockwise to the 335[deg]
bearing from the airport; and that airspace extending upward from
the surface to 6,000 feet MSL within a 7-mile radius of Nashville
International Airport from the 335[deg] bearing from the airport
clockwise to the 230[deg] bearing from the airport, excluding that
portion within the Smyrna Airport, TN, Class D airspace area; and
that airspace extending upward from 1,800 feet MSL to 6,000 feet MSL
within a 15-mile radius of Nashville International Airport from the
335[deg] bearing from the airport clockwise to the 060[deg] bearing
from the airport; and that airspace extending upward from 2,400 feet
MSL to 6,000 feet MSL within a 15-mile radius of the airport from
the 060[deg] bearing from the airport clockwise to the 155[deg]
bearing from the airport, excluding that portion within the Smyrna
Airport, TN, Class D airspace area; and that airspace extending
upward from 1,800 feet MSL to 6,000 feet MSL within a 15-mile radius
of Nashville International Airport from the 155[deg] bearing from
the airport clockwise to the 230[deg] bearing from the airport; and
that airspace extending upward from 2,400 feet MSL to 6,000 feet MSL
within a 15-mile radius of Nashville International Airport from the
230[deg] bearing from the airport clockwise to the 335[deg] bearing
from the airport.
* * * * *

Paragraph 5000 Subpart D--Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ASO TN D Nashville, TN [Amended]

John C. Tune Airport, TN
    (Lat. 36[deg]10'59'' N, long. 86[deg]53'11'' W)

    That airspace upward from the surface to but not including 2,400
feet MSL within a

4.1-mile radius of John C. Tune Airport, and within 1.2-miles each
side of the 195[deg] bearing from the airport, extending from the
4.1-mile radius to 6.1-miles south of the airport, and within 1.2-
miles each side of the 015[deg] bearing from the airport, extending
from the 4.1-mile radius to 6.1-miles north of the airport. This
Class D airspace area is effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by a Notice to Air Missions. The
effective dates and times will thereafter be continuously published
in the Chart Supplement.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 17, 2023.
Brian Konie,
Acting Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2023-01022 Filed 1-26-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: November 18, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 221)]
[Notices]
[Page 59581-59582]
[DOCID:fr18no09-88]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[USCG-2009-0992]

National Offshore Safety Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of open teleconference meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a teleconference meeting of the National
Offshore Safety Advisory Committee (NOSAC) to discuss items listed in
the agenda as well as other items that NOSAC may consider. This meeting
will be open to the public.

DATES: The teleconference call will take place on Thursday, December 8,
2009, from 2 p.m. to 4 p.m. EST. This meeting may close early if all
business is finished. Written material and requests to make oral
presentations should reach the Coast Guard on or before December 4,
2009. Requests to have a copy of your material distributed to each
member of the committee should reach the Coast Guard on or before
December 4, 2009.

ADDRESSES: The Committee will meet, via telephone conference, on
December 8, 2009. Members of the public wishing to participate may
contact CDR P.W. Clark at<PHONE_NUMBER> for call in information or they
may participate in person by coming to Room 1303, U.S. Coast Guard
Headquarters Building, 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington DC 20593. As
there are a limited number of teleconference lines, public
participation will be on a first come basis. Written comments should be
sent to Commander P.W. Clark, Designated Federal Officer of NOSAC,
Commandant (CG-5222), 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington, DC 20593-
0001; or by fax to<PHONE_NUMBER>. This notice is available on our online
docket, USCG-2009-xxxx, at http://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Commander P.W. Clark, Designated
Federal Officer of NOSAC, or Mr. Jim Magill, Assistant Designated
Federal Officer, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Public participation is welcome and the
public may participate in person by coming to Room 1303, U.S. Coast
Guard Headquarters Building, 2100 Second Street, SW., Washington DC
20593 or by contacting CDR P.W. Clark at<PHONE_NUMBER> for call in
information. Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. App. 2.

Agenda of Meeting

    The agenda for the December 8, 2009 Committee meeting is as
follows:
    (1) Roll call of Committee members and the public participating in
the teleconference.
    (2) Approval of minutes from the November 5, 2009.
    (3) Subcommittee's Final Report on proposals for MARPOL Annex II,
A.673 standards for existing Offshore Supply Vessels (OSVs).
    (4) Committee discussion and vote on Subcommittee's Final Report
for MARPOL Annex II, A.673.
    (5) Review of and possible NOSAC action to approve a recommendation
to re-establish the Diving Subcommittee and discussion on a proposed
task statement to study the matter of medical treatment of injured
divers while working on the OCS.
    (6) Review of background information and possible NOSAC action
related to minimizing offshore lifts on the OCS.
    (7) Period for Public Comment.
    (8) Confirmation of the date/time for the next NOSAC Meeting
(Thursday, April 8, 2009 in New Orleans).

Procedural

    This meeting is open to the public. Please note that the meeting
may close early if all business is finished. At the

Chair's discretion, members of the public may make oral presentations
during the meeting. If you would like to make an oral presentation
during the teleconference, please notify the DFO no later than December
4, 2009. Written material for distribution to Committee members should
reach the Coast Guard no later than December 4, 2009.

Minutes

    Minutes from the meeting will be available for the public review
and copying 30 days following the teleconference meeting.

Information on Services for Individuals With Disabilities

    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact
Mr. Jim Magill at<PHONE_NUMBER> as soon as possible.

    Dated: November 10, 2009.
J.G. Lantz,
Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. E9-27634 Filed 11-17-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 9110-04-P