[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 22 (Wednesday, February 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 5731-5732]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01957]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 1894-207]

South Carolina Electric & Gas Company; South Carolina Parr
Hydroelectric Project; Notice of Proposed Revised Restricted Service
List for a Programmatic Agreement

    Rule 2010 of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's
(Commission) Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.2010, provides
that, to eliminate unnecessary expense or improve administrative
efficiency, the Secretary may establish a restricted service list for a
particular phase or issue in a proceeding concerning non-public
information. The restricted service list should contain the names of
persons on the service list who, in the judgment of the decisional
authority establishing the list, are active participants with respect
to the phase or issue in the proceeding for which the list is
established.
    The Commission staff is consulting with the Maine Historic
Preservation Commission (Maine SHPO) and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (Advisory Council) pursuant to the Advisory
Council's regulations, 36 CFR part 800, implementing section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, (54 U.S.C. 306108), to
prepare a Programmatic Agreement for managing properties included in,
or eligible for inclusion in, the National Register of Historic Places
at the existing Parr Hydroelectric Project.
    On November 18, 2014, Commission staff established a restricted
service list for the Parr Hydroelectric Project. Since that time, the
U.S. Forest Service requested to supplement the restricted service list
because of personnel changes. The restricted service list is
supplemented as follows:
    Replace ``Mike Harmon, U.S. Forest Service'' with ``James F. Bates
or Representative, U.S. Forest Service.''

    Dated: January 28, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-01957 Filed 2-2-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 90 (Friday, May 9, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26803-26804]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10660]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0050]

Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB). Under procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, before seeking OMB approval, Federal agencies must solicit
public comment on proposed collections of information, including
extensions and reinstatement of previously approved collections.
    This document describes one collection of information for which
NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before July 8, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by the docket number in
the heading of this document, by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on
the electronic docket site by clicking on ``Help'' or ``FAQ.''
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Regardless of how you submit comments, you should mention the
docket number of this document.
    You may call the Docket Management Facility at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the Public
Participation heading of the Supplementary Information section of this
document. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit http://www.dot.gov/privacy.html.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov, or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Glaceria Mason, Marketing Specialist,
Office of Communications and Consumer Information (NPO-520), National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Ave SE., W52-
211, Washington, DC 20590. Glaceria Mason's phone number is 202-366-
5876 and her email address is<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must first publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60-day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulation (at 5CFR
1320.8(d), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
    (i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected;

    (iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g. permitting electronic
submission of responses.
    In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA asks for public
comments on the following proposed collection of information for which
the agency is seeking approval from OMB:
    Title: Drunk Driver Segmentation Research
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from approval
date.
    Abstract: The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
(NHTSA) was established by the Highway Safety Act of 1970 (23 U.S.C.
101) to carry out a Congressional mandate to reduce the mounting number
of deaths, injuries, and economic losses resulting from motor vehicle
crashes on the Nation's highways. In support of this mission, NHTSA
proposes to conduct an email survey among 2,000 licensed drivers who
self-report having operated a motor vehicle or motorcycle (1,500 motor
vehicle drivers and 500 motorcycle riders) after drinking amounts of
alcohol that (in most circumstances) would render them legally drunk.
(Note: for brevity, ``drivers'' and ``driving'' will refer to both
motor vehicle and motorcycle operators in the remaining sections of
this document). The survey will request information about their drunk
driving behavior, rationale for that behavior, context details
surrounding the behavior, and opinions about drunk driving enforcement,
sanctions and other relevant issues. The findings will then be analyzed
to generate descriptions of various segments of at-risk drinker/drivers
that are based on common demographics, lifestyle traits, drinking
contexts and opinions. By having these segments delineated, NHTSA's
communications efforts to help curb drunk driving will be more focused,
more relevant to the intended audience, and more cost-effective.
    Summary of the Collection of Information: In this collection of
information, NHTSA is seeking to understand useful and relevant
characteristics (demography, lifestyle traits, drinking habits,
environmental factors, and opinions/perceptions of how drunk driving is
justified and enforcement of drunk driving laws) among people at high
risk of driving drunk. Furthermore, once data are collected, cluster
analyses will be applied to determine segments in which these
individuals can be assigned based on common traits and opinions. By
generating such segments, NHTSA can more effectively target meaningful
messages to key segments with the goal of curbing drunk driving
incidences, and therefore curbing the number of fatalities related to
drunk driving.
    Description of the Need for the Information and the Proposed Use of
the Information: NHTSA has successfully conducted at-risk drunk driving
segmentation studies previously; and by having these segments, NHTSA
and state partners have been able to use marketing communications
``best practices'' to target the intended population(s) in
communications efforts. However, no such study and segmentation
analysis have been conducted since 2007. Since that time, population
demography has changed, many state laws have changed as well as
attitudes about enforcement of the laws, and the media landscape--due
to rapid-pace development of digital-based media--has changed. As such,
a segmentation study is needed to better shape and tailor the messaging
and media strategies and tactics for addressing drunk driving. After
the data collection and segmentation analysis is completed, NHTSA's
Office of Communications and Consumer Information will be able to apply
the segmentation to its planning and implementations of social norming
and enforcement campaigns directed at people at high risk of driving
drunk. Additionally, NHTSA will make the data and segmentations
available to state partners, who can then complement and/or supplement
NHTSA's national communications efforts.
    Affected Public: NHTSA will conduct a national email survey among
people in the targeted age cohort of adults 21-54. Through a provider
of a national database of people in this age group who have previously
``opted-in'' to receive and respond to email research surveys, a brief
series of screening questions will be posed to determine respondents
who self-report drinking behavior prior to driving, and contingent on
their answers, determine which individuals have driven and/or are apt
to drive drunk After the screening, those individuals will be offered
the complete survey, which is projected to take up to 20 minutes to
complete. Ultimately, NHTSA will seek a total of 2,000 completed
surveys. Participation by all respondents will be voluntary and
anonymous and respondents will receive a token incentive for their
participation. Such incentives are set and administered by the sample
provider, and they sometimes take the form of cash in amounts that
typically range from $3 to $6 per person; other sample providers'
incentives take the form of points which respondents accumulate and
trade for merchandise and/or cash.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 2,342 hours.
    Number of Respondents: Initial sample (pre-screening)--33,500. The
completed survey sample (post-screening)--2,000, all of whom are among
the initial sample of 33,500.
    Comments are invited on: whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility
and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including
the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

John Donaldson,
Acting Senior Associate Administrator, Policy and Operations.
[FR Doc. 2014-10660 Filed 5-8-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


MEMORANDUM

DATE:		September 17, 2014

TO:		Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR - 2013-0602

FROM:	Angela Hackel, Office of Air Quality and Planning Standards, Office of Air and Radiation

SUBJECT:	September 17, 2004, meeting with WE ACT for Environmental Justice, regarding Proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY

A meeting was held between EPA and the attendees listed below on September 17, 2014 to discuss the proposed Carbon Power Plan for Existing Power Plants.

ATTENDEES

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Laura McKelvey, OAR
Ted Palma, OAR
Angela Hackel, OAR
Amanda Curry Brown, OAR
Arthur Zuco, OAR
Mikhail Adamantiades, OAR
Regina Chappell, OAR
Chebryll Edwards, OAR
Marguerite McLamb, OAR
Phil Lorang, OAR
Neal Fann, OAR
Marva King, OEJ

Outside Organizations

Mr. Brent Newell, Center for Race, Poverty & Environment
Rev. Leo Woodberry, Kingdom Living Temple
Dr. Nicky Sheats, New Jersey Environmental Justice Alliance/Thomas Edison State College
Dr. Cecilia Martinez, Center for Earth, Energy and Democracy
Dr. Erica Holloman, Southeast CARE Coalition
Ms. Sharon Lewis, Connecticut Coalition for Environmental Justice
Mr. Cecil Corbin-Mark, WE ACT for Environmental Justice
Dr. Jalonne L. White-Newsome, WE ACT for Environmental Justice