[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 167 (Tuesday, August 28, 2012)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 51948-51949]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21147]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Chapter 1

[Docket No. FAA-2012-0754]

Airport Improvement Program (AIP): Policy Regarding Access to
Airports From Residential Property; Correction

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Proposed policy; implementation of Section 136; opportunity to
comment; correction and extension of time to comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting an inadvertent omission in the Addresses
paragraph in the Proposed Policy Regarding Access to Airports From
Residential Property that was published in the Federal Register on July
30, 2012. The FAA is also extending the comment period to September 14,
2012.

DATES: The comment period for the proposed policy document published
July 30, 2012 (77 FR 44515), is extended to September 14, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randall S. Fiertz, telephone: (202)
267-3085; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Need for Correction

    On July 30, 2012, the Federal Aviation Administration published a
Notice of Proposed Policy in the Federal Register at 77 FR 44515
proposing an FAA policy, based on Federal law, concerning through-the-
fence access to a federally obligated airport from an adjacent or
nearby property, when that property is used as a residence. The Notice
also proposed to limit application of the FAA's previously published
interim policy (76 FR 15028; March 18, 2011) to commercial service
airports that certified existing residential through-the-fence access
agreements and rescind applicability of this interim policy with regard
to certain general aviation airports consistent with section 136 of
Public Law 112-95. In addition, that notice described how the FAA will
interpret provisions of the law pertaining to

residential through-the-fence access and invited comments.
    There was an inadvertent omission in the Notice which FAA is
correcting through this amendment. In the Addresses paragraph, the FAA
inadvertently omitted the applicable Department of Transportation
Docket Number.

Correction

    In the document published on July 30, 2012 (77 FR 44515) FR Doc.
2010-18058, on page 44515 in column 3, under the heading ADDRESSES
paragraph of this document, replace ``Docket Number FAA-2012-XXX'' with
``Docket Number FAA-2012-0754''.

Extension of Time To Comment

    The Experimental Aircraft Association requested the FAA extend the
comment period an additional two weeks. The FAA believes this is a
reasonable request and hereby extends the comment period to September
14, 2012.

    Dated: Issued in Washington, DC, on August 22, 2012.
Randall S. Fiertz,
Director, Airport Compliance and Management Analysis.
[FR Doc. 2012-21147 Filed 8-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: July 28, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 143)]
[Notices]
[Page 37211-37213]
[DOCID:fr28jy09-33]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0408; FRL-8936-3]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; EPA's WaterSense Program (Renewal); EPA ICR No.
2233.04, OMB Control No. 2040-0272

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request to renew an existing approved Information Collection
Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This ICR is
scheduled to expire on January 31, 2010. Before submitting the ICR to
OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific
aspects of the proposed information collection as described below.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 28, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2006-0408 by one of the following methods:
     http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>     Mail: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Hand Delivery: Public Reading Room, Room 3334, EPA West Building, 1301
Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.

    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2006-
0408. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.

Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://
www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov your
e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center
homepage at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tara O'Hare, OW, WaterSense Program
(7324U), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number: 202-
501-2396; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

How Can I Access the Docket and/or Submit Comments?

    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0408, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in
the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>,
and the telephone number for the Water Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use http://www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft
collection of information, submit or view public comments, access the
index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified in this document.

What Information Is EPA Particularly Interested in?

    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically
solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
    (iv) Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

What Should I Consider When I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

What Information Collection Activity or ICR Does This Apply to?

    Affected entities: Entities potentially affected by this action are
manufacturers, professional certifying organizations, businesses,
institutions, retailers, distributors, utilities, state and local
government, developers, landscape irrigation professionals and non-
governmental organizations (NGOs). Randomly sampled citizens will also
be affected.
    Title: EPA's WaterSense Program (Renewal).
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2233.04, OMB Control No. 2040-0272.
    ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on January
31, 2010. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed
either by publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate
means, such as on the related collection instrument or form, if
applicable. The display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: WaterSense is a voluntary program designed to create
self-sustaining markets for water-efficient products and services via a
common label. The program provides incentives for manufacturers to
design, produce, and market water-efficient products. In addition, the
program provides incentives for certified professionals (e.g. certified
irrigation auditors, designers, or installation and maintenance
professionals) to deliver water-efficient services. The program also
encourages consumers and commercial and institutional purchasers of
water-using products and systems to choose water-efficient products and
engage in water-efficient practices.
    As part of strategic planning efforts, EPA encourages programs to
develop meaningful performance measures, set ambitious targets, and
link budget expenditures to results. Data collected under this ICR will
assist WaterSense demonstrating results under and carrying out
evaluation efforts to ensure continual program improvement. In
addition, data will help EPA monitor market penetration and inform
future product categories and specifications.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 19
hours per response for organizational partners, who are not
manufacturers and who are not applying for an award. The average burden
is 35 hours for manufacturing partners who must also complete New

Certified Product Notification Forms. Award applicants are estimated to
spend an additional 20 hours on average to complete the awards
application. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 357 state and local government;
1,319 private sector organizations, and 668 individuals per year.
    Frequency of Response: Varies.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 57,248 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $4,665,618, including $1,793,181 in
operation & maintenance costs.

Are There Changes in the Estimates From the Last Approval?

    The overall burden estimate for this collection is 7,167 hours
higher than the burden estimated under the current ICR because the
WaterSense program has been launched and expanded since the current ICR
was approved. The change in burden reflects the substantial increase in
the number of products certified, new partners joining and reporting,
and the addition of the New Homes portion of the program. EPA also has
a better understanding of how long it takes partners to complete
program forms, now that the program is underway.

What Is the Next Step in the Process for This ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Dated: July 20, 2009.
James Hanlon,
Director, Office of Wastewater Management.
[FR Doc. E9-17927 Filed 7-27-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 7, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 34700]
[FR Doc No: C1-2022-11915]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4609-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2022-0001]

Tennessee; Amendment No. 6 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

Correction

    In notice document 2022-11915 appearing on page 33804 in the issue
of Friday, June 3, 2022, make the following correction:
    On page 33805, in the second column, in the line second from the
bottom, ``11905'' should read ``11915''.

[FR Doc. C1-2022-11915 Filed 6-3-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 0099-10-D


[Federal Register: December 7, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 233)]
[Notices]
[Page 64103]
[DOCID:fr07de09-931]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the
Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission will hold a Closed Meeting on Wednesday,
December 9, 2009 at 2 p.m.
    Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the
Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the Closed Meeting.
Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be
present.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (5), (6), (7), 9(ii) and (10), permit consideration of
the scheduled matters at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Aguilar, as duty officer, voted to consider the items
listed for the Closed Meeting in a closed session.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting scheduled for Wednesday,
December 9, 2009 will be:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    adjudicatory matters;
    a collection matter;
    post argument discussion; and
    other matters relating to enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items.
    For further information and to ascertain what, if any, matters have
been added, deleted or postponed, please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 2, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-29135 Filed 12-3-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 22, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23664-23666]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10862]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4267-011; ER10-2738-005; ER11-113-012; ER11-
4269-012; ER11-4270-011; ER11-4694-008; ER12-1680-009; ER14-1282-002;
ER15-2631-007; ER16-2169-003; ER16-2364-003; ER16-2412-006; ER16-2703-
004; ER17-2084-002; ER17-692-002.
    Applicants: Algonquin Energy Services Inc., Algonquin Power Sanger
LLC, Algonquin Power Windsor Locks LLC, Algonquin SKIC 20 Solar, LLC,
Algonquin SKIC 10 Solar, LLC, Algonquin Tinker Gen Co., Deerfield Wind
Energy, LLC, GSG 6, LLC, Liberty Utilities (Granite State Electric)
Corp., Luning Energy LLC, Minonk Wind, LLC, Odell Wind Farm, LLC, Sandy
Ridge Wind, LLC, The Empire District Electric Company, Great Bay Solar
I, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to April 9, 2018 Notice of Change in Status
of Algonquin Energy Services Inc., et al.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5353.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-618-012; ER12-2570-013.
    Applicants: Panther Creek Power Operating, LLC, Westwood Generation
LLC, Westwood Generation, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to June 30, 2017 Triennial Report for the
Northeast Region of Westwood Generation LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5097.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-855-000.
    Applicants: Panoche Valley Solar, LLC.
    Description: Report Filing: Refund Report of Panoche Valley Solar,
LLC to be effective N/A.

    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5284.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1599-001.
    Applicants: Ohio Valley Electric Corporation.
    Description: eTariff filing per 1450: Substitute Tariff Sheet to be
effective 3/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5281.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1628-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2018-05-15_Compliance for Order 842
Primary Frequency Response to be effective 5/15/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5295.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1629-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: Compliance Filing Pursuant to Final
Rule, Order No. 842, Docket No. RM16-6-000 to be effective 10/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5298.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1630-000.
    Applicants: Black Hills/Colorado Electric Utility Company, LP.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order No. 842 Compliance Filing to
be effective 5/15/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5299.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1631-000.
    Applicants: Black Hills Power, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order No. 842 Compliance Filing to
be effective 5/15/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5300.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1632-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Major Maintenance Cost
Component to Mitigated Start-Up and No-Load Offers to be effective 1/
15/2019.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5301.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1633-000.
    Applicants: Cheyenne Light, Fuel and Power Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order No. 842 Compliance Filing to
be effective 5/15/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5302.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1634-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Electric Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order No. 842 Compliance Filing--
Revisions to OATT Attachments M and N to be effective 5/15/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5310.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1635-000.
    Applicants: Western Interconnect LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order No. 842 Compliance Filing to
be effective 7/16/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5311.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1636-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2018-05-16 Tariff revisions
to Align PRA and Attachment Y Process to be effective 7/16/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5026.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1637-000.
    Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: TVA NITSA Service Agreement
No. 11 to be effective 4/16/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5039.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1638-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Duke Energy Progress, LLC,
Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
    Description: Joint Petition of the Duke Southeast Companies for
Waiver of Tariff Provisions.
    Filed Date: 5/15/18.
    Accession Number: 20180515-5343.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1639-000.
    Applicants: Constellation Mystic Power, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Constellation Mystic Cost of
Service to be effective 6/1/2022.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5048.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1640-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 1518R14 Arkansas Electric
Cooperative Corp NITSA NOA to be effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5050.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1641-000.
    Applicants: Realgy, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Realgy Market Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 5/17/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5052.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1642-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2888R3 Arkansas Electric
Cooperative Corp NITSA NOA to be effective 1/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5054.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1643-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Attachment AE
Section 11.1.4 to Remove the Term Control Area to be effective 7/16/
2018.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5057.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1644-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to OA, Schedule 6,
section 1.5 re: Order 1000 Lessons Learned Part I to be effective 7/16/
2018.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5070.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1645-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original WMPA SA No. 5075;
Queue No. AD1-071 to be effective 4/17/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1646-000.
    Applicants: Electric Energy, Inc.
    Description: eTariff filing per 1450: Show Cause Response of
Electric Energy LLC to be effective 3/21/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5093.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1647-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to OA, Schedule 6,
section 1.5 re: Order 1000 Lessons Learned Part II to be effective 7/
16/2018.
    Filed Date: 5/16/18.
    Accession Number: 20180516-5106.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/6/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following qualifying
facility filings:

    Docket Numbers: QF18-1286-000.
    Applicants: Broad Street Fuel Cell, LLC.
    Description: Form 556 of Broad Street Fuel Cell, LLC.
    Filed Date: 5/11/18.
    Accession Number: 20180511-5303.
    Comments Due: None-Applicable.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 16, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-10862 Filed 5-21-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24838-24839]
[FR Doc No: E9-12088]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12775-001]

City of Spearfish, South Dakota; Notice of Application Ready for
Environmental Analysis and Soliciting Comments, Recommendations, Terms
and Conditions, and Prescriptions

May 18, 2009.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Major Project.
    b. Project No.: 12775-001.
    c. Date Filed: September 10, 2008.
    d. Applicant: City of Spearfish, South Dakota.
    e. Name of Project: Spearfish Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On Spearfish Creek in Lawrence County, South Dakota.
The project occupies about 57.3 acres of United States lands within the
Black Hills National Forest administered by the U.S. Forest Service.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791 (a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Ms. Cheryl Johnson, Public Works
Administrator, City of Spearfish, 625 Fifth Street, Spearfish, SD
57783;<PHONE_NUMBER>; or e-mail at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    i. FERC Contact: Steve Hocking at<PHONE_NUMBER> or
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions, and prescriptions is 60 days from the issuance of this
notice; reply comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this
notice.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person on the official service list for the project. Further, if an
intervenor files comments or documents with the Commission relating to
the merits of an issue that may affect the responsibilities of a
particular resource agency, they must also serve a copy of the document
on that resource agency.
    Comments, recommendations, terms and conditions, and prescriptions
may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The
Commission strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
(http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ferconline.asp) under the ``e-filing''
link. For a simpler method of submitting text only comments, click on
``Quick Comment.''
    k. This application has been accepted and is now ready for
environmental analysis.
    l. The existing Spearfish Project consists of: (1) A 130-foot-long
gravity dam with an effective height of 4 feet; (2) a 0.32-acre
reservoir; (3) a gatehouse next to the dam that contains four 2-foot-
high, 4-foot-wide steel intake gates; (4) a 4.5-mile-long, 6.5-foot-
wide, 9-foot-high concrete-lined aqueduct; (5) a forebay pond; (6) two
1,200-foot-long, 48-inch diameter, wood stave pipelines; (7) four 36-
inch-diameter, 54-foot-high standpipe surge towers; (8) two 5,250-foot-
long, 30- to 34-inch diameter steel penstocks; (9) a reinforced
concrete powerhouse containing two Pelton turbines and two 2,000-
kilowatt (kW) generators; and (10) appurtenant facilities.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at (866)
208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for
inspection and reproduction at the address in item h above.
    All filings must (1) bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS,'' ``REPLY COMMENTS,'' ``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' ``TERMS AND
CONDITIONS,'' or ``PRESCRIPTIONS;'' (2) set forth in the heading the
name of the applicant and the project number of the application to
which the filing responds; (3) furnish the name, address, and telephone
number of the person submitting the filing; and (4) otherwise comply
with the requirements of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All
comments, recommendations, terms and conditions or prescriptions must
set forth their evidentiary basis and otherwise comply with the
requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may obtain copies of the
application directly from the applicant. Each filing must be
accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed on the service
list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in accordance with
18 CFR 4.34(b) and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    n. Public notice of the filing of the initial development
application, which has already been given, established the due date for
filing competing applications or notices of intent. Under the
Commission's regulations, any competing development application must be
filed in response to and in compliance with public notice of the
initial development application. No competing applications or notices
of intent may be filed in response to this notice.
    o. A license applicant must file no later than 60 days following
the date of issuance of this notice: (1) A copy of the water quality
certification; (2) a copy of the request for certification, including
proof of the date on which the certifying agency received the request;
or (3) evidence of waiver of water quality certification.
    p. Procedural Schedule: The application will be processed according
to the following revised Hydro Licensing Schedule. Revisions to the
schedule will be made as appropriate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
All stakeholders: recommendations,    July 17, 2009.
 terms, and conditions due.
All stakeholders: reply comments due  August 31, 2009.

FERC issues draft environmental       November 3, 2009.
 assess (EA).
All stakeholders: draft EA comments   December 3, 2009.
 due.
All stakeholders: modified terms and  February 1, 2010.
 conditions due.
FERC issues final EA................  March 30, 2010.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-12088 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 122 (Friday, June 26, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Page 30664]
[FR Doc No: E9-15124]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

Notice of Informational Filing

    For informational purposes only, the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) is providing notice that it has received an
informational filing from BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) to conduct
testing of Configuration VI of BNSF's Electronic Train Management
System (ETMS) submitted pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 236.913. The informational filing is described below,
including the submitting party and the requisite docket number where
the informational filing and any related information may be found. The
document is available for public inspection; however, FRA is not
accepting public comment on the document.

BNSF Railway Company (Docket Number FRA-2006-23687)

    BNSF has submitted an informational filing to FRA to begin
operational testing of ETMS Version VI on BNSF's Scenic Subdivision.
This testing will allow BNSF to obtain the necessary assessments
required to amend BNSF's currently approved Product Safety Plan (PSP)
for ETMS Version I for a future submittal to the FRA. In addition, this
testing will allow BNSF to substantiate the ETMS technology in tunnel
operations on freight territories. The informational filing has been
placed under Docket Number FRA-2006-23687 and is available for public
inspection.
    Interested parties are invited to review the informational filing
and associated documents at the DOT Docket Management facility during
regular business hours (9 a.m.--5 p.m.) at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. All documents in the public docket
are also available for inspection and copying on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications received into any of our dockets by name of the
individual submitting the document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages
19477-78).

    Issued in Washington, DC on June 22, 2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E9-15124 Filed 6-25-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65273-65275]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26013]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73453; File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2014-118]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 7.16(f)(v) To Provide That Proactive if Locked Modifiers
Will Be Ignored for Short Sale Orders During a Short Sale Period

October 28, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on October 15, 2014, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.16(f)(v)
to provide that Proactive if Locked Modifiers will be ignored for short
sale orders during a Short Sale Period. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text

of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV
below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to amend NYSE Arca Equities Rule
7.16(f)(v) (``Rule 7.16'') to provide that Proactive if Locked
Modifiers will be ignored for short sale orders during a Short Sale
Period.
    Rule 7.16(f) sets forth how the Exchange handles short sale orders
when the provisions of paragraph (b)(1) of Rule 201 of Regulation SHO
are in effect.\4\ Rule 7.16(f)(b)(ii)(sic) provides that the Exchange
will not execute or display a short sale order for a covered security,
as defined in Rule 201 of Regulation SHO, at a price that is less than
or equal to the current national best bid (``NBB'') if the listing
market for such security has determined that the price of the covered
security decreased by 10% or more from the prior day's closing price
(``Short Sale Price Test''). Consistent with paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of
Rule 201 of Regulation SHO,\5\ Exchange Rule 7.16(f)(iv) defines a
Short Sale Period as the period during which sell orders marked short
are subject to a Short Sale Price Test. Rule 7.16(f)(v) further
specifies how the Exchange handles short sale orders during the Short
Sale Period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1).
    \5\ 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to add new Rule 7.16(f)(v)(G) to specify how
the Exchange will handle short sale orders that include a Proactive if
Locked Modifier during a Short Sale Period. As defined in Rule
7.31(hh), a Proactive if Locked Modifier is available for limit orders
and if so designated, the Exchange will route the order to another
market center pursuant to Rule 7.37(d) for the away market's displayed
size in the instance in which the other market center has locked the
order and the locking market has not resolved the locked market
situation in a timely manner based upon average response times from
other market centers. If the order routed from the Exchange to another
market center is not executed in its entirety, the Exchange shall post
the order or portion thereof on the Exchange's book. Proactive if
Locked Modifiers are only available for Exchange-listed securities.
    As proposed, the Exchange will ignore Proactive if Locked Modifiers
applied to short sale orders for a security that is in a Short Sale
Period. The Exchange believes that it is appropriate to ignore the
Proactive if Locked Modifier for short sale orders during a Short Sale
Period because it would reduce the possibility that the Exchange will
route a short sale order priced at or below the NBB to another market
center. Instead, the Exchange will handle the short sale order
consistent with the existing provisions of Rule 7.16(f)(v), as
applicable, which may include re-pricing the order to a Permitted Price
\6\ or rejecting the order, if so designated by the ETP Holder.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ A Permitted Price is one minimum price increment above the
NBB. Rule 7.16(b)(v)(C).
    \7\ See Rule 7.16(b)(v)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange will announce the implementation date of the systems
functionality associated with the proposed rule change by Trader Update
to be published no later than 30 days following the effective date. The
implementation date will be no later than 30 days following the
issuance of the Trader Update.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5),\9\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to, and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that ignoring the Proactive if Locked
Modifier for short sale orders during a Short Sale Period will remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market
because it will reduce the possibility that the Exchange will route a
sell short order priced at or below the NBB to another market center.
Rule 201(b)(1)(i) of Regulation SHO \10\ requires that a trading center
prevent the execution or display of a short sale order at a price that
is less than or equal to the NBB, but is silent on whether a trading
center can route a short sale order during a Short Sale Period that is
priced less than or equal to the NBB. The Exchange believes, however,
that it is appropriate and promotes just and equitable principles of
trade to reduce the possibility that the Exchange would route a sell
short order during a Short Sale Period that is priced less than or
equal to the NBB, as the receiving away market would otherwise be
required to prevent the display or execution of such order consistent
with Rule 201 of Regulation SHO. The Exchange therefore believes that
by ignoring Proactive if Locked Modifiers for short sale orders during
a Short Sale Period, the Exchange would comply with Rule 201 of
Regulation SHO by handling the order consistent with other provisions
of Rule 7.16(f)(v) and not shift that responsibility to an away market.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 242.201(b)(1)(i)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes the
proposed rule change removes a burden on competition because it reduces
the possibility that the Exchange would route a sell short order during
a Short Sale Period that is priced less than or equal to the NBB, which
otherwise would have shifted the responsibility for that sell short
order to an away market. As proposed, the Exchange would instead be
responsible for handling that sell short order, consistent with
existing Rule 7.16(f)(v) and Rule 201 of Regulation SHO.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)

of the Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \13\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2014-118 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2014-118. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090. Copies of the filing will also be
available for inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office and
on its Internet Web site at www.nyse.com. All comments received will be
posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEARCA-2014-118 and should be
submitted on or before November 24, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26013 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 249 (Tuesday, December 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78541-78543]
[FR Doc No: 2014-30442]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73906; File No. SR-CHX-2014-20]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
to Amend the Trading Permit Application Fee

December 22, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on December 15, 2014, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S. C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    CHX proposes to amend the Trading Permit application fee. The text
of this proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
(www.chx.com) and in the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule changes and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Section A of the Fee Schedule to
increase the Trading Permit application fee from $200 to $2,000 per
application.\3\ The Trading Permit application fee is essentially a new
Participant application fee, as every active Participant must hold a
Trading Permit and no Participant may hold more than one Trading
Permit.\4\ The Exchange submits that the current fee is no longer
commensurate with the actual cost associated with the Exchange's
comprehensive review of Trading Permit applications. Thus, the Exchange
believes it is appropriate to increase the Trading Permit application
fee to be identical to similar fees of other national securities
exchanges, like NASDAQ and NASDAQ BX.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ CHX Article 1, Rule 1(aa) defines ``Trading Permit'' as ``a
permit issued by the Exchange, granting the holder a revocable
license to execute approved securities transactions through the
Exchange's Trading Facilities, or to have those transactions
executed on its behalf.''
    \4\ CHX Article 3, Rule 2(e) provides that ``all Trading Permits
must be held by active Participant Firms'' and ``no Participant Firm
shall hold more than one Trading Permit.''
    \5\ See NASDAQ and NASDAQ BX fee schedules, both of which assess
a $2,000 fee per new member application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also proposes to replace the term ``Trading Permit''
after ``$2000/'' with the more accurate term ``application,'' as the
fee is currently assessed per application. For example, a separate
Trading Permit application fee is, and will continue to be, assessed
for each Trading Permit application submitted after (1) a withdrawal of
an application by a prospective Participant or (2) rejection of an
application by the Exchange. The Exchange believes that this amendment
will clarify that if a prospective Participant submits more than one
Trading Permit application, regardless of the reason, the prospective
Participant will be assessed the proposed Trading Permit application
fee for each application. Incidentally, the Exchange also proposes to
adopt language indicating that the fee is non-refundable.
    The Exchange also proposes to eliminate the new Participant Firm
registration fee of $200 under Section C. In light of the proposed
increase to the Trading Permit application fee, the Exchange believes
that the new Participant Firm registration fee is unnecessary.
    Aside from increasing the Trading Permit application fee to $2,000
per application and the elimination of the new Participant Firm
registration fee of $200, the Exchange does not propose to
substantively modify any other fees, assessments, credits or rebates.
Operative Date
    The Exchange proposes to make this proposed rule change operative
January 2, 2015.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) of the Act \7\ in particular, as the
proposed rule provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among members and other persons using its
facilities. The Exchange believes that the proposed increase of the
Trading Permit application fee from $200 to $2,000 per application
equitably allocates fees among prospective Participants in a non-
discriminatory manner as it will be assessed to all prospective
Participants. Similarly, the proposed elimination of the new
Participant Firm registration fee equitably allocates fees among
prospective Participants in a non-discriminatory manner as it will no
longer be assessed to any prospective Participants. Moreover, the
proposed Trading Permit application fee is reasonable in light of the
fact that it is identical to similar fees of other national securities
exchanges, like NASDAQ and NASDAQ BX.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S. C. 78f.
    \7\ 15 U.S. C. 78f(b)(4).
    \8\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. To the contrary, the
proposed Trading Permit application fee will enhance competition as it
would be identical to similar fees of other national securities
exchanges, such as NASDAQ and NASDAQ BX.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \10\ and subparagraph(f)(2) of Rule
19b-4 thereunder \11\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee or
other charge imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S. C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is
consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the
following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File No. SR-CHX-2014-20 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-2014-20. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the

Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please
use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the
Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule changes between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S. C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing
in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the CHX. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-2014-20 and should be
submitted on or before January 20, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-30442 Filed 12-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 92 (Monday, May 15, 2017)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22301-22303]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09763]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2017-0079]
RIN 1625-AA87

Security Zone; Delaware River, Schuylkill River; Philadelphia, PA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to establish a permanent security
zone within portions of the Delaware River, and Schuylkill River, for
the protection of Very Important Persons (VIP) who arrive and depart
from Philadelphia International Airport, Philadelphia, PA. This rule is
necessary to expedite the establishment and enforcement of the security
zones when short notice is received by the Coast Guard for VIP(s)
traveling to the Philadelphia area. This rule will ensure safety and
security for the visiting VIP. The permanent security zone will be
enforced only during times of VIP transit and will restrict vessel
traffic while the zone is being enforced. Only vessels or people
specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port, Delaware Bay, or
designated representative may enter or remain in the regulated area.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before June 14, 2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2017-0079 using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. See the ``Public Participation and Request for
Comments'' portion of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for further
instructions on submitting comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email Petty Officer Amanda Boone, U.S. Coast Guard,
Sector Delaware Bay, Waterways Management Division, Coast Guard;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code
COTP Captain of the Port
VIP Very Important Persons

II. Background, Purpose, and Legal Basis

    On occasion VIP(s) will arrive and depart Philadelphia
International Airport, Philadelphia, PA, located within Coast Guard
Sector Delaware Bay Captain of the Port (COTP) zone. These VIP visits
require the implementation of heightened security measures for
protection of VIP(s) who may travel over or on portions of the Delaware
River and Schuylkill River.
    The purpose of this rulemaking is to protect the VIP and the public
from destruction, loss, or injury from sabotage, subversive acts, or
other malicious or potential terrorist acts.
    The Coast Guard proposes this rulemaking under authority in 33
U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

III. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    The Coast Guard proposes to establish a permanent security zone
within portions of the Delaware River and Schuylkill River for the
protection of VIP's who arrive and depart from Philadelphia
International Airport, Philadelphia, PA. This rule is necessary to
expedite the establishment and enforcement of security zones when short
notice is provided to the COTP for

VIPs traveling to or from Philadelphia include the following areas:
    (1) All waters of the Delaware River in the vicinity of
Philadelphia International airport, within an area bound to the west by
a line drawn from the New Jersey shoreline at Thompson Point, latitude
39[deg]50'37'' N., longitude 75[deg]18'23'' W., thence northwest to the
Pennsylvania shoreline at latitude 39[deg]51'45'' N., longitude
75[deg]18'46'' W.; thence up river and bound shoreline to shoreline;
bound to the east by a line drawn from the New Jersey shoreline at
latitude 39[deg]52'28'' N., longitude 75[deg]11'14'' W., and thence
northwest to the Pennsylvania shoreline near the eastern side of mouth
to the Schuylkill River at latitude 39[deg]53'05'' N., longitude
75[deg]11'34'' W.; the security zone extends north into the waters of
Schuylkill River, bound from shoreline to shoreline, including the
waters of Schuylkill River adjacent to the Navy Yard Reserve Basin
Bridge, and terminates along a line drawn from latitude 39[deg]54'04''
N., longitude 75[deg]12'56'' W., thence eastward across the Schuylkill
River to latitude 39[deg]54'07'' N., longitude 75[deg]12'48'' W.,
located approximately 500 yards northwest and parallel with the George
C. Platt Memorial--Penrose Avenue lift-bridge.

IV. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders and
we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. This NPRM has not been designated
a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, the NPRM has not been reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget.
    The Coast Guard determined that this rulemaking would not be a
significant regulatory action for the following reasons: Although the
security zone area covers only a large portion of the navigable
waterways, mariners may request permission from COTP Coast Guard Sector
Delaware Bay or the designated representative to transit or remain in
the security zone. Furthermore the duration of the security zone would
not significantly impact vessel because of the small amount of time it
takes for VIP transits to and from the airport. Advance notifications
would be made to the local maritime community by issuance of Local
Notice to Mariners, Broadcast Notice to Mariners, Marine information
and facsimile broadcasts so mariners can adjust their plans
accordingly.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that
question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this proposed rule has implications for federalism or
Indian tribes, please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made
a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of
actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. This proposed rule adjusts rates in
accordance with applicable statutory and regulatory mandates. Normally
such actions are categorically excluded from further review under
section 2.B.2, and figure 2-1, paragraph

34(g) of the Instruction. Paragraph 34(a) pertains to minor regulatory
changes that are editorial or procedural in nature. A preliminary
Record of Environmental Consideration (REC) supporting this
determination is available in the docket where indicated under the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble. We seek any comments or information
that may lead to the discovery of a significant environmental impact
from this proposed rule.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.

V. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We view public participation as essential to effective rulemaking,
and will consider all comments and material received during the comment
period. Your comment can help shape the outcome of this rulemaking. If
you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation.
    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at http://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using http://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and the
docket, you may review a Privacy Act notice regarding the Federal
Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005, issue of the Federal
Register (70 FR 15086).
    Documents mentioned in this NPRM as being available in the docket,
and all public comments, will be in our online docket at http://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following that Web site's
instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online docket and sign up
for email alerts, you will be notified when comments are posted or a
final rule is published.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine Safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.557 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.557  Security Zone; Delaware River, and Schuylkill River,
Philadelphia, PA.

    (a) Location. The following areas are security zones: All waters of
the Delaware River in the vicinity of Philadelphia International
airport, within an area bound to the west by a line drawn from the New
Jersey shoreline at Thompson Point, latitude 39[deg]50'37'' N.,
longitude 75[deg]18'23'' W., thence northwest to the Pennsylvania
shoreline at latitude 39[deg]51'45'' N., longitude 75[deg]18'46'' W.;
thence up river and bound shoreline to shoreline; bound to the east by
a line drawn from the New Jersey shoreline at latitude 39[deg]52'28''
N., longitude 75[deg]11'14'' W., and thence northwest to the
Pennsylvania shoreline near the eastern side of mouth to the Schuylkill
River at latitude 39[deg]53'05'' N., longitude 75[deg]11'34'' W.; the
security zone extends north into the waters of Schuylkill River, bound
from shoreline to shoreline, including the waters of Schuylkill River
adjacent to the Navy Yard Reserve Basin Bridge, and terminates along a
line drawn from latitude 39[deg]54'04'' N., longitude 75[deg]12'56''
W., thence eastward across the Schuylkill River to latitude
39[deg]54'07'' N., longitude 75[deg]12'48'' W., located approximately
500 yards northwest and parallel with the George C. Platt Memorial--
Penrose Avenue lift-bridge.
    (b) Definitions. The following definitions apply to this section:
    (1) Designated representative. A designated representative is any
Coast Guard commissioned, warrant or petty officer who has been
designated by the COTP to act on his or her behalf. The designated
representative may be on an official patrol vessel or may be on shore
and will communicate with vessels via VHF-FM radio or loudhailer. In
addition, members of the Coast Guard Auxiliary may be present to inform
vessel operators of this regulation.
    (2) Official patrol vessels. Official patrol vessels may consist of
any Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, State, or local law enforcement
vessels assigned or approved by the COTP.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations
contained in Sec.  [thinsp]165.33, entry into or movement within this
zone is prohibited unless authorized by the COTP, Sector Delaware Bay
or designated representative.
    (2) To request permission to enter the regulated area contact the
COTP or the COTP's representative on VHF-FM channel 16. Vessel
operators and persons within the security zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative. No person may swim upon or below the surface
of the water of this security zone unless authorized by the COTP or his
designated representative.
    (3) Upon being hailed by an official patrol vessel or the
designated representative, by siren, radio, flashing light or other
means, the operator of the vessel shall proceed as directed. Failure to
comply with lawful direction may result in expulsion from the regulated
area, citation for failure to comply, or both.
    (d) Enforcement. This security zone will be enforced with actual
notice by the U.S. Coast Guard representatives on scene, as well as
other methods listed in 33 CFR 165.7.

    Dated: May 8, 2017.
Benjamin A. Cooper,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2017-09763 Filed 5-12-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 201 (Tuesday, October 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71748-71749]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25119]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2016-0301]

Navigation Safety Advisory Council

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of Federal advisory committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Navigation Safety Advisory Council will meet in Tampa,
Florida to discuss matters relating to maritime collisions, rammings,
and groundings, Inland Rules of the Road, International Rules of the
Road, navigation regulations and equipment, routing measures, marine
information, diving safety, and aids to navigation systems. These
meetings will be open to the public.

DATES: The Navigation Safety Advisory Council will meet on Wednesday,
November 2, 2016, from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and on Thursday, November
3, 2016, from 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Please note these meetings may close
early if the Council has completed its business.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Hilton Saint Petersburg
Bayfront, 333 1st Street S., Saint Petersburg, Florida 33701-4342. The
hotel Web site http://www3.hilton.com/en/hotels/florida/hilton-st-petersburg-bayfront-SPTSHHF/index.html.
    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact
Mr. Lahn listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT as soon as possible.
    Instructions: To facilitate public participation, written comments
on the issues in the ``Agenda'' section below must be submitted no
later than October 30, 2016 if you want Council members to be able to
review your comments before the meeting. You must include ``Department
of Homeland Security'' and the docket number, USCG-2016-0301. Written
comments may also be submitted using Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. For technical difficulties, contact Mr. Lahn
listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. Comments received will be
posted without alteration at http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding the Federal Docket Management System in the March 24, 2005,
issue of the Federal Register (70 FR 15086).
    Docket Search: For access to the docket to read documents or
comments related to this notice, go to http://www.regulations.gov
insert USCG-2016-0301 in the Search box, press Enter, and then click on
the item you wish to view.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about these
meetings, please contact Mr. George Detweiler, the Navigation Safety
Advisory Council Alternate Designated Federal Officer, Commandant (CG-
NAV-2), U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop
7418, Washington, DC 20593, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Mr. Burt Lahn, Commandant (CG-NAV-2),
U.S. Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Avenue SE., Stop 7418,
Washington, DC 20593, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is in compliance with
the Federal Advisory Committee Act, Title 5 United States Code,
Appendix.
    The Navigation Safety Advisory Council is an advisory committee
authorized in 33 U.S.C. 2073 and chartered under the provisions of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act. The Navigation Safety Advisory Council
provides advice and recommendations to the Secretary, through the
Commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard, on matters relating to prevention
of maritime collisions, rammings, and groundings, Inland and
International Rules of the Road, navigation regulations and equipment,
routing measures, marine information, diving safety, and aids to
navigation systems.

Agenda

    Wednesday, November 2, 2016: The Navigation Safety Advisory Council
members will receive presentations on the following topics from agency
representatives who performed the studies:
    (1) The Vessel Traffic Service Study conducted by the National
Transportation Safety Board; and
    (2) The Atlantic and Gulf Coast Seacoast Waterways and Analysis
Management System Study being conducted by the Coast Guard.
    Following the above presentations, the Designated Federal Officer
will form subcommittees to continue discussions on the following task
statements:
    (1) Navigation Safety Advisory Council Task 16-01 Review the
navigation safety consequences of ships using Ultra Low Sulphur Fuel
Oil and recommend measures to mitigate those consequences; and
    (2) Navigation Safety Advisory Council Task 16-02 Develop criteria
for reporting ``near miss'' incidents.
    Public comments or questions will be taken during the meeting as
the Council discusses each issue and prior to the Council formulating
recommendations on each issue. There will also be a public comment
period at the end of the meeting.
    Thursday, November 3, 2016:
    (1) Subcommittee discussions continued from Wednesday, November 2,
2016;
    (2) Subcommittee reports presented to the Council;
    (3) New Business; and
    a. Summary of Navigation Safety Advisory Council action items.
    b. Schedule next meeting date--Summer, 2017.
    c. Council discussions and acceptance of new tasks.

    A public comment period will be held after the discussion of new
tasks. Speakers are requested to limit their comments to 10 minutes
each. Public comments or questions will be taken at the discretion of
the Designated Federal Officer during the discussion and
recommendations, and new business portion of the meeting. Please
contact Mr. Lahn, listed in the FOR FURTHER

INFORMATION CONTACT section, to register as a speaker.

    Dated: October 13, 2016.
M. D. Emerson,
Director, Marine Transportation Systems.
[FR Doc. 2016-25119 Filed 10-17-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P