[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 73481-73483]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29805]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2011-0720; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-252-AD;
Amendment 39-16867; AD 2011-24-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400 series airplanes. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an
aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    There has been one reported incident where the main landing gear
(MLG) failed to extend during testing of the MLG alternate release
system. Investigation revealed that the door release lever bushing
was worn, causing an increase in the lateral movement of the release
cable system. An increase in free-play within the release cable
system would cause additional wear to the door release lever bushing
and may lead to the turnbuckle fouling against the nacelle frame.
The bushing wear at the door release lever and turnbuckle fouling
could cause a failure in the alternate release system, preventing
the landing gear from extending in the case of a failure of the
normal MLG extension/retraction system.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is loss of control during landing. We are issuing
this AD to require actions to correct the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD becomes effective January 3, 2012.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of January 3,
2012.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Fabio Buttitta, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New
York 11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to include an AD that would apply to the specified products.
That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on August 1, 2011 (76
FR 45713). That NPRM proposed to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    There has been one reported incident where the main landing gear
(MLG) failed to extend during testing of the MLG alternate release
system. Investigation revealed that the door release lever bushing
was worn, causing an increase in the lateral movement of the release
cable system. An increase in free-play within the release cable
system would cause additional wear to the door release lever bushing
and may lead to the turnbuckle fouling against the nacelle frame.
The bushing wear at the door release lever and turnbuckle fouling
could cause a failure in the alternate release system, preventing
the landing gear from extending in the case of a failure of the
normal MLG extension/retraction system.
    This [Transport Canada Civil Aviation] directive is to mandate
the incorporation of a new maintenance task to prevent excessive
free-play of the turnbuckle and cable within the alternate release
system.

The unsafe condition is loss of control during landing. You may obtain
further information by examining the MCAI in the AD docket.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comment received.

Request To Refer to Revision Incorporating Temporary Revision

    Horizon Air Industries, Inc. (the commenter) requested that we
revise paragraph (g) of the NPRM (76 FR 45713, August 1, 2011) to
reference Revision 7, dated June 5, 2010, of the Bombardier Q400 Dash 8
Maintenance Requirements Manual (MRM), PSM 1-84-7, instead of
Bombardier Temporary Revision (TR) MRB-46, dated February 4, 2010, to
Section 1-32, Systems/Powerplant Maintenance Program, of the
Maintenance Review Board (MRB) Report Part 1, of the Bombardier Q400
Dash 8 MRM, PSM 1-84-7. The commenter explained that this TR was
removed from this MRM by Revision 7 of this MRM; therefore, this TR
does not exist. The commenter reasoned that referencing Bombardier TR
MRB-46 in the final rule will force operators to request an alternative
method of

compliance to use Revision 7 of this MRM, because this TR is no longer
included in this MRM. The commenter suggested that, if the AD must
reference the same document as Canadian AD CF-2010-26, dated August 17,
2010, then a paragraph needs to be added to the final rule allowing
operators to remove this TR once it is incorporated into the manual by
the general revision.
    We agree that operators should be allowed to remove Bombardier TR
MRB-46 once it is included in the general revision of the Bombardier
MRM. Therefore, we have revised this final rule to add a note following
paragraph (g) of this final rule to allow operators to remove
Bombardier TR MRB-46, dated February 4, 2010, once it has been included
in the general revisions of the Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 MRM. We have
revised the final rule and re-identified subsequent notes accordingly.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the available data, including the comment received, and
determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting the
AD with the changes described previously. We determined that these
changes will not increase the economic burden on any operator or
increase the scope of the AD.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have required different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow our FAA policies. Any such differences
are highlighted in a NOTE within the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 65 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 1 work-hour per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD to the U.S. operators to be $5,525, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains the NPRM (76 FR 45713, August 1,
2011), the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other
information. The street address for the Docket Operations office
(telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

2011-24-03 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-16867. Docket No. FAA-
2011-0720; Directorate Identifier 2010-NM-252-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective January
3, 2012.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model DHC-8-400, -401,
and -402 airplanes, certificated in any category, having serial
numbers 4001 and subsequent.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
Gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    There has been one reported incident where the main landing gear
(MLG) failed to extend during testing of the MLG alternate release
system. Investigation revealed that the door release lever bushing
was worn, causing an increase in the lateral movement of the release
cable system. An increase in free-play within the release cable
system would cause additional wear to the door release lever bushing
and may lead to the turnbuckle fouling against the nacelle frame.
The bushing wear at the door release lever and turnbuckle fouling
could cause a failure in the alternate release system, preventing
the landing gear from extending in the case of a failure of the
normal MLG extension/retraction system.
* * * * *
The unsafe condition is loss of control during landing.

Compliance

    (f) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Actions

    (g) Within 30 days after the effective date of this AD, revise
the maintenance program by incorporating Task 323400-203 specified
in Bombardier Temporary Revision (TR) MRB-46, dated February 4,
2010, to Section 1-32, Systems/Powerplant Maintenance

Program, of the Maintenance Review Board (MRB) Report Part 1, of the
Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7.
The initial compliance time for the actions specified in Bombardier
TR MRB-46, dated February 4, 2010, is within 6,000 flight hours
after the effective date of this AD. Thereafter, operate the
airplane according to the procedures and compliance times in
Bombardier TR MRB-46, dated February 4, 2010.

    Note 1: The revision required by paragraph (g) of this AD may be
done by inserting a copy of Bombardier TR MRB-46, dated February 4,
2010, into Section 1-32, Systems/Powerplant Maintenance Program, of
the Maintenance Review Board (MRB) Report Part 1, of the Bombardier
Q400 Dash 8 Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7. When
Bombardier TR MRB-46, dated February 4, 2010, has been included in
general revision of the Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Maintenance
Requirements Manual, the Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Maintenance
Requirements Manual may be removed from Bombardier TR MRB-46, dated
February 4, 2010, provided that the relevant information in the
general revision is identical to that in Bombardier TR MRB-46, dated
February 4, 2010.

No Alternative Actions, Intervals, and/or Critical Design Configuration
Control Limitations (CDCCLs)

    (h) After accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (g)
of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g., inspections), intervals,
and/or CDCCLs may be used unless the actions, intervals, and/or
CDCCLs are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (i) of this
AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 2: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (i) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York Aircraft Certification Office (ACO), ANE-170, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using
any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

Related Information

    (j) Refer to MCAI Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2010-26,
dated August 17, 2010; and Bombardier Temporary Revision MRB-46,
dated February 4, 2010, to Section 1-32, Systems/Powerplant
Maintenance Program, of the Maintenance Review Board Report Part 1,
of the Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM
1-84-7; for related information.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (k) You must use Bombardier Temporary Revision MRB-46, dated
February 4, 2010, to Section 1-32, Systems/Powerplant Maintenance
Program, of the Maintenance Review Board Report Part 1, of the
Bombardier Q400 Dash 8 Maintenance Requirements Manual, PSM 1-84-7,
to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone (416) 375-
4000; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at
the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information that
is incorporated by reference at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on November 8, 2011.
Kalene C. Yanamura,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-29805 Filed 11-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 221 (Wednesday, November 16, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71108-71111]
[FR Doc No: 2011-29551]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary of Transportation

[Docket No. OST-2011-0202]

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records Notice

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice to establish a new system of records.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of Transportation's Office of the Secretary of
Transportation (DOT/OST) intends to establish a DOT-wide System of
Records under the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a) to create and
maintain civil rights program records which are not covered by the
Government-wide System of Records Notices (SORNs) of the Office of
Personnel Management [OPM/GOVT-1] and the Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission [EEOC/GOV-1]. OPM/GOVT-1 covers general personnel records
pertaining to Federal employees and EEOC/GOV-1 covers equal employment
opportunity records pertaining to claims by Federal employees and
applicants for Federal employment who allege they have been
discriminated against by a Federal agency under Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended; Section 15 of the Age Discrimination in
Employment Act, Section 501 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended; and the Equal Pay Act.
    The DOT system, known as the Departmental Office of Civil Rights
System (DOCRS), is used to track

correspondence, inquiries, complaints, and appeals filed by
individuals, small business, or representatives of individuals or small
business who believe they have been subjected to prohibited
discrimination or retaliation by a DOT Federally-assisted or Federally-
conducted program or activity. DOCRS is more thoroughly detailed below
and in the Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) prepared for the information
technology (IT) system that DOT uses for its internal and external
civil rights programs. The PIA can be found on the DOT Privacy Web site
at http://www.dot.gov/privacy.

DATES: Effective December 16, 2011. Written comments should be
submitted on or before the effective date. DOT/OST may publish an
amended SORN in light of any comments received.

ADDRESSES: You may file comments identified by the docket number DOT-
OST-2011-0202 by any of by any of the following methods:
    [cir] Federal Rulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov
and follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
    [cir] Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    [cir] Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday
through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
    [cir] Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: You must include the agency name and docket number
DOT-OST-2011-0202 or the Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for the
rulemaking at the beginning of your comment. All comments received will
be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received in any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.) You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you may visit http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov or to the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
docket.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions, please contact:
Joseph E. Austin, Associate Director, External Civil Rights Programs
Division, Departmental Office of Civil Rights, Office of the Secretary
of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590, or<PHONE_NUMBER>. For privacy
issues, please contact: Claire Barrett, Departmental Chief Privacy
Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. DOT's Civil Rights Program

    DOT, through assigned civil rights personnel in each DOT component
(chiefly, the Departmental Office of Civil Rights (DOCR) within OST),
is responsible for ensuring that DOT does not discriminate against its
employees or applicants for employment (``internal''); enforcing civil
rights laws prohibiting discrimination and retaliation by DOT
Federally-assisted and Federally-conducted programs and activities
against members of the public; and investigating and responding to
complaints filed by DOT employees pursuant to sections 504 and 508 of
the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (together, these three
activities comprise DOT's ``external'' civil rights programmatic
responsibilities). DOT's enforcement activities with respect to this
program include:
    [ssquf] Documenting, investigating, and responding to ``internal''
and ``external'' civil rights complaints and inquiries;
    [ssquf] Conducting reviews of DOT Federally-funded recipients to
assess their compliance with civil rights laws; and
    [ssquf] Adjudicating and issuing written decisions in
administrative appeals filed with DOT/DOCR by small businesses
(including sole proprietorships) that have been denied certification as
a ``disadvantaged business enterprise'' (DBE) or airport concessions
DBE (ACDBE) by a DOT Federally-assisted recipient pursuant to 49 CFR
Parts 23 and 26.

II. The Privacy Act

    The Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a) governs the means by which the
Federal Government collects, maintains, and uses personally
identifiable information (PII) in a System of Records. A ``System of
Records'' is a group of any records under the control of a Federal
agency from which information about individuals is retrieved by name or
other personal identifier. The Privacy Act requires each agency to
publish in the Federal Register a System of Records notice (SORN)
identifying and describing each System of Records the agency maintains,
including the purposes for which the agency uses PII in the system, the
routine uses for which the agency discloses such information outside
the agency, and how individuals to whom a Privacy Act record pertains
can exercise their rights under the Privacy Act (e.g., to determine if
the system contains information about them and to contest inaccurate
information).
    Under the Privacy Act, an agency is permitted to exempt certain
types of systems from certain requirements of the Privacy Act, after
completing a formal rulemaking process to revise the agency's Privacy
Act regulations to add the system to the agency's list of exempt
systems. The XCRS system is eligible for exemption because it will
contain law enforcement investigatory material. On [date], DOT
published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) in the Federal
Register, proposing exemptions for this system. The NPRM can be
accessed through http://www.regulations.gov, Docket Number DOT-OST-
2011-0202. Comments on the proposed exemptions must be submitted to the
docket for that rulemaking, by any of the methods outlined in the NPRM.
Comments on other parts of the SORN must be submitted in writing, by
any of the methods outlined in this Notice.
    In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552a(r), a report on the establishment
of this System of Records has been sent to Congress and to the Office
of Management and Budget.
System Number: DOT/ALL-24

System name:
    Departmental Office of Civil Rights System.

Security classification:
    Unclassified, sensitive.

System location:
    Records are maintained by the DOT Departmental Office of Civil
Rights, and DOT component civil rights offices. The electronic records
systems are maintained on a server that is physically located at a
contractor facility in Sterling, Virginia. The server is hosted and
maintained by Micropact Engineering, Inc., headquartered in Herndon,
Virginia. The system owner is the Departmental Office of Civil Rights
(DOCR), S-30, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey

Avenue SE., Room W78-320, Washington, DC 20590.

Categories of individuals covered by the System of Records:
    Members of the public (including DOT employees filing complaints
pursuant to sections 504 and 508 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended) who have submitted inquiries, complaints, or appeals to DOT,
alleging discrimination by DOT or by third parties pertaining to DOT
Federally-assisted or DOT Federally-conducted programs or activities;
individuals who are the subjects of external civil rights inquiries,
complaints and appeals; and witnesses who are interviewed concerning
same.

Categories of records in the system:
    Records of civil rights discrimination inquiries, complaints, and
appeals received by DOT from members of the public, DOT employees,
small businesses or representatives of these groups; records compiled
during the investigation of the complaints and appeals; and records of
responsive actions taken by DOT, including complaint information,
statements, exhibits, reports and correspondence; records concerning
applications for certification as a disadvantaged business enterprise,
including business name, contact information, and name of business
owners. The records may contain the following personally identifiable
information (PII):
    [ssquf] Personal contact information for individual complainants,
complaint subjects, DBE appellants, and/or witnesses who are involved
in particular discrimination claims, such as name, home address, email
address, and home telephone number;
    [ssquf] Identification information and descriptive details about
individual complainants, such as the last four digits of the
complainant's Social Security Number, date of birth, race, color,
national origin, sex, religion, age (40 or over), disability, sexual
orientation, parental status, and/or genetic information; and
    [ssquf] Financial information pertaining to individual owners of
small businesses that have been denied ``disadvantaged business
enterprise'' (DBE) certification.

Authority for maintenance of the system:
    42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., Sec.  12101 et seq., 42 U.S.C. 6101 et
seq.; 29 U.S.C. 794, 749d; 49 U.S.C. 47113; and Executive Order 13160.

Purpose(s):
    DOT Civil Rights personnel use the contact information,
identification information, and descriptive details to document,
investigate, and respond to civil rights complaints, inquiries, and DBE
appeals, and to conduct reviews of Federally-funded recipients to
assess their compliance with civil rights laws. In DBE appeal cases,
DOT/DOCR staff use financial information when necessary to make
personal net worth determinations about sole proprietors claiming DBE
status. DOT may utilize contractors to assist with certain tasks; for
example, contractors may help DOCR analyze financial information for
personal net worth determinations in DBE appeal cases.

Routine uses of records maintained in the system, including categories
of users and the purposes of such uses:
    In addition to those disclosures generally permitted under 5 U.S.C.
552a(b) of the Privacy Act, all or a portion of the records of
information contained in this system may be disclosed outside of DOT as
a routine use pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3), as follows:
    A. To the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), including
United States Attorneys Offices, or other Federal agency conducting
litigation or in proceedings before any court, adjudicative or
administrative body, when it is necessary to the litigation and one of
the following is a party to the litigation or has an interest in such
litigation:
    1. DOT or any component thereof;
    2. Any employee of DOT in his/her official capacity;
    3. Any employee of DOT in his/her individual capacity where the DOJ
or DOT has agreed to represent the employee; or
    4. The United States, or any agency thereof, is a party to the
litigation or has an interest in such litigation and DOT determines
that the records are both necessary and relevant to the litigation and
the use of such records is compatible with the purpose for which DOT
collected the records.
    B. To recipients of Federal financial assistance, witnesses, or
consultants if necessary to assist DOCR in resolving civil rights
complaint or in obtaining additional information or expert advice
relevant to the investigation of a civil rights complaint.
    C. To an adjudicative body before which DOT or one of its
components is authorized to appear or to an individual or entity
designated by the DOT or otherwise empowered to resolve or mediate
disputes to the extent that the disclosure is necessary and relevant to
the litigation or alternative dispute resolution (ADR).
    D. To a party, counsel, representative or witness in a litigation
or ADR if relevant and necessary to the litigation or ADR.
    E. To a congressional office in response to an inquiry from that
congressional office made at the request of the individual to whom the
record pertains.
    F. To the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) or
other Federal government agencies pursuant to records management
inspections being conducted under the authority of Title 44 of the
United States Code.
    G. To an agency, organization, or individual for the purpose of
performing audit or oversight operations authorized by law, but only to
the extent that such information is necessary and relevant to the audit
of oversight function.
    H. To contractors and their agents, grantees, experts, consultants,
and others performing or working on a contract, service, grant,
cooperative agreement or other assignment for DOT, when necessary to
accomplish and agency function related to this system of records.
Individuals provided information under this routine use are subject to
the same Privacy Act requirements and limitations on disclosure as are
applicable to DOT officers and employees.
    I. To another Federal agency with responsibility for labor or
employment relations or other issues, including Equal Employment
Opportunity issues, when that agency has jurisdiction over issues
reported to the DOT Departmental Office of Civil Rights, or component
civil rights and civil liberties staff, and staff of components who do
not have a designated civil rights and civil liberties office, but who
perform related functions.
    J. To States, DOT Federal-funding recipients, and members of the
public, the following information regarding entities determined
ineligible for DBE certification: Business name, the business owner(s),
type and date of the denial, and name of the entity that made the
decision.
    K. See ``Prefatory Statement of General Routine Uses'' (available
at http://www.dot.gov/privacy/privacyactnotices).
    Other possible routine uses of the information, applicable to all
DOT Privacy Act systems of records, are published in the Federal
Register at 75 FR 82132, December 29, 2010, under ``Prefatory Statement
of General Routine Uses'' (available at http://www.dot.gov/privacy/privacyactnotices).

Disclosure to consumer reporting agencies:
    None.

Policies and practices for storing, retrieving, accessing, retaining,
and disposing of records in the system--
Storage:
    Records are maintained in an electronic database and in paper
files. Certain records are maintained only in paper files (for example,
financial documents, photographs, and audio recordings).

Retrievability:
    Records are retrieved by the complainant's, inquirer's, or DBE
appellant's name or case number, address, telephone number, or email
address.

Safeguards:
    Electronic files are stored in secure, password-protected
databases. Users must sign a Rules of Behavior document prior to being
granted access to the electronic systems. Any paper files and system-
generated reports containing PII are labeled as containing PII and are
stored in locked file cabinets and/or in a locked file room. Only the
System Administrator and authorized Civil Rights personnel in DOCR and
in each DOT component are allowed access to the files, and on a ``need-
to-know'' basis.

Retention and disposal:
    DOT is preparing a new records disposition schedule (Standard Form
115) for submission to the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA), which will include the following proposed retention periods:
    [ssquf] General Information: Destroy/delete 3 years after inquiry
date, unless needed longer for legal or audit purposes.
    [ssquf] Complaints and DBE Appeals: Destroy/delete 5 years after
final decision, unless needed longer for legal or audit purposes. A
redacted copy of the final decision (with PII removed) may be retained
longer for reference purposes.
    [ssquf] De-certifications and Denials: Delete immediately if
decision to de-certify or deny certification is reversed or rescinded.

System Manager and address:
    Director, Departmental Office of Civil Rights (DOCR), S-30, U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W78-320, Washington, DC 20590.

Notification procedure:
    At any time, an individual inquirer, complainant, or DBE appellant
may contact the System Manager to request access to review his or her
personal information in the system and request changes, as appropriate.
During the pendency of the investigation, DOT may deny the individual
access to the investigation files if necessary to avoid compromising
the investigation. The investigator may require that the request be
submitted in writing and include the requester's name, mailing address,
telephone number, and/or email address, a description of the records
requested, and a sworn statement (either a notarized statement or a
statement signed under penalty of perjury) that the requester is the
individual who he or she claims to be.

Record access procedure:
    Same as indicated under ``Notification procedure.''

Contesting record procedure:
    Same as indicated under ``Notification procedure.''

Record source categories:
    Information is obtained from individuals making inquiries;
correspondents; complainants; complaint subjects; DBE appellants;
interviewees; investigation reports; and review of records.

Exemptions claimed for the system:
    Pursuant to subsection (k)(2) of the Privacy Act (5 U.S.C. 552a),
because this system will contain investigatory material compiled for
law enforcement purposes, a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) is
pending to revise DOT's Privacy Act regulations (49 CFR part 10,
Appendix, part II) to exempt this system from the requirements of the
following Privacy Act subsections, for the reasons stated in the
proposed revision: (c)(3) (Accounting of Certain Disclosures), (d)
(Access to Records), (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I) (Agency Requirements), and
(f) (Agency Rules) to the extent that DOCRS contains investigatory
material compiled for law enforcement purposes.

    Issued in Washington, DC on November 9, 2011.
Claire Barrett,
Departmental Chief Privacy Officer.
[FR Doc. 2011-29551 Filed 11-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-62-P


Comment Info: =================

General Comment:KOLANZ MARC E, BRUSH WELLMAN INC; KOLANZ MARC E, BRUSH WELLMAN INC


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 57 (Thursday, March 24, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 16725]
[FR Doc No: 2022-06239]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD20-11-000]

Extension of Non-Statutory Deadlines; Supplemental Notice

    In response to emergency conditions caused by Novel Coronavirus
Disease (COVID-19), on May 8, 2020, the Secretary first waived the
Commission's regulations that require that filings with the Commission
be notarized or supported by sworn declarations.\1\ On December 8,
2021, the Secretary extended this waiver through March 31, 2022.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See, e.g., 18 CFR 45.7 (2021) (requiring application for
authority to hold interlocking positions to be verified under oath).
    \2\ Supplemental Notice Waiving Regulations, Extension of Non-
Statutory Deadlines, Docket No. AD20-11-000 (Dec. 8, 2021) (December
2021 Notice).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Many companies and individuals have continued to return to their
workplaces since issuance of the December 2021 Notice, and we expect
more will do so in the coming months. Further, the Secretary noted in
the December 2021 Notice that the Commission did not ``anticipate
issuing any further blanket extensions discussed herein after March 31,
2022.'' \3\ In light of improving conditions nationally, the Secretary
provides this notice that the Commission will not extend the blanket
waivers discussed herein after March 31, 2022. Beginning April 1, 2022,
the Commission expects that entities will comply in the ordinary course
with requirements in the Commission's regulations that filings be
notarized or supported by sworn declarations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Id. The Commission concurrently is issuing an order in
Docket No. EL20-37-000 allowing expiration of blanket waiver of
requirements to hold in-person meetings and/or to provide or obtain
notarized documents in open access transmission tariffs and other
Commission-jurisdictional agreements. Temporary Action to Facilitate
Social Distancing, 178 FERC ] 61,190 (2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission recognizes that there could be certain circumstances
that may warrant entity-specific waivers of these obligations after
March 31, 2022. This notice reminds entities that if they believe that
specific circumstances warrant continued relief from the requirements
addressed herein after March 31, 2022, they may request a case-specific
waiver. Such requests will be addressed at that time.

    Dated: March 18, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-06239 Filed 3-23-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P