[Federal Register: October 23, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 206)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 63098-63105]
[DOCID:fr23oc08-21]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 91

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1097; Notice No. 08-12]
RIN 2120-AJ31

Aircraft Noise Certification Documents for International
Operations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action would require operators of U.S. registered civil
aircraft flying outside the United States to carry aircraft noise
certification information on board the aircraft. This proposed rule is
needed to ensure that U.S. operators have consistent noise
certification information on board when they fly outside the United
States. The intended effect of this proposal is to ensure consistent
compliance with the International Civil Aviation Organization, Annex
16, Volume 1, Amendment 8 that requires certain noise information be
carried on board the aircraft.

DATES: Send your comments on or before January 21, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments identified by Docket Number FAA-2008-
1097 using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W12-
140, West

Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Bring comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    For more information on the rulemaking process, see the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
    Privacy: We will post all comments we receive, without change, to
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. Using the search function of our docket Web site, anyone can
find and read the electronic form of all comments received into any of
our dockets, including the name of the individual sending the comment
(or signing the comment for an association, business, labor union,
etc.). You may review DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you
may visit http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: To read background documents or comments received, go to
http://www.regulations.gov at any time and follow the online
instructions for accessing the docket. Or, go to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this proposed rule contact Laurette Fisher, Office of Environment and
Energy (AEE-100), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile
(202) 267-5594; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For legal questions
concerning this proposed rule contact Karen Petronis, Office of Chief
Counsel (AGC-200), Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules on aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, section 106 describes
the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation
Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's authority.
    This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, section 44715, Controlling aircraft
noise and sonic boom. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to measure and abate aircraft noise. This
proposed regulation is within the scope of that authority since it
would require certain operators to carry on board documentation listing
the noise characteristics of the aircraft. These characteristics are
already contained in the aircraft flight manual and approved as part of
the aircraft's airworthiness certification and compliance with 14 CFR
part 36.

Background

    Current U.S. regulations require that all U.S. aircraft comply with
the noise certification requirements of 14 CFR part 36. Part of that
certification includes the noise levels that were obtained during
certification testing. Section 36.1501 requires that these
certification noise levels be included in the Airplane Flight Manual
(AFM) or Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM). These manuals must be approved
by the FAA. Part 36 also contains two sections (36.1581 and 36.1583)
that describe the specific noise certification data to be included in
an FAA-approved AFM/RFM. However, there is no specific requirement for
the entire FAA-approved AFM to be carried on board an aircraft.
    For U.S. air carriers operating under part 121, a carrier is
allowed to create an Aircraft Operations Manual (AOM) or a Flight Crew
Operating Manual (FCOM) as an alternative to the AFM to be carried on
board the aircraft. That manual typically contains only the aircraft
limitations and performance information from the FAA-approved AFM. The
air carriers' flight, maintenance, and ground crews would normally use
these manuals. The AOM or FCOM may or may not contain the noise
characteristics pages from the FAA-approved AFM, depending on the
operator's needs and the manual's organization.
    Several years ago, the FAA became aware of instances in which U.S.
aircraft were detained at foreign airports when the noise status of the
airplane was questioned. In many cases, the flightcrew had not been
able to provide relevant information either because the AOM/FCOM did
not contain such information, or because the information was not
aggregated in one location in the on-board manual. Some foreign
authorities have asked U.S. flightcrews to either produce a noise
certificate or show the noise status of the airplane from on-board
documents.

ICAO Actions

    The issue of noise documentation has been addressed by the
Certificate Task Group (CTG) of the ICAO's Committee on Aviation
Environmental Protection. In 2001, Noise Technical Working Group 1 of
the CTG was tasked with examining the implementation of Annex 16 noise
certification documentation requirements, and the possible
international standardization of those documents. The CTG includes the
FAA and several representatives of the U.S. aviation industry among its
members.
    The CTG considered various options for standardization of documents
to be carried by aircraft operators. The ICAO member States use a
variety of administrative systems, with differing requirements for
noise documentation at certification and for designating documents that
must be carried on board. The CTG proposed three options designed to
accommodate these different practices. These three proposed options
were drafted with reference to existing regulatory systems in the
various States and incorporated into a new Attachment G to Annex 16
Amendment 8. The ICAO adopted Amendment 8 of Annex 16, Volume 1 on
February 23, 2005, and it became effective on November 24, 2005.
Section 1.4 of Annex 16 now requires that ``documents attesting noise
certification shall be approved by the State of Registry and required
by that State to be carried on the aircraft.'' Attachment G to
Amendment 8 provides the following three options for satisfying the
certification documentation requirements of sections 1.4 and 1.5.
    1. A stand-alone State-issued noise certificate in which the
mandatory information requirements of Annex 16, Volume 1, are contained
in a single document.
    2. Two complementary documents, one of which may be the Airplane
Flight Manual (AFM) or the Airline Operations Manual (AOM).
    3. Three complementary documents.
    Option 2 was designed to accommodate the system in effect in the
United States. One of the documents contemplated under this option was
an aircraft's airworthiness certificate, since it is issued only when
an aircraft has demonstrated compliance with part 36. However, since
U.S. airworthiness certificates do not contain any noise information,
the second document would contain the noise certification data that is
already required to be in the AFM/RFM.

    Currently, no specific format exists for the noise information
required to be in the AFM/RFM. In practice, the information may be
scattered over several pages and not easily located. Further, since
noise data is not required for inclusion in those parts of the manual
carried on board, flightcrews may not be familiar with or even have
access to this information.
    Before Amendment 8 was adopted in 2005, the noise documentation
section of Annex 16 was contained in a note and considered advisory
material. To address the difficulties that U.S. carriers had
experienced, the FAA published a draft notice of availability of
proposed Advisory Circular, entitled ``Guidance on Aircraft Noise
Certification Documents for International Flights'' (70 FR 60127,
October 14, 2005). That AC included an optional form on which operators
leaving the United States could compile the noise certification data
envisioned by the working group.
    With the adoption of Amendment 8 and the new paragraph 1.4, noise
documentation must now be carried on board all U.S. aircraft operating
outside the United States in order to comply with ICAO, Annex 16,
Volume I. We have determined that a regulatory change to require the
carriage of noise certification documents is necessary. We have chosen
to propose this as an operating requirement rather than a certification
requirement, because the information already exists in operators'
manuals and does not affect the certification basis of an airplane. As
an operating rule, it will not affect operators who do not leave the
United States.

Overview of the Proposed Rule

    We are proposing to amend part 91 to add a new paragraph in section
91.703 requiring operators that fly outside the United States using
aircraft subject to ICAO Annex 16 \1\ to carry aircraft noise
certification information onboard the aircraft.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ ICAO Annex 16, Volume I, Part II. Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.1
states that: The provisions of 1.2 to 1.6 shall apply to all
aircraft included in the classifications defined for noise
certification purposes in Chapters 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 and 12
of this part where such aircraft are engaged in international air
navigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    While the regulatory amendment is simple, we are seeking comment on
the proposed format of the documentation and the best place to have it
located on board the aircraft.
    Air carriers and other affected operators who leave the country are
encouraged to comment on the proposed regulation, and suggest workable
alternatives that could be applied to all operators who fly outside the
United States.
    We are including in this proposal a draft aircraft noise
documentation form. We anticipate that the information needed to
complete the form will be transferred by the operator from the approved
flight manual for each of an operator's aircraft. The form included in
this proposal is nearly identical to the one we published in the draft
Advisory Circular, and includes all of the information that was chosen
by Working Group 1 as necessary to comply with the ICAO requirement. We
have attempted to maintain the same format in an effort to make the
form readily recognizable to foreign authorities. Unless there is
compelling reason to do so, we do not plan on altering the placement of
information on the form. The FAA will seek approval from the Office of
Management and Budget to maintain it as an official form that we
recommend be carried on board.
    We would especially like to hear from those operators that chose to
complete the form as it was published in the draft AC, including where
they carry the form, how flightcrews are informed of its location, and
whether it has been requested in foreign operations.
    Use of this form is optional. An operator may choose to use the
appropriate flight manual pages that contain the required noise data as
its means of compliance with the documentation requirements of Annex
16. Alternatively, a carrier could develop its own documentation that
contains the required noise data. We caution operators that do not use
the FAA form to ensure that the materials they carry comply with the
requirements of Annex 16, Volume I, sections 1.4 and 1.5.
    We seek comment on the best place for the information, if compiled
into the recommended form or other single document, to be located on
board the aircraft. If it is to be carried on board as part of the AFM/
RFM/AOM/FCOM, should it have its own tabbed section, be an Appendix, or
be incorporated into another already familiar section? Is there a
better place for a document to be located that would be accessible to
the flightcrew and common to all operators? We will review the comments
and include our recommendations in the final rule.

Noise Certificates Not an Option

    The Working Group 1 discussions included a suggestion to the FAA
that we issue noise certificates as our means of compliance. While it
seems a simpler solution, the FAA does not have the legal authority to
issue noise certificates as other ICAO countries do.
    In a related issue, the form originally developed by Working Group
1 includes an approval by a Member State's certificating authority,
such as the FAA in the United States. The FAA will not be approving the
recommended form that contains the information. We interpret that
action to be legally indistinguishable from issuing a noise
certificate. Instead, as the draft form indicates, the information
contained on the page comes from an FAA-approved flight manual. The
FAA-approved noise certification data is part of the procedures for
operating aircraft and not considered a limitation or restriction. The
FAA has found that transfer of the FAA-approved noise data satisfies
the ICAO requirement that the information on board ``be approved by the
State of Registry.'' Each operator carries the burden of a one-time
correct transfer of the information for each of its aircraft.

The FAA Form

    Following is a draft of the form that we recommend operators use in
complying with this regulation. We anticipate that this form will be
available online from the FAA Web site; its particular location on the
site has not been decided, but is open for comment on accessibility.
Following the form is a description of the material that goes in each
section, adapted from the ICAO instructions.
    Use of this form, when properly completed and carried on board,
along with an airplane's airworthiness certificate, would demonstrate
compliance with the proposed regulation and with ICAO Annex 16, Volume
I, Part II Chapter 1, paragraphs 1.4 and 1.5. The information on this
form is not new, and is in each operator's FAA-approved flight manual
for each aircraft.
    The boxes in this form are numbered to maintain similarity with the
ICAO version. The descriptions of the information to be entered in
boxes 1-2 and 4-20 are not to be altered. Box 3 is optional for use by
the operator.
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P

[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP23OC08.023

BILLING CODE 4910-13-C
The following describes the data to be entered on the form:
    1. United States of America (ICAO-required name of member State).
    2. Title (Aircraft Noise Certification Information), plus the name
of the operator and contact information.
    3. Document number (optional for operator's use).
    4. The nationality or common mark and registration marks (in the
United States, N-number).
    5. The aircraft manufacturer and manufacturer's designation of the
aircraft (model and series, as appropriate).

    6. The aircraft serial number.
    7. The type and model of the subject aircraft's engine(s) (for
identification and verification of the aircraft configuration).
    8. For propeller-driven airplanes, the propeller type and model.
    9. The maximum takeoff mass and unit. The primary U.S. unit differs
from the international unit: The appropriate conversion factor can be
found in ICAO Annex 5. To avoid confusion, a U.S. operator may choose
to record weight/mass in both English and metric units. An example of a
conversion change from pounds to kilograms is shown below:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ In 1959, the directors of the national standards
laboratories of the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom,
Australia, New Zealand, and the Union of South Africa agreed on
common definitions of the customary length and mass units. They
define the pound avoirdupois as 0.453592 kg. The engineering
practice of using lbm for pound mass is obsolete.

Aircraft weight (pounds) conversion to aircraft mass (kilograms) \2\:

To convert aircraft weight from        to                                    Multiply by
    pound (lb)                        kilogram (kg)                         4.53592 E-01

Example: For a Boeing 747-400F that weighs 875,000 lb, 875,000 (lb) x 4.53592 E-01 (kg/lb) = 396,893 (kg)

    10. The maximum landing mass and unit. To avoid confusion, a U.S.
operator may choose to record weight/mass in both English and metric
units. See conversion example above.
    11. The Part 36 noise stage of the certificated aircraft. The
terminology of aircraft certification classification in the United
States is ``Stage'' rather than ``Chapter'' as used in Annex 16. The
U.S. term is recognized by ICAO and is not considered a difference from
Annex 16. Note that the term ``Stage'' is not applicable to airplanes
certificated under 14 CFR part 36, Subpart F.
    12. Any modifications to the aircraft incorporated for compliance
with applicable noise certification standards. This item should include
any modifications to the basic aircraft described in items 7 and 8.
    13. The lateral/full-power noise level, as certificated. Operators
of U.S.-registered aircraft must use the 14 CFR part 36 certificated
noise levels, expressed as Effective Perceived Noise Level (EPNdB).
Note: For 14 CFR part 36, appendix B, certifications that predate
Amendment 36-24 use the term ``sideline'' instead of ``lateral.''
    14. The approach noise level, as certificated. Operators of U.S.-
registered aircraft must use the 14 CFR part 36, appendices B or H
certificated noise levels, expressed as EPNdB.
    15. The flyover noise level, as certificated. Operators of U.S.-
registered aircraft must use the 14 CFR part 36 certificated noise
levels, expressed as EPNdB. For rotorcraft, certificated under
appendices H or J, noise levels are expressed as either EPNdB or A-
weighted Sound Exposure Level (dBA SEL), respectively. (Note: For 14
CFR part 36, appendix B certifications that predate Amendment 36-24 use
the term ``takeoff'' instead of ``flyover.'')
    16. The overflight noise level, as certificated. Operators of U.S.-
registered aircraft must include the 14 CFR part 36 certificated noise
levels. For small airplanes, certificated under appendix F, noise
levels are expressed as maximum A-weighted sound level (dBA). For
rotorcraft, certificated under appendices H or J, noise levels are
expressed as either EPNdB or A-weighted SEL (dBA SEL), respectively.
Note: The terminology describing this noise level in 14 CFR part 36 is
``flyover'' rather than ``overflight'' as used in Annex 16.
    17. The takeoff noise level, as certificated. Operators of U.S.-
registered aircraft must use the 14 CFR part 36, appendices G and H
certificated noise levels as described in item 16.
    18. A statement that the individual aircraft complies with the
applicable noise requirements of the U.S. regulations applicable to its
type and size.
    19. The date on which the noise certification document was created
by the operator.
    20. The signature of the official of the operator attesting to the
accuracy of the information in the FAA Form.
    Listing multiple aircraft with similar characteristics on the same
document will not be allowed. Only the data for the single aircraft
listed in the serial number and registration sections is to be listed
on this form. Failure to carry the correct information, regardless of
form, would be a violation of the regulation.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This proposal contains the following new information collection
requirements. As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3507(d)), the FAA has submitted the information requirements
associated with this proposal to the Office of Management and Budget
for its review.
    Title: Aircraft Noise Certification Documents For International
Operations.
    Summary: This proposal would add a new paragraph in Sec.  91.703
requiring operators that fly outside the United States, using aircraft
subject to International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), Annex 16,
to carry aircraft noise certification information on board the
aircraft. It would ensure that U.S. operators have the noise
certification information required to comply with CIAO Annex 16, Volume
I, Amendment 8 when flying outside the United States.
    Use of: This proposed rule would require operators of U.S.-
registered civil aircraft flying outside the United States to carry
aircraft noise certification information on board the aircraft. This
proposed rule is needed to ensure compliance with ICAO, Annex 16,
Volume 1, Amendment 8 that requires certain noise information be
carried on board aircraft that fly outside their state of registry. The
proposed rule would require that this information be easily accessible
to the flight crew and presentable upon request to the appropriate
foreign officials.
    Respondents (including number of): The likely respondents to this
proposed information requirement are operators of U.S.-registered
airplanes that fly outside the United States.
    Frequency: This form would be completed one time for each aircraft.
Thus, the annual frequency of information requirement is a one-time
initial response for each aircraft currently owned by the operator,
then once per new aircraft acquired or modified by an operator.
    Annual Burden Estimate: This proposal would result in an annual
recordkeeping and reporting burden as follows:
    The cost of the proposed rule per affected airplane was derived by
multiplying the technical writer's wage rate of $29.95 per hour by 0.25
hours required to complete the form, and adding to that the chief
pilot's wage rate of $79.48 per hour multiplied by 0.17 hours required
to review and sign the form. Thus, compliance with this

regulation would result in a per-airplane cost of $21. As a result, the
initial cost of the proposed rule would be $21 per aircraft times 5,066
aircraft, for a total of $106,386.
    The agency is soliciting comments to--
    (1) Evaluate whether the proposed information requirement is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (2) Evaluate the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden;
    (3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
    (4) Minimize the burden of collecting information on those who are
to respond, including by using appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms
of information technology.
    Individuals and organizations may send comments on the information
collection requirement by December 22, 2008, and should direct them to
the address listed in the ADDRESSES section at the end of this
preamble. Comments also should be submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Attention:
Desk Officer for FAA, New Executive Building, Room 10202, 725 17th
Street, NW., Washington, DC 20053.
    According to the 1995 amendments to the Paperwork Reduction Act (5
CFR 1320.8(b)(2)(vi)), an agency may not collect or sponsor the
collection of information, nor may it impose an information collection
requirement unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The OMB control number for this information collection will be
published in the Federal Register, after the Office of Management and
Budget approves it.

International Compatibility

    In keeping with U.S. obligations under the Convention on
International Civil Aviation, the FAA policy is to comply with
International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Standards and
Recommended Practices to the maximum extent practicable. The FAA has
reviewed the corresponding ICAO Standards and Recommended Practices and
is proposing this regulation as a means of compliance with Annex 16
regarding noise documentation carried on board aircraft that leave the
United States.

Regulatory Evaluation

    Changes to Federal regulations must undergo several economic
analyses. First, Executive Order 12866 directs that each Federal agency
shall propose or adopt a regulation only upon a reasoned determination
that the benefits of the intended regulation justify its costs. Second,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) requires
agencies to analyze the economic impact of regulatory changes on small
entities. Third, the Trade Agreements Act (Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits
agencies from setting standards that create unnecessary obstacles to
the foreign commerce of the United States. In developing U.S.
standards, this Trade Act requires agencies to consider international
standards and, where appropriate, that they be the basis of U.S.
standards. Fourth, the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104-4) requires agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs,
benefits, and other effects of proposed or final rules that include a
Federal mandate likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100
million or more annually (adjusted for inflation with base year of
1995). However, for regulations with an expected minimal impact, the
above-specified analyses are not required.
    The Department of Transportation Order DOT 2100.5 prescribes
policies and procedures for simplification, analysis, and review of
regulations. If the expected cost impact is so minimal that the
proposal or final rule does not warrant a full evaluation, this order
permits that a statement to that effect and the basis for it to be
included in the preamble if a full regulatory evaluation of the cost
and benefits is not prepared. Such a determination has been made for
this proposed rule. The reasoning for this determination follows:
    This proposed rule would require operators of U.S. registered civil
aircraft flying outside the United States subject to ICAO Annex 16,
Volume 1, Amendment 8, to carry aircraft noise certification data on
board the aircraft. Operators may comply with the proposed rule by
transferring the data from the Airplane Flight Manual to a suggested
form included in this rulemaking. Operators may also choose to carry
the required information in a different format. The proposed rule would
require that this information be easily accessible to the flight crew
and presentable upon request to the appropriate officials.
    The FAA was unable to determine the exact number of U.S. registered
aircraft that would be subject to this proposed rule. Therefore, the
FAA used (as an overestimate) the total number of passenger jet and
cargo jet aircraft registered to U.S. mainline carriers in its cost
computations. Based on the FAA Aerospace Forecast, there are a total of
5,066 aircraft currently registered to U.S. mainline air carriers
(1,034 cargo aircraft \3\ and 4,032 passenger jet aircraft \4\).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Table 21, U.S. Mainline Air Carriers, Cargo Jet Aircraft,
FAA Aerospace Forecast, FY 2008-2025.
    \4\ Table 20, U.S. Mainline Air Carriers, Cargo Jet Aircraft,
FAA Aerospace Forecast, FY 2008-2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the purposes of this analysis, we assume that operators would
choose to comply with the proposed rule by using the provided
recommended form. This form would be completed one time for each
aircraft. We estimate that completion of the form would require 15
minutes of a technical writer's time and 10 minutes of a chief pilot's
or chief engineer's time. The average wage rate for a technical writer
is $29.95 per hour \5\ after accounting for fringe benefits. The
average wage rate for a chief pilot or chief engineer is estimated at
$79.48 per hour \6\ after accounting for fringe benefits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ FAA, APO-310, N & O Rule Regulatory Evaluation.
    \6\ Hourly wage derived by taking median salary of $133,916 for
a chief pilot, dividing by 2080 hours per year, and multiplying by
the fringe benefit factor of 1.2345. Salary source: http://
swz.salary.com/salarywizard/layouthtmls/swzl_compresult_national_
TR20000019.html, last accessed June 30, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The cost of the proposed rule per affected airplane was derived by
multiplying the technical writer's wage rate of $29.95 per hour by 0.25
hours required to complete the form, and adding to that the chief
pilot's wage rate of $79.48 per hour multiplied by 0.17 hours required
to review and sign the form. Thus, compliance with this regulation
would result in a per-airplane cost of $21. As a result, the initial
cost of the proposed rule would be $21 per aircraft times 5,066
aircraft, for a total of $106,386. Operators may subsequently decide to
purchase or modify aircraft affected by the proposed rule. If they do
so, operators would incur an extra cost of $21 per additional airplane
to bring it into compliance with ICAO Annex 16, Volume 1, Amendment 8.
    This proposed rule would ensure that U.S. aircraft that fly abroad
are in compliance with ICAO Annex 16, Amendment 8. Operators would
benefit from the proposed rule by having the proper documentation
readily available for foreign authorities, avoiding delays and
detainment when noise certification status is questioned. The FAA
believes that the negligible cost of compliance with this rule is
outweighed by the benefit of compliance with the international
standard.

Regulatory Flexibility Determination

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required
to solicit and consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain
the rationale for their actions to assure that such proposals are given
serious consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
    Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.
    However, if an agency determines that a rule is not expected to
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities, section 605(b) of the RFA provides that the head of the
agency may so certify and a regulatory flexibility analysis is not
required. The certification must include a statement providing the
factual basis for this determination, and the reasoning should be
clear.
    This proposed rule would ensure that U.S. operators have consistent
noise certification information on board when they fly outside the
United States. This rule is needed to ensure compliance with the ICAO
Annex 16 that requires certain noise information be carried on board.
Under the proposed rule, each small entity would incur a one-time cost
of $21 per aircraft currently in its fleet. Operators may subsequently
decide to purchase or modify aircraft affected by the proposed rule; if
they do so, they would incur an extra cost of $21 per airplane to
comply. The FAA does not consider this a significant cost. Therefore,
the FAA certifies that this proposed rule would not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The FAA solicits
comments regarding this determination.

International Trade Impact Assessment

    The Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (Pub. L. 96-39) prohibits Federal
agencies from establishing any standards or engaging in related
activities that create unnecessary obstacles to the foreign commerce of
the United States. Legitimate domestic objectives, such as safety, are
not considered unnecessary obstacles. The statute also requires
consideration of international standards and, where appropriate, that
they be the basis for U.S. standards. The FAA has assessed the
potential effect of this proposed rule and has determined that it would
affect only those U.S. operators that conduct international operations.
The expected outcome of this proposed rule will be a minimal impact on
affected operators with the net benefits of ICAO compliance.

Unfunded Mandates Assessment

    Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-
4) requires each Federal agency to prepare a written statement
assessing the effects of any Federal mandate in a proposed or final
agency rule that may result in an expenditure of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation with the base year 1995) in any one
year by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by
the private sector; such a mandate is deemed to be a ``significant
regulatory action.'' The FAA currently uses an inflation-adjusted value
of $136.1 million in lieu of $100 million.
    This proposed rule does not contain such a mandate.

Executive Order 13132, Federalism

    The FAA has analyzed this NPRM under the principles and criteria of
Executive Order 13132, Federalism. We determined that this action will
not have a substantial direct effect on the States, or the relationship
between the Federal Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government,
and, therefore, does not have federalism implications.

Environmental Analysis

    FAA Order 1050.1E identifies FAA actions that are categorically
excluded from preparation of an environmental assessment or
environmental impact statement under the National Environmental Policy
Act in the absence of extraordinary circumstances. The FAA has
determined this rulemaking action qualifies for the categorical
exclusion identified in paragraph 312f and involves no extraordinary
circumstances.

Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy, Supply, Distribution, or
Use

    The FAA has analyzed this NPRM under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (May 18, 2001). We have determined that it is not
a ``significant energy action'' under the executive order because it is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866,
and it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.

Additional Information

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. We also
invite comments relating to the economic, environmental, energy, or
federalism impacts that might result from adopting the proposals in
this document. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion
of the proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and
include supporting data. To ensure the docket does not contain
duplicate comments, please send only one copy of written comments, or
if you are filing comments electronically, please submit your comments
only one time.
    We will file in the docket all comments we receive, as well as a
report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA personnel
concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this proposal, we
will consider all comments we receive on or before the closing date for
comments. We will consider comments filed after the comment period has
closed if it is possible to do so without incurring expense or delay.
We may change this proposal in light of the comments we receive.

Proprietary or Confidential Business Information

    Do not file in the docket information that you consider to be
proprietary or confidential business information. Send or deliver this
information directly to the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. You must mark the
information that you consider proprietary or confidential. If you send
the information on a disk or CD-ROM, mark the outside of the disk or
CD-ROM and also identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is proprietary or confidential.
    Under 14 CFR 11.35(b), when we are aware of proprietary information
filed with a comment, we do not place it in the docket. We hold it in a
separate file to which the public does not have access, and we place a
note in the docket that we have received it. If we

receive a request to examine or copy this information, we treat it as
any other request under the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552).
We process such a request under the DOT procedures found in 49 CFR part
7.

Availability of Rulemaking Documents

    You can get an electronic copy of rulemaking documents using the
Internet by--
    1. Searching the Federal eRulemaking Portal (http://
www.regulations.gov);
    2. Visiting the FAA's Regulations and Policies Web page at http://
www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/; or
    3. Accessing the Government Printing Office's Web page at http://
www.gpoaccess.gov/fr/index.html.
    You can also get a copy by sending a request to the Federal
Aviation Administration, Office of Rulemaking, ARM-1, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. Make
sure to identify the docket number, notice number, or amendment number
of this rulemaking.
    You may access all documents the FAA considered in developing this
proposed rule, including economic analyses and technical reports, from
the internet through the Federal eRulemaking Portal referenced in
paragraph (1).

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 91

    Aircraft, Noise control, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend chapter I of title 14, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:

PART 91--GENERAL OPERATING AND FLIGHT RULES

    1. The authority citation for part 91 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 1155, 40103, 40113, 40120, 44101,
44111, 44701, 44709, 44711, 44712, 44715, 44716, 44717, 44722,
46306, 46315, 46316, 46504, 46506, 46507, 47122, 47508, 47528-47531,
articles 12 and 29 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation
(61 stat 1180).
    2. Section 91.703 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(5) to read as
follows:

Sec.  91.703  Operations of civil aircraft of U.S. registry outside of
the United States.

    (a) * * *
    (5) For aircraft subject to ICAO Annex 16, carry on board the
aircraft documents that summarize the noise operating characteristics
and certifications of the aircraft that demonstrate compliance with
this part and Part 36 of this chapter.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC on October 17, 2008.
Carl Burleson,
Director, Office of Environment and Energy.
[FR Doc. E8-25271 Filed 10-22-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 5 (Monday, January 8, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Page 871]
[FR Doc No: 2018-00212]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Pub. L. 94-409, that the Securities
and Exchange Commission Fixed Income Market Structure Advisory
Committee will hold a public meeting on Thursday, January 11, 2018 at
9:30 a.m.

PLACE:  The meeting will be held in Multi-Purpose Room LL-006 at the
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC.

STATUS:  The meeting will begin at 9:30 a.m. and will be open to the
public. Seating will be on a first-come, first-served basis. Doors will
open at 9:00 a.m. Visitors will be subject to security checks. The
meeting will be webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:  On December 15, 2017, the Commission
published notice of the Committee meeting (Release No. 34-82338)
indicating that the meeting is open to the public (except during that
portion of the meeting reserved for an administrative work session
during lunch) and inviting the public to submit written comments to the
Committee. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a majority
of the Commission may attend the meeting.
    The agenda for the meeting will focus on liquidity in the bond
markets as well as various administrative items.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  For further information, please
contact Brent J. Fields from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-
5400.

Brent J. Fields,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-00212 Filed 1-4-18; 4:15 pm]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 14 (Monday, January 23, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4071-4072]
[FR Doc No: 2023-01190]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0716]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Changes in
Permissible Stage 2 Airplane Operations

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was
published on May 27, 2022. The collection involves information used to
issue special flight authorizations for non-revenue transports and non-
transport jet operations of Stage 2 airplanes at U.S. airports. Only a
minimal amount of data is requested to identify the affected parties
and determine whether the purpose for the flight is one of those
enumerated by law. This collection is required under the Airport Noise
and Capacity Act of 1990 and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of
2012.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by February 22, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandy Liu by email at:
[email protected]; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0652.
    Title: Changes in Permissible Stage 2 Airplane Operations.
    Form Numbers: FAA Form 1050-8.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on May 27, 2022 (87 FR 32224). This collection is
required under the Airport Noise and Capacity Act of 1990 (as amended
by Pub. L. 106-113) and the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012.
This information is used by the FAA to issue special flight
authorizations for nonrevenue operations of transports and non-
transport jet Stage 2 airplanes at U.S. airports. Only minimal amount
of data is requested to identify the affected

parties and determine whether the purpose for the flight is one of the
ones enumerated in the law.
    Respondents: Approximately 21 applicants.
    Frequency: Information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 15 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 5.25 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 18, 2023.
Sandy Liu,
Engineer, Noise Division, Office of Environment and Energy, Noise
Division, E-100.
[FR Doc. 2023-01190 Filed 1-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


6.4 Anticipated Resource Constraints The resource constraint of most concern is the funding needed to implement some of the local control measures. NCDAQ and the local EAC areas are both looking for grant opportunities to help fund EAC initiatives. Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 50 March 31, 2004 APPENDIX A EMISSION SOURCES BY COUNTY Stationary Point Sources Emissions County CO NOx VOC Alamance Co 0.061 0.676 0.960 Alexander Co 0.014 0.004 2.099 Ashe Co 0.030 0.006 1.289 Beaufort Co 1.162 1.969 0.859 Bertie Co 0.162 0.227 1.101 Bladen Co 0.181 1.857 0.520 Brunswick Co 3.758 7.786 3.453 Buncombe Co 1.336 57.016 3.135 Burke Co 5.753 0.516 12.838 Cabarrus Co 0.173 2.867 5.213 Caldwell Co 0.444 0.139 30.539 Carteret Co 0.008 0.083 0.000 Catawba Co 4.192 112.800 22.153 Chatham Co 7.014 20.487 3.800 Chowan Co 0.028 0.137 0.010 Cleveland Co 0.687 3.790 2.486 Columbus Co 12.211 6.987 3.885 Craven Co 3.585 4.175 4.196 Cumberland Co 0.412 2.956 7.072 Dare Co 0.008 0.271 0.004 Davidson Co 2.466 12.859 23.927 Davie Co 0.078 0.039 3.841 Duplin Co 0.888 1.978 0.017 Durham Co 0.301 1.046 5.706 Edgecombe Co 0.347 5.818 0.020 Forsyth Co 1.917 8.835 20.874 Franklin Co 0.009 0.101 0.122 Gaston Co 3.083 70.313 8.958 Graham Co 0.017 0.020 1.450 Granville Co 0.294 0.105 2.661 Guilford Co 0.158 1.829 40.535 Halifax Co 12.957 11.343 1.002 Harnett Co 0.204 0.563 0.464 Haywood Co 6.879 11.915 4.067 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 51 March 31, 2004 County CO NOx VOC Henderson Co 0.023 0.400 5.133 Hertford Co 0.017 0.148 0.828 Hoke Co 0.004 0.019 3.829 Iredell Co 2.927 8.949 5.109 Jackson Co 0.004 0.045 0.000 Johnston Co 0.018 0.145 2.218 Lee Co 0.971 0.235 1.403 Lenoir Co 0.110 2.429 0.592 Lincoln Co 0.118 2.551 2.368 Mc Dowell Co 0.645 0.609 2.221 Martin Co 23.577 9.479 6.539 Mecklenburg Co 2.616 2.914 22.978 Mitchell Co 0.113 0.015 2.193 Montgomery Co 0.047 0.008 0.017 Moore Co 0.015 0.003 1.826 Nash Co 0.442 0.928 0.491 New Hanover Co 36.352 76.530 5.676 Northampton Co 0.123 0.273 0.195 Onslow Co 0.073 0.955 0.016 Orange Co 3.223 0.748 0.009 Pasquotank Co 0.011 0.018 1.122 Pender Co 0.012 0.022 0.007 Person Co 5.063 188.510 1.706 Pitt Co 0.322 0.624 1.549 Randolph Co 0.021 0.058 2.528 Richmond Co 0.025 0.101 0.002 Robeson Co 0.612 18.817 1.994 Rockingham Co 5.954 33.903 7.896 Rowan Co 1.290 30.602 10.634 Rutherford Co 1.890 41.944 3.548 Scotland Co 0.501 7.276 5.356 Stanly Co 14.149 1.178 2.002 Stokes Co 7.872 341.620 0.945 Surry Co 5.356 0.942 5.817 Transylvania Co 0.183 5.212 2.858 Union Co 0.030 0.152 2.483 Vance Co 0.035 1.242 0.000 Wake Co 0.237 0.810 10.774 Washington Co 0.001 0.004 0.000 Watauga Co 0.015 0.051 0.001 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 52 March 31, 2004 County CO NOx VOC Wayne Co 6.873 37.740 3.048 Wilkes Co 3.232 0.731 7.472 Wilson Co 0.177 2.020 2.376 Yadkin Co 0.000 0.000 0.092 State total 196.096 1172.466 357.102 Stationary Area Sources Emissions County CO NOx VOC Alamance Co 3.51 0.74 7.71 Alexander Co 1.47 0.15 2.95 Alleghany Co 0.50 0.09 0.89 Anson Co 2.62 0.53 2.24 Ashe Co 1.25 0.14 1.50 Avery Co 0.81 0.11 1.02 Beaufort Co 17.77 0.61 12.42 Bertie Co 2.12 0.14 2.90 Bladen Co 4.26 0.42 4.46 Brunswick Co 5.08 0.64 4.57 Buncombe Co 4.71 1.31 14.23 Burke Co 3.15 0.55 6.27 Cabarrus Co 3.80 1.07 6.84 Caldwell Co 2.53 0.31 4.78 Camden Co 4.87 0.08 2.55 Carteret Co 10.09 0.61 6.93 Caswell Co 2.46 0.23 1.65 Catawba Co 4.60 0.90 12.14 Chatham Co 2.46 0.50 3.65 Cherokee Co 1.14 0.13 2.15 Chowan Co 1.63 0.10 1.42 Clay Co 0.40 0.08 0.56 Cleveland Co 5.14 0.84 7.25 Columbus Co 6.50 0.41 7.36 Craven Co 5.04 0.77 6.98 Cumberland Co 15.31 3.34 22.74 Currituck Co 4.30 0.13 2.46 Dare Co 1.65 0.13 2.13 Davidson Co 6.02 1.35 10.66 Davie Co 2.52 0.26 2.57 Duplin Co 8.32 0.45 6.68 Durham Co 2.61 1.88 16.40 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 53 March 31, 2004 County CO NOx VOC Edgecombe Co 5.67 1.22 5.88 Forsyth Co 5.33 1.54 14.36 Franklin Co 5.19 0.29 3.63 Gaston Co 4.10 1.76 12.04 Gates Co 1.18 0.09 1.34 Graham Co 0.45 0.08 0.45 Granville Co 3.50 0.38 3.15 Greene Co 6.06 0.17 3.11 Guilford Co 10.27 4.13 26.45 Halifax Co 3.57 0.91 4.17 Harnett Co 6.80 0.78 6.02 Haywood Co 2.06 0.32 4.36 Henderson Co 3.44 0.75 5.20 Hertford Co 1.17 0.12 1.90 Hoke Co 3.32 0.20 2.29 Hyde Co 6.38 0.07 3.63 Iredell Co 5.28 0.99 8.84 Jackson Co 1.49 0.23 2.00 Johnston Co 9.60 1.08 10.43 Jones Co 1.44 0.11 1.48 Lee Co 2.19 0.75 4.24 Lenoir Co 7.82 0.41 6.24 Lincoln Co 3.17 0.48 4.09 Mc Dowell Co 1.81 0.72 3.06 Macon Co 1.31 0.14 1.95 Madison Co 1.05 0.30 1.46 Martin Co 3.28 0.38 2.69 Mecklenburg Co 13.05 11.58 32.00 Mitchell Co 0.81 0.40 1.00 Montgomery Co 1.55 0.14 1.91 Moore Co 3.76 0.57 5.33 Nash Co 5.64 0.97 7.73 New Hanover Co 2.25 1.00 7.77 Northampton Co 2.75 0.39 1.91 Onslow Co 4.81 0.34 8.71 Orange Co 3.91 0.87 6.69 Pamlico Co 8.65 1.87 4.18 Pasquotank Co 9.77 0.13 5.21 Pender Co 4.66 0.21 3.74 Perquimans Co 4.64 0.10 3.12 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 54 March 31, 2004 County CO NOx VOC Person Co 4.45 0.41 2.74 Pitt Co 13.70 0.82 10.06 Polk Co 0.99 0.20 1.09 Randolph Co 5.89 0.78 9.82 Richmond Co 3.11 1.75 3.17 Robeson Co 19.68 1.45 16.70 Rockingham Co 6.30 1.03 5.91 Rowan Co 6.17 1.16 7.78 Rutherford Co 2.60 0.68 4.32 Sampson Co 10.48 0.36 7.84 Scotland Co 3.44 0.46 3.01 Stanly Co 5.11 0.29 4.81 Stokes Co 2.26 0.27 2.65 Surry Co 3.87 0.25 6.09 Swain Co 0.65 0.10 0.86 Transylvania Co 1.15 0.21 1.70 Tyrrell Co 7.03 0.07 3.50 Union Co 12.04 0.83 10.72 Vance Co 2.70 0.52 3.21 Wake Co 14.01 6.55 30.98 Warren Co 2.03 0.21 1.97 Washington Co 9.82 0.30 4.33 Watauga Co 1.38 0.15 2.71 Wayne Co 15.36 2.66 12.00 Wilkes Co 3.08 0.25 4.23 Wilson Co 7.26 1.30 6.96 Yadkin Co 2.82 0.16 3.54 Yancey Co 0.83 0.14 1.19 State Total 479.96 79.33 596.72 Nonroad Sources Emissions County CO NOx VOC Alamance Co 29.18 2.58 2.59 Alexander Co 4.11 0.51 0.40 Alleghany Co 2.58 0.39 0.21 Anson Co 4.38 1.08 0.52 Ashe Co 3.94 0.45 0.42 Avery Co 5.29 0.53 0.59 Beaufort Co 13.65 2.50 2.76 Bertie Co 6.31 1.67 1.15 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 55 March 31, 2004 County CO NOx VOC Bladen Co 8.67 1.55 1.32 Brunswick Co 26.98 1.99 4.76 Buncombe Co 47.91 4.18 4.76 Burke Co 14.94 1.72 1.54 Cabarrus Co 41.70 3.18 3.69 Caldwell Co 16.69 2.25 1.78 Camden Co 2.96 0.43 1.01 Carteret Co 46.96 1.84 14.15 Caswell Co 2.26 0.40 0.22 Catawba Co 46.58 4.65 4.49 Chatham Co 12.56 1.83 1.51 Cherokee Co 4.23 0.40 0.57 Chowan Co 3.97 0.48 1.13 Clay Co 2.18 0.19 0.39 Cleveland Co 21.14 2.04 1.92 Columbus Co 9.81 1.62 1.14 Craven Co 23.26 2.57 2.93 Cumberland Co 64.62 7.58 11.71 Currituck Co 14.97 0.74 4.58 Dare Co 45.32 1.27 17.81 Davidson Co 30.28 3.43 2.88 Davie Co 7.20 0.70 0.84 Duplin Co 9.94 2.50 1.04 Durham Co 67.33 8.78 6.52 Edgecombe Co 10.95 2.23 1.03 Forsyth Co 89.05 6.50 7.62 Franklin Co 7.82 0.98 0.81 Gaston Co 49.26 4.61 4.29 Gates Co 1.56 0.52 0.23 Graham Co 1.40 0.18 0.25 Granville Co 12.71 1.42 1.31 Greene Co 2.43 0.75 0.25 Guilford Co 182.94 13.51 16.09 Halifax Co 8.66 1.97 0.95 Harnett Co 21.12 1.83 1.88 Haywood Co 11.23 1.05 1.18 Henderson Co 29.86 2.02 3.64 Hertford Co 4.12 0.57 0.49 Hoke Co 3.44 0.65 0.31 Hyde Co 24.88 1.87 11.57 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 56 March 31, 2004 County CO NOx VOC Iredell Co 23.40 2.81 2.31 Jackson Co 6.85 0.57 0.78 Johnston Co 32.64 3.23 3.13 Jones Co 1.82 0.46 0.17 Lee Co 16.36 2.29 1.51 Lenoir Co 15.84 2.08 1.48 Lincoln Co 13.58 1.27 1.36 Mc Dowell Co 7.94 1.27 1.03 Macon Co 10.84 0.52 1.03 Madison Co 1.72 0.38 0.18 Martin Co 4.61 1.07 0.50 Mecklenburg Co 325.41 21.42 29.31 Mitchell Co 3.54 0.70 0.45 Montgomery Co 4.99 0.66 0.60 Moore Co 27.58 1.63 2.28 Nash Co 21.08 2.60 1.94 New Hanover Co 56.62 4.38 6.90 Northampton Co 4.28 1.14 0.69 Onslow Co 25.81 3.32 4.08 Orange Co 29.41 3.04 3.25 Pamlico Co 13.05 2.63 5.40 Pasquotank Co 9.74 0.90 1.51 Pender Co 12.46 1.01 1.85 Perquimans Co 3.91 0.64 1.28 Person Co 8.34 0.87 0.88 Pitt Co 23.98 3.16 2.19 Polk Co 2.89 0.44 0.25 Randolph Co 27.26 2.79 2.43 Richmond Co 14.22 5.12 1.60 Robeson Co 19.58 4.99 1.97 Rockingham Co 15.60 1.80 1.54 Rowan Co 27.64 4.01 2.72 Rutherford Co 12.77 1.67 1.25 Sampson Co 10.29 2.05 1.01 Scotland Co 8.52 1.21 0.91 Stanly Co 15.92 1.89 1.62 Stokes Co 7.77 0.61 0.77 Surry Co 28.71 1.76 2.63 Swain Co 4.71 0.32 1.13 Transylvania Co 14.82 0.69 2.40 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 57 March 31, 2004 County CO NOx VOC Tyrrell Co 6.53 0.63 2.92 Union Co 45.86 3.07 4.03 Vance Co 6.31 1.16 0.79 Wake Co 233.68 18.06 23.23 Warren Co 3.44 0.80 0.59 Washington Co 5.57 1.21 1.47 Watauga Co 9.95 0.51 1.16 Wayne Co 28.10 4.55 2.84 Wilkes Co 16.07 1.28 1.50 Wilson Co 22.44 2.68 2.14 Yadkin Co 6.52 0.75 0.58 Yancey Co 7.33 0.34 0.84 State Total 2411.63 235.13 293.64 Highway Mobile Sources Emissions County CO NOx VOC Alamance Co 107.43 14.92 9.43 Alexander Co 21.16 2.17 1.83 Alleghany Co 8.95 0.90 0.78 Anson Co 26.77 3.05 2.46 Ashe Co 19.45 1.89 1.72 Avery Co 17.39 1.87 1.56 Beaufort Co 38.64 3.91 3.54 Bertie Co 24.72 2.65 2.22 Bladen Co 37.65 3.75 3.29 Brunswick Co 74.31 8.08 6.67 Buncombe Co 178.76 27.37 15.47 Burke Co 80.26 13.91 6.89 Cabarrus Co 63.42 11.80 5.86 Caldwell Co 53.96 5.51 5.05 Camden Co 9.34 1.00 0.84 Carteret Co 55.26 6.04 5.06 Caswell Co 18.33 1.95 1.65 Catawba Co 122.92 15.90 11.16 Chatham Co 43.63 4.87 4.01 Cherokee Co 19.38 2.22 1.78 Chowan Co 10.51 1.07 0.95 Clay Co 6.42 0.67 0.55 Cleveland Co 77.65 10.50 6.91 Columbus Co 50.24 5.25 4.60 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 58 March 31, 2004 County CO NOx VOC Craven Co 64.58 6.80 6.10 Cumberland Co 223.26 30.32 20.98 Currituck Co 21.99 2.38 1.85 Dare Co 49.33 5.11 4.33 Davidson Co 150.84 27.56 12.92 Davie Co 37.20 8.36 3.07 Duplin Co 51.46 8.29 4.53 Durham Co 142.33 24.90 12.74 Edgecombe Co 45.16 4.52 4.15 Forsyth Co 207.45 32.63 20.60 Franklin Co 34.03 3.57 3.01 Gaston Co 90.70 17.44 8.71 Gates Co 10.46 1.17 0.95 Graham Co 5.44 0.52 0.49 Granville Co 48.29 9.91 4.14 Greene Co 16.62 1.68 1.46 Guilford Co 274.51 44.36 27.54 Halifax Co 60.25 12.55 5.15 Harnett Co 70.89 10.13 6.33 Haywood Co 67.59 14.74 5.71 Henderson Co 64.43 10.18 5.67 Hertford Co 19.29 2.00 1.70 Hoke Co 20.66 2.23 1.85 Hyde Co 5.58 0.57 0.48 Iredell Co 135.50 30.72 11.44 Jackson Co 35.85 4.13 3.18 Johnston Co 131.26 27.54 11.23 Jones Co 16.28 1.83 1.50 Lee Co 44.31 4.53 4.19 Lenoir Co 52.16 5.06 4.96 Lincoln Co 40.85 4.19 3.69 Mc Dowell Co 47.19 10.22 4.03 Macon Co 26.13 2.85 2.35 Madison Co 15.11 1.64 1.35 Martin Co 26.79 2.83 2.48 Mecklenburg Co 392.69 73.30 38.40 Mitchell Co 11.18 1.14 1.02 Montgomery Co 29.30 3.61 2.59 Moore Co 61.28 6.19 5.59 Nash Co 104.62 17.95 9.32 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 59 March 31, 2004 County CO NOx VOC New Hanover Co 87.27 9.11 8.50 Northampton Co 28.88 5.33 2.48 Onslow Co 80.37 8.05 7.73 Orange Co 62.77 18.46 5.55 Pamlico Co 10.44 0.97 0.94 Pasquotank Co 20.29 2.00 1.98 Pender Co 47.14 8.32 4.10 Perquimans Co 10.17 1.13 0.94 Person Co 24.33 2.42 2.22 Pitt Co 91.52 8.97 8.59 Polk Co 21.35 4.74 1.83 Randolph Co 122.08 17.26 10.75 Richmond Co 39.91 4.17 3.80 Robeson Co 127.44 22.67 11.10 Rockingham Co 77.73 7.94 7.21 Rowan Co 102.00 17.76 9.08 Rutherford Co 49.44 5.02 4.50 Sampson Co 61.77 8.73 5.44 Scotland Co 34.46 3.59 3.21 Stanly Co 42.33 4.14 3.95 Stokes Co 28.49 2.87 2.57 Surry Co 78.33 12.38 6.98 Swain Co 16.94 1.88 1.50 Transylvania Co 23.80 2.44 2.13 Tyrrell Co 4.24 0.48 0.39 Union Co 54.05 7.20 5.23 Vance Co 38.11 6.67 3.34 Wake Co 306.80 57.16 27.42 Warren Co 17.90 3.68 1.54 Washington Co 13.77 1.55 1.27 Watauga Co 33.04 3.63 3.10 Wayne Co 81.79 7.98 7.66 Wilkes Co 56.78 5.89 5.12 Wilson Co 71.21 10.72 6.54 Yadkin Co 39.27 7.03 3.44 Yancey Co 13.30 1.48 1.22 State Total 6138.89 924.70 559.38 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 60 March 31, 2004 APPENDIX B Conversion of MOBILE5 Registration Fractions to MOBILE6 Based Registration Fractions Mecklenburg County * Convert MOBILE5 Registration Fractions to MOBILE6 Based Registration Fractions * * Calendar Year: 1996.000User Input * * MOBILE5b Reg Fractions * 0.114 0.097 0.086 0.083 0.077 0.084 0.069 0.062 0.051 0.044 * 0.040 0.039 0.033 0.027 0.022 0.016 0.012 0.007 0.004 0.003 * 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.018 * 0.090 0.080 0.076 0.075 0.062 0.066 0.066 0.048 0.040 0.037 * 0.034 0.042 0.040 0.035 0.033 0.024 0.021 0.013 0.009 0.008 * 0.008 0.012 0.012 0.009 0.060 * 0.123 0.148 0.096 0.088 0.065 0.071 0.054 0.039 0.023 0.021 * 0.030 0.034 0.031 0.021 0.021 0.020 0.013 0.008 0.007 0.006 * 0.007 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.042 * 0.123 0.104 0.061 0.093 0.060 0.077 0.058 0.046 0.025 0.023 * 0.023 0.030 0.047 0.027 0.025 0.023 0.018 0.008 0.008 0.009 * 0.009 0.014 0.011 0.009 0.069 * 0.114 0.097 0.086 0.083 0.077 0.084 0.069 0.062 0.051 0.044 * 0.040 0.039 0.033 0.027 0.022 0.016 0.012 0.007 0.004 0.003 * 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.018 * 0.090 0.080 0.076 0.075 0.062 0.066 0.066 0.048 0.040 0.037 * 0.034 0.042 0.040 0.035 0.033 0.024 0.021 0.013 0.009 0.008 * 0.008 0.012 0.012 0.009 0.060 * 0.155 0.141 0.081 0.100 0.066 0.083 0.056 0.041 0.030 0.032 * 0.055 0.048 0.027 0.028 0.016 0.014 0.008 0.004 0.003 0.002 * 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.002 * 0.141 0.111 0.088 0.081 0.074 0.061 0.049 0.035 0.027 0.017 * 0.015 0.301 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * * * MOBILE6 Vehicle Classes: * 1 LDV Light Duty Vehicles ( Passenger Cars) * 2 LDT1 Light Duty Trucks 1 ( 0 6,000 lbs. GVWR, 0 3750 lbs. LVW) * 3 LDT2 Light Duty Trucks 2 ( 0 6,000 lbs. GVWR, 3751 5750 lbs. LVW) * 4 LDT3 Light Duty Trucks 3 ( 6,001 8500 lbs. GVWR, 0 3750 lbs. LVW) * 5 LDT4 Light Duty Trucks 4 ( 6,001 8500 lbs. GVWR, 3751 5750 lbs. LVW) * 6 HDV2B Class 2b Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 8501 10,000 lbs. GVWR) * 7 HDV3 Class 3 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 10,001 14,000 lbs. GVWR) Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 61 March 31, 2004 * 8 HDV4 Class 4 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 14,001 16,000 lbs. GVWR) * 9 HDV5 Class 5 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 16,001 19,500 lbs. GVWR) * 10 HDV6 Class 6 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 19,501 26,000 lbs. GVWR) * 11 HDV7 Class 7 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 26,001 33,000 lbs. GVWR) * 12 HDV8A Class 8a Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 33,001 60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 13 HDV8B Class 8b Heavy Duty Vehicles (> 60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 14 HDBS School Busses * 15 HDBT Transit and Urban Busses * 16 MC Motorcycles ( All) * REG DIST * RESULTING MOBILE6 BASED REGISTRATION FRACTIONS * * MOBILE6 REGISTRATION FRACTIONS BY VEHICLE CLASS AND AGE * LDV M5 LDGV 1 0.114 0.097 0.086 0.083 0.077 0.084 0.069 0.062 0.051 0.044 0.040 0.039 0.033 0.027 0.022 0.016 0.012 0.007 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.018 * LDT1 M5 LDGT1 2 0.090 0.080 0.076 0.075 0.062 0.066 0.066 0.048 0.040 0.037 0.034 0.042 0.040 0.035 0.033 0.024 0.021 0.013 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.012 0.012 0.009 0.060 * LDT2 M5 LDGT1 3 0.090 0.080 0.076 0.075 0.062 0.066 0.066 0.048 0.040 0.037 0.034 0.042 0.040 0.035 0.033 0.024 0.021 0.013 0.009 0.008 0.008 0.012 0.012 0.009 0.060 * LDT3 M5 LDGT2 4 0.123 0.148 0.096 0.088 0.065 0.071 0.054 0.039 0.023 0.021 0.030 0.034 0.031 0.021 0.021 0.020 0.013 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.042 * LDT4 M5 LDGT2 5 0.123 0.148 0.096 0.088 0.065 0.071 0.054 0.039 0.023 0.021 0.030 0.034 0.031 0.021 0.021 0.020 0.013 0.008 0.007 0.006 0.007 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.042 * HDV2B M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 6 0.137 0.120 0.070 0.096 0.063 0.080 0.057 0.044 0.027 0.027 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.027 0.021 0.019 0.013 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.040 * HDV3 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 7 0.137 0.120 0.070 0.096 0.063 0.080 0.057 0.044 0.027 0.027 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.027 0.021 0.019 0.013 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.040 * HDV4 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 8 0.137 0.120 0.070 0.096 0.063 0.080 0.057 0.044 0.027 0.027 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.027 0.021 0.019 0.013 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.040 * HDV5 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 9 0.137 0.120 0.070 0.096 0.063 0.080 0.057 0.044 0.027 0.027 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.027 0.021 0.019 0.013 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.040 * HDV6 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 62 March 31, 2004 10 0.137 0.120 0.070 0.096 0.063 0.080 0.057 0.044 0.027 0.027 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.027 0.021 0.019 0.013 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.040 * HDV7 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 11 0.137 0.120 0.070 0.096 0.063 0.080 0.057 0.044 0.027 0.027 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.027 0.021 0.019 0.013 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.040 * HDV8a M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 12 0.137 0.120 0.070 0.096 0.063 0.080 0.057 0.044 0.027 0.027 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.027 0.021 0.019 0.013 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.040 * HDV8b M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 13 0.137 0.120 0.070 0.096 0.063 0.080 0.057 0.044 0.027 0.027 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.027 0.021 0.019 0.013 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.040 * HDBS M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 14 0.137 0.120 0.070 0.096 0.063 0.080 0.057 0.044 0.027 0.027 0.037 0.038 0.039 0.027 0.021 0.019 0.013 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.040 * HDBT M5 HDDVs 15 0.155 0.141 0.081 0.100 0.066 0.083 0.056 0.041 0.030 0.032 0.055 0.048 0.027 0.028 0.016 0.014 0.008 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.002 0.001 0.002 * Motorcycles M5 MC 16 0.141 0.111 0.088 0.081 0.074 0.061 0.049 0.035 0.027 0.017 0.015 0.301 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Triad * Convert MOBILE5 Registration Fractions to MOBILE6 Based Registration Fractions * * Calendar Year: 1996.000User Input * * MOBILE5b Reg Fractions * 0.101 0.080 0.075 0.073 0.070 0.081 0.066 0.063 0.054 0.048 * 0.045 0.046 0.040 0.034 0.028 0.021 0.016 0.009 0.005 0.004 * 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.024 * 0.077 0.066 0.065 0.066 0.054 0.062 0.067 0.047 0.043 0.037 * 0.034 0.045 0.044 0.039 0.039 0.027 0.025 0.016 0.012 0.010 * 0.010 0.014 0.014 0.012 0.075 * 0.081 0.089 0.078 0.078 0.065 0.080 0.064 0.050 0.033 0.032 * 0.037 0.041 0.038 0.030 0.031 0.029 0.018 0.011 0.009 0.009 * 0.006 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.052 * 0.078 0.079 0.049 0.062 0.058 0.080 0.051 0.041 0.033 0.027 * 0.034 0.043 0.040 0.031 0.038 0.029 0.018 0.013 0.011 0.016 * 0.014 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.104 * 0.101 0.080 0.075 0.073 0.070 0.081 0.066 0.063 0.054 0.048 * 0.045 0.046 0.040 0.034 0.028 0.021 0.016 0.009 0.005 0.004 * 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.024 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 63 March 31, 2004 * 0.077 0.066 0.065 0.066 0.054 0.062 0.067 0.047 0.043 0.037 * 0.034 0.045 0.044 0.039 0.039 0.027 0.025 0.016 0.012 0.010 * 0.010 0.014 0.014 0.012 0.075 * 0.170 0.141 0.087 0.100 0.074 0.079 0.067 0.042 0.032 0.027 * 0.033 0.032 0.029 0.024 0.018 0.014 0.010 0.004 0.004 0.003 * 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.003 * 0.134 0.102 0.072 0.070 0.071 0.051 0.049 0.041 0.027 0.021 * 0.018 0.344 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * * * MOBILE6 Vehicle Classes: * 1 LDV Light Duty Vehicles ( Passenger Cars) * 2 LDT1 Light Duty Trucks 1 ( 0 6,000 lbs. GVWR, 0 3750 lbs. LVW) * 3 LDT2 Light Duty Trucks 2 ( 0 6,000 lbs. GVWR, 3751 5750 lbs. LVW) * 4 LDT3 Light Duty Trucks 3 ( 6,001 8500 lbs. GVWR, 0 3750 lbs. LVW) * 5 LDT4 Light Duty Trucks 4 ( 6,001 8500 lbs. GVWR, 3751 5750 lbs. LVW) * 6 HDV2B Class 2b Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 8501 10,000 lbs. GVWR) * 7 HDV3 Class 3 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 10,001 14,000 lbs. GVWR) * 8 HDV4 Class 4 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 14,001 16,000 lbs. GVWR) * 9 HDV5 Class 5 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 16,001 19,500 lbs. GVWR) * 10 HDV6 Class 6 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 19,501 26,000 lbs. GVWR) * 11 HDV7 Class 7 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 26,001 33,000 lbs. GVWR) * 12 HDV8A Class 8a Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 33,001 60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 13 HDV8B Class 8b Heavy Duty Vehicles (> 60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 14 HDBS School Busses * 15 HDBT Transit and Urban Busses * 16 MC Motorcycles ( All) * REG DIST * RESULTING MOBILE6 BASED REGISTRATION FRACTIONS * * MOBILE6 REGISTRATION FRACTIONS BY VEHICLE CLASS AND AGE * LDV M5 LDGV 1 0.101 0.080 0.075 0.073 0.070 0.081 0.066 0.063 0.054 0.048 0.045 0.046 0.040 0.034 0.028 0.021 0.016 0.009 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.024 * LDT1 M5 LDGT1 2 0.077 0.066 0.065 0.066 0.054 0.062 0.067 0.047 0.043 0.037 0.034 0.045 0.044 0.039 0.039 0.027 0.025 0.016 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.014 0.014 0.012 0.075 * LDT2 M5 LDGT1 3 0.077 0.066 0.065 0.066 0.054 0.062 0.067 0.047 0.043 0.037 0.034 0.045 0.044 0.039 0.039 0.027 0.025 0.016 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.014 0.014 0.012 0.075 * LDT3 M5 LDGT2 4 0.081 0.089 0.078 0.078 0.065 0.080 0.064 0.050 0.033 0.032 0.037 0.041 0.038 0.030 0.031 0.029 0.018 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.006 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.052 * LDT4 M5 LDGT2 5 0.081 0.089 0.078 0.078 0.065 0.080 0.064 0.050 0.033 0.032 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 64 March 31, 2004 0.037 0.041 0.038 0.030 0.031 0.029 0.018 0.011 0.009 0.009 0.006 0.014 0.013 0.012 0.052 * HDV2B M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 6 0.118 0.106 0.065 0.079 0.065 0.079 0.058 0.042 0.032 0.027 0.033 0.038 0.035 0.028 0.029 0.022 0.015 0.009 0.008 0.010 0.009 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.060 * HDV3 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 7 0.118 0.106 0.065 0.079 0.065 0.079 0.058 0.042 0.032 0.027 0.033 0.038 0.035 0.028 0.029 0.022 0.015 0.009 0.008 0.010 0.009 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.060 * HDV4 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 8 0.118 0.106 0.065 0.079 0.065 0.079 0.058 0.042 0.032 0.027 0.033 0.038 0.035 0.028 0.029 0.022 0.015 0.009 0.008 0.010 0.009 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.060 * HDV5 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 9 0.118 0.106 0.065 0.079 0.065 0.079 0.058 0.042 0.032 0.027 0.033 0.038 0.035 0.028 0.029 0.022 0.015 0.009 0.008 0.010 0.009 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.060 * HDV6 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 10 0.118 0.106 0.065 0.079 0.065 0.079 0.058 0.042 0.032 0.027 0.033 0.038 0.035 0.028 0.029 0.022 0.015 0.009 0.008 0.010 0.009 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.060 * HDV7 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 11 0.118 0.106 0.065 0.079 0.065 0.079 0.058 0.042 0.032 0.027 0.033 0.038 0.035 0.028 0.029 0.022 0.015 0.009 0.008 0.010 0.009 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.060 * HDV8a M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 12 0.118 0.106 0.065 0.079 0.065 0.079 0.058 0.042 0.032 0.027 0.033 0.038 0.035 0.028 0.029 0.022 0.015 0.009 0.008 0.010 0.009 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.060 * HDV8b M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 13 0.118 0.106 0.065 0.079 0.065 0.079 0.058 0.042 0.032 0.027 0.033 0.038 0.035 0.028 0.029 0.022 0.015 0.009 0.008 0.010 0.009 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.060 * HDBS M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 14 0.118 0.106 0.065 0.079 0.065 0.079 0.058 0.042 0.032 0.027 0.033 0.038 0.035 0.028 0.029 0.022 0.015 0.009 0.008 0.010 0.009 0.012 0.010 0.009 0.060 * HDBT M5 HDDVs 15 0.170 0.141 0.087 0.100 0.074 0.079 0.067 0.042 0.032 0.027 0.033 0.032 0.029 0.024 0.018 0.014 0.010 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.003 * Motorcycles M5 MC 16 0.134 0.102 0.072 0.070 0.071 0.051 0.049 0.041 0.027 0.021 0.018 0.344 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Wake County * Convert MOBILE5 Registration Fractions to MOBILE6 Based Registration Fractions * * Calendar Year: 1996.000User Input Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 65 March 31, 2004 * * MOBILE5b Reg Fractions * 0.114 0.091 0.085 0.080 0.075 0.083 0.069 0.063 0.052 0.047 * 0.042 0.040 0.034 0.029 0.023 0.017 0.012 0.007 0.004 0.003 * 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.019 * 0.090 0.081 0.080 0.083 0.060 0.066 0.069 0.049 0.037 0.037 * 0.034 0.041 0.039 0.034 0.037 0.025 0.021 0.013 0.009 0.008 * 0.006 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.051 * 0.101 0.117 0.083 0.095 0.057 0.121 0.069 0.048 0.034 0.034 * 0.025 0.037 0.032 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.010 0.007 0.004 0.005 * 0.006 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.036 * 0.109 0.076 0.057 0.088 0.069 0.088 0.049 0.041 0.041 0.030 * 0.036 0.039 0.035 0.027 0.028 0.026 0.016 0.009 0.007 0.009 * 0.010 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.074 * 0.114 0.091 0.085 0.080 0.075 0.083 0.069 0.063 0.052 0.047 * 0.042 0.040 0.034 0.029 0.023 0.017 0.012 0.007 0.004 0.003 * 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.019 * 0.090 0.081 0.080 0.083 0.060 0.066 0.069 0.049 0.037 0.037 * 0.034 0.041 0.039 0.034 0.037 0.025 0.021 0.013 0.009 0.008 * 0.006 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.051 * 0.163 0.137 0.087 0.103 0.067 0.074 0.044 0.035 0.032 0.054 * 0.040 0.044 0.029 0.026 0.018 0.016 0.010 0.004 0.004 0.003 * 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.004 * 0.138 0.105 0.080 0.070 0.068 0.053 0.053 0.041 0.029 0.021 * 0.022 0.320 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * * * MOBILE6 Vehicle Classes: * 1 LDV Light Duty Vehicles ( Passenger Cars) * 2 LDT1 Light Duty Trucks 1 ( 0 6,000 lbs. GVWR, 0 3750 lbs. LVW) * 3 LDT2 Light Duty Trucks 2 ( 0 6,000 lbs. GVWR, 3751 5750 lbs. LVW) * 4 LDT3 Light Duty Trucks 3 ( 6,001 8500 lbs. GVWR, 0 3750 lbs. LVW) * 5 LDT4 Light Duty Trucks 4 ( 6,001 8500 lbs. GVWR, 3751 5750 lbs. LVW) * 6 HDV2B Class 2b Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 8501 10,000 lbs. GVWR) * 7 HDV3 Class 3 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 10,001 14,000 lbs. GVWR) * 8 HDV4 Class 4 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 14,001 16,000 lbs. GVWR) * 9 HDV5 Class 5 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 16,001 19,500 lbs. GVWR) * 10 HDV6 Class 6 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 19,501 26,000 lbs. GVWR) * 11 HDV7 Class 7 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 26,001 33,000 lbs. GVWR) * 12 HDV8A Class 8a Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 33,001 60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 13 HDV8B Class 8b Heavy Duty Vehicles (> 60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 14 HDBS School Busses * 15 HDBT Transit and Urban Busses * 16 MC Motorcycles ( All) * REG DIST * RESULTING MOBILE6 BASED REGISTRATION FRACTIONS * * MOBILE6 REGISTRATION FRACTIONS BY VEHICLE CLASS AND AGE * LDV M5 LDGV Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 66 March 31, 2004 1 0.114 0.091 0.085 0.080 0.075 0.083 0.069 0.063 0.052 0.047 0.042 0.040 0.034 0.029 0.023 0.017 0.012 0.007 0.004 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.003 0.002 0.019 * LDT1 M5 LDGT1 2 0.090 0.081 0.080 0.083 0.060 0.066 0.069 0.049 0.037 0.037 0.034 0.041 0.039 0.034 0.037 0.025 0.021 0.013 0.009 0.008 0.006 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.051 * LDT2 M5 LDGT1 3 0.090 0.081 0.080 0.083 0.060 0.066 0.069 0.049 0.037 0.037 0.034 0.041 0.039 0.034 0.037 0.025 0.021 0.013 0.009 0.008 0.006 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.051 * LDT3 M5 LDGT2 4 0.101 0.117 0.083 0.095 0.057 0.121 0.069 0.048 0.034 0.034 0.025 0.037 0.032 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.010 0.007 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.036 * LDT4 M5 LDGT2 5 0.101 0.117 0.083 0.095 0.057 0.121 0.069 0.048 0.034 0.034 0.025 0.037 0.032 0.019 0.018 0.017 0.010 0.007 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.010 0.008 0.007 0.036 * HDV2B M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 6 0.133 0.102 0.070 0.095 0.068 0.082 0.047 0.039 0.037 0.040 0.038 0.041 0.032 0.027 0.023 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.043 * HDV3 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 7 0.133 0.102 0.070 0.095 0.068 0.082 0.047 0.039 0.037 0.040 0.038 0.041 0.032 0.027 0.023 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.043 * HDV4 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 8 0.133 0.102 0.070 0.095 0.068 0.082 0.047 0.039 0.037 0.040 0.038 0.041 0.032 0.027 0.023 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.043 * HDV5 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 9 0.133 0.102 0.070 0.095 0.068 0.082 0.047 0.039 0.037 0.040 0.038 0.041 0.032 0.027 0.023 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.043 * HDV6 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 10 0.133 0.102 0.070 0.095 0.068 0.082 0.047 0.039 0.037 0.040 0.038 0.041 0.032 0.027 0.023 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.043 * HDV7 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 11 0.133 0.102 0.070 0.095 0.068 0.082 0.047 0.039 0.037 0.040 0.038 0.041 0.032 0.027 0.023 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.043 * HDV8a M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 12 0.133 0.102 0.070 0.095 0.068 0.082 0.047 0.039 0.037 0.040 0.038 0.041 0.032 0.027 0.023 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.043 * HDV8b M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 13 0.133 0.102 0.070 0.095 0.068 0.082 0.047 0.039 0.037 0.040 0.038 0.041 0.032 0.027 0.023 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.006 0.006 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 67 March 31, 2004 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.043 * HDBS M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 14 0.133 0.102 0.070 0.095 0.068 0.082 0.047 0.039 0.037 0.040 0.038 0.041 0.032 0.027 0.023 0.022 0.014 0.007 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.009 0.007 0.006 0.043 * HDBT M5 HDDVs 15 0.163 0.137 0.087 0.103 0.067 0.074 0.044 0.035 0.032 0.054 0.040 0.044 0.029 0.026 0.018 0.016 0.010 0.004 0.004 0.003 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.001 0.004 * Motorcycles M5 MC 16 0.138 0.105 0.080 0.070 0.068 0.053 0.053 0.041 0.029 0.021 0.022 0.320 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 North Carolina REG DIST * Convert MOBILE5 Registration Fractions to MOBILE6 Based Registration Fractions * * Calendar Year: 1995.000User Input * * MOBILE5b Reg Fractions * 0.064 0.057 0.066 0.063 0.067 0.065 0.074 0.064 0.061 0.052 * 0.048 0.046 0.049 0.044 0.037 0.031 0.025 0.019 0.011 0.006 * 0.005 0.005 0.007 0.006 0.028 * 0.060 0.052 0.056 0.055 0.060 0.049 0.054 0.059 0.045 0.038 * 0.036 0.035 0.045 0.046 0.042 0.043 0.033 0.031 0.021 0.014 * 0.013 0.011 0.018 0.017 0.067 * 0.245 0.038 0.057 0.040 0.046 0.028 0.059 0.034 0.023 0.016 * 0.017 0.012 0.018 0.016 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.005 0.004 0.002 * 0.002 0.003 0.005 0.004 0.300 * 0.118 0.032 0.027 0.020 0.031 0.024 0.031 0.017 0.015 0.015 * 0.011 0.013 0.014 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.009 0.006 0.003 0.003 * 0.003 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.563 * 0.064 0.057 0.066 0.063 0.067 0.065 0.074 0.064 0.061 0.052 * 0.048 0.046 0.049 0.044 0.037 0.031 0.025 0.019 0.011 0.006 * 0.005 0.005 0.007 0.006 0.028 * 0.060 0.052 0.056 0.055 0.060 0.049 0.054 0.059 0.045 0.038 * 0.036 0.035 0.045 0.046 0.042 0.043 0.033 0.031 0.021 0.014 * 0.013 0.011 0.018 0.017 0.067 * 0.115 0.095 0.110 0.060 0.083 0.057 0.067 0.052 0.040 0.029 * 0.029 0.041 0.041 0.040 0.034 0.024 0.023 0.018 0.007 0.007 * 0.006 0.005 0.006 0.003 0.008 * 0.223 0.028 0.024 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.012 0.012 0.009 0.007 * 0.005 0.630 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 * * * MOBILE6 Vehicle Classes: Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 68 March 31, 2004 * 1 LDV Light Duty Vehicles ( Passenger Cars) * 2 LDT1 Light Duty Trucks 1 ( 0 6,000 lbs. GVWR, 0 3750 lbs. LVW) * 3 LDT2 Light Duty Trucks 2 ( 0 6,000 lbs. GVWR, 3751 5750 lbs. LVW) * 4 LDT3 Light Duty Trucks 3 ( 6,001 8500 lbs. GVWR, 0 3750 lbs. LVW) * 5 LDT4 Light Duty Trucks 4 ( 6,001 8500 lbs. GVWR, 3751 5750 lbs. LVW) * 6 HDV2B Class 2b Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 8501 10,000 lbs. GVWR) * 7 HDV3 Class 3 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 10,001 14,000 lbs. GVWR) * 8 HDV4 Class 4 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 14,001 16,000 lbs. GVWR) * 9 HDV5 Class 5 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 16,001 19,500 lbs. GVWR) * 10 HDV6 Class 6 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 19,501 26,000 lbs. GVWR) * 11 HDV7 Class 7 Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 26,001 33,000 lbs. GVWR) * 12 HDV8A Class 8a Heavy Duty Vehicles ( 33,001 60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 13 HDV8B Class 8b Heavy Duty Vehicles (> 60,000 lbs. GVWR) * 14 HDBS School Busses * 15 HDBT Transit and Urban Busses * 16 MC Motorcycles ( All) * * RESULTING MOBILE6 BASED REGISTRATION FRACTIONS * * MOBILE6 REGISTRATION FRACTIONS BY VEHICLE CLASS AND AGE * LDV M5 LDGV 1 0.064 0.057 0.066 0.063 0.067 0.065 0.074 0.064 0.061 0.052 0.048 0.046 0.049 0.044 0.037 0.031 0.025 0.019 0.011 0.006 0.005 0.005 0.007 0.006 0.028 * LDT1 M5 LDGT1 2 0.060 0.052 0.056 0.055 0.060 0.049 0.054 0.059 0.045 0.038 0.036 0.035 0.045 0.046 0.042 0.043 0.033 0.031 0.021 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.018 0.017 0.067 * LDT2 M5 LDGT1 3 0.060 0.052 0.056 0.055 0.060 0.049 0.054 0.059 0.045 0.038 0.036 0.035 0.045 0.046 0.042 0.043 0.033 0.031 0.021 0.014 0.013 0.011 0.018 0.017 0.067 * LDT3 M5 LDGT2 4 0.245 0.038 0.057 0.040 0.046 0.028 0.059 0.034 0.023 0.016 0.017 0.012 0.018 0.016 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.005 0.004 0.300 * LDT4 M5 LDGT2 5 0.245 0.038 0.057 0.040 0.046 0.028 0.059 0.034 0.023 0.016 0.017 0.012 0.018 0.016 0.009 0.009 0.008 0.005 0.004 0.002 0.002 0.003 0.005 0.004 0.300 * HDV2B M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 6 0.117 0.059 0.062 0.037 0.053 0.038 0.046 0.032 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.327 * HDV3 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 7 0.117 0.059 0.062 0.037 0.053 0.038 0.046 0.032 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.327 * HDV4 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 8 0.117 0.059 0.062 0.037 0.053 0.038 0.046 0.032 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.005 0.005 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix B Page 69 March 31, 2004 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.327 * HDV5 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 9 0.117 0.059 0.062 0.037 0.053 0.038 0.046 0.032 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.327 * HDV6 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 10 0.117 0.059 0.062 0.037 0.053 0.038 0.046 0.032 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.327 * HDV7 M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 11 0.117 0.059 0.062 0.037 0.053 0.038 0.046 0.032 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.327 * HDV8a M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 12 0.117 0.059 0.062 0.037 0.053 0.038 0.046 0.032 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.327 * HDV8b M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 13 0.117 0.059 0.062 0.037 0.053 0.038 0.046 0.032 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.327 * HDBS M5 HDVs ( Combined HDGV and HDDV) 14 0.117 0.059 0.062 0.037 0.053 0.038 0.046 0.032 0.025 0.021 0.018 0.025 0.025 0.024 0.020 0.016 0.015 0.011 0.005 0.005 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.004 0.327 * HDBT M5 HDDVs 15 0.115 0.095 0.110 0.060 0.083 0.057 0.067 0.052 0.040 0.029 0.029 0.041 0.041 0.040 0.034 0.024 0.023 0.018 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.006 0.003 0.008 * Motorcycles M5 MC 16 0.223 0.028 0.024 0.018 0.016 0.016 0.012 0.012 0.009 0.007 0.005 0.630 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Triad Early Action Compact Ozone Action Plan Appendix C Page 1 March 31, 2004 APPENDIX C TRIAD EARLY ACTION PLAN STRATEGIES AND CONTROL MEASURES Assumptions/ Explanation NOx Reduction Tons/ Yr for 2007 VOC Reduction Tons/ Yr for 2007 Geographic Area Implementation Date l, Vehicles and Equipment 78.84 State vehicles per county 33.3 VMT/ day 14 vehicles per county per year turnover.

Source: 1999 NC Senate Bill 953 Calculation Method: CACPS No estimates yet on local vehicles EAC will design an on line database and reporting system to account for local government vehicle replacements. This will be used to calculate emissions reductions due to retirement of old vehicles and replacement with lower emissions vehicles. 0.9 1.1 11 County region Beginning January 2004.

Purchase equipment with new engine technology being introduced in 2001

2005 ( Tier 2) and 2006  2008 ( Tier 3).

State mandated measure N/ A State mandated measure N/ A State mandated measure Same as above Same as above Purchase vehicles with new engine technology scheduled for introduction in 2004 and 2007. N/ A State mandated measure N/ A State mandated measure Same as above Same as above Purchase new equipment that meets California standards. N/ A State mandated measure N/ A State mandated measure Same as above Same as above Between November 2002 and the Spring of 2003 Greensboro converted all diesel vehicles, on and off road, to biodiesel. The city now uses close to 1.5 million gallons annually of biodiesel. Reductions are:

 30% total unburned hydrocarbons  20% carbon monoxide  22% particulate matter + 2% NOx  20% sulfates  13% PAH  50% nPAH arge Public Construction Projects Local implementation will depend on State DOT taking the initiative for major highway projects. State DOT staff is developing a proposal for contract requirements and/ or incentives for heavy equipment emissions reductions to submit to the State Board of Transportation. Quantification not possible at this time Quantification not possible at this time 11 county region Include only if we think it will be implemented by state DOT ransportation Newly authorized funding provided about $ 2.5 million in 2003. In addition,

PART secured nearly $ 7 million in sate and federal funds. 9000 current VMT 50% increase per year Source: PART Calculation Method: CACPS ( The regional bus service travels from downtown transit centers in Greensboro, Winston Salem and High Point to the PART regional transfer facility. There, shuttles travel to business and hotels in the airport area and to the airport itself. In 2003 PART Express averaged 10,000 monthly one way passenger trips, yielding a 350,000 mile monthly reduction in miles traveled on the region's road network. counties 15 VMT/ trip 10% increase / 5 years Source: PART and NCDOT Calculation Method: DOT Spreadsheet PART has funds on hand to build 20 park and ride lots. Plans are underway for construction of several lots in Greensboro, Winston Salem and High Point.

Others will be built in surrounding counties, contingent upon 10% local match. 3.2 1.6 Urban core area first   Guilford and Forsyth and Alamance counties. Minimum of 5 built or leased in core urban area 2004. Additional lots to be built or leased in 3 outlying counties 2004.

gle Occupancy Vehicles 20 vans currently Add 5 vans per year 12 persons / van 30 VMT / person / day Source: PART Calculation Method: CACPS Program has served commuters in region for 10 years. 0.7 0.7 Guilford and Forsyth counties Beginning January 2004 Conservative assumption based on 5.73% carpool population 30 VMT / person / day 1% increase per year based on current trend Source: 2000 Census Calculation Method: CACPS 19 23.2 Same Beginning January 2004 PART is partnering with NC A& T University and UNC Chapel Hill on accessibility and engineering feasibility of this incentive for using multiple occupancy vehicles . Project is funded by US DOT. N/ A Alamance,

Guilford,

Forsyth counties Feasibility study is ongoing as of 3/ 31/ 04 PART is in Phase II of a Mobility Major Investment Study. It has produced feasibility data on 2 groups of rapid transit technologies for the region, bus and rail. The PART Board will determine whether to begin with bus or to move directly into planning for inter city rail. 4 potential corridors have been studied and a priority East West Corridor has been chosen. Implementation will be based on land use policies of activity centers, village centers and infill in designated centers along the corridor.

ortation Measures N/ A Quantifications included in A6 and A7 Quantifications included in A6 and A7 Same Late 2004.

N/ A Quantifications included Quantifications Same Depends on due to manufacturing job losses.

N/ A Quantifications included in A6 and A7 Quantifications included in A6 and A7 Already implemented by Greensboro for city employees DUSTRIES & UTILITIES: Reduce Emissions from Boilers Duke Power communicated to DAQ its likely NOx emissions rate for Belews Creek

R. J. Reynolds communicated to DAQ its likely ozone season NOx emissions rate for Tobaccoville site ( including boilers) on 10/ 6/ 03. This recommendation improves the accuracy of the Division of Air Quality ( DAQ) model. While we believe the likely emissions are less than DAQ's default projection,

this recommendation does not include an enforceable emission reduction. 11 county region Immediate No one anticipates that any of the closed businesses will re open.

List of closed facilities transmitted to DAQ on 11/ 5/ 03 Of closed facilities in the Triad, RJRT Bailey Plant, downtown Winston Salem, had the highest emissions.. The boilers were retired in 1997. Since the modeling is based on the 1995 inventory, these boilers should be removed. Projected 2007 NOx emissions are 1.33 tons per day.

Several other Triad facilities have closed.

Their closures should be accounted for in the model by updating growth factors for the respective industry sectors. Forsyth County More information available by March 2004.

Ozone Season NOx Emissions   RJRT Tobaccoville NOx SIP seasonal tons 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Boiler 1 194 243 64 64 64 Boiler 2 218 273 64 64 64 Boiler 3 178 223 64 64 64 Boiler 4 190 238 64 64 64 Total 780 977 256 256 256 Days per season 122 153 153 153 153 Forsyth County Emission reduction will take place before the 2004 ozone season. Max. emissions gas boilers 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Reductions tons per day 5.44 5.44 0.72 0.72 0.72 DUSTRIES & UTILITIES: Reduce Emissions at Specific Business and Industry Sites ( Boiler and non boiler)

Not available at this time.

Reductions will not be significant but do support the overall direction of EAC strategies. Guilford County Completed between 2001 and 2003 Not available at this time.

Reductions will not be significant but do support the overall direction of EAC strategies. Randolph County # 1,2,4 complete # 3 To be implemented June 2004 1308 pounds of NOx per ozone season. ( 56 routes eliminated@ 90 miles per day) NOx emissions per vehicle: 1.1grams per mile ( per DAQ estimate for Forsyth County for 2003 based on MOBILE6 2) Ozone Season May 1

September 30 = 153 days. Week days= 153 x 5/ 7 = 109 days. NOx reduced = 12 pounds per day x 109 days = 1308 pounds 11 counties Completed Estimate 133 diesel truck engines and 483 gasoline truck engines reduce 30 minutes per day of idling.

Reduced idling is assumed to produce an overall benefit in the form 11 counties Summer 2004 quantified based on available information at this time. DAQ does not have any reliable emissions factor but does recommend idling reduction as directionally correct with ozone attainment planning. Guilford and Forsyth counties To be determined lations Statewide rule to prohibit open burning on code red and code orange days will go into effect for 2004 ozone season. NC Division of Air Quality is developing data on estimated NOx and PM2.5 emissions from open burning. 11 counties EACs and DAQ begin cooperating on open burning outreach Feb.

2004 Nonquantifiable 11 counties Ongoing Fist joint venture is an AFV road show to be conducted in Greensboro and Winston Salem on April 21, 2004. Programming and outreach provided by Triangle Clean Cities program, City of Greensboro and City of Winston

Salem. Nonquantifiable 11 counties 2004, depending upon level of local government interest.

Initiated Pilot Projects 0.128% buses / person 51250 VMT / day 160 school days / year 30% buses eligible Source: Guilford County Schools Annual Report 2003 Calculation Method: EPA Retrofit Calculator Quantifications for regional use only   not for inclusion in SIP Guilford County School System has just been awarded $ 100,000 for retrofits of 50 100 busses. 23 Quantifications for regional use only   not for inclusion in SIP 17 Quantifications for regional use only   not for inclusion in SIP 11 counties,

especially Guilford County 2004 if funds received 0.073 vehicles / person 30.8 VMT / day 38.2% fleet diesel 30% vehicles eligible Source: Forsyth County Fleet Winston Salem Fleet 2003 Mobile Maintenance Plan Calculation Method: EPA Retrofit Calculator Quantifications for regional use only   not for inclusion in SIP 10 Quantifications for regional use only   not for inclusion in SIP 7.0 Quantifications for regional use only   not for inclusion in SIP 11 counties To be determined reduction equipment installed, emissions reductions in the Triad can be quantified.

However, this would be a pilot program and emissions reductions would be small. grant funds.

Guilford County School system has instituted a no idling policy for all school buses. " When the temperature is 50 degrees or higher, upon arrival at school sites while awaiting afternoon boarding, school bus engines will be turned off and not restarted until loading is completed and buses are ready to begin the routes."

ion in the Region Education and outreach programs under leadership of Triad Air Awareness Program located in the offices of the Forsyth County Department of Environmental Affairs Nonquantifiable 11 counties Ozone season 2004 Nonquantifiable Same Same as above Nonquantifiable Same Same as above Nonquantifiable Same Same as above Nonquantifiable Same Same as above.

Nonquantifiable Same Same as above.

ms See news articles # 5 and # 6 in Section 1.5 of Text re: energy savings programs in High Point municipal buildings and Davidson County buildings. A pilot program in the Guilford County schools is being expanded, and the City of Asheboro ( Randolph County) has already completed an energy saving audit with measurable results. Include in 3% reduction allowed for voluntary measures Include in 3%

reduction allowed for voluntary measures 2 counties currently;

others later Completed, as noted above, in public buildings in several counties and school systems. To be implemented in other locations throughout 2004 and 2005. Strategies Implemented in 2003 in City of Thomasville in Davidson County.

Others with telephone and electronic e billpay are being identified.

Assumed to be nonquantifiable Ongoing in several counties Strategies implemented at various levels throughout the region.

Already implemented in Greensboro, Winston Salem and High Point;

incorporated into their long range transportation updates.

Assumed to be nonquantifiable On going in Winston

Salem and Greensboro Implemented at various levels throughout the region Strategies E4   E7 mandated in 1999 NC Senate Bill 953 40 MPH average commute 20% state government employees in Triad eligible to participate Source: 2000 US Census; NC commuting trends Calculation Method: CACPS E4,5,6,7 154.6 E4,5,6,7 188.9 11 counties Implemented at various levels throughout the region N/ A Nonquantifiable Nonquantifiable 11 counties Ongoing inue to Promote Automobile Alternatives Mobility Major Investment Study studied 2 groups of rapid transit technologies bus and rail. PART Board of Directors has not determined whether to begin with bus or rail. 4 corridors were studied and the East West Corridor has been chosen as the priority corridor.

This Study incorporates land use policies of activity centers, village centers and infill in designated centers along the corridor. Significant future impact 11 counties Ongoing 0.89% population participation 30 VMT / day / person ( vehicle mileage removed from circulation)

Source: US Census Calculation Method: CACPS 228.5 279.4 11 counties Ongoing .. 11 counties Future plans rdinated and Pedestrian Friendly Land Use Quantification included in A6, A7, A8, A9, A10 11 counties Ongoing Quantification included in A6 11 counties Ongoing Quantification included in A6 11 counties Ongoing Quantification included in A6 11 counties Ongoing Quantification included in A6 11 counties Ongoing Quantification included in A6 11 counties Ongoing Quantification included in A6 Ongoing Quantification included in A6, A7, A8, A9, A10 Guilford &

Forsyth counties Ongoing Quantification included in E1 11 counties Ongoing Throughout the Region Triad local governments have adopted and are formulating new comprehensive development plans and unified development ordinances that incorporate smart growth principles. Comprehensive plans,

and ordinances that reflect these plans have been adopted in:

Greensboro igh Point Winston Salem/ Forsyth County Randolph County Davie County Lexington Elon Asheboro Franklinville Burlington All of these plans and ordinances provide for street connectivity, more sidewalks, TND, mixed use and infill development, and landscaping Land Use and transportation planning are linked in land use plans and in the 4 MPO multi modal transportation plan updates.

27 local governments have also adopted PART's Land Use and Transportation Principles as a local and regional guide to link land use and transportation planning.

These measures are discussed more fully in the narrative and, by way of example, web site links are provided to 17 ordinances and plans.