[Federal Register: October 30, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 209)]
[Notices]
[Page 56191-56193]
[DOCID:fr30oc09-55]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0817; FRL-8975-8]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Stormwater Management Including Discharges From Newly
Developed and Redeveloped Sites; EPA ICR No. 2366.01, OMB Control No.
2040-NEW.

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to
submit a request for a new Information Collection Request (ICR) to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Before submitting the ICR to OMB
for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects
of the proposed information collection as described below.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or beforeDecember 29, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2009-0817, by one of the following methods:
     www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OW-2009-0817.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Water Docket, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Mail code: 4203M, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0817.
     Hand Delivery: Water Docket, EPA Docket Center, EPA West
Building Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC,
Attention Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0817. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-2009-
0817. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and may be made available online at
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
The www.regulations.gov Web site is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-
mail comment directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov
your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part
of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available
on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends
that you include your name and other contact information in the body of
your comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read
your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional
information

about EPA's public docket visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at
http://www.epa.gov/epahome/dockets.htm.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jan Matuszko, Engineering and Analysis
Division, Office of Water, (4303T), Environmental Protection Agency,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:
202-566-1035; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Jonathan Angier, Water Permits Division,
(4203M), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number: 202-
564-6392; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

How Can I Access the Docket and/or Submit Comments?

    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0817, which is available for online viewing at
www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in the
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA/DC Public Reading Room is open from
8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>,
and the telephone number for the Water Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use www.regulations.gov to obtain a copy of the draft collection of
information, submit or view public comments, access the index listing
of the contents of the docket, and to access those documents in the
public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system,
select ``search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified in this
document.

What Information Is EPA Particularly Interested in?

    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA specifically
solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    (i) Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
to be collected; and
    (iv) minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

What Should I Consider When I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
    1. Explain your views as clearly as possible and provide specific
examples.
    2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
    3. Provide copies of any technical information and/or data you used
that support your views.
    4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at the estimate that you provide.
    5. Offer alternative ways to improve the collection activity.
    6. Make sure to submit your comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
    7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, be sure to identify the docket
ID number assigned to this action in the subject line on the first page
of your response. You may also provide the name, date, and Federal
Register citation.

What Information Collection Activity or ICR Does This Apply to?

Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-2009-0817

    Affected entities: EPA is proposing to distribute three separate
questionnaires focusing on gathering data pertaining to current
stormwater management practices, including those used to control
discharges from newly developed and redeveloped sites. The first
questionnaire (``Industry Questionnaire'') targets establishments that
develop and redevelop sites in the United States. Establishments
receiving this questionnaire are classified by the following eight
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes:
    236115: New Single-Family Housing Construction (except operative
builders);
    236116: New Multifamily Housing Construction (except operative
builders);
    236117: New Housing Operative Builders;
    236210: Industrial Building Construction;
    236220: Commercial and Institutional Building Construction;
    237210: Land Subdivision;
    237310: Highway, Street and Bridge Construction; and
    237990: Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction.
    The second questionnaire (``MS4 Questionnaire'') targets owners or
operators of municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s). This
includes MS4 communities regulated under NPDES stormwater Phase I and
Phase II regulations and other local government entities.
    Lastly, EPA designed the third questionnaire (``States
Questionnaire'') to obtain information from the states and territories.
    Title: Information Collection Request for Stormwater Management
Including Discharges from Newly Developed and Redeveloped Sites.
    ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2366.01, OMB Control No. 2040-NEW.
    ICR status: This ICR is for a new information collection activity.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: As the urban, suburban and exurban human environment
expands, there is an increase in impervious land cover and stormwater
discharges. This increase in impervious land cover on developed sites
reduces or eliminates the natural infiltration of precipitation. The
resulting stormwater flows across roads, rooftops, and other impervious
surfaces, picking up pollutants that are then discharged to our
nation's waters. In addition, the increased volume of stormwater
discharges results in the scouring of rivers and streams, degrading the
physical integrity of aquatic habitats, stream function and overall
water quality.
    In order to make EPA's stormwater program more effective in
protecting our nation's water quality, EPA commissioned the National
Research Council (NRC) to review the Agency's program for controlling
stormwater discharges under the CWA and

recommend any steps the Agency should take. The NRC released its
report, entitled Urban Stormwater Management in the United States,
National Academy of Sciences Press, in October 2008, with
recommendations for EPA on how to strengthen the national stormwater
program (available at http://cfpub.epa.gov/npdes/home.cfm?program_
id=6). The NRC found that the current regulatory approach by EPA under
the CWA is not adequately controlling all sources of stormwater
discharge that are contributing to waterbody impairment. The NRC
recommended that EPA address stormwater discharges from impervious land
cover and promote practices that harvest, infiltrate and
evapotranspirate stormwater to reduce or prevent it from being
discharged, which is critical to reducing the volume and pollutant
loading to our nation's waters.
    In order to protect our nation's water quality, EPA is committing
to move forward with a nationwide rulemaking pursuant to CWA section
402(p), 33 U.S.C. 1342(p), to propose requirements, including design or
performance standards, for stormwater discharges from, at minimum,
newly developed and redeveloped sites. EPA intends to propose
regulatory options that would revise the NPDES regulations and
establish a comprehensive program to address stormwater discharges from
newly developed and redeveloped sites and to take final action no later
than November 2012. As part of this effort, EPA needs to gather data to
assess current practices and regulatory mechanisms; the effectiveness
and feasibility of various control technologies, best management
practices (BMPs), and pollution prevention opportunities and their
associated potential pollutant reductions and costs; and the possible
financial impacts associated with implementing regulations for
stormwater discharges in developed and developing areas. Therefore, EPA
is seeking Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approval for an ICR.
    In order to evaluate current stormwater management practices, the
scope of the current state and local programs, and any EPA regulation
to control these discharges, EPA is proposing several data collection
activities. Because a regulation could impact, among others,
establishments responsible for developing or redeveloping sites, MS4s,
and the states, the ICR announced today is composed of three
questionnaires: an Industry Questionnaire, an MS4 Questionnaire, and a
State Questionnaire.
    EPA is distributing the Industry Questionnaire to collect technical
feasibility, effectiveness, and cost information on various controls,
pollution prevention technologies, and BMPs applied to stormwater
discharges from newly developed and redeveloped sites. Some of these
BMPs include promoting onsite stormwater retention. This information
will be used to assist EPA in evaluating various regulatory options and
determining the site level and nationwide costs for regulating the
pollutant discharges associated with stormwater from newly developed
and redeveloped sites. Additionally, EPA will collect firm level
financial data to assess the economic impact if these controls were the
basis of a regulation.
    The MS4 and State Questionnaires will collect information on the
scope of the current regulatory program and the stormwater management
practices that are currently required for controlling stormwater
discharges. This includes information on site plan review, performance
standards or design criteria, retention practices and associated
financial information. EPA intends to use this information to assess
existing conditions and the impact to MS4s and states that may result
from a regulation.
    EPA intends to submit this information collection request to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval to distribute three
mandatory questionnaires under the authority of Section 308 of the CWA,
33 U.S.C. 1318. All questionnaire recipients will be required to
complete and return the questionnaire to EPA.
    EPA solicits comment on the following items regarding this ICR.
    (1) Are there alternate means of gathering data from the MS4s and/
or States that would obviate the need for a questionnaire?
    (2) Are there other commercial enterprises that should be included
as respondents, as a means of obtaining maintenance and installation
cost information for stormwater controls?
    (3) Are there alternate means of gathering information on general
project design and costs, and the changes in general project design and
costs that could result from implementing national standards for
stormwater discharges from newly developed and redeveloped sites?
    (4) Are there alternate means of distributing the ``Industry
Questionnaire'' in order to get representative information while
causing less burden to the respondents, such as a short questionnaire
that goes out to a larger sample of respondents while a smaller subset
of respondents receives a more detailed questionnaire?
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 53
hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    The ICR provides a detailed explanation of the Agency's estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 2,060.
    Frequency of response: One occasion.
    Estimated total average number of hours for each respondent: 53.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 108,675.
    Estimated total annual costs: $4.07 million. This includes an
estimated burden cost of $4.05 million for labor and $17,150 for
operations and maintenance.

What Is the Next Step in the Process for This ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. At that time, EPA will
issue another Federal Register notice pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB. If you have any
questions about this ICR or the approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Dated: October 26, 2009.
Ephraim S. King,
Director, Office of Science and Technology.
[FR Doc. E9-26169 Filed 10-29-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


cauliflower) 30 80 130 130 190 No Data 38 190 380 No Data Dry Flowables for Groundboom application ( 10) Cotton 2 200 800 800 1100 No Data 230 1200 2300 No Data Table 15: Summery of Short and Intermediate Term Occupational Risk for PCNB Exposure Scenario ( Scenario #) Crop App Rate4 lbai/ A or lb ai/ gal Daily Area Treated A or gals Dermal MOE Inhalation MOE9 Baseline PPE1 PPE2 PPE3 PPE4 PPE5 PPE6 Eng. C Baseline PPE1 PPE4 PPE2 PPE5 PPE3 PPE6 Eng. C Page 49 of 73 Dry Flowables for Groundboom application ( 11) Peanuts 11.59 80 340 340 480 No Data 98 500 980 No Data Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Groundboom application ( 12) Band treatment ( dried beans, succulent beans, lima) 2 80 45 5700 7700 15000 360 1800 3600 5300 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Groundboom application ( 13) Band treatment, soil treatment ( garlic) 20 80 4.5 570 770 1500 36 180 360 530 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Chemigation application ( 14) Ornamental lawn and turf 32.67 5 44 5600 7600 15000 360 1800 3600 5200 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Chemigation application ( 15) Commercial/ industrial lawns 32.67 10 22 2800 3800 7500 180 890 1800 2600 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Chemigation application ( 16) Sod farms 32.67 350 0.63 80 110 210 5.1 26 51 74 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Grounfboom application ( 16a) Sod farms 32.67 80 2.8 350 470 930 22 110 220 320 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Chemigation application ( 17) Golf course turf 32.67 10 22 2800 3800 7500 180 890 1800 2600 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Chemigation application ( 18) Golf course turf ( fairways) 32.67 40 5.5 700 950 1900 45 220 450 650 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for High Pressure HandWand application ( 19) Commercial industrial lawn 0.15 1000 gals 48 6100 8200 16000 390 1900 3900 5600 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Groundboom application ( 20) Cotton 2 200 18 2300 3100 6100 150 730 1500 2100 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Groundboom application ( 21) Garlic 20 80 4.5 570 770 1500 36 180 360 530 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Groundboom application ( 22) Peanuts 10 80 9.1 1100 1500 3100 73 360 730 1100 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Groundboom application ( 23) Potato 25 80 3.6 460 620 1200 29 150 290 420 Table 15: Summery of Short and Intermediate Term Occupational Risk for PCNB Exposure Scenario ( Scenario #) Crop App Rate4 lbai/ A or lb ai/ gal Daily Area Treated A or gals Dermal MOE Inhalation MOE9 Baseline PPE1 PPE2 PPE3 PPE4 PPE5 PPE6 Eng. C Baseline PPE1 PPE4 PPE2 PPE5 PPE3 PPE6 Eng. C Page 50 of 73 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Chemigation application ( 24) Potato 25 350 0.83 100 140 280 6.7 33 67 96 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Aerial application ( 25) Potato 25 350 0.83 100 140 280 6.7 33 67 96 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Groundboom application ( 26) Soil band treatment ( broccoli, Chinese broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

Chinese cabbage,

cauliflower, collards,

kale, mustard) 30 80 3 380 510 1000 24 120 240 350 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for High Pressure HandWand application ( 27) Containerized stock ( broccoli, Chinese broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

Chinese cabbage,

cauliflower, collards,

kale, mustard) 0.02 1000 gals 480 6100 82000 160000 3900 19000 39000 56000 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Airblast application ( 28) Foliar spray ( magnolia tree) 6 20 60 7600 10000 20000 490 2400 4900 7000 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Groundboom application ( 29) Tomato, pepper 7.50 80 12 1500 2100 4100 97 490 970 1400 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Groundboom application ( 30) Southern pine ( seed orchard) 42.50 10 17 2100 2900 5700 140 690 1400 2000 Mixing/ Loading Liquids for Dip tank application ( 31) Ornamental bulb soak and cut flowers 0.02 100 gals 4800 61000 0 820000 1600000 39000 190000 390000 560000 Loading Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 32) Beans 1.50 80 21000 25000 51000 1000000 340 1700 3400 17000 Loading Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 33) Soil band treatment ( broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

cauliflower, collards,

kale, mustard) 30 80 1000 1300 2600 51000 17 86 170 860 Table 15: Summery of Short and Intermediate Term Occupational Risk for PCNB Exposure Scenario ( Scenario #) Crop App Rate4 lbai/ A or lb ai/ gal Daily Area Treated A or gals Dermal MOE Inhalation MOE9 Baseline PPE1 PPE2 PPE3 PPE4 PPE5 PPE6 Eng. C Baseline PPE1 PPE4 PPE2 PPE5 PPE3 PPE6 Eng. C Page 51 of 73 Loading Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 34) Golf course turf ( tees/ greens) 43.56 10 5700 7000 14000 280000 95 470 950 4700 Loading Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 35) Golf course turf ( fairways) 43.56 40 1400 1700 3500 71000 24 120 240 1200 Loading Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 36) Sod farms 43.56 80 720 870 1800 35000 12 59 120 590 Loading Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 37) Cotton 2 200 6300 7600 15000 310000 100 510 1000 5100 Loading Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 38) Pepper 1.35 80 23000 28000 57000 1100000 380 1900 3800 19000 Loading Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 39) Potato 25 80 1300 1500 3100 62000 21 100 210 1000 Wettable Powders for Groundboom application ( 40) beans( lima, snap,

dried) 1.50 80 47 1000 1300 18000 14 68 140 2400 Wettable Powders for Chemigation application ( 41) beans( lima, snap,

dried) 1.50 350 11 240 310 4100 3.1 16 31 560 Wettable Powders for Chemigation application ( 42) soil band treatment ( broccoli, Chinese,

broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

Chinese cabbage,

cauliflower, collards,

kale, mustard) 30 350 0.54 12 15 200 0.16 0.78 1.6 28 Wettable Powders for Groundboom application ( 43) soil band treatment ( broccoli, Chinese,

broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

Chinese cabbage,

cauliflower, collards,

kale, mustard) 30 80 2.4 51 67 890 0.68 3.4 6.8 120 Wettable Powders for Chemigation application ( 44) commercial/ industrial lawns 40.80 10 14 300 400 5300 4 20 40 710 Table 15: Summery of Short and Intermediate Term Occupational Risk for PCNB Exposure Scenario ( Scenario #) Crop App Rate4 lbai/ A or lb ai/ gal Daily Area Treated A or gals Dermal MOE Inhalation MOE9 Baseline PPE1 PPE2 PPE3 PPE4 PPE5 PPE6 Eng. C Baseline PPE1 PPE4 PPE2 PPE5 PPE3 PPE6 Eng. C Page 52 of 73 Wettable Powders for High Pressure HandWand application ( 45) commercial/ industrial lawns 0.50 1000 gals 11 250 320 4300 3.3 16 33 580 Wettable Powders for Groundboom application ( 46) cotton 2 200 14 310 400 5400 4.1 20 41 730 Wettable Powders for Chemigation application ( 47) cotton 2 350 8.1 180 230 3100 2.3 12 23 420 Wettable Powders for Chemigation application ( 48) golf course turf ( tees and greens) 40.80 10 14 300 400 5300 4 20 40 710 Wettable Powders for Chemigation application ( 49) golf course turf ( fairways) 40.80 40 3.5 76 99 1300 0.100 5 1.00 180 Wettable Powders for Chemigation application ( 50) sod farms 40.80 350 0.4 8.7 11 150 0.11 0.57 1.1 20 Wettable Powders for Groundboom application ( 51) sod farms 40.80 80 1.7 38 49 660 0.50 2.5 5 89 Wettable Powders for Groundboom application ( 52) Peanuts 2 80 35 770 1000 13000 10 51 100 1800 Wettable Powders for Chemigation application ( 53) peanuts 2 350 8.1 180 230 3100 2.3 12 23 420 Wettable Powders for Groundboom application ( 54) pepper, tomato 7.50 80 9.5 210 270 3600 2.7 14 27 490 Wettable Powders for Groundboom application ( 55) pine ( seed orchard) 37.50 10 15 330 430 5700 4.3 22 43 780 Applicator Sprays for High Pressure HandWand application ( 56) containerized nursery stock, soil drench ( beans, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

cauliflower) 0.0038 1000 gals 3100 8800 16000 No Data 240 1200 2400 No Data Sprays for High Pressure HandWand application ( 57) commercial/ industrial lawns, residential lawn 0.04 1000 gals 310 880 1600 No Data 24 120 240 No Data Table 15: Summery of Short and Intermediate Term Occupational Risk for PCNB Exposure Scenario ( Scenario #) Crop App Rate4 lbai/ A or lb ai/ gal Daily Area Treated A or gals Dermal MOE Inhalation MOE9 Baseline PPE1 PPE2 PPE3 PPE4 PPE5 PPE6 Eng. C Baseline PPE1 PPE4 PPE2 PPE5 PPE3 PPE6 Eng. C Page 53 of 73 Sprays for High Pressure HandWand application ( 58) ornamentals ( foliar application only) 1.50 1000 gals 7.8 22 39 No Data 0.59 2.9 5.9 No Data Sprays for High Pressure HandWand application ( 59) containerized nursery stock, soil drench ( pepper, tomato) 0.0038 1000 gals 3100 8800 16000 No Data 240 1200 2400 No Data Sprays for Groundboom application ( 60) Soil band treatment ( broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

cauliflower) 30 80 630 630 800 1800 39 190 390 680 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 61) Cotton 2 200 3800 3800 4800 11000 240 1200 2400 4100 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 62) Peanuts 11.59 80 1600 1600 2100 4500 100 500 1000 1800 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 63) Band treatment ( dried beans, succulent beans, lima) 2 80 9400 9400 12000 26000 590 2900 5900 10000 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 64) Band treatment, soil treatment ( garlic) 20 80 940 940 1200 2600 59 290 590 1000 Sprays for High Pressure HandWand application ( 65) commercial industrial lawn 0.15 1000 gals 78 220 390 No Data 5.9 29 59 No Data Sprays for Groundboom application ( 66) Cotton 2 200 3800 3800 4800 11000 240 1200 2400 4100 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 67) Garlic 20 80 940 940 1200 2600 59 290 590 1000 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 68) Peanuts 10 80 1900 1900 2400 5300 120 580 1200 2000 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 69) Potato 25 80 750 750 950 2100 47 230 470 810 Sprays for Aerial application ( 70) potato 25 350 No Data No Data No Data 480 No Data No Data No Data 120 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 71) Soil band treatment ( broccoli, Chinese broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

Chinese cabbage,

cauliflower, collards,

kale, mustard) 30 80 630 630 800 1800 39 190 390 680 Table 15: Summery of Short and Intermediate Term Occupational Risk for PCNB Exposure Scenario ( Scenario #) Crop App Rate4 lbai/ A or lb ai/ gal Daily Area Treated A or gals Dermal MOE Inhalation MOE9 Baseline PPE1 PPE2 PPE3 PPE4 PPE5 PPE6 Eng. C Baseline PPE1 PPE4 PPE2 PPE5 PPE3 PPE6 Eng. C Page 54 of 73 Sprays for High Pressure HandWand application ( 72) containerized stock ( broccoli, Chinese broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

Chinese cabbage,

cauliflower, collards,

kale, mustard) 0.02 1000 gals 780 2200 3900 No Data 59 290 590 No Data Sprays for Airblast application ( 73) Foliar spray ( magnolia tree) 6 20 490 730 800 9200 130 650 1300 1300 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 74) Tomato, pepper 7.50 80 2500 2500 3200 7000 160 780 1600 2700 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 75) Southern pine ( seed orchard) 42.50 10 3500 3500 4500 9900 220 1100 2200 3800 Applying Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 76) Beans 1.50 80 18000 24000 42000 83000 490 2400 4900 2700 Applying Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 77) Soil band treatment ( broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

cauliflower, collards,

kale, mustard) 30 80 880 1200 2100 4200 24 120 240 130 Applying Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 78) Golf course turf ( tees/ greens) 43.56 10 4900 6700 11000 23000 130 670 1300 730 Applying Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 79) Golf course turf ( fairways) 43.56 40 1200 1700 2900 5700 33 170 330 180 Applying Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 80) Sod farms 43.56 80 610 840 1400 2900 17 84 170 91 Applying Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 81) Cotton 2 200 5300 7300 13000 25000 150 730 1500 800 Applying Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 82) Peanuts 2 80 13000 18000 31000 63000 360 1800 3600 2000 Applying Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 83) Pepper 1.35 80 20000 27000 46000 93000 540 2700 5400 2900 Table 15: Summery of Short and Intermediate Term Occupational Risk for PCNB Exposure Scenario ( Scenario #) Crop App Rate4 lbai/ A or lb ai/ gal Daily Area Treated A or gals Dermal MOE Inhalation MOE9 Baseline PPE1 PPE2 PPE3 PPE4 PPE5 PPE6 Eng. C Baseline PPE1 PPE4 PPE2 PPE5 PPE3 PPE6 Eng. C Page 55 of 73 Applying Granulars for Tractor Drawn Spreaders application ( 84) Potato 25 80 1100 1500 2500 5000 29 150 290 160 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 85) Beans( lima, snap,

dried) 1.50 80 13000 13000 16000 35000 790 3900 7900 14000 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 86) Soil band treatment ( broccoli, Chinese,

broccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage,

Chinese cabbage,

cauliflower, collards,

kale, mustard) 30 80 630 630 800 1800 39 190 390 680 Sprays for High Pressure HandWand application ( 87) commercial/ industrial lawns 0.50 1000 gals 23 66 120 No Data 1.8 8.8 18 No Data Sprays for Groundboom application ( 88) Cotton 2 200 3800 3800 4800 11000 240 1200 2400 4100 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 89) Sod farms 40.80 80 460 460 580 1300 29 140 290 500 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 89a) Sod farms 32.67 80 570 570 730 1600 36 180 360 620 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 90) Peanuts 2 80 9400 9400 12000 26000 590 2900 5900 10000 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 91) Pepper, tomato 7.50 80 2500 2500 3200 7000 160 780 1600 2700 Sprays for Groundboom application ( 92) Pine ( seed orchard) 37.50 10 4000 4000 5100 11000 250 1200 2500 4300 Flagger Flagging for Sprays application ( 93) Potato 25 350 220 240 240 11000 23 110 230 1100 Mixer/ Loader/ App Mixing/ Loading/ Applying Liquids for Handgun ( lawn) Sprayer ( ORETF) application ( 94) Ornamentals ( herbaceous plants,

woody shrubs and vines) 218 5 No Data No Data 77 No Data 36 No Data No Data No Data Mixing/ Loading/ Applying Liquids for Handgun ( lawn) Sprayer ( ORETF) application ( 95) Ornamental and Lawn turf 32.67 5 No Data No Data 510 No Data 240 No Data No Data No Data Table 15: Summery of Short and Intermediate Term Occupational Risk for PCNB Exposure Scenario ( Scenario #) Crop App Rate4 lbai/ A or lb ai/ gal Daily Area Treated A or gals Dermal MOE Inhalation MOE9 Baseline PPE1 PPE2 PPE3 PPE4 PPE5 PPE6 Eng. C Baseline PPE1 PPE4 PPE2 PPE5 PPE3 PPE6 Eng. C Page 56 of 73 Loading/ Applying Granulars for Push type spreader ( ORETF) application ( 96) Commercial industrial lawns 43.56 5 280 440 880 No Data 44 No Data No Data No Data Loading/ Applying Granulars for Belly Grinder application ( 97) ornamental lawns and turf 43.56 0.5 96 100 No Data No Data 52 270 520 No Data Loading/ Applying Granulars for Belly Grinder application ( 98) ornamentals ( shade trees, herbaceous,

woody shrubs and vines) 217.80 0.5 19 21 No Data No Data 10 54 100 No Data Loading/ Applying Granulars for Push type spreader ( ORETF) application ( 99) Ornamentals ( shade trees, herbaceous,

woody shrubs and vines) 217.80 0.5 550 880 1800 No Data 88 No Data No Data No Data Mixing/ Loading/ Applying Wet Powders for Low Pressure Handwand application ( 100) ornamental ( woody shrubs and vines,

herbaceous plants) 217.80 5 2.2 2.2 3.1 No Data 0.058 0.29 0.58 No Data Mixing/ Loading/ Applying Wet Powders for Low Pressure Handwand application ( 101) ornamental ( shade trees) 37.50 5 13 13 18 No Data 0.34 1.7 3.4 No Data Baseline : Occupational handlers using open mixing techniques and open cab tractors are wearing long sleeved shirts, long pants, no gloves, and no respirator.

PPE1: Occupational handlers using open mixing techniques and open cab tractors are wearing long sleeved shirts, long pants, chemical resistant gloves, and a no respirator.

PPE2: Occupational handlers using open mixing techniques and open cab tractors are wearing long sleeved shirts, long pants, chemical resistant gloves, and a dust/ mist ( 5 fold PF) respirator.

PPE3: Occupational handlers using open mixing techniques and open cab tractors are wearing long sleeved shirts, long pants, chemical resistant gloves, and an air purifying ( 10 fold PF) respirator.

PPE4: Occupational handlers using open mixing techniques and open cab tractors are wearing coveralls over long sleeved shirts, long pants, chemical resistant gloves, and no respirator.

PPE5: Occupational handlers using open mixing techniques and open cab tractors are wearing coveralls over long sleeved shirts, long pants, chemical resistant gloves, and a dust/ mist ( 5 fold PF)

respirator.

PPE6: Occupational handlers using open mixing techniques and open cab tractors are wearing coveralls over long sleeved shirts, long pants, chemical resistant gloves, and an air purifying ( 10 fold PF)

respirator. Engineering Controls: Occupational handlers using closed mixing techniques and enclosed cab tractors or cockpits while wearing long sleeved shirts, long pants, chemical resistant gloves, and no respiratory protection. Page 57 of 73 NO 2 Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl NH 2 Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl S CH 3 Cl 5 SCH 2 CHCO 2 H NHCCH 2 CO 2 H O Cl 5 APPENDIX 2 A compiled list of all metabolites of PCNB found in plant metabolism, animal metabolism, rotational crops, water, and rat ( toxic) studies.

# Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure 1 Potato ( 45307303) peanut ( 45307302) peanut roots ( 41562902) whole potato, callus, and peel ( 41562903) cabbage leaves ( 41562904) chicken fat ( 41692801) Rotational crops: lettuce, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) pentachloronitrobenzene ( PCNB)

2 Potato ( 45307303) peanut ( 45307302) whole potato and peel ( 41562903) goat liver ( 41692805) goat kidney ( 41692805) goat omental fat ( 41692805) goat renal fat ( 41692805) goat milk ( 41692805) chicken fat ( 41692801) egg yolk ( 41692801) Rotational crops: turnip top, turnip root, lettuce, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) pentachloroaniline ( PCA)

3 Potato ( 45307303) whole potato and peel ( 41562903) cabbage leaves ( 41562904) chicken thigh ( 41692801) egg yolk ( 41692801) Rotational crops: turnip root, lettuce, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) pentachlorothioanisole ( PCTA)

or,

( methyl pentachlorophenyl sulfide, MPCPS)

4 Potato ( 45307303) peanut ( 45307302) Rotational crops: lettuce ( 44577501) S( pentachlorophenyl) malonylcysteine ( PCP MalCys)

( C5MaCy) # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 58 of 73 SO 3 H Cl 4 NH 2 CH 3 Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl 5 NHOH Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl SCH 2 CHCOOH Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH NH 2 5 Potato ( 45307303) peanut ( 45307302) Rotational crops: wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) aminotetrachlorobenzene sulfonic acid ( AM TCB sulfonic acid)

( C4SANH)

( tetrachlorosulfanilic acid)

6 Potato ( 45307303) pentachloroanisole ( PCAN)

7 Potato ( 45307303) egg yolks ( 41692801) Rotational crops: lettuce, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) pentachlorobenzene ( PCB)

8 Potato ( 45307303) peanut root ( 41562902) whole potato, callus, and peel ( 41562903) cabbage leaves ( 41562904) goat liver ( 41692805) goat urine ( 41692805) chicken kidney ( 41692801) N hydroxypentachloroaniline ( NOHPCA)

9 Potato ( 45307303) potato callus and peel ( 41562903) S( pentachlorophenyl)   glutamyl cysteine ( PCP GluCys) # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 59 of 73 SCH 2 CHCONHCH 2 COOH Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH NH 2 SCH 2 CHCOOH Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl NHCOCH 2 COCH 3 O NH 2 SOCH 3 Cl 4 NH SO 3 H SCH 3 Cl 4 NO 2 Cl 4 SO 3 H Cl 4 NO 2 10 Potato ( 45307303) Rotational crops: wheat forage ( 44577501) S( pentachlorophenyl) glutathione ( PCP GSH)

11 Potato ( 45307303) peanut roots ( 41562902) whole potato callus, and peel ( 41592903) chicken excreta ( 41692801) S( pentachlorophenyl) malonylcysteine monomethyl ester ( PCP MalCys ester)

12 Potato ( 45307303) chicken fat ( 41692801) goat kidney ( 41692805) tetrachloroaniline methyl sulfoxide ( TCA sulfoxide isomers)

13 Potato ( 45307303) tetrachloro methylthio aniline sulfamate ( TC MET A sulfamate)

14 Potato ( 45307303) potato peel ( 41562903) tetrachloronitrobenzene ( TCNB isomers)

15 Potato ( 45307303) tetrachloronitrobenzene sulfonic acid ( TCNB sulfonic acid isomers) # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 60 of 73 NO 2 Cl 4 SCH 3 SOCH 3 Cl 4 OH SOCH 3 Cl 4 SH SO 3 H Cl 4 SH NH 2 Cl 4 NH 2 N H SO 3 H Cl 4 NH 2 NH 2 Cl 4 OH 16 Potato ( 45307303) tetrachloronitrothioanisole ( TCNTA isomers)

17 Potato ( 45307303) tetrachlorophenol methyl sulfoxide ( TCP sulfoxide)

18 Potato ( 45307303) tetrachlorothiophenol methyl sulfoxide ( TCTP sulfoxide)

19 Potato ( 45307303) tetrachlorothiophenol sulfonic acid ( TCTP sulfonic acid)

20 Potato ( 45307303) aminotetrachloroaniline ( AM TCA isomers)

21 Potato ( 45307303) aminotetrachloroaniline sulfamate ( AM TCA sulfamate)

22 Potato ( 45307303) hydroxytetrachloroaniline ( OH TCA) # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 61 of 73 NH 2 Cl 4 NHOH NHOH Cl 4 OH NHOH Cl 4 SCH 3 SCH 2 CHCONHCH 2 COOH NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH NH 2 Cl 4 SOCH 3 SCH 2 CHCOOH NHCOCH 2 COOH Cl 4 SOCH 3 23 Potato ( 45307303) N hydroxyamino tetrachloroaniline ( NOHAM TCA)

24 Potato ( 45307303) N hydroxyamino tetrachlorophenol ( NOHAM TCP)

25 Potato ( 45307303) N hydroxyaminotetrachlorothioanisole ( NOHAM TCTA isomers)

26 Potato ( 45307303) S( tetrachloro methyl sulfoxyphenyl glutathione ( TC MES PGSH

27 Potato ( 45307303) S( tetrachloro methyl sulfoxyphenyl malonylcysteine ( TC MESP MalCys) # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 62 of 73 SCH 2 CHCONHCH 2 COOH NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH NH 2 Cl 4 NO 2 SCH 2 CHCOOH NHCOCH 2 COOH Cl 4 NO 2 Cl 4 SCH 2 CHCONHCH 2 COOH NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH NH 2 2 Cl 4 SCH 2 COOH 2 SCH 2 CHCOOH Cl 4 SCH 2 CHCOOH NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH NH 2 NH 2 28 Potato ( 45307303) peanut ( 45307302) S( tetrachloronitrophenyl) glutathione ( TCNP GSH)

29 Potato ( 45307303) Peanut ( 45307302) S( tetrachloronitrophenyl) malonylcysteine ( TCNP MalCys)

30 Potato ( 45307303) S, S

 ( tetrachlorophenyl) diglutathione ( TCP diGSH)

31 Potato ( 45307303) S, S

 ( tetrachlorophenyl) dithioacetate ( TCP dithioacetate)

32 Potato ( 45307303) S, S

 ( tetrachlorophenyl)   glutamyl cysteine cysteine ( TCP GluCys Cys) # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 63 of 73 SCH 2 CHCOOH Cl 4 SCH 2 CHCOOH NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH OH NHCOCH 3 NH 2 NO 2 SOCH 3 Cl 3 NHOH Cl 3 SCH 3 2 NHOH OMe NH 2 Cl 3 Cl 3 SCH 2 CHCOOH NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH NH 2 NH 2 SCH 2 CHCOOH NH 2 33 Potato ( 45307303) acetyl S, S

 ( tetrachlorophenyl) cysteine cysteinyl   hydroxyglutarate ( AC TCP Cys CysHOG)

34 Potato ( 45307303) trichloronitroaniline methyl sulfoxide ( RCNA sulfoxide)

35 Potato ( 45307303) N hydroxy trichloro dimethylthioaniline ( NOH RC diMET A)

36 Potato ( 45307303) N hydroxyamino trichloro methoxyaniline ( NOHAM RC OME A)

37 Potato ( 45307303) S, S

 ( trichloroanilino)   glutamylcysteine cysteine ( RCAGluCys Cys) # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 64 of 73 Cl 3 SCH 2 CHCOOH NHCOCH 2 COOH SCH 2 COOH NO 2 Cl 3 SCH 2 CCOOH NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH NH 2 SCH 2 CHCOOH SCH 3 NH 2 Cl 3 SCH 2 CHCONHCH 2 COOH NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH NHCOCH 3 SCH 2 CHCOOH OMe NHCOCH 3 SCH 2 CHCOOH Cl 4 NH 2 NHCOCH 2 COOH 38 peanut ( 45307302) N malonyl S ( tetrachloroaminophenyl) cysteine 39 Potato ( 45307303) S, S

 ( trichloronitrophenyl) malonyl cysteine thioacetate ( RCNP MalCysthioacetate

40 Potato ( 45307303) S, S

 ( trichlorothioanisole)   glutamyl cysteine cysteine ( RCTAGluCys Cys)

41 Potato ( 45307303) diacetyl S, S

 ( trichloro anisole) glutathione cysteine ( diAC RCANGSH Cys) # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 65 of 73 Cl 3 SCH 3 SCH 2 CHCOOH NHCOCH 2 CH 2 CHCOOH NHCOCH 3 2 SO 3 H Cl 5 42 Potato ( 45307303) diacetyl S, S

 ( trichloro thioanisole) diglutathione ( diAC RCTAdiGluCys

43 Potato peel ( 41562903) Tetrachloronitrophenol ( TCNP)

44 potato peel ( 41562903) Tetrachlorophenol ( TCP)

45 peanut roots ( 41562902) Tetrachloroaniline ( TCA)

46 goat urine ( 41692805) Pentachloroaniline sulfamate 47 Rotational crops: turnip top, turnip root, lettuce, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) C5SA pentachlorobenzenesulfonic acid # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 66 of 73 48 goat liver ( 41692805) goat kidney ( 41692805) chicken excreta ( 41692801) chicken liver ( 41692801) egg yolk ( 41692801) Pentachlorothiophenol ( PCTP)

49 cabbage leaves ( 41562904) chicken liver ( 41692801) Rotational crops: turnip top, turnip root, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) Pentachlorothioanisole sulfoxide ( PCTA sulfoxide) ( PCTASO) ( C5MX)

50 goat kidney ( 41692805) chicken fat ( 41692801) Tetrachlorothioanisole ( TCTA)

51 cabbage leaves ( 41562904) Rotational crops: wheat straw ( 44577501) Tetrachlorophenyl methyl sulfoxide ( TCPM sulfoxide) ( C4MX)

52 cabbage leaves ( 41562904) chicken kidney ( 41692801) chicken thigh ( 41692801) Rotational Crops: turnip top, turnip root, lettuce ( 44577501) Tetrachlorophenyl methyl sulfone ( TCPM sulfone) ( TCTASOO) ( C4MS) ( TCP methyl sulfone)

53 cabbage ( 41562904) Rotational crops: turnip top, turnip root, lettuce, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) Trichlorophenyl methyl sulfone ( RCPM sulfone) ( C3MS) # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 67 of 73 54 cabbage leaves ( 41562904) Trichlorophenol methyl sulfone ( RCHM sulfone)

55 goat liver ( 41692805) goat kidney ( 41692805) goat urine ( 41692805) Tetrachloro ( methylthio) thiophenol ( TCTP S Met)

56 goat liver ( 41692805) Pentachlorothiophenol dimer ( PCTP dimer)

57 potato callus and peel ( 41562903) goat urine ( 41692805) Pentachlorothiophenyl conjugate ( PCTP X)

58 chicken excreta ( 41692801) chicken kidney ( 41692801) chicken liver ( 41692801) chicken thigh ( 41692801) S( pentachlorophenyl) thioacetate # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 68 of 73 59 chicken excreta ( 41692801) S( pentachlorophenyl) thiopyruvate 60 whole potato, callus, and peel ( 41562903) chicken kidney ( 41692801) S( pentachlorophenyl) cysteine ( PCP Cys)

61 peanut roots ( 41562902) S[( methylthio) tetrachlorophenyl] 2 thioacetic acid ( MTCP TAA)

62 potato callus and peel ( 41562903) Pentachlorothiophenyl glycoside ( PCTP Gly)

63 potato callus and peel ( 41562903) Pentachlorophenol glycoside ( PCPGly # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 69 of 73 SO 3 H Cl 4 SO 3 H Cl 3 SO 3 H Cl 2 S CH 3 O SO 3 H Cl 4 OH Cl 5 64 goat liver ( 41692805) goat kidney ( 41692805) N( pentachloroaniline) glucuronide ( PCA Gluc)

65 Rotational Crops: turnip top, turnip root ( 44577501) Pentachlorophenol ( PCP)

66 Rotational crops: turnip top, turnip root, lettuce, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) tetrachlorobenzenesulfonic acid ( C4SA)

67 Rotational crops: turnip top, turnip root, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) C3SA trichlorobenzenesulfonic acid 68 Rotational crops: turnip top, turnip root, wheat forage ( 44577501) C2SA dichlorobenzenesulfonic acid 69 Rotational crops: wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) C4MXSA tetrachlorosulfophenyl methyl sulfoxide ( tetrachlorothioanisole sulfoxide, sulfonic acid) # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 70 of 73 S CH 3 O Cl 3 SO 3 H S CH 3 O O Cl 4 SO 3 H S CH 3 O O SO 3 H Cl 3 S CH 3 O O CL 2 SO 3 H SO 3 H Cl 3 NH 2 70 Rotational crops: wheat straw ( 44577501) C3MXSA trichlorosulfophenyl methyl sulfoxide ( trichlorothioanisole sulfoxide, sulfonic acid)

71 Rotational crops: wheat straw ( 44577501) C4MSSA tetrachlorosulfophenyl methyl sulfone ( tetrachlorothioanisole sulfone, sulfonic acid)

72 Rotational crops: turnip top, turnip root, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) C3MSSA trichlorosulfophenyl methyl sulfone ( trichlorothioanisole sulfone, sulfonic acid)

73 Rotational crops: wheat straw ( 44577501) C2MSSA dichlorosulfophenyl methyl sulfone ( dichlorothioanisole, sulfonic acid)

74 Rotational crops: wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) C3SANH trichlorosulfanilic acid # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 71 of 73 SO 3 H Cl 3 OH SCH 2 CHCH 3 Cl 4 HNCCH 3 O SCH 2 CHCO 2 H SCH 2 CHCO 2 H Cl 4 NHCOH NHCOCH 2 CO 2 H SO 3 hexose Cl 5 SCH 2 CHCO 2 H SCH 2 CHCO 2 H Cl 4 NH 2 NH 2 75 Rotational crops: wheat forage ( 44577501) C3SAOH hydroxy trichlorobenzene sulfonic acid ( trichloro hydroxybenzene sulfonic acid)

76 Rotational crops: lettuce, wheat forage, wheat straw ( 44577501) C4MeAcCy N{ 1 methyl 2[( tetrachlorophenyl) thio] ethyl} acetamide ( tetrachlorophenyl methyl cysteine)

77 Rotational crops: lettuce, wheat forage ( 44577501) C4MaCyFCy S( tetrachlorophenyl) Nmalonylcysteine S' formylcysteine 78 Rotational crops: wheat forage ( 44577501) C5SAHx b pentachlorobenzenesulfonic acid hexose ester 79 Rotational crops: wheat forage ( 44577501) C4CyCy S, S' tetrachlorophenyl dicysteine # Matrices ( MRID in parentheses) Chemical Name ( other names in parenthesis) Structure Page 72 of 73 SCH 2 CHCO 2 H SCH 2 CHCO 2 H Cl 4 NHCOH NH 2 S O O CH 3 SCH 2 CHCO 2 H Cl 3 NHCCH 2 CO 2 H O S O O CH 3 SCH 2 CHCO 2 H Cl 2 NHCCH 2 CO 2 H O Cl Cl Cl Cl N Cl O H gluc S O O CH 3 Cl 5 80 Rotational crops: lettuce ( 44577501) C4CyFCy S( tetrachlorophenyl) cysteine S' formylcysteine 81 Rotational crops: turnip root, lettuce ( 44577501) C3MSMaCy N malonyl S trichloro ( methylsulfonophenyl) L cysteine S( trichlorophenyl methyl sulfone) malonyl cysteine 82 Rotational crops: turnip top, turnip root ( 44577501) C2MSMaCy N malonyl S dichloro ( methylsulfonophenyl) L cysteine S( dichlorophenyl methyl sulfone) malonyl cysteine 83 Goat liver ( 41692805) glucuronide of NOHPCA ( NOHPCA Gluc)

84 Water ( minor degradate) pentachlorothioanisole sulfone ( PCTASO2) Page 73 of 73


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 125 (Tuesday, June 30, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37203-37205]
[FR Doc No: 2015-16105]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2015-0345]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Ohio River between Mile 25.2 and 25.8; New Brighton,
PA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is proposing to establish a temporary safety
zone on the Ohio River Mile from mile 25.2 to mile 25.8. The proposed
safety zone will be effective from 8:45 p.m. to 11:15 p.m. on August
22, 2015. This safety zone is needed to protect persons and vessels
from the potential safety hazards associated with the Beaver County
Regatta Fireworks. Entry into this zone will be prohibited to all
vessels, mariners, and persons unless specifically authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), Pittsburgh or a designated representative.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before July 15, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number using
any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries
accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for further instructions
on submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these three methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email MST1 Jennifer Haggins, Marine Safety Unit Pittsburgh
Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone (412)221-
0807, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Cheryl F. Collins,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
SAR Search and Rescue

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking, indicate the specific section of this document to which
each comment applies, and provide a reason for each suggestion or
recommendation. You may submit your comments and material online at
http://www.regulations.gov, or by fax, mail, or hand delivery, but
please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online, it
will be considered received by the Coast Guard when you successfully
transmit the comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or mail your comment,
it will be considered as having been received by the Coast Guard when
it is received at the Docket Management Facility. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing address, an email address, or a
telephone number in the body of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number [USCG-2015-0345] in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated with
this rulemaking.
    If you submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them
in an unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit comments by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2015-0345) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH.'' Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this rulemaking. You may also visit the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the methods specified under ADDRESSES.
Please explain why you believe a public meeting would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a
time and place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    The Coast Guard has a long history working with local, state, and
federal agencies in areas to improve emergency response, to prepare for
events that call for swift action, and to protect our nation. The Coast
Guard is proposing to establish this safety zone on the waters of the
Ohio River for the Beaver County Regatta fireworks. The marine event is
scheduled to take place from 8:45 p.m. to 11:15 p.m. on August 22,
2015. This proposed rule is necessary to protect the safety of the
participants, spectators, commercial traffic, and the general public on
the navigable waters of the United States during the event.

C. Basis and Purpose

    The legal basis and authorities for this proposed rule are found in
33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1; 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and
160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1, which
collectively authorize the Coast Guard to propose, establish, and
define regulatory safety zones. The purpose of this proposed safety
zone is to protect public boaters and their vessels from potential
safety hazards associated with the Beaver County Regatta Fireworks on
the Ohio River, including falling embers and debris.

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    This proposed rule is necessary to establish a safety zone that
will encompass all waters of the Ohio River in New Brighton,
Pennsylvania. The proposed safety zone will be enforced from
approximately 8:45 p.m. to 11:15 p.m., for approximately 2 hour 30
minutes on August 22, 2015. As proposed, the safety zone would be a
complete closure of the Ohio River from mile 25.2 to mile 25.8 from
8:45 p.m. to 11:15 p.m. on August 22, 2015. All persons and vessels,
except those persons and vessels participating in the marine fireworks
event and those vessels enforcing the areas, would be prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
proposed safety zone area.
    Persons and vessels may request authorization to enter, transit
though, anchor in, or remain within the enforcement areas by contacting
the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or a
designated representative via VHF radio on channel 16. If authorization
to enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain within the enforcement
areas is granted by the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh or a designated
representative, all persons and vessels receiving such authorization
must comply with the instructions of the Captain of the Port Pittsburgh
or a designated representative.

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a significant regulatory action under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Executive Order 12866 or
under section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under those Orders. The temporary safety
zone listed in this proposed rule will restrict vessel traffic from
entering, transiting, or anchoring within a portion of the Ohio River.
The effect of this proposed regulation will not be significant for
several reasons: (1) The amount of time the Ohio River will be closed,
and (2) the impacts on routine navigation are expected to be minimal
because notifications to the marine community will be made through
local notice to mariners (LNM) and broadcast notice to mariners (BNM).
Therefore, these notifications will allow the public to plan operations
around the proposed safety zone and its enforcement times.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
    This proposed rule will affect the following entities, some of
which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit the Ohio River from mile 25.2 to mile 25.8
effective from 8:45 p.m. to 11:15 p.m. on August 22, 2015. This
proposed safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because this proposed rule will
impede navigational traffic for a short period of time. Traffic in this
area is almost entirely limited to recreational vessels and commercial
towing vessels. Notifications to the marine community will be made
through BNMs and electronic mail. Notices of changes to the proposed
safety zone and scheduled effective times and enforcement periods will
also be made. Deviation from the proposed restrictions may be requested
from the COTP or designated representative and will be considered on a
case-by-case basis.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule will not call for a new collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3520.).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
determined that this rule does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule would not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This proposed rule is not an economically significant rule and
would not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that
might disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule
involves establishing a temporary safety zone. The safety zone will be
on the Ohio River mile 25.2 to mile 25.8 from 8:45 p.m. to 11:15 p.m.
on August 22, 2015. This action is necessary to protect persons and
property during the Beaver County Regatta Fireworks. This proposed rule
is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 34(g) of
Figure 2-1 of the Commandant Instruction. A preliminary environmental
analysis checklist supporting this determination and a Categorical
Exclusion Determination are available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1231; 50 U.S.C. 191; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
0170.1.

0
2. A new temporary Sec.  165.T08-0345 is added to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0345  Safety zone; Ohio River between mile 25.2 and 25.8;
New Brighton, PA.

    (a) Locations. The following area is a temporary safety zone: All
waters on the Ohio River Mile from mile 25.2 to mile 25.8.
    (b) Effective date and time. The safety zone listed in section (a)
is effective from 8:45 p.m. to 11:15 p.m. on August 22, 2015.
    (c) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23 of this part, entry into this area is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP) Pittsburgh or a designated
representative.
    (2) Spectator vessels may safely transit outside the safety zones
at a minimum safe speed, but may not anchor, block, loiter, or impede
participants or official patrol vessels.
    (3) Vessels requiring entry into or passage through the safety
zones must request permission from the COTP Pittsburgh or a designated
representative. They may be contacted by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) All vessels shall comply with the instructions of the COTP
Pittsburgh and designated personnel. Designated personnel include
commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.
    (d) Informational Broadcasts: The Captain of the Port, Pittsburgh
or a designated representative will inform the public through broadcast
notices to mariners (BNM) of the effective period for the safety zone
and of any changes in the effective period, enforcement times, or size
of the safety zones.

    Dated: May 27, 2015.
L.N. Weaver,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port Pittsburgh.
[FR Doc. 2015-16105 Filed 6-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P