[Federal Register: October 10, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 198)]
[Notices]
[Page 60386-60388]
[DOCID:fr10oc08-150]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-58717; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2008-106]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule
6.87--Obvious Errors and Catastrophic Errors

 October 2, 2008.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 2, 2008, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items
have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. NYSE Arca filed
the proposed rule change as a ``non-controversial'' proposal pursuant
to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon filing with
the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.87--Obvious Errors and
Catastrophic Errors. The text of the proposed rule change is available
at the principal office of the Exchange, the Commission's Public
Reference Room, and at www.nyse.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this filing is to amend Exchange rules governing
obvious and catastrophic errors, by adding provisions which will allow
for the nullification of trades that are a result of either an
erroneous quote, or print, in the underlying security. Specifically,
NYSE Arca is proposing new Rule 6.87(a)(4) Erroneous Print in the
Underlying, and new Rule 6.87(a)(5) Erroneous Quote in the Underlying.
    Market participants on NYSE Arca base the value of their quotes and
orders off of the price of underlying security. These two proposed
provisions cover

instances where the information the market participants are using to
price options is erroneous, through no fault of their own. An erroneous
quote or print in an underlying security, which is disseminated by the
primary market \5\ for that security, means that market participants
are receiving erroneous information which they then incorporate into
trading decisions. In these instances, market participants have little
if any chance of pricing options accurately. In order to provide relief
from transactions that occur as a result of these erroneous prints and/
or quotes, the Exchange proposes the following provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ NYSE Arca Rule 6.1(b)(27) defines Primary Market as the
principal market in which the underlying stock or Exchange-Traded
Fund Share is traded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rule 6.87(a)(4) Erroneous Print in Underlying
    An electronic trade resulting from an erroneous print disseminated
by the underlying market which is later cancelled or corrected by that
underlying market may be nullified. In order to be nullified, however,
the trade must be the result of an erroneous print that is higher or
lower than the average trade in the underlying security during a two-
minute period before and after the erroneous print by an amount at
least five times greater than the average quote width for such
underlying security during the same period.
    For purposes of this Rule, the average trade in the underlying
security shall be determined by adding the prices of each trade during
the four minute time period referenced above (excluding the trade in
question) and dividing by the number of trades during such time period
(excluding the trade in question). For purposes of this Rule, the
average quote width shall be determined by adding the quote widths of
each separate quote during the four minute time period referenced above
(excluding the quote in question) and dividing by the number of quotes
during such time period (excluding the quote in question).
Rule 6.87(a)(5) Erroneous Quote in Underlying
    Electronic trades resulting from an erroneous quote in the
underlying security may be adjusted or nullified as set forth in
section (a)(3) of Rule 6.87. An erroneous quote occurs when the
underlying security has a width of at least $1.00 and has a width at
least five times greater than the average quote width for such
underlying security on the primary market (as defined in Rule
6.1(b)(27)) during the time period encompassing two minutes before and
after the dissemination of such quote. For purposes of this Rule, the
average quote width shall be determined by adding the quote widths of
each separate quote during the four minute time period referenced above
(excluding the quote in question) and dividing by the number of quotes
during such time period (excluding the quote in question) and dividing
by the number of quotes during such time period (excluding the quote in
question).
    These proposed rule changes will provide market participants on
NYSE Arca the same opportunities for price adjustment or trade
nullification that are available on other options exchanges. The
Exchange notes that these provisions are similar in all respects to
rules already approved for use at The Chicago Board Options Exchange
(``CBOE'') \6\ and The American Stock Exchange (``Amex'').\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See CBOE Rules 6.25(a)(4)-(5).
    \7\ See Amex Rules 936-ANTE(a)(4)-(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with section
6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of section
6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it is designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and
equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. NYSE Arca
believes that this proposal is appropriate given that it provides for
the adjustment or nullification of trades, which are executed at
clearly erroneous prices due to no fault of the participants on the
trade.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (1) Does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (2) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (3) by its terms does not become operative for 30 days after the
date of this filing, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate if consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest, the proposed rule change has become effective pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \10\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
thereunder.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing. In addition,
Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
provide the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the
proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the
proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of
filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated
by the Commission. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
requests that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay as well
as the five business-day pre-filing requirement to allow the Exchange
to immediately offer market participants on NYSE Arca the same
potential for relief that is available at other option exchanges, when
an erroneous print, or quote, in an underlying security occurs on the
primary market. The Exchange argued that such flexibility is
increasingly important in light of recent market volatility. The
Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay \12\ is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest.\13\ Given that the Exchange's proposed rule change is
substantially similar to the rules of other exchanges previously
approved by the Commission,\14\ the proposal does not appear to present
any novel regulatory issues. Therefore, the Commission

designates the proposal operative upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
    \13\ The Commission is also waiving the five business-day pre-
filing requirement.
    \14\ See Amex Rule 936-ANTE(a)(4)-(5) and CBOE Rule 6.25(a)(4)-
(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-106 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-106. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2008-106 and should
be submitted on or before October 31, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Acting Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-24179 Filed 10-9-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 169 (Tuesday, September 1, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 52774]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21605]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2007-0008]

National Advisory Council; Meeting

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Committee Management; Notice of Federal Advisory Committee
Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National
Advisory Council (NAC) will meet in person on September 16, 17, and 18,
2015 in Washington, DC. The meeting will be open to the public.

DATES: The NAC will meet on Wednesday, September 16, 2015, from 9:30
a.m. to 2:30 p.m., on Thursday, September 17, 2015 from 8:30 a.m. to
5:30 p.m., and on Friday, September 18 from 8:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.
Eastern Daylight Time (EDT). Please note that the meeting may close
early if the NAC has completed its business.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Kellogg Conference Center at
Gallaudet University located at 800 Florida Avenue NE., in Washington,
DC 20002-3695. All visitors to the Kellogg Conference Center are
required to register with FEMA prior to the meeting in order to be
admitted to the building. Please provide your name, telephone number,
email address, title, and organization by close of business on
September 14, 2015, to the person listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT below.
    For information on facilities or services for individuals with
disabilities or to request special assistance at the meeting, contact
the person listed in FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT below as soon as
possible.
    To facilitate public participation, members of the public are
invited to provide written comments on the issues to be considered by
the NAC (see ``Agenda''). Written comments must be submitted and
received by 5:00 p.m. EDT on September 11, 2015, identified by Docket
ID FEMA-2007-0008, and submitted by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Include the docket number
in the subject line of the message.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Regulatory Affairs Division, Office of Chief
Counsel, FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Room 8NE, Washington, DC 20472-3100.
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the words
``Federal Emergency Management Agency'' and the docket number for this
action. Comments received will be posted without alteration at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read comments received by the
NAC, go to http://www.regulations.gov, and search for the Docket ID
listed above.
    A public comment period will be held on Thursday, September 17 from
3:30 p.m. to 3:45 p.m. EDT. All speakers must limit their comments to 3
minutes. Comments should be addressed to the committee. Any comments
not related to the agenda topics will not be considered by the NAC.
Contact the individual listed below to register as a speaker by
September 11, 2015. Please note that the public comment period may end
before the time indicated, following the last call for comments.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexandra Woodruff, Alternate
Designated Federal Officer, Office of the National Advisory Council,
Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC
20472-3184, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, and email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The NAC Web site is: http://www.fema.gov/national-advisory-council.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of this meeting is given under the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Appendix.
    The NAC advises the FEMA Administrator on all aspects of emergency
management. The NAC incorporates state, local, and tribal government,
and private sector input in the development and revision of FEMA plans
and strategies. The NAC includes a substantive cross-section of
officials, emergency managers, and emergency response providers from
state, local, and tribal governments, the private sector, and
nongovernmental organizations.
    Agenda: On Wednesday, September 16, the NAC will be welcomed to
Gallaudet University by the NAC Chair and Vice Chair. The NAC will also
receive briefings from FEMA Executive Staff on the following topics:
     FEMA Office of Response and Recovery Updates
     FEMA National Preparedness Directorate Updates
     FEMA Flood Insurance and Mitigation Administration Updates
    On Thursday, September 17, the NAC will hear remarks from the
President of Gallaudet University and the Director of the District of
Columbia Homeland Security and Emergency Management Agency. The NAC
will engage in an open discussion with the FEMA Administrator. The
three NAC subcommittees: Federal Insurance and Mitigation Subcommittee,
Preparedness and Protection Subcommittee, and Response and Recovery
Subcommittee, will then provide reports to the NAC about their work,
whereupon the NAC will deliberate on any recommendations presented in
the subcommittees' reports, and, if appropriate, vote on
recommendations for FEMA's consideration. The subcommittee reports will
be posted on the NAC Web page by 8:30 a.m. on Thursday, September 17.
There will be a public comment period immediately following the close
of subcommittee reports. The NAC will then hear remarks from the
Director of FEMA's Office of Disability Integration and Coordination
and engage in a facilitated discussion of the status of previously
submitted NAC recommendations.
    On Friday, September 18, the NAC will hear remarks from the NAC
Chair and Vice Chair, engage in an open discussion with the FEMA Deputy
Administrator, followed by an update from the FEMA National Tribal
Affairs Advisor, an update on children's needs, and NAC member
presentations.
    The full agenda and any related documents for this meeting will be
posted by Monday, September 14 on the NAC Web site at http://www.fema.gov/national-advisory-council.

    Dated: August 26, 2015.
W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2015-21605 Filed 8-31-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-48-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 212 (Monday, November 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65279-65280]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26012]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73452; File No. SR-BX-2014-054]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Relating to
Billing Policy

October 28, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 24, 2014, NASDAQ OMX BX, Inc. (``BX'' or ``Exchange'') filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'')
the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange Rule 7011, and re-title it
``Collection of Exchange Fees and Other Claims and Billing Policy,''
and to require BX members to submit billing disputes within a certain
time period.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxbx.cchwallstreet.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend Rule 7011,
which was recently filed,\3\ to require all pricing disputes to be
submitted to the Exchange in writing \4\ and accompanied by supporting
documentation within sixty days of receipt of an invoice. The Exchange
believes that this practice will conserve Exchange resources which are
expended when untimely billing disputes require staff to research
applicable fees and order information beyond two months after the
transaction occurred.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See SR-BX-2014-050.
    \4\ The Exchange invoice specifies the Exchange contact persons
with whom to dispute the invoice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The sixty days would first apply to invoices related to
transactional billing in December 2014 and would apply thereafter.\5\
The Exchange proposes to apply the billing policy in Rule 7011 to the
following 7000 series Rules: 7001 (Membership Fees), 7015 (Access
Services), 7016 (BX Pre-Trade Risk Management), 7018 (NASDAQ OMX BX
Equities System Order Execution and Routing), 7021 (BX Trading and
Compliance Data Package Fee), 7027 (Aggregation of Activity of
Affiliated Members), 7029 (Installation, Removal or Relocation), 7030
(Other Services), 7034 (Co-Location Services), 7051 (Direct
Connectivity to BX), 7055 (Short Sale Monitor), 7058 (QView).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ This proposal would not apply to invoices related to
November 2014 billing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, this proposal would provide a cost savings to the Exchange
in that it would alleviate administrative processes related to the
untimely review of billing disputes which divert staff resources away
from the Exchange's regulatory and business purposes.
    In addition, the Exchange proposes to amend the title of Exchange
Rule 7011 from ``Collection of Exchange Fees and Other Claims'' to
``Collection of Exchange Fees and Other Claims and Billing Policy.''
The Exchange believes that the proposed title provides a more specific
description of Rule 7011.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \7\ in particular, in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general to protect investors and the public interest,
by providing a uniform practice for disputing fees.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the requirement that all pricing disputes,
for certain specified fees and rebates, must be submitted to the
Exchange within sixty days from receipt of the invoice will provide its
members with guidance on disputing pricing. The proposal equally
applies to all BX members. Also, the Exchange's administrative costs
would be lowered as a result of this policy because staff resources
would not be diverted to review untimely requests regarding billing.
    The Exchange believes that sixty days is ample time to review an
invoice and dispute any pricing related to the transactions for that
time period. This policy applies today with respect to BX Options
billing.\8\ The Exchange is seeking to apply this policy to all BX
members alike in the same manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Chapter XV, Section 7 in the BX Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance

of the purposes of the Act. The billing policy would apply uniformly to
all BX equity members as it does today with all Options Participants.
All BX members would be subject to this policy.
    Further, this proposal would provide a cost savings to the Exchange
in that it would alleviate administrative processes related to the
untimely review of billing disputes which divert staff resources away
from the Exchange's regulatory and business purposes.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not significantly
affect the protection of investors or the public interest; does not
impose any significant burden on competition; and by its terms does not
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) \9\ of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: Necessary
or appropriate in the public interest; for the protection of investors;
or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved
or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-BX-2014-054 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2014-054. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal offices of the Exchange.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-BX-2014-054,
and should be submitted on or before November 24, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26012 Filed 10-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 18 (Monday, January 30, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8743-8744]
[FR Doc No: 2017-01918]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP17-21-000.
    Applicants: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC.
    Description: Algonquin Gas Transmission, LLC submits tariff filing
per: AIM West Roxbury Lateral Notice of Commencement of Service to be
effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/16/16.
    Accession Number: 20161216-5056.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/28/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-265-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/16/16 Negotiated Rates--Consolidated Edison
Energy Inc. (HUB) 2275-89 to be effective 12/15/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/16/16.
    Accession Number: 20161216-5061.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/28/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-266-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/16/16 Negotiated Rates--Hartree Partners, LP
(HUB) 7090-89 to be effective 12/15/2016
    Filed Date: 12/16/16.
    Accession Number: 20161216-5064.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/28/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-267-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/16/16 Negotiated Rates--Mercuria Energy America,
Inc. (HUB)--7540-89 to be effective 12/15/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/16/16.
    Accession Number: 20161216-5066.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/28/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-268-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/16/16--Multi Shipper Contracts to be effective
2/14/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/16/16.
    Accession Number: 20161216-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/28/16.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-269-000.
    Applicants: NGO Transmission, Inc.
    Description: NGO Transmission, Inc. submits tariff filing per
154.204: Negotiated Rate Filing to be effective 1/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/19/16.
    Accession Number: 20161219-5092.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-270-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/19/16 Negotiated Rates--Consolidated Edison
Energy Inc. (HUB) 2275-89 to be effective 12/16/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/19/16.
    Accession Number: 20161219-5159.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-271-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/19/16 Negotiated Rates--Hartree Partners, LP
(HUB) 7090-89 to be effective 12/16/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/19/16.
    Accession Number: 20161219-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-272-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/19/16 Negotiated Rates--Mercuria Energy America,
Inc. (HUB) 7540-89 to be effective 12/16/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/19/16.
    Accession Number: 20161219-5163.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-273-000.
    Applicants: Alliance Pipeline L.P.
    Description: Alliance Pipeline L.P. submits tariff filing per
154.204: J. Aron

Temporary Negotiated Rate Contracts to be effective 12/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/19/16.
    Accession Number: 20161219-5222.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-274-000.
    Applicants: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C.
    Description: El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: Housekeeping Matters to be effective 1/18/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/19/16.
    Accession Number: 20161219-5359.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-275-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/20/16 Negotiated Rates--Consolidated Edison
Energy Inc. (HUB) 2275-89 to be effective 12/19/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/20/16.
    Accession Number: 20161220-5115.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-276-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/20/16 Negotiated Rates--Hartree Partners, LP
(HUB) 7090-89 to be effective 12/19/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/20/16.
    Accession Number: 20161220-5116.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-277-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/20/16 Negotiated Rates--Mercuria Energy America,
Inc. (HUB) 7590-89 to be effective 12/19/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/20/16.
    Accession Number: 20161220-5119.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-278-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/20/16 Negotiated Rates--Cargill Incorporated
(RTS) 3085-28 to be effective 1/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/20/16.
    Accession Number: 20161220-5298.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-279-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/20/16 Negotiated Rates--Mercuria Energy America,
Inc. (RTS) 7540-09 to be effective 1/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/20/16.
    Accession Number: 20161220-5318.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-280-000.
    Applicants: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P.
    Description: Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. submits tariff
filing per 154.204: 12/20/16 Negotiated Rates--Vitol Inc. (RTS) 7495-02
to be effective 1/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/20/16.
    Accession Number: 20161220-5319.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP16-1179-002.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits tariff filing per 154.203:
Negotiated Rate Service Agreement--Revised EQT Energy OVC Agreement to
be effective 10/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/21/16.
    Accession Number: 20161221-5081.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-281-000.
    Applicants: Equitrans, L.P.
    Description: Equitrans, L.P. submits tariff filing per 154.204:
Negotiated Rate Service Agreement--K Petroleum to be effective 1/1/
2017.
    Filed Date: 12/21/16.
    Accession Number: 20161221-5109.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: RP17-282-000.
    Applicants: Portland Natural Gas Transmission System.
    Description: Portland Natural Gas Transmission System submits
tariff filing per 154.204: Housekeeping Updates to be effective 1/21/
2017.
    Filed Date: 12/21/16.
    Accession Number: 20161221-5112.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/17.

    Docket Numbers: CP17-25-000.
    Applicants: ANR Pipeline Company.
    Description: Abbreviated Application for 7(b) Authorization to
Abandon Rate Schedule X-132.
    Filed Date: 12/26/16.
    Accession Number: 20161216-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/27/17.

    Docket Numbers: CP06-5-013.
    Applicants: Empire Pipeline, Inc.
    Description: Petition to further Amend its Certificate of Public
Convenience and Necessity and Related authorizations.
    Filed Date: 12/13/16.
    Accession Number: 20161213-5311.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/28/16.

    Any person desiring to protest in any of the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 21, 2016.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-01918 Filed 1-27-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 129 (Friday, July 7, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 31464-31468]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14204]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0561; FRL-9964-58-Region 3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Pennsylvania; Volatile Organic Compound Reasonably Available Control
Technology for 1997 Ozone Standard

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve revisions to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
state implementation plan (SIP). This SIP revision pertains to the
requirements for reasonably available control technology (RACT)
controls for certain sources of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) under
the 1997 ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). This SIP
revision includes Pennsylvania's certification that previously adopted
RACT controls in Pennsylvania's SIP that were approved by EPA under the
1-hour ozone NAAQS are based on the currently available technically and
economically feasible controls, and that they continue to represent
RACT for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and a negative declaration that certain
categories of sources do not exist in Pennsylvania. This SIP revision
does not address Pennsylvania's May 2016 VOC and nitrogen oxides
(NOX) RACT rule, ``Additional RACT Requirements for Major
Sources of NOX and VOCs,'' also known as RACT II. EPA will
take separate action on RACT II. EPA is approving these revisions
addressing VOC RACT for the 1997 ozone NAAQS in accordance with the
requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

DATES: This rule is effective on October 5, 2017 without further
notice, unless EPA receives adverse written comment by August 7, 2017.
If EPA receives such comments, it will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2016-0561 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the ``For Further Information Contact'' section. For the
full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Maria A Pino,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 25, 2006, the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania through the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection (PADEP) submitted a revision to its SIP that addresses
certain requirements of RACT under the 1997 ozone NAAQS. The SIP
revision was entitled, ``Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State
Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision Under the 8-Hour Ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS),'' September 2006, and will be
referred to in this rulemaking action as ``the 2006 RACT SIP.'' On June
27, 2016, PADEP withdrew from EPA review portions of the 2006 RACT SIP
revision related to RACT for major stationary sources of VOC and
NOX. EPA has included in the docket a redacted version of
the 2006 RACT SIP to identify which portions of this document remain
before EPA and are the subject of this notice of proposed rulemaking.
Pennsylvania addressed the

remaining RACT requirements for the 1997 ozone NAAQS (which
Pennsylvania withdrew from the 2006 RACT SIP) in a subsequent SIP
revision submittal, which will be the subject of a separate rulemaking
action.

I. Background

    Ozone is formed in the atmosphere by photochemical reactions
between VOCs, NOX, and carbon monoxide (CO) in the presence
of sunlight. In order to reduce ozone concentrations in the ambient
air, the CAA requires all nonattainment areas to apply control on VOC
and NOX emission sources to achieve emission reductions.
Among effective control measures, RACT controls significantly reduce
VOC and NOX emissions from major stationary sources.
    RACT is defined as the lowest emission limitation that a particular
source is capable of meeting by the application of control technology
that is reasonably available considering technological and economic
feasibility (44 FR 53761 at 53762, September 17, 1979). Section 182 of
the CAA sets forth two separate RACT requirements for ozone
nonattainment areas. The first requirement, contained in section
182(a)(2)(A) of the CAA, and referred to as RACT fix-up requires the
correction of RACT rules for which EPA identified deficiencies before
the CAA was amended in 1990. Pennsylvania previously corrected its
deficiencies under the 1-hour ozone standard and has no further
deficiencies to correct under this section of the CAA. The second
requirement, set forth in section 182(b)(2) of the CAA, applies to
moderate (or worse) ozone nonattainment area as well as to marginal and
attainment areas in ozone transport regions (OTRs) established pursuant
to section 184 of the CAA, and requires these areas to implement RACT
controls on all major VOC and NOX emission sources and on
all sources and source categories covered by a control technique
guideline (CTG) issued by EPA.\1\ See CAA section 182(b)(2) and 184(b).
Alternatively, if a state has no sources in a particular source
category covered by an EPA CTG, the state may submit a negative
declaration in a SIP submittal asserting no subject sources are within
the state.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ CTGs are documents issued by EPA intended to provide state
and local air pollution control authorities information to assist
them in determining RACT for VOC from various sources. The
recommendations in the CTG are based upon available data and
information and may not apply to a particular situation based upon
the circumstances. States can follow the CTG and adopt state
regulations to implement the recommendations contained therein, or
they can adopt alternative approaches. In either case, states must
submit their RACT rules to EPA for review and approval as part of
the SIP process. Pursuant to section 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA, all
areas in the OTR must implement RACT with respect to sources of VOCs
in the state covered by a CTG issued before or after November 15,
1990.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 1997, EPA revised the health-based NAAQS for ozone, setting it
at 0.08 parts per million (ppm) averaged over an 8-hour time frame. EPA
set the 8-hour ozone standard based on scientific evidence
demonstrating that ozone causes adverse health effects at lower ozone
concentrations and over longer periods of time, than was understood
when the pre-existing 1-hour ozone standard was set. EPA determined
that the 8-hour standard would be more protective of human health,
especially children and adults who are active outdoors, and individuals
with a preexisting respiratory disease, such as asthma. EPA
subsequently revised the ozone NAAQS in 2008 and again in 2015. This
rulemaking only addresses SIP requirements under the 1997 ozone NAAQS.
    The entire Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is in the OTR. Therefore,
under CAA section 184, the entire Commonwealth was subject to RACT
requirements under the 1-hour ozone standard. Pennsylvania has
implemented numerous RACT controls to meet the CAA RACT requirements
under the 1-hour and 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. These RACT controls were
promulgated in title 25 of the Pennsylvania Code, chapter 129,
Standards for Sources.
    EPA requires under the 1997 ozone NAAQS that states meet the CAA
RACT requirements, either through a certification that previously
adopted RACT controls in their SIP revisions approved by EPA under the
1-hour ozone NAAQS represent adequate RACT control levels for 1997
ozone NAAQS attainment purposes, or through the adoption of new or more
stringent regulations that represent RACT control levels. A
certification must be accompanied by appropriate supporting information
such as consideration of information received during the public comment
period and consideration of new data. This information may supplement
existing RACT guidance documents that were developed for the 1-hour
standard, such that the State's SIP accurately reflects RACT for the 8-
hour ozone standard based on the current availability of technically
and economically feasible controls. Adoption of new RACT regulations
will occur when states have new stationary sources not covered by
existing RACT regulations, or when new data or technical information
indicates that a previously adopted RACT measure does not represent a
newly available RACT control level. Pursuant to section 184(b)(1)(B) of
the CAA, Pennsylvania had the obligation for the 1997 ozone NAAQS to
implement RACT with respect to sources of VOCs in the Commonwealth
covered by a CTG issued before or after November 15, 1990 (but before
September 15, 2006 when SIP requirements were due for the 1997 ozone
NAAQS). Another 1997 ozone NAAQS requirement for RACT is to submit a
negative declaration that there are no CTG or non-CTG major sources of
VOC and NOX emissions within the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. The RACT requirements for the 1997 ozone NAAQS were due
to EPA as SIP revisions by September 15, 2006. As stated above, PADEP
submitted its 2006 RACT SIP on September 25, 2006 to address RACT
requirements for certain VOC sources and for CTG sources.

II. Summary of SIP Revision

    Pennsylvania's 2006 RACT SIP revision satisfies certain RACT
requirements for the 1997 ozone NAAQS through certification that
previously adopted RACT controls in Pennsylvania's SIP that were
approved by EPA under the 1-hour ozone NAAQS are based on the currently
available technically and economically feasible controls, and continues
to represent RACT for the 1997 ozone NAAQS and negative declarations
that certain CTG source categories do not exist in Pennsylvania.
CTG Source Categories
    Table 1 lists the CTG source categories due which were required to
have RACT rules under the 1997 ozone NAAQS as these CTGs were issued by
EPA prior to the due date for SIP requirements for this NAAQS (i.e.,
September 15, 2006). Table 1 also shows the regulations which PADEP has
adopted for those source categories, their state effective dates, and
the date and Federal Register (FR) citation of EPA's approval of each
regulation. In addition, Table 1 shows the source categories for which
Pennsylvania has submitted negative declarations as none of these
sources existed in the Commonwealth for those specific categories. In
its 2006 RACT SIP, PADEP has certified that these rules constitute RACT
for the 1997 ozone NAAQS.

                         Table 1-- Pennsylvania RACT Rules for CTG VOC Source Categories
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                           Pennsylvania rule (25 Pa.         State       EPA Approval date & FR
        CTG VOC source category                      Code)              effective date          citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aerospace.............................  Section 129.73 Aerospace               4/10/99  6/25/01, 66 FR 33645.
                                         manufacturing and rework.
Bulk Gasoline Plants..................  Section 129.60 Bulk gasoline            8/3/91  5/13/93, 58 FR 28362.
                                         plants.
                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equipment Leaks from Natural Gas/                                 Negative Declaration.
 Gasoline Processing Plants.
Factory Surface Coating of Flat Wood                              Negative Declaration.
 Paneling.
                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fugitive Emissions from Synthetic       Section 129.71 Synthetic               5/23/92  12/22/94, 59 FR 65971.
 Organic Chemical Polymer and Resin      organic chemical and polymer
 Manufacturing Equipment.                manufacturing--fugitive
                                         sources.
Graphic Arts--Rotogravure and           Section 129.67 Graphic arts             8/3/91  5/13/93, 58 FR 28362.
 Flexography.                            systems.
                                                                              9/5/1998  7/26/2000, 65 FR 45918.
                                                                             6/28/2014  6/25/2015, 80 FR 36481.
                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Large Petroleum Dry Cleaners..........                            Negative declaration.
                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and     Section 129.62 General                 5/23/94  12/22/94, 59 FR 65971.
 Vapor Collection Systems.               standards for bulk gasoline
                                         terminals, bulk gasoline
                                         plants, and small gasoline
                                         storage tanks.
Leaks from Petroleum Refinery           Section 129.58 Petroleum               8/13/83  7/27/84, 49 FR 30183.
 Equipment.                              refineries--fugitive sources.
Manufacture of High-Density             Section 129.71 Synthetic               5/23/92  12/22/94, 59 FR 65971.
 Polyethylene, Polypropylene, and        organic chemical and polymer
 Polystyrene Resins.                     manufacturing--fugitive
                                         sources.
Manufacture of Pneumatic Rubber Tires.  Section 129.69 Manufacture of          5/23/92  12/22/94, 59 FR 65971.
                                         pneumatic rubber tires.
Manufacture of Synthesized              Section 129.68 Manufacture of           8/3/91  5/13/93, 58 FR 28362.
 Pharmaceutical Products.                synthesized pharmaceutical
                                         products.
                                                                                8/11/92, 57 FR 3577.
Petroleum Liquid Storage in External    Section 129.56 Storage tanks            9/5/98  7/26/00, 65 FR 45920.
 Floating Roof Tanks.                    greater than 40,000 gallons
                                         capacity containing VOCs.
Refinery Vacuum Producing Systems,      Section 129.55 Petroleum               6/20/81  1/19/83, 48 FR 2319.
 Wastewater Separators, and Process      refineries--specific sources.
 Unit Turnarounds.
                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOCMI Air Oxidation Processes.........                            Negative declaration.
SOCMI Distillation and Reactor                                    Negative declaration.
 Processes.
Shipbuilding/repair...................                            Negative declaration.
                                       -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Solvent Metal Cleaning................  Section 129.63 Degreasing             12/22/01  1/16/03, 68 FR 2208.
                                         operations.
Stage I Vapor Control Systems--         Section 129.61 Small gasoline           8/3/91  5/13/93, 58 FR 28362.
 Gasoline Service Stations.              storage tank control (Stage I
                                         control).
Storage of Petroleum Liquids in Fixed   Section 129.56 Storage tanks            9/5/98  7/26/00, 65 FR 45920.
 Roof Tanks.                             greater than 40,000 gallons
                                         capacity containing VOCs.
 Surface Coating for            Section 129.52 Surface coating       6/10/2000  7/20/01, 66 FR 37908.
 Insulation of Magnet Wire.              processes.
 Surface Coating of             ..............................        11/20/10  8/24/2011, 76 FR 52870.
 Automobiles and Light-Duty Trucks.
 Surface Coating of Cans......
 Surface Coating of Coils.....
 Surface Coating of Fabrics...
 Surface Coating of Large
 Appliances.
 Surface Coating of Metal
 Furniture.
 Surface Coating of
 Miscellaneous Metal Parts and
 Products.
 Surface Coating of Paper.....
Tank Truck Gasoline Loading Terminals.  Section 129.59 Bulk gasoline            8/3/91  5/13/93, 58 FR 28362.
                                         terminals.
Use of Cutback Asphalt................  Section 129.64 Cutback asphalt         8/13/83  7/27/84, 49 FR 30183.
                                         paving.
Wood Furniture........................  Sections 129.101-107 Wood              6/10/00  7/20/01, 66 FR 37908.
                                         Furniture Manufacturing
                                         Operations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Non-CTG VOC Source Categories
    In its 2006 RACT SIP, PADEP has also certified that three
regulations constitute RACT for certain VOC sources for the 1997 ozone
NAAQS based on the currently available technically and economically
feasible controls. Table 2 lists these source categories, their state
effective dates, and the date and FR citation of EPA's approval of each
regulation.

                            Table 2--Pennsylvania RACT Rules for Non-CTG VOC Sources
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     State
  Pennsylvania non-CTG VOC rule (25 Pa. Code)   effective date           EPA approval date & FR citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 129.65 Ethylene production plants.....          8/1/79  5/20/80, 45 FR 33607.
Section 129.72 Manufacture of surface active           5/23/92  12/22/94, 59 FR 65971.
 agents.
Section 129.75 Mobile equipment repair and            11/27/99  8/14/00, 65 FR 49501.
 refinishing.
Section 129.51 Sources of VOC, General........       4/10/1999  6/25/2001, 66 FR 33645.
(This section lists general requirements for         6/28/2014  6/25/2015, 80 FR 36482.
 all sources of VOCs, and does not include
 RACT controls.).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Final Action

    EPA's review of this material indicates that Pennsylvania's 2006
RACT SIP meets certain RACT requirements for the 1997 ozone NAAQS for
applicable CTG source categories and for three non-CTG VOC categories:
manufacture of surface active agents, mobile equipment repair and
refinishing, and ethylene production plants to address sections 182(b)
and 184(b) of the CAA.
    EPA is approving Pennsylvania's 2006 RACT SIP, which was submitted
on September 25, 2006. This SIP revision consists of (1) Pennsylvania's
certification that previously adopted and SIP approved RACT controls
for CTG source categories and three non-CTG source categories are based
on the currently available technically and economically feasible
controls, and that they continue to represent RACT for the 8-hour
implementation purposes and (2) negative declaration that there are no
sources in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania for five CTG source
categories. EPA finds this 2006 RACT SIP meets requirements for RACT in
CAA section 182(b) and 184(b) with respect to these CTG categories, to
the negative declarations, and to these specific VOC source categories.
Pennsylvania has addressed its remaining obligations to address major
stationary source RACT for VOC and NOX sources in a
subsequent SIP submittal for which EPA will take later, separate
rulemaking action.
    EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because EPA
views this as a noncontroversial amendment and anticipates no adverse
comment. However, in the ``Proposed Rules'' section of today's Federal
Register, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the
proposal to approve the SIP revision if adverse comments are filed.
This rule will be effective on October 5, 2017 without further notice
unless EPA receives adverse comment by August 7, 2017. If EPA receives
adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register informing the public that the rule will not take effect. EPA
will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based on
the proposed rule. EPA will not institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this
time.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. General Requirements

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4);
     does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as specified
by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because the
SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in the state,
and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.

B. Submission to Congress and the Comptroller General

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).

C. Petitions for Judicial Review

    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by September 5, 2017. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it

extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be
filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action.
Parties with objections to this direct final rule are encouraged to
file a comment in response to the parallel notice of proposed
rulemaking for this action published in the proposed rules section of
today's Federal Register, rather than file an immediate petition for
judicial review of this direct final rule, so that EPA can withdraw
this direct final rule and address the comment in the proposed
rulemaking action.
    This action approving Pennsylvania's 2006 RACT SIP may not be
challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See
section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: June 22, 2017.
Cecil Rodrigues,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart NN--Pennsylvania

0
2. In Sec.  52.2020, the table in paragraph (e)(1) is amended by adding
an entry for ``Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) for the
1997 ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS)'' at the end
of the table to read as follows:

52.2020   Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (e) * * *
    (1) * * *

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Name of non-regulatory SIP      Applicable geographic       State
             revision                        area          submittal date             EPA approval date                    Additional explanation
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                      * * * * * * *
Reasonably Available Control        Statewide............       9/25/2006  7/7/2017,  [Insert Federal Register     Pertaining only to control technique
 Technology (RACT) for the 1997                                             citation].                              guideline (CTG) source categories
 ozone national ambient air                                                                                and three non-CTG volatile organic
 quality standard (NAAQS).                                                                                compound (VOC) source categories:
                                                                                Manufacture of surface active
                                                                                agents, mobile equipment repair and
                                                                                refinishing, and ethylene production
                                                                                plants. Remainder of submittal
                                                                                withdrawn 6/27/2016.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2017-14204 Filed 7-6-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 7 (Wednesday, January 11, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3307-3308]
[FR Doc No: 2017-00393]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR13-14-002]

Western Refining Pipeline Company; Notice for Temporary Waiver of
Filing and Reporting Requirements

    On December 16, 2016, Western Refining Pipeline Company (Western)
filed a Request to Amend previously granted waiver of Interstate
Commerce Act tariff and reporting requirements and Commission's related
implementing regulations.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in this proceeding
must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.  385.214) on
or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date.
Protests will be considered by the Commission in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to make protestants
parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to intervene or
protest must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. In
reference to filings initiating a new proceeding, interventions or
protests submitted on or before the comment deadline need not be served
on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.

    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with
any FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on January 19, 2017.

    Dated: January 5, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-00393 Filed 1-10-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


% Food exposure
% Once daily oral exposure, dose from cpfs SS F13_49 foodonly exp distribution.csv 97.5th percentile
% Female adult, Body weight set to 72.9 kg
% Cecilia Tan
% August 26, 2015

prepare @clear @all
% Setting model parameters
start @NoCallback
use human_parameters_MRP
use preg_female_parameters

BWSW=1;		% Set to 1 if BWT is provided
BWST=72.9;	% Initial BW in kg
PREG=0;			% Not pregnant
TSTOP= 1008; 	% Exposure duration in hrs

%Single daily oral exposure
DT = xlsRead("Food.xls", "975p", "A1:A43"); % Dosing Times
DORAL=xlsRead("Food.xls", "975p", "B1:B43"); % Dose in ug/kg
prepare time rbcce cv urinetcpy
start@nocallback

mytable = [_time _rbcce _urinetcpy _cv*350.6]; %unit of conc = ug/L
save mytable @file='food_975.txt' @format=ascii

min(_rbcce)		% display peak RBC AChE inhibition


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 81 (Thursday, April 29, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22610-22612]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08875]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2021-0170]
RIN 1625-AA00

Safety Zone; Sabine River, Orange, TX

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain navigable waters of the Sabine River, extending the entire
width of the river, adjacent to the public boat ramp located in Orange,
TX. The safety zone is necessary to protect persons and vessels from
hazards associated with a high-speed boat race competition in Orange,
TX. This regulation prohibits persons and vessels from being in the
safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Marine Safety
Unit Port Arthur or a designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 a.m. through 6 p.m. on May 22,
2021 and May 23, 2021.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2021-0170 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Mr. Scott Whalen, Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On March 18, 2021, the City of Orange, TX notified the Coast Guard
that it will be sponsoring high speed boat races from 8:30 a.m. to 6
p.m. on May 22 and 23, 2021, adjacent to the public boat ramp in
Orange, TX. The Captain of the Port Port Arthur (COTP) has determined
that potential hazards associated with high speed boat races would be a
safety concern for spectator craft and vessels in the vicinity of these
race events. In response, on April 6, 2021, the Coast Guard published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) titled ``Safety Zone; Sabine
River, Orange, TX'' (86 FR 17755). There we stated why we issued the
NPRM, and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to
this fireworks display. During the comment period that ended April 21,
we received no comments.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because immediate action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with hazards
associated with high speed boat races.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port Port Arthur
(COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with high speed
boat races will be a safety concern for spectator craft and vessels in
the vicinity of these race events. The purpose of this rule is to
ensure safety of vessels and the navigable waters in the safety zone
before, during, and after the scheduled event.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM published April
6, 2021. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from
the proposed rule in the NPRM.
    This rule establishes a safety zone from 8:30 a.m. to 6 p.m. on May
22 and 23, 2021. The safety zone will cover all navigable waters of the
Sabine River, extending the entire width of the river, adjacent to the
public boat ramp located in Orange, TX bounded to the north by the
Orange Public Wharf and latitude 30[deg]05'50'' N and to the south at
latitude 30[deg]05'33'' N. The duration of the safety zone is intended
to protect participants, spectators, and other persons and vessels, in
the navigable waters of the Sabine River during high-speed boat races
and will include breaks and opportunity for vessels to transit through
the regulated area. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits.

This rule has not been designated a ``significant regulatory action,''
under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the proposed size,
location and duration of the rule. The safety zone will encompass a
less than half-mile stretch of the Sabine River for eight hours on each
of two days. The Coast Guard will notify the public by issuing Local
Notice to Mariners (LNM), and/or Marine Safety Information Bulletin
(MSIB) and Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM radio and the rule
will allow vessels to seek permission to enter the zone during
scheduled breaks.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone that would last 8 hours on each of two days and that would
prohibit entry on less than a half-mile stretch of the Sabine River in
Orange, TX. It is categorically excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-
01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Memorandum for Record supporting this
determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating
the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREA AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. Add Sec.  165.T08-0170 to read as follows:

Sec.  165.T08-0170  Safety Zone; Sabine River, Orange, TX.

    (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: all navigable
waters of the Sabine River, extending the entire width of the river,
adjacent to the public boat ramp located in Orange, TX bounded to the
north by the Orange Public Wharf and latitude 30[deg]05'50'' N and to
the south at latitude 30[deg]05'33'' N. The duration of the safety zone
is intended to protect participants, spectators, and other persons and
vessels, in the navigable waters of the Sabine River during high-speed
boat races and will include breaks and opportunity for vessels to
transit through the regulated area.

    (b) Effective period. This section is effective from 10 a.m.
through 6 p.m. on May 22, 2021 and May 23, 2021.
    (c) Enforcement periods. This section will be enforced from 10 a.m.
through 6 p.m. daily.
    (d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec.  165.23, entry of vessels or persons into this zone is prohibited
unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit Port
Arthur (COTP) or a designated representative. They may be contacted on
VHF-FM channel 13 or 16, or by phone at by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (2) The COTP or a designated representative may forbid and control
the movement of all vessels in the regulated area. When hailed or
signaled by an official patrol vessel, a vessel shall come to an
immediate stop and comply with the directions given. Failure to do so
may result in expulsion from the area, citation for failure to comply,
or both.
    (3) The COTP or a designated representative may terminate the event
or the operation of any vessel at any time it is deemed necessary for
the protection of life or property.
    (4) The COTP or a designated representative will terminate
enforcement of the special local regulations at the conclusion of the
event.
    (e) Informational broadcasts. The COTP or a designated
representative will inform the public of the effective period for the
safety zone as well as any changes in the dates and times of
enforcement through Local Notice to Mariners (LNMs), Broadcast Notices
to Mariners (BNMs), and/or Marine Safety Information Bulletins (MSIBs)
as appropriate.

    Dated: April 22, 2021.
Molly A. Wike,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Marine Safety Zone Port
Arthur.
[FR Doc. 2021-08875 Filed 4-28-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


                            Earthjustice and US EPA                                     Meeting                                  May 17, 2012

A meeting was held today to discuss general issues surrounding the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for the Portland Cement Manufacturing Industry and Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants, Reconsideration Notice.

Attendees:

Jim Pew and clients, Earthjustice

US EPA:

By teleconference:

Sharon Nizich Keith Barnett Steve Fruh Peter Tsirigotis Steve Page

In person: Don Zinger Gina McCarthy Janet McCabe