[Federal Register: April 9, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 68)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18084-18086]
[DOCID:fr09ap10-18]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

44 CFR Part 65

[Docket ID FEMA-2010-0003; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-1088]

Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Interim rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This interim rule lists communities where modification of the
Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) is appropriate because
of new scientific or technical data. New flood insurance premium rates
will be calculated from the modified BFEs for new buildings and their
contents.

DATES: These modified BFEs are currently in effect on the dates listed
in the table below and revise the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) in
effect prior to this determination for the listed communities.
    From the date of the second publication of these changes in a
newspaper of local circulation, any person has ninety (90) days in
which to request through the community that the Deputy Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administrator reconsider the changes. The
modified BFEs may be changed during the 90-day period.

ADDRESSES: The modified BFEs for each community are available for
inspection at the office of the Chief Executive Officer of each
community. The respective addresses are listed in the table below.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kevin C. Long, Acting Chief,
Engineering Management Branch, Mitigation Directorate, Federal
Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,
(202) 646-2820, or (e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The modified BFEs are not listed for each
community in this interim rule. However, the address of the Chief
Executive Officer of the community where the modified BFE
determinations are available for inspection is provided.
    Any request for reconsideration must be based on knowledge of
changed conditions or new scientific or technical data.
    The modifications are made pursuant to section 201 of the Flood
Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C. 4105, and are in accordance
with the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
and with 44 CFR part 65.
    For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is
shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals.
    The modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management
measures that the community is required either to adopt or to show
evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or to remain
qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
    These modified BFEs, together with the floodplain management
criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum that are required.
They should not be construed to mean that the community must change any
existing ordinances that are more stringent in their floodplain
management requirements. The community may at any time enact stricter
requirements of its own or pursuant to policies established by other
Federal, State, or regional entities. The changes in BFEs are in
accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    National Environmental Policy Act. This interim rule is
categorically excluded from the requirements of 44 CFR part 10,
Environmental Consideration. An environmental impact assessment has not
been prepared.
    Regulatory Flexibility Act. As flood elevation determinations are
not within the scope of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612, a regulatory flexibility analysis is not required.
    Regulatory Classification. This interim rule is not a significant
regulatory action under the criteria of section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 of September 30, 1993, Regulatory Planning and Review, 58 FR
51735.
    Executive Order 13132, Federalism. This interim rule involves no
policies that have federalism implications under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism.
    Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform. This interim rule
meets the applicable standards of Executive Order 12988.

List of Subjects in 44 CFR Part 65

    Flood insurance, Floodplains, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

0
Accordingly, 44 CFR part 65 is amended to read as follows:

PART 65--[AMENDED]

0
1. The authority citation for part 65 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.

Sec.  65.4  [Amended]

0
2. The tables published under the authority of Sec.  65.4 are amended
as follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Date and name of
         State and county             Location and  case     newspaper  where     Chief executive  officer  Effective date of  modification   Community
                                             No.           notice was published         of community                                             No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arizona:
    Cochise.......................  Unincorporated areas   October 12, 2009;     The Honorable Richard      February 16, 2010..............       040012
                                     of Cochise County      October 19, 2009;     Searle, Vice Chairman,
                                     (09-09-2171P).         Sierra Vista Herald.  Cochise County Board of
                                                                                Supervisors, 1415 West
                                                                                Melody Lane, Building G,
                                                                                Bisbee, AZ 85603.
    Maricopa......................  City of El Mirage (09- October 29, 2009;     The Honorable Fred         October 22, 2009...............       040041
                                     09-1385P).             November 5, 2009;     Waterman, Mayor, City of
                                                            Arizona Business      El Mirage, P.O. Box 26,
                                                            Gazette.              El Mirage, AZ 85335.
    Maricopa......................  Unincorporated areas   October 29, 2009;     The Honorable Andrew W.    October 22, 2009...............       040037
                                     of Maricopa County     November 5, 2009;     Kunasek, Chairman,
                                     (09-09-1385P).         Arizona Business      Maricopa County Board of
                                                            Gazette.              Supervisors, 301 West
                                                                                Jefferson Street, 10th
                                                                                Floor, Phoenix, AZ 85003.
    Maricopa......................  City of Surprise (09-  October 29, 2009;     The Honorable Lyn Truitt,  October 22, 2009...............       040053
                                     09-1385P).             November 5, 2009;     Mayor, City of Surprise,
                                                            Arizona Business      12425 West Bell Road,
                                                            Gazette.              Surprise, AZ 85374.
    Yavapai.......................  Town of Prescott       November 2, 2009;     The Honorable Harvey       March 9, 2010..................       040121
                                     Valley (09-09-1988P).  November 9, 2009;     Skoog, Town of Prescott
                                                            Prescott Daily        Valley, 7501 East Civic
                                                            Courier.              Circle, Prescott Valley,
                                                                                AZ 86314.
California:
    Alameda.......................  City of Fremont (09-   October 12, 2009;     The Honorable Robert       February 16, 2010..............       065028
                                     09-0112P).             October 19, 2009;     Wasserman, Mayor, City
                                                            The Argus.            of Freemont, 3300
                                                                                Capitol Avenue, Fremont,
                                                                                CA 94538.
    San Diego.....................  City of Chula Vista    October 16, 2009;     The Honorable Cheryl Cox,  November 2, 2009...............       065021
                                     (09-09-0757P).         October 23, 2009;     Mayor, City of Chula
                                                            The Star News.        Vista, 276 4th Avenue,
                                                                                Chula Vista, CA 91910.
    San Diego.....................  City of San Marcos     October 16, 2009;     The Honorable James        February 20, 2010..............       060296
                                     (08-09-1888P).         October 23, 2009;     Desmond, Mayor, City of
                                                            North County Times.   San Marcos, One Civic
                                                                                Drive, San Marcos, CA
                                                                                92069.
Colorado:
    Larimer.......................  City of Fort Collins   October 16, 2009;     The Honorable Darin        February 22, 2010..............       080102
                                     (08-08-0893P).         October 23, 2009;     Atteberry, Manager, City
                                                            Fort Collins          of Fort Collins, 300
                                                            Coloradoan.           LaPorte Avenue, Fort
                                                                                Collins, CO 80521.
    Larimer.......................  Unincorporated areas   October 16, 2009;     The Honorable Frank        February 22, 2010..............       080101
                                     of Larimer County      October 23, 2009;     Lancaster, Manager,
                                     (08-08-0893P).         Fort Collins          Larimer County, P.O. Box
                                                            Coloradoan.           1190, Fort Collins, CO
                                                                                80522.
    Mesa..........................  Unincorporated areas   October 16, 2009;     Mr. Steven Acquafresca,    March 2, 2010..................       080115
                                     of Mesa County (09-    October 23, 2009;     Chairman, Mesa County
                                     08-0604P).             Daily Sentinel.       Board of Commissioners,
                                                                                P.O. Box 20000, Grand
                                                                                Junction, CO 81502.
Connecticut:
    Middlesex.....................  Town of Cromwell (09-  July 13, 2009; July   The Honorable John M.      June 30, 2009..................       090123
                                     01-0957P).             20, 2009;             Flanders, First
                                                            Middletown Press.     Selectman, Town of
                                                                                Cromwell, 41 West
                                                                                Street, Cromwell, CT
                                                                                06416.
    New Haven.....................  Town of Cheshire (09-  October 15, 2009;     The Honorable Matt Hall,   February 19, 2010..............       090074
                                     01-1101P).             October 22, 2009;     Chairman, Cheshire Town
                                                            Cheshire Herald.      Council, 84 South Main
                                                                                Street, Cheshire, CT
                                                                                06410.
Florida: Duval....................  City of Jacksonville   October 13, 2009;     The Honorable John         November 9, 2009...............        20077
                                     (09-04-2297P).         October 20, 2009;     Peyton, Mayor, City of
                                                            Jacksonville Daily    Jacksonville, 117 West
                                                            Record.               Duval Street, 4th Floor,
                                                                                Jacksonville, FL 32202.
Georgia: Newton...................  City of Covington (09- October 9, 2009;      Ms. Kim Carter, Mayor,     February 15, 2010..............       130144
                                     04-4700P).             October 16, 2009;     City of Covington, 2194
                                                            The Covington News.   Emory Street, Covington,
                                                                                GA 30014.
Hawaii: Hawaii....................  Unincorporated areas   October 12, 2009;     The Honorable William P.   February 16, 2010..............       155166
                                     of Hawaii County (09-  October 19, 2009;     Kenoi, Mayor, Hawaii
                                     09-1608P).             Hawaii Tribune-       County, 25 Aupuni
                                                            Herald.               Street, Hilo, HI 96720.
Illinois:
    Will..........................  City of Joliet (09-05- October 30, 2009;     The Honorable Arthur       October 21, 2009...............       170702
                                     0265P).                November 6, 2009;     Schultz, Mayor, City of
                                                            Herald News.          Joliet, 150 West
                                                                                Jefferson Street,
                                                                                Joliet, IL 60432.
    Will..........................  Unincorporated areas   October 30, 2009;     The Honorable Lawrence M.  October 21, 2009...............       170695
                                     of Will County (09-    November 6, 2009;     Walsh, Will County
                                     05-0265P).             Herald News.          Executive, 302 North
                                                                                Chicago Street, Joliet,
                                                                                IL 60432.
Kentucky: Fayette.................  Lexington-Fayette      October 7, 2009;      The Honorable Jim          September 28, 2009.............       210067
                                     Urban County           October 14, 2009;     Newberry, Mayor,
                                     Government (09-04-     Lexington Herald-     Lexington-Fayette Urban
                                     1695P).                Leader.               County Government, 200
                                                                                East Main Street, 12th
                                                                                Floor, Lexington, KY
                                                                                40507.
North Carolina: Cumberland........  Unincorporated Areas   October 7, 2009;      Mr. James E. Martin,       February 11, 2010..............       370076
                                     of, Cumberland         October 14, 2009;     County Manager,
                                     County (09-04-3582P).  Fayetteville          Cumberland County, 117
                                                            Observer.             Dick Street, Room 512,
                                                                                Fayetteville, NC 28301.
Texas:

    Johnson.......................  City of Burleson (09-  October 7, 2009;      The Honorable Kenneth      February 11, 2010..............       485459
                                     06-0485P).             October 14, 2009;     Shetter, Mayor, City of
                                                            Burleson Star.        Burleson, 141 West
                                                                                Renfro Street, Burleson,
                                                                                TX 76028.
    Travis........................  City of Austin (09-06- October 27, 2009;     The Honorable Lee          March 3, 2010..................       480624
                                     0763P).                November 3, 2009;     Leffingwell, Mayor, City
                                                            Austin American       of Austin, P.O. Box
                                                            Statesman.            1088, Austin, TX 78767.
    Travis........................  City of Austin (09-06- November 4, 2009;     The Honorable Lee          March 11, 2010.................       480624
                                     0764P).                November 11, 2009;    Leffingwell, Mayor, City
                                                            Austin American       of Austin, P.O. Box
                                                            Statesman.            1088, Austin, TX 78767.
Virginia: Prince William..........  Unincorporated areas   October 28, 2009;     The Honorable Corey        March 4, 2010..................       510119
                                     of Prince William      November 4, 2009;     Stewart, Chairman,
                                     County (09-03-1773P).  News & Messenger.     Prince William County
                                                                                Board of Supervisors,
                                                                                One County Complex
                                                                                Court, Prince William,
                                                                                VA 22192.
Washington:
    King..........................  City of Redmond (08-   October 30, 2009;     The Honorable John         March 8, 2010..................       530087
                                     10-0762P).             November 6, 2009;     Marchione, Mayor, City
                                                            Redmond Reporter.     of Redmond, P.O. Box
                                                                                97010, Redmond, WA 98073.
    Spokane.......................  City of Cheney (09-10- October 16, 2009;     The Honorable Allan        April 7, 2010..................       530175
                                     0216P).                October 23, 2009;     Gainer, Mayor, City of
                                                            Spokesman Review.     Cheney, 609 2nd Street,
                                                                                Cheney, WA 99004.
    Spokane.......................  Unincorporated areas   October 16, 2009;     The Honorable Todd         April 7, 2010..................       530174
                                     of Spokane County      October 23, 2009;     Mielke, Chairman,
                                     (09-10-0216P).         Spokesman Review.     Spokane County Board of
                                                                                Commissioners, 1116 West
                                                                                Broadway Avenue,
                                                                                Spokane, WA 99260.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: March 18, 2010.
Edward L. Connor,
Acting Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administrator, Mitigation,
Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-8078 Filed 4-8-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 3, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52174-52177]
[FR Doc No: 2014-20259]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0137; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-135-AD;
Amendment 39-17960; AD 2014-17-07]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Model A300 series airplanes; Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-
600R series airplanes; Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes
(collectively called Model A300-600 series airplanes); and Model A310
series airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of rupture of the
uplock springs of the nose landing gear (NLG) and main landing gear
(MLG) doors and legs. This AD requires repetitive inspections of the
uplock springs of the NLG and MLG doors and legs for broken and damaged
springs, and corrective actions if necessary. We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct improper free fall extension of the MLG or NLG,
which could lead to possible loss of control of the airplane on the
ground, and consequent damage to the airplane and injury to occupants.

DATES: This AD becomes effective October 8, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of October 8,
2014.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0137; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus SAS,
Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac
Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com.
You may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to all Airbus Model A300
series airplanes; Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series
airplanes; Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called
Model A300-600 series airplanes); and Model A310 series airplanes. The
NPRM published in the Federal Register on March 7, 2014 (79 FR 13003).
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2013-0150, dated July 16, 2013 (referred to
after this as the Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or
``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for all Airbus Model A300
series airplanes; Model A300 B4-600, B4-600R, and F4-600R series
airplanes; Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes (collectively called
Model A300-600 series airplanes); and Model A310 series airplanes. The
MCAI states:

Some cases of Nose Landing Gear (NLG) and Main Landing Gear (MLG)
Door and Leg Uplock spring ruptures on A300, A310 or A300-600
aeroplanes have been reported in service.
    Springs within the uplock are used to either lock the gear or
the door in the up position, or to participate in emergency
mechanical unlocking.
    The springs are positioned in pairs, and in case of rupture of
one spring the other one remains to fulfill the function, whereas
the rupture of both springs will disable the locking function or the
emergency unlocking function.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could prevent
proper free fall extension of the MLG or NLG, possibly leading to
loss of control of the aeroplane on the ground, consequently
resulting in damage to the aeroplane and injury to occupants.
    For the reason described above, this [EASA] AD requires
[repetitive] detailed visual inspection[s] of the NLG and MLG Door
and Leg Uplock springs [for broken and damaged springs] and,
depending of findings, their replacement.

    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0137-0002.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (79 FR 13003, March 7,
2014) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

 ``Contacting the Manufacturer'' Paragraph in This AD

    Since late 2006, we have included a standard paragraph titled
``Airworthy Product'' in all MCAI ADs in which the FAA develops an AD
based on a foreign authority's AD.
    We have become aware that some operators have misunderstood or
misinterpreted the Airworthy Product paragraph to allow the owner/
operator to use messages provided by the manufacturer as approval of
deviations during the accomplishment of an AD-mandated action. The
Airworthy Product paragraph does not approve messages or other
information provided by the manufacturer for deviations to the
requirements of the AD-mandated actions. The Airworthy Product
paragraph only addresses the requirement to contact the manufacturer
for corrective actions for the identified unsafe condition and does not
cover deviations from other AD requirements. However, deviations to AD-
required actions are addressed in 14 CFR 39.17, and anyone may request
the approval for an alternative method of compliance to the AD-required
actions using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    To address this misunderstanding and misinterpretation of the
Airworthy Product paragraph, we have changed the paragraph and retitled
it ``Contacting the Manufacturer.'' This paragraph now clarifies that
for any requirement in this AD to obtain corrective actions from a
manufacturer, the actions must be accomplished using a method approved
by the FAA, the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), or Airbus's
EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA).
    The Contacting the Manufacturer paragraph also clarifies that, if
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature. The DOA signature indicates that the data and information
contained in the document are EASA-approved, which is also FAA-
approved. Messages and other information provided by the manufacturer
that do not contain the DOA-authorized signature approval are not EASA-
approved, unless EASA directly approves the manufacturer's message or
other information.
    This clarification does not remove flexibility previously afforded
by the Airworthy Product paragraph. Consistent with long-standing FAA
policy, such flexibility was never intended for required actions. This
is also consistent with the recommendation of the Airworthiness
Directive Implementation Aviation Rulemaking Committee to increase
flexibility in complying with ADs by identifying those actions in
manufacturers' service instructions that are ``Required for
Compliance'' with ADs. We continue to work with manufacturers to
implement this

recommendation. But once we determine that an action is required, any
deviation from the requirement must be approved as an alternative
method of compliance.
    We also have decided not to include a generic reference to either
the ``delegated agent'' or ``design approval holder (DAH) with State of
Design Authority design organization approval,'' but instead we have
provided the specific delegation approval granted by the State of
Design Authority for the DAH throughout this AD.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD with the changes described
previously and minor editorial changes. We have determined that these
minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 13003, March 7, 2014) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 13003, March 7, 2014).
    We also determined that these changes will not increase the
economic burden on any operator or increase the scope of this AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 156 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                     Labor cost           Parts cost     Cost per product       operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repetitive inspections.........  1 work-hour x $85 per                $0   $85 per inspection  $13,260 per
                                  hour = $85 per                                                inspection.
                                  inspection.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, we estimate that any necessary replacement would take
about 9 work-hours for a cost of $765 per product. The cost of parts is
minimal. We have no way of determining the number of aircraft that
might need this action.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0137; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2014-17-07 Airbus: Amendment 39-17960. Docket No. FAA-2014-0137;
Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-135-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective October 8, 2014.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to the Airbus airplanes specified in paragraphs
(c)(1), (c)(2), (c)(3), (c)(4), (c)(5), and (c)(6) of this AD;
certificated in any category; all serial numbers.
    (1) Model A300 B2-1A, B2-1C, B2K-3C, B2-203, B4-2C, B4-103, and
B4-203 airplanes.
    (2) Model A300 B4-601, B4-603, B4-620, and B4-622 airplanes.
    (3) Model A300 B4-605R and B4-622R airplanes.
    (4) Model A300 F4-605R and F4-622R airplanes.
    (5) Model A300 C4-605R Variant F airplanes.
    (6) Model A310-203, -204, -221, -222, -304, -322, -324, and -325
airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
Gear.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of rupture of the uplock springs
of the nose landing gear (NLG) and main landing gear (MLG) doors and
legs. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct improper free
fall extension of the MLG or NLG, which could lead to possible loss
of control of the airplane on the ground, and consequent damage to
the airplane and injury to occupants.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Repetitive Inspections

    Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD: Perform a
detailed inspection of the uplock springs of the MLG and NLG legs
and doors for broken and damaged springs, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service information
identified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD. Repeat
the inspection thereafter at intervals not to exceed 18 months.
    (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-32-0465, Revision 01, dated
April 25, 2013 (for Model A300 series airplanes).
    (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-32-6111, Revision 01, dated
April 25, 2013 (for Model A300-600 series airplanes).
    (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A310-32-2147, Revision 01, dated
April 25, 2013 (for Model A310 series airplanes).

(h) Corrective Actions

    The corrective actions required by paragraphs (h)(1), (h)(2),
and (h)(3) of this AD do not constitute terminating actions for the
repetitive inspections required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (1) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, one spring on the MLG or NLG door uplock is found broken or
damaged, within 2 months after the inspection, replace the affected
MLG or NLG door uplock, as applicable, with a serviceable part, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
service bulletin identified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3)
of this AD.
    (2) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, one spring on the MLG or NLG leg uplock is found broken or
damaged, repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 50 flight cycles. Replacement
of any affected leg uplock, as required by paragraph (h)(2)(i) or
(h)(2)(ii) of this AD, as applicable, constitutes terminating action
for the repetitive inspections required by paragraph (h)(2) of this
AD.
    (i) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (h)(2) of
this AD, the second free fall spring on the MLG or NLG leg uplock is
found broken or damaged, before further flight, replace the affected
MLG or NLG leg uplock, as applicable, with a serviceable part, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
service bulletin identified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3)
of this AD.
    (ii) Within 1,000 flight cycles after doing the inspection
required by paragraph (g) of this AD during which the spring has
been found broken, replace the affected MLG or NLG leg uplock, as
applicable, with a serviceable part, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable service bulletin
identified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3) of this AD.
    (3) If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g) of this
AD, two free fall springs on the same MLG or NLG leg uplock are
found broken or damaged, before further flight, replace the affected
MLG or NLG leg uplock, as applicable, with a serviceable part, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of the applicable
service bulletin identified in paragraph (g)(1), (g)(2), or (g)(3)
of this AD.

(i) Credit for Previous Actions

    This paragraph provides credit for the applicable actions
required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if those actions were
performed before the effective date of this AD using the applicable
service information identified in paragraph (i)(1), (i)(2), or
(i)(3) of this AD.
    (1) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-32-0465, dated July 20, 2012,
which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (2) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-32-6111, dated July 20, 2012,
which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.
    (3) Airbus Service Bulletin A310-32-2147, dated July 20, 2012,
which is not incorporated by reference in this AD.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using
the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR
39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch, ANM-116, Transport
Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057-
3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Information may be
emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding district office. The
AMOC approval letter must specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA; or the
European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA); or Airbus's EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(k) Related Information

    (1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) EASA Airworthiness Directive 2013-0150, dated July 16, 2013,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-
2014-0137-0002.
    (2) Service information identified in this AD that is not
incorporated by reference may be viewed at the addresses specified
in paragraphs (l)(3) and (l)(4) of this AD.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-32-0465, Revision 01, dated
April 25, 2013.
    (ii) Airbus Service Bulletin A300-32-6111, Revision 01, dated
April 25, 2013.
    (iii) Airbus Service Bulletin A310-32-2147, Revision 01, dated
April 25, 2013.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EAW, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96;
fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.airbus.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 15, 2014.
Michael Kaszycki,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-20259 Filed 9-2-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 183 (Thursday, September 20, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 58371]
[FR Doc No: 2012-23228]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 3021-088]

Allegheny Hydro No. 8, L.P., Allegheny Hydro No. 9, L.P., and
U.S. Bank National Association Allegheny Hydro, LLC; Notice of
Application for Transfer of License, and Soliciting Comments and
Motions To Intervene

    On August 31, 2012, Allegheny Hydro No. 8, L.P., Allegheny Hydro
No. 9, L.P., and U.S. Bank National Association (in its capacity as
owner trustee) (co-licensees) and Allegheny Hydro, LLC (transferee)
filed an application for transfer of license for the Allegheny River
Lock and Dam Nos. 8 and 9 Hydroelectric Project No. 3021, located at
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Allegheny River Lock and Dam No. 8
and Allegheny River Lock and Dam No. 9 on the Allegheny River in
Armstrong County, Pennsylvania.
    Applicants seek Commission approval to transfer the license for the
Allegheny River Lock and Dam Nos. 8 and 9 Hydroelectric Project from
Allegheny Hydro No. 8, L.P., Allegheny Hydro No. 9, L.P., and the U.S.
Bank National Association as co-licensees to Allegheny Hydro, LLC as
sole licensee.
    Applicants' Contact: Mr. Curt Whittaker, Rath, Young and
Pignatelli, P.C., One Capital Plaza, Concord, NH 03302, phone: (603)
226-2600 and Mr. Mark C. Williams, Bingham McCutchen LLP, 2020 K Street
NW., Suite 1100, Washington, DC 20006, phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Deadline for filing comments and motions to intervene: 15 days from
the issuance date of this notice. Comments and motions to intervene may
be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site under http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit brief
comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration, using the
eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You
must include your name and contact information at the end of your
comments. If unable to be filed electronically, documents may be paper-
filed. To paper-file, an original plus seven copies should be mailed
to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426. More information about this
project can be viewed or printed on the eLibrary link of Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the
docket number (P-3021) in the docket number field to access the
document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

    Dated: September 13, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-23228 Filed 9-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: May 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 87)]
[Notices]
[Page 24942]
[DOCID:fr06my10-54]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13709-000]

Osprey I, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application Accepted
for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Competing
Applications

April 29, 2010.
    On April 9, 2010, Osprey I, LLC filed an application, pursuant to
section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act, proposing to study the
feasibility of the New Mills Dam Hydroelectric Project (New Mills Dam),
to be located on the Cobbossecontee River in the Town of Gardiner,
Kennebec County, Maine.
    The proposed project would consist of: (1) An existing 12-foot-
high, 91-foot-wide concrete dam with a 58-foot-wide spillway; (2) an
existing 140-acre reservoir; (3) an existing powerhouse, penstock, and
outlet structure; (4) new turbine generator units with a total
installed capacity of 250 kilowatts (kW); (5) a new transmission line
connecting to an existing Central Maine Power distribution line located
3,000 feet downstream of the dam; and (6) appurtenant facilities. The
project would produce an estimated average annual generation of about
1,300 megawatt-hours, which would be sold directly to a local utility.
    Applicant Contact: Mr. Hoon Won, 275 River Road, P.O. Box 202,
Woolwich, Maine 04579,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: John Ramer,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp. More information about this project can be viewed or
printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of Commission's Web site at http://
www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp. Enter the docket number (P-
13709) in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-10639 Filed 5-5-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 214 (Wednesday, November 5, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 65749-65751]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26347]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73488; File No. SR-C2-2014-020]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to the Automatic Handling Process in No-Bid Series

October 31, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 22, 2014, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its rules regarding its automatic
order handling process. The text of the proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its rules regarding its automatic
order handling process. The proposed rule change seeks to modify
subparagraph (h) to Rule 6.12, which sets forth how the C2 System (the
``System'') \3\ handles market orders to sell in option series for
which the national best bid in the series is zero (``no-bid
series'').\4\ Currently, if the System receives during the trading day
or has resting in the electronic book (the ``Book'') \5\ after the
opening of trading a market order to sell in a no-bid series, it
handles the order as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The System is the automated trading system used by the
Exchange for the trading of options contracts.
    \4\ The Exchange notes that, for singly listed series, the
national best bid is equivalent to the Exchange's best bid and the
national best offer is equivalent to the Exchange's best offer.
    \5\ For example, the Exchange receives a market order to sell
prior to the opening of a series and the series opens with a sell
market order imbalance pursuant to Rule 6.11(e)(4). When the series
opens the market order to sell, which was resting in the book prior
to the opening of the series, will be routed according to the no-bid
procedures in Rule 6.12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     If the Exchange best offer in that series is less than or
equal to $0.30, then the System will consider, for the remainder of the
trading day, the market order as a limit order to sell with a limit
price equal to the minimum trading increment applicable to the series
and enter the order into the Book behind limit orders to sell at the
minimum increment that are already resting in the Book.
     If the Exchange best offer in that series is greater than
$0.30, then the market order will be cancelled.
    Based on experience since the implementation of this parameter, the
Exchange now proposes to change the parameter from $0.30 to $0.50. The
Exchange believes that the automatic handling of market orders to sell
in no-bid series if the Exchange best offer is less than or equal to
$0.50 would reduce the number of orders that are automatically
cancelled. Additionally, the $0.50 threshold serves as a protection
feature for investors in certain situations, such as when a series is
no-bid because the last bid traded just prior to the entry of the
market order to sell. The purpose of this threshold is to limit the
automatic booking of market orders to sell at minimum increments to
only those for true zero-bid options, as options in no-bid series with
an offer of more than $0.50 are less likely to be worthless.
    For example, if the CBOE Hybrid System receives a market order to
sell in a no-bid series with a minimum increment of $0.01 and the
Exchange best offer is $0.01, the System will consider, for the
remainder of the trading day, the order as a limit order with a price
of $0.01 and submit it to the Book behind other limit orders to sell at
the minimum increment that are already resting in the Book. At that
point, even if the series is no-bid because, for example, the last bid
just traded and the limit order trades at $0.01, the next bid entered
after the trade would not be higher than $0.01.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ If the order does not execute during the trading day as a
limit order and remains outstanding after the close of trading
(i.e., a GTC order), the System at that time will no longer consider
the order as a limit order and will again handle the order as a
market order to sell after the close of trading. The market order
will stay on the Book until the opening of the next trading day (or
until cancelled), at which point it may execute during the open or,
if it remains unexecuted after the opening of trading, it will
either execute with the best bid at the time or, if the series is
still no-bid, again be handled pursuant to proposed Rule 6.12(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    However, if the System receives a market order to sell in a no-bid
series with a minimum increment of $0.01 and the Exchange best offer is
$1.20 (because, for example, the last bid of $1.00 just traded and a
new bid has not yet populated the Exchange's quote), the System will
instead cancel the order. It would be unfair to the entering firm to
let its market order trade as a limit order for $0.01 because, for
example, the firm submitted the order during the brief time when there
were no disseminated bids in a series trading significantly higher than
the minimum increment.
    The Exchange believes the threshold of $0.50 is reasonable. The
Exchange notes that this threshold is less than the current acceptable
price range (``APR'') parameter for series with a bid price of less
than $100.00.\7\ Pursuant to the price check provision in Rule 6.17 \8\
the

System will not automatically execute a marketable order if the width
between the national best bid and national best offer is not within the
APR, which the Exchange has currently set at $10.00 for any bid price
between $0.00 and $100. Instead, the System will cancel the order.
Notwithstanding this provision, proposed Rule 6.12(h), as amended,
would allow for the potential execution of market orders to sell in no-
bid series with offers less than $0.50 as limit orders at the price of
a minimum increment. If the threshold in proposed Rule 6.12(h) were
higher, the risk of having a market order trade at a minimum increment
in a series that is not truly no-bid would increase.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The acceptable APR parameter is determined by the Exchange
on a class-by-class basis. See Rule 6.17 and C2 Regulatory Circular
RG14-020 (Operational System Settings--APR and OEPW).
    \8\ Rule 6.17 also provides that the System will not
automatically execute eligible orders that are marketable if the
execution would follow an initial partial execution on the Exchange
and would be at a subsequent price that is not within an acceptable
tick distance from the initial execution. The APR for purposes of
Rule 6.17 is determined by the Exchange on a class-by-class basis
and may not be less than $0.375 between the bid and offer for each
option contract for which the bid is less than $2, $0.60 where the
bid is at least $2 but does not exceed $5, $0.75 where the bid is
more than $5 but does not exceed $10, $1.20 where the bid is more
than $10 but does not exceed $20, and $1.50 where the bid is more
than $20. An ``acceptable tick distance'' shall be no less than two
minimum increments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    After the rule change is effective, the Exchange will announce the
implementation date of the proposed rule change in a Regulatory
Circular to be published no later than 90 days following the effective
date. The implementation date will be no later than 180 days following
the effective date and at least two weeks after the publication of the
above Regulatory Circular.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \11\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes that the automated handling of
market orders to sell in no-bid series if the Exchange best offer is
$0.50 or less assists with the maintenance of fair and orderly markets
and protects investors and the public interest because it provides for
automated handling of these orders, ultimately resulting in more
efficient executions of these orders. The Exchange believes that the
$0.50 threshold also protects investors and assists with the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets by preventing executions of
market orders to sell in no-bid series with higher offers at
potentially extreme prices in series that are not truly no-bid. The
Exchange believes this threshold appropriately reflects the interests
of investors, as options in no-bid series with offers higher than $0.50
are less likely to be worthless, and cancelling the orders will prevent
the execution of these orders at unfavorable prices. The Exchange also
believes that the $0.50 threshold promotes fair and orderly markets
because market orders to sell in no-bid series with offers of $0.50 or
less are likely to be individuals seeking to close out a worthless
position for which automatic handling is appropriate.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    C2 does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. More specifically, the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed rule changes will impose any burden
on intramarket competition because it will be applicable to all TPHs
trading on the Exchange trading floor. In addition, the Exchange does
not believe the proposed changes will impose any intermarket burden
because the Exchange will operate in a similar manner only with a more
applicable no-bid series threshold.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
    (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest;
    (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and
    (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \12\ and
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \13\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-C2-2014-020 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2014-020. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington,
DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of

10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2014-020 and should be
submitted on or before November 26, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26347 Filed 11-4-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 29421-29423]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10262]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94878; File No. SR-MIAX-2022-18]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Miami International Securities
Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Fee Schedule for the Priority
Customer Rebate Program

May 9, 2022.
    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on April 29, 2022, Miami International Securities
Exchange LLC (``MIAX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a proposed rule change as
described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend the MIAX Options Fee
Schedule (the ``Fee Schedule'').
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at http://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings, at MIAX's principal
office, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend footnote 14 referenced in Section
1)a)iii) of the Fee Schedule to amend the list of MIAX Select Symbols
\3\ contained in the Priority Customer Rebate Program (``PCRP'') \4\ to
remove symbol ``AIG,'' (American International Group, Inc.) from the
Select Symbols list.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``MIAX Select Symbols'' means options overlying
AAL, AAPL, AIG, AMAT, AMD, AMZN, BA, BABA, BB, BIDU, BP, C, CAT,
CLF, CVX, DAL, EBAY, EEM, FB, FCX, GE, GILD, GLD, GM, GOOGL, GPRO,
HAL, INTC, IWM, JNJ, JPM, KMI, KO, MO, MRK, NFLX, NOK, ORCL, PBR,
PFE, PG, QCOM, QQQ, RIG, SPY, T, TSLA, USO, VALE, WBA, WFC, WMB, X,
XHB, XLE, XLF, XLP, XOM and XOP.
    \4\ See section 1)a)iii) of the Fee Schedule for a complete
description of the PCRP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange initially created the list of MIAX Select Symbols on
March 1, 2014,\5\ and has added and removed option classes from that
list since that time.\6\ Select Symbols are rebated slightly higher in
certain PCRP tiers and segment than non-Select Symbols. The Exchange
notes that historically, Select Symbols generally include a subset of
classes of options that are included in the Penny Interval Program, an
industry-wide program that provides for the quoting and trading of
certain option classes in penny increments (the ``Penny Program'').\7\
The Penny Program allows the quoting and trading of certain option
classes in minimum increments of $0.01 for all series in such option
classes with a price of less than $3.00; and in minimum increments of
$0.05 for all series in such option classes with a price of $3.00 or
higher. The Penny Program was initiated as a pilot program at the then
existing option exchanges in January 2007,\8\ was made a permanent
program in 2020, and currently includes more than 300 of the most
actively traded option classes.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71700 (March 12,
2014), 79 FR 15188 (March 18, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-13).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 89530 (August 12,
2020), 85 FR 50845 (August 18, 2020) (SR-MIAX-2020-26); 88850 (May
11, 2020), 85 FR 29497 (May 15, 2020) (SR-MIAX-2020-09); 87964
(January 14, 2020), 85 FR 3435 (January 21, 2020) (SR-MIAX-2020-01);
87790 (December 18, 2019), 84 FR 71037 (December 26, 2019) (SR-MIAX-
2019-49); 85314 (March 14, 2019), 84 FR 10359 (March 20, 2019) (SR-
MIAX-2019-07; 81998 (November 2, 2017), 82 FR 51897 (November 8,
2017) (SR-MIAX-2017-45); 81019 (June 26, 2017), 82 FR 29962 (June
30, 2017) (SR-MIAX-2017-29); 79301 (November 14, 2016), 81 FR 81854
(November 18, 2016) (SR-MIAX-2016-42); 74291 (February 18, 2015), 80
FR 9841 (February 24, 2015) (SR-MIAX-2015-09); 74288 (February 18,
2015), 80 FR 9837 (February 24, 2015) (SR-MIAX-2015-08); 73328
(October 9, 2014), 79 FR 62230 (October 16, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-50);
72567 (July 8, 2014), 79 FR 40818 (July 14, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-34);
72356 (June 10, 2014), 79 FR 34384 (June 16, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-
26); 71700 (March 12, 2014), 79 FR 15188 (March 18, 2014) (SR-MIAX-
2014-13).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88988 (June 2,
2020), 85 FR 35153 (June 8, 2020) (SR-MIAX-2020-13). See also
Exchange Rule 510(c).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 55154 (January 23,
2007), 72 FR 4743 (February 1, 2007) (SR-CBOE-2006-92); 55161
(January 24, 2007), 72 FR 4754 (February 1, 2007) (SR-ISE-2006-62);
54886 (December 6, 2006), 71 FR 74979 (December 13, 2006) (SR-Phlx-
2006-74); 54590 (October 12, 2006), 71 FR 61525 (October 18, 2006)
(SR-NYSEArca-2006-73); and 54741 (November 9, 2006), 71 FR 67176
(November 20, 2006) (SR-Amex-2006-106).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 31, 2022, the Exchange issued an alert that the Select
symbol ``AIG'' would no longer be included in the Penny Program
industry-wide as of April 1, 2022.\9\ Accordingly, for business and
competitive reasons, the Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to
remove the symbol ``AIG'' from the list of MIAX Select Symbols
contained in the PCRP as that Select

Symbol is no longer in the Penny Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See MIAX Listing Alert (March 31, 2022), available at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/alerts/2022/03/31/miax-exchange-group-options-markets-option-classes-be-removed-penny-interval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Implementation
    The proposed change is effective beginning May 1, 2022.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \10\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \11\ in
particular, in that it is an equitable allocation of reasonable fees
and other charges among its members and issuers and other persons using
its facilities. The Exchange also believes the proposal furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act in that it is designed to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments
to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general to protect investors and the public
interest and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers and dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the proposal to remove the symbol ``AIG''
from the list of MIAX Select Symbols contained in the PCRP is
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the Act because the proposed change
will allow for continued benefit to investors by providing them an
updated list of MIAX Select Symbols contained in the PCRP on the Fee
Schedule.
    The Exchange believes that the proposal to amend an option class
that qualifies for the credit for transactions in MIAX Select Symbols
is fair, equitable and not unreasonably discriminatory. The Exchange
believes that the PCRP itself is reasonably designed because it
incentivizes providers of Priority Customer \12\ order flow to send
that Priority Customer order flow to the Exchange in order to receive a
credit in a manner that enables the Exchange to improve its overall
competitiveness and strengthen its market quality for all market
participants. The Exchange believes the PCRP, which provides increased
incentives in certain tiers in high volume select symbols, is also
reasonably designed to increase the competitiveness of the Exchange
with other options exchanges that also offer increased incentives to
higher volume symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The term ``Priority Customer'' means a person or entity
that (i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) does not
place more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average
during a calendar month for its own beneficial account(s). See
Exchange Rule 100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that its proposal is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act because it will apply equally to all
similarly situated Priority Customer orders in MIAX Select Symbols in
the PCRP. All similarly situated Priority Customer orders in MIAX
Select Symbols are subject to the same rebate schedule, and access to
the Exchange is offered on terms that are not unfairly discriminatory.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed
rule change should enable the Exchange to continue to attract and
compete for order flow with other exchanges. Notwithstanding the
removal of the symbol ``AIG'' from the Select Symbols list, the
Exchange's rebates remain highly competitive with those of other
exchanges, and therefore should enable the Exchange to continue to
attract and compete for order flow with other exchanges which offer
comparable rebates for particular symbols. The Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees and rebates to remain competitive with
other exchanges and to attract order flow.
    Further, the Exchange does not believe that its proposal to delete
the symbol ``AIG'' from the list of MIAX Select Symbols contained in
the PCRP will result in any burden on intra-market or inter-market
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. This proposed change is a not a competitive
proposal but rather is designed to update the list of MIAX Select
Symbols contained in the PCRP in order to avoid potential confusion on
the part of market participants and other competing options exchanges.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\13\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \14\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-MIAX-2022-18 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-MIAX-2022-18. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public

Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of
the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do
not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
MIAX-2022-18, and should be submitted on or before June 3, 2022.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10262 Filed 5-12-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 204 (Wednesday, October 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63146-63147]
[FR Doc No: 2014-25187]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2014-0002 (65F98)]

Changes in Flood Hazard Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Final Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: New or modified Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations
(BFEs), base flood depths, Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) boundaries
or zone designations, and/or regulatory floodways (hereinafter referred
to as flood hazard determinations) as shown on the indicated Letter of
Map Revision (LOMR) for each of the communities listed in the table
below are finalized. Each LOMR revises the Flood Insurance Rate Maps
(FIRMs), and in some cases the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) reports,
currently in effect for the listed communities. The flood hazard
determinations modified by each LOMR will be used to calculate flood
insurance premium rates for new buildings and their contents.

DATES: The effective date for each LOMR is indicated in the table
below.

ADDRESSES: Each LOMR is available for inspection at both the respective
Community Map Repository address listed in the table below and online
through the FEMA Map Service Center at www.msc.fema.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Luis Rodriguez, Chief, Engineering
Management Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration,
FEMA, 500 C Street SW., Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
(email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or visit the FEMA Map Information
eXchange (FMIX) online at www.floodmaps.fema.gov/fhm/fmx_main.html.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) makes the final flood hazard determinations as shown in the
LOMRs for each community listed in the table below. Notice of these
modified flood hazard determinations has been published in newspapers
of local circulation and ninety (90) days have elapsed since that
publication. The Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation has
resolved any appeals resulting from this notification.
    The modified flood hazard determinations are made pursuant to
section 206 of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, 42 U.S.C.
4105, and are in accordance with the National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., and with 44 CFR part 65.
    For rating purposes, the currently effective community number is
shown and must be used for all new policies and renewals.
    The new or modified flood hazard information is the basis for the
floodplain management measures that the community is required either to
adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to remain
qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).
    This new or modified flood hazard information, together with the
floodplain management criteria required by 44 CFR 60.3, are the minimum
that are required. They should not be construed to mean that the
community must change any existing ordinances that are more stringent
in their floodplain management requirements. The community may at any
time enact stricter requirements of its own or pursuant to policies
established by other Federal, State, or regional entities.
    This new or modified flood hazard determinations are used to meet
the floodplain management requirements of the NFIP and also are used to
calculate the appropriate flood insurance premium rates for new
buildings, and for the contents in those buildings. The changes in
flood hazard determinations are in accordance with 44 CFR 65.4.
    Interested lessees and owners of real property are encouraged to
review the final flood hazard information available at the address
cited below for each community or online through the FEMA Map Service
Center at www.msc.fema.gov.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Chief executive officer of      Community map            Effective date of        Community
          State and county           Location and case No.           community                repository               modification              No.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Illinois:
    Cook (FEMA Docket No.: B-1420).  City of Palos Heights  The Honorable Robert        City Hall, 7607 West   September 19, 2014..........       170142
                                      (13-05-8093P).         Straz, Mayor, City of       College Drive, Palos
                                                             Palos Heights, 7607 West    Heights, IL 60463.
                                                             College Drive, Palos
                                                             Heights, IL 60463.
    DuPage (FEMA Docket No.: B-      Village of Lisle (14-  The Honorable Joseph J.     Village Hall, 925      September 10, 2014..........       170211
     1420).                           05-2185P).             Broda, Mayor, Village of    Burlington Avenue,
                                                             Lisle, 925 Burlington       Lisle, IL 60532.
                                                             Avenue, Lisle, IL 60532.
Indiana:
    Marshall (FEMA Docket No.: B-    City of Plymouth (14-  The Honorable Mark Senter,  124 North Michigan     September 11, 2014..........       180164
     1420).                           05-0926P).             Mayor, City of Plymouth,    Street, Plymouth, IN
                                                             124 North Michigan          46563.
                                                             Street, Plymouth, IN
                                                             46563.
    Marshall (FEMA Docket No.: B-    Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Kevin         112 West Jefferson,    September 11, 2014..........       180443
     1420).                           of Marshall County     Overmyer, Marshall County   Plymouth, IN 46563.
                                      (14-05-0926P).         President, Board of
                                                             Commissioners, 112 West
                                                             Jefferson Street, Room
                                                             205, Plymouth, IN 46563.
Kansas: Lyon (FEMA Docket No.: B-    City of Emporia (13-   The Honorable Rob           521 Market Street,     October 10, 2014............       200203
 1420).                               07-1700P).             Gilligan, Mayor, City of    Emporia, KS 66801.
                                                             Emporia, P.O. Box 928,
                                                             Emporia, KS 66801.
Minnesota:
    Olmsted (FEMA Docket No.: B-     City of Rochester (13- The Honorable Ardell F.     2122 Campus Drive,     October 17, 2014............       275246
     1420).                           05-8106P).             Brede, Mayor, City of       Suite 300,
                                                             Rochester, 201 4th Street   Rochester, MN 55904.
                                                             SE, Room 281, Rochester,
                                                             MN 55904.
    Pennington (FEMA Docket No.: B-  City of Thief River    The Honorable Jim Dagg,     City Hall, 405 Third   September 18, 2014..........       270344
     1420).                           Falls (14-05-0815P).   Mayor, City of Thief        Street East, Thief
                                                             River Falls, 405 Third      River Falls, MN
                                                             Street East, Thief River    56701.
                                                             Falls, MN 56701.
    Pennington (FEMA Docket No.: B-  Unincorporated Areas   The Honorable Neil          201 Sherwood Avenue    September 18, 2014..........       270651
     1420).                           of Pennington County   Peterson, Pennington        South, Thief River
                                      (14-05-0815P).         County Chairman, Board of   Falls, MN 56701.
                                                             Commissioners, P.O. Box
                                                             616, Thief River Falls,
                                                             MN 56701.

Missouri:
    Buchanan (FEMA Docket No.: B-    City of St. Joseph     The Honorable Bill          1100 Frederick         September 25, 2014..........       290043
     1420).                           (14-07-0148P).         Falkner, Mayor, City of     Avenue, Room 107,
                                                             Saint Joseph, 1100          St. Joseph, MO 64506.
                                                             Frederick Avenue, Room
                                                             309, St. Joseph, MO 64506.
    Cape Girardeau (FEMA Docket      City of Cape           The Honorable Harry         401 Independence       September 8, 2014...........       290458
     No.: B-1420).                    Girardeau (14-07-      Rediger, Mayor, City of     Street, Cape
                                      0463P).                Cape Girardeau, 401         Girardeau, MO 63703.
                                                             Independence Street, Cape
                                                             Girardeau, MO 63703.
New Hampshire: Hillsborough (FEMA    City of Nashua (14-01- The Honorable Donnalee      229 Main Street,       September 19, 2014..........       330097
 Docket No.: B-1420).                 0876P).                Lozeau, Mayor, City of      Nashua, NH 03061.
                                                             Nashua, 229 Main Street,
                                                             Nashua, NH 03061.
Ohio:
    Logan (FEMA Docket No.: B-1420)  City of Bellefontaine  The Honorable Adam          135 North Detroit      September 19, 2014..........       390340
                                      (14-05-4416P).         Brannon, Mayor, City of     Street,
                                                             Bellefontaine, 135 North    Bellefontaine, OH
                                                             Detroit Street,             43311.
                                                             Bellefontaine, OH 43311.
    Summit (FEMA Docket No.: B-      City of Hudson (14-05- The Honorable William A.    27 East Main Street,   September 22, 2014..........       390660
     1420).                           3718P).                Currin, Mayor, City of      Hudson, OH 44236.
                                                             Hudson, 115 Executive
                                                             Parkway, Suite 400,
                                                             Hudson, OH 44236.
Oregon:
    Jackson (FEMA Docket No.: B-     City of Medford (13-   The Honorable Gary          411 West 8th Street,   September 18, 2014..........       410096
     1420).                           10-1490P).             Wheeler, Mayor, City of     Medford, OR 97501.
                                                             Medford, 411 West 8th
                                                             Street, Medford, OR 97501.
    Jackson (FEMA Docket No.: B-     City of Medford (14-   The Honorable Gary          411 West 8th Street,   September 15, 2014..........       410096
     1420).                           10-0435P).             Wheeler, Mayor, City of     Medford, OR 97501.
                                                             Medford, 411 West 8th
                                                             Street, Medford, OR 97501.
Wisconsin: Chippewa (FEMA Docket     City of Eau Clare (14- Mr. Russell Van Gompel,     City Hall, 203 South   September 12, 2014..........       550128
 No.: B-1420).                        05-1736P).             City of Eau Claire, City    Farwell Street,
                                                             Manager, 203 South          Third Floor, Eau
                                                             Farwell Street, Third       Claire, WI 54701.
                                                             Floor, Eau Claire, WI
                                                             54701.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 97.022, ``Flood
Insurance.'')

    Dated: September 29, 2014.
Roy E. Wright,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Mitigation, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2014-25187 Filed 10-21-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P