[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 25 (Thursday, February 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 6944-6945]
[FR Doc No: 2020-02378]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0644; FRL-10003-63]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Renewal of an
Existing Collection (EPA ICR No. 0277.20; OMB Control No. 2070-0060);
Comment Request

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), this
document announces that EPA is planning to submit an Information
Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
The ICR, entitled: ``Application for New and Amended Pesticide
Registration'' and identified by EPA ICR No. 0277.20 and OMB Control
No. 2070-0060, represents the renewal of an existing ICR that is
scheduled to expire on September 30, 2020. Before submitting the ICR to
OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific
aspects of the proposed information collection that is summarized in
this document. The ICR and accompanying material are available in the
docket for public review and comment.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before April 6, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0644, by one of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute.
     Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
     Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at http://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
    Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Callie Koller, Field and External
Affairs Division, 7650P, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. What information is EPA particularly interested in?

    Pursuant to PRA section 3506(c)(2)(A) (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)),
EPA specifically solicits comments and information to enable it to:
    1. Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Agency,
including whether the information will have practical utility.
    2. Evaluate the accuracy of the Agency's estimates of the burden of
the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used.
    3. Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected.
    4. Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. In particular, EPA is requesting comments from
very small businesses (those that employ less than 25) on examples of
specific additional efforts that EPA could make to reduce the paperwork
burden for very small businesses affected by this collection.

II. What information collection activity or ICR does this action apply
to?

    Title: Application for New and Amended Pesticide Registration.
    EPA ICR number: 0277.20.
    OMB control number: OMB Control No. 2070-0060.
    ICR status: This ICR is currently scheduled to expire on September
30, 2020.
    An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), after
appearing in the Federal Register when approved, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, are displayed either by publication in the Federal Register or
by other appropriate means, such as on the related collection
instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB control numbers
for certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: The information collected under this ICR is used by EPA
to evaluate an application for the registration of a pesticide product
under section 3 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (FIFRA) and section 408 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA). FIFRA provides EPA with the authority to regulate the
distribution, sale and use of pesticides in the United States to ensure
that they will not pose unreasonable adverse effects to human health
and the environment. Pesticides that meet this test receive a license
or ``registration.''
    Burden statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to range from 14
hours to 646 hours per response, depending upon the type of activity.
Estimates for the respondent's application burden for this collection
of information average 194 hours per application for ``Type A''
activities (which include new active ingredients and new uses) and 14
hours per application for ``Type B'' activities (which include
amendments and notifications). The burden estimate for ``Type C''
reduced risk applications, which are handled only by RD, is an average
of 646 hours per response. Burden is defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    The ICR, which is available in the docket along with other related
materials, provides a detailed explanation of the collection activities
and the burden estimate that is only briefly summarized here:
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this ICR are pesticide and other agricultural chemical manufacturing
engaged in activities related to the registration of a pesticide
product.
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 1,808.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Estimated total average number of responses for each respondent:
7,440.
    Estimated total annual burden hours: 145,840-1,595,306 hours.
    Estimated total annual costs: $43,675,000-$64,424,000. This
includes an estimated cost of $0 for capital investment or maintenance
and operational costs.

III. Are there changes in the estimates from the last approval?

    There is an increase of 627 hours in the total estimated respondent
burden compared with that identified in the ICR currently approved by
OMB. This increase reflects anticipated burden associated with several
new registration-related programs that are online and anticipated to
come online in the next three years. This change is an adjustment.

IV. What is the next step in the process for this ICR?

    EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.12. EPA will issue another
Federal Register document pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you have any questions about this ICR or
the approval process, please contact the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

    Authority:  44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

    Dated: January 30, 2020.
Alexandra Dapolito Dunn,
Assistant Administrator, Office of Chemical Safety and Pollution
Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2020-02378 Filed 2-5-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 93 (Friday, May 13, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 27897]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11800]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2011-0342]

Security and Safety Zone Regulations, Large Passenger Vessel
Protection, Captain of the Port Columbia River Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the security and safety zone in
33 CFR 165.1318 for large passenger vessels operating in the Captain of
the Port, Columbia River Zone intermittently between the months of May
and September 2011. This action is necessary to ensure the security and
safety of the large passenger vessels, including their crew and
passengers, as well as the maritime public. During the enforcement
period, no person or vessel may enter the security and safety zone
without permission from the Captain of the Port Columbia River.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.1318 will be enforced during the
following dates and times for the vessels noted:
    (1) LPV Westerdam: From 6:30 a.m. May 4, 2011 through 12 a.m.
(midnight) May 5, 2011.
    (2) LPV Norwegian Pearl: From 6:30 a.m. May 5, 2011 through 12 a.m.
(midnight) on May 6, 2011.
    (3) LPV Millenium: From 7:30 a.m. May 9, 2011 through 12 a.m.
(midnight) on May 10, 2011.
    (4) LPV Sapphire Princess: From 5:30 a.m. May 11, 2011 through 12
a.m. (midnight) on May 12, 2011.
    (5) LPV Seven Seas Navigator: From 6:30 a.m. May 15, 2011 through
12 a.m. (midnight) on May 16, 2011.
    (6) LPV Island Princess: From 5:30 a.m. May 16, 2011 through 12
a.m. (midnight) on May 17, 2011.
    (7) LPV Century: From 6:30 a.m. May 19, 2011 through 12 a.m.
(midnight) on May 20, 2011.
    (8) LPV Statendam: From 6:30 a.m. May 20, 2011 through 12 a.m.
(midnight) on May 21, 2011.
    (9) LPV Regatta: From 10:30 a.m. May 24, 2011 through 12 a.m.
(midnight) on May 25, 2011.
    (10) LPV Regatta: From 6:30 a.m. May 28, 2011 through 12 a.m.
(midnight) on May 29, 2011.
    (11) LPV Regatta: From 6:30 a.m. August 24, 2011 through 12 a.m.
(midnight) on August 25, 2011.
    (12) LPV Regatta: From 10:30 a.m. September 7, 2011 through 12 a.m.
(midnight) on September 8, 2011.
    (13) LPV Seven Seas Navigator: From 7:30 a.m. September 10, 2011
through 12 a.m. (midnight) on September 11, 2011.
    (14) LPV Zuiderdam: From 10:30 a.m. September 25, 2011 through 12
a.m. on September 26, 2011.
    (15) LPV Norwegian Pearl: From 7:30 a.m. September 26, 2011 through
12 a.m. (midnight) on September 27, 2011.
    (16) LPV Norwegian Pearl: From 6:30 a.m. September 27, 2011 through
12 a.m. (midnight) on September 28, 2011.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call or e-mail MST1 Jaime Sayers, Coast Guard Marine Safety Unit
Portland; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety and
security zone regulation in 33 CFR 165.1318 for large passenger vessels
operating in the Columbia River Captain of the Port Zone during the
dates and times listed in DATES.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.1318 and 33 CFR 165 Subparts C
and D, no person or vessel may enter or remain in the safety and
security zone without permission of the Captain of the Port, Columbia
River. Persons or vessels wishing to enter the safety and security zone
may request permission to do so from the on-scene Captain of the Port
representative via VHF Channel 16 or 13. The Coast Guard may be
assisted by other Federal, State, or local enforcement agencies in
enforcing this regulation.
    This document is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.1318 and 5
U.S.C. 552(a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the
Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with notification of
this enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners.

    Dated: May 3, 2011.
D.E. Kaup,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Columbia River.
[FR Doc. 2011-11800 Filed 5-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING BROWNFIELDS AREA-WIDE PLANNING COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT REPORTING FORM

Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 3.5 hours per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate, or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Environmental Information, Code 2822T, Washington, DC 20460; and to the Paperwork Reduction Project, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC 20503. DO NOT RETURN your form to either of these addresses. Send your completed form to the address provided by the issuing office.

Overview
As specified in the cooperative agreement terms and conditions, all Brownfields Area-Wide Planning (BF AWP) cooperative agreement recipients (CARs) must report to EPA no later than 30 days after the end of each reporting quarter.

 All CARs must complete and regularly maintain a BF AWP Cooperative Agreement Reporting Form.

 The CAR must use the Brownfields Program on-line reporting system, known as Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES), to associate to the BF AWP grant all relevant property records (such as site assessments and cleanups) that are already in ACRES.
 If the CAR is also a recipient of an EPA Brownfields assessment, cleanup or revolving loan fund (RLF) grant for a property within the BF AWP project area, then the CAR must first create property record(s) in ACRES and complete a Brownfields Property Profile Form as required under their assessment, cleanup or RLF grant, and then associate the appropriate property record(s) with ACRES ID to the BF AWP grant record.
 The CAR will not create any new ACRES ID property records as part of their BF AWP grant record.
 If EPA provides a Targeted Brownfields Assessment (TBA) within the BF AWP project area, the CAR will work with EPA to associate this TBA to the BF AWP grant.

 The CAR must also track and report all leveraging information (resources) and accomplishments for the BF AWP project area. The CAR will ensure that any leveraging that is already otherwise associated to a particular property in ACRES is not double counted (e.g., the same leveraging resource and amount should not be captured for both the BF AWP grant and any associated assessment, cleanup or revolving loan fund property).

 When to submit:
 The original BF AWP Cooperative Agreement Reporting Form must be submitted when the cooperative agreement recipient starts using EPA funds to pay for eligible BF AWP activities.
 The CAR will update this form and ACRES as new activities, accomplishments, leveraged resources, associated properties and changes pertaining to revitalizing the BF AWP project area are available.
 The CAR will update this form upon completion of the brownfields area-wide plan and when the cooperative agreement is being closed out.
 The CAR should continue to update the form as plan implementation actions are taken and new investments occur within the BF AWP project area. If the CAR has project area updates to report after the closeout of the cooperative agreement but is unable to make updates in ACRES, please contact the ACRES Help desk at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
 To whom to submit: CARs must submit their BF AWP Cooperative Agreement Reporting Form to their EPA Regional Representative identified in the terms and conditions of the cooperative agreement. If data is entered online it will automatically be delivered to the EPA Regional Representative.

 How to submit: ACRES is available online and is the preferred method for all CARs to enter and electronically submit the BF AWP Cooperative Agreement Reporting Form. The form may also be submitted in hard copy with the next required quarterly progress report or submitted via e-mail to the EPA Regional Representative.

Additional reporting requirements may be included in the terms and conditions of the cooperative agreement.

This Office of Management and Budget (OMB) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) approved reporting form (OMB Form 2050-0192, EPA Form 6200-14), supplements the required quarterly progress reports. Please note that in most instances, all reported information is accessible to the public under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and may be distributed by EPA to the public unless one of the FOIA exclusions is applicable.

Detailed Instructions for Completing Each Item on the Form
The BF AWP Cooperative Agreement Reporting Form is divided into five parts. Unless otherwise indicated, reporting in each section is mandatory for all CARs. Some questions need only be answered once; other questions should be updated when conditions change within the BF AWP project area. Additional instructions and definitions for completing this form are provided below. Please contact your EPA Regional Representative if you have any questions when completing this form.

Cooperative Agreement Recipient Information
1. Cooperative Agreement Recipient Name. Enter the CAR name. Use the official name of the CAR as written in the cooperative agreement documentation, unless otherwise directed by the EPA Regional Representative.

2a-d. City, County, State and Zip Code. Enter the city, county, state and zip code for the CAR.

3. Cooperative Agreement Number. Enter the number of the cooperative agreement as provided in the cooperative agreement documentation (e.g., BF 00000000).

4. Indicate if this form is the initial or updated form. Indicate if this is the first BF AWP Cooperative Agreement Reporting Form being submitted or an updated version of a previously submitted form.

Part I  -  BF AWP Project Area Information

5. Name of BF AWP Project Area. If the project area has a specific name, enter it here.

6a. Boundaries of the BF AWP Project Area. Enter geographic boundaries of your BF AWP project area. Use street names and/or natural or constructed boundaries (such as a river or railroad). Be specific as these boundaries will be used for mapping and other analysis.

6b. Insert map of project area within broader context of the city or larger community. Copy and paste a map with clear scale and street-level detail, which precisely delineates your BF AWP project area boundaries within the context of the city or larger community.

7. Project area size (in acres). Enter approximate acreage of your project area.

8. Project area description.  Provide a brief description of the project area, highlighting a few key identifying features, area characteristics, typical land uses and general population.

ACRES - Associated Brownfields Properties
9. Number of brownfields properties within the BF AWP project area that have an ACRES ID. Enter the number of properties within the project area that already have an ACRES ID because they have received EPA brownfields resources for assessment and/or cleanup.
If you answered one or more to question 9, answer items pertaining to question 10 as needed
10a. Associated brownfields site 1. Enter the ACRES ID for the first associated brownfields site.
If needed, add information for additional associated properties
10b. Associated brownfields site 2 (or 3, 4, 5, etc). Enter the ACRES ID for the any additional associated brownfields site(s). If needed, use 10.c for site 3, 10.d. for site 4, 10.e. for site 5, etc.

Catalyst Site(s)
11. Number of catalyst/high priority brownfield site(s) within BF AWP project area. Enter the number of properties within the project area that are considered to be the catalyst/high priority sites within the BF AWP project area, as identified in the grant workplan. Please note that a catalyst/ high priority brownfield site may or may not already have an ACRES ID.

If you answered one or more to question 11, answer items pertaining to question 12 as needed
For each site that is considered a catalyst/high priority brownfield within the BF AWP project area, specify whether the site has an ACRES ID. If a site does not have an ACRES ID, provide the site name, address and size (in acres).

12a. Catalyst/high priority site 1. Enter the ACRES ID, or if the site does not have an ACRES ID enter the site name, address and site size (in acres).

If needed, add information for additional sites
12b. Catalyst/high priority site 2 (or 3, 4, 5, etc). Enter the ACRES ID, or if the site does not have an ACRES ID enter the site name, address and site size (in acres). If needed, use 12.c for site 3, 12.d. for site 4, 12.e. for site 5, etc.

Part II: Leveraged Resources

The table in this section collects information pertaining to resources that have been or are being leveraged to support revitalization outcomes within the BF AWP project area that are consistent with the goals of the brownfields area-wide plan. Resources reported here as leveraging must be used to support outputs related to the BF AWP cooperative agreement-funded and/or outcomes related to the broader project area revitalization efforts.

Leveraged resources includes funds (private or public investment, grant funds, etc), related technical assistance, and other resources provided in-kind. Leveraged funds may be used to support allowable activities (e.g., inventory, assessment, cleanup) and activities that cannot be funded by the EPA cooperative agreement (e.g., demolition, property preparation, redevelopment construction, transportation improvements, marketing, etc) that should be reported in this section.

To be reportable, there must be a demonstrable link or connection between the EPA-funded activity and the leveraged resource. The leveraged resource should be reported only when awarded and manifested. Given that in many cases the BF AWP effort happened as a result of or alongside other project area revitalization efforts, leveraged resources reported here may pre-date the award of the BF AWP cooperative agreement. Therefore it is imperative that the CAR report the year the resources were awarded or provided.

CARs should take great care to ensure that leveraged resources are not double-counted. Any leveraged resource that is already reported in ACRES as part of a specific property record (e.g., reported as part of an assessment or cleanup site and is associated to the BF AWP grant) must not be reported in this section. Site-specific leveraging that is already reported in ACRES as part of a specific property record will be captured as part of the property record's association to the BF AWP grant.

Table A: Leveraged Resources

The table in this section collects the Source of Resources, name of the entity(ies) providing resources, the year resources awarded or provided, how the resources are used, and the amount of resources leveraged to support the BF AWP project or BF AWP project area revitalization. Please use a separate line for each resource listed. The Source of Resources funding categories include:
 Other Federal. Select if any other federal resources were leveraged beyond the BF AWP grant and any associated brownfields listed under item 10. Other federal resources include, for example, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Community Development Block Grant, U.S. Economic Development Administration Public Works grant, EPA technical assistance project, U.S. Department of Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER), etc.
 State/Tribal Funding. Select if any state and tribal resources (exclusive of state and tribal property-specific 128(a) cooperative agreement funds) were leveraged (e.g., state brownfields grant, state economic development grant).
 Local Government. Select if any local resources were leveraged (e.g., local bond/tax increment financing).
 Private/Other. Select if any private resources were leveraged (e.g., company X, developer Y, non-profit Z).

Name of Entity Providing Resources. Indicate the name of the entity that provided resources.

Year Resources Awarded/Provided. Use the dropdown boxes to select the year the leveraged resources were awarded or provided to assist with BF AWP project area revitalization. For grant funds or technical assistance, select the year the leveraged resources were awarded. For other resources including leveraging from private investment, select the year the leverage resources were provided within the BF AWP project area.

Resources used for. Select one of the dropdown categories for items that were not paid under the BF AWP grant:
 Infrastructure improvement: e.g. transportation, utility, broadband improvements
 Supporting study: e.g. a market or renewable energy study of the project area
 Community outreach/education: e.g., donated meeting space or events used for BF AWP community sessions; free advertising to the community of BF AWP events; community surveys
 Recreation/greenspace improvements: e.g., development of park or recreation space within the BF AWP project area
 Building (new/rehab): e.g, development of new or rehabilitated buildings within the BF AWP project area
 Other

Also provide a specific yet brief description of how the resources were used in support of the BF AWP project outputs and/or BF AWP project area revitalization outcomes.

Amount of Resources Leveraged in Support of BF AWP Project/Area-wide Revitalization. Enter the amount of resources that were used in support of BF AWP project outputs or BF AWP project area revitalization outcomes. Only the amount that is specific to the BF AWP project area should be captured here. If the leveraged resources is designated for an area larger than the BF AWP project area (e.g. if the resources was provided for a city-wide improvement), include here only the amount used within the BF AWP project area.
Estimates are accepted but the methodology for apportionment of funds must be documented in the grant file.

Part III: Brownfields Area-Wide Planning Documents

13. Provide weblink to final brownfields area-wide plan document(s). Enter the weblink where the final brownfields area-wide plan and related documents can be accessed.
14. Provide weblink for project photographs. Enter the weblink where photographs from the project can be accessed.
15. Share highlights from the final brownfields area-wide plan. Include a brief summary that highlights the community and project area goals identified in the final brownfields area-wide plan, including the overall BF AWP project approach.
16. Describe past uses and planned future uses within the BF AWP project area. Indicate within the tables the type and amount (select acres or square footage) for:
 Past/existing land uses within the BF AWP project area, and
 Planned future land uses within the BF AWP project area (as described within the brownfields area-wide plan)

Land use categories include:
 Greenspace: agricultural site, field, forest, nature trails, park, playing fields, playground, pond, recreational area, stormwater management areas, green roof, urban forest canopy, wetland, wildlife refuge;
 Residential: housing;
  Industrial: chemical plant, foundry, machine shop, incineration, landfill, manufacturing (general), mill (general), mining, petroleum (distribution/storage), power generating plant, utility, warehouse, water treatment/sewage plant, wood products site; and
 Commercial: automotive (dealership), dry cleaning facility, bank, museum, office, laundry, recycling, retail, service station, storage, public services, places of worship, schools, transportation center (bus, rail, etc.).
 Other: include other land use types not already described in the above categories, and further describe the specific type of land use
 For properties with more than one future use (i.e., mixed use), check all categories that apply and indicate the proportional acreage of each use.

Part IV: Implementation Activities

 Conducting brownfield site assessments, cleanup or other site preparation activities within the project area
  Continuing to reach out to community members and project partners, and create opportunities to be involved with plan implementation
 Working with local property owners, developers, and/or securing parcels as needed, to prepare brownfields for reuse
 Targeting infrastructure and housing improvements (including design/construction/abatement activities) to the project area
 Tying the BF AWP implementation efforts to other city or regional planning efforts
 Changing/updating policy: e.g., local zoning, creating tax increment (or similar) financing or business improvement districts, adopting the brownfields area-wide plan, making other changes
 Leveraging infrastructure investments that enable revitalization
 Securing grants or technical assistance opportunities to help further implementation
 Securing  nonprofit or private funds to help further implementation
 Working with developers to help further implementation
 Strengthening relationships with federal, state, tribal, regional and local partners to continue support for the BF AWP revitalization goals
 List other implementation activities
 17. Which of these plan implementation activities relate to your BF AWP project area? Check all that apply. Select Completed, Underway, Not Yet Started & Not Applicable from the dropdown menu. In the space next to each selection, provide one or more specific examples of how you are working on or completed the BF AWP plan implementation activity.  Add a new line to list any activity not listed.

18. Have any catalyst/high priority sites and/or other associated brownfield properties within the BF AWP project area been redeveloped or reused consistent with the goals of the brownfields area-wide plan? Select Yes, No or Underway from the dropdown boxes to indicate whether any catalyst/high priority sites or other associated brownfields properties within the BF AWP project area have been or are being redeveloped/reused consistent with the goals of the brownfields area-wide plan

If you answered Yes or Underway question 18, answer items pertaining to question 19 as needed
19a-1. Catalyst/high priority site 1. The information from item 12a will automatically appear. Select how this property has been redeveloped/reused using the dropdown land use categories. Select all land use categories that apply, and enter the associated acreage or square footage.
If needed, information from the additional catalyst/high priority sites will appear as 19a-2 (or 3,4,5, etc).
19a-2. Catalyst/high priority site 2. The information from item 12b will automatically appear. Select how this property has been redeveloped/reused using the dropdown land use categories.
Select all land use categories that apply, and enter the associated acreage or square footage.

19b-1. Associated brownfields site 1. The information from item 10a will automatically appear. Select how this property has been redeveloped/reused using the dropdown land use categories. Select all land use categories that apply, and enter the associated acreage or square footage.

If needed, information from the additional associated brownfield sites will appear as 19b-2 (or 3,4,5, etc).
19b-2. Associated brownfields site 2. The information from item 10b will automatically appear. Select how this property has been redeveloped/reused using the dropdown land use categories.
Select all land use categories that apply, and enter the associated acreage or square footage.

 Land use categories include:
  Greenspace: agricultural site, field, forest, nature trails, park, playing fields, playground, pond, recreational area, stormwater management areas, green roof, urban forest canopy, wetland, wildlife refuge;
 Residential: housing;
 Industrial: chemical plant, foundry, machine shop, incineration, landfill, manufacturing (general), mill (general), mining, petroleum (distribution/storage), power generating plant, utility, warehouse, water treatment/sewage plant, wood products site; and
 Commercial: automotive (dealership), dry cleaning facility, bank, museum, office, laundry, recycling, retail, service station, storage, public services, places of worship, schools, transportation center (bus, rail, etc.).
 Other: include other land use types not already described in the above categories, and further describe the specific type of land use
 For properties with more than one future use (i.e., mixed use), check all categories that apply and indicate the proportional acreage of each use.

Part V: Successes, Challenges and Lessons Learned

20. Share one or more activities and/or approaches that worked well for your BF AWP project. Provide one or more "best practice" activity or approach that contributed to the success of your project.

21. Share one or more major challenges and/or barriers identified during the BF AWP project. Provide one or more challenge/barrier/obstacle you faced during your BF AWP project. Also include if/how you were able to work through each challenge/barrier/obstacle.

22. Share key lessons learned and/or any advice you would give to future BF AWP cooperative agreement recipients. Provide a short summary of lessons learned during your BF AWP project. Also include some words of advice to future CARs that will help them learn from your BF AWP grantee experience.

23. Describe how the cooperative agreement term & condition for considering changing climate conditions was met during the BF AWP process. Include a brief statement describing how you met the term & condition for considering changing climate conditions.
 CARs need to document in their BF AWP cooperative agreement file how they met this term & condition.
 CARs are encouraged to use and include in their BF AWP cooperative agreement file the BF AWP GRANTEE CHECKLIST: How to Address Changing Climate Concerns in Your Brownfields Area-Wide Planning Project found at http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/brownfields-bf-awp-climate-adaptation-checklist.
 The term & condition for considering changing climate conditions states: "As recipients develop the brownfields area-wide plan and implementation strategy, they must consider whether the proposed reuses for brownfield site(s) and other land in the project area are appropriate, given local changing climate conditions (e.g., sea level rise, site proximity to a flood plain, likelihood of increased major storm events, drought conditions, etc.). Recipients may additionally consider the degree to which the proposed reuses in the project area can be designed to reduce greenhouse gas discharges, reduce energy use or employ alternative energy sources, reduce volume of wastewater generated/disposed, reduce volume of materials taken to landfills, reduce stormwater run-off, improve air quality, and recycle and re-use materials generated during the cleanup and reuse process, to the maximum extent practicable."

Approvals
24. Cooperative Agreement Recipient Project Manager. Type or print the name of the cooperative agreement recipient project manager. The project manager should also sign and date the completed form before submission.

25. U.S. EPA Regional Representative. Type or print the name of the EPA Regional representative. The EPA representative should also sign and date the reviewed form.


QUESTIONS YOUR RESPONSE 1. Number of CWISs: Facility Shut in.

2. Brief description of each CWIS ( e. g., sea chest, simple pipe):

3. Rough dimensions of each CWIS and indicate whether CWIS has existing flange:

4. Screen type ( e. g., strainer, wedge wire) with mesh size:

5. Total daily maximum design water intake volumn of each CWIS:

6. Total daily water intake volume of each CWIS ( set up/ drilling):

7. Total daily cooling water intake volume of each CWIS ( set up/ drilling):

8. Design through screen velocity of each CWIS ( i. e., Q= V* A) ( set up/ drilling):

9. List purposes of cooling water intake ( e. g., cool crude oil, produced water, power generators, drill pipe brakes):

10. List purposes of non cooling water intakes ( e. g., fire, water, hotel loads) other than ballast water:

11. Total volume of water intake for ballasting, duration of ballast intake, and through screen velocity of ballast intake:

12. Describe mitigation measures used for reducing impingement and entrainment of aquatic organisms ( e. g., sea chest screens, strainers):

13. Describe measures used to reduce or prevent biofouling: OCS Lease and Block: Platform Name: Dillon Platform COOLING WATER INTAKE STRUCTURE ( CWIS) INFORMATION The following questions apply to cooling water intake structure( s) at oil and gas extraction facility. If you own more than one facilty, please copy the questions and answer separately for each facility.

Prospect or Field Name: Company: Unocal 14. Describe mitigation measures used for reducing exotic species migration through ballast water:


[Federal Register: January 30, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 20)]
[Notices]
[Page 5534-5535]
[DOCID:fr30ja08-48]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12972-000]

Little River Hydro, LLC; Notice of Application Accepted for
Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and Protests

January 24, 2008.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric applications have been
filed with the Commission and are available for public inspection:
    a. Type of Application: Preliminary Permit.
    b. Project No.: P-12972-000.
    c. Date Filed: August 31, 2007.
    d. Applicant: Little River Hydro, LLC.
    e. Name of the Project: Millwood Dam Hydroelectric.
    f. Location: The project would be located on the Little River in
Little River County, Arkansas. The Millwood Dam is owned and maintained
by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a--825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Brent Smith, Symbiotics, LLC, P.O. Box
535, Rigby, ID 83442, Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Patricia W. Gillis,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. Deadline for filing comments, protests, and motions to
intervene: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. Comments, protests, and
interventions may be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of
paper; see 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the
Commission's Web site under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission
strongly encourages electronic filings. Please include the project
number (P-12972-000) on any comments or motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
intervenors filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person in the official service list for the
project. Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    k. Description of Project: The proposed project would utilize the
existing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Millwood Dam and would consist
of: (1) Three proposed 300-foot-long, 144-inch-diameter steel
penstocks; (2) a proposed powerhouse containing two generating units
with a total installed capacity of 18-megawatts; (3) a proposed
switchyard; (4) a proposed 0.1-mile-long, 25-kV transmission line; and
(5) appurtenant facilities. The proposed project would have an
estimated annual generation of approximately 39-gigawatts and would be
sold to a local utility.
    l. Location of Application: A copy of the application is available
for inspection and reproduction at the Commission in the Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the

``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3676 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is

also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item h
above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Competing Preliminary Permit: Anyone desiring to file a
competing application for preliminary permit for a proposed project
must submit the competing application itself, or a notice of intent to
file such an application, to the Commission on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application (see 18 CFR 4.36).
Submission of a timely notice of intent allows an interested person to
file the competing preliminary permit application no later than 30 days
after the specified comment date for the particular application. A
competing preliminary permit application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30
and 4.36.
    o. Competing Development Application: Any qualified development
applicant desiring to file a competing development application must
submit to the Commission, on or before a specified comment date for the

particular application, either a competing development application or a
notice of intent to file such an application. Submission of a timely
notice of intent to file a development application allows an interested
person to file the competing application no later than 120 days after
the specified comment date for the particular application. A competing
license application must conform with 18 CFR 4.30 and 4.36.
    p. Notice of Intent: A notice of intent must specify the exact
name, business address, and telephone number of the prospective
applicant, and must include an unequivocal statement of intent to
submit, if such an application may be filed, either a preliminary
permit application or a development application (specify which type of
application). A notice of intent must be served on the applicant(s)
named in this public notice.
    q. Proposed Scope of Studies Under Permit: A preliminary permit, if
issued, does not authorize construction. The term of the proposed
preliminary permit would be 36 months. The work proposed under the
preliminary permit would include economic analysis, preparation of
preliminary engineering plans, and a study of environmental impacts.
Based on the results of these studies, the Applicant would decide
whether to proceed with the preparation of a development application to
construct and operate the project.
    r. Comments, Protests, or Motions To Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See 18 CFR 385.2001 (a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov

under the ``e-Filing'' link.
    s. Filing and Service of Responsive Documents: Any filings must
bear in all capital letters the title ``COMMENTS'', ``NOTICE OF INTENT
TO FILE COMPETING APPLICATION'', ``COMPETING APPLICATION'',
``PROTEST'', and ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable, and the
Project Number of the particular application to which the filing
refers. Any of the above-named documents must be filed by providing the
original and the number of copies provided by the Commission's
regulations to: The Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. An additional copy must be
sent to Director, Division of Hydropower Administration and Compliance,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, at the above-mentioned address. A
copy of any notice of intent, competing application or motion to
intervene must also be served upon each representative of the Applicant
specified in the particular application.
    t. Agency Comments: Federal, State, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-1630 Filed 1-29-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 116 (Thursday, June 16, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 35101-35103]
[FR Doc No: 2011-13955]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 97

[Docket No. 30785; Amdt. No. 3428]

Standard Instrument Approach Procedures, and Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle Departure Procedures; Miscellaneous Amendments

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This establishes, amends, suspends, or revokes Standard
Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and associated Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle Departure Procedures for operations at certain airports.
These regulatory actions are needed because of the adoption of new or
revised criteria, or because of changes occurring in the National
Airspace System, such as the commissioning of new navigational
facilities, adding new obstacles, or changing air traffic requirements.
These changes are designed to provide safe and efficient use of the
navigable airspace and to promote safe flight operations under
instrument flight rules at the affected airports.

DATES: This rule is effective June 16, 2011. The compliance date for
each SIAP, associated Takeoff Minimums, and ODP is specified in the
amendatory provisions.
    The incorporation by reference of certain publications listed in
the regulations is approved by the Director of the Federal Register as
of June 16, 2011.

ADDRESSES: Availability of matters incorporated by reference in the
amendment is as follows:
    For Examination--
    1. FAA Rules Docket, FAA Headquarters Building, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located;
    3. The National Flight Procedures Office, 6500 South MacArthur
Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169 or
    4. The National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    Availability--All SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPs are available
online free of charge. Visit http://www.nfdc.faa.gov to register.
Additionally, individual SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and ODP copies may
be obtained from:
    1. FAA Public Inquiry Center (APA-200), FAA Headquarters Building,
800 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; or
    2. The FAA Regional Office of the region in which the affected
airport is located.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Harry J. Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AFS-420), Flight Technologies and Programs Divisions,
Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500 South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma
City, OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box 25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This rule amends Title 14 of the Code of
Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97), by establishing,
amending, suspending, or revoking SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and/or ODPS.
The complete regulators description of each SIAP and its associated
Takeoff Minimums or ODP for an identified airport is listed on FAA form
documents which are incorporated by reference in this amendment under 5
U.S.C. 552(a), 1 CFR part 51, and 14 CFR part 97.20. The applicable FAA
Forms are FAA Forms 8260-3, 8260-4, 8260-5, 8260-15A, and 8260-15B when
required by an entry on 8260-15A.
    The large number of SIAPs, Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, in addition
to their complex nature and the need for a special format make
publication in the Federal Register expensive and impractical.
Furthermore, airmen do not use the regulatory text of the SIAPs,
Takeoff Minimums or ODPs, but instead refer to their depiction on
charts printed by publishers of aeronautical materials. The advantages
of incorporation by reference are realized and publication of the
complete description of each SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP listed on
FAA forms is unnecessary. This amendment provides the affected CFR
sections and specifies the types of SIAPs and the effective dates of
the, associated Takeoff Minimums and ODPs. This amendment also
identifies the airport and its location, the procedure, and the
amendment number.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 97 is effective upon publication of
each separate SIAP, Takeoff Minimums and ODP as contained in the
transmittal. Some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums and textual ODP amendments
may have been issued previously by the FAA in a Flight Data Center
(FDC) Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) as an emergency action of immediate
flight safety relating directly to published aeronautical charts. The
circumstances which created the need for some SIAP and Takeoff Minimums
and ODP amendments may require making them effective in less than 30
days. For the remaining SIAPS and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS, an
effective date at least 30 days after publication is provided.
    Further, the SIAPs and Takeoff Minimums and ODPS contained in this
amendment are based on the criteria contained in the U.S. Standard for
Terminal Instrument Procedures (TERPS). In developing these SIAPS and
Takeoff Minimums and ODPs, the TERPS criteria were applied to the
conditions existing or anticipated at the affected airports. Because of
the close and immediate relationship between these SIAPs, Takeoff
Minimums and ODPs, and safety in air commerce, I find that notice and
public procedures before adopting these SIAPS, Takeoff Minimums and
ODPs are impracticable and contrary to the public interest and, where
applicable, that good cause exists for making some SIAPs effective in
less than 30 days.

Conclusion

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore--(1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,1979); and
(3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. For the same reason, the FAA
certifies that this amendment will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 97

    Air Traffic Control, Airports, Incorporation by reference, and
Navigation (Air).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on May 27, 2011.
Ray Towles,
Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service.

Adoption Of The Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, Title 14,

Code of Federal Regulations, Part 97 (14 CFR part 97) is amended by
establishing, amending, suspending, or revoking Standard Instrument
Approach Procedures and/or Takeoff Minimums and/or Obstacle Departure
Procedures effective at 0902 UTC on the dates specified, as follows:

PART 97--STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES

0
1. The authority citation for part 97 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106, 40113, 40114, 40120,
44502, 44514, 44701, 44719, 44721-44722.

0
2. Part 97 is amended to read as follows:

Effective 30 JUN 2011

St. Paul Island, AK, St. Paul Island, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 36, Amdt 3A
Talladega, AL, Talladega Muni, ILS or LOC/DME RWY 3, Orig
Talladega, AL, Talladega Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Amdt 1
Talladega, AL, Talladega Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Amdt 1
Telluride, CO, Telluride Rgnl, LOC/DME RWY 9, Amdt 2
Telluride, CO, Telluride Rgnl, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 2
Telluride, CO, Telluride Rgnl, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 1
Venice, FL, Venice Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 1
Venice, FL, Venice Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1
Atlanta, GA, Dekalb-Peachtree, RNAV (RNP) RWY 2R, Amdt 1
Cornelia, GA, Habersham County, NDB RWY 6, Amdt 2
Cornelia, GA, Habersham County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Amdt 1
Cornelia, GA, Habersham County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Amdt 1
Thomson, GA, Thomson-McDuffie County, ILS OR LOC/NDB RWY 10, Amdt 1
Thomson, GA, Thomson-McDuffie County, NDB RWY 10, Amdt 1
Thomson, GA, Thomson-McDuffie County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig
Thomson, GA, Thomson-McDuffie County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig
Thomson, GA, Thomson-McDuffie County, VOR/DME-A, Amdt 4
Centerville, IA, Centerville Muni, NDB OR GPS RWY 16, Amdt 1B,
CANCELLED
Centerville, IA, Centerville Muni, NDB OR GPS RWY 34, Amdt 1B,
CANCELLED
Creston, IA, Creston Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Amdt 1
Creston, IA, Creston Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, Amdt 1
Mason City, IA, Mason City Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 2
Mason City, IA, Mason City Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Amdt 1
Mason City, IA, Mason City Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 1
Dixon, IL, Dixon Muni-Charles R. Walgreen Field, Takeoff Minimums
and Obstacle DP, Amdt 3
Burlington, KS, Coffey County, GPS RWY 18, Orig, CANCELLED
Burlington, KS, Coffey County, GPS RWY 36, Orig, CANCELLED
Burlington, KS, Coffey County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Orig
Burlington, KS, Coffey County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Orig
Lawrence, MA, Lawrence Muni, ILS OR LOC Y RWY 5, Amdt 4
Lawrence, MA, Lawrence Muni, ILS OR LOC Z RWY 5, Orig
Lawrence, MA, Lawrence Muni, NDB RWY 5, Amdt 6
Lawrence, MA, Lawrence Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig
Lawrence, MA, Lawrence Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Lawrence, MA, Lawrence Muni, VOR RWY 23, Amdt 11
Frederick, MD, Frederick Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 3
Augusta, ME, Augusta State, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 3
Minneapolis, MN, Flying Cloud, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28L, Amdt 1
Rochester, MN, Rochester Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Amdt 2
Rochester, MN, Rochester Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1
Rochester, MN, Rochester Intl, VOR/DME RWY 20, Amdt 14
Two Harbors, MN, Richard B Helgeson, GPS RWY 24, Orig, CANCELLED
Two Harbors, MN, Richard B Helgeson, RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Orig
Two Harbors, MN, Richard B Helgeson, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Orig
Olive Branch, MS, Olive Branch, LOC/DME RWY 36, Orig
Kenansville, NC, Duplin County, GPS RWY 5, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Kenansville, NC, Duplin County, GPS RWY 23, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Kenansville, NC, Duplin County, LOC/NDB RWY 23, Amdt 1
Kenansville, NC, Duplin County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig
Kenansville, NC, Duplin County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Salisbury, NC, Rowan County, ILS OR LOC RWY 20, Amdt 1
Salisbury, NC, Rowan County, NDB RWY 20, Amdt 1
Salisbury, NC, Rowan County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 2, Amdt 1
Salisbury, NC, Rowan County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 20, Amdt 1
Salisbury, NC, Rowan County, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
1
Hillsboro, ND, Hillsboro Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 16, Amdt 1
Hillsboro, ND, Hillsboro Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 34, Amdt 1
Beatrice, NE, Beatrice Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Amdt 1
Beatrice, NE, Beatrice Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 18, Amdt 2
Beatrice, NE, Beatrice Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Amdt 1
Beatrice, NE, Beatrice Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 36, Amdt 2
Beatrice, NE, Beatrice Muni, VOR RWY 14, Amdt 18
Beatrice, NE, Beatrice Muni, VOR RWY 18, Amdt 2
Beatrice, NE, Beatrice Muni, VOR RWY 36, Amdt 9
Central City, NE, Central City Muni-Larry Reineke Field, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 16, Orig
Central City, NE, Central City Muni-Larry Reineke Field, RNAV (GPS)
RWY 34, Orig
Central City, NE, Central City Muni-Larry Reineke Field, Takeoff
Minimums and Obstacle DP, Orig
Millville, NJ, Millville Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY 10, Amdt 2
Brockport, NY, Ledgedale Airpark, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Amdt 1
Schenectady, NY, Schenectady County, GPS RWY 22, Orig-D, CANCELLED
Schenectady, NY, Schenectady County, GPS RWY 28, Orig-B, CANCELLED
Schenectady, NY, Schenectady County, ILS OR LOC RWY 4, Amdt 5
Schenectady, NY, Schenectady County, NDB RWY 22, Amdt 16
Schenectady, NY, Schenectady County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Orig
Schenectady, NY, Schenectady County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig
Schenectady, NY, Schenectady County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Orig
Schenectady, NY, Schenectady County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig
Watertown, NY, Watertown Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig
Watertown, NY, Watertown Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig
Beaver Falls, PA, Beaver County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 10, Orig
Beaver Falls, PA, Beaver County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 28, Orig
Beaver Falls, PA, Beaver County, VOR RWY 28, Amdt 10
Lehighton, PA, Jake Arner Memorial, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Amdt 1A
Lehighton, PA, Jake Arner Memorial, RNAV (GPS) RWY 26, Amdt 1A
Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia Intl, CONVERGING ILS RWY 17, Amdt 6
Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 17, Amdt 8
Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 3
Philadelphia, PA, Philadelphia Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 3
York, PA, York, NDB RWY 17, Amdt 7
York, PA, York, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Amdt 2
York, PA, York, RNAV (GPS) RWY 35, Amdt 1
Gettysburg, SD, Gettysburg Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Amdt 1
Gettysburg, SD, Gettysburg Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Amdt 1
Mobridge, SD, Mobridge Muni, NDB RWY 12, Amdt 2, CANCELLED
Mobridge, SD, Mobridge Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 30, Amdt 1
Mobridge, SD, Mobridge Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
1
Spearfish, SD, Black Hills-Clyde Ice Field, GPS RWY 12, Orig-D,
CANCELLED
Spearfish, SD, Black Hills-Clyde Ice Field, NDB-A, Amdt 1
Spearfish, SD, Black Hills-Clyde Ice Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 13, Orig
Spearfish, SD, Black Hills-Clyde Ice Field, RNAV (GPS) RWY 31, Orig
Sturgis, SD, Sturgis Muni, GPS RWY 29, Orig-A, CANCELLED

Sturgis, SD, Sturgis Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 11, Orig
Sturgis, SD, Sturgis Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 29, Orig
Sturgis, SD, Sturgis Muni, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1
Dyersburg, TN, Dyersburg Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 4, Amdt 2
Dyersburg, TN, Dyersburg Rgnl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 22, Amdt 1
Dyersburg, TN, Dyersburg Rgnl, VOR-A, Amdt 18
Dyersburg, TN, Dyersburg Rgnl, VOR/DME RWY 4, Amdt 4
Memphis, TN, General Dewitt Spain, GPS RWY 17, Orig-A, CANCELLED
Memphis, TN, General Dewitt Spain, RNAV (GPS) RWY 17, Orig
Morristown, TN, Moore-Murrell, NDB RWY 5, Amdt 5
Morristown, TN, Moore-Murrell, RNAV (GPS) RWY 5, Orig
Morristown, TN, Moore-Murrell, RNAV (GPS) RWY 23, Orig
Morristown, TN, Moore-Murrell, SDF RWY 5, Amdt 5
Waverly, TN, Humphreys County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 3, Orig
Waverly, TN, Humphreys County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 21, Orig
Wendover, UT, Wendover, RNAV (GPS) RWY 8, Orig
Wendover, UT, Wendover, RNAV (GPS)-C, Orig
Waynesboro, VA, Eagle's Nest, RNAV (GPS) RWY 6, Orig
Waynesboro, VA, Eagle's Nest, RNAV (GPS) RWY 24, Orig
Highgate, VT, Franklin County State, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1, Amdt 3
Highgate, VT, Franklin County State, RNAV (GPS) RWY 19, Amdt 1
Highgate, VT, Franklin County State, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle
DP, Amdt 1
Highgate, VT, Franklin County State, VOR/DME RWY 19, Amdt 5
Springfield, VT, Hartness State (Springfield), Takeoff Minimums and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 3
Ladysmith, WI, Rusk County, NDB RWY 32, Amdt 3
Ladysmith, WI, Rusk County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 14, Orig
Ladysmith, WI, Rusk County, RNAV (GPS) RWY 32, Orig
Marshfield, WI, Marshfield Muni, NDB RWY 5, Amdt 14
Marshfield, WI, Marshfield Muni, NDB RWY 16, Amdt 10
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, ILS OR LOC RWY 19R, Amdt 11
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 19R, Amdt 1
Milwaukee, WI, General Mitchell Intl, RNAV (GPS) Y RWY 19R, Orig,
CANCELLED
Sparta, WI, Sparta/Fort McCoy, NDB RWY 29, Amdt 4
Sparta, WI, Sparta/Fort McCoy, RNAV (GPS) RWY 11, Amdt 1
Sparta, WI, Sparta/Fort McCoy, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP,
Amdt 2

On MAY 04, 2011 (76 FR 25233) the FAA published an Amendment in Docket
No. 30779, Amdt 3422 to Part 97 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
under section 97.33. The following entries, published in TL 11-11
effective for 30 JUNE 2011, are hereby rescinded:

Anchorage, AK, Merill Field, RNAV (GPS)-A, Amdt 1
Anchorage, AK, Merill Field, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt
1
Big Lake, AK, Big Lake, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7, Amdt 1
Big Lake, AK, Big Lake, RNAV (GPS) RWY 25, Amdt 1
Big Lake, AK, Big Lake, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 2
Big Lake, AK, Big Lake, VOR RWY 7, Amdt 7
Galena, AK, Edward G. Pitka Sr, VOR/DME RWY 7, Amdt 7B
Galena, AK, Edward G. Pitka Sr, VOR/DME RWY 25, Amdt 10B
Kenai, AK, Kenai Muni, ILS OR LOC RWY 19R, Amdt 4
Kenai, AK, Kenai Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 1L, Amdt 2
Kenai, AK, Kenai Muni, RNAV (GPS) RWY 19R, Amdt 2
Kenai, AK, Kenai Muni, VOR RWY 19R, Amdt 19
Kenai, AK, Kenai Muni, VOR/DME RWY 1L, Amdt 8
Wasilla, AK, Wasilla, Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle DP, Amdt 1

On MAY 16, 2011 (76 FR 28172) the FAA published an Amendment in Docket
No. 30781, Amdt 3424 to Part 97 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
under section 97.33. The following entries, published in TL 11-12
effective for 30 JUNE 2011, are hereby rescinded:

Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, ILS OR LOC/DME RWY 7L,
ILS RWY 7L (SA CAT I), ILS RWY 7L (CAT II), Amdt 2
Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, ILS RWY 15, Amdt 5
Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 7L, Amdt 2
Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, RNAV (GPS) RWY 15, Amdt 2
Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, Takeoff Minimum and
Obstacle DP, Amdt 6
Anchorage, AK, Ted Stevens Anchorage Intl, VOR RWY 7R, Amdt 13A,
CANCELLED
Kodiak, AK, Kodiak, ILS OR LOC/DME Y RWY 25, Amdt 1A
Kodiak, AK, Kodiak, VOR Y RWY 25, Amdt 1A
Soldotna, AK, Soldotna, NDB RWY 7, Amdt 2
Soldotna, AK, Soldotna, NDB RWY 25, Amdt 3
Soldotna, AK, Soldotna, VOR-A, Amdt 7

On MAY 26, 2011 (76 FR 30536) the FAA published an Amendment in Docket
No. 30783, Amdt 3426 to Part 97 of the Federal Aviation Regulations
under section 97.33. The following entries, published in TL 11-13
effective for 30 JUNE 2011, are hereby rescinded:

Valdez, AK, Valdez Pioneer Field, LDA/DME-H, Orig-A

[FR Doc. 2011-13955 Filed 6-15-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 17, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 64073-64075]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24942]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0707; FRL-9059-02-R4]

Air Plan Approval; North Carolina: Mecklenburg Ambient Air
Quality Standards

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a
State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision to the Mecklenburg County
portion of the North Carolina SIP, hereinafter referred to as the
Mecklenburg Local Implementation Plan (LIP). The revision was submitted
by the State of North Carolina, through the North Carolina Division Air
Quality (NCDAQ), on behalf of Mecklenburg County Air Quality via a
letter dated April 24, 2020, and was received by EPA on June 19, 2020.
The revision updates several Mecklenburg County Air Pollution Control
Ordinance (MCAPCO) ambient air quality rules incorporated into the LIP
and adds one new rule for fine particulate matter (PM2.5).
EPA is approving these changes pursuant to the Clean Air Act (CAA or
Act).

DATES: This rule is effective December 17, 2021.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0707. All documents in the docket
are listed on the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the
index, some information may not be publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard
copy at the Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., excluding
Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pearlene Williams, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562-9144. Ms. Williams can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    The Mecklenburg County LIP was originally submitted to EPA on June
14, 1990, and EPA approved the plan on May 2, 1991. See 56 FR 20140.
Mecklenburg County prepared three submittals in order to modify the LIP
for, among other things, general consistency with the North Carolina
SIP.\1\ The three submittals were submitted to EPA as follows: NCDAQ
transmitted the October 25, 2017, submittal to EPA but withdrew it from
review through a letter dated February 15, 2019. On April 24, 2020,
NCDAQ resubmitted the October 25, 2017, update to EPA and also
submitted the January 21, 2016, and January 14, 2019, updates. Due to
an inconsistency with public notice at the local level, these
submittals were withdrawn from EPA through a letter dated February 15,
2019. Mecklenburg County corrected this error, and NCDAQ submitted the
updates in a revision dated April 24, 2020.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The Mecklenburg County, North Carolina revision that is
dated April 24, 2020, and received by EPA on June 19, 2020, is
comprised of three previous submittals--one dated January 21, 2016;
one dated October 25, 2017; and one dated January 14, 2019.
    \2\ EPA notes that the April 24, 2020, submittal was received by
EPA on June 19, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On September 24, 2021, EPA published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) proposing to approve the April 24, 2020, SIP revision
regarding updates to Mecklenburg's ambient air quality standard rules,
as well as the addition of a PM2.5 rule. The NPRM provides
additional detail regarding the background and rationale for EPA's
action. Comments on the NPRM were due on or before October 25, 2021.
EPA received no comments on the September 24, NPRM.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of Mecklenburg
County Pollution Control Ordinance Rules 2.0401--Purpose; 2.0402--
Sulfur Oxides; 2.0404--Carbon Monoxide; 2.0405--Ozone; 2.0407--Nitrogen
Dioxide; 2.0408--Lead; and 2.0410--PM2.5 Particulate Matter, all which
have an effective date of December 18, 2018; as well as Rule 2.0403--
Total Suspended Particulates, with an effective date of December 15,
2015. EPA has made and will continue to make these materials generally
available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 Office
(please contact the person identified in the For Further Information
Contact section of this preamble for more information). Therefore,
these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP,
have been incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully
federally enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the
effective date of the final rulemaking of EPA's approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next update to the SIP compilation.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Final Action

    EPA is finalizing regulatory text that incorporates into the LIP
changes to MCAPCO Rules 2.0401--Purpose; 2.0402--Sulfur Oxides;
2.0404--Carbon Monoxide; 2.0405--Ozone; 2.0407--Nitrogen Dioxide; and
2.0408--Lead, as well as the addition of Rule 2.0410--PM2.5 Particulate
Matter, all which have an effective date of December 18, 2018.
Additionally, EPA is approving and incorporating into the LIP Rule
2.0403 --Total Suspended Particulates with an effective date of
December 15, 2015. EPA is taking final action to approve these changes
because they are consistent with the CAA.

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by January 18, 2022. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. See section 307(b)(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: November 8, 2021.
John Blevins,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR part 52
as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart II--North Carolina

0
2. In Sec.  52.1770, amend the table in paragraph (c)(3) under
``Section 2.0400 Ambient Air Quality Standards'' by:
0
a. Revising the entries for ``Section 2.0401,'' ``Section 2.0402,''
``Section 2.0403,'' ``Section 2.0404,'' ``Section 2.0405,'' ``Section
2.0407,'' and ``Section 2.0408,'' and
0
b. Adding a new entry for ``Rule 2.0410'' in numerical order after the
entry for ``Section 2.0409.''
    The revisions read as follows:

Sec.  52.1770  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                 (3) EPA Approved Mecklenburg County Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        State        EPA approval
        State citation            Title/subject    effective date        date                Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                         Article 2.0000 Air Pollution Control Regulations and Procedures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Section 2.0400 Ambient Air Quality Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 2.0401...................  Purpose..........      12/18/2018  11/17/2021,
                                                                    [Insert
                                                                    citation of
                                                                    publication].
Rule 2.0402...................  Sulfur Oxides....      12/18/2018  11/17/2021,
                                                                    [Insert
                                                                    citation of
                                                                    publication].
Rule 2.0403...................  Total Suspended        12/15/2015  11/17/2021,
                                 Particulates.                      [Insert
                                                                    citation of
                                                                    publication].
Rule 2.0404...................  Carbon Monoxide..      12/18/2018  11/17/2021,
                                                                    [Insert
                                                                    citation of
                                                                    publication].
Rule 2.0405...................  Ozone............      12/18/2018  11/17/2021,
                                                                    [Insert
                                                                    citation of
                                                                    publication].
Rule 2.0407...................  Nitrogen Dioxide.      12/18/2018  11/17/2021,
                                                                    [Insert
                                                                    citation of
                                                                    publication].
Rule 2.0408...................  Lead.............      12/18/2018  11/17/2021,
                                                                    [Insert
                                                                    citation of
                                                                    publication].

                                                  * * * * * * *
Rule 2.0410...................  PM2.5 Particulate      12/18/2018  11/17/2021,
                                 Matter.                            [Insert
                                                                    citation of
                                                                    publication].

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-24942 Filed 11-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P