[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 11 (Tuesday, January 18, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2538-2539]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00571]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0742; Airspace Docket No. 21-ASW-16]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment Class E Airspace; Bonham, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the Class E airspace at Bonham, TX. This
action is the result of an airspace review due to the decommissioning
of the Bonham non-directional beacon (NDB). The geographic coordinates
of the airport are also being updated to coincide with the FAA's
aeronautical database.

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, March 24, 2022. The Director of the Federal

Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR
part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order JO 7400.11 and
publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of FAA Order JO 7400.11F at NARA, email:
[email protected] or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Jones Field, Bonham, TX, to support instrument flight
rule operations at this airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (86 FR 59067; October 26, 2021) for Docket No. FAA-2021-0742
to amend the Class E airspace at Bonham, TX. Interested parties were
invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written
comments on the proposal to the FAA. No comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class
E airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in FAA Order JO 7400.11.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021, and effective September
15, 2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 amends the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Jones Field,
Bonham, TX, by removing the Bonham VORTAC and the associated extension
as it is no longer required; adds an extension 2 miles each side of the
002[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 6.4-mile radius of
from the airport to 9.6 miles north of the airport; removes the city
associated with the airport to comply with updates to FAA Order
7400.2N, Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters; and updates the
geographic coordinates of the airport to coincide with the FAA's
aeronautical database.
    This action is the result of an airspace review due to the
decommissioning of the Bonham NDB which provided guidance to instrument
procedures at this airport.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASW TX E5 Bonham, TX [Amended]

Jones Field, TX
    (Lat. 33[deg]36'47'' N, long. 96[deg]10'46'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.4-mile radius of Jones Field, and within 2 miles each
side of the 002[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the
6.4-mile radius to 9.6 miles north of the airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 10, 2022.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2022-00571 Filed 1-14-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 232 (Friday, December 3, 2010)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 75448-75449]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30366]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

49 CFR Parts 209, 213, 214, 215, 217, 218, 219, 220, 221, 222, 223,
224, 225, 227, 228, 229, 230, 231, 232, 233, 234, 235, 236, 238,
239, 240, and 241

[Docket No. FRA-2006-25274, Notice No. 3]
RIN 2130-ZA00

Revised Proposal for Revisions to the Schedules of Civil
Penalties for a Violation of a Federal Railroad Safety Law or Federal
Railroad Administration Safety Regulation or Order; Reopening and
Extending the Comment Period

AGENCY: Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Reopening and extending the comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to comments received from the Association of American
Railroads (AAR) during the initial comment period, FRA is reopening the
comment period for its proposal published on September 21, 2010. The
proposal, if adopted, would amend, line by line, FRA's schedules of
civil penalties issued as appendices to FRA's rail safety regulations,
as well as other guidance. AAR stated in its comments on the proposal
that FRA did not give the railroad industry adequate time to review all
the penalties listed in the proposal to determine if they match the
severity-scale criteria, which are also listed in the proposal.
Therefore, FRA is reopening and extending the comment period in order
to allow AAR more time to review the penalties in the severity scale
and to identify and comment more fully on which individual penalties do
not in its opinion satisfy the severity-scale criteria. FRA also seeks
further comments from other interested parties that were unable to
comment during the initial comment period. The comment period is
reopened until February 1, 2011.

DATES: Written comments must be received by February 1, 2011. Comments
received after that date will be considered to the extent possible
without incurring additional delay or expense.

ADDRESSES: Comments: Comments related to this Docket No. FRA 2006-
25274, Notice No. 3, may be submitted by any of the following methods:
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulatory Identification Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. Note that all comments received will be posted without
change to http://www.regulations.gov including any personal information
provided.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or to
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ron Hynes, Director, Office of Safety
Compliance and Assurance, Office of Railroad Safety, FRA, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590 (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>),
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or Brian Roberts, Trial Attorney, Office of Chief
Counsel, FRA, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Mail Stop 10, Washington, DC
20590 (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FRA's proposal to amend, line by line, FRA's
schedules of civil penalties as well as other guidance was published on
September 21, 2010 (75 FR 57598). The initial comment period closed on
October 21, 2010. During this 30-day comment period, FRA received
comments from both AAR and The American Short Line and Regional
Railroad Association. In its comments, AAR provided examples of
penalties in the proposal that it believed did not match the severity-
scale criteria. However, AAR also stated that FRA did not give it
adequate time to review all the penalties in the proposal and determine
whether they matched the severity-scale criteria. Therefore, FRA is
reopening the comment period to allow AAR an opportunity to comment on
these perceived inconsistencies more fully. FRA will address all other
comments made during the initial and additional comment period in the
final statement of agency policy.
    Privacy Act: FRA wishes to inform all potential commenters that
anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments received
into any agency docket by the name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the edition of the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78), or you may visit http://regulations.gov/search/footer/privacyanduse.jsp.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on November 29, 2010.
Karen J. Rae,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2010-30366 Filed 12-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 94 (Wednesday, May 15, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21741-21747]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09844]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

49 CFR Part 576

[Docket No. NHTSA-2019-0035]
RIN 2127-AL81

Record Retention Requirement

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This proposal is being issued pursuant to the Fixing America's
Surface Transportation (FAST) Act which requires the Secretary of
Transportation (Secretary) to extend the period of time manufacturers
of motor vehicles, tires and child restraint systems must retain
records concerning defects and malfunctions that may be related to
motor vehicle safety under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle
Safety Act (Safety Act). Section 24403 of the FAST Act directs the
Secretary to issue a rule increasing the time of record retention to a
period not less than ten years, instead of five years as presently
required under the regulatory provisions. Pursuant to its delegated
authority, NHTSA is proposing to update our regulations in accordance
with this mandate. This proposed update is not intended to change the
scope of the existing rule, other than as specifically described in
this notice, but is intended to aid in efficiently and effectively
improving the agency's ability to identify safety defects and
noncompliances.

DATES: You should submit comments early enough to ensure that Docket
Management receives them not later than July 15, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit written comments to the docket number
identified in the heading of this document by any of the following
methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Regardless of how you submit your comments, please be sure you
mention the docket number of this document located at the top of this
notice in your correspondence.
    You may call the Docket at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Note that all comments received will be posted without change to
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. Please see the Privacy Act discussion below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement, in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000. 65 FR 19477-78.
    Confidential Information: If you wish to submit any information
under a claim of confidentiality, you should submit two copies of your
complete submission, including the information you claim to be
confidential business information, and one copy with the claimed
confidential business information deleted from the document, to the
Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given below under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT. In addition, you should submit two copies, from
which you have deleted the claimed confidential business information,
to Docket Management at the address given above under ADDRESSES. When
you send a comment containing information claimed to be confidential
business information, you should follow the procedures set forth in 49
CFR part 512 and include a cover letter setting forth the information
specified in our confidential business information regulation. 49 CFR
part 512.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions for accessing the dockets or go to the street
address listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Healy, Trial Attorney, Office
of the Chief Counsel, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590 (telephone: 202-366-
2992).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Executive Summary
II. Record Retention Requirements Under the Safety Act Prior to the
FAST Act
III. NHTSA's Proposed Interpretation of the FAST Act Record
Retention Requirement
IV. Regulatory Analyses and Notices

I. Executive Summary

    The FAST Act was signed into law on December 4, 2015. Public Law
114-94. Section 24403 of the FAST Act directs the Secretary of
Transportation to amend the amount of time manufacturers of motor
vehicles, tires and child restraint systems are required to maintain
records that contain information concerning malfunctions that may be
related to motor vehicle safety. In the final rule, the Secretary must
lengthen the time that manufacturers must maintain these records to not
less than ten years from the date the records were generated or
acquired. Public Law 114-94, sec. 24403(a). Based on NHTSA's experience
investigating potential defects and overseeing recalls, we have
determined that a ten-year records retention requirement would ensure
that the agency's investigative needs are meet without unnecessarily
burdening manufacturers of motor vehicles and equipment. In this NPRM,
NHTSA is proposing to extend the record retention requirement for
records required to be maintained under 49 CFR 576.6 to ten years.
    Since the language of the statute grants the Secretary discretion
to extend the period during which manufacturers must retain record
beyond ten years, we also seek comment on whether there is
justification for extending the time that manufacturers are required to
maintain the records specified in 49 CFR 576.6 to fifteen, twenty or
twenty-five years.
    This rulemaking would not require manufacturers to retain any new
information; it would merely require manufacturers to retain
information they are already required to retain under 49 CFR part 576
for a longer period of time. This rulemaking also would not extend the
time period that manufacturers of motor vehicles and motor equipment
are required to retain records underlying information reported under 49
CFR part 579.
    In accordance with the FAST Act, the extended time period would
apply to records in manufacturers' possession on the effective date of
the rule and records generated or acquired in the future. Public Law
114-94, sec. 24403(b). Access to records concerning defects and
malfunctions that may be related to motor vehicle safety is essential
for NHTSA to fulfill the Safety Act objective of identifying safety-
related defects and noncompliances.

II. Record Retention Requirements Under the Safety Act Prior to the
FAST Act

    Part 576 requires manufacturers of motor vehicles, tires, and child
restraint systems to retain ``all documentary materials, films, tapes,
and other information-storing media that contain information concerning
defects and malfunctions that may be related to motor vehicle safety.''
49 CFR 576.6. These records must be maintained for use in the
investigation and disposition of defects related to motor vehicle
safety or noncompliance with Safety Act requirements. 49 CFR 576.2. The
requirement applies to motor vehicle manufacturers for records
generated or acquired after August 16, 1969 and to motor vehicle
equipment manufacturers for records in their possession, generated, or
acquired on or after August 9, 2002. 49 CFR 576.3. Manufacturers of
motor vehicles, child restraint systems, and tires must currently keep
the records required to be maintained by 49 CFR 576.6 for five years
after they are generated or acquired. 49 CFR 576.5(a). Manufacturers of
motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment must also keep documents
underlying reporting required by 49 CFR part 579 for five years after
they are generated or acquired. 49 CFR 576.5(b). However; according to
49 CFR 576.5(c), manufacturers of motor vehicles and motor vehicle
equipment are not required to keep copies of documents reported to
NHTSA as required by 49 CFR parts 573, 577, and 579. No manufacturer is
required to keep duplicates according to 49 CFR 576.7.

III. NHTSA's Proposed Retention Requirement

    The FAST Act vests authority in the Secretary to increase the
required time manufacturers must retain records under the Safety Act.
Pursuant to 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8, this authority has been delegated to
NHTSA. The provision of the FAST Act requiring an extension of the
record retention requirement applicable to motor vehicle and motor
vehicle equipment manufacturers gave the Secretary discretion to
determine the amount of time records are kept as long as the time is
``a period not less than ten years.'' Public Law 114-94, sec. 24403(a).
NHTSA has determined that ten years is the appropriate length of time
that manufacturers of motor vehicles, tires, and child restraints
should be required to retain records concerning defects and
malfunctions that may be related to motor vehicle safety.
    When a trend in consumer complaints or other data indicates a
potential safety-related defect, NHTSA relies on information included
in manufacturers' records, along with other agency data, to determine
whether or not to open a formal defect investigation (as authorized by
title 49 U.S.C. chapter 301--Motor Vehicle Safety). Our proposed
approach to extend the time manufacturers of motor vehicles, tires and
child restraint systems must retain records is based on NHTSA's
experience with the increasing age of motor vehicles and motor vehicle
equipment and the importance of records from manufacturers, balanced
against our desire to avoid unnecessarily burdening manufacturers of
motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment.
    Based on our evaluation of the foregoing factors, NHTSA is
proposing to extend the records retention period for records required
to be maintained under 49 CFR 576.6 to ten years. NHTSA contends that a
records retention period of ten years will ensure that manufacturers
will preserve records that NHTSA needs to conduct defect and
noncompliance investigations without imposing an undue record retention
burden on manufacturers.
    Increases in the age of the vehicle fleet since the time the five-
year records retention requirement was established in 1974 \1\ and
Congress' extension of the period during which vehicle and equipment
manufacturers are required to provide a free remedy under 49 U.S.C.
30120 to fifteen years after first purchase both support extending the
record retention period in part 576. The average age of the United
States light vehicle fleet has been trending upward reaching 11.6 years
in 2016.\2\ In 1974 the average age of passenger cars was 5.7 years and
the average age of trucks was 7 years.\3\ As of 2015, there are 44
million vehicles on the road between sixteen and twenty-four years old
and an additional 14 million vehicles that are at least twenty-five
years old.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 39 FR 30045 (Aug. 20, 1974).
    \2\ Vehicles Getting Older: Average Age of Light Cars and Trucks
in U.S. Rises Again in 2016 to 11.6 Years, HIS Markit Says, IHS
Markit (Nov. 22, 2016), https://news.ihsmarkit.com/press-release/automotive/vehicles-getting-older-average-age-light-cars-and-trucks-us-rises-again-201 (last visited Sept. 19, 2018).
    \3\ Average Age of Automobiles and Trucks in Use, 1970-1999,
Fed. Highway Admin., https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/onh00/line3.htm
(last visited Sept. 19, 2018). From 1977 to 2017 the average of
medium and heavy duty trucks increased from 11.6 years to 17.3 years
and the average age of recreational vehicles increased from 4.5
years to 15.8 years. See Average Age of Automobiles and Trucks in
Operation in the United States, Bureau of Transp. Statistics,
https://www.bts.gov/content/average-age-automobiles-and-trucks-operation-united-states (last visited Sept. 19, 2018) .
    \4\ Average age of cars on U.S. roads breaks record, USA Today
(July 29, 2015), http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/2015/07/29/new-car-sales-soaring-but-cars-getting-older-too/30821191/ (last visited
May 11, 2018) (citing an IHS Automotive study).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA has tentatively concluded that extending the records
retention requirements for records required to be maintained under 49
CFR 576.6 to ten years would ensure that NHTSA has access to records
pertaining to an investigation since the record retention period begins
the date the records were generated. It is NHTSA's experience that in
the vast majority of cases, the records most pertinent to a defect
investigation will be those generated in the previous ten years because
those are the records more likely to show an emerging defect trend.
    While justified in this instance based on the age of the vehicle
fleet, a ten-year long records retention period is of significant
length when compared to records retention periods of similar scope of
other operating administrations with in US DOT \5\ and federal agencies
that regulate motor vehicles and child products.\6\ The agency believes
it should only move beyond the ten-year period required in the FAST Act
if it has clear evidence that additional time is needed. NHTSA
tentatively concludes that the benefits of extending the records
retention period beyond ten years do not outweigh any burden or costs
to manufacturers that would result in a lengthened retention period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Federal Railroad Administration requires railroads to
retain records on employee injuries and illnesses and highway user
injuries for five years after the end of the calendar year to which
they relate. 49 CFR 225.27. The Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration requires companies to retain certain records related
to employee drug and alcohol testing for five years. 49 CFR 382.401.
    \6\ The Consumer Product Safety Commission requires
manufacturers of products subject to a children's product safety
rule to maintain records on certification testing and design changes
for five years. 16 CFR 1107.26. The Environmental Protection Agency
requires manufacturers to retain records related to certification
testing for a period of five years. 40 CFR 600.005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to extending the record retention period applicable to
manufacturers of motor vehicles, the FAST Act also requires us to
extend the records retention requirements applicable to child restraint
and tire manufacturers. While Congress did not provide discretion to
establish a shorter records retention period for child restraint system
and tire manufacturers, the manner in which these items differ from
motor vehicles means that the costs and burdens of extending the
records retention period in Part 576 for manufacturers of child
restraints and

tires will be different than the costs and burdens to motor vehicle
manufacturers.
    Like motor vehicle manufacturers, manufacturers of child restraint
systems are required to provide a free remedy for fifteen years after
purchase.\7\ 49 U.S.C. 30120(g). However, manufacturers of child
restraint systems typically label the restraint with an expiration date
after which the manufacturer recommends that caregivers no longer use
the restraint. The expiration date provided by the manufacturer is
usually six to seven years after the date of manufacture of the
restraint. Manufacturers of tires are required to provide a free remedy
for a period of five years after the purchase of the tire. We seek
comments on the costs and burdens of the proposed rule to manufacturers
of child restraints and tires.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ While there are limits in the Safety Act on the period for
which manufacturers are required to provide a free remedy, there is
no limit on the time for which NHTSA can order a manufacturer to
notify consumers of a defect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA has previously considered extending the records retention
requirements in part 576 to correspond with the free remedy period in
the Safety Act and declined to do so. After issuing a final rule in
1995 to increase the records retention requirement in part 576 from
five years to eight years to correspond to the free remedy period in
effect at the time, NHTSA rescinded the rule and restored the five-year
records retention requirement.\8\ At the time, NHTSA determined that
the costs of extending the records requirement to eight years outweigh
the benefits.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 61 FR 274 (Jan. 4, 1996).
    \9\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    When the Transportation Recall Enhancement, Accountability, and
Documentation Act, Public Law 106-414, extended the free remedy period
applicable to motor vehicles and equipment to ten years, NHTSA proposed
extending the record retention requirements in part 576 applicable to
motor vehicle manufacturers and child restraint manufacturers from five
years to ten years.\10\ The comments received in response to the
proposal asserted that there was no justification for extending the
records retention requirement to ten years and that records generated
in the last five years are the records most relevant to discovering a
defect.\11\ In deciding to retain the existing retention period at that
time, NHTSA concluded that the agency's investigative needs were
adequately met by the five-year records retention period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 67 FR 45873, 45868 (July 10, 2002).
    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Lengthening the record retention period in part 576 beyond ten
years would result in manufacturers being required to retain records
generated late in the life of a vehicle, likely well after any defect
trend has emerged. NHTSA also contends that manufacturers have an
incentive to retain relevant records longer than required by part 576
in order to properly document the scope of any potential recalls and
for other business purposes. Based on NHTSA's experience investigating
potential defects and overseeing recalls, we have found that many
manufacturers of motor vehicles and equipment currently retain some of
the records subject to this rule for periods of time longer than the
current five-year minimum.
    As the length of time that vehicles remain on the road has
increased in recent years, the amount of information generated and
retained by vehicle manufacturers has also increased.\12\ Extending the
records retention requirement increases the total volume of information
that must be stored either electronically or physically. NHTSA expects
most records retained under part 576 to be in electronic format. While
NHTSA anticipates the costs of electronic storage attributable to this
proposal to be minimal, NHTSA does not believe that there is currently
justification to extend the records retention requirements in part 576
beyond the length required by the FAST Act. For these reasons, NHTSA
believes that extending the records retention period in part 576 to ten
years best achieves NHTSA's need to preserve access to records for
investigations while minimizing any costs to manufacturers of retaining
records.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Confidential Business Information. 81 FR 57, 51 (Jan.
4, 2016) (discussing the increase in volume of electronic
information submitted to NHTSA during defect investigations).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition to requiring manufacturers of motor vehicles, child
restraint systems, and tires to retain all records involving
information concerning malfunctions that may be related to motor
vehicle safety, Part 576 also requires motor vehicle and motor vehicle
equipment manufacturers to retain all the records underlying
information reported under 49 CFR part 579. Part 579 requires that
motor vehicle, child restraint system and tires manufacturers with
certain production volumes report production information; information
on incidents involving death and injury; and the number of property
damage claims, warranty claims, consumer claims and field reports
received by the manufacturer.\13\ 49 CFR 579.21-26. Motor vehicle, tire
and child restraint manufacturers who do not meet the production
thresholds to be required to report production information and the
number of property damage claims, warranty claims, consumer claims and
field reports they receive and manufacturers of other motor vehicle
equipment are required to report incidents involving death. 49 CFR
579.27.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Child restraint system manufacturers are not required to
report the number of property damage claims they received and tire
manufacturers are only required to report the number of property
damage claims and warranty adjustments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    NHTSA is not extending the period for which manufacturers are
required to retain records underlying information reported to NHTSA
pursuant to 49 CFR part 579 in this rulemaking. NHTSA contends that
most of the records related to part 579 reporting that manufacturers of
motor vehicles, tires, and child restraint systems are required to
retain pursuant to 49 CFR 576.5(b) must also be retained under 49 CFR
576.6. Thus, the effects of extending the time that records underlying
information reported under part 579 must be retained would be limited
to motor vehicle equipment manufacturers who do not manufacturer child
restraint systems or tires. NHTSA does not anticipate that the benefits
to NHTSA's programs of extending the record retention requirements for
the motor vehicle equipment manufacturers that do not have record
retention responsibilities under 49 CFR 576.6 would outweigh the added
burdens to these manufacturers of retaining records.
    NHTSA requests comment on manufacturers' current records retention
practices. NHTSA also requests comments on the burden of increasing the
records retention period for records required to be maintained by 49
CFR 576.6 to fifteen, twenty, or twenty-five years, any costs that
might be associated with storage of electronic records, and the total
volume of records retained pursuant to part 576 by a manufacturer.

IV. Regulatory Analyses and Notices

A. Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and DOT Regulatory
Policies and Procedures

    NHTSA has considered the impact of this rulemaking action under
Executive Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, and the DOT's regulatory
policies and procedures. This proposed rule was not reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866,
``Regulatory Planning and Review.'' It is not considered to be
significant under Executive Order 12866

or the Department's regulatory policies and procedures.
    This proposal would amend 49 CFR part 576 to require motor vehicle,
tire, and child restraint systems manufacturers to maintain records for
a longer period than the currently required five-year time period. This
proposed rule would not require manufacturers to maintain any records
they are not already required to maintain, but instead is designed to
lengthen the time manufacturers retain certain records. Extending the
period of time to ten years is expected to lead to various
unquantifiable benefits such as formalizing manufacturers' records
retention practices and ensuring that, in all instances, records that
must be retained under section 576.6 are available in the case of a
NHTSA investigation for a minimum of ten years.
    Based on NHTSA's experience conducting investigations and
overseeing recalls, NHTSA contends that most manufacturers of motor
vehicles subject to this proposal already retain records for a longer
period than currently specified in part 576. It is NHTSA's position
that those manufacturers of motor vehicles or equipment who do
currently retain records for longer than ten years would be able to
adjust their record retention systems in response to this rulemaking
with minimal cost. Because we expect any costs, benefits, or savings
associated with this rulemaking to be minimal, we have not prepared a
separate economic analysis for this rulemaking.

B. Executive Order 13771

    Executive Order 13771, titled ``Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs,'' directs that, unless prohibited by law, whenever an
executive department or agency publicly proposes for notice and comment
or otherwise promulgates a new regulation, it shall identify at least
two existing regulations to be repealed. In addition, any new
incremental costs associated with new regulations shall, to the extent
permitted by law, be offset by the elimination of existing costs. Only
those rules deemed significant under section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' are subject to these
requirements. As discussed above, this rule is not a significant rule
under Executive Order 12866 and, accordingly, is not subject to the
offset requirements of 13771.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    In compliance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq., NHTSA has evaluated the effects of this action on small entities.
I hereby certify that this proposed rule would not have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The proposed rule
would affect manufacturers of motor vehicles, tires and child restraint
systems, a few of which may qualify as small entities. Such
manufacturers are expected to have fewer records, because they produce
fewer motor vehicles, tires and child restraint systems than the larger
manufacturers. Accordingly, the burden imposed on smaller manufacturers
to retain these records should be small. In fact, NHTSA believes there
would be some years during which the small manufacturers would not be
required to retain any records under this regulation. Additionally,
this proposed rule will merely extend how long manufacturers keep the
required records, amounting to a minimal impact on small businesses.
Thus, NHTSA believes that the regulation does not impose a significant
burden on small manufacturers.

D. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)

    NHTSA has examined today's rule pursuant to Executive Order 13132
(64 FR 43255, Aug. 10, 1999) and concluded that no additional
consultation with States, local governments, or their representatives
is mandated beyond the rulemaking process. The agency has determined
that the rulemaking would not have sufficient federalism implications
to warrant consultation with State and local officials or the
preparation of a federalism summary impact statement. The proposed rule
would apply to manufacturers of motor vehicles and motor vehicle
equipment and would not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Thus, Executive Order 13132 is not implicated and
consultation with State and local officials is not required.

E. National Environmental Policy Act

    NHTSA has analyzed this proposed rule for the purposes of the
National Environmental Policy Act. The agency has determined that the
implementation of this action will not have any significant impact on
the quality of the human environment.

F. Paperwork Reduction Act

    Under the procedures established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501, et. seq.), Federal agencies must obtain
approval from the OMB for each collection of information they conduct,
sponsor, or require through regulations. A person is not required to
respond to a collection of information by a Federal agency unless the
collection displays a valid OMB clearance number. This proposal would
lengthen the time that manufacturers must retain certain records, which
is considered to be an information collection requirement, as that term
is defined by the OMB in 5 CFR part 1320.
    In compliance with the PRA, we announce that NHTSA is seeking
comment on a revision of a currently approved collection.
    Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).
    Title: 49 CFR part 576, Record Retention.
    Type of Request: Revision of a currently approved collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2127-0042.
    Form Number: The collection of this information uses no standard
form.
    Requested Expiration Date of Approval: Three years from the date of
approval.
    Summary of the Collection of Information: Manufacturers must retain
certain records for a period of five years from which they were created
or acquired. 49 CFR part 576. NHTSA requires manufacturers of motor
vehicles, tires, and child restraint systems to retain one copy of all
records that contain information concerning malfunctions that may be
related to motor vehicle safety for a period of five calendar years
after the record is generated or acquired by the manufacturer under 49
CFR part 576. Manufacturers of motor vehicles and equipment must also
retain for five years the underlying records related to early warning
reporting (EWR) information submitted under 49 CFR part 579. The
proposed rule would amend part 576 to require the manufacturers of
motor vehicles, tires and child restraint systems to retain all records
that contain information concerning malfunctions that may be related to
motor vehicle safety for ten years instead of five.
Description of the Need for the Information and Use of the Information
    The information collection supports the Department's Strategic goal
of safety. The records that are required to be retained per 49 CFR part
576 are used to promptly identify potential safety-related defects in
motor vehicles and motor vehicle equipment in the United States. When a
trend in incidents arising from a potentially safety-related defect is
discovered, NHTSA relies on this information, along with other agency
data, to determine whether or not to open a formal defect investigation
(as

authorized by Title 49 U.S.C. chapter 301--Motor Vehicle Safety). NHTSA
normally becomes aware of possible safety-related defects because it
receives consumer complaints.
    Agency experience has shown that manufacturers receive
significantly more consumer complaints than does the agency. This is
because the consumer with the product does not know whether their
particular vehicle or equipment has a problem that is common with an
entire group of vehicles or equipment. Whereas consumers know the
manufacturer of their vehicle or equipment, relatively few know how to
file a complaint with the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration. Complaints filed with the manufacturer give the agency
a fair indication of how widespread the potential problem may be.
    Additionally, consumer complaints may contain information relating
to older vehicles and equipment that becomes increasingly useful to
NHTSA over time. A ten-year period of record retention aids the agency
in identifying possible safety-related defects in aging vehicles which
may become apparent through manufacturers' records. Since vehicle life
is ever increasing, the records related to older vehicles remain
pertinent. The value of the information in records relating to aging
vehicles may increase over time as NHTSA or manufacturers may become
aware of newly emerging safety-related defects. Extending the records
retention requirement to ten years will ensure that NHTSA has access to
records relevant to NHTSA's investigative needs.
Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number, and
Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information)
    Approximately one thousand manufacturers of motor vehicles and
equipment (including tires and child restraint systems) are required to
maintain records. Part 576 requires the manufacturers to retain only
one copy of all records concerning malfunctions that may relate to
motor vehicle safety. The manufacturers are permitted to store this
information by any means they wish and transfer the information from
one means of storage to another as often as they wish. No information
is submitted to the government under this regulation, and NHTSA does
not conduct routine enforcement activities to ensure that the
manufacturers have retained these records.
Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting From the Collection of Information
    To the extent that there is an ``average'' record retention, we
estimate the manufacturers' burden at 40 hours each for a subtotal of
40,000 hours (1,000 respondents x 40 hours). In the case of record
retention by large manufacturers, which often consists of thousands of
pages of records, on average, it would probably take about over 40
hours to properly retain the records. On the other hand, the typical
small business that must retain only a single record should only need
about five (5) minutes to fully comply with the regulation. Some small
manufacturers may not have to retain any records at all. We believe
that 40 hours per manufacturer is a reasonable estimate of the
recordkeeping burden given the difference in the amount of time it
takes for different manufacturers to retain records. We believe that
the modifications to this collection will not increase the burden of
recordkeeping, as manufacturers are only required to keep records
already maintained for a longer time; manufacturers are not required to
retain any new records.
    In addition, there are approximately 23,600 equipment manufacturers
(excluding tires and child seat restraint systems manufacturers) whose
record retention requirements under part 576 are limited to the
documents underlying their part 579 reporting requirements. The
manufacturers' part 579 requirements include only the reporting of
incidents involving deaths. Based on the number of death reports
submitted to date by these equipment manufacturers, we estimate that an
additional 20 equipment manufacturers have record retention
requirements imposed by part 576. We estimate that it will take one
hour each to maintain the necessary records for a subtotal burden of 20
hours (20 respondents x one hour). We are not modifying the records
retention requirements for these manufacturers, so the record keeping
burden will not increase. Accordingly, the estimate of total annual
burden hours is 40,020 hours (1,000 respondents x 40 hours plus 20
respondents x 1 hour) for 49 CFR part 576.
    The agency estimates that the hourly cost associated with the
burden hours of 40,020 is approximately $20 per hour. This is somewhat
higher than the usual assumed hourly cost, reflecting the fact that
although some of these hours would be computer time, a number of the
hours may be clerical time. Accordingly, the agency estimates that the
total annual cost associated with the burden hours is $804,000 (40,020
annual burden hours x $20 per hour).
    Because the proposed revision to this information collection would
not increase the burden hours of the collection, the costs associated
with the burden hours for the collection also are not expected to
increase as result of this proposal.
Comments Are Invited on
     Whether the Department's estimate for the burden of record
retention is accurate.
     Whether there are any costs for electronic storage of
records.
     The volume of records retained pursuant to part 576.
     What the burden of record retention becomes if the
rulemaking requires manufacturers to retain records for a period of
ten, fifteen, twenty, or twenty-five years.
    A comment to OMB is most effective if OMB receives it within 30
days of publication. Send comments to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street
NW, Washington, DC 20503, Attn: NHTSA Desk Officer. PRA comments are
due within 30 days following publication of this document in the
Federal Register.
    The agency recognizes that the collection of information contained
in today's proposed rule may be subject to revision in response to
public comments.

G. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Under the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995
(NTTAA) (Pub. L. 104-113), ``all Federal agencies and departments shall
use technical standards that are developed or adopted by voluntary
consensus standards bodies, using such technical standards as a means
to carry out policy objectives or activities determined by the agencies
and departments.'' The amendment in today's proposed rule would extend
the time manufacturers retain records, and does not involve any
voluntary consensus standards as it relates to NHTSA or this
rulemaking.

H. Executive Order 12988 (Civil Justice Reform)

    With respect to the review of the promulgation of a new regulation,
section 3(b) of Executive Order 12988, ``Civil Justice Reform'' (61 FR
4729, Feb. 7, 1996), requires that Executive agencies make every
reasonable effort to ensure that the regulation: (1) Clearly specifies
the preemptive effect; (2) clearly specifies the effect on existing

Federal law or regulation including all provisions repealed,
circumscribed, displaced, impaired, or modified; (3) provides a clear
legal standard for affected conduct rather than a general standard,
while promoting simplification and burden reduction; (4) clearly
specifies the retroactive effect, if any; (5) specifies whether
administrative proceedings are to be required before parties may file
suit in court; (6) adequately defines key terms; and (7) addresses
other important issues affecting clarity and general draftsmanship
under any guidelines issued by the Attorney General. This document is
consistent with that requirement.
    Pursuant to this Order, NHTSA has considered these issues and
determined that this proposed rule would not have any retroactive or
preemptive effect. The proposed rule would only apply to documents in
manufacturers' possession at the time the rule goes into effect and
documents generated or acquired by manufacturers in the future. NHTSA
notes further that there is no requirement that individuals submit a
petition for reconsideration or pursue other administrative proceeding
before they may file suit in court.

I. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4) requires
agencies to prepare a written assessment of the costs, benefits, and
other effects of proposed or final rules that include a Federal mandate
likely to result in the expenditure by State, local, or tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of more than
$100 million annually (adjusted for inflation with base year of 1995).
This proposed rule would not result in expenditures by State, local, or
tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector in
excess of $100 million annually (adjusted for inflation with base year
of 1995).

J. Executive Order 13211

    Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 18, 2001) applies to any
rulemaking that: (1) Is determined to be economically significant as
defined under Executive Order 12866, and is likely to have a
significantly adverse effect on the supply of, distribution of, or use
of energy; or (2) that is designated by the Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs as a significant energy action.
This rulemaking is not subject to Executive Order 13211.

K. Regulation Identifier Number (RIN)

    The Department of Transportation assigns a regulation identifier
number (RIN) to each regulatory action listed in the Unified Agenda of
Federal Regulations. The Regulatory Information Service Center
publishes the Unified Agenda in April and October of each year. You may
use the RIN contained in the heading at the beginning of this document
to find this action in the Unified Agenda.

L. Public Participation

How do I prepare and submit comments?
    Your comments must be written and in English. To ensure that your
comments are correctly filed in the Docket, please include the docket
number of this document in your comments. Your comments must not be
more than 15 pages long.\14\ We established this limit to encourage you
to write your primary comments in a concise fashion. However, you may
attach necessary additional documents to your comments. There is no
limit on the length of the attachments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See 49 CFR 553.21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Please submit your comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on
the electronic docket site by clicking on ``Help'' or ``FAQ.''
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Rm. W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    If you are submitting comments electronically as a PDF (Adobe)
file, we ask that the documents submitted be scanned using Optical
Character Recognition (OCR) process, thus allowing the agency to search
and copy certain portions of your submissions.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ Optical character recognition (OCR) is the process of
converting an image of text, such as a scanned paper document or
electronic fax file, into computer-editable text.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Please note that pursuant to the Data Quality Act, in order for
substantive data to be relied upon and used by the agency, it must meet
the information quality standards set forth in the OMB and DOT Data
Quality Act guidelines. Accordingly, we encourage you to consult the
guidelines in preparing your comments. OMB's guidelines may be accessed
at https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/fedreg_reproducible. DOT's guidelines
may be accessed at https://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/subject_areas/statistical_policy_and_research/data_quality_guidelines/html/guidelines.html.
How can I be sure that my comments were received?
    If you submit your comments by mail and wish Docket Management to
notify you upon its receipt of your comments, enclose a self-addressed,
stamped postcard in the envelope containing your comments. Upon
receiving your comments, Docket Management will return the postcard by
mail.
How do I submit confidential business information?
    If you wish to submit any information under a claim of
confidentiality, you should submit three copies of your complete
submission, including the information you claim to be confidential
business information, to the Chief Counsel, NHTSA, at the address given
above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. When you send a comment
containing information claimed to be confidential business information,
you should include a cover letter setting forth the information
specified in our confidential business information regulation.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See 49 CFR part 512.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, you should submit a copy, from which you have deleted
the claimed confidential business information, to the Docket by one of
the methods set forth above.
Will the agency consider late comments?
    We will consider all comments received before the close of business
on the comment closing date indicated above under DATES. To the extent
possible, we will also consider comments received after that date.
Therefore, if interested persons believe that any new information the
Agency places in the docket affects their comments, they may submit
comments after the closing date concerning how the agency should
consider that information for the final rule. If a comment is received
too late for us to consider in developing a final rule (assuming that
one is issued), we will consider that comment as an informal suggestion
for future rulemaking action.

How can I read the comments submitted by other people?
    You may read the materials placed in the docket for this document
(e.g., the comments submitted in response to this document by other
interested persons) at any time by going to http://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for accessing the dockets. You may also
read the materials at the Docket Management Facility by going to the
street address given above under ADDRESSES. The Docket Management
Facility is open between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. Eastern Time, Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.

M. Privacy Act Statement

    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).

List of Subjects in 49 CFR Part 576

    Motor vehicle safety, Tires, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, NHTSA proposes to amend
49 CFR part 576 as follows:

PART 576--RECORD RETENTION

0
1. Amend Sec.  576.5 by revising paragraph (a) to read as follows:

Sec.  576.5   Basic requirements.

    (a) Each manufacturer of motor vehicles, child restraint systems,
and tires shall retain, as specified in Sec.  576.7 of this part, all
records described in Sec.  576.6 of this part for a period of ten
calendar years from the date on which they were generated or acquired
by the manufacturer.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, under authority delegated in 49 CFR
1.95 and 501.5.
Heidi Renate King,
Deputy Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2019-09844 Filed 5-14-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 180 (Monday, September 17, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46933-46934]
[FR Doc No: 2018-20102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR18-37-000]

Medallion Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Petition for
Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on September 10, 2018, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2)
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2018), Medallion Pipeline
Company, LLC., filed a petition for

Declaratory Order seeking approval of the overall tariff rate structure
and terms and conditions of service, including the proposed priority
service prorationing methodology for an expansion of major segments of
Medallion Pipeline Company, LLC.'s crude oil pipeline system, all as
more fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at  http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the
website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any
FERC Online service, please email [email protected], or call
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on October 10, 2018.

    Dated: September 11, 2018.
 Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-20102 Filed 9-14-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 230 (Monday, November 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 76630]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26413]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of
the Government in the Sunshine Act, Public Law 94-409, that the
Securities and Exchange Commission Asset Management Advisory Committee
(``AMAC'') will hold a public meeting on Tuesday, December 1, 2020 at
9:00 a.m.

PLACE: The meeting will be conducted by remote means. Members of the
public may watch the webcast of the meeting on the Commission's website
at www.sec.gov.

STATUS: The meeting will begin at 9:00 a.m. and will be open to the
public by webcast on the Commission's website at www.sec.gov.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: On November 9, 2020, the Commission issued
notice of the meeting (Release No. 34-90376), indicating that the
meeting is open to the public and inviting the public to submit written
comments to AMAC. This Sunshine Act notice is being issued because a
majority of the Commission may attend the meeting.
    The meeting will include a discussion of matters in the asset
management industry relating to (1) the Private Investments
Subcommittee; (2) the ESG Subcommittee, including a discussion of
potential recommendations from that Subcommittee; and (3) the Diversity
and Inclusion Subcommittee, including a panel discussion on improving
diversity and inclusion.
    The meeting will also include a discussion of AMAC's administrative
matters during a portion of the meeting that will not be open to the
public.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information, please
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202)
551-5400.

    Dated: November 24, 2020.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-26413 Filed 11-25-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 80 (Thursday, April 27, 2017)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19321-19322]
[FR Doc No: 2017-08504]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[Docket No. USCG-2017-0291]

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Reynolds Channel, Long Beach, NY

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the
operating schedule that governs the Long Beach Bridge across Reynolds
Channel, mile 4.7, at Long Beach, New York. This deviation is necessary
in order to facilitate an annual fireworks display and allows the
bridge to remain in the closed position for one hour.

DATES: This deviation is effective from 9:30 p.m. on July 7, 2017 to
10:30 p.m. on July 9, 2017.

ADDRESSES: The docket for this deviation, USCG-2017-0291 is available
at http://www.regulations.gov. Type the docket number in the ``SEARCH''
box and click ``SEARCH''. Click on Open Docket Folder on the line
associated with this deviation.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary deviation, call or email James M. Moore, Bridge Management
Specialist, First District Bridge Branch, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone
212-514-4334, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The City of Long Beach Police Department
requested and the bridge owner, Nassau County of Public Works,
concurred with a temporary deviation request from the

normal operating schedule to facilitate a public fireworks event.
    The Long Beach Bridge, mile 4.7, across Reynolds Channel, has a
vertical clearance of 22 feet at mean high water and 24 feet at mean
low water in the closed position. The existing drawbridge operating
regulations are listed at 33 CFR 117.799(g).
    This temporary deviation will allow the Long Beach Bridge to remain
closed from 9:30 p.m. through 10:30 p.m. on July 7, 2017 with rain
dates of July 8, 2017 and July 9, 2017. The waterway is used primarily
by seasonal recreational vessels and occasional tug/barge traffic.
Coordination with waterway users has indicated no objections to this
short-term closure of the draw.
    Vessels that can pass under the bridge without an opening may do so
at all times. The bridge will be able to open for emergencies. There is
no alternate route for vessels to pass.
    The Coast Guard will also inform the users of the waterways through
our Local and Broadcast Notices to Mariners of the change in operating
schedule for the bridge so that vessel operators can arrange their
transits to minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.
    In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to
its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective
period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating
regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

    Dated: April 24, 2017.
C.J. Bisignano,
Supervisory Bridge Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2017-08504 Filed 4-26-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 18 (Tuesday, January 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4962-4963]
[FR Doc No: 2020-01415]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR20-6-000]

Medallion Pipeline Company, LLC; Notice of Petition for
Declaratory Order

    Take notice that on January 14, 2020, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2019), Medallion Pipeline
Company, LLC (Medallion or Petitioner) filed a petition for a
declaratory order seeking approval of the open season procedures,
transportation services agreement

provisions, overall rate structure, and terms of service offered by
Medallion for committed firm service on a proposed expansion of the
Medallion pipeline system, all as more fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the website that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on February 14, 2020.

    Dated: January 22, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-01415 Filed 1-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 71 (Friday, April 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 21925]
[FR Doc No: 2013-08636]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings in Existing Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP12-1013-003.
    Applicants: Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C.
    Description: Revised Compliance in Docket No. RP12-1013 to be
effective 5/15/2013.
    Filed Date: 4/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20130403-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/13.

    Docket Numbers: RP13-762-001.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company.
    Description: Negotiated Rates--Momentum--Liberty GA--AMENDMENT to
be effective 4/1/2013.
    Filed Date: 4/3/13.
    Accession Number: 20130403-5117.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 4/15/13.

    Any person desiring to protest in any the above proceedings must
file in accordance with Rule 211 of the Commission's Regulations (18
CFR 385.211) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the specified
comment date.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, and service can be found at:
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other
information, call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-
8659.

    Dated April 4, 2013.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-08636 Filed 4-11-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Karl Brooks,
Karl Brooks, Regional Administrator, Region 7.
[FR Doc. 2012-4684 Filed 2-27-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: August 17, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 157)]
[Notices]
[Page 41478-41479]
[DOCID:fr17au09-125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-60469; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2009-73]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Rule
6.76A--Order Execution-OX and Proposing New Rule 6.88--Directed Orders

August 10, 2009.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on August 5, 2009, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is proposing (i) new Rule 6.88 to describe Directed
Orders, (ii) to amend Rule 6.76A to describe how Directed Orders are
allocated upon execution, (iii) define Directed Order Market Makers,
Order Flow Providers, and Directed Orders, and (iv) make other
amendments to provide for Directed Orders. The text of the proposed
rule change is attached as Exhibit 5 to the 19b-4 form. A copy of this
filing is available on the Exchange's Web site at http://www.nyse.com,
at the Exchange's principal office and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    NYSE Arca proposes new Rule 6.88, Directed Orders, under which
Market Makers may receive Directed Orders, and also proposes to amend
Rule 6.76A to describe the allocation of Directed Orders upon
execution. Additionally, the Exchange proposes to define Directed
Orders, Order Flow Provider, and Directed Order Market Maker
(``DOMM''), and make other rule modifications to provide for Directed
Orders.
    Proposed Rule 6.88, Directed Orders, is based on NYSE Amex Rule
964.1NY. It permits any Market Maker to receive Directed Orders,
provided the Market Maker is quoting at the National Best Bid/Offer
(``NBBO'') at the time of receipt. It also describes how Directed
Orders are to be executed if the DOMM is not at the NBBO at time of
receipt. Additionally, the proposed Rule requires a DOMM to meet a 90%
quoting obligation in any class in which a Directed Order is received.
The Exchange believes it is appropriate to oblige DOMMs to a higher
quoting standard in return for the privilege of receiving directed
order flow.
    The Exchange is also proposing to amend Rule 6.76A the
circumstances by which a DOMM may receive an allocation entitlement up
to 40% of an incoming order if quoting at the NBBO at the time the NYSE
Arca System

receives a Directed Order. A DOMM will receive up to 40% of the
remaining balance of an order, or the DOMM's share in the order of
ranking, whichever is greater, provided that any Customer orders ranked
ahead of the DOMM are satisfied first. However, if the DOMM is not at
the NBBO, the order will be allocated as if it were not a Directed
Order.
    The Exchange is proposing new Rule 6.62(z) to define Directed
Orders, and also new Rule 6.1A(a)(20) to define Directed Order Market
Maker and 6.1A(a)(21) to define Order Flow Provider.
    Lastly, the Exchange is proposing to modify Rule 6.82(d)(2)--
Guaranteed Participation, to clarify that LMMs are entitled to a trade
allocation in accordance with Rule 6.76A, and that LMMs are not
entitled to any guaranteed allocation on Directed Orders that trade
with a Directed Order Market Maker. If the DOMM is not quoting at the
NBBO, but the LMM's quote is at the NBBO, the LMM will be entitled to a
trade allocation in accordance with Rule 6.76A. The LLM will be
entitled to the same allocation as currently applicable under Rule
6.76A.
    The trade allocation described in Rule 6.76A is structured so that
no order will be subject to a guaranteed allocation greater than 40% of
its size after satisfying any Customer orders ranked ahead of any
guaranteed recipient. Additionally, it would be considered a violation
of just and equitable principals of trade and a misuse of non-public
information for a Directed Order Market Maker to become aware of an
impending Directed Order so as to improve the quote to momentarily
match the NBBO, and then worsen the price of the quote following
execution of the Directed Order.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act \4\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act, in that it is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest, as it will
provide greater incentive for Directed Order Market Makers to quote at
the NBBO, and thereby provide a more competitive market structure for
investors in general.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change: (i) Does not
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) does not impose any significant burden on competition;
and (iii) by its terms, does not become operative for 30 days from the
date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may
designate, if consistent with the protection of investors and the
public interest, it has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \5\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has complied with this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://
www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2009-73 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2009-73. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room on official
business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2009-73 and should be submitted on or before
September 8, 2009.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-19575 Filed 8-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49690-49691]
[FR Doc No: 2017-23264]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81914; File No. SR-NYSE-2017-32]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Section 202.06 of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual To Prohibit Listed Companies From Issuing Material News After
the Official Closing Time for the Exchange's Trading Session Until the
Earlier of Publication of Such Company's Official Closing Price on the
Exchange or Five Minutes After the Official Closing Time

October 20, 2017.
    On August 17, 2017, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the
``Manual'') to prohibit listed companies from issuing material news
after the official closing time for the Exchange's trading session
until the earlier of publication of such company's official closing
price on the Exchange or five minutes after the official closing time.
The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal
Register on September 5, 2017.\3\ The Commission received one comment
letter on the proposed rule change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 81494 (August 29,
2017), 82 FR 42008.
    \4\ See letter to Eduardo A. Aleman, Assistant Secretary,
Commission from John Dibacco Virtu Financial LLC, dated September
20, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the

proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day for this filing is October 20, 2017.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending the 45-day time period for Commission
action on the proposed rule change. The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on
the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
Exchange's proposal, as described above. Accordingly, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\6\ the Commission designates December 4,
2017, as the date by which the Commission shall either approve or
disapprove or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove
the proposed rule change (File No. SR-NYSE-2017-32).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-23264 Filed 10-25-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 55 (Thursday, March 21, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 10557]
[FR Doc No: 2019-05338]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 6a-3, SEC File No. 270-0015, OMB Control No. 3235-0021

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 6a-3 (17 CFR 240.6a-3)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.)
(``Act''). The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of
information to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for
extension and approval.
    Section 6 of the Act sets out a framework for the registration and
regulation of national securities exchanges. Under Rule 6a-3, one of
the rules that implements Section 6, a national securities exchange (or
an exchange exempted from registration as a national securities
exchange based on limited trading volume) must provide certain
supplemental information to the Commission, including any material
(including notices, circulars, bulletins, lists, and periodicals)
issued or made generally available to members of, or participants or
subscribers to, the exchange. Rule 6a-3 also requires the exchanges to
file monthly reports that set forth the volume and aggregate dollar
amount of certain securities sold on the exchange each month.
    The information required to be filed with the Commission pursuant
to Rule 6a-3 is designed to enable the Commission to carry out its
statutorily mandated oversight functions and to ensure that registered
and exempt exchanges continue to be in compliance with the Act.
    The Commission estimates that each respondent makes approximately
12 such filings on an annual basis. Each response takes approximately
0.5 hours. In addition, respondents incur shipping costs of
approximately $20 per submission. Currently, 21 respondents (21
national securities exchanges) are subject to the collection of
information requirements of Rule 6a-3. The Commission estimates that
the total burden for all respondents is 126 hours and $5,040 per year.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: Charles Riddle, Acting
Director/Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission,
c/o Candace Kenner, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an
email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
     Dated: March 15, 2019.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-05338 Filed 3-20-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: August 2, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 147)]
[Notices]
[Page 45110]
[DOCID:fr02au10-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. PR10-62-000]

Pelico Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Filing

July 26, 2010.
    Take notice that on July 15, 2010, Pelico Pipeline, LLC (Pelico)
filed a revised Statement of Operating conditions to modify several gas
quality specifications to be consistent with the downstream pipeline
specifications. In addition, the imbalance cash out section has been
revised to modify the pipeline indices used for the cash out to be
aligned with recent market conditions and pipeline activity and the
pressure base has been updated to current practice.
    Any person desiring to participate in this rate filing must file in
accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be considered
by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to be taken,
but will not serve to make protestants parties to the proceeding. Any
person wishing to become a party must file a notice of intervention or
motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests
must be filed on or before the date as indicated below. Anyone filing
an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on or before the
intervention or protest date need not serve motions to intervene or
protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on Monday, August 9, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-18847 Filed 7-30-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P