[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 56 (Thursday, March 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16836-16837]
[FR Doc No: 2012-6936]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9650-6]

Clean Air Act Operating Permit Program; Petition for Objection to
State Operating Permit for Public Service Company of New Mexico, San
Juan Generating Station

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of final action.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces that the EPA Administrator has
responded to a citizen petition asking EPA to object to an operating
permit (Permit Number P062R2) issued by the New Mexico Environment
Department, Air Quality Bureau (NMED). Specifically, the Administrator
has granted in part and denied in part the November 19, 2010 petition,
submitted by WildEarth Guardians, the San Juan Citizens Alliance, and
Carson Forest Watch (Petitioners) to object to the operating permit
issued on January 24, 2011 to the Public Service Company of New Mexico,
for the operations of the San Juan Generating Station (SJGS) located in
San Juan County, New Mexico. Pursuant to sections 307(b) and 505(b)(2)
of the Clean Air Act (CAA), a petition for judicial review of those
parts of the Order that deny issues in the petition may be filed in the
United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit within 60
days from the date this notice appears in the Federal Register.

ADDRESSES: You may review copies of the final Order, the petition, and
other supporting information at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733.
    EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the individual
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFROMATION CONTACT section to view copies of
the final Order, petition, and other supporting information. You may
view the hard copies Monday through Friday, from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays. If you wish to examine these documents, you
should make an appointment at least 24 hours before the visiting day.
Additionally, the final Order for the Public Service Company of New
Mexico San Juan Generating Station is available electronically at:
http://www.epa.gov/region07/air/title5/petitiondb/petitions/san_juan_response2010.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brad Toups at<PHONE_NUMBER>, email
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or the above EPA, Region 6 address.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The CAA affords EPA a 45-day period to
review, and object to as appropriate, a Title V operating permit
proposed by State permitting authorities. Section 505(b)(2) of the Act
authorizes any person to petition the EPA Administrator, within 60 days
after the expiration of this review period, to object to a Title V
operating permit if EPA has not done so. Petitions must be based only
on objections to the permit that were raised with reasonable
specificity during the public comment period provided by the State,
unless the petitioner demonstrates that it was impracticable to raise
these

issues during the comment period or the grounds for the issue arose
after this period.
    EPA received a petition from the Petitioners dated November 19,
2010, requesting that EPA object to the issuance of the Title V
operating permit to Public Service Company of New Mexico, for the
operation of the San Juan Generating Station in San Juan County, New
Mexico for the following reasons: (1) Fails to ensure compliance with
the Prevention of Significant Deterioration requirements; (2) fails to
ensure compliance with source impact analysis requirements in the New
Mexico State Implementation Plan; (3) fails to require prompt reporting
of deviations; (4) fails to require sufficient periodic monitoring; and
(5) includes a condition that is contrary to applicable requirements.
    On February 15, 2012, the Administrator issued an order granting in
part and denying in part the petition. The order explains the reasons
behind EPA's conclusion to grant in part and deny in part the petition.

    Dated: March 14, 2012.
Al Armendariz,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. 2012-6936 Filed 3-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: July 15, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 134)]
[Notices]
[Page 34323]
[DOCID:fr15jy09-74]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13477-000]

FFP Project 67, LLC; Notice of Preliminary Permit Application
Accepted for Filing and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Competing Applications

July 8, 2009.
    On May 22, 2009, FFP Project 67, LLC filed an application for a
preliminary permit, pursuant to section 4(f) of the Federal Power Act,
proposing to study the feasibility of the Bondurant Chute Hydrokinetic
Project, to be located on the Mississippi River, in Tensas Parish,
Louisiana and Claiborne County, Mississippi.
    The sole purpose of a preliminary permit, if issued, is to grant
the permit holder priority to file a license application during the
permit term. A preliminary permit does not authorize the permit holder
to perform any land disturbing activities or otherwise enter upon lands
or waters owned by others without the owners' express permission.
    The proposed Bondurant Chute Hydrokinetic Project consists of: (1)
3,802 proposed 40 kilowatt Free Flow generating units having a total
installed capacity of 152.08 megawatts; (2) a 5-mile-long, 69 kilovolt
transmission line; and (3) appurtenant facilities. The proposed
Bondurant Chute Hydrokinetic Project would have an average annual
generation of 666 gigawatt-hours.
    Applicant Contact: Ramya Swaminathan, Vice President of
Development, Free Flow Power Corporation, 33 Commercial Street,
Gloucester, MA 01930; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    FERC Contact: Kim Carter,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, competing
applications (without notices of intent), or notices of intent to file
competing applications: 60 days from the issuance of this notice.
Comments, motions to intervene, notices of intent, and competing
applications may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. If unable to be filed electronically,
documents may be paper-filed. To paper-file, an original and eight
copies should be mailed to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426. For
more information on how to submit these types of filings please go to
the Commission's Web site located at http://www.ferc.gov/filing-
comments.asp.. More information about this project, including a copy of
the application, can be viewed or printed on the ``eLibrary'' link of
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
Enter the docket number (P-13477) in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, call toll-free 1-866-208-3372.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-16723 Filed 7-14-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: June 29, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 124)]
[Notices]
[Page 37421-37422]
[DOCID:fr29jn10-52]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 12574-002]

Santiam Water Control District; Notice of Application Ready for
Environmental Analysis, and Soliciting Comments, Terms Conditions, and
Recommendations

June 22, 2010.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection.
    a. Type of Application: Exemption from Licensing.
    b. Project No.: 12574-002.
    c. Date filed: June 18, 2007 and supplemented on July 18, 2007,
pursuant to Order Denying Rehearing (119 FERC ] 61,159).
    d. Applicant: Santiam Water Control District.
    e. Name of Project: Stayton Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: On the Stayton Ditch near the Town of Stayton, Marion
County, Oregon. The project would not occupy United States land.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of
1978, 16 U.S.C. 2705 and 2708.
    h. Applicant Contact: Brent Stevenson, Santiam Water Control
District, 284 East Water Street, Stayton OR 97383,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Joseph Hassell,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    j. Deadline for filing comments, recommendations, terms and
conditions: 60 days from the issuance date of this notice; reply
comments are due 105 days from the issuance date of this notice.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice require all intervenors filing
documents with the Commission to serve a copy of that document on each
person whose name appears on the official service list for the project.
Further, if an intervenor files comments or documents with the
Commission relating to the merits of an issue that may affect the
responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they must also serve
a copy of the document on that resource agency.
    Comments, recommendations, terms and conditions may be filed
electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. The Commission
strongly encourages electronic filings. See 18

CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web
site (http://www.ferc.gov) under the ``eFiling'' link.
    k. This application has been accepted and is now ready for
environmental analysis at this time.
    l. Description of Project: The Stayton Hydropower Project would
consist of the existing: (1) Power canal headgate structure and fish
ladder, fish screen, and 28-inch-diameter, 600-foot-long juvenile fish
bypassed return pipe located near the upstream end of Stayton Ditch;
(2) the 0.5-mile-long Stayton Ditch; (3) 24-foot-long by 12-foot-high
intake structure equipped with 24.6-foot-long by 12-foot-high and 3-
inch bar spacing trashracks located just upstream of the powerhouse;
(4) the 40-foot-long V-type spillway weir and integral powerhouse
containing a single 600-kilowatt generating unit; (5) the 24-foot-long
by 12-foot-high outlet structure located just downstream of the
powerhouse; (6) the 0.5-mile-long tailrace channel and tailrace fish
barrier; (7) the100-foot-long, 2,400-kilovolt transmission line; and
(8) appurtenant facilities. The project would have an average annual
generation of 4,320 megawatt-hours.
    m. A copy of the application is available for review at the
Commission in the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the
Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary''
link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three digits in the
docket number field to access the document. For assistance, contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-
866-208-3676, or for TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is also available for
inspection and reproduction at the address in item h. above.
    All filings must: (1) Bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS'', ``REPLY COMMENTS'', ``RECOMMENDATIONS,'' or ``TERMS AND
CONDITIONS,'' (2) set forth in the heading the name of the applicant
and the project number of the application to which the filing responds;
(3) furnish the name, address, and telephone number of the person
submitting the filing; and (4) otherwise comply with the requirements
of 18 CFR 385.2001 through 385.2005. All comments, recommendations,
terms and conditions must set forth their evidentiary basis and
otherwise comply with the requirements of 18 CFR 4.34(b). Agencies may
obtain copies of the application directly from the applicant. Each
filing must be accompanied by proof of service on all persons listed on
the service list prepared by the Commission in this proceeding, in
accordance with 18 CFR 4.34(b), and 385.2010.
    You may also register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/
esubscription.asp to be notified via e-mail of new filings and
issuances related to this or other pending projects. For assistance,
contact FERC Online Support.
    n. Procedural schedule: The Commission staff proposes to issue a
single Environmental Assessment (EA) rather than issuing a draft and
final EA. Staff intends to allow 30 days for entities to comment on the
EA, and will take into consideration all comments received on the EA
before final action is taken on the exemption application. The
application will be processed according to the schedule, but revisions
to the schedule may be made as appropriate:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Milestone                           Target date
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of Acceptance and Ready for     June 18, 2010.
 Environmental Analysis.
Filing comments, recommendations,      August 17, 2010.
 terms and conditions.
Reply comments.......................  October 1, 2010.
Notice of availability of Final EA...  December 1, 2010.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-15697 Filed 6-28-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: September 4, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 171)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 45781-45783]
[DOCID:fr04se09-17]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2009-0782; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-011-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -
223, -243, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343
Series Airplanes; and Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, and -313
Series Airplanes; and A340-541 and -642 Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:

    During a scheduled maintenance inspection on the MLG [main
landing gear], the bogie stop pad was found deformed and cracked.
Upon removal of the bogie stop pad for replacement, the bogie beam
was also found cracked.
* * * * *
    A second bogie beam crack has subsequently been found on another
aircraft, located under a bogie stop pad which only had superficial
paint damage.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could result in
the aircraft departing the runway or to the bogie detaching from the
aircraft or gear collapses, which would all constitute unsafe
conditions at speeds above 30 knots.
* * * * *

The proposed AD would require actions that are intended to address the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by October 5, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-40, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     For service information identified in this proposed AD,
contact Airbus SAS--Airworthiness Office--EAL, 1 Rond Point Maurice
Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex, France; fax +33 5 61 93 45 80; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.airbus.com. You
may review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-1138; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0782;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-011-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://
www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued EASA
Airworthiness Directive 2008-0223, dated December 15, 2008 (referred to
after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The MCAI states:

    During a scheduled maintenance inspection on the MLG [main
landing gear], the bogie stop pad was found deformed and cracked.
Upon removal of the bogie stop pad for replacement, the bogie beam
was also found cracked.
    Laboratory investigation indicates that an overload event has
occurred and no fatigue propagation of the crack was evident. An
investigation is still underway to establish the root cause of this
overload.
    A second bogie beam crack has subsequently been found on another
aircraft, located under a bogie stop pad which only had superficial
paint damage.
    This condition, if not detected and corrected, could result in
the aircraft departing the runway or to the bogie detaching from the
aircraft or gear collapses, which would all constitute unsafe
conditions at speeds above 30 knots.
    As a precautionary measure, this AD requires detailed
inspections under the bogie stop pad of both MLG bogie beams and, in
case deformation or damage is detected, to apply the associated
repair.

The one-time inspections consist of the following:
     Inspection for corrosion and damage to the paint and
cadmium plate of the sliding piston subassembly.
     Inspection for cracking and deformation of the top and
bottom

surfaces and bolt holes of the bogie stop pad subassembly and bracket.
     Inspection for cracking, corrosion, and damage to
protective treatments, and deformation of the bogie beam surface of the
bogie beam subassembly where the bogie stop pad subassembly has been
removed, and a magnetic particle non-destructive test inspection of the
bogie beam assembly where the bogie stop pad subassembly has been
removed.
    Corrective actions include repairing protective treatments,
removing corrosion, and replacing the bogie stop pad if necessary. For
airplanes on which a crack or deformation in the bogie beam is found,
corrective actions include contacting Messier-Dowty Limited and/or
Airbus for instructions for repair, and repairing before further
flight.
    You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.

Relevant Service Information

    Airbus has issued the service bulletins identified in the following
table:

                                           Table--Service Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Use Airbus Mandatory
           For model--              Service Bulletin--                           Dated--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -243,  A330-32-3220........  October 10, 2008.
 -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -
 323, -341, -342, -343 series
 airplanes.
A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312,  A340-32-4264........  October 10, 2008.
 -313 series airplanes.
A340-541, -642 airplanes.........  A340-32-5087........  October 10, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The actions described in this service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe condition
exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of the same
type design.

Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information

    We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
    We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a note within the proposed AD.

Costs of Compliance

    Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 52 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 2 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed
AD on U.S. operators to be $8,320, or $160 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

    1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

    2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Airbus: Docket No. FAA-2009-0782; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-
011-AD.

Comments Due Date

    (a) We must receive comments by October 5, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) None.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Airbus Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223,
-243, -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343
series airplanes; and Model A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312, -313
series airplanes; and

A340-541 and -642 airplanes; all serial numbers; certificated in any
category.

Subject

    (d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32: Landing
gear.

Reason

    (e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
    ``During a scheduled maintenance inspection on the MLG [main
landing gear], the bogie stop pad was found deformed and cracked.
Upon removal of the bogie stop pad for replacement, the bogie beam
was also found cracked.
    ``Laboratory investigation indicates that an overload event has
occurred and no fatigue propagation of the crack was evident. An
investigation is still underway to establish the root cause of this
overload.
    ``A second bogie beam crack has subsequently been found on
another aircraft, located under a bogie stop pad which only had
superficial paint damage.
    ``This condition, if not detected and corrected, could result in
the aircraft departing the runway or to the bogie detaching from the
aircraft or gear collapses, which would all constitute unsafe
conditions at speeds above 30 knots.
    ``As a precautionary measure, this AD requires detailed
inspections under the bogie stop pad of both MLG bogie beams and, in
case deformation or damage is detected, to apply the associated
repair.''

Actions and Compliance

    (f) Unless already done, do the following actions.
    (1) At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph
(f)(1)(i), (f)(1)(ii), (f)(1)(iii), (f)(1)(iv), (f)(1)(v), or
(f)(1)(vi) of this AD, perform one-time detailed inspections of both
main landing gear bogie beams in the region of the bogie stop pad
for detection of deformation and damage, and apply the applicable
corrective actions, in accordance with instructions defined in the
Airbus mandatory service bulletins listed in Table 1 of this AD, as
applicable. Do all applicable corrective actions before further
flight.
    (i) Airplanes with 22 months or less and 2,500 flight cycles or
less from the first flight with the original bogie beam as of the
effective date of this AD: Not earlier than 2,500 flight cycles or
22 months on the original bogie beam, whichever occurs first, but
not later than 40 months from first flight.
    (ii) Airplanes with 22 months or less and 2,500 flight cycles or
less on a new bogie beam installed in service as of the effective
date of this AD: Not earlier than 2,500 flight cycles or 22 months
on the new bogie beam, whichever occurs first, but no later than 40
months from the installation of a new bogie beam in service.
    (iii) Airplanes with 22 months or less and 2,500 flight cycles
or less on an overhauled bogie beam as of the effective date of this
AD: Not earlier than 2,500 flight cycles or 22 months on the
overhauled bogie beam, whichever occurs first, but no later than 40
months from the last overhaul.
    (iv) Airplanes with more than 22 months or more than 2,500
flight cycles from the first flight with the original bogie beam, as
of the effective date of this AD: Within 18 months after the
effective date of this AD.
    (v) Airplanes with more than 22 months or more than 2,500 flight
cycles on a new bogie beam installed in service, as of the effective
date of this AD: Within 18 months after the effective date of this
AD.
    (vi) Airplanes with more than 22 months or more than 2,500
flight cycles on an overhauled bogie beam, as of the effective date
of this AD: Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD.

                                           Table 1--Service Bulletins
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                   Use Airbus Mandatory
           For model--              Service Bulletin--                           Dated--

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A330-201, -202, -203, -223, -243,  A330-32-3220........  October 10, 2008.
 -301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -
 323, -341, -342, -343 series
 airplanes.
A340-211, -212, -213, -311, -312,  A340-32-4264........  October 10, 2008.
 -313 series airplanes.
A340-541, -642 airplanes.........  A340-32-5087........  October 10, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) Report the results, including no findings of the inspection
required by paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, to Airbus, Customer
Services Directorate,
    1 Rond Point Maurice Bellonte, 31707 Blagnac Cedex France; Attn:
SEDCC1 Technical Data and Documentation Services; Fax (+33) 5 61 93
28 06; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>at the applicable time
specified in paragraph (f)(2)(i) or (f)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) If the inspection is done on or after the effective date of
this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the inspection.
    (ii) If the inspection was accomplished prior to the effective
date of this AD: Submit the report within 30 days after the
effective date of this AD.

FAA AD Differences

    Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows: No differences.

Other FAA AD Provisions

    (g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-1138; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
    (3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.

Related Information

    (h) Refer to MCAI EASA Airworthiness Directive 2008-0223, dated
December 15, 2008, and the Airbus mandatory service bulletins listed
in Table 1 of this AD, for related information.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on August 26, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-21317 Filed 9-3-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 28 (Thursday, February 10, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7850]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02865]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Docket ID FEMA-2022-0002; Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-B-2129]

Proposed Flood Hazard Determinations for Larimer County, Colorado
and Incorporated Areas

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland
Security.

ACTION: Notice; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is withdrawing
its proposed notice concerning proposed flood hazard determinations,
which may include the addition or modification of any Base Flood
Elevation, base flood depth, Special Flood Hazard Area boundary or zone
designation, or regulatory floodway (herein after referred to as
proposed flood hazard determinations) on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps
and, where applicable, in the supporting Flood Insurance Study reports
for Larimer County, Colorado and Incorporated Areas.

DATES: This withdrawal is effective February 10, 2022.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. FEMA-B-
2129, to Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering Services Branch, Federal
Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA, 400 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected].

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rick Sacbibit, Chief, Engineering
Services Branch, Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, FEMA,
400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or (email)
[email protected];

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On May 7, 2021, FEMA published a proposed
notice at 86 FR 24641, proposing flood hazard determinations for
Larimer County, Colorado and Incorporated Areas. FEMA is withdrawing
the proposed notice.
    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4104; 44 CFR 67.4.

Michael M. Grimm,
Assistant Administrator for Risk Management, Department of Homeland
Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2022-02865 Filed 2-9-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-12-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 10 (Wednesday, January 15, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 2746-2747]
[FR Doc No: 2014-00617]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Twenty Fourth Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced
Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS)

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting notice of RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced Flight
Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the
twenty fourth meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 213, Enhanced
Flight Vision Systems/Synthetic Vision Systems (EFVS/SVS).

DATES: The meeting will be held February 4-6, 2013 from 9:00 a.m.-5:00
p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at Hilton Pensacola Beach Gulf
Front, 12 Via de Luna Drive, Pensacola Beach, FL 32561, Coral Reef
Conference Room.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Etherington,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(319) 295-5233, Patrick Krohn,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(425) 602-1375 and The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th
Street NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC 20036, or by telephone at (202)
330-0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org. Additional contact information: please contact Patrick
Krohn<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or mobile at (425)
829-1996. RTCA contact is Jennifer Iverson<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(202)
330-0662.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 213. The agenda will
include the following:

Tuesday, February 4

Plenary Discussion (sign in at 9:00 a.m.)

 Introductions and administrative items
 Review and approve minutes from last full plenary meeting
 Review of terms of reference
 Status of DO-342A and DO-315C Drafts
 Industry updates
 DO-315C and DO-342A draft review

Wednesday, February 5

Plenary Discussion

 WG-1 DO-315C draft review
 WG-2 DO-342A draft review

Thursday, February 6

Plenary Discussion

 WG-1 DO-315C draft review
 WG-1 DO-342A draft review
 Administrative items
 Adjourn

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public
may present oral statements at the meeting.
    Persons wishing to present statements or obtain information should
contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. Members of the public may present a written statement to the
committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 9, 2014.
Paige Williams,
Management Analyst, NextGen, Business Operations Groupm Federal
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2014-00617 Filed 1-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 82 (Tuesday, April 29, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 24032]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09674]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-72000; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2014-20]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 2, To List and Trade Shares of
Reality Shares Isolated Dividend Growth ETF Under NYSE Arca Equities
Rule 8.600

April 23, 2014.
    On February 25, 2014, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to list and trade
shares of Reality Shares Isolated Dividend Growth ETF under NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.600. On March 7, 2014, the Exchange filed Amendment No.
2 to the proposed rule change, which amended and replaced the proposed
rule change in its entirety.\3\ The proposed rule change, as modified
by Amendment No. 2, was published for comment in the Federal Register
on March 17, 2014.\4\ The Commission received no comments on this
proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ Amendment No. 1 was filed on March 6, 2014 and withdrawn on
March 7, 2014.
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71686 (March 11,
2014), 79 FR 14761.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day for this filing is May 1, 2014. The Commission is extending
this 45-day time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider this proposed rule change, which would
allow the listing of a new exchange-traded product.
    Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\6\ designates June 13, 2014 as the date by which the Commission
should either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change, as modified
by Amendment No. 2 (File No. SR-NYSEArca-2014-20).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-09674 Filed 4-28-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P