[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52901-52902]
[FR Doc No: 2017-24723]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

FRL-9970-67-OGC; EPA-HQ-OGC-2017-0630]

Proposed Settlement Agreement, Clean Air Act Title V Permit
Appeal

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Proposed Settlement Agreement; Request for Public
Comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as
amended (``CAA'' or the ``Act''), notice is hereby given of a proposed
settlement agreement to resolve a case filed by Veolia ES Technical
Solutions, L.L.C. (``Veolia'') involving EPA actions under the CAA
Title V operating permit program. On February, 15, 2017, Veolia filed a
petition with the Environmental Appeals Board (``EAB'') challenging the
CAA Title V renewal permit issued by EPA Region 5 for the Veolia
facility in Sauget, Illinois (``the Facility'') on January 18, 2017.
(In re Veolia ES Technical Solutions, L.L.C., CAA Appeal No. 17-02).
Under the proposed settlement agreement, among other changes to the
permit, Veolia agrees to install activated carbon injection systems
(``ACI systems'') on two incinerators that currently do not have
controls for vapor phase mercury and EPA Region 5 will request a remand
of the CAA Title V renewal permit.

DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be
received by December 15, 2017.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2017-0630, online at www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred method).
For comments submitted at www.regulations.gov, follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact
the person identified in the For Further Information Contact section.
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John T. Krallman, Air and Radiation
Law Office (2344A), Office of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Additional Information About the Proposed Settlement Agreement

    The proposed settlement agreement would resolve the case filed by
Veolia involving EPA Region 5's actions under the CAA title V operating
permit program. On February 15, 2017, Veolia filed a petition with the
Environmental Appeals Board (``EAB'') challenging the CAA Title V
renewal permit issued by EPA Region 5 on January 18, 2017 to Veolia's
facility in Sauget, Illinois (``the Facility'').
    Under the terms of the proposed settlement agreement, among other
changes to the permit, Veolia agrees to install activated carbon
injection systems (``ACI systems'') on two of its incinerators to
control emissions of vapor phase mercury and EPA Region 5 agrees to
request a voluntary remand from the EAB of the CAA Title V renewal
permit issued on January 18, 2017. If this proposed settlement
agreement is finalized, EPA Region 5 will put out a draft CAA Title V
permit for separate public notice and comment period. The revised draft
CAA Title V renewal permit, which is attached to the proposed
settlement agreement, also includes improvements to Veolia's procedures
for analyzing hazardous wastes burned in the incinerators. If the final
CAA Title V renewal permit for the Facility only contains changes from
the revised draft that reflect the inclusion of any final
preconstruction permit that has been issued by the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency for the ACI systems or clerical changes
from the draft CAA Title V permit attached to the proposed settlement
agreement, Veolia agrees that it will not file a petition for review
with the EAB or otherwise challenge the final CAA Title V renewal
permit for the Facility. The proposed settlement agreement provides
that this public notice shall not serve as the notice and comment
period for any

subsequent draft CAA Title V renewal permit for the Facility. The
proposed settlement agreement also provides that nothing in the
settlement agreement limits the discretion of EPA Region 5 to make
changes between the draft CAA Title V renewal permit and the final CAA
Title V renewal permit based on public notice and comment or
information contained in the permit record; nor does the settlement
agreement limit or modify any discretion afforded EPA by the Act or by
general principles of administrative law in taking those actions. See
the proposed settlement agreement for specific details.
    For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the
proposed settlement agreement from persons who are not named as parties
or intervenors to the litigation in question. EPA may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed settlement agreement if the comments
disclose facts or considerations that indicate that such consent is
inappropriate, improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the
requirements of the Act.

II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement
Agreement

A. How can I get a copy of the settlement agreement?

    The official public docket for this action (identified by Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OGC-2017-0630) contains a copy of the proposed settlement
agreement, including the draft CAA Title V renewal permit. The official
public docket is available for public viewing at the Office of
Environmental Information (OEI) Docket in the EPA Docket Center, EPA
West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The EPA
Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the OEI Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    An electronic version of the public docket is available through
www.regulations.gov. You may use www.regulations.gov to submit or view
public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
official public docket, and access those documents in the public docket
that are available electronically. Once in the system, key in the
appropriate docket identification number then select ``search.''
    It is important to note that EPA's policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available
for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without change, unless
the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information claimed as CBI
and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute is not
included in the official public docket or in the electronic public
docket. EPA's policy is that copyrighted material, including
copyrighted material contained in a public comment, will not be placed
in EPA's electronic public docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public docket. Although not all
docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access
any of the publicly available docket materials through the EPA Docket
Center.

B. How and to whom do I submit comments?

    You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period
will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not required to consider these such
comments.
    If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
    Use of the www.regulations.gov Web site to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. The
electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(email) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
email comment directly to the Docket without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.

    Dated: November 1, 2017.
Gautam Srinivasan,
Acting Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2017-24723 Filed 11-14-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 188 (Friday, September 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59755-59756]
[FR Doc No: 2013-23576]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2003-15012]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    In accordance with Part 211 of Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), this document provides the public notice that by a document
dated June 28, 2013, Canadian National Railway (CN) has petitioned the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for an extension of its existing
waiver of compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad
safety regulations contained at Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR) Part 241--United States Locational Requirements for Dispatching
of United States Rail Operations. FRA assigned the petition Docket
Number FRA-2003-15012.
    In its petition, CN requests an extension of its existing waiver of
compliance, pursuant to 49 CFR 241.7(c), to allow the continuation of
Canadian dispatching of that part of the Sprague Subdivision located in
the United States, extending between Baudette and International
Boundary, MN, approximately 43.8 miles; and on those parts of the
Strathroy and Flint Subdivisions located in the United States, forming
a continuous line between Sarnia, ON, Canada, through the St. Clair
River Tunnel, and Port Huron, MI, approximately 3.1 miles, as defined
in Appendix A to Part 241. This request formalizes the request for
waiver requirement contained in Part 241, specifically Sec.
241.7(c)(3), which refers to territory that was previously
grandfathered in the exceptions to extraterritorial dispatching
contained in FRA's interim final rule (see 66 FR 63942, December 11,
2001).
    In this regard, the track segments identified in the interim final
rule remain the same as identified above. With respect to the Sprague
Subdivision, this is part of a continuous line extending between Rainy
River, ON, and Navin, MB, Canada, a distance of 145.2 miles, a portion
of which cuts across a corner of the State of Minnesota, from the U.S./
Canadian border near Baudette, MN (Milepost 1.1), and the U.S./Canadian
border at a point identified as International Boundary, MN (Milepost
44.9), a distance of 43.8 miles. Approximately 15 trains per day are
operated over this segment. Each train that traverses this territory is
operated by the same crew. The entire Sprague Subdivision is single
track and is operated under a centralized traffic control system,
controlled from a single dispatching desk at CN's Rail Traffic Control
Center in Edmonton, AB, Canada. The Strathroy and Flint Subdivisions
are part of a continuous line extending between London, ON, Canada, and
Port Huron, MN, a distance of 61.7 miles, a 3.1-mile portion of which
is located in the United States. Approximately 26 trains per day are
operated over this segment. Each train that traverses this territory is
operated by the same crew. This segment consists of a single track for
approximately 1.1 miles, and two main tracks for the remaining 2.0
miles, and is operated under a centralized traffic control system,
controlled from a single dispatching desk at CN's Rail Traffic Control
Center in Toronto, ON, Canada. Dispatching of all trackage of the
Sprague Subdivision and the Strathroy and Flint Subdivisions is an
entirely English operation and fully dispatched in English. Canadian
Rail Operating Rules (CROR) and CN's Timetable and Special Instructions
govern train operations on this trackage. CN uses English (or Imperial)
units for all aspects of railroad operations, including distance,
speed, and location.
    The CN dispatchers are covered under their company drug and alcohol
policies and their dispatching office is under 24-hour security. The
Transport Canada Rail Safety Directorate has legislative safety
jurisdiction over CN, in accordance with the provisions contained in
Transport Canada's Railway Safety Act, over all federally regulated
railways operating in Canada.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, is available for review online at
www.regulations.gov and in person at the U.S. Department of
Transportation's (DOT) Docket Operations Facility, 1200

New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Operations Facility is open from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal Holidays.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested party
desires an opportunity for oral comment, they should notify FRA, in
writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the basis for
their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Web site: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by November 12, 2013 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered as far as practicable.
    Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications and comments received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the comment (or signing the comment,
if submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
See http://www.regulations.gov/#!privacyNotice for the privacy notice
of regulations.gov or interested parties may review DOT's complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477).

Robert C. Lauby,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Regulatory and Legislative
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2013-23576 Filed 9-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 155 (Monday, August 12, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48927-48928]
[FR Doc No: 2013-19396]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2013-0275]

Hours of Service of Drivers: U.S. Department of Defense (DOD);
Application for Exemption

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of application for exemption; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces that it has received an application from the
U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) Military Surface Deployment and
Distribution Command (SDDC) for an exemption from the minimum 30-minute
rest break provision of the Agency's hours-of-service (HOS) regulations
for commercial motor vehicle (CMV) drivers. The exemption would enable
SDDC's contract motor carriers and their employee-drivers engaged in
the transportation of weapons, munitions, and sensitive/classified
cargo to have the same regulatory flexibility that Sec.  395.1(q)
provides for drivers transporting explosives. The exempted drivers
would be allowed to use 30 minutes or more of attendance time to meet
the HOS rest break requirements, provided they do not perform any other
work during the break. FMCSA requests public comment on SDDC's
application for exemption.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 11, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Federal Docket
Management System Number FMCSA-2013-0275 by any of the following
methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: //www.regulations.gov. Follow
the online instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building, Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.
E.T., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and
docket number. For detailed instructions on submitting comments and
additional information on the exemption process, see the Public
Participation heading below. Note that all comments received will be
posted without change to www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided. Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to www.regulations.gov, and follow the online
instructions for accessing the dockets, or go to the street address
listed above.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review a
Privacy Act notice regarding our public dockets in the January 17,
2008, issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
    Public Participation: The Federal eRulemaking Portal is available
24 hours each day, 365 days each year. You can get electronic
submission and retrieval help and guidelines under the ``help'' section
of the Federal eRulemaking Portal Web site. If you want us to notify
you that we received your comments, please include a self-addressed,
stamped envelope or postcard, or print the acknowledgement page that
appears after submitting comments online. Comments received

after the comment closing date will be included in the docket, and we
will consider late comments to the extent practicable.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Pearlie Robinson, FMCSA Driver and
Carrier Operations Division; Office of Bus and Truck Standards and
Operations; Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. Email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    FMCSA has authority under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315 to grant
exemptions from certain parts of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Regulations. FMCSA must publish a notice of each exemption request in
the Federal Register (49 CFR 381.315(a)). The Agency must provide the
public an opportunity to inspect the information relevant to the
application, including any safety analyses that have been conducted.
The Agency must also provide an opportunity for public comment on the
request.
    The Agency reviews safety analyses and public comments submitted,
and determines whether granting the exemption would likely achieve a
level of safety equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved by the current regulation (49 CFR 381.305). The decision of
the Agency must be published in the Federal Register (49 CFR
381.315(b)) with the reasons for denying or granting the application
and, if granted, the name of the person or class of persons receiving
the exemption, and the regulatory provision from which the exemption is
granted. The notice must also specify the effective period and explain
the terms and conditions of the exemption. The exemption may be renewed
(49 CFR 381.300(b)).

Request for Exemption

    On December 27, 2011 (76 FR 81133), FMCSA published a final rule
amending its hours of service (HOS) regulations for drivers of
property-carrying commercial motor vehicles (CMVs). The final rule
adopted several changes to the HOS regulations including a new
provision requiring drivers to take a rest break during the work day
under certain circumstances. Drivers may drive only if no more than 8
hours have passed since the end of the driver's last off-duty period of
at least 30 minutes.
    FMCSA did not specify when drivers must take the break, but the
rule requires that they wait no longer than 8 hours after the last off-
duty period of 30 minutes or more to take that break. Drivers who
already take shorter breaks during the work day could comply with the
rule by taking one of the shorter breaks and extending it to 30
minutes. The new requirement took effect on July 1, 2013.
    The Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command (SDDC)
manages the motor carrier industry contracts for the Department of
Defense (DOD). Certain motor carriers under contract to the SDDC
provide protective services while transporting weapons, munitions, and
sensitive/classified cargo.
    SDDC requests a limited exemption from the HOS regulation
pertaining to rest breaks [49 CFR 395.3(a)(3)(ii)] to allow SDDC-
contracted drivers providing dual driver-protective services to be
treated the same as drivers transporting explosives, as provided in
Sec.  395.1(q). Section 395.1(q) states that operators of CMVs carrying
Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 explosives subject to the requirement for a
minimum 30-minute rest break in Sec.  395.3(a)(3)(ii) may use 30
minutes or more of ``attendance time'' to meet the requirement for a
rest break. SDDC believes that shipments moved under the requested
exemption would achieve a level of safety and security that is at least
equivalent to what would be obtained by following the normal break
requirements in Sec.  395.3(a)(3)(ii).
    SDDC states that it requires continuous attendance and surveillance
of such shipments until they reach their final destination. SDDC states
that it has instituted several technical and administrative controls to
ensure the efficient transportation of cargo requiring protective
services, controls that would remain in effect under the requested
exemption. They include the following:
     Conducting review of carrier compliance requirements and
procedures for moving hazardous cargo.
     Evaluating carrier authority to operate on United States
roadways.
     Evaluating carrier compliance with the Federal Motor
Carrier Safety Administration's Compliance Safety Accountability
program Safety Measurement System standards.
     Providing over-the-road vehicle surveillance.
     Inspecting carrier facilities and corporate headquarters
for compliance with DOD and DOT standards.
    Further details regarding SDDC's safety controls can be found in
its application for exemption. The application can be accessed in the
docket identified at the beginning of this notice. SDDC asserts that
granting the exemption would allow driver teams to manage their en-
route rest periods efficiently and also perform mandated shipment
security surveillance, resulting in both safe driving performance and
greater security of cargo during long-distance trips.
    SDDC anticipates no safety impacts from this exemption and believes
that its contract employee drivers should be allowed to follow the
requirements in Sec.  395.1(q) when transporting shipments of sensitive
DOD cargo. SDDC believes that shipments made under the requested
exemption would achieve a level of safety and security that is at least
equivalent to that which would be obtained by following the normal
break requirement in Sec.  395.3(a)(3)(ii).
    SDDC indicated that 40 contract carriers with 1,942 power units and
3,000 drivers would be covered by the exemption. The proposed exemption
would be effective for 2 years, the maximum period allowed by Sec.
381.300.

Request for Comments

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315(b)(4), FMCSA
requests public comment on SDDC's application for an exemption from
certain provisions of 49 CFR part 395. The Agency will consider all
comments received by close of business on September 11, 2013. Comments
will be available for examination in the docket at the location listed
under the ADDRESSES section of this notice. The Agency will consider to
the extent practicable comments received in the public docket after the
closing date of the comment period.

    Issued on: August 2, 2013.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2013-19396 Filed 8-9-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

ALITALIA-LINEE AEREE ITALIANE-S.p.A.

And

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES

And

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC.

Under 14 C.F.R. Part 212 for blanket statements of authorization to engage in codeshare services	)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)	     Docket OST-99-6501

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARE SERVICES

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

Andrea Fischer Newman

Senior Vice President, Government Affairs

David G. Mishkin

Vice President, International &

   Regulatory Affairs

Megan Rae Rosia

Managing Director, Government Affairs & Associate General Counsel

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC.

901 15th Street, N.W.

Suite 310

Washington, D.C.  20005

(202) 842-3193	Paul V. Mifsud

Vice President, Government &

Legal Affairs – USA

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES

2501 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20037

(202) 955-7993

	Dated:  April 9, 2001

	BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Joint Application of

ALITALIA-LINEE AEREE ITALIANE-S.p.A.

And

KLM ROYAL DUTCH AIRLINES

And

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC.

Under 14 C.F.R. Part 212 for blanket statements of authorization to engage in codeshare services	)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)	     Docket OST-99-6501

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARE SERVICES

Pursuant to conditions (b) and (f) of the Department’s Action dated January 5, 2000 in this docket, KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (“KLM”) and Northwest Airlines, Inc. (“Northwest”) provide notice that KLM’s “KL” designator code will be displayed on the following flights:

Market					Operator				Implementation Date

Memphis, TN-Fort Lauderdale, FL	Northwest				30 days or after

Detroit, MI-Lansing, MI		Northwest Airlink (Express I)		May 15, 2001 or after

Memphis, TN-Columbus, OH	Northwest Airlink (Express I)		June 1, 2001 or after

Memphis, TN-Greensboro, NC	Northwest				June 1, 2001 or after

Detroit, MI-Evansville, IN		Northwest Airlink (Express I)		June 1, 2001 or after

Detroit, MI-Bozeman, MT		Northwest				June 2, 2001 or after

						Respectfully submitted,

		/s/Megan Rae Rosia/s/

	Megan Rae Rosia

	Managing Director, Government Affairs &

	Associate General Counsel

	Northwest Airlines, Inc.

	901 15th Street, N.W., Suite 310

	Washington, DC  20005

<PHONE_NUMBER>

	  HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Dated:  April 9, 2001

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this 9th day of April 2001, a copy of the foregoing document of Northwest Airlines, Inc. was served on the following:

Nicholas Lacey, Director

Director, Flight Standards

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Avenue, S.W.

Suite 821

Washington, D.C.  20591

(BY MAIL)

Carl B. Nelson, Jr.

Associate General Counsel

American Airlines, Inc.

1101 Seventeenth Street, N.W.

Suite 600

Washington, D.C.  20036

  HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> (BY E-MAIL)

Robert E. Cohn

Counsel for Delta Air Lines, Inc.

Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge

2300 N Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20037

  HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> (BY E-MAIL)

Donald T. Bliss

Counsel for US Airways, Inc.

O’Melveny & Myers LLP

555 13th Street, N.W.

Suite 500 West

Washington, D.C.  20004

  HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> (BY E-MAIL)

Jeffrey A. Manley

Counsel for United Airlines

Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering

2445 M Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.  20037

  HYPERLINK<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> (BY E-MAIL)

Thomas J. White

Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary

  for Transportation

Department of State

2201 C Street, N.W.

Room 5830

Washington, DC  20520

(BY MAIL)

U.S. Department of Defense

U.S. Transcom TCJ5

Attn:  Air Mobility Analysis

508 Scott Drive

Scott AFB, IL  62225-5357

(BY MAIL)

/s/Fawn A. Severino/s/

Fawn A. Severino

(continued…)