[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 120 (Thursday, June 23, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 37454-37459]
[FR Doc No: 2022-13306]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 87, No. 120 / Thursday, June 23, 2022 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0682; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01271-T]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2016-10-08, AD 2017-05-10, and AD 2019-01-05, which apply to certain
Airbus SAS Model A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes;
and AD 2019-20-13, which applies to certain Airbus SAS Model A330-200,
A330-200 Freighter, A330-300, A340-200, A340-300, A340-500, and A340-
600 series airplanes. AD 2016-10-08 requires determining the flight
cycles accumulated on certain trimmable horizontal stabilizer actuators
(THSAs), and replacing the THSA if necessary. AD 2017-05-10, AD 2019-
01-05, and AD 2019-20-13 require revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program, as applicable. Since the FAA issued those ADs, the
FAA has determined that new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations are necessary. This proposed AD would require revising the
existing maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate additional new or more restrictive airworthiness
limitations, as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation by reference. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by August 8,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For EASA material that will be incorporated by reference (IBR) in
this AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this material on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. For Airbus SAS service information
identified in this proposed AD, contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness
Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex,
France; telephone +33 5 61 93 36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email
[email protected]; internet https://www.airbus.com. You
may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-
231-3195. It is also available in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-
0682.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0682; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments
received, and other information. The street address for Docket
Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer,
Large Aircraft Section, FAA, International Validation Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-0682; Project Identifier
MCAI-2021-01271-T'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Vladimir Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA,
International Validation Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected]. Any
commentary that the FAA receives

which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the
public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    The FAA issued AD 2016-10-08, Amendment 39-18519 (81 FR 31844, May
20, 2016) (AD 2016-10-08), which applies to certain Airbus SAS Model
A330-200, A330-200 Freighter, A330-300, A340-200, A340-300, A340-500,
and A340-600 series airplanes. Airbus SAS Model A340-200, A340-300,
A340-500, and A340-600 series airplanes were included in AD 2016-10-08,
but are not included in this proposed AD. Airbus SAS Model A340-200,
A340-300, A340-500, and A340-600 series airplanes are not included in
this proposed AD because EASA included these airplanes in EASA AD 2021-
0250, dated November 17, 2021 (EASA AD 2021-0250), and the FAA has
added the MCAI to the required airworthiness actions list (RAAL) for
Model A340 airplanes. AD 2016-10-08 requires inspecting certain THSAs
to determine the number of total flight cycles the THSA has
accumulated, and replacing the THSA if necessary. The FAA issued AD
2016-10-08 to detect and correct premature wear of the carbon friction
disks on the no-back brake of the THSA. Such a condition could lead to
reduced braking efficiency in certain load conditions and, in
conjunction with the inability of the power gear train to keep the ball
screw in its last commanded position, could result in uncommanded
movements of the trimmable horizontal stabilizer and loss of control of
the airplane.
    The FAA issued AD 2017-05-10, Amendment 39-18821 (82 FR 13379,
March 13, 2017) (AD 2017-05-10), which applies to certain Airbus SAS
Model A330-200, A330-200 Freighter, and A330-300 series airplanes. AD
2017-05-10 requires revising the maintenance or inspection program to
incorporate new maintenance requirements and airworthiness limitations.
The FAA issued AD 2017-05-10 to prevent reduced structural integrity
and reduced control of these airplanes due to the failure of system
components.
    The FAA issued AD 2019-01-05, Amendment 39-19544 (84 FR 4310,
February 15, 2019) (AD 2019-01-05), which applies to certain Airbus SAS
Model A330-200, A330-200 Freighter, and A330-300 series airplanes. AD
2019-01-05 requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection
program to incorporate new maintenance requirements and airworthiness
limitations. The FAA issued AD 2019-01-05 to prevent reduced airplane
control due to the failure of system components. AD 2019-01-05
specifies that accomplishing the revision required by paragraph (g) of
that AD terminates all requirements of AD 2017-05-10.
    The FAA issued AD 2019-20-13, Amendment 39-19766 (84 FR 56378,
October 22, 2019) (AD 2019-20-13), which applies to certain Airbus SAS
Model A330-200, A330-200 Freighter, and A330-300 series airplanes. AD
2019-20-13 requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection
program, as applicable, to incorporate new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations. The FAA issued AD 2019-20-13 to address the
failure of system components, which could reduce the controllability of
the airplane. AD 2019-20-13 specifies that accomplishing the actions
required by that AD terminates all requirements of AD 2019-01-05.
Additionally, AD 2019-20-13 specifies that accomplishing the action
required by task number<PHONE_NUMBER>4-1-E of Airbus A330 Airworthiness
Limitations Section (ALS) Part 4, System Equipment Maintenance
Requirements (SEMR), Revision 07, dated October 15, 2018, within the
compliance time specified for that task in Airbus A330 Airworthiness
Limitations Section (ALS) Part 4, System Equipment Maintenance
Requirements (SEMR), Revision 07, dated October 15, 2018, terminates
all requirements of AD 2017-25-13, Amendment 39-19127 (82 FR 59960,
December 18, 2017) (AD 2017-25-13), for Airbus SAS Model A330-200, -200
Freighter, and -300 series airplanes only. Lastly, AD 2019-20-13
specifies that accomplishing the action required by task number 213100-
00001-1-E of Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part
4, System Equipment Maintenance Requirements (SEMR), Revision 07, dated
October 15, 2018, within the compliance time specified for that task in
Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part 4, System
Equipment Maintenance Requirements (SEMR), Revision 07, dated October
15, 2018, terminates all requirements of AD 2014-16-22, Amendment 39-
17946 (79 FR 49442, August 21, 2014) (AD 2014-16-22) for Airbus SAS
Model A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes only.

Actions Since AD 2016-10-08, AD 2017-05-10, AD 2019-01-05, and AD 2019-
20-13 Were Issued

    Since the FAA issued AD 2016-10-08, AD 2017-05-10, AD 2019-01-05,
and AD 2019-20-13, the FAA has determined that new or more restrictive
airworthiness limitations are necessary. The required actions mandated
in AD 2016-10-08 are incorporated into Airbus A330 Airworthiness
Limitations Section (ALS) Part 4, System Equipment Maintenance
Requirements (SEMR), Revision 08, dated July 1, 2021 (which is referred
to in EASA AD 2021-0250, dated November 17, 2021) (EASA AD 2021-0250)
(also referred to as the MCAI).
    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2021-0250 to correct an unsafe
condition for all Airbus SAS Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, and -243
airplanes; Model A330-223F and -243F airplanes; Model A330-301, -302, -
303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342, and -343 airplanes; Model A330-841
airplanes; and Model A330-941 airplanes.
    Airplanes with an original airworthiness certificate or original
export certificate of airworthiness issued after July 1, 2021, must
comply with the airworthiness limitations specified as part of the
approved type design and referenced on the type certificate data sheet;
this AD therefore does not include those airplanes in the
applicability.
    This proposed AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the failure of system components, which
could reduce the controllability of the airplane. See the MCAI for
additional background information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2021-0250 describes airworthiness limitations for system
equipment maintenance requirements.
    This proposed AD would require Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27-
3199, dated July 15, 2014, which the Director of the Federal Register
approved for incorporation by reference as of June 24, 2016 (81 FR
31844, May 20, 2016).
    This proposed AD would also require A330 Airworthiness Limitations
Section (ALS) Part 4, System Equipment Maintenance Requirements (SEMR),
Revision 07, dated October 15, 2018, which the Director of the Federal
Register approved for incorporation by reference as of November 26,
2019 (84 FR 56378, October 22, 2019).
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

FAA's Determination

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would retain the requirements of AD 2016-10-08 and
AD 2019-20-13. This proposed AD would require revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate new or
more restrictive airworthiness limitations, which are specified in EASA
AD 2021-0250 described previously, as proposed for incorporation by
reference. Accomplishing the actions required by this proposed AD would
terminate all requirements of AD 2014-16-22 for Airbus SAS Model A330-
200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes only, and would
terminate all requirements of AD 2017-25-13 for Airbus SAS Model A330-
200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes only. Any differences
with EASA AD 2021-0250 are identified as exceptions in the regulatory
text of this AD.
    This proposed AD would require revisions to certain operator
maintenance documents to include new actions (e.g., inspections).
Compliance with these actions is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For
airplanes that have been previously modified, altered, or repaired in
the areas addressed by this proposed AD, the operator may not be able
to accomplish the actions described in the revisions. In this
situation, to comply with 14 CFR 91.403(c), the operator must request
approval for an alternative method of compliance (AMOC) according to
paragraph (s)(1) of this proposed AD.

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2021-0250 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with
EASA AD 2021-0250 in its entirety through that incorporation, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading
of a particular section in EASA AD 2021-0250 does not mean that
operators need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,''
compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section
titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2021-
0250. Service information required by EASA AD 2021-0250 for compliance
will be available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0682 after the FAA final rule is
published.

Airworthiness Limitation ADs Using the New Process

    The FAA's process of incorporating by reference MCAI ADs as the
primary source of information for compliance with corresponding FAA ADs
has been limited to certain MCAI ADs (primarily those with service
bulletins as the primary source of information for accomplishing the
actions required by the FAA AD). However, the FAA is now expanding the
process to include MCAI ADs that require a change to airworthiness
limitation documents, such as airworthiness limitation sections.
    For these ADs that incorporate by reference an MCAI AD that changes
airworthiness limitations, the FAA requirements are unchanged.
Operators must revise the existing maintenance or inspection program,
as applicable, to incorporate the information specified in the new
airworthiness limitation document. The airworthiness limitations must
be followed according to 14 CFR 91.403(c) and 91.409(e).
    The previous format of the airworthiness limitation ADs included a
paragraph that specified that no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections) or intervals may be used unless the actions and intervals
are approved as an AMOC in accordance with the procedures specified in
the AMOCs paragraph under ``Additional FAA Provisions.'' This new
format includes a ``New Provisions for Alternative Actions and
Intervals'' paragraph that does not specifically refer to AMOCs, but
operators may still request an AMOC to use an alternative action or
interval.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 138 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
    The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the retained
actions from AD 2016-10-08 to be $255 per product (3 work-hours x $85
per work-hour) for inspecting the THSA for a total cost for U.S.
operators of $35,190. The retained on-condition cost for AD 2016-10-08
is $724,511 per product (23 work-hours x $85 per work-hour). The FAA
estimates the total cost per operator for the retained actions from AD
2019-20-13 to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).
    The FAA has determined that revising the existing maintenance or
inspection program takes an average of 90 work-hours per operator,
although the agency recognizes that this number may vary from operator
to operator. Since operators incorporate maintenance or inspection
program changes for their affected fleet(s), the FAA has determined
that a per-operator estimate is more accurate than a per-airplane
estimate.
    The FAA estimates the total cost per operator for the new proposed
actions to be $7,650 (90 work-hours x $85 per work-hour).

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or

on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) AD 2016-10-08, Amendment 39-
18519 (81 FR 31844, May 20, 2016); AD 2017-05-10, Amendment 39-18821
(82 FR 13379, March 13, 2017); AD 2019-01-05, Amendment 39-19544 (84 FR
4310, February 15, 2019); and AD 2019-20-13, Amendment 39-19766 (84 FR
56378, October 22, 2019); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2022-0682; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-
01271-T.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by August 8, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    (1) This AD replaces the ADs identified in paragraphs (b)(1)(i)
through (iv) of this AD.
    (i) AD 2016-10-08, Amendment 39-18519 (81 FR 31844, May 20,
2016) (AD 2016-10-08).
    (ii) AD 2017-05-10, Amendment 39-18821 (82 FR 13379, March 13,
2017) (AD 2017-05-10).
    (iii) AD 2019-01-05, Amendment 39-19544 (84 FR 4310, February
15, 2019) (AD 2019-01-05).
    (iv) AD 2019-20-13, Amendment 39-19766 (84 FR 56378, October 22,
2019) (AD 2019-20-13).
    (2) This AD affects AD 2014-16-22, Amendment 39-17946 (79 FR
49442, August 21, 2014) (AD 2014-16-22); and AD 2017-25-13,
Amendment 39-19127 (82 FR 59960, December 18, 2017) (AD 2017-25-13).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus SAS airplanes specified in paragraphs
(c)(1) through (5) of this AD, certificated in any category, with an
original airworthiness certificate or original export certificate of
airworthiness issued on or before July 1, 2021.
    (1) Model A330-201, -202, -203, -223, and -243 airplanes.
    (2) Model A330-223F and -243F airplanes.
    (3) Model A330-301, -302, -303, -321, -322, -323, -341, -342,
and -343 airplanes.
    (4) Model A330-841 airplanes.
    (5) Model A330-941 airplanes.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a determination that new or more
restrictive airworthiness limitations are necessary. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address the failure of system components, which
could reduce the controllability of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Inspection To Determine Trimmable Horizontal Stabilizer
Actuator (THSA) Part Number and Accumulated Total Flight Cycles, With
Removed References to Certain Models

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2016-10-08, with removed references to certain models. For Model
A330-200 Freighter, A330-200, and A330-300 series airplanes: Within
90 days after June 24, 2016 (the effective date of AD 2016-10-08),
inspect the THSA to determine if it has part number 47147-500,
47147-700, 47172-300, 47172-500, 47172-510, or 47172-520, and to
determine the total number of flight cycles accumulated since the
THSA's first installation on an airplane, or since the most recent
no-back brake (NBB) replacement. A review of airplane delivery or
maintenance records is acceptable in lieu of this inspection if the
part number of the THSA can be conclusively determined from that
review. Accomplishing the revision of the existing maintenance or
inspection program required by paragraph (o) of this AD terminates
the requirements of this paragraph.

(h) Retained THSA Replacement for Model A330-200 Freighter, A330-200,
A330-300, With Removed References to Certain Models and Service
Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2016-10-08, with removed references to certain models and service
information. For Model A330-200 Freighter, A330-200, and A330-300
series airplanes having a THSA with a part number specified in
paragraph (g) of this AD: At the applicable time specified in
paragraph (h)(1), (2), or (3) of this AD, replace each affected THSA
with a serviceable THSA, in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27-3199, dated July 15,
2014. Accomplishing the revision of the existing maintenance or
inspection program required by paragraph (o) of this AD terminates
the requirements of this paragraph.

    Note 1 to paragraphs (h) and (i):  The THSA life limits
specified in Part 4--Aging System Maintenance of the Airbus A330
Airworthiness Limitations Sections are still relevant, as applicable
to airplane model and THSA part number.

    (1) For a THSA that has accumulated or exceeded 20,000 total
flight cycles since the THSA's first installation on an airplane, or
since the most recent NBB replacement, whichever is later, as of
June 24, 2016 (the effective date of AD 2016-10-08): Within 6 months
after June 24, 2016.
    (2) For a THSA that has accumulated or exceeded 16,000 total
flight cycles, but less than 20,000 total flight cycles since the
THSA's first installation on an airplane, or since the most recent
NBB replacement, whichever is later, as of June 24, 2016 (the
effective date of AD 2016-10-08): Within 12 months after June 24,
2016, but without exceeding 20,000 total flight cycles.
    (3) For a THSA that has accumulated less than 16,000 total
flight cycles since first installation on an airplane, or since the
most recent NBB replacement, whichever is later, as of June 24, 2016
(the effective date of AD 2016-10-08): At the applicable time
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD.

(i) Retained Replacement Times for Model A330-200 Freighter, A330-200,
and A330-300 Series Airplanes With THSAs Having Less Than 16,000 Total
Flight Cycles as of the Effective Date of This AD, With Removed
References to Certain Models and Service Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2016-10-08, with removed references to certain models and service
information. The requirements of this paragraph apply to Model A330-
200 Freighter, A330-200, and A330-300 series airplanes having a THSA
with a part number specified in paragraph (g) of this AD that has
accumulated less than 16,000 total flight cycles since first
installation on an airplane, or since the most recent NBB
replacement, whichever is later, as of June 24, 2016 (the effective
date of AD 2016-10-08). Not later than the date specified in
paragraphs (i)(1), (2), and (3) of this AD, as applicable: For any
THSA having reached or exceeded on that date the corresponding
number of total flight cycles as specified in paragraphs (i)(1),
(2), and (3) of this AD, as applicable, replace the THSA with a
serviceable unit, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27-3199, dated July 15, 2014.
Accomplishing the revision of the existing maintenance or inspection
program required by paragraph (o) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this paragraph.
    (1) As of 12 months after June 24, 2016 (the effective date of
AD 2016-10-08): The THSA flight-cycle limit (since first
installation on an airplane, or since last NBB replacement,

whichever occurs later) is 16,000 total flight cycles.
    (2) As of July 31, 2017: The THSA flight-cycle limit (since
first installation on an airplane, or since last NBB replacement,
whichever occurs later) is 14,000 total flight cycles.
    (3) As of July 31, 2018: The THSA flight-cycle limit (since
first installation on an airplane, or since last NBB replacement,
whichever occurs later) is 12,000 total flight cycles.

(j) Retained THSA Replacement Intervals for Model A330-200 Freighter,
A330-200, and A330-300 Series Airplanes, With Removed Service
Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (k) of AD
2016-10-08, with removed service information. For Model A330-200
Freighter, A330-200, and A330-300 series airplanes with any part
installed, as required by paragraph (h) or (i) of this AD, having a
part number identified in paragraph (g) of this AD: From the dates
specified in paragraph (i) of this AD, as applicable, and prior to
exceeding the accumulated number of total flight cycles
corresponding to each time, replace each affected THSA with a
serviceable part, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions
of Airbus Service Bulletin A330-27-3199, dated July 15, 2014.
Accomplishing the revision of the existing maintenance or inspection
program required by paragraph (o) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this paragraph.

(k) Retained Definition of Serviceable THSA, With Updated Paragraph
References

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (l) of AD
2016-10-08, with updated paragraph references. For the purposes of
paragraphs (g) through (j) and (l) of this AD, a serviceable THSA is
a THSA:
    (1) Having a part number identified in paragraph (g) of this AD
that has not exceeded any of the total accumulated flight cycles
identified in paragraphs (i)(1) through (3) of this AD; or
    (2) Having a part number that is not identified in paragraph (g)
of this AD.

(l) Retained Parts Installation Limitation, With Updated Paragraph
References

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (m) of AD
2016-10-08, with updated paragraph references. For Model A330-200
Freighter, A330-200, and A330-300 series airplanes: From each date
specified in paragraphs (i)(1), (2), and (3) of this AD, a THSA
having a part number identified in paragraph (g) of this AD may be
installed on any airplane, provided the THSA has not exceeded the
corresponding number of accumulated total flight cycles.
Accomplishing the revision of the existing maintenance or inspection
program required by paragraph (o) of this AD terminates the
requirements of this paragraph.

(m) Retained Revision of the Existing Maintenance or Inspection
Program, With No Changes

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2019-20-13, with no changes. For Model A330-200 Freighter, A330-200,
and A330-300 series airplanes with an original airworthiness
certificate or original export certificate of airworthiness issued
on or before October 15, 2018: Within 90 days after November 26,
2019 (the effective date of AD 2019-20-13), revise the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to incorporate the
information specified in Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations
Section (ALS) Part 4, System Equipment Maintenance Requirements
(SEMR), Revision 07, dated October 15, 2018. The component life
limits and the initial compliance time for doing the tasks are at
the times specified in Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section
(ALS) Part 4, System Equipment Maintenance Requirements (SEMR),
Revision 07, dated October 15, 2018, or within 90 days after
November 26, 2019, whichever occurs later. Accomplishing the
revision of the existing maintenance or inspection program required
by paragraph (o) of this AD terminates the requirements of this
paragraph.

(n) Retained Restrictions on Alternative Actions and Intervals, With a
New Exception

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2019-20-13, with a new exception. Except as required by paragraph
(o) of this AD, after the existing maintenance or inspection program
has been revised as required by paragraph (m) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be used
unless the actions and intervals are approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the procedures
specified in paragraph (s)(1) of this AD.

 (o) New Revision of the Existing Maintenance or Inspection Program

    Except as specified in paragraph (p) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2021-0250, dated November 17, 2021 (EASA AD
2021-0250). Accomplishing the revision of the existing maintenance
or inspection program required by this paragraph terminates the
requirements of paragraphs (g), through (j), (l), and (m) of this
AD.

(p) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021-0250

    (1) Where EASA AD 2021-0250 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) The requirements specified in paragraphs (1) and (2) of EASA
AD 2021-0250 do not apply to this AD.
    (3) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2021-0250 specifies to ``revise the
AMP'' within 12 months after its effective date, but this AD
requires revising the existing maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, within 90 days after the effective date of this AD.
    (4) The initial compliance time for doing the tasks specified in
paragraph (3) of EASA 2021-0250 is at the applicable ``limitations
and associated thresholds'' as incorporated by the requirements of
paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2021-0250, or within 90 days after the
effective date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
    (5) The provisions specified in paragraphs (4) and (5) of EASA
AD 2021-0250 do not apply to this AD.
    (6) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2021-0250 does not apply
to this AD.

(q) New Provisions for Alternative Actions and Intervals

    After the existing maintenance or inspection program has been
revised as required by paragraph (o) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) and intervals are allowed unless they
are approved as specified in the provisions of the ``Ref.
Publications'' section of EASA AD 2021-0250.

(r) Terminating Action for AD 2014-16-22 and AD 2017-25-13

    (1) Accomplishing the action required by task number 213100-
00001-1-E of Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS)
Part 4, System Equipment Maintenance Requirements (SEMR), Revision
07, dated October 15, 2018, or using ``The ALS'' specified in EASA
AD 2021-0250, within the compliance time specified for that task
terminates all requirements of AD 2014-16-22 for Airbus SAS Model
A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes only.
    (2) Accomplishing the action required by task number 274400-
000041-E of Airbus A330 Airworthiness Limitations Section (ALS) Part
4, System Equipment Maintenance Requirements (SEMR), Revision 07,
dated October 15, 2018, or using ``The ALS'' specified in EASA AD
2021-0250, within the compliance time specified for that task
terminates all requirements of AD 2017-25-13 for Airbus SAS Model
A330-200, -200 Freighter, and -300 series airplanes only.

(s) Additional FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (t)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(t) Related Information

    (1) For EASA AD 2021-0250, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet

www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA AD on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material may be
found in the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0682.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Vladimir
Ulyanov, Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, FAA,
International Validation Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].
    (3) For Airbus SAS service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus SAS, Airworthiness Office--EIAS, Rond-Point Emile
Dewoitine No: 2, 31700 Blagnac Cedex, France; telephone +33 5 61 93
36 96; fax +33 5 61 93 44 51; email [email protected];
internet https://www.airbus.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued on June 16, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-13306 Filed 6-22-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: September 16, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 180)]
[Notices]
[Page 53418-53419]
[DOCID:fr16se08-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER02-2551-004]

Cargill Power Markets, LLC; Notice of Filing

September 9, 2008.
    Take notice that on August 21, 2008, Cargill Power Markets, LLC
filed a supplemental to its June 30, 2008, Category 1 status filing.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on September 21, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-21539 Filed 9-15-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 135 (Monday, July 17, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32745-32749]
[FR Doc No: 2017-14885]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-81115; File No. SR-NYSEMKT-2017-38]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE MKT LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange Rules
To Eliminate ALO and Day ISO Orders and Related Functionality, Provide
That All Pegged Orders Would Be Non-Displayed Orders, Change References
From ``NYSE MKT'' to ``NYSE American,'' and Add the Definition of
``NYSE American Marketplace''

July 11, 2017.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act''),\2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that on June 29, 2017, NYSE MKT LLC (the ``Exchange'' or ``NYSE
MKT'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange rules to (1) eliminate ALO
and Day ISO orders and related functionality; (2) provide that all
Pegged Orders would be non-displayed orders; (3) change references from
``NYSE MKT'' to ``NYSE American''; (4) add the definition of ``NYSE
American Marketplace''; and (5) make other conforming rule changes. The
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of these statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend Exchange rules to (1) eliminate Add
Liquidity Only (``ALO'') Orders and Day Intermarket Sweep Orders
(``ISO'') and related functionality; (2) provide that all Pegged Orders
would be non-displayed orders; (3) change references from ``NYSE MKT''
to ``NYSE American''; (4) add the definition of ``NYSE American
Marketplace''; and (5) make other conforming rule changes.
    To effect its transition to Pillar, the Exchange has adopted the
rule numbering framework of the NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE Arca
Equities'') rules for Exchange cash equities trading on the Pillar
trading platform.\4\ As described in the Framework Filing, the Exchange
is denoting the rules applicable to cash equities trading on Pillar
with the letter ``E'' to distinguish such rules from current Exchange
rules with the same numbering. The Exchange's trading rules for cash
equity trading on Pillar are also based on the trading rules of NYSE
Arca Equities.\5\ As described in the Trading Rules Filing, with
Pillar, the Exchange will transition its cash equities trading platform
from a Floor-based market with a parity allocation model to a fully
automated price-time priority allocation model that trades all NMS
Stocks. In addition, the Exchange will introduce a delay mechanism on
Pillar that will add the equivalent of 350 microseconds of latency to
inbound and outbound order messages, as described in greater detail in
Rules 1.1E(y) and 7.29E(b).\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79242 (November 4,
2016), 81 FR 79081 (November 10, 2016) (SR-NYSEMKT-2016-97) (Notice
and Filing of Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change) (the
``Framework Filing''). In addition, the Exchange has filed a
proposed rule change to support Exchange trading of securities
listed on other national securities exchanges on an unlisted trading
privileges basis, including Exchange Traded Products (``ETP'')
listed on other exchanges. See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
79400 (November 25, 2016), 81 FR 86750 (December 1, 2016) (SR-
NYSEMKT-2016-103) (Notice) and 81038 (June 28, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-
2016-103) (Approval Order) (the ``ETP Listing Rules Filing'').
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80590 (May 4,
2017), 82 FR 21843 (May 10, 2017) (Approval Order) and 79993
(February 9, 2017), 82 FR 10814 (February 15, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-
2017-01) (Notice) (``Trading Rules Filing''). The Exchange also has
established market maker obligations when trading on the Pillar
trading platform. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80577 (May
2, 2017), 82 FR 21446 (May 8, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-04) (Approval
Order).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80700 (May 16,
2017), 82 FR 23381 (May 22, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-05) (Approval
Order) and 79998 (February 9, 2017), 82 FR 10828 (February 15, 2017)
(SR-NYSEMKT-2017-05) (Notice) (``Delay Mechanism Filing'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Delay Mechanism Filing, the Exchange represented that in
conjunction with implementing the Delay Mechanism, it would no longer
offer ALO or Day ISO functionality and all Pegged Orders would not be
displayed.\7\ Because the Exchange has

not yet transitioned to Pillar, the Exchange proposes to amend its
rules relating to ALO, Day ISO, and Pegged Orders before transitioning
to Pillar, as described in the Delay Mechanism Filing, so that it can
implement the Delay Mechanism when it transitions to Pillar. The
Exchange proposes additional amendments to its rules, described below,
before implementing the Pillar trading platform.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ Rule 7.31E (Orders and Modifiers) currently describes ALO
Orders, Day ISO Orders, and Pegged Orders. These order types are
based on NYSE Arca Equities ALO, Day ISO, and Pegged Orders,
including that Primary Pegged Orders are required to have a minimum
display quantity. In the Delay Mechanism Filing, the Exchange
represented that, before implementing the Delay Mechanism, the
Exchange would file a separate proposed rule change to eliminate ALO
and Day ISO Orders and related functionality and to provide that
Primary Pegged Orders would not be displayed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Rule Changes
    To eliminate ALO Orders, the Exchange proposes to delete rule text
relating to ALO Orders and Non-Display Remove Modifiers, which is
functionality that is operative only in conjunction with a contra-side
incoming ALO Order. The Exchange would make the following changes to
its rules:
     Delete Rule 7.31E(e)(2) and its subparagraphs, which
describe ALO Orders, and replace that section of the Rule with the term
``Reserved.''
     Delete Rule 7.31E(d)(2)(B), which provides that Limit Non-
Display Orders may be designated with a Non-Display Remove Modifier.
     Delete the last sentence of Rule 7.31E(d)(3)(E) and Rules
7.31E(d)(3)(F) and (G), which describe MPL-ALO Orders and related Non-
Display Remove Modifier functionality.
     Delete Rule 7.31E(e)(1)(C), which provides that an MKT
Only Order may be designated with a Non-Display Remove Modifier.
     Amend Rule 7.31E(j)(1) to delete the reference to ``ALO
Order.''
     Amend Rules 7.46E(f)(5)(F)(ii) and (iii) to delete
references to ALO Orders.
    To effect the changes described in the Delay Mechanism Filing to
eliminate Day ISO Orders, the Exchange proposes to delete text relating
to Day ISOs and amend its rules as follows:
     Delete Rules 7.31E(e)(3)(C) and (D), which describe Day
ISO and Day ISO ALO Orders. The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule
7.31E(e)(3) to provide that an ISO must be designated IOC and to delete
the specific reference to ``IOC ISO'' in Rule 7.31E(e)(3)(B).
     Amend Rules 7.11E(a)(5P)(A) and 7.11E(a)(5P)(A)(ii) to
delete references to ``Day ISO'' and make related conforming changes.
     Amend Rule 7.31E(a)(2)(C) to delete the last two
sentences, which describes how Limit Orders are repriced upon arrival
of a Day ISO.
     Amend Rule 7.35E(h)(3)(C) to delete the last sentence,
which describes how Day ISOs are processed when transitioning to
continuous trading.
     Delete current Rule 7.46E(f)(5)(F)(i)(a), which relates to
Day ISO Orders, and the designation of subparagraph (b). The text of
current Rule 7.46E(f)(5)(F)(i)(b) would become the last sentence of
7.46E(f)(5)(F)(i).
    To effect the changes described in the Delay Mechanism to make all
Pegged Orders non-displayed, the Exchange proposes to amend its rules
to provide for Primary Pegged Orders to operate similarly to Market
Pegged Orders and Discretionary Pegged Orders not only in that they
would not be displayed, but also with respect to how they would
function (i) when the PBBO is locked or crossed, (ii) in different
trading sessions, and (iii) in auctions. To effect these changes, the
Exchange proposes to amend its rules as follows:
     Amend Rule 7.31E(h) to move rule text that is currently
applicable to Market Pegged Orders and make it applicable to all Pegged
Orders, as follows (new text italicized):
    (h) Pegged Orders. A Limit Order that does not route with a working
price that is pegged to a dynamic reference price. If the designated
reference price is higher (lower) than the limit price of a Pegged
Order to buy (sell), the working price will be the limit price of the
order. Pegged Orders are not displayed, are ranked Priority 3--Non-
Displayed Orders, and are not eligible to participate in auctions. If
the PBBO is locked or crossed, both an arriving and resting Pegged
Order will wait for a PBBO that is not locked or crossed before the
working price is adjusted and the order becomes eligible to trade. A
Pegged Order will be rejected on arrival, or cancelled when resting, if
there is no PBO (PBB) against which to peg.
     Amend Rule 7.31E(h)(1) describing Market Pegged Orders to
delete, as duplicative of proposed Rule 7.31E(h), the second sentence,
sub-paragraphs (A) and (B) of that Rule, and the designation of
subparagraph (C). The text of current Rule 7.31E(h)(1)(C) would become
the second sentence of Rule 7.31E(h)(1).
     Amend Rule 7.31E(h)(2) defining and describing Primary
Pegged Orders to delete the last two sentences and sub-paragraphs (A)
and (B) of that Rule as no longer applicable.
     Delete reference to Primary Pegged Orders in Rule
7.31E(d)(1)(C) because Primary Pegged Orders would not include a
display quantity and therefore would no longer be able to be combined
with Reserve Orders.
     Make conforming changes to Rule 7.31E(h)(3) defining and
describing Discretionary Pegged Orders by deleting rule text in Rules
7.31E(h)(3)(A) and (E) that would be duplicative of the proposed new
rule text in Rule 7.31E(h), described above.
     Amend Rule 7.18E(c)(4) governing halts in Exchange-listed
securities to replace the term ``Market Pegged Orders'' with ``Pegged
Orders'' because all Pegged Orders would function similarly to Market
Pegged Orders during a halt or pause in an Exchange-listed security.\8\
With this proposed change, all Pegged Orders, including Primary Pegged
Orders and Discretionary Pegged Orders, would be processed in the same
manner as Market Pegged Orders during a halt or pause in trading of an
Exchange-listed security.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule 7.18E(c)(4) to
delete references to ``Retail Orders.'' The Exchange will not offer
a Retail Liquidity Program on its Pillar trading platform, and
therefore references to Retail Orders are moot. See Trading Rules
Filing Notice supra note 5 at 10815.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Replace the term ``Market Pegged Order'' with ``Pegged
Order'' and delete reference to ``Discretionary Pegged Orders'' in Rule
7.34E(c)(1)(A) because all Pegged Orders would be rejected when entered
during the Early Trading Session, regardless of the session designation
on the order.
    In addition to the proposed amendments that the Exchange described
in the Delay Mechanism Filing, the Exchange also proposes to amend its
Pillar rules to replace references to ``NYSE MKT'' with references to
``NYSE American.'' These proposed changes are consistent with the
Exchange's proposed name change to NYSE American LLC (``NYSE
American''), which will become operative upon effectiveness of an
amendment to the Exchange's Certificate of Formation.\9\ Because the
Exchange will implement the Pillar trading platform to coincide with
the effectiveness of the name change to NYSE American, the Exchange
believes that amending the rules governing trading on the Pillar
trading platform to use the term ``NYSE American'' instead of ``NYSE
MKT'' would be appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80283 (March 21,
2017), 82 FR 15244 (March 27, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-14).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To effect the name change, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule
1.1E(k), which defines the term ``Exchange,'' to replace the term
``NYSE MKT'' with ``NYSE American.'' The Exchange also proposes to
rename the order type ``MKT Only Order'' as an ``Non-routable Limit
Order,'' and would amend Rules 7.31E(d)(1)(C), (e)(1), (j)(1), and
7.46E(f)(5)(F)(ii) and (iii) accordingly. The Exchange believes that
the proposed new name for the ``MKT Only Order'' describes the
functionality

associated with this order type because it is not eligible to route.
The Exchange would also amend Rule 7.45E(a) to replace references to
the term ``NYSE MKT LLC'' with the term ``the Exchange.''
    The Exchange also proposes to add to Exchange rules the definition
of ``NYSE American Marketplace,'' which would be defined in Rule
1.1E(e) as ``the electronic securities communications and trading
facility of the Exchange through which orders are processed or are
consolidated for execution and/or display.'' This proposed definition
is based in part on NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(e), which defines the
term ``NYSE Arca Marketplace'' as ``the electronic securities
communications and trading facility designated by the Board of
Directors through which orders of Users are consolidated for execution
and/or display.'' The Exchange proposes a non-substantive difference
from NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(e) not to include reference to the
phrase ``designated by the Board of Directors'' because the Exchange's
Board of Directors does not designate which technology at the Exchange
performs the various functions of the Exchange. The Exchange also
proposes not to use the term ``Users'' as moot. The Exchange further
proposes a difference to add that the term ``NYSE American
Marketplace'' includes the facility where orders are processed, in
addition to the facility where orders are consolidated for execution
and/or display.
    The Exchange believes that adding the term ``NYSE American
Marketplace'' to Exchange rules provides for a term that describes the
Exchange's facilities where orders are processed or are consolidated
for execution and/or display. The Exchange proposes to amend Rule
7.29E(a) and Rule 7.29E(b)(1)(C) to replace the term ``Exchange'' with
``NYSE American Marketplace'' because the Exchange believes that the
term ``NYSE American Marketplace'' in this context is more descriptive.
    The Exchange also proposes to amend Rule 7.29E(b)(1)(A) and (B) to
add the term ``NYSE American Marketplace'' in order to provide
specificity that the Delay Mechanism would be operative for inbound and
outbound communications to and from ETP Holders. Inbound and outbound
communications from ETP Holders, that are processed through the same
electronic securities communications and trading facilities as orders,
such as log on or log out messages, would be subject to the Delay
Mechanism. The Exchange believes that this proposed rule change is
consistent with the rules governing the Delay Mechanism. Specifically,
in the Delay Mechanism Filing, the Exchange described that the Delay
Mechanism functionality is designed to provide for additional latency
under the same circumstances as the intentional latency on Investors
Exchange LLC (``IEX'').\10\ IEX Rule 11.510, upon which Rule 7.29E is
based, specifies that the IEX intentional delay is for inbound and
outbound communications to IEX's ``System.'' IEX defines ``System'' to
mean ``the electronic communications and trading facility designated by
the Board through which securities orders of Members are consolidated
for ranking, execution, and when applicable, routing.'' \11\ The
Exchange believes that its proposed definition of ``NYSE American
Marketplace'' describes facilities that provide similar functionality
as the facilities defined in the IEX term ``System.'' As such, the
Exchange's proposal to add the phrase ``the NYSE American Marketplace''
in Rule 7.29E(b) would make clear that the Delay Mechanism would be
added to all inbound and outbound communications to and from facilities
where orders are processed or are consolidated for execution and/or
display. Accordingly, the Exchange believes that adding the term ``NYSE
American Marketplace'' to Rule 7.29E(b) is consistent with the original
intent of the rule and provides greater specificity and transparency in
Exchange rules regarding how the Delay Mechanism would function,
without any differences.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Delay Mechanism Filing Notice, supra note 6 at 10829.
    \11\ See IEX Rule 1.160(nn).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange proposes to update Exchange rules to reflect
recent changes to Supplementary Material .70 to Rule 67--Equities that
amended the date when certain data would be published by the
Exchange.\12\ The Exchange proposes to amend Commentary .70 to Rule
7.46E to make the same date change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80648 (May 10,
2017), 82 FR 22590 (May 16, 2017) (SR-NYSEMKT-2017-24) (Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    The Exchange will announce the implementation of its transition to
Pillar, and thus when these proposed rule changes would be implemented,
by Trader Update, which the Exchange anticipates will be in the third
quarter of 2017.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\13\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\14\ in particular, because
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the
mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that its proposed rule change to eliminate
ALO Orders, Day ISOs, and related functionality would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system because the proposed deletions are designed to
work in conjunction with the Exchange's Delay Mechanism, as described
in the Delay Mechanism Filing. The proposed changes would also remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system because they would simplify the Exchange's
trading model on Pillar and operate more similarly to IEX, which also
does not offer ALO, Day ISO, or related functionality. The Exchange
further believes that deleting these order types and related
functionality would be consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest because the Exchange has not implemented Pillar and
therefore these order types are not yet available for trading on
Pillar. Deleting these order types before implementation therefore
would not impact any market participants.
    The Exchange believes that its proposed rule change to make all
Pegged Orders be non-displayed is consistent with the purpose of the
Delay Mechanism, which is to allow non-displayed Pegged Orders to
update in real-time based on changes to the PBBO before a new, incoming
order generated in response to the same PBBO change can access the
resting order. By changing Primary Pegged Orders to be non-displayed,
Primary Pegged Orders would be able to be re-priced in real-time as
well. The Exchange therefore believes that this proposed change would
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system because it would allow for Primary
Pegged Orders to benefit from a market structure that includes a Delay

Mechanism. The proposed changes would also remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system because the proposed functionality is based on how IEX operates,
which also does not offer displayed pegging functionality.\15\ In
addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed change is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest because the
Exchange has not implemented its Pillar trading platform and therefore
a displayed Primary Pegged Order is not yet available for trading on
Pillar. Amending Primary Pegged Order functionality before
implementation would therefore not impact any market participants
trading.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See IEX Rule 11.190(a)(3) (defining Pegged Order on IEX).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to change
references from ``NYSE MKT'' to ``NYSE American'' is designed to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system because it would ensure that the Exchange's
rules accurately reflects the name of the Exchange that will be in
effect when it transitions to Pillar, which will make the rule book
easier to navigate.
    The Exchange believes that adding to Exchange rules the term ``NYSE
American Marketplace,'' which is based in part on the term ``NYSE Arca
Marketplace'' in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(k), would remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system because it would add a term designed to
describe with greater specificity the Exchange's facility that
processes or executes and/or displays orders. The Exchange further
believes that amending Rules 7.29E(a) and (b) to add the term ``NYSE
American Marketplace'' would remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by
providing specificity of which communications would be subject to the
Delay Mechanism. The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment to
use this term in Rule 7.29E(b) is a non-substantive change that is
consistent with the original intent of the rule to provide for
additional latency under the same circumstances as IEX. As such, the
proposed change is designed to provide greater specificity and
transparency in Exchange rules regarding how the Delay Mechanism would
function, without any differences.
    Finally, the Exchange believes that the proposed change to
Commentary .70 to Rule 7.46E would remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by
updating Rule 7.46E to reflect recent changes to Supplementary Material
.70 to Rule 67--Equities that amended the date when certain data would
be published by the Exchange.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed changes to ALO,
Day ISO, and Pegged Orders are designed to implement changes previously
described in the Delay Mechanism Filing. As such, these proposed
changes are designed to provide a competitive trading model to IEX by
offering similar order type functionality as IEX in combination with
the Exchange's Delay Mechanism. The Exchange's proposal is therefore
designed to promote competition by offering a choice of exchanges to
those ETP Holders and issuers that prefer to trade or list on an
exchange that offers a delay mechanism and the related order type
offerings. The proposed changes to change the name of the Exchange to
``NYSE American'' and add the term ``NYSE American Marketplace'' are
not designed to address any competitive issues but rather are designed
to provide greater specificity in Exchange rules regarding the name of
the Exchange and a term to define the Exchange's facility that executes
and/or displays orders.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30
days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written
notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a
brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \18\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \19\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. The Exchange
states that waiver of the operative delay would be consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest because it would allow
the proposed rule change to be operative at the same time that the
Exchange begins its transition to Pillar and implements the Delay
Mechanism, which the Exchange anticipates will be on July 24, 2017. The
Exchange states that a waiver will thereby reduce any potential for
confusion of how orders would be processed when the Exchange
transitions to Pillar and implements the Delay Mechanism. The
Commission believes that waiver of the operative delay is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore,
the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \20\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend the rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and

arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2017-38 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2017-38. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEMKT-2017-38, and should
be submitted on or before August 7, 2017.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-14885 Filed 7-14-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 183 (Friday, September 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 44404]
[FR Doc No: 2017-20252]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC17-183-000.
    Applicants: Danskammer Holdings LLC, Danskammer Energy, LLC.
    Description: Joint Application for Approval Under Section 203 of
the Federal Power Act and Request for Expedited Approval of Danskammer
Holdings LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5170.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2173-000.
    Applicants: Cedar Creek II, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revised Market-Based Rate
Tariff to be effective 9/27/2017.
    Filed Date: 7/28/17.
    Accession Number: 20170728-5059.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 9/25/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2495-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Request for Approval to Reprice of Southwest Power
Pool, Inc.
    Filed Date: 9/15/17.
    Accession Number: 20170915-5178.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/6/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-2496-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2017-09-18_SA 3049 NSP-NSP
GIA (J399) to be effective 9/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 9/18/17.
    Accession Number: 20170918-5056.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 10/10/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 18, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-20252 Filed 9-21-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


2015 Ozone Transport FIP Meeting Title: Reliability  -  Good Neighbor Plan Date/Time: June 17, 2022. 10:00 AM  -  10:30 AM Agenda/Meeting Summary:	 This meeting was for PJM to express some thoughts on the current reliability outlook for PJM. They also discussed their perspectives on how reliability measures could interact with a proposed and final Good Neighbor Plan Participants/Affiliations: Name Affiliation Jeb Stenhouse EPA Rona Birnbaum EPA Beth Murray EPA Brian Fisher EPA Dan Schramm EPA David Lifland EPA Tim Profetta EPA Michael Cohen EPA Garrett Powers EPA Craig Glazer PJM Gary Helm PJM Dennis Hough PJM


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 78 (Monday, April 23, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17704-17705]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08373]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Hazardous Materials: Notice of Applications for Special Permits

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: List of applications for special permits.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the procedures governing the application
for, and the processing of, special permits from the Department of
Transportation's Hazardous Material Regulations, notice is hereby given
that the Office of Hazardous Materials Safety has received the
application described herein. Each mode of transportation for which a
particular special permit is requested is indicated by a number in the
``Nature of Application'' portion of the table below as follows: 1--
Motor vehicle, 2--Rail freight, 3--Cargo vessel, 4--Cargo aircraft
only, 5--Passenger-carrying aircraft.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 23, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Record Center, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
20590.
    Comments should refer to the application number and be submitted in
triplicate. If confirmation of receipt of comments is desired, include
a self-addressed stamped postcard showing the special permit number.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ryan Paquet, Director, Office of
Hazardous Materials Approvals and Permits Division, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
Southeast, Washington, DC 20590-0001,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Copies of the applications are available for
inspection in the Records Center, East Building, PHH-30, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue Southeast, Washington DC or at http://regulations.gov.
    This notice of receipt of applications for special permit is
published in accordance with part 107 of the Federal hazardous
materials transportation law (49 U.S.C. 5117(b); 49 CFR 1.53(b)).

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 3, 2018.
Donald Burger,
Chief, General Approvals and Permits Branch.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                        Nature of the
 Application No.     Applicant      Regulation(s)      special permits
                                       affected            thereof
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                          SPECIAL PERMITS DATA
------------------------------------------------------------------------
20618-N.........  National         172.400,         To authorize the
                   Aeronautics      172.300, 173.1.  transportation in
                   and Space                         commerce of
                   Administration.                   explosives
                                                     contained in
                                                     spacecraft by motor
                                                     vehicle. (mode 1)
20619-N.........  Globaltech       ...............  To authorize the
                   Environmental                     manufacture, mark,
                   Corp.                             sale, and use of
                                                     packagings,
                                                     intended to contain
                                                     batteries of mixed
                                                     chemistries, as not
                                                     subject to certain
                                                     hazard
                                                     communication
                                                     requirements. (mode
                                                     1)
20620-N.........  Southern         173.302(a).....  To authorize the
                   States, LLC.                      manufacture, mark,
                                                     sale, and use of
                                                     non-DOT
                                                     specification
                                                     pressure
                                                     receptacles
                                                     containing sulfur
                                                     hexafluoride. (mode
                                                     1, 2, 3, 4)

20621-N.........  Sigma-Aldrich    173.224(c),      To authorize the
                   International    173.225(b),      transportation in
                   GM.              173.56(b).       commerce of certain
                                                     quantities of
                                                     energetic materials
                                                     that have not
                                                     previously been
                                                     classified. (mode
                                                     1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
20622-N.........  Apple Inc......  172.101(j),      To authorize the
                                    173.185(a).      transportation in
                                                     commerce of low
                                                     production lithium
                                                     ion batteries
                                                     exceeding 35 kg net
                                                     weight by cargo-
                                                     only aircraft.
                                                     (mode 4)
20623-N.........  Praxair          172.203(a),      To authorize the
                   Distribution,    180.205(f),      transportation in
                   Inc.             180.205(g),      commerce of DOT 3AA
                                    180.209(a),      cylinders that have
                                    180.209(b),      been requalified
                                    180.209(f),      using ultrasonic
                                    180.213(f).      examination every
                                                     15 years in lieu of
                                                     internal inspection
                                                     and hydrostatic
                                                     testing every 5
                                                     years. (mode 1, 2,
                                                     3, 4, 5)
20624-N.........  Jaguar Land      172.101(j).....  To authorize the
                   Rover North                       transportation in
                   America, LLC.                     commerce of lithium
                                                     ion batteries in
                                                     excess of 35 kg by
                                                     cargo-only
                                                     aircraft. (mode 4)
20625-N.........  LG Chem........  172.101(j).....  To authorize the
                                                     transportation in
                                                     commerce of lithium
                                                     batteries exceeding
                                                     35 kg by cargo-only
                                                     aircraft. (mode 4)
20626-N.........  Aerojet          172.320(a),      To authorize the
                   Rocketdyne,      173.51(a),       transportation in
                   Inc.             173.56(b).       commerce of a one-
                                                     time shipment of
                                                     Class 1 materials
                                                     that have not
                                                     previously been
                                                     approved. (mode 1)
20628-N.........  Stanley Black &  172.704,         To authorize the
                   Decker, Inc.     172.800,         transportation in
                                    172.200.         commerce of lithium
                                                     batteries without
                                                     being subject to
                                                     shipping papers,
                                                     training and
                                                     emergency response
                                                     information
                                                     requirements. (mode
                                                     1)
20629-N.........  Spaceflight,     173.185(e)(3)(i  To authorize the
                   Inc.             ),               transportation in
                                    173.185(e)(3)(   commerce of lithium
                                    ii).             batteries in
                                                     alternative
                                                     packaging. (mode 1)
20630-N.........  Machine &        180.209(a),      To authorize the
                   Welding Supply   180.209(b),      transportation in
                   Company.         180.209(b)(1)(   commerce of certain
                                    iv).             hazardous materials
                                                     in DOT
                                                     Specification 3AL
                                                     cylinders
                                                     manufactured from
                                                     aluminum allow 6061-
                                                     T6 that are
                                                     requalified every
                                                     ten years rather
                                                     than every five
                                                     years using 100%
                                                     ultrasound
                                                     examination. (modes
                                                     1, 2)
20631-N.........  Americase, LLC.  172.400,         To authorize the
                                    172.200,         transportation in
                                    172.300,         commerce of more
                                    173.185(f).      than one damaged/
                                                     defective lithium
                                                     battery in a single
                                                     fiberboard outer
                                                     packaging. (modes
                                                     1, 2, 3)
20632-N.........  Clear View       177.834(h).....  To authorize the
                   Enterprise LLC.                   discharge of
                                                     certain hazardous
                                                     materials for
                                                     portable tanks and
                                                     IBCs without
                                                     unloading the
                                                     packages from the
                                                     vehicle. (mode 1)
20633-N.........  Spaceflight,     173.185(a).....  To authorize the
                   Inc.                              transportation in
                                                     commerce of low
                                                     production lithium
                                                     ion batteries
                                                     contained in
                                                     equipment via cargo-
                                                     only aircraft.
                                                     (mode 4)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2018-08373 Filed 4-20-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4909-60-P