[Federal Register: December 18, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 244)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 76985-76986]
[DOCID:fr18de08-30]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1185; Airspace Docket No. 08-AGL-11]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Columbus, OH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace at Columbus,
OH. Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) at Rickenbacker
International Airport, Columbus, OH. The FAA is taking this action to
enhance the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
aircraft operations at Rickenbacker International Airport.

DATE: 0901 UTC. Comments must be received on or before February 2,
2009.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You
must identify the docket number FAA-2008-1185/Airspace Docket No. 08-
AGL-11, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the
public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any
final disposition in person in the Dockets Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office
(telephone 1-800-647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at
the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76193-0530; telephone: (817)
222-5582.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2008-1185/
Airspace Docket No. 08-AGL-11.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://
www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_
amendments/.
    Additionally, any person may obtain a copy of this notice by
submitting a request to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
Office of Air Traffic Airspace Management, ATA-400, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Communications must identify both docket numbers for this notice.
Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future NPRM's
should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

The Proposal

    This action proposes to amend Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR), Part 71 by amending Class E airspace for SIAPs operations at
Columbus, OH. The area would be depicted on appropriate aeronautical
charts.
    Class E airspace areas are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9S, dated October 3, 2008, and effective October 31, 2008, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document would be published subsequently in
the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA's authority to
issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S.
Code. Subtitle 1, section 106 describes the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency's authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it would amend
controlled airspace at Rickenbacker International Airport, Columbus,
OH.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (Air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS;
AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated October 3, 2008, and effective October 31,
2008, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AGL OH E5 Columbus, OH [Amended]

Columbus, Port Columbus International Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]59'53'' N., long. 82[deg]53'31'' W.)
Columbus, Rickenbacker International Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]48'50'' N., long. 82[deg]55'40'' W.)
Columbus, Ohio State University Airport, OH
    (Lat. 40[deg]04'47'' N., long. 83[deg]04'23'' W.)
Columbus, Bolton Field Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]54'04'' N., long. 83[deg]03'13'' W.)
Columbus, Darby Dan Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]56'31'' N., long. 83[deg]12'18'' W.)
Lancaster, Fairfield County Airport, OH
    (Lat. 39[deg]45'20'' N., long. 82[deg]39'26'' W.)
Don Scott NDB
    (Lat. 40[deg]04'49'' N., long. 83[deg]04'44'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 7-mile radius of Port Columbus International Airport, and
within a 7-mile radius of Rickenbacker International Airport and
within 4 miles either side of the 045[deg] bearing from Rickenbacker
International Airport extending from the 7-mile radius area to 12.5
miles northeast of the airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of the
Ohio State University Airport, and within 3 miles either side of the
091[deg] bearing from the Don Scott NDB extending from the 6.5-mile
radius area to 9.8 miles east of the NDB, and within a 7.4-mile
radius of Bolton Field Airport, and within a 6.4-mile radius of
Fairfield County Airport, and within a 6.5-mile radius of Darby Dan
Airport, excluding that airspace within the London, OH, Class E
airspace area.
* * * * *

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX on December 9, 2008.
Walter L. Tweedy,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E8-30036 Filed 12-17-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 6, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55526-55527]
[FR Doc No: 2018-24241]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC19-20-000.
    Applicants: Beech Ridge Energy LLC, Beech Ridge Energy II LLC,
Beech Ridge Energy II Holdings LLC, Beech Ridge Energy Storage LLC,
Camilla Solar Energy LLC, Buckeye Wind Energy LLC, Grand Ridge Energy
LLC, Grand Ridge Energy II LLC, Grand Ridge Energy III LLC, Grand Ridge
Energy IV LLC, Grand Ridge Energy V LLC, Grand Ridge Energy Storage
LLC, Gratiot County Wind LLC, Gratiot County Wind II LLC, Hardin Wind
Energy LLC, Hardin Wind Energy Holdings LLC, Invenergy TN LLC, Judith
Gap Energy LLC, Pine River Wind Energy LLC, Prairie Breeze Wind Energy
II LLC, Prairie Breeze Wind Energy III LLC, Sheldon Energy LLC, Spring
Canyon Energy LLC, States Edge Wind I LLC, States Edge Wind I Holdings
LLC, Stony Creek Energy LLC, Upstream Wind Energy LLC, Vantage Wind
Energy LLC, Willow Creek Energy LLC, Wolverine Creek Energy LLC,
Wolverine Creek Goshen Interconnection, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act, et al. of Beech Ridge Energy LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5194.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG19-14-000.
    Applicants: Carson Hybrid Energy Storage LLC.
    Description: Carson Hybrid Energy Storage LLC Submits EWG Self-
Certification.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5179.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER19-220-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SCE 2019 TRBAA Update to be
effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5121.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-221-000.
    Applicants: San Diego Gas & Electric Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: TO5 Formula Tariff Filing to
be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-223-000.
    Applicants: MidWest Power.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Application for Market Based
Rate to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-224-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Attachment Y to
Add Competitive Upgrade Re-Eevaluation Process to be effective 12/29/
2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5195.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-225-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Cancellation of Service Agreement
No. 368 to be effective 12/31/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5196.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-226-000.
    Applicants: Wisconsin Public Service Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: WPSC Rate Filing W-1A Tariff
and Rate Schedule No. 87 to be effective 11/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5197.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-227-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Entergy Services, LLC to be
effective 10/30/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5206.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-228-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Service Agreement No. 369--
LCWCD to be effective 10/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5207.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-229-000.
    Applicants: Allegheny Ridge Wind Farm, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Power Compensation
Filing to be effective 12/30/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5031.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-230-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2891R4 AECC and Entergy
Arkansas Attachment AO to be effective 10/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5040.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-231-000.
    Applicants: Dynegy Oakland, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Annual Reliability Must Run
Agreement and Schedule F Informational Filings to be effective 1/1/
2019.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5054.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-232-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2018-10-31_SA 3194 OSER-
Ameren Illinois GIA (J641) to be effective 10/17/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5055.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-233-000.
    Applicants: California Power Exchange Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Rate Filing for Rate Period
34 to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5070.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-234-000.
    Applicants: Grant Wind, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Amended and Restated Co-Tenancy
and Shared Facilities Agreement Filing to be effective 11/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5074.

    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-235-000.
    Applicants: Startrans IO, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: TRBAA 2019 Update to be
effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5084.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-236-000.
    Applicants: Grant Plains Wind, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing: Amended and Restated Co-Tenancy
and Shared Facilities Agreement Filing to be effective 11/1/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5109.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-237-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original ISA SA No. 5225;
Queue No. AB2-059 to be effective 10/3/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5126.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-238-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original ISA SA No. 5222;
Queue No. AB2-169 to be effective 10/2/2018.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5151.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-239-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: FPL Revisions to GTC Rate
Schedule FERC No. 321 to be effective 1/1/2019.
    Filed Date: 10/30/18.
    Accession Number: 20181030-5250.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:

    Docket Numbers: ES19-4-000.
    Applicants: Nantucket Electric Company, The Narragansett Electric
Company, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation, New England Hydro-
Transmission Electric Company, Inc., National Grid Generation LLC.
    Description: Joint Application under Section 204 of the Federal
Power Act for Authorization to Issue Securities of Nantucket Electric
Company, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/31/18.
    Accession Number: 20181031-5203.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 31, 2018.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-24241 Filed 11-5-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45152-45155]
[FR Doc No: 2018-19238]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-84000; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2018-036]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Related
to Fees for Use on Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.

August 30, 2018.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on August 16, 2018, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as one establishing or
changing a member due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange
under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposed rule change effective upon
filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange filed a proposal to amend fee schedule to institute a
new fee for the distribution of data derived from EDGX Top on third-
party websites or other electronic platforms.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's
website at www.markets.cboe.com, at the principal office of the
Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to introduce a new
pricing model to keep pace with an evolving practice. Other exchanges
have pricing programs in place that allow Distributors make ``Derived
Data'' available on a website or other electronic platform that is
branded by a third party, or co-branded by a Distributor and a third
party.\5\ The proposed rule change would implement a new pricing
structure for use of Derived Data--i.e., the EDGX Derived Data White
Label Service Program (the ``Program'')--that would compete with
similar programs currently offered on other equities markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq''), for example,
operates a program whereby it charges Distributors that employ a
hosted display solution to distribute Derived Data taken from its
Nasdaq Basic product. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79228
(November 3, 2016), 81 FR 78890 (November 9, 2016) (SR-NASDAQ-2016-
144).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    ``Derived Data'' is pricing data or other data that (i) is created
in whole or in part from Exchange Data, (ii) is not

an index or financial product, and (iii) cannot be readily
reverse[hyphen]engineered to recreate Exchange Data or used to create
other data that is a reasonable facsimile or substitute for Exchange
Data. The type of Derived Data subject to the proposed fee is taken
from EDGX Top, which is a proprietary data product that provides top of
book quotations and execution information for all equity securities
traded on the Exchange.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Rule 13.8(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Derived Data subject to the proposed fee is made available to
subscribers within a White Label Service which is a type of hosted
display solution in which a Distributor hosts or maintains a website or
platform on behalf of a third-party entity. The service allows
Distributors to make Derived Data available on a platform that is
branded with a third-party brand, or co-branded with a third party and
a Distributor. The Distributor maintains control of the application's
data, entitlements and display.
    The White Label Service may be used for a number of different
purposes, to be determined by the Distributor. Possible uses include
the display of information or data, or the creation of derivative
instruments, such as swaps,\7\ swaptions,\8\ or contracts for
difference.\9\ The specific use of the data will be determined by the
Distributor, as the proposed fee will not depend on the purpose for
placing the Derived Data on a White Label Service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ A swap is a derivative contract in which two parties agree
to exchange financial instruments.
    \8\ A swaption, or swap option, is an option to enter into a
swap at a specified time.
    \9\ A contract for difference is an agreement to exchange the
difference between the current value of an asset and its future
value. If the price increases, the seller pays the buyer the amount
of the increase. If the price decreases, the buyer pays the seller
the amount of the decrease.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As proposed, a Distributor that provides a White Label Service for
Derived Data taken from EDGX Top is liable for the following fees
instead of the fees normally applicable for the distribution of EDGX
Top. First, instead of the regular fee for external distribution,
Distributors would be charged a tiered External Subscriber Fee based on
the number of White Label Service Platforms (i.e., ``External
Subscribers'') that receive Derived Data from the Distributor through a
White Label Service. Specifically, Distributors would be charged a fee
of: (1) $300 per month for each External Subscriber if the Distributor
makes Derived Data available to 1-5 External Subscribers; (2) $250 per
month for each External Subscriber if the Distributor makes Derived
Data available to 6-10 External Subscribers; and (3) $200 per month for
each External Subscriber if the Distributor makes Derived Data
available to 11 or more External Subscribers. The External Subscriber
Fee is non-progressive and, as mentioned above, is based on the number
of External Subscribers that receive Derived Data from the Distributor.
For example, a Distributor providing Derived Data based on EDGX Top to
six External Subscribers would be charged a monthly fee of $1,500
(i.e., 6 External Subscribers x $250 each). Second, the Exchange would
charge a monthly Professional User fee of $4 per month for each
Professional User, which is equivalent to the current Professional User
fee for external distribution of EDGX Top. There would be no monthly
Non-Professional User fee for accessing Derived Data through a White
Label Service.
    The Program is entirely optional, in that it applies only to
Distributors that opt to use Derived Data from EDGX Top to create a
White Label Service, as described herein. It does not impact or raise
the cost of any other Exchange product, nor does it affect the cost of
EDGX Top, except in instances where Derived Data is made available on a
White Label Service. A Distributor that provides a White Label Service
for EDGX Top data that is not Derived Data or distributes Derived Data
through a platform other than a White Label Service would be liable for
the fees normally applicable for the distribution of EDGX Top.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the objectives of Section 6 of the Act,\10\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4),\11\ in particular, as it is
designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees and other charges among its members and other recipients of
Exchange data. The Exchange believes that the proposed rates are
equitable and non-discriminatory in that they apply uniformly to all
recipients of Exchange data. The Exchange believes the proposed fees
are competitive with those charged by other venues and, therefore,
reasonable and equitably allocated to recipients.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 11(A) of the Act \12\ in that it supports (i)
fair competition among brokers and dealers, among exchange markets, and
between exchange markets and markets other than exchange markets and
(ii) the availability to brokers, dealers, and investors of information
with respect to quotations for and transactions in securities.
Furthermore, the proposed rule change is consistent with Rule 603 of
Regulation NMS,\13\ which provides that any national securities
exchange that distributes information with respect to quotations for or
transactions in an NMS stock do so on terms that are not unreasonably
discriminatory. In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted
self-regulatory organizations and broker-dealers increased authority
and flexibility to offer new and unique market data to the public. It
was believed that this authority would expand the amount of data
available to consumers, and also spur innovation and competition for
the provision of market data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78k-1.
    \13\ See 17 CFR 242.603.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange notes that the Commission is not required to undertake
a cost-of-service or rate-making approach. The Exchange believes that,
even if it were possible as a matter of economic theory, cost-based
pricing for non-core market data would be so complicated that it could
not be done practically.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The Exchange believes that cost-based pricing would be
impractical because it would create enormous administrative burdens
for all parties, including the Commission, to cost-regulate a large
number of participants and standardize and analyze extraordinary
amounts of information, accounts, and reports. In addition, it is
impossible to regulate market data prices in isolation from prices
charged by markets for other services that are joint products. Cost-
based rate regulation would also lead to litigation and may distort
incentives, including those to minimize costs and to innovate,
leading to further waste. Under cost-based pricing, the Commission
would be burdened with determining a fair rate of return, and the
industry could experience frequent rate increases based on
escalating expense levels. Even in industries historically subject
to utility regulation, cost-based ratemaking has been discredited.
As such, the Exchange believes that cost-based ratemaking would be
inappropriate for proprietary market data and inconsistent with
Congress's direction that the Commission use its authority to foster
the development of the national market system, and that market
forces will continue to provide appropriate pricing discipline. See
Appendix C to NYSE's comments to the Commission's 2000 Concept
Release on the Regulation of Market Information Fees and Revenues,
which can be found on the Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/s72899/buck1.htm. See also Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 73816 (December 11, 2014), 79 FR 75200
(December 17, 2014) (SR-NYSE-2014-64) (Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change to Establish an
Access Fee for the NYSE Best Quote and Trades Data Feed, Operative
December 1, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the introduction of a fee for the use of
Derived Data on White Label Services is

reasonable because: (i) All proprietary data fees are constrained by
the Exchange's need to compete for order flow; and (ii) proprietary
data fees are subject to market competition from substitute products.
The proposed rule change would provide an alternate fee structure for
providing EDGX Top market data to Distributors that make Derived Data
available to External Subscribers on White Label Services. The Exchange
believes that this will encourage additional Distributors to subscribe
to EDGX Top market data due to the lower cost associated with Derived
Data provided under the Program. Nasdaq already has a similar pricing
structure in place for providing Derived Data through a hosted display
solution.\15\ The Exchange believes that Distributors of EDGX Top
market data would benefit from a similar solution. Furthermore, the
proposed fees are lower than those currently in place on Nasdaq, which
charges a fee of $400 per month for each hosted display solution under
their program,\16\ and may be further lowered for Distributors of EDGX
Top Derived Data based on the number of External Subscribers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ See supra note 5.
    \16\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As proposed, if a Distributor uses a White Label Service to display
Derived Data, the Distributor will be charged a fee that is tiered
based on the number of External Subscribers that are provided access to
that data instead of the higher fee normally charged for external
distribution. The Exchange believes that this fee is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because the Exchange will apply the same fees
to all similarly situated Distributors based on the number of External
Subscribers provided access to Derived Data through a White Label
Service. Furthermore, the proposed fees will only apply to Distributors
that elect to participate in the Program by distributing Derived Data
through a White Label Service. EDGX Top market data is distributed and
purchased on a voluntary basis, in that neither the Exchange nor market
data distributors are required by any rule or regulation to make this
data available. Distributors of EDGX Top are not required to
participate in the proposed Program, which is merely an alternative
option being proposed by the Exchange to potentially lower costs for
market data that is Derived Data. Accordingly, Distributors can
discontinue use at any time and for any reason, including due to an
assessment of the reasonableness of fees charged. Firms have a wide
variety of alternative market data products from which to choose, such
as similar proprietary data products offered by other exchanges and
consolidated data. Moreover, the Exchange is not required to make any
proprietary data products available or to offer any specific pricing
alternatives to any customers.
    In addition to the tiered distribution fee described above, the
Exchange will continue to charge a small fee for Professional Users but
would eliminate Non-Professional User fees for data provided under the
Program. The Exchange believes that it is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to charge a fee for Professional Users but no fee for
Non-Professional Users. Non-Professional Users are already subject to a
heavily discounted fee for EDGX Top market data relative to
Professional Users. Differential fees for Professional and Non-
Professional Users are widely used by the Exchange and other exchanges
for their proprietary market data as this reduces costs for retail
investors and makes market data more broadly available.
    In addition, the fees that are the subject of this rule filing are
constrained by competition. As explained below in the Exchange's
Statement on Burden on Competition, the existence of alternatives to
the proposed program further ensures that the Exchange cannot set
unreasonable fees, or fees that are unreasonably discriminatory, when
subscribers can elect such alternatives. That is, the Exchange competes
with other exchanges and their affiliates that provide similar market
data products. If another exchange or its affiliate were to charge less
for a similar product than the Exchange charges under the proposed fee
structure, prospective subscribers likely would not subscribe to, or
would cease subscribing to, the Program.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The
Exchange's ability to price this data product is constrained by: (i)
Competition among exchanges, other trading platforms, and Trade
Reporting Facilities (``TRF'') that compete with each other in a
variety of dimensions; (ii) the existence of inexpensive real-time
consolidated data and market-specific data and free delayed data; and
(iii) the inherent contestability of the market for proprietary data.
    The Exchange and its market data products are subject to
significant competitive forces and the proposed fees represent
responses to that competition. To start, the Exchange competes
intensely for order flow. It competes with the other national
securities exchanges that currently trade equities, with electronic
communication networks, with quotes posted in FINRA's Alternative
Display Facility, with alternative trading systems, and with securities
firms that primarily trade as principal with their customer order flow.
    The proposed fees apply to data derived from EDGX Top, which is
subject to competition from the Nasdaq, NYSE, and other exchanges that
offer similar products, including exchanges that provide similar
pricing options for Derived Data made available on a White Label
Service. In sum, the availability of a variety of alternative sources
of information imposes significant competitive pressures on Exchange
data products and the Exchange's compelling need to attract order flow
imposes significant competitive pressure on the Exchange to act
equitably, fairly, and reasonably in setting the proposed data product
fees. The proposed data product fees are, in part, responses to that
pressure. The Exchange believes that the proposed fees would reflect an
equitable allocation of its overall costs to users of its facilities.
    In addition, when establishing the proposed fees, the Exchange
considered the competitiveness of the market for proprietary data and
all of the implications of that competition. The Exchange believes that
it has considered all relevant factors and has not considered
irrelevant factors in order to establish fair, reasonable, and not
unreasonably discriminatory fees and an equitable allocation of fees
among all subscribers. The existence of alternatives to EDGX Top,
including existing similar feeds by other exchanges, consolidated data,
and proprietary data from other sources, ensures that the Exchange
cannot set unreasonable fees, or fees that are unreasonably
discriminatory, when subscribers can elect these alternatives or choose
not to purchase a specific proprietary data product if its cost to
purchase is not justified by the returns any particular vendor or
subscriber would achieve through the purchase.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \17\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\18\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2018-036 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2018-036. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of this filing will also be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2018-036 and should be
submitted on or before September 26, 2018.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-19238 Filed 9-4-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: April 13, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 71)]
[Notices]
[Page 19180-19181]
[DOCID:fr13ap06-70]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. ER06-464-000 and ER06-464-001]

The Highlands Energy Group, LLC; Notice of Issuance of Order

April 6, 2006.
    The Highlands Energy Group LLC (Highlands Energy) filed an
application for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying
tariff. The proposed market-based rate tariff provides for the sale of
energy and capacity at market-based rates. Highlands Energy also
requested waiver of various Commission regulations. In particular,
Highlands Energy requested that the Commission grant blanket approval
under 18 CFR part 34 of all future issuances of securities and
assumptions of liability by Highlands Energy.
    On April 5, 2006, pursuant to delegated authority, the Director,
Division of Tariffs and Market Development--West, granted the request
for blanket approval under part 34. The Director's order also stated
that the Commission would publish a separate notice in the Federal
Register establishing a period of time for the filing of protests.
Accordingly, any person desiring to be heard or to protest the blanket
approval of issuances of securities or assumptions of liability by

Highlands Energy should file a motion to intervene or protest with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure. 18 CFR 385.211, 385.214
(2004).
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing motions to
intervene or protest is May 5, 2006.
    Absent a request to be heard in opposition by the deadline above,
Highlands Energy is authorized to issue securities and assume
obligations or liabilities as a guarantor, indorser, surety, or
otherwise in respect of any security of another person; provided that
such issuance or assumption is for some lawful object within the
corporate purposes of Highlands Energy, compatible with the public
interest, and is reasonably necessary or appropriate for such purposes.
    The Commission reserves the right to require a further showing that
neither public nor private interests will be adversely affected by
continued approval of Highlands Energy's issuances of securities or
assumptions of liability.
    Copies of the full text of the Director's Order are available from
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. The Order may also be viewed on the Commission's
Web site at http://www.ferc.gov, using the eLibrary link. Enter the

docket number excluding the last three digits in the docket number
filed to access the document. Comments, protests, and interventions may
be filed electronically via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR
385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
under the ``e-Filing'' link. The Commission strongly encourages
electronic filings.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-5442 Filed 4-12-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT SUBMISSION Please read the instructions before completing this form. For additional forms or assistance in completing this form, contact your agency's Paperwork Clearance Officer. Send two copies of this form, the collection instrument to be reviewed, the Supporting Statement and any additional documentation to: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library, Room 10102, 725 17th Street NW Washington, DC 20503.

1. Agency/ Subagency originating request USEPA/ Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance 2. OMB control number b. G None a. 2060 0171 __ __ __ __

3. Type of information collection ( check one) a. G New collection b. G Revision of a currently approved collection c. X Extension of a currently approved collection d. G Reinstatement, without change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired e. G Reinstatement, with change, of a previously approved collection for which approval has expired f. G Existing collection in use without an OMB control number 4. Type of review requested ( check one) a. X Regular b. G Emergency  Approval requested by: / / c. G Delegated 5. Small entities Will this information collection have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? G Yes X No For b f, note item A2 of Supporting Statement Instructions 6. Requested expiration date a. X Three years from approval date b. G Other Specify: / /___

7. Title NSPS for Magnetic Tape Coating Facilities ( 40 CFR part 60, subpart SSS) ( Renewal)

8. Agency form number( s) ( If applicable) EPA ICR Number 1135.08 9. Keywords Environmental protection, air pollution control, Clean Air Act, magnetic tape manufacturing 10. Abstract This information collection request is used to monitor the compliance with 40 CFR part 60, subpart SSS. Affected facilities will report startup, initial performance test, and retest information. The standard also requires owners of new or modified/ reconstructed magnetic tape manufacturing facilities to make reports and to keep records. Quarterly excess emission reports or seminannual compliance reports are required. The reports and records enable the Administrator to determine that best demonstrated technology is installed and properly operated and maintained.

11. Affected public ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Individuals or households d. Farms b. P Business or other for profit e. Federal Government c. Not for profit institutions f. State, Local or Tribal Government 12. Obligation to respond ( Mark primary with " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. G Voluntary b. G Required to obtain or retain benefits c. P Mandatory 13. Annual reporting and recordkeeping hour burden a. Number of respondents 6 b. Total annual responses 23 1. Percentage of these responses collected electronically 10 % c. Total hours requested 2,017 d. Current OMB inventory 3,891 e. Difference ( 1,874) f. Explanation of difference 1. Program Change 2. Adjustment ( 1,874) 14. Annual reporting and recordkeeping cost burden ( in thousands of dollars) a. Total annualized capital/ startup costs 34 b. Total annual costs ( O& M) 53 c. Total annualized cost requested 87 d. Current OMB inventory 93 e. Difference ( 6) f. Explanation of difference 1. Program change 2. Adjustment ( 6)

15. Purpose of information collection ( Mark Primary With " P" and all others that apply with " X") a. Application for benefits e. Program planning or management b. Program evaluation f. Research c. General purpose statistics g. P Regulatory or compliance d. __ Audit 16. Frequency of recordkeeping or reporting ( check all that apply) a. X Recordkeeping b. Q Third party disclosure c. X Reporting 1. X On occasion 2. Q Weekly 3. Q Monthly 4. X Quarterly 5. X Semi annually 6. Q Annually 7. Q Biannually 8. X Other ( describe) Initial 17. Statistical methods Does this information collection employ statistical methods?

Q Yes X No 18. Agency contact ( person who can best answer questions regarding the content of this submission) Name: Leonard Lazarus Phone: 202 564 6369 OMB 83 I 10/ 95 19. Certification for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions On behalf of this Federal agency, I certify that the collection of information encompassed by this request complies with' 5 CFR 1320.9.

NOTE: The text of 5 CFR 1320.9, and the related provisions of 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3), appear at the end of the instructions. The certification is to be made with reference to those regulatory provisions as set forth in the instructions.

The following is a summary of the topics, regarding the proposed collection of information, that the certification covers:

( a) It is necessary for the proper performance of agency functions;

( b) It avoids unnecessary duplication;

( c) It reduces burden on small entities;

( d) It uses plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology that is understandable to respondents;

( e) Its implementation will be consistent and compatible with current reporting and recordkeeping practices;

( f) It indicates the retention periods for recordkeeping requirements;

( g) It informs respondents of the information called for under 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3):

( i) Why the information is being collected; ( ii) Use of information; ( iii) Burden estimate; ( iv) Nature of response ( voluntary, required for a benefit, or mandatory); ( v) Nature and extent of confidentiality; and ( vi) Need to display currently valid OMB control number;

( h) It was developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected ( see note in Item 19 of the instructions);

( i) It uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology; and ( j) It makes appropriate use of information technology.

If you are unable to certify compliance with any of these provisions, identify the item below and explain the reason in Item 18 of the Supporting Statement.

Signature of Program Official Michael S. Alushin, Director Compliance Assessment and Media Programs Division Office of Compliance Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Date Signature of Senior Official or designee Doreen Sterling, Acting Director Collection Strategies Division Office of Environmental Information Date OMB 83 I 10/ 95 Certification Requirement for Paperwork Reduction Act Submissions 5 CFR 1320.9 reads " As part of the agency submission to OMB of a proposed collection of information, the agency ( through the head of the agency, the Senior Official or their designee) shall certify ( and provide a record supporting such certification) that the proposed collection of information

"( a) is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including that the information to be collected will have practical utility;

"( b) is not unnecessarily duplicative of information otherwise reasonably accessible to the agency;

"( c) reduces to the extent practicable and appropriate the burden on persons who shall provide information to or for the agency, including with respect to small entities, as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act 5 U. S. C. § 601( 6)), the use of such techniques as:

"( 1) establishing differing compliance or reporting requirements or timetables that take into account the resources available to those who are to respond; "( 2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of compliance and reporting requirements; or collection of information , or any part thereof; "( 3) an exemption from coverage of the collection of information, or any part thereof;

"( d) is written using plain, coherent, and unambiguous terminology and is understandable to those who are to respond;

"( e) is to be implemented in ways consistent and compatible, to the maximum extent practicable, with the existing reporting and recordkeeping practices of those who are to respond;

"( f) indicates for each recordkeeping requirement the length of time persons are required to maintain the records specified;

"( g) informs potential respondents of the information called for under § 1320.8( b)( 3); [ see below]

"( h) has been developed by an office that has planned and allocated resources for the efficient and effective management and use of the information to be collected, including the processing of the information in a manner which shall enhance, where appropriate, the utility of the information to agencies and the public;

"( i) uses effective and efficient statistical survey methodology appropriate to the purpose for which the information is to be collected; and "( j) to the maximum extent practicable, uses appropriate information technology to reduce burden and improve data quality, agency efficiency and responsiveness to the public."

NOTE: 5 CFR 1320.8( b)( 3) requires that each collection of information:

"( 3) informs and provides reasonable notice to the potential persons to whom the collection of information is addressed of:

"( i) the reasons the information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( ii) the way such information is planned to be and/ or has been used to further the proper performance of the functions of the agency; "( iii) an estimate, to the extent practicable, of the average burden of the collection ( together with a request that the public direct to the agency any comments concerning the accuracy of this burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing this burden); "( iv) whether responses to the collection of information are voluntary, required to obtain or retain a benefit ( citing authority), or mandatory ( citing authority); "( v) the nature and extent of confidentiality to be provided, if any ( citing authority); and "( vi) the fact that any agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number."

OMB 83 I ( Instructions) 10/ 95


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 16 (Tuesday, January 25, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 3799-3800]
[FR Doc No: 2022-01379]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC22-36-000.
    Applicants: Borderlands Wind, LLC.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Borderlands Wind, LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20220119-5162.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/9/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER12-1740-004.
    Applicants: Rippey Wind Energy LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Rippey Wind
Energy LLC.
    Filed Date: 1/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220118-5293.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/8/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1720-003.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Order 864 ADIT Compliance Filing to
be effective 1/27/2020.
    Filed Date: 1/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220118-5148.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/8/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-837-000.
    Applicants: Puget Sound Energy, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Boeing 449 Amendments to be
effective 12/18/2021.
    Filed Date: 1/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220118-5212.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/8/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-838-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.

    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original WMPA, Service
Agreement No. 6322; Queue No. AG2-394 to be effective 12/21/2021.
    Filed Date: 1/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20220119-5017.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-839-000.
    Applicants: Copper Mountain Solar 5, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Power Compensation
Baseline to be effective 1/20/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20220119-5019.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-840-000.
    Applicants: Battle Mountain SP, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Power Compensation
Baseline to be effective 1/20/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20220119-5022.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-841-000.
    Applicants: Spring Valley Wind LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Reactive Power Compensation
Baseline to be effective 1/20/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20220119-5031.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-842-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to WMPA, SA No.
5666; Queue No. AF1-033 (amend) to be effective 5/28/2020.
    Filed Date: 1/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20220119-5102.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-843-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, LLC,
Entergy New Orleans, LLC, Entergy Services, LLC, Entergy Texas, Inc.,
Entergy Arkansas, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Entergy Louisiana, LLC
submits tariff filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii: EAL-MSS-4 Replacement Tariff
to be effective 8/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 1/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20220119-5137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-844-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2022-01-19 Maximum Import
Capability Enhancements to be effective 3/21/2022.
    Filed Date: 1/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20220119-5149.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/9/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following public
utility holding company filings:

    Docket Numbers: PH22-6-000.
    Applicants: LS Power Development, LLC.
    Description: LS Power Development, LLC submits FERC 65-B Notice of
Change in Fact to Waiver Notification.
    Filed Date: 1/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20220118-5291.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 2/8/22.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: January 19, 2022.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-01379 Filed 1-24-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P