[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 82 (Friday, April 28, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 26349]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08984]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-97365; File No. SR-LTSE-2023-01]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Long-Term Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Establish
Listing Standards Related to Recovery of Erroneously Awarded Incentive-
Based Executive Compensation

April 24, 2023.
    On February 27, 2023, Long-Term Stock Exchange, Inc. (``LTSE'' or
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule to adopt Listing Standards for the recovery of
erroneously awarded compensation, as required by Rule 10D-1 of the Act.
On March 9, 2023, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change, which replaced and superseded the proposed rule change as
originally filed. The proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 1, was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 17,
2023.\3\ The Commission has received no comments on the proposal, as
modified by Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 97123 (March 13,
2023), 88 FR 16487.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is May 1, 2023. The Commission is extending this 45-day time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,\5\ designates June 15, 2023, as the date by which
the Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment No. 1 (File No. SR-LTSE-2023-01).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-08984 Filed 4-27-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 158 (Friday, August 14, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 49596-49600]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15668]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 51

[EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0633; FRL-10011-71-OAR]
RIN 2060-AT80

Revisions to Appendix P to 40 CFR Part 51, Concerning Minimum
Emission Reporting Requirements in SIPs

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending a
regulation that specifies what State Implementation Plans (SIPs) must
require of sources in four categories with respect to continuous
emission monitoring, recording, and reporting. Specifically, the
amendments revise provisions that specify the minimum frequency for
submitting reports of excess emissions that must be included in SIPs.
The minimum frequency is being revised from ``for each calendar
quarter'' to ``twice per year at 6-month intervals.'' The four source
categories covered are: Fossil fuel-fired steam generators; fluid bed
catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerators at petroleum refineries;
sulfuric acid plants; and nitric acid plants. As a result of this
revision, states may choose to revise their SIPs to reflect the revised
minimum frequency specified in our regulations. This action also
corrects an erroneous cross-reference in our regulations.

DATES: This final rule is effective on September 14, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2018-0633. All documents in the docket are
listed in the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information may not be publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available
electronically through https://www.regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further general information on
this rule, contact Ms. Lisa Sutton, U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality Policy Division, State and Local
Programs Group (C539-01), Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone
number<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    Entities potentially affected directly by this action include
states, United States (U.S.) territories, local authorities and
eligible tribes that are currently administering, or may in the future
administer, EPA-approved implementation plans (collectively
``states'').\1\ Entities potentially affected indirectly by this action
are sources categorized as fossil fuel-fired steam generators, fluid
bed catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerators at petroleum
refineries, sulfuric acid plants, or nitric acid plants. For
convenience, the EPA's reference to ``affected sources'' in this
rulemaking generally refers to sources affected by SIP requirements,
i.e., those sources to which a SIP's 40 CFR part 51, appendix P-
specified monitoring requirements actually apply. While all sources
among the appendix P source

categories (when not already excepted in appendix P itself) are
potentially affected by such requirements, it is within the state's
discretion to grant an exemption in its SIP from applicability of the
appendix P-specified monitoring requirements for certain sources. If
you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a
particular entity, consult the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The EPA respects the unique relationship between the U.S.
Government and tribal authorities and acknowledges that tribal
concerns are not interchangeable with state concerns. Under the CAA
and EPA regulations, a tribe may, but is not required to, apply for
eligibility to have a tribal implementation plan (TIP). For
convenience, the EPA refers to either ``states'' or ``air agencies''
in this rulemaking when meaning to refer in general to states, the
District of Columbia, U.S. territories, local air permitting
authorities and eligible tribes that are currently administering, or
may in the future administer, EPA-approved implementation plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?

    This action is being taken by the EPA under the authority of
sections 110(a)(2)(F) and 301(a) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

C. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related
information?

    In addition to being available in the docket, an electronic copy of
this Federal Register document will be posted at https://www.epa.gov/air-quality-implementation-plans/develop-air-quality-sip#guidance.

D. How is this final rulemaking organized?

    The information presented in the preamble is organized as follows:

I. General Information
    A. Does this action apply to me?
    B. What is the Agency's authority for taking this action?
    C. Where can I get a copy of this document and other related
information?
    D. How is this final rulemaking organized?
    E. Judicial Review
II. Amendments to Appendix P
    A. Background and Summary of the Proposed Rule
    B. Summary of Comments on the Proposed Rule and the EPA's
Responses
    C. Final Action
III. Environmental Justice Considerations
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
    A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and
Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
    B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
    D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
    E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
    F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
    G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments
    H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From
Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks
    I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
    J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
    K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
    L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
V. Statutory Authority

E. Judicial Review

    Under CAA section 307(b)(1), judicial review of this nationally
applicable final action is available only by filing a petition for
review in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit (the Court) by October 13, 2020. Under CAA section
307(b)(2), the requirements established by this final rule may not be
challenged separately in any civil or criminal proceedings brought by
the EPA to enforce the requirements.

II. Amendments to Appendix P

A. Background and Summary of the Proposed Rule

    Pursuant to CAA section 110, the EPA established procedural
requirements applicable to all states concerning the preparation,
adoption, and submission of SIPs and SIP revisions. These regulations,
initially promulgated in 1971, comprise 40 CFR part 51, ``Requirements
for Preparation, Adoption, and Submittal of Implementation Plans.''
Like the SIPs themselves, these regulations are periodically revised.
The EPA in 1975 promulgated appendix P to 40 CFR part 51, setting forth
minimum requirements for continuous emission monitoring that each SIP
must require of certain specified categories of existing stationary
sources in order to be approved under the provisions of 40 CFR 51.19
(now 40 CFR 51.214). See 40 FR 46240 (October 6, 1975). With respect to
reporting requirements, appendix P specified under paragraph 4.1 that
the SIP ``shall require owners or operators of facilities required to
install continuous monitoring systems to submit a written report of
excess emissions for each calendar quarter and the nature and cause of
the excess emissions, if known.'' \2\ The reports are required whether
or not excess emissions occurred within the reporting period (see
appendix P, paragraph 4.5). At the time of promulgation in 1975, this
specification in appendix P of quarterly reporting as the minimum
frequency was by design aligned with the quarterly reporting frequency
generally specified for new sources under 40 CFR part 60.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Id. at 46249/1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Over the next many years, the EPA expanded the types of sources to
be regulated pursuant to CAA sections 111 (for New Source Performance
Standards (NSPS)) and 112 (for National Emission Standards for
Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP)), and those later regulations (e.g.,
NSPS under 40 CFR part 60 and NESHAP under 40 CFR parts 61 and 63)
increasingly allowed sources to submit such reports on a less frequent
basis, semiannually or in some cases even annually.
    In finalizing revisions to appendix P, the EPA is resolving a
longstanding inconsistency in reporting requirements for certain
categories of sources between (i) those specified as the minimum for
appendix P source categories in the SIP context (under 40 CFR part 51)
and (ii) those prescribed for similar sources through NSPS (under part
60) or NESHAP (under 40 CFR parts 61 and 63).

B. Summary of Comments on the Proposed Rule and the EPA's Responses

    Through a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) (85 FR 10121,
February 21, 2020), the EPA solicited public comment on proposed
revisions to appendix P to 40 CFR part 51--to change the minimum
frequency of continuous emission monitoring reports specified for SIPs
and to correct an erroneous cross-reference. Also through the NPRM, the
EPA invited the public to comment on information collection activities
in the rule; see section IV.C of this document for a brief summary of
the Information Collection Request (ICR) document that the EPA
prepared. The EPA received three comment submissions on its proposed
revisions to appendix P to 40 CFR part 51. Two submissions were from
state commenters and one submission was from an industry commenter. All
comments concerned the proposed change in appendix P's minimum
reporting frequency specified for SIPs. Among comments received, none
were adverse comments, none were specific to the proposed correction of
the cross-reference in appendix P, and none were specific to the ICR
document. In this section of the final rule, the EPA summarizes and
responds to comments received.
    Comment: All commenters fully supported the proposed change in
reporting frequency. These commenters agreed with the EPA's observation
that the proposed reduced frequency of continuous emission monitor data
reporting (semiannual reporting frequency) is already allowed under
most Federal rules applicable to facilities among the same source

categories as those listed under appendix P. All commenters also agreed
that, as the EPA described in its experience, semiannual reporting
provides sufficiently timely information to ensure compliance and
enable adequate enforcement of applicable requirements while imposing
less burden on the affected industry than would quarterly reporting.
    Response: The EPA acknowledges the commenters' support of the
proposed revision to the minimum reporting frequency specified in
appendix P for SIPs.
    Comment: Two commenters suggested that the appendix P revisions, by
allowing less frequent reporting, would potentially reduce states'
burden associated with receipt and review of continuous emission
monitor reports and would not compromise compliance with or
enforceability of the SIPs' emissions reporting requirements.
    Response: The EPA agrees that the appendix P revisions, by allowing
less frequent reporting, may result in a reduction in burden associated
with a state's receipt and review of reports. This rule will directly
affect burden on a state, however, only so far as the state chooses to
prepare and submit a SIP revision that includes an appendix P-related
provision. The changes to appendix P made in this action do not, by
themselves, revise any SIP provisions. In the case where a state does
choose to revise its SIP to allow less frequent reporting by some or
all sources in the four appendix P source categories, any further
effect on burden, such as that associated with the state's receipt and
review of reports, will depend on factors unique to that state. Those
factors include, e.g., the number of sources in the state among
appendix P source categories and whether the SIP grants certain sources
an exemption from applicability of the appendix P-specified monitoring
requirements (as appendix P allows, such as because the sources are
subject to NSPS requirements). Accordingly, when estimating regulatory
burden associated with this rulemaking, the EPA did not address
potential reduction in states' burden attributable to less frequent
reporting.
    Comment: All commenters asserted that the appendix P revisions
would potentially reduce reporting burden for owners and operators of
affected sources. As a case in point, the industry commenter referred
to NSPS regulations applicable to refineries (40 CFR part 60, subpart
Ja), which apply to one of the appendix P source categories (fluid bed
catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerators at petroleum refineries).
The commenter calculated the approximate cost of semiannual excess
emission reporting to be $4,200 per refinery per year, based on the
EPA's associated burden estimate. The commenter stated that activities
contributing to the reporting burden are relatively independent of the
length of the reporting period and that ``quarterly reporting, where it
is imposed through a SIP program, would roughly double the reporting
burden cost.'' On that basis, the commenter concluded that to allow
semiannual reporting in regulations imposed through a SIP ``has the
potential to significantly reduce the burdens imposed on respondents.''
    Response: The EPA agrees that the revision of reporting frequency
requirements in SIPs may indirectly provide burden reduction for
sources. The EPA notes, however, that this action neither revises any
SIPs nor has any direct effect on industrial sources. Any effect on
burden for potentially affected sources depends on the extent to which
(or even whether) the state in which each source is located decides to
revise its SIP to reflect the revisions to appendix P. Accordingly, in
estimating regulatory burden associated with this rulemaking, the EPA
did not include a quantitative estimate of potential burden reduction
for industrial sources.

C. Final Action

    The EPA is amending appendix P to 40 CFR part 51, which specifies
what SIPs must require of sources among four categories with respect to
continuous emission monitoring, recording, and reporting. Those four
appendix P source categories are: Fossil fuel-fired steam generators;
fluid bed catalytic cracking unit catalyst regenerators at petroleum
refineries; sulfuric acid plants; and nitric acid plants.
    All revisions proposed in the NPRM (85 FR 10121, February 21, 2020)
are being finalized without substantive change in this action. This
action changes the minimum reporting frequency specified in appendix P
for SIPs from ``for each calendar quarter'' to ``twice per year at 6-
month intervals.'' The change aligns the minimum reporting frequency
specified in appendix P for SIPs with the reporting frequency that the
EPA has generally established under more recently updated programs
applicable to sources among the four appendix P source categories, as
the EPA explained in the NPRM. As a result of this change, a state may
in turn choose to revise its SIP's reporting frequency requirement
applicable to appendix P source categories. With this action, the EPA
is achieving its mission of protecting public health and the
environment by assuring that SIPs continue to apply adequate monitoring
requirements. This action does not obligate a state to revise its SIP,
however. The change in minimum reporting frequency specified in
appendix P does not affect any state choosing to retain a more frequent
reporting frequency requirement in its SIP for affected source
categories. Therefore, this action will directly affect burden on a
given state only to the extent that the state voluntarily prepares and
submits a SIP revision that includes an appendix P-related provision.
The EPA has prepared and submitted to OMB an Information Collection
Request (ICR) document to estimate the regulatory burden from
information collection activities associated with this rule. That
burden is attributed to states' preparation and submission of SIP
revisions, a type of reporting burden. The ICR is briefly summarized in
Section IV.C of this document, and a copy of the ICR is available in
the docket for this rulemaking. Aside from the direct burden attributed
to states' preparation and submission of SIP revisions, the EPA
anticipates that the final rule will indirectly reduce reporting-
related burden on certain states and affected sources located in those
states, while continuing to protect public health and the environment.
The EPA has found, as noted in the NPRM at section IV.A, that
semiannual reporting provides sufficiently timely information to ensure
compliance and enable adequate enforcement of applicable requirements
while imposing less burden on the affected industry than would
quarterly reporting. The EPA does not expect the change in minimum
reporting frequency to result in any change in the pollutant emissions
from any of the sources.
    In this action, the EPA is also revising a cross-reference in
appendix P under section 1.0, as explained in the NPRM at section II.A,
so that it correctly refers to the continuous emission monitoring
regulations at 40 CFR 51.214.
    Notwithstanding the revisions to appendix P being promulgated in
this action, a source that is subject to more stringent federally
enforceable excess emission reporting requirements would be required to
comply with the applicable provisions of those rules.

III. Environmental Justice Considerations

    A change in the specified minimum frequency with which affected
sources must submit continuous monitoring system data reports to
states, as a result of the final rule revising appendix P, is not
expected to result in any change in

the pollutant emissions from any of the affected sources. Therefore,
the EPA concludes that this action will not have potential
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority, low-income, or indigenous populations.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

    This action is not a significant regulatory action and was,
therefore, not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.

B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs

    This action is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    The information collection activities in this rule have been
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the PRA. The Information Collection Request (ICR) document that
the EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR number 2590.01. It will be
assigned an OMB control number upon approval by OMB. You can find a
copy of the ICR submitted to OMB in the docket for this rule, and it is
briefly summarized here.
    The regulatory burden under the information collection is
attributed to states' preparation and submission of SIP revisions, a
type of reporting burden. For purposes of estimating the paperwork
burden, the EPA assumes that each of 56 entities, including states, the
District of Columbia, and U.S. territories, would make a single SIP
submission that includes an appendix P-related provision within 3 years
after the effective date of the rule, corresponding to the requested 3-
year collection period. There are no capital costs or operation and
maintenance costs attributed to the rule.
    Respondents/affected entities: All states.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary.
    Estimated number of respondents: 56.
    Frequency of response: One-time.
    Total estimated burden: 3,080 hours per year (or 55 hours per
respondent per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $191,200 per year (or $3,414 per respondent
per year), with no capital cost and no operation and maintenance cost.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the
EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. When OMB
approves this ICR, the Agency will announce that approval in the
Federal Register and publish a technical amendment to 40 CFR part 9 to
display the OMB control number for the approved information collection
activities contained in this final rule.

D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

    I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. In
making this determination, the impact of concern is any significant
adverse economic impact on small entities. Any agency may certify that
a rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, has no
net burden or otherwise has a positive economic effect on the small
entities subject to this rule. This action will not impose any
requirements on small entities. Instead, this action leaves to each
state the choice as to whether to reflect in its SIP a reduction in
minimum reporting frequency specified for certain categories of
stationary sources regulated under the CAA.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

    This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any state,
local, or tribal governments or the private sector.

F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the National Government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. It would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, since no tribe has to develop a TIP under
these regulatory revisions. Furthermore, these regulation revisions do
not affect the relationship or distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. The
CAA and the Tribal Air Rule establish the relationship of the Federal
Government and tribes in developing plans to attain the NAAQS, and
these revisions to the regulations do nothing to modify that
relationship. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.

H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive order. This action is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 because the reduction in minimum reporting
frequency specified for certain categories of sources regulated under
the CAA will have no effect on any obligation to comply with emission
limitations in SIPs, and so it does not concern an environmental health
risk or safety risk.

I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use

    This action is not a ``significant energy action'' because it is
not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution or use of energy. This action merely allows states the
option to reflect in their SIPs a reduction in minimum reporting
frequency specified for certain categories of stationary sources
regulated under the CAA.

J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

    This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations and/or indigenous populations as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    This action merely allows states the option to reflect in their
SIPs a

reduction in minimum reporting frequency specified for certain
categories of stationary sources regulated under the CAA, which will
have no effect on any obligation to comply with emission limitations in
SIPs.

L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

    This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).

VI. Statutory Authority

    The statutory authority for this action is provided by CAA section
101 et seq. (42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 51

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental relations,
Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Nitrogen oxides, Opacity, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur dioxide, Sulfur oxides,
Transportation, Volatile organic compounds.

Andrew Wheeler,
Administrator.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble, title 40, chapter I of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended as follows:

PART 51--REQUIREMENTS FOR PREPARATION, ADOPTION, AND SUBMITTAL OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 51 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 23 U.S.C. 101; 42 U.S.C. 7401-7671q.

Appendix P to Part 51--[Amended]

0
2. In appendix P to part 51:
0
a. Paragraph 1.0 is amended by removing ``40 CFR 51.165(b)'' and adding
in its place ``40 CFR 51.214'';
0
b. Paragraph 4.1 is amended by removing the words ``for each calendar
quarter'' and adding in their place the words ``twice per year at 6-
month intervals'';
0
c. Paragraph 4.6 is amended by removing the words ``in the quarterly
summaries, and'' and adding in their place the words ``as specified in
paragraph 4.1 of this appendix,'';
0
d. Paragraph 5.2.3 is amended by removing the words ``quarterly
summary'' and adding in their place the words ``reports submitted as
specified in paragraph 4.1 of this appendix''; and
0
e. Paragraph 5.3.3 is amended by removing the words ``quarterly
summary'' and replacing them with ``reports submitted as specified in
paragraph 4.1 of this appendix''.

[FR Doc. 2020-15668 Filed 8-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 54 (Monday, March 21, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 15989]
[FR Doc No: 2022-05891]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-2014-0549; FRL-9684-01-OMS]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Application for Reimbursement to Local
Governments for Emergency Response to Hazardous Substance Releases
Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and
Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 123 (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), Application for Reimbursement to
Local Governments for Emergency Response to Hazardous Substance
Releases Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation,
and Liability Act (CERCLA) Section 123 (EPA ICR Number 1425.12, OMB
Control Number 2050-0077) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act.
This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved
through May 31, 2022. Public comments were previously requested via the
Federal Register on November 5, 2021, during a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A
fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated
burden and cost to the public. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and
a person is not required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before April 20,
2022.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
SFUND-2014-0549, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method) or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection
Agency, Mail Code 2821T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in
the public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
    Submit written comments and recommendations to OMB for the proposed
information collection within 30 days of publication of this notice to
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information
collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for
Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brian Schlieger, Office of Emergency
Management, Mail Code 5104A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
564-3128; email address: [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents, which explain in
detail the information that EPA will be collecting, are available in
the public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
http://www.regulations.gov. For further information about the EPA's
public docket, Docket Center services and the current status, please
visit us online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. The telephone number
for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Abstract: The Agency requires applicants for reimbursement under
this program authorized under Section 123 of CERCLA to submit an
application that demonstrates consistency with program eligibility
requirements. This is necessary to ensure proper use of the Superfund.
EPA reviews the information to ensure compliance with all statutory and
program requirements. The applicants are local governments who have
incurred expenses, above and beyond their budgets, for hazardous
substance response. Submission of this information is voluntary and to
the applicant's benefit.
    Form Numbers: 9310-1.
    Respondents/affected entities: Local Governments that apply for
reimbursement under this program.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Voluntary (CERCLA Section 123).
    Estimated number of respondents: 20 (total).
    Frequency of response: Voluntary, on occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 170 hours (per year).
    Total estimated cost: $4,392, which includes no capital or
maintenance and operational costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: The decrease in hours per application is
a result of the form can be filled and submitted electronically.

Courtney Kerwin,
Director, Regulatory Support Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-05891 Filed 3-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: September 17, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 179)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 52828]
[DOCID:fr17se07-14]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2007-0276; FRL-8456-7]

Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, Mojave
Desert Air Quality Management District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Mojave Desert Air
Quality Management District (MDAQMD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This revision concerns volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions from the usage of solvents. We are proposing
to approve a local rule to regulate this emission source under the
Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).

DATES: Any comments on this proposal must arrive by October 17, 2007.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number R09-OAR-2007-
0276, by one of the following methods:
    1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-

line instructions.
    2. E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
    Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at http://www.regulations.gov,

including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through http://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.

http://www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not

know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
    Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at http://www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region

IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents
in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cynthia Allen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4120<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposal addresses the approval of
local MDAQMD Rule 442. In the Rules and Regulations section of this
Federal Register, we are approving this local rule in a direct final
action without prior proposal because we believe this SIP revision is
not controversial. If we receive adverse comments, however, we will
publish a timely withdrawal of the direct final rule and address the
comments in subsequent action based on this proposed rule.
    We do not plan to open a second comment period, so anyone
interested in commenting should do so at this time. If we do not
receive adverse comments, no further activity is planned. For further
information, please see the direct final action.

    Dated: July 25, 2007.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E7-18067 Filed 9-14-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 22, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9429-9432]
[FR Doc No: 2022-03633]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-1006; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00700-T;
Amendment 39-21940; AD 2022-03-22]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019-26-
01, which applied to certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041
airplanes. AD 2019-26-01 required repetitive detailed inspections, and
applicable corrective actions, and provided an optional modification
that terminated the inspections. Since the FAA issued AD 2019-26-01, a
determination was made that a related production modification was not
properly installed on certain airplanes. This AD retains the
requirements of AD 2019-26-01, and, for certain airplanes, adds a one-
time detailed inspection of the modification for proper installation,
and applicable corrective actions if necessary, as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is incorporated
by reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective March 29, 2022.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of March 29,
2022.

ADDRESSES: For the material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this AD,
contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may view this IBR material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-1006.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-1006; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI), any comments
received, and other information. The address for Docket Operations is
U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer,
International Section, Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2021-0141, dated June 15, 2021 (EASA
AD 2021-0141) (also referred to as the MCAI), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes.
    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2019-26-01, Amendment 39-21023 (85 FR 4199,
January 24, 2020) (AD 2019-26-01). AD 2019-26-01 applied to certain
Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041 airplanes. The NPRM published in
the Federal Register on November 18, 2021 (86 FR 64416). The NPRM was
prompted by reports of sealant bead damage caused by rotation of the
attachment fitting bearing assembly of a trimmable horizontal
stabilizer (THS) and a determination that a related production
modification was not properly installed on certain airplanes. The NPRM
proposed to retain the requirements of AD 2019-26-01, and, for certain
airplanes, proposed to add a one-time detailed inspection of the
modification for proper installation, and applicable corrective actions
if necessary, as specified in EASA AD 2021-0141.
    The FAA is issuing this AD to address possible water ingress due to
sealant bead damage, which could result in corrosion damage in the
aluminum corner fitting. This condition, if not addressed, could lead
to detachment and loss of the THS, possibly resulting in loss of
control of the airplane and injury to persons on the ground. See the
MCAI for additional background information.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received a comment from the Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA), who supported the NPRM without change.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the comment
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as
proposed. Except for minor editorial changes, this AD is adopted as
proposed in the NPRM. None of the changes will increase the economic
burden on any operator. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these products.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2021-0141 describes procedures for repetitive detailed
inspections for damage of the fillet sealant and corrosion on aluminum
in the lower and upper corner fittings and bearing assembly attachment
interface at frame (FR) 102, left-hand and right-hand sides, and an
optional modification (application of new corrosion protection in the
THS upper and lower attachment fitting bearing assembly) that would
eliminate the need for the repetitive inspections. EASA AD 2021-0141
also describes procedures for a one-time detailed inspection of the
modification of the lower and upper corner fittings and bearing
assembly attachment interface at FR 102, left-hand and right-hand sides
(Airbus production modification 113102) for discrepancies (including
missing sealant bead, cracks in the sealant bead, and corrosion on the
affected bearing zone) and corrective actions (including, but not
limited to, a check for grease, a check for cracks in the sealant bead,
applying sealant, torqueing the bearing nut, inspecting for corrosion
on the affected bearing zone, applying corrosion preventative compound
and actions to address missing grease and corrosion). This material is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 15 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per      Cost on U.S.
                Action                         Labor cost           Parts cost        product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Retained actions from AD                30 work-hours x $85 per               $0          $2,550         $38,250
 2019[dash]26[dash]01.                   hour = $2,550.
New actions...........................  32 work-hours x $85 per                0           2,720          40,800
                                         hour = $2,720.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data that enables the agency to
provide cost estimates for the corrective actions (including repair)
specified in this AD.

                   Estimated Costs of Optional Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Cost per
              Labor cost                   Parts cost        product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
34 work-hours x $85 per hour = $2,890.              $0           $2,890
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2019-26-01, Amendment 39-21023
(85 FR 4199, January 24, 2020); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

2022-03-22 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-21940; Docket No. FAA-2021-1006;
Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00700-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 29, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2019-26-01, Amendment 39-21023 (85 FR 4199,
January 24, 2020) (AD 2019-26-01).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and -1041
airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2021-0141, dated June 15,
2021 (EASA AD 2021-0141).

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of sealant bead damage caused by
rotation of the attachment fitting bearing assembly of a trimmable
horizontal stabilizer (THS) and a determination that a related
production modification was not properly installed on certain
airplanes. The FAA is issuing this AD to address possible water
ingress due to sealant bead damage, which could result in corrosion
damage in the aluminum corner fitting. This condition, if not
addressed, could lead to detachment and loss of the THS, possibly
resulting in loss of control of the airplane and injury to persons
on the ground.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2021-0141.

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021-0141

    (1) Where EASA AD 2021-0141 refers to February 21, 2018 (the
effective date of EASA AD 2018-0037), this AD requires using
February 28, 2020 (the effective date of FAA AD 2019-26-01).
    (2) Where EASA AD 2021-0141 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (3) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2021-0141 does not apply
to this AD.

(i) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person

identified in paragraph (j) of this AD. Information may be emailed
to: [email protected].
    (i) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (ii) AMOCs approved previously for AD 2019-26-01 are approved as
AMOCs for the corresponding provisions of EASA AD 2021-0141 that are
required by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS's EASA Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the
DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): For any service information
referenced in EASA AD 2021-0141 that contains RC procedures and
tests: Except as required by paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, RC
procedures and tests must be done to comply with this AD; any
procedures or tests that are not identified as RC are recommended.
Those procedures and tests that are not identified as RC may be
deviated from using accepted methods in accordance with the
operator's maintenance or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and tests identified as
RC can be done and the airplane can be put back in an airworthy
condition. Any substitutions or changes to procedures or tests
identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.

(j) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, International Section, Transport Standards
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone
and fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2021-0141,
dated June 15, 2021.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For EASA AD 2021-0141, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on January 28, 2022.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-03633 Filed 2-18-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 220 (Tuesday, November 16, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 70018]
[FR Doc No: 2010-28838]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-1930-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2010-0002]

Iowa; Amendment No. 12 to Notice of a Major Disaster Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for State of Iowa (FEMA-1930-DR), dated July 29, 2010, and related
determinations.

DATES: Effective Date: November 3, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Miller, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW.,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the
Administrator, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, John E. Long,
of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for
this disaster.
    This action terminates the appointment of Thomas A. Hall as Federal
Coordinating Officer for this disaster.

    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

W. Craig Fugate,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2010-28838 Filed 11-15-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-23-P