[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 104 (Tuesday, May 31, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 34387-34388]
[FR Doc No: 2016-12676]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-549, OMB Control No. 3235-0610]

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copy Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736.

Extension:
    Rule 248.30.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget a request for extension of the previously
approved collection of information discussed below.
    Rule 248.30 (17 CFR 248.30) under Regulation S-P, is titled
``Procedures to Safeguard Customer Records and Information; Disposal of
Consumer Report Information.'' Rule 248.30 (the ``safeguard rule'')
requires brokers, dealers, investment companies, and investment
advisers registered with the Commission (``registered investment
advisers'') (collectively ``covered institutions'') to adopt written
policies and procedures for administrative, technical, and physical
safeguards to protect customer records and information. The safeguards
must be reasonably designed to ``insure the security and
confidentiality of customer records and information,'' ``protect
against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security and
integrity'' of those records, and protect against unauthorized access
to or use of those records or information, which ``could result in
substantial harm or inconvenience to any customer.'' The safeguard
rule's requirement that covered institutions' policies and procedures
be documented in writing constitutes a collection of information and
must be maintained on an ongoing basis. This requirement eliminates
uncertainty as to required employee actions to protect customer records
and information and promotes more systematic and organized reviews of
safeguard policies and procedures by institutions. The information
collection also assists the Commission's examination staff in assessing
the existence and adequacy of covered institutions' safeguard policies
and procedures.
    We estimate that as of the end of 2015, there are 4,176 broker-
dealers, 4,041 investment companies, and 11,956 investment advisers
registered with the Commission, for a total of 20,173 covered
institutions. We believe that all of these covered institutions have
already documented their safeguard policies and procedures in writing
and therefore will incur no hourly burdens related to the initial
documentation of policies and procedures.
    Although existing covered institutions would not incur any initial
hourly burden in complying with the safeguards rule, we expect that
newly registered institutions would incur some hourly burdens
associated with documenting their safeguard policies and procedures. We
estimate that approximately 1200 broker-dealers, investment companies,
or investment advisers register with the Commission annually. However,
we also expect that approximately 70% of these newly registered covered
institutions (840) are affiliated with an existing covered institution,
and will rely on an organization-wide set of previously documented
safeguard policies and procedures created by their affiliates. We
estimate that these affiliated newly registered covered institutions
will incur a significantly reduced hourly burden in complying with the
safeguards rule, as they will need only to review their affiliate's
existing

policies and procedures, and identify and adopt the relevant policies
for their business. Therefore, we expect that newly registered covered
institutions with existing affiliates will incur an hourly burden of
approximately 15 hours in identifying and adopting safeguard policies
and procedures for their business, for a total hourly burden for all
affiliated new institutions of 12,600 hours. We expect that half of
this time would be incurred by inside counsel at an hourly rate of
$380, and half would be by a compliance officer at an hourly rate of
$334, for a total cost of $4,498,200.
    Finally, we expect that the 360 newly registered entities that are
not affiliated with an existing institution will incur a significantly
higher hourly burden in reviewing and documenting their safeguard
policies and procedures. We expect that virtually all of the newly
registered covered entities that do not have an affiliate are likely to
be small entities and are likely to have smaller and less complex
operations, with a correspondingly smaller set of safeguard policies
and procedures to document, compared to other larger existing
institutions with multiple affiliates. We estimate that it will take a
typical newly registered unaffiliated institution approximately 60
hours to review, identify, and document their safeguard policies and
procedures, for a total of 21,600 hours for all newly registered
unaffiliated entities. We expect that half of this time would be
incurred by inside counsel at an hourly rate of $380, and half would be
by a compliance officer at an hourly rate of $334, for a total cost of
$7,711,200.
    Therefore, we estimate that the total annual hourly burden
associated with the safeguards rule is 34,200 hours at a total hourly
cost of $12,209,400. We also estimate that all covered institutions
will be respondents each year, for a total of 20,173 respondents.
    These estimates of average burden hours are made solely for the
purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act. An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to a collection of
information unless it displays a currently valid control number. The
safeguard rule does not require the reporting of any information or the
filing of any documents with the Commission. The collection of
information required by the safeguard rule is mandatory.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or send an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: May 24, 2016.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-12676 Filed 5-27-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 147 (Monday, August 1, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 50362-50365]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18009]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2016-0119; FRL-9948-26-Region 9]

Approval of California Air Plan Revisions, Modoc County Air
Pollution Control District, Permit Programs

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action to approve revisions to the Modoc County Air Pollution
Control District (MCAPCD) portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern MCAPCD's
administrative and procedural requirements to obtain preconstruction
permits that regulate emission sources under the Clean Air Act as
amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act). We are approving local rules under
the CAA.

DATES: This rule is effective on September 30, 2016 without further
notice, unless the EPA receives adverse comments by August 31, 2016. If
we receive such comments, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public that this direct final rule will
not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2016-0119 at http://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments

cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ya-Ting (Sheila) Tsai, EPA Region IX,
(415) 972-3328<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us,''
and ``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What rules did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these rules?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?
    B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What rules did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the rules under MCAPCD Regulation II, ``Permit
System'' addressed by this action with the dates that they were adopted
by the local air agency and submitted by the California Air Resources
Board (CARB).

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Adoption or
                  Rule No.                                Rule title              amendment date  Submittal date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.3........................................  Transfers..........................       1/15/1989      12/31/1990
2.5........................................  Expiration of Applications.........       1/15/1989      12/31/1990
2.7........................................  Conditional Approval...............       1/15/1989      12/31/1990
2.10.......................................  Further Information................       1/15/1989      12/31/1990
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On February 28, 1991, the EPA determined that the submittal for the
MCAPCD rules listed in Table 1 met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR
part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review.

B. Are there other versions of these rules?

    EPA approved the rules listed in Table 2 into the MCAPCD portion of
the California SIP on the dates listed. When the rules listed in Table
1 are approved by EPA, those rules will take the place of the existing
SIP approved rules listed in Table 2.

                                           Table 2--SIP Approved Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Federal
                  Rule No.                                Rule title               SIP approval      Register
                                                                                date          citation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.3........................................  Transfer...........................      09/22/1972     37 FR 19812
2.5........................................  Cancellation of Applications.......      09/22/1972     37 FR 19812
2.7 *......................................  Provision of Sampling and Testing        09/22/1972     37 FR 19812
                                              Facilities.
2.9 *......................................  Conditional Approval...............      09/22/1972     37 FR 19812
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Note: SIP approved Rule 2.7--Provision of Sampling and Testing Facilities will be replaced by newly submitted
  Rule 2.10 Further Information. SIP approved Rule 2.9--Conditional Approval will be replaced by submitted Rule
  2.7--Conditional Approval.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted rule revisions?

    Section 110(a) of the CAA requires States to submit regulations
that will assure attainment and maintenance of the National Ambient
Quality Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). These rules were developed as
part of the local agency's general programmatic requirement to
implement the requirement commonly referred to as the minor or general
New Source Review (NSR) program. The revisions contained in the
submitted rules listed in Table 1 are mostly administrative in nature.
Rule 2.3 prohibits the transfer of an Authority to Construct or Permit
to Operate without written approval. Rule 2.5 provides the timeline for
an Authority to Construct or an application for a Permit to Operate to
expire and/or be extended. Rule 2.7 is renumbered from Rule 2.9 and
provides additional enforceability by clarifying that equipment cannot
be operated contrary to permit conditions specified in the permit. Rule
2.10 is a new rule that allows MCAPCD to require data, sampling,
testing, and monitoring to determine a stationary source's emissions.
There are no substantive relaxations to these rules.
    The TSD, which is available in the docket for today's rulemaking,
has more information about these rules.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the rules?

    SIP rules must be enforceable (see CAA section 110(a)(2)), must not
interfere with applicable requirements concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress or other CAA requirements (see CAA section
110(l)), and must not modify certain SIP control requirements in
nonattainment areas without ensuring equivalent or greater emissions
reductions (see CAA section 193). The submitted rules are revisions

to existing SIP approved general NSR permit program requirements under
40 CFR 51.160-51.164. The revisions are primarily administrative in
nature (reformatting, providing additional clarity and enforceability).

B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?

    We believe these rules are consistent with the relevant policy and
guidance regarding enforceability and SIP relaxations. These changes
are mostly administrative in nature and their approval will not
interfere with any applicable requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress, or any other CAA application requirement.
    The TSD, which is available in the docket for today's rulemaking,
has more information on our evaluation.

C. Public Comment and Final Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully
approving the submitted rules because we believe they fulfill all
relevant requirements. We do not think anyone will object to this
approval, so we are finalizing it without proposing it in advance.
However, in the Proposed Rules section of this Federal Register, we are
simultaneously proposing approval of the same submitted rules. If we
receive adverse comments by August 31, 2016, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to notify the public that the direct
final approval will not take effect and we will address the comments in
a subsequent final action based on the proposal. If we do not receive
timely adverse comments, the direct final approval will be effective
without further notice on September 30, 2016. This action will
incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable SIP.
    Please note that if the EPA receives adverse comment on an
amendment, paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may
be severed from the remainder of the rule, the EPA may adopt as final
those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse
comment.

III. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
MCAPCD rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
available electronically through www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region IX (AIR-3), 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by September 30, 2016. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. Parties with objections to this direct final
rule are encouraged to file a comment in response to the parallel
notice of proposed rulemaking for this action published in the Proposed
Rules section of today's Federal Register, rather than file an
immediate petition for judicial review of this direct final rule, so
that the EPA can withdraw this direct final rule and address the
comment in the proposed rulemaking. This action may not be challenged
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 15, 2016.
Alexis Strauss,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
    Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(6)(xi)(D), and
(c)(182)(i)(F)(5), (6), (7), and (8) to read as follows:

Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (6) * * *
    (xi) * * *
    (D) Previously approved September 22, 1972 in paragraph (c)(6) of
this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph
(c)(182)(i)(F)(5), (6), (7), and (8), Rule 2.3 ``Transfer,'' Rule 2.5
``Cancellation of Application,'' Rule 2.7 ``Provision of Sampling and
Testing Facilities,'' and Rule 2.9 ``Conditional Approval''.
* * * * *
    (182) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (F) * * *
    (5) Regulation II, ``Permit System,'' Rule 2.3 ``Transfers''
amended on January 15, 1989.
    (6) Regulation II, ``Permit System,'' Rule 2.5 ``Expiration of
Applications'' amended on January 15, 1989.
    (7) Regulation II, ``Permit System,'' Rule 2.7 ``Conditional
Approval'' amended on January 15, 1989.
    (8) Regulation II, ``Permit System,'' Rule 2.10 ``Further
Information'' amended on January 15, 1989.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2016-18009 Filed 7-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 206 (Wednesday, October 26, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64784-64785]
[FR Doc No: 2022-23290]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following Complaints
and Compliance filings in EL Dockets:

    Docket Numbers: EL23-6-000.
    Applicants: Hollow Road Solar, LLC v. Old Dominion Electric
Cooperative.
    Description: Petition for Enforcement.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5070.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2437-017.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Second Supplement to December 28, 2021 Triennial
Market Power Analysis for Southwest Region of Arizona Public Service
Company.
    Filed Date: 10/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20221019-5158.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-3377-009; ER11-3376-008; ER11-3378-009.
    Applicants: South Hurlburt Wind, LLC, North Hurlburt Wind, LLC,
Horseshoe Bend Wind, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of Horseshoe
Bend Wind, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5053.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER12-922-005; ER22-1272-001.
    Applicants: Phillips 66 Company, Phillips 66 Energy Trading LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of Phillips 66 Company, et
al.
    Filed Date: 10/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20221019-5160.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-1639-000.
    Applicants: Constellation Mystic Power, LLC.
    Description: Formal Challenge of the New England States Committee
on Electricity.
    Filed Date: 10/17/22.
    Accession Number: 20221017-5096.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/16/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-467-008.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: NYISO Amendment to Compliance re:
Technical Corrections to eTariff Records to be effective 8/26/2020.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5015.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER22-2736-000.
    Applicants: Moss Landing Energy Storage 3, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to August 29, 2022, Application for Market-
Based Rate Authorization to Moss Landing Energy Storage 3, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/18/22.
    Accession Number: 20221018-5166.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 10/28/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-137-000.
    Applicants: ZEP Grand Prairie Wind, LLC.
    Description: Request for Prospective Tariff Waiver, et al. of ZEP
Grand Prairie Wind, LLC.
    Filed Date: 10/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20221019-5093.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-140-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to ISA No. 2382,
Queue No. None, Essex (consent) to be effective 11/20/2012.
    Filed Date: 10/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20221019-5123.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-141-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Original NSA, SA No. 6670;
Queue No. AC1-033 to be effective 9/20/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5046.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-142-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2022-10-20_SA 3920 Duke-IN
Solar GIA (J1234 J1235) to be effective 12/20/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5058.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-143-000.
    Applicants: Bruce Power Inc.
    Description: Compliance filing: Request for Category 1 Seller
Status in the Central Region & Revised MBR Tariff to be effective 10/
21/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5091.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-144-000.
    Applicants: New England Power Company.
    Description: New England Power Company submits Notice of
Cancellation of the Firm Local Generation Deliverability Service
Agreement with Pawtucket Power Associates Limited Partnership.

    Filed Date: 10/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20221019-5164.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/9/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-145-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to ISA No. 3669,
Y3-051, Z1-058 Linden (amend) to be effective 8/29/2016.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-146-000.
    Applicants: Northern Indiana Public Service Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Supplement to WVPA IA for
New Delivery Point to be effective 11/23/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5135.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-147-000.
    Applicants: Resurgence Solar I, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Resurgence Solar I, LLC
Application for Market-Based Rate Authorization to be effective 12/20/
2022.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-148-000.
    Applicants: Resurgence Solar II, LLC.
    Description: Baseline eTariff Filing: Resurgence Solar II, LLC
Application for Market-Based Rate Authorization to be effective 12/20/
2022.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5141.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-149-000.
    Applicants: Northern Indiana Public Service Company LLC.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Supplement to WVPA IA for
New Delivery Point to be effective 11/30/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5142.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Docket Numbers: ER23-150-000.
    Applicants: Southern Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Request for Authorization of
Affiliate Transactions to be effective 12/31/2022.
    Filed Date: 10/20/22.
    Accession Number: 20221020-5144.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/10/22.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following PURPA
210(m)(3) filings:

    Docket Numbers: QM23-1-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, LLC, Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy
Mississippi, LLC, Entergy New Orleans, LLC, Entergy Texas, Inc.,
Entergy Services, LLC.
    Description: Application of Entergy Arkansas, LLC, et al. to
Terminate Its Mandatory Purchase Obligation under the Public Utility
Regulatory Policies Act of 1978.
    Filed Date: 10/19/22.
    Accession Number: 20221019-5156.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/16/22.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: October 20, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-23290 Filed 10-25-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 5 (Tuesday, January 8, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 1210]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00118]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of Membership of Performance Review Board for Senior
Executives (PRB)

    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby provides notice of
the membership of its Performance Review Board (PRB) for the
Commission's Senior Executive Service (SES) members. The function of
this board is to make recommendations relating to the performance of
senior executives in the Commission. This action is undertaken in
accordance with Title 5, U.S.C., Section 4314(c)(4).
    The Commission's PRB will remove the following member:

Charles H. Schneider

    The Commission's PRB will add the following member:

Anton C. Porter, PRB Chairman

    Dated: January 2, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-00118 Filed 1-7-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 205 (Wednesday, October 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59385-59386]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23394]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[CERCLA 01-2021-0082; FRL-9159-01-R1]

Proposed CERCLA Cost Recovery and Work Administrative Settlement:
Wampus Milford Associates Site, Milford, Connecticut

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement; request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of a proposed cost recovery and work
administrative settlement concerning

the Wampus Milford Associates Site (Site), located in Milford, New
Haven County, Connecticut, with the Settling Party, FCI USA LLC. The
proposed settlement requires the Settling Party to conduct a removal
action estimated to cost approximately $1.2 million at the Wood Block
Area of the Site and pay all of EPA's future response costs in
overseeing the removal work. The parameters of the removal action
include, but are not limited to, excavation and disposal of soil/
woodblock debris contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In
exchange, EPA will provide the Settling Party with a covenant not to
sue for the work, future response costs related to the work, and EPA's
past response costs, which are approximately $105,800. For 30 days
following the date of publication of this notice, the Agency will
receive written comments relating to the settlement for cost recovery
and response work.

DATES: Comments must be submitted by November 26, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be addressed to RuthAnn Sherman, Senior
Enforcement Counsel, Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (04-2), Boston, MA
02109-3912,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected], and should
reference the Wampus Milford Associates Site, U.S. EPA Docket No:
CERCLA 01-2021-0082.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A copy of the proposed settlement may
be obtained from Stacy Greendlinger, Superfund and Emergency Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, 5 Post Office
Square, Suite 100 (02-2), Boston, MA 02109-3912, telephone number:
(617) 918-1403, email address: [email protected]. Direct
technical questions to Stacy Greendlinger and legal questions to
RuthAnn Sherman, Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region I, 5 Post Office Square, Suite 100 (04-2),
Boston, MA 02109-3912, telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>, email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This proposed cost recovery and work
administrative settlement concerning the Wampus Milford Associates
Site, located in Milford, New Haven County, Connecticut, is made in
accordance with Section 122(h)(l) of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). EPA covenants not
to sue or take administrative action against the FCI USA LLC, pursuant
to Section 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), for the Work, Future
Response Costs, and Past Response Costs, as defined in the settlement
agreement. In exchange, the Settling Party agrees to conduct a removal
action estimated to cost approximately $1.2 million, and pay all of
EPA's future response costs related to overseeing the work. The Agency
will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its
consent to this cost recovery settlement if comments received disclose
facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The Agency's response to any
comments received will be available for public inspection at the
Environmental Protection Agency--Region I, 5 Post Office Square, Suite
100, Boston, MA 02109-3912. The Effective Date of the Agreement is the
date upon which EPA notifies FCI USA LLC that the public comment period
has closed and that such comments, if any, do not require that EPA
modify or withdraw from the Agreement. The proposed settlement has been
approved by the Environmental and Natural Resources Division of the
United States Department of Justice, subject to any comments received
and EPA's response thereto.

Bryan Olson,
Director, Superfund and Emergency Management Division.
[FR Doc. 2021-23394 Filed 10-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 230 (Friday, December 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 83936]
[FR Doc No: 2023-26388]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER24-475-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: NPC--Amendments to
Attachments N and P to be effective 1/21/2024.
    Filed Date: 11/22/23.
    Accession Number: 20231122-5171.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/13/23.

    Docket Numbers: ER24-476-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: ISO New England Inc. submits confidential and public
versions of its informational filing for Forward Capacity Auction 18,
which is associated with the 2027-2028 Capacity Commitment Period.
    Filed Date: 11/22/23.
    Accession Number: 20231122-5206.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 12/7/23.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211,
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners,
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is
encouraged to contact OPP at<PHONE_NUMBER> or [email protected].

    Dated: November 24, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-26388 Filed 11-30-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


                       UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

        Issued by the Department of Transportation on November 12, 2002

   NOTICE OF ACTION TAKEN -- DOCKET OST-97-3124

________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________

This serves as notice to the public of the action described below, taken
by the Department official indicated (no additional confirming order
will be issued in this matter).

Application of DELTA AIR LINES, INC filed  9/18/02 to:

XX  Renew and amend, for two years, exemption under 49 U.S.C. 40109 to
provide the following service:

Scheduled foreign air transportation of persons, property, and mail
between any point in the United States and any point in Peru, via any
intermediate point to any beyond point.  Delta also requests authority
to combine service on this route with all other Delta services
authorized by existing certificates and exemptions.

Applicant rep: Robert E. Cohn,<PHONE_NUMBER>    DOT Analyst:  Keith A.
Glatz,<PHONE_NUMBER>

D I S P O S I T I O N

XX  Granted (subject to conditions, see below)

The above action was effective when taken: November 12, 2002 through
November 12, 2004 or until 90 days after final action on Delta’s
certificate application in Docket OST-99-6246, or whichever occurs
earlier.

Action taken by:   Paul L. Gretch, Director

		    Office of International Aviation

XX  The authority granted is consistent with the Multilateral Agreement
on the Liberalization of International Air Transportation to which the
United States and Peru are parties.

Except to the extent exempted or waived, this authority is subject to
the terms, conditions, and limitations indicated:  XX Holder’s
certificates of public convenience and necessity

	   XX  Standard exemption conditions (attached)

_____________________

Conditions:  The route integration authority granted is subject to the
condition that any service provided under this exemption shall be
consistent with all applicable agreements between the United States and
the foreign countries involved.  Furthermore, (a) nothing in the award
of the route integration authority requested should be construed as
conferring upon Delta rights (including fifth-freedom intermediate
and/or beyond rights) to serve markets where U.S. carrier entry is
limited unless Delta notifies the Department of its intent to serve such
a market and unless and until the Department has completed any necessary
carrier selection procedures to determine which carrier(s) should be
authorized to exercise such rights; and (b) should there be a request by
any carrier to use the limited-entry route rights that are included in
Delta’s authority by virtue of the route integration exemption granted
here, but that are not then being used by Delta, the holding of such
authority by route integration will not be considered as providing any
preference to Delta in a competitive carrier selection proceeding to
determine which carrier(s) should be entitled to use the authority at
issue.

________________________________________________________________________
______________

On the basis of data officially noticeable under Rule 24(g) of the
Department's regulations, we found the applicant qualified to provide
the services authorized.

Under authority assigned by the Department in its regulations, 14 CFR
Part 385, we found that (1) our

action was consistent with Department policy; (2) grant of the exemption
authority was consistent with the public interest; and (3) grant of the
authority would not constitute a major regulatory action under the
Energy Policy and Conservation Act of 1975.  To the extent not granted,
we denied all requests in the referenced Docket.  We may amend, modify,
or revoke the authority granted in this Notice at any time without
hearing at our discretion.

Persons entitled to petition the Department for review of the action set
forth in this Notice under the Department’s regulations, 14 CFR
§385.30, may file their petitions within seven (7) days after the date
of issuance of this Notice.  This action was effective when taken, and
the filing of a petition for review will not alter such effectiveness.

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide
Web at:

http://dms.dot.gov//reports/reports_aviation.asp

APPENDIX

U.S. CARRIER

Standard Exemption Conditions

In the conduct of operations authorized by the attached notice, the
applicant(s) shall:

(1)  Hold at all times effective operating authority from the government
of each country served;

(2)  Comply with applicable requirements concerning oversales contained
in 14 CFR 250 (for scheduled operations, if authorized);

(3)  Comply with the requirements for reporting data contained in 14 CFR
241;

(4)  Comply with requirements for minimum insurance coverage, and for
certifying that coverage to the Department, contained in 14 CFR 205;

(5)  Except as specifically exempted or otherwise provided for in a
Department Order, comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 203, concerning
waiver of Warsaw Convention liability limits and defenses;

(6)  Comply with the applicable requirements of the Federal Aviation
Administration Regulations and with all applicable U.S. Government
requirements concerning security; and

(7)  Comply with such other reasonable terms, conditions, and
limitations required by the public interest as may be prescribed by the
Department of Transportation, with all applicable orders and regulations
of other U.S. agencies and courts, and with all applicable laws of the
United States.

The authority granted shall be effective only during the period when the
holder is in compliance with the conditions imposed above.

10/2002

 Delta requests to broaden its existing Atlanta-Lima exemption (See
Notice of Action Taken November 22, 2002 in this Docket.)

 To assure compliance with all applicable U.S. Government requirements
concerning security, the holder should, before commencing any new
service (including charter flights) to or from a foreign airport, inform
its Principal Security Inspector of its plans.


[Federal Register: February 24, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 36)]
[Notices]
[Page 8425-8426]
[DOCID:fr24fe10-160]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activity Seeking OMB Approval

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA invites public comments about our intention to request
the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) revision of a current
information collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day
comment period soliciting comments on the following collection of
information was published on November 13, 2009, vol. 74, no. 218, page
58677. The FAA Office of the Associate Administrator for Commercial
Space Transportation (AST) conducts this survey in order to obtain
industry input on customer service standards which have been developed
and distributed to industry customers.

DATES: Please submit comments by March 26, 2010.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carla Mauney at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)

    Title: Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation
Customer Service Survey.
    Type of Request: Extension without change of a currently approved
collection.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0611.
    Form(s): There are no FAA forms associated with this collection.
    Affected Public: An estimated 50 Respondents.
    Frequency: This information is collected on occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: Approximately 1 hour per
response.
    Estimated Annual Burden Hours: An estimated 50 hours annually.
    Abstract: The FAA Office of the Associate Administrator for
Commercial Space Transportation (AST) conducts this survey in order to
obtain industry input on customer service standards which have been
developed and distributed to industry customers. This is a requirement
of the White House NPR Customer Service Initiative. AST collects and
analyzes the data for results.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments on
the proposed information collection to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget. Comments should be
addressed

to the attention of the Desk Officer, Department of Transportation/FAA,
and sent via electronic mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or faxed
to<PHONE_NUMBER>, or mailed to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget, Docket Library,
Room 10102, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.
    Comments are invited on: Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Department, including whether the information will have practical
utility; the accuracy of the Department's estimates of the burden of
the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 18, 2010.
Carla Mauney,
FAA Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises Business
Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2010-3704 Filed 2-23-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 27 (Wednesday, February 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 7521]
[FR Doc No: 2022-02665]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-94140; File No. SR-LTSE-2021-08]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Long-Term Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on a
Proposed Rule Change To Modify and Expand the Package of Products and
Services Provided to Companies and Clarify Existing Practice Under Rule
14.602

February 3, 2022.
    On December 2, 2021, Long-Term Stock Exchange, Inc. (``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule to modify
and expand the package of products and services provided to Companies
and clarify existing practice under Exchange Rule 14.602 with respect
to providing Company-specific web pages on the Exchange's website in
connection with listing on the Exchange. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on December 21, 2021.\3\
The Commission has not received any comment letters on the proposed
rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 93787 (December 15,
2021), 86 FR 72296 (December 21, 2021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \4\ provides that, within 45 days of
the publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is February 4, 2022.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission is extending the 45-day time period for Commission
action on the proposed rule change. The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on
the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
proposed rule change. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\5\ the Commission designates March 21, 2022, as the date by which
the Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule
change (File No. SR-LTSE-2021-08).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-02665 Filed 2-8-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P