[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 62234]
[FR Doc No: 2021-24423]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[SEC File No. 270-034, OMB Control No. 3235-0034]

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension:
    Rule 17f-2(a)

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (``PRA'') (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the existing
collection of information provided for in Rule 17f-2(a) (17 CFR
240.17f-2(a)), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a
et seq.). The Commission plans to submit this existing collection of
information to the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') for
extension and approval.
    Rule 17f-2(a) (Fingerprinting Requirements for Securities
Professionals) requires that securities professionals be fingerprinted.
This requirement serves to identify security-risk personnel, to allow
an employer to make fully informed employment decisions, and to deter
possible wrongdoers from seeking employment in the securities industry.
Partners, directors, officers, and employees of exchanges, brokers,
dealers, transfer agents, and clearing agencies are included.
    The Commission staff estimates that approximately 4,480 respondents
will submit an aggregate total of 289,780 new fingerprint cards each
year or approximately 65 fingerprint cards per year per registrant. The
staff estimates that the average number of hours necessary to complete
a fingerprint card is one-half hour. Thus, the total estimated annual
burden is 144,890 hours for all respondents (289,780 times one-half
hour). The average internal cost of compliance per hour is
approximately $283. Therefore, the total estimated annual internal cost
of compliance for all respondents is $41,003,870 (144,890 times $283).
    This rule does not involve the collection of confidential
information.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the Commission, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the Commission's
estimates of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of
information on respondents, including through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of information technology.
Consideration will be given to comments and suggestions submitted in
writing within 60 days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information under the PRA unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control number.
    Please direct your written comments to: David Bottom, Director/
Chief Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o John
R. Pezzullo, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, or send an email
to: [email protected].

    Dated: November 3, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-24423 Filed 11-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 92 (Friday, May 14, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26378-26379]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10209]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0055; Airspace Docket No. 21-ASW-4]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of Class E Airspace; Hebbronville, TX

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends the Class E airspace extending upward from
700 feet above the surface at Jim Hogg County Airport, Hebbronville,
TX. This action is the result of an airspace review due to the
decommissioning of the Hebbronville non-directional beacon (NDB).

DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, August 12, 2021. The Director of the Federal
Register approves this incorporation by reference action under 1 CFR
part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and
publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the
availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101
Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it amends the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above
the surface at Jim Hogg County Airport, Hebbronville, TX, to support
instrument flight rule operations at this airport.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal
Register (86 FR 10891; February 23, 2021) for Docket No. FAA-2021-0055
to amend the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the
surface at Jim Hogg County Airport,

Hebbronville, TX. Interested parties were invited to participate in
this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal
to the FAA. No comments were received.
    Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of
FAA Order 7400.11E, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15,
2020, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E
airspace designations listed in this document will be published
subsequently in the Order.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15,
2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    This amendment to 14 CFR part 71 amends the Class E airspace
extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Jim Hogg County
Airport, Hebbronville, TX, by removing the Hebbronville NDB and
associated extension from the airspace legal description; and removes
the cities associated with the airports to comply with changes to FAA
Order 7400.2M, Procedures for Handling Airspace Matters.
    This action is the result of an airspace review due to the
decommissioning of the Hebbronville NDB which provided navigation
information for the instrument procedures at this airport.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current, is
non-controversial and unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action''
under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26,
1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter
that only affects air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, does not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this action qualifies for categorical
exclusion under the National Environmental Policy Act in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures,'' paragraph 5-6.5.a. This airspace action is not expected
to cause any potentially significant environmental impacts, and no
extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant preparation of an
environmental assessment.

Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth.

* * * * *

ASW TX E5 Hebbronville, TX [Amended]

Jim Hogg County Airport, TX
    (Lat. 27[deg]20'58'' N, long. 98[deg]44'13'' W)
O.S. Wyatt Airport, TX
    (Lat. 27[deg]25'18'' N, long. 98[deg]36'16'' W)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.5-mile radius of Jim Hogg County Airport, and within a
6.5-mile radius of O.S. Wyatt Airport.

    Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on May 11, 2021.
Martin A. Skinner,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2021-10209 Filed 5-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 11, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 91)]
[Notices]
[Page 27483]
[DOCID:fr11my06-55]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP06-339-000]

Northern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in FERC
Gas Tariff

May 4, 2006.
    Take notice that on May 1, 2006, Northern Natural Gas Company
(Northern), tendered for filing in its FERC Gas Tariff, Fifth Revised
Volume No. 1, First Revised Sheet No. 66D, with an effective date of
June 1, 2006.
    Northern states that it is filing the above-referenced tariff sheet
to submit a Rate Schedule TFX service agreement for Commission
acceptance as a non-conforming agreement.
    Northern further states that copies of the filing have been mailed
to each of its customers and interested State Commissions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-7172 Filed 5-10-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 10 (Friday, January 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4154-4156]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00812]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90890; File No. SR-NYSE-2020-103]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Amending Section 902.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual

January 11, 2021.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 28, 2020, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend Section 902.02 of the NYSE Listed
Company Manual (the ``Manual'') to modify the terms of the Investment
Management Entity Group Fee Discount. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries,

set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts
of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Pursuant to Section 902.02 of the Manual, the Exchange provides a
fee discount applicable only to an Investment Management Entity and its
Eligible Portfolio Companies (the ``Investment Management Entity Group
Fee Discount''). For purposes of Section 902.02, an Investment
Management Entity is a listed company that manages private investment
vehicles not registered under the Investment Company Act. An ``Eligible
Portfolio Company'' of an Investment Management Entity is a company in
which the Investment Management Entity has owned at least 20% of the
common stock on a continuous basis since prior to that portfolio
company's initial listing. The Investment Management Entity Group Fee
Discount is (i) limited to annual fees and (ii) represents a 50%
discount on all annual fees of an Investment Management Entity and each
of its Eligible Portfolio Companies in any year in which the Investment
Management Entity has one or more Eligible Portfolio Companies. As
currently applied, the Investment Management Entity Group Fee Discount
is subject to a maximum aggregate discount of $500,000 in any given
year (the ``Maximum Discount'') distributed among the Investment
Management Entity and each of its Eligible Portfolio Companies in
proportion to their respective eligible fee obligations in such
year.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ In addition to benefiting from the Investment Management
Entity Group Fee Discount, the Investment Management Entity and each
of the Eligible Portfolio Companies each continue to have its fees
capped by the applicable company's individual total maximum fee of
$500,000 per annum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to eliminate the Maximum Discount limitation
on the Investment Management Entity Group Fee Discount with effect from
the calendar year commencing January 1, 2021. Consequently, the
Investment Management Entity and each Eligible Portfolio Company would
receive a discount from each company's annual fee bill equal to 50% of
such company's annual fees, without any limitation imposed by the
application of the Maximum Discount. The purpose of this proposal is to
remove the arbitrary differences the application of the Maximum
Discount imposes on the benefits companies receive from the Investment
Management Entity Group Fee Discount.
    The following is an illustrative example:
    Scenario One: An Investment Management Entity incurs $500,000 in
annual fees before the discount and has two Eligible Portfolio
Companies, each of which incurs $250,000 in annual fees before the
discount. Applying the Maximum Discount on a prorated basis, the
Investment Management Entity would receive a discount of $250,000 (and
pay $250,000 in annual fees), while each of the two Eligible Portfolio
Companies would receive a discount of $125,000 (and each pay $125,000
in annual fees).
    Scenario Two: An Investment Management Entity incurs $500,000 in
annual fees before the discount and has four Eligible Portfolio
Companies, each of which incurs $250,000 in annual fees before the
discount. Applying the Maximum Discount on a prorated basis, the
Investment Management Entity would receive a discount of $166,666.67
(and pay $333,333.33 in annual fees), while each of the four Eligible
Portfolio Companies would receive a discount of $83,333.33 (and each
pay $166,666.67 in annual fees).
    In both these scenarios, the Investment Management Entity has the
same annual fee bill before the application of the Investment
Management Entity Group Fee Discount ($500,000) and each Eligible
Portfolio Company also has the same annual fee bill prior to the
application of the discount ($250,000). However, as a result of the
limitation imposed by the Maximum Discount, the Investment Management
Entity in Scenario One pays $250,000 in annual fees, while the
Investment Management Entity in Scenario Two pays $333,333.33 in annual
fees. Similarly, in both scenarios, all of the Eligible Portfolio
Companies have the same annual fee obligation of $250,000 prior to
application of the discount, but the limitation imposed by the Maximum
Discount causes the Eligible Portfolio Companies in Scenario One to pay
$125,000 in annual fees after application of the discount, while the
Eligible Portfolio Companies in Scenario Two each pay $166,666.67 in
annual fees. This proposal would eliminate this discrepancy in the
treatment of companies that are the same size and would otherwise be
subject to identical treatment for annual fee billing purposes.
    The Exchange notes that the elimination of the Maximum Discount
would result in reduction in revenue as the overall discount to annual
fees that companies can claim pursuant to the Investment Management
Entity Group Fee Discount would increase. Because only a small
percentage of listed companies qualify for the Investment Management
Entity Group Fee Discount, the proposed rule change would not affect
the Exchange's commitment of resources to its regulatory programs.
    The Exchange also proposes to make some nonsubstantive changes to
Section 902.02 to remove provisions that are no longer needed, as they
do not apply by their terms to any calendar year starting after January
1, 2019.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\4\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(4) \5\ of the Act, in particular, in that it
is designed to provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges. The Exchange also believes that the proposed
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\6\ in that
it is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to
foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating,
clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest
and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive marketplace for the
listing of equity securities. The Commission has repeatedly expressed
its preference for competition over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and services in the securities markets.
    The Exchange believes that the ever shifting market share among the
exchanges with respect to new listings and the transfer of existing
listings between competitor exchanges demonstrates that issuers can
choose different listing markets in response to fee changes.
Accordingly, competitive forces constrain exchange listing fees. Stated
otherwise, changes to exchange listing fees can have a direct effect on
the ability of an exchange to compete for new listings and retain
existing listings.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed amendment is equitable and
is

not unfairly discriminatory as it being implemented solely to avoid
arbitrarily different annual fee billing outcomes for companies based
solely on the impact of the Maximum Discount.
    Only a small percentage of listed companies qualify for the
Investment Management Entity Group Fee Discount. Consequently, the
proposed rule change would not affect the Exchange's commitment of
resources to its regulatory programs.
    The changes the Exchange proposes to make to Section 902.02 to
remove provisions that are no longer needed, as they do not apply by
their terms to any calendar year starting after January 1, 2019, are
nonsubstantive in nature.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Intramarket Competition.
    The purpose of the proposed amendment is to eliminate the arbitrary
effects of the of the [sic] Maximum Discount in the application of the
Investment Management Entity Group Fee Discount. As only a small
percentage of listed companies qualify for the Investment Management
Entity Group Fee Discount and the proposal makes the application of the
discount more consistent across that small category of listed issuers,
the Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will have
any meaningful effect on the competition among issuers listed on the
Exchange.
Intermarket Competition.
    The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market in which
issuers can readily choose to list new securities on other exchanges
and transfer listings to other exchanges if they deem fee levels at
those other venues to be more favorable. Because competitors are free
to modify their own fees in response, and because issuers may change
their listing venue, the Exchange does not believe its proposed fee
change can impose any burden on intermarket competition.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) \7\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-
4 \8\ thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge
imposed by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \9\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2020-103 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2020-103. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2020-103, and should be submitted
on or before February 5, 2021.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-00812 Filed 1-14-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P