APPENDIX K ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE SAN ANTONIO EAC REGION ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION MARCH 2004 K 2 Appendix K Table of Contents Page Alternative Fuel Survey                         ... K 3 Transportation Demand Management                 .  . K 17 Voluntary Air Quality Control Strategies       .         .  . K 25 Transportation Emission Reduction Measures     ..        .   K 39 Traffic Resignalization Emission Reduction Estimates            .. K 62 Energy Efficiency / Renewable Energy Projects    ...          .. K 85 Public Education                          .  .. K 87 Lawnmower Recycling Program           ..          .. K 91 Truckstop Anti Idling Program            ..          . K 95 Lower Reid Vapor Pressure             ..          . K 96 K 3 Alternative Fuel Survey Introduction A local alternative fuel survey has been conducted in 2001by staff of AACOG, which inventoried the AFV fleet in the SA MSA. The survey provided information on the number of AFVs, specific fuel type, the percentage of time that they operate on alternative fuel, the number of days per week they typically operate, and an estimate on how many vehicle miles traveled ( VMT) were accumulated by each vehicle for 2001.

The results indicated that there were 2,050 AFVs in the San Antonio region, and this number is expected to increase to 2,442 AFVs by 2006. The survey results were used to assess the effectiveness of both the current AFV fleet, and the 2007 AFV fleet, at reducing ozone precursor emissions. AFVs reporting a 0% usage rate of alternative fuels taken out, there were 1,755 vehicles modeled for the September 2001 fleet, and 2,147 vehicles modeled for the September 2007 fleet that use alternative fuel.

Analysis of operation of the 2001 AFV fleet indicates that this fleet is generating emissions reductions of 62 lbs./ day of VOC, 45 lbs./ day of CO, and 689 lbs./ day of NOx, and it is projected that this fleet could contribute emissions reductions of 72 lbs./ day of VOCs, 45 lbs./ day of CO, and 858 lbs./ day of NOx for the year 2007.

While these estimated reductions are not overly sizeable, they do illustrate that a switch to alternative fuel vehicles will result in the reduction of ozone precursors in addition to reducing our nation's dependence on foreign oil. As alternative fuel technology advances, refueling infrastructure expands, and the use of alternative fuels becomes more acceptable, the emissions reductions resulting from the utilization of an AFV fleet in the SA MSA should become more significant.

The following pages reproduce the survey materials distributed in 2001. The survey information is followed by the results. K 4 2001 Alternative Fuel Survey Alternative Fuel Work Schedule Survey COMPANY or ORGANIZATION FUEL  How much of each alternative fuel, in gasoline gallon equivalents ( gge), did your fleet consume in 2001? Natural Gas 0 Propane 0 Ethanol 0 Methanol 0 Biodiesel 0 Electricity 0 Fuel Stations Please update the number of vehicle alternative fuel refueling stations you operate on the following page. Please make sure that your station numbers add up ( that the number of stations for 2001 equals the number of 2000 stations, plus the number added in 2001, minus stations closed in 2001.) In addition, please forecast the number you plan to have in operation in the year 2006.

Public  A public refueling site is available for use by the general public, either by accepting cash/ credit payment, by prior arrangement, or by use of a refueling card.

Private  A private refueling site is not available for use by the general public. K 5 Alternative Fuel Refueling Stations Customer Availability ( Public or Private)

Public Private Fuel Type 2000 Total Added in 2001 Closed in 2001 2001 Total Planned for 2006 0 0 CNG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LNG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Propane 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ethanol 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Electric 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biodiesel 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Methanol 0 0 0 0 0 Other:

0 0 ________ 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 K 6 VEHICLES   Please update the number of alternative fuel vehicles in your fleet on the following page. Please make sure that your vehicle numbers add up ( that the number of vehicles for 2001 equals the number of 2000 vehicles, plus the number added in 2001,

minus vehicles retired in 2001).

Alternative Fueled Vehicles Vehicle Class Vehicle Type ( Car, Truck, Bus,

etc.) Fuel Type 2000 Vehicle Total Vehicles Added in 2001 AFVs Retired in 2001 2001 Reported Total Planned For 2006 Estimated Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Year for each Vehicle CNG 0 0 0 0 0 0 LNG 0 0 0 0 0 0 Propane 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ethanol 0 0 0 0 0 0 Electric 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biodiesel 0 0 0 0 0 0 Methanol 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other: ________ 0 0 0 0 0 0 LIGHT DUTY Light duty Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 7 Alternative Fueled Vehicles ( Cont.)

Vehicle Class Vehicle Type ( Car, Truck, Bus,

etc.) Fuel Type 2000 Vehicle Total Vehicles Added in 2001 AFVs Retired in 2001 2001 Reported Total Planned For 2006 Estimated Vehicle Miles Traveled Per Year for each Vehicle CNG 0 0 0 0 0 0 LNG 0 0 0 0 0 0 Propane 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ethanol 0 0 0 0 0 0 Electric 0 0 0 0 0 0 Biodiesel 0 0 0 0 0 0 Methanol 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other: ________ 0 0 0 0 0 0 Heavy Duty Heavy Duty Subtotal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 K 8 2001 Alternative Fuel Survey Results The results of the 2001 Alternative Fuel Survey can be found in the following tables. Averages and defaults used in the modeling are denoted in bold.

Table K 1. Light Duty Vehicles Operating on CNG Vehicle Class Organization 2001 Total % as AFV Days/ Week VMT 2006 Projected Increase LDT 12 TS Randolph 50 0% 0 5562 LDT 37 TS Lackland 118 0% 0 10,000 LDT BexarMet Water 34 90% 5 10,000 LDT CPS 2 100% 4 5 to 10,000 LDT SA Parks 22 100% 7 10,000 LDT TxDOT 46 90% 5 10,000 LDT USPS 4 0% 0 10,000 LDT UTSA 15 45% 5 5,486 LDT Yanaguana Cruise 40 100% 7 10,000 Total LDT CNG 331 K 9 Table K 2. Light Duty Vehicles Operating on Propane Vehicle Class Organization 2001 Total % as AFV Days/ Week VMT 2006 Projected Increase LDT AmeriGas 7 100% 5 10,000 LDT Beldon Roofing 74 86% 5 10,000 LDT Bell Hydrogas 16 100% 5 10,000 LDT Bexar County 60 50% 5 3795 25 LDT BexarMET Water 6 86% 5 10,000 LDT City of San Antonio 37 50% 5 13,514 LDT City of San Antonio 198 100% 5 13,514 55 LDT Mission Gas 14 100% 5 10,000 LDT Northside ISD 8 100% 5 10,000 LDT SA Inter. Airport 20 100% 5 10,000 LDT San Antonio Water System 43 14% 5 10,000 LDT SA Trans 18 100% 7 10,000 LDT Schwan's Enterprise 25 100% 5 10,000 LDT Texas State Hospital 52 86% 5 10,000 LDT Thad Ziegler Glass 37 86% 5 10,000 23 LDT TxDOT 188 86% 5 10,000 172 LDT US Park Service 1 86% 5 10,000 LDT UTSA 2 50% 5 16,602 LDT VIA Transit 184 100% 6 32,019 Total LDV Propane 990 K 10 Table K 3. Light Duty Vehicles Operating on Ethanol Vehicle Class Organization 2001 Total % as AFV Days/ Week VMT 2006 Projected Increase LDT 12 TS Randolph 1 0% 0 5,562 LDT CPS 21 0% 0 14,000 LDT USAA 100 0% 0 10,000 LDT USPS 1 0% 0 10,000 Total Ethanol 123 Table K 4. Light Duty Vehicles Operating on Electricity Vehicle Class Organization 2001 Total % as AFV Days/ Week VMT 2006 Projected Increase LDT 37th TS Lackland 2 100 5 10,000 LDT USAA 21 100 5 10,000 LDT UTSA 26 100 5 2,080 Total Electric 49 Table K 5. Heavy Duty Vehicles Operating on LNG Vehicle Class Organization 2001 Total % as AFV Days/ Week VMT 2006 Projected Increase Total LNG 0 Table K 6: Heavy Duty Vehicles Operating on Propane Vehicle Class Organization 2001 Total % as AFV Days/ Week VMT 2006 Projected Increase HDT VIA Transit 66 100% 7 34,295 37 HDT City of San Antonio 51 100% 5 9,551 Total HDV Propane 117 K 11 Table K 7. Heavy Duty School Buses Operating on Propane Vehicle Class Organization 2001 Total % as AFV Days/ Week VMT 2006 Projected Increase HDT NISD 440 100% 5 14,000 80 Total 440 Additional respondents to the survey included the Schertz Cibolo Universal City Independent School District and the City of Floresville. Both reported that they did not currently operate any AFVs.

These survey responses were analyzed through the use of the AirCRED model. Prior to the use of the AirCRED model, the survey results were first grouped together based on the percentage of time the vehicle operated on alternative fuels, and the number of days per week the vehicle typically operated. This was a necessary component of the modeling process since not all of the vehicles operated the same percentage of time on alternative fuels, or the same number of days per week, and these two fleet characteristics are required model inputs. For these reasons, the survey responses were categorized into nine groups as illustrated in the following pages.

Table K 8. Group 1   100%, 7 Days Per Week Group 1 Vehicles that operate 100% of the time on AFs, 7 days per week Vehicle Class Fuel Organization Total VMT % as AFV Days/ Week Total VMT Avg. VMT/ Yr Avg. Daily VMT LDT CNG SA Parks 22 10000 100 7 220000 LDT CNG Yanaguana 40 10000 100 7 400000 62 620000 10000 27 LDT Propane Satrans 18 10000 100 7 180000 10000 27 HDT Propane VIA Transit 66 34295 100 7 2263470 34295 94 Table K 9. Group 2   100%, 6 Days Per Week Group 2 Vehicles that operate 100% of the time on AFs, 6 days per week Vehicle Class Fuel Organization Total VMT % as AFV Days/ Week Total VMT Avg. VMT/ Yr Avg. Daily VMT LDT Propane VIA Transit 184 32,019 100 6 5891496 32019 103 K 12 Table K 10. Group 3   100%, 5 Days Per Week Group 3 Vehicles that operate 100% of the time on AFs, 5 days per week Vehicle Class Fuel Organization Total VMT % as AFV Days/ Week Total VMT Avg. VMT/ Yr Avg. Daily VMT LDT Propane AmeriGas 7 10000 100 5 70000 LDT Propane Bell Hydrogas 16 10000 100 5 160000 LDT Propane COSA 198 13514 100 5 2675772 LDT Propane Mission Gas 14 10000 100 5 140000 LDT Propane NISD 8 10000 100 5 80000 LDT Propane SA Int. Airport 20 10000 100 5 200000 LDT Propane Schwan's Ent. 25 10000 100 5 250000 280 3575772 12415.9 48 LDT Electric 37 TS Lackland 2 10000 100 5 20000 LDT Electric USAA 21 10000 100 5 210000 LDT Electric UTSA 26 80 100 5 2080 49 232080 4736.33 18 HDT Propane COSA 51 9551 100 5 487101 9551 37 School Bus Propane NISD 440 14000 100 5 6160000 14000 54 Table K 11. Group 4   100%, 4 Days Per Week Group 4 Vehicles that operate 100% of the time on AFs, 4 days per week Vehicle Class Fuel Organization Total VMT % as AFV Days/ Week Total VMT Avg. VMT/ Yr Avg. Daily VMT LDT CNG CPS 2 5000 100 4 10000 5000 24 Table K 12. Group 5   90%, 5 Days Per Week Group 5 Vehicles that operate 90% of the time on AFs, 5 days per week Vehicle Class Fuel Organization Total VMT % as AFV Days/ Week Total VMT Avg. VMT/ Yr Avg. Daily VMT LDT CNG BexarMet Water 34 10000 90 5 340000 LDT CNG TxDOT 46 10000 90 5 460000 Total 80 800000 10000 38 K 13 Table K 13. Group 6   86%, 5 Days Per Week Group 6 Vehicles that operate 86% of the time on AFs, 5 days per week Vehicle Class Fuel Organization Total VMT % as AFV Days/ Wee k Total VMT Avg. VMT/ Yr Avg. Daily VMT LDT Propane Beldon Roofing 74 10000 86 5 740000 LDT Propane BexarMet Water 6 10000 86 5 60000 LDT Propane Texas State Hosp. 52 10000 86 5 520000 LDT Propane Thad Ziegler Glass 37 10000 86 5 370000 LDT Propane TxDOT 188 10000 86 5 1880000 LDT Propane US Park Service 1 10000 86 5 10000 Total 358 3580000 10000 38 Table K 14. Group 7   50%, 5 Days Per Week Group 7 Vehicles that operate 50% of the time on AFs, 5 days per week Vehicle Class Fuel Organization Total VMT % as AFV Days/ Week Total VMT Avg. VMT/ Yr Avg. Daily VMT LDT Propane Bexar County 60 3795 50 5 227700 LDT Propane COSA 37 13,514 50 5 500018 LDT Propane UTSA 2 16,602 50 5 33204 Total 99 760922 7686.08 30 Table K 15. Group 8   45%, 5 Days Per Week Group 8 Vehicles that operate 45% of the time on AFs, 5 days per week Vehicle Class Fuel Organization Total VMT % as AFV Days/ Week Total VMT Avg. VMT/ Yr Avg. Daily VMT LDT CNG UTSA 15 5486 45 5 82290 5486 21 Table K 16: Group 9   14%, 5 Days Per Week Group 9 Vehicles that operate 14% of the time on AFs, 5 days per week Vehicle Class Fuel Organization Total VMT % as AFV Days/ Week Total VMT Avg. VMT/ Yr Avg. Daily VMT LDT Propane SAWS 43 10,000 14 5 430000 10000 38 K 14 Table K 17. 1999 AFV Participation and 2007 AFV Participation Projections for the San Antonio Metropolitan Area Summer 1999 Total Participation 2007 Total Participation LDT CNG 159 159 LDT Propane 982 1257 LDT Ethanol 0 0 LDT Electric 49 49 HDT LNG 0 0 HDT Propane 117 154 School Buses 0 0 Total 1307 1619 Fall 1999 Total Participation 2007 Total Participation LDT CNG 159 159 LDT Propane 990 1265 LDT Ethanol 0 0 LDT Electric 49 49 HDT LNG 0 0 HDT Propane 117 154 School Buses 440 520 Total 1755 2147 Table K 18. Anticipated 2007 VOC & NOx Emission Reduction Estimates ( lbs/ Day)

All AFVs 1999 All AFVs 2007 Category VOC NOx VOC NOx Summer Peak Hour Reduction 62.37 165.61 72.04 240.75 Fall Peak Hour Reduction 62.75 689.4 72.09 859.80 AFV Emission Reduction Methodology The alternative fuels considered in this study were liquefied petroleum gas ( LPG), compressed natural gas ( CNG), liquefied natural gas ( LNG), biodiesel, methanol, ethanol, and electricity.

The first step in the analysis process was to determine what alternative fuel types are being used in the San Antonio region. A questionnaire was distributed to both public and private entities seeking information on how many AFVs are in operation, what types of fuel they are using, and how many vehicle miles traveled ( VMT) were accumulated by using each vehicle throughout the year. In addition, a separate telephone survey was conducted to gather information on the percentage of time the vehicles were operating on alternative fuels, and the number of days per week these vehicles were in use. The results were supplemented by information gathered from the 2000 Alternative Fuel Survey and the 2001 Clean Cities Report for organizations that did not respond to the 2001 Alternative Fuel Survey. K 15 The combined results indicated that there are currently 2,050 AFVs in the San Antonio region, and this number is expected to increase to 2,442 AFVs by 2006. The AFVs operating solely on conventional gasoline were not included in the subsequent analysis, bringing the total number of vehicles modeled in the 2001 analysis down to 1,755 vehicles, and the vehicles modeled in the 2007 analysis down to 2,147 vehicles. In addition, the 448 current, and 528 proposed propane vehicles operated by the Northside Independent School District were included in the September analysis based on the September 1999 photochemical modeling episode.

Once the results of the alternative fuel survey were compiled, the estimated emission reductions resulting from the utilization of these vehicles were calculated. Since there were no reported uses of biodiesel, methanol, or ethanol, the AirCRED model was utilized to calculate the estimated emission reductions for the entire AFV fleet. This model, developed by Argonne National Laboratory to assist the Department of Energy's ( DOE's) Clean Cities coalitions, estimates the ozone precursor emissions reduction credits earned through the use of alternative fueled vehicles. The version of AirCRED that was used in this study is version 3.15, which was updated on August 1, 2001. The model is written in VisualBASIC for Microsoft Windows and consists of a series of screens, or forms, allowing for the input of data in a user friendly manner.

The required inputs for the AirCRED model include the Clean City to be modeled, the number of AFVs, the daily VMT by the AFVs, the weekly days of operation of the AFVs, and the percentage of time the vehicles operate as an AFV. These inputs were obtained from the survey results. In the absence of survey data related to vehicle miles traveled ( VMT), default VMT taken from the Dallas Fort Worth State Implementation Plan ( SIP) were used. These VMT defaults are 36,000 miles/ year for buses, and 10,000 miles/ year for other vehicles. ( TCEQ, 2000) A weighted average was calculated for the percentage of operation as an AFV, and a default of five days per week for the days per week of operation were used in the event that a response did not provide these values for a particular organization. An example of the weighted average calculation for light duty CNG fueled vehicles is provided below.

The survey results indicated that 64 of the reported CNG vehicles were operating 100% of the time on CNG, and 15 CNG vehicles were operating 45% of the time on CNG. The weighted average was calculated to be 90% for CNG vehicles through the use of the following formula and subsequent calculation:

(# of AFVs x % of operation as AFV) + (# of AFVs x % of operation as AFV) Total number of vehicles ( 64 x 100%) + ( 15 x 45%) / ( 64+ 15) = a weighted average of 89.6 or 90%

Once the required inputs were obtained or calculated, the last step in the process prior to actually running the model was to allocate the survey results, or the AFVs, into groups based on the percentage of time the vehicles operated on alternative fuels, and the number of days per week the vehicles typically operated. This was a necessary component of the modeling process since not all of the vehicles operated the same percentage of time on alternative fuels, or the same number of days per week, and these K 16 two fleet characteristics are required model inputs. For these reasons, the survey responses were categorized into 9 groups shown in the previous pages.

Having obtained the necessary inputs and broken the survey responses into similar categories, the AirCRED model was utilized to estimate the emission reductions resulting from the San Antonio MSA AFV fleet. The resulting emission reductions from each of the 9 groups were summed to obtain an emission reduction estimate for the entire fleet.

For the projected 2007 fleet it was assumed that the current fleet sizes were maintained at the current level unless otherwise noted. In addition, any projected increases in fleet sizes for 2006, were assumed to carry over into 2007. There were 2,147 vehicles modeled in the Sept. 2007 analysis. This represents a 22 percent increase in the AFV fleet size from 2001. The 2007 results are very similar to the 2001 results. In fact, the expected reduction in CO emissions is the same for both fleets. This is primarily due to the fact that all of the 392 additional AF vehicles are fueled by propane. The increase in the expected NOx reductions is a result of the 117 additional heavy duty propane vehicles. Again, the projected 2007 AFV fleet size makes up only a very small percentage of all of the on road vehicles within the region. If the AFV fleet size were to increase significantly, sizeable emission reductions should result.

The survey results were utilized in this section to assess the effectiveness of both the current AFV fleet, and the projected AFV fleet for 2007, at reducing ozone precursor emissions. With the AFVs reporting a 0% usage rate of alternative fuels taken out, there were 1,755 vehicles modeled for the September 2001 fleet, and 2,147 vehicles modeled for the September 2007 fleet that use alternative fuel.

The analysis of the SA MSA 2001 AFV fleet indicates that operation of this fleet help to reduce emission of VOC by a 62 lbs/ day and a 689 lbs/ day reduction in NOx emissions. The projected 2007 AFV fleet for the SA MSA indicates a 72 lbs/ day reduction in VOC emissions and an 858 lbs/ day reduction in NOx emissions.

While these estimated reductions are not overly sizeable, they do illustrate that a switch to alternative fuel vehicles will result in the reduction of ozone precursors in addition to reducing our nation's dependence on foreign oil. As alternative fuel technology advances, refueling infrastructure expands, and the use of alternative fuels becomes more acceptable, the emissions reductions resulting from the utilization of an AFV fleet in the SA MSA should become more significant. K 17 Transportation Demand Management Introduction TDMs are transportation projects and related activities that are designed to achieve onroad mobile source emission reductions and are included as control measures in the SIP. These measures target the users ( demand) of transportation facilities ( supply) rather than the facilities.

Successful implementation of TDMs can contribute to the reduction in frequency of traffic congestion, and by smoothing the traffic flow they can particularly reduce emission of VOCs, which occur at lower traveling speed.

The following pages contain materials that AACOG staff has used for conducting a local survey on use of TDMs, and at the end the overall impacts of TDMs on reduction of ozone precursors are discussed.

Cover Letter & Alternative Work Schedule Survey Questionnaire December x, 2001 Dear << Name>>:

The Alamo Area Council of Governments ( AACOG) requests your assistance in our air quality work. AACOG is currently examining the effectiveness of reducing air pollution by allowing alternate work schedules, and we'd like to include information about your organization in our study.

AACOG will calculate the effectiveness of such initiatives by using information gathered from the entire San Antonio area. The purpose of this survey is to provide better information and services to the region, as well as to help minimize additional regulations on the community.

Your input is vital to this process and will allow AACOG to estimate the reduction of air pollution based on recent changes in business practices within office personnel. Please provide your responses on the attached survey and return it to us in the self addressed envelope by the date indicated.

Thank you for your time and participation. If you have any questions or comments please feel free to contact Chris Langston at ( 210) 362 5270.

Regionally yours,

Al J. Notzon III Executive Director Enclosures ( 2) K 18 Alternative Work Schedule Survey Organization:___________________________________________________________ Contact:_______________________________________________________________ Contact Phone Number:___________________________________________________

The purpose of this survey is to collect information on the use of alternative work schedules by office personnel in organizations in the San Antonio Metropolitan Statistical Area. The following lines inquire on alternate work programs your company may/ may not participate in. Please respond by January 30, 2002.

Alternate Work Schedule Programs 1) Does your organization participate in any type of alternate work schedule program?

Yes

No

2) If so, identify the type of alternate work schedule program your organization participates in and how many employees are involved in such programs.

Compressed Week  9 work days for a two work weeks # of Employees ______

Compressed Week   4 work days for one work week # of Employees ______

Staggered Hours   vary start and end time ( ex. 9 6, 12 8) # of Employees ______

Flex Time # of Employees ______

Telecommuting   performs work at home # of Employees ______

If so, estimate average number of days worked at home. ______

3) Does your organization plan to expand any current alternate work schedule plans in the future?

Yes

No

4) How many more employees do you anticipate to participate in the future and in which program?

Thank you. K 19 2001 TDM Statistics on Survey Respondents Table K 19. Current Employee Participation Per Program Company Cww9 Cww4 Staggered Hrs Flex Time Telecommuting Big Red / 7 Up Bottling Co. 17.5 65 City of Hill Country Village 10 City of Leon Valley ** 19 15 Dean Word Co. Ltd. 90 Goodwill Industries 5 Health South RIOSA * 4 Mission Road Development Center 72 5 2 Oberthur Gaming Tech. 12 Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union 25 San Antonio  Bexar County MPO 7 San Antonio Express News 25 12 San Antonio Federal Credit Union** 13 Science Applications International Corp ( SAIC) 25 6 State Bank & Trust of Seguin, Texas 10 Town of Hollywood Park 1 WellMed at Greenway Park 7 5 1 City of China Grove 2 Marion ISD 25 City of Castle Hills 2 LeadingEdge Personnel 5 VIA Metropolitan Transit Authority 48 1416 258 John B. Sanfilippo & Son 285 YMCA of San Antonio & the Hill Country 650 Comal ISD ( Summer Only) 800 Northside ISD 9500 Texas Department of Human Services 300 200 100 Southwest Texas State University 7 7.5 Education Service Center, Region 20 75 Harlandale ISD 20 Southside ISD ( Summer Only) 60 Focus Direct, Inc. 32 52 7 Wallace L. Boldt, General Construction, Inc. 20 Southwest Mental Health Center 10 Our Lady of the Lake University ( Summer Only) 350 VNA & Hospice 7.5 1 Sterling Metal Products 6 Harlandale ISD ( Maintenance Department) 200 200 LaVernia ISD ( Summer Only) 23 0 0 Schertz Cibolo Universal City ISD 10 10 Tobin International Ltd. 94 20 24 2 San Antonio Housing Authority 1 21 13 1 K 20 Company Cww9 Cww4 Staggered Hrs Flex Time Telecommuting Valero Energy Corporation 1127 Bexar County 42 42 210 210 42 San Antonio Missions National Historical Park 2 52 37 SPTG, Lackland Air Force Base 4000 2500 City of Alamo Heights 4.5 Guadalupe Valley Hospital 10 2 6 Randolph Air Force Base 219 5 406 Southwest Independent School District 829 Audie L. Murphy Veterans Administration 117 50 885 1 San Antonio Police Department 225 U. S. A. A. 6940 727 Dee Howard Aircraft Maintenance, L. P. 298 San Antonio Independent School District 8 74 U. S. Army Garrison, FSH, TX. 1250 275 600 Standard Aero ( San Antonio), Inc 476 Zachry Construction Corporation 20 20 15 Morningside Ministries 3.5 Texas Department of Transportation 21 248 311 Human Systems Wing Brooks AFB, TX 1 Total Employee Participation per Program 3210.5 9204.0 19503.5 4536.5 827.0 Total EmployeeParticipation 37281.5 Total Companies not Participating in a Program 61 Total Companies Participating in a Program 60 * Compressed Work Week 12 ** Compressed Work Week 4 ½ K 21 Table K 20. Future Increase in Employee Participation Per Program Company Cww9 Cww4 Staggered Hrs. Flex Time Telecommuting Big Red / 7 Up Bottling Co. City of Hill Country Village City of Leon Valley Dean Word Co. Ltd. Goodwill Industries Health South RIOSA Mission Road Development Center 7 Oberthur Gaming Tech. Randolph Brooks Federal Credit Union San Antonio  Bexar County MPO 1 San Antonio Express News San Antonio Federal Credit Union Science Applications International Corp ( SAIC) State Bank & Trust of Seguin, Texas Town of Hollywood Park WellMed at Greenway Park City of China Grove Marion ISD City of Castle Hills LeadingEdge Personnel 20 VIA Metropolitan Transit Authority John B. Sanfilippo & Son YMCA of San Antonio & the Hill Country Comal ISD Northside ISD Texas Department of Human Services 35 Southwest Texas State University Education Service Center, Region 20 Harlandale ISD Southside ISD Focus Direct, Inc. Wallace L. Boldt, General Construction, Inc. Southwest Mental Health Center 15 Our Lady of the Lake University VNA & Hospice Sterling Metal Products Harlandale ISD ( Maintenance Department) LaVernia ISD Schertz Cibolo Universal City ISD Tobin International Ltd. San Antonio Housing Authority Valero Energy Corporation Bexar County San Antonio Missions National Historical Park K 22 37 SPTG, Lackland Air Force Base City of Alamo Heights Guadalupe Valley Hospital Randolph Air Force Base Southwest Independent School District Audie L. Murphy Veterans Administration 12 San Antonio Police Department U. S. A. A. Dee Howard Aircraft Maintenance, L. P. San Antonio Independent School District U. S. Army Garrison, FSH, TX. Standard Aero ( San Antonio), Inc Zachry Construction Corporation Morningside Ministries 311 Human Systems Wing   Brooks AFB, TX Texas Department of Transportation Total Future Employee Participation per Program 0 0 28 15 47 Total Future Employee Participation 90 Total Future Company Participation 18 Total Not Partipating in Future A. W. S. 42 Companies will expand, gave no details 12 Companies will expand, gave details 6 K 23 Table K 21. 1999 TDM Participation Rates and 2007 TDM Forecasted Participation in the San Antonio Metropolitan Area Participation 1999 Total 2007 Total Participation Summer All Programs 37,282 40,357 Flex Time 4,537 4,552 Compressed WW 4/ 40 9,204 9,680 Compressed WW 9/ 80 3,211 3,211 Staggered Hours 19,504 22,041 Telecommuting 827 874 Fall All Programs 38,514 41,590 Flex Time 4,537 4,552 Compressed WW 4/ 40 10,437 10,913 Compressed WW 9/ 80 3,211 3,211 Staggered Hours 19,504 22,041 Telecommuting 827 874 1999 & Anticipated 2007 VOC Emission Reduction Estimates ( lbs/ day)

Category All TDMs 1999 All TDMs 2007 Summer Peak Hour Reduction 470 386 Fall Peak Hour Reduction 430 388 1999 & Anticipated 2007 NOx Emission Reduction Estimates ( lbs/ day)

Category All TDMs 1999 All TDMs 2007 Summer Peak Hour Reduction 436 422 Fall Peak Hour Reduction 426 420 TDM Emission Reduction Methodologies The transportation demand management ( TDMs) discussed in this summary are programs implemented within the San Antonio metropolitan area to reduce vehicle miles traveled ( VMT) and shift remaining traffic to off peak hours. The data reflect the current TDM participation rates and future TDM commitments of companies in the San Antonio metropolitan area with employment population greater than 100 and government K 24 agencies. The TDMs used in this plan are broken down into several categories including: Rideshare, Telecommuting, Flex Time, Compressed Workweek, and Staggered Hours. All of these programs are voluntary and are offered at either the employer or employee level.

The first step in conducting the study involved an extensive survey, which was mailed out to 361 organizations in the AACOG region. 120 responses were received and the data from those surveys were tabulated for further analysis using the Commuter Model. The results were then entered into the Commuter Model, which calculated the emission and VMT reductions based on pertinent data such as: work trip length, vehicle occupancy, length of peak period, etc. Using the output from the Commuter Model and the anticipated TDM participation rates for 2007, the projected emission and VMT reductions were determined.

There was a significant difference in the participation rate for the September and July episodes, specifically, in level of participation in the Compressed Workweek 4/ 40 plan. Because of seasonal participation by educational institutions ( teachers, administrators, maintenance and custodial employees, bus drivers, etc.), approximately 1200 employees who participate in the plan during the academic year do not participate during the summer season. Therefore based on the July rate of participation for the 4/ 40 plan, no increase in participation for this plan for the year 2007 is projected; whereas based on the September data, a 4.36% increase in the Compressed Workweek 4/ 40 plan is expected.

The survey conducted on TDM participation showed that Staggered Hours was the most widely used TDM in this region, followed by Compressed Workweeks, Flex Time, and Telecommuting. Overall, for the year 2007 projection, these TDMs are expected to reduce VOC's by 3.3% and NOX by 2.4%, which are all produced by on road sources during peak hours. K 25 Voluntary Air Quality Control Strategies An integral part of air quality planning for the San Antonio EAC Region is the involvement of area leaders in business and industry, local school district officials, and other agencies in the adoption of voluntary measures. As part of the Clean Air Plan, AACOG compiled a special list of participating businesses and agencies within the area that have begun to adopt voluntary measures which will help clean the air. Responding companies and agencies categorized their actions as " Commitment Measures" or " Voluntary Measures" for incorporation into the plan.

Commitment Measures  These commitments are provided to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality ( TCEQ) and the US Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) as part of the Clean Air Plan and the State Implementation Plan ( SIP). The commitments are evidence of an ongoing commitment by local leaders in support of clean air policy.

Voluntary Measures  These commitments will be done on a voluntary basis to minimize emissions to the best of a company's ability.

It is important to understand that the following commitments were obtained from the agencies, and authorized by signature. The authorization consent form signed contains the following specific language, followed by the signature block: Authorization  I authorize the Air Improvement Resources Committee to include our actions and commitments, as described and classified above ( referring to the " Commitment" and " Voluntary" definitions above), in the Clean Air Plan that will be submitted to EPA and TCEQ. I understand that copies of our letters describing our commitment may be included in the Clean Air Plan.

A copy of one of the signed commitment letters ( from the San Antonio Water System) is attached to the end of this appendix as an example of this process and the form mailed out to each agency.

The following pages contain strategy descriptions of companies, agencies, and school districts that have volunteered to practice these air cleaning strategies.

Bexar County Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Renee D. Greene, P. E.   Director of Environmental Service, Bexar County, February 4, 2004 Converted eighty percent of its eligible fleet to propane. Alternative fuels with low Reid Vapor Pressure ( RVP) are purchased for gasoline powered vehicles. Providing bus pass subsidies to all employees A public outreach program has been developed and information is posted on the county's website. On Air Quality Health Alert Days, the county suspends activities such as refueling, paving, mowing and painting. Air Quality Health Alert flags are flown at all county offices. Low RVP gasoline is used in all Bexar County sheriff patrol vehicles. The County continues to replace fleet vehicles with low emission vehicles ( LEV). Texas Ultra Low Sulfur Diesel Fuel is used in Bexar County diesel fleet vehicles.

Voluntary Measures K 26 Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment when they are not in use, at home and at work. Maintain fleet vehicles and buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standard. Post signs at facilities promoting ozone reduction measures. Commit to using cleaner burning fuel Achieve code compliance in the International Energy Conservation Code ( IECC).

City of Converse Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Sam Hughes   City Manager, City of Converse, March 16, 2004 Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment to reduce power load when not in use, both at work and home). Maintain fleet vehicles and buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions standards. Refuel fleet vehicles and buses carefully and in the cooler evening hours during an AQHA. Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration, and driving 55 mph maximum.

Voluntary Measures Give incentives to those employees who are participating in a carpool or vanpool. Encourage employees to bring lunch to work or walk to avoid car travel during lunchtime.

City of Leon Valley Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by the Honorable Marcy Meffert, Mayor of the City of Leon Valley, March 11, 2004 Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off all lights and equipment to reduce power load, both at work and home). Maintain all 55 fleet vehicles and buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standards. Refuel all fleet vehicles and buses during cooler evening hours during an AQHA. Will limit the use of oil based paints, varnishes and degreasers to days that are not AQHA days. Instruct all employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving, such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration and driving 55mph maximum. Post signs at facilities promoting ozone reduction measures at 3 city owned locations. Achieve code compliance in the International Energy Conservation Code ( IECC).

Voluntary Measures Consider alternative fuels for vehicle fleets ( 10 or more vehicles per fleet). Participate in voluntary vehicle emissions testing and maintenance programs. Encourage approximately 30% of city employees to bring a lunch or walk to avoid car travel during lunchtime. Commit to using cleaner burning fuel when financially feasible.

City of San Antonio ( COSA) K 27 Commitment Measures: Commitment letter ( subject to further City Council action) signed by David E. Newman   Environmental Services Manager, City of San Antonio, March 5, 2004 Allow flextime or telecommuting for approximately 3000 city employees. Maintain fleet vehicles according to manufacturers tune up and emission control standard. The City performs inspection/ maintenance on approximately 3000 city fleet vehicles. Consider alternative fuels for small vehicle fleets. Approximately 900 city fleet vehicles are currently alternative fuel vehicles. Post signs at facilities promoting ozone reduction measures for 12,000 city employees. Commit to using cleaner burning fuel. Delay construction operations, such as pothole repair, street striping, and mowing activities, to days that are not Air Quality Health Alert days. Stage II VRS are in place on gasoline dispenser pumps at four service centers and police/ fire substations. Use thermoplastics for highway markings COSA's Landscape and Tree Preservation Ordinance attempts to preserve existing trees, encourage the planting of new trees, and encourage responsible development. Prohibit use of approximately 20 motorpool vehicles on AQHA days.

Voluntary Strategies Requested and obtained a lower RVP level for all gasoline shipped into the San Antonio metropolitan region for the ozone season of 1999. Stage I Vapor Recovery Systems ( VRS) are in place on UST's at all city fueling facilities. The Purchasing Department implements a modified I/ M program using a four gas emission analyzer. All vehicles are tested by the I/ M Program during the annual safety inspection. To encourage employee bus ridership, the City has a bus pass subsidy program for its employees. The City offers approximately 1500 bus pass subsidies at $ 5 off. Synchronization of stoplights by COSA. Public Outreach Participation. Sponsorship of Public Vehicles Emissions Testing & Media Events. Creation of a COSA wide Air Quality Health Alert Program. Creation of Intelligent Transportation System ( TransGuide). Encourage approximately 12,000 employees to use general energy conservation measures ( ie. Turn off lights and equipment to reduce power load when not in use, both at work and home). Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration, and driving 55 mph maximum. Successfully apply for emissions reductions grants available through theTexas Emission Reduction Program ( TERP). Expedited permitting for mixed use, transit oriented or in fill development Use low VOC striping material. Open burning restrictions. Renewable energy program. Low emission vehicles. Offer direct deposit to employees. Fuel city owned vehicles during the cooler, evening hours. Promote limiting the idling of city owned vehicles. K 28 Transit Oriented Development. Encourage approximately 12,000 employees to carpool by giving incentives for carpooling activities. Encourage approximately 12,000 employees to bring a lunch or walk to avoid car travel during lunchtime. Achieve code compliance in the International Energy Conservation Code ( IECC). Limit use of oil based paints, varnishes, and degreasers in the city's sign shop during an AQHA.

City of Stockdale Voluntary Measures: Letter signed by the Honorable Tony Malik, Mayor of the City of Stockdale, February 20, 2004 Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off all lights and equipment to reduce power load, both at work and home). Maintain fleet vehicles according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standards. Post signs at facilities promoting ozone reduction measures. Refuel fleet vehicles carefully and in the cooler evening hours during an AQHA. Will limit the use of oil based paints, varnishes and degreasers to days that are not AQHA days. Instruct employees to practice efficient driving, such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration and driving 55mph maximum.

City Public Service ( CPS) Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Joe Fulton   Director, Research and Environmental Management, City Public Service, March 19, 2004 Renewable Energy Program   Windtricity program launched in April 2000 Emission Reduction Program CPS has reduced NOx at gas and coal units to 50% of 1997 levels and will " net out" of NOx emissions when the new coal unit is scheduled to come on line in 2009. CPS' program includes combustion tuning and installation of advanced technology. CPS has state and federal air permits for all gas and coal units. New combined cycle gas turbine and simple cycle gas turbines have add on NOx controls. New coal unit will have BACT controls of NOx, sulfur dioxide and particulate matter. An additional monitoring station will be operated on the southeast side of San Antonio monitoring NOx, SO2, CO, PM 10 and PM 2.5. This will be in addition to the current operating station. Also, four PM 10 monitors will be located on all four sides of the coal plant property. Two compressed natural gas ( CNG) trucks are operated and a CNG station is used to fuel the vehicles. Fleet Vehicle Emission Reductions CPS uses ethanol ( E 85) in approximately 136 flex fueled vehicles. Two hybrid vehicles ( Super Ultra Low Emission Vehicles) purchased Two compressed natural gas ( CNG) trucks used. Night fueling service   approximately 300 fleet vehicles or equipment are fueled at night Vehicles periodically checked with 2 gas analyzer and opacity meter. Texas Emissions Reduction Program ( TERP) grant successfully obtained for diesel engine bulldozer K 29 Purchase of five propane forklifts Removal of older vehicles and equipment that have been replaced by vehicles and equipment that meet today's more stringent emissions standards.

Voluntary Measures Give incentives to CPS employees that are interested and participating in a carpool. Give incentives to CPS employees that are interested and use buses for their daily trip to work. Encourage approximately 2500 CPS employees to bring a lunch or walk to avoid car travel during lunchtime via email notices. All flextime or telecommuting for CPS employees for which this option is feasible and allowed by the management of that area. Encourage approximately 2500 CPS employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment when they are not in use, at home and at work.) Maintain CPS fleet vehicles according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standard. Instruct approximately 2500 CPS employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving, such as, avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration, driving 55 mph maximum. Limit use of oil based paints, varnishes, and degreasers during an AQHA.

Fort Sam Houston Independent School District Commitment Measures: Commitment Letter signed by Gail E. Siller   Superintendent, Fort Sam Houston ISD, February 25, 2004 Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration and driving 55 mph maximum. Encourage 225 district employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment when they are not in use, at home and at work). Maintain 10 district buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standard. Will not mow the lawn or use gas powered lawn equipment during an AQHA on the two district campuses.

Guadalupe County Voluntary Measures: Letter signed by Stan Burrier   County Engineer, Guadalupe County, March 17, 2004 Employees are encouraged to participate in voluntary programs, such as carpooling whenever possible. Encourage employees to bring a lunch of walk to avoid car travel during lunchtime. Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment when they are not in use, at home and at work). Maintain fleet vehicles and buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standard. Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving, such a, avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration, driving 55 mph maximum. K 30 Harlandale ISD Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Henry Galindo  Director of Transportation and Maintenance Support, Harlandale ISD, February 10, 2004 Uses nine alternative fuel buses and will continue to consider alternative fuels for all vehicle purchases. Maintain 150 maintenance vehicles and 59 buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standard. Consider alternative fuels for vehicle fleets ( 10 or more vehicles per fleet). Will not mow lawns or use gas powered lawn equipment during an AQHA at all 25 district facilities. Will limit the use of oil based paints, varnishes, and degreasers to days that are not designated as AQHA days at all 25 district facilities. Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving, such as, avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration, driving 55 mph maximum.

Voluntary Measures Encourage all 2,100 employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment when they are not in use to reduce power load, both at home and at work).

Lackland Independent School District Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by David F. Splitek   Superintendent, Lackland ISD, February 9, 2004 Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment to reduce power load when not in use, both at work and home). Maintain fleet vehicles and buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standard. Will not use oil based paints, varnishes or degreasers on days that are AQHA's. Encourage employees to bring lunch to work or walk to lunch to avoid car travel during lunchtime. Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration and driving 55 mph maximum. Post signs at facilities promoting ozone reduction measures Investigate the possibility in applying for emission reduction grants through the Texas Emissions Reductions Plan ( TERP). Will comply to a feasible extent the delay of construction operations ( using gasoline or diesel equipment) to days that are not Air Quality Health Alert days. During an AQHA, fleet vehicles and buses will be refueled in the cooler evening hours when possible. Gas powered lawn equipment will not be used during an AQHA. Rather, grounds personnel will be assigned alternative tasks.

Voluntary Measures Consider alternative fuels for vehicle fleets ( 10 or more vehicles per fleet). Participate in voluntary vehicle emissions testing and maintenance programs. Give incentives to those employees who are participating in a carpool Give incentives to those employees who use buses for their daily trip to work Check availability of fuel stations that dispense cleaner burning fuel. K 31 Will explore International Energy Conservation Code ( IECC) compliance.

Our Lady of the Lake University Voluntary Measures: Letter signed by Darrell Glasscock   Director of Physical Plant, Our Lady of the Lake University, February 13, 2004 Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment to reduce power load when not in use, both at work and home). Maintain fleet vehicles and buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions standards. Post signs at facilities promoting ozone reduction measures. On Air Quality Health Alert Days, the University will not mow the lawn or use gas powered lawn equipment.

Randolph Air Force Base Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Colonel Mark W. Graper   USAF, Commander, 12th Flying Training Wing, February 25, 2004 Converted from higher volatility fuel ( JP 4) to a more environmentally friendly JP 8 fuel. Encourage RAFB populace of 17,000 to use general energy conservation measures ( ie. Turn off lights and equipment to reduce power load when not in use, both at work and home). Consider alternative fuels for vehicle fleets. Currently, over 60 vehicles have been converted to alternative fuel capability. Post signs at facilities promoting ozone reduction measures. Encourage RAFB populace of over 17,000 people to bring a lunch or walk to avoid car travel during lunchtime. Maintain approximately 280 fleet vehicles and buses according to manufacturer's tuneup and emissions control standard. Instruct the base populace of over 17,000 people to practice efficient driving, such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration, driving 55 mph maximum.

Voluntary Measures Elevated research on development of sources for fuel alternatives. Review new technologies to ensure that they comply and that law does not hinder the use of new technologies. During AQHA days, refuel fleet vehicles and buses carefully and in cooler evening hours and on days that are not AQHA days. On AQHA days, will not use oil based paints, varnishes, or degreasers on days that are AQHA's.

San Antonio / Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Jeanne Geiger   Deputy Director, San Antonio Bexar County MPO, March 9, 2004 Provides funding for the Rideshare Program Participating in an ongoing public outreach program that encourages commuters to consider alternatives to driving alone. Allow employees to use flextme to encourage travel outside of the peak periods. Eight of eight employees use flex time. K 32 The MPO flies the AQHA flag on appropriate days to help create awareness of the AQ situation.

Voluntary Measures Encourage employees to bring lunch or walk and/ or carpool to lunch to reduce cold starts and emissions. Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment when they are not in use at home and at work.) Instruct employees to practice efficient driving, such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration, driving 55 mph maximum.

San Antonio Water System Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Eugene E. Habiger   President/ Chief Executive Officer, San Antonio Water Systems, March 2, 2004 SAWS has an internal Air Quality Committee that meets as needed to update or address air quality issues that affect SAWS operations. Once a year SAWS distributes information to 280,000 customers, encouraging them to practice emission reduction measures during the ozone season. Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures. At SAWS, demand side management is practiced. A lighting erplancement program to high efficiency T8 lighting with electronic ballasts is in place at the SAWS Service Centers and will be implemented at all other SAWS owned facilties. An energy database is being created to determine pump efficiencies. Building heating and cooling leaks will be determined using thermal imaging, as well as, preventative maintenance for pumps by setting thermal baselines. Evaluating all existing HVAC systems. Evaluating new roofing. Central Heating & Cooling retrofits. Maintain fleet vehicles according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standards. Considers alternative fuels for vehicle fleets. Have 5 propane trucks and 5 propane forklifts. Have 69 bi fuel ( unlead/ propane) vehicles and 4 electric forklifts. Working with AACOG, Ford, and CleanFuels on a LPG Fueling Station at the new Northwest Service Center. Looking into testing hydrogen fuel cell powered vehicles. Continue to post AQHA signs at SAWS facilities when an AQHA is issued. Flags and signs will be posted at the following Water Recycling Centers: Dos Rios, Leon Creek, Salado Creek, and Medio Creek. Flags and signs will be posted on the following Service Centers: Eastside, Mission Road, Northeast, Northwest, and Van Dyke. Will institute contract language to preclude mowing lawns or using gas powered lawn equipment during an AQHA. Encourage employees to bring lunch to work to avoid car travel during lunchtime. Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving, such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration. Stage I and II Vapor Recovery Systems at fleet fuel sites. Fleet fuel sites: K 33 Dos Rios Eastside Service Center Northeast Service Center Northwest Service Center Mission Road Van Dyken SAWS is currently complying with SECO reporting requirements in achieving code compliance in the International Energy Conservation Code ( IECC). Once a year, SAWS distributes information to approximately 340,000 accounts about encouraging them to practice emission reduction measures during the ozone season.

Voluntary Measures Allows flextime, compressed workweek, and / or telecommuting for employees. To encourage bus ridership, SAWS has a bus pass subsidy program for its employees. Consider posting signs and flags at SAWS facilities promoting ozone reduction measures. The Kelly Service Center is considering posting a flag and sign. The following Heating & Cooling Facilities are considering posting flags and signs: Central, Alamodome, Brooks, and Kelly. Commit to using cleaner burning fuel. Successfully apply for emissions reductions grants available through the TeXas Emissions Reductions Plan ( TERP). Refuel fleet vehicles in the cooler evening hours during an AQHA. Limit use of oil based paints, varnishes, and degreasers during an AQHA in partswashers procedures.

Seguin Independent School District Commitment Measures: Commitment document signed by Rene Ramos, Chief Operations Officer, Seguin ISD, February 13, 2004 The district does not use oil based paints. A district wide energy conservation program has been implemented. Energy conservation measures are included in district procedure manual. Maintain fleet vehicles ( 26) and buses ( 54) according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standards. Encourage employees ( 1,068) to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment to reduce power load when not in use, both at work and home). Post signs at facilities promoting ozone reduction measures. Do not mow lawns or use gas powered lawn equipment during an AQHA. Grounds personnel will be given alternative duties. Refuel district's 26 maintenance vehicles and 54 buses during cooler evening hours during an AQHA. Limit use of oil based paints, varnishes and degreasers to days that are not designated AQHA days. Painters will be instructed on measures during an AQHA. Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving, such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration, driving 55 mph maximum during employee training sessions. Post signs at facilities promoting ozone reduction measures in a district wide email forum.

Voluntary Measures K 34 Encourage employees to bring lunch to work or walk to lunch to avoid car travel during lunchtime by providing a break area and opportunities to by lunch in office.

South San Antonio ISD Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Ruben G. Flores   Administrator, South San Antonio ISD, February 26, 2004 Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment to reduce power load when not in use, both at home and work) during staff/ faculty meetings. Maintain fleet vehicles and buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emission control standard. Participate in voluntary vehicle emissions testing and maintenance programs. Refuel fleet vehicles and buses carefully and in the cooler evening hours during an AQHA. All maintenance personnel will be informed about limiting use of oil based paints, varnishes, and degreasers to days that are not AQHA days. Encourage employees to bring lunch or walk to avoid car travel during lunchtime. Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration and driving 55mph, maximum. Post signs at facilities promoting ozone reduction measures at district schools and administrative offices. All maintenance personnel will be informed to not mow lawns or use gas powered lawn equipment during an AQHA.

Voluntary Measures South San Antonio ISD will research and evaluate the consideration of alternative fuels for district vehicle fleet.

Texas Department of Transportation ( TxDOT) Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Ken Zigrang   District Planner, TxDOT, March 19, 2004 TxDOT allows VIA to operate and maintain 4 VIA Park and Ride public parking facilities for the public to access VIA buses on state highway right of way through Multiple Use Agreements. TxDOT maintains 25 carpool public parking facilites in San Antonio and the surrounding area counties on state highway right of way for citizens to use for carpooling. TxDOT allows the City of San Antonio to operate and maintain 16 general public parking areas on state highway right of way through Multiple Use Agreements. Courtesy Patrol Crews assist stranded motorists on Bexar County freeways 24 hours per day thus heloing minimize obstructions and traffic congestion. For highway maintenance in Bexar County, postpone highway mowing on the right ofway until after 12: 00 noon on Air Quality Health Alert ( AQHA) days. For highway construction and maintenance, postpone of delay highway work activities that require lane closures and would result in significant traffic congestion. Propane fueling facilities were installed at all 16 maintenance offices in San Antonio District in FY 2002. Use of TransGuide changeable message signs to inform motorists of vehicle accidents ahead, estimated travel times, lanes closed, detours etc. and thereby help reduce K 35 congestion and minimize the time required to open lanes after accidents and other highway incidents. Maintain state vehicles according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standards. Continue to purchase alternative fueled sedans and pick ups for the state fleet. TxDOT has in place several strategies to allow flexibility on Air Quality Health Alert Days. These include but are not limited to: Notifying all employees of pending Air Quality Health Alert Days by electronic mail the day before; allowing employees to better plan their travel. Refueling of TxDOT vehicles is restricted until the cooler evening hours. TransGuide messages to travelers to limit driving due to ozone levels. Postpone lawn mowing or use of gas powered lawn equipment at office grounds and for landscape maintenance contracts on AQHA days. In highway construction, contractors may not close any lanes during rush hours. Use alternative fuels in state vehicles. Agency diesel vehicles are fueled with Tx LED Voluntary Measures Utilizing flextime by employees, staggering staff arrival to avoid rush hour during the ozone season. During AQHAs, ask outlying offices to restrict travel to the main complex. Use of propane fuel in state vehicles in strongly encouraged. Encourage employees to use energy conservation measures ( ie., turn off vehicle engines when not in use at home and at work). Instruct employees to practice efficient driving practices such as avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, and avoiding jackrabbit acceleration. Ask outlying offices to postpone or minimize travel to the district headquarters complex.

UT Health Science Center at San Antonio Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Michael A. Charlton, Ph. D.   Director of Environmental Health and Safety, UTHSCSA, February 27, 2004 An on site vehicle preventive maintenance program to reduce fleet vehicle emissions. The University has a lighting retrofit project in place, which will decrease energy consumption. Maintain fleet vehicles and buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standard on all UTHSCSA vehicles. All grounds keeping staff will not mow lawns or use gas powered lawn equipment during an AQHA. Refuel vehicles and buses carefully and in the cooler evening hours during an AQHA. All Paint Shop employees will limit use of oil based paints, varnishes, and degreasers to days that are not an AQHA. Have reduced the number of University Police vehicles and have officers on bike patrol.

Voluntary Measures Participate in voluntary vehicle emissions testing and maintenance programs. Allow flextime, compressed workweek, and/ or telecommuting to employees. The University has policies in place for flextime and telecommuting, with a 20 % employee participation rate. Encourage employees to use general energy conservation measures ( i. e., turn off lights and equipment to reduce power load when not in use, both at home and work). K 36 Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving, such as avoiding successive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration, driving 55 mph. Consider alternative fuels for vehicle fleets ( 10 or more vehicles per fleet). Encourage employees to bring lunch to work or walk to avoid car travel during lunchtime.

Further Ozone Reduction Measures UTHSCSA has entered into a contract to upgrade boiler controls and reduce emissions from the main campus central energy plant. Upgrades will be done by July 31, 2005 and include emissions controls, burner management system, combustion controls, and emissions testing and verification. NOx emissions will be reduced by greater than 75%; CO will be reduced by 25%.

Valero Energy Corporation Voluntary Measures: Letter signed by Julie Klumpyan, Government Affairs, Valero Energy Corporation, March 12, 2004 Valero provided lower RVP gasoline during the ozone season of 1998. All area refineries voluntarily provided lower RVP ( 7.8) during ozone season of 1999. Valero Energy Corporation has provided fuel with a lower average sulfur level ( 150 ppm or less) in their gasoline over the past three years. Valero now produces Texas Low Emission Diesel. Valero's Three River's Refinery averaged 80 ppm sulfur in 2003. Encourage employees to bring a lunch or walk to avoid car travel during lunchtime. Valero Energy Corporation has a company cafeteria which reduces car travel during lunch.

VIA Metropolitan Transit Commitment Measures: Commitment letter signed by Priscilla Ingle   Vice President Public Affairs, VIA Metropolitan Transit, February 26, 2004 Diesel Fleet Emissions Reductions Voluntarily retrofitted all pre 19998 EPA emissions certified, Heavy Duty ( HD), diesel powered buses with exhaust catalysts ( catalytic converters). Since 1999, 345 early model, HD diesel buses have been replaced with late model propane and clean burning, diesel engine HD buses for a minimum 67% reduction in NOx emissions. 61 HD buses better CFFV ULEV emissions standards. Streetcars: 5 each, diesel powered streetcars replaced with LPG ( CFFV LEV) streetcars for a 71% reduction in NOx emissions on a per vehicle basis. 4 each, diesel powered streetcars repowered with LPG ( CFFV LEV) engines for a 56% reduction in NOx emissions on a per vehicle basis. Bus Garage Improvements Currently expanding LPG fuel dispensing capacity Replacing solvent based parts cleaners with water/ steam type cleaners On Street Improvements Bike racks on all HD buses Instruct employees and fleet drivers to practice efficient driving, such as, avoiding excessive idling, minimizing cold starts by combining trips, avoiding jackrabbit acceleration, driving 55 mph maximum. These practices are taught and monitored. Electricity Consumption K 37 Committed to include International Energy Conservation Codes on new construction projects.

Voluntary Measures Propane ( LPG) Fleet Emissions Reductions Operates alternatively fueled ( LPG) vehicles 92 each, dedicated and bi fuel, transit patrol cars and support vehicles 105 each, dedicated LPG, paratransit vehicles 67 each, dedicated LPG, 30 ft passenger buses certified to CFFV LEV standards 9 each, dedicated LPG, streetcars. Certified to CFFV LEV standards A TERP grant application is being prepared to repower/ retrofit 67 each CFFV LEV propane engines to achieve a 28% reduction in NOx emissions on a per vehicle basis, bettering CFFV ULEV standards. Preparations are underway to replace the current paratransit fleet vehicles with new vehicles that are expected to better CFFV ULEV standards and provide a minimum, 70% reduction in NOx emissions on a per vehicle basis. Supports efforts to expand the use of propane as an automotive fuel Provides propane related technical support to other fleets Actively participates in propane engine and motor fuel R& D Diesel Fleet Emissions Reductions 281 HD buses operate on Diesel # 1 versus Diesel # 2 for reduced levels of NOx and PM emissions. 61 HD buses operated on Texas Low Emissions Diesel ( ULSD). Preliminary grant approval has been received to retrofit 217 diesel powered HD buses with EGR and PM filters. One retrofitted the NOx emissions, on a per vehicle basis, will be reduced at least 40% and will better CFFV ULEV standards. Preliminary grant approval has been received to fund the pull ahead use of Texas Low Emission Diesel in all pre 2004 emissions certified HD diesel buses for a 7% reduction in NOx. Scheduled to replace, within 2 years, 1998 and 1992 year model HD buses to achieve a 77% and 50% ( respectively) reductions in NOx emissions on a per vehicle basis. Within 2 years, following the approval and implementation of retrofit and replacement programs, all diesel operated HD buses are expected to operate at emissions levels that are better CFFV ULEV standards. This reduction will provide an overall 46% reduction in diesel fleet NOx emission compared to current ( early 2004) levles and a 77% reduction in HD diesel fleet NOx emissions since 1999. Bus Garage Improvements Recovers paint solvents Planned CARB compliant booth replacement 61 buses equipped with dry break fuel nozzles On Street Improvements Tree planting at bus stops program Employee Incentives Provides fee fares to employee bus riders Allows flextime reducing utility peaks Provides reserved parking spaces for employees who carpool Education and Cooperation: Business K 38 Operates a business pass program ( over 100 companies currently provide bus passes to their employees on site, at cost or reduced price). Public Provides advertising to encourage transit ridership Encourages employers to provide discounts as incentives to transit riders Sponsors a yearly Environmental Symposium ( 3 years) Educates students about transit ( Classroom on Wheels Project) Promotes AACOG's Guaranteed Ride Home Program Electricity Consumption Since 2001, VIA has reduced electricity consumption by 8% VIA continues its efforts to reduce electricity consumption Lighting retrofits Employee awareness Garage facility retrofits VIA is an active member of the Metropolitan Partnership for Energy working to increase energy efficiency and reduce pollution in the San Antonio area. Encourage employees to bring a lunch or walk to avoid car travel during lunchtime. Maintain fleet vehicles and buses according to manufacturer's tune up and emissions control standard. Signs are posted throughout the VIA facility that promote ozone reduction measures. Ninety percent of all vehicles are refueled after 8: 00 p. m. during an AQHA. Will not mow the lawn or use gas powered lawn equipment during an AQHA as much as possible. Will limit the use of oil based paints, varnishes, and degreasers during an AQHA as much as possible. K 39 Transportation Emission Reduction Measures Fiscal Years 2002 2003 Introduction Transportation Emission Reduction Measures ( TERMs) are strategies or actions that can be employed to offset increases in nitrogen oxide ( NOx) and volatile organic compound emissions from mobile sources. All TERMs are intended to reduce either the number of vehicle trips, vehicle miles traveled, or both. These strategies may include ridesharing and telecommuting programs, clean fuel vehicle programs, which were all described in previous sections, and improved transit/ bicycling facilities, or other possible actions such as intersection improvement and signalization.

Many of the transit and highway projects included in the MPO's Transportation Improvement Programs ( TIP) provided in the following pages qualify as a TERM project, as they target vehicle trip reduction and, ultimately, improvement in the air quality.

It is important to note that TERMS can be quantified as creditable reductions. While the quantity of reductions have not been calculated and included in the attainment demonstration of the San Antonio proposed revisions to the State Implementation Plan, local air quality planners are now researching measures to make the TERMS enforceable. The region is intent on making them enforceable and calculating credit for them in coordination with the state and the local San Antonio / Bexar County Metropolitan Planning Organization. Even if credit is not taken here for the TERMS projects in the region, the benefits of the reductions accrue as Additional Evidence that the San Antonio region will reach attainment.

San Antonio Bexar Metropolitan Area Transportation Improvement Program ( TIP) Completed FY 2002 Roadway Projects CSJ Number: 17 2 63 Federal Cost: $ 22,744 Project ID: 3286 State Cost: $ 2,527 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 35 Project Cost: $ 25,272 Limit From: 0.17 Miles E of Benton City Road Let Date: 8/ 02 Limit To: IH 410 Funding Category: 4A STP Safety Project Description: Texturize shoulders ( milled) Completion Date: 2/ 02 CSJ Number: 17 3 53 Federal Cost: $ 64,735 Project ID: 3287 State Cost: $ 7,192 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 35 Project Cost: $ 71,928 Limit From: Atascosa County Line Let Date: 08/ 02 Limit To: 0.17 Miles E of Benton City Road Funding Category: 4A STP Safety Project Description: Texturize shoulders ( milled) Completion Date: 12/ 02 K 40 CSJ Number: 17 10 205 Federal Cost: $ 32,000 Project ID: 3110 State Cost: $ 8,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: I H 35 Project Cost: $ 40,000 Limit From: SB Mainlanes Let Date: 11/ 01 Limit To: At Coliseum Rd. Funding Category: 6A BRDG ON SYS Project Description: Rehabilitate bridges & approaches Completion Date: 10/ 02 CSJ Number: 17 10 213 Federal Cost: $ 1,400,850 Project ID: 3174 State Cost: $ 155,500 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: I H 35 Project Cost: $ 1,556,500 Limit From: Fratt Interchange Let Date: 05/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 2 IM Project Description: Asphaltic overlay Completion Date: 11/ 02 CSJ Number: 17 10 215 Federal Cost: $ 247,592 Project ID: 3284 State Cost: $ 61,898 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 35 Project Cost: $ 309,490 Limit From: At Coliseum & Walters Let Date: 11/ 01 Limit To : Funding Category: 2 IM Project Description: Landscape development & right turn lanes Completion Date: 10/ 02 CSJ Number: 25 2 161 Federal Cost: $ 1,800,000 Project ID: 3264 State Cost: $ 200,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 10 Project Cost: $ 2,000,000 Limit From: On IH 10 at Houston Let Date: 11/ 01 Limit To: Funding Category: 2 IM Project Description: Restore existing SB frontage road Completion Date: 10/ 02 CSJ Number: 25 2 162 Federal Cost: $ 98,820 Project ID: 3288 State Cost: $ 10,980 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 10 Project Cost: $ 109,800 Limit From: IH 410 Let Date: 08/ 02 Limit To: Guadalupe County Line Funding Category: 4A STP Safety Project Description: Texturize shoulders ( milled) Completion Date: 12/ 02 K 41 CSJ Number: 25 2 163 Federal Cost: $ 1,440,000 Project ID: 3330 State Cost: $ 160,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 10 Project Cost: $ 1,600,000 Limit From: at Loop 1604 Let Date: 08/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 2 IM Project Description: Reconfiguring Intersection Completion Date: 02/ 04 CSJ Number: 72 12 159 Federal Cost: $ 66,061,360 Project ID: 703 State Cost: $ 16,515,340 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 10 Project Cost: $ 82,576,700 Limit From: 0.2 Mi S of Callaghan Rd. Let Date: 07/ 02 Limit To: 0.2 Mi S of Crossroads Blvd. Funding Category: 3A NHS Mobility Project Description: Reconstruct Interchange & TMS Completion Date: 02/ 08 ( Phase 2) IH 10/ IH 410 ( Phase 2)

CSJ Number: 521 4 242 Federal Cost: $ 768,000 Project ID: 3283 State Cost: $ 192,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 410 Project Cost: $ 960,000 Limit From: At SH 151 Let Date: 06/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 3E NHS Misc Project Description: Construct turnarounds at IH 410 & SH 151 Completion Date: 08/ 04 CSJ Number : 521 5 120 Federal Cost: $ 59,374 Project ID: 3289 State Cost: $ 6,597 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 410 Project Cost: $ 65,972 Limit From: US 281 Let Date: 08/ 02 Limit To: IH 35 Funding Category: 4A STP Safety Project Description: Texturize shoulders ( milled) Completion Date: 12/ 02 CSJ Number: 521 5 121 Federal Cost: $ 46,331 Project ID: 3331 State Cost: $ 5,147 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 410 Project Cost: $ 51,479 Limit From: IH 35 Let Date: 08/ 02 Limit To: US 90 Funding Category: 4A STP Safety Project Description: Texturize Shoulders ( Milled) Completion Date: 12/ 02 K 42 CSJ Number: 521 6 90 Federal Cost: $ 88,964 Project ID: 3290 State Cost: $ 9,884 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 410 Project Cost: $ 98,849 Limit From: IH 10 Let Date: 08/ 02 Limit To: US 281 Funding Category: 4A STP Safety Project Description: Texturize shoulders ( milled) Completion Date: 12/ 02 CSJ Number: 849 1 42 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3350 State Cost: $ 85,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: FM 471 Project Cost: $ 85, 000 Limit From: 130' East of Bexar County Line Let Date: 08/ 02 Limit To: Bexar/ Medina County Line Funding Category: 7 Prev. Maint. Project Description: Drainage Improvement Completion Date: 12/ 02 CSJ Number: 915 0 79 Federal Cost: $ 900,000 Project ID: 3245 State Cost: $ 100,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Districtwide Project Cost: $ 1,000,000 Limit From: Various locations Let Date: 01/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 2 IM Project Description: Small sign safety upgrade ( FY2002) Completion Date: 10/ 02  Cat 2 CSJ Number: 915 12 228 Federal Cost: $ 2,029,689 Project ID: 18.1 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 507,422 Roadway Name: Pleasanton Project Cost: $ 2,537,111 Limit From: Southcross Let Date: 12/ 01 Limit To: Mayfield Funding Category: 4C STP MM Project Description: Rehabilitate & widen narrow Completion Date: 10/ 03 pavement for center left turn lane, provide sidewalksand intersection improvements at Southcross CSJ Number : 915 12 263 Federal Cost: $ 164,800 Project ID: 2032 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 41,200 Roadway Name: Alamo Area Commute Solutions Prog. Project Cost: $ 206,000 Limit From: In San Antonio Bexar Co. Area Let Date: 08/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 4C STP MM K 43 Project Description: Operational costs for air quality program, Completion Date: 07/ 03 Ridematching and carpool services CSJ Number: 915 12 276 Federal Cost: $ 4,160,000 Project ID: 2050 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 1,040,000 Roadway Name: Hunt Lane Project Cost: $ 5,200,000 Limit From: Marbach Let Date: 03/ 02 Limit To: US 90 Funding Category: 4C STP MM Project Description: Reconstruct & widen for CLTL between Completion Date: 02/ 04 Demya & US 90 w/, sidewalks, & intersection improvements at Marbach and Adams Hill CSJ Number: 915 12 297 Federal Cost: $ 1,200,800 Project ID: 2072 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 300,200 Roadway Name: New World Project Cost: $ 1,501,000 Limit From: Crestway Let Date: 06/ 02 Limit To: Montgomery Funding Category: 4C STP MM Project Description: Rehabilitate and widen narrow pavement Completion Date: 03/ 04 w/ curbs & sidewalks CSJ Number: 915 12 298 Federal Cost: $ 1,338,800 Project ID: 2073 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 334,700 Roadway Name: New World Project Cost: $ 1,673,500 Limit From: Montgomery Dr Let Date: 06/ 02 Limit To: Walzem Rd ( FM 1976) Funding Category: 4C STP MM Project Description: Rehabilitate and widen narrow pavement Completion Date: 03/ 04 w/ curbs & sidewalks CSJ Number: 915 12 308 Federal Cost: $ 149,940 Project ID: 2075 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 37,485 Roadway Name: Rideshare/ Air Quality Prog., FY 2001 Project Cost: $ 187,425 Limit From: In San Antonio Bexar Co. Area Let Date: 10/ 01 Limit To: Funding Category: 4C STP MM Project Description: Operational costs for air quality program Completion Date: 07/ 02 K 44 Ridematching and carpool services CSJ Number; 915 12 309 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3116 State Cost: $ 1,800,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Park Road Project Cost: $ 1,800,000 Limit From: In Government Canyon State Park Let Date: 09/ 01 Limit To: Funding Category: 9 Park Project Description: Construct a two lane State Park Roadway Completion Date: 03/ 03 CSJ Number: 915 12 340 Federal Cost: $ 224,880 Project ID: 3035 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 56,200 Roadway Name: City Wide ADA Sidewalk Program ( Pha Project Cost: $ 281,100 Limit From: City Wide Let Date: 01/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 4C STP MM Project Description: Reconstruct and/ or provide ADA Completion Date: 09/ 03 accessible sidewalks CSJ Number: 915 12 350 Federal Cost: $ 233,860 Project ID: 3131 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 58,465 Roadway Name: Alamo Project Cost: $ 292,326 Limit From: Cedar Let Date: 01/ 02 Limit To: San Antonio River Funding Category: 4C STP MM Project Description: Construct sidewalks Completion Date: 09/ 03 CSJ Number: 915 12 395 Federal Cost: $ 2,588,197 Project ID: 3291 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 810,771 Roadway Name: Mission Trails ( Espada to the Alamo) Project Cost: $ 3,398,968 Limit From: Phase 3A  E Southcross to Mitchell Let Date: 06/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 4B STP Enhance Project Description: Enhance roadways, trails, and markers Completion Date: 12/ 03 that lead to the Missions CSJ Number: 915 12 396 Federal Cost: $ 162,000 Project ID: 3310 State Cost: $ 18,000 K 45 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Donop Road Project Cost: $ 180,000 Limit From: At UPRR Let Date: 01/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 4A STP Safety Project Description: Install railroad warning lights and gates Completion Date: 12/ 04 CSJ Number: 915 12 397 Federal Cost: $ 144,000 Project ID: 3309 State Cost: $ 16,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: South Graf Road Project Cost: $ 160,000 Limit From: At UPRR Let Date: 01/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 4A STP Safety Project Description: Install railroad warning lights and gates Completion Date: 12/ 04 CSJ Number: 1548 2 5 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3271 State Cost: $ 260,100 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: FM 1303 Project Cost: $ 260,100 Limit From: Loop 1604 Let Date: 09/ 01 Limit To: Wilson County Line Funding Category: 14 State Rehab Project Description: Widen Pavement, Seal Coat & ACP Completion Date: 02/ 03 Overlay CSJ Number: 3212 6 12 Federal Cost: $ 624,000 Project ID: 3040 State Cost: $ 156,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Ralph Fair Rd. ( FM 3351) Project Cost: $ 780,000 Limit From: @ Fawn Mountain, Pimlico, Dietz Elkhorn Let Date: 10/ 01 Limit To: a nd Fair Oaks Parkway Funding Category: 4C STP MM Project Description: Widen pavement for left turn lanes Completion Date: 10/ 02 CSJ Number: 3508 1 18 Federal Cost: $ 13,632,000 Project ID: 3232 State Cost: $ 3,408,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: SH 151 Project Cost: $ 17,040,000 Limit From: 0.22 Miles West of Callaghan Rd. Let Date: 01/ 02 Limit To: 0.3 Miles East of IH 410 Funding Category: 4C( S) STP MM ( S) Project Description: Expand to 4 lane freeway with frontage Completion Date: 06/ 04 roads K 46 CSJ Number: 3508 1 19 Federal Cost: $ 17,630,400 Project ID: 3233 State Cost: $ 4,407,600 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: SH 151 Project Cost: $ 22,038,000 Limit From: 0.3 Miles East of IH 410 Let Date: 06/ 02 Limit To: 1.00 Miles East of Loop 1604 Funding Category: 4C( S) STP MM ( S) Project Description: Expand to 4 lane freeway with Completion Date: 08/ 04 rehabilitation on frontage roads San Antonio Bexar Metropolitan Area TIP Completed FY 2002 Transit Projects CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 307,218 Project ID: 3090 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 76,804 Project Name: Revenue Vehicles Total Cost: $ 384,022 Project Description: Purchase Replacement Low Floor Buses Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 123,600 Project ID: 3094 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 30,900 Project Name: Revenue Vehicles Total Cost: $ 154,500 Project Description: Purchase Paratransit Vans Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 37,808 Project ID: 3195 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 9,452 Project Name: Preventative Maintenance Total Cost: $ 47,260 Project Description: Preventative Maintenance Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 90,000 Project ID: 3097 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 22,500 Project Name: Service Vehicles  Sedans Total Cost: $ 112,500 Project Description: Purchase Replacement Sedans Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 56,543 K 47 Project ID: 3161 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 14,136 Project Name: Service Vehicles  Trucks Total Cost: $ 70,679 Project Description: Purchase Service Trucks Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 1,662,046 Project ID: 3162 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 415,511 Project Name: Headquarters Rehabilitation Total Cost: $ 2,077,557 Project Description: PE, Final Design, Construction, Construction Management Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 202,022 Project ID: 3022.2 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 50,506 Project Name: Passenger Facilities  Kel Lac P& R Total Cost: $ 252,528 Project Description: PE, Final Design, Land Acq ( if needed) Construction, Construction Management Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 4,816 Project ID: 3171.2 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 1,204 Project Name: Passenger Facilities  US 281/ Loop 1604 Total Cost: $ 6,020 Project Description: PE, Final Design, Land Acq ( if needed) Construction, Construction Management Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 4,816 Project ID: 3171.2 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 1,204 Project Name: Passenger Facilities  US 281/ Loop 1604 Total Cost: $ 6,020 Project Description: PE, Final Design, Land Acq ( if needed) Construction, Construction Management Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 418,471 Project ID: 3196 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 104,618 K 48 Project Name: Passenger Facilities  Rehab P& R Total Cost: $ 523,089 Project Description: PE, Final Design, Land Acq ( if needed) Construction, Construction Management Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 136,609 Project ID: 3197 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 34,152 Project Name: Passenger Facilities  Bus Shelters & Benches Total Cost: $ 170,761 Project Description: PE, Final Design, Land Acq ( if needed) Construction, Construction Management Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 727,078 Project ID: 3113 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 181,770 Project Name: Equipment Total Cost: $ 908,848 Project Description: MIS Hardware Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 679,131 Project ID: 3158 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 169,783 Project Name: Equipment Total Cost: $ 848,914 Project Description: MIS Software Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 160,209 Project ID: 3073 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 40,052 Project Name: Equipment Total Cost: $ 200,261 Project Description: Miscellaneous Equipment Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 397,004 Project ID: 3170.1, 3170.2 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 99,251 Project Name: Planning Study Total Cost: $ 496,255 Project Description: Comprehensive Service Assessment Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies K 49 CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 722,573 Project ID: 3169.1, 3169.2 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 180,643 Project Name: Planning Study Total Cost: $ 903,216 Project Description: Business Process Review Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 119,847 Project ID: 3076.1, 3076.2 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 29,962 Project Name: Passenger Facilities  Downtown West Total Cost: $ 149,809 Project Description: PE, Final Design, Land Acq ( if needed) Construction, Construction Management Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 205,035 Project ID: 3176.1, 3076.2 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 51,259 Project Name: Passenger Facilities  South Central Total Cost: $ 256,294 Project Description: PE, Final Design, Land Acq ( if needed) Construction, Construction Management Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies San Antonio Bexar Metropolitan Area TIP Completed FY 2003 Roadway Projects CSJ Number: 16 7 116 Federal Cost: $ 729,000 Project ID: 3247 State Cost: $ 81,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 35 Project Cost: $ 810 Limit From: 0.189 Mi N of Crestway Let Date: 01/ 03,000 Limit To: 0.189 Mi N of Topperwein Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal coat and overlay frontage roads Completion Date: 01/ 04 CSJ Number: 17 1 22 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3275 State Cost: $ 381,900 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Loop 353 Project Cost: $ 381,900 Limit From: 150 ft South of Loop 13 Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: Indian Creek Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab K 50 Project Description: Planing, Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, & Completion Date: 12/ 03 Pavement Markings CSJ Number: 17 10 222 Federal Cost: $ 270,000 Project ID: 3351 State Cost: $ 30,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 35 Project Cost: $ 300,000 Limit From: 0.068 Mi. South of Walzem Road Let Date: 05/ 03 Limit To .164 Mi. S of Whirlwind Drive Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal coat and overlay frontage roads Completion Date: 01/ 04 CSJ Number: 24 7 44 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3265 State Cost: $ 1,014,500 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: US 90 Project Cost: $ 1,014,500 Limit From: Loop 1604 Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: IH 410 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, & Pavement Completion Date: 12/ 03 Markings CSJ Number: 24 7 45 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3266 State Cost: $ 593,800 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: US 90 Project Cost: $ 593,800 Limit From: Loop 1604 Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: SH 211 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab CSJ Number: 24 7 46 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3267 State Cost: $ 539,100 Project Description: Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, & Pavement Completion Date: 12/ 03 Markings County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: US 90 Project Cost: $ 539,100 Limit From: Bexar/ Medina County Line Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: SH 211 Funding Category 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab: Project Description: Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, & Pavement Completion Date: 12/ 03 Markings K 51 CSJ Number: 24 7 47 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3268 State Cost: $ 44,300 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: US 90 Project Cost: $ 44,300 Limit From: US 90 EB Exit Ramp ( Beg) Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: US 90 EB Exit Ramp ( End) Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Rework Base, Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, Completion Date: 03/ 03 & Pavement Markings CSJ Number: 24 8 110 Federal Cost: $ 6,800,000 Project ID: 3082 State Cost: $ 5,237,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: US 90 Project Cost: $ 12,037,000 Limit From: At 36th Street intersection Let Date: 05/ 03 Limit To: Funding Category: 4  State Connect Project Description: Reconstruct intersection Completion Date: 04/ 05 CSJ Number: 24 8 115 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3269 State Cost: $ 157,200 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: US 90 Project Cost: $ 157,200 Limit From: US 90 NE Frontage Road Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: SB IH 410 Entrance Ramp Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Rework Base, Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, Completion Date: 03/ 03 & Pavement Markings CSJ Number: 72 7 50 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3342 State Cost: $ 73,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 10 Project Cost: $ 73,000 Limit From: Bexar County Line EB Frontage Road Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: Boerne Stage Road Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal Coat and Pavement Markings Completion Date: 01/ 04 CSJ Number: 72 7 51 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3343 State Cost: $ 59,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 10 Project Cost: $ 59,000 K 52 Limit From: Bexar County Line WB Frontage Road Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: West of FM 3351 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal Coat and Pavement Markings Completion Date: 01/ 04 CSJ Number: 72 12 130 Federal Cost: $ 42,653,760 Project ID: 3236 State Cost: $ 10,663,440 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 10 Project Cost: $ 53,317,200 Limit From: 0.2 Miles South of Crossroads Blvd. Let Date: 06/ 03 Limit To: Fulton Avenue Funding Category: 7  Metro Mobility Project Description: Upgrade to 10 Lane Freeway & Traffic Completion Date: 09/ 07 Management System CSJ Number: 73 8 134 Federal Cost: $ 225,000 Project ID: 3175 State Cost: $ 25,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 37 Project Cost: $ 250,000 Limit From: Fair Ave. S Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: SPRR Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Refurbish signs Completion Date: 11/ 03 CSJ Number: 73 8 140 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3276 State Cost: $ 489,200 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: US 281 Project Cost: $ 489,200 Limit From: Rhapsody Drive Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: IH 410 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, & Pavement Completion Date: 08/ 03 Markings CSJ Number: 73 9 24 Federal Cost: $ 72,000 Project ID: 3176 State Cost: $ 8,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 37 Project Cost: $ 80,000 Limit From: SPRR Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: Loop 1604 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Refurbish signs Completion Date: 11/ 03 K 53 CSJ Number: 143 1 53 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3333 State Cost: $ 1,500,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: US 87 Project Cost: $ 1,500,000 Limit From: FM 1516 Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: FM 1628 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Base repair, surface treatment, overlay, Completion Date: 09/ 03 pavement markings CSJ Number: 143 2 22 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3334 State Cost: $ 693,400 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: US 87 Project Cost: $ 693,400 Limit From: FM 1628 Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: Loop 1604 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Base repair & ACP overlay Completion Date: 09/ 03 CSJ Number: 253 4 119 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3277 State Cost: $ 476,400 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: US 281 Project Cost: $ 476,400 Limit From: Bitters Road Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: Rhapsody Drive Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, & Pavement Completion Date: 08/ 03 Markings CSJ Number: 253 4 124 Federal Cost: Project ID: 3299 State Cost: $ 200,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 400,000 Roadway Name: US 281 Project Cost: $ 600,000 Limit From: At Borgfeld, Bulverde, Wilderness Oaks, Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: and Stone Oak Roads Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Signalizing intersections and traffic Completion Date: 12/ 03 operations CSJ Number: 291 9 125 Federal Cost: $ 180,000 K 54 Project ID: 3250 State Cost: $ 20,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: SH 16 Project Cost: $ 200,000 Limit From: 0.1 Mi N of Chimney Creek Road Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: 0.1 Mi S of Chimney Creek Road Funding Category: 11  Distr Discretionary Project Description: Install median barrier Completion Date: 08/ 03 CSJ Number: 470 2 10 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3336 State Cost: $ 27,600 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: FM 1863 Project Cost: $ 27,600 Limit From: Comal County Line Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: Comal County Line Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: ACP overlay and pavement markings Completion Date: 12/ 03 CSJ Number: 521 1 40 Federal Cost: $ 4,610,236 Project ID: 1050 State Cost: $ 1,152,559 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: W. W. White Rd. ( Loop 13) Project Cost: $ 5,762,795 Limit From: Seale Road Let Date: 10/ 02 Limit To: IH 10 Funding Category: 7  Metro Mobility Project Description: Widen existing 4 lane road to 4 lanes Completion Date: 08/ 04 w/ cont. left turn, sidewalks and drainage CSJ Number: 521 4 243 Federal Cost: $ 129,150 Project ID: 3177 State Cost: $ 14,350 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 410 Project Cost: $ 143,500 Limit From: US 90 Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: Callaghan Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Refurbish Signs Completion Date: 05/ 03 CSJ Number: 521 4 251 Federal Cost: $ 90,000 Project ID: 3186 State Cost: $ 10,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 410 Project Cost: $ 100,000 Limit From: On westbound frontage Rd at Ingram Rd Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Widen existing pavement to provide Completion Date: 07/ 03 K 55 right turn lane CSJ Number: 521 4 253 Federal Cost: $ 492,750 Project ID: 3188 State Cost: $ 54,750 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 410 Project Cost: $ 547,500 Limit From: NB and SB frontage Rd from US 90 Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: SH 151 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Planing, seal coat, asphaltic overlay, Completion Date: 08/ 03 & pavement markings CSJ Number: 521 5 116 Federal Cost: $ 50,850 Project ID: 3178 State Cost: $ 5,650 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: IH 410 Project Cost: $ 56,500 Limit From: 2.6 MI S of Valley Hi Dr, N Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: US 90 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Refurbish Signs Completion Date: 05/ 03 CSJ Number: 849 1 39 Federal Cost: $ 753,012 Project ID: 3124 State Cost: $ 188,253 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Grissom/ Culebra ( FM 471) Project Cost: $ 941,265 Limit From: SH 16 Let Date: 08/ 03 Limit To: Loop 1604 Funding Category: 7  Metro Mobility Project Description: Construct sidewalks ( East side of Completion Date: 08/ 04 roadway only)

CSJ Number: 849 1 40 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3270 State Cost: $ 1,378,500 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Culebra Rd ( FM 471) Project Cost: $ 1,378,500 Limit From: SH 16 Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: Loop 1604 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, & Pavement Completion Date: 10/ 03 Markings CSJ Number: 915 0 82 Federal Cost: $ 160,000 K 56 Project ID: 3273 State Cost: $ 40,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Various Locations Project Cost: $ 200,000 Limit From: DISTRICTWIDE Let Date: 10/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Thermoplastic Re striping ( FY2002)   Completion Date: 10/ 03 Cat 10A CSJ Number: 915 0 94 Federal Cost: $ 760,000 Project ID: 3345 State Cost: $ 190,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Districtwide Traffic Management ( FY 2 Project Cost: $ 950,000 Limit From: Various Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To:  Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Districtwide Traffic Management Completion Date: 08/ 03 ( FY 2002)

CSJ Number: 915 0 98 Federal Cost: $ 480,000 Project ID: 3292 State Cost: $ 120,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Districtwide Project Cost: $ 600,000 Limit From: Non site specific ( 2001) Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Districtwide traffic signals ( 2001) Completion Date: 08/ 04 CSJ Number: 915 12 172 Federal Cost: $ 2,297,647 Project ID: 546 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 574,412 Roadway Name: Houston St. Project Cost: $ 2,872,059 Limit From: Bowie Let Date: 12/ 02 Limit To: Pine Funding Category: 7  Metro Mobility Project Description: Reconstruct Existing Street Completion Date: 12/ 04 CSJ Number: 915 12 231 Federal Cost: $ 1,520,800 Project ID: 979 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 380,200 Roadway Name: Bitters Project Cost: $ 1,901,000 Limit From: East of West Ave ( W. of US 281) Let Date: 06/ 03 Limit To: East of Heimer ( E. of US 281) Funding Category: 7  Metro Mobility Project Description: Widen narrow pavement for turn lanes Completion Date: 01/ 05 K 57 ( signals)

CSJ Number: 915 12 281 Federal Cost: $ 2,412,800 Project ID: 2062 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 603,200 Roadway Name: Southcross Blvd. Project Cost: $ 3,016,000 Limit From: S. New Braunfels Let Date: 06/ 03 Limit To: S. Presa St. Funding Category: 7  Metro Mobility Project Description: Reconstruct & expand from 2 to 4 lanes Completion Date: 01/ 05 ( curbs, sidewalks, signals)

CSJ Number: 915 12 323 Federal Cost: $ 8,000 Project ID: 3033 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 2,000 Roadway Name: Bicycle Route Street Map Project Cost: $ 10,000 Limit From: City Wide Let Date: 12/ 02 Limit To: Funding Category: 7  Metro Mobility Project Description: Map delineating existing bicycle facilities Completion Date: 07/ 03 CSJ Number: 915 12 328 Federal Cost: $ 1,644,962 Project ID: 3041 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 411,241 Roadway Name: Isom Project Cost: $ 2,056,203 Limit From: Ramsey Let Date: 12/ 02 Limit To: US 281 Funding Category: 7  Metro Mobility Project Description: Reconstruct & widen narrow pavement Completion Date: 07/ 04 w/ CLTL ( sidewalks, drainage)

CSJ Number: 915 12 370 Federal Cost: $ 165,309 Project ID: 3146 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 41,327 Roadway Name: Alamo Area Commute Solutions Prog. Project Cost: $ 206,636 Limit From: In San Antonio Bexar Co. Area Let Date: 08/ 03 Limit To: Funding Category: 7  Metro Mobility Project Description: Operational costs for air quality program, Completion Date: 08/ 04 ridematching and carpool services K 58 CSJ Number: 915 12 406 Federal Cost: $ 153,000 Project ID: 3371 State Cost: $ 17,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Benton City Road Project Cost: $ 170,000 Limit From: @ UPRR DOT 764273E  2002 FED RR Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: Funding Category: 8  Safety Project Description: Upgrade RR Crossing Warning Devices Completion Date: 10/ 03 CSJ Number: 1437 1 28 Federal Cost: Project ID: 3204 State Cost: $ 2,757,300 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Houston St. ( FM 1346) Project Cost: $ 2,757,300 Limit From: FM 1516 Let Date: 05/ 03 Limit To: LP 1604 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Rehab & widen narrow pavement & Completion Date: 08/ 05 shoulder CSJ Number: 1741 2 27 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3278 State Cost: $ 369,800 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: FM 2790 Project Cost: $ 369,800 Limit From: Loop 1604 Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: Medina River Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, & Pavement Completion Date: 12/ 03 Markings CSJ Number: 2104 2 26 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3279 State Cost: $ 741,800 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Potranco Rd. ( FM 1957) Project Cost: $ 741,800 Limit From: Bexar/ Medina County Line Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: Loop 1604 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, & Pavement Completion Date: 12/ 03 Markings CSJ Number: 2452 2 68 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3280 State Cost: $ 1,431,900 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Loop 1604 Project Cost: $ 1,431,900 K 59 Limit From: IH 10 ( EBFR & WBFR) Let Date: 01/ 03 Limit To: US 281 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Seal Coat, ACP Overlay, & Pavement Completion Date: 08/ 03 Markings CSJ Number: 2452 2 69 Federal Cost: $ 179,460 Project ID: 3251 State Cost: $ 19,940 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Loop 1604 Project Cost: $ 199,400 Limit From: Kyle Seale Parkway Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: BabcocK Funding Category: 11  Distr Discretionary Project Description: Install median barrier Completion Date: 08/ 03 CSJ Number: 2452 3 91 Federal Cost: $ 0 Project ID: 3272 State Cost: $ 672,000 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Loop 1604 Project Cost: $ 672,000 Limit From: Lower Seguin Road Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: IH 10 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Spot Base Repair & Overlay Completion Date: 12/ 03 CSJ Number: 2452 3 92 Federal Cost: $ 179,460 Project ID: 3252 State Cost: $ 19,940 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Loop 1604 Project Cost: $ 199,400 Limit From: Green Mountain Road Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: UPRR Overpass Funding Category: 11  Distr Discretionary Project Description: Install median barrier Completion Date: 08/ 03 CSJ Number: 2452 4 9 Federal Cost: Project ID: 3257 State Cost: $ 565,900 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Loop 1604 Project Cost: $ 565,900 Limit From: FM 1518 Let Date: 09/ 02 Limit To: US 87 Funding Category: 1  Prvnt Mnt/ Rehab Project Description: Rehabilitation & widen narrow pavement Completion Date: 12/ 03 & shoulders K 60 CSJ Number: 5000 0 32 Federal Cost: $ 5,625,000 Project ID: 3406 State Cost: $ 0 County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 0 Roadway Name: Austin San Antonio Corridor Projects Project Cost: $ 5,625,000 Limit From: Let Date: Limit To: Funding Category: 2 Metro Corridor Project Description: Proposed Engineering & Analytical Completion Date: Studies San Antonio Bexar Metropolitan Area TIP Completed FY 2003 Transit Projects CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 7,848,428 Project ID: 9001 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 1,962,107 Project Name: Revenue Vehicles Total Cost: $ 9,810,535 Project Description: Purchase Replacement Low Floor Buses Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 73,936 Project ID: 9005 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 18,484 Project Name: Non Revenue Vehicles Total Cost: $ 92,420 Project Description: Purchase Service Vehicles Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 1,858,860 Project ID: 9007 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 464,715 Project Name: Facility Rehabilitation Total Cost: $ 2,323,575 Project Description: PE, final design, construction Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 172,000 Project ID: 9011 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 43,000 Project Name: Passenger Facilities Total Cost: $ 215,000 Project Description: Bus Stop Improvements Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 156,000 K 61 Project ID: 9012 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 39,000 Project Name: Equipment Total Cost: $ 195,000 Project Description: MIS Hardware Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 224,000 Project ID: 9013 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 56,000 Project Name: Equipment Total Cost: $ 280,000 Project Description: MIS Software Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies CSJ Number: N/ A Federal Cost: $ 51,648 Project ID: 9015 State Cost: N/ A County: Bexar Local Cost: $ 12,912 Project Name: Equipment Total Cost: $ 64,560 Project Description: Miscellaneous Equipment Let Date: Varies Funding Category: Section 5307 Completion Date: Varies K 62 Traffic Resignalization Emission Reduction Estimates Of many projects shown in the MPO's TIP in this appendix, certain traffic signals for various intersections in the Bexar County have been separately evaluated for their impacts on the air quality and included in the Chapter 8 of the 2003 UPWP report. The results of this analysis would provide additional evidence indicating future lower ozone levels for the San Antonio area. The following pages present this evaluation.

Introduction Traffic flow improvements have been used for air quality planning due to their ability to reduce traffic congestion, reducing congestion related emissions, and are also a costeffective method of reducing congestion and emissions. 1 Arterial management systems manage traffic by employing various detection and control devices along arterial roadways.

Traffic signalization is one of the most common traffic management techniques utilized in the United States. Signal control systems are methods of arterial roadway management is practiced because such control systems improve traffic flow as well as simplify system maintenance. 2 Some improvements can include: Updating traffic signal hardware to utilize more modern technology, allowing for more sophisticated traffic flow strategies to be planned; Timing traffic signals to correspond with current traffic flows, reducing unnecessary delays; Coordinating and interconnecting signals to better interface pre timed and traffic actuated signals, actively managed timing plans, and master controllers to minimize the number and frequency of stops necessary at intersections; and Removing signals at intersections no longer requiring signalized stop control to reduce vehicle delays and unwarranted stops on the major street. 1 The use of flexible traffic signal systems has been used since the early 1960' s when computerized systems began to come into existence. Signalization projects can reduce carbon monoxide ( CO) and hydrocarbon ( HC) by reducing the number of vehicular stops and idling, which would reduce travel times and traffic delays. Reductions in fuel consumption have also been observed through traffic signal re timing. Traffic flow at intersections can be improved in interconnection and coordination of signals.

Resignalization in Bexar County The prospect of traffic signal retiming has been evaluated for various intersections in Bexar County in order to efficiently deal with the existing levels of traffic volumes. A program was recently conducted for Bexar County, as it is recommended that traffic signal timing patterns be checked and updated every 5 to 7 years. Such programs focus on three factors: 1) public benefit from improved traffic operation, 2) the inherent costeffectiveness of operations improvements, and 3) establishing a baseline for measuring effectiveness in future re timing projects.

1 MOSERS Handbook, June 2003. Texas Department of Transportation 2 Miretek Systems, " Intelligent Transportation Systems Benefits: 2001 Update." Federal Highway Administration, June 2001. K 63 Approximately seven traffic signal systems were assessed as to their benefit and functionality in handling traffic volume within the San Antonio area. Table K 8 1 lists the systems that were analyzed during the months of May 2001 to November 2001.

Table K 22. Traffic Signal Systems Evaluated Traffic Signal Systems Wetmore System Bandera System Jones Maltsberger System Rittiman System Bitters/ West System Nacogdoches/ Perrin Beitel System Eisenhauer System Traffic Signal Evaluation The evaluation of the selected traffic signal systems involved several steps. Traffic light systems in the San Antonio area were evaluated bv Pape Dawson Engineers, Inc. The evaluation involved collection of data, design improvements, optimal timing plan development and implementation, and simulation of before and after conditions. Several models were used in the evaluation and assessment of the traffic signal systems. These models included TRANSYT 7F, Synchro 3.2, and PASSER II.

Information on arterial data, " before" signal timing data, saturation flow rates, and speed/ travel time data were gathered through various sources. Traffic volumes, which are the numbers of vehicles that pass a specific point during a given period of time, were collected at the intersections. 3 Lane configuration, link speed data, and link distance information were provided by the City of San Antonio. The data gathered for model input was first run through Synchro 3.2 to produce a simulation file. The file was calibrated to reflect specific " before" conditions and then converted to a TRANSYT 7F file. The TRANSYT 7F analyzed the traffic system and produced a " before" traffic flow simulation.

The simulation data originally provided by Synchro 3.2 was then modified to reflect optimal time cycles for improved efficiency. PASSER II analyzed alternative phasing arrangements and cycle lengths. The cycle lengths that generated the least amount of delay were deemed most efficient and thus recommended. The following sections describe the arterial intersections that were analyzed and the recommended timing plans.

Wetmore System The Wetmore System is located on Wetmore Road, which is classified as a primary arterial, Type A. In evaluating this system, three timing plans were developed for the A. M Peak, Midday/ Off Peak, and P. M. Peak periods. Four intersections were analyzed on the Wetmore System and their operation is detailed in Table K 8 2.4 3 " Detection Technology: For IVHS Volume 1: Final Report Addendum." July 1995. http:// ntl. bts. gov/ DOCS/ 96100/ ch02/ body_ ch02_ 03. html 4 Traffic Signal Re Timing Study, " Wetmore System Technical Memorandum." Pape Dawsom Engineers, May 2001. K 64 Table K 23. Intersections Evaluated for Traffic Signal Re Timing on Wetmore Rd.

Signalization Details Before Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Wetmore Rd. & Ridge Country Coordinated 4 Wetmore Rd. & Gunn Sports Park Coordinated 4 Wetmore Rd. & Wurzbach Pkwy West Coordinated 4 Wetmore Rd. & Wurzbach Pkwy East Coordinated 4 After Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Wetmore Rd. & Ridge Country Coordinated 4 Wetmore Rd. & Gunn Sports Park Coordinated 4 Wetmore Rd. & Wurzbach Pkwy West Coordinated 4 Wetmore Rd. & Wurzbach Pkwy East Coordinated 4 The Wetmore System was evaluated as described in Traffic Signal Evaluation. Analysis of the evaluation provided cycles that would improve efficiency in a number of areas. These areas include bandwidth efficiency, vehicle delay, and fuel consumption.

The 115 second cycle for the AM peak hour was selected since it provided the best bandwidth efficiency, largest bands for northbound and southbound traffic, and had a lower delay value. The 75 second cycle for off peak hours is the lowest delay for the arterial. The 80 second cycle for the PM peak hour had a high bandwidth efficiency, lowest delay, and the lowest fuel consumption.

Eisenhauer System The Eisenhauer System is located on Eisenhauer Road and is designated as a secondary arterial, Type A, east of Interstate 35 and Type B, west of Interstate 35. Three timing plans were developed for the A. M. Peak, Midday/ Off Peak, and P. M. Peak periods. Nine intersections were evaluated, as listed in Table K 8 3.5 Table K 24. Evaluated Intersections on Eisenhauer Rd Signalization Details Before Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Eisenhauer and Corrine Uncoordinated 2 Eisenhauer and Holbrook Uncoordinated 2 Eisenhauer and Harlow Uncoordinated 2 Eisenhauer and Kingston Uncoordinated 2 Eisenhauer and Molokai Uncoordinated 2 Eisenhauer and Interstate 35 Diamond Uncoordinated TTI 4 Phase 5 Traffic Signal Re Timing Study, " Eisenhauer System Technical Memorandum." Pape Dawsom Engineers, November 2001. K 65 Eisenhauer and Fratt Uncoordinated 5 Eisenhauer and Ray Bon Uncoordinated 8 Eisenhauer and Mid Crown Uncoordinated 6 After Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Eisenhauer and Corrine Coordinated 2 Eisenhauer and Holbrook Coordinated 2 Eisenhauer and Harlow Coordinated 2 Eisenhauer and Kingston Coordinated 2 Eisenhauer and Molokai Coordinated 2 Eisenhauer and Interstate 35 Diamond Coordinated TTI 4 Phase Eisenhauer and Fratt Coordinated 5/ 2 Eisenhauer and Ray Bon Coordinated 8/ 2 Eisenhauer and Mid Crown Coordinated 6/ 2 The Eisenhauer System was evaluated as described in Traffic Signal Evaluation. Analysis of the evaluation provided cycles that would improve efficiency in a number of areas. These areas include bandwidth efficiency, vehicle delay, and fuel consumption. The AM peak hour's cycle was chosen to be 120 seconds since it provided the best bandwidth efficiency and largest bands for northbound and southbound traffic. The cycle also coincided with low values of delay and low fuel consumption. The 90 second cycle was recommended for the system during off peak hours. This cycle provided the lowest delay at the I 35 diamond interchange.

Bitters/ West System The Bitters/ West System is located on Bitters Road and West Avenue. Bitters Road is a Type A secondary arterial. West Avenue is a Type A arterial and meets Bitters. Three timing plans were developed for the A. M. Peak, Midday/ Off Peak, and P. M. Peak periods. Six intersections were evaluated, as listed in Table K 8 4.6 Table K 25. Intersections Evaluated for Traffic Signal Re Timing on Bitters/ West Signalization Details Before Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Bitters Road and Heimer Road Uncoordinated 7 Bitters Road and US 281 Uncoordinated TTI 4 Phase Bitters Road and Embassy Row Uncoordinated 4 Bitters Road and West Avenue Uncoordinated 5 West Avenue and Embassy Oaks Uncoordinated 2 West Avenue and Interpark Blvd Uncoordinated 4 After Conditions 6 Traffic Signal Re Timing Study, " Bitters/ West System Technical Memorandum." Pape Dawsom Engineers, October 2001. K 66 Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Bitters Road and Heimer Road Uncoordinated 7 Bitters Road and US 281 Uncoordinated TTI 4 Phase Bitters Road and Embassy Row Uncoordinated 4 Bitters Road and West Avenue Uncoordinated 5 West Avenue and Embassy Oaks Uncoordinated 2 West Avenue and Interpark Blvd Uncoordinated 4 The Bitters/ West System was evaluated as described in Traffic Signal Evaluation. Analysis of the evaluation provided cycles that would improve efficiency in a number of areas. These areas include bandwidth efficiency, vehicle delay, and fuel consumption.

The best cycle for the A. M. peak hour was 108 seconds. It provided the best bandwidth efficiency and low delay. A cycle length of 90 seconds for off peak hours yielded low delay but were the lowest in effectiveness of all categories. For P. M. peak hours, the 120 second cycle length provided high bandwidth efficiency, low fuel consumption, and low delay values.

Bandera System The Bandera System is on Bandera Road, which is designated as a primary arterial, Type A. The lanes on Bandera Road vary from six lanes with exclusive left turn lanes to a four lane roadway with exclusive right and left turn lanes. Three timing plans were developed for the A. M. Peak, Midday/ Off peak, and P. M. Peak periods. Eight intersections were evaluated on Bandera Road, as listed in Table K 8 5.7 Table K 26: Intersections Evaluated for Traffic Signal Re Timing on Bandera Rd Signalization Details Before Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Bandera and Prue/ Tezel Coordinated 6 Bandera and Old Prue/ Camino Villa Coordinated 6 Bandera and Braun Coordinated 5 Bandera and Mystic Park/ Bresnahan Coordinated 6 Bandera and Guilbeau/ Bristle Cone Coordinated 6 Bandera and Mainland Coordinated 6 Bandera and Eckhert Coordinated 6 Gilbeau and Mystic Park Free/ Coordinated 3 After Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Bandera and Prue/ Tezel Coordinated 6 Bandera and Old Prue/ Camino Villa Coordinated 6 7 Traffic Signal Re Timing Study, " Bandera System Technical Memorandum." Pape Dawsom Engineers, June 2001. K 67 Bandera and Braun Coordinated 5 Bandera and Mystic Park/ Bresnahan Coordinated 6 Bandera and Guilbeau/ Bristle Cone Coordinated 6 Bandera and Mainland Coordinated 6 Bandera and Eckhert Coordinated 6 Gilbeau and Mystic Park Coordinated 3 The Bandera System was evaluated as described in Traffic Signal Evaluation. Analysis of the evaluation provided cycles that would improve efficiency in a number of areas. These areas include bandwidth efficiency, vehicle delay, and fuel consumption.

For the A. M. peak hour, a cycle of 130 seconds was chosen due to good bandwidth efficiencies. The 90 second cycle was recommended for off peak hours since it provided a low delay time. The P. M. peak hour was recommended the 130 second cycle length due to high bandwidth efficiency, low delay, and low fuel consumption.

Rittiman System Rittiman Road is designated a secondary arterial, Type A east of I 35 and Type B, west of I 35. Rittiman road is a four lane roadway with a diamond interchange at the intersection with Interstate 35. Three timing plans were developed for the A. M. Peak, Midday/ Off peak, and P. M. Peak periods. Table K 8 6 lists the five intersections that were evaluated on this system. 8 Table K 27. Intersections Evaluated for Traffic Signal Re Timing on Rittiman Signalization Details Before Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Rittiman Rd and Rittiman Plaza Uncoordinated 2 Rittiman Rd and Fairdale Uncoordinated 2 Rittiman Rd and IH 35 Diamond Uncoordinated TTI 4 Phase Rittiman Rd and Goldfield Uncoordinated 2 Rittiman Rd and Fratt/ Business Park Uncoordinated 8 After Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Rittiman Rd and Rittiman Plaza Coordinated 2 Rittiman Rd and Fairdale Coordinated 2 Rittiman Rd and IH 35 Diamond Coordinated TTI 4 Phase Rittiman Rd and Goldfield Coordinated 2 Rittiman Rd and Fratt/ Business Park Coordinated 8 8 Traffic Signal Re Timing Study, " Rittiman System Technical Memorandum." Pape Dawsom Engineers, November 2001. K 68 The Rittiman System was evaluated as described in Traffic Signal Evaluation. Analysis of the evaluation provided cycles that would improve efficiency in a number of areas. These areas include bandwidth efficiency, vehicle delay, and fuel consumption.

For the A. M. peak hour, the 120 second cycle was bandwidth efficient and had the lowest delay values. The 90 second cycle for the off peak period allows low delay at the diamond interchange as well as along the arterial. The 120 second cycle was also recommended for the PM peak hour due to it high bandwidth efficiency, low delay, and low fuel consumption.

Jones Maltsberger System Jones Maltsberger is a secondary arterial, Type A and has four lanes. Three timing plans were developed for the A. M. Peak, Off Peak, and P. M. Peak periods. Five intersections were evaluated on Jones Maltsberger, which are listed on Table K 8 7.9 Table K 28. Intersections Evaluated for Traffic Signal Re Timing on Jones Maltsberger Signalization Details Before Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Jones Maltsberger and Starcrest Free 8 Jones Maltsberger and Perennial/ Budding Free 6 Jones Maltsberger and Money Tree Free 5 Jones Maltsberger and Burning Trail Free 5 Jones Maltsberger and Thousand Oaks Free 8 After Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Jones Maltsberger and Starcrest Coordinated 8 Jones Maltsberger and Perennial/ Budding Coordinated 6 Jones Maltsberger and Money Tree Coordinated 5 Jones Maltsberger and Burning Trail Coordinated 5 Jones Maltsberger and Thousand Oaks Coordinated 8 The Jones Maltsberger System was evaluated as described in Traffic Signal Evaluation. Analysis of the evaluation provided cycles that would improve efficiency in a number of areas. These areas include bandwidth efficiency, vehicle delay, and fuel consumption.

The best cycle for the A. M. peak period was one that consisted of 90 seconds since it had the best bandwidth efficiency and low delay. A cycle of 120 seconds was optimal for off peak. A good candidate for the P. M. peak period would be a cycle of 115 seconds since it had good bandwidth efficiency, low fuel consumption, and low delay values.

Nacogdoches/ Perrin Beitel System 9 Traffic Signal Re Timing Study, " Jones Maltsberger System Technical Memorandum." Pape Dawsom Engineers, May 2001. K 69 Both Nacogdoches and Perrin Beitel are Type A secondary arterial, each being a fourlane roadway. Twenty intersections were evaluated on the Nacogdoches/ Perrin Beitel system, as detailed on Table K 8 8. Three timing plans were developed for the A. M. Peak, Off Peak, and P. M. Peak periods. 10 Table K 29: Intersections Evaluated for Traffic Signal Re Timing on Nacogdoches/ Perrin Beitel Signalization Details Before Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Nacogdoches and Topperwien Coordinated 4 Nacogdoches and Judson Coordinated 8 Nacogdoches and Dreamwood Coordinated 3 Nacogdoches and O'Connor Coordinated 8 Nacogdoches and El Charro Coordinated 2/ 3* Nacogdoches and Higgins Coordinated 3 Nacogdoches and El Sendero Coordinated 4 Nacogdoches and Bell Coordinated 3 Nacogdoches and Leonhardt Coordinated 5 Nacogdoches and Thousand Oaks Coordinated 8 Perrin Beitel and Naco Perrin Coordinated 6 Perrin Bietel and El Sendero Coordinated 3 Perrin Beitel and Wurzbach Parkway Coordinated TTI 4 Phase Perrin Beitel and Perrin Central Coordinated 5 Perrin Beitel and Post Office Coordinated 3 Perrin Beitel and Clear Spring Coordinated 3 Perrin Beitel and Comstock Coordinated 5 Perrin Beitel and Center Gate Coordinated 3 Thousand Oaks and Bulverde Coordinated 5 Thousand Oaks and Uhr Coordinated 2 After Conditions Intersection Name Operation No. of Phases Nacogdoches and Topperwien Coordinated 4 Nacogdoches and Judson Coordinated 8 Nacogdoches and Dreamwood Coordinated 3 Nacogdoches and O'Connor Coordinated 8 Nacogdoches and El Charro Coordinated 2/ 3* Nacogdoches and Higgins Coordinated 3 Nacogdoches and El Sendero Coordinated 4 Nacogdoches and Bell Coordinated 3 Nacogdoches and Leonhardt Coordinated 5 Nacogdoches and Thousand Oaks Coordinated 8 Perrin Beitel and Naco Perrin Coordinated 6 Perrin Beitel and El Sendero Coordinated 3 10 Traffic Signal Re Timing Study, " Nacogdoches/ Perrin Beitel System Technical Memorandum." Pape Dawsom Engineers, November 2001. K 70 Perrin Beitel and Wurzbach Parkway Coordinated TTI 4 Phase Perrin Beitel and Perrin Central Coordinated 5 Perrin Beitel and Post Office Coordinated 3 Perrin Bietel and Clear Spring Coordinated 3 Perrin Beitel and Comstock Coordinated 5 Perrin Beitel and Center Gate Coordinated 3 Thousand Oaks and Bulverde Coordinated 5 Thousand Oaks and Uhr Coordinated 2 The Nacogdoches/ Perrin Beitel System was evaluated as described in Traffic Signal Evaluation. Analysis of the evaluation provided cycles that would improve efficiency in a number of areas. These areas include bandwidth efficiency, vehicle delay, and fuel consumption.

The 90 second cycle for the AM peak hour was selected since it provided the one of the best bandwidth efficiencies, large bands for northbound and southbound traffic, and lowest combination of delay values. Off peak period was recommended the 90 second cycle. It presented the lowest delay and low fuel consumption. The 130 second cycle length for PM peak hour had high bandwidth efficiency, low delay, and low fuel consumption.

In summary, the traffic signal systems included in this study were recommended to have cycle lengths reduced while maintaining efficient bandwidth, reduced vehicle delays, and reduced fuel consumption. Table K 8 9 details the various traffic signal systems included in the study as well as data on vehicle stop frequency, vehicle delay, and fuel consumption. K 71 Table K 30. Traffic Signal System Statistics before & with Recommended Improvements Stops Total System Delay Fuel Consumption Traffic Signal System Number of Hours Before After Before After Before After AM 2.33 7814 6244 61 37 221 190 Off Peak 7.5 3040 2550 20 14 105 94 Wetmore PM 2 4471 4510 32 26 166 160 AM 2 17195 14734 677 525 773 655 Off Peak 7 13207 2787 112 24 331 81 Eisenhauer PM 2 18224 14552 543 384 725 585 AM 2 16464 12664 329 281 454 431 Off Peak 7 14761 15872 613 472 620 600 Bitters/ West PM 2 40344 22853 2463 868 2065 979 AM 1.25 31743 24221 834 724 1474 1300 Off Peak 6.5 17108 14290 132 110 732 624 Bandera PM 3.75 60293 29076 3640 738 3625 1406 AM 2 19116 11822 702 412 1192 552 Off Peak 7 7048 5270 55 40 222 203 Rittiman PM 2 17651 15939 1380 663 1295 759 AM 2 8356 8069 82 66 381 334 Off Peak 7 6697 6168 71 64 314 283 Jones Maltsberger PM 2 14926 11797 246 175 596 487 AM 1.5 25721 22211 201 179 834 783 Off Peak 7 23273 21934 163 157 801 785 Nacogdoches/ P errin Beitel PM 3 47198 37977 793 760 1626 1513 On Road Emission Reduction According to the 1999 AACOG Emission Inventory, on road sources provides a substantial amount of VOC and NOx emissions to Bexar County. The 2007 projection of the September photochemical modeling episode accounts for the updated MOBILE6 on road emissions and it is against these emissions that the proposed traffic signal timing cycle improvements were performance evaluated. Average weekday ( Monday Friday) emissions for on road sources in Bexar County are 61 tons/ day of NOx and 49 tons/ day of VOC11.