Combined Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large Cafos Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 91 54 52 46 50 N/ A 52 52 Dairy 40 29 28 25 27 N/ A 28 27 Swine 80 80 79 70 N/ A 96 77 73 Poultry 124 101 100 100 100 N/ A 100 100 Poultry ( wet) 32 31 31 30 N/ A 21 31 31 Total 367 295 290 270 176 117 288 283 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 80 68 62 62 62 N/ A 62 62 Dairy 14 12 11 11 10 N/ A 10 10 Swine 20 20 17 17 N/ A 14 16 16 Poultry 52 46 39 39 39 N/ A 39 39 Poultry ( wet) 9 9 8 8 N/ A 6 8 8 Total 176 155 138 138 111 20 136 136 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 11339 10138 10138 10138 10113 N/ A 10138 10138 Dairy 1856 1757 1757 1757 1749 N/ A 1748 1749 Swine 2937 2937 2824 2824 N/ A 2823 2824 2823 Poultry 10996 10965 10824 10824 10824 N/ A 10824 10824 Poultry ( wet) 885 885 877 877 N/ A 787 877 877 Total 28013 26682 26419 26419 22686 3611 26410 26411 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 422 412 411 411 162 N/ A 411 411 Dairy 54 53 53 53 22 N/ A 19 30 Swine 139 138 138 138 N/ A 1 1 2 Poultry 7 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 57 56 56 56 N/ A 0 56 56 Total 678 659 659 659 184 1 489 500 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 193 187 187 187 72 N/ A 187 187 Dairy 212 206 206 206 86 N/ A 10 72 Swine 4095 4082 4081 4081 N/ A 35 41 75 Poultry 450 26 26 26 0 N/ A 26 26 Poultry ( wet) 121 121 121 121 N/ A 0 121 121 Total 5070 4621 4620 4620 158 35 385 480 Table A 7. Fecal streptococcus loads from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units. Table A 3. Nitrogen loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 4. Phosphorous loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 5. Sediment loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 6. Fecal coliform loads from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units. Combined Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large Cafos Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.6 N/ A 2.6 2.6 Dairy 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 N/ A 2.3 2.3 Swine 3.5 3.5 3.4 3.4 N/ A 3.7 3.4 3.3 Poultry 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.4 9.4 N/ A 9.4 9.4 Poultry ( wet) 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.3 N/ A 1.1 1.3 1.3 Total 20.0 19.5 19.0 19.0 14.3 4.9 19.0 19.0 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 7 7 7 7 4 N/ A 7 7 Dairy 3 3 3 3 2 N/ A 1 1 Swine 7 7 7 7 N/ A 0 1 0 Poultry 6 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 13 13 13 13 N/ A 0 13 13 Total 37 31 31 31 6 0 22 22 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 36.6 38.8 45.2 41.2 N/ A 38.8 38.8 Dairy 11.4 11.9 15.1 12.9 N/ A 12.4 13.0 Swine 0.3 0.7 10.2 N/ A ( 16.1) 2.6 7.0 Poultry 23.9 24.9 24.9 24.9 N/ A 24.9 24.9 Poultry ( wet) 0.7 0.6 2.3 N/ A 11.0 0.6 0.6 Total 72.9 77.0 97.8 79.1 ( 5.0) 79.3 84.3 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 11.8 17.5 17.5 18.1 N/ A 17.5 17.5 Dairy 2.4 3.8 3.8 4.1 N/ A 4.1 4.1 Swine 0.1 3.1 3.1 N/ A 6.5 4.0 4.4 Poultry 6.5 12.7 12.7 12.7 N/ A 12.7 12.7 Poultry ( wet) 0.2 1.2 1.2 N/ A 3.4 1.2 1.2 Total 20.9 38.3 38.3 34.9 9.9 39.4 39.9 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 1200.8 1200.8 1200.8 1225.6 N/ A 1200.8 1200.9 Dairy 99.3 99.4 99.4 106.6 N/ A 108.2 106.7 Swine 0.0 112.8 112.8 N/ A 113.4 113.3 113.4 Poultry 31.2 172.4 172.4 172.4 N/ A 172.4 172.4 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 8.5 8.5 N/ A 98.0 8.5 8.5 Total 1331.4 1594.0 1594.0 1504.5 211.4 1603.3 1601.8 Table A 9. Nitrogen load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values.

Table A 10. Phosphorous load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 11. Sediment load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values. Table A 8. Metals loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A X. BOD loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Combined Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large Cafos Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 10.5 10.6 10.6 260.4 N/ A 10.6 11.1 Dairy 1.0 1.0 1.0 31.4 N/ A 34.3 23.9 Swine 0.4 0.4 0.4 N/ A 137.8 137.4 136.5 Poultry 6.7 6.7 6.7 7.2 N/ A 6.7 6.7 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 56.5 0.0 0.0 Total 18.7 18.7 18.7 299.0 194.3 189.0 178.2 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 5.6 5.6 5.6 120.4 N/ A 5.6 5.9 Dairy 6.8 6.5 6.5 126.4 N/ A 201.8 140.2 Swine 13.7 14.3 14.3 N/ A 4060.5 4054.4 4020.5 Poultry 423.8 423.9 423.9 449.3 N/ A 423.9 423.9 Poultry ( wet) 0.1 0.1 0.1 N/ A 120.5 0.1 0.1 Total 449.9 450.4 450.4 696.1 4180.9 4685.8 4590.5 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 N/ A 0.2 0.2 Dairy 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.2 N/ A 0.2 0.2 Swine 0.0 0.1 0.1 N/ A ( 0.2) 0.1 0.2 Poultry 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 N/ A 0.4 0.4 Poultry ( wet) 0.1 0.1 0.1 N/ A 0.2 0.1 0.1 Total 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.8 ( 0.0) 0.9 1.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 N/ A 2.2 1.8 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 7.4 6.3 7.2 Poultry 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 N/ A 6.0 6.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 13.3 0.0 0.0 Total 6.0 6.0 6.0 10.1 20.7 14.5 15.0 Table A 13. Fecal streptococcus load reductions from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

Table A Y. BOD load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Table A 12. Fecal coliform load reductions from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

Table A 14. Metals load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values. Cropland Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 63 27 24 24 24 N/ A 24 24 Dairy 20 9 8 8 8 N/ A 8 8 Swine 38 38 37 37 N/ A 60 37 37 Poultry 123 101 100 100 100 N/ A 100 100 Poultry ( wet) 14 13 13 13 N/ A 13 13 13 Total 258 187 183 183 132 74 183 183 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 79 67 61 61 61 N/ A 61 61 Dairy 14 12 10 10 10 N/ A 10 10 Swine 19 19 16 16 N/ A 14 16 16 Poultry 51 46 39 39 39 N/ A 39 39 Poultry ( wet) 7 7 6 6 N/ A 6 6 6 Total 170 150 132 132 111 20 132 132 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 11295 10094 10094 10094 10094 N/ A 10094 10094 Dairy 1843 1744 1744 1744 1744 N/ A 1744 1744 Swine 2936 2936 2823 2823 N/ A 2823 2823 2823 Poultry 10965 10965 10824 10824 10824 N/ A 10824 10824 Poultry ( wet) 796 796 787 787 N/ A 787 787 787 Total 27836 26535 26273 26273 22662 3611 26273 26273 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 47 37 36 36 0 N/ A 36 36 Dairy 2 1 1 1 0 N/ A 0 1 Swine 2 1 1 1 N/ A 1 0 1 Poultry 1 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Total 51 39 39 39 0 1 37 39 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 25 19 19 19 0 N/ A 19 19 Dairy 13 6 6 6 0 N/ A 0 6 Swine 58 44 43 43 N/ A 35 0 43 Poultry 44 26 26 26 0 N/ A 26 26 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Total 139 95 94 94 0 35 45 94 Table A 7. Fecal streptococcus loads from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units. Table A 3. Nitrogen loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 4. Phosphorous loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 5. Sediment loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 6. Fecal coliform loads from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

DCTM_ ARP. xls Cropland Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 2.8 2.6 2.6 2.6 2.6 N/ A 2.6 2.6 Dairy 2.5 2.4 2.3 2.3 2.3 N/ A 2.3 2.3 Swine 3.4 3.4 3.3 3.3 N/ A 3.7 3.3 3.3 Poultry 9.8 9.6 9.4 9.4 9.4 N/ A 9.4 9.4 Poultry ( wet) 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.1 N/ A 1.1 1.1 1.1 Total 19.7 19.2 18.8 18.8 14.3 4.9 18.8 18.8 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 36.6 38.8 38.8 38.8 N/ A 38.8 38.8 Dairy 11.4 11.9 11.9 11.9 N/ A 11.9 11.9 Swine 0.27 0.7 0.7 N/ A ( 22.4) 0.7 0.7 Poultry 22.3 23.4 23.4 23.4 N/ A 23.4 23.4 Poultry ( wet) 0.7 0.6 0.6 N/ A 0.6 0.6 0.6 Total 71.3 75.4 75.4 74.1 ( 21.8) 75.4 75.4 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 11.8 17.5 17.5 17.5 N/ A 17.5 17.5 Dairy 2.4 3.8 3.8 3.8 N/ A 3.8 3.8 Swine 0.1 3.1 3.1 N/ A 5.1 3.1 3.1 Poultry 5.9 12.2 12.2 12.2 N/ A 12.2 12.2 Poultry ( wet) 0.2 1.2 1.2 N/ A 1.2 1.2 1.2 Total 20.4 37.8 37.8 33.5 6.3 37.8 37.8 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 1200.8 1200.8 1200.8 1200.8 N/ A 1200.8 1200.8 Dairy 99.3 99.4 99.4 99.4 N/ A 99.4 99.4 Swine 0.0 112.8 112.8 N/ A ( 461.3) 112.8 112.8 Poultry 0.0 141.2 141.2 141.2 N/ A 141.2 141.2 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 8.5 8.5 N/ A 8.5 8.5 8.5 Total 1300.2 1562.7 1562.7 1441.4 ( 452.8) 1562.7 1562.7 Table A 8. Metals loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A X. BOD loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 9. Nitrogen load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values.

Table A 10. Phosphorous load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 11. Sediment load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values.

DCTM_ ARP. xls Cropland Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 10.5 10.6 10.6 46.7 N/ A 10.6 10.6 Dairy 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.9 N/ A 1.9 1.0 Swine 0.4 0.4 0.4 N/ A 0.7 1.7 0.4 Poultry 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.7 N/ A 0.2 0.2 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 12.2 12.2 12.2 49.2 0.7 14.3 12.2 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 5.6 5.6 5.6 24.6 N/ A 5.6 5.6 Dairy 6.8 6.5 6.5 12.7 N/ A 12.7 6.5 Swine 13.7 14.3 14.3 N/ A 23.0 57.3 14.3 Poultry 17.9 18.0 18.0 43.4 N/ A 18.0 18.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.1 0.1 0.1 N/ A 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total 44.0 44.5 44.5 80.6 23.1 93.6 44.5 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 N/ A 0.2 0.2 Dairy 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 N/ A 0.1 0.1 Swine 0.0 0.1 0.1 N/ A ( 0.3) 0.1 0.1 Poultry 0.2 0.4 0.4 0.4 N/ A 0.4 0.4 Poultry ( wet) 0.1 0.1 0.1 N/ A 0.1 0.1 0.1 Total 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.7 ( 0.2) 0.9 0.9 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Table A 13. Fecal streptococcus load reductions from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

Table A Y. BOD load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Table A 12. Fecal coliform load reductions from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

Table A 14. Metals load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values.

DCTM_ ARP. xls Lagoon Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 23 23 23 17 23 N/ A 23 23 Dairy 18 18 18 15 18 N/ A 18 18 Swine 36 36 36 26 N/ A 36 36 36 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 7 7 7 6 N/ A 7 7 7 Total 85 85 85 64 42 43 85 85 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Dairy 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Swine 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Dairy 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Swine 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Dairy 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Swine 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Dairy 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Swine 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Poultry 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table A 7. Fecal streptococcus loads from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units. Table A 3. Nitrogen loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 4. Phosphorous loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 5. Sediment loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 6. Fecal coliform loads from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

DCTM_ ARP. xls Lagoon Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 6.4 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 3.2 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 9.6 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 1.7 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 20.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Table A 9. Nitrogen load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values.

Table A 10. Phosphorous load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 11. Sediment load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values. Table A 8. Metals loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A X. BOD loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

DCTM_ ARP. xls Lagoon Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Table A 13. Fecal streptococcus load reductions from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

Table A Y. BOD load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Table A 12. Fecal coliform load reductions from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

Table A 14. Metals load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values.

DCTM_ ARP. xls Production Area Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 4 4 4 4 2 N/ A 4 4 Dairy 2 2 2 2 1 N/ A 1 1 Swine 6 6 6 6 N/ A 0 4 0 Poultry 2 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 10 10 10 10 N/ A 0 10 10 Total 24 23 23 23 2 0 20 15 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 1 1 1 1 1 N/ A 1 1 Dairy 0 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Swine 1 1 1 1 N/ A 0 0 0 Poultry 1 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 2 2 2 2 N/ A 0 2 2 Total 6 5 5 5 1 0 4 4 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 43 43 43 43 19 N/ A 43 43 Dairy 13 13 13 13 5 N/ A 4 5 Swine 1 1 1 1 N/ A 0 0 0 Poultry 31 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 90 90 90 90 N/ A 0 90 90 Total 177 146 146 146 24 0 137 138 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 375 375 375 375 161 N/ A 375 374 Dairy 52 52 52 52 22 N/ A 19 29 Swine 137 137 137 137 N/ A 0 1 1 Poultry 7 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 56 56 56 56 N/ A 0 56 56 Total 627 620 620 620 183 0 452 461 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 168 168 168 168 72 N/ A 168 168 Dairy 200 200 200 200 86 N/ A 10 66 Swine 4038 4038 4038 4038 N/ A 0 40 31 Poultry 406 0 0 0 0 N/ A 0 0 Poultry ( wet) 120 120 120 120 N/ A 0 120 120 Total 4931 4526 4526 4526 158 0 339 385 Table A 7. Fecal streptococcus loads from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units. Table A 3. Nitrogen loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 4. Phosphorous loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 5. Sediment loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 6. Fecal coliform loads from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

DCTM_ ARP. xls Production Area Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 N/ A 0.0 0.1 0.0 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 N/ A 0.0 0.2 0.2 Total 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.2 Sector Baseline Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 7.2 7.2 7.2 7.2 4.3 N/ A 7.2 7.2 Dairy 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.8 N/ A 0.8 1.2 Swine 7.4 7.4 7.4 7.4 N/ A 0.0 1.1 0.3 Poultry 6.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 13.3 13.3 13.3 13.3 N/ A 0.0 13.3 13.3 Total 36.9 30.9 30.9 30.9 6.1 0.0 22.4 21.9 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.4 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 N/ A 0.5 1.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 6.3 1.9 6.3 Poultry 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 N/ A 1.6 1.6 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 10.4 0.0 0.0 Total 1.6 1.6 1.6 5.0 16.8 4.0 8.9 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.6 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.3 N/ A 0.3 0.3 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 1.4 0.9 1.4 Poultry 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 N/ A 0.5 0.5 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 2.3 0.0 0.0 Total 0.5 0.5 0.5 1.4 3.6 1.7 2.2 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.7 N/ A 0.0 0.1 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.2 N/ A 8.8 7.3 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.6 0.5 0.5 Poultry 31.2 31.2 31.2 31.2 N/ A 31.2 31.2 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 89.6 0.0 0.0 Total 31.2 31.2 31.2 63.1 90.1 40.5 39.1 Table A 9. Nitrogen load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values.

Table A 10. Phosphorous load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A 11. Sediment load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values. Table A 8. Metals loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

Table A X. BOD loads from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year.

DCTM_ ARP. xls Production Area Loads Entering RF3 Network and Reductions for Large CAFOS Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 213.7 N/ A 0.0 0.6 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 29.5 N/ A 32.4 22.9 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 137.1 135.8 136.1 Poultry 6.5 6.5 6.5 6.5 N/ A 6.5 6.5 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 56.4 0.0 0.0 Total 6.5 6.5 6.5 249.7 193.6 174.7 166.1 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 95.8 N/ A 0.0 0.3 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 113.8 N/ A 189.2 133.7 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 4037.5 3997.1 4006.2 Poultry 405.9 405.9 405.9 405.9 N/ A 405.9 405.9 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 120.4 0.0 0.0 Total 405.9 405.9 405.9 615.5 4157.9 4592.2 4546.1 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.1 0.0 0.1 Poultry 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 0.2 0.0 0.0 Total 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 Sector Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 5a Option 5 Option 6 Option 7 Cattle 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 N/ A 0.0 0.0 Dairy 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 N/ A 2.2 1.8 Swine 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 7.4 6.3 7.2 Poultry 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 N/ A 6.0 6.0 Poultry ( wet) 0.0 0.0 0.0 N/ A 13.3 0.0 0.0 Total 6.0 6.0 6.0 10.1 20.7 14.5 15.0 Table A 13. Fecal streptococcus load reductions from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

Table A Y. BOD load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Table A 12. Fecal coliform load reductions from Large CAFOs in 1019 colony forming units.

Table A 14. Metals load reductions from Large CAFOs in millions of pounds per year. Numbers in ( ) indicate negative values.

DCTM_ ARP. xls


ACRONYMS BEIS  Biogenics Emission Inventory System BELD  Biogenic Emission Landcover Database BIOME  Biogenic Model for Emissions CAA  Clean Air Act CAIR  Clean Air Interstate Rule CAMx  Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions CB4  Carbon Bond 4 CEM  Continuous Emissions Monitor CMAQ  Community Multi scale Air Quality model EGU  Electrical Generating Unit EMS  Emissions Model System HDD  Heavy Duty Diesel LADCO  Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium LNDE  Land Based Non Road Diesel Engine MACT  Maximum Achievable Control Technology MM5  Mesoscale Model ( fifth generation) NAAQS  National Ambient Air Quality Standard NCAR  National Center for Atmospheric Research NOx  Oxides of nitrogen OSAT  Ozone Source Apportionment Technology PAR  Photosynthetically Activated Radiation PBL  Planetary Boundary Layer PM  Particulate Matter PM2.5  Particulate Matter less than 2.5 microns ppb  parts per billion SIP  State Implementation Plan SO2  Sulfur Dioxide SOx  Oxides of sulfur SUV  Sport Utility Vehicle TSDF  Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities USEPA  United States Environmental Protection Agency VOC  Volatile Organic Compounds


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 224 (Tuesday, November 20, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58557-58558]
[FR Doc No: 2018-25288]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC19-5-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC-500); Comment
Request; Extension

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of information collection and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission or
FERC) is soliciting public comment on the currently approved
information collection, FERC-500 (Application for License/Relicense and
Exemption for Water Projects with More than 5 Megawatt Capacity).

DATES: Comments on the collection of information are due January 22,
2019.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments (identified by Docket No. IC19-5-
000) by either of the following methods:
     eFiling at Commission's website: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp.
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. For user assistance, contact FERC Online Support
by email at [email protected], or by phone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.
    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
[email protected], telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and fax at (202)
273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Title: FERC-500, Application for License/Relicense and Exemption
for Water Projects with More than 5 Megawatt Capacity.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ There is a pending Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in Docket
No. RM18-14-000 which proposes to make some changes to FERC-500.
This notice does not reflect the proposed changes to FERC-500 due to
Docket No. RM18-14.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    OMB Control No.: 1902-0058
    Abstract: Pursuant to the Federal Power Act, the Commission is
authorized to issue licenses and exemptions to citizens of the United
States, or to any corporation organized under the laws of United States
or any State thereof, or to any State or municipality for the purpose
of constructing, operating, and maintaining dams, water conduits,
reservoirs, power houses, transmission lines, or other project works
necessary or convenient for the development and improvement of
navigation and for the development, transmission, and utilization of
power across, along, from, or in any of the streams or other bodies of
water over which Congress has jurisdiction under its authority to
regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several States, or
upon any part of the public lands and reservations of the United
States.
    FERC-500 is an application (for water projects with more than 5
megawatt capacity) for a hydropower license or exemption. FERC-500
includes certain reporting requirements in 18 CFR 4, 5, 8, 16, 141,
154.15, and 292. Depending on the type of application, it may include
project description, schedule, resource allocation, project operation,
construction schedule, cost, and financing; and an environmental
report. After an application is filed, the Federal agencies with
responsibilities under the Federal Power Act (FPA) and other
statutes,\2\ the States, Indian tribes, and other participants have
opportunities to request additional studies and provide comments and
recommendations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Statutes include the Electric Consumers Protection Act
(ECPA), the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), the Endangered
Species Act, the Federal Water Pollution Control Amendments of 1972
(the Clean Water Act), and the Coastal Zone Management Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Submittal of the FERC-500 application is necessary to fulfill the
requirements of the FPA in order for the Commission to make the
required finding that the proposal is economically, technically, and
environmentally sound, and is best adapted to a comprehensive plan for
improving/developing a waterway or waterways.
    Type of Respondent: Applicants for major hydropower licenses or
exemptions greater than 5 MW
    Estimate of Annual Burden \3\: Applicants for licenses are required
to include an estimate of their cost to prepare the license
application, which would include nearly all of the reporting
requirements in FERC-500.\4\ Because the requirements for an exemption
application are largely the same as that of a license application, the
license application costs are a good estimate of the exemption
application costs and of the overall burden of preparing license and
exemption applications for projects greater than 5 MW.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ ``Burden'' is the total time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or
provide information to or for a Federal agency. For further
explanation of what is included in the information collection
burden, refer to Title 5 Code of Federal Regulations 1320.3.
    \4\ Exceptions would be 18 CFR 2.19, 4.201, 4.202, 4.303, 4.35,
8.1, 8.2, 16.19, 141.15, and 292.208, none of which directly relate
to preparation of a license or exemption application for a project
greater than 5 MW.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To estimate the burden, we used actual data reported by applicants
for proposed projects greater than 5 MW filed in fiscal years (FY) 2016
through 2018, and averaged the reported license application costs. The
results are presented in the table below.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           Fiscal year                                FY 2016         FY 2017         FY 2018
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of applications (Responses)..............................              14               8               6
Average Cost per Response.......................................      $3,571,786      $3,735,714      $2,293,413
Total Burden Cost for All Applications (Responses)..............      50,005,004      29,885,712      13,760,478
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The average burden cost per application over the period FY 2016
through FY 2018 was approximately $3,344,686 \5\. We estimate a cost
(salary plus benefits) of $79/hour.\6\ Using this hourly cost estimate,
the average burden for each application filed from FY 2016 to FY 2018
is 42,338 hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ $93,651,194 (Total burden cost from FY 2016-2018) / 28
(total number of applications received from FY 2016-2018) =
$3,344,686.
    \6\ FERC staff estimates that industry is similarly situated in
terms of the hourly cost for salary plus benefits. Therefore, we are
using the FERC FY 2018 hourly cost (salary plus benefits) of $79/
hour.

                                                    FERC-500
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                        Annual number                  Average burden hours  Total annual burden
Number of respondents   of responses    Total number      & cost ($) per        hours & total        Cost per
                       per respondent   of responses         response          annual cos ($)t    respondent ($)
(1)                               (2)     (1) * (2) =  (4).................  (3) * (4) = (5)....       (5) / (1)
                                                  (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9....................               1               9  42,337.79 hrs.;       381,040.11 hrs.;      $3,344,685.50
                                                        $3,344,685.50.        $30,102,169.50.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the Commission, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden and
cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information collection; and (4) ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are
to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.

    Dated: November 14, 2018.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-25288 Filed 11-19-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 57 (Friday, March 26, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 16041-16043]
[FR Doc No: 2021-06205]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2020-0696; Product Identifier 2018-SW-019-AD; Amendment
39-21485; AD 2021-07-08]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH
(Type Certificate Previously Held by Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH and
Eurocopter Canada Ltd.) Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 97-26-02
for Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model BO-105A, BO-105C, BO-105S, BO-
105LS A-1, and BO-105LS A-3 helicopters; and Eurocopter Canada Ltd.
Model BO-105LS A-3 helicopters. AD 97-26-02 required a repetitive
visual inspection for cracks in the ribbed area of the main rotor (M/R)
mast flange (flange), and depending on the outcome, replacing the M/R
mast. This new AD retains the requirements of AD 97-26-02 and removes
the reinforced M/R mast from the applicability. This AD was prompted by
the determination that a certain reinforced M/R mast is not affected by
the unsafe condition. The actions of this AD are intended to address an
unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective April 30, 2021.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of December 31,
1997 (62 FR 65749, December 16, 1997).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX
75052; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; or at
https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. It is also available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0696.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://

www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA-2020-0696; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the European Aviation
Safety Agency (now European Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD,
the Transport Canada AD, any service information that is incorporated
by reference, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Fuller, AD Program Manager,
Operational Safety Branch, Airworthiness Products Section, General
Aviation & Rotorcraft Unit, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 to remove AD 97-26-02, Amendment 39-10245 (62 FR 65749,
December 16, 1997) (AD 97-26-02), and add a new AD. AD 97-26-02 applied
to Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model BO-105A, BO-105C, BO-105LS A-1,
and BO-105LS A-3 helicopters and Eurocopter Canada Ltd. Model BO-105LS
A-3 helicopters. AD 97-26-02 was prompted by Luftfahrt-Bundesamt (LBA)
AD 97-275, effective September 25, 1997, issued by LBA, which is the
airworthiness authority for Germany, to correct an unsafe condition for
Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Model BO 105 helicopters; and Transport
Canada AD CF-97-18, dated September 30, 1997 (Transport Canada AD CF-
97-18), issued by Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for
Canada. The LBA and Transport Canada ADs required an immediate and
repetitive visual inspection for a crack in the flange area after an M/
R mast was found to have cracks of critical magnitude.
    The NPRM published in the Federal Register on July 17, 2020 (85 FR
43506). The NPRM proposed to continue to require the repetitive visual
inspection for a crack in the ribbed area of the M/R mast flange, and
if there is a crack, removing from service the M/R mast and replacing
it with an airworthy M/R mast.
    The NPRM was prompted by EASA AD 2018-0056, dated March 14, 2018,
issued by EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of
the European Union, to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus
Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (previously Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH,
Eurocopter Hubschrauber GmbH, Messerschmitt-B[ouml]lkow-Blohm GmbH,
Eurocopter Canada Ltd, Messerschmitt-B[ouml]lkow-Blohm Helicopter
Canada Ltd.) Model BO105 A, BO105 C, BO105 D, BO105 LS A-1, BO105 LS A-
3 and BO105 S helicopters. EASA advises of the transfer of type
certificate responsibility of Eurocopter Canada Ltd. Model BO-105LS A-3
helicopters to Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH and the determination that
reinforced M/R mast part number (P/N) 4639 305 095 of M/R mast assembly
P/N 4639 205 017 is not affected by this unsafe condition. The EASA AD
retains the repetitive visual inspection requirements but only for
helicopters with M/R mast P/N 4619 305 032 of M/R mast assembly P/N
4638 205 005, and M/R mast P/N 4639 305 002 of M/R mast assembly P/N
4639 205 017. With the transfer of type certificate responsibility of
Eurocopter Canada Ltd. Model BO-105LS A-3 helicopters, Transport Canada
issued Transport Canada AD CF-1997-18R1, dated March 12, 2018, to
cancel Transport Canada AD CF-97-18.
    Also, since the FAA issued AD 97-26-02, Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH
changed its name to Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH. This AD
reflects that change and updates the contact information to obtain
service documentation.

Comments

    The FAA gave the public the opportunity to participate in
developing this final rule, but the FAA did not receive any comments on
the NPRM or on the determination of the cost to the public.

FAA's Determination

    These helicopters has been approved by EASA and are approved for
operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral
agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA of the
unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is issuing this AD after
evaluating all of the information provided by EASA and determining the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
helicopters of these same type designs and that air safety and the
public interest require adopting the AD requirements as proposed.

Differences Between This AD and the EASA AD

    The EASA AD specifies contacting Airbus Helicopters if there is a
crack in the flange, whereas this AD requires replacing the M/R mast
instead. Also, the EASA AD applies to Model BO105 D and BO105 S
helicopters; this AD does not as these model helicopters are not type-
certificated in the U.S.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH has issued Alert Service Bulletin No.
ASB-BO 105-10-110, dated August 27, 1997, which specifies procedures
for repetitive visual inspections of the flange for cracks.
    This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 21 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. The FAA estimates that operators may incur the following
costs in order to comply with this AD. Labor costs are estimated at $85
per work-hour.
    Inspecting the flange takes about 0.25 work-hour for an estimated
cost of $21 per helicopter and $441 for the U.S. fleet per inspection
cycle.
    Replacing the M/R mast takes about 8 work-hours and parts cost
about $30,000 for an estimated cost of $30,680 per helicopter.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA has determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and

the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among
the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 97-26-02, Amendment 39-10245
(62 FR 65749, December 16, 1997); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:

2021-07-08 Airbus Helicopters Deutschland GmbH (Type Certificate
Previously Held by Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH and Eurocopter Canada
Ltd.): Amendment 39-21485; Docket No. FAA-2020-0696; Product
Identifier 2018-SW-019-AD.

(a) Applicability

    This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to Airbus Helicopters
Deutschland GmbH Model BO-105A, BO-105C, BO-105S, BO-105LS A-1, and
BO-105LS A-3 helicopters, certificated in any category, with a main
rotor (M/R) mast part number (P/N) 4619 305 032 of M/R mast assembly
P/N 4638 205 005, or M/R mast P/N 4639 305 002 of M/R mast assembly
P/N 4639 205 017.

    Note 1 to Paragraph (a):  M/R mast assembly P/N 4639 205 017 may
also contain reinforced M/R mast P/N 4639 305 095, which is not
affected by this AD.

(b) Unsafe Condition

    This AD defines the unsafe condition as cracks in the M/R mast
flange (flange). This condition could result in failure of the
flange and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

(c) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 97-26-02, Amendment 39-10245 (62 FR 65749,
December 16, 1997).

(d) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective April 30, 2021.

(e) Compliance

    You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.

 (f) Required Actions

    (1) Before further flight and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 100 hours time-in-service, visually inspect the flange in the
ribbed area for cracks using a 5-power or higher magnifying glass in
accordance with paragraphs 2.A.1. and 2.A.2. of the Accomplishment
Instructions in Eurocopter Deutschland GmbH Alert Service Bulletin
No. ASB-BO 105-10-110, dated August 27, 1997.
    (2) If there is a crack, remove from service the cracked M/R
mast and replace it with an airworthy M/R mast.

(g) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, send
it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (h)(1) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office
or certificate holding district office, before operating any
aircraft complying with this AD through an AMOC.

(h) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Matt Fuller, AD
Program Manager, Operational Safety Branch, Airworthiness Products
Section, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Unit, FAA, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency (now European Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD
2018-0056, dated March 14, 2018; and Transport Canada AD CF-1997-
18R1, dated March 12, 2018. You may view the EASA and Transport
Canada ADs on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov in Docket
No. FAA-2020-0696.

(i) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6230, Main Rotor
Mast/Swashplate

(j) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
December 31, 1997 (62 FR 65749, December 16, 1997).
    (i) Eurocopter Deutshland GmbH Alert Service Bulletin No. ASB-BO
105-10-110, dated August 27, 1997.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (4) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER> or<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; or at
https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html.
    (5) You may view this service information at the FAA, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room
6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on March 20, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-06205 Filed 3-25-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P