[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 204 (Monday, October 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64509-64510]
[FR Doc No: 2012-25920]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0778; FRL-9523-1]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; TSCA Section 5(a)(2) Significant
New Use Rules for Existing Chemicals

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. The ICR, which is abstracted below,
describes the nature of the information collection activity and its
expected burden and costs.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before November 21,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OPPT-2011-0778 to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
Pollution Prevention and Toxics Docket, Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), Mailcode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB by mail to: Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Attention:
Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pamela Myrick, Deputy Director,
Environmental Assistance Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and
Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail code: 7408-M, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-554-
1404; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On April 9, 2012 (77 FR 21096), EPA sought comments on this
renewal pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments during
the comment period. Any comments related to this ICR should be
submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA EPA-HQ-OPPT-2011-0778, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person inspection at the OPPT Docket
in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public
Reading Room is open from 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is
202-566-1744, and the telephone number for the Pollution Prevention and
Toxics Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>. Use www.regulations.gov to submit or
view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the
public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that
are available electronically. Once in the system, select ``search,''
then key in the docket ID number identified above.
    EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted
electronically or in

paper, will be made available for public viewing in www.regulations.gov
as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, confidential business information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA
identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide
a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is
placed in www.regulations.gov. The entire printed comment, including
the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket.
Although identified as an item in the official docket, information
claimed as CBI, or whose disclosure is otherwise restricted by statute,
is not included in the official public docket, and will not be
available for public viewing in www.regulations.gov. For further
information about the electronic docket, go to www.regulations.gov.
    Title: TSCA Section 5(a)(2) Significant New Use Rules for Existing
Chemicals.
    ICR Status: This is a request to renew an existing approved
collection. This ICR is scheduled to expire on November 30, 2012. Under
OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the
collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
    Abstract: Section 5 of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA)
provides EPA with a regulatory mechanism to monitor and, if necessary,
control significant new uses of chemical substances. Section 5
authorizes EPA to determine by rule (i.e., a significant new use rule
or SNUR), after considering all relevant factors, that a use of a
chemical substance represents a significant new use. If EPA determines
that a use of a chemical substance is a significant new use, section 5
requires persons to submit a significant new use notice (SNUN) to EPA
at least 90 days before they manufacture, import, or process the
substance for that use.
    EPA uses the information obtained through this collection to
evaluate the health and environmental effects of the significant new
use. EPA may take regulatory actions under TSCA section 5, 6 or 7 to
control the activities for which it has received a SNUR notice. These
actions include orders to limit or prohibit the manufacture,
importation, processing, distribution in commerce, use or disposal of
chemical substances. If EPA does not take action, section 5 also
requires EPA to publish a Federal Register notice explaining the
reasons for not taking action. This information collection addresses
the reporting and recordkeeping requirements inherent in TSCA section 5
significant new use rules.
    Responses to the collection of information are mandatory (see 40
CFR part 721). Respondents may claim all or part of a notice as CBI.
EPA will disclose information that is covered by a CBI claim only to
the extent permitted by, and in accordance with, the procedures in 40
CFR part 2.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal
Register, are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and included on the related
collection instrument or form, if applicable.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average about
8.1 hours per response. Burden is defined in 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this ICR are companies that manufacture, process, import, or distribute
in commerce chemical substances or mixtures.
    Frequency of Collection: On occasion.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 53.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 736 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Costs: $63,799.
    Changes in Burden Estimates: There is a decrease of 440 hours in
the total estimated respondent burden compared with that identified in
the ICR currently approved by OMB. This change reflects updates to the
number of affected sites and responses and the correction of estimates
in the previous ICR. More details on the changes are outlined in the
Supporting Statement. The change is an adjustment.

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-25920 Filed 10-19-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 205 (Monday, October 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73115-73116]
[FR Doc No: 2016-25606]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0663]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Investigational New
Drug Safety Reporting Requirements for Human Drug and Biological
Products and Safety Reporting Requirements for Bioavailability and
Bioequivalence Studies in Humans

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing
that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the PRA).

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by
November 23, 2016.

ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX:<PHONE_NUMBER>, or emailed to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0672.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.

Investigational New Drug Safety Reporting Requirements for Human Drug
and Biological Products and Safety Reporting Requirements for
Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies in Humans; OMB Control
Number 0910-0672--Extension

    In the Federal Register of October 31, 2013 (78 FR 65338), FDA
published a document entitled ``Investigational New Drug Safety
Reporting Requirements for Human Drug and Biological Products and
Safety Reporting Requirements for Bioavailability and Bioequivalence
Studies in Humans.'' The document clarified the Agency's expectations
for timely review, evaluation, and submission of relevant and useful
safety information and implemented internationally harmonized
definitions and reporting standards for IND safety reports. The
document also required safety reporting for bioavailability and
bioequivalence studies. The document was intended to improve the
utility of Investigational New Drug (IND) safety reports, expedite
FDA's review of critical safety information, better protect human
subjects enrolled in clinical trials, and harmonize safety reporting
requirements internationally.
    The rulemaking included the following information collection under
the PRA that was not already included in 21 CFR 312.32 and approved
under OMB control number 0910-0014.
    Section 312.32(c)(1)(ii) and (c)(1)(iii) requires reporting to FDA,
in an IND safety report, of potential serious risks from clinical
trials within 15 calendar days for findings from epidemiological
studies, pooled analyses of multiple studies, or other clinical studies
that suggest a significant risk in humans exposed to the drug.
    Section 312.32(c)(1)(iii) specifies the requirements for reporting
to FDA in an IND safety report potential serious risks from clinical
trials within 15 calendar days for findings from in vitro testing that
suggest a significant risk to humans.
    Section 312.32(c)(1)(iv) requires reporting to FDA in an IND safety
report within 15 calendar days of any clinically important increase in
the rate of occurrence of serious suspected adverse reactions over that
listed in the protocol or investigator brochure.
    The rulemaking also included new information collection under the
PRA by requiring safety reporting for bioavailability and
bioequivalence studies (21 CFR 320.31(d)).
    In tables 1 and 2 of this document, the estimates for ``No. of
Respondents,'' ``No. of Responses per Respondent,'' and ``Total Annual
Responses'' were obtained from the Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research (CDER) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER) reports and data management systems for submissions received in
2013, 2014, and 2015, and from other sources familiar with the number
of submissions received under the noted 21 CFR section. The estimates
the ``Hours per Response'' are unchanged based on information from CDER
and CBER individuals familiar with the burden associated with these
reports and from prior estimates received from the pharmaceutical
industry.
    In the Federal Register of March 18, 2016 (81 FR 14860), we
published a 60-day notice requesting public comment on the proposed
extension of this

collection of information. No comments were received.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:

                                   Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden
                                                   [CDER] \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Number of                        Average
         21 CFR section              Number of    responses  per   Total  annual    burden per      Total hours
                                    respondents      respondent      responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
320.31(d) Bioavailability and                 13              15             195              14           2,730
 Bioequivalence Safety Reports..
312.32(c)(1)(ii) and (c)(1)(iii)             100               6             600              12           7,200
 IND Safety Reports.............
312.32(c)(1)(iv) IND Safety                   10               1              10              12             120
 Reports........................
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total (CDER)................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............          10,050
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

                                   Table 2--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden
                                                   [CBER] \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                     Number of                        Average
         21 CFR section              Number of    responses  per   Total  annual    burden per      Total hours
                                    respondents      respondent      responses       response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
320.31(d) Bioavailability and                  1               1               1              14              14
 Bioequivalence Safety Reports..
312.32(c)(1)(ii) and (c)(1)(iii)             137               4             548              12           6,576
 IND Safety Reports.............
312.32(c)(1)(iv) IND Safety                    5             1.4               7              12              84
 Reports........................
                                 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total (CBER)................  ..............  ..............  ..............  ..............           6,674
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of
  information.

    Dated: October 18, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-25606 Filed 10-21-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 243 (Wednesday, December 20, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Pages 60390-60391]
[FR Doc No: 2017-27373]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC18-32-000.
    Applicants: Jurisdictional Regional Equipment Sharing.
    Description: Joint Application under Section 203 of the Federal
Power Act for Pre-Authorization of the Jurisdictional Regional
Equipment Sharing for Transmission Outage Restoration Participants.
    Filed Date: 12/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20171213-5233.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/18.

    Docket Numbers: EC18-33-000.
    Applicants: Imperial Valley Solar 3, LLC.
    Description: Application under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act
of Imperial Valley Solar 3, LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5095.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER16-233-001.
    Applicants: Illinois Power Resources Generating, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Informational Filing Regarding
Upstream Change in Control to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5125.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER16-2566-003.
    Applicants: Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Informational Filing Regarding
Upstream Change in Control to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5109.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1648-002.
    Applicants: Illinois Power Generating Company.
    Description: Compliance filing: Informational Filing Regarding
Upstream Change in Control to be effective N/A.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5116.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-387-001.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., Emera Maine.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Errata Filing of Original Service
Agreement under Schedule 21-EM to be effective 1/1/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20171213-5165.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-440-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 1977R10 Nemaha-Marshall
Electric Cooperative NITSA NOA to be effective 12/1/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/13/17.
    Accession Number: 20171213-5214.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/3/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-441-000.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of Oklahoma.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: PSO-AEPOTC-WFEC Roosevelt-
Steed DPA to be effective 12/4/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5042.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-442-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.,
Missouri River Energy Services.
    Description: Request to Implement the 50 Basis Point RTO Membership
Adder For Five Members of Missouri River Energy Services of
Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc., et. al.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5097.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-443-000.
    Applicants: PJM Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to ISA, Service
Agreement No. 4527; Queue No. AA1-145 to be effective 8/10/2016.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5104.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-444-000.
    Applicants: Florida Power & Light Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: FPL Amendment No. 4 to Rate
Schedule No. 74 to be effective 2/13/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5105.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-445-000.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Entergy Services, Inc.,
Amended Service Agreements to be effective 2/12/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5107.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-446-000.
    Applicants: AmerenEnergy Medina Valley Cogen, L.L.C.
    Description: Tariff Cancellation: Notice of Cancellation of MBR
Tariff to be effective 2/12/2018.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5113.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-447-000.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Provo City Operating
Agreement Rev 1 to be effective 11/27/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5120.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-448-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: LGIA Willow Springs Solar 3
Project SA No 206 to be effective 12/15/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5139.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-449-000.
    Applicants: Southern California Edison Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Third Amendment LGIA Avalon
Hybrid Project SA No 154 to be effective 11/30/2017.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5140.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-450-000.
    Applicants: Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2017-12-14_MISO-PJM JOA
Clean up Revisions to be effective 6/28/2017.

    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5144.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-451-000.
    Applicants: Dynegy Kendall Energy, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Informational Filing Regarding
Upstream Change in Control to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5149.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-452-000.
    Applicants: Liberty Electric Power, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Informational Filing Regarding
Upstream Change in Control to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5150.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    Docket Numbers: ER18-453-000.
    Applicants: Ontelaunee Power Operating Company, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Informational Filing Regarding
Upstream Change in Control to be effective 12/31/9998.
    Filed Date: 12/14/17.
    Accession Number: 20171214-5151.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/18.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 14, 2017.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-27373 Filed 12-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 222 (Monday, November 18, 2013)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68986-68987]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27342]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 25

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0959; Special Conditions No. 25-504]

Special Conditions: Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER Series
Airplanes; Aircraft Electronic System Security Protection From
Unauthorized External Access

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final special conditions.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: These special conditions are issued for the Boeing Model 777-
200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes. These airplanes, as modified by
The Boeing Company, will have novel or unusual design features
associated with the architecture and connectivity capabilities of the
airplane's onboard network computer systems, which may allow access to
or by external computer systems and networks. This onboard network
system will be composed of a network file server, a network extension
device, and additional interfaces configured by customer option.
Connectivity to, or access by, external systems and networks may result
in security vulnerabilities to the airplane's onboard network system.
The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for this design feature. These special
conditions contain the additional safety standards that the
Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.

DATES:  Effective Date: The effective date of these special conditions
is November 18, 2013.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Varun Khanna, FAA, Airplane and Flight
Crew Interface Branch, ANM-111, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; facsimile<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On August 21, 2012, The Boeing Company applied for a change to Type
Certificate No. T00001SE Rev. 30 dated June 6, 2012 for installation of
an onboard network system, associated line replaceable units (LRUs) and
additional software functionality in the Boeing Model 777-200, -300,
and -300ER Series Airplanes. The Boeing Model 777-200 airplanes are
long-range, wide-body, twin-engine jet airplanes with a maximum
capacity of 440 passengers. The Boeing Model 777-300 and 777-300ER
series airplanes have a maximum capacity of 550 passengers. The Model
777-200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes have fly-by-wire controls,
software-configurable avionics, and fiber-optic avionics networks.
    The proposed architecture is novel or unusual for commercial
transport airplanes by enabling connection to previously isolated data
networks connected to systems that perform functions required for the
safe operation of the airplane. This proposed data network and design
integration may result in security vulnerabilities from intentional or
unintentional corruption of data and systems critical to the safety and
maintenance of the airplane. The existing regulations and guidance
material did not anticipate this type of system architecture or
electronic access to aircraft systems. Furthermore, regulations and
current system safety assessment policy and techniques do not address
potential security vulnerabilities, which could be caused by
unauthorized access to aircraft data buses and servers.

Type Certification Basis

    Under Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 21.17, The
Boeing Company must show that the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -
300ER series airplanes meet the applicable provisions of 14 CFR part
25, as amended by Amendments 25-1 through 25-128.
    If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (i.e., 14 CFR part 25) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -
300ER series airplanes because of a novel or unusual design feature,
special conditions are prescribed under Sec.  21.16.

    Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the type certificate for that model be amended
later to include any other model that incorporates the same novel or
unusual design feature, the proposed special conditions would also
apply to the other model under Sec.  21.101.
    In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and
proposed special conditions, the Boeing Model 777-200, -300, and -300ER
series airplanes must comply with the fuel vent and exhaust emission
requirements of 14 CFR part 34 and the noise certification requirements
of 14 CFR part 36 and the FAA must issue a finding of regulatory
adequacy under Sec.  611 of Public Law 92-574, the ``Noise Control Act
of 1972.''
    The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in 14 CFR 11.19,
under Sec.  11.38, and they become part of the type-certification basis
under Sec.  21.17(a)(2).

Novel or Unusual Design Features

    The Boeing Model 777-200, -300, -300ER series airplanes will
incorporate the following novel or unusual design features: An onboard
computer network system, and a network extension device. The network
extension device will improve domain separation between the airplane
information services domain and the aircraft control domain. The
proposed architecture and network configuration may be used for, or
interfaced with, a diverse set of functions, including:
    1. Flight Safety related control and information systems.
    2. Operator business and administrative support (operator
information domain);
    3. Passenger information and entertainment systems (passenger
entertainment domain), and;
    4. The capability to allow access to or by external sources.

Discussion

    The architecture and network configuration in the Boeing Model 777-
200, -300, and -300ER series airplanes may enable increased
connectivity to, or access by, external airplane sources, airline
operations, and maintenance systems to the aircraft control functions
and airline information services. The aircraft control functions and
airline information services perform functions required for the safe
operation and maintenance of the airplane. Previously these domains had
very limited connectivity with external sources. The architecture and
network configuration may allow the exploitation of network security
vulnerabilities resulting in intentional or unintentional destruction,
disruption, degradation, or exploitation of data, systems, and networks
critical to the safety and maintenance of the airplane. The existing
regulations and guidance material did not anticipate these types of
airplane system architectures. Furthermore, 14 CFR regulations and
current system safety assessment policy and techniques do not address
potential security vulnerabilities, which could be exploited by
unauthorized access to airplane systems, data buses, and servers.
Therefore, these special conditions are issued to ensure that the
security (i.e., confidentiality, integrity, and availability) of
airplane systems is not compromised by unauthorized wired or wireless
electronic connections.

Applicability

    As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
Boeing Model 777-200, -300, -300ER series airplanes. Should The Boeing
Company apply at a later date for a change to the type certificate to
include another model on the same type certificate incorporating the
same novel or unusual design feature, the special conditions would
apply to that model as well.

Conclusion

    This action affects only certain novel or unusual design features
on Boeing Model 777-200, -300, -300ER series airplanes. It is not a
rule of general applicability and affects only the applicant who
applied to the FAA for approval of these features on the airplane.
    The substance of these special conditions has been subjected to the
notice and comment period in several prior instances and has been
derived without substantive change from those previously issued. It is
unlikely that prior public comment would result in a significant change
from the substance contained herein. Therefore, the FAA has determined
that prior public notice and comment are unnecessary, and good cause
exists for adopting these special conditions upon publication in the
Federal Register.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 25

    Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701, 44702, 44704.

The Special Conditions

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special conditions are issued as part of
the type certification basis for Boeing Model 777-200, -300, -300ER
series airplanes modified by The Boeing Company.
    1. The applicant must ensure airplane electronic system security
protection from access by unauthorized sources external to the
airplane, including those possibly caused by maintenance activity.
    2. The applicant must ensure that electronic system security
threats are identified and assessed, and that effective electronic
system security protection strategies are implemented to protect the
airplane from all adverse impacts on safety, functionality, and
continued airworthiness.
    3. The applicant must establish appropriate procedures to enable
the operator to ensure that continued airworthiness of the aircraft is
maintained, including all post Type Certification modifications that
may have an impact on the approved electronic system security
safeguards.

Jeffrey E. Duven,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2013-27342 Filed 11-15-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 49 (Monday, March 14, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 13366]
[FR Doc No: 2016-05643]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2012-0497; FRL--9943-16-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Fossil Fuel Fired Steam Generating
Units (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``NSPS for Fossil Fuel Fired
Steam Generating Units (40 CFR part 60, subpart D) (Renewal)'' (EPA ICR
No. 1052.11, OMB Control No. 2060-0026), to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This is a proposed
extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through March 31,
2016. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal
Register (80 FR 32116) on June 5, 2015 during a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A
fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated
burden and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before April 13,
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2012-0497 to: (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA
Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer for
EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit: http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: Owners and operators of affected facilities are required
to comply with reporting and record keeping requirements for the
general provisions of 40 CFR part 60, subpart A, as well as the
specific requirements at 40 CFR part 60, subpart D. This includes
submitting initial notification reports, performance tests and periodic
reports and results, and maintaining records of the occurrence and
duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of
an affected facility, or any period during which the monitoring system
is inoperative. These reports are used by EPA to determine compliance
with the standards.
    Form Numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Fossil fuel fired steam generating
units.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart D).
    Estimated number of respondents: 660 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 71,500 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Total estimated cost: $17,100,000 (per year), which includes
$9,900,000 in annualized capital/startup and/or operation & maintenance
costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a small increase in the
respondent labor hours in this ICR compared to the previous ICR. This
is due to assuming all existing sources will have to re-familiarize
with the regulatory requirements each year. This also results in an
increase in labor costs for the respondents.
    In, addition there is a small increase in the Agency labor costs
due to an increase in labor rates. This ICR uses updated labor rates
from the Bureau of Labor Statistics to calculate burden costs. There is
also an increase is Agency labor hours this is not due to program
changes; rather, the changes occurred because we are rounding total
values in this ICR to three significant figures.

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-05643 Filed 3-11-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 170 (Wednesday, September 2, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 53218-53219]
[FR Doc No: 2015-21671]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-75767; File No. SR-CBOE-2015-074]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees Schedule

August 27, 2015.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that on August
17, 2015, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (``Exchange'' or
``CBOE'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's
Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule.\3\ First, the
Exchange proposes to eliminate references to CBOE Short-Term Volatility
Index (``VXST'') options. Specifically, as of June 2015, the Exchange
no longer lists VXST options. Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to
delete from the Fees Schedule all references to VXST, as such
references are no longer necessary and will be obsolete. The Exchange
also proposes to amend Footnote 31 of the Fees Schedule. Particularly,
the Exchange currently waives the SPXW Customer Priority Surcharge for
orders in SPX Weeklys (``SPXW'') options in the SPXW electronic book
that are executed during opening rotation on the final settlement date
of VXST options and futures and which have the expiration that
contribute to the VXST settlement calculation. As mentioned above, VXST
options (and futures) are no longer listed. However, the Exchange notes
that the CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC (``CFE'') recently introduced new
futures with a weekly expiration of a 30-day VIX and the Exchange
anticipates launching options with a weekly expiration of a 30-day VIX
as well. The new VIX futures (and options) expirations are calculated
using P.M.-settled SPXW options that expire 30 days later. As such, the
Exchange proposes to replace ``VSXT options and futures'' with ``VIX
options and futures'' in Footnote 31 as the Exchange believes it is not
appropriate to assess the surcharge on those SPXW options that are used
in determining the final settlement value on the final settlement date
of the new VIX weekly options and futures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Exchange initially filed the proposed fee changes on
August 5, 2015 (SR-CBOE-2015-071). On August 17, 2015, the Exchange
withdrew that filing and submitted this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\4\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \5\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitation
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ which requires that Exchange rules
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its Trading Permit Holders and other persons using
its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes the removal of ``VXST'' references in the
Fees Schedule maintains clarity in the Fees Schedule and promotes just
and equitable principles of trade by eliminating potential confusion
and removing impediments to and perfecting the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system. The Exchange believes it is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to exclude from the SPXW
Customer Priority Surcharge those options that are executed during
opening rotation and which have the expiration that contribute to the
VIX weekly settlement calculation because, VIX weekly settlement values
are based upon those SPXW options and the Exchange therefore wants to
encourage trading in those options at the opening on settlement days.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will
continue to encourage the trading of SPXW options that have the
expiration that contribute to the now VIX weekly settlement calculation
at the opening on settlement days, which will provide additional
liquidity and enhance competition in those securities, which ultimately
benefits all CBOE Trading Permit Holders (``TPHs'') and all investors.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burden on competition that are not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
intramarket competition because the proposed waiver would apply equally
to all CBOE TPHs who trade those SPXW options that are used in
determining the final settlement value on the final settlement date of
the

new VIX weekly options and futures. Additionally, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change will continue to encourage the trading of SPXW
options that have the expiration that contribute to the now VIX weekly
settlement calculation at the opening on settlement days, which will
provide additional liquidity and enhance competition in those
securities. The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule
changes will impose any burden on intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because the proposed rule change applies only to CBOE. To the extent
that the proposed changes make CBOE a more attractive marketplace for
market participants at other exchanges, such market participants are
welcome to become CBOE market participants.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \7\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \8\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2015-074 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2015-074. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2015-074 and should be
submitted on or before September 23, 2015.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-21671 Filed 9-1-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: November 7, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 217)]
[Notices]
[Page 66411]
[DOCID:fr07no08-111]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2007-D-0487] (formerly Docket No. 2007D-0260]

Draft Compliance Policy Guide; ``Sec. 110.310 Prior Notice of
Imported Food Under the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism
Preparedness and Response Act of 2002;'' Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft Compliance Policy Guide (CPG) entitled ``Sec.
110.310 Prior Notice of Imported Food Under the Public Health Security
and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002.'' The draft CPG
provides written guidance to FDA's and Customs and Border Protection's
(CBP's) staff on enforcement of section 307 of the Public Health
Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002 (the
Bioterrorism Act) and the agency's implementing regulations, which
require prior notice for food imported or offered for import into the
United States. The final rule entitled ``Prior Notice of Imported Food
Under the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002'' is published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.

DATES: Although you can comment on any CPG at any time (see 21 CFR
10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comment on the
draft CPG before it begins work on the final version of the CPG, submit
written or electronic comments concerning the draft CPG by December 8,
2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the draft CPG
to the Division of Compliance Policy (HFC-230), Office of Enforcement,
Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857.
Send two self-addressed adhesive labels to assist that office in
processing your request, or fax your request to<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Submit written comments on the draft CPG to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to http://
www.regulations.gov. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the draft CPG.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Laura Draski, Office of Regulatory
Affairs (HFC-100), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    FDA is announcing the availability of a draft CPG entitled ``Sec.
110.310 Prior Notice of Imported Food Under the Public Health Security
and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002.'' This guidance
is issued with CBP concurrence and explains to FDA and CBP staff the
FDA and CBP policies on enforcement of section 307 of the Bioterrorism
Act and its implementing regulations, which require prior notice to FDA
of all food imported or offered for import into the United States (21
CFR 1.276 through 1.285). The final regulation requiring that FDA
receive prior notice of the importation of food is published elsewhere
in this issue of the Federal Register and will take effect on May 6,
2009.
    FDA is issuing this CPG as level 1 guidance consistent with FDA's
good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft CPG, when
finalized, will represent the agency's current thinking on its
enforcement policy concerning prior notice. It does not create or
confer any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind
FDA, or the public. An alternative approach may be used if such
approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and
regulations.

II. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic copies or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. The draft CPG and received comments
may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday.
    Please not that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA only
through FDMS at http://www.regulations.gov.

III. Electronic Access

    An electronic version of the draft CPG is available on the Internet
at http://www.fda.gov/ora under ``Compliance References.''

    Dated: October 10, 2008.
Michael A. Chappell,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs.
[FR Doc. E8-26281 Filed 10-31-08; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 35 (Friday, February 21, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10052-10053]
[FR Doc No: 2020-03280]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2019-0799; Airspace Docket No. 19-AGL-13]
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal Airway V-71
and Area Navigation Route T-285 Due to the Decommissioning of the
Winner, SD, VOR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action amends VHF Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal
airway V-71 and area navigation (RNAV) route T-285. The FAA is taking
this action due to the planned decommissioning of the Winner, SD (ISD),
VOR navigation aid (NAVAID). The Winner VOR is being decommissioned in
support of the FAA's VOR Minimum Operational Network (MON) program.

DATES: Effective date 0901 UTC, May 21, 2020. The Director of the
Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under
Title 1 Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual
revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments.

ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can
contact the Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>. The Order is also available for inspection
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA Order 7400.11D at NARA, email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Colby Abbott, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it modifies the air traffic service route structure in the
National Airspace System as necessary to preserve the safe and
efficient flow of air traffic.

History

    The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking for Docket No.
FAA-2019-0799 in the Federal Register (84 FR 64795; November 25, 2019)
amending VOR Federal airway V-71 and RNAV route T-285. Interested
parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by
submitting written comments on the proposal. No comments were received.
    VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) and RNAV T-
routes are published in paragraph 6011 of FAA Order 7400.11D dated
August 8, 2019, and effective September 15, 2019, which is incorporated
by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The ATS routes listed in this document
would be subsequently published in the Order.
    FAA Order 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15.

Differences From the NPRM

    In the NPRM proposal section addressing the proposed amendment to
RNAV route T-285 and in the regulatory text section describing T-285,
the North Platte, NE, NAVAID was identified as a VORTAC, in error. The
North Platte, NE, NAVAID is a VOR/Distance Measuring Equipment (VOR/
DME) facility. This rule corrects that editorial error in the rule
section and regulatory text.
    Also in the NPRM proposal section, one of the proposed amendments
to T-285 indicated that the Rapid City VORTAC ``RAP'' identifier would
be added to the first line of the route description. This too was in
error and should have stated the North Platte, NE, VOR/DME ``LBF''
identifier would be added. The regulatory text for the T-285
description correctly indicated ``North Platte, NE (LBF)'' in the first
line of the description as was intended. This rule corrects that
editorial error in the rule section.
    These editorial corrections do not change the route's structure,
operational use, or charted depiction, and are consistent with the
proposed amendments to T-285.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order 7400.11D, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and effective September 15,
2019. FAA Order 7400.11D is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11D lists Class A,
B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Rule

    The FAA is amending Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
part 71 by modifying VOR Federal airway V-71

by removing an airway segment, and RNAV route T-285 by replacing the
Winner VOR route point with a newly established waypoint. The planned
decommissioning of the Winner, SD, VOR has made this action necessary.
The air traffic service (ATS) route actions are described below.
    V-71: V-71 extends between the Fighting Tiger, LA, VORTAC and the
Williston, ND, VOR/DME NAVAIDs. The airway segment between the O'Neill,
NE, VORTAC and the Pierre, SD, VORTAC is removed. The unaffected
portions of the existing airway remain as charted.
    T-285: T-285 extends between the North Platte, NE, VOR/DME and the
Huron, SD, VORTAC NAVAIDs. The Winner, SD, VOR route point is replaced
with the new LESNR waypoint established overhead the Winner VOR
location. Additionally, the North Platte VOR/DME ``LBF'' identifier and
Huron VORTAC ``HON'' identifier are added to the first line of the
route description and the geographic coordinates of each route point
are updated to be expressed in degrees, minutes, seconds, and
hundredths of a second. The existing route remains as charted.
    The NAVAID radials listed in the V-71 airway description below are
unchanged and stated in True degrees.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that only affects air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified that this rule, when promulgated,
does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    The FAA has determined that this airspace action of amending ATS
routes V-71 and T-285 due to the planned decommissioning of the Winner,
SD, VOR has no potential to cause any significant environmental
impacts, and no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant
preparation of an environmental assessment. Therefore, this airspace
action has been categorically excluded from further environmental
impact review in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) and its implementing regulations at 40 CFR parts 1500-1508, and
in accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures, paragraph 5-6.5a, which categorically excludes from
further environmental impact review rulemaking actions that designate
or modify classes of airspace areas, airways, routes, and reporting
points (see 14 CFR part 71, Designation of Class A, B, C, D, and E
Airspace Areas; Air Traffic Service Routes; and Reporting Points). In
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, paragraph 5-2 regarding
Extraordinary Circumstances, this action has been reviewed for factors
and circumstances in which a normally categorically excluded action may
have a significant environmental impact requiring further analysis, and
it is determined that no extraordinary circumstances exist that warrant
preparation of an environmental assessment.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

Adoption of the Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11D,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 8, 2019, and
effective September 15, 2019, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways.

* * * * *

V-71 [Amended]

    From Fighting Tiger, LA; Natchez, MS; Monroe, LA; El Dorado, AR;
Hot Springs, AR; INT Hot Springs 358[deg] and Harrison, AR, 176[deg]
radials; Harrison; Springfield, MO; Butler, MO; Topeka, KS; Pawnee
City, NE; INT Pawnee City 334[deg] and Lincoln, NE, 146[deg]
radials; Lincoln; Columbus, NE; to O'Neill, NE. From Pierre, SD;
Bismarck, ND; to Williston, ND.
* * * * *

Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes.

* * * * *

T-285 North Platte, NE (LBF) to Huron, SD (HON) [Amended]

North Platte, NE (LBF)          VOR/DME            (Lat. 41[deg]02'55.34'' N, long. 100[deg]44'49.55'' W)
Thedford, NE (TDD)              VOR/DME            (Lat. 41[deg]58'53.99'' N, long. 100[deg]43'08.55'' W)
MARSS, NE                       Fix                (Lat. 42[deg]27'48.92'' N, long. 100[deg]36'15.32'' W)
Valentine, NE (VTN)             NDB                (Lat. 42[deg]51'41.85'' N, long. 100[deg]32'58.73'' W)
LKOTA, SD                       WP                 (Lat. 43[deg]15'28.00'' N, long. 100[deg]03'14.00'' W)
LESNR, SD                       WP                 (Lat. 43[deg]29'16.06'' N, long. 99[deg]45'41.55'' W)
Huron, SD (HON)                 VORTAC             \(Lat. 44[deg]26'24.30'' N, long. 98[deg]18'39.89'' W)

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 12, 2020.
Mark Gauch,
Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2020-03280 Filed 2-20-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 22, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10535-10536]
[FR Doc No: 2012-4037]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2007-D-0369]

Final Guidances for Industry Describing Product-Specific
Bioequivalence Recommendations; Availability

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of final product-specific bioequivalence (BE)
recommendations. The recommendations provide product-specific guidance
on the design of BE studies to support abbreviated new drug
applications (ANDAs). In the Federal Register of June 11, 2010 (75 FR
33311), FDA announced the availability of a guidance for industry,
``Bioequivalence Recommendations for Specific Products,'' which
explained the process that would be used to make product-specific BE
recommendations available to the public on FDA's Web site. The BE
recommendations identified in this notice were developed using the
process described in that guidance.

DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on Agency guidances at any
time.

ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the individual
BE guidances to the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002. Send
one self-addressed adhesive label to assist that office in processing
your requests. See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic
access to the recommendations.
    Submit electronic comments to http://www.regulations.gov. Submit
written comments on product-specific BE recommendations to the Division
of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630
Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doan T. Nguyen, Center for Drug
Evaluation and Research (HFD-600), Food and Drug Administration, 7519
Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    In the Federal Register of June 11, 2010, FDA announced the
availability of a guidance for industry entitled ``Bioequivalence
Recommendations for Specific Products,'' which explained the process
that would be used to make product-specific BE recommendations
available to the public on FDA's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/CDER/GUIDANCE/bioequivalence/default.htm. As described in that guidance, FDA
adopted this process as a means to develop and disseminate product-
specific BE recommendations and provide a meaningful opportunity for
the public to consider and comment on those recommendations. Under that
process, recommendations are posted on FDA's Web site and announced
periodically in the Federal Register. The public is encouraged to
submit comments on those recommendations within 60 days of their
announcement in the Federal Register. FDA considers any comments
received and either publishes final recommendations or publishes
revised draft recommendations for comment. Once finalized, the
recommendations are posted on FDA's Web site and announced in the
Federal Register. This notice announces final product-specific
recommendations that were posted on FDA's Web site in October 2011.
    For a complete history of previous Federal Register notices
relating to product-specific BE recommendations, please go to http://www.regulations.gov and enter docket number FDA-2007-D-0369.
    These guidances are being issued consistent with FDA's good
guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidances represent
the Agency's current thinking on product-specific design of BE studies
to support ANDAs. They do not create or confer any rights for or on any
person and do not operate to bind FDA or the public. An alternative
approach may be used if such approach satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.

II. Drug Products for Which Final Product-Specific BE Recommendations
are Available

    FDA is announcing final product-specific BE recommendations for
drug products containing the following active ingredients:

A

Acetaminophen; Caffeine; Dihydrocodeine Bitartrate

C

Cephalexin
Ciprofloxacin

D

Desmopressin Acetate

E

Eletriptan HBr

F

Fenoprofen Calcium
Fludrocortisone Acetate

G

Glimepiride; Pioglitazone

H

Hydroxyzine Pamoate (multiple RLDs)

I

Imatinib Mesylate

L

Lansoprazole
Levetiracetam
Linezolid

M

Meprobamate
Methotrexate Sodium (multiple RLDs)
Methylprednisolone Acetate
Metoclopramide HCl

N

Nadolol
Nifedipine
Nilutamide
Nisoldipine
Nitazoxanide
Nitrofurantoin
Nitrofurantoin Macrocrystalline

O

Oxybutynin Chloride

P

Phendimetrazine Tartrate (multiple RLDs)
Phentermine HCl (multiple RLDs)
Phytonadione
Pregabalin
Propafenone HCl
Pyridostigmine Bromide

R

Raltegravir Potassium
Ramelteon

S

Scopolamine
Selegiline
Sorafenib Tosylate

T

Tamoxifen Citrate
Telbivudine
Temazepam
Terbinafine HCl
Toremifene Citrate

V

Voriconazole

Z

Zolpidem

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) either electronic or written comments on any of the
specific BE recommendations posted on FDA's Web site. It is only
necessary to send one set of comments. Identify comments with the
docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. The

guidance, notices, and received comments are available for public
examination in the Division of Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday.
    Please note that on January 15, 2008, the FDA Division of Dockets
Management Web site transitioned to the Federal Dockets Management
System (FDMS). FDMS is a Government-wide, electronic docket management
system. Electronic comments or submissions will be accepted by FDA
through FDMS only at http://www.regulations.gov.

IV. Electronic Access

    Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
either http://www.fda.gov/CDER/GUIDANCE/bioequivalence/default.htm or
http://www.regulations.gov.

    Dated: February 14, 2012.
Leslie Kux,
Acting Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2012-4037 Filed 2-21-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: August 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 147)]
[Notices]
[Page 43551-43553]
[DOCID:fr01au06-102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54215; File No. SR-NYSE-2006-51]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Relating to NYSE Rule 36 To Allow a Registered Competitive Market Maker
To Call To and Receive Calls From the Booth

July 26, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 3, 2006, the New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \4\ thereunder, which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NYSE is proposing to amend NYSE Rule 36 (Communication Between
Exchange and Members' Offices) to allow a Registered Competitive Market
Maker (``RCMM'') to use an Exchange authorized and provided portable
telephone on the Exchange Floor to call to and receive calls from his
or her booth on the Floor, provided certain conditions are met.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

 1. Purpose
NYSE Rule 36
    NYSE Rule 36 governs the establishment of telephone or electronic
communications between the Exchange's Trading Floor and any other
location. Currently, NYSE Rules 36.20 through 36.22 provide that,
subject to certain restrictions, Floor brokers and RCMMs are allowed to
use Exchange authorized and provided portable phones on the Exchange
Floor.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The Exchange has authorized the use of portable phones by
Floor brokers and RCMMs pursuant to a series of pilots. The current
pilot is scheduled to expire July 31, 2006 (``Pilot''). See
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53277 (February 13, 2006), 71 FR
8877 (February 21, 2006) (SR-NYSE-2006-03).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Under the existing Pilot, subject to certain restrictions, RCMMs
are allowed to use an Exchange authorized and provided portable phone
solely to communicate with their or their member organizations' off-
Floor office and the off-Floor office of their clearing member
organization to enter off-Floor orders and to discuss matters related
to the clearance and settlement of transactions, provided the off-Floor
office uses a wired telephone line for these discussions. RCMMs are not
allowed to use a portable phone to conduct any agency business.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53213 (February 2,
2006), 71 FR 7103 (February 10, 2006) (SR-NYSE-2005-80).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Amendment to NYSE Rule 36.22
    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE Rule 36.22 to allow RCMMs to
call their booths on the Floor for business-related purposes, including
discussing trade reporting and executions and clearance and settlement
of trades, much as they do today by calling their upstairs office
personnel and their clearing member organization's upstairs offices.
Booth personnel would also be allowed to call their RCMMs' Exchange
authorized and provided portable phones for business-related purposes.
In turn, all booth phones on the Floor which are used to make calls to
and receive calls from RCMMs' Exchange authorized and provided portable
phones would be systemically blocked by the Exchange from call-
forwarding and conference calling.\7\ By allowing RCMMs to communicate
with their booths on the Floor, NYSE believes that the proposed rule
change would increase the efficiency of trading on the Floor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See proposed NYSE Rule 36.22(c)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, all Exchange authorized and provided portable phones
used by Floor brokers and RCMMs do not have call-forwarding or
conference calling capabilities and would continue to not have such
capabilities.\8\ The Exchange would issue a revised Member Education
Bulletin outlining the amendment to the Pilot.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See proposed NYSE Rules 36.21(a)(v) and 36.22(c)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act \9\ in that it is designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market
system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
NYSE believes that the amendment to NYSE Rule 36 supports the mechanism
of free and open markets by providing for increased means by which
communications on the Floor of the Exchange may take place.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \10\ Telephone conversation between David Matta, Principal Rule
Counsel, NYSE, and Molly M. Kim, Special Counsel, Division of Market
Regulation, Commission, on July 11, 2006.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    The Exchange has neither solicited nor received written comments on
the proposed rule change.

 III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate if consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\12\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has requested that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative period under Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) of the Act.\13\ The
Commission believes that it is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest to waive the 30-day operative delay
and make this proposed rule change immediately effective upon filing.
The Commission believes that the waiver of the 30-day operative delay
may increase the efficiency of the Exchange by providing immediate use
of Exchange authorized and portable phones to RCMMs to communicate with
their booths on the Floor. For this reason, the Commission designates
the proposal to be effective and operative upon filing with the
Commission.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \14\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay for this
proposal, the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact
on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that proper surveillance is an essential
component of any telephone access policy to an exchange trading floor.
Surveillance procedures should help to ensure that RCMMs use portable
phones as authorized by NYSE Rule 36. The Commission expects the
Exchange to actively review these procedures and address any potential
concerns that arises. In this regard, the Commission notes that the
Exchange should address whether telephone records are adequate for
surveillance purposes. The Commission also requests that the Exchange
report any problems, surveillance, or enforcement matters

associated with RCMMs' use of an Exchange authorized and provided
portable telephone on the Exchange Floor. Furthermore, in any future
additional filings on the Pilot, the Commission would expect that the
Exchange submit information documenting the usage of the Exchange
authorized and portable phones and any problem that have occurred,
including, among other things, any regulatory actions or concerns.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NYSE-2006-51 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2006-51. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the NYSE. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File number SR-NYSE-2006-51 and should be submitted on or before August
22, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-12322 Filed 7-31-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P