[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 68 (Monday, April 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21134-21137]
[FR Doc No: 2012-8429]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66727; File No. SR-CBOE-2012-025]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating to Exchange Trading Floor Booth Fees and
Policy

April 3, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on March 26, 2012, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated
(``CBOE'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by CBOE.
CBOE has designated the proposed rule change as it pertains to fees for
non-standard booths as ``establishing or changing a due, fee or other
charge'' under Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2)
thereunder,\4\ which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of
this filing by the Commission. Additionally, CBOE has designated the
proposed rule change as it pertains to the Exchange's trading floor
booth policy as constituting a ``non-controversial'' rule change under
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \5\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder,\6\
which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this filing by the
Commission. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \6\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule as it pertains to
Exchange trading floor booth fees and to update the Exchange's current
policy regarding the rental and use of booths on the CBOE trading
floor. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's Web site (http://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, CBOE included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. CBOE has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to revise the Exchange's
Fees Schedule to include fees for a ``non-standard booth'' (as defined
below) and to update the Exchange's policy (``Policy'') regarding the
rental and use of booth space on the CBOE trading floor by Trading
Permit Holder (``TPH'') organizations.
Fees
    The Exchange has booth space located on its trading floor that it
makes

available for rental to TPH organizations. These booths are located at
various locations on the trading floor adjacent to the trading crowds
where the actual CBOE trading activity takes place. The booths
generally are used by TPH organizations to perform various functions in
support of their CBOE trading activities.
    The Exchange Fees Schedule includes a monthly fee to rent a booth
that is based on the location of the booth on the trading floor. The
fee for booths located along the perimeter of the trading floor is $195
per month. The fee for booths located in the OEX, Dow Jones, MNX and
VIX pits is $550 per month.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See CBOE Fees Schedule, Section 8(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange is proposing to revise the Exchange Fees Schedule to
include fees for a larger type of booth for use by TPH organizations.
This booth type is different in design and much bigger than a standard
booth. These booths can range from several hundred square feet as
compared to 4 square feet for a standard booth.
    The Exchange proposes to codify fees charged to TPH organizations
for rental of these larger booths. The proposed fees would be reflected
in Section 8 of the CBOE Fees Schedule as the fees for a ``non-standard
booth.'' A TPH organization would pay the fees per square foot in the
table below on a monthly basis for use of a non-standard booth:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Booth size                     Per sq. ft.              Per sq. ft.              Per sq. ft.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extra-Large (1000 sq. ft. or greater)  $5.50..................  $5.34..................  $5.23.
Large (800-999 sq. ft.)..............  8.00...................  7.76...................  7.60.
Medium (401-799 sq. ft.).............  9.50...................  9.22...................  9.03.
Small (400 sq. ft. or less)..........  15.00..................  14.55..................  14.25.
LENGTH OF LEASE......................  1 Year.................  2 Years (97%)..........  3 Years (95%).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The fee per square foot a TPH organization would pay for a non-
standard booth would be determined based on the size of the booth and
length of the lease the TPH organization enters into with the Exchange.
Greater booth size and longer lease terms would result in a reduced fee
per square foot.
    Non-standard booths would be grouped into four size categories:
Small (400 square feet or less), Medium (from 401 to 799 square feet),
Large (from 800 to 999 square feet) and Extra-Large (1000 square feet
or greater). As an example, the fee for a Small non-standard booth
leased for one year would be $15.00 per square foot. Greater booth size
would result in a reduced fee per square foot.
    The amount of the fee per square foot would also be reduced based
on the length of the lease. For example, the fee for a Small non-
standard booth leased for two years would be $14.55 per square foot (a
3% discount from the fee for a one year lease) and the fee for a Small
non-standard booth leased for three years would be $14.25 per square
foot (a 5% discount from the fee for a one year lease).
    A TPH organization that terminates its lease prior to its
expiration date would, on the effective date of such termination, pay
to the Exchange an amount equal to twenty five percent (25%) of the
balance of the monthly charges remaining in the lease term. In
addition, a TPH Organization would be responsible for all costs
associated with any modifications and alterations to any trading floor
booths leased by the TPH Organization and would be required to
reimburse CBOE for all costs incurred by CBOE in connection therewith.
This fee would be reflected in Section 8 of the CBOE Fees Schedule as a
``booth pass-through fee.''
    The proposed fees will take effect on April 1, 2012.
Policy
    The Exchange memorialized the Policy and filed it with the
Commission in 1994.\8\ The Exchange proposes to update the Policy in a
few respects. First, the Exchange proposes to change references to
``member organization'' and ``member firm'' to ``TPH Organization'' and
to replace a reference to the ``Facilities Committee'', which no longer
exists, with ``the Exchange''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 33972 (April 28, 1994),
59 FR 23242 (May 5, 1994).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Second, the Exchange proposes to amend the Policy with respect to
eligibility requirements for booths. The Policy currently sets forth
four broad categories of TPH organizations that may rent booth space on
the floor. These categories accommodate TPH organizations having the
greatest need of working space in close proximity to CBOE trading
activity, and they encompass almost all major types of CBOE TPH
organizations. Market-maker organizations are the only major category
that may not obtain a booth under the Policy. Clearing firms lease the
majority of the booths on the trading floor and market-maker
organizations customarily obtain booth space through their clearing
firms. Until recent years, demand for booth space on the trading floor
exceeded the supply. Prior to establishment of the Policy, the low
supply of booths coupled with the fact that clearing firms leased most
of the booths (many of which were used by their market-maker clients)
meant there was little booth space on the floor to accommodate order
flow providing firms. To help address this issue, market-maker
organizations were not allowed to obtain a booth under the Policy since
they could obtain booths through their clearing firms. At this time,
there is an ample supply of booth space on the trading floor.
Therefore, the Exchange believes there is no longer a need to prohibit
market-maker organizations from directly leasing booths. The Exchange
proposes to amend the Policy to provide that booths on the trading
floor will be allocated to any TPH organization that is in good
standing.
    No changes are proposed to the section of the Policy that addresses
the potential future need for the adoption of allocation and assignment
guidelines with respect to booth space. The Exchange has no such
guidelines in effect today and does not currently envision implementing
any in the foreseeable future. In the event that demand for booth space
at some point threatens to exceed availability, the Exchange would
establish allocation guidelines. The Policy informs TPH organizations
of this possibility and identifies the general nature of the criteria
upon which such guidelines would be based. Any such guidelines
established by the Exchange would be filed with the Commission under
Section 19(b) of the Act.
    At this time, the Exchange has ample space on its trading floor for
booth space. The Exchange will consider any reasonable request from a
TPH organization with respect to the

specifications for building a non-standard booth. The Exchange may deny
a request from a TPH organization to build a non-standard booth if the
Exchange determines the request is unreasonable with respect to the
specifications for the non-standard booth. A TPH organization that has
been denied a request to build a non-standard booth may appeal the
decision to the Appeals Committee under Chapter 19 of the Exchange's
rules.
    The Policy includes a section that sets forth the requirement that
all TPH organizations renting booths execute a ``Trading Floor Booth
Rental Agreement'' (hereinafter, ``Agreement'') which sets forth the
contractual terms, conditions and restrictions governing rental and use
of booths by TPH organizations.\9\ A copy of the Agreement was included
in the Exchange's 1994 rule filing noted above for the Commission's
information.\10\ The Agreement specifically sets forth the details of
the parties' contractual relationship regarding rental and use of the
booths. Among other provisions, the Agreement includes specific
provisions delineating the termination rights of both the TPH
organization and the Exchange and sets forth a procedure for adding
booths to and deleting booths from the Agreement. The Agreement also
spells out requirements respecting the TPH's use of the booths, such as
those governing the installation of equipment, the conduct of business,
and access of persons to the booths.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Agreement is non-negotiable and its terms are the same
for every TPH organization.
    \10\ Supra Footnote 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange has updated the Agreement (which is now referred to as
the Agreement for ``standard booths'') and created a separate form of
the Agreement for non-standard booths. A copy of each form of Agreement
is included with this filing in Exhibit 3. The forms are substantially
similar except for the differences in the lease terms (standard booths
are leased on a month-to-month basis), termination provisions \11\ and
applicable fees. The Exchange proposes to update this section of the
Policy to set forth the requirement that all TPH organizations renting
booths execute the applicable form of the Agreement. The Exchange will
disseminate the updated Policy and forms of the Agreement to Trading
Permit Holders by posting them on the Trading Permit Holder portion of
the CBOE web site (www.cboe.org).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The form of the Agreement for non-standard booths provides
that a TPH Organization may terminate the Agreement at any time for
any reason upon at least one hundred eighty (180) days prior written
notice to CBOE.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\12\ in
general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) \13\ of the Act
in particular, in that it is designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among CBOE
Trading Permit Holders, and the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \14\ of
the Act in particular in that it is not designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. The
Exchange believes the proposed fees for non-standard booths are
reasonable because there are higher costs related to operation of these
large size booths (e.g., utilities, routine maintenance, etc.) as
compared with a standard booth. The Exchange believes the proposed fees
are equitable and not unfairly discriminatory in that the fee per
square foot each TPH organization would pay would be determined in an
objective manner based on the size of the booth and length of the lease
the TPH organization enters into with the Exchange. The proposed fees
would be applied uniformly to all eligible TPH organizations that wish
to use a non-standard booth.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In addition, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) requirements that the rules of an
exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to remove impediments to
and to perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. The proposed rule change would update the Policy to reflect
non-standard booths and the requirement that TPH organizations enter
into the applicable booth lease agreement as well as make other non-
substantive changes that merely clarify the Policy and make it more
accurate. The Exchange believes these changes are designed to promote
just and equitable principles of trade by helping to make the Policy
easier to understand and putting TPH organizations on notice of the new
requirements for non-standard booths. The Exchange believes that
providing in the Policy for building non-standard booths for TPH
organizations may help provide additional depth and liquidity to
options traded on the CBOE trading floor by providing TPH organizations
more booth space from which to execute additional options transactions,
thereby removing impediments to and perfecting the mechanism for a free
and open market and a national market system.
    The proposed rule change would also establish a standard for the
Exchange's consideration of requests to build non-standard booths and
an appeals process for denials of such requests. The Exchange believes
the proposed standard and procedures for consideration of requests to
build non-standard booths and denials of such requests are reasonable
and designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade in that
they will help ensure Exchange decisions on building non-standard
booths are made in a fair and equitable manner while also protecting
the Exchange by providing it with the ability to deny any unreasonable
request.
    In addition, the proposed rule change would update the Policy to
eliminate a prohibition against market-maker organizations directly
leasing trading floor booths. Any TPH organization in good standing
would be eligible to lease a booth. Therefore the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is not designed to permit unfair discrimination
between TPH organizations in that it will help ensure that trading
floor booths are leased to TPH organizations on equal and non-
discriminatory terms.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    CBOE does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The portion of the foregoing rule change pertaining to fees for
non-standard booths has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) \15\ of the

Act and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \16\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Additionally, because the portion of the foregoing proposed rule
change pertaining to the Exchange's trading floor booth policy does
not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \17\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2012-025 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2012-025. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used.
    To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on
official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-CBOE-2012-025, and should be submitted on or before
April 30, 2012.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-8429 Filed 4-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 108 (Friday, June 5, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32108-32109]
[FR Doc No: 2015-13726]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2179-028; ER10-2181-028; ER10-2182-028.
    Applicants: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC, Nine Mile
Point Nuclear Station, LLC, R.E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-material Change in Status of the CENG
Nuclear Entities under ER10-2179, et al.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5327.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2794-017; ER10-2849-016; ER11-2028-017; ER12-
1825-015; ER13-1680-003; ER14-2672-002; ER11-3642-015.
    Applicants: EDF Trading North America, LLC, EDF Industrial Power
Services (NY), LLC, EDF Industrial Power Services (IL), LLC, EDF
Industrial Power Services (CA), LLC, EDF Industrial Power Services
(OH), LLC, EDF Energy Services, LLC, Tanner Street Generation, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of EDF Trading
North America, LLC, et al.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5335.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2985-016; ER10-3049-017; ER10-3051-017.
    Applicants: Champion Energy Services, LLC, Champion Energy, LLC,
Champion Energy Marketing LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of the Champion Utilities.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5332.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER11-4380-004; ER13-1562-003; ER13-1641-001; ER10-
2434-005; ER10-2467-005; ER10-2488-011; ER12-1931-005; ER10-2504-006;
ER12-610-006; ER13-338-005; ER12-2037-005; ER12-2314-004; ER10-2436-
005; ER11-4381-004.
    Applicants: Bellevue Solar, LLC, Catalina Solar Lessee, LLC,
Chestnut Flats Lessee, LLC, Fenton Power Partners I, LLC, Hoosier Wind
Project, LLC, Oasis Power Partners, LLC, Pacific Wind Lessee, LLC,
Shiloh Wind Project 2, LLC, Shiloh III Lessee, LLC, Shiloh IV Lessee,
LLC, Spearville 3, LLC, Spinning Spur Wind LLC, Wapsipinicon Wind
Project, LLC, Yamhill Solar, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Change in Status of the EDF-RE MBR Companies
under ER11-4380, et al.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5329.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER13-415-002.
    Applicants: Anahau Energy, LLC.
    Description: Notification of Change in Status of Anahua Energy,
LLC.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5336.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2245-001.
    Applicants: TriEagle Energy, LP.
    Description: Supplement to April 29, 2015 Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status of TriEagle Energy, LP.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5330.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER14-2708-004; ER14-2709-003; ER15-30-001; ER14-
2710-003; ER15-58-001.
    Applicants: Seiling Wind, LLC, Seiling Wind II, LLC, Seiling Wind
Interconnection Services, LLC, Palo Duro Wind Energy, LLC., Palo Duro
Wind Interconnection Services, LLC.
    Description: Supplement to January 13, 2015 Notice of Non-Material
Change in Status of Seiling Wind, LLC, et al. under ER14-2708, et al.
    Filed Date: 5/29/15.
    Accession Number: 20150529-5189.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1800-000.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): DEP-
DOM IA RS No. 196 Concurrence Filing to be effective 5/4/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5240.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1801-000.
    Applicants: Harborside Energy of Massachusetts, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing per 35.12 Market Based Rate Tariff
to be effective 6/27/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5241.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1802-000.

    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2015-
05-28_APS_EIMIA to be effective 8/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5267.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1803-000.
    Applicants: Ingenco Wholesale Power, L.L.C.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
Change in Category Status to be effective 5/27/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5275.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1804-000.
    Applicants: Collegiate Clean Energy, LLC.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii):
Change in Category Status to be effective 5/27/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5276.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1805-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): 2015-
05-28_CDWR_PLA_Am1 to be effective 7/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5279.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1806-000.
    Applicants: CED Corcoran Solar, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing per 35.12 Filing of Co-Tenancy and
Common Facilities Agreement to be effective 5/29/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5307.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1807-000.
    Applicants: New England Power Pool Participants Committee.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): June
2015 Membership Filing to be effective 5/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/29/15.
    Accession Number: 20150529-5072.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1808-000.
    Applicants: The United Illuminating Company, ISO New England Inc.
    Description: Section 205(d) rate filing per 35.13(a)(2)(iii): The
United Illuminating Company--Revisions to Schedule 21--UI to be
effective 6/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/29/15.
    Accession Number: 20150529-5086.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1809-000.
    Applicants: ATX Southwest, LLC.
    Description: Request for Transmission Rate Incentives and
Transmission Formula Rate Filing of ATX Southwest, LLC.
    Filed Date: 5/28/15.
    Accession Number: 20150528-5334.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/18/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1810-000.
    Applicants: Dillon Power, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing per 35.12 Application for Market-
Based Rate Authority to be effective 7/1/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/29/15.
    Accession Number: 20150529-5136.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/15.

    Docket Numbers: ER15-1811-000.
    Applicants: CED Corcoran Solar 2, LLC.
    Description: Initial rate filing per 35.12 Filing of Certificate of
Concurrence to be effective 5/29/2015.
    Filed Date: 5/29/15.
    Accession Number: 20150529-5183.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/15.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 29, 2015.
Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2015-13726 Filed 6-4-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 97 (Monday, May 22, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 23236]
[FR Doc No: 2017-10373]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ER17-1608-000]

Sunray Energy 3 LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Sunray Energy 3 LLC`s application for market-based rate authority, with
an accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is June 5, 2017.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
5 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list. They are also available for electronic review in the
Commission's Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive
email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s).
For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 16, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-10373 Filed 5-19-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: September 27, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 186)]
[Notices]
[Page 56514]
[DOCID:fr27se05-111]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

Federal Register Citation of Previous Announcement: 70 FR 54970,
September 19, 2005.

Status: Closed Meeting.

Place: 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC.

Announcement of Additional Meeting: Additional Meeting.
    An additional Closed Meeting has been scheduled for Friday,
September 23, 2005 at 9 a.m.
    Commissioners and certain staff members who have an interest in the
matter will attend the Closed Meeting.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c) (5), (7), (9)(B), and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(5), (7), 9(ii) and (10) permit consideration of the
scheduled matter at the Closed Meeting.
    Commissioner Atkins, as duty officer, determined that no earlier
notice thereof was possible.
    The subject matter of the Closed Meeting will be: Institution and
settlement of an injunctive action.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting items. For further information and to
ascertain what, if any, matters have been added, deleted or postponed,
please contact:
    The Office of the Secretary at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: September 22, 2005.
Jonathan G. Katz,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05-19316 Filed 9-23-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 190 (Friday, September 30, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67343-67345]
[FR Doc No: 2016-23681]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. IC16-11-000]

Commission Information Collection Activities (FERC Form Nos. 1,
1-F, and 3-Q); Comment Request

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Comment request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission previously issued a 60-day Notice in the
Federal Register (81 FR 38169, 6/13/2016) requesting public comments on
FERC Form Nos. 6, 580, 1, 1-F, and 3-Q. The Commission received no
comments regarding FERC Form Nos. 6 and 580 and issued a separate 30-
day Notice on those collections (81 FR 62112, 9/8/2016).
    The Commission did receive comments (responding to the 60-day
Notice) regarding FERC Form Nos. 1, 1-F, and 3-Q. This Notice addresses
those comments and solicits additional comments on FERC Form Nos. 1, 1-
F, and 3-Q.
    In compliance with the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D), the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission or FERC) is submitting the FERC Form No. 1
(Annual Report of Major Electric Utilities, Licensees, and Others),
FERC Form No. 1-F (Annual Report for Nonmajor Public Utilities and
Licensees), and FERC Form No. 3-Q (Quarterly Financial Report of
Electric Utilities, Licensees, and Natural Gas Companies) to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review of the information collection
requirements. Any interested person may file comments directly with OMB
and should address a copy of those comments to the Commission as
explained below.

DATES: Comments on the FERC Form Nos. 1, 1-F, and 3-Q are due by
October 31, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments filed with OMB, identified by the OMB Control Nos.
1902-0021 (FERC Form No. 1), 1902-0029 (FERC Form No. 1-F), and 1902-
0205 (FERC Form No. 3-Q) should be sent via email to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Attention:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Desk Officer.
    A copy of the comments should also be sent to the Commission, in
Docket No. IC16-11-000, by either of the following methods:
     eFiling at Commission's Web site: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp
     Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, Secretary of the Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    Instructions: All submissions must be formatted and filed in
accordance with submission guidelines at: http://www.ferc.gov/help/submission-guide.asp. For user assistance, contact FERC Online Support
by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by phone at:<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll-free), or<PHONE_NUMBER> for TTY.
    Docket: Users interested in receiving automatic notification of
activity in this docket or in viewing/downloading comments and
issuances in this docket may do so at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/docs-filing.asp.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ellen Brown may be reached by email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>, and by fax at
(202) 273-0873.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Type of Request: Three-year extension of the information collection
requirements for FERC Form Nos. 1, 1-F, and 3-Q, with no changes to the
current reporting requirements. Please note that each collection is
distinct from the next.
    Comments: Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collections of
information are necessary for the proper performance of the functions
of the Commission, including whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the agency's estimates of the
burden and cost of the collections of information, including the
validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the information collections; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of the collections of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.

FERC Form No. 1, Annual Report of Major Electric Utilities, Licensees,
and Others

    OMB Control No.: 1902-0021.
    Abstract: The FERC Form No. 1 (Form No. 1) is a comprehensive
financial and operating report submitted annually for electric rate
regulation, market oversight analysis, and financial audits by Major
electric utilities, licensees and others. Major pertains to utilities
and licensees having in each of the three previous calendar years,
sales or transmission services that exceed one of the following: (1)
One million megawatt hours of total annual sales; (2) 100 megawatt
hours of annual sales for resale; (3) 500 megawatt hours of annual
power exchanges delivered; or (4) 500 megawatt hours of annual wheeling
for others (deliveries plus losses).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ As detailed in 18 CFR 101 (Uniform System of Accounts
Prescribed for Public Utilities and Licensees Subject to the
Provision of the Federal Power Act, General Instructions) and 18 CFR
141.1. Nonoperating entities formerly designated as Major and new
entities that expect to be in the Major category should file as
detailed in 18 CFR 101.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Form No. 1 is designed to collect financial and operational
information and is considered to be a non-confidential public use form.
The Form No. 1 includes a basic set of financial statements:
Comparative Balance Sheet, Statement of Income, Statement of Retained
Earnings, Statement of Cash Flows, Statements of Accumulated
Comprehensive Income, Comprehensive Income, and Hedging Activities; and
Notes to Financial Statements. Supporting schedules contain
supplementary information and outlines of corporate structure and
governance; information on formula rates; and description of important
changes during the year. Other schedules provide information on
revenues and the related quantities of electric sales and electricity
transmitted; account balances for all electric operation and
maintenance expenses; selected plant cost data; and other statistical
information.
    Type of Respondent: Major electric utilities.
    Comments: In response to the 60-day Notice, the Commission received
comments from The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) collectively on
Forms 1 and 1-F.\2\ A summary of the comments and the Commission's
responses follow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The submittals are posted at http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=14318233 and http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=14318200.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) submitted comments
on 7/28/2016 on Forms 1 and 1-F.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BEA Comments: BEA uses data from Forms 1 and 1-F in estimating the
national income and product account (NIPA) structures investment
estimate. BEA states: ``While BEA uses this information indirectly
through the [U.S. Census Bureau's Construction Value Put-In Place]
program, it is considered an indispensable data source to the NIPA
estimates.'' \4\ BEA would like to explore receiving data directly from
the Commission with aggregated industry

totals of particular line items from Forms 1 and 1-F. BEA also suggests
that the Commission expand the Form 1 and 1-F collection to include
additional information regarding details on capital expenditures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FERC Response: BEA may access Form 1 and 1-F data directly: (1)
Using the Form 1 viewer and historical data that is accessible via the
Commission's Web site at www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/forms.asp; or (2) by
searching for individual filings in eLibrary at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp.
    The Commission is not presently considering modifications to
collect additional information on the Forms 1 and 1-F. Separately, the
Commission is looking at modernizing data collection in Docket No.
AD15-11, but that is an activity not addressed here.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ When FERC makes changes to the forms, instructions, and/or
reporting platform system, that information will be submitted to
OMB, as appropriate, for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). More information on the Forms Refresh project is posted at
http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/forms/eforms-refresh.asp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Estimate of Annual Burden: The estimated annual burden \6\ and cost
\7\ follow:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The one-time implementation burden (of 3 hours per
respondent for the Forms 1 and 1-F) for the Final Rule in Docket No.
RM11-24 (issued 7/18/2013) was administratively averaged over Years
1-3 giving an additional 1 hour annually for Years 1-3. Because the
implementation period and that 3-year period (of averaging the
implementation burden) have been completed, the additional 1 hour of
burden is removed here and for the FERC Form 1-F, below. These
changes were inadvertently omitted from the 60-day Notice in Docket
No. IC16-11.
    \7\ The cost estimate (wages plus benefits) is $78.66/hour and
is used for the Form Nos. 1, 1-F, and 3-Q. The $78.66/hour (wages
plus benefits) is based on figures from the Bureau of Labor
Statistics National Industry--Specific Occupational and Employment
Wage Estimates (May 2015 estimates at http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/naics2_22.htm, and benefits information for December 2015 at
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/ecec.nr0.htm) and is an average of
the following: (a) Management (code 11-0000) of $88.94/hour; (b)
business and financial operations occupations (code 13-0000) of
$56.86/hour; (c) legal (code 23-0000) of $128.94/hour; and (d)
office and administrative support (code 43-0000) of $39.91/hour.

                                                   Form No. 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total annual
                                Annual number   Total number    Average burden    burden hours &     Cost per
    Number of  respondents      of responses    of responses   hours & cost per    total annual   respondent ($)
                               per respondent                      response            cost
 (1)                                      (2)     (1) * (2) =  (4).............  (3) * (4) = (5)       (5) / (1)
                                                          (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
210..........................               1             210  1,168 hrs.;       245,280 hrs.;        $91,874.88
                                                                $91,874.88.       $19,293,724.80.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The instructions to the Form 1 will be updated to reflect the
current burden estimate and email addresses for FERC and OMB.

FERC Form No. 1-F, Annual Report for Nonmajor Public Utilities and
Licensees

    OMB Control No.: 1902-0029.
    Abstract: The FERC Form No. 1-F (Form No. 1-F) is a financial and
operating report submitted annually for electric rate regulation,
market oversight analysis, and financial audits by Nonmajor electric
utilities and licensees. Nonmajor pertains to utilities and licensees
having total annual sales of 10,000 megawatt-hours or more in the
previous calendar year and not classified as Major.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ As detailed in 18 CFR 101 (Uniform System of Accounts
Prescribed for Public Utilities and Licensees Subject to the
Provision of the Federal Power Act, General Instructions) and 18 CFR
141.2. Nonoperating entities formerly designated as Nonmajor and new
entities that expect to be in the Nonmajor category should file as
detailed in 18 CFR 101.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Form No. 1-F is designed to collect financial and operational
information and is considered to be a non-confidential public use form.
The Form No. 1-F includes a basic set of financial statements:
Comparative Balance Sheet, Statement of Retained Earnings, Statement of
Cash Flows, Statement of Comprehensive Income and Hedging Activities,
and Notes to Financial Statements. Supporting schedules contain
supplementary information and include revenues and the related
quantities of electric sales and electricity transmitted; account
balances for all electric operation and maintenance expenses; selected
plant cost data; and other statistical information.
    Type of Respondent: Nonmajor electric utilities.
    Comments: In response to the 60-day Notice, the Commission received
comments from the BEA on 7/28/2016. As indicated above, these comments
were submitted collectively for both Forms 1 and 1-F; a summary of the
comments and the Commission's responses are provided above under Form
1.
    Estimate of Annual Burden: The estimated annual burden and cost
follow. (The estimated hourly cost used for the Form No. 1-F is $78.66
(wages plus benefits) and is described above, under the Form No. 1.):

                                                  Form No. 1-F
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                Annual number                                      Total annual
                                of responses    Total number    Average burden    burden hours &     Cost per
    Number of respondents            per        of responses   hours & cost per    total annual   respondent ($)
                                 respondent                        response            cost
 (1)                                      (2)     (1) * (2) =  (4).............  (3) * (4) = (5)       (5) / (1)
                                                          (3)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5............................               1               5  122 hrs.;         610 hrs.;             $9,596.52
                                                                $9,596.52.        $47,982.60.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The instructions to the Form 1-F will be updated to reflect the
current burden estimate and email addresses for FERC and OMB.

FERC Form No. 3-Q, Quarterly Financial Report of Electric Utilities,
Licensees, and Natural Gas Companies

    OMB Control No.: 1902-0205.
    Abstract: The FERC Form No. 3-Q (Form No. 3-Q) is a quarterly
financial and operating report for rate regulation, market oversight
analysis, and financial audits which supplements the (a) Form

Nos. 1 and 1-F for the electric industry, or the (b) Form No. 2 (Major
Natural Gas Pipeline Annual Report; OMB Control No. 1902-0028) and Form
No. 2-A (Nonmajor Natural Gas Pipeline Annual Report; OMB Control No.
1902-0030) (for the natural gas industry). The Form No. 3-Q is
submitted for all Major and Nonmajor electric utilities and licensees;
and natural gas companies.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 18 CFR 260.1(b) states that for natural gas companies,
Major, as defined by the Natural Gas Act, pertains to a company
whose combined gas transported or stored for a fee exceed 50 million
Dth in each of the three previous calendar years. 18 CFR 260.2(b)
states that for natural gas companies, Nonmajor as defined by the
Natural Gas Act, pertains to a company not meeting the filing
threshold for Major, but having total gas sales or volume
transactions exceeding 200,000 Dth in each of the three previous
calendar years.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Form No. 3-Q includes a basic set of financial statements:
Comparative Balance Sheet, Statement of Income and Statement of
Retained Earnings, Statement of Cash Flows, Statement of Comprehensive
Income and Hedging Activities and supporting schedules containing
supplementary information. Electric respondents report revenues and the
related quantities of electric sales and electricity transmitted;
account balances for all electric operation and maintenance expenses;
selected plant cost data; and other statistical information. Natural
gas respondents include monthly and quarterly quantities of gas
transported and associated revenues; storage, terminaling and
processing services; natural gas customer accounts and details of
service; and operational expenses, depreciation, depletion and
amortization of gas plant.
    Type of Respondent: Major and nonmajor electric utilities and
natural gas pipelines.
    Comments: In response to the 60-day Notice, the Commission received
comments from two parties on Form 3-Q. A summary of the comments and
the Commission's responses follow.

     BEA submitted comments on 7/28/2016 on Form 3-Q.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The submittal is posted at http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=14318234.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    BEA Comments: BEA relies heavily on data from Forms 3-Q to
calculate components of both the industry and national economic
accounts to estimate gross output, intermediate input, and value
added to the U.S. economy from the utilities industry. Similar to
BEA's comments on Forms 1 and 1-F, BEA is interested in the
inclusion of additional information in Form 3-Q regarding details
related to capital expenditures. BEA suggests expansions to the Form
3-Q such as adding ``new versus replacement capital expenditures for
certain line items''; including ``annual payments for equipment,
software, and structures leased under operating leases from
others''; and improving ``questions to help identify plants
producing services in the current period (in service) versus plant
not in service or off-line''.
    FERC Response: The Commission is not presently considering
modifications to collect additional information on the Form 3-Q but
as noted above is looking at modernizing data collection, which is a
separate activity not addressed here.
     EEI submitted comments on 8/12/2016 on the Form 3-
Q.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The submittal is posted at http://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/common/opennat.asp?fileID=14328920.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    EEI Comments: In its comments, EEI proposes eliminating the Form
3-Q or reducing its frequency. EEI claims that the Form 3-Q has
little to no value to the Commission's objective to achieve vigilant
oversight of reporting entities. EEI states that it is unclear
exactly how and to what extent the Commission uses the quarterly
data and that no EEI member has ever been contacted about a Form 3-Q
filing. EEI poses that Form 3-Q does not lend itself to
identification of emerging trends or the economic effects of
significant transactions and events and that Form 3-Q has no bearing
on formula rate determination. As such EEI recommends that the
Commission eliminate Form 3-Q or alternately adopt a mid-year
frequency.
    Regarding the accuracy of the Commission's burden and cost
estimates, EEI comments that the Commission's estimates are
reasonable, but that EEI does not believe the burden and costs are
warranted.
    FERC Response: The Commission currently uses the Form 3-Q report
to perform oversight analysis and make timely evaluations of current
financial information submitted to the Commission. Additionally,
Form 3-Q is used to validate the debt and equity information of
filings under Part 34 of the Commission's regulations when the most
recent 12-month filing occurred more than 4 months prior to the
application under Part 34. The Commission is not presently
considering modifications to the collection or frequency of
collection of the Form 3-Q, but may consider doing so in the future,
at which time EEI will be able to submit comments on this issue.

    Estimate of Annual Burden: The estimated annual burden and cost (as
rounded) follow. (The estimated hourly cost used for the Form No. 3-Q
is $78.66 (wages plus benefits) and is described above, under the Form
No. 1.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The estimated number of electric filers of the Form No. 3-Q
is 213 (rather than the 215 total for the number of filers of the
Form Nos. 1 and 1-F) due to waivers granted by the Commission in
Docket No. AC04-105.

                                                                      Form No. 3-Q
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Annual number                                                Total annual burden
                                       Number of    of  responses    Total number of   Average burden hours &   hours & total annual    Annual cost per
                                      respondents   per respondent      responses         cost per response             cost             respondent ($)
                                      ...........              (1)     (2)(1) * (2) =  (4)...................  (3) * (4) = (5).......          (5) / (1)
                                                                                (3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FERC 3-Q (electric).................     \12\ 213                3                639  168 hrs.; $13,214.88..  107,352 hrs.;                  $39,644.64
                                                                                $8,444,308.
FERC 3-Q (gas)......................          167                3                501  167 hrs.; $13,136.22..  83,667 hrs.;                    39,408.66
                                                                                $6,581,246.
                                     -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total for FERC 3-Q..............                                            1,140                          191,019 hrs.;
                                                                                $15,025,554.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The instructions to the Form 3-Q will be updated to reflect the
current burden estimate and email addresses for FERC and OMB.

    Dated: September 26, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-23681 Filed 9-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 5 (Monday, January 9, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1125-1126]
[FR Doc No: 2012-94]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66078; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2011-173]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Modify Fees for the Trading and Compliance Data Package

January 3, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 23, 2011, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (``NASDAQ'' or
``Exchange''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    NASDAQ is proposing to modify the fees for trading and compliance
reports available to member firms via NasdaqTrader.com Trading and
Compliance Data Package under NASDAQ Rule 7021.
    The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new
language is italicized; proposed deletions are in brackets.

7021. NasdaqTrader.com Trading and Compliance Data Package Fee

    The charge to be paid by a Nasdaq Member for each entitled user
receiving Nasdaq Trading and Compliance Data Package via
NasdaqTrader.com is [$130]$175 per month (monthly maximum of 25
Historical Research Reports) or [$160]$225 per month (monthly maximum
of 100 Historical Research Reports). The Nasdaq Trading and Compliance
Data Package includes:
(a)-(c) No Change
    Nasdaq may modify the contents of the Nasdaq Trading and Compliance
Data Package from time to time based on subscriber interest.
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    NASDAQ is proposing to modify the fees for trading and compliance
reports available to member firms via NasdaqTrader.com Trading and
Compliance Data Package under NASDAQ Rule 7021 (``Data Package'').
[sic] Data Package allows member firms to obtain information regarding
their own historical quoting and trading activity on NASDAQ. Data
Package also provides member firms with information concerning their
compliance with NASDAQ and FINRA rules. In this regard, member firms
that subscribe to the Data Package can obtain the following reports:
(1) Monthly Compliance Report Cards, which outline firm's own
compliance with various FINRA rules; (2) Monthly Summaries, which
provide monthly trading volume statistics for the top 50 market
participants broken down by industry sector, security or type of
trading; and (3) Historical Research Reports, which provide a variety
of historical trading data such as a market maker's quote updates,
order activity, and detailed trade reporting information. Additionally,
subscribers can elect to receive the detailed trade report (Equity
Trade Journal) via a secure FTP dissemination option. These reports
offered by NASDAQ are based on the subscribing member's historical
trade information taken from NASDAQ and the FINRA/NASDAQ Trade
Reporting Facility, thus providing firms with a comprehensive
compliance picture.
    Use of this service is voluntary and member firms have the option
of subscribing to whichever level they choose. The Data Package is
offered in two levels: the ``basic'' level, which has a fee of $130 per
month, allows access to a maximum of 25 Historical Research Reports per
month; and the ``premium'' level, which has a fee of $160 per month,
allows access to a maximum of 100 Historical Research Reports per
month. These fees have not increased since June 2006, \3\
notwithstanding that NASDAQ subsequently developed and implemented
enhancements to the service.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54002 (June 16, 2006),
71 FR 36143 (June 23, 2006) (SR-NASD-2006-072) (increasing each of
the fees by $30 per month); see also Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 54260 (August 1, 2006), 71 FR 45084 (August 8, 2006) (SR-NASDAQ-
2006-024).
    \4\ Since 2006, the Data Package has been updated to include
necessary enhancements based on new market structure rules, as well
as new fields added to the Equity Trade Journal based on new
functionality offered by the FINRA/NASDAQ Trade Reporting Facility.
These enhancements, in conjunction with three new compliance
reports, have added significant value to the Data Package. In
addition, the ``front-end'' of the service has been redesigned to
simplify report requests and increase usability.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In order to help cover the costs associated with the maintenance of
the Data Package service, as well as the cost of implementing
enhancements to the service, NASDAQ proposes to increase the ``basic''
level subscription fee from $130 to $175 per month, and increase the
``premium'' level subscription fee from $160 to $225 per month. NASDAQ
anticipates that the proposed fees may provide NASDAQ with a profit, in
addition to covering costs discussed above.
2. Statutory Basis
    NASDAQ believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with
the provisions of Section 6 of the Act,\5\ in general, and Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\6\ in particular, because it provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
members and issuers and other persons using any facility or system that
NASDAQ operates or controls, and it does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. NASDAQ believes that
the proposed fees are reasonable because NASDAQ has made several
enhancements to the service since it last increased fees assessed for
the service in June 2006. As a consequence of adding these
enhancements, the value of the service has incrementally increased over
time and NASDAQ believes that it is appropriate to now raise the fees
to better align them with the increased value of the service. In
addition, NASDAQ believes that the proposed fees will cover the costs
associated with responding to customer requests, configuring NASDAQ's
systems,

programming to user specifications, and administering the service,
among other things, and may provide NASDAQ with a profit. NASDAQ also
believes that the fees are equitably allocated, since use of the Data
Package service is voluntary and the subscription fees will be imposed
on all purchasers equally based on the number of users and the level of
service subscribed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \7\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder.\8\ At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(a)(ii).
    \8\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2011-173 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2011-173. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used.

    To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room on
official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies
of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal offices of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2011-173, and should be submitted on or before
January 30, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-94 Filed 1-6-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  5/11/1994........  2/1/1995, 60 FR    ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           6027
 SIP which substitutes the
 California Low Emission
 Vehicle program for the Clean
 Fuel Fleet program.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  3/31/1994........  3/6/1995, 60 FR    ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           12123
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP dated    Statewide........  6/6/1994.........  4/1/1995, 60 FR    ......................
 June 6, 1994 submitting a                                              17226
 revision to the Massachusetts
 SIP.

Letter from the MassDEP dated    Statewide........  12/9/1994........  4/1/1995, 60 FR    ......................
 December 9, 1994.                                                      17226
Letter from the MassDEP,         Statewide........  6/28/1990........  3/21/1996, 61 FR   ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           11556
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  9/30/1992........  3/21/1996, 61 FR   ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           11556
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP, dated   Statewide........  7/15/1994........  3/21/1996, 61 FR   ......................
 July 15, 1994, submitting a                                            11556
 revision to the SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  12/30/1994.......  3/21/1996, 61 FR   ......................
 assuring EPA that the data                                             11556
 elements noted in EPA's
 December 13, 1994 letter were
 being incorporated into the
 source registration forms used
 by Massachusetts emission
 statement program.
Letter which included the        Statewide........  10/29/1993.......  1/30/1996, 61 FR   ......................
 oxygenated gasoline program,                                           2918
 amendments to the
 Massachusetts Air Pollution
 Control Regulations, 310 CMR
 7.00, with an effective date
 of March 1, 1994, requesting
 that the submittal be approved
 and adopted as part of the SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Metropolitan       12/12/1994.......  1/30/1996, 61 FR   ......................
 submitting a revision to the     Boston.                               2918
 SIP.
The Technical Support Document   Metropolitan       12/12/1994.......  1/30/1996, 61 FR   ......................
 for the Redesignation of the     Boston.                               2918
 Boston Area as Attainment for
 Carbon Monoxide.
Letter from the MassDEP dated    Statewide........  1/9/1995.........  12/19/1995, 60 FR  ......................
 January 9, 1995 submitting a                                           65240
 revision to the SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP, dated   Statewide........  1/9/1995.........  2/14/1996, 61 FR   ......................
 January 9, 1995, submitting a                                          5696
 revision to the SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  3/29/1995........  7/5/2000, 65 FR    ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           41344
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Metropolitan       7/30/1993........  10/15/1996, 61 FR  ......................
 submitting a revision to the     Boston.                               53628
 SIP (City of Boston/South
 Boston Parking Freeze).
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  2/9/1994.........  8/8/1996, 61 FR    ......................
 submitting revisions to the                                            41335
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  3/29/1995........  8/8/1996, 61 FR    ......................
 submitting revisions to the                                            41335
 SIP.
Letter and attachments from the  Statewide........  2/8/1996.........  8/8/1996, 61 FR    ......................
 MassDEP submitting                                                     41335
 supplemental information
 concerning the demonstration
 of balance between credit
 creation and credit use.
Massachusetts PAMS Network       Statewide........  11/15/1993.......  7/14/1997, 62 FR   ......................
 Plan, which incorporates PAMS                                          37510
 into the ambient air quality
 monitoring network of State or
 Local Air Monitoring Stations
 (SLAMS) and National Air
 Monitoring Stations (NAMS).
Letter from the MassDEP dated    Statewide........  12/30/1993.......  7/14/1997, 62 FR   ......................
 December 30, 1993 submitting a                                         37510
 revision to the SIP.
The Commonwealth, committed in   Statewide........  3/3/1997.........  7/14/1997, 62 FR   ......................
 a letter dated March 3, 1997                                           37510
 to correct deficiencies for an
 enhanced motor vehicle
 inspection and maintenance (I/
 M) program within one year of
 conditional interim approval
 by EPA.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  10/17/1997.......  4/11/2000, 65 FR   ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           19323
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  7/30/1996........  4/11/2000, 65 FR   ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           19323
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  8/9/2000.........  12/18/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           78974
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  9/11/2000........  12/18/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           78974
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP dated    Statewide........  7/25/1995........  12/18/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           78974
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  2/17/1993........  9/2/1999, 64 FR    ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           48297
 SIP.

Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  12/19/1997.......  6/2/1999, 64 FR    ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           29567
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  3/9/1998.........  6/2/1999, 64 FR    ......................
 clarifying the program                                                 29567
 implementation process.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  7/15/1994........  9/2/1999, 64 FR    ......................
 submitting revisions to the                                            48095
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  10/4/1996........  9/2/1999, 64 FR    ......................
 submitting revisions to the                                            48095
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  12/2/1996........  9/2/1999, 64 FR    ......................
 submitting revisions to the                                            48095
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  1/11/1999........  9/2/1999, 64 FR    ......................
 submitting revisions to the                                            48095
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  4/16/1999........  9/2/1999, 64 FR    ......................
 submitting revisions to the                                            48095
 SIP.
Nonregulatory portions of the    Statewide........  1/11/1995........  4/11/2000, 65 FR   ......................
 SIP submittal.                                                         19323
Nonregulatory portions of the    Statewide........  3/29/1995........  4/11/2000, 65 FR   ......................
 SIP submittal.                                                         19323
A September 17, 1999, Notice of  Statewide........  9/17/1999........  11/15/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 Correction submitted by the                                            68898
 Secretary of State indicating
 the effective date of the
 regulations.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  5/14/1999........  11/15/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           68898
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  2/1/2000.........  11/15/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           68898
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  3/15/2000........  11/15/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 submitting a revision to the                                           68898
 SIP.
Test Procedures and Equipment    Statewide........  2/1/2000.........  11/15/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 Specifications.                                                        68898
Acceptance Test Protocol.......  Statewide........  3/15/2000........  11/15/2000, 65 FR  ......................
                                                                        68898
Letter from the Commonwealth of  Statewide........  11/19/1999.......  12/27/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 Massachusetts, Executive                                               81743
 Office of Environmental
 Affairs, Department of
 Environmental Protection
 submitting an amendment to SIP.
Background Document and          Statewide........  7/1/1999.........  12/27/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 Technical Support for Public                                           81743
 Hearings on the Proposed
 Revisions to the SIP for
 Ozone, July, 1999.
Supplemental Background          Statewide........  9/1/1999.........  12/27/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 Document and Technical Support                                         81743
 for Public Hearings on
 Modifications to the July 1999
 Proposal to Revise the SIP for
 Ozone, September, 1999.
Table of Unit Allocations......  Statewide........  9/1/1999.........  12/27/2000, 65 FR  ......................
                                                                        81743
Letter from the MassDEP........  Statewide........  4/10/2002........  6/20/2003, 68 FR   ......................
                                                                        36921
The SIP narrative ``Technical    Statewide........  3/21/2002........  6/20/2003, 68 FR   ......................
 Support Document for Public                                            36921
 Hearings on Revisions to the
 State Implementation Plan for
 Ozone for Massachusetts,
 Amendments to Statewide
 Projected Inventory for
 Nitrogen Oxides,'' dated March
 2002.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  7/15/1994........  10/27/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 submitting revisions to the                                            64360
 SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  3/29/1995........  10/27/2000, 65 FR  ......................
 submitting revisions to the                                            64360
 SIP.
Plan Approval issued by the      Statewide........  6/17/1999........  10/4/2002, 67 FR   ......................
 MassDEP to the Gillette                                                62179
 Company Andover Manufacturing
 Plant.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  4/16/1999........  10/4/2002, 67 FR   ......................
 submitting negative                                                    62179
 declarations for certain VOC
 source categories.
Letter from the MassDEP          Statewide........  7/24/2002........  10/4/2002, 67 FR   ......................
 discussing wood furniture                                              62179
 manufacturing and aerospace
 coating requirements in
 Massachusetts.
Letter from the MassDEP          Metropolitan       12/8/2000........  3/12/2001, 66 FR   ......................
 submitting a revision to the     Boston.                               14318
 SIP.

Letter from the MassDEP          Metropolitan       12/26/2000.......  3/12/2001, 66 FR   ......................
 submitting the final state       Boston.                               14318
 certified copies of State
 regulations 310 CMR 7.30
 ``Massport/Logan Airport
 Parking Freeze'' and 310 CMR
 7.31 ``City of Boston/East
 Boston Parking Freeze.''.
Letter from the MassDEP, in      Statewide........  8/9/2002.........  12/23/2002, 67 FR  ......................
 which it submitted the Low                                             78179
 Emission Vehicle Program
 adopted on December 24, 1999.
Letter from the MassDEP which    Statewide........  8/26/2002........  12/23/2002, 67 FR  ......................
 clarified the August 9, 2002                                           78179
 submittal to exclude certain
 sections of the Low Emission
 Vehicle Program from
 consideration.
Letter from the MassDEP          Metropolitan       7/12/2006........  2/15/2008, 73 FR   ......................
 submitting a revision to the     Boston.                               8818
 SIP.
Massachusetts Regulation Filing  Metropolitan       12/13/2005.......  2/15/2008, 73 FR   ......................
 amending 310 CMR 7.38 entitled   Boston.                               8818
 ``Certification of Tunnel
 Ventilation Systems in the
 Metropolitan Boston Air
 Pollution Control District.''.
Massachusetts Regulation Filing  Statewide........  4/19/2007........  12/3/2007, 72 FR   ......................
 amending 310 CMR 7.28 entitled                                         67854
 ``NOx Allowance Trading
 Program,'' and adopting 310
 CMR 7.32 entitled
 ``Massachusetts Clean Air
 Interstate Rule (Mass CAIR).''.
Massachusetts Regulation Filing  Metropolitan       11/16/2006.......  7/31/2008, 73 FR   ......................
 substantiating December 1,       Boston.                               44654
 2006, State effective date for
 amended 310 CMR 7.00 entitled
 ``Definition,'' (addition of
 term ``Boston Metropolitan
 Planning Organization,'' which
 appears on the replaced page
 173 of the State's Code of
 Massachusetts Regulations,)
 and 310 CMR 7.36 entitled
 ``Transit System
 Improvements.''.
Letter from the MassDEP dated    Metropolitan       12/13/2006.......  7/31/2008, 73 FR   ......................
 December 13, 2006 submitting a   Boston.                               44654
 revision to the SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP          Metropolitan       6/1/2007.........  7/31/2008, 73 FR   ......................
 submitting a revision to the     Boston.                               44654
 SIP.
Letter from the Massachusetts    Metropolitan       9/4/2007.........  7/31/2008, 73 FR   ......................
 Executive Office of              Boston.                               44654
 Transportation identifying its
 commitment to the Green Line
 extension and to make every
 effort to accelerate the
 planning, design and
 environmental review and
 permitting of the project in
 order to work towards the 2014
 completion date.
Letter from the Chair of the     Metropolitan       5/1/2008.........  7/31/2008, 73 FR   ......................
 Boston Region Metropolitan       Boston.                               44654
 Planning Organization
 concurring in the finding that
 the transit system
 improvements projects will
 achieve emission benefits
 equivalent to or greater than
 the benefits from the original
 transit system improvements
 projects being replaced.
Letter from EPA New England      Metropolitan       7/5/2008.........  7/31/2008, 73 FR   ......................
 Regional Administrator           Boston.                               44654
 concurring in the finding that
 the transit system
 improvements projects will
 achieve emission benefits
 equivalent to or greater than
 the benefits from the original
 transit system improvements
 projects being replaced.
Letter from the MassDEP, dated   Statewide........  6/1/2009.........  01/25/2013, 78 FR  ......................
 June 1, 2009, submitting a                                             5292
 revision to the SIP.
Letter from the MassDEP, dated   Statewide........  11/30/2009.......  01/25/2013, 78 FR  ......................
 November 30, 2009, amending                                            5292
 the June 1, 2009 SIP submittal.

Massachusetts June 1, 2009 SIP   Statewide........  6/1/2009.........  01/25/2013, 78 FR  ......................
 Revision Table of Contents                                             5292
 Item 7, ``Documentation of IM
 SIP Revision consistent with
 42 USC Section 7511a and
 Section 182(c)(3)(A) of the
 Clean Air Act.''.
``Massachusetts Regional Haze    Statewide........  8/9/2012.........  9/19/2013, 78 FR   ......................
 State Implementation Plan''                                            57487
 dated August 9, 2012.
A letter from the MassDEP dated  Statewide........  8/9/2001.........  4/24/2014, 79 FR   ......................
 August 9, 2001 submitting a                                            22774
 revision to the SIP.
A letter from the MassDEP dated  Statewide........  9/14/2006........  4/24/2014, 79 FR   ......................
 September 14, 2006 submitting                                          22774
 a revision to the SIP.
A letter from the MassDEP dated  Statewide........  2/13/2008........  4/24/2014, 79 FR   ......................
 February 13, 2008 submitting a                                         22774
 revision to the SIP.
A letter from the MassDEP dated  Statewide........  1/18/2013........  4/24/2014, 79 FR   ......................
 January 18, 2013 withdrawing                                           22774
 certain outdated and obsolete
 regulation submittals and
 replacing them with currently
 effective versions of the
 regulation for approval and
 inclusion into the SIP.
A letter from the MassDEP dated  Statewide........  11/6/2013........  12/8/2015, 80 FR   ......................
 November 6, 2013 submitting a                                          76225
 revision to the SIP.
A letter from the MassDEP dated  Statewide........  5/5/2015.........  11/29/2016, 81 FR  ......................
 May 5, 2015 submitting a                                               85897
 revision to the SIP.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ To determine the EPA effective date for a specific provision listed in this table, consult the Federal
  Register notice cited in this column for the particular provision.

[FR Doc. 2018-01513 Filed 1-26-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


ÿWPCL
ûÿ2BJ#|xÐ°°ÐÐÐÐÐØ	pÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ°ÐÐÃÃFrom: ÄÄÁØ	Ø	ÁDeborah Bartram
ÃÃTo:ÄÄÁØ	Ø<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>ÃÃDate: ÄÄÁØ	Ø	ÁThu, Dec 6, 2007  4:22 PM
ÃÃSubject: ÄÄÁØ	Ø	ÁFwd: Steam Electric Data Request Response Followup

ÐÐ°`	¸hÀpÈ 	x
Ð (#€%Ø'0*ˆ,à.813è5@8˜:ð<H? AøCPF¨HKXM°OR`T¸VYh[À]`°ÐÐFred and Robin,

Thank you so much for the productive call today to discuss questions on the Mayo plant.  I have attached documentation of the responses we discussed.  Please let me know if you have any comments or corrections to these items.  In addition, I reviewed the outstanding questions for the Asheville and Roxboro plants, and attempted to identify questions that were similar to Mayo.  These revised questions are attached as well.  Please let me know when we can schedule a call(s) to discuss responses for Asheville and Roxboro.

Again, thank you for your responses and I look forward to hearing from you!
Deb Bartram

>>> Deborah Bartram 11/26/2007 11:09:29 AM >>>

Mr. Holt,

I am with Eastern Research Group, the contractor supporting EPA on the ÃÃData Request for the Steam Electric Power Generating IndustryÄÄ.  Thank you very much for your data request response.  I have reviewed your response and would like to discuss with you some of the information you provided to ensure that we have an accurate understanding of your plant processes.  I have attached a list of questions for each of your plants that I would like to discuss with you by phone.  Please let me know if you are available for a phone call this week either on Wednesday (11/28) before 3 p.m., or Friday (11/30) after 11 a.m.  If these times are not convenient for you, or if you would like additional time to investigate the questions, please suggest alternative dates and times for the call.  Please feel free to contact me by phone or email with questions.  Thank you in advance for your time.

Deb Bartram

_____________________________________________________
Deb Bartram
Vice President
ERG
14555 Avion Parkway, Suite 200
Chantilly, VA 20151
(703) 633-1669
(703) 263-7479 fax
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

ÐÐØ	ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ°ÐÐ
ÃÃCC:ÄÄÁØ	Ø	ÁJosh Hall;  Ron Jordan