[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 180 (Tuesday, September 17, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48978-48981]
[FR Doc No: 2019-20018]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-86938; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2019-048]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing of Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, To Establish the ``Midpoint Extended Life Order
+ Continuous Book'' as a New Order Type

September 11, 2019.

I. Introduction

    On May 29, 2019, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Exchange'' or
``Nasdaq'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to establish the Midpoint Extended Life Order +
Continuous Book (``M-ELO+CB'') as a new order type. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on June 17,
2019.\3\ On July 1, 2019, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change, which amended and superseded the proposed rule
change as originally filed. On July 30, 2019, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the Commission designated a longer period
within which to approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove the proposed rule change.\5\ On July 31, 2019, the

Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed rule change, which
amended and superseded the proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1.\6\ On August 30, 2019, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 3 to the proposed rule change.\7\ The Commission received no
comment letters on the proposed rule change. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit comments on Amendment Nos. 2 and 3
from interested persons, and is approving the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86083 (June 11,
2019), 84 FR 28107.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86512, 84 FR 38078
(August 5, 2019). The Commission designated September 15, 2019 as
the date by which the Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the
proposed rule change.
    \6\ In Amendment No. 2, the Exchange revised the proposal to:
(1) Explain in greater detail the order entry protocols available
for M-ELO+CBs; (2) provide additional specificity about the resting
period for midpoint orders; (3) provide additional specificity about
the execution priority of M-ELO+CBs, M-ELOs, and midpoint orders;
(4) conform the proposal to a recently approved proposed rule change
permitting M-ELOs to be entered in odd-lot sizes; (5) specify that
any punitive fees or participant requirements determined to be
necessary by the Exchange for M-ELO+CB usage would be implemented
pursuant to a future proposed rule change; and (6) make technical,
clarifying, and conforming changes. Amendment No. 2 is available at
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2019-048/srnasdaq2019048-5898749-188829.pdf.
    \7\ In Amendment No. 3, the Exchange further revised the
proposal to: (1) Clarify that the statistical information it
proposes to publish for M-ELO+CBs would be aggregated with the
statistical information it currently publishes for M-ELOs; (2)
clarify the circumstances in which modification of a M-ELO+CB or
midpoint order would trigger a new holding or resting period; and
(3) make technical and conforming changes. Amendment No. 3 is
available at https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2019-048/srnasdaq2019048-6049836-191368.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    Currently, the Exchange offers the Midpoint Extended Life Order
(``M-ELO'').\8\ A M-ELO is a non-displayed order priced at the midpoint
between the National Best Bid and National Best Offer (``NBBO'') that
is not eligible for execution until it completes a one-half second
holding period (``Holding Period'').\9\ Once eligible to trade, M-ELOs
may only execute against other M-ELOs.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Rule 4702(b)(14)(A). See also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 82825 (March 7, 2018), 83 FR 10937 (March 13, 2018)
(``Original M-ELO Approval Order'') (order approving SR-NASDAQ-2017-
074).
    \9\ See Rule 4702(b)(14)(A).
    \10\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to adopt M-ELO+CB as a variation on the
M-ELO concept. That is, a M-ELO+CB would be an order type that has all
of the characteristics and attributes of a M-ELO, except that, in
addition to executing against other M-ELO+CBs and M-ELOs, it would also
be able to execute against certain ``M-ELO-like'' orders on the
Exchange's continuous book.\11\ Specifically, a M-ELO+CB would be
subject to the same one-half second Holding Period as a M-ELO. A M-
ELO+CB that satisfies the Holding Period would be eligible to execute,
at the NBBO midpoint, against other eligible M-ELO+CBs and eligible M-
ELOs.\12\ However, unlike a M-ELO, the M-ELO+CB would also be eligible
to execute, at the NBBO midpoint, against non-displayed orders with
midpoint pegging and midpoint peg post-only orders (collectively,
``Midpoint Orders'') resting on the Exchange's continuous book, if: (1)
The Midpoint Order has the midpoint trade now order attribute enabled;
\13\ (2) the Midpoint Order has rested on the continuous book for at
least one-half second after the NBBO midpoint falls within the limit
price set by the participant; \14\ (3) no other order is resting on the
continuous book that has a more aggressive price than the current NBBO
midpoint; and (4) the Midpoint Order satisfies any minimum quantity
requirement of the M-ELO+CB.\15\ A buy (sell) M-ELO+CB would be ranked
in time order at the NBBO midpoint among other buy (sell) M-ELO+CBs,
buy (sell) M-ELOs, and buy (sell) Midpoint Orders, as of the time when
such orders become eligible to execute (i.e., the time at which they
exit their respective one-half second Holding Periods or resting
periods, as applicable, and satisfy any other conditions for
marketability).\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See proposed Rule 4702(b)(15). Also, unlike M-ELOs, M-
ELO+CBs may be entered via any of the Exchange's order entry
protocols except for QIX. See id.; Amendment No. 2, supra note 6, at
5 n.6, 7. The type of protocol used would not affect how the system
handles M-ELO+CBs. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 6, at 7.
    \12\ See proposed Rule 4702(b)(15).
    \13\ The midpoint trade now order attribute currently allows a
resting order that becomes locked at its non-displayed price by an
incoming midpoint peg post-only order to automatically execute
against crossing or locking interest, including potentially against
the locking midpoint peg post-only order, as a liquidity taker. See
Rule 4703(n). The Exchange proposes to amend the midpoint trade now
order attribute to provide that, in addition to the functionality
the attribute currently provides, enabling the attribute would also
permit a Midpoint Order to execute against a M-ELO+CB, provided that
the Midpoint Order meets the eligibility requirements for doing so.
See proposed Rule 4703(n). The Exchange also proposes to specify
that, if there is a resting Midpoint Order on the Nasdaq book
without the midpoint trade now order attribute, a new incoming
Midpoint Order with the midpoint trade now order attribute will be
able to execute against a M-ELO+CB (after meeting the eligibility
requirements). See id. The resting Midpoint Order without the
midpoint trade now order attribute will thereafter remain on the
Nasdaq book and retain its priority relative to other resting orders
on the same side of the market. See id.
    \14\ If a Midpoint Order with the midpoint trade now order
attribute enabled is modified during its resting period or after its
resting period elapses, other than to decrease the size of the order
or to modify the marking of a sell order as long, short, or short
exempt, such modification would trigger a new resting period for the
Midpoint Order. See Amendment No. 3, supra note 7, at 4.
    \15\ See proposed Rule 4702(b)(15).
    \16\ See id.; Amendment No. 2, supra note 6, at 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In all other respects, a M-ELO+CB would be identical to a M-ELO.
For example, a M-ELO+CB may be assigned a limit price, in which case it
would be: (1) Eligible for execution in time priority after satisfying
the Holding Period if, upon acceptance of the order by the system, the
midpoint price is within the limit price set by the participant; or (2)
held until the midpoint falls within the limit price set by the
participant, at which time the Holding Period would commence and
thereafter the system would make the order eligible for execution in
time priority.\17\ If a M-ELO+CB is modified by a member (other than to
decrease the size of the order or to modify the marking of a sell order
as long, short, or short exempt) during the Holding Period, the system
would restart the Holding Period.\18\ If a M-ELO+CB is modified by a
member (other than to decrease the size of the order or to modify the
marking of a sell order as long, short, or short exempt) after it is
eligible to execute, the order would have to satisfy a new Holding
Period to become eligible to execute. If the NBBO changes while a M-
ELO+CB is in the Holding Period, the Holding Period would not reset,
even if, as a result of the NBBO change, the M-ELO+CB's limit price is
less aggressive than the NBBO midpoint.\19\ If a M-ELO+CB satisfies the
Holding Period, but the NBBO midpoint is no longer within its limit, it
would nonetheless be ranked in time priority among other M-ELO+CBs, M-
ELOs, and Midpoint Orders if the NBBO later moves such that the
midpoint is within the order's limit price (i.e., the Holding Period
would not reset).\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 6, at 6-7.
    \18\ See id. at 7.
    \19\ See id.
    \20\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    If there is no National Best Bid or National Best Offer, the
Exchange would accept M-ELO+CBs but would not allow M-ELO+CB executions
until there is an NBBO.\21\ M-ELO+CBs would be eligible to execute if
the NBBO is locked.\22\ If the NBBO is crossed, M-ELO+CBs would be held
by the system until the NBBO is no longer crossed, at which time they
would be eligible to

trade.\23\ M-ELO+CBs may be cancelled at any time, including during the
Holding Period.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \21\ See id.
    \22\ See id.
    \23\ See id.
    \24\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    M-ELO+CBs would only be active during market hours.\25\
Specifically, M-ELO+CBs entered during pre-market hours would be held
by the system in time priority until market hours begin, M-ELO+CBs
entered during post-market hours would not be accepted by the system,
and M-ELO+CBs remaining unexecuted after 4:00 p.m. Eastern time would
be cancelled by the system.\26\ M-ELO+CBs would not be eligible for the
Exchange's opening, halt, and closing crosses.\27\ M-ELO+CBs may be
entered in any size and may have a minimum quantity order
attribute.\28\ M-ELO+CBs may not be designated with a time-in-force of
immediate or cancel, are ineligible for routing, and may not have the
discretion, reserve size, attribution, intermarket sweep order,
display, trade now, or midpoint trade now order attributes.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ See id.
    \26\ See id. at 7-8.
    \27\ See proposed Rule 4703(l).
    \28\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 6, at 8. See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 86416 (July 19, 2019), 84 FR
35918 (July 25, 2019) (order approving SR-NASDAQ-2019-044 to allow
M-ELOs to be odd lot-sized).
    \29\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 6, at 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    M-ELO+CB executions would be reported to securities information
processors and provided in the Exchange's proprietary data feed without
any new or special indication.\30\ The Exchange would, however, include
in its existing volume reports delayed weekly aggregated statistics, as
well as delayed monthly aggregated block-sized trading statistics, for
M-ELO+CB executions.\31\ Specifically, the Exchange would include M-
ELO+CB executions in the existing reports it publishes on
Nasdaqtrader.com that provide weekly aggregated statistics showing the
number of shares and transactions of M-ELOs executed on the Exchange by
security.\32\ The Exchange would also include M-ELO+CB executions in
the existing reports it publishes on Nasdaqtrader.com that provide
monthly aggregated block-sized trading statistics of total shares and
total transactions of M-ELOs executed on the Exchange.\33\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ See id.
    \31\ See id.
    \32\ See id.; Amendment No. 3, supra note 7, at 5, 8 (clarifying
that the weekly statistical information published by the Exchange
would aggregate both M-ELO and M-ELO+CB executions). This
information would be published with a two-week delay for NMS stocks
in Tier 1 of the LULD Plan, and a four-week delay for all other NMS
stocks. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 6, at 8.
    \33\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 6, at 8-9; Amendment No. 3,
supra note 7, at 5, 8 (clarifying that the monthly statistical
information published by the Exchange would aggregate both M-ELO and
M-ELO+CB executions). A transaction would be considered ``block-
sized'' if it meets any of the following criteria: (1) 10,000 or
more shares; (2) $200,000 or more in value; (3) 10,000 or more
shares and $200,000 or more in value; (4) 2,000 to 9,999 shares; (5)
$100,000 to $199,999 in value; or (6) 2,000 to 9,999 shares and
$100,000 to $199,999 in value. See Amendment No. 2, supra note 6, at
9. This information would be published no earlier than one month
following the end of the month for which trading was aggregated. See
id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange represents that, as part of the surveillance it
currently performs, M-ELO+CBs would be subject to real-time
surveillance to determine if they are being abused by market
participants.\34\ In addition, as is the case for M-ELOs, the Exchange
represents that it will monitor the use of M-ELO+CBs with the intent to
apply additional measures, as necessary, to ensure their usage is
appropriately tied to the intent of the order type.\35\ According to
the Exchange, manipulative abuse is subject to potential disciplinary
action under the Exchange's rules, and other behavior that is not
necessarily manipulative but nonetheless frustrates the purposes of the
M-ELO+CB order type may be subject to penalties or other participant
requirements to discourage such behavior, should it occur.\36\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \34\ See Amendment No. 2, supra note 6, at 9.
    \35\ See id. The Exchange states that this monitoring may
include metrics tied to participant behavior, such as the percentage
of M-ELO+CBs that are cancelled prior to the completion of the
Holding Period, the average duration of M-ELO+CBs, and the
percentage of M-ELO+CBs where the NBBO midpoint is within the limit
price when received. See id.
    \36\ See id. Should the Exchange determine that they are
necessary to maintain a fair and orderly market, any punitive fees
or other participant requirements tied to M-ELO+CB usage would be
implemented by rule filing under Section 19(b) of the Act. See id.
at 9 n.11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange plans to implement M-ELO+CB within thirty days after
its approval, and will announce the specific implementation date by
Equity Trader Alert.\37\ The Exchange states that it will make M-ELO+CB
available to all members and to all securities upon implementation.\38\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \37\ See id. at 11. The Exchange notes that it plans to propose
a fee structure for M-ELO+CB in a subsequent proposed rule change.
See id. at 11 n.13.
    \38\ See id. at 11.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, is consistent with the
requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder
applicable to a national securities exchange.\39\ In particular, the
Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\40\ which requires, among other things,
that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest, and that the rules are not designed
to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or
dealers; and Section 6(b)(8) of the Act,\41\ which requires that the
rules of a national securities exchange not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \39\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \40\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \41\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission has carefully considered the proposal and finds that
it is consistent with the Act. In its original order approving M-ELO on
the Exchange, the Commission noted its belief that the M-ELO order type
could create additional and more efficient trading opportunities on the
Exchange for investors with longer investment time horizons, including
institutional investors, and could provide these investors with an
ability to limit the information leakage and the market impact that
could result from their orders.\42\ While M-ELOs are currently limited
to executing only against other M-ELOs, the Commission believes that
the Exchange's proposal to introduce M-ELO+CBs, which would be able to
interact with eligible Midpoint Orders, in addition to M-ELO+CBs and M-
ELOs, could create opportunities for Exchange participants to utilize a
variation of the M-ELO order type consistent with the intended purpose
of the order type. In particular, the proposal would provide Exchange
participants with the flexibility to allow their orders to interact
with ``M-ELO-like'' interest on the Exchange's order book. As with M-
ELOs, the Commission believes that M-ELO+CBs represent a reasonable
effort to further enhance the

ability of longer-term trading interest to participate effectively on
an exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \42\ See Original M-ELO Approval Order, supra note 8, at 10938-
39.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission also believes that the proposal to use the midpoint
trade now order attribute to allow Midpoint Orders to execute against
M-ELO+CBs would provide Exchange participants entering Midpoint Orders
with additional control over the execution of their orders,
specifically by allowing participants to choose whether to enable the
order attribute in order to execute against M-ELO+CBs.
    The Commission believes that the proposal to include M-ELO+CB
executions in the Exchange's published statistics for M-ELO executions
is reasonably designed to provide additional transparency regarding M-
ELO+CB executions on the Exchange without undermining the usefulness of
the M-ELO and M-ELO+CB order types by limiting the potential
information leakage and the resulting market impact that could be
associated with non-delayed identification of individual M-ELO or M-
ELO+CB executions.
    Finally, the Commission believes that the Exchange's proposed
surveillance measures are reasonably designed to deter potential
improper use of the proposed M-ELO+CB order type. In particular, the
Commission notes that the Exchange has represented that, as it does for
M-ELOs, it will conduct real-time surveillance to monitor the use of M-
ELO+CBs and ensure that such usage is appropriately tied to the intent
of the order type.\43\ The Exchange has also represented that it will
continue to evaluate whether additional measures may be necessary to
ensure that M-ELO+CBs are used in a manner consistent with the intended
purpose of the order type.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \43\ See Amendment No 2, supra note 6, at 9.
    \44\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on the foregoing and the Exchange's representations in its
proposal, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, is consistent with the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments on Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 to the Proposed
Rule Change

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning whether Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 are consistent with
the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2019-048 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2019-048. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2019-048, and should be submitted
on or before October 8, 2019.

V. Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment Nos. 2 and 3

    The Commission finds good cause to approve the proposed rule
change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, prior to the thirtieth
day after the date of publication of notice of the filing of Amendment
Nos. 2 and 3 in the Federal Register. As discussed above, in Amendment
No. 2, the Exchange revised the proposal to: (1) Explain in greater
detail the order entry protocols available for M-ELO+CBs; (2) provide
additional specificity about the resting period for Midpoint Orders;
(3) provide additional specificity about the execution priority of M-
ELO+CBs, M-ELOs, and Midpoint Orders; (4) conform the proposal to a
recently approved proposed rule change permitting M-ELOs to be entered
in odd-lot sizes; (5) specify that any punitive fees or participant
requirements determined to be necessary by the Exchange for M-ELO+CB
usage would be implemented pursuant to a future proposed rule change;
and (6) make technical, clarifying, and conforming changes. Also as
discussed above, in Amendment No. 3, the Exchange further revised the
proposal to: (1) Clarify that the statistical information it proposes
to publish for M-ELO+CBs would be aggregated with the statistical
information it currently publishes for M-ELOs; (2) clarify the
circumstances in which modification of a M-ELO+CB or Midpoint Order
would trigger a new holding or resting period; and (3) make technical
and conforming changes. The Commission believes that Amendment Nos. 2
and 3 do not raise any novel regulatory issues or make any significant
substantive changes to the original proposal, which was subject to a
full notice and comment period during which no comments were received.
The Commission also notes that Amendment Nos. 2 and 3 provide
additional accuracy, clarity, and justification to the proposal.
Accordingly, the Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,\45\ to approve the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \45\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

VI. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\46\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2019-048), as
modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3, be, and hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \46\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\47\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \47\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-20018 Filed 9-16-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 60 (Friday, March 28, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17580-17581]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06936]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

[Docket No. OSHA-2013-0007]

Maritime Advisory Committee for Occupational Safety and Health
(MACOSH)

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), Labor.

ACTION: Notice of MACOSH Meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This Federal Register notice announces meetings of the full
Committee and the workgroups on April 15 and 16, 2014, in Washington,
DC.

DATES: MACOSH meeting: MACOSH will meet from 9 a.m. until approximately
5 p.m. on April 15 and 16, 2014.
    Submission of comments, requests to speak, and requests for special
accommodation: Submit written comments, requests to speak at the full
Committee meeting, and requests for special accommodations for these
meetings (postmarked, sent, or transmitted) by April 1, 2014.

ADDRESSES: The Committee and workgroups will meet at the U.S.
Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2 Massachusetts Avenue
NE., Washington, DC 20210, Conference Rooms 4 and 8. Meeting attendees
must use the entrance on the 1st Street side of the building.
    Submitting comments and requests to speak: Submit comments and
requests to speak at the MACOSH meetings, identified by the docket
number for this Federal Register notice (Docket No. OSHA 2013-0007), by
one of the following methods:
    Electronically: Submit comments and attachments electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov, which is the Federal eRulemaking Portal.
Follow the instructions online for submitting comments.
    Facsimile: If comments, including attachments, are not longer than
10

pages, commenters may fax them to the OSHA Docket Office at (202) 693-
1648.
    Regular mail, express mail, hand (courier) delivery, and messenger
service: When using this method, submit a copy of comments and
attachments to the OSHA Docket Office, Docket No. OSHA-2013-0007, U.S.
Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration,
Room N-2625, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210. The
Docket Office accepts deliveries (express mail, hand (courier)
delivery, and messenger service) during the Department of Labor's and
Docket Office's normal business hours, 8:15 a.m. to 4:45 p.m., e.t.
    Requests for special accommodations: Submit requests for special
accommodations for MACOSH and its workgroup meetings by hard copy,
telephone, or email to: Ms. Gretta Jameson, OSHA, Office of
Communications, Room N-3647, U.S. Department of Labor, 200 Constitution
Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Instructions: All submissions must include the Agency name and
docket number for this Federal Register notice (Docket No. OSHA-2013-
0007). Because of security-related procedures, submissions by regular
mail may result in a significant delay in receipt. Please contact the
OSHA Docket Office for information about security procedures for making
submissions by express mail, hand (courier) delivery, and messenger
service.
    OSHA will place comments and requests to speak, including personal
information, in the public docket which may be available online.
Therefore, OSHA cautions interested parties about submitting personal
information such as Social Security numbers and birthdates.
    Docket: To read or download documents in the public docket for this
MACOSH meeting, go to http://www.regulations.gov. All documents in the
public docket are listed in the index; however, some documents (e.g.,
copyrighted material) are not publicly available to read or download
through http://www.regulations.gov. All submissions are available for
inspection and, when permitted, copying at the OSHA Docket Office at
the above address. For information on using http://www.regulations.gov
to make submissions or to access the docket, click on the ``Help'' tab
at the top of the Home page. Contact the OSHA Docket Office for
information about materials not available through that Web site and for
assistance in using the Internet to locate submissions and other
documents in the docket.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For press inquiries: Frank Meilinger,
Director, OSHA Office of Communications, U.S. Department of Labor, Room
N-3647, 200 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20210; telephone:
(202) 693-1999; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    For general information about MACOSH and this meeting: Mrs. Amy
Wangdahl, Director, Office of Maritime and Agriculture, OSHA, U.S.
Department of Labor, Room N-3609, 200 Constitution Avenue NW.,
Washington, DC 20210; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Copies of this Federal Register notice: Electronic copies of this
Federal Register notice are available at http://www.regulations.gov.
This notice, as well as news releases and other relevant information,
are also available at OSHA's Web page at: http://www.osha.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: All MACOSH committee and workgroup meetings
are open to the public. Interested persons may attend the full
Committee and its workgroup meetings at the time and place listed
above. The agenda will include discussions on: OSHA updates
(Directorates of Standards and Guidance, Enforcement, Cooperative and
State Programs, and Technical Support and Emergency Management); the
Federal Advisory Committee Act; Advisory Committee ethics;
administrative procedures (travel); and Committee items of interest
proposed at the meeting.
    The workgroups, which include the Longshoring workgroup and the
Shipyard workgroup, will meet from 9 a.m. until approximately 5 p.m. on
April 15, 2014, in Conference Rooms 4 and 8. The workgroups will
discuss items of interest, as well as other topics that may arise
during the remainder of the current Committee charter. The full
Committee will meet from 9 a.m. until about 5 p.m. on April 16, 2014,
in Conference Room 7 and 8.
    Public Participation: Any individual attending the MACOSH meeting,
including the workgroup meetings, at the U.S. Department of Labor,
Bureau of Labor Statistics, must use the entrance of the 1st Street
side of the building and pass through Building Security. Attendees must
have valid government-issued photo identification to enter the
building. Please contact Vanessa Welch at<PHONE_NUMBER> (email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for additional information about building
security measures for attending the MACOSH Committee and workgroup
meetings. Interested parties may submit a request to make an oral
presentation to MACOSH by any one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section above. The request must state the amount of time
requested to speak, the interest represented (e.g., organization name),
if any, and a brief outline of the presentation. The MACOSH Chair has
discretion to grant requests to address the full Committee as time
permits.
    Interested parties also may submit written comments, including data
and other information, using any one of the methods listed in the
ADDRESSES section above. OSHA will provide all submissions to MACOSH
members prior to the meeting. Individuals who need special
accommodations to attend the MACOSH meeting should contact Gretta
Jameson as specified above under the heading ``Requests for special
accommodations'' in the ADDRESSES section.

Authority and Signature

    David Michaels, Ph.D., MPH, Assistant Secretary of Labor for
Occupational Safety and Health, authorized the preparation of this
notice under the authority granted by 29 U.S.C. 655, 656, 5 U.S.C. App.
2, Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR 3912), and 29 CFR part
1912.

    Signed at Washington, DC, on March 24, 2014.
David Michaels,
Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2014-06936 Filed 3-27-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 187 (Thursday, September 30, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 54219]
[FR Doc No: 2021-21311]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2020-N-0026]

Issuance of Priority Review Voucher; Rare Pediatric Disease
Product

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
issuance of a priority review voucher to the sponsor of a rare
pediatric disease product application. The Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act) authorizes FDA to award priority review
vouchers to sponsors of approved rare pediatric disease product
applications that meet certain criteria. FDA is required to publish
notice of the award of the priority review voucher. FDA has determined
that RETHYMIC (allogeneic processed thymus tissue-agdc), manufactured
by Enzyvant Therapeutics, GmbH, meets the criteria for a priority
review voucher.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Myrna Hanna, Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 71, Rm. 7301, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 240-
402-7911.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FDA is announcing the issuance of a priority
review voucher to the sponsor of an approved rare pediatric disease
product application. Under section 529 of the FD&C Act (21 U.S.C.
360ff), FDA will award priority review vouchers to sponsors of approved
rare pediatric disease product applications that meet certain criteria.
FDA has determined that RETHYMIC (allogeneic processed thymus tissue-
agdc), manufactured by Enzyvant Therapeutics, GmbH, meets the criteria
for a priority review voucher. RETHYMIC (allogeneic processed thymus
tissue-agdc) is indicated for immune reconstitution in pediatric
patients with congenital athymia.
    For further information about the Rare Pediatric Disease Priority
Review Voucher Program and for a link to the full text of section 529
of the FD&C Act, go to https://www.fda.gov/industry/developing-products-rare-diseases-conditions/rare-pediatric-disease-rpd-designation-and-voucher-programs. For further information about
RETHYMIC (allogeneic processed thymus tissue-agdc), go to the Center
for Biologics Evaluation and Research Cellular and Gene Therapy
Products website at https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/cellular-gene-therapy-products/approved-cellular-and-gene-therapy-products.

    Dated: September 21, 2021.
Lauren K. Roth,
Acting Principal Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2021-21311 Filed 9-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 13, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 10809-10811]
[FR Doc No: 2018-05012]

========================================================================
Proposed Rules
                                                Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________

This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.

========================================================================

Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 13, 2018 /
Proposed Rules

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2018-0189; Product Identifier 2017-CE-022-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Viking Air Limited Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
Viking Air Limited Model DHC-3 airplanes. This proposed AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an
aviation authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as pitting corrosion on the shank of the wing strut attach
bolts. We are issuing this proposed AD to require actions to address
the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 27, 2018.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Viking Air Limited Technical Support, 1959 De Havilland Way, Sidney,
British Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; telephone: (North America) (800)
663-8444; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email: [email protected];
internet: http://www.vikingair.com/support/service-bulletins. You may
review this referenced service information at the FAA, Policy and
Innovation Division, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (816)
329-4148.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0189; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The street address for the Docket
Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is in the ADDRESSES section. Comments
will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2018-0189;
Product Identifier 2017-CE-022-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We will consider
all comments received by the closing date and may amend this proposed
AD because of those comments.
    We will post all comments we receive, without change, to http://regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.

Discussion

    Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada, has
issued AD Number CF-2017-11, dated March 9, 2017 (referred to after
this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for Viking Air
Limited Model DHC-3 airplanes and was based on mandatory continuing
airworthiness information originated by an aviation authority of
another country. The MCAI states:

    Pitting corrosion has been found on the shank of the following
part number wing strut attach bolts: C3W114-3, C3W129-3 and C3W128-
3. These bolts are manufactured using a standard AN12 bolt.
Metallurgical evaluation concluded that pitting corrosion was
present on the affected AN12 bolts prior to forming of the bolt head
and threads. The pitting and un-plated voids could cause a surface
condition that may have a detrimental effect on fatigue and
corrosion resistance, leading to bolt failure and consequent failure
of the wing.
    Viking has not been able to confirm the affected batch numbers
or specific manufacture date range. New wing strut bolts
manufactured after 21 March 2016 are inspected for pitting during
manufacturing and issued new P/Ns C3W114-5, C3W129-5 and C3W128-5
under MOD 3/1010.

    You may examine the MCAI on the internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2018-
0189.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    Viking Air Limited has issued DHC-3 Otter Service Bulletin Number
V3/0006, Revision B, dated March 9, 2017. The service information
describes procedures for inspection and any necessary corrective action
for pitting of the wing strut shank bolts. This service information is
reasonably available because the interested parties have access to it
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section of this NPRM.

FAA's Determination and Requirements of the Proposed AD

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with this State of

Design Authority, they have notified us of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI and service information referenced above. We are
proposing this AD because we evaluated all information and determined
the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this proposed AD will affect 37 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take about 4 work-hours per
product to comply with the basic requirements of this proposed AD. The
average labor rate is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on
U.S. operators to be $12,580, or $340 per product.
    In addition, Table 1 is an estimate of possible necessary follow-on
actions as a result of the required inspections. We have no way of
determining the number of products that may need these actions. We
estimate that any necessary follow-on replacement parts would cost as
follows:
    Replacing each affected bolt is on condition and is estimated to
take about 1 work-hour at $85 for a cost of $85 per bolt.

                                 Table 1--Parts Replacement and Total Bolt Cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Total cost per
                    Part No.                       Quantity  per   Quantity  per  Price per bolt    bolt (labor
                                                       wing          airplane         ($ USD)       and parts)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
C3W114-5........................................               2               4            $284            $369
C3W128-5........................................               1               2             275             360
C3W129-5........................................               1               2             164             249
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
    This AD is issued in accordance with authority delegated by the
Executive Director, Aircraft Certification Service, as authorized by
FAA Order 8000.51C. In accordance with that order, issuance of ADs is
normally a function of the Compliance and Airworthiness Division, but
during this transition period, the Executive Director has delegated the
authority to issue ADs applicable to small airplanes and domestic
business jet transport airplanes to the Director of the Policy and
Innovation Division.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new AD:

Viking Air Limited: Docket No. FAA-2018-0189; Product Identifier
2017-CE-022-AD.

(a) Comments Due Date

    We must receive comments by April 27, 2018.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Viking Air Limited Model DHC-3 airplanes with
wing strut bolts wing strut bolts part numbers (P/N) C3W114-3,
C3W129-3 and C3W128-3 (Pre MOD 3/1010), all serial numbers,
certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as pitting
corrosion on the shank of the wing strut attach bolts. We are
issuing this proposed AD to detect and correct pitting and un-plated
voids, which could cause a surface condition that may have a
detrimental effect on fatigue and corrosion resistance, leading to
bolt failure and subsequent failure of the wing.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions:
    (1) Within the next 12 months after the effective date of this
AD, inspect the wing strut attach bolts installed on the airplane
for pitting on the shank following paragraph A of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Viking DHC-3 Otter Service Bulletin (SB) Number: V3/
0006, Revision B, dated March 9, 2017.
    (2) If pitting is found after the inspection required in
paragraph (f)(1) of this AD, before further flight, replace the bolt
with either a post MOD 3/1010 wing strut bolt (Part Numbers (P/Ns)
C3W114-5, C3W129-5 or C3W128-5 as applicable) or a new or

serviceable pre MOD 3/1010 wing strut bolt that has been inspected
following paragraph A of Viking DHC-3 Otter SB Number: V3/0006,
Revision B, dated March 9, 2017.
    (3) After the effective date of this AD, pre MOD 3/1010 bolts
may continue to be used provided these bolts are inspected for
pitting immediately before installation following paragraph A of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Viking DHC-3 Otter SB Number: V3/
0006, Revision B, dated March 9, 2017, and the accomplishment of the
inspection must be documented in the airplane maintenance records.

(g) Credit for Actions Accomplished in Accordance With Previous Service
Information

    This AD allows credit for the actions required in paragraph
(f)(1) or (2) of this AD if done before the effective date of this
AD following SB Viking DHC-3 Otter V3/0006 Revision NC or A.

(h) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, New York
11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada; or Viking Air Limited's Transport
Canada Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.

(i) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI Transport Canada AD Number CF-2017-11, dated March
9, 2017, for related information. You may examine the MCAI on the
internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2018-0189. For service information related to this
AD, contact Viking Air Limited Technical Support, 1959 De Havilland
Way, Sidney, British Columbia, Canada, V8L 5V5; telephone: (North
America)<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected]; internet: http://www.vikingair.com/support/service-bulletins. You may review this referenced service
information at the FAA, Policy and Innovation Division, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 6, 2018.
Pat Mullen,
Acting Deputy Director, Policy & Innovation Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-05012 Filed 3-12-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Appendix A  -  Data Collection Instrument

                          ICR Control Number: 2616.02
                           EPA ICR Number: 2040-NEW
                      Expiration Date: December 31, 2023

Burden Statement: There were 2,181 medium community water systems, 708 large systems and 35 NFPNCWs serving 10,000 or more people in the 2021 DWINSA sample. Across these system categories there is no substantive difference in the process or data collection instrument being used for the one-time LSL update and it is assumed that burden will be the same across these categories. EPA will conduct data collection for the 606 small CWSs serving 3,300 and fewer persons and 99 NFPNCWs serving fewer than 10,000 persons. It is assumed that since these systems generally have fewer lines that the burden will be slightly less than for medium and large systems. EPA will email the surveys to the small systems.

       The following pages present the state data collection instrument.


From:
Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent:
Friday, April 1, 2016 4:06 PM
To:
David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc:
Allen Dittenhoefer<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Bill Osborn<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Bryan Kresak<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Charles Jones<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Chris Hardin<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Coleen Davis<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Dan Belack<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Dave Hacker<EMAIL_ADDRESS>David Fanning<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Ed Dinsmore<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>James Hosfield<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Janis Deitch<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jay Cornelius<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Joe Hanning<EMAIL_ADDRESS>John Hill<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jonelle Scheetz<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Julianne Kurdila<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Katie Kistler<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Keith Nagel<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Krista Armentrout<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Marian Gammon<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Mark Poling<EMAIL_ADDRESS>May, Jeffrey X<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Mike Dzurinko<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Nicole Siviy<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Parker Adams<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Patrick Smith<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Randy Wiler<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Rich Zavoda<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Scott Kiechle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Solomon Nyathi<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Taylor Mackey<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Tishie Woodwell<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Traci Self<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Victoria Morton<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Raymond, Gabrielle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject:
RE: Parent Company representatives and mailing addresses - CORRECTION to switch Erie for EES for Enclosure 2 testing - sorry!

Thanks to EES for pointing this out. Glad you stayed calm. J Have a good weekend everyone.

_____________________________________________________________
Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D 243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

<< Coke ICR 114-04-01-16R.docx >>
<< Coke ICR 114-04-01-16R.pdf >>

From: Jones, DonnaLee
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 2:07 PM
To: 'David Ailor'<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Allen Dittenhoefer<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Bill Osborn<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Bryan Kresak<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Charles Jones<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Chris Hardin<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Coleen Davis<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Dan Belack<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Dave Hacker<EMAIL_ADDRESS>David Fanning<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Ed Dinsmore<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>James Hosfield<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Janis Deitch<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jay Cornelius<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Joe Hanning<EMAIL_ADDRESS>John Hill<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jonelle Scheetz<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Julianne Kurdila<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Katie Kistler<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Keith Nagel<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Krista Armentrout<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Marian Gammon<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Mark Poling<EMAIL_ADDRESS>May, Jeffrey X<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Mike Dzurinko<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Nicole Siviy<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Parker Adams<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Patrick Smith<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Randy Wiler<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Rich Zavoda<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Scott Kiechle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Solomon Nyathi<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Taylor Mackey<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Tishie Woodwell<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Traci Self<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Victoria Morton<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>GABRIELLE RAYMOND<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Donnalee Jones<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: Parent Company representatives and mailing addresses

 Thanks for update. I will set up an email group for the future communications. I also will be developing a calendar schedule that translates the "weeks from signature date" into actual dates. I am using Monday 4/4/16 as the "date" since that's when the packages will be mailed out. Due dates can be on or around the date; try to make it close, within a couple days. Early is always OK. J
 We are posting all enclosures and datafiles today on the website. https://icr2010.rti.org/. So only item new in the mail will be the cover letters. I will send a pdf of the signed letters by email Monday to individual companies using provided today.

Here is a table showing (only) the ICR facilities and requirements for Enclosures 1 and 2, as David requested.
_____________________________________________________________
Regards,
Donna Lee Jones, Ph.D.
Senior Technical Advisor, Metals Sector
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards
Sector Policies and Programs Division / Metals & Inorganic Chemicals Group (D 243-02)
Research Triangle Park, NC  27711  Tele:<PHONE_NUMBER>  Fax<PHONE_NUMBER>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Reasonableness never fails to be appreciated."  - anon.

From: David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 1:25 PM
To: Jones, DonnaLee<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Cc: Allen Dittenhoefer<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Bill Osborn<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Bryan Kresak<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Charles Jones<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Chris Hardin<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Coleen Davis<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Dan Belack<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Dave Hacker<EMAIL_ADDRESS>David Ailor<EMAIL_ADDRESS>David Fanning<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Ed Dinsmore<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>James Hosfield<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Janis Deitch<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jay Cornelius<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Joe Hanning<EMAIL_ADDRESS>John Hill<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Jonelle Scheetz<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Julianne Kurdila<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Katie Kistler<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Keith Nagel<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Krista Armentrout<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Marian Gammon<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Mark Poling<EMAIL_ADDRESS>May, Jeffrey X<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Mike Dzurinko<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Nicole Siviy<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Parker Adams<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Patrick Smith<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Randy Wiler<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Rich Zavoda<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Scott Kiechle<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Solomon Nyathi<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Taylor Mackey<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Tishie Woodwell<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Traci Self<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Victoria Morton<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS>Subject: RE: Parent Company representatives and mailing addresses

Donna Lee:

Attached is what I believe is a complete and accurate ownership list.  I'm cc'ing the COETF on this transmittal, in case I've made an error.

For the sake of completeness on the ICR, can you send me and the COETF the current lists of facilities that have to complete the Enclosure 1 Questionnaire and that have to test per Enclosure 2?

Thanks, DCA

David C. Ailor, P.E.
President
American Coke and Coal Chemicals Institute
25 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.
Suite 800
Washington, D.C. 20001
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>
eFax.:<PHONE_NUMBER>
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>www.accci.org