[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 164 (Wednesday, August 24, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 57902]
[FR Doc No: 2016-20281]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. OR16-22-000]

EnLink Crude Pipeline, LLC; Notice of Petition for Declaratory
Order

    Take notice that on August 16, 2016, pursuant to Rule 207(a)(2) of
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.207(a)(2) (2015), EnLink Crude
Pipeline, LLC (``EnLink''), filed a petition for a declaratory order
approving the overall tariff and rate structure for EnLink's new
pipeline system in the Midland Basin in Texas that will gather and
transport crude oil from origin points located in Upton County, Texas
and Midland County, Texas to the SunVit Midland Terminal and the
Enterprise Midland Terminal, both in Midland County, Texas, all as more
fully explained in the petition.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Petitioner.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern time on September 16, 2016.

    Dated: August 18, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-20281 Filed 8-23-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 66 (Wednesday, April 6, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 19923]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07194]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9108-01-OMS]

Cross-Media Electronic Reporting: Authorized Program Revision
Approval, District of Columbia Department of Energy and Environment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the Environmental Protection Agency's
(EPA) approval of the District of Columbia Department of Energy and
Environment (DOEE) request to revise/modify certain of its EPA-
authorized programs to allow electronic reporting.

DATES: EPA approves the authorized program revisions/modifications as
of April 6, 2022.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Shirley M. Miller, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Office of Information Management, Mail Stop 3204A,
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20460,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On October 13, 2005, the final Cross-Media
Electronic Reporting Rule (CROMERR) was published in the Federal
Register (70 FR 59848) and codified as part 3 of title 40 of the CFR.
CROMERR establishes electronic reporting as an acceptable regulatory
alternative to paper reporting and establishes requirements to assure
that electronic documents are as legally dependable as their paper
counterparts. Subpart D of CROMERR requires that state, tribal or local
government agencies that receive, or wish to begin receiving,
electronic reports under their EPA-authorized programs must apply to
EPA for a revision or modification of those programs and obtain EPA
approval. Subpart D provides standards for such approvals based on
consideration of the electronic document receiving systems that the
state, tribe, or local government will use to implement the electronic
reporting. Additionally, Sec.  3.1000(b) through (e) of 40 CFR part 3,
subpart D provides special procedures for program revisions and
modifications to allow electronic reporting, to be used at the option
of the state, tribe or local government in place of procedures
available under existing program-specific authorization regulations. An
application submitted under the subpart D procedures must show that the
state, tribe or local government has sufficient legal authority to
implement the electronic reporting components of the programs covered
by the application and will use electronic document receiving systems
that meet the applicable subpart D requirements.
    On March 21, 2022, the District of Columbia Department of Energy
and Environment (DOEE) submitted an application titled District of
Columbia Department of Energy and Environment Combined Air Emission
Reporting System (CAERS) for revisions/modifications to its EPA-
approved programs under title 40 CFR to allow new electronic reporting.
EPA reviewed DOEE's request to revise/modify its EPA-authorized
programs and, based on this review, EPA determined that the application
met the standards for approval of authorized program revisions/
modifications set out in 40 CFR part 3, subpart D. In accordance with
40 CFR 3.1000(d), this notice of EPA's decision to approve DOEE's
request to revise/modify its following EPA-authorized programs to allow
electronic reporting under 40 CFR is being published in the Federal
Register:

Part 52: Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans (SIP/Clean
Air Act Title II) Reporting under CFR 50-52

    DOEE was notified of EPA's determination to approve its application
with respect to the authorized programs listed above.

    Dated: March 31, 2022.
Jennifer Campbell,
Director, Office of Information Management.
[FR Doc. 2022-07194 Filed 4-5-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 82 (Wednesday, April 29, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 23852-23854]
[FR Doc No: 2015-09896]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2015-0098 (Notice No. 15-8)]

Hazardous Materials: Information Collection Activities

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, PHMSA
invites comments on certain information collections pertaining to
hazardous materials transportation for which PHMSA intends to request
renewal and extension from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
June 29, 2015.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by the docket number
(PHMSA-2015-0098) by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
     Mail: Docket Operations, U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Routing
Symbol M-30, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: To Docket Operations, Room W12-140 on the
ground floor of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulation Identification Number (RIN) for this
notice. Internet users may access comments received by DOT at: http://www.regulations.gov. Note that comments received will be posted without
change to: http://www.regulations.gov including any personal
information provided.
    Privacy Act: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT
posts these comments, without edit, including any personal information
the commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the
system of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.
    Requests for a copy of an information collection should be directed
to Steven Andrews or T. Glenn Foster, Standards and Rulemaking Division
(PHH-12), Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., East Building, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20590-
0001, Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Andrews or T. Glenn Foster,
Standards and Rulemaking Division (PHH-12), Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., East
Building, 2nd Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001, Telephone (202) 366-
8553.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1320.8 (d), Title 5, Code of Federal
Regulations requires PHMSA to provide interested members of the public
and affected agencies an opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping requests. This notice identifies
information collection requests that PHMSA will be submitting to OMB
for renewal and extension. These information collections are contained
in 49 CFR parts 172, 173, 174, 175, 176, and 177 of the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR parts 171-180). PHMSA has revised

burden estimates, where appropriate, to reflect current reporting
levels or adjustments based on changes in proposed or final rules
published since the information collections were last approved. The
following information is provided for each information collection: (1)
Title of the information collection, including former title if a change
is being made; (2) OMB control number; (3) summary of the information
collection activity; (4) description of affected public; (5) estimate
of total annual reporting and recordkeeping burden; and (6) frequency
of collection. PHMSA will request a three-year term of approval for
each information collection activity and, when approved by OMB, publish
a notice of the approval in the Federal Register. PHMSA requests
comments on the following information collections:
    Title: Hazardous Materials Shipping Papers and Emergency Response
Information.
    OMB Control Number: 2137-0034.
    Summary: This information collection is for the requirement to
provide a shipping paper and emergency response information with
shipments of hazardous materials. Shipping papers are considered to be
a basic communication tool relative to the transportation of hazardous
materials. The definition of a shipping paper in 49 CFR 171.8 includes
a shipping order, bill of lading, manifest, or other shipping document
serving a similar purpose and containing the information required by
Sec. Sec.  172.202, 172.203, and 172.204 of the HMR. A shipping paper
with emergency response information must accompany most hazardous
materials shipments and be readily available at all times during
transportation. Shipping papers serve as the principal source of
information regarding the presence of hazardous materials,
identification, quantity, and emergency response procedures. They also
serve as the source of information for compliance with other
requirements, such as the placement of rail cars containing different
hazardous materials in trains; prevent the loading of poisons with
foodstuffs; maintain the separation of incompatible hazardous
materials; and limit the amount of radioactive materials that may be
transported in a vehicle or aircraft. Shipping papers and emergency
response information serve as a means of notifying transport workers
that hazardous materials are present. Most importantly, shipping papers
serve as a principal means of identifying hazardous materials during
transportation emergencies. Firefighters, police, and other emergency
response personnel are trained to obtain the Department of
Transportation (DOT) shipping papers and emergency response information
when responding to hazardous materials transportation emergencies. The
availability of accurate information concerning hazardous materials
being transported significantly improves response efforts in these
types of emergencies.
    PHMSA is revising this information collection burden to reflect the
anticipated completion of the collection of information under the
Hazardous Materials Automated Cargo Communications for Efficient and
Safe Shipments (HM-ACCESS) pilot program.
    Affected Public: Shippers and carriers of hazardous materials in
commerce.
    Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
    Number of Respondents: 260,000.
    Total Annual Responses: 185,000,000.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 4,625,846.
    Frequency of Collection: On occasion.

    Title: Radioactive (RAM) Transportation Requirements.
    OMB Control Number: 2137-0510.
    Summary: This information collection consolidates and describes the
information collection provisions in the HMR involving the
transportation of radioactive materials in commerce. Information
collection requirements for RAM include: Shipper notification to
consignees of the dates of shipment of RAM; expected arrival; special
loading/unloading instructions; verification that shippers using
foreign-made packages hold a foreign competent authority certificate
and verification that the terms of the certificate are being followed
for RAM shipments being made into this country; and specific handling
instructions from shippers to carriers for fissile RAM, bulk shipments
of low specific activity RAM, and packages of RAM which emit high
levels of external radiation. These information collection requirements
help to establish that proper packages are used for the type of
radioactive material being transported; external radiation levels do
not exceed prescribed limits; and packages are handled appropriately
and delivered in a timely manner, so as to ensure the safety of the
general public, transport workers, and emergency responders.
    Affected Public: Shippers and carriers of radioactive materials in
commerce.
    Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
    Number of Respondents: 3,817.
    Total Annual Responses: 21,519.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 15,270.
    Frequency of Collection: On occasion.

    Title: Subsidiary Hazard Class and Number/Type of Packagings.
    OMB Control Number: 2137-0613.
    Summary: The HMR require that shipping papers and emergency
response information accompany each shipment of hazardous materials in
commerce. In addition to the basic shipping description information, we
also require the subsidiary hazard class or subsidiary division
number(s) to be entered in parentheses following the primary hazard
class or division number on shipping papers. This requirement was
originally required only by transportation by vessel. However, the lack
of such a requirement posed problems for motor carriers with regard to
complying with segregation, separation, and placarding requirements, as
well as posing a safety hazard. For example, in the event the motor
vehicle becomes involved in an accident, when the hazardous materials
being transported include a subsidiary hazard such as ``dangerous when
wet'' or a subsidiary hazard requiring more stringent requirements than
the primary hazard, there is no indication of the subsidiary hazards on
the shipping papers and no indication of the subsidiary risks on
placards. Under circumstances such as motor vehicles being loaded at a
dock, labels are not enough to alert hazardous materials employees
loading the vehicles, nor are they enough to alert emergency responders
of the subsidiary risks contained on the vehicles. Therefore, we
require the subsidiary hazard class or subsidiary division number(s) to
be entered on the shipping paper, for purposes of enhancing safety and
international harmonization.
    We also require the number and type of packagings to be indicated
on the shipping paper. This requirement makes it mandatory for shippers
to indicate on shipping papers the numbers and types of packages, such
as drums, boxes, jerricans, etc., being used to transport hazardous
materials by all modes of transportation.
    Shipping papers serve as a principal means of identifying hazardous
materials during transportation emergencies. Firefighters, police, and
other emergency response personnel are trained to obtain the DOT
shipping papers and emergency response information when responding to
hazardous materials transportation emergencies. The availability of
accurate information concerning hazardous materials being transported
significantly improves response efforts in these types of emergencies.
The additional information would aid

emergency responders by more clearly identifying the hazard.
    Affected Public: Shippers and carriers of hazardous materials in
commerce.
    Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
    Number of Respondents: 250,000.
    Total Annual Responses: 6,337,500.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 17,604.
    Frequency of Collection: On occasion.

William S. Schoonover,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015-09896 Filed 4-28-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 35 (Tuesday, February 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9075-9078]
[FR Doc No: 2016-03659]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket Nos. PHMSA-2016-0004 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C.
(TGP); PHMSA-2016-0006 Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (SNG);
PHMSA-2016-0007 El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. (EPNG); PHMSA-2016-
0008 Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C. (CIG); PHMSA-2016-0009
NEXUS Gas Transmission, L.L.C. (NEXUS)]

Pipeline Safety: Request for Special Permit

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA);
DOT.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Federal pipeline safety laws, PHMSA is
publishing this notice of special permit requests we have received from
several natural gas pipeline operators, seeking relief from compliance
with certain requirements in the Federal pipeline safety regulations.
This notice seeks public comments on these requests, including comments
on any safety or environmental impacts. At the conclusion of the 30-day
comment period, PHMSA will evaluate the requests and determine whether
to grant or deny a special permit.

DATES: Submit any comments regarding these special permit requests by
March 24, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Comments should reference the docket numbers for the
specific special permit request and may be submitted in the following
ways:
     E-Gov Web site: http://www.Regulations.gov. This site
allows the public to enter comments on any Federal Register notice
issued by any agency.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
     Mail: Docket Management System: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: DOT Docket Management System: U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590 between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
    Instructions: You should identify the docket number for the special
permit request you are commenting on at the beginning of your comments.
If you submit your comments by mail, please submit two copies. To
receive confirmation that PHMSA has received your comments, please
include a self-addressed stamped postcard. Internet users may submit
comments at http://www.Regulations.gov.

    Note: Comments are posted without changes or edits to http://www.Regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
There is a privacy statement published on http://www.Regulations.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
    General: Kay McIver by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>; or, email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Technical: Steve Nanney by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER>; or, email
at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PHMSA has received requests for special
permits from pipeline operators who seek relief from compliance with
certain pipeline safety regulations. Each request includes a technical
analysis and a Draft Environment Assessment (EA) provided by the
respective operator. Each request is filed in the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) and has been assigned a separate docket number
in the FDMS. We invite interested persons to participate by reviewing
these special permit requests, their supporting EA, and any proposed
special permit conditions to maintain pipeline integrity and safety, at
http://www.Regulations.gov; and by submitting written comments, data or
other views. Please include any comments on potential safety or
environmental impacts that may result if these special permits are
granted.
    Before acting on these special permit requests, PHMSA will evaluate
all comments received on or before the comments closing date. Comments
will be evaluated after this date if it is possible to do so without
incurring additional expense or delay. PHMSA will consider each
relevant comment we receive in making our decision to grant or deny the
request.
    PHMSA has received the following special permit request(s):

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Docket No.                     Requester             Regulation(s)        Nature of special permit
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PHMSA-2016-0004....................  Tennessee Gas Pipeline  49 CFR 192.611(a) and   To authorize TGP Company
                                      Company, L.L.C. (TGP).  (d), 192.619(a) and     relief from certain
                                                              192.5.                  Federal regulations found
                                                                                in 49 CFR 192.611(a) and
                                                                                (d), 192.619(a) and 192.5,
                                                                                for pipeline segments
                                                                                where the class location
                                                                                of the segments had been
                                                                                changed in accordance with
                                                                                Sec.   192.5(c) ``cluster
                                                                                rule''.
                                                                                TGP found that their
                                                                                procedure methodology for
                                                                                the determination of class
                                                                                location boundaries using
                                                                                the clustering and sliding
                                                                                mile criteria in 49 CFR
                                                                                192.5(c) was incorrect and
                                                                                has updated operating
                                                                                procedures for usage of
                                                                                this cluster rule, and the
                                                                                sliding mile for
                                                                                confirmation of maximum
                                                                                allowable operating
                                                                                pressure (MAOP). The
                                                                                change in clustering
                                                                                methodology resulted in a
                                                                                number of new class
                                                                                location units, and more
                                                                                specifically Class 3
                                                                                locations, for which
                                                                                pressure testing or pipe
                                                                                replacements are now
                                                                                required.
                                                                                TGP proposes to replace all
                                                                                pipeline segments that are
                                                                                in areas with over 10
                                                                                dwellings for human
                                                                                occupancy within 5 years,
                                                                                and to implement enhanced
                                                                                integrity management (IM)
                                                                                activities over all
                                                                                described pipeline
                                                                                segments. These proposed
                                                                                IM activities can be
                                                                                reviewed on docket # PHMSA-
                                                                                2016-0004 at http://www.Regulations.gov.
                                                                                This change impacts 48.02
                                                                                miles of TGP mainline
                                                                                pipelines. The special
                                                                                permit request covers
                                                                                multiple TGP interstate
                                                                                pipeline segments located
                                                                                in the states of Kentucky,
                                                                                Louisiana, Mississippi,
                                                                                New Jersey, New York,
                                                                                Ohio, Pennsylvania,
                                                                                Tennessee, Texas and West
                                                                                Virginia.
PHMSA-2016-0006....................  Southern Natural Gas,   49 CFR 192.611(a) and   To authorize SNG Company
                                      Company, L.L.C. (SNG).  (d), 192.619(a) and     relief from certain
                                                              192.5.                  Federal regulations found
                                                                                in 49 CFR 192.611(a) and
                                                                                (d), 192.619(a) and 192.5,
                                                                                for pipeline segments
                                                                                where the class location
                                                                                of the segments had been
                                                                                changed in accordance with
                                                                                Sec.   192.5(c) ``cluster
                                                                                rule''.
                                                                                SNG found that their
                                                                                procedure methodology for
                                                                                the determination of class
                                                                                location boundaries using
                                                                                the clustering and sliding
                                                                                mile criteria in 49 CFR
                                                                                192.5(c) was incorrect and
                                                                                has updated operating
                                                                                procedures for usage of
                                                                                this cluster rule, and the
                                                                                sliding mile for
                                                                                confirmation of maximum
                                                                                allowable operating
                                                                                pressure (MAOP). The
                                                                                change in clustering
                                                                                methodology resulted in a
                                                                                number of new class
                                                                                location units, and more
                                                                                specifically Class 3
                                                                                locations, for which
                                                                                pressure testing or pipe
                                                                                replacements are now
                                                                                required.
                                                                                SNG proposes to replace all
                                                                                pipeline segments that are
                                                                                in areas with over 10
                                                                                dwellings for human
                                                                                occupancy within 5 years,
                                                                                and to implement enhanced
                                                                                integrity management (IM)
                                                                                activities over all
                                                                                described pipeline
                                                                                segments. These proposed
                                                                                IM activities can be
                                                                                reviewed on docket # PHMSA-
                                                                                2016-0006 at http://www.Regulations.gov.
                                                                                This change impacts 5.75
                                                                                miles of SNG mainline
                                                                                pipelines. The special
                                                                                permit request covers
                                                                                multiple SNG interstate
                                                                                pipeline segments located
                                                                                in the states of Alabama,
                                                                                Georgia, Louisiana and
                                                                                Mississippi.
PHMSA-2016-0007....................  El Paso Natural Gas     49 CFR 192.611(a) and   To authorize EPNG Company
                                      Company, L.L.C.         (d), 192.619(a) and     relief from certain
                                      (EPNG).                 192.5.                  Federal regulations found
                                                                                in 49 CFR 192.611(a) and
                                                                                (d), 192.619(a) and 192.5,
                                                                                for pipeline segments
                                                                                where the class location
                                                                                of the segments had been
                                                                                changed in accordance with
                                                                                Sec.   192.5(c) ``cluster
                                                                                rule''.

                                                                                EPNG found that their
                                                                                procedure methodology for
                                                                                the determination of class
                                                                                location boundaries using
                                                                                the clustering and sliding
                                                                                mile criteria in 49 CFR
                                                                                192.5(c) was incorrect and
                                                                                has updated operating
                                                                                procedures for usage of
                                                                                this cluster rule, and the
                                                                                sliding mile for
                                                                                confirmation of maximum
                                                                                allowable operating
                                                                                pressure (MAOP). The
                                                                                change in clustering
                                                                                methodology resulted in a
                                                                                number of new class
                                                                                location units, and more
                                                                                specifically Class 3
                                                                                locations, for which
                                                                                pressure testing or pipe
                                                                                replacements are now
                                                                                required.
                                                                                EPNG proposes to replace
                                                                                all pipeline segments that
                                                                                are in areas with over 10
                                                                                dwellings for human
                                                                                occupancy within 5 years,
                                                                                and to implement enhanced
                                                                                integrity management (IM)
                                                                                activities over all
                                                                                described pipeline
                                                                                segments. These proposed
                                                                                IM activities can be
                                                                                reviewed on docket # PHMSA-
                                                                                2016-0007 at http://www.Regulations.gov.
                                                                                This change impacts 7.25
                                                                                miles of EPNG mainline
                                                                                pipelines. The special
                                                                                permit request covers
                                                                                multiple EPNG interstate
                                                                                pipeline segments located
                                                                                in the states of Arizona,
                                                                                New Mexico, and Texas.
PHMSA-2016-0008....................  Colorado Interstate     49 CFR 192.611(a) and   To authorize CIG Company
                                      Gas Company, L.L.C.     (d), 192.619(a) and     relief from certain
                                      (CIG).                  192.5.                  Federal regulations found
                                                                                in 49 CFR 192.611(a) and
                                                                                (d), 192.619(a) and 192.5,
                                                                                for pipeline segments
                                                                                where the class location
                                                                                of the segments had been
                                                                                changed in accordance with
                                                                                Sec.   192.5(c) ``cluster
                                                                                rule''.
                                                                                CIG found that their
                                                                                procedure methodology for
                                                                                the determination of class
                                                                                location boundaries using
                                                                                the clustering and sliding
                                                                                mile criteria in 49 CFR
                                                                                192.5(c) was incorrect and
                                                                                has updated operating
                                                                                procedures for usage of
                                                                                this cluster rule, and the
                                                                                sliding mile for
                                                                                confirmation of maximum
                                                                                allowable operating
                                                                                pressure (MAOP). The
                                                                                change in clustering
                                                                                methodology resulted in a
                                                                                number of new class
                                                                                location units, and more
                                                                                specifically Class 3
                                                                                locations, for which
                                                                                pressure testing or pipe
                                                                                replacements are now
                                                                                required.
                                                                                CIG proposes to replace all
                                                                                pipeline segments that are
                                                                                in areas with over 10
                                                                                dwellings for human
                                                                                occupancy within 5 years,
                                                                                and to implement enhanced
                                                                                integrity management (IM)
                                                                                activities over all
                                                                                described pipeline
                                                                                segments. These proposed
                                                                                IM activities can be
                                                                                reviewed on docket # PHMSA-
                                                                                2016-0008 at http://www.Regulations.gov.
                                                                                This change impacts 3.47
                                                                                miles of CIG mainline
                                                                                pipelines. The special
                                                                                permit request covers
                                                                                multiple CIG interstate
                                                                                pipeline segments located
                                                                                in the states of Colorado
                                                                                and Wyoming.
PHMSA-2016-0009....................  NEXUS Gas               49 CFR 192.625........  To authorize NEXUS Gas
                                      Transmission, L.L.C.                            Transmission, L.L.C., in
                                      (NEXUS).                                        the waiving of certain
                                                                                Federal odorization
                                                                                requirements found in 49
                                                                                CFR 192.625, for its
                                                                                proposed pipeline system
                                                                                in Michigan.
                                                                                The proposed NEXUS system
                                                                                will consist of
                                                                                approximately 255 miles of
                                                                                new 36-inch pipeline, four
                                                                                (4) new compressor
                                                                                stations, and six (6) new
                                                                                meter stations with a
                                                                                design capacity of 1.5
                                                                                billion cubic feet per day
                                                                                (Bcf/d). The construction
                                                                                and operation of the NEXUS
                                                                                Pipeline will be done by
                                                                                Spectra Energy Partners,
                                                                                L.P. (SEP), in partnership
                                                                                with DTE Energy Company.
                                                                                The NEXUS pipeline route
                                                                                primarily passes through
                                                                                Class 1 areas for the
                                                                                first 248 miles. However,
                                                                                approximately 55% (~4.0)
                                                                                miles of the last 7.3
                                                                                miles leading up to the
                                                                                terminus of the NEXUS
                                                                                pipeline and the
                                                                                interconnect with DTE Gas
                                                                                Company, will pass through
                                                                                Class 3 areas. As a result
                                                                                of the Class 3 percentage,
                                                                                49 CFR 192.625 requires
                                                                                odorization of the
                                                                                pipeline in the Class 3
                                                                                areas of the last 7.3
                                                                                miles of the NEXUS
                                                                                pipeline.

                                                                                NEXUS proposed to implement
                                                                                additional design,
                                                                                materials, construction,
                                                                                operations and maintenance
                                                                                requirements described in
                                                                                Sections 4.2 through 4.5,
                                                                                below, that would be
                                                                                specified conditions in
                                                                                their proposed special
                                                                                permit. These proposed
                                                                                conditions can be reviewed
                                                                                on docket # PHMSA-2016-
                                                                                0009 at http://www.Regulations.gov.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 60118 (c)(1) and 49 CFR 1.97

Alan K. Mayberry,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Policy and Programs.
[FR Doc. 2016-03659 Filed 2-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


Integration Workgroup Recommendations EPA/ ECOS Public Meeting Chicago, IL October 19, 2005 Integration Workgroup Overview Investigate ways to obtain support from State and EPA Program and Regional offices to ensure performance based environmental programs are recognized among the Agencies' planning priorities. Subgroups Formed for Each Program Office Five subgroups ( air, water, waste, pollution prevention, and enforcement) were charged with identifying opportunities to:

° Integrate performance based programs into planning and budgeting considerations for each program office and ° Provide " credit" for the work performed and achievements attained through performance based programs and the efforts of their members Integration Principle 1. Performance based programs are now recognized as high priority, successful ways of achieving environmental protection; they must be reflected in federal and state planning, budgeting, and accountability systems. Integration Principle 2. Federal and state environmental agencies must educate their organizations so they understand how to integrate performancebased programs into traditional methods of achieving environmental protection. Specific Recommendations 1. Credit states for using performance based programs to achieve EPA program area commitments via flexible use of federal grants 2. Identify in EPA data systems where a facility is a member of a state performancebased program Specific Recommendations   Cont.

3. Credit states for compliance outputs and/ or outcomes achieved via performance based programs 4. Credit states for percentage reductions below permitted levels achieved by performance based program members 5. Credit states for addressing national, regional,

and/ or state specific environmental priorities via performance based programs To Submit Comments 1. Go to: www. epa. gov/ edocket 2. Select: " View EPA HQ Material for Comment"

3. Select Docket No. 2005  003


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 11, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 21546-21547]
[FR Doc No: 2023-07544]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

Docket No. FAA-2023-0534; Airspace Docket No. 21-AWP-52
RIN 2120-AA66

Amendment of V-388 Near Paradise, CA

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the Very High Frequency (VHF)
Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal airway V-388 between the Paradise,
CA, VOR/Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC) and the Palm Springs, CA,
VORTAC navigational aids. The FAA is proposing this action to extend V-
388 westward to the Seal Beach, CA, VORTAC.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before May 26, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by FAA Docket No. [FAA-2023-0534]
and Airspace Docket No. 21-AWP-52 using any of the following methods:
    * Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.
    * Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
    * Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
    * Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to the Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of
the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. You may also contact the Rules and
Regulations Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steven Roff, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would modify the airway structure as necessary to
preserve the safe and efficient flow of air traffic within the National
Airspace System.

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites interested persons to participate in this
rulemaking by submitting written comments, data, or views. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal. The most
helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain
the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. To
ensure the docket does not contain duplicate comments, commenters
should submit only one time if comments are filed electronically, or
commenters should send only one copy of written comments if comments
are filed in writing.
    The FAA will file in the docket all comments it receives, as well
as a report summarizing each substantive public contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed rulemaking. Before acting on this
proposal, the FAA will consider all comments it receives on or before
the closing date for comments. The FAA will consider comments filed
after the comment period has closed if it is possible to do so without
incurring expense or delay. The FAA may change this proposal in light
of the comments it receives.
    Privacy: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits comments
from the public to better inform its rulemaking process. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at
www.dot.gov/privacy.

Availability of Rulemaking Documents

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Operations office (see ADDRESSES section for address, phone number, and
hours of operations). An informal docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the office of the Western Service Center,
Federal Aviation Administration, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA
98198.

Incorporation by Reference

    VOR Federal Airways are published in paragraph 6010 of FAA Order JO
7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 on an annual basis. This
document proposes to amend the current version of that order, FAA Order
JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022 and effective September 15, 2022.
These updates would be published in the next update to FAA Order JO
7400.11. That order is publicly available as listed in the ADDRESSES
section of this document.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11G lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting points.

Background

    FAA proposes to extend V-388 westward from the Paradise VORTAC to
the Seal Beach VORTAC following the standard route to enhance safety.
The standard routing used by air traffic control (ATC) and issued to
aircraft flying between the Paradise VORTAC and the Seal Beach VORTAC
is from the Paradise VORTAC northwest along the

Paradise VORTAC 285[deg](T)/270[deg](M) radial to the DOWDD Fix, then
southwest along the Pomona, CA, VORTAC 202[deg](T)/187[deg](M) radial
to the AHEIM Fix, then westward to the Seal Beach VORTAC. The airspace
in which this extension would transition is highly congested and
equally complex. To mitigate potential safety risks while maintaining
the highest level of efficiency as possible, the controlling ATC
facilities have devised specific traffic flows and utilize the standard
routing noted previously. This extension of V-388 would overlap the
routing issued to aircraft today, reduce ATC and pilot computer
entries, simplify ATC clearances, and reduce the workload of pilots and
aviators thus enhancing aviation safety as a whole.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to extend V-388
westward beyond the Paradise, CA, VORTAC to the Seal Beach, CA, VORTAC.
This action would incorporate the standard routing used by ATC into the
VOR Federal airways enroute structure to preserve the safe and
efficient flow of air traffic in southern CA. The proposed extension is
described below.
    V-388: V-388 currently extends between the Paradise, CA, VORTAC and
the Palm Springs, CA, VORTAC. The FAA proposes to extend the airway
westward from the Paradise, CA, VORTAC to the Seal Beach, CA, VORTAC.
The proposed extension would extend from the Paradise VORTAC to the
intersection of the Paradise VORTAC 285[deg](T)/270[deg](M) and Pomona,
CA, VORTAC 202[deg](T)/187[deg](M) radials (DOWDD Fix), then to the
intersection of the Pomona, CA, VORTAC 202[deg](T)/187[deg](M) and Seal
Beach, CA, VORTAC 073[deg](T)/058[deg](M) radials (AHEIM Fix), then to
the Seal Beach, CA, VORTAC. As amended, the airway would extend between
the Seal Beach VORTAC and the Palm Springs VORTAC.
    Existing NAVAID radials in the V-388 description below are
unchanged and stated in degrees True north. New intersection NAVAID
radials are stated in degrees True north (T)/Magnetic north (M).
    VOR Federal airways are published in paragraph 6010(a) of FAA Order
JO 7400.11G, dated August 19, 2022, and effective September 15, 2022,
which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The V-388 airway
action listed in this document would be published subsequently in FAA
Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a regulatory evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this proposed rule, when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1   [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11G, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 19,
2022, and effective September 15, 2022, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6010(a) Domestic VOR Federal Airways.

* * * * *

V-388 [Amended]

    From Seal Beach, CA; INT Seal Beach 073[deg] and Pomona, CA,
202[deg] radials; INT Pomona 202[deg] and Paradise, CA, 285[deg]
radials; Paradise; INT Paradise, CA 087[deg] and Palm Springs, CA,
287[deg] radials; to Palm Springs.
* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 3, 2023.
Brian Konie,
Acting Manager, Airspace Rules and Regulations.
[FR Doc. 2023-07544 Filed 4-10-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 155 (Tuesday, August 11, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 48631]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17479]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

[Docket Number FRA-2020-0064]

Petition for Waiver of Compliance

    Under part 211 of title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), this
document provides the public notice that on July 28, 2020, BNSF Railway
Company (BNSF) petitioned the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) for
a waiver of compliance from certain provisions of the Federal railroad
safety regulations contained at 49 CFR part 213. FRA assigned the
petition Docket Number FRA-2020-0064.
    Specifically, BNSF requests relief from 49 CFR 213.233, which
requires track inspections to be conducted visually by railroad track
inspectors qualified under 49 CFR 213.7 at certain frequencies based on
the class of track. BNSF seeks to replace these visual track inspection
requirements with a combination of performance-based automated and
visual inspections. Proposed automated inspections would be performed
by Unmanned Automated Track Geometry Cars every 12 million gross tons,
not to exceed four weeks between tests. Proposed visual inspections
would be performed either twice per month, weekly, or three times per
week, based on risk model calculations made weekly for each track
segment.
    In support of its petition, BNSF references data and analysis from
BNSF's ongoing Track Inspection Test Program, Docket Number FRA-2018-
0091. BNSF states that the requested relief would positively impact
safety by increasing defect identification and remediation, reduce
employee exposure to potential hazards, and facilitate maintenance
program planning.
    A copy of the petition, as well as any written communications
concerning the petition, if any, are available for review online at
www.regulations.gov.
    Interested parties are invited to participate in these proceedings
by submitting written views, data, or comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing for these proceedings since the facts do
not appear to warrant a hearing. If any interested parties desire an
opportunity for oral comment and a public hearing, they should notify
FRA, in writing, before the end of the comment period and specify the
basis for their request.
    All communications concerning these proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number and may be submitted by any of the following
methods:
     Website: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: Docket Operations Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, W12-140, Washington, DC
20590.
     Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Room W12-140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal Holidays.
    Communications received by September 25, 2020 will be considered by
FRA before final action is taken. Comments received after that date
will be considered if practicable. Anyone can search the electronic
form of any written communications and comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the document, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). Under 5 U.S.C. 553(c), DOT solicits
comments from the public to better inform its processes. DOT posts
these comments, without edit, including any personal information the
commenter provides, to www.regulations.gov, as described in the system
of records notice (DOT/ALL-14 FDMS), which can be reviewed at https://www.transportation.gov/privacy. See also https://www.regulations.gov/privacyNotice for the privacy notice of regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC.
John Karl Alexy,
Associate Administrator for Railroad Safety, Chief Safety Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020-17479 Filed 8-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 74 (Thursday, April 17, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 21636]
[FR Doc No: 2014-08931]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Railroad Administration

49 CFR Part 229

Locomotive Safety Standards

CFR Correction

    In Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 200 to 299,
revised as of October 1, 2013, on page 501, Sec.  229.17 is reinstated
to read as follows:

Sec.  229.17  Accident reports.

    (a) In the case of an accident due to a failure from any cause of a
locomotive or any part or appurtenance of a locomotive, or a person
coming in contact with an electrically energized part or appurtenance,
that results in serious injury or death of one or more persons, the
carrier operating the locomotive shall immediately report the accident
by toll free telephone, Area Code<PHONE_NUMBER>. The report shall state
the nature of the accident, number of persons killed or seriously
injured, the place at which it occurred, the location at which the
locomotive or the affected parts may be inspected by the FRA, and the
name, title and phone number of the person making the call. The
locomotive or the part or parts affected by the accident shall be
preserved intact by the carrier until after the FRA inspection.
    (b) Written confirmation of the oral report required by paragraph
(a) of this section shall be immediately mailed to the Federal Railroad
Administration, RRS-25, Washington, D.C. 20590, and contain a detailed
description of the accident, including to the extent known, the causes
and the number of persons killed and injured. The written report
required by this paragraph is in addition to the reporting requirements
of 49 CFR Part 225.

[FR Doc. 2014-08931 Filed 4-16-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1505-01-D


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 146 (Thursday, July 30, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45533-45534]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18669]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0479; FRL 9931-23-OEI]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Reporting in the FIFRA
Cooperative Agreement Work Plan and Report Template; Submitted to OMB
for Review and Approval; Comment Request

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA has submitted the following information collection request
(ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and
approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA):
``Reporting in the FIFRA Cooperative Agreement Work Plan and Report
Template'' and identified by EPA ICR No. 2511.01 and OMB Control No.
2070-NEW. The ICR, which is available in the docket along with other
related materials, provides a detailed explanation of the collection
activities and the burden estimate that is only briefly summarized in
this document. EPA did not receive any comments in response to the
previously provided public review opportunity issued in the Federal
Register on January 2, 2015 (80 FR 40). A correction notice published
on January 8, 2015 (80 FR 1029).

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 31, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification
(ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2014-0479, to both EPA and OMB as follows:
     To EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method) or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC 20460.
     To OMB via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address
comments to OMB Desk Officer for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
docket without change, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information claimed to
be Confidential Business Information (CBI), or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Cameo G. Smoot, Field and External
Affairs Division, (7605P), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 305-5454; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Docket: Supporting documents, including the ICR that explains in
detail the information collection activities and the related burden and
cost estimates that are summarized in this document, are available in
the docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at http://www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW.,
Washington, DC. The telephone number for the Docket Center is (202)
566-1744. For additional information about EPA's

public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    ICR status: This ICR is for a new information collection activity.
    Under PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., an agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of
information, unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.
The OMB control numbers are displayed either by publication in the
Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such as on the related
collection instrument or form, if applicable. The display of OMB
control numbers for certain EPA regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR
part 9.
    Abstract: This ICR documents the Paperwork burden of the electronic
collection of information for the pre-award burden activity for
creating a work plan and the post-award and after-the-grant award
activities related to reporting accomplishments to implement EPA's
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) State and
Tribal Assistance Grant (STAG) program (7 U.S.C. 136u). This ICR
augments the ICR entitled ``EPA's General Regulation for Assistance
Programs ICR'' (EPA No. 0938.18; OMB No. 2030-0020) which accounts for
the current PRA burden for the minimum management requirements for all
recipients of EPA grants or cooperative agreements (assistance
agreements). This new ICR provides OMB the burden assessment for
collecting the same information in a different standardized electronic
format for only the STAG grant program.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: State, local governments, tribes and
U.S. territories. Entities potentially affected by this ICR are
grantees of Federal funds participating in the FIFRA and STAG program.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (7 U.S.C. 136u and 40
CFR parts 30 and 31).
    Estimated total number of potential respondents: 81.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Estimated total burden: 6,318 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
    Estimated total costs: $233,280 (per year), includes no annualized
capital investment or maintenance and operational costs.
    Changes in the estimates: This is a new ICR. Relative to the
baseline annual burden for reporting general management grant reporting
requirements approved under EPA ICR No. 0938.18; OMB No. 2030-0020, the
overall annual burden increase for FIFRA program specific activities is
6,318 hours, or 78 hours per respondent annually. This change documents
the incremental burden for reporting FIFRA grant program specific
activities (e.g., 5,700 environmental enforcement and endangered
species activities) and provides conservative projection for program
growth. This is a program change.

     Authority:  44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2015-18669 Filed 7-29-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 108 (Tuesday, June 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 37052]
[FR Doc No: 2023-12023]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Docket No. ER23-1973-000]

BE-Pine 1 LLC; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-Based Rate
Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204 Authorization

    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
BE-Pine 1 LLC's application for market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that such application includes a
request for blanket authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future
issuances of securities and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington,
DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Anyone
filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is June 20, 2023.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at https://www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically may mail similar pleadings to
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE,
Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in docketed
proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services, 12225
Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (https://www.ferc.gov)
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this
time, the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at [email protected] or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 31, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-12023 Filed 6-5-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 1, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 61)]
[Notices]
[Page 14796-14797]
[DOCID:fr01ap09-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Notice of FERC Staff Attendance at Southwest Power Pool's
Synergistic Planning Project Team and Cost Allocation Working Group
Meetings

DATES: March 25, 2009.
    The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission hereby gives notice that
members of its staff may attend the meetings of the Southwest Power
Pool (SPP) Synergistic Planning Project Team and the SPP Cost
Allocation Working Group, as noted below. Their attendance is part of
the Commission's ongoing outreach efforts.

SPP Synergistic Planning Project Team Meeting

March 31, 2009 (10 a.m.-3 p.m.), Embassy Suites Outdoor World, 2401

Bass Pro Drive, Grapevine, TX 76051,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SPP Cost Allocation Working Group Meeting

April 1, 2009 (10 a.m.-4 p.m.), Embassy Suites Outdoor World, 2401 Bass
Pro Drive, Grapevine, TX 76051,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    The discussions may address matters at issue in the following
proceedings:

Docket No. ER06-451, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket Nos. ER07-319 and EL07-73, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER07-371, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER07-1255, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER07-1206, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-923, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1307, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1308, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1357, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1358, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1419, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER08-1516, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-35, Tallgrass Transmission LLC
Docket No. ER09-36, Prairie Wind Transmission LLC
Docket No. ER09-262, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-342, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-548, ITC Great Plains LLC
Docket No. ER09-574, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-575, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-639, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-714, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-715, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-748, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-758, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-778, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-659, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. ER09-681, Green Power Express LP
Docket No. OA08-5, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. OA08-60, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. OA08-61, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Docket No. OA08-104, Southwest Power Pool, Inc.

    These meetings are open to the public.
    For more information, contact Patrick Clarey, Office of Energy
Market Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission at (317) 249-
5937 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E9-7238 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]