[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 13 (Thursday, January 20, 2022)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3050-3052]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00884]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0005; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-01062-R]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Airbus Helicopters Model EC130T2 helicopters. This proposed AD
was prompted by the determination of a certain part needing a life
limit and re-identification. This proposed AD would require re-
identifying a certain part-numbered engine-to-main gearbox (engine-MGB)
coupling shaft, and creating a log card or equivalent record, as
specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which
is proposed for incorporation by reference (IBR). The FAA is proposing
this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by March 7,
2022.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building, Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    For EASA material that is proposed for IBR in this AD, contact the
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221
8999 000; email: [email protected]; internet: www.easa.europa.eu. You
may find the EASA material on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. This material is also
available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating
Docket No. FAA-2022-0005.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0005; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this NPRM, the EASA AD,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer,
COS Program Management Section, Operational Safety Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1600 Stewart Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2022-0005; Project Identifier
MCAI-2021-01062-R'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing

date and may amend this proposal because of those comments.
    Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this NPRM.

Confidential Business Information

    CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Andrea Jimenez, Aerospace Engineer, COS Program Management Section,
Operational Safety Branch, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, FAA,
1600 Stewart Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (516) 228-
7330; email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA
receives that is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in
the public docket for this rulemaking.

Background

    EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2021-0216, dated September 23, 2021
(EASA AD 2021-0216), to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus
Helicopters (AH), formerly Eurocopter, Model EC 130 T2 helicopters, all
serial numbers.
    This proposed AD was prompted by the determination from recent
analysis related to service life, for the need to introduce a service
life limit (life limit) in torque cycles for engine-MGB coupling shaft
part number (P/N) 350A35-1100-21. The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition, which if not corrected could lead to
fatigue failure of the affected part, and loss of control of the
helicopter. See EASA AD 2021-0216 for additional background
information.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2021-0216 requires re-identifying each affected engine-MGB
coupling shaft, by crossing out the old P/N and marking the new P/N and
serial number (S/N), and creating a log card indicating the new P/N, S/
N, and the initial value of accumulated torque cycles. EASA AD 2021-
0216 also prohibits installing an affected engine-MGB coupling shaft on
any helicopter.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Other Related Service Information

    The FAA reviewed Airbus Helicopters Alert Service Bulletin No.
EC130-04A010, dated July 15, 2021 (ASB EC130-04A010). This service
information specifies procedures for re-identifying the engine-MGB
coupling shaft by crossing out the old P/N and marking the new P/N and
a new S/N using a vibration scriber. ASB EC130-04A010 also specifies
instructions for creating a log card for the engine-MGB coupling shaft
indicating the new P/N, the new S/N, and the number of torque cycles.
Finally, ASB EC130-04A010 specifies instructions for calculating the
number of torque cycles that are required to be indicated on the log
card.

FAA's Determination

    These helicopters have been approved by EASA and are approved for
operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral
agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA about the
unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is proposing this AD
after evaluating all known relevant information and determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other helicopters of the same type design.

Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM

    This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2021-0216, described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD and except as discussed under
``Differences Between this Proposed AD and EASA AD 2021-0216.''

Explanation of Required Compliance Information

    In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2021-0216 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with
EASA AD 2021-0216 in its entirety through that incorporation, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading
of a particular section in EASA AD 2021-0216 does not mean that
operators need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,''
compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section
titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2021-
0216. Service information referenced in EASA AD 2021-0216 for
compliance will be available at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2022-0005 after the FAA final
rule is published.

Differences Between This Proposed AD and EASA AD 2021-0216

    Service information referenced in EASA AD 2021-0216 specifies
sending certain information to the manufacturer; this proposed AD would
not. Paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2021-0216 specifies a compliance time of
before exceeding 660 flight hours or 24 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first. However, this proposed AD would
require compliance before exceeding 660 hours time-in-service or 24
months after the effective date of this proposed AD, whichever occurs
first.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 264 helicopters of U.S. Registry. Labor rates are estimated at
$85 per work-hour. Based on these numbers, the FAA estimates the
following costs to comply with this proposed AD.
    Re-identifying the engine-MGB coupling shaft would take about 4
work-hours for an estimated cost of $340 per helicopter and up to
$89,760 for the U.S. fleet.
    Creating a log card or equivalent record would take about 1 work-
hour for

an estimated cost of $85 per log card and up to $22,440 for the U.S.
fleet.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA-2022-0005; Project Identifier
MCAI-2021-01062-R.

(a) Comments Due Date

    The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by March 7, 2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus Helicopters Model EC130T2
helicopters, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6300, Main Rotor
Drive System.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by the determination of a certain part
needing a life limit and re-identification. The FAA is issuing this
AD to prevent fatigue failure of the engine-to-main gearbox (engine-
MGB) coupling shaft, which if not corrected, could result in loss of
control of the helicopter.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2021-0216, dated September 23, 2021 (EASA AD 2021-0216).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2021-0216

    (1) Where EASA AD 2021-0216 requires compliance in terms of
flight hours, this AD requires using hours time-in-service.
    (2) Where EASA AD 2021-0216 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (3) Where paragraph (1) of EASA AD 2021-0216 specifies ``in
accordance with the instructions of section 3.B of the ASB,'' for
this AD replace ``in accordance with the instructions of section 3.B
of the ASB'' with ``in accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraphs 3.B.2. through 3.B.2.b. of the of the
ASB.''
    (4) Where Note 1 of the service information referenced in EASA
AD 2021-0216 specifies to contact Airbus Helicopters if you have
more than one non-installed engine-MGB coupling shaft, this AD does
not require contacting Airbus Helicopters.
    (5) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2021-
0216 specifies to use a vibration scriber to re-identify the engine-
MGB coupling shaft, this AD allows the use of equivalent tooling.
    (6) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2021-
0216 specifies creating a log card for the engine-MGB coupling
shaft, this AD requires creating a log card or equivalent record.
    (7) This AD does not mandate compliance with the ``Remarks''
section of EASA AD 2021-0216.

(i) No Reporting Requirement

    Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2021-0216
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.

(j) Special Flight Permit

    Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199, provided no passengers are onboard.

(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the International Validation Branch, send
it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(2) of
this AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.

(l) Related Information

    (1) For EASA AD 2021-0216, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; internet www.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest
Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(817) 222-5110. This material may be found in the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2022-0005.
    (2) For more information about this AD, contact Andrea Jimenez,
Aerospace Engineer, COS Program Management Section, Operational
Safety Branch, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, FAA, 1600
Stewart Ave., Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone (516) 228-
7330; email [email protected].

    Issued on January 10, 2022.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-00884 Filed 1-19-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


(e) Prior to construction of the CCR landfill or any lateral
expansion of a CCR landfill, the owner or operator must obtain a
certification from a qualified professional engineer or approval from
the Participating State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the
permitting authority that the design of the composite liner (or, if
applicable, alternative composite liner) and the leachate collection
and removal system meets the requirements of this section.
    (f) Upon completion of construction of the CCR landfill or any
lateral expansion of a CCR landfill, the owner or operator must obtain
a certification from a qualified professional engineer or approval from
the Participating State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the
permitting authority that the design of the composite liner (or, if
applicable, alternative composite liner) and the leachate collection
and removal system have been constructed in accordance with the
requirements of this section.
* * * * *

0
9. Section 257.71 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.71  Liner design criteria for existing CCR surface
impoundments.

* * * * *
    (b) The owner or operator of the CCR unit must obtain a
certification from a qualified professional engineer or approval from
the Participating State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the
permitting authority attesting that the documentation as to whether a
CCR unit meets the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section is
accurate.
* * * * *

0
10. Section 257.72 is amended by revising paragraphs (c) and (d) to
read as follows:

Sec.  257.72  Liner design criteria for new CCR surface impoundments
and any lateral expansion of a CCR surface impoundment.

* * * * *
    (c) Prior to construction of the CCR surface impoundment or any
lateral expansion of a CCR surface impoundment, the owner or operator
must obtain certification from a qualified professional engineer or
approval from the Participating State Director or approval from EPA
where EPA is the permitting authority that the design of the composite
liner or, if applicable, the design of an alternative composite liner
complies with the requirements of this section.
    (d) Upon completion, the owner or operator must obtain
certification from a qualified professional engineer or approval from
the Participating State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the
permitting authority that the composite liner or if applicable, the
alternative composite liner has been constructed in accordance with the
requirements of this section.
* * * * *

0
11. Section 257.80 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(7) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.80  Air criteria.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (7) The owner or operator must obtain a certification from a
qualified professional engineer or approval from the Participating
State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting
authority that the initial CCR fugitive dust control plan, or any
subsequent amendment of it, meets the requirements of this section.
* * * * *

0
12. Section 257.81 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(5) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.81   Run-on and run-off controls for CCR landfills.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (5) The owner or operator must obtain a certification from a
qualified professional engineer or approval from the Participating
State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting
authority stating that the initial and periodic run-on and run-off
control system plans meet the requirements of this section.
* * * * *

0
13. Section 257.82 is amended by revising paragraph (c)(5) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.82   Hydrologic and hydraulic capacity requirements for CCR
surface impoundments.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (5) The owner or operator must obtain a certification from a
qualified professional engineer or approval from the Participating
State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting
authority stating that the initial and periodic inflow design flood
control system plans meet the requirements of this section.
* * * * *

0
14. Section 257.90 is amended by revising paragraph (a) and adding
paragraph (g) to read as follows:

Sec.  Sec.  257.90   Applicability.

    (a) All CCR landfills, CCR surface impoundments, and lateral
expansions of CCR units are subject to the groundwater monitoring and
corrective action requirements under Sec. Sec.  257.90 through 257.99,
except as provided in paragraph (g) of this section.
* * * * *
    (g) Suspension of groundwater monitoring requirements. (1) The
Participating State Director or EPA where EPA is the permitting
authority may suspend the groundwater monitoring requirements under
Sec. Sec.  257.90 through 257.95 for a CCR unit for a period of up to
ten years, if the owner or operator provides written documentation
that, based on the characteristics of the site in which the CCR unit is
located, there is no potential for migration of any of the constituents
listed in appendices III and IV to this part from that CCR unit to the
uppermost aquifer during the active life of the CCR unit and the post-
closure care period. This demonstration must be certified by a
qualified professional

engineer and approved by the Participating State Director or EPA where
EPA is the permitting authority, and must be based upon:
    (i) Site-specific field collected measurements, sampling, and
analysis of physical, chemical, and biological processes affecting
contaminant fate and transport, including at a minimum, the information
necessary to evaluate or interpret the effects of the following
properties or processes on contaminant fate and transport:
    (A) Aquifer Characteristics, including hydraulic conductivity,
hydraulic gradient, effective porosity, aquifer thickness, degree of
saturation, stratigraphy, degree of fracturing and secondary porosity
of soils and bedrock, aquifer heterogeneity, groundwater discharge, and
groundwater recharge areas;
    (B) Waste Characteristics, including quantity, type, and origin;
    (C) Climatic Conditions, including annual precipitation, leachate
generation estimates, and effects on leachate quality;
    (D) Leachate Characteristics, including leachate composition,
solubility, density, the presence of immiscible constituents, Eh, and
pH; and
    (E) Engineered Controls, including liners, cover systems, and
aquifer controls (e.g., lowering the water table). These must be
evaluated under design and failure conditions to estimate their long-
term residual performance.
    (ii) Contaminant fate and transport predictions that maximize
contaminant migration and consider impacts on human health and the
environment.
    (2) The owner or operator of the CCR unit may renew this suspension
for additional ten year periods by submitting written documentation
that the site characteristics continue to ensure there will be no
potential for migration of any of the constituents listed in Appendices
III and IV of this part. The documentation must include, at a minimum,
the information specified in paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (g)(1)(ii) of
this section and a certification by a qualified professional engineer
and approved by the State Director or EPA where EPA is the permitting
authority. The owner or operator must submit the documentation
supporting their renewal request for the state's or EPA's review and
approval of their extension one year before the groundwater monitoring
suspension is due to expire. If the existing groundwater monitoring
extension expires or is not approved, the owner or operator must begin
groundwater monitoring according to paragraph (a) of this section
within 90 days. The owner or operator may continue to renew the
suspension for ten-year periods, provided the owner or operator
demonstrate that the standard in paragraph (g)(1) of this section
continues to be met for the unit. The owner or operator must place each
completed demonstration in the facility's operating record.
    (3) The owner or operator of the CCR unit must include in the
annual groundwater monitoring and corrective action report required by
Sec.  257.90(e) or Sec.  257.100(e)(5)(ii) any approved no migration
demonstration.

0
15. Section 257.91 is amended by revising paragraph (f) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.91  Groundwater monitoring systems.

* * * * *
    (f) The owner or operator must obtain a certification from a
qualified professional engineer or approval from the Participating
State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting
authority stating that the groundwater monitoring system has been
designed and constructed to meet the requirements of this section. If
the groundwater monitoring system includes the minimum number of
monitoring wells specified in paragraph (c)(1) of this section, the
certification must document the basis supporting this determination.
* * * * *

0
16. Section 257.93 is amended by revising paragraph (f)(6) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.93   Groundwater sampling and analysis requirements.

* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (6) The owner or operator of the CCR unit must obtain a
certification from a qualified professional engineer or approval from
the Participating State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the
permitting authority stating that the selected statistical method is
appropriate for evaluating the groundwater monitoring data for the CCR
management area. The certification must include a narrative description
of the statistical method selected to evaluate the groundwater
monitoring data.
* * * * *

0
17. Section 257.94 is amended by revising paragraphs (d)(3) and (e)(2)
to read as follows:

Sec.  257.94  Detection monitoring program.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (3) The owner or operator must obtain a certification from a
qualified professional engineer or approval from the Participating
State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting
authority stating that the demonstration for an alternative groundwater
sampling and analysis frequency meets the requirements of this section.
The owner or operator must include the demonstration providing the
basis for the alternative monitoring frequency and the certification by
a qualified professional engineer or the approval from the
Participating State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the
permitting authority in the annual groundwater monitoring and
corrective action report required by Sec.  257.90(e).
    (e) * * *
    (2) The owner or operator may demonstrate that a source other than
the CCR unit caused the statistically significant increase over
background levels for a constituent or that the statistically
significant increase resulted from error in sampling, analysis,
statistical evaluation, or natural variation in groundwater quality.
The owner or operator must complete the written demonstration within 90
days of detecting a statistically significant increase over background
levels to include obtaining a certification from a qualified
professional engineer or approval from the Participating State Director
or approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority verifying
the accuracy of the information in the report. If a successful
demonstration is completed within the 90-day period, the owner or
operator of the CCR unit may continue with a detection monitoring
program under this section. If a successful demonstration is not
completed within the 90-day period, the owner or operator of the CCR
unit must initiate an assessment monitoring program as required under
Sec.  257.95. The owner or operator must also include the demonstration
in the annual groundwater monitoring and corrective action report
required by Sec.  257.90(e), in addition to the certification by a
qualified professional engineer or approval from the Participating
State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting
authority.
* * * * *

0
18. Section 257.95 is amended by revising paragraphs (c)(3),
(g)(3)(ii), (h)(2) and (3) to read as follows:

Sec.  257.95  Assessment monitoring program.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (3) The owner or operator must obtain a certification from a
qualified

professional engineer or approval from the Participating State Director
or approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority stating that
the demonstration for an alternative groundwater sampling and analysis
frequency meets the requirements of this section. The owner or operator
must include the demonstration providing the basis for the alternative
monitoring frequency and the certification by a qualified professional
engineer or the approval from the Participating State Director or the
approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority in the annual
groundwater monitoring and corrective action report required by Sec.
257.90(e).
* * * * *
    (g) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (ii) Demonstrate that a source other than the CCR unit caused the
contamination, or that the statistically significant increase resulted
from error in sampling, analysis, statistical evaluation, or natural
variation in groundwater quality. Any such demonstration must be
supported by a report that includes the factual or evidentiary basis
for any conclusions and must be certified to be accurate by a qualified
professional engineer or approval from the Participating State Director
or approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority. If a
successful demonstration is made, the owner or operator must continue
monitoring in accordance with the assessment monitoring program
pursuant to this section, and may return to detection monitoring if the
constituents in Appendix III and Appendix IV of this part are at or
below background as specified in paragraph (e) of this section. The
owner or operator must also include the demonstration in the annual
groundwater monitoring and corrective action report required by Sec.
257.90(e), in addition to the certification by a qualified professional
engineer or the approval from the Participating State Director or the
approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority.
* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (2) For the following constituents:
    (i) Cobalt 6 micrograms per liter ([mu]g/l);
    (ii) Lead 15 [mu]g/l;
    (iii) Lithium 40 [mu]g/l; and
    (iv) Molybdenum 100 [mu]g/l.
    (3) For constituents for which the background level is higher than
the levels identified under paragraphs (h)(1) and (h)(2) of this
section, the background concentration.
* * * * *

0
19. Section 257.96 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.96   Assessment of corrective measures.

    (a) Within 90 days of finding that any constituent listed in
Appendix IV to this part has been detected at a statistically
significant level exceeding the groundwater protection standard defined
under Sec.  257.95(h), or immediately upon detection of a release from
a CCR unit, the owner or operator must initiate an assessment of
corrective measures to prevent further releases, to remediate any
releases and to restore affected area to original conditions. The
assessment of corrective measures must be completed within 90 days,
unless the owner or operator demonstrates the need for additional time
to complete the assessment of corrective measures due to site-specific
conditions or circumstances. The owner or operator must obtain a
certification from a qualified professional engineer or approval from
the Participating State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the
permitting authority attesting that the demonstration is accurate. The
90-day deadline to complete the assessment of corrective measures may
be extended for no longer than 60 days. The owner or operator must also
include the demonstration in the annual groundwater monitoring and
corrective action report required by Sec.  257.90(e), in addition to
the certification by a qualified professional engineer or the approval
from the Participating State Director or the approval from EPA where
EPA is the permitting authority.
* * * * *

0
20. Section 257.97 is amended by revising paragraph (a) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.97  Selection of remedy.

    (a) Based on the results of the corrective measures assessment
conducted under Sec.  257.96, the owner or operator must, as soon as
feasible, select a remedy that, at a minimum, meets the standards
listed in paragraph (b) of this section. This requirement applies in
addition to, not in place of, any applicable standards under the
Occupational Safety and Health Act. The owner or operator must prepare
a semiannual report describing the progress in selecting and designing
the remedy. Upon selection of a remedy, the owner or operator must
prepare a final report describing the selected remedy and how it meets
the standards specified in paragraph (b) of this section. The owner or
operator must obtain a certification from a qualified professional
engineer or approval from the Participating State Director or approval
from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority that the remedy selected
meets the requirements of this section. The report has been completed
when it is placed in the operating record as required by Sec.
257.105(h)(12).
* * * * *

0
21. Section 257.98 is amended by revising paragraph (e) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.98  Implementation of the corrective action program.

* * * * *
    (e) Upon completion of the remedy, the owner or operator must
prepare a notification stating that the remedy has been completed. The
owner or operator must obtain a certification from a qualified
professional engineer or approval from the Participating State Director
or approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority attesting
that the remedy has been completed in compliance with the requirements
of paragraph (c) of this section. The report has been completed when it
is placed in the operating record as required by Sec.  257.105(h)(13).
* * * * *

0
22. Section 257.101 is amended by revising paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(1)
to read as follows:

Sec.  257.101   Closure or retrofit of CCR units.

    (a) * * *
    (1) Except as provided by paragraph (a)(3) of this section, if at
any time after October 19, 2015, an owner or operator of an existing
unlined CCR surface impoundment determines in any sampling event that
the concentrations of one or more constituents listed in appendix IV of
this part are detected at statistically significant levels above the
groundwater protection standard established under Sec.  257.95(h) for
such CCR unit, within six months of making such determination or no
later than October 31, 2020, whichever date is later, the owner or
operator of the existing unlined CCR surface impoundment must cease
placing CCR and non-CCR wastestreams into such CCR surface impoundment
and either retrofit or close the CCR unit in accordance with the
requirements of Sec.  257.102.
* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1)(i) Location standard under Sec.  257.60. Except as provided by
paragraph (b)(4) of this section, the owner or operator of an existing
CCR surface impoundment that has not demonstrated compliance with the
location standard specified in Sec.  257.60(a) must cease placing CCR
and non-CCR wastestreams into such CCR

unit no later than October 31, 2020, and close the CCR unit in
accordance with the requirements of Sec.  257.102.
    (ii) Location standards under Sec. Sec.  257.61 through 257.64.
Except as provided by paragraph (b)(4) of this section, within six
months of determining that an existing CCR surface impoundment has not
demonstrated compliance with any location standard specified in
Sec. Sec.  257.61(a), 257.62(a), 257.63(a), and 257.64(a), the owner or
operator of the CCR surface impoundment must cease placing CCR and non-
CCR wastestreams into such CCR unit and close the CCR unit in
accordance with the requirements of Sec.  257.102.
* * * * *

0
23. Section 257.102 is amended by revising paragraphs (b)(4),
(d)(3)(iii), (f)(3), (g), (h), (k)(2)(iv), (k)(4) and (k)(6) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.102  Criteria for conducting the closure or retrofit of CCR
units.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (4) The owner or operator of the CCR unit must obtain a written
certification from a qualified professional engineer or approval from
the Participating State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the
permitting authority that the initial and any amendment of the written
closure plan meets the requirements of this section.
* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (3) * * *
    (iii) The owner or operator of the CCR unit must obtain a written
certification from a qualified professional engineer or approval from
the Participating State Director or approval from EPA where EPA is the
permitting authority that the design of the final cover system meets
the requirements of this section.
* * * * *
    (f) * * *
    (3) Upon completion, the owner or operator of the CCR unit must
obtain a certification from a qualified professional engineer or
approval from the Participating State Director or approval from EPA
where EPA is the permitting authority verifying that closure has been
completed in accordance with the closure plan specified in paragraph
(b) of this section and the requirements of this section.
    (g) No later than the date the owner or operator initiates closure
of a CCR unit, the owner or operator must prepare a notification of
intent to close a CCR unit. The notification must include the
certification by a qualified professional engineer or the approval from
the Participating State Director or the approval from EPA where EPA is
the permitting authority for the design of the final cover system as
required by Sec.  257.102(d)(3)(iii), if applicable. The owner or
operator has completed the notification when it has been placed in the
facility's operating record as required by Sec.  257.105(i)(7).
    (h) Within 30 days of completion of closure of the CCR unit, the
owner or operator must prepare a notification of closure of a CCR unit.
The notification must include the certification by a qualified
professional engineer or the approval from the Participating State
Director or the approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority
as required by Sec.  257.102(f)(3). The owner or operator has completed
the notification when it has been placed in the facility's operating
record as required by Sec.  257.105(i)(8).
    (k) * * *
    (2) * * *
    (iv) The owner or operator of the CCR unit must obtain a written
certification from a qualified professional engineer or an approval
from the Participating State Director or an approval from EPA where EPA
is the permitting authority that the activities outlined in the written
retrofit plan, including any amendment of the plan, meet the
requirements of this section.
* * * * *
    (4) Upon completion, the owner or operator must obtain a written
certification from a qualified professional engineer or an approval
from the Participating State Director or an approval from EPA where EPA
is the permitting authority verifying that the retrofit activities have
been completed in accordance with the retrofit plan specified in
paragraph (k)(2) of this section and the requirements of this section.
* * * * *
    (6) Within 30 days of completing the retrofit activities specified
in paragraph (k)(1) of this section, the owner or operator must prepare
a notification of completion of retrofit activities. The notification
must include the certification from a qualified professional engineer
or an approval from the Participating State Director or an approval
from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority has is required by
paragraph (k)(4) of this section. The owner or operator has completed
the notification when it has been placed in the facility's operating
record as required by Sec.  257.105(j)(6).
* * * * *

0
24. Section 257.104 is amended by revising paragraphs (d)(1)(iii),
(d)(4) and (e) to read as follows:

Sec.  257.104   Post-closure care requirements.

* * * * *
    (d) * * *
    (1) * * *
    (iii) A description of the planned uses of the property during the
post-closure period. Post-closure use of the property shall not disturb
the integrity of the final cover, liner(s), or any other component of
the containment system, or the function of the monitoring systems
unless necessary to comply with the requirements in this subpart. Any
other disturbance is allowed if the owner or operator of the CCR unit
demonstrates that disturbance of the final cover, liner, or other
component of the containment system, including any removal of CCR, will
not increase the potential threat to human health or the environment.
The demonstration must be certified by a qualified professional
engineer or approved by the Participating State Director or approved
from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority, and notification shall
be provided to the State Director that the demonstration has been
placed in the operating record and on the owners or operator's publicly
accessible internet site.
* * * * *
    (4) The owner or operator of the CCR unit must obtain a written
certification from a qualified professional engineer or an approval
from the Participating State Director or an approval from EPA where EPA
is the permitting authority that the initial and any amendment of the
written post-closure plan meets the requirements of this section.
    (e) Notification of completion of post-closure care period. No
later than 60 days following the completion of the post-closure care
period, the owner or operator of the CCR unit must prepare a
notification verifying that post-closure care has been completed. The
notification must include the certification by a qualified professional
engineer or the approval from the Participating State Director or the
approval from EPA where EPA is the permitting authority verifying that
post-closure care has been completed in accordance with the closure
plan specified in paragraph (d) of this section and the requirements of
this section. The owner or operator has completed the notification when
it has been placed in the facility's operating record as required by
Sec.  257.105(i)(13).
* * * * *

0
25. Section 257.105 is amended by adding paragraph (h)(14) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.105  Recordkeeping requirements.

* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (14) The demonstration, including long-term performance data,
supporting the suspension of groundwater monitoring requirements as
required by Sec.  257.90(g).
* * * * *

0
26. Section 257.106 is amended by adding paragraph (h)(11) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.106   Notification requirements.

* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (11) Provide the demonstration supporting the suspension of
groundwater monitoring requirements specified under Sec.
257.105(h)(14).
* * * * *

0
27. Section 257.107 is amended by adding paragraph (h)(11) to read as
follows:

Sec.  257.107  Publicly accessible internet site requirements.

* * * * *
    (h) * * *
    (11) The demonstration supporting the suspension of groundwater
monitoring requirements specified under Sec.  257.105(h)(14).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-16262 Filed 7-27-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: November 6, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 214)]
[Notices]
[Page 65023-65024]
[DOCID:fr06no06-72]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54673; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2006-78]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Market
Maker Transaction Fees and Credits

October 30, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 23, 2006, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange''), through its
wholly-owned subsidiary NYSE Arca Equities, Inc. (``NYSE Arca
Equities''), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange has designated this proposal as one establishing or changing a
due, fee, or other charge imposed by the Exchange under 19(b)(3)(A)(ii)
of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which renders it
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend the section of its Schedule of Fees
and Charges for Exchange Services (the ``Fee Schedule'') that applies
to Market Maker \5\ fees and charges. The text of the proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.nysearca.com
), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at

the Commission's Public Reference Room.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(u).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

 1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend the section of its Fee Schedule that
applies to Market Maker fees and charges.
    Market Maker Transaction Fees and Credits--Round Lots. The Fee
Schedule currently provides that Market Makers are entitled to a $0.001
per share credit for round-lot transactions in NYSE-listed securities.
This credit is applicable to Q orders executed against other
participants' orders. The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule
to increase this credit to $0.002 per share and to clarify that it will
apply to orders that provide liquidity to the NYSE Arca Book (the
``Book'') in securities for which the Market Makers are registered as
Market Makers. The Exchange proposes this change so that the credit
given to Market Makers is consistent with the $0.002 per share credit
given to all ETP Holders \6\ executing round-lot transactions in NYSE-
listed securities in the Book against inbound orders. The Exchange
further proposes this change so that the credit given to Market Makers
submitting such orders in NYSE-listed securities is the same as the
credit given to Market Makers submitting such orders in other listed
securities and Nasdaq securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(n).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Fee Schedule currently provides that the $.002 per share credit
that Market Makers are entitled to for round-lot transactions in listed
securities (other than NYSE-listed securities) and Nasdaq securities
applies to Q orders executed against other participants' orders. The
Exchange proposes to amend this language to clarify that the credit
applies to orders that provide

liquidity to the Book in securities for which the Market Makers are
registered as Market Makers. The Exchange proposes this language so
that the application of this credit is consistent with the application
of the credit for Market Makers and other ETP Holders executing round-
lot transactions in NYSE-listed securities.
    The Fee Schedule currently does not specifically set forth a fee
for Market Maker round-lot transactions in NYSE-listed securities,
other listed securities or Nasdaq securities that take liquidity from
the Book. The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to set forth
a $.003 per share fee for all such orders. The Exchange proposes this
change so that it is clear that Market Makers are subject to the same
$.003 per share fee that is charged to all ETP Holders executing round-
lot transactions in NYSE-listed securities, other listed securities,
and Nasdaq securities that take liquidity from the Book.
    Market Maker Transaction Fees and Credits--Odd Lots. The Fee
Schedule currently provides that Market Makers are entitled to a $0.02
per share credit for transactions in Nasdaq securities that execute
against odd-lot orders in the Odd Lot Tracking Order Process, as
defined in NYSE Arca Equities Rule 7.31(g). The Exchange proposes to
eliminate this credit because the Exchange no longer wishes to provide
the additional financial incentive to Market Makers for providing
liquidity in Nasdaq odd-lot transactions.
    Lead Market Maker Transaction Fees and Credits--Odd Lots. The Fee
Schedule currently provides that Lead Market Makers \7\ executing odd-
lot transactions in NYSE Arca Marketplace primary listed securities are
entitled to a $0.02 per share credit for such transactions. The
Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to clarify that such credit
applies to orders that provide liquidity to the Book in securities for
which the Lead Market Maker is registered as the Lead Market Maker. The
Exchange proposes this change in order to make the application of this
credit consistent with the application of the transaction credits to
Market Makers and ETP Holders generally.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See NYSE Arca Equities Rule 1.1(ccc).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
Section 6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it is an
equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among
its members and issuers and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change does not impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \10\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
\11\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of such
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NYSEArca-2006-78 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2006-78. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2006-78 and should be submitted on or before
November 27, 2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 [FR Doc. E6-18632 Filed 11-3-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 52 (Monday, March 18, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9778-9779]
[FR Doc No: 2019-04970]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0751; FRL-9989-68]

Interim Registration Review Decisions and Case Closures for
Several Pesticides; Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA's interim
registration review decision for the following chemicals: Ammonia and
Ammonium Sulfate, Azoxystrobin, Benfluralin, Chloropropham, Clomazone,
Cytokinins, Dichlobenil, Diflufenzopyr and Diflufenzopyr-sodium,
Fenhexamid, Fluopicolide, Fluridone, Indole-3-Butyric Acid, Indoxacarb,
Naphthenate Salts, Nuranone, Prometryn, Spinetoram, Spinosad,
Trifloxystrobin, and (Z)-9-tricosene. It also announces the amended
interim decisions for Ethalfluralin and Hexazinone. In addition, it
announces the closure of the registration review case for triforine
because the last U.S. registrations for this pesticide have been
canceled.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this action apply to me?

    This action is directed to the public in general and may be of
interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human
health, farm worker, and agricultural advocates; the chemical industry;
pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale,
distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others also may be
interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific
entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions
regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity,
consult the pesticide specific contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
    For pesticide specific information, contact: The Chemical Review
Manager for the pesticide of interest identified in the Table in Unit
IV.
    For general information on the registration review program,
contact: Dana Friedman, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division (7508P),
Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:
(703) 347-8827; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
II. Background

    Registration review is EPA's periodic review of pesticide
registrations to ensure that each pesticide continues to satisfy the
statutory standard for registration, that is, the pesticide can perform
its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on human
health or the environment. As part of the registration review process,
the Agency has completed interim decisions for all pesticides listed in
the Table in Unit IV. Through this program, EPA is ensuring that each
pesticide's registration is based on current scientific and other
knowledge, including its effects on human health and the environment.

III. Authority

    EPA is conducting its registration review of the chemicals listed
in the Table in Unit IV pursuant to section 3(g) of the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the Procedural
Regulations for Registration Review at 40 CFR part 155, subpart C.
Section 3(g) of FIFRA provides, among other things, that the
registrations of pesticides are to be reviewed every 15 years. Under
FIFRA, a pesticide product may be registered or remain registered only
if it meets the statutory standard for registration given in FIFRA
section 3(c)(5) (7 U.S.C. 136a(c)(5)). When used in accordance with
widespread and commonly recognized practice, the pesticide product must
perform its intended function without unreasonable adverse effects on
the environment; that is, without any unreasonable risk to man or the
environment, or a human dietary risk from residues that result from the
use of a pesticide in or on food.

IV. What action is the agency taking?

    Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58, this notice announces the availability
of EPA's interim registration review decisions for the pesticides shown
in the following table. The interim registration review decisions are
supported by rationales included in the docket established for each
chemical.

                            Table--Registration Review Interim Decisions Being Issued
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Registration review case name and                                           Chemical review manager and contact
                No.                               Docket ID No.                          information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ammonia and Ammonium Sulfate, Case   EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0684..................  Stephen Savage,
 Numbers 7440 & 5073<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-
                                                                              0345.
Azoxystrobin, Case Number 7020.....  EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0835..................  Veronica Dutch,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 308-
                                                                              8585.
Benfluralin, Case 2030.............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0931..................  Michelle Nolan,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-
                                                                              0258.
Chlorpropham, Case 0271............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0923..................  Marianne Mannix,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-
                                                                              0275.
Clomazone, Case 7203...............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0113..................  Tiffany Green,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-
                                                                              0314.
Cytokininsm, Case 4107.............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0671..................  Daniel Schoeff,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-
                                                                              0143.
Dichlobenil, Case 0263.............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0395..................  Nathan Sell<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Diflufenzopyr and Diflufenzopyr-     EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0911..................  Jill Bloom<EMAIL_ADDRESS> sodium, Case 7246.<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Ethalfluralin, Case 2260...........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0094..................  Patricia Biggio,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-
                                                                              0547.
Fenhexamid, Case 7027..............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0187..................  Susan Bartow<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Fluopicolide, Case 7055............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0037..................  Eric Fox<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                              347-0104.
Fluridone, Case 7200...............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0160..................  Leigh Rimmer<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Hexazinone Case 0266...............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0755..................  Melanie Biscoe,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 305-
                                                                              7106.
Indole-3-Butyric Acid (IBA), Case    EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0608..................  Seiichi Murasaki,
 2330<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                              347-0163.
Indoxacarb, Case 7613..............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0367..................  Moana Appleyard,
                                                                              appleyard.moana@epa.gov,(703) 308-
                                                                              8175.
Naphthenate Salts, Case 3099.......  EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0455..................  Rachel Ricciardi,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                              347-0465.
Nuranone, Case 4113................  EPA-HQ-OPP-2012-0126..................  Susanne Cerrelli,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                              308-8077.
Prometryn, Case 0467...............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0032..................  Christina Scheltema,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                              308-2201.
Spinetoram, Case 7448..............  EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0666..................  Jordan Page<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Spinosad, Case 7421................  EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0667..................  Jordan Page<EMAIL_ADDRESS><PHONE_NUMBER>.
Trifloxystrobin, Case 7028.........  EPA-HQ-OPP-2013-0074..................  Samantha Thoma,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703) 347-
                                                                              0514.
(Z)-9-tricosene (Muscalure), Case    EPA-HQ-OPP-2010-0925..................  Alexandra Boukedes,
 4112<EMAIL_ADDRESS>(703)
                                                                              347-0305.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed interim registration review decisions for the
chemicals in the table above were posted to the docket and the public
was invited to submit any comments or new information. EPA addressed
the comments or information received during the 60-day comment period
for the proposed interim decisions in the discussion for each pesticide
listed in the table. Comments from the 60-day comment period that were
received may or may not have affected the Agency's interim decision.
Pursuant to 40 CFR 155.58(c), the registration review case docket for
the chemicals listed in the Table will remain open until all actions
required in the interim decision have been completed.
    This document also announces the posting of the amended interim
decisions for ethalfluralin and hexazinone. The original interim
decision for ethalfluralin was published on December 15, 2017 (82 FR
59606) (FRL-9970-54) and the original interim decision for hexazinone
as published on February 27, 2018 (83 FR 8472) (FRL-9973-09). Following
issuance of these decisions, the agency received information that
resulted in it amending the required label modifications. These
modifications are expected to allow applicators greater flexibility,
while not affecting the agency's overall risk management
determinations.
    This document also announces the closure of the registration review
case for triforine (Case 2720, Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2015-0853)
because the last U.S. registrations for this pesticide have been
canceled. Background on the registration review program is provided at:
http://www.epa.gov/pesticide-reevaluation.

    Authority:  7 U.S.C. 136 et seq.

    Dated: March 5, 2019.
Charles Smith,
Acting Director, Pesticide Re-Evaluation Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
[FR Doc. 2019-04970 Filed 3-15-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: March 7, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 44)]
[Notices]
[Page 10201]
[DOCID:fr07mr07-87]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL07-37-000]

Californians for Renewable Energy, Inc. (CARE), Complainant, v.
California Public Utilities Commission, Southern California Edison, and
Long Beach Generation, LLC Respondents; Notice of Complaint

February 28, 2007.
    Take notice that on February 22, 2007, Californians for Renewable
Energy, Inc. (CARE) tendered for filing pursuant to section 206 of the
Federal Power Act a complaint against the California Public Utilities
Commission (CPUC) for its action on January 25, 2007 authorizing
Southern California Edison Company to enter into a 10-year power
purchase agreement with Long Beach Generation, LLC, in alleged
violation of the ``filed rate doctrine''. CARE requests the contract be
subject to the Commission's review under the December 19, 2006 opinions
by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, PUD v. FERC and PUC
v. FERC.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 26, 2007.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-3983 Filed 3-6-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: August 6, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 152)]
[Notices]
[Page 45753-45755]
[DOCID:fr06au08-53]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings  1

July 30, 2008.
    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC08-114-000.
    Applicants: GSC Acquisition Company, GSCAC Holdings I LLC, GSCAC
Holdings II LLC, GSCAC Merger Sub LLC, Complete Energy Holdings, LLC,
LSP Energy Limited Partnership, La Paloma Generating Company, LLC.
    Description: Joint Application for Approval of the Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities Under Section 203 of the Federal Power Act of
GSC Acquisition Company.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-5041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER97-2801-022.
    Applicants: PacifiCorp.
    Description: PacifiCorp submits a Substitute First Revised Sheet.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0118.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER98-4400-010.
    Applicants: Pittsfield Generating Company, L.P.
    Description: Pittsfield Generating Company, LP submits Appendix as
a revised table of all generation assets controlled by it and its
affiliates grouped by balancing authority area.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0076.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 13, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-1526-010.
    Applicants: Newington Energy, L.L.C.
    Description: Newington Energy, LLC submits a non-material change in
status.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0035.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 13, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-3001-021; ER03-647-012.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: Compliance Filing of The New York Independent System
Operator, Inc.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-5083.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER02-2559-008; ER02-669-008; ER00-2391-009; ER00-
3068-008; ER98-3511-012; ER02-1903-009; ER99-2917-010; ER98-3566-015;
ER98-3563-012; ER98-3564-013; ER02-2120-006; ER05-714-003; ER03-623-
008; ER04-290-004; ER04-187-006; ER01-1710-011; ER01-2139-012; ER02-
2166-008; ER05-236-006; ER02-1838-008; ER03-1375-005.
    Applicants: Backbone Mountain Windpower LLC; Bayswater Peaking
Facility, LLC; Doswell Limited Partnership; FPL Energy Cape, LLC; FPL
Energy Maine Hydro, LLC; FPL Energy Marcus Hook, L.P.; FPL Energy MH
50, LP; FPL Energy Power Marketing, Inc.; FPL Energy Wyman, LLC; FPL
Energy Wyman IV, LLC; FPLE Rhode Island State Energy, L.P; Gexa Energy
LLC; Jamaica Bay Peaking Facility, LLC; Meyersdale Windpower, LLC;
Badger Windpower, LLC; North Jersey Energy Associates, a L.P.; Mill Run
Windpower, LLC; Somerset Windpower, LLC; Pennsylvania Windfarms, Inc.;
Northeast Energy Associates, LP; FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC; Waymart Wind
Farm L.P.;
    Description: FPLE Companies submits revised tariff sheets in
compliance with the two orders.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0116.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-1331-003; ER01-2543-005; ER01-2544-005; ER01-
2545-005; ER01-2546-005; ER01-2547-005; ER08-110-003.
    Applicants: CalPeak Power LLC; CalPeak Power-Panoche LLC; CalPeak
Power-Vaca Dixon LLC; CalPeak Power-El Cajon LLC; CalPeak Power-
Enterprise LLC; CalPeak Power-Border LLC; Starwood Power-Midway, LLC.
    Description: The California Generators submit a non-material change
in status in compliance with Order 652.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0044.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER01-1071-011; ER06-9-006; ER05-1281-006; ER03-34-
010; ER06-1261-005; ER03-1104-007; ER03-1105-007; ER06-1392-004; ER07-
904-002; ER07-1157-003; ER07-174-005; ER07-875-002.
    Applicants: Badger Windpower, LLC, FPL Energy Burleigh County Wind,
LLC; FPL Energy Duane Arnold, LLC; FPL Energy Hancock County Wind, LLC;
FPL Energy Mower County, LLC; FPL Energy North Dakota Wind, LLC; FPL
Energy North Dakota Wind II, LLC; FPL Energy Oliver Wind, LLC; FPL
ENERGY POINT BEACH, LLC; Logan Wind Energy LLC; Osceola Windpower, LLC;
Peetz Table Wind Energy, LLC.
    Description: FPLE Companies submits notice of change in status and
Substitute First Revised Sheet 3 in compliance with FERC's Order 697
and 697-A.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0138.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER02-1785-017.
    Applicants: Thermo Cogeneration Partnership LP.
    Description: Thermo Cogeneration Partnership, LP submits a notice
of non-material change in status and revised tariff in compliance with
Order 687-A.
    Filed Date: 7/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0042.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER02-1903-008.
    Applicants: FPL Energy Marcus Hook, L.P.
    Description: FPL Energy Marcus Hook, LP requests that the
Commission accept the 6/6/08 change in status and tariff changes in
conjunction etc.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0119.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER04-230-037.
    Applicants: New York Independent System Operator, Inc.
    Description: The New York Independent System Operator, Inc submits
Second Revised Sheet 424 et al. to FERC Electric Tariff, Original
Volume 2.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080724-0030.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER05-1178-013; ER05-1191-013.
    Applicants: Gila River Power, L.P.; Union Power Partners, L.P.
    Description: Gila River Power, LP et al. submits Substitute First
Revised Sheet 1 et al. to FERC Electric Tariff, First Revised Volume 1
in compliance with Order 697-A.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080724-0168.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 4, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-738-011; ER06-739-011.

    Applicants: Cogen Technologies Linden Venture, L.P.; East Coast
Power Linden Holding, L.L.C.
    Description: Cogen Technologies Linden Venture LP et al. submits
First Revised Volume 1 to the aforementioned tariffs.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0117.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER06-739-016; ER06-738-016; ER03-983-013; ER07-501-
014; ER02-537-018; ER07-758-010; ER08-649-006.
    Applicants: East Coast Power Linden Holding, LLC; Cogen
Technologies Linden Venture, L.P.; Fox Energy Co. LLC; Shady Hills
Power Company; Birchwood Power Partners, L.P.; Inland Empire Energy
Center, L.L.C.; EFS Parlin Holdings, LLC.
    Description: Notice of Non-Material Change in Status of General
Electric Companies.
    Filed Date: 07/28/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-5109.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Monday, August 18, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-501-012; ER98-1767-012; ER99-1695-013; ER99-
2984-011.
    Applicants: Birchwood Power Partners; Tenaska Frontier Parters,
Ltd.; Elwood Energy, LLC; Green County Energy, LLC.
    Description: J-Power North America Holdings, Ltd requests that FERC
accept its notice of non-material change in status, to be effective as
of 9/18/07.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0071.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 13, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER07-1372-010.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits proposed clarifications and revisions to the Open Access
Transmission.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0070.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 13, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-54-005.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc.
    Description: The Participating Transmission Owners Administrative
Committee submits amendments to the ISO Tariff to comply with FERC's
Order 890.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0034.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-371-002.
    Applicants: Cooperative Energy Incorporated.
    Description: Cooperative Energy Incorporated submits its FERC Rate
Schedule 1, Substitute Original Sheet 1 attached as Appendix A to
comply with Order 697.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0120.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-506-000; ER08-506-001.
    Applicants: Southern Company Services.
    Description: Motion to withdraw filing and terminate proceeding of
Southern Company Services, Inc.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-876-001; ER08-1006-001; ER08-1078-001; ER08-
1079-001.
    Applicants: Entergy Services, Inc.
    Description: Entergy Services, Inc responds to FERC's 6/23/08 data
request.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0072.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 13, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1025-002.
    Applicants: The Connecticut Light and Power Company.
    Description: Northeast Utilities Service Company submits an
Interconnection Agreement that contains the updated versions of
Schedules D and E.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0046.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1164-001.
    Applicants: Escanaba Paper Co.
    Description: Escanaba Paper Co. submits clarification on future
PURPA sales and revised tariff sheets.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0043.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1172-001.
    Applicants: Grand Ridge Energy LLC.
    Description: Grand Ridge Energy LLC submits a supplement to the
market-based rate application filed on 6/30/08.
    Filed Date: 07/23/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0069.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, August 13, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1286-000.
    Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
    Description: Pacific Gas and Electric Company submits Revised Rate
Schedule 114 with the City and County of San Francisco.
    Filed Date: 07/22/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080723-0033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 12, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1287-000.
    Applicants: Nevada Power Company.
    Description: Nevada Power Company submits an executed Agreement for
Dynamic Scheduling of the Apex Generating Station between Nevada Power
Company and Las Vegas Power Company.
    Filed Date: 07/22/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080723-0032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 12, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1288-000.
    Applicants: Wapsipinicon Wind Project LLC.
    Description: Wapsipinicon Wind Project, LLC submits its market-
based rate application.
    Filed Date: 07/22/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-0073.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, August 12, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1293-000.
    Applicants: Crystal Lake Wind, LLC.
    Description: Crystal Lake Wind, LLC submit its application for
Market-based rates.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080729-0137.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1296-000.
    Applicants: Osceola Windpower II, LLC.
    Description: Osceola Windpower II, LLC's CD containing the FPL MISO
Wind Workpapers to their request for authorization to sell energy and
capacity at market-based rates and waiver of the 60-day notice
requirement.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-4005.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1297-000.
    Applicants: Ashtabula Wind, LLC.
    Description: Ashtabula Wind LLC's CD containing the FPL MISO Wind
Workpapers to their application for market based rate authority.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-4004.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1301-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits a Large Generator Interconnection Agreement.

    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0041.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1302-000.
    Applicants: Midwest Independent Transmission System.
    Description: Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc
submits an Amended and Restated Generator Interconnection Agreement.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0040.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1303-000.
    Applicants: Southern Company Services, Inc.
    Description: Southern Company Services, Inc on behalf of the
Southern Companies submits a rollover network integration transmission
service agreement.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1304-000.
    Applicants: Northeast Utilities Service Company.
    Description: Public Service Co of New Hampshire submits the
executed Design, Engineering and Procurement Agreement for Noble
Granite Reliable Wind Park.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0032.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1305-000.
    Applicants: Northeast Utilities Service Company.
    Description: Public Service Co. of New Hampshire submits the
executed Design, Engineering and Procurement Agreement for Indeck
Energy Alexandria, LLC.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0031.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1306-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool Inc.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool Inc. submits an executed Service
Agreement for Network Transmission Service etc.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080729-0001.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: ER08-1307-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool.
    Description: Southwest Power Pool Inc. submits an executed Service
Agreement for Network Integration Transmission Service with
Southwestern Public Service Company as Network etc.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080729-0003.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following open access
transmission tariff filings:
    Docket Numbers: OA07-37-002.
    Applicants: E. ON U.S. LLC.
    Description: E.ON U.S. LLC on behalf of Louisville Gas and Electric
Co et al. submits revisions to the Open Access Transmission Tariff in
compliance with Order 890.
    Filed Date: 07/24/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080728-0045.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, August 14, 2008.

    Docket Numbers: OA08-22-001.
    Applicants: Florida Power Corporation.
    Description: Compliance Filing re rollover rights of Florida Power
Corp. d/b/a Progress Energy Florida, Inc.
    Filed Date: 07/25/2008.
    Accession Number: 20080725-5033.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on Friday, August 15, 2008.

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment
date. It is not necessary to separately intervene again in a subdocket
related to a compliance filing if you have previously intervened in the
same docket. Protests will be considered by the Commission in
determining the appropriate action to be taken, but will not serve to
make protestants parties to the proceeding. Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy of that document on the
Applicant. In reference to filings initiating a new proceeding,
interventions or protests submitted on or before the comment deadline
need not be served on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St. NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above proceedings are accessible in the
Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list. They are also available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link
on the web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification
when a document is added to a subscribed dockets(s). For assistance
with any FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-18041 Filed 8-5-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P