[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 100 (Friday, May 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 31199]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4536-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

Mississippi; Amendment No. 2 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Mississippi (FEMA-4536-DR), dated April 16, 2020, and
related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued May 8, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the State of Mississippi is hereby amended to include debris
removal and permanent work under the Public Assistance program for
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of April
16, 2020.

    Covington, Jefferson Davis, and Jones Counties for Public
Assistance [Categories A and C-G] (already designated for Individual
Assistance and assistance for emergency protective measures
[Category B], including direct federal assistance, under the Public
Assistance program).

The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA)
are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community
Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis Counseling;
97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment
Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance Grant; 97.048,
Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and Households In
Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049, Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing Operations for
Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially Declared Disaster
Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other Needs; 97.036,
Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially Declared
Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-11102 Filed 5-21-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register: October 3, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 190)]
[Notices]
[Page 57582]
[DOCID:fr03oc05-73]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. OA97-237-020, OA97-608-009, ER97-1079-010, ER97-4421-009,
ER97-3574-009, ER98-499-008]

New England Power Pool; Notice of Filing

September 26, 2005.
    Take notice that on September 20, 2005, an informational filing was
made by the New England Power Pool (NEPOOL) participants committee
relating to rate surcharges determined in accordance with the formula
rates of the Restated NEPOOL Open Access Transmission Tariff for
transmission charges in effect in the period June 1, 2004 through and
including January 31, 2005. NEPOOL states that this informational
filing updates an informational filing dated December 9, 2004 made
previously in the above-captioned proceedings.
    NEPOOL states that copies of these materials were sent to the New
England state governors and regulatory commissions and the Participants
in NEPOOL.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. eastern time on October 4, 2005.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-5392 Filed 9-30-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 87 (Thursday, May 5, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25764-25766]
[FR Doc No: 2011-11016]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration

[Docket No. FMCSA-2011-0079]

Qualification of Drivers; Exemption Applications; Vision

AGENCY: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of applications for exemptions; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: FMCSA announces receipt of applications from 14 individuals
for exemption from the vision requirement in the Federal Motor Carrier
Safety Regulations. If granted, the exemptions would enable these
individuals to qualify as drivers of commercial motor vehicles (CMVs)
in interstate commerce without meeting the Federal vision standard.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 6, 2011.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments bearing the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) Docket No. FMCSA-2011-0079 using any of the
following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility; U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery: West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays.
     Fax: 1-202-493-2251.
    Instructions: Each submission must include the Agency name and the
docket numbers for this notice. Note

that all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading below for further information.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments, go to http://www.regulations.gov at any time or Room W12-140
on the ground level of the West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The FDMS is available 24 hours each day, 365
days each year. If you want acknowledgment that we received your
comments, please include a self-addressed, stamped envelope or postcard
or print the acknowledgement page that appears after submitting
comments on-line.
    Privacy Act: Anyone may search the electronic form of all comments
received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or of the person signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review DOT's Privacy Act Statement for the FDMS published in
the Federal Register on January 17, 2008 (73 FR 3316), or you may visit
http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2008/pdf/E8-785.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Mary D. Gunnels, Director, Medical
Programs,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>FMCSA, Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room W64-224, Washington,
DC 20590-0001. Office hours are from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Under 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA may grant an exemption
from the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Regulations for a 2-year period
if it finds ``such exemption would likely achieve a level of safety
that is equivalent to, or greater than, the level that would be
achieved absent such exemption.'' FMCSA can renew exemptions at the end
of each 2-year period. The 14 individuals listed in this notice have
each requested such an exemption from the vision requirement in 49 CFR
391.41(b)(10), which applies to drivers of CMVs in interstate commerce.
Accordingly, the Agency will evaluate the qualifications of each
applicant to determine whether granting an exemption will achieve the
required level of safety mandated by statute.

Qualifications of Applicants

Jan M. Bernath

    Mr. Bernath, age 53, has no light perception in his right eye due
to brain and ocular trauma that occurred in 1996. The best corrected
visual acuity in his right eye is no light perception and in his left
eye, 20/20. Following an examination in 2011, his optometrist noted,
``My medical opinion is that this patient has sufficient vision
function to perform the driving tasks required to operate a commerical
vehicle.'' Mr. Bernath reported that he has driven straight trucks for
30 years, accumulating 180,000 miles and tractor-trailer combinations
for 25 years, accumulating 125,000 miles. He holds a Class A Commercial
Driver's License (CDL) from Ohio. His driving record for the last 3
years shows no crashes and no convictions for moving violations in a
CMV.

Jason M. Birrenkott

    Mr. Birrenkot, 38, has had ectopia lentis with cataract in his left
eye since birth. The best corrected visual acuity in his right eye is
20/20 and in his left eye, count-finger vision. Following an
examination in 2010, his optometrist noted, ``I certify, in my medical
opinion, that Mr. Birrenkott has sufficient vision to perform the
driving tasks required to operate a commercial vehicle.'' Mr.
Birrenkott reported that he has driven straight trucks for 9 years,
accumulating 162,000 miles. He holds a Class D operator's license from
North Dakota. His driving record for the last 3 years shows no crashes
and no convictions for moving violations in a CMV.

John E. Edler, lll

    Mr. Edler, 50, has had a retinal scar in his right eye since 1979.
The best corrected visual acuity in his right eye is 20/400 and in his
left eye, 20/20. Following an examination in 2011, his optometrist
noted, ``It is my understanding that Mr. Edler has maintained a safe
driving record for many years and has always driven with the visual
disability of the right eye. Since it has always been present, he has
functioned well, and his peripheral visual acuity is excellent. There
is no reason to believe that he cannot continue to operate commercial
vehicles.'' Mr. Edler reported that he has driven straight trucks for
31 years, accumulating 77,500 miles and tractor-trailer combinations
for 29 years, accumulating 232,000 miles. He holds a Class A CDL from
Delaware. His driving record for the last 3 years shows no crashes and
no convictions for moving violations in a CMV.

Saul E. Fierro

    Mr. Fierro, 37, has a macular scar in his left eye due to a
traumatic injury sustained as a child. The best corrected visual acuity
in his right eye is 20/20 and in his left eye, 20/200. Following an
examination in 2010, his optometrist noted, ``In my opinion, I believe
that Saul has sufficient vision to perform the driving tasks required
to operate a commercial vehicle.'' Mr. Fierro reported that he has
driven straight trucks for 4 years, accumulating 57,600 miles. He holds
a Class D operator's license from Arizona. His driving record for the
last 3 years shows no crashes and no convictions for moving violations
in a CMV.

Mark T. Gileau

    Mr. Gileau, 44, has had amblyopia in his right eye since childhood.
The best corrected visual acuity in his right eye is count-finger
vision and in his left eye, 20/15. Following an examination in 2010,
his ophthalmologist noted, ``Mr. Gileau has been driving commercial
vehicles for a number of years with his present level of vision without
incident and because of this I feel he has sufficient vision to perform
driving tasks required to operate a commercial vehicle.'' Mr. Gileau
reported that he has driven tractor-trailer combinations for 20 years,
accumulating 240,000 miles. He holds a Class A CDL from Connecticut.
His driving record for the last 3 years shows no crashes and no
convictions for moving violations in a CMV.

Peter D. Gouge

    Mr. Gouge, 60, has a macular scar in his left eye due to a
traumatic injury that occurred in 1976. The best corrected visual
acuity in his right eye is 20/20 and in his left eye, count-finger
vision. Following an examination in 2010, his optometrist noted, ``I,
Karen Anderson certify in my medical opinion is that Mr. Peter Gouge
has sufficient vision function to perform the driving tasks required to
operate a commercial vehicle.'' Mr. Gouge reported that he has driven
straight trucks for 27 years, accumulating 21,600 miles and tractor-
trailer combinations for 27 years, accumulating 1.2 million miles. He
holds a Class A CDL from Iowa. His driving record for the last 3 years
shows no crashes but one conviction for speeding in a CMV. He exceeded
the speed limit by 10 Miles Per Hour (MPH).

Thomas M. Harris

    Mr. Harris, 59, has had amblyopia in his left eye since birth. The
best corrected visual acuity in his right eye is 20/20 and in his left
eye, 20/100. Following an examination in 2010, his optometrist noted,
``Tom unquestionably has the acuity, field, and perceptual skills to
perform commercial driving tasks as he has been conducting for many
years.'' Mr. Harris reported that he has driven straight trucks for 13
years, accumulating 507,000 miles. He holds a Class B CDL from
Michigan. His driving record for the last 3 years shows no crashes and
no convictions for moving violations in a CMV.

Paul M. Hinkson

    Mr. Hinkson, 43, has complete loss of vision in his right eye since
childhood. The best corrected visual acuity in his left eye is 20/20.
Following an examination in 2010, his optometrist noted, ``Mr. Hinkson
is fully capable of performing all vision tasks required to operate a
commercial motor vehicle in interstate commerce.'' Mr. Hinkson reported
that he has driven straight trucks for 16 years, accumulating 320,000
miles. He holds a Class A CDL from Tennessee. His driving record for
the last 3 years shows no crashes and no convictions for moving
violations in a CMV.

Lyle H. Lightner

    Mr. Lightner, 60, has loss of vision in his left eye due to a
traumatic injury sustained at age 3. The best corrected visual acuity
in his right eye is 20/20 and in his left eye, no light perception.
Following an examination in 2011, his optometrist noted, ``In summary,
Mr. Lightner's visual condition is stable and is sufficient to perform
required commerical driving tasks.'' Mr. Lightner reported that he has
driven straight trucks for 40 years, accumulating 1.6 million miles. He
holds a Class C Chauffeur's license from Michigan. His driving record
for the last 3 years shows no crashes and no convictions for moving
violations in a CMV.

Ellie L. Murphree

    Mr. Murphree, 69, has had central retinal atrophy in his right eye
since 2007. The best corrected visual acuity in his right eye is 20/400
and in his left eye, 20/20. Following an examination in 2010, his
optometrist noted, ``Therefore, in my medical opinion, Mr. Murphree has
sufficient vision to perform driving tasks required to operate a
commercial vehicle as he has done successfully since at least 2007 and
prior.'' Mr. Murphree reported that he has driven tractor-trailer
combinations for 50 years, accumulating 5.3 millon miles. He holds a
Class D operator's license from Alabama. His driving record for the
last 3 years shows no crashes and no convictions for moving violations
in a CMV.

Claude S. Overstreet

    Mr. Overstreet, 58, has had amblyopia in his left eye since
childhood. The best corrected visual acuity in his right eye is 20/20
and in his left eye, 20/80. Following an examination in 2010, his
optometrist noted, ``In my medical opinion, Claude Overstreet has
sufficient vision to perform the driving tasks required to operate a
commercial vehicle.'' Mr. Overstreet reported that he has driven
straight trucks for 26 years, accumulating 910,000 miles. He holds a
Class D operator's license from Alabama. His driving record for the
last 3 years shows no crashes and no convictions for moving violations
in a CMV.

James F. Partin

    Mr. Partin, 67, has no light perception in his left eye due to a
traumatic injury since childhood. The best corrected visual acuity in
his right eye is 20/20 and in his left eye, no light perception.
Following an examination in 2010, his optometrist noted, ``Mr. Partin
has sufficient vision in his right eye to operate a commercial vehicle
with no restrictions.'' Mr. Partin reported that he has driven straight
trucks for 46 years, accumulating 920,000 miles. He holds a Class A CDL
from Florida. His driving record for the last 3 years shows no crashes
and no convictions for moving violations in a CMV.

Kevin W. Van Arsdol

    Mr. Van Arsdol, 48, has congenital glaucoma in his right eye. The
best corrected visual acuity in his left eye, 20/20. Following an
examination in 2011, his optometrist noted, ``Since this condition has
been present and unchanged since birth, and considering Kevin has
safely mantained a commercial license for more than 20 years, I believe
he has sufficient vision to perform the driving tasks required to
operate a commercial vehicle''. Mr. Van Arsdol reported that he has
driven straight trucks for 1 year accumulating 140,000 miles and
tractor-trailer combinations for 26 years accumulating 2 million miles.
He holds a Class A CDL from Colorado. His driving record for the last 3
years shows no crashes but three convictions for speeding in a CMV. In
the first incident, he exceeded the speed limit by 9 MPH, in the second
incident, he exceeded the speed limit by 12 MPH and in the third
incident, he exceeded the speed limit by 5 MPH.

Harlon C. VanBlaricom

    Mr. VanBlaricom, 51, has only light perception out of his left eye
due to a traumatic injury sustained at age 5. The best corrected visual
acuity in his right eye is 20/20 and in his left eye, light perception
only. Following an examination in 2010, his optometrist noted, ``It is
my opinion that Harlon has sufficient vision needed to operate a
commercial vehicle.'' Mr. VanBlaricom reported that he has driven
tractor-trailer combinations for 30 years, accumulating 1.5 million
miles. He holds a Class A CDL from Minnesota. His driving record for
the last 3 years shows no crashes and no convictions for moving
violations in a CMV.

Request for Comments

    In accordance with 49 U.S.C. 31136(e) and 31315, FMCSA requests
public comment from all interested persons on the exemption petitions
described in this notice. The Agency will consider all comments
received before the close of business June 6, 2011. Comments will be
available for examination in the docket at the location listed under
the ADDRESSES section of this notice. The Agency will file comments
received after the comment closing date in the public docket, and will
consider them to the extent practicable. In addition to late comments,
FMCSA will also continue to file, in the public docket, relevant
information that becomes available after the comment closing date.
Interested persons should monitor the public docket for new material.

    Issued on: April 22, 2011.
Larry W. Minor,
Associate Administrator for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2011-11016 Filed 5-4-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-EX-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 76 (Monday, April 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22183-22185]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09028]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration

[U.S. DOT Docket No. NHTSA-2014-0039]

Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements

AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Request for public comment on proposed collection of
information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Before a Federal agency can collect certain information from
the public, it must receive approval from OMB. Under procedures
established by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, before seeking OMB
approval, Federal agencies must solicit public comment on proposed
collections of information, including extensions and reinstatements of
previously approved collections. This document describes a collection
of information for which NHTSA intends to seek OMB approval.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 20, 2014.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT Docket No. NHTSA-
2014-0039] by any of the following methods:
     Federal Rulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
     Mail: Docket Management Facility: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET, Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. Telephone: 1-800-647-5527.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name and
docket number for this proposed collection of information. Note that
all comments received will be posted without change to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided.
Please see the Privacy Act heading below.
    Privacy Act: Anyone is able to search the electronic form of all
comments received into any of our dockets by the name of the individual
submitting the comment (or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf
of an association, business, labor union, etc.). You may review DOT's
complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78) or you may visit http://docketsinfo.dot.gov/.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
comments received, go to http://www.regulations.gov or the street
address listed above. Follow the online instructions for accessing the
dockets.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Laurie Flaherty, Coordinator,
National 911 Program, Office of Emergency Medical Services, National
Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., NTI-140, Room W44-322,
Washington, DC 20590.<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
before an agency submits a proposed collection of information to OMB
for approval, it must publish a document in the Federal Register
providing a 60 day comment period and otherwise consult with members of
the public and affected agencies concerning each proposed collection of
information. The OMB has promulgated regulations describing what must
be included in such a document. Under OMB's regulations (at 5 CFR
1320.8(d)), an agency must ask for public comment on the following:
    (i) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
    (ii) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
    (iii) How to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
    (iv) How to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submissions of responses. In compliance with these requirements, NHTSA
asks public comment on the following proposed collection of
information:
    Title: National 911 Profile Database.
    OMB Control Number: N/A.
    FORM Number: This collection of information uses no standard forms,
but does utilize a Web-based, data reporting/collection tool (http://resourcecenter.911.gov/code/9-1-1ProfileDatabase.aspx).
    Abstract: The National 911 Resource Center is funded by the
National 911 Program, which is housed within the Office of Emergency
Medical Services at NHTSA. The National 911 Resource Center is
proposing to continue to collect and aggregate information from State
level reporting entities that can be used to measure the progress of
911 authorities across the country in enhancing their existing
operations and migrating to--digital, Internet-Protocol-based emergency
communication networks. The data will be maintained in a ``National 911
Profile Database.'' One of the objectives of the National 911 Program
is to develop, collect, and disseminate information concerning
practices, procedures, and technology used in the implementation of E-
911 services and to support 911 Public Safety Answering Points (PSAPs)
and related State and local agencies for 911 deployment and operations.
The national 911 Profile Database can be used to follow the progress of
911 authorities in enhancing their existing systems and implementing
next-generation networks for more advanced systems. The information can
also be used to identify ways in which the National 911 Program can
support State and local 911 authorities in the transition process.
    Description of the Need for the Information and Proposed Use of the
Information--The goal of the data collection process is to support a
national 911 profile that will be used to help accurately measure and
depict the current status and planned capabilities of 911 systems
across the United States. Evaluations, based upon the data collected,
will help draw attention to key roadblocks and solutions in the
deployment process and to target possible future activities and
resources consistent with the goals of the program. The information in
aggregated form will be available to State and local stakeholders in
the public safety community. The information to be collected includes
data useful to evaluating the status of 911 programs across the
country, along with their progress of implementing advanced systems and
capabilities. The data elements involved will fall within two major
categories: baseline and progress benchmarks.
     ``Baseline'' data elements reflect the current status and
nature of 911 operations from State to State. These elements are
largely descriptive in nature, are intended to provide a general view
of existing 911 services across the country, and are grouped within
three categories: administrative, system, and fiscal data.
     ``Progress benchmarks'' reflect the status of State
efforts to implement advanced, next generation 911 systems and
capabilities. As titled, these data elements are largely implementation
or deployment benchmarks against which progress can be measured. The
elements involved are grouped in a logical order of planning,
procurement, installation and testing, transition, and operations.
Planning through testing elements reflects both State level and sub-
State level activity and efforts. Transitional

and operational elements specifically represent the latter.
    In order to collect information needed to develop and implement
effective strategies that meet the Program's goal of providing
leadership, coordination, guidance and direction to the enhancement of
the Nation's 911 services, NHTSA proposes to utilize a Web-based, data
reporting and collection tool accessible through the Web site: http://resourcecenter.911.gov/code/9-1-1ProfileDatabase.aspx.
    Description of the Likely Respondents (Including Estimated Number,
and Proposed Frequency of Response to the Collection of Information):
    Under this proposed effort, the 911 Resource Center would
specifically request reporting entities to voluntarily collect and
annually report the data described above utilizing the described Web-
based data collection tool. Reporting entities are State-level 911
program officials, and the data reported will reflect State-level
aggregated data. The total number of respondents is identified at 56,
including the 50 States and the six U.S. Territories of Guam, U.S.
Minor Outlying Islands, American Samoa, Mariana Islands, U.S. Virgin
Islands, and Puerto Rico.
    The above reporting entities will be requested to annually update
data relating to their State or territory using the described Web-based
tool.
    Estimate of the Total Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden
Resulting From the Collection of Information:
    NHTSA estimates that the time required to annually report the data
described utilizing the Web-based tool will be three hours (two hours
of preparation, one hour of entry to Web site) per reporting entity,
for a total of 168 hours for all entities. The respondents would not
incur any reporting costs from the information collection beyond the
time it takes to gather the information, prepare it for reporting and
then populate the Web-based data collection tool. The respondents also
would not incur any recordkeeping burden or recordkeeping costs from
the information collection.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the Department's
performance; (b) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for the
Department to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the
information collection; and (d) ways that the burden could be minimized
without reducing the quality of the collected information. The agency
will summarize and/or include your comments in the request for OMB's
clearance of this information collection.

    Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1:48.

    Issued in Washington, DC on: April 15, 2014.
Jeffrey P. Michael,
Associate Administrator, Research and Program Development.
[FR Doc. 2014-09028 Filed 4-18-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 65 (Thursday, April 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20328-20329]
[FR Doc No: 2013-07841]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2013-N-0001]

Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs Advisory Committee;
Notice of Meeting

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    This notice announces a forthcoming meeting of a public advisory
committee of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The meeting will
be open to the public.
    Name of Committee: Peripheral and Central Nervous System Drugs
Advisory Committee.
    General Function of the Committee: To provide advice and
recommendations to the Agency on FDA's regulatory issues.
    Date and Time: The meeting will be held on May 22, 2013, from 8
a.m. to 5 p.m.
    Location: FDA White Oak Campus, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 31
Conference Center, the Great Room (rm. 1503), Silver Spring, MD 20993-
0002. Information regarding special accommodations due to a disability,
visitor parking, and transportation may be accessed at: http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm; under the heading
``Resources for You,'' click on ``Public Meetings at the FDA White Oak
Campus.'' Please note that visitors to the White Oak Campus must enter
through Building 1.
    Contact Person: Glendolynn S. Johnson, Center for Drug Evaluation
and Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave.,
Bldg. 31, rm. 2417, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>, FAX:
301-847-8533, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or FDA Advisory Committee
Information Line, 1-800-741-8138<PHONE_NUMBER> in the Washington, DC
area). A notice in the Federal Register about last minute modifications
that impact a previously announced advisory committee meeting cannot
always be published quickly enough to provide timely notice. Therefore,
you should always check the Agency's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/default.htm and scroll down to the appropriate
advisory committee meeting link, or call the advisory committee
information line to learn about possible modifications before coming to
the meeting.
    Agenda: On May 22, 2013, the committee will discuss new drug
application (NDA) 204569, for suvorexant tablets, submitted by Merck
Sharp and Dohme Corp., Worldwide Regulatory Group. The proposed
indication is for insomnia characterized by difficulties with sleep
onset and/or maintenance.
    FDA intends to make background material available to the public no
later than 2 business days before the meeting. If FDA is unable to post
the background material on its Web site prior to the meeting, the
background material will be made publicly available at the location of
the advisory committee meeting, and the background material will be
posted on FDA's Web site after the meeting. Background material is
available at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/Calendar/default.htm. Scroll down to the appropriate advisory committee meeting
link.
    Procedure: Interested persons may present data, information, or
views, orally or in writing, on issues pending before the committee.
Written submissions may be made to the contact person on or before May
8, 2013. Oral presentations from the public will be scheduled between
approximately 1 p.m. and 2 p.m. Those individuals interested in making
formal oral presentations should notify the contact person and submit a
brief statement of the general nature of the evidence or arguments they
wish to present, the names and addresses of proposed participants, and
an indication of the approximate time requested to make their
presentation on or before April 30, 2013. Time allotted for each
presentation may be limited. If the number of registrants requesting to
speak is greater than can be reasonably accommodated during the
scheduled open public hearing session, FDA may conduct a lottery to
determine the speakers for the scheduled open public hearing session.
The contact person will notify interested persons regarding their
request to speak by May 1, 2013.
    Persons attending FDA's advisory committee meetings are advised
that the Agency is not responsible for providing access to electrical
outlets.
    FDA welcomes the attendance of the public at its advisory committee
meetings and will make every effort to accommodate persons with
physical

disabilities or special needs. If you require special accommodations
due to a disability, please contact Glendolynn S. Johnson at least 7
days in advance of the meeting.
    FDA is committed to the orderly conduct of its advisory committee
meetings. Please visit our Web site at http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/AboutAdvisoryCommittees/ucm111462.htm for procedures
on public conduct during advisory committee meetings.
    Notice of this meeting is given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (5 U.S.C. app. 2).

    Dated: March 27, 2013.
Jill Hartzler Warner,
Acting Associate Commissioner for Special Medical Programs.
[FR Doc. 2013-07841 Filed 4-3-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-P


[Federal Register: March 1, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 40)]
[Notices]
[Page 10577-10579]
[DOCID:fr01mr06-125]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-53351; File No. SR-CHX-2006-06]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc.;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
and Amendment No. 1 Thereto To Incorporate Certain Examination Fees

February 22, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 8, 2006, the Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (``CHX'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the CHX. On February
17, 2006, the CHX filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule change.\3\
The CHX filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the

Act \4\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\5\ which renders the proposal
effective upon filing with the Commission. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change, as
amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange clarified the scope of the
Series 7A Examination fee in the proposed rule text and made minor
technical changes with respect to the purpose of the proposal.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The CHX proposes to amend its Participant Fees and Credits schedule
(the ``Fee Schedule'') to incorporate the fees charged by the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD'') for examinations
that certain CHX participants must successfully complete. Below is the
text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new language is in italics.
PARTICIPANT FEES AND CREDITS
* * * * *
K. Market Regulation and Market Surveillance Fees
* * * * *

                     Fees for NASD-Provided Services
                         [Paid directly to NASD]
------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuing Education Regulatory Element (Effective January 1,     $75.00
 2006)........................................................
Series 7 Examination..........................................    250.00
Series 7A Examination (includes NYSE development fee).........    250.00
Series 27 Examination.........................................     95.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
    The text of the proposed rule change, as amended, is also available
on the Exchange's Internet Web site (http://www.chx.com/ rules/proposed

--rules.htm), at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the CHX included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The CHX has prepared summaries, set forth in Sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Under the Exchange's rules, certain CHX Participants \6\ must
successfully complete the Series 7, 7A, or 27 examinations, which are
administered by the NASD. Specifically, a Participant, or a person
associated with a Participant, must successfully complete the Series 7
examination if he or she (1) accepts orders on the Exchange's trading
floor from a non-broker-dealer customer; or (2) engages in proprietary
or agency trading of equities, preferred securities, or convertible
debt securities, in a location away from the Exchange's trading floor
on behalf of a firm for which the Exchange is the Designated Examining
Authority.\7\ Similarly, a Participant must complete the Series 7A
examination if he or she accepts orders directly from a professional
customer for execution on the Exchange's trading floor.\8\ Finally, a
person who is associated with a Participant Firm that is a ``Joint Back
Office Participant'' \9\ and who is designated as a financial and
operations principal for that firm must complete the Series 27
examination.\10\ Through this filing, the Exchange proposes to
incorporate into the Exchange's Fee Schedule the fees that Exchange
Participants must pay the NASD for these examinations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ ``Participant'' means any holder of a Trading Permit. A
Participant shall be considered a ``member'' of the Exchange for
purposes of the Act. If a Participant is not a natural person, the
Participant may also be referred to as a ``Participant Firm,'' but
unless the context requires otherwise, the term Participant shall
refer to an individual Participant and/or a Participant Firm. See
CHX Article I, Rule 1(l).
    \7\ See CHX Article VI, Rule 3, Interpretation and Policy .01(d)
and .02.
    \8\ See CHX Article VI, Rule 3, Interpretation and Policy
.01(d). For purposes of this requirement, a ``professional
customer'' includes a bank, trust company, insurance company,
investment trust, a state or political subdivision thereof, a
charitable or nonprofit educational institution regulated under the
laws of the United States or any state, a pension or profit sharing
plan subject to ERISA or of any agency of the United States or of a
state or political subdivision thereof, or any person (other than a
natural person) who has, or who has under management, net tangible
assets of at least sixteen million dollars. Id.
    \9\ See CHX Article XI, Rule 3A(a) (defining requirements for
Joint Back Office Participants).
    \10\ See CHX Article VI, Rule 3, Interpretation and Policy
.01(e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act,\11\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\12\ in
particular, because it is designed to provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among members of
the Exchange. The proposal confirms that Exchange Participants must pay
the NASD for examinations that such Participants must successfully
complete under the Exchange rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The CHX has neither solicited nor received written comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change has been designated as a fee
change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \13\ and Rule
19b-4(f)(2) \14\ thereunder. Accordingly, the proposed rule change is
effective upon filing with the Commission. At any time within 60 days
of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily
abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \14\ 17 CFR 19b-4(f)(2).
    \15\ The effective date of the original proposed rule change is
February 8, 2006, and the effective date of Amendment No. 1 is
February 17, 2006. For purposes of calculating the 60-day period
within which the Commission may summarily abrogate the proposed rule
change under Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission
considers such period to commence on February 17, 2006, the date on
which the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1. See 15 U.S.C.
78s(b)(3)(C).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change, as amended, is consistent with the Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/.
 rules/sro. shtml); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File No. SR-CHX-2006-06 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File No. SR-CHX-2006-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all

written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and
copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of such
filing will also be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File No. SR-CHX-2006-06 and should be submitted on or before March 22,
2006.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-2846 Filed 2-28-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 215 (Tuesday, November 8, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67361-67363]
[FR Doc No: 2022-24308]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0817; Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00369-T;
Amendment 39-22197; AD 2022-20-13]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and A350-1041 airplanes. This AD was

prompted by a determination that in the event of rapid decompression at
a specific location of the airplane, possible deflections of the
passenger floor cross beams may result in wiring damages, leading to
potential system losses. This AD requires amending the operator's
existing airplane flight manual (AFM) to update the landing performance
database, as specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD, which is incorporated by reference. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective December 13, 2022.

ADDRESSES:
    AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-0817; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this final rule, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
address for Docket Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
    Material Incorporated by Reference:
     For the material incorporated by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany;
telephone +49 221 8999 000; email [email protected]; website
easa.europa.eu. You may find this IBR material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu.
     You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available in the AD docket at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-0817.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dan Rodina, Aerospace Engineer, Large
Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South
216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus A350-941
and A350-1041 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
July 12, 2022 (87 FR 41265). The NPRM was prompted by AD 2022-0054,
dated March 23, 2022, issued by EASA, which is the Technical Agent for
the Member States of the European Union (referred to after this as the
MCAI). The MCAI states that in the event of rapid decompression at a
specific location of the airplane, possible deflections of the
passenger floor cross beams may result in wiring damages, leading to
potential system losses.
    In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require revising the operator's
existing Airbus A350 AFM to update the landing performance database, as
specified in EASA AD 2022-0054. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
    You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2022-0817.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received comments from the Air Line Pilots Association and
three individuals, who supported the NPRM without change. One
individual did not support the NPRM but did not justify this position
or request any changes to the NPRM.

Conclusion

    This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered the
comments received, and determined that air safety requires adopting
this AD as proposed. Accordingly, the FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on this product. Except for minor editorial
changes, this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None of the
changes will increase the economic burden on any operator.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    EASA AD 2022-0054 specifies procedures for revising the operator's
existing Airbus A350 AFM to update the landing performance database.
    This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD would affect 30 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost per       Cost on U.S.
                          Labor cost                              Parts cost        product         operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85.............................              $0              $85           $2,550
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and

responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2022-20-13 Airbus SAS: Amendment 39-22197; Docket No. FAA-2022-0817;
Project Identifier MCAI-2022-00369-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective December 13,
2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Airbus SAS Model A350-941 and A350-1041
airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by a determination that, in the event of
rapid decompression at a specific location of the airplane, possible
deflections of the passenger floor crossbeams may result in wiring
damages, leading to potential system losses. The FAA is issuing this
AD to address this unsafe condition, which could lead to an increase
of the landing distance, exceeding the value provided in the current
in-flight failure data file for landing, and potentially resulting
in a runway excursion.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Requirements

    Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2022-0054, dated March 23, 2022 (EASA AD 2022-0054).

(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2022-0054

    (1) Where EASA AD 2022-0054 refers to March 30, 2022 (the
effective date of EASA AD 2022-0045, dated March 16, 2022), this AD
requires using the effective date of this AD.
    (2) Where EASA AD 2022-0054 specifies to ``inform all flight
crews, and thereafter, operate the aeroplane accordingly,'' this AD
does not require those actions as those actions are already required
by existing FAA operating regulations.
    (3) Where the ``AFM Amendment'' paragraph of EASA AD 2022-0054
specifies implementing an AFM [airplane flight manual] revision, for
this AD, replace the text ''implement the AFM revision, as defined
in this [EASA] AD'' with ``revise the operator's existing AFM to
incorporate the aircraft performance database specified in the AFM
revision, as defined in this [EASA] AD.''
    (4) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2022-0054 does not apply
to this AD.

(i) Additional AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to
the Large Aircraft Section, International Validation Branch, send it
to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (j) of this
AD. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval must include
the DOA-authorized signature.
    (3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (i)(2) of this AD, if any service information contains
procedures or tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests
that are not identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and
tests that are not identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the operator's maintenance or
inspection program without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided
the procedures and tests identified as RC can be done and the
airplane can be put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to procedures or tests identified as RC
require approval of an AMOC.

(j) Additional Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Dan Rodina,
Aerospace Engineer, Large Aircraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; email [email protected].

(k) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2022-0054,
dated March 23, 2022.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For EASA AD 2022-0054, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000; email
[email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may find this EASA
AD on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
    (4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this material that is incorporated by reference
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, email
[email protected], or go to: www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on September 22, 2022.
Christina Underwood,
Acting Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-24308 Filed 11-7-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: May 4, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 86)]
[Notices]
[Page 25303-25304]
[DOCID:fr04my07-66]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2006-0291; FRL-8128-5]

Guidance for Pesticide Registrants on Small-Scale Field Testing
and Low-Level Presence in Food of Plant-Incorporated Protectants
(PIPs); Notice of Availability

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Agency is announcing the availability of a Pesticide
Registration Notice (PR Notice) titled ``Guidance on Small-Scale Field
Testing and Low-Level Presence in Food of Plant-Incorporated
Protectants (PIPs).'' PR Notices are issued by the Office of Pesticide
Programs (OPP) to inform pesticide registrants and other interested
persons about important policies, procedures, and registration related
decisions, and serve to provide guidance to pesticide registrants and
OPP personnel. The PR Notice provides guidance to the registrant
concerning clarification on the process by which EPA reviews and
ensures the safety of low-level residues of PIPs in food or feed, and
the conditions under which a tolerance or exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance would be required for field tests for
biotechnology-derived food and feed crop plants containing PIPs.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia Moe, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460-0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    This action is directed to the public in general. Although this
action may be of particular interest to those persons who are involved
in plant breeding using PIPs including but not limited to academic
researchers, seed companies, and PIP registrants. Since other entities
may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all
the specific entities that may be affected by this action. If you have
any questions regarding the information in this notice, consult the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

II. What Guidance Does the PR Notice Provide?

    The PR Notice provides guidance to the registrant concerning the
policies described in the August 2, 2002 Federal Register (67 FR
50578)notice on ``Proposed Federal Actions to Update Field Test
Requirements for Biotechnology Derived Plants and to Establish Early
Food Safety Assessments for New Proteins Produced by Such Plants''
issued under the auspices of the Office of Science and Technology
Policy (OSTP). The OSTP notice was issued to outline what measures
federal agencies would take to prevent low levels of biotechnology
derived genes and gene products from being found in commercial food and
feed. The OSTP notice stated that EPA would rely on existing processes
and publish guidance for individuals and organizations conducting field
testing of PIPs. The PR Notice describes those existing rules along
with the existing procedures related to them. Additionally, the PR
Notice provides guidance on residue containment in small-scale field
testing and the kinds of information that EPA has received to support
the PIP tolerances issued thus far.

III. Do PR Notices Contain Binding Requirements?

    The PR Notice discussed in this notice is intended to provide
guidance to EPA personnel and decision makers and to pesticide
registrants. While the requirements in the statutes and Agency
regulations are binding on EPA and the applicants, the PR Notice is not
binding on either EPA or pesticide registrants, and EPA may depart from
the guidance where circumstances warrant and without prior notice.
Likewise, pesticide registrants may assert that the guidance is not
appropriate generally or not applicable to a specific pesticide or
situation.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests.

    Dated: April 30, 2007,
Debra Edwards,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E7-8550 Filed 5-3-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S


                      UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
                          SECTOR POLICIES AND PROGRAMS DIVISION
                       OFFICE OF AIR QUALITY PLANNING AND STANDARDS
                               OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION

April 9, 2012

MEMORANDUM

SUBJECT:	Meeting notes for the March 27, 2012 meeting with Stephen Woock of Weyerhaeuser

FROM:	Kelley Spence
		John Bradfield

TO:		Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2007-0544

This memorandum summarizes the meeting between Stephen Woock of Weyerhaeuser and the EPA on March 27, 2012.  This meeting was requested in response to the Risk and Technology Review (RTR) of the National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) for the pulp and paper industry.  The topics and discussions were substantially the same as the meeting with AF&PA on March 28[th].

Meeting Attendees:

John Bradfield, EPA
Robin Dunkins, EPA
Bill Schrock, EPA
Kelley Spence, EPA
Nick Swanson, EPA
Stephen Woock, Weyerhaeuser

Discussion Points:

   *    Schedule and updates
   *    Review of comments submitted
   *    Alternative monitoring for condensate compliance as implemented by the States
   *    NCASI survey for excess emission allowances
   *    ASB variability


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 190 (Monday, October 3, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59844-59845]
[FR Doc No: 2022-21337]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-95933; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2022-027]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on
Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 2, To Modify Certain Pricing
Limitations for Companies Listing in Connection With a Direct Listing
With a Capital Raise

September 27, 2022.
    On March 21, 2022, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule

change to allow companies to modify certain pricing limitations for
companies listing in connection with a Direct Listing with a Capital
Raise in which the company will sell shares itself in the opening
auction on the first day of trading on Nasdaq. The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the Federal Register on April 8, 2022.\3\
On May 19, 2022, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the
Commission designated a longer period within which to either approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94592 (April 4,
2022), 87 FR 20905 (April 8, 2022) (``Notice''). Comments received
on the proposal are available on the Commission's website at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-nasdaq-2022-027/srnasdaq2022027.htm.
    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94947 (May 19,
2022), 87 FR 31915 (May 25, 2022). The Commission designated July 7,
2022, as the date by which it should approve, disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On May 23, 2022, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change, which superseded the proposed rule change as originally
filed. Amendment No. 1 was published for comment in the Federal
Register on June 2, 2022.\6\ On July 7, 2022, the Commission instituted
proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act \7\ to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the proposed rule change.\8\ On
September 15, 2022, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 2 to the proposed
rule change, which superseded the original filings, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, in its entirety.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 94989 (May 26,
2022), 87 FR 33558 (June 2, 2022).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95220 (July 7,
2022), 87 FR 41780 (July 13, 2022).
    \9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 95811 (September 16,
2022), 87 FR 57951 (September 22, 2022).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \10\ provides that, after initiating
proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the
date of publication of notice of the filing of the proposed rule
change. The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order
approving or disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not
more than 60 days if the Commission determines that a longer period is
appropriate and publishes the reasons for such determination. The
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register
on April 8, 2022.\11\ The 180th day after publication of the Notice is
October 5, 2022. The Commission is extending the time period for
approving or disapproving the proposal for an additional 60 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \11\ See Notice, supra Note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the
proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 2, along with the
comments on the proposal. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\12\ designates December 4, 2022, as the
date by which the Commission should either approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change (File No. SR-NASDAQ-2022-027), as modified by
Amendment No. 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-21337 Filed 9-30-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: September 18, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 180)]
[Notices]
[Page 54695]
[DOCID:fr18se06-118]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submissions for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Filings and Information Services, Washington, DC
20549

Extensions:
    Form 18; OMB Control No. 3235-0121; SEC File No. 270-105.
    Form F-80; OMB Control No. 3235-0404; SEC File No. 270-357.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management and Budget
requests for extension of the previously approved collections of
information discussed below.
    Form 18 (17 CFR 249.218) is used for the registration of securities
of any foreign government or political subdivision on a U.S. exchange.
The information collected is intended to ensure that the information
required to be filed by the Commission permits verification of
compliance with securities law requirements and assures the public
availability of the information. The information provided is mandatory
and all information is made available to the public upon request. Form
18 takes approximately 8 hours per response and is filed by
approximately 5 respondents for a total of 40 annual burden hours. It
is estimated that 100% of the total reporting burden is prepared by the
company.
    Form F-80 (17 CFR 239.41) is used by large publicly traded Canadian
foreign private issuers registering securities offered in business
combinations and exchange offers. The information collected is intended
to ensure that the information required to be filed by the Commission
permits verification of compliance with securities law requirements and
assures the public availability of the information. The information
provided is mandatory and all information is made available to the
public upon request. Form F-80 takes approximately 2 hours per response
and is filed by 4 issuers for a total annual burden of 8 hours. The
estimated burden of 2 hours per response was based upon the amount of
time necessary to compile the registration statement using the existing
Canadian prospectus plus any additional information required by the
Commission.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Written comments regarding the above information should be directed
to the following persons: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503 or send an e-mail to
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) R. Corey Booth, Director/Chief

Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, C/O Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia, 22312; or send
an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB
within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: September 11, 2006.
Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-15453 Filed 9-15-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


11547 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 2003 / Notices new facilities. All records are to be maintained by the source for a period of at least 5 years. The POTW NESHAP also requires affected sources to submit a notification of compliance status. This notification must be signed by a responsible company official who certifies its accuracy and certifies that the source has complied with the standards. The notification of compliance status must be submitted within 180 days after the compliance date for the affected source. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and 48 CFR chapter 15, and are identified on the form and/ or instrument, if applicable. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 36 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/ Affected Entities: Publicly Owned Treatment Works ( POTW) Facilities. Estimated Number of Respondents: 6. Frequency of Response: Annually. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 216 hours. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $ 12,200. Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 175 hours in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. This increase is because of additional respondents, which increased from one to six. Some reductions in burden also occurred because responses are now on an operating year rather than initial year basis. Dated: February 27, 2003. Oscar Morales, Director, Collection Strategies Division. [ FR Doc. 03   5746 Filed 3   10   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ RCRA   2002   0030, FRL   7464   1]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission of EPA ICR No. 1773.06 ( OMB No. 2050   0171) to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act ( 44 U. S. C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that the following Information Collection Request ( ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget ( OMB) for review and approval: NESHAP for Hazardous Waste Combustors ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEE)   ( Renewal), ( OMB Control No. 2050   0171, EPA ICR No. 1773.06). The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost. DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before April 10, 2003. ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed instructions in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information, call the RCRA Call Center ( 800) 424   0346. For specific information regarding this notice, call Shiva Garg, Hazardous Waste Minimization and Management Division, Office of Solid Waste, Mail Code 5302W, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: ( 703) 308   8459; fax number: ( 703) 308   8433; e mail address: garg. shiva@ epa. gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12. On October 30, 2002 ( 67 FR 66144), EPA sought comments on this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8( d). EPA received no comments. EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID No. RCRA   2002   0030, which is available for public viewing at the RCRA Docket in the EPA Docket Center ( EPA/ DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8: 30 a. m. to 4: 30 p. m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is ( 202) 566   1742, and the telephone number for the RCRA Docket is ( 202) 566   0270. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA Dockets ( EDOCKET) at http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket. Use EDOCKET to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select `` search,'' then key in the docket ID number identified above. Any comments related to this ICR should be submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice, and according to the following detailed instructions: ( 1) Submit your comments to EPA online using EDOCKET ( our preferred method), by e mail to rcradocket epa. gov, or by mail to: EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mailcode: 5305T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and ( 2) Mail your comments to OMB at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget ( OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20503. EPA's policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made available for public viewing in EDOCKET as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EDOCKET. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Although identified as an item in the official docket, information claimed as CBI, or whose disclosure is otherwise restricted by statute, is not included in the official public docket, and will not be available for public viewing in EDOCKET. For further information about the electronic docket, see EPA's Federal Register notice describing the electronic docket at 67 FR 38102 ( May 31, 2002), or go to http:// www. epa. gov/ edocket. Title: NESHAP for Hazardous Waste Combustors ( 40 CFR part 63, subpart EEE)   ( Renewal), ( OMB Control No. 2050   0171, EPA ICR Number 1773.06).

VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 17: 02 Mar 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00029 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 11MRN1. SGM 11MRN1 11548 Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 47 / Tuesday, March 11, 2003 / Notices This is a request to renew an existing approved collection that is scheduled to expire on October 31, 2004. Under the OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. Abstract: EPA regulates the burning of hazardous waste by several source categories of hazardous waste combustors under 40 CFR part 63, parts 264 and 265 ( subpart O), and part 266 ( subpart H). On September 30, 1999, EPA promulgated ( 64 FR 52828) standards to control emissions of hazardous air pollutants from incinerators, cement kilns and lightweight aggregate kilns that burn hazardous wastes under 40 CFR part 63. The ICR # 1773.02 pertaining to the provisions of this rule was approved under OMB Control # 2050   0171. A number of parties, representing interests of both industrial sources and of the environmental community, sought judicial review of the September 30, 1999 rule. On July 24, 2001, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ( the Court) granted the Sierra Club's petition for review and vacated the challenged portions of the rule. However, the Court invited us and the parties to the proceeding to file a motion to delay issuance of its mandate to request either that the current standards remain in place or that EPA be allowed reasonable time to develop interim standards. EPA and the parties to the proceeding agreed to take several actions, and the Court concurred on them. First, we agreed to issue a one year extension to the compliance date of September 30, 2002 promulgated in the September 30, 1999 rule. On December 6, 2001 ( 66 FR 63313), we published a final rule which extended the compliance date to September 30, 2003. Second, we committed to publish an interim rule with revised emission standards and to finalize several compliance and implementation amendments to the rule. These interim standards and compliance and implementation amendments were promulgated on February 13 and 14, 2002 ( 67 FR 6792 and 67 FR 6968). The interim standards replace the vacated standards, until we finalize final replacement standards that comply with the Court's mandate. Finally, we agreed to issue the final replacement standards by June 14, 2005. EPA also issued four technical correction notices to the rule since the last ICR was approved. They were published at 65 FR 42292 ( July 10, 2000), 65 FR 67268 ( November 9, 2000), 66 FR 24270 ( May 14, 2001) and 67 FR 77687 ( December 19, 2002). This ICR revision takes into account the changes to the paperwork burden related to all the above stated changes to the September 30, 1999 rule to date, as well as to the changes in the hazardous waste combustor universe since the last ICR approval. During the settlement negotiations, we have had several meetings with all the parties affected by the rule. We collected new information about the operations of the Hazardous Waste Combustors ( HWCs) through these meetings. We also obtained newer test burn and trial burn reports from the EPA Regions and the States, which updated our earlier information on the regulated community. We then published a Federal Register notice of data availability ( NODA) for these sources at 67 FR 44452 ( July 2, 2002) inviting public comments on our updated database. In response, we received over 55 comments, many of which included detailed information about the operation of the HWCs and supplementary test reports. These comments are available for public viewing under Docket # RCRA   2002   0019 and were used in the preparation of this renewal ICR. The information collection required under this ICR is mandatory for the regulated sources, as it is essential to properly enforce the emission limitation requirements of the rule and will be used to further the proper performance of the functions of EPA. EPA may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations are listed in 40 CFR part 9. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1,271 hours per respondent per year. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/ Affected Entities: Hazardous waste incinerators, and hazardous waste burning cement and lightweight aggregate kilns. Estimated Number of Respondents: 119. Frequency of Response: On occasion. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 151,339 hours. Estimated Total Annualized Capital, Operating/ Maintenance Cost Burden: $ 3,925,726. Changes in the Estimates: There is an increase of 80,264 hours in the total estimated burden currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens. This increase is because the rule will become effective on September 30, 2003, and the regulated facilities have to upgrade their pollution control devices, install monitoring equipment, and conduct monitoring and recordkeeping activities to ensure compliance by the effective date, and subsequently thereafter.

Dated: February 26, 2003. Oscar Morales, Director, Collection Strategies Division. [ FR Doc. 03   5747 Filed 3   10   03; 8: 45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560   50   P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ FRL   7463   5]

Notice of Approval of Extension of Prevention of Significant Air Quality Deterioration ( PSD) and New Source Review ( NSR) Permit to Muht\ Hei, Inc. ( NSR 4   4   10, SD 92   02)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA). ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that on January 14, 2003 the Environmental Protection Agency issued an extension of the prevention of significant deterioration/ new source review ( PSD/ NSR) permit to the applicant named above. EPA's Extension of the PSD/ NSR permit grants approval to Muht Hei, Inc. to construct and operate a solid waste landfill on the tribal lands of the Campo Band of Mission Indians if construction is begun within 18 months. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Copies of the permit are available for public inspection upon request; please address the request to: Emmanuelle Rapicavoli ( AIR   3), U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105, ( 415) 972   3969. ENVIRONMENTAL APPEALS BOARD ( EAB) APPEAL: An appeal to the Administrator VerDate Jan< 31> 2003 17: 02 Mar 10, 2003 Jkt 200001 PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\ FR\ FM\ 11MRN1. SGM 11MRN1