[Federal Register: June 29, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 123)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 30917-30919]
[DOCID:fr29jn09-4]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2005-22039; Directorate Identifier 2005-NE-33-AD;
Amendment 39-15950; AD 2009-14-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Turbomeca S.A. Arrius 2F Turboshaft
Engines

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) for Turbomeca S.A. Arrius 2F turboshaft engines that have not
incorporated Turbomeca Modification Tf75. That AD currently requires
replacing the O-ring on the check valve piston in the lubrication unit
at repetitive intervals. This AD requires the same repetitive
replacements and would require incorporating Modification Tf75 as
terminating action to the repetitive O-ring replacements. Modification
Tf75 replaces the check valve piston with a piston design not requiring
an O-ring. This AD results from the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) and Turbomeca S.A. mandating the incorporation of Modification
Tf75. We are issuing this AD to prevent an uncommanded in-flight
shutdown of the engine, which could result in a forced autorotation
landing and damage to the helicopter.

DATES: This AD becomes effective August 3, 2009. The Director of the
Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference of certain
publications listed in the regulations as of August 3, 2009.

ADDRESSES: You can get the service information identified in this AD
from Turbomeca S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; e-mail: noria-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone 33 05 59 74 40 00, fax 33 05 59 74 45
15, or go to: http://www.turbomeca-support.com.
    The Docket Operations office is located at Docket Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-
0001.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: James Lawrence, Aerospace Engineer,
Engine Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 by
superseding AD 2005-17-17R1, Amendment 39-14940 (72 FR 6925, February
14, 2007), with a proposed AD. The proposed AD applies to Turbomeca
S.A. Arrius 2F turboshaft engines that have not incorporated Turbomeca
Modification Tf75. We published the proposed AD in the Federal Register
on January 22, 2009 (74 FR 3978). That action proposed to require
replacing the O-ring on the check valve piston in the lubrication unit
at repetitive intervals and to require incorporating Modification Tf75
as terminating action to the repetitive O-ring replacements.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. We received no comments on the proposal or on
the determination of the cost to the public.

Change to the Mandatory Terminating Action Compliance Time

    Since we issued the proposed AD, we realized that there is no
direct relationship between the mandatory terminating action compliance
date in the proposed AD and the usage rate of the affected helicopters.
We changed the AD to require the terminating action be done within 150
flight hours after the effective date of this AD.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD with the
change described previously. We have determined that this change will
neither increase the economic burden on any operator nor increase the
scope of the AD.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 94 Arrius 2F turboshaft
engines installed on helicopters of U.S. registry. We also estimate
that it will take about one work-hour per engine to perform an O-ring
replacement, and about one work-hour to incorporate Modification Tf75.
The average labor rate is $80 per work-hour. Required parts will cost
about $16 per engine for O-ring replacement, and about $20 per engine
for incorporating Modification Tf75. Based on these figures, we
estimate the total cost of the AD to U.S. operators to be $18,424.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.

    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD and
placed it in the AD Docket. You may get a copy of this summary at the
address listed under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-14940 (72 FR
6925, February 14, 2007), and by adding a new airworthiness directive,
Amendment 39-15950, to read as follows:

2009-14-01 Turbomeca S.A: Amendment 39-15950. Docket No. FAA-2005-
22039; Directorate Identifier 2005-NE-33-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective August
3, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2005-17-17R1, Amendment 39-14940.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Turbomeca S.A. Arrius 2F turboshaft
engines that have not incorporated modification Tf75. These engines
are installed on, but not limited to, Eurocopter EC120B helicopters.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from the European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) and Turbomeca S.A. mandating the incorporation of
Modification Tf75. The actions specified in this AD are intended to
prevent an uncommanded in-flight shutdown of the engine, which could
result in a forced autorotation landing and damage to the
helicopter.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified unless the
actions have already been done.

O-ring Replacement

    (f) Replace the O-ring on the check valve piston in the
lubrication unit at the intervals specified in Table 1 of this AD.
Use the Instructions to be Incorporated paragraphs 2.A. through
2.C.(2) of Turbomeca Alert Service Bulletin No. A319 79 4802, Update
No. 1, dated April 3, 2006, to replace the O-ring.

                                Table 1--Compliance Times for O-ring Replacement
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                         Then replace the O-ring by
       If the class of oil is:                 the later of:            Thereafter, replace the O-ring within:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(1) HTS or unknown...................  300 hours time-since-new       300 hours time-since-last replacement
                                        (TSN) or 50 hours after        (TSR).
                                        March 21, 2007 (effective
                                        date of AD 2005-17-17R1)..
(2) STD..............................  450 hours TSN or 50 hours      500 hours TSR.
                                        after March 21, 2007
                                        (effective date of AD 2005-
                                        17-17R1)..
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mandatory Terminating Action

    (g) Within 150 flight hours after the effective date of this AD,
do the following mandatory terminating action to the repetitive O-
ring replacements:
    (1) Incorporate Turbomeca Modification Tf75 by replacing the
check valve piston in the lubrication unit, with a check valve
piston requiring no O-ring.
    (2) Use the Instructions to be Incorporated paragraphs 2.A.
through 2.B.(1)(r) of Turbomeca Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 319
79 4075, Version B, dated May 14, 2008, to replace the check valve
piston.

Alternative Methods of Compliance

    (h) The Manager, Engine Certification Office, FAA, has the
authority to approve alternative methods of compliance for this AD
if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.

Related Information

    (i) EASA AD 2008-0170, dated September 25, 2008, also addresses
the subject of this AD.
    (j) Contact Turbomeca S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; e-mail: noria-
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone 33 05 59 74 40 00, fax 33 05 59 74
45 15, or go to: http://www.turbomeca-support.com, for a copy of the
service information identified in this AD.
    (k) Contact James Lawrence, Aerospace Engineer, Engine
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax (781) 238-
7199, for more information about this AD.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (l) You must use the service information specified in the
following Table 2 to perform the actions required by this AD. The
Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of the documents listed in the following Table 2 in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Contact Turbomeca
S.A., 40220 Tarnos, France; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
telephone 33 05 59 74 40 00, fax 33 05 59 74 45 15, or go to: http:/
/www.turbomeca-support.com, for a copy of this service information.
You may review copies at the FAA, New England Region, 12 New England
Executive Park, Burlington, MA; or at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

                                       Table 2--Incorporation by Reference
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Turbomeca Alert/Mandatory Service
             Bulletin No.                        Page                Update/version                Date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A319 79 4802, Total Pages: 7.........  ALL....................  Update No. 1...........  April 3, 2006.
319 79 4075, Total Pages: 9..........  ALL....................  Version B..............  May 14, 2008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on June 19, 2009.
Francis A. Favara,
Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-15099 Filed 6-26-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 128 (Wednesday, July 3, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 40235-40237]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15918]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-69868; File No. SR-C2-2013-023]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
Relating to Extending the AIM Pilot Program

 June 27, 2013.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on June 26, 2013, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The proposed rule change proposes to amend the Exchange's rules
related to its Automated Improvement Mechanism (``AIM''). The text of
the proposed rule change is provided below.
    (Additions are italicized; deletions are [bracketed].)
* * * * *

C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated Rules

* * * * *

Rule 6.51. Automated Improvement Mechanism (``AIM'')

    Notwithstanding the provisions of Rule 6.50, a Participant that
represents agency orders may electronically execute an order it
represents as agent (``Agency Order'') against principal interest or
against a solicited order provided it submits the Agency Order for
execution into the AIM auction (``Auction'') pursuant to this Rule.
    (a)-(b) No change.
    * * * Interpretations and Policies:
    .01-.02 No change.
    .03 Initially, and for at least a Pilot Period expiring on July 18,
2014[3], there will be no minimum size requirement for orders to be
eligible for the Auction. During this Pilot Period, the Exchange will
submit certain data, periodically as required by the Commission, to
provide supporting evidence that, among other things, there is
meaningful competition for all size orders and that there is an active
and liquid market functioning on the Exchange outside of the Auction
mechanism. Any data which is submitted to the Commission will be
provided on a confidential basis.
    .04-.09 No change.
* * * * *
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the Exchange's Office
of the Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set

forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of
such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In December 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') approved adoption of C2's rules, including the AIM
auction process.\3\ AIM exposes certain orders electronically to an
auction process to provide these orders with the opportunity to receive
an execution at an improved price. The AIM auction is available only
for orders that a Trading Permit Holder represents as agent (``Agency
Order'') and for which a second order of the same size as the Agency
Order (and on the opposite side of the market) is also submitted
(effectively stopping the Agency Order at a given price).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 61152 (December 10,
2009), 74 FR 66699 (December 16, 2009) (SR-C2-2011-015).
    \4\ The Exchange first activated AIM on October 17, 2011 for
P.M.-settled options on the S&P 500 Index (SPXpm), which are no
longer listed on the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission approved on a pilot basis the component of AIM that
there is no minimum size requirement for orders to be eligible for the
auction. In connection with the pilot program, the Exchange has
submitted to the Commission reports providing AIM auction and order
execution data, and the Exchange will continue to submit to the
Commission these reports. Three one-year extensions to the pilot
program have previously become effective.\5\ The proposed rule change
merely extends the duration of the pilot program until July 18, 2014.
Extending the pilot for an additional year will allow the Commission
more time to consider the impact of the pilot program on AIM order
executions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 63238 (November 3,
2010), 75 FR 68844 (November 9, 2010) (SR-C2-2010-008); 64929 (July
20, 2011), 76 FR 44635 (July 26, 2011) (SR-C2-2011-015); and 67303
(June 28, 2012), 77 FR 39777 (July 5, 2012) (SR-C2-2012-021).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\6\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \7\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \8\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \8\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the proposed rule change protects investors and the
public interest by allowing for an extension of the AIM pilot program,
and thus allowing additional time for the Commission to evaluate the
AIM pilot program. The AIM pilot program will continue to allow smaller
orders to receive the opportunity for price improvement pursuant to the
AIM auction.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    C2 does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not believe
the proposed rule change imposes any burden on intramarket competition
because it applies to all Trading Permit Holders. All Trading Permit
Holders that submit orders into an AIM auction are still subject to the
same requirements. In addition, the Exchange does not believe the
proposed rule change will impose any burden on intermarket competition,
as it merely extends the duration of an existing pilot program, which
is available to all market participants through Trading Permit Holders.
AIM will continue to function in the same manner as it currently
functions for an extended period of time.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \9\ and
subparagraph (f)(6) of Rule 19b-4 thereunder.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires the Exchange to give the Commission written notice of the
Exchange's intent to file the proposed rule change along with a
brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least
five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The
Commission deems this requirement to have been met.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \11\ normally
does not become operative for 30 days after the date of filing.
However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \12\ the Commission may
designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange requested
that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay. The Exchange
noted that such waiver will permit the AIM pilot program to continue
without interruption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest, as
it will allow the pilot program to continue uninterrupted, thereby
avoiding any potential investor confusion that could result from a
temporary interruption in the pilot program. Further, the Commission
notes that, because the filing was submitted for immediate
effectiveness on June 26, 2013, the fact that the current rule
provision does not expire until July 18, 2013 will afford interested
parties the opportunity to comment on the proposal before the Exchange
requires it to become operative. For this reason, the Commission
designates the proposed rule change to be operative on July 18,
2013.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ For purposes only of waiving the operative delay, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if

it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-C2-2013-023 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2013-023. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, on official
business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m., located at
100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549. Copies of such filing also will
be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-
2013-023 and should be submitted on or before July 24, 2013.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

 Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-15918 Filed 7-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 80 (Wednesday, April 28, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22442-22443]
[FR Doc No: 2021-08783]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2021-0043]

Collection of Information Under Review by Office of Management
and Budget; OMB Control Number 1625-0024

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Thirty-day notice requesting comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 the
U.S. Coast Guard is forwarding an Information Collection Request (ICR),
abstracted below, to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA), requesting an extension
of its approval for the following collection of information: 1625-0024,
Safety Approval of Cargo Containers; without change.
    Our ICR describes the information we seek to collect from the
public. Review and comments by OIRA ensure we only impose paperwork
burdens commensurate with our performance of duties.

DATES: You may submit comments to the Coast Guard and OIRA on or before
May 28, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Comments to the Coast Guard should be submitted using the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. Search for
docket number [USCG-2021-0043]. Written comments and recommendations to
OIRA for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30
days of publication of this notice to https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
    Find this particular information collection by selecting
``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using
the search function.
    A copy of the ICR is available through the docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov. Additionally, copies are available
from: Commandant (CG-6P), ATTN: Paperwork Reduction Act Manager, U.S.
Coast Guard, 2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave. SE, STOP 7710,
Washington, DC 20593-7710.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.L. Craig, Office of Privacy
Management, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or fax<PHONE_NUMBER>, for questions
on these documents.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Public Participation and Request for Comments

    This notice relies on the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended. An ICR is an application to
OIRA seeking the approval, extension, or renewal of a Coast Guard
collection of information (Collection). The ICR contains information
describing the Collection's purpose, the Collection's likely burden on
the affected public, an explanation of the necessity of the Collection,
and other important information describing the Collection. There is one
ICR for each Collection.
    The Coast Guard invites comments on whether this ICR should be
granted based on the Collection being necessary for the proper
performance of Departmental functions. In particular, the Coast Guard
would appreciate comments addressing: (1) The practical utility of the
Collection; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden of the Collection;
(3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of information
subject to the Collection; and (4) ways to minimize the burden of the
Collection on respondents, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. These comments
will help OIRA determine whether to approve the ICR referred to in this
Notice.
    We encourage you to respond to this request by submitting comments
and related materials. Comments to Coast Guard or OIRA must contain the
OMB Control Number of the ICR. They must also contain the docket number
of this request, [USCG-2021-0043], and must be received by May 28,
2021.

Submitting Comments

    We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, contact the person in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for alternate
instructions. Documents mentioned in this notice, and all public
comments, are in our online docket at https://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions. Additionally,
if you go to the online docket and sign up for email alerts, you will
be notified when comments are posted.
    We accept anonymous comments. All comments to the Coast Guard will
be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will
include any personal information you have provided. For more about
privacy and submissions to the Coast Guard in response to this
document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226,
March 11, 2020). For more about privacy and submissions to OIRA in
response to this document, see the https://www.reginfo.gov, comment-
submission web page. OIRA posts its decisions on ICRs online at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain after the comment period for each
ICR. An OMB Notice of Action on each ICR will become available via a
hyperlink in the OMB Control Number: 1625-0024.

Previous Request for Comments

    This request provides a 30-day comment period required by OIRA. The
Coast Guard published the 60-day notice (86 FR 10111, February 18,
2021) required by 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2). That notice elicited no
comments. Accordingly, no changes have been made to the Collection.

Information Collection Request

    Title: Safety Approval of Cargo Containers.
    OMB Control Number: 1625-0024.
    Summary: This information collection is associated with
requirements for owners and manufacturers of cargo containers to submit
information and keep records associated with the

approval and inspection of those containers. This information is
required to ensure compliance with the International Convention for
Safe Containers (CSC), 29 U.S.T. 3707; T.I.A.S. 9037.
    Need: This collection of information addresses the reporting and
recordkeeping requirements for containers in 49 CFR parts 450 through
453. These rules are necessary since the U.S. is signatory to the CSC.
The CSC requires all containers to be safety approved prior to being
used in trade. These rules prescribe only the minimum requirements of
the CSC.
    Forms: None.
    Respondents: Owners and manufacturers of containers, and
organizations that the Coast Guard delegates to act as an approval
authority.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Hour Burden Estimate: The estimated burden has increased from
117,271 hours to 129,345 hours a year, due to an increase in the
estimated annual number of responses.

    Authority:  The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
chapter 35, as amended.

    Dated: April 22, 2021.
Kathleen Claffie,
Chief, Office of Privacy Management, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2021-08783 Filed 4-27-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 239 (Tuesday, December 13, 2011)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 77452-77453]
[FR Doc No: 2011-31971]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Parts 121, 135 and 142

[Docket No. FAA-2011-1359]

Advisory Circular for Stall and Stick Pusher Training

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Notice of availability of proposed Advisory Circular for Stall
and Stick Pusher Training, request for comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of a proposed Advisory
Circular, regarding stall and stick pusher training for transport
category airplanes for comment. This Advisory Circular provides
guidance to training providers on stall event and stick pusher
demonstration training, including recommendations and best practices
for academic training, job performance training, and instructor
training.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 12, 2012.

ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by docket number FAA-2011-1359
using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov and follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
     Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30; U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Room
W12-140, West Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
     Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket
Operations in Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
     Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Privacy: The FAA will post all comments it receives, without
change, to http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information the commenter provides. Using the search function of the
docket Web site, anyone can find and read the electronic form of all
comments received into any FAA dockets, including the name of the
individual sending the comment (or signing the comment for an
association, business, labor union, etc.). DOT's complete Privacy Act
Statement can be found in the Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477-19478), as well as at http://DocketsInfo.dot.gov.
    Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
http://www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions
for accessing the docket or Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Burke, Air Transportation
Division, Flight Standards Service, Federal Aviation Administration,
800 Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)
267-8262; facsimile:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Background

    The primary goal of this proposed advisory circular is to provide
training, testing, and checking recommendations designed to maximize
the likelihood that pilots will respond correctly and consistently to
unexpected stall warnings, aerodynamic stalls, and/or stick pusher
activations. Additionally, the advisory circular provides guidance for
operators and training centers in the development of stall and stick
pusher event training to include stall prevention, recognition of an
approach-to-stall or actual stall, familiarity with stick pusher
systems, and the correct procedure to recover from those conditions.
Core principals of this Advisory Circular include:
     Emphasis of ``reduce angle of attack'' response as the
primary response for stall events.
     Clarification of the evaluation criteria for a recovery
from a stall or approach.
     Scenario-based training that includes realistic events
that could be encountered in operational conditions, including stalls
encountered with the autopilot engaged.
     Clarification of training to a full stall, to ensure that
pilots execute the stall recovery at the first indication of a stall.
     Stick Pusher demonstration training.
    The information within this proposed advisory circular was
developed based on a review of recommended practices developed by major
aircraft manufacturers, labor organizations, air carriers, training
organizations, simulator manufacturers, and industry representative
organizations. The FAA recognizes that the content of this draft AC
explains in further detail concepts proposed in the supplemental notice
of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM), entitled Qualification, Service, and
Use of Crewmembers and Aircraft Dispatchers, FAA Docket FAA-2008-0677,
and corresponding flightcrew member training AC, regarding stall and
stick pusher training. Following review of the comments regarding the
stall and stick pusher training proposed in the SNPRM, this advisory
circular may require additional revision. The FAA will review both the
comments received in response to this advisory circular and the SNPRM,
and revise the documents accordingly to ensure consistency and
standardization.
    The agency will consider all comments received by January 12, 2012.
Comments received after that date may be considered if consideration
will not delay agency action on the review. A copy of the advisory
circular is available for review in the assigned docket for the
advisory circular at http://www.regulations.gov.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 5, 2011.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.
[FR Doc. 2011-31971 Filed 12-12-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 136 (Monday, July 16, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 32798-32804]
[FR Doc No: 2018-15144]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 300

[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-0011; FRL-9980-64--Region 5]

National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan;
National Priorities List: Partial Deletion of the Beloit Corporation
Superfund Site

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 5 is
publishing a direct final Notice of Deletion of the Research Center
Property (RCP) of the Beloit Corporation Superfund Site (Site), in
Rockton, Illinois from the National Priorities List (NPL). This partial
deletion includes all media at the 20-acre RCP. The rest of the Site
remains on the NPL and is not affected by this action. The NPL,
promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended,
is an appendix of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan. EPA is publishing this direct final partial deletion
with the concurrence of the State of Illinois because all appropriate
response actions at the RCP under CERCLA have been completed, other
than maintenance, monitoring and five-year reviews. However, this
partial deletion does not preclude future actions under Superfund.

DATES: This direct final partial deletion is effective September 14,
2018 unless EPA receives adverse comments by August 15, 2018. If
adverse comments are received, will publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final partial deletion in the Federal Register informing the
public that the partial deletion will not take effect.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
SFUND-1990-0011, by one of the following methods: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio,
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written
comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance
on making effective comments, please visit http://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    Email: [email protected].
    Mail: Randolph Cano, NPL Deletion Coordinator, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 5 (SR-6J), 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago,
IL 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Hand deliver: Superfund Records Center, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 7th Floor South,
Chicago, IL 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Such deliveries are only accepted
during the Record Center's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information. The
normal business hours are Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-
1990-0011. The http://www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous
access'' system, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you
send an email comment directly to EPA without going through http://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket
and made available on the internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact
information in the body of your comment and with any

disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statue. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at:
    U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Superfund Records
Center, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 7th Floor South, Chicago, IL 60604,
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Hours: Monday through Friday, 8 a.m. to 4 p.m.,
excluding Federal holidays.
    Talcott Free Library, 101 East Main Street, Rockton, IL 61072,
Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>, Hours: Monday, Tuesday and Thursday, 9:00 a.m.
to 8:00 p.m., Wednesday and Friday 9:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., and Saturday
9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Randolph Cano, NPL Deletion
Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 (SR-6J), 77
West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, IL 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>, or via email
at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Partial Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Site Partial Deletion
V. Partial Deletion Action

I. Introduction

    EPA Region 5 is publishing this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion for the Beloit Corporation (Beloit Corp.) Site (Site), from
the National Priorities List (NPL). This partial deletion pertains to
the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property portion of the Site,
PIN 03-12-452-003, located at 1155 Prairie Hill Road, Rockton,
Illinois. The NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR. Part 300 which is
the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
(NCP), which EPA promulgated pursuant to Section 105 of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act
(CERCLA) of 1980, as amended. EPA maintains the NPL as the list of
sites that appear to present a significant risk to public health,
welfare, or the environment. Sites on the NPL may be the subject of
remedial actions financed by the Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund).
This partial deletion of the Beloit Corp. Site is proposed in
accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and is consistent with the Notice of
Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed on the National
Priorities List. 60 FR 55466 (Nov. 1, 1995). As described in Sec.
300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of a site deleted from the NPL
remains eligible for Fund-financed remedial action if future conditions
warrant such actions.
    Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III discusses the procedures that EPA is
using for this action. Section IV discusses the Former Beloit Corp.
Research Center Property, PIN 03-12-452-003 of the Beloit Corp.
Superfund Site and demonstrates how it meets the deletion criteria.
Section V discusses EPA's action to partially delete this portion of
the Site from the NPL unless adverse comments are received during the
public comment period.

II. NPL Deletion Criteria

    The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the State, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
    i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required,
    ii. All appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
    iii. The remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
    Pursuant to CERCLA Section 121(c) and the NCP, EPA conducts five-
year reviews to ensure the continued protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at a
site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. EPA conducts such five-year reviews even if a site is deleted
from the NPL. EPA may initiate further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new information becomes available
that indicates it is appropriate. Whenever there is a significant
release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be
restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.

III. Partial Deletion Procedures

    The following procedures apply to the deletion of the Former Beloit
Corp. Research Center Property, PIN 03-12-452-003 of the Beloit Corp.
Site:
    (1) EPA has consulted with the State of Illinois prior to
developing this direct final Notice of Partial Deletion and the Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion published in the ``Proposed Rules''
section of the Federal Register.
    (2) EPA has provided the State thirty (30) working days for review
of this action and the parallel Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion
prior to their publication today, and the State, through the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA), has concurred on the partial
deletion of the Site from the NPL.
    (3) Concurrent with the publication of this direct final Notice of
Partial Deletion, a notice of the availability of the parallel Notice
of Intent for Partial Deletion is being published in two major local
newspapers, the Rockton Herald and the Rockford Register Star. The
newspaper notices announce the 30-day public comment period concerning
the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion of the Site from the NPL.
    (4) EPA placed copies of documents supporting the partial deletion
in the deletion docket and made these items available for public
inspection and copying at the Site information repositories identified
in the ADDRESSES Section of this rule.
    (5) If adverse comments are received within the 30-day public
comment period on this partial deletion action, EPA will publish a
timely notice of withdrawal of this direct final Notice of Partial
Deletion in the Federal Register before its effective date and will
prepare a response to comments and continue with the deletion process
on the basis of the Notice of Intent for Partial Deletion and the
comments already received.
    Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not itself
create, alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not in any way alter
EPA's right to take enforcement actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of

the NCP states that the deletion of a site from the NPL does not
preclude eligibility for further response actions, should future
conditions warrant such actions.

IV. Basis for Partial Site Deletion

    The following information provides EPA's rationale for deleting the
Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property, PIN 03-12-452-003, of the
Beloit Corp. Site from the NPL:

Site Background and History

    The Beloit Corp. Site (CERCLIS ID ILD021440375) is located in
Rockton, Winnebago County, Illinois. The Site consists of one, site-
wide operable unit. The Site includes the approximately 200-acre former
Beloit Corp. property and additional adjacent areas, including the
Blackhawk Acres residential subdivision, and other industrial
properties adjacent to the subdivision, including the former Soterion/
United Recovery facility, a portion of the Taylor, Inc. property and
the Safe-T-Way property. The Site is bound on the north by Prairie Hill
Road, on the west by the Rock River, on the south by a line projected
from the Rock River along the south edge of a Village of Rockton
easement and access road to Blackhawk Boulevard, and on the east by
Blackhawk Boulevard. See Figures 1 and 2 in Maps--Beloit Corp. Site and
Area for Partial Deletion, Docket Document ID No. EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-
0011-0286 in the Docket.
    The Beloit Corp. used approximately 20 acres of its 200-acre
property for a research center (the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center
Property), and 55 acres for a manufacturing plant, a wastewater
treatment plant and lagoons, a gravel pit, and parking and outdoor
storage areas. The Beloit Corp. used about 39 acres of open field south
of its manufacturing and storage areas for foundry sand disposal and
fibrous sludge spreading. About 86 heavily wooded acres of the Beloit
Corp. property located west and south of the operations areas remain
vacant and are within a backwater and floodplain area of the Rock
River.
    The Beloit Corp. property is divided into several parcels of land
and has been redeveloped. The northern parcel of the Site is the
location of the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center, PIN 03-12-452-003,
and is the property EPA is deleting from the Site (see Property Map for
03-12-452-003 in Maps--Beloit Corp. Site and Area for Partial Deletion,
Docket Document ID EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-0011-0286 in the Docket). This
property is approximately 20.757 acres and is owned by the Rock River
Land Development Company (Rock River). The address for this property is
1155 Prairie Hill Road, Rockton, Illinois. The property is zoned for
heavy industrial use and is occupied by Andritz Paperchine, a supplier
of papermaking technology.
    The remaining western and southern parcels of the former Beloit
Corp. property are owned by Lubrizol Holding, Inc. (Lubrizol) and are
not being deleted as part of this action. These parcels include the
locations of the former Beloit Corp. manufacturing building, the former
Beloit Corp. wastewater treatment plant and lagoons, the vacant fields,
woods and floodplain areas, EPA's groundwater extraction and treatment
system cleanup remedy, and the majority of EPA's groundwater monitoring
well network (former Beloit Corp. Manufacturing Property). The PINs for
these properties are 03-13-201-002, 03-12-452-002, 03-12-376-001, 03-
13-126-001, 03-13-176-004. These parcels are also zoned for heavy
industrial use. This part of the Site is occupied by Chemtool Inc.
(Chemtool) and is used to manufacture specialized industrial
lubricants. The address for the portion of the Site remaining on the
NPL is 1165 Prairie Hill Road, Rockton, Illinois.
    The Beloit Corp. property was farmland until Beloit Corp. purchased
it in 1957. The property has been used for industrial purposes since
1957. Beloit Corp. manufactured machines at the Site that produced
layered paper products from paper pulp. Beloit Corp. used solvents at
its plant for parts cleaning operations. Beloit Corp. used petroleum-
based, non-chlorinated solvents until the mid-1970s, and chlorinated
solvents from the mid-1970s until 1983. The exact composition of the
chlorinated solvents and the amounts Beloit Corp. used are unknown.
Beloit Corp. used mineral spirits for metal degreasing and parts
cleaning from 1983 until the facility closed in 1999.
    IEPA began investigating potential contamination on the Beloit
Corp. property and in the surrounding area in the 1980s. In 1986, IEPA
sampled residential wells in the Blackhawk Acres subdivision adjacent
to the Beloit Corp. facility. Sixteen of the 55 private drinking water
wells that were sampled were contaminated.
    IEPA's investigations determined that the most likely source of the
groundwater contamination in the Blackhawk Acres subdivision was the
Beloit Corp. EPA proposed the Beloit Corp. property and the surrounding
area to the NPL as the Beloit Corp. Superfund Site on June 24, 1988 (53
FR 23988). EPA finalized listing the Beloit Corp. Site on the NPL on
August 30, 1990 (55 FR 35502).
    Beloit Corp. entered into a Consent Decree with IEPA in 1991 to
conduct a Remedial Investigation (RI) and Feasibility Study (FS) at the
Site. The RI found that the groundwater is contaminated with volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) including tetrachloroethene (PCE), 1,1,1-
tricloroethane (1,1,1-TCA), and trichloroethene (TCE).
    In 1993, IEPA determined that three residential wells in the
Blackhawk Acres subdivision contained TCE in groundwater above the
Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) established under the Safe Drinking
Water Act. IEPA subsequently fitted these three residential wells
contaminated above the MCL with carbon filtration systems plus IEPA
fitted a fourth residential well with a carbon filtration system. The
filtration systems continue to be maintained by IEPA. In 1999, IEPA
connected a fifth residence with contaminated well water to the Rockton
municipal water supply when the contamination was discovered in 1998.
    The highest area of groundwater contamination is located under the
southern area of the Erection Bay section of the Beloit Corp.
manufacturing building. The primary groundwater contaminant in this
area is PCE. The PCE contamination is believed to be due to the
discharge of VOCs to the ground surface before Beloit Corp. constructed
the Erection Bay over this area in 1989. The groundwater contamination
is in the upper aquifer and generally flows from north to south. The
groundwater contamination does not impact the Former Beloit Corp.
Research Center Property, which is upgradient of the contaminant plume
and EPA is deleting from the NPL in this action.
    IEPA issued an Action Memorandum to Beloit Corp. in 1996 to
implement an Interim Source Control Action (ISCA) at the Site. The
Action Memorandum required immediate measures to control the high
levels of VOC groundwater contamination near the Beloit Corp.
manufacturing building.
    Beloit Corp. conducted an Engineering Evaluation/Cost Analysis (EE/
CA) to evaluate potential ISCA alternatives. The non-time critical
removal action objectives developed in the EE/CA were to: Limit the
potential for the migration of VOCs in groundwater at the Site through
the installation of a groundwater containment system; initiate the
removal of VOCs from the groundwater at the source area (the vicinity
of the Erection Bay and groundwater

monitoring well W23); install and operate an appropriate treatment
system for groundwater generated by the containment system to limit
unacceptable discharges or emissions; and dispose of waste streams from
the action.
    IEPA selected a groundwater pump and treat system as the ISCA.
Beloit Corp. developed a Removal Action Design Report and constructed
the groundwater extraction and treatment system in 1996. The pump and
treat system consists of four extraction wells and an air stripper
tower adjacent to the southwest corner of the Beloit Corp.
manufacturing building on PIN 03-13-201-002. This system is currently
operated by IEPA. The treated groundwater is discharged to the Rock
River at an outfall located on Beloit Corp.'s former wastewater
treatment plant and lagoons property, PIN 03-12-452-002, under a
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
    Beloit Corp. filed for bankruptcy in 1999. As part of the
bankruptcy, the court entered an order which, among other things,
transferred the ownership of Beloit Corp.'s assets and liabilities,
including the Beloit Corp. property, to the Beloit Liquidating Trust
(the Trust). The ownership of the Beloit Corp. property then
transferred to Giuffre II, LLC (Giuffre). The United States and Giuffre
signed a settlement agreement in February 2002 under section 122(h) of
CERCLA (the section 122(h) Agreement). The State of Illinois was also a
party to the settlement agreement. The State of Illinois signed the
agreement in April 2002.
    The section 122(h) Agreement settled and resolved the potential
liability of Giuffre resulting from its ownership and/or operation of
the Beloit Corp. property. The purpose of the section 122(h) Agreement
was to facilitate the cleanup of the Site and the reuse of the
property.
    On March 18, 2003, Giuffre sold the Former Beloit Corp. Research
Center Property portion of the Site (the part of the Site being deleted
as part of this action, outside the area of groundwater contamination)
to PPC Investment Group LLC (PPC). PPC leased the property to
Paperchine. PPC sold the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property
to Rock River on January 5, 2015. Rock River continues to lease the
Property to Paperchine (now known as Andritz Paperchine).
    Giuffre deeded the remaining areas of the former Beloit Corp.
property (i.e., the Former Beloit Corp. manufacturing building, former
wastewater treatment plant and lagoons, parking and storage areas and
vacant/floodplain areas) to Rock River on January 31, 2008. Rock River
subsequently leased this property to Chemtool. Lubrizol acquired
Chemtool and purchased the remaining former Beloit Corp. property on
August 30, 2013. Lubrizol continues to operate at the Site as Chemtool.
    This partial deletion pertains to all media at the approximately
20.757-acre Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property portion of the
Beloit Corp. Site, PIN 03-12-452-003, located at 1155 Prairie Hill
Road, Rockton, Illinois (see Property Map for 03-12-452-003 in Maps--
Beloit Corp. Site and Area for Partial Deletion, Docket Document ID
EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-0011-0286 in the Docket).

Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS)

    Beloit Corp. conducted the RI in four phases between 1992 and 1998.
The Phase I and II investigations identified and investigated the
source area(s) of the VOCs at the Site. The Phase III investigation
determined the extent of the VOC groundwater contamination. The Phase
IV investigation evaluated potential sources of a deeper TCE
contaminant plume in the upper aquifer in wells in the southern portion
of the Beloit property, the southern Blackhawk Acres subdivision and in
the Village of Rockton. The Phase IV investigation also evaluated
whether VOCs detected at a home in the Blackhawk Acres subdivision were
migrating from an upgradient source area, and determined what effect
the ISCA pump and treat system was having on groundwater in the
southern portion of the Blackhawk Acres subdivision.
    The RI investigated the former Beloit Corp. foundry sand disposal
area, former on-Site wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) lagoons, fibrous
sludge spreading area where sludge from WWTP lagoons was applied,
storage yard area, Erection Bay, chip pad, former dry well, welding
area, loading dock, paint room, a nearby gravel pit, the Blackhawk
Acres subdivision, the Rock River and the wetlands west of the Beloit
Corp. operations areas, Rockton Excavating's property, the Village of
Rockton, and the Soterion property.
    The RI determined that the primary groundwater contamination at the
Site originates under the southern area of the Erection Bay section of
the Beloit Corp. manufacturing building. This area is located on PIN
03-13-201-002 within the Former Beloit Corp. Manufacturing Property,
not the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property. The groundwater
contamination is located in the shallow zone of the upper aquifer, from
the water table, which is about 20 feet below ground surface (ft-bgs),
to a depth of approximately 60 ft-bgs. The groundwater contamination
flows generally from north to south, off-Site and away from the Former
Beloit Corp. Research Center Property.
    The groundwater contamination is believed to be due to the
discharge of VOCs to the ground surface in this area before Beloit
Corp. constructed the Erection Bay over this location in 1989. Soil and
soil gas sampling in this area during the RI and during an additional
Source Area Investigation in 2007, however, could not find any
significant residual levels of VOCs in any unsaturated soil at the
Site, including below the floor of the Erection Bay building.
    The RI found a plume of deeper groundwater contamination at the
Site in the upper aquifer near the southeast corner of the Former
Beloit Corp. Manufacturing Property. This groundwater contamination
also flows off-Site, towards Rockton and the Rock River. This
groundwater contamination is also downgradient of, and flows away from
the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property.
    The groundwater in the deeper plume is contaminated primarily with
TCE and is found at a depth of approximately 70 ft-bgs. The source of
the deeper, TCE Plume could not be located, but is believed to be in
the vicinity of groundwater monitoring wells W26C and W18, near the
southeast corner of the Former Beloit Corp. Manufacturing Property and
the northwest corner of the Soterion facility. Extensive sampling of
the soils and groundwater in these areas did not indicate the presence
of residual TCE in the soils. The groundwater data however, provides
evidence that a historical release of TCE occurred in this area, even
though the source has since dissipated.
    The only structure on the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center
Property (the part of the Site that is being deleted) that was operated
by Beloit Corp. was its research center. Beloit Corp. built the
research center in 1960 and used the building to design and demonstrate
its papermaking machines.
    Beloit Corp. conducted a Feasibility Study (FS) to evaluate cleanup
alternatives to address the groundwater contamination at the Site. The
FS did not develop cleanup alternatives to address other Site media
because the baseline risk assessment did not identify any unacceptable
risks associated with exposure to the other media including surface and
subsurface soil, dust, vapor, surface water or sediment.

Selected Remedy

    EPA's and IEPA's remedial action objectives for the Site are to:
Prevent exposure to contaminated groundwater; prevent or minimize
further migration of the contaminated groundwater plumes located at and
downgradient of the Beloit Corp. manufacturing building; and to
remediate the contaminated groundwater to the more stringent of either
the MCLs or applicable State of Illinois Groundwater Quality Standards
(35 IAC Part 620), including 35 IAC Part 620.410 Class I Groundwater
Quality Standards for Class I Potable Resource Groundwater, or 35 IAC
Part 620.450 Alterative Groundwater Quality Standards.
    The only remedial alternative EPA and IEPA considered for the
Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property was institutional controls
(ICs). EPA and IEPA did not evaluate an active groundwater remedy for
the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property because the RI
determined that the groundwater in this area of the Site was not
contaminated.
    EPA and IEPA issued a Record of Decision (ROD) for the Site in
2004. The ROD selected a cleanup remedy for the Site which included:
Continued operation and monitoring of the groundwater pump and treat
ISCA system located on the Former Beloit Corp. Manufacturing Property;
VOC source area treatment on the Former Beloit Corp. Manufacturing
Property by in-situ chemical oxidation; monitored natural attenuation
to address the off-property and off-Site groundwater contamination; and
ICs.
    The only remedy component applicable to the Former Beloit Corp.
Research Center Property in the ROD is the ICs. The ICs would be in the
form of a restrictive covenant and would prohibit the use of shallow
groundwater on the Beloit Corp. property (i.e., the Former Beloit Corp.
Manufacturing Property and the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center
Property) for potable purposes until the drinking water standards in
the groundwater are attained. The ROD specifies that the current
facilities at the Beloit Corp. property use groundwater from a lower
groundwater aquifer that is not affected by the VOC contamination, and
that this deeper groundwater can continue to be used.
    IEPA conducted additional investigations in the former
manufacturing plant source area of the Site in 2006 for the remedial
design. IEPA's investigations indicated that the source area of the
groundwater contamination is larger than previously indicated (but not
on the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property), and that the
aquifer material is not conducive to in-situ chemical treatment.
    EPA and IEPA issued an Explanation of Significant Differences (ESD)
in 2007 modifying the Site remedy. The ESD changed the treatment
component of the remedy from in-situ chemical oxidation to installing
one or more additional extraction wells south and southeast of the
Erection Bay on the Former Beloit Corp. Manufacturing Property. The new
extraction wells would capture additional groundwater contamination.
The groundwater from the additional wells would be conveyed to the
existing ISCA air-stripper for treatment and discharged to the Rock
River under the NPDES permit. The ESD also included pneumatic
fracturing at the additional extraction well locations to loosen up the
soil to increase the effectiveness of the new wells.
    The ESD did not alter the conclusion that the southern area of the
Erection Bay in the manufacturing plant area of the Former Beloit Corp.
Manufacturing Property is the primary source of the groundwater
contamination at the Site. The ESD did not change the IC component for
the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property or require any
additional remedial action for the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center
Property.
    The ROD as modified by the ESD, requires: (1) The continued
operation of the existing groundwater pump and treat ISCA system at the
source area on the Former Beloit Corp. Manufacturing Property (not on
the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property); (2) installing
additional extraction wells in the source area on the Former Beloit
Corp. Manufacturing Property (not on the Former Beloit Corp. Research
Center Property); (3) groundwater monitoring; (4) operating and
maintaining (O&M) the ISCA pump and treat system on the Former Beloit
Manufacturing Property (not on the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center
Property), and (5) implementing ICs to prohibit the withdrawal of the
shallow groundwater for potable use.

Response Actions

    IEPA completed the remedial action to expand and increase the
effectiveness of the 1996 groundwater pump and treat system on the
Former Beloit Manufacturing Property in 2008. IEPA expanded the
groundwater pump and treat building to accommodate the increase in the
volume of extracted groundwater, installed three new groundwater
extraction wells, and shut down one extraction well (EW01) to adjust
the zone of groundwater extraction to better target the source area.
    IEPA conducted pneumatic fracturing at the three additional
extraction well locations to increase the volume of water pumped out by
the extraction wells in the source area. IEPA connected the new
extraction wells to the groundwater treatment system and tested the
system to ensure it was properly operating. EPA documented the
completion of the remedial action construction activities in a
September 29, 2008 PCOR (Docket Document ID EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-0011-
0260).

Cleanup Levels

    The cleanup levels for the groundwater contaminants at the Beloit
Corp. Site are federal MCLs and/or Illinois Class I standards,
whichever are more stringent. The RI determined that the groundwater
below the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property is upgradient
of, and is not affected, by the groundwater contamination at the Site,
and that the groundwater below the Research Center Property already
meets the cleanup levels for the Site.
    IEPA conducted an updated hydraulic capture zone analysis of the
expanded groundwater extraction system in 2013. The updated capture
zone analysis further confirms that the VOC-contaminated groundwater
originating from the former Erection Bay source area is being captured
and treated by the expanded ISCA pump and treat system, and is not
affecting the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property. The results
of the capture zone analysis are provided in the Task 1 Follow-Up
Activities to the Five-Year Review Report, June 2014 (Docket Document
ID EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-0011-0269).
    Annual VOC sampling of a deep, water supply well located on the
Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property (well WW441K) also
confirms that the groundwater in the lower aquifer below the Former
Beloit Corp. Research Center Property has not been affected by Site
contamination. Well WW441K is located in the lower aquifer, which is
separated from the upper aquifer by approximately 40 feet of silty
clay. The well is screened from 175 to 185 ft-bgs and from 225 to 235
ft-bgs, and is approximately 100 feet deeper than the deepest
contamination detected at the Site.
    Well WW441K is used to supply water for employee toilets and sink
uses, and for limited cleaning purposes. The Illinois Department of
Public Health requires the well to be sampled annually for VOCs and for
other contaminants as scheduled (Water

System ID IL3121418). The VOC analytical results for 2012 through 2017
for WW441K show no detected VOCs. The 2013 analyses of pesticides,
herbicides, semi-volatile organic compounds and metals show no
detectable organics and metals concentrations below drinking water
standards in the water.
    A second, deeper water supply well is located on the Former Beloit
Corp. Research Center Property (WW441L). Well WW441L is an open
borehole well from 330 ft-bgs to 554 ft-bgs and is maintained as a
backup well for fire protection. Based on other Site information and
data, well WW441L is also not expected to be impacted by Site-related
contamination. Additional information about wells WW441K and WW441L is
provided in the Technical Memorandum: Paperchine Investment Group LLC
Water Supply Wells at Beloit Corp. NPL Site, June 2017, Docket Document
ID EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-0011-0284.

Operation and Maintenance (O&M)

    The only O&M required for the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center
Property is to maintain and monitor upgradient groundwater monitoring
wells on the property as needed, and to maintain, monitor and enforce
the ROD-required IC.
    PPC filed a Uniform Environmental Covenant, pursuant to the
Illinois Uniform Environmental Covenants Act [UECA, 765 Illinois
Compiled Statutes (ILCS) 122] on the Former Beloit Corp. Research
Center Property, PIN 03-12-452-003, with the Winnebago County
Recorder's Office on February 7, 2013, Instrument<PHONE_NUMBER>2. A copy
of the recorded Environmental Covenant (EC) is in Docket Document ID
EPA-HQ-SFUND-1990-0011-0276 in the Docket.
    PPC's EC: (1) Restricts or limits the use of the land to industrial
land use; (2) prohibits the construction of new or non-existing wells
or consumptive use of the groundwater underlying the property; (3)
prohibits any activity that may interfere with or would affect the
integrity or the configuration of the RA at the Site, or the operation
and maintenance of any RA component; and (4) grants authorized
representatives of IEPA and EPA the right to enter and have continued
access to the Site at reasonable times to perform the RA. The covenant
``runs with the land'' and remains in effect until the contaminated
groundwater at the Site is restored to the more stringent of either the
federal MCLs or State of Illinois Class I groundwater standards for all
contaminants of concern. Similar ICs will be placed on the Former
Beloit Corp. Manufacturing Property. IEPA is also in the process of
establishing a Groundwater Management Zone to prevent the use of
contaminated groundwater in other Site areas beyond the former Beloit
Corp. property.
    Other O&M at the Site includes IEPA's operation of the groundwater
treatment system on the Former Beloit Corp. Manufacturing Property and
semi-annual groundwater monitoring at 21 groundwater monitoring
locations. Eight of the groundwater monitoring locations have nested
wells screened at different elevations within the aquifer to monitor
the groundwater at different depths. IEPA's groundwater monitoring
indicates that the contaminant plume has stabilized and that the
contaminated groundwater is not moving off-Site. IEPA samples nearby
residential wells every two years to ensure that the groundwater
containment system continues to be protective. The concentrations of
contaminants in private residential wells have been below MCLs since
2001.

Five-Year Review

    EPA and IEPA conducted the first statutory five-year review (FYR)
at the Beloit Corp. Site under Section 121(c) of CERCLA on September
27, 2013. A FYR evaluates whether the remedial action at a site remains
protective of human health and the environment at sites where
contaminants remain on-site at levels that do not allow for unlimited
use and unrestricted exposure.
    The FYR Report determined that a protectiveness determination could
not be made at the Site without further information to assess the
potential for vapor intrusion into nearby residences and commercial
properties, and updated groundwater modeling. The issues and
recommendations in the FYR Report did not apply to the Former Beloit
Corp. Research Center Property, which is upgradient from the source
area of the groundwater contamination at the Site and is not subject to
vapor intrusion concerns.
    IEPA conducted a vapor intrusion assessment and updated the Site
groundwater model to address the issues in the FYR Report. The vapor
intrusion assessment determined that the Site does not pose a risk to
Site workers or nearby residents through the vapor intrusion pathway.
The updated Site groundwater model capture zone analysis demonstrates
that the groundwater contamination in the Former Beloit Corp.
Manufacturing Property source area of the Site is being captured and
treated by the expanded groundwater pump and treat system required by
the 2007 ESD.
    EPA issued a FYR Addendum documenting that the Site is currently
protective of human health and the environment on January 25, 2018. The
FYR Addendum also determined that in order for the Site to be
protective over the long-term an EC must be implemented on the Former
Beloit Corp. Manufacturing Property, a GMZ must be implemented in Site
areas beyond the Former Beloit Corp. property, and an institutional
controls action plan and long-term stewardship plan for monitoring and
maintaining ICs need to be implemented. The next FYR is scheduled to be
completed by September 27, 2018.

Community Involvement

    EPA and IEPA satisfied public participation activities for the Site
required in CERCLA Section 113(k), 42 U.S.C. 9613(k), and CERCLA
Section 117, 42 U.S.C. 9617. IEPA has actively engaged the Rockton
community about the Beloit Corp. Superfund Site since the 1980s. IEPA
held public meetings and availability sessions about the Site
throughout the RI/FS at the Talcott Free Library and the Hononegah High
School. These forums allowed citizens, local officials and the media to
learn about the Site, ask questions and express their concerns directly
to IEPA community involvement and technical staff. IEPA announced all
meetings and availability sessions to the public in local newspaper
advertisements and IEPA fact sheets prior to the meetings.
    IEPA developed and distributed four fact sheets about the Site
throughout the RI/FS. The fact sheets provided information about the
residential well sampling, the environmental investigations, Site
updates, public meeting announcements, the proposed plan, new documents
and reports added to the information repository, the start and
completion of cleanup actions, schedule delays and the establishment of
the Administrative Record.
    IEPA published three weekly notices about its proposed cleanup plan
for the Site in the Rockton Herald in 2004 prior to issuing the ROD.
The notices included information about the 30-day public comment period
and the public meeting. IEPA mailed a proposed plan fact sheet
summarizing the proposed cleanup plan and the other cleanup
alternatives that were considered, to citizens, the media, and local
officials prior to selecting a final cleanup plan in the 2004 ROD. The
fact sheet also announced and included information about the public
comment period and the public meeting. IEPA extended the public comment
period for the proposed plan period by 30 days in response to

a citizen request. IEPA responded to 26 questions and comments about
the Site and the proposed cleanup plan in a responsiveness summary that
is attached to the ROD.
    IEPA published a notice announcing the 2013 FYR and inviting the
public to comment and express their concerns about the Site at the
start of the FYR. IEPA published these notices in the Rockton Herald
and the Rockford Register Star.
    EPA published notices announcing this proposed Direct Final Partial
Deletion in the Rockton Herald and the Rockford Register Star prior to
publishing this deletion in the Federal Register. Documents in the
deletion docket which EPA relied on to support this partial deletion of
the Site from the NPL are available to the public in the information
repositories and at http://www.regulations.gov.

Determination That the Criteria for Deletion Have Been Met

    The Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property portion of the
Beloit Corp. Site, PIN 03-12-452-003, meets all of the site deletion
requirements specified in Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
(OSWER) Directive 9320.22, Close-Out Procedures for National Priorities
List Sites. All cleanup actions for this property required by the 2004
ROD and 2007 ESD (i.e., the IC) have been implemented. The RI
determined that the groundwater below the Former Beloit Corp. Research
Center Property is upgradient of, and is not affected, by the
groundwater contamination at the Site, and that the groundwater below
the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property already meets cleanup
levels. IEPA's updated capture zone analysis in 2013, and sampling at
the deep, water supply well in the lower aquifer on the property
required by the Illinois Department of Public Health, provide
additional confirmation that the groundwater below the Former Beloit
Corp. Research Center Property is not contaminated and that this
portion of the Site does not pose a threat to human health or the
environment. Therefore, EPA has determined that no further Superfund
response is necessary to protect human health or the environment at the
Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property.
    The NCP (40 CFR 300.425(e)) states that a Superfund site or a
portion of a site may be deleted from the NPL when no further response
action is appropriate. EPA, in consultation with the State of Illinois,
has determined that all required response actions have been implemented
at the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property portion of the
Beloit Corp. Site, PIN 03-12-452-003, and that no further response
action by the responsible parties is appropriate on this property.

V. Partial Deletion Action

    EPA, with concurrence of the State of Illinois through the IEPA,
has determined that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA at
the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property, PIN 03-12-452-003,
other than maintenance and monitoring of groundwater monitoring wells
and ICs, and five-year reviews, have been completed. Therefore, EPA is
deleting the Former Beloit Corp. Research Center Property, PIN 03-12-
452-003, of the Beloit Corp. Site from the NPL.
    Because EPA considers this action to be noncontroversial and
routine, EPA is taking it without prior publication. This action will
be effective September 14, 2018 unless EPA receives adverse comments by
August 15, 2018. If adverse comments are received within the 30-day
public comment period, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of this
direct final Notice of Partial Deletion before the effective date of
the partial deletion and it will not take effect. EPA will prepare a
response to comments and continue with the deletion process on the
basis of the Notice of Intent to Partially Delete and the comments
already received. There will be no additional opportunity to comment.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Superfund,
Water pollution control, Water supply.

    Dated: June 25, 2018.
Cathy Stepp,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    For the reasons set out in this document, 40 CFR part 300 is
amended as follows:

PART 300--NATIONAL OIL AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES POLLUTION
CONTINGENCY PLAN

0
1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 1321(d); 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O. 13626,
77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757, 3
CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp.,
p. 193.

Appendix B to Part 300--[Amended]

0
2. Table 1 of appendix B to part 300 is amended by revising the listing
under Illinois for ``Beloit Corp.'' to read as follows:

Appendix B to Part 300--National Priorities List

                                       Table 1--General Superfund Section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                  State                            Site name                  City/county            Notes (a)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
IL......................................  Beloit Corp...............  Rockton...................               P

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (a) * * *
* * * * *
    P = Sites with partial deletion(s).
* * * * *

[FR Doc. 2018-15144 Filed 7-13-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P