[Federal Register: August 16, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 158)]
[Notices]
[Page 46052]
[DOCID:fr16au07-75]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ID-4371-001]

Heyeck, Michael; Notice of Filing

August 9, 2007.
    Take notice that on July 27, 2007, pursuant to section 305(b) of
the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 825(b), and Part 45 of the Regulations
of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 18 CFR Part 45 (2007),
Michael Heyeck filed an application for authority to hold interlocking
positions.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on August 24, 2007.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-16037 Filed 8-15-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Documentation for 2002-2018 SO2 Inventories

The 2002-2018 SO2 Inventories are three (four?) distinct inventories
representing snapshots of Maine DEP’s point source inventory and
projected emissions based on anticipated controls of sulfur in residual
(and distillate?) fuel oil.  Process unit specific records can be found
on the accompanying spreadsheet, 2002-2018_SO2_Point_Inventory.xls.
Sections of that spreadsheet are referenced below.

1.  2002 MANE-VU Point Source Inventory

As its baseline, Maine DEP is using the MANE-VU 2002 Emissions
Inventory, version 3, which can be found at   HYPERLINK
"http://www.marama.org/visibility/Inventory%20Summary/2002EmissionsInven
tory.htm"
http://www.marama.org/visibility/Inventory%20Summary/2002EmissionsInvent
ory.htm .  Maine DEP participated through NESCAUM in the development of
this inventory, designed specifically for regional haze modeling.  All
annual, point source records for SO2 were extracted and can be found in
Section 2:  2002 MANE-VU (Ver. 3) SO2 Inventory (Columns D-J).

Total SO2 Emissions: 23,711 tons

2.  2018 SO2 Inventory based on 2008 Maine DEP Point Source Inventory

The second inventory presented is the first of two project 2018
inventories based on Maine’s 2008 Point Source Inventory.  Records
were matched at the process unit level to the 2002 MANE-VU Inventory.
The following additional additions, deletions and assumptions were made:

Maine DEP has removed SO2 emissions for all facilities which ceased
operation and/or surrendered their air emissions license from 2001
through 2009.  In all, emissions from 25 facilities were deleted from
the inventory.

Thirty-two (32) facilities included in the 2002 MANE-VU Inventory have
undergone air emission license renewals or amendments and are no longer
subject to point source emissions inventory reporting under 06-096 CMR
Chapter 137.  In theory, SO2 emissions from these facilities would be
counted from this point forward in the aggregate nonpoint emissions
inventory, however, as we have chosen not to revise the nonpoint
inventory for this project, these emissions are being retained in the
point source inventory and carried forward to 2008 (and 2018) using a
conservative growth factor of 1.

Two other facilities which had temporarily ceased operation in 2008 had
their emissions carried forward from the 2002 MANE-VU Inventory as well,
using a growth factor of 1.

For all reported point source emissions in 2008, 2018 emissions are
assumed using a growth factor of 1.

See Section 3:  2008 MEDEP Point Source Inventory, projected to 2018,
using GF=1, minus facility closures, 2001-2009 for facility-specific
details.

Total SO2 Emissions: 13,194 tons

3.  2018 SO2 Inventory, assuming 0.5% Sulfur in Residual Oil

The third inventory presented builds upon the second, with the
additional assumption that the State of Maine adopts a 0.5% sulfur limit
for residual oil/Bunker C.  Residual oil use was identified at the
process level by Source Classification Code (see spreadsheet tab, SCCs).
 The following steps were used to calculate this inventory:

Based upon the total emissions, annual throughput, percent sulfur,
emission factor and control efficiency reported in 2008, a side
calculation was done to determine that the following emissions
calculation formula was used.

[Total Emissions] = [Annual Throughput] * [Percent Sulfur] * [Emissions
Factor] *

                                (1-[Control Efficiency%]) / 2000

If a facility did not report an emissions factor or did not follow the
formula above, such as emissions reported from a CEMS device or some
other manual calculation, an emissions factor was derived using the
above equation, based upon the actual reported sulfur content of the
fuel.

The percent sulfur was then changed from its actual reported value to
the assumed value of 0.5% and emissions were re-calculated using the
formula in Step a.

Records marked in red on the accompanying spreadsheet under Section 4:
2008 MEDEP Point Source Inventory, projected to 2018, using GF=1, minus
facility closures, 2001-2009, assuming 0.5% sulfur for all residual oil
burned, depict those calculations.

Total SO2 Emissions: 8,445 tons


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 19, 2011)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21807-21808]
[FR Doc No: 2011-9295]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2010-0995; FRL-9296-9]

Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of
Nevada; PM-10; Determinations Regarding Attainment for the Truckee
Meadows Nonattainment Area and Applicability of Certain Clean Air Act
Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing two determinations regarding attainment for
the Truckee Meadows PM-10 nonattainment area in Washoe County, Nevada
(``Truckee Meadows area''). First, EPA is finalizing its determination
that, based on complete and quality-assured air monitoring data for
1999-2001, the Truckee Meadows area did not attain the 24-hour National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (``NAAQS'') for particulate matter with an
aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 10 micrometers
(``PM-10'') by the applicable attainment date of December 31, 2001.
Second, EPA is finalizing its determination that the Truckee Meadows
area is currently attaining the PM-10 NAAQS, based upon complete,
quality-assured PM-10 air quality monitoring data during the years
2007-2009. Preliminary data through June 2010 contained in EPA's Air
Quality System (``AQS'') are also consistent with continued attainment
of the 24-hour PM-10 NAAQS. Because the Truckee Meadows area is
currently attaining the PM-10 NAAQS, EPA is also finalizing its
determination that the obligation to make submissions to meet certain
Clean Air Act (``CAA'' or ``the Act'') requirements related to
attainment is not applicable for as long as the area continues to
attain the PM-10 NAAQS.

DATES: This final rule is effective on May 19, 2011.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under EPA-R09-
OAR-2010-0995. Generally, documents in the docket for this action are
available electronically at http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While
all documents in the docket are listed at http://www.regulations.gov,
some information may be publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material, large maps, multi-volume reports)
and some may not be available in either location (e.g., confidential
business information (CBI)). To inspect the hard copy materials, please
schedule an appointment during normal business hours with the contact
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karina O'Connor, Air Planning Office
(AIR-2), U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco,
California 94105-3901, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-
mail address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, the terms ``we,''
``us,'' and ``our'' refer to EPA. This supplementary information is
organized as follows:

I. Summary of the Proposed Actions

    On February 28, 2011, EPA proposed to determine, under sections
179(c)(1) and 188(b)(2) of the Act, that the Truckee Meadows area
failed to attain the 24-hour PM-10 NAAQS by the applicable attainment
date of December 31, 2001 (76 FR 10817). In that same action, EPA also
proposed to determine

that the Truckee Meadows area is currently attaining the PM-10 NAAQS.
These two determinations regarding attainment were based upon complete
and quality-assured data for the 1999-2001 and 2007-2009 periods
gathered at established state and local air monitoring stations
(``SLAMS'') in the nonattainment area and entered into the EPA AQS
database. In addition, EPA found that preliminary data showed no
exceedances of the 24-hour PM-10 NAAQS in the Truckee Meadows area
during 2010. Id.
    In conjunction with and based upon our proposed determination that
the Truckee Meadows area is currently attaining the PM-10 NAAQS, we
proposed under EPA's Clean Data Policy to determine that the obligation
to submit certain CAA requirements is not applicable for as long as the
Truckee Meadows area continues to attain the PM-10 NAAQS. Specifically,
we proposed that the State's obligation to submit the following CAA
requirements would be suspended if EPA finalized its rulemaking: The
part D, subpart 4 obligations to provide an attainment demonstration
pursuant to section 189(a)(1)(B), the reasonably available control
measure (``RACM'') provisions of 189(a)(1)(C), the reasonable further
progress (``RFP'') provisions established by section 189(c), the
requirement for 189(d) plans, the attainment demonstration, RACM, RFP
and contingency measure provisions of part D, subpart 1 contained in
section 172 of the Act, and the requirement for additional plan
revisions in section 179(d) of the Act.
    For a more detailed discussion of our proposed actions, including
background topics such as development of the PM-10 NAAQS, the
designation, classification and air quality planning history for the
Truckee Meadows area, our Clean Data Policy, and our general
requirements for making attainment determinations, please refer to our
proposed rule.

II. EPA's Response to Comments

    Our February 28, 2011 proposed rule provided for a 30-day comment
period. We did not receive any public comments in response to the
proposed rule.

III. Final Actions

    Pursuant to CAA sections 188(b)(2) and 179(c)(1) and based on
complete, quality-assured data for the 1999-2001 period meeting the
requirements of 40 CFR part 50, appendix K, we have determined that the
Truckee Meadows nonattainment area failed to attain the 24-hour PM-10
NAAQS by the applicable attainment date of December 31, 2001. Failure
by a ``serious'' nonattainment area such as Truckee Meadows to attain
the PM-10 NAAQS by the applicable attainment date triggers a
requirement for the State to submit additional plan revisions providing
for attainment under CAA sections 189(d) and 179(d).
    Separately and independently of the determination above, we have
also determined, based on the most recent three years of complete,
quality-assured data meeting the requirements of 40 CFR part 50,
appendix K, that the Truckee Meadows area is currently attaining the
24-hour PM-10 NAAQS. Preliminary data for 2010 available in the AQS
database are also consistent with continued attainment of the 24-hour
PM-10 NAAQS. In conjunction with and based upon our determination that
Truckee Meadows is currently attaining the standard, EPA has determined
that the obligation to submit the following CAA requirements is not
applicable for so long as the area continues to attain the PM-10
standard: The part D, subpart 4 obligations to provide an attainment
demonstration pursuant to section 189(a)(1)(B), the RACM provisions of
section 189(a)(1)(C), the RFP provisions of section 189(c), the
requirement for 189(d) plans, the attainment demonstration, RACM, RFP
and contingency measure provisions of part D, subpart 1 contained in
section 172 of the Act, and the requirement for additional plan
revisions in section 179(d) of the Act.
    This final action does not constitute a redesignation to attainment
under CAA section 107(d)(3) because we have neither approved a
maintenance plan as required under section 175A of the CAA nor
determined that the area has met the other CAA requirements for
redesignation. The classification and designation status in 40 CFR part
81 remain serious nonattainment for this area until such time as EPA
determines that Nevada meets the CAA requirements for redesignation of
the Truckee Meadows area to attainment. Subsequently, if we determine
after notice and comment rulemaking in the Federal Register that the
Truckee Meadows area has violated the 24-hour PM-10 standard (prior to
a redesignation to attainment), these requirements would once again
become applicable.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    This final action makes two determinations of attainment based on
air quality, results in the suspension of certain Federal requirements,
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For these reasons, this action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, this rule does not have tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the CAA obligations discussed herein do not apply to Indian
tribes and thus will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: April 9, 2011.
Jared Blumenfeld,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2011-9295 Filed 4-18-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17176-17178]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7231]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64111; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2011-10)

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change Amending Its Option
Trading Rules To Extend the Operation of Its Pilot Program Regarding
Minimum Value Sizes for Flexible Exchange Options

March 23, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on March 11, 2011, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``NYSE Arca'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of the
Substance of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes [sic] its option trading rules to extend the
operation of its pilot program (``Pilot Program'') regarding minimum
value sizes for flexible exchange options (``FLEX Options''), currently
scheduled to expire on March 28, 2011, until March 30, 2012. The text
of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's Web site at
http://www.nyse.com, on the Commission's Web site at http://www.sec.gov, at the Exchange's principal office, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange hereby proposes to amend its option trading rules to
extend the operation of its Pilot Program regarding minimum value sizes
for FLEX Options, currently scheduled to expire on March 28, 2011,\4\
until March 30, 2012. This filing does not propose any substantive
changes to the Pilot Program and contemplates that all other terms of
FLEX Options will remain the same. The Exchange believes that extending
the Pilot Program will benefit public customers and other market
participants who will be able to use FLEX Options to manage risk for
smaller portfolios.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62054 (May 6, 2010),
75 FR 27381 (May 14, 2010) (SR-NYSEArca-2010-34).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In support of the proposed extension of the Pilot Program, and as
required by the terms of the Pilot Program's implementation,\5\ the
Exchange has submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') a Pilot Program Report that provides an
analysis of the Pilot Program covering the period during which the
Pilot Program has been in effect. This Pilot Program Report includes
(i) data and analysis on the open interest and trading volume in (a)
FLEX Equity Options that have opening transactions with a minimum size
of 0 to 249 contracts and less than $1 million in underlying value; (b)
FLEX Index Options that have opening transactions with a minimum
opening size of less than $10 million in underlying equivalent value;
and (ii) analysis on the

types of investors that initiated opening FLEX Equity and Index Options
transactions (i.e., institutional, high net worth, or retail). The
report has been submitted to the Commission on a confidential basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that there is sufficient investor interest
and demand in the Pilot Program to warrant extension for an additional
year. The Exchange believes that the Pilot Program has provided
investors with additional means of managing their risk exposures and
carrying out their investment objectives. The Exchange has not
experienced any adverse market effects with respect to the Pilot
Program.
    If, in the future, the Exchange proposes an additional extension of
the Pilot Program, or should the Exchange propose to make the Pilot
Program permanent, the Exchange will submit, along with any filing
proposing such amendments to the Pilot Program, an additional Pilot
Program Report covering the period during which the Pilot Program was
in effect and including the details referenced above, along with the
nominal dollar value of the underlying security of each trade. The
Pilot Program Report would be submitted to the Commission at least two
months prior to the expiration date of the Pilot Program and would be
provided on a confidential basis.
    The Exchange notes that any positions established under this Pilot
Program would not be impacted by the expiration of the Pilot Program.
For example, a 10-contract FLEX Equity Option opening position that
overlies less than $1 million in the underlying security and expires in
January 2015 could be established during the Pilot Program. If the
Pilot Program were not extended, the position would continue to exist
and any further trading in the series would be subject to the minimum
value size requirements for continued trading in that series.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act''),\6\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),\7\ in particular, in that
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system.
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed extension of the
Pilot Program, which eliminates the minimum value size applicable to
FLEX Options, would provide greater opportunities for investors to
manage risk through the use of FLEX Options. Further, the Exchange
notes that it has not experienced any adverse effects from the
operation of the Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \8\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\9\
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) (iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \9\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \10\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\11\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has
requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay to
permit the current pilot to continue uninterrupted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires that a self-regulatory organization submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that the Exchange has satisfied
this requirement.
    \11\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that waiver of the operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest.
The Commission notes in waiving the 30-day operative delay that the
Exchange's original pilot was published for comment in the Federal
Register and the Commission did not receive any comments.\12\ Further,
the Exchange is proposing to extend the existing Pilot Program on the
same terms and conditions as they were originally approved by the
Commission. This includes, as described in more detail above, a
representation that the Exchange will continue to monitor the Pilot
Program and submit certain interim reports during the extended Pilot
Program period, as well as a final report covering the Pilot Program
period should the Exchange decide to extend or file for permanent
approval of the Pilot Program. Finally, the Commission notes that the
Exchange has represented that it has not experienced any adverse market
effects with respect to the Pilot Program. Based on the above, the
Commission finds that it is consistent with investor protection and the
public interest to waive the 30-day operative delay in accordance with
19b-4(f)(6)(iii) so that the Pilot Program can continue on an
uninterrupted basis, and therefore designates the proposal operative
upon filing.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra note 4.
    \13\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File

Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-10 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2011-10. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,
all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site
viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between
the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be
available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the
Commission does not edit personal identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR-
NYSEArca-2011-10 and should be submitted on or before April 18, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7231 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P