[Federal Register: December 27, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 248)]
[Notices]
[Page 77847-77849]
[DOCID:fr27de06-120]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-54966; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2006-89]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change and Amendment No. 1
Thereto Relating to Exchange Fees and Charges

December 19, 2006.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'').\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on December 1, 2006, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the
proposed rule change as described in Items, I, II, and III below, which
Items have been substantially prepared by NYSE Arca. On December 15,
2006, the Exchange submitted Amendment No. 1 to the proposed rule
change. NYSE Arca has filed the proposal pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) thereunder,\4\ which
renders the proposal effective upon filing with the Commission. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change, as amended, from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    NYSE Arca proposes to amend its Schedule of Fees and Charges For
Exchange Services (``Schedule'') to make a minor change to the Firm
Transaction Fee, eliminate certain obsolete fees, and make a non-
substantive formatting change to the Schedule. The text of the proposed
rule change is available on NYSE Arca's Web site at http://www.nysearca.com
, at the principal office of NYSE Arca, and at the

Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, NYSE Arca included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of the these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. NYSE Arca has prepared summaries, set forth in sections,
A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

 1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its Schedule in order to make a
minor change to the Firm Transaction Fee, eliminate certain obsolete
fees, and make a non-substantive formatting change.
Changes to the Firm Transaction Fee
    NYSE Arca charges transaction fees associated with all option
contracts that are executed on the Exchange. The current Firm
Transaction Fee applies to OTP Firm \5\ proprietary trades that have a
customer of that firm on the contra side of the transaction. The
Exchange offers this rate as an incentive to OTP Firms to direct their
customer orders to NYSE Arca for execution. NYSE Arca applies the Firm
Transaction Fee to all trades between an OTP Firm and a customer of the
same OTP Firm, whenever a proprietary account of the firm is used. This
includes market makers that trade against orders that their affiliated
firm represents for customers. The Firm Transaction Fee became
applicable for certain market maker transactions upon the filing of a
proposed rule change with the commission.\6\ At that time the Market
Maker Transaction Fee was $0.26 per contract and the Firm Transaction
Fee was $0.15 per contract. As stated above, the cost savings was
offered as a incentive for Firms to send addition customer orders to
NYSE Arca. As part of a more recent proposed rule change,\7\ the Market
Maker Transaction Fee was lowered to $0.16 per contract, representing a
savings of almost 40% over the previous fee. Because of the reduction
in the Market Maker Transaction Fee, the additional savings afforded by
the application of the Firm Transaction Fee in certain instances, is no
longer significant. In order to simplify the billing process, all
market maker transactions will now be billed the same the fee of $0.16
per contract. While this change represents a modest $0.01 increase in
certain cases, the Exchange believes that it is more than compensated
for by the previous reduction in the Market Maker Transaction Fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See NYSE Arca Rule (1(r).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 53165 (January 22,
2006), 71 FR 4955 (January 30, 2006) (SR-PCX-2005-136..
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54309 (August 11,
2006), 71 FR 48571 (August 21, 2006) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-25).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The change to this fee will be reflected in the footnote associated
with the Firm Transaction Fee on the Schedule.
Elimination of Obsolete Fees
    Due to changes in the market structure at NYSE Arca certain fees
have become outdate and obsolete. The Exchange proposes to eliminate
these fees from the Schedule.
     Order Cancellation Fee--This fee was applied to orders
were cancelled on the PCX Plus automated trading system. This system is
no longer in use and accordingly the fee no longer applies.
     Booth WorkStation Fee--This fee was assessed to OTP Firms
operating on the floor of the Exchange that used certain Exchange
provided workstations. These workstations have been replaced by firm
proprietary systems; therefore the fee no longer applies.
     Printer Fee--Prior to the introduction of the OX
system,\8\ the Exchange provided printers that would generate order
tickets in certain cases where orders were not electronically executed
or represented. OX is a fully automated system and does not need to
print order tickets. The printers are no longer in use and therefore
the user fee no longer applies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 54238 (July 28,
2006), 71 FR 44758 (August 7, 2006)(SR-NYSEArca-2006-13).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Market Maker Held Fees--Market Makers on the floor of the
Exchange now use proprietary trading systems to interface with the OX
system. The Market Maker Hand Held system is no longer in use on NYSE
Area; accordingly the fees associated with it no longer apply.
Administrative Changes
    the Exchange also proposes a change to the formatting of the
Schedule. Presently, the Schedule shows a list of explanatory end notes
on the last page of the Schedule. With the new format, the end notes
will be moved to the appropriate page that shows the corresponding fee
or charge. Except where previously noted, the language in the reference
notes will remain the same, just the formatting of the reference note
will change. The Exchange believes that by having the reference notes
on the same page as the corresponding charge or fee, the Schedule will
be more user friendly and easier to read.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with the
provisions of Section 6 of the Act, \9\ in general, and with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that the proposal provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among its OTP Holders \11\ and OTP Firms trading option
contracts on NYSE Arca.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f.
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
    \11\ See NYSE Arca rule 1(q).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
rule Change Received From Members, Participants or Others

    Written comments on the proposed rule change were neither solicited
nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing proposed rule change is subject to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \12\ and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4
thereunder \13\ because it establishes or changes a due, fee, or other
charge applicable only to a member imposed by the self-regulatory
organization. Accordingly, the proposal is effective upon Commission
receipt of the filing. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19bn-4(f)(2).
    \14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(C). For purposes of calculating the 60-
day period within which the Commission may summarily abrogate the
proposal, the Commission considers the period to commence on
December 15, 2006, the date on which the Exchange submitted
Amendment No. 1.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment from (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-NYSEArca-2006-89 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2006-89.
This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is
used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
 Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room. Copies of the
filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the
principal office of NYSE Arca. All comments received will be posted
without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying
information from submissions. You should submit only information that
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-NYSEArca-2006-89 and should be submitted on or before
January 17, 2007.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Market Regulation,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 06-9864 Filed 12-26-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-M


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 4 (Monday, January 7, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 935-936]
[FR Doc No: 2013-00012]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 13124-003]

Copper Valley Electric Association, Inc.; Notice of Availability
of Environmental Assessment

    In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission or FERC's)
regulations, 18 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 380 (Order No.
486, 52 Federal Register 47897), the Office of Energy Projects has
reviewed Copper Valley Electric Association, Inc.'s application for an
original license to construct the Allison Creek Hydroelectric Project
(FERC Project No. 13124-003). The proposed 6.5-megawatt project would
be located on Allison Creek near Valdez, Alaska. The project would not
occupy any federal lands.
    Staff prepared a draft environmental assessment (EA) which analyzes
the potential environmental effects of licensing the project, and
concludes that licensing the project, with appropriate environmental
protective measures, would not constitute a major federal action that
would significantly affect the quality of the human environment.
    A copy of the draft EA is available for review at the Commission in
the Public Reference Room or may be viewed on the Commission's Web site
at www.ferc.gov using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number
excluding the last three digits in the docket number field to access
the document. For assistance, contact FERC Online Support at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY,
202-502-8659.
    You may also register online at www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to be notified via email of new filings and issuances
related to this or other pending projects. For assistance, contact FERC
Online Support.
    Any comments should be filed within 45 days from the date of this
notice. Comments may be filed electronically via the Internet. See 18
CFR

385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and the instructions on the Commission's Web site
at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling.asp. Commenters can submit
brief comments up to 6,000 characters, without prior registration,
using the eComment system at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/ecomment.asp. You must include your name and contact information at the
end of your comments. For assistance, please contact FERC Online
Support. Although the Commission strongly encourages electronic filing,
documents may also be paper-filed. To paper-file, mail an original and
seven copies to: Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    For further information, contact Kim Nguyen by telephone at 202-
502-6105, or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: December 28, 2012.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-00012 Filed 1-4-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 247 (Friday, December 23, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 94382-94384]
[FR Doc No: 2016-31006]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2012-N-1021]

Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act; Notice to Public
of Web Site Location of Fiscal Year 2017 Proposed Guidance Development

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is
announcing the Web site location where the Agency will post two lists
of guidance documents that the Center for Devices and Radiological
Health (CDRH or the Center) intends to publish in fiscal year (FY)
2017. In addition, FDA has established a docket where interested
persons may comment on the priority of topics for guidance, provide
comments and/or propose draft language for those topics, suggest topics
for new or different guidance documents, comment on the applicability
of guidance documents that have issued previously, and provide any
other comments that could benefit the CDRH guidance program and its
engagement with stakeholders. This feedback is critical to the CDRH
guidance program to ensure that we meet stakeholder needs.

DATES: Submit either electronic or written comments by February 21,
2017.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:

Electronic Submissions

    Submit electronic comments in the following way:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are

solely responsible for ensuring that your comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a third party may not wish to be
posted, such as medical information, your or anyone else's Social
Security number, or confidential business information, such as a
manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your name,
contact information, or other information that identifies you in the
body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
     If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').

Written/Paper Submissions

    Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
     Mail/Hand delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
     For written/paper comments submitted to the Division of
Dockets Management, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
    Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2012-N-1021 for ``Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act;
Notice to Public of Web Site Location of Fiscal Year 2017 Proposed
Guidance Development.'' Received comments will be placed in the docket
and, except for those submitted as ``Confidential Submissions,''
publicly viewable at http://www.regulations.gov or at the Division of
Dockets Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
     Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' The Agency will
review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in
its consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the
claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be
available for public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Division of Dockets Management. If you do not
wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available,
you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body
of your comments and you must identify this information as
``confidential.'' Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not
be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other
applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of
comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or
access the information at: http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/dockets/default.htm.
    Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Division of Dockets Management, 5630 Fishers
Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erica Takai, Center for Devices and
Radiological Health, Food and Drug Administration,10903 New Hampshire
Ave., Bldg. 66, rm. 5456, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    During negotiations on the Medical Device User Fee Amendments of
2012 (MDUFA III), Title II, Food and Drug Administration Safety and
Innovation Act (Pub. L. 112-114), FDA agreed to meet a variety of
quantitative and qualitative goals intended to help get safe and
effective medical devices to market more quickly. Among these
commitments included:
     Annually posting a list of priority medical device
guidance documents that the Agency intends to publish within 12 months
of the date this list is published each fiscal year (the ``A-list'')
and
     Annually posting a list of device guidance documents that
the Agency intends to publish, as the Agency's guidance-development
resources permit each fiscal year (the ``B-list'').
    FDA welcomes comments on any or all of the guidance documents on
the lists as explained in 21 CFR 10.115(f)(5). FDA has established
Docket No. FDA-2012-N-1021 where comments on the FY 2017 lists, draft
language for guidance documents on those topics, suggestions for new or
different guidances, and relative priority of guidance documents may be
submitted and shared with the public (see ADDRESSES). FDA believes this
docket is a valuable tool for receiving information from interested
persons and will update these lists after considering public comments,
where appropriate. FDA anticipates that feedback from interested
persons will allow CDRH to better prioritize and more efficiently draft
guidances to meet the needs of the Agency and our stakeholders.
    In addition to posting the lists of prioritized device guidance
documents, FDA has committed to updating its Web site in a timely
manner to reflect the Agency's review of previously published guidance
documents, including the deletion of guidance documents that no longer
represent the Agency's interpretation of or policy on a regulatory
issue.
    Fulfillment of these commitments will be reflected through the
issuance of updated guidance on existing topics, removal of guidances
that that no longer reflect FDA's current thinking on a particular
topic, and annual updates to the A-list and B-list announced in this
notice.

II. CDRH Guidance Development Initiatives

A. Finalization of Draft Guidance Documents

    CDRH has identified as a priority, and has devoted resources to,
finalization of draft guidance documents. To assure the timely
completion or re-issuance of draft guidances, in FY 2015 CDRH committed
to performance goals for current and future draft guidance documents.
For draft guidance documents issued after October 1, 2014, CDRH
committed to finalize, withdraw, re-open the comment period, or issue
another draft guidance on the topic for 80 percent of the documents
within 3 years of the close of the comment period and for the remaining
20 percent, within 5 years. In FY 2016, CDRH finalized 2 and withdrew 5
of 12 draft guidances issued prior to October 1, 2010, and has been
continuing to work towards finalizing the remaining draft guidances.
Looking forward, in FY 2017, CDRH will strive to finalize, withdraw, or
re-open the comment period for 50 percent of existing draft guidances
issued prior to October 1, 2011. CDRH expects to renew or modify, as
appropriate, these performance goals in FY 2017 and subsequent years.

B. Earlier Stakeholder Involvement in Guidance Development

    CDRH has received feedback that stakeholders desire earlier
involvement in the guidance process and has taken steps to create a
mechanism to address this request. In FY 2016, in anticipation of
guidance documents expected to be developed, CDRH sought stakeholder
input regarding electromagnetic compatibility of electrically powered
medical devices and regarding utilizing animal studies to evaluate the
safety of organ preservation devices and solutions. FDA appreciated the
feedback received and considered it in the development of these
guidances. Demonstrating commitment to incorporating stakeholder input,
CDRH has included these guidances topics on the FY 2017 B-List as we
progress toward issuance of draft policies reflecting early stakeholder
input as appropriate.
    We also welcome any additional feedback for improving the guidance
program and the quality of CDRH guidance documents.

C. Applicability of Previously Issued Final Guidance

    CDRH has issued over 500 final guidance documents to provide
stakeholders with the Agency's thinking on numerous topics. Each
guidance reflected the Agency's current position at the time that it
was issued. However, the guidance program has issued these guidances
over a period of 30 years, raising the question of how current
previously issued final guidances remain. CDRH has resolved to address
this concern through a staged review of previously issued final
guidances in collaboration with stakeholders. At the Web site where
CDRH has posted the ``A-list'' and ``B-list'' for FY 2017, CDRH has
also posted a list of final guidance documents that issued in 2007,
1997, 1987, and 1977.\1\ CDRH is interested in external feedback on
whether any of these final guidances should be revised or withdrawn. In
addition, for guidances that are recommended for revision, information
explaining the need for revision, such as, the impact and risk to
public health associated with not revising the guidance, would also be
helpful as the Center considers potential action with respect to these
guidances. CDRH intends to provide these lists of previously issued
final guidances annually through FY 2025 so that by 2025, FDA and
stakeholders will have assessed the applicability of all guidances
older than 10 years. For instance, in the annual notice for FY 2018,
CDRH expects to provide a list of the final guidance documents that
issued in 2008, 1998, 1988, and 1978; the annual notice for FY 2019 is
expected to provide a list of the final guidance documents that issued
in 2009, 1999, 1989, and 1979, and so on. CDRH will consider the
comments received from this retrospective review when determining
priorities for updating guidance documents and will revise these as
resources permit.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The retrospective list of final guidances does not include
the following: (1) Documents that are not guidances but were
inadvertently categorized as guidance such as scientific
publications, advisory opinions, and interagency agreements; (2)
guidances actively being revised by CDRH; and (3) special controls
documents.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In FY 2016, CDRH received comments regarding guidances issued in
2006, 1996, and 1986, and has withdrawn 12 guidance documents in
response to comments received and because these guidance documents were
determined to no longer represent the Agency's current thinking. One
guidance on this retrospective review list was revised, and revision of
several guidance documents is also being considered as resources
permit.
    Consistent with Good Guidance Practices regulation at 21 CFR
10.115(f)(4), CDRH would appreciate suggestions that CDRH revise or
withdraw an already existing guidance document. We request that the
suggestion clearly explain why the guidance document should be revised
or withdrawn and, if applicable, how it should be revised. While we are
requesting feedback on the list of previously issued final guidances
located in the annual agenda Web site, feedback on any guidance is
appreciated and will be considered.

III. Web Site Location of Guidance Lists

    This notice announces the Web site location of the document that
provides the A and B lists of guidance documents, which CDRH is
intending to publish during FY 2017. To access these two lists, visit
FDA's Web site at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulationandGuidance/GuidanceDocuments/ucm529396.htm. We note
that the topics on this and past guidance priority lists may be removed
or modified based on current priorities, as well as comments received
regarding these lists. Furthermore, FDA and CDRH priorities are subject
to change at any time (e.g., newly identified safety issues). Topics on
this and past guidance priority lists may be removed or modified based
on current priorities. The Agency is not required to publish every
guidance on either list if the resources needed would be to the
detriment of meeting quantitative review timelines and statutory
obligations. In addition, the Agency is not precluded from issuing
guidance documents that are not on either list.
    Stakeholder feedback on guidance priorities is important to ensure
that the CDRH guidance program meets the needs of stakeholders. The
feedback received on the FY 2016 list was mostly in agreement, and CDRH
continued to work toward issuing the guidances on this list. In FY
2016, CDRH issued 20 of 33 guidances on the FY 2016 list (14 from the
A-list, 6 from the B-list). In addition, for the guidances that were on
the FY 2016 A or B list but could not be published within FY 2016, and
for which we received feedback that these guidances were of high
priority, CDRH has recommitted to publish these guidances by placing
them on the annual agenda for FY 2017, as appropriate.

    Dated: December 19, 2016.
Leslie Kux,
Associate Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2016-31006 Filed 12-22-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register: November 28, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 228)]
[Notices]
[Page 67304]
[DOCID:fr28no07-50]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2007-0282; FRL-8499-8]

EPA and Army Corps of Engineers Guidance Regarding Clean Water
Act Jurisdiction After Rapanos

AGENCIES: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD; and U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; extension of comment period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: On June 5, 2007, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced agency guidance regarding Clean
Water Act (CWA) jurisdiction following the U.S. Supreme Court's
decision in the consolidated cases Rapanos v. United States and
Carabell v. United States (``Rapanos''). The agencies issued this
guidance to ensure that jurisdictional determinations, administrative
enforcement actions, and other relevant agency actions being conducted
under CWA section 404 are consistent with the Rapanos decision and
provide effective protection for public health and the environment. A
six-month public comment period to solicit input on early experience
with implementing the guidance began on June 8, 2007. The agencies are
extending the public comment period by 45 days.

DATES: Public comments are now due by January 21, 2008.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OW-
2007-0282, by one of the following methods:
     http:/www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions
for submitting comments.
     E-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Include the docket number, EPA-
HQ-OW-2007-0282 in the subject line of the message.
     Mail: Water Docket, Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
     Hand Delivery: 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Room 3334,
Washington, Dc 20460. Such deliveries are only accepted during the
Docket's normal hours of operations, and special arrangements should be
made for deliveries of boxed information.
     Instructions: Instructions for submitting comments are
provided in the notice published on June 8, 2007 (72 FR 31824).
Consideration will be given to all comments received by January 21,
2008.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Russell Kaiser, Regulatory Community
of Practice (CECW-CO), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Headquarters, 441
G Street, NW., Washington, DC 20314; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>:
fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Donna M. Downing, Office of Water
(4502T), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW.,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the June 8, 2007, issue of the Federal
Register (72 FR 31824), the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced the issuance of agency guidance,
which took effect on that date, regarding Clean Water Act (CWA)
jurisdiction following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the
consolidated cases Rapanos v. Carabell v. United States (126 S. Ct.
2208 (2006)) (``Rapanos'').
    The agencies invited public comment and case studies during the
first six months implementing the guidance, only early experience with
implementing the guidance. Several entities have requested an extension
of the comment period for the guidance. The EPA and the Corps find that
a 45-day extension of the comment period is warranted. Therefore, the
comment period is extended until January 21, 2008.
    The agencies, within nine months after the Rapanos guidance was
issued, intend to either reissue, revise, or suspend the guidance after
carefully considering the public comments received and field experience
with implementing the guidance. A copy of the guidance can be found on
EPA's Web site at http://www.epa.gov/owow/wetlands/guidance/
CWAwaters.html and on the Corps' Web site at http://www.usace.army.mil/
cw/cecwo/reg/.

    Dated: November 21, 2007.
Benjamin H. Grumbles,
Assistant Administrator for Water, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency.
[FR Doc. 07-5867 Filed 11-27-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-M


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 17 (Wednesday, January 27, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 4626]
[FR Doc No: 2016-01634]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OARM-2011-0997; FRL-9939-85-OEI]

Information Collection Request Submitted to OMB for Review and
Approval; Comment Request; Recordkeeping and Reporting Related to
Diesel Fuel Sold in 2001 and Later Years; Tax-Exempt (Dyed) Highway
Diesel Fuel; and Non-Road Locomotive & Marine Diesel Fuel (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency has submitted an
information collection request (ICR), ``Recordkeeping and Reporting
Related to Diesel Fuel Sold in 2001 & Later Years; for Tax-Exempt
(Dyed) Highway Diesel Fuel; & Non-Road Locomotive & Marine Diesel
Fuel'' (EPA ICR No. 1718.10, OMB Control No. 2060-0308) to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). This is a
proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently approved through May
29, 2015. Public comments were previously requested via the Federal
Register (80 FR 30677) on May 29, 2015 during a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments. A
fuller description of the ICR is given below, including its estimated
burden and cost to the public. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor and
a person is not required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before February 26,
2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing Docket ID Number EPA-HQ-
OAR-2007-1121, to (1) EPA online using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB via email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Address comments to OMB Desk Officer
for EPA.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Geanetta Heard, Fuel Compliance
Center, 64106J, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:
202-565-2085; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Abstract: The EPA's diesel fuel regulations under 40 CFR part 80,
subpart I, are applicable to highway (``motor vehicle'' or ``MV'')
diesel fuel and non-road, locomotive and marine diesel fuel (NRLM) and
heating oil (HO). Most of the information collected under this ICR is
used to evaluate compliance with the requirements of the regulations.
Since virtually all MV diesel fuel was required to meet a 15 part per
million (ppm) standard as of June 1, 2010, very little reporting
related to MV diesel fuel remains. However, reporting related to NRLM
and HO will continue throughout the course of this proposed ICR
renewal. The activities associated with this ICR include: Registration
(all parties have registered; updates to existing registrations are
still possible); compliance reports (mostly covering NRLM and HO;
updates to prior compliance reports for MV diesel are still possible);
research and development (R&D) exemptions; generation and retention of
quality assurance (QA) records; foreign refiner recordkeeping and
reporting; placement of PTD codes (a typically automated process, to
indicate the presence of dye in tax-exempt fuel and/or sulfur content).
This ICR renewal contains provisions related to qualification of
laboratories on performance-based test methods. Virtually all
applications have already been received from laboratories and acted
upon by EPA.
    Form Numbers: EPA Forms 5900-351, 5900-333, 5900-352, 5900-323,
5900-324, 5900-325, 5900-326, 5900-327, 5900-328, 5900-329, 5900-350,
and 420-B-14-066a.
    Respondents/affected entities: Refiners, importers, testing labs.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 80).
    Estimated number of respondents: 5753 (total).
    Frequency of response: Yearly and semiannually.
    Total estimated burden: 11,078 hours (per year). Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $1,118,878 (per year), includes $0 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is a decrease of 7,872 hours in the
total estimated respondent burden compared with the ICR currently
approved by OMB. This is due to the decreased number of reports
required.

Courtney Kerwin,
Acting Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-01634 Filed 1-26-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 43 (Tuesday, March 5, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7963-7965]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03881]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-85207; File No. SR-EMERALD-2019-09]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX Emerald, LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Establish MIAX Emerald Top of Market (``ToM'') Data Feed, MIAX Emerald
Complex Top of Market (``cToM'') Data Feed, MIAX Emerald Administrative
Information Subscriber (``AIS'') Data Feed, and MIAX Emerald Order Feed
(``MOR'')

February 27, 2019.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on February 26, 2019, MIAX Emerald, LLC (``MIAX Emerald'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission
is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing a proposal to establish certain market data
products. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange's website at http://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/emerald,
at MIAX Emerald's principal office, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to establish the MIAX Emerald Top of Market
(``ToM'') data feed, MIAX Emerald Complex Top of Market (``cToM'') data
feed, MIAX Emerald Administrative Information Subscriber (``AIS'') data
feed, and MIAX Emerald Order Feed (``MOR'').
    ToM provides market participants with a direct data feed that
includes the Exchange's best bid and offer, with aggregate size, and
last sale information, based on order and quoting interest on the
Exchange. The ToM data feed includes data that is identical to the data
sent to the processor for the Options Price Reporting Authority
(``OPRA''). The ToM and OPRA data leave the MIAX Emerald System \3\ at
the same time, as required under Section 5.2(c)(iii)(B) of the Limited
Liability Company Agreement of the Options Price Reporting Authority
LLC (the ``OPRA Plan''), which prohibits the dissemination of
proprietary information on any more timely basis than the same
information is furnished to the OPRA system for inclusion in OPRA's
consolidated dissemination of options information. ToM will also
contain a feature that provides the number of Priority Customer \4\
contracts that are included in the size associated with the Exchange's
best bid and offer.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The term ``System'' means the automated trading system used
by the Exchange for the trading of securities. See Exchange Rule
100.
    \4\ The term ``Priority Customer'' means a person or entity that
(i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) does not place
more than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a
calendar month for its own beneficial account(s). See Exchange Rule
100.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    cToM will provide subscribers with the same information as the ToM
market data product as it relates to the Strategy Book, i.e., the
Exchange's best bid and offer for a complex strategy, with aggregate
size, based on displayable order and quoting interest in the complex
strategy on the Exchange. cToM will also provide subscribers with the
identification of the complex strategies currently trading on MIAX
Emerald; complex strategy last sale information; and the status of
securities underlying the complex strategy (e.g., halted, open, or
resumed). cToM is distinct from ToM, and anyone wishing to receive cToM
data must subscribe to cToM regardless of whether they are a current
ToM subscriber. ToM subscribers are not required to subscribe to cToM,
and cToM subscribers are not required to subscribe to ToM.
    AIS provides market participants with a direct data feed that
allows subscribers to receive real-time updates of products traded on
MIAX Emerald, trading status for MIAX Emerald and products traded on
MIAX Emerald, and liquidity seeking event notifications. The AIS market
data feed includes opening imbalance condition information, opening
routing information, expanded quote range information, post-halt
notifications, and liquidity refresh condition information. AIS real-
time messages are disseminated over multicast to achieve a fair
delivery mechanism. AIS notifications provide current electronic system
status allowing subscribers to take necessary actions immediately.
    MOR provides market participants with a direct data feed that
allows subscribers to receive real-time updates of options orders,
products traded on MIAX Emerald, MIAX Emerald Options System status,
and MIAX Emerald Options Underlying trading status. Subscribers to the
data feed will get a list of all options symbols and strategies that
will be traded and sourced on that feed at the start of every session.
    The proposed data products provide valuable information that can
help subscribers make informed investment

decisions, and operate in the same manner as similar data products
offered by the Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC (``MIAX
Options''), namely the MIAX Options Top of Market data product (``MIAX
ToM''),\5\ MIAX Options Complex Top of Market data product (``MIAX
cToM''),\6\ MIAX Options Administrative Information Subscriber data
product (``AIS''),\7\ and the MIAX Options Order Feed data product
(``MOR'').\8\ Each of these proposed data products is available to
members and non-members, and to both professional and non-professional
subscribers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ For a complete description of the MIAX Options ToM data
product, see Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 69007 (February
28, 2013), 78 FR 14617 (March 6, 2013) (SR-MIAX-2013-05); 69518 (May
6, 2013), 78 FR 27462 (May 10, 2013) (SR-MIAX-2013-18); 73395
(October 21, 2014), 79 FR 63979 (October 27, 2014) (SR-MIAX-2014-
53).
    \6\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79146 (October 24,
2016), 81 FR 75171 (October 28, 2016) (SR-MIAX-2016-36).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 69320 (April 5,
2013), 78 FR 21661 (April 11, 2013) (SR-MIAX-2013-13); 82740
(February 20, 2018), 83 FR 8304 (February 26, 2018) (SR-MIAX-2018-
04).
    \8\ For a complete description of the MOR data product, see
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 74759 (April 17, 2015), 80 FR
22749 (April 23, 2015) (SR-MIAX-2015-28).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange represents that it will make ToM, cToM, AIS, and MOR
equally available to any market participant that wishes to subscribe to
any of those products. The Exchange is not presently going to charge
market participants any fees associated with these market data
products. If, and when, the Exchange proposes to establish such fees,
the Exchange will submit a proposed rule change under 19b-4.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) \9\ of the Act in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) \10\ of the Act in particular, in that it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices,
to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The ToM market data product is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade by providing all subscribers with top of
market data that includes the Exchange's best bid and offer, with
aggregate size, and last sale information, based on order and quoting
interest on the Exchange that should enable them to make informed
decisions on trading on MIAX Emerald by using the ToM data to assess
current market conditions that directly affect such decisions.
    The cToM market data product is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade by providing all subscribers with top of
market data that includes similar information provide via ToM but for
the Exchange's complex order Strategy Book \11\ including the
Exchange's best bid and offer for a complex strategy, with aggregate
size, based on displayable order and quoting interest in the complex
strategy on the Exchange that should enable subscribers to make
informed decisions on trading on MIAX Emerald by using the cToM data to
assess current market conditions that directly affect such decisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The ``Strategy Book'' is the Exchange's electronic book of
complex orders and complex quotes. See Exchange Rule 518(a)(17).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The MOR market data product is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade by providing all subscribers with limit
order book data that should enable subscribers to make informed
decisions on trading in MIAX Emerald options by using the MOR data to
assess current market conditions that directly affect such decisions.
The proposed market data product facilitates transactions in
securities, removes impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free
and open market and a national market system by enhancing the
subscribers' ability to make decisions on trading strategy, and by
providing data that should help bring about such decisions in a timely
manner to the protection of investors and the public interest. The
market data provided by MOR removes impediments to, and is designed to
further perfect, the mechanisms of a free and open market and a
national market system by making the MIAX Emerald market more
transparent and accessible to market participants making routing
decisions concerning their options orders. The MOR market data product
is also designed to protect investors and the public interest by
providing data to subscribers that is already currently available on
other exchanges and will enable MIAX Emerald to compete with such other
exchanges, thereby offering market participants with additional data in
order to seek the market center with the best price and the most
liquidity on which to execute their transactions, all to the benefit of
investors and the public interest, and to the marketplace as a whole.
    The AIS market data product is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade by providing all subscribers with
administrative information concerning product states and liquidity
seeking events on the Exchange that should enable them to make informed
decisions on trading in MIAX Emerald options by using the AIS data to
assess current market conditions that directly affect such decisions.
The proposed market data product facilitates transactions in
securities, removes impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free
and open market and a national market system by enhancing the
subscribers' ability to make decisions on trading strategy, and by
providing data that should help bring about such decisions in a timely
manner to the protection of investors and the public interest. The
market data provided by AIS removes impediments to, and is designed to
further perfect, the mechanisms of a free and open market and a
national market system by making the MIAX Emerald market more
transparent and accessible to market participants making routing
decisions concerning their options orders. The AIS market data product
is also designed to protect investors and the public interest by
providing data to subscribers that is already currently available on
other exchanges and will enable MIAX Emerald to compete with such other
exchanges, thereby offering market participants with additional data in
order to seek the market center with the best price and the most
liquidity on which to execute their transactions, all to the benefit of
investors and the public interest, and to the marketplace as a whole.
    The proposed ToM, cToM, AIS, and MOR market data products
facilitate transactions in securities, remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market
system by enhancing the subscriber's ability to make decisions on
trading strategy and by providing data which should help bring about
such decisions in a timely manner to the protection of investors and
the public interest. The market data provided by ToM, cToM, AIS and MOR
removes impediments to, and is designed to further perfect, the
mechanisms of a free and open market and a national market system by
making the MIAX Emerald market more transparent and accessible to
market participants making routing decisions concerning their options
orders. The Exchange notes that the data provided on each of these data
products are

similar to and provide the same data as provided by data products of
MIAX Options with respect to options traded on that exchange.\12\ The
Exchange believes that it is in the public interest to make similar
information available with respect to options traded on MIAX Emerald.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra notes 5, 6, 7, and 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed ToM, cToM, AIS, and MOR market data products are also
designed to protect investors and the public interest by providing data
to subscribers that is already currently available on other competing
exchanges which are similar to MIAX Emerald \13\ and will enable MIAX
Emerald to compete with such other exchanges, thereby offering market
participants with additional data in order to seek the market center
with the best price and the most liquidity on which to execute their
transactions, all to the benefit of investors and the public interest,
and to the marketplace as a whole.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'') is a maker-taker pricing model
exchange similar to MIAX Emerald and has similar data products to
ToM and MOR available to GEMX users, including the Nasdaq GEMX Top
Quote Feed and Nasdaq GEMX Order Feed. See Nasdaq GEMX Options 7,
Pricing Schedule, Section 7, Market Data.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. On the contrary,
the Exchange believes that the new market data products will enhance
competition in the U.S. options markets by providing users of MIAX
Emerald market data products that are similar to that which are
currently provided on other competing options exchanges.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days after the date of the filing, or such
shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective
pursuant to 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \15\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \16\
thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \16\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) normally does
not become operative for 30 days from the date of filing. However, Rule
19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \17\ permits the Commission to designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and
the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the
30-day operative delay. The Exchange states that waiver of the
operative delay will enable the Exchange to make the ToM, cToM, AIS,
and MOR market data products available to subscribers at the time of
the launch of trading on the Exchange, which is scheduled for March 1,
2019.\18\ The Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public
interest and hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates
the proposal operative on March 1, 2019.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \18\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84891 (December 20,
2018), 83 FR 67421 (December 28, 2018) (File No. 10-233) (order
approving application of MIAX EMERALD, LLC for registration as a
national securities exchange.)
    \19\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR- EMERALD-2019-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-EMERALD-2019-09. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. All submissions should refer to
File Number SR-EMERALD-2019-09 and should be submitted on or before
March 26, 2019.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-03881 Filed 3-4-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: October 30, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 211)]
[Notices]
[Page 64612]
[DOCID:fr30oc08-41]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. QF09-37-001]

Ausra CA I, LLC; Notice of Filing

October 24, 2008.
    Take notice that on October 21, 2008, Ausra CA I, LLC, filed an
Application for Certification as a Qualifying Small Power Production
Facility pursuant to 18 CFR 292.207(b) of the Commission's regulations.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant and all the parties in this proceeding.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll-free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on November 12, 2008.

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-25917 Filed 10-29-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14380-14382]
[FR Doc No: 2023-04767]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

[Docket No. USCG-2023-0099]

National Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee; March 2023
Meetings

AGENCY: U.S. Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice of Federal Advisory Committee meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The National Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee
(Committee) will conduct a series of meetings over three days in New
Orleans, LA, to discuss issues relating to personnel in the United
States Merchant Marine including the training, qualifications,
certification, documentation, and fitness of mariners.

DATES:
    Meetings: The National Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee
is scheduled to meet on Tuesday, March 28, 2023, from 9 a.m. until 4:30
p.m. Central Daylight Time (CDT), Wednesday, March 29, 2023, from 9
a.m. until 4:30 p.m. (CDT), and Thursday, March 30, 2023, from 9 a.m.
until 3:30 p.m. (CDT). Committee meetings on Tuesday, March 28, and
Wednesday, March 29, will include periods during which the Committee
will break into subcommittees (open to public). These meetings may
adjourn early if the Committee has completed its business.
    Comments and supporting documentation: To ensure your comments are
received by Committee members before the meetings, submit your written
comments no later than March 21, 2023.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at the Omni Riverfront Hotel,
additional information about the facility can be found at:
www.omnihotels.com/hotels/new-orleans-riverfront.
    The National Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee is

committed to ensuring all participants have equal access regardless of
disability status. If you require reasonable accommodation due to a
disability to fully participate, please email Mrs. Megan Johns Henry at
[email protected] or call at<PHONE_NUMBER> as soon as possible.
    Instructions: You are free to submit comments at any time,
including orally at the meetings as time permits, but if you want
Committee members to review your comments before the meetings, please
submit your comments no later than March 21, 2023. We are particularly
interested in comments on the topics in the ``Agenda'' section below.
We encourage you to submit comments through the Federal eRulemaking
Portal at https://www.regulations.gov. If your material cannot be
submitted using https://www.regulations.gov, email the individual in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document for
alternate instructions. You must include the docket number [USCG-2023-
0099]. Comments received will be posted without alteration at http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided. You
may wish to review the Privacy and Security notice available on the
https://www.regulations.gov. For more about the Privacy and submissions
in response to this document, see DHS's eRulemaking System of Records
notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). If you encounter technical
difficulties with comment submission, contact the individual listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this notice.
    Docket Search: Documents mentioned in this notice as being
available in the docket, and all public comments, will be in our online
docket at https://www.regulations.gov and can be viewed by following
that website's instructions. Additionally, if you go to the online
docket and sign-up for email alerts, you will be notified when comments
are posted.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mrs. Megan Johns Henry, Alternate
Designated Federal Officer of the National Merchant Marine Personnel
Advisory Committee, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or email
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice of these meetings is in compliance
with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 117-286, 5 U.S.C. ch.
10). The National Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee is
authorized by section 601 of the Frank LoBiondo Act of 2018, and is
codified in 46 U.S.C. 15103. The Committee operates under the
provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 117-286, 5
U.S.C. ch. 10), and 46 U.S.C. 15109. The National Merchant Marine
Personnel Advisory Committee provides advice and recommendations to the
Secretary of Homeland Security through the Commandant of the United
States Guard on matters relating to personnel in the United States
Merchant Marine including the training, qualifications, certification,
documentation, and fitness of mariners.
    Agenda: The National Merchant Marine Personnel Advisory Committee
will meet on Tuesday, March 28, 2023, Wednesday, March 29, 2023, and
Thursday, March 30, 2023, to review, discuss, deliberate, and formulate
recommendations, as appropriate on the following topics:

Day 1

    The agenda for the March 28, 2023 meeting is as follows:
    (1) The full Committee will meet briefly to discuss the
subcommittees' business/task statements, which are listed under
paragraph (10) under Day 3 below.
    (2) During the morning session of the meeting, subcommittees will
separately address and work on the following task statements, which are
available for viewing at https://homeport.uscg.mil/missions/federal-advisory-committees/national-merchant-marine-personnel-advisory-committee-(nmerpac)/task-statements:
    (a.) Task Statement 23-X1, Review of Navigation and Vessel
Inspection Circular 03-14, Guidelines for Approval of Training Courses
and Programs;
    (b.) Task Statement 22-3, Mariner Credentialing Program (MCP)
Transformation; and
    (c.) Task Statement 21-9, Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault,
Prevention and Culture Change in the Merchant Marine.
    (3) During the afternoon session of the meeting, subcommittees will
separately address and work on the following task statements, which are
available for viewing at https://homeport.uscg.mil/missions/federal-advisory-committees/national-merchant-marine-personnel-advisory-committee-(nmerpac)/task-statements:
    (a.) Task Statement 23-X1, Review of Navigation and Vessel
Inspection Circular 03-14, Guidelines for Approval of Training Courses
and Programs;
    (b.) Task Statement 22-3, Mariner Credentialing Program (MCP)
Transformation; and
    (c.) Task Statement 21-9, Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault,
Prevention and Culture Change in the Merchant Marine.
    (4) Report of subcommittees. At end of the day, the Chair or Co-
Chairs of the subcommittees will report to the full Committee on what
was accomplished. The full Committee will not take action on this date
and the Chair or Co-Chairs of the subcommittees will present a full
report to the Committee on Day 3 of the meeting.
    (5) Adjournment of meeting.

Day 2

    The agenda for the March 29, 2023 meeting is as follows:
    (1) The full Committee will meet briefly to discuss the
subcommittees' business/task statements, which are listed under
paragraph (9) under Day 3 below.
    (2) During the morning session of the meeting, subcommittees will
separately address and work on the following task statements, which are
available for viewing at https://homeport.uscg.mil/missions/federal-advisory-committees/national-merchant-marine-personnel-advisory-committee-(nmerpac)/task-statements:
    (a.) Task Statement 23-X1, Review of Navigation and Vessel
Inspection Circular 03-14, Guidelines for Approval of Training Courses
and Programs;
    (b.) Task Statement 21-2, Communication Between External
Stakeholders and the Mariner Credentialing Program; and
    (c.) Task Statement 21-3, Military Education, Training and
Assessment for STCW and National Mariner Endorsements.
    (3) During the afternoon session of the meeting, subcommittees will
separately address and work on the following task statements, which are
available for viewing at https://homeport.uscg.mil/missions/federal-advisory-committees/national-merchant-marine-personnel-advisory-committee-(nmerpac)/task-statements:
    (a.) Task Statement 23-X1, Review of Navigation and Vessel
Inspection Circular 03-14, Guidelines for Approval of Training Courses
and Programs;
    (b.) Task Statement 21-2, Communication Between External
Stakeholders and the Mariner Credentialing Program; and
    (c.) Task Statement 22-1, Propulsion Power Limitations.
    (4) Report of subcommittees. At end of the day, the Chair or Co-
Chairs of the subcommittees will report to the full Committee on what
was accomplished. The full Committee will not take action on this date
and the Chair or Co-Chairs of the subcommittees will present a full

report to the Committee on Day 3 of the meeting.
    (5) Adjournment of meeting.

Day 3

    The agenda for the March 30, 2023 meeting is as follows:
    (1) Introduction.
    (2) Designated Federal Officer remarks.
    (3) Roll call of Committee members and determination of a quorum.
    (4) Adoption of the agenda.
    (5) Acceptance of Minutes from Committee Meeting Three (September
9, 2022).
    (6) Remarks from U.S. Coast Guard Leadership.
    (7) Introduction of new task.
    (8) Office of Merchant Mariner Credentialing presentation.
    (9) National Maritime Center presentation.
    (10) Reports from the subcommittee Chair or Co-Chairs.
    The Committee will review the information presented on the
following Task Statements and deliberate on any recommendations
presented by the subcommittees, recommendations may be approved and
completed tasks may be closed. Official action on these topics may be
taken:
    (a) Task Statement 21-1, Review of IMO Model Courses Being
Validated by the IMO HTW Subcommittee;
    (b) Task Statement 21-2, Communication Between External
Stakeholders and the Mariner Credentialing Program, including amendment
Task Statement 21-2A, Reviewing Assessments in NVICS for STCW;
    (c) Task Statement 21-3, Military Education, Training, and
Assessment for STCW and National Mariner Endorsements;
    (d) Task Statement 21-04, STCW Convention and STCW Code Review;
    (e) Task Statement 21-5, Review of Merchant Mariner Rating and
Officer Endorsement Job Task Analyses, including amendment Task
Statement 21-5A, JTA to Mass Mapping;
    (f) Task Statement 21-6, Sea Service for Merchant Mariner
Credential Endorsements;
    (g) Task Statement 21-8, Remote Operators of Maritime Autonomous
Surface Ships;
    (h) Task Statement 21-9, Sexual Harassment and Sexual Assault-
Prevention and Culture Change in the Merchant Marine, including
amendment Task Statement 21-9A, Training for Sexual Assault and Sexual
Harassment Prevention and Response;
    (i) Task Statement 22-1, Propulsion Power Limits; and
    (j) Task Statement 22-2, Alternative Methods for Meeting STCW
Training Requirements at the Operational Level;
    (k) Task Statement 23-X1, Review of Navigation and Vessel
Inspection Circular (NVIC) 03-14, Guidelines for Approval of Training
Courses and Programs.
    (11) Public comment period.
    (12) Closing remarks.
    (13) Adjournment of meeting.
    A copy of all meeting documentation will be available at https://homeport.uscg.mil/missions/federal-advisory-committees/national-merchant-marine-personnel-advisory-committee-(nmerpac) by March 21,
2023. Alternatively, you may contact the individual noted in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.
    Public comments or questions will be taken throughout the meetings
as the Committee discusses the issues, and prior to deliberations and
voting. There will also be a public comment period at the end of the
meeting on March 30, 2023, at approximately 2:30 p.m. (CDT). Public
comments will be limited to 3 minutes per speaker. Please note that the
public comments period will end following the last call for comments.
Please contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to register as a speaker.

    Dated: March 3, 2023.
Benjamin J. Hawkins,
Deputy Director, Commercial Regulations and Standards.
[FR Doc. 2023-04767 Filed 3-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 144 (Tuesday, July 28, 2015)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 44896-44898]
[FR Doc No: 2015-18338]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2015-1136; Airspace Docket No. 15-ANM-12]

Proposed Amendment of Class D and Class E Airspace, Revocation of
Class E Airspace; Mountain Home, ID

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to modify Class D airspace, Class E
surface area airspace, Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface, and remove Class E surface area

airspace designated as an extension at Mountain Home AFB, Mountain
Home, ID. After reviewing the airspace, the FAA found it necessary to
increase the Class D airspace area and reduce the Class E airspace
areas for the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
operations for arriving and departing aircraft at the airport. This
action also would initiate the use of geographic coordinates as
reference points instead of navigation aids to describe the controlled
airspace areas, and would update the geographic coordinates of Mountain
Home Municipal Airport.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 11, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2015-
1136; Airspace Docket No. 15-ANM-12, at the beginning of your comments.
You may also submit comments through the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the public docket containing the
proposal, any comments received, and any final disposition in person in
the Dockets Office between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office (telephone 1-800-
647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at the above address.
    FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed online at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. The Order is also available for inspection
at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-
6030, or go to http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal-regulations/ibr_locations.html.
    FAA Order 7400.9, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, is
published yearly and effective on September 15. For further
information, you can contact the Airspace Policy and Regulations Group,
Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW.,
Washington, DC, 20591; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Steve Haga, Federal Aviation
Administration, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center, 1601
Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part, A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient
use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority
as it would amend Class D and Class E airspace at Mountain Home AFB,
Mountain Home, ID.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2015-1136;
Airspace Docket No. 15-ANM-12.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received, and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see the ADDRESSES section for the address and phone number)
between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the Northwest Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic Organization, Western Service
Center, Operations Support Group, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA
98057.
    Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future
NPRMs should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking,<PHONE_NUMBER>,
for a copy of Advisory Circular No. 11-2A, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking Distribution System, which describes the application
procedure.

Availability and Summary of Documents Proposed for Incorporation by
Reference

    This document proposes to amend FAA Order 7400.9Y, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and effective
September 15, 2014. FAA Order 7400.9Y is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this proposed rule. FAA Order 7400.9Y lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to Title 14 Code of Federal
Regulations (14 CFR) Part 71 by modifying Class D airspace, Class E
surface area airspace, Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet
above the surface, and removing Class E surface area airspace as an
extension as this airspace is no longer needed, at Mountain Home AFB,
Mountain Home, ID. The FAA found additional Class D airspace necessary
to protect instrument arrival procedures at the airport. Class D
airspace would extend upward from the surface to and including 5,500
feet within a 5-mile radius northeast of Mountain Home AFB, extending
to 6.5 miles to the southeast and northwest of the airport. Class E
surface area airspace would extend upward from the surface within a 5-
mile radius northeast of Mountain Home AFB, extending to 6.5 miles to
the southeast and northwest of the airport. Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface would be modified to within a
7.7-mile radius northeast of Mountain Home AFB, extending to 12.4 miles
to the northeast, and 17.7 miles to the east. This action would also
update the geographic coordinates of Mountain Home Municipal Airport.
    Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in
paragraph 5000, 6002, 6004, and 6005, respectively, of FAA Order
7400.9Y, dated August 6, 2014, and effective September 15, 2014, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR

71.1. The Class D and Class E airspace designations listed in this
document will be published subsequently in the Order.
    The FAA has determined this proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
Therefore, this proposed regulation; (1) is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal. Since
this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic procedures
and air navigation, it is certified this proposed rule, when
promulgated, would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1E, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR part 71 continues to read as
follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.9Y,
Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 6, 2014, and
effective September 15, 2014, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 5000: Class D Airspace.

* * * * *

ANM ID D Mountain Home, ID [Modified]

Mountain Home AFB, ID
    (Lat. 43[deg]02'37'' N., long. 115[deg]52'21'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface to and including
5,500 feet MSL within a 5-mile radius of the Mountain Home AFB, and
within 2 miles each side of the 135[deg] bearing from the airport
extending from the 5-mile radius to 6.5 miles southeast of the
airport, and within 2 miles each side of the 315[deg] bearing from
the airport extending from the 5-mile radius to 6.5 miles northwest
of the airport. This Class D airspace area is effective during the
specific dates and times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will thereafter be continuously
published in the Airport/Facility Directory.

Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace Designated as Surface Areas.

* * * * *

ANM ID E2 Mountain Home, ID [Modified]

Mountain Home AFB, ID
    (Lat. 43[deg]02'37'' N., long. 115[deg]52'21'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from the surface within a 5-mile
radius of the Mountain Home AFB, and within 2 miles each side of the
135[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 5-mile radius
to 6.5 miles southeast of the airport, and within 2 miles each side
of the 315[deg] bearing from the airport extending from the 5-mile
radius to 6.5 miles northwest of the airport.

Paragraph 6004 Class E Airspace Areas Designated as an Extension to
a Class D or Class E Surface Area.

* * * * *

ANM ID E4 Mountain Home, ID [Removed]

Paragraph 6005+Class E Airspace Areas Extending Upward From 700
Feet or More Above the Surface of the Earth

* * * * *

ANM ID E5 Mountain Home, ID [Modified]

Mountain Home AFB, ID
    (Lat. 43[deg]02'37'' N., long. 115[deg]52'21'' W.)
Mountain Home Municipal Airport
    (Lat. 43[deg]07'54'' N., long. 115[deg]43'50'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 43[deg]06'48'' N., long.
115[deg]28'39'' W.; to lat. 43[deg]02'06'' N., long. 115[deg]31'12''
W.; to lat. 43[deg]03'25'' N., long. 115[deg]36'21'' W.; to lat.
42[deg]54'24'' N., long. 115[deg]48'41'' W.; to lat. 42[deg]54'24''
N., long. 115[deg]56'47'' W.; to lat. 43[deg]00'12'' N., long.
116[deg]04'42'' W.; to lat. 43[deg]06'51'' N., long. 116[deg]01'24''
W.; to lat. 43[deg]09'22'' N., long. 115[deg]57'57'' W.; to lat.
43[deg]12'54'' N., long. 115[deg]42'51'' W., thence to point of
beginning.

    That airspace extending upward from 1,200 feet above the surface
bounded by a line beginning at lat. 43[deg]33'06'' N., long.
116[deg]11'32'' W.; to lat. 42[deg]48'43'' N., long. 115[deg]00'21''
W.; to lat. 42[deg]23'58'' N., long. 115[deg]00'21'' W.; to lat.
42[deg]23'58'' N., long. 115[deg]17'55'' W.; thence clockwise along
the 46.0-mile radius of Mountain Home AFB to lat. 43[deg]09'20'' N.,
long. 116[deg]54'22'' W.; thence to point of beginning.

    Issued in Seattle, Washington, on July 20, 2015.
Christopher Ramirez,
Manager, Operations Support Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2015-18338 Filed 7-27-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 32 (Tuesday, February 18, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9085-9086]
[FR Doc No: 2014-03470]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 100

[Docket No. USCG-2013-1067]

Special Local Regulation; Southern California Annual Marine
Events for the San Diego Captain of the Port Zone

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the special local regulations in
33 CFR 100.1101 during the California Half Ironman Triathlon, held on
March 29, 2014. This event occurs in Oceanside Harbor, Oceanside, CA.
These special local regulations are necessary to provide for the safety
of the participants, crew, spectators, sponsor vessels of the
triathlon, and general users of the waterway. During the enforcement
period, persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within this regulated area unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 6:40 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. on March 29,
2014.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this notice,
call or email Petty Officer Bryan Gollogly, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the special
local regulations in 33 CFR 100.1101 in support of the annual marine
event, the California Half Ironman Triathlon (Item 2 on Table 1 of 33
CFR 100.1101), held

on the last Saturday morning in March. The Coast Guard will enforce the
special local regulations on the Harbor and Federal Channel in
Oceanside on March 29, 2014 from 6:40 a.m. to 9:30 a.m. The triathlon
course will commence at the Oceanside Harbor boat ramp then proceed
outbound through the federal channel to the Oceanside Harbor Entrance,
and then proceed back through the channel to the boat ramp.
    Under the provisions of 33 CFR 100.1101, persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this regulated area unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative. The Coast Guard may be assisted by other
Federal, State, or local law enforcement agencies in enforcing this
regulation.
    This notice is issued under authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 33 CFR
100.1101. In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the Coast
Guard will provide the maritime community with advance notification of
this enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners and local
advertising by the event sponsor.
    If the Captain of the Port Sector San Diego or his designated
representative determines that the regulated area need not be enforced
for the full duration stated on this notice, he or she may use a
Broadcast Notice to Mariners or other communications coordinated by the
event sponsor to grant general permission to enter the regulated area.

    Dated: January 13, 2014.
S.M. Mahoney,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2014-03470 Filed 2-14-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: July 22, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 141)]
[Notices]
[Page 42558-42559]
[DOCID:fr22jy08-35]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

 [Docket No. ER08-1225-000]

Cloud County Wind Farm; Supplemental Notice That Initial Market-
Based Rate Filing Includes Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization

July 14, 2008.
    This is a supplemental notice in the above-referenced proceeding of
Cloud County Wind Farm, LLC's application

for market-based rate authority, with an accompanying rate schedule,
noting that such application includes a request for blanket
authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities
and assumptions of liability.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest should file with the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and Sec.
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a
copy of that document on the Applicant.
    Notice is hereby given that the deadline for filing protests with
regard to the applicant's request for blanket authorization, under 18
CFR part 34, of future issuances of securities and assumptions of
liability, is July 31, 2008.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the FERC Online links at http://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic service, persons with Internet
access who will eFile a document and/or be listed as a contact for an
intervenor must create and validate an eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
    Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and
14 copies of the intervention or protest to the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First St., NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    The filings in the above-referenced proceeding are accessible in
the Commission's eLibrary system by clicking on the appropriate link in
the above list.
    They are also available for review in the Commission's Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the
Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail notification when a
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any
FERC Online service, please e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-16710 Filed 7-21-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: April 13, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 70)]
[Notices]
[Page 18828-18829]
[DOCID:fr13ap10-44]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL10-58-000]

PSEG Power Connecticut LLC, Complainant v. ISO New England Inc.,
Respondent; Notice of Complaint

April 6, 2010.
    Take notice that on April 2, 2010, pursuant to section 206 of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206 (2009) and section 206 of the Federal
Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824(e) (2000), PSEG Power Connecticut LLC
(Complainant) filed a formal complaint against ISO New England Inc.
(Respondent) challenging the justness and reasonableness of the
Respondent's actions to limit the Capacity Network Resource Capability
ratings of capacity resources owned by the Complainant.
    The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served
on the contacts for the Respondent as listed on

the Commission's List of Corporate Officials.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://
www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on April 22, 2010.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-8352 Filed 4-12-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P