[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 182 (Friday, September 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 58358-58359]
[FR Doc No: 2020-20608]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-9052-9]

Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General
Information<PHONE_NUMBER> or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed September 4, 2020 10 a.m. EST Through September 14, 2020 10 a.m.
EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice

    Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public
its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's comment
letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxnodengn.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20200181, Draft, USACE, WA, Chehalis River Basin Flood Damage
Reduction Project, Comment Period Ends: 11/17/2020, Contact: Brandon
Clinton<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    EIS No. 20200182, Final, USFS, AZ, Fossil Creek Wild and Scenic
River Comprehensive River Management Plan, Review Period Ends: 11/02/
2020, Contact: Mike Dechter<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    EIS No. 20200183, Final, BR, CA, Friant-Kern Canal Middle Reach
Capacity Correction Project Final Environmental Impact Statement/
Environmental Impact Report, Review Period Ends: 10/19/2020, Contact:
Rain Emerson<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    EIS No. 20200184, Final Supplement, USN, WA, Northwest Training and
Testing Activities Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement/
Overseas Environmental Impact Statement, Review Period Ends: 10/19/
2020, Contact: Jacqueline Queen<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    EIS No. 20200185, Final, USFS, ID, Hungry Ridge Restoration
Project, Review Period Ends: 10/19/2020, Contact: Jennie Fischer 208-
983-4048.
    EIS No. 20200186, Final, NPS, CA, Point Reyes National Seashore
General Management Plan Amendment, Review Period Ends: 10/19/2020,
Contact: Carey Feierabend<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    EIS No. 20200187, Draft, NPS, NC, Cape Hatteras National Seashore

Sediment Management Framework Draft Environmental Impact Statement,
Comment Period Ends: 11/02/2020, Contact: David Hallac<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Amended Notice

    EIS No. 20200161, Draft Supplement, BR, CA, Shasta Lake Water
Resources Investigation, Comment Period Ends: 10/05/2020, Contact:
David Brick<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Revision to FR Notice Published 8/7/2020; Extending the Comment
Period from 9/21/2020 to 10/5/2020.

    Dated: September 14, 2020.
Cindy S. Barger,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2020-20608 Filed 9-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 81 (Thursday, April 26, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18373-18374]
[FR Doc No: 2018-08817]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Proposed Collection; Comment Request

    Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA

Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-2736.

Extension:
    Form 1-K, SEC File No. 270-662, OMB Control No. 3235-0720.

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the collection of
information summarized below. The Commission plans to submit this
existing collection of information to the Office of Management and
Budget for extension and approval.
    Form 1-K (17 CFR 239.91) is used to file annual reports by Tier 2
issuers under Regulation A, an exemption from registration under the
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et seq.). Tier 2 issuers under
Regulation A conducting offerings of up to $50 million within a 12-
month period are required to file Form 1-K. Form 1-K provides audited
year-end financial statements and information about the issuer's
business operation, ownership, management, liquidity, capital resources
and operations on an annual basis. In addition, Part I of the Form 1-K
collects information on any offerings under Regulation A that have been
terminated or completed unless it has been previous reported on Form 1-
Z. The purpose of the Form 1-K is to better inform the public about
companies that have conducted Tier 2 offerings under Regulation A. We
estimate that approximately 24 issuers file Form 1-K annually. We
estimate that Form 1-K takes approximately 600 hours to prepare. We
estimate that 75% of the 600 hours per response (450 hours) is prepared
by the company for a total annual burden of 10,800 hours (450.0 hours
per response x 24 responses).
    Written comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden imposed by the collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected;
and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology. Consideration will
be given to comments and suggestions submitted in writing within 60
days of this publication.
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Please direct your written comments to Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549; or send an email
to: [email protected].

    Dated: April 23, 2018.
Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-08817 Filed 4-25-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


? Need to return call by / at/ between and . Signature: Project No.: 0<IP_ADDRESS> DISTRIBUTION Page __ 1_ of _ 1_

Project Name: 304( g) Review TELEPHONE CALL RECORD Outgoing Call Date: 11/ 9/ 04 Time: 3.00p. m.

Company Name: Quebecor World Atglen Division Phone No.: 610 593 1419 Contact Name: Audrey Okemo Phone No.: 703 633 1629 Name: Diane Potts Eastern Research Group, Inc.

GENERAL SUBJECT : Copper in Wastewater Discharges from the Printing and Publishing Industry TOPICS DISCUSSED AND ACTION TAKEN I called Ms. Diane Potts to discuss the sources of copper in printing and publishing wastewater discharges. Quebecor World Atglen Division is one of the top 5 copper dischargers based on information from the TRI database.

Ms. Potts explained that copper is released into wastewater discharge primarily from the copper and chrome plating baths. Quebecor plates their own printing cyldinders. She also informed me that concentrations of copper in the wastewater are measured via lab analysis of actual wastewater samples.

Ms. Potts estimated wastewater discharges from the metals pretreatment system to be approximately 2,000 gallons per week; and from the entire plant to be 25,000 gallons per day. Due to the high wastewater volume from the entire plant, the copper concentration in the pretreatment effluent gets significantly diluted.

Quebecor performs rotogravure and lithographic offset printing.


MEMORANDUM To: Electronic Docket No. 2002 0056 From: William H. Maxwell Date: January 30. 2004 Subject: Interagency Review Materials to be Added to the Docket After Proposal The EPA received a significant number of comments on the draft notice of proposed rulemaking for the proposed utility mercury and nickel regulations during the interagency review process. Many of these comments were handwritten notations on the draft of the proposal package originally submitted to the Office of Management and Budget for review. Others were electronicmail messages from various participants in the interagency review process. Due to the large volume of comments received, EPA was unable to submit all of the comments to the docket prior to publication of the proposed rule. The EPA's inability to submit all of the comments in a timely manner was due to a combination of factors. The delay resulted primarily from the governmentwide change to an exclusively electronic docket. As a result of this change, documents may only be submitted to a rulemaking docket in electronic format. As a result, rather than merely submitting documents received in hard copy format directly to the docket, as has been the practice in the past, all such documents must now be converted to electronic format prior to submission to the docket. The EPA was unable to convert the large volume of comments received in hard copy format to electronic format prior to publication of the proposed rule. In addition to problems arising as a result of the conversion to an exclusively electronic docket, EPA has been diligently working on a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking which is an integral part of the proposed rule. As a result of the time pressures associated with this effort , EPA was unable to assemble and submit all of the interagency comments received in electronic format prior to publication of the proposal. The EPA determined that it will better serve the public interest to submit all of the interagency comments at the same time, rather than submitting only a subset of these documents prior to publication of the proposed rule. As a result, EPA only included in the docket a document in redline/ strikeout format which reflects all of the changes made during the interagency review process as of the date of publication of the proposed rule. The EPA intends to submit all of the comments received during the interagency review process to the docket as expeditiously as practicable. If there are any questions regarding any of these materials prior to their inclusion in the docket, interested parties should contact William H. Maxwell at 919 541 5430.