[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 59 (Monday, March 28, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17174-17176]
[FR Doc No: 2011-7181]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-64108; File No. SR-Phlx-2011-35]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change by NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC To Extend
the FLEX No Minimum Value Pilot Program

March 22, 2011.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 \2\ thereunder, notice is hereby given
that on March 15, 2011, NASDAQ OMX PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC'' or
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange is filing with the Commission a proposal to extend a
pilot program that eliminates minimum value sizes for FLEX index
options and FLEX equity options (together known as ``FLEX
Options'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ In addition to FLEX Options, FLEX currency options are also
traded on the Exchange. These flexible index, equity, and currency
options provide investors the ability to customize basic option
features including size, expiration date, exercise style, and
certain exercise prices; and may have expiration dates within five
years. See Rule 1079. FLEX currency options traded on the Exchange
are also known as FLEX World Currency Options (``WCO'') or Foreign
Currency Options (``FCO''). The pilot program discussed herein does
not encompass FLEX currency options.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange requests that the Commission waive the 30-day
operative delay period contained in Exchange Act Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii).\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
Web site at http://nasdaqomxphlx.cchwallstreet.com/NASDAQOMXPHLX/Filings/, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend Phlx Rule 1079
(FLEX Index, Equity and Currency Options) to extend a pilot program
that eliminates minimum value sizes for FLEX Options (the ``Pilot
Program'' or ``Pilot'').
    Rule 1079 deals with the process of listing and trading FLEX
equity, index, and currency options on the Exchange. Rule 1079(a)(8)(A)
currently sets the minimum opening transaction value size in the case
of a FLEX Option in a newly established (opening) series if there is no
open interest in the particular series when an Request-for-Quote
(``RFQ'') is submitted (except as provided in Commentary .01 to Rule
1079): (i) $10 million underlying equivalent value, respecting FLEX
market index options, and $5 million underlying equivalent value
respecting FLEX industry index options; \5\ (ii) the lesser of 250
contracts or the number of contracts overlying $1 million in the
underlying securities, with respect to FLEX equity options (together
the ``minimum value size'').\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Market index options and industry index options are broad-
based index options and narrow-based index options, respectively.
See Rule 1000A(b)(11) and (12).
    \6\ Subsection (a)(8)(A) also provides a third alternative:
(iii) 50 contracts in the case of FLEX currency options. However,
this alternative is not part of the Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Presently, Commentary .01 to Rule 1079 states that by virtue of the
Pilot Program ending March 28, 2011, there shall be no minimum value
size requirements for FLEX Options as noted

in subsections (a)(8)(A)(i) and (a)(8)(A)(ii) above.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62900 (September 13,
2010), 75 FR 57098 (September 17, 2010)(SR-Phlx-2010-123) (notice of
filing and immediate effectiveness of proposal to institute Pilot
Program).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange now proposes to extend the Pilot Program for a period
of one year ending March 30, 2012.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ The Exchange notes that any positions established under this
Pilot would not be impacted by the expiration of the Pilot. For
example, a 10-contract FLEX equity option opening position that
overlies less than $1 million in the underlying security and expires
in January 2015 could be established during the Pilot. If the Pilot
Program were not extended, the position would continue to exist and
any further trading in the series would be subject to the minimum
value size requirements for continued trading in that series.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that there is sufficient investor interest
and demand in the Pilot Program to warrant extension for an additional
year. The Exchange believes that the Pilot Program has provided
investors with additional means of managing their risk exposures and
carrying out their investment objectives. Extension of the Pilot
Program would continue to provide greater opportunities for traders and
investors to manage risk through the use of FLEX Options, including
investors that may otherwise trade in the unregulated over the counter
(``OTC'') market where similar size restrictions do not apply.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ The Exchange has not experienced any adverse market effects
with respect to the Pilot Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In support of the proposed extension of the Pilot Program, the
Exchange has submitted to the Commission a Pilot Program Report
(``Report'') that provides an analysis of the Pilot Program covering
the period during which the Pilot has been in effect. This Report
includes: (i) data and analysis on the open interest and trading volume
in (a) FLEX equity options that have an opening transaction with a
minimum size of 0 to 249 contracts and less than $1 million in
underlying value; (b) FLEX index options that have an opening
transaction with a minimum opening size of less than $10 million in
underlying equivalent value; and (ii) analysis of the types of
investors that initiated opening FLEX Options transactions (i.e.,
institutional, high net worth, or retail). The Report has been
submitted to the Commission on a confidential basis.
    If, in the future, the Exchange proposes an additional extension of
the Pilot Program, or should the Exchange propose to make the Pilot
Program permanent, the Exchange will submit, along with any filing
proposing such amendments to the Pilot Program, an additional Pilot
Program Report covering the period during which the Pilot Program was
in effect and including the details referenced in the prior paragraph.
The Exchange will also provide the nominal dollar value of each trade.
The Pilot Program Report would be submitted to the Commission at least
two months prior to the expiration date of the Pilot Program and would
be provided on a confidential basis.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act \10\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act \11\ in particular, in that it is designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just
and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in
securities, and to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of
a free and open market and a national market system. Specifically, the
Exchange believes that the proposed extension of the Pilot Program,
which eliminates the minimum value size applicable to FLEX Options,
would provide greater opportunities for investors to manage risk
through the use of FLEX Options. The Exchange notes that it has not
experienced any adverse market effects with respect to the Pilot
Program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \12\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\13\
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) (iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \14\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\15\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has
requested that the Commission waive the 30-day operative delay to
permit the current pilot to continue uninterrupted. The Commission
finds that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. The Commission notes
in waiving the 30-day operative delay that Phlx's original pilot was
published for comment in the Federal Register and that the Commission
did not receive any comments on the proposed rule change.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires that a self-regulatory organization submit to the
Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule
change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule
change, at least five business days prior to the filing of the
proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Commission notes that the Exchange has satisfied
this requirement.
    \15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
    \16\ See note 7, supra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, Phlx is proposing to extend the existing pilots on the
same terms and conditions as they were originally approved by the
Commission. This includes, as described in more detail above, a
representation that Phlx will continue to monitor the pilot and submit
certain interim reports during the extended pilot period, as well as a
final report covering the pilot period should the Exchange decide to
extend or file for permanent approval of the pilot. Finally, the
Commission notes that the Exchange has represented that it has not
experienced any adverse market effects with respect to the pilot
program.
    Based on the above, the Commission finds that it is consistent with
investor protection and the public interest to waive the 30-day
operative delay in accordance with Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) so that the
pilot can continue on an uninterrupted basis, and therefore

designates the proposal operative upon filing.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-Phlx-2011-35 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-Phlx-2011-35. This file
number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File No. SR-Phlx-2011-35 and should be
submitted on or before April 18, 2011.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cathy H. Ahn,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-7181 Filed 3-25-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 201 (Thursday, October 21, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 58367]
[FR Doc No: 2021-22925]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-93346; File No. SR-PEARL-2021-32]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of
Withdrawal of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX Pearl Options
Fee Schedule To Remove Certain Credits and Increase Trading Permit Fees

October 15, 2021.
    On July 1, 2021, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX Pearl'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change to amend the MIAX Pearl Options Fee Schedule to
remove certain credits and increase monthly Trading Permit fees for
Exchange Members. The proposed rule change was immediately effective
upon filing with the Commission pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act.\3\ On July 15, 2021, the proposed rule change was published for
comment in the Federal Register.\4\ On August 27, 2021, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(C) of the Act, the Commission: (1) Temporarily
suspended the proposed rule change; and (2) instituted proceedings to
determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposal.\5\ The
Commission received one comment letter on the proposal.\6\ On October
12, 2021, the Exchange withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-PEARL-
2021-32).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92366 (July 9,
2021), 86 FR 37379.
    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 92797, 86 FR 49399
(September 2, 2021).
    \6\ See Letter from Richard J. McDonald, Susquehanna
International Group, LLP, to Vanessa Countryman, Secretary,
Commission, dated September 28, 2021, available at: https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-pearl-2021-32/srpearl202132-9295793-259789.pdf.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57) and (58).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-22925 Filed 10-20-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 57 (Tuesday, March 25, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16326-16327]
[FR Doc No: 2014-06548]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9908-74-OA]

EPA Science Advisory Board; Notification of a Public
Teleconference and Meeting of the Science Advisory Board Chemical
Assessment Advisory Committee Augmented for the Review of EPA's Draft
Ammonia Assessment

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science Advisory
Board (SAB) Staff Office announces two meetings of the Chemical
Assessment Advisory Committee Augmented for the Review of the Draft
Ammonia Assessment (CAAC-Ammonia Panel). A public teleconference will
be held to discuss the charge questions, to learn about the development
of the agency's draft Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS)
Toxicological Review of Ammonia (August 2013 Revised External Review
Draft), and to learn about the Health and Environment Research Online
(HERO) database prior to a face-to-face meeting that will be held in
Arlington, VA. The purpose of the face-to-face meeting is to receive a
briefing on the EPA's enhancements to the IRIS Program, including the
process for developing IRIS assessments, and to conduct a peer review
of the Agency's draft IRIS Toxicological Review of Ammonia (August 2013
Revised External Review Draft).

DATES: The public teleconference will be held on June 4, 2014, from
1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time). The public face-to-face meeting
will be held on July 14--July 16, 2014. A briefing on the EPA's
enhancements to the IRIS Program will be held on July 14, 2014 from
9:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. The peer review of the Agency's draft IRIS
Toxicological Review of Ammonia (August 2013 Revised External Review
Draft) will commence on July 14, 2014 from 1:15 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.
(Eastern Time). The peer review will continue on July 15-16, 2014, from
8:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. (Eastern Time).

ADDRESSES: The public teleconference will be conducted by telephone
only. The public face-to-face meeting will be held at the Crowne Plaza
Washington National Airport, 1480 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Any member of the public who wants
further information concerning these public meetings may contact Dr.
Sue Shallal, Designated Federal Officer (DFO) for the CAAC-Ammonia
Panel, by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or via email at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>General information concerning the EPA SAB can
be found at http://www.epa.gov/sab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The SAB was established pursuant to the
Environmental Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization
Act (ERDDAA), codified at 42 U.S.C. 4365, to provide independent
scientific and technical advice to the Administrator on the technical
basis for Agency positions and regulations. The SAB is a Federal
Advisory Committee chartered under the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(FACA), 5 U.S.C., App. 2. The SAB will comply with the provisions of
FACA and all appropriate SAB Staff Office procedural policies. Pursuant
to FACA and EPA policy, notice is hereby given that the SAB CAAC-
Ammonia Panel will hold a public teleconference and public face-to-face
meeting. The purpose of the teleconference is to discuss the charge
questions, to learn about the development of the agency's draft IRIS
Toxicological Review of Ammonia (August 2013 Revised External Review
Draft) and learn about the EPA's Health and Environmental Research
Online (HERO) database. The purposes of the face-to-face meeting are to
receive a briefing on the EPA's enhancements to the IRIS Program,
including the process for developing IRIS assessments, and to conduct a
peer review of the EPA's draft IRIS assessment of ammonia. This SAB
panel will provide advice to the Administrator through the chartered
SAB.
    Background: EPA's Office of Research and Development requested that
the SAB conduct a peer review of the draft IRIS Toxicological Review of
Ammonia

(August 2013 Revised External Review Draft). The EPA SAB Staff Office
augmented the SAB CAAC with subject matter experts to provide advice
through the chartered SAB regarding this IRIS assessment. The SAB CAAC-
Ammonia Review Panel was scheduled to meet on February 18-20, 2014 to
conduct a peer review of the draft IRIS assessment of ammonia (79
Federal Register 5400-5402). To allow more time for the public to
prepare for the meeting, the agency asked the SAB to reschedule its
February meeting. Additional information about this advisory activity,
including, the formation of the SAB CAAC-Ammonia Review Panel, can be
found at the following URL: http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/fedrgstr_activites/IRIS%20Ammonia?OpenDocument.
    A meeting agenda and other meeting materials will be posted at the
above noted URL prior to the meeting.
    Technical Contacts: Any technical questions concerning EPA's draft
IRIS assessment of ammonia should be directed to Dr. Samantha Jones by
telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Availability of Meeting Materials: Prior to the meeting, the review
documents, agenda and other materials will be accessible through the
calendar link on the blue navigation bar at http://www.epa.gov/sab/.
Materials may also be accessed at the following SAB Web page http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/fedrgstr_activites/IRIS%20Ammonia?OpenDocument.
    Procedures for Providing Public Input: Public comment for
consideration by EPA's federal advisory committees and panels has a
different purpose from public comment provided to EPA program offices.
Therefore, the process for submitting comments to a federal advisory
committee is different from the process used to submit comments to an
EPA program office. Federal advisory committees and panels, including
scientific advisory committees, provide independent advice to the EPA.
Interested members of the public may submit relevant information on the
topic of this advisory activity, and/or the group conducting the
activity, for the SAB to consider during the advisory process. Input
from the public to the SAB will have the most impact if it provides
specific scientific or technical information or analysis for SAB
committees and panels to consider or if it relates to the clarity or
accuracy of the technical information. Members of the public wishing to
provide comment should contact the DFO directly. Oral Statements: In
general, individuals or groups requesting an oral presentation on the
teleconference will be limited to three minutes and oral presentations
at the face-to-face meeting will be limited to five minutes. Interested
parties wishing to provide comments should contact Dr. Sue Shallal,
DFO, in writing (preferably via email) at the contact information noted
above by May 27, 2014 to be placed on the list of public speakers for
the teleconference and by July 7, 2014 to be placed on the list of
public speakers for the face-to-face meeting.
    Written Statements: Written statements will be accepted throughout
the advisory process; however, for timely consideration by Committee/
Panel members, statements should be supplied to the DFO via email at
the contact information noted above at least one week prior to a public
meeting. Written statements should be supplied in one of the following
electronic formats: Adobe Acrobat PDF, MS Word, MS PowerPoint, or Rich
Text files in IBM-PC/Windows 98/2000/XP format. It is the SAB Staff
Office general policy to post written comments on the Web page for the
advisory meeting or teleconference. Submitters are requested to provide
an unsigned version of each document because the SAB Staff Office does
not publish documents with signatures on its Web sites. Members of the
public should be aware that their personal contact information, if
included in any written comments, may be posted to the SAB Web site.
Copyrighted material will not be posted without explicit permission of
the copyright holder.
    Accessibility: For information on access or services for
individuals with disabilities, please contact Dr. Sue Shallal at (202)
564-2057 or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To request accommodation of a
disability, please contact Dr. Shallal preferably at least ten days
prior to the meeting to give EPA as much time as possible to process
your request.

    Dated: March 18, 2014.
 Thomas H. Brennan,
Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-06548 Filed 3-24-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P