[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 68 (Thursday, April 9, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19013-19017]
[FR Doc No: 2015-06785]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0627; Directorate Identifier 2013-NM-217-AD;
Amendment 39-18126; AD 2015-06-08]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2011-09-03 for
all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and 382G airplanes. AD 2011-09-03 required
repetitive eddy current inspections to detect cracks in the center wing
upper and lower rainbow fittings, and corrective actions if necessary;
and repetitive replacement of rainbow fittings, which would extend the
repetitive interval for the next inspection. This new AD requires
reduced intervals for inspections of the upper rainbow fittings. This
AD was prompted by analysis of in-service cracking, which has shown
that a reduction in the inspection intervals is necessary for the upper
rainbow fittings. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the upper and lower rainbow fittings on the center wings,
which could grow large and lead to the failure of the fitting and a
catastrophic failure of the center wing.

DATES: This AD is effective May 14, 2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of May 14,
2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain other publication listed in this AD as of May
26, 2011 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011).

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company,
Airworthiness

Office, Dept. 6A0M, Zone 0252, Column P-58, 86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta,
GA 30063; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/TechPubs.html. You may view this referenced service information at the
FAA, Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221. It is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0627.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-
0627; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl Gray, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft Certification Office
(ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; phone: 404-474-
5554; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311,
April 21, 2011). AD 2011-09-03 applied to all Lockheed Martin
Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E,
382F, and 382G airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on
September 17, 2014 (79 FR 55675). The NPRM was prompted by analysis of
in-service cracking, which has shown that the initial and repetitive
inspection schedules for the upper rainbow fitting need to be revised
to reduce the probability of failure until the rainbow fitting is
replaced. The NPRM proposed to continue to require repetitive eddy
current inspections to detect cracks in the center wing upper and lower
rainbow fittings, and corrective actions if necessary; and repetitive
replacement of rainbow fittings, which would extend the repetitive
interval for the next inspection. This AD reduces compliance times for
initial and repetitive inspections of the upper rainbow fitting. We are
issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue cracking of the upper and
lower rainbow fittings on the center wings, which could grow large and
lead to the failure of the fitting and a catastrophic failure of the
center wing.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no comments on the NPRM (79 FR 55675, September
17, 2014) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 55675, September 17, 2014) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 55675, September 17, 2014).

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin
382-57-82, Revision 6, including Appendixes A, B, and C, dated July 11,
2013. The service information describes procedures for repetitive eddy
current inspections of the upper and lower rainbow fittings of the
center wing; repetitive replacement of the upper and lower rainbow
fittings; and related investigative and corrective actions. This
service information is reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for ways to
access this service information.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 14 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We estimate the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                                 Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost on U.S.
             Action                   Labor cost          Parts cost       Cost per product        operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Inspection of upper and lower     20 work-hours x     None..............  $1,700, per         $23,800, per
 fitting [retained actions from    $85 per hour =                          inspection cycle.   inspection cycle.
 AD 2011[dash]09[dash]03,          $1,700 per
 Amendment 39[dash]16665 (76 FR    inspection cycle.
 22311, April 21, 2011)].
Fitting replacement [retained     2,438 work-hours x  $40,000...........  $247,230, per       $3,461,220, per
 actions from AD                   $85 per hour =                          replacement.        replacement.
 2011[dash]09[dash]03, Amendment   $207,230 per
 39[dash]16665 (76 FR 22311,       replacement.
 April 21, 2011)].
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    This AD reduces the compliance times for the upper rainbow fitting
inspections and adds no additional economic burden.

Authority for this Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,

or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), and
adding the following new AD:

2015-06-08 Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics
Company: Amendment 39-18126; Docket No. FAA-2014-0627; Directorate
Identifier 2013-NM-217-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD is effective May 14, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD replaces AD 2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311,
April 21, 2011).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to all Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Model 382, 382B, 382E, 382F, and 382G
airplanes, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 57, Wings.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by an analysis of in-service cracking that
has shown that the rainbow fittings are susceptible to multiple site
fatigue damage. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct fatigue
cracking of the upper and lower rainbow fittings on the center
wings, which could grow large and lead to the failure of the fitting
and a catastrophic failure of the center wing.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Retained Initial Inspections

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (g) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with
revised service information. Except as required by paragraph (m) of
this AD, at the later of the times specified in paragraphs (g)(1)
and (g)(2) of this AD: Do eddy current inspections to detect
cracking of the center wing upper and lower rainbow fittings on the
left and right side of the airplane. Do the actions in accordance
with the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin
382-57-82, Revision 4, including Appendixes A and B, dated May 20,
2009; or Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382-
57-82, Revision 6, including Appendixes A and B, dated July 11,
2013. If any crack is found during the inspections required by this
paragraph, before further flight, do the actions required by
paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing the requirements of paragraph (m) of
this AD terminates the requirements of this paragraph for the
affected upper rainbow fitting only. As of the effective date of
this AD, only use Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service
Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 6, including Appendixes A and B, dated
July 11, 2013, for accomplishing the actions specified in this
paragraph.
    (1) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight hours on the
rainbow fitting.
    (2) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours on the rainbow fitting
after May 26, 2011, (the effective date of AD 2011-09-03, Amendment
39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011)), whichever occurs first.

(h) Retained Repetitive Inspection Schedule

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (h) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with a
new exception. Except as required by paragraph (n) of this AD,
repeat the inspection required by paragraph (g) of this AD at
intervals not to exceed 3,600 flight hours on the center wing, until
the rainbow fitting has accumulated 30,000 total flight hours. If
any crack is found during the inspections required by this
paragraph, before further flight, do the actions required by
paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing the requirements of paragraph (n) of
this AD terminates the requirements of this paragraph for the
affected upper rainbow fitting only.

(i) Retained Rainbow Fitting Replacements

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (i) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with
revised service information. Before the accumulation of 30,000
flight hours on the rainbow fitting, or within 600 flight hours
after May 26, 2011, (the effective date of AD 2011-09-03, Amendment
39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011)), whichever occurs later:
Replace the rainbow fitting with a new rainbow fitting, do all
related investigative actions, and do all applicable corrective
actions, in accordance with paragraph 2.C. of the Accomplishment
Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 4,
including Appendix C, dated May 20, 2009, except as required by
paragraph (l) of this AD; or Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 6, including Appendix C, dated
July 11, 2013, except as required by paragraph (l) of this AD.
Replace the rainbow fitting thereafter at intervals not to exceed
30,000 flight hours. As of the effective date of this AD, only use
Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382-57-82,
Revision 6, including Appendix C, dated July 11, 2013, for
accomplishing the actions specified in this paragraph.

(j) Retained Post-Replacement Repetitive Inspections

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (j) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with a
new exception. For upper and lower rainbow fittings replaced in
accordance with paragraph (i) or (k) of this AD: Except as required
by paragraph (o) of this AD, do the eddy current inspections
specified in paragraph (g) of this AD within 15,000 flight hours
after doing the replacement and repeat the eddy current inspections
specified in paragraph (h) of this AD thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 3,600 flight hours until the rainbow fittings are replaced in
accordance with paragraph (i) or (k) of this AD. Doing the
requirements of paragraph (o) of this AD terminates the requirements
of this paragraph for the affected upper rainbow fitting only.

(k) Retained Replacement, Related Investigative Actions, and Corrective
Actions

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (k) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with
revised service information and revised references to inspection
paragraphs. If, during any inspection required by paragraph (g),
(h), (m), or (n) of this AD, any crack is detected in the rainbow
fitting, before further flight, replace the rainbow fitting with a
new rainbow fitting, do all related investigative actions, and do
all applicable corrective actions, in accordance with Paragraph 2.C.
of the Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-
57-82, Revision 4, including Appendix C, dated May 20, 2009, except
as provided by paragraph (l) of this AD; or Lockheed Martin
Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 6,
including Appendix C, dated July 11, 2013, except as required by
paragraph (l) of this AD. As of the effective date of this AD, only
use Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382-57-82,
Revision 6, including Appendix C, dated July 11, 2013, for
accomplishing the actions specified in this paragraph.

(l) Retained Exceptions to Service Information

    This paragraph restates the requirements of paragraph (l) of AD
2011-09-03, Amendment

39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011), with revised service
information. Where Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 4,
including Appendixes A, B, and C, dated May 20, 2009; or Lockheed
Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 6,
including Appendixes A, B, and C, dated July 11, 2013; specifies to
contact the manufacturer for disposition of certain repair
conditions or does not specify corrective actions if certain
conditions are found, this AD requires repairing those conditions
using a method approved by the Manager, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), FAA. For a repair method to be approved
by the Manager, Atlanta ACO, as required by this paragraph, the
Manager's approval letter must specifically refer to this AD.

(m) New Requirement: Reduced Initial Compliance Time for Upper Rainbow
Fittings

    At the applicable compliance time specified in paragraphs (m)(1)
and (m)(2) of this AD, do eddy current inspections to detect
cracking of the center wing upper rainbow fittings on the left and
right side of the airplane. Do the actions in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company
Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 6, including Appendixes A and
B, dated July 11, 2013. If any crack is found during the inspections
required by this paragraph, before further flight, do the actions
required by paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing the requirements of this
paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (g) of this AD
for that upper rainbow fitting only. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at the interval required by paragraph (n) of this AD.
    (1) For upper rainbow fittings that have accumulated less than
10,000 total flight hours as of the effective date of this AD, the
compliance time is at the later of the times in paragraphs (m)(1)(i)
and (m)(1)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Before the accumulation of 10,000 total flight hours.
    (ii) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
    (2) For upper rainbow fittings that have accumulated 10,000
total flight hours or more, but less than 15,000 total flight hours
as of the effective date of this AD, the compliance time is the
earlier of the times specified in paragraphs (m)(2)(i) and
(m)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first.
    (ii) Before the accumulation of 15,000 total flight hours on the
rainbow fitting.

(n) New Requirement: Reduced Repetitive Inspection Intervals

    For upper rainbow fittings on which the requirements of
paragraph (g), (h), or (m) of this AD were done, do the next
inspection at the earlier of the times required in paragraphs (n)(1)
and (n)(2) of this AD. Thereafter, repeat the inspection required by
paragraph (m) of this AD at intervals not to exceed 2,500 flight
hours until the upper rainbow fitting has accumulated 30,000 total
flight hours. If any crack is found during the inspections required
by this paragraph, before further flight, do the actions required by
paragraph (k) of this AD. Doing an inspection required by this
paragraph terminates the requirements of paragraph (h) of this AD
for the affected upper rainbow fitting only.
    (1) Within 3,600 flight hours since the last inspection done in
accordance with paragraph (g), (h), or (m) of this AD, whichever
occurs latest.
    (2) At the later of the times specified in paragraphs (n)(2)(i)
and (n)(2)(ii) of this AD.
    (i) Within 2,500 flight hours after the last inspection done in
accordance with paragraph (g), (h), or (m) of this AD, whichever
occurs latest.
    (ii) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.

(o) New Requirement: Reduced Post-Replacement Repetitive Inspections

    For upper rainbow fittings replaced in accordance with paragraph
(i) or (k) of this AD, do the inspection required by paragraph (m)
of this AD at the earlier of the compliance times required in
paragraph (o)(1) and (o)(2) of this AD. Repeat the inspection
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 2,500 flight hours. Doing the
inspections required by this paragraph terminates the requirements
of paragraph (j) of this AD for the affected upper rainbow fitting
only.
    (1) At the later of the times in paragraphs (o)(1)(i) and
(o)(1)(ii) of this AD. (i) Within 10,000 total flight hours on the
upper rainbow fitting.
    (ii) Within 365 days or 600 flight hours after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first.
    (2) Within 15,000 total flight hours on the upper rainbow
fitting.

(p) Credit for Previous Actions

    The service information identified in paragraphs (p)(1)(i),
(p)(1)(ii), (p)(1)(iii), (p)(2), and (p)(3) is not incorporated by
reference in this AD.
    (1) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j), and (k) of this AD, if those actions
were performed before the effective date of this AD using the
service information identified in paragraphs (p)(1)(i), (p)(1)(ii),
and (p)(1)(iii) of this AD.
    (i) Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, including Appendixes A
and B, dated December 7, 2004.
    (ii) Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 1, including
Appendixes A and B, dated February 24, 2005.
    (iii) Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 2, including
Appendixes A and B, dated February 15, 2007.
    (2) This paragraph restates paragraph (m) of AD 2011-09-03,
Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011). This paragraph
provides credit for actions required by paragraphs (g), (h), (i),
(j), and (k) of this AD, if those actions were performed before May
26, 2011 (the effective date of AD 2011-09-03), using Lockheed
Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 3, including Appendixes A, B,
and C, dated April 25, 2008.
    (3) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g), (h), (i), (j), (k), (m), (n), and (o) of this AD, if
those actions were performed before the effective date of this AD
using Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 5, including
Appendixes A, B, and C, dated August 12, 2010.

(q) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Atlanta ACO, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
ACO, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph
(r)(2) of this AD.
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
    (3) AMOCs approved for AD 2011-09-03, Amendment 39-16665 (76 FR
22311, April 21, 2011), are approved as AMOCs for the corresponding
provisions of this AD.

(r) Related Information

    (1) For more information about this AD, contact Carl Gray,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA
30337; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    (2) For information about AMOCs, contact Hal Horsbough,
Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ACE-117A, FAA, Atlanta Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1701 Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA
30337; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
(s) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
May 14, 2015.
    (i) Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company Service Bulletin 382-57-
82, Revision 6, including Appendixes A, B, and C, dated July 11,
2013.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
May 26, 2011 (76 FR 22311, April 21, 2011).
    (i) Lockheed Service Bulletin 382-57-82, Revision 4, including
Appendixes A, B, and C, dated May 20, 2009.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Lockheed Martin Corporation/Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company,
Airworthiness Office, Dept. 6A0M,

Zone 0252, Column P-58, 86 S. Cobb Drive, Marietta, GA 30063;
telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet http://www.lockheedmartin.com/ams/tools/TechPubs.html.
    (6) You may view this service information at FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 12, 2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-06785 Filed 4-8-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

------------------------------------------------------------

UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

------------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME

Part 215 of the Department’s Regulations (14 CFR Part 215) provides
that any certificated air carrier wishing to use an alternative trade
name must first register that name with the Department.  The rule
further states that the Department may register such name after the
carrier gives notification of the proposed use of the name to similarly
named carriers.

On December 9, 2003, United Air lines, Inc. filed a request that the
Department register “Ted” as a trade name for use in its operations

After reviewing our files, we have identified no other certificated,
commuter, or foreign air carriers using a name similar to “Ted.”
Under these circumstances, we hereby register “Ted” as a trade name
to be used by United in its certificated air carrier operations.

Dated: December 23, 2003 at Washington, D.C.,

RANDALL D. BENNETT

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

(SEAL)

SERVICE LIST FOR UNITED AIR LINES, INC.

Mr. Bruce H. Rabinovitz

Counsel to United Air Lines, Inc.

Wilmer, Cutler, & Pickering

2445 M Street N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20037-1420

Mr. Dick Dutton, Asst. Manager

Flight Standards Certification

Program Office, AFS-900

Federal Aviation Administration

45005 Aviation Drive, Ste. 203B

Dulles, Virginia 20166-7537

Mr. Peter Lynch, Asst. Chief Counsel

for Enforcement, AGC-300

Federal Aviation Administration

800 Independence Ave., S.W.

Washington, D.C.  20591

Mr. Stokes Anderson, Manager

Certificate Management Field Office

Federal Aviation Administration

26805 E. 68th Avenue, Suite 221

Denver, CO  80249

Mr. Monroe Balton, Regional Counsel

Federal Aviation Administration

Western-Pacific Region HQ (AWP-7)

1500 Aviation Boulevard

Hawthorne, CA  90250

Mr. James Edwards, POI

Certificate Management Field Office

Federal Aviation Administration

26805 E. 68th Avenue, Suite 221

Denver, CO  80249

													 page  3

                           Served: December 30, 2003


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 84 (Thursday, May 1, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24773-24775]
[FR Doc No: 2014-09922]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-72026; File No. SR-NYSE-2014-08]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Adopt the Bond Trading License and
the Bond Liquidity Provider Programs Pursuant to NYSE Rules 87 and 88

April 25, 2014.

I. Introduction

    On February 27, 2014, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change that would provide for a bond trading license
(``BTL'') for member organizations that desire to trade only debt
securities on the Exchange and that would establish a new class of
market participants called bond liquidity providers (``BLPs''). The
proposal was published for comment in the Federal Register on March 14,
2014.\3\ The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This
order approves the proposed rule change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 71671 (March 10,
2014), 79 FR 14558 (March 14, 2014).
    \4\ The Commission notes that it previously approved the
proposed BTL and BLP program on a pilot basis. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 63736 (January 9, 2011), 76 FR 4959
(January 28, 2011) (SR-NYSE-2010-74). The pilot program was
originally scheduled to expire on January 19, 2012, but the
Commission approved two one-year extensions. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 65995 (December 16, 2011), 76 FR 79726 (December 22,
2011) (SR-NYSE-2011-63); Securities Exchange Act Release No. 68533
(December 21, 2012), 77 FR 77166 (December 31, 2012) (SR-NYSE-2011-
63). The pilot program terminated on January 19, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

A. Bond Trading License

    The Exchange proposes to establish a trading license for its member
organizations to trade only debt securities on the Exchange. Generally,
to effect any transaction on the Exchange, a member organization must
obtain a trading license pursuant to NYSE Rule 300. Under proposed NYSE
Rule 87, the Exchange may issue a BTL to any approved member
organization to effectuate bond transactions on the Exchange. The BTL
would not be transferrable and could not be assigned, sublicensed, or
leased.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ The holder of the BTL may, with the Exchange's prior written
consent, transfer the BTL to a qualified and approved member
organization that is an affiliate or that continues substantially
the same business of the BTL holder. See proposed NYSE Rule 87.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Bonds Liquidity Providers

    Proposed NYSE Rule 88 would provide for a class of market
participants called BLPs. The Exchange would provide BLPs with
incentives, in the form of rebates, for quoting and for providing
liquidity with respect to bonds to which they have been assigned.
1. Qualifications
    To qualify as a BLP, an Exchange member organization would have to
demonstrate an ability to meet the quoting requirement described below.
In addition, an Exchange member organization would need to have
mnemonics that identify to the Exchange BLP trading activity in
assigned BLP bonds. Finally, an Exchange member organization would need
to have adequate trading infrastructure and technology to support
electronic trading.
2. Application Process
    To become a BLP, an Exchange member organization would be required
to submit an application form with supporting documentation to the
Exchange. The Exchange would review the application and determine
whether the applicant was qualified to be a BLP. In the event an
applicant were disapproved or disqualified as a BLP, the applicant
could request an appeal or reapply three months after the month in
which the applicant received the disapproval or disqualification notice
from the Exchange.
3. Matching of BLPs and Issuers
    Only one BLP would be assigned with respect to the bonds of a
single issuer. Prior to the commencement of the program, the Exchange
would match issuers with approved BLPs. For issuers that have at least
one debt issue with current outstanding principal of at least $500
million, each BLP would select the issuers it will represent in the
program, with the order of selection among BLPs determined by lottery.
For issuers that do not have any debt issue with current outstanding
principal of at least $500 million, each BLP would submit a list of
issuers and bonds it would be willing to represent. The BLP that is
willing to represent the most bonds for a given issuer would be matched
to that issuer. In the event of a tie, the BLP with the highest lottery
number from the first round of matching would be matched with the
issuer.
    After the commencement of the program, on a monthly basis, BLPs
would be able to apply for unrepresented issuers. The BLP willing to
represent the most debt issuances of any given unrepresented issuer
would be awarded status as a BLP for that issuer, with ties resolved by
lottery.
    A BLP would be required, with respect to an assigned issuer, to
represent each debt issuance of that issuer that has an outstanding
principal of $500 million or more. A BLP could, but would not be
required to, represent any debt issuance with a smaller outstanding
principal amount. If a BLP were representing a debt issuance that was
above $500 million but fell below that level, or if a BLP had been
voluntarily representing an issuance below the $500 million level where
the outstanding principal amount had since been reduced, the BLP would
be

permitted to cease representing that debt issuance by notifying the
Exchange in writing by the 15th day of the month, in which case the BLP
could cease representing the issuance on the first day of the following
month.
4. Appeal of Disapproval or Disqualification
    An Exchange member organization would be able to dispute the
Exchange's decision to disapprove an application or to disqualify a
member from BLP status by requesting, within five business days of
receiving notice of the decision, review by the Bond Liquidity Provider
Panel (``BLP Panel''). The BLP Panel would be composed of the
Exchange's Chief Regulatory Officer (or a designee) and two officers of
the Exchange designated by the Co-Head of U.S. Listings and Cash
Execution. In the event an Exchange member organization were
disqualified from its status as a BLP, the Exchange would not reassign
the appellant's bonds to a different BLP until the BLP Panel had
informed the appellant of its ruling. The BLP Panel would review the
facts and render a decision within the time frame prescribed by the
Exchange, and all determinations by the BLP Panel would constitute
final action by the Exchange.
5. Voluntary Withdrawal of BLP Status
    A BLP would be able to withdraw its status as a BLP by giving
notice to the Exchange. After the Exchange received the notice of
withdrawal, the Exchange would reassign bonds assigned to the
withdrawing BLP as soon as practicable, but no later than 30 days from
the date the notice was received by the Exchange. Withdrawal would
become effective when bonds assigned to the withdrawing BLP were
reassigned to another BLP. If the reassignment of bonds took longer
than the 30-day period, the withdrawing BLP would have no further
obligations and would not be responsible for any matters concerning its
previously assigned BLP bonds.
6. Quoting Requirement
    A BLP would be required to maintain: (1) A bid at least 70% of the
trading day for each assigned bond; (2) an offer at least 70% of the
trading day for each assigned bond; and (3) a bid or offer at the
Exchange's Best Bid (``BB'') or Exchange's Best Offer (``BO'') at least
5% of the trading day in each of its bonds in the aggregate. A BLP that
met these quoting requirements would receive a liquidity provider
rebate, to be set forth in the Exchange's Price List.
7. Calculation of Quoting Requirement
    On a daily and monthly basis, the Exchange would calculate whether
a BLP met its 70% quoting requirement by determining the average
percentage of time a BLP posted bids and offers in each of its BLP
bonds during the regular trading day.\6\ The 5% quoting requirement
would take effect starting the third month of a BLP's participation. On
a daily and monthly basis, the Exchange would determine whether a BLP
had met its 5% quoting requirement by determining the average
percentage of time a BLP was at the BB or BO in each of its assigned
BLP bonds during the regular trading day.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See proposed NYSE Rule 88(f)(1).
    \7\ See proposed NYSE Rule 88(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

8. Failure To Meet Quoting Requirements
    After an initial two-month grace period, if, in any given calendar
month, a BLP failed to meet any of the quoting requirements for an
assigned bond, the BLP would not receive the rebate for transactions in
that bond for that month. If a BLP's failure to meet the quoting
requirements continued for three consecutive calendar months in any
assigned BLP bond, the Exchange could, in its discretion, take one or
more of the following actions: (i) Revoke the assignment of all of the
affected issuer's bonds from the BLP; (ii) revoke the assignment of an
additional unaffected issuer from the BLP; or (iii) disqualify a member
organization from its status as a BLP.
    The Exchange would determine if and when a member organization
would be disqualified from its status as a BLP. One calendar month
prior to any such determination, the Exchange would notify a BLP of its
impending disqualification in writing. When disqualification
determinations were made, the Exchange would provide a disqualification
notice to the member organization.
    If a member organization were denied approval or disqualified from
its status as a BLP, that member organization could re-apply for BLP
status three calendar months after the month in which the member
organization received its disapproval or disqualification notice.

III. Discussion and Findings

    After carefully reviewing the proposal, the Commission finds that
the proposed rule change to create a BTL for member organizations and
to establish BLPs as a class of NYSE market participants is consistent
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\8\ In
particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ which, among other
things, requires that the rules of a national securities exchange be
designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ In approving the proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule change's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission notes that the proposed BTL would allow a member
organization that wishes to trade only debt securities to become
authorized to trade on the Exchange pursuant to a license more
specifically tailored to that member organization's trading. The
Commission believes that this aspect of the proposal could increase
efficiency, without compromising regulatory oversight, for member
organization applicants and the Exchange. The Commission also notes
that the proposed BLPs would be required to have adequate trading
infrastructure and technology to support trading in the debt securities
and to meet quoting requirements. Furthermore, BLPs would have to be
approved by the Exchange and, upon meeting quoting requirements and
providing liquidity to NYSE's bond market, would receive a rebate based
on an incentive and quoting structure.\10\ BLPs that fail to meet the
quoting requirements set forth in the proposed rule would no longer be
eligible for the rebate and could, in the Exchange's discretion, be
disqualified as a BLP or have one or more issues revoked. The
Commission believes that it is consistent with the requirements of the
Act for the Exchange to provide an incentive to member organizations to
provide liquidity to the bond marketplace and to remove the incentive
if a BLP does not meet its obligations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The Exchange has not submitted a filing to set forth the
rebate with respect to the proposed program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As proposed, only one BLP could represent the bonds of a given
issuer. With respect to issuers having at least one issue with an
outstanding principal of at least $500 million, BLPs would, in an order
determined by lottery, select the issuers they would represent. Issuers

not having at least one issue with an outstanding principal of at least
$500 million would be matched to BLPs willing to represent the most
bonds for that given issuer, and any tie with respect to BLPs wishing
to represent these issuers would be resolved by allowing BLPs to choose
in the order determined by lottery. The Commission believes that the
proposed allocation of issuers to BLPs is an objective way to initiate
the BLP.
    NYSE would allow BLPs and BLP applicants the opportunity to appeal
disapproval or disqualification decisions, as applicable, to a BLP
panel, and NYSE would provide a disqualified BLP with a month's prior
written notice of the disqualification. The Commission believes that
this should provide transparency to the process and an additional
opportunity for BLPs and BLP applicants to be heard by the Exchange.
    The Commission notes that debt securities typically trade in a
decentralized over-the-counter dealer market that is less liquid and
transparent than the equities markets. The proposal to reward market
participants for actively quoting and providing liquidity could enhance
market quality for bonds traded on the Exchange.
    For the reasons discussed above, the Commission finds that the
proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act.

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\11\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2014-08), be, and it
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-09922 Filed 4-30-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: April 11, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 69)]
[Notices]
[Page 18228-18229]
[DOCID:fr11ap07-65]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP99-176-130]

Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America; Notice of Tariff Filing
and Negotiated Rate

April 5, 2007.
    Take notice that on March 30, 2007, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of
America (Natural) tendered for filing as part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
Sixth Revised Volume No. 1, the following tariff sheet, to become
effective May 1, 2007:

    Second Revised Sheet No. 26F, Original Sheet No. 414A.10.

    Natural states that copies of this filing are being mailed to all
parties set out on the Commission's official service list.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest this filing must file
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as

appropriate. Such notices, motions, or protests must be filed in
accordance with the provisions of Section 154.210 of the Commission's
regulations (18 CFR 154.210). Anyone filing an intervention or protest
must serve a copy of that document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an
intervention or protest on or before the intervention or protest date
need not serve motions to intervene or protests on persons other than
the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Philis J. Posey,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. E7-6808 Filed 4-10-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 78 (Friday, April 22, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 24222]
[FR Doc No: 2022-08626]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

[Docket No. FAA-2022-0201]

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of a Renewed Approval of Information Collection:
Certification: Pilots and Flight Instructors

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment period
soliciting comments on the following collection of information was
published on February 15, 2022. FAA regulations prescribe certification
standards for pilots, flight instructors, and ground instructors. The
information collected is used to determine compliance with applicant
eligibility.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by May 23, 2022.

ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting ``Currently under 30-day Review--
Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean Hardy by email at:
[email protected]. Phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information.
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0021.
    Title: Certification: Pilots and Flight Instructors.
    Form Numbers: 8710-1, 8710-13.
    Type of Review: This is a renewal of an existing information
collection.
    Background: The Federal Register Notice with a 60-day comment
period soliciting comments on the following collection of information
was published on February 15, 2022 (87 FR 8631). Persons applying for
an airman certificate under part 61 are mandated to report information
using the Airman certificate and/or Rating Application form and the
required records, logbooks and statements to the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) Flight Standards District Offices or its
representatives on occasion. This information is used to determine
qualifications of the applicant for issuance of a pilot or instructor
certificate, or rating or authorization. The FAA estimates that there
are approximately 825,000 active certificated pilot airmen. This
includes student, private, commercial, airline transport pilot
certificate holders, as well as ground and flight instructors.
Approximately 25% of these pilots are providing data on an annual
basis. Instructor certificates must be renewed every 24 months to
remain effective. If the information collection were not conducted, the
FAA would be unable to issue the appropriate certificates and ratings.
Persons applying for a remote pilot certificate with a small UAS rating
under part 107, are mandated to report information using the FAA Form
8710-13, Remote Pilot Certificate and/or Rating Application. For
applicants who do not hold a pilot certificate under part 61, the
Remote Pilot Certificate and/or Rating Application is submitted along
with a documentation demonstrating that the applicant passed an
aeronautical knowledge test. For applicants who hold a pilot
certificate under part 61 and meet the flight review requirements of
Sec.  61.56, the Remote Pilot Certificate and/or Rating Application is
submitted with evidence of completion of the training program is
estimated to be approximately 25 percent of the population of active
certificated pilots and instructors. Given a population of 825,000, the
result is approximately 206,250 respondents providing data on an annual
basis. The total number of applicants for a remote pilot certificate
with a small UAS rating is estimated to be 39,229 annually.
    Respondents: Existing and prospective airmen.
    Frequency: On occasion.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: Approximately 15 minutes per
response.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 333,194 hours per year for reporting
and recordkeeping.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on April 19, 2022.
Dwayne C. Morris,
Project Manager, Flight Standards Service, General Aviation and
Commercial Division.
[FR Doc. 2022-08626 Filed 4-21-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: July 23, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 140)]
[Notices]
[Page 36487]
[DOCID:fr23jy09-40]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0045; FRL-8425-2]

Notice of Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions Filed for
Residues of Pesticide Chemicals in or on Various Commodities;
Correction

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register of Wednesday, June
10, 2009 (74 FR 27538, FRL-8417-7), concerning the notice of receipt of
several pesticide petitions filed for residues of pesticide chemicals
in or on various commodities. This document is being issued to correct
the omission of papaya at 1.5 ppm under the ``New Tolerance'' section
in number 5. PP 9F7537 (EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0263).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rita Kumar, Registration Division,
Mail Code (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460-
0001; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information

A. Does this Action Apply to Me?

    The Agency included in the notice a list of those who may be
potentially affected by this action. If you have questions regarding
the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.

B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information?

    1. Docket. EPA has established a docket for this action under
docket identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0263 Publicly
available docket materials are available either in the electronic
docket at http://www.regulations.gov, or, if only available in hard
copy, at the Office of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory Public
Docket in Rm. S-4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S. Crystal
Dr., Arlington, VA. The hours of operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket Facility telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet under the ``Federal Register''
listings at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr.

II. What Does this Correction Do?

    FR Doc. E9-13161 published in the Federal Register of Wednesday,
June 10, 2009 (Vol. 74, No. 110 FR 27540-27541) (FRL-8417-7) is
corrected as follows: Beginning on page 27540, in the third column,
under 5. PP 9F7537. (EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0263), on page 27541, in the 16th
line before ``passionfruit'' and after ``mango,'' add ``papaya at 1.5
ppm'' to list of commodities on page 27541.

List of Subjects

    Environmental protection, Agricultural commodities, Feed additives,
Food additives, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.

    Dated: July 10, 2009.
Lois Rossi,
Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E9-17548 Filed 7-22-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-S