[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 94 (Monday, May 16, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30299-30300]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11435]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. AD16-16-000]

Implementation Issues Under the Public Utility Regulatory
Policies Act of 1978; Supplemental Notice of Technical Conference

    As announced in the Notice of Technical Conference issued in this
proceeding on February 9, 2016, the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (Commission) will hold a technical conference on June 29,
2016, from 9:00 a.m. to approximately 4:00 p.m. on implementation
issues under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978
(PURPA).\1\ The conference will be held in the Commission Meeting Room
at the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 16 U.S.C. 824a-3 (2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The purpose of the technical conference is to focus on issues
associated with the Commission's implementation of PURPA. As noted in
the preliminary agenda previously issued in this proceeding,\2\ the
conference will focus on two issues: the mandatory purchase obligation
under PURPA and the determination of avoided costs for those purchases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Supplemental Notice Concerning Technical Conference, 81 FR
12,726 (2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An updated Agenda for the technical conference, including speakers,
is attached.
    Panelists are invited to submit written comments (10 page limit) in
advance of this technical conference, no later than June 7, 2016. These
statements will be available prior to the conference on the
Commission's Web site. Panelists will have the opportunity to make
opening remarks (3 minute limit) at the start of the respective panels.
    Those who plan to attend the technical conference are strongly
encouraged to complete the registration form located at: https://www.ferc.gov/whats-new/registration/06-29-16-form.asp. There is no
registration deadline or fee to attend the conference.
    Information on this event will be posted on the Calendar of Events
on the Commission's Web site, http://www.ferc.gov, prior to the event.
The conference will be transcribed. Transcripts will be available for a
fee from Ace Reporting Company<PHONE_NUMBER>). A free webcast of this
event is also available through www.ferc.gov.
    Anyone with Internet access who desires to view this event can do
so by navigating to http://www.ferc.gov Calendar of Events and locating
this event in the Calendar. The event will contain a link to the
webcast. The Capitol Connection provides technical support for webcasts
and offers the option of listening to the meeting via phone-bridge for
a fee. If you have any questions, visit www.CapitolConnection.org or
call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Commission conferences are accessible under section 508 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973. For accessibility accommodations, please
send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll free (866) 208-
3372 (voice) or<PHONE_NUMBER> (TTY), or send a FAX to<PHONE_NUMBER>
with the required accommodations.
    While this conference is not for the purpose of discussing specific
cases, we note that the discussions at the conference may address
matters at issue in the following Commission proceedings that are
either pending or within their rehearing period:

Occidental Chemical            Docket No. EL13-41-000
 Corporation.
Occidental Chemical            Docket Nos. EL14-28-000
 Corporation.
                               QF00-64-002
Tri-State Generation and       Docket No. EL16-39-000
 Transmission Association,
 Inc..
Bright Light Capital, LLC....  Docket Nos. EL16-43-000
                               QF16-259-001
Nebraska Public Power          Docket No. QM16-1-000
 District.
Ameren Illinois Company and    Docket No. QM16-2-000
 Union Electric Company.
Gregory and Beverly Swecker    Docket Nos. EL14-9-000
 v. Midland Power Cooperative.

                               QF11-424-002
Gregory and Beverly Swecker    Docket No. EL14-18-000
 v. Midland Power Cooperative
 and Central Iowa Power
 Cooperative.
Interconnect Solar             Docket Nos. EL16-55-000
 Development LLC.
                               QF11-204-002
                               QF11-205-002
SunE B9 Holdings, LLC........  Docket Nos. EL16-58-000
                               QF15-793-001
                               QF15-794-001
                               QF15-795-001
Golden Spread Electric         Docket No. QM16-3-000
 Cooperative, Inc..
Golden Spread Electric         Docket No. EL16-62-000
 Cooperative, Inc..
Oklahoma Municipal Power       Docket No. EL16-67-000
 Authority.

    For more information about the technical conference, please
contact:
    Technical Information, Adam Alvarez, Office of Energy Market
Regulation, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Legal Information, Loni Silva, Office of the General Counsel,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>    Logistical Information, Sarah McKinley, Office of External Affairs,
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington,
DC 20426,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: May 9, 2016.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-11435 Filed 5-13-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: July 17, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 136)]
[Notices]
[Page 40508-40509]
[DOCID:fr17jy06-62]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0138; FRL-8197-8]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; Applications for the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Discharge Permit and the Sewage
Sludge Management Permit, EPA ICR No. 0226.18, OMB Control No. 2040-
0086

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. This ICR is scheduled to expire on September 30,
2006. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or
sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending
at OMB. This ICR describes the nature of the information collection and
its estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before August 16,
2006.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OW-2006-0138, to (1) EPA online using http://www.regulations.gov (our preferred method), by e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to: EPA

Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Water Docket, Mail Code
4101T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460, and (2) OMB
at: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street,
NW., Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lynn Stabenfeldt, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On March 7, 2006 (71 FR 11407-11411), EPA sought comments on
this ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received one set of comments
on the draft ICR. EPA's response to those comments is reflected in the
ICR supporting statement. Any additional comments on this ICR should be
submitted to EPA and OMB within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OW-2006-0138, which is available for online viewing at
http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the Water Docket in the

EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution
Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is
open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is (202) 566-
1744, and the telephone number for the Water Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at
http://www.regulations.gov, to submit or view public comments, access the

index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
comments in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA receives

them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted
material, CBI, or other information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further information about the electronic
docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov.

    Title: Applications for the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System Discharge Permit and the Sewage Sludge Management
Permit.
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR No. 0226.18, OMB Control No.2040-0086.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on September 30, 2006.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor
the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB.
An

Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information, unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations
in title 40 of the CFR, after appearing in the Federal Register when
approved, are listed in 40 CFR part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or by other appropriate means, such
as on the related collection instrument or form, if applicable. The
display of OMB control numbers in certain EPA regulations is
consolidated in 40 CFR part 9.
    Abstract: This ICR calculates the burden and costs associated with
permit applications for NPDES discharges and sewage sludge management
activities. EPA uses the data contained in applications and
supplemental information requests to set appropriate permit conditions,
issue permits, and assess permit compliance. EPA maintains certain
national application information in databases that assist permit
writers in determining permit conditions. For most permits, EPA has
developed standard application forms. In some cases, such as requests
for additional information and storm water applications from municipal
separate sewer systems, standard forms do not exist because standard
forms are not appropriate for the information collected or because they
have not been developed. Application forms correspond to the different
types of applicants, each form requesting information necessary for
issuing permits to the associated applicants. Depending on the
application form they are using, applicants may be required to supply
information about their facilities, discharges, treatment systems,
sewage sludge use and disposal practices, pollutant sampling data, or
other relevant information. Section 308 of the Clean Water Act
authorizes EPA to request from dischargers any information that may be
reasonably required to carry out the objectives and provision of the
Act. Under this authority, EPA sometimes requests information
supplemental to that contained in permit applications. In its burden
and cost calculations, this ICR includes requests for information
supplemental to permit applications. Other parts of the Clean Water Act
and Federal regulations authorize EPA to collect information that
supplements permit applications, such as section 403(c). This ICR
calculates the burden and costs for all information collection
activities associated with applications for permits. Application
information is necessary to obtain an NPDES or sewage sludge permit.
    Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping
burden for this collection of information is estimated to average less
than 5 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or
financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain,
or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Entities potentially affected by
this action are publicly owned treatment works (POTWs), privately owned
treatment works, new and existing manufacturing and commercial
dischargers, storm water dischargers, treatment works treating domestic
sewage (TWTDS), and other entities that apply for NPDES permits.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 249,494.
    Frequency of Response: Once every five years.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 1,358,253 hours.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $48,587,228, includes $0 for capital
investment and $5,379,500 for O&M costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: The estimated decrease in burden is
41,728 hours compared to the total estimated burden hours currently
identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burden. This change is
primarily the result of updating the universe of permitted facilities
subject to these requirements.

    Dated: July 7, 2006.
Oscar Morales,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. E6-11252 Filed 7-14-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 213 (Monday, November 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 66097]
[FR Doc No: 2013-26446]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[ File No. 500-1]

In the Matter of Heritage Worldwide, Inc., Impala Mineral
Exploration Corp., Klondike Star Mineral Corporation, MIV Therapeutics
Inc., Most Home Corp., Moventis Capital, Inc., and OrganiTECH USA,
Inc.; Order of Suspension of Trading

October 31, 2013.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Heritage Worldwide, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended December 31, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Impala Mineral Exploration Corp. because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended March 31, 2009.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Klondike Star Mineral Corporation because it has not filed any periodic
reports since the period ended May 31, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
MIV Therapeutics Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended November 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Most Home Corp. because it has not filed any periodic reports since the
period ended April 30, 2008.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
Moventis Capital, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended March 31, 2007.
    It appears to the Securities and Exchange Commission that there is
a lack of current and accurate information concerning the securities of
OrganiTECH USA, Inc. because it has not filed any periodic reports
since the period ended September 30, 2008.
    The Commission is of the opinion that the public interest and the
protection of investors require a suspension of trading in the
securities of the above-listed companies. Therefore, it is ordered,
pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, that
trading in the securities of the above-listed companies is suspended
for the period from 9:30 a.m. EDT on October 31, 2013, through 11:59
p.m. EST on November 13, 2013.

    By the Commission.
Jill M. Peterson,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-26446 Filed 10-31-13; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


These rules contain no Federal mandates (under the regulatory provisions of Title II of the UMRA) for State, local, or tribal governments.  The rules impose no enforceable duty on any State, local or tribal governments.  The agencies have determined that these rules contain no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments.  The agencies have determined that these rules contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 or more for the private sector in any one year.  The agencies believe that the program represents the least costly, most cost-effective approach to achieve the statutory requirements of the rules.  Section VIII.L, above, explains why the agencies believe that the fuel savings that will result from these rules will lead to lower prices economy-wide, improving U.S. international competitiveness. The costs and benefits associated with the program are discussed in more detail above in Section VIII and in the Regulatory Impact Analysis, as required by the UMRA.
Table XI-3 presents the rule-related benefits, costs and net benefits in both present value terms and in annualized terms.  In both cases, the discounted values are based on an underlying time varying stream of cost and benefit values that extend into the future (2012 through 2050).  The distribution of each monetized economic impact over time can be viewed in the RIA that accompanies these rules.
Present values represent the total amount that a stream of monetized costs/benefits/net benefits that occur over time are worth now (in year 2009 dollar terms for this analysis), accounting for the time value of money by discounting future values using either a 3 or 7 percent discount rate, per OMB Circular A-4 guidance.  An annualized value takes the present value and converts it into a constant stream of annual values through a given time period (2012 through 2050 in this analysis) and thus averages (in present value terms) the annual values.  The present value of the constant stream of annualized values equals the present value of the underlying time varying stream of values. The ratio of benefits to costs is identical whether it is measured with present values or annualized values.
It is important to note that annualized values cannot simply be summed over time to reflect total costs/benefits/net benefits; they must be discounted and summed.  Additionally, the annualized value can vary substantially from the time varying stream of cost/benefit/net benefit values that occur in any given year (e.g., the streams of costs represented by $0.4B and $0.7B in Table XI-3 below average $1.5B from 2014 through 2018 and are zero from 2019-2050).
Table XI-3: Estimated Lifetime and Annualized Discounted Costs, Benefits, and Net Benefits for 2014-2018 Model Year HD Vehicles assuming the $22/ton SCC Value[a,b] (billions 2009 dollars)

Costs
Benefits
Net Benefits
Lifetime Present Value[c,d]  -  3% Discount Rate
$8.9
$58.4
$49
Annualized Value[c,e]  -  3% Discount Rate
$0.4
$2.6
$2.2
Lifetime Present Value[c,d]  -  7% Discount Rate
$8.9
$42
$33
Annualized Value[c,e]  -  7% Discount Rate
$0.7
$3.1
$2.4
  Notes:
  [a] Although the agencies estimated the benefits associated with four different values of a one ton CO2 reduction (SCC: $5, $22, $36, $66), for the purposes of this overview presentation of estimated costs and benefits we are showing the benefits associated with the marginal value deemed to be central by the interagency working group on this topic:  $22 per ton of CO2, in 2008 dollars and 2010 emissions and fuel consumption.  As noted in Section VIII.G, SCC increases over time.
  [b] Note that net present value of reduced GHG emissions is calculated differently than other benefits.  The same discount rate used to discount the value of damages from future emissions (SCC at 5, 3, and 2.5 percent) is used to calculate net present value of SCC for internal consistency.  Refer to Section VIII.G for more detail.
  [c] Discounted values presented in this table are based on an underlying series of cost and benefit values that extend into the future (2012 through 2050).  The distribution of each monetized economic impact over time can be viewed in the RIA that accompanies this preamble.
  d  Present value is the total, aggregated amount that a series of monetized costs or benefits that occur over time is worth now (in year 2008 dollar terms), discounting future values to the present.
  [e] The annualized value is the constant annual value through a given time period (2012 through 2050 in this analysis) whose summed present value equals the present value from which it was derived.
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This action does not have federalism implications.  It will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132.  These rules will apply to manufacturers of motor vehicles and not to state or local governments. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this action.  Although section 6 of Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this action, the agencies did consult with representatives of state governments in developing this action.
NHTSA notes that EPCA contains a provision (49 U.S.C. 32919(a)) that expressly preempts any State or local government from adopting or enforcing a law or regulation related to fuel economy standards or average fuel economy standards for automobiles covered by an average fuel economy standard under 49 U.S.C. Chapter 329.  However, commercial medium- and heavy-duty on-highway vehicles and work trucks are not "automobiles," as defined in 49 U.S.C. 32901(a)(3).  Accordingly, NHTSA has tentatively concluded that EPCA's express preemption provision would not reach the fuel efficiency standards to be established in this rulemaking.
NHTSA also considered the issue of implied or conflict preemption.  The possibility of such preemption is dependent upon there being an actual conflict between a standard established by NHTSA in this rulemaking and a State or local law or regulation.  See Spriestma v. Mercury Marine, 537 U.S. 51, 64-65 (2002).  At present, NHTSA has no knowledge of any State or local law or regulation that would actually conflict with one of the fuel efficiency standards being established in this rulemaking.
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments)
These final rules do not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).  These rules will be implemented at the Federal level and impose compliance costs only on vehicle manufacturers.  Tribal governments would be affected only to the extent they purchase and use regulated vehicles.  Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to these rules.
Executive Order 13045: "Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks"
This action is subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it is an economically significant regulatory action as defined by Executive Order 12866, and the agencies believe that the environmental health or safety risk addressed by this action may have a disproportionate effect on children.  A synthesis of the science and research regarding how climate change may affect children and other vulnerable subpopulations is contained in the Technical Support Document for Endangerment or Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases under Section 202(a) of the Clean Air Act, which can be found in the public docket for these rules.  A summary of the analysis is presented below.
With respect to GHG emissions, the effects of climate change observed to date and projected to occur in the future include the increased likelihood of more frequent and intense heat waves. Specifically, EPA's analysis of the scientific assessment literature has determined that severe heat waves are projected to intensify in magnitude, frequency, and duration over the portions of the United States where these events already occur, with potential increases in mortality and morbidity, especially among the young, elderly, and frail.  EPA has estimated reductions in projected global mean surface temperatures as a result of reductions in GHG emissions associated with the final standards  in this action (Section II).  Children may receive benefits from reductions in GHG emissions because they are included in the segment of the population that is most vulnerable to extreme temperatures.
For non-GHG pollutants, EPA has determined that climate change is expected to increase regional ozone pollution, with associated risks in respiratory infection, aggravation of asthma, and premature death. The directional effect of climate change on ambient PM levels remains uncertain.  However, disturbances such as wildfires are increasing in the United States and are likely to intensify in a warmer future with drier soils and longer growing seasons. PM emissions from forest fires can contribute to acute and chronic illnesses of the respiratory system, particularly in children, including pneumonia, upper respiratory diseases, asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases.
Executive Order 13211 (Energy Effects)
This rulemaking is not a "significant energy action" as defined in Executive Order 13211, "Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use" (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy.  In fact, these rules have a positive effect on energy supply and use.  Because the final GHG emission and fuel consumption standards will result in significant fuel savings, these rules encourage more efficient use of fuels.  Therefore, we have concluded that these rules are not likely to have any adverse energy effects.  Our energy effects analysis is described above in Section VIII.H.
National Technology Transfer Advancement Act
Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 ("NTTAA"), Public Law No. 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs the agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., materials, specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.  NTTAA directs the agencies to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the agencies decide not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
For CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions and fuel consumption from heavy-duty engines, the agencies will collect data over the same tests that are used for the heavy-duty highway engine program for criteria pollutants.  This will minimize the amount of testing done by manufacturers, since manufacturers are already required to run these tests.
For CO2, N2O, and CH4 emissions and fuel consumption from complete pickup trucks and vans, the agencies will collect data over the same tests that are used for EPA's heavy-duty highway engine program for criteria pollutants and for the California Air Resources Board.  This will minimize the amount of testing done by manufacturers, since manufacturers are already required to run these tests.
For CO2 emissions and fuel consumption from heavy-duty combination tractors and vocational vehicles, the agencies will collect data through the use of a simulation model instead of a full-vehicle chassis dynamometer testing.  This will minimize the amount of testing done by manufacturers.  EPA's compliance assessment tool is based upon well-established engineering and physics principals that are the basis of general academic understanding in this area, and the foundation of any dynamic vehicle simulation model, including the models cited by ICCT in its study.  Therefore, the EPA's compliance assessment tool satisfies the description of a consensus.  For the evaluation of tire rolling resistance input to the model, EPA is finalizing to use the ISO 28580 test, a voluntary consensus methodology.  EPA is adopting several alternatives for the evaluation of aerodynamics which allows the industry to continue to use their own evaluation tools because EPA does not know of a single consensus standard available for heavy-duty truck aerodynamic evaluation.
For air conditioning standards, EPA is finalizing a consensus methodology developed by the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE).
Executive Order 12898:  Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes federal executive policy on environmental justice.  Its main provision directs federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States.
With respect to GHG emissions, EPA has determined that these final rules will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or low-income populations because they increase the level of environmental protection for all affected populations without having any disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on any population, including any minority or low-income population.  The reductions in CO2 and other GHGs associated with the standards will affect climate change projections, and EPA has estimated reductions in projected global mean surface temperatures (Section VI).  Within communities experiencing climate change, certain parts of the population may be especially vulnerable; these include the poor, the elderly, those already in poor health, the disabled, those living alone, and/or indigenous populations dependent on one or a few resources.  In addition, the U.S. Climate Change Science Program stated as one of its conclusions: "The United States is certainly capable of adapting to the collective impacts of climate change.  However, there will still be certain individuals and locations where the adaptive capacity is less and these individuals and their communities will be disproportionally impacted by climate change."   Therefore, these specific sub-populations may receive benefits from reductions in GHGs.
For non-GHG co-pollutants such as ozone, PM2.5, and toxics, EPA has concluded that it is not practicable to determine whether there would be disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority and/or low income populations from these rules.
Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States.  EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.  A Major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register.  This action is a "major rule" as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This rule will be effective [Insert date 60 days after publication in the Federal Register], sixty days after date of publication in the Federal Register.
Statutory Provisions and Legal Authority
EPA
Statutory authority for the vehicle controls in these rules is found in CAA section 202(a) (which  authorizes standards for emissions of pollutants from new motor vehicles which emissions cause or contribute to air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare), sections 202(d), 203-209, 216, and 301 of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. 7521 (a), 7521 (d), 7522, 7523, 7524, 7525, 7541, 7542, 7543, 7550, and 7601.
NHTSA
Statutory authority for the fuel consumption standards in these rules is found in EISA section 103 (which authorizes a fuel efficiency improvement program, designed to achieve the maximum feasible improvement to be created for commercial medium- and heavy-duty on-highway vehicles and work trucks, to include appropriate test methods, measurement metrics, standards, and compliance and enforcement protocols that are appropriate, cost-effective and technologically feasible) of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, 49 U.S.C. 32902(k).
 List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 85
Confidential business information, Imports, Labeling, Motor vehicle pollution, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Research, Warranties.

40 CFR Part 86
Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business information, Labeling, Motor vehicle pollution, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

40 CFR Parts 1036 and 1037
Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Confidential business information, Environmental protection, Incorporation by reference, Labeling, Motor vehicle pollution, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Warranties.

40 CFR Parts 1065 and 1066
Administrative practice and procedure, Air pollution control, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Research.

40 CFR Part 1068
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure, Confidential business information, Imports, Incorporation by reference, Motor vehicle pollution, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Warranties.

49 CFR Parts 523, 534, and 535
Fuel economy


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 118 (Tuesday, June 19, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28483-28484]
[FR Doc No: 2018-13081]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-83422; File No. SR-FINRA-2018-015]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for
Commission Action on a Proposed Rule Change To Amend FINRA Rule 6433 To
Adopt the OTC Quotation Tier Size Pilot as Permanent

June 13, 2018.
    On April 20, 2018, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'')

filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to
amend FINRA Rule 6433 to adopt the OTC quotation tier size pilot as
permanent. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on May 7, 2018.\3\ The Commission has received one
comment letter on the proposed rule change.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C.78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 83129 (April 30,
2018), 83 FR 20131.
    \4\ See Letter from Eugene P. Torpey, Chief Compliance Officer,
Vandham Securities Corp. (May 10, 2018). All comments on the
proposed rule change are available on the Commission's website at:
https://www.sec.gov/comments/sr-finra-2018-015/finra2018015.htm.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \5\ provides that within 45 days of the
publication of notice of the filing of a proposed rule change, or
within such longer period up to 90 days as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or as to which the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The
45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change
is June 21, 2018. The Commission is extending this 45-day time period.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that
it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\6\ designates August 5, 2018, as the date by which the Commission
shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change (File No. SR-
FINRA-2018-015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(31).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Eduardo A. Aleman,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2018-13081 Filed 6-18-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19030-19031]
[FR Doc No: E9-9522]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2008-1271; Airspace Docket No. 08-AGL-18]

Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Mansfield, OH

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend Class E airspace at Mansfield,
OH. Additional controlled airspace is necessary to accommodate new
Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) at Mansfield/Lahm
Regional Airport, Mansfield, OH. The FAA is taking this action to
enhance the safety and management of Instrument Flight Rules (IFR)
aircraft operations at Mansfield/Lahm Regional Airport. This action
also would update the airport name to Mansfield/Lahm Regional Airport
and update the geographic coordinates of Shelby Community Airport and
Willard Airport.

DATES: 0901 UTC. Comments must be received on or before June 11, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001. You
must identify the docket number FAA-2008-1271/Airspace Docket No. 08-
AGL-18, at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments
on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. You may review the
public docket containing the proposal, any comments received, and any
final disposition in person in the Docket Office between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The Docket Office
(telephone 1-800-647-5527), is on the ground floor of the building at
the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Enander, Central Service Center,
Operations Support Group, Federal Aviation Administration, Southwest
Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Fort Worth, TX 76193-0530; telephone: (817)
222-5582.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments, as
they may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
Communications should identify both docket numbers and be submitted in
triplicate to the address listed above. Commenters wishing the FAA to
acknowledge receipt of their comments on this notice must submit with
those comments a self-addressed, stamped postcard on which the
following statement is made: ``Comments to Docket No. FAA-2008-1271/
Airspace Docket No. 08-AGL-18.'' The postcard will be date/time stamped
and returned to the commenter.

Availability of NPRMs

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's Web page at http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraffic/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    Additionally, any person may obtain a copy of this notice by
submitting a request to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA),
Office of Air Traffic Airspace Management, ATA-400, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>.
Communications must identify both docket numbers for this notice.
Persons interested in being placed on a mailing list for future NPRM's
should contact the FAA's Office of Rulemaking<PHONE_NUMBER>, to
request a copy of Advisory Circular No.

11-2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Distribution System, which
describes the application procedure.

The Proposal

    This action proposes to amend Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR), Part 71 by changing the airport name from Mansfield/Lahm
Municipal Airport to Mansfield/Lahm Regional Airport; adding additional
Class E airspace for SIAPs operations at Mansfield/Lahm Regional
Airport, Mansfield, OH; and would update the geographic coordinates of
Shelby Community Airport and Willard Airport.
    The area would be depicted on appropriate aeronautical charts.
    Class E airspace areas are published in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9S, dated October 3, 2008, and effective October 31, 2008, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace
designation listed in this document would be published subsequently in
the Order.
    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore, (1) is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979);
and (3) does not warrant preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation as the
anticipated impact is so minimal. Since this is a routine matter that
will only affect air traffic procedures and air navigation, it is
certified that this rule, when promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act. The FAA's authority to
issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the U.S.
Code. Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA
Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the agency's authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This
regulation is within the scope of that authority as it would add
additional controlled airspace at Mansfield/Lahm Regional Airport,
Mansfield, OH.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS;
AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

    1. The authority citation for Part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24
FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

    2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of Federal
Aviation Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace Designations and
Reporting Points, dated October 3, 2008, and effective October 31,
2008, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas extending upward from 700
feet or more above the surface of the earth.

* * * * *

AGL OH E5 Mansfield, OH [Amended]

Mansfield, Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport, OH
    (Lat. 40[deg]49'17'' N., long. 82[deg]31'00'' W.)
Galion, Galion Municipal Airport, OH
    (Lat. 40[deg]45'12'' N., long. 82[deg]43'26'' W.)
Shelby, Shelby Community Airport, OH
    (Lat. 40[deg]52'22'' N., long. 82[deg]41'51'' W)
Willard, Willard Airport, OH
    (Lat. 41[deg]02'20'' N., long. 82[deg]43'28'' W.)
Mansfield VORTAC
    (Lat. 40[deg]52'07'' N., long. 82[deg]35'28'' W.)

    That airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface
within a 6.9-mile radius of Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport and
within a 6.3-mile radius of Galion Municipal Airport, and within a
6.3-mile radius of Shelby Community Airport, and within a 6.3-mile
radius of Willard Airport, and within 4 miles each side of the
137[deg] bearing from Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport extending from
the 6.9-mile radius to 11.1 miles southeast of the airport, and
within 4 miles each side of the 317[deg] bearing from Mansfield Lahm
Regional Airport extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 10.7 miles
northwest of the airport, and within 6.1 miles each side of the
Mansfield VORTAC 307[deg] radial extending from the 6.9-mile radius
to 13.3 miles northwest of the VORTAC, and within 4.4 miles each
side of the Mansfield VORTAC 130[deg] radial extending from the 6.9-
mile radius to 13.8 miles southeast of the VORTAC.
* * * * *

    Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on April 15, 2009.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E9-9522 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4901-13-P


[Federal Register: October 13, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 197)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 59680-59681]
[DOCID:fr13oc05-32]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR PART 51

[OAR-2005-0148; FRL-7982-9]

Advance Notice To Solicit Comments, Data and Information for
Determining the Emissions Reductions Achieved in Ozone Nonattainment
and Maintenance Areas From the Implementation of Rules Limiting the VOC
Content of AIM Coatings; Extension of Comment Period

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; extension of the comment
period.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is extending the comment period for an advanced notice of
proposed rulemaking (ANPR) published on August 31, 2005 (70 FR 51694).
In the August 31, 2005 ANPR, EPA solicited comments, data and
information for determining how to calculate the reductions in volatile
organic compounds (VOC) emissions achieved in ozone nonattainment and
maintenance areas from the implementation of rules which limit the VOC
content of architectural coatings (commonly referred to as
architectural industrial maintenance, or AIM, coatings). In addition to
submitting comments, data and information, interested parties may also
request to meet with EPA to present their recommended approaches and
rationales. Pursuant to requests of the Ozone Transport Commission and
the California Air Resources Board, EPA is extending the comment period
through December 16, 2005.

DATES: Comments, data, and information must be submitted on or before
December 16, 2005. Requests to meet with EPA should be made on or
before November 28, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Submit your written comments, data and information,
identified by Docket ID No. OAR-2005-0148, by one of the following
methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the

on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    Agency Web site: http://www.epa.gov/edocket. EDOCKET, EPA's

electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's preferred method
for receiving comments. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
    E-mail: Send electronic mail (e-mail) to EPA Docket Center at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Fax: Send faxes to the EPA Docket Center at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Mail: Air and Radiation Docket, U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, Mail Code 6102T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20460. Attn: Docket ID No. OAR-2005-0148, Advance Notice for
Information on Determining the Emissions Reductions Achieved from
Limiting the VOC Content of Architectural Coating. Please include a
total of two copies.
    Hand Delivery or Courier: EPA Docket Center (Air and Radiation
Docket), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA West Building, Room
B102, 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20004. Such
deliveries are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of
operation, and special arrangements should be made for delivery of
boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. OAR-2005-0148.
The EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change, and may be made available online at
http://www.epa.gov/edocket, including any personal information

provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through EDOCKET,
regulations.gov or e-mail. The EPA EDOCKET and the federal
regulations.gov websites are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means
EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment
directly to EPA without going through EDOCKET or regulations.gov, your
e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of
the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on
the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that
you include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the
EDOCKET index at http://www.epa.gov/edocket. Although listed in the

index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in EDOCKET or in hard copy during normal business hours at the Air and
Radiation Docket, (EPA/DC) EPA West, Room B102, 1301 Constitution Ave.,
NW., Washington, DC. The EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open
from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>,
and the telephone number for the Air Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marcia L. Spink, Associate Director
for Air Programs, Air Protection Division, Mail Code 3AP20, U.S. EPA
Region III, 1650 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103, telephone (215)
with EPA, please contact David Sanders, U.S. EPA, Ozone Policy &
Strategies Group, Air Quality Strategies & Standards Division, Mail
Code C539-02, Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards, Research
Triangle Park, NC 27711, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by e-mail at
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

    Dated: October 5, 2005.
William L. Wehrum,
Acting Assistant Administrator, Office of Air and Radiation.
[FR Doc. 05-20520 Filed 10-12-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 145 (Monday, July 29, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45598-45599]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18131]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property
Release at Huntsville International Airport, Huntsville, AL

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of intent to rule on land release request.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. 47153(c), notice is
being given that the FAA is considering a request from the Huntsville-
Madison County Airport Authority to waive the requirement that a 4.58-
acre parcel of surplus property, located at the Huntsville
International Airport, be used for aeronautical purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before August 28, 2013.

ADDRESSES: Comments on this notice may be mailed or delivered in
triplicate to the FAA at the following address: Jackson Airports
District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite B, Jackson, MS 39208-
2307.
    In addition, one copy of any comments submitted to the FAA must be
mailed or delivered to Mr. Luther H. Roberts, Jr., Deputy Director at
the following address: Huntsville-Madison County Airport Authority,
1000 Glenn Hearn Boulevard, Huntsville, AL 35824

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Roderick T. Nicholson, Program
Manager, Jackson Airports District Office, 100 West Cross Street, Suite
B, Jackson, MS 39208-2307,<PHONE_NUMBER>. The land release request may
be reviewed in person at this same location.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The FAA is reviewing a request by the
Huntsville-Madison County Airport Authority to release 4.58 acres of
surplus property at the Huntsville International Airport. The property
will be purchased by the Alabama Department of Transportation (ALDOT),
which is a state transportation organization. The property released
will be used for the interchange project off Interstate Route 565. The
net proceeds from the sale of this property will be used for FAA
approved airport purposes.
    Any person may inspect the request in person at the FAA office
listed above under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
    In addition, any person may, upon request, inspect the request,
notice and other documents germane to the request in person at the
office of the Huntsville-Madison County Airport Authority.

    Issued in Jackson, Mississippi on July 19, 2013.
Rans D. Black,
Manager, Jackson Airports District Office, Southern Region.
[FR Doc. 2013-18131 Filed 7-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 70 (Tuesday, April 12, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 21648]
[FR Doc No: 2022-07732]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 9690-000]

Eagle Creek Hydro Power, LLC, Eagle Creek Water Resources, LLC,
Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC; Notice of Authorization for Continued
Project Operation

    On March 31, 2020, Eagle Creek Hydro Power, LLC, Eagle Creek Water
Resources, LLC, and Eagle Creek Land Resources, LLC, (collectively
referred to as Eagle Creek) co-licensees for the Rio Hydroelectric
Project No.9690, filed an application for a new major license. The Rio
Hydroelectric Project is located on the Mongaup River in Sullivan and
Orange Counties, New York
    The license for Project No.9690 was issued for a period ending
March 31, 2022. Section 15(a)(1) of the FPA, 16 U.S.C. 808(a)(1),
requires the Commission, at the expiration of a license term, to issue
from year-to-year an annual license to the then licensee(s) under the
terms and conditions of the prior license until a new license is
issued, or the project is otherwise disposed of as provided in section
15 or any other applicable section of the FPA. If the project's prior
license waived the applicability of section 15 of the FPA, then, based
on section 9(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 558(c),
and as set forth at 18 CFR 16.21(a), if the licensee of such project
has filed an application for a subsequent license, the licensee may
continue to operate the project in accordance with the terms and
conditions of the license after the minor or minor part license
expires, until the Commission acts on its application. If the licensee
of such a project has not filed an application for a subsequent
license, then it may be required, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.21(b), to
continue project operations until the Commission issues someone else a
license for the project or otherwise orders disposition of the project.
    If the project is subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that an annual license for Project No.9690 is issued to
Eagle Creek for a period effective April 1, 2022 through March 31, 2023
or until the issuance of a new license for the project or other
disposition under the FPA, whichever comes first. If issuance of a new
license (or other disposition) does not take place on or before March
23, 2023, notice is hereby given that, pursuant to 18 CFR 16.18(c), an
annual license under section 15(a)(1) of the FPA is renewed
automatically without further order or notice by the Commission, unless
the Commission orders otherwise.
    If the project is not subject to section 15 of the FPA, notice is
hereby given that Eagle Creek is authorized to continue operation of
the Rio Hydroelectric Project, until such time as the Commission takes
final action on the application for a new major license.

    Dated: April 5, 2022.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-07732 Filed 4-11-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 145 (Monday, July 29, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 36468-36469]
[FR Doc No: 2019-15880]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Occupational Safety and Health Administration

29 CFR Part 1904

[Docket No. OSHA-2013-0023]
RIN 1218-AD17

Recording and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses;
Approval of Information Collection Requirements

AGENCY: Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA),
Department of Labor.

ACTION: Announcement of OMB information collection approval.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document announces Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
approval for the information collection requirements in the Recording
and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses regulation as revised
by the Tracking of Injuries and Illnesses final rule. OSHA sought OMB
approval of these requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (the PRA), and, as required by that Act, is announcing the
approval for these requirements. The OMB approval number is 1218-0176.

DATES: The information collection requirements contained in the final
rule which was published on January 25, 2019 (84 FR 380), were approved
by OMB on March 28, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Seleda Perryman, OSHA, Directorate of
Standards and Guidance, U.S. Department of Labor; telephone (202) 693-
2222.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 25, 2019, OSHA published the
Tracking of Injuries and Illnesses final rule revising the Recording
and Reporting Occupational Injuries and Illnesses regulation, 29 CFR
1904.41.

The regulation contains new and revised information collection
requirements. These requirements are contained in the Information
Collection Request (ICR) approved by OMB under control number 1218-
0176, which OSHA included in the final rule published in the Federal
Register (84 FR 405). OSHA sought OMB approval of these requirements
under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), and, as required by that Act,
is announcing the approval for these requirements. A copy of the
approved ICR is available at https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAViewDocument?ref_nbr=201901-1218-001.
    The final rule amended the information collection requirements of
the recordkeeping regulation 29 CFR 1904.41 by rescinding the
requirement for establishments with 250 or more employees to
electronically submit information from OSHA Forms 300 and 301. The
final rule also established a new information collection requirement by
requiring covered employers to submit their Employer Identification
Number (EIN) electronically along with their injury and illness data
submission.
    The public already has had the opportunity to comment on the
information collection requirements and OMB has approved them on March
28, 2019. This announcement is to increase public awareness of OMB's
approval of the information collection requirements. In addition, 29
CFR 1904.45 displays the approved recordkeeping and reporting
information collection requirements, including 29 CFR 1904.41, with the
OMB control number, 1218-0176.

Authority and Signature

    Loren Sweatt, Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational
Safety and Health, directed the preparation of this document. The
authority for this document is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3506 et seq.) and Secretary of Labor's Order No. 1-2012 (77 FR
3912).

    Signed at Washington, DC, on June 21, 2019.
Loren Sweatt,
Acting Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health.
[FR Doc. 2019-15880 Filed 7-26-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-26-P


[Federal Register: September 28, 2005 (Volume 70, Number 187)]
[Notices]
[Page 56670]
[DOCID:fr28se05-102]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. RP05-673-000]

Viking Gas Transmission Company; Notice of Proposed Changes in
FERC Gas Tariff

September 20, 2005.
    Take notice that on September 15, 2005, Viking Gas Transmission
Company (Viking) tendered for filing to be part of its FERC Gas Tariff,
First Revised Volume No. 1, Fourteenth Revised Sheet No. 5B, to become
effective November 1, 2005.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed in accordance with the provisions of
Section 154.210 of the Commission's regulations (18 CFR 154.210).
Anyone filing an intervention or protest must serve a copy of that
document on the Applicant. Anyone filing an intervention or protest on
or before the intervention or protest date need not serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E5-5265 Filed 9-27-05; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 59 (Tuesday, March 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 18280-18282]
[FR Doc No: 2012-7246]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-66636; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2012-035]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To
Assess a Fee for the QView Service

March 21, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that, on March 15, 2012, The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (the ``Exchange''
or ``NASDAQ'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to assess a fee for the QView service, which
provides a subscribing member firm with increased transparency over its
trading activity on the Exchange by allowing the member to track its
Exchange order flow. The Exchange will implement the proposed fee
effective March 15, 2012.
    The text of the proposed rule change is below. Proposed new
language is in italics; proposed deletions are in brackets.

7058. QView

    QView is a web-based tool designed to give a subscribing member
the ability to track its order flow on Nasdaq, and create both real-
time and historical reports of such order flow. Members may
subscribe to QView for a fee of $600 per month, per member firm [at
no cost].
* * * * *

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange is proposing to assess a fee of $600 per month, per
member firm for subscription to QView effective March 15, 2012. The
Exchange initially adopted QView on December 1, 2011 at no cost to
subscribers.\3\ QView is a Web-based, front-end application, which
provides a subscribing member firm with increased transparency over its
trading activity on the Exchange by allowing the member firm to track
its Exchange order flow.\4\ In particular, a QView subscriber is able
to track all of its trading activity on the Exchange through detailed
order and execution summaries. QView provides a subscribing member with
statistics concerning the total number of executions, total volume,
dollar value of executions, executions by symbol, add versus remove,
buy versus sell, display versus non-display, number of open orders, use
of routing strategies and liquidity code designation. QView also
provides information concerning how the subscribing member firm ranks
in NASDAQ market activity as compared to other NASDAQ participants. The
data provided by QView is available to the subscribing member both in
real-time and historically. Subscribing member firms are also able to
export such data from QView to other systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 65851 (November 30,
2011), 76 FR 75924 (December 5, 2011) (SR-NASDAQ-2011-157).
    \4\ A subscribing member possessing multiple MPIDs must
designate the MPIDs for which it would like to receive QView
information. A subscribing member, however, may elect to monitor
only the activity occurring through certain ports associated with a
subscribed MPID. A member firm seeking to subscribe to QView that
accesses the Exchange through a sponsored arrangement with another
Exchange member must provide the Exchange with an executed sponsored
access data agreement prior to subscribing to QView. The sponsored
access data agreement makes clear that the subscribing member firm
is permitted to designate the sponsoring firm's MPID for
subscription to QView. A copy of this form may be found here: http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/content/productsservices/trading/QView/QView_SponsoredAccessAgreement.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A member firm must subscribe to NASDAQ TradeInfo \5\ to subscribe
to QView. QView was developed to work in conjunction with TradeInfo, so
that a subscriber to QView is able to seamlessly filter down to the
specific order or execution information of the orders and executions
provided in the QView dashboard interface. The dashboard also allows a
QView subscriber to track its executions and open orders in real-time,
as well as view its executions and open orders as an overall summary,
with all totals displayed by quantity, share volume, or dollar value.
As such, QView provides both an overall summary of a subscribing member
firm's activity, as well as detailed order and execution information,
thus providing the subscriber a comprehensive tool to track its trading
activity.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ TradeInfo is a web-based tool that, among other things,
allows users access to all of the NASDAQ order and execution
information for their entire firm for both equities and options
through a single interface. TradeInfo is offered complimentary as
part of the NASDAQ Workstation or separately for a fee of $95 per
user per month. See Rule 7015(f) (Securities Exchange Act Release
No. 55135 (January 19, 2007), 72 FR 3893 (January 26, 2007) (SR-
NASDAQ-2006-062)).
    \6\ For example, QView will inform a subscribing member of its
executions in a particular day and provide a link to the details of
those executions, which is provided by TradeInfo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A member firm that is a subscriber to QView as of March 14, 2012
may cancel its subscription to QView at any time prior to close of
business March 30, 2012 and not pay the proposed subscription fee.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ NASDAQ has provided notice to member firms of the March 30,
2012 cancelation date.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \8\ in that it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and
issuers and other persons using any facility or system which the
Exchange operates or controls, and it does not unfairly discriminate
between customers, issuers, brokers or dealers. The Exchange believes
that the proposed fee is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because member firms that voluntarily elect to subscribe to this
service will be charged the same fee. QView provides subscribing member
firms with a top down view of their trading activity on the Exchange
and the proposed fee is assessed on a per member firm basis. The value
of QView to a subscribing member firm is the convenience of aggregating
and displaying the firm's data in a single interface regardless of the
amount of data (executions, open orders, etc.) or the number of MPIDs
that the firm has. In this regard, the Exchange notes that the number
of MPIDs that a subscribing member firm possesses is not indicative of
quantity and value of the data provided by QView. In many cases, a firm
with a single MPID may in fact have more data than a firm with multiple
MPIDs. As such, the Exchange believes that it is equitable to assess
the fee on a per firm basis, as opposed to a per MPID basis. The
Exchange also believes that the proposed fee does not unfairly
discriminate because it is available to all member firms on equal terms
and there is no differentiation among member firms in regard to the fee
assessed to subscribers. In addition, the Exchange believes that it is
not unfair discrimination to limit the service to broker-dealers that
are members of the Exchange because it provides information solely
concerning a subscribing member firm's trading activity on the
Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange determined that the proposed fee is reasonable based
on member firm interest in QView, costs associated with developing and
supporting QView, and the value that QView provides to subscribing
member firms. The information provided by QView relates to the
subscribing member firm's activity on the Exchange and the member firm
may access and aggregate this information by other means, including its
own internal systems. As such, the Exchange believes that if a member
firm determines that the fee is not cost-efficient for its needs, it
may decline to subscribe to QView and access such information from
other sources. Finally, the maximum fee for a member that elects to
subscribe to this service, regardless of the number of MPIDs held by
the firm, is $600 per month. Subscription to QView is per member firm,
therefore a firm must subscribe only once to QView to receive the
service for as many of its MPIDs as it wishes.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. To
the contrary, the proposed rule change is pro-competitive in that it
will allow the Exchange to disseminate a new service on a voluntary
basis. QView

is voluntary on the part of the Exchange which is not required to offer
such products and services, and voluntary on the part of prospective
users that are not required to use it and may obtain the information
from other sources.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\9\ At any time within 60 days of the filing
of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily
suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the
protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml ); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2012-035 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2012-035. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2012-035 and should
be submitted on or before April 17, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-7246 Filed 3-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 151 (Tuesday, August 6, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38252-38253]
[FR Doc No: 2019-16792]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9997-75-OA]

Notification of a Public Teleconference of the Science Advisory
Board Computable General Equilibrium Model Review Panel

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Science Advisory
Board (SAB) Staff Office announces a public teleconference of the SAB
Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model Review Panel to discuss its
review of a CGE model from the EPA's National Center for Environmental
Economics.

DATES: The public teleconference will be held on August 22, 2019, from
12:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

ADDRESSES: The public teleconference will be held by telephone only.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Any member of the public wishing
further information regarding the public teleconference may contact Dr.
Holly Stallworth, Designated Federal Officer (DFO), SAB Staff Office,
by telephone at<PHONE_NUMBER> or email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
The SAB mailing address is U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board (1400R),
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460. General information about the SAB, including
information concerning the SAB teleconference announced in this notice,
can be found at the SAB web page at http://epa.gov/sab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Background: The SAB was established pursuant to the Environmental
Research, Development, and Demonstration Authorization Act (ERDAA)
codified at 42 U.S.C. 4365, to provide independent scientific and
technical peer review, advice, consultation, and recommendations to the
EPA Administrator on the technical basis for Agency positions and
regulations. The SAB is a Federal Advisory Committee chartered under
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C., App. 2. The SAB
will comply with the provisions of FACA and all appropriate SAB Staff
Office procedural policies.
    Pursuant to FACA and EPA policy, notice is hereby given that the
SAB CGE Model Review Panel will hold a public teleconference to discuss
its review of a CGE model from EPA's National Center for Environmental
Economics. The Panel will provide advice to the Administrator through
the chartered SAB. Background information on the SAB CGE Model Review
Panel can be found at https://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/02ad90b136fc21ef85256eba00436459/18a2abac2e4b5ec9852583bc004ce70a!OpenDocument.
    The public teleconference on August 22, 2019, will be an
orientation teleconference during which the National Center for
Environmental Economics will brief the Panel on the context for the
review, the CGE model itself and the charge questions. A face-to-face
meeting date and location will be announced at a later time.
    All draft reports developed by SAB panels, committees or workgroups
are reviewed and approved by the Chartered SAB through a quality review
process before being finalized and transmitted to the EPA
Administrator.
    Availability of the teleconference materials: An agenda will be
posted on the SAB website prior to the August 22, 2019, orientation
teleconference. Other materials to be posted prior to the public
teleconference include PowerPoint slides for all EPA presentations and
the charge questions. The CGE model source code and documentation as
well as memos on model versioning and potential near-term model
improvements will be posted shortly after the August 22, 2019,
teleconference. While the source code and documentation will be
available to the public, some of the data to run the model is
proprietary and would have to be purchased from The IMPLAN Group LLC
(implan.com). Instructions and source code to build the model's dataset
from the IMPLAN data will be posted. To locate teleconference
materials, go to http://epa.gov/sab">epa.gov/sab and click on ``Upcoming and Recent
Meetings'' to get to the SAB calendar. From the calendar, click on
August 22, 2019. For questions concerning EPA's review materials on its
CGE model, please contact Dr. Ann Wolverton, EPA National Center for
Environmental Economics at

<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Procedures for Providing Public Input: Public comment for
consideration by EPA's federal advisory committees and panels has a
different purpose from public comment provided to the EPA program
offices. Therefore, the process for submitting comments to a federal
advisory committee is different from the process used to submit
comments to an EPA program office. Federal advisory committees and
panels, including scientific advisory committees, provide independent
advice to the EPA. Members of the public can submit relevant comments
on the topic of this advisory activity, including the charge to the
panel and the EPA review documents, and/or the group conducting the
activity, for the SAB to consider during the advisory process. Input
from the public to the SAB will have the most impact if it consists of
comments that provide specific scientific or technical information or
analysis for the SAB panel to consider or if it relates to the clarity
or accuracy of the technical information.
    Oral Statements: In general, individuals or groups requesting an
oral presentation at the will be limited to five minutes per speaker.
Interested parties should contact Dr. Holly Stallworth, DFO, in writing
(preferably via email), at the contact information noted above by
August 15, 2019, to be placed on the list of public speakers for the
orientation teleconference.
    Written Statements: Written statements will be accepted throughout
the advisory process; however, for timely consideration by Committee/
Panel members, statements should be supplied to the DFO (preferably via
email) at the contact information noted above by August 15, 2019, for
consideration at the teleconference on August 22, 2019.
    It is the SAB Staff Office general policy to post written comments
on the web page for the advisory meeting or teleconference. Submitters
are requested to provide an unsigned version of each document because
the SAB Staff Office does not publish documents with signatures on its
website. Members of the public should be aware that their personal
contact information, if included in any written comments, may be posted
to the SAB website. Copyrighted material will not be posted without
explicit permission of the copyright holder.
    Accessibility: To request accommodation of a disability, please
contact Dr. Stallworth at<PHONE_NUMBER> or<EMAIL_ADDRESS>To
request accommodation of a disability please contact Dr. Stallworth,
preferably at least ten days prior to the teleconference, to give the
EPA as much time as possible to process your request.

    Dated: July 30, 2019.
Khanna Johnston,
Deputy Director, EPA Science Advisory Board Staff Office.
[FR Doc. 2019-16792 Filed 8-5-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P