[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 208 (Monday, November 1, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 60185-60186]
[FR Doc No: 2021-23564]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0918; Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-11]
RIN 2120-AA66

Proposed Amendment of United States Area Navigation (RNAV) Route
T-251; Central United States

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend United States Area Navigation
(RNAV) route T-251 in the central United States due to the
decommissioning of the Malden, MO, (MAW) VHF Omnidirectional Range
Tactical Air Navigation (VORTAC), in support of the VHF Omnidirectional
Range (VOR) Minimum Operational Network (MON) program for improved
efficiency of the National Airspace System (NAS) while reducing the
dependency on ground based navigational systems.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before December 16, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590; telephone: 1
(800) 647-5527 or<PHONE_NUMBER>. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-
2021-0918; Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-11 at the beginning of your
comments. You may also submit comments through the internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the
Rules and Regulations Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of FAA Order JO 7400.11F at NARA, email:
[email protected] or go to https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Gallant, Rules and Regulations
Group, Office of Policy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
8783.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Authority for This Rulemaking

    The FAA's authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the United States Code. Subtitle I, Section 106
describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the agency's
authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described
in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section,
the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of
the airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the
efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority as it would expand the availability of RNAV routes in the
NAS, increase airspace capacity, and reduce complexity in high air
traffic volume areas.

Comments Invited

    Interested parties are invited to participate in this proposed
rulemaking by submitting such written data, views, or arguments as they
may desire. Comments that provide the factual basis supporting the
views and suggestions presented are particularly helpful in developing
reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments are
specifically invited on the overall regulatory, aeronautical, economic,
environmental, and energy-related aspects of the proposal.
    Communications should identify both docket numbers (FAA Docket No.
FAA-2021-0918; Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-11 and be submitted in
triplicate to the Docket Management Facility (see ADDRESSES section for
address and phone number). You may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    Commenters wishing the FAA to acknowledge receipt of their comments
on this action must submit with those comments a self-addressed,
stamped postcard on which the following statement is made: ``Comments
to FAA Docket No. FAA-2021-0918; Airspace Docket No. 21-ACE-11.'' The
postcard will be date/time stamped and returned to the commenter.
    All communications received on or before the specified comment
closing date will be considered before taking action on the proposed
rule. The proposal contained in this action may be changed in light of
comments received. A report summarizing each substantive public contact
with FAA personnel concerned with this rulemaking will be filed in the
docket.

Availability of NPRM's

    An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov. Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through the FAA's web page at https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/airspace_amendments/.
    You may review the public docket containing the proposal, any
comments received and any final disposition in person in the Dockets
Office (see ADDRESSES section for address and phone number) between
9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. An informal docket may also be examined during normal
business hours at the office of the Eastern Service Center, Federal
Aviation Administration, Room 210, 1701 Columbia Ave., College Park, GA
30337.

Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference

    This document amends FAA Order JO 7400.11F, Airspace Designations
and Reporting Points, dated August 10, 2021 and effective September 15,
2021. FAA Order JO 7400.11F is publicly available as listed in the
ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order JO 7400.11F lists Class
A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, air traffic service routes, and
reporting points.

The Proposal

    The FAA is proposing an amendment to 14 CFR part 71 to amend RNAV
route T-251 by extending the route further south in the central United
States.
    T-251: T-251 currently extends from the Farmington, MO, (FAM)
VORTAC, north to the KOETZ, WI, waypoint (WP). The proposed amendment
would extend T-251 by 69 nautical miles to the south of the Farmington,
MO, VORTAC, to the new FRNIA, MO, WP. The FRNIA WP will replace the
Malden, MO, VORTAC, which is scheduled to be decommissioned. As
amended, T-251 would extend between the FRNIA, MO, WP, and the KOETZ,
WI, WP.

    United States Area Navigation routes are published in paragraph
6011 of FAA Order JO 7400.11F, dated August 10, 2021, and effective
September 15, 2021, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
The RNAV route listed in this document would be subsequently published
in FAA Order JO 7400.11.
    FAA Order JO 7400.11, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points,
is published yearly and effective on September 15.

Regulatory Notices and Analyses

    The FAA has determined that this proposed regulation only involves
an established body of technical regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to keep them operationally current.
It, therefore: (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a ``significant rule'' under
Department of Transportation (DOT) Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant preparation
of a regulatory evaluation as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will only affect air traffic
procedures and air navigation, it is certified that this proposed rule,
when promulgated, will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Environmental Review

    This proposal will be subject to an environmental analysis in
accordance with FAA Order 1050.1F, ``Environmental Impacts: Policies
and Procedures'' prior to any FAA final regulatory action.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71

    Airspace, Incorporation by reference, Navigation (air).

The Proposed Amendment

    In consideration of the foregoing, the Federal Aviation
Administration proposes to amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:

PART 71--DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND REPORTING POINTS

0
1. The authority citation for part 71 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959-1963 Comp., p. 389.

Sec.  71.1  [Amended]

0
2. The incorporation by reference in 14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO
7400.11F, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated August 10,
2021, and effective September 15, 2021, is amended as follows:

Paragraph 6011 United States Area Navigation Routes.

* * * * *

T-251 FRNIA, MO to KOETZ, WI [Amended]

FRNIA, MO                         WP                (Lat. 36[deg]33'18.69'' N, long. 089[deg]54'40.47'' W)
Farmington, MO (FAM)              VORTAC            (Lat. 37[deg]40'24.46'' N, long. 090[deg]14'02.62'' W)
Foristell, MO (FTZ)               VORTAC            (Lat. 38[deg]41'39.60'' N, long. 090[deg]58'16.57'' W)
RIVRS, IL                         FIX               (Lat. 39[deg]25'21.41'' N, long. 090[deg]55'56.70'' W)
KAYUU, MO                         WP                (Lat. 40[deg]19'05.81'' N, long. 091[deg]41'36.59'' W)
MERKR, IA                         WP                (Lat. 40[deg]49'16.02'' N, long. 092[deg]08'26.88'' W)
AGENS, IA                         FIX               (Lat. 41[deg]01'43.78'' N, long. 092[deg]20'50.25'' W)
PICRA, IA                         WP                (Lat. 41[deg]35'00.72'' N, long. 092[deg]32'34.29'' W)
HAVOS, IA                         WP                (Lat. 42[deg]04'16.32'' N, long. 092[deg]28'29.38'' W)
Waterloo, IA (ALO)                VOR/DME           (Lat. 42[deg]33'23.39'' N, long. 092[deg]23'56.13'' W)
ZEZDU, IA                         FIX               (Lat. 42[deg]49'29.02'' N, long. 092[deg]04'58.05'' W)
FALAR, MN                         FIX               (Lat. 43[deg]34'26.04'' N, long. 091[deg]30'18.32'' W)
KOETZ, WI                         WP                (Lat. 44[deg]13'15.00'' N, long. 091[deg]28'14.00'' W)

* * * * *

    Issued in Washington, DC, on October 25, 2021.
Michael R. Beckles,
Acting Manager, Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2021-23564 Filed 10-29-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: December 12, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 240)]
[Notices]
[Page 75702]
[DOCID:fr12de08-61]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. CP09-27-000]

Southern Natural Gas Company; Notice of Application

December 8, 2008.
    Take notice that on November 26, 2008, Southern Natural Gas Company
(Southern), 569 Brookwood Village, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama
35209, filed in the above referenced docket an application pursuant to
section 7(b) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and part 157 of the
Commission's regulations, for an order approving the abandonment of
approximately 97 miles of pipe in various segments and appurtenant
facilities located on Southern's North Main Loop Pipeline in Sharkey,
Yazoo, Winston, Noxubee, and Lowndes Counties, Mississippi, and Pickens
and Tuscaloosa Counties, Alabama, and abandonment of three small
compressor units at Southern's Onward Compressor Station in Sharkey
County, Mississippi. Southern also proposes to make certain
modifications that will allow Southern to continue meeting its firm
capacity requirements on the North Main Line and the North Main 2nd
Loop Line, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on
file with the Commission and open to public inspection. The filing is
available for review at the Commission in the Public Reference Room or
may be viewed on the Commission's Web site web at http://www.ferc.gov
using the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last
three digits in the docket number field to access the document. For
assistance, contact FERC at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-
free,<PHONE_NUMBER> or TTY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Any questions concerning this application may be directed to
Patrick B. Pope, Vice President and General Counsel, Southern Natural
Gas Company, 569 Brookwood Village, Suite 501, Birmingham, Alabama
35209 at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or Patricia S. Francis, Senior Counsel,
Southern Natural Gas Company, 569 Brookwood Village, Suite 501,
Birmingham, Alabama 35209 at<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    There are two ways to become involved in the Commission's review of
this project. First, any person wishing to obtain legal status by
becoming a party to the proceedings for this project should, on or
before the comment date stated below file with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, a
motion to intervene in accordance with the requirements of the
Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.214 or
385.211) and the Regulations under the NGA (18 CFR 157.10). A person
obtaining party status will be placed on the service list maintained by
the Secretary of the Commission and will receive copies of all
documents filed by the applicant and by all other parties. A party must
submit 14 copies of filings made in the proceeding with the Commission
and must mail a copy to the applicant and to every other party. Only
parties to the proceeding can ask for court review of Commission orders
in the proceeding.
    However, a person does not have to intervene in order to have
comments considered. The second way to participate is by filing with
the Secretary of the Commission, as soon as possible, an original and
two copies of comments in support of or in opposition to this project.
The Commission will consider these comments in determining the
appropriate action to be taken, but the filing of a comment alone will
not serve to make the filer a party to the proceeding. The Commission's
rules require that persons filing comments in opposition to the project
provide copies of their protests only to the party or parties directly
involved in the protest.
    Persons who wish to comment only on the environmental review of
this project should submit an original and two copies of their comments
to the Secretary of the Commission. Environmental commentors will be
placed on the Commission's environmental mailing list, will receive
copies of the environmental documents, and will be notified of meetings
associated with the Commission's environmental review process.
Environmental commentors will not be required to serve copies of filed
documents on all other parties. However, the non-party commentors will
not receive copies of all documents filed by other parties or issued by
the Commission (except for the mailing of environmental documents
issued by the Commission) and will not have the right to seek court
review of the Commission's final order.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should
submit an original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: December 29, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E8-29471 Filed 12-11-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 101 (Thursday, May 24, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24030-24033]
[FR Doc No: 2018-11068]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0323; FRL-9978-45--Region 5]

Air Plan Approval; Illinois; Volatile Organic Compounds
Definition

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is approving a state
submission as a revision to the Illinois state implementation plan
(SIP). The revision, submitted on May 30, 2017, incorporates changes to
the Illinois Administrative Code (IAC) definition of ``volatile organic
material'' or ``volatile organic compounds'' (VOC). The revision
removes recordkeeping and emission reporting requirements related to
the use of tertiary butyl acetate (also known as t-butyl acetate) as a
VOC. The revision is consistent with an EPA 2016 rulemaking related to
tertiary butyl acetate. In addition, Illinois' submission includes the
addition of chemical identification information to the list of
compounds excluded from the definition of VOC and the deletion of an
unnecessary phrase in the definition of VOC. EPA proposed this action
on November 2, 2017, and received one public comment in response.

DATES: This final rule is effective on June 25, 2018.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-R05-OAR-2017-0323. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted
by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is
not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard
copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either
through www.regulations.gov or at the Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604. This facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays. We recommend
that you telephone Charles Hatten, Environmental Engineer, (312) 886-
6031 before visiting the Region 5 office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Hatten, Environmental
Engineer, Control Strategies Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J),
Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard,
Chicago, Illinois 60604,<PHONE_NUMBER>, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA. This supplementary information
section is arranged as follows:

I. What is the background for this action?
II. Public Comment Received and EPA's Response
III. What action is EPA taking?
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. What is the background for this action?

    On May 30, 2017, Illinois submitted, as a SIP revision, a request
to revise and update the definition of VOC at Part 211, Subpart B,
Section 7150 (35 IAC 211.7150). Illinois also submitted corrections to
chemical names and revisions to chemical identifiers included in the
list of compounds excluded from the definition of VOC at 35 IAC
211.7150(a) and a minor deletion of an unnecessary phrase in 35 IAC
211.7150(d).
    The revision addresses an existing exemption related to defining
tertiary butyl acetate as a VOC. Before this action, the Illinois SIP
excluded this compound from the definition of VOC for purposes of VOC
emission limitations and VOC content requirements, but defined the
compound as a VOC for all recordkeeping, emissions reporting,
photochemical dispersion modeling and inventory requirements that apply
to VOC. (69 FR 69298, November 29, 2004). This approach was consistent
with EPA's regulation of tertiary butyl acetate at the time this
portion of the SIP was originally approved. (64 FR 52731, September 30,
1999).
    On February 25, 2016, EPA promulgated a final rule amending the
definition of VOC to remove the recordkeeping, emissions reporting,
photochemical dispersion modeling and inventory requirements related to
the use of tertiary butyl acetate as a VOC. (81 FR 9339, codified at 40
CFR 51.100(s)). See 82 FR 50812 for a more detailed summary of the
basis for EPA's 2016 rulemaking. In order to conform to EPA's current
definition, Illinois revised its definition of VOC to remove the
recordkeeping, emissions reporting, photochemical dispersion modeling
and inventory requirements for tertiary butyl acetate within the
definition of VOC (35 IAC 211.7150).
    Additionally, Illinois amended the list of excluded compounds in 35
IAC 211.7150 by adding the International Union of Pure and Applied
Chemistry (IUPAC) names \1\ and CAS registry numbers,\2\ and presenting
common names parenthetically.\3\ Illinois made these changes to
eliminate confusion and make it easier to identify specific excluded
compounds in 35 IAC 211.7150(a). These changes did not alter the list
of excluded compounds and are consistent with the Federal list of
excluded compounds in 40 CFR 51.100(s). Finally, Illinois made a minor
administrative change by deleting the words ``of this Section'' in 35
IAC 211.7150(d), which discusses appropriate testing methods and
includes a reference to subsection (b) of 35 IAC 211.7150.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ IUPAC has developed a recognized system of nomenclature for
chemical compounds.
    \2\ Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) numbers are developed by the
American Chemical Society. CAS numbers are in widespread use and
provide clarity because a single CAS number identifies only one
chemical isomer.
    \3\ In Table 6 of Attachment 7 to Illinois' submittal, Illinois
lists the chemical compounds excluded from the definition of VOC,
using the designations by EPA, IUPAC names, CAS numbers, and
commonly used alternative names for each.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On November 2, 2017, EPA published a proposed rule approving
Illinois' requested revision to the SIP at 35 IAC 211.7150 and
providing a 30-day public comment period. (82 FR 50853, published in
parallel with a Direct Final Rule that was subsequently withdrawn, see
82 FR 50811, 60545).

II. Public Comment Received and EPA's Response

    EPA received one adverse comment on the proposed approval of the
Illinois definition of VOC.
    Comment: The commenter stated that EPA should not approve this SIP
submission because EPA should not have added tertiary butyl acetate to
the list of exempted compounds, given that it is a highly reactive and
volatile compound. The commenter also asserted that EPA should not have
removed the reporting requirement because EPA had previously required
recordkeeping and reporting so that it could determine further
restrictions. The commenter further stated that ``EPA should have
enforced the reporting requirement, analyised [sic] the data and
determined whether or not tertiary butyl acetate should be further
regulated.''
    EPA's Response: This comment is not applicable to this action,
which merely relies on EPA's previous actions and did not require a
technical record supporting exclusion of tertiary butyl acetate from
the definition of VOC.
    The comment primarily concerns two separate EPA actions related to
tertiary butyl acetate, the exclusion of the compound from the
definition of VOC and the removal of related recordkeeping and
reporting requirements, which were taken in 2004 and 2016,
respectively. See 69 FR 69298 and 81 FR 9339. EPA provided public
comment periods for these actions and responded to any adverse comments
received as required by Federal law. In addition, the comment relates
to EPA's approval in July 16, 2008, of Illinois' rule excluding
tertiary butyl acetate as a VOC (73 FR 40748). These are issues on
which the commenter would be precluded from obtaining judicial review,
as the time period to challenge these EPA actions has passed. See
Section 307(b) of the Clean Air Act (CAA).
    Nevertheless, EPA notes that it has previously addressed the
commenter's concerns in the preambles to the final rules referenced
above. Those documents discuss in great detail the nature of VOCs,
EPA's approach to organic compounds with a negligible level of
reactivity, the chemical characteristics of tertiary butyl acetate, and
the bases for EPA's 2004 and 2016 decisions to exclude tertiary butyl
acetate from the definition of VOC and remove the recordkeeping and
emission reporting requirements related to tertiary butyl acetate as a
VOC.

III. What action is EPA taking?

    EPA is approving, as a SIP revision, the removal of the
recordkeeping and emission reporting requirements applicable to
tertiary butyl acetate as a VOC at 35 IAC 211.7150(e), the addition of
chemical identification information for excluded compounds in 35 IAC
211.7150(a), and the removal of the phrase ``of this Section'' in 35
IAC 211.7150(d) contained in the May 30, 2017, submittal.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the Illinois
Regulations described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents
generally available through www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region
5 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information).
Therefore, these materials have been approved by EPA for inclusion in
the State implementation plan, have been incorporated by reference by
EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110
and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of
EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the CAA and applicable
Federal regulations.

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA's role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the
criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law
as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this
action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 23, 2018. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: May 10, 2018.
Cathy Stepp,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.

    40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

0
2. In Sec.  52.720, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry ``211.7150'' to read as follows:

Sec.  52.720  Identification of plan.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *

                                 EPA-Approved Illinois Regulations and Statutes
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                      State
      Illinois citation           Title/subject     effective    EPA approval date            Comments
                                                       date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                  Part 211: Definitions and General Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             Subpart B: Definitions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                  * * * * * * *
211.7150.....................  Volatile Organic      1/23/2017  5/24/2018, [insert  ............................
                                Material (VOM) Or                Federal Register
                                Volatile Organic                 citation].
                                Compound (VOC).

                                                  * * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2018-11068 Filed 5-23-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 177 (Friday, September 12, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 54727]
[FR Doc No: 2014-21727]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0110]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office
of Management and Budget Approval; Prescription Drug Advertisements

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
collection of information entitled ``Prescription Drug Advertisements''
has been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FDA PRA Staff, Office of Operations,
Food and Drug Administration, 8455 Colesville Rd., COLE-14526, Silver
Spring, MD 20993-0002<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On June 12, 2014, the Agency submitted a
proposed collection of information entitled ``Prescription Drug
Advertisements'' to OMB for review and clearance under 44 U.S.C. 3507.
An Agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently
valid OMB control number. OMB has now approved the information
collection and has assigned OMB control number 0910-0686. The approval
expires on August 31, 2017. A copy of the supporting statement for this
information collection is available on the Internet at http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.

    Dated: September 8, 2014.
Leslie Kux,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. 2014-21727 Filed 9-11-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 158 (Monday, August 17, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49298-49299]
[FR Doc No: 2015-20289]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment on Surplus Property
Release at Madras Municipal Airport, Madras, OR

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the provisions of Title 49, U.S.C. Section 47153(c),
notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request from the
City of Madras, OR, to waive the surplus property requirements for
approximately 1.07 acres of airport property located at Madras
Municipal Airport, in Madras, OR.
    The subject property is located away from the aeronautical area and
currently vacant. The property will remain vacant of any structures, as
it will be utilized for public road improvements and right of way
purposes only. This release will allow the City to sell parcels of the
airport property to businesses interested in the airport industrial
park. There will be no actual proceeds generated from the proposed
release of this property as it will be used for public road
improvements and right-of-way purposes. It has been determined through
study that the subject parcels will not be needed for aeronautical
purposes.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before September 30, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments on this document to Ms. Cayla Morgan at the
Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington, 98057-3356, Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Documents are available for review by
appointment by contacting Ms. Cayla Morgan, Telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>,
Federal Aviation Administration, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton,
Washington.

     Issued in Renton, Washington on August 11, 2015.
Joelle Briggs,
Assistant, Manager, Seattle Airports District Office.
[FR Doc. 2015-20289 Filed 8-14-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register: October 21, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 202)]
[Notices]
[Page 54052-54053]
[DOCID:fr21oc09-61]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-D-0508]

Draft Guidance for Industry on Registration and Product Listing
for Owners and Operators of Domestic Tobacco Product Establishments;
Availability

AGENCY:  Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION:  Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY:  The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled ``Registration
and Product Listing for Owners and Operators of Domestic Tobacco
Product Establishments.'' The draft guidance document is intended to
assist persons making tobacco product establishment registration and
product listing submissions to FDA under The Family Smoking Prevention
and Tobacco Control Act (FSPTCA).

DATES:  Although you can comment on any guidance at any time (see 21
CFR 10.115(g)(5)), to ensure that the agency considers your comment on
this draft guidance before it begins work on the final version of the
guidance, submit written or electronic comments on the draft guidance
by October 30, 2009.

ADDRESSES:  Submit written requests for single copies of the draft
guidance document entitled ``Registration and Product Listing for
Owners and Operators of Domestic Tobacco Product Establishments'' to
the Center for Tobacco Products, Food and Drug Administration, 9200
Corporate Blvd., Rockville, MD 20850-3229. Send one self-addressed
adhesive label to assist that office in processing your request or
include a fax number to which the draft guidance document may be sent.
See the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the
guidance document.
    Submit written comments on the guidance to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane,
rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit electronic comments to http://
www.regulations.gov. Identify comments with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this document.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Michele Mital, Center for Tobacco
Products, Food and Drug Administration, 9200 Corporate Blvd.,
Rockville, MD 20850-3229,<PHONE_NUMBER><EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

    On June 22, 2009, the President signed the FSPTCA (Public Law 111-
31) into law. The FSPTCA amended the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 301 et seq.) by, among other things, adding a
new chapter granting FDA important new authority to regulate the
manufacture, marketing, and distribution of tobacco products to protect
the public health generally and to reduce tobacco use by minors.
    Section 905(b) of the act (21 U.S.C. 395(b)), as amended by the
FSPTCA, requires that ``every person who owns or operates any
establishment in any State engaged in the manufacture, preparation,
compounding, or processing of a tobacco product or tobacco products''
register with FDA the name, places of business, and all establishments
owned or operated by that person. Every person must register by
December 31 of each year. Section 905(i)(1) of the act, as amended by
the FSPTCA, requires that all registrants ``shall, at the time of
registration under any such subsection, file with [FDA] a list of all
tobacco products which are being manufactured, prepared, compounded, or
processed by that person for commercial distribution,'' along with
certain accompanying consumer information, such as all labeling and a
representative sampling of advertisements.
    While electronic submission of registration and listing information
is not required, FDA is strongly encouraging electronic submission to
facilitate efficiency and timeliness of data management and collection.
To that end, FDA designed the eSubmitter application to streamline the
data entry process for registration and product listing. This tool
allows for importation of large quantities of structured data,
attachments of files (e.g., in portable document format (PDFs) and
certain media files), and automatic acknowledgement of FDA's receipt of
submissions.

II. Significance of Guidance

    FDA is issuing this draft guidance document consistent with FDA's
good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The draft guidance,
when finalized, will represent the agency's current thinking on
``Registration and Product Listing for Owners and Operators of Domestic
Tobacco Product Establishments.'' It does not create or confer any
rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the
public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies
the requirements of the applicable statute and regulations.

III. Comments

    Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written or electronic comments regarding this document.
Submit a single copy of electronic comments or two paper copies of any
mailed comments, except that individuals may submit one paper copy.
Comments are to be identified with the docket number found in brackets
in the heading of this document. The guidance document and received
comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets Management between 9
a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.

IV. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995

    This draft guidance contains proposed collections of information
that are subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
As required by the PRA, FDA has published an analysis of, among others,
the information collection concerning the submission of tobacco product
establishment registration and product listing information (74 FR
45219, September 1, 2009, as corrected by 74 FR 47257, September 15,
2009) and will submit them for OMB approval.

V. Electronic Access

    An electronic version of the guidance document is available on the
Internet at http://www.regulations.gov and http://www.fda.gov/
TobaccoProducts/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm.

    Dated: October 15, 2009.
David Horowitz,
Assistant Commissioner for Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-25235 Filed 10-16-09; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 4160-01-S


[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 95 (Wednesday, May 19, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 27079]
[FR Doc No: 2021-10538]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL21-72-000]

LS Power Development, LLC, Doswell Limited Partnership v. PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.; Notice of Complaint

    Take notice that on May 7, 2021, pursuant to sections 206, and 306
of the Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e, 825e and Rule 206 of the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (Commission) Rules of Practice
and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.206, LS Power Development, LLC and Doswell
Limited Partnership (Complainants) filed a formal complaint against PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C., (Respondent or PJM) alleging that the
Respondent violated the Reliability Assurance Agreement among Load
Serving Entities in the PJM Region by approving FRR Alternative
elections by entities whose FRR Capacity Plans did not demonstrate the
commitment of capacity resources to meet their capacity obligations for
the full term of the elections, all as more fully explained in the
complaint.
    The Complainant certifies that copies of the complaint were served
on the contacts listed for Respondent in the Commission's list of
Corporate Officials, and on the Independent Market Monitor for PJM.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission strongly encourages electronic filings of comments,
protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link
at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically may mail
similar pleadings to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426. Hand delivered submissions in
docketed proceedings should be delivered to Health and Human Services,
12225 Wilkins Avenue, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
    In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the
Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an
opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the
internet through the Commission's Home Page (http://www.ferc.gov) using
the ``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. At this time,
the Commission has suspended access to the Commission's Public
Reference Room, due to the proclamation declaring a National Emergency
concerning the Novel Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19), issued by the
President on March 13, 2020. For assistance, contact the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call toll-free,
(886) 208-3676 or TYY,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on May 27, 2021.

    Dated: May 13, 2021.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-10538 Filed 5-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: December 19, 2007 (Volume 72, Number 243)]
[Notices]
[Page 71986-71988]
[DOCID:fr19de07-136]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-56956; File No. SR-ISE-2007-110]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; International Securities Exchange,
LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Relating to the $1 Strike
Pilot Program

December 13, 2007.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on November 14, 2007, the International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been substantially
prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    ISE proposes to expand the $1 Strike Pilot Program (``Pilot
Program'') and requests permanent approval of the Pilot Program. The
text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange, the
Commission's Public Reference Room, and http://www.ise.com.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
Sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The purpose of the proposed rule change is to expand the Pilot
Program and to request permanent approval of

the Pilot Program.\3\ The Pilot Program currently allows ISE to select
a total of 5 individual stocks on which an option series may be listed
at $1 strike price intervals. In order to be eligible for selection
into the Pilot Program, the underlying stock must close below $20 in
its primary market on the previous trading day. If selected for the
Pilot Program, the Exchange may list strike prices at $1 intervals from
$3 to $20, but no $1 strike price may be listed that is greater than $5
from the underlying stock's closing price in its primary market on the
previous day. The Exchange also may list $1 strikes on any other option
class designated by other securities exchanges that employ a similar
Pilot Program under their respective rules. The Exchange may not list
long-term option series (LEAPS) at $1 strike price intervals for any
class selected for the Pilot Program. The Exchange also is restricted
from listing any series that would result in strike prices being $0.50
apart.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ The Commission approved the Pilot Program on June 16, 2003.
See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 48033 (June 16, 2003), 68 FR
37036 (June 20, 2003) (SR-ISE-2003-17). The Pilot Program has
subsequently been extended through June 5, 2008. See Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 49827 (June 8, 2004), 69 FR 33966 (June
17, 2004) (SR-ISE-2004-21) (extending the Pilot Program until August
5, 2004); 50060 (July 22, 2004), 69 FR 45864 (July 30, 2004) (SR-
ISE-2004-26) (extending the Pilot Program for 10 months until June
5, 2005); 51769 (May 31, 2005), 70 FR 33232 (June 7, 2005) (SR-ISE-
2005-22) (extending the Pilot Program until June 5, 2006); 53806
(May 15, 2006), 71 FR 29694 (May 23, 2006) (SR-ISE-2006-20)
(extending the Pilot Program until June 5, 2007); and 55715 (May 7,
2007), 72 FR 26854 (May 11, 2007) (SR-ISE-2007-26) (extending the
Pilot Program until June 5, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to expand the Pilot Program to allow ISE to
select a total of 10 individual stocks on which an option series may be
listed at $1 strike price intervals. Additionally, ISE proposes to
expand the price range on which it may list $1 strikes from $3 to $50.
The existing restrictions on listing $1 strikes would continue, i.e.,
no $1 strike price may be listed that is greater than $5 from the
underlying stock's closing price in its primary market on the previous
day, and ISE is restricted from listing any series that would result in
strike prices being $0.50 apart.
    As stated in the Commission order approving ISE's Pilot Program and
in the subsequent extensions of the Pilot Program,\4\ ISE believes that
$1 strike price intervals provide investors with greater flexibility in
the trading of equity options that overlie lower priced stocks by
allowing investors to establish equity options positions that are
better tailored to meet their investment objectives. The Exchange
states that its member firms representing customers have repeatedly
requested that ISE seek to expand the Pilot Program, both in terms of
the number of classes on which an option series may be listed at $1
strike price intervals and the range in which $1 strikes may be listed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    With regard to the impact on systems capacities, ISE's analysis of
the Pilot Program shows that the impact on the automated systems of
ISE, the Options Price Reporting Authority (``OPRA''), and market data
vendors has been minimal. The Exchange analyzed the quoting activity
for all classes selected for the Pilot Program as a percentage of all
quoting activity for all classes being quoted during the specified
number of months.\5\ The Exchange concluded that, prior to the
implementation of the Pilot Program in May 2003, the number of Best
Bid/Offer (``BBO'') quotes sent to OPRA in the five classes selected
for the Pilot Program represented approximately 0.47% of all BBO quotes
sent by the Exchange.\6\ As of April 2007, the BBO quote share in the
five classes selected for the Pilot Program remained below May 2003
levels in all months analyzed by the Exchange, with the exception of
one month, February 2005.\7\ The Exchange notes that these statistics
may overstate the contribution of $1 strike prices because these
figures also include quotes for options series listed in intervals
higher than $1 (i.e., $2.50 strikes) in the same option classes. Even
with the non-$1 strike series quotes included in these figures, ISE
believes that the overall impact on capacity is still minimal. ISE
represents that is has sufficient capacity to handle an expansion of
the Pilot Program, as proposed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 55715 (May 7, 2007),
72 FR 26854 (May 11, 2007) (SR-ISE-2007-26), Exhibit 3, Pilot
Program Report (providing empirical analyses of the impact of the
Pilot Program on the capacity of automated systems during years 2003
to 2007).
    \6\ Id.
    \7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange believes that the Pilot Program has provided investors
with greater trading opportunities and flexibility and the ability to
more closely tailor their investment strategies and decisions to the
movement of the underlying security. Furthermore, the Exchange has not
detected any material proliferation of illiquid option series resulting
from the narrower strike price intervals. For these reasons, ISE
requests that the Pilot Program be approved on a permanent basis.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\8\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in that the rules of an
exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national
market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public
interest. The Exchange believes that expanding the Pilot Program will
result in a continuing benefit to investors by giving them more
flexibility to closely tailor their investment decisions in a greater
number of securities and for a more extended period of time than
currently permitted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change does not impose
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange has not solicited comments on the proposed rule change
and has not received any unsolicited written comments from members or
other interested parties.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    Within 35 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which ISE consents, the Commission will:
    A. By order approve such proposed rule change, or
    B. Institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,

including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml.
); or     Send an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include

File Number SR-ISE-2007-110 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Nancy M. Morris,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.
    All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-110. This
file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used.
To help the Commission process and review your comments more
efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all
comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml
). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments,

all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that
are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating
to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person,
other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance
with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection
and copying in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street,
NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours
of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2007-110 and should be
submitted on or before January 9, 2008.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E7-24535 Filed 12-18-07; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: February 21, 2006 (Volume 71, Number 34)]
[Notices]
[Page 8848]
[DOCID:fr21fe06-42]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EC06-76-000]

DeGreeffpa, LLC; Bendwind, LLC; Sierra Wind, LLC; Groen Wind,
LLC; Larswind, LLC; TAIR Windfarm, LLC; Hillcrest Wind, LLC; East Ridge
Transmission, LLC; and Storm Lake Power Partners I LLC; Notice of
Filing

February 13, 2006.
    Take notice that on February 8, 2006, DeGreeffpa, LLC (DeGreeffpa),
Bendwind, LLC (Bendwind), Sierra Wind, LLC (Sierra), Groen Wind, LLC
(Groen), Larswind, LLC (Larswind), TAIR Windfarm, LLC (TAIR), Hillcrest
Wind, LLC (Hillcrest) (collectively, East Ridge Projects), East Ridge
Transmission, LLC (East Ridge Transmission), and Storm Lake Power
Partners I LLC (Storm Lake) (the East Ridge Projects, East Ridge
Transmission, and Storm Lake, together, Applicants) submitted an
application pursuant to section 203 of the Federal Power Act for
authorization for the indirect disposition of jurisdictional facilities
resulting from a corporate reorganization that will transfer Edison
Capital's indirect upstream ownership interests in Applicants from
Edison Capital to its affiliate Edison Mission Energy.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicants. On or before the comment date, it is
not necessary to serve motions to intervene or protests on persons
other than the Applicants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov.
 Persons unable to file electronically should submit an

original and 14 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible online at http://www.ferc.gov, using the

``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For

TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on March 1, 2006.

Magalie R. Salas,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E6-2376 Filed 2-17-06; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 92 (Monday, May 13, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20871-20872]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09719]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket Nos. CP17-66-000; CP17-67-000]

Venture Global Plaquemines LNG, LLC and Venture Global Gator
Express, LLC; Notice of Availability of the Final Environmental Impact
Statement for the Proposed Plaquemines LNG and Gator Express Pipeline
Project

    The staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) has prepared a final environmental impact statement (EIS)
for the Plaquemines LNG and Gator Express Pipeline Project, proposed by
Venture Global Plaquemines LNG, LLC and Venture Global Gator Express,
LLC in the above-referenced dockets. Venture Global requests
authorization to construct and operate a new liquefied natural gas
(LNG) export terminal and associated facilities along the west bank of
the Mississippi River in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana (Terminal) and
to construct and operate two new 42-inch-diameter natural gas pipeline
laterals that would connect to the LNG Terminal. The new liquefaction
facilities would have a nameplate production capacity of 20.0 million
metric tons per annum (MTPA) of LNG and peak production capacity of 24
MTPA.
    The final EIS assesses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the Plaquemines LNG and Gator Express
Pipeline Project in accordance with the requirements of the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). The FERC staff concludes that approval
of the proposed project, with the mitigation measures recommended in
the final EIS, would have some adverse environmental impacts. These
impacts would be reduced to less-than-significant levels with the
implementation of Venture Global's proposed mitigation measures and the
additional measures recommended in the final EIS.
    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, U.S. Coast Guard, U.S. Department
of Energy, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, and U.S. Department of
Transportation participated as cooperating agencies in the preparation

of the EIS. Cooperating agencies have jurisdiction by law or special
expertise with respect to resources potentially affected by the
proposal and participate in the NEPA analysis. Although the cooperating
agencies provided input to the conclusions and recommendations
presented in the EIS, the agencies will present their own conclusions
and recommendations in their respective Records of Decision for the
project.
    The final EIS addresses the potential environmental effects of the
construction and operation of the following project facilities:
     LNG Terminal: Construction and operation of various
liquefaction, LNG distribution, and appurtenant facilities within the
boundaries of the site leased by Venture Global on the Mississippi
River, including:
    [cir] Six pretreatment facilities (three in each phase);
    [cir] a liquefaction plant with 18 integrated single-mixed
refrigerant blocks and support facilities (otherwise referred to as
liquefaction blocks or blocks) to be constructed in two phases (nine
blocks in each phase);
    [cir] four 200,000-cubic-meter aboveground LNG storage tanks;
    [cir] three LNG loading docks within a common LNG berthing area;
and
    [cir] air-cooled electric power generation facilities.
     Pipeline System: Construction and operation of two
parallel 42-inch-diameter natural gas pipelines that share one right-
of-way corridor for the majority of their respective routes and
appurtenant aboveground facilities, including the following:
    [cir] 15.1-mile-long Southwest Lateral Tennessee Gas Pipeline, LLC
(TGP) Pipeline;
    [cir] 11.7-mile-long Southwest Lateral Texas Eastern Transmission,
LP (TETCO) Pipeline;
    [cir] TGP metering and regulation station; and
    [cir] TETCO metering and regulation station.
    The Commission mailed a copy of the Notice of Availability to
federal, state, and local government representatives and agencies;
elected officials; environmental and public interest groups; Native
American tribes; potentially affected landowners and other interested
individuals and groups; and newspapers and libraries in the project
area. The final EIS is only available in electronic format. It may be
viewed and downloaded from the FERC's website (www.ferc.gov), on the
Environmental Documents page (https://www.ferc.gov/industries/gas/enviro/eis.asp). In addition, the final EIS may be accessed by using
the eLibrary link on the FERC's website. Click on the eLibrary link
(https://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/elibrary.asp), click on General
Search, and enter the docket number in the ``Docket Number'' field,
excluding the last three digits (i.e., CP17-66 or CP17-67). Be sure you
have selected an appropriate date range. For assistance, please contact
FERC Online Support at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or toll free at (866)
208-3676, or for TTY, contact<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at (866) 208-FERC, or on the
FERC website (www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. The eLibrary link
also provides access to the texts of all formal documents issued by the
Commission, such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
    In addition, the Commission offers a free service called
eSubscription that allows you to keep track of all formal issuances and
submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time you
spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries, and direct links to
the documents. Go to www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp.

    Dated: May 3, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-09719 Filed 5-10-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 51 (Tuesday, March 17, 2015)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13758-13760]
[FR Doc No: 2015-05717]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2014-0653; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-057-AD;
Amendment 39-18113; AD 2015-05-03]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier, Inc. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440)
airplanes. This AD was prompted by reports of cracking on the skin
panels and skin splice joints and angles at certain stringers at
various locations between certain fuselage stations. This AD requires
revising the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate new or revised maintenance requirements and airworthiness
limitations, and incorporating structural repairs and modifications to
preclude widespread fatigue damage (WFD). We are issuing this AD to
detect and correct WFD, which could adversely affect the structural
integrity of the airplane.

DATES: This AD becomes effective April 21, 2015.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in this AD as of April 21,
2015.

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0653 or in person at the
Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC.
    For service information identified in this AD, contact Bombardier,
Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval, Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9,
Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com. You
may view this referenced service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For information
on the availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It
is also available on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2014-0653.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Aziz Ahmed, Aerospace Engineer,
Airframe and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE-171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office (ACO), 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Bombardier, Inc.
Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes. The NPRM
published in the Federal Register on October 1, 2014 (79 FR 59157). The
NPRM was prompted by reports of cracking on the skin panels and skin
splice joints and angles at certain stringers at various locations
between certain fuselage stations. The NPRM proposed to require
revising the maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, to
incorporate new or revised maintenance requirements and airworthiness
limitations, and incorporating structural repairs and modifications to
preclude WFD. We are issuing this AD to detect and correct WFD, which
could adversely affect the structural integrity of the airplane.
    Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-
2014-07, dated January 31, 2014 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-
2B19 (Regional Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes. The MCAI states:

    Complete aeroplane fatigue testing on a CL-600-2B19 aeroplane by
the aeroplane manufacturer revealed the onset of simultaneous
cracking on the skin panels and skin splice joints and angles at
stringers number 6 and 20 at various locations

between fuselage stations (FS) 409.00 to FS 589.00.
    Cracks at multiple locations may reduce the residual strength of
the joint below the required levels if the cracks are not detectable
under the existing maintenance program established at the time of
certification. This multiple site damage (MSD) behavior, if not
corrected, could lead to widespread fatigue damage (WFD) and
adversely affect the structural integrity of the aeroplane and/or
could result in rapid decompression of the aeroplane.
    A Temporary Revision (TR) has been made to the Maintenance
Requirements Manual (MRM) to revise existing Airworthiness
Limitations (AWL) tasks and introduce new inspection tasks for the
detection of MSD. The aeroplane manufacturer is also developing a
structural modification to preclude WFD from occurring in the fleet
at these locations.
    This [Canadian] AD mandates the incorporation of the new and
revised AWL tasks [into the maintenance program], and a structural
modification to preclude WFD.

You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2014-0653-0003.

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We received no valid comments on the NPRM (79 FR 59157,
October 1, 2014) or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data and determined that air safety and
the public interest require adopting this AD as proposed except for
minor editorial changes. We have determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (79 FR 59157, October 1, 2014) for correcting the unsafe
condition; and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (79 FR 59157, October 1, 2014).

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    We reviewed the following service information.
     Airworthiness Limitations (AWL) Task 53-41-109,
Longitudinal Str. 6 splice at STR 6 and 20, of Appendix B,
Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2, Airworthiness Requirements,
Revision 9, dated June 10, 2013, of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19
Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053. This service information
describes procedures for inspecting the longitudinal stringer 6 splice
at stringers 6 and 20.
     AWL Task 53-41-110, Longitudinal Str. 6 splice butt strap
at Str. 6, FS409.0 to FS617.0, of Appendix B, Airworthiness
Limitations, of Part 2, Airworthiness Requirements, Revision 9, dated
June 10, 2013, of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements
Manual, CSP A-053. This service information describes procedures for
inspecting the longitudinal stringer 6 splice butt at stringer 6 at
fuselage station 409.0 to fuselage station 617.0.
     AWL Task 53-41-204, Frame splice angles at STR 6 and 20,
of Appendix B, Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2, Airworthiness
Requirements, Revision 9, dated June 10, 2013, of the Bombardier CL-
600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053. This service
information describes procedures for inspecting the frame splice angles
at stringers 6 and 20.
     AWL Task 53-41-205, Longitudinal skin splice at STR 6 and
20, of Appendix B, Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2, Airworthiness
Requirements, Revision 9, dated June 10, 2013, of the Bombardier CL-
600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053. This service
information describes procedures for inspecting the longitudinal skin
splice at stringers 6 and 20.
    This service information is reasonably available; see ADDRESSES for
ways to access this service information.

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD affects 526 airplanes of U.S. registry.
    We also estimate that it would take about 1 work-hour per product
to comply with the basic requirements of this AD. We have received no
definitive data that would enable us to provide cost estimates for the
repairs and modifications specified in this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of
this AD on U.S. operators to be $44,710, or $85 per product.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
    2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979);
    3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska; and
    4. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2014-0653; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information.
The street address for the Docket Operations office (telephone 800-647-
5527) is in the ADDRESSES section.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):

2015-05-03 Bombardier, Inc.: Amendment 39-18113. Docket No. FAA-
2014-0653; Directorate Identifier 2014-NM-057-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This AD becomes effective April 21, 2015.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Bombardier, Inc. Model CL-600-2B19 (Regional
Jet Series 100 & 440) airplanes, certificated in any category,
serial numbers 7003 and subsequent.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Periodic
Inspections.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by reports of cracking on the skin panels
and skin splice joints and angles at certain stringers at various
locations between certain fuselage stations. We are issuing this AD
to detect and correct widespread fatigue damage, which could
adversely affect the structural integrity of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Revision of Maintenance or Inspection Program

    Within 60 days after the effective date of this AD: Revise the
maintenance or inspection program, as applicable, by incorporating
the airworthiness limitations (AWL) tasks specified in paragraphs
(g)(1) through (g)(4) of this AD. The initial compliance times for
the tasks start from the applicable threshold times specified in
Part 2 Airworthiness Requirements, Revision 9, dated June 10, 2013,
of Appendix B, Airworthiness Limitations, of Bombardier CL-600-2B19,
Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053; except that, for
airplanes that have accumulated more than 38,000 total flight cycles
as of the effective date of this AD, the initial compliance time for
the AWL tasks is before the accumulation of 2,000 flight cycles
after the effective date of this AD.
    (1) AWL Task 53-41-109, Longitudinal Str. 6 splice at STR 6 and
20, of Appendix B, Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2,
Airworthiness Requirements, Revision 9, dated June 10, 2013, of the
Bombardier CL-600-2B19, Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053.
    (2) AWL Task 53-41-110, Longitudinal Str. 6 splice butt strap at
Str. 6, FS409.0 to FS617.0, of Appendix B, Airworthiness
Limitations, of Part 2, Airworthiness Requirements, Revision 9,
dated June 10, 2013, of the Bombardier CL-600-2B19, Maintenance
Requirements Manual, CSP A-053.
    (3) AWL Task 53-41-204, Frame splice angles at STR 6 and 20, of
Appendix B, Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2, Airworthiness
Requirements, Revision 9, dated June 10, 2013, of the Bombardier CL-
600-2B19, Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053.
    (4) AWL Task 53-41-205, Longitudinal skin splice at STR 6 and
20., of Appendix B, Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2,
Airworthiness Requirements, Revision 9, dated June 10, 2013, of the
Bombardier CL-600-2B19, Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053.

(h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals

    After the maintenance or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative actions (e.g.,
inspections) or intervals may be used unless the actions or
intervals are approved as an alternative method of compliance (AMOC)
in accordance with the procedures specified in paragraph (j)(1) of
this AD.

(i) Repairs and Modifications

    Before the accumulation of 60,000 total flight cycles: Install
repairs and modifications to preclude widespread fatigue damage at
locations specified in the tasks identified in paragraphs (g)(1)
through (g)(4) of this AD, using a method approved by the Manager,
New York ACO, ANE-170, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA); or Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization
(DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-
authorized signature.

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO, ANE-170, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the ACO, send it to ATTN: Program
Manager, Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-
7300; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office. The AMOC approval letter must
specifically reference this AD.
    (2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain corrective actions from a manufacturer, the action must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO,
ANE-170, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or
Bombardier, Inc.'s TCCA Design Approval Organization (DAO). If
approved by the DAO, the approval must include the DAO-authorized
signature.

(k) Related Information

    Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information (MCAI)
Canadian Airworthiness Directive CF-2014-07, dated January 31, 2014,
for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on
the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-
2014-0653-0003.

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Appendix B, Airworthiness Limitations, of Part 2,
Airworthiness Requirements, Revision 9, dated June 10, 2013, of the
Bombardier CL-600-2B19 Maintenance Requirements Manual, CSP A-053:
    (A) Airworthiness Limitations (AWL) Task 53-41-109, Longitudinal
Str. 6 splice at STR 6 and 20;
    (B) AWL Task 53-41-110, Longitudinal Str. 6 splice butt strap at
Str. 6, FS409.0 to FS617.0;
    (C) AWL Task 53-41-204, Frame splice angles at STR 6 and 20; and
    (D) AWL Task 53-41-205, Longitudinal skin splice at STR 6 and
20.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Bombardier, Inc., 400 C[ocirc]te-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
Qu[eacute]bec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax 514-855-
7401; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet http://www.bombardier.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on March 2, 2015.
Jeffrey E. Duven,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2015-05717 Filed 3-16-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 128 (Tuesday, July 3, 2018)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31139-31140]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14320]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OLEM-2018-0392, FRL-9980-05-OLEM]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Requirements and Exemptions for Specific RCRA Wastes
(Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is planning to
submit the information collection request (ICR) Requirements and
Exemptions for Specific RCRA Wastes (Renewal) (EPA ICR No. 1597.12, OMB
Control No. 2050-0145) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA). Before doing so, the EPA is soliciting public comments on
specific aspects of the proposed information collection as described
below. This is a proposed extension of the ICR, which is currently
approved through October 31, 2018. An Agency may not conduct or sponsor
and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before September 4, 2018.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OLEM-2018-0392, online using www.regulations.gov (our preferred
method), by email to [email protected], or by mail to: EPA Docket
Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peggy Vyas, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460; telephone
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public

docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, WJC West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, the EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. The
EPA will consider the comments received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will then be submitted to OMB for
review and approval. At that time, the EPA will issue another Federal
Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR to OMB and the
opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
    Abstract: In 1995, EPA promulgated regulations at 40 CFR part 273
that govern the collection and management of widely-generated hazardous
wastes known as ``Universal Wastes''. Universal Wastes are generated in
a variety of non-industrial settings, and are present in non-hazardous
waste management systems. Examples of Universal Wastes include certain
batteries, pesticides, mercury-containing lamps and thermostats. The
part 273 regulations are designed to ensure facilities collect these
wastes and properly manage them in an appropriate hazardous waste
management system. EPA needs to collect notifications of Universal
Waste management to obtain general information on these handlers and to
facilitate enforcement of the part 273 regulations. EPA promulgated
labeling and marking requirements and accumulation time limits to
ensure that Universal Waste is being accumulated responsibly. EPA needs
to collect information on illegal Universal Waste shipments to enforce
compliance with applicable regulations. Finally, EPA requires tracking
of Universal Waste shipments to help ensure that Universal Waste is
being properly treated, recycled, or disposed.
    In 2001, EPA promulgated regulations in 40 CFR part 266 that
provide increased flexibility to facilities managing wastes commonly
known as ``Mixed Waste.'' Mixed Wastes are low-level mixed waste (LLMW)
and naturally occurring and/or accelerator-produced radioactive
material (NARM) containing hazardous waste. These wastes are also
regulated by the Atomic Energy Act. As long as specified eligibility
criteria and conditions are met, LLMW and NARM are exempt from the
definition of hazardous waste as defined in Part 261. Although these
wastes are exempt from RCRA manifest, transportation, and disposal
requirements, facilities must still comply with the manifest,
transportation, and disposal requirements under the NRC (or NRC-
Agreement State) regulations. Section 266.345(a) requires that
generators or treaters notify EPA or the Authorized State that they are
claiming the Transportation and Disposal Conditional Exemption prior to
the initial shipment of a waste to a LLRW disposal facility. This
exemption notice provides a tool for RCRA program regulatory agencies
to become aware of the generator's exemption claims. The information
contained in the notification package provides the RCRA program
regulatory agencies with a general understanding of the claimant. This
information also allows the agencies to document the generator's
exemption status and to plan inspections and review exemption-related
records.
    And finally, in 1992, EPA finalized management standards for used
oils destined for recycling. The Agency codified the used oil
management standards at 40 CFR part 279. The regulations at 40 CFR part
279 establish, among other things, streamlined procedures for
notification, testing, labeling, and recordkeeping. They also establish
a flexible self-implementing approach for tracking off-site shipments
that allow used oil handlers to use standard business practices (e.g.,
invoices, bill of lading). In addition, part 279 sets standards for the
prevention and cleanup of releases to the environment during storage
and transit. EPA believes these requirements will minimize potential
mismanagement of used oils, while not discouraging recycling. Used oil
transporters must comply with all applicable packaging, labeling, and
placarding requirements of 49 CFR parts 173, 178, and 179. In addition,
used oil transporters must report discharges of used oil according to
existing 49 CFR part 171 and 33 CFR part 153 requirements.
    Form numbers: None.
    Respondents/affected entities: Private Sector and State, Local, or
Tribal Governments.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 273),
required to obtain or retain a benefit (40 CFR parts 266 and 279).
    Estimated number of respondents: 134,230.
    Frequency of response: On occasion.
    Total estimated burden: 679,354 hours per year. Burden is defined
at 5 CFR 1320.03(b).
    Total estimated cost: $10,015,823 (per year), includes $1,873
annualized capital/startup costs and $10,013,950 operation &
maintenance costs.
    Changes in estimates: The burden hours are likely to stay
substantially the same.

    Dated: June 19, 2018.
Barnes Johnson,
Director, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery.
[FR Doc. 2018-14320 Filed 7-2-18; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: June 26, 2008 (Volume 73, Number 124)]
[Notices]
[Page 36313]
[DOCID:fr26jn08-38]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. EL08-70-000]

Canandaigua Power Partners, LLC, Complainant, v. New York
Independent System Operator, Inc. Respondent; Notice of Complaint

June 18, 2008.
    Take notice that on June 17, 2008, Canandaigua Power Partners, LLC
(CPP) filed this complaint pursuant to Rule 206 of the Commission's
Rules of Practice and Procedure and section 206 of the Federal Power
Act, 16 U.S.C. 824e, seeking an order requiring the New York
Independent System Operator, Inc. (NYISO) to interpret its Open Access
Transmission Tariff (Tariff) to create a Headroom account for certain
system protection facilities that are qualifying System Upgrade
Facilities under its Tariff. In the alternative, CPP ask that the
Commission find that the Tariff is unjust, unreasonable and unduly
burdensome and the NYISO must make a Tariff filing implementing changes
to Tariff Attachment S to properly calculate, credit and assess
Headroom to system protection facilities under the NYISO's cost
allocation process.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. The Respondent's
answer and all interventions, or protests must be filed on or before
the comment date. The Respondent's answer, motions to intervene, and
protests must be served on the Complainants.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of Respondent's
answer, protests and interventions in lieu of paper using the
``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file
electronically should submit an original and 14 copies of the protest
or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. Eastern Time on July 7, 2008.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
 [FR Doc. E8-14450 Filed 6-25-08; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P