[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 93 (Wednesday, May 14, 2014)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 27483-27487]
[FR Doc No: 2014-10789]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2013-0602; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-010-AD;
Amendment 39-17848; AD 2014-10-01]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Vulcanair S.p.A. Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We are superseding airworthiness directive (AD) 2008-24-11 for
Vulcanair S.p.A. Model P68 airplanes. This AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as cracking and/or corrosion of the wing spar. We are issuing
this AD to require actions to address the unsafe condition on these
products.

DATES: This AD is effective June 18, 2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in the AD as of June 18,
2014.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain other publications listed in this AD as of January
2, 2009 (73 FR 72314, November 28, 2008).

ADDRESSES: You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating it in Docket No. FAA-
2013-0602; or in person at Document Management Facility, U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC
20590.
    For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Vulcanair Airworthiness Office, Via G Pascoli, 7, 80026 Casoria, Italy;
phone: +39 081 59 18 135; fax: +39 081 59 18 172; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.vulcanair.com/page-view.php?pagename=Service Bulletins. You may review copies of the
referenced service information at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate,
901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2013-
0602; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The address for the Docket Office (phone: 800-647-
5527) is Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, Missouri
64106; telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    We issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to add an AD that would apply to Vulcanair S.p.A. Model P68
airplanes. That NPRM was published in the Federal Register on July 9,
2013 (78 FR 41005), and proposed to supersede AD 2008-24-11, Amendment
39-15751 (73 FR 72314, November 28, 2008).
    Since we issued AD 2008-24-11, Amendment 39-15751 (73 FR 72314,
November 28, 2008), Vulcanair S.p.A. developed modification kits to
repair certain lower spar caps. They also developed a maintenance
manual supplement with special inspections of the wing and stabilator
structures and new limitations for the wing structure.
    The FAA also realized that the Models AP68TP300 ``SPARTACUS'' and
AP68TP 600 ``VIATOR'' were inadvertently included in AD 2008-24-11.
    The European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Community, has issued AD
No.: 2010-0051, dated March 25, 2010 (referred to after this as ``the
MCAI''), to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
MCAI states:

    Safe Life Limits of the wing structure of P.68 Series aeroplanes
have now been extended up to a maximum of 23 900 Flight Hours (FH),
depending on the condition of the spar lower cap angles and on the
embodiment of some modification kits. Furthermore, special
inspections of the wing and stabilator structures, different from
those previously required by EASA AD 2007-0027, have also been
introduced. This change has been developed by Vulcanair under change
No. MOD. P68/144 approved by EASA with approval No. 10028661on 02
February 2010.
    Consequently this AD, which supersedes EASA AD 2007-0027, allows
the implementation of the extended Safe Life Limits, in accordance
with the instructions of Vulcanair SB 162, and requires the
accomplishment of special inspections for the wing and stabilator
structures, in accordance with the Aircraft Maintenance Manual (AMM)
Supplement part number (P/N) NOR 10.771-52.

The MCAI can be found in the AD docket on the Internet at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0602-0002. EASA AD No.:
2010-0051, dated March 25, 2010; Vulcanair S.p.A. Maintenance Manual
Supplement NOR10.771-52, dated March 1, 2010; Vulcanair S.p.A. Service
Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010; Vulcanair S.p.A. Service
Instruction No. 88, dated March 1, 2010; and Vulcanair S.p.A. Service
Instruction No. 89, dated March 1, 2010, base the extended safe life
limits on repetitive inspections and other required preventive and
corrective actions that under certain conditions allow flight with
known cracks in critical structure. The FAA's Small Airplane
Directorate does not allow further flight with known cracks in critical
structure without additional substantiating data. Advisory Circular
(AC) 23-13A, Chapter 6, dated September 29, 2005, describes what
additional data is required to allow flight with known cracks (found on
the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf).

Comments

    We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We have considered the comment received. James Staley supports
the NPRM (78 FR 41005, July 9, 2013).

Conclusion

    We reviewed the relevant data, considered the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require adopting
the AD as proposed except for minor editorial changes. We have
determined that these minor changes:
     Are consistent with the intent that was proposed in the
NPRM (78 FR 41005, July 9, 2013) for correcting the unsafe condition;
and
     Do not add any additional burden upon the public than was
already proposed in the NPRM (78 FR 41005, July 9, 2013).

Costs of Compliance

    We estimate that this AD will affect 67 products of U.S. registry.
We also estimate that it will take about 60 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of this AD. The average labor rate
is $85 per work-hour.
    Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $341,700, or $5,100 per product.
    We estimate that the wing replacement will take about 300 work-
hours and require parts costing $443,406, for a cost of $468,906 per
product. Wing replacement is only required when the wing structure
exceeds the safe life established in this AD.
    In addition, we estimate that any necessary follow-on actions for
kit installation would take about 120 work-hours and require parts
costing $2,595, for a cost of $12,795 per product. We have no way of
determining the number of products that may need these actions, but it
would affect no more than 10 airplanes. Therefore the highest fleet
cost for these actions would be $127,950.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Introduction and Purpose of This Analysis

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (Pub. L. 96-354) (RFA)
establishes ``as a principle of regulatory issuance that agencies shall
endeavor, consistent with the objectives of the rule and of applicable
statutes, to fit regulatory and informational requirements to the scale
of the businesses, organizations, and governmental jurisdictions
subject to regulation. To achieve this principle, agencies are required
to solicit and

consider flexible regulatory proposals and to explain the rationale for
their actions to assure that such proposals are given serious
consideration.'' The RFA covers a wide-range of small entities,
including small businesses, not-for-profit organizations, and small
governmental jurisdictions.
    Agencies must perform a review to determine whether a rule will
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. If the agency determines that it will, the agency must
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis as described in the RFA.

Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)

    Section 604 of the Act requires agencies to prepare a final
regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) describing the impact of final
rules on small entities.
    Section 604(a) of the Act specifies the content of an FRFA.
    Each FRFA must contain:
    1. A statement of the need for, and objectives of, the rule;
    2. A statement of the significant issues raised by the public
comments in response to the initial regulatory flexibility analysis, a
statement of the assessment of the agency of such issues, and a
statement of any changes made in the proposed rule as a result of such
comments;
    3. The response of the agency to any comments filed by the Chief
Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration in response
to the proposed rule, and a detailed statement of any change made to
the proposed rule in the final rule as a result of the comments;
    4. A description of and an estimate of the number of small entities
to which the rule will apply or an explanation of why no such estimate
is available;
    5. A description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping and
other compliance requirements of the rule, including an estimate of the
classes of small entities which will be subject to the requirement and
the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the report
or record; and
    6. A description of the steps the agency has taken to minimize the
significant economic impact on small entities consistent with the
stated objectives of applicable statutes, including a statement of the
factual, policy, and legal reasons for selecting the alternative
adopted in the final rule and why each one of the other significant
alternatives to the rule considered by the agency which affect the
impact on small entities was rejected.

1. Need for and Objective of This Final Rule

    This AD results from MCAI originated by EASA and will supersede AD
2008-24-11, Amendment 39-15751 (73 FR 72314, November 28, 2008). AD
2008-24-11 established safe limits for the wing structure of Vulcanair
P.68 series airplanes and requires repetitive inspection and repair of
the wing and stabilator structures when the airplanes reach safe
limits. Operation beyond existing conservative safe limits (with
inspections and repair) is allowed pending establishment of final safe
limits and a terminating action.
    This AD significantly increases wing structure life limits (in a
few cases requiring kit modification of the wing structure) but
establishes a terminating action requiring replacement of the wing
structure and wing fuselage attachments and bolts when new established
safe limits are reached. Prior to the wing structure safe life limit
being reached, this AD also requires special inspections of the wing
structure with time limits, since new, of 6,000, 12,000, and 18,000
flight hours. After the first special inspection subsequent inspections
must be every 6000 flight hours thereafter.

2. Response to Public Comments

    There were no public comments on the initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA).

3. Response to Comments by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration

    There were no comments made by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy.

4. A Description of and an Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to
Which the Final Rule Will Apply

    This AD will affect 67 U.S.-registered airplanes, of which 40 are
owned by corporations, 8 by individuals, 2 by the Federal Government,
and 17 by state governments.
    Of the 48 airplanes owned by private entities, one trustee owns 3
airplanes, one trustee owns 2 airplanes, and two companies each own two
airplanes. The remaining 39 airplanes are owned by 39 corporations and
individuals. The FAA believes that all, or nearly all, of these private
sector owners are privately held small firms, for which we cannot
obtain financial records. We conclude that the AD will affect a
substantial number of small entities.

5. Reporting, Record Keeping, and Other Compliance Requirements of the
Final Rule

    Small entities will incur no new reporting and record-keeping
requirements as a result of this AD.
    The additional requirements of this AD compared to AD 2008-24-11,
Amendment 39-15751 (73 FR 72314, November 28, 2008) are the special
wing structure inspections at 6,000, 12,000, and 18,000 flight hours;
the terminating action to replace the wing structure when the wing
structure safe limit is reached; and, for airplanes with serial numbers
1 through 256 for which a spar crack was found under previous Vulcanair
SB65, replacement of the four main spar lower cap angles using
Vulcanair Kit SB162. The costs of the required actions provided in this
AD are as follows:

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                Cost of
                   Requirement                      Work-hours      Labor cost       materials      Total cost
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special inspections.............................              60          $5,100  ..............  ..............
Wing structure replacement......................             300          25,500         443,406         468,906
Replacement of lower spar cap angles with kit                120          10,200           2,595          12,795
 SB162 (S/N 1-256)..............................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost per hour is $85. The cost of crack repair is not provided in this AD.

    The requirement to replace the wing structure, at considerable
cost, occurs when the airplanes are old and have low value, often less
than the cost of wing structure replacement. Therefore, in many cases
airplane retirement is the least cost alternative, in which case the
effective cost of the requirement is the loss in airplane value net of
salvage value. The requirement to replace the lower spar cap angles
applies to at most ten U.S.-registered airplanes and only if a front
spar crack was previously found under SB No. 65. The expected present
value cost of this requirement is

minimal. The requirement for special inspections at 6,000, 12,000, and
18,000 flight hours applies to all AD-affected airplanes.
Economic Impact on Small Entities
    Since we have no financial information of the privately held firms
that constitute most of the operators of the affected airplanes, we
assess the economic impact of this AD using airplane values. As the
Vulcanair P.68 airplanes are not listed in the Aircraft Bluebook Price
Digest, we undertook an internet search and found that the resale value
of older P.68 airplanes, manufactured between 1975 and 1984 ranged from
about $80,000 to $300,000. Many of these airplanes will be subject to
the special inspection at 6,000 flight hours or even the special
inspection at 12,000 flight hours. Using a significant economic impact
criterion of 2 percent of airplane value, for operators of many of
these airplanes there is a significant economic impact based on just
one $5,100 inspection. Taking into account the present value cost of 2
to 3 possible future inspections and possible repair, as well as the
present value cost of forced early retirement, there is a significant
economic impact on most if not all of these operators.
    We therefore conclude that this AD will have a significant impact
on a substantial number of small firms.

6. Steps the Agency Has Taken To Minimize the Significant Economic
Impact on Small Entities

    Because of an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop
on the airplanes identified in this AD, there is no feasible
significant alternative to requiring the actions of this AD. Therefore,
there are no steps that the Agency can take to minimize the significant
economic impact on small entities.
    Therefore, this AD will have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.

Regulatory Findings

    We determined that this AD will not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979),
    (3) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (4) Will have a significant economic impact on a substantial number
of small entities under the criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a summary of the costs to comply with this AD (and
other information as included in the Regulatory Evaluation) and placed
it in the AD Docket, which may be found on the Internet at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=FAA-2013-0602; or in person at the
Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13  [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by removing Amendment 39-15751 (73 FR
72314; November 28, 2008), and adding the following new AD:

2014-10-01 Vulcanair S.p.A.: Amendment 39-17848; Docket No. FAA-
2013-0602; Directorate Identifier 2012-CE-010-AD.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) becomes effective June 18,
2014

(b) Affected ADs

    This AD supersedes AD 2008-24-11, Amendment 39-15751 (73 FR
72314; November 28, 2008).

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to Vulcanair S.p.A. Models P 68, P 68B, P 68C, P
68C-TC, P 68 ``OBSERVER,'' P68TC ``OBSERVER,'' and P68 ``OBSERVER
2'' airplanes, serial numbers (S/N) 01 through 429, S/Ns 431 through
452, and S/N 454, certificated in any category.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association of America (ATA) Code 57: Wings.

(e) Reason

    This AD was prompted by mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) originated by an aviation authority of another
country to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe condition as cracking and/or
corrosion of the wing spar. We are issuing this AD to detect and
correct cracking and corrosion of the wing spars, which, if not
corrected, could result in structural failure of the wing.

(f) Actions and Compliance

    Unless already done, do the following actions specified in
paragraphs (f)(1) through (f)(8) of this AD, to include all
subparagraphs.
    (1) Within 10 days after June 18, 2014] (the effective date of
this AD), incorporate Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Maintenance
Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52, 1st Issue, dated March 1, 2010, into
the FAA-approved maintenance program (maintenance manual) following
Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory Service Bulletin No.
162, dated March 1, 2010.
    (2) Within 10 days after June 18, 2014 (the effective date of
this AD), determine the safe life limit of the wing structure as
follows:
    (i) For all rows except rows (c) and (e) in table 1, of
paragraph 1.3, of Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory
Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010, use the safe life
limit specified in the appropriate row of the table; and
    (ii) For rows (c) and (e) in table 1, of paragraph 1.3, of
Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory Service Bulletin No.
162, dated March 1, 2010, before further flight, you must modify the
wing structure following Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory
Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010. After modification,
use the safe life limit specified in the appropriate row of the
table.
    (3) Before reaching the life limit as determined in paragraph
(f)(2) of this AD, before further flight, you must replace the wing
structure and wing fuselage attachments and bolts with new ones. Do
the replacement following Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants,
Maintenance Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52, 1st Issue, dated March
1, 2010, as specified in the instructions in WORK PROCEDURE,
paragraph 2 of Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory Service
Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010.
    (4) Do an initial inspection of the wing structure as specified
in the instructions in paragraph 2.1 of Vulcanair Aircraft, P68
Variants, Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010,
at the applicable times as specified in paragraphs (f)(4)(i) and
(f)(4)(ii). Repetitively thereafter inspect and replace the wing
structure following the limitations in Vulcanair Aircraft, P68
Variants, Maintenance Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52, 1st Issue,
dated March 1, 2010.
    (i) For aircraft that have not exceeded the safe life limit
hours time-in-service (TIS) on the wing structure as determined in
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD: Before

accumulating 6,000 hours TIS on the wing structure or within 100
hours TIS after June 18, 2014 (the effective date of this AD),
whichever occurs later, follow Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants,
Maintenance Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52, 1st Issue, dated March
1, 2010. You may take ``unless already done'' credit for this
inspection if inspected in compliance with AD 2008-24-11, Amendment
39-15751 (73 FR 72314; November 28, 2008); or
    (ii) For aircraft that have exceeded the safe life limit hours
TIS on the wing structure as determined in paragraph (f)(2) of this
AD: Within 100 hours TIS after June 18, 2014 (the effective date of
this AD), follow Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory Service
Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010.
    (5) Before accumulating 8,500 hours TIS since new on the
stabilator, within 500 hours TIS after January 2, 2009 (the
effective date of AD 2008-24-11, Amendment 39-15751 (73 FR 72314;
November 28, 2008)), or within 500 hours TIS from the last
inspection done in compliance with AD 2008-24-11, whichever occurs
later, do the initial inspection of the stabilator following
paragraph 2.2 of Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Maintenance
Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52, 1st Issue, dated March 1, 2010, or
Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory Service Bulletin No.
120, Revision 1, dated June 7, 2006. Repetitively thereafter inspect
the stabilator following the limitations in Vulcanair Aircraft, P68
Variants, Maintenance Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52, 1st Issue,
dated March 1, 2010.
    (6) If any cracks are found during the inspections required in
paragraphs (f)(4) and/or (f)(5) of this AD, before further flight,
modify the wing structure following Vulcanair Aircraft, P68
Variants, Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010.
    (7) For certain Model P 68 airplanes, AD 2009-24-03, Amendment
39-16090 (74 FR 62211, November 27, 2009) requires repetitive
inspections of the front and rear wing spars for cracks and
modification if cracks are found. The modification terminates the
repetitive inspections required in AD 2009-24-03 and may be done
regardless if cracks are found. The actions of AD 2009-24-03 are
independent of this AD action and remain in effect.
    (8) EASA AD No.: 2010-0051, dated March 25, 2010; Vulcanair
Aircraft, P68 Variants, Maintenance Manual Supplement NOR10.771-52,
1st Issue, dated March 1, 2010; Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants,
Mandatory Service Bulletin No. 162, dated March 1, 2010; Vulcanair
S.p.A. Service Instruction No. 88, dated March 1, 2010; and
Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Instruction No. 89, dated March 1, 2010,
base the required preventive and corrective actions on allowing
flight with known cracks in critical structure. The FAA's Small
Airplane Directorate does not allow further flight with known cracks
in critical structure without additional substantiating data.
Advisory Circular (AC) 23-13A, Chapter 6, dated September 29, 2005,
describes what additional data is required to allow flight with
known cracks (found on the Internet at http://rgl.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf).

(g) Other FAA AD Provisions

    The following provisions also apply to this AD:
    (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
Standards Office, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. Send
information to ATTN: Mike Kiesov, Aerospace Safety Engineer, FAA,
Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City, Missouri 64106;
telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane
to which the AMOC applies, notify your appropriate principal
inspector (PI) in the FAA Flight Standards District Office (FSDO),
or lacking a PI, your local FSDO.
    (2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.

(h) Related Information

    Refer to MCAI European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No.
2010-0051, dated March 25, 2010, for related information. You may
examine the MCAI in the AD docket on the Internet at: http://www.regulations.gov/#!documentDetail;D=FAA-2013-0602-0002. You may
also review Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Instruction No. 88, dated March
1, 2010; and Vulcanair S.p.A. Service Instruction No. 89, dated
March 1, 2010, for related information, which may be found using the
information found in paragraph (i).

(i) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
June 18, 2014 (the effective date of this AD).
    (i) Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory Service Bulletin
No. 162, dated March 1, 2010.
    (ii) Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Maintenance Manual
Supplement NOR10.771-52, 1st Issue, dated March 1, 2010.
    (4) The following service information was approved for IBR on
January 2, 2009.
    (i) Vulcanair Aircraft, P68 Variants, Mandatory Service Bulletin
No. 120, Revision 1, dated June 7, 2006.
    (ii) Reserved.
    (5) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Vulcanair Airworthiness Office, Via G Pascoli, 7, 80026 Casoria,
Italy; phone: +39 081 59 18 135; fax: +39 081 59 18 172; email:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet: http://www.vulcanair.com/page-view.php?pagename=Service Bulletins.
    (6) You may review copies of the referenced service information
at the FAA, Small Airplane Directorate, 901 Locust, Kansas City,
Missouri 64106. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (7) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on April 30, 2014.
Earl Lawrence,
Manager, Small Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2014-10789 Filed 5-13-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 93 (Wednesday, May 13, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 28650]
[FR Doc No: 2020-10174]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency

[Internal Agency Docket No. FEMA-4497-DR; Docket ID FEMA-2020-0001]

Kentucky; Amendment No. 1 to Notice of a Major Disaster
Declaration

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice amends the notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky (FEMA-4497-DR), dated March 28, 2020,
and related determinations.

DATES: This amendment was issued May 4, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dean Webster, Office of Response and
Recovery, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The notice of a major disaster declaration
for the Commonwealth of Kentucky is hereby amended to include
Individual Assistance limited to the Crisis Counseling Program for
those areas determined to have been adversely affected by the event
declared a major disaster by the President in his declaration of March
28, 2020.

    Individual Assistance limited to the Crisis Counseling Program
for all areas in the Commonwealth of Kentucky (already designated
for emergency protective measures [Category B] not authorized under
other Federal statutes, including direct Federal assistance).
    The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers
(CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030,
Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund; 97.032, Crisis
Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services; 97.034, Disaster
Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance
Grant; 97.048, Disaster Housing Assistance to Individuals and
Households In Presidentially Declared Disaster Areas; 97.049,
Presidentially Declared Disaster Assistance--Disaster Housing
Operations for Individuals and Households; 97.050 Presidentially
Declared Disaster Assistance to Individuals and Households--Other
Needs; 97.036, Disaster Grants--Public Assistance (Presidentially
Declared Disasters); 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant.

Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-10174 Filed 5-12-20; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9111-23-P


[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 74 (Tuesday, April 18, 2023)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 23593]
[FR Doc No: 2023-08132]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 71

[Docket No. FAA-2022-1347; Airspace Docket No. 22-ASO-25]
RIN 2120-AA66

Withdrawal of NPRM, Morganton, NC

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is withdrawing the notice of proposed rulemaking
published in the Federal Register on November 7, 2022, proposing to
amend Class E airspace in Morganton, NC, because it is duplicative of a
previous action.

DATES: The FAA is withdrawing the proposed rule published November 7,
2022 (87 FR 66974) as of April 18, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John Fornito, Operations Support
Group, Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation Administration, 1701
Columbia Avenue, College Park, GA 30337; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Reason for Withdrawal

    The FAA is withdrawing the NPRM for Docket No, FAA-2022-1347 (87 FR
66974; November 7, 2022) amending Class E airspace for Foothills
Regional Airport, Morganton, NC, because it is duplicative of a
previously published action. The FAA published a separate NPRM in the
Federal Register on October 28, 2022 (87 FR 65178), proposing to amend
the same airspace.

Conclusion

    The FAA determined that the NPRM published on November 7, 2022, is
duplicative and unnecessary. Therefore, the FAA withdraws that NPRM.

    Issued in College Park, Georgia, on April 12, 2023.
Andreese C. Davis,
Manager, Airspace & Procedures Team South, Eastern Service Center, Air
Traffic Organization.
[FR Doc. 2023-08132 Filed 4-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 3, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26546-26551]
[FR Doc No: 2016-10393]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9946-03-OECA]

Proposed Information Collection Request; Comment Request

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency is planning to submit the
below listed information collection requests (ICR) (See item specific
ICR title, EPA ICR Number and OMB Control Number provided in the text)
to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Before doing so, EPA is soliciting public comments on specific aspects
of the proposed information collection as described below. These are
proposed extensions of the currently approved ICRs. An Agency may not
conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a
collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.

DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before July 5, 2016.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing the Docket ID numbers
provided for each item in the text, online using www.regulations.gov
(our preferred method), by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail Code 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes profanity, threats, information
claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick Yellin, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supporting documents which explain in detail
the information that the EPA will be collecting are available in the
public docket for this ICR. The docket can be viewed online at
www.regulations.gov or in person at the EPA Docket Center, EPA West,
Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW., Washington, DC. The telephone
number for the Docket Center is<PHONE_NUMBER>. For additional
information about EPA's public docket, visit http://www.epa.gov/dockets.
    Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, EPA is soliciting
comments and information to enable it to: (i) Evaluate whether the
proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the Agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility; (ii) evaluate the accuracy of
the Agency's estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (iii) enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (iv) minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate automated electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. Burden
is defined at 5 CFR 1320.03(b). EPA will consider the comments received
and amend the ICR as appropriate. The final ICR package will then be
submitted to OMB for review and approval. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice to announce the submission of the ICR
to OMB and the opportunity to submit additional comments to OMB.
    General Abstract: For all the listed ICRs in this notice, owners
and operators of affected facilities are required to comply with
reporting and record keeping requirements for the general provisions of
40 CFR part 60, subpart A or Part 63, Subpart A, as well as the
applicable specific standards. This includes submitting initial
notifications, performance tests and periodic reports and results, and
maintaining records of the occurrence and duration of any startup,
shutdown, or malfunction in the operation of an affected facility, or
any period during which the monitoring system is inoperative. These
reports are used by EPA to determine compliance with the standards.

    (1) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0336; Title: NESHAP for Off-
Site Waste and Recovery Operations (40 CFR part 63, subpart DD); EPA
ICR Number 1717.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0313; Expiration Date:
October 31, 2016.
    Respondents: Waste management and recovery facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart DD).
    Estimated number of respondents: 236 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 179,000 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $17,500,000, includes $5,810 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance (O&M) costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (2) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2012-0679; Title: NESHAP for
Petroleum Refineries: Catalytic Cracking Units, Reforming and Sulfur
Units (40 CFR part 63, subpart UUU); EPA ICR Number 1844.07, OMB
Control Number 2060-0554; Expiration Date: October 31, 2016.
    Respondents: Petroleum refineries with catalytic cracking units,
catalytic reforming units and/or sulfur recovery units.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart UUU).
    Estimated number of respondents: 123 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 10,200 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $9,400,000, includes $8,400,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an expected increase in burden hours
due to expected modification of existing facilities.

    (3) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0338; Title: NESHAP for the
Manufacture of Amino/Phenolic Resins (40 CFR part 63, subpart OOO); EPA
ICR Number 1869.08, OMB Control Number 2060-0434; Expiration Date:
October 31, 2016.
    Respondents: Facilities that manufacture amino/phenolic resins.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart OOO).
    Estimated number of respondents: 37 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 22,400 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $2,200,000, includes $14,800 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (4) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0341; Title: NESHAP for
Plywood and Composite Products (40 CFR parts 63, Subpart DDDD); EPA ICR
Number 1984.06, OMB Control Number 2060-0552; Expiration Date: October
31, 2016.
    Respondents: Plywood and composite wood products (PCWP) facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart DDDD).
    Estimated number of respondents: 228 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 11,700 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $1,160,000, includes $16,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (5) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0318; Title: NSPS for
Magnetic Tape Coating Facilities (40 CFR part 60, subpart SSS); EPA ICR
Number 1135.12, OMB Control Number 2060-0171; Expiration Date: November
30, 2016.
    Respondents: Magnetic tape coating facilities constructed or
modified after January 22, 1986.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart SSS).
    Estimated number of respondents: 6 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 2,020 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $283,000, includes $86,400 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (6) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0334; Title: NSPS for
Secondary Brass and Bronze Production, Primary Copper Smelters, Primary
Zinc Smelters, Primary Lead Smelters, Primary Aluminum Reduction
Plants, and Ferroalloy Production Facilities (40 CFR part 60, subparts
M, P, Q, R, S, Z); EPA ICR Number 1604.11, OMB Control Number 2060-
0110; Expiration Date: November 30, 2016.
    Respondents: Secondary brass or bronze production facilities;
primary

copper, primary zinc, and primary lead facilities; primary aluminum
reduction facilities; and ferroalloy production facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subparts M, P, Q, R, S, and Z).
    Estimated number of respondents: 19 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, semiannually, and
annually.
    Estimated annual burden: 4,960 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $612,000 includes $127,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (7) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0339; Title: NESHAP for Boat
Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart VVVV); EPA ICR Number 1966.06,
OMB Control Number 2060-0546; Expiration Date: November 30, 2016.
    Respondents: Boat manufacturing facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart VVVV);
    Estimated number of respondents: 144 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 23,500 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $2,300,000, includes $800 annualized capital
or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (8) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0345; Title: NESHAP for
Metal Can Manufacturing Surface Coating (40 CFR part 63, subpart KKKK);
EPA ICR Number 2079.06, OMB Control Number 2060-0541; Expiration Date:
November 30, 2016.
    Respondents: Metal can manufacturing facilities that use 1,500
gallons or more of surface coatings.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart KKKK).
    Estimated number of respondents: 5 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 1,940 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $196,000, includes $6,000 annualized capital
or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (9) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0313; Title: NSPS for
Stationary Gas Turbines (40 CFR part 60, subpart GG); EPA ICR Number
1071.12, OMB Control Number 2060-0028; Expiration Date: December 31,
2016.
    Respondents: Stationary gas turbines.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart GG).
    Estimated number of respondents: 535 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 68,400 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $6,700,000, includes $0 annualized capital
or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (10) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0333; Title: Standards of
Performance for Air Emission Standards for Tanks, Surface Impoundments
and Containers (40 CFR part 264, subpart CC and 40 CFR part 265,
subpart CC); EPA ICR Number 1593.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0318;
Expiration Date: December 31, 2016.
    Respondents: Facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous
wastes in tanks, surface impoundments, and containers.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 264,
subpart CC and 40 CFR part 265, subpart CC).
    Estimated number of respondents: 6,200 (total).
    Frequency of response: Occasionally.
    Estimated annual burden: 712,000 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $82,100,000, includes $12,400,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (11) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0335; Title: NESHAP for
Aerospace Manufacturing and Rework Facilities (40 CFR part 63, subpart
GG); EPA ICR Number 1687.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0314; Expiration
Date: December 31, 2016.
    Respondents: Aerospace manufacturing and rework facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart GG).
    Estimated number of respondents: 136 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 141,000 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $13,900,000, includes $136,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (12) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0340; Title: NESHAP for
Stationary Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engines (40 CFR part 63,
subpart ZZZZ); EPA ICR Number 1975.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0548;
Expiration Date: December 31, 2016.
    Respondents: Stationary reciprocating internal combustion engines.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart ZZZZ).
    Estimated number of respondents: 903,000 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, semiannually, and
annually.
    Estimated annual burden: 3,430,000 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $425,000,000, includes $27,900,000
annualized capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an expected increase in burden hours
due to an increase in the respondent universe.

    (13) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0346; Title: NESHAP for
Acrylic/Modacrylic Fibers Prod., Carbon Black Prod., Chemical Mfg:
Chromium Compounds, Flexible Polyurethane Foam Production/Fabrication,
Lead Acid Battery Mfg, Wood Preserving (40 CFR part 63, subparts
LLLLLL, MMMMMM, NNNNNN, OOOOOO, PPPPPP, and QQQQQQ); EPA ICR Number
2256.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0598; Expiration Date: December 31,
2016.
    Respondents: Acrylic or modacrylic fibers production plants, carbon
black production plants, chemical manufacturing that use chromite ore
as the basic feedstock, flexible polyurethane foam manufacturing or
fabrication facilities, lead acid battery manufacturing facilities, and
wood preserving facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subparts LLLLLL, MMMMMM, NNNNNN, OOOOOO, PPPPPP, and QQQQQQ).
    Estimated number of respondents: 956 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 3,220 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $315,000, includes $0 annualized capital or
O&M costs.

    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (14) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0301; Title: NESHAP for
Beryllium (40 CFR part 61, subpart C); EPA ICR Number 0193.12, OMB
Control Number 2060-0092; Expiration Date: January 31, 2017.
    Respondents: Facilities processing beryllium and its derivatives.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 61,
subpart C).
    Estimated number of respondents: 33 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and monthly.
    Estimated annual burden: 2,630 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $292,000, includes $35,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (15) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0310; Title: NSPS for
Sewage Sludge Treatment Plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart O); EPA ICR
Number 1063.13, OMB Control Number 2060-0035; Expiration Date: January
31, 2017.
    Respondents: Sewage sludge treatment plants.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart O).
    Estimated number of respondents: 112 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 12,500.
    Estimated annual cost: $5,180,000, includes $3,960,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an increase in burden due to
expected construction of new facilities or modifications of existing
facilities.

    (16) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0314; Title: NSPS for
Phosphate Rock Plants (40 CFR part 60, subpart NN); EPA ICR Number
1078.11, OMB Control Number 2060-0111; Expiration Date: January 31,
2017.
    Respondents: Phosphate rock facilities that commenced construction
or reconstruction after September 21, 1979.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart NN).
    Estimated number of respondents: 14 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 1,720 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $302,000, includes $133,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an expected increase in burden due
to an increase in the number of new or modified sources.

    (17) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0329; Title: NSPS for
Rubber Tire Manufacturing (40 CFR part 60, subpart BBB); EPA ICR Number
1158.12, OMB Control Number 2060-0156; Expiration Date: January 31,
2017.
    Respondents: Rubber tire manufacturing plants that commenced
construction or modification after January 20, 1983.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart BBB).
    Estimated number of respondents: 41 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, semiannually, and
annually.
    Estimated annual burden: 17,700 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $1,750,000, includes $16,400 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (18) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0331; Title: NSPS for New
Residential Wood Heaters (40 CFR part 60, subpart AAA); EPA ICR Number
1176.12, OMB Control Number 2060-0161; Expiration Date: January 31,
2017.
    Respondents: Manufacturers, retailers, and certification
laboratories of new residential wood heaters.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart AAA).
    Estimated number of respondents: 947 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially and occasionally.
    Estimated annual burden: 11,700 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $2,890,000, includes $1,740,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (19) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0342; Title: NESHAP for
Lime Manufacturing (40 CFR part 63, subpart AAAAA); EPA ICR Number
2072.06, OMB Control Number 2060-0544; Expiration Date: January 31,
2017.
    Respondents: Lime manufacturing plants.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart AAAAA).
    Estimated number of respondents: 65 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 15,400 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $1,820,000, includes $312,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an increase in burden hours from the
previous ICR due to an expected increase in the number of respondents.

    (20) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0302; Title: NSPS for
Graphic Arts Industry (40 CFR part 60, subpart QQ); EPA ICR Number
0657.12, OMB Control Number 2060-0105; Expiration Date: February 28,
2017.
    Respondents: Graphics arts facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart QQ).
    Estimated number of respondents: 20 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 1,800 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $176,000, includes $0 annualized capital or
O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an increase in burden hours from the
previous ICR due to an expected increase in respondent universe.

    (21) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0325; Title: NESHAP for
Benzene Emission from Benzene Storage Vessels and Coke-By-Product
Recovery Plants (40 CFR part 61, subparts L and Y); EPA ICR Number
1080.15, OMB Control Number 2060-0185; Expiration Date: March 31, 2017.
    Respondents: Owners or operators of benzene storage vessels and
coke by-product recovery plants.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 61,
subparts L and Y).
    Estimated number of respondents: 21 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, semiannually, and
annually.
    Estimated annual burden: 3,190 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $312,000, includes $0 annualized capital or
O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (22) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0319; Title: NSPS for VOC
Emissions from Petroleum Refinery Wastewater Systems (40 CFR part 60,
subpart QQQ); EPA ICR Number

1136.12, OMB Control Number 2060-0172; Expiration Date: March 31, 2017.
    Respondents: Petroleum refineries with wastewater systems.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart QQQ).
    Estimated number of respondents: 135 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 9,240 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $922,000, includes $17,600 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (23) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0353; Title: NSPS for
Stationary Spark Ignition Internal Combustion Engines (40 CFR part 60,
subpart JJJJ); EPA ICR Number 2227.05, OMB Control Number 2060-0610;
Expiration Date: March 31, 2017.
    Respondents: Stationary spark ignition internal combustion engines.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart JJJJ).
    Estimated number of respondents: 17,600 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially and annually.
    Estimated annual burden: 23,300 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $4,640,000, includes $2,360,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an expected increase in burden hours
from the previous ICR due to growth in the respondent universe.

    (24) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0321; Title: NSPS for
Sewage Sludge Incinerators (40 CFR part 60, subpart LLLL); EPA ICR
Number 2369.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0658; Expiration Date: March
31, 2017.
    Respondents: New or modified sewage sludge incinerators.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart LLLL).
    Estimated number of respondents: 4 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and annually.
    Estimated annual burden: 798 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $448,000, includes $370,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an expected increase in burden hours
from the previous ICR due to growth in the respondent universe.

    (25) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0317; Title: NESHAP for
Gold Mine Ore Processing (40 CFR part 63, subpart EEEEEEE); EPA ICR
Number 2383.04, OMB Control Number 2060-0659; Expiration Date: March
31, 2017.
    Respondents: Gold mine ore processing and production facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart EEEEEEE).
    Estimated number of respondents: 21 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, semiannually, and
annually.
    Estimated annual burden: 2,360 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $445,000, includes $227,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (26) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2016-0009; Title: NESHAP for
Group IV Polymers and Resins (40 CFR part 63, subpart JJJ); EPA ICR
Number 2457.03, OMB Control Number 2060-0682; Expiration Date: March
31, 2017.
    Respondents: Thermoplastic resin production facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart JJJ).
    Estimated number of respondents: 31 (total).
    Frequency of response: Semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 459 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $1,110,000, includes $542,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.

    (27) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2014-0063; Title: NESHAP for
Polyether Polyols Production (40 CFR part 63, subpart PPP); EPA ICR
Number 1811.10, OMB Control Number 2060-0415; Expiration Date: May 31,
2017.
    Respondents: Polyether polyols production facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 63,
subpart PPP).
    Estimated number of respondents: 23 (total).
    Frequency of response: Occasionally and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 3,700 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $433,000, includes $226,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (28) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0303; Title: NSPS for
Equipment Leaks of VOC in Petroleum Refineries (40 CFR part 60,
subparts GGG and GGGa); EPA ICR Number 0983.15, OMB Control Number
2060-0067; Expiration Date: June 30, 2017.
    Respondents: Petroleum refineries.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subparts GGG and GGGa).
    Estimated number of respondents: 130 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 24,900 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $2,430,000, includes $0 annualized capital
or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    (29) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0350; Title: The
Consolidated Air Rule (CAR) for the Synthetic Organic Chemical
Manufacturing Industry (SOCMI); EPA ICR Number 1854.10, OMB Control
Number 2060-0443; Expiration Date: June 30, 2017.
    Respondents: Synthetic organic chemical manufacturing facilities.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 65).
    Estimated number of respondents: 4,620 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, semiannually and
annually.
    Estimated annual burden: 2,130,000 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $309,000,000, includes $101,000,000
annualized capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an expected increase in burden hours
from the previous ICR due to growth in the respondent universe.

    (30) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0315; Title: NSPS for
Commercial and Industrial Solid Waste Incineration (CISWI) Units (40
CFR part 60, subpart CCCC); EPA ICR Number 2384.04, OMB Control Number
2060-0662; Expiration Date: June 30, 2017.
    Respondents: Commercial and industrial solid waste incineration
units.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart CCCC).
    Estimated number of respondents: 4 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, semiannually, and
annually.
    Estimated annual burden: 1,040 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $451,000, includes $350,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an expected increase in burden hours
from the previous ICR due to growth in the respondent universe.

    (31) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2014-0034; Title: NSPS for Kraft
Pulp Mills (40 CFR part 60, subpart BB); EPA ICR Number 2485.03, OMB
Control Number 2060-0690; Expiration Date: June 30, 2017.
    Respondents: Kraft pulp mills.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subpart BB).
    Estimated number of respondents: 4 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 1,910 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $753,000, includes $567,000 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is an expected increase in burden hours
from the previous ICR due to growth in the respondent universe.

    (32) Docket ID Number: EPA-HQ-OECA-2013-0316; Title: NSPS for
Onshore Natural Gas Processing Plants (40 CFR part 60, subparts KKK and
LLL); EPA ICR Number 1086.12, OMB Control Number 2060-0120; Expiration
Date: August 31, 2017.
    Respondents: Onshore natural gas processing plants.
    Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR part 60,
subparts KKK and LLL).
    Estimated number of respondents: 577 (total).
    Frequency of response: Initially, occasionally, and semiannually.
    Estimated annual burden: 122,000 hours.
    Estimated annual cost: $12,000,000, includes $68,400 annualized
capital or O&M costs.
    Changes in Estimates: There is no change in burden hours from the
previous ICR.

    Dated: April 18, 2016.
Edward J. Messina,
Director, Monitoring, Assistance and Media Programs Division.
[FR Doc. 2016-10393 Filed 5-2-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 245 (Monday, December 21, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 83071]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28088]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:

    Docket Numbers: EC21-34-000.
    Applicants: Kings Point Wind, LLC, The Empire District Electric
Company.
    Description: Application for Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Kings Point Wind, LLC, et. al.
    Filed Date: 12/14/20.
    Accession Number: 20201214-5219.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:

    Docket Numbers: EG21-54-000.
    Applicants: PGR Lessee O, LLC.
    Description: Self-Certification of exempt Wholesale Generator of
PGR Lessee O, LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/14/20.
    Accession Number: 20201214-5161.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:

    Docket Numbers: ER10-2302-009.
    Applicants: Public Service Company of New Mexico.
    Description: Compliance filing: PNM Compliance Filing with November
13, 2020 Order to be effective 11/13/2020.
    Filed Date: 12/14/20.
    Accession Number: 20201214-5185.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER19-2674-002.
    Applicants: New Mexico PPA Corporation.
    Description: Compliance filing: MBR Filing in Compliance with
November 13, 2020 Order to be effective 11/13/2020.
    Filed Date: 12/14/20.
    Accession Number: 20201214-5172.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-860-003.
    Applicants: Green River Wind Farm Phase 1, LLC.
    Description: Compliance filing: Reactive Power Compliance Filing to
be effective 3/22/2020.
    Filed Date: 12/15/20.
    Accession Number: 20201215-5087.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER20-1890-003.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Compliance filing: 2020-12-15 Intertie Deviation
Settlement--Compliance Filing to be effective 1/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/15/20.
    Accession Number: 20201215-5102.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-244-001.
    Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Errata to Correct Location--DEC RS
No. 318 Amendment 2021 to be effective 1/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/14/20.
    Accession Number: 20201214-5169.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/21/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-645-000.
    Applicants: TransWest Express LLC.
    Description: Application for authorization to sell transmission
service rights at negotiated rates, request for approval of capacity
allocation process, and request for waivers of TransWest Express LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/11/20.
    Accession Number: 20201211-5208.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/4/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-647-000.
    Applicants: Arizona Public Service Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Rate Schedule No. 265,
Amendment No. 3_PV--Morgan Joint Participation to be effective 2/15/
2021.
    Filed Date: 12/15/20.
    Accession Number: 20201215-5083.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-648-000.
    Applicants: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Revisions to Bylaws and
Membership Agreement Regarding Partial Terminations to be effective 3/
1/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/15/20.
    Accession Number: 20201215-5099.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-649-000.
    Applicants: California Independent System Operator Corporation.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: 2020-12-15 Rate Schedule No.
50 COI-POA to be effective 1/1/2021.
    Filed Date: 12/15/20.
    Accession Number: 20201215-5103.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-650-000.
    Applicants: Rail Splitter Wind Farm II LLC.
    Description: Request for Prospective One-Time, Limited Waiver of
Tariff Provisions, et al. of Rail Splitter Wind Farm II LLC.
    Filed Date: 12/14/20.
    Accession Number: 20201214-5241.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 12/24/21.

    Docket Numbers: ER21-651-000.
    Applicants: The Connecticut Light and Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Eastern CT Resource Recovery
Authority Small Generator Interconnection Agreement to be effective 12/
15/2020.
    Filed Date: 12/15/20.
    Accession Number: 20201215-5139.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 1/5/21.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying
the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: December 15, 2020.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-28088 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register: February 2, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 20)]
[Notices]
[Page 5874]
[DOCID:fr02fe09-84]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-59300; File No. SR-CBOE-2008-117]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Exchange
Rule 4.21 Relating to Third Party Deposits

January 27, 2009.

I. Introduction

    On December 2, 2008, the Chicago Board Options Exchange,
Incorporated (``CBOE'' or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4
thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend Exchange Rule 4.21
relating to third party deposits. The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal Register on December 23, 2008.\3\
The Commission received no comments on the proposal. This order
approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59104 (December 15,
2008), 73 FR 78862 (the ``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    Under current CBOE Rule 4.21, member organizations engaged in the
business of clearing and carrying the accounts of options market makers
(``Clearing Firms'') are prohibited (with certain exceptions) from
accepting a check or funds transfer if the name on the account from
which the funds are drawn is different (i.e., is from a ``third
party'') from the name on the account cleared or carried by the
Clearing Firm.
    CBOE proposes to amend the rule to permit Clearing Firms to accept
for deposit to a broker-dealer account checks and funds transfers that:
(i) Constitute an award or settlement paid as the result of the
resolution of litigation or arbitration which arose in connection with
the broker-dealer's securities or futures business; (ii) are drawn on
an account of the government of the United States; or (iii) are drawn
on the account of another broker-dealer for satisfaction of the
resolution of transaction disputes.\4\ The Exchange also proposes to
clarify that documents evidencing that a deposit qualifies for
acceptance under Rule 4.21, as well as documents authorizing transfers
between two accounts under Rule 4.21, must be retained by the Clearing
Firm. The Exchange believes that the proposed exceptions do not present
any of the concerns or business risks to the Clearing Firm that the
rule was originally intended to address.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The Exchange also notes that Clearing Firms, as a matter of
business judgment, may still refuse to accept checks and/or funds
transfers from third parties. See id. at 78863.
    \5\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\6\
In particular, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ which requires that an exchange
have rules designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission notes
that it has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that permitting Clearing Firms to accept
for deposit these specific types of checks and fund transfers should
streamline inter-member dealings without exposing Clearing Firms to the
types of risks that the rule was designed to mitigate. Further, the
proposed amendments to Interpretation and Policy .06 to Rule 4.21 are
designed to ensure that Clearing Firms retain supporting documentation
to evidence compliance with the rule. Accordingly, the Commission finds
the proposed amendments to Rule 4.21 to be consistent with the Act.

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the
Act,\8\ that the proposed rule change (SR-CBOE-2008-117) be, and hereby
is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-2160 Filed 1-30-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P