[Federal Register: February 26, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 37)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 8717-8719]
[DOCID:fr26fe09-6]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2008-0150; Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-325-AD;
Amendment 39-15818; AD 2009-04-12]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 767-200, -300, and -400ER
Series Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding an existing airworthiness directive
(AD),

which applies to certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes. That AD
currently requires a one-time inspection for missing, damaged, or
incorrectly installed parts in the separation link assembly on the
deployment bar of the emergency escape system on the entry or service
door, and installation of new parts if necessary. This new AD requires
replacing the separation link assembly on the applicable entry and
service doors with an improved separation link assembly, and doing
related investigative and corrective actions if necessary; and
inspecting for discrepancies of the unloaded spring dimensions in the
separation link assembly, and doing corrective actions if necessary.
This AD also removes certain airplanes from the applicability. This AD
results from reports that entry and service doors did not open fully
during deployment of emergency escape slides, and additional reports of
missing snap rings. We are issuing this AD to prevent failure of an
entry or service door to open fully in the event of an emergency
evacuation, which could impede exit from the airplane. This condition
could result in injury to passengers or crewmembers.

DATES: This AD becomes effective April 2, 2009.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of certain publications listed in the AD as of April 2, 2009.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124-
2207; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation,
any comments received, and other information. The address for the
Docket Office (telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>) is the Document Management
Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30,
West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Keith Ladderud, Aerospace Engineer,
Cabin Safety and Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle
Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057-3356; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Discussion

    The FAA issued a supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
to amend 14 CFR part 39 to include an AD that supersedes AD 2001-26-19,
amendment 39-12585 (67 FR 265, January 3, 2002). The existing AD
applies to certain Boeing Model 767 series airplanes. That supplemental
NPRM was published in the Federal Register on September 23, 2008 (73 FR
54747). That supplemental NPRM proposed to require replacing the
separation link assembly on the applicable entry and service doors with
an improved separation link assembly, and doing related investigative
and corrective actions if necessary; and inspecting for discrepancies
of the unloaded spring dimensions in the separation link assembly, and
doing corrective actions if necessary. That supplemental NPRM also
proposed to remove certain airplanes from the applicability.

Comments

    We provided the public the opportunity to participate in the
development of this AD. No comments have been received on the
supplemental NPRM or on the determination of the cost to the public.

Conclusion

    We have carefully reviewed the available data and determined that
air safety and the public interest require adopting the AD as proposed
in the supplemental NPRM.

Costs of Compliance

    There are about 1,225 airplanes of the affected design in the
worldwide fleet. This AD affects about 355 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The new actions take up to about 6 work hours per airplane, at an
average labor rate of $80 per work hour. Required parts cost up to
about $10,671 per airplane. Based on these figures, the estimated cost
of the new actions specified in this AD for U.S. operators is
$3,958,605, or $11,151 per airplane.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866;
    (2) Is not a ``significant rule'' under DOT Regulatory Policies and
Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
    We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this AD and placed it in the AD docket. See the ADDRESSES
section for a location to examine the regulatory evaluation.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

Adoption of the Amendment

0
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) amends Sec.  39.13 by
removing amendment 39-12585 (67 FR 265, January 3, 2002) and by adding
the following new airworthiness directive (AD):

2009-04-12 Boeing: Amendment 39-15818. Docket No. FAA-2008-0150;
Directorate Identifier 2007-NM-325-AD.

Effective Date

    (a) This AD becomes effective April 2, 2009.

Affected ADs

    (b) This AD supersedes AD 2001-26-19.

Applicability

    (c) This AD applies to Boeing Model 767-200, -300, and -400ER
series airplanes, certificated in any category, as identified in
Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-25-0428, dated August
23, 2007.

Unsafe Condition

    (d) This AD results from reports that entry and service doors
did not open fully during deployment of emergency escape slides, and
additional reports of missing snap rings. We are issuing this AD to
prevent failure of an entry or service door to open fully in the
event of an emergency evacuation, which could impede exit from the
airplane. This condition could result in injury to passengers or
crewmembers.

Compliance

    (e) You are responsible for having the actions required by this
AD performed within the compliance times specified, unless the
actions have already been done.

Replacement

    (f) Within 48 months after the effective date of this AD,
replace the separation link assembly on the deployment bar of the
emergency escape system on all the applicable entry and service
doors with an improved separation link assembly, and do all the
applicable related investigative and corrective actions before
further flight, by accomplishing all of the applicable actions
specified in the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Special
Attention Service Bulletin 767-25-0428, dated August 23, 2007; or
Revision 1, dated May 8, 2008. After the effective date of this AD
only Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-25-0428, Revision
1, may be used.

Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (g)(1) The Manager, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office (ACO),
FAA, ATTN: Keith Ladderud, Aerospace Engineer, Cabin Safety and
Environmental Systems Branch, ANM-150S, FAA, Seattle ACO, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425) 917-
6435; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; has the authority to approve AMOCs for
this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
    (2) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Before using any approved AMOC on any airplane to which the AMOC
applies, notify your appropriate principal inspector (PI) in the FAA
Flight Standards District Office (FSDO), or lacking a PI, your local
FSDO.

Material Incorporated by Reference

    (h) You must use Boeing Special Attention Service Bulletin 767-
25-0428, dated August 23, 2007; or Boeing Special Attention Service
Bulletin 767-25-0428, Revision 1, dated May 8, 2008; as applicable;
to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies
otherwise.
    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of this service information under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington
98124-2207; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax<PHONE_NUMBER>; e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (3) You may review copies of the service information that is
incorporated by reference at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
425-227-1221 or<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (4) You may also review copies of the service information at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information
on the availability of this material at NARA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>, or
go to: http://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.

    Issued in Renton, Washington, on January 22, 2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-3263 Filed 2-25-09; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


Telephone log

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Voicemail left by Steve Adams, UPACo Adhesives in Richmond VA

tel. 1-800-446-9984 x 113

He asked if there was a final ruling on nPB in adhesives yet, since in
2005, I had said we might have one by the end of 2006.

I returned the call and left a voicemail message, saying that a rule
package on nPB had just been released from interagency review this week,
and I was expecting publication in the Federal Register by the end of
the month.  I also said that we would post the rules on EPA’s web site
at   HYPERLINK "http://www.epa.gov/ozone/snap"  www.epa.gov/ozone/snap .

Mr. Adams later called back.  He said that he was going to be making a
presentation to the Polyurethane Foam Association in Baltimore on May 24
concerning new developments in adhesives for foam fabrication.  Mr.
Adams wanted an update on the nPB rule so that he could give the most
up-to-date information during his presentation.


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 194 (Monday, October 7, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 53555]
[FR Doc No: 2019-21854]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Notice of Opportunity for Public Comment To Change the Land Use
From Aeronautical to Non Aeronautical for 28.46 Acres at Waterville
LaFleur Airport, Waterville, ME

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Request for public comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is being given that the FAA is considering a request
from the City of Waterville, ME to change the land use from
Aeronautical to Non Aeronautical for 28.46 acres. The land use change
will allow the development of a solar farm on land that is not needed
for aeronautical purposes. The revenue generated by the lease of
airport land for the solar farm will be placed into the airport's
operation and maintenance fund.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 6, 2019.

ADDRESSES: You may send comments using any of the following methods:
     Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to http://www.regulations.gov, and follow the instructions on providing comments.
     Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
     Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W 12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
     Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
    Interested persons may inspect the request and supporting documents
by contacting the FAA at the address listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Jorge E. Panteli, Compliance and
Land Use Specialist, Federal Aviation Administration New England Region
Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, Massachusetts,
01803. Telephone:<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts on September 27, 2019.
Gail B. Lattrell,
Director, ANE-600.
[FR Doc. 2019-21854 Filed 10-4-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 96 (Wednesday, May 18, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Page 31283]
[FR Doc No: 2016-11640]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC
20549-2736

Extension: Schedule 14D-9F
    SEC File No. 270-339, OMB Control No. 3235-0382

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange
Commission (``Commission'') has submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget this request for extension of the previously approved
collection of information discussed below.
    Schedule 14D-9F (17 CFR 240.14d-103) under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78 et seq.) is used by any foreign private
issuer incorporated or organized under the laws of Canada or by any
director or officer of such issuer, where the issuer is the subject of
a cash tender or exchange offer for a class of securities filed on
Schedule 14D-1F. The information required to be filed with the
Commission is intended to permit verification of compliance with the
securities law requirements and assures the public availability of such
information. The information provided is mandatory and all information
is made available to the public upon request. We estimate that Schedule
14D-9F takes approximately 2 hours per response to prepare and is filed
by approximately 6 respondents annually for a total reporting burden of
12 hours (2 hours per response x 6 responses).
    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    The public may view the background documentation for this
information collection at the following Web site, www.reginfo.gov.
Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities and
Exchange Commission, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC 20503, or by sending an email to:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Pamela Dyson, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Remi
Pavlik-Simon, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 or send an email
to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB within 30
days of this notice.

    Dated: May 12, 2016.
Robert W. Errett,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2016-11640 Filed 5-17-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 31 (Thursday, February 14, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 4128-4129]
[FR Doc No: 2019-02316]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

[Docket No. PHMSA-2018-0109]

Pipeline Safety: Information Collection Activities, Gas and
Liquid Pipeline Safety Program Certification

AGENCY: Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA),
DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice announces that the information collection request abstracted
below is being forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review and comment. PHMSA proposes revising certain parts of both
the Natural Gas and Hazardous Liquid Base Grant Progress reports to
make the data collected consistent with the data collected through the
Pipeline Data Mart. A Federal Register notice with a

60-day comment period soliciting comments on the information collection
was published on November 26, 2018.

DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
March 18, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Angela Hill by telephone at 202-366-
1246, by email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail at DOT, PHMSA, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, PHP-30, Washington, DC 20590-0001.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding the burden estimate, including
suggestions for reducing the burden, to the Office of Management and
Budget, Attention: Desk Officer for the Office of the Secretary of
Transportation, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 1320.8(d), Title 5, Code of Federal
Regulations, requires PHMSA to provide interested members of the public
and affected agencies an opportunity to comment on information
collection and recordkeeping requests. In accordance with this
regulation, on November 26, 2018, (83 FR 60557) PHMSA published a
Federal Register notice with a 60-day comment period soliciting
comments on the information collection. In response, PHMSA received
comments from the Pipeline Safety Trust and Vectren Corporation. The
Pipeline Safety Trust requests that PHMSA add additional reporting
requirements to this information collection to improve PHMSA's
oversight of state grants and to fill agency-identified data gaps.
Vectren Corporation supports the information collection, but notes that
it could be improved by more detailed reporting instructions and more
specific, consistent definitions for data and reporting.
    The data obtained from this information collection reflects State
Program activities that measure program performance and how grant funds
are being used. Separate efforts are currently underway to address the
feasibility study of a Nationwide Integrated Pipeline Safety Regulatory
Database and all options are being considered to help with this
process. PHMSA also streamlined data fields in both the Natural Gas and
Hazardous Liquid Base Grant Progress Reports to make the forms easier
to read and follow.
    A summary of changes is below:
     Gas LNG operator categories listed together instead of
separately.
     Hazardous liquid operator categories renamed to be
consistent with Pipeline DataMart.
     Incident/Accident cause listing updated to match annual
reports and Pipeline DataMart.
     Updated maximum civil penalties to current DOT level.
    The burden for this information collected has also been updated to
account for a more accurate number of submissions received annually.
PHMSA previously expected to receive 116 responses to this information
collection request. PHMSA has since updated that estimate to 66
responses (51 gas programs and 15 hazardous liquid programs). The
estimated time burden for completing the annual submission is 58.5
hours. PHMSA will submit the information collection, as described
below, to OMB for approval.
    The following information is provided for this information
collection: (1) Title of the information collection; (2) OMB control
number; (3) Current expiration date; (4) Type of request; (5) Abstract
of the information collection activity; (6) Description of affected
public; (7) Estimate of total annual reporting and recordkeeping
burden; and (8) Frequency of collection.
    PHMSA will request a three-year term of approval for the following
information collection:
    Title: Gas Pipeline Safety Program Certification and Hazardous
Liquid Pipeline Safety Program Certification.
    OMB Control Number: 2137-0584.
    Current Expiration Date: 02/28/2019.
    Abstract: A state must submit an annual certification to assume
responsibility for regulating intrastate pipelines. Certain records
must be maintained to demonstrate that the state is ensuring
satisfactory compliance with the pipeline safety regulations. PHMSA
uses this information to evaluate a state's eligibility to receive
federal grants.
    Affected Public: State governments.
    Annual Reporting and Recordkeeping Burden:
    Total Annual Responses: 66.
    Total Annual Burden Hours: 3,861.
    Frequency of Collection: Annually.
    Comments to Office of Management and Budget are invited on:
    (a) The need for the proposed information, including whether the
information will have practical utility in helping the agency to
achieve its pipeline safety goals;
    (b) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection;
    (c) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
    (d) Ways to minimize the burden on those who are to respond,
including the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection techniques.

    Authority:  The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995; 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35, as amended; and 49 CFR 1.48.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on February 11, 2019, under authority
delegated in 49 CFR 1.97.
John A. Gale,
Director, Standards and Rulemaking Division.
[FR Doc. 2019-02316 Filed 2-13-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 4910-60-P


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 220 (Wednesday, November 14, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67850-67851]
[FR Doc No: 2012-27599]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-68176; File No. SR-C2-2012-037]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change
To Amend the Fees Schedule

November 7, 2012.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 31, 2012, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (the
``Exchange'' or ``C2'') filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments
on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend its Fees Schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site (http://www.c2exchange.com/Legal/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary,
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    Currently, orders for a joint back office (``JBO'') account that
clear through the Firm range at the Options Clearing Corporation
(``OCC'') (these are the only type of JBO orders that are sent into the
Exchange) are sent into the Exchange using the same origin code as Firm
orders, and are therefore assessed the same fees as Firm orders.
Beginning on November 1, 2012, the Exchange is making available a new
origin code for such JBO orders.\3\ As such, the Exchange proposes to
list JBO as a potential origin for orders on the C2 Fees Schedule in
the same categories as the listings for Firm fees. JBO orders will
still be assessed the same fee amounts as previously (the same amounts
as Firm orders). No substantive changes to any fee amounts are being
made.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See C2 Regulatory Circular C2RG12-047 (October 5, 2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed change is to take effect on November 1, 2012.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\4\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is
consistent with the Section 6(b)(5)5 requirements that the rules of an
exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade,
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts, to remove impediments to
and to perfect the mechanism for a free and open market and a national
market

system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Adding JBO as a potential origin for orders to the appropriate sections
on the Fees Schedule will ensure that market participants entering
orders for a JBO account to be cleared into the Firm range at the OCC
will easily be able to discern the fees that apply to such orders. This
will eliminate any potential confusion, thereby removing a potential
impediment to and perfecting the mechanism for a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in general, protecting investors and
the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    C2 does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any
burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) \6\ of the Act and paragraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \7\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \7\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-C2-2012-037 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2012-037. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does
not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-C2-2012-037 and should be
submitted on or before December 5, 2012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\8\
Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2012-27599 Filed 11-13-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGION 8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1595 Wynkoop Street
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Denver, CO   80202-1129
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phone<PHONE_NUMBER>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
www.epa.gov/region8

Ref: 8ARD-PM

Mr. Mike Natchees
Director, Air Quality Program
Energy and Minerals Department
Ute Indian Tribe
P.O. Box 70
Fort Duchesne, Utah  84026

Dear Mr. Natchees:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 8 is proposing to issue a synthetic minor permit for the KGH Operating Company (KGH), Bonanza State 20-15H Compressor Station on the Uintah and Ouray Indian Reservation. As requested by KGH, this permit authorizes the construction and operation of new emission sources, specifically a 1.0 million standard cubic foot per day triethylene glycol (TEG) dehydration unit. The TEG dehydration unit would be constructed inside an existing building within the existing footprint of the facility. The permit also authorizes the removal of one of the permitted compressor engines currently operating at 20-15H and the removal of an unpermitted jet pump engine. This permit also maintains previously established enforceable emissions restrictions for existing installed and operating emissions units and associated voluntarily installed and operated control devices.

A public comment period for the proposed permit will begin on July 16, 2020, and end on August 17, 2020.

The proposed permit and supporting documentation are available in the electronic docket at Regulations.gov (Docket ID #EPA-R08-OAR-2020-0192), and we ask that you please assist members of the public who contact you with instructions on how to access the material available for public review until the end of the public comment period. Comments may be submitted by mail, via email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or through regulations.gov (Docket ID #EPA-R08-OAR-2020-0192). All of these documents will also be available for review in electronic format on our website at: https://www.epa.gov/caa-permitting/caa-permit public-comment-opportunities-region-8.

If you have any questions concerning the proposed permit or technical support documents, please contact Colin Schwartz, of my staff, at<PHONE_NUMBER>.

                                       Sincerely,

	  						Monica Morales
                                    Acting Director
							Air and Radiation Division

Enclosures


[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 4 (Thursday, January 7, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1004-1005]
[FR Doc No: X10-330107]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: US Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of Investor Education and Advocacy, Washington, DC
20549-0213.

Extension: Rule 17i-6, SEC File No. 270-532, OMB Control No. 3235-
0588.

    Notice is hereby given that pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 \1\ the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') has
submitted to the Office of Management and Budget request for extension
of the previously approved collection of information discussed below.
The Code of Federal Regulation citation to this collection of
information is the following rule: 17 CFR 240.17i-6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Section 231 of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 \2\ (the
``GLBA'') amended Section 17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (17
USC 78a et seq.) (the ``Exchange Act'') to create a regulatory
framework under which a holding company of a broker-dealer
(``investment bank holding company'' or

``IBHC'') may voluntarily be supervised by the Commission as a
supervised investment bank holding company (or ``SIBHC'').\3\ In 2004,
the Commission promulgated rules, including Rule 17i-6, to create a
framework for the Commission to supervise SIBHCs.\4\ This framework
includes qualification criteria for SIBHCs, as well as recordkeeping
and reporting requirements. Among other things, this regulatory
framework for SIBHCs is intended to provide a basis for non-U.S.
financial regulators to treat the Commission as the principal U.S.
consolidated home-country supervisor for SIBHCs and their affiliated
broker-dealers.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Public Law 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338 (1999).
    \3\ See 15 U.S.C. 78q(i).
    \4\ See Exchange Act Release No. 49831 (Jun. 8, 2004), 69 FR
34472 (Jun. 21, 2004).
    \5\ See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 106-434, 165 (1999). See also
Exchange Act Release No. 49831, at 6 (Jun. 8, 2004), 69 FR 34472, at
34473 (Jun. 21, 2004).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to Section 17(i)(3)(A) of the Exchange Act, an SIBHC must
make and keep records, furnish copies thereof, and make such reports as
the Commission may require by rule.\6\ Rule 17i-6 requires that an
SIBHC file with the Commission certain monthly and quarterly reports
and an annual audit report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(i)(3)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The collections of information required by Rule 17i-6 are necessary
to allow the Commission to adequately to supervise the activities of
these SIBHCs and to effectively determine whether supervision of an
IBHC as an SIBHC is necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of Section 17 of the Act. Rule 17i-6s also enhances the
Commission's supervision of a SIBHCs' subsidiary broker-dealers through
collection of additional information and inspections of affiliates of
those broker-dealers. Without these reports, the Commission would be
unable to adequately supervise an SIBHC, nor would it be able to
determine whether continued supervision of an IBHC as an SIBHC were
necessary and appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of Section 17
of the Act.
    We estimate that three IBHCs will file Notices of Intention with
the Commission to be supervised by the Commission as SIBHCs. An SIBHC
will require about 8 hours to prepare and file each monthly report
required by this rule (or approximately 64 hours per year).\7\ On
average, it will take an SIBHC about 16 hours each quarter (or 64 hours
each year) \8\ to prepare and file the quarterly reports required by
this rule. An SIBHC will require about 200 hours to prepare and file
the annual audit reports required by this rule. Consequently, the total
annual burden of Rule 17i-6 on all SIBHCs is approximately 984
hours.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ The SIBHC must file with the Commission a monthly report
within 30 calendar days after the end of each month that does not
coincide with a fiscal quarter end. Consequently, the SIBHC must
file a monthly report 8 times each year. (8 hours x 8 months) = 64
hours/year.
    \8\ (16 hours x 4 quarters in a year) = 64 hours/year.
    \9\ (64 hours per year to prepare and file monthly reports + 64
hours each year to prepare and file quarterly reports + 200 hours
each year to prepare and file annual audit reports) x 3 SIBHCs = 984
hours.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 17i-6 requires that an SIBHC file certain monthly and
quarterly reports with the Commission, as well as an annual audit
report. The average cost for an SIBHC to prepare and file the monthly
reports is about $1,424 per month, and thus approximately $11,392 per
year.\10\ On average, an SIBHC will incur a quarterly cost of $2,848 to
prepare and file the required quarterly reports, and thus will incur an
annual cost of $11,392 to file these reports.\11\ Finally, an SIBHC, on
average, will incur an annual cost of $40,400 to prepare and file an
annual audit.\12\ Thus, the total dollar cost of the ongoing paperwork
burden associated with Rule 17i-6 is approximately $189,552 \13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ We believe that an SIBHC would have a Senior Accountant
prepare and file these reports. According to the Securities Industry
Financial Management Association (or ``SIFMA''), the hourly cost of
a Senior Accountant is $178, as reflected in the SIFMA's Report on
Management and Professional Earnings for 2008, and modified to
account for an 1,800-hour work-year and multiplied by 5.35 to
account for bonuses, firm size, employee benefits and overhead.
($178 x 8 hours) = $1,424. ($1,424 x 8 months) = $11,392.
    \11\ We believe that an SIBHC would have a Senior Accountant
prepare and file these reports. The hourly cost of a Senior
Accountant is $178. ($178 x 16 hours) = $2,842. ($2,848 x 4
quarters) = $11,392.
    \12\ We believe that an SIBHC would have a Senior Internal
Auditor work with accountants to prepare and file these reports.
According to the SIFMA, the hourly cost of a Senior Internal Auditor
is $202, as reflected in its Report on Management and Professional
Earnings for 2008, and modified to account for an 1,800-hour work-
year and multiplied by 5.35 to account for bonuses, firm size,
employee benefits and overhead. ($202 x 200 hours) = $40,400.
    \13\ (($11,392 +$11,392 + $40,400) x 3 SIBHCs) = $189,552.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We believe that an IBHC likely will upgrade its information
technology (``IT'') systems in order to more efficiently comply with
certain of the SIBHC framework rules (including Rules 17i-4, 17i-5,
17i-6 and 17i-7), and that this would be a one-time cost. Depending on
the state of development of the IBHC's IT systems, it would cost an
IBHC between $1 million and $10 million to upgrade its IT systems to
comply with the SIBHC framework of rules. Thus, on average, it would
cost each of the three IBHCs about $5.5 million to upgrade their IT
systems, or approximately $16.5 million in total. It is impossible to
determine what percentage of the IT systems costs would be attributable
to each Rule, so we allocated the total estimated upgrade costs equally
(at 25% for each of the above-mentioned Rules), with $4,125,000
attributable to Rule 17i-6.
    The reports and notices required to be filed pursuant to Rule 17i-6
must be preserved for a period of not less than three years.\14\ The
collection of information is mandatory and the information required to
be provided to the Commission pursuant to this Rule is deemed
confidential pursuant to Section 17(j) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 \15\ and Section 552(b)(3)(B) of the Freedom of Information
Act,\16\ notwithstanding any other provision of law. In addition,
paragraph 17i-6(h) specifies that all reports and statements filed by
an SIBHC in accordance with Rule 17i-6 shall be accorded confidential
treatment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 240.17i-5(b)(3).
    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78q(j)
    \16\ 5 U.S.C. 552(b)(3)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid control number.
    Comments should be directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the Securities
and Exchange Commission Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget, Room 10102, New Executive Office
Building, Washington, DC, 20503 or by sending an e-mail to: Shagufta_
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and (ii) Charles Boucher, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Shirley
Martinson, 6432 General Green Way, Alexandria, Virginia 22312 or send
an e-mail to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Comments must be submitted to OMB
within 30 days of this notice.

    Dated: December 30, 2009.
Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-5 Filed 1-6-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P