[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 89 (Monday, May 9, 2022)]
[Notices]
[Page 27669]
[FR Doc No: 2022-10029]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, May 12, 2022.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners,
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date,
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or his designee, has
certified that, in his opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10),
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202)
551-5400.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.)

    Dated: May 5, 2022.
Vanessa A. Countryman,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2022-10029 Filed 5-5-22; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register: January 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 13)]
[Notices]
[Page 3455-3456]
[DOCID:fr21ja10-32]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 459-295]

Union Electric Company dba Ameren/UE; Notice of Application for
Amendment of License and Soliciting Comments, Motions To Intervene, and
Protests

January 13, 2010.
    Take notice that the following hydroelectric application has been
filed with the Commission and is available for public inspection:
    a. Application Type: Non-project use of project lands and waters.
    b. Project No: 459-295.
    c. Date Filed: November 24, 2009.
    d. Applicant: Union Electric Company dba Ameren/UE.
    e. Name of Project: Osage Hydroelectric Project.
    f. Location: The project is located in Benton, Camden, Miller, and
Morgan Counties, Missouri. The proposed action would be located at the
Ozark Yacht Club near mile marker 0.8+0.6 in Jennings Branch Cove on
the Lake of the Ozarks, in Camden County, Missouri.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. 791a--825r.
    h. Applicant Contact: Mr. Jeff Green, Shoreline Supervisor, Ameren/
UE, P.O. Box 993, Lake Ozark, MO 65049,<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    i. FERC Contact: Any questions on this notice should be addressed
to

Christopher Yeakel at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or e-mail address:
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>    j. Deadline for filing comments, motions to intervene, and protest:
February 16, 2010.
    All documents (original and eight copies) should be filed with:
Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426. Please include the project number (P-459-295) on
any comments or motions filed.
    The Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure require all
interveners filing documents with the Commission to serve a copy of
that document on each person whose name appears on the official service
list for the project. Further, if an intervener files comments or
documents with the Commission relating to the merits of an issue that
may affect the responsibilities of a particular resource agency, they
must also serve a copy of the document on that resource agency. A copy
of any motion to intervene must also be served upon each representative
of the Applicant specified in the particular application.
    k. Description of Request: The licensee requests approval to permit
Ozark Yacht Club to construct a new 4-slip boat dock and modify the
existing fuel dock. The existing fuel dock would be modified by the
addition of one boat slip, which would increase the total length of the
dock by 26 feet. The docks would be available for use by patrons of the
Ozark Yacht Club.
    l. Locations of the Application: A copy of the application is
available for inspection and reproduction at the Commission's Public
Reference Room, located at 888 First Street, NE., Room 2A, Washington,
DC 20426, or by calling<PHONE_NUMBER>. This filing may also be viewed
on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov using the
``eLibrary'' link. Enter the docket number excluding the last three
digits in the docket number field to access the document. You may also
register online at http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/esubscription.asp to
be notified via e-mail of new filings and issuances related to this or
other pending projects. For assistance, call 1-866-208-3372 or e-mail
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>for TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. A copy is
also available for inspection and reproduction at the address in item
(h) above.
    m. Individuals desiring to be included on the Commission's mailing
list should so indicate by writing to the Secretary of the Commission.
    n. Comments, Protests, or Motions To Intervene: Anyone may submit
comments, a protest, or a motion to intervene in accordance with the
requirements of Rules of Practice and Procedure, 18 CFR 385.210, .211,
.214. In determining the appropriate action to take, the Commission
will consider all protests or other comments filed, but only those who
file a motion to intervene in accordance with the Commission's Rules
may become a party to the proceeding. Any comments, protests, or
motions to intervene must be received on or before the specified
comment date for the particular application.
    o. Any filings must bear in all capital letters the title
``COMMENTS'', ``PROTEST'', or ``MOTION TO INTERVENE'', as applicable,
and the Project Number of the particular application to which the
filing refers.
    p. Agency Comments: Federal, state, and local agencies are invited
to file comments on the described application. A copy of the
application may be obtained by agencies directly from the Applicant. If
an agency does not file comments within the time specified for filing
comments, it will be presumed to have no comments. One copy of an
agency's comments must also be sent to the Applicant's representatives.
    q. Comments, protests and interventions may be filed electronically
via the Internet in lieu of paper. See, 18 CFR 385.2001(a)(1)(iii) and
the instructions on the Commission's Web site at http://www.ferc.gov
under the ``e-Filing'' link.

Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-1009 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 133 (Thursday, July 11, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Page 33065]
[FR Doc No: 2019-14736]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Docket No. ES19-33-000]

Northern Indiana Public Service Company; Notice of Filing

    Take notice that on July 3, 2019, Northern Indiana Public Service
Company filed an Errata to July 2, 2019 Supplement to its June 11, 2019
Application under section 204 of the Federal Power Act for
Authorization to Issue Securities.
    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date.
Anyone filing a motion to intervene or protest must serve a copy of
that document on the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the eFiling link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
eLibrary link and is available for review in the Commission's Public
Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an eSubscription link on the
website that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a
document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any
FERC Online service, please email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call
(866) 208-3676 (toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comments: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 10, 2019.

    Dated: July 5, 2019.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2019-14736 Filed 7-10-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 89 (Wednesday, May 8, 2019)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 20028]
[FR Doc No: 2019-09409]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2019-0268]

Safety Zone; Hemingway Sunset Run & Paddleboard Race, Key West,
FL

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of enforcement of regulation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce the temporary safety zone for the
Hemingway Sunset Run & Paddleboard Race, Key West, Florida on July 20,
2019. Our regulation for Recurring Safety Zones in Captain of the Port
Key West Zone identifies the regulated area for this event. This action
is necessary to ensure the safety of event participants and spectators.
During the enforcement period, no person or vessel may enter, transit
through, anchor in, or remain within the regulated area without
approval from the Captain of the Port Key West or a designated
representative.

DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR 165.786, Table to Sec.  165.786, Item
7.1 will be enforced from 5 p.m. until 6:30 p.m. on July 20, 2019.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
notice of enforcement, call or email Gregory Bergstrom, Sector Key West
Waterways Management Department, Coast Guard; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>;
email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast Guard will enforce the safety
zones in 33 CFR 165.786, for the Hemingway Sunset Run and Paddleboard
Race regulated area from 5 p.m. to 6:30 p.m. on July 20, 2019. This
action is being taken to provide for the safety of life on navigable
waterways during this event. Our regulation for recurring marine events
within Sector Key West, Table to Sec.  165.786, Item 7.1, specifices
the location of the regulated area. During the enforcement period, no
person or vessel may enter, transit through, anchor in, or remain
within the established regulated areas without approval from the
Captain of the Port Key West or designated representative. The Coast
Guard may be assisted by other Federal, State, or local law enforcement
agencies in enforcing this regulation.
    The Coast Guard will provide notice of the regulated area by Local
Notice to Mariners and Broadcast Notice to Mariners. If the Captain of
the Port Key West determines that the regulated area need not be
enforced for the full duration stated in this publication, he or she
may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant general permission to
enter the regulated area.

    Dated: May 1, 2019.
A.A. Chamie,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Key West.
[FR Doc. 2019-09409 Filed 5-7-19; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register: May 13, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 91)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 22490-22491]
[DOCID:fr13my09-17]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 271

[EPA-R06-RCRA-2008-0755; FRL-8900-9]

Texas: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The State of Texas has applied to EPA for final authorization
of the changes to its hazardous waste program under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). EPA proposes to grant final
authorization to the State of Texas. In the ``Rules and Regulations''
section of this Federal Register, EPA is authorizing the changes by an
immediate final rule. EPA did not make a proposal prior to the
immediate final rule because we believe this action is not
controversial and do not expect comments that oppose it. We have
explained the reasons for this authorization in the preamble to the
immediate final rule. Unless we get written comments which oppose this
authorization during the comment period, the immediate final rule will
become effective on the date it establishes, and we will not take
further action on this proposal. If we receive comments that oppose
this action, we will withdraw the immediate final rule and it will not
take effect. We will then respond to public comments in a later final
rule based on this proposal. You may not have another opportunity for
comment. If you want to comment on this action, you must do so at this
time.

DATES: Send your written comments by June 12, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Send written comments to Alima Patterson, Region 6, Regional
Authorization Coordinator, (6PD-O), Multimedia Planning and Permitting
Division, at the address shown below. You can examine copies of the
materials submitted by the State of Texas during normal business hours
at the following locations: EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733, phone number<PHONE_NUMBER>; Texas

Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), 12100 Park S. Circle,
Austin TX 78753-3087,<PHONE_NUMBER>. Comments may also be submitted
electronically or through hand delivery/courier; please follow the
detailed instructions in the ADDRESSES section of the immediate final
rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alima Patterson<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For additional information, please see the
immediate final rule published in the ``Rules and Regulations''section
of this Federal Register.

    Dated: April 22, 2009.
Lawrence E. Starfield,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 6.
[FR Doc. E9-11189 Filed 5-12-09; 8:45 am]


[Federal Register Volume 87, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 11, 2022)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1349-1352]
[FR Doc No: 2022-00038]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

14 CFR Part 39

[Docket No. FAA-2021-0571; Project Identifier AD-2021-00101-T;
Amendment 39-21835; AD 2021-24-14]
RIN 2120-AA64

Airworthiness Directives; The Boeing Company Airplanes

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain The Boeing Company Model 787-8, 787-9, and 787-10 airplanes.
This AD was prompted by reports of damage to the thrust reverser (TR)
translating sleeve secondary sliders due to contact between the slider
and the slider track liner. This damage could reduce the fatigue life
of the slider below its full design life for the TRs installed on
certain engines. This AD requires determining the serial number of the
TR and performing applicable on-condition actions; or replacing the TR
with a serviceable TR. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.

DATES: This AD is effective February 15, 2022.
    The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain publication listed in this AD as of February 15,
2022.

ADDRESSES: For service information identified in this final rule,
contact Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data
Services (C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA
90740-5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com. You may view this service information at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>. It is also available at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA-2021-0571.

Examining the AD Docket

    You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0571; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, any
comments received, and other information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue
SE, Washington, DC 20590.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tak Kobayashi, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email:
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14
CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain The Boeing
Company Model 787-8, 787-9, and 787-10 airplanes. The NPRM published in
the Federal Register on August 9, 2021 (86 FR 43443). The NPRM was
prompted by reports of damage to the TR translating sleeve secondary
sliders due to contact between the slider and the slider track liner.
This damage was found on TR sleeves installed only on certain engines.
In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require determining the serial number
of the TR and performing applicable on-condition actions; or replacing
the TR with a serviceable TR. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
this damage, which could result in failure of the TR translating sleeve
secondary slider and possible detachment of the outer cowl, which could
strike the fuselage, causing damage to the airplane, and could result

in reduced control or performance of the airplane.

Discussion of Final Airworthiness Directive

Comments

    The FAA received a comment from the Air Line Pilots Association,
International (ALPA), who supported the NPRM without change.
    The FAA received additional comments from one commenter, Boeing.
The following presents the comments received on the NPRM and the FAA's
response to each comment.

Request To Clarify Unsafe Condition

    The Background section of the NPRM and paragraph (e) of the
proposed AD stated that damage was found on TR sleeves installed only
on certain engines. Boeing requested that the FAA clarify the
description of the unsafe condition to state that this damage can
result in an unsafe condition on TR sleeves installed on certain
engines. Boeing added that, although this damage (gouging and grooving)
is possible on pre- and post-mission improvement TRs installed on
General Electric and Rolls-Royce engines, it was determined by the
Boeing safety process that the damage could result in an unsafe
condition only for the mission improvement TRs on Rolls-Royce engines.
    The FAA agrees with Boeing's assertions, but disagrees with the
proposed wording because it does not explain why the TRs installed on
certain other engines are not affected by this safety issue. To clarify
the description of the unsafe condition, the FAA has revised the
SUMMARY and paragraph (e) of this AD to indicate that damage to the TR
translating sleeve secondary sliders could reduce the fatigue life of
the slider below its full design life for the TRs installed on certain
engines.

Conclusion

    The FAA reviewed the relevant data, considered any comments
received, and determined that air safety requires adopting this AD as
proposed. Except for minor editorial changes, and any other changes
described previously, this AD is adopted as proposed in the NPRM. None
of the changes will increase the economic burden on any operator.

Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51

    The FAA reviewed Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin B787-81205-
SB780043-00 RB, Issue 001, dated January 15, 2021. This service
information specifies procedures for determining the serial number of
the TR, and applicable on-condition actions; or replacing the TR with a
serviceable TR. On-condition actions include reworking affected TR
slider track liners; determining the serial number of the TR
translating sleeves; checking to determine if certain TR translating
sleeves have been installed on certain TRs; performing a detailed
inspection of the secondary sliders of affected TR translating sleeves
for cracking, grooving, gouging damage, and any existing repair;
performing a dye penetrant inspection on any cracking, grooving or
gouging damage, and any existing repair for cracking; and repairing any
discrepancy found. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means identified in ADDRESSES.

Costs of Compliance

    The FAA estimates that this AD affects 14 airplanes of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with this AD:

                                      Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                        Cost per
             Action                  Labor cost        Parts cost        product        Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Serial number inspection.......  6 work-hours x $85              $0            $510  Up to $7,140.
                                  per hour = $510.
Replacement (per T/R half).....  12 work-hours x                  0           1,020  Up to $14,280.
                                  $85 per hour
                                  $1,020.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA estimates the following costs to do the following on-
condition actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:

                                     Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                Action                        Labor cost          Parts cost            Cost per product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Repair...............................  Up to 100 work-hours x               $0  Up to $8,500.
                                        $85 per hour = Up to
                                        $8,500.
Dye-penetrant inspection.............  Up to 4 work-hours x                  0  Up to $340.
                                        $85 per hour = Up to
                                        $340.
TR sleeve serial number check........  1 work-hour x $85 per                 0  $85.
                                        hour = $85.
Check to determine if TR translating   1 work-hour x $85 per                 0  $85.
 sleeve has been installed on certain   hour = $85.
 TRs.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the cost
estimates for the on-condition rework and detailed inspections
specified in this AD.
    The FAA has included all known costs in its cost estimate.
According to the manufacturer, however, some or all of the costs of
this AD may be covered under warranty, thereby reducing the cost impact
on affected operators.

Authority for This Rulemaking

    Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
    The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and

procedures the Administrator finds necessary for safety in air
commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that authority because
it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking action.

Regulatory Findings

    This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
    For the reasons discussed above, I certify that this AD:
    (1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
    (2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
    (3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39

    Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.

The Amendment

    Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:

PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.

Sec.  39.13   [Amended]

0
2. The FAA amends Sec.  39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:

2021-24-14 The Boeing Company: Amendment 39-21835; Docket No. FAA-
2021-0571; Project Identifier AD-2021-00101-T.

(a) Effective Date

    This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective February 15,
2022.

(b) Affected ADs

    None.

(c) Applicability

    This AD applies to The Boeing Company Model 787-8, 787-9, and
787-10 airplanes, certificated in any category, powered by Rolls-
Royce Trent 1000 engines.

(d) Subject

    Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 78, Thrust
Reverser.

(e) Unsafe Condition

    This AD was prompted by reports of damage to the thrust reverser
(TR) translating sleeve secondary sliders due to contact between the
slider and the slider track liner. This damage could reduce the
fatigue life of the slider below its full design life for the TRs
installed on certain engines. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
this damage, which could result in failure of the TR translating
sleeve secondary slider and possible detachment of the outer cowl,
which could strike the fuselage, causing damage to the airplane, and
could result in reduced control or performance of the airplane.

(f) Compliance

    Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.

(g) Required Actions

    For airplanes with an original airworthiness certificate or
original export certificate of airworthiness issued on or before the
effective date of this AD: Except as specified by paragraph (h) of
this AD; at the applicable times specified in the ``Compliance''
paragraph of Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin B787-81205-SB780043-
00 RB, Issue 001, dated January 15, 2021, do all applicable actions
for Group 1, Configuration 1 airplanes as identified in, and in
accordance with, the Accomplishment Instructions of Boeing Alert
Requirements Bulletin B787-81205-SB780043-00 RB, Issue 001, dated
January 15, 2021.
    Note 1 to paragraph (g): Guidance for accomplishing the actions
required by this AD can be found in Boeing Alert Service Bulletin
B787-81205-SB780043-00, Issue 001, dated January 15, 2021, which is
referred to in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin B787-81205-
SB780043-00 RB, Issue 001, dated January 15, 2021.

(h) Exceptions to Service Information Specifications

    (1) Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin B787-81205-
SB780043-00 RB, Issue 001, dated January 15, 2021, uses the phrase
``the issue 001 date of Requirements Bulletin B787-81205-SB780043-00
RB,'' this AD requires using ``the effective date of this AD.''
    (2) Where Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin B787-81205-
SB780043-00 RB, Issue 001, dated January 15, 2021, specifies
contacting Boeing for repair instructions or for instructions to
address certain conditions: This AD requires doing the repair or
doing the instructions using a method approved in accordance with
the procedures specified in paragraph (j) of this AD.

(i) Parts Installation Limitations

    (1) As of the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph
(i)(1)(i) or (ii) of this AD, no person may install on any airplane
a TR with serial number between 00110001 and 00312001 inclusive, on
which all applicable inspections and corrective actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD have not been accomplished.
    (i) For airplanes with an original airworthiness certificate or
original export certificate of airworthiness issued on or before the
effective date of this AD: After accomplishing the actions required
by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (ii) For airplanes with an original airworthiness certificate or
original export certificate of airworthiness issued after the
effective date of this AD: As of the effective date of this AD.
    (2) As of the applicable compliance time specified in paragraph
(i)(2)(i) or (ii) of this AD, no person may install on any airplane
a TR translating sleeve with serial number 00125001 and subsequent,
on which all applicable inspections and corrective actions required
by paragraph (g) of this AD have not been accomplished.
    (i) For airplanes with an original airworthiness certificate or
original export certificate of airworthiness issued on or before the
effective date of this AD: After accomplishing the actions required
by paragraph (g) of this AD.
    (ii) For airplanes with an original airworthiness certificate or
original export certificate of airworthiness issued after the
effective date of this AD: As of the effective date of this AD.
    (3) As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install a
TR translating sleeve that was originally installed on any airplane
with an original airworthiness certificate or original export
certificate of airworthiness issued after the effective date of this
AD; or a TR translating sleeve with serial number 00125001 and
subsequent, on which all applicable inspections and corrective
actions specified in Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin B787-81205-
SB780043-00 RB, Issue 001, dated January 15, 2021, have been
accomplished; on any airplane with a TR with a serial number between
00110001 and 00312001 inclusive, unless all applicable inspections
and corrective actions specified in Boeing Alert Requirements
Bulletin B787-81205-SB780043-00 RB, Issue 001, dated January 15,
2021, have been accomplished on that TR, except as specified in
paragraph (h)(2) of this AD.

(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)

    (1) The Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found
in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request
to your principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office,
as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of
the certification office, send it to the attention of the person
identified in Related Information. Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
    (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
    (3) An AMOC that provides an acceptable level of safety may be
used for any repair, modification, or alteration required by this AD
if it is approved by The Boeing Company Organization Designation
Authorization (ODA) that has been authorized by the

Manager, Seattle ACO Branch, FAA, to make those findings. To be
approved, the repair method, modification deviation, or alteration
deviation must meet the certification basis of the airplane, and the
approval must specifically refer to this AD.

(k) Related Information

    For more information about this AD, contact Tak Kobayashi,
Aerospace Engineer, Propulsion Section, FAA, Seattle ACO Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax: 206-231-
3553; email: [email protected].

(l) Material Incorporated by Reference

    (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
    (2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
    (i) Boeing Alert Requirements Bulletin B787-81205-SB780043-00
RB, Issue 001, dated January 15, 2021.
    (ii) [Reserved]
    (3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Boeing Commercial Airplanes, Attention: Contractual & Data Services
(C&DS), 2600 Westminster Blvd., MC 110-SK57, Seal Beach, CA 90740-
5600; telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>; internet https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
    (4) You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (5) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, [email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.

    Issued on November 17, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2022-00038 Filed 1-10-22; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 70 (Monday, April 13, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 19660]
[FR Doc No: 2015-08427]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[9926-13-Region 9]

San Gabriel Valley Area 2 Superfund Site; Proposed Notice of
Administrative Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund
Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. 9600 et
seq., notice is hereby given that a proposed Agreement and Covenant Not
to Sue (Prospective Purchaser Agreement) associated with the San
Gabriel Valley Area 2 Superfund Site was executed by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on March 25, 2015. The proposed
Prospective Purchaser Agreement would resolve certain potential claims
of the United States under sections 106 and 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C.
9606 and 9607(a) against Reichhold LLC, a Delaware corporation (the
Purchaser). The Purchaser plans to acquire Reichhold, Inc.'s chemical
plant, comprising approximately 8.878 acres, located at 237 South Motor
Avenue, Azusa, California, within the Baldwin Park Operable Unit (BPOU)
of the San Gabriel Valley Area 2 Superfund Site. The proposed
settlement would provide the following benefit to EPA: The purchaser
will pay $800,000 in cash, to be held in reserve in a special account
for future cleanup work at the BPOU, as needed. Reichhold, Inc., is not
a signatory to the Prospective Purchaser Agreement. The Purchaser is
not directly affiliated with Reichhold, Inc.
    For 30 calendar days following the date of publication of this
notice, EPA will receive written comments relating to the proposed
settlement. EPA's response to any comments received will be available
for public inspection at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105.

DATES: Submit comments on or before May 13, 2015.

ADDRESSES: The proposed Prospective Purchaser Agreement is available
for public inspection at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. The document can be accessed
through the Internet on EPA Region 9's Web site located at: http://www.epa.gov/region09/waste/brown/ppa.html.
    A copy of the proposed settlement may also be obtained from Janet
A. Magnuson, Assistant Regional Counsel, (ORC-3), Office of Regional
Counsel, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco 94105.
Comments should reference ``Reichhold, LLC PPA, San Gabriel Valley Area
2 Superfund Site'' and ``Docket No. 2015-04'' and should be addressed
to Janet A. Magnuson at the above address.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Janet Magnuson, Assistant Regional
Counsel (ORC-3), Office of Regional Counsel, U.S. EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105; phone:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax:
(415) 947-3570; email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
    Dated: March 31, 2015.
Enrique Manzanilla,
Superfund Division Director, U.S. EPA Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2015-08427 Filed 4-10-15; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register: August 4, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 149)]
[Notices]
[Page 47052-47053]
[DOCID:fr04au10-104]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-62598; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2010-48]

 Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Order Approving
a Proposed Rule Change Relating to the Guaranteed Allocation for Lead
Market Makers and Directed Order Market Makers

July 29, 2010.
    On June 8, 2010, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``NYSE Arca'' or the
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a
proposed rule change relating to the guaranteed allocation for Lead
Market Makers (``LMM''s) and Directed Order Market Makers (``DOMM''s).
Notice of the proposed rule change was published for comment in the
Federal Register on June 29, 2010.\3\ The Commission received no
comments on the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62328 (June 21,
2010), 75 FR 37516.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Generally, incoming marketable orders are allocated among contra
side orders resting on the NYSE Arca Consolidated Book at the same
price on the basis of time priority. Exchange Rule 6.76A nonetheless
provides an exception to this principle: When an LMM or DOMM is quoting
on the book at the National Best Bid or Offer (``NBBO''), the LMM or
DOMM receives a guaranteed allocation of 40% of the incoming order
ahead of any other non-Customer interest ranked earlier in time. Rule
6.76A further provides that if a Customer order is ranked earlier than
the LMM or DOMM, the Customer order is filled first. The LMM or DOMM
then receives its 40% guarantee out of the remainder, if any, of the
incoming order, and any other non-Customer is filled from the balance
on the basis of time priority.
    According to the Exchange, in the latter situation, non-Customers
have submitted orders that set a new price, only to find themselves
left with just a small portion of an incoming order, because Customer
orders at the same price must be satisfied first, and 40% of the
balance is allocated to the LMM or DOMM before the price-setter can
receive any allocation. Thus, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.76A
to provide that the guaranteed allocation will not apply if there are
Customer orders on the Consolidated Book ranked ahead of the LMM or
DOMM. In such a case, the incoming order will be allocated strictly on
the basis of time priority. The guarantee will apply only if there are
no resting Customer orders ranked ahead of the LMM or DOMM.
    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.\4\
In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is
consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\5\
which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national
securities exchange remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of
a free and open market and a national market system. The Commission
believes that eliminating the 40% guarantee for LMMs and DOMMs when
Customer orders are ranked ahead in the Consolidated Book is reasonable
to encourage non-Customer market participants to competitively price
their orders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,
that the proposed rule change (SR-NYSEArca-2010-48), be and hereby is
approved.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Florence E. Harmon,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-19223 Filed 8-3-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 16 (Thursday, January 24, 2013)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 5156-5158]
[FR Doc No: 2013-01355]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 117

[USCG-2012-1085]
RIN 1625-AA09

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; Christina River, Wilmington, DE

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to modify the operating schedule that
governs the Third Street Bridge at mile 2.3, the Walnut Street Bridge
at mile 2.8, and the Market Street Bridge at mile 3.0, all located on
the Christina River in Wilmington, DE. Since the three drawbridges are
located near one another and the few vessels that do transit this
waterway usually go through all three bridges, it is proposed that all
the bridges open on the same eight hour advance notice. This proposal
would change the current regulations by allowing the Third Street and
Walnut Street drawbridges to be opened in sequence with the same eight
hour advance notice currently given to the Market Street drawbridge.
This proposed schedule clarifies the sequencing of the three drawbridge
openings, and provides for the reasonable needs of navigation.

DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before March 11, 2013.

ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2012-1085 using any one of the following methods:
    (1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov.
    (2) Fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    (3) Mail or Delivery: Docket Management Facility (M30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001. Deliveries will
be accepted between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    See the ``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion
of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on
submitting comments. To avoid duplication, please use only one of these
methods.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or email Terrance A. Knowles, Environmental Protection
Specialist, Fifth Coast Guard District, at<PHONE_NUMBER>,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone<PHONE_NUMBER>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Acronyms

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Sec.  Section Symbol
U.S.C. United States Code

A. Public Participation and Request for Comments

    We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related material. All comments received will be posted,
without change to http://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.

1. Submitting Comments

    If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2012-1085), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online (http://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment online
via http://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand delivery, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an email address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
    To submit your comment online, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-1085) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. Click on the ``Submit a Comment'' on the line associated
with this notice of proposed rulemaking. If you submit your comments by
mail or hand delivery, submit them in an unbound format, no larger than
8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for copying and electronic filing. If you
submit them by mail and would like to know that they

reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard
or envelope. We will consider all comments and material received during
the comment period and may change the rule based on your comments.

2. Viewing Comments and Documents

    To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to http://www.regulations.gov,
type the docket number (USCG-2012-1085) in the ``SEARCH'' box and click
``SEARCH''. Click on Open Docket Folder on the line associated with
this notice of proposed rulemaking. You may also visit either the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.

3. Privacy Act

    Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008, issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).

4. Public Meeting

    We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. You may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.

B. Regulatory History and Information

    The current Drawbridge Operation Regulation, 33 CFR 117.237(c), for
the Christina River, Third Street drawbridge at mile 2.3 and the Walnut
Street drawbridge at mile 2.8, in Wilmington, DE requires both of the
bridges to open on signal, and that the Market Street drawbridge at
mile 3.0, open on signal with eight hours advance notice.

C. Basis and Purpose

    The Delaware Department of Transportation (DELDOT) who owns and
operates these bascule-type drawbridges has requested a permanent
change to the existing bridge regulations, allowing the Third Street
and Walnut Street bridges to also open on signal with eight hours
advance notice as does the Market Street Bridge. This proposed schedule
allows for all three of the drawbridges to be opened in sequence on the
same opening request if required. Vessel traffic on this part of the
Christina River consists of a few commercial and pleasure craft.
    Three vessels cause 97% of the openings at the three bridges: The
Kalmar Nyckel sail ship, the River Taxi, and the River Boat Queen. The
Market Street bridge has the most restrictive vertical clearance of the
three drawbridges (8 feet above mean high water), and was opened a
total 578 times in 2011. In 2011, the Walnut Street Bridge was opened
244 times and the Third Street Bridge was opened 250 times. The River
Taxi does not require an opening to pass under the Third and Walnut
Street Bridges.

D. Discussion of Proposed Rule

    Our proposed change to 33 CFR 117.237(c) would allow for a more
ordered process of transiting through the three draw spans while
providing for the reasonable needs of navigation. The Market Street
Drawbridge presently opens with 8 hours advance notice and it is
proposed that both the Third Street and Walnut Street bridges open on
the same 8 hour notice when needed.
    In addition, a text modification is required to remove the last
sentence in paragraph 117.237(c) ``The draws of these bridges shall
open at all times as soon as possible for passage of a public vessel of
the United States''. This sentence is being removed because it is
already addressed in paragraph 117.31(b)(1).

E. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on a number of these statutes or executive orders.

1. Regulatory Planning and Review

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
as supplemented by Executive Order 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, and does not require an assessment of potential
costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of Order 12866 or under
section 1 of Executive Order 13563. The Office of Management and Budget
has not reviewed it under those Orders.
    The proposed changes are expected to have minimal impact on
mariners due to the low number of vessels requiring openings on the
river. In addition, because an 8-hour advance notice is currently
required for the Market Street Bridge opening, it is understood that
time for passage through all three bridges, under the proposed rule,
will be consistent with the current regulation.

2. Impact on Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered the impact of this proposed rule on small entities. The
Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
    This proposed rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities because only a few vessels transit
through all three of the bridges and it is rare that in such cases any
vessel stops between the three bridges. Most commercial traffic will
leave and return during the day. The proposed rule would possibly
affect small entities such as owners/operators of vessels needing to
transit through the three bridges but requiring more than eight feet of
vertical clearance (most restrictive bridge). These vessels can
minimize delays and plan their transits in accordance with the proposed
opening schedule.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.

3. Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the rule would affect
your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you
have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance,
please contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT, above. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any
policy or action of the Coast Guard.

4. Collection of Information

    This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).

5. Federalism

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this proposed rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have implications for federalism.

6. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that
your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.

7. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this proposed rule will not
result in such expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.

8. Taking of Private Property

    This proposed rule would not cause a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.

9. Civil Justice Reform

    This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

10. Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.

11. Indian Tribal Governments

    This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

12. Energy Effects

    This proposed rule is not a ``significant energy action'' under
Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use because it is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and
is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply,
distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a
significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement
of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211.

13. Technical Standards

    This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.

14. Environment

    We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 023-01, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This proposed rule simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges.
This rule is categorically excluded under figure 2-1, paragraph
(32)(e), of the Instruction.
    Under figure 2-1, paragraph (32)(e), of the Instruction, an
environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are not required for this rule. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this proposed rule.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117

    Bridges.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:

PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  33 U.S.C. 499; 33 CFR 1.05-1; Department of Homeland
Security Delegation No. 0170.1.

0
2. In Sec.  117.237, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:

Sec.  117.237  Christina River.

* * * * *
    (c) The draws of the Third Street Bridge at mile 2.3, the Walnut
Street Bridge at mile 2.8, and the Market Street Bridge at mile 3.0,
located in Wilmington, DE shall all open on signal if at least eight
hours notice is given. From 7 a.m. to 8 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. to 5:30
p.m., Monday through Saturday except holidays, the draws of these three
bridges need not be opened for the passage of vessels. Any vessel which
has passed through one or more of these bridges immediately prior to a
closed period and which requires passage through the other bridge or
bridges in order to continue to its destination shall be passed through
the draw or draws of the bridge or bridges without delay.
* * * * *

    Dated: January 11, 2013.
Steven H. Ratti,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Fifth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2013-01355 Filed 1-23-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


[Federal Register Volume 82, Number 91 (Friday, May 12, 2017)]
[Notices]
[Page 22139]
[FR Doc No: 2017-09681]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Combined Notice of Filings #1

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
corporate filings:
    Docket Numbers: EC17-80-000.
    Applicants: Ebensburg Power Company, Babcock & Wilcox Ebensburg
Power, LLC, Ebensburg Investors Limited Partnership.
    Description: Supplement to February 16, 2017 Application for
Authorization of Disposition of Jurisdictional Facilities under Section
203 of the Federal Power Act of Ebensburg Power Company, et al.
    Filed Date: 5/3/17.
    Accession Number: 20170503-5163.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/17.

    Docket Numbers: EC17-110-000.
    Applicants: U.S. Gas & Electric, Inc., Energy Services Providers,
Inc., Massachusetts Gas & Electric, Inc., Connecticut Gas & Electric,
Inc., Equus Total Return, Inc.
    Description: Application for Authorization for Disposition of
Jurisdictional Facilities and Request for Waivers, Confidential
Treatment and Expedited Action of U.S. Gas & Electric, Inc., et al.
    Filed Date: 4/28/17.
    Accession Number: 20170428-5620.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/19/17.

    Docket Numbers: EC17-111-000.
    Applicants: CSOLAR IV West, LLC.
    Description: Application of CSOLAR IV West, LLC for Approval Under
Section 203 of the Federal Power Act and Request for Expedited Action.
    Filed Date: 5/1/17.
    Accession Number: 20170501-5436.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/22/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
rate filings:
    Docket Numbers: ER16-453-007.
    Applicants: Northeast Transmission Development, LLC, PJM
Interconnection, L.L.C.
    Description: Compliance filing: NTD submits compliance filing to
Order issued April 6, 2017 re: NTD Formula Rate to be effective 2/1/
2016.
    Filed Date: 5/3/17.
    Accession Number: 20170503-5128.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/24/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1160-001.
    Applicants: Entergy Arkansas, Inc.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: EAI MSS-4 Amended PPAs to be
effective 5/9/2017.
    Filed Date: 5/4/17.
    Accession Number: 20170504-5096.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/25/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1324-001.
    Applicants: Playa Solar 2, LLC.
    Description: Tariff Amendment: Amendment to MBR Tariff Application
to be effective 3/29/2017.
    Filed Date: 5/4/17.
    Accession Number: 20170504-5068.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/15/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1536-000.
    Applicants: Southern Power Company.
    Description: Petition for Limited Waiver of Southern Power Company
and Request for Shortened Comment Period and Expedited Action.
    Filed Date: 5/3/17.
    Accession Number: 20170503-5170.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/10/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1537-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SWEPCO-Tex-La SPP PSA 456
Change to be effective 5/15/2017.
    Filed Date: 5/4/17.
    Accession Number: 20170504-5062.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/25/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1538-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SWEPCO-Tex-La ERCOT PSA 456
Change to be effective 5/15/2017.
    Filed Date: 5/4/17.
    Accession Number: 20170504-5064.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/25/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1539-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SWEPCO-ETEC PSA 456 Change
to be effective 5/15/2017.
    Filed Date: 5/4/17.
    Accession Number: 20170504-5065.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/25/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1540-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SWEPCO-NTEC PSA 456 Change
to be effective 5/15/2017.
    Filed Date: 5/4/17.
    Accession Number: 20170504-5066.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/25/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1541-000.
    Applicants: Southwestern Electric Power Company.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: SWEPCO-ETEC-NTEC PSA 456
Change to be effective 5/15/2017.
    Filed Date: 5/4/17.
    Accession Number: 20170504-5067.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/25/17.

    Docket Numbers: ER17-1542-000.
    Applicants: ISO New England Inc., New England Power Pool
Participants Committee.
    Description: Sec.  205(d) Rate Filing: Market Rule 1 Revisions to
Cap Offers from Fast-Start Resources to be effective 7/3/2017.
    Filed Date: 5/4/17.
    Accession Number: 20170504-5094.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/25/17.

    Take notice that the Commission received the following electric
securities filings:
    Docket Numbers: ES17-32-000.
    Applicants: Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc.
    Description: Application under Section 204 of the Federal Power Act
for Authorization to Issue Securities of Golden Spread Electric
Cooperative, Inc.
    Filed Date: 5/1/17.
    Accession Number: 20170501-5435.
    Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/22/17.

    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system by
clicking on the links or querying the docket number.
    Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above
proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the
Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5:00
p.m. Eastern Time on the specified comment date. Protests may be
considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the
proceeding.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call<PHONE_NUMBER>
(toll free). For TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.

    Dated: May 4, 2017.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2017-09681 Filed 5-11-17; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


Nathalie Simon/DC/USEPA/US

03/12/2008 03:12 PM

To

<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> cc

Ron Evans/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Al McGartland/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Bryan Hubbell, Elizabeth Kopits/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Cynthia Morgan/DC/USEPA/US@EPA, Janet Cakir/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA, Thomas Gillis/DC/USEPA/US@EPA

Subject

UVB Appendix

Dear Heidi and Margo --

Attached please find the revised UVB appendix reflecting the following changes:

the last sentence of the introduction has been removed

Individual peer review reports have been removed from the Appendix and will be placed in the docket (see supplemental materials below)

Individual peer review reports are no longer attributed by name to specific reviewers.

"Do not cite or quote" has been removed from the footer of the ICF report

A footnote has been added to the introductory section indicating that the peer review reports are available in the docket.

Unless I've missed something or unless you have additional changes, I believe we can close out this Appendix.

Ron, please let me know what more, if anything, you need from me to get these supplemental files in the docket.  Also, I assume that any additional formatting changes (page numbering, etc.) will be handled on your end unless I hear from you otherwise.

***************************************************************

Nathalie B. Simon,  PhD

Associate Director

National Center for Environmental Economics

USEPA, Mail Code 1809T

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC  20460

ph:<PHONE_NUMBER>  fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>

**************************************************************


[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 228 (Tuesday, November 27, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70747-70748]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28649]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-HQ-OECA-2012-0531; FRL-9524-7]

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment Request; NSPS for Surface Coating of Large
Appliances (Renewal)

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection
Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing
approved collection. The ICR which is abstracted below describes the
nature of the collection and the estimated burden and cost.

DATES: Additional comments may be submitted on or before December 27,
2012.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, referencing docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OECA-2012-0531, to: (1) EPA online, using www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or by mail to:
EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC), Environmental Protection Agency,
Enforcement and Compliance Docket and Information Center, mail code
28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20460; and (2) OMB
at: Office of

Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA, 725 17th Street NW.,
Washington, DC 20503.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Learia Williams, Monitoring,
Assistance, and Media Programs Division, Office of Compliance, Mail
Code 2227A, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW., Washington, DC 20460; telephone number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; fax
number:<PHONE_NUMBER>; email address<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has submitted the following ICR to OMB
for review and approval according to the procedures prescribed in 5 CFR
1320.12. On August 9, 2012 (77 FR 47631), EPA sought comments on this
ICR pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received no comments. Any
additional comments on this ICR should be submitted to both EPA and OMB
within 30 days of this notice.
    EPA has established a public docket for this ICR under docket ID
number EPA-HQ-OECA-2012-0531, which is available for public viewing
online at http://www.regulations.gov, or in person viewing at the
Enforcement and Compliance Docket in the EPA Docket Center (EPA/DC),
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC. The
EPA Docket Center Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Reading Room is<PHONE_NUMBER>, and the telephone number
for the Enforcement and Compliance Docket is<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Use EPA's electronic docket and comment system at http://www.regulations.gov to either submit or view public comments, access
the index listing of the contents of the docket, and to access those
documents in the docket that are available electronically. Once in the
system, select ``docket search,'' then key in the docket ID number
identified above. Please note that EPA's policy is that public
comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be made
available for public viewing at http://www.regulations.gov as EPA
receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidentiality of Business Information (CBI), or
other information whose public disclosure is restricted by statute. For
further information about the electronic docket, go to
www.regulations.gov.
    Title: NSPS for Surface Coating of Large Appliances (Renewal).
    ICR Numbers: EPA ICR Number 0659.12, OMB Control Number 2060-0108.
    ICR Status: This ICR is scheduled to expire on December 31, 2012.
Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to either conduct or
sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending
at OMB.

Abstract

    The affected entities are subject to the General Provisions of the
NSPS at 40 CFR part 60, subpart A and any changes, or additions to the
Provisions specified at 40 CFR part 60, subpart SS.
    Owners or operators of the affected facilities must make an initial
notification, performance tests, periodic reports, and maintain records
of the occurrence and duration of any startup, shutdown, or malfunction
in the operation of an affected facility, or any period during which
the monitoring system is inoperative. Reports are also required
semiannually.

Burden Statement

    The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this
collection of information is estimated to average 27 hours per
response. ``Burden'' means the total time, effort, or financial
resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or
disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This
includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of
collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and
maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information;
adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable
instructions and requirements which have subsequently changed; train
personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search
data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and
transmit or otherwise disclose the information.
    Respondents/Affected Entities: Facilities that conduct surface
coating operations for large appliances.
    Estimated Number of Respondents: 72.
    Frequency of Response: Occasionally and semiannually.
    Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 7,659.
    Estimated Total Annual Cost: $750,011, which includes $741,611 in
labor costs, no capital/startup costs, and $8,400 in operation and
maintenance (O&M) costs.
    Changes in the Estimates: There is no change in the labor hours in
this ICR compared to the previous ICR. This is due to two
considerations: (1) The regulations have not changed over the past
three years and are not anticipated to change over the next three
years; and (2) the growth rate for the industry is very low, negative
or non-existent, so there is no significant change in the overall
burden. However, there is an adjustment increase in burden costs for
both the respondents and the Agency. The cost increase is due to an
adjustment in labor rates. This ICR uses updated labor rates from the
Bureau of Labor Statistics to calculate burden costs.
    Additionally, there is an increase in the total number of annual
responses due to a mathematical correction made in the previous ICR.

John Moses,
Director, Collection Strategies Division.
[FR Doc. 2012-28649 Filed 11-26-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 245 (Monday, December 22, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 76437]
[FR Doc No: 2014-29895]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Agency Information Collection Activities: Requests for Comments;
Clearance of Renewed Approval of Information Collection: Aircraft
Registration Renewal

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

ACTION: Notice and request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, FAA
invites public comments about our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) approval to renew an information
collection. The information collected on an Aircraft Registration
Renewal Application, AC Form 8050-1B, is used by the FAA to verify and
update aircraft registration information collected for an aircraft when
it was first registered.

DATES: Written comments should be submitted by February 20, 2015.

ADDRESSES: Send comments to the FAA at the following address: Ms. Kathy
DePaepe, Room 126B, Federal Aviation Administration, ASP-110, 6500 S.
MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City, OK 73169.
    Public Comments Invited: You are asked to comment on any aspect of
this information collection, including (a) Whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for FAA's performance; (b) the
accuracy of the estimated burden; (c) ways for FAA to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (d)
ways that the burden could be minimized without reducing the quality of
the collected information. The agency will summarize and/or include
your comments in the request for OMB's clearance of this information
collection.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kathy DePaepe at<PHONE_NUMBER>, or by
email at<EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    OMB Control Number: 2120-0729.
    Title: Aircraft Registration Renewal.
    Form Numbers: AC Form 8050-1B.
    Type of Review: Renewal of an information collection.
    Background: The information collected on an Aircraft Registration
Renewal Application (AC Form 8050-1B) is used by the FAA to verify and
update the aircraft registration information collected for an aircraft
when it was first registered. The updated registration database will
then be used by the FAA to monitor and control U.S. airspace and to
distribute safety notices and airworthiness directives to aircraft
owners.
    Respondents: Approximately 72,996 aircraft owners.
    Frequency: Information is collected triennially.
    Estimated Average Burden per Response: 30 minutes.
    Estimated Total Annual Burden: 36,498 hours.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on December 17, 2014.
Albert R. Spence,
FAA Assistant Information Collection Clearance Officer, IT Enterprises
Business Services Division, AES-200.
[FR Doc. 2014-29895 Filed 12-19-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P


orwarded by Marjorie Jones/RTP/USEPA/US on 08/13/2007 10:29 AM -----

"Johansson, Robert"<EMAIL_ADDRESS> 06/15/2007 12:00 PM

To

Marjorie Jones/RTP/USEPA/US@EPA

cc

Subject

RE: can you clarify your comment on the NAAQS?

Hi Margie,

Does this help?

>>>

We are referring to page 9 and 39 of the benefits chapter.

Specifically, CASAC's comments (p. 9) noted in the paragraph beginning

"With respect to time-series studies..." and (p. 39) the paragraph

beginning "The Ozone Criteria Document..."

Together, these passages note three aspects of the "blunt" nature

regarding time series results:

-- Power of time-series design for disentangling effects of copollutants

when looking at small estimates

-- Plausibility of ozone-only causality given that people with

preexisting conditions spend most of their time indoors where ozone

concentrations are lower.

-- Meteorology

________________________________________________

Robert Johansson, Ph.D.

OMB/OIRA/NREA

725 17th St. NW, Room 10202

Washington, DC 20503

(P)<PHONE_NUMBER>

(F)<PHONE_NUMBER>

(E<EMAIL_ADDRESS>

-----Original Message-----

From<EMAIL_ADDRESS> <EMAIL_ADDRESS> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2007 10:57 AM

To: Johansson, Robert

Cc<EMAIL_ADDRESS><EMAIL_ADDRESS> Subject: can you clarify your comment on the NAAQS?

Rob -- Dave McKee has asked me for the RIA language referenced in your

comments (attached) and we can't figure out what/where it is.  Can you

help?

Thanks, Margie

Marjorie C. Jones

Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards

Air Benefit and Cost Group, Mail Code C439-02

Health and Environmental Impacts Division

RTP, NC 27711

voice:<PHONE_NUMBER>

fax:<PHONE_NUMBER>