[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 219 (Thursday, November 13, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Pages 67508-67519]
[FR Doc No: 2014-26815]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-73554; File No. SR-NYSE-2014-56]

Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change
Amending Its Rules Concerning Supervision To Harmonize the Rules With
Certain Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. Rules and Making
Other Conforming Changes

November 6, 2014.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on October 24, 2014, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE'' or
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``SEC'' or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have been substantially prepared by
the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. The
Exchange has designated the proposed rule change as constituting a
``non-controversial'' rule change under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) of the Act,\3\
which renders the proposal effective upon receipt of this filing by the
Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to amend NYSE rules concerning supervision to
harmonize the rules with certain Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') rules and make other conforming changes.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web
site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to amend its rules concerning supervision to
harmonize the rules with certain FINRA rules and make other conforming
changes. Set forth below are descriptions of the harmonization process,
the current NYSE rules, and the proposed NYSE rules. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to: (1) Adopt new rule text that is substantially
similar to FINRA Rules 3110, 3120, 3150, and 3170; (2) delete Rule 342
and related Rule Interpretations (except for certain text in Rule
342.13 and related Rule Interpretation regarding qualifications and
exam requirements for individuals with supervisory responsibilities),
Rule 351(e) and related Rule Interpretations, Rule 354, Rule 401, and
Rule 401A; and (3) make other conforming changes.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ References to rules are to NYSE rules unless otherwise
indicated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Background
    On July 30, 2007, FINRA's predecessor, the National Association of
Securities Dealers, Inc. (``NASD''), and NYSE Regulation, Inc.
(``NYSER'') consolidated their member firm regulation operations into a
combined organization, FINRA. Pursuant to Rule 17d-2 under the Act,\5\
the Exchange, NYSER, and FINRA entered into an agreement
(``Agreement'') to reduce regulatory duplication for their members by
allocating to FINRA certain regulatory responsibilities for NYSE rules
and rule interpretations (``FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules''). NYSE MKT
LLC (``NYSE MKT'') became a party to the Agreement effective December
15, 2008.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ 17 CFR 240.17d-2.
    \6\ See Exchange Act Release Nos. 56148 (Jul. 26, 2007), 72 FR
42146 (Aug. 1, 2007) (order approving the Agreement); 56147 (Jul.
26, 2007), 72 FR 42166 (Aug. 1, 2007) (SR-NASD-2007-054) (order
approving the incorporation of certain NYSE Rules as ``Common
Rules''); 60409 (Jul. 30, 2009), 74 FR 39353 (Aug. 6, 2009) (order
approving the amended and restated Agreement, adding NYSE MKT LLC as
a party). Paragraph 2(b) of the Agreement sets forth procedures
regarding proposed changes by FINRA, NYSE or NYSE MKT to the
substance of any of the Common Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As part of its effort to reduce regulatory duplication and relieve
firms that are members of FINRA, the Exchange, and NYSE MKT of
conflicting or unnecessary regulatory burdens, FINRA is now engaged in
the process of reviewing and amending the NASD and FINRA Incorporated
NYSE Rules in order to create a consolidated FINRA rulebook.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ FINRA's rulebook currently has three sets of rules: (1) NASD
Rules, (2) FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules, and (3) consolidated FINRA
Rules. The FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules apply only to those members
of FINRA that are also members of the NYSE (``Dual Members''), while
the consolidated FINRA Rules apply to all FINRA members. For more
information about the FINRA rulebook consolidation process, see
FINRA Information Notice, dated March 12, 2008.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA recently harmonized NASD and FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules
and interpretations concerning supervision. More particularly, FINRA:
(1) Adopted FINRA Rules 3110 and 3120 to largely replace NASD Rules
3010 and 3012, respectively; (2) incorporated into FINRA Rule 3110 and
its supplementary material the requirements of NASD IM-1000-4, NASD IM-
3010-1, FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rule 401A, and FINRA Incorporated NYSE
Rule 342.21; (3) replaced NASD Rule 3010(b)(2) with new FINRA Rule
3170; (4) replaced NASD Rule 3110(i) with new FINRA Rule 3150; and (5)
deleted the following FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rules and NYSE Rule
Interpretations: (i) NYSE Rule 342 and related NYSE Rule
Interpretations; (ii) NYSE Rule 343 and related NYSE Rule
Interpretations; (iii) NYSE Rule 351(e) and related NYSE Rule
Interpretation; (iv) NYSE Rule 354; (v) NYSE Rule 401; and (vi) NYSE
Rule 401A.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Exchange Act Release No. 71179 (Dec. 23, 2013), 78 FR
79542 (Dec. 30, 2013) (SR-FINRA-2013-025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA has announced that the effective date for the rule change
will be December 1, 2014. The Exchange proposes to make its proposed
rule change effective on the same date as FINRA, and will announce the
effective date via an Information Memo.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ There is one exception. Effective as of April 7, 2014, in
order to coincide with related changes to Form BR, the Exchange
deleted NYSE Rule 343 and the related interpretations and FINRA
deleted the related FINRA Incorporated NYSE Rule and NYSE Rule
Interpretations. See FINRA Regulatory Notices 14-10 and 14-11 and
Exchange Act Release No. 71989 (Apr. 22, 2014), 79 FR 23391 (Apr.
28, 2014) (SR-NYSE-2014-21). See also Exchange Act Release No. 73325
(Oct. 9, 2014), 79 FR 61360 (Oct. 10, 2014) (SR-NYSE-2014-55)
(conforming amendments related to the deletion of NYSE Rule 343).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Current Supervision Rules and Interpretations
    Rule 342(a) requires each office, department or business activity
of a member or member organization (including foreign incorporated
branch offices) to be under the supervision and control of the member
or member

organization establishing it and of the personnel delegated such
authority and responsibility. The person in charge of a group of
employees must reasonably discharge his duties and obligations in
connection with supervision and control of the activities of those
employees related to the business of their employer and compliance with
securities laws and regulations.
    Rule 342(b) provides that the general partners or directors of each
member organization must provide for appropriate supervisory control
and must designate a general partner or principal executive to assume
overall authority and responsibility for internal supervision and
control of the organization and compliance with securities' laws and
regulations. This person must:
     Delegate to qualified principals or employees
responsibility and authority for supervision and control of each
office, department or business activity, and provide for appropriate
procedures of supervision and control; and
     Establish a separate system of follow-up and review to
determine that the delegated authority and responsibility is being
properly exercised.
    Rule 342(c) provides that a member organization must provide notice
to the Exchange of each branch office established by such member
organization.
    Rule 342(d) provides that qualified persons acceptable to the
Exchange must be in charge of:
     Any office of a member or member organization;
     Any regional or other group of offices; and
     Any sales department or activity.
    Rule 342(e) provides that the amounts and types of credit extended
by a member organization must be supervised by members or principal
executives qualified by experience for such control in the types of
business in which the member organization extends credit.
    Supplementary Materials 342.10-.30 provide additional guidance
relating to the definition of branch offices, annual fees, foreign
branch offices, the acceptability of supervisors, the experience of
senior management, small offices, the supervision of registered
representatives, the review of communications with the public,
bookkeeping, the supervision of producing managers, information
requests, trade review and investigation, the definition of related
financial instrument, internal controls, annual branch office
inspection, risk-based surveillance and branch office identification,
criteria for inspection programs, and annual reports and
certifications. The related Rule 342 Interpretations provide further
guidance relating to the foregoing.
    Rule 351(e) provides that each member not associated with a member
organization and a principal executive of each member organization must
take one or both of the following two actions in relation to the trades
that are subject to the review procedures required by Rule 342.21(a):
     Sign a written statement in the form specified in the rule
and deliver it to the Exchange by the 15th day of the month following
the calendar quarter in which the trade occurred.
     As to any such trade that is the subject of an internal
investigation pursuant to Rule 342.21(b), but has not been both
resolved and included in the written statement, report in writing to
the Exchange:
     The commencement of the internal investigation, the
identity of the trade, and the reason why the trade could not be the
subject of the written statement (report by the 15th day of the month,
following the calendar quarter in which the trade occurred);
     the quarterly progress of each open investigation (report
by the 15th day of the month following the quarter); and
     the completion of the investigation, detailing the
methodology and results of the investigation, any internal disciplinary
action taken, and any referral of the matter to the Exchange, another
self-regulatory organization (``SRO''), the Commission or another
Federal agency, and including, where no internal disciplinary action
has been taken and no such referral has been made, a written statement
in relation to the trade in the form specified below (report within one
week after completion of the investigation).
    Rule 351(e) also provides that when a statement pertains to one or
more trades that have been the subject of an internal investigation
pursuant to Rule 342.21(b) but as to which no internal disciplinary
action has been taken and no referral of the matter to the Exchange,
another SRO, or a Federal agency has been made, the written statement
must also refer to the particular trade(s) (rather than to the trades
of a particular calendar quarter) and must omit the clause excepting
trades reported as the subject of an investigation. The related Rule
351 Interpretations provide additional guidance relating to the
foregoing.
    Rule 354(a) provides that, by April 1 of each year, each member
organization must submit a copy of its Rule 342.30 annual report on
supervision and compliance to its control person(s) or, if the member
organization has no control person, to the audit committee of its Board
of Directors or its equivalent committee or group. In the case of a
control person that is an organization (a ``controlling
organization''), the member organization must submit the report to the
general counsel of the controlling organization and to the audit
committee of the controlling organization's Board of Directors or its
equivalent committee or group.
    Rule 354(b) provides that, for the purpose of Rule 354(a),
``control person'' means a person who controls the member organization
within the meaning of Rule 2 otherwise than solely by virtue of being a
director, general partner, or principal executive (or person occupying
a similar status or performing similar functions) of the member
organization.
    Rule 401(b) provides that each member and member organization must
maintain written policies and procedures, administered pursuant to the
internal control requirements prescribed under Rule 342.23,
specifically with respect to the following activities:
     Transmittals of funds (e.g., wires, checks, etc.) or
securities:
     From customer accounts to third party accounts (i.e., a
transmittal that would result in a change of beneficial ownership);
     from customer accounts to outside entities (e.g., banks,
investment companies, etc.);
     from customer accounts to locations other than a
customer's primary residence (e.g., post office box, ``in care of''
accounts, alternate address, etc.); and
     between customers and registered representatives
(including the hand-delivery of checks).
     Customer changes of address.
     Customer changes of investment objectives.
    The policies and procedures required under Rule 401(b)(1), (2), and
(3) must include a means/method of customer confirmation, notification,
or follow-up that can be documented.
    Rule 401A(a) provides that, for every customer complaint they
receive that is subject to the reporting requirements of Rule 4530(d),
members and member organizations must:
     Acknowledge receipt of the complaint within 15 business
days of receiving it; and
     Respond to the issues raised in the complaint within a
reasonable period of time.
    Rule 401A(b) provides that each acknowledgement and response

required by this rule must be conveyed to the complaining customer by
an appropriate method. More specifically:
     Acknowledgements and responses to written complaints must
be either:
     In writing, mailed to the complaining customer's last
known address; or
     Electronically transmitted to the email address from which
the complaint was sent (method only permissible for electronically
transmitted complaints).
     Acknowledgements and responses to verbal complaints must
be either:
     In writing, mailed to the complaining customer's last
known address; or
     Made verbally to the complaining customer, and recorded in
a log of verbal acknowledgements and responses to customer complaints.
    Rule 401A(c) provides that written records of the acknowledgements,
responses, and logs required by this rule must be retained in
accordance with Rule 440.
Proposed Rule Change
    The Exchange proposes to delete the foregoing rules and
interpretations relating to supervision (except as noted below), which
are, in main part, either duplicative of, or do not align with, the
proposed supervision requirements discussed below, and adopt the text
of FINRA Rules 3110, 3120, 3150, and 3170, subject to certain technical
and conforming changes.\10\ As noted in Rule 0, NYSE rules that refer
to NYSER, NYSER staff or departments, Exchange staff, and Exchange
departments should be understood as also referring to FINRA staff and
FINRA departments acting on behalf of the Exchange pursuant to the
Agreement, as applicable.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ The technical and conforming changes are that the Exchange
would: (1) substitute the term ``member organization'' for
``member,'' (2) substitute the term ``Exchange'' for ``FINRA,'' (3)
change certain cross-references to FINRA rules to cross-references
to Exchange rules, and (4) add supplementary material to define the
term ``associated person'' in proposed Rules 3110, 3120, and 3150.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to retain the requirements contained in Rule
342.13(a) and (b) and related interpretations regarding qualifications
and exam requirements for individuals with supervisory
responsibilities. The proposed new version of Rule 342(a),
corresponding to current Rule 342.13(a), would provide that any member
or employee identified as in charge of (1) any office of a member or
member organization, (2) any regional or other group of offices, or (3)
any sales department or activity must have a creditable record and pass
the General Securities Sales Supervisor Qualification Examination
(Series 9/10) or another examination acceptable to the Exchange. The
proposed new version of Rule 342(a) would retain the current
requirement in the Interpretation to Rule 342 that every branch office
or sales manager must have at least three years' experience as a
registered representative or substantial experience in a related sales
or managerial position and must pass the Series 9/10.
    Further, the proposed new version of Rule 342(a) would retain the
current examples of a related sales or managerial position in the
Interpretation to Rule 342 and the requirement that in order to qualify
as a supervisory person, a principal executive \11\ should have at
least three years' experience as a registered representative unless
granted an exception. The proposed new version of Rule 342(a) would
also retain from the related Interpretation that the General Securities
Principal Examination (Series 24) is an acceptable alternative for
persons whose duties do not include the supervision of options or
municipal securities sales activity and that the examination
requirement may be waived at the discretion of the Exchange. Finally,
the proposed new version of Rule 342(a) would retain the requirement
from the Interpretation that in the case of a firm applying for
registered broker-dealer status, the supervisory candidates must have
at least one year of direct experience or two years of related
experience in the subject area to be supervised in addition to the
requirements outlined above.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ The Interpretation to Rule 342 refers to ``allied
members,'' a category the Exchange eliminated and replaced with
``principal executive,'' which has substantially the same meaning.
See Exchange Act Release No. 58549 (Sept. 15, 2008), 73 FR 54444
(Sept. 19, 2008) (SR-NYSE-2008-80).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The proposed new version of Rule 342(b), corresponding to current
Rule 342.13(b), would provide that the individuals designated as having
day-to-day compliance responsibilities for their respective firms, or
who supervise ten or more persons engaged in compliance activities,
have the knowledge necessary to carry out their job responsibilities
(i.e., overall knowledge of the securities laws and Exchange rules) and
pass the Compliance Official Examination (the ``Series 14'') or, in the
case of compliance supervisors of member organizations that conduct a
Designated Market Maker (``DMM'') business, the DMM Compliance Official
Examination (the ``Series 14A''). The proposed new version of Rule
342(b) would also retain the current requirement in the Interpretation
to Rule 342 that member organizations engaged in a public business in
addition to a DMM business must have a qualified compliance supervisor
who has passed both the Series 14 and Series 14A Examinations. Finally,
the proposed new version of Rule 342(b) would incorporate the following
exemptions from the Series 14 Examination requirement (currently
contained in the Interpretation to Rule 342):
     Compliance supervisors at member organizations whose
activities are solely related to execution of orders on the Exchange
trading floor and who do not conduct any business with the public;
     Compliance supervisors at member organizations whose
commissions and other fees from public business (retail and
institutional) are under $500,000 in the preceding calendar year and
who introduce to another broker-dealer; and
     Supervisors of ten or more persons whose compliance
responsibilities are limited to the registration of member organization
employees with the various regulators and SROs.
Proposed Rule 3110 (Supervision)
    Proposed Rule 3110 is based primarily on requirements in the FINRA
rulebook and current Rule 342 relating to, among other things,
supervisory systems, written procedures, internal inspections, and
review of correspondence.
Proposed Rule 3110(a)
    Proposed Rule 3110(a) would cover supervisory systems and would
require each member organization to establish and maintain a system to
supervise the activities of each associated person that is reasonably
designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities laws and
regulations, and with applicable Exchange rules. Under the proposed
rule, final responsibility for proper supervision would rest with the
member organization. In addition, a member organization's supervisory
system would be required to provide, at a minimum, for the following:
     The establishment and maintenance of written procedures as
required by proposed Rule 3110.
     The designation, where applicable, of an appropriately
registered principal with authority to carry out the supervisory
responsibilities of the member organization for each type of business
in which it engages for which registration as a broker-dealer is
required.
     The registration and designation as a branch office or an
office of supervisory jurisdiction (``OSJ'') of each location,
including the main office, that

meets the definitions contained in proposed Rule 3110(e).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ Although to date the Exchange and FINRA have used the same
definition for ``branch office,'' the Exchange has not previously
designated OSJs. As such, the requirements relating to OSJs
described hereinafter would be new for member organizations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     The designation of one or more appropriately registered
principals in each OSJ and one or more appropriately registered
representatives or principals in each non-OSJ branch office with
authority to carry out the supervisory responsibilities assigned to
that office by the member organization.
     The assignment of each registered person to an
appropriately registered representative or principal who would be
responsible for supervising that person's activities.
     The use of reasonable efforts to determine that all
supervisory personnel are qualified, either by virtue of experience or
training, to carry out their assigned responsibilities.
     The participation of each registered representative and
registered principal, either individually or collectively, no less than
annually, in an interview or meeting conducted by persons designated by
the member organization at which compliance matters relevant to the
activities of the representative and principal are discussed, which may
occur in conjunction with the discussion of other matters and may be
conducted at a central or regional location or at the representative's
or principal's place of business.
Proposed Rule 3110(b)
    In proposed Rule 3110(b), the Exchange proposes to consolidate
provisions from current Rule 401A relating to the review of customer
complaints with various provisions and rules from the FINRA rulebook
that currently require written procedures, including provisions
relating to the supervision and review of registered representatives'
transactions and correspondence. In addition, proposed supplementary
material, which is discussed in detail below, would codify and expand
guidance in these areas.
    Proposed Rule 3110(b)(1) would address written procedures and would
require each member organization to establish, maintain, and enforce
written procedures to supervise the types of business in which it
engages and the activities of its associated persons that are
reasonably designed to achieve compliance with applicable securities
laws and regulations and applicable Exchange rules.
    Under proposed Rule 3110(b)(2), the supervisory procedures required
by proposed Rule 3110(b) would include procedures for the review by a
registered principal, evidenced in writing, of all transactions
relating to the investment banking or securities business of the member
organization.
    Consistent with FINRA Rule 3110(b)(3), proposed Rule 3110(b)(3)
would be marked ``Reserved.''
    Under proposed Rule 3110(b)(4), the supervisory procedures required
by proposed Rule 3110(b) would also include procedures for the review
of incoming and outgoing written (including electronic) correspondence
and internal communications relating to the member organization's
investment banking or securities business and be appropriate for the
member organization's business, size, structure, and customers. The
supervisory procedures would require the member organization's review
of:
     Incoming and outgoing written (including electronic)
correspondence to properly identify and handle in accordance with firm
procedures, customer complaints, instructions, funds and securities,
and communications that are of a subject matter that require review
under Exchange rules and federal securities laws; and
     Internal communications to properly identify those
communications that are of a subject matter that require review under
Exchange rules and federal securities laws.

Such reviews would be conducted by a registered principal and would be
evidenced in writing, either electronically or on paper. Those
communications subject to review would include (without limitation):
     Communications between non-research and research
departments concerning a research report's contents (Rule 472(b)(3)).
     Certain communications with the public that require a
principal's pre-approval (Rule 2210).
     The identification and reporting to the Exchange of
customer complaints (Rule 4530).\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ With respect to customer complaints, proposed Rule
3110(b)(5) also would affirmatively require members to capture,
acknowledge, and respond to all written (including electronic)
customer complaints.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Current Rule 401A requires firms to acknowledge and respond to all
customer complaints subject to the reporting requirements of current
Rule 4530(d). Previously, this meant that firms had to acknowledge and
respond to both written and oral customer complaints. However, as part
of the effort to harmonize the NASD and NYSE rules in the interim
period before completion of the Consolidated FINRA Rulebook, current
Rule 4530(d) was amended to limit the definition of ``customer
complaint'' to include only written complaints, thereby making the
definition substantially similar to that in FINRA Rule 4530(d).\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ The Exchange adopted the text of FINRA Rule 4530 to replace
comparable provisions in Rule 351. See Exchange Act Release No.
64785 (Jun. 30, 2011), 76 FR 39946 (Jul. 7, 2011) (SR-NYSE-2011-27).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 3110(b)(5), which requires a member organization's
supervisory procedures to include procedures to capture, acknowledge,
and respond to all written (including electronic) customer complaints,
essentially incorporates the customer complaint requirement in current
Rule 401A, including the limitation on including only written
(including electronic) customer complaints. The Exchange believes that
oral complaints are difficult to capture and assess, and that they
raise competing views as to the substance of the complaint being
alleged. Consequently, the Exchange believes that oral complaints do
not lend themselves as effectively to a review program as written
complaints, which are more readily documented and retained. However,
the Exchange reminds member organizations that the failure to address
any customer complaint, written or oral, may be a violation of Rule
2010.
    Under proposed Rule 3110(b)(6), the supervisory procedures required
by proposed Rule 3110(b) must set forth the supervisory system
established by the member organization pursuant to proposed Rule
3110(a), and would include:
     The titles, registration status, and locations of the
required supervisory personnel and the responsibilities of each
supervisory person as these relate to the types of business engaged in,
applicable securities laws and regulations, and Exchange rules.
     A record, preserved by the member organization for a
period of not less than three years, the first two years in an easily
accessible place, of the names of all persons who are designated as
supervisory personnel and the dates for which such designation is or
was effective.
     Procedures prohibiting associated persons who perform a
supervisory function from:
     Supervising their own activities; and
     Reporting to, or having their compensation or continued
employment determined by, a person or persons they are supervising.

     If a member organization determines, with respect to any
of its supervisory personnel, that compliance with the preceding two
bullets is not possible because of the member organization's size or a
supervisory personnel's position within the firm, the member
organization would be required to document:
     The factors the member organization used to reach such
determination; and
     How the supervisory arrangement with respect to such
supervisory personnel otherwise complies with proposed Rule 3110(a).
     Procedures reasonably designed to prevent the supervisory
system required pursuant to proposed Rule 3110(a) from being
compromised due to the conflicts of interest that may be present with
respect to the associated person being supervised, including the
position of such person, the revenue such person generates for the
firm, or any compensation that the associated person conducting the
supervision may derive from the associated person being supervised.
    Proposed Rule 3110(b)(7) would require a member organization to
keep and maintain a copy of its written supervisory procedures, or such
relevant portions, in each OSJ and at each location where supervisory
activities are conducted on behalf of the member organization. Each
member organization would be required to promptly amend its written
supervisory procedures to reflect changes in applicable securities laws
or regulations, including Exchange rules, and as changes occur in its
supervisory system. Each member organization would be responsible for
promptly communicating its written supervisory procedures and
amendments to all associated persons to whom such written supervisory
procedures and amendments are relevant based on their activities and
responsibilities.
Proposed Rule 3110(c)
    Proposed Rule 3110(c) would cover internal inspections. Proposed
Rule 3110(c)(1) would require each member organization to conduct a
review, at least annually (on a calendar-year basis), of the businesses
in which it engages. The review must be reasonably designed to assist
the member organization in detecting and preventing violations of, and
achieving compliance with, applicable securities laws and regulations,
and with applicable Exchange rules. Each member organization would be
required to review the activities of each office, which would include
the periodic examination of customer accounts to detect and prevent
irregularities or abuses. Each member organization would also be
required to retain a written record of the date upon which each review
and inspection is conducted.
    In addition, proposed Rule 3110(c)(1) would require each member
organization to inspect at least annually (on a calendar-year basis)
every OSJ and any branch office that supervises one or more non-branch
locations. Each member organization would also be required to inspect
at least every three years every branch office that does not supervise
one or more non-branch locations. In establishing how often to inspect
each non-supervisory branch office, the member organization would be
required to consider whether the nature and complexity of the
securities activities for which the location is responsible, the volume
of business done at the location, and the number of associated persons
assigned to the location require the non-supervisory branch office to
be inspected more frequently than every three years. If a member
organization establishes a more frequent inspection cycle, the member
organization would be required to ensure that at least every three
years, the inspection requirements enumerated in proposed Rule
3110(c)(2) have been met. The member organization's written supervisory
and inspection procedures would have to set forth the non-supervisory
branch office examination cycle, an explanation of the factors the
member organization used in determining the frequency of the
examinations in the cycle, and the manner in which a member
organization would comply with proposed Rule 3110(c)(2) if using more
frequent inspections than every three years.
    Under proposed Rule 3110(c)(1), each member organization would also
be required to inspect every non-branch location on a regular, periodic
schedule. In establishing such a schedule, the member organization
would be required to consider the nature and complexity of the
securities activities for which the location is responsible and the
nature and extent of contact with customers. The member organization's
written supervisory and inspection procedures would have to set forth
the schedule and an explanation regarding how the member organization
determined the frequency of the examination.
    Proposed Rule 3110(c)(2) would require that the inspection and
review by a member organization pursuant to proposed Rule 3110(c)(1) be
reduced to a written report and kept on file by the member organization
for a minimum of three years, unless the inspection is being conducted
pursuant to proposed Rule 3110(c)(1)(C) and the regular periodic
schedule is longer than a three-year cycle, in which case the report
would have to be kept on file at least until the next inspection report
has been written. If applicable to the location being inspected,
proposed Rule 3110(c)(2)(A) would require that location's written
inspection report to include, without limitation, the testing and
verification of the member organization's policies and procedures,
including supervisory policies and procedures in the following areas:
     Safeguarding of customer funds and securities;
     Maintaining books and records;
     Supervision of supervisory personnel;
     Transmittals of funds (e.g., wires or checks, etc.) or
securities from customers to third party accounts; from customer
accounts to outside entities (e.g., banks, investment companies, etc.);
from customer accounts to locations other than a customer's primary
residence (e.g., post office box, ``in care of'' accounts, alternate
address, etc.); and between customers and registered representatives,
including the hand-delivery of checks; and
     Changes of customer account information, including address
and investment objectives changes and validation of such changes.
    Under proposed Rules 3110(c)(2)(B) and 3110(c)(2)(C), a member
organization's policies and procedures regarding transmittals of funds
must include a means or method of customer confirmation, notification,
or follow-up that can be documented. Member organizations could use
reasonable risk-based criteria to determine the authenticity of the
transmittal instructions. The policies and procedures regarding changes
in customer account information would have to include, for each change
processed, a means or method of customer confirmation, notification, or
follow-up that can be documented and that complies with Rules 17a-
3(a)(17)(i)(B)(2) and 17a-3(a)(17)(i)(B)(3) under the Act.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 240.17a-3(a)(17)(i)(B)(2) and 17 CFR 240.17a-
3(a)(17)(i)(B)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Pursuant to proposed Rule 3110(c)(2)(D), if a member organization
does not engage in all of the activities enumerated in the bullets
immediately above at the location being inspected, the member
organization would be required to identify those activities in the
member organization's written supervisory procedures or the location's

written inspection report and document in the member organization's
written supervisory procedures or the location's written inspection
report that supervisory policies and procedures for such activities
must be in place at that location before the member organization can
engage in them.
    Under proposed Rule 3110(c)(3), for each inspection conducted
pursuant to the proposed rule, a member organization would be required
to:
     Have procedures reasonably designed to prevent the
effectiveness of inspections from being compromised due to conflicts of
interest that may be present with respect to the location being
inspected, including but not limited to, economic, commercial, or
financial interests in the associated persons and businesses being
inspected; and
     Ensure that the person conducting an inspection is not an
associated person assigned to the location or is not directly or
indirectly supervised by, or otherwise reporting to, an associated
person assigned to the location.
    Under the proposed rule, if a member organization determines that
compliance with these two bullets is not possible either because of a
member organization's size or its business model, the member
organization would be required to document in the inspection report
both the factors the member organization used to make its determination
and how the inspection otherwise complies with proposed Rule
3110(c)(1).
    By way of comparison, under current Rules 342.24 and 342.25, each
branch office must be inspected annually, unless the member
organization obtained an exemption by submitting to the Exchange
written policies and procedures for systematic risk-based surveillance
of its branch offices, in which case each branch office must be
inspected at least every three years. The proposed subject matter
requirements for inspection reports are substantially the same as the
current subject matter requirements.
Proposed Rule 3110(d)
    Section 15(g) of the Act, adopted as part of the Insider Trading
and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of 1988,\16\ requires every
registered broker or dealer to establish, maintain, and enforce written
policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent the misuse of
material, non-public information by the broker or dealer or any
associated person of the broker or dealer.\17\ Current Rule 342.21 sets
forth specific supervisory procedures for compliance with Section 15(g)
by requiring firms to review trades in Exchange-listed securities and
related financial instruments that are effected for the member
organization's account or for the accounts of the member organization's
employees and family members. Current Rule 342.21 also requires member
organizations to promptly conduct an internal investigation into any
trade the firm identifies that may have violated insider trading laws
or rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \16\ See Insider Trading and Securities Fraud Enforcement Act of
1988, Public Law No. 100-704, 102 Stat. 4677.
    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78o(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Proposed Rule 3110(d) incorporates provisions of current Rule
342.21, with some modifications, and extends the requirement beyond
Exchange-listed securities and related financial instruments to cover
all securities. Proposed Rule 3110(d) would cover transaction reviews
and investigations. Proposed Rule 3110(d)(1) would require each member
organization to include in its supervisory procedures a process for the
review of securities transactions reasonably designed to identify
trades that may violate the provisions of the Act, the rules
thereunder, or Exchange rules prohibiting insider trading and
manipulative and deceptive devices that are effected for the:
     Accounts of the member organization;
     Accounts introduced or carried by the member organization
in which a person associated with the member organization has a
beneficial interest or the authority to make investment decisions;
     Accounts of a person associated with the member
organization that are disclosed to the member organization pursuant to
Rule 407 or NASD Rule 3050, as applicable; and
     Covered accounts.
    Under proposed Rule 3110(d)(2), each member organization would be
required to promptly conduct an internal investigation into any such
trade to determine whether a violation of those laws or rules has
occurred. In addition, under proposed Rule 3110(d)(3), a member
organization engaging in investment banking services would be required
to file written reports with the Exchange, signed by a senior officer
of the member organization, at such times and, without limitation,
including such content, as follows:
     Within ten business days of the end of each calendar
quarter, a written report describing each internal investigation
initiated in the previous calendar quarter pursuant to proposed Rule
3110(d)(2), including the identity of the member organization, the date
each internal investigation commenced, the status of each open internal
investigation, the resolution of any internal investigation reached
during the previous calendar quarter, and, with respect to each
internal investigation, the identity of the security, trades, accounts,
associated persons of the member organization, or associated person of
the member organization's family members holding a covered account,
under review, and that includes a copy of the member organization's
policies and procedures required by proposed Rule 3110(d)(1).
     Within five business days of completion of an internal
investigation pursuant to proposed Rule 3110(d)(2) in which it was
determined that a violation of the provisions of the Act, the rules
thereunder, or Exchange rules prohibiting insider trading and
manipulative and deceptive devices had occurred, a written report
detailing the completion of the investigation, including the results of
the investigation, any internal disciplinary action taken, and any
referral of the matter to the Exchange, another SRO, the SEC, or any
other federal, state, or international regulatory authority.
    For purposes of proposed Rule 3110(d)(4), the following definitions
would apply:
     The term ``covered account'' would include any account
introduced or carried by the member organization that is held by:
     The spouse of a person associated with the member
organization;
     A child of the person associated with the member
organization or such person's spouse, provided that the child resides
in the same household as, or is financially dependent upon, the person
associated with the member organization;
     Any other related individual over whose account the person
associated with the member organization has control; or
     Any other individual over whose account the associated
person of the member organization has control and to whose financial
support such person materially contributes.
     The term ``investment banking services'' would include,
without limitation, acting as an underwriter, participating in a
selling group in an offering for the issuer, or otherwise acting in
furtherance of a public offering of the issuer; acting as a financial
adviser in a merger or acquisition; providing venture capital or equity
lines of credit or serving as placement agent for the issuer or
otherwise acting in

furtherance of a private offering of the issuer.
Proposed Rule 3110(e)
    Proposed Rule 3110(e) would define ``OSJ'' and ``branch office.''
As noted above, ``OSJ'' would be a new designation for the Exchange and
the definition of the term would substantially mirror FINRA's
definition. The term ``OSJ'' would mean any office of a member
organization at which any one or more of the following functions take
place:
     Order execution or market making;
     Structuring of public offerings or private placements;
     Maintaining custody of customers' funds or securities;
     Final acceptance (approval) of new accounts on behalf of
the member organization;
     Review and endorsement of customer orders;
     Final approval of retail communications for use by persons
associated with the member organization, pursuant to Rule 2210(b)(1),
except for an office that solely conducts final approval of research
reports; or
     Responsibility for supervising the activities of persons
associated with the member organization at one or more other branch
offices of the member organization.

The definition of ``branch office'' would be substantially the same as
current Rule 342.10. It would mean any location where one or more
associated persons of a member organization regularly conducts the
business of effecting any transactions in, or inducing or attempting to
induce the purchase or sale of, any security, or is held out as such,
excluding:
     Any location that is established solely for customer
service or back office type functions where no sales activities are
conducted and that is not held out to the public as a branch office;
     Any location that is the associated person's primary
residence, provided that:
     Only one associated person, or multiple associated persons
who reside at that location and are members of the same immediate
family, conduct business at the location;
     The location is not held out to the public as an office
and the associated person does not meet with customers at the location;
     Neither customer funds nor securities are handled at that
location;
     The associated person is assigned to a designated branch
office, and such designated branch office is reflected on all business
cards, stationery, retail communications and other communications to
the public by such associated person;
     The associated person's correspondence and communications
with the public are subject to the firm's supervision in accordance
with proposed Rule 3110;
     Electronic communications (e.g., email) are made through
the member organization's electronic system;
     All orders are entered through the designated branch
office or an electronic system established by the member organization
that is reviewable at the branch office;
     Written supervisory procedures pertaining to supervision
of sales activities conducted at the residence are maintained by the
member organization; and
     A list of the residence locations is maintained by the
member organization.
     Any location, other than a primary residence, that is used
for securities business for less than 30 business days \18\ in any one
calendar year, provided the member organization complies with the first
eight of the nine immediately preceding bullet points;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ The term ``business day'' would not include any partial
business day provided that the associated person spends at least
four hours on such business day at his or her designated branch
office during the hours that such office is normally open for
business.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Any office of convenience, where associated persons
occasionally and exclusively by appointment meet with customers, which
is not held out to the public as an office; \19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ Where such office of convenience is located on bank
premises, signage necessary to comply with applicable federal and
state laws, rules and regulations and applicable rules and
regulations of other SROs, and securities and banking regulators
could be displayed and would not be deemed ``holding out'' for
purposes of this section.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Any location that is used primarily to engage in non-
securities activities and from which the associated person(s) effects
no more than 25 securities transactions in any one calendar year;
provided that any retail communication identifying such location also
sets forth the address and telephone number of the location from which
the associated person(s) conducting business at the non-branch
locations are directly supervised;
     The floor of a registered national securities exchange
where a member organization conducts a direct access business with
public customers; or
     A temporary location established in response to the
implementation of a business continuity plan.
    Notwithstanding the exclusions for branch offices described above,
any location that is responsible for supervising the activities of
persons associated with the member organization at one or more non-
branch locations of the member organization would be considered a
branch office.
Proposed Supplementary Materials to Proposed Rule 3110
    Proposed Supplementary Material .01 to Rule 3110 would require a
member organization's main office location to be registered and
designated as a branch office or OSJ if it meets the definitions of a
``branch office'' or ``office of supervisory jurisdiction'' as set
forth in proposed Rule 3110(e). In general, the nature of activities
conducted at a main office will satisfy the requirements of such terms.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .02 to Rule 3110 would provide
that, in addition to the locations that meet the definition of OSJ in
proposed Rule 3110(e), each member organization must also register and
designate other offices as OSJs as is necessary to supervise its
associated persons in accordance with the standards set forth in
proposed Rule 3110. In making a determination as to whether to
designate a location as an OSJ, the member organization should consider
the following factors:
     Whether registered persons at the location engage in
retail sales or other activities involving regular contact with public
customers;
     Whether a substantial number of registered persons conduct
securities activities at, or are otherwise supervised from, such
location;
     Whether the location is geographically distant from
another OSJ of the firm;
     Whether the member organization's registered persons are
geographically dispersed; and
     Whether the securities activities at such location are
diverse or complex.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .03 to Rule 3110 would provide
additional guidance relating to proposed Rule 3110(a)(4), which would
require a member organization to designate one or more appropriately
registered principals in each OSJ with the authority to carry out the
supervisory responsibilities assigned to that office (``on-site
principal''). The proposed Supplementary Material would provide that
the designated on-site principal for each OSJ must have a physical
presence, on a regular and routine basis, at each OSJ for which the
principal has supervisory responsibilities. Consequently, there is a
general presumption that a principal will not be designated and
assigned to be the on-site principal pursuant to proposed Rule
3110(a)(4) to supervise more than one

OSJ. If a member organization determines it is necessary to designate
and assign one appropriately registered principal to be the on-site
principal pursuant to proposed Rule 3110(a)(4) to supervise two or more
OSJs, the member organization must take into consideration, among
others, the following factors:
     Whether the on-site principal is qualified by virtue of
experience and training to supervise the activities and associated
persons in each location;
     Whether the on-site principal has the capacity and time to
supervise the activities and associated persons in each location;
     Whether the on-site principal is a producing registered
representative;
     Whether the OSJ locations are in sufficiently close
proximity to ensure that the on-site principal is physically present at
each location on a regular and routine basis; and
     The nature of activities at each location, including size
and number of associated persons, scope of business activities, nature
and complexity of the products and services offered, volume of business
done, the disciplinary history of persons assigned to such locations,
and any other indicators of irregularities or misconduct.
    The proposed Supplementary Material would provide that a member
organization must establish, maintain, and enforce written supervisory
procedures regarding the supervision of all OSJs. In all cases where a
member organization designates and assigns one on-site principal to
supervise more than one OSJ, the member organization must document in
the member organization's written supervisory and inspection procedures
the factors used to determine why the member organization considers
such supervisory structure to be reasonable and the determination by
the member organization will be subject to scrutiny.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .04 to Rule 3110 would provide that
a member organization is not required to conduct in-person meetings
with each registered person or group of registered persons to comply
with the annual compliance meeting (or interview) required by proposed
Rule 3110(a)(7). A member organization that chooses to conduct
compliance meetings using other methods (e.g., on-demand webcast or
course, video conference, interactive classroom setting, telephone, or
other electronic means) must ensure, at a minimum, that each registered
person attends the entire meeting (e.g., an on-demand annual compliance
webcast would require each registered person to use a unique user ID
and password to gain access and use a technology platform to track the
time spent on the webcast, provide click-as-you go confirmation, and
have an attestation of completion at the end of a webcast) and is able
to ask questions regarding the presentation and receive answers in a
timely fashion (e.g., an on-demand annual compliance webcast that
allows registered persons to ask questions via an email to a presenter
or a centralized address or via a telephone hotline and receive timely
responses directly or view such responses on the member organization's
intranet site).
    Proposed Supplementary Material .05 to Rule 3110 would provide that
a member organization may use a risk-based review system to comply with
proposed Rule 3110(b)(2)'s requirement that a registered principal
review all transactions relating to the investment banking or
securities business of the member organization. A member organization
would not be required to conduct detailed reviews of each transaction
if it is using a reasonably designed risk-based review system that
provides it with sufficient information to permit it to focus on the
areas that pose the greatest numbers and risks of violation.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .06 to Rule 3110 would provide
that, by employing risk-based principles, a member organization must
decide the extent to which additional policies and procedures for the
review of:
     Incoming and outgoing written (including electronic)
correspondence that fall outside of the subject matters listed in
proposed Rule 3110(b)(4) are necessary for its business and structure.
If a member organization's procedures do not require that all
correspondence be reviewed before use or distribution, the procedures
must provide for:
     The education and training of associated persons regarding
the firm's procedures governing correspondence;
     The documentation of such education and training; and
     Surveillance and follow-up to ensure that such procedures
are implemented and followed.
     Internal communications that are not of a subject matter
that require review under Exchange rules and federal securities laws
are necessary for its business and structure.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .07 to Rule 3110 would provide that
the evidence of review required in proposed Rule 3110(b)(4) must be
chronicled either electronically or on paper and must clearly identify
the reviewer, the internal communication or correspondence that was
reviewed, the date of review, and the actions taken by the member
organization as a result of any significant regulatory issues
identified during the review. Merely opening a communication would not
be sufficient review.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .08 to Rule 3110 would provide
that, in the course of the supervision and review of correspondence and
internal communications required by proposed Rule 3110(b)(4), a
supervisor/principal may delegate certain functions to persons who need
not be registered. However, the supervisor/principal would remain
ultimately responsible for the performance of all necessary supervisory
reviews, irrespective of whether he or she delegates functions related
to the review. Accordingly, supervisors/principals must take reasonable
and appropriate action to ensure delegated functions are properly
executed and should evidence performance of their procedures
sufficiently to demonstrate overall supervisory control.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .09 to Rule 3110 would provide that
each member organization must retain the internal communications and
correspondence of associated persons relating to the member
organization's investment banking or securities business for the period
of time and accessibility specified in Rule 17a-4(b) under the Act. The
names of the persons who prepared outgoing correspondence and who
reviewed the correspondence must be ascertainable from the retained
records, and the retained records must be readily available to the
Exchange, upon request.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .10 to Rule 3110 would provide that
a member organization's determination that it is not possible to comply
with proposed Rules 3110(b)(6)(C)(i) or (b)(6)(C)(ii) prohibiting
supervisory personnel from supervising their own activities and from
reporting to, or otherwise having compensation or continued employment
determined by, a person or persons they are supervising generally will
arise in instances where:
     The member organization is a sole proprietor in a single-
person firm;
     A registered person is the member organization's most
senior executive officer (or similar position); or
     A registered person is one of several of the member
organization's most senior executive officers (or similar positions).
    Proposed Supplementary Material .11 to Rule 3110 would provide that
a member organization may use electronic media to satisfy its
obligation to communicate its written supervisory procedures, and any
amendment

thereto, pursuant to proposed Rule 3110(b)(7), provided that:
     The written supervisory procedures have been promptly
communicated to, and are readily accessible by, all associated persons
to whom such supervisory procedures apply based on their activities and
responsibilities through, for example, the member organization's
intranet system;
     All amendments to the written supervisory procedures are
promptly posted to the member organization's electronic media;
     Associated persons are notified that amendments relevant
to their activities and responsibilities have been made to the written
supervisory procedures;
     The member organization has reasonable procedures to
monitor and maintain the security of the material posted to ensure that
it cannot be altered by unauthorized persons; and
     The member organization retains current and prior versions
of its written supervisory procedures in compliance with the applicable
record retention requirements of Rule 17a-4(e)(7) under the Act.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .12 to Rule 3110 would provide
that, in fulfilling its obligations under proposed Rule 3110(c), each
member organization must conduct a review, at least annually, of the
businesses in which it engages. The review must be reasonably designed
to assist in detecting and preventing violations of and achieving
compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations and with
Exchange rules. Each member organization must establish and maintain
supervisory procedures that must take into consideration, among other
things, the firm's size, organizational structure, scope of business
activities, number and location of the firm's offices, the nature and
complexity of the products and services offered by the firm, the volume
of business done, the number of associated persons assigned to a
location, the disciplinary history of registered representatives or
associated persons, and any indicators of irregularities or misconduct
(i.e., ``red flags''), etc. The procedures established and reviews
conducted must provide that the quality of supervision at remote
locations is sufficient to ensure compliance with applicable securities
laws and regulations and with Exchange rules. A member organization
must be especially diligent in establishing procedures and conducting
reasonable reviews with respect to a non-branch location where a
registered representative engages in securities activities. Based on
the factors outlined above, member organizations may need to impose
reasonably designed supervisory procedures for certain locations or may
need to provide for more frequent reviews of certain locations.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .13 to Rule 3110 would provide
additional guidance to proposed Rule 3110(c)(1)(C), which would require
a member organization to inspect on a regular periodic schedule every
non-branch location. In establishing a non-branch location inspection
schedule, there is a general presumption that a non-branch location
will be inspected at least every three years, even in the absence of
any indicators of irregularities or misconduct (i.e., ``red flags'').
If a member organization establishes a longer periodic inspection
schedule, the member organization must document in its written
supervisory and inspection procedures the factors used in determining
that a longer periodic inspection cycle is appropriate.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .14 to Rule 3110 would provide that
a member organization's determination that it is not possible to comply
with proposed Rule 3110(c)(3)(B) with respect to who is not allowed to
conduct a location's inspection will generally arise in instances
where:
     The member organization has only one office; or
     The member organization has a business model where small
or single-person offices report directly to an OSJ manager who is also
considered the offices' branch office manager.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .15 to Rule 3110 would provide a
definition for ``associated person'' for the purposes of proposed Rule
3110.
Proposed Rule 3120 (Supervisory Control System)
    Proposed Rule 3120(a), which is based on FINRA Rule 3120(a), would
provide that each member organization must designate and specifically
identify to the Exchange one or more principals who must establish,
maintain, and enforce a system of supervisory control policies and
procedures that:
     Test and verify that the member organization's supervisory
procedures are reasonably designed with respect to the activities of
the member organization and its associated persons, to achieve
compliance with applicable securities laws and regulations, and with
applicable Exchange rules; and
     Create additional or amend supervisory procedures where
the need is identified by such testing and verification.

Similar to the requirements of current Rule 342.30, the designated
principal or principals would be required to submit to the member
organization's senior management no less than annually, a report
detailing each member organization's system of supervisory controls,
the summary of the test results and significant identified exceptions,
and any additional or amended supervisory procedures created in
response to the test results.
    Proposed Rule 3120(b) would provide that each report provided to
senior management pursuant to proposed Rule 3120(a) in the calendar
year following a calendar year in which a member organization reported
$200 million or more in gross revenue must include, to the extent
applicable to the member organization's business:
     A tabulation of the reports pertaining to customer
complaints and internal investigations made to the Exchange during the
preceding year; and
     Discussion of the preceding year's compliance efforts,
including procedures and educational programs, in each of the following
areas:
     Trading and market activities;
     Investment banking activities;
     Antifraud and sales practices;
     Finance and operations;
     Supervision; and
     Anti-money laundering.

The categories listed above are incorporated from the annual report
content requirements of current Rule 342.30, which apply to all member
organizations regardless of revenue. The proposed rule change seeks to
mitigate compliance costs and burdens with respect to proposed Rule
3120's annual reporting requirements by requiring that only member
organizations reporting $200 million or more in gross revenues in the
preceding year include in their annual reports supplemental information
from current Rule 342.30's annual report content requirements. The
Exchange also believes that the proposed threshold strikes the
appropriate balance as it encompasses larger member organizations,
member organizations engaged in significant underwriting activities and
substantial trading activities or market making business, and member
organizations with extensive sales platforms.
    Proposed Rule 3120(c) would provide that, for purposes of proposed
Rule 3120(b), ``gross revenue'' is defined as:
     Total revenue as reported on FOCUS Form Part II or IIA
(line item 4030) less commodities revenue (line item 3990), if
applicable; or
     Total revenue as reported on FOCUS Form Part II CSE (line
item 4030) less, if applicable,

     Commissions on commodity transactions (line item 3991);
and
     Commodities gains or losses (line items 3924 and 3904).
    Proposed Supplementary Material .01 to Rule 3120 would provide a
definition for ``associated person'' for the purposes of proposed Rule
3120.
Proposed Rule 3150 (Holding of Customer Mail)
    Proposed Rule 3150(a) would provide that a member organization may
hold mail for a customer who will not be receiving mail at his or her
usual address, provided that:
     The member organization receives written instructions from
the customer that include the time period during which the member
organization is requested to hold the customer's mail. If the requested
time period included in the instructions is longer than three
consecutive months (including any aggregation of time periods from
prior requests), the customer's instructions must include an acceptable
reason for the request (e.g., safety or security concerns). Convenience
is not an acceptable reason for holding mail longer than three months;
     The member organization:
     Informs the customer in writing of any alternate methods,
such as email or access through the member organization's Web site,
that the customer may use to receive or monitor account activity and
information; and
     Obtains the customer's confirmation of the receipt of such
information; and
     The member organization verifies at reasonable intervals
that the customer's instructions still apply.
    Proposed Rule 3150(b) would provide that, during the time that a
member organization is holding mail for a customer, the member
organization must be able to communicate with the customer in a timely
manner to provide important account information (e.g., privacy notices
and the Securities Investor Protection Corporation information
disclosures required by Rule 2266), as necessary.
    Proposed Rule 3150(c) would provide that a member organization
holding a customer's mail pursuant to proposed Rule 3150 must take
actions reasonably designed to ensure that the customer's mail is not
tampered with, held without the customer's consent, or used by an
associated person of the member organization in any manner that would
violate Exchange rules or the federal securities laws.
    The Exchange currently does not have a rule comparable to proposed
Rule 3150. The Exchange believes that adding proposed Rule 3150 would
help protect customers.
    Proposed Supplementary Material .01 to Rule 3150 would provide a
definition for ``associated person'' for the purposes of proposed Rule
3150.
Proposed Rule 3170 (Tape Recording of Registered Persons by Certain
Firms)
    Proposed Rule 3170(a) would provide the following definitions for
purposes of proposed Rule 3170:
     The term ``registered person'' would mean any person
registered with the Exchange.
     The term ``disciplined firm'' would mean:
     A member organization that, in connection with sales
practices involving the offer, purchase, or sale of any security, has
been expelled from membership or participation in any securities
industry SRO or is subject to an order of the SEC revoking its
registration as a broker-dealer;
     A futures commission merchant or introducing broker that
has been formally charged by either the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission or a registered futures association with deceptive
telemarketing practices or promotional material relating to security
futures, those charges have been resolved, and the futures commission
merchant or introducing broker has been closed down and permanently
barred from the futures industry as a result of those charges; or
     A futures commission merchant or introducing broker that,
in connection with sales practices involving the offer, purchase, or
sale of security futures is subject to an order of the SEC revoking its
registration as a broker or dealer.
     The term ``disciplinary history'' would mean a finding of
a violation by a registered person in the past five years by the SEC,
an SRO, or a foreign financial regulatory authority of one or more of
the following provisions (or comparable foreign provision) or rules or
regulations thereunder:
     Violations of the types enumerated in Section 15(b)(4)(E)
of the Act;
     Section 15(c) of the Act;
     Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933;
     Rules 10b-5 and 15g-1 through 15g-9 under the Act;
     NASD Rule 2110 (Standards of Commercial Honor and
Principles of Trade) or FINRA Rule 2010 (Standards of Commercial Honor
and Principles of Trade) or NYSE Rule 2010 (Standards of Commercial
Honor and Principles of Trade) or NYSE Rule 476(a)(6) (Failure to
Observe High Standards of Commercial Honor and Just and Equitable
Principles of Trade) (only if the finding of a violation of NASD Rule
2110, FINRA Rule 2010, NYSE Rule 2010 or NYSE Rule 476(a)(6) is for
unauthorized trading, churning, conversion, material misrepresentations
or omissions to a customer, front-running, trading ahead of research
reports or excessive markups), FINRA Rule 5280 (Trading Ahead of
Research Reports), NASD Rule 2120 (Use of Manipulative, Deceptive or
Other Fraudulent Devices) or FINRA Rule 2020 (Use of Manipulative,
Deceptive or Other Fraudulent Devices) or NYSE Rule 2020 (Use of
Manipulative, Deceptive or Other Fraudulent Devices) or NYSE Rule
476(a)(5) (effecting any transaction in, or inducing the purchase or
sale of, any security by means of any manipulative, deceptive or other
fraudulent device or contrivance), NASD Rule 2310 (Recommendations to
Customers (Suitability)) or FINRA Rule 2111 (Suitability) or NYSE Rule
405 (Diligence as to Accounts), NASD Rule 2330 (Customers' Securities
or Funds) or FINRA Rule 2150 (Improper Use of Customers' Securities or
Funds; Prohibition Against Guarantees and Sharing in Accounts) or NYSE
Rule 2150 (Improper Use of Customers' Securities or Funds; Prohibition
Against Guarantees and Sharing in Accounts), NASD Rule 2440 (Fair
Prices and Commissions), NASD Rule 3010 (Supervision) or FINRA Rule
3110 (Supervision) or NYSE Rule 3110 (Supervision) or NYSE Rule 342
(Offices--Approval, Supervision and Control) (failure to supervise only
for both NASD Rule 3010, FINRA Rule 3110, NYSE Rule 3110 or Rule 342),
NASD Rule 3310 (Publication of Transactions and Quotations) or FINRA
Rule 5210 (Publication of Transactions and Quotations) or NYSE Rule
5210 (Publication of Transactions and Quotations), and NASD Rule 3330
(Payment Designed to Influence Market Prices, Other than Paid
Advertising) or FINRA Rule 5230 (Payments Involving Publications that
Influence the Market Price of a Security); and MSRB Rules G-19, G-30,
and G-37(b) & (c).
     The term ``tape recording'' would include without
limitation, any electronic or digital recording that meets the
requirements of proposed Rule 3170.
     The term ``taping firm'' would mean:
     A member organization with at least five but fewer than
ten registered persons, where 40% or more of its registered persons
have been associated with one or more disciplined firms in a registered
capacity within the last three years;

     A member organization with at least ten but fewer than
twenty registered persons, where four or more of its registered persons
have been associated with one or more disciplined firms in a registered
capacity within the last three years;
     A member organization with at least twenty registered
persons where 20% or more of its registered persons have been
associated with one or more disciplined firms in a registered capacity
within the last three years.
     For purposes of calculating the number of registered
persons who have been associated with one or more disciplined firms in
a registered capacity within the last three years pursuant to proposed
Rule 3170(a)(5), member organizations should not include registered
persons who:
     Have been registered for an aggregate total of 90 days or
less with one or more disciplined firms within the past three years;
and
     Do not have a disciplinary history.
    Proposed Rule 3170(b) would provide that each member organization
that either is notified by the Exchange or otherwise has actual
knowledge that it is a taping firm must establish, maintain, and
enforce special written procedures for supervising the telemarketing
activities of all of its registered persons. A taping firm required to
establish, maintain, and enforce special written procedures pursuant to
proposed Rule 3170(b) would be required to establish and implement the
procedures within 60 days of receiving notice from the Exchange or
obtaining actual knowledge that it is a taping firm. The procedures
required by proposed Rule 3170(b) would include procedures for tape
recording all telephone conversations between the taping firm's
registered persons and both existing and potential customers and for
reviewing the tape recordings to ensure compliance with applicable
securities laws and regulations and applicable Exchange rules. The
procedures must be appropriate for the taping firm's business, size,
structure, and customers, and must be maintained for a period of three
years from the date that the taping firm establishes and implements the
procedures. All tape recordings made pursuant to the requirements of
proposed Rule 3170(b) must be retained for a period of not less than
three years from the date the tape was created, the first two years in
an easily accessible place. Each taping firm would be required to
catalog the retained tapes by registered person and date. By the 30th
day of the month following the end of each calendar quarter, each
taping firm subject to the requirements of proposed Rule 3170(b) would
be required to submit to the Exchange a report on the taping firm's
supervision of the telemarketing activities of its registered persons.
    Proposed Rule 3170(c) would provide that a member organization that
becomes a taping firm for the first time may reduce its staffing levels
to fall below the threshold levels within 30 days after receiving
notice from the Exchange pursuant to the provisions of proposed Rule
3170(b)(1) or obtaining actual knowledge that it is a taping firm,
provided the member organization promptly notifies the Exchange's
Department of Member Regulation in writing of its becoming subject to
the Rule. Once the member organization has reduced its staffing levels
to fall below the threshold levels, it must not rehire a person
terminated to accomplish the staff reduction for a period of 180 days.
On or prior to reducing staffing levels pursuant to proposed Rule
3170(c), a member organization would be required to provide the
Exchange's Department of Member Regulation with written notice
identifying the terminated person(s).
    Proposed Rule 3170(d) would provide that, pursuant to the Rule 9600
Series, the Exchange could, in exceptional circumstances, taking into
consideration all relevant factors, exempt any taping firm
unconditionally or on specified terms and conditions from the
requirements of proposed Rule 3170. A taping firm seeking an exemption
would be required to file a written application pursuant to the Rule
9600 Series within 30 days after receiving notice from the Exchange or
obtaining actual knowledge that it is a taping firm. A member
organization that becomes a taping firm for the first time could elect
to reduce its staffing levels pursuant to the provisions of proposed
Rule 3170(c) or, alternatively, to seek an exemption pursuant to
proposed Rule 3170(d), as appropriate. A taping firm would not be able
to seek relief from proposed Rule 3170 by both reducing its staffing
levels pursuant to proposed Rule 3170(c) and requesting an exemption.
    The Exchange does not currently have a rule comparable to proposed
Rule 3170. The Exchange believes that adopting proposed Rule 3170 will
provide for more effective supervision of member organizations that
have a significant number of registered persons with disciplinary
history, thereby resulting is enhanced customer protection.
Conforming Changes
    The Exchange also proposes to make certain conforming changes to
Rules 36, 70, 86, 345, 405, 407, 408,\20\ 410, 416A, 472, 476A, 2210,
and 9217 to delete or update cross-references to the proposed rules as
applicable. The Exchange also proposes certain technical changes within
Rule 86 \21\ and 345.10 \22\ that are unrelated to this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \20\ The Exchange also proposes to replace ``allied member'' in
Rule 408 with ``principal executive.'' See note 11, supra.
    \21\ The Exchange proposes to update a reference to Rules 17a-3
and 17a-4 under the Act.
    \22\ The Exchange proposes to delete a reference to ``registered
options representative.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\23\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\24\ in particular, because it
is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade and to
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system. Specifically, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change supports the objectives of the
Act by providing greater harmonization between Exchange rules and FINRA
rules of similar purpose, resulting in less burdensome and more
efficient regulatory compliance. In particular, Exchange member
organizations that are also FINRA members are subject to Exchange
supervisory rules and FINRA Rules 3110, 3120, 3150, and 3170, and
harmonizing these rules by adopting proposed Rules 3110, 3120, 3150,
and 3170 would promote just and equitable principles of trade by
requiring a single standard for supervision. The Exchange believes that
to the extent the Exchange has proposed changes that differ from the
FINRA version of the Exchange rules, such changes are generally
technical in nature and do not change the substance of the proposed
rules. The Exchange also believes that the proposed rule change will
update and add specificity to the requirements governing supervision,
which will promote just and equitable principles of trade and help to
protect investors. As such the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change meets the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \24\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The

Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues but rather to achieve greater consistency
between the Exchange's rules and FINRA's rules concerning supervision.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action

    The Exchange has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \25\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\26\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \26\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \27\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b4(f)(6)(iii),\28\ the Commission
may designate a shorter period of time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that
the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \27\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
    \28\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission believes that waiving the 30-day operative delay is
consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest,
because it allows the Exchange to immediately conform its supervision
rules to corresponding FINRA rules. This will ensure that Dual Members
generally will be subject to a single set of rules governing
supervision. As noted by the Exchange, the proposal would harmonize
NYSE and FINRA rules, resulting in less burdensome and more efficient
regulatory compliance. In addition, the proposal will update and add
specificity to the Exchange's requirements governing supervision, which
will promote just and equitable principles of trade and help to protect
investors. For these reasons, the Commission designates the proposed
rule change to be operative upon filing.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \29\ For purposes of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the
Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \30\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \30\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2014-56 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields,
Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE.,
Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2014-56. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Section, 100 F Street
NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090, on official business days between the
hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing will also be
available for inspection and copying at the NYSE's principal office.
All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission
does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You
should submit only information that you wish to make available
publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2014-56
and should be submitted on or before December 4, 2014.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \31\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kevin M. O'Neill,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014-26815 Filed 11-12-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 139 (Friday, July 19, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 43197]
[FR Doc No: 2013-17285]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[ER13-1922-000; ER13-1929-000; ER13-1932-000; NJ13-11-000]

Duke Energy Florida, Inc.; Florida Power & Light Company; Tampa
Electric Company; Orlando Utilities Commission; Notice of Compliance
Filings

    Take notice that on July 10, 2013, Duke Energy Florida, Inc.,
Florida Power & Light Company, Tampa Electric Company, and Orlando
Utilities Commission, submitted filings to comply with the requirements
of Order No. 1000 Interregional Compliance.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Transmission Planning and Cost Allocation by Transmission
Owning and Operating Public Utilities, 136 FERC ] 61,051 (2011),
order on reh'g and clarification, 139 FERC ] 61,132 (2012) (Order
No. 1000-A), order on reh'g and clarification, 141 FERC ] 61,044
(2012) (Order No. 1000-B) (Order Nos. 1000, 1000-A, and 1000-B
collectively referred to as Order No. 1000, Order, or Final Rule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Any person desiring to intervene or to protest this filing must
file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211, 385.214). Protests will be
considered by the Commission in determining the appropriate action to
be taken, but will not serve to make protestants parties to the
proceeding. Any person wishing to become a party must file a notice of
intervention or motion to intervene, as appropriate. Such notices,
motions, or protests must be filed on or before the comment date. On or
before the comment date, it is not necessary to serve motions to
intervene or protests on persons other than the Applicant.
    The Commission encourages electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper using the ``eFiling'' link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an
original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.
    This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the
``eLibrary'' link and is available for review in the Commission's
Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ``eSubscription''
link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email
notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online service, please email
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>or call<PHONE_NUMBER> (toll free). For
TTY, call<PHONE_NUMBER>.
    Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on August 26, 2013.

    Dated: July 12, 2013.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2013-17285 Filed 7-18-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P