you have a copy of this. Please take out your schedule. Now, this schedule is absolutely tentative. It is for us to decide what to do at what time. So, we will move things around. Perhaps the only fixed things here are the three days, the tree breaks, the beginning time at 9 am and the closure time at 5.30 pm. Depending on our discussions, we will move the topics and discussions up and down. The one thing which is certain is that on the third day, that is on Friday, the additional topics and discussions after the lunch break are shifted to the morning session. We will reschedule cycle somewhere else, because out here, we will have a Moodle-based quiz and then the validity. So, for you to complete your registration formalities and for those who do not yet have a Moodle or have not yet logged in on Moodle, to complete the Moodle formalities, the break for T instead of 11, I will allow a break from 10.45. The T may still arrive at 11, but those 15 minutes may be used for completion of registration and completion of your Moodle logins for those who have not done it. Before we start, few questions to be answered by raising hands. How many of you were coordinators for last year's thermodynamics course? One, only one overlap, good. Where are you from? Anil Agrawal, from Jaipur Engineering College, Jaipur, Rajasthan. Jaipur Engineering College. College, Jaipur. Rajasthan. So, nice to have you back. Thank you. Was this doing, this again was by design or by accident? No, sir, for design only. Yes, any way, at least one person is common. The related question, how many of you were not coordinators, but participants in the earlier thermodynamics course? Okay, so there is a reasonable number of exposed people, but I am also happy that there is a large number of new people who have not been exposed to the thermodynamics earlier, either as coordinators or as participants. Then third question, how many of you have been either coordinators or participants in other courses which have been conducted under the NMEI CT scheme? For example, in mechanical engineering, we have conducted two more courses, one on heat transfer and one on fluid dynamics and CFD. But at the general level, we have conducted a teacher's workshop, a research methodology workshop and an Akash workshop. So, any one or more of these, how many were involved? Quite a good number. So, I think I will put it around how many have never attended or coordinated any NMEI CT one? That also is a good number. So, our catchment is slowly widening. That is a good thing. Now, let me start with a negative question. How many of you are not comfortable with the computer software called Moodle, use of Moodle? Not comfortable or have never used it? 1, 2, 3, 4, about 10, 15 percent. I am told that the quiz on the third day will be on Moodle. So, before that, at some time through the machine which is here, I will expose you generally about how that quiz will be conducted, how to login on Moodle and how to go about using Moodle. It is just if you have ever filled in a railway reservation form or an aircraft airplane, airway reservation form or any other transaction on the web, Moodle is no different. It is just a different format. It will be a question and there will be a number of options or a small text box for you to fill. Since this is the sort of a second implementation of thermodynamics, that is why I told Professor Fatah and since we are pressed for time, in IIT, Bombay also this is the semester and examination time. So, that is why you will find that we are unable to conduct this in a classroom environment. We are forced to conduct this in an auditorium type of environment because the classrooms are being used for examinations both morning and afternoon. So, we could not even find one full day for this workshop and because of this pressure and availability of space, we reduce this to three days and what I decided to do is in the those who have participated earlier would have noticed and on the NMEI site, NMEI city site the recordings are available. The coordinators workshop was a full, essentially a full lecture demonstration session over five days. Over three days if I do that, that will be doing too much in a hurry. So, what we will do is we will change this thing that we will have a discussion now about how to proceed, what to emphasize during this coordinators workshop and a set of discussions about how to manage the final workshop. There are certain subject related issues and there are certain implementation related issues and we better be very clear about it. For example, consider the first thing, last time when it was conducted, I had 34 coordinators sitting in front of me in a small room. I could almost by the second or third day, I could almost identify each one by face a few by names. You should excuse me because I have a very poor memory for faces and names. So, please identify yourself if you meet me now or later that I am so and so from this and from then we will discuss. Otherwise, I am likely to get totally confused with you know your number almost reaching crossing 150 and reaching slowly tending towards 200. Even in this session it will be difficult for me to individually talk to you in this three day work. And I am sure the questions and queries which come although I will take questions, I also have a parallel thing going on. Soon you will have with you slips like this. So, what we do in conferences, this is another possibility at any stage you have a question write down the general topic. Topic is just one or two words say first law, second law and things like that. If you want to identify your name that optional space is available for writing your name and then questions, queries, comments you write before that. In between sessions these things will be collected sorted. So, I will know which are the main queries for which I should be ready for discussion. That will save us even if it saves me 10 minutes and saves us 10 minutes per session over three days about hour, hour and a half would easily be saved. This is just a time saving measure that does not mean that if somebody raises a hand I am not going to, I am going to just neglect that. At some time I will pause and say what is the question and go ahead with it. And there will be volunteers here and one of your participants Dr. Mangesh Chaudhary has been our student here. I think you were my TA for a thermodynamics course at some time, some here. Which year was that? 2001, 12 years. But thermodynamics does not change in 10 or 12 years. But you will notice the differences the way we taught it that time and we are teaching it now. And I am also going to take his help to see this out and arrange them in topic order. Now let us get used to the packet which you have. Take it out. The first thing you should note is the form permission to use the course lecture workshop material in open source. I hope you have filled up this form during the registration process. If not you must fill this up and provide it at the registration desk. That is the first announcement. Now you will also have a schedule that is just to see to it that you get it in sharp focus. The focus here may not be that good. Then there are two more stapled bunches of paper, a thin one and a thick one. The thin one says sequence of topics. And after this was printed, there was a change of date. So the first thing you should do is change the dates 12 December to 012, 22 December to 012, to 11 December to 21 December. Because it was only day before yesterday that because of some logistic reasons and other comfort levels. We made it 11 to 21 and remember that 11 December is a Tuesday. 21 December is a Friday. So we will have Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, Saturday as the first five day session. Sunday will be off and then Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, Friday. With this we could have two five day sessions with the intervening day being Sunday which has a higher comfort level. And also the last day is a Friday followed by a two day weekend. So it is comfortable for you to travel back or go to any other place that you feel like. You will also notice that this is a draft for discussion. So as we proceed we will first thing is if by default we would like to proceed in the way this scheme is laid out in front of you and we will come to that discussion. And one of the things which we have to do during these three days is to decide which ones of these should we emphasize, which ones of these should we deemphasize. Because for this three day workshop as in the final ten day workshop the main constraint is time. Within that time we have to do justice to admins of engineering thermodynamics as possible. So this is one. The next one is it slightly thicker set. This is not a complete set. Let me make it clear. But to begin with these are the set of exercises which we will be using. And the first correction this will be made in the final versions after this workshop. Bottom line make it December 11 to 21. And when I say this is incomplete you will notice that if you compare the topics in the scheme topic 13 is introduction to cycles. On the last page we have 14, 15, 16, 17 the proposed additional topics. But the exercises pertaining to those have not yet been included here. We may include one or more of the additional topics 14 to 17 in this workshop. And I have delegated the responsibility of handling those topics if included to my two colleagues, Professors Van Darker and Purani. But because of their academic things they could not prepare a set of formal set of exercises. Whatever topics are included appropriate set of about a dozen exercises on each topic will be included in the final set of exercises. Let me also tell you that I had set out a questionnaire to participants in the previous course on thermodynamics where the structure was very similar. In fact essentially the same scheme of topics. Essentially the same set of exercises but some exercises are modified. I have in the last year and a half whatever new exercises or new problems I have set for quizzes in semester examinations they have been included in this or some of them have been included in this. So what I had done was on through Moodle for last time's main workshop I had set out a questionnaire asking for feedback. There were some 800 participants but the feedback was provided by just 40 of them till early today morning. So one thing we are going to do is look at that feedback and then start our discussion. The structure of this particular three day workshop will be like this. Looking at the feedback and after some initial discussion we will decide whether this set of topics is the proper set of topics. Emphasis we will decide as we go. The second thing is we will decide how to implement things in the final workshop. I want to discuss mainly the following. One is interaction, second one is exercises, and the third one is post workshop assignment. So the first exercise for you is to browse through this set of topics and at the end of those four or five minutes I would like to receive comments about whether this is the reasonably proper and reasonably complete set of topics which we should cover. I would specifically come to 14, 15, 16, 17 later but our first discussion would be based on the, will be regarding the first 13 topics, few minutes. I suppose we have had time for going through. So go back to the scheme of things which you teach at your place. This may be slightly different. May be in order, in our scheme of things right from 1 to 12 are taught in a course called just thermodynamics. Earlier it was called basic thermodynamics and in another course called applied thermodynamics we have 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 not 17, 13, 14, 15, 16 and some more topics. I understand that at many places the course in thermodynamics is split into two parts. One part the first half absolute basics are taught in a course called introduction to engineering or introduction to mechanical engineering. The second part which is taught only to mechanical engineers comes sometimes in the second year and may have a slightly different name. So whether it is taught in one shot or in two shot I first want to have your opinion as to whether 1 to 12 or 1 to 13 constitute a reasonably complete set of topics for thermodynamics. Yes or no? Anybody has a vehement objection to this scheme of things? Yes sir. Specifically they are not included here but when we come to first law open systems a reasonable number of unsteady professor. There is no special topic in that. If it comes up we will handle unsteady so that we will take care of as we go because there is some historical reason why we teach thermodynamics in this particular way at IIT Bombay. There is a long history of that. The origins of the history I do not know but I was an undergraduate student here between 1968 and 75 and at that time it was a 5 year program after 12th as professor Fatuk said and in the first 2 and a half to some extent 3 years there was a lot of emphasis on physics, chemistry, mathematics, humanities and engineering skills like workshop, drawing. Of course from second year onwards applied engineering courses also began like applied mechanics, materials, circuits and so on. But I was exposed to very rigorous or I should not say I we were exposed to very rigorous thermodynamics in physics as well as in chemistry before we came to mechanical engineering thermodynamics. When around 80s early 80s the 5 year program was modified to a 4 year program because of the school curriculum modification to the 10 plus 2 plus 3 for general education and 10 plus 2 plus 4 for engineering education. It so happened that the emphasis on the physics, chemistry, math in the first 2 years had to be significantly reduced. Many departments in particular mechanical engineering department then decided that this is not a good idea because we depended on a good physics background in many subjects like mechanics, wind mechanics and thermodynamics. So it was decided that whatever was done by the physics department for us, for mathematics department for us we will do internally in our course. So when I learnt thermodynamics, significant basic thermodynamics I learnt in a physics course. It was called thermodynamics but was taught by a professor of physics in my case professor Blatka. When mechanical engineering department redesigned the 4 year course it was decided that that part which was taught by a physics professor will also be taught by our own teachers. And that is why you will find that this course starts where a physics thermodynamics course starts off and then goes into applications. That is why out here we have significant emphasis on the basic principles and basic understanding of the principles of thermodynamics and basic derivations from basic understanding a derivation based on the 3 laws of thermodynamics. That is the historical reason. I agree that at different places maybe even in IITs the emphasis will be different. The emphasis is another thing but the first thing I think I am happy that we agree that the first 12 topics essentially constitute our basic engineering thermodynamics. So far as the scheme in mechanical engineering is concerned. If you go to thermodynamics as applied to chemical engineering the way chemists learn it, chemical engineers learn it. Although the absolute basic principles are the same the applications and hence the way the whole thing is derived is different. Me and my colleagues and I think most of you have a background in mechanical engineering. So we would essentially remain in the mechanical engineering scheme of things so far as thermodynamics is concerned. Now the next thing which we have to discuss and let us spend some time on this is the emphasis. I had asked the following questions to participants in the earlier workshop. So I will tell you something about the feedback which I have received so that the discussion can proceed in that manner. See I had listed out these 13 topics which were covered in the last workshop on thermodynamics and I had asked the respondents to tell me whether that topic should be deleted one option, one extreme option. Second the topic should be de-emphasized that is spend less time on it. The third one do not change the emphasis on the topic keep it as it is. And the fourth one improve the emphasis put more time and effort on that topic. So it became a 13 column 4 row or 13 row 4 column matrix, 13 by 4 matrix and that is too much of a detail. So what I have done is I have said that I have combined the de-emphasize and delete comments together and I have combined keep the emphasis the same or improve it together considering the first two as a negative sort one way, the second two as the positive sort. So if you take topic one the they say the negative part and the positive part. The negative part is 26 people, positive is 15. Topic two is 14 to 21. Topic three is 8, 23. Topic four is problem solving, problem solving, problem solving 18, 26. I would encircle something which is significantly higher than the other. Topic five first law 9, 22. Topic six, zero law, temperature 12, 18. Topic seven, thermometer equations of states, properties of steam, 2020, no variation. Eight properties of fluids, steam tables, etcetera, 21, 19, again no significant change. Then second law 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20 was 10, 27. Property relations, 9, 27, 11 was open systems, 16, 17, 12. Combine first and second law, this is availability exergy and 17, 27. C disastrously offering Batcubин So, if you look at it only the first topics introduction and the last topic cycles, the comment was that look you may spend less time on it, whereas for all others they said keep the emphasis as it is or increase the emphasis. So, that is just the background and mind you this is a very small sample of just 40 people who were participants in the earlier one, that is history just gives a hint of what they thought processes perhaps where, but remember 40 out of 800 is again just 5 percent, small sample. And this is a new edition, this is a new set of people in the new set of participants much larger than 800 definitely. So, it is for us to decide over the 3 days how to allocate time in the main workshop, not in this workshop. In this workshop as professor Kulkarni said there are certain issues which you have not for many of you may not even have heard some nomenclature, some name, some terminology well it is my job to explain that completely. So shall I say that considering this at least to begin with let us go through the whole scheme of things and then we can decide what to do and whether to significantly reduce something or significantly increase the emphasis on something, but one thing I think I would recommend and I think all of you agree that in some way or the other all these things needs to be covered or uncovered during a course in Tamil Nadu. Yeah that is why I did not tell you the deletion, see there is a paucity of time, so although deletion is out of question because that would break the whole thing apart. Reducing time provided for a certain topic is something we may have to do because finally it is 10 days into 6 or 6 and a half hours a day, it is about 60-65 hours and sometime we will go in interactions. Now that brings me to another topic, so let me if I have brought it up, let me bring again it to the floor. Last time we had finally 31 centers for Tamil Nadu, each center typically had anywhere between 15 to 40 or 50 participants, the total participants I think was 840 or something. Because there were only 31 centers although some centers were more active in interaction, some centers were rather dormant or passive, I am sure I was able to interact with each and every center and with a reasonable amount of time. But even then that was possible when every day I provided almost the whole of the afternoon session for interaction, it started off with a problem solving session and the session started off with by saying that look we have learned so many things so far, now from the exercise sheet we are ready to tackle problems this up to this. So to start off with why do not you try this problem first, then this, then this, some three four I would specify and I would be available here, you start solving the problems if there are any questions, they will come and the questions started from there soon after lunch and ended up much beyond the closure time 5.30. Now one of my worries is and I want some suggestions from you is with 31 centers I was comfortable with interaction and that too by providing something like two and a half to three hours every day. We have Professor Puranik there who was part of the fluid mechanics course right and at that time I think you had 46 or 47 centers, okay 48 centers and I may jump the gun but I think I have overheard him saying that he is not sure they have interacted with all the 48 centers sometime or the other, am I right? So they felt a pressure saying with 48 centers it was rather difficult to satisfy each and every center. I have not looked at the feedback if any way they have but you know I have noted by overrearing their comments he and his colleague that and I noticed it because of 31 centers by giving two and a half to three hours a day I was reasonably satisfied and I think those who have participated earlier may comment on this they were also satisfied with the type of interaction we have had at that time. Where you, how many of you were participants, a reasonable number and the interaction was satisfactory right, okay. My colleague Professor Puranik who handled the fluid dynamics course along with Professor Prabhu he was not satisfied when the number of centers became 48 and I am sure they must also have provided a similar slot, similar set of slots for this. Now remember that today we have something like 170 of the prospective workshop coordinators here of centers. It is possible that for some reason a few centers may get deleted last time also it was of course the first thing so 34 became 31 but I would not be surprised if 170 essentially remain 170 because most of you have acted as a center for some course or the other. And because of the exposure of a large number of faculty members there will be a large number of participants also this time. So let us say that if not 170 at least 160 centers we will have. Now how do you manage the interaction with 160 centers with Professor Fartagath said that in the near future we will have just now we have simply a star and a planet right. A star is here and there are 170 planets, 170 centers. Now what is proposed is a tree type of a system the root will be here there will be 10 main branches and from the 10 main branches there will be you know small branches each 10 main nodal centers taking care of maybe 50 individual centers and in each individual centers there will be a few dozen or 50 or 100 participants. So any suggestion about how to handle this? So one way one possible way could be the way they used to and they still do on radio they collect request from almost everybody and when they play that particular song they say this song has been requested by this person that person from here and there. So we can collect questions offline and then during discussion session those questions can be discussed with mentioning okay this question has been raised or proposed by such and such center and then you can answer that question. Yes, so that you know the Fermat type of things something like that we will have to do but remember one difference is that when you want to hear a song well you want to hear it it is not because of something you felt like and it does not matter whether you hear that song now or maybe 10 minutes or 15 minutes later. In this case the questions are going to be based on what the teacher here said a few minutes ago yes but that day same the same day a few I should not say few minutes ago maybe few hours ago okay. So I think that is a good idea so I will talk to the software people maybe on moodle or somewhere we will have those queries coming in then maybe we should have a set of people editing that or collecting that just the way the electronic way of what I am trying to do now with those lips of paper given to you. In fact that I was trying just to see how to handle 170 here later on the 170 will be remote center here I can see 170 of you together at that time your 170 will be each one will be just a small blob here and with a flag going up for a color changing or a flashing indicating that somebody from there wants to talk to us. In fact I had asked in the feedback a question about a general question what do you want to say additionally many people have said with a larger number of centers please improve the interaction you more time for interaction there are a few people we say reduce the interaction it will be just more formal one way teaching I do not like the second one that well if it is more formal one way teaching I could have simply said that look my last time's video lectures are video recorded all I need to do is go through them edit them for any small mistakes here there maybe add something delete something based on some feedback and say look these lectures are available I do not even have to be there I could go to Timbukh too and the course will be just telecast here just the way when some program is telecast on the TV it might have been recorded some interviews with people have been telecast after they have expired that has happened we know it has happened at some time. So I do not want that I want that interaction to take place but then what do you think that interaction should be say all afternoon session should be interaction for most of the afternoon session should be interaction how many of you think because most of you have participated in some after the end of each topic so suppose we will have similar sessions let me go back to this. So let us say the second day in the morning session 9 to 11 we will have something the second law then shall I have the discussion in the 1130 to one session shall I schedule it like that. Is there any possibility that we can collect all questions may be by giving one hour or one and half hour and after that as a cream of the questions so if we start answering that can save time again can lead to particular. No but that what do I do in that one one and half hours what can easily be done in that one because each and every centre will be connected electronically to us because in the video stream of things there is an audio visual transfer both ways going on essentially one way but the second way also reverse is also possible there is also a chat window through that or through a moodle session parallelly can have another PC connected there to the internet and another PC connected here to the internet through the moodle questions can come and then assistants here can you know collate them and tell me at the end of the session during tea time or lunch time that is how the questions are essentially from on these particular topics but then what will happen is and it is possible that the same question may be asked or similar questions may be raised by maybe 15, 20 centres it has happened earlier it has happened that 10 centres have raised their hand I pick up one ask the question here the question make my comments may be take care of a supplementary and then when I go to the other question this is serve they sort of lower their hands because their queries have been answered so such things will be reduced when I have properly collected but from the centre point of view I will not be latching on to a particular centre so the you know the person to person contact which is felt when I latch on to a centre ask a question that will be reduced but I think with 170 centres if I have to complete a task within 10 days I think we will have to give up on some such things of course some interactions I will still have with the centre but just imagine I was doing a calculation that suppose I spend going to a centre listening to them and replying to them it takes say 5 minutes 6 minutes let us take 6 minutes so if I provide 1 hour I will be able to take care of 10 centres if there are 160 centres 170 centres 17 hours are required 17 hours means 3 full days and that too each centre being visited just once I am sure in that old thing with 31 centres I could visit I am sure many centres have been visited every second day or third day if not every day so I think this the personal person to person intensity will have to be reduced in this particular case and as a coordinator you have to appreciate that and let us during this 3 days and even later let us work out a methodology I will set it up most probably we will have a moodle window or a special which act window on which only the questions will be asked and I will have a set of assistants here we will see and collect the yes. Yes what I plan to do is I plan to quickly go through the scheme without much elaboration because I have reduced it to almost half the time see when I reduce it to 5 day to 3 day the first 1 hour or so introduction that cannot be the last day quiz and this so half a day goes there half a day goes here so I have reduced it by 50% so I would go quickly and try to complete okay so essentially we will follow the earlier scheme for the coordinators workshop but at a quick pace now there are two more things which I would like to discuss before if time permits I will have some questions from you this time I said that it is possible for us perhaps to include some additional topics if required but this additional topics definitely would mean deemphasizing if not deleting some of those 13 topics if you look up the candidates I cannot really delete this part but one candidate for significant deemphasis is the significant deemphasis or perhaps deletion is a cycle analysis that is one decision we will have to take one possible candidate is cycle analysis another thing which I think many of you are familiar and hence I would not deemphasize but pick up pace is here open system so once I get some time out of these maybe I should be or we should be able to include some additional topics now a question was which one of these additional which of these additional topics you would like to be you would like to see included so psychrometry essentially the thermodynamics part of psychrometry what is not included in psychrometry is part where you need significant input from heat and mass transfer for example although we will do basic psychrometry processes we will not be able to apply that to say air washers and cooling towers because that becomes really applied psychrometry we are going away from thermodynamics you need significant input from heat transfer and mass transfer the second one was combustion essentially we will do the thermodynamic part of combustion which is stoichiometry and calorimetric but not you know chemical equilibria or kinetics of combustion and all the third one is compressible flow and the fourth one was kinetic theory the response out of 40 was 28 wanted psychrometry to be included 24 wanted combustion to be included 29 wanted compressible flow to be included only 11 wanted kinetic theory to be included now considering that I think is it okay if I say no more kinetic theory discussion we will keep it away probably they are not exposed to kinetic theory. No but let me let me let me ask you in your scheme of thermodynamics I think most of you are in mechanical engineering or related very directly related branch at the undergraduate level is kinetic theory taught or is used is not taught now at all somewhere no right including kinetic theory for mechanical engineers okay so they have one so since we which is your university Bhopal the kinetic theory is included okay so we have so I will put a question mark there bandarkar is looking at me very keenly because he is the default teacher for kinetic theory we will we will take a call on this on the last day of this workshop. Since we at least say there is a microscopic approach this has an introduction I think this kinetic theory should be there I mean at least we should now make an effort to introduce back into the syllabus okay. What about compressible flow and psychrometry no we will see I agree all first three definitely may be kinetic theory is also something which at least at a basic level every mechanical engineering student should learn there is no doubt about it the question is are these going to be a part of a first course or a primary course on engineering thermodynamics for mechanical engineering okay and if so do we have enough time to study these during that 10 day workshop because you know finally there is a constraint on time and in that time we can go at say frontier male speed or Rajdhani express speed but then the absorption of US coordinators and the participants as participants you know doing too much in a short time the rate of absorption and finally the understanding will not be very significant maybe it is a good idea to reduce the number of topics likely but do excellent learning of those topics at the individual level there is enough time later to learn additional topics or additional subjects for the 10 days I think yes I have I am going to significantly de-emphasize cycles maybe at the end of this workshop we may say that we will not talk of cycles in that my point is the psychrometry and combustion compressible flow will all be taught in thermal engineering later okay so it is not necessary to cover it in the fundamental course in thermodynamics okay that is your this is for psychrometry and psychrometry, combustion and the compressible flow will be a full course so your thing is restrict to the first 13 topics okay and I would still support kinetic theory because normally it is not coming even afterwards so small amount of kinetic theory will be good okay sir my I agree with the two topics that were told by that sir compressible flow not necessary and combustion is also not necessary but in our JNTU and Antupoor syllabus we are having this psychrometric process so we can discuss there for that 10 day workshop. So let us have an open discussion panel I get a feeling that there sufficient interest at least to begin with in the first three topics definitely and also in kinetic theory so may I propose that on the last day beginning with 9 o'clock and ending at most up to lunch that is two hours and one and a half hours so you have totally three and half hours at most okay you need not use all give them a either a Jalak or a trailer or a what they say the pilot episode of a serial called psychrometry, combustion, compressible flow kinetic theory that means since you have about three hours say about 30 to 45 minutes for each followed by may be 10, 15 minutes for discussion and all possible no teaching saying what you will do what you will derive what way it will be done what type of exercises will be done you can even bring a few slides of you know some exercises and say this is the typical problem and we will be using this possible. So your job is psychro combustion kinetic theory, this job is compressible flow it is left between you to exchange topics if you feel great advantage of we get teacher of a coordinate okay. So I think that is agreed that we will have on third day morning a an idea of what is involved in our scheme of teaching of psychrometry, combustion, compressible flow and kinetic theory in psychrometry as we say we will restrict only to the psychrometric systems basic psychrometric processes and psychrometric properties and we will not go into applications like air washers and cooling towers essentially what we do basically. In combustion we will restrict to basic descriptions of fuels basic idea of combustion stoichiometry and some calorimetry then coming to compressible flow one dimensional steady compressible flow of an ideal gas with constant specific heats so that the algebra is simple and velocity of sound one dimensional converging diverging ducts that means nozzles and diffusers and may be normal shock I think that is up to that point is good enough and kinetic theory you decide those yeah, yeah, yeah so it is needed I am just giving them and you a hint of what is to be expected this is just an advertisement short break for what is happening on like likely to happen on Friday okay so Friday morning UVB plus BP okay now the next thing is I think all of you have this thing in your packet okay I think it is a mental set that mechanical engineers work with essentially two fluids they cannot breathe without those two one is air and one is water steam in some form or the other since air is a much simpler fluid we generally make do with algebraic equations for its properties that is not true for water and steam so we have to have steam tables there is nothing special about these steam tables one of us discovered this way back in the 80s when it was much thinner than this and after that we found that it is good enough it was also cheap enough even now I think it is some 20 or 24 rupees at that time it was when I first bought it it was 4 rupees or so the Mollier chart has been added earlier it was not included and this is good enough for undergraduates I am sure there are equivalent steam tables and I had requested you to bring the steam table which you use so that when we discuss properties of steam if there are any issues pertaining to this steam table or other steam table we will have it for discussion so I think all of you should have it with you in the one of the issues which we will have to discuss is that in the final workshop we will have a few quizzes some two quizzes I plan to have one at the end of the first week and one on the ninth day or tenth day morning but one thing we were not really satisfied with from the last workshop was the feedback and submissions from the participants at the end of the workshop so this time Professor Fatak and the NMEI city the main central committee has decided that we must have a reasonable contribution from each participant or a group of participants before the certificates are handed out the certificate should not be handed out only for attending and participating in the workshop so one thing is there will be two quizzes it will be necessary for the candidate participant to appear for each one of these two quizzes and it will be necessary for the participant or a group of participants if we decide to submit an assignment and during these three days we will see what type of assignments are possible there are some three schemes which I have already thought about and we will propose those three schemes and we will give a choice that a team of participants say between 5 and 10 that also we depend on the number of participants will either do an assignment of type A or assignment of type B or assignment of type C one will be exercises one will be creation of a set of slides I will demonstrate what I have in mind or helping out with some sort of a spoken tutorial I will show that also so that is another thing which we have to do so it is 1045 so let us take a break


official mission and earlier today he chose the name. Good morning, Houston. Good morning, Paul. Dr. Thomas, you will be the seventh and final U.S. astronaut to live on the Russian space station. In view of the well-publicized mishaps with the aging space station last year, are you in any way apprehensive about the next four and a half months? Not really. I don't think that there's safety issues that I need to be concerned about. I think the Russians have done a very good job of stabilizing the situation on mere following some very serious situations last year. My concern more is just learning to live and function for a long time on a day-to-day basis in conditions which at times it might be difficult. There might be difficult temperatures and hard work and so on. And I think those are the more realistic concerns that I have. Dr. Thomas, we should point out there's an Australian native who has undergone training at the Gagarin Cosmonaut Training Center in Russia. How is your Russian? Well, it's better than I ever thought it would be. Then again, I thought I would never need to learn Russian. I enjoy learning it. I wish it was a little better. I don't have the spontaneity of language that I have, obviously, with English, but I think I can communicate and I can understand what's being said, and that's the important thing. You have also worked in your career at the Gen Propulsion Laboratory. Do you have any messages you want to say hello to, whether you're friends in Pasadena? I still have a lot of friends there. It's a number of years since I worked there, but I enjoy the time I had there very much. It was a fascinating place to work and a wonderful place to live, and I hope the people there are watching this flight unfold. Very well, sir. Commanding the mission is Marine Lieutenant Colonel Terrence Wilcott. Colonel, this is your third shuttle mission. You've already logged more than 500 hours in space. It's a little different than flying combat aircraft, isn't it? Yes, quite a bit. As a matter of fact, we don't have anything on here to do any combat with. And we'll hope that it continues that way. Is it still as thrilling as it must have been the first time you lifted off? And I think Story Musgrave put it right when he said that he hated acid, but he loved being in space. It's definitely a thrill, and I think we all view acid as something we have to go through to get into space where we do our work. This is Air Force Major Michael Anderson's first shuttle mission.  So I was pretty surprised by the launch. It was a lot smoother than I had expected. There was a little bit of noise, a little bit of vibration, but not nearly as much as I had expected from watching launches from outside the space shuttle. Overall, it went by pretty quickly and it was a real nice ride. Getting up on space, we had about five hours before we had to prepare to go to bed. It was a real busy five hours, and as you can imagine when it was time to go to bed, it was very difficult to do. But I grabbed myself a bite to eat and sat in the command of chair and looked out the window and watched the world go by, and essentially managed to catch a few hours of sleep. Also on board is Cosmonaut Salazon Sharapov. Cosmonaut, is this your first trip into space, and then what are your impressions? My impression is very good because it's very interesting work with my American colleagues. In every step, every day, every hour, I see that American astronauts can work hard and they always show me that Americans are better than Russians, but I want to say that Russians are the same, good guys, and angels can say it, so we have some. Do you speak better English than Dr. Thomas speaks Russian? I believe so. We'd like to go back to Colonel Wilkut now. Colonel, you're 48 years old, older than the others on the flight, I believe, but you were just a kid when John Glenn made his first spaceflight. How do you feel about having him back in the program? I think it's great that I would love to fly with him. He was at the launch last night. Did you get to meet him? I met Senator Glenn before when he came to Houston and received a lot of briefs on the science that we do on the shuttle, and he took that information back to Washington to share with the other senators. So I met him. He's a very fine and distinguished gentleman. Although it's been said that sending John Glenn back into space is not an effort to give the U.S. space program a boost, has it had that effect though? I think so. Literally 100% of the people I've talked to think it's a good idea, so I think that. But you know, NASA, we're on sort of a roll anyway. We've had with the Mars exploration, the shuttle science, the mirror program, the International Space Station getting ready to crank up. So I don't think that we really needed the boost, but it's why Senator Glenn, if that gave us one, then I'm glad to get that one too. Briefly, can you give us an idea of what some of the supplies are that you have on board that you'll be taking to the mirror? I'm one of them actually. I'm one of the main things that they're going to transfer to the mirror, and I'll be on the mirror for four months. So to support me in that period, they're taking obviously a lot of food, a lot of water, clothing, some equipment that I would need on mirror to operate with the Russian systems, but also a suite of experiments that I'll be operating during my time on mirror since that's one of the main functions that I'll have while I'm up there. The site of Earth from space, we've seen pictures and we know something of what it looks like, but still nothing of what it feels. What did it feel like for you? Well, it's breathtaking. Pictures don't do justice to the way the Earth looks with your own eyes from this vantage point. It's just a beautiful place. It's just a wonderful creation. When I first got my glimpse of Earth from up here, it's just impossible to describe. It's a fantastic view. I imagine not many African American youngsters when you were a child actually aspired to space travel or space work. How did you come upon this desire of his aspiration? Well, I think for me it was a combination of a number of things. My father was in the Air Force, so my exposure was to a lot of high-tech things, a lot of airplanes and a lot of the gadgetry that the Air Force had at the time. And also just an interest in science fiction. I was a big science fiction fan as a kid. I watched all kinds of television shows like Lost in Space and Star Trek. And I think just from watching those shows and seeing what those people were doing and from going to work with my dad and seeing what he did, just kind of developed a natural interest in me. You don't want to do something like that. Wonderful. Commander Wilkut, this is, of course, the third space mission for you. Does it get repetitive for you or does the excitement recur each and every time? We only get to do this about every year and a half if you're lucky enough to do that. So it certainly never gets repetitive. It's exciting every single time. And how did you come to the space program? Well, sort of the same way I also, I guess, was always interested in space just from the science fiction, the movies, whatever. But so I was nearing the end of my tour as a test pilot and I was thinking about what I wanted to do next. A good friend of mine that was already in the astronaut program asked me if I would be interested in that. And it seemed like a way to continue really the work that you do as a test pilot. And you get to work with a lot of very, very bright young engineers and scientists. And so it seemed like something I'd be interested in. Dr. Andy Thomas, you're, as I understand it, the last person the shuttle will deliver to the space station mere before the construction begins on the new international space station. What exactly will you do or will be doing between now and then to prepare for the construction of the new space center? You're correct. I will be the last US representative on the mere space station following six predecessors who have all done very good jobs under sometimes very trying circumstances. I'll be spending my time on the mere space station running a suite of experiments that are from US sponsorship looking at the effect mostly of long duration space flight on the behavior of the human body. And I'll also be supporting the cosmonauts in operating and maintaining the space station and keeping it flying. So I expected to be pretty busy during my time there. And that kind of experience obviously is going to feed directly into the international space station because it's going to give us guidance on how you should operate one of these large opening vehicles. Major Anderson, back to you again. If there is one space mission either conceived or yet not conceived that you'd like to be on and you'd like to be a part of what would it be? I think that's an easy question for me. I always thought it'd be nice to go to Mars and that's something that I think the space program is going to be looking at rather closely at very soon here and that's something that I think every astronaut in the program would really like to be a part of. You know a trip to another planet to explore that planet and see what's out there is something that would be very exciting for anyone.


presents Barbara Stanwyck, Robert Ryan and Roddy McDowell. The mutual network in cooperation with Family Theatre presents the leading lady, starring Barbara Stanwyck and Robert Ryan. To introduce the drama, here is your host, Roddy McDowell. Thank you, Johnny Lafranco. Family Theatre's only purpose is to bring to everyone's attention a practice that must become an important part of our lives if we are to win peace for ourselves, peace for our families, and peace for the world. Family Theatre urges you to pray. Pray together as a family. And now to our drama, the leading lady, starring Barbara Stanwyck as Judith and Robert Ryan as Phil. I'll get it, Judith. Hello? Who? Oh, sure, sure, put him on. No, wait a minute. Judith, it's the police commissioner. How nice for us. It's probably about the tiara. Do you want to talk to him? It's probably about a dozen free tickets for the Saturday matinee. I do not want to talk to him. He's a great fan of yours, Judith. Doesn't do any harm to be nice. I am nice. I'm as nice as pie. I'm just not here. Well, I'll say you're rehearsing or something. OK, Jenny, put him on. Hello, commissioner. Good to hear from her. Well, yes, good to hear your voice. Yeah, we're back at the same old stand again. Sorry you missed opening night. Great, she's great. Yeah, I was just telling her. No, no, Judith isn't here right now. No, they're running lines just to brush up downstairs. Yeah, yeah, I consider myself the most honored producer on Broadway, having Judith Carter as a leading lady. Oh, yes, yes, about the tiara. Well, the insurance company is afraid it might be stolen. No, no, Judith just wears it on stage during the play. I see, I see. Well, maybe that is our best bet. No? Well, all right. Sure, sure, we'll be glad to talk to him. Thanks again, commissioner, bye. Well, Mr. Mitchell, you honored producer? They're sending us a private detective. Oh, this is very silly, Mitchell. I'm beginning not to like it. Oh, well, it's all we can do, Judith. They can't put a policeman on this kind of a job. It had set a precedent. You and your publicity, man. Why must it be a real tiara I wear in the play? People don't go to the theater to look at jewelry. It was just an idea. Bad idea, I admit it. But now the publicity's out on it. Well, then run an ad saying I won't be wearing a real tiara. It's very simple. No, it's not, Judith. A lot of people have bought tickets. To see the tiara, I suppose. To see you, of course not the tiara. But some smart lawyer could pick us up for misrepresentation. All right, who's the detective? What does he do, guard me? Only for a week or so, just to keep the insurance company quiet. Then I will run an ad saying we're not going to have the real tiara anymore. I'll explain it, and the thing will be settled. A watchdog? Just while you're wearing it on stage.  With a derby and a big cigar. All right, shoot me. I made a mistake. Mitch, you can get yourself into the craziest situations, and me. Well, anyway, you'll get to meet yourself a real, live, private eye. He's on his way over now for approval. How much do you suppose that old thing is really worth? The tiara? Make $10,000. It's diamond. Well, I'm off to the hairdresser. What time is it? 4.30. Who's it tonight, the account executive? No, no more account executive. He went to the coast. Good. He was wrong for you. He was, Mitch. I'm beginning to think they all are. Judith, if you were my 32-year-old daughter, I'd send you to Memphis to get married. I'm 29. Besides, I've never played Memphis. That's what I mean. I'd like that explained. I'd really like a step-by-step explanation of that crime. Yes? OK, OK, send him in. Who is it? The private eye. Goodbye. Now, stay, stay for the last. You'll have to meet him anyhow. Mr. Mitchell? Yes, come in, come in. My name's Wheeler, Phil Wheeler.  Of course, you know, Miss Judith Carter. Yeah, yes, it's a pleasure.  What? Oh, nothing, I'm being funny. Have you been a private detective very long? No, no, not long, a year or two. The commissioner tell you what this is all about? I didn't talk to him. Captain Ahern down at the fourth precinct said it was about an attempted jewel robbery. Oh, it isn't that big. No one's tried to steal anything. But Judith wears this diamond business on her head during the second and third acts of the play. Yeah, I read about that in the paper, the tiara. Real diamonds. Don't you think it's a clever idea, Mr. Wheeler? Imagine real diamonds right on my head. Doesn't it make you want to dash up to the box office? I don't know. Maybe it's. That's what I like, Mr. Wheeler, a man of conviction, a man who will make a decision and stick by it. Say, what's the rib for? I just came here to do a job. Yes, turn it off, will you, Judy? All right, Mr. Wheeler, I'll turn it off. What do private detectives charge? By the day, at $20 in expenses.  We'll pay you $15. Now, Judith, I'm the one who's picking up the check. And you'll pay him $15. That's equitable. He only works three hours a night. Why make such a big thing of it? It's $15, Mr. Wheeler. Do you take it? Looks like I'll have to. The curtain's at $8.20 sharp. Be outside my dressing room by $8.15. All right. I guess that's all. See you this evening, Mr. Wheeler. Yeah, $8.15. So long, Mr. Mitchell. So long, Wheeler, and good luck. He's cute. Say, what's gotten into you? That guy probably needs every dollar he can lay his hands on. I wanted to see if he'd fight for it. Sometimes I don't know what goes on in your head.  You walk down the street. People recognize you. Pay him the $20. Pay him $25. No, no, I'll pay it. What gets into you? What are you searching for? I don't know. Some sort of a man. Foy. He is cute. Cute, but spineless. Isn't that the way you like him? And he's worried about something, too. Did you notice that? Probably his bank balance. No, no, no. He's got something on his mind, some problem. Judith, you're getting that look on your face. Am I? Remember, I've got a run-of-the-play contract with you. Judith. Judith. Oh, you're not listening to me. Me, Ms. Carter. Wheeler. Come in. Come in. Well, right on time, Mr. Wheeler. Very good. Thanks. Oh, this is the object of all the excitement, the tiara. I thought it was supposed to stay in the box office safe until I picked it up. Yes. Yes, it was. Pretty, isn't it? It was pretty expensive. You shouldn't have taken it out of the safe, Ms. Carter. Oh, don't play private detective so hard, Phil. It is Phil, isn't it? Yeah, it's Phil. Really, Ms. Carter, that's an expensive piece of jewelry. If someone wanted to grab it. This? Nobody would have it. I guess you don't read the papers. In the last three months, right here in the New York area, there have been almost half a dozen jewel robberies. Impending disaster. Oh, I love it. Is it a gang? Do the police think it's all the work of one gang? Maybe very funny to you, Ms. Carter.  OK, OK. But you're paying me $15 a day. $20. What? I mean $25. $25? But this afternoon, you said. Ah, that was this afternoon, Philip. You've been promoted. But I don't get what. You can use the extra money, can't you? Use it. I'll say I can use it, but. I thought so. Philip, what's worrying you? Well, nothing. Now, don't lie to me. Something's worrying you. What is it? Do you have a family to support? Well, in a way. You mean you're married? No, but I live with my mother. She's sick, isn't she? No. Carter, in two minutes, Ms. Carter. Yes. Well, what's wrong with her? My mother? Nothing. Well, then, what's bothering you? Maybe I can help. I'd like to help. There's nothing you can do, Ms. Carter, and nothing anyone can do. It's about money, though, isn't it? In a way, yeah. But I've got to work it out myself. Well, I'm on now. We'll talk about this after the show. But really, Ms. Carter? No, but it's about it, Philip. Oh, you're in trouble, I can tell. You don't understand, Mitch. I understand the whole thing perfectly. This handsome chamois with the blue eyes has got you on a merry-go-round. Are you wrong, Mitch? The tiara was supposed to go back a week ago. It's still around, and so is he. Phil is all mixed up inside. He needs help. That's why I want to keep him on. Steak sandwiches at Armond's every night after the show. Is that help? Well, I'm just trying to give him a breath of air, a look at our world. You've fallen for him, haven't you? No, absolutely. Positively, no. I like him. Mm-hmm. Baby, you're going to be sorry. Take my word for it. Oh, Mitch, can't you see? I see, I see, fine. That private eye of yours is a phonus balonus. He's a sweet confused guy. He's fishy, baby. He's fishy as an aquarium. Mitch, I've never had to tell you to mind your own business. Well, then don't start now. Something else about your Mr. Wheeler. He's buck hungry. Mitch, I've heard enough. He hasn't got a problem. He just loves that dollar. That's all, Mitch. OK, OK. I don't expect you to understand this, Mitch. I can even see why you think it's, well, maybe even foolish. But I want to help Phil find himself, if I can. I'm out of this, Judy. I've said my piece, and now I'm out of it. You can waltz this guy around any way you want. Don't worry, Mitch. I will. I, uh, I guess Mr. Metzelin, you had some kind of a scrap, Judith. Oh, we have them all the time. I just wanted to bring you up to date, Phil. You mustn't mind him. Or I guess you'd call him suspicious. Of me? Of you, of anyone, everyone. He fathers me. I'm, I'm his galateer. Is what? That's sure. That's a play, Bernard Shaw, Pygmalion. He got the idea from a man who made a statue, galateer, and then fell in love with it. Pygmalion made the statue. Much later Shaw wrote the play. You see? Yeah, I see. Well, I'm Mitch's galateer, except that he's not in love with me. I'm old enough to be his daughter. You mean he's old enough to be your father? That's right. You want to dance? No, I already have. It's a snare and a delusion. Tell me about your mother, Philip.  She's my mother, that's all. But you love her? Sure, I love her. Oh, mother love. My mother lives in Chicago with my father. Are you buck hungry, Philip? Am I what? Mitch says you love that dollar. Do you love that dollar? Like anything else, I guess the things you love most are the ones you don't have. Oh, Philip, that scans.  The things you love most are the ones you don't have. You and Nick Kenny. What about your sandwich, aren't you hungry? Chicken salad, that's my sandwich. And no, no, I'm not. You know, I don't get this, Judith. I don't get it at all. What are we doing here? You're my private detective. They might steal the tiara. The tiara's back in the box office safe. Even so, they might steal it. I'm glad you realize it.  What are you chasing? What are you after? Maybe that dollar you were talking about. You're fishy, Philip. You're very fishy, as an aquarium. Look, if you don't like- Mr. Philip Wheeler? Yes? Excuse me, sir, you wanted to borrow a gentleman. Oh, sure, sure. I'll be right back, Judith. Yes, of course. Which way is it? Right this way, sir. I won't be a moment. Oh, yes, you will. You'll be a couple, maybe three. That gentleman, sir, wearing the gray hat. Thanks. Here. Thank you, sir. Hello. Any action yet? Nothing definite. What about the girl? Well, that's really a great question. I could write a book about the girl. I mean, does she suspect anything? No, I don't think so. You had a good look at those diamonds? A good long look, just right. Play along another week or so. We don't want to fumble the ball. We won't. OK, I'll see you. OK, see you. Well, there she is, Mr. Wheeler. Locked up for the night again, good and tight. Yeah. Even if someone wanted to bust into the box office here, they'd never crack that safe. She's a beauty. Mm-hmm, yeah. Hey, can I give you a lift? You'll drown in that rain. No, no, thanks, Harry. I'll walk. I'm just over on 48. Well, if you don't mind getting soaked. Oh, night air will do me good. Good night, Harry. Night, Mr. Wheeler. Yeah? Let's step into the doorway here out of the rain. I'd like to talk to you. Sure. This is my pal. How do you do? Hi. We want to talk to you about those diamonds you're standing around all the time. Yeah? Can we talk to you? Depends on what you got to say. Well, we was thinking maybe we could talk money to you. All right. Yeah, we're all talking the same language thing. You don't know, I think. I don't know your names. We've been very busy in this town. We come in from Cleveland. Yeah, Cleveland, Ohio. What's your proposition? We got a fence that'll take that tiara if we can get it. Yeah, but we ain't no good at safe something like that, see? Who sent you here? How do I know this isn't a phony? You put the word out, didn't you? Your own guy sent us. What guy? Oh, you know, big guy over on 3rd Avenue. Where's the gray hat? Name or who? Name or nothing. We don't ask no names. How do I know you can handle a job like this? You have to do it during the show. All sorts of people, backstage. Well, look, look. You read the papers. Yeah. You read them last month about that high stove on east side. Big party going on downstairs all the time. Yeah. Papers said $18,000 bucks were taken. And I remember. Malaki. Didn't bring four. What do you think this will bring? Oh, the fence will go $3,500. Can't look as if I'm in on it. Don't worry. It won't. You're figuring to have a boat ways, huh? Do you blame me? No, I don't blame you. That car, the name's nice. OK, we've got a deal then, huh? We've got a deal. Come on up to my place and we'll work it out. Yeah. Come in, crown jewels. Hello, Willie. Good evening, Mr. Mitchell. Let me have that filled with you. I'm running a little behind schedule. Sure, here. How's the private detective business, Wheeler? Oh, getting along. How many other clients you got besides us? A couple. None of them this steady, though. I'll bet they aren't. Mitch. What's going on, Judith? Did I walk in on something? In a way, yes. We were talking about you, Phillip. She was talking about you. I was just listening. We were wondering, have you ever thought about going on the stage? You mean acting? Oh, don't look so shocked. You might be very good. You look good. You're tall. So is our dorm. Mitch. I've never been on a stage in my life, Judith. Thanks, but I don't think it had worked. Oh, man. Mitch, you promised to let me handle it, and I'm going to. I'll get it. Hello? I'm not here. Yeah? Oh, OK. Sure, I'll be right out. Who was it? Stage door, a couple of baskets of flowers for you. Flowers? From whom? I didn't say. I'll go out and have them brought in. Wasn't there a note? Didn't say. I'll be right back. Those are the flowers for Mr. Carter? Yeah, that's right. Now, we're supposed to deliver them personal. All right, follow me. You've got the money with you? Yeah, we got it. Well, come on. Come on, let's have it. Uh-uh. After we get the tiara. There won't be time, then. Oh, there'll be time. Don't worry. This dressing room? Yeah. Hold it a second. OK, no one's looking.  You ready? Yeah, go ahead. Open it up. And it's not even opening. All right, lady. Let's have that thing on your head. What is this? Clam up up. Come on, lady. Come on, come on. Philip, who are these men? They put a gun on me, Judith. What could I do? That's it, lady. Take it off and hand it to us. Somebody guards you are. You want me to get myself killed? No, Philip. Of course not. Here, take it. Wow. What's your blinds, Miss Carter? Now, everyone just stay put till we're out of here, and there won't be no trouble. Philip, don't try any heroics. It isn't worth it. Don't worry, Judy. He won't. I don't see you sticking your neck out, Mitchell. I'm not paid. OK, OK. Simit down all of you. Five minutes, Miss Carter. Five minutes. Say OK. Yes, all right. Now, keep this straight. I'm only going to say it once. It'll take us about a minute to get clear of this place. It can go real smooth if you want it to. But if you don't, someone might get hurt. Not you, but someone out there you'll like. Everything clear? OK, come on, Turk. They got it. Wait a minute. Forget it, Shamus. You're out of luck. Phil, what are they talking about?  Easy, Mr. Easy. You should have collected first. This is beginning to add up. Phil, you knew about this? You were in it with them? All right, what of it? But you didn't have to do that. I would have helped you. Miss Carter, can I see you for a moment? Who's that? Well, it's, uh, uh. It's the callboy, isn't it? Yeah, yeah, the callboy. You, uh, you better let him in. No, no, no, Turk. Stay put. I ain't the same guy knocked before. I tell you, it's the callboy.  Miss Carter, she'll be right out. I think someone's tipped off. I don't know. Come on, lady, you're going with us. Me? You, get over here. Don't do it, Judy. Look, we're getting out of here, Pop. She goes along to make sure we do.  You can't both hide behind it. I don't figure too pretty, boy. You're coming too. Get over here. Look, give me a break. Over heaven's sake, Phil. At least throw a little backbone. Ah, Shamish, you're letting the lady down pretty hard. Maybe not. Hey, what are you doing? Let go of my hand. Get down, Judy. Turn, take her out.  Yeah, we're OK, Lieutenant. Lieutenant? What, Lieutenant? What's going on here? Lieutenant Wade Mann, police department. All right, boys. Take him down and book him. What's the story here, Wheeler? Are you a cop? I mean, a real cop? That's right, Mr. Mitchell. But the commissioner said he couldn't give me a real cop. We had to do it this way, Mr. Mitchell, to get Turk and his pal out in the open. So you had Wheeler pose as a private eye. Yes. Worked out pretty good. We've been trying to pin something solid on these two ever since they had turned. Well, how do you like them? I'm very sorry we had to cut it so close, Miss Carter. It'll be all right, Lieutenant. Yeah. Well, I got to get down to the station and book these birds. Coming along, Phil? In a little while, I'll see you down there. Goodbye, Miss Carter. Goodbye. I'll see you out, Lieutenant. I take it all back, Wheeler. Don't mention it. Well, Judy, I, uh... Don't talk to me. Get out. Get out. I've never been so humiliated in my whole life of all the deceitful, underhanded... What's going on here? And I thought you needed help. I thought you were weak and confused. I had to put on some kind of an act. Some kind of an act?  That's crazy. I was doing a job. Shoot, but spineless. That's what I thought you were.  Where do you get that nothing but stuff? Get out. Get out of my sight. Kurt, in two minutes, Miss Carter, you want us to hold it? No, I'll be there. I thought I told you to go away. I'm not going anywhere.  I won't listen. Oh, yes, you will. I just now figured you out. I was even going to make an actor out of you. Isn't that rich?  That's exactly why I am so. I can't stand to sneak. You can't stand anything else. I'll prove it to you. You're insane. Get out. As long as I measured down to your estimate of a man, I was in good. That's the silliest thing I ever heard. Now will you please get out? I'll be late for my entrance. Oh, no, you won't. That's one thing you'll never miss. That's part of what's wrong with you. I'm not listening. You don't mind being deceived. For all you knew up to a few minutes ago, I deceived you about that robbery. You thought I was in on it. You were even willing to forgive me, just as long as I didn't do anything out of character. As long as I was weak, and sick, and spineless, you could stand it. Rock. That's rock. That's when I turned out to be a cop, instead of a quivering neurotic. That's when you got mad. I thought I was helping you. I thought you needed me. Is that wrong? I just wanted to help. What's wrong with helping somebody? Stop clobbering. Oh. You do everything on cue. All the world's a soap opera.  I notice you've stopped crying. Now I'm a vicious brute. All men are either helpless weaklings or vicious brutes. Only women can be both good and strong.  You've been playing Sean Ibsen too long. What do you know about Sean Ibsen? Plenty. We'll talk about it some night. You know something else? I'm in love with you. I wouldn't marry you if you were the last man on Earth. Look around you. Maybe I am. I could scratch your eyes out. Could you, Judy? Oh, Phil. Oh, Phil. Judy, don't. Don't cry.  Yeah, I figured I might be able to use it sometime.  Pete's being a helpless weakling. You know, maybe it's the other way around. I think I know what you mean. Oh, Phil. You said you thought you knew what I meant. About things being the other way around? Yeah. But it only works in pairs, honey. If I could be the helpless brute, would you? Oh, yes, Phil. I'd love to be the vicious weakling. On behalf of Family Theater, our thanks to Barbara Stanwyck, Robert Ryan, and the entire cast. This is Roddy McDowell again. Now, it is true that Family Theater's only purpose is to urge us all to pray. Although as a rule, the play presented each week steers clear of any kind of preachment with the reminder of prayer confined to what might be called the commercial. Now, that's what I'm here for. However, in the comedy we've just heard, I think Judah's attitude came close, very close, to precipitating an emotional tragedy by reason of a very common form of pride. She'd have forgiven Philip for being a weakling, even a thief, which is all well and good, for giving us being a fine thing, too. But her egotism nearly got the better of her when he turned out to be a decent man. She had painted a mental picture of herself, the great forgiver, the strong-willed woman. And she couldn't face the truth, pride. By contrast, the basis of prayer is humility, which has been defined not as false self abasement, but simply as facing the truth, the truth in action, which Judith was unwilling to do. Again, she wanted to be the dominant partner, unwilling to marry a man not abjectly dependent upon her, although that could hardly form the foundation of a balanced family life. Families, and I speak as a member of a close one, seem to thrive best on mutual cooperation, everyone close to each other, trying to understand the other, his nature and his needs, and working together in order to help each other. And in all humility, depending on our Heavenly Father. That is why, each week, not so much in the play itself, as in this part of the program, family theater repeats week in and week out. And untiringly, it's true and tremendous slogan that the family that prays together stays together.  From Hollywood, family theater has brought you the leading lady, starring Barbara Stanwyck and Robert Ryan. Roddy McDowell was your host. Others in our cast were Ted DeCorsia, Ken Christie, Jack Krushen, Charles Smith, Pat McGeehan, and Michael Hayes. The script was written by John T. Kelly, with music composed and conducted by Harry Zimmerman, and was directed for family theater by Joseph F. Mansfield. This is Tony LaFranco expressing the wish of family theater that the blessing of God may be upon you and your home, and inviting you to join us next week when family theater will present Curtin Call for Genesius, starring Tyrone Power, Billy Burke, and Betty Lin. Join us, won't you? The broadcast throughout the world originates in the Hollywood studios of the world's largest network. This is the Mutual Broadcasting System.


You'd be on screen alert against these guys, and how maybe does that change things? Well, you just, it's hard to just sit there and play a screen all the time. Screen is, we've always talked about a screen being nobody, not one individual's play. It's everybody's play on defense. You just got to rally to it. You got to do a good job of knowing who's got the contain on it if you're in zone, who's inside out, who's got what we call the point, and just got to rally to it. No matter what zone that you're in, we kind of always talk about, like I say, who's outside in, who's inside out, and who's got the point. Then everybody else got to rally to it.  So, I mean, that's just what it is. If you sit and play screen all day, they're going to get killed on the other things. So it's a team play. Screen is a team play. What do you think of yourself, Brady? You go to court. Incredible. That's an incredible day. I mean, he was on fire. I mean, it was like, but I think it was like the last time that he had some record that was in prime time that he was on fire too. It seems like, so it's in prime time, is it? So anyway, he's, I mean, I've faced him a lot of times and I've been around, and he's just, when he's in the groove, he's in the groove.  Got great vision, reads coverages extremely well. I just, it was one of those nights he was on fire. Mike said maybe a Dory in a third down role, he's still got to sort things out. How much can he help you if he's back in some capacity? Well, certainly he can help us if he's back. It's just, you know, those guys make that call, whether or not he's going to play. And if he can play, we will certainly use him and in some capacity, whatever it might be, Paul. Well, I think everybody you try to, I don't think there's anybody you don't try to do that. I mean, we tried to do it last year with Brady. You try with everybody. I mean, I don't think you ever, you know, just say abandon it and say, look, you know, we're going to just line up in cover two and he's going to know we're in cover two. I think I don't care who the quarterback is, whether it was Peyton, whether it was Tom, whether it was Drew, any of those guys, I think you're always going to try to do something, you know, and hope that you can, hope you can do it right and maybe once in a while catch them. But I don't think there's any time you want to just sit back here and let the guy just flat out. No, maybe that would be a disguise, just flat out looking like we're supposed to look. If you do catch them, what does that mean in terms of the hope, like a second of delay? What you're doing is just trying to get him to hold the ball a little bit. That's really what disguise is all about is disguise is trying to get the guy to hold the ball. When we pressure, when you pressure, you know, the first thing we always tell them, look, there's three things that you want from pressure. Number one, yeah, you'd like a sack. But number two, if you don't get the sack, then you want to have at least a pressure guy in the guy's face so he has to throw a little bit under dress. And then number three, if you don't get those two, you're really what you want as a quick outcome. So at least then you can rally to the ball. You know, what's bad is when you pressure and the guy's got all day to throw back there, then you're in trouble. So it's one of those three things that you're always looking for when you disguise and when you pressure. Week in and week out. Teams know Michael Thomas is going to get the ball, but he still has 133 receptions. What stands out when you watch him? He's just got incredible hands. He's quick. He's got great release. Guys try to press him. He's got different ways of getting off.   He's just a talented, talented receiver. And I know everybody, you want to double those guys as much as you can. But again, you can't double them all the time. Everybody's got to be aware, obviously, of where he is. And that certainly is our case. It was last week. It was number 10. And we did a great job through three quarters. I think he had like two catches for 15 yards. And then we just, for whatever reason, in the fourth quarter, we lost him twice. The scramble one, that's always tough, because the guy's going to scramble away from you and the quarterback has time to throw. But the two other ones, we just, we should have been aware of where he was. And we shouldn't allow those two plays. So we just can't allow that with 13. What kind of case of no multiple position? Not just like multiple positions where he would catch or run the ball, but also line up the quarterback and know that he can throw it. Well, he can do, yeah, he's just, what a talent. I mean, what a, they utilize him in the best possible way.  You know, you've got 41 who can dart and do everything else. And then you've got number seven, no fair dodging.  So he's, he's just a talented, talented football player that can do, I'm just amazed. Bockpunth, special teams could probably play linebacker if they ask him to.  Is he going to be a wide receiver? Going to be a running back, quarterback, tight end. What's he going to be?  They got a lot of problems on offense.


Hey guys, welcome back to my YouTube channel. This is Daniel Rossell again, another video today about the Canon XA40 Pro Camcorder. What I want to talk about today is whether it's possible to attach lens filters to the lens and indeed it is. What you need to know firstly is that you're looking for and I'll just bring my little lens pouch into frame here as I have it labeled. It's a 58mm lens and that will attach on. Now what you need to do to access the actual lens is take off the lens hood that it came with and you can see I actually have a lens filter on top of the lens and this is just and I'll just screw it off now so you can see I have it on quite tightly. This is a UV lens filter and as you can see on the side here somewhere it says it's 58mm lens. Now lens filters can be used for a variety of purposes firstly because the lens has built-in UV protection one use that you might want to make this is just to have it on purely for protection so that the actual lens of the camcorder is never directly exposed or no sand or whatever can actually get into the real lens of the camcorder. So if you've been using it as is you might want to give it a good clean and then you can put that on. So 50mm it'll go flush and the cool thing is that you can still use the lens hood you just need to fit it over the lens filter and it should work perfectly. You've got your retractable lens hood as before. Now what kind of lens filters are available in 58mm on the market? Well there's actually a ton of them you can go for the basic UV filter and just use it for protection as I'm doing. I also have here a ND lens. Now we know there's an LD setting on the camcorder I personally prefer to do everything physically now so this is an ND 16 lens and again if you go for everything 58mm you can get variable stop ND filter lenses you can get CPL lens filters, FLD lens filters, color effect lens filters. These are just little lens filters that will fit on top of the fixed lens so there's kind of a myth that because camcorders are usually fixed lens including the XA40 that you can do things like put on telephoto after lens attachments so there's telephoto, macro and wide angle lens you'll find a bunch of different lens adapters available for the XA40 and of course you can use lens filters like the one I did to achieve additional effects. I hope this video is useful if you're an XA40 owner there are products out there just make sure that whatever you're buying you don't need to specifically look for XA40 lens filters because there won't be many with that description. Look for 58mm and once you have the diameter correct they should all fit onto the the camcorder. Thanks for watching have a great day


Check one, two. There is a video on YouTube that's been kicking around for almost 10 years now. Some people have already found it. Back when I was in high school, I was accepted into the New York State, call it all state. It's like I was selected to be the piano player in the jazz band for all state, which at the time coming from this tiny school where I graduated with like less than 40 kids, it felt like a really big deal. It's not that it wasn't. I mean, it was obviously like a very cool thing that I got to do, but it clearly didn't have any indication on my rank or whatever you wanna call it as a pianist in the state. But regardless, it wasn't something that happened all that often. So the newspaper wanted to do a video on me. So they came to my house, the reporter came to my house with some equipment and we did this interview. And it's something. I thought it would be fun to watch that video. And just see what high school Charles had going on at that time. My name is Charles Cornell. I'm 17, I go to Hartford Central School and I've recently been selected for this. I'm sorry. I went running earlier and it's not super warm out. And so I've got that chest and I'm terrible where I ever run forever, so I keep coughing, but oh my God, no. Why do I look like I have caterpillars for eyebrows?  And I'm glad to see we made zero effort to set up the interview space. I could see stuff in the background on shelves and just a mess in my living room. Don't really know what the thought process was with the hair there. And I think I'm about 40 pounds lighter. Yikes. My name is Charles Cornell. I'm 17, I go to Hartford Central School and I've recently been selected for the Conference All-State Jazz Ensemble on piano. He just kind of gave me this. He was like, so just say your name, say your age, and why we're here talking to you today. And to deliver that yourself is just super weird. And I had no experience at that point ever being on camera or anything like that. So I'm just kind of like, okay, act natural. Just say the words. This is an original tune that I wrote and I will play a little bit for you. I didn't even name it. I had no idea what to say. I remember the guy didn't give me like, there was so little direction and he was just kind of like, yeah. So just, I don't know, just say something and then tell us what you're gonna play for us. Let's hear this tune and ugh. I have watched this video before. This isn't like my first time seeing it, but I don't think I've watched it in probably six years or more. So I don't even remember like how it goes. God, there's two camera angles. We are like really, this is a high scale production. This is a conference all state works through the New York State School of Music Association, which is better known as Nismo. When I was younger, I feel like a lot of young players have a tendency to fall into this trap where you learn how to play the instrument with like some technical proficiency. You know, cause I was also studying classical at this time and I could play some technically demanding pieces and whatnot. When you first learn how to improvise and you don't know any, you haven't heard enough jazz. You haven't like heard enough music, whether it's jazz or not, whatever you want to play to really understand voice and really understand like space. And so yeah, I just had this tendency of like, hey, I can play this instrument. Let me just fill up everything with as many notes as I possibly can. Students go and they perform a solo for adjudicators. We'll then score them and add any comments and any advice that they have. Oh man, dude. The acne was real. My whole growing up, that was a, it was very like, very genetic in my family. Like my brother had it. That was a time. Yeah, blue scale for the win. Oh no. I know that I'm the second student in Hartford's history to attend the conference. They asked me for that piece of information.  Or somebody would go back to that person and just be like, hey, metronomes are cool. I like how I'm also playing as if I have a bass player with me because I just wasn't really capable of playing solo piano. So I was playing everything just with all these cluster chords. Like I had a bass player covering the low parts. Dude, stop playing the blue scale. I also play the alto saxophone and the trumpet. What is my deliver, like what? I sound like a robot. Wait, wait, wait. Oh, I remember this part. I remember this part, watch this. Oh my God. I had no idea what to do because the guy didn't like, he didn't say anything. So I'm just, I finished the piece. And then I'm like, what do I do now? So watch, watch this. Oh my God. Oh, this is so weird.  Like when you go back and listen to something old or you watch a video of yourself from a long time ago and you're just, you can't just do anything but cringe. And I understand that because their point is like, but you, you were so good for, you know, for where you were and for your age and everything. And I'm like, okay, you know, I appreciate that. And, and I had put in a lot of work and I was getting better all the time and everything. But it's just one of those things where I know a lot of you guys are musicians.  Like, why did I ever think this was okay? And yeah, I mean, of course we were younger and everything, but still it doesn't make it any less painful to go back and see now. But oh my God, the awkwardness in my defense. Like I said, I was, they didn't say anything. I finished the, I picked my hands up and like silence. But the best part is they left it in the video. So great. That's such a difficult video to make anyways, like where you're asking somebody like, tell us about your accomplishments. What a weird position to put somebody in, you know? And so the delivery obviously comes off as being like, bizarre. Let's see. Oh, that's, is this my, is this my chart? Well, there you go.  I'm going to, I'm going to see if I can, did I really write that?  Did I seriously write? I wrote, I wrote a B-flat. That is, yeah, I wrote a B-flat over a D-flat or a seventh chord. I'm guessing I probably went something like that. I mean, the changes are pretty, pretty standard. But I see where I was going, but yeah, just not, not going to cut it. So anyways, I'll put a link to the original video in the description if you want to go see it. I don't even know if that, if the newspaper does anything with their YouTube channel really anymore, but if all of a sudden you guys all go watch the video, they're going to be like, what the hell's going on? Cause as far as I know, I think only like one publication from back home has, has even really taken notice of, of what I've been up to recently. So that'll, that'll probably be a very bizarre experience to all of a sudden be like, oh, what's all this trap? Where's all this traffic coming from all of a sudden? It's safe to say I've come quite a ways since then, but I guess that's the whole point, right? So anyways, that's it. Thanks, thanks for watching. And now this is, now this is really out there forever. Hey, I guess we all got to start somewhere. So thanks for watching again. Please hit subscribe if you enjoyed the video. And if you like my content, I really appreciate it. And I will see you next time. And it won't be so awkward.


When we ask homeowners to prepare their property and modify the habitat to create an environment that the tawny crazy ant cannot survive in, we ask them to move things that are on the ground, limbs, anything else that might be on the ground, move those away, especially away from the house where the tawny crazy ant might tend to get in. We also ask them to modify any type of drainage, because since the tawny crazy ant loves moisture, you know, if there's a lot of water that comes out from either air conditioners or other things around the property, it's going to be a damp area and especially have something rocks or something on that type of area. A lot of times you can't get a good treatment around the house due to the presence of so much foliage. We ask them to go out there and prune that foliage down, maybe even remove it until the tawny crazy ant populations are down. You have any potted plants out around the house, take those potted plants and put them on some type of a shelf or something, and when we talk about a shelf, not solid, but maybe some kind of expanded middle or open plastic, but there's no area that the tawny crazy ant can live under. Since the tawny crazy ant does tend to a lot of these insects that produce honeydew, we recommend yes to check to see if you have levels of those insects, prune your plants to cut down the foliage these insects are going to be on. If you can treat, you sometimes systemic insecticide to control those insects, you have a less food source for the tawnies. Once you start doing all that, remove all those, you start creating environment they just can't survive in and you'll reduce the numbers where when you do have to use a chemical creep, we have less ants to deal with. Therefore, you're perceived control of the chemicals better and you're much more satisfied.