Let us start our today's lecture on the video course on Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering. Let us look at the slide here. On this video course Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, we are currently going through module 4 on strong ground motion. So, a quick recap what we have learnt in the previous lecture like strong ground motion they evaluate the effect of earthquake and for that study we need to estimate the strong ground motion properly and strong ground motion typically produce during an earthquake in 6 directions that will be 3 translational and 3 rotational components. But for general practice we mostly use the 3 translational ground motions for any engineering design and most of the cases 3 rotational components are ignored. These are various locations of strong motion seismographs located all over India which record P wave, S wave and surface wave whenever they are not in the shadow zone of either of these waves. This is the basic principle on which an accelerometer works we have seen there are typically 3 major types of accelerometers like electronic, servo controlled and piezoelectric. But the basic principle or the basic fundamental on which this accelerometer works is a single degree of mass spring system that is if the block due to earthquake shaking if it moves or accelerate in this direction the mass which is hanging to measure that acceleration will be moved by x direction by x amount in this direction and the spring force will be equal to that mass times acceleration to maintain the equilibrium of the system. So, that is the principle that is either knowing this displacement x we can convert it to the acceleration that is k x by m or by knowing the acceleration you can convert it to the distance or displacement by which it has moved that is m a by k. So, either way we can estimate this value through this accelerometers what it does actually and geophones are commonly known as velocity transducers that is they measure the velocity of various seismic waves which we which arrive during the earthquake process. Then we have seen also the latest development in this area the instrumental development is the use of micro electronic mechanical systems or MEMS in short it is called these are as thin as human here you can see the size compared to the olden days the velocity transducers such big coils etcetera. So, now these velocity transducers are replaced by this acceleration based MEMS instrument for common measurement of this acceleration time history. This is the global seismic network GSN available in the site more than 150 stations globally which record and provide real time open access and free earthquake motions all over the world through this strong motion seismographs located at various parts of the world. Then we have discussed the importance of various ground motion parameters there are three major ground motion parameters one is amplitude frequency content and duration and we have seen that to define the damage of any civil engineering construction or design or to define an earthquake itself we need not be it need not be sufficient to express it in terms of any one of this parameter but it should be a combination of this three parameters because importance of all the three parameters we have discussed that is amplitude frequency content and duration. Now within amplitude the common measures are through peak ground acceleration or effective peak acceleration or peak ground velocity or effective peak velocity and peak ground displacement. So, these are the common forms of estimating the amplitude of an earthquake ground motion then frequency content that can be estimated using either Fourier spectra or power spectra or response spectra and the duration of an earthquake the duration of earthquake history is also very important. So, these three are the major parameters which defines a ground motion completely. Now to estimate the ground acceleration this is the basic principle on which a mass spring dashpot single degree of freedom system acts on a seismograph. So, we have derived this expression that is how this is a forced vibration similar to our previous course on soil dynamics or for NPTEL we have derived this expression here also that is the u is the relative displacement or trace displacement between the ground and the superstructure u g is the ground displacement this is a function of time of course during an earthquake how much ground displaces c is the damping coefficient and k is the stiffness coefficient. Then we have also seen what is the acceleration response ratio acceleration ratio with respect to this parameters where omega naught is the undamped natural circular frequency and omega g is the circular frequency of the ground if we replace or if we express the ground displacement that u g t in the form of a simple harmonic equation through the use of this circular frequency u g and this eta or epsilon denotes the damping ratio which can be estimated from this expression c by 2 root over k m and beta is called the tuning ratio or similar to frequency ratio what we have learnt in the soil dynamics course so omega g by omega naught. So, this way we can estimate the acceleration response ratio which is recorded and also with respect to the ground acceleration which of course is known to us from the known ground displacement profile. So, what are the amplitude parameters which we are getting either it can be in the form of a acceleration it can be in the form of a velocity or it can be in the form of a displacement. So, this is the acceleration record so from the time histories of acceleration velocity and displacement these are obtained by integrating the acceleration record. So, basic record is your acceleration record which you can get then by integrating or using different sensors like if you use velocity sensors you will get velocity record all other amplitude parameters can be calculated from this time history. You can see these three are showing typical acceleration time history record in a seismograph in three orthogonal directions in the horizontal case or translational case of acceleration. If we look at the slide the top picture this one is showing up means it is the vertical acceleration time history. This y axis will be the acceleration scale you can see over here unit is given in centimeter per second square unit and x axis is in time scale in second. So, it started over here reached a peak and then slowly it vanishes. So, it defines how long the acceleration were working or acting. So, this defines also the duration of your earthquake which needs to be estimated properly we will see in the subsequent slides later on and this gives you the maximum value of acceleration at ground level it will be p g v right sorry it will be p g a peak ground acceleration, but in vertical direction am I right.  So, this maximum value highest value in this plot whatever highest value whether it you are getting here or here that highest value you need to p you need to take as a peak value of this vertical acceleration similarly in two horizontal direction like east west and north south direction you can also have the acceleration time history record. From this time history record of acceleration if you integrate it with respect to time how you integrate curve under the profile you can get the velocity or if you can express it in terms of the function t you can integrate with respect to t you can automatically get the velocity profile with respect to time in the vertical direction in a lateral direction in east west and north south direction. Similarly, further if you integrate it with respect to time you will get the displacement profile. So, this gives the vertical displacement this gives as the horizontal east west direction displacement this gives as the horizontal north south directional displacement as you can see these are cumulative that is once you integrate obviously curve or area under the curve it will come. So, that is why you are getting it cumulative value the displacement once it occurs it remains further stationary over here. So, this is the in the vertical this is the peak displacement in vertical direction this is the this is the peak displacement in east west direction this is the peak displacement in north south direction. So, that automatically gives us only the peak value not the effective value here there is no meaning of the effective displacement as I have already discussed in the previous lecture. So, now let us discuss in detail about various this amplitude parameters like peak acceleration most commonly used measure of amplitude of a ground motion is the peak horizontal acceleration that is vertical is also important, but horizontal is most important that is p h a.  So, maximum resultant p h a is the vector sum of the two orthogonal components that is in east west direction and north south direction whatever maximum value you are getting from your accelerogram if you take the vector sum that is root over of p h a in north south direction square plus root over of the under root p h a north south square plus p h a east west square that will give you the vector sum of maximum resultant of this p h a and that estimation of p h a is most important for any design this is the value which is one of the most important parameter which we use for any civil engineering design and p h a and m m i relationship are often used for estimation of p h a that is at a site. If you know what is modified markially intensity scale of an earthquake the estimation of which we have already learnt through the process of how it felt by the observer and also by the amount of damages the triphonic and brady in 1975 they proposed the expression which can be used to estimate the p h a if you do not have any other way to measure it and p v a that is peak vertical acceleration is not that important, but it is not. So, now a days researchers differ from this statement this statement actually was given by new mark and hall way back in 1982, but after 82 several research work has been conducted and it has been shown that yes p h a is the most important, but it does not mean that p v a is not important it is also important, but may not be as important as p h a and p v a most of the time it is considered as some factor of p h a that is it can maximum go up to p h a it can never be more than p h a that is from the observed results people have researchers have already mentioned typically for the design purpose people use about two-third of p h a for the design for any structure or any civil engineering construction they use the peak vertical acceleration if they do not have the record of the vertical time history in that case for the design they will use two-third of p h a as the design value, but if you have the recorded value obviously it is better to you go by that value for your design peak acceleration data with frequency content and or duration of earthquake is important that is what we have mentioned just in the previous lecture, because the reason also given over here example like point 5 g of p h a may not cause significant damage to structure if the earthquake duration is very small that is such a high value of p h a point 5 g is pretty high that value of p h a if it occurs for a very small duration that means it may not be very much damaging to a structure say it occurs for say for one second or two second does not matter, because your structure will not get sufficient time to respond to that it needs certain time after the earthquake to respond to that system. So, if suppose at a site a p h a value of point 3 5 g which is much lower than this is continuing for a duration of say 20 seconds that will be more damaging to the structure than this point 5 g p h a. So, a simple example can be given like suppose if we slap the cheek of anybody is continuously very quickly it will remain static that is it will not get a sufficient time to respond to this if the duration is small even though the magnitude is high, but even if the magnitude is small, but if we continue it for longer period then obviously it will pain a lot. So, it depends on how much response time also you are giving along with the amplitude. So, that is why it is shown over here that it is not necessarily that point 5 g p h a will cause a large damage to your structure if the earthquake duration is very small. Now, this picture this result shows the proposed relationship between that peak horizontal acceleration and that MMI scale what I was mentioning which is given by Trifunik and Brady in 1975. Professor Trifunik is a professor at University of Southern California in USA. He worked on this area extensively and he proposed that acceleration in the unit of centimeter per second square compared with equivalent MMI scale various intensity scale of MMI. So, for horizontal he has proposed this line as a equation one can use suppose it is a 6 MMI intensity what can be the corresponding p h a from using this line. Similarly, for vertical also he has proposed another line you can see over here vertical acceleration gives by this dotted line which is little lower than the horizontal you can see over here. And other researchers like Herzberger in 1956 proposed this line Richter proposed this line and various other researchers including the Japan Meteorological Agency JMA also have given different recommendations. So, these are various recommendations or equations proposed by various researchers and the among these you can see over here the latest one is proposed by Trifunik and Brady both for p h a as well as for p v a. So, once you know your MMI using this relationship or using this chart you can estimate your p h a or p v a which you can use for further for your design. Coming to next parameters that is peak velocity and peak displacement peak horizontal velocity that is p h v is also used to characterize the ground motion p h v is better than p h a why this peak horizontal velocity is sometimes better than peak horizontal acceleration because for intermediate frequency velocity is less sensitive to compare to the higher frequency. That means, if your earthquake is having an intermediate frequency or low frequency what is the typical range I said about 1 hertz to about 4 hertz. So, if it is towards a intermediate frequency then many a times this p h a value will try to get recorded not correctly or properly in that case p h v is a better estimate because when you are integrating the p h a over time you get a entire frequency range to be observed. So, that is why intermediate frequency are also getting well recorded through this p h v. For this for this reason many a times this p h v that is peak horizontal velocity may provide a better indication for the damage than this p h a. So, if you are using the damage estimation through this values of peak horizontal velocity and acceleration in many a times p horizontal velocity will be better than the peak horizontal acceleration and that peak horizontal velocity versus MMI relationship also given by Trefnik and Brady in 1975 that can be used. Whereas the peak displacements are associated with low frequency components very low value of the frequency they are associated with the peak displacement of earthquake motion. Hence signaling and filtering error of the data is very common because at low frequency you may get some error in your recording station itself. So, you may not record it properly and hence it is not recommended for practical use over the peak horizontal acceleration and peak vertical peak horizontal velocity. So, which is the best one p h v and p h a they are the better estimate for the amplitude estimation of any earthquake than your p h d that is peak horizontal displacement. Now, let us see in this slide what are the other amplitude parameters like sustained maximum acceleration what is known as sustained maximum acceleration the absolute values of highest accelerations that sustained for 3 and 5 cycles in acceleration time history those are defined as either 3 cycles sustained or 5 cycles sustained acceleration respectively. So, if we see the plot of acceleration versus time suppose the acceleration versus time plot is somehow going like this. Now, in this case earlier we have discussed that highest value say this is the maximum value that will be your peak ground acceleration. So, that is your p g a it can be p h a or p v a that is either it can be a peak horizontal acceleration or vertical acceleration depending on what acceleration you are recording whether it is in the horizontal direction or in the vertical direction that is the peak value. But what is this sustained maximum acceleration it says that the acceleration which sustains for minimum 3 cycles suppose this value this value this value are same and they are remaining for at least 3 cycles. So, this value of acceleration will be 3 cycle sustained acceleration and suppose if it continues for 5 cycle say like this then we can say this as 5 cycle sustained acceleration that is the highest or maximum value which is continuing for at least 3 cycles or at least 5 cycles are known as sustained maximum acceleration corresponding to that number of cycles either 3 or 5. Now, let us look at this slide effective design acceleration what is that the acceleration which is effective in causing the structural damage that is called effective design acceleration or EDA. So, this is the minimum threshold acceleration at which the structural damage starts occurring this depends on size of loaded area weight damping and stiffness properties of structure and its location with respect to the epicenter. And what are the various suggestions like Kennedy in 1980 proposed that effective design acceleration EDA is as 25 percent higher than the 3 cycle PHA that is this 3 cycle sustained maximum acceleration recorded in a filtered time history filtered means in the acceleration time history record you have filtered out or taken out the noises that is known as filtered time history. So, in that time history typically it has been found so far that whatever is the value of that 3 cycle PHA or 3 cycle sustained maximum acceleration the 25 percent extra or if you multiply that value with 1.25 that will give you the design value of effective acceleration. So, that is the value of EDA which needs to be used for design. And Benjamin and associates in 1988 proposed that EDA as the PHA after filtering out accelerations above 8 to 9 hertz that is you should not take any accelerations which are having frequency value of more than 9 hertz. So, that is what they proposed that below 9 hertz frequency whatever acceleration time history record you have that is after filtering out 8 to 9 hertz above that frequency range whatever remaining acceleration time history record you have corresponding to that whatever peak horizontal acceleration you get that can be taken as EDA because as I said earlier that typically about 3 and half to 4 hertz is a typical range of damaging earthquake frequencies and with that range you will find that the recommendation is up to maximum 9 hertz you consider the frequency range to take the value of PHA which can be used as your design acceleration or effective design acceleration EDA. Now, let us come to the next important parameter that is after the amplitude we said that frequency content is another important parameter to quantify any earthquake. So, what are the frequency content related parameters let us see the frequency content of an earthquake history is often described by using Fourier spectra or power spectra and response spectra. So, these are the three spectra by which the frequency content of any earthquake can be expressed. So, ground motion spectra in terms of Fourier spectra how it can be represented let us see as we all know about the Fourier series in mathematics how it is applied to find out the frequency content of an earthquake we have to see over here. So, it is a periodic function for which an earthquake history is an approximation because we know that earthquake history is a random motion it is not a periodic motion, but you can approximate that random earthquake history motion into a periodic function which can be expressed in the form of a Fourier series. So, that is why the Fourier spectra is originated. So, what it says suppose the earthquake displacement x of t which is a displacement which is function of t can be expressed in this periodic format which is nothing but the equation of a well known Fourier series. So, C naught plus sum over n equals to 1 to infinity C n sin of omega n t plus phi n. So, this is expressed in this periodic function in terms of this sinusoidal function. So, where this C n and phi n these are nothing but the amplitude of your that Fourier function or the displacement function expressed in Fourier series term and phi n is the phase angle of the n th harmonic that is n th cycle of the motion in that Fourier series. And this is the initial displacement at the starting of your earthquake time history. So, this is the initial amplitude. So, after expressing the Fourier spectra what we can say about this that the Fourier amplitude spectrum it is nothing but a plot of that amplitude C n which is nothing but the amplitude of n th cycle. So, that n th cycle amplitude versus omega n. So, if we plot that C n versus omega n that will give us the Fourier amplitude spectra. So, it shows how the amplitude of the motion it varies with respect to the frequency. So, that is as the frequency changes how your amplitude changes with frequency variation that gives us the frequency content and it expresses the frequency content of a motion automatically. So, the Fourier phase spectra. So, this is the amplitude spectra another is Fourier phase spectrum.  So, that is nothing but your phase angle in the n th cycle of your earthquake cycle whatever phase you are getting that you have to plot with respect to that frequency of an earthquake omega n. So, phase angles control the times at which the peaks of the harmonic motion occur. Because you know from this plot of phase angle that is at what interval of phases this peak of earthquake motion is going to occur at a particular location. So, that is how it is not only giving this Fourier amplitude spectra the value of the amplitude, but it also gives from this plot of phase spectra that is at what interval that peak or the maximum will occur in this harmonic motion. So, the Fourier phase spectrum is influenced by the variation of the ground motion with respect to time which is quite obvious because that is the input parameter for you to derive at Fourier amplitude or response spectra. So, let us look at the picture how it looks like a Fourier amplitude spectra. Let us look at this slide the Fourier amplitude spectra of actual earthquake are often plotted on a logarithmic scale. Because why to plot in logarithmic scale? You can identify the intermediate small variation also if you stretch it in the logarithmic scale that is the advantage of using the logarithmic scale for any variation. So, these are often plotted on the logarithmic scale. So, that their characteristic shapes can be clearly distinguished from the smooth curve. So, as I was mentioning this y axis will be your C n, C n is nothing but Fourier amplitude in the n th cycle of earthquake n is particular cycle if you pick up and x axis is your frequency or omega n that is also in the log scale. So, this is in log scale this is as well in log scale. So, then a typical Fourier amplitude spectra will look like something like this. So, you will have a constant Fourier maximum amplitude which will range between two values of the frequency which are denoted here as f c and f max. Let us see what are those. So, these two frequencies that mark the range of the frequencies for largest Fourier acceleration amplitude these are called corner frequency f c and the cutoff frequency f max. So, these are the definitions of corner frequency that is the minimum value of the frequency at which the earthquake attains or reaches its maximum amplitude and what is the f max or cutoff frequency it is nothing but the maximum value of the frequency at which that maximum value of earthquake amplitude or Fourier amplitude sustains. So, this is the range with which your maximum value of your Fourier amplitude spectra will continue. So, in this case f c is a very important parameter why because it is inversely proportional to the cube root of seismic moment. Thus it indicates that large earthquake produce greater low frequency motions. So, that is the reason why we were mentioning earlier that what is the considered in literature the range of frequency we can take as per Benjamin and associates that up to 9 hertz of frequency we should take above 9 hertz frequency we generally discard below 8 to 9 hertz frequency whatever earthquake occurs the peak value of the horizontal acceleration we considered as the effective design acceleration for any structural design and more. So, because the low frequency motions they cause more damages to the because they are the large earthquake that I will tell you when we will compare this low frequency that means high time period why it is occurring and why it is more dangerous to tall buildings etcetera. So, it is a way related to the cube root of the inversely proportional to the cube root of seismic moment. So, automatically it gives you a kind of correlation between the seismic moment magnitude and the frequency content or the frequency value through this Fourier amplitude spectra. So, that is the use of Fourier amplitude spectra, but as I have already indicated it is approximated that random motion of earthquake has been approximated through this periodic function through use of this Fourier series Fourier series function. Coming to next type of spectra which is also used sometimes to express the or to obtain the frequency content parameter like it is called power spectra. So, what is power spectra? Power spectrum is a plot of G omega this is again another function which is expressed in the power spectra form versus omega n that frequency once again frequency of the earthquake. Remember this is not the natural frequency I am talking about this is the frequency of earthquake motion. So, the power spectrum density it is called PSD it is a function which is defined by the following equation this equation and it is closely related to Fourier amplitude spectra. So, similar to the Fourier series the power series is another form of the mathematical expression which can be used to express the earthquake response to obtain the frequency content. So, this is the function power function G omega G omega is can be written in the form of 1 by pi T D C n square. So, where this G omega is nothing but the PSD that is power spectrum density and T D is the duration of the ground motion that is nothing but time period time period or time duration of the ground motion which is related to your omega n of course, as we know omega n and T D is correlated like the time period and frequency is related and C n the C n is the amplitude that displacement amplitude of the n th harmonic in the Fourier series which we have already discussed while discussing the Fourier series spectra. So, this power spectrum density function is used to characterize an earthquake history as a random process. So, unlike your Fourier spectra where we have expressed that random process into a sinusoidal or a periodic function if we go back into that equation. So, that random behavior of an earthquake displacement is assumed to be as a periodic function through this expression of Fourier series in the Fourier spectra, but in the case of power spectra it only takes the maximum values of those or the amplitudes of those Fourier spectra and then express it is as it goes in the random process related to your variation of this earthquake frequency omega n which is expressed through this T D clear. So, here this is the only advantage is it need not to consider the periodic function it can be applied for a random process. Coming to the next or I should say most practically used concept of frequency content parameter is the response spectra. So, a typical response spectra is looking like this the y axis is the spectral response it can be a displacement it can be acceleration it can be velocity accordingly the name will change to as shown in this picture it is the acceleration response spectra because y axis shows the acceleration s a if it is the s v that is if it is the spectral response velocity then we call it as velocity response spectra. If it expresses the spectral response displacement then we call it as a displacement response spectra and what is plotted in the x axis x axis is nothing but the period period of ground motion that capital T. So, this variation typically gives a result like this that can be estimated for a particular value of your assumed damping constant we or damping ratio we will come to that derivation very soon. Let us see the basic definition a response spectra is used to provide the most descriptive representation of the influence of a given earthquake on a structure or machine and response spectra are widely used in the earthquake engineering because everywhere you will see later on that we are using for any design the response spectra of an earthquake motion. So, this is a way to represent the variation of earthquake random motion in more logical or understandable manner which can be further used for our engineering design for earthquake resistant design etcetera. So, a response spectra is a plot of the maximum response amplitude. So, that maximum response amplitude as I said it can be displacement or it can be a velocity or it can be an acceleration as you decide to express your y axis accordingly. So, that versus the time period of the system to a given component of a ground motion and using that response spectra peak response of buildings to earthquakes can be assessed and the natural frequency also can be determined using this response spectra. We will see its application extensively later on also we will talk about the various seismic design code including our Indian seismic design code where this response spectra is thoroughly used. Coming to this slide where again we are talking about the response spectra if you see here in this picture response spectra at two different site. One is a rocky site and another is soil site are shown here for the same particular earthquake and various response spectra are plotted the top one is for the acceleration response spectra SA in terms of G. So, these values are 0.5 G 1 G like that and this is also SA that is the acceleration response spectra in rock and in soil site. The second one the central one shows SV that is in the unit of centimeter per second. So, this is the velocity response spectra for rock site and this is the velocity response spectra for the soil site. The last one at the bottom one is the SD in centimeter unit. So, this is the displacement response spectra for the rock site and this is the displacement response spectra for the soil site. So, if you look here the typical values of the response spectra in the rock site this is a pretty high compared to the soil site whereas, the displacement if you look at here final we are talking about the displacement here for rock site it is pretty low compared to the soil site. So, response spectra nothing but these are widely used in earthquake engineering as I already said the response spectra describes the maximum response. It can be maximum displacement or maximum velocity or maximum acceleration. So, that is maximum response of a single degree of freedom oscillator. So, we have to use the single degree of freedom system to a particular input motion that is whatever earthquake input motion you have you apply that input motion to an idealized single degree of freedom mass spring dashpot system or MSD model which we have learnt in our another video course on soil dynamics. So, we will see here also how we can reach to a response spectra or the maximum response of a single degree of freedom system of a mass spring dashpot system or MSD model or spectra under a particular input motion. So, this will be considered as a random motion if you apply to a SDOF system how to solve that we will come to the solution very soon. So, as a function of the frequency and it is a function of the damping ratio because we were knowing whenever we are finding out the maximum response or the suppose it is maximum displacement we always expressed that maximum displacement as a function of the initial displacement or in addition to that we use the value of the damping ratio. The damping ratio was a very important parameter if you remember it was a function of nothing but damping ratio and what was the function another function frequency ratio if you remember that in our other video course on soil dynamics if you have seen that video course or have gone through that video course you will know that single degree of freedom system its response or if I want to find out its displacement at any point of time we it has to be expressed in terms of its static displacement or initial displacement and in terms of its damping ratio and in terms of its frequency ratio that is the applied frequency to the natural frequency of the entire system. So, the same thing we will see here also in subsequent lecture. So, the response spectra from let us have a look at this slide. So, the response spectra from two sides one rock and the other soil are shown in this figure as we can see over here. Now, let us see another parameter which is known as duration this is another important parameter out of those three to quantify any earthquake as I said three important parameters are amplitude of earthquake then frequency content of earthquake and then duration of earthquake. So, if we talk about the duration of an earthquake it is very important parameter that influences the amount of damage due to earthquake. So, a strong motion of very high amplitude of short duration may not cause as much damage to a structure as a motion with moderate amplitude with long duration can cause that I have already mentioned in my previous lecture that it is not necessary that a very large magnitude or amplitude earthquake will always cause a major damage. If it occurs for a very short duration it may not make large damage because the structure did not get enough time to respond to that large magnitude. Instead of that if we have a moderate magnitude of earthquake, but which is long lasting for a longer duration that may be more damaging to the structure because the structure gets enough time to respond to that to behave to that. So, let us look at here. So, this is because the ground motion with long duration that is the longer time for which it is lasting causes more load reversals that is once load is applied another case load is taken out that is the load reversal. So, if you make your structure to go through more number of load reversal that is once you apply load then taken out then apply then taken out. So, one cycle of load reversal as many as load reversal you will apply to a structure that will cause more damage rather than a single peak value which probably will not cause any load reversal to the structure. So, that is what it is showing over here if we look at this slide. So, which is more important in the degradation of the stiffness. So, more number of load reversal will cause more degradation of the stiffness of the structure and it builds up pore pressure in loose saturated soil. So, as well as what it does in case of our soil or geotechnical engineering in case of soil it builds up the pore pressure if that say favorable condition exist over there with number of more longer duration or more load reversal it generates more and more pore pressure which does not get time to dissipate. So, automatically that also creates a problems a liquefaction or a loss of effective shear strength which ultimately reduce the strength of your of foundation soil etcetera and of course, the structure reduces its stiffness due to this more number of load reversal. So, if you get a longer duration always that is a more damaging than a shorter duration earthquake. So, duration represents the time required for the release of that accumulated strain energy along a fault that describes the duration of the earthquake motion that is how much time it requires to release the entire accumulated energy during this earthquake process. So, obviously it increases with increase in the magnitude of earthquake because in high magnitude earthquake typically it will release more amount of energy. So, more amount of time typically will be required and what is relative duration this is another definition relative duration does not depend on this peak value the duration depends on this peak value, but the relative duration does not depend on the peak values. It is the time interval between the points at which 5 percent and 95 percent of a total energy has been recorded. So, that means it is the duration or the time which is recorded between this 5 percent of energy release to the 95 percent of the energy release. Let us look at the slide over here. So, this is the 5 percent energy release to 95 percent that is the time at which earthquake energy say total 100 percent 5 percent of that has been released up to the time up to which the 95 percent of the total energy has been released that this time to this time is called as the relative duration of an earthquake motion. It is not dependent on the peak value say peak value may come within the say it may happen within 1 first 1 percent or maybe later 99 percent, but that need not be considered as a duration though in duration it is mentioned as like that, but relative duration corresponds to this 2 amount of release of the total energy. Now, let us see another definition of another type of duration. Let us look at the slide. It is known as bracketed duration. What is bracketed duration? It is the measure of the time between the first and last accidents of a threshold acceleration. What is threshold acceleration? This threshold acceleration is nothing but a minimum acceleration which will cause damage to structure that is the minimum value of acceleration which will start causing damage to our structure which is typically taken by engineers as 0.05 g. So, that is the value of acceleration which is taken as minimum or threshold acceleration above which it is considered as a damaging acceleration which may cause damage to the structure. So, what the bracketed duration says if suppose your acceleration versus time profile looks like this. So, this is a random motion like this you have to look for in that acceleration time response or time history data basic data after filtering out of course, the noises etcetera wherever your value of that 0.05 g if you see the scale this is the 0 scale this is 0.5 g. So, you have the demarcation over here 0.05 g, 0.1 g, 0.15 g like that. So, you draw a line of 0.05 g in both the direction that is plus or minus because we are considering only the amplitude of it. Now, look at the acceleration time history profile where that first time it has touched that line you got it. So, suppose this is the value where it first touched that threshold acceleration of 0.05 g. So, this will be taken as first exceedance of the value that is beyond this it exceeded that value of 0.05 g clear. So, that will be starting time again all these are see above 0.05 g and it need not be always that everything has to be 0.05 g in all cycle. If you look here very carefully see in this zone where I am showing here through this cursor here it is still below 0.05 g, but you have to still consider and look for the value where beyond that there is no 0.05 g is occurring you got it that is the last exceedance of that value of 0.05 g. So, that time is the last point of time which has to be considered. So, this time to that time this duration is called as bracketed duration which is important for our civil engineers to design any structure whether substructure or superstructure under earthquake condition. So, this bracketed duration is having a huge amount of application because of his consideration above this threshold acceleration limit. So, that is the time period we are more concerned about suppose it may longer for more time here if you see it is probably between 2 seconds to about 12 seconds. So, bracketed duration for this earthquake motion which is shown in this picture is about 10 seconds whereas, the total earthquake duration may be considered as say if you consider these values also may be up to 29 this is 20 about 20 seconds or so. So, though the total earthquake duration is 20 seconds, but bracketed duration which is more important for us as a civil engineers are 10 seconds that is what I wanted to point it out here over here. So, this is another example where it is shown the acceleration time profile and this is the first accidents this is the last accidents of that point 0 5 g value whether it is plus or minus and that difference of time gives you the bracketed duration of this earthquake motion whereas, the actual duration may be pretty long like say 25 seconds or something like that. So, with this we have come to the end of this lecture we will continue further in the next lecture.


Okay, we're back with John Shimoni, who is the CSO of Dell Technology. The S there stands for security. John, welcome. Good to see you. Thanks for taking time. Thanks for having me. Yeah, you bet. You know, you've had what I'll call a richly textured career, both in the public and private sectors. You know, the audience, I want to share with them. You were with Sony for the now infamous cyber attack that was nearly a decade ago, which was kind of a combination of ransomware and what I would consider as sort of a blackmail to take down a film that, you know, hacker group didn't like, but from a cybersecurity landscape standpoint, what do you see is sort of the same and what has changed since then? Yeah, I appreciate, first of all, I appreciate the characterization of richly textured. I may have to borrow that. That's the most polite way to speak to a brief victim I've ever heard. So that's nice. And yeah, it's, you know, it's close to ransomware. As we know ransomware today, when we think about the Sony attack, which happened, you know, about a decade ago, but it wasn't ransomware, really.  In the case of a Sony attack, it was just a pure destructive cyber attack. You know, no real ransom involved in how we think about it today. And it's just somebody walking up and punching you in the face. And in this case, an entertainment company, which back then is really just quite unprecedented. So when we think about how the landscape has shifted since then over the last decade, back then, again, significantly unprecedented. If you're an entertainment company, you're not necessarily thinking daily about ransomware and many other industries alike. Today, it doesn't matter what industry you're in. Ransomware is so prevalent. It's really plaguing all industries with the top risk concern for businesses of all breeds. And so a lot's changed in the last decade. At the same time, a lot remains the same. If we think back a decade ago from a cybersecurity best practices perspective, a lot of the best practices then are still best practices today. And honestly, 10 years from now will probably still be best practices. And businesses and organizations broadly still remain challenged in many cases to implement those best practices. Incidentally, a decade ago, almost always took advantage of stealing people's passwords, identities, credentials, particularly privileged accounts that exist within the network in order to get broadly into people's networks and do damage. The same remains today. If we look at most incidents that are taking place in 2023, identity still remains the epicenter of most incidents. And even as we think forward a decade from now, I imagine that probably won't be too different than what we're seeing today. Well, no question. Gen AI and the momentum around Gen AI is new. AI is not new, but what's your point of view relative to the impact of increasing threats versus those defending against the threats? Who's got the advantage in your view? I think it's too soon to tell. And I think it's a fair statement to say I'm tremendously excited about the potential of AI and what it might reach in terms of benefits for the security industry and cyber security practitioners like myself. Another true statement though is that it terrifies the heck out of me. And so the real question, the strategic question, which again, I don't think we can answer today, only time will tell is net net, what is the impact 10 years, 20 years from now on our ecosystem? Does it help more or does it hurt more? What I would say is I reflect on the current asymmetry that exists in the security landscape. There's a significant asymmetry between the offense and the defense. The defense is losing broadly if you look at the scoreboard. And that hasn't changed over the last decade. And so just like in the sports game, when you're down a lot, you need to pass a Hail Mary. You need some type of disruptive event to potentially right the table. I get excited about the prospects of AI and what it could potentially do, the right that asymmetry that exists. There's a nearly tremendous potential for security teams broadly to leverage the power of the technology to become more efficient, to become more effective. In simple terms, when we think about the security space, a lot of what security is trying to do on a daily basis is punch through this massively complex chaotic case act to find the needle and to find humans capable of doing that in industry where we're short millions of qualified humans. So by the very nature of the problem that we're trying to solve, it's really right for the potential of where AI can potentially provide tremendous benefit. So I'd like to look at the optimistic side of it and be really excited. At the same time, when I think about the same excitement that criminals and don't only have right now as they look at the technology, look in their lips, they're thinking through the same things. How can we amplify the efficacy, the efficiency of our criminal operations? How can we become quicker and better? And so that's a real concern that organizations probably need to contend with and make sure their teams are considering. Yeah, thank you for that. One of the things that my sense anyway that has also changed is, when you think about the Sony hack, when you think about things like Stuxnet, there was what I'll call the dwell time, the time that the adversary was in, doing sort of traversing and exfiltrating. And now it seems like the in and out time, I don't know, there's probably a term for that, seems to be compressed quite dramatically. So speed is really important. So as you look into 2024 and beyond, what do you think the major focus should be for organizations and practitioners that are trying to improve their security posture? Yeah, it's a great call out. I mean, speed and your time is a really interesting element in the security game. It's one that matters. And first, again, looking at the scoreboard, the defense is doing better, measurably. There's plenty of studies out there that are measuring how quickly we on the defensive side can detect and contain intrusion year over year for the last half a decade at least that's been improving. How quickly can we patch and fix vulnerabilities, patch time and speed to remediate issues when we find them, even before an incident takes place, been improving. At the same time, if we look at the speed of criminals and other threat actors, their speed has also been improving. And going back to the AI conversation, as we think about what the potential is for cybersecurity and cyber criminals in AI world, one of the most terrifying prospects of my mind, honestly, is that speed could get down to milliseconds. Today, we count cybersecurity operations and days, weeks, sometimes months. But realistically in the future, it's foreseeable that cyber attacks could literally just be code coding code, that code running on its own at the speed of light in higher incidents that historically took place over the course of weeks, happening literally at the speed of light and the defense having to contend with that, inherently always being on the reactionary side. And so again, it's a tremendously exciting time, I think to be in this industry, to be in this space, it's gonna require even more creativity and even more focus if you're on the defensive side. But this new technology just definitely has some significant implications. That said, that's probably years out, that's not tomorrow. So when you start asking like your question, what do we think about in 24? I think one of the elements that we all need to be thinking about is in 2024, I would bet that not a single organization, any of us we talked to would say, I am perfectly happy with where I'm at and I've done all I can possibly do from a cybersecurity perspective. So inherently it's a discussion, a question, and prioritization. What should be done in day one in 2024? What should be done in quarter two? What's the next most urgent priority? And thinking through those priorities, not just necessarily taking a playbook about practices off the shelf from a website or an advisory agency, but actually deeply understanding your business, your organization model, what is the different right answer or priorities for a technology provider versus a manufacturing organization versus potentially a school that requires increasing focus analysis and not just security expertise but actually business expertise and importantly a close connection between those two sides. Yeah, so a couple of things that I would call attention to for our audience, your earlier comments strike me as you've got, obviously you've got to now worry about stopping the breach at the same time, you've still got to worry about recovering when they get in, likely they are going to get in. And we often talk about the adjacency of data protection to the broader sort of cybersecurity protocols and procedures. And it seems to be some debate in the community over the course of this series where my perspective has been it's, data protection has often been a bolt-on or an afterthought. Others have said, oh no, it's got to be a fundamental component. I think everybody agrees that data protection backup and recovery should be a fundamental component of a cybersecurity strategy. What's your perspective on how those two areas intersect? First, I mean, data backups have always been a core part of the main security program. We think about cybersecurity, we think about not just protecting the confidentiality of information systems, but also the availability of the networks and the data that organizations need to leverage. I think what has changed significantly over the years with just this onslaught of ransomware and the behavior we're seeing from ransomware groups is that the industry has really shifted from a traditional data backup mindset culture to the processes and technologies where they're really oriented towards a single database going down, a single application. At worst, maybe a single data center if a weather event comes in. And in the strategies, now you've contended with the reality that with a ransomware attack, you're likely to see your backup environment purposely targeted, actually having sophisticated actors coming in.  And today what that means is coming into your backup environment and doing as much damage as possible to all of your data, to all of your systems, including your backups. And so, as we think about 2023, certainly 2024, a modern resiliency strategy, not just a backup strategy but being resilient, first and foremost means making sure your backup environment accounts for that. That you have your data immutable, that you have your most critical data isolated, that you've got intelligence and security intelligence built into your backup environment from a monitoring visibility perspective. But then the second part is actually being planful and recognizing that if that type of day could happen to anyone, and if that day happens, it's not just about whether you have your data, it's actually the readiness to restore with speed. I mean, that's that speed conversation. You know, the difference between survival and just a bad day for many businesses may be whether you can bring all that, bring an entire business worth of data back online in the course of days versus weeks or months depending on the level of preparedness. So data backups are more central than ever to the importance of a cybersecurity strategy. And as we look back and think where have the priorities been, again, as you set your priorities and best within a cyber program, I would say, you know, five, 10 years ago, you would talk to more practitioners that may have more percent of their investment portfolio focus being on protection and detection. I would say the opposite today is true. Everybody's talking about response and recovery and being able to recover quickly and they can show you have the technology evolved and then the process needs to get back online if you find yourself in that day. Yeah, and, you know, of course, we always talk about the complexity of cyber, the tools creep and how to deal with, you know, the latest and greatest, you know, practice and the different types of threats. But cyber used to be the domain, as you well know, of the deep best SecOps pros. And of course, then it became a board issue and now it's, I call it middle out, meaning everyone in the organization is responsible for better security and increasingly, they're aware of those responsibilities. I wonder if you could comment. One of my favorite, you know, stories is from Lena Smart is the CSO at MongoDB. And she says her approach for cultures to put those deep SecOps pros in the same room as folks who know nothing about it, you know, the business line people or some of the back office people and say, okay, talk about your worlds. As she says, you know, that kind of interaction, it creates empathy for, you know, each side and they learn from each other. How do you create a security culture? Yeah, I think mutual understanding and communications is essential. You know, the nature of security programs is at the end of the day, you're kind of set rules. You're going to have to tell people what the rules of the road are and ensure that you're enforcing it.  What are you trying to do? And then I think you have to have empathy. I would agree with that to actually get inside the lives and the minds and the challenges of those who have to, you know, help be part of the broader security team and essentially by following the rules that you're setting or joining the extended security team and helping across the company do the right thing every day, regardless of the role, whether you're an engineer, whether you're an HR professional or what it may be. And so from my perspective, we're communicating constantly with our employees at Dell almost a weekly basis. We're sending employee-wide communications on the topic of security and not just saying what to do, but why, you know, sharing awareness of what the issues and concerns are and not doing security for security's sake, but almost everything we're communicating that is through the lens of how we're protecting our company and how we're protecting our customers, which at the end of the day is the thing that we all collectively care about and can rally behind. And then at the same time, we're constantly looking for feedback on our initiatives and more creative ways to achieve our outcomes. And so from that perspective, we're seeking to launch incentive programs and we literally have awards programs where we will award employees, our non-security professionals awards for finding creative ways to get at our security goals and help protect the company and our customers through ways that maybe the security team wouldn't have seen because they sit in a difference of the shoes and have a diverse set of perspectives. So let's talk about Dell a little bit.  You've got an ecosystem of partners that help better defend, but how do you think about managing the complexity and diversity of those piece parts so that the customer outcomes can actually be improved? Yeah, well, I would say first and foremost, we've chosen to take a very different approach than probably many technology companies and security companies where, you know, those you hear talking about security and trying to sell security to customers. And we view at the end of the day, ourselves as a technology company and when that comes a responsibility obligation, but also an opportunity to be a secure technology company. And that's very different than being a security technology company. You know, we're not at the end of the day looking to solve the cybersecurity space by just creating more and more security technologies and selling what is essentially band-aids to patch on top of technology, recognizing ourselves as a widely deployed technology provider that's supporting organizations of all shapes and sizes across the globe. We have a responsibility and opportunity to just make that technology increasingly more secure and resilient so that it needs less band-aids. And so that's our real play and opportunity in the area we're most excited to help our customers with. At the same time, I would say we also take a different approach from a partnership viewpoint and most organizations, when they're talking about security and you're seeing the marketing if we've got the solution, buy our solution and you will be secure, buy our solution and this is your trust, buy our seclusion and this is a silver bullet. We have a perspective that nobody holds all the keys to this kingdom. You know, nobody can solve it on their own. It's only through really a broader ecosystem for the partnerships and teamwork that we can provide more meaningful outcomes for our customers. And so with that in mind, we're designing our technologies to be inherently more interoperable to provide security outcomes for security practitioners that may be leveraging them but also to be aware horizontally of the environments in which we're being deployed and to recognize that there's gonna be other technologies in and around the Dell technologies that are out there and that we need to do our part but it's not, you know, the whole part and where possible to be good stewards and to bring leadership to the community. And one example of this is with Project 4.0 where we've actually marshaled the efforts of over 30 different companies to come together to provide a collective set of outcomes that meet the zero trust standards of the US Department of Defense. You know, it's through this type of teamwork that I think we'll really start getting at making a broader impact on this problem space. Okay, last question. So let's say you have somebody that you're mentoring. You're pretty young, but let's say you got a young person that you're mentoring. And they just got anointed as the chief security officer of a fairly large firm. What would be the number one piece of advice you would give that fellow CSO about presenting to the board? How should that individual communicate to the board? What should be her or his main messages when communicating to a board of directors of a public sector or commercial organization? That's a great question. And it's one that often honestly is discussed with a lot of anxiety and fear by people who might be stepping into their first CSO role. So it is a conversation I've had. And I think the common misperception we see is that boards of directors are there to operationally engage in the details of whatever issues you may be managing in your space. And interestingly, we see board members potentially as confused about this. When they know they need to be doing something about cybersecurity, it's the hot topic. It's the biggest risk they hear about, but what is it? You know, I counsel to step back. I mean, the purpose of a board largely is to be there to provide a duty of oversight and to help ensure oversight of the management team of the company's management of the company, not to manage the company themselves. And so the best way to CSO or CSO can engage in that environment really is to help translate, help contextualize management efforts, help contextualize the risks relative to the business that they're responsible for overseeing and to build confidence that collectively the management team is doing or isn't doing the right things relative to managing those risks. And at the end of the day, ensuring there's a very tight alignment between the tolerance for risk-taking in this space, which is never going to be zero. Every company has cybersecurity risk to some degree, but making sure there's a very tight alignment between what the reality of that risk is and what the management team in the board believes that risk should be. And so the stewardship of that connection at the end of the day is the role that CSO should be playing as they engage with the board. And their best suited to do that is long and taken at the same time, not just be a security expert, but make sure they maintain a deep understanding of the business that they support. Great framework, excellent advice and how you should think about that. I wanna thank you, John, for your time and participating in the program. Yeah, great for you. Thank you again for having me. You bet. Okay, you're watching Navigating the Road to Cyber Resilience, the summit made possible by Dell Technologies. We're live and on demand from our Palo Alto studios. Keep it right there. We're right back.