Hello, I'm Nicholas Thompson, I'm the CEO of The Atlantic. It is my great pleasure to be here with Susan Wojcicki. She is the CEO of YouTube, we'll be talking about YouTube's crazy last year, we're talking about global governance, we'll be talking about this information, we'll be talking about how Susan spent much of the pandemic with five children at home, which is as heroic as running YouTube at this moment. So, hello Susan, how are you doing? Hello, how are you? Thank you. I am doing well. You're good. Good to hear. Well, first of all, I just want to say thank you so much for having me and thank you to WEF for hosting this event, and thank you to the government of Japan for hosting these global technology summit conversations, I appreciate it so much. So I just wanted to say thanks to everyone for making it happen. It is great that we get to do this, even at this crazy time. So, let's jump in, I just want to ask you a little bit about YouTube in the past year because we've all been locked at home basically watching YouTube, right? We started watching videos on how to make hand sanitizer and then videos of how to do arts and crafts, we didn't go crazy. Tell me the most surprising thing that you've learned about how people watch YouTube during the pandemic. Well, first of all, I'll just say I never thought that we would have so many hand washing videos. It was featured on the Google homepage and that's something I really could never have predicted. But I mean, I just saw and I felt it was a huge responsibility for us with the pandemic to be able to be, I felt like we were such an important link for people to all kinds of information, whether people were at home, they needed to connect to whether it was a religious organizations or social groups or we saw musicians who came out and did big concerts, we saw bands come and post historic coverage of concerts. It was just so important way for people to connect and learn. And, you know, one of the things probably that surprised me the most, which was really your question there, Nick, was how important we became in distributing COVID-19 information. And we immediately saw the role that we played and we just were we had everyone working at full capacity. So we served hundreds of billions of impressions of COVID information related to ways to that came from different health organizations. And we also made sure that we had playlists. We had to implement a whole bunch of new policies. But we really saw the critical role that we played in health. And that was the first time and working with health organizations. We worked with over 85 different health organizations. And it was really the first time that we worked so closely in the health field with so many different organizations for something that was global in nature. It's very interesting. And in fact, it leads right into the news from today. So as some people who are watching may know, YouTube made an announcement maybe three or four hours ago about violative content, basically measuring the amount of content that violates YouTube's standards. And one of the standards you can violate is misinformation about COVID-19. So the question I want to ask about that is this new report is out. There's transparency. That's wonderful. The amount of content that people view that violates your policy is quite low. It's 17 views out of 10,000. Is that correct? Yeah. Yes. It's it's approximately somewhere between 16 to 18 for 10,000 views. So that means with my children, that means we probably see 16 to 18 a day. But the question I want to ask is of the different contents of category that you are screening for, where you have policies that could be violated, hate speech, nudity, terrorism. What remains the hardest category to identify? They're all difficult in different ways. You've used machine learning to knock the numbers down. What is the one that machine learning still has the hardest time with? Well, first of all, I just want to say, I think it was really important milestone in terms of what we announced today, because we have been asked many, many times by governments, by press, by advertising creator community about this violative rate. And we were able to show exactly how good we are at enforcement of our policies. Right. So we were able to show that we have a very high ability to find this content and show exactly what that number was. We were also able to show that we were able to reduce it significantly over time. So if you look at where we were in 2017, at the same time of the year, we've reduced this more by then 70 percent. And that is due to an incredible amount of hard work with machines and also improving our policies. So not only did we significantly remove content that violates our policies at that significant rate, but we also created a lot more policies that we had to remove. And I mean, I would say the machines are good. We can find content across the board. But, you know, something like hate speech or something that has a lot of context would be something that would be harder from a machine standpoint to be able to detect. But in the end, we've been able to really fine tune our machines so that we can find a lot of this content. And it is flagged, but it doesn't necessarily mean that it's removed. So what happens is the machines will flag it and then it will be sent to human reviewers who will determine whether or not this is, in fact, violative or not. And they catch is one of the one of the complexities here is that this is content that violates your policies. It's not content that violates my policies or that fits some government's definition of hate speech. So a critique that someone could make is this is just what you think is bad content. There's nothing to do with what I think is bad content. How do you respond to that? I'd say there are two different conversations. So the first one is for you and I and governments and everyone else. Everyone, everyone seems to have an opinion about this, about what is the good content, what's the bad content, what should be up, what should be down. So we engage with many different groups across many different topics. And I'd say that's one conversation. But then we post very clearly and we say this is the content that we have decided is violative of our platform. We posted on our community guidelines and then that's a different question, which is, well, how good a job do you do at removing that content once you've identified it? And so this report that just came out showed exactly where we are, which is a 99.85 percent, depending we have a little confidence interval, which is why we have the 16 to 18 range in 10,000 views. So it's our goal is to break that into two different conversations, first, what the policy should be. And then do we do a good job enforcing them once we have those policies? Right. That makes a lot of sense. Let's shift to the question of good content, right? So sometimes there's, you know, there's there's all kinds of interesting content that you regularly in different ways, right? There's bad content, which you try to get rid of. There's borderline content, which is stuff that doesn't violate your policies, you try to downright that. And then there's the content that we sort of want to see. And there's also the sort of this fourth category of content. We're really happy we saw it. So if I spend an hour on YouTube and I surf through YouTube and I follow the recommendation algorithm and I watch a lot of sport videos. And maybe I see the late night comics at the end of the hour. I feel that was fine. If at the end of the hour, like I can solve a Rubik's cube because the YouTube algorithm has pushed me in like super interesting directions and figured out that I've always wanted to solve a Rubik's cube, then I'm thrilled. How do you think about incentivizing not just kind of run of the mill sugar, not bad, but like the really good stuff? Like, what's the exact inverse of the violative content? I think one of the things I've learned working in information since I've been at Google for over 20 years is the broad range of interests that people have. Information is incredibly diverse. And what a lot of people love about YouTube is they can say, I went and I found this specific video that I used to watch when I lived in this foreign country, you know, far away 40 years ago and I found it on YouTube, or I had to fix something that was very specific in my house and I could do that on YouTube. So first of all, it's really hard to say this is a content that is really great. I think you started talking about educational content. You implied with the Rubik's cube that that educational content had this higher premium. I'd say educational content is incredibly important to YouTube and that everyone, almost everyone comes to YouTube to learn something. In fact, we just had this episode study that said over 77% of people said they came to YouTube to learn something. And just anecdotally, everyone tells me how they fix something in their house. But I think, you know, what you're bringing up is one of these challenges is what is considered good content. We do classify when it comes to information, authoritative content. So if you're looking for COVID information, we actually can say, look, you know, the health organization, your local health authority, the CDC or whatever country you're in or the World Health Organization, those are organizations that we can trust as opposed to some channel that just showed up that we don't have any kind of authoritative information about. So we definitely have a concept with information about authoritative sources and we make sure that when people are looking for information that is sensitive, that we show those authoritative sources. But if you're in the entertainment area or you're looking how to fix something or how to learn something on a skewer topic, it's really hard to put some judgment about what is the best content that's out there. Right. So on authoritative content, that makes sense because you can just label that if something is labeled as authoritative, you can boost it. We did not just label it like, I mean, we have different we have a more sophisticated algorithm in terms of how we identify that. And we also are working on a global component, but we definitely do raise it and we've done a lot of work in the last year to identify sensitive areas and make sure that we're raising authoritative sources on that information. Yeah, that makes sense. And by the way, when Susan speaks about fixing things, I was listening to a podcast of hers this morning where she talked about watching a YouTube video to learn how to fix her 3D printer, I believe, which I thought was a wonderful anecdote or she, anyway, I thought that was a delightful story about how one one can use one can use YouTube. The last time we spoke, which was at her last time we spoke in public, which was at South by Southwest. You introduced a new concept very much related to this, which is that when conspiracy information is shown, you would, you know, show a panel with authoritative information and you would lead people to Wikipedia. Tell me how this has evolved over the last two years. Sure. So, yes, we met almost what? Two and a half years ago, 2018, and I told you three years ago. Yeah, three years ago. And I told you that we were going to do label content. And at the time that was a new idea. No one, I don't think we had actually rolled it out or we were just in the process of rolling it out. And that became something that we now refer to as information panels. And those information panels have become incredibly important. I'd say they're a serious workforce in making sure that people have the right information and that we can use to counter misinformation. So I'll give you a few examples. We certainly have used that on all the coronavirus information. So if you look at something COVID related will link to all different kind of health information, health authorities, depending upon what country you're in, all kinds of common conspiracies will link that for election integrity. We use that in COVID. We serve hundreds of billions of impressions that were different information panels. So we've come a long way, Nick, since we first met. And I'm hopeful that our VBR is also the start to something really important, which is more transparency and just an enhancement of our transparency report to understand how we think about violative views. Well, I wish we'd been able to announce the transparency report on this. I'll do better next time. I'll work on that. Okay. Thank you so much. It's very important to be able to bring these things live at the forum. So one of the things that to me is most interesting about the algorithm and we wrote a long piece of wire at my previous job as the editor of Wired about the way the algorithm had evolved. And one of the things that's so interesting is that every time you make a change to solve one problem, there's some kind of an unintended consequence. There's something that you then have to catch up to. There's some way that behavior has changed. So there's some new thing that is incentivized. Tell me how you think about the evolution of the algorithm right now, where it is right now. What are the key things you're prioritizing and trying to fix? And what are the things you're worried about? Sure. I mean, I think we've come a long way in our algorithm. I mean, ultimately we want to give information and suggest videos to our users that we think they're going to enjoy and want to see and related or to their interests. But there's a lot of caveats to that too. So first of all, as I mentioned, when we deal with information, we want to make sure that the sources that we're recommending are authoritative news, medical science, et cetera. And we also have created a category of more borderline content, where sometimes we'll see people looking at content that is or will be content that's lower quality and borderline. And so we want to be careful about not over recommending that. So that's a content that stays on the platform, but it's not something that we're going to recommend. And so our algorithms have definitely evolved in terms of handling all these different content types. I'd say that the plus of that is that our users are able to see higher quality content. They're also able to, we're able to make sure that they're getting information from sources that are very reliable. But I would say the con of potentially some of these changes, because as you pointed out, every change has some downside, is it maybe harder in some cases for channels, maybe who are getting started or smaller to be able to be visible when there is a major event or when people are looking at something that is science or news related. But I would say that that's a trade-off that we've made because we've realized that it's really, really important. So like we learned this lesson the hard way. So when we had the Las Vegas shooting, unfortunately, there were a lot of people who are uploading content that was not factual, that was not correct, and it's much easier to just make up content and post it from your your basement than it is to actually go to the site and to be able to report and have high quality journalistic reporting. And so that was just an example of what happens if you don't have that kind of ranking. So sure, we want to enable citizen journalism and other people to be able to report and other people to be able to share information and new channels. But when we're dealing with a sensitive topic, we have to have that information coming from authoritative sources so that the right and accurate information is viewed by our users first. And that's that's not an easy trade-off. I mean, your name is YouTube.  Or that was the founding principle. I would imagine that this is a trade-off that did not come like this. So it's yeah, it is. It it I lost you on the last second. They're broke up a little bit, but you're right. Like we came from YouTube and YouTube when YouTube first started, it was much more entertainment. It was much more focused on creating like interesting things that you saw. Funny videos. Music has always been really big on YouTube. And you definitely want to be able to break the latest artist. And so that's something that we need to think about. So when there's a new, you know, we have so many artists who got started on YouTube. So when we have our next, I don't know, some kind of some famous artists like Shawn Mendes or Justin Bieber who got started on YouTube and they post their video, we want to be able to enable those new artists to break. But if you look at that, breaking artists or discovering the new latest small musician is very different. If you're looking for something like cancer information, you don't want to see someone who is just posting information for the first time when you're dealing with cancer. You want to see it from established medical organization. And so what we've done is really fine tune our algorithms to be able to make sure that we are still giving the new creators the ability to be found when it comes to music or humor or something funny or so many different categories. Beauty, crafts, learning, how to write all these different areas, but we're dealing with sensitive areas. We really need to take a different approach. Let's move into the governance question of this, since that is a big part of the forum today. Tell me, clearly there's a lot of conversation in the United States, but elsewhere too seen in Australia. There's a lot of conversation about regulating the big social platforms. You are, I guess, lucky or maybe unlucky that you haven't had to be subjected to a seven hour grilling in front of Congress, but congratulations on avoiding that. Tell me one idea or one idea that has traction for governing YouTube that you think is a terrible idea. And tell me one idea that has traction that you think is a reasonable idea. Oh, I mean, look, first of all, I want to say that I understand where governments are certainly coming from. And we see government, we see so many different perspectives across governments. And I'd say, generally, we're really aligned with the overall approach. So we see governments who, of course, we want to keep kids safe. We want to prevent violent extremism on our platform. We want to keep our community safe.  We're working incredibly hard to figure out how can we work to do everything we possibly can. I'd say the challenge becomes when we get regulation that's very broad and is not well defined. So something that is harmful, like what is hate? What is harmful? Those are not things that are easily defined. And there are many, many different interpretations on that depending upon what you're handling. And so I'd say the challenges we have is when we have overly broad regulation that requires us to potentially remove a lot of content that would not be good in the end for our users. And I'll say there's a lot of regulation right now that's happening where people are, I mean, we have this issue with what was Article 13 now? It's Article 17, the copyright regulation in Europe. And we were able to make a lot of work in terms of progressing it with policymakers. But that was a case where we were really, really concerned if it had gotten too far the way it had been written that we really would not have been able to enable so many channels on YouTube. So I get really worried about any kind of regulation that causes us to potentially take down large amounts of content that would hurt so many different creators. Creators are small media companies. They represent a lot of diverse voices. There are storytellers who need to be told they're creating a service with educational content. They're deploying jobs. And we just came out with all our GDP and job numbers, which are really impressive. So I worry always when I see regulation that would potentially cause us to hurt a lot of the growth that we've seen from the internet. And so I'd say we're aligned when it comes to keeping communities safe. We wanna do everything we can and we want the definition of the language to be tight enough that we can actually comply in a way that is clear. And then we also have to just be really careful about the unintended consequences of some of the copyright or even like section 230, like what could go wrong that could cause us to have to remove a lot of content that would be really devastating for the internet and for the creative economy. Do you feel like it would be possible to reform section 230 in a way that would still give you the ability to filter content and give you protection against the possibility to impose something offensive on your platform, but that would solve many of the problems that lawmakers have seen in that very antiquated piece of legislation? I mean, one of the challenges I have is that there are a lot of lawmakers who want us to remove more content and then a lot of lawmakers who want us to leave out more content. And so it's not really clear what is it that lawmakers wanna solve for in the first place? And that makes it really challenging to be able to address. And so I think there are many ways to be able to address what the objectives are and we'll certainly work closely with them to try to achieve those objectives. But right now it's not clear exactly what those objectives are. There seems to be a lot of disagreement about it. So until that's clarified, it's hard for us to figure out exactly what are the right next steps. But we'll be having, I think the, I would say the next steps are to continue talking about and continue to try to define that more clearly and come up with solutions that will keep communities safe, but at the same time will enable the creative economy and the jobs and the education and the huge amount of valuable media to continue to flourish and grow. And what is an example of legislation that you've seen internationally that you think of as sensible, balanced and within the proper scope? Oh, I mean, I think maybe I'll start with like, you know, the net DZ, the first version of it had some really clear language around how we handle hate content and the need to remove that. And that was something that we also agree that we wanna remove that type of content.  And so in many ways it was useful that we had done a lot of that legwork for net DZ. So that would be an example of regulation that was useful for us and we're aligned on that. I think, you know, there certainly are, there's more policy that's coming there and we are in the process of understanding that and working through that. But the first version was helpful for us and nobody, we don't wanna have hate on our platform. We wanna remove it and we wanna remove it quickly. So that was something that was, I think we were very aligned and we were able to work together on. Let me ask you a big global question which is that one of the most discouraging things to me about the world right now is the technological split between East and West, particularly between the United States and China. Do you see any path to reprosment? Do you see any way that ultimately United States and China are able to figure out the issues that divide them on tech and that YouTube actually is operating happily in China some number of years from now? Oh, I don't know. I mean, I'm not sure I'm the best person to ask about that because Google has never, I mean, Google operated in China for a really short time. And so I'm not sure that I'm the right person to answer that question. I just see what I see about YouTube is just the humanitarian good that we are. So I see us as a global public video library and that we have a huge amount of content that people can learn how to do anything whether it's skill or language or musical instrument you can research any kind of historical talk or you can see all the weft talks here on YouTube. You can see all the TED talks. And so a lot of times I just feel sad if there's a population or a group who can't access that and there could be many reasons for that there could be policy reasons but there also could be technological reasons people who don't have access or they're not connected to the internet or data is very expensive in their country. So I see the value of being able to offer this library and so hopefully in some ways there will be more bridges built in the future. Do you have a set of things that have satisfied would tell you that it's time to go back into China or is it so far off in the distance and so out of the question at the moment that you don't even have that punch list? It's not something I'm working on at all right now. There's so many other things that I am working on. So many areas that I'm focused on our product our innovation we launched shorts product I'm very focused on shopping enabling more shopping on YouTube. I'm also said that responsibility is my number one priority. And as you can see like we've made tremendous progress but there's still a lot more of work to do. So I'm very busy just making YouTube a better product. And I am very interested in seeing the violative content report and seeing whether you can get that number down from 0.15 to 0.17 down to 0.10. Last question, you know, you're in... Oh, I certainly will. I mean, I'll certainly say that's the goal of mine is that we continue to lower that number. And our team will continue to work on it and measuring it is always the first goal being transparent, measuring it. We also break down in our report just, you know, all the different ways like how it was flagged was it flagged by machines how quickly we took it down what was a category that was removed for. So I do think that the transparency that we have is a really big step. And what I like about this metric a lot is that it encompasses a lot of the questions that regulators had. So a lot of times they would talk about virality. Oh, you had a video, but it was got a lot of views really quickly. So all of that is encompassed in the violative video right DVR for people to be able to understand and all work that we do should bring that number down. Well, I hope that you bring that number down by becoming better at finding bad videos and not by lowering your standards, which would be another way to- No, actually we're raising our standard. I mean, that's the thing to remember is that we have significantly raised our standard. I mean, just look at 2020, we had 10 different regulations on COVID. We had a number of regulations around civil, around civics election integrity. So we keep raising the bar and we need to actually make sure that our enforcement is even better while we're raising the bar and that's a challenge. But we're also, we're staff now. We have the people, the policies, the technology in place. So I do see the opportunity for us to really continue to improve that over time. I'm just saying that as a new CEO, I know that KPIs can influence behavior in funny, funny ways. But I totally, I hear what you're saying and that sounds like exactly obviously the right way to do it. Okay, last note, we have about 30 seconds left. Tell me something, actually let me ask you this way. Are we gonna be watching YouTube more on AR or VR a few years from now? Oh, I'd say AR. I'd say by AR.  And I do think there's a lot of opportunity with AR in terms of modifying video, modifying creation of video, how we view videos. And I love VR, but it's been hard to get the headsets and the content and get that ecosystem started. And so until there's a real breakthrough, where one of them become a lot easier or cheaper, it's gonna be hard for VR. But it will happen. There will be that breakthrough and it will happen. So in the meantime, I think there'll be a lot on AR and AR can go a long way. It can, I think we're gonna see a lot of improvements with video, be able to improve our lives and have more tools with AR and have more fun. So I'm optimistic about the future there. All right, wonderful. Thank you so much, Susan Wojcicki. Let's all leave and go watch some high-quality content on YouTube. All right.


Here's a projection of the celestial dome as seen by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy probe factoring out all local and local group motion. The mapping preserved the relative sizes of the surface objects. The key observation is that the light fits the black body radiation curve perfectly. This gives us the temperature of the radiation today. It is 2.725 degrees. We know that at decoupling it was 3,000 degrees. So the temperature has been reduced by a factor of 1,100. So the universe has expanded by a factor of 1,100 times since decoupling. The black body radiation formula also gives us the number density of CMP photons. There are over 400 million of them in every cubic meter of space throughout the cosmos. This is a thousand times more than all the photons from all the starlight ever created by all the stars and all the galaxies for all the billions of years that stars have been shining. The CMP redshift tells us that the light we see now was only 42 million light-years away from our location when it was emitted. It traveled for just under 13.8 billion years to reach us and its starting location is now 46.5 billion light-years away, making the diameter of the visible universe 93 billion light-years. The Planck satellite measurements detected small amounts of temperature deviation. The image uses color to show variations from the average with blue for minus 200 millionths of a degree through green and yellow to red, which represents plus 200 millionths of a degree. That temperature deviation comes to one part in 100,000. These temperature deviations come from equally small mass density deviations in the plasma at the time of decoupling. We see large structures, small, even tiny structures, and giant structures. We even see structures within structures at every scale. In other words, they're quite fractal. These differences in the CMB are what led to large-scale structures such as galaxy clusters, filaments, and voids that we see today. For example, a very tiny spot of red on the surface of last scattering, representing a small decrease in mass density in that region, will have expanded 1,100 times to the size of the coma cluster today.


Pre-commissioning unit Gerald R. Ford recently conducted deadload testing of the electromagnetic aircraft launch system. This system is designed to expand operational capability and launching of all current and future carrier air wing platforms. USS Antietam and USS Mustin recently arrived in Sydney, Australia for a port visit. During the visit, sailors will have the opportunity to participate in community relations projects and interact with the people of Sydney. The Cure Sarge Amphibious Ready Group kicked off the Arg Mew exercise in the waters east of the United States. The two-week comprehensive exercise gives the group an opportunity to work together in preparation for their upcoming deployment. And finally, the Defense Travel Program Management Office launched an integrated lodging pilot program. The program provides quality government and commercial lodging at reduced rates. For these stories and more, visit Navy.mil.


You know, when you play 10 years in the league, and you give your heart and soul to a franchise, I only play for one team. And the 10 years that I played, I never missed a game, never missed a practice, and started every game. That team changed. It left Houston. And when you get to being an old man and you go back to the school that you went to high school and you're working in that school system, you're trying to tell kids about what you did for a living. And you got to prove to them, thank God for an internet. You're able to show those kids that that's what I've done. So when Amy reached out for us and reached out for the Houston dollars to give us a place and a home to share and more than that, she made me an honor, remember her ring of honor. That was such a blessing, the same thing I've always cherished. You always have my heart, and I always support her. Point, though, like the Colts have been the Colts after they moved. The Rams have always been the Rams. The Raiders have always been the Raiders. Did the team name change and all that, did that hurt you guys at the time? Well, you got to understand. For me, it did. I had hoped to be a Hall of Famer one day. And I was saying, there won't be no more Houston all that going in there. In my mind, I didn't know that they were going to carry it over to the Titans. So when the name change, it did have a million effect on me. It was bittersweet, but now it's all sweet because of what Amy's doing today. What would you like to be here, Robert?  What would you like to be here? I've been here just to be my third visit to Tennessee. And every time I've come, it's a little bit sweeter. For me to be here to see some of my old friends, y'all know what we've been under for the last two years, this COVID, my wife will let me out of the yard. So it was time for me to get out and visit some of my old friends and share some of these good memories and to make new friends. Because there's a lot of old Houston all that where after I had left Houston, I didn't know doing like when the one moon got the earnings, griffons and all these guys, I didn't know them. So I want to get a chance to rub shoulders and share some memories and a whole lot of good stories with them. I feel blessed. I feel blessed because of I think some good things are gonna come out of this franchise. You know, I hate to put it out there on the limb, but you know, this franchise is gonna be something to deal with. I see a lot of good talent. They got good leadership. They got good coaches. They got good players. And you know, you got a couple people from my home town, from Alabama, that's doing a pretty good job. So, you know, it's a winning spirit here. I feel it. You know, they just do what the coach asks them. What's your relationship like with Amy? I guess, taking back to when she's maybe when you first knew her, you know, her daddy and to where it is today? Well, it's still from her mom and dad, bud and his wife.  When the mother reach out and to take care of your children, I feel like I'm a part of her family. She reached out to us and reached out to us to warm us to another new home. So, we may be allers, but I think we're gonna all die tightens. Sunday might not even know who Bum Phillips is. What do folks here need to know about Bum? I don't think it's gonna be too many people not knowing Bum.  He's got that swagger and he's got a winning tradition behind him with his son and he got a grandson that's coaching now at the Rams. It's gonna be easy. And we can also Google right now. Playing for him. I mean, how fun was that? Yeah, I don't understand. I come from a family where my mom and dad is still both living today. And if you look at, and that's my dad, this question, do you have a son? He'll say, yeah, his name is Robert Brzea, but he also considered Bum Phillips as one of his fathers. So, that's how, that's what it means to me having him as a father.


He's a really talented player, a young player. It won't be a drop-off when Darris come out the game. Whenever you get a bot in his hand, he's elusive with it. You know what it does, do it with it, so. AJ, I know you've kind of referred to Corey as sort of like your big brother from time to time. How rewarding is it to you to see him put everything together this season and be kind of putting up the numbers that he is and feel healthy and good about himself? We all go through stuff. Me watching him go through what he was going through last year and this season shows what type of person he is. I'm glad everything is coming together. I know we're not talking about the future, but I hope he's next to me next year when we play again next year. So I'm really glad to see him doing his thing. You know, I'm rooting for him. I'm trying to feed off of him as much as possible. It's like that bomb today. He got us going. And one other for the offense in general, I think that is stat that you guys are the ninth team in NFL history to have five straight games, at least 30 points, at least 400 yards. What's that say about how well the offense is clicking right now? It just shows everybody on the offense is special. Everybody can do their own thing and we bring a lot to the table. Most importantly, we're not really worried about that stat, but most importantly, we're trying to get the Ws in the end of the day. So we got to throw 30 points, 40 points, 50 points, and we most definitely going to try to do our best, try to pick each other up. Thank you. Tim? Hey, I think I've seen you do celebrations with Corey, probably Derek. I've never seen you do one with Ben Jones, who's centered before today. Tell me a little bit about that and how did that come about? I don't know. You just need to go watch, because me and Ben, we try to do celebrations every week. So it's probably just be cut out. But me and Ben, we always think about stuff. He come to me every week, like, what you want to do this week? So he came over down when he came. He said he wanted Michael Jackson, me and him are not dancers, so excuse how we look. But we just try to have fun with it. And when the offense is going like this, you played on a pretty explosive offense in college, too. But the way you guys are scoring points, 30 points, I think nine games, 40 points, four of those games, what's the confidence level like with this offense right now, and how much is it clicking? The confidence comes through the week. The confidence comes through the week. We build that momentum through the week, preparation, each and every day. So we've got a lot of confidence in each other. We feel like we can score at any moment. We feel like we're supposed to score every drive every time we get the ball. We just got all put together. Yeah, Jay, I'm just sure by now you know how much longer an NFL season can be where you have these kind of lulls and highs and things like that. But since you guys have been on the street, there was a couple of games prior that there were slow starts that were kind of bogging you guys down. What is it just as simple as taking what you're doing to practice to the field? And then that's kind of in the course direction. Most definitely, it's the NFL. Don't nobody know what's going to happen when we get out there. We can call it a right play, and they can dial up the right defense. But most definitely, man, it starts in practice just the preparation. And sometimes we get out to a slow start, but we just got to find a way whenever it's tough, whenever they call the right things. So don't nobody know how the game will go. We practice all week and don't know how it's going to go. But we still try to do the right things and prepare as much as we can. So just the NFL, don't nobody know.  How much has that kind of carried over and resurfaced with you and Corey as you guys are pushing for this 1K and also continuing to win games? We definitely feed off each other. We definitely talk making the most of every opportunity. But he's playing really good ball. He's been playing really good ball for all year. I'm definitely trying to, we're both feeding off each other. Like I said earlier, I'm really proud of him, because we both go through everything everyone does, but he's been going through some stuff. And it's good to see him finally get a break. And then with Coach Rob, he talked earlier this week about just, yeah, guys can get 1,000 yards receiving, but to do that on 50 or 60 catches, that's one that the yards after catches is really big and important. How much do you guys harp on that in that receiver run? I talk to him all the time. Just like I talked to him early in the game on the ball I caught earlier. Going across the middle, I stopped my feet. I should have kept running. I should have ran through the catch and got some yet. We talk about it, like we know Derek's going to do his thing. When he's hot, he kind of takes the ball out of our hand. So but we talk about most definitely making the most opportunity and making the play when our number gets caught. AJ, I know you've been playing great through the ankle. You feel like you're due for a weekend when you don't clip it somewhere on a sideline right and have to sideline right and have to shake it off during the game? To be honest, I mean, I feel like that's going to happen every game. I'm still trying to find a way I'm nursing it as much as I can. Doing anything I can to be ready for Sunday. But as a physical game, it's just a sport. Sometimes it's going to happen. I just got to keep going. I just walk it off.


Okay guys, quick story time.  Not only did he give all of the men and none of the women raises and promotions, but he's constantly belittling the women. And even admitted to me verbally that he gives women quote the easiest and least challenging responsibilities around the store, so what more do we want from him? When I complained to him about this, I was immediately taken off the schedule. And when I took it higher up, I was told that I didn't really understand the situation and that he would take care of it. Fast forward four days, I haven't heard back from him and he won't return any of my calls, texts, or voicemails. So I decided to get legal counsel and when I texted him that, he called me back immediately and told me I didn't know what I was talking about, that I was terminated over a minor dress code infraction previously. So I asked for proof of termination and I haven't received any. I've now missed five days of income and that's why I got a lawyer against Domino. When your man says he's hungry, you bring him a shot and food. This video is for the little f***ing boys who keep egging our house. You aren't them keep scrolling.  These hands don't discriminate, ages nine to ninety nine I will rock your s***. Listen. I don't think that's flammable. Well no, it's snow. What are you doing? I just want to melt it. Maggie, is everything okay with you? Well I got dumped on Snapchat. Asking the server for her number. What's your number? I'm sorry, I have a book now. Here, wash the dishes. Back by popular demand, my ex-wife is stalking me. I mean bringing me the kids. I have 20,000 followers on TikTok, 93% are female. Am I a lady's man now? Yes. Definitely. Definitely. What kind of hood rat stuff are you doing tonight? Picking up your children. Oh, right. Living with a guy check. Seriously. Hi guys, I decided to bring you guys along as I make my husband's lunch.  So that being said, I made him a peanut butter and strawberry jam sandwich. This was what he requested.  I'm going to put that in a reusable little ziplock style bag. So as a fruit, I'm going to incorporate an apple. This is just green apple. I'm going to peel it and cut it with a little apple slicer. And you'll see in a minute that I actually put this in a combination of two cups of water and two tablespoons of lemon juice. That way they don't actually turn brown. And I have tested this. It lasts for two days without turning brown. And it is amazing. As that sits in there for five minutes in the water and lemon juice, I'm going to add some peanut butter pretzels and some Annie's Graham characters to his snack container. Then I'm going to get the apples out, actually dry them out and put them in these containers from Dollar Tree. So up next is just packing the lunch bag. I'm adding everything in there and adding a bunch of snacks. So my husband does work up to 14 hours. So I add a bunch of snacks in there to get him through the night. I guess you could say. And then add in some peanut butter for the apples in case he wants it. Usually he doesn't use it. He did not use it with apples. But up next is his actual water cooler. So I'm going to add nine bottles of water and two Celsius.  So it's nice and cold. She thought I was a douchebag. Yeah, pretty much. And so I didn't reply. And then when he DMed me about the homework, I was like, oh, he just wants me to do all his work. Like, heck no. So I was going to try to catch her after class, but she sprints it out of the class every time, which I don't blame you because the class sucked. I knew you were going to try to talk to me and I was nervous. She was nervous. So I texted her or DMed her again, whatever. And I was like, don't only do this, blah, blah, blah, spit my game, whatever. And then I walked her back to her. I just started walking her back to her dorm after class. And hugging me. After the first time we talked and I was like, doesn't he like me? It was a little side hug.   Yeah, I gave it a little side hug. But yeah, we just hit it off and had some good combos. And then it just went from there pretty much. Hey, baby. Yeah. Spill you. Why are you? You forgot the D. There's no D in you. Now right now or there will be later.