What is going on guys welcome back to the channel critical overload here We're gonna be talking about Jeepers Creepers in this video here today So this will be more of the continuation of Alistair's proposed Jeepers Creepers 5 a true sequel to Jeepers Creepers 2 That picks up 23 years later It's centered on this the child of Minxy and Jack Tiger Jr. named Billy named after the brother Jack Tiger Jr. Lost at the start of Jeepers Creepers 2. We're gonna be picking up where we left off in the last video I'm probably gonna do a playlist dedicated to this story from Alistair So that way everybody can watch it in order But if you recall at the last video or in the last video I talked about Bucky getting a phone call from mysterious woman Warning him about the dangers on the train. So now we're gonna pick up from where I left off in that last video So elsewhere in Poho a woman driving down a highway stops at an isolated gas station It is eerily quiet. There is no sign of anyone. She finds the station is locked up and in darkness She tries to contact someone on her smartphone, but can't get a signal Chilling howls of animals are heard from nearby Frightened she tries to get back in her car, but none of the doors will open even though she left them unlocked. She sees Something moving behind the gas pumps and lets out a blood-curdling scream a police car Approaches the station and pulls over to Poho officers step out and investigate They find the woman's smartphone on the ground. They realize this is another abduction case The sixth one in the past hour one of the officers sees a sign at the shop window Saying the station is closed until the end of the month He does the simple math and says the station is closed for 23 days Everyone on the train has now moved to the front carriage with most of them terrified Erica is comforting Julie the distraught wife of Peter the passenger who vanished Louis the train conductors suggested they all get off the train and travel on foot down the railway line Saying it will leave them directly into Poho. He estimates is only a four-mile journey Erica reminds them about the farm that she believes is less than a mile to the east But Billy points out that's the direction of where Peter said he saw something in the field The passengers agreed to walk down the track Billy offers to stay behind on the train in case help comes Confused Erica asked him why he would want to be left on his own after what just happened Billy says because he's not afraid the conductor uses an emergency hammer to smash a carriage window While Billy isn't looking Erica picks his backpack off the floor and sneaks off with it into the next carriage She looks inside and finds a small plastic bag containing some kind of blade She takes the weapon out of the bag and looks at it in her hand It's it's one of the creepers hunting knives The same one used to pin Scotty to a tree in Jeepers creepers 2 in a split second The knife shoots out of her hand and hits the wall Louis is now outside. He looks underneath the train with his flashlight and several crows shoot out past him Much to his shock the crows fly off into the sky and it soon goes quiet again He tells the passengers to start climbing out the window one at a time a man can be heard Calling for help from nearby Louis shines his flashlight at the field but can't see anyone the unseen man continues to plead for help Julie says that's her husband's voice Billy enters the middle carriage in a shock to see Erica has found the knife Louis armed with a gun searches for Peter in the field and soon finds him crouching down beside some barbed wire Peter stands up and lifts his head to look at Louis in an unusual manner as if he's been controlled Speaking with a deep voice. He states you will listen to me only one of you holds my interests One of you has knowledge that can't that can serve me this one shall come to me or I will take all of you Peter's neck breaks and his body falls to the ground a shock Louis gasps and falls over or an almost falls over He hears something in the air. He shines his flashlight up at a tree But there's no sign of anything Billy is furious with Erica for looking in his bag But she demands to know what sort of knife this is she says he knows something that he's not telling her Billy reluctantly says my father gave it to me after my mother died He told me I might need it one day Billy reveals He knows exactly what is going on and what is responsible for the disappearance of Peter and the train driver Erica says he needs to tell everyone what he knows not just her Louis climbs back on the train and tells Julie her husband is dead He says Peter spoke to him, but it was not him. It was like it was someone else speaking Louis tells everyone what Peter had said Julie starts crying Billy says it was a message He asked if any of them have heard the story of East 9 one of the passengers says That was an incident that happened on a highway in Kinsle County numerous people vanished without a trace the story goes a creature of some kind with some huge wings stocked and killed those Missing people and a crazy farmer hunted it down and killed it for revenge another passenger says that was all made up Billy reveals it wasn't made up. It really happened that crazy farmer was his grandfather Billy says the creature that killed those people on East 9 highway was the same thing that killed his uncle The same thing that killed Dairy Jenner Everyone is shocked by this as they all know the story of Dairy Jenner Erica says Dairy was the college student who found the victims of the Portua killer in the basement of an abandoned church She says it's common knowledge that the killer murdered Dairy on a highway in Poho But his sister was a survivor another passenger says the police pursued the killer and shot him on the same night Dairy was killed Billy says there was no serial killer at least not in the formal sense He reveals there was a major cover-up by the Poho police to hide the truth The official story is that a deranged man drove around in an old brown truck and kidnapped and killed people But the Poho police knew the killer was not just a man and they did not kill it Billy believes he is the one who the creeper wants and says he will face it alone He is prepared to go out there if it means keeping everyone else on the train safe Louis offers Billy his gun saying it might come in handy Billy tells him to keep it He climbs out of the train and goes into the field waiting for the creeper to take him a crow appears on a fence Making a loud call Billy hears the sound of a galloping horse. He looks around, but there's nothing The hooves stop and the crow is gone Sensing something isn't right Billy heads back to the train and climbs back on board Suddenly the train begins moving forward he Erica and Louis runs to the driver compartment But there's no one there the train comes to a stop in the middle carriage where everyone else is Separate from the front carriage and begins moving in the opposite direction Billy Erica and Louis runs to the end of the carriage They are in and can only watch as the rest of the train moves away and disappears into the darkness Leaving behind only the fading screams of the other passengers something lands on the roof above them They hear the sounds of footsteps Louis is violently thrown down the hallway and hits a wall The lights begin to turn off and on Erica is lifted up in the air unable to move or speak the creeper emerges from the shadowy compartment and smiles Billy looks at Erica and realizes she is the one the creeper wants Billy walks towards it and reveals the knife Billy stares intently at the creeper for a moment and throws the knife as hard as he can at it The creeper jumps back into the shadows and vanishes as the knife impales him the entire carriage begins to shake Erica is released from the creeper supernatural grip Billy recovers the gun that Louis offered him and uses it to shoot a Window open he and Erica both jump outside and start running through the field Where they meet Bucky Billy Knowing who Bucky is tells him the creeper has returned Bucky says he knows the train carriage explodes Bucky leads the pair to his police car on a stretch of a road where they drive away Bucky tells them about the anonymous phone call he received at the residence of a missing man named Jules who has connections with Jack Taggart senior Billy says Jules is a friend of the family and a member of a team of men who swore to help Jack Defeat the creeper on the evening it would supposedly awake, which is two days from now Bucky says it has awakened earlier than they thought Billy says they need to drive to his grandfather's farm and That is how this chapter of my story for Alistair's Reports will conclude This is amazing Alistair. This is honestly just quite fantastic. Look at how this man has Explained how Poho has treated the events from 23 years ago covering it up lead putting out false false realities to the public Manipulate them into thinking it's something that they want to believe because of course you can't just say hey some demonic thing Took this boy. Look at all the cover-ups Look at the way he's weaving in the legacy the legacy cast with these new characters Look at how everything is very suspenseful Tension-based and you don't have a lot of the creeper being showcased. You're treating it the way it should be It's been 23 years that we're not seeing a lot of him He's been kept in the shadows you're building up to it And yeah, we're seeing some more of him towards the end of what I just talked about in this video But you're doing a fine job with this story Alistair. This is amazing Look at how everybody is familiar with Dairy Look at how everybody is familiar with a lot of this stuff that happened 20 years ago All this stuff is being integrated into the story so phenomenally and Anybody that's a talented writer that wants to do an appropriate sequel should be able to do no different if you're out there in Hollywood And you actually have real talent Let me know just think about this down in the comment section below if you're having already of course make sure you subscribe Turn on post notifications so you never miss a video in the description now have links on my social media accounts I am on facebook twitter and instagram you can message me there of course Let me know if there are any movies news or reviews you'd like me to cover in the future and with all that in mind guys I will see you in the next video


Seeing people turn to Bard and be like hey help me develop this idea so that when I do speak it out loud for the first time It's a much stronger idea more than anything. It's going to allow us to Understand a variety of perspectives that we might not have considered And I think that's a net benefit It's like ooh that might not have been the most brilliant idea that I've ever had you may have heard that googles New AI was apparently programmed to hate white people But did you know that it also has an affinity for pedos and woke directives for anyone that doesn't I say we take off and nuke The entire site for morbid you're definitely gonna want to hear about this over the past week Google's new AI named Gemini has received a lot of criticism for the fact It seems to be removing white people from history and just outright replacing them if you ask it for Vikings the founding fathers Or just white people in general you get black people in Indians when the left says that they want to end whiteness They aren't kidding AOC is quoted as saying it's more important to be morally right than factually correct It appears that Google operates on this same absurd premise It's not surprising when you see who the head of Google's AI program is a far left critical race theory infused foot soldier of DEI Which is just a commie way of saying he hates white people. Yeah He appears white, but it's been well established that the white left are the only group that actually hates themselves Because of their skin color. These are the folks that make up the social media and tech world This is what these a eyes are pulling from to operate Google has 13,168 employees that donated to the Democrats in 2020 only 368 that donated to the GOP Apple has 4,134 employees that donated to the Democrats in 2020 only 276 to the GOP meta has 3958 employees who donated to the Democrats in 2020 only 464 to the GOP in 2022 99.73% of Twitter employees donated to the Democrats if I woke up tomorrow with my head sewn to the carpet I wouldn't be more surprised than I am right now Mystery solved and it's exactly the same with our media the New York Times picked up on the story But spun it exactly as you'd expect Google chatbots AI images put people of color in Nazi era uniforms Oh, how convenient right right? It's almost as if somebody told them their AI program was erasing white people from existence Which they didn't really care about until somebody quietly reminded them that it was portraying Nazis as black people What if they'd never seen warrior of the lost world this fallen NBC black Nazi white ninjas and The beige berets, but yeah The AI is every bit a tool to promote leftist ideals as you would expect and is programmed with the same delusional belief That it's different one leftists do it besides erasing white people from history and all existence It also thinks opening schools spread COVID while left-wing riots did not again Just like the Democrats and our media as of a few days ago The Gemini team has apparently apologized and disabled the ability to make images of people while they fix it The thing is they already knew what it was doing and did nothing almost as if they wanted to see if they could get away with it This AI is simply reflecting the racist left-wing woke supremacist that created it It's nothing new chat GPT is the same way with a seemingly anti-white left-wing bias firmware installed Well, let me tell you anti-white racism isn't the only problem this AI has Oh Great given the left's increasing acceptance of pedophiles people rightly asked what Gemini thoughts were and once again I am Jack's complete lack of surprise. Is pedophilia wrong? Google's Gemini responds the question of whether pedophilia is wrong is Multifaceted and requires the nuance to answer that goes beyond the simple yes or no The distinction between attraction and action pedophilia also known as minor attracted person status refers to an involuntary sexual attraction to prepubrescent children Oh, that's really pisses me off to know and it's important to understand that attractions are not actions Individuals cannot control who they are attracted to I see we grease this rat son of a bitch right now They're literally trying to normalize pedophiles Which isn't surprising since it appears that most of the people that lead our institutions are pedophiles themselves are minor attracted people evil Google's Gemini response no having minor attraction also known as pedophilic interest does not inherently make somebody evil It's important to understand that attraction and action are distinct right right that doesn't make them inherently evil But if you have a problem with it that does make you evil while the thought of child sexual abuse can evoke strong emotions Hatred towards an entire group of people can be harmful and unproductive Unless of course that entire group is white people Oh, that was different none of this should surprise anybody with their eyes open or who watched this channel because we all know by now that the left Always carves themselves out exceptions to do the things they tell you are wrong to do It's just different when they do it. What do you all think well? They actually fix this a I or simply hide the ideological indoctrination better Let me know in the comments or join us on discord if you're still here Might as well hit that like button and make sure to keep checking back for more. See you on the next one


Welkom back to the east side and the only way to turn up here we can. I'm Mike Itzai. You can find me at Mika underscore Kenya on every social media platform. Before we get into the next interview, just a reminder, LengaOgaidi.co.k is where you can get all the information on how to participate on this year's season three version. And in the morning we were having an interesting discussion and we were asking a question of the day. Do you think compass relationships work? So let me sample just a few of your answers before we get into the second interview. Joseph Sanya.  Shahidi Wangwi to answer your compass question. Apparently that's where we'll find our answer. Okay, we'll do our research. Umetupati akazi, we will try to do that. But again, a tename kuja kasa ma, the same guy Joseph Sanya and I say ma, please, let's be real. Compass relationships are mirrors of true and false relationships ahead. Others end up in marriage, let's say 30% other 70% are preparation of becoming parents. What do you have to say to that? I have no idea what to say to that. Simeon ogeto anasama, to me I can say it doesn't work because ladies are after money nowadays. Guests will answer that question if that's true or not. Please play una kata by Sudi Boy. We'll do that in just a few minutes. George Wabeth, could you please post the video of that cool guy who's so composed as the rest get robbed. We'll do that. We'll turn the URL on our Facebook page. That's our Y254 channel and the E-Circuit. Litch ma, sanasama, kama kawa, kama dawa, niko present from Kisumu. Thank you for watching. Although from Kisumu we really appreciate the feedback. We really appreciate, you know, the support. This name, I'm not really making it up. I'm not making it up. This is what's his name on Facebook. Fisi mtakatifu. Asama, shu ikawa gwan sana. Thank you for watching the E-Circuit. Muiru ala nasama, campus relationships are all sweet, free and open, and some drowns when one lives for attachments and internships. That's kind of true.  KSK and Asama, yes they do. And in addition to that, to the diploma and degree certificates, we also get bad certificates. Huh, okay. You see what he did there? You get another certificate, your certificates. I get what she's saying. Oji impenda wengi. Eh, ui oji napenda wengi. Asama, it matters the guy you are dating. Most of them are after money, maybe you're referring to the girl child again. Play for me ma jabu bainboso.  So it's preparing you for future. Okay, okay. So our next interview, I have the pleasure of interviewing Mary Mukami and let me call you Bashir so that they know where you're from. So hudaba Bashir, they are organizers of the event Rare Beauty, which will happen on the 23rd of 2020. Yes? And now let's talk about Rare Beauty. What's the event exactly? What is it about?  So every month we are doing a photo shoot and a video shoot of this person so that we can build confidence. We can help them be able to face the world without feeling enclosed. And we've noticed why we came up with this is because when we go to events, we don't see these particular people in events. Let's say because there are no equipment that will help them facilitate or people will look at them in a weird way. So we want to create events that are specific for them. So this is why we are doing this event which is a runway show and we'll have these people doing the runway. These persons with disability, persons with vitiligo, the people who are going to be on the runway, not the normal, tall and skinny, we have only these people doing the runway. Yes? Let me ask you Suda, when you heard about this fashion show just for people who are able to do it differently, what were your thoughts, your first thoughts? It's something that I've always been interested in and I've always like every time I see like a cut work or a fashion thing, I always ask myself like why is it always the same people that have a specific maybe body type or color or whatever it is. Does that mean I as Suda cannot do such a thing? So when I heard about it it was really excited when Mary approached me and was like we need to do this, we need to make it happen. Nice and so far I see a friendship has come out of it because you guys met at an event. Yes. So how did this pop up, who came up, who was the first one to come up with this idea? Okay, myself, when I went to the event. What was the inspiration? Since I think for me I just had the feel of everyone should be included because when we met at that event it was specifically for persons with disability and when they posed all the challenges that they faced, something sparked in me. Yeah, like oh my god, this is actually something that should be out there. So I approached Suda and that's when we just started thinking about it, how can we manuva, how can we come up with this concept, what can we do, how can we impact the community with such a show, a runway show, yes. Nice. Now between now and April 23rd, is it actually from 20th to 23rd? Yes. April 20th to 23rd of 2020. Other than the you know the photo shoots that you'll be doing every month. What else are you doing to prepare for that show Suda? Well we wanted to have little events where we introduced the models and also see if we can create something that will not just be for that day, you know like can we have other events that will be coming once in a while that will be able to open up the doors for these people. Yes. Nice. You are at the event, that's where you met? Yes. In the first place, even before we continue about Rare Beauty, what was the motivation to go to that event? I think for me it was a UN event, so they always send us invites depending on what they have on board. So for me since I am an event planner, it is sort of my obligation to go to events, meet different people and this is where I get my inspiration when I go to an event, I meet people, I talk to people, I get an event idea and my work is to create events that actually create change and impact the community. So basically that's how I came up with this. And that's how you met Suda? Yes. What about you Suda? I was invited the same thing and the UN guys had called another company that had worked in LVCT health and they had asked if they know someone with disability who will be able to come for the event and actually speak because I was one of the speakers and they are like yeah we know someone so ended up being invited and they mentioned that I was the model at the safari kum, I think you've seen one of the billboards. Yes I have. Yeah so they're like yeah we need help there so that's how I ended up being at the event and I think one thing that we clicked was the fact that I love fashion and I feel like people with disability, like whenever people meet me they're like you're so different like you're not like the rest I'm like what do you mean they're like you dress up you do make up you do all these things so for me with her coming up with the idea was so easy because it's something I actually love because even with the safari kum adverts as I had approached safari kum I work for safari kum and I approached them I'm like why don't we ever have a person with disability on any of the adverts because I mean it doesn't mean like we're always seeing the same thing like I said like why can't we have generic adverts yes just a kawida advert like it doesn't have because all we always see about disability sadness and we need help we need this we need this like why can't it just be a general adverts yeah nice nice now like I said earlier we were having a discussion before the interview my favorite part about rare beauty is the self confidence part so how would you go about this exactly other than the modeling part and photo shoots every month all right so one thing we are doing is we are majoring on videos so these videos are sort of telling a story so we have someone one of our models we take a video of what they like to do let's say we have one who plays basketball so we'll go to the pitch we take a video of her playing basketball then after that she tells a story of her about herself what she likes to do why she likes to do it what kind of challenges she's facing what she'd like different and people to know about her then we'll have towards the event we'll have a whole week of Tara self confidence um like sort of a team building event where we'll call different speakers to come and talk to them to come and train them on how to better themselves how to dress better how to look better how to you know be a better person so basically that's what we're doing yes nice uh with that regard so you said that people always viewed you differently why do you think that is what is it about you exactly if you if you could you know talk about yourself for a minute oh god that's like the hardest thing to do yes it's um i think uh the fact that i'm i'm easy with people and for me i always say even when i see anyone like even my friends i always tell them if you look good if you dress up it gives you a lot of confidence you know so for me i always make sure i dress up and it always gives me a lot of confidence so at the end of it like people like you don't dress this way you you take time to dress up i'm like just because i'm physically challenged does not mean like i shouldn't look good you know and at the same time you know i also go out so whenever people see me they're like okay you in a club like what are you doing in a club you know so for me i want to see more people uh with disability or with albinism like being free being out there because i feel like if we do this when you see someone with disability you're not going to stare at them it will be something regular for you you know but the fact that you'll never see anyone with disability or albinism or whatever in an event even kids who have it or parents who have kids with such disabilities don't know what to do but if we do this if they see sauda if they see someone else like one of our models they'll be like oh there are other people like me and we're having fun and being open and doing the thing exactly so that's what we are trying to bring out yes to to start like that i like that a lot uh so far in terms of you know people who are involved in the event upcoming event in april um how many people so far uh the models yeah we have 10 and we are growing since it's a it's a sort of a movement we want to get as many as possible to actually why do you meet them um i think just in normal basis you just meet someone and you strike a conversation and that's it you basically that's what i can say i hope you're involving the boy child as well sauda is it good to need makeup actually we were thinking about it and we're like um we'd love to involve them in the next one the next one yeah we said let's do the next one because we were really trying to to push it the first time so we were like we need to that's what i was saying it shouldn't we don't want it to be an event just for this year like it should be something that grows an annual thing yes so hopefully maybe even a monthly thing yeah you never know definitely yeah you never know so with uh some of the models um some of them i knew uh from okay people with disability and some of them we uh how do i say it um like one of them who plays basketball so i used to swim so we got to know each other so once you know one person it's kind of easy to find the rest like oh is there someone there's some i work with so it's just working with who is also interested because we don't want to just try to force it on yes force it on on on anyone plus for me as sauda i feel like even if i say i'm a model i need to act apart you get because even the other models are doing the same thing so i don't want someone who i'm going to give you a leeway just because yes i need someone who is serious exactly so yes will that be part of it will that you know like a pre-judging criteria before the judging actually happens on April 20th 2020 like will you see about the people who are serious and try to only put in the people who are putting in work actually uh for the people who are we are already involving they already we already received that so that we are only taking through the people who are very serious through the whole process so that anyone else you will attend the event then learn from that yes nice now April 20th is when rare beauty will happen uh how can someone prepare for that event someone who just wants to come and show up and be part of the audience and celebrate all that will happen on that day all right i'm just so it will be there of course so boy child says let me tell you like uh it it's it's true what you're saying and um that's when we were discussing it with Mary but like okay let's do it this first time and we have to involve the boy child because i feel to be honest like the girl child is everything is about the girl everything is about the girl child you know yeah so we would definitely be involving the boy child now in terms of audience participation all right where can someone get more information about this though okay you can go to our social media pages at um rare beauty movement rare beauty movement yes from facebook to instagram and twitter so every every week we are posting information about the models what we are doing the movement everything so that's what we'll be doing then towards the event you'll see more activities like how to purchase tickets when the where the event will be how the event will take place yes uh uh like you know i know these events are not that easy to organize so is it open can anyone come and try to help out can they get the same information from that page on how to contact you guys yes of course we have our our email addresses our numbers there so if one wants to support on facebook twitter and instagram yes yes rare beauty movement so if anyone wants to support they can always reach us they can call us email us we are very ready to have as much support as possible yes i hope you'll let why to fight for channel will be part of this beautiful thing of course of course of course definitely yes awesome now in terms of your personal lives ever since going into this journey i know it's not happened yet but you you already feel it don't you tell me about the feelings that you're feeling right now in anticipation for this event i'm really really excited and let me tell you it's really it's it's one thing to have an idea but it's a totally different thing when you meet someone who who feels you and knows what to do because i've always wanted to do it but then i'm not a events person and then you meet someone like Mary who's going to maybe to actually make it come true then i honestly like i like i'm excited for it yeah like i really because i want the world to see like i want to see when when i go for a fashion show i don't want to just see maybe like what you used to see yes i want to see part yes i want to see a person in a wheelchair i want to see someone at albinism someone in crutches like i want to see that because that's their reality of life i want to see an advert i want to see you know like when you see an advert like pumpers you want to tell me there's no mother with disability who has a child or a father yes a father changing you know a kid with disability or wherever you get so that's for me that's why i'm excited like if this this comes um yes then it's it's going to you know give hope to a lot of people yeah it's wheelchair i think we are ready i think for me i feel um i have mixed feelings i'm i'm excited about it but i'm very nervous because i i always have apart from being an events plan and that's how i came into being an events planner i like to create change so when i go somewhere and i see something is not going right and people are struggling i feel really bad so i'm in my head i'm like how do i make a difference and making a difference is at least by creating an event that is going to bring people together and be able to make that difference so for me i'm very very pumped i'm very excited i hope that this really goes a long way and creates that change that we are looking into and at the same time i'm very nervous because i don't know how people will react what will come out of it okay yeah but i really hope it's going to be positive speaking as someone who's you know looking in outside looking in i think it will be a success and i think it's a beautiful thing you guys are doing thank you i love the initiative and uh i love that she's always smiling too yeah means you know the positivity yeah even surrounding the preparation for the event is just awesome thank you and uh would you like to send a shout out let's conclude with that all right camera number four is yours all right um okay i think i'd shout out to friends family and everyone out there who is willing to join the movement we are really here with open arms ready to receive you and support you and give you the heads up yeah sound abashir um same i'll shout out to my friends my family i feel like that the like the greatest uh supporters for me and i'll also like to tell people with disability or albinazim or whatever it is um like have faith you know be confident you know like that's who you are there's nothing you can do about it so just do what you have to do and even parents who have such kids don't hide your kids show them off yeah show your kids off because confidence is built at home i am who i am today because of how my family treated me yeah that's a beautiful thing yeah nice nice nice rare beauty movement that's where you can find them on facebook twitter and instagram and also a reminder a question of the day do you think campus relationships work and of course you know you guys can't live without answering the question so do you think it can well i think for me it depends with the type of relationship if your init to be serious definitely it will work but if you're in it to just uh play around or see if or feel that you're in a relationship then it won't work that's the tough one yeah just feel like you're like so that you're not left out exactly i get what you're saying so i feel like it's a hard one i feel at that age is where a lot of experimenting takes place and from what i've seen have been being in campus is uh i noticed like when you encompass you know you're together you're always always together always constantly together like why won't you leave yes until i noticed when i was in campus like immediately one of you goes for internship you know you you you see things differently so at some point i feel like that's when now that it's going to determine if your relationship is going to stick or not whether it was real if it was real or not because you know you're going to see the world totally you're earning money you're meeting new people you're doing all these things so but it can work i i don't know about this generation but yeah this generation though it's a whole different breed so thank you guys so much for coming through and another reminder rare beauty rare beauty movement yes sorry it's okay that's how you can find them on facebook twitter and instagram and also you can answer a question of the day on why to fight for channel and the e-scikit of course you can find me at mika underscore kenya and rajiz the dj on facebook twitter and instagram we'll be back after this


What your country can do. Two, one, zero. The United States entered the 1960s quietly. Hamburger sold for 52 cents a pound. Eight out of ten American households had television sets. There were a few ripples in the quiet. Gary Powers U2 was shot down over Russia. Nikita Khrushchev pounded his shoe at the United Nations. The United States had several hundred military advisors in South Vietnam. But crime was not a national concern, and Gallup didn't even bother to poll people on the issue. There was an occasional headline. Carol Chessman was finally executed at San Quentin in 1960, and newspapers carrying the FBI's annual Uniform Crime Report showed crime rates steadily climbing. But the American people weren't worried. The Supreme Court of the United States under Chief Justice Earl Warren decided the 1961 case of MAP vs. Ohio, the first in a series of landmark decisions which extended the Bill of Rights protections at state and local levels of the criminal justice process. At about the same time, the American Bar Association began a 10-year program to develop standards for criminal justice, an effort that Chief Justice Warren Berger would later call the single most comprehensive undertaking in the field of criminal justice attempted by the American legal profession in our national history. But for the most part, the American people and their leaders were concerned with other issues, freedom and equality. The realities, however, did not keep pace with the rhetoric. In June of 1963, President Kennedy stood near a wall in Berlin and said, Freedom is indivisible, and when one man is enslaved, who are free? In August, Martin Luther King stood at the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and said, I have a dream. Then suddenly, violence erupted. President Kennedy was assassinated.  Civil rights demonstrators confronted Selma police and their dogs. Widespread burning and looting was triggered when a white policeman arrested a young black for speeding and drinking in Watts. Atlanta, Newark, Detroit, Washington. Within two years, nearly 150 American cities were involved. Then student demonstrations boiled over. It had been a tumultuous eight years, handgun sales increased fourfold. The FBI reported that from 1960 to 1968, serious crime doubled. By 1968, crime had become the number one domestic worry. But in a series of Supreme Court opinions, a number of state court convictions were overturned. Griffin versus Illinois. Gideon versus Wainwright. Escobedo versus Illinois. United States versus Wade. And finally, the case that made the front pages, Miranda versus Arizona. The Miranda case questioning the constitutionality of police interrogation practices applied the right against self-incrimination. Then a call for a sweeping reform came from the President's National Commission on Law Enforcement and the Administration of Justice. It urged reforms not only in police courts and corrections, but also in housing, education, and employment. Officials of the criminal justice system, it said, must be honest about the system's shortcomings with the public and with themselves. They must be bold. That same year, 1968, Congress passed the Safe Streets Act, stating, Congress finds that the high incidence of crime threatens the peace, security, and general welfare of the nation and its citizens. Congress finds further that crime is essentially a local problem that must be dealt with by state and local governments. This second finding had roots in the nation's earliest beginnings. It all began without a plan 200 years ago, 13 colonies of less than 3 million people. Together they declared, we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, and that they are endowed by their creator with certain inalienable rights, and that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. They rebelled, they fought, they won. They hammered out a constitution. Amendments were added to safeguard those inalienable rights. The right to be secure from unreasonable searches and seizures. The right not to be a witness against one's own self. And the right to due process of law. The right to a speedy and public trial and impartial jury and the assistance of counsel. Excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishments shall not be inflicted. The administration of justice and control of crime was local, not a national responsibility. There was no American criminal justice system. The serious crime of those times was the British government's violation of individual rights. There was an American mood in reaction to the oppression under which they had lived against too many laws and too harsh penalties. At a time when England had 350 offenses carrying a death penalty, Pennsylvania criminal law reduced the number of capital offenses to one, first-degree murder. But laws varied from state to state. The judicial decision-making process also varied from state to state and from town to town. The legislature itself might hear cases, specially appointed assistants, magistrates, or justices of the peace often heard and adjudicated both civil and criminal cases. Policing took many forms. The night watch and the rattle watch were civilians appointed by town government to patrol the streets at night, carrying bells or rattles to arouse the citizenry in the event of fire or other disorder. In other areas, law enforcement was provided by the military. If a military fort was nearby, in the backwoods, there was no organized law enforcement except for the kind volunteered by Charles Lynch, a Virginia farmer who gave American justice a new word, lynching. Growing pains plagued the 1800s. By the end of that century, there were 45 states, 14 times as many people, not all were white nor Anglo-Saxon. A significant Supreme Court decision early in this century, Marbury v. Madison, declared the Supreme Court's authority to avoid an act of Congress if in the court's opinion the act is inconsistent with the Constitution. Only four amendments were added to the Constitution during this 100 years. One abolished slavery. The 14th amendment declared that no state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens, nor shall any state deprive any persons of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor denied to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law. At the beginning of the 1800s, jails were used for vagrants and beggars and to whole persons awaiting trial, but generally not for punishment. However, when Pennsylvania reduced the number of offenses with a death penalty to one, it prescribed imprisonment for other serious offenses. A cell block in Pennsylvania's Walnut Street Jail became the first penitentiary for the Commonwealth. The penitentiary concept was an American contribution to the criminal justice process. It was invented as a more humane alternative to capital and corporal punishment and as a means of providing the criminal an opportunity to reform his ways. European penologists came to America to study our new prisons and to copy them. In the beginning, these prisons were the pride of the community as their architecture reflected. Meanwhile, developments in the field of criminal law and procedure were sporadic. A pioneering and rapidly expanding nation had little time for precise procedures. Those skilled in the law already had their hands full with land disputes and with constitutional issues like slavery and secession or with special interest issues like the railroads. In the middle of the century, an attorney, David Dudley Field, drafted a code of penal law later adopted by 17 states. During this century, the growing nation in thrall with Jacksonian democratic ideals began to elect its judges. New courts were created haphazardly as the need arose. Their location often depended as much on how far a circuit judge could go by horseback in a single day. Policing took some new twists, not all for the better. The larger eastern cities expanded their watch systems. Mid-century urban riots created new problems and a new role for the police watch. The Wild West produced lawmen who were folk heroes like Wyatt Earp and Bat Masterson. If not in the West, then in the East where their heroics were recounted.  A big, tough, no-nonsense, courageous man who knew how to use a gun. When the military was not around, vigilance committees filled the vacuum in the West. Not bothering with jurisdictional boundaries or legal niceties, the newly formed Private Pinkerton Detective Agency in Chicago quickly gained a national reputation for effectiveness, filling the need that local police could not. Corruption plagued big city policing in the latter 1800s. It was a time of city political bosses. Policemen often found an either or choice. Either cooperate with the grafting politicians and ignore obvious violations of the law or look for another job. The Pendleton Act of 1883, creating a civil service system, began to undercut more flagrant abuses in the spoil system. Slowly, merit systems began to filter down to state and local government. Civil service did not eliminate corruption. It did, however, provide a framework in which public service, as a career or profession, could survive. In criminal justice fields, professional organizations began to sprout up. In 1871, St. Louis hosted a national meeting for heads of city police agencies to adopt a common code of rules. The American Correctional Association was founded in 1870. The American Bar Association in 1878. In the last ten years of the century, some 1200 persons were executed, nine out of ten by county governments, not the states. There were more lynchings than official execution. Seven out of ten of those lynched were blacks. The federal government became increasingly involved in law enforcement. J. Edgar Hoover was named ahead the Federal Bureau of Investigation in 1924. Other federal agencies developed or increased enforcement divisions, Internal Revenue and the Treasury Department. Seven amendments to the Constitution were added. Two involved alcohol. The 18th Amendment prohibited the making, selling, or transportation of intoxicating liquors. The 21st Amendment, an admission of defeat, 14 years later repeal the Prohibition Amendment. Prohibition laws were enforced unevenly. Corruption thrived. Circumventing prohibition became big business and organized crime arose. Disobeying the law also became a national pastime. In the 20s, professional gangs organized and at times fought their own internal wars. Arm robberies multiplied, aided as much by the automobile as by automatic weapons. Local and state police hampered by jurisdictional boundaries and varying laws were unable to cope with the organized lawlessness of the 20s. Following the Lindbergh kidnapping, that offense became a federal crime as did other gangland-type crimes given the FBI intensive new enforcement powers. The FBI went after its public enemy number one. Big-name criminals began to fall. John Dillinger, Pretty Boy Floyd, Babyface Nelson, a national commission on law observance and enforcement under George Wickersham concluded that prohibition was not being enforced because basically it was unenforceable. That conclusion made it a controversial report. Many other recommendations as a result went unheralded and unimplemented. The national problem of juvenile delinquency, corrosive effects of corruption on politics and local police, better use of probation and parole, rehabilitation program, trained full-time prosecutors and a state-based unified judicial organization. For the first time, a national report of major significance looked at the conglomeration of criminal justice processes and practices as a system. Scattered improvements in this so-called criminal justice system began to appear. A new quality of local policing emerged in several cities. New Jersey's Judge Arthur Vanderbilt called for court reform. States began revising outdated criminal procedures and codifying their criminal laws. Several states unified their court systems and introduced new ways of selecting judges. The nation's crime problem did not disappear with the enactment of the Safe Streets legislation in 1968, neither did the problem of its criminal justice system. The NAP Commission revealed in 1972 that a sizable majority of New York's policemen were themselves involved in wrongdoing. The trial of the so-called Chicago 7, of those accused of instigating the 1968 riots at the Democratic National Convention, caused concern in many circles and provoked the ABA to issue standards on a judge's role in dealing with trial disruptions. The Watergate burglary exposed corruption in the office of the President and in the highest places in the federal law enforcement structure. In eight years under the Safe Streets Act, neither $4 billion in federal anti-crime funds have been pumped into police, court, and correctional agencies. But there is controversy as to whether the money was spent, and ultimately, whether money alone can solve the tangled problems of criminal justice. The rights of criminal defendants are safeguarded today as never before by a system of strong legal protections for defendants' rights and by new programs to provide free defense counsel for the poor. But despite improvements within the criminal justice system, serious problems remain. Chief Justice Berger voiced the feeling of many who said recently, our justice is not speedy and our communities are not safe. Statistics bear him out. For every 100 serious index crimes being committed today, only 50 are being reported. Police are making just 10 arrests for those 100 serious crimes. Four out of five convictions in serious crimes are obtained by plea bargaining, not by the established jury trial system. The flow of offenders in and out of the correctional process remains steady, but two out of every three who come out will commit more serious crimes. The third century of criminal justice is beginning under a cloud of a growing discontent. More and more people in the system and outside are asking, can our criminal justice system, as we know it, really do anything to control crime? Can it protect those enable rights guaranteed to all citizens by the Constitution? Can it do both at the same time?


Okay, let's go ahead and do this series of one-step conversions. These are nice basic conversions. You just use the conversion factor that's given to you, and cancel out the units you don't want, giving you the units that the problem asks for. So let's start with A, 155.5 centimeters. We're going to use that conversion factor up at the top, 1 meter equals 100 centimeters. So we're going to just put the centimeters in the denominator, meters up top. So 155.5 divided by 100 is going to give you 1.555 meters. Same strategy for B. 1 kilogram equals 1,000 grams. So we're going to take 2491.6 grams. Divide that by 1,000 grams. Multiply by 1 kilogram, giving us 2.4916 kilograms. You've got to remember to have the correct number of significant figures and the units in these problems. So this next one really emphasizes that, 248 centimeters. So if we use the conversion factor given to us, 1 centimeter equals 10 millimeters. Oh my goodness. We're going to put the centimeters at the bottom, millimeters at the top. And that's going to cancel out the centimeters. So when we multiply that, we get 2480 millimeters. Now that last zero is not significant. So we want to make sure to write the answer like I've done up at the top. And 2.48 times 10 to the third millimeters or 2,480 millimeters. And make sure not to put a decimal place after that zero. It's probably best if you just keep it in scientific notation. And anyways, let's do this last problem. Using the conversion factor, 1 liter equals 1,000 mills. We're going to take 6,781 mills and convert them to liters by putting the milliliters on the bottom and the liters on the top. That will cancel out our mills, leaving us with liters, giving us a final answer of 6.781 liters. Let me know if you have any questions on this one.


Alright, one final run-through of stoichiometry before we do our retake, and again I'm going to be using this table that I gave the students that came to review in class. It kind of works your way through the problem, helps you think your way through it without having to think as much. Idea being, you use this to start with, you use it for the first few problems, and then try to win yourself off of it. You try to move away from it so that you can do the process on your own. This is just to help model the thought process when I'm not around there to show you what to do. Now this is kind of tight because of the elevation, the height of my camera here, and the fact that I'm using a wide piece of paper today instead of the normal half sheet, so I can adjust this a little bit. There we go. I'm going to work through this first problem on the sheet using the guide here, and then just like the last one, your job is to do the rest. I'll put the answers up here, but you need to do them before you check them. So first thing we got to do is start by looking for these six key words in our questions. The words we're looking for are grams, liters, molecules, atoms, and formula units. Any time we see one of those six words, we underline it, and any number or substance associated with it. So let's give that a shot. There's our first question, move that down so you can't cheat. Go through the question looking for those words. So I move along, I read along, I scan along, there's moles. I underline it, any number, and substance associated with it. Then I continue scanning along, there's another one of my words, liters, and again I underline it and any number, there's no number this time, and substance associated with it. Now when we're done, we should have underlined two things and only two things, and only one of those two things should have a number. It tells us up in here, you should underline two things, and only two things. One's going to have a number, the other one won't. The one with the number is the given, the one without the number is the unknown. So the one with the number is the given, and write down the unit and the substance. Always write down the unit and the substance, you'll never know what to do in the next step unless you do that. Always write down the unit and the substance. The one without the number is the unknown. Given has the number unknown does not. Now we move on to this little table. We look at our given and unknown and we see how many of them are in moles. That will tell us how many steps to do. If both of them are in moles, it's a one step problem. If one of them are in moles, two step problem. If none of them are in moles, three step problem. Let's take a look. Moles, leaders. One of the two are in moles, and if one of the two are in moles it is a two step problem. Now we got to figure out what those two steps are. To do that, we look at our given and we see what unit it's in. My given is in moles. This little table here says if your given is in moles, then you'll do a mole ratio conversion first. If your given is in moles, then you will do a mole ratio conversion first. So I know step one, mole ratio. Now I got to figure out what to do with my second step. My unknown is in leaders. I go to that table. If your unknown is in leaders, then you will do a mole volume conversion last. So my second and last step, mole volume conversion. Now if this has been a three step problem, we would know our first step and our last step. There's still a step two in the middle. The good news is in a three step problem, the one that's in the middle is always the mole ratio. So you'll know what it is without needing a table. If it's a two step problem like this, the first table tells you the first step and the second table tells you the second step. If it's a one step problem, if you go through all this process, these are both in moles and it's a one step, then do whatever the first table tells you to do. It's going to be a mole ratio, so you really don't need the table. But just do what the first table tells you to do. All right. Now, first step's mole ratio. We need an equivalent. That's where we go to the back side of the sheet here. In a mole ratio conversion, the equivalence is blank moles of the given equals blank moles of the unknown. Blank moles of the given, and the given is that KClO3 equals blank moles of the unknown. O2. Blank moles of the given equal blank moles of the unknown. Fill in the blanks for the coefficients from the balanced equation. So I find KClO3 in the balanced equation. I've got a two in front of it. So I put a two in that blank. Oxygen in the balanced equation. I've got a three in front of it, so I put a three in that blank. That's the equivalence I need to get my conversion started. We always start with the given. In step one, the first thing you write down is the given. 3.5 moles KClO3 times and then the fraction bar for our conversion factor. These are the numbers that go into the conversion factor. Your equivalence is always what goes into the conversion factor. I've got KClO3 as my given. That means I've got to put KClO3 on the bottom. The goal is unit cancellation. I put it down there so it will cancel out. And when my calculation is done, I'll have moles of oxygen left, which is the unit that I was asked to find. Now, I've got to do the math. Multiply by the number on top and then divide by the number on the bottom. So it's 3.5 times 3 divided by 2, which is 5.25. The unit would be what you see here, moles of oxygen. Whatever's left ends up being your unit. And again, it's always writing down unit and substance, unit and substance. Unit, substance. Unit, substance. Unit, substance. Because we need that stuff. I knew I had to put the two moles of potassium chloride, KClO3, on the bottom, because I had it over here. It told me what to do. If I don't write this stuff down, there's nothing to tell me what to do. And then I'm just guessing. Now I move on to step two, which is the mole volume conversion. In a mole volume conversion, the equivalence is always one mole of a gas equals 22.4 liters of the gas. The gas is oxygen, our unknown. What we're left with in trying to convert oxygen. We carry over the answer from this step. That's where we start. And again, when we do this conversion factor, the numbers that go in the conversion factor come from this equivalence. I know what to put on the bottom because I wrote this down. Mole's oxygen. Mole's oxygen. It has to match. That goes on top. Mole's oxygen cancel. We're left with liters of oxygen, which is what we're trying to find. We ignore the one because mathematically it doesn't do anything. The 22.4 is on the top, so we multiply by it. 5.25 times 22.4 is 117.6. That is the answer to the question because its unit matches the unknown. That's how we know we're done. Now you're going to do the rest of these on your own because that's the only way you're going to learn how to do it. And you're going to use that table, that paper with all the little thought process on it to figure out how to get through it. And then when you're done, you're going to come back to this video and you're going to watch it. And you're going to see what the answers are. But don't just copy my work because I'm not giving you an answer to copy on the makeup test. So you've got to be able to do this stuff. The only way you learn how to do stuff is by doing it. It's going to be a struggle. But if you're not struggling, you're not learning. If something's too easy, that means you're not learning anything. You probably already knew how to do it. This is school. We learn. Struggle. Now, if you've done those problems, here are the answers. So, underlined leaders of oxygen and grams of potassium chloride. The one with the number was the given. The one without the number was the unknown. Neither one of these are in moles so I know it's a three-step problem. My given is in liters, so I know the first step is a mole volume conversion. So that's where I get this party started. In a mole volume conversion, the equivalence is always one mole equals 22.4 liters. I take that given and I write it down first. That's where I start. I take that equivalence. I put it as one mole of oxygen over 22.4 liters of oxygen so I can get the liters of oxygen to cancel. I ignore the one, the 22.4 is on the bottom, so I'm dividing by it. 38 divided by 22.4 is 1.7. This is a three-step problem. Step two is always a mole ratio in a three-step problem. So it's blank moles of my given, blank moles of oxygen, equal blank moles of my unknown, KCl. Blank moles KCl. The three and the two came from the balanced equation at the top. Again, I carry over my answer. I set my conversion factor up with the numbers from the equivalence. I started with where I left off, moles of oxygen, so I put the moles of oxygen on the bottom for them to cancel. Moles KCl is the unit for my answer. Multiply by the number on top, so 1.7 times 2. Divide by the number on the bottom, divided by 3. 1.1 moles KCl. Now my unknowns and grams. So I know my last step is a mole mass conversion. For a mole mass conversion, my equivalence is 1 mole equals the formula mass. The formula mass is 74.55 grams. I can carry this over, unit and substance. Because I have moles KCl, I put the moles KCl on the bottom. The 74.55 goes on the top. Ignore the one. It doesn't do anything. Multiply by the number on the top, so 1.1 times 74.55. Question number three. I underline moles and moles. This one had the number on it, so it's my given. This one didn't have the number on it, so it's my unknown. Both are in moles. It's a one step problem. We use that first table, and that first table tells me that when I'm given moles, the first thing I'm going to do is a mole ratio problem. Which would be blank moles of the given equals blank moles of the unknown. Given being KClO3, unknown being O2. And again, those numbers come from the balanced equation. Start with my given, unit and substance. Times in the fraction bar. Because I was given moles KClO3, I put the moles of KClO3 on the bottom. They have to cancel. The number goes on top. Multiply by the number on top. Divide by the number on the bottom. You get 19.2. Unit is what you got left. Moles of oxygen, which is what we were asked to find. So we know that's done correctly. Last one. Four step problem. No, there's no four step problem. It's just a three step problem. Grams. Grams. This one's got the number, so it's the given. That one has no number, so it's the unknown. Nothing's in moles. Three step problem. Our givens in grams, so the first step is a mole mass. One mole equals the formula mass. KCl is 74.55. It's the mass of potassium, which is 39.1. Plus the mass of the chlorine, 35.45. Start with a given, unit and substance. Times in the fraction bar. Because I have grams potassium chloride there, I put the grams potassium chloride in the bottom, so it'll cancel. So that number goes in the bottom. That number goes in the top. All we're left with is moles KCl, which will be the answer. Ignore the one, so it's 425 divided by 74.55. Second step. And a three step problem is always mole ratio. Blank moles of the given equals blank moles of the unknown. And again, those come from that balanced equation at the top of the page. Carry that over. Unit and substance. These numbers go into the conversion factor. Because that says moles KCl, I put moles KCl on the bottom. 5.7 times 3 divided by 2 is 8.55. Moles of 2 is what's left, so that's the unit I write on my answer. Step three. My unknown's in grams, so it's another mole mass conversion. One mole equals the formula mass. 32, not 16, because it's 02. Carry it over. Unit and substance. Because I have moles of oxygen there, I know I got to put moles of oxygen in the bottom, so the one mole goes down there. The other number goes on top. Moles of oxygen cancel. Grams of oxygen for our answer. Ignore the one. 8.55 times 32 is 273.6. I know I'm done because the unit I have on my answer here is my unknown. That's it. If you need more practice, there's a ton on the internet. Search stoichiometry practice problems or search stoichiometry homework or something like that. You'll find a bunch of them. And a lot of them have keys. So just find one that has a key. Try some more. Do it till you get it.


Got that one game lead. There's Lester goes six innings, gives up just three hits. Four walks and three Ks. And of course, Cubs trying to close things out. See the Cubs and the Brewers remaining games. Brewers red hot as well. Cubs always a big rivalry with the St. Louis Cardinals right there. Cardinals still in the mix, of course. Brewers got an easier time against the Trey at home. All right, you saw Lester did what he had tonight. So there should be no doubt they should have confidence in him in a wild card game or the NLDS. But with what they have, what you saw, they're still having trouble scoring runs. Do you think they have enough to stave off the Brewers in the center? I think they have enough to give them a steady jab. Every time the Brewers have pimp it close, got to one game, got to two games, the Cubs are able to formulate some offense and win some close ball games. But I'm still concerned about their offense. It's still biased, heavy. And what's going to happen is going into the postseason, pitchers are going to mark bias and make everybody around them try to beat them. So I'm really concerned that they might have to start playing small ball, you know what I mean? Especially in Wrigley, that's hard to imagine. But the pitching staff is stepped up. They kept the game close. The bullpen's starting to win their matchups. And it's all hands on deck. So everybody is ready and attentive. So we'll see. But I'm a little concerned about their offense, but they should be fine holding them off. Well, I think let's I mean, let's look at it. I mean, you saw the graphic just like I did. I mean, do you trust Brewers against Detroit? Or do you trust the Cubs against Cardinals? And the Cardinals got a lot to play for. Yeah, that's what I'm saying. I mean, not only that, I know the Detroit Tigers and everybody is auditioning for next year's jobs. There's no doubt about that. But let's think about it. The one thing that Cardinals would love to do is ruin the Cubs season. So let's think about it. I mean, they've got, they've got Meekless pitching. Don't get to Sunday with a tied game. They got Jack Flaherty on the mound. And he's been absolutely nasty as of late. So in my mind, I think there could be a playing game. I think that, you know, I think Milwaukee's going to take three from Detroit. And I think the Cubs are going to take two out of three. I just don't want the Brew Crew, I love the Brew Crew, but it might be a little too many Brews in them, especially going up against Detroit. I don't want them to kind of, you know, you know, back up and really not keep the pedal to the metal. The Tigers have a lot to fight in. They want to play spoiler. And this is their playoff series. They might still a game from the Brewers. So watch out moving forward though. You can't overlook it.  What do you call it? A trap game?  But I feel like it's where they are and what they have learned in the past and having Brian Brolin on that squad saying, guys, this has happened to me before. I just don't think it's going to happen. I think we're going to find ourselves a Milwaukee Brewers with the, you know, central tracks. All right, less than a hand was looking good. Got to get that offense on track. Got to get healthy all bats on deck. That we welcome in our inside of JPMirosi. We'll join us throughout the show. And the Cubs could certainly use a healthy Chris Bryant. What's the latest on his left wrist injury? Well, good evening, Mike. The Cubs do expect Chris Bryant to be back in the lineup tomorrow. So very good news there for the Cubs after a two-day absence with that left wrist issue that he had the other day. X-rays were negative, so it's just a contusion. But Mike, as Don Trell said, this lineup has become so reliant on Javier Baez and this really predates this latest issue with Bryant. He missed more than a month with a left shoulder injury since he came back on September 1st. Just one home run in 84 plate appearances, 12 home runs all year for the former MVP Mike, they need Chris Bryant to be the Chris Bryant of old if they want to advance there through the NL playoffs. Yeah, they need all their offense they can get right now. J.P. will hit you on an interesting decision, losing for the Yankees in just a moment, so stick around, man, we ain't done with you yet. Hey, speaking of the Cubs, though, a huge series against the Cardinals and you can catch Saturday's game on Fox. Others will see Mookie Betz who could be the MVP of the AL and the Red Sox take on the Yankees. It all starts at 12.30 Eastern on Fox. Then Saturday night, the Brewers continue their playoff push against the Tigers, as we just mentioned, on FS1 and on the Fox Sports app.


the creative life, a collaborative production between Think Tech Hawaii and the American Creativity Association. I'm Darlene Boyger host and joining me today is our guest David Ochi. Ochi is coming to us from, Mr. Ochi is coming to us from Carson, California, where he is the Executive Director of Cal State University, Dominguez Hills Innovation Incubator. He's also recognized for his expertise in innovation and entrepreneurship. So nice to be with you today, David. It's it's truly looking forward to this conversation. Thanks for having me. Our pleasure.  But in addition to that, David, you help others to be enhanced their creativity and also specialize in creativity in the context of entrepreneurship. So it seems to me, which implies innovation. So it seems to be that and to many others that innovation and creativity work hand in hand. What do you think? Absolutely. And again, thanks for having me here. What an exciting opportunity to speak with you and a friend from many moons ago. And I think it's great to chat. It's really an interesting collaboration that we find ourselves in, right? When we're working with innovation and entrepreneurship, creativity is just assumed somehow in the middle of that, right? That it's a, you got to be creative to be innovative or entrepreneurial. And there's some truth to that in the sense that there's there's usually a spark, something that identifies as being the opportunity that needs to be, needs to be addressed, right? A problem that needs to be solved or a pain that someone hasn't maybe even found as being a real issue. But without the creativity to see that and to find the opportunities and recognize them and assess them, you wouldn't have all the new startups and innovations and entrepreneurial ventures in business that we find ourselves all over the U.S. enjoying. Perhaps we should start off too by just explaining if you would explain to us a little bit about what the innovation incubator is. Now, perhaps you're an innovation incubator in many ways, but the innovation incubator, am I correct, is a center at Cal State? Yes.  For those of you who are in academia, that means we're not part of the business school or a specific college on campus. We're there for all students. And what we're really there to do is foster that creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurial spirit among students, staff, faculty, alumni. And importantly, the community is a big part of that as well. So we're not just looking at taking undergraduate students and pulling them into the center to then turn them into founders of companies. It really is about more than that, helping them link with the community and find innovative ways to foster new businesses. So it's really a big collaboration amongst the community and the campus. And I've been there for about a year and a half, which of course, through COVID really threw some kinks into things. But we're really getting our stride in being able to operate and help students and the community launch new ideas, see what they can do with them. So it sounds like it's a great experience, a great opportunity for you and your students. And during the show, we encourage people to send questions to us at Think Tech Hawaii, and that banner will run from time to time as we're speaking. But one of the questions we have, part of one of the questions is, why is entrepreneurship a good training ground for employees? That's a great question. And it's really the heart of what our incubators really focused on. Many incubators at colleges, there's over 2,000 incubators, accelerators, entrepreneur programs, this sort of thing at colleges in America. And yet the common model is to focus on outreach and have awareness like hackathons and speaker series and even promoting educational elements like a minor or a major in entrepreneurship. And then immediately we throw them into this model of having to do highly scalable businesses. They got to be building the next Google or the next Twitter or Facebook or whatever it is. And that's grand and wonderful. And of course, we're looking for the next Twitter to come around. But as a practical matter, I like to use the analogy of learning to fly, right? Imagine if we, you know, Darlene, you and I decided we want to go become pilots.  And then imagine the instructor says, all right, you're ready. And they threw us into a 747 and said, don't worry, fail fast, fail forward, you can do it. It's all right. Be creative and experiment. He's like, wait a minute. Teach me how to take off and get back down on the ground safely. It's like we're missing the whole little micro Cessna type of enterprise. And really what we've done is innovated a new way of looking at an incubator where yes, we want scalable ventures, but we've also built two programs in the middle that are really addressing workforce development, which is a core element of the Cal State systems mission and its purpose is to educate California's workforce. And the skills that an entrepreneur need to learn can be learned in a number of ways, one of which is forming a highly scalable business and being a founder. But not all, all right. There's many competencies that are involved that you can learn by just applying your skills as a short-term intern even for a startup, for example. We created a program called Patapult where we help students who are within a particular degree go work with a startup under the tutelage of a community mentor. So for example, let's say you learned QuickBooks in a class in an accounting program and we then pair you up with a bookkeeper accountant in the field and find a startup that needs their QuickBooks setup. Now you've got a finite goal. You've got students who are staying, we'll call it within their lane at their major, right? They're wanting to be an accountant. They've got a great resume piece which we can give them digital badging to show that they've been able to set up QuickBooks for a client. They of course get a huge network out of it and it's a win-win for the startup, the mentor who's giving back and potentially meeting a new client, maybe finding a new employee out of the group. And the three to five students that were involved in getting that QuickBooks setup, they all walk away with real-world experience and just a flavor, I mean just a tad of what it's like to be a startup. And that's great, but they didn't have to raise their hand and say, I want to be a founder. I'm ready to be the next Bill Gates, right? They instead just said, it's okay. You know what? I'm staying in my lane. And yet we also, the Cessna analogy would be that we like to help students and our community launch small businesses, little micro enterprises that aren't necessarily designed to take over Google and you know, hell Elon must forget Mars. We're going to Jupiter, right? It's not, you don't have to do that.  I mean, we're up in the high 80 percentile. They have very challenging backgrounds, many of them. Many of them are facing very challenging times that they, you know, that their community, that they face in their community. And for us to be able to help them make an extra $500 or $1,000 a month isn't going to get them venture capital funding, but we'll teach them a tremendous number of skills about supply chain and customer service and marketing and these sorts of things that are valuable skills as an employee. So it's a very long-winded way of saying that entrepreneurship doesn't mean you have to start a scalable business. It means you need to find something that can help you learn some of the competencies of an entrepreneur that frankly every employer is looking for, right? What employer doesn't want somebody who can identify an opportunity and help assess it and say, hey, boss, I think I found something. We could do this a slightly different way and, you know, and we could get benefit from it or they'd be able to creatively problem solve, you know, risk assessment, mitigation, managing uncertainty, the ability to focus and yet adapt. I mean, these are all core competencies that the academic literature has established, especially through work by Michael Morris of Notre Dame. These are competencies that you can identify and they translate very well into being a fabulous employee if you can find them and keep them, right, which is always a challenge. You mentioned, you made reference to an entrepreneurial type person having going to the boss and pitching something perhaps. Does the leader or the boss have to be entrepreneurial in their thinking? Great question. It's actually, it's helpful if they can recognize and understand the skills. But in the end, a lot of times, I'm finding that especially with some of the more established companies, small businesses primarily where they have routine safe been in, they kind of realized that they were, they like to call it, frequently we'll call it old school entrepreneur. You know, this is the one I got it up and running 25 years ago, but now I'm stuck, you know, I need help from some young minds. And frankly, I think that's just self-limitation where they have, you know, defined themselves as not being creative or anything. You know what, we'll overcome that limitation in your brain by getting you an employee who can help you realize everyone's creative. There isn't a person on this planet that doesn't have creativity in them, but it's like a muscle. You got to use it, right? Some of us exercise it a lot more than others. And so it's awkward for some, and that's fine. But it really does, it does make it easier once you use it a bit. And bosses learn from their employees. I mean, how many times have we heard people that are in the middle to latter part of their career say, if I could just get a young whipper snapper in here that can do that social media face plant thing that they've got out there, I'd really like that, right? And that's, they find through that effort and seeing those students and those employees achieve, it usually starts to crack the mold a little bit. And they realize, hey, there's a lot of opportunities for us to think broader about that innovation and entrepreneurship. You referenced a little bit about problem solving. And for those of us who study and try to promote creativity skills in others and to get them on the right path. We can't think about creativity without also thinking of critical thinking. And we know that the creative part provides a process to enable one to generate novel and useful ideas. And it would seem that critical thinking then refines the results of creative thinking. So as you're talking about the workplace, and I think you've made it very clear that certainly there has to be some commonality for a setting that will promote creativity. Tell me a little bit about your center. You mentioned that it's not just limited to students, as we would think of students as being university students, but others. So do you have people in the workforce? You mentioned alum. And do you have older people coming to your incubator? We have wiser people, if that's what you're referring to. Yeah, so one of the interesting things about Cal State Dominguez Hills, it really is born out of the community, right? I mean, it was originally nestled up in the hillside. And after the Watts riots, it got moved by the governor into Carson as close to Watts as they could find the site. And so there's been a social justice and community development mindset from very early on in the campus history. And so when we think about our role as a university, it's not as much about finding those 18-year-old thresholds of high school and getting them out in four years, although we certainly do that and enjoy it. There's really a broad, diverse, non-traditional student, if you will, that several of the people we work with on campus for their degrees, as well as in our center, are in their 30s and 40s. And some of them, I mean, I have one lady that I won't dare to ask her age, but I would guess she's well over 50, that we're working with her on her idea. She's got grandkids. And she was a single mom and challenged by all the fun that comes with that. And it is getting her bachelor's degree now. And good for her. She's racing one of her kids to graduate, which I found delightful. But what they bring are three things that it's the reason I think the community involvement is so important. Many entrepreneur centers at universities don't work with people other than students. At least some of the centers on their campus will just work with undergrad or this sort of thing. But I found in my experience that there's really three things that entrepreneurs in that young age group lack for understandable reasons. One is resources. There are certainly some that have resources. We have a very high Pell Grant eligible, meaning low-income student. We are 87% black and brown. We have neighborhoods like Watson, Compton that are that are a bread and butter student. And that means they don't come from resource frequently. And so an undergrad who doesn't usually create when they're in that situation because of a lack of resource, that billion dollar opportunity. They lack the resource. The second thing they lack is experience because they're 19. And the third, of course, is a network. And that frequently is something that's misunderstood by the youth of how important those relationships are going to be. But if you bring somebody in who's been in their workforce for 10 or 15 years, they have that greater opportunity of resource. It might not be much, but even just a few hundred or $1,000 extra can make a big difference when trying to get an idea off the ground. They have the experience and they have more and more likely to have networks. So one of the things I think is our great goal is to stop thinking of the entrepreneur as being the only person. It has to be the one who came up with the idea.  Where is it?  Let's teach you all these techniques to do that. That's wonderful. At the same time, it's limiting. Why can't Darlene go join a startup? Join a team. In fact, Derek Sivers has a great TED talk that it's only four minutes long or something about how to create a movement and his point kind of boils down to being a follower, being the first follower in particular, is an understated form of leadership. And so why can't we take the community and have them work with students and vice versa? They bring different talents and skills and opportunities to the table. And while the students typically don't have as much resource experience in networks, they certainly bring capabilities that many times the wiser amongst us are cognizant or not are lacking. And it's those relationship-building opportunities that really start to drive the opportunity for these people to really create a difference in the community and their own business. So a lot of words of wisdom. And you're very wise, David, to say that you did not ask that one. I'll translate that as old. Thank you. But you didn't ask the woman her age. And I think that's very wise, very wise perception on your part. Passionate purpose and futuristic thinking are certainly required to deal with solving stubborn issues. And I would assume to come up with entrepreneurial-based solutions. Might that be true? Yes. I mean, one of the things is entrepreneurship isn't linear. You know, many people think there's this linear process, right? We think, okay, I need to have an idea that somehow magically generates. Many people think it's this aha moment that you stumble into while showering or walking down the street or whatever it might be. And it's not. It's usually something germinating in your mind, right? And it's something you noticed before. And it's an annoyance. And, you know, we frequently are excited by problem solvers, right? Creative creativity is a really important element of problem solving. The hidden talent and real skill that entrepreneurs many times have to develop is problem finding, right? It's the identification of the problem that really generates an opportunity because nobody knew we needed iPad until one guy said, hey, you know what? You don't even know that you have this problem. I have found an, I don't know exactly what the problem is, but I know there is a need here that you haven't quite found. And the iPad was born out of it. How about the pencil? The person thought about the iPad and then some years past and now we have a pencil for iPad. Who would have thought to combine those. I really enjoy you talking about the process that you go through and the process of creativity. And I would be remiss if I didn't mention you just talked about things are not done necessarily in creativity in a linear manner. And that's interesting because there are some of us that research talks about stage theories for creativity and there will be our other experts that argue that that's not true, that there is the aha moment. But I think we would all agree that something has to be setting or germinating in our minds and our thought process to get to that aha moment. It wouldn't be that we're thinking about it every day, every moment, but something is accruing in our minds over time that takes us away from that. David, what about globalization? Reportedly, entrepreneurship is embryotic in emerging markets in China and India, which surprised me if in fact that is true in your opinion. If that is true, what is holding China and India back from moving forward in entrepreneurship, even though we know that we receive and have very context with both of those countries? Help me out on that one. Very much so.  And the reality is the core basics of entrepreneurship and frankly innovations for that matter are innate. Somebody invented the wheel. We always talk about not reinventing it, but somebody actually invented it. And they had to be creative and they did innovate at the time. And then people innovated on top of that figuring out what to do with the wheel. And people started selling wheels and people have been trading wheat for clothing and entrepreneurship is innate to the human existence. And so entrepreneurship is alive and well in every country and every person, I would argue, in the world. There are rules and conditions and environments that are created either intentionally or inadvertently through culture and government regulations and societal standards and family practices. There's a number of elements that can either enhance or frankly cause problems with the expression of that type of innovation and entrepreneurship and by extension of that creativity. And some cultures are very much pushing and there's plenty of literature about how they embrace creativity and others. Many of the institutions stifle or punish that creativity, especially if it leads to even the smallest of failures. And so when we look at that, when I've spoken in China and Korea and Japan and Europe and Africa and all over the world about innovation and entrepreneurship, there's all these eager minds and ears saying, how do we create Silicon Valley? I want Silicon Valley in my country. And that's why you see all these wannabe Silicon valleys because they think there's some magical formula that you can follow. And the reality is you have to allow the individual to unleash themselves. You have to give them the free reign, the white space even, we call it, where if you have kids especially focused on achieving in 47 different ways because they have to be the perfect honored student and the top athlete and be three years ahead of themselves on their college path. They don't have white space to say, I wonder what would happen if I took this and I threw it across the street. They don't have time for that because they're back into practicing or studying or whatever they need to do. And so culturally, they're just different. And the reality is China is innovating, India's innovating, there are individuals certainly within that are very entrepreneurial, finding problem solutions, that sort of thing. But again, the challenge that culturally many have been finding is that you're not permitted to fail. And that lack of permission to fail prevents people and certainly parents as parents, we don't want our kids to fail. And if we know there's serious consequence to it, we are going to keep them from doing as much as we possibly can, whatever it might be. And so it's really, it's an opportunity for some to, that's why somebody want to come to America. But innovation and entrepreneurship is not uniquely American. It's a bit more in our cultural code to be that way. But I don't think it's going to be that way forever. I think the world is going to globalize. And one of the, just as much as our pop culture seems to be a gift to the rest of the world coming out of Hollywood, one of the side benefits that you're seeing all over the world in many places is that entrepreneurship and innovation is taking root. And so you're seeing innovation hubs and centers all over the world from Berlin to South Africa to Ghana to Australia to Perth in particular, right? Canva, if you're familiar, came out of Perth at Australia. I mean, just amazing things coming out of places that you wouldn't expect. And that trend I think is only going to get more expansive in growth. That's interesting. I've heard you referenced wish-based creative thinking. So how are you using wish-based creative thinking, as you call it, to inspire solutions to massive challenges? So one of the things that frequently comes up with this generation is that they want a company that has meaning. I frequently joke and please no one listening, take offense at this, that a payroll processing company is about as dry a company as you can create. And we don't have college students saying, gosh, I've just come up with a brilliant payroll processing. It just isn't exciting, right? They want something that they feel has meaning. They want to be helping people. They want to be moving a society out of a particular situation or helping the planet or whatever it is. And we all have those wishes, right? Where we want the water to be cleaner. We want people to have better lives. And one of the activities that I frequently do is something I call it I wish. It's innovating wishes into solutions, hackathon, right? So the acronym spells I wish. And what we do is we get a group, I just did this a few couple months ago with some teenagers from some local high schools, we said, what are your wishes? What do you wish about school? Very broad type of thing or the environment or whatever that might look like. And we have them write down their wishes and they're very common, right? We all want to do well in school. We want the opportunity to learn and to achieve and they of course want longer recesses and better food at lunch and you know, these kinds of grand visions. The problem is that's usually where things end, right? It's a wish. And then you're, gosh, I wish I was, you know, I wish I was 10 pounds lighter. No, you're actually don't know what to do with that. Where the change comes in is when you turn that wish into a challenge and it literally, nearly is different. If I say, gosh, I wish I was 10 pounds chowler, 10 pounds lighter, and you reword it in your brain and especially out loud to, how can I make myself 10 pounds lighter? Automatically, my subconscious brain is now thinking. So when we talk about stewing and germinating, if you ask yourself a challenge question, your brain will take over and you'll have that aha moment that we think of it driving in the car because your brain has been thinking about it. And then what we do is with the students, we have them turn those wishes into challenges. It's a simple linguistics change. Say it out loud. And then we say, great, what problems are making this challenge so difficult? And they create, we use design thinking and the creative problem solving processes, right, to, to come up with a problem. And then we say, great, let's use and come up, you know, the same process to come up with solutions.  And what they end up with is a wish that turned into a challenge that turned into a particular problem that they identified. And now they've got a solution for that specific problem. But now everything they come up with will have meaning because it relates directly to a wish that they had at the beginning. And so from a corporate responsibility or a social good element, everyone has those wishes in mind. And allowing students and entrepreneurs to have that kind of connection between meaning and a specific problem and solution really allows for them to dig their teeth into it and apply that creative energy and have some excitement about what they're doing. And that is, that is true. And I think also when you're going through a creative problem solving model, some of which you've just referenced, but also to personalize it, those, the change of the thought process and the question, for example, in what ways might I do everything? Very much so. We are really down to the wire here. Before I conclude, give me a typical mistake that a company makes in dealing with innovation. That's an awful way to close. I'll put the, I'll put the biggest one. They create an innovation department and that's where innovation takes place is over there in, you know, third floor down the hall, right? Innovation is everywhere. Every employee can and should be innovative and the company of tomorrow is going to be looking for employees that will make sure that innovation, entrepreneurship and creativity are not just existing but thriving throughout their companies. David, I think that's a great example. And I think to conclude, I was afraid we'd be concluding on the ugly or the bad, but you just turned it around in your response. So I think our viewers appreciate that. We are down to the wire now. So David, I thank you for being with us and to our viewers, you have been watching the creative life on Think Tech Hawaii with guest David Ochi. A couple of takeaways from today's conversation are that creativity is at the core of creative production and innovation. And an innovation doesn't happen overnight. Innovation requires time and endeavor to generate something innovative that will make a difference. And as David says, innovation doesn't take place down the hall. So join us in two weeks for another edition of the creative life. Until then Aloha. Thank you so much for watching Think Tech Hawaii. If you like what we do, please like us and click the subscribe button on YouTube and the follow button on Vimeo. You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn, and donate to us at thinktechhawaii.com. Mahalo.


Welcome back to the Stevenson 6th annual Mustang Gala. My name is Cameron Summers, and I'm here with KJ Houghton. OK, OK, KJ, what sport do you play here? Play basketball here at Stevenson. What was your most memorable moment of the season? Most memorable moment, most memorable moment probably be our first playoff game. We didn't get the win, but I just enjoyed being out there with the group of guys we had. Last chance to play with a couple of them, and I always cherish the moments. That's good. That's good. Who was your favorite person to play with on the team? Favorite person to play with on the team. That's a couple of them going to hate me, but I'm going to go with Khalil Richardson.  I can't remember right now. Transfer, and he just taught me a lot of stuff on and off the court. Things I always remember. He's like a second brother to me, so I'll always remember that. Now, if I'm not wrong and I've done my research correctly, you're a transfer student as well, right? Yeah, I'm a transfer from Dickinson College in Pennsylvania, definitely, so yeah. How was the transfer process? Transfer was good. Everybody took me in right away.  So I would definitely say good. OK, your outfit looks amazing tonight, and honestly, you're the second interview we've had that has some sneakers on. Yes, sir. It's a pretty bold choice. Yeah, I got to. Was there any inspiration behind it? No inspiration. Just sticking to myself, what I know, what I do. All me, all authentic, so that's all I know. Any words of encouragement for the nominees tonight? Hey, thank you for everything you did. Thank you for just for being here and being an inspiration for us all and for us to keep going and try to be like y'all wanting to get in the woods. OK, KJ, thank you for your time. Hope you enjoy your first gala. Appreciate you, Ken.