Welcome everyone to the Learning Loop podcast where we provide powerful insights and trends into education. I'm Chris, your host. Today's special guest is Heidi. She is an Instructional Technology Coach at Bartlett City Schools. In our session today, we will talk about how CISA is making a difference in classrooms throughout her district. Heidi is a CISA certified educator and has been an advocate for CISA for so many years. Heidi, we are so honored you are here. Welcome to the show. Thank you. I appreciate being invited. Of course, of course. We can't have a podcast show without Heidi here. We are just going to kick off with a pretty basic question here. What are some of the biggest challenges that you see in classrooms in your school district when it comes to instruction and learning in classrooms? I think the biggest thing that I'm noticing across the grade levels is just how does it keep students engaged? How do we keep them motivated? How do we have them stay on task and persevere through whatever the learning task might be? Absolutely. I think that even in a post-COVID world, I think that might have been an issue before is like students to just love learning and really love being in school and really just hook on to that learning in a much deeper level. Is there anything that you're finding in your classrooms? Any strategies or techniques that are helping to overcome some of these challenges you're facing? So I'm finding that having students create while they're learning helps them share what they're learning. And I often having the students get up and share their information on the TV and then talk about what they've done or a strategy to solve a math task engages the other students to then question and you get this kind of going back and forth, back and forth. So I'm not the sage on the stage. I'm in the background directing the guided thinking process, showing different models and then having them work through different strategies. And it really helps them understand that there's more than one way to solve a problem too. Absolutely. Can you elaborate on any specific examples you might share around how you took that sage on a stage model and you stepped away from that? You really allowed students to be creative. Do you have any examples of a time that this happened and maybe your favorite time that this happened? I have two just within the last week. So I'm introducing CSAA to some of the first graders at my one school and they were working on plant parts. And so they had drawings so they were able to take a picture of the drawing and then go into CSAA and start labeling it. And they were so excited about the different ways that they could label and how it could show it and then putting it up on the TV. Hey, look, I learned how to do this. Watch, you can change this color and you can make this here. And look, we can draw with it too. And then adding the microphone in and letting them talk about what they're learning is adds that component then for parents to get involved so that when they're going home, it's not what you do in school today. It's like, hey, mom, can we look at our CSAA and I'll show you what I did. That's really exciting, especially with a younger group. And then today I got to share we're working on the 24 and the global math test challenges. And I got to share with a third grade class different ways to use CSAA as like a whiteboard where they can add their own and draw and share their thoughts and critique each other. So we had students that were up on the Apple TV board and they were showing how they got the different 24 pieces and other students questioning, how did you get that? What did this look like? And then then that you always have that one student is like, Oh, that's how it works. And then others build on that. So I love that part of it. When I taught I use CSAA daily. It was a morning work. It was stations. It was centers. I would put my Google slides into CSAA activities. So while I was showing and teaching a math concept, students were actually looking at it on their iPads and underlining and circling. And again, that family component, not what did you do at school today? But hey, can we go look at your CSAA show me how this works? Because new math is something that isn't really new. It's just different ways of solving it. So amazing, amazing. Such great stories to hear. And I love how you, you really passed that baton to students and said, I'm going to provide you some structure, some guidance, but you really show me what you know in a way that you want to in a way that really fits your, your style and your personality and exactly what you want to convey to me. So the empowerment I'm sure these students really felt that through this, but it also allows them probably to remember this content for a lot longer. So I want to, I want to kind of dive in a little bit deeper to what you shared there. When you used CSAA in your classroom, could you share maybe like the top ways that you found the most power in using it when you were a teacher? Just sharing, you know, you shared a couple of examples, you use it as a whiteboard and how to really project that and use it in different use cases, but could you share maybe two or three of your favorite ways that really you felt impacted your teaching in your classroom? So one of the biggest things that I've learned how to do is when CSAA brought up the formative assessment.  But now that those formative assessments of our math program always has like two little problems at the end of the lesson to see if you've gotten it. And after using the data from that, I'm able to go ahead and group, okay, well, this, these didn't get it. These took three times to get it. These are my ones that are, let's move them on, let's move them on and then develop small groups and stations and centers based on that. That was my favorite way of using it up until I became a coach and now we're, we're sharing that now with more people to help them see the data that's involved in CSAA. But another way that I loved connecting was we used to do the global math test that's on Twitter and the students would get, get their different solutions for whatever they were getting. And then I could just save that CSAA. I didn't have to go in and share their work on Twitter, like with their fixtures and everything. They had it all put together and then I just saved it to Twitter to share out with other students and, and classes that were participating. And I think that's, that's my favorite two ways. Morning work was always great because I could always differentiate morning work and I could have groups set up in CSAA so that my students that were ESL that might have needed to work on something a little bit different, different groups coming in during intervention. I could have them in different groups in CSAA. And they had similar standards, different tasks that went along with those standards. So, so many different ways that you can use CSAA to help students share with a now. Absolutely. So amazing. And I love to hear how deep you understand how to use CSAA and how you're finding that power being connected in with teaching practices, the teaching day and teaching routines. And now you have this tremendous opportunity to take that learning that understanding and share it as an instructional coach. So I just think, you know, your district is off to such a great start having you be that person sharing that information, coaching teachers and really just helping to push the platform move forward and in Bartlett City Schools. So I'm excited to see where you guys go in the next couple of years. I want to kind of zoom out the lens a little bit and think more of a kind of instructional design. We know a lot of districts have a lot of initiatives happening. They have maybe a new curriculum is being adopted or other things like that. How are you as a coach finding the balance between, you know, instructional design and or instructional asks and technology use? How are you kind of finding that balance within your school district? It is a challenge to find because when you're given that new, we just got a new math program this year and a lot of it is learning the new program and how does the online component fit in with the paper and pencil and just trying. I don't as a coach, I don't want to put more on your plate. I want to take some off your plate and show you how different platforms help us share that information that we're getting with the students in an easy manner. So I don't know if that answered your question or not, but just just trying to take it off the plate and seeing how I can. For instance, we're having issues trying to connect with some of the platforms. Well, let's put it on seesaw. Right there it is. So, you know, like we can use it right there. So, look, let's not stress. Let's find a work around it and then we'll get back to the other way and we'll keep trying. But I don't know. Again, I don't know if that answered the question. I think it definitely did because the core of what you said there is you want to save teachers time and give back instructional minutes. And I know when I was a technology coach, that was paramount for me. Like if I can save you time that you can pour back into students that you can actually teach with, you know, that's our number one job is just to make sure that those kids are getting the most instructional minutes. And so even just having that lens is such an important thing to have. And I think it's when you when you shared it, you were really sharing how that's really like your paramount point. That's the only point that really matters is we need to be more efficient. We need to save time and we need to give that back to the kids. So I think that's that's the perfect intersection that you really want to hit, right? Is the balance between instruction and technology. So amazing. I want to jump to our loopy question. This is a question that is just a silly little question that we ask every guest who's here. So we're going to change it and we're going to say it's time for dessert. It's we ate our whole meal. It's time for dessert.  So I would choose Rice Krispie trees because it's a blank campus and you can add in it. You get tired of just the plain rice Krispie tree. Add some M&Ms onto it. You get tired of the M&Ms. Add some sprinkles onto it. So it's the same, but yet it's different. Kind of like seesaw. It's the same, but there's so many things that you can do with it to make it yours. I love that. I love the versatility that you're kind of putting into that question and that answer. Such such a fun one. And I love, I mean, everybody loves Rice Krispie trees, right? We love marshmallows and Rice Krispies. Having that be your blank canvas moving forward is such a good idea. Fantastic. We're going to kind of close up our episode here. We always end with some advice. People who've been listening to this whole episode, they love what you talked about as far as instructional tactics, different techniques that you use seesaw through. If I was a teacher and I wanted to start to be like Heidi, what would you tell this teacher to do first with seesaw to try to build up to where you are today? So I would definitely say get with somebody who uses seesaw and have them help you out. Whether that somebody is somebody in your school next door to you across the street from you or even online, the PD opportunities online to learn about seesaw are amazing. But just know that you can't take it all in at once. It's just step by step. And there are wonderful seesaw lessons that walk you and your students through, how do you use this tool? How do you use this tool? What do you do with this tool? And just one little bite at a time. One little bite at a time. Amazing. Amazing. Spoken like a true veteran and someone who really understands how to deeply get to usage in a tool, start small. Start with some little piece, lean on a mentor and eventually you'll get to where you want to go. So amazing. Heidi, I just want to say thank you so much for taking time here today. Thank you for sharing your expertise with everybody listening. We gleaned a lot of amazing things from this and I know that your expertise is not only a teacher who uses seesaw, but now as an instructional coach is truly going to help your schools move forward. So we're so excited to join you in that with seesaw. We want to thank you for being here today. Thank you for having me. I appreciate it.


You are about to witness an epic Tarot Magnus reaction.  I'm saying, I was Captain Merck for a few days now, I am Mag-L, the Black Kryptonian. And I'm about to react to Superfast trailer. So it's a comedy, it's a Fast and the Furious parody. So let's get this in.  Hopefully this is funny.  All those scary movies sucked, couple of them were funny, but anyway, let's do this. Right, the Rock was gonna be in it, you know, the Rock character, and they put him in there. I'd watch it, I don't know if I go to see it, theater to see it, but it does look funny.  Baby oil, is this shirt tight enough? You kinda sound like him too. Alright y'all, if you liked my reaction, hit the like button.  What about you subscribers? Subscribe.


5 people were arrested as a result of a drug bust at a home in Crowing County. According to the Crowing County Sheriff's Office, the bust happened in the 1,000 block of County Road 16 in Ideal Township. Authorities executed a search warrant at the home shortly before 930 Thursday morning. Over 3 pounds of methamphetamine was located along with a large amount of cash and ammunition. 26-year-old Brianna Rodriguez of Pine River, 59-year-old Doug Melby Jr. of Pequot Lakes, 60-year-old Charles Ford of Bacchus, 52-year-old Richard Kinnenin of Brainerd, and 52-year-old Lisa Moss of Crosby were all arrested in connection to the case. The estimated street value of the meth was over $16,000. Crowing County Sheriff Todd Doll said that these arrests were the result of a continuing investigation and tips from the public.


Okay, so a little bit of change of scenery in the background for today's video because we are actually talking about Ultimate Custom Night, specifically the ports that are coming out. Not gonna lie, probably pretty soon. On January 14th, yes I'm very late to this, like unbelievably late, I'm sorry, Clickteam actually released on their official YouTube page a walk in progress test build for Custom Night running on the Nintendo Switch and oh boy does it look interesting. Ever since it was announced that Custom Night would be getting ported over to consoles and mobile phones, we were all super super interested to see what the controls were gonna be, how it was going to work on these ports. And this video gives us everything we need to know about exactly how Custom Night will work when it's ported from the PC. Now I actually forget everything in the video because like I said it was released nearly actually for you guys over a week ago and I literally haven't watched it since it came out. So we're going to re-watch it and then like usual dive deep into the video and uncover the secrets within. We're just gonna look at the controls really, that's it. So without further ado, Ultimate Custom Night Nintendo Switch gameplay footage. Now I wanna make this very clear, I'm not actually playing. I'm not actually gonna be playing on my Switch in today's video. Like I said, click team release a video that we are going to watch. Whip UCN test footage 01-14-20-20. Let's make sure our volume's up and let's take a look at this suck of test footage Ultimate Custom Night. Here we go. So we're going to watch it through the entirety, okay. Watch it through the entirety and then we'll take a look at it thoroughly. So it's a minute and 20. So not that long, but already off the bat we can see some interesting mechanics. Oh boy. Look we've got the power ups right there, what do we got next? I'll set all to zero. Everyone's at zero already so no point in even doing that. Look at all those challenges that we can do. Yeah. Oh, mail stack one. Oh nice, nice, nice. Oh they're actually going to be playing it and then here's the controls. We're going to get to these a lot later because, oh boy, it's going to take a long time to go through all that. All right, so look at this. Don't mind this up here boys. Don't mind that up there. I'm pretty sure that's just like frames per second or something. Actually no it can't be.  I'm 100% sure that's not going to be in the full release, but yeah that's that. Oh wait a second, that was not in the original game. Oh, I don't think that was in the original one. What is this? Oh great, I wasn't ready for that. What is this? When you turn the heater on, does the screen do that? I don't think it did. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Follow them. All right, so now we can actually take a proper look at this. I think one of the main things that people were interested by is just how the hell they were going to do this. They were going to replicate a cursor on consoles.  All right, so they've got the cursor, right, and that's how you move around. I'm guessing with the, I did this last time when we had, I think it was 5.5.6, switch footage. I got out my Joy-Cons. Let me put them in the controller so it looks better. My Smash Bros controller. Anyway, so I'm guessing you just move around with the joystick here. I'm guessing that's how simple it is. And then A and B right here, that's how you, A is how you increase their difficulty, B is how you decrease. I realize you guys probably can't see this that well. I don't know why I'm bringing it up here. But it helps just in case you guys can't see. Hold Y to use to erase data. Why is it right here? Right near A and B. I don't think, and I think someone said this in the comments, it should not be that easy to erase data. Because if you beat 50-20, you are not going to want to delete all that data, right? If you beat all those challenges, you do not want to erase your data. So I think they should change that. I really do. Yep. There you go. So you just hover over the character, you want to increase or decrease. I'm guessing A you just use to select. Pretty simple. That's usually what it is for most games. You see all the offices there, power-ups, again, A, click on them. That's what I'm guessing anyways. Probably hit A for said all, said all, yep. Go here, hit A, you can see that. One of the things I don't like about Custom Night, and this isn't for the ports, but it's just for Custom Night in general, is that when you make a challenge, you can actually see how much the challenges give you for points. Oh yeah, there's nothing you can do about that. I think we should save this to the end.  Oh, Frank, I dropped my control. So here's the office. I don't know what this is. Someone please tell me what this is. I thought it was frames per second originally, but then I really thought about it. Like, no. And then they started messing around with the cameras, I don't know. Maybe it's a click team thing, I'm guessing, because every time they change scenes, I don't know if that's what they're called. When they went to the cameras, every time they changed the camera, it changed. So I'm guessing that's just like the thing you're seeing on the screen.  I don't use the click team. Sorry, click team. Okay, so we're in the office, and everything looks crystal clean. Everything looks so smooth, which is, I'm honestly surprised they pulled this off. I'm not going to lie. You can see the wine music, the change of music. Yeah, look at this.  Because imagine how precise your movements have to be with the joystick. Unbelievable. Silent ventilation, yep, Kira. I don't, I swear I didn't do this in the original game. Then again, I do have like Ultimate Custom Night PTSD, so maybe my mind just like threw that out the window. How I see, oh, you can hear Nightmare, yep, the get out of the monitor there. You can see Phantom Freddy stalling to make his appearance. Turn on the flashlight, turn on the, there you go. And then, I like how they, they make a note that Nightmare's there. What is this running at, 480? Yikes, click team.  I know I'm playing this for like the 4th time, but just take a look at this. Here to clean, what is left to do? Very creepy, very, very creepy. Alright, yeah, then go follow. Of course I'm going to link their Twitter down in the description along with this video. So I think now it's about time we tackle the controls. I shouldn't be blocking any, I should be right over FunTime, or not FunTime Freddy, but Rockstar Freddy. So now I'm actually going to put these on the actual console so you guys can see it. Okay, so first things first, the thing that everyone is screaming about is the fact that the joy cons on this model are not the same as the joy cons on the actual Switch.  I just like how everyone's getting so pissed off at Click Team for that. It's not a big deal. You know what these are.  They tell you this is the D-pad. Like, stop freaking out. It's not that big of a deal. Alright, anyways, me venting out of the way. Let's see, so left button. I'm pretty sure they're talking about this right here, which is the left button. Right? Left? Yeah, left. So this one, this top button right here, opens the monitor. And then the one on the opposite side, the right button, this one, it opens the mask. Actually, frick, opens the mask. What the heck? Wow, a mask button. Nice. So yeah, use that to open and close the mask. Well, not open and close, but you know what I mean.  Something that really knows me about that, though, is that it's the opposite in game. So you go in here, right? The, well, maybe it's not, they switched it. Click Team, what are you doing? What? They switched it. On the PC, the monitor's over here and the mask is over here. Why would they switch it? Well, thank God there's a button for it now. Because God, can you imagine using the mask over here? Because I cannot. Oh my God, okay, let's go back to the controls. Sorry about that. I didn't realize they switched it in the game as well. I thought they just switched the buttons. And that's what made me mad. But now I'm even more mad because they switched it in game too. It's not that big of a deal, but like, why would you switch it?  I guess you hit down on the joystick to turn everything off. And then, let's see. So now on the D-pad, right here, so I can't see. So the top one is to close the vent. Then the left one is to close the left door, right, right door, and then down is the side vent. I guess that makes sense. That's not that bad. And then on the other side, on these, X button is to catch a fish, close the ad, and wind the music box. Interesting, interesting. I guess that's good so you don't have to use your cursor when you're actually in the camera. OK, so A is the flashlight. B is to cancel. Cancel what? I guess just close out of the game, maybe? I'm not entirely sure. And then Y is to change the music box when dealing with Jiga. Use cursor and the A button right here, or use the right trigger. So the right trigger is this thing right here, not the bumper, but the trigger. And select with the left analog stick, so this one. And then the left trigger, which is this thing right here, again the trigger, not the bumper. And up or down on the D-pad, interesting, to select these. So I'm guessing you hold this down and you select them. Interesting choice.  I do like how we got our two boys here. Rockstar, Freddy and Mr. Hippo represent. Awesome. And I'm pretty sure that's basically it. Yeah, again, go follow them. I know I keep saying it, but you should. So I think that is pretty much everything we have to deal with in today's video. Interesting. I think if there's one word to describe Custom Nightports, it's interesting. And now all we can do is wait. Actually recently, actually, they released FNAF 4 remastered for iOS and Android. So if you have not gotten that, I suggest getting it. It's pretty good. Very good. It's now exactly like the PC version. But yeah, that's it. So thanks for watching. Stay tuned for more news coming soon in the future. I actually have my whole whiteboard here is filled with stuff that I just have not covered yet. So I'm gonna get to that very soon. So thanks for watching. I'll see you all on the flip side. Goodbye.


All right, good morning, CyberTrader. Everybody ready for a wonderful Wednesday? How's everybody doing? Good to see you all. Good to see you, Enzo, Grant, Ken. Good to see you all. Everybody, welcome back. Well, you know what? I was getting a little nervous this morning. I was going back and forth and talking to Josh a little bit. You know, the other instructor, for some of you don't know who he is in YouTube, but we have several instructors here. But we were looking at him and saying, I don't know, what's going on this morning? Looks pretty ugly. Good to see you, Bonnie. Good to see you. Morning to you on YouTube too, also. Good to see you, Jeff, on Cyber Group. I'm like, something's going on. I'm not really seeing that much action. And then all of a sudden, out of nowhere, the LHDX made a big, big pop. I just got out of it. I know I kind of shared a little bit late for it in the Cyber Group room, but I think you guys on YouTube saw it. I kind of missed it here, right around this 815. I got in around, right around here, around 820. I just got out of it. I just got out, right now, I just sold it. And the reason why I got out of it, just want to point this out to some of you here. I don't know if you guys saw this big order right here. Right around here, there was a big iceberg order if like 30,000 shares came in. Right around nine o'clock, around 859, and you got filled a little bit. So you know what, I'm like, you know what? Can't go broke taking the money. I'll buy it back if it starts breaking out. I mean, the more it holds here, the better it is. But as of right now, this is probably the only thing that really has been showing some type of promise. It's starting to trend down. You can see it right there.  It's starting to trend down a little bit. So there might be some profit taking. Once again, the big thing that we teach you here is how to follow the money. And when I saw that big order out there and I saw him get executed, got me a little nervous, a big block order. But you can't go broke taking profits. That's the model we go by and that's the way you got to look at it. All right. So anyway, regarding about what happened yesterday, there were, you know, yesterday was a weird day, okay? So markets down another 100 points today.  And, you know, I'm really getting kind of nervous. Refreshing, I don't know if you guys see that. No problem, you brood's leader. So anyway, again, you see what's happening with this a lot of crisis is going on right now. You got Israel and Hamas that are fighting, I don't know what's going to happen with that, you know, in the Middle East right now. So that is going to open up something. We got to keep an eye on the market. Obviously, you know, now we've got this big cyber attack with the colonial pipeline. Let's see how they're going to handle that.  I didn't even know about the colonial pipeline that ran that far down and handle that much people. But it just goes to show you how, you know, vulnerable you could be, you know, by a cyber attack. And that obviously could trickle into, you know, maybe a lot of cybersecurity companies, but you know what, it's could trickle into something for that could be sticking with us for about another week or two. I don't know exactly what their game plan and they're going to be paying the ransom, I mean, whatever it is, but could it lead into other, you know, shutdowns, whatever it is. But if that happens, we want to be very, very focused on the market. Because remember, the first place it's going to get hit is the stock market. Certain stocks are going to react to it. So I'm going to benefit. So I'm going to take a big catastrophe. And we all know, and you've all been witness of it, what happened when COVID hit? Okay. Something the market literally dropped, you know, over 10,000, 12,000 points like that, you know, in a week. And if you're a day trader, you caught on to that as much as we don't like the catastrophes. Listen, it's part of your job.  We love the freedom. We love the camaraderie. We love the cooking. I mean, I don't know, I don't have a lot of firemen because they're living here in New York. But yeah, you got to go fight a fire.  I didn't know I had to actually go in the Twin Towers and save people.  No, that's your job. You know what I mean? Like that's what you get paid for. Trading is the same thing.   This is your business. So you got to go out there. And unfortunately, I always say, like I guess the news, right? Listen, if everything's rainbows and puppy dogs, no one's going to watch the news. I think the news always wants catastrophe. They always want to make things very dramatic and make things worse than what they are. And that obviously is because that's going to lead you to watch it a little bit more. But trading is the same thing. If everything is great, nothing's going on. This is a market, people won't pay attention to it. But once you start seeing something that's gonna affect it, you got to be very focused. That's what makes a good trader. And this also will make you survive for being a trader for a long time because you can't be in denial and say, well, maybe we'll come back. Maybe the government figures something out.  If you fall in the hope business, which means I hope it's gonna come back. I hope this, you're automatically gonna lose. If you can't use that word, that's the tip of the day. You can never be in a whole strategy. If you start being in a whole mood, you're gonna get in big trouble. All right, so anyway, let's go through some of the stocks that are making some big moves. Obviously, the stock is holding here pretty strong right here. I might consider jumping back into it. Big Iceberg order just came in. The guys who try to hold it down, I see a guy right here at seven just came out. So there's obviously some sellers out there. Listen, as we all know as traders, the longer the stock sits there, the longer trades, the better it is. So the stock's been there for literally, it's been over like seven minutes. So obviously I probably made a mistake selling it. I might wanna consider jumping back in, but the stock looks really strong. Listen, what helps us with the stock also, the stock was a $40 stock. When you look at a chart like this, you know, it's like, it looks a lot promising when the stock was now maybe hit a bottom at five being like, you know what, seven maybe not is a bad deal when less than a month ago, you know, two months ago, the stock was in the $35 price range. We saw that happen with a couple of the stocks yesterday. Ice, a stock that we found early this morning kind of fell out of love with it. Thought we saw the stock run around 540. Don't know what happened here. Kind of like kind of died over here. And then it looked pretty good around seven o'clock. I thought it was gonna make a big push. And then obviously it was holding here, holding here, kind of broke down. So I'm kind of like fell out of heart with it. Might want to pass on that one. We'll see how it opens up. Sometimes they make a move in the morning out of nowhere. So that's what happens. Array, listen, day trading, you know what? You could have saw the writing on the wall, kept breaking lower lows, lower lows, lower lows. I know nobody likes to take a loss, but when the stock broke $35, you know, now look at it. Now you're down to 18. What are you gonna do?  Maybe you got about $16 right around 1650. So the stock can go down on two points, like it or not. So you got to look at the long-term effect on stocks. Sometimes you have to admit when you're wrong, you got to take a loss. Listen, there was an old saying when I first got into the trading business, okay? Even before it was a trading, okay? You know, everyone here when they first got into trading he ended up becoming a stock broker, which I hated. But the one thing I always learned as, you know, being in the brokerage industry is that you could always buy it back cheaper, right? People say, well, eventually I got to pay for it. I got to buy it. Well, listen, ticket charges are free. It's not like back in the old days when you had to pay like $200, $300 a ticket fee to a stock broker. You know what I mean? You could just buy it back cheaper. What's the big deal? So don't worry about that. What else we got going on here? Our, our, our men. You know, the stock had a little bit of a push after hours, the stock went up. I might want, you know, let's see how it opens. Probably put it on the B list. I mean, it's up 24%, 162,000 shares, 65,000 shares. You know, that's one reason why I put it in there. Fubu, this stock obviously was a fun stock. So funny, I was talking to my, my, my hair cutter and he's like, I'm making so much money with Fubu, you know, and I'm like, take it, take it. This was when it was at like, he had a lot like $20 and it was at 40 and he held on to it and it just went right back down. And then it went right back up. He goes, Fausto, I'm not going to make that same mistake. You told me to sell it, I'm going to get out. Then I got a haircut again. He goes, damn it. Why'd you make me sell it to stock with the 50? Well, guess what? I got to get another haircut with him. We'll see how he's doing now. But I think he probably happy the second time now he got out of it. But Fubu, very interesting stock. You know what?  Any RV, I don't know what happened. The stock had a nice push right around, you're right at the market. I guess it looks like more of an earnings that it came out to go from 220 to 320, but she saw the trend down. So even though you might see it on your watch list and say, well, you know what? The stock looks like, you know, it's up 16%. It's in a big percentage gainers list. You know what? Not looking too well right now. Trend is down. The trend is your friend. Don't buck the trend. All right?  We had the market down. We had a lot of stocks that made big comebacks. There was a big bounce. And remember, I told Jason, listen, the rate of the markets going looks like a short. You know what? I was 100% wrong because at the gate, anything you bought, you made money on. But guess what? They all came back down. Every single one of them.   That was bad. A really nice move from 65 to 72. I'm just looking at some. Roblox actually did really well yesterday. I've got to mention, but these stocks are a little bit more expensive. What else? Draft King, I mean, look, they all popped, but they all came back down. You know, they had this big run up right here. And then right around 10 o'clock, they just came crashing down. Every stock kind of did the same exact thing yesterday. So, I mean, I'm still very skeptical about the market.  Boeing's not doing too well too. Be a lot of stocks. I mean, listen, this could be a really, really interesting type of a market with all these things, these current events that are happening in today in the market. So, we'll see how Congress and, you know, our government handles it. Or, and let's also see how the streets gonna react to it. And all we have to do is be very, very prepared. One question, what is your output on Naked D? The NAKD, like I said, I just, you know, it was on, it was gonna be on my watch list. I kind of took it off because it had a nice push yesterday, but it's not going anywhere, okay?  You know what I mean? You got big, big support levels right around, right around here on this stock right here. But the thing is this, we don't trade dollars, anything under a dollar, okay? Stock was fun with the whole Reddit thing and the whole Wall Street bets, but this stock is pretty much done. It's not really going anywhere. You know, unless you know something, you like the company, you want it as an investment, but it's not really, you know, it looks like it's making low lows in my opinion. So, but I don't know anything about it as much because we don't trade anything under a dollar because we're dealing with tens of a penny, you're dealing with, you know, a bunch of different things which are not that important. All right guys, anything else that we're looking at? Yeah, the only thing, you know, by the way, Grant, the only thing I see regarding about that one stock, you know, is that it's trying to go up, it's got a nice little push right here and it's now starting to take sellers out. It's starting to take sellers out. It should have held on to it, but listen, I'm replying it back. Money's money at the end of the day, but it does look pretty damn strong where it's moving right now. All right guys, so let's just get ready for the market open up. We got about 15 minutes. Let's go fill up, let's go get our coffees. It's great for the market opened up. If you're watching us on YouTube and you want to come and join us, just click on the bottom, like us, friend us, put some comments down if you have any questions. Also, if you want to just join us for a week, do a trial for $9. What do you have to lose, you know? Worst case happen, you get your money back if you don't like it. But for everybody else in the cyber group room, new trial members, hopefully enjoying it, like remember I told you, don't buy anything, just watch the other traders and see how they do. Cause remember, it's not about what we're doing, it's about how they're thinking because you need to know if this is for you or not. And the worst thing that can happen, if it's not, that's okay, you know? And cyber traders, like anything else, you see something, you say something because two heads are better than one. Good luck, everyone, happy trading and we'll start commentaring once the market opens up. Be safe.


Dwi'n gweld David Buckley. David sefydlu yn cael ei foddon o'r university. Prydu cîn a'r Llyfrgell, great hon i ni, a ddo i'r wythnos yn y ffroed, y'r wythnos yn y mewn lŷn cyfnod cyfnod cyfnod. Fy nid yw'r ffroed yma hynny os ydynt. Prydiau lle ar y cyfnod cyfnod cyfnod yw cael Renid. Felly rydw i'r ffordd ar gyfer oherwydd yng Nghaerdydd. Felly mae'n rwyf i'n meddwl i'r strategaidd Eru Yn'r Besin. Ie ddweud y maen nhw'n cymdeithasol yn ei ddweud y bydd. Ac mae'n gweithio ar gyfer y fawr, a'r adabtyfytu. Mae'n meddwl yn LHCI, yma yw y cymdeithasol, a'r adabtyfydd yn ei ddweud y bydd y cymdeithaeth. Mae'n cymdeithasol yn dda i'r cymdeithasol. Mae'r adabtyfytu yn y ddweud. Gwneud yn cyfrifiad, mae'n gallu ei ddwyllfa yma, i'w ddwyllfa yma, i'r argymau, i'n credu ei ddweud. I'm not doing a PhD in graphics. This is sort of advanced interfaces group realm more. So that would be research in rendering and shaders and stuff like that. And this is Unreal Tournament. There's research going into bots and artificial intelligence in the world. And I'm not doing that either. That's artificial intelligence. I'm doing machine learning, which is very similar, but it's slightly different. And this is Portal. It's one game of the year. This is a fantastic game, innovative, loads of great game mechanics. And it's also not what I'm doing. This is for game designers. This is more commercial stuff than what I'm doing. And this is Left 4 Dead. This is a zombie survival game where the players have to get to an end goal. And I actually am doing a little bit of this. So in Left 4 Dead there's an AI director which controls some of the game content. It monitors the players, it monitors the intensity of the game, and adjusts it accordingly. And this is what I'm doing. So why should we be adapting games? Well, everyone has different preferences. People are different tastes in music in the same way they are different tastes in games. Some players like racing games and some players like first person shooters. In fact players can have different preferences in the same genre. So players of World of Warcraft can like hitting things or they might like go collecting things or selling things. So by adapting the game we can increase the audience. People also have different skill levels. So some people are better than others, some people are terrible. So it would be great if we can adapt the game to account for that as well. So if a game is too hard we need to decrease frustration. Now that's just one example how we can adapt the game. And at the end of the day why shouldn't we adapt the game? We have machine learning techniques which can learn players' opinions, how players like things. And the games we run on computers. So why not? The next question is what can we adapt? So here's a big list or a short list actually of things that you can adapt. And I'm going to be looking at four of these just for now to give you an idea of what you can adapt. So Enemies is the first one. Here's a screenshot of a game, Black Mesa, in which you have a few enemies in the distance. Nice and easy, straightforward. What happens if you've got a tank and three turrets? What are you going to do? And this is an example of how changing the enemies can change the game, how changing the frequency of your opponent and the types of enemies that you see. We can also adapt the weapons, the weapon types, when they appear, where they appear. Here we go. This is another screenshot of Black Mesa. You have a giant fish and you've got to shoot it with a crossbow. Not too difficult. What if you have a crowbar? So that's how changing where the weapons appear can change the game. You can also change the levels, so people have different preferences in games. So this is an example of where you have to navigate a lot of tripmines in case the whole world explodes basically. So you can either do that or you actually might just enjoy jumping over platforms. That's a different type of level. So we could adapt the frequency in which these types of levels appear in the game. Finally, difficulty. This is a bit harder to show with screenshots, but this has been present for a while in games. It's been known as dynamic difficulty adjustment, trying to change how the game is played by people to make it harder or easier for players depending on how good they are. You could change how the damage is inflicted or received, or you could change all the components that I've just talked about to change the difficulty. So more enemies obviously means a harder game, for instance. So some examples of adaptivity include adaptive doom, which some of you might have heard of. Jonathan Roberts is working here in the department and he's been working on creating random doom levels to try and figure out what combination of these weapons, levels, players like. So Matt Ulter, the number of enemies that you might have, all the different types, the combinations, and then try and figure out using machine learning what you actually like. Next, here's an example of the Galactic Arms Race game, which is part of a research project in evolutionary algorithms. So evolutionary algorithms in machine learning are similar to the biological idea in which small mutations happen. So in this case, the weapons are changed slightly to produce different concepts. So a player can select over a long period of time what sort of weapons they like by trying out different things and the computer can infer what they actually like. Max Payne is an early example of dynamic difficulty adjustment. Aim assist could be enabled automatically, as well as changing how much damage the player was doing, depending on how well you were doing in the game. I've already mentioned Left 4 Dead, but here is a graph that Valve produced in their presentation about how the AI director works. So on the top row, we have a population that the game would like to put out, how many monsters it had over a period of time. So on the left, we have a cluster of monsters and then a few minutes later, you might have another cluster. The second row is what the AI director thinks that the intensity should be like. So the relaxed areas are where it would like to relax the game, make it easy, and then it spikes it again, lots of monsters. So the final row is the combination of the two, trying to adjust the number of monsters essentially. That's a simple example of adaptivity. There are two parts to adaptivity in games. The first one is player modelling, the second is optimisation. So this first part is trying to figure out what the player is feeling. If we don't know what the player is feeling, how can we adapt the game? So we have to create some kind of model based on what the player is feeling. So we do this via data collection. There are different ways of doing this, first of which might be physiological data. We could plug someone up to a machine, measure their heart rate, respiration, sweat, stuff like that, except it's very intrusive and it's quite noisy as well at times. So another way might be observing people. We can watch players as they're playing a game. That's a bit more difficult with video game players, because they all sit like this. So an alternative is asking them directly, but then we have the problem of people might lie, people might not know how they feel. And this all falls under the category of human interaction and trying to figure out how players, whether players are enjoying themselves or not. Log files are a key to this. If we can record what the players are doing and somehow attribute that to how players are feeling, so watching what they're doing, we can then perhaps automatically determine whether they're enjoying themselves or not. Examples of the data you might record are low-level data might be a mouse movement or key presses. A high-level data might be the number of kills you get or the number of interactions you have with another player. The second step, optimization, is using the player model that we've got and trying to adjust the emotions that they're feeling. So here's a small example of an algorithm we might use to optimise the game. You get someone to play a level, you work out what they're feeling using one of the previous techniques we discussed. You then change the level slightly, use our model to determine whether the player will now enjoy this more or less. And then if it is, we've done it right. If not, we have to adjust the level again. And you could just keep repeating this to try and make the level better and better. Examples of the application of this in research today include Mario. So an open-source version of Mario has been used to try and do some player modelling, trying to figure out six different emotions of players. So they've tried to model frustration, predictability, anxiety, difficulty, for instance, and then using that to then optimise the game. So on the right, we have a game with lots of gaps and a game with lots of enemies. So by using those emotions, we can just flip from one to the other depending on what the response might be. They also do some feature selection to determine which of these features are most important. So it might be the case that the direction the player is going is a very important feature. On the other hand, it might be the case that lots of shells might be very important to note. And they do some analysis of this, so they try and figure out the behaviour and the correlation between how a player is feeling and what it's recording, essentially, which is very interesting to my research particularly. And then secondly, I'd like to discuss the Playware platform. It's not a video game, but the principles apply. So in this testbed, there are several tiles, which a child, for instance, might interact with.  So an example game might be something equivalent to Whack-a-Mall where you hit a mall with a hammer. So you can measure the interactions between the player and the game. So measuring how hard they're pressing the tile, for instance, might indicate that they're having lots of fun. Or they're very frustrated, maybe. So they do a little bit of optimisation with this platform, trying to optimise the emotions which you've already modelled using the game. So, this is essentially applied to me to science. One example of the modules that is very applicable to this is Comp24111, which some of you might be doing or have done, the machine learning module. So you learn some future selection in that with the digit data. You also do some SVMs as well, and that's very important, very integral to the research I'm doing. You also mention neural networks as well, and all of this correlates very strongly with this sort of research. But also it goes into further depth, having a look at different learning algorithms, such as active learning, which Jonathan Roberts is using in his project. Another example of a module which is very important is the image processing module, in which we have here representations of levels in 2D. So we've got a very open level on the right and a level with more corridors on the left. So you could represent these in any number of ways, but here's just two examples. In image processing techniques, you can work out, for instance, how wide the corridors are using granularity techniques, or try eroding or diffusing to try and figure out features that might be important. So my research in particular is focusing on first person shooters, multiplayer first person shooters. So an example of that is Team Fortress 2 here on the right, which is quite popular these days. In particular, I'm focusing on the levels in a multiplayer first person shooter, known as a map in this area. This is the architecture or the area that you play in. So it includes things like walls, ceilings, mountains that might be in the way. If we can explore that, we can find out what sort of features might be interesting. So here's an example of a map. There's a small room with a control point. These are all features of the map that might be very interesting to measure. One key aspect that I'll be exploring in my PhD is log files. We have to figure out what sort of features, what things are interesting in this log file. So that's where feature selection and feature extraction are important, because mouse movement might be really integral to what a player is feeling. So if a player is moving a mouse wildly, that would be really excited, but we don't know that and no one's had a look at it yet. So that's where we have to do research into that. And we also have to do feature extraction to try and find more high-level examples that we can record. So this is the architecture of my research. On the left, we can see the satisfaction model, and this is the player modelling part of the research. And on the right, we have the optimisation stage, where the feedback happens, where the map model or the model of the player's preference for a particular level is fed back into the generator, which gives you the more optimal map. So as you can see, the player plays the game, which produces a log file. On the very left, you might just make out a little file with a Q in, and that's the questionnaire. So we need to figure out what features of the log file are important, and by doing that we'd ask a player initially. But hopefully over time we'd be able to remove the need for that questionnaire so that further research can go on without having to ask anything of the player and just read it all from a log file somewhere. Finally, these are the challenges that my research and research in this field face. So, as I've already mentioned, we need to find the features in a log file, and that's quite a difficult task, particularly if actually nothing is correlated, and that's quite hard to work out. If we've got a multiplayer game, we have to be able to model multiple players at the same time, because everyone might be feeling something different, and we might be playing the same map, but not everyone might like that map, so you have to work that out. In addition, we have to be able to distinguish between the feeling you might have for an opponent and the feeling you have for a level.  If you're playing on a map you hate, but you like the people, maybe you'll enjoy it. So you have to be able to determine the difference between those, and that's a challenge we face. The representation of levels is important. As people who have studied machine learning might know, the more features you have, the more complicated the machine learning side is. It becomes slower, it becomes harder, it becomes more fuzzy. So we have to be able to represent the levels compactly while describing them thoroughly. Finally, your preference changes over time. So like in music, you might like human music when you're 15, and you might like rap when you're 20. But by the time you're 40 you might be listening to classical music. So we have to be able to determine which levels you like at a particular moment in time. Because you might like going from first-person shooters to role-playing games, and we have to be able to account for that. And that's it. Are there any questions? Yes? I personally love the frustration in my games, because people give me the sort of challenge for myself to get better at it. Like, super made boy. I start with something. So how would you sort of account for that? Like people sort of admit preferences for the difficulty that they like? There are player types. So some players might have different preferences. So you might like frustration. So when we were doing our data collection, when we're asking questions, we can ask whether they enjoyed the game, and ask them whether they were frustrated. Or they might fall under a particular type of player. There's also possibly, I was talking about recently with someone, might be two different types of frustration. A frustration with yourself, because you can't complete something, and a frustration with the game, which is not usually very enjoyable. Like if you're playing something and it's a terrible game, it's not fun. Exactly. Yes? How generic are the models that you can create for the first-plus shooters? Does it only work with one specific game? Or could it work with, is it reasonably adaptable, but you can use it with other first-plus shooters? It depends on the data we use. So if we managed to get the low-level data to work, things that are common among lots of first-plus shooters, then it would be very generic. So mouse movement, key presses. We'd have to do research to make sure that it does actually apply to different games, because even first-plus shooters have very different mechanics. So Counter Strike Source has its very mechanic base, so if you make one-to-one mistake, that could be it for you. Whereas something like Team Fortress 2 I posted an example of before, it's much more forgiving. So there might be differences that we'd have to account for. There you go. These profiles you create are these transparent between different genres of computer games? Like if there's a sports simulation, is somebody who plays a sports simulation likely to have the same behavior on a first-plus shooter? So it's a similar response. Yes and no. There are player types, as I mentioned, so there are four player types, apparently, in the gaming world, together, and you will generally fall under one or maybe two of these at one time. So you will behave similarly with respect to the players, but you might do different things if that makes sense. So you'd have to adapt the model, essentially, the player model to the game as well, particularly if you're going between genres. In terms of feelings about the levels and the players, could you just discuss some of the ideas that you've been considering for that? Sorry, can you repeat the question? In terms of the feelings for the players and the levels, the difference in them, could you just discuss some of the ideas that you've been considering for that, as in how to differentiate between the two? Between the two... Feelings for the... Oh, I see, right, okay, yeah. Yeah. So, at the moment, I've been considering... Well, one of the ways to get around this is to increase the number of games you play, particularly against other players, so changing the diversity between players. And if you find correlations between particular players, so if you play a player over different maps and you always feel the same, then it's likely that it's the play you don't like rather than that. That's one of the risks I have with my research. It might be the case that it's too hard to actually do that. So, in which case we'd have to take a step back again and have a look at it again. Shall I give that a feature and say that none of the offensive words end the player? Yes, yes, absolutely. But on the other hand, it might be the case that you just frustrated the game and you're swearing at everyone anyway. Yep. So, you did this with your PhD? Yes. And you're going to try a thesis? About video games, yes. But at the end of your thesis you're going to have some conclusions based on some evidence which is scientifically proven. It's interesting that a lot of the motivation here is about how people feel. What kind of population of players are you going to need to do this research on to really substantiate some concrete conclusions in your thesis? A couple of hundred, probably. Hopefully less. So, Jonathan Roberts got at least 100 players playing his game online. So, one of the stages of this research is to release it online so people can play from wherever and whenever, which will certainly increase the number of players and hopefully validate the claims. But then we obviously get into the issue of people lying and having to do crowd sourcing essentially of the data. Yes, does that answer the question? Yep. Fantastic. Thank you, David. If you're interested in all these research talks that are going online, so if you just google Manchester Research showcase all this talk and the subsequent ones are online. Next week's talk is going to be from Alan Spokes who's going to be talking about sensor networks. Come on if you're interested. Join me in thanking David.


Hello and welcome to NewsClick. Today we are going to talk about the Ayushman Bharat Health Insurance Scheme which was announced recently and to talk on the issue we have with us from people's health movement Dr. Amit Singh Gupta. Welcome to NewsClick, sir. So first of all this scheme, they are claiming, the government, Modi government is claiming that this is the largest health insurance scheme in the world. What do you think about that? How valid is that claim? Well, just by claiming that the scheme is the largest, it doesn't become largest. We have evidence of schemes outside India which are much larger, for example, in China. But that's not the point. If you see within our country, you have the national health mission, which was earlier the national rural health mission, which has been running for about a decade or more than a decade. And the annual expenditure on that is around 35,000 crores, 30 to 35,000 crores, which is the central allocation. And over and above that, each state also makes some allocation. Now, according to the Finance Ministry, the annual allocation for the Ayushman Bharat scheme will be 12,000 crores. But we don't know whether that allocation will ever be made, because in this budget, an allocation of only 2,000 crores has been made. So, how can it be claimed that a 2,000 crore or at best a 12,000 crore scheme is larger than an already functioning scheme, which consumes 3 to 4 to 5 times that money, which has been running for a decade? So, this is one part of the claims that are being made about the scheme. The second part is that this will change the public health sector, especially for the poor of this country. How valid do you think that point is? See, we need to understand what this scheme really aims to do. Now, this is not a new scheme in the sense that similar schemes have existed in the country from about the early 2000s. The first similar scheme was the Aurogyrshri scheme in Andhra Pradesh. And since then, there have been many state-level schemes that have been rolled out and the national-level scheme, which is called the RSBY scheme that has been rolled out. Now, all these schemes, we have to understand and underline, are only for hospital-based care, which means that outpatient care is not covered by this. And the actual treatment under the scheme is provided by a mix of private facilities and public facilities who are part of the empaneled list of facilities. Overwhelmingly, going by past experience, the empaneled facilities are private. So, essentially, it is a privately provided hospital-based care that is supported by public money, which means you are my money. Now, when we say that this will benefit the people who need it the most, you have to keep in mind the fact that there are districts in the country where in most of the areas, there are neither public nor private facilities. So, irrespective of whether somebody is designated as a beneficiary, if there are no facilities, then it is in that sense quite meaningless to actually have this scheme. And as I said earlier, it also leaves out a very large number of people who are spending from their pockets on outpatient care, sometimes for chronic diseases for months or even years or lifelong, who will not be covered by the scheme because they are not hospitalized. So, whether it is a cancer patient, TB patients, people of diabetes or various other chronic diseases. So, to believe that this will actually solve all the healthcare problems of the people is unrealistic and especially it will not address the healthcare problems of those who need it most, which is the poor and the poor who live in most distant areas, which are the most underserved areas. This scheme, sir, is an insurance-based scheme. And this model, insurance model, when it comes to health, it has been like there have been evidence that it is a failure. Could you tell us a little bit about it? So, we have had a decade and a half of experience within the country. And in fact, there is a lot of international experience of very similar kinds. And what we know is that in an insurance-based scheme where you have mixed treatment, the facilities that provide treatment can either be public or private. So, mixed provision. There is overwhelming presence of the private sector in provision as in India. Now, what we have seen in India is that a section of the private facilities have utilized the scheme to profiteer, not just make legitimate profit, but profiteer, and actually provide treatment that is not required, do procedures that are not required, do investigations that are not required just in order to get the insurance money, which actually acts as a burden on the insurance system itself. It then pushes up the premium that is required to be paid with the government pays. But more importantly, we have seen evidence of extreme forms of malpractice. So, for example, in Chhattisgarh, Bihar, Jharkhand, there have been reports of unnecessary hysterectomy operations, removal of the uterus. In some areas, the incidence of hysterectomy operations almost overnight increased by 50 times. And these procedures were being done even in girls as young as 22 to 23 year old. Clearly, these were operations that were being done, not because they were needed, but because the hospitals stood to gain out of unnecessary operations. So, this has been one big problem with the insurance-based scheme, especially in a situation when there is almost no regulation of the private sector. So, to believe that an unregulated private sector, which is empaneled, will provide rational care of good quality and would cost reasonably, is not borne out by the facts. So, that is one part of it. The other, as we were also discussing, is it leaves out a lot of people, majority of people who do not access hospital care. And the third is that, again, the experience has shown that enrollment rates have been low. And even when people are enrolled, they have limited knowledge about what they can actually claim. And as we were saying earlier that it means nothing, even if they are enrolled, if you do not have facilities existing, because this scheme will not build facilities. It is only going to make use of existing facilities. There is nothing in this scheme that will contribute to actually building facilities. And the big gap that we have in India is that facilities just do not exist outside the cities, outside the periphery of the cities, in most parts of rural India. So, what you would be expecting is they would have to come to the district towns, to the capital cities to get treatment. So, sir, according to you, what is the alternate to such schemes? So, this is not rocket science. We know from experience all over the world that these success stories of public health have all been success stories of systems that are largely or almost entirely public. So, if you look at, say, in Europe, if you look at France or the UK or Italy, they largely public, almost entirely public systems. Cuba is, of course, an example that you have. Nearer home, you have Sri Lanka. You have Thailand now. You have Malaysia. Sri Lanka, a very close neighbor, 90% of hospital beds are in the public sector. And it is not an accident that Sri Lanka in the region has by far the best figures in terms of infant mortality, child mortality, etc. Not just hospital care. There are many other things that Sri Lanka has done, but it just shows that a public system contributes to good health. So, what we would argue is that instead of spending public money in strengthening the private sector, which this insurance base scheme is planning to do, the 12,000 crores that the government may spend next year, we don't know, or what many experts say that actually if you want to cover the number of people, 50 crore people that is being projected, you would need at least 50,000 crores. So, if really the government is going to spend that much of money, it is much better spent in creating assets, in creating facilities, in training medical personnel. Today, 50% of doctors are trained in private colleges of dubious quality. We have a shortage, not just with specialists on one side, we have a shortage of health workers who are properly trained. We don't pay our health workers. We have Asha workers who work for 20 to 24 hours, 28 hours a week, and they are called volunteers. So, if really we want healthcare to be available to the majority of the Indian people, there is no shortcut. It has to involve public investment and creation of public assets. That's what we should be doing rather than working on a system that tries to subsidize and strengthen the private sector with public money. Thank you for sharing your views with us, sir. Thank you for watching NewsClick.


For more videos on people's struggles, please subscribe to our YouTube channel. I think it is also important to mention that there is a third vaccine in the pipeline which is Mambiza which is intranasal. So as anybody who's worked in health knows that this in itself is quite exciting because intranasal is easy to give you just have to put drops in the nose. So wherever you have lack of health workforce or the shortage of health workforce, there also you can administer this particular vaccine easily. You can go for door to door vaccination with that. You can give it basically in low resource settings. So though that is still in the initial stages of clinical trials, but that is another very promising candidate that has come from Cuba. There are five vaccine candidates with Cuba and they all have their own importance and coming from the global south, this is an achievement, a big achievement that Cuba has. So what we have to understand is the context in which Cuba has produced these vaccines. Firstly, just facing US blockade since 1962. And what does the blockade mean in practical terms? It means that you are not able to trade with other countries easily because US blocks it. And even if you trade, you get all that material at very very expensive rates. So which means Cuba finds it really difficult to get a state of the art technologies from other countries when where they have been developed or reagents, good quality, raw material and everything. Within that context, Cuba has been able to produce five vaccines, which have their own different advantages within 18 months of the pandemic. This achievement has to be seen in this context completely. But then also the question is how it has been able to do it because other countries, no other country has achieved this feat. And that is because of the very way Cuba does its science or goes for its scientific discoveries, which is a very collaborative we are working. So the vaccines have been developed by two institutes, CIGP and Finland Institute in Cuba. So the scientists from both the institutes have always been in communication with each other. They had weekly meetings, every week they were sharing information. And what that meant was that if you have a stumbling block and one of the scientists or the institutes, if they have been able to overcome it, the other institute does not have to go through the entire process if they face the same challenge. Now this may sound like a very obvious thing to do that that's how you need to work. But that does not happen in the capitalist world. And if you look at US, which is 90 nautical miles from Cuba, the kind of competitive way in which their institutes work, the private sector especially, but also their public sector, there the idea is that you compete with each other and therefore you keep all your scientific success and discoveries secret. And therefore you don't learn from each other. And therefore we see that using the proteins of unit technology, Cuba's vaccines are among the first that have hit the market. The other private companies which are in competition are Novavax and Sonofi and all. It is only Novavax which has reached phase three trials and released data just a few days before Cuba. So despite spending so much of money, they could reach only there, whereas Cuba has been able to do such fantastic work. And that is and they have five vaccines, Novavax has one. So let us not forget that. And they have been able to do it with their idea of collaboration. And then collaboration does not end only at producing and finally coming up with these vaccines. Because collaborative research by its very nature is anti-monopolistic, right? There's many institutes involved, there are many people involved, there is government involved. So when you do that, you are not asking for monopoly rights over these vaccines, compared to again, if we look at the US, look at Pfizer's vaccine or Johnson & Johnson's vaccine. So Pfizer vaccine should have been called American vaccine, right? Because it was the initial discovery came in the public institutes of America. But no, because the monopoly rights are with the company. So it went on to become companies property and is not accessible to everyone. And that is the monopoly right that Cuba's very way of doing science breaks. And therefore we are seeing there is so much of excitement in the global south. Just last week, Progressive International had this summit on vaccine internationalism, which was attended by a lot of countries, governments, Argentina, Mexico, Cuba, of course, Bolivia. And the Indian state of Kerala was a part of it. Kenya's one province, Kisimo was a part of it. And all these countries have come together to ensure that they have access to vaccines, which they have been denied. Just if we look at the data from our world and data, till June 22, 53% of United States was vaccinated with at least one shot of one of the COVID vaccines. European Union, 47%. African continent, 2.7%. DRC, Democratic Republic of Congo, which has one of the best, I mean, which has a lot of natural resources and a country full of other kinds of resources, had 0.05% of its population vaccinated with one person. So this is the unique quantity we are talking about. And therefore, the countries in the south did realize that they have to come together to do something. And basically, they have to have their own vaccines and they have to vaccinate their own people. The north has completely failed them. In that context, a summit happened and it could take place and there are things that they are trying to do. And that is because there are vaccines and Cuban vaccines, of course, in Mexico has also one vaccine candidate. So that's really good. Cuba is, in one sense, leading the global south and somewhere fighting against vaccine inequality that we see. So it's a fight against capitalism in short.


Industrial man began life by crafting a few products, then little by little, threw himself into their mass production. Then he started to think about people's diverse needs, and started to design products that were tailored to meeting these needs. Then he tackled quality. As he creates objects that are more and more able to take over the responsibilities of people, man asks himself, are they really safe? Now sorcerers apprentice style engineering was no longer acceptable. The population demanded guarantees. The safety engineering and management program aims to train engineers who are able to design and manufacture safe products and to provide assurances about safety levels. Transport, industrial installations, construction, all sectors are affected. All actors are involved, product designers, their manufacturers, users, but also authorities who issue permits, and the directors of companies who take responsibility in the event of an accident. The safety engineer works at the interface of all these groups. He or she now plays a key role in the organization. This person must be multi-skilled, both as an engineer and as a manager. That is why the SIEM training program addresses many topics. No one would expect safety levels for an aircraft or an industrial facility to be different in different countries. And as safety is frequently governed by standards that reflects internationally agreed requirements or best practices, the SIEM program is run in English and is aimed at participants from all continents. We offer two modes of training. The first is face-to-face sessions on INSAS campuses that lead to the award of a diploma. Or you can use our online resources, which give you access to international experts from multiple sectors at a time that suits you tailored to your needs.


Hi everyone. Happy New Year. I'm Joe for jasphyscasebreaks.com coming at you with 2021 Bowman Draft Baseball, Jumbo Edition, 8-Box Jumbo Edition. Pick your team number five. Remember, six sold out after five or before five. So if you're looking for six, that's in last night's video on Monday. Today is Tuesday, January 4th, 2022. And we've got some break credit we're giving away as well. So if you got at least two teams, you've got a chance. And yeah, if you win a team, that counts too. So if you got a little rooftop next to your name, that means you won a team. And if that counts as your second team, it does count. So thanks everyone for getting in. Appreciate it. Jeremy L ended up with last spot mojo with the Cleveland Guardians before he pulled teams out for the filler. So thanks everyone for making this happen. Anyone here in this break watching live right now with me? Here we go. Good luck, everybody. Oh, yeah, Redmond's here with the with the team that he won, your Cubs. There you go. Good luck. Rex is asking if I could switch bodies with one person on the planet for one day, who would it be? And what would I do? It would obviously be Usain Bolt and I would run. I'd read the vocal chords here because I think it would just be amazing to be able to run that fast and so effortlessly. I'd be incredible. You know, like I probably run like a 10-5-40 to be able to run as fast as, you know, to be able to run as fast as Usain Bolt. That would be incredible. Just to experience that feeling, that exhilaration. Here we go. Now for the pick your teams. We stated in the description that paper base won't ship except for these three players right here. Marcelo Meyer for the Boston Red Sox, Colton Couser for the Baltimore Orioles, and your number one overall pick, Henry Davis for the Pittsburgh Pirates. We've got Tyler McDonough, Purple Paper to 250. That'll be for EA and the Red Sox. And we've got Rykelvin DeCastro, Purple Chrome to 250 for the Blue Jays, EA with the Bluebirds, and we've got Hunter Goodman for the Purple Mountains Majesty. That'll be for Daniel and the Colorado Rockies. Now in the interest of time, I'm not going to be sleeving all of those cards, but we're going to put them in a different stack. So our sorting and shipping team will be able to take care of that. We've got another jumbo case to do directly after this, so we're already a little bit on the later side of our evening, so we want to get to that one as quickly as possible. And all those Hunter, or Henry Davis paper will go to Mark Passette and the Pirates. We've got Austin Love, Orange Paper, 24 out of 25 for the STL. That is going to go to Jeremy. And we've got Harry Ford, not Henry Ford, Harry Ford, the Invicta cards, which can be numbered as well. Can they be autographed? Maybe. King's at Lakers on in the background. Lakers taking a 43 to 38 lead after a little slow start in the first quarter. And we've got a Blue Wave, Ben Casperius, 137 out of 150. Right, so it upsets you, they left out Wicks Leiter and Tarantos for the Cubs. It shouldn't upset you because that's traditionally what they do every year. You know, there'll be a section of players that'll be in draft and then there'll be a section of players that will be in the next Bowman release. No surprises there, or shouldn't be anyway. Now we saw our first Super Factor the other day, Adley Rushman, but we have not seen a Super Factor autograph. We'll get a big name Super Factor autograph, that would be pretty cool. That Dodger's Blue Wave autograph goes to Martin, who won that spot in the filler. And Jordan McCants is your third autograph of the box. Do you think the 2021 draft was being 2021? No, I mean obviously, Rex, you've been doing this long enough to know that the second round pick, the second overall pick always is in the next Bowman product, Bowman baseball product. They've been doing that for years. And the number one overall pick, and some of the other top picks are in Bowman draft. There's Chase Petty, Speckle, Sparkle, Speckle. We've got an Orange Francisco Alvarez, 7 out of 25 for the Mets. That will be for Karen and the Mets. First box in the books. Yeah, I do a recap, so you should be able to see it in the previous break. I think it was Picker Team 4, whatever I did last night. And I'll do an autograph recap at the end of this as well. Next box. Honestly, I don't remember if Wix was a first rounder. I actually do have the draft class open. Nice, Spectra is down to four. That'll be a great break to add tomorrow. So let's fill that up and add it to the schedule. Looking at the draft class, Henry Davis was one. Jack Leiter, two. It's Al Leiter's son, I believe. Jackson Job, three. Marcelo Meyer, four. Colton Towser, five. Oh, there's Jordan Wix. Out of Kansas State, 21st overall. Onwards. We've got Luis Matos, blue chrome to 150 for the Giants. That's going to be for Arthur King. And there's Tanner Allen, 129 out of 250. Purple chrome auto for the fish. That's for Martin and the Marlins. Colton Towser for the O's. That's all goes to Chad Prince. Harry Ford and Victor. That's a cool insert that they added. And a Bryce Miller autograph for the Mariners. EA with the M's. Nice, fourth round pick. Jordan Groeschans, blue paper to 150 for the Blue Jays. EA for the Jays. Next little stack. There's Marcelo Meyer for Boston and EA. CJ Abrams. And we've got a green autograph. Calvin Ziegler, 18 out of 99 for the New York Mets. That's going to go to Karen P. Second round pick. Always good to get some color with those autographs. Colton Towser for Baltimore. And Brett Beatty to 499 for the Mets. Maximo Acosta, green to 99 for the Rangers. That'll be for Karen. Another box done. What are some of the big rookie names we're looking for this upcoming season? Hopefully we don't lose too much of the regular season with the lockout and everything. I think Bobby Whit Jr. should be a rookie, right? I think he'll probably barring any setback. I feel like he should be playing day one. I think Joey Bart rookie cards were last year. Adley Rushman, maybe? His rookie cards might be this year. He should be probably starting from day one. Same with Bobby Whit Jr. Also if they hammer out those service time, playing service time issues in the collective bargaining agreement. And in fact, hopefully owners and the players union are talking now. Because I remember they said before Christmas, I think they said, yeah. There were some little talks, I want to say, but I think significant talks won't start happening until the new year. Now well, we're in our first full business week of the new year. So hopefully they're on top of that so we don't lose too much baseball. You get the last bits of, I think there's still a few big free agent names still sitting around as well. So that's got to get taken care of. All right, next box, Brennan Davis, Speckle. Is Brennan Davis going to get called up this year? Is he going to be a rookie? There's Andy Rodriguez, is 79. Green Speckle for the Pirates. Mark Bissette with the buckos. And then our autograph is Christian and Carnassion Strand. Twins, that'll be for Daniel Becker in Minnesota. We've got a JT Schwartz purple paper, 204 out of 250 for the Mets. Another Henry Davis paper. Jay Allen and Victor. There's an Angel Martinez. So 499 for Cleveland, that'll be for Jeremy. And then here's a Tannen Allen, Tanner Allen. 104 out of 499, Tannen, like Biff Tannen? No, Tanner Allen. Miami Marlins, Martin with Miami. Marlins, good alliteration there. Before the end of the season, they were saying Brennan most likely would be June of 2022. All right, so hopefully they'll get some rookie cards of his into next year's sets. Real-time saying, I can't help but think service time manipulation can only go so far when you have a father who pitched in the major as a well-versed in terms, negotiable, like Bobby Whit, yeah. Well, I mean, it's not really his, I mean, if it all stays the same, it's not really his choice, though. There's really no negotiating you can do. If they say, we don't want to call you up until after a month into the season, as the current rules stand, then you don't get called up. But I feel like that's something they're going to try to change in the collective bargaining rim. That probably has to be one of the bigger issues on the table, especially after the whole drama between Cameron, drama between Chris Bryant and the Cubs organization. There's Nick York to 199 for Boston. Were Wander Franco rookie cards last year, or are they coming up this year? Kind of blanking on that. And we've got another Tanner, but this time, Taylor Bebe. That is for Jeremy and the Cleveland Guardians. Last spot, Mojo strikes again. Cleveland, this is for you. Tanner autographs. We've got a Jaden Hill, purple chrome to 250. Eric Pena and some paper. Real time saying, okay, I guess my assumption in the server time manipulation was about what a team claimed the player was being paid is doubted. I've built a transition with the same discuss, so they have a 650,000 for five years. I'm not quite sure I'm understanding what you're saying. I think that, I think it's really not necessarily doubting what a player is being paid or success. I think they think that, like for example, that's why you see it happen with Chris, Brian, Bobby with Junior. Like if they think it's a good player, they don't want to call him up too early because then they could hit free agency a season earlier. So they've, so owners have been able, GMs have been able to kind of game the system where if it's like, oh, they figured out, oh, if I don't call up this player until like a month and a half into the season, then the way the service time days are set, they won't hit free agency until the following, like another season after that. So they're essentially able to get another season of control of a young upcoming star. That's where that usually comes into play. I don't know what the exact days and stuff are, but I think that's the general thing. That's Yellow, Lava, 7-9, 75, Adrian Del Castillo for the Diamondbacks. That's for Mark and we've got Ryan Webb, 499 Refractor Autograph for Cleveland. I think the Bucks have released Antonio Brown, Chris. That means they already have a contract. Well, they're on their, they're on the arbitration contracts. Not even arbitration. I think Bobby with Junior maybe just paid like whatever the minimum is for that, which is maybe $500,000 or something like that.  And then at that point, that's when they can sign whatever contract they can in free agency. So by that point, Bobby with Junior, for example, may already be like five or six years into his career.  So the team is essentially getting a deal for a number of years, which is something that players have not really liked, how many years of team control they have. Another Ryan Webb, this time just a base autograph for Jeremy. Cleveland, this is for you. Yeah, Martin, you bought the Marlin straight up. That was a good call. Good pick. There's Gunnar Henderson to $199 for the Orioles. That'll be for Chad. Another Marcello Meyer for Boston. We've got a Henry Davis as well for the Pirates. Next stack. Jackson Joe to $4.99 for the Tigers. That'll be for Chad. And this is this cool looking card here. Gold wave autograph, 30 out of 50 Ryan Spikes. That's for Anthony and the Tampa Bay Rays. It's a sharp looking card. And that's our third autograph of this box. Let's see if we can find some other parallels. Pedro Paneta, nice. Aqua, Lava to $199 for the A's. That'll be for Daniel, Daniel Becker. All right, we are halfway through this break, boys and girls. All right, another four boxes to go. Good luck. Hopefully the lockout won't be too long. I want to miss too much regular season baseball. I think last I looked this up, the Major League Baseball and the owners were trying to create some sort of wacky wild card system in an attempt to expand the playoffs, which I didn't like. So hopefully that'll be able to not do that. Now I know that the expansion of the playoffs will probably be, will probably be, sorry, lost my trans thought here. There's Maximo Acosta. Oh, I figured the playoffs will probably be expanded, but the way they were doing it, where you could pick your opponents and stuff like that, I think that's a little too goofy for me. I really shouldn't have to fiddle with it too much. There's Pedro Leone, purple, a purple greens speckle to $99. And a nice Colton Couser, Bowman first autograph. That'll be for Chad Prince and the Orioles. That is your fifth overall pick out of Sam Houston State. Nice. You got a Matthew Nelson to $4.99. Now, yeah, I think you're right Rex. I think there's inevitably going to be, unless they figure out in the next two weeks, but I think there may be at least some interruptions in spring training. So we'll see. Yeah, real time. Yeah, for bonus babies like Bobby Wood Jr., who probably got big bonuses, I don't think they're really, I don't think he's not going to be really hurting for money early on in the season. But the service time stuff really affects players like, I don't know, that maybe weren't, maybe didn't get the big bonuses. There's Lonnie White Jr., 27 out of 150, Alec Thomas to $1.99 for Mark and the Snakes. Some of the bigger names will always, will always get those nice bonuses, but there's a lot of players that, if you're like a second round pick or something like that, that bonus drops, that bonus amount drops significantly. They don't get paid too much while they're in the minors on minor league deals. And when they get called up, usually the major league deal isn't that much more significant. What's the big hits in this? Well, honestly, I mean, it could be anybody, right? This is Bowman Draft. So they're Shailin Polanco, blue paper to $1.50. So you never know which one of these players can turn out to be a high value superstar. So there's a ton of long term value in this. But I think currently there are a few players, obviously the top picks like Henry Davis, number one overall pick, are going to be the more immediate chases, but Bowman's unique in that, that even if it's not those high draft picks, if Frank Mazzicato for the Kansas City Royals ends up blasting me into a stud, this could be seventh overall pick, but still, never know it could be this guy. Royals, that'll be for Cody Kennedy who won a spot in the filler itself and then won the Royals, got an autograph of a top 10 pick. And then obviously anything low numbered, you know, you want to see in this stuff as well, especially for big, hard, heavy products like this. It was Gunnar Henderson, purple chrome to $2.50 onwards. And like I said, I'll do an autograph recap at the end of this. One of the comedian Titus, Christopher Titus is? No, I don't. That's the name sounds familiar. Knowing Rex, it's probably someone from the 90s and maybe had a stint on SNL. Or had a, maybe had a short run but critically acclaimed TV show. Sorry, Jacob Steinmetz, 22 out of 71, Speckle for Mark Bassett and the Diamondbacks. Third round pick. I think he's been getting a lot of attention because he aims to become the first Orthodox Jew to reach the majors, which would be pretty cool. Of course, he started in the 90s, Rex. Yeah. I don't think you'd reference anybody that wasn't from the 90s. And he probably has some new thing going on which triggers your 90s nostalgia. 15 out of 25, Rykelvin DeCastro, Orange Chrome for EA and the Blue Jays. Oh, he's doing a stand-up tour, I see. Nice. Let me know how that goes. Maybe, Rex, you'll be, you'll witness him. I don't know, it's always, I always wonder what it would be like to be part of a viral event. There's Victor Mesa Jr. Not viral as in COVID, but viral as in a meme-worthy event, something like that. What if you were involved with this Christopher Titus guy saying something super controversial and you'll be like, yeah, I was at that show? Can you imagine being at, I don't know, what would a... When Michael Richards, Kramer from Seinfeld, can you imagine being at that comedy club that night when he was dropping n-bombs? There's Jordan at VRs for Philadelphia. That'll be for Mark Bassett. I mean, terrible moment slash great story-worthy moment. He's like, remember when that happened? I was there. I was at that comedy club that night. From my understanding from what happened back then is that I think it was just a random night. I don't know if it was like a, it's just a small comedy club in LA, I think, and it wasn't really anything where a lot of comics was trying out materials or something like that. So Rex, maybe you'll be, you'll be witness to something like that. You know, and you can put in a report to like TMZ. TMZ, live from Fort Wayne. 90s comic, Chris Titus. Christopher Titus goes bananas and unloads on a member of the crowd. Rex was there and he gives us the report. Yeah, he just started going off on this guy. What would be, what can I say, that's offensive but not that offensive? Like he was making fun of homeless people. Like, what gives? They made fun of the disabled guy in the front row in his wheelchair. That was terrible. There was Sal Freelick, 29 out of 75. It's a cool looking parallel black border there for Robert Throne and the brew crew. Rex was like, I was there and everyone was like, ooh. That was very cringy. Well, yeah, that's exactly why he went off. He was being heckled. But I don't know, if you're a professional stand-up, probably been heckled a lot. Probably better ways to handle that. And there's Brooks Goswin, speckled. But yeah, I mean, he didn't say it out of the blue. He was definitely being heckled, but this is a very poor way of handling it. We've got Brady House, Aqua Lava at $1.99 for Washington Chris, a parent with the nets. Titus is one of those controversial comics? Well, it can't be that controversial. I haven't heard of him until now. But maybe it's time. Maybe he wants to be controversial. Maybe he's like, I got to get on the map. Fort Wayne is where I'm going to do it. You have not seen a single Braves auto in like 12 cases of this? Well, we've only done... This is only our fifth case. Oh, I mean, I'm assuming you're watching the other guys too. Are there Braves on the checklist? Maybe we're due. You've only seen three comedians before. Bill Cosby, George Carlin, Adam Sandler slash Rob Snyder. Well, that's four. Unless you're just rolling Adam Sandler and Rob Snyder as one person. Yeah, I don't think I'm not a go-see-a-comedy-show guy. That is not my thing. I don't think I've ever seen a stand-up performance. No, I have seen. I saw... I saw Carrot Top. It was a college event. I saw Carrot Top at a college event. And it was like an on-campus event and it was like free or something like that. I mean, it had to be before drinking age. Otherwise, I wouldn't have gone. It's pretty funny, actually. There's a brainer, Bonacci. Speckle to 9 out of 99 on that one. Kind of hard to see the number. They're hiding right there behind all the speckles. EA. And then our autograph is for the STL, Ryan Holgate. You like Carrot Top? I mean, I'm ambivalent about Carrot Top. I really don't. I would never go pay to see him or go out of my way to see him. It's Carson Williams, 21 out of 99. Green paper for the Rays. But I suppose if I just ran into Carrot Top and he was doing a bit, I'd be like, alright, there he is. Run out of steam a little bit here. And we've got a green autograph. We have Carson Williams, 2 out of 99. That is for Anthony and the Tampa Bay Rays. How could I not love Carrot Top?  I don't know. I mean, it's just... But I remember being like, alright, that show's okay. It's not too bad. It's Joe Mack to 499. I don't think I've ever seen impractical jokers, but I absolutely hated whose line is this anyway. I remember an old college roommate maybe of mine would watch that religiously and he would sit there cackling as if it was the funniest thing in the world. And it's just like... Yeah, that's basically watching above average high school improv classes. And I was like, no thanks. It was the same basic improv exercises that you would do all the time. And I'd be like, nope, that's pretty lame. This is Robert Gasser to 250. Purple paper for the Padres. This is Carter Jensen. So I think Bradley Beale would be a good addition for the Lakers? I don't know how they'd ever make the money work, that would be almost impossible. Cody Kennedy with the Royals. Yes, there you go Rex. Now we're on the... You can kind of see where my humor is. Kids in the Hall was fantastic. Although I honestly haven't seen that show in a while. I don't know if it still holds up today. But I enjoyed Kids in the Hall. I remember enjoying... I remember... And I haven't seen Mr. Show in a while, but Mr. Show is another one that... That was pretty good with Bob and David Cross, I think, who was eventually in Arrested Development. A show that I really like. Arrested Development is another good one. Alright, Last Box. Got to take a quick breather after this, but almost there. Let's do the Last Box. We'll give away some money. We'll do an autograph recap. Turn out some labels, blah, blah, blah. And go from there. Real Time is all about Impractical Jokers. An actual real time competition that makes you do and say things to stranger you lose in public places. Yeah, I'm not about... I'm not into that. I know a lot of people like it. I know it does well, but not into it. I don't like prank shows. I don't like Impractical Jokers. That kind of stuff doesn't really do it for me. Let's go. You got Adrian Del Castillo to 150 paper for the Diamondbacks. Got to Max Meyer to 150. I think he was a high round draft pick right third overall. Marlins may have a sneaky good starting rotation. Marty and the Marlins. There's Eric Sarantola, blue wave. Bowman first autograph, 90 out of 150 for the Royals, Cody Kennedy with Kansas City. All right, next stack. There's the autograph, Robert Gasser. What does he throw? Gas. That's what he throws. Ben Smith with the Padres. It's the second round pick. Jumping Jack Flash. It's a gas, gas, gas. There's another Colton Couser Oriole for Chad. Another Henry Davis for Mark and the Pirates. Yeah, it'd be nice if the Lakers could play like this all the time. They've been hanging tough in spite of a lot of injuries and whatnot. Sorry about that. There's Ben Casperius, 143 out of 199. Aqua Lava autograph for Martin and the Dodgers. Won that spot in the filler. Fifth round pick. That was your third and final autograph. Now let's see if we can find some low numbered parallels perhaps before we close down this break. We've got Maxima Costa, 20 out of 499 for the Rangers. That's going to go to Karen P. We've got Ronnie Maurizio, Aqua Lava to 199 for the Mets. I think that's also Karen. Yes, also for Karen. And that, my friends, is that. All right, pretty solid break here. Give me a minute to keep the video running and we're going to give away some money. After we give away some money, then we are going to do a quick little recap. So let's flip back to this screen right over here and let's gather everybody's names and alphabetize them by your first name. Now if you bought at least two teams and basically by an even number of teams you got a chance to break credit. Top 500 bucks each. Anthony bought two, that's an entry. Chad bought two, that's an entry. Daniel bought two, that's an entry. EA bought four, that's two entries. Jeremy bought two, that's an entry. Karen bought two, that's an entry. Mark got four, that's two entries. Marty ended up with three for the purpose of the promo. Two count, that's still an entry. And Robert and Ryan did not get two. That's actually not that odd. Let me just double check this again really quick. Anthony, Becker, EA, Jeremy. Karen, Mark B, Marty. There's only ten spots here. So top five after ten half of this list we'll get a hundred bucks each after two and a one three times. One, good luck. Two and three easy times. After three we've got Marty. Mark, Mark, EA and Daniel Becker. Congrats to the top five. Thanks for getting in. I'm Joe for jasphyscasebreaks.com. Check your emails for those, I almost stopped the video before going through the recap. I am Joe for jasphyscasebreaks.com and I'll see you in the next video for the next break. And then more Bowman draft in the stores so check it out on jasphyscasebreaks.com. Thanks for watching. I'll see you next time for the next one. Bye-bye.