to our watch along of Charlie, the Mali-Alam film from 2015. If you're seeing this on YouTube, you're seeing a very cut up version because of copyright reasons. If you'd like to see the full and cut version though, you can have it on Patreon, I'll put it in the description below in the pinned comment. So you can go check those out. And at the end of this part, we will talk about the film and review it for your enjoyment if you'd like to, if you care to know our thoughts on it, which I assume you at least kind of do because you're watching this. Or you're not and you accidentally click on it and you're like, why am I here? That could happen as well. But anyways, let's just get into this. Okay. Back into this. Because we've already seen most of it. I do these all at the beginning. Here we go. The old Irish goodbye. What would they call it when you leave without telling anybody? Oh, my. If you don't get it, drop that bus stop right now. So you're not planning to leave, are you? I'm not planning to leave. I'm planning to forget all this when I wake up. You have kids, don't you? Or is it a joke? Not even a kilo. A doctor. Hey! Now tell me all the details. Tell me if you've seen enough of the test. I'll be there in a while. Let me find out. I'm Shruti. Shruti Ram. Who else are you waiting for? I'm coming from Veer. I don't know where your Tessa is.  I'll find out. Who is this Tessa? Did he leave you and run away? We didn't see that.  But we thought he was a thief. He's not a real thief, Tessa. Then straight to Pushkar. So, let's take a photo together. Okay? Yeah, I know. So are they banging or what? Yeah, they definitely are. So Christ is banging somebody? So you think... I think there was a lot of evidence was pointing to he was a Christ-like, keep one, Kerala, very Christian state of India. So if it's not out of the realm of possibility, you said they would have a, I don't know if it's Christ-themed, but a Christ-like character in one of their movies. But then she put her shoulder on him from like, so Christ is banging somebody now. Wait, wasn't there a, that was Da Vinci code, right? That was Da Vinci code. Oh, is this interweaving? I don't think so. Oh, okay. I don't think so. You don't think so? You don't think he was a Christ figure? There was lots of hints. I mean, I can see... Tons. Kerala's for sure. Yeah, you don't think he was like a... But I don't think it was like retelling of the Christ story. No, it's not a retelling. I think he's playing a Christ figure though. Yeah, okay. I mean, he did a lot of just helping people and... Totally. Or saving them or... A lot of his goals were definitely... There was... To save people. There was... Definitely righteous anger in there. He talked about either Christ or him or my father a lot. He also then did the... Over the head. That's like a really iconic Christ photo with the thing. Also, it looks way more like Jesus than any Western depiction of Jesus ever would, by the way. Except he's way too gorgeous for to be actual Jesus. Anyways, so that part at the end threw me for a little... Plus, it was just he was supposed to be like Christ. Yeah. And he could bang as well. Not a lot of banging for Christ in the Bible. From what I've read. I don't think he was in Song of Solomon. Those were the other people in the story. But yeah, I think that was definitely... It was evident from the beginning until the very end that he was some type of... He was, at minimum, a depiction of somebody who is of Christ. Jesus Christ, though, if you will. Yeah, I could see that more than like... Well, that's what I was saying. He's just, he's playing a Christ figure. I don't think he was... I don't think they're telling Jesus' story. Like modern day Jesus. No. I just think he's playing like Christ-like figure and they did a lot of parallels of him talking in a certain way that I still... I'm confused by the end. Are they banging? Are we allowing Jesus to bang? I don't know. The skirt really stuck on the Jesus thing. I just think it's... Are we allowing Jesus to... Well, in normal Jesus stories, they would frown upon Jesus banging because that's, you know, we both grew up in the church. That's a sin. Yeah, Jesus doesn't sex. No sex for the man. Anyways, yeah, I... I liked it. I thought it was really cute. I don't know if it's much of a romance, though. Yeah, I think more of my takeaway was like... He's out here helping so many other people and he's putting himself on the back burner due to fear of letting himself be taken care of, letting himself be loved. He's doing that for all these people and he never stays in one place too long. He has all these relationships, but if he stays, they could go south and then what will he do? So he's constantly on the move. He has all these places that are home, but not really home because he doesn't stay long enough. He has all these people that love him and care for him, but don't really even really know him because he's not long enough there for them to actually know who he is. So I think one of the big things is he brings this lady, but 70 years, and then he's like, if someone knew where she was, couldn't I have met her sooner? And what would my life have been if she didn't become a nun and I didn't spend my whole life waiting for her? Like, don't do the same things I did, like that type of thing. And then the other is like in a world full of like millions and millions of people, you can find your person. Yeah. I think she stuck on the Jesus thing, but I do see the parallels you're talking about. Well, I think there's absolutely that involved, but I think at minimum, heavy undertones of he wanted this person to also emulate Christ because it wasn't, I mean, he'd helped a thief, the young Alice, thief, see the young Alice, he hang out with any hookers. No. No, okay. But obviously he helped the kid. Yeah, also like, that's his child. His 12 year old baby. She was done worse, for sure. Yeah. Why do you think she didn't immediately tell him her name? I think for her personal fear, I mean, I think it was, it was just like why, she's been searching and searching for him and he's been running and running from her. Why would she just be like, it's me, please be with me? I also thought that was another kind of parallel because for you to seek out and follow him, kind of a parallel kind of thing.  This is not actually, I was confused for a second. And then that was a. But I mean, like technically she did go and follow him. Follow him to the sheets.  I thought they both did really, really well. Dolcor Shaman, I thought he did. I loved his apartment. Yeah, apartment's great. I would like to, they should make it and put it on Airbnb. I'd like that. And I thought she did a great job as well. I believed her the entire time. I loved her luck, loved his luck, very me. Tessa. Tessa as, why do you think they kept bringing back her family though? I don't understand that. Like even at the end, it almost seemed irrelevant. Right, like she didn't go back for the wedding or anything. Well, maybe it's like, you know, like. That almost seemed like an irrelevant aspect to me.  Exactly, exactly. Have sex with Jesus, that's what we're saying. I live to offend Christians. Sorry. But yeah, I just didn't understand that, especially the end. Like obviously I understand the, she's a free spirit and her family doesn't want that and want hers to live, want her to get married to who, but she's like a free spirit. I get that. But like bringing it back at the end and then not really do anything with it was kind of strange to me. I do think it was weird because at the beginning she did seem to have such a strong relationship with her grandma and her grandma was the only one that really accepted her and like they were both the weird girls. And then she's in the hospital and she's like, well, grandma, sometimes you gotta be in the hospital, but I gotta. Yeah, they didn't address that. That's why I thought that in part, I thought they were gonna be, there was something else that was gonna. Right, like she was gonna go back to the wedding or something. Yeah, something. And they just didn't touch on it again. So I thought that was weird. Yeah. Yeah, that was probably the strangest part to me. But I mean, yeah, forsaking all others. Yeah, I guess. I don't know, man. And Charlie, I feel like that might mean Christ. Because in LJP's films, what was that one? His have a lot of like Christian parallels to him. There was one that was like, oh no, let's just look up. It came out until the 15th. It's probably Charlie Malia Lalam meaning, I did not understand the movie of 2015 Malia Lalam. How did Charlie get a selfie with Tessa? This person says, it was not Tessa who chased after Charlie and chose Charlie as her love. It was Charlie who chose her as his love from the beginning of the story where Tessa runs away from the house and takes a ride with a scooter guy who's another, we obviously saw that at the very beginning. He made her run behind him, leaving clues. Also, he was carrying a tree. Yeah, yeah. The tree of life. That's interesting. Did you pick up that? Did I think it was him leaving clues? I mean, I guess it would make sense because he's the one that made the phone call to his apartment. Yeah, that's true. He kept calling until she answered and then was like, do with this stuff what you want. Whereas she never, she wanted somebody else to come and clean it and it wasn't until that phone call that she started dealing with it and found the other stuff. And I mean, all the people in the boat were people that she eventually met. You turned into a mermaid. Runs over to avoid getting married and rents a room just to give you context. She's dressed in traditional, say that, Sarah? Syrian Christian Chatham on duty. I don't know what that means. A guy gives her a lift on a motorbike. The audience needs to know who the good Samaritan is at the end of the movie is really true. Yeah, obviously. Oh, gotcha. So they're just explaining how he got the things. He's a magician, obviously, and he did that. I didn't pick up on the fact, if that's true, you guys could tell us. This is, I'm just reading an internet thing. But. I mean, I guess it could be turned that way as well, but I mean, how could he know just by those clues that she would seek him out? Oh, he is Christ. She might have just been like, pfft, lano. That's an interesting one for sure, that theory. Because that's not something I picked up on. Yeah. If that is, in fact, the case. You guys let us know if that's what you, if you think that is the case of, he was the one that was orchestrating everything in terms of. Yeah. And then everything would make a difference. The cat and mouse play was actually him just. I could see it. If you watched it again, you might be able to pick up on a little more of how he did that. But, yeah. But I also thought the visually, the film was really, really pretty. Yes, it was. So the cinematographer. Definitely an artistic treat. Really beautiful. The shots and the lighting department of this were top notch. Beautiful, beautiful. And the songs as well. The songs were beautiful. I loved the music. Especially liked the song where they were both dancing. And I found it very charming that both of them had very beautiful, flowy costumes for it. Cause I feel like oftentimes it's just the girls, but he had a beautiful, flowy red skirt and I loved it. Yeah, I liked the, I liked that. All the songs were really, really pretty. And it was very gosho, by the way. I did pick one. Composer was Gobi Sundar. And Godesh Chana Express. Chana Express? The Chana Express? No, he did something else on Chana Express. What, I don't know, but he was involved in some way in Chana Express. Which we did a watch all enough, so you can go check that out. He did. I was there. Now I'm rethinking everything to see if it was him doing the orchestrating of everything. I loved the song that was basically like a girl's romance novel. That's the one I was talking about. Is that the one you were talking about? Yeah, essentially if you go like in a bookstore in like the female porn section. This is what they call female literature. Totally.  Yeah. It was a lot of that, which I really appreciate it. I loved Subin as usual. He's so great. He is. He's an absolutely fantastic actor. Oh, that was him too, the one with that guy. We've seen him a lot in my video on films before. Chamban Vinod Jose. I've heard a lot about this movie and it was really nice, I really enjoyed it all. It was unique. It was, it kept you, I don't, I mean, I get it, they did end up in the end together. You didn't want them to? No, no, no, no, not that. I wanted them to. I just wouldn't, I don't know if I'd classify it as a romance. Obviously they end up it together at the end, but like it's a lot of just looking. So I don't know if that's, and it's not even their story. Normally it's like in terms of like what we're seeing a lot. We're seeing his backstory or her picking up the pieces of his backstory. I get that, that's romantic. Could I mean, I guess the other end of like if it was him leaving the clues all along, like he has. It could be romantic, that's true. He has orchestrated his story in a way for her that by the time that they meet, she is just in love with him. That is very true. That if he was the orchestrator, then it is very romantic. That is true, except for the sex trafficking part. That's not very romantic. It's good. But it wasn't him. Oh, I know. I just, that segment's not romantic. True. It's just justice. Well, not good enough justice for sure. Not good enough justice. Yeah, that was nice. I'm rethinking everything. Not there. It's definitely a thinker. I definitely think there's, even if it's all that, I can't be the only one to pick up on.  Well, I mean, even in the apartment there was, there's a stairway to a picture of heaven.  Yeah, there is. There definitely is. And I totally see that. So maybe he wanted to make a romance film with parallels of a guy that has Jesus qualities about him. Yeah, maybe. Maybe he's a Christian and he's actually doing what Christians are supposed to do and try to emulate Christ, maybe. Yeah. I don't see a lot of those. Don't see a lot of those. Yeah, let us know what you think of it. Yeah, I mean, I definitely think that this is one that you could probably watch. Yeah, for sure. And pull out new things every time, because there's so much artistically going on. So in the shots, in the art, in the background, in all of those different things, I'm sure every time you watch it, you'd pick something else up. Yeah, and I love their performances. I've loved every time we've seen them on screen, both actors. Yeah, it was very good. And Subin, always, always super. I love him so much.  Oh, yeah. Aparna, which she looks familiar. She might just look like Prank a little bit. Chopra. But yeah, I knew who you were thinking of. Okay, cool. But yeah, I really enjoyed it. I would definitely watch it again.  The guy in the other movie that he directed that we saw, the twinsman, he produced it. Good on you, mate. Anyways, I hope you enjoyed our watch along as much as we enjoyed it. I know sometimes we were just staring at the screen, but. And for real life, I feel like we watched a movie recently. It was like, Mr. and Mrs. D'Souza. Like it was like, I can hear the voice. Anyways. Well, you guys are gonna learn something else. No, I don't know. I definitely won't remember those names, for sure. But if you saw us on YouTube, or if you saw a very cut version, if you'd like to see the full uncut version of this in other films, Mali Alam Ones as well. You can have it on Patreon, up on the link in the description below in the pinned comment. Let us know what our next Parvathi and Dolkar Salman films we should watch, which we are next Mali Alam Watch Along with Steph O'Reck. Let us know what that should be. And if you think Christ is banging. Let us know down below.


It's Fisher f***ing dumb. I'm sorry. Fisher are very unintelligent animals. You would be the ideal candidate for this humane meat. Would it be cruel for me to take your life from you for a sandwich? Me is halal, being vegan is just a mental thing. This guy's crazy. You have this mental ideology that push veganism amongst people. You have a contradiction. No, that's very good. That's actually a very good argument. That's a very intelligent argument. I'm actually surprised. Hi, my name is Joey Carbstrong. I'm a vegan who has spent the last seven years trying to convince people that animal cruelty is wrong, without as much success as I hoped. So I thought I'd try a new, completely opposite approach. I'd pretend to support animal cruelty and harness the power of reverse psychology. You're deleting your brainwalk. What? This is how it went. What's going on, bro? Coming in. What do you think of the sign? Well, I actually have two questions for you first. First, I think definitions are important. What do you think animal cruelty is? Let's just use an example, like, take chickens. Right. I think chickens are pretty sentient. Like, they're like birds or whatever. They've got pain receptors in the brain and that. You know, they've got a spinal cord connected to the brain and nerve endings and things like this. And they experience the world. I would say taking a chicken, putting them in a factory farm, making them grow really fast, and then putting them in a slaughterhouse and eating them. I would call that cruelty. I honestly don't think that... I don't think there's anything wrong with it. And most people here don't think there's anything wrong with it either, because they will pay for it. Well, you know, that's interesting that you say that. Because I noticed while I was waiting to talk with you, your cameraman over there has a vegan tattoo. I know. And you got a tattoo on your ear that says Megan, but the M is with Sharpie, so I think it says vegan. So, I think what you're doing is... You're too smart for your own good, buddy. What can I say? I'm a very observant individual. Are you a meat eater? Yes, I am. And what did you first think when you saw the sign? I thought it was an abhorrent message, certainly. You know the example I gave you of animal cruelty, right? Yeah. The example is one that most people here in London and the world... Right. ...most of the world support. So, they must... They either think it's wrong and they support it with their dollar, or they're just acting in discord with their beliefs. I think it might be the latter. I'd say it is a bit hypocritical. I'm a migrant worker, and I come from Seattle originally. I'm from the PCC, which is all local. If cruelty is inflicting unnecessary suffering to an animal, cruelty-free meats. It's much harder to maintain that at London, but when I am in Seattle, I try to eat cruelty-free when I can. Let me ask you this. You're free-ranging. You look pretty cheery. Yep.  Of course. You would be the ideal candidate for this humane meat. That is fair.  If you did it with, like, a morphine shot in a way that would be painless. I think if I did not have a concept of life and death, certainly, but... Just you right now. I'm just saying, like, would it be cruel for me to take your life from you for a sandwich? I think that that would be cruel, but how... I do also think... Sorry, let me figure out for myself. It is hard. Because, you know, you've already exposed a bit of a double standard there. There is a definite double standard. I certainly think that with... I don't support factory farming at all. I think... Well, you do. Well, I do. You don't in your belief, but you do in your actions. That is fair. That is fair. I think society doesn't really. It's very hard unless you're kind of well-established in an area where you can get local cruelty-free meats to... We just established you wouldn't be cruelty-free if I killed you for a sandwich. So why is it okay for a cow? Because they don't have a concept of life and death.  They don't know that they're living. They just know pain. They know hunger. They don't have more complex systems like that. Yeah, but not all humans can. So are you opening the door for human meat, are you? And the caveat is if you don't understand complex systems. Well, humans have a much higher... Our brains are much more advanced than, let's say, a cow's. And I think there are some animals where it's much...  Elephants, even pigs. I think there's a definite argument for the pigs. I'm saying that if you're more intelligent, you shouldn't kill them based on intelligence. Yes, and if they're less intelligent, you shouldn't kill them in a way that's painful and going to cause unnecessary suffering.  Yes. And the smart animals let them live. It's a bit of a strawman, but yeah. Well, okay, I don't want to misrepresent your position. I just said it in a more blunt, simplistic way. Indeed, indeed, but it is a bit more nuanced than that.  But that is a bit of a strawman because that's a more blunt way to put it, a more simplistic way to put it where there's a bit more nuance. Well, they don't have a... So if there were human beings... Yes. Let's create a hypothetical... Right. That had the same thought process as a cow. I think you're sort of underwriting the complexity of a cow. You don't know much about cow intelligence, maybe. But even if you didn't... That's a bit of an ad hominem, but I'll... And because you said pigs, right? Right. And cows and pigs aren't too dissimilar. They are completely separate. They're not even in... They're not intellect. The only thing they share about them is that they're mammals. They're very... They're two separate types of... Well, I don't think a cow and a dog are dissimilar in the way they learn or intelligence. They are pretty dissimilar. In what way? Their neurologies are completely different. Yeah, but I mean like in the way that they learn. Like a cow can learn their name, they can... They can get happy and excited, can learn to sit, can learn to turn on taps, can open doors. Yeah, but it's a... What level of intelligence do you need to be smarter than a dog? Well, that's like... That's for instance equating like let's say a TI-84 and a... I don't know, an iPhone. They both can do very similar things.  So let's just say a cow is here.  I think that there's a bit more of a separation there. So let's just say this is the graph. Right. Dogs are here, where are cows? And where's your line to kill? What? There's no unit. You're not providing units with your hand. Well, I mean that's the only way I can visualize. That's fair.  A cow's got to be the threshold. You don't eat, you must not eat pigs. No, I don't eat pigs. Don't about it for a sec. At all? I have eaten pigs in the past before, but... You have a rule not to eat pigs at all? No. And I'm Jewish. And you're Jewish? That's a pretty good reason. That's a pretty good reason. Okay, no worries. So it's not because they're smart? Well, I think it's both. If it wasn't for religious reasons you would... No, because I think there is... I think kosher laws are based off of humane. Okay. Killing. Like the whole point of kosher slaughter is to kill an animal in the...  Yeah, it's similar to hello slaughter in a way. Kosher slaughter in a very similar sharp knife. I've seen that. Have you witnessed that? I've seen videos. Of cows being killed kosher? Yep. What did you think? I thought that it's better than the alternative of factory farming. Well, factory farms are not slaughterhouses. Slaughterhouse is factory farms. Any animal cruelty as you said. Yeah, yeah. So basically we're getting off the topic here. We've gone to slaughter, right? But we were debating intelligence for a second there. So do you think... Obviously like we can debate a practical point on how intelligent a cow is. I think you're going to have to look into that yourself because I think we're just going to go back and forth. Right. Because you'll say they're not smart. I'll say they are.  Because you don't have a metric.  They're probably dumber. It's okay to kill them. Well, there's less conclusive evidence that cows mourn. And there's a lot of conclusive evidence that dogs mourn. There's no conclusive evidence... No, no, no. I did not say no conclusive evidence. I said less. There is some evidence. Animal neurology is a very, very hard topic. It's because we can't talk with animals in plain English. It is a very tricky topic. So cows are maternal animals, yeah? Maternal. Maternal. They have a nine month pregnancy like humans do. I believe so. And you don't think that they feel anything when you take their calf from them? I think that's more of a motherly thing than a lost thing. Because when most animals, from the hyperintelligent to the like, the fish... I'm sorry, that was the... Fish are not smart. The fish are f***ing dumb. I'm sorry. Fish are very unintelligent animals. You're getting into... I would say that there's a lot you don't know about fish. What don't I know about fish? They actually beat... What type of animal? Chimpanzees. Chimpanzees and their scientist four-year-old daughter in the colored plate experiment. It's called the colored plate experiment. The animals think whatever primates they were, they had to learn to eat off of one colored plate first and both colored plates would stay. So if they ate off the red plate, both plates would stay. If they ate off the blue plate, they would lose a plate of food. All right? I think it was like a hundred tries for the fish. They beat the primates and they beat the four-year-old... the scientist's four-year-old daughter at this colored plate experiment. Well... An octopus.  Well, the octopus and fish are completely separate animals. You mean like the fish that swim, the vertebrate? Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. Well, in terms of the color plate argument, I'm assuming you're being truthful. I don't think you'd lie. I haven't read this study, but based off of what you are saying here, I don't know how conclusive that might be.  Well, I think I will have to educate myself on that a bit more, but either, either, either. My argument is not contingent on this intelligence thing. I think it's a very bad argument. I don't think someone's rights should be contingent on how smart they are. I think it should be on your capacity to experience the world and to suffer and to basically experience. That's what gives you rights. Because if you're smarter than me, you sound pretty smart, you shouldn't have better rights than me. Well, should you? That's an interesting argument. I think it might be slightly tiptoeing into a strawman argument, but I do think it's a very interesting thought experiment. There's a bell curve of intelligence between us. Some are smart, some are not. That is true. Some are born with a disability. Children, they grow to be smarter, but as a baby, they're no less smart than a baby chick. Like a baby chicken. Baby chickens are smarter in some ways than a six-month-old human. One metric. And they can recognize their sibling upon hatching, and also they know when something has disappeared. Object permanence. Object permanence. That babies think that scorn and they pick a boo sort of stuff. Pick a boo, yeah. Well, without further information, I can't really draw any conclusive...  I am a very evidence-based person. But my principal point doesn't need any of this research. And what do you think about the principal point? The principal point of the fact that... Intelligence shouldn't dictate the way someone is treated. I certainly think that with everything, there is nuance.  I understand where lines tend to get gray, but you were debating with me about a cow. Cow is very far away from certain insects. And they're a lot closer to us. I can say that cows are definitely on the line. On your line? On my line. So your line is like just above cows? Certainly, and I mean... I mean, God. If... So I mean, but I think that line's a much more strict standard than what most people have. Don't you rectify the argument from marginal cases then? Because... Marginal like cows. They're a marginal case human beings. Right, oh. Who have a capacity less than a cow. And they do exist. If you don't believe they do definitely exist, but if you don't believe they do, create the hypothetical human, put them just below a cow in your metric, is it okay to kill that human? From a Georgian standpoint. For a burger. For a burger. The same reason we kill cows. That's pretty funny. Kosher. Certainly. Kosher slaughter too. Well, I'm just going to say painless slaughter. First I want to approach it without the burger. Well, that's the only reason we kill cows. Generally? Well, there's medical research as well. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think... Small percentage. I think it is... I think it is okay to put them down. That happens a lot in the medical field. Doc Sigmund Freud was put down. Oh, you mean... You mean euthanizing... Yeah, Kvorkian. I don't know if Kvorkian is... It's like a... Mercy killing. Yes. We're not talking about mercy killing, man. We're talking about killing them against their will for a needless product. Well, if they're at the point where they're cow level... I support killing mercy killing. That is mercy killing. If they're at that low of a level, if they can't function, if they're just, like, in misery, in a wheelchair... No, no, no, no, no, no. I'm not talking about suffering. I'm talking about mental capacity. I never said that we're wanting to kill them because they're suffering in this state. They're just... I'm trying to create this hypothetical being that is human, that has less complexity of thought than a cow because that was your metric. Right. Just to see if you're consistent. And I'm not talking about mercy killing or euthanasia because they're in pain. I'm just talking about they're just existing in pretty good well-being.   Is that justified in your opinion? Well, there... I know that in the medical field there have been mercy killings of such individuals. And if they are happy... Like, the mercy killings I'm referring to have been like people who kind of just are in wheelchairs slobbering all over themselves, not being able to kind of process. I'm like... Cows are not like that. I know that's what I'm saying. They're better than the other cow. So they can feel happiness. Of course cows can feel happiness, suffering. Cows can feel a whole range of emotions if they care for their young. You see them dancing out in the grass when they get used to the barns, you know? Well, in that case, I'm going to have to say no. That wouldn't be okay. I'd have to say no. Okay, okay. So it's not okay for the... That's a good argument, by the way. Because you're a logical man. I wanted to bring it down to logic because you have a contradiction there. No, that's a very good argument. That's a very indulgent argument. I'm actually surprised. Sorry, that sounded insulting. I wasn't trying to insult you. Don't take my rights away and eat me. That was a bomb. That was certainly a bomb. Well, I don't know. You might bomb this approach on it too. But from a food chain perspective, it's the way of life. Humans have eaten cows. We are omnivorous creatures. So you said humans have eaten cows. Are you going to appeal to history or tradition? No, not tradition. Well, nature. Are you going to appeal to nature? I'm appealing to nature. I want to see how you approach this.  I care what's ethical and what we ought to do in civilization as it is now. I don't look to nature to dictate my morality, to dictate my health care. I don't look to nature and go, hey, you know what? There's no medicine in nature. I'm not going to have medicine. Hey, I looked at lions mating with lioness without consent. It doesn't matter to me what happens in nature. What we've done historically or traditionally, these are all just logical fallacies. That's a pretty good argument. It wouldn't matter if we were omnivores either. It wouldn't matter if you believe we were natural omnivores. But we are. If you believe that, that's... I don't believe that. That's fact. Would I call us omnivores? Would I call us opportunistic scavengers? Because we're not built like an omnivore and with teeth we don't hunt down our prey. We don't have omnivorous instincts either. Vultures are still carnivorous and they are scavengers, yeah. They are mostly scavengers, yeah. But they're carnivorous. They eat rotten flesh. We don't behave like omnivores is what I mean.  We sanitize it so there's no bacteria. We don't act like natural omnivores. So we're closer to like fake omnivores, wannabe omnivores. Scavengers. Scavengers, necrovore, maybe. But scavengers and necrovores.  It's already dead. In nature. And primates do other primates. Our closest relatives. And to me, whatever you believe we are or whatever scientifically we are, it doesn't matter. What matters is what is ethical to do. Right. What to do. And I don't think it's obviously not bad for our health to not eat meat.  I mean, I'd say that eating meat probably might. I'm going to do a little bit. I'm sorry. This is a logical fallacy. I'm going to do a bit of a appeal to authority. My father is one of the top gastroenterologists nutritionists in the country. And it's a very interesting argument. And not this country, America.  Right. Do you think it's required for us to be of general well-being health-wise to eat animals? Well, it is, as you're saying, with modern technology. Meat is halal, being vegan is just a mental thing. It's already halal, being vegan is halal. Animals are upon this earth to be... Fred, we can't eat certain animals because of certain things, but animals are there to be... Vegan is halal as well. Being vegan is halal as well. Yes, because in Islam, you can have a half vegan lifestyle and also eat meat or not every day of the week. As a human body, as a human, your body is able to consume these things.   Have a good day. Have a good day, my brother. Take care. Bless you. Wow, I can't finish my logical fallacy. Being vegan is also halal because you don't drink alcohol. But anyways... Yeah, you're dead. It's not like people, obviously, can live as vegan.  But it is, from a health perspective, ideal to eat meat. And I mean, with modern technology... What do you mean ideal? With modern technology, we can get nutrients that are in meat that we need such as... I can't just use an example, but not as bioavailable. For instance, Coenzyme Q10, it's very necessary in our body's anti-oxidation cycles. I've never heard of that, by the way. Coenzyme Q10. With the Academy of Nutrition Dietetics in America, the largest group of nutrition professionals on earth, doctors and nutritionists, I think it's about 50,000. Would they know about it? Coenzyme Q10, yes. So why haven't they... Why have they brought out a big peer-reviewed position statement saying that vegan diets are only healthy for all stages of the life cycle? Why have they done that? Impancy, pregnancy, adulthood, elderly, athletes? Because, again, with modern advances in technology, we can get stuff that is only, like, nutrients that we usually get from meat in nature. But, again, it's not as bioavailable, so it's harder to maintain a vegan diet. They didn't mention this enzyme in the position statement. Coenzyme Q10, it's a very, very, very... Like, my father uses it to treat patients all the time. It's a very, very, very critical of... And he, my, earned, for instance... They made a mistake then in their position paper. It is feasible, and it's harder to maintain a vegan diet, but it is feasible to do so. I'm not saying that you're going to die if you aren't vegan.  If you found out you could be healthy as a vegan, do you think it would be the thing we ought to do morally? Well, to be fair, I think in 10 years we won't have to have this conversation. In lab-grown meat, advances in lab-grown meat, it's becoming more feasible to have commercial lab-grown meat.  But, you know, it's going to be a moot point in 10 years. I appreciate what you say, but I didn't appreciate an answer to. Right, okay, so ask me the question again, I'm sorry. Should we be vegan from a moral perspective if you found out that you could be healthy? Sir, I would change your mind. Is it the thing we ought to do morally? Again, I think it really depends on the animal and how you kill them. Because, obviously, factory farms in slaughterhouses don't do it in the most humane way. They do it in a very cruel and unusual way, I'd say. Local farmers, kosher slaughter, rabbis that do the kosher slaughter, they do it in a pretty humane, painless way. I've witnessed kosher slaughter. Right. One of the most sickening types of slaughter I've seen, actually. Really? I've witnessed, yeah. Well, from a medical perspective, it is from the animal's perspective. You know, the RSPCA here in the UK, who I don't actually agree with as an organization, in general. What is that? The RSPCA, the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. I think I've heard of them. Yeah. Well, they actually don't allow non-stun halal slaughter, because it takes a minute for the animal to die. It's a minute of suffering. They're not equivalent, though. They're almost identical. No, that's actually a very common misconception. So what is different about kosher? I don't know enough about halal slaughter to be honest, to give you the deeds. Halal is a super sharp knife, and they cut really quickly through a bunch of nerves, and they expect that the animal will stop receiving a message to the brain. But that's actually not the case. So it's basically just slashing a lamb or a cow's throat open without any stunning. They just slashed them with a sharp knife, I think, across the throat. Either way, I still think painlessly taking someone's life from them is not right. And I think you agreed when we try to equalize the human to a cow. Obviously, cow... There is a lot to debate on cow terms, but I'm assuming you also don't eat fish, and the color plate, I can't really say anything about that chick thing you brought up earlier. The color plate argument, that means nothing to me in terms of intelligence, because color perception and intelligence are not inherently correlated. Well, I don't care about intelligence when it comes to moral discussions, and we already tackled that. It's kind of beside my point. That is beside your point. Fish is still sentient and feels pain and suffering. In ten years this will be a moot point. Why does it matter now? I want to get your opinion on that. I don't want to wait ten years. You don't want to wait ten years. I think right now, we have the power. The only reason lab-grown meat is when people are taking action and going, okay, we've got to make meat obsolete. There's people out there advocating there's different forms of activism all helping culture change, and I want to be one of those people that I didn't wait for. I want to be on the right side of history and not go, oh wait, I waited for culture to change before I acted morally. What was I doing back then? There's a reason you don't go around kicking dogs and stomping on and I don't want to act anymore. I wouldn't want it done to me. You have your own moral system. I suggest you contradict it. I don't think I just contradict it. I think that again, I think we both laid out that there is certainly a double standard in society. But I think it's a much more nuanced topic. It's a very nuanced topic. There's obviously an interesting line drawing aspect. There's the health aspect. Certain point where the lion becomes grey. Yes. And it definitely ain't our cows. It definitely ain't our cows. Well in terms of factory farming, yes.  Even if we killed them painlessly. For a burger, that was for sure. He said for mercy killing, it's okay. I think from a very weird ethical standpoint I personally would never eat a human burger. But it's like organ donors.  I don't have a problem with roadkill. People eating roadkill. The only problem I would see is that they would start to eat a product and it would slow it very slow. But generally, if there's a dead bird there and someone wants to eat it, I don't protest it. If they kill the bird against the bird's wheel and then eat the bird then I have a problem with it because there's other things to eat. Unless they're in a survival situation you're not. So then would you also agree that if a human's already dead like roadkill for instance I personally wouldn't eat a dead animal or a dead human. I don't see animals as food or humans as food. If I see a dead pigeon I would put them in the ground. I'd feel very sad about it. If I see a dead human I would respect their body. I don't see dead animals or dead people like that. I don't look at it like that anymore. I changed the way I completely view animals. There's no chicken as food anymore.  An omnivore would start licking their blood and start chewing into the... I don't know. It depends on how rotten it is.  When you boil it down to the gritty it's gross but that's just how it is. That's how nature is. That is an appeal to nature. I don't care about nature. I know you do not. There's good things in nature and disgusting things in nature which is why you can't point to it and say this is ethical because of nature or this is healthy because of nature My point was that a human probably millennia ago if they saw not moldy chicken on the ground they probably would have licked their lips but we have society now surviving doing what they can they probably eat each other back here and there probably I definitely see your point about society evolving I think it's certainly a very solid point It's certainly a good intellectual topic to chew on but in the 10 years that it's going to take that's just an estimate obviously a number I'm throwing out of my ass but in the 10 years it's going to take to get lab grown meat for health reasons mostly for health reasons obviously there's the greedy reason of it taste good which would be a bit dumb for me to argue People do, you'd be surprised that's one of the number one things I get they taste good this is just some practical help you probably have the utilities to be able to look this up but if you're interested I don't think it's justified to do what we do I will certainly read some of your thought ideas I will think about them critically I always like listening to different paradigms you have a security detail behind you do you want to debate him it was great talking with you you really made me think today I never in America, I live in Seattle I never get intellectual conversation never never never it's impossible to find it I'm getting up if you want to talk with him yeah I guess I won't hug it was a pleasure to talk with you I won't hug you anymore I'll let someone else have that joy


Welcome to this video on reading content in English. As an EMI instructor, you will want to be aware of the needs your students have regarding reading and understanding content in English. In order to make meaning from a text, students need to know most of the words, understand the grammar structures, and have at least some background knowledge about the topic. This video will discuss needs assessment for students' reading skills and the five subskills involved in reading. Doing at least a brief needs assessment regarding students' reading proficiency is helpful. One way is to ask students to write a brief summary in their own words of an assigned text, either in or out of class, and in their native language or in English. Be sure you choose a text that is similar to readings you have for your class in topic, vocabulary, complexity, and grammatical complexity. Having students write a summary will give you an idea of the vocabulary they know, and also if they are able to understand the main idea of the text. Another option is to give students a brief, ungraded quiz. Questions need to be written carefully, though, so that you focus on main ideas and not unnecessary details. And you'll have to decide if students can look at the reading when they answer the quiz or not. A third option is to have students read a text for homework and discuss it in small groups in class, asking each student to share at least three or four points. The benefit here is that students can communicate about main ideas, but at the same time it might be unrealistic for the EMI instructor to hear all students in this format. All the same, these are some options in getting information about how well your students read and understand text in English. And remember that students reading comprehension in English may be stronger or weaker than their skills in listening or speaking in English. So what is reading anyway? Reading is a word that actually refers to several sub-skills. The main ones include these five. One, reading in detail. This refers to a reader being able to figure out the main idea of a text and also any relevant details. The reader also needs to understand how the main idea and details work together to build meaning. For example, the reader needs to be able to identify how many main ideas a text has and how many details or examples the writer included. EMI students need to be able to read in detail and still focus on the main ideas so they don't try to remember every small thing. They should remember the big main points and a few examples or details of those points. EMI students will need their instructor's help with this. Two, scanning. Scanning refers to being able to look quickly over a text and find specific information. For example, when you go to a restaurant and look for certain foods like desserts or a fish dish, that's scanning. You don't read every word.  With EMI courses, students will need to be able to quickly scan texts in order to find what they are looking for, such as key terms and examples of those terms or answers to comprehension or discussion questions. Students will likely need at least some in-class training with scanning so that they don't just read all the words too carefully and forget what they're looking for. Third, skimming. Skimming refers to being able to look quickly over a text and get the main idea of the text. It's different from scanning because with scanning, you are looking for specific information and you probably slow down and read carefully when you find the section you're looking for. With skimming, you are looking for main ideas. EMI students will benefit from skimming a text before they start to read it in detail more carefully. This will allow them to create an overall outline in their minds of what the text is about. They might also look for key vocabulary terms while skimming that they think they should review before reading the text in detail. Next, identifying opinions. Identifying opinions refers to readers being able to figure out if a sentence or section is a fact or if it's someone's opinion. This is important in content learning since if a student gets confused, they might think something is factual when it isn't. Facts are things that can be proven to be correct and opinions are things that people believe to be true or not true cannot be proven. Common words that represent opinions are think, believe, seem, good, better, worst, or should be.


YouTube team keep it clean. What's going on? It's engraving here with another video And this is actually an episode of NFL questions from subscribers But for this episode we're gonna do it a little bit differently now Of course what you know as questions from subscribers is a series where you can ask me any NFL question You want to based off of any NFL team and we answer it in a video Just like this or if we do a question from subscribers live stream, which we have a lot of fun And we answer in a video just like that But in today's episode We're going to be focusing on one in particular question that a lot of people have been thinking about And of course when we talk about the wide receiver position, we can go on and on for days about it But this is something that we haven't really spoken of too much on here recently Even with all the new additions. So the question it came from my guide to real be Before we get into this, I got to give a huge shout out to to real be shout out to him both him and his dad And the reason why I want to give them a shout out is because they have been supporting for years They've been rocking with us for years And and trust me I do notice it They don't comment in the comment section too often But over time they've been sending emails for questions from subscribers And one of the things with them is that it's been hard because it's been like man they will send these really good questions, but they will send them to the wrong email and I'll be like man, it's just so good and sometimes I would even let it slide But it took me a while and I had to muster up some courage and be like, oh I gotta stick to my guns. You got to send it to the right email. So they did that cuz I know he's in questions his dad is in questions and Something that's really really that I really appreciate about that is that they say they watch the videos together and it just It seems as if from the messages that they have a really good relationship And I think that is extremely extremely important that Somebody's dad is there for them Because in today this day and age and I know everybody's situation is different But I think it's extremely important and it's a beautiful thing that a father and son have a relationship. So Bacon's I love y'all. I really appreciate y'all and I appreciate you all's relationship, too So alright, let's get into this question. So he said what's going on in Graven? Hope all as well as usual with you and the fan Everything is really good. Everything is really really really good. So I appreciate it. He said I have a question Do you think that they the Ravens want to see what they can develop since that's what everyone says they can't do and A that has been a very very big topic and when it comes to the Ravens community When it comes to the wide receiver position, it's been the lack of development the lack of development And I've explained a lot of times why I feel there has been such a lack of development when it comes to the Ravens And it's a gift and a curse all at the same time One of the biggest reasons that I believe that the Ravens have such a lack of development when it comes to the wide receiver position It's because the Ravens are continuously the Ravens are always the Ravens are annually in when now mold And since they're in when now mold, they don't want to sit back and be like, oh, you know what? Let's let's develop these wide receivers. Let's see what these young boys got. No, they're looking for guys that are ready right here And right now to compete Right now right here to compete for a Super Bowl That's what they're looking for. So they don't want to go through an entire process of oh, yeah, let's develop our own guys They they have those guys but a lot of the guys that they draft are just usually depth guys They may be special teamers they may get in every now and then but since the Ravens are in when now mold They look for the right here right now at wide receiver. Anyway, continuing the question. He said And could they possibly use the draft to pick another first round? Another first rounder with these new wide receiver coaches and believe free agency is not the answer So what he's saying with that is could they use the draft their first round picking? Of course the picks that follow to not even focus on wide receiver Could they use their first round picking go in another direction and not really even worry about wide receiver in the draft Because they got their own guys and like he said They brought these new wide receiver coaches and they believe that free agency just simply isn't the answer Well, that's a big possibility It really is Because you have again Hollywood you got Sammy Watkins now So you got a guy who got some experience, but now with Sammy Watkins again like we stated Sammy Watkins doesn't have the best history when it comes to health So I just I know that the Ravens notice you if we know it then the Ravens got to know it that They cannot just rely on Sammy Watkins and be like, okay. Hey, hey, that's it. We're done Or if they do look at him like that like okay, we're done at wide receiver Then this could lead to what his question is about them actually trying to develop their own They brought in T-mart and they brought in Keith Williams and these guys they've worked with a Sammy Watkins before Tyreek Hill Devontae Adams and there's more to those are the only guys I could think of off the top of my head But it could show that and again Eric the Costa over the past couple of years We've seen it. They've went pretty young at the wide receiver position in a couple years ago, they signed Seth Roberts and That was it Ain't getting out then go out and get anybody crazy anything like that. They got Seth Roberts Then they are then there was Willie Sneed too. He was there. He was young and They kept Willie Sneed Seth Roberts left then last year they had a dad's Bryant They got him in the middle of the season. He didn't really do anything for the Ravens I think well, he didn't do anything much on the field, but He certainly off the field. He helped boost the other receivers around them But it could be this could happen and I think really to answer your question on what the Ravens will do The rest of free agency, but more so the draft will really answer that question How the Ravens draft how they move in the draft, which is less than a month away That'll really answer the question of what the Ravens intend on doing at the wide receiver position Because yeah, they've added Sammy Watkins and you still got the young boys till you got Deon Kane You got Benjamin Victor as well And then of course Hollywood boy can do when they pro-shade you got all those guys So you you got you got a lot of depth But what are you gonna do with that depth? Is it gonna remain that boy are guys gonna get a legitimate shot? Or are you still gonna continue to venture and look around for adding additional wide receiver help? The draft will answer that question and I think really I don't even think you'll have to wait for the entire draft You just watch watch just the first three rounds the first three rounds will definitely answer your question And y'all know how I feel about the Ravens when it comes to them drafting a receiver I do not think if the receiver is drafted after the first round and Maybe after the even the second round or after Then yeah, it may not be much emphasis put into that wide receiver. He may have a shot, but he won't really have a shot So we just got to see how these Ravens move But continuing he said maybe even they might even take a stab at free ad free agency to challenge What we have to prove themselves, you know to put a chip on their shoulders I like that part. He said thanks as always for the content You're my most watched YouTube football broadcaster and just like Sammy Watkins possibly said I'm out. Oh, well, I appreciate it to real So, yeah, I I could see that I could see that Because this would really like really Forced the Ravens and I know you still got Sammy Watkins But if they didn't draft a receiver early if they didn't really dibble and dabble anymore in free agency That would force the Ravens to really use their own guys and really take a different turn as far as the development of their own wide receivers And they got some guys that you know, you know these guys they may try to stay away from it But you know, they hear all of it. You know, they do Hollywood going into his third year. Oh, you're not a number one guy.  Oh, no Ravens need more those those they just guys man They just slot guys Ravens need more than that. They hear it Miles Boykin Everything that gets said about him, you know, he hears it. They hear it and whether they hear it directly through the media They hear through fans and the comments that they hear it from whatever Analysts whatever it might be They hear it So I know you talked about how the Ravens may want to put a chip on their own wide receiver shoulders But I think the chip is already there It's there already Because and you you gots to feel like man these Ravens the wide receivers They probably don't even want the Ravens to sign anybody else They don't want it Because they know especially depending on who it is that would take away and eat away from their Opportunity and these dudes want to prove themselves Who wouldn't but if you're you're NFL play like you listen You don't already made it man You like you're one out of millions man You're one out of millions It's so many people that play football from Little League and they they keep on going up going up They play it in middle school. They play it in high school They go from JV to varsity then they go to college and some people even are standouts in college studs But they don't make it to the NFL. They don't make it But these guys they made it to the NFL So you think like these guys want to be like, oh, you know what we made it to the NFL already Oh, yeah, we're good. Just being depth guys since we're hitting. No Especially at wide receive like what's a wide receivers job catch the football if they see Ravens as somebody else No, we don't want that. We want to catch the football. We want opportunities to catch the football And if the Ravens ask somebody else, that's gonna take away from the opportunity to catch the football So you know these guys already got a chip on their shoulder You know these guys want to go out there and really prove who they are what they can do their reliability all of that stuff They want to show that to the world So the chip is got to be there already if it wasn't there that would be a problem that will be a problem and These guys don't have to come out and publicly say, oh, I got a chip on my shoulder. No, you ain't got to do that You ain't got to do none of that Let your work speak for itself and in practice and training camp and all that That's when that fire has got to be lit Lit it has to be ain't no other way man So I hope these Ravens receive whatever the Ravens do at wide receiver Whether they add more or they don't You know these boys they got to be ready and another thing that goes in their favor Especially for Duvenay and crochet But even boykin in Hollywood and all of them is the off-season off-season last year wasn't much of anything Now not necessarily that that is an excuse Because you see plenty of receivers still produced even in new offenses But I mean Duvenay and pro shade this offense was new for them because they came from college But This year it should be better So it's up to everybody to play that part. We've been saying that all off-season Lamar got to do better the offensive line got to do better Greg Roman got to do better The receivers got to do better everybody has to do better, but I think the Ravens know that and They wanted to the reason why they kept Greg Roman is because they wanted to capitalize on what they do well But they also wanted to improve on what they don't So they kept Greg Roman But then they added these wide receiver coaches who came from the college ranks, but They have NFL experience And I don't know if y'all remember we used to talk about that all the time that the that's what the Ravens need to bring in College guys some college guys and some guys that can relate to the players that we have And that's exactly what they did and I love it. Appreciate you Terrell Shout out to you and your dad much love to your team. Keep it clean. I love y'all Appreciate y'all and we out man


Page 345. I want to talk about using identities to solve equations. Now, I don't think I put one like this on your test. At least I know it's not on the written. There might be one on the multiple choice, but I think I threw one on one of your quizzes, and this does show up on the provincial. So we're going to cover it here. Using identities to solve equations. And it says solve the following equations where 0 is less than or equal to x less than or equal to 2 pi. And the first one you'll notice has cos squared and sine. Now, if this was a multiple choice question, I would glance at the answers and if they were decimals, I would say, hi graph and calculator. But they've given me between 0 and 2 pi and I think they're suggesting I can solve this algebraically. But I've never given you something with two trig functions in it. What the heck can I do here? I can target that cos squared. See it? How can I write cos squared as a sine? And your hint is, look at the top row of your formula sheet. What is cos squared if I want it as a sine function? Kyle. Okay, if you said 1 minus sine, 1 minus sine squared. What I can actually do to solve this is rewrite the 2, but instead of a cos squared, put a 1 minus sine squared and then minus 3 sine x equals 0. What do you think we would do now using your, because you've got some good equation solving skills, what would you do now? Can you get rid of brackets?  What kind of an equation is this? It's a quadratic. How do I know? It's got a squared. I don't like this because the quadratic term, the squared term is negative. We've never really taught you to deal with squared terms that are negative. Do you know why? How can you make it positive Troy? Just throw everything the other side.  It's going to be plus, plus, minus. We're going to run out of room here if we're not careful, but that's okay. Now this is a lovely quadratic, just like the quiz that you wrote recently. It's going to factor because there's no GCF. I checked for that already. You know what? I'm almost positive there's going to be a 2 sine x and a sine x. Again, if you don't know how to factor these, I'm around after school. I will happily teach you, but I need to find out what method you were taught first and then I can reinforce that method. There are so many teachers teaching different methods. I generally don't give one in class in grade 12. For a negative 2 there, I think I want to go plus 2, minus 1. Does that give me my 3? Yeah, it does. Wish I knew how my brain did that? No idea. What are the roots of this second bracket? Sine x equals negative 2. Why can I do that? Oh, yeah, lowest sine gets as negative 1. Oh, thank you. They gave me one factor with no roots.  What are the roots of this first bracket? Sine x equals 1 half. Have I got a triangle with a 1 and a 2 in it? Yeah. Cast rule. I'm running out of room here, but we'll see if I can fit this all in. C A S T. Sine is positive here and here. Which triangle is this? Oh, this is the 1, 2, root 3 triangle. Thank you. Glad you made it. They talked to me ahead of time, so no dice for them. Hey, which angle has a sine of 1 half? The bottom one or the top one? 5 by 6. In fact, I'm pretty sure I'll get x1 equals pi by 6 and x2 equals 5 pi by 6. That's a 5 if you can't read my writing. So there's an example of where you can use a trig identity. How would you know that you were supposed to use a trig identity? Well, if it was multiple choice, you would glance at, first of all, you'd see there was more than one trig function. And you would glance at your answers. It was multiple choice and they wouldn't be decimals. Although I'll be honest, if it was on the calculator section, I'd probably still just choose to graph left side, graph right side, find where they cross and change my answers to decimals. I think it'd still be faster. But doable. Oh, and if it was on the written section, I guess you'd have more than one trig function. It was on the written section.  On the provincial, I don't think I've seen one on the written. I have seen it every couple of years on the multiple choice. Let's try b. Sine x minus root 3 cos x equals 0. Hmm. Suggestions? Crashing calculator? No, I'm going to try and do this algebraically here. First of all, is this a quadratic? No, it's not. I'm not going to be so attached to making this equal to 0. In fact, I might, because there's only two terms, I might say, why don't I write this like sine x equals root 3 cos x? Why don't I try fussing that over? Looks nicer. Anybody see it? I'll pause. You need to go tan equals root 3. Where'd you get that? Oh, divide by cos. Divide by cos. What happens to the coses over here? Can they cancel? It is factored. And Troy, what is sine over cosine? In fact, you get tan x equals root 3, and I'll make it obvious I'll put the root 3 over 1, because it is the 1, 2, root 3 triangle. There was a tangent hidden in there. That's kind of a clever trick. That one does show up just once in a while. The odd time. But did you hear how I recognized it? I said it's equal to 0, but it's not a quadratic. Is that why you're always, what kind of an equation is this? It's not a quadratic. So I said, I don't need to be so attached to keeping it equal to 0. We can solve this. Do I have a triangle? Oh, first of all, Castro. C A S T. Tangent is positive here and here. Do I have a triangle with the root 3 and the 1 in it? Yeah. Which angle, the bottom one or the top one, has a tangent of root 3 over 1? Opposite over adjacent. Pi by 3. Pi by 3. And I get x1 equals pi by 3, and x2 equals 4 pi by 3. Ta-da. So I'm going to add a couple of questions for you to practice. Let me try 7. Number 7. Now I've got a choice. If you want to, I can do a few more identity examples from that big hints for trig identity sheet. By the way, that hints for trig identity sheet, that's not homework. I just always fold a copy of their side because it's very hard for me to make these up in my head. That way I got a bunch of extra practice identities I can do with you if you want me to. Or I can give you the rest of the class. You want me to do a couple more examples or you want to just take, I see people nodding. Okay, give me one second, then I'm going to pause. So I just gave you your take-home quiz, and give me a second. I need to go find hints for proving trig identities. Bring that puppy up. And let's try, what, 22? Okay, sure, let's try 22.  All right, suggestions. Okay, I think I would do that. By the way, starting with the most complex side, although is the right-hand side already in terms of sine and cos? I probably am going to come back to that later, I suspect. Let's see. So you're saying right the left side in terms of sine and cos because there is more than two trig functions. So tan is going to be sine n over cos, not s, Mr. Dewick. Good gosh. That n is throwing me off. I'm so used to Greek letters. All over sine n over cos n. Did it again. Plus sine n, Mr. Dewick is my math teacher. He says don't you dare not write that as a fraction. If we have one fraction, we want all fractions. How many levels does this fraction have? Now, if it was just one fraction over one fraction, it would be, how do I divide by fraction? It's not going to work here because I got one fraction over two fractions. This is a complex fraction. I'm going to show you that same trick. It's a great trick. If you master it, if you learn it, it'll almost always save you two or three lines. What's the trick? Look at each mini fraction. What's my common denominator? Cos. I'm going to go like this. Add a bracket. Add a bracket. I'm going to multiply by cos over cos. You can put it here, here, or you can put it here, here. I don't care. I usually have more room on the right side, so I'm going to go cos n over cos n. But to help me keep it all organized, Stacey, over one, over one. By the way, what am I really multiplying by when I multiply by cos over cos? The whole key here is if you ever multiply by something, it has to be a one because you want to keep these two things equal. If you multiply by something other than a one, now this will no longer be equal to that. You can't prove it. You'll end up doing 15 lines of nonsense. Here, you see it? Cos cancels. And you get all over. Here, you see it? Cos cancels. And you get sin n plus. Here, by the way, I encourage you, draw the little loops I learned a long time ago by putting that little chunk, chunk, chunk thing. It gets rid of a lot of my dumbest tricks, keeps me systematic. Here, is anything going to cancel? Nope, sin cos. Victoria, can I cancel? Have I factored? Don't you dare! And again, why am I so big on avoiding it? Cos as soon as you do that, now the rest of your work is wrong. You can't make it look like the right side. You can't do it. One of the reasons these are tough is as soon as you make an algebra mistake, you're out of luck. Suggestions now. Where, factor, where? Oh, the bottom? Really? By the way, what is the GCF in the bottom? What do I have on the bottom here? That's a little bread crumb, I think, telling me I'm on the right track. I think, I think, I think, I think, I think, maybe? So I would go like this. It's going to be sin n all over sin n bracket 1 plus cos n. Victoria, can I cancel? Have I factored? Then I can. Oh, but what would be left on top? Yeah, let's do that. I don't want to leave it totally blank. That would be silly and confusing. So here's what I have. 1 plus 1 over cos equals 1 minus cos over sin squared. Now what? Now you've got two options. I've heard Troy here say sin squared equals 1 minus cos squared. And that would work. And I'll show you how you could do it that way in just a second. Here is where I would say conjugate. Because on the left-hand side, do I have a binomial denominator? Yes. With no squares. Yes. This is the conjugate. This is where I think I would say, by the way, what is the conjugate of this Troy? What's on the top over here? That's also how I knew to do the conjugate.  The breadcrumbs along the way.  And on the top, woohoo, I get 1 minus cos n, which means that bottom must work out to sin squared when all is said and done. Let's see. When I multiply this out, I'll get 1.  What's a minus cos plus cos? Nothing.  What is 1 minus cos, oh, can I cancel? By factor? No. What is 1 minus cos squared?  Now Troy had an interesting approach. So once you've written that, put your pencils down and look at what I had written in the blue here. Sorry, actually look at what I had, sure, written in the blue here where we had 1 all over 1 plus cos. Troy, here's another approach you could have done. What did you say sin squared was?  Now the reason I don't really like this approach is because kids are so tempted to cancel.  Especially because if you cancel a 1 minus cos on a 1, by the way, can I cancel? Have I? Okay, you can't. But if you cancel that and that, what would you get on top if you canceled out a 1 minus cos? A 1. And what's on the top over here? What, like, kids are really, really tempted to do that. However, this factors. How many terms are there in the bottom? 2 minus sin is the first term of perfect square? Is the second term of perfect square? This is actually different to squares. This is actually 1 minus cos n all over 1 minus cos, 1 plus cos. Can I cancel? Have I factored? Then I could argue that those two brackets are the same. There's a 1 left behind, and lo and behold, I do have 1 plus 1 over cos. Sorry, 1 over 1 plus cos. Either of those approaches is totally valid. We're at the stage now where for a lot of these alex, we've got two or three ways to get there. In fact, I can think of at least one other way that we could have got there too, but I won't go into it. The key, Justine, is don't make algebra mistakes. Don't cancel when you cancel. Victoria, can I cancel? Have I? Those have to go together. Don't ever, when you're doing fractions, don't ever multiply by something that's not a 1. That's why I yelled at you so much two days ago for those of you when you're finding a common denominator who just have the habit of multiplying the top only. If you start that habit, you won't catch when you're doing it illegally. Trust me, always top and bottom, always. That was so much fun. Let's do another one. One more. All right, hit me with your best shot. What do you want to try? 29. Actually, 29 is from the old curriculum. So I'll talk about 29. I won't do it. Look at the top on the left. How many terms on the top on the left? Two. Minus sine? No. However, that does factor. Plus sine? Say yes. Perfect cube? Perfect cube? Say yes. We used to teach a factoring rule. It was called sum of cubes in the old curriculum. And you would factor that. And guess what one of your factors would be?  The bottom there would end up being one of the factors and a bunch of stuff would cancel. Okay. Kind of nerdily cool. So I'd love to do 29, but it's a bit beyond our curriculum. So which one? Sorry? 24? Oh, sure. That looks doable. Probably this is over the top in terms of what you'll see on the provincial. I don't know what you're going to see on your test or what you'll see on the provincial. The big review trig package that I gave you, which is an assignment and which you can do everything except for anything with a two theta in it. That's a great idea of the level of difficulty. So 24. Ooh, I haven't done this one before. I don't think that a while since I've done a brand new trig identity, I am getting my nerdy adrenaline rush. Well, the good news is I'm pretty sure the right side's done. Right? Oh, and this is where some of you may be so tempted. Why can't I plus one over? Because that would be assuming they're equal in order to prove they're equal. And that's really what makes identities tough is we can't use our equation solving rules, which are glorious normally. I mean, normally if I was solving as I'm plus one over and all sorts of stuff. Anyways, I'm pretty sure we're leaving the right as is. Suggestions. Ian is correct in that we are going to write everything in terms of sign and coast, but I'm going to give you some advice. Do you think we're going to eventually also have to get rid of brackets? I'm going to suggest we do it now without fractions because you guys are become your mediocre and you're becoming tolerable. But I know you make more dumb mistakes when there are fractions than when there are not. So I'm actually going to get rid of brackets first. Then I'll rewrite everything in terms of sign and coast and bring in the fraction because I'm a good test writer. Always trying to think, how can I minimize my sloppy mistakes?  When we go through the tests, all of you are like, holy smokes. Can't believe my math A is coming back to you to haunt me. But it is. So I'm going to go boom, boom. C can't squared. Whatever the heck that thing is looks sort of like a V. I should know what that is. I can't remember now though. Plus C can't squared. Coast C can't. And then it's going to be minus tan C can't and minus tan squared. All over. Coast C can't. You guys asked for this, didn't you? Plus coast C can't sign. By the way, you just got a half mark. If I did give you one this nasty, nice thing about trig identities is, as long as you can do the basic substitutions, basically impossible to get zero. Anything cancel? I was kind of hoping I'd end up like it with a plus C can't squared and a minus C can't squared. But I don't, I didn't. Sorry, what do I forget to what? Oh, and the minus one. Sheesh. Except I'm going to do that because it's going to be a fraction. I'm sure it'll somewhere along the way. Well, actually, I guess what this is saying is that this whole thing should work out to what? One, because you're supposed to get one minus one is zero. Okay. So I may not need to combine fractions. I may just be able to make this work out to one. I notice I have a C can't squared and a tan squared. Are those related? Can someone look along the top row? Are they in the same identity or not? They are. Okay. What's C can't squared the same as? Sorry. Ooh. I'm going to do that for starters. I'm going to go one change colors, Mr. Dukes, so it stands out a little easier so they can read it better. One plus tan squared plus C can't squared. C can't minus tan C can't minus tan squared minus one over cosecant plus cosecant sine. And something good happens. I got a plus tan squared and a minus tan squared. So now I have one plus C can't squared cosecant minus tan C can't. What was that? Are you being witty and funny? If it was nerdy, I'll like it. Okay. Now what? I think now we'll try writing everything in terms of sign and code. Do you see why I said there's kind of an art to this, even though I called that hint too? I think we saved ourselves some yuckiness by saving that off. Well, I can factor it out of that and that, but there's a one there. I was looking at that actually. I was going, this is where I start to do some algebra in my head. If I pull a C can't out here, I'd have a C can't cosecant minus tan, what, this and this? With the other bracket. Well, I'm going to keep it around. Okay. Here's Ty's suggestion. Don't write this down because I don't think it's going to get us somewhere. This is what I'd be either doing in my head or a scrap piece of paper or whatever. I'm okay because I thought that too.  That's what I would have on the top. Or I could just put what? One over C can't X. If I factor out a C can't X from one, aren't you clever? You're saying that this is C can't over C can't. I think that's more complicated than I want to get to right now. I think if we write everything in terms of sign and cosecant because I see lots of fractions, I'm hoping some stuff will cancel. Let's try that first. I'm going to go like this. One plus C can't squared is one over cosecant squared. Cosecant is one over sign. Since I just wrote a fraction, I'm going to make that first one a fraction just to see what's going on here. Minus tangent is sign over cosecant, and secant is one over cosecant. All over. I'm just going to write some ditto marks right now. We're going to leave that for a while. I would never do that on the test, but in my homework. Sure. This is going to look like when I tidy this up, one over one plus one over sine X cosecant squared X minus sine X over cosecant squared X minus one all over blah, blah. Well, I could write that as one single solitary fraction. What would my common denominator be? Sine X cosecant squared. Now let's pause and let's try and think this through. To turn this into a sine X cosecant squared, what would I multiply the bottom by here? What would I get on top then? A sine squared is kind of nice. It's on the top of my sheet somewhere. This would be a one. In fact, I'd have a one minus sine squared, which is a cose square. I think we're going to try that. I saw some nice stuff potentially happening. Let's try writing the top as one single solitary fraction. We're going to write the top as a fraction all over sine X cosecant squared X. What would I multiply a one by to change it into a sine X cosecant squared?  Don't cancel because we're still doing some math. Then there was a plus sign, so the plus sign would drop down. What would I multiply a sine X cosecant squared X by to get a sine X cosecant squared X? It's going to stay as is. The one's just going to drop down. Minus sine would drop down. What would I multiply a cosecant squared by to get a sine X cosecant squared X?  Cose squared and then I'd have a GCF on the top of. Cose squared and I have a cosecant. Ooh, good stuff happening here. I better rewrite the bottom and the minus one. And I better draw the line. Isn't this fun? You know what we need. Yeah, let's put on the rocky theme in the background. That'll help us, I think. That'll set the tone. Little pump us up, get our brain going music because this is, yeah, this is in the big leagues here. That's assuming my iTunes decides to open up anytime soon. I think I have them under my test music, don't I? No, I don't. Good gosh. Oh, yes, I do. No, I don't. Team Rocky. There we go. Here we go. All right, that's better. Let's keep going. So we got sine X, cose squared X plus cose squared X. That's this guy right here. All over sine X, cose squared X. All over that thing, that thing. Minus one, a little too loud. What do I have on the top here? GCF, all right. Doing math now. No, okay, fine. Victoria, can I cancel? I can. All over that mess. So here's what I end up with on the top. Sine X plus one over sine X. And remember we said our goal, our thought was this great big thing will work out to just plain old one. So what I'm hoping is the bottom works out to sine X plus one over sine X, because then I'd have something over itself. Let's rewrite the bottom finally, which was cose can't plus cose can't sign. Okay, now it's annoying. Cose can't is what over what? One over sine? Did you get a sign on the bottom? And will that give me a sign on the bottom? I think we're on the right track. In fact, I'm willing to bet in two lines this is going to turn into sine X plus one over sine X. And we're done. Feeling a pride. Let's see, let's see, let's see. You guys asked for this one. I've never done this one before.  Oh, what is one over sine times sine over one? Okay. So much fun. Can you see where we're going now? Oh, don't forget the minus one. There's a line dropping down over here. Oh, and equals zero. Miguel, common denominator. I would write this as one fraction. What would my common denominator be? What would I multiply this by? And I'd get one plus sine over sine. On the top, I have one plus sine over sine. We are basically done. Holy smokes. Let's see, we would go time sine X, sine X. And we get this.  What's anything divided by itself? So I would go like this for the marker. And then I would go one minus one with zero question really easily done. Well, no, that really isn't a proper abbreviation. I don't know. Did I answer that already? Did I answer that already?  That was excellent. That was the same rush I used to get playing frozen tag when I was like six years old with my friends. It was like, oh, I unfroze somebody? Yay! Now I'm their hero. Hey, I just got a trig identity. Now I'm their hero. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven, twelve, thirteen. Only thirteen. In answer to your question, Dylan, I'll answer it again. I've seen nine and ten line ones, but not this ugly. They were more lots of algebra, routine, substitution. No, another substitution. Oh, they made a substitution inside of a substitution inside of a substitution, but they were easy to spot. But this was tough. Anyhow, the rest of the class is yours. I was hoping to be finished by 25 after. I went a bit longer, but you can work on the quiz. You can practice the identities. Hopefully, you're starting to swim some laps.


Welcome to my video. If you've clicked on this one you're probably thinking about trying out intermittent fasting or either doing intermittent fasting or you're just interested in it and you know it's clearly well to be honest with you if I hadn't made this video probably three years ago it would have gone a lot better but you know behind the ball game a little bit but I do use intermittent fasting myself. I have used it probably for the best part of the last two years especially when I'm trying to drop body weight or drop body fat and there's certain you know there's certain things that you need to keep consistent with it to to be successful. There's also certain risks that you run using intermittent fasting as far as you know binging at the end of the night and things like that so I'm just gonna quickly run through you guys my experience how I use it and you know you can make up your mind from there. So intermittent fasting I first heard of basically when you know twin muscle workout TMW first came out probably four years ago and they used intermittent fasting to to cut down and get shredded for the first time in their lives I think so I saw that and I at that stage I didn't even realize you know the notion of calories in versus calories out so I mean at the end of the day behind intermittent fasting and getting results with intermittent fasting you need to be in a caloric deficit obviously so myself once I start eating I find it I find it extremely hard to stop especially if it's something nice so the way I use intermittent fasting is I'll wake up in the morning usually I'll wake up you know no more than an hour before work so I don't have too much time to think about things I'll get a caffeinated drink of my choice so that's either you know a fat burner it might be a coffee something like that usually it's a coffee or amino energy is my other top supplement that I really enjoy which is by optional nutrition so anything with caffeine in it basically what that will do is blunt my appetite and give me the energy I need to get through the first part of the day without consuming any food so I'll easily you know go five six hours even seven hours in the morning without consuming any food and people are scared I don't know what you're scared of like are you afraid that you're not gonna have the brain power to function on no food well you know coming from me coming from personal experience obviously not gonna be the same for everyone but I feel sharp man I feel really sharp in the mornings if I go and smash myself with a lot of carbs first thing in the morning not only do I feel sluggish but I also feel even more hungry two or three hours later so if I don't have anything that hunger goes and it stays away and you know if I get up at seven eight o'clock in the morning come two or three o'clock I am pretty fucking hungry and what I usually do is depending on when I'm actually working out that day let's say I'm finishing work at five I'm working out at six I'll start eating around about the two or three o'clock mark so that I can have one or two good meals before I go and train so the worst thing you want to do that like the worst I find myself doing this sometimes and I'm like why the fuck did I do that is going through the whole well going through those first six or seven hours of the day not eating having a workout planned you know later on in the day and not getting the nutrition in before you work out that you need for that workout so the danger you run with intermittent fasting is your performance can drop if you don't structure your intake of calories around the time you train so regardless you know regardless of what day it is I'll most probably spend the first five or six hours of the day without eating I'll have one or two meals before I train and then I'll have the majority of my calories after I train or at night when you know when you do go out for dinner you do go over to a friend's place you do have dessert and things like that so what it allows me to do is still is function really well in the first part of the day still structure my nutrition around my workout but most importantly it allows me to eat the majority of my calories at night and that's when that's when I enjoy eating you know I if I go to bed satisfied it's well it's a lot it's a lot better than going to bed hungry right so if I if I space my meals out all throughout the day stopped eating it you know seven eight seven or eight o'clock at night I'd be going to bed you know relatively hungry and that is a feeling I can't deal with I just can't and when I'm cussing I realize that there are gonna be times when you have to go to bed hungry so what I do I flip it around and I go hungry first thing in the morning and go to bed satisfied because I've eaten most of my calories late at night so I know I've been rambling but that's that's how I do it yeah the you know there have been far fetched claims thrown around that I've heard of people saying that you know if you fast for 24 hours your human growth hormone production can be boosted by you know a thousand percent or something like that hey I've gone 24 hours faster it's too long it really is you know I've done a couple of videos on 24 hour fasts actually and you know if you could do a consistent 24 hour fast every two days man you'd be you'd be getting shredded real fast but that was way way too long for me especially if you're trying to include a workout of sorts on a day where you don't eat anything at all man it's it's just counterproductive so you know the main goal in bodybuilding guys is to first build the muscle and put on the body fat and then you know the art of bodybuilding is to cut down cut the fat and maintain the muscle right so you got to get as lean as possible with the most amount of muscle as possible now that's the art of bodybuilding and if you can use intermittent fasting to your advantage to help you do that well by all means I say go for it you know right now it's 12 o'clock it's midday I got up at 8 all I've had is probably a total of about two to 250 milligrams caffeine with a coffee and then with a amino drink and you know I'm feeling fine I'm feeling I'm not hungry at all but I mean in saying that I ate right up until I went to bed last night obviously still staying under my my certain amount of calories per day that I want to stay under but at the end of the day I wake up and I'm not hungry and I can push through so that's how I use it it's worked well for me at the end of the day guys you can't let yourself binge and then at night you know if you go through the first part of the day till 2 o'clock don't start eating a shitload just have a couple of small meals you know especially before you train you don't need heaps so I find that if I take in you know 50 grams of carbs and 50 grams of protein once or twice before I go and train I feel like that's enough for me for you you know it might be different I'm not sure depending on what your current calories what your current macro limits are right now I'm probably aiming for around about 2,500 calories I am cutting that is a good amount for me to cut on I'm still satisfied especially when I have most my meals at the end of the day so whatever calorie amount you're on whether it be 2000 fucking 3000 whatever clearly you still have to stick to that so use you know use a 24-hour period to calculate your your total calories and macros don't use you know two-hour periods or six-hour periods because you're going you know if if you fast till to eat till 10 that's that's 8 hours eating that's a 16 hour fast every single day so yeah even and you know not even in 24 hour blocks do it in 48 hour blocks so let's say you got 2,500 calories a day that means you've got 5,000 calories that you can consume in every 48 hours so maybe that'll make it easier I mean I've heard of people do it weekly you know maybe one day they'll smash the calories they'll go like for you know 4,000 5,000 when they're only meant to be having 2,500 but then they'll take it back over the next six days and at the end of the week that's still lost weight so it's up to you how you do it that's just a little bit of information from me to you I hope it's made sense I haven't read them too much I'll probably cut a little bit of it out so anyways subscribe for more give us a like that it means more than you know and I'll definitely be doing more videos like that's in the future so for now have a great day train hard make some gains and I'll see you in the next one peace