Sell, sell, sell. What's up, Money Geeks, Mr. V here. Welcome to the new video, guys. So in today's video, I'm gonna take a look at how to sell a stock in Weibo. The different options you have selling your stock on Weibo. I did a video on how to buy your first stock on Weibo. I'm gonna hook that video up here so you can definitely go check it out. So now that you bought your stock and the price went up and now you're looking at, hey, I wanna sell the stock in a mix of money. So how do you go about placing that order? So before we get started, guys, if you're new to the channel, we'll talk about how to earn money, how to save money, how to invest, and how to build wealth. So if that's something that interests you, go ahead and hit that subscribe button and the notification bell so you don't miss out on new content. So if you are new to the platform and you've gone through the process, again, like I said, if you buy your first stock and the price went up, now you're looking like, hey, how do I sell that stock? So I'm gonna show you that right here, right now. So let's bring up the Weibo app here so we can definitely take a look and see how you can sell that first stock. So if you look into the Weibo app, let me just go back here.  So for me, I do have a lot of stocks here and some of these stocks are the ones that I just got them because I wanted to get that growth, not so much because I wanna hold them for long term. So now if I wanna sell one of the stocks, what I can do is I can come in here, I look at the stock, I can say, okay, let's say for instance, I have, let me just pick one here, scroll down here. Just give me a second here, guys. Okay, let's say I wanna sell, because okay, look at that, I'm down $900 on this particular company and so I want to sell one of their shares. So what I can do here is I do a sell order which is gonna come up here and by no means, I don't wanna sell it right now because I know the stock is gonna bounce back but I just wanna show you guys for demo. So if I go under the sell order, I can say the amount that I wanna sell it for. So if I put in my amount, let's say I wanna sell it for, let's say $10, a share, the quantity that I want to is, I just wanna sell one share of that particular stock. And so I put in my information, then notice that I chose a limit order. So in this case, until the price hits $10, this order will never execute. That's the beauty about it. So it's a limit order. So I can do a market order, but when I was recording this video, it was, the market was close already. So that's why I'm doing a limit order so that whenever the market opens and the stock hits $10, it's gonna sell. Once you do that, if you want it to just be there until you cancel it, you do a GTC. So that's good to cancel. If you want it just for a particular, just one day, you do just for that particular day. At the end of the day, it would cancel the order. If the order didn't get executed. And if you want the order to execute after hours, you check after hours here. And the advantage, and this is one of the things that people that trade or we both have that if you trade on the platform like Robinhood, you will not get this because you don't have this after-hour trade. It's extended-hour trading, excuse me. You don't have extended-hour trading on Robinhood. So once you order, you feel comfortable with your order. You, all you have to do here is go ahead and hit send. So you see, it's telling me that there's a large difference between the current stock price and the amount I want to sell. And I'm gonna leave that because I don't want to actually sell it. I just want to use this for the demo. So if I say continue, okay, oh, the market is close to ready. So too bad guys. But if the market were still open, I just click sell and the order would go in. And if my price hit $10, it would sell it for me. And that's it and I have everything ready to go. So pretty much that's how easy it is for you to sell a stock in Weibo. Question of the day, guys. What do you think about it? It was an easy process. Do you prefer Weibo over other platforms? How do you compare Weibo and Robinhood? Let me know in the comment section. If you haven't already subscribed to YouTube channel, go ahead and hit that subscribe button because YouTube tells me that 90% of you guys watching haven't already subscribed. And as always guys, stay motivated.


Hi this is Tom Wolf. As we go through the budget process here in Harrisburg, I remain focused on three priorities. We need to have a truly balanced budget, one that has sustainable revenues attached to it. We need to have a budget that invests in education at all levels. And we need to have a budget that makes an adequate investment to counter the heroin crisis, the epidemic that we're facing here in Pennsylvania. That's what we need, that's what I want in this budget, and I will continue to work with the legislature to try to achieve all these things and move Pennsylvania forward.


everyone and welcome, this is Melissa Arma with the Stock Swoosh and Revealing BA. BA was the option of the day. I called the 190 puts yesterday. It ran down into the clothes. The trade was up into the clothes yesterday, but I had a good feeling about it. It doesn't expire until 10.20. And then we had a nice gap down in this this morning. So beautiful move down. Again, low the day was 183.17. You could have got out of it today. You could still be in it. But again, obviously, this is so far through the strike now that I don't think this retraces even if we get a bounce here. It's quarter of one on a Friday into the weekend, a very long week, it seems, with the geopolitical events. And it's gonna be an even longer week next week for the market as well. So, earnings season is off to a good start today. We had a bunch of things to talk about in the room. We sure to BA today as a day trade as well, but obviously the put really was the put of the week because this really to have to be in something in an options trade and have it follow through and continue in the gap down is what is so powerful and one of the most powerful things to do up with options. Cause again, this closed here, 196.07 that open here, boom, the following day, which was 10.12 fell, and then we did it. So again, to capture this overnight is exactly what you want when you're doing options. So again, it's not that I predicted this would be down this morning and opening around 185 and change, but I knew the stock was lower. We were playing it. So very happy that it moved as quick and fast as it did cause obviously we just did this yesterday. So, and actually talked about it yesterday in the room too, you could have day traded this yesterday, which I think some people did. So very nice move to the downside here in BA. Again, momentum is real. So we're playing momentum. I like to short for those of you that know what I do. If you're interested in signing up for the Golden Gap course there's only three more classes before the end of the year. That's crazy, but it's true. So the next class is October 21st and 22nd, which is next weekend. And then there's only two more after that. It's a good time though to join in a good time to trade. We're getting the volatility, we're getting the momentum, we're getting the moves, we're getting everything we could want and more. So good luck with BA. And if you're still in it, ride it out. If you did it and got out today, pat yourself in the back, it was great train. Again, goal is 100%, we're up more than 100% in this today and you could have got out. So have a great week and everyone. If you're interested in the Golden Gap course, email me and Melissa at thestockswish.com.


Hi, I'm Myra Sutton. I'm Katitsa Rodriguez. We are with the Electronic Frontier Foundation and we're here in Lima, Peru for the 17th round of the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiations, which are happening right there in that hotel, the JW Marriott, on the beach of Miraflores Lima. And we're here because we've been following the TPP for a couple years now and we know what's in this agreement because of a leak from February 2011. And based upon that leak, we know that it has provisions that enforce DRM, digital locks, and criminalization of distributing anti-circumvention measures. It carries more liabilities for online service providers and internet service providers. It expands copyright terms globally by another 20 years. And it has even an expansive definition of what a copy is to include temporary copies. And if that's actually enforced, it would literally break the internet and break everything that we do every day on our own personal devices and our laptops. And so it's the biggest and maybe they're trying to make it the final global trade agreement. We are here at the Marriott. It's just funny because I think that this trade agreement is trying to make a global norm of IP enforcement. We are trying to just make the worst part of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as a global treaty through the APEC region or through the APEC countries. Once the APEC countries or the countries that are part of the TPP sign into this agreement, there will be more and more people trying to join. This is still really dangerous because there are many other countries who have developed norms that are much more progressive and more flexible and more innovative than the US DMCA or the copyright law from the United States. We are really concerned because we have been doing policy for the last 10, 15 years in several international governmental organizations. And in internet policy we have already developed a lot of new ways for civil society participation on the development of internet policy. In this negotiation they are just having the oldest style way of doing policy which is make people from civil society on the street without being able to actually have access to the actual text of the agreement and actually being able to see what each state is saying. The internet and the way of doing policy globally has advanced so much in international venues that really TPP is really all fashion, it's really outdated, it's really secretive. So I think that needs to change. They are dealing with the internet and they cannot just keep us out. Our internet! To get more information please visit nonegosciable.p or go to eff.org slash issues slash TPP to learn to take action and to learn more about the exact provisions that we are most worried about. Thank you.


My name is Sherry North. I'm a returning from Iraq. I had someone who convinced me that there was this greener pastures out there. I left Ghana here on the 18th of April. It was very horrific. My passport was confiscated on the very day I arrived and we were being kept somewhere, not just me. There were other ladies too that I met. You've been forced to work. The more treatment was so bad. Some of us were sexually abused. From that point I started thinking of how to get back home. Yeah I was very happy when they reunited me with my family. It took some time. I had to see the psychologist at the shelter there and I was reintegrated into the society again. When the outbreak came first you could go outside and advertise your goods and sell. But then when the total lockdown came you can't move out and people can also come to you. And at that very point of time two people were not into the buying of clothing. The IM came to my aid again, supported my family with food stamps. With the nurse max. The later I could also do to help out there. So at least I could also save some life out there. So if I still have to do a nurse badge of nurse max to save more lives out there I'll still do. We did 500 pieces. Aside the sewing too I wanted to be a journalist. Currently with the help of the IOM I've now been enrolled in green media. My advice to my fellow young women out there is I wouldn't want them to go through that. Perhaps I might be lucky to come back home but I know that some of my sisters out there and their families can't even trace them.


Do you like if I think socks? And I have a fabulous tea to drink. Isn't this like a social media trend, don't they say? Something about drinking tea, sipping tea means like, there's gossip or drama going around. Cause I mean, I guess there's gossip and drama going around about how many unboxing videos I do in like, a week. We're gonna put the tea over here and we're gonna do another unboxing. So I went to my US post to outlet again so that I could pick up multiple parcels. I actually got some stuff related to model versus on the trip. The main thing that I get when I go is testers don't go. So I actually got six cans. Wow. And then I actually bought this which I didn't think I could get in Canada but then I was at Home Depot and it was totally there. So we're gonna try this one. I really like Rust-Oleum cause they have really good like spray nozzle. Let's start with the first box. This is the good stuff. This is the nice soft, flowy bubble wrap. Hey! Got that new Briah smell. It's not perfect but he's very cute. So this is Aintree. This is a Briar Fest special run, 2012. I've been looking for him for a while. He's on the cigar mold. Kind of a buckskinny done color and I'm a sucker for buckskinny done so I needed to have him. He was one of the ones that like people aren't super in love with so he's actually been really cheap most of the time. That's the first dude. This is the next dude. This guy. This is Maestro Gorgeous. I don't know how to say his name. This model I actually don't have. It's on a cylindrical mold and it's going to be a body. So I wanted to paint a cylindrical. I really love the cylindrical mold. It has so much character to it and I'd love to like re-sculpt his braids. This one doesn't come with a stand.  And this one, I know which one this is. Oh this is a totally different worst than I thought it was. Okay, so, okay. This is Sheik and he's in actually pretty rough condition. I was hoping that he would be in nice condition but maybe he's okay. He doesn't stand, according to her. So he needs an adjustment on the leg. But he's super cute. I don't know, I love leopard apollosa. This mold is like kind of clanky and kind of ugly but the leopard apollosa is fun so I wanted to add him to my collection. I kind of have like a semi-collection that like if I ever have kids I would love to give them and these are the kind of horses that I would give them because it's really fun. This is so exciting. He's a weird color. Oh but he's awesome.  Look at him.  So this is Samson. This was the tractor supply company special rod. I needed to get him because buckskin. Okay, okay. So this is Haqan, the other tractor special supply rod model. Oh he does come with the stance, perfect. And it is a leopard buckskin apollosa and it's kind of like they stole it from me before I got to do it because this was the color I originally wanted to paint my sparky charms and then they did it for me. So they released two buckskin tractor supply special runs and of course I had to get both and then they also had this one which is very exciting. I recently fell in love with this mold and now I'm obsessed with it and I want all the models on it. Oh my gosh. Oh he's so pretty. Breyer does not do chestnuts enough. Like just a really nice rich chestnut. This guy is Kelly Ente and he was the 2008 Breyer Tour Limited Edition model. So he's a little bit older. He's really hard to find. You do not see this guy very often and he's super rich chestnut with like faded pale dapples in there and he's just stunning. I love this mold. This mold has so much light in the hair and the personality. Fabulous. Just fabulous. I saved the best for last.  Actually these are green. They match my studio logo so I like his handle things and green packing peanuts. So I'm not even mad about this. So this is very very kind. Oh my god. I can't believe I have this model. I didn't think I would ever own this model. Oh my god. Oh my god. Oh my gosh.  This is Galahad. He doesn't actually have a print which is weird but he's a Breyerfest special runner. I'm not sure what year because it doesn't say on his belly but he's like a chestnut, a darker chestnut with a shimmery knitted tail. So he's very similar to Caliente but you can definitely tell that he's like more of a silver bay or flaxen chestnut versus like a true chestnut. So I went back and forth with these two models and I'm like I don't know which one I want and link them both so now I have the set and I am in love. I love these guys. This has been a pretty good haul I'd say. This has been fun. This has been a great time, a grand old time. So thank you so much for watching. Happy collecting and achieving holy chaos because it's the best thing.


This lecture is part of an online Ganawar theory course and will be about the norm and the trace of an extension of fields. So we will take k contained m to be a finite extension of fields. Now, if alpha is an element of m, then multiplication by alpha. So we might take any element v in m to alpha times v is a linear transformation. So here we're thinking of m as being just a vector space over k and we're thinking of the linear transformation of m as a vector space. So we don't really worry about its field structure. And this linear transformation has a trace and a determinant, like all linear transformations, which are just going to be elements of k. And in the case of the special linear transformation and multiplication by alpha, these are called the trace of alpha and not the determinant of alpha, the norm of alpha. So as you see, terminology has, as usual, got slightly muddled up. For example, let's just work out the trace and norm when the extension is r contained in the complex numbers. So it's degree two. And let's take alpha to be a complex number x plus i y. And we want to compute what this linear transformation is. So let's pick a basis, one and i for the complex numbers. And then multiplication by x plus i y is given by two by two matrix in this basis. And you can easily check it's x y minus y x. So the trace is two x, which is two times the real part of alpha. And the norm is x squared plus y squared, which is the absolute value of alpha squared.  So let's try and calculate the trace and norm for an element of an extension. So first suppose that m is equal to k of alpha. In other words, alpha generates m as an extension of k. Well, then look at the minimal polynomial of alpha. So it's going to be alpha to the n plus a n minus one alpha to the n minus one and so on plus a naught. And now this is the same as the characteristic polynomial considered as a linear transformation. And there are two ways of seeing this. You can either use the Cayley Hamilton theorem, which implies it immediately. And if you forgot what the Cayley Hamilton theorem is, I'm not going to tell you what it is, but you'll then just have to use the other way, which is we can calculate the characteristic polynomial using the basis one alpha, alpha squared, up to alpha to the n minus one. So you can either do it by explicit calculation or by quoting the Cayley Hamilton theorem. So the trace of alpha is just minus this coefficient of the characteristic polynomial or minimal polynomial. So it's minus a n minus one and the norm of alpha is plus or minus a zero, depending on whether n is even or odd. And in particular, we see the trace is just the sum of the roots of the minimal polynomial. So if I call this p of x, this is just the sum of the roots of p. And this is equal to the product of the roots of p. Notice that the roots are not necessarily in the extension m because this might not be Galois, but the roots are in K contained and K alpha contained in the splitting field. So the roots are contained in the splitting field and you can then add up all the roots and that's an element of K. And you can also think of this as being the sum of all conjugates of alpha under some large Galois group. You've got to be a little bit more careful if alpha does not generate m. It's a bit annoying that things behave differently if alpha does not generate m, because otherwise you could define the norm and the trace just by looking at the minimum polynomial, but this just doesn't work in general. So in general what happens is K is contained in K of alpha which is contained in m and you can then check that in general if alpha has minimal polynomial, alpha to the n plus a n minus 1 alpha to the n minus 1 and so on equals 0, then you can see the trace of alpha is now a n minus 1 times the index of K alpha in m. That's not very difficult to check. I'll just leave it as an exercise. And similarly the norm of alpha, which I'll denote by n, is equal to plus or minus a 0 to the power of this degree. In particular we notice that the trace of alpha and the norm of alpha depend on which field you are using. So the trace of alpha in the field K of alpha is not usually the same as the trace of alpha in the bigger field of m. For this reason people sometimes write trace of m over K of alpha and norm of m over K of alpha in order to be completely unambiguous. But the problem with being unambiguous is the notation gets so cluttered up it becomes hard to read. So quite often it's better just to write trace or norm and cope with the ambiguity. By the way in some older books the trace is sometimes called the spur of alpha and written sp. If you get annoyed about the fact that the trace depends on which field you're working on you can work with the absolute trace. So the absolute trace is you take the trace of m over K of alpha for any extension m containing alpha and you then divide it by the index and you can see that this then doesn't vary if you replace m by bigger field. I don't really recommend doing this because the problem is this might be 0 if you're working in a field of characteristic p greater than 0. So you sometimes find this breaks down. You can try and do the same and define an absolute norm. You take norm of m over K and you raise it to the power of 1 over the index of m over K and this is even worse than the trace because you can't always take these roots and even if you do take roots it's kind of ambiguous. It occasionally works. One case when it does work is if you take the extension r contained in C and then the absolute trace is just the real part because you're dividing the trace we worked out earlier by 2 and the absolute norm is then just the absolute value. So apart from this special case the absolute trace and the absolute norm seem to be more trouble than they are worth. Next we'll have a few examples of traces and norms turning up in number theory. There's a sort of problem you get quite a lot in algebraic number theory, especially in class field theory where you have some extension of fields or possibly rings of a dels or whatever and you want to know what is the quotient of the non-zero elements of K by the norm of the non-zero elements of m. So this is going to be a group and it turns out quite a lot. It turns out to be a sort of zero-taked cohomology group if you're into taked cohomology which partly explains why it's so common. So let's just give some examples of this. First of all let's just take r contained in C. Well then you've got the non-zero real numbers divided by norms of non-zero complex numbers which is just the real numbers over positive real numbers which is a group of order two. So it's a group of order two whose elements we might write as plus or minus one. Let's look at another example. Let's just take q contained in the Gaussian numbers q of i and then you know q star is sort of generated by elements minus one, two, three, five and so on and q of i is similarly generated by units and then we have to take the primes of q of i which are one plus i and three two plus or minus i, seven, eleven, three plus or minus two i and so on and if you take the norms of these you get one, two, three squared, five, seven squared, eleven squared, thirteen and so on. So what's happening is primes that are one mod four factor into the product of two Gaussian primes and primes that are three mod four don't. So you can now see what q modulo norms is. It's basically a sum of a lot of groups of order two corresponding to minus one, three, seven, eleven and so on. So we see that q star modulo the norm of q i star is sort of encoding a lot of information about which primes are sums of two squares and things like that. So this just indicates that this group can be both interesting and quite complicated. So the final example of k star over norm of m star we're going to look at is the case of finite fields. So let's take k and m to be finite. So k has order q for some prime power q and m has order that's number of elements q to the n. So k star has order q minus one and m star has order q to the n minus one. And let's calculate what is the norm of some element alpha for alpha in m. Well, if we've got a Galois extension you can see the trace of any element alpha is just the sum over g in the Galois group of g of alpha. And similarly the norm of alpha is just the sum of g over the Galois group of, so it's just the product of g in the Galois group of g of alpha. If alpha generates this Galois extension then this follows almost immediately because these expressions here are the two coefficients of the minimal polynomial giving the trace and the norm. If alpha doesn't generate m then you have to think about it slightly longer which I'm not going to bother to do. So anyway, using this we can now calculate the norm of the number alpha because we know what the Galois group is, g is generated by the Frobenius and in this case the Frobenius element takes alpha to alpha to the q which is the order of k. So this is not quite the same as taking alpha to alpha to the p which is the Frobenius over the finite field of order p. So the elements of g consist of one phi squared up to phi to the n minus one. So the norm of alpha is just equal to alpha times alpha to the q times alpha to the q squared up to times alpha to the q to the n minus one which is alpha to the one plus q plus q squared plus q to the n minus one. So the norm in a finite field is rather easy to write down and obviously you can write down a similar expression for the trace which we won't need. Now let's look at the map from k star rather the map from m star to k star and this has a kernel consisting of the things with norm alpha equal one and this is order q to the n minus one and this is order q minus one and let's think about how many elements alpha have norm one. Well this says alpha to the one plus q plus q to the n minus one minus one equals naught and you notice this is a polynomial equation so it is at most one plus q plus q to the n minus one roots. So this group here has order at most that. Well now the image has order greater than or equal to q to the n minus one over the order of the kernel so the order of the kernel is at most that so the image has order at most this sorry that's the one in the exponent by action which is equal to q minus one so the image has the same order as k star so the map from m star to k star given by taking the norm is onto. So in this case k star over norm of m star is equal to the trivial group. So that's one place the norm turns up it turns up because you want to take k star module of the norm of an extension field quite often. The other application we're going to look at is the following problem. Find the algebraic integers in some algebraic number fields. So just recall what an algebraic integer is. An algebraic integer alpha is something that is a root of x to the n plus a n minus one x to the n minus one plus a naught equals naught with all a i in z. And what distinguishes this from a general algebraic number is the coefficient of the leading term is just one. So you can see that ordinary integers are just the rational numbers with this property. And we can recall that alpha is an algebraic integer is equivalent to saying that z of alpha is a finitely generated module over z. And from this it easily follows that if alpha and beta algebraic integers, so are alpha plus or minus beta and alpha times beta. So the algebraic integers in any given algebraic number field form a ring. And the problem is to find out what this ring is and this can be quite tricky. For example, let's look at z root minus, sorry, let's look at q root minus three and ask what are the algebraic integers in it. And the obvious guess is z root minus three. And this is wrong because as we've seen there's a cube root of unity omega which is minus one plus root minus three over two. And this doesn't have integer coefficients when you write it as a polynomial in root minus three but omega squared plus omega plus one equals zero, so it's still an algebraic integer. And finding the algebraic integers in a given algebraic number field is actually a really rather tricky problem. But the norm and the tracing give some help in finding this and I'm just going to illustrate this for quadratic number fields. So we can ask what are the algebraic integers of q root n where I'm going to take n to be square free because you would just miss out any square factors and I'm going to take n to be an integer. So let's take an element alpha equals a plus b root n in q root n.  Actually it's really easy to figure out when alpha is an algebraic integer just by kind of looking at the formula for the root of a quadratic equation but we're going to do it using norm and trace just to illustrate that norm and trace is sometimes useful. Well the key point is that if alpha is an algebraic integer this implies the norm of alpha and the trace of alpha are integers because they are algebraic integers and they're in the rational numbers they must be ordinary integers. So the trace of alpha which is 2 alpha, 2a is an integer and the norm of alpha which is a plus b root n times a minus b root n is a squared minus b squared n is also an integer. And let's see what we can deduce about this. Well obviously a and b can be any integers and that will give alpha an algebraic integer so the question is when can we have an algebraic number alpha with a and b not integers and we see from this that a must either be an integer or it could be an integer plus a half and we can then just subtract the integer and ask can a be a half? And if a is a half this implies that norm of alpha equals a half squared minus b squared n is an integer. So this means b squared n is in the integers plus a quarter so 4b squared n is an integer and since b is square free this implies 2b is also an integer. And if b is an integer then you can easily check that a can't be half an integer so the only possibility is a equals a half b equals a half so we can ask is a half plus a half root n an algebraic integer and if you work it out from the norm of this is a quarter minus a quarter n so we must have n congruent to 1 mod 4 so we found out what the algebraic integers of q root n are here n is in z and is square free so if n is congruent to 1 mod 4 it's generated by z and we can have 1 plus root n over 2 on the other hand if n is congruent to 2 or 3 mod 4 then all we get is the obvious ones where we where we include the square root of n over z so next lecture we'll be looking at another application of the trace for defining a bilinear form on m in fact we define a bilinear form on m by saying alpha beta is the trace of alpha beta and this bilinear form turns out to be really useful


Russians lost at least six Zoo Park 1M critical detection systems. They are difficult to replace. Russia appears to have lost at least half a dozen hard-to-replace radar systems that have played an important role in Ukraine, helping its forces find and destroy Ukrainian artillery. Business Insider Outlet wrote about it. Western intelligence believes Moscow may only have a few left in the fight. Ukraine's Special Operations Forces recently published footage showing a Russian Zoo Park 1M counter-battery radar being destroyed according to intelligence update from Britain's Defense Ministry. Britain's Defense Ministry said both Ukraine and Russia have been constantly trying to eliminate each other's counter-battery radars through the 13-month-long war. These systems are relatively few in number, but are a significant force multiplier. The ministry noted in its update, they allow commanders to rapidly locate and strike enemy artillery. However, because they have an active electromagnetic signature, they are vulnerable to being detected and destroyed, the Defense Ministry said. It added that Russian forces have lost at least six of these systems and only likely has a very limited number left in Ukraine. In a grinding war that has featured heavy exchanges of artillery, systems like these are critical to have in the arsenal. According to an open-source intelligence analysis from Oryx, Russia has seen at least seven Zoo Park 1M radars destroyed, damaged or captured, a similar figure to what the UK has provided.


I'm here before the Oscars with the icon of fashion Tommy Hilfiger I'm gonna ask him a question three tips for branding first branding tip Unique idea unique idea. You think people don't do that enough. I think the idea has to be extremely All right number two Great The three give the customer what they want before they know what they want like a little Steve Jobs All right, I'm here with the man the myth the legend Tommy Hilfiger Having a little lunch before the Oscars and you were giving me these three brands By three ideas for branding for entrepreneurs Watch it if you could go back and be 18 year old 18 again and you had to have one Concept pounded into your head that you think would make you even more successful than you've already been. What do you wish somebody? I told you in 18 To really pay attention to the business part of the business In addition to the creative part because in the very beginning when I just focused on the creative My business acumen wasn't there. I need both to succeed. Hmm It's amazing favorite book Favorite book. I like the Steve Jobs book. I just read. Oh really the new one. Yeah Best mentor you ever had best mentor Leonard Lauder of the Estee Lauder company Was that genius was the instrumental and really helping you he was he was awesome


As a new era of health care dawns, advances in genomics are expanding our knowledge and changing our approach to patient care. This emerging landscape brings a wealth of new information and clinical tools for disease prevention, improved diagnosis, and opportunities for treatment. Educators are challenged to prepare their students for delivering competent genomic care. Practitioners are looking for information and tools they can use for the care of patients. As health care professionals are trying to make sense of it all, there is a website to make reaching these goals easier. The Genetics Genomics Competency Center website, or G2C2, is designed for health care educators and practitioners who seek high quality educational resources on the many practical topics within genetic and genomic medicine. G2C2 provides a centralized, professionally curated, searchable collection of over 1,000 resources, including websites, books, online courses, and videos. Each resource is linked to skills or competencies specific to individual health care disciplines. Most resources are suitable for use in classroom and clinical settings, or for individual study, and many are free. G2C2 also provides resource-specific information, such as availability of continuing education credits, and type and purpose of the resource. G2C2 then leads the user directly to the resource through links. Covered topics include basic genetic concepts, pharmacogenetics, pharmacogenomics, inherited disorders, genetic counseling, ethical issues, and much more. Every resource on G2C2 is peer-reviewed by an impartial committee of expert genetic counselors, nurses, pharmacists, physician assistants, and physicians. In addition to identifying resources, a G2C2 user can review discipline-specific genetic-genomic competencies and upload new educational resources for review and inclusion in the collection. Explore the website to find genetics-genomics educational materials useful for your needs.


say that is public key algorithm myself Rashmi Dixie. So learning outcome at the end of this session students will be able to explain public key requirements. They are also able to explain what is RSA and what are the steps of RSA and because of which they are able to generate pair of keys using RSA algorithm. So first we will check out what are public key requirements. Public key algorithms rely on two keys where it is compulsory of having computationally infeasibility and computationally easiness. So what is a means of computationally infeasible? It is computationally infeasible to find decryption key by knowing only algorithm and encryption key. And what is computationally easy? It is computationally easy to encrypt or decrypt message when relevant keys are known. So either of the two related keys can be used for encryption with the other used for decryption using the SUM algorithm. And these are forbidden requirements which only a few algorithms have satisfied. So we have seen what are public key requirements. Now we will look out the two more definitions how the security of public key schemes have defined. So it needs a trapdoor one-way function. Now what is one-way function or what is the characteristic of one-way function? Y is a function of X become called as easy and it is not possible to find out X by getting or by applying a inverse of function on a Y. It is somewhat or it is infeasible to get X by applying inverse function on a Y. It is called as one-way function. Now the next definition is trapdoor one-way function. Now what is that Y by applying function on X is easy if K and X are known X by applying inverse function on a Y is easy if K and Y are known but X by applying Y sorry by applying inverse function on a Y is infeasible if Y is known but K is not known. A practical public key scheme depends on a suitable trapdoor one-way function. So it is not possible to get original message by applying reverse function on a cipher text no matter either algorithm is known or key is known. So what are the public key requirements? Like private key schemes brute force exhaustive search attack is always theoretically possible but the keys used are too large which is a greater than 512 bits. Security relies on a large enough differences in a difficulty between easy and hard. The third one is more generally the hard problem is known but is made hard enough to be impractical to break. Problem knowing is different than problem breaking and it requires the use of very large numbers hence is slow compared to private key schemes. Now RSA it is a algorithm by three scientists Rivest, Shamir and Adelman of MIT which is built in a year of 1977. It is best known and widely used public key scheme or public key crypto sorry public key algorithm. It is based on exponential in a finite or Galois field over integers modulo apri. Here it is a characteristic of RSA it is based on modulo apri nb exponential takes on an average big O of log n to the cubical operations. It uses large integers up to 1024 bits and provide security due to cost of factoring large numbers nb factorization takes big O of e raise to log n log n log n operation which is hard. Now what is a use of RSA encryption or how it decryption or how it is built to encrypt a message m the sender obtain a public key of a receiver that is public key two public keys e and n then compute that is cipher text m raise to e mod n where m is between 0 to n and to decrypt a cipher text c the owner uses its own private key which is defined as a pr d and n and computes that is message from the cipher text c raise to d mod n. Now note that the message m must be smaller than the modulus of n that is important point. Now these are the steps of RSA how to generate RSA key that is a public key and private key e n and d n so e and d. So each user generates a public and private key pair by it is purely a mathematical. So start with a selecting two large prime numbers let us say as a p and q then computing their system modulus by taking the multiplication and then taking the mod that is p minus 1 q minus 1 up to that then selecting at random the encryption key e. Now what is a rule for that e it is between 1 and mod of n that is 1 and the second one is gcd that is a greatest common divisor will give you only one that is a common between e and phi of n e is compulsory 1 means there should not be common between e and phi of n and then e d is equal to 1 mod phi of n that is a formula to find out the decryption key and d is between 0 to n. Remember that the publish their public encryption keys p u e and n and keep secret private decryption key that is d and n. How you can say that RSA will work fine finally or it will always gives you good result because it has a characteristic of a Euler's theorem a of phi of n mod n is equal to 1 where gcd between these two is 1 that is of important characteristic RSA by finding n by applying mod of n and then choosing carefully e and d such that it will try to give 100% security cd is equal to m e d where m is equal to 1 plus k multiplied by mod of n and m 1 and by applying 1 raise to k on that m we will get m raise m mod n and in this mathematical formula the security of RSA. Now just we will sort out or we will look out the one example in the next session we will solve the example. Now select primes we will just chosen randomly p17 q11 remember one thing for a calculation we have chosen two digit number numbers are so large or nowadays just think numbers might be anything. Now we are calculating n that is pq by taking the multiplication of 17 and 11 that is 187 then we are going to calculate the phi of n or modulus of n p minus 1 multiplied by q minus 1 that is 16 into 10 160. Now it is a time to select e it depends on a gcd e and phi of n should be 1 so you can choose any here I have taken e is equal to 7. Now it is a time to determine d so what is our formula d e that is a multiplication of d e is equal to 1 mod n 1 mod not n phi of n sorry so phi of n so 1 mod 160 and value of d should be less than 160. So by taking calculations here I find out d is 23 why you can also try to find out d 23 into 7 that is 161 so 161 10 into 160 plus 1 gives you 1 and now it is time to publish public key that is 7 and 187 that is e and n n is 187 by calculating p multiplied by q and keep secret private key now what is private key again d and n so by calculation d is 23 187 so that key will be private. Now student please pause the video and try to figure out the answer what is the question in RSA we select a value e such that it is in between 0 and phi of n and it is relatively prime to phi of n just look at the or just try to recall the algorithm you will get the answer is it true or false what is it is false we select what is the question we select a value e such that it lies between 0 and phi of n and it is relatively prime to phi of n so how we are going to find e we are taking the gcd of e and phi of n and after that we are going to choose the e so this is false so this is a reference thank you.


Long weekends are a great time to catch up with family and friends and in the cooler months There's nothing better than sitting around an open fire to stay warm However, it's important to remember how dangerous this can be if precautions aren't taken In our burns unit at the Alfred we see firsthand the damage that campfires, bomb fires and burn-offs cause people. Using accelerants on a fire is extremely dangerous, not only to you but to those around you. 20% of our patients are admitted with burns caused by accelerants thrown on fires such as petrol and diesel and these can leave our patients with devastating injuries for life. Please act responsibly around fires, never leave children alone near open flames and ensure all fires are fully extinguished when finished. If you're having a fire this weekend or around a fire this weekend, please look after yourself and don't end up here with us. If you're planning on having a fire this weekend, make sure we don't end up at your house.


business landscape these days. The success of every business depends on the quality of talent they are able to hire and retain. Exceptional companies understand that the best business decisions depend on their best people decisions. And these people decisions have to be based on how well they understand their workforce in terms of skill sets and capabilities. If you also look at the needs of the business in terms of skill sets, it has also drastically changed in the past decade. Most of the tasks, the business tasks or the industrial tasks which were rule based or knowledge based, they have either been automated or have become obsolete with time. The business leaders of 21st century, they demand and they seek a different set of skills in their employers. For example, they want their workforce to be agile in terms of learning, they want to learn new things and deliver performance. Therefore, they look at skills like teamwork, collaboration, persuasion skills, communication skills, etc. It is very, very critical to measure these skills for them now. Although it is very hard to measure these soft skills because it requires analysis of a lot of subjectivity. But thanks to the cloud computing and machine learning technologies that this process is now possible effortlessly at scale. And this is exactly what N-talents has been working on. N-talents is an artificial intelligence enabled talent management firm. We build solutions for talent evaluations and provide unparalleled accuracy in soft skill and behavioral competency evaluations. The N-talents talent management tool utilizes online assessment sessions which are audio visually simulated where we capture a lot of data in different formats like videos, audios and texts. The multi-format subjective responses consisting of videos, gamification data, digital behavior data is all evaluated using algorithms. We churn hundreds of candidate data points like facial expressions, number of words used, tonality, inflection of voice, micro gestures, digital behavior, decision making within the gamification data, etc. And churn all this to come up with a 360 degree psychological and cognitive profile of the candidate. This is a very very comprehensive profile and very useful in making people decisions. The questions and scenarios we build are very specific to the job role and industry which makes the tool even more accurate and reliable.


It's a movement where familiar devices will be able to leverage the internet and its massive computing power of cloud computing. As devices get connected, get smarter, they'll be able to take advantage of all the power generated at the cloud and on the intelligent edge. Distributed intelligence is here to stay and I was very proud of our engagement collectively all together over the past five years with innovators, with startups all collaborating together trying to take advantage of this opportunity.


There's a huge divide in the world of ideas between two camps, rationalists on one end and empiricists on the other. This divide has to do with the nature of knowledge, and in particular the relationship between theory and data, between concepts and experience. I think that the two main camps, rationalists and empiricists, get it wrong. They both make the counterpoint's error in an interesting way. And I think the correct method for thinking about the relationship between theory and data is to blend both rationalism and empiricism. So let me give you an example of what I see as dogmatic rationalism. I'll give you an example of dogmatic empiricism and then how my theory I think blends the two. So an example of dogmatic rationalism would look something like this. I start from a theoretical understanding about what types of things exist in the world. And I know that there are physical things and everything that exists must be fundamentally physical because to think otherwise is nonsensical. Therefore, when anybody reports they had some transcendental experience or they try to say God exists because such and such, or there's a supernatural quality to such and such, they are necessarily wrong because their claimed experience does not fit into my theory. So they dismiss the data, the reporting of some of these experiences, so that they can preserve their theory. I would say that's an example of dogmatic rationalism. The counterpoint is dogmatic empiricism and it goes something like this. I experienced God, therefore, God exists. I had a nature of my experience in a particular way and I'm going to theorize about the nature of that experience. And all of my theories that I build on top of my experience must be true because the experience itself was true. Data or experience speaks for itself. It builds its own theory. This I think is dogmatic empiricism. With the dogmatic rationalist, a lot of time you see this as people who are biased in times towards religion or strict philosophy tend to lean towards dogmatic rationalism and scientists, physicists, tend to lean towards dogmatic empiricism thinking that data speaks for itself. Both of these things are completely wrong. I think there's a beautiful harmony between the two. There's a phrase that I like to use, which I'll be using in the next big book that I'm writing called The Mind and the World, which is this. It kind of puts in context what we're doing with philosophy and trying to understand the world. The purpose of philosophy is to best explain the phenomena that we experience. So we theorize, but what we theorize about, the starting fundamental in our theories are what we experience. So you don't start a theory talking about angels and leprechauns, if you have no experience of those things. You start with the nature of your experience, which is sense data. There are colors going on. There are color blobs in my visual field. What is the cause of the color blobs? And then you might develop a theory about the existence of objects in the physical world. So that might seem very abstract. Let me give you a concrete application of using theory to best explain the phenomena we experience and it has to do with physics and the nature of ordinary objects. So I think the dogmatic rationalist says the world, the physical world is filled with objects that act in accordance with physical laws. You can read about these laws in textbooks. You start with textbook knowledge, start with the theories first, and then you try to fit your experiences into the theory. So I read about objects, I've read about physics. And that must be what these things are, I've got a little SD card here. This is the object that I read about. This thing going on right now correlates with the theory that I read about. So that must be what it is. I think that's mistaken. Let me give you the dogmatic empiricist approach. It says there's no such things as objects in the world.  All that exists is the experience that I'm having. There is just blackness in my visual field. There's just a tactile sensation. All objects are just bundles of sensations or bundles of perceptions. There's no object out there. I think that's also kind of silly. Let me give you what I think is a beautiful harmony between the two. We start with experience. We start with the fundamental. What is directly available to our consciousness? Our experience, my experience, is of a black and colored blob in my visual field. And I have some sensory, I have some feelings as well. They seem to be correlated by feelings seem to be over here, like with my tactile sensation. And I go, okay, the experience is happening. But what is the cause of the experience? I have lots of experiences like this. I have lots of different colors in my visual field. I have lots of different tactile sensations. Maybe it's the case that the cause of those experiences and the cause of the regularity of those experiences is because there's another world out there outside of my experience. And it's inhabited by, let's say, physical objects. There's a bunch of stuff. That stuff is clumped together, let's say, in ways that I've got sensory organs. And when my sensory organs interact with those clumps of matter, it gives me this experience. So now we're developing a theory out of the experience. We're not trying to fit the experience into a theory and we're not just trying to say, oh, the experience speaks for itself. Now when you do that, it also allows you to be wrong. This is what people don't seem to understand about theories, is that a lot of times they're wrong because the data doesn't speak for itself. I'll go back to the God examples, a great one. It very well may be the case that when you have religious experiences, spiritual experiences, I've had one, it forces you to expand your world view. As it did me, there's something else going on here when I experienced love, let's say, for the first time. But that doesn't mean that my first theoretical explanation is going to be correct, that doesn't, I can't say God exists because I had this experience. And what God is, is an omnipotent, omnibenevolent being who loves me and sent his son to die, or whatever religious interpretation or religious text you're talking about. Just because your experience doesn't fit into your theory, so you now have to expand your theory to incorporate the experience, doesn't mean that any old theoretical explanation will do. It might be that when I have the sensory experience of the SD card, I could say to myself, the cause of that is because there's an evil demon that is implanting experiences in my visual field, and that's the cause. I think that's a pretty crummy theoretical explanation. It is a theory, but I don't think it's a correct theory. So, when you take this approach, and you go through field by field, physics, philosophy, economics, mathematics, whatever. When you start from the experience, and then you build the theory, I think you get a much more coherent and less dogmatic, rational worldview that incorporates the beauty of pure theoretical reasoning with the beauty of pure data gathering.


Welcome folks, we have the Dow Industries trading up 100 Nasdaqs up 17, S&Ps up 1, Gold contract on the run, up 30 bucks, 2062oz, get Silver up 36 cents, $25.40 anoz, Laysweep crude up $1.61, $76.47 a barrel, notes and bonds, a 10-year note up 17 ticks, trading 109-17, the 30-year up 11 at 116, 12 in the 10-year folks, 4.334, pretty amazing, King dollar, King dollar just continues to give it up down 456, 102, 749, the euro is at 109, the end is trading out here at 147, British pound is at 126 to 1 US dollar, we don't want to take a look at the spy folks, bottom line spy still on an ABC structure up 462, you got a sideways move out here today, bottom line we're at 454, 462 is the number, we're going to go to notes and bonds man, we were talking about this all day yesterday, we've been talking for quite a while but bottom line is that what you had out here, you can see the monster volume that came in and this is, if you have the out of time in the trade you know that bottom line if you're coming into swings, either higher or lower and you get an expansion of volume, bottom line, the probabilities you're going to break meaning higher or lower and you can see this yesterday, it was a monster move man and now we're taking off like a rocket chip okay, that's under 10-year as well as the 30 and then if we get into the gold contract we were talking about the consolidation yesterday and some of the equities, some of the equities have already broken it and today we'll go through these but this is a big move top side folks, you get the consolidation that is broken in a lot of these equities and they go on top side in a big way, so right now we're at 2062, you get volume behind them with 182,000 contracts, bottom line it's all there and then we go to the dollar, you take a look at the dollar, the dollar just can't hold price, this is going to be faster than most of us actually think on the way down, you know right now you're at 102, 752 and it's the 99, 578, that's how this is shaking out and you can see actually where we are right now, there's not much that can hold this thing up, there's about five days of trading that goes all the way back to June, you know so this thing's going to basically accelerate on the way down and of course that accelerates on the way down, my take is that yeah S&P is only up one, S&P is also going to bust higher and I'm talking about a real bust top side, stay right there folks, come right back.


Hey you guys, coming to Kura Sushi with me. So first when we got there we noticed these really cute robots and sushi on conveyor belts. Look at how cute that robot is. The menu had so many options and I had to get another clip of this robot because it's so cute. Got some edamame and here's how you get your food and then you can get a speedy delivery and you just put your plates in here and that's it. Bye!


Welcome to All Hands Update, I'm Petty Officer Amara Timberlake with your headlines from Around the Fleet. The Navy Expeditionary Combat Command Pacific was established October 1st. The new command, located at Joint Base Pearl Harbor, Hickam, Hawaii, will provide administrative control for more than 10,600 Seabees, EOD Operators, Coastal Riverines and Support Staff. October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month. Domestic Violence cuts across all age groups and social classes. It happens to sailors as well as spouses and it affects both men and women. Domestic Violence can also go beyond physical abuse. If you think you may be a victim of domestic violence, contact the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-SAFE or visit your installation Fleet and Family Support Center for information on available resources. You can read more about these stories at navy.mil. From All Hands Update, thanks for watching.