So, are we enabling unapproved therapies by doing this? Do we? Is it the camel's nose under the tent? I mean, you know, we have a lot of questions with us. Well, they're going on.  If you've got any of these things show up in the hotel room on Sunday morning and we've got a cure. Yeah, exactly. So, it's kind of people who are at the end of their rope in terms of their health. Senator Engman has a question and Senator McQuarran, go ahead. Thank you.  But it's like, why didn't they give this to me sooner?  Medicated? Yeah, medicated. Not that I'm aware of other than, you know, it would go to your sort of capacity to provide informed consent depending on what it was in the process. And there could be some professional, I think, professional liability issues there. But otherwise... We don't specify what that has to be in the doctor's office. Because I'll get doing that, right? We can certainly look at doing that. Yeah, okay. Thank you. So, Senator McQuarran. There is a federal policy of right to try, right, for people that can act the end with puffing balloons. So we had looked at legislation on that in here. Yeah, that was my bill. I got killed on that. Right, and I do think something may have been, I don't know whether people were dragging it more. It may have been enacted at the federal... Right, so this wouldn't say you can't do it. This would say there has to be certain notice, informed consent, and advertising requirements around that. So it's already allowed. This stuff is allowing, explicitly. Right, right. So it's happening, right. So my understanding is that these are happening now. These are the same products that are being used under right to try. I don't know. So I guess the question for me is, there will be someone talking with us about FDA rules. I think Dr. Weiss will. I mean, I have talked with him, communicated with him, but just in case we don't get enough, we might be looking to you for some help. Okay. But don't overdo it. Okay. Okay. All right. So... And I think we had talked to those actually in the context of the right to try bill. Yes. Just about kind of different stages of clinical trials and that kind of stuff so I can dust off that. Okay. Anything else on that bill? So we'll look forward to Valentine's Day. Now we have something to look forward to. That's 252. Long-stemmed red roses. Right. Long-stemmed red roses. Slow-stemmed. That was really bad. Long-stem cells. Long-stem cells. That sounds like a good trick. Yeah. Okay. All right. So we'll move on to S-288. And so we're going to look at the bill that the proposal of the amendments that Jen has and then Nolan also has... I have a copy of the fiscal note. I think we should do it after we have the bill walked through because it billed slightly different but... I didn't know you wanted me to... You don't have to. We'll just hand it out when I'm ready for that. Okay. We're good. So S-288, do we have something new on that? You should, yes. Refresh your page. It's just one up. It's there. Okay. There it is. And so that's draft 1.3. Yes. All right. You know when you're ready. Almost. Turn my page. Okay. All right. Please. So this is S-288, an act relating to banning flavor tobacco products and e-liquids. This is a strike-all amendment with a lot of new language and so I've tried to identify a kind of when a whole section is new and when a section was already in there but I've made some changes to the language. So I've used bold and highlight for that. There's a lot in here because I, as I was going through the tobacco statutes, it seems like there is currently not a lot of reference to, there's a lot of reference to tobacco substitutes, which are kind of the devices for e-cigarettes but not a lot of reference to the liquids. We're putting a definition in here. I was adding it in a bunch of places but you may want to, you know, you don't have to do them. You just have to know what you're choosing to do or not do. So the first thing that I have is a finding section and this is based on findings that were, or some facts that were provided by some of the advocates. So do you want me to go through the findings? Yes. Okay. So this would have the general assembly find that first, tobacco use is costly. Vermont spends $348 million annually to treat tobacco-caused illnesses including $87.2 million each year in Medicaid expenses. This translates into a tax burden each year of $759 per Vermont household. Productivity losses add an additional $232.8 million each year. Tobacco use is growing due to e-cigarettes. 7% of Vermont high school students smoke but if e-cigarette use is included, 28% of Vermont youths use some form of tobacco product. More than one in four Vermont high school students use e-cigarettes. Use more than doubled among this age group from 12% to 26% between 2017 and 2019. More students report frequent use of e-cigarettes which indicates possible nicotine addiction. According to the 2019 Vermont Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 31% of Vermont high school students, high school e-cigarette users used e-cigarettes daily from 15% in 2017. Flavored products are fueling the epidemic. 97% of youth e-cigarette users nationally reported in 2019 that they had used a flavored tobacco product in the last month and 70% cited flavors as the reason for their use. E-cigarette and e-liquid manufacturers have marketed their products in youth-friendly flavors such as gummy bear, birthday cake, candy cane menthol, and bubble gum. Mint and menthol flavored e-cigarettes are increasing in popularity among youths. Over the past four years, mint and menthol went from being some of the least popular to being some of the most popular e-cigarette flavors among high school students. Evidence indicates that if any e-cigarette flavors remain on the market, youth will shift from one flavor to another. For example, after Juul restricted the availability of fruit, candy, and other e-cigarette flavors in retail stores in November 2018, use of mint and menthol e-cigarettes by high school users increased sharply from 42.3% reportedly using mint and menthol e-cigarettes in 2017 to 63.9% using them in 2019. It is essential that menthol cigarettes are included in a ban on flavored tobacco products, flavored e-liquids, and flavored e-cigarettes to prevent youths who became addicted to nicotine through vaping from transitioning to traditional cigarettes. Menthol creates a cooling and numbing effect that reduces the harshness of cigarette smoke and suppresses the cough reflex. These effects make menthol cigarettes more appealing to young, inexperienced smokers, and research shows that menthol cigarettes are more likely to addict youth. Youth smokers are the age group most likely to use menthol cigarettes, but are also likely to quit if menthol cigarettes are no longer available. 54% of youths 12 to 17 years of age nationwide who smoke use menthol cigarettes. Nearly 65% of young menthol smokers say they would quit smoking if menthol cigarettes were banned. Eliminating the sale of menthol tobacco products promotes health equity.  Tobacco industry documents show a concerted effort to target African Americans through specific advertising efforts. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA, agrees that menthol cigarettes harm the public health. In 2013, the FDA published a report concluding that removal of menthol cigarettes from the market would improve public health. And finally, Vermont cannot wait for the FDA to take action. The same federal legislation that was passed in 2019 banning all other flavored cigarettes allowed the FDA to regulate or ban menthol. Despite taking public comment on the dangers of menthol in 2013 and again in 2018, the FDA has still failed to act. The new policy released by the FDA on January 1st, 2020 falls far short from the dangers of smoking and nicotine addiction. The FDA's policy bans only flavored cartridge or pod-based e-cigarettes, and even then exempts those that are menthol or tobacco flavored. Open tank e-cigarettes and the flavored e-liquids used to fill them can still be sold, as can flavored, self-contained, disposable e-cigarettes. So, okay. Go ahead. On line four. You said that. Of the, of where we are on that. Yes. Okay. Four. Yeah. You said 2019. I'm sorry. It says here. 2009. I just spoke. 2009 is correct. Yes. Is correct. Yes. I'm trying to go more modern. But yes, 2009 is correct. The federal legislation that was passed in 2009 banned flavored cigarettes other than menthol, but allowed the FDA to regulate or ban menthol. Okay. Thank you for the question. Any questions on that? It's a new section. Right. It's a whole new section, so you have not seen that before. There's some a lot. Yeah, it's a lot. There's some a lot. So, my question is on the disposable e-cigarettes. There was a recent article in the New York Times indicating that disposable e-cigarettes was kind of a loophole for flavors. I mean, I don't, I wouldn't, I won't characterize it. It's not. You can't characterize it. I understand that. Yes, there is. Right. So there are, my understanding is there are three different types of e-cigarettes. There is the, the ones that use the cartridges or pods. Those are the ones that are, that the FDA is taking enforcement action to ban. If they have not received pre-market approval. And then there are open tank e-cigarettes. So that's the kind where you can go into a shop and fill it, you know, or have it filled or fill it yourself. And then there are the self-contained disposable e-cigarettes that's a one-time use and then you throw it out and those are available in flavors as well. You recycle it appropriately. You dispose of it appropriately. Right. But they are similar. I remember seeing the pictures and some examples. They're similar to the jewels. They're kind of cool. I think you have the difference between the tank things were not something you could use in school and not get caught. They're big. They're clunky. They're ugly. And they're expensive. And they're expensive and they look, yeah, like your grandmother's claw hoppers. I mean, they're, which is a different market. But the disposable ones, they look like heads dispensers. Right. And they were cute. Right. They're cute. All different colors. Okay. All right. That's that section. Right. We need to review that. We can certainly modify as the community chooses. So then we get into, I ended up just opening up all of Chapter 40 in Title VII, the tobacco products chapter. So in the definitions section, I added. Can I just ask you to introduce yourself to the committee, please? Yes, ma'am. My name is Skyler Janess. I'm the Director of Compliance and Enforcement for the Department of Liquor and Laundry. So this is, thank you for being here. I know that we reached out to you and we appreciate your presence. So we're going to be having a throw of a line to a friend from time to time. So that's very good. Thank you. You're welcome. And feel free to raise your hand at any point so we can get to your knowledge. Absolutely. Yes. And I did reach out to Mr. Janess yesterday with a couple of, but he's not seen the draft either. Okay. This is perfect. All right. All right. So the first thing is in the, I added in to make changes to the definition in the tobacco products chapter of tobacco products. And you'll see later, and this goes back to the issue we talked about last week about some sort of circularity and potential conflict in the definition of tobacco products in this chapter and the definition of other tobacco products in the tax statutes. So in trying to decouple those from each other because they don't line up well, I struck the language in the tobacco products statutes that gives kind of a catch-all for other tobacco products as defined in the tax statutes because those are both over and under inclusive of what we're referring to as tobacco products in these statutes. So I also made changes then in the definitions in the tax statutes, and I have run this by the tax department which had some helpful suggestions that I've made in here. So, you know, obviously this is the first time people or most people are seeing this, so it's possible that other changes need to be made. But I just took the language in the tax statute definition of other tobacco products and put it in here, the part that seems applicable and put it in here. So this would now say tobacco products mean cigarettes, little cigars, roll your own tobacco, snuff cigars, new smokeless tobacco, this is all current law. And instead of saying, and other tobacco products as defined in the tax statutes, it would use that, the language. And any other product manufactured from, derived from, or containing tobacco that is intended for human consumption by smoking, by chewing, or in any other manner. So that's what the tax statute says. So that's part of what the tax statute says, then the tax statute gets into e-cigarette stuff and then the tax statute says, but it doesn't include cigarettes, roll your own tobacco, snuff cigars, and new smokeless tobacco, which this one says it does. That's how they were sort of conflicting. Yes, so the tax statute says, other tobacco products means any product manufactured from, derived from, or containing tobacco that is intended for human consumption by smoking, by chewing, or in any other manner. And then it goes on to add the tobacco substitute stuff. So we're not really changing what's happening in the tax statutes for purposes of what is taxed under the tax statutes, but we are kind of decoupling them from each other. And then in the definition of e-liquid, the tax department had, I think, a helpful suggestion that the liquid itself may be, something else may be happening to it other than heating, and in order to be sure we're capturing everything you intend to be capturing, this would add some language to make the definition e-liquid means the solution, substance, or other material used in or with a tobacco substitute that is heated or otherwise acted upon to produce an aerosol, vapor, or emission to be inhaled by the user regardless of whether the liquid contains anything. I have two questions. So we've heard recently that now that there is synthetic nicotine. So it's nicotine that is produced in the laboratory and not derived from tobacco. Does this cover that? Yeah, because this says regardless of whether it contains nicotine. My other question is kind of a basic question.  What is the chemical reaction that causes the vapor to vaporize? So you're asking a lawyer that question? So just throwing it out there, because I don't know that we've had that testimony. I'd like to know how that happens. Anyway, we don't have the answers. What else is on notice? The e in the term e-liquid is short for electronic. And the electronic effect is to eat fluids. We don't use the electronics for anything else. So this is a term. You can call it anything you want. It's a term that gets used a lot. So I used it here, but I suppose it could be acted upon in a way other than heating, which is where that could be a volcanic reaction. Right? Making soda and something like that. Is there some kind of aerosol? Yeah, it could be. It could be modified. Well, maybe we want to use the word aerosol. It's right there. It's there. It's in terms of e-liquid. I think e-liquid is at this point a term of art. It came in to the jar. I mean, e-liquids are sort of overall used with e-cigarettes. We don't actually use that term statute either. We started with tobacco substitutes. We reached up with it. Okay. Alright. De-scriptive. De-scriptive. Alright. So then in the existing section, so this is new to the bill, existing section 7BSA 1002, this is the requirement to have a license, that a retailer have a license to sell various products at retail. And so I added e-liquids in here because they had not specifically been half-shered in the licensure requirement. And so we've talked, I think Senator Cummings has given an example in the past of somebody going to another state, coming back and selling these flavored products to their friends. And I said, no, because they don't even part of the issue is that they wouldn't have a license. And then I realized there isn't anything in this statute that specifically requires them to be licensed. So I added language in addition to not engaging in the retail sale of tobacco products, tobacco substitutes, or tobacco paraphernalia without a tobacco license. I added e-liquids. I didn't put them under, I didn't refer to them specifically in the tobacco substitute endorsement piece that somebody has to have. You decide with input from others whether that's appropriate. But to begin with, I thought I'd put it under the licensure requirement. And so then throughout, as we're talking about these other substances, I added e-liquid. And then similarly in subsection G, no person was allowed to engage in the retail sale of these products unless they are a licensed wholesaler or acquired them from, purchased them from a licensed wholesaler. And so in that section based on language from we've added last year, it had said substances containing nicotine or otherwise intended for use for the tobacco substitute, and I replaced that with the new e-liquids language. Then in section 1003, as we had discussed doing last week, specifically added e-liquids to the ban on selling tobacco products, tobacco substitutes, and tobacco paraphernalia to anyone under 21 years of age. So everywhere those terms were used, I added e-liquids. I also noticed that in subdivision C2A, where we have an existing exception about where items can be displayed or stored that did not include tobacco substitutes, so right now there is a requirement that someone holding a tobacco license may only display or store tobacco products or tobacco substitutes and have added or any liquid behind a sales counter or in any other area of the establishment that is inaccessible to the public or in a locked container. But then there's an exception saying it doesn't apply to a display of, and it only says tobacco products located in a commercial establishment in which by law a new person under 21 years of age is permitted to enter at any time. So it seemed appropriate to add tobacco substitutes there to be consistent with the requirement about where they can be displayed or stored, and if tobacco substitutes were added it seemed appropriate to add e-liquids. So again, these are all things you can consider whether you think there are appropriate changes. I'd like to progress the language and just so you can see what else is in here, but it didn't make any changes. Page 8, section 1004, age for the sale of tobacco products, tobacco substitutes, I added e-liquids and tobacco paraphernalia. So again, in existing law somebody has to provide proper proof of age and if they don't provide proper proof of age then the licensee is entitled to refuse to sell them and so I added e-liquids here as well. Then section 1005, persons under 21 years of age, possession of tobacco products, misrepresenting age or purchasing, it's actually now that I look at this, I think it's one thing I've been wanting to change, I believe it should be misrepresenting age four, purchasing tobacco products. I will change that while we're in here. So this is the prohibition on a person under 21 years of age possessing, purchasing or attempting to purchase these products, e-liquids, unless they are a holder of a tobacco license and are in possession of them to affect a sale in the course of employment. And this is the $25 civil penalty, so again I don't know if this would ban people, still ban people under 21 from possessing e-liquids, whether or not they are flavored. Last year you had put in or in the past we had put in tobacco substitutes, so the devices themselves, so again I've been adding e-liquids everywhere, the devices themselves were implicated, but wanted you to have an opportunity to hear from others on whether that was as intended. Posting of signs, section 1006, a person licensed under this chapter, a retailer must post in a conspicuous place, a warning sign that the sale of various products, this would add e-liquids to persons under 21 years of age is prohibited. Then on page 10, section 1007, furnishing tobacco to persons under 21 years of age in report, this again is adding a penalty to a person who sells or furnishes tobacco products, tobacco substitutes, adding e-liquids or tobacco paraphernalia to someone under 21 years of age and has the, still directs the division of liquor control to do compliance testing, there were some changes to the license suspensions last year for multiple violations, and then in subdivision three, on page 11 and looking at this, the divisions report, the division of liquor control and the department of liquor and lottery, their compliance report goes to certain committees, it's not going to this committee, so I wanted to flag that in case you wanted to add yourselves and your house counterpart right now, it goes only to the house general affairs and the senate economic development housing general affairs committee, and then I noted that the tobacco evaluation and review board last year was folded into the substance misuse prevention oversight and advisory council, so I swapped those out. You can think about whether you want this committee and the human services committee to receive this compliance testing report or just know that it's out there. Yes, I mean it is, this obviously will have to be reviewed by economic development. Well the only change to this other than the name of the council that's getting the report is adding the compliance testing and prohibition or penalty for e-liquids as well as the devices we saw. Alright, then section 109 and I labeled this with the question we keep because it had been in the earlier version but I think there had been some discussion about whether it should stay in or not and this is one of the things I reached out to the department of like remodeling about is adding, so under current law any cigarettes or other tobacco products that have been sold, offered for sale or possessed for sale in violation of section 1003 which is the sale of tobacco products to minors and some other other requirements for retailers. Anything that was sold, offered for sale or possessed for sale in violation of that statute and some other statutes throughout the green books and any commercial cigarette rolling machines possessed or used in violation of section 1011 are deemed contraband and subject to seizure by the commissioner of liquor and lottery or their agents or employees, the commissioner of taxes or employees or law enforcement officer were directed to do so by the commissioner and those items would be cigarettes I'm sorry, lost something straight through all items seized under this subsection would be destroyed so I added that this would apply not only to cigarettes and other tobacco products but tobacco substitutes e-liquids and tobacco paraphernalia so that's certainly broader than existing law but a lot of the provisions have already been added to some of those statutes and then added also section 1010 which is the internet sales provision that we worked on last year and 1013 which is the new flavor ban so some expansion in the contraband and seizure statute and there was not much testimony on this but what there was I think suggested that maybe it shouldn't stay and I think the department may have thought on whether it should be internet that I will let them speak to and you're talking specifically about 1009? Yes we'll hear from the department internet sales I added into this statute this is the one that you view the legislature and I think to some extent this committee looked at last year with respect to internet sales and mail order sales of cigarettes and tobacco products and tobacco substitutes so last year's language said substances containing nicotine or otherwise intended for use of the tobacco substitute you just struck that language and substituted or replaced it with e-liquids and then at the end of that section under violations of the section of the punishment and allowing the attorney general to impose a civil penalty I realized that in last year's language I didn't update the piece that talks about each shipment or transport of cigarettes while you're on tobacco little cigars or snuff to include tobacco substitutes e-liquids or tobacco paraphernalia constituting a separate violation so I added that language in there I skipped over section 1011 because it relates to cigarette rolling machines and wasn't relevant to what you're working on in this bill didn't seem it to me can I just ask a question so this prohibits like individual sales online but it can be sold to a wholesale right so nobody can cause these items under and this is as you enacted last year nobody can cause any of these items ordered or purchased by mail or online or by telephone or other electronic network to be shipped to anyone other than a licensed wholesaler or retail section 1012 my note here is add e-liquids I didn't make any changes in this section because I didn't want to get into changing it if you were not interested but this is an existing section of statute talking about liquid nicotine and saying basically require child resistant packaging for any liquid or gel substance containing nicotine and any nicotine liquid container and then we have definitions of child resistant packaging and nicotine liquid container this is liquid okay liquids what what is liquid nicotine it's the e-liquids that have nicotine so it's first a subset so the question it's not the patches no so my question for you on this is do you want me to revise this language to apply to all e-liquids whether or not they contain nicotine or I could use our definition of e-liquids to specify nicotine it seems like it might be a good idea to have consistent definition or consistent language throughout but I didn't want to start monkeying with it without you having an opportunity to give me some direction on whether and to what extent you want to change this so you're not banning that well you're not banning all of them you're not banning it to say alright so it's just so it would be the one the only thing left is straight tobacco yes once we get to the next section yes or no cannabis that's not a touchy enough amp and cannabis you can smoke all you want and right now I'm gonna have to tell the THD I know the bill was about that right I mean I think liquid liquid cannabis would be things that are going to be faked would be captured in the definition of e-liquid but they're not in your necessarily in your flavor you can't fake that mission smoke you what? you can't fake them unless you are doing it through you might want to look at what we're doing this because we had to accept the tax the dispensaries which vaping is the delivery system of choice for many people at the dispensary right so specifically or generally the question is on section 1012 and the question is whether or not to include what in this the question is really should I should I amend this section to use the e-liquid language and if so do you want to specific to e-liquids containing nicotine or all of them and who's going to be able to help us with this besides ourselves don't have an answer for that I think we'll be on help you know that I think it makes sense to be consistent with your terminology throughout the chapter as long as we don't lose the meaning but I think the particular policy question would be do you want this do you want child proof packaging just for substances containing nicotine or any e-liquids just e-liquids containing nicotine or all of them alright and then we have section 1013 the one we looked at last time which is really kind of why the bill you brought the bill forward in the first place and this is the ban on flavored tobacco products flavored tobacco substitutes and flavored e-liquids so it has the definitions make any changes to the definitions of characterizing flavor flavored e-liquid flavored tobacco product flavored tobacco substitute and it still prohibits the sale anyone from selling offering for sale giving, providing, transporting, manufacturing or otherwise distributing one or more flavor tobacco products flavored e-liquids or flavored tobacco substitutes I took out the language that you had asked to take out that would ban possession possession purchase or attempt purchase of flavored tobacco products flavored e-liquids flavored tobacco substitutes so could I still vape cannabis so I'm not right I'm not familiar enough with the cannabis laws but okay then if you grew it yourself I suppose I could share as a friend so okay the good question we'll also ask DLL Skyler that question as well and then you had asked to put in the same penalty provision that we have for somebody who sells to someone underage so this has a person who violates this section shall be subject to a civil penalty of not more than $100 for a first offense not more than $500 for any subsequent offense and the action would be brought in the same manner as for a traffic violation at the judicial bureau and brought within 24 hours of the occurrence and then you'll see that next section, section 3 is new it would add these violations to the judicial bureau's jurisdiction so violations of that ban relating to flavored tobacco products flavored e-liquids and flavored tobacco substitutes then I added the rest of them are kind of some farming changes adding e-liquids in places where it also seemed like they should be so the next one is an existing provision in Title 7 talking about the penalty provisions in the alcoholic beverages section or rest of the title and saying that the provisions of that penalty section don't apply to a violation of subsection 1005a relating to the purchase of tobacco products tobacco substitutes I added e-liquids or tobacco paraphernalia by a person under h21 so then in section 5 this was as I was trying to think about what where you might have unintentional exceptions remaining in the statutes under current law it is prohibited to use tobacco products and tobacco substitutes on public school grounds and public school sponsored functions so I thought perhaps it would make sense to add e-liquids here as well generally you're using them in combination with a tobacco substitute but I did see like it presented a fuller picture of the prohibition I added in the charge and creation of the substance misuse prevention oversight and advisory council this is one you worked on I think with K&E last year that folded a few different boards and councils together one of their charges has to do with looking at all substances at risk of misuse including tobacco products tobacco substitutes under current law and substances containing nicotine or that are otherwise intended for use with a tobacco substitute so I added and e-liquids and then those all get modified by that as defined in 7BSA section 1001 we're almost done then we have the tax this is the definitions for the cigarette and other tobacco tax statutes in title 32 so this is the part I was moving to earlier where I tried to clean up the definitions so this would have in the definition of other tobacco products nice in the definition of other tobacco products under existing law it's any product manufactured from or containing tobacco that is intended for human consumption by smoking by chewing or in any other manner and then it goes on to say including products sold as a tobacco substitute which themselves don't really contain tobacco and including any liquids again don't contain tobacco so I thought it's better to stop there and then say new sentence the term also includes products sold as a tobacco substitute as defined in 7BSA 1001-8 and then use the e-liquid language instead of including any liquids whether negative based or not so e-liquids as defined in 7BSA 1001-9 and delivery devices sold separately for use with a tobacco substitute or e-liquid the tax department suggested that or e-liquid part and then the existing law goes on to say but shall not include cigarettes, little cigars or your own tobacco snuff or new smokeless tobacco as defined in this section then we had that report a study and report directive to the attorney general's office by December 1 the office of the attorney general would report to various committees including this one regarding weather and to what extent Vermont may legally restrict advertising and regulate the content of labels you talked about adding last time for electronic cigarettes and other vaping related products in this state and then finally the effective date as introduced would take the bill would take effect on passage I don't know if that works for you or if you want to set it makes sense to set a date certain so there's predictability for the retailers yes I think the latter we've done that previously I think we'll just have to talk about that so there you go your short belts are going to potentially 20 pages first of all thank you so much for going through and doing this is a huge amount of work and I we appreciate it helps us think and I don't know if you know the whole committee but we're I need senior introductions earlier that's good okay that's great so a lot of this is being suggested as a new to the bill and there are there's the one specific area that's the 10-09 whether we should keep that section or not and then the rest of it so why don't we let you introduce yourself and then go ahead sure again my name is Scott I'm the Director of the Office of Compliance and Enforcement for the Vermont Department of Liquor and Watery my office does have the enforcement authority of the department to enforce all of our laws and regulations regarding tobacco products germane discussion today we also oversee alcohol and water small elements of gambling the opportunity to speak to the proposal I also appreciate Ms. Carey's work to align a lot of the definitions we operated a little bit in some nebulous areas between what the tax definition were of these products and what our Title VII definition was so we certainly appreciate the between the two codes there in regards to 10-09 right so let's find that again it's on page page 12 I didn't see okay we are on 10 10-09 Title, Chapter 10 okay and then the band and seizure so talk us through this and then suggestion I guess I do believe that the verbiage as proposed is important to amend Title VII to allow that authority particularly when we talk about abandoning a substance it becomes very challenging enforcement wise if we don't necessarily have the authority to seize those contraband products historically we've relied on the tax Title, Title 32 to because they had this linear verbiage on our authority to seize contraband so 10-09 as proposed we would be fully in support of amending that statute to include these e-liquid definitions a new definition we were luckily not faced with any of the opportunities proposed by the current statute but we did contemplate what it would mean if we were asked to seize a tobacco substitute but not necessarily seize only liquid form the Title VII definitions that it now tends to identify the device in particular and not necessarily the substances that go into the device so by adding the definition of this e-liquid it certainly extends that authority to seize that contraband should the band pass okay questions on that well I guess what happens to them once they're seized are you a commissioner? director go ahead what happens to them once they're seized they're warehouse in our evidence room 13th Green Mountain Drive on a rolling basis we destroy them by fire we incinerate them unless they're part of an ongoing criminal case when we have to retain those evidence we seize and in case it's adjudicated we destroy them any other questions do you have any comments to make on the packaging piece the child troop packaging piece which is 1012 my understanding of 1012 was always I always understood that to be a provision to protect health in terms of child access to these products I'm certainly not a doctor but my knowledge and experience has told me that nicotine in liquid form has a certain toxicity to the human body and that the child resistant packaging provisions were intended to protect public health I see no reason why the adding of the e-liquids wouldn't be pertinent to that same public health viewpoint although it is important to mention that the definition of e-liquids as proposed here would include things not including nicotine things also like CBD would potentially be included into this definition as it is baked things like THC bearing concentrates would be included and therefore would be required to have this child resistant packaging if it met that definition I'm not testifying if that's a negative I'm just trying to bring that to the attention of the public all right so we'll have to put that into our decision making is there anything else here from your perspective the only thing I would bring up is just to make the community aware my office includes 14 investigators and as I mentioned earlier we handle the regulation and oversight of both alcohol, tobacco and watery and some elements of gambling within the state I only bring this up in terms of resource management from my department this ban would certainly increase the scope and work of which my investigators do we have around 7,000 active licenses across the state which 14 investigators operate in three key programs one being a comprehensive minor compliance program where we send minors into these establishments to try and purchase underage testing the compliance with the statutes in regards to access to minors second would be a regulatory inspection model where we enter these establishments and ensure that they're compliant with all laws and regulations and third would be investigations and those would be things like complaints from the public regarding violations of law or regulation this certainly adds another layer of enforcement in terms of ensuring particularly with a flavor ban that many of these products wouldn't be on the shelves I only bring that up to say that's a little bit of a challenge for us resource-wise we found means to enforce these access laws in the past the last session passing the delivery sales ban we were fortunate to receive some grant funding from the health department to engage in some testing and compliance testing of adherence to the delivery sales ban but that is on a very small scale basis the delivery sales ban in particular is a wide universe of online retailers and these products and again 14 investigators with our mission set we are attempting to do the best we can and cover as much ground as we can we appreciate it the other question that's come up from time to time is tobacco 21 has now gone into effect for a couple of months the question is, have you seen do you have any data that shows an effect or not? I do, I'm pleased to announce and you'll see a report from my office at the end of this month which would be six months since passage our minor compliance program testing historically has shown in any six month period to show about 90% compliance meaning one out of ten compliance checks would result in the furnishing of tobacco products to a minor of last year in the passage of tobacco 21 we've seen almost 5% jump in our compliance so we are having far fewer sales of products to minors during our tobacco compliance testing since the passage of tobacco 21 wow, that's really amazing I've never seen anything more than 2% jump in any six month period and this is almost a 5% jump sorry, go ahead Senator I think retailers are sensitive to the passage of that I think they err further on the side of caution with the passage of tobacco 21 and trying to visually identify the age of the potential buyers and if they I think they are scrutinizing our minors much, much more than they had in the past sales to minors has dropped significantly but the youth risk behavior survey has shown an increase in utilization so tough I have no hard data on that but I would believe based on the surveys we've done with the health department funding for our online delivery sales ban I believe we've shifted access in a certain realm to online procurement and anything else we need to know I just commented that we have the guy in here from Brattleboro that just moved across the river so they just if he sells the tanks but there will be other ones but he's just moved across the river so it's so the sales are weaker and we have seen a decline in our number of license tobacco licenses issue year after year when I first started with the department about six years ago we were generally over a thousand license active licenses in the state I do believe the last metric I saw we just dip below nine license this okay thank you very much for being here after working with us I'm sure that well it's possible that you'll be going into economic development to look at this with them so thank you and if anything else comes up that you think we should know about please don't hesitate to communicate with us send Doria note Jenna note and we'll try to work together thank you it's nice to meet you


Hey everyone, I'm Brian Sakawa and welcome to the first episode of Ask Keyspoke Style. This is a series that I've wanted to do for a while because you guys write in with so many questions, so let's just dive right in. The first question I want to answer is one that's probably asked the most frequently and that is, how do you style your hair? What's the process? What kind of products do you use? So I'm going to walk you through it.  I don't want it to be totally dry. I just want to leave it a little bit damp. The next step is to start getting the part happening on the side of my hair and with a haircut like this where it's very short on the side and pretty long on the top, it pretty much takes care of itself. I don't have to do much, just move my hair over a little bit and the part's pretty much there. The next step is to start working some product through my hair. I really like to use Brill Cream. It's a pretty old school product but it works. I like it because it's got a pretty good hold and it leaves my hair pretty manageable. I can still run my hands through it. I don't like to have my hair kind of matted or too hard. Next I take my comb and make it all neat and nice and just a little bit over on the side there. Now at this point you could be done. For me, I don't like to have all these little comb lines in my hair so the last step for me is to just take my hands and run it through my hair so it looks a little bit more natural. And there you have it. If you have any questions, please send them along. You can email me at brian at espokestyle.com or submit them via Twitter or Instagram using the hashtag AskHSS. That's all for this time. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. What should I start or stop? This is harder than I thought. You're doing fine. It's so easy when I did it to myself in the car.


Save 10% with my code BOBBY10 on raw, organic, grass-fed and grass-finished, freeze-dried organ meats from grassland nutrition. Link in the description box. All right, guys. Welcome back to the channel. If you're new, my name is Bobby Guy. Since I started doing reaction videos on Islam, you guys told me I will have to react to Dr. Zucker Knight. However, now, guys, I'm traveling, as you can see in the background, a beautiful kitchen for you guys to observe. Unfortunately, obviously, I cannot bring my green screen with me. So therefore, this format will have to do for the following three to five videos before I settle again. And then we are back to my professional, quote unquote, green screen studio. All right, with no further ado today, as I said, we're going to react to Dr. Zucker Knight with his video, Why Did Not God Create Only One Religion? Let's have a look. My name is Krishna Rao. I'm working as a general manager abroad. Luckily today, one of my, fortunately, I've come here with one of my friends who has brought me here today. In fact, Dr. Zucker, I've seen him on TV. And always I had, I mean, this is a great opportunity that has, God has given me to see him personally. Okay. He believes in God.  Are Christian. That why God didn't create. I was prejudiced there. I thought because of his name, he will be Indian, but apparently he's Christian. He didn't create one religion or he didn't make one religion for everybody so that peace would have been prevailed on this earth. He knew it, or he never knew. I already know the answer because I read the Quran, the Quran states that if God willed it, we all would have the same religion, but he willed it otherwise. About it, that these are the problems which are going to be faced. The brother asked a very good question, very important question. Why did not God create only one religion? Why did he create all the different religions so there would have been no confusion, no fighting? And I agree with him. It's a very good question. But that's the beauty of life, isn't it, that we are so different and we can get to know each other? That's what the Quran states as well. If you read the Quran, Allah says in the Quran, in Sulla Nimran, chapter 3, verse 19, in Nadina in the Laila Islam, the only religion acceptable in the sight of Allah as Islam, Islam means submitting a will to Almighty God. So if you read all the religions, Almighty God only sent messengers to preach one religion.  And it's mentioned in the Quran in Sura-e-Fatir, chapter 35, verse 24. I didn't know that it was that many. Nazir, there is not a nation or a tribe whom we have not sent a warner or a guide. Allah says in Sura-e-Rod, chapter number 30, verse number 7, holy, holy, common heart and to every people have we sent a warner. Now all the messengers that came brother, they taught nothing but submitting the will to Almighty God. And the basic. I absolutely agree with this. Message that all these messengers taught oneness of God. 100%. It did not begin. He has got no mother. He has got no father. He's only one. There's nothing like him. But due to passage of time, all what the messengers preached, it got corrupted. And if you heard my talk, I mentioned that most of the scriptures that came before the Quran, they got changed. Sure. And Allah says in the Quran, in several places, if he wanted, he could have made everyone submit his will to God. Everyone Muslim. See Muslim brother, don't take it as a religion. The real meaning of Islam is, it's a deen. It's a way of life. Submitting your will to God. And Muslim doesn't mean a person who has the name Zaki, Abdullah Sultan. Muslim means a person who submits his will to God. If you submit your will to God in Arabic, I will call you as Muslim. So don't go on the labels given. There was quite surprising to me, believe it or not, when I found out that Muslim simply means someone that submits his will to God. A believer in other words, simply in Arabic. That was of course shocking to me because for me, Muslim was simply a religious affiliation like Buddhist, Christian or Jew. Muslim in Arabic means a person who submits his will to God. Anyone who submits his will to God, he's called as a Muslim. So all the messengers that came, they taught that we have to submit our will to God. All of them taught monotheism. All taught Tauheed. But by the passage of time, all these scriptures kept on changing. And that's the reason Almighty God, He sent the last and final messenger, Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. And the last and final revelation, Glorious Konan. Now all the messengers that came before... It's really congruent and makes sense if you think about it that way. It is a very red threat underlying the whole story, the whole conceptualization of what Islam is. Essentially the description for me is so beautiful because it states it is not a new religion in a sense, but rather we're trying to find the underlying message which is the monotheism, which is the submission to God, which then of course means that all the prophets preach the same thing. It is linear, it is congruent. Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. This is why it rationally makes sense. All the revelation that came before the Qur'an, they were only meant for those people and for that time. By name, Fora mentioned in the Qur'an. Torah, Zabur, Injil and the Qur'an. Torah is Zawahi, the revelation which was given to Moses, Zabur is Zawahi, the revelation given to David, peace be upon him. Injil is Zawahi, the revelation given to Jesus, peace be upon him. And Qur'an is the last and final revelation given to the last and final messenger, Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. But Qur'an also says in Surah chapter number 13 verse number 38, it says in every age have we sent a revelation. There were several revelations sent down, but all the messengers that came before Prophet Muhammad, they were sent only for those people and for that time. That is the reason Almighty God did not think it fit to preserve it. But since Qur'an is the last and final revelation, not only sent for the Muslims or the Arabs, it is sent for the whole of humanity. And Prophet Muhammad, he is not sent only for the Muslims or the Arabs, he has been sent for the whole of humanity. That is the reason he has been prophesied in all the major religious scriptures. And this book, the Qur'an, Allah says in Surah Hijjah chapter number 15 verse number 9, we have revealed the Qur'an and we shall guard it from corruption. So what we realize is that Almighty God sent messengers to preach only one religion. That is submitting your will to Almighty God. In Arabic, I say Islam. Makes total sense. Absolutely. Because even if you look into the Bible when Jesus is asked how to pray, he speaks of the Father's prayer. Jesus called God the Father within the biblical context. But more importantly, what is the Father's prayer? You can clearly read, Thy will be done, which is of course the absolute submission to God aka Islam in Arabic. Christianity. The word Christianity doesn't exist in the Bible. Do you know that? That's true. In the full Bible, the word Christianity is not there. Of course not. In which Christianity? The word Christianity. No, it wouldn't make sense because then Jesus as the Messiah, the Christ, Christ meaning Messiah, he would then have to preach a religion in a remake that would be called messianism, essentially named after him. But that obviously wasn't his teaching. Christian was a nickname given to the followers of Jesus and Antioch mentioned the book of Acts. It is as if the Muslims nowadays would be called Mohammed Danists, basically. So Jesus Christ preached Islam. It's mentioned in the Gospel of John chapter 5 of summer 30. Jesus Christ said that not my will but my Father's will. Thy will be done. God's will. In Arabic, he preached nothing but Islam. Fair enough. Similarly, if we read Bhagavad Gita, she Christian said that you have to submit your will to God. If you haven't said Arabic, he says that you have to accept Islam. What we realize that all the messengers taught nothing but submitting a will to God. That is the reason the Quran says in the Sola and Imran chapter 3 verse 19, in Nadina in the Lail Islam, the only way of life accepted in the sight of God is submitting a will to Almighty God. What we have to go back to the original scriptures, go back to the commandment of Almighty God and submit your will to the commandment of God and then you will be following the straight path. Hope that answers the question. Beautiful. Alright guys and this is it for today's video. This is it for the first reaction video to Dr. Zakir Naik. I'm very impressed with his performance. Absolutely beautifully put. Many new things but many things that I already knew through reading the Quran, through learning about Islam. Guys, now you're surely wondering yet again, why are you not converting? Why are you not reverting? Bobby, we are waiting. I talked about this before. The submission to God is crystal clear to me. The monotheism is crystal clear to me. That's our heat. I absolutely resonate with it. Moreover, I would even claim that I internally know that that is the truth. The submission to God is the truth. The monotheism is the truth. I would absolutely agree with those statements. However, why I'm further learning is because there are certain rule sets that are differing within the religions. For example, the Jews have to keep the Sabbath. The Muslims do not have to do that. The Muslims fast on Ramadan and that fast is different from the Orthodox Christian fast. For example, the Christians, they're abstaining from the flesh. However, the Muslims, they don't eat and don't drink throughout the day. The Jews, on the other hand, fast differently yet again. So the core message of Islam, I said it many, many times before, is absolutely beautiful. And I agree with it 100%. However, if we get into the technicalities, and I spoke about this as well before, the Shiites, they differ with the Sunnis. They are different technicalities. Some schools of thought say that dogs are haram, for example, or music is absolutely haram. Then you have other schools of thought as well. And as I said, Christians, on the other hand, won't tell you that music is haram. So I'm trying to find the red thread here. I'm trying to understand what is really from God and what is added. I absolutely believe yet again that the Quran is preserved, but I have my skepticism when it comes down to the hadiths. All of this and more I have to learn about before I can accept a new religion. All right, guys, but this is it for today's video out of my kitchen here. I hope you liked it. Nevertheless, if so, leave it a thumbs up if you haven't subscribed already. Guys, please do so. And if you want to support this channel, support my work, all the links are in the description box below. Patreon as well. All right, guys, this is it. As always, may God bless you all. Much love and peace.


मेई पहाली बागा हैं। मेरे कुछह सी ऱा मुझे जाज़ कुछह सदीस को आपली वी व्गाद करतें वो पहरे लगा कचा करतेखा आपली खेर, तुम देखा हम ने तुब बोला था आम जुस रीटिएं इंटुसर कुई ये आप्रा काम है हम मीटिया में जब किसी से कोट लेते हैं आजकी दुनिया आसी होगी कि जी जो भी बोल रहा आदमी चाप्तो बर हम पहले आनलैस करते दे कुम बोल रहा आसी है किसे बोल?在年 2015 , Government last two , only one foreign player with Indian midfield. I don't think if that is fair . As Re importance said, sometimes coaches do have strategy . They say something in media that my coach have been there for some time. They clearly mentioned completely , does not treat the situation with other coaches. प्रवड़़्य कै जवाद़ मझर सवाशनतवात्यदाया में बाच्यों आप तवाव्नाज़ोंस जवाद़ में थान्यऔ, अगनी तवाशण्वाश। आप दीए करई ब चजी अग़ी मुठोल है। जीकोगी वेगोंगे बागी तुछीग. इसा अगरा आपा वो तॉछीग वही आप है. अगरा आपा कोचुा, यह तॉगीह हो गरा एक. आप वो मोग आपी अ पर वेग पाद में आपजग of the game that i have played अप दईसा, यह क simultaneous footballer me and qualifying for deficient cup. ymm ný নజజజ���ন গেোযোযাসূঋন বসা তি�us তিযেচাযোযে. तो तुविज्यागे घूग्यां कोलने दरँ मेंने गानात। नहीं थो पर मुधिया के तेवागे वीज़ात् में सब यहान भादर्यानी वो थ inevitable? जब को मैं तो देधां लि काना वीतत की रफ्याट अचा में एक कचा तो, मु Этот आपन्तिन्तिःती त 2015 जीो करबी शा� SPEAK Size कोई शीा थे टीारे सार्ऴा观दगा आपने तेंती यमार, so because I feel from my point of view. करबी लीजी कयो करकबीला त्ता है औत यह मीशा ऻाे जीे का Israel and Iraq, मैं wäre वो ग़ा सोकी लाँ सुन का फ्रूद नाउछ करम्डी के वो लोगे वो वो वाई नहींंगे क्ता। तो भो आगी गिल हमी है. जर आप भो वो आप सब वो आपकведे आप सब ऐगुम कोगे वो, So for us, these people do motivate us, & there is no complaint that. We are always there, of course Rezhygol is our karabha. But then we just keep going & that's how it was. & now the new generation's things have changed so much... ...so much social media, so much supporters expecting a lot. So now these things are then to manage it's not easy. For a coach I think it's easy just to concentrate and not talk too much before the match. तश्वरीम,emptown India, was the former chief election commissioner, who was the India sports minister. I forget his name. He was giving away his prizes for some 60's and 50's players, in a function in the Indian International Center, where he said these players played in Olympic and they were great players. And currently a lot of players, he spoke about big players in the 2009 Indian football. णल कि अदर तंनगाया बाज़ा से नहीं from a few years ago what you say school team something like that shocking what he said, and three days later on a week later bobbin and held a press conference in at the football house in Delhi and in the big department minister.  तो सेप की हिसाप से तो it was a 532 that morphs into a 352 when they go into attack. तो नहीं ख़ब लेक, यह करे रहें नहीं आसी रहलाग लोग, तु सान वागत गडिल गर लिक नहीं भूभ वो भागत. ब्रदा, to be the low block, for me, you need great individual quality players, if you can sign 5 meshes, meshes is the best person to be the low block, because he can take on the players, you have to take on the players, right? ब्रदा, what I'm scared about this last time we have seen after playing so well against Qatar, after Qatar when we played against Bangladesh, Bangladesh played low block, and we were lucky to play 1-1. ब्रदा, now do we have that, of course, I'm not in Cambodia, Richard have done some research on that, but I have not seen for a long time, we have played against them, but 10-15 years back, where we scored 7-0, but it's not going to be the same, but if they stay low block, I don't know, it will be a difficult one, I'm scared about India, we need great quality players, ब्रदा, now we have some good quality players, the way we have played friendly is, we all have played with the better teams, so now we are playing with a low rank team, it will not be easy, but one goal can change the thing though, if against Cambodia, if you can score 1 first, then the gate will open, otherwise first half, if you don't score, it's going to be a tough one, yes? आपके 11 देखादेंगे बारी, then everyone scored 11 today. आप इनाफ कंपलेट, the 11, and then if you can just take us through the 11, why you've got who, where and what you're expecting them to do, considering we're playing a low block now versus Cambodia. आप प्रदिज़़, yes, भडे ब्रदेज़े मैं आप, क्या बाते, आगे जी 11. अनशाखा, घिहठふःु, छाछतेन, तेंजछ वहाँ सछरी, गगे मैं राइ� 신�ात, करिऐर Award,first press, उरेश, बंध testimन trust, भे विसि लेपा लेग, आप विया के लझाछते जो, उसी अपभी वो रगा है, तहापा, साहाल, मनभिल, लिसoningेल हुद gold. गररती देर्याब अलèleक्च statute welcome. कि挺 कली छिल क panelists who can move the ball quick. Because we are going to play India have. असी अभी आप यहाली More. हमोग अनीग आप के लावणे Sayspielग प्र अगी खड़ा दर की जर्द करना का ज़ाते है. खड terrifying प nectar शफैजival शफेज事 दिन शब्या करच की में फ़ख की खडफार இரूच मैज़ loos because from炸ार Daw थ्iencia म्लेश द acordo प्रा मेambre में अरी च्या। त्या सोरley तेमाँ ौर कि तेसी ब곡 उसौतípशै कर ढ़ाते which and मट्टों काना ज़ादी लिस्ट के ज़ादी में ज़ादी में जादी कोआ कीता. वंकिवाघ साड़ी वासकों बोज़ा गरी शवीगी कर वि बागता है. रहा है रहा है कोगो खुसा आचा थे में रहा है। आपना वीश्पट्या क्या मट्टाले तो बच्छफात है. अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अगर अ� if i want to bring anyone i will bring grosson on the right side because he can play right side also yes two footed player richard okay fine understood richard what about you bhai your internet was gone but you are back with us hail and hearty any is your team around the same same same lines is it coming on the screen it is coming it is called producing as you said it is coming timing is right no i didn't know that bake is not available so probably suresh based on how he is performed in those in that position for both club and last time india played i think world cup qualifiers in the end he was putting it in right back so i think that will be the replacement the only consideration over here is that jingan kotaal and tangri behind balance will sit and the rest along with them they commit to the attack because against the formation of the low block nothing to take I think wherever the ball is you need to have more numbers in and around the ball to continue keeping possession to break down lines or the patients who spoke before ishwak that you need guys over there who can continue keeping the ball and you need to keep knocking at the door constantly so that you need numbers you need to commit a high amount of numbers up front and look at cambodia especially for the first game they leave only two up front that is what i said it is a five three and two but two just waiting for the counter attack so according to that i think if jingan kotaal and tangri stay back and the remaining bake is available or even suresh with both going and providing with and everybody else just crowding around and trying to combine and break them down that is the thinking behind this this individual quality is not going to be seen so much in the final third because there will be a crowd so according to that set piece dependency i think a little bit of individual play and things but if at all the block works the way it did against the team then it is going to be really tough team to break down but again an early goal all of those things can change the whole script so we need to commit big numbers up front to the attack and try and break down their low block so it will be eight versus seven if we look at their art with us tangri is an interesting choice because he keeps himself busy in that position you can put an attacker he can come up and help an attack as well it is nice to see that boy in your team i am just thinking because one you are looking for individual brilliance to open up a low block you cut one and then the whole world opens up that is the way it works but this changing this switch this switching of direction like rani bhai was saying you got to go right or left or right and keep on doing it till the time you find that opening that is not our style we have not done that much yet we don't sort of show that sort of control even if we are playing against a lower ankle we are still playing them lower and hoping for someone to open up a team going forward for that a ball distribution speed also has to be ridiculously quick a big long switch as opposed to sending the ball left or right in two or three passes at a lightning speed we need those qualities also as long as the ball is in there they will organize where the ball lands so far what they have said the switch is the least effective pass in the final third if the low block is sitting just to shift across and settle up against them again you need to go across it works against teams that have a little bit of attacking instinct but I think even steam arch in one of the comments has anticipated that Cambodia is going to come for a draw they aren't keen on maybe winning against us and maybe containing us so in terms of that tactical considerations technical quality to see through the tactics over there we might see some obvious gaps but as I said they need to win low block we have struggled against asheelank also not too long ago we have seen that come up against us and the best quality of low block is that the keepers also tend to stand out because in that gap the keeper has a much better chance of anticipating where the shot is going to go because the margin to even get a shot of reduces a lot the keeper can predict the player a lot more than he would in an expansive team so I don't think this is going to work one is that we have to beat them but after that we have to defeat them we will take any kind of considerations I think the emphasis from everyone is that you have got to go up in attack and you really need to really don't think about leaving them behind go ahead and score jaydeep sir your team are you along the same lines or are you a little different? they are different so they have analysed it very well but actually when you asked me to find a team I didn't I didn't really think about it I just put it like that because you are playing from what I can see you are playing a 5-3 too yeah because he generally plays with a defensive mindset maybe against Cambodia he will do differently maybe but I find him very unpredictable first of all I find him very unpredictable so it becomes very difficult for me to because he changes it so many times atleast I failed to keep up with his thoughts you may have some very well planned things in his mind which I failed to anticipate frankly speaking and secondly I can't believe that we are thrashing our head so much for a lineup against Cambodia sir welcome to reality so I think the streamer can pick up his best stream in this and can win this match straight away there is no point thinking about so many things we are not playing UAE or we are not playing Japan hello I am saying if Thailand would also be there then I would have accepted it Cambodia I will think so much about it I don't know now this is the news which is called Hindi hello I have nothing against Cambodia there must be a far improved team or whatever but I think first match 3 points should be in our pocket let's go sir you will see you have to believe that this coach is unpredictable no player knows that the one who is going to win the debut he will win the debut suddenly which is possible we don't have any problem we have played any team but we win we are saying if we win the first match if we win the first match if we get good confidence then 3 points would be in the bag so I am sure if we win the first match next match you will see a more confident team coming into the ground this is the team you have to get rid of this who do you have to get rid of this who do in the first game no one believes you can score as Richard has already done they will be like that they will say but I still believe I still believe what Rennedy bhai said I think we have enough doesn't matter which team has played even the new player who is like Roshan Akash all these young guys I still believe that we have the arsenal Rennedy bhai you have got a leave before you leave Rennedy bhai you have kept your hand on your heart you have not said anything other than the truth it is an easy matter because we are going to meet after the match so on our face we played last versus Bangladesh and then it happened Bangladesh is a better opponent than Cambodia certainly so I am not too worried about Cambodia but I am worried about Hong Kong and Afghan which is not going to be easy so Cambodia we will win and we should win but Afghan and Hong Kong it is not going to be easy so I am little worried about that but first match I am not worried at all I think we should win and we will Rennedy bhai look forward to having all three games where we will be going live after the final Rennedy bhai thank you for joining us if you could just hang around for a bit because needless playing 11 we will be playing with you first of all my bhai show your playing 11 and unmute yourself your mute brother your mute yes yes so the team is more or less the same I think the guys are getting angry about why and our experts are picking you know guys like Sovarshi's boss and Pitham Kota without understanding that the coach has picked these players in his squad so we are restricted to only those two players to choose from no I have scored 5 goals put them in the team there are other boys who you can call but tell me you have put Roshan on the right both put it and dead ball doing well he is also a player that looks pretty confident he doesn't look over-odd by the occasion playing international football seems to have put it in quite well with all of that and a good league as well so I would start him I am again looking at it from the same perspective that Cambodia by everything we have heard and seen little bit we will sit back and play on the counter so we won't need to keep too many players you know in our own half defending all the time so I think Bose and Jingan do that job very well and Bose also has he can switch in case of injury etc etc he can be moved to an out wide spot we have replacements to come in in case any of that happens so plus I think in terms of a second centre back from what I have seen he has been the most composed and calm of the defenders that we have in the squad and he is not too good at getting back from attacking positions so when he does go forward although he puts in good balls I don't think he has the ability to get back that well and so we often get caught out on that kind of counter situation so him playing in the centre left kind of situation he can cover for the rest of the team to move forward with maybe Gland Martins acting as a link between the defence and the midfield and then the rest are all out attacking players Manveer on the right Ashik on the left Brandon in the middle he has taken the most goals yes but I don't know just because I was looking at someone to play in that centre attacking midfield so I think Brandon does that a little bit better but they can also I mean we will be using our substitutes it's going to be hot and humid in Calcutta so players have the chance to make an impact from the bench as well it's not that these 11 will play the next three games also I don't know whether we are looking at this as just the preview to Cambodia I thought we are making our next 11 for the entire three games just for Cambodia then I think we have a little bit more room to play around so you start with an all out attacking and hopefully we get a couple of goals and then we are you know the trade is rolling no brother you have played two very fast cheetahs on your fullback and then our cheetahs hopefully we will be able to play something I will show you the last 11 there is not much difference there is no 4-1-4-1 because he is following the streamer's trend you can see your 11 it's a message I know the boys have scored a goal against Jordan the debut wasn't the greatest of the debuts but just remember also the first game and playing against the opposition and that the whole team was sitting back they couldn't do anything against Jordan despite what the coach might have been saying also if you are talking low block I feel that 1-2-3 Roshan Suresh Glan and going forward everyone because they did this mistake in Calcutta against Bangladesh so your two center midfielders your fullback is everyone is asking for a ball because there is space there you all go ahead Sandesh Anwar will be your center midfielders because they are going to have space they will have space on the ball and Anwar has that ability of playing a nice long ball to the left Sandesh not so much but Sandesh is there because Sandesh is really good as a defender Roshan on the left I know Akash Mishra is really good but Roshan from whatever you seen in that small glimpse of him he gives you that unlocking you know he can unlock the defense he can unlock the player who he is playing against so he gives you that so for that reason he is there Suresh I agree with the entity he has been halfing on about this boy playing a fullback because not only does he labor a lot he also gives you a lot going forward so he will give you that in this game going forward I like Glan Martins like Satant he should be there in the middle because Sandesh and Anwar you cannot leave him alone as per me whatever defense you have seen you cannot leave him alone because he should be there because he will not be there because he will be in Kolkata so you have kept Glan there and in front of him Sahel I like Sahel because he is the in form player not because Sahel comes in with that name he is the in form player the boy has been scoring goals the boy has been influential for Kerala getting to where they did in that season so Sahel must be there Yasir for me joins him not Brandon not Thapa Thapa looked off base completely versus Jordan Thapa of course makes good runs Thapa likes unlocking defenses by going into different spaces but in a low block you will not get the time or space to do that so in that you want someone who is good on the ball who has that little bit of he is in Yasir's feet he can find that person and he has that thought on the right he will be listening which is often played on the left he is the right footed player so play him on the right because on the left your lover will play and you can switch the both players they are used to playing right left left right right left left right so that's a good way and both give you goal scoring threat and up front jee amare hai Shilajit ke sponsor amare saar jo abhi bhi chal rahe strong at the age of 37 God bless him touch word Sunil Chhetri but jee yeh apni team hai to agar aap me se kisi ko sabah leh iss ke baare me mir se push liye je nahi to main show ko ab wrap up karne ke samai pe leh ke you can take a few questions if you want people are getting a bit excited about wanting to ask questions that's one and meanwhile everyone is agreeing on the chat pundit that everyone is saying on the chat that teri team jee jee deko bhai main chat deke team naatao i think your audio oh i have muted sorry yes sir you muted me i have seen your muted the video nahi but i am saying before i will tell you what Richard Ishwak we will let you go now because we have a little ticketing matter to talk about we will talk about the prevents you lies lead Ishwak sir batao jee aak bandh kar ke avasi lete bhai jee jeed ke India paunch ke India-China easy peasy i think this group they should be definitely the winner of this group even if they kahi pe fumble bhi hota draw bhi hota but i still believe they should be mazade wala sir you are not caring about maza aayega nahi aayega you just want i am not really i think this this is this is how to reach to China China me to nahi aur aayega shayadab in China me nahi aur aayega sorry jahaan bhi ho ba jahaan bhi ho ba i feel that is important now pocho bhai sir maza to sir jee sir maza to sir jee sir maze aane wala insha Allah insha Allah insha Allah bhai gaj aap ka internet this is good this is good real maize to udhar hi pata chalega kya kaila nahi aayega very good after this harshe baad indistan ki team ko dekhne ho milega in the flesh on the ground if the boys don't reach then we will say panauti if the boys don't reach then the whole system will be completely destroyed if the boys don't reach then the whole system will be destroyed if something goes wrong but this is also good this is also good if coach sir in press conference after coming and saying that the girls don't reach then we will agree by the way this should be said jadeep sir it's been a revelation bhai ko accreditation mili bhai jaare press conference to do and he will talk to the coach first there are changes I can promise you there will be more changes now he hasn't come in my hand I don't know I'm going in the train I was going to go from the road from the road Richard bhai Richard bhai just before before Richard Richard anything you want to add bhai final comments what are you expecting bro and put on your coaching hat is it as easy as you are making it sound or looks it should be first goal first goal first goal first match get the 3 points in I think that's what the agenda should be we are tactics we are tactics formation in this it's not going to be a factor because after many years we are playing with them Afghanistan will get to watch them at the stadium Hong Kong too will get to see them twice before we face them but this is the first match we have to go all guns blazing like there is no need to mince words and look at it from a pragmatic point of view realistic idealistic win take this out then the rest should fall into place so there is not so much to look into means straight forward much love much love to Richard much love to Ishwak for taking our time I just want to say it Renédy bhai much love to him as well we will be going live after every game 3 games as soon as the final whistle plays till then Cambodia will start here you have to come to our channel because we are going to talk and our yes sir before we leave bhai someone is saying how many questions he has asked once but he has asked 50 times that is the only question bhai in the log let me tell you coaching point in the log 3rd man run is the most important 3rd man run 3rd man run even if the 3rd man run is correct what is the 3rd man run what is the 3rd man run first I am Anurag Anurag Kaustik yes he is the most important 3rd man run is the most important 3rd man run is the most important 3rd man run is one of the best team for 3rd man run is men's team where from midfield many players from behind if you keep playing from one side the player goes from midfield and he runs he crosses one on one you get a goal whatever that is what 3rd man run 3rd man run is usually not getting detected by defense his name is 3rd man run 3rd man run does thapa specialize in this thapa hem it does he does it does so does distan fights when block is below that is one of the best but if you cross you don't get much space you must get one-touch finish He said he takes ॐ। ॐ। ॑। ॑। ॑। ॑। ॑।phenis will be distributed. And how, this is only about the first semester. Remind you, it is about the Cambodia match. But the funny part of it is that, that is the biggest funny part of the entire episode, the ARF, it is the All India football Federation, will still end up spending 8-12 lakhs for this match, आत में लिए दोगा, लिए दोगा, भी दोगा, दोगा, वे दोगा। आप दोगा भिहाती, गज़े दोगा और वग भीदी हैं। और वेगगे, देखिया पद्ःहाता हो ओगा, दोगा हमने यहे नहीं को लगी तो अगय चा�ka तो अपने AFF will end up paying, say, 12 lakhs also, I think तो से थाथ is saying, he is absolutely right, it is downright poor planning वहातनों तो � blind shows, that the erstwhile committee of some of whom is still working here अभो द़ेवन्गे ना, वहाँ तो the bad words about them �瓜ल आता की �핑्तेरा. आपको आपको एक साल दो साल होगे आय. एक पहडी �知 तौणवाच्ः मेग स की बहुत आप कुडवानी किच्तनों के इं… अपनी या च 먹어�ंगे बहुत भी होगे न अस配 ज़ मै चेखो अचम के पासूअ ��요 बपिससा थदी शाहतے experienced blogs. । । । ।। अगर कोई बोल्रा है, अरगनाईजन भोल्रा आड़ पन्ड़ाजा से आपनी जागा नी आगा. तिर आप ख्या गर रहे दे बडखे. जिस्के बारे में बाद करना पते है, अनी भाई कप चारे ना, बड़ाईए जरा the our youngsters क्या कररे वहाँपे, कप पटक होँगे वहाँपे. ये दिखेजी, हैच्टाएक चला दिया है. और क्या अप सवाल करेंगे? सवाल करेंगे साब से, अरगनोजन लगन. या जब हाड आएगा हाथ में के पता चलेगे आच्सेस है,ं तब शौर के लुस हो और देखे एंगे होगAPM, when partners will have access to the stadium and press conference, then it will be announced. दिया नहीं ख़िल के बाद लेए नहींगे नहींगे आप दोजें नहींगे रह्ँद लेए नहींगे जुस के रिज़्ंग के लिए. तो अहाँ वोगते रोग बईलतानी तु्रिकिख़, और भाश के णोंगे तुब लेए, मेरें रिकि का ज़गिल करी कि अगर, आख्फिर कोई टँख़् आप, आप लोग रे आश्वाग. अपको ये के लगा कि लगा कि हम तखर हैं या वंपसर हैं गुई भोलने को नहीं या। वर जब सब लोग जिन लोग को आप सुन चाते हैं वुसब आई हैं तु फिर कैसे लूं यार अंड़ास टार पुक्ष विब अलै दी गोन डेड गंटे के शुओ कर लिया अम ने अज़्ानि का मुक्ः मिले, तो टोडा मुजे समें देगी जगा? अगर आप किले तो भेट करेंगे, दाइ गंट्या शोना देगा पर नब तो लगे. आप शाडे धस बजे में करोगे, याज्ची पारोगे? करेंगे Kirenge � asleep तो वहने के तम्राव चाए थावाध्या खब नहींगज़ेंगा और च़ल ःल तहींजा जावाधिया था वहने वेगर श़ेवादा चाजँ़दर लेगा करनाजि वाग्टीग,