Hey folks, welcome on back. Good morning, and might I say once again, hey, I hope everybody had a very merry Christmas this past weekend, and obviously yesterday, here this Tuesday morning, December 26th. Shortly after 9 a.m. Eastern, of course, you could tell this is not Fausto. Once again, Josh Taggan, and he's off today. We'll be back tomorrow, but with that said, great to see Michael, Chuck, Brian, Tiago, John, Alex, Brad, Mark, Charles, Linda, and all of us otherwise. Now, hey, really quick, and actually, let me pop up on webcam for all of us in our trading room. Should be good to go across the board right now, as well as all of us on social media, Facebook, Live LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube, et cetera. We got a full house today. I love to see that as an instructor, as someone who runs the trading room alongside Fausto day to day. That's great to see, love the camaraderie. Great to see Leo here, and Leda as always, and Grant, Margaret. This week, though, we're not really expecting too much. We're expecting kind of a slower week. Things to really dry up early in the morning, not expecting that big push as much, at least afterwards, expect the pullbacks and, like we always say, take the money and run, right? Now, that's easy for us to all agree on right now, but since we have so many of us here this morning, I think the reason why so many of us are here is because we love doing this. We love trading, and we love being here on a day-to-day basis. It's not just the camaraderie and the chit chat going on in the room, but hey, it's the fact that we can make some money, right? There's at least a chance, right? Well, don't try and get too greedy out there today. This is the type of day where definitely you want to be more conservative with taking profits. I just came off a small loss this morning on the SXTP. We'll get to that in just a bit, but ARBB, this is kind of the same deal. Popped up before seven o'clock, made a small little bounce going into eight, but then never ended up continuing to make that push higher, right?  Hey, don't get me wrong. On the optimistic side of things, obviously, I don't want to sound too pessimistic as a trader. This past month, we've done so well on all these trades. C4, the PO, L trade from this past week, we had the NXTP just from this past Friday. That was up like 158% at one point or so. So a big push, actually up at home a lot more, actually, but hey, they could always come by. That's why you want to be in our room. At least so you have the chance to see the call out, watch myself, Rich Faustonis here. We're navigating the ship for you, and we're gonna make call outs based off not just a stock popping, but if it has good volume, then we'll definitely be more keen to follow up on that call out. If it has a crazy spread, there was just one before the IINN, right? Hey, that was the first thing I said this morning on this trade. It popped up pretty strong to begin, but it had very thin volume out there and a much wider, more fluctuating spread than what you see here. It's actually filled in a little bit, but not too much so. Oh, nice little, I saw about 15K there. 15K on the bid, right there, 244. All right, so that's at least a decent order out there on level three on the trade station matrix. Let's actually see if you could have that pop up on Nasdaq Book View. Whoa, take a look at this. So I filtered out my Book Viewer before this meeting started. We're looking to show and provide education on the Nasdaq Book Viewer a lot more going forward. Actually, you stay tuned. Faustonis is gonna be doing nice mini series on that throughout this week, I believe. So, hey, that iceberg order 245, it's not through the Nasdaq because it would show right here. Maybe it's through the EDGX, ECN, the ARCA Book, whatever it may be at the time, but where my eyes are right now, look at this. This is definitely popping up. We got a $2.70 cents, 176,000 shares popping up, right there, a 270. And it's likely to be like one major order out there creating that. It's only two people actually in full. So, yeah, I mean, for right now, that's where you even more so have to be careful heading into the open for this one trade, the IINN. There is some news attached to this at least, so I'm gonna just repost the news, or Rich, if you wanna give me a favor and just blast that news again in the chat. I know that you did before. So I'll read it from above though. He said that IINN moving higher after the company announced 95% accuracy results for their blood sensors. They're planning FDA submission for clearance in 2024.  But with this iceberg order popping up here afterwards, definitely providing a new brick wall of, like a steel wall of resistance right there. So, yeah, I'll add this to our watch list. We'll see if that order gets pulled or maybe later on, if there's a chance it can get broken through, that'd be nice to say. Ooh, Linda, nice catch on the IINN. She got in at $213, selling at three bucks. Beautiful off the initial pop there, one of our new students joining us. Excellent job from Linda there. Now, let's go to the stock. I took a small loss on to begin because this was a good loss in the grand scheme of life, not just to say in hindsight, oh, a drop, but it goes to what we always teach. We had a little resistance here from the chart, more or less, a bit of around the top. Had a false breakout here and this technically is your pre-market high. So obviously in this trade, I was looking for the pop higher. Well, it got up towards there and broke over the VWAP. It started to move up nicely. I was looking maybe for an entry off the VWAP. I was a little late to the party, but I wasn't fully confident even of that move to start. I thought your better play was off like 157, 156 area right here. Need to call out in the chat. It actually moved right up towards there and on the second pop here, I went to take the trade. It goes to what we always say though, if it's not gonna make that big move up, or in my case here, it pulled immediately back under the level. That's where I wrote to you. It's like, it's gotta hold over 153. I can't have this really drop back down to 153. See that in the chat there. And as soon as it broke below that price, I got out, I took a 6 cent loss. It's on smaller size, obviously given pre-market, but it was $30 in full and with that big drop and it was a better trade and it was a good trade because the level is intact. It was just a matter of seeing the big move up. If you're not getting a big move up, you're gonna get a big move down. So that's what you're trying to not hold onto at least throughout the day, whether it's here in pre-market or you can't set stops, right? You can't set stops in pre-market. That makes it even more risky to a degree. But otherwise, this had good volume on the book. It has a tight spread, good tier size for right now in pre-market at least. It hasn't truly broken lower, like I thought it could do once I got out. I wrote it in the chat to you, like now it definitely looks cooked. It looks like there's a case for this to be totally done for now. It technically hasn't broken lower yet. So, you know, can we add this to our list? We can, but I'm gonna add this to our side list to begin. I'll come back to this just in a moment. There we go. Linda giving a nice shout out to Rich, my colleague here in the chat, Rich Liza. As soon as she saw his post, she went in. Usually, she's a tail in a towel for short. Learning every day recedes you. I love, well, I love dear the last part, Linda will definitely make that, will definitely look to help you on entries and exits and timing all together. And with that said, in terms of timing, the current time right now is about 9.09 Eastern. Let's just go right through our list right now. Let's go right from top to bottom here, see what else we could add. You know, perhaps the NXTP I'll talk about at the end again, the one from Friday. All right, so we got ARBB. Did we already, you know, we spoke about that. We didn't really put that on the main list at least. IINN, the next one we actually did. It doesn't hurt us to put this on our list. It's still up, you know, God knows how much percent and hopefully there's a case for this to make at least higher lows throughout the morning. It looks like it's making lower highs and soon to make a lower low. I would look to see and actually have out this a little plug time right now. Obviously all of our members and students inside our live trading room, we're certainly more privy to this, but stay tuned at 11 o'clock Eastern time, coming up for our weekly workshop this morning, folks. Today is not Monday, today being Tuesday, we got our traders talk workshop. So if there's any questions that you got for me here, please just shoot me a quick email, Josh at ctutrading.com. I just typed that in the chat board just for all this inside cybergroup and then we'll flash there on YouTube right now. Same deal for you folks. If there's any questions for our workshop, 11 a.m. Eastern time, if you're inside our live trading room, just stay right there, you're good to go. If you're on YouTube and you're looking to join us right from there too, seem to be set. But shoot me over a quick email, Josh at ctutrading.com, that's my email. And you know, first come, first serve in terms of getting your questions answered. ARBB, the one thing I will do before I move on, let's actually at least just jump back and pull fewer. I'm not gonna do this for every stock throughout this meeting here, but given what we saw on the II&N trade. So you have about 15,000 shares at 244. I mean, 250 you'd assume to be resistance anyway, and it was holding it pretty nicely earlier in pre-market. So 250, and then also you'd say 244, bit of a smaller order out there. Otherwise, you know, the combination of those prices together could act as resistance there. I'll slip it on our list, the ARBB. All right, RYZB, it's a buyout. I just wanted to show this because, hey, this is what a typical buyout looks like. So you just move forward from it, you just move on from it. Seemed to be set, I think, also on this GRCL trade. This one ended up making a pretty strong pop early in pre-market, like at 4 a.m., but then flattened out. As soon as you see the drop off and the flatten out after, it'll be speculated and then definitely as soon as the news actually confirms it, then you move on. This I don't think is a buyout, Lee. So, you know, one thing otherwise is with a lot of these Chinese companies, Chinese stocks trading overnight here for us in the U.S., that's where you're gonna see a bit of a gap up overnight on a lot of these Chinese equities like Lee. You can even do like BABA, NIO, you know, a lot of them at least. So, any news on Lee, company-wise? I don't have any news really on Lee. It would show it right from Benzinga. Actually, let me just show you that here pretty quick. Here's our news feed on Lee. There's really not much specific to the stock back from December 20th. There was something about their options trends or trades there, but that's pretty much it. So, yeah, I'm not as keen to follow that Lee trade. We had NIO at least on our pre-market list. You know, it's up nearly 5%. It's hanging in there.  Doesn't hurt, you know? See if that can make a better trade over time, at least throughout the morning. ALT also up over 5%, is still trying to fill the gap, actually getting pretty damn close now at this point. So, gap was pretty much around 10. It's around like basically like a little over 10, maybe $10, 10 cents. And then if it breaks that, then you could sell 11 just from where it really closed the day before that the gap happened. But, I mean, hey, it's making a nice trend again this morning. Don't mind adding ALT. All right, what else we got here?  Really, we're trying to stay above. Yeah, all right. So, let's hop over to the loser side here, see if there's anything looking good from there. We got a few more minutes until the open, folks. So, I wanna make sure that all of our students and myself have enough time to prep up, get ready to go before we start risking thousands and thousands of our hard earned dollars. There's a reason why I phrase it that way. Boyle not doing too much right there. Hey, there's not too much out there on the losers list this morning. NXTP once again, Friday's runner, you know, before Christmas weekend kicked in, popped up pretty nicely in pre-market here, broke higher later on. Then eventually, same fate as all the others. And then making lower highs and then eventually broke down. And now look at it here, it's down like 14, 15%. I guess it's trying to inch back up the last couple of bars, maybe trying to prove me wrong right now. I'm gonna keep this on our side list here. Maybe traders are gonna try and confuse NXTP with NXTP and maybe the combination of them together run. You know, little traders dyslexia tip there for all of us otherwise. But yeah, getting back to this one at least, this one's going nowhere so far. I don't really have much interest in this just yet, but it hasn't broken lower. I guess that's the last line in the sand there for that one. Your last selling point on making this a decent trade is the fact that it hasn't technically broken lower. But once it starts to rev up a little bit more, then I'll be more interested in it. All right, so for Linda, Michael, Brent, and all this otherwise inside our live trading room, definitely now is the time. Let me know if there's anything else just left that you want me to look at here. Before we call it, I would have typed this earlier on YouTube actually, but if you're not subscribed just yet, follow it along on our social media streams and platforms. Just hit the bell, click that subscribe button, be a friend, tell a friend, as I say, just at CybertradingUserHandle. But otherwise, we'll be back on later on this morning, obviously, for those of us in our trading room. We got the full morning ahead, market opening up in about 15 minutes, and then I'll be on just universally, just for all the simulcast at 11 o'clock for traders talk. So all right, so I'm good to go here. I mean, hey, for a holiday week, like I said initially, not really expecting too much out there. And if we get a lot more than we expect, then it's better to set the bar low, honestly.  Okay, okay, what's this? AIMD, up 18% of late. Take a look there. Yeah, when you get in the order book to look this thin and blank, there is no big money trading the stock at least yet. So I couldn't care any less about this trade right now. It's gonna distract us from NEO or ALT or the ARBB or even that IINN trade for right now. So there's gonna be a lot that looks like this. I'll pop up, like, oh, maybe it could pop.  Same could be said for our list, but at least those are a lot more liquid heading into the open. They have tighter spreads, they have better tier size altogether. So they're easier plays for the time being. I think that's pretty much it. Maybe one or two more for my side list or at least Blink actually pop 5% of the after hours on Friday night. That could be a decent one on my mental side list. I'm gonna actually put it on paper there for the side list there. And you could say the same to be said if the crypto stocks, the miners out there, Bitcoin held a lower high on the daily chart. So maybe that's something to keep in mind to see a pullback here on these trades finally. But like CLSK, Mara, Canon, all of those could be in play today. And those are at least very liquid. So if you do well on those, then you know who you are. But you know, hey, again, there's a lot that looks like this as a side list stock. TLR wise actually up a sneaky three and a half plus percent. You know, it's possible this can make a pop too. But for right now, I'm just gonna keep it on the B list, the side list otherwise. And then I think that I'll just about do it for all of us here. So let me know folks, if there's anything else, then just give me a quick shout on the chat board, but we'll be back on the mic just coming up at 9.30 for the opening bell inside Cyber Group. Now, again, if you're looking to join us from social media to our live trading room, you got a couple of options. You can scan that QR code on the top left of the stream. If you're fancy with your camera, fancy with your phone, just scan that QR code. It'll be good to go for all of us here at 9.30 even, have the week long trial, even with New Year's Day coming up this upcoming Monday. Just give a call to our office, speak to your education advisor. They'll be able to reset the trial, give you the full five days, obviously. We wouldn't rip you off in terms of the holiday week and whatnot. Hey, also, we got class coming up this week. We got the phase one stock course lined up coming up for the month of December. So just stay tuned for that. Ooh, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. Can't show that just yet. Can't show that just yet.  But got the phase one stock course lined up this week coming up tomorrow, Wednesday, and then Thursday as well. So Wednesday, Thursday this week coming up. All right, folks.


Good afternoon, everybody. I'm Tommy O'Brien, coming to you live from TFNN Headquarters in St. Petersburg, Florida, 2 p.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, two hours left to go on the trading day, and we got markets at session lows with all the major indices off almost 2%. Dow Jones, negative 525 points, trading at $25,911. You have NASDAQ right now, down 179 points, trading at $79.43. S&Ps, negative by 55 points, trading at $28.76. Dow Jones, higher price, lower yield, 10-year note, up 11 ticks, $123.31. You have the 30-year, up 28 ticks, trading at $148.22. Gold up $2, trading at $12.86. Oil, negative $1, trading at $61.17. We'll get the API at $430 tonight for Crude and Dollar Index, up 147 ticks, trading at $97.415. To get a feel percentage-wise, here we go. So you got the Dow, down 2.02% right at the top there. You got the S&P, down 1.98%. You got the NASDAQ, down 2.23%. Looking at Europe, negative across the board as well. Jumping over to the futures markets, we'll start it off with the S&P. So lows made within the last 15 minutes. Lows on the S&P of about $28.71, currently trading $28.77 to back things up a bit. Yesterday's close, up there at around $29.37. Huge, quite a move. Dow 30, quite a trend. There's the close yesterday. We spiked lower between 5 and 6, right at about 5 o'clock when the market and the world finds out that tariffs are coming, $1201.00 a.m. Eastern time on Friday, and pretty remarkable. We don't stop to the downside. There's your NASDAQ, quite a hit indeed. Yesterday, we're trading up there at about $78.12, looking at the NASDAQ 100. We're now trading at $76.24. You're talking about almost 200 points. Crude oil, trading pretty closely with the market. As you have crude, trade a bit lower overnight, and then the escalation begins. Actually, lows made though at about $60.66 at 10 a.m. this morning, just off those levels. There's your gold contract catching a bit of a bid, $12.85.95, and the euro, $111.79. Lots going on in the market. What else you have going on there? How about that VIX 2117 right now and after the bell? It's still earning season, even though we got a lot more going on. Lift out with their earnings after the bell. The expected one-day move over in that analyze tab on the Thinkorswim platform, $5.40. We'll see what happens. Stay tuned, folks. Dave White right now. Tom O'Brien live from 3 to 5. Have a great Tuesday.


Tell me how much you're obsessed with your favourite food. My turn. Chicken wing. More specifically, Wicked wing. Watch how fast I de-moner. No, mate. No, mate. No wastage. All you're left with is the mate. I love chicken wings.


The Brainerd Police Department is searching for a man who was last seen on or around July 4th in downtown Brainerd. John Allen Greenwald was active on his Facebook page, but family and friends haven't heard from him or seen him. The 29-year-old is described as a Caucasian, five-foot, 10 inches tall, 180 pounds with blue eyes and brown hair. Greenwald has several tattoos on his arms and neck. He has the letters John across his left fingers and Diane on his right forearm. His family became concerned because this is unusual behavior for Greenwald to not have contact with them for several days, so they reported him missing on July 14th. Investigators are on the case. Brainerd Police has been active in the search for Greenwald. If you have any information on Greenwald, you are asked to call the Brainerd Police Department. If you've enjoyed this segment of Lakeland News, please consider making a tax-deductible contribution to Lakeland Public Television.


we'll call we'll call the 26th regular meeting in common council order Pat would you call the roll please Bowman here Berg here Boonee Doyle Graf Manny Montemere Moody here oh excused excuse Peruz Rinflesch Stefan he's excused also and the reason Alderman Stefan is not here this evening is his mother passed away this weekend so council wishes we will be sending flowers to the funeral home and then we'll get a card to circulate around the council okay then Akron Van der Wiel one of them in Warner Weninger 14 present Corms present Alderman Graf thank you honor I'd move that we approve the minutes of the the last common council meeting in the same stand approve it's answered on the record moved a second at minutes of the previous council meeting stand approved under discussion hearing none all in favor I pose motion carry Alderman Manny would you lead us in a pledge please I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands one nation under God indivisible with liberty and justice for all these people are just tough to teach no reason to be heard Alderman Graf you are now moved that the hearings be closed moved is second to hearings be closed under discussion hearing none all in favor I posed motion carry public forum pat no consent agenda Alderman Graf thank you and I'll move that items 26 1 through 26 5 that all our seas be accepted and placed on file all hours be accepted adopted we pass all resolutions actually goes through 26 25 26 25 25 no 26 25 thought you said 5 oh no I said 26 1 through 26 5 okay at 26 25 we know that all documents from 26 1 through 26 25 all our O's be accepted filed our seas be accepted adopted and resolutions be put up on your passage under discussion who had a second okay Pat would you call the roll burger bonnet Doyle Roth I many Monta Mayor Perez windflash then Akron Vander wheel one woman Warner Winniger Bowman 14 eyes motion carry 26 26 by public protection safety recommended denying beverage operators license 5760 based on her non-cooperation with the committee Alderman Doyle thank you your honor I moved the report of committee be accepted and adopted they moved as reported committee be accepted and adopted under discussion yes I'd like to inquire if miss Hartman is here to speak in her own behalf miss Harbin she has not put go ahead with the proceedings is there any discussion hearing none would you call the roll bonnet Doyle hi graph many Monta Mayor Perez windflash then Akron Vander wheel one woman Warner Winniger Bowman Berg 14 eyes motion carry 26 27 30 to be referred 26 31 that will be referred also and there's discussion on that Alderman I heard a beep no Alderman Warner I think your honor I guess what I read this document I did talk Alderman graph about it the finance chair and I just I try to not have a problem with the last sentences in this document but I still do and I'd like to make some changes and refer to finance that way and the issue that's contained in the last paragraph that they feel they want to talk about I think they still can do that so I would like to amend the document and I would like to do so by amending in the third sentence where it says additional says additional I'd like to mend that to the word take additional out and insert the word three where where it says additional police officers where it says additional take additional just it should it should read recommending the hiring of three police officers not additional they're not additional because they're already part on the to correct so you're taking additional out and taking additional out and in its place putting the word three and then that as that reads on police officers one now and two by the end of 2004 recommends that the documents be referred to the committee on finance of new common counsel from that point on I would like to remove the rest of that sentence the word additional is actually taken from the original document it's not part of this document so the recommendation is really the only thing that you're going to be acting on I understand that but the word additional in itself is these are not additional officers they are on the to so it's it's what they're at what this document the intent of it was to ask is to fill the to with the police department not to add additional officers the word additional in there makes it sound like we're increasing the size of the police force and and I think that that I don't really know it's it's semantics but I think it's an important distinction and I think we should okay that I'm saying is that was part of the wording of the original RC 341 and I believe that okay so okay Alderman Warner if I think Alderman Van Akron has the document before if I remember correctly that was for one police officer known if the budget exactly money in a budget from the state that other two would be filled well not just the state the budget in general it obviously we don't have the money we're not going to hire somebody if you don't have the money but I think that has to be part of their last last meeting right it was a minute that 2004 was going out of there that we're not hiring two at the end of 2004 we're going to hire if the budget allows allows we got 2004 again and that's no long well in that's not only in it but if the budget allows isn't in here anymore just says we're going to hire two by the end of 2004 doesn't save the budget and I could and I could agree with making that change also because that's the way it came out of public protection and and and Salah and grievance public protection came out we should hire the officer Salah and grievance said we should hire one officer now and to buy the end of 2004 if we can come up with funding and all those are gone and instead of that it says I don't believe it was quite right all them in order great so I'm here it's came up with we hire one now and we hire two if the budget allows it when a budget time came up not 2004 was made it out of there completely and it was amended last last meeting that's what I was thinking I can and you can take 2004 out I'm fine with that if the budget allows because obviously we're not going to hire any police officers if the budget doesn't allow it for it doesn't say too old for it doesn't now not in the recommendation and that the recommendation is what was amended last time it says it in ours huh it says it in mind it says in mind it says add one now and two by the end of 2004 that's not the part of the recommendations what I'm saying after the semicolon hey you have your recommendation that's what was amended last time saying that you would hire three officers if the council goes on record for a joint dispatch with the county that would be in place by 2005 that was the amendment last meeting last meeting was in front of fire was not hired in 2004 was the hire by the budget right if I may finance committee their last meeting made a recommendation that this came to us originally after our last council meeting which was on the was it the 8th oh that's right okay on the 8th we were referred this document at our last finance committee meeting what we did was we discussed ways that we could fulfill this request which was to find the funding one of the ways we we thought about finding funding funding was to explore the this joint dispatch with the county and if that could be in place by 2005 there would be additional funding available and that's why I know Alderman Warner is was saying that they should delete that but this is just a report of committee it's nothing that is going to be voted on by this council except the phrase in here says that one of the things that finance committee came up with at this point was to go with a joint dispatch now they may recommend something else when this goes back to the new committee on finance and it may may take out the word joint just say have the county do the entire dispatching for for the city but then that is something that this council has to act on those recommendations so okay and I guess when I read this that's the part that bothers me is it is us it is us seeing in there to the new council that if we approve sending this forward with those words in there that this council in some way agrees with only hiring those police officers if we go to a joint dispatch center and I feel uncomfortable with that because we haven't debated it on the floor of this council and I think that part should be taken out and finance can look at all the issues in finance kind of all of them and one of them thank you I'd have to support all of them in order on that one it always seems that the police department which has an established to is on the short end of the stick in German we call it a schnitzel kind or a stepchild and I don't know why the police department is always the stepchild other departments who are in public safety protection have a full to at all times the police department doesn't somewhere this council voted to have a authorized strength of the police department and somehow we have chosen to take the police department and say well we can save some bucks here we can save some bucks there we will just go without a couple of more cops on the street and yet everywhere you go people tell me I would support an extra increase in my property tax if it bought me two three four more officers on the street people are worried they don't like the way things are going on the streets of Sheboygan we have armed robberies now we have mini marks being held up we have drug use this stuff never existed 20 years ago it was unheard of so it just really amazes me that we can't seem to ever fill the to on the police department I don't know why they always have to be left hanging out in the cold when we can find monies for everything in the world what are we supposed to tell people if there's somebody hitting on the head and there's nobody around call a bus driver I mean we got plenty of bus drivers that aren't doing too much you know something has got to be done here and I think it's about time we stopped using the police department as a convenient means to boost our budget if we have to say the two dirty words raised taxes then let's say them and let's get some cops on the street where people want them to be and we've got support out there for that I talked to a lot of people and they tell me a lot of stuff now it's true people are gonna say well you're prejudiced you run a police program yeah I'm prejudiced I want good law enforcement in the city of Sheboygan I want good fire protection that's what I'm prejudiced for and if we have to raise the taxes a couple of bucks then we got to say those mean dirty words raised taxes okay all the money for us I was just gonna say did we get a no we didn't but hang on all right go ahead okay honor yes thank you I guess everything is being said as merit and deserve discussion my only concern is that we amended a document that was forwarded to this council by the salient grievance and all I recall is that document saying we're gonna hire one now and two if the if the budget allows it in 205 correct that's all we need to act on tonight in my opinion and we can go off in different directions and talk about what's needed and what's not but that's that's a good discussion that we should have when the next budget comes around okay your second that cancer Alderman Wong of this question about why did he was it wasn't filled up in the y-war three short that was agreement with the police chief that he'd hold a couple guys low he felt it was adequate to do that so but now with the way things are changing he feels that he would like to go back up that was one of the grievance when the budget came around that that was discussed your honor you're correct because the chief came in a couple of times and that was this part of going in keeping the budget on was to take the people off it wasn't a sovereign grievance he that's what he came in with so it wasn't us okay so do we have this right now yes what I was referring to was the recommendation from from salaries and grievances to finance to hire the three officers that was the most the amending motion last time okay then finance did come in with the one with going to a joint dispatch that's really the only recommendation now it is not a resolution it's not an ordinance it's a recommendation so I've got it that you want to leave the word additional and add the number three and end your recommendation after the words the new common council anyone have anything else before it goes Alderman Warner and ending after the new common council that's it so the rest you would strike okay I'm fine with that all of them on thank you mr. Mayor okay this piece of paper came from finance now what was just offered as as an amendment is that what finance meant this back to new finance committee with one of the ways to do this to do what the original request was was to also go on record and explore the possibility of a joint dispatch it can be taken off I won't support that only because the four members of finance that voted to make that recommendation if I'm chair of finance again which I believe I will be or I'm hoping I'm going to be I will remember that this was on there so I will bring it in at that time again so otherwise I'll bring it in as my own because it doesn't say must it says explore correct all right thank you okay all of an array thank you your honor I hear with mr. Alderman graph that what we're really doing is the finance committee is reporting back to us with the recommendation I was not at that finance committee meeting but we're voting on is accepting this document saying this is what they recommend to do there is no resolution attached there is no ordinance attached it's only a report from that committee reporting back to us what they discussed in the recommendation I'm uncomfortable come in this council changing what they're recommending to us when I wasn't there at that meeting so I also won't support the change I think it's a good idea I agree with what we're trying to do by hiring additional police officers but that's not what we're doing there's no ordinance here what we're trying to do is just get a report accepted from finance to this common counsel I think we should take with their report and and as is not changing all of an order last time yes I think I did have something I wrote just to kind of address why I feel this way about that sentence in the document I'm not against finance discussing those issues in finance although I think that's something that the police department should and the fire department should be on those discussions regarding joint dispatch because we're talking about the health and safety of our citizens in the city and they are the ones who respond to it so finance should be saying we're gonna have joint dispatch whether you like it or not without studying the facts and I know you're not but when you if you just read this raw that's how it can come out at you and I guess what I wanted to know is why would we tie the hiring of police officers to whether or not we support supported joint dispatch center in the first place to me that just doesn't make sense if we need police officers which we do we should hire them yes we need to find the funding we all know that we certainly are not going to hire someone and not pay them we have to remember these are not additional positions I think that's important that's why I felt that word really didn't belong in there these are existing positions on a department's table of organization and all and all them in vernacron is correct as part of the budget saving measures the chief did agree not to fill those positions but now he's saying he can't do that again for another year to tie the hiring of of needed city employee especially a public safety employee to whether or not we can reach a future agreement with another government body does not make sense I don't care if it's a police position a fire position or public works position it just simply doesn't make sense to me to tie it hiring of anyone's in city government to whether we can reach an agreement with another government body if we want to look at joint dispatch to me that's a different issue changing the wording of this will not impact in any way the finance committee's options for funding these positions by not taking the wording of this document I think I still think that we will be sending what I believe would be a false message to the next council and the next finance committee we'll be stating that we fully debated joint dispatch that it's a great thing and we'll be done and that we agree with this implementation just by those words that are on there even though it is just a report of committee that's in that simply isn't so it's not something that we have debated it's not something that has been investigated they looked at it several years ago three or four years ago we talked about it with the county and we haven't been at the issue I think it's more far more complex than a two-minute argument or in this case was turning into a 12-minute argument I don't think we should be sending this forward to new council because it's not something that this whole council has debated and says that we can even agree with and and in the new council they can discuss the issue and I think it I think it does something to this document that if nothing else sends a message out there to the police department that we're really not interested in hiring police officers unless you do something else that we don't even know if it's going to be a good thing or not so I just think that in that case we can take that out there's Alderman Groff said they can still discuss this and we can get public protection involved in there in the police and fire departments who have to respond from the Joint Dispatch Center should there ever be one and at that time if it's a good thing we're probably going to go for it I was mentioned that the county sheriff thinks that they could do it well sure with providing him to present additional resources he could but you know what the city sheboygan could do dispatch for the entire county too because they have the same set up the county has yes it's a duplication of services that's why we're talking about it but dispatch in the city is not the same as dispatch across the whole county we have far more calls in the city sheboygan than they have across the county and far more miles and roads and streets and houses that are compacted in a small area so there's a lot of issues out there but I just don't think we need to include that in here thank you thank you Alderman Groff thank you your honor just to answer one of Alderman Warner's question the reason this is in is because we were charged we the finance committee was charged with finding ways that could provide funding for these three police officers this was one thing that was mentioned we put it in our report because we didn't have enough time in finance to discuss all the other things that may come up and so we put it in this report to refer to the committee on finance of the new new committee we did not debate the issue of joint dispatch we did not say this was going to be done that was going to be done because that's not the issue tonight the issue is only this finance committee document whether or not this and it was an issue that came up in finance that said if we would do this this would be a possible way to get funding for those three officers period maybe next time we have an issue like this we should have joint meetings at some of the committees to discuss this and so everybody's on the same page we're selling grievance finance and public protection safety everybody's on the same page we all all go in the same direction Pat would you call the roll please this is just on the amendment everybody know what the amendment is yeah would you read it please the amendment is to delete delete the word additional and add the number three and end the recommendation after the new Common Council and so that's deleting the rest of the sentence Daryl Manny Montemayor I forgot Graf from the wrong place Perez Rindflash Van Akron Vanderveel Wonderman Warner Weninger Bauman Berg Bonnet nine eyes five nose carried yes I'll make a motion that as amended the document be referred to finance committee so we move to the second the document referred to finance committee under discussion Alderman right I just want to clarify I hope those are watching at home don't take the no vote to the amendment as against the police or against hiring a new police force to me it's the structural the Common Council's run on a committee basis I was not at that committee I have to accept the report as the committee discussed it and use that as information there so in no way I think most of those no votes would agree with me we're just trying to maintain the integrity of the committee structure here and I'll we'll vote to accept it now okay don't know the discussion all in favor I posed motion carried matters laid over 2543 a resolution by Alderman Graf and Longerman authorizing entering to agreement for employee assistant program Alderman Graf and I move that the resolution be put upon its passage you want to take 2544 also or well that's a different committee all right that's fine I need a second let's move to a second resolution be put upon its passage under discussion hearing none would you call the roll please Graf I many Monta Mayor Perez we're in I'm sorry then Akron Vanderuil Wongam and Warner Winnigar Bowman Berg Bonnet Doyle 14 eyes motion carry 2544 resolution by Alderman Graf Stefan and Bonnie authorizing transfer of corporations in the 2004 budget Alderman Graf you under that resolution and 2545 which is a resolution by myself Stefan and Bonnet authorizing the transfer of corporations also in the 2004 budget I would move that those two resolutions be put upon their passage moved in second to two resolution be put upon their passage under discussion hearing none would you call the roll please many Monta Mayor Perez Rinfai Ben Akron Vanderuil Wongam and Warner Winnigar Bowman Berg Bonnet Doyle Graf 14 eyes motion carried 25453 RC by public protection safety recommending filing documents submitting a communication from Street T's on Yang requesting removal of a no parking here to corner sign in front of her business and passing the attached ordinance Alderman Warner thank you I make a motion to accept and file the report of officer and pass the attached ordinance report committee moved in second to adopt to report a committee and passed to general ordinance under discussions under discussion your honor the removal of the parking restrictions will allow Miss Yang's customers to park in front of her place of business at 13th and Michigan the outdated the parking zone there that had no parking from here to corners and outdated zone that dates back to prior to reconstruction of 14th Street and this will allow people to park right in front of her business right now they have to park about almost a whole building down to the east so that's public protection safety committee and not traffic sergeant looked at this and recommended to change if there's no other discussion Pat would you call the roll Monta Mayor Perez Renflex Ben Akron Vanderbilt Wangeman Warner Weninger Bowman Bird Pony Doyle Graf Manny 14 eyes motion carried other matters Steve I think we still have one on the agenda okay 2653 we just did 2632 that would lie over finance okay line over that will go to finance in 2633 that's that one can be accepted and filed an ordinance be put upon his passage on your amended page of the agenda hold him in order I think I would make a motion to accept and file the report of officer and that the ordinance be passed moving to second accept and file the RO and ordinance be put upon his passage under discussion under discussion your honor this is from the plan commission and it is rezoning changing the zoning map she was only map for the South Pier district from class PPUD preplanned unit development to class South Pier planned unit development 2004 one we discussed as a plan commission and and it's a zoning change in the district just know the discussion that would you call the roll Perez Renflex Ben Akron Vanderbilt Wangeman Warner Weninger Bowman Bird Pony Doyle Graf Manny Montemay 14 eyes motion carried Steve 2634 is a committee report by the building use committee with respect to the municipal parking lot at seventh and Penn that will go to Sheboygan transit Alderman Weninger I would like to say a few words this is my last day under city council and I represented the fifth district constitution for four years I represented them honest and fair and to the best of my knowledge so the incoming outer person good luck to you and to all of you we had our disagreements all your outer people but we always came together and respected each other and I thank you for that there are three special people at this council and I call them the pillar of this city council they became my mentors my friends and they will always be my friends thank you Mike Warner thank you Tim graph and thank you Anthony Pony you are the greatest I like to think city clerk Pat Losey and her staff Debbie Sue and Linda for all your help sometimes I was a ding-dong but you helped me and now a very very special thank you to our honorable mayor your honor it was a privilege and an honor to serve with you on this council and I thank you what you have done for this city and will continue to do for the city keep up the good work thank you thank you now I will spend more time with my beloved we have W.R. Silver I will gonna improve my golf skills be needed but I will continue attending council meetings I'm gonna change I'm gonna sit back there and I will watch you can I say again thank you sure in our feet I say not but I will be back thank you be caring with Alderman Doyle thank you your honor I wish to thank the voters of district three for allowing me to serve two terms it's been an honor and a pleasure serving with the common council and the mayor and I found the department heads to be especially outstanding and I thank you for the great cooperation that I found individually I'd like to thank Sue Richards and Chuck Adams for making the liquor licensing go extremely well I'd like to thank Sergeant Tarkowski for helping me with all the abandoned vehicles I'd like to thank Matt Livingston who answered every complaint I put in despite having just been literally part time at building inspection and also Kathy at municipal services building who took care of every garbage and mowing complaint that I ever submitted thank you thank you well thank you your honor usually at the end of our council year I'll usually give a short speech about departing council members be it by retirement or by the agony of defeat I'd like to first speak about Alderman Moody she's actually not in our presence this evening but I know very well she's watching on television tonight so it'll be as if I'm talking directly to you Betty Betty you and I were elected together I can't remember when but I think it was about let me think a hundred years ago something like that I mean you kind of know exactly right was mayor you've served on quite a few committees during your many terms as Alderman it makes me wonder exactly how you really did it you even filled in when someone would ask you to attend a meeting in place of one of us that was really dedication a job well done do you remember the saying when we first started on council two kicks at the cat I think you remember it mayor yes I know that for sure that's right I'm gonna say it one more time two kicks at the cat when someone would get up more than once to speak on the same subject they would always refer to it as such well after much convincing of our fellow council members and our mayor it seemed to finally go away as pet owners we took these words very seriously and I hope never to hear them again in this council room we know you will miss working with friends you've made during this time and I know I will continue our friendship for a very long time but I tell you what we will be seeing you at garage sales and don't forget about your eBay business either we will all miss you I'm gonna move on then to Alderman Winniger who is departing us also this evening at her last council meeting and mayor may I direct personally to her thank you I think we will miss the feistiness that you have shown on this council never afraid to work for your constituency or ask questions Alderman Winniger personally has worked hard for those who lived on or near Camelot Boulevard she also came prepared for the meetings I personally think you have served the city well in the short time that you have been here and I really think we'll be hearing from you again as I already heard you say and we will miss you too Jerry Doyle Jerry has served a year with our late Alderman Jerry Schneider and has been my colleague for several years since Jerry has worked hard for the two districts which he and I both represent not only by improving them but also helping improve the entire city during meetings he was never afraid to express his very interesting points of view one thing I will say he did all of his homework and was well prepared for every meeting which he has attended I'll miss working with you Jerry and I only wish Jerry a good retirement but the rest of our departing also all the persons the best and all they do thank you thank you Alderman Warner I think your honor I did these alphabetically this evening DMW got a little bit of a ring to it but I'll start with Alderman Doyle Jerry Jerry Jerry probably one of the most interesting intelligent stubborn persons I've ever met one day he's on your side on this issue in the next day he's against you on another it always whether he agrees with you or does not always a gentleman when the debate has ended no matter the outcome and that's the way a council should function Alderman Doyle has been an extremely valuable member of the Public Protection and Safety Committee as Vice Chairman Jerry oversaw the licensing function for I believe it's too past the two past years and he's worked very hard with a licensing clerk to streamline and improve the liquor licensing process to a point where it is much more effective than ever before Jerry has been a strong advocate of building inspection and worked hard to address the needs of the city and his district in maintaining our neighborhoods and their needs Jerry has really never missed a beat except for perhaps once you see I can get into you one thing I do not have a white horse they are not allowed in the city but Alderman Doyle has been an active and hard-working member of the Common Council and his efforts have made sheboying any better place to live for all of us Alderman Doyle I thank you for your service to your constituents and the city sheboying and especially working with you really has been a really good thing for our committee and for the other things we've done together and I do appreciate it next is Alderman Moody all the person Moody has been a servant to her district for I think it's 14 years I could be awful a little on that but Betty has been involved in all the major decisions that she boy can had it has moved sheboying forward in the past decade I have had the privilege of working with Betty on public protection safety for at least three years she was on our committee this year once before and then the first year I was on the council I think with now State Senator Libam she was on the committee with us at that time I think also she's been a strong supporter of her city's police and fire departments as well as building inspection and public works and Betty has served on many committees public works among them and others and always with distinction keeping in mind the needs of the people in her district and the city at large never afraid to ask a question and always a pleasure to work with Betty the council will miss you and so will she boy again and I thank you for your years of unselfish service to the city of Sheboygan and I did get those pictures on of the Blue Harbor Resort and the cruise ship that was in there on this CD and I was going to give them to you tonight so I'm gonna have to deliver them now since you're not here but they are on that CD and it only took about two minutes Alderman Wenner all the person Ingrid Wenner is a person whose presence brings smiles to everyone's face Ingrid has served Sheboygan and its people very well on the public protection safety committee finance and salary and grievance Ingrid has served Sheboygan with its best interests in mind Ingrid also served on strategic fiscal planning and helped us to hold her budget to virtually no increase in the levy this past year she served on the Mears International Committee the 50th anniversary of the Korean War commemorative committee among others she's brought an insight and opinion to the council that is not likely to be replicated by anyone her can-do attitude and unflinching work ethic should be admired by all of us Ingrid is also a friend a real joy to be around and I will miss her on the council she has assured me that she will not let the council off the hook and she made that statement quite well and we'll work in the background to ensure our success the cities and the councils to one of the nicest and most wonderful people I've ever met Ingrid I'll miss you and soul Sheboygan thank you anyone else have anything they want to say before we adjourn I just want to say Alderman Doyle Alderman Wininger and Alderman Moody Alderman Moody couldn't be with us this evening she has a feeling well but I'd like to thank you for your service on this council each one did an excellent job we appreciate it and I'm sure your constituents do too and good luck in the future no matter what you do good luck in the future you're welcome okay Alderman somebody beep Alderman draw is this year's past president I thought I just say thank you to all all the council members working so hard this this past year and I know whoever will take the place of myself will take my place on that they I'm sure will get your support and you'll be able to deal with them and then to the three people that will be leaving I want to thank you for your service Betty I've worked with early in my former career when I was on the council before that this time so I've worked with her and I know how she operates and she was always there supportive Jerry has been on two committees with me this past year and I thank him for all that he's done for that and to Ingrid who was my vice chairman of finance I just want to thank her special specially because she did take my place on several committees and then also she she did serve on strategic fiscal planning because I supposedly had two votes but couldn't utilize them both so we gave her one and I appreciate her support I would move to adjourn sign it down all in favor