Welcome to the rundown, a recent Navadment announced updates to uniform policy, grooming standards, and the launch of a new uniform working group. Some of the updates included allowing, with commanding officer's approval, the wear of the Coyote Brown ball cap with coveralls and flight suits, and also allowing command logos on t-shirts worn with the Navy working uniform type 1, 2, and 3 coveralls and flight suits. Also announced was the upcoming improved general safety boot, and the completion of fitting and wear tests for the new female officer and chief petty officer slacks and skirts. All are scheduled to be available later this year.  The Navy has updated the Navy Credentialing Opportunities Online or Navy Cool mobile app. The update provides a new, completely redesigned user experience with quicker load times and new enhanced features, including optional searches of Navy career areas, which allows the user to find a Navy rating or designator related to major occupational areas, and an in-demand bi-career area search, which allows the user to find what civilian certifications and licenses are in high demand in civilian occupational areas. The Navy Cool app is one part of Sailor 2025's Rating Modernization Initiative to help Sailors chart their career in the Navy and after the Navy with a blend of academics, technical training, apprenticeships, certifications, and licenses. For more information, see the story on navy.mil or download the free app from the Navy App Locker or the Google Play or iTunes Store. The Navy joins the nation in observing National Hispanic Heritage Month, September 15th through October 15th, highlighting the history and accomplishments of Americans from Spanish speaking areas. This year's theme is Hispanics, one endless voice to enhance our traditions. The Navy is strengthened by diversity of its force, as it recognizes that patriots of Hispanic American heritage continue to build on the strong legacy of freedom and service. That's all for this week. Connect with us on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube at USNPeople. You can listen to our collection of Sailor to Sailor podcasts at navy.mil slash cmp. For any questions or to sign up for our monthly newsletter, send us an email at usnpeople.fct at navy.mil. For the Chief of the Naval Personnel, I'm M.C.D. Tyler Preston. Thanks for watching.


Great, how are you? I know it's been kind of a, I think, a crazy market item. Maybe it's going to mean not to market. I'm just happy some of these things are moving now. I'm going to try to share my screen. Let me know if you can see the Tesla. I can see Tesla. Okay. Okay. So did you hear what I said about this in the room this morning? Yes. I was in the room all morning. Okay. So did you hold it until it got onto the previous high? I actually, I got out around 1790. Well, I was good. I was good. And I walked away with just short of $12,000. It was like $11,997 or something. Okay. That's great. So then was this, so then that was bought two today of the 1700 calls or you carried over one from last week and bought one today. No, I cashed out less with positive. I mean, I don't remember. I bought two new ones this morning on the open. Yes. You know, so, but the money I made today, it was on a brain on two brand new calls. So you totally though didn't follow your money management guidelines. I mean, I'm, you made 12 grant, which is great, but you really only should have bought one.  But I'm just saying like, you did this before and it. I know it was, it was risk, but I think it was risk, but I felt confident about the charts today and everything. And it was really volatile times and something extra and same was going on today. I may not have been so brave because I thought it over before I did it really believe me. I mean, it's your money. I think you can take the risk, but then if you don't do it the same on every train and then one loses and that happens to be the one that loses, like, do you know what I mean? Oh yeah. I've learned that the hard way. Yeah. Anyway, I'm glad that you did so well on this. I kind of wish you had held the one from last week. I know, but you know, I didn't in going, I'm just trying. I think I got a little gunshot for a second because I made some bad moves.  I didn't exit, you know, a while back. I don't know what was wrong. I just kind of sat there and watched everything happen with amazement and then I didn't get out. Yeah. Well, I know you got out of the Disney and the Facebook before they popped, but you did get out of those with money. Oh yeah. I got, I mean, I was fine on things like that, but I did get out those two soon, but I'm thinking back a little way.  I think around, I think that day I was really up around $20,000 and I didn't get out. I don't know what that was or what trades they were. Do you remember? We had some Boeing. We had it. I think we had, gosh, I'm trying to, it was when we were doing a lot of Boeing. Anyway, these, that they were down, but that morning everything shot up. I mean, it was. I know what day you're talking about. That was like more than a month ago, but I remember screaming. A while ago. And after I did that, I think I got a little bit, a little bit discouraged with myself because I couldn't believe I did that. And I think you have a difficult time reacting quickly, but I don't think you need to do that. You could decide in the morning in the pre-market. You could decide. You just make the decision and then when you make the decision, then that's the end of the story. But when you don't make a decision at all, you freeze kind of like a deer in a headlights. You don't know, you don't have it pre-planned then by the time you can't make up their mind at the moment. Do you know what I mean? Oh, totally. I know what the deer feels like now. Trust me. Yeah. But today was good because I said this is going to go to 1800 today. That's it. Like I said that. So therefore today was really easy, I think, to manage it. It was, it was great. I love the way you talk today because I think it gave me some of my confidence back. You're like, I'll take this. No, because I'm serious. I have to be honest. I know I've done well this year, but let me tell you, I mean, I get really upset with myself if I'm not performing like I think I should when I do this stuff, you know. Yeah, I know.  I know that you don't have any confidence. All right. What are you doing with the cues or did you get out of them? Or did you hold them? I'm still in the cues. I'm only down 250 bucks.  No, I don't think you need to tell this. I was just going to say, I think this has a pop tomorrow. So I, yeah. And I mean, I'm not feeling at all worried about this apple. I mean, I'm not, you know, it's back before 60. I'm staying in both of those. And that's it for now. That's exactly what you've called us when I'm training. So this apple is probably going to get buff tomorrow and the markets probably going to get buff tomorrow. I really didn't know what this would do today as far as how it was going to close. And then we were going to day trade it. Then we didn't. Then it didn't set up right. And then it fell. It just fell all the way down into noon. But there's nothing wrong with this. And actually the price of this compared to what, whatever you paid for this, I'm guessing this isn't really, this looks fine. Like even look at the price of it's really not that bad. Like I wouldn't worry about it. I know it's going around, but I'm not worried. I'm okay with it. I'm comfortable. You know, I have a love thing for Apple anyway. But I'll tell you.  It's Tesla. I wanted to get into the 1800, but I didn't go back in and it just went to 1802.  What do you mean? What do you mean? I'm being honest because I think everybody needs to hear this. It's easy to get like, go like, oh, I want to go back in, but I know better as what I want to do versus what I should do when it's this high. You know, it may go higher tomorrow and I think you're probably right. It's going to because there's a lot of euphoria going on around Tesla right now. But then I'm like, oh, if I don't, I'm going to lose about $5,000 before I get out. What did I say about this this morning? What else did I say? Do you remember what else I said about it? Let me think a minute. You said it. You said if it hits 1800 today, you feel like it's going to keep running tomorrow. And I agree with you. But what else did I say, though? I said it's probably going to do what then? And then it's going to go poof. Like all the air is going to go out of the balloon. I believe is what you said. I said it's going to gap up then tomorrow and then you're going to have to exit it immediately. And sometimes that's really hard to do because it's going to drop off. Well, I know I remember when you said that, and that's actually this is good. This is where I have problems. Like I'm good at watching it run up, but I'm like all of a sudden, I think I get mesmerized and I'm like, oh my God, I forgot to get out.  I think you're just thinking this trade is so good, it's going to keep going. But every trade has a beginning, middle, and end, and you can't forget that. Right. I think when the markets really go over all, it's easy to forget that for a minute until you do something crazy and get a reality check. Yeah, well, the beginning of the year was a lot better as far as follow through than it was during the period of the last couple months. But I will say that I'm glad that things are starting to get some nice follow through here. But I still don't, I don't think that means being lazy about taking targets. No, I agree. I mean, I'm trying to be super, super lazy. I think you did great. But I would not go back into this here because you had a great trade. You oversized yourself to begin with. So, like, just look at it like that. Like, if you would have just taken one today, then you wouldn't have made what you did. So you were aggressive, so just leave it. Like, you can't be aggressive in every trade. And I think sometimes you've been aggressive. And I think it's going to keep going. But I think you'd be better off not doing that, actually. But, you know. I'm not doing it. I'm not. I mean, I respect what you say. I do. So. Anyways, you did good with this today. And so then let's talk about Apple. What's the target on Apple then tomorrow morning if you get up. And tomorrow morning, wherever this closes today, if it gaps up, what's the target on Apple tomorrow? If it goes 470. Yep. That's it. And then the party's over. Everybody run when it hits 470. And it depends where it opens. So if this opens up like a 465, who knows this could run up to 475 tomorrow. I don't know. So we'll see where this opens. I imagine we'll be out of Apple early tomorrow for some reason. That's just my feeling. I don't know why. And then what about the queues then if you're staying with this, what's the target for this? The target for the queues is sorry, I'm trying to look at your charts. Yeah, I blow it up. Yeah. The daily. The target for the queues would be it's above that point right there. Anything above 274. Really? Right. We're at 275.39. So if we gap up tomorrow, like if we close here at 275.39 and we gap up tomorrow at 275.40, where do you think we'd run? 280. That would be like the dream target. Yeah. Yeah. I remember you said that one time. I don't remember. I really don't know the rest. Okay. I say 277 would be a realistic dream target 280. And I'm not saying that's a given anyways. But again, if we, you know, 277, 278 dream target 280, that would be amazing. And then we might pull back, even though I don't talk like this, but I know you look at these things, then we might, then we might swing around again. But anyways, it's interesting because the spies here are still flirting with the high, but they're not over it. I mean, they're just not over it. But anyway. I know. Go ahead. Boeing's messing something up, I think for the, what, for the spy today and the diamonds? Is that it? The two? Yeah, the banks were lower. The banks were lower this morning. Now, tomorrow morning is Walmart. Okay. And then remember targets this week, you've done well with those in the past, but you don't like the shorts.  So I don't know if I'm calling puts in these or not. How, how, have you done well with these puts lately or not? I think the only puts you did well with were throwing. Yes, but I've made some money in the puts lately that you've called.  And I don't know why I just have to pay a lot more attention when I'm in puts. I can't explain it. What do you mean, as far as getting out or what do you mean? Yeah, I don't know. Sometimes I think I, yeah, my exits, my exits and entries have just bothered me a little bit lately. So I'm just kind of going through some reviews on charting and stuff. As far as the entries, if you get in and it doesn't go right away, then it doesn't mean you have a bad exit like, I mean a bad entry like Apple, because sometimes if you don't get in right of ways and then it goes, you'll miss it. So I think it all evens out in the end as far as that goes, but your exits, I think need improvement, but I think you did a great job with this today, because I gave you the number and you had the conviction. And just look at this right now. This is, look at this. This is going up into the close here, 820. 820 again, I know you're, I know you're out of it, but this is very interesting here because I kind of felt like momentum would come into this if it got over that number, but I didn't know exactly what time it was going to do it. I'm just kind of thinking right now, like people that are holding this still, if it keeps running like this, you better get out of the close. Don't hold your breath about in the morning on this one. I'm not holding this till tomorrow. Absolutely no. Yeah, but this is kind of like that day with the Facebook. I know you weren't watching it then where it just like poof, it went and it just went off like a rocket. Yeah, I bet it's going to do it. And I accident. Oh, well, it's okay.


Thank you very much for coming here to this press conference. Sam mentioned most of it. We've been traveling abroad to meet different people, both from Europe and from our diaspora. And we've been doing this regularly now. We went to the United States and now we've come to the EU, trying to get a sense of what is going on here and also to give people a little bit of a sense of what is going on back home. So happy to take your questions. I have three questions if that's okay. Can we do one at a time please? The first question is, what was the main message for the parliamentarians here and what do you expect from them? What do you expect from Europe?  No. And it's more of a conversation than a message.  It's an exchange of ideas about what is going on in India, what's going on here, the type of cooperation that we can do. So it's more of a, the frame is a conversation. We discussed with the parliamentarians across the board, relationship between India and Europe, changing globe, transition into a new sort of energy paradigm, into a new mobility paradigm. So that was what the discussion was about. Yeah, we were giving them a sense of the type of challenges India is facing, economic challenges, other challenges. The general sort of attack on the democratic institution. So that's what we discussed. Go ahead. Yes. Can you speak a little louder? We're going to be meeting with Mr. Modi, we're going to be meeting with the government there. And my question for you is, do you feel with all of these, do you feel with all of these meetings they're going to be having, the Western view, are they giving Hindu nationalism a free pass? Are they giving the persecution of Muslims and minorities a free pass in India? I don't think, I think the G20 is an important conversation. And it's a good thing that India is hosting it. Of course, there are issues in India that we raise. But I don't think, I think the framing that are they giving them a free pass is not exactly correct. Obviously, there's a war going on in Europe right now. And there's been this constant, I wouldn't say an allegation, but there is the fact that India has close relations with Russia. And we've had your different leaders talking to India about it and feeling this aspect of trying to go India away from Russia. They won't bring up the persecution of minorities and Muslims in India, leaders from the West. No, I mean, India of course has a relationship with Russia. India has a relationship with the United States. India is a large country and by nature of being a large country, it will have relationships with many other countries. So, that's a normal thing. That's not, you know, India has every right to have a relationship with whoever it wants. There is of course, there are serious issues about the type of actions that are being taken with regards to, with regards to institutions, with regards to democracy and stuff. And yeah, we would hope that there is a sense that there are, there are underlying issues. Let's have a follow-up. No, no, please just, yes sir. We know that the Modi government takes quite cautious position on the conflict and the war. Russia held, Russia held against Ukraine. So, that I curious what is the opposition point of view on the issue. And the related question is that cautious position of the Indian government related to the sharp increasing of the oil supply supply of Russian oil to India. Thank you. I think the opposition by and large would agree with India's position, current position on the conflict. We have a, we have a relationship with Russia and I don't think the opposition would have a different view than what the government is currently proposing. I am from actually Kashmir. I would like to ask a question related to Kashmir issue. And what is, what would be your policy if you came into the power next election hopefully. And the, the, the recently four years before the article 370 was appropriated and even a portion leaders were restricted to visit and meet the people and how you see the future of Kashmir. Thank you. I mean our position on article 370 is very clear. It's in a resolution passed in the CWC of the congress party. I would urge you to take a look at that. Of course we are, we are for ensuring that every single person in our country has a voice, is allowed to express themselves. And we feel very strongly that Kashmir should develop, Kashmir should progress, and there should be peace in Kashmir. I just would like to know what are your next priorities, political priorities and what will be your world vision in the context of growing tensions. Thank you. What would be my, your view on international relations in a difficult context that we are now? I've been, I've been saying in all my meetings that it is pretty clear that China is proposing a particular view, a particular vision of the planet. And they are putting on the table the idea of the Belt and Road. And one of the reasons they are able to do that is because they have become a center of global production. And this is something I told the people yesterday in the external affairs office. But I don't see an alternative vision coming from our side. That, that vision requires a vision for production in a democratic environment. What the Chinese have basically shown is that it is possible to produce effectively in a coercive environment where you don't give people freedom, where you restrict their freedom, but you offer them prosperity without political freedom. And the challenge for us is can we provide an alternative vision where we do production under democratic conditions with political and economic freedom. And I think there's a lot of cooperation that can happen between the United States, between Europe and between us. And I think that's where a lot of our focus should go. How can we create an alternative to the Chinese production model that is a coercive production model? A competitive vision. What's contrary about it? I mean, they've decided not to invite the leader of the opposition. It tells you, it tells you something. I mean, it tells you that they don't value the leader of 60% of India's population. And, you know, it's something that people should think about. Why they are why they are feeling the need to do that. And what is the type of thinking that goes behind that? There was a 17-year-old boy who was shot in France and the French actually jailed about a thousand people just so that they even could go peacefully. And at the same time- I didn't realize that. And you tried to raise that issue. But there was no conversation on that in the platform. Instead, there was a lot of retaliation from the, you know, Indian ministries regarding the same that this should not be brought up. We were actually talking of freedom at that time in France. And I thought that that issue should have been brought up. But what do you think about that? Have you spoken about it here? About what? About the Manipur issue, the human rights issue that we're facing. Yeah. I mean, our position on Manipur was very clear. I actually visited Manipur. And I think we are very much for democratic rights, harmony, peace between people.  And I think there is a sense in India that the democratic structures of our country, the institutional structures of our country are under attack. And they're under attack from the group of people who are running India. I don't think this point is missed by anybody. I think everybody who has even a little bit of an understanding of India knows this. But of course, there are other considerations. So when, you know, when you're dealing with India these days, there are other considerations which are also important, as you would be well aware. The democratic fight and the fight for democracy in India is ours. And it's our responsibility. And we will take care of it. And we will make sure that the sort of onslaught on our institutions and our freedom is stopped. The opposition will make sure it happens. Do you want to speak in Hindi or English? You decide. You ask. Okay. The aim of the visit is to meet our diaspora here, to engage with them, to get a sense of what they're dealing with, what they're going through. That's one aspect. The second aim is to meet members of the government here, MPs, other people, and to get a sense of how they're seeing India, how they're seeing the possible cooperation between India and Europe, how they view India, what they think India should be doing, and also giving them a bit of a sense of what we think our relationship should look like. We can hear you, I think. I mean, of course, I would have to see the program before I could comment on whether it was exaggerated or not. So I don't know what that program was saying. But certainly there is an increase in discrimination and in violence in India. And there is a full-scale assault on the democratic institutions of our country. That is, that everybody knows. And internally in India it's been commented on and globally it's been commented on. And of course, minorities are under attack, but so are many other communities. Dalit communities, tribal communities, lower caste communities are also under attack. There is an attempt to change the nature of our country. Our country in the constitution is described as a union of states and we believe that the most critical aspect of our union is the conversation between members of our union. And there is an alternative vision, which is the BJP vision, which believes that power should be centralized, power should be concentrated, wealth should be concentrated, and the conversation between members of the union, between people of India should be suppressed. And so this is the fight between two visions. I like to term it the fight between Mahatma Gandhi's vision and Nathuram Ghotse's vision. Nathuram Ghotse being the person who assassinated our leader. Let's deal with one question at a time. So when we design these tours, we have a structure and the organizers decide whether we are going to have closed door meetings, whether we're going to have public meetings and stuff like that depending on the length of the tour and the type of place we're going to. So I guess in Belgium we sort of opted for a model. By the way, hundreds of people are coming and meeting us. And pretty much everybody in Belgium who of Indian origin knows exactly where I am and they've been coming and coming by droves to come and see me. But I think we decided that a full blown Indian style public meeting in Belgium might not be the best way to do it. I mean, the fact that Pegasus was on my phone is a known fact. I mean, I don't know the details of how I'm tracked, but I'm certainly tracked for sure. I met thousands and thousands of youngsters and all of them said exactly what you're saying. The three things they said. Number one, unemployment. Number two, huge increase in the levels of poverty and completely skewed income distribution. So few people getting very, very wealthy and the bulk of people being pushed back into poverty and then rising prices and inflation. Those were the three things that repeatedly they told me. The fact of the matter is that India has the highest unemployment that it's had in the last 40 years. So there is something clearly wrong with our economic model. It's not accepted. And there's a lot of media support for the government. So those type of things don't come out. But I don't think the current path we are on, economic path we are on is sustainable in any way. And there will certainly be consequences and a backlash to this model. Kashmir is of course an integral part of India. So it's nobody's business other than our own, other than India's business. Our position as I stated earlier is very clear. It's in a working committee resolution. We can give you a copy of that resolution if you're interested in reading it. But I feel that it's very important, you know, the general discussion we are having here that democratic institutions, democratic structures need to be protected in India and the voice of people needs to be defended and protected. And that goes for every single part of India, including Kashmir. We're now having a name change. Yes, is that happening? I don't know. You have to ask the prime minister. I mean, you know, these are these are, I am perfectly happy with the names that we have in our constitution. India that is Bharat works perfectly well for me. But I think these in a sense to me are panic reactions. There's a little bit of fear in the government. These are distraction tactics. We of course came out with the name India for our coalition. And it's a fantastic idea because it represents exactly who we are. We consider ourselves to be the voice of India. And so the word works very well. But it's obviously disturbed the prime minister enough that he wants to change the name of the country, which which is absurd. But that's what it is. It's also interesting that every time we raise the issue of Mr. Adani and crony capitalism, the prime minister comes out with some dramatic new diversion tactic. It's curious that just after I did a press conference on Adani, this entire diversion is put into place. It's interesting. Yes, ma'am. Yes. EU journalist. I don't know what time again. Thank you. In view of the COP28, the climate conference in Dubai, what are your expectations? And do you think that India is going to be the major spokesperson for the global south? Thank you. Well, I don't know. I mean, I think India has a relationship with the global south. And I think there are there are bonds there, historical bonds there that make us make us close to the global south. I don't know if we are the spokesman of the global south, but certainly we have a relationship with them on the environment. Of course, we are as a planet going through these large transitions, energy transition, transition in the way we move. And I think environment is a central issue for India. It's of course not in a country in a country where there are many poor people. It's difficult to make environment top of mind. But I think it is a critical issue. And it's very important that we think about it in a strategic and a long term way. Thanks. Brian Rick, it's representing the European coal industry. And I've enjoyed visits to European coal industry. And I've enjoyed visits to coal power plants and mines in India. And my hope for the future is a democratic India. And the question relates to that. As China developed very rapidly over the last few decades, its economy became imbalanced. And it's now paying the price for that, I believe. How would you ensure that India's economy doesn't become imbalanced? So how to balance the powers of a market-based economy versus central planning? I think one of the lessons that I learned in my walk was that there is an inherent and profound wisdom in the people of my country. Regardless of which part of society they're in. For example, we're discussing environment. The type of conversations I had with tribal people about the environment were far more sophisticated than I have with people living in cities. So there is an inherent wisdom in the people of India, and I'm sure in the people of Europe and people of Belgium. And I think it's critical for us that in decision-making, we listen to the voice and the intelligence of the people. And that's where we have a fundamental difference with the BJP. We value the voice of the people, we value the voice of poor people, we value the voice of all stakeholders. And we want to hold a conversation with stakeholders before we make decisions. It's sometimes slower, but in the long run, it works out much better. And that's really the conflict that is taking place in India. There of the view that you don't need to ask people, you just go ahead and slam everything through. But in our view, there's consequences. With regards to the public sector and the private sector, we are pretty clear that in key strategic areas, public sector should have a role. In education, in healthcare, public sector should provide a foundation. But in other spaces, private industry is probably a better tool to achieve most aims. That's one or two more. Quick. But you asked like, you asked four questions. You asked three or four questions. Please, thank you. Anybody else? Nobody else? Go ahead. I think the agenda that you're talking about, mostly what has been happening in the in the election manifestos usually, the manifestos of the parties, that's how the elections were initially fought or held, where parties came and spoke about the manifestos. Now, with all the changes that have happened in India, we know so many PSUs have been privatized or are on the verge of being privatized in India. How in case, in next year's elections, in case tables turn and we see the opposition and the alliance probably coming forward and running the country, how do you think those kind of changes that are so massive that have been happening can be corrected? The privatization of public sector units that has been happening in India, how do you actually rectify that? Because that has actually taken away employment of so many housewives. I mean, women like my mother would probably be a very good candidate for an SBI banking job, but a private sector will not necessarily employ a person of her age and will look for a more competitive growth. So I think that's where I see a lot of people will lose employment because of this in India and are doing that. How does this get rectified? Where we draw the line is the notion of crony capitalism. We don't have a problem with the private sector. We don't have a problem with the government sector. Where we draw the line is where one or two people start to financially control the whole country and where one or two people or three people are running everything. That's where our problem begins. There's another element to this which is that government policies in India have systematically attacked the backbone of our employment system. If you look at who gives employment in India, it's the small and medium industry that gives employment in India and demonetization and GST have devastated those structures. So it's a two-pronged attack that the government is carrying out. Number one, impose a huge transaction cost on all small and medium businesses and ensure that you build two or three monopolies, monopolists who control pretty much everything. So if you look at Mr. Adani, our problem with Mr. Adani is he controls the ports. He controls the airports. He controls agriculture. He controls grain silos. He has real estate. I mean he's everywhere and he's dominant everywhere. He controls cement. So we think that's counterproductive for the country and on one side they are pushing this very monopolistic capital and on the other side they're devastating the small and medium people from where we're going to get a job. That's why we're having an unemployment crisis. And the second part is where you require key services. Country like India requires the government to be involved in education. It requires the government to be involved in healthcare. And the idea that you can just privatize education and privatize healthcare, it devastates the poorest people because they simply do not have access to this. So they are hitting this from three or four sides and the solutions are pretty clear. I mean we would invest much more in health and education. We would protect small and medium businesses. We would try to build an economy where small and medium businesses transition to medium businesses and then to large businesses and then to massive businesses. If you look at our small and medium businesses almost none of them become big businesses. They remain small or they die. And that's because of policy. So you can change policies to ensure that you start building champions in these smaller and medium spaces and you can certainly invest much more in education and healthcare. I'm not saying there's no role for private businesses in education. There is. But the mainstay of any education system in a country like India has to be, it's a government responsibility. And the government can't just say okay, we are going to abrogate from this responsibility. So the things that can be done and need to be done are pretty clear. They're not complicated. And if you look at our last manifesto, I think we ironed out quite a few of these ideas. One of the other ideas that we have, which we've tested now, you can get a sense of how we think about these things by looking at our states. So if you look at the healthcare system in Rajasthan, that'll give you a good sense of what we are thinking in terms of healthcare for the country. If you look at our social programs in Karnataka, you get a sense of how we are thinking about social programs for the country. So we tend to run a pilot somewhere, see if it works, and then scale it out. And, you know, for example, Mandrega was such a case where we ran a small pilot, then we scaled it into a state and then we scaled it into the nation. We don't believe in, you know, these rash decisions where you suddenly demonetize the economy, or you suddenly impose a GST. We believe in seeding an idea, letting that idea grow, testing the idea, and then scaling it across. Chhattisgarh has some very good ideas on how to support farmers with minimum prices. Karnataka has our, you know, the sort of support that we're giving to women in Karnataka. That's some very interesting work that's going on. And in each one of our states, you can see the sort of type of ideas that we will use when we come to power. Last question. When you were talking to the parliamentarians, you said it was a conversation and you were informing them about sharing, you know, your reading of what's happening in India. And you have repeated here that, you know, there are problems back home when it comes to institutions and democratic structures. What was their response to you? Did they seem concerned? Did they seem... Yeah, they were very concerned. They were very concerned and they felt that there is a, they felt that there is an attempt to stifle the democratic structures of India, for sure. And I mean, they were very, very clear with us. You have more questions? I think I think I think I think five questions for one person is good enough. I mean, if you know. Thank you very much for your time. We really appreciate. Thank you, Raul. Thank you. Thank you very much. And we hope to see you again. We in touch. Thank you.


te a challenge given what we do. In the last operational year, we've found just over a thousand people through our programme, males. It's been challenging in respect of the programme's structure, six months' support in prison and six months' support post-liberation. That support in prison was quite challenging. Theresa Meadhurst's colleagues have been fantastic in supporting us and keeping contact with potential programme participants during the lockdown period. One of the most pleasing things during that period was to recognise that the things that were previously not seen as doable were all of a sudden doable. It's something that we should remember as we hopefully come out of the pandemic. There have been a lot of necessities in the mother of all invention. We managed to do things together that previously were difficult to do or weren't considered, particularly around the technology, etc. We've had a situation in the last operational year in a male context in the male estate where, say, over a thousand people have went through the programme. We've got a re-offending rate with those who have returned to custody within a year, which is 8.7 per cent. Over 90 per cent of our participants are not going on to re-offend the results in a custodial sentence. That's something that we need to look at more acutely in relation to the conversation today, in relation to victims. Fundamentally, what we're doing here is that it's a bit like vaccines. We're severely weakening or breaking the link between introductory criminality and the graduation to serious criminal offences, which Kate and others do in supporting the victims of that. It's been a challenge. There's no doubt about it, but we've managed to continue with support from prison service, with support from the Government to be able to support on liberation the people who are coming out even on their early release programme. What we were able to do was bring technology to the fore, bring partnership working to the fore in a way that hasn't really been in evidence previously, greater access to services and greater integration to services with local authorities, et cetera. It was a challenge, but what it did was it forced us to do the things that we were always able to do, but we'd never managed to do, as a collective. I think that's the overriding lesson for us, I think, on that. On the female estate, that's suffered the same sort of challenges across both areas. We're working partnership with Sacro and Apex and they're fantastic partners on that. Again, the same issues are prevalent there also. On employment, I don't have the figures on the female for employment, but in the male estate you're looking at roughly between 10 and 15 per cent of those who get through the programme successfully. We're able to find employment for it, but that's because we're able to cross integrate programmes, existing programmes that are in place across different directorates of Government. Again, that's something that we need to look at and how we design and bake in that approach at the beginning and not have disparate programmes running almost contrary to each other in terms of the successful outcomes. Thank you for that. Just very briefly, can I ask you, do you have an approximate gender breakdown of the people that you help, male to female, what the ratio for that is? As I say, there's over a thousand on programme male-wise and there is much less, I think it's maybe 1 to 20 or 1 to 15. I'll get the exact figures, I'll get the committees exact figures and send them through to you, but it's much less because there's a much lower number of females versus males in the estate, so it's much less, but we'll get you the exact ratio. That would be helpful. Thank you very much. Just watching time slightly against us, so I'm just finally going to bring in Katie Clark. I think that you've got a question around criminal injuries compensation. As you will know, responsibility for compensation to victims of crime and the criminal injury compensation scheme was devolved to the Scottish Parliament a number of years ago, but the Scottish Government continued with the Westminster Criminal Injury Compensation Scheme. I was wanting to ask Kate Wallace what her experiences of that scheme were and how well she feels that that works for victims. Thank you. We are really keen to see the outcome of the consultation and the review that seems to have been really delayed. That was over a year ago now, I think, where we put forward a number of recommendations for improvement to the scheme. Reduction in the amount of waiting times, one of the experiences that we have, for example, as I mentioned earlier on in our service for families bereaved by murder and culpable homicides, is that they often experience a really lengthy delay in a criminal injuries compensation payment for funerals. That can be really difficult for families. Nobody is expecting a murder in the family if people don't have funeral plans. Being able to pay for a funeral up front can be a real challenge for families, but there is often a really lengthy delay. We feel that the scheme and the way it is laid out itself, where the conduct of the victim of the crime is being taken into account, is really unfair. That needs to be fundamentally looked at. What that can often mean is that payments are not made, although I am aware that the criminal injuries compensation authority try not to delay, but sometimes it means that they are waiting until the end of court proceedings before they are paying out so that they have an answer to the question about whether or not they are accused the victim is involved. At some point, as I say, for murder and culpable homicides, it is the families that are bearing the cost of that, so that seems really unfair. We submitted a large number of recommendations on improvement to the scheme that we are still awaiting the outcome of. That is very helpful. I know that we are short of time, but if you would want to share anything in writing with the committee, that would be really appreciated. I am just going to bring things to a close, but before I do so, I believe that Superintendent Convary, you have perhaps been able to find some information that Ms Mackay was referencing earlier on. Is that correct? Yes, that is correct. If I am writing, I am just confirming Ms Mackay the question surrounding domestic abuse protection orders. Yes, that is correct. Thank you, Ms Mackay. My apologies for not being able to answer the time when I did not feel that it was appropriate to give half an answer. The position and defence are that we are supporting the Government's implementation board with domestic abuse protection orders. In fact, Sam Forbes, who is on this morning, sits on the implementation board for that, or Sporys sits in the working group for that to work towards delivering something that we support. We absolutely recognise that it has got to be done carefully and carefully to make sure that it is delivered safely for victims in particular. I hope that that gives you what you need. I am not sure all that the time over at something we are at to the working with the stakeholders on to deliver. Thank you so much for coming back with that. That is really appreciated. Thank you very much. As ever, time is against us, but that has been a really informative and helpful discussion. As ever, if any of our witnesses today feel that there are outstanding points that you would like to share with the committee, I very much invite you to follow that up in writing and we will take your evidence into account. On behalf of the committee, a big thank you to all our witnesses attending today. We will now move on to our next agenda item, which is consideration of two Scottish statutory instruments that are subject to the negative procedure. I refer members to paper number six. Do any members have any comments or questions firstly on the Sexual Offences Act 2003, prescribed police stations Scotland amendment number two regulations of 2021, and that is SSI 282 of 2021? Do any members have any comments or questions on the prisons and young offenders institutions, coronavirus Scotland amendment number two rules of 2021, and that is SSI 289 of 2021? I would probably like to get more information on that, convener, on the role that the inspector at our plane in terms of some of the human rights in the extension, so if that is possible, we could get more information from the cabinet secretary and whoever else is involved in that. I echo comments by Stevenson and I would welcome more information. I note that what seems like a minor negative instrument is extending by a significant period of time, some significant powers that governors in our prison services and young offenders institutions have, with the ability, for example, to confine prisoners to themselves for a prolonged period of times to restrict activity, suspend prison visits and curtail work educational activities, counselling and professional activities for another six months. I do appreciate that this is perhaps linked to the extension of other Covid regulations that were debated in the wider chamber and other pieces of legislation, but I would say that I would find unacceptable that in point nine of the consultation it says that the SPS intends to publish the consultation responses received of which they weren't all positive, I should add, and its response to the consultation on its website in October, but these powers run out at the end of September and we're been asked to approve their extension prior to the publication of the consultation and their response, which I find wholly unacceptable. I would expect that either the Minister for Community Safety or whoever is presenting the SSI to at least give us some more information on what concerns have been raised throughout the consultation process so that the members can take a view as to the suitability of the extension of the powers that are being asked by the SPS or indeed by the Government. Thank you very much for that. I'll bring in Ms Barre, just to outline next steps. Yes, so the committee can look at this negative SSI again next week, so in the meantime we can write to the Scottish Prison Service, to the Cabinet Secretary and to the inspector about the concerns that you've raised and you can look at the responses hopefully next week. Okay, thank you very much. As Ms Stevenson and Mr Greene have raised some questions for which it would be valuable to have some answers, I propose to hold off agreeing the prisons and young offenders institutions, Corona, Scotland amendment number two rules of 2021, until our next meeting next week. Are we all agreed? Thank you very much. No member has indicated that they have any comments on the first of our SSIs, which is the one relating to sexual offences. That being the case, are members content formally not to make any comments to the Parliament on this instrument? That completes consideration of the two negative instruments and we'll now move into our private session.


Hello and welcome to this talk. My name is Dr. George Liu and it's very good to be here in Zandam today. I was a resident of Zandam. I lived right by the fairies. My area of research is mobility. Now part of my research was on the bike train journey. So figuring out I came here to study cycling but I also fell in love with the train system, right? Because it's also I know you all like to hate on NS whenever it's late. But in the global context it is rather a remarkable system with just a few exceptions but we all love to complain about the exceptions, right? So first some fundamentals. You can recognize this. This is right behind the Amstel station in Amsterdam but normally if you visit elsewhere in the world there might be a few bike parking spaces in Canada where I grew up, you know what surrounds the train station is a giant parking lot, right? Because everyone drives so you drive to the train station as well. So this forms a remarkable addition to the system, a feeder system that gets people on their bike from door to door, right? Via the train system, right? And that's what makes it possible to live without a car. So I enjoy showing this graphic, right? It's about the Netherlands and the Rijnstad in context. So this puts the Rijnstad in context and I would argue the Rijnstad is part of the Rijnstad and therefore you're part of the dense train system. So if you were to focus actually on the Rijnstad itself, it's actually quite compact, right? And you can see that if you were to look at the densest part of the Netherlands then it is actually quite a smaller area than even Los Angeles or New York. And you have an excellent train system to complement that area. Not to say and also an excellent cycling network, right? So this is what you have. So each line, as you know, would have two hour service, so half an hour daily train service. So if you were to look at the combined frequencies, it's actually better than some metro systems. For example, I came from Rotterdam today and off peak hours, the Rotterdam metro in the evening, some of the lines only run every 20 minutes, right? Whereas here you pretty much get every 15 minutes, every 10 minutes during the peak hour, right? So it's a remarkable system. It's a train network that offers a metro like frequency. And that's the key to making the bike train system works, right? And you can see here clearly, so this is the four big cities and we are up here somewhere, right? And we can see the hotspots where many trains depart. So who came to the Zandam main station? Anyone did that? Yes. What was the reason for that? Other than maybe you work to go to the office, not here, yeah. So I came directly here and I had the choice of two stations, right? They had the intercity and the sprinters all the way up to then Helder, that was a branch. And then the other branch had less trains going, but it was a closer walk, right? Or I could have went to Zandam and took an Obeyfeats and I would have gotten here in the same amount of time, right? So it's about providing these options. So you're all very familiar with how bikes work and how trains work. But as part of a system, this is kind of the concept. So you're your home and you're trying to get to work. But your train station isn't outside your door. It's generally a bit of a walk away and you have some options here, right? So you want to get from here to here in the fastest way, because you know this is the quickest connection and basically the options. What's interesting is between these two branches, right? Do you take the metro? Do you take the bus? Do you walk or do you take the bike or in extreme cases in a small town? Maybe there's a parking lot where you drive to a sprinter station. And this is a remarkable system because the trains run on a schedule, right? Every ten minutes, every 30 minutes. If you miss a train, the next one doesn't come until the next one comes. If you fail to get on your bike, your bike is still there waiting for you, right? So that's what I mean when I talk about flexibility. This might not come as a surprise, but 47% of all trips going to the train station is by bike, right? And we have less going to the work side. Your office is actually quite close to the train station, so many development principles there try and put workspaces. You see this in Utec station, you see it here. Workstaces close to the train station, because that generates a lot more trips. Ideally, you just make one leg of the trip by bike, and then the other end, you can walk. But if you can't walk, that's where the Ove Feet system comes in, or for those occasional trips. So, most people have a bike at home, I hear more than one per person, take it to the train station, no problem, but this part presents more of a problem. So this is the interesting problem, but we have an interesting solution. And here is kind of how we can conceptualize. The nearest train station to here today is within walking distance, right? If I were to go to Zandam, which has more frequency, more intercity services, maybe I'm going to the 3.5 kilometer range by bike. And then by e-bike, now you can't even go further, right? So we're looking at 15 minute radiuses, and if you were to go to a train station even further than that, not willing to cycle, then you have other options available to you. So this is within a chart form, more academic for you, okay? So we have a few lines, we have walking and bike and car. So basically, why would you choose to walk instead of taking your bike on the home side if you have a bike available to you? So we combine all of this, and we see that at some point, right, you make some choices here. So you can choose to walk to the train station. If you have a car, you can choose to drive or take car share. And then as researchers, we can look at all of this data at these crossing points, right? Where we have distance versus travel time, and we can think in terms of optimization, right? If you're thinking, okay, I want the shortest amount of time, which mode do I take? This is kind of the math that goes into your head. So if you're looking at walking to the train station, for example, you would take a walking line, and then you would intercept this theoretical train, and you would get on the train and go, right? If you're taking a bike, it takes you less time to get to the train, then you would intercept it at a lower time before you start your journey. So what I'm trying to illustrate is it takes more time to unlock your car, get in the car than it takes to ride a bike.  So you start your journey, but your journey is much slower. So what I'm trying to show here is that if you walk and take the train, then the time it takes to get your train part of the journey started could be 20 minutes or 25 minutes, right? The same journey, if you chose to, or three. Yeah, so theoretically, same distance. This is just trying to show that if you were to take a bike, you decrease that, but the train part of the journey is very quick, right? So we're focusing on the door to train station journey. And then in terms of costs, right, when it comes to the municipality, when it comes to NS, when it comes to the government, how do you spend on infrastructure, right? So this is where we have the last mile problem, that it's much cheaper to move a large amount of people from point A to point B in terms of public transport than it is to have, like, 30 different bus lines that come every half an hour. And no one is happy with those 30 different bus lines, right? So by combining cycling and the train, we're able to concentrate more of the ridership between two big stations. And then that means that we don't have to worry as much or provide less service to areas that don't have access to a bus, or a stop right outside their door, right? So it's an optimization problem, of course, you may choose to provide more bus service as well, but at least with a cycling network, it gives you that opportunity to make these travel investment decisions. So this is going to be a bit of an exercise for you. I'm going to ask you to pull out your phone. Has anyone heard about isochrones? So isolated time over geography. So think of this as if you went to Amsterdam Central Station and you plotted the different places you can get to by train and you figured out what is the boundary of 30 minutes by public transit, right? And then you plot it on the map and all the red areas show you 30 minutes by public transit. Now we're going to try with this app, hopefully it works better on the computer, but you can also try it on your phone. The layers might not work well, but you can get one. So basically the exercise now for you is from where you live, right? I would like you to figure out what your travel boundaries are. And we can start with cycling as a mode. Cycling, you have your map, right? Okay, what do you have? You were to describe the shape, what shape do you have? Round, right? You might have a circle, might be jaggedy, there might be a river. And that's the general shape, it makes sense because when you're cycling, there's no stations to get to, right? Walking is about the same, but smaller, makes sense, because you're walking slower than cycling. And then driving, maybe a bit longer along the highways. And then what's interesting about this app, you can play with it later, is that it also adjusts the area dynamically. So if you pick rush hour, your driving circle gets quite a bit slower. That's one of the things that's really cool that we can do as researchers, interacting with GIS, geographical information systems, and maps. And we can find detailed information like this. So this'll be my final point then, on this exercise, is in 2015, 2013, a few geographers got together and came up with this theory of urban fabrics, right? And this theory of urban fabrics outlines, you have your walking fabric in the middle. So imagine you're starting in the city center, right? So you have two kilometers walking within 15 minutes. You have your transit fabric, which you see, you might recognize the dots. This is a historical story, right? This map is a historical map. And then later, when the automobile came around, what happened? Right, so then you get access to all this in between, right? This is now all open for development. And remarkably, this is also the story of many Dutch cities. So what you get in the Rijnstad is actually something quite similar to this diagram, and when it comes to planning this community, right? I think there's a lot of ways to take advantage of this type of urban development thinking, right? You have three train stations available to you within biking distance, but you also have competition, and the competition is also the two highways that are surrounding this neighborhood, right? So there's a choice to be made. And when you move in as a new resident and you're thinking, how do I get to work, right? Because it's easier to convince new residents to make a travel choice. It's easier to convince them before they buy the car to take the train. Once they buy the car, the economics of it all changes, right? So to these new residents, how do you convince them to make their decisions in a way that favors a cycling and train system? And how do you convince them to stay away from the highway system, which is a much more expensive resource, right? And I hope through this exercise you've seen some different ways that people can make their decisions. There's gotten you to think about practically here how people can move to these three train stations, a minor station, a slightly bigger station with inter-cities and sprinters, and then a much larger station in Zandam, which has many more trains, but you have to bike a bit further to get there, right? And what's missing from this conceptual diagram and from your maps is the power of cycling, because once you have these tiny circles that become much larger circles, you can capture many more people into the train system and make it a much more attractive option. And how do we make campaigns and actions and deliberate choices to highlight this possibility? But then you take e-bikes and the possibilities become even larger, right? So if you can ride even faster to the train station, where does that unlock? For this area, maybe not much, but say if you're living five, six kilometers out, maybe that's what it takes as an e-bike to help you shift to this other mode of community.


Whether you're a fan of her or not, lately we've been hearing a lot from Miley Cyrus. The star always seems to stay relevant, but recently it's been a ton about her divorce from long time on and off again man Liam Hemsworth. I can't lie that this split is a little bit heartbreaking, I was a fan of the couple, but I think a lot of it had to do with Miley's transformation or so they say. Miley got her start with Disney and we knew her as the daughter of Billy Ray Cyrus and soon as her character Hannah Montana, which brought her mega fame. Miley auditioned for Hannah Montana when she was only 11 years old, so she was just a little kid when she started on the hit Disney show. Fast forward to the time of this video and Miley is 26 years old, turning 27 in November, so it's no doubt a ton has changed with all that time passed. Miley has 98.6 million followers on Instagram at the time of this recording, so we know that she has a ton of fans following her every move, including me. Although it would seem that Miley has been through a lot of phases already over the course of her career, it's only natural for a person to evolve and find themselves. Maybe she isn't the same good girl from Disney we once knew, but is it really that surprising? Miley has become more open and not afraid to be who she is. She seems to embrace her uniqueness and even her sexuality. She claims to be more fluid in that department these days, but I'll talk more about that after. Today we're going to focus on Miley and take a look at how she's really transformed over the years. We know that she went from having a good, a girl's next door style way back, to more of a grown-up, and then through some more wild phases. What's going on guys and girls, my name is Kara and this series we have titled Before and After. Today we're going to look at Miley, any cosmetic work the star may have had done, her body and fitness, and just her overall transformation and phases over the years. I've done other celebrity transformation videos including ones on Dove Cameron and Ariana Grande and we'll have links to those at the end of this video. I've also been reading all your comments and I'm going to be responding to some at the end of this. As always, if there's anyone else who want me to document, let me know in the comments down below. Now let's get into this video. We'll start with Miley's face. Personally, I've always thought that she was gorgeous and had a unique look at the same time, so I don't think she's ever needed to change much with her appearance. The main thing we know that Miley changed about her face is her smile. When Miley was a kid actress, the girl still loved to show off her smile which was super cute and gave her a really positive energy. Her teeth weren't perfect though which is pretty normal especially when you're young. Her smile showed her gums more and her teeth were a lot more uneven than they are these days. Even if you're only a child actor, the public will still find things in your appearance to constantly pick on. Whether it was something Miley's always wanted to get fixed or just for a confidence boost, she fixed her smile around 2007 which was still early in her career. From the looks of it, Miley probably got veneers, a little bit of her shaping to her gums as well as teeth whitening. Whatever she did, I think her smile looked amazing and gave her even more confidence. And even these days, it's just as white and perfect. Also in 2007, if you look closely, you can actually see Miley's nose looks different too. I never really thought that Miley got a nose drop but once I heard, I couldn't unsee it. The more I see before and after photos of celebs, I realize how common nose drops actually are in Hollywood. Miley's nose looked wider before and although it still suited her face and was small in my opinion, it did look different. From a plastic surgeon's opinion, Dr. Amar Khan had said Miley's nose. The top looks as though it's been refined as it was a little bulbous before and her nostrils appear to have been narrowed. Looking at Miley's nose after, it does sound about right and it definitely seems sleeker and more petite. Sometimes it's more noticeable than others. Aside from Miley's smile and nose, I believe that the rest is all natural. Like I said before, it seems that she didn't need to do much because she's always had a naturally great look. The subtle cosmetic work that Miley probably had done just made her even cuter. Let's move on to Miley's body. Standing at around 5'4", she wouldn't be considered tall but she would definitely be considered super fit. I have no doubt that Miley's body is all natural but it looks like she works hard for it. She also isn't afraid to show it off in flaunt it. Even last month posting a flood of vacation bikini pics on IG, just around the time her split from Liam was surfacing. When I saw those pics, I just thought that Miley looked amazing as usual and maybe even more so. It's clear to me that Miley hasn't had any work done on her body because everything is proportionate to her shape. She's also addressed this in the past if people have asked. Her boobs and figure are noticeably real when you see photos and Miley does have nude photo shoots that she did in the past which are all over the internet. So if you're not convinced, you can look at those but we're keeping it PG here. So what are her secrets? Well first of all, I'm pretty sure Miley's diet is really strict. Shate magazine reported a few years ago, the young actress is also gluten intolerant and her nutritionist keeps both gluten and dairy out of her diet to keep those abs looking good. She started that back in 2012 and is apparently both gluten and lactose intolerant. So that's no gluten, no dairy and we also know that Miley is a vegan. She's a self-proclaimed animal lover and made the choice to go vegan back in 2014 stating, by not consuming animal products over the years, I've protected myself from preventable diseases. So she steers clear of meat, fish, dairy which we all knew and eggs. She's all plant-based. Sources also say that although Miley has done drugs in the past and used to party more, that as of 2017 she quit drinking, smoking and drugs cold turkey. But the next year she had given up the sober lifestyle around the end of 2018. Miley is open about it though and from what I know she prefers smoking weed most of the time and does it on her downtime. Diet isn't the only thing that keeps Miley lean and gives her solid abs.  Miley started Pilates back in 2013 and used to even go to classes daily at one point. She even has the Pilates equipment in her own home where we know that she does plenty of exercises and workouts too. Pilates isn't all though, Miley also loves yoga. Sources say that she tries to practice at home for two hours a day, six days a week. Apparently the style of yoga that Miley likes best is Ashtanga which focuses on specific breathing patterns and poses and in the same order each time. Now take your feet and take them on each side of your hand. Nothing you haven't seen before folks. And now put your hands behind you, flip them like this, flip in and reverse it and now sit down and they'll sit your legs straight out. No I can't sit down. Okay well that's that. That's the end of that. Yoga and Pilates are both great workouts and not just for the body but the mind as well. So whatever Miley is doing it's working. And if any of you guys wanted to try out Miley's diet and fitness routine there's totally others online who have done the same thing. But I'm not sure they lasted long. So I think that Miley is one of those celebrities that we've seen change the most drastically over the years. A lot of why Miley changed isn't because she got any plastic surgery or lost weight or changed her body. It's mostly been her image and her style as a whole. So that's what we're gonna look at next. Miley started off as this innocent child star just like many of them do. Just a cute brunette who always loved to smile and we knew was Hannah Montana. We grew to love her and the character and Miley saw a lot of success with this image. She still broke free of Hannah Montana and grew up while still looking like herself. Think party in the USA times. Mind us that one weird time in 2008 where Miley was still a teen and posed topless for vanity fair. Also including a photo with her dad. But Miley was a pretty good girl. Miley told Marie Claire about breaking free from Hannah Montana. I was told for so long what a girl's supposed to be from being on that show. From the time I was 11 it was you're a pop star. That means you have to be blonde and you have to have long hair and you have to put on some glittery tight thing. I was made to look like someone that I wasn't which probably caused some body dysmorphia because I had been made pretty every day for so long and then I wasn't on that show I was like who the F am I? Despite Miley becoming an adult and releasing some sexier music and partying more nothing could prepare us for the Miley phase coming next which was when she really changed. Then came Miley's album Bangers. This era sometime in 2012 was something else and it was when we realized that Miley wasn't holding back any longer. She cut off all her hair and bleached it which was a totally new look to say the least. Miley's music was more party focused referencing drugs and stuff and she was definitely showing off her sexuality. Come 2013 MTV VMAs and Miley was in her underwear twerking on Robin Thicke on stage. Also whatever happened to that guy? Aside from all the twerking Miley was clearly experimenting with drugs at the time and participating in some nude photo shoots like I mentioned. In fact just recently addressing her Liam's split Miley posted some words on IG talking about her past which included her saying she advocated for weed, experimented with drugs and that there are probably more nudes of her on the internet than maybe any woman in history. At least the girl is honest but I don't think that's true because I can think of women with way more nudes than her. At the time and moving past it closer to 2015-2016 Miley was giving off total hippie vibes. The star was clearly still advocating marijuana and being herself, loving her animals and in my opinion starting to look much cuter than her wild face. But aside from the weed loving I obviously got hippie vibes from Miley because she was getting talked about for flaunting her armpit hair. I mean she was posting pics on IG and showing up to award shows with it so it's no secret. I don't know how long this phase lasted but I for one am glad it's over. Even though Miley's been looking gorgeous and glam again for the last few years she still kept her carefree attitude. Around the time she released Malibu she started being a thick girlier again while still maintaining her edge. I love the look that Miley has right now which is probably dressing however she feels like at the moment but her hair is longer and blonde again and it looks great. I guess that Miley's phases weren't really phases though because she seems to be pretty sure about who she is these days. Miley's still very open with her sexuality which she claims is fluid.  What I preach is people fall in love with people not gender not looks and whatever. What I'm in love with exists on almost a spiritual level it has nothing to do with sexuality. Well that's pretty straightforward I guess. Miley basically transformed before our eyes from Hannah Montana Disney star to while in crazy party girl to the Miley we know today which seems to me like a balance of everything. I actually think out of young celebrities she's one who's changed the most in a short amount of time. What was your favorite Miley phase? I would love to know and tell me in the comments. Okay guys so it's time for me to read out some of your comments from past videos. This comment was from Nina I on our before and after video of Catherine from the ace family. Honestly it's her decision what she's doing even if she doesn't want to admit some things it's her life. I still like her so it doesn't matter. Very true Nina and it's all just speculation too. Either way I think she looks great. A lot of you definitely thought I was shaming Catherine in that vid or being a hater but I don't think anything bad about her at all. She looks great especially for a mom of two. And also on that video at Lisa commented saying Thank you that's what I'm saying. All these rumors are already out there online anyways. Raar also commented on one of our recent vids saying Thank you so much and we'll keep making them. I'm glad you're enjoying them. Alright guys and girls that wraps up this video here and before and after. If you want to talk more about Miley's transformation you can hit me up on Instagram. Let me know who else you would like me to make a before and after video on and I'll see you guys in the next video. Bye.


The Equitable Life Assurance Society presents, This Is Your FBI. This Is Your FBI. The official broadcast from the files of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Presenter transcribed as a public service by the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and the Equitable Society's representative in your community. Self-reliant citizens living in their own mortgage-free homes are the cornerstone of a free country. That is why of all the manifold services rendered by the Equitable Society to nearly 6 million people, one which ranks near the top in importance, is the Equitable's Assured Home Ownership Plan. In about 14 minutes, Mr. Keating will be back to tell you homeowners about the Equitable Society's famous Assured Home Ownership Plan. Tonight, the subject of our FBI file, Bank theft. It's title, The Penny Lender. This coming Sunday, February the 18th, marks the beginning of Crime Prevention Week. Its purpose is to call attention to the alarming fact that in this country, almost 5,000 major crimes are committed every day. That's more than 200 every hour, more than three every minute. The problem is made more difficult because as fast as the FBI and local law enforcement agencies succeed in putting seasoned criminals behind bars, new recruits step in to swell the criminal ranks. As fast as some go straight, others go wrong. In tonight's case from official files of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, you will see where these recruits come from. Some are previously law-abiding citizens who succumb to temptation. Others are borderline cases hovering on the fringes of the underworld and finally decide to cross the border into crime. Tonight's FBI file opens in a narrow alley just off Skid Row in a mid-western city. Ragged men sit in clusters leaning against the brick walls. Some sleeping, others trying to get one more drop from an empty bottle. In their midst is a neatly dressed elderly man with a small notebook in his hand. As he looks around, one of the derelicts rises and approaches. Morning, Mr. Page. Well, how are you this fine day, Twink? Oh, broke. Naturally. Nobody ever comes to see me when they're solvent. Can I have some money? Now, let me examine my records. I paid you back last time. Alan Bentley Carson, and here's your page, Twink.  October 9th, paid off. December 13th, paid. Yeah, Twink, your account balances. So here's your loan. 60, 70, 75 cents. Oh, thanks, Mr. Page. Thanks a lot. You're welcome. All right, now, anyone else here who needs a small sum to tide them over, no security, just a friendly loan. Use the money for a week. Julia Page. Well, that's right. My name's Fred Stewart. I was sent to see you. But now you don't need references. I can tell it on his face when I see one. My limit for a loan is $2. Shylock, huh? Mr. Stewart, I'm a banker. You wish to borrow? No. And what is it you want? I hear you know every bum down here. Well, that's probably true. I know how you can make yourself three bills. $300? Mm-hmm. Mr. Stewart, there are limits to my scruples. This is legit. Mr. Page. Now, just a minute, Twink, go on, Mr. Stewart. My uncle Charlie hit the row, and I'd like to find him. Here's his picture. Well, uh, a patrician face. You know him? Well, I glimpsed his tragic features occasionally. He's what the men call a loner. Where is he? He mentioned a sum of money. It's in my pocket. Well, I'll take a down payment of a third. You got it. Consider me and your employee. The other deuce is yours when you come up with it. Now, there's a foul-smelling hamburger house near here called Slim's. Yeah, down the block. Yeah, there are tables there in the rear. You seat yourself at one, and I'll join you there in an hour. Mr. Stewart. I thought I'd grab a sandwich till you came. Oh, no, no, no. Put it back on the plate, sir. A man who runs this place thinks the pure food law is a myth. Yeah, that's better. Now, your business. You got some wood? I found them. Where? Mr. Stewart, I'm not reflecting on your character, but you're forgetting my fee. Tell me, and I'll pay. Now, I have a peculiar malady. Only one thing loosens my tongue. Money. I suppose you come up with a wrong joker. Mr. Stewart. I took a flyer giving you the yard before. This time you take the chance. That's your last word? Yeah. All right, sir. Farewell. Hold it. Here. One, 150. All right, now talk. Yeah. Your dear uncle resides at the Star Hotel in Room 19. I'll go see him right away. Today at the local FBI field office, Special Agent Jim Taylor approaches the desk of Agent Walter Emory. Morning, Walt. Oh, hi, Jim. He's a present. Another case? Thanks. Frank Johnson was on it with me before he's transferred. What's it about? A few months ago, bank examiners found the Broadway National Books on the short side. How much? 37,000. The day the examiner showed up, the teller named Glenn Fillmore disappeared. Convenient. We kept a surveillance on his apartment friends, but we never got anything. The money turned up? No, we didn't have any serial numbers, but we sent Fillmore's picture to every bank. As far as we know, he never opened an account or rented a safe deposit box anywhere. Sure, sure. A bookmaker. I don't think so this time. Fillmore was on the frugal side. Was? Yeah, the police just called. His body's been found in a room at the Star Hotel. The only star I know is on Skid Row. That's the one. He was living there in the name of Charlie Jones. Well, that money went fast. Well, maybe not, Walt. He was murdered and there was no sign of any cash in the room. Oh, you want to examine the room with me? Oh, sorry, Jim. I've got an appointment. All right. If you get a chance, will you read up on the file? I'll check with you later. Mr. Stewart, your usual table? Yeah, this way, please. This one will do. Very good, sir. Blind list? Thanks. Did you see our friend? The job's done. Anything in his room? I threw what he had in a bag. Your girl in the check room. The sarturn is excellent, sir. Yes. When you go to the check room, there'll be an envelope in your overcoat. I had 300 expenses. For what? Finding him. Vicki told you he was on Skid Row. It's a big street. I paid a guy to locate him. You got 2,000 for the job. Plus expenses. Okay. Before I go for it, I want to see what I'm buying. I'll be right back. I'll be waiting. Vicki. Vicki, have you dipped into the bag yet? Just now. I found the receipt for a package. Here. Thanks. Village warehouse, October 4th. That's the day he took it on the L-A-M from the bank. So this receipt has to be for the package of dough. Yeah. Well, one way to find out, I'll claim it first thing in the morning. What'd he call me? Oh, no, Jim. Well, Fillmore's hotel room is cleaned out, but the porter told me somebody asked this morning how to find room 20. Was that Fillmore's? No, he had number 19. But it could have been the killer playing cute. 20's been empty for a week. Get any description? Yeah, but not a very good one. Port as a police headquarters now going over pictures for us. I'm sorry I haven't cracked that file yet, but I had an idea on it. You said Fillmore wasn't a type to gamble. How about women? No. Now he was a confirmed bachelor, too. The only evidence we uncovered about a girl showed he'd gone out a few times with somebody named Vicki Ogden. Who's she? Works in the hat check room at the Club Romeo. Great place for a bank teller's girl. Yeah, we thought so, too. So we worked on that angle for weeks, but it all added up to zero. Anybody checking her recently? Just two weeks ago. She still lives in the same hotel. She's kept a job. She doesn't outspend her salary. Oh, I'll get one. Special Agent Taylor. Captain Kerry at headquarters, Taylor. Yes, Captain. That porter making eye dents yet? Six of them. He what? He's picked out pictures of six different men. Oh, who are they? I've got a messenger on his way over with the pictures, and I'm putting every man's record on the teletype. Well, thanks, Captain. I'll get under the wire room now and catch him as they come in. Excellent shot, Mr. Stewart. I haven't seen a cue handled so deftly in years. Aren't you out of your neighborhood, Mr. Page? Huh? Oh, possibly. I've been looking for you. Why? I wanted to tell you how badly I felt about your uncle Charlie being shot. Oh? Yeah. Having it happen right after I told you where he was living, that was really a coincidence. Say, have you seen the late papers? Seems your uncle Charlie was really somebody named Glenn Fillmore. Papers say Mr. Fillmore embezzled $37,000. Never shown up. This money wasn't in his room when he was found. Miss Cue, didn't you? Look, why don't you get out of here? Oh, I haven't finished, Mr. Stewart. Now, I did a bit of research on you this afternoon. I come up with some interesting figures. According to my informant, you made a specialty of arranging for obituaries to appear. Like, or to be blunter, you kill people. Now, wait a minute.  You do it for money. You only do it when someone pays you. Now, the specific reason for my visitors to find out who hired you to kill Fillmore. Look, all this talk bothers me. Mr. Stewart, now, if you leave, I might have to contact the police or pass on what I know to them. Huh? Yeah. Besides, you wouldn't want to leave that eight-ball dangling in such a tempting fashion just above the corner pocket. Why? Oh, no, no, hold on. Uh, in case you're thinking of applying your trade on me, I want you to know that I have planted lettuce in various places, stating that if I shouldn't appear tomorrow morning, it'll be because of you. Oh. Now, pick up your cue and chalk it. That's it. Now, Mr. Stewart will become confidential, having a fairly accurate knowledge of current markets. I'd say you got $2,000 for the killing. Is that right? About right. My dear boy, that's cooly labor. Well, from now on, I'm your friend, your advisor, and your partner. And whoever that client was, it's about to learn that $2,000 wasn't your fee, but merely the first installment. Now, concentrate, son, and pocket that eight-ball. We will return in just a minute to tonight's exciting case from the official file which shows how your FBI helped promote America's security. Now, a special message for the heads of the families who are interested in mortgages on their homes. Do you know when a mortgage meets all the requirements of a truly modern plan? To qualify as truly modern, a plan must include two main elements. First, a painless method for paying off the mortgage years ahead of time. Second, emergency protection for you and your family against foreclosure and disaster. Today, many thousands of American families have plans like that in the equitable society's famous assured home ownership plan. Of all homeowners, only a select group can qualify for this money-saving home-saving plan. Here are the four special benefits they get. First benefit, this plan provides a painless way to pay off the mortgage years ahead of schedule. Here's the secret. This plan combines a low-cost first mortgage with life insurance protection. The insurance element creates a cash loan fund which increases steadily. Each year, the mortgage grows smaller and the cash loan fund bigger. After about 14 years, my equitable representative pointed out that my cash loan fund had grown big enough to clear off the whole 20-year mortgage. What a happy day that was. Second benefit, the cash loan fund is a friend in need when sickness or unemployment threaten home security. Last year, there was a slump in my business and I was out for three months. My cash loan fund helped plenty in meeting our mortgage payments. Third benefit, if the owner dies, his widow doesn't inherit a mortgage. She inherits her home free and clear. What's more, the equitable society not only cancels the mortgage, but also returns to the widow every cent her husband had paid to reduce the principal. Lastly, the mortgage draws interest, not at six, not at five, but at 4%, and closing costs are low. Naturally, a plan like this can't be offered to everyone.  Or write care of this station to the Equitable Society. That's E-Q-U-I-T-A-B-L-E. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States. And now back to the FBI file, the penny lender. Undoubtedly, the criminals you have met in tonight's case from the FBI files strike you as thoroughly bad specimens of the human race. But remember, nobody is born all bad or all good. What brings evil to the forefront? For one thing, crime breeds ununhappiness.   Parents who openly and obviously favor one child over another make the unhappy homes from which juvenile delinquents, the criminals of tomorrow are recruited. Correction of poverty is a long-time process. Correction of unhappiness in youth is something we can tackle without any delay. Right now, there are any number of fine organizations in this field. The Scouts, the various boys and girls clubs sponsored by religious groups and many other movements to help underprivileged children. These organizations go right down to the grassroots of crime prevention. They get the kids together for sports and wholesome group activities. They teach American ideals. They have helped transform thousands of potential delinquents into good citizens. If you are seriously interested in doing something about crime in crime prevention week, remember these organizations. They need your help. They can use your time. They deserve your support. Tonight's file continues the following day in front of the building housing the local FBI field office. Major agent Jim Taylor meets agent Walter Emmerich as he waits to cross the street. Hi, Walt. Hello, Jim. Say, I finished that other case, so I'm available. Yeah, that's great. Now, where are you going now? Over to the garage for my car. Come on, let's get across. Any progress on those idents the porter made? Yeah, we cleaned them up this morning. Three of the six men are in jail, two others have jobs and we're working at the time of the killing. Who's number six? Somebody named Fred Stewart. He was acquitted three years ago of attempted murder. Seems no witness could make positive identification. Well, that sounds like the right man. Yeah, but the same thing might happen here. The porter's not sure it was him. Stewart got an alibi? Well, the police haven't located him yet, Walt. They promised to let us question him when they do, Harvard. Where are you going in your car? Every storage warehouse in town. Why? Porter confessed that he was curious about a man like Fillmore being on Skid Row, so he'd let himself into his room one day. Yeah. May not be important, but he says he came across a receipt from some warehouse. Which one? Ali didn't remember. You know, there's a good chance that Fillmore put that money in storage for a while. Why don't you get your car, too, huh? I'll give you Fillmore's picture. You'll see if anybody recognizes him. OK, thanks. Want me to take the north side warehouses? OK. See you back at the office. This is Leo. Yeah, I know. I'm calling to tell you I did not dissolve our partnership last night just because you wouldn't give me the name of your patron. This morning, I've been studying back copies of the newspapers. For what? Knowledge. I found out, for example, that a young lady named Vicki Ogden was Glen Fillmore's girl. Next, she worked at the Club Romeo. Why tell me? Well, that's where you went after I left you last night. I followed you. Now, Fred save us both a lot of time. Tell me who it was. I haven't mentioned this, but your share of our partnership should be $10,000. Are you that loyal? Well, uh... $10,000. And I'll find out anyway. Roy Craig, the head waiter at the Club Romeo. Good boy. Good boy. Now, what did you find in Fillmore's room? Some old clothes, a pack of cigarettes, a toothbrush, receipt for a package. What kind of package? I don't know. Where was the receipt from? The village warehouse. Well, only one thing left to do now. Visit Mr. Craig. How many, sir? I beg your pardon? How many in your party, sir? Oh, me. I'm alone. Would you like a table? Yeah, very much. Fine. This way, please. Uh, you're Mr. Craig. Yes, that's right. Find a table where we can talk. I'm sorry, sir. I'm not allowed to sit with the patrons. Well, uh, I know. Perhaps this time you can break the rule. I'm sorry. Would the gentleman like this table? Fine. Fine. Uh, Mr. Craig, uh, Fred Stewart sent me. I don't know anyone named Stewart. I came to talk about that package. Maybe I will sit down. Yeah. Who are you? My name is Leo Page.  A what? A collector of nuggets of information. For example, I know about that girl in the check room. She was Glenfield Moore's fiance. Oh, what's that got to do with me? Well, now, among your souvenirs from Fillmore's room was a receipt for a package at the village warehouse. Uh, by, by posing as a policeman on the phone, I've learned a man with a scar on his forehead picked up that package. You've got that scar. Listen, I don't know what... You listen first. Fred and I both feel you cheated him. Ah, we want, uh, an additional 20,000. 20,000? At my house. Would you rather tell the police how you came to use Fillmore's alias after his death? Well? Uh, meet me at 12.30 tonight. Excellent. Yeah, where? At my house. The address is 22 Ohio Avenue. How did you know? I told you. I collect facts. That's one of them. Go on back to work. I'll see you at your home. Walt, we've got a lead. Do you recognize Fillmore's picture? No, but the village warehouse record showed that Fillmore left a package for storage in the day that he disappeared. In his own name? Under his alias, Charlie Jones. The records also showed that the package was picked up this morning. Oh? Yeah. That's our lead. I know it's not a very good one, but it's something. You get a description of the person? Yeah. A square-shoulded man with a long scar on his forehead. That's all? That's it. Must be a couple of thousand men in town who would answer that description. I'll get it, Walt. Yeah. Special Agent Taylor. Captain Kerry, Taylor. Yes, Captain. I've got some news on Vicki Ogden. Oh, what's that? She's moved and left no forwarding address. Oh, when did that happen? Last week. She told the room clerk she was getting married. Huh? To whom? He didn't know. You checked the Club Romeo? She still works there. Well, thanks, Captain. I'll go see her right now. Walt, I'm going over to Club Romeo to check on Vicki Ogden. If you get anything, meet me there. You with the hat check, girl? No. She left the club about an hour ago with the head waiter. His name's Roy Craig, and he's got a long scar running across his forehead. The man who came to the warehouse? That's it. The bartender identified Stewart's picture for me, too. He's been here a few times recently to see Craig. Jim, Stewart has to be a Fillmore's killer. Oh, why? Just before I left the office, we got a teletype from Washington. Huh? According to the unidentified ammunition file, the bullets that killed Fillmore matched the ones in that murder case you were telling me about. The case where Stewart was acquitted? Right. The police caught up with Stewart yet? No, not yet. Where did Craig and the girl go? No one knew. Any address on them? Not that they help here know about. Everybody's address is in the manager's office. And where's he? Out. And nobody knows when he'll be back. Well, Jim, we can't hang around here only. Wait a minute, Walt. I've just remembered something. Let's find a phone. Good evening, Mr. Craig. Oh, come on in. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Ah, this is a nice intimate place. Oh, there's the charming Miss Ogden. How are you? Mr. Page, I told Vicki about your proposition. And what did you think, my dear? I hope you agree. It's fair. What else can we do? Spoken like a true sport. But we did figure 20,000 was a little steep. Oh, well, now, that wasn't an arbitrary figure. I'm prepared to negotiate. Yeah, well, maybe we better have a witness to all this. A witness? Yeah. Come on in, Fred. Mr. Stewart. That's right. I was called on the deal. No, I told you I'd handle these negotiations for you. We'd rather do business direct. Now, Stewart. Stewart, don't you let them tamper with our relationship. I promised to get you more money. We're giving you more money. Not for the old job, though, for a new one. Ah, am I to consider that a threat? That's a gun for it has, Mr. Page. Yes, now, now, just a minute, Stewart. I told you before about those letters that I placed and planted everywhere.  Yeah, Fred stole us all about that, too. But we figured out a way to get around it. Well, you, you... It's real simple. You can't hang a murder on somebody unless there's a body to be found. Nobody's ever gonna find you. Yeah, now, now, just a minute. You're behaving very foolishly, Mr. Stewart. I promised you $10,000 from these people here. They can't be paying you that much.  No, it ain't, Pop. He gets dough from us and cuts out the middleman. That's good business. Take care of him, Fred. Hello, Stewart. I'll get the gun, Jim. Well, everybody, just keep your hands in the air. What is this? Now, when we're through with this search, we'll all take a ride down the headquarters. Roy Craig, Vicki Ogden and Fred Stewart were turned over to state authorities convicted in state court for murder and given life sentences. The money taken by the embezzling bank teller was recovered and returned to the bank officials. Unable to get Roy Craig's address at the nightclub office, Special Agent Taylor remembered the report about the marriage of Vicki Ogden. Checking the Hall of Records, he learned she married Roy Craig. From their license, he secured Craig's home address, a place to which they hurried with the results you have just witnessed. And now, for a further comment on tonight's case and on Crime Prevention Week, we bring you a message from the director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Mr. J. Edgar Hoover. Mr. Hoover's words are, and I quote, Crime is today on the forward march. The latest statistics show higher and higher crime rates. Crime, however, is preventable. If every citizen would do his share, make Crime Prevention your business. Help your FBI and local law enforcement agencies. A vigilant public opinion intent on erasing crime in the community can erase it. The job lies in your hands. Now, one last question to homeowners. How would you like to be able to say, No more mortgage payments for me. I own my home free and clear. Why not put yourself in this enviable position while you're still young? Get in touch with your Equitable Society representative. He'll be glad to show you how Equitable's Assured Homeownership Plan makes it possible to pay off your mortgage years ahead of time. See your Equitable man soon. Or send a postcard care of this station to the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States. Next week, we will dramatize another case from the files of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Its subject? Its title? The Canvas-backed Frame Up. The incidents used in tonight's Equitable Life Assurance Society's broadcast are adapted from the files of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. However, all names used are fictitious. And any similarity thereof to the names of persons living or dead is accidental. Tonight, the music was composed and conducted by Frederick Steiner. The author was Jerry D. Lewis. Your narrator was William Woodson and the author was played by Stacey Harris. Others in the cast were Michael Ann Barrett, Kenneth Barton, Whitfield Conner, Bill Conrad, Herb Ellis and Joe Vitale. This is your FBI is a Jerry Divine production. This is Larry Keating speaking for the Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States and the Equitable Society's representative in your community. And inviting you to tune in again next week at the same time, when the Equitable Life Assurance Society has a thrilling transcribe story from the files of the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The canvas back frame up on this is your FBI. Stay tuned for the adventures of Ozzie and Harriet. There's fun for the whole family when Ozzie and Harriet come your way next. This program came to you from Hollywood. This is ABC, the American Broadcasting Company.


so guys we have found another secret room and today i'm going to showcase to you how you can get inside of this room it's located uh right here i'll show you on the map we are guys um right by the raven claw where are we where are we uh tower so that's that's your fast travel point you want to come to which i've just clicked on but it's a secret room right here and today i'll showcase to you exactly how you get inside of it okay so this is the through flame you want to actually come to which is the one i just said so come to the grand staircase come down to raven claw tower uh if you haven't got this pinned already guys simply just uh track it and we run here it's not hard to get to but this is the one you want to come to right there okay so once you are here guys if you just come through this door here what is the passageway you'll see that the door is there i gotta reveal this okay so there's two pads there's one here and there's one there so on this one oh let's grab that get that money and this one guys you want to roll the owl i believe it is that thing right there is that an owl is it a bird i don't know well that's when you want to roll and this one uh you want to roll the it's like a crab looking thing that thing right there is that a crab five legs sad face i don't know that's it and then guys you can simply open this door and get that release it really is that simple people and there we have it all my gear slots are full so we'll have to remove some out of there but yes on my channel i have guides to all of the secret rooms within Hogwarts castle and many many other guides so if you do want to subscribe i'd appreciate it i post those daily videos people so you won't want to miss that and also guys you want to join my discord share your share your character share your your your secret share your build here on my discord it is linked down really low but guys i hope you enjoyed the video did leave me a like really helps out and hopefully guys i'll see you on that next one