Let us look at an example of how this is constructed, how a simple case can be constructed. Yeah, as always I rely on my double integrator example. Yeah, I am going to look at a control problem by the way, although we were looking at this, I am going to do a control problem. Yeah, does not matter, you can I mean the notions are same, okay. So, this is a control problem, I want to do stabilization. So, I want to go to x1, x2, that is my target, that is an equilibrium. So, I can always target to go there and I want to make sure that want x1 less than equal to 5 and x2 less than equal to 3, okay. Is this a good enough or x2 say greater than equal to minus 3, okay. I am trying to see if this is a good specification or not, not too nice I guess. Yeah, I will just say, yeah, let us just do this, okay. We will just try this, I have no idea how it goes, we will see, okay, alright. So, great, great, great. So, I want this, okay in the transient. So, of course I will give x1 0, x2 0, I would like to start within of course, does not make sense for me to start outside. So, I will start within this set which is say, you know, x1 I will take as 4 and x2 as you know, minus 2, okay. Not that this matters, but we will do that, right. Now, how have would I design a control for this system anybody? How would I design a control or a Lyapunov candidate or CLF for this? What would be a good Lyapunov function, okay. You said x1 square plus x2 square, some said back stepping. So, in this case let us start with x1 square plus x2 square, see what happens. It is not a strictly Lyapunov function, you all understand that. But let us start and see. So, this is of course positive definite and all that, candidate Lyapunov function, all the nice things.  What would be a good control here? Minus x1 minus x2, fair enough because I will get v dot as minus x2 square, negative semi-definite only, then of course I will try Lassal and it will work out, yeah. It will be a stabilizing control, okay. Not a strictly Lyapunov function, let us see if we land in trouble because of that unclear, but we will try. Now, as you can imagine this is not necessarily going to keep me inside this set, I did not, no guarantees. I mean if I simulate it for different initial conditions, maybe suppose I start with, I change the initial condition to the boundary pretty much, 5 comma 3, that is the boundary. What will happen? I will get a control which is negative but that is fine, that is fine because I will get us minus 8 units and that is fine. No, that is not what I want. I want to be on the boundary of this guy and I want to be, give it a positive, so I want to have minus 4. I am just playing so that it does not, it gets out somehow at this boundary, okay. What am I trying? I think you understand what I am trying. So, this is where I start suppose, this is well within the set, right? I started within the set, no problem. What is the control at this point? U0 is what? It is 4 minus 3 equal to plus 1, okay, at that instant, right? So, it is a positive value, right? So, I got x2 dot is, is a positive number, right? I am already on the boundary of x2, right? So, I am going to get out, okay? I just, this worked hard to get a case which will happen, okay? So, basically it is obvious, right? I mean I did not really work or try to do anything to make sure that it remains inside the set. So, obviously I did not use it to do any designs, obviously you cannot expect that anything good will come out of it. I mean you will get out of the set, okay? Even if you start in the set. So, this is in the set, way I have defined it, okay? So, yeah. So, sure I escaped, I can get out of the set, okay? So, that is the basic point, will not stop set escape. As is obvious because we worked, we did not do anything to actually help stop it. What I will do is, I will modify this v now, yeah? x1 squared over x1 square minus 25 plus x2 square, okay? Alright? Very ugly looking, weird looking thing, yeah? And this is what is called a reciprocal barrier function, okay? We have done some reciprocal construction. So, what exactly is happening here? Let us see. If, did I actually get this correct or should I flip the sign? I should have flipped the sign, no? This is not correct, correct? So, now whenever x2 is within plus minus 3, right? The way I sort, then this is positive, right? Again x1 is within plus minus 5, this is positive, right? So, this is positive definite in this region. In, let me call this region C, in the set C, okay? Which is this x1 within plus minus, it is a square region, right? x1 within plus minus 5, x2 between plus minus 3, okay? It is positive in C, okay? What else, what else happens? A positive, I would say actually in C0 or interior of C. Do you understand the notion of interior of a set? Everything but the boundary, in this case plus minus 5 plus minus 3 is the boundary, everything inside is the, so basically if I change the inequality to the, to a strict inequality here, right? Here if these become strict inequalities, that is the interior of the set, okay? So, in the interior of the set, this is positive definite behaves exactly like your standard Lyapunov function, no problem, okay? What happens at the boundary? Blows up, goes to infinity, right? So, goes to infinity at delta C, delta C is the notation for the boundary or, okay? Weird function, weird, ugly, okay? So, continue that it is not nice looking, all right? Great. Now, I am going to do standard whatever I do Lyapunov like analysis with this function now, yeah? Because I know that inside once I am, as long as I mean the interior, things are okay, yeah? Notice that this was not, this is the interior by the way, yeah? This is interior point, this is the boundary, right? Because it is a square, right? This is the boundary, okay? Fine, that is okay, that is not a worry. I could have done this with 2.99999999 and proven the same thing, yeah? So, I could have proven this with the interior point also, not a big deal, yeah? It is not worry about that, okay? I start with this. How do I do the analysis? Take a v dot, okay? Do the painful process of taking derivatives, okay? Can somebody help me now? First I have x1, x1 dot divided by 25 minus x1 squared. That is the first good piece. Then I take the derivative of the denominator, right? What is it, okay? All right? Big mess, whatever that is. I do not know. I am trying if this will work or not, but okay. Then I do the second term x2 x2 dot divided by 9 minus x2 squared, right? Plus or minus again x2 squared divided by times x2 x2 dot, this will become plus divided by 9 minus x2 squared whole square actually, yes? Yeah? Whatever this mess is, okay? All right? So, I substitute for the derivatives, yeah? So, this is x1 x2 minus x1 cubed x2 divided by 25 minus x1 squared divided by 25 minus x1 squared whole square. This will become a plus, yeah? I am just doing the computation here and just substitute for the derivatives, okay? Plus, I will take the x2 dot common because that is the control. So, I will get x2 divided by 9 minus x2 squared plus x2 cubed divided by 9 minus x2 square whole square times the control, okay? Yeah? So, this is if I take, if I sort of actually sum them up, so I will get 9 x2 minus x2 cubed plus x2 cubed divided by 9 minus x2 squared times u, yeah? So, this, okay? Yeah, thank you. First term is x1 x2 not x2 squared, I agree. Second term is fine I think, fine, no? Say that again, I did know, where else? Here now, last step, correct? Similarly, this guy will reduce to 25 minus x1 squared whole squared and you will get 25 x1 x2, yeah? Is that clear? What? Not clear? This addition subtraction, nothing much, okay? Alright? Whatever, messy but it is, okay? Now, what is the good thing that happened in the control? This is the denominator, right? It will go up, right? So, now what should I specify my controllers? Can somebody tell me choice of control now? You can, I am sure you can, please tell me. What is the control? I just try to cancel this guy, no first, for the first term and I will just try to cancel the first term, okay? So, what is it? Minus 9 minus x2 square whole squared divided by 9, right? Because that will leave x2 out here. Then I will take, I want to get 25 x1 out here divided by 25 minus x1 squared whole squared, okay? Whatever this mess is, it is something, yeah? It is a big mess, yeah? And this is going to basically cancel this guy, correct? And then, I will take minus kx2, whatever, I do not care, yeah? Because it will give me negative definite term here, right? Give me nice negative definite term here, okay? So, this will leave me with v dot as minus kx2 squared, sorry. I will make my life simple and probably multiply. I am going to do that, yeah? I will make my life simple. I did not need to do it, but okay, yeah? This, huh? This gives me what? I mean, I will just go bobbler's lemma out. It will go x2 gives me 0, x2 going to be 0, x2 dot going to be 0, okay? x2 dot going to be 0 implies control going to be 0. Because x2 dot is the control, right? Control going to be 0, so I have to just check this guy, yeah? In here, I have already proved x2 is going to 0, right? So, this term is 0. Only left with this guy, yeah? Only way this can go to 0 is if x1 goes to 0, yeah? Because x2 is already gone to 0. So, this guy is not contributing, it is positive term, right? x2 is already 0. So, this is, yeah? Positive term. So, this is just a constant. This is not, obviously, this going cannot go to infinity. Do not want it to go to infinity. It makes no sense, right? So, this is basically x1 has to go to 0, right? So, from this I can prove that x1 is also going to go to 0, right? But even if before I prove any of this, notice, before I even went to this step, I have already proved this. Forget all of this mess. To prove everything goes to 0, I have already proved that v dot is negative semi-definite, which means what? Which means v of x of t is less than equal to v of x of t0, right? Now, notice whatever initial condition you started with was inside, right? So, x t0 belongs to c, right? Or c interior, yeah? I am going to say c interior. So, you started in the interior of the set, right? Of this set. I started in the interior of this set c, okay? So, obviously, you can see from my v construction that in the interior it is nice positive definite function and end of finite value, most important. Yeah? If x1 and x2 are in the interior of c, are in c0, c0, then this is a finite value, right? at initial time, yeah? So, therefore, at future time also it is finite value, correct? So, that is the argument. x t0 in c0 implies v x t0 is finite and this implies v of x of t is finite. Implies x of t does not belong to the boundary. That is, you will never hit the boundary, yeah? Because you started at the finite value of v, you prove that v dot is less than equal to 0. Therefore, v always remains finite, yeah? And the only way for v to become infinite is you are at the boundary, okay? There is no question of going beyond, beyond though there is no question, okay? So, you see by making this small change in the v, of course, I chose a different complicated control also corresponding to the v. This is the leapon of redesign. But I was able to ensure that the trajectories remain inside the set and you can verify in this case. You will never, you can try all these tricks that I tried, but you will never get out of the set, okay? So, this gave me a safe control. This is what is called a safe control, right? And it remained inside a set that you decide. It is a set C, right? But also notice that as you get to the boundary, the control here that you see, right? Also does bad things. Control also explodes, at least on one boundary, if not on the other, okay? So, of course, you are never going to go to the boundary. You have already proved it, but the point is if you started close to the boundary of the set, okay? You started at 4.99. So, you can see the denominator here in the first term of control is very small. Then control is big, huh? So, if you start closer and closer to the boundary, you are required to exert more very, very large values of control. Yes, you can. This may also be somehow intuitive to you. You are saying that I am already working at the corner of my operating region. So, I have to work really hard to push it back inside. Might make intuitive sense, right? If you are sort of working at the edge, and you want to push it inside as fast as possible, as quickly as possible. But this is not always required, okay? The system dynamics may be such that, for example, right? That you are naturally going back. For example, if I think, I mean, this is one of the nice example. If you think a pendulum, think a pendulum. And suppose I do not want the pendulum to go out of this by doing my control. At the, my control is at the tip. I do not, I do not want it to go out here, okay? At this edge, right? So, at, but when I come here, notice, this control, my barrier, this kind of reciprocal function-based control will push it really hard back, really back, really hard. But think about the dynamics of the system. If I actually started here at the boundary, I have to do 0, nothing. I have to do nothing because gravity will push it down, right? But my control is agnostic to that. It is going to really give it a real go here. And it will probably hit at the other edge. The fact is the dynamics is such that I did not have to, it falls, no? And have to do anything. At the edge, it falls. I do not have to work. So, these are not the best choice of barrier functions. So, that is what we will see, how to sort of create better barrier functions, okay?


Saturday, December 12th, the midshipmen of the U.S. Naval Academy faced the cadets of the U.S. Military Academy on the gridiron. As the midshipmen attempt to capture their 14th consecutive victory over Army, Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus has a short message to share with you. Hi, I'm Ray Mabus. I love Navy football and I'm disappointed Ray Mabus because I root for Army. Navy is one America's game 13 years in a row. Army has played in a football game for the last 13 years. Navy's won 14 Commander-in-Chief's trophies. I once had a dream about Army winning a trophy. Don't be like this, me, you'll just be disappointed for the 14th year in a row. Go Navy, beat Army. From all of us at All Hands Update, go Navy, beat Army.


We're now going to look at a couple of other vector operators, the divergence of a vector field and the curl. So let's begin with divergence. And what divergence does, it will take us from a vector and it will result in a scalar. So let's imagine we have a velocity field and we will apply the divergence operator to that velocity field. The divergence operator we call that del dot, and in this case it would be del dot v. That's how you would say that, del dot v, and when we write it out mathematically this is what it is. So that is the divergence operator. We will see it in the continuity equation when we look at conservation of mass, but physically what it represents is the following. So it's the time rate of change of the volume of a moving fluid element per unit volume. And most often in fluid mechanics the place where we'll see it is if we're dealing with incompressible flow. And just from that definition it's the time rate of change of volume of a fluid moving element and if the fluid is incompressible the volume will not change. And consequently when we have incompressible flow we always write del dot v equals zero. And that is something that you should memorize because you'll be using it quite often in fluid mechanics. So that is divergence of a vector field discussed in terms of the velocity vector for the vector field. It could be other vector fields as well. The next one that we're going to look at is curl. The curl operator. We're going to see that quite often when we look at things like vorticity and circulation within a flow field. So the curl operator, we saw the cross product earlier. This is basically the cross product with velocity, you're operating on velocity. But here we go from a vector to a vector. So let's write out the curl. Then we're going to begin with some velocity field. So that is our velocity vector del cross v. That's how you will hear it. So I should say that del cross v. And that would be equal to, we use the determinant ijk partial partial x partial partial y partial partial z. And then we would have vx vy vz. And then you evaluate the determinant and we're going to get a vector coming out of this. Okay. Let me just double check, make sure to make any mistakes. Looks good. Okay. So that is the cross product. Another operator that we'll use. And like I said, we use that for circulation or vorticity in a flow. This operator you use a lot for the continuity equation. So those are two other operators that we'll be using.


Okay, there we go. December daily day 11. I love it. Life is way too short not to experience the wonders of its adventures is so true. And it helped me get me out of my sort of weird funk I was in this morning. So it's just one of the purposes of doing this journal. So it's all good. I hope this gives you some ideas of how you can make the best of what's a weird situation in the world this year for the holidays and no matter what holiday you do celebrate. Instead of focusing on what we can't do, let's have fun with journaling and focusing on what we can do and the bright spots even in the darkness there are some. So anyway, that's it for today. Don't forget to like share and subscribe please. If you do do some version of the December daily affirmations journal I would love to see what you're doing. Please tag me in the post if you're posting it on social media. Leave any questions, comments or concerns down below. I do have two Facebook groups you can join that are private for the members only. You can join and share your work over there. My creative year and a life of art and self-expression. Links to those along with my link tree list of links which includes Etsy and Patreon and my Instagram and all of that stuff are all of that stuff is in the video description. So check it out. Ways to support the free content here on YouTube and over in said Facebook art groups. All of that's in the video description. So check out the links out down there. Do a little breeding, fish around a little bit and you'll find it. If you have a favorite creator here on YouTube or over in the Facebook art groups I know they would appreciate your support. However, you can do that this year especially. So check out their video descriptions if they create video content. If they don't ask how you can support their free maybe they their free content. Maybe they have an Etsy shop or something else and they're just not advertising it for some reason. That's it for today. Don't forget the most important things.  Please wear your mask and go out and do something nice for yourself because you deserve it and I'll see you later. Bye guys.


Alright, I'd like to call to order the Board of Directors of Community Television's special meeting for May 10, 2019. The secretary please call the roll. Chair Mays-Harris. Here. Director Hall. Here. Director Ran. Here. Director Mannheim. Still here. Director Loren. Here. Director O'Driscoll. Here. Director Owen. Director Isaac Gonzalez. Director Lausier. Here. Launay. Launay. Here. Alright. Very good. Thank you. Alright, so we do have a quorum. I note. And we can just move on to the regular agenda. Our one item of substance, which is to approve the contract between the City of Santa Cruz, County of Santa Cruz, and Community Television of Santa Cruz County. And hopefully everybody's had a chance to review one of the versions of the plan. Speak loudly and clearly. I am doing my best. Lawrence Olivier. So, this is a budget, not an acting budget. Gravitas. Gravitas. So, yeah, there were a couple changes that were made. I had one question, but I'll start with the board. If anybody has any comments, questions, background? So, just two things I would comment on. One, just noting the email you sent around that there was one typo that's now been, that's been corrected, may not be in the version we have, which is under section 7B, the second paragraph, it should say, and at the end of the second line there where it says TV deposit accounts and inventory, that's CTV, deposit accounts and inventory. County has already acknowledged that and will change it. The other thing, I was going to suggest a one-word addition. If you go to the recitals on the first page, number eight there, it says CTV will fund a grant program to provide video production equipment for nonprofits to enhance student creativity achievements in the amount of $100,000 a year. I would recommend that we add the word qualified nonprofits so that there's some understanding that if we can't find qualified nonprofits, we would bank that money for the next year rather than an absolute obligation to... I could just put it somewhere. Yeah. Okay. That sounds like a reasonable... Yes. I think it's lovely. Anybody else have any questions, comments? I have some comments towards the end, but I didn't have any specific comments.  There's the one formatting question that you... Right, and so the most recent version, I believe it has been corrected. Yeah, but somehow the 501C3... So, yeah, Kevin didn't actually... Kevin actually retyped this whole contract from the PDF, the non-OCR PDF in the board of... Oh, this one right here. The County Board of Supervisors Agenda. Wow. Yeah. So, and then, of course, Keith pointed out to me that there is that in our Google Docs. Oh, gosh. Oh, report. So, yeah, somehow I think the 501C3 got split, so the version that I have, which is the most recent version... Could you give us a page so we have some idea... That is page eight. Or a section number, because I have twice... Section 20, sub B. Yeah, A. 20. Well, A and B, it was split. Right. Somehow the 501C3, I think Word saw that as a section heading. So, it split those into two. Kevin had corrected that, so the most recent version that I posted on the website and sent out. Okay. Do you want a page number of that? Page number eight. I had... Sorry, I should wait until everybody... I see. So, subsection 20B goes... That actually is a continuation of A, and C becomes B, D becomes C. Yeah, yeah. I can show you mine. I got it. He sent me one saying, I did all the... I just re-did everything with the formatting, and that happened while I did that. Does anybody have the original contract? I came across something that I was wondering about in page 11, and exhibit A... Oh, here it is. Exhibit A, section B, number three, says all the insurance required here shall contain the following clause. It is agreed that this insurance shall be canceled or not only until 30 days. So, I'm thinking there should be a nine in there. Yeah, I think so, too. B, three, the quote, there's agreed this insurance shall not be canceled. Is that in the original? I mentioned that to Kevin this morning, it was like, check the original contract. What page are you on? Exhibit A, page 11. I have the staff report that went to the board of Supervisor. Hold on a second. I think this is an older version. It's 2003. Hold on. I'll pull it up. I just saw that. Is that in the original? Yeah. Section three. So was that fixed? He said back that later? No, I noticed it. It was in... I saw it in my email today. Let me see if it was fixed. Could you tell me... All right, so I've got the last contract pulled up. I think it should be not canceled. Where are we on that? Exhibit A, section B, number three. Section B, one, two, three. All of the insurance required initial contained the following clause. It is agreed that this insurance shall be canceled or non-renewed until 30 days after... That doesn't really make sense. It should be not canceled. They want notice. They want us to give them 30 days notice. That's in the original, so it's carried forward to here, so we just correct it now. We can't operate without insurance. That's somewhere in here. So I shouldn't say not. They want 30 days to make sure that it meets their requirement. So just add the word shall not be, not the word not. And then under Exhibit B, under the fee schedule. So this was where the city had some questions. It's because I've added a thing. Right, about the overtime. Yeah, we have accrued a whole bunch of overtime. I have a chart because the city will have 10-hour, 12-hour meetings. And so when they do that, our guys don't get a break and they don't get meal breaks and we have to pay an hour for that every time that happens. And if they go into overtime, which they do, then we have to pay double and we have to pay overtime. And we don't have that in our... We just pay them the same amount per hour no matter how many people worked and it's costing us money. So I asked Kevin about that and he agreed and he sent Tina the law that we had to pay it. But state law, right? And I think they're just... They're thinking... One of the things that happens is they open the meeting, our guys there, we start recording the meeting and then they go into closed session and you never know how long that's going to be. So they can't leave. So they can't leave. They have to wait for them to come out and then they continue. So they can't go anywhere and they just stay there because they don't know when they're going to come out. So it's a way they structure their meeting that causes it and they're considering now not having them come to open the meeting just come when... But the problem is no one knows when that's going to be. So that's not going to work either. But it is costly to have someone sitting around waiting but he can't go anywhere. And even if he could, if he went away, he couldn't get back until they came out and they told him they were out and then he would come. So, yeah. The closed session is the issue, I think. So let me just... So it says an additional $77 per hour. Yeah, that's... Based on our hourly rating. So you're saying that's in addition to... So it's one and a half. Yeah, it's one and a half. You know, maybe clarifying that overtime really is... Any hours, over eight hours will be charged at the... put the full number in there. Oh, we could do that. Because, I mean, I was like, is it only $77 an hour? Well, they should always be on overtime. No, it's a sense additional, but I can change the language. Yeah, I don't know. I was reading that going... I think I understood what you were saying. They understand it. I mean, if they got it, then that's fun. Because that's the additional. Yeah. That's just really... It's cost us thousands of dollars this year. Not a lot, but like two to three thousand dollars that we didn't have in the budget. We're trying to keep them under eight hours in capital. Santa Cruz, it's the public comment, because they don't have 50 people come in line. And they don't sell time. I don't talk to three minutes each. Oh, they don't? I thought they had it two minutes. No, total. I was asking a question. Oh, total. Yeah, they can go on and on. Everybody gets... Yeah, council, council. You can't tell from year to year what the program is. That's correct. Well, they're doing the homeless issues right now. There are a lot of people coming to, like, the pre-comments, not on the agenda, but they want to talk about it. And there's, you know, we're moving them, and then there's some other... There was some... They had the cannabis thing when that happened. It was so cute. And I guess, boy back, the bear cat. That was another giant. So as long as... Yeah, as long as there are activists, we're going to have to pay this overtime. So I mentioned that, but my question is actually on... the last time, DVDs. So are we charging hourly for bringing DVDs, or is that a per DVD? That's a per DVD, but we discourage them. We usually send them a link. They do say hourly there. The units say hourly. Well, maybe it is. Oh, it does say hourly. Oh, yes, because it depends on how long it is. No, the DVD here says each $25. What is the hourly part? No, but not on the new one. Oh, the new one. I'm looking at the old one. The old one is right. Yeah, technical support is hourly. And each is... So this is even cheaper than it used to be. That's old. Just change hourly to each. Yeah, there it is. Oh, hourly. That's the typing issue, I guess. $25 an hour to bring DVDs? As many as you can burn an hour. Are you keeping track of all these changes? Yes. I'm trying to remember. We don't have to rehash these small things we're talking about. I guess my only other question is not really... I mean, it's just the 56 hours and page three, the pay... So there's no... We've never had any issues with... It doesn't have to be new programming. There's no... I mean, we can rerun... Okay. Locally produced programming. It's section one. It's section 1K of locally produced video programming. That's actually required by the state programs. We have to produce 56 or 58 hours. 56. Well, not produced, but provided, right? I mean, air. Well, yeah, we don't have to produce. It just has to be there and it can be things that we make or things that people in the community have and would like to go on the air. And there's no requirement that has to be original No. If you have a show that you made two years ago and you want to put it on the air and you're a resident, you can do that. Or even if you have a friend in another community television who made a show and you'd like to air here, you can do that. Okay. One last question. There's only mention of Comcast here. There's no mention of Charter, right? This is with the city and county. City and county are... We don't have Comcast. But they don't provide any... They don't provide franchise fees? Not to this. They provide them... Well, do they provide franchise fees? They don't give us franchise. We don't get them. Right, you don't. You don't get it directly. It comes to the county, the city. That's the question I was about. Well, franchise fees... There's probably a different franchise. Charter's franchise is not with the county, I don't think. No, they're with the city. It's just with... And Watsonville. And I don't know whether...  I don't know if they get pet fees or not and whether... We used to get some money from them, but they stopped. We didn't get money. They talked from Watsonville and Capitola? Yeah, through them. I'm not exactly the process, but at some point... Kamala Harris told them, forget it, you can't do that. They claimed it was a tax. We should have asked him and he said it's coming very slowly. Kevin, yeah. That was it for me. Anybody else have any? Joey said you had some... Oh, and towards the end, I have a thought of what to do, but I'll share that. In terms of emotion, yeah. Well, I'll throw out an idea and then I can turn it into emotion. We don't know what the city is going to say, but we do have to meet some deadlines. My thought is this is so similar to what we had unless there's some major changes. I'd be willing to put emotion out to have the executive director, the chair and the vice chair and Tom, if they agree that it's minor, just give them the authority to approve it and be done with it so we don't have to have a second meeting. And that may happen real fast or who knows, but... And then that gives you the authority to ask the city what their thoughts are if there is something. Kevin says, call up, you can just do it right there. You don't need another meeting. As one of the people you mentioned, my only concern with that is that I will be out of town from the 21st through the 26th. Well, I'll just put now at least of that two are available. Executive director, chair, vice chair and Tom. And reason for Tom is he's on the finance committee. And I am a city employee, so I think I have probably a conflict of interest, but not positive. I'm a county employee. Well, whatever the case, the questions are being raised by the body I represent. The city, yeah, the county's already approved it. So, I'm in the clear. So, unless Larry, you want to be involved? Well, I mean, I can if Tom can can't. I'll make a really long motion. How about a minimum of three? When we're meeting on the 20th as well, right? They want to try to have it done before then? Because of the budget? Oh, okay. We'll see what happens. I'll throw a motion out and try to put every contingency on. I can think of. I'll move that we approve the proposed draft contract with the county of Santa Cruz and city of Santa Cruz, subject to changes which may be made by the city of Santa Cruz so long as those changes are acceptable to three of the five people mentioned. The chair, vice chair, secretary or Tom Mannheim and they have the authority to approve the contract for purposes of acting by the county board supervisors in the meantime and then the second part of it is if for some reason this matters delayed beyond our next meeting it just be placed on the meeting agenda for regular action. I can repeat it. Check. Does your motion also include the I think four changes that we talked about? And I'll accept that as a friendly amendment. Let me just go over them and make sure you've got them. One is adding the word qualified to the recitals number eight so that it reads production equipment for qualified nonprofits to enhance student creativity. Adding the letter C before TV in that's section 7B in the second paragraph section 7B that's already been changed that's in the latest that gets distributed because I didn't see it section 20 limited collapsing what currently are sections 20A and 20B and 1 this paragraph So are we just adding qualified? And then changing hourly to each. And we have the not Yes, the not. Exhibit A. Exhibit A not and exhibit B each. I have all three. So we have qualified to not eat. Okay, we got it. Just put them in. She's not qualified. Okay, so I accept that it's a friendly amendment. So I made a long motion. Until to point it out, I don't have to use my photographic memory to repeat it. I used to. My wife gets I forget I just thought that covered both contingencies. One, be able to act reasonably quickly. And two, if nothing happens before our next meeting, it comes to the full board. I'll second that motion. We have a motion and a second. Is there any further discussion? I'll call the vote. All those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed or abstentions? So unanimously. So on the other item on our agenda is adjournment. Is there a motion for adjournment? Second. He's first. We haven't done one yet. All those in favor, please say aye. Aye. Any opposed? We are adjourned.


What's going on, everyone? Sam here with late sports cards, ripping 22, Panini Obsidian, football. Oh my god, bro. You got to be kidding me, OBS. Just crashed again. Well, I mean, we're back. We're back, so that's good. Gonna just read off the list of names and teams really quick here. Got Armando B with the Chargers, Brian F. Ravens, Christian F with the Bills, Daniel B. Eagles, David F. Chiefs, Edward P. Cowboys, Suki M. Texans, Jim C. Saints, James H. Giants, Jeremy H. Dolphins Vikings, Jonathan L. Jets, Justin V. with the Bengals, Kent I. Patriots, Kevin S. Bucks, Titans, and Colts. Thank you there again, Kevin. Kevin H. with the Seahawks, Lewis C. Steelers, Michael R. Lyons, Michael N. Cardinals, Michael P. Bears, Broncos, Mitch M. Rams, Ryan S. Falcons, Ryan F. Panthers, Steve R. Brown, Stephen W. Football team, Thomas R. with the Packers, Jags, Thomas I. with the Niners, and Valerie P. with the Raiders. Good luck here, everybody. Let's do it. Oh, God. Vaughn's shift ended early today. Oh, boy. Oh, God. And we got Vaughn for the next nine breaks. Oh, boy. Everybody brace yourselves. Again, guys, we got just three to go in the next one. Number five. Number five, we're down to just the Browns, Broncos, Seahawks. Browns, Broncos, and Seahawks. Here we go. Wondale, Robinson, Purple to 100. God. Volcanic, Obsidian is Dak to 99. Kyle Pitts. It's 8 to 50. Sauce Gardner, three-color patch. Nice one there for the Jets. Bengl's gone in six. Thank you, Riley. Got one of 99. Mr. Montrell Washington. That is, again, one of 99 in the orange color match. Last team taken. Who is that? Kevin, I got you, buddy. 28, a 75. Alec Pierce. Let's go, man. Congrats on that one. Broncos gone in six. Thank you there again. Kevin. Or, no, that wasn't Kevin. Who was that? Thank you there. Scott, Scott. And 13 of 25. Isaiah Spiller on the RPI. Armando is stacking up on these. Congrats, Armando. You're getting new flooring. Ah, that's good. Closed early today. Vaughn, what do you do? I never asked you that.  I'm at Docs Vaughn's workplace. Marcus Jones for the Patriots, the 75. Titans gone in seven. Thank you there, Scott S. Morgan taking the Seahawks in five. We're down to just two. Calvin Austin Purple, 14 out of 100 for the old Pittsburgh Steelers. Face of Debo. Chris Godwin, six of 50. Jake Shirt jersey. Two-color patch. Going to the Buccaneers. Browns Broncos available in the next one. 50 of 50. John Mechie, three-colored patch. Nice one there. Then cleaning up. Gotcha, gotcha, gotcha. 69 of 75. Javante Williams on the Aurora. That's pretty cool, Vaughn. I got to give you that. That's pretty awesome. And 43 of 99 is Traylon Burks, the Sharpie Man. Two-colored rookie jersey auto. We've got just the Browns and Broncos. Number four, or box number three, I should say. Hold on. Hold on. I need to never die. No, that will never die. That Prescott Orange. 48 of 75. Fair, fair. I got you Vaughn. AJ Turrell, purple. 89 of 100. Javante Williams. Danny Gray, 45 of 125. Four of the Niners on the Umbrickle. 20 of 75 is Sam Howell, rookie eruption. Kevin, if no one got you, Sam got you. 18 of 49. Jonathan Taylor on the Aurora auto. Let's go. Congrats, Kevin. Second auto in that last team taken. Bangle's gone in 10. Joseph B taking the Browns in five. We're down to just the Broncos. And how about 18 of 50. We've got London on the track. That is Drake London on the two-colored RPA for the Falcons. Very nice. Congrats on that. On to now box number four. I'm just gonna take a picture of you top loading. I'm just gonna say, oh, wow. Oh, oh, Rashad White. That is the new parallel this year, three of five. Dude, that's nasty. Look at that thing, Jake. That is the Electric Neon Mojo. Rashad White rookie for the Bucks. That is fantastic, dude. Three of five. That dude's good, too. Yeah, that's really awesome. Nice to hit a rookie. Yeah, there's been some good stuff. We hit a couple of good Colt Herber and CMC Colorblast. One-to-one Kyle Pitts. London to 10. London Gold to 10. Derek Stingley Jr. Orange, 55 of 75. That's a really cool car, dude. That is a great new parallel they put in this year. I love it. Jalen Thompson rookie. 28 of 75 is Dan Marino. Nice one there. Three-color patch. That is player worn for the Dolphins. Nice one there. Love to see Marino being in products. Of course. Is 37 of 50. Kill it, Trab. Trab is Kelsey. 37 of 50. Oh, Brian. I got Brian, too, man. Brian, if no one got you, Sam got you. 25 of 50. How about a lightning strike? Justin Tucker, the greatest of all time right there. Automat Tuck. 66-yard field goal. Greatest kicker to ever do it. And we got a redemption. What's our redemption going to be? Rookie Jersey Auto of Wandaille Robinson going to the Giants. Nice little redemption there for the Higantes. Higantes. Nice one there. Yeah, isn't it nice? Guys, we got just the Broncos. Just the Broncos to go in number five, breaking next. Just the Broncos. Brian Robinson Jr. T100 once. And Chad Mummu Rookie for the Jags. 14 of 25. Nice one there. Caleb's super collection. That joke came from just one time he pulled a Chad Mummu. And I was toppling for him, like, that's your super collection. That'll forever be Caleb's super collection. Geno Smith. And Colorblast is Traylon Birx. Boom. Let's go Titans.  He's got Tennessee. That is awesome, man. That is going to Kevin S. Kevin. Let's go, buddy. And Kevin had the buck, so he gets the Rashad White as well as two Colts. Kevin killing it, dude. And this is well to 125. Jonathan Taylor. Nice one there on the trifecta material. Colts coming in clutch right now as well for Kevin. Congrats, buddy. Falcon's gone now in 10. That is 53 of 100. We've got Sam Hubbard. Lightning Strike Auto for the Bengals. Cool one there.  I hate this guy. He's great. Don't get me wrong, he's a great player, but I can't stand him. 57 of 75 is Jameson Williams.  I was here top loading for Forrest one day when that happened. And I was just pissed. 41 of 50. Jalen Tolbert. Obsidian. Two-colored RPI for the Cowboys. No, Henry. No, it was not. No, it was not. It was not. That was not amazing. That was the opposite of amazing. That sucked. How did that even happen? I don't know, Jake. I wasn't there. Should have just ran it. Still blows my mind how that happened.  They're going to have Trey McBrides going to be the primary guy for sure. Let me double check for you really quick as well.  I was laughing during the Miami Miracle, so, huh? Yeah, Trey McBride. More Trey McBride, Hyundai Ingram, Jalen Thompson, Maggi Sanders, all have autos. Robbie Anderson has an auto. Chosen Anderson has an auto. McBride. JJ Watt has an equinox gear. Trey McBride. Kyler's got jerseys. Trey McBride. Kyler Murray, again, on a couple of insert checklists as well. All right. We've got rookie is Jake Julian Chestnut, 42 of 50. And then we've got nice one here. It's going to be orbital. That is Kenny Pickett. I believe this one is new. 18 of 50, you can mag this one, Jake. 18 of 50, Kenny Pickett. I'll get that mag for it. John Meshi Rookie for the Texans. Got AJ Dillon. That is atomic material going to the Packers. But laughing, confusion, pain. Got 24 of 75. Another Alec Pierce, unbreakable. Nice one there. Congrats on that. Again, Kevin. Thanks for selling us out again, buddy. Again, just the Broncos guys in the next one, too. Redemption. TJ Watt, magmatic signatures going to the Steelers. Nice one there. Pittsburgh. Congrats on that. A magmatic's really cool checklist on that one as well. Should just be number two, I believe, 100. Let me double check what TJ Watt is. Number 200, yes. And 15 of 99 is John Meshi, Rookie Jersey Auto for the Texans. That'll do it for the break, guys. Do a quick recap here. We've got Jonathan Taylor, Danny Gray, that is Alec Pierce, Dan Marino, Sam Howell, Sauce Gardner, Travis Kelsey, John Meshi, Chris Godwin, and an AJ Dillon. Jeez, careful over there. Wondale Robinson, Sam Hubbard, Montrell Washington, John Meshi, a Traylon Brooks, Jameson Williams, Alec Pierce, Javante Williams, a TJ Watt, which is going to the tee. Going to the tee with like a little, I, I, Traycolundit, we're going to write TJ Watt on there. There's Jalen Tolbert, Justin Tucker, Jonathan Taylor, and Isaiah Spiller. Again, all jokes aside, that is going to the Steelers, the TJ Watt. We had Rashad White on the Neon Mojo, etch, three of five. We had a Kenny Pickett on the orbital. I think this is new this year, 18 out of 50. And then we had a Traylon Burks on the color blast for the good ol' Titans. That'll do it for the break, guys. Thanks again for the film. Next up, number five, let's sell it on.


There are many theories surrounding the lost continent of Atlantis, not only are we aware of a civilization that existed in the very remote past, we are also conscious that this civilization possessed advanced knowledge that could have surpassed modern technology. From Europe to New Zealand and even in the Americas, we see evidence of lands that have been submerged, cities with huge structures that must be more ancient than the proposed timeline we are forced to accept. This is obvious evidence of a cataclysm, a great flood that swept the earth and consumed these civilizations. One place you may not be familiar with is claimed to be the cradle of civilization thought to exist just off the coast of India, Kamari Kandam is one of the most mysterious places in all of the world. Wait till you hear this. Stories of a very ancient land submerged by the Indian Ocean have been recorded throughout history. The story of Kamari Kandam is not regarded as just a story, but seems to be laden with nationalist sentiments. It has been claimed that the Pendian kings of Kamari Kandam were the rulers of the whole Indian continent, and that Tamil civilization is the oldest civilization in the world. When Kamari Kandam was submerged, its people spread across the world and founded various civilizations. This theory backs the claim that the lost continent was also the cradle of human civilization. According to Kamari Kandam proponents, the continent was submerged when the last Ice Age ended and the sea levels rose. The Tamil people then migrated to other lands and mixed with the other groups leading to the formation of new races, languages, and civilizations. Some also theorize that the entire humanity is descended from the inhabitants of Kamari Kandam. Both narratives agree on the point that the Tamil culture is the source of all civilized culture in the world, and Tamil is the mother language of all other languages in the world. According to the most versions, the original culture of Kamari Kandam survived in Tamil Nadu. It is thought in Indian culture that the ancient Sumerian civilization was started with the submergence of this land around 20,000 years ago. Various Tamil literature from ancient and medieval times contains legends about a land located at the south of India that was consumed by the ocean. A catastrophic event believed to have caused by tsunami or a flood. What do you guys think of this anyway? Comments below and thank you for watching.


On August 9th at 9 a.m. Pacific, we'll be broadcasting live from the Cube Studios in Palo Alto, California, SuperCloud 22, an open industry event made possible by VMware. SuperCloud 22 will lay out the future of multi-cloud services in the 2020s. John Furrier and I will be hosting a star lineup, including Kit Colbert, VMware CTO, Benoit Dajaville, co-founder of Snowflake, Mariana Tessel, CTO of Intuit, Ali Godzi, CEO of Databricks, Adrian Cockroft, former CTO of Netflix, Jerry Chen of Greylock, Chris Hoff, aka Beaker, Maribel Lopez, Keith Townsend, Sanjeev Mohan and dozens of thought leaders. A full day track with 17 sessions, you won't want to miss SuperCloud 22. Go to thecube.net to mark your calendar and learn more about this free hybrid event. We'll see you there.