I've offended some people and angered some people. Not sure if I committed a sin, but I would like to apologize. I don't want to offend anyone, but I do want to do my duty and try to present the scriptures correctly. And so for that reason, I would use the Hebrew or the Greek, not to show off, not to be arrogant, not to show that I know anything, but just to be as honest as I could to the text. Why? Because after all, the Hebrew text was given to us in the Old Testament. The New Testament was primarily given to us in Greek. There is some air make in both the Old and New Testament, but I want to just be honest to the text because I wanted to make sure that one, I'm not wrong and also they're not teaching anyone wrong. But some people don't like that. As a matter of fact, some said that you can't prove eternal security unless he uses the Greek, which means I'm somehow twisting the scriptures by using the Greek, you know, the language that it was actually given to us in. But I want to apologize, not though I've done in particular sin, but because some people feel as though that I cannot make the case of eternal security, you know, one saved always saved. If you're saved, you'll always be saved. Some feel that I can't make that point unless I use the Greek. So I'm going to do my best going forward in the future to not use so much Greek. At least I don't think I will.  You can't use a concordance and go to the Greek. You can't use a concordance and go to the Hebrew. So let's just be fair, even across the board, I'll do my best not to use Greek. I can't promise that I won't ever do it, but you ought to at least those of you who think I should not use Greek, you ought to at least follow your own advice and not use Greek ever. Now that being stated, I want to go to some of the passages that I bring up and I'm only going to bring up the English because to me it seems as though the English makes this pretty clear, abundantly clear. But you all forgive me as I put the text on the screen that there is some Hebrew to the right, disregard that if that doesn't fit you or just look at it with your left eye. Don't look at it with your right eye or the right side of the screen. But that being the case, Jeremiah says in English, God has stated that I will give them one heart and one way that they may fear me always for their good and for the good of their children after them. Verse 40 I think is pretty clear in English, because I will make an everlasting covenant with them that I will not turn away from them to do good and I will put my fear of them or the fear of me, I'm sorry, in their hearts so that they will not turn away from me. So the English to me seems pretty clear that God says he will not turn away from those who he puts his spirit in their heart. He won't turn away from them, nor those people who have the spirit of God in their heart. They won't turn away from him. So it'd be kind of difficult for me to see just the English how a person can turn away from God when he says they won't and how God will never turn away from them when he says he will not. I don't know if there's a third option. Maybe if we looked in the Hebrew we could see if there's a third option. I don't think it is, but let's go to another passage and let's just deal with just the English. In the English it says then I will sprinkle clean water on you and you will be clean. Now this is Ezekiel 36. Now he said he's going to sprinkle clean water on people and they will be clean. Look what he says in verse 26. Moreover, this is God saying what he will do. Notice God is saying what he will do. I will do. Now this is in English and so I think this is pretty clear. I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit within you and I will remove the heart of stone from your heart of flesh and give you a heart of flesh. And this part right here I think is pretty clear even in English. I will put my spirit within you and cause you to walk in my statues that you will be careful to observe my orders. Now this is God speaking. Now obviously God didn't speak in English because well there was no such thing as English on the planet at least for another couple thousand years. But the case being it's been translated in English from Hebrew but we're not going to look at Hebrew. He says that I will cause you to walk in my statues. Seems to me like we won't stop. We won't once the spirit is in us. We won't not walk in the statues. And as he says in Jeremiah that we won't turn away from him. But pastors in English. But then we go to another couple of pastors in the New Testament and let's just look at the English again. Pardon the Greek. That's going to be on the right hand side of your screen guys. I apologize. It's on the software. But continue. He says Jesus said to them I am the bread of life. He who comes to me will not hunger. And he who believes in me will never thirst. Now it didn't say if you have to keep believing just the English says if you come to him. Matter of fact didn't say if but it says he who comes to me will not hunger. He who believes in me will never thirst. Does it mean that you have to keep believing? It doesn't say so but I think that's what I think it's safe to say. Well it doesn't say so in the English. It doesn't say so in the English but I think it's a safe bet to assume that you must keep believing and in doing so you will never thirst. But he says I said to you that you have never said that you have seen me and yet do not believe. All the father gives me will come to me. So all the ones the father gives to him he says will. That this is definite a future action that will definitely happen because that's what the word will means will come to me. And the one who comes to me I will certainly not cast out. So the person is definitely going to come and I think by the same assumption that the person must keep believing I think this person will keep coming. I don't know if this is a one-time thing or not just the English didn't let me know that. But I think that's safe to say that that person who comes to him will never be cast out for I've come down to do the will from heaven not to do my own will but the will of him who sent me. This is the will of him who sent me that all that he has given. So all in English all every last one of them that he has given to me that is to Jesus. Jesus says I will lose nothing. So all of those that he's given to him one they will come and he won't lose any of them. This is just the English so far and he will lose none but raised up in the last day for this is the will of my father.  That's kind of keeping with what he said in Jeremiah. They will never turn away from him and he will never turn away from us. That's just what it seems like in English. I'm not going to use the Greek because I don't think we need to use the Greek. I think the English is pretty clear just like in John 10. John 10 verse 4 he says when he that is Jesus the shepherd puts forth all his own as his sheep because remember they were given to him by the father. He goes ahead of them and the sheep follow him because they know his voice. A stranger I think this is pretty telling in the English of course he says a stranger they simply will not follow. When you use that kind of terminology when you send someone even in English of course we're speaking English that they simply will not follow. That is kind of a polite way of saying they're definitely going to follow. They simply will not follow the stranger and notice what he says because they don't know I'm sorry I got ahead of myself. They simply will not follow but will flee so his sheep will flee because they do not know the stranger's voice. And then he says something also to let us know that he's not just dealing with just Jews. In verse 16 he makes a statement about the Gentile sheep. He says I have other sheep which are not of this fold. I must bring them also and they will hear my voice and they will become one flock with one shepherd. So he says what they will do which is in keeping with what he's prophesied he will do. I think it's interesting though that under the old covenants it's on the old way that if a person had their faith in what the atoning work was for them that that person is in right standing for one year but they could lose that standing the following year. They're not guaranteed to stay in that standing continually. They have to keep adhering to the day of atonement. This is a yearly atonement that they have to deal with. And so if a person could lose it well then they're pretty much basically under the same system as the old. Under the old you can be atoned for this year next year not be atoned for. If that's the same case here you can be atoned for this year and next year not being the same right standing but then it kind of makes you wonder why would Jesus come. I'm just wondering these things in English. So you all forgive me for wondering in English out loud. But then Roman 8 he makes a statement. Paul says and we know that God causes all things. So he says that God causes. Now this is English so I've got to go with the English. I can't I can't delve into the Greek. But God causes all things to work together for the good to those who love God. So if you love God how long do you have to love God? What did he say? Just as if you love God well if you love God let's say I would take this in English on day one. If I love God let's say it's a Monday. Then whatever happens on a Tuesday because I loved him on a Monday whatever happens next he's going to cause that to work for the good of the person who loved him. And let's say the person on Monday so whatever happens on Tuesday if it's bad he's going to cause that to work for the good of that person that loves him. And the good could only be that he stays safe. It can't be that he loses salvation because that wouldn't be good. But he's going to cause those to work together for good. Maybe I'm seeing this incorrectly but I do know English pretty well. Work together for good to those who love God to those who are called according to his purpose. So whatever happens whatever issue show up bad things good things you name it. He's going to cause God is going to cause that to work for the good of those who love him. So for God on Monday he's fine on Tuesday. And because he's fine on Tuesday he'll be fine on Wednesday because God is going to cause whatever happens on Thursday to work for his good. So even on Friday he's still good.  That's just how I'm taking it in English. I could be wrong. Now you guys got to deal with the English and I'm saying just deal with the text, the text that we have here. Just these texts because these are English texts and I want to make sure I'm understanding. Now I could be wrong about these texts. Could be wrong. Please don't go to four or five other different texts. We can go to those later but I want to deal with these texts in English. Could you do that for me please? I'm just asking. You don't have to because you've got the whole Bible used and I've been using the whole Bible and I still don't see where we can lose it. But and I see where some might look that way. But again, these are some of the few of the English texts that seem to be straightforward. Notice what he says here in John 1 John 5 18. He says we know that no one is born of God. I'm sorry. We know we know that no one who is born of God sins. Look what he says. But he who was born of God keeps him God. Now who's keeping him? Let's say it's me or you. If you're born of God this English seems to say that it's God that keeps you. I don't know if there's any other way to look at this. Now I think we can even make this clear in the Greek but I've promised as often as I can as much as possible not to use the Greek. But in this case seems to say that it's God who keeps you. Didn't say that you keep yourself. But it's God. Am I reading this correctly? I'm just just the English the middle section of the screen is God who keeps you and the evil one does not touch him. Now that's us. That's born of God. Now what I also want to ask you guys another question for you all that believe that again I use the Greek too much or the Hebrew too much which is fine. I understand that because you don't speak Greek. You don't speak Hebrew. But then that's kind of hypocritical since the writers of the scriptures didn't speak English. It's a bit arrogant I think to think that you have to speak the language of the person that's reading it in order for what they said to that that that goes a little that's a bit of a stretch. So if I say something in Spanish and here I am today in English reading it however it was translated I have to understand that way and no one could ever come back and put it in the Spanish even if it might have been a little bit of ambiguity in English. But I think the English is pretty straightforward when I ask you guys a question in the English if he says if you can lose your salvation then you can never get it back. Is there a way around that he says for in the case of those who have once been enlightened and who have tasted the heavenly gift and have been made partakers of the Holy Spirit and have tasted the good word of God and the powers of the age to come and then have fallen away it is impossible to renew them again to repentance. So according to the English if you were saved and I believe he's talking about saved people in Hebrew six people that know the Lord they have tasted the goodness of the Lord been partakers of the spirit. If you fall away it's impossible. Okay fine you say that if you fall away means that you fall away fine. Does it also mean that if you can fall away then it also is impossible. Now I know I know it impossible means in the English impossible means it's not possible. So is it impossible to be renewed again to repentance. Now you can use the Hebrew if you want to because I'll be honest with you I want to still use the Greek from time to time in the Hebrew when the English when I need further clarification or just for edification because again that's what it gave us gave it to us as I think it's wrong. I think it's wrong headed. I think it's disingenuous. I do not think that is proper for anyone to say Corey or anyone else relies on the Greek because you relying on the English is built upon someone else knowing and relying on the Greek to give you the English knowing the Hebrew to give you the English or Spanish or French or German. And so when people come together either from different languages and study the scriptures and they might there might be a difference in and understand the words and translation because I can promise you the Spanish Bible does not really like the English Bible. I can promise you the French Bible or the Mandarin Bible or the German Bible does not read like the English Bible different languages and I can promise you also that they're English speaking people that read the very same words that you do a little bit differently. But what do we do when we get to these moments where we just don't simply understand or have an agreement if if I know for some it's a big possibility it's a big if if the Greek or if the Hebrew sheds light on it why would you not use it. But if you disagree if you disagree that hey I speak English all I need is English. God gave me this Bible in English which he did not but God gave me this Bible in English.  I think you ought to as a matter of fact matter of fact I think what you ought to do more than that is take a quick little lesson learn some of the Greek lessons learn some of the Hebrew lessons. You don't have to become proficient but just understand what's happening there so that you could understand the tenses the voices the cases in the in the Greek nouns and so forth Hebrew constructs and so forth. Pernominal suffixes in Hebrew all those different things I would like for you just to get an idea you don't have to be proficient that way you can get a book and when you come up to a word you're not very sure what it is but you can at least look it up and have some familiarity with it. You know just like we do in English because most of us in English don't remember some of the lessons that were taught to us in high school English or maybe college English or junior high English. Most of us could if you ask the average person what a nominative is most folks would know or pretty good now most most English speaking people would know off the top of their head they have to go back maybe look okay now I remember what Ms. Crabb apples taught us so even in English there are rules that go with this and so that's just my only point if what I've said has offended anyone or bothered someone it's never my intent to bother upset anyone for using anything or for doing anything for saying anything especially the Greek it's a tool that we have at our disposal that I think we ought to make the most of and so if my belief is the problem whether I think you should say that but if Greek is the problem then I think we really have a bigger problem I think the problem hidden with Greek is the fact that someone could use Greek to prove their point whereas another person can't use Greek to prove their point and I think they feel left out or bothered or anger anger at the fact that someone has the audacity to not believe the way they believe if someone were to use the Greek or the Hebrew to disprove what I'm saying there's no problem we'll go with that incidentally if you go back and look at the videos all of the videos that I've ever done regarding eternal security one saved always say do you know how many times someone has ever used the Greek to disprove what I'm saying do you know how many times someone has ever pointed out something in the Greek to say that you can lose your salvation none not once now anyone is open to use Greek anyone I'm not the one person that that can read Greek and I'm not I'm not I'm not the greatest edit so it's open for anyone how many times has anyone come into this this Greek phrase means this which definitely shows that you can lose your salvation not once not in any debates not with a so-called scholar not with a person who has a concord is no one and when I look on YouTube or other social media platforms I can't find one person that's used the Greek to show that you can lose your salvation now I might be wrong there might be some out there I would love to see it because again it's a tool for everyone to use and so I say use whatever you have at your disposal make every effort to learn his word even if that means you might find out that you're wrong so be it same with me I have changed my views on a lot of different doctrine and guess what sometimes the Greek has helped me to see hey Cory you were wrong on that and so while I'm having a little fun here I am not apologizing really for using Hebrew Greek I would never apologize for delving deeply into God's word and I would just say listen I'm not I'm nothing special you too could do the exact same thing and then come along and disprove it with the same thing the same tools that I'm using that are also at your disposal because it's not about who's right but it's about what's right we are not saved because of what we know we are saved by who we know however we get closer to who we know by improving on what we know amen


The G-protein-first mechanism is a process whereby G-protein-coupled receptors, GPCRs, activated by first binding to the inactive G-protein, which then opens up the intracellular region of the receptor to allow for further signalling. This process is observed in the three closest subtypes of opioid receptors, or, or, or. For these receptors, the agonist binds to the extracellular domain of the receptor, but it is only when bound to the inactive G-protein that the intracellular region of the receptor is opened up. This allows for the G-protein to be recruited to the receptor, thus initiating the signal transduction cascade. This article was authored by Amir Hosein-Mafi, Sakyan Kim, and William A. Goddard.


Yeah, so thanks guys, how are you like it? So it's my first Europe Python, but I like it a lot Let's see where it's next year For those that so in the printed Version of the the program now was something about cities That's not it. So they changed the schedule a little bit. So Yeah So I'm gonna talk about plot we are a client kind of a hobby I I had for the last couple of years Now I'm then doing something for it and now that I was accepted here for Europe I think I finally could put some effort into it to have it like Usable and since yesterday evening it for the first time it did go through so let's hope so in the morning today It wasn't maybe In the meantime it was so let's see Um, it's not as polished as it could be So maybe about me first Yeah I'm Mathematician by formation Spend a couple of years in academia Now since two years, I'm senior consultant with the one-shot solutions where I'm doing projects in data science AI Coaching people setting up infrastructure for data science stuff like that and also Having I'm having some open-source projects. So you you will get the slides there you will find the links and Introducing today for the first time to a public audience plot VR is there as well One or two sentences about the one solutions so yeah We are about 40 consultants and I Think it's I It's really correct to call us a talent heaven so if you think you are a talent and You're working or want to work in Switzerland, then maybe contact us. We are hiring Come to me or go to our homepage. We are doing all the things for clients in the data pipeline Yeah, and yeah, it's really a Smart team that we have there Okay, what is plot VR about so A show of hands who of you is doing like graphs like this or plots a scatter plot stuff like that on a weekly basis Or monthly basis something like that dashboards. Okay Lots of people data scientists do that a lot and you you really get skillful Producing the things that you need but now and then You are missing this one dimension that actually would be there the third dimension.  Who is using them on a? As well weekly or monthly basis Okay one person there Cool I Usually don't stick with them. I Think it is because they are still they're not a real thing There's still a 2d projection of the data. You don't really can feel the data the third dimension So there are they used to be Expensive possibilities like 3d Monitors or maybe domes stuff like that But as data scientists usually it's not so important for you to use these tools So probably you won't have a standing something like that around So three years three or four years ago there was this announcement At Google I owe about the cardboard and when that came out. I thought hey If that's inexpensive so because you basically you need to buy the cardboard you don't even need to do that and then you can Visualize really in 3d and you get a three-dimensional impression because you really have the stereo effect that could be it so Yeah, I thought hey, let's do that and that's what this talk is about So how did I progress with that or what are the issues you you need to think about so the first issue is okay? You are on your desktop or Notebook having your data doing your gg plots or your Seaborn are whatsoever and now the idea would be to get it onto a device So you need to somehow transfer the data from from your from your workstation to your device Okay, that's one point you need to think about Probably Bluetooth could be an idea, but that's a little bit weird for me to program. I have Frightened maybe once but I didn't achieve it. So I thought okay. Let's do it via HTTP stuff Then maybe we can do so two years ago the AR hype came so maybe you can do both of those together That would be an idea then the next question Can we just put like a mobile web app where we look into these things or do we need a real? iOS or Android app programmed Also, how do we navigate in this VR? That's always a problem And then will it cost to use or something so will we need some some expensive hardware or not? So the idea was no, let's use open source for that and then also can I create all of that in my free time? So the last point was maybe the biggest issue. So that's why it's now three years later So a little bit an overview what what is there now? So basically we have three Three devices where we are three clients where we can look into the HTML one the iOS one and the Android one The Android one I started back then when I I did those things and then I switched to an iPhone and now I'm I did it mostly for iOS. So the Android is a little bit lagging behind Now VR works in all of them the HTML version of the VR is kind of not nice I don't know why The AR version of HTML seems to not be as nice today So it needs to have like some some anchor in your in your vicinity But the others yeah, you see what it is there and actually Since today also the iOS version is on GitHub So if you want to double around with it Yeah, let's show you how it works So I'm going now for the For the iOS up So let's see Okay, so here you see my screen share and here see say the Jupiter lab So the code that basically is really simple You import this package after you have installed it This will start in a different process so a tornado server on this port 2908 and Yeah That's it. Now you need some data to plot. Let's plot iris Who of you doesn't know what the iris data set? No, so these are the not died data scientists, I don't know or not the classical statistical data scientists Okay, and then you play basically send it to that server. So now, okay, that could be just empty functions, maybe Let's see what happens now in the iOS version So we open this plot. They are now you see they need to communicate via IP So they are actually I'm using here my phones wireless I'm also here for for my Macbook and It actually shows me up that here. I need to connect to that. So first of all, I need to find the server so I'm Do it going for the qr qr code tech. There it is So now it's there. So I now want first to look at the AR version So let's see what the demo got sting Okay, so first of all, yeah microphone is maybe not there So you see here. I put like a the origin It's always where the phone is when it started and now you can really Go and look into your data I think really this is a huge difference between having like a 3d that 2d plot Or 2d projection of your 3d things So you really can get into it. So below you see the where it found like the the plane the floor So in an advanced clinic would like calculate. Is it a floor or a desk and put it in different heights stuff like that But yeah, so there are some issues if you go like this you see from from behind. It's dark because I don't Yeah, but I think this is nice Is it okay for you if I take a picture of that? With you so and can is it for who is it not okay if I put that say on Twitter or stuff like that? Okay, then cheese good, so that's the AR version Now for the VR version Let's see Now I will need to Do like this and this and this So here the problem is I don't know whether we can maybe we can kill the lights or at all. I don't know whether that's possible So you will see it only just very faintly now In the in the middle here. I don't know whether you can see it. So yeah, that's the first thing a Little bit huh So yeah, that's the problem now We would need to get it closer to us know the data in order to be able to really see it so How do you navigate and now? Usually this cardboard thing you would have it like really here and you wouldn't see anything else Yeah, so you need to have something in your hands or in one of your hands That you kind of know so something like a game pad. So you could connect a game pad to that thing but probably most of you I Don't know maybe a door Europe height and more than in other circumstances don't have a game pad in the in their working environment So well, let's think about what do we have? Ah, yes, we have the workstation. No there. There's a keyboard So could we use that? I mean here we are typing in all the time. Yeah Okay, yeah, so we just need to get those keystrokes and push them to the phone So let's do that Maybe do it a little bit bigger This and now it needs to have the focus of the of the keyboard. So we click on it Ta-da and now you see you are like in who of you has ever played like a first-person shooter game So, you know ASDW probably so Now if I I never know which way around I did it because I couldn't test it that much So I'm pushing. I'm now Getting the data back to me. So I'm clicking on s So now I need to get it up Now you should see it much better. I know you don't see it at all like that So again, I Can get it up. I can push it back Down come back to me and now I'm through so I need to get back So basically if you know your your first-person shooter, and I guess you you do blind typing in first-person shooters You don't W Yes, so you know that by hand So if you are in the immerse situation You really can go through it and and really start examining all the things in 3d in VR Okay, so that's basically the demo part so just one For debugging purposes because that's the only thing that also works in the simulator. I have also the 3d part here And you there really see okay You can get to the data and you can explore it, but it's for sure not as nice as if you are doing it Maybe you see it. Yeah Okay, maybe go for you some of you might have come for the city's talk, so let's do the following Maybe even do it like this So you I guess most even if it's a international conference most of you might recognize this data set It's Switzerland But if you now go close to it So in the in the other direction so you really can start looking into these things But use that on the using that on the iPad is really amazing. So I like it a lot. So So just to finish a little bit So Yeah, the demo gets gods were willing so I don't need to show that slide. Oh It's not connected anymore So this slide is not needed, but I I hope you agree it works kind of So a little bit the architecture now is is really simple we have a Server in tornado that can run anywhere basically usually it runs on on your workstation where also your Jupiter runs In the Jupiter notebook you have an iframe that embeds this html controller you can so from the Jupiter the data gets posted to the To the server the iframe here the controller talks via a web socket to to the server to exchange to send the keystrokes And to exchange status so you know whether how many controllers are active and so on so basically here you see There's one device connected. There's one controller and it has focus. So if you go if it loses the focus Yeah, then the focus number goes down something like that would be nice also to show it's done in in the app I'm basically the server than is a broadcast mechanism. So all the the devices connect get the data right now via HTTP get and Get the keystrokes and the status via web sockets and Right now be careful. Everything is unencrypted and it's open to everybody who knows the IP address and the port So that's for sure something that if it gets bigger one needs to address Okay Do you want to have it? Good so you can pip install it right now from from github Currently, I hope that I push it to pipeline soon. You can get it for R. It's a slightly outdated version right now I will have that up in a couple of weeks the iOS app since I think two hours is on github Either you download that you clone the repository and install Xcode and you then you need to have a Free personal team setting there and then you can deploy it to your devices I think I will have soon something where I can push it like to a hundred devices worldwide if they gave me Give me the device number and then maybe via the app stores test flight I can even have like a shared public link eventually, but there it needs to go to the browser So I think the app is not ready yet And the Android app is there as well. So there are APKs on the releases Here as well slightly outdated Yeah, okay, so What do I think? Will do will be the next steps. So first of line first of all I would really like to have texts there. So my my dream demo for today would have been If it would have been running already say day before yesterday Say to get all the abstracts of the talks here puts stem through word to back so that every every talk gets like a Vector and then you can walk through the talks. So that would have been a really nice demo It's not that hard to do now Yeah, I hope that so stay tuned for that I'm also having lines or surfaces I don't know the ISS trajectory to see it really in 3d would be something I'd like to do or a flight Then make the scenery nicer Maybe don't have a black background or I don't know Put it onto all the Repositories and stores and then solidify the protocol and make everything like really working together. So that's Maybe I hope that by end of summer. I'm somewhere there Yeah, and then there are some other ideas HTTPS having that having something like an Authentification authorization actually Jupiter is a tornado server. So could we just plug into it? But I think it's it's not that easy You need to be careful with the async things. Maybe then it works Interface to plot legit plot then and maybe eventually have like some some new Data hub where you really can walk where you can publish your data sets and people can walk through them stuff like that That would be really nice. So Yeah, thanks to all the Giants shoulders. I'm standing on Also my employer To send me here Also to Euro-Python to accepting this talk so that I finally could bring it forward and to all the future contributors of these open source projects Thanks Okay, I think we have a couple of minutes for questions. So there's a microphone over there I've got one here. Anybody has any questions? Yeah, do you have an idea how to get users for that? Like, you know, like you're talking about Technical stuff right now, but it would be like really nice. That's like lots of people are using it. So where is I Once worked like the proteins and stuff. So various like online database with 150,000 Proteins like it's like 3d structures and they have like a lot of tools So to plug such finger on this is like in my eyes It should be like pretty nice because people are using it not here. That's probably not in your workplace, but the yeah Biologists all over place. So yeah, that's I guess an idea and probably a question, but I don't know Yeah, thanks. Yeah, I think actually this isn't like constrained to to data science plots I mean having something where people can by some means produce some 3d things and Then just being able to look at it in in their devices and I mean Apple really is announcing now in a beta version What is it called reality composer or something like that where where you can start building things to your AR kit things I guess that's the same direction. I'm more now on where I'm coming from so I Think it's it's yeah, you you can use it for for many things. So Yeah, so maybe if you if you're willing you can write a converter that just gets out the data points and Then we we can just grab all of those proteins and Publish them in a in a in an AR view. Maybe they haven't done that yet and for us now It would be just the conversion then having it Yeah, thank you for your talk So my question is have you actually tried it in house for practical things? And what were the results because with these first-person through the shooter? We know that these experiences can be pretty immersive and well It's kind of we navigate it from the technical side, of course, it's bleeding edge of interfaces It's like very interesting technology to play with but I'm interested more like Reception side or neuro psychology side of these things. Are they really make people work and analyze this data more efficient? Yeah, we will see. So that's the test of time. No, I Think actually the AR thing is nicer for that because Really the VR thing It's too Too occlusive so you are really in in the data and it might be something cool to do but maybe not that practical I think the AR thing is much more if you really can just push it onto your phone And then look at it like if it was was standing there on your desk and you can look at it And if it's no hassle, so that's that's the key point. It's no hassle if it's no hassle I think then it it could be really beneficial. Yes I mean in in corporate environments. There is the problem of Do you get the the data from your? Through the firewall to your device, I guess there will be a problem So I'm not sure how to address that yet. Maybe one can push it through through the QR code actually now that I'm thinking of so there's some Developments that allow browsers to render augmented reality images there So you are talking about web XR for instance. Yeah. Yeah, so there the AR needs really like a barcode anchor So I mean we could just have that on the display and then it's like anchor to the display It could work I Kind of don't like that too much personally. I don't know why so I thought I really want to go for the app there Because there it's really you don't need that anchor. So you can also show it then at lunch to somebody or show your newest plot to your Significant other in the evening. So, you know But yeah, I mean that that certainly would be to to to have it In an HTML version, I think that would be the way to go right now. Yes Okay, any other questions? No, then I would like a big round of applause


From Las Vegas, Nevada, it's theCUBE, covering IBM World of Watson 2016. Brought to you by IBM. Now, here are your hosts, John Furrier and Dave Vellante. Okay, welcome back everyone. We are live here in Las Vegas in Mandalay Bay for the IBM World of Watson. This is the new rebrand of IBM Insight and they brought together all the big data, all the cloud, all the analytics. And certainly, Watson is the headline brand and certainly driving a lot of activity around the future of analytics, whether that's big data in software or IoT or connected device or AI. It's all great stuff, a lot of interest. This is theCUBE, I'm John Furrier with my co-host, Dave Vellante, our next guest, Jason McGee, who's the IBM Fellow VP and CT of IBM Cloud Platform at IBM. Welcome back to theCUBE, great to see you. Yeah, good to be here again. So a couple of big news, get out of the way. We just put a blog post that SoftLayer is now being sun-setted for the Bluemix brand. The Bluemix will be the main brand SoftLayer will just be infrastructure to service or IaaS. But Bluemix is cool, that's where the action is and that's where you're seeing the most traction and certainly you're doing a lot of work in the air. We've been covering Bluemix, both on SiliconANGLE and our analyst group at Wikibon and we launched it on theCUBE a couple of years ago. Yeah, years ago, yeah. Meg Swanson on and Adam Gunther saying, hey, here's Bluemix and then record downloads and then the rest has been history, huge growth. What's the update? What's this current state of the union? I'll say the Bluemix brand, what's the big update? Yeah, so first just a touch on the SoftLayer thing. I mean, we've been on this journey for a year now to kind of bring the properties together. You know, we believe really firmly that cloud is a platform that spans infrastructure all the way up through these high level domain services like Watson. You know, building apps I think is where it's all at. You know, infrastructure is an incredibly important part of running workloads, but you really need those higher level services. If I look at what's going on with Bluemix today, being here at Watson I think is really appropriate because those high level services like Cognitive and what we're doing at IoT, those are driving huge developer interest, some amazing applications on Bluemix that are getting built and so that kind of breadth of the platform and having all of those APIs is really driving so much excitement around the Bluemix. So the announcement is a branding, a rebranding? It's more than a rebranding. So certainly from a branding perspective we're consolidating on Bluemix as the IBM Cloud platform brand, but it also is bringing the properties together. So one user experience for our clients, one portal, one identity to log in with. It's a cloud. Oh, it didn't work like that already? Right, of course it did, but I don't know what you're talking about. So the experience is getting much better. That all launched on Sunday, so now we have a much more consistent platform for people to build that platform. I want to drill down on the point you made about Watson because I think Watson, and we always said this on theCUBE, gives a face to some of the realities and problems and opportunities that people can write software for or build SaaS applications. So it's nice to see that, I won't say pie in the sky, but a clear, straight, narrow path to value. And so Bluemix is getting accelerated because of what Watson I know is available on Bluemix. That's driving a lot of developer adoption. So what are the top, so given that the context, you're seeing a lot of business opportunity, a lot more developers are getting on the front lines in the business conversation. What are some of the hot areas that you're seeing right now for activity in that specific build out phase of cloud apps, certainly SaaS certification apps? Yeah, it's interesting. I think if you look at the Watson angle first, I mean, I think a lot of people at first think it's like, some experimental space, but it's been incredible to me how many real applications people are building doing. I had a session that I did yesterday where we talked about some of those use cases where people are doing drones with video recognition to actually do in the field maintenance and mapping. And that's not some experiment, but it's like real stuff that they're doing that are taking people off of towers and replacing them with devices. All the speech recognition capabilities certainly are real. And I think having that in the bigger platform of Bluemix has been really powerful because you put those apps together, of course you need containers and you need data services and you need analytics. You need to be able to bring all those pieces together to build a real solution. And Bluemix kind of provides that foundation for them to do that. We all had kind of a wake up call last week with the hacks that shut down, not shut down, but slowed down a lot of them. And the culprit was like DVRs and IP cameras that had factory settings and passwords. And so when you think about some of these emerging applications, of course security becomes a part of that. How are you dealing with that challenge? Yeah, I mean, it's really interesting, right? How no matter what error we're in, we seem to make the same mistakes on security over and over again. And so now you have this incredible wave of devices out there that are, as you say, kind of fundamentally insecure because people don't even think to manage them, right? It's not even in their mindset. I change the password out of the box. I just plug the thing into my house and I don't even know how it works, right? And so I think as a call provider, certainly there's a challenge there on both helping people building, let's say IOT applications, to be able to manage those from us, to manage those devices. A big part of I think the IOT space is how do you actually manage all the devices that are connecting into the applications on the cloud? And of course there's a network and security dimension too, is how do we build a resilient platform that can resist those kinds of attacks? But it's a real challenge, I think, for the whole industry and certainly it pushes on some weak points in the internet around DNS and how to secure that space. Well, this brings up the service area and this is something that's been in tired conversations on theCUBE, certainly, but we've always said IOT increases your service area. There is no perimeter. This is case in point. Absolutely the default password is one. But also the notion of patching and updating becomes an issue. And this is something that doesn't, it's nuanced a little bit, we all know that patch upgrades is where people attack. Right, absolutely. People are lazy, generally speaking. So this is where Agile is interesting. So what's your take on this as a CTO? This is one of the benefits of auto provisioning. Absolutely, yeah. This is one of the benefits of revision management of Agile. Is this going to be an opportunity to close that gap there as a key vector of security? Yeah, I certainly think it's one of those watershed moments that I think will drive some of the conversation forward. I mean, if I look at the space that we all like to call cognitive, which is a little bit of a buzzword, but that whole space is really driven by some of these ideas of how do I get a proper CI-CD pipeline in place? If you'll get things like containers and the emergence of containers, I think part of what's underlying that is getting away from this patch and upgrade maintenance model for software and getting to a model where things are more replaceable, easily provisionable. And that helps with these kinds of problems. It doesn't solve it, you still have to update things but the pain and the cost of doing those upgrades and keeping up to date on your software is the heck of a lot easier. Well, this is where the cognitive engine can come in. So for instance, if there's analytics on devices that are connected to the network, if there's default passwords that aren't changed, for instance, that should notify. And those spaces are exactly where we're working. So for example, in our container space, we've been doing a lot of work around scanning analytics on the container contents, the actual software that's running in those containers to give people insight into vulnerabilities and problems. And the next step of that journey is actually watching the runtime behavior and using cognitive capabilities to actually analyze that execution time behavior of applications and give people insights on, you have this problem of vulnerability or this behavior pattern that's hitting your app that I haven't seen before. So I think there's huge opportunity to kind of apply these techniques. Okay, so to connect with doctors, the hard question I want to bring in the heat here on the fastball to you is, companies are looking for a state-of-the-art cloud because IoT connects to the cloud, data at the edge, which you're saying the goodness of the cognitive is really cool. I totally agree with that. But at the end of the day, the customers see the security hack go, whoa, put the brakes on. So the mindset is, great, I need state-of-the-art cloud to enable my edge of the network to be completely secure. What are some of the criteria for customers as they evaluate state-of-the-art cloud to enable pure security? I mean, so I think first and foremost, state-of-the-art cloud means that that cloud platform has a perspective on how to move forward with building applications. Security is part of that story, right? How we manage the platform, the network has to be ingrained in the kind of cloud-native platform that you're building on. And so I think you have to look for what characteristics of security have been embedded in that platform? Was it an afterthought? Is it a built-in? Are the policies there? Is the visibility built into the platform? It's in the design class, not an afterthought. In the design, it's not an afterthought in the cloud, right? And you see that in lots of ways. You see that in features that exhibit themselves in the platform. You see that in how the system is managed. Some of these challenges, just like the one we saw last week, those are big, hard challenges. That was a pretty impactful event across the whole internet. And the places in the internet that did survive mostly survived because they were in attack. Not because they did something better. They just happened not to be the target that day. DDoS is like a port scan these days. It's a kiddie script or kind of a hacks, but it's at scale is an interesting problem. It's an interesting problem. So if they're doing DDoS's now, they got a slew of other potential opportunities. This is where the action is. Containers and microservices really play here. Can you expand your thoughts on where, why that's important to have a container and a strong microservices strategy? Yeah, I think there's, to me, there's three things. I mean, first off, everyone's always after, how can I build things faster? And I really think, we've been incrementally working that problem for many years, but I think the whole phenomenon around containers and microservice based development is a step function in speed of development, right? But on top of that, you get this whole scale problem. Like not only do I have to build fast, but then I need to be able to scale quickly, right? And I think in today's world, with everyone being digital and connected, the odds of you, if you hit success growing to scale quickly, are much higher than they've ever been. You don't get this nice, slow ramp. And I think containers enable an architecture to help that. And then the final thing is, at the end of the day, cloud is about rental economics. And so you always want to run with just the minimum amount of resource you need for right now. And so those architectural patterns enable that. You can run just as much resource. So I think those three things combine to really drive that foundation. Can we talk about paths to the cloud for your customers?  I guess formerly known as software. You got obviously the blue mix piece and you have this collection of SaaS sort of riding above. How are you advising customers to get to the cloud? What are the different options? Everybody's talking about hybrid, but clearly everybody wants a cloud strategy. So what's my path to get there? Yeah, so our view is a couple of things. One, there's a breadth of workload, a multiple entry points that you have to deal with. So there's a strong kind of new application to develop and trend like we were just talking about with containers and microservices. There's also a lift and shift, if you will, or bring existing workloads to the cloud path. So for example, our partnership with VMware is a good manifestation of that where we can help clients take all these existing workloads and bring them into the cloud relatively unchanged and give them that on-ramp. So part of it is just about breadth and having different entry points for people depending on what their motivations are and where their journey is, but then delivering in a way that's connected so that you can cross those boundaries and you can move from one scenario to the next. And so we've been focused on that breadth and then the other dimension has been delivery models. Public cloud, local on-premise cloud and dedicated models and being able to mix and match those as you see fit and as you have different kind of regulatory and policy. And we talked earlier about the sort of, the experience coming together is the, from an on-prem and public, are you trying to get that experience to be similar or is it partially similar? You used to be involved in pure systems, I think. That business has somewhat changed when you guys sold the X86 business, but what's that experience like? That's one of the areas where I think we've done really well in the market, is that we have a consistent story with Bluemix across public, dedicated, local where it's the same experience, it's the same services. They're all delivered as a service even on-prem so it's still a cloud service model, not a software delivery model. And so you really do get that same experience across all those systems or all those paths without having to kind of know how to manage it, interact with it differently, set it up differently. And that's very different than what our competitors are doing. Okay, and then you mentioned the VMware partnership and then AWS and VMware did a partnership last week. The narrative in the trade press was, oh, this Trump's IBM's deal, what's your response to that? Yeah, I don't see it that way at all. I mean, one, it's a competitive market. It's going to happen with multiple players. We're in market now. We have over a thousand clients now. We have at least seven more months before they have anything out there. And I think more importantly, we have the relationships with the clients who find that solution valuable.  It was night and day. I mean, we're doing real work with that VMware partnership today that Amazon is striving to get to in the future. Well, a year from now, they'll have another one. Yeah, a year from now, they'll have something. But that, why would- You have Apple hidden gem in there too. It's the Apple deal last year on stage was a huge differentiator. And cognitive, right?  Why wouldn't any large cloud player want to do some kind of deal like that with VMware that has this huge enterprise footprint? But ultimately, isn't it a trip into the public cloud? Yeah, yeah, ultimately it is. It is about kind of moving those workloads into a public cloud context. And I do think, you know, that's why Amazon and Google tried and everyone has wanted those models because there's an endemic workload there that people are trying to get to the cloud. Just don't see how that's a losing proposition for any cloud provider, not just IBM.  We have that capability now. So that absolutely provides some advantage. And you got a World of Watson developer event coming up that's going to be in San Francisco on November 9th. Let's just give Meg Swanson her team a plug on that. If you're in San Francisco, I want to check it out. But I'll bring up the enterprise developer cloud. Because I think there's a huge opportunity that no one's talking about. We're seeing it in our Wikibon research team who have identified that a new persona has emerged. A new psychographic profile that did not exist until this generation. And that is a business-minded developer. And the reason is, many things, one, is more focused on entrepreneurship. They see all these companies going public, all the unicorns. But more importantly, with digital transformation, the role of the developers on the front lines, more and more, portion of the developer community have to be aware of what CAPX is, what OPEX is, buzzwords and business models. But yet they don't want to get an MBA. So we're seeing this new business-minded developer. So the enterprise is actually creating this new class of developer. And the question is, you guys are adding 20, the question to you is, as you guys see your traction, which is from my notes talking to the folks in strategy, is 20,000 developers a week you're adding. That's pretty freaking impressive. A million over the past year, you're onboarding a lot of developers. I know it's a corporate focus, there's a lot of marketing behind that. But you got meat on the bone with Bluemix. What's this, can you share any insights around this new persona, around this business-minded developer? Because again, the apps are the business now. Yeah, to me, I think that the emergence of that persona is actually kind of a manifestation of the complexity of building these solutions going down. I mean, you look at call platform, I talked about this in my talk yesterday, like there's such amazing innovation, like from five years ago to today, on hardware, on services, I mean, all the AI stuff we're doing in Watson, like try to do that five years ago, and now it's an API call. And so I think the bar to build these solutions has gone down so much, that it's allowed all these developers to not think about the technology and not think about the infrastructure, but actually think about, well, what problem can I solve?  And so I think- The speed of getting a valued product out is fast. It's fast. And the cost is low. They're driving the bus. So it's just like how do I compose these things together and I can do it relatively cheaply, very quickly, and experiment with something in the market. So I just think it drives, you know, there's more time to spend your energies on innovating and being entrepreneurial. So I love the business value discussion and I don't usually like to get in the weeds too much, but we have some experience with the IBM cloud. We have some experience with AWS. We use multiple clouds. Monitoring tools to understand sort of what's happening. You know, where are you with that maturity? Should we be using third-party tools, like New Relic, for example, or are there native tools that we should be using? Our developers say, okay, maybe it's a learning curve thing for them, but give us the update there. So there are certainly native tools that are built in around log collection analytics and metrics monitoring that are part of the platform. We think that's a really important part of the platform. There's also, of course, integrations with some of the other players, like New Relics, Data Dogs, and others that have great products that really give you some great insights. I think there's some untapped spaces still. An obvious one to me is microservices. You know, if you really build a microservice app, actually understanding how all these pieces are talking to each other and connected in the failure modes, that's a pretty nascent area in the monitoring space that I think needs lots of investment. For everybody, right, for everybody, right. That, you know, I think you'll see some focus from us over the coming months on, you know, giving people that insight as you adopt those kinds of models.  Lumix is the cloud's first public cloud option targeting developers to build new cloud-native workloads. True, but not the only. But not, I agree with that. But, again, but if you take on what you guys are doing, Visa, Visa, Amazon, web services, you have a lot of experience working with other vendors, so what's interesting to me, and you certainly had the Apple announcement last year, was a huge differentiator. I want to ask about that a little bit later, but you have validation with AT&T, it did a deal with them. Box.net, or now Box.com, Workday, all IBM-exclusive deals, and again, this is the multi-vendor strategy, rendering itself out, so how do you talk about that, because that's different than AWS. But the developers still want to do native cloud, but might want to integrate Box, or Workday, or something. So I think, you know, look, I guess that our strategy is about breadth, choice with consistency, having those different entry points. You know, we firmly believe we have to have a world-class cloud-native platform, that's where people want to build going forward, but lots of people are not there, and there's all these other scenarios that have to be dealt with today, and those deals with guys like Box and Workday, you know, we think we have some real value to bring to them, and our global footprint, and bringing them into other geographies, and they also, frankly, teach us a lot, right? I mean, there's a great synergy there, where we bring those workloads into our cloud, they teach us a lot about different kinds of workloads that scale to help improve the platform. I just want to get into operational questions. We were talking before we came on camera here about IBM Go, which is our new software we push for the IBM events, and it's all on a new API, new CMS with APIs. On software, we ported it from Amazon, so all cool. But what's interesting is we're talking about how now the new developer architecture is slinging APIs around. Why would I want to go build a monolithic software application when I can build a cloud-native workload on BlueMix? That's a SaaS app, but then dealing with other services like Box, right, for file sharing and collaboration, potentially, or Workday for HR, I'm connecting to them just, I don't, it's easy. Yeah, it is. We're just slinging APIs around. Yeah, I think that kind of compositional style is how new apps are built, right? Like, if you're building something new, you're going to build it with containers and microservices and APIs and connecting APIs together. I mean, that's just how I think things are going to get built. Now, there's lots of existing stuff you have to connect to that you have to transform and you have to move and there's capability needed for that, but the new stuff I think that style that we're seeing emerge is there for a reason because you can do some powerful things. And you know, I told a story yesterday about a partnership we did with the USA Cycling and the Rio Olympics.  That's exactly what Blumix is sexier than Softlayer in my opinion. What I loved, yeah, no doubt. What I loved about that story is the athlete was saying, we used to have all this data. We just, we couldn't get, make sense out of it and we couldn't get it in real time. Yeah, they got it the next morning. The cloud totally changed that experience in real time and allowed us to change our behavior. And in some non-obvious ways too, like one of the big things for them was the whole solution was in the cloud. So when they went from venue to venue at competitions, all they had to do was bring the bike with the phone on the back. They didn't need anything else. They had no servers to set up and drag with them. They just brought the bike and did their thing and they all got beamed back to Blumix and they could get that out. Real-time feedback as opposed to go faster. Right, right, exactly, go faster. Jason, great to see you. CTO of the IBM cloud and IBM Fellow loves to go on the weed. So ping him on Twitter, what's your Twitter handle? J.R. McGee. J.R. McGee, great, great guest. Thanks for sharing your insight. Yeah, great to be here. IBM cloud, we were there from the beginning with Blumix and 20,000 developers a week. Congratulations, great success. Again, this enterprise is creating a whole new persona and a lot of opportunities. We'll be back with more live coverage from World of Watson after this short break.


The nature of life is such, one is packed into the other, other is packed into this and this and this and this. It will not be realized because you dissect it, which is all you can do with your intellect. Your intellect is a scalpel which is trying to dissect life. Are you married? If you want to really know your wife, today you must take a scalpel and dissect her. All the beauty of who she is, if you want to know, you must dissect her, isn't it? No, it will become ugly, it will not become beautiful. That's all you're trying to do. You're trying to know the existence. Using this scalpel of your intellect, dissecting it, it will only become ugly, it will not become beautiful. So, intellect, which is a simple silly tool, which is useful to handle material aspects of life. You have raised it to heaven, you are giving it the glory of heaven and think this is everything. Whatever you see, you want to cut it and see. If you cut open things and see, you will know one aspect of reality. You will not know the whole of it. If you open up this man, you may see how the heart is doing dupu dupu, but you will not know this man. You will not know the most vital aspect of who he is, all the other details you will know. So, with this, how far will you go? Physicality is all that you can cut, isn't it? Yes? Physicality is the only thing you can cut. Can you cut something which is not physical? And all you got is a knife. Okay, you also have a wife, but I'm sure she doesn't let it use it on her, your intellect. Does she? She'll immediately put an end to it because she knows this is not going to go anywhere. That's one thing about women.  It's not by cutting that you will know. It is by inclusion that you will know that your intellect cannot do it, can only chop. Chopping vegetables are okay. Life doesn't work like that. You can't chop life and know it. You have to include it, only then you know it. That's a different dimension of intelligence which intellect cannot do.


The United States has provided $127,000 grant for the Documentation and Cultural Preservation Project for the Osho-Shogo sacred grove, particularly the Busan Shrine. The Consul-General of the United States, Clare Brangelo and her team went round on an inspection of the grove. The move is part of efforts to ensure the grove is given a first left, especially the Busan Shrine, one of eight monuments within the grove. She disclosed that work will commence on the site in the next few days. The Atar-Jav Osho-Bo-Ovajima Olanipeku was on hand during the inspection tour of the grove. They voted the American government for their gesture towards promoting culture and tourism. Today, this project, this launch, is to award to digitally document trained professionals because our teams are working with your teams of local experts and to conserve the Busan Shrine here in the ocean of the sacred grove. We just hope that this is the beginning of a long and fruitful partnership with the people of Osho and your cultural heritage. So thank you all so much for being with us today. This place is so special. You can see we're right on the banks of the Onshun River in this beautiful part of Nigeria and it's my honor to work with the National Commission of Museums and Monuments and the Adunio Larisha Trust to take the first step in documenting this incredible structure that has so many amazing stories to tell. You've heard of the connection with Arkavyece of Osho-Un-State with this very shrine and I'm really excited to partner on this project, do the 3D documentation to serve as a master plan for future restoration efforts of this place. I pray that our relationship will continue this way so that we will have every cause to thank you for your achievements. God bless you, ever, to success. I appreciate the government of Osho-Un-State that has backed on promotion of tradition, culture and humanity.