Πώς να σας δούμε την προσφασία της ΕΕΕΕΕΛΑΚΛΑΚΙΣ, Είστε σε μια οικονομική ευκαιρία. Θα αφήσω να καινούρας το παιδί μου, σε αυτή την εξακτάσταση του μηνύχου του Σύρφου Αυρίου, όσο το επίπεδο της Ευρωπή Νακτήρου Αυριό. Ο επίπεδο της Ευρωπή Νακτήρου Αυρίου είναι να δώσουμε από την Ευρωπή Νακτήρου Αυρίου για να πούμε στις συγχώρεις τέχνικες και να φανταξούν τα εσάρια σου σχέσης για τα τέχνικα ή στις στις στις σχέσεις. Το name είναι Ερίνη Καραχρήστου. Σήμερα θα μιλήσουμε την συμφωνία, για να συμφωνήσουμε την παρακολουσία within our timeline. Είδαμε τη σκόπω της συμφωνίας μας, που θα συμφωνήσουμε με την παρακολουσία της ΜΕΣΙΣΙΣ και Ναταλία Μανολά, η�εδιότητα της ΟΗΤΩΕΣΕΣ, η Θυνα στον ΕΗΑΡΑΣΟΑΣ, θα μην Χάσουμε την ΕΟΑΖΑ ΤΟΡΑΙΣ, καλύτερα σχέση τρεις. Σ difícil τρεις, θα αποκομμάζουμε την προσταθία της παρακολουσίας, και μέχρι αυτών των παρακολουσίαθεν, θα ακούουμε και ανάπτυξεςδελίες, να επιβλώσουμε η δημιλησία του ΕΕΙΑΡΑΥ. Αννοώ, όμως, για να αποκλείψω αυτή η σημερινή, θα σας δώσω μια αδερφή από τα πιο σημερινή σημερινή σημερινή αδερφή για τέντρες. Η συμμερινή θα είναι έτοιμη με τη σημερινή σημερινή συμμερινή, όπου εσείς αντιμετωπίζει την ευκαιρία, μπορεί να αντιμετωπίζει τις εύκολες σημερινές στιγμή και στιγμή στιγμή. Αν δεν έχεις ήδη κάποιες σημερινές, θα δώσω τη σημερινή για η Άνταλία Μανολά. Ευχαριστούμε. Μπορεί να σας δώσω τη σημερινή. Ευχαριστούμε για την εμπειρία μου. Δεν θα δώσω πολύ στρατηγικά στήματα. Νομίζω ότι πολλοί της κομμάτους που κομμάται, και ποιος θέλουμε να πάμε. Θα δώσω μία τρία ή τρία πόντες. Λοιπόν, όπως όλοι ξέρουν το Άνταλία Μανολά, είναι ένα πρόγραμμα, το Άνταλία Πρόγραμμα της Ευρωπαϊκής Ευρώπης. Νομίζω ότι είναι η τρία ή τρία πόντες, στις 2009 που ξεκινήσαμε. Και αυτή είναι η στιγμή, τα στιγμή, είναι τα τρία πόντες. Πιστεύω ότι πρέπει να δημιουργήσει, να δημιουργήσει, the National Open Access Desks network that we have, which is a network in every European country, a representative organization in every European country, fostering open access to publications, data, other research works and open science in general. The second strategic priority is training, how to build the training, a training infrastructure in Europe από cold to fostered open science and training is around many issues. It's training about policies, training is about research data management, it's about open access to publications, it's all about it. And then third is the services, this is where we come in. So from the start and from the beginning of open air, we have a service oriented infrastructure. Δ Rest Explain We have a list of services that you can browse through in catalogue.openair.eu you can reach it through our side and we have different services. Services that are addressing content providers so for example we have services for repositories in open access journals how to register and validate the metadata schema in OpenER and be visible to you up in the world Είμαστε δημιουργές για πόρτα των προβλήτων, για να αλλάξουν μεταδέτα με το μπροκρό σύστημα. Είμαστε δημιουργές για οι δημιουργές, που είναι πιο δυνατό, δημιουργές για την ΣΥΜΑΡΙΑ, πιστεύουμε αυνηγία, που είναι ο δημιουργός της εξοδογής. Τώρα, εξοδογές στιγμούν αργώσεις, που είναι η δημιουργή της εξοδογής. Είμαστε δημιουργές, που χρησιμοποιηθούν αυτή η εξοδογή, όπως οι σχολογές, οι σχολογές, που είναι η δημιουργία της δημιουργίας. Και πιστεύω, που θα μεταδειδημιούν, αλλά αυτή, φυσικά, η δημιουργή που θα μιλάμε, είναι η δημιουργή της εξοδογής. Αν we are trying to build the scholarly communication graph with participants around the world, with collaborators around the world. So as you have seen, I think maybe for the second time is that we aim, as an infrastructure, we cover from the layer from the universities to the value-added services for research communities, for funders, for everyone who wants to do something in scholarly communication. So our three challenges is about how to empower the challenge number one is next generation repositories, is how can we have services that we cannot do ourselves, but we can empower repository platforms like ePrinz, do this space, now Lyosys, and other repository platforms in order for them to come to the next level, what we call the next generation repositories. There is a core listing of new functionalities that we would like to delve into. Then the second topic is value-added products for open science, and I think this is based mainly on the graph that we are producing. How can somebody take a graph and produce value-added services for various stakeholders, and this could be from researchers. Now, for example, how can I get my CV based on that to funders proper monitoring, to research communities, how to publish, and then the third challenge is the enhancement of current services and technology of OpenAir, because of OpenAir is a data infrastructure, a big data infrastructure. We take millions of contents around the world. We met the data and also data or text. We text data mine, we duplicate, we clean, we use API, so there is a lot of machinery on the back of OpenAir, and services that would make it more robust or more performant would be very welcome. All of this, I have to say, is in the remit of the European OpenScience Cloud that many of you have heard. So OpenAir is a pillar of the European OpenScience Cloud. The word I'm trying is strengthening the OpenScience. This is the world that I was looking for, strengthening OpenScience and working with research infrastructures, big data or small research infrastructures, how to make this publishing workflow start from day one and then how to make data discovery for them or how to make data more visible for them. And this is because this is a European infrastructure and in the course of the European projects we are not able to fund as a means for particular tasks because we mean that we give a preference to particular SMEs or particular solutions. This is why we have the open calls because we want all of you to come and work with us or and see what you can offer. And this is I think our aim. Thank you Natalia for this fruitful presentation of the OpenAir Advanced Long Term Strategy, Scope and Activities. Are there any questions at this point? Okay. If not, then I think that we can proceed with topic one Next Generation Repositories. Johan, if you are ready, I will share the presentation that you sent me earlier with the participants. Is it clear? You can tell me when you want me to proceed to the next slide. Thank you. Good morning. My name is Johan Schilwagen from Bielefeld University part of the technical team in OpenAir and among other tasks responsible for work package called Towards the Scholarly Commons and part of this work package is on Next Generation Repositories. However, the idea of Next Generation Repositories was born in the context of the core organization of Open Access Repositories. A working group was initiated in 2016 and this was done for a couple of reasons on the next slide. For instance, the crisis of the institutional repositories. Some aspects are of course also valid for catch-all or disciplinary repositories but sometimes some aspects are also different. So here are two examples already three years ago published that criticizes institutional repositories regarding pure usability for instance because there is a very heterogeneous landscape that lack of agreement on common standards and this makes it often a challenge to aggregate not only the metadata but also the digital objects in a high quality way. Then another aspect often criticized now is the protocol or IPMH to collect metadata records while this promising approach by the beginning of the 2000 years as a common denominator interchange protocol for repositories it is now no longer up to date due to other more modern web standards and to issues regarding lack of support of other formats than XML because of performance issues content application and so on. Moreover the repositories in general have a difficult rule on the one side they are the backbone of open access community of open access infrastructures like openair they are used to fulfill several open access mandates by funders most recently the plan S for instance however they are not well acknowledged by researchers especially institutional repositories because they have not the same priority like the paper in the scientific journal and usually a repository is not a virtual place where researchers would meet going to the next slide there are some aspects that need to be improved one of them is a limitation and functionalities repositories are often acting as data silos there are only a few global aggregators like openair like core like the referencia but mainly the issues are a lack of social interaction functionalities and issues in regarding technical interoperability on the next slide we will see that now the core next generation repositories vision comes into place which asks to position repositories as a foundation for distributed globally networked infrastructure for scholarly communication and here it is important to build value added services on top of these repository infrastructures another aspect is also that in the past repositories were seen as the object where the interaction would take place however more importantly is to make the resource that is deposited in the repository as the priority entity in the web to make it interactive to machines on the one side but also to researchers and to the public on the next slide there are some challenges mentioned one set is to build value added services but also to better integrate repositories in the research life cycle and to build innovative scholarly services on top of repositories and also the operation aspect is important to make sure that repositories are collectively managed by scholarly communities and not by a few monopolies in the world improving repository functionality means to make the resources meaning the digital objects an integral part of the web very important here is also to standardize the data exchange on a global scale and to by adoption of modern web standards and protocols and in the end it's important not only to support literature or research data or software but any kind of digital research results in repositories the next slide identifies several behaviors of next generation repositories which are recommended by these working group in core these behaviors are a result of collecting several use cases and also by collecting feedback from the repository community I don't want to go through all these 11 behaviors hear me I'm sorry I had a problem with my connection I couldn't hear you ok I'm sorry I think that we maybe solved it ok I'm still in this slide ok so how does you could hear everything sorry it was maybe the internet no problem so in a project like open air at once we cannot cover of course all the mentioned behaviors so we selected a couple of them concentrated on resource discovery and better content transfer open metrics and annotation of content on the next slide and with regard to these call for tenders could you move to the next slide please we propose several activities of course this list is not complete just a few ideas meaning that we would suggest more software platforms that support modern standards like resource sharing and signposting which of course make sense to implement in platforms that are mainly used in the repository world which is for instance Dispace 5 and Dispace 6 also ePrince and also several derivates of Fedora for instance we also suggest to build on the current open air user statistics service in open air with regard to more innovative visualization techniques which would allow a better analysis of usage of resources and from the data sources on the next slide I will suggest a little bit more detail some use cases so starting with the issue that for instance open air can collect bibliographic metadata records from over to a thousand 500 data sources on the other side the issue since the beginning is to uniquely identify the full text in the metadata records and here the resource sync could come into play and a scenario is visualized in the figure implemented by CORE in the UK using resource sync which collects metadata and the full text from publishers and makes these links available for synchronization with other services and open air is already using it by implementing a resource sync client and collecting metadata and full text from publishers open access publishers via CORE the next slide suggests the implementation and scenarios based on signposting to discover and navigate content on landing pages by head of type links in HTTP link headers so this is a rather I would say low level approach where for instance the HTTP header of a web resource is analyzed and the links contained in the header are evaluated by help of their relation and their type so for instance I get immediately information how to cite these particular resource I get information on citation formats like Biptash information in which format I could access the resource let it be a zip file or let it be a specific format like pdf or html and I get information of identifiers related to the authors that created the resource another example concerns the user statistics open air already user events and counter reports from over 150 data sources provides simple visualization on the repository level and on the item level in the open air portal however it would be interesting to build more kinds of visualization based on user statistics and provide filters that are built on different aggregation levels using different parameters like on the repository level, on the item level but also user statistics that can be compared by topic discipline do graphical region and also interesting would be to analyze user statistics in relation with other kinds of centimetric indicators the last example is the annotation of content where now already since two years web standard is defined the WF3C web annotation standard and this is an interesting idea that could improve implementations for open peer review where a reviewer is able to annotate the content that was created by another person and to make these annotations visible using well established standards coming to the selection criteria regarding this topic it's entirely important to align with the existing open-air interoperability standards namely the open-air guidelines for content providers which exist for different types of sources like repositories, journals chris systems but also for different kinds of resource types like textual publications research data software and other research products another selection criteria is the level of innovation so it would be interesting not only to see just the implementation of one of the suggested protocols but also concrete demonstrations or prototypes that showcase how these new standards can be used to improve behavior for repositories and finally improve these scholarly communication and of course the proposals should also have an impact on the existing open-air services and last but not least on its stakeholders ok thank you thank you very much Johan for this presentation and I'm sorry for the earlier inconvenience due to the internet connection there is one question if the presentations will be available after the webinar I believe that our presenters will be willing to share their presentations would it be feasible Johan? Yes I think this is the idea ok thank you and ok let's proceed with the presentations of Paolo for topics 2 and 3 and then the participants may gather their questions in total and maybe we can discuss the different issues Paolo you will have 30 minutes to present topics 2 and 3 and I can make you a presenter if you want to share with us your screen Yes please Just give me one minute Can you see it? Yes I can see it So good morning everybody So in this presentation I have to go through a long list of services that we're building in open-air So since we don't have much time I preferred I opted for an in-depth description on what we call the open-air research graph and then a more light weight let's say level of detail with respect to other services that we build on top of the graph So first of all let me try let me start with a general introduction of what we're doing today in open-air So technically speaking we are building a large collection of metadata records describing all let's say kind of entities you can find in the scholarly communication record So ranging from metadata about publications, data software etc to metadata of entities that you would rather use to monitor research impact or provides scientific reward to your institutions and scientists such as affiliation information so organization funder information project information link to funder also the data sources from which we collect the information So we build basically a graph what we call the open-air research graph So the first thing that we do in that direction is to collect from external data sources We strongly rely on the repositories that are today providing storage and the position and persistence to all the results of science as Jochen was suggesting So those repositories are out there today they already contain metadata and files regarding these objects and other sources out there are already improving content from repositories by aggregating them, harmonizing them provided links where these were not available enriching them with information originally available and therefore providing use cases and applications that are specific to certain contexts For example, Unpaywall collects Crossref and identifies the open access links to open access versions of the articles in Crossref and that's a very useful operation to do So what we do in open-air is to collect all such sources We provide also guidelines as Jochen mentioned These guidelines are basically instructions for data source managers to export metadata in a homogeneous as much as possible homogeneous way to simplify the process of collection and aggregation These guidelines are not available for all kind of sources Of course, in several cases we need to take on board on our shooter the harmonization process So to give you an example we collect for example from Market, DataSide we collect from open access publishers from aggregators of open access publishers like DOAJ and so on As a specific use case we also collect from research infrastructure sources and this is quite new with respect to the general context of scholarly communication and that's because we believe that there are many data sources that live today in the context of specific scientific research infrastructures for example Partinos, Epos etc that contain objects that are useful for science both in terms of reproducibility of science itself for example the workflows used to perform a given experiment and in terms of attribution of the scientists who've been producing them because of course we need to attribute these products to the scientists who have been part of their effort and their skills So when we collect these metadata records we build a graph whose high level data model is depicted here You see the product is at the center and we have different classes of products which are publications intended as literature stuff so objects digital objects that are intended to be read by humans data which is basically collections of objects that are intended to be processed by software or it must be observed by humans to represent facts and observations and software which is instead the code that we either compile or interpret to execute a process over the data and then we have this orp orp stays for other research products Basically any kind of research project that doesn't fall in the first three categories which can be easily recognized and identified across different disciplines while orp orps tend to be very specific to the different disciplines and this is where we ask our scientists to let's say classify their objects For each product but in fact for each object in the graph we track the original source from which we collected the metadata and we can link it to projects, funding, organizations and funder when the information exists within the original metadata As you know if you're part of this domain this is the case and it's becoming the case when links between publications and research data are provided but it's not necessarily the case because we know the other scenarios for example the links to the projects are not often available the links to the organizations are generally not provided and links between publications and software data and software are not generally available So this is why we manipulate this metadata in several ways On the one side we clean and validate we validate the original sources to check if there is respect to the guidelines On the other side we clean it to compensate these lack of compliance to our guidelines so harmonize our content where these exist We perform the duplication which means that if we find records describing the same digital object but coming from different sources we identify these two records and we blend them to get keeping track of course of both the original sources or more than two we have products whose metadata can be collected from tens of sources and we also perform inferences so we are when possible collecting the original file when possible means when the URL is correctly provided or we can infer it and the file we collect the PDF so we have around 12 million PDFs today on top of which we run mining algorithms to detect missing links most of the time missing links between these objects especially projects products or product software etc On top of this graph we build and we offer a number of applications these applications should be interpreted by looking at the graph so different views in some cases we want to use the graph to monitor how open science is being performed in one community or another community or with respect to a funder for example point of view or with respect to an organization in other cases instead we want to offer discovery mechanisms to scientists of a specific context for example so to view this graph from the perspective of their own science so the projects related with the science the products related with the science the links that are concerned and related with these products and so on so basically the system is divided in five parts bottom left you see the aggregation the whole aggregation system through which we collect the metadata records and the files when these are available these metadata records are clenched here and then they are used to generate what we call a native graph so basically these records are unwrapped and a native graph is built out of them we are collecting today 500 millions records roughly and around 1 million links directed links so if you can see by lateral by directional it's about 480 millions so we build a graph out of that and as you can see at the top we can slice the graph so we take it from the different entities point of view so we can take for example the publications or the data sets or the organizations and we perform the duplication as the feedback of this action and we then merge the equivalent objects and build a deduced graph and this deduced graph can be finally enriched with the results of mining which are bottom right the results of mining take a copy of the deduced graph populate the full text cache where we run the algorithms and as a result of this we obtain a number of updates to the graph which we store into action sets allow us to structure the way the inferred information is produced so we have an action set for links between publications and links an action set for the abstracts that we have found etc and so we enrace the graph accordingly once we finalize the graph so we build the enrace version then we publish it and we publish it via different backends these backends range from linked open data to a full text index to dumps to OEIPMH endpoint the index is then of course serving our applications which are connect, explore monitor etc and can be used by others to build their own applications and services so all this is performed using several kinds of open source technologies we we use Spark Hadoop to produce this graph and manipulate it but I mean standard technologies have been used like MongoDB to store the metadata and especially DINET DINET is a framework that is not mentioned here that we have built internally to manage workflows so all the workflows you've seen 80% performed automatically by the system then of course you need humans to verify that at the end everything went fine for example the fine monitoring all the indexing procedure was completed properly it has to be double checked by a human resources we run all this into we have beta and production organized like system and in production we have a public system what we call a public system which is the place where we store double numbers here the place where we store and provide the portals the mining system where of course as it self-explanatory claims where we run our algorithms mining algorithms and the data provision is where we keep the graph and we build it so we enrich it we duplicate it and so on I'm sorry about the double numbers here you will have the slides these were just to highlight and increase it's the slides that highlighted and increase in the last year of the resources and somehow screwed so we have around 40 people working by different locations on this system and on different aspects of it ranging from the UIs to the mining algorithms the cluster and the organization of the mining algorithms themselves which is separate from it so how to for example execute mining algorithms and plug in my mining algorithms in our system to the operation and data creation aspects etc so you can imagine how complex it is so the open air resource graph the way we built it I mentioned it before so we collect through what we call provide it's a it's a system that allows us to validate register the sources, collect the content, provide statistics about them and so on we enrich a graph thanks to end user feedback so end users can come through our portal and portals and add links to the graphs to make it better for example so they can link products to projects, product to communities etc we do the duplication and the mining as mentioned before and in the end we publish via the applications the open air resource graph is therefore at the center so we want to provide this open metadata collection, we want it to be open that's key, very important in some cases it can also be CC0 in some cases it cannot because we collect from sources that are not CC0 like Microsoft academic graphs for example we want you to be complete as possible meaning that we want all trusted data sources to be in trusted by the community of course so sources that they consider reliable for them, for their science we want it to be the duplicated we want it to be transparent which means we want to track down where each piece of information comes from so if we mine for example a subject and we infer a subject out of a full text we want to know that this subject was inferred wasn't collected from a repository and we want also to know the level of trust of every single piece of information so we identified an internal framework that classifies trust of information from 0 to 1 and we require all our algorithms to produce a level of intended trust and we assign it to every bit so you can actually view the graph from different trust perspectives so you can see for example all objects and interlinked objects with a given level of trust or below or beyond etc we want you to be decentralized and that's the idea that this graph is today surviving in open air but we want this information we want the information enriching the data sources out there to be stored in the data sources out there so we provide tools for that to happen we call it the broker service so through the broker service the data source provides us content and can actually collect back all the content that we have found that enriches the original records and they can subscribe and be notified of different kinds of enrichments this is actually very important for us because open air we hope it will exist for ages and provide this service but if at some point we want this precious information that we found thanks to this participatory effort to be stored forever that's very important ok this is just a glimpse of some of the 10,000 sources that we are collecting from but consider we from Github, software heritage to all the registries like greed, referee data, open door orchid to the thematic repositories the catch all repositories like Zenodo be to share dryad fig share and so on to the research infrastructures which are top right in this screen ok so the harvesting and transformation workflows the idea is that we have services that are organized into workflows workflows are made of sub workflows that's the framework that we built and we split it in collection phases, transformation phases so for us it's actually very important to track down every single step in this process so track down when this was performed so when we have collected when it was done, if it failed which are the records that were collected and the same on the transformation side we want to know which are the clean record how many of those failed to clean and so on so for us it's very important to track down this process key also for example to define the transformation mappings so we need to have the native sources under control to check if all the vocabularies they're used which are highly heterogeneous find and map them into our common model through the transformation for example so here there are several things that we are doing we are moving from the XML to the JSON framework that's an unfortunate heritage that we have because XML was the core language into the OEI-PMH and that's where we stood for a long time so we are moving from XSLT to JSON and XML to JSON at the same time we need to monitor the data and quality expectations across the sources within sources so for us again it's important to track provenance and to do something nice with it for example identifying statistics verify that for example overtime a data source is increasingly improving in quality or is increasing in the number of records because if at some point we realize that there's half of the records there some errors may have a chord and that's a problem for us which are building an aggregation so we need to keep things under control we do a fine-grained classification of the resource products so when we collect from a repository or a data source in general we don't consider it to be a container of objects of the same class like old publications, old data sets, old software we consider them hybrid so we do these classifications into our common model with a fine-grained methodology so we check the original resource type and we find every time a mapping into one of the meta classes we have in OpenAir publication data software and other resource products and a possible subclass if it exists so important for us is that we are collecting from 10,000 sources but some of them we pre-aggregate them especially the largest one so we have two pre-processed sources which we restrongly rely on one is Skoll Explorer and the other one is DOI Boost Skoll Explorer is a collection of article-data set links that we collect from data site Crossref and EmboleBI this means that we are collecting basically everything that is a trusted link between dataset and articles out there we are collecting today overall 480 million links by direction as I mentioned before we do the same with respect to Crossref Crossref is a key source and we want to have its richest version so we build what is called DOI Boost it's basically an intersection between Crossref, Embole, Microsoft Academics and Orkid as a result of this we have 85 million publication records complete of all possible orchid IDs all possible open access versions all possible links to affiliations abstracts and subjects and so on both collections are published as dumps in Zenodo so you can download them you can find them there for us it's actually important to build tools to generate and maintain these dumps over time out of the graph or out of our aggregation system this is something we are working on and again maybe a valuable set of ideas for you so versions should be kept and maintained over time should be produced as much as possible incrementally and so on mining we use ACFS and Spark we have around 13 million full text 12 to 13 millions depending on your collections that will be included and we use Java a Python framework here so you are very welcome to write this kind of algorithms taken into account you will access in parallel full text related with the article and you'll be able to apply algorithms on top of that according to these two programming languages here you have a list of ideas that you can take inspiration from so every time you will find one of those grey boxes basically you may have a few hints and then of course try to build on top of it your own concept important important to know is that we apply context propagation in the graph so we exploit the links to propagate information from objects to objects so for example for you if you take a look at the top if I know that a product was funded by a project and I know that the product was supplemented by another product for example the publications to a data set then I can easily propagate the link to the project to the second product this means that when I will do my research impact from the project point of view I will visualize a product I wasn't aware of which is the research data in this case for example and this will give me extra content of course I would like the data source that contains this second product to include the link to the project and that's as I mentioned before another important aspect in our mission so these are examples of propagation like country and community can be propagated across different products for the duplications we have two articles you can find the references here and there are several things several actions that we may take like improving results by adding context which context that can be inferred from the web for example so any ideas in this direction are welcome so today you go to our explore.openair.eu you will find the current production system which includes only the open access subset of the graph that I mentioned if instead go to the beta. explore.openair.eu you will find a full graph which will be open soon for open consultation these are the numbers inside so any feedback will be welcome how to access services so we have developed develop.openair.eu from there you will be able to download the data or query the graph according to different protocols we are in the process of publishing the whole dump of the beta graph so in the next month they should be available these are quite standard ways of accessing services so you should be should we find it easy please refer to us DOIboost is what I mentioned before you can find it in the Zenodo online and the same for skull explorer these slides are here for your benefit the graph will be opened for consultation in November and be released at the end of December probably beginning of July so you will find Trello as a tool to provide us feedback with we will open it probably next week this week next week the problem of identifying errors and inconsistencies in the graph is actually key so if you have in mind strategies to do that in an automated way because with Trello of course we are collecting feedback from users but one of our ideas would also be the one of analyzing the graph and automatically identifying issues for example and then provide users with prompting the users with questions like is this really an issue or not so every strategy or technique that you have in mind that can be easily used in this context are more than welcome now Natalia mentioned already our standalone services and I go quickly through this skull explorer is certainly one of those we are collecting links using a standard that is called skullics that we have devised together with other partners in worldwide including data site and severe and so on skullics is basically a simple data model and exchange format that allows to express links between publications and data sets data sets and so on so today we are collecting a huge amount of links from the sources that you see below plus others like data centers that are not included in data site but are compliant to skullics for example and we're offering to a number of consumers via APIs the APIs are open our main consumer scope is in fact and of course also the web user interface but that's really less useful is more for checking that something exists in there we go up to an average of 14Mhz per month so it's pretty big Zenodo was mentioned but it's actually a catchall repository so you can store any kind of product in there but the cool thing about Zenodo is its APIs so its APIs are open so as long as you have a token you have a user you can make sure that your service is bridged to Zenodo and published products on demand so they take a DUI, you can provide them into data and so on but there are clever applications that do actions such as publishing on behalf of the scientist can be built thanks to Zenodo so it's very important for you to know Argos while skipped on that you can find information on the internet but anyways the machine action of bold data management planning is powered by an open source an open source software called OpenDMP that we developed and the concept is that of machine actionable data management so if you want to have more information you can contact me here Amnesia is a service for the anonymization of data sensitive data which we are using in several contexts you can download it and use it on your site now let's go to this high level view we have the open air resource graph and as I mentioned before we provide what we call dashboards on top so monitor and connect and then explore monitor is really about using the graph to monitor research impact trends for example open science trends or funding trends, institutional trends and so on connect is instead more about sharing so here is where scientific community finds the tool to discover and access all scientific outcome in a specific discipline and domain so here what is very welcome are tools on the side of monitor tools to better perform monitoring operations or to use the graph for example to recommend something to the research administrators for example project coordinators and so on on the side of connect it's actually very important to erase the graph for example to improve the quality and the precision and recall of searches or device tools for example to search in a way that is let's say intent driven or discipline specific and so on so semantic search concepts and so on provide is the first of this dashboard is the one that we use to register services allow their validation and send notifications to the original sources like for example we found an enrichment for your data and so on one of the most important service we provide is the broker here and as I mentioned before is the simple idea that since we are collecting metadata from sources and we put them in a graph in the context of the graph we can interlink these original records or clean them or enrich them thanks to our tooling and therefore it's pretty easy for us since we keep prominence of every single record to track down what's new with respect to the record and who provided it so these new bits can be sent back to the original sources so original sources can subscribe to the open air broker and say please give me all the new open access URLs you find about my records or give me the orchid IDs of the users that I have or give me the DOI of my records if you find one and so on the user statistic service instead is if you're familiar with these kind of aspects is the implementation of a service that aggregates user statistics about the individual objects, publications in this case across repositories so repositories participating to this framework and scheme are capable of tracking down events regarding for example the download or the view of a record of a given publication and send this information, these events to this original aggregator of events the user statistic service that can aggregate this information and provide a unified view so you can actually see how many time an object has been accessed across different objects across different sources in one source or the sum of all of those so these these numbers are typically used to as indicators of quality of given articles or for example the different sources so how much they've been used compared to others let's go to again to the broker so topics topics are produced for specific data sources so whenever OpenAir produces a topic it's about a target repository about a specific object or a target repository the topic is of course assigned it gives a message for example I haven't reached with an abstract this record and includes a level of trust so the original source can actually subscribe to a kind of topic and say give me all topics that have a given level of trust for example and whose message respect certain criteria so this is kind of configurations that we can provide we have three kinds of events enrichments, additions and alerts we are only producing enrichments today enrichments are again as I mentioned before ways to complete the original records with information that wasn't present in the beginning additions are not yet produced but of course ways of doing it are welcome so we want to tell a data source when we have found a record that should be in the data source but is not present today so there are ways of doing this deducing it from authors if you can identify a sort of strong relationship between an author and a repository like it's repository of reference if you can infer it from the graph itself or from a statement that you can find somewhere online for example from the affiliations etc alerts are more of the kind this record has a mistake and there are several ways of producing them we have some on our roadmap for example through the OEIPMH data collection if we find an XML error we can actually point the original repository to that as a notification with a notification or if a user comes and tells us that a given link is wrong then we can of course or a given field is wrong we can of course alert the original source this is on the roadmap we haven't yet produced it so this is just a page that exemplifies how an original record that we collected from CLO in this case no sorry from La Referencia which is the south is the Latin America aggregator is enriched on the side of via through several pieces of information ranging from different ways from this can be downloaded from the funding the subjects related research results and so on these are just examples metrics we use sushi as a way as a standard open source software in fact to collect information we had to change a few of the aspects there so more information can be found on the open air website and you can ask us directly but anyway these are the key elements and you can find information again on the website on how to hook a data source to our user statistic framework so here are the links ok finally just a few words on what we have built as connect sorry I'm a bit out of time but it's going to take another four minutes out of the graph we can view the graph basically through the eye of a given community with scientific knowledge so we built this service that is called research community dashboard through which on demand we can produce what we call a community gateway the community gateway looks like the applications that you see top left is basically a view over the graph and this view can be configured fine tuned by the community manager which is an authorized user so the girl there can configure the criteria for the gateway of the different objects of the graph and we have several community gateways that have been generated today others may be generated of course in the future the idea is that you can specify the subjects of pertinence for example of objects so objects with a given subject can belong to the gateway the provenance so if the object comes from a source or if the object comes from a given community is another like collections often defined by scientists and communities the projects that are relative to a community so all objects related with these projects will be included in the gateway and we also propagate the notion of link to a community via the relationships as I mentioned before and here are two examples so this is again to highlight the fact that you can enhance the graph or suggest ways to make this criteria better or let's say adaptable much more better adaptable to the communities your criteria can be via orchids or others again monitor instead is a way to look at the graph from the perspective that I mentioned here so from the funding impact point of view ability to attract funds forms of open science impact which can range from fairness fairness of software, fairness of data fairness of whatever you want to be there so any suggestions in this direction are very welcome like new measures, new indicators that can be calculated or new ways to enrich the monitoring tools that we have to better capture the quality, the trend the ability to stick to open access mandates for example in the context of open air here are just examples as I mentioned before and you can find more and more suggestions here finally well this is the discovery portal as you can see as I mentioned before this is the production but you can find the beta service as well with the extra content that I just mentioned and that will be open for consultation so thank you happy to reply to your questions now and in the next days so if you want to send me an email if you want to have more information on any of the services that I presented you're welcome as you can see there are so many so it's really hard to have an overview in 40 minutes ok thank you very much Paolo for these detailed presentations there are already some questions from the participants so I can transfer them to you the first one have you got registries for all kinds of objects product, funder etc yes we include well of course we include the registries that we believe are interesting for us in this case ORKID for sure grid.ac for organizations so we have what else the registries of the data sources for us are very important open door and with the data because we don't want to build yet another one unless it's very very necessary because this is key we have an idea of building a new registry for data sources if the current registries for example won't be able to stand to our requirements yes in general these are the registries that we are considering today ORKID of course ok thank you second one how do you support consistency of the data in registries are we relying on registries so they should be in charge of consistencies when we collect from different registries and this is the case in several cases we deduplicate so we build we build internal let's say bridges between the different registries this is of course an issue so in some cases we are taking specific actions it's an issue because every time we run a deduplication process we introduce a level of doubt on what we are doing and this should be itself curated so it's a sort of extra registry on top so we can't afford that for everything of course we are in the process today to develop one for organizations because we really need to have our organization information stable and stabilized in the context of open air if we want to provide for example statistics about them so once we produce once we deduplicate this information which we collect from what they see but we collect it from every funder has its own identifier for the different organizations in some cases there is no identifier at all like in open door and briefly data they have organizations but they don't provide specific ideas so whenever we find a result of the deduplication that is useful to us we notify it internally and we have curators that make sure that this is really the case and if this is the case this is stabilized so it means that for us it becomes authoritative so the way these different entities are linked together and this creates a more stable environment so this is under implementation under implementation now will be released hopefully beginning next year what about the registry of organizations they are asking that's what I said okay we consider this and from Emily is there more information on the trust level we we make sure that every time we collect information or we produce information we assign a level of trust so this is available in the records so if you download our records every records will have inside this information when is needed so how we assign it depends on the quality of the original data source if it's a user providing it if it's an algorithm providing it and so on so I'm not sure what you mean by more information but that's what we have so if you go to the for example to the website and you find you open any of the products if this product has a link to another one that was in third you will find on the right that's a bar saying how trust for this information is like 89%, 90% etc okay so you can also find the visualization of the trust okay thank you very much I would like to ask the participants if they have other questions and also the technical experts if they have additional comments on the presentations okay I guess that this is a no can you see my screen the agenda is on it yes okay thank you so maybe I will proceed with some points related to the open air advance open call for tenders and after the end of this a small presentation if there are other questions maybe we can provide the participants with the related the respective answers okay so regarding the framework of the updated open air advance open call for tenders this is still split it into three phases phase one is about solution design phase two is about prototyping and phase three is about the original development and testing of a limited set of first products and we decided to keep these phased approach because allow successful contractors to improve their offers for the next phase based on lessons learned and feedback from the procurer in the previous phases and using a phased approach with gradually growing contract sizes per phase also makes it easier for smaller companies to participate in the open call and enables SMEs to grow their business step by step with its phase so we believe that is better to keep this scheme second point the maximum budget pretender will be 60k and only one topic can be chosen that means that among the three ones that were presented each participant will have to choose the one that it suits better to their activities this time there is a threshold of up to 15 points with the highest score of this one of 30 points that means that it's applicant with a score less than 15 meaning 14, 13, 12 etc. is going to be rejected there is also a flat rate for each phase 10% for phase 1 40% for phase 2 English is the language of the tender both for the communication among the procurer and the participants and the mentors also all communication and submissions must be in English deliverables and milestones Of course as I said before the open call is expected to be published mid-November on the official website of the project there you will find during the next days as well the webinar the open market consultation that we delivered today and the presentations of our technical experts and of course after the publication of the open call you will have some time to address your questions at theopenair.org if you need clarifications or if you have any other remarks we will happy to provide you with answers because the open call is expected to be online for 30 days you will have time to send your questions and we will provide you with clarifications So these are the points from my site I would like to ask you one more if there are other questions or you need something either from me or the presenters there is one question can multiple independent proposals be sent by the same company Well this is an issue that we have already experienced and is a contractor from non-easy country eligible for the tender by saying easy country you mean European Union I believe So regarding the second question we accept proposals from EU member countries and also from associated countries according to the horizon 2020 list of associated countries I'm sorry and regarding the first question this is an issue we are still trying to decide so I believe that you will have our official answer upon the publication of the open call ok thank you very much for your participation if there is any other comment then I will proceed to the end of the meeting there is a possibility to have joint proposals time by saying a bound to team up with open air partners I believe that you're referring to the conflict of interest maybe this is the issue so in order to answer to your question we still don't want a conflict of interest that means that you you are able to submit joint proposals however we think we still think that we don't want participants that have already received funding from previous open air calls however we have to say to you that the official rules are still under let's say finalization so upon the publication of the official call you will see that which is the final decision of the open air advance team however we are proceeding to this path at this moment ok thank you thank you very much you can still address your questions at openair at coralia.org and thank you again for your participation today thank you


Snestrunk. Oh, I forgot I should probably talk. Welcome back to Snestrunk continues to play XLA.  That guy's an easy mini boss thing to get rid of and I- you blow it! All right, we're coming up on a part where it is- ooh Yeah, that's a really cool part of this level is the dragons like burst out of the ground Now this part right here. Let's pick a side either pick the left side or the right side and only worry about- ah shit Only try and worry about what is happening on that side Don't scroll back and forth trying to shoot everything or you will get killed. I think I'm past that part now Nope coming up on more. Oh No, okay. I know where I am now. Now we're gonna get the firewaves to avoid those you go away. Oh No, I'm wrong. It's this boring part here.  I really hope I don't die soon. I want to at least get to the boss Got these things popping up here. Pick a side. Stay on that side Don't try and shoot everything. Don't get overwhelmed with all the shit on the screen Just stay on the either the far left or the far right If you scroll around trying to dodge everything you're gonna the best way to dodge everything is to stay on one side Preferably the left side And now we got these waves the best way to avoid these is to go all the way to the top left And go immediately go all the way back down.  Although it's you'll see in a minute the super nintendo hardware is Choking itself to death trying to display this thing It's almost gonna die.   What was I thinking see that green spot there?   There we go Oh like that. There we go.  At least it was only a weapon thing Gotta have my pops Damn it's the second time I got hit by this thing. I got this pea shooter with useless bombs Oh boy, this is gonna be a bad time Uh, I'm better off for it Better off dying there. You don't want to be stuck with that weapon Yeah, this is by far the most powerful weapon so far That we can we can use see how quickly the dragons dissipate there The music picks right right back up too. It was kind of calm and soothing and that's uh The underwater level there now it's it's picked way back up It's being back on the level of the same mindset as the first two levels Again, I think 30 000 points should be an extra life or I'm sorry a free guy Then we got these guys look out Whoa, that was really close There we go. Excellent That will help immensely against this boss I don't think the boss really has very many projectiles other than the lava he throws He tosses up at you those little Circular things. All right, now we back off and wait for these things to jump up and we Shoot in the mall The boss's main attack is to just crush you with his hands All right, sorry to do this to you cartridge. Actually, I'm playing this on the retron five. I always thought it was interesting that the uh, I don't know the technical explanation behind this, but uh Even on fancier supposedly fancier hardware even on like the emulation Like this is the same as playing through the super nintendo hardware Kind of interesting Again, I'm not sure I'm not I'm not I don't know enough about the technical side of super nintendo Yeah, so you got to watch his hands. He's giving you big jazz hands there. Here come the Just get out of the way Pick your spots. Don't stay in one spot and just hammer on the His heart there. That's a bad idea because you will get hit Like how he has his hands like don't Don't come on Stop it I'm gonna tell I'm telling We're doing good here. I think we got the whole thing exposed now. It's just a matter.   Hey, wait a minute Wait a minute, isn't that the same music from the beginning of the game? Hey, aren't these ships the same ships from the intro? Why you might think that and yes, they are That's what makes this game really cool It does all this without any words any dialogue throughout the game itself. Yeah, it has the words in the intro, but uh I always thought that was a really cool touch It really works well All right, this is oh another free guy. Wow. I've got five lives right now.   He's gonna crash into his own ship.  I've never seen that before God damn he nearly bashed into his own ship Even though you could do that Anyway, yeah, this this new weapon here is by far the strongest in the game and it's it It's got that annoying sound But it's still pretty sad. It's that high-pitched. I think only my dog can hear that It's kind of annoying, but it's really powerful. So it works works well There you go Anyway, like I was saying at the end of the secret amana The last secret amana episode I did this is going to be my last playthrough for a while Just because I want to vote, you know, I have a lot less free time now Things are picking up at my job and uh, I moved and I moved to a new house now.  How did my gun get changed? Oh, well, this'll work But yeah, I'm gonna take a break from let's blaze And I'm gonna focus on reviews for the most part at least that's the idea I think that's what I do best. This is a let's play thing. It was just kind of an experiment to see You know, if I was any good at it see if it would be fun. It's good enough, but you know, I like doing reviews better I like understanding really like sitting down and thinking and playing a game trying to understand What I like about it and what I don't like about it and why Again this guy is moving backwards to get a whoa that was close to get away from me When it's like oh wow, okay, I forgot about these Is he gonna follow me through this little thing?  Oh, this is gonna cut him off though. Okay Never mind I thought I thought that thing was supposed to stop there.   Ah, this music is creepy Whoa, that was out of nowhere Oh boy, this part is really tough. Sorry. I'm not talking much. This is pretty intense free guy.  Oh that I got lucky there those up. We're getting close to the final boss Still got a ways to go but you know, we got this mini boss here really cool effect here where it's uh If this is what I think it is The guns in the bottom those are important because those things.  I'm down to three guys Damn it I wasn't paying attention see now.  Oh god instant death right here.  I'm out of Out of weapons just two guys left Can I bomb these?  Oh, you can hit the projectiles. Cool. All right. I got passed Did I make it am I there?  Well, you know what? I'm not going to make you sit. This is the last episode. So I'm going to come back later Uh and transport our way magically to the final boss And we're back. Yes, we're back and that was very close. Okay so I don't know why I decided to uh Very very careful here There we go. I don't know why I decided to resume at this particular point, but uh, here we are Stay away from those missiles. They are instant death.  They're just killing me All right, I think I should be coming up against that mini boss Yes, there he is Sure, let's show this again. Why not whatever I just Felt like grab a grab the mic and start talking again Especially now that I go into this battle with this weapon.  Damn it Had to jinx it Take out one of these things at least there we go. We got the guns up top Ah, son of a bitch Out of the way of that thing drop some bombs on this thing Remember to dodge laser remember to get ahead of that thing while dodging the laser And I managed to take out that thing that's very rare to take out both Of those things at least it's rare for me Now will it fire again? Yes, it will It'll fire every time within a certain timeframe each time you cross the Thing and a free guy. All right. That's big time See if I can drop some bombs on this thing now. I don't think that gets rid of it Maybe it does. I don't know. I don't care. It doesn't matter now And we cross this There we go should have the big Laser beam things coming up here. Oh, no these things first. I completely forgot. Oh, and here comes death. Yes, just as I suspected Here comes death these things again Be very careful Those things don't matter. They're completely out of the way You just have to back up and allow for these things to get destroyed now We have these things these should be the last enemies before we get to the final boss The first incarnation of the final boss. There's several. I didn't even get past the first one the last time So We don't even get a music change at first. We just get attacked by fried chicken.  Oh, look out it's fried chicken It's delicious and it will get you. Okay. Now we have a music change. So here we go Very I'm not gonna say much Stirring commentary here.  Yep. That's that one.   This one's not so bad He's have to really concentrate. What am I doing?   Okay Ugh, what is this thing around me? I don't even know what this is. Is this mine? Did I generate that or is that like a thing I'm trapped in? strange Yeah, these things do not respond to it like they take several hits to get to destroy it.  I'm on my last guy This is better.  Come on. Don't do this. All right. I got him.  All right, there we go I accidentally jostled the thing loose All right with this part all you have to do is outlast it just keep firing keep hitting him It's this is more about endurance than it is about doing damage I think you have to last a minute And if this I think on the harder difficulties the flames in the back get closer to you Ah, I'm almost there about 30 seconds to go This is it. Come on Gotta be close.  Oh, that was close.  Come on. There we go. All right. Oh Jesus Christ. Is that stressful?  No, there he is. He didn't die Good for you Oh Good for you. You survived the final boss fight on easy. Good for you. Okay Yeah, here's the dramatic Music Sounds like when they introduced the chicago bulls in the 90s like the and now you're starting lineup Master chief has saved the day despite cracking his visor. I'm sure that'll cost a few hundred bucks to get replaced. I mean that thing is Not cheap Sure, it's customized. I'm sure it's like a some kind of prescription Fixes vision. I don't know. I'm just bullshitting And I'm Almost positive you get more if you beat the game on normal or on hard, but Instead we just get that little blurb and we go straight to the Credits Thank you. Estimate for your work on this game. So yeah, anyway, this is it for me for let's plays So I'm gonna take a break. I may come back. I may not come back. I honestly don't know But what's gonna be happening is more reviews. I'm just gonna try and Concentrate on reviews. I want to get earthbound done. I want to get soul blazer done I want to get seconded setsuit or say. I'm sorry say kinden setsu three done There's all sorts of games.  I only get dsl out here. I've tried it. I annoyed people on my twitter feed Like hey, can you check this out and people said I can't even it won't even load Like it's really slow to upload on my end. So I can't it just won't work So and it's it's like that's why I always did just 10 minute episodes for let's play This is because it takes all night to upload A 10 minute episode from recording from the retron five with the el gato video capture thingy Thank you taro for this kick-ass music And thank you mcata for the street to sd to remix whatever that means but yeah What are the reviews I got coming up? I don't even know I can't even take off the top of my head I do want to get earthbound done eventually That's a hard one, but I'm gonna have to put a lot of thought into it and all that sort of things. Thank you, mr. Katov And uh, hey, I want to really thank you Thank you for watching and have a great rest of your day. Maybe we'll challenge normal mode sometime. Thanks for watching


There are a lot of different types of modalities of couples counseling and a lot of times the couple will talk to the therapist or about the problem, talk about each other, not talk to each other, and the therapist will provide advice. The child may be fixed the symptoms, here's the strategy you could use. We're looking to actually win a model to help a couple understand the root cause. So we're helping the couple get more conscious about the conflict and do it through a very gentle structured process where the couple faces each other, the couple is doing the talking to each other, not about each other. And this helps remove a lot of the I would say the conflict and the negativity that couples come in because they're coming in and they want to face the therapist and tell the therapist about their spouse and how badly they are and how you have to fix my husband and fix my wife. And instead of buying into that we're getting the couple right away to make eye contact, to connect in a deeper way.


Item number SCP-006-FR Threat-Level Orange Object Class Euclid Special Containment Procedures SCP-006-FR is to be contained within SCP-006-01-FR under the supervision of Site-LF. Three D-Class personnel must remain inside of SCP-006-01-FR at all times and ensure that the metal shutter located at the entrance of SCP-006-01-FR stays open. Six armed guards must be present at all times outside of SCP-006-01-FR. All personnel who wish to interact with SCP-006-FR or enter SCP-006-01-FR must be vegetarian. In the description, SCP-006-FR appears to be a typical male human butcher of Eurasian descent with a height of 1.87 m and a weight of 112 kg. The subject only speaks Russian.  Many 8% of the time it has on a bell would hold many miscellaneous kitchen utensils such as knives and choppers. SCP-006-FR is not normally aggressive, but it has the physical strength and resistance equal to 5 times that of a normal human of the same weight and height. In addition, it can also instantly teleport to SCP-006-01-FR as well as teleport any butchered utensil present inside SCP-006-01-FR into his possession. SCP-006-01-FR is a common oblong-shaped butcher's shop with dimensions of 5 m x 10 m x 2.75 m. There are two rooms on the inside of SCP-006-01-FR. The first room, which is located directly after the entrance, is 5 m in length and 7 m in width, and includes a normal counter expected of a butcher's shop, as well as the entrance to the second room, located behind the counter. The second room is a freezer which is 5 m x 3 m. After teleporting, SCP-006-01-FR will appear in either of the two rooms. The choices of locations to which it teleport seems random, but it has been noted each locale's population of similar density. SCP-006-FR can only teleport if the metal shutter on the entrance of SCP-006-01-FR is closed. The greatest recorded distance for an SCP-006-01-FR teleportation is ████ kilometers. The first reported occurrence of SCP-006-01-FR was in the 1940s, but it was not contained until 1996 when it localized before SCP-006-FR could teleport it. A recovery unit was dispatched and successfully destroyed all buildings around SCP-006-01-FR or towing the exceptionally heavy building back to Site-11. SCP-006-FR only appears outside SCP-006-01-FR if he's attacked inside SCP-006-01-FR. If this occurs, then it will proceed to follow the aggressors until they are either dead or outside of the 150-meter radius around SCP-006-01-FR. When the entity finishes hunting, or it can no longer hunt the aggressor, it will warp itself into the freezer of SCP-006-01-FR. If SCP-006-FR is wounded heavily enough by the aggressors, then it will stop hunting immediately and teleport itself into the freezer where he will stay for one day. This seems to be a recovery mechanism, as it allows SCP-006-FR to heal all wounds which it may have sustained. SCP-006-FR is unable to perform any other activity while it is recovering, even a potential non-vegetarian customer will not cause it to move from the freezer. Normally, the entity will stay in the freezer and keep its door closed. If a vegetarian enters into SCP-006-01-FR, then the entity will stay passive and nothing will happen. When a non-vegetarian human enters SCP-006-01-FR, however, it will enter an active phase where it will get out of the reserve and treat the subject in SCP-006-01-FR as a customer. The subject will always ask SCP-006-FR to give him his favorite piece of meat. The entity will then enter the freezer and come back with a package. The package will contain the subject's favorite piece of meat, but while he is in the reserve, SCP-006-FR will somehow take meat of a similar cut from the subject. Like this, the subject will stay alive and attempt to go home with the package, even if the piece SCP-006-FR took would usually cause a fatal or immobilizing wound. One instance includes a D-class personnel who started crawling back to its cell after it ordered a pig pee. After reaching its destination, the subject will start to consume the uncooked package meat and then immediately expire upon finishing it. The research team led by Dr. Grimm is studying if SCP-006-FR uses specific waves to control the subject or if this faculty is purely psychic. Electroencephalograms made on subjects while they are under the influence of SCP-006-FR showed that the part of the brain responsible for decision-making was heavily damaged, sometimes to the point where it resembled a lobotomy. The first theory is difficult to demonstrate as applying an electroencephalogram onto the entity would be probably impossible, but the idea has not been discarded. All attempts to force open the freezer's door or damage it using vegetarian personnel have failed. All attempts to enter the reserve using vegetarian personnel while SCP-006-FR within an active state have not only failed but have also enraged SCP-006-FR further. In-depth research has found documents from the Battle of Stalingrad which show the dead body of a person who looks similar to that of SCP-006-FR and reports from the Russian High Command. See Addenda 01-006 On ██████ an experiment with the purpose of observing the reserve of SCP-006-01-FR began. A non-vegetarian D-Class engaged SCP-006-FR while two other vegetarian D-Class sought to gain entry into the reserve. SCP-006-FR became enraged when the two vegetarian D-Class attempted to enter the reserve as he left. SCP-006-FR then warped his chopper into his right hand and ██████ causing the death of all D-Class personnel inside the shop. A containment breach was avoided due to the intervention of on-site armed guards who lured SCP-006-FR outside of the shop by provoking it with armed fire and engaging its hunt phase. The guards successfully harmed SCP-006-FR enough to force it into a recovery state and had worked back to the reserve. Containment was then re-established and SCP-006-FR was secured again. SCP-006-FR no longer exhibited signs of anger after recovery when the Foundation sought to determine the method of SCP-006-FR's removal of body parts from the recent casualties. There were a total of fifteen casualties from this experiment, three D-Class personnel and twelve armed guards. Further attempts to force or otherwise enter into the reserve of SCP-006-01-FR have been forbidden from now by the Director of Site-ALEF. Interview A-01-006-FR Interviewer Dr. Grim Interviewed, SCP-006-FR began log. Forward, the following recording is an interview between SCP-006-FR and Dr. Grim through a vegetarian D-Class equipped with a communication system, while SCP-006-FR was in an activated state. It has been translated from its original Russian. Hello, 006, let me introduce myself. My name is Dr. Grim. Are you able to answer some questions? Yes. I would like to talk to you a bit about your activities. My activities? What do you do once people enter your store? I have to admit that I often wonder why you act in that manner. There is no answer from SCP-006-FR for a few seconds, but it is apparent that the question has upset him. Nothing extraordinary, I'm just doing my job. What is your job? To make them aware. Aware of what? What they do to themselves. I help humanity be aware of the entity pauses. Now, the entity points to a non-vegetarian D-Class who made him enter his active state. Please excuse me, I have a customer. End log. SCP-006-FR acted per its usual after the interview was terminated. Addenda 01-006-FR This is an article extracted from the popular Russian newspaper Dupravda, dated ██ 1942, as found by Dr. Caroline.  Members of the PCUS discovered a grip of mangled soldier corpses in an altar to a heathen god in the reserve of ██ a well-known Stalin-grab butcher yesterday as they were following a lead on suspicious missing persons from the Glorious Red Army. The news has spread quickly thanks to the glorious Russian people, and as a result, the traitor has been executed in the reserve of his own butcher shop. Commissar ██ Makarov, who was involved with the case and was asked his thoughts, later commented. This was a young man who was lost after the death of his parents. The enemy took advantage of this and used him against the mother Russia. Those altars dedicated to false divinities, similar to ones we have found in ██ butcher shop, are used for worship in Thule society, which Hitler is a member of himself. I cannot help but feel disgust at the cowardice of those fascist dogs. The butcher shop was later burned with ██ body still inside. This document is from the personal diary of Commissar ██ Makarov, who was, at this time, the assistant of ██ messing, a polished medium in the service of the Red Army's paranormal team. It wasn't the Thule society who created this thing, nor was it Hitler's doing. It was us. Messing said he saw in his dreams a way to create the ultimate soldier, nearly immortal, who could bend space itself and be totally devoted to his cause, to his job, to his work. For it to work, though, we needed a subject to die in a very specific way. And we needed to be sure the work we gave him will be of the utmost importance to him because, according to messing, this would be the only priority of what we will create. He had seen the rituals, how to build the altar, and now we only needed to find the right subject. We needed someone lonely and desperate enough to accept going through the crazy ritual. Ianfield's coming from the Mother Russia. We searched for people who had just lost their entire family from Operation Barbarossa, and after a lot of rejections we found ██ the perfect one. His parents and he had lived in one of the first cities to fall after Hitler started his attack. His parents owned a local butcher shop, and when meat became rare and missing, cannibalism started to appear. And those butchers were the apostles of this. All of them died. The young ██ was the only one who survived and was able to successfully reach Stalingrad, where he did what his parents did, own a butcher shop. Once the famine showed up again, however, he did again what his parents did, cannibalism. It was this time we went to him and made a deal. We would forget his strange dinners, and would give him revenge for Wehrmach if he joined us. He agreed.  We showed him how their thirst for consummation led them to invade us, and how their invasion led the Mother Party to famine, without ever telling him a word about his necessary death for the process.   At the moment the body of ██ touched the ground, the reserve started to move, like an earthquake. Space began to bend and then ██ we failed to contain him and, as we really didn't want him to reach the outside, we set the shop on fire. The next day, the shop had just disappeared. There were no ashes, ruins, or even an empty space between the two shops where it had been located. It was as if it had never even existed.  We disappointed him. The Mother Russia disappointed him. Hitler disappointed him. Humanity disappointed him. Before he ████ I heard him say something about consummation society and everything it meant about humanity. We created a monster, the perfect weapon. He was supposed to have been turned into a killing machine pulled between duty and pure hate. But then I hoped that, although he failed his experiment, messing was right. I hope his last work, the one about to make humanity aware of what it was doing to itself would never leave its butcher shop. Because if it does, may God forgive us all. Commissar ██ Makarov killed himself just days after writing this. Messing went missing after the Battle of Stalingrad. The few researcher assistants who have been working on this project were likely killed in the events following the death of ████, taking note of these facts, uncovering the research which made lead to the rituals and subsequent creation of SCP-006-FR impossible. Object regarding ████████ messing is ongoing.