Hey everyone Shaber1000 here today we got another package I don't know what's in this or at least I don't think I know but we're gonna find out and see so stick around let's open this up and check it out okay so let's open this up well you guys already know what it is because of the title but at this time right now I don't know what it is so I'm gonna open this up it is from Ohio which wish you guys know that's my home state see what this is oh it is it's an air filter this is an air filter okay I know I know what this is smoke air filter we're gonna open this up and check it out so stick around guys and and I'll get get you a better angle here I can't get my camera straight for some reason so stick around okay guys so as always I like to research these things before I review them so I can give you the best to my ability of the product and the features and things like that small size convenient to hold premium quality with unique design eliminates odor and smoke reduce second hand reduce second hand smoke with extra filter mesh so you get to tow total of two filter meshes okay so I'm we're gonna open this up and and also if you have a problem with this if there's something missing or if it's broke contact Amazon you'll get it you can return it for free so let's go ahead and open this up pretty exciting you know what it reminds me of also you know the packaging is very nice this reminds me of that smokeless ash tray from the gremlins this is the peltzer smokeless so let's open this up nice packaging this is your extra filter so you get two of them also like to mention that one and there's also foam down here in the bottom to hold it in place these are reusable or not reusable they are replaceable filters and you get one inside it and an extra one and that's up to 1,000 uses so with the extra one you get 2,000 uses a lot of the other brands it's kind of a one-time thing when it's done you throw it out you buy a new one this you can buy extra filters for it for my firearm enthusiast what's that remind you of right right that's what I thought too it is lightweight it is this is a silicone this is how you change your filter you just unscrew that it feels very well made I mean I don't know if this is a gimmick I don't know how to change that filter oh just pop it out okay just pop it out and there's around it's kind of rounded on this edge and flat on this edge so you just put it in there and you're ready to go again and I'll tell you some more things about this soft silicone material design right here and move us out your way so the lights not silicone design two filters and a breathable mesh says you never smell bad air in your place after coming home from a day at work again two replaceable center cartridges the mouth area is big and you don't need to blow hard for it to work shape of the design fit for your mouth shape and size right here we're going to test this out remove the screen when dirty or wet so you can clean the screen you can screen you can clean that then pack dry place back inside mouthpiece so again it's it's 1,000 uses for this filter and you get two filters so that's that's really good so it's 2,000 uses it can filter out unpleasant odors it comes with replaceable filter inside ready for use product dimension is it's 8 ounces 1.97 by 1.97 by 3.15 inches date first available April 19th is when these came out you know they have some people question some things here and they answer you know can I use it in closed environment sure the filter collects the most of smoking odors when you smoke in a car or bedroom and another one is what you know what is the difference between this air filter with with the similar products like the smoke trap this filter can be changed with a new filter you know so you might that you don't have to throw the whole thing away so that's good here it is again let's move on to let's try it out now I'm a smoker so I wouldn't be able to tell you if the if the odors not as bad but because you know I don't smoke in the house either smoke outside or in a garage or underneath this fan here the range hood the exhaust fan but I do smoke in the car but I make sure I have the window down because monkey don't smoke so well I I just roll the window down and you know the smoke will just get sucked out my window but maybe this will help too so I will definitely be using this in real life scenarios in the vehicle probably not in the house but yeah inside a vehicle I will be using this even with the windows down so this this is gonna be a this is gonna be nice for me so let's go ahead and I'm gonna grab a cigarette and a lighter and let's try this out fun fact guys I have about 18 lighters it's no kidding over in the the our selling stuff the stuff that we sell but it's and it's in a tote down on the bottom of our camp and stuff I do have lighters in my backpack but I do not want to get those out I want to keep them in there so my lighter just ran out so I'm gonna be using this thing okay so let's go ahead and disclaimer smoking can cause cancer it's not good for you don't do as I do okay all right so let's see let's take a puff of this I don't know if you can tell how much smoke is coming out but now let's use the filter it's a little bit there I mean other than what's coming off of here I don't know if you guys can see that there's a guy as a YouTube channel and it's always does he reviews cigarettes he just smokes that's what his channel is all about smoking he gets some horrible comments but you know I look at it this way those comments are people that judge I'm sure you know 90% I'm just eating Big Max all day long or whatever we all do stuff that's not good for us we all have bad habits so let's not judge each other you know probably a drunk guy in his mom's basement you know would be how you shouldn't smoke well you know first of all you shouldn't judge other people second of all you know put the whiskey bottle down that's bad for your liver I don't know if you can see that you can see that now let's do that again with the filter I see some but it's like 90% different now those were a couple big drags I was like hotbox in a cigarette so this is this is yeah cuz like I said since she doesn't smoke I will use this in the car even with the windows down and if I smoke underneath this this event this range hood I'll use this because sometimes I do smoke under this range hood and I mean you know that really sucks a smoke out you can actually hold a cigarette right above it and it'll suck it down and out up out so she's never said I couldn't smoke in here but she's not a smoker so I respect that and I just don't smoke in the house unless I'm you know or I'll stand at the door or something but yeah or under this hood range here so there is guys nice and I got to get a nice triangle okay folks there it is I think it's pronounced dieback you can see that so I like the shape of it does feel nice it's light it is going to help it seems we're blowing through something like this but I mean you know if it helps it helps I mean like I said you can't do anything about this you know unless you hold it over it does kind of help but so yeah every little bit helps when it comes to smoking a lot of people drink too much coffee caffeine you know I've got a double whammy I drink a lot of caffeine but I don't I don't drink I don't drink a lot of tea I do have tea sometimes I don't drink coffee at all but I do smoke cigarettes and I do love my Coca Cola so yeah that's there we go so yeah let's um let's recap some of this okay I'll recap some of this for you more than a thousand uses per filter you get two filters small size easy to carry it's portable the screen inside of here you can take it out and wash the screen off in between uses and it's free to return this if you have any problems get a hold of Amazon they'll take care of it for you if it's broken if it's missing anything you don't like it they'll return it for free pretty pretty neat little device I've seen other filters and not in person some other brands of filters it's just a one filter deal you use it you throw it away this you can buy replacement filters for there you go so that's pretty much it it is light I like it I mentioned they come in pink for you ladies shea bear met the man legend gone for now thanks for watching link for this product will be in the description box below thanks for watching guys enjoy the rest of your weekend we'll see in the next one bye bye and take care


Hello and let's talk about Nirmala Sitaraman's economic stimulus package. The Finance Minister announced the fifth and final tranche of the supposedly Rs.20 lakh crore package on Sunday. All the details are finally out and the economists and experts are not happy. Prime Minister Modi promised a package that would be equivalent to 10% of India's GDP. Most calculations put the actual spending by the central government between 1 and 2% of the GDP. The rest is in the form of credits, injection of liquidity by RBI and similar measures. While governments across the world are spending to actually put money in people's hands, our government seems to see this as an opportunity to cut costs and privatize. Meanwhile, the government is going all out on a PR campaign to convince people that it's helping them. Senior journalist Paranjay Guha Thakurtha spoke to Professor R. Ramakumar of the Tata Institute of Social Sciences on this issue. Here is what they had to say. What, according to you, Professor Ramakumar, is the big message that the government is trying to convey through this fifth media conference and by saying that the government is spending the equivalent of 10% of India's GDP that it gets for the poor, that it gets for the migrant worker and it's doing its level best to revive the working of the economy. Let's have your initial comments before I ask you specific questions. Thank you Paranjay. First, two comments are this. It is very clear that the government does not want to open up its purse. It doesn't want to spend as yet. That's point number one. It largely has been using monetary policy and the deposit base of the banks is a substitute for fiscal policy that I think is the one major takeaway from these announcements. The second biggest takeaway from these announcements is that they see this crisis as an opportunity. They see this as an opportunity to bring in a number of reform measures which have over a period of time been extremely contentious, not just vis-a-vis states but also different groups like Labour, for example. These two are my big takeaways from this announcement. Let me just say this. Across the world, if you see, governments have opened up their purses to deal with the crisis. They are not necessarily spending in revival packages of the Kenyan kind that we have seen in the past. What they are largely doing is to try to hold on. What I mean by trying to hold on is that until the pandemic is over, until the spread of infections is contained in some form, let us keep jobs safe, let us keep people healthy and nourished, let us keep people in a better state. Now that is the focus of the 10% of the GDP measures that you have seen across the world. About $7.5 trillion is being announced as fiscal packages across the world. Out of these $7.5 trillion packages, you will see that about $4-4.5 trillion are largely fiscal measures, direct spending by the government. What are these direct spending by the government? They pay the companies, small-scale industries and so on. They pay them with the condition that they will keep the workers in their payroll. They will pay them 50-80% of their wages so that their jobs are not lost. They are given a large number of grants, subsidies, exemptions, etc. in this period in order to allow them to hold on till the crisis blows over. So about only about $3-3.5 trillion out of the $7.5 trillion is monetary policy measures, what is called as below-the-line measures. Now this is the global situation, but we, out of this 20 lakh crore that we have announced as part of this Atman-Nibbar package, I seriously do not see a spending of more than 2 or maximum 3 lakh crore. The rest about 17-18 lakh crore I largely see as being pushed through banks using their deposit base or asking institutions like NABAR to borrow from the market and spend in some kind of funds and so on. That is the nature of this 20 lakh crore package that I see. I do not see more than 2 or 3 lakh crore being spent from the budget of the government. One sentence worth, even this spending of 2 or 3 lakh crore that we are talking about from the budget of the government is not necessarily fresh expenditure. A lot of this 2 to 3 lakh crore is actually expenditure that is already committed in the budget or it will come by cutting some head of account and then saving money from that head of account and spending in this package. So it's not necessarily fresh budget expenditure, it's going to be some kind of re-appropriation that we are going to see. Professor Ramakumar, I was in fact doing a bit of back of the envelope number crunching with my friend A.K. Bhattacharya of Business Standard and in fact our numbers are lower than yours. If we look at schemes which have a direct impact on the FISC, then we actually come to a figure that one is very, very charitable towards the government, a little over 1% of our GDP. That means you have the 40,000 crores on Manrega, you have 8,000 crores which is the viability gap spending for various social infrastructure projects, for the agriculture sector roughly 6,000 crores, for migrant labourers and farmers another 16,000 crores, for the micro small and medium enterprises package, we see barely about 40,000 crores and even if we are very charitable and the Pratamunthi Kalyan, the Yojna which was announced even before these five schemes, out of the 1.7 lakh additional expenditure, even if we take that about 70 or 80,000, the number comes to just a little over 1% of our GDP. And we see that the bulk of the money that is being accounted for and added to the number to arrive at this 20 lakh crores is really as you rightly pointed out, the biggest chunk is what the central bank, the Reserve Bank of India, 8 lakh crores will really be in the form of various form kinds of refinancing. We find public sector organizations like the Power Finance Corporation, the Rural Electrification Corporation where the distribution companies, the electricity distribution companies there, the bailout package of 90,000 crores, the food corporation of India, about 40,000 crores and of course the state governments. In other words, the central government will be spending barely an additional 1% more of GDP but telling India and telling everybody else and telling the country that we are going to be spending 10% of GDP. That's a wrong argument Paranjai, I agree with you. I do not, what I said as 2 to 3 lakh crores, I was being liberal because of how we count what is fiscal can differ across different estimates. But what in my view, direct fiscal, if you count it in that sense, it will not be more than 1.5 lakh crores, that's in my view, out of this 3 lakh crores. What I see as the rest is largely for example, the 45,000 crores expenditure that you mentioned as part of the FCI expenditures is largely a monetization of food grain stock that you already have with you. So it need not be counted at all as part of a fiscal package. So if you remove all that out, I would agree with you that we would be somewhere near 1 to 1.5 lakh crores, exact estimates are yet to be done but when I looked at the different slides that Nirmala Sitaraman presented today, I do not see direct budgetary expenditures exceeding 1.5 lakh crores. But direct and indirect fiscal measures may add up to about 2 to 3 lakh crores somewhere in between depending on how you measure them. That's what I would say. I agree with you that a Himalayan proportion of this 20 lakh crores is largely not money from the government. It's hard earned money of the depositors which will be sort of mobilized to create different funds, a fund for NABAR. NABAR for example has to raise 1 lakh crore for a package. Now that 1 lakh crore will largely come from market borrowings of NABAR. That's not something that will get reflected in the fiscal deficit of the government. That's another way of borrowing through NABAR and not showing it in the fiscal deficit. So a lot of bookkeeping adjustments are happening of this sort and I do not see that the biggest problem with this kind of bookkeeping tricks is that you end up giving very little directly to people. In our next segment, we talk to news clicks Praveer Purkhasta on the global response to COVID-19. Now there has been a lot of politics around the disease. The US attempts to skateboard China being the most prominent. Equally significant is the role of big corporates as they try to generate profit at this time of crisis. Praveer talks about the perspective of the global North on public health and what role this has played in the response. Praveer, thank you so much for joining us. So what we see is that there is definitely a clear divide in terms of responses to COVID-19 between the developed countries and the developing countries and the global North and the global South so to speak. But one of the key interesting aspects is that in the global North, the idea of how to respond to a pandemic itself, there has been a lot of confusion. It's like in some senses, they've almost, it is public health in that sense, it's kind of disappeared from a lot of the perspectives of these countries. So could we start a bit by talking a bit about this? Yeah, you see, if we look at the issue of what I call the problem of infectious diseases in the West, it's really that it disappeared from public view, as you said. And what took over is infectious diseases are really the problems of the poor, people who have not developed countries, dirty, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. It was essentially a colonial view of the world that infectious diseases are no longer the problem of the West or that and the colonial countries. But it is something which only bothers those who are colonized, the poor countries and who live in all kinds of filth. Now, if I take the racist part of it out, which of course it was, the underlying issue is that in advanced countries, they have actually been able to control infectious diseases, even before we have the quote unquote riddle of the modern medicines in the shape of antibiotics, the sulfur drugs and all of that, which really did, of course, have a huge effect on the infectious diseases. So before that itself, if you see the plague, for instance, which, as you know, probably killed about 20 to 30% population in Europe, those infections were a real cause for concern. And you have this plague picture, which was basically of London and how it really decimated the people over there. Now, I'm not going to talk about how much it affected different sections of the people, because we have now figures of different kinds to show it, of course, affected as it is doing now. Also the poor much more than it did the well off, but it also did affect the rich then too, as it is affecting now, even if it is less than the, you know, what's affecting the poor. So this really spread over Eurasia. This is what's known as the second plague where the first one happened in about 600 odd AD, what's called the Justinian plague. So, but if you leave that out, there is also a third plague, which people seem to have forgotten. And that also took place in Eurasia. If you see, it really took place in countries like India, in countries like Southeast Asia, in, of course, China, and the total was something like 10, about 12 to 15 million people, 10 million died in India alone. Our memories are quite live to this picture of the plague. And when we had the Surat plague, if you remember, in India, there was an instant and immediate reaction, which that is a part of our historical memory. But this did not happen in Europe. In fact, Europe saw only about 1700 plague deaths in the third plague. So therefore, they thought that this is not their problem. And of course, we are not going to talk about the impact of all of this in terms of inequality. It's also interesting, once you have the plagues in Europe, it, in fact, you had a labor shortage economy and the distribution of wealth actually improved, not because of the plague, but because of the consequence of the plague, the short, much less population. Now, people have tried to bring it about the influenza epidemic, also the loss of the wealthy losing part of their wealth, being a less divided, less unequal society. But I think they forget it was really the socialist revolution of 1918, 1917, which coincided with the influenza epidemic. So you see continuous reference to influenza epidemic being the last known epidemic. And what happens is we have a whole set of diseases which get forgotten. As I said here, the third plague was not considered a major one by the West. They considered it that the last pandemic, therefore, not the third plague, which continue up to about 1950, that they considered it only the last pandemic only being the Spanish flu, which of course, as we know now, did not come from Spain, but came from Kansas, probably.  Peter Hotez has written a book on this, Forgotten People, Forgotten Diseases. And the question is, if you take the population today, about 65 percent of the global population, if you also include in this forgotten diseases, TV, malaria and dengue, if we include that 65 percent of the global population really suffers from the so-called forgotten diseases or what I would call is the diseases which are forgotten by the pharma companies and the advanced countries, the quote unquote advanced countries of the West. So here is the issue. These are forgotten diseases, but not by the people who are suffering from them, but really by those who do not see the effects of it on them. And that's where we come to the chart that I quite often show that here you have what the Forbes magazine, Forbes publication quotes as the best prepared countries. Of course, it's not their preparation. It's really a global health security index prepared by John Hopkins and Johns Hopkins and I think nuclear, some nuclear body, which looks at all of these kind of issues, nuclear threat index. I think that's what came from and now they can also join with John Hopkins for a global health security index. Then you will see these figures are a couple of days old. You will see that those countries which are supposed to be the ones which are best prepared have fallen really victim to COVID-19 is a big way. I'm not going to make this a theoretical point that that is why because they did not look at infectious diseases, therefore they have suffered the most. The reality is, of course, they're also the most well connected countries and therefore start surprising that it has spread to them so fast. The real issue is that how unprepared they have been for the re-emergence of an infectious disease and the fact that people in the United States, for instance, the first thing they did with the lockdown was imminent for stock up on guns and ammunition. So that is their collective memory that they don't remember the infectious diseases and they don't know as a society how to respond to it. And of course, the fact that CDC has been gutted under Trump, the fact that we have a person heading CDC who essentially represents the American right, all of that meant that CDC, which probably has a much bigger budget than the WHO, was completely unprepared for the epidemic, could not even prepare a test kit, which a number of countries did, even after a month, after they had put out the kit and it had failed, they still could not develop from producing a kit which was working. So from the time they launched the kit, which was somewhere in February, they took one more month because the testing could start in the United States. And as you know now, that one month is what made all the difference. So I think this is the first issue that we really need to look at, that essentially what we have is the fact that there is no collective memory. The public health system have been gutted in the West. They have been handed over to private capital. There is what is called just in time manufacturing principles applied to the health system, by which you don't keep the beds empty. You plan for the influenza peak that comes in the flu seasons, and once that peak is met, during the peak, you should just pick cut to cut. That means you should really not have any surplus capacity. Then of course, the fact that private health care has taken over in a big way. So what they're discovering is private health care as well as the pharma companies basically want ill health because that's what gives them money. Public health is completely opposite to that. And that's something that seems to have forgotten. That's all we have in this episode of Let's Talk. We'll be back tomorrow with the latest news developments of the day. Until then, keep watching News Click.


Many of the sites which we so often cover are not only attributed to what we believe is in reality a far more recent, well-studied, yet less controversial ancestor, one placed within permitted timelines. Indeed, many of these sites would have been incredible relics so far back within history, periods of development and difficulties. Many ancient sites so well-built, thus resistant to weathering, that what we claim as merely re-inhabited locations often become the cradle of more recent academically permitted civilizational flourishment. It would also make sense, on a strategic level, to have claimed such miraculous technological advancements that these past constructions still displayed as their own handiwork, adopting or rather hijacking said sites, making academia's job an easy one, for not only are these sites attributed to civilizations who would have been developing said technologies in their mere infancy, but these adopters of past high technology themselves claim to be the creators of said sites, this regardless of the incredible perfection present and the mastery of said sites on display. No matter how unlikely this level of efficient execution would have been, no matter how preposterous to assume they suddenly arose, alas, this is exactly what one is expected to believe. The royal mausoleum of Mauritania, for example, located on the road between Churchill and Algiers in Tempaza province, Algeria, is an impressive ancient structure which we have discovered is actually hiding some tell-tale characteristics indicative of lost technology and thus lost civilization. And as that of a funerary tomb, like so many other sites we cover, dismissed of its controversial features and academically concluded as the burial site of the Berber King Juba II and Queen Cleopatra Selene II, both past sovereigns of Numidia and Mauritania, allegedly buried at the site. However, predictably, no human remains have ever been found at the site, and this is claimed to be due to tomb raiding. As mentioned here, there are particular features of the site, not only hidden in plain sight, but we pause it, we're probably noticed and deliberately ignored during mainstream explorations – false doors indicative of a lost civilization. Furthermore, note the size of the stones in which these and other frescoes have been carved into, standing tens of feet high, several feet in length, and over a foot thick. The stones were far beyond the weight of what those who are academically claimed as the builders were capable of lifting. Clearly showing signs of an incredibly long life, with several of the build's old stone layers now all but eroded to dust, not only was the structure built to last, but we feel has in all possibility outlived a past now lost civilization. Who really built the royal mausoleum of Mauritania? How did they lift and play such gigantic stones? Why have these features seemingly been overlooked? Questions which desperately need answers. It is a site which we find highly compelling.


I'm going to show you guys a minimally inflammatory meal. So regardless of what stage of life you're in, especially if you have health issues, this is an excellent, excellent base of foods to start with. Key word, a starting point. So this isn't nutritionally complete. It doesn't have the best vitamin to mineral ratios. That being said, you can use this and then add supplements, whether it be an actual physical bottle supplement or a food like salmon roe or caviar to get some omega three. Start with this, see how you tolerate it for a week, two weeks, three weeks, and then take it from there. Let me explain why I made certain food choices today. Our protein source is veal. And the reason I chose veal over beef is because it's lower in iron. I noticed I have better gut motility and overall I sleep a lot better when eating veal as opposed to beef. Just the color of the meat, it's much lighter. It's kind of pinkish gray as opposed to deep red that indicates the physical iron content of the meat. You might try to go for chicken or pork or something else, but those animals are fed poor quality feeds. I tend to react to the things in those. So from a minimal pollution perspective, a minimal inflammation perspective, lean, high quality beef is the best choice for most people. If you can get the veal that has a slight edge over it because the iron in the meat isn't going to promote pathogenic gut bacteria, promote high amounts of liver damage when you eat a lot of it. For the carbohydrate, we have two things. One is going to be regular white russet potatoes, organic to remove some of the chemical concerns. And I also have some organic apples I bought just because if you just eat potatoes and meat every meal, you're going to eventually crave a little something. That's what the apples are for. We have some salt to season the meat. And one very important thing about reducing inflammation is the cooking method. So we want to cook both the veal and the potatoes as minimally as possible without really charring them at all. Because when you get that mired reaction, when you really heat the food, it does make it harder to digest. So we're going to take some coconut aminos and poach the meat in that, cook it really nice and gently pretty fast. And for the potatoes, we're going to dice them up and saute them in coconut oil just until they're tender.   So we're going to peel the potatoes, dice them up, get them in the pan with some coconut oil to get them started as they take longer than the meat. And we're going to dice up the meat, put them in the pan, same thing. Home meal should be ready in about 15 minutes of cooking time, mainly for the potatoes. From a health perspective, if you can peel something, it tends to be the better idea. It's actually funny that some people think there's nutrition in the peels of the skin. I think that was some type of nonsense agenda to get people to consume more chemicals. Kind of cut these reasonably small, otherwise it's going to take forever to cook. So in our pan on high heat goes two tablespoons of coconut oil. And this is the main fat component of the meal. Coconut oil is antimicrobial and it's also giving us that caloric energy so we don't crave it too much. Take some filtered water, maybe half a cup, salt in the water to distribute it. And then put our potatoes. This is pretty good because if you crowd the pan too much, it's going to take even longer to cook. So that's ready. So this is the veal top round we have on Frankie's Syrians meat. What I normally do is I cut this into like six or seven steak portions and then I'll put that in parchment paper back in the fridge. So you can see both sides here. Top round is very classically used in roast beef. I think we actually did a roast beef recipe, but beef is actually like way bigger. It's like this big. And as you can see, this is shaped like a steak. So you can just go, you have seven or eight steaks and you can cook them like steaks. That's what I normally do. But if I want something minimally inflammatory that also cooks pretty quickly, I dice this up a couple strips of veal and we'll just dice it up. Now in this pot, I'll put a couple tablespoons of coconut aminos just for some flavor. And you can marinate these in the aminos. This doesn't really add that much flavor to them because they're only cooking them briefly, but a salt and here goes the veal. Our water is boiling for our potatoes. Keep that covered to speed up the cooking. You could add a little bit of coconut oil in here. I usually do. It's not necessary. And then as this heats up, you know, the meat's going to lightly poach, turn gray, and then we'll just take it out. So all this stuff is cooking. I'm just going to peel two of my apples. Veal is bubbling a bit. It's about halfway cooked. I'll turn the heat off. So the potatoes are sticking a bit and the water's evaporated. Just add some more water here. Cover this back up. The veal is done. It only takes about two or three minutes on a high heat. I'll just kind of spoon it out into the plate. So after about 15 minutes, the potatoes are nice and tender. A little bit of sticking on the bottom, but that's normal with a steel pan. The thing with potatoes is if you overcook them, they cause stomach issues. If you undercook them, they cause stomach issues. There is a pretty large margin of error with the happy medium, but you'll kind of observe that if you make the mistake in either direction. So here is our minimally inflammatory meal. And believe it or not, it does taste pretty good. You know, it's seasoned with salt. We cooked it correctly. You can add more salt. You can add coconut oil to add more fat if you'd like to. From a nutrition perspective, we have B vitamins, protein, the animal mineral profile. And here we have carbohydrate energy, feed our gut bacteria, the plant mineral profile. And the reason I chose potatoes for this meal today, as opposed to white rice, barley, wheat, pasta, other grains, other starches, is because of the mineral profile of potatoes. And it does contrast pretty nicely with any meat you choose. So I have some veal. I'm taking really small bites, making sure to chew the food completely. Mainly the veal because a lot of the time when you cook carbohydrates this much, they don't need to be chewed that much. Another thing to keep in mind that ties in with the really chewing the food is don't drink too much water. Don't dilute your stomach acid. Don't dilute your stomach juices. You know, I was having that barley soup the other day. You might actually want to even take some digestive enzymes if the liquid in the meal is higher. So you take your time to chew that food. You relax. You're also able to gauge your appetite, gauge your satiation and not overeat. So I ate about half the veal, half the potatoes. I'll save this for tomorrow. So I'll have to cook again. Now in my experience, apples are one of the best fruits. Pineapples are pretty good too. Pears are okay. Green grapes are okay. I have some raisins actually too. Those are things I've found to be fairly okay on the stomach. I mean, I have some cookies in the oven right now, so I don't always completely adhere to this minimal inflammatory thing, but I try to. Whatever organic apple is on sale. Of course, we have a fairly high water fruit, a little bit of B vitamins, sugar, the fructose, the glucose. But more importantly, it's a high volume. So it's great for gut motility, really gets things going, fills up your stomach. The sucrose helps a little bit with that too. You want something a little sweeter if the apples are kind of acidic. Then just, you know, drizz a little bit of honey on it. You could do some macadamia nut butter, which some people do have a problem with, so that's not the best choice. But, you know, if I liked coconut more, I'd probably do some type of coconut mana. Although I was carnivore for almost eight years, this is actually the diet that I typically had people follow even when I was carnivore. You know, my first question to them was, you know, are you looking to do carnivore, or are you looking to keep plant foods in your diet? You know, I mean, as that main reason I was carnivore was because I didn't know how to orient my diet so I could tolerate plant foods. I mean, if you guys aren't having too much success with your diet, definitely try this out because I've tried just about everything myself, and this is what I landed on. So thank you guys for joining me today. If you could please leave a comment down below, drop a like on the video, make sure you have that notification bell selected, and I will see you guys for tomorrow's video. If you do want to support me further, you can check out frank-tifano.com for diet consultations as well as my many other businesses. You can get the veal top round on Frankie's Furage Meat. I think we still have some left. My cookies are ready.


Real-time centimeter is a sentiment analysis tool developed by the Claris Research Group and Corvus MSL Group. That records moment-to-moment audience reactions to live or pre-recorded presentations. Centimeter is the next generation of audience measurement, providing flexibility, adaptability and detailed metrics that you can't get through traditional dial testing. Participants in a centimeter session use their own web-enabled device to control the centimeter tool. Respondents simply enter a session specific URL into their cell phone, tablet or personal computer. The experience of using their own device is much more intuitive to respondents than any other propriety testing technology. After respondents enter the URL, they are then prompted to log in and answer a few initial questions. Answers to these screening questions can be used to segment the results by target group. For example, the responses of men and women can be analyzed independently. The centimeter tool will then load. Respondents give constant moment-to- moment ratings of the featured presentation. Moving the bar up or down using the finger or mouse indicates that respondents either like or don't like what they're currently seeing or hearing. A customizable scale allows centimeter to determine the intensity of audience reactions. Sessions can be conducted in person, remotely over video conference services, among small groups or with hundreds of participants. After each session, clients receive a written analysis and a video report. The video report allows for a full review of audience reactions, including moment-to-moment sentiment of target demographic groups. The written report highlights larger trends and pinpoints major events that solicited changes in audience perceptions, both good and bad. Centimeter has a multitude of applications, including message development, ad testing, audience engagement and media training. Centimeter can also be used iteratively. For example, if you or a client want to develop a speech for an upcoming presentation, speech versions can be tested using centimeter to guide future revisions. The result is a thoroughly vetted presentation that you and your client know will resonate with the target audience. If you are interested in advanced message development or learning how people react to your content, centimeter can help. For more information on centimeter and how you can use it, please contact Clarice Research or Corvus MSL Group.