Okay, very good morning. It is Thursday, the 7th of October. I hope you are doing well and quite a few things for me to get you up to speed on, from Vladimir Putin coming to the rescue of the energy crisis, following yesterday's comments, natural gas futures globally, all coming under significant pressure pulling back from the multi-year hires that we had been seeing, of course. Joe Biden virtually is going to be meeting the Chinese President Xi Jinping by the end of the year and the markets liking that as well, as the fact that there were some ECB sources coming out as well from Bloomberg last night, talking about the fact that the European Central Bank is thinking about a new bond buying plan or program, which I'm going to talk about a little bit more detail in the moment. So, lots of different things going on. I haven't even mentioned the fact that we've made progress as well on the US debt ceiling. So, some positive forces in play and as such, then we've had a general kind of more optimistic open here in mainland Europe and the UK. But before I begin, don't forget to check out AmplifyMe.com. If you just go to AmplifyMe.com slash Market-Maker, I'll drop the link in the video comments below, but you can subscribe to my daily newsletter that I put out, just plucking out one single theme of the day and giving a bit of an explanation behind what it means and why and how and so on. So, good way to accumulate and build out your kind of macro fundamental knowledge. So, feel free to sign up to that. It's absolutely free, of course. Otherwise, let's get straight to it and talk about the charts and what's going on this morning. So, as you can see, equity index futures are in positive territory. The Nasdaq's up about 128. The DAX is up a good 200 this morning. Energy prices continuing to fade at some of that move following the gas commentary out of Vladimir Putin yesterday on the weekly chart. Absolutely perfection on the technicals to that previous level that we were looking at. So, a good point as well, technical resistance to books and profit on the resurgent price that we've had over the course of the last week or so. So, quite optimal then to close out those long positions over the short term given the commentary that we had yesterday and movement in that gas futures. Dollar index has just broken down through yesterday's low. So, a little bit of weakness there on extension of that technical break and as such, Euro dollar then just managing to get its head above the range in the top left chart here from yesterday's session. And again, through the pivot that has just helped propel the price a little higher this morning with trading up about 14 pips. Now, pivot and that previous range high just acting as a bit of near term support. Likewise, cable trading up around a similar margin, but more dollar led both pairs up an equal amount at the moment. Gold then subsequently a touch higher. Again, similarly breaking up a little bit out of its recent range up five bucks. Very much influenced by the US dollar and T-notes trading unchanged this morning. And as mentioned, oil down continuing that downward trend seen from yesterday down a dollar and a half at the moment. But fairly sizable intro they move for oil, but in context comes as I said, big ramp up in prices that we've had. So, let's get straight into it and talk about some of the major news flow. Some really interesting stuff actually going on. And don't forget you can access my early morning call on my Twitter handle for those interested. But let's talk about US-China relations first because it's been a bit of a hot and cold relationship between Biden and Xi so far. But what came about overnight was that Biden plans to virtually meet Xi before the end of the year, according to US senior official. This comes as well amid the US trade representative Katherine Tai. You remember she was talked about a lot at the weekend because she was going to come out and she did on Monday and criticised China about the lack of adherence to phase one of the agreed trade deal. And she is set to meet her counterparty, the vice premier today, or as soon as this week I should say, to discuss those matters. So definitely there's been a bit of a kind of olive branch put out to kind of, I guess, pacify any more confrontation ahead of those trade talks, which obviously are material importance to both nations. So that's the latest there. Then we've got the debt ceiling. You might have seen me tweet about this last night, but Democrats have signalled they would take up the Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell's offer to raise the debt ceiling into December. I think it's December the 3rd that they're penciling in. And so that way, alleviating any immediate risk of a default looming on the horizon, which is about 11 days away from now, as what Janet Yellen has been saying, the 18th of October. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said early today that, so their talks were going well into the night, that the two sides were making good progress and they hoped to have worked out agreement by the morning. So when the U.S. starts to come back in in a few hours time, definitely be looking out for confirmation of some of this more positive headway that they've made. A couple of things to be aware of here then. So the Republican plan, what is it? They want to increase the limit of federal borrowing by a fixed dollar amount that would be sufficient to tide the Treasury over basically till December, when Congress would then have to vote again in order to avoid a default. The vote could come at the same time Democrats want to attempt once again to pass that massive tax and spending package, which has been one of the main complications of course of trying to bundle them all up into one package. So for me, this is very reminiscent of all the other debt ceiling talk that we've had. This is why the markets have been relatively sanguine about the whole situation. We certainly on the desk feel the same. The debt ceiling gets a lot of air play in the media, but really carries very little consequence because it's just used as leverage for politicians and ultimately dealmaking happens. And what they're doing here is essentially kicking the can down the road. Absolutely normal practice. We've seen this many times before. It's just going to be the same conversation is going to come back by the end of November. And it'll be the whole thing. The U.S. going to default again. Janet Yellen will start making some noises about how risky that is to the economic recovery. The politicians will play a game of brinksmanship right to the end and then they'll probably extend it again. It's quite likely given the fact that the most tricky thing here and I actually think of everyone, the Republicans might come out in terms of the political upper hand on the right side of this because they're the ones who've tabled a solution to an impending problem as far as the public is concerned. And now it's going to be the Dems then when they again try to club everything together with this huge spending package at the end of the year, which is again going to cause delay and complications. So I think it's quite a good strategic move by the Republicans at this point in time. So we'll see how that plays out. But again, it kind of nips that in the bud. We look at confirmation, of course, from later on today when they will come into Capitol Hill. But as we were expecting, not really too much of a big deal for the debt ceiling. The other thing that came out late last night that I thought was really interesting. You might not actually recognize this lady, but her name is Jennifer Granholm. And she is the US Energy Secretary. And she came out in an FT exclusive, which was last night. And she was talking about the prospect of releasing crude oil from the government's strategic petroleum reserve. So otherwise known as the SPR. She declared all tools are on the table as the Biden administration confronts a politically perilous year. As the surge of price of gasoline obviously would significantly weigh on US consumers. And so this, of course, adding complications because we're coming into the midterms next year. And hence the reason why that you're likely to get a lot of kind of torque and pressure coming by way of the US and all of those OPEC names again to try and counteract some of the resurgent price and energy that we've had of late. The Energy Secretary also said they did not rule out the ban on crude oil exports. So that was actually something that the US legislation changed several years ago to be able to export crude. But if they put a ban on that, then that would kind of replenish if you like the amount of supply in the market and try to tame some of the resurgent prices being experienced specifically in the US. To give you context, the special or the strategic petroleum reserve I should say is managed by the US Department of Energy and further numbers the reserve contained about 617.8 million barrels of oil last week. And that's I guess how much is that in terms of what it equates to in demand. It'd be enough to effectively be able to match US petroleum product demand for about a month worth. The last big release that we did see would be back in the Obama era. We'd have to go back to basically 10 years in 2011, the last time it happened. So at the moment, do I expect this to happen? I don't think so. Usually when there's types of things and they tap the SPR, it's more to do with say a natural weather system, a hurricane that's caused massive destabilization that squeezed the price high and they need to control that. I think it would be too political to be doing it now, given that it would obviously be aimed at taming the price to appease then consumers going into a major political event. I think that would be quite harming for Biden. So is the talk enough? Again, a part of this, of course, is to kind of address just general market concerns. If the market buys into the idea that they could step into the market, does that kind of tame some of the outright speculators who are just super bullish going into the price at the minute? Perhaps. But let's see, the price obviously has come back quite a bit today because you know who? Your main man, Vladdy's come in and dropped the bomb and basically said, you know what, we can sort this out. No problem. We'll just start through the state-owned gas problem, pumping more gas. No problem. Got you covered. Problem is, is that I would fully expect Putin to use energy supplies to gain leverage over Russia's neighbors and also, most importantly, advance Moscow's strategic priorities. So obviously, the market has been very sensitive to inflation of late. And rightly so, this energy price squeeze has meant that it's much more than just a transitory issue. And hence the reason why yields have been moving. Subsequently, it starts to impact just general sentiment, particularly tech stocks and so on and so forth. Now, one of the points here is that while Putin's comments certainly come timely and as relief for politicians and central bankers in the western developed world, these things definitely come with a cost. And I think Putin here has played an absolute blinder. And the reason for that is that he certainly has strategic interests, certainly in neighboring nations, but also because of the heavy dependence that European nations have on Russian gas supply. This is a chart just to show you. The more red the colour, the more heavy the dependency on Russian gas. And as you can see here, we include the likes of obviously Poland, most importantly, Germany, which is why Merkel historically has always been very passive to talk about Putin on the international stage. For the very reason that Germany is highly dependent on Russian gas. Austria, Hungary, Greece, Serbia. There's a lot of countries here and it does trickle all the way through, of course, even to the likes of France and the UK. So Putin has the solution. He's kind of held back on it, let the crisis burn for a little bit and then step in with the solution. But as I've said, I would definitely look at this now as Moscow looking to push their strategic priorities further. And Europe doesn't really have too much to counteract that anymore other than make, you know, make way for him to do some of his proposals going forward or at least be more open to listening to that. So, yeah, hopefully that gives a bit of context. Otherwise, the other thing I wanted to mention is the ECB hasn't been too much of a move on the back of this. You could argue that European yields are a touch low this morning. The boom's coming up to yesterday's high in the fixed income market. But the ECB is said to be studying a new bond buying program to prevent any market turmoil when their pandemic emergency purchase program. So this was kind of the way it works. In ECB, you've got the APP that kind of standardized QE. Then you've got the added pandemic emergency purchase program on top of that, which is resizable. That's the one that will end and is scheduled to end by phased out by next year. And hence the reason why now they're talking about the potential according to unidentified officials familiar with the matter of a new program. So the plan would both replace the existing crisis tool and complement that older open-ended quantitative easing scheme that's currently acquiring around 20 billion euros in debt every month at the officials. So, yeah, there's no smoke without fire. And the actual article of sources that Bloomberg put out is pretty detailed. So for me, this is definitely a very much a coordinated effort on behalf of the ECB to use the backdoor of sources to drip feed in the idea of kind of a stop gap between then to soften the impact of what it would be to start tapering in a European style, so to speak. So I don't think it's too surprising, but certainly it's a new thing to be aware of for sure. The other thing that's happening today is Olaf Scholz and his SPD party, the Social Democratic Party are starting exploratory coalition talks today with the Greens and the pro-business free Democrats today. And of course this comes after that slight victory that they had over the CDU CSU. And so we're looking at forming pretty much an unprecedented three-way coalition of a traffic light system being then red, kind of red, yellow and green is what we're looking at. Not expecting a great deal to happen anytime soon. The problem, of course, the more fractured government, the more parties within the coalition, essentially the more headache it creates because subjects such as taxes, budget, climate, housing, spending, everything has to be agreed in a uniform fashion with parties that generally have different points of view. So hence the reason why politically it's going to be incredibly challenging going forward for Germany, but at this point in time just kind of figuring out the balance of power amongst these parties is going to take time. So even though they're talking today in these exploratory coalition talks, I definitely would not be looking for any type of outcome, certainly not one that would impact markets today. The other thing is then equities have seen a nice bounce obviously from the lows and was helped a lot yesterday by a number of these positive factors that I've talked about in this briefing. US-China talks, the potential for a tap on the SPR to tame energy in the US to Putin's comments, pulling back in gas to ECB sources talking about a new bomb buying program. The latest coming out of two banks I just wanted to mention was Barclays and JP Morgan. Barclays have said that essentially inflation fears persisting and the economic cycle maturing. Barclays sees a period of high volatility and lower returns for European stock markets. However, they find equities is more attractive than bonds and as such they recommend investors should be buying the dip. And then JP Morgan, on the other hand, must definitely give the caveat that they've been a permeable on US stocks. But their strategists have basically said stocks can handle and obviously oil rallying aggressively as it has done to $80 has really prompted a lot of concerns gas prices, even more so. But JP Morgan's analysts have basically ran the model and that the output has said that basically stocks US stocks can handle $130 oil and two and a half percent yields. And looking at history, the US economy and American consumers, they say did just fine between the period of 2010 and 2015 when oil was trading on average around $100 a barrel. In fact, adjusting for things like inflation and consumer spending power, JP say that oil can actually go to $130 or even $150 a barrel without causing too much trouble economically is what they're suggesting. So again, do I buy into that? Perhaps not entirely in full agreement with that, but certainly listening to these banks and their calls is interesting to see the timings of these things and generally trying to see what the general collective consensus is at this point in time is to see whether or not we still got legs in this recent rallying oil still to come. All right, welcome to the calendar for today. Very quiet in the UK, European morning, ECB minutes coming out 12 30 weekly initial jobless claims in the US this afternoon expected to decrease to 348 and 362,000. But otherwise pretty quiet on the data slate. Quite a few ECB speakers to be aware of Chief Economist Phillip Lane speaks at 9 30 with ECB's Schnabel at two o'clock. You also have fed non voting member Mester, who sits kind of more center leaning Hawk speaking on inflation dynamics at 4 45 London time supply coming out of fairly sizeable Spain, France this morning with a three 10 30 year note refunding announcement out of the US at 4pm this afternoon. So that is it. Any questions at all, feel free to drop a comment. Be happy to help. And don't forget to check out that market maker newsletter. If you want to sign up, all you need to do is pop your email in. And also don't forget that tied in with the newsletter. We have our weekly Friday podcast with myself and head of trading. You just need to search for the market maker by and find me on Apple podcast or Spotify. You'd be able to find it. All right, guys, take care. Have a good day ahead. Thanks very much.