Good day and welcome back to the Asperger's growth YouTube channel with your host, of course, Mr. Thomas Henley. Today we're, I'm, well, I'm coming at you with a different video as you can tell with the title. We're going to be doing a Q&A. Yes, it's been a while. It's been a long time since I've done something like this, but I think it should be really, really cool to get into. There's a lot of cases where I make videos on my, on my dating and autistic, like series of videos. The thing is with that kind of stuff, it's very generalized. So although it may be applicable to, to most people and it may help neurotypical people understand autistic people. It's not very specialized and, you know, there's a lot of nuances in, in relationships in general. And so today I'm going to be looking into some of the comments that I've received on my previous videos. And if you want to have your, your comment answered or your, your story, please just put it in the comments of this video and I will get on it for the next one. So we have a lovely woman here. To my knowledge, my boyfriend is undiagnosed and I've been doing some research and info such as this seems to line up with what I've experienced. If we're together and I relax and go quiet, he asks me repeatedly if I'm okay, am I sick? What's wrong? Even if I tell him that I'm okay, he keeps on and eventually curls up on my lap. I'm not sure what that's about. I'm not sure what that's about, but it happens a lot. If he had a bad day, I never know about it until later on because he goes radio silent. He lets it ruin his whole day and it bleeds out into other areas. He says he knows he over-thinks and he says, I have to tell myself it's not the end of the world. You know, this, this comment was posted on one of my dating and autistic videos. I guess we should first, first look at the, the evidence say if your boyfriend is undiagnosed and he, he doesn't think that he's autistic. You should try and, you should try and accept that to some degree because I understand that it can be absolutely glaringly obvious to you. But the thing is, is that it's not, it's not up to you and it's not up to, to most, most people in the world to tell you if your partner is autistic or not. And I've received many messages and emails before around this question, around diagnosis. You know, a lot of people seem to, they see the traits in their partner and some of the negative traits are very, very apparent to them. They ask the autistic partner about it, they don't want to hear any about it. And even about it, there's a stigma attached to that and so they're very, you know, especially even if they're older, even if they've gone through life and it would be a late diagnosis. They've already established themselves and to make that change and to make that switch, it's a very, very, it's a very big change to be making. You know, our brain, our brains tend to develop up until the age of 25.  A lot of things are sort of inbuilt to you as routines. And when something along like this comes along goes pow, everything you thought about yourself and your experiences in life. It's a different angle on it because you're autistic. It's a very daunting thing and it's something that needs to be done very slowly. The only real, real way that you can get around it is by watching autistic people talk, watching films, watching shows, you know, you can't force it upon someone. I know this isn't the issue of the comment, but it is a very important key thing to keep in mind. It's not your choice and they're an adult. So you should kind of respect their desires as frustrating as it may be. So I digress going into the actual topic around. I think for the first thing that you mentioned about a masking, if you relax and go quiet, it may be just that he's got a lot of difficulties from the past. As an autistic person myself, I developed my cognitive empathy quite well.  But there's always a nagging thought in the back of my head from previous experiences in life that says, you know, you don't understand the situation. You know, you need to know, you need verbal confirmation about these things. You need strong verbal confirmation with all the body language and facial expression incorporated for you to feel okay with it and not freak out and think that you're not getting something that the other person is trying to communicate to you. There's a common anxiety around that, especially in relationships. You've got a lot tied into your partner. You know, there's a lot of history, there's a lot of emotions.  And if they have those experiences in the past where they didn't quite understand the situation and they said something that was out of place in that situation. If they've received a lot of negativity because of it, then it's going to stick with them. I would say that that's more of an issue of cognitive empathy than more than anything. It may just be that he's working himself up because the outward presentation that you display is different and he's not really sure how to characterize that. Anxiety tends to be very, very high in autistic people. So, you know, combining those two together, being in a relationship and having all these emotions and it likes to find me and not being able to understand how you feel about things. It lends a lot to getting very anxious about interpersonal stuff. So, the second part is, you know, if you had a bad day and you go as radio silent, it lets it ruin this whole day and it bleeds out into other areas. I think the best way to, I mean, this is related to alexophemia. You know, if you can't notice or categorize your emotions, how are you supposed to make adjustments to things and cope with changes. The best way to explain this is through some form of analogy. When we plan for our day, when we wake up, before we go to sleep at night, we have an idea of how our week's going to go, how the day's going to go. I love, you know, this is not something just for autistic people, but it tends to be a lot more structured. It tends to be a lot more time bound. It tends to be a lot more in depth than how most people would plan out their day. You know, it gives time to transition, gives time to do various special interests, to exercise, to go to work, to socialize. A lot of this stuff, we have an idea of what we're going to be doing in the day. We would just take a day in a situation. And maybe the thing is that he has a plan that he has in his mind of the day that he's going to have. He's going to go out. He's going to go to work. He's going to, after that, he's going to go to the coffee shop and have a coffee or something and then perhaps come home and do some gaming and talk to you a little bit.  The thing is with us in routines is that it can be really helpful for us. It can keep us very structured. It can keep us very productive if we want to be. But it also means that if something doesn't quite go to plan, something doesn't really turn out how we thought it would be. It has knock-on effects for the entire day. We obsess over it. We can't move on to the next segment in our calendar without completing this. All the anxiety builds up. We tend to have a lot of anxiety issues, autistic people in general. It's very high prevalence and even severe anxiety, quite high anxiety. These routines are quite central to us because they keep us grounded. They make us feel in control of what's happening in control of our day, especially if we're doing things that perhaps are around people or there's a lot of sensory issues or the stressful things that we need to do to get to the place that we need to go or to do the thing that we need to do. And if we have difficulties transitioning from one part to another or something doesn't go right, something goes wrong, we'll hyper-focus on it. It'll tie our brain in knots trying to think of ways to approach it or think of ways to fix it. I've got in many situations, especially with video and audio editing where I had a deadline in mind or I was going to shoot a video or I was going to do a podcast and then it didn't happen because something happened during the day, during at work. I didn't plan on it. I didn't get to the places that I wanted to get to on time. I didn't do all that.  It bothers us even if we can move past it. For example, I was trying to upload a video. YouTube was down and I had a schedule in mind for uploading a video. And, you know, I can't do anything to fix that. It's out of my control. But it doesn't stop my rampantly increasing anxiety from making me feel like what I need to do is work on it until it's fixed, even though there's nothing that I can really do. And I'd probably better sort of take a break and come back to it with a bit more of a fresh face. It may be that he's struggling with something similar to that and he doesn't want to bother you because it may seem quite silly to him as well, but he's getting upset. And around the communication, you know, our social abilities and our battery for socialising tends to be quenched. Trying to think of a descriptive word for it. It's reduced. It's flatter than it would usually be. And so we don't tend to engage in as much communication with people. It may also be that he's thinking about how to fix this situation. And it will bleed out into other areas if it's not fixed or if it's not fully processed or if it's not dealt with. It's good that he knows that he over-thinks things. That's the first step, acknowledging that, you know, you've got some maladaptive pattern of behaviour that you have, whether it's thinking about things or not.  And it may just be that he's trying to process things in his own time. He maybe doesn't need any help with it. He maybe just needs that space to relax on his own and not necessarily bombard you with messages or call you.  We're adults. We don't want to bother people as much as you'd be happy to help and you'd probably even like it. It may not be something that they want to do. And I suppose where the issues come in is when it bleeds out into other areas. I think that's the time where you have to have a conversation about it. You know, if I'm struggling, the best thing that people can do around me, if I'm getting to the point where I'm going to have a meltdown or I'm going to have a panic attack or something. I will ask people to tell me what to do. I will remove that responsibility from my head to think about what to do and how to fix this and just leave it to someone who isn't in such an anxious meltdown state. Definitely have a conversation and ask him if there are things that you can do to help him in that situation. Maybe it's okay to message and just tell me that you're having a good time but you don't necessarily have to talk about it on the spot. But just know that I'm here. There's lots of different things that you can do. And it's worth having a conversation about it if it's something that comes up a lot. I've talked about both of these things that I've talked about, the cognitive empathy and the past trauma for the first point. And also about the radio silence and bleeding into other areas, the difficult time during the day sort of impacting the rest of his day. A conversation around how you can help will probably help. As you said, he's undiagnosed so he may not listen to a lot of autism related stuff. So maybe don't frame it in that sense. And just offer some advice and ask him if you can help. Now, no expectation for communication. But don't worry about it. I realized that it can seem really a really big issue. But you know, you've got to lead him, let him have his own autonomy, independence. You can be there and you can have that conversation and you can offer your help. But really, that's the only thing that you can do. And I'm sure if you have that conversation, it'll work. And you know, there'll be things that come up and there'll be changes that you can both make that you're both happy with. Communication is key, as I said, even more key for NT and the relationships. I'm not sure you didn't say in the comment, but I'm not sure if you're autistic or not. If you're not, then take why I say quite, quite seriously. And if you are autistic, I'm sure you could understand these situations. So that that's the end of our little Q&A video. I hope you've enjoyed it. As I said at the start, if you want me to address your question in another future video, please just drop it down in the comments here. And I will pick one that I like and I will ask you if it's okay if I do a video on it. Just to make sure. And yeah, well, I'll address it next week. Obviously, follow the social medias, Asperd is growth on Instagram. Instagram, 40 other podcasts on Spotify and Apple broadcasts. And also my website, thomshandley.co.uk, where you can ask to inquire about me doing some public speaking or training or modelling portfolios up there. Yeah, I hope you have a lovely day and thanks for tuning in. See you later, folks.


What are we to believe about N.T. Wright's doctrine of imputation? What does the new perspectives on Paul do to solo fide? Destroys it. And the gospel with it. Is his view heretical? What? Is his view heretical? If it isn't, then there's no such thing as heresy. When you hear the term solo fide, what it really means is that we are saved by Christ's atoning work. We are justified in that regard. And so there's nothing that we do on our own to merit salvation, but what he has done. And that sin has been imputed to him, and then his righteousness has therefore been imputed to us by faith. And so when someone tears that down, the only label that can be offered to that person is heresy. There is in many circles a highly popular understanding, sometimes called a covenant of works, which could be simplified by saying, okay, this is how it goes. First God creates humans and tells them they've got to obey certain laws so that they will be righteous and have life. They break those laws. Then God sends Jesus, who did manage to keep God's law, thus he acquired righteousness and so life. And then God transfers, imputes, reckons whatever that righteousness of Christ to believers. So though they don't have any righteousness of their own, they now have Christ's instead. That view is a caricature. N.T. Wright is an English theologian who when you look at him, when you hear him, he sounds like a grandpa. He sounds like a well-educated person, a smart wise person, and after all, here in America for some reason we seem to place some sort of value on that British accent. But make no mistake about it. What he is saying is wrong. It's heresy. Why is that? Because it is another gospel. It is a works-based gospel. View of justification that I hold is the view that has been held by Protestants since the Reformation. And that is that justification in New Testament teaching is God's declaration, his legal declaration that we are not guilty in his sight but righteous because of Christ bearing the guilt of our sins and the punishment for our sins and Christ earning a life of perfect righteousness, a record of perfect righteousness for us. N.T. Wright and some others have come along with something called a new perspective on Paul which has a different view of justification. The idea they say is that not that we're declared legally righteous, but that God declares us to be a part of his people, members of the body of Christ. My concern about the new perspective on Paul led me to include a section, a longer section on N.T. Wright's view of justification in this second edition of Systematic Theology and here I quote from N.T. Wright. He says the basis of justification, traditionally, Protestants believed that we're justified on the basis of Christ's redemptive work. He took our penalty for our sin and his righteousness was given to us, imputed to us. But he says Wright says the basis for justification in the future on the last day will be on the basis of the entire life.  Then Wright says that gospel is not about how to be saved. The gospel is not about how to be saved? No, it's a proclamation that Christ is Lord. What that really is is a works-based salvation, meaning that we're not justified now. We're justified based on how we live and how we are when we get there. Well, one, that even nullifies what it means to be justified. That's just not what the Greek word means. The Greek word dekaouson means that we have been declared right and that we are to be treated as such. And so if we are declared right, meaning we are declared right now, then we don't have to wait until the end as NT Wright states. We don't have to wait to the end to become justified based on how we live. That would nullify Christ's purpose in coming to be this substitutionary atonement and see therein lies the greater issue that NT Wright has. He's got this view called the New Perspective on Paul, where he has kind of muddied up how we ought to view what Christ did and what the meaning of justification actually is and what the meaning of the atonement actually was. Penal substitution can be expressed in very damaging ways. And even when preachers don't intend to do this, it is quite clearly the case that this is how many, many people, particularly young people, hear it.  So he rejects substitutionary atonement.  He is very clear on what he rejects. He rejects the idea that our sins are imputed to Christ. He rejects the idea that his righteousness is imputed to us. This is not the gospel, he says, this is paganism. To worship God as one who justifies by imputation, he says, is nonsense. I quote, if we use the language of the law court, it makes no sense whatsoever to say that the judge imputes, imparts, bequeaths, conveys, or otherwise transfers his righteousness to either the plaintiff or the defendant. This is not an object, a substance, or a gas which can be passed across the courtroom. This gives the impression of a legal transaction, a cold piece of business, almost a trick of thought performed by a God who is logical and correct, but hardly one we want to worship. It goes on to say, no one will be justified until he reaches heaven. Another he says, I must stress again that the doctrine of justification by faith is not what Paul means by the gospel. The gospel is not an account of how people get saved. Really. So now, if that is what people have heard in our hearing, then we've got some serious work to do because we have taken John 3.16, God so loved the world that he gave his only son.  And then when you say that in a world where there is child abuse and domestic violence and so on, people think, I know that bully of a God and I hate him. And then the whole thing goes horribly, horribly wrong. Now it is clear when you listen to him speak, he is going to speak in such a way to where even if you listen closely and intently, it's going to be hard to kind of pin down what he does believe. So as MacArthur says, what he doesn't believe, and he's pretty emphatic on this, is what the atonement actually did. He does in the end believe in penal substitution. But Wright has this way of writing, whereby he caricatures traditional atonement theories to be the doctrine that there is an angry, bloodthirsty God and that somehow Jesus got in the way and prevented this wrathful tyrant from sticking it to us. And the reason he does this is that then this straw man can serve as sort of a foil for his own views on the atonement. So right at the end of the day, will affirm things like penal substitution. He won't affirm the imputation of Christ's righteousness to us. And part of that is because he has a defective concept of divine righteousness. It says Dr. Craig stated that he does kind of distort what we believe and brings about this caricature of God, what's happened on this end of atonement. That it is, we think that there is this angry God who is, as he says, bloodthirsty and is after his pound of flesh. And how does he put it that we think that God so hated the world that he killed his son? No, that's not how we view this and how it actually is.  Absolutely. And does he love his creation? Yes. And so what does he do about sin that his creation is infested with?  Not his hatred towards us. It's his love towards us that wants to rid us from the penalty that this sin has brought to us. This is why the Bible is clear to continually point back to the atonement under the law, what it did. And also to let us know how the atonement under the law, how it was insufficient, how it was just not simply enough. And so now we've got someone to make a better sacrifice, someone who would be a better priest, that being Jesus versus the old covenant priest, Aaron and so forth. We also have a better scapegoat, someone who takes the sins of the world and they're taken away for good, not having to have this thing, this ritual done every year, year after year after year. And there is this reminder of our guilt. And then we have the better sacrifice, this better substitutionary atonement, this better blood that is shed for us and that God accepts. God demands a shedding of blood to satisfy his wrath, to satisfy our being atoned and being reconciled to him. Then what Jews understood and what we understand as well is that if that is done, if in faith we recognize what Christ has done and we trust in what he's done, then we stand justified. And for anyone to teach something different, that is, without question, a different gospel. And I don't care how you put it. I don't care if it's a charming man like him, an older, distinguished-looking man who speaks in a grandfatherly way. I don't care who says it, even if it's him. That's heresy. That's a different gospel. And a different gospel, no matter how you wrap it, is heretical. And so is it fair to call him heretical? It absolutely is. Now, it should not come as no surprise that you're seeing this view kind of spilling over into other people. I've talked about before how Tim Mackey of the Bible Project is espousing some of these same views as it relates to heaven and hell, and also how it relates to substitutionary atonement. He didn't take it the same way that traditional Christianity has. And one thing that you ought to be aware of when traditional Christianity, what we've grown up understanding and knowing all these years is now, all of a sudden, changed because someone decided to re-examine what we've always believed as though no one else had the Holy Spirit before, as though no one else understood the gospel that no one else could read. Well, when you start getting a departure, a red light ought to go up. And NT Wright's view on Paul, this new perspective on Paul, is causing him to look at things a different way and come up with a different conclusion, which is that we are not ultimately justified until we get there. Well, that's heresy. What amazes me is that people can do this and have no fear and propagate it. And many, many young men, evangelical young men in seminary and training are influenced by Wright to believe the wrong thing, to be propagating a false gospel and denying the true gospel and have absolutely no fear and no angst and no guilt and no dread and no terror and no torture is to be void of the work of the Holy Spirit who convicts of sin and righteousness and judgment. And that's why we ought to caution people against listing someone like an NT Wright. And for that matter, the Bible Project and Tim Mackey. Here's the problem, guys. The heresies that are going to destroy and bring down different churches and hinder believers or potential believers is not coming from the outside. It's coming from the inside, people that we trust, people that we thought were believing Christians, people that we felt like had a firm grasp on doctrine, but then they start spending too much time thinking and espousing different beliefs. The Bible tells us that there is now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. For the law of the spirit of life has set you free in Christ from the law of sin and death. Notice what it says. It says it has set you free. Not will set you free, but has set you free. For God has done what the law weakened by the flesh could not do by sending his own son in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin he condemned sin in the flesh in order that the righteous requirement of the law might be fulfilled in us who walk not according to the flesh but according to the spirit. So Paul is pretty clear here. The issue is though that NT Wright says that no, that's not necessarily what he means, but it seems pretty clear to us. Paul also goes on to say something more about this and he brings this term in that is not fully understood. This term justification, verse 29 of chapter eight, he says, for those whom he foreknew, he also protested to be conformed to the image of his son in order that he might be the first born among many brothers. Here it is verse 30. And those whom he protested, he also called. Those whom he called, he also justified. And those whom he justified, he also glorified. And now we drop down to verse 33. Look what it says, who shall bring a charge against God's elect? It is God who justifies, who is to condemn. Christ Jesus, the one who died more than that, who was raised, who was also at the right hand of God who indeed is interceding for us. The sufficiency of what Christ did, his blood and him declaring us justified, him declaring us in right standing. If anyone comes to negate that, to nullify that, to preach differently, then that person is indeed preaching a different gospel. We are not saved by our actions as the logical conclusion of N.T. Wright's belief would state that we are justified at the end by our life. No, that's a different gospel. It's heresy and it should be shunned. Amen.


Despite social distancing protocols being in place during April, rapper Blueface made headlines when he held a music video shoot at his California home which went horribly wrong. Long story short, he invited a group of strippers over and a fight broke out. This wasn't the first time Blueface's LA house made the news either.  So today we'll look at where the rapper calls home. Jonathan Michael Porter aka Blueface is a rapper who rose to fame in late 2018. After releasing the music video for Respect My Cripping, he became a viral sensation due to his offbeat style of rapping. These days he's a bit of a viral sensation for more reasons than his songs. He's best known for the song Thought Tiana released in 2019 which was remixed by Cardi B and YG. He became his most successful single to date, peaking at number 8 on the Billboard Hot 100 chart. Although his offbeat rap style and voice have drawn him comparisons to rappers like E40, some might say, um, how can I say this nicely, he shouldn't be taken seriously at all. Whether or not the public wants to continue listening to Blueface's music, his song Thought Tiana and instant fame have earned him some money and sources say his net worth is around $4 million currently. That being said, he was able to invest in a California home worth over a mill and wasn't afraid to show it off. Even settling down in the Santa Clarita area, Blueface got his home publicized with everything from robberies to drama with his mom and stripper fights. Some even said his house was haunted.  I asked you guys whose house you wanted to see next and someone who got multiple requests was Blueface and I thought that's sort of an odd pick but here we go. We'll be looking at where the rapper calls home like the house he bought once he made it which seems to constantly make headlines. If you like these videos make sure you're subscribed and ring that bell to be notified when we post so you can always be up to date. We've also done house tours in the likes of 6ix9ine in French Montana and we'll link to some at the end. Follow me on Instagram because I love connecting with you guys. I've also been reading all your comments and I'm going to be responding to some at the end. I need you to let me know who to do next in the comments down below and whose home you'd like to see. Now let's get into this video. Just before we see the rapper's infamous crib in LA let's get a little background. Although I don't know what his childhood home or homes looked like, Blueface has always resided in California. He was born in LA back in 1997 and grew up in mid city and central Los Angeles where he attended multiple elementary schools. Eventually he would move with his mom in Santa Clarita Valley which is where he resides again now but for some time in between he settled in Oakland with his father. Oakland is the largest city in the East Bay region of the San Francisco Bay area with the largest port in the Bay. After finally settling down later in the San Fernando Valley, Blueface attended Arlita High School. Long story short the rapper moved around California quite a bit. Once he found fame and expanded his bank account he found his way back to the neighborhood he once lived at with his mom, Santa Clarita, California. At the young age of 22, Blueface became a first time homeowner. Since blowing up pretty fast after Thodiana apparently he afforded himself a property in California. Last spring the rapper took to Instagram posting a photo of his new crib which had his Porsche and Bentley parked in the driveway no less. He captioned the photo, I'm 22, bought my first house, the biggest one on the block, million dollar homeowner, it ain't even cheap to live in California. Couldn't have done it without WAC 100 management. Blueface is right when he says it ain't cheap to live in California. According to reports his home is valued at over 1.1 million dollars and the two car garage house is like the size of a small mansion. Like I mentioned his place is located in Santa Clarita, California which is where he lived at one point with his mom when he was younger. It's a city just north of LA known for hosting the Six Flags Magic Mountain theme park. There are also the prehistoric stone formations of Vasquez Rocks natural area park which serve as a backdrop for many films. Although he's in the suburbs he's close enough to the Hollywood action. His house is part of the Crest the community which offers homes of three different floor plans. Blueface's home spends 4,290 square feet over two floors and offers five beds and 4.5 baths. The lot itself is over 8,000 square feet as well. According to the previous listing his home was built in 2018 so it's very new and has all the expected amenities of a modern house. Aside from the master bedroom, other rooms throughout the home include a bonus room, chef's kitchen with breakfast bar, formal entryway, great room and even a loft. I bought his first house. Biggest one in the suburbs. Dead end of this thing.  Square kid. Ooh. Blueface showed off his new home last year on Instagram stories and states it's the biggest one on the street. Just from the first look we can see some floor to ceiling windows and the driver with his luxury cars. Walking in there's a double height entry and large staircase and off on one side there's a den with full glass doors opening up to the front yard. Then there's another larger living room or what may be the great room which comes complete with a fireplace and shares a large open area with the state of the art kitchen that has a center island and extra pantry. On this floor there's also the formal dining room. The whole common area also has floor to ceiling glass doors sliding out to the backyard. On the upper level he shows in his stories how many expansive bedrooms there are. There's also more than one large walkout balcony on the upper level and nice views in each of the suites. Yeah, I think about five bedrooms in this one. Dead ends for no reason. Five bedrooms just for me.  This leads to the huge walk-in closet as well. When the wrapper moved in the backyard wasn't finished and was essentially a plot of dirt. We can see there wasn't much of anything back on the grounds but according to the listing there was a hot tub spa unless they were talking about the one in the bathroom. Only time will tell if Blueface spills a pool back there too. Million dollars right here. Bop. There is also some footage posted of graffiti art that Blueface showed in his home. Some of the walls were made to be a blue camel mural with designs that reflected his personality and life.  Sonny throwing up the set. Ski. Fibby. First album. Billboard's. Yeah, that b***h on Billboard. Stop playing. Shout out to f***ing SoundCloud. SoundCloud changed my life. I wouldn't be here without it. I'm not done with it though. I got a lot of open space in the wall still. I know I'm throwing up the Worldstar logo. Cause y'all ain't even know. But Worldstar let me use their platform before I even had a deal. Before I even had a thousand dollars in my pocket. Worldstar let me use their platform. So they for a show going in this b***h. And they let me use it for free. So all them blog sites talking about he paid to be on Worldstar. Don't believe the internet cause they don't know what they talking about. They just talking. I wonder what other changes Blueface has in the works for his home. Maybe eventually he'll build a studio in his place and drop new music more frequently. Like I said Blueface's home may be a fairly new purchase for the rapper but it already has its fair share of stories. Even when he moved in people said that they saw a ghost in the window and called the home haunted. This may sound like the biggest joke but I swear you can see something lurking in that front window in his Instagram pic. Like who is that?   Johnny come down here. Down here. Almost talked about by many. Blueface told everyone the real reason why this went down.  I already got her an apartment. I guess that wasn't enough. What happened with momma now? What happened with momma and your sister? Oh uh... I'm not gonna get too far into detail. But we seen mostly. I know. I know. So it's not too much for me to... But pretty much they just came down and visited regularly. My mom got her own spot, her own thing going. She's good. My sister on the other hand, she's going through her life situation. So she came down. I was gonna help her out. Get her back going. And then they just got to a little advantage. So I kind of like had to come back a little bit because you know the expectations get higher when people tend to think you're going, you know... You got money and stuff like that. Exactly. So I had to, you know... That's your momma though. He said his momma good. Yeah, my momma good. Your momma good. She's got a whole house. She's staying in Ohio. She's good. This is really my sister. That's what they came down for. In November of last year while Blueface was in Dubai, he caught some people trying to break into his home too. He posted the footage from his security cameras which showed the three men attempting to get inside. And most recently of course there was a stripper fight. Despite the global pandemic and quarantine laws around the end of April, Blue invited what looks like a dozen or so people to his home for a music video including a group of strippers. He shared outtakes through his IG stories and one thing led to another. And the girls started squabbling. This turned into multiple boxing matches looking like something straight out of a reality TV show. So now I've seen where Blueface lives and it seems to be his first and only property at the moment.  What did you guys think of his place? Before we wrap this up, I'll read out a couple of comments from previous videos. Alright guys, that's all I got on Blueface's home in Santa Clarita, California. I'm sure with all the crazy stuff going down over there we'll only see more of it. What did you guys like or dislike about the place? Tell me in the comments down below as well as what other celebrity houses you'd like to see. Follow me on Instagram if you want to chat more and I'll see you all in the next vid. Bye!


The study estimates that between 2010 and 2030, communication technology, CT, will use up to 51% of global electricity, with wireless access networks not being the main driver for electricity usage. The analysis shows that globally generated renewable electricity is likely to exceed the electricity demand of all networks and data centers until 2030. However, the present investigation suggests that CT electricity usage could contribute up to 23% of the globally released greenhouse gas emissions in 2030. This article was authored by Anders S.G. Andre and Tomas Edler.