Today we're opening more Walmart mystery power boxes. What's up guys, we're back with another epic video. Today we're opening more Walmart mystery power boxes as you guys saw, these are different, they're yellow. They have potential premium gold or gold series in one every two boxes we have too, so we should get one out of the least two you would think. And then on the back, a lot of cool things like there's the Duel Saga, Movie Pack, Soul Fusion Special Edition, we got even another Gradycard. 2018 Megaton packs, these really cool sleeves, we got the Blue Eyes pack, Shadow of the Hala, Flaming's Attraction Battles Legend, Relentless Venge. A lot of really cool things in here, we've got two of these boxes, but first we have a giveaway. I'll be giving away these three cards, we've got three epic super rare's from Duelist Pack Yugi, all you have to do is like this video, be subscribed and let me know what you think about this mystery box compared to the previous two we've opened, the Grady Metal Raiders and the one that just came out in Walmart. Let's get into the first mystery box, you guys have been enjoying these, I happen to have a few of these laying around, so I figured why not just open all of them up, it's been pretty fun to open them up. And it's kind of cool to see where the, that's kind of cool to see where like the packs have gone from being like kind of junk before, they're a little bit more old now, a little bit more appreciated, et cetera. So it's pretty cool to see that kind of happen, because I remember opening these up on the channel a couple of years ago. They're definitely a lot more interesting now. I mean they were cool, actually everyone always loves these right when they come out, but then they kind of age even more, like even well, even more well. What am I trying to say here? Let's just, yeah, let's just keep going. We will start off, there's a lot in here. As you guys see, we can get a booster pack, one legacy pack, one mystery item and one special edition. So we're gonna start off with a booster pack. We have Code of the Duelist, our best friend Code of the Duelist. It's been in all three mystery boxes. That shows you how little people want it, also how much they credit it. So we will be going for firewall because that's what we go for. It is at least first edition. So let's see, backup secretary, FA circuit game pre, the Dark World brainwashing, the ascending of thunder, Ryco Twilight Sworn Fighter and break off trap hole. That's just a super air treasure panda. That's the one in the Exodia decks. All right, and FA, hang on Mac. Next pack up, we have, ooh, I thought it was Legend of Blue Eyes. Dark Crisis, still really cool, but it's not Legend of Blue Eyes, but still really cool. Let's see if we can pull skill drain, final countdown, Exodia neck cross, any of that awesome stuff. Shinado of course, Ultra for trivia. Sakuretsu Armor, we got already Guardian Elma, Mushroom and Dark Swarpeness. The Nintendox, Infernal Queen Archfiend and the Keldo, okay. All right, nothing in that Dark Crisis unfortunately. Next item in the first mystery box, we have Mega Tin 2017. Okay, so this just shows how old these are. I think these must have been 2018 then, if they're given out 2017, Mega Tin packs, maybe 2019. Now these older than the Metal Raiders one, I think these are the oldest ones we've opened yet. Dice Globs, we've got the Crystronic Potential, Angel Trumpeter, Magical Midbreaker Field, Formal Power, Radish Horsch, Horsch Magicians Robe, True King, Lithosajim, The Disaster, I don't know. Zodiac Dryden, okay, that's a good card. Didn't that get banned? I think that's banned. And then the True King, the Fathomer, we're gonna go with that. Dragon Core, Hexer. All right, very cool. Oh, infinite, finite cards, not infinite cards. I forgot that was even a card. Zodiac Dryden is a good card, but I'm pretty sure it got banned because of whatever his name is, Zeus. On to the next pack. I can feel our special edition. Here is our, oh, Primal Origin First Edition. This is very old at this point. I guess back then it wasn't, it was maybe like five years old but now it's like seven, eight years old. Okay, First Edition Blister Pack. Let's go to have a Ghost Rare in it. Let's hope that way it does have one. That was also another reason to buy these. You could sometimes get packs that have like potential Ghost Rares and back then there was no Ghost Rares. They hadn't brought them back yet, so that's pretty cool. Sylvan Water Slide, we got that. And the ban played on. I don't remember that card. Ancient Gear Box. Ghost Trick, so cute boss. What? And Ghost Trick Knight. All right, see, not even a guaranteed foil. That's how old that pack is. Now let's see what special edition we got. Soul Fusion? Soul Fusion, it was Soul Fusion. Okay, cool. There's actually one more pack in there if I forgot to grab. So we're gonna do this first. I guess we're looking for Pankratops, common. I mean, that's a pretty good one. Thunder Dragons, they kind of got hit, banned and stuff like that. So maybe not as good to pull now. Three, so few packs. Let's see what we get up for our, okay, Summon Sorcerer's Neo Space Connector. Very cool. Let's see about these three packs. So you do get a lot of packs out of here with the special edition, not bad. We've got the Edge Imp Cotton Eater. We gotta look for that Pankratops. That'd be nice, Predaplast. Danger Mothman Super Rare, very cool. Gravekeeper Super Naturalist. Patrick Fluffle, Mirror, and Chimera. Next pack, Soul Fusion. Give us a Pankratops, common. Gengas, we got the Salamangrape Foxy. There's a Pankratops. So that's an amazing card, got printed as a common. Very weird. I don't think I even own any of those, so that's why I'm looking for those. Morgan, the Enchantress of Avalon, very cool. Orcus Bass, Bromberd, and Salamangrape Falco. All right, final Sofu pack. I'd take another Pankratops, that'd be cool. World Dino Wrestling. We've got the Intel Noble Arms, Jack Jaguar. Herald of the Abyss, that's a super. Gokipole, Necrofusion, Stegosaur, and Spiritualist, all right. So there is a final pack that I almost forgot about. Let's pull it out. What is it? It is, oh, another Code of the Duelist. How could we forget? Is it possible to have a Mystery Box without at least one Code of the Duelist, or at least two of a really bad pack? I don't think so. So here we go. Let's not disrespect it too much. Launcher Commander, now, okay. No, if we disrespect it, we pull Firewall.  Okay, didn't work that time. We got Breakoff Traphold both times. That's kind of weird. Next Mystery Box, we have one more. Let's see if we can pull something even better this time. So we didn't get our Premium Gold or Duelist saga that time. It's one out of two boxes. So hopefully it's, you know, in one of these two. That would be nice. Okay, next Mystery Box, what will be inside? Will it be something epic? Hopefully, hopefully it will be. First pack, where is it? Where is it? Code of the Duelist. Why? Please have mercy. F.A. Sonic Meister, Air Cracket Storm, Go Go. Destiny or Dangerous, DD. Twila or Lila, Twilight Sworn Enchantress. There we go. There we go. Not Twila, Samurai Skull and Twilight Cloth. Next pack, please don't be Coded the Duelist. Please don't be Coded the Duelist.  There's something. Code of the Duelist. I have opened so many of these just by default from the Mystery Products. Like, it's crazy. All right, Backup Secretary, Dark World, Brainwashing, Rhett, Re-X, Luma, Twilight Sworn, Shaman. Okay, we got a Secret Rare. Finally something decent. I don't know if this card's too good, but it is a Secret Rare. We will take that. Yay. All right, we finally got a card out of Code of the Duelist. Surely no more Code of the Duelist now, right? Surely not. I filled two more packs. Let's see if this is it. Invasion of Chaos. Here we go. Invasion of Chaos. Let's go. Can we pull it? We've got the Pinchopper. Blasting the Ruins. Stumbling. Come on, can we get Chaos Emperor, BLS, the Dark Magician of Chaos? Stealth Bird, it's the next card, is the Rare because that means we didn't get anything. Dang it. Nothing out of Invasion of Chaos. This one hasn't been too great. Let's see if we can grab the, is this the last pack here? Oh, another Megaton. So it looks like these were exactly the same except the Legacy pack was different. All right. Megaton's pretty cool. I don't feel great about the Code of the Duelist, of course, but we will continue on Dokey Bird, the Speed Roid Zodiac, Zodiac sign. Pre-preparation, right? Boop, boop, boop, boop. Coast Reaper and Ritter Cherries again? And Floodgate Trap Hole. That's a couple of decent cards. We pulled that twice. That's really weird. Am I thinking of a different video? I don't think we pulled this. Maybe I'm thinking of a different video. I've recorded a lot of videos today because I'm gonna be out of town for Christmas. So yeah, I'm thinking of the Amazon Mystery Box. I think we pulled that out of one pack. Yeah, okay. That makes sense. I'm getting very confused. I don't normally record a lot of videos on one day, so it's a little bit different. Okay, we've got the Special Edition and the... Hopefully it's another Pryo. That'd be cool. It is another Pryo. Okay, that's pretty cool. Primal Origin Booster Pack. That's exciting actually. Can we get a Ghost Rare or Ultimate Rare this time? Because they are in this set. We've got a Galactic Charity right off the bat. Very cool. The Artifact Aegis. Phantom King. Hyde, Hyde Ride. Sylvan, Lotus Wing. Ghost Trick, so cute boss again. Oh wait, that's our Rare. No, I don't want it to be so cute. Come on. And finally, our Special Edition. Another Soul Fusion, so we didn't get Duel of Saga or Premium Gold, unfortunately. But that's okay. More chances at Pankratops. More chances, I guess, at Colossus. Is that what we're looking for? What else is good in this set? I can't remember. I'll probably pop it up on the screen. Same exact promos. So these missed... Okay, nevermind. We got this Soul. That's different. These Mystery Boxes have been very consistently the same. Which is pretty ironic for a Mystery Box. Three packs to end it. Can we pull something epic? Soul Fusion. I love the artwork on this. It looks really cool of the pack artwork, I should say. We got Edge Imp, Cotton Eater. We got World Legacy, World Wand. Predaplast, World Dino Wrestling. Thunder Dragon Duo, that's from Duel Links. I mean, that's played a lot there. Helio, Crusadia and Dino Wrestler. Capio Raptor? Two more packs. Send us the like button for luck, guys, or hit the like button. Subscribe if you're enjoying the video. We got a World Dino Wrestling until Dumbled Arms. Jack Jaguar, Parallel Panzer. Danger Dog Man. Thunder Dragon Matrix, okay. Dino Wrestler, Stegosaurus and Orcstrated Core. One more pack. Give us another pack, that'd be cool. Six packs, total of Soul Fusion. We've gotten one, that's not too bad. Orcstrated Attack, Invincibility Barrier, Emerald Eagle. Thunder Dragon Titan, we got a Secret Rare. That is very, very cool. Pretty sure this is the one that's actually like, isn't it banned? Or is it terrible? It's one of the two. It's either banned or terrible. Yeah, pretty big range there. Stegosaurus, Capio Raptor and Spiritualist. No bankruptops. If you guys enjoyed the video, make sure to subscribe for more epic content in the future. Shout out to TCG Trusted Cards, Tomato Juice, Noah J. Stanley, Mike Nance, Mimic Gecko, Duelist Kingdom Cards and Specky McFarland. Thank you guys for supporting the channel and I'll see you guys next time. Peace.


At these extremely small distances, quantum mechanics plays a dominating role. A proton travels as a wave, described by Schrodinger's equation. As a wave, its exact location is not completely knowable. The square of the particle's wave function gives us the probability for materializing as a particle at any particular location and time. Most of the time, it will be found at the most probable location. But we see that some of the wave function is on the far side of the barrier. The wave amplitude is significantly smaller, but the frequency is the same. The small amplitude indicates that there is a small probability that it will materialize there. But having the same frequency indicates that it will have the full particle energy. The phenomenon is called tunneling. At the Sun's temperature, the probability that a proton will tunnel through the barrier is quite small, but 193 orders of magnitude more likely than classical physics would have it. Protons will cross the barrier and overlap many times before they actually trigger a fusion event. To be exact, converting probabilities to rates, we see that on average, there are a million successful tunnelings through the Coulomb barrier to get one fusion. This is because, in order to fuse, a pion transfer between the two protons or something similar has to occur in the extremely short period of time that the protons are in contact. This particle sharing in the nucleus is similar to the electron sharing that binds molecules. We cover how this works in the Higgs-Boson segment of the How Small Is It? video book. In addition, one of the protons has to eject a neutrino and a positron to become a neutron. All these nuclear processes are sensitive to proton energies, that is, temperature. To conclude, we see that small increases in the colliding proton's energy driven by increases in temperature will increase collisions, cross-sections, Coulomb barrier penetration rates, and fusion rates for overlapping protons. The accumulative effect makes the hydrogen burn rate exponentially sensitive to temperature.


Okay, we're rolling. Can you introduce yourself? Yeah, I'm Ian Monroe. I'm a member of the Board of East Bay for everyone. And you have a strong opinion about Prop 6? Yes. First of all, what is Prop 6? So here's the political context for Prop 6. It is basically a get-out-the-vote operation by Republicans to help their congressional races in the Central Valley and the Orange County. So that's literally why it's on the ballot. So they went out and got signatures and got this whole thing on the ballot because they're trying to keep Republicans in the house? Yeah, yeah. So you don't really like your congressional rep, but you do want to come to the polls so you can come vote for this. And so what it is, it repeals SB 1, which was a pretty... which increases the gas tax and taxes on cars and it also indexes the gas tax so we don't have to keep doing this. Because basically right now the gas tax is... I just had a certain rate, so essentially every year there's a cut in the gas tax, just automatically because of inflation. So it's not index to inflation, so basically every year it goes down? It goes down in real terms, yeah. And what it does is it funds transit and infrastructure and just like road maintenance. So actually kind of funny, one of the things Republicans didn't like about SB 1 was that it didn't build enough roads because to them that's what gas taxes are for, for building new roads. But of course in California and most of the country we actually have a big infrastructure maintenance problem. So it addresses that. Mostly it addresses the maintenance problem by making sure we're keeping the roads that we have in good order. And then also it does do ongoing funds for BART and AC Transit and all that transit that we love. So just all kinds of transit, like fixing potholes, keeping BART running on time, all that kind of stuff. Yeah. Okay, awesome. Okay, so I assume you are in favor? No. No one prop six. No one prop six, right? Okay. Yeah. Okay. That's pretty straightforward. Yeah, so because the thing about prop six is that I see this as kind of it's a continuation of like the tax revolt that we first saw with prop 13. And so like here's our legislature. They went to Sacramento. They made a really hard choice and raised the gas tax, which is really hard to do. And it's great that they did that. So kind of like we, the people of California need to support them. We need to have a revolt against this tax revolt, kind of the counter revolutionaries. Right.  The other thing the prop does is it actually makes it so that in the future any future gas tax will have to come before the voters. So it makes the constitution itself even worse than it was before. So lots of good reasons to vote against prop six. No one six. Right. Okay.  We're about housing. How would we like make the connection? You know what I mean? Like if we're about housing, like what you're saying makes perfect sense to me. And I'm totally important. But if I work someone, but if I need to be for everyone, all I care about is housing, right? What do I care about prop six? So kind of directly, you know, housing and transit and transportation have always been very connected. You can't really have one without the other. A house is a place is located so you can get to work somewhere and to have fun in the city or whatever. So these things are very related. I think also kind of more broadly and kind of philosophically is like, do we want government to do things? Do we want to pay for government? And I think at least pay for everyone. We believe the answer is yes, but eventually we need government to help us solve this housing crisis and yes, we want our politicians to make hard choices. And so when they make a hard choice that's the correct choice, we need to be there to support them, basically. Because with housing, of course, there's tons of really hard choices that we ask our politicians to make. So I see a pretty strong parallel there. You have to say anything else you want to say about it? Vote no on Prop 6. Alright, thank you.


I'm Marcia Joyner and we are navigating the journey and today's journey is into my world, the world of seniors and active living and I am a senior. So today we are visiting with the lovely lady, Meryl O'Neill, and Meryl is the director of programs at the Waikiki Community Center and we are talking about active aging. See, I told you we are in the world. My journey. And my journey. Okay. What, we have so many terms, words for seniors and old folks and all kind of things. What is it we're talking? We're talking about individuals, adults, mature adults that are older. I think that's the most neutral way of saying it, seniors conjure age in kind of a negative way. It is. Yeah. And what we've discovered in working with our older mature adults is that we're kind of stigmatized by that thing called age. So age is kind of a bad word. It has been because people think when you talk about aging and getting old, that you have to have arthritis and you've got to have aches and pains and you don't remember anything and it's like people are scared to death of getting old. They are. They are. And I was actually pretty surprised to find some of the, my daughter's peers that are really terrified about aging. You know, so it really has kind of a boogeyman image. I remember when my mother passed away when she was 101 and she always said to me, never ever tell people your age no matter how much they persist to find out how old you are. And I said, why is that? She says, because as soon as you tell them your age, they assume certain things about you. And today that's called ageism. Yes. It's called ageism. And one of the biggest hurdles as an older mature adult that we have to, that we encounter is that people assume certain things about how you're going to be, whether you're able to navigate on your own, even if you've been doing it for 60, 70 or 80 years. It just baffles me. My husband's oldest son just turned 65. So we both wrote to him to welcome him into the Legion. Welcome aboard. So that it was light and fun and not scary, the boogeyman and all that kind of stuff. Exactly. Exactly. So it's really an accomplishment to have been able to survive and navigate the journey in a way that you are still together and still able. And what often happens as well as we mature and get older, is that people see retirement as a time to let go. And that's not where it is. That word retirement, and most people when they had labor jobs, when people worked their butts off, retirement was a time to relax. Yes. But now, what are you going to do when you retire? Exactly, because the average American that retires at, say, 65 has another 20 or 30 years of a really good productive life. And for the most part, with the improvements in medicine and pharmaceuticals, we can continue to live a very productive life. Now, whether people choose to or not, or plan to or not, is another question. And that is currently one of the hurdles. You look so forward to that time of relaxation that you fail to think about, oh, my goodness, I have 20 or 30 years. And what am I going to do with it? And Hawaii, of course, and our population of gray hair is growing. Yes, yes, yes. In fact, Hawaii is the fastest growing gray hairs in the 50 states. We surpass all other states in that percentage of the population. I would think it used to be Florida when everybody went because it's warm. Exactly. And now, the weather makes it easy to navigate. You don't have to shovel snow, and you don't have to buy winter coats, and do all of those things. Or deal with hurricanes. For hurricanes. At the level that they've been getting in that part of the country. Yeah, exactly. And even though cost of living is enormous, it is still a comfortable way to live. Exactly. You know, 50 years ago, the state of Hawaii did some really early planning and initiated the Commission on Aging, which is now the Executive Office of Aging. And what they estimated was this population growth. They estimated between 1980 and 2035 that the population of Hawaii would grow by 65%. Now, when they looked at the population numbers for 65 and older, that growth rate was at 310%. So from 1980 to 19 to 2035, the anticipated or estimated growth rate is at 310%. And for those over 85, that percentage estimate is 1158%. Oh my, people are just living longer. They're living longer. And the other thing that you mentioned about people moving, the in-migration of our mainlanders retiring here in Hawaii has added to that. Plus the lower mortality rate. Plus the fact that most ethnic groups are not bearing children. Very few of them. So then with the improvements in medicine and pharmaceuticals, all of that have added to this enormous, almost unmanageable population growth. It seems that way anyway, when you look at just the numbers or trying to drive on the highway. Oh my, yes, yes, yes. So it's not so much those under 65 that are growing, but that population is in the 65 and over. And so we then look at challenges and opportunities. Back then when the commission was formed, which was 55 decades ago, talk about future planning, the whole focus on aging was about sick care. And the reality is that there's not enough money to build the infrastructure to care for people properly if they're in the paradigm of being sick. So what has happened, I think it was 2002, the United Nations actually proclaimed a new alternative to aging called active aging. And we recently at the Waikiki Community Center have grabbed the reins of that particular horse and saying, you know, there are too many people that are 65 and older that still remain active, are still active in their community, have a lot to give, not only to their families. And on the other side, the issue is, but they're not respected. Well, and, you know, it used to be mandatory 65, retirement age. Now people are not retiring of 65. No. They still working until they just don't want to do it anymore. Exactly, exactly. And you know, with the extra 20 or 30 years, I don't know if the 401Ks will be able to sustain people for that length of time, because originally when 401Ks were put together, they were put together for a shorter retirement than 20 or 30 years. So I have a slide on active aging and what the purpose of active aging is. What we're attempting to do in all the programs that we support is extending our health span to equal our lifespan.  Yes. So that's the point of active aging. There's another slide that addresses the 10 areas of focus for, you know, being successful in active aging. And so one of them, of course, is to determine your life purpose. And I think, Marcia, you've been really successful in being able to do that from a very young age. You see, let me tell you about this. Being my size, as a child, I used to love to go to the waterfront and see the tugboats pushing the big. And I decided I was a tug because I was smaller than anybody. And I wanted to be, I thought I was six feet tall, but I'm a tug. But I could push the big one. So I grew up thinking, I'm a tug. I'm a tugboat. And I can do this. Yeah, it's, you're definitely exemplary. I honor you for that. I honor you for that. And I appreciate the fact that you continue to stay deep into, you know, the effectiveness and the liveliness of our community. And I think that you're not an exception. No. There are a lot of people. And a lot of people at the same time also need to be awakened to the fact that they can pursue their passion. Because after all, you know, you have a retirement income. You're able to do the things you want to do. So why not get passionate and hustle? Because, you know. Even when I didn't have the income, I had to bet. I know. I understand that. Yeah, some people are just self-generating, you know, without having to really think about it. When, but that isn't the, so many people outlive their finances. Yes. And that is an issue. So when you look at the facets to active aging on that chart, one of the areas is financial. It's physical, medical, nutritional, financial. Consumer protection, which is a big issue these days with people calling on the phone or sending you email and saying, you know, my grand, your grandchild is in prison and we need to bail, you know, that stuff. So consumer protection, mental issues, you know, the functioning of the brain, the cognitive ability and how to maintain those social issues. I recently found out that social isolation, a person who is socially isolated, the effects of that isolation is equal to an individual smoking a pack of cigarettes a day. Really? Yeah, really. I don't know this for sure, but I think that, let's assume you're 65 and you move away from Kansas and you move to Hawaii, your children and grandchildren are still there, now you are alone. Right. So what would that do?  Yes. What does that do to you? Well, that's social isolation, you know, and we are social beings, so we all need to have connections. Yes. Some of us have the ability to do that naturally. Others of us, not so much. So the Waikiki Community Center as an example is that place where people can come to exercise, socialize, play games, you know, do things, get involved in volunteer activities. And most recently, we've been doing civic engagement activities where we've audited the condition of our streets so that they're walkable. We have done pedestrian safety. We need to take a break and when we come back, we will find out what else you can do at the community center. Right, wonderful. We'll be right back. Thank you. Aloha, everyone. I'm Christine Linders and this is Think Tech Hawaii. My show is Movement Matters and this is a show brought to you to talk about how to get rid of things like your low back pain, scoliosis, TMJ dysfunction, ankle sprains, pretty much anything that you can do with your body or hurt your body. I am here to bring to you the cutting-edge strategies that you can do right now easily on your own to help get out of pain and get back to doing what you love. Life is better when you listen to your physical therapist. Tune in Tuesdays at 11 a.m. every other week for Movement Matters. Aloha. Aloha and welcome. My name is Mark Shklav. I am the host of Think Tech Hawaii's Law Across the Sea program. Every other Monday at one o'clock, I am here on deck with various guests talking about different topics of the world and the ocean and international law, different areas where we all have seen and want to travel to and learn about. Please join me for my next Law Across the Sea program. Aloha. Aloha. I'm Marsha and we're back. And we are navigating the journey into being a senior, into active aging. I love that. Active aging, yes. Exactly. And we're talking with Meryl O'Neill who is the director of programs at the Waikiki Community Center. And if you haven't been there, you really must go. It doesn't cost you anything and if you can find parking, it's free. Yes, you can find parking. And well, you know, Waikiki can be, the street parking can be a bear. Right. But now. That's how we're in Oasis. We have parking. Speaking of which, the Waikiki, I was there one day, the Waikiki Community Center is my memory of Old Hawaii. And this particular day, there were ukulele lessons. Yes. And the breeze was blowing through the trade winds and it was like, it took me way back to be in this location because they've been there, how long? 40, well, we've been incorporated for 41 years. But prior to that, we actually took over the St. Augustine's Elementary School buildings. So we're on the site of where the school used to be. Yes. Yes. So I have no idea when that is, you know, when they originated. Like I said, that feeling. Exactly. And if you haven't been there, I suggest you do. Even if it's just for that little bit of Old Hawaii that's still there, that part that, oh, well, I guess if you knew, you don't know that. But that stirs something inside. Yes, yes, yes. When Waikiki was magic. It's still magic. Before all of the concrete. Yes, before all of the concrete. Well, actually the Community Center sits on the property of Queen Liliu Kalani. And what is Paul Kalani Avenue was a stream, you know, because All Hawaii Canal wasn't there, right? Yes. So the stream flowed on the street and people remember, remember that kind of, you know, old time, very comfortable, easygoing kind of experience, which is probably what you experienced. That was, it was a feeling. Yes. As I'm hearing the Liliu Kalani because I'm doing lessons. And I was outside with you and the trade winds, it was like, oh, yes, yes, yes, yes. I'm glad you caught that because it is, it's subtle unless you can recall the memory. And I try to let people know that we are on very special ground. I've been very fortunate to be endowed that particular, you know, piece of property. It is. So tell me about this aging as an asset. I love that. Well, you know, we talk about 20 or 30 years of not having to report to a job, right? And all of a sudden you find yourself with so much time. Well, what do you do with that time? So it's a time when, and we talk about this when we talk about civic engagement as an example. It's a time when you can follow your legislators on issues that really matter to you. You know, one of the things that we're proposing for this next session is the requirement and enforcement of emergency plans for condominiums and apartments. Now currently, there's a fire regulation for that. There is nothing for disaster preparedness and the requirement requires that people actually plan for drills like we used to in school drills twice a year. Now, how much of a difference would that make to a building community as an example in terms of peace of mind, you know? So there's things like that that people can promote. Sidewalk and street walking safety is another big issue in Waikiki that we have begun to take the initiative for. And we need people to show up, volunteer, talk about it, and bring it to their local legislators because street safety is so important for all of us, no matter whether you're keiki or kupuna. Well, can I make a suggestion? Sure. You need to do it now. You don't wait until the legislature convenes in January. You need to do it now. Talk to them now because this is when bills are formed. Right, right. Not in January, but now. Right. We're actually in discussion with our senator and of course our councilman. So it's a time when people have the opportunity to really take on a passion. Yes. You know, it's also a time when people want to continue to work, but maybe they don't want to do as serious a job as they did. No. But there are many, many businesses that are looking for individuals that one have a work ethic. Two are dependable and basically the market right now is wide open for employment. Our challenge in this area, of course, is ageism. And so we have a program at the center where we will interview, prepare, and begin to place individuals in different kinds of positions. And that's relatively new. That is. You know, but people need, there are people that are not as fully funded as others and want to continue to be able to choose the activities, you know, that they want to get involved with. And sometimes that might be to go on an outing or to go out to have lunch or dinner without feeling like you're pressured because you don't have the funds for it. So let's talk about your upcoming fair, your event. I love the way you spell fair. Thank you. Thank you. I often get, you know, comments about that. And the whole purpose of the fair is one, because it's for seniors, and two, because people ask questions, is that spelled correctly? That auto on my computer, every time I type it, the auto correct would come back. Exactly. Exactly. But it's kind of a reminder to people. We'll spell it so people will understand what we're talking about. Exactly. It's spelled F-A-I-R-E, which is the old English style of spelling. So you have, we have a poster. Yes, we do. There it is. There it is. But it's spelled without the E. Oh, a typo that we didn't catch. Yes. It is F-A-I-R-E. See your auto correct. Yeah. If you go to the, somebody auto corrected. So if you go to the other, the other graphic, I don't know if you can find it, or if you deleted it, it does spell. Yes, there it is. There it is. But basically what we're offering at this senior wellness fair, it's called refresh, rejuvenate, and reset. Because it's an opportunity for you to refresh what you're doing, get rejuvenated, and stimulated by the opportunities and resources that are there, and then reset and start the year. Now, we plan it for October because it's Medicare renewal time. Yes. And we have all the Medicare program representatives there to answer any question that you might have, or for you to consider switching over from one to another. It's kind of complicated because of ABCD and all the supplements. So it's a good time to kind of get grounded. It is. And we will be there, and you look at the banner and it says, what does the banner say? Navigating the journey. Right. So come talk to me and visit with me and take the time to visit with all of the people that are there. Right. And we don't buy. And we don't sell. Yeah, we have nothing to say. So you can follow up, you can meet the people on a one-to-one basis, get them to know them by their first name, pick up the phone and call them. And we have some really unusual resources from Compassion and Choices. We have the medical marijuana dispensary represented there, where you can ask all the questions you wanted, want to ask, without being embarrassed about asking. Because it's very new to people, some of these services. Other services include the employment and the senior referral services that are at the Waikiki Community Center. Please join us, it's free. Yes, and you don't, are there any items that are for sale? No, we're not. We don't allow any kind of selling whatsoever. No selling at all, yeah. And so, but people can give away samples if they have. Absolutely, we're encouraging people to do that. I don't have any. I just want to. We here at Think Tech don't have any samples. Well, okay. So I just want to also mention that we have benefited tremendously this year by the sponsorship of Hawaii USA. And they will come and actually do financial planning, just plain old budgeting, whatever you need to inquire about how to manage your finances. So thank you, Hawaii USA. Well, now what I want you to do is to look in this camera and tell us exactly about the fair, the time, the place, and everything right there. Okay, the Refresh, Rejuvenate, and Reset Senior Wellness Fair is planned for Tuesday, October the 8th, from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. at the Waikiki Community Center. The address is 310 Kawakalani Avenue. We're in the heart of Waikiki, two blocks, Ewa, or west of the zoo. You come, you drive on from Kapahulu to Kuhio. Take the first right, which is Kawakalani. We're about three quarters way down the street. Take a left and park. We ask people to please carpool. We have overflow parking at Jefferson Elementary on Waianani Way. Very good. And the time? The time is 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Please join us. Yeah, please join us and let's have fun. And there'll be about 30 different kinds of resources to help you to actively age to address any kind of issue that you might have. You're welcome to come. Thank you. Well, thank you. And it's been a real pleasure always spending this time with you. And we'll see you on the 8th. That's correct. That's Tuesday. At the Waikiki Community Center. Aloha. And I'll see you next time.


All right, I clicked the stop recording button. So the first half that I'm gonna post would just be the randomizer. The second half's gonna be the break, guys. So sorry about that. I clicked the stop recording instead of breaking scene switch. All right, you guys. So here's the list, guys. One, two, three for the left. Four, five, six for the right. And it's a one. One, two, three. So these five boxes, guys, we'll use them for another five box break.  Relic stuff. I mean, yeah, like some of these guys obviously get drafted, right? And possibly even attend some type of spring training or something, right?  But they already create like a bowman card for them. What really, what company that really does more college stuff is more Panini. Cause I think at the time they have like licensing to with like colleges, but obviously I assume with tops kind of almost having everything now. They can probably do some type of college stuff too. Like they have a football and basketball, but it's mainly college products has always been like prism draft fix and stuff like that. Well, they'll have like their college uniform if they go to college. But this is all prospect stuff though. So some of these guys at the time could have been, could have went to college instead of actually playing for the respective team they got drafted by, but they got to photograph them though with their professional uniform and anything. But I mean, you're going to see it like a lot of Adley, Lopey, right? Stuff in here, it's just going to be, it's just going to be obviously like a second year, third year prospect.  But it turns out obviously Lopey has made it up a little bit quicker than he has. Although Jason Dominguez is getting the call up this weekend, right? Is he playing today? Aaron Zabato, I remember he was actually a bigger chase for the Minnesota Twins at the time. That's an orange, De La Rosa first, Edward Perez to 99, autograph from Milwaukee. And I think he was part of a trade. He's not really on the Toronto Blue Jays anymore, but is a first there still with them. Little Lopey, all right, Zabato first, torque. Nice, there's Jason Dominguez to 125. Yankee's going to Matt. There's Josh Young as well, it's kind of cool. Lopey, Zabato, and Jake Eddard. CJ Catham, or Chatham to 125. Christopher Morel, there's a first right there. Tony Agomas, there's a Blaze Jordan first. And nice Aaron Zabato for the Minnesota Twins. That is going to David M. Lopey with Junior, Massimo Acosta, Kevin Alpintara, and then Hunter Green, Orange, number to 75. Diaz, a little color match for the Colorado Rockies to 10. There you go. Bryce Terang, ooh, we got a red coming up, how about that? And it's Jonathan India, the 15 red color match there for the Cincinnati Reds. That's David M. Gosson Martin. And Jose Rodriguez for the White Sox, going to David. Nice break for you, buddy. Jeter Downs to 125. Bonus Auto, Raleigh Thompson, what a Jason Dominguez. Some colors, we got Zabato, Parazotto, Etter, Red India, Diaz, Purple, Zabato Auto, Rodriguez, and Thompson. There you go, guys. Again, I'll repost this back up, we can run it back. If you guys like it, JaspysCaseBreaks.com.


or anyone close to you who is experiencing the symptoms of PTSD make sure you are coming for treatment at the right time. Now treatment for PTSD, the first line of treatment is usually therapy, psychotherapy which can include cognitive behaviour therapy, trauma-focused cognitive behaviour therapy, eye movement, desensitisation and reprocessing therapy and other such psychotherapeutic treatments. Also, anti-depressants are given if PTSD goes to a level of complicated PTSD. So make sure you are coming for treatment at the right time and make sure you are taking care of yourself and your loved ones.


Hello all and welcome to the session. Today the question is, find the name proportional between 18 and 8. Now before starting this question, we should know about the result of a proportion. And that is if A, B, C are in continuous proportion, then A is to B is equal to B is to C. And we also know that product of means is equal to product of experience where these two terms are called the means and these two terms are called the experience. Therefore product of means will be B into B that is B square is equal to product of extreme that is A into C. So this gives B square is equal to AC. This implies B is equal to square root of AC. Therefore B is called the mean proportional between A and C. So this will work as a key idea for solving out this question. Now let us start with the solution. The mean proportional between 18 and 8 according to the formula which is given in the key idea will be equal to square root of 18 into 8 which is equal to square root of 18 into 8 is 144 which is equal to 12 as the square root of 144 is 12. Therefore the mean proportional between 18 and 8 is 12. So this is the solution for the given question and that is all for this session. Hope you all have enjoyed this session.


What is up, everybody? Welcome to the Fando fantasy Q&A for Thursday night football for week 13 I Kind of use this bit a lot But I'm gonna be the first to say I can't believe it's week 13. It feels like the season has flew by But we got a pretty intriguing game To kick off the weekend tonight with the Dallas Cowboys at the New Orleans Saints dome game That's always good for fantasy points over under 46 According to Fandle sports books spread six and a half in favor of the road Cowboys, of course We have starting quarterback news with Taysom Hill starting for the Saints his salaries a little bit low on Fandle so we'll talk about how that impacts Civil game slate strategy for tonight's matchup, but as always this is a Q&A so get those questions ready for the YouTube Twitch Twitter whatever Facebook whatever whatever your Platform of choice is get those questions ready get those in and we will break down this game But we can also break down this weekend. I get a lot of start-sit questions during this show Which I usually try to get to of course, I'm focusing Primarily on single-game strategy for the Thursday night game But I will recommend that everyone goes to number fire calm and Checks out my start-sit column, which is a little not a little bit of a non-traditional start-sit column It it shows basically every player you would consider in a 12 team league and They're their probability through thousands of slate simulations based in number fires projections that they finish as Relevant fantasy assets of a quarterbacks tight ends. It's top 12 weeks for running back and receiver. It's top 24 weeks So I always point people to that because it can really help you contextualize the odds and the probability And really how close certain things are between the players you're trying to figure out whether you should start or sit Usually it's pretty close. And if you look at rankings, it can be hard to gauge that So that's one of my favorite pieces that I do over at number fire But you also check out the full DFS slate preview Podcast that I do with Jim Sonos called the heat check we do that every Thursday that we recap the slate every Monday We went through a lot of relevant trends for this week key injuries and how that's impacting us And our in our view of the slate. I talked about the probability that certain players Certain receivers at low salaries actually have big games from a DFS standpoint So it's not all just your straight-up picks With with no no sort of deeper analysis. I think a lot of times that that When I look back I'm most impressed by like the the trends that we dig into and I go through The the low salary receivers and how that impacts the slate for this week because we have running back value But we have stud running backs with Jonathan Taylor and Joe mix and but whether whether the Value at receivers viable or not is a different question. So again get those questions in And I'm gonna start by breaking down as I always do this slate from a top-down perspective And again, I feel free to throw me those starts at questions But if you have specifics on this game Those are much preferred because it's a lot easier to answer specifics than it is to go through plays You know one by one just kind of whatever I see for tonight Speaking of that top-down view. I like to start with passing rushing and receiving defense Numbers for each side in the game That we are featuring We have the Dallas defense rating out as a top six unit in terms of passing that expected points per drop back Allowed to opposing quarterbacks their top 10 and success rate So the success rate number being top 10 really implies that they don't allow really consistent gains and adjusted for quarterback opponents They've been pretty good from an adjusted fantasy point per drop back standpoint These saints a little bit more of a mid-level defense in terms of stopping the pass Where their strength is is right here against running backs This is something that the saints have been pretty good at all season Obviously, they're they're just outliers in this sense And you know, usually when you see a massively negative rushing net expected points per carry number You can say okay, maybe that's in fumbles. Maybe they're a little bit overrated from that standpoint, but With the rushing success rate being so low You know that it's it's really hard to turn out consistent gains against this defense on the ground So that could push the Cowboys to a little bit more of a pass-heavy script And they're already pretty pass-heavy ranking 13th and pass rate in the NFL Looking at there basically non garbage time plays ruling out when their pre snap win probabilities below 20% Above 80% they are super fast and they like to throw the ball Injected in this matchup. Dak Prescott should have plenty of passing volume That might not necessarily funnel to the running backs for the Cowboys with Ezekiel Elliott and Tony Pollard because Saints just kind of put the clamps down on running backs in general of course From a rushing standpoint, but also specifically from a receiving standpoint And then we have pretty beatable matchups here as far as the wide receivers go Both teams outside the top 20 in player level adjusted Fandall points per target allowed to receivers the saints pretty stingy I Against tight ends also I misspoke Dallas puts the clamps down on on running backs out of the backfield The saints are a little bit more susceptible so that would lead to potentially a little bit more Tony Pollard action out of the backfield So that's my bad Lots of numbers to look at here But also we see that the Saints pretty typically an up-tempo offense And we would expect that this pass rate number to stay pretty low with tasting pill That's what we saw with him last year in his starts He did average over 200 passing yards per game About 10 carries a game 50 rushing yards per contest. It's pretty much what we should expect here For the Saints to keep this one close most likely we're looking at Taysom Hill to Run the ball for this team to keep the ball on the ground. No, I haven't come here It's going to go through marketing room primarily But that's kind of the recipe for the Saints for tonight digging into some optimal lineup trends based on comparable games in my database This goes back to 2019 Looking at games with totals of 44 to 48 spreads of about you know Four and a half to eight and a half so about those middling spreads. It's kind of what we get tonight That's Decent right like that's a decent spread, but it's also not blowout potential at least from a spread perspective in these games We see that quarterbacks Typically end up as the MVP more frequently than they do in overall games because the total still high enough For quarterbacks to generate production But not so high that we're seeing tons of production from the flex level players the flex position players So we see that the quarterbacks outperform Expectation by about six percentage points running backs in these game scripts have actually underperformed overall Tight ends still always low. I don't think we really have a tight end viable MVP option for tonight And then receivers dip down a little bit again kind of going back to the fact that you need really high over unders for wide receivers to have blow-up games overall the totals Decent it's not bad, but it's also not 50 plus that's usually whenever we can see receivers Really go off as far as MVP splits. We see that the MVP in similar games to this one Comes from the favorite in about 65% of these lineups That's up from 59% in the overall split and of course the most common the most likely MVP incomparable games to this is the favorite quarterback, which puts us primarily on Depress Scott Which shouldn't be surprising and he does right out top in my simulations, which I'll get to in just one second But notably whenever the MVP does come from an underdog in These games it still is like a wide receiver. I don't know if You got to be pretty Contrarian to go with Trayquan Smith or Marquez Callaway at your MVP Very easily could could pay off because we have such obvious MVP options that don't include the Saints receivers but that's kind of one angle depending on how How out there you'd like to get with your game theory and then as always kickers about the same in this split because realistically this is about a down the barrel type of game Middling spread middling over under it's pretty comparable to a lot of games and kickers In the overall split about 34% likely to make it into the optimal lineup and about 34% likely in these games as well All right, I'm gonna jump into some questions Most likely if they're about the single game I will show Well, I'll show you guys my simulations anyway for tonight But let's just see let's get caught up here a question from Josh on Facebook. Should I bench Wilson in Metcalf? so Not saying this to promote my own work, but this is a perfect example of Why I like the start sit column that I do on number fire again You can just go to number fire calm and find it should be featured toward the top of that page, but The question is who are your alternatives? And that's the crux of the start sit piece But it'll show you The the frequency that Russell Wilson is a top 12 quarterback And it just depends on who you have available and if they are much more likely or even remotely more likely To finish as a top 12 password than Russ then you can really Decide from there as for Metcalf.  I'm a little bit worried about his target shares have been pretty bleak The past few weeks the results haven't been there. I don't know if he's banged up But they've been going to Tyler lock it more that connections been back before the Russ and DK Metcalf connection has been so Again, it's hard to say to bench DK Metcalf at all, but he still he still writes out as a pretty solid Play overall according to the slate simulations that I run to generate the start sit column But I would say check that out and see who your options are who might be available on the waiver wire Who's on your bench and compare DK's odds to theirs? Question from Grim fan Gallops value tonight is Cooper playing. So yeah, all three of the top receivers for The Cowboys are going to be Active it's the third time all season week one and like week nine I think when they played the Falcons whatever week that was and I have some notes on the usage among those top three receivers But as far as actual value goes for Gallop, he's fine The salary of ten thousand five hundred. It's not too high. It's not too low It it's fine I think that he's a pretty clear number three which is not like a hot take But I'll get to those numbers here and again the two games that all three receivers have played And they haven't really played full games in either of those with Gallop leaving early It's just kind of a messy situation CDLM leads the Cowboys with a 24 percent target share Cooper's at 22 percent so close But you know a little bit behind and then Michael Gallops down at 13 percent So that makes them sound like a distant third and while I still would rank him third regardless Here's one number that I think is at least impressive for Gallop's potential tonight Because we're looking at such small samples rather than divide targets by game We can divide it by routes run and in that context lamb leads that trio with 32 percent So you've got a target on 32 percent of his routes in these games that these guys shared Cooper's at 23 percent Gallops at 21 percent So the gap between Gallop and Cooper not that massive CDLM easily the best overall process play of the three especially because he has the the balance of Downfield work in volume that Amari Cooper doesn't quite have as much of But for me it's gonna go lamb Cooper Gallop But Gallop definitely even though he rates out as a mid-level value, which I know is the question grim fan Still a very worthwhile Play especially if you're playing Dak Prescott at MVP Okay question from Ryan should I start Dallas D or no because of taste and Hill again, that depends on your Your alternatives you can check out the projections on number fire to look at alternatives. I you know taste him Hill He's been charged with some turnover where he plays according to pro football focus this year He was below league average in per drop back passing that expected points last year. He was at a point oh six in his starts The average about a point. I mean this year. It's a point one. Oh last year was a little bit higher But about a point one two it's about half as efficient definitely nothing to worry about defensively, but you might have better options Although, you know with the if you if you play the angle that you know Dallas plays from ahead forces taste and Hill to have to throw we know that that could be do good things So I'm kind of like lukewarm on the Dallas defense for tonight probably do a little bit better, but That's whenever I and defense is I don't really do a whole lot of analysis on myself So that's why I let number fire do the work for me on those Okay, Josh is asking out of the out of these three. I need to Gronk pits knocks need to So I'm gonna Okay, I'll run this through my start simulator, but I doubt it's gonna be Dawson knocks here Between those I love Rob Gronkowski this week He I know he had the production this past week, but he also had just a phenomenal role So I'll see what I'll see what the simulations here have to say So yeah, and I'm leaving it a half PPR because I don't you didn't specify, but that's you know, it's fine With the implied team total even being low for the the Falcons here It's it's kind of hard to make a case for Dawson knocks within that trio Gronkowski again had a phenomenal workload Kyle pits the production hasn't been there, but for Dawson knocks. He's still got a lot of competition for targets So I'm gonna go ahead and play the safe route and go with Rob Gronkowski and Kyle pits out of those Three Kyle on YouTube is asking taste some Hill MVP. Great question Yes and no It comes down to your risk tolerance for MVP plays Very obviously taste some Hill at seven thousand on Fandall rates out as like a slate busting medium-level value for tonight but his Top score odds and this is all based on Number fires projections and then I simulate things out 10,000 times just to see what what's the most likely outcome How frequently certain players lead the slate and Fandall points how frequently are they top five? Tasting those third barely let's call him second I would probably bump this up a hair if I were projecting him I would you know bump up his is half look at his Fandall points by about half a point even one point like 16 and a half 17 here, but either way What we're seeing is that? Dak Prescott is still the best bet to lead the slate in Fandall points, which shouldn't surprise anybody In on Fandall with no, you know, everyone's the same salary regardless of whether you play them at flex or MVP It's hard to go against Dak, especially with those historical optimal lineup numbers Showing that we want when we can and we can the favorite quarterback in games like this, so That's the case against Taysum Hill The case for Taysum Hill is just that he's a rushing quarterback and rushing quarterbacks can bust open any slate again He threw for over 200 yards in his four starts last year Averaged over I don't want to say through for over 400 and like you don't want to apply each of them But you know he Like he has that Konami code Upside shout out to rich rebar on that one But again last year 52.3 rushing yards per game in his starts with almost 10 carries. That's phenomenal I would say that if I were really to project out popularity numbers at MVP Even with Taysum Hill being under salaried. He's not gonna come close to Dak Just because Dak is the favorite. He's got a higher implied team total. He's got a lot of stacking candidates So there's still leverage there most likely with Taysum Hill at almost 20% odds to lead the slate in Fandall points Bigger question is like do you stack him with anybody? Can you play him with Mark Ingram? There's probably a pretty severe negative correlation between he and Ingram Just because Taysum Hill would derive so much of his value from rushing and specifically rushing touchdowns But who do you stack him with like Trey Conn Smith's fine? He would be my number one among their pass catchers between he Callaway And really anyone else. I mean low Jordan Humphrey ran a few random He can get a downfield target or two But it's not really enough unless you're playing the angle that this game is extremely low scoring So the question becomes can you play Taysum Hill by himself? At MVP with four Cowboys. I think that that's very possible to be the optimal lineup I think that it's really intriguing. So it's like yes and no He's probably more likely to be The MVP then he'll be rostered as MVP The question just becomes like is there enough for him to produce if we don't have a viable stack candidate for him So, I mean again, I'm gonna go with that number one Because Everything tells me to but I still love Taysum Hill as the MVP and I have nothing against it there Seth on YouTube is asking should I start Gallup over Judy? I'll run that through the Sims Just because Judy's playing You know, I'll cut off the main slate But the majority of my research at this point in the week is through Thursday night and the main slate on Fandall but Judy, I mean, I want to love Jerry Judy, but the market shares for the Broncos have been like Really really frustrating. We've seen multiple games with as they're getting healthier We've seen multiple games from them where nobody's had more than four targets and that's an issue, right? Now Michael Gallup should be in line for pretty steady volume here, especially against a team that that stifles the run But as expected with pretty Pretty even projections. It's it's about a coin flip here Judy is rating out a little bit more likely to get to 15 Fandall points He's rating out a little bit more likely or a half PPR. So I always call him fail points, but half PPR points So he's like a little more likely that then Michael Gallup. I Kind of don't like such a low implied team total for for the Broncos though. Just 19 points I'm this is a tough one because it's so close But I would lean Jerry Judy if I had to I think that if I was there at the same thing I would be in Judy for myself in my own lineup. So I'm gonna say Judy there Johnny on Facebook is asking not for the game tonight start Jerry Judy or van Jefferson against the Jaguars I think I'm gonna go van. I don't care what these numbers say Van Jefferson was In a fantastic spot last week. He had four of ten downfield targets for the Rams He had nine targets overall Just one shy of Otto Beckham and Cooper cup for a team high Otto Beckham not practicing Wednesday. So he's not probably not a hundred percent But like, okay, so here's the thing This couldn't get any closer In terms of projections and also one of the reasons that Jefferson is projected a little bit lower here But has has the ability to overcome overperform. Sorry Judy in a simulation model is because I come for a dot and his eight I was really high So Judy's but that that kind of explains why this is leaning a little bit toward van But the number that really is is dictating this is the implied team total the touchdown equity for van Jefferson is just substantially higher than it is for Jerry Judy. And I think that's one thing that you can always look at Whenever you have coin flip decisions is whose team is expected to score more. It's very clearly here by eleven point two five points That it's gonna be the Rams So I love van this week and I feel pretty confident in the process behind starting van Jefferson over Jerry Judy Josh's burrows killing me. Yeah, he's had three straight down games I think that there's a good path for him to produce in a in a promising game I can actually just throw him in here and see what his odds are of getting to 20 but You know, the chargers do limit that they're good at defending the down to a pass they still face a pretty decent number of Downfield attempts and and like they're like 20th and a doc something like that. So they're really good at defending those But they've also haven't faced Jamar Chase and Jamar Chase is phenomenal T Higgins phenomenal on down for the targets as well You know, it's a pretty solid projection four out of ten times. He gets the 20 fandal points fantasy points Like I think that he's fine. It just depends on what your options are and again points you back to the start sit calm that I post on a number of fires so that you can compare his performance outcome range compared to other starters Brandon is asking should my co-worker Dustin make Gallup his MVP I Mean honestly I think you could do worse than Michael Gallup at MVP I'm not gonna get there. I can tell it's a bit of a joke, but you know, we still see a like a decent amount of MVP's be wide receivers I think Michael Gallup is very underrated from a talent standpoint and if you're willing to play Michael Gallup at MVP You can build So here's the thing A lot of people are gonna start their lineups like this To some degree and you have 12,167 for your final three plays on Fandall This slate could easily come down to which of the five players you play in your MVP Like you can you can build a really chalky Dak plus Taysum line up or he could differentiate it very easily by plugging in Gallup at MVP put Dak back at flex So I know it's kind of a joke But whenever we're looking at such an obvious slate with so much salary available because Taysum Hill's 7,000 I don't think it's really like that big of a joke to play Michael Gallup at MVP in some lineups if you're playing multiple lineups Adam's asking Chuba and Terry or David Montgomery and Hunter Renfro Definitely not The the Chuba side there just because his role has been pretty bad. They've been relying a bit more on Amir Abdullah I Think that Hunter Renfro is in a great spot long term the volume has been There the downfield targets got three downfield targets in the past three games his adot is Like seven and a half over the past three games, which is still about three yards shy of The receiver average, but he's getting a little bit more downfield work David Montgomery someone actually kind of featured a little bit I'm gonna start to call him. He's playing like 90% of the snaps for the Bears It's a really good role. So for me that one's pretty clearly going with the David Montgomery side DJ's asking will Ingram see any work if Khmer is back so Khmer is out Play foster Maro with Waller out. Yeah, so Mark Ingram is set for a pretty big workload Tonight Khmer has been rolled out. I Know that he's still listed as a game-time decision on Fandle because I don't think it's totally official but Number fires projecting this one without Alvin Khmer with Mark Ingram to play pretty heavy snaps and He is the very like he's the easiest leverage play at MVP if you plug him in You are by default not able to play either quarterback at MVP Again, you can still play Dak and Taysum in your lineup But if you play Mark Ingram at MVP that could be the difference between the same five player lineup winning a tournament in placing tied for like, you know, whatever just because Just because Dak ended up actually being the MVP and I know that sounds like place make a suboptimal decision But those little tweaks really add up in a single game format Did you just asking thoughts and Deandre Carter this weekend also just the heads up Antonio Brown got suspended three games According to Bleach your report Okay, so I won't comment on the Antonio Brown situation, but that's work good for Rob Gronkowski Mike Evans And Chris Godwin for sure Tom Brady is one of my favorite quarterbacks for the main slate Deandre Carter Well, let me see what What we get here Got a whole lot of love from number fire simulations Again, if it's like a start-sit situation for a season long probably do a little bit better I'm not there Even though I like this game Jim's honest and I talked about this game a good bit on the heat check previewing the main slate But I really don't think that it's there I also talked specifically about low salaried receivers and when sort of what context in which they hit their ceilings so I Would say probably no for me with Carter Adam letting is a follow-up Chuba and Terry or Montgomery and Renfrow Chuba and Chuba or Montgomery If you could just so if you could just trade Chuba for Montgomery. I would do that I don't have a whole lot of interest in Chuba Howard and I love David Montgomery if it takes Subbing from Terry to Renfrow. I still think it's worth it. I'm just because Montgomery's role has been so good so sorry if I'm not understanding but I would say Montgomery over Chuba Even if it takes giving up that that drop from Terry McClourin to Hunter Renfrow for The rest of the way Johnny's in yet Khmer is out. So thanks for that But yeah, that's a that's all the questions for tonight I think it's a really fascinating slate because we have taste some hill but it's not gonna take a whole lot of differentiating to Still play taste some hill and be a little bit different you can leave salad on the table because you we would be playing taste some hill at 14,000 anyway, so you could just kind of envision that on the roll still the same the salaries not and that's the easiest way to get different for tonight, so Thank you all for tuning in. Thank you for the questions is always helpful to get some Input here some some things to go over for the Thursday nights late, but of course the season-long angle as well for the weekend So thanks again for tuning in that's gonna be all I have for today's Fandall fantasy Q&A big. Thank you to Joy Affleck for producing the video here Best of luck tonight and best of luck this weekend


Let's do another example. This time we have a rational function. f of x equals x plus one over x. So what are issues we have to do with here? Well, because of the denominator, there could be issues that make this thing undefined. And so if we think about the domain of this thing, the domain is gonna be everything, so that the denominator doesn't go to zero. So basically we have to throw out x equals zero. That's not inside of our domain. Now, I often like to do domain with the discontinuity category together, because problems with the domain often are associated to discontinuities.  The limit has to exist in the limit in the function after a degree. Well, if you're undefined, that's already an indication of a discontinuity. So what's going on there? Well, as we approach x equals zero from the right, if we take the limit here of our function f of x, well, as you approach zero from the right, you're gonna end up with this one over zero plus, which is positive infinity. And as you take the limit as x approaches zero from the left of f of x, you're gonna end up with one over zero minus, which looks like a negative infinity. And so this is indication that we have some type of vertical asymptote at the y-axis. We'll put this on the screen a little bit later. In terms of intercepts, right? Well, because x equals zero is outside the domain of the function, turns out there is no y-intercept, right? The y-intercept does not exist. In terms of x-intercepts, well, if we looked at the equation f of x equals zero, this would imply we look at x plus one over x equals zero. This gives us that x equals negative one over x. Give myself a little bit more space there. Times both sides by x, you get that x squared equals negative one. I'm gonna stop you right there. x squared can't equal negatives. It has to be non-negative. If we were to take the square root, we're getting some imaginary numbers at that point. So this tells us that x-intercepts also do not exist. So this graph has no x-intercepts nor y-intercepts. That might seem like bad news, but this is actually great news because if you have no x-intercepts or y-intercepts, this tells us that we can never touch the x-axis or the y-axis. That's gonna help us draw our picture actually quite well. In terms of symmetry, this graph does actually have some symmetry. I normally don't care about it, but if you look at f of negative x, you end up with negative x minus one over x, which if you factor that out, x plus one over x, that is factor out the negative one, you end up with negative f of x. So this indicates our function's odd. And so if we were graphing it, it should be symmetric with respect to the origin. All right, let's see, in behavior, this one's a good one to know as well. If we take the limit as x goes to infinity of the function x over one over x, well, what's gonna happen? As x goes to infinity, the one over x is just gonna go to zero, it's gonna vanish. And so this thing will just look like the limit as x goes to infinity of x. And as this is a polynomial, it'll just look like infinity. And similar things will happen as we take the left side, take the limit as x goes to negative infinity of x plus one over x. Same thing's happening as before. The one over x will go to zero and this thing will look like the limit as x approaches negative infinity of here x. This will go to a negative infinity. And in fact, this graph has what commonly called an oblique asymptote. This is some diagonal line where our function f of x will be approximately the same thing as x as you go to the extreme. So we're gonna actually add that oblique asymptote to our graph in just a second. Let's look at the derivative first. Actually, now that I've moved down a little bit, I guess we are kind of in the right spot to start graphing this thing. So what did we say earlier we had? So we have this oblique asymptote, which is the diagonal line y equals x. You get something like that. And we get something like that. And then we also had a vertical asymptote at the y-axis. There was no x-intercepts, no y-intercepts, but we do have these asymptotes right here. So we're gonna find some critical numbers by looking at the first derivative, y prime is gonna equal one minus one over x squared. If we set this equal to zero, we end up with one equals one over x squared, which gives us x squared equals one, which gives us x equals plus or minus one. So we get some critical numbers at plus or minus one. Critical numbers we also should be worried about where does the derivative not exist, which there's the same domain issues we had before. If you divide, if x is zero, you're gonna divide by zero. But don't worry about that necessarily because the original function was undefined at zero, the derivative will also be undefined at zero. And that's not a critical number, that's just a discontinuity from before. And so let's add these critical numbers to our graph here. If we take x to equal one, plug one into the original function, you're gonna end up with one plus one over one, which is two. And so we're gonna plot that point there. We're gonna get x is one, y is two. So we get a point right here, one comma two. I wanna figure out what happens at negative one, which we could plug into the function as well, but we can also use symmetry since we know it's odd. We know there's gonna be a point right here at negative one comma negative two. These are our critical numbers. For the second derivative, we take the derivative of this bad boy right here. And so that's gonna give us positive two over x cubed, in which case that actually never equals zero. If you have a fraction equal to zero, it's because the numerator was equal to zero, which here the numerator is two. There are problems at x equals zero, but again, that's a discontinuity. That's not a point of inflection. So what this tells us is that the derivative could change its inflection at zero. So we do care about it.  The first and second derivative are undefined at zero. And so that's gonna come into our sign chart that we're gonna build right over here. So the numbers we wanna care about are negative one, zero, and positive one. And so what does the second derivative do at these locations? Well, looking at the function two over x cubed, two is always positive. x cubed will have the same sign that x does. And so when x is positive, the second derivative will be positive. And when x is negative, the second derivative will be negative there as well. So we have a minimum at negative one. We have a maximum at x equals one. And because you went from a negative to a positive, this indicates a change of inflection, right? When you're less than zero, your graph will be concave down. When you are greater than zero, you're gonna be concave upward. And so putting this all together, let's take our point one, x equals one here, which is gonna be a local minimum. The graph has to approach infinity when you're to the right of zero. And it has to approach this asymptote as well. And so we get this concave up picture right here. It went from decreasing to increasing because it's a local minimum. And then by symmetry, we're gonna get the same type of picture down here. When you do these curve sketches, you often get more information that's actually necessary to draw the entire graph. Those type of redundancies are okay. We like them because it helps us get a better understanding of the graph right here. And so this is our final picture. Let's see how we did the next page. We can look at a computer generated image right here and voila, we have exactly that picture. We see the two little cup shapes. One is concave up right here. The other one's concave down right here. It was increasing then decreasing. It was decreasing then increasing. The oblique asymptote is illustrated. I did not include the vertical asymptote here just because it's the y-axis and so you can't really see it very well if I were to draw it there. So we did pretty good.


Most of this information comes from the tax guide for small business for individuals who use Schedule C, Publication 334 Tax Year 2022. You can find on the IRS website, irs.gov, irs.gov. Looking at the income tax formula, we're focused on line one income. Remember, in the first half of the income tax formula is in essence an income statement, but just an outline of scaffolding other forms and schedules flowing into it. The Schedule C for business income, basically an income statement in and of itself having income minus business expenses. The net income then flowing from the Schedule C to line one income of our income tax formula. This is the first page of the Form 1040, noting that the Schedule C would flow into the Schedule 1, which would flow into line eight of the Form 1040 here. This is the Schedule C profit or loss from business where we can see the income statement format of an income and expenses. Alright, so now we're going to be talking about accounting for your income. Accounting for your income for income tax purposes differs at times from accounting for financial purposes. So note, when we think about the bookkeeping, the general accounting process, what we're trying to do is compile past financial transactions. Financial transaction benefits you today. In such a way that it makes sense for whatever purpose we're using it for, generally that being decision making purposes for us as managers and possibly providing it to external users, investors possibly, to make investment decisions. But here we're compiling basically that same financial information. Balance sheet income statement primarily focused on the income statement here, because it's an income tax in order to do the taxes. So that means that when we think about the accounting methods that we're using, we usually think of an accrual method versus a cached method. And we often think from a bookkeeping standpoint about regulations on businesses that are usually regulating forcing businesses that are large corporations to use most of the time and accrual based method and using generally accepted accounting standards. But small businesses often aren't regulated even in their financial reporting because they're not publicly traded companies.  So now we've got to make sure that we're in compliance. We might have to make some tweaks between what we do on a bookkeeping standpoint to what is done basically on a tax code standpoint. Many small businesses might then just say, hey, I'm just going to do my books on a cash basis, because that way you don't have the adjusting entries to kind of move from a book basis to a cached basis or a tax basis, I should say, because you're primarily doing the books in order to comply with the tax code. Now note that the tax code is not the primary or best way to account for things because the tax code has all kind of rules that aren't designed for optimizing decision-making from a business standpoint. For example, the capitalization rules and the 179 depreciation, early depreciation, special depreciation, those are really distorting the concepts of normal accounting.  So those are decisions that you might want to talk to your accountant about to think about how your bookkeeping would best be done so that your taxes can be as easy as possible and you can also take care of your internal needs for the financial statements and possibly any external needs for those financial statements perhaps for needing to get like a loan or something. Okay, so this section discusses some of the more common differences that may affect business transactions. So figure your business income on the basis of tax year and account and according to your regular method of accounting, which we talked about before, cash method or an accrual method or some kind of modification or combination of those methods. So if the sale of a product is an income producing factor in your business, you usually have to use inventories to clearly show your income. We talked about businesses that have inventory. If you deal with inventory, you're probably having to lean towards an accrual method to some degree because of that inventory. So make sure you're taking that into consideration. How are you going to account for the inventory? So dealers in real estate are not allowed to use inventories. For more information on inventories, you can see chapter 2. Income paid to third party. So all income you earn is taxable to you. You cannot avoid tax by having the income paid to a third party. So we talked about, I believe a little bit of that before when we thought about revenue recognition concepts. So you might say revenue is recognized when I receive the income. But what if I have that revenue collected by somebody else? Well, they're collecting it on your behalf. There's nothing really stopping you from collecting it. So you would think that would still be basically income to you. So example, you rent out your property and the rental agreement directs the leasee to pay the rent to your son. So now I didn't get the income. It went to my son. Well, okay, you know, that's clearly some trying to avoid something here. So the amount paid to your son is gross income to you.