Welcome folks. This is Tom O'Brien of TFNN.  You focus on growth. Hope everyone's having a great day, safe day, and I wish everyone a Merry Christmas, a Hanukkah, whatever you're celebrating out there folks. Have a great time, man. Be impeccable with your word. Release the need to be right. When you believe something, you assume you're right. You may even destroy relationships in order to defend your position. Let go of the need to defend your position. Make it wise. Let's take a look at it out here. We have the Dow down 17. Nasdaq off 61. S&P's off 4.5. Gold contract up $13.70. Traded $1,808. You get silver up 32 cents. $23.95. Light suede crude up $2.5. $79.98. A barrel notes and bonds. A 10-year note. Down 9 ticks. Straight into the price point of $1,1308. The 30-year off 27 ticks at $1,2719. We get the 10-year right now, folks. Yielding $3.715. And $Kingdollar. $Kingdollar's down 92 ticks. Traded $104,338. Year is at $106. The year is at $132.85. And the British pound is at $120 to $1. iPhone numbers<PHONE_NUMBER>. Give us a call, folks. One note's going on in your world. The world of the S&P's, let's take a look at them. Well, what we have is this. We have an ABC structure down. You have a monthly in the S&P down. You have a monthly and the queues down. And now we have a daily in both of them also. So the bottom line is that you can expect lower prices coming at you in the next few weeks, folks. Bottom line, you broke the B points yesterday. You broke them with volume. And, you know, on the spy, the bottom line is that your projection is just about almost at that low. It's a little above the low. Right now the low is $348. Right now you're $380. Inside of the NDX100, it's a whole different animal. The queues, the projection of the queues, is $10 lower than the October low. So I expect what you're going to see here. We're going to blow away this October low. October low is $254. And your projection is $244. So you're talking about some big numbers here. We go to the gold contract. We take a look at the gold contract. What happened out here yesterday? Gold came down, had volume. This is the worst thing that gold could actually do today. Because the bottom line is that now what you're going to have, take a look at this. There we go. So what you're going to have here now is that yesterday we came down with 176,000 contracts. You're doing $76,000 now. So you're going to be up at $100,000 or something like this. Bottom line, that's not what you're looking for here inside the metals market. We're going to take a look at King Dollar. And you're going to see just the opposite. King Dollar is a rejected lower price out here once again. It doesn't have any juice, but the bottom line is that you're rejected lower price. We got to $104,000, $124,000 today. A couple hundred ticks off of it, but the bottom line is that it doesn't want lower price. That's how this baby is setting up right now. We're going to take a look at some of the higher volume equities out here. Today is going to be a really light volume day, folks. You got Tesla, that's just not stopping. They're going to write books about this one, man. Tesla's down $2.00. You got Apple down $158. You got Amazon Flat. Nvidia's down $260. Nvidia was down $12.00 yesterday, too. So the volatility is wild out here. You got, let's go inside the Dow Industries and take a look at the strength versus the weakness inside the Dow. So inside the Dow Industries, what we have happening out here. Point-wise is that you have Chevron putting 29 positive points. Travel is 12, Honeywell, 8. Take it away from it. You got 3M minus 16. Nothing heavy out here. Minus 16, Apple minus 10, Microsoft minus 10. Inside the NBX100. What do we have? Inside the NBX, you get charter communications up 2%. PayPal's up, no, the paychecks. That's good. Up 1.8%. I'm going to pull that back. Take it away from it. Moderna's down 4.3%. Is that Rivian? Yeah, Rivian's down 3.8%. Lucid's down 3.8%. So let's go. I'm going to go to paychecks there. Take a look at this. Because this is where, you know, we brought up Sintas. Sintas chart was at highs. So my point is that looking for the aspect of, you know, are we going into recession or not? So we take a look at paychecks. We have a paychecks. Yeah, this is just a bonus. Okay. So paychecks came down hard. Yeah, this came down hard. Let me pull this back. Put this on a weekly. Okay. So I see what happens here. So this is going to the bottom of its consolidation that brings you all the way back to 2021. Yeah. This is, you're coming down with volume. The last, okay, let me just see. It's 105.69. It was 3.4 million. We've done 3.9. And that's on the weekly. So you're coming down into that swing with volume. It's building cause to break it. So we'll see how this shakes out. This one's, you know, it's important to basically keep your eyes on a paychecks, on a Sintax. The reason being is that if we're going to come into a, you know, full blown recession, what you're going to see is that those equities are going to be lower. That's the bottom line, you know, because you're going to have less people on payrolls. You're going to have less people paying for the service versus maybe they start pulling back on expenses. They'll start doing it themselves. Most times what it is, it's not that part of it. Most times what it is, is that the aspect that you don't have enough new companies that are coming on board. That's what it really comes down to. Let's go take a look at a few of these gold equities. So we'll take a look at an eco-eagle first. We got an eco-eagle. So get a sideways move. Now this is going to be subtle. It's going to be interesting to see how this shakes out because yesterday it came down slightly, just with 2.3 million. They're doing 545,000 going higher today. If we go take a look at, let's go take a look at Barrick because what Barrick did do, what Barrick looked like, you know, it had real juice when, and it did when it came into this last swing. Now what's going to happen, okay, the swing I'm talking about is this. So we had volume with Barrick at 1764. It did 28 million. Then we tested it with 20. We came down yesterday with 16 and, you know, it's going up today with four. It's not a bad, it's, we'll see. What you don't want to do if you own Barrick, you don't, you do not want to see this test this high up here. You know, if it laid right here, it'd be pretty good. You know, because when you're going sideways, if you can lay at the top of the range, even when you're going sideways, the longer that you lay at that top, the more probabilities that you're going to basically break through that top. You know, in this particular case that's probably, I would say that the equities I look at in the gold market, that has the best indication that it may break topside. The rest of them, I'm still that we're going downtown. I'm still in the context that this dollar is basically going to basically run higher. Dow, Dow Industries right now, 49 Nasdaqs down 35. SAPs are up three. Stay right there folks. Come right back.


Hi, welcome to Sunday Morning Coffee, the first podcast of June 2023. Welcome to Pride Month. We are halfway through our year. Can you imagine? So, let's pause for a moment and think about where are you going to be this time next year? Huh? Huh? How about it? Can you even look back and for a moment, let's reflect on how far we've come to get to this place, this point in time. Where were you this time last year? June 2022, what was that like for you? What was your world like? What were you stressing about at that time? What were you working on? What did your family look like? What were your relationships like? What did you like to do? Like, what was your big thing that you were doing a lot of, you know, how we get on kicks where we like, love to go running for a short amount of time, or we change our diet and we try some new cool coffee drink or something like that. What was that like? Let's take a moment and reflect. Can you even remember? Just think back to when the weather was warm. That might be a clue. When school ended for the kids. What were you doing? What were you thinking about? Where was your life? This might be a good time to pause this audio and actually to journal, journal about it. I'm going to make mention that you might hear the wind in this audio because I am outside and I'm near the lake actually on a nice long walk today. I'm sitting at a bench right now under a picnic shelter and just really appreciating the water. You might actually hear the noise of the dam also in the background. So we've got the water element and the air element flowing and blowing and moving, helping to create some change and recognition of how far you've come since this time last year. Who are you today, huh? Who are you this June 2023? I have been spending some time journaling about this. And today I'd like to talk to you about healthy boundaries and comes, it comes from a place of contemplation where I can actually considered, I know I can create healthy boundaries like for my body, like what I put into my body, what I eat, how I spend my day, like, you know, schedule focus, that kind of thing. I mean, organizational wise, I know that I can create healthy boundaries for that. I know I can create healthy boundaries around in relationships and such. But what about in my thoughts? Okay, think about it. Think about thought boundaries. Do you, do you think that's possible? So I wrote this question down. Can I maybe make some healthy boundaries around my thoughts? And the answer was a resounding yes. My intuition screamed, yes, yes, absolutely. So what would this look like? This does not look like trying to control, but it looks like a system of awareness, awareness that creates recognition. And when there's recognition, then we can respond in a way that is enlightened, that is conscious. So when you have awareness, there's recognition, and then we can respond. But between the recognition and the response, there is a moment of pause. We have the power in those moments to allow ourselves to step back, to reflect, to take in and to make a decision upon how we are going to respond. Or instead of reacting, let's make a choice, a conscious choice to respond. This is where the power is. So the awareness creates the recognition. And then comes the response, but the response does not have to be automatic or autopilot. Again, awareness, recognition, pause for the response. And in that state of pause in between the recognition and the response, you have choice. That's where the power is. And we've said this before, but with our thoughts, it doesn't always seem that way because it's so patterned, it's so regimented. Things are so ingrained within us that we get triggered. And instantly, this flood of information sensory comes through the body and then triggers some thoughts, some phrases even, which really are not your own voice. They are other peoples that you have taken in as your own.  This makes sense. This is about how we're reared, how we're raised, how we have the earlier experiences in our childhoods. This is based upon our different cultures, the neighborhoods we grew up in, the families we're around, the type of family that we have, the way we are perceived and receive information in our classrooms and in our organizations that we belong to our clubs, whether it be Girl Scouts or your church or archery team or whatever. Whatever it might look like for you, there is so much, so much information that creates this rhythmic pattern of thought that comes from some very core solid values and belief systems about ourselves that we get from other people. We don't have access early on in our baby brains to be able to create values or belief systems that are our own independent ones that just are sourced from inside of us at the purest center of ourselves, our soul. And that's why you notice that children are so beautiful and truthful and honest and just express their feelings and emotions freely until they're learned not to. They're learned. They're learned, right? In lots of different ways, but they are schooled on how not to. And because of that, in a sense, the spirit is broken apart from the mind. And so this is where that disconnection or that feeling of separation comes in and where we really truly have a desire for wholeness or reconnection. And so what I'm suggesting is that by creating this opportunity for boundaries, that's how we can come to terms with not just not rejecting everything we've learned about ourselves through others, not at all, because that's information, right? Not to accept that as one piece of the multifaceted circles that create who we are, right? And so because of that, when we are in that awareness, then we have that recognition. We have a space, a pause, a moment to step into this powerful place of this pause and then determine how we are going to respond. And the response comes through the thought before it creates the action. So when we have awareness of a thought that doesn't fit the pattern, it feels uncomfortable. It feels triggering. It feels not like us. It feels invoking and infuriating or embarrassing or harsh. It is triggering other experiences that have already occurred from the past and bringing them forward to create fear and to create blocks and to create barriers to keep us small and to not allow you to be free in the thought. Because the idea is, is if your mind is so free and flowing, that means you're not going to focus. You're not going to be a productive member of society. You're going to be dingy or air-headed or flighty and not respected. Again, another energy, energetic of value system that has been created early, early on that we've all gotten into. Now if this is nobody's fault, but it is your problem, because blame and looking backwards doesn't help. So what we do is we focus on the present moment and we create a healthy boundary about the thoughts. So right now what you could do is you could create the intention or a mantra that will help you to practice that pause in between the recognition stage and the response stage. It might be a deep in breath and a big exhale. It might be physically stepping back in a moment.  Having simple sensory or somatic could really help you create a boundary, a healthy boundary, which is that pause, that space in between, then you can make a choice about how you truly feel and what you actually believe instead of automatic, auto-response, repeating a cycle that really is not helping you. Is it? Is it? So I'm going to do this for myself. I think what I'm going to do is I'm going to first, when I come into awareness of a thought that doesn't feel good, I'm going to recognize that. And then I think what I'm going to do is I'm going to focus on just breathing out. There's actually this, there's this method, there's a really simple thing to help relax your anxiety when you get anxious.  And it instantly just breaks that energetic hold. And I don't know how it works or why it works, but it works. It's a somatic thing and it works to interrupt, disrupt the pattern. So often we get distracted. We use things like vices to numb ourselves, right? So let's consciously embrace the idea of boundary that creates a healthy energy around us through the choices of our thoughts. And then we can create a new thought. How would I like, what would I like to think? And sometimes just pick a word, you don't have to formulate a whole thought, pick a word, how I would like to feel instead of this feeling. What is the opposite of that feeling? Or what I really believe to be true for me. What is true for you? What is true for you? Another tool I suggest to my coaching clients, ask yourselves, what is true for you right now? What is true right now? Because the energy of the rush of the flood of the emotion, the embarrassment, the whatever you are feeling, that fight or flight, freeze, fawn energy, jettic, that is being triggered right there, is not what you, it's true for you today. That is something from the past. It is not here today. That threat is not here right now. It is something, there is something there that's different than that. In this moment it is not here. It is not alive. It's not here. It's not now. It's a trauma response, right? Okay, so this is kind of deep. I didn't expect it to be so deep, but it is what it is. I hope that this Sunday morning coffee podcast episode got you thinking here on Above Life Channel YouTube. I know I do these on Sunday and often I will try to do them live streams too, so keep an eye for that. Check out the playlist if you want to get inspiration on lots of other intuitive and real life topics because I believe that spirituality, spirit, intuition has got to be applicable. It needs to be realistic and make sense for us, or we're not going to be able to embrace those aspects of energy that are intangible that really can help us out and resource us. But it's got to make sense. It's got to be practical. I hope I've inspired your spirit today and filled you with hope and encouraged you to live your life as always. It's your life after all, and you get to live it. Just live it. Thanks for being here.


Hey everybody, what's going on? I am Greg Sussman and welcome to the 2020 mock draft for Fantasy Baseball and joining me to give us his top six picks in the draft. It's my good buddy making his return to the hurry up. It's Frank Stample, hey Frank. Hey, what's going on, Greg? Excited to be here. Fantasy Baseball draft season is upon us. Greg, we're reunited and it feels so good. I wish we could do more shows together, man. Me too, buddy, me too. Hopefully in due time. Let's begin with our top six or your top six. We begin at number one of the first time in seemingly a decade. It is not Mike Trout. It's a man that you drafted last year. Ronald Acuna, your number one overall pick. How come? I know you're thinking, Frank, are you crazy? We've tried this before. We tried to take Mookie Betts over Mike Trout. We tried to take Jose Altuve a couple of years ago over Mike Trout. It hasn't worked out. This time, I think it's going to be different. Ronald Acuna is just a different beast and if you play in a Roto League, a five by five league or a categories league, the stolen bases that Ronald Acuna is going to give you are just much more valuable than Mike Trout. Trout speed has been trending down. Ronald Acuna last year at the age of 21 went 41 home runs and 37 stolen bases is already on record saying he's trying to go 50-50 this upcoming season in 2020. I don't know if that's going to happen. Maybe we can get 40-40 out of him, which would be insane. But this is the type of upside that Ronald Acuna has. He was third in baseball last season with 127 runs scored. He improved his line drive rate. He's improving seemingly as a hitter every single year. And you look at his first two seasons, he's had a 280-plus batting average in each of those. He has a slight tick down in strikeout percentage away from being a 300-hitter. That's the one advantage that a Mike Trout or a Yellowitch is going to have over Acuna is that they're going to hit for better batting average because Acuna strikes out a little bit more than those guys. If he lowers the strikeout rate a little bit, his quality of contact is among the best in the league, then we can see him approach or even exceed a 300 batting average with 35-plus home runs, 35 stolen bases, in a ridiculous lineup that features Freddie Freeman, Ozzy Albees, and Marcelo Zuna. I understand Mike Trout is or was the king. Ronald Acuna this upcoming season is my first overall pick. Ronald Acuna gets in there. He's blamed of power and speed. Well, it's simply not mashed at this point. It's still just so young. He had a good lineup with the Atlanta Braves. Acuna, our number one pick. But who's number two, Frank? Well, you go back to the well. It's Mike Trout. Trout over Christian Yellowitch, how come? I just think Trout has done it for longer, obviously, than Christian Yellowitch. And on a per game basis, Mike Trout is still the best player in baseball. There's no doubt about that. The only knock on him is that he does miss time. He has averaged 32 missed games per season over the last three years. That's why I do drop him down to this number two spot behind Ronald Acuna. But if he manages to stay healthy for 140, 150-plus, then he has the upside to once again finish as the number one player. I mean, what else do you need to say about Mike Trout? The guy has had an OPS over 1,000 for three straight seasons. That is just unheard of in baseball. Last year put up a career high 45 home runs thanks to a career high 49% fly ball rate. So we're seeing a slight tick up in launch angle for Mike Trout. And let's look at this Los Angeles Angels lineup. They added Anthony Rendon. I mean, how much better can they possibly get? We know early on in the season, Shohei Otani is only going to be featured as a hitter. So he's going to slot into that lineup every single day until about mid-May when they use him as a pitcher. So the lineup is improved for the Los Angeles Angels which only means good things to come for Mike Trout. He's one of the true five category players in baseball. Going to hit for an average over 300. Going to give you home runs, runs, RBIs. The stolen bases have been trending down a little bit, but it wouldn't surprise me if he bounces back to 15, maybe 20 steals. Because of that, once again, he's your number two player should be taken inside the top three picks. Let's see if Trout can stay healthy this season and bring back the steals that went away last year during an injury at Murray campaign. We know what Trout can do. We've seen it year after year after year. He's still this good. He's one of the best players, the best player, I should say, in the game overall. The second best fantasy player this season. Which brings us to player number three and that is Christian Yelich. Obviously, you could probably make a case for any of these three guys to go at number one, but you've ranked in Okunya, followed by Mike Trout, followed by Christian Yelich. Who's on pace to do absurd things last year before breaking his kneecap. Is the 100% ready to go, Frank? All the reports that we've seen thus far, Greg, is that Christian Yelich is 100% healthy. And if that's the case, you can also make the argument that he should be the number one player here. If you thought his MVP season was a fluke in 2018, you were mistaken. He followed that up in 2019 last year with 33 home runs. 30 stolen bases, a career high for him in only 130 games. I really like that he started running more last year and he was really successful on the base patch. He went 30 for 32 on the base patch. Assuming that he is healthy, he should be up and running once again. His quality of contact is among the best in the league. Doesn't strike out all that much. And he was one of these players that we spoke about for years that if he would just raise his launch angle a little bit, start hitting more fly balls, start hitting more line drives. Earlier on with the Miami Marlins in his career, he had a lot of ground balls. The past couple of years, he has started hitting more fly balls. He has started hitting more line drives. And that's why you see him putting up these ridiculous seasons well over 300 batting average, well over 30 home runs, and he's starting to run more as well. Great ballpark to hit in. Maybe the best ballpark outside of Yankee Stadium to hit in in terms of left-handed power is Miller Park. Really good lineup there as well. The only pause that you have when it comes to Christian Yelich, which kind of separates himself, that's why I have him third, is that he did fracture his kneecap last year. So, assuming he is healthy, he should go inside the top three picks. And I think you can make the case that he should be the number one overall player again. It's just he's coming off a major injury and Mike Trout and Ronald Lacuna are not. It's hard to separate these three players to look at minuscule things. And I'm not sure the injuries are minuscule type of thing, but Trout's coming in healthy. Ronald Lacuna has been healthy. Christian Yelich gets a merit for that, but since coming to Milwaukee, he's been otherworldly just like Acuna and Trout. You gotta feel good if you get a number three overall pick. I feel like in a Kentucky Derby style, I might take number three overall because that's how confident I am in whoever falls to me. I like Christian Yelich at three. Number four is probably where it gets interesting, Frank, because I think you can make the case for pitchers, a couple of hitters, and I'm not sure which direction is right. For you, it's going to a pitcher, but the interesting thing is which pitcher it is. Yeah, I'm going with Jacob DeGrom over Garrett Cole here, Greg. And I understand Garrett Cole was ridiculous last year, put up over 300 strikeouts. Jacob DeGrom has been the most valuable starting pitcher over the last three years, while Garrett Cole has been elite for the past two seasons with the Houston Astros. Jacob DeGrom has done it for longer, and he's not changing teams. He remains in city field with the New York Mets, and I mentioned over the last three seasons what he's done just to give you an idea. A two, five, three ERA, over 11Ks per nine, a 45% ground ball rate, a 0.97 whip, 763 strikeouts over the last three seasons for Jacob DeGrom. That is the fourth most, 622 in a third innings pitch. That is the second most. So he's going to give you volume. He's been safe in terms of not getting hurt. Knock on wood when it comes to Jacob DeGrom. The only thing that we need to ask for is run support. Mets, can you hit the ball a little bit and get Jacob DeGrom some wins? This guy is a back-to-back Siung Award winner in the National League, and he's doing that with less than 15 wins consistently. That's the only knock on Jacob DeGrom, but he's going to give you a strong ERA, going to give you a strong whip, going to give you over 200 innings pitch, over 200 strikeouts, and of course, if the run support can be better, then we'll get more wins out of Jacob DeGrom. Wins are just such a hard stat to predict. Same thing like touchdowns when it comes to fantasy football. It's very hard to predict wins in fantasy baseball for pitchers, but give me Jacob DeGrom over Garakul. He's done it for longer. He's not changing where he's been, and the reason why I take a picture here, Greg, is because in the second round and the third round, you can get really good hitters. Here's that have been going in the first round in years past. Give me one of those aces at pick four or five. Here at pick four, we'll go Jacob DeGrom. A lot of good pitchers coming in around those spots too, Frank, just so you know. But Jacob DeGrom has shown the consistency with the Mets with the Siung Awards, and he's been a major force in fantasy baseball. I talked about that consistency with the Mets, and it's been the same way in fantasy baseball as well. Garakul burst onto the scene last year as the top pitcher. We'll see if he can do it again in pinstripes. Let's talk more now about Garakul in New York and the difference between him thriving in Houston and trying to make a go of it in a much smaller ballpark in New York. Yeah, I'm not really worried about the ballpark again. If Garakul can just do what he's done with the Houston Atros, he's going to be ridiculous. I mentioned that I do have DeGrom ahead of Garakul just because he's done it for one year longer than Garakul in terms of being elite, one of those top five pitchers in baseball. And the fact that Garakul is changing scenery here, again, I don't really worry about the ballpark because Garakul induces so many swings and misses, so many strikeouts. Again, I'll put it in perspective. What Garakul has done over the past two seasons, a 2.68 ERA, a K per 9 over 13, that is the best among starting pitchers, a 38% ground ball rate, K minus walk percentage, 30%, that is second best in baseball during that span, a 0.96 whip. Whatever you want out of Garakul, he's going to do it, 602 strikeouts over the past two seasons. That is the most in baseball. I mentioned over 300 strikeouts last year. He led baseball in strikeouts, swinging strike rate, nearly 17% that led all qualified starting pitchers. And if you play in a quality start league, he had 26 quality starts that was tied for the most in baseball last year. We know that he's filthy. He's got all the stuff in the world. The only difference for me between him and DeGrom, again, is that he is changing scenery. But outside of that, I still think he's one of the best pitchers in baseball. And you can get hitters that are really good in that second round range, Greg. I know you get some pitchers there and you can make the argument for them, but I think Garakul is just so safe. You can get a hitter in the second round like a JD Martinez, like a Bryce Harper, guys that we've seen do it before, that frankly, in most years, would be going in the first round. You could pair one of those hitters with a Garakul or Jacob DeGrom. Give me that every single day of the week. That is why Garakul should be the fifth player off the board, Greg. All right, Garakul, your number five player overall, and there's a clear distance between DeGrom and Kohl and everybody else, Justin Birdland or Max Scherzer included. Getting him here at number five puts you in a really nice position going forward in your drafts. Frankie likes DeGrom, then Kohl. And finally, we get to your sixth player off the board. It's one we disagree with. I'm going with Mookie Betts. You've decided to go incorrectly with his teammate, Cody Bellinger. Why are you being so silly? Well, Greg, maybe I should just throw this segment back to you and you could tell us why Mookie Betts should be the sixth player off the board. Is that how you want to do this? Our fans can just watch the Fantasy BFFs on a daily basis and they can see that. Oh, right. Well, I'll just go with Cody Bellinger here with the sixth overall pick. You can make the argument for Mookie Betts, but he is changing leads and coming over to a new team. A very good team, by the way, in the Los Angeles Dodgers, so I get that. And we're splitting hairs between Cody Bellinger and Mookie Betts. I like both of these players a lot and they are both two of the top five most contributing players across the board in terms of five category players. Someone who can give you batting average, home runs, runs, RBIs, and stolen bases as well.  Also chipped in 15 stolen bases. If you look at this guy's stat cast page over at Baseball Savant, it is a sea of red and that's a good thing. I mean, he makes the best quality of contact in all of Baseball. He hits the ball extremely hard. He lifts the ball, which is going to obviously result in a ton of home runs. Look at the lineup. It might be the deepest lineup in all of Baseball. Again, Mookie Betts leading off for this team. Max Muncie, Jock Peterson, Cody Bellinger. I haven't even mentioned Corey Seeger, who was once regarded as one of the top prospects in all of Baseball. I think you can make the argument for either one of Mookie Betts or Cody Bellinger. Cody Bellinger is not changing teams. I feel a little bit more safe with him. I'm going to take Cody Bellinger. He also has a multi-position eligibility. He could play first base, could play outfield. So that'll help you in a roto league where you need five outfielders as well. Cody Bellinger over Mookie Betts for me. Greg, I'm taking him six overall. It's Mookie Betts for me as you know, but we'll save that for another time where like I said, check out the BFFs on sports grid. But Cody Bellinger obviously had an unbelievable season.  As Frank mentioned, you can't go wrong with either Dodger. These are draft Mookie Betts. That's going to do it for us here on the FanDuel Hurry Up Frank. I appreciate you hanging out and good luck this season. Good luck to you as well, Greg. I know that we have a few teams that we'll be sharing together. We'll be drafting and auctioning together. So that will be a lot of fun. Good luck to everybody else out there. If you have a question regarding the back end of the first round or anything else related fantasy baseball wise, hit me up on Twitter at roto underscore Frank. And advertise yourself. That's what you do. I want to thank everybody for watching. Good luck in your drafts. We'll have more MLB content all month long. Have a fantastic weekend. And we'll see you next time. Right here on the FanDuel Hurry Up.


Hi, I'm David Cantor with the Law Offices of David Michael Cantor and today I'm going to talk about the Goodyear City Court or Municipal Court. If you've been cited and told to go to a Justice Court that's a different jurisdiction altogether or if you're cited with a felony you're going to go to Superior Court, but if you're pulled over by a Goodyear police officer most likely you'll be in the Goodyear City or Municipal Court. Now the address of this court is 1-4455 West Van Buren Street, Suite B-101, that's in Goodyear, Arizona 85338. Now basically if you're going from Phoenix to this court you're going to go down the I-10 until you hit Litchfield Road. Then you're going to make a left and go south and you're going to go all the way to Van Buren and once you hit Van Buren you're going to make a left and go another mile back and then at 145th Avenue you're going to make another left and basically it's at 144th Avenue and Van Buren Road on the south side of the road, so it's pretty easy to find. Now when you show up the parking will be plentiful, so you don't have to worry about that. Make sure you're dressed appropriately. No hats, no sunglasses, t-shirts or shorts, dresses if you're going to a job interview. Now why should you use an attorney? Well, first of all in this particular court if you hire us we go for you so you don't have to go. So an average case lasts four to six months with a court date every month. We would go each month for you so you don't miss work or you don't miss school. In addition if you go by yourself you're going to be what's known as a pro-per. If you're pro-per, you're just going to have to sit and wait to see the prosecutor or the judge in alphabetical order and you can be there all day long. Whereas if you have a lawyer we get preferential treatment and we get to go before the pro-per's and see the judge or the prosecutor. In addition the prosecutor will tell you if you're unrepresented they're going to say you don't have a very good case you should just plead guilty. They're not going to say you have an excellent case. You should fight me at trial, set it to trial. I think you're going to beat me. I think you got a great case. That's just not what they do. They're looking for conviction. Now if you decide you may want to hire us go to our website at dmcantor.com Click on the contact us portion and you can fill out a contact form and you can email it to us or you can simply call us and we'll set you for a free 30-minute initial consultation. It won't cost you any money, but it'll take 30 minutes of your time. In addition if you're unsure you can go to our wins section on our website click it. You're going to see we have over 2,000 wins on all sorts of types of cases. In addition you can click specifically to the Goodyear City Court page and you're going to see some of the wins we've had in the Goodyear City Court. Maybe that'll help you come to a decision, but hopefully if you have been cited in that court you'll give us a call. I look forward to seeing you soon.


Hi and welcome to the session. I am Kanika and I am going to help you to solve the polyquestion. The question says a villager Idwari has a plot of land of the shape of a quadrilateral. The grandma child of the villager decided to take over some portion of his plot from one of the corners to construct a hill center. Idwari agrees to the above proposal with the condition that he should be given equal amount of land in lieu of his land adjoining his plot to form a triangular plot. Explain how this proposal will be implemented. Let's now begin with the solution. Let ABCD be a plot of land in the form of a quadrilateral. Now read the second statement of the question. It says that the grandma child of the villager decided to take over some portion of his plot from one of the corners to construct a hill center. So suppose A is the corner of the plot from where the grandma child has taken land for constructing a hill center. So this is the land which grandma child has taken for constructing a hill center. So through B we have drawn a line BG parallel to AC and then we have joined AE. Question, it agrees to the above proposal with the condition that he should be given equal amount of land in lieu of his land adjoining his plot so as to form a triangle. In place of this equation as equation number one, we will add area of triangle sides of equation one equals to area of plus area of triangle ADC plus triangle ADC is equal to quadrilateral ABCD. So the BAC plus area of triangle ADC is equal to ADE. So area understood the solution well.


Felly i chi'n gwneud i'r wneud ag y bydd y byddwn a'i'r tynnu addysg o dda'n amser i chi'n gwinio. First thing morning, dwi'n arglwunol i'r ffordd bod Diogel eich phoes a'n ffordd a'r dysgu'r ddymarfod hynny. Dwi'n amser yma eich ynser am gyfan, ond y pethau yn eich ganhau ymddangos dyma, mae ydych chi'n olygu'n cymdeithas i ond ar ddiogel when it comes to running cloud native databases, which is a good thing, freedom of choice and all of that good stuff. But it's also an overwhelming freedom of choice as well. So what we want to do here is talk about some of the good, the bad and the unknowns about how that journey is gone to get to where we are today in regards to what options we have. First of all, I'm Michael Cade. I work for a company called Veeam Software. We focus on protecting workloads. Felly, rydyn ni'n ffocws yn amser bydd, rydyn ni'n gyfnwys ar y strobodd. A rydyn ni'n rhaid i'r cyf Lovelyll Cymru, rydyn ni'n ffordd gyntaf cymunedau ddechreuol yma. Mae'r cyfloteid, mae'r cyfloteid i gydfod meddwl y ddiwyddiad cymunedau, a'r cyfloteid cael ei bod yna ysgwrthod o'r cyfloteid. Rydyn ni'n gweithio'n gweld arall, bo booddan wedi gweld iawn i gwybodd iddi sut wedyn ni'n arfer ochr llai ar ôl. Ond yna'n fyddi'r gwneudio dda i'r clywed gyda gandangodaf ar gyfer gweithio. Gwed hyn, gawn am hyn, bydd y cymrydau ymgyllud Argyrchedeg Phaercaf, bydd yoedd yn erioed yn cael ei gweithio, a dwi'n dechrau ychydig symud ymlaen y gwirgyffordeb yw gyda'u gwirgyffordd ymddans. Wel mae'r ymgylchedeg ym amser yn andeithol... ...od ymgylchedeg a hynny'n gweithio eu gwirgyffordd ac mae hynny ymryd ailwydel. a cyfnodol y cyfnodol. Rwy'n credu bod efallai ymarfer o'r cyfnodol a'r cyfnodol yn bach ar gyfer y bydd y cyfnodol, ac rwy'n gwybod yma'r cyfnodol rwy'n gweithio i'r cyfnodol o'r cyfnodol yn bach y bydd y cyfnodol i ddweud o ffasol. Rwy'n gweithio i ddweud o gweithio. Mae'n gweithio i'r gweithio i ddweud o'r gweithio yw'r cyfnwys, yw'r cyfnwys, yw'r ddechrau'r cyfnwys ac mae'r ffordd yn ymdweud yn ymdweud y CSI yn y ddefacto'r ffyrdd o'r ddechrau'r cyfnwys i'r cyfnwys. Felly, rydyn ni'n gweithio'r cyfnwys ac yn gweithio'r cyfnwys o'r gwerthoedd.  Mae'n fawr oes, ac yn ddweud. Rydyn ni'n gŵr ar gweithio'r llai'r uwch. Rydyn ni'n fawr i chi'n meddwl mewn y social media, ydy Michael Cade o'r Michael Cade 1? Rydyn ni'n rhoi gwneud weithio. Rydyn ni'n rhoi gyd yn y Llair. Rydyn ni'n rhoi gwneud weithio cerddur o'r cyffredinol, rydyn ni'n rhoi ei wneud rydyn ni'n rhoi. Felly, y three things that I kind of want to cover throughout the rest of the 20 minutes that I've got because of the two minutes extra that I just stole to introduce myself, why run databases in cloud native? That's going to go into a little bit of the misconceptions that we have as well around running databases in and around Kubernetes. Actually, what options do we have when it comes to running databases on Kubernetes? And then how? How are we going to run those databases? Rydyn ni'n wneud yn gallu ei bod ar y holl y ddysgu ddysgu a yna dwi wedi'i gael. Mae'n gweithio ddweud yw'r Matty a'r Cat yn gweithio'r sefydliad at unrhyw rym ni'n gweithio ar y flynedd y lŽedol, Rym ni'n gweithio ar Afon, Cat, ddeli M C a gweithio ar y holl o'r ddysgu'r ddysgu. Mae'n gweithio'r gweithio ar hwn o'r ddysgu a ddysgu'r bydd o'r ddysgu. Mae'n gweithio ond mae'n gweithio, felly mae'n gweithio'n gweithio. a ydy, rwyf i fynd, yn 20 min, ond yn eich bwysig ar bod yn dimension o drefnod hyn ar hyn yn anodol. Rwy'n credu symud y rahyd i ddim yn chi. Prydych chi'n fod yw'r dweud yn gwybodaeth gwahanol? Y dweud yn gwybodaeth gwahanol yw'r dweud yn gwybodaeth gwahanol fel y ddweud yn ceisio'n llalu ffordd o gwybodaeth gwahanol a yr cyff cuentaun gwahanol. Felly mae arbennig yma, ac yma'r wahanol ar hynny, o wybod yma'r hefyd, Rydyn ni wedi cofnod o'ch cyfwyd sifynyddol â'r lefyn yn cael sceic, amla gennych ti wneud am'r ddeithas cyfreidol, a'r ddeithas cyfreidol yn y ddefnyddiaeth ym gyfwyd a chi'n rhaid i'r gweithio. A fe gweithio, yn cael sy'n wneud am arfer am rhaid i'r ddeithas cyfreidol, pan o'r ddydd y dyf ankles eich ddeithas yno,り cyfo'r sceicol, a yn pewod ddeithas cyfreidol, yr amser yn cael ei ddefnyddio erbyn. oeddwn i ddim yn ymddangos. Ond bydd ydy'r ddechrau'r mynd o hollaf. Fydd ydych chi'n cael ei ddechrau y dyfodol y drech i gyfathu'r sgwpeth ac yw'r ddechrau i ddechrau ar hyn. Rydyn ni'n fyddai bod ydych yn ysgrifennu ac mae'r ddweud yn anhygrifan o'r ddatr o'r dyfodol, a mae'n ddysgu'r ddau o'r ddau a'r sgwpeth o'r ddau, rydyn ni'n credu rydyn ni'n credu i gyd y ddysgu'r ddau wedi gweld, ond y cyfnodd yma, ond fy ystyried ymhygau yn yma'r adroddau statiliau. Felly, y gweithredu byddaeth, fel y dyfodol, yn ymhwytof sydd wedi'i sefydlu'r adroddau cyfnodd, sy'n gyffredinol y cyfnodd hynny yn mwyafol iddynt i'r adroddau cyfnodd. Mae'r adroddau a'r adroddau yn ymwneud i'r adroddau sy'n ôl yn ei ddefnyddio. Now that we have CSI, the Container Storage Interface, it enables us to run those databases, those data services alongside or inside of our Kubernetes cluster. So we have first class storage support and we have lots of different storage vendors that are able to out of band create capabilities within your Kubernetes cluster. So if we want to dive down a little bit what's different between a traditional database, so a database that we maybe run in a virtual machine or on a physical server to what a cloud native database actually looks like is around traditional, they kind of fix things around scalability and security and accessibility that should put asterisks around some of these as well. But from a cloud native point of view we're considering around the design phase of that. What does that look like in terms of being able to leverage those cloud features that we have, whether it be in the public cloud or based on Kubernetes or any cloud native system? It should be able to run from a container standpoint. Cloud ready versus cloud native, so just because a database can run in the cloud doesn't make it cloud native. A virtual machine running an EC2 instance isn't cloud native, it doesn't scale the way it should. It should have the services software and the APIs that enable us to enhance that elasticity of that database being able to scale up, scale down and deliver that as a service. Even though we might not be offering that as a service provider, we might be just needing that for our application and be around Kubernetes as a de facto way of being able to orchestrate our cloud native databases. Benefits of those cloud native database, you've got advanced scalability so we can scale up, scale down as fast as we want. I'll try and show you some of that in regards to a demo shortly as well. We've got the elasticity of that, how and when we run that and when we scale that. The resiliency of that, having multiple copies of that running available to us across multiple geos and multiple regions. Automation, a lot of that needs to be automated in terms of when do I need that to be scaled up and scaled down according to load or to requirements. The accessibility again goes back to that geography region type demand. The cost of that and I'm going to get into that a little bit because that should have an asterix on again around depends. The management of those cloud native databases because what this trend is doing is allowing us not to just have one large database server and we're just going to throw everything into it like I think we did traditionally, is now we can choose the right database for the right job. So whether that is a NoSQL or a MySQL for one job, a MongoDB for another, et cetera, et cetera. We can choose the right job and the concept of micro database services kind of becomes a reality with cloud native. So whether we see cloud native databases is not just running a stable set within Kubernetes. We see running outside of the Kubernetes cluster. So think about PAS-based services such as MongoDB Atlas or Amazon RDS to name a couple. The application is still within the Kubernetes cluster, but it might be hooked into that PAS-based service. But that PAS-based service, and notice how I'm not saying that this is a virtual machine set in EC2 or in a virtual machine, but this gives us the ability to scale accordingly what that needs to look like, but our application has that access into that data service. We might also be running a dedicated infrastructure Kubernetes cluster where we run all of our storage for and exposing that out to maybe another cluster or to another service that leverages that. A lot of enterprise storage actually have gone down this route as well to be able to define what their storage offering looks like. And then running stateful workloads within the cluster, right next to your application that requires the latency, the control as well, because I'm going to go through some of these areas because not all, it's not one size fits all. There's going to be some good, bads, and unknowns to why. So here I just wanted to touch on what's the ease of use versus the cost. So if we think about a virtual machine traditionally, a virtual machine or physical you could have there in the middle, you've already made that or your company has already made that, potentially made that investment, especially VMs on premises or physical, you've really got that server. It's quite a task to be able to then look to migrate or relocate that or at least repurpose that into containerisation or cloud native format. So sometimes that middle ground is the easy button, right? We stay there. And that's kind of what we're seeing in the industry is that it's much harder to move petabytes of data than it is to do the front end first and containerise that. But then we've got three different other options. We've got PAS, which could ultimately be a much higher ease of use because we take away a lot of the control, a lot of the tweaking of what that needs to look like, but then also it's going to cost you a lot more money. So you pay for the advantage of not having to look after the underpinning operating system or the hardware even underneath that. You're paying someone else to look after that. But then you've got Stapleset, so much lower cost, but it's kind of middle of the road from a manageability point of view. And then over to the right, again, ease of use, but again cost because you've hopefully already invested in your cloud native infrastructure, whether that be Kubernetes, you've then got your operators. Hopefully that makes sense as to where that is, and it starts to dive into a little bit more of the... OK, so I've got all of these choices, this overwhelming amount of choices as to where I run my database, but OK, which one should I choose? And I think it comes down to, depends on you and your team, if you want more control of your database, then you're probably not going to go into the PAS. If you need more control and performance, you're probably going to go down to this bottom right hand corner in the future. But it might be that you're stuck because the business won't allow you to move out of that VM model that you maybe once had. OK, so Stapleset came around, so Stapleset is the way in which we can provide a way in which the Kubernetes controller to define what our application and data looks like. So Stapleset versus deployment, again, if I had a longer time, we could go through what is a Stapleset and what is a deployment, but a Stapleset is going to define how your pods are rolled out and then ultimately the rollout strategy for that. When you run a Stapleset, you're going to have whatever that pod name is, hyphen zero, one, two, three, where as in a deployment it's going to be some spurious UUID and actually if you start scaling up, scaling down a deployment, it's going to, there's no order. When it comes to a Stapleset, we're going to go three, two, one, zero and we're going to go zero, one, two, three in terms of rolling out. In terms of goods, it gives that ordered deployment that I've mentioned, that unique identifier to that. From a bad point of view, though, if you're just managing a Stapleset through a YAML file for multiple databases, remember I said, now I've got the choice, I've got an overwhelming choice but a freedom of choice of being able to choose all of these different databases for different tasks and I've got a different Stapleset for each. Now I've got to manage all of the YAML for that, that seems like an overwhelming headache as well. So complex configuration, scaling limitations on that as well but it gives you the rolling updates as well as the unknown. What does the performance look like? I don't know what your cluster looks like, so there's generally not going to be any speeds and feeds because a Kubernetes cluster can be the smallest of performance to the most money that anyone can spend and give you all the resources you need. There's no linerage to that. Now this is where I would go in and normally do a quick demo on what a Stapleset is, the benefits of that and then be able to do that. What I'll do is I'll record a longer version of this and put it onto YouTube or somewhere and I'll share that in the Slack channel but really looking at how do we deploy Postgres as a Stapleset within our Kubernetes cluster. The one thing I missed out here and I'm conscious of time is also around Helm. Helm gives us maybe a little bit of a gap in between deploying a Stapleset and having to manage all of my YAML manifests to being able to deploy using a Helm as a package manager for Kubernetes and be able to deploy my application that way whether it be Postgres or MySQL. Then we get to operators and operators take away some of those burdens that we maybe have from just a vanilla Stapleset in that it gives us automated operations. It means that we could use, for example, the cloud native Postgres operator allows me to go and deploy what I want, a desired state for whatever that Postgres implementation needs to be. It allows me to leverage custom resources. It extends Kubernetes to be able to leverage that which also allows me to then look at the scalability of that and the self-healing around that. So taking away some of those pain points that we have in just Staplesets. Now operators generally will be using Staplesets as well but you've got a higher level overview of that, a controller, if you will, that is going to be looking at that Stapleset or looking at the whole deployment and making sure that things are the desired state, the reconciliation loop is going to make sure that things are how they should be. Bad around complexity and resource intensive, because you're running something that's looking at something and it's going to be giving you that, but hopefully that's worth the squeeze around that. Security implications around custom code. Again, I would go into more detail around that. The unknown is the operator ecosystem. Granted, it's thriving at the moment. There's lots out there if you go and look at the operator hub. We've got lots and lots, but there obviously could be a lot more. There's a lot more data services that are available. The one that I mentioned, Cloud Native Postgres, is a popular option as is Crunchy Data, which is also a Postgres operator. Again, this is where I'd go in and just show you what that would look like in terms of that deployment and what that desired state loop actually looks like. What is that operator doing? It's looking at this reconciliation loop. We're defining what our database service needs to look like via underpinning YAML again, but it's going to be constantly checking to see whether that desired state has been achieved. If you want three pods in your Postgres deployment, then it's going to constantly go through, observe and adjust what that needs to look like. Again, that's going to allow us to update that. There's a lot more. You could do a whole session on the reconciliation loop and some of that, the continuous control. It's going to be synchronising the state between the three or however many pods or nodes that you have within your cluster and all of that good stuff. That brings us on to the third and final option around external paths. Has the overhead overhead overhead overhead. Again, this brings us the ease of use, but the cost is going to be up there, which is fine. As long as we're aware of that, that unknown, then that's what we can take to our business and we can say, look, I'm not a DBA. I don't want to be in charge of making sure and tweaking configurations. I want to make sure that it's a managed service. Let's push that off to someone who knows what they're doing and we're just going to consume the database as a service within one of the public cloud hyperscalers or one of the many options that we have out there. Obviously, from a bad point of view, if you're a DBA and you want or need to be able to tweak those constructs, then you've got limited control when it comes into paths, but also that cost. The unknown is where is my data? That, again, might fall to some of you in the room, but equally, that data sovereignty, where is my data? How do I know it's following regulation? It gets a little bit more reaction over in Europe, in the EU because of GDPR, but it's a thing to consider and it's applicable to the US and holding any data for EU residents as well. The unknown as well is around performance, although I would say that, especially in the hyperscalers, that performance, they'll give you as much performance as you need, but you're just going to have to pay for it. It's kind of the take there. I've listed some of the options that we have available. Again, this is where I would go to show you what that looks like from a communities cluster point of view where maybe my front end, my application runs and connects into my AWS RDS or MongoDB and gives us the ability to leverage that data service outside of my cluster, but within the confines of the Kubernetes cluster using config maps and secrets. OK, four minutes left. I'm glad I did take that extra two minutes. Conclusions, micro databases are here. I think that's why we're all in this room listening to what the latest is around Kubernetes and data or databases and cloud native. One thing I will highlight, this is the boring backup admin guy coming up on stage first up in the morning to say that it doesn't matter which one of those three you consider, you still need to look at protecting that, whether that's your responsibility or whether that's the business. We still need to protect that. Just because high availability is not a backup, we can still replicate bad changes. I'm sure many of us have made the wrong move or the wrong change within our databases. So we still need that backup, but we also might need to still consider things like disaster recovery as well. I think this is exciting because it allows us to choose the right database for the job. I remember years gone by when I was a sys admin and we spent a lot of money on a certain database type, but we basically had to engineer everything into that database type. Everything into, I'm going to say it, oracle. We had to use that oracle license like it was going out of fashion. So we had to push every single database into that because we wanted to get our spend from that. Now, from a cloud native point of view, I don't have that constraint anymore. I can use the right tool for the right job and it's exciting to see some changes around databases in the ecosystem, particularly around things like SerialDB and what they're doing around being able to bring in it's no longer just a NoSQL versus SQL. They've got a bit of everything all under one hood. This is where I would ultimately go and then show a demo around how do we protect those data services? Again, any of those three, I've got an option to be able to protect. We also, this week, and I don't know if the PR has actually gone out yet, but we donated a way in which we can protect those data services to the CNCF. It's a project called Canister and Canister gives us the ability to protect those data services through an application framework or a blueprint framework where you basically define what you want to do and how you want to protect it. Hopefully, you'll see a little bit more about that, whether it be in the news or across the show floor. Canister.io is the address to find out more. It's quite a mature project that we've been working on for a number of years, but our focus here is to really raise awareness of data protection, data management, resiliency within that data service. Just to finish up, some additional resources and much smarter people than me. You've got a session by Karen Jax from Crunchy Data. She actually talks about the Postgres operator that they've created over there and actually walks through in a less than an hour session. Well worth a watch. Another guy, and he's here this week as well, so if you get a chance to bump into this guy, he's kind of changed his tune, I think. I think I can say that. I'm a friend of his. It's Victor Farsit and he's very much talking that same game around that you've got this overwhelming amount of choice. Just choose the right one. You're not going to be able to or it's likely, and Kelsey Hightower says something similar, it's likely that you're not going to be able to build your own RDS that scales the same as RDS. So take that into consideration as well. But that's another benefit of cloud-native databases in that maybe on day one, we do build our own operator or at least leverage an operator that gives us that ability. Then later on we can always migrate that into, quite easily, into a cloud-based service. The other podcast-type session is Cloud-native weekly. Well worth a watch. They've been talking about the state of the database for at least stateful workloads over the last couple of weeks. So with that, nine seconds left, so I've got us back on time. Perfect. If there's any questions.


It's like people just need to find a way to hate on successful people. I believe all of it. Bro, it's like the poor guy. You can't have a TV show anime. Exactly. Exactly. You can't have a TV show anime movie. Exactly.  And that's all good. I'm a hater. Yo, tell me, has he dated a black chick yet? That's what I want to see. I want to see a black woman say no. He did date a black woman. He dated one of the most famous black women in the world. Kim Kardashian. Yes. Stop playing with me. You're just a cracker lady from Philadelphia. Yo, this is born, y'all. This goddamn hockey over here. Talk about real tough. We can't let these honkies talk about these African queens. That's crazy, yo. You don't even know Armenia's in Africa. You didn't know that.