Hello and welcome to our final AFDV TV preview show before Christmas. With two games last week and two to come, both myself and matchday commentator Chris Temple will be going through it all in the next half an hour. Here's what's coming up. We'll be looking back at that 2-0 defeat at Moulinieu last weekend. We'll also be discussing the Terries in the Carabao Cup and that defeat at Stamford Bridge. And finally, we'll be looking ahead to a busy festive period with both Brighton and Spairs to come. Well first, we'll start back at Moulinieu last weekend and that 2-0 defeat, Chris. It was another tough afternoon. What went wrong? Yeah, difficult afternoon. The weather went wrong. First of all, it was a horrible day to be a supporter particularly. It was freezing cold, driving down with rain as well. The players won't notice that sort of thing, I'm sure, once they get out on the pitch, I'm sure. But yeah, Wolves very organised team. Obviously, you know, the unfortunate mistake by Charlie, which has been one of the issues that's blighted the last couple of games, an individual mistake. And once you can see the first goal against a team like Wolves, as well organised as they are, they've got that 1-0 lead, they then sat back, they play this sort of counter-attacking style where they'll happily let you have the ball and try and nick you on the break. Wolves had a lot of the ball but weren't able to be quite as clinical with it as they have been. Didn't really use it effectively. In terms of chances, you know, Rui Patricio in the Wolves goal didn't have a massive amount to do. Junior hit the bar with a free kick. Apart from that, not a whole lot of other chances. So yeah, it was a day where, you know, some of the possession was nice but just didn't have an edge and obviously Wolves nicked the second on the counter-attack. So it just smacked to the team that were just short of a bit of confidence and just lost a bit of their zip. But hopefully that was the last time we'll see that sort of performance for a while. And obviously, Callum Wolves, you didn't start the game. Does that game last week kind of prove how important he is for the club? Yeah, as we've said before, you know, they haven't got anybody exactly like him. The form he's been in, of course, you're going to miss somebody like that who's got 10 goals this season if you include his England goal as well. You know, he came on towards the end and actually did give them a little bit of a spark when he came on. But I think it was probably the right call not to risk him hamstring, you know, is a pretty perilous injury to have when you've been, when you've got a big schedule of games coming up. So yeah, I think he did add something when he came on. But again, he didn't really get fed the scraps if you like to be able to turn into some sort of feast. And we saw that Lerma and Sermon partnership in midfield. What did he make of it? Yeah, I think they've had a good couple of games actually. They were probably the two who did sort of make Bournemouth tick.  The last two have been less than subtle, I think he was to be fair. He's put in a bit of a spot by Jordan and I, but I think he gave him a bit of a Spanish volley. Not sure how good Jordan and I have Spanish is possibly not that good. But yeah, Jordan and I certainly knew about it. But Lerma and Sermon, yeah, you know, a couple of games together. Growing as a partnership. Let's not forget Andrew Sermon, as we've said before, hasn't played a lot. So he personally needs to get up to speed as well. But he was good, I thought, at his old club. Two of the players who kept the ball moving, kept things going, trying to feed it to the creative players to make something happen. But ultimately, it just didn't, unfortunately. And Tyron Minx went off within the injury during the game. It's great to see that it's not as bad as it first. Yeah, it looked nasty at the time. You think for a guy like him, we've not had a lot of luck at all with injuries. You think he looked in real discomfort. It was a blow on the hip or to the sort of lower back area. It looked really painful. The Walls fans were giving him a bit of a stick. And I did, I've had to block Walls fans all week on Twitter because I called them a bit classless for booing mings because he was clearly in trouble. But yeah, good to see him back in the squad against Chelsea and that it's hopefully not too serious. Well, as you said, next up, the Cherries travel to Stamford Bridge to play Chelsea in the Carabao Cup. It wasn't quite the result they were after, but Eddie Hall had plenty of positives after the game. Eddie, a tough way to lose tonight. What are your thoughts on the game? God, yeah, hugely disappointed. It's disappointing. Two years in a row, we've got the same feeling coming here. You know, we did, did ever so well in the game as we did last year. And we were in the match. We were committed. Everyone gave everything to achieve a positive result. Unfortunately, Ian Hall has won the game for Chelsea again. And your side team to grow into the game. What was the message at halftime? Didn't want to change too much tactically. I thought we were OK. It was more individually, just a little tweaks where we could improve. And second half, I thought we were fine. As you say, I thought we grew into the game. We played with more confidence the longer it went on and had a number of really good counter-attack opportunities. So I'm very, very pleased with the team, with individuals, within the team. It was a really good night for us. And as you said, it took Ian Hazard to break the deadlock and it was a deflected goal. That's a cool way to concede, isn't it? Yeah, that's the way it's going for us at the moment. Unfortunately, we're on the wrong end of any bounce either way.  And then at the other end, the winning goals. A cruel one on everyone, because defensively, we were very good tonight. And it's another strong performance against one of the big teams. That's something your team can take big confidence from, isn't it? Yeah, it is. The performances against the big teams this year have been strong. The results, I haven't followed that pattern. It's been very different to other years where I remember we beat Liverpool and I don't think we played well, but we beat them in Arsenal last year at home. I don't think we played particularly well, but we beat them this year. We're playing well and we're not getting the results. So it's a difficult one to take, but we have to. We have to be men about it and take it on the chin and make sure that we double our efforts to make sure we come out of this spell. And there are a number of players that played tonight that haven't quite, perhaps, had the minutes that they would have liked this season, least to say, Jordan and Ive. What did you make of them? Very good. Yeah, very good. I thought that was Lease's best performance for the club. And Jordan, maybe even Jordan's best performance for the club and respect he's playing out of position. And I thought he was excellent defensively against one of Chelsea's best players. So I'm really, really pleased with both of those players. But there's others. Diego Rico, Jack Simpson after Boric, David Brooks, Junior Stanislaus playing out of position. Very, very pleased. You mentioned Art of Boric there. He made some big saves tonight. Yeah, whenever you come to these games, you need your goalkeeper to play well. And right from early in the match, he made some key saves for us, which gave us the confidence to build and grow into the game. So very, very pleased for him. And now the focus turns to Saturday Brighton at home.  Yeah, pleased to play at home. I think we know how important the game is for us. We've already spoke about it in the dressing room. If we take the confidence and attitude from today's game, we look forward to the match. Well, that was Eddie Howe after Wednesday's performance in the Carabao Cup. And Chris, it was a much-improved one, wasn't it? Yeah, to be honest, it was everything you could have wanted from a performance except the result. The noise from the Cherry's fans at the end, that will tell you exactly what they thought of the performance and the effort levels and absolutely everything else that the team put in. Of course, let's not forget a team with several changes. A team with lots of players you haven't played a lot of football. I think of Diego Rico. He's hardly been on the pitch recently. He had a difficult day at Wolves in the league, actually, when he came on. Jordan Ibe, who hasn't played in that role a lot. I mean, Rico and Ibe, for me, are the two players who haven't played any football but had to be up and down that flank in those wingback positions. I thought they were both absolutely terrific. Arta Borowicz, we've got to mention him. He's been excellent this season when he's had his chance. He's limited to league cup games. I spoke to him before the game and he said, you know, all I've got to do is just take my chances when I get them, show what I'm capable of. From his point of view, show he's worth a new contract possibly as well. He's only on a one-year deal at the moment. 39 in February, but goodness me, there's a couple of terrific saves in there. One from Giroud right at the end. The one where he came out to deny Willi-Anne as well. He stood up massively tall. Yeah, terrific saves to keep the team in it. And you need your keeper to have a good day at places like that. You need to keep the, you know, when they do get chances, keep them out. But right at the end, there was a couple of scramble. As you know, there was an almighty scramble at the end where the ball could have gone anywhere and a couple of opportunities. You know, Aretha Balaga made a save or two as well. So all in all, it was everything but the result. Eddie said he wanted the performance and the result together. Well, he got the performance that time, but not the result. So hopefully now as we move into Christmas, the two can come together. And in terms of Chelsea's goal, did you feel like there was a foul in the build up there? There was a big case for it. I think I said in the commentary that was surely a foul on King as the play was moving forward. But it certainly definitely looked like it. From that point of view, there was a bit of bad luck. But lots happened after that up to the goal. So people were saying, why wasn't it referred to VAR, that decision? Well, that's not a decision that can be referred to VAR because it wasn't directly involved in a goal incident. There were too many things that happened. And of course, the cruel deflection as well off Charlie's hand. Of course, if the ball goes wide, there's a case that could have been a penalty anyway. So yeah, all in all, it just didn't bounce. And they brought on Hazard and Pedro. Is that a compliment to how well-born was the playing that they felt the need to bring those two off the bench? Absolutely, yeah. Pretty early on as well. Hazard and Pedro came on a few minutes after the start of the second half. They're not the guys you want to, particularly Hazard, it's not the guy you want to see coming on. Even with supposedly 70% fit with a foot injury, he's just probably the best player in the world at the moment or certainly in the top three, I would say. It's just his ability with the ball is frightening. He always does well against Bournemouth. He always seems to make something happen. And as well as he did do when he came on, it was a shame in a way that, of course, it was a deflected goal from him. And even he needed a bit of luck to score the match winner. But yeah, it definitely is a compliment to where they were playing. The Chelsea had to reach for their stars. And of course, Bournemouth were able to reach for their stars still very much in the game when the likes of Joshua King and people were brought off the bench and Ryan Fraser as well. And we saw Nathan Ackie play in the central midfield. What did you make of that one? I think he did pretty well. He certainly hasn't played there a lot. I mean, he played there quite a bit of Chelsea in the youth ranks by all accounts. He did a lot of running. And when you look at the midfield three they had with Stanislaus and Brooks as well, they were probably all looking around at each other for a bit of advice at times. I know David Brooks has played there before, but playing there in youth football is not the same as playing against Fabregas and Kovacic and others. So yeah, I thought they did, you know, as well as you could have asked them to really. It was a makeshift midfield, needs must in terms of the personnel available and the need to rotate and rest a few players. But yeah, I thought the midfield gave a great account of themselves. And Neddy Howell, he was very complimentary about Lisa, he was saying it was his best performance in a Bournemouth shirt. Would you agree with that? Yeah, I think before Wednesday it would be fair to say Lisa had gone backwards this season. I think he'd been less of a threat when he'd come on. It had been, he hadn't really done too much to suggest he would be able to change a game. But he was all action on Wednesday. He really was. They needed everybody to be all action. But he, you know, pace, I remember one run, he bulldozed through about three people. You know, he was creating things, he was working, he looked hungry as well, which is often a criticism that maybe he looks at the way he sort of runs and looks a bit disinterested at times. But I thought he looked hungry, he looked like somebody who wanted to prove a point. And if he can suddenly start to be a factor, you know, you need someone that, if it's not Wilson, it's not King. Moussa is the next in terms of, you know, that type of player. So, yeah, you need him to be contributing to give you a real option off the bench rather than Eddie sitting in these seats that we're sat in right now, turning around and going, who's there? Oh, I haven't really got anybody. And with some big away games coming up, they've got to go to Wembley, they've got to go to Old Trafford. They can take so much heart from that performance at Stanford Bridge, can't they? They can, but of course they need to go, they need to bridge, if you like, from the bridge to Wembley, to the arch with a performance against Brighton. Because if it goes back to square one against Brighton, then the momentum is sucked back out of the sails. But I'm confident and hopeful that they will use that performance at Chelsea to produce a game against Brighton that we'll talk more about in a moment. There's a bit more like fans have come to see, because they will need, as you say, a bit of momentum to take to Wembley and to take to Old Trafford. It's not a favourable festive schedule for sure. Well, we spoke about that festive schedule there. And Callum Wilson is one who has been getting in the spirit. Let's take a look at what happened when he went down to Bournemouth Christmas markets earlier in the week. I don't know, I'll put on my Christmas hat as well, will I? I'll put on my Christmas hat as well, will I? I'll put on my Christmas hat as well, will I? I'll put on my Christmas hat as well, will I? I'll put on my Christmas hat as well, will I? I'll put on my Christmas hat as well, is it blessed? Merry Christmas, guys, I hope you all have a lovely time. My favourite part about Christmas is being able to have some junk food, some trimmings, some chocolates, and things like that. Being a professional, you can't have it as much, but I'm sure that you guys will make up for it for me. I hope you all have a lovely Christmas and a happy new year. Well, that was Callum Wilson down at Bournemouth Christmas market. He's on the front of tomorrow's programme and you can see the full interview on AFCB TV next week. Chris, it's a busy week coming up. How important is tomorrow's game? It's got me in the Christmas spirit look at that Callum Wilson that footage down the Christmas market Yeah, I think tomorrow is tomorrow's massive as we mentioned earlier on, you know a performance at Chelsea You've got spurs of man United to come you need to keep it going now You need to keep moving in the the forward direction keep that momentum going There's no point in going back to square one. I don't think they will I think they'll produce a poor performance here tomorrow The league table is interesting now because it's in three sections. There's the top six We've course man United just sort of at the top end of the rest if you like And then there's a bit of a gap I think there's eight teams and there's a gap to the bottom six in the table as well So it's sort of a six and eight and a six and Bournemouth and Brighton are right in the middle of that middle eight But of course only still three points off six place still seven points ahead of where they were at this time last season Which is again the the context really that unit. Yes, it's been disappointing recently But still way ahead of and you know seven points doesn't sound a lot But that's that is a lot in Premier League terms So the context is you know from the table point of view still very healthy indeed still a long way from trouble And still very much in reach that reach of six position, but Brighton two points behind Bournemouth So we'd go ahead of them with that with a victory and Brighton have been a bit inconsistent this season They've won two away games already Which is as many as they won in the whole of last season one at Newcastle and one at Huddersfield as well So yeah, they've they've got players that can can turn games They're missing is Kierdo who's a bit in and out on his days brilliant on his other days He's not so effective, but of course the one person that Bournemouth fans know will have an iron will be Glenn Murray Who has actually scored seven of his eight goals? I think at home this season. He's not quite as effective away from home He did score a last minute equaliser at Southampton though That's his one away goal that he has scored this season But of course Brighton's threat comes from set pieces Duncan Duffy have scored a large proportion of their goals Shane Duffy suspended tomorrow He's the third of his Games for getting a red card for a headbutt, but Lewis Dunk who made his England debut alongside Callum Wilson And of course cherry's got their own sort of Brighton mole with Steve Cuckoo, you know, his family and whatever all still down that way He'll know Lewis dunk very well from their Brighton days So yeah, there's a lot of nice connections, but the one thing we're not having is it's not a derby of any sorts because you know The the national papers they think they see both for both cities on the South Coast and about a town in Bournemouth case a city in Brighton's case see it being by the sea and they go it's got to be a derby It's a hundred miles apart. It's nowhere near a derby. We're not having it And in terms of our team news it'll be very interesting to see what Eddie Howe does because there are a lot of players that state took a claim for Themself on on Wednesday weren't there? Yeah, a difficult one because you know you look at the league team that was albeit a bit patched up that didn't perform Fantastically well at Wolves and obviously, you know, there'll be a couple of players a bit short of confidence But those that played on Wednesday I don't think could have done much more apart from win the game obviously In their performance to give Eddie a selection headache for this weekend Simon Francis by all accounts, you know, he's still touch and go But I think he he's probably in a good good place to come back into the squad anyway So that adds another sort of defensive option They were sort of forced to go with the three last week so they didn't have enough defenders fit to make up a four really People like Diego Rico and Jordan Ibe who were excellent Have they done enough to force their way into the league team? You know one performance They certainly couldn't they certainly haven't done their cases any harm But of course, you know, you look at the likes of David Brooks who actually has been rotated recently He came in and did very well in that central role at Chelsea So I probably expect to see him back in Upfront, you know, Lisa Mousset knocking on the door very much Callum seems like he's fit and no problem with his fitness now Joshua King possibly hasn't quite been effective as effective in the last two or three games So there's a possible option there that Lisa Mousset, you know While he is a confidence player and he seems to be full of confidence at the moment He could he certainly will give Eddie something to think about I'm sure So I think, you know, I can't imagine too many changes But I would have thought there would certainly be one or two And the players that had their chance on Wednesday night, you know I've seen lots of people on Twitter saying Arta Boric, you know He's earned himself a place in the team, hasn't he? Begavitch has had a couple of moments in the last couple of games You know, you think of Man City and obviously the Liverpool game as well I don't think you could judge it as Begavitch just on two little Not even mistakes, just two even little slips slightly whatever Because he's been pretty solid the rest of the season harsh as that is on Arta Boric I wouldn't necessarily see a changing goal But yeah, there are things to think about for sure And with Spurs and Man United to come They'll be really after those three points tomorrow, won't they? Yeah, that certainly has a, you know, an important look about it It's the first Saturday three o'clock home game since the Southampton game Which feels like a long time ago That was back in towards the end of October, wasn't it? So yeah, with the 1230s and the Sunday afternoons It's all been messed around a little bit So it'd be nice for Cherry's fans to get back in a routine I don't have to work out what time I'm supposed to wake up for a home game When you've got to get here at 930 Allowing for the cones which are gone as well It's all happy days now, three o'clock No cones on the spur road trying to get here But yeah, in terms of the games to come up You know, you take anything You take a point for sure at Spurs and Man United Man United obviously going through a bit of upheaval at the moment Spurs game at Wembley last year wasn't a great spectacle Spurs 1-0 played very functionally Quite like Wolves, happy to let Bournemouth have a bit of the ball Spurs play a bit side-to-side, passy-passy stuff But of course they've got so many quality players So yeah, it was a tight game at Wembley last year Great place for the fans to go though Albeit with no trains, a bit tricky to get to Parking around Wembley I hope you've got to take a mortgage out for that by the way It's about 40 quid to park at Wembley Before you get a shock, take enough cash Of course you'll be paying for the Cherry's media team to park I'm sure Zoe Of course, of course It was a Christmas gift But yeah, no, some great games Spurs and Man United away great games And that actually then is, you know That is the big teams out the way for a little while And of course Brighton coming back relatively quickly in the FA Cup as well And that Spurs game, they've struggled against them in the league But what can they do differently on Boxing Day to try and get some results? Yeah, I think back to the game here The only point they've had off them actually The Neil Mill draw going back a couple of seasons here When it was, that was where they just threw absolutely everything That was a great Neil Mill I think that was a Saturday lunchtime game as well A brilliant Neil Mill The one thing, you know, Spurs haven't been that massively fluent You know, they huffed and puffed to beat Burnley at home last week The Cherry's went there, they didn't park the bus But they certainly, you know, the bus was in the proximity of their goal Let's put it that way They went there relatively defensive I think it was a 5-4-1 if I remember rightly in terms of the setup I don't know whether they'll, they need to, with the players they've got They need to go, they go to Chelsea and play a three at the back And, you know, show some good form on the counter That's probably the way they need to go away at Spurs And maybe similar at United as well Two teams who were, you know, happy to have the ball But, you know, will hurt you if you give them a glimmer So, yeah, most importantly is to go into those Spurs and United games With a performance and a result together from this game against Brighton Because, like we saw for the Huddersfield game The three points were important But actually, Eddie wanted the performance and the result together He only got the result there Chelsea got the performance, but not the result So it's about time the two things came together And in terms of that Spurs game, they've got Harry Kane They've got Christian Eriksen, they've got Deli Alli They've got stars all over the pitch It's important to nullify those threats, isn't it? One thing Bournemouth have got used to in the last few weeks With the fixed list they've had is keeping an eye on star players Mentally very tiring games Mentally, you know, you've got to be absolutely on it You know, with all these players that can hurt you in the blink of an eye So Bournemouth have been wise to that You know, actually Liverpool obviously were very comfortable here But the other big games, you know, United Arsenal City obviously were comfortable as well But the home games, they've managed to sort of keep an eye on Some of the key threats away from home Where the home team will dictate it more You know, it's a bit harder sometimes to keep those guys out of the game As we saw with Eden Azard at Chelsea the other day But, you know, again, soaking up pressure is something they've done You know, at Chelsea they had to soak up a bit of pressure Home fans get a bit gnarky The rest of the way the game goes Staying at 0-0 for a long time So, yeah, I would say Bournemouth form it in patches Not against Liverpool, not against City But in the other big games Certainly gives them some sort of confidence to take to those games, yeah Well, it's certainly going to be a very exciting week ahead That's all we've got time for today We hope you have a very merry Christmas And we'll be back afterwards to preview the game against Manchester United Thanks for joining us Merry Christmas


The Columbia Broadcasting System presents Norman Corwin's One World Flight. You're standing in the Mykosky station of the metro under the heart of Moscow, awaiting train signals to workmen in the subway to clear the track.  Holy cuckoo, bless God! In the library of a pleasant house in New Delhi, India, talking with Pandit Nehru about the world and the future, he says, But if we think of freedom for one world, then all this racialism and one race or one nation or one country being fundamentally superior to another, that has to be given up. No doubt, people are not all alike, nations are not alike. Everybody is not the same as clever or as strong as anybody else. You're in a hotel in Manila, sleeping at 6.45 in the morning, and suddenly you're awakened by sounds of the reconstruction of the Philippines going on right outside your window. What you've just listened to, the hammering, Mr. Nehru, the peddler, and the subway train, are fragments among several hundred authentic sounds of foreign places and voices of foreign people to be heard in a new series of CBS broadcasts beginning with this one. Last February, two American organizations, the Wilkie Memorial and the Common Council for American Unity, established an award consisting of a flight around the globe, a flight intended to dramatize and perpetuate Wendell Wilkie's concept of one world. The first winner of the award, chosen on the basis of contributions already made to this ideal, was the CBS playwright and producer Norman Corwin. Last June, Mr. Corwin, with Leigh Bland of CBS and a magnetic wire recorder, set out on a globe-circling trip in the course of which they preserved a hundred hours of the voices and opinions of the people of 16 countries. Tonight and every Tuesday night for the next 12 weeks, Mr. Corwin will bring you the story and record of his one world flight. Footnotes, all made of music, all identified sounds, all foreign voices heard in these broadcasts were actually recorded by Corwin and Bland in various parts of the world. The singers, for example, are Arab women sitting on a rooftop in Cairo on a warm evening last August, celebrating the independence of Egypt, an historic event which occurred that very morning. This is Norman Corwin. These broadcasts have to do with some of the people of the world and with much of the state of the peace, and therefore I believe they have to do with you and me. Today, if war comes anywhere, it will be close to us. No place is far anymore. We are one with others, whether we want to be or not. Tonight, we will stop in no single country, but by way of preview, introduce you to some of the hope and despair that exist side by side in the world today. This aspect I present first before beginning to tell you any progressive story of the flight, because to the observer traveling as I did, it is what strikes you first and asserts itself most often. The war has left in its wake all kinds of attitudes and conditions of mind and spirit, ranging from unshakable confidence to active fear. And it becomes apparent, at least it did to me, that in the drawing together toward the middle of extremes of economic, social, political, and even of certain religious philosophies, lies the safest, if not the only way, to a lasting peace. Within this theme, you will hear tonight moments out of interviews with people high and low, optimists, pessimists, liberals, fascists, communists, stevedores, prime ministers. For example, in the cabinet room at number 10 Downing Street, you sit with the British prime minister, Clement Attlee, at the long beer cabinet table. He pops a pipe and he answers your questions in a friendly, relaxed manner. After all, we're trying to clear up after the Greatest War in history, and you can't expect all the problems of that war. Good many left over from a severe urban light, but I think it's worthwhile paying some attention to the heritage activity which serves agreement. Hopeful enough. But then there's the poor widow, Camilla, in the Italian mountain village of Vannuvio, who lost all her hopes in a single day of war. You stand in a square of a shattered village under the boiling sun. Her neighbors crowd about you. You ask her questions through an interpreter. How big is her family? About a three yard. I live with her spirit. She had three children. Two have died and she has one alive now. Two of them were killed in the bombardment. Now, what about her husband? Her husband was killed in the same bombardment. All of them died together. Two children and a husband. I see, so she has one child left. She lost her father and her husband as well as two children and about ten relatives, close relatives in all. You ask where she lives, what she gets to eat. She says she never eats breakfast. At midday she has a thin soup and in the evening a piece of bread. Can she not afford to eat more or is there not enough food available?  What are her hopes for an improvement in this condition? And then the tall finance minister of Denmark, Thorkel Christensen, who's not so sure that we're finished making widows through warfare. You interview him in an anti-room to the house chamber in the parliament building in Copenhagen. He pauses for a long moment before he answers your point blank question about war. Do you feel that there is going to be another war? I'm very much afraid of it. In fact, you are. You think there is a real danger of it? I think there is. And across the world from Copenhagen, at a dockside in the beautiful harbor of Sydney on a clear, sharp day of the Australian spring, a big gray-haired, God-fearing stevedore takes time off from loading the good ship Corinda to point out a path for the nations. I remember the aristocracy of the working class. That's the water-side workers' federation. And now we're looked upon as the aristocracy because we give leads in matters of progress that affect the workers. Now, why did you learn your very good, extemporaneous power of speech? I learned it from intense studies for many years by myself. You were not a university man? No. No. I've only had an ordinary education, but by the power of God through the Holy Spirit, He has put in my heart the words that are acceptable to hearers by trying to live the life. Trying, Mark. You don't say that I've succeeded, but I've made a reasonably successful effort. Do you share with the two gentlemen that I've just interviewed here confidence that we are going to get through the next 25 or 50 years without war? No. No. You will not get through without war unless the world regenerates itself in a sincere line. I would suggest that the great powers assure Russia that they do not want war and also get an assurance from her that she is satisfied to work at her own destiny with the territory she has and her compensation as the result of a terrific sacrifice of this war. And in Russia, the editor of the Moscow News, Mr. Borodin, addresses a dinner given you at the hotel metropole by the Soviet Society for Foreign Cultural Relations. He speaks very slowly, professing the friendship of his country for America, describing what he calls Russia's, quote, tremendously difficult struggle to protect the great interests of a great people, unquote. And then he warns against those who are crying for war. You may have difficulty at first making out the words conflagration and influence and the name of the writer Gorky. Please tell your people that congregations don't start at once. They start from spark. So apparently they have no influence but the conflagration starts and there are people who start the words conflagration as our great Gorky said in order that it be war on for some people. Let me repeat that. Gorky says that there are people in the world who start the conflagration so long as it upwards in a bit of war. They don't care for the interests of humanity so long as it keeps them warm.  The phrase one world comes easy. There's nothing hard to remember about it. There was a time when the world meant to the average man a blur of lands and matters outside his life. Long journeys he could never take, languages he would never understand and customs he could never fathom. But twice in our time the world reached into his life and shook him up. That was the least it did. It was a world problem, not a local feud which took your neighbor's boy out of his class, his uniform and killed him. And it could happen again. Tonight, if you think much about it, one world means urgently and above everything else, survival. It has higher meanings, of course, such as the wholesale rewards of total unity, meanings not comfortably smirked at or dismissed like goodwill and the brotherhood of man. But it was within the less idealistic meaning of the phrase, within the immediate and concrete meaning set out on this trip. I went looking for practical testaments of agreement for signs of a uniting world. I found less of these than we would wish for, but I also found plenty of hope. I listened to people's troubles and to nations' troubles, which are often the same thing. I witnessed many a disagreement, sometimes in the form of violence and death. But because I felt all of it belonged in the record, down as well as I could, whenever and wherever I could, what I thought related to the present and the future and to one world. At no time did I attempt to conduct a poll or to make mathematical measurements. In essence, I recorded that which I felt to be significant to us and to these days. Not always were the profoundest things said by presidents and premiers, often in quite unexpected places. Ordinary people, humble people, spoke wisdom, which came through interpretation undamaged. One night, I was dining outdoors at the Giena restaurant in Rome, and I felt a talking with Sonego, a young Italian partisan who'd fought the Nazis in the mountains and killed a dozen of them with his bare hands. He was at first shy about talking because he looked upon me as a foreign correspondent. But at last, he opened up. You'll hear him for a moment and the interpretation as it was pieced together. I would have been rather unwilling to answer the question of a foreign correspondent because I know that Italy has been beaten in this war and that the winning party is the country to whom this foreign correspondent belongs. But once I've heard what the creed of Mr. Corwin is, that is to say, one world, I must say that that is the creed of all my fellow partisans and of myself. That's what we used to say when we were lost in the mountains in heavy snow and rain, but nobody to protect us, but the stars. Every one of us said, why isn't there one world, one flag under which we can all march and be united? That is why we have been fighting and that is why we believe and we sincerely believe that all the world should be very simply unified under one flag because we do not want to keep on fighting for separate flags, for several separate colors, but for one flag and one color throughout the world. And the Greece-stained Polish worker in the power plant on the banks of the Vistula in Shaffard Warsaw. I asked him what he, as a man who worked in the generation of power, thought of the possibilities of atomic energy replacing steam and coal. He answered, Well, it's possible, but in any case, if you're very energetic, it won't be a good world. I think that maybe it's possible, but I don't think that the atomic energy will be the biggest power in the world. What does he think will be the biggest power in the world? I think that the human being was a greater generator than steam or uranium. In the powerhouse, the restaurant, on the farm by the dockyard in chambers of parliament in the ruined village underground in mines and in planes flying above clouds, I found few people anywhere who did not want exactly what you want, to live in peace, to let others live in peace, to prosper, to progress, to think freely, to speak, assemble, worship and travel freely. Very, very few whom I met considered it sentimental and visionary to talk in terms of a unified world in which security and peace can become sensations greater than tension, crisis and war. Some had doubts as to the way of achieving one world or cynicism with respect to their chances of living to see it, but they all want it. They yearn for it. They are willing to work for it. Exceptions, of course, I suppose, they have to be in order to prove rules. The exceptions were mainly selfish or maleducated people of the type incapable of drawing any inference from all that has happened to them in their lives, incapable of learning the simplest lesson out of the costliest and most terrible experience in human history. There was, for example, the dockhand in the same group as the self-styled aristocrat of the workers. Well, I thought Hitler was not a bad sort at all. He felt the Fuhrer had rescued Germany from a great evil. Well, I was in Haerberg in 1923 and the conditions brought about by the Jews in Germany, they faked into Germany when the war was on, when the last war was on, and the conditions brought about by the Jewish occupation in Germany were frightful. And the young Australian accountant on the busy street corner who said he was convinced that fascism was dead and buried. The body, he said, lies molding in the grave and will for a long time.  But I consider that the potential danger the world priests lies in the coloured races. I can see in the, in embryos, more or less, I can see in the very backward primitive peoples of the islands the Andean, the parts of Asia that I visited, are potential Japanese. I consider that he, given the same opportunity as the Japanese, as many people would today, they talk about raising his standards of living, educating him, and more or less, raising him to our standard, which is an industrial, highly industrial and mechanical standard, I think that he, that he will possibly become a Frankenstein monster and turn on us and devour us as the Japanese. And the young girl in devastated Manila, who, though she well knew what war can be, still could make this recommendation to America. If I were your people in America, I am going to induce President Truman right now to finish up Russia, because if he does that right now, we have no way about her in the next, in the future. There were long distances and intervals between people who recommended this kind of solution for the world's problems. The last such instance before this one came 10,000 miles earlier, not directly, but within a story told me by an Unruh worker, an American woman in Italy. She told this story of the way she had celebrated VJ Day in Bologna. I was in Bologna on VJ Day when I'd heard the first word that the war with Japan was over. I went into the nearest American hotel because I was very anxious to be around some fellow countrymen at this time, and I introduced myself to two young American tenants who were the Air Corps. One of the boys talked with me and said that his father was a very wealthy man, and his father had always been in favor of wars because he thought it was a good way of reducing the population. But he said he felt sure that his father, after his being in the war, and after his father knew about the horrors of the atom bomb, would change even his mind. Consequently, this boy thought there was a good hope for future permanent peace. Suddenly a man came up, another officer. He walked up, joined us, meant talking about the atom bomb, and said that in his mind, America had already lost the war and had done a very serious thing when it had not used the atom bomb on Russia. One of the young tenants arose, walked quietly over to where the other officer was standing who had made this remark, hit him with all his strength, and said, you have dedicated this day for me. Among people who had experienced war, the sentiments of this officer whose jaw was hit and of the Filipino girl whose city had been hit were rare. Much more representative were the Czech underground fighter Dr. Sebe, and the businessman Edgel in Bathurst, and the son of the founding president of China, Dr. Sun Fou in Nanking. The first of these, Dr. Sebe, was an underground fighter, a lawyer who had been captured by the Nazis, tortured with exceptional cruelty, and sentenced to die. I'd bring you now the voice of Dr. Sebe in his full statement except that the recording is poor, as you can hear from this sentence. This is what would be my message to the United Nations. Dr. Sebe said, quote, this is what would be my humble message to the United Nations. Not to breed the idea that there is a necessity of a war between the Western and Eastern conceptions of life. I know that this is the last hope of fascism. In every part of the world, and especially in Germany, fascists and reactionaries do everything in their power to breed the conception of the inevitability of war. I hate this conception, and I am deeply convinced that it is not true, unquote. My talk with Dr. Sebe was in the lobby of a hotel in Prague. 17,000 miles further along in the trip, in the city of Bathurst, on the edge of the Blue Mountains in New South Wales, the owner of a prosperous canning factory, Mr. Edgel, was in essential agreement with Dr. Sebe. I had a long interview with this industrialist in his noisy plant one morning, and at the end of it, he said this. I think the bogie of communism, and I think a great deal less than it was some years ago, and anyway, we're beginning to realise that communists are ordinary people, much like ourselves, and their views cannot in the long run be so very greatly different to our own. And why shouldn't one be optimistic? What's the good of being pessimistic? I think it's only by optimism that we can create the better world, we can get better living conditions, perhaps shorter hours of work, and perhaps more money to spend and more leisure for sport. Maybe that's the best thing, it was the thing we all want, but whatever it is, we've got to work together and be optimistic of the final results. Another man who thought it important to get together, and in a country which badly needs it, was Dr. Sun Foo, son of the late great Dr. Sun Yat Sen, founder of the Chinese Republic. Dr. Sun, now president of China's legislative yuan, spoke at a diplomatic reception to us in Nanjing. Dr. Sun said he'd been asked by Chinese newspapers and outside to comment on whether he thought that the opposing Guomandang and communist parties were sincere about wanting peace. He told the meeting... I believe, naturally, that the Chinese Guomandang and the Guomandang are really sincere about peace within China. I also believe that the Chinese Communist Party is also sincere about peace for us. There is no man in his senses who would want war and bloodshed. A lawyer who had fought in the underground, a government leader, and a businessman, 17,000 miles apart, but eye to eye on the necessity of getting together. And all along those 17,000 miles and the 20,000 more which lay across our route, the majority of people everywhere had, to greater or lesser degree, hope, optimism, confidence. This, in spite of the fact that many had lost their loved ones and had seen their countrymen die, had been invaded and pillaged, had suffered cold starvation torture. They were hopeful, in spite of the known terrors of the last war, hopeful they would not be made to know the thousand-fold terrors of any next war. There were places in the world where hope was feeble or had been extinguished. And there the concept of one world had the toughest going, among the helpless, the homeless, the underfed, the underpaid, the undereducated, the underprivileged. And it seemed to me that not the least job to be done is to distribute hope or the reason to hope among those elements of great populations who today are hopeless and helpless. If the confidence of a lawyer in Prague and the businessmen in Bathurst could be shared with the Salaheen of Egypt and the Untouchable of India and with the widow of Lanuvio, then perhaps we'd be getting on toward the world of Wendell Wokie's dreams. But in the meantime, as I went around, the widow became to me a symbol of hopelessness. This woman was no food, no home, no prospect. Her husband and two children buried in the ruins of fascism. I heard her voice in many places far from Italy. This voice and the echo of guns only lately filled and the silence of the cemeteries, the begging of arms and the whimper of hungry children. This voice and the mute rubble of wasted towns and cities, these were the sounds of need. Need for the hope and for the reality of a united world. I invite you to be with us next week when we will board a constellation and begin the story of the flight as it started in New York. You have been listening to Norman Corwin, CBS playwright, producer and first winner of the One World War in the first of a series of Columbia broadcasts entitled One World Flight, the authentic story with recordings of his 37,000 mile global trip. This is CBS, the Columbia Broadcasting Station.


Killian Moppe, who is best known as a superstar professional soccer player for Paris Saint-Germain of League 1, has managed to snag some pretty luxurious real estate, including a prestigious penthouse in the heart of Paris. Prior to becoming a soccer prodigy, Moppe had lived in the projects of Bondi Paris. The area is full of high-rise social housing and is generally regarded as one of the most unsafe places in Paris. After becoming one of the highest-paid soccer players in the entire world, Moppe treated himself to an exceptional 600-meter-squared penthouse with stunning views of the Eiffel Tower and its exclusive neighborhoods. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a house tour that you do not want to miss. In these videos, we don't reveal any real addresses and even though we've done house tours of our own, please do not show up at any private residences because it is not safe for anybody. Killian Moppe has already had quite the lucrative career, killing a professional soccer, garnering a net worth of $95 million and currently earns $28 million a year. Moppe is already one of the highest-paid soccer players on the planet, including his $28 million salary that he racked up $14 million worth of endorsements for a total of $42 million. Nike has been the official sports equipment supplier for Moppe ever since his breakthrough into senior football. Nike last extended his contract in July 2017 in a long-term contract that also saw the youngster launch his own personalized boots, all at the age of 18. Moppe became the cover star for EA Sports' latest installment of FIFA, making him the youngest footballer to appear solely on the cover of any FIFA game. In addition, the Geneva-based luxury watchmaker Hublot signed Moppe in a deal reportedly worth $1 million per year. Moppe replaced Usain Bolt as the brand's lead ambassador. His salary and endorsements are well-earned. In 2017, he signed for League rivals Paris Saint-Germain on an initial loan, which was made permanent in 2018. A transfer worth about $180 million, making him both the second-most expensive player and most expensive teenager. To put this all into perspective, at 19 years of age, he earned about $24 million between salary and endorsements in just one year.  Kylian is the youngest French player to score a goal in the World Cup and the second youngest player overall to score a goal in the World Cup final at the 2018 Games. In addition to winning the 2018 FIFA World Cup, he was named the FIFA World Cup Best Young Player. Kylian famously donated his entire $500,000 World Cup bonus to a charity that supports disabled children, which was probably because of his humble beginnings. So needless to say, Moppe is considered one of the best players in the world and could be the future of the sport. What's going on guys, it's Clyde Smith and today we're bringing you another house tour right here on Famous Entertainment. Now I did notice about 95% of you watching aren't subscribed, so please be sure to hit that subscribe button because we do post a new video daily. Now if you do like these videos, please ring the bell for the notifications, follow me on the gram, and as per usual, let me know whose house tour is next in those comments down below. Alright, let's get into this video. The first step of Kylian, my first step, it's Bondi, so I think it was a good reminder and a sign of recognition, because I spent most of my life there, I built myself there and I think it's a good place to go. I've been doing this for ten years, I haven't been through that, I've really grown up, I've created my own style, I've grown up as a child, so I have a deep knowledge of this city, this club, so for me it was really important for me to make a big deal out of it. While Kylian Mape today is known as a soccer prodigy and likely will never have to worry about money ever again, he grew up in one of the poorest and most dangerous neighborhoods known as Bondi, a northeastern suburb of Paris. Mape grew up in the Bondi Projects at the residence Sousanne-Bouzon, which is a public housing complex forming a sub-district within the Lanou-Caliette District, located north of Bondi. It was built in 1961 and brings together 253 apartments, distributed across four five-story bars and two-story bar. Around the avenue of the same name, it borders the neighborhood market, as well as the Church of Risen Christ. In 2009, the HLM complex was residentialized as part of the urban renewal carried out by the city of Bondi, in collaboration with ANRU and the social landlord Bondi Habitat. Building C occupies number 17 to 27 of Avenue Sousanne-Bouzon. It is one of three bars, consolating phase one of its residential complex. It has 72 apartments spread over five floors. The average price of the units are 2,607 euros per month and range anywhere from between 1,967 to 3,565 per month, which is nearly half of the average cost of rent in Paris. What's unique about Mape growing up in the Projects is that while the vast sprawl of suburbs and satellite towns around Paris is depicted as a breeding ground for crime and terrorism, it's home to the greatest pool of soccer talent in all of Europe. The town has since honored Mape with a giant mural of the star striker that overlooks the road from Bondi where he grew up to Paris, with the caption, Ville de possible, it reads, translated to the city of possibilities. After becoming the second highest paid soccer player in the entire world, Mape snagged a top floor luxurious penthouse located on the 16th borough of Paris with stunning view of the Eiffel Tower and its cheek neighborhoods. In addition, this duplex offers a breathtaking view of Chompe de Mars and everything for which Paris is famous for. The home is located on a quiet street that must have spoken to Mape as it is located a little further from his training place. The penthouse features 600 square meters and boasts five bedrooms plus two suites. The dazzling home is estimated to cost 3.5 million euros or 3,500 euros per month and features a number of luxe features including a massive roof terrace through three floors with a bar and Jacuzzi. In addition, the luxe home is decked out with rare paintings and traditional decorations adding a touch of class. To top it off, the old beams give this house an old style, typical of the French capital. One of the selling points of this home is the number of oversized windows that give tons of bright light and panoramic views from virtually every room in the house. The home features a number of dining and living room spaces decked out with lavish furnishings, custom fittings and fixtures, a cozy fireplace and large flat screen television as well as an elegant chandelier soaring above. In addition, one of two living spaces feature a wet bar for those that fancy a chardonnay which adds a splash of sophistication with the traditional decor and unique paintings. The open kitchen features stainless steel appliances, marble countertops and an island perfectly centered in the room. In addition, the kitchen features a breakfast nook and a butler's pantry with more room than you know what to do with. With five bedrooms and two master suites to choose from, the master bedrooms feature a sitting area, private balcony access and sleek fireplace. In addition, the master suite features a walk-in closet big enough to pose as an additional room in the house. The ensuite bathroom offers a spolic experience with dual sinks and a large soaking tub that is perfect for relaxation. Moppe clearly knows how to work and play hard as the dig features a library and home office stacked with bookshelves, potted plants, cozy fireplace and a cheek chandelier soaring above. We're willing to bet that he signed an endorsement deal or two in there. As beautiful as the interior of the home is, the outdoor patio and the terrace is truly the showstopper in this house tour. The spacious balcony features an abundance of lavish furnishings, a number of dining spaces to enjoy a meal with a view and is nicely touched with large pillars and an awe-inspiring panoramic view of Paris. I mean, if the view doesn't cut it for you, guess lucky enough to visit can relax in the jacuzzi or grab a drink at the bar. All right, so I think I'll bring this house tour to an end right here. We got to take a quick look at Killian Moppe's homes and after seeing those homes that he snagged, what did you think? Was it everything that you'd expect out of Moppe and out of all the features in Moppe's homes? Which one were your faves? You can even go ahead and let me know in the comment section down below. My name is Clyde Smith and I'll see you guys in another video.


Okay, we're back. This is Dave Vellante and Jeff Kelly. We're with Wikibon. This is theCUBE's Silicon Angles production. We're here at the MIT Information Quality Symposium. This is day one for us. We'll be here all day tomorrow. And going wall-to-wall coverage. Those in our audience who follow theCUBE, you know how we go to these events. We bring the best guests that are at the event to extract the signal from the noise. And Jeff, the interesting thing about this event, we have been covering big data for several years now. And the interesting thing here is we've seen a couple of themes emerge in big data in the last couple of months that we haven't really been hearing. One is security, we had Eli Kahn on from Squirrel talking about that. And obviously had an information quality angle. But the other is this notion of data quality information quality. Now we've certainly heard for years about the single version of the truth and the data warehousing business and the like. But now with the big data meme, I think people are, there's a heightened sensitivity to data quality. And it seems to me, Jeff, my observations are there's a time and a place for data quality. You know what we've been hearing today is look, if it's Twitter data and you're trying to look at sentiment and you get a false positive, okay, that's not an issue. But we're hearing from healthcare practitioners, financial service practitioners, even sectors of the government we've heard from the VA. Major challenges in terms of disparate systems, siloed systems that they're trying to bring together and communicate with each other. And another consistent theme that we're hearing is it's always people process and technology, the technology is the easy part. It's the people and the process. Yeah, but that sounds good, but when you really start to dig into how these practitioners have resolved these problems, it really is a lot of heavy lifting and a lot of hard work. So what were your takeaways from today? Well, a few things. So one, on the point about data quality and a big data context, you're right, it's less about having a perfect data temple with all your data of 100% high quality and it's more about the right level of data quality for the right application. So that's one thing I took away from today. Another was the role that chief data officer is one that's still kind of evolving and emerging, but I think one thing I really took away from today was it's not really, the focus really isn't just the data, it's about the business and it's about listening. There's one skill I took away, or one job that I heard from each of the chief data officers we talked to today that they really focus on is listening to the business. When they start, when they join their organizations, Derek Strauss, TD Ameritrade, we just spoke to, the first thing he did for the first 100 plus days was go out to the business and listen to their problems, their challenges, so that he can understand where to focus his efforts. So it's really about listening, communicating with the business as much as it is about implementing technology to actually apply data quality to your data assets. So those are two of the big things I took away and I think it's all about, again, having the right data in the right place at the right time and less about having a pristine data temple. That's really one of the keys that I took away today.  Well that sounded good but it didn't work actually because you ended up with what the VA had. What that trend described today is very similar to a lot of organizations. We've got hundreds of systems, many, many databases, they're all siloed, there's processes built up around each of those and they don't talk to each other. There's not a 360 degree view of the customer, we're not sharing customer data, there's a lot of data entry going on and of course that means a lot of potential for error. I don't think at all the big data initiative solves that problem, in fact, if anything it makes it worse. What I see happening here in my observation is that you're seeing a lot of, as I said before, a lot of heavy lifting and practitioners are really trying to start understanding this problem, they're getting to the root cause, they're putting together data architectures and I think they're dealing with this big data as an opportunity, potentially to use analytics to resolve some of the data inconsistencies but also as a way to drive business value in ways that perhaps they couldn't with traditional methods. And so I think you're seeing that emerge and we talked today about the old, we've had this discussion before, Jeff, the tail wagging the dog and the balance of value and I think that there will be a natural equilibrium reached between this new emerging, unstructured, new VOData as we heard today with the traditional data. So you're not going to be here tomorrow, actually Paul Gillan is going to be doing some of the co-hosting with us so really excited to have Paul on. Paul is really the reason why we're here and somebody who has collaborated with us in the past and has seen the evolution of the Wikibon and SiliconANGLE community, so we're going to miss you tomorrow but... Well I wish I could be here. So what are the things that we should be looking for tomorrow that you want us to pay attention to? Well I think continue exploring this role of the Chief Data Officer, fascinated by how this is evolving and actually in practical ways inside the organization. Where does the Chief Data Officer sit in the organization? How does he or she effectively communicate with the rest of the business and disarm some of those parts of the organization that are a little wary of that, this new role? Some other things I think, I always love talking to practitioners who are focused in different verticals and understanding really the implications, the real world implications, not the theoretical that we talk about sometimes but the real world implications of bringing in new types of data, the pressures on Chief Data Officers and other data professionals in financial services, in healthcare, in government, to really deliver analytics to end users who increasingly in this kind of consumerization of IT world they want analytics and data at their fingertips and they want it now. So there's this increasing pressure on data professionals to deliver solutions that their end users are looking for to do it quickly. So always interested how people are tackling that problem and then of course, as we mentioned earlier today, these are some industries that are also under heavy regulatory compliance pressures. So how that impacts what Chief Data Officers, data scientists, other data professionals are able to do and how they navigate those waters because those are some serious consequences if you run a file of compliance regulations. Do you agree with Derek? Do you, I mean, certainly he wants to see more Chief Data Officers, that was a good interview. Do you agree that there will be? Do you think this is a natural progression? I mean, what he described to TD Ameritrade, to me was unique that these organizations that he cherry-picked really high quality people and formed this new organization under a CDO in many organizations that would be like internacing battles to actually have that occur. And it seemed to be fairly frictionless at TD Ameritrade. Now maybe that's because there was a business case behind it, you had, you know, COO was behind it, but what's your take on that? Well, I think part of it is exactly that executive sponsorship, but, you know, I think we're going to increasingly see this because I think it was Derek who said, you know, in years past, the focus was on systems and apps and data didn't get as much of a consideration and that's clearly changing. So, you know, data spans silos, right? It can apply to any number of parts of your organization. And there are a number of unique requirements and considerations when you're talking about data in the enterprise that aren't necessarily directly related or not coupled with the applications and systems that are really running the day-to-day business process. So really, I think you're going to increasingly see achieve data officers or people with maybe not exactly that title, but taking on some of those responsibilities of treating data as an asset inside the organization and finding the best ways to deliver data and turn it into value for the various business units to ultimately, you know, drive profits and other cases to, you know, save money and become more efficient. You know, it's going to happen in some more data intensive industries sooner than in, you know, other industries where data is not at least now considered critical. But, you know, as we move forward, as we talked about on theCUBE and in our research, there really isn't a vertical market that's not going to be impacted by data in the next five, 10, 20 years. I mean, even something like agriculture, which you might not think of as a data intensive, industry is going to be impacted. So, I mean, you name an industry, we haven't come across a vertical market that's not going to be impacted to some degree. So increasingly, absolutely, I think you're going to see, if not, you know, CDO by name, there are going to be increasingly roles within various enterprises that their job is going to be to manage and really make better use of data. Well, we hear so much about data-driven organizations, and there's a spectrum, as you well know. Many organizations saying, ah, we're very metrics-driven, we're data-driven, but when you really peel the onion, they're not so much, you know, data-driven.  And so, that's not necessarily a bad thing. So, it's nice to say, okay, we're a data-driven organization, but actually becoming a data-centric organization is not an easy transition to make, and maybe not always the right transition to make, but for many industries, as you point out, it will be, the question I have for you is a natural progression of a data-driven organization, a data-quality-driven organization. What's your take on that? Well, I think, when you understand that, any type of, if you wanna use data to drive your business, to find new lines of business, to find new lines of profit, revenue, et cetera, the only way you're gonna do that is with good data.  So, it really wouldn't make sense to try to make the transition to a data-driven organization if you're not gonna focus on having good quality data. It's just, it's the foundation, really, of any data-driven organization. I don't know, I don't know if I agree with that, because here's why, I think it depends on what industry you're in. So, as an example, I mean, I think if you're in financial services, healthcare, the ones we talked about today, no doubt, but you look at the web scale guys, they're going after value, I mean, it's to quality second, I mean, look at Google, right? I mean, Google, over time, has looked at data quality as a process, and it's certainly improving its data quality, but it's made a lot of money with imperfect data, ad-serving, has been relatively, it's been terribly imperfect for the last decade, and it's all starting to get better. We've had guys like Aerospike on, talking in TapAd, talking about how they're h-streaming, how they're improving that whole system, but there's been a lot of money as exchanged hands, a lot of value created with imperfect data. Now, eventually it's a natural evolution that that's going to get better and better and better as a natural cycle, but I'm not so sure that there's not a lot of low-hanging fruit for imperfect data. Well, right, but what I'm not suggesting is that you stop your business and wait until you've got perfect data before you start driving data initiatives. It's got to occur simultaneously, and it's got to be more of an iterative approach. Well, we heard today from that trend it's not, data quality is not a project, and I couldn't agree more with that. So that's to your point. Right, so constantly improving your data quality is not at odds with the big data approach of the web-scale companies, for example. I mean, certainly there's plenty of low-hanging fruit, but as you just said, even the Googles of the world, the Facebooks of the world are working to improve the quality of their data as they evolve their operations. So what I'm not saying is, hold the presses, stop your business until you've got perfect data. That's not the way to go. It's much more of an iterative approach, but if the quality of the data is not a core aspect of what you're thinking about as you're moving forward, you could quickly find yourself in a position where you've invested a lot of money and time in people and technologies to manipulate and analyze data, but to no avail when the underlying data, the raw material, just isn't accurate. So they've got to evolve kind of side by side, but you simply can't ignore data quality and of course it does depend on the use case as well. If you're serving ads online, that's one use case and there's a certain threshold for data quality you want to reach. If you're prescribing medications to critical ill patients, there's a different threshold. So how you balance those will depend by industry, by work, by use case, but I don't think there's, even in the large web scale companies, I think data quality still has got to be part of their overall initiatives. All right, Jeff Kelly, well listen, I really appreciate you hanging with us today and all the preparation for this event. I really appreciate the invite from the folks at MIT and the collaboration with Paul Gillin who will be co-hosting with me for tomorrow and look forward to that. So keep it right here tomorrow. We start at 10.30 Eastern time and we will open it up, have our first guest on around 10.40 and go most of the day. I think we end mid-afternoon tomorrow. You can tweet me, I'm at D. Volante. You can tweet at the cube, our new Twitter handle. So appreciate all the feedback and the tweets and the support. Use the hashtag, the hashtag for this event is poundmitiq. Go to siliconangle.com, check out all the blogs associated with the videos here today. Go to youtube.com slash siliconangle and we'll have a playlist up shortly. Most of these videos will be up by this evening and also go to wikibond.org, check out all the research around data, data quality, big data, check out wikibond.org slash blog and also look for what we call the shock and awe page where we take all the blogs that have been written about this event, all the videos, we aggregate them into a page. It'll be called something of the effect of MIT information quality. It may already be up. I checked earlier, it wasn't up yet, but it will be up by tomorrow. So we'll let you know what that is. Really appreciate you watching, you're tweeting and we'll see you tomorrow, everybody. This is Dave Volante with Jeff Kelly. Have a good night.


Good afternoon pastor David. Hey John welcome everyone to a random moment with pastor David unfiltered on Tuesdays We like to discuss current events and on Thursdays It's more teasing out what you're going to teach on Sundays, but today pastor. It may be it's not so much a current event But in conversation with you yesterday We were talking and you mentioned something interesting You said there are two kinds of pastors and I wanted to see if you can share a little bit more About this. Yeah, I was speaking actually about something I had read something that had been posted that I thought was interesting and and Basically someone had posted something that sounded like this is not an exact quote, but Sounded like there are two kinds of pastors those who teach through the word of God and Those who should get out of the pulpit, you know, and so we were talking about that because of the value that we place on being a Bible exposer and there are quite a number of men who seem to not understand the purpose of a Church the purpose of People gathering together and they confuse it apparently with some kind of social exercise or some kind of political rally or some kind of Counseling session or perhaps encouraging people to forms of self-help or whatever and they take the Sunday morning sacredness of a pulpit and They make it into something. It's not intended to be And so yeah, that's what we were talking about a little bit yesterday It's that there are pastors who are called pastor who don't actually really understand what the call of pastor is There are those who don't understand that that God has given some to be apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors and teachers in order that they might equip the saints for the work of ministry and the way that you equip the saints for the work of ministry isn't Filling them full of the latest political rhetoric or who they're supposed to vote for or how they see the last days Shaping up and all and giving their opinions and then trying to bolster them with With statistics that they have found somewhere by googling things They're not actually given Bible studies and there are many churches that don't there are many who on television today who I I personally could not sit for 20 minutes in one of their quote-unquote Church services because Jesus is not the center of what's going on. It's the very often it's the pastor talking about his exploits or those whom he knows or Places that he's been or those whom he advises or you name it But it's not a solid Bible study and at my age, especially I don't have time to Kind of like pick and choose through what's being said as to what is scripture and what it's not and what is Opinion and what is just solid Bible teaching Solid Bible exegesis where you get into the scripture and determine the meaning of the passage There's a lot of what is called Isegesis today, which is reading into the passage that which you would like to see there and then using it to bolster a point That you've come to in a presupposition. There's an awful lot of that today. So yeah, we were talking about that Somebody responded to that post by saying oh All that Bible teaching does is creates division And I thought what a what a very uninformed way to think Bible teaching is naturally going to create a division in the sense of you know truth from error is going to be Revealed right there's truth here and there's error there The truth is going to naturally reveal the error and so yeah if you want to say that But this person who wrote this long diet tribe against teaching the Bible and then citing to quote misquote and quote scripture to bolster their point That that caused me great concern because this person thought that their thoughts were valuable enough to actually Write out so all could read them when in fact They were so uninformed and so just wrong I began to wonder how many people Agree with this sloppy thinking Where you say That that the Bible is not important to be taught and then you start trying to quote the Bible to bolster the point That is not to be taught Wherewithal shall a young man cleans his way by taking heed there to according to thy word That word I have hit in my heart that I might not sin against you And God tells us you know to to obey him to do those things which he commands and And the the call of the teacher is to to present and clarify those things so that people can hear What God says and rightly understand it because it's been rightly divided and that's where the pastor teacher comes into the body of christ and This blatant ignorance of the things of God and then to actually put your opinions out there for people to read and be influenced by Is a tragic condition in the church today john And so now that's what what used to be called the lame and that's a person who doesn't have Pastoral or elder or deaconate position, but it's there and so Yeah, I was looking at this post and I was reading the quote and I said, you know, there's truth I've been saying that a kind of thing now for many years I've said if you cannot teach the word of god get out of the pulpit It is not a place for you you're influence people for eternity and just this last sunday When we're looking at jesus is speaking to his apostles these are the men who are to take his message Throughout the world and he says if you're if your hand offends you cut it off if your eye offends you pluck it out If your foot offends you cut it off It's better to go in lame Or to go in with one hand or to go in with one eye to go into the kingdom of god Then it is to enter completely whole into into hady into geena into the The lake of fire and so that's that that's that's talking about getting rid of the things That offend getting rid of the things that would keep you from entering in so be careful what you do Be careful what you see be careful where you go because When you're taking the wrong routes and doing the wrong things you're going to end up in the wrong place, right? Where'd we get that idea from from jesus himself who was speaking to his disciples and saying to them You need to you need to realize the cost of discipleship is very high You yield yourself completely and you follow completely Where do we get the instructions in following if it isn't from the word of god and if we have pastors who are more concerned With who's the next president then where you're going to spend eternity with those pastors out of going to politics And a real pastor ought to take over the church To lead them to heaven because that's really what i'm supposed to be doing. Well, jesus was so blatant about Dealing so harshly with sin Where he's using remove your hand or pluck out cut off your hand pluck out your eye Then i'm wonder how much more is the warning against those pastors who are on the pulpit And not being used well, you know if if you cause one of these little ones who believe in me to stumble It would be better for you to have a millstone tied around your neck and cast into the deepest portion of the sea of galilee So jesus took it very seriously And that's why he would tell and correct the scribes and the Pharisees And all who would come in opposition. That's why he he called them false guides That's why he said that you're like whitewashed tombs. That's why he spoke so harshly towards him Because he said these people are sitting in moses seat You know With authority giving out his law He said so the things that they say when they're correctly interpreting presenting those things do but the way that they live do not follow So no from the very beginning of the in the old and in the new there are there are warnings about bad teaching false teachers and all And the sign that we're living in the last days the sign According to matthew 24 Is deception and so pastors who are in the pulpit and are not preaching god's word but are actually I don't know collecting Spiritual scalps or bodies in their church. I don't know what their purpose is honestly don't I don't know what their purpose is. I don't know why they're there Go into politics or go into some kind of public work that you can do your good things for people and help them It's not that we don't need people to be influenced and inspired to do right But I don't go to church And I and I never have so that I I might walk out knowing who to vote for I just don't I I I think if I read the word of god and I vote my conscience And I'm in a church that teaches god's word to help to form it I think I'll do just fine, but there are there are numbers of places now that I could point to That are disappointing in and grieve my heart and I'm certain Grieves the heart of the lord in many ways also Not that I'm speaking for him, but that was part of what we were talking about just yesterday And so it's important that we take those especially the pulpit pastors take the pulpit very seriously because literally pastor it's Eternity's in the balance And and so well pastor. Thank you for sharing that that was our conversation was interesting yesterday And I thought this would be a good topic for our conversation today And so thank you pastor for sharing and I want to invite our church family to our church services tomorrow Evening wednesday evening at 7 p.m. As you're continuing chapter 4 of Ephesians We'll be looking at verses 7 through 10 tomorrow We're looking at the gifts that god gave to the church and interestingly enough We're looking at verses 7 through 10 tomorrow as a as a preliminary But we move on in the verse 11 following in the purpose of the word of god being taught And why did god give? pastors and teachers to the church and all of that then he calls he calls pastors and teachers apostles prophets And evangelist pastors and teachers he speaks of them as as Gifts of grace that god gave to the body of christ And so we'll look at those those things soon. It's a two-part in that chapter And then shortly after that you'll be on your way to israel going to israel Yeah, I'm excited looking forward to it and we'll even try to get some things out here done for the church family as we're out there and Talking, you know, probably one of the greatest gifts pastor at the church is I mean I'm sitting right here pastor, you know, so I was waiting for you going to stay there You're not a gift to the church Oh, thank you church family for tuning in God bless you. Thank you pastor David for your time and we look forward to seeing you soon God bless you