Hi, my name is Kimon Rowe, Assistant to Mayor Betsy Price and Program Director for Steer Fort Worth and I'd like to welcome you all to the Mayor's Monthly Luncheon Series. The series is a partnership with the Fort Worth Hispanic Chambers Latino Young Professionals Group in Steer Fort Worth to allow young people to have access to key community leaders in our community. Today is special for a number of reasons. First, it's the last day to vote. So if you aren't registered, then you need to have a conversation with me. Second, later tonight, Steer Fort Worth will give an update to the City Council on our community projects and plans for next year. I encourage you all to make it out if you can. The Council meeting starts at 7 p.m. Third, today is the final installment of this year's Luncheon Series. But don't worry, we'll be back next year. We actually have Matt Rose, George P. Bush, and many others just to name a few that will be on our roster next year. And before we get started today, we need to recognize a few folks that have been integral in making the Luncheon Series a success. First, Mayor Betsy Price for supporting us youngins. Congresswoman Granger for taking the time to visit with us today. Thank you. The Fort Worth Hispanic Chamber and L.I.P., Mari and Rachel are here to represent. And then today's sponsor, TXU, Lacey. Can you stand up to be recognized, please? Lacey is going to have an amazing announcement to make later on in the program, which we'll be really excited about. And then finally, I'd like to give a thanks to our host today, Dr. Peggy Watson from the John V. Roach Honors College for hosting us today. I have fond memories of my time here at TCU, and Dr. Watson played an integral part in me coming here. But the fact is, it's just a huge privilege to actually introduce you, Dr. Watson. You're one of my favorite people here at TCU, and she literally built the Honors Program from the ground up. Before I introduce Mayor Price, I'd also like to add that I come to you today, not only as the Dean of the Honors College, but also as a professor of Spanish and Hispanic Studies here at TCU. So if you'll allow me one quick indulgence. A ustedes que hablan español les doy la bienvenida, bienvenidos a la universidad. That was a pleasure. That was a pleasure. My great pleasure for the day and my reason for being here is indeed to introduce Mayor Betsy Price. I'm sure she may know this now because we said at the time we were going to talk about it, but she and I are actually friends on Facebook. I am one of her 500,000 friends. And I've realized that she uses this medium very astutely, not only for communicating information, but also for bringing residents into an understanding of city government. And she has now given me permission to also say that my husband is her orthopedic surgeon because of her shoulder. So we actually have many connections, many connections. She is aptly nicknamed the Texas Tornado and has probably met more citizens personally than any mayor in the city's history through her personal appearances on bicycle with her helmet on in Fort Worth's many neighborhoods. Through her, all of us have entered an era of true representation at the highest levels of local government, and we thank you for that. Please welcome our 44th Mayor and the Pride of Fort Worth Mayor Betsy Price. What Peggy failed to tell you is that she also had children at Pascoe when I was PTA president and she worked like a dog for us. So I appreciate that Peggy. It's great to see you. And Keith did a great job. I can, you know, put my arm anywhere I want to now. So watch out. I might get after you. He just never know. It's always so fun to see y'all at our monthly luncheon. We've just had great series, don't you think? Everybody, L.Y.P., Keeman, Misty, all of my staff, Mary Ann, Jason have all worked so hard, but each of you has worked so hard. I'm still getting tremendous feedback from the community on your presentations and council's excited about hearing you tonight. I told them they're limiting your presentations on time, but I want you to have enough time. I want, remember that you're tight tonight. You'll go live. It'll go out live on cable and then it'll show over and over. So if you want to go back and watch yourself, find the cable channel.  The energy and enthusiasm, it is so widespread that when I was in Dubai last week, we were at a dinner with the Amcham, which is the American Chamber. We had businesses there from Exxon, Lockheed, AT&T, Raytheon, the Perot Group, the Perot's Alliance Group, and one topic came, led to another. And finally, one of the guys said, what we really want to know is about your young leaders group. We're hearing about your Steer Fort Worth Group everywhere we go.  I will puff my chest out and say I'm very proud of my young folks and they're doing a great job. So you are to be commended for your commitment to this. I'm going to introduce Kaye in just a minute, but Kaye, I'm going to take a little time to let Lacey come up and thank her, TXU, for being with us today. So would you like to come up and say a few words? Thank you, Ms. Lacey. And thank everyone for being here. It's been such an honor to work with you guys, Steer Fort Worth and also the Latino Young Professionals. A week ago, I met with a bunch of folks and we came up with a really great idea that we not only wanted to sponsor today's luncheon, but we wanted to take it a step further and come up with something really cool for all of you to help us give back in a really neat way. And what we came up with is for every like on our TXU Energy and your community Facebook page, I've committed to donating a tree to the Steer Fort Worth Urban Development Committee or the Task Force for them to use on future projects. And so please get your phone out, like our page. And before I checked, excuse me, before I came into the room, we were at 56 trees and these aren't little trees.  So go like our page, it is our community page. So search for TXU Energy in your community and simply like the page and I'll tally up the numbers at the end of the day today. And I also just want to thank the lovely women that I'm sitting with today. I'm you two guys, but it's such a privilege to be with our congresswoman and our mayor and Dr. Watson. So thank you all so much for everything that you do. I was in Midland the other day with congressman Conaway and he actually commended you for everything that you're doing right now with, well, I won't go into details, but with Libya and all this stuff going on. And so I just appreciate the service that we do here in the Fort Worth community. It really does impact not only our state but the world as the mayor just mentioned. And I just can be more excited to work with each of you. So thank you and go like our page. Thank you. Thank you. I appreciate it. All right. Now, you know, you don't generally get to have your phones out during meetings like this, but get them out and like them. We can use the trees. JD, we might put them on the river on your project somewhere. JD's got his phone out. If you don't know, remember JD Granger that you had the opportunity to hear at JD's office? That's been several months ago. The river vision projects moving along nicely. It's my honor today to get to introduce my friend, congresswoman Kay Granger to you. Kay is the only other mayor, a woman mayor of Fort Worth. It's just the two blondes as somebody said the other day. She may not want to claim that, but I'll take it. I was at the post office one day and some woman was going on. Oh, congresswoman Granger. I said, no, I'm Betsy Price. Oh, okay. And she went on and on it and finally I said, no, I'm Betsy Price. She said, you're the other blonde. Nobody works harder for Fort Worth and her district, which goes clear up into Parker County than congresswoman Granger does. Kay is a true asset for us. She's on defense and appropriations, too many committees to name. She's solely responsible for helping us keep this C-130s here, which would have been a terrible mistake. Kay works actively on behalf of all of us, particularly in defense in all the jobs and in the quality of life. The bill's coming out of Washington. This is not an easy time for Kay to be working. It's a very partisan committee, but she is committed to continue to serve this committee, this community. And you will not find anybody who works more hours. She was talking about the USS Fort Worth. If you haven't had the chance to see the commissioning pictures from the USS Fort Worth in Galveston, they were incredible. And the sole reason between Garden England and Kay is why we have the USS Fort Worth. But she left there and went to Georgia. And I'm thinking, well, that's not too bad, but she's not in Georgia, not Atlanta, Georgia, but out of the country in Russia. Essentially, you said you got tired of telling people and said, I went to Russia. She travels tirelessly so that we can stay abreast of what's going on and so she can keep, help keep things level and moving for you. A lot of the decisions that Kay's been instrumental in making will directly impact your life and your futures and the quality of our life here. And I'm pleased to call Kay, my friend. So help me welcome Congresswoman Granger today. Appreciate it. Thank you very much. Very nice and great. It's good to see you. Thank you very much. Thanks for inviting me to be with you. I'm very excited about this group. And I'm one of the ones that knew about it and would ask about it. And it's so important that you're taking this interest and really in your community. And it's so important to this community that you're engaged. We need leadership at every level. And this is a very dynamic community. And your dynamism is what we need here today. And we have it. So thank you. For too long, I felt like that you have to sort of be of a certain age to be a leader in Fort Worth. And I waited kind of long. My kids, I decided to get them the best way I could get up to about high school before I got involved in politics. And I ran for the city council, which was truly my, that was, I was going to serve on the city council for two terms. That was the extent of my political involvement. And I ran against a man that was quite a bit older than I was. And the question was, was I old enough? And so it always said Kay Granger, 47. Now there's not another person in the room that think that 47 is too young to be involved in something. But that was that because of the man that I was running against and was older. So we really need, we need your enthusiasm. We need your new ideas and your good ideas. And so that's very important. I'm going to use my time to lobby you on an issue that's important. I think important going on in Washington. And I think it's probably one of the least understood issues that we face. We have a battle going on about spending in Washington. Everyone knows that. We've overspent. You can't argue that we shouldn't cut spending when you have a $16 trillion debt that we're leaving to you and to your children. So it is a huge issue. But from like they talk about the 35,000 mile view, it's a battle not only about spending but how much government we want and what we're willing to pay for that government. And it's a battle and you're seeing that played out in this election. There's a true difference and opinion about how much government is enough or too much. And there are people who are perfectly willing to pay more for more government. And they think that it is important that we have government that's involved in so many of our issues. I sit on the side of cutting spending and cutting government because I think our federal government is so large that it is so unwieldy that some of the issues that you think you can take on are so difficult just to get things moving because there are so many layers of government. Even someone as senior as I am in the Congress, it's very difficult to get done. And so everything turns into a battle and you're seeing that played out in this election. And I think it is a good argument or battle to have to let people think through this. How much government do we want? And what does government need to do and do well? So in this time of change, I want to talk about some of those challenges that we face from Washington, challenges that could impact the growth, the development, and the prosperity of our nation and is of our state and also of this community. Everyone knows that Congress needs to cut spending and we have been. And we said we're going to cut spending. In fact, the goal was cut spending back to the level that we had in 2008. And we passed a budget that did that and we passed spending bills that did that. And we'll cut even more after we go back from the election. And those cuts have been supported on a bipartisan basis, not completely because people disagree on where those cuts should be, but we cut programs and we cut agencies. And it is a time to really prioritize and say what should remain? What should be beefed up? What should be cut? As the mayor said, I serve on the defense appropriations. I was the first woman ever in the history of the Congress to serve on that because we get to make decisions about planes and ships. And there was a long time where people didn't think that women could make decisions about ships and planes. And so we had education, health care. But now that's a different situation. We're facing enormous, enormous cuts in defense. Well, if I say what does the government do well and what should be the first party of government, it's to keep us safe. It's to keep us safe. I said that when I ran for mayor, I said we had a very serious crime issue in Fort Worth. And I said people deserve a safe city. That is a responsibility of government. We deserve a safe nation. We deserve an army, a navy equipment that allows us to be safe. And so those cuts, I'll fight every way I can because we did cut defense spending. We cut it a lot. And that was when Secretary Gates was the Secretary of Defense. We cut down to a level that is risky but defensible. If we cut again, it's too far. I think we do get a time like this. We do look at spending. And you may have paid attention to something that happened recently because I serve on the defense appropriations. I serve on the health care subcommittee. And I chair the subcommittee that funds all the State Department and all of our contributions and involvement with other countries. And when the uprising occurred in Egypt and in Libya, then we put, said let's look at everything we fund to those countries, every single thing, and then look at those very carefully. I have, because I chair that subcommittee, we say all right, this is what the State Department can fund, but the spending that goes to other countries has to come through me. So they send me a notification that we want this much money dedicated to, in this case it was Egypt, $450 million. And when it came to me, I said no. Because we watched in the embassies and our embassies in Libya, embassy in Egypt, we saw some Egyptians really trying to burn down our embassy and take over that embassy and people are people at risk. And part of the law that goes along with embassies is the country of Egypt, when we have our embassy there, it's their responsibility to keep it safe. It's their responsibility. And they didn't do that. They were slow in responding. So I said when we're looking at this, and they're in a serious, serious economic crisis, very serious because most of their economy was visitors. And so who is going to visit Egypt right now? Well, they're not. So all of that income is gone. So the response came to me to release $450 million for Egypt, but I said no. When we do that, we're saying this is how we're helping and this is what we expect. And they didn't respond to what we expect. So I said no. And I looked at all of the funding and we always do it, all of it. And you constantly look at that. We don't just send money. So we're holding spending and we're pulling it back. And we have to keep doing that. We have to keep doing it. We will, after the election, when we go back, we will next year. Businesses are cutting their spending. They're watching everything they do and you know that, the business that you work for. Fewer business trips, more teleconferencing, fewer equipment and supplies. I owned a business for 23 years and I know the sacrifices, particularly small business, makes. And so if I owned that business I would be looking like I always did. Look at everything you spend. That's what we have to do. And I would perhaps cut some things that I had done in the past. Maybe advertising. But I wouldn't cut my contribution to my IRA. Now you say what does that mean? Well, there's a difference. And one thing I'm investing in my future, there's investment and there's spending. Same is true in the government. There's investing and there's spending. And I want you to think with me about the difference because it's very important as we go further. Investment and infrastructure is an investment. If I say I'm going to have funding and I want to put the K Granger Institute in my city and name it for myself and bill that, that's spending. That's spending and it's something that I'm saying I want to do that for my own credit. That's spending. The bridge to nowhere. Remember the bridge to nowhere? Well, it actually went somewhere but it didn't go to somewhere that we think the rest of the country thought deserve that sort of spending. However, if you're talking about investments then let's look at what investments are. I think investments are things like infrastructure that's looking at a growth for our community, a growth for the economy and creating good jobs. Local examples of good jobs are the Trinity River Vision. Now, why would I say that? Well, because it creates 16,000 jobs. It increases our tax base by $1.1 billion. It creates 2400 acres of flood control and develops 800 acres in our inner city. Now, having been a mayor, we know what we go through as mayors and communities as we grow and for such a long time we grew and we didn't want like our shopping in downtown. We want things on the outskirts and so we built out. And what happened? Inner cities collapsed and that we looked at that at a time when Fort Worth was having a very hard economic time and we said, if we're going to build, do we want to build a highway so people can live outside of our city or do we want to make sure that our inner city is dynamic and if you have 800 acres in the middle of your city that you're not having to build highways to that has gone undeveloped or underdeveloped for 40 years, I call that an investment. DFW airport, all the development happens around DFW airport. What an enormous investment that was. What a great return we got. And I don't think there's anyone who's lived in the Dallas 4th area that wouldn't point out a huge dynamic engine that helped our growth and brought companies to the Metroplex because of that wonderful airport that was really in the heart of the country. He could fly to either of our coast. And so they said this is where we need to do business because we can get our goods and services in and out so quickly and so well. So it was a terrific return for our investment for jobs and for support. So the DFW connector, for instance, is a project that's a great example that's a billion dollar investment. It'll make it safer and easier and faster to go to the airport. Roadways will be 20 lanes wide. This is an investment in our future. Think about if you haven't traveled from Fort Worth to Austin recently or within the 15 years, an investment in making that highway safe and efficient would be a huge huge investment in our future and has to be done because as you know it's named one of the most congested, in fact they call it the highway of death. I think my son said that the last time I said I'm going to drive to Austin. And so that's an investment in our future. So think about spending and think about what comes to something like that. It says on infrastructure projects they have to be congressionally directed funding. In other words, the community says we have this need and this need can be filled this way and we'll support it. So almost all those projects have a federal funding and a local funding, a matching funding. And we have to then say is it feasible? Is there a good return on the investment? Is it locally supported? And all of that has to occur before it can have congressional funding and that's the way it should be. Beyond those infrastructure projects, there's so many congressionally directed funding. It means the Congress directs this to be spent. On things that we take for grand that you probably never realized that happened that way like the mapping of the human genome started as a five hundred percent congressionally directed funding. Because some scientists came and said we think we can do this. We can do this in this period of time. But there is this much investment that needs to be made on the front end to see if this can happen. And the Congress directed that funding. The predator drone began congressionally directed funding. It's now one of our most critical weapons. It's now one of our most critical weapons for people to bring me ideas. And say we think we're on to something that can make our nation safer. Can equip our military. And so what I do, if I'm in a position, look at that, I look at it myself. I do some study. Then I go to the defense department and say this project was brought to me. Are you aware of it? Would you want the Congress to fund this to see a seed money? And they say yes. A Texas company came to me. And they could do holographic imaging that could be used for our troops so that instead of taking using a monitor that just showed a flat screen, they could see it essentially in 3D. And guess how they used it? Define bin Laden. And I have that holograph in my office. They brought it to give back to me to keep in my office as long as I'm in Congress. Show other people. So they could see that compound. They could see all the rooms. They could see movement. And they saw it in a 3D, is what I would call it. We also funded in this way an advanced gun mount. Another Texas company came to me and said we have such a problem. We have with Friendly Fire all with going into the areas we're going into now and said we have a weapon that can be used around corners. But we need the seed money to get it started. Again, I went to the Defense Department and said is this something you're interested in? Does this fill a need that is not being met? And they said absolutely. And so we did that. We funded it for one year. We got them off the ground. The Defense Department then took it over and it's used by our troops today. So we have this congressional funded example in national defense, certainly in health care, great deal in health care in the economy. It's not short term spending. To me it is an investment. An investment if there is a need. I'm telling this because that doesn't exist anymore. We could do that but we can't do it anymore. And it came about because of the bridge to nowhere when people said this is outrageous. They're just spending and they're spending for things that we wouldn't approve of. And so we said all right, let's look at the process. Let's look at the process and make changes to the process that will allow that to happen but also have safeguards so that you don't have the bridge to nowhere or other things that you really couldn't stand up and say yes, this was a need that couldn't be filled any other way. And so that's what we were supposed to do. We put a moratorium on those congressional funded projects except we never did any reform. We said we're going to reform it and we never did reform it. Instead, it was lost. And here's what's lost. What's lost is particularly our investment in infrastructure. Now, it didn't cut spending. What it did is it took the responsibility and the oversight away from an elected member of Congress and instead gave it to the administration, any administration. And so for instance, the funding for flooding that I got from Halton for Halton City because they had an enormous flooding problem, that the city of Halton City could not afford to do on their own. No doubt about it. And so I could do that and I went out there and looked at it. I brought in people to look at it. Well, I lost that ability to do that. Now, the day that someone introduces me to the person in the administration who went to Halton City or even knows where Halton City is and understands their flooding problem, then I may change my reaction to it. But they haven't done that. Or Springtown or Alvarado, where particularly in the smaller cities, the first time we did away from this, did away with this congressional funding, it was 75% of the funding went to five cities. And they were the five largest cities because they had the staff to ask for that and to lobby for it and so New York and Los Angeles and almost no Texas city. I think there weren't any Texas cities in the top ones. So the process is wrong. It needs to be reformed certainly. And the Reformation to me says it does it like we've been doing it frankly here in Fort Worth and says, is there a need? What is the need? How important is it? How much local participation is there as the public aware of it and doesn't have a national response, for instance, tower 55? Huge issue. Huge issue on the busiest, it may have been the busiest in the country. Railroad intersection. Well, it was primarily that railroads are not passenger railroads. They're cargo. And so unless you're in the railroad business, you probably didn't know about that, but it had gone on forever and those trains were backed up because it was not big enough to handle it. They weren't just backed up in Fort Worth or just in Texas. They're backed up all of the nation because of that problem. And it took a lot of work, a lot of lobbying by the mayor, a lot of bringing people together, them to say, yes, we need to fix that. It's an infrastructure problem. So I'm saying if we don't have that process, then how do we respond to things like highways or water projects to take care of the 200,000 people in Fort Worth who weren't here when I was mayor? From the time that I left, the time mayor Price came in, 200,000 new people. And they all have 200,000 needs. And how do we respond to that? So I think that we need to, again, take care of those issues, but we also need to make sure that we understand we're making an investment. And when we're doing that in the infrastructure, fixing our bridges, putting our roads, putting to work 800 acres of inner city, then that's an investment in our future. And I think sometimes in this election we're going through right now, that argument over how much government we have or need are willing to spend, we're not making the case for investments versus spending. And to me, an investment in your nation and in your community is saying, I feel good about it. I want to be a part of the future. We had a bond election here that failed when I was on the city council for I was mayor. And it was a shock to us. We don't have bond elections that fail because we put them together very carefully to be able to explain to the public, to be able to say, this solves a need and this is the way we're financing it. And they're very carefully put together with a lot of public meetings to go out and talk to people and say, this is why we're asking for this permission. And when we do that then, people say, I believe in Fort Worth and I'm going to vote for that. I believe in our future. And I think we should be preparing for our future. When it failed, we were all said, ooh, what happened to us? And so we step back and look at, did we really explain to the people? No, not really. Not like we should have. Was it something that they put at the top of their needs? No, not really at that time. And so we really examine that. I watch bond elections in some of the smaller cities. They have a lot of trouble passing a bond election. So therefore the roads aren't as good and their schools aren't as good. But I think if we believe in the future, if I want to prepare the future in Fort Worth for my grandchildren, for your children, then let's pay attention to that. I was in one of my trips because I also, through my subcommittee, do all the funding for Israel. And we're very supportive of Israel and that's the best ally we've gotten in the Middle East, one of the only allies we've gotten in the Middle East. And we work very closely together. And I was on a visit to Israel and talking about the funding. We have an unusual relationship with Israel because we actually have a contract with Israel. We said we will fund to this amount, this alliance that we have, because you're keeping things safe in the Middle East. And so it's a contract. And so I was over there to review the contract. And some of the problems we have, for instance, Egypt said there's also, Egypt is there and said they'll also be an ally of Israel. And we're watching very carefully that they don't. And the mayor of Jerusalem is a very dynamic, one of the most dynamic politicians I've met in a long time.  He was a businessman and ran for mayor. And Jerusalem is one of the most complicated cities anywhere. Because they ask for diversity. They say, come to Jerusalem. Come to this city from all over the world and we want you to be a part of Israel and Jerusalem. And he said, Kay, I'm going to talk to you about something. He said, we're really worried about the United States. And I said, what is your worry? He said, there seems to be a lack of confidence. A lack of confidence. I said lack of confidence here. He said, no, among the American people. They don't seem confident. They don't seem willing to take things on. He said, is the United States going to give up its leadership? I said, of course not. And he said, I want you to understand. He said, the whole world looks at the United States. You're not just a superpower, but you're what we want to be. You're where we want to go. And he said, and the entrepreneurs of the world are in the United States. So the rest of us all look to the United States for that dynamic leadership. And you can't give it up. And I listened to it. And I talked through it. But then I kept going back to it in my mind. I thought, are we really losing confidence in ourselves? We can't do that. We can't do that as a city. We can't do that as a state. We can't do that as a nation because we really are the example to the rest of the world. And people don't swim across rivers and break the law to come into other countries. They come here, the United States. And they come to Texas. They come to Fort Worth. And so I think we have to think about that and say certainly let's be good stewards of our money. Certainly. But let's also make sure that we're building for the future and accepting our future as leaders. You're going to be, we're going to hand it off to you. And so I'm glad you're here thinking about those things. And thank you for letting me give you my thoughts. Thank you. Did y'all have any questions for the Congresswoman? Anyone? I just wanted to ask, like you said, how do we as advocates and future leaders use our voice now to demand that power? How do we demand that power that has been passed on from the Congress to bring that to the local level so that we can raise our voices here at the local level to, I guess, gain consensus. Like I said, regionally statewide nationally for those projects that we know that we need to be able to use our voice now to demand that we know that we need to be working on for the future. First of all, understand the issue. That's why I talked to you about it, to understand the difference in investment and just spending. And be able to be advocates to people who really don't understand that. Yes, we call them earmarks. Well, we said we're going to stop this. I was in a meeting where, with the leadership of our conference, I said, who can tell me what an earmark is? We didn't even have a definition for it. It was just spending we don't like. Well, let's get a definition. Let's understand this. And I think, and then to advocate among people that you know, for the process that says those projects have to have local support. They have to be authorized by the Congress. They have to have public input. They have to have a payback. In other words, one of the things that we did with TRV at the very beginning was a feasibility study. You can do anything if you got enough money, but is there a payback? Well, $1.1 billion is a pretty good payback. So we put those reforms in there. But understand what the issue is and talk to people about it and stand up for it. Anybody else? Yes, sir? Along the same lines there, you mentioned there's a federal discretion to help. Because right now, so many products have huge regional impacts. We've had to approach it at a reasonable level approach. You mentioned, right now at the local level, you know, on-programs also can be increasingly difficult because of the confidence of the things. So what can this group by now help on the local? We have a huge infrastructure that you're loading up now. Right. Well, the way I understand what this group is doing is you're making suggestions for that. And so it's just the first step to appear before the city council. The rest of it is to follow through. And that's when it gets really tough. But this city, it's very proud of the work they've done. And so to become advocates again for that. And they're always looking for people to chair those public meetings. JD, that's how he got involved with the water project, he chaired the downtown portion of all those public meetings that address Trinity revision in the downtown. It's 88 miles a river. It's a huge project. But the downtown part receives the most attention. He chaired that. And so he got to help and listen to people and their input. Become really good listeners because it's not just speaking far. It's listening and get other people's input. Do you believe in this? Can we answer your questions? What more can I get to you? But I would stay very involved. Thanks. Thank you.  I'd like to express our gratitude to you. Thank you so much. Thank you. We also would like to recognize Lacey as well. If you can come up here. That's for you. Thank you so much. Thank you. And last but not least, Dr. Watson, we have a little something for you as well. Thank you. And one last plug. We have leadership for Worth here today. Jan and Harriet, can you wave your hands? They have left flyers, brochures about the leading edge class. They are our partner for Stiffleworth and facilitate all of our task forces with us. And they are recruiting for the 2013 class. So if you're interested, please feel free to talk to Jan and Harriet. And there are several alumni in the room, including myself and John. I saw John Horton here. There's John. So we can tell you all about it as well. And then also in the program, we have several events coming up. We have our one-year anniversary at Jotys where we all got started. It's hard to believe it's been a year, but that's coming up. And we also have the DFW reception as well with Jeff Fagan. So there's a lot of great partying, but we will get back to work in January. So thank you. And have a great day.


Hi everyone Joe for jazby's case breaks comm coming at you with jazby's three box high-end mixer random team break number one With a Super Bowl mixer spot being given away at the end of this break.  Everyone gets a random team all-card ship. This includes a box of 2020 optic hobby edition This includes a box of immaculate collegiate 2021 immaculate collegiate football and then one box out of the sealed case of hit parade limited football Big thanks to everybody here for making this happen Thanks to the people who took the risk on those fillers appreciate it And all 32 teams are in let's roll it and randomize it Five and a four nine times for names and teams one two three four five six seven Eight and ninth and final time. Did anyone feel Joe P. What's up? Did anyone feel like Probo should have been just playing with flags and players playing flag football? You actually watched it See I didn't have that problem because I didn't care enough to watch it You got steve down to martin after nine Five and a four nine times for the teams one two three four five six seven eight and nine and five Well, I mean it's been a joke for decades Joe P. I was surprised that you even even took the time to briefly watch it Chiefs down to buccaneers All right, there's the first half of the list right there. Actually, this is the full break Steve Birch chiefs Alan with the Ravens Steven flat with the Jags Steve Birch with the Lions and Chargers and Dolphins Tim with the Packers Alex with the Seahawks Martin with the Cardinals Nick L with the Colts Nico with the Patriots Steve Birch with the Falcons and the Rams Guy with the Bills Eric K with the Eagles Nico with the Niners Gale with the Bears Mack with the Titans Joe with the Cowboys Michael L with the Cincinnati Bengals Steve Birch with my Raiders Michael P with the Steelers Martin with the Vikings Sean Maddock with the Panthers Joe with the Broncos Raymond with the Saints Joel with the Giants Steve Birch with the Jets Alex with the Washington football team or Commanders Now Steve Birch with the Browns Gale with the Texans and Martin with the Tampa Bay Buccaneers All right let's sort by column B alphabetically All right so there are the two boxes right here Now we have to find a single box out of here So while I'm going to flip back to that list in a second But while you're thinking about trades Let's pop this case open And see what our third box is going to be Although Joe P I do appreciate that You're actually trying to find solutions for this Pro Bowl Everyone else has given up on it Decades ago Joe's like get them in flags Or something like that Bances they need to change the Pro Bowl to the two worst teams To play for the number one draft spot See that that'd be a little more entertaining All right so let's just keep rolling the dice Until we find a box here So first of all we'll go left right We'll use that die right there One two three for the left side Four five six for the right side Three so left side So we'll save these for some other time Then we'll go one two three four or five If I roll a six I'll just roll again Three one two three Boom easy We'll save those for next time All right we're going to flip back to the list again We're going to pause the video when we come back We're going to see if there's any trades And then we'll have the break Stick around be right back All right welcome back folks No deals were done On a Sunday the 6th 2022 In February thanks everyone for Getting in appreciate it So I'm actually gonna do that box last Let's do this uh let's do this box first Good luck Joe Joe baseball empire Joe I did Didn't tire Yeah when's Angel Hernandez gonna retire He's like the it's like the next one I shouldn't even know the names of these umpires They should be If you actually know the names of umpires You're you're either a programmer Of which I am not Or you know they're they're known for the wrong reasons All right first autograph it's cam acres It's a nice time to get a cam acres rated rookie on-card autograph He's in the Super Bowl Steve Birch Los Angeles Rams nice Steve 30 out of 35 Well we know who Steve's rooting for In the Super Bowl the Rams and cam acre Super Bowl MVP You got Jameson Crowder to 199 That is for Steve Birch and the Jets There's Isaiah Coulter to 299 Julian Edelman to 125 We got a Cole McDonald 20 out of 79 Josh Allen Blue to 179 And a Justin Jefferson rated rookie card That'll be for Martin Jeff Ocuda orange to 199 Antonio Ganny Golden rated rookie hollow Doing taxes overrated Logan That's not what the IRS wants to hear And taxes pays for our troops so you don't like the troops Logan doesn't like the troops confirmed Wait Logan works for the Logan works for the government He's joking All right immaculate collegiate I know Rex doesn't like the troops either Rex like he likes the statement Doing taxes overrated Rex hates the troops too How do you think troops get paid Our men and women overseas fighting fighting for freedom Rex and Logan Hates the troops Oliver heard it too They hate the troops No taxes no troops Logan what you said taxes were overrated Doing taxes overrated Logan See now I got you guys in trouble Now like wait a second Well except for the taxes that go to the troops Oh I see And the ones for roads And the ones that fix bridges Well I'm trying to pull up an immaculate checklist by the way All right so we're using that checklist in the Most of these should be pretty self-explanatory though Well maybe you don't hate the troops I guess you hate them getting getting paid a fair wage Rex For protecting our freedoms Foreign and domestic There's 15 out of 49 that's CD lamb For the boys I'm kidding guys I'm sure Logan and Rex support the troops And they pay their taxes IRS Don't worry I do love tax returns Danny That is for sure Jaspy's loves tax return season two Especially Especially after you take care of your own business and then do it Oh well Which we didn't want to take it down that route We were just joking around You took it now it's all serious There's Remandry Stevenson 24 out of 72 And that is for the Patriots That is for Nico and the Pats There's introductions Quitty pay 54 out of 99 Quitty pay Colts Yeah Logan I had to do crypto taxes last year It's kind of a hassle I had someone else do Two-color patch and autograph 41 out of 99 Sage Sarai, is he a saint? Detroit Not a saint I feel like other countries include sales tax into the total I don't know why we don't do that Be convenient We've got Terrace Marshall Jr. 5 out of 10 Patch and autograph That is for Carolina That's going to be for Sean Mattick 60 out of 99 Travis Etienne Nice we're going to see him in action hopefully 100% healthy next year That is for Jacksonville That's going to go to Stephen Flatt All right and there could be Something really pretty nice in here See what we got Good luck So some nice stuff popping out of here And we've got an Austin Eckler Nice Jersey and autograph for select From select football that is Chargers Steve Birch 43 out of 75 Not bad And there you go boys and girls A quick three box High end mixer And you know what's also so high about this We have a $6,000 hit In this break And that's the Super Bowl mixer spot So one spot being given away Let's gather all the names New dice New list And the name on top Let's roll it and randomize the name on top After 12 times 6 and 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 And 12th and final time 31 sad spots here That happens But one very very happy person on top Because you have a $6,000 spot And it's gonna be Wow Alex Alex C Cherness After 12 Did I do this right Alex There you go man I don't know if I called your name at all This break But your name is on top after 12 And you've just won yourself a $6,000 spot I'm Joe for jaspyscasebreaks.com Thanks for watching Thanks for breaking with us And I'll see you next time for the next one Bye bye


From here at the West Berkeley community meeting held to discuss public safety in the wake of two shootings in the area. The meeting was organised to discuss ways in which the community can help to improve safety in their neighbourhood, as well as to inform residents of the community resources available to them. The two shootings earlier this month on 2200 Bonar and 7th and Addison resulted in six injuries and left the community concerned. Police haven't determined yet if the two are linked, but victims and witnesses have been uncooperative. The police also advised measures to reduce loitering and criminal activity. If it seems like there's something going wrong, you hear that little boy saying something's up? It probably is wrong, so you should call us. The meeting also featured speeches from the Berkeley Housing Authority, community youth groups and District 2 Council member Darryl Moore, who advised the community to pull together to protect each other. We as a community can work together to make our neighbourhoods our homes, our places, our stable places to be. So it's so vitally important that neighbours form neighbourhood watch groups that they know who their neighbour is. Some residents complained that Berkeley police are not dealing appropriately with the situation, either turning up hours after residents call for help or accusing residents themselves because they do not know the community well enough. Almost out of a week, five days in a row called, police didn't come until two hours later. We probably have a couple hundred thousand contacts with citizens a year and of those, I think there's a very small number where folks that we contact leave the contact feeling unsatisfied. There was also tension between the residents and other community groups, who suggested that instead of focusing on policing the community, mentoring the youth could help to solve the underlying causes of violent behaviour. A lot of these people have their own businesses. Like I say, bring these kids in, give them a rate, give them a show. That's what they did when I was a kid. Let them paint the door now, teach them something. Don't just pass by and call the police. That's not going to help them. Me, myself, I'm a landscape supervisor with BOA, which I deal with teenagers, ages from 15 to 18, and they get paid eight dollars an hour. I'm doing a part of keeping some of the kids out the streets. Residents argued that individuals, including nearby UC Berkeley students, could do a lot more to help young people in the community to improve the area they live in. Everybody needs to do something. These are kids, you know? Ain't that what the world's supposed to be around? Saving the kids. Residents are hopeful that tonight's meeting will bring better engagement between the community and youth in the area. For Cal TV, I'm Liz Jackson. Thank you.


So an inelastic collision is one where the energy is changing from one form into a hidden form typically So you might have a ball of putty that falls on the surface and goes splat and takes some energy to deform the ball of putty And so the kinetic energy is not going to be conserved a Rubber ball however is going to deform and then Undeform again and so it's back in the state it was before which means there's no sort of hidden form energy there And therefore it's got to have all its kinetic energy back again after it bounces Another thing that's very good at bouncing is not just rubber balls, but actually steel balls This is a Newton's cradle if you have a steel ball and a couple of These hit each other then what you find is that they don't change shape afterwards They don't change shape. They don't store energy anyway And so therefore the energy that goes into the collision comes back out of the collision now if momentum were conserved There are many ways this could happen if I've got one ball coming in it could come to a stop And then four of them could go a quarter of the speed that would conserve momentum or if I had One ball coming in I could have two going off at half the speed So there's all sorts of different ways I could conserve momentum in that collision. However, if I'm going to try and conserve Kinetic energy then this mass times v squared Has got to be equal the mass times the v squared of the final thing So if I have four things going at a quarter of the velocity That's going to have a much lower in v squared because the v has to be squared And so I've got a quarter that'll turn into a sixteenth and so when you have just one It turns out the only way you can conserve kinetic energy and momentum at the same time Is if you have one bouncing up exactly one and similarly if you have two To bounce up all the way through to if you have four hitting ones Is it going to fly off a lot? No, in order to conserve momentum and kinetic energy We're going to have four going on. Alright, so there's a little bit of jiggle there These have a little bit of stick and so the collisions are not perfectly elastic But they're very elastic and so that's why you get the kinetic energy being mostly conserved


Okay, we're back, this is Dave Vellante of Wikibon.org and I'm here with my co-host, David Floyer, also of Wikibon, Wikibon CTO. This is theCUBE. We've been here all day at EMC World. We're going to be here for three days, wall-to-wall coverage, extracting the signal from the noise, bringing you the tech athletes that we can find. And David, we're going to break down Viper. You've had an opportunity to take a look at this announcement. This is our fourth EMC World with theCUBE. You and I have been here many more times, but this wall-to-wall coverage is working pretty well for us. So you've had an opportunity to dig into it. You've been briefed, you've talked to some of the executives, some of the technical folks. So first of all, welcome. Thank you. So tell us about Viper, software-defined storage, the whole software-defined data center. What is Viper? And we'll get into it. Okay, what is Viper? It's a lightweight software layer provided to separate out the control of storage from the storage itself. That's it in a nutshell, and it's being provided for the cloud service community. It's aimed at that community. Okay, so EMC talking about its pressure least, separating the control plane from the data plane sounds very SDN-like, but what does that mean? It sounds sort of geeky. Break that down for people that's here. Control plane, data plane, what the heck are they talking about? What are they talking about? What they are trying to do is separate out the services, storage services, the provisioning, all the other services that needs to be done. Well, let's just break that down. Provisioning, snapshotting, migration, management. Yeah, all of those types of services. They're trying to separate those out. Replication. Well, the application. You know what I'm saying? Replication. Replication. Yes, so all those storage management and services that you would envision as invoking on a storage array using a controller-based capability. Right, there's two objectives they have. One of which is to separate those out. The second objective, they very clearly said, is to allow the capability of going through to that array and preserving some unique qualities about that array. So for example, if you needed a very high availability, very high performance, you might want to put in an extreme IO array there and use, specifically be able to use that for the set of services above it, but using that very high speed flash. Okay, so before we get into that, so we got the control plane, all the storage management functions. What about the data plane? Let's get specific. What are we talking about there? So we're talking about a data plane of any storage array is their objective, of being able to all storage arrays there. So NetApp storage array, Apache storage array. Well, the one's announced is the NetApp third party. In the future, there will be others, probably, even in the future, something like S3 from Amazon, being a storage resource which you can be managed from this array. A target, essentially. Yes, exactly. So essentially. And including, obviously, all of the EMC storage arrays. Okay, and the data plane, we're talking about controlling the physical placement of data at the back end storage device, or? So what you have from that data plane is the ability to abstract virtual servers from all the physical servers that are there. So you could, in theory, for example, break down an Isilon into a number of virtual servers or even expand across multiple arrays a virtual array across multiple arrays in the data plane. Okay, so before we get into who it's targeted at, so why is EMC doing this? Why extract function out of your controller, essentially rendering your hardware a commodity, and then sell software? Isn't that going to marginalize their existing business? Aren't there going to be performance problems? Why are they doing this? So in my view, the key thing they're looking to do is to preserve their relevance to the enterprise marketplace. And the enterprise marketplace is, sorry, the enterprise marketplace is moving, will move slowly to cloud service providers. So you think this is aimed at cloud service providers? Absolutely. They need to own a position in cloud service providers because, as I said today, for every cloud service provider that we lose, we will lose a thousand customers. So they have to compete in this space and provide a service for those cloud service providers for their long term value. They said that today? Okay, so clearly they see the cloud as a disruptive channel. So the appeal to a cloud service provider is what? They have one of everything, right? We know that about cloud service providers. They got EMC, they got NetApp, they got IBM, HP, Hitachi, Dell, you name it, they got it. Okay, so they've got all these assets on the floor. EMC's coming in with a software defined storage approach saying if I get this right, use our control plane to run anybody's storage or our storage. And I'm presuming they're saying if you run our storage it's going to be a little bit better. They didn't say that, but obviously if I was a salesman. You would think so. Well, but I mean, logically they should be able to integrate better. Well, yes, sure. But the more important thing is from the service providers they want to utilize the assets they have, whether it be commodity assets or specific array assets in the best way that they can. And separate out their provisioning of storage to applications and to their own applications from the storage itself. Make that two entirely different things. So that abstraction then allows them to grow as fast as they want to or with whatever storage they is the flavor of the month. That abstraction allows them to do that. So essentially, I mean I think about Amazon. Amazon is essentially an API to a data center. That's correct. So this is sort of an Amazon-like model in that sense that it's an API into a storage platform. Yep, a lot of the storage from all cloud services will be object-based. But the difference is that if you're Amazon you had to do it yourself. If you were Google you had to do it yourself. If you were Facebook you had to do it yourself. You had to create a one-off environment. If you look forward to most of the cloud service providers being much smaller, being around a particular application, a small ISV, they will not have the resources. They have to do it themselves at the moment. But they will not have the resources to do that. They won't want to do that long-term. So what EMC is saying is we'll provide that for you. We'll be the supplier of the platform on which you can build your particular ISV. Let me make sure I understand what you're saying. You're saying that the hyperscale guys got a zillion PhDs running around where they can figure this stuff out for themselves. They can essentially put resources on the problem to save money, whereas the enterprise doesn't have those people resources. They'd rather spend money. That's true, but here we're talking about the cloud service providers. So you're talking about them as being enterprise. So the target customer of the cloud service provider doesn't have as many resources clearly as Amazon and everybody else. So EMC is playing that role to provide those. That platform so they can layer in services on top and they can plug in whatever other, what, management constructs, cloud operations, cloud ops. Everything is APIs. They can plug in a new API for a new storage service or they can plug in a new API for a new type of storage at the back end. So they can integrate their cloud ops, cloud management systems with the EMC platform and control it, okay. Great, so now what do you make of this? Have they given any detail of the function? Where's the function come from? Are they pulling the best out of VMAX and VNX and BRS? Is it all homegrown from scratch? Is it 1.0 and there's no function there? What's your take? My initial take is there's very little that's actually been announced in detail about what is going on. It's also clear to me that their strategy is to take their file-based arrays as the base for this. So it's the Isilon type arrays as the base. And then from that extract a object storage based on those file storage arrays. In that way then they can get something to market quickly as a solution. Obviously the key challenge there is making sure that they can deliver the Isilon type of file storage at a low enough price. That's one of the key challenges for them. But that's, I think, where they will go initially for their own products. But equally they have to provide the APIs for commodity products as well. And the real competition here is the open stack and open compute foundations. Because if that gets to be the platform of choice and they go through only to commodity servers or things like Cinder there are some ability to go through to Isilon, they will lose out in the control of that place. Yeah, so Cinder for those who don't know is the open stack block storage offering, right? It's an open source with contributions initially by SolidFire and Swift is the object platform. And you said this ultimately will be object. So you're talking about an open interface, a restful interface. Well there'll be both of those. There'll be APIs to each of those. So there'll be APIs for example and that mask APIs to a open stack. They will include that as an API. They want to own fundamentally the control plane and let the market decide if you like what storage is best for what application. So they see that storage at the back end is getting commoditized and they're saying great. I've said this for a while now that storage companies have marked up Seagate disk drives, 10X for years. And they've gotten away with it because they say, well, we add value through the controller, which is true. But essentially people are like, okay, but I don't want to, how many times have you heard this? I can go to Fry's and get a terabyte drive for X. Yet I got to pay EMC or IBM or HP or whomever, tell X times. 10X, 15X times that. Okay, and there's a lot of frustration in that and that whole model is collapsing. EMC sees that, so they're saying let's extract the function. But where is that function coming from? You said there's not really that much announced. Where do you think it's coming from? Are they going to take the best of EMC and put it together? Are they going to sort of build it from scratch, a combination? They're going to take the best of, clearly. They need to take the best of isilon in some areas, the best of flash from all of those different things. They need to extract that and put that in as a layer. They will charge for those. It's not an open source, it's not free. This is not free software. They will charge what the market will bear. Plus that 10X market to disk drives, they're going to make it up in software-led infrastructure. Well they won't get away with quite the 10X but they will be competing against the open stacks and they will argue to the service providers, this is a much better service. We're ahead of open stack. We will put the resources in. Now whether they will win in that battle, time will tell but that's their strategy. Well so why would somebody want software, what we call software-led infrastructure of software-defined storage? I was just writing some things up. Faster application integration, better collaboration, potentially expands the TAM in a market that's under pressure. So by going, allowing other people's storage, sort of the, it's sort of a modern version of the, you know, the IBM Sand Volume Controller, right? Connections to the cloud, speed deployment, all those things. But from what you're saying, it's early days. This is a classic sort of pre-announcement. We're showing the direction. You know, we're going to. We're trying to stop open stack in its tracks. So this is a, we're going to freeze the market on some of the guys that have momentum. But also we, I'm speaking for you, you know, we better start appealing to developers. That's one of the things that I'm sure you saw at the open stack conference when you were there with theCUBE and John Furrier. You saw a lot of momentum in the developer community. And it seems to me, David, that this notion of the data center is an API or the storage platform, storage as a platform with an open API. However you define open, open I guess means you can get into it, right? And you can get out of it. Now open could also mean open source, like open stack. Right? This ain't open source. This is not open source though. Okay, that's not EMC's dealio. But nonetheless, in concept, it sounds like the right strategy. Even though it sounds like the execution is a ways off. I think that this strategy is correct for EMC. I think they're early out. They've brought in a great guy to head that. They, the. Yeah, we're going to have him on theCUBE later. I don't know, tomorrow, Wednesday, Amitabh Srivastava. It should be fascinating to. Yeah, and I can ask him all my Colombo questions and get answers to them. But this notion of how open is open is sort of an interesting one.  And let's see, let's pick an example. Let's pick your favorite UNIX box, interestingly enough. Because that means mainframe is more open than your favorite UNIX box probably today. But being a one, how open is this on that one to 10 scale? I, a three or a four. What they're controlling is the services and they're controlling the access to it and they're controlling the APIs. So they've got a big slice of that. What they are allowing those APIs to go through is to this lowest layer. But you know, where would you put the API emphasis on making it as robust and as fast as possible? Which API would you pick? Yeah, you're going to, all right. You're going to put it on the EMC products, right? No. So they will, they will. So okay, so this is essentially, again, EMC transforming its business model from one of middleware embedded into a controller to software led. But from, I mean, storage has never really been open. I mean, I think Sun tried to make open source storage and it flopped. And Oracle stopped it, yeah. Yeah, well, I think Sun stopped it itself because it just didn't make sense at the time. But open stack, obviously, has a lot of opportunity there. I mean, S3's not open. No, it's not. I mean, it's open in the sense that you got an API, but it's not open source, right?  Yeah, so it's an interesting strategy. I understand there's been some conversation on Twitter about this, oh, there's nothing there. But to me, what's interesting about this is yet again, you're seeing EMC say, all right, we're going to make a bold move. We're going to try to set the direction of the industry before somebody else does it. You're seeing pockets of software defined out there. Grid store, symbolic, guys like that. But as far as amongst the big wheel, so we got to watch EMC, IBM, HP, Oracle, I'll throw Dell in that mix. I guess throw Hitachi in there too. What are those guys doing in software-led infrastructure? Has anybody announced a more comprehensive approach than this, in your opinion, of the whales? No, I mean, the HP are supporting OpenStack very strongly. Yeah, so HP is OpenStack. OpenStack is HP's angle. Yes. So that's, so they're betting the farm on OpenStack for cloud. They're betting on the farm on OpenStack. In that sense, HP is participating with a more open, on a scale of one to 10, where's OpenStack's openness? It's a 10. Oh, it's a, it's a, it's a 11. It's a nine, a nine or a 10. I mean, it's right up there, absolutely. Okay, but functionally, HP, you know, Classic has not announced a comprehensive strategy along these lines. No, not at all. Nor has IBM, certainly Oracle hasn't. HP are certainly a major, Red Hat is another contributor to that. So Red Hat and HP. With the acquisition of Gloucester. Yes, thank you. Right, thank you. Gloucester, right, yes. So HP and Red Hat are major contributors to OpenStack and they, they buy, buy far and away the biggest contributors to that. So that's major, lots of money. So it's interesting to me because John Furrier, when OpenStack came out said, you know, hey, this is a Hail Mary against Amazon. And he was very supportive of, of the idea. And he obviously, we love open source here at SiliconANGLE Wikibon, but he said, look, this is a bit of a long shot. Well, judging from the OpenStack summit, the pass was connected. Yep. They're in the red zone. Yep. Right? And the EMC has responded. EMC clearly has seen that as the environment. But the other thing that Furrier said, you know, a while back was that in many respects, OpenStack is as much a competitor to VMware as it is to Amazon. That's an interesting observation. And I think this move by EMC underscores that. You said it before, you see this as a competitor to OpenStack, you know, going after the cloud service providers where most of the OpenStack deployments are in cloud service provider. Cloud service providers are an increasingly important channel as we see from not only Amazon, but people trying to compete with Amazon. There's just one thing. I mean, if you take platforms in general, it's rare for more than two to be the survivors at the end of the day. In the days of the PC, it was Microsoft and Intel, the duopoly that won and Apple just survived. Today in the mobile, it's Android and iOS. The two people have survived that. It's unlikely that anybody else is going to get into that already at this stage. What's interesting about this is one or two will survive and it's going to be interesting whether EMC is in that mix as well as OpenStack. You don't think there's more room? You don't think that given the fragmentation in storage, that HB... Not in the control plane. IBM... It's the control plane. If you make that and OpenStack doesn't say anything about who provides the storage. But you're saying if EMC is successful with making Viper the de facto control plane. Yeah, they could be a success. You're saying whoever could do that, whether it's EMC or IBM or HP or somebody else, whomever can create that de facto standard, you're saying could have Cisco-like share in the storage market. It consists of like share in the total IT hardware market. They would define both the hardware and the storage. And where would a FusionIO play in something like this? FusionIO is itself betting that people like OpenStack and Open Compute Foundation will be the winners in this and they will provide certain open platforms and software that will be taken up by those platforms as the de facto standards. So this is the future of storage in your opinion. It's hyperscale-like. It's a page out of Amazon and Google and Facebook. If you, again, as Furrier says, if you want to know what's happening in the enterprise five years from now, look what's happening at Amazon, Google and Facebook today. And you'll see it, and this is what they were doing five or six years ago. They can't afford to make each one of those their own. Right, and so that's the opportunity for IT suppliers to bring them in. What does this mean for CIOs? If this is the future of storage, what actions should CIOs be taking as a result of this? Well, initially wait and see. There's no action. Early, early days. Shake your hands, watch. Watch and see what happens. See who's going to be winning in this marketplace. If you have to make a decision, then you've got good products out there. OpenStack is good, but you have to invest a lot. If you find a solution, like, for example, the Icelon or whatever other flavor you have, which provides the APIs through to object and provides you with ability to provision for it, you need to make that decision now, then make it. But don't switch horses. It's too early in the race to switch horses or pick horses. What you're saying is an early glimpse to the future of the storage business and watch this space. All right, David Flore, thanks for helping us break down the Viper announcement. Conceptually, very powerful. Very powerful. In terms of what's there today, not very viable, is what I'm hearing, but zero viable, but very clever move by EMC to essentially put a stake in the ground. Good move, as you say, starts to make people rethink what they're doing with, for instance, OpenStack or other platforms and puts them on that curve. All right, everybody, David, thank you very much for coming on, appreciate the segment. Keep it right there. We'll be back after the keynotes with my co-host, John Furrier, to wrap this up. This is theCUBE, SiliconANGLE's production live from EMC World 2013. We'll see you in a little while.


The forward-reverse circuit uses a very specific type of starter. You're going to need a starter that has two coils, which will include a forward coil and a reverse coil. Now let's take a look at what the control schematic looks like. So here we have our basic forward-reverse control schematic. We have a forward coil and we have a reverse coil. The forward coil has some contacts associated with it. So we have a normally open contact that will close when this coil energizes and a normally closed contact that will open when this coil energizes. We also have a reverse coil, so that here is right there with the letter R and it will have two contacts associated with it as well. A normally closed contact that will open when it's energized and a normally open contact that will close when it's energized. Now you'll also notice that I have this dotted line linking the two forward and reverse. That is a mechanical interlock and its purpose is to make sure that the forward coil and the reverse coil do not pull in at the exact same time.  So you're going to have a mechanical interlock, which is necessary, which is why it's a very specific type of starter. We also have, because we definitely don't want those two pulling in at the same time, is these sets of contacts, these normally closed contacts. These are called the electrical interlocks. And so what will happen is when forward is energized, this will open, which will not allow anybody if they try to press this button down to energize the reverse coil. And vice versa, if this coil is energized, then the R opens. And we'll talk about that and show you a little bit more in depth as we walk through how the circuit works. So here I push down the forward button. Current can flow through and it can energize F. So F becomes energized. And when F becomes energized, these normally open contacts become closed and these normally open, closed contacts become open. So what will happen now is current can also flow through this. This is my holding circuit because what will happen is I will let go of this button. It will bounce back up and this part of the circuit here will hold it in. So there we go. The button's up. F is still energized because of this contact, which holds it in as well. Now let's talk about down here. Let's say that somebody wants to come along and push this button because they're not paying attention. We don't want this coil to pull in, but you notice that with F energized, this contact here, which was normally closed, is now open. So if we press this button down, nothing can get through. So here we have the button pressed down. This was normally open. Current is still flowing through here, keeping F going. Current can also come down here, go across here, but then it is blocked by this set of contacts that are now open and R cannot energize.  We push that down, that stops power from everything. So then F de-energizes and the circuit goes back to its normal state. Now to show you that the reverse is the same idea, current can flow down here, cannot go across there, cannot go across there, goes across, goes through the F normally closed contact, energizes R. R becomes energized, which means that the normally closed open contact here closes and holds in, as well as up here, R opens. As with the forward, when this button is up, this energizes still because we have the holding circuit engaged. Now let's just show if we press the F button that F will not engage. So again with R energized, if I go to push F down because I'm not paying attention, this locks me out. This normally open contact here, sorry this normally closed contact that is now open is open because this is energized. I cannot get any power through to my F, therefore I cannot have F and R energized at the same time. Now if something happened and R somehow closed or was the contacts were held closed for whatever reason, they welded shut and I've got this and that closed at the same time, this will prevent no matter what, if I have this go through, this tries to energize, this mechanical will hold it out. So what'll happen is like a little paddle, when this is energized it pushes on the paddle. So this one, even though it'll try to energize, it will be impossible for it to energize. So it's a redundant system to make sure that F and R do not energize at the same time. And then as before to stop the circuit, we just hit that stop button which is normally closed. It kills power to the whole circuit and everything goes back to its original state.


What's up everybody, Jason here for jaspyscasebrakes.com, jaspys five box through the years of contenders football mixture just sold out This is a random teams break number one and again guys 32 total spots Remember no veteran commonship in this but some huge potential in this mixer guys We're going all the way back to 2011 when it was Andy Dallin Julio Jones Cam Newton Mark Ingram AJ Green rookie year and we're gonna go to 2016 that would have been Dag Zeke Wentz Golf rookie year and we'll go to 2019 with Kyler Murray Daniel Jones DK Metcalf and That great class there as well, and then we'll go to 2018 Sorry 18 was first but 2018 Josh Allen Bigger Mayfield You know Sam Darrell Lamar Jackson say Kwame Barkley and then we'll end off with a brand new 2021 contenders With Tray Lanz Mack Jones Trevor Lawrence Justin Fields Zach Wilson Nausea Harris, etc. So actually a pretty fun mixture guys.  Here's the customer names again Timothy down to Brian Croft got those straight up And then from Chris Butler down to Nick won those in a pack filler So there you go. Let's roll it Three to three six times. Good luck one two three four five and six Joe Andreessen down to you Jose.  Well, I'll leave the trade window open in the meantime if you guys want to trade If not, we'll come back and rip it guys. So I'll pause the video All right, you guys welcome back We did have one trade guys one trade Ray and Benjamin Raiders for Vikings So let me print out the list and then we can start the break guys You guys have a plus sign now so Brian Croft has last bomb oh Joe But Ray you do have the plus sign there. You're not the Raiders and then Then you know how the Minnesota Vikings There you go. There's everybody else in the break Thank you guys. So remember this is a five box Contenders through the year mixer. So we're just gonna go as old as to the newest We'll start off with 2011 contenders playoff now if there is any redemption guys, which there could be Just remember they didn't really keep track of checklist with the player in the team next to it So we have to go through if you have to have any redemptions. We probably might have to Do by our college rules and stuff like that So hopefully we don't get any redemptions, but just look at why I don't the older stuff. It's kind of hard black golden tickets Especially for the players that we don't know like obviously, you know We know at the time these players were there, but it's more for like the other players that Might be like not even in the league after a year or two. I guess So I guess if they do give you a checklist of the players, which is cool but They don't really give you the team next to it and It says look for black golden tickets made of 14 karat gold a number to one Something they don't really do anymore So from here, we'll probably go to 2016 then 2018 2019 and then go to Here we go rookie ticket Christian ponder that's a lot right there Do you remember Christian ponder? Minnesota Vikings trade mojo already Benjamin there you go, and there's the redemption like I said It's not an obvious player then Don Maynard Superbowl one right there AJ Green rookie of the year contenders. It's a nice little one right there. Is that Casey Matthews?  He was really good Blaine Gabbard rookie of the year contenders Last one the pass right there Dilloni Carter and we have Greg Jones for the Giants So that's three tickets and make sure I don't miss any Could have missed one. I guess how many are supposed to be in here? Oh look for four autographs per box Okay, so we got it then So we got the three right here plus the redemption. I know fans Blaine Gabbard will use you as a little filler Spires in 2013 guys Good look car 220 So this didn't even tell you the name back then I think you had a little by the card numbers. All right. Let's see Where's car 220? Is there actual car 220? Yeah, there is Wow Look at that. That's actually von Miller Pardon, but I know it's kind of hard for you guys to see that but von Miller's car number 220. Wow Denver Broncos That's awesome. Well, I mean, I don't know if you're gonna get that but Something potentially Denver Broncos Jason that's cool. That was a kind of last will pass cool. All right Let's go with 2016 contenders and then right here by then I have five autographs Just missing shots on Anderson nice rookie ticket for the Jets Jets Jets Ben it with that one and then we'll probably do left right for these contenders at the end of the break They're all almost the same Paul Birkins number to 99 Good running back there. I think out of UCLA Giants that's going to Eric Von Bell rookie ticket For the Saints New Orleans Saints but a Chris Butler Cyrus Jones Shall we have one more ticket maybe Johnny Holton All right All right two boxes down three more to go We're gonna start getting to some more higher end boxes, especially this 2018 Hopefully we do a full big rookie Like I said, we'll do left right for those We have Rod Smith we have Jordan Thomas Houston Texans Well, there's Josh Allen rookie of the contenders Sam Hubbard We have playoff ticket Carlos Hyde How many tickets have we found this before? Only got in three so there's still at least two Calvin Ridley That's your rps ticket, which is not a bad one great receiver just had it off here It's meant to help issues and of course now that's suspended earlier for For gambling and there's the fifth one Cedric Wilson, that's not bad Out of 99 playoff ticket Cowboys that's uh, Josh All right, let's go to 2019 guys. Good luck Portland Sun Well, there goes Arizona. All right, there's no autographs on this side.  Did I just did I miss all that right now? There's no way There better be five autographs on this side then Devin Singletary. All right, we've got some points coming up 250 points for the Dolphins Patrick Lauer Stanley Morgan jr. There's four tickets the bangles kylan Saunders All right, so at the end guys, uh, we'll have to give away 250 points Number one other randomizer gets that unless there's of course more points All right, so we got one box left guys just brand new 2021 contenders Good luck. Find another five autographs here. Brandy moss tonight and I and legendary contenders numbered rookie Trevor Lawrence supernatural You got a redemption Patrick Sertain nice rookie ticket. That's not an rps Kylan Hill is growing it for the Rams Jay Tuffle All right, looks like the on looks like your on-card rps ticket's gonna be The redemption There one two three four. Yeah So this should be your on-card right here guys Good luck. Everybody last hit right here. Hopefully it's a good one rps ticket 117 pat for your mouth. That's for the pittsburgh stealers Ryan with that one All right, guys, and there you go. That was the break. So I got to topple it all this Not the craziest boxes, but we did see some nice names, especially some of the older stuff Cedric Wilson was nice. We got a Calvin Ridley Robbie Anderson rookie tickets Vaughn Miller was probably one of the nicest ones to be honest christian ponder Perkins So there you go guys, that was the mixer here. Let's randomize the customer names. I'll give away 250 points a little constellation for somebody Um, here we go. Let's copy and paste the names roll four to one five times one two three four five Craig there you go. I don't know if I called your name in Craig you had the Carolina Panthers so Something here for you, buddy All right, I appreciate it guys jasmizgaysbury.com next break coming up