It is now time for oral questions. My question is to the Minister of Finance, someone we are hoping is willing to answer the questions that the people of Ontario are asking. Yesterday the President and CEO of the Ontario Chamber of Commerce wrote to the Minister concerning the Government's proposal to rip up the contract with the beer store. In his words, breaking a legitimate contract is a short-sighted approach. Does the Minister agree or would he now characterize Chamber of Commerce members as beer insiders? Questions addressed to the Minister of Finance. Thank you. No where else in the world does a government give the biggest beer companies special privileges at the expense of consumers and at the expense of the industry. The three global beer giants are for profits, not for the people. Most people in the province of Ontario do not know, and I'll tell you, when I was first elected as an MPP, I did not know that the beer store was not owned by the government. Well it's not owned by the government, it is owned by three global beer giants who got a sweetheart deal from the Liberal government. The Liberal government put profits ahead of people, Speaker. That result is a lucrative deal for the beer store and their insiders. Supplementary question. Rocco Ross, he isn't just the President and CEO of the Chamber of Commerce, he's also a former PC candidate, who the Minister has enthusiastically quoted in this legislature. He's now joining the chorus of concerned citizens, telling the government that the hundreds of millions of dollars they plan to spend on their beer store scheme could be better invested in true services for the people of Ontario. Will the Minister reconsider these reckless plans? We campaigned on a promise to put the people first, including by growing jobs, expanding choice and expanding convenience for the people of Ontario. Our government is open for business and open for jobs, and since coming into office, over 170,000 net new jobs have been created across the province, and just last week, Fitch Bond Rating Agency gave us an upgrade. They're first they've done in eight years, and that came after we launched our legislation to bring choice and convenience to the people. The beer store knows that a government need not continue legislation from a previous government or continue with bad liberal deals. Special advisor Ken Hughes says the agreement, and I'm quoting here, stifles competition, keeps prices artificially high, and prevents new craft beer entrepreneurs from getting a strong foothold in the market. That's what the NDP wants to see, Premier Speaker. Final supplementary. Before governments started attacking people they believed to be their enemies, now they're alienating their friends. Not to mention the millions of Ontario families who want to see a government focus on better classrooms and ending hallway medicine. Instead, we have a government that's cutting those things while they tweet about plans to potentially blow hundreds of millions of dollars because they're breaking contracts. What kind of government claims to understand business and breaks contracts with companies? Youngtier, breaking a legitimate contract is a short-sighted approach. Will the government come to their senses and realize this and cancel that plan today? Minister Finance. Speaker, again, nowhere else in the world does a government give the biggest beer company special privileges at the expense of consumers and the rest of the industry. The three global beer giants are for profits, not for the people. You have to ask yourself, Speaker, why these multinational companies are so opposed to having the government help them sell more of their products in many stores. It's because of the lucrative deal, the sweetheart deal they've received from the previous Liberal government. They're ignoring the economic opportunity that's before us. 9,100 new jobs will be created and three and a half billion dollars added to our economy. The Ontario Chamber of Commerce should join us in supporting small businesses, supporting consumers and supporting our local brewers. Thank you very much. The next question is for the member for Brampton Centre. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Health. It seems the Premier is unwilling or unable to answer questions about this government's health care spending cuts, so I'll ask the Minister directly. Yesterday, the Minister dismissed a report from the Financial Accountability Office detailing the Ford government's health care cuts as accounting differences. Among the FAO's findings was that the government's budget would reduce health care spending by $2.7 billion. Can the Minister provide details of what will be cut? Thank you. Questions to the Minister of Health and the Interim Care? In fact, what we're doing is increasing our health care spending. We're spending $1.3 billion more on health care spending to mental health and addictions funding. We're providing a new program of $90 million for our dental programs for low-income seniors. We've provided $384 million in operational funding increases for hospitals. We are on the increase and we're modernizing our system, transforming our system in the process of it. The supplementary question. In the report, the FAO is clear. And I'll quote, we cannot disclose the $2.7 billion reduction in planned spending from the 2008 budget plan to the 2019 budget plan by program area, as the province has deemed this information to be a cabinet record. In other words, the Ford government is making deep cuts, but they won't tell us exactly what they're cutting. In my community of Brampton, our hospital has been struggling over capacity for decades now, with patients routinely being treated in hallways. Those patients want to know, where is this government planning to find $2.7 billion in health care spending cuts? Again, we are increasing spending, as I indicated before, by $1.3 billion across the king changes. We are modernizing our system. We want to make sure that our system becomes patient-focused, that people can achieve connected services when they go for health care services. We are going through the spending right now in estimates. I just started this morning, and the estimates committee, you're welcome to come by and listen to some of the explanations we are going through with specific questions from the official opposition about spending. Spending is increasing, not decreasing in health care. The final supplementary question. Speaker, the Minister of Health must know that this government is on the wrong track. As patient ombudsman, she heard from patients waiting in hallways, and nurses worried about the care that patients are receiving. She knows that $2.7 billion in health care cuts will have a devastating impact here in this province. But instead of standing up for patients, she's tweeting photos of herself being at convenience stores and promoting the Premier's billion-dollar beer boondoggle. Why is the minister refusing to disclose the details of the $2.7 billion health care cuts? Minister, welcome on to the bill. Again, it's very clear to the people in the committee, to the people of Ontario where the money is being spent. I am in estimates right now. I will be there for another six hours. If you have any questions, please come by and ask, because you are the members of your party are asking me questions about money that's being spent. It's very clear that it is an increase in spending, which you voted against. We are increasing spending and making our care services more connected for patients. I can certainly say through you, Mr. Speaker, to you that as patient ombudsman, what I did hear about on a daily basis was how disconnected people felt from their services. They felt that once they were discharged from hospital, they were left to their own devices. They had to find their own supports and services. Home care, long-term care was not connected. We are going to connect patients to the services they need throughout their healthcare journey. Thank you. Thank you. The next question, the member for Kiwetnolm. Good morning, Mr. Speaker. My question this morning is for the minister responsible for women's issues. The final report of the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls Commission released yesterday made 231 calls for justice. We thank the families for coming forward and sharing their truth-telling stories to improve the lives of Indigenous women and girls. Previous reports and commissions have made over 1200 recommendations, Mr. Speaker, to all levels of government to address the issue of violence against Indigenous women and girls. Mr. Speaker, how many of these recommendations has Ontario fully implemented? Questions addressed to the minister responsible for women's issues. I want to thank my colleague for raising this very important issue in the legislature today. One of the most emotional periods of my life, I think in public office, was sitting there yesterday as we accepted the report. I was pleased to be the only government representative there that actually walked to accept the recommendations with our Ontario regional chief, Roseanne Archibald, and it was very meaningful for me. A number of those recommendations we're working on. We're going to continue to work with our federal government to counterparts with respect to Bill C92 and Jordan's principle, and we're going to continue to ensure that we have a strong Indigenous-led voice within the Ministry of Children and Youth, community and social services with respect to women's issues as well. I look forward to working with the member opposite as he brings forward these very important issues. I will say this to those who may not have seen it, but standing there yesterday to watch the grandmother of Tina Fontaine, a young girl that was 15 years old when she was murdered in Manitoba, was probably one of the most poignant things I've ever seen speaker, and that is why this government under the premier forward is committed to ensuring that we support our Indigenous sisters. Order. Restart the clock. Supplementary question. I want to thank the member for answer, but we have to understand we've things up in this way for generations and generations, and now people live it on a daily basis. It's not enough to accept a report from the inquiry and say the government will listen. Indigenous people expect action and systemic change, Mr. Speaker. Changes such as cutting the Indigenous cultural fund, making mandatory Indigenous culture curriculum as an elective, and cutting the child advocate are not acts of positive systemic change, Mr. Speaker. These cuts impact Indigenous safety and the future of our people. Will the government commit to reversing these cuts as the first step in responding to the recommendations from yesterday, and also providing funding for prevention programs to counter violence against Indigenous women and girls, and provide support programs for those left behind? Minister to reply. Thanks very much. I want to, I appreciate the question. There's only a few times in this confederation, I think, when there's certain parliaments that sit where you actually witness a momentous occasion, such as the one that I was fortunate to yesterday, as we talked about the missing and murdered Indigenous women, as well as those from the LGBTQ plus community. Let me answer the member opposite this way. We're going to be invading an advocate for children and youth within the Ministry of Community and Social Services with responsibilities for children and women. We have a number of Indigenous-led children's aid societies in the province of Ontario I, of which I just signed off on a few weeks, so we're going to continue to collaborate with our Indigenous-led child welfare systems across the province, and I hope to grow them. I think that we have an opportunity there, and I think we have an opportunity to work with the federal government on Bill C-92, so long as they don't reduce our standards. Finally we have an Indigenous-led child welfare roundtable that will be created in the coming weeks, and I'm very excited about this, and I'll be making an announcement shortly. And just with respect to poverty reduction, we're taking social assistance reforms very seriously, and that is why we're consulting our First Nations. Speaker, this is an important issue that every member of this assembly and every person in the province of Ontario should be aware of. We must stand with our Indigenous sisters and LGBTQ-plus individuals as they confront systemic racism across the province and this country. Thank you. Member for Haldeman Norfolk. Thank you, Speaker. My question is for the Premier. The skilled trades are critical to our economy, yet so many jobs are going unfilled. I've heard from employers in my writing who are frustrated. Red tape, stifling regulation that the previous skilled trades framework created and the lack of action by the previous government to make life easier for those in the trades. So I'm so pleased to hear last week, the Premier, our Minister of Training Colleges and Universities announced our government's plan to modernize the trades. Tradespeople in my writing are excited to see a government finally taking the trade seriously. Can the Premier tell us more about how important this plan is for these people and how it will help Ontario open for business and open for jobs? Questions to the Premier? Well, through you, Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my all-star, and he's a real all-star, from Haldeman Norfolk. I was up in his area at a fish fry. I can tell you that people absolutely love him. But through you, Mr. Speaker, I'd like to thank the Minister of Training Colleges and Universities as well as their parliamentary assistant and the member from Northumberland, Peterborough South and a member for Durham for joining me at the Darlington Energy Complex. We had a great meeting there last Friday. And when we went through there, there was 14 different trades, Mr. Speaker, and all 14 absolutely loved us, loved what we're doing. Those are the people that we support. The frontline, hard-working tradespeople. And through our budget of 2019, we passed the modernizing the Skill Trades and Apprenticeship Act, which will reduce red tape for employers and apprentices, streamline services and delivery, and help promote the tremendous career opportunities that the skilled trades offer. And Mr. Speaker. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Supplementary question. Well, thank you very much, Premier. And it's great to hear that we're taking decisive action to improve skilled trades framework, ignored for 15 long years by the previous government. I'm disappointed the NDP would refuse to support our plan to reduce the burden on tradespeople. It's obviously it's clear our government's listening and our plan will cut red tape, promote careers, open up Ontario for jobs. Mr. Speaker, we do know that by 2021, one in five jobs will be in the skilled trades. Yet, we also know so many baby boomers are now retiring. I'm very proud our government recognizes this urgent need to fill the skills gap, open up well-paying, rewarding career pathways for young people. And the Premier. Question. Tell us more about our plan for the skilled trades. Again, the Premier. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. And I want to thank the member for the question again. Through you, Mr. Speaker, the member is absolutely right that our government is taking action to reduce the red tape and burdens on Ontario's skilled tradespeople. As part of our plan, Mr. Speaker, to put our skilled tradespeople first, our government is investing $18.1 million in pre-apprenticeship programs to help prepare hardworking Ontario's Ontarians for careers in the skilled trades, Mr. Speaker. We're also investing $12.2 million to support the Ontario Youth Apprenticeship Program to help students in grades 11 and 12, and they can experience the skilled trades while getting a credit for school. Mr. Speaker, by investing in jobs of today and tomorrow, our government is delivering on our promises to get Ontarians working and make Ontario open for business, open for jobs. Mr. Speaker, it's a shame that the NDP decided to vote against these measures. That would make life easier for the children. Thank you very much. Start the clock. The next question, the member for Davenport. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. This question is for the Minister of Education, given that the Premier seemed unable to answer it yesterday. Speaker, Emily Jenkins is a drama teacher at Perry Sound High School. She grew up in the community, and she came back to teach, which is a job she loves. But after 12 years, Emily has received notice that her job is now at risk, thanks to this government's cuts to education. She told the Perry Sound North Star that her family is already cutting back on groceries, curtailing expenses, considering all options, including selling their house. Mr. Speaker, Emily's story is sadly not unique, especially in her board, where 240 secondary teachers have been declared redundant, and only 37 are being brought back. Is the Minister really going to stand here again and claim that her cuts won't result in job losses? Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker, and I have to tell you this. I cannot believe that the member opposite, day in and day out, stands up and perpetuates nonsense. Because the fact of the matter was, I noted she very carefully worded her question because she knows full well that teachers across this province, as happens every year, are in the current process of being recalled. You know, let's take a look at this. 82 teachers with the Lampton Kent District School Board who were rumored to be out of work by next school year, and those rumours are continuing to be perpetuated by the member opposite. Guess what? All of them are being recalled. And the Lamford District School Board are very much pleased, and announcing through social media that 100% of their high school teachers will have a job in September. The school boards in Ontario that are choosing to work with us, putting students... Thank you, thank you. Thank you, Mr. Speaker, and believe me, I wish I didn't have to ask these questions every day either. Speaker, this Minister will try to blame everyone, but herself, for these painful cuts, it's real people and real families who have to deal with the impact. At least in Toronto at least, 90 child and youth workers, seven occupational therapists, 10 social workers, 14 speech-language pathologists, and four ABA facilitators were let go yesterday. At a time when we know youth mental health should be a priority, students are going to have to do without in-school supports. And at a time when more students on the autism spectrum will be losing funding and spending more time in our schools, there will be fewer qualified adults to support them. Speaker, will the Minister take an ounce of responsibility for this mess and scrap the cuts in our schools? Minister to reply. Thank you very much, Mr. Speaker. And you know, I find it very rich, coming from the member opposite. She is a former member of the Toronto District School Board. And she knows full well, she knows how to is, this is an exercise that happens year-in and year-out. And the reality is, we're investing $700 million more in education and completely preposterous, the matter in which they're continually saying, the sky is falling. Let's talk about what we're doing. We're increasing awareness and exposure to technology and skilled trades, like the Premier referenced earlier. We're increasing funding for financial literacy. We're increasing funding for math. We're increasing funding for special needs. Speaker, the list goes on and on. And finally, Ontario has a government that believes in education and we're... Thank you. The general noise level in the House seems to be increasing during questions and answers. And I would ask the members to please come to order to allow us to have a reasonable question period today. Start the clock. The next question. The member for Don Valley East. My question is to the Attorney General. Recently, Legal Aid has seen their budget cut by over 30%, which has been described by many Ontarians as simply cruel. Minister, vulnerable Ontarians rely on access to Legal Aid and the services that it provides. In fact, Minister, when I was 15 years old, my family relied on Legal Aid when we were sent an eviction notice. If it wasn't for the Flemington Park Legal Clinic, my single mother and my two brothers may have ended up on the street. Minister, these services protect families. Yet, in response to the blowback by the cuts and the chaos it's caused, the Premier has confirmed that he will guarantee anyone in this province Legal Aid. I want to know, with these cuts, Mr Speaker, how will the Attorney General assure that every Ontarian has access to Legal Aid? Thank you. Questions addressed to the Attorney General? Thank you, Mr Speaker, and I thank the member opposite for the question. Ontario has the most comprehensive Legal Aid system in the entire country, and the Ontario government funds Legal Aid up to the amount of almost $433 million. I am very pleased that Legal Aid has been working closely with my ministry to ensure that frontline services will be available to those who need it. Families like your family who needed legal representation were able to go to Legal Aid, and those services will still be available, Mr Speaker. We are working very closely with them, and we're very pleased to report that they will be able to do it. The previous government spent almost $100 million more on Legal Aid over the last few years, and Ontario taxpayers and the clients who rely on Legal Aid services did not see an increase in the services as they should have expected, given that level of increase in financing. Some lawyers may not welcome renewed accountability at Legal Aid, Mr Speaker, but they're taxpayers of Ontario and the clients who rely on Legal Aid will. Thank you very much, Mr Speaker. Not all Ontarians have the ability to go out and just hire a lawyer. Legal Aid is about ensuring that the government supports the most vulnerable. It's about ensuring that all Ontarians have the opportunity to defend themselves in court. Now, there are rumors out there that the Attorney General plans to import a US-style public defender system here in Ontario. Mr Speaker, will the Attorney General confirm on whether she does, in fact, plan to move towards this American-style system? Again, the Attorney General to reply. Thank you, Mr Speaker. I'm not sure where the member opposite is getting his information. I'm working hard on reforming Legal Aid to ensure that it's sustainable and providing Legal Aid services to the most vulnerable in our society, as it has been doing now for a very long time. Our government's priority is to protecting what matters most, Mr Speaker. Healthcare and education and legal representation for those who can't afford to pay for legal representation themselves. Legal Aid is working very closely with my ministry to ensure that the frontline services that people need are there for them when they need them, Mr Speaker. But we will do it in a sustainable way. We're working closely with clinics, with legal aid, with lawyers who provide Legal Aid to ensure that they are able to provide the work that they have been doing now for some time. Mr Speaker, we are able to do that in a sustainable way. And rumors about other systems coming into Ontario to provide Legal Aid in a different way are unfounded. The next question is for the member for Etobicole, Lake Shore. Thank you, Mr Speaker. Question is for the Minister of Transportation. Recently, the minister introduced a comprehensive piece of legislation that getting Ontario moving act. If passed, this legislation will include our proposed measures to cut red tape, save businesses and taxpayers time and money and help keep Ontario's roads amongst the safest in North America. This legislation would also kick start our government's plan to build more transit that will connect more people to new opportunities. In my writing of Etobicole, Lake Shore, the premier unveiled our government's bold and historic vision for transit, a plan for the 21st century, a 28.5 billion transit vision to expand the provinces subway network by 50% and get millions of communers moving again. We are making life easier for people and businesses in the province by delivering simpler, faster and better government services. Question. Can the minister update the legislature on getting Ontario moving act? Question is to the Minister of Transportation. Thanks very much, Speaker. And I appreciate the work the member from Etobicole, Lake Shore has done in the last 11 months, almost 12 months this Friday. She's been quite an advocate for transit but has been wonderful to work with and I continue, hopefully, to be working with her. Mr. Speaker, she's right. Today we will vote on third reading of Bill 107 which is a very important piece of legislation. The proposed legislation, if passed, will cut red tape for job creators. They will reduce burdens so that businesses, job creators, can get doing what they do best and that's creating jobs for the people of this province. Mr. Speaker, simply put, we want to transform how the MTO interacts with businesses and people across this province. Despite all the great things this legislation would do, the NDP keep voting against this piece of legislation. And I'm hoping today, I hope they take a look at themselves and look at how great this legislation is. Stand up for the interests of Ontarians and vote to support this legislation. This bill is cutting red tape, reducing regulatory burdens in Ontario and is getting- Thank you. Thank you very much. It's a supplementary question. Thank you, Mr. Speaker and thank you to the Minister of Transportation for that great response. I look forward to third reading vote today and I hope, too, the opposition does the right thing and votes to get Ontario moving. We have a plan to finally get subways built after 15 long years of barely any action on the part of the previous Liberal Government. The proposed Ontario line alone will provide real relief from congestion on line one. It will be twice as long as and move twice as many people as the original relief line project and we'll get it done at about the same cost. We know that we can get these subways built before 2029 and that's the target that was set by the city and we're going to deliver it by 2027. Can the Minister of Transportation tell us more about the benefits of the Ontario line? Again, the Minister of Transportation. Thank you again, Mr. Speaker, for that question. Simply put, the Ontario line will provide relief that is desperately needed. People are tired of crowded platforms and watching three full trains go by before they can get on with their commute. This is something that everybody wants and it's time the opposition and the Liberal stood up and voted for the legislation that's going to get subways built in this province, Mr. Speaker. These subways are going to be built in their own writings on the opposite side, Mr. Speaker. It makes no sense for those members to vote against it so I'm hoping members from the Parkdale Hyde Park and Davenport and Spadina and Rosedale and Toronto Centre and Toronto Danforth Beaches East York, Don Valley East and West. I hope they take the moment and look after their own constituents and vote for the needed relief that's needed on our subway system today. I hope, Mr. Speaker, we're going to go forward and build this project. The City of Toronto is going to be with us, Mr. Speaker. Why won't the opposition help us on this issue? The House will come to order. Restart the clock. The next question. The member for University, Rosedale. Thank you, Speaker. My question is to the Minister of Transportation. Mr. Speaker, since early April, the government has been talking up their transit plan as if it was a done deal, not a few lines drawn in the back of a napkin. Now the Premier has gone hat in hand to the federal government for the Ontario line, even though the minister himself admitted yesterday that the business case still isn't complete. The feds aren't buying it. They said they need to see real estimates and concrete plans before they consider handing over a single dollar. Mr. Speaker, did the minister really expect anyone to fund his back of the napkin plan when basic details, like where stations will be and how much the line will cost, are still unknown? The question is to the Minister of Transportation. Thanks very much, Mr. Speaker. And I appreciate the question from other side. You know, we made a historic announcement in this province of $28.5 billion to finally build transit as much needed in this city and in the GTHA. We're building the Ontario line, Mr. Speaker, to bring much needed relief to the line one. We are going to extend the Young Subway into Richmond Hill and Markham. We're going to build the Edmonton into Etobicoke towards the airport, Mr. Speaker. And finally, after years and decades of waiting, Scarborough is going to get to the three-stop subway system, Mr. Speaker. But yesterday, Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Infrastructure myself had an announcement and a request for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau just to treat us the same as other provinces and give us a conditional approval for the infrastructure funding, much like they did to British Columbia in 2017. The Prime Minister in his own budget announced funding for a project that wasn't even supported by the province, not even supported by the city. But eventually, a year later, it was supported. They got the business case. All we're asking is equal treatment. I don't know why the member opposite is against building subways in this city and the GTHA. I don't know why Prime Minister Trudeau isn't stepping forward and helping support. Thank you. The supplementary question. Stop the clock. Restart the clock. The supplementary question. Okay, back to the Minister of Transportation. So this government now claims they want to work together with other levels of government when it comes to transit. Now that's a bit rich, coming from a premier who's undercut the city of Toronto every step of the way in their hostile takeover of the subway system. And your reputation is starting to get around. The federal government isn't too eager to jump on board with the government that, in their words, cuts first and thinks later. Mr. Speaker, how does the minister expect Ontarians to trust this government with large infrastructure projects like public transit when they can't even play nice with our federal and municipal partners? Minister of Infrastructure. Referred to the Minister of Infrastructure. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. Let me make it perfectly clear. We will take no advice when it comes to infrastructure from job to job. From Justin Trudeau opposition from the local government. In fact, Mr. Speaker. I need to be able to hear the Minister of Infrastructure reply. I would ask the opposition to come to order. Minister of Infrastructure. Mr. Speaker, we have forwarded to the federal government 54 projects for funding. That includes 49 projects in rural and northern communities across the province. And as the Minister of Transportation said, five major transit projects inside of the GTHA. We would expect all members in this house to stand up for Ontario. Justin Trudeau. Response. Treat Ontario like he treats every other province in the country. And Mr. Speaker, like the Minister of Transportation said, the federal government announced their support for Metro Vancouver before City Council supported it and before the process. Thank you. Thank you very much. Question. Member for Lanark, Frontenac, Kingston. Speaker, my question is to the Minister of Finance. It is a fundamental aspect of budgeting that one must first accurately compile all the approved program spending through detailed estimates from each ministry. These are then rolled up and aggregated for each ministry and for the government's total budget. The estimates or detailed spending are then tabled and are forwarded upon in committee and referred back to the House. I know this is the Finance Minister's first time tabling a budget and the first time tabling detailed estimates. My question, Speaker, is, is the Minister confident that the budget is accurate and without significant errors or omissions or is it possible that he got the cart before the horse? The question is to the Minister of Finance. Well, thank you very much. I can tell you that we're very proud of the budget that we not only presented but the proud of the budget that this government has passed. It's all about protecting what matters most and that includes healthcare, education and social services and the services that our people in Ontario look forward to receiving on a daily basis. And that is why we have seen an addition of $1.3 billion increase into the health budget. We've seen a $700 million increase into the education budget. Speaker, I've said this many times in this legislature. I simply cannot, I just do not fundamentally understand how the NDP can vote against $90 million for 100,000 seniors for free dental care. I simply do not understand why they won't support us. The member for Essex, the member for Essex come to order. Supplementary question. Again to the Minister of Finance. On March 26th, before the release of the budget, the Minister of Children, Community and Social Services stated and I quote, under the Ontario Progressive Conservative Party, autism funding this fiscal year will be over $600 million. However, her ministry is only seeking approval for $331 million, which is cabled into provincial estimates under vote 702. Speaker, one of three things must be happening. One, the Minister of Social Services is out of the loop and leaving families of autistic children eukered. Two, there is a hidden deficit of nearly $300 million. Or three, the government will secretly use a Treasury Board order to defund other approved programs and services to fill the gap. Speaker, I'd like to have the Minister answer which of the three it is. The Minister of Finance to reply. Thank you very much, Speaker. We have been perfectly clear the budget that was passed by this government is. The opposition must come to order. The independence must come to order. The minister can reply. Thank you, Speaker. We have made ourselves perfectly clear the budget is fully costed and all efficiencies and all value for money initiatives have all been accounted for, Speaker. Budget 2019 lays out our comprehensive plan and will continue to roll out a responsible path to balance over the months and the years ahead. Speaker, our plan response people ahead of everything. We put people at the center of everything we do and we will continue our path to balance and protect our frontline services. Question the member for Markham Thornhill. Here goggles off. Mr Speaker, my question is to the Minister of Transportation. Our government campaign on a promise to make a life easier for Ontarian by improving transit, reducing congestion and carrying people to home and work faster. Leaving them more time, what matters more? I know we have moved quickly over the last 10 months to increase code train service for people throughout the region. This includes the largest increases in code rail services in five years on the lakes or east and the lakes or west line. More service on the kitchen line and here on weekdays commuter rail service to Niagara Falls and St. Catherine's. Mr Speaker, can the Minister of Transportation update the House on our code train services in the region? The question is to the Minister of Transportation. Thanks very much Speaker and I think the member from Markham Thornhill and he is, no he's working hard to build that extended subway system forward Mr Speaker and as part of the 2019 budget we announced our commitment to move ahead with the Go Rail expansion program to improve and expand GO train service. Just last week the Minister of Infrastructure and my parliamentary assistant King of Surma were on hand to announce that our government is delivering on our promise by moving forward with the next stage of the Go Rail expansion program and announcing the pre-qualified teams that will be bidding on the On Corridor works project. The four teams were selected based on their experience, ability to design, build, finance, operate and maintain a project of this spot complexity on transit, MTR, on core transit and on express transportation partners are the groups that are bidding Mr Speaker we want to create a more integrated seamless system and that's what this project is going to do. Thank you supplementary question. Thank you Mr Speaker thank you Minister for that great answer. It is encouraging to know that our government is putting the people of our province first by moving ahead with the Go Rail expansion program. Four years this province has been plagued by congestion and lack of vital transit infrastructure. With this announcement our government is showing that we are committed to carrying its right carrying this province moving. Mr Speaker carrying it right means having the right tool for the job ensuring this project is delivered on time delivered on budget will be vital to its success. Can the minister tell us more about how our government is going to carrying this project going. Thank you Minister transportation. Minister of infrastructure. The minister of infrastructure. Thank you to the member opposite for that excellent question and his for his leadership Mr Speaker congestion in the GTHA is an 11 billion dollar problem. This is has a real impact on people's lives. Last week I was excited to announce with the minister of transportation that our government has launched requests for proposals for the largest transit public private partnership in Canada's history. Mr Speaker we ask the private sector for their best and most innovative solution to a simple challenge move people from point A to point B within a certain timeframe. This project means faster trains increase ridership and lower maintenance. It will make traveling across the GTHA faster easier and more seamless. Partnering with the private sector to deliver this project will minimize construction delays and financial risks to taxpayers. This allows us to protect frontline services and programs that matter to people. Mr Speaker we're open for business and we're putting Ontario back on track. Thank you very much Mr Speaker my question is for the minister of children community and social services. Today we released a report outlining what we have been hearing from parents since the government introduced its devastating autism program and frankly it's what we heard under the liberal program as well. Across this province we heard that parents aren't getting the help that they need and they don't trust this government to deliver the program that they deserve. That's why we are calling for an all-party arms length select committee to transparently design and implement a new autism program that will work for families. This is a chance for the government to take the politics out of autism. Will the minister agree to our call and strike a non-partisan select committee? Questions to the minister of children community and social services? Thanks very much Speaker my pleasure to respond to the member opposite obviously I'm very excited that we appointed last week a non-partisan advisory panel to the ministry with that and I'm looking forward to receiving the report from the new democrats I have yet to receive it I'm pleased that members of all parties in this assembly including the green party the liberal party as well as the new democrats including members of the progressive conservative government have had round table consultations I'm happy to provide that to the chair of the boarder who is a Dr Marie Boutriana a former liberal cabinet minister I'm also excited that we had a number of telephone town halls as well as online surveys where over 4000 Ontarians were able to contribute their views their values and their thoughts but speaker I think that we we must take the politics out of this which is why I appointed not only a liberal MPP former liberal MPP response but a number of my own personal critics so that we could get this right for the children of the province of Ontario with an unprecedented fund of over 600 million dollars start the clock supplementary question speaker it wasn't very long ago that this government was calling frustrated parents professional protesters the same parents who were told by the conservatives that they wouldn't have to protest on the lawns of queen's park under their government these parents have tried and tried to have their voices heard only to be stifled by tightly controlled telephone town halls and invite only community meetings families have lost their trust in this government and this minister to do the right thing by their children that's why we're asking for a non-partisan arms length select committee to oversee the implementation of the new autism program it's time this government introduced some transparency and fairness into the way that it delivers programs will this minister get the politics and secrecy out of autism and strike this committee minister to reply I'm very disappointed with the member opposite who continues to bring partisanship into this issue and unprecedented 600 opposition come to order will be invested this year into the Ontario autism program more children are receiving service than ever before in the province and we have now put forward a select committee at its expert advisory panel by a rabid conservative partisan that we know as Dr. Marie Boutriani a former liberal cabinet minister and those Lisa McLeod sick of fans at on TABA and the OAC the reality is we decided to take the partisanship and the politics out of this add an unprecedented amount of money so that we can support every single child in the province of Ontario with autism but you know what speaker what frustrates me day in and day out on this file is the irresponsibility of the member opposite the fear-mongering by the leader must come to order member for Hamilton mountain must come to order the house will come to order the member for Ottawa West Nippian is anxiously and patiently awaiting the opportunity to ask his questions start the clock the member for Ottawa West Nippian thank you Mr. Speaker discard the minister of economic development job creation and trade last week the minister announced changes to the Ontario interactive digital media tax credit our government is cutting red tape and leveling the playing field for small and medium interactive digital media companies across this province in 2016 Ontario's interactive digital media industry employed almost 20,000 people members of interactive Ontario the association representing companies in the sector say they plan to hire thousands of new people over the next year including in Ottawa's West End could the minister please outline for the house how our government is working to create an environment where interactive digital media companies can grow and thrive the minister of economic development thanks very much Mr. Speaker I want to thank the diligent member from Ottawa West Nippian for that great question this morning and it was a pleasure to visit last week with you can games here in Toronto for an important announcement that we made it was great to speak with business leaders in the interactive digital media sector here in Ontario where they have an impact of three billion dollars in that sector for our economy these companies are working on everything from video game speaker to digital marking marketing solutions for some of the world's largest companies the video game industry has come a long way speaker since your donkey Kong days it's really really big business Jean Sylvain Sormany is the president of Snowden Studios a developer in West Ottawa where the member is from and he said I think this is great and we do too Mr. Speaker it's a great change small and medium businesses make up 85 percent of this space with our changes to the digital media tax credit those companies are going to face less red tape when they're accessing this important support as the member opposite says thousands and thousands of jobs in Ontario are depending on us and we're coming through to create even more thank you very much that's your question thank you Mr. Speaker I appreciate the minister's response it's always good news for our province anytime we can remove red tape for Ontario's businesses I am pleased to hear the steps our government is taking to help our smaller video game developers to grow and thrive here at home in Ontario through strategic investments we can ensure that Ontario is a leader in this field and create jobs and keep jobs in this province for years to come through you Mr. Speaker can the minister please advise the House further on how our government is creating an environment in the media sector where we can attract investment and create jobs growth and long-term prosperity Minister Speaker I know the Minister of Tourism, Culture and Sport would like to answer this question refer to the Minister of Tourism Culture and Sport thank you Mr. Speaker and thank you for the opportunity to answer that important question and also for the great work that you do out in your constituency Mr. Speaker I'd like to commend also the Honourable Minister of Economic Development job creation and trade for the great work he's doing to bring jobs to the province of Ontario we have tax credits across the media landscape Mr. Speaker for film, television, music, books and of course video games these tax credits are distributed through a provincial agency called Ontario Creates these tax credits Mr. Speaker are used for the industries to simply allow them to access funds to be able to do great more work in the province Mr. Speaker that's why we're committed to cutting red tape for video game developers striking film and television advisory panel for those tax credits to ensure we're supporting job creation thank you very much thank you the next question the member for London Fans Sean thank you Speaker I've this morning I've received a media release from London Health Sciences Centre and I'd like to have a page delivered to the Minister in case she hasn't seen it and this is my question to the Minister of Health this morning London Health Sciences Centre announced their budget plans this year and it's not good they will need to make 28 million in cuts equal to 2% of their total budget and they have asked all the departments to find between two and two and a half percent of cuts to their budgets does the Minister still stand by her statement that she is not cutting healthcare the answer is yes we are actually investing as I indicated earlier $1.3 billion more into health care this year we're investing in the front lines of our health care system with an extra $384 million for hospitals operational costs this year and this includes a $12 million increase in base funding for London Health Sciences Centre in 2019 our government also announced a $1.2 million investment for London Health Sciences Centre in the fall to help that hospital deal with increases during flu season we also invested over $8 million as part of our government's larger commitment to upgrade repair and maintain hospital facilities across the province together these investments will allow able response all hospitals specifically London Health Sciences Centre to deal with the increases that they are experiencing supplementary question in order to achieve 28 million in cuts London Health Sciences Centre is forced to reduce staffing hours equivalent to 1.6 percent of their workforce to start there will be a hiring freeze of non-clinical staff natural attrition and non-union voluntary exits but London Health Sciences clear this is only their goal and the exact number of layoffs will be unknown for some time how do budget cuts and layoffs help to end hallway medicine does the minister still stand by her statement that there will be no layoffs of frontline health care workers on her watch hospitals are independent corporations that are run by their own boards of directors and as such they're making their own decisions with respect to how they're going to deal with their operational pressures but I would say that we understand that the hospital is working to mitigate the effect on staff by implementing temporary hiring freezes of non-clinical staff through natural attrition and non-union voluntary exits so I understand the hospital is doing whatever they can do to minimize the effects in terms of job losses but they make their own decisions with their own board of directors but we will as a ministry continue to work with the hospital to ensure that they can get through the next period of time with the additional help that we have already provided them with in monetary terms thank you the next question the member for Barry Innisville thank you Mr. Speaker my question to the minister of children community and social services after more than three years of collecting testimony from canadians through community meetings town halls held across the country the commission of the national inquiry into missing and murdered indigenous women and girls delivered its final report yesterday this report contains testimony from over 2,300 family members survivors experts and knowledge keepers collected from heartfelt and often emotional public hearings Speaker the minister was in Ottawa yesterday to receive the report on behalf of our government can she please tell us the significance of the final report of the national inquiry into missing and murdered indigenous women and girls the minister children community and social services thank the member from Barry Innisville for her strong leadership in defending defending all vulnerable women in the province of Ontario and for bringing this important question to the floor of the legislature today I really do appreciate it because it is important that every member in this assembly understand what took place yesterday in our country and right here in the province of Ontario I was proud as I mentioned earlier to represent Ontario yesterday and also to be the only level of government the only provincial government to bring alongside our Ontario regional chief Roseanne Archibald to receive the report alongside me I felt that that was important speaker not only as a gesture but as the next step after the missing and murdered indigenous women and girls report was tabled the prevalence of violence against indigenous women and girls in Canada is entirely unacceptable response that is why this government is committed to supporting vulnerable women particularly in our indigenous communities so that we can ensure their safety their security and their thank you very much supplementary question thank you for you Mr. Speaker thank you to the minister for accepting this report on behalf of our government and standing up for indigenous women and girls and encouraging all Ontarians both men and women to stand up against violence against women and girls speaker this report highlights statistics that show indigenous women and girls in Canada are 12 times more likely to experience violence than non-indigenous women during their lifetime and demonstrates through testimony how issues such as sex trafficking exploitation are affecting young girls in our communities this high prevalence of violence against indigenous women and girls in Canada is entirely unacceptable can the minister please share with us the steps our government is taking to combat violence against indigenous women and girls across this province good question minister I take the issue of sex trafficking very seriously that's why later today I'll be meeting with a number of survivors so that we can move forward on protecting women in a in a much more effective way across the province Fonterra including our indigenous sisters the ministry will continue working with First Nations and we made T partners to support the delivery of culturally appropriate child welfare services as well that's extremely important to us Ontario has signed relationship agreements with three First Nations political territory organizations in relation relation to child and youth well-being we have 12 indigenous children's aid societies right now who deliver culturally appropriate care in the province of Ontario and these agreements and others in development demonstrate our shared commitment as a province to working together to improve outcomes and opportunities for First Nations women and girls and speaker I believe every single member of this assembly stands committed in ensuring that we protect indigenous thank you very much my question is for the minister of health and long-term care London is facing one of the most severe opioid crisis overdose crisis in the country last April five Londoners died in a single week it was heartbreaking news that we received yesterday that the government abruptly pulled Milisex London health units funding application for a supervised consumption site on York Street and did not even provide a reason why Speaker the Premier doesn't get to decide the site's location London City Council does and yet this government once again takes its cues from wealthy insider friends and lobbyists including Amir Farahi and Blackridge Strategy there are deep connections between Blackridge strategy and the Premier's own office staff lobbyists pushed out of the York Street site cancelled and sure enough that's what happened this is another example of the Premier cutting deals in back rooms and meddling in municipal affairs while vulnerable people pay the price will the minister put the needs of Londoners ahead of the Premier's friends and immediately fund the York Street supervised consumption site Well I thank you for the question but the premise is entirely incorrect what I will tell you is that a selection site has been made for King Street that was made on the same criteria that all applicants are treated to the the all applications are evaluated against the exact same criteria proximity to other sites services and community support ongoing community consultation integration with primary care treatment and other public health services defined pathways to addictions treatment and rehabilitation primary care mental health housing employment and other health and social services that is a criteria that has been applied to all of the other applicants that have been approved the other 15 sites across the province of Ontario London is no different the King Street site has been chosen as the applicant as the site that's going to be providing those treatment and services there's no question that London needs those services and they are going to be provided at the King Street site concludes our question period for this morning the Minister of Natural Resources and Forestry has informed me that he has a point of order pleased to welcome to Queen's Park today Pramila Balasubramanian who is the mother of Paige Aryan Harshith from my riding of rent through Nipissing Pembroke Pramila welcome to Queen's Park legally member for Scarborough Guildwood may have a point of order point of order speaker I would also like to welcome back to the legislature Gwen Chapman of the Canadian Black Caucus who is leading a delegation of young people here today along with Nadine Spencer the president of the BBPA and many other leaders from the black community and it's also my pleasure to welcome College La Cité de Toronto and Amy McDonnell Ilungua Basui Sabine Somair Bessie Yeo and Sebastian Lapierre bienvenue Member for Toronto St. Paul's has a point of order I just want to invite all the members in the House to join us at the bottom of the stairs for a photo for world eating disorders action day after question period thank you Member for Toronto Center point of order Thank you Speaker I just wanted to take a quick moment and share with the legislature that my city Councillor in Toronto Center Christian Wong Tam who I know many of you probably know her and her wife Farah welcome to their brand new baby into the world yesterday so we wanted to say a congratulation and welcome to baby Keon thank you Before we move to the votes I wish to remind all members that tomorrow after question period we are going to be having the official photograph of the 42nd parliament take place so I hope you will all be here for that We have a deferred vote on government notice of motion number 65 relating to the allocation of time on bill 115 an act to amend the liquor control act with respect to the termination of a specified agreement call in the members this is a five minute bell we're going to ask the members to please take their seats on June the 3rd 2019 Mr. Yakibusky moved government notice of motion number 65 relating to allocation of time on bill 115 all those in favor of the motion will please rise one at a time and be recognized by the clerk Mr. Smith may have 20 Mr. Smith may have 20 Mr. Wong Mr. Wong Mr. Tom Mr. Tom Mr. Beth and Fall Mr. Beth and Fall Mr. Fidelli Mr. Fidelli Mr. Ford Mr. Ford Mr. Elliott Mr. Elliott Mr. Yure Mr. Yure Mr. McLeod Mr. McLeod Mr. Clark Mr. Clark Mr. Yacobusky Mr. Yacobusky Mr. Harderman Mr. Harderman Mr. Tobola Mr. Tobola Mr. Barrie Mr. Barrie Mr. Pettipy Paddyהו Thisis Marto Mr. Marteau Mr. M является Mr. Bailey Mr. Bailey Itsari McNot Mr. Mcnot Mrs. Fullerton mr. Fullerton Mr.精ha Ms. Minus. Ms. Park. Ms. McEnna. Ms. McKenna. Ms. Nickles. Ms. Custendova. Mr. Hormano. Mr. Harax. Ms. Gerrara. Ms. Gamari. Ms. Hogar. Ms. Hogara. Ms. Carahaleo. Ms. Fizfs. Ms. Fizfs. Mr. Joe Willardelle. Mr. Joe Willardelle. Mr. Crawford. Mr. Crawford. Ms. Canjan. Ms. Canjan. Mr. Puccini. Mr. Cran. Mr. Cran. Ms. Y. Ms. Y. Ms. Tanggir. Ms. Tangre. Ms. Tgangir. Smith, Peterborough, Coors, Mr. Baum, Mr. Guzzetto, Ms. Dunlop, Mr. Canapazzo, Mr. Babikius, Mr. Babber, Mr. Pang, Mr. Pangs, Mr. Roberts, Mr. Sabawi, Mr. Sabawi. Although the post of the motion will please rise one at a time and be recognized by the clerk. Mr. Shibison, Ms. Angelo, Mr. Tavins, Ms. Singh Branson-Senor, Mr. Vanta, Ms. Horvath, Ms. Horvath, Mr. Nanashek, Ms. Fife, Ms. Fife, Ms. Sattler, Ms. Shaw, Ms. Shaw, Mr. Mamakwa, Mr. Yard, Ms. Carpoche, Ms. Lindo, Ms. Lindo, Ms. Armstrong, Ms. Armstrong, Ms. Stiles, Mr. Kernahan, Mr. Kernahan, Mr. West, Mr. West, Ms. Stevens, Mr. Gates, Ms. Gretzky, Ms. French, Mr. Miller-Hamilton-East Stony Creek, Mr. Singh Branton-East, Ms. Andrew, Ms. Hathfield, Ms. Taylor, Ms. Taylor, Mr. Arthur, Mr. Arthur, Ms. Sherburne-Glann, Ms. Bell, Mr. Glover, Ms. Morrison, Ms. Morrison, Mr. Rikoseve, Ms. Monties-Farrell, Mr. Hassan, Mr. Hassan, Mr. Fraser, Ms. Wynne, Ms. Wynne, Mr. Coteau, Mr. Coteau, Madam Lalonde, Mr. Hunter, Ms. Hunter, Mr. Schreiner, Mr. Hillier, Mr. Hillier. The ayes are 68, the nays are 42. The ayes are 68, and the nays are 42. I declare the motion carried. We have a deferred vote on Government Notice of Motion Number 66, relating to the allocation of time on Bill 117, an act to amend the Ontario Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. Call in the members. This will be another five-minute bell. Same vote. Call on the member. 2019, Mr. Walker moved Government Notice of Motion Number 66, relating to allocation of time on Bill 117. All those in favour of the motion will please rise one at a time and be recognized by the clerk. Mr. Walker, Ms. Smith-Mayek-Winty, Ms. Thompson, Mr. Bethan-Foller, Mr. Fidelli, Mr. Ford, Ms. Elliott, Mr. Europe, Ms. McLeod, Mr. Clark, Mr. Yakibusky, Mr. Hardim, Mr. Tbolo, Mr. Barrett, Mr. Pettipi, Mr. Pettipi, Mr. Marto, Mr. Mictanel, Mr. Baley, Mr. Baley, Mr. McNott, Mr. McDonnell, Ms. Fullerton, Ms. Scott, Ms. Scott, Ms. Jones, Ms. Jones, Mr. Joe Scarborough-North, Mr. Joe Scarborough-North, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Phillips, Mr. Miller-Perry-Salesmococo, Mr. Letcher, Mr. Letcher, Mr. Coe, Mr. Coe, Mr. Downey, Mr. Downey, Mr. Gill, Mr. Gill, Mr. Coe, Mr. Kohland, Mr. Klan, Mr. Pars, Ms. Skelly, Ms. Skelly, Ms. Martin, Ms. Trienthe-Falo께, Mr. Sarkaria, Mr. Ostra, Ms. Mitius, This part this part this McKenna this McKenna mr. Nickler mr. Nickler this kusendova this kusendova Mr.. Romano mr.. Romano mr. Harry mr.. Harry this gamari this gamari this hogar this hogar this is Kara Holly this Kara Holly this is fee this is fee mr.. Joe will it oh Joe will it I just crop mr.. Crawford this can just can juice to Pachini mr.. Pachini mr.. Cran Mr.. Cran this is why this is why this is tangy this tangy mr.. Not mr.. Anon mr.. Shee mr.. Shee the sandu mr.. Sandu mr.. Smith Peterborough course Mr.. Smith Peterborough course mr.. Ballard mr.. Ballard mr.. Kuzetto mr.. Kuzetto mr.. Dunlop mr.. Canapati mr.. Canapati mr.. Mabiki mr.. Badiki mr.. Babur mr.. Babur mr.. Pay mr.. Pay mr.. Robert mr.. Robert mr.. Sabao mr.. Sabao Mr.. Phraser mr.. Phraser this wins win mr.. Koto down the line miss hunter Please rise Madame Jellin Missing brenton senator mr.. Vanta mr.. Vanta mr.. Orvath mr.. Natascha mr.. Natascha mr.. Fight mr.. Fight mr.. Saddle mr.. Shaw mr.. Mamata mr.. Mama mr.. Yard mr.. Yard mr.. Carpocher mr.. Carpocher mr.. Linda mr.. Linda mr.. Armstrong mr.. Stiles mr.. Kernan mr.. Wester West mr.. West mr.. Steven mr.. Steven mr.. Gates mr.. Gates mr.. Gretzky mr.. Gretzky mr.. French mr.. Miller-Hamilton east Tony Stony Creek mr.. Singh grantin east sing grantin east miss Andrew mr.. Happy mr.. Hatfield miss Taylor Taylor mr.. Arthur mr.. Arthur mr.. Bourguin mr.. Bourguin mr.. Bell mr.. Bell mr.. Glover mr.. Glover mr.. Morrison mr.. Morrison mr.. Rikosa mr.. Rikosa mr.. Montee's feral montee's feral mr.. Assan mr.. Assan mr.. Shreiner mr.. Shreiner mr.. Hillier mr.. Hillier The eyes are 72 the nays are 37 the eyes being 72 and the nays being 37 I declare the motion carry We have a deferred vote on government notice of motion. Oh, sorry We've a deferred vote on third reading of bill 107 an Act to amend the highway traffic act and various other statutes in respect of transportation related matters Call in the members. This is another five minute on May 29th 2019 Mr.. Yurt move third reading of bill 107 an act to amend the highway traffic act and various other statutes in respective transportation related matters all those in favor of the motion will please rise one at a time and be recognized Mr.. Mcdonald mr.. Mcdonald mr.. Fuller to the sky the sky this Jones Jones Jones Jones carver north chose carver north mr.. Phillips mr.. Philip mr..  Co down to down to gill to gill to co Mr.. Co, Mr.. Klan, Mr.. Klan, Mr.. Parsons to parse this Kelly this is martin Mr.. Martha philopolis chanthophilopolis, Mr.. Sarkari, sir, kari, sir, Ostra, mr.. Ostra miss minus miss mighty miss part this part this mechanic Mr.. Knickles mr.. Knickles miss kuzendova kuzendova mr.. Romano mr.. Romano mr.. Harder mr.. Harris mr.. Harris Miss g'Mari miss g'Mari miss hogar miss hogar miss is car hallio car hallio miss is feet miss is feet mr.. Cho will it is Cho will it is croft croft miss candy miss candy Pachina mr.. Pachina mr.. Cramp mr.. Cramp. This is why this is why this is dangling stangling mr.. Non Mr.. Non mr.. Rishi mr.. Rishi sandu sandu mr.. Smith Peter Brooke, Ortho Smith Peter Brooke, Ortho mr.. Bower mr.. Bower mr.. Kuzeno kuzeno mr.. Dunlap mr.. Dunlap mr.. Can mr.. Canapati canapati mr.. Mabikin badikin mr.. Babur mr.. Babur mr.. Pay mr.. Pay mr.. Robert mr.. Robert mr.. Sabao mr.. Sabao All those opposed emotional please rise one at a time and be recognized by the question miss bell miss bell My name is yellow man. I'm jealous mr.. Tabas your tabas this sing Branson center sing Branson center mr.. Vanta mr..  Natasha miss fight fight miss sat miss shop mr.. Begum mr.. Mama, mr.. Mama, mr.. Yard mr.. Yard mr.. Carpoche carpoche miss lindo miss lindo miss arms Are you sure miss arms strong miss style style mr.. Kernahan mr.. Kernahan mr.. West Mr.. West mr.. Steven mr.. Steven mr.. Gates mr.. Gates mr.. Gretzky mr.. Gretzky mr.. French mr.. Miller Hamilton east ony creek mr.. Miller Hamilton east ony creek mr.. Singh Brampton east sing Brampton east mr.. Andrew mr.. Happy to have you this tail tail mr.. Arthur mr.. Arthur mr.. Bargway mr.. Bargway mr.. Glover mr.. Glover mr.. Morrison mr.. Morrison mr.. Rikosa mr.. Rikosa mr.. Montee's fellow Mr.. Assange mr.. Assange mr.. Fraser mr.. Fraser mr.. Whittler mr.. Quoteau mr.. Quoteau but I'm the long man I'm alone mr.. Shriner mr.. Shriner mr.. Hillier mr.. Hillier The eyes are 68 the nays are 41 the eyes being 68 and the nays being 41 I declare the motion carry This house stands in recess until 3 p.m