All right, Baptiste, let's get this meeting started. And yes, please share your screen. Yes, so hello, everyone. So this is the weekly meeting for Jenkins Essentials Open Planning. So we're going to discuss the status of the project. So who is present? So Jenkins, Tyler, Jesse, Oleg. I'm not sure who is going to join. So let's just head over the statuses. So Tyler, maybe you want to get started? Yeah, so I made a significant amount of progress last week on the delivery of updates using a stubbed-out update manifest. As Baptiste and I were discussing a little bit in chat, I've been having some difficulty with the integration tests. But as it stands right now, the two things that are outstanding for that pull request, that is pull request 70, the integration tests I have to have to work, obviously, before we merge anything. And then I have one more, let's say, test case to add. And that is, right now, the update level is not being stored for anything. And so if you turn the Evergreen client off and bring it back on, it will just redownload everything. So the client side isn't doing the update level check just yet. That's fairly straightforward, but I can't really, I can't do that successfully until I get the integration tests, actually, to cooperate. But it's looking promising. Yes. I guess the next thing for the week would be to get some stuff deployed. Yeah. Sorry to go ahead, Baptiste. No, no, no, I was just agreeing and saying, yeah, from what I could tell in your PR, indeed, there's probably only left something like, because you've already written the war and plugins download, so now we need to say, OK, please, SupervisorD, restart Jenkins so it should work. And so, yeah, it's looking very promising. Yeah. Unfortunately, I'm at Microsoft Build most of the week. So I'm going to try to hammer in some changes in between talking to people about Azure and Jenkins and things like that. But what I'm hoping we can start this week is some of the infrastructure planning. And I haven't had a chance to look through your meeting notes on discussing some of the logs with Olivier, which I'm assuming has happened already. Yeah. It was my good morning. Getting to a place to where we can actually provision evergreen.jenkins.io or start to this week is something really interesting. Yeah, indeed. So go ahead. No, no, do you want to discuss other things in flight or are you just thinking is your status done? I don't hear anything if you're talking. For people listening, Tyler was saying that he would be on a not very good connection. So maybe I don't know if it's me or. I can't hear you. You can hear me. So I guess it's Tyler. So he did send the warning that it would be not a great connection. So yeah, let's just switch to you, Raoul, since you joined. So let's just give your status with regard to essentials. Add networks. Go ahead. Yeah. So not a lot of work for essentials. This week I've been firefighting on other sites. Regarding the kit plug in the ATH and PCT, which is already running on peer-required basis, it's working, but now we have detected some instability on the plug-in runs. So Mark is going to do some changes regarding the parent pump versions and things like that. And after that, he has requested me to help in case there are some problems with PCT or ATH, which is something that I'm going to do. I'm very used to peer with ATH or PCT. So that is what I'm going to do, probably. This is regarding those two issues. And after that, I'm going to start with all the great work on the custom work package and improve the flow on the plug-in. The ticket is not yet there, but it's created and it's on. By the way, I've got approvals to publish my pipeline library sources for my custom work package. So hopefully it will be something like online integration for you. Yeah, I know that will be great. If I'm lucky, it will be published today. Yeah, great. Cool. Anything else? By the way, the thing about the custom work package is not here. So is this unproposed? Or not my stone one maybe? It's not there because it wasn't intended for my stone one, but I'm going to add that here. Great. Anything else? Not sorry for being on so many fronts. Sorry for that. Thank you. I think I'm going to ask, even if there's no really something here, but I guess Oleg, you can go on if you have something to say about that. Well, I do not have specific updates for essentials, but I have updates for related things like a bill of materials. So one of good news is that we have reference documentation for bill of materials and custom work packages, which supports both inputs and outputs. I have integrated this poll request today, and I will be setting up pipeline tools so that we can relate it in our flows for testing purposes. I've placed it down into the chat. Okay. So it relates to the PR from Carlos in flight right now. Great. Okay, great. By the way, Taylor, I was going to say, Jesse, do you have any feedback from Carlos? Is he going to finish this PR? I guess I haven't. He's been traveling, so I haven't heard much from him recently. I hope they'll have time to work on that this week. Main status for me is I have a tool in progress, which looks for the most recent applicable incremental or other version of a given artifact. And initially I have it set up as a Maven plugin to do a palm update similar to the versions to various mojo's in the versions Maven plugin. And it turns like we now have a concrete YAML format from Custom War Packager that I could use to prototype a similar change in that format as well. Do you need this model to be decoupled to a separate library or you are fine with the current state format? That's fine. I mean, it's just all I would be doing is changing the version attribute, I suppose. I just need a working concrete example of a file to patch. And I think since last week for people possibly watching now or later, Jesse, you're kind of talking about what you did like Friday or something, but you did a lot since last Monday I think, whether you're doing incremental and checking and so now it's kind of working and merging the core and so on. Yes, it is in core. So any core pull request you file, it should be deployed automatically if all goes well. The way the new fall broke at the repository after the weekly on Sunday. Yeah, I already filed a fix for that already. So that's great because for outsiders, I would say, you would see that indeed now even the core is deployed automatically for each PR that gets merged. So that's great. And that just works for everything, not only the Jenkins war. It works now already for some plugins, the ones who have been configured to check those things. So that's great. Yeah, once Jesse finishes his tool, I will be setting up a prototype for Jenkins Docker image, which will be picking the last version of Jenkins core and maybe some components like remote. So that we will have a boilerplate Docker image. Yeah. Yeah. It would be useful at some point to set up incremental builds for remote angles. I haven't tried it yet. I have created a task for remote in constepler. So for remote in itself, it's going to be a problem now because pull request builder is broken so that you can't really rely on correct publishing. And for stepler, I think we can do that. But yeah, I haven't got to it yet. I mean, we have the main issue of stapler is we need to copy and paste a bunch of stuff because it's not using a Jenkins poem. Well, let's make it using Jenkins poem. Yeah, put it. Actually, I thought that I've modified stuff to use Jenkins poem. About that. Maybe it's slightly off getting off the topic for today but didn't we have some tasks somewhere about at some point moving stapler and dirty Jenkins here or is this not even a subject? Yeah. There is a task to do that somewhere. Make this kind of thing a little bit easier. Okay. I guess anyway we are going slightly off track. So let's get try to, or if you think something is really, really essential, you can obviously talk about this, but I think we just affect the ease of doing things like pushing small changes from remoting or stapler into evergreen production without having to do a full release and so on. I guess it makes more sense, by the way, for remoting than for stapler or maybe not because well, yeah, no, because I mean it's included anyway in the core so it needs a PR in the core to be picked, right? Not exactly. If you use customer or whatever. But for deployment evergreen, yes, there would be a matching core PR to pick up that version. But the point is that if we used incremental versions for remoting and stapler repositories then we had them being built properly then it would be easy to do that and get that going live in a matter of hours without having that happen. Instead of waiting to wait for someone to release a version of stapler. Right. Actually, we can do it even without incremental releases if you are fine with the fact that it goes from master branch. Okay. Or if I have a demo which does that, but yeah, it's kind of risky. My point is that, well, it makes a lot of sense, but I'm not absolutely sure this is the most urgent thing to do. But at the same time, it kind of tests the incremental story as a whole. But yeah, I think it could be postponed to my soul, two or three, because anyway, we would need to find something like a PR in the core and that part we would really deploy. So yeah, anyway. Thanks everyone. Let's... Yeah. Quick comment now you talk about incremental. Just would like to ask what do you think about using the ATH itself and the incrementals? I mean, at this moment, we are using a concrete commit on the metadata files to run in ATH and that commit has to be updated regularly. So I think it makes sense to use the incremental system to... I'm not sure because right now do we really run a given version of... It's not like we're using a release of ATH. We use the master branch, isn't it? Yeah, it's true. We use... So it's not really... It's not a Maven artifact. Yeah, so does it really... Do we really need that, Raoul? Because by that I mean, we already run the latest tip of ATH, don't we? We have the possibility to run master of ATH, yeah. But that is something that we have probably discussed. It's not ideal because you are not having a deterministic commit and that kind of thing. So... Yes. But I mean, you would point to some SHA, right? Anyway, if we use incrementals, you would have to use PR to update the SHA to some other value. So I'm not absolutely sure in that very case, incrementals offers a big difference for ATH by itself. No, we can't use it for ATH because again, we don't pick up a Maven artifact for ATH. What maybe you would like to do, Raoul, for ATH is automatically maybe file a PR on the core or something like this to test when there is a new commit, when we detect that the SHA being pointed to for the version of ATH on the core, there's some new version of, you know, some new SHA for the latest tip of ATH, then file automatically PR to test if ATH is as stable as before and then, you know, bump that version so that everything uses the latest of ATH. Yeah, that makes sense. So you want campaigners to be able to follow it? Sorry? So you want continuous delivery for tooling? Yeah, I guess you would like to make use of the latest as recent as possible version of ATH constantly, I guess. Yeah. Yeah, in practice, acceptance tests pretty frequently break for kind of silly reasons. Like somebody, you know, somebody makes this slight change to the format of a config Dutch Elliott and some plugin and then the selector doesn't match anymore. And so if you look through ATH history, we have a lot of places where it's doing like this long, if then switch where it's trying to deal with two or three different versions of the same config file, which are the same config screen, which is hard to maintain. So it would be nice to just be able to say, you know, this is the version of the test that I'm using. This is the version of the plugin that I'm testing. If you change the plugin format, well, okay, you can make a change to the test too and you can pick those both up in one commit. So you don't have to try to, you don't have to have these, you know, untested combinations of new ATH with old plugin or vice versa like we have today. Like we have, you know, for example, for testing LTS versions. My main concern here is that matching Git plugin making some changes on the user interface that is going to break the ATH for the rest of plugins. So typically in this flow, the maintainer of Git plugin is going to also commit the changes to the ATH to fix the test. And we need a way to make those fixes accessible for the rest of the people running the ATH. I see, I don't see a good solution. Can you, can you possibly, Raoul, Fai, Jira summarizing your rationale, your concerns and everything so that we can all understand it and dig into it possibly and maybe have a better understanding of and possibly the, I mean, the possible solutions you would have in mind and so on so that we can work on this and decide if it needs to be fixed like next week or next year. Yeah, yeah, makes sense. Right. So we have a bit less, a bit more than 10 minutes left. Don't think I gave my own status so I'm going to do that pretty quickly. So last week main thing was to basically work on the whole error telemetry story. So now the JetPop for the client side was merged a bit before. I've been writing some Node.js code and now we have the full story running, I would say, as a prototype. So we have Jenkins that is so writing logs in JSON format as per the JEP 304 I think on the disk and then the Evergreen client is reading those and pushing those into the backend of Evergreen so the backend that will in the future be deployed behind something like Evergreen.jenkins.io or something and now I'm writing the JEP for actually gathering feedback and so on because I've already a prototype for this but what will the API for pushing those logs look like for real? And I'm almost hopefully done. I was writing in that a bit earlier. So I hope to be able to submit that today later hopefully and I'm out tomorrow so I would like to try and submit that for feedback for today to save some latency. Is there any question about those things in general? Let me see. And also with regard to what Tyler was saying a bit earlier about the infrastructure, the Jenkins infrastructure and running thing, exactly. So Tyler is asking me for exactly the thing I was going to say so that's great. We are in sync. This morning I met Olivier Verlin, so one guy the guy that is working with Central Tyler on the Jenkins infrastructure and so we had a talk dedicated to how now there's services available and the setup available to handle the logging for services running in the Kubernetes cluster because for people not knowing about that so now the Jenkins infrastructure is I'm not sure how much but mostly running in a global Kubernetes cluster running in Azure so this is very, very likely that we will want to run the services for Evergreen, for Essentials in that cluster so that's why we were discussing how those things are set up right now so that we don't do things in a bad way. So for people interested as always as we are following the four opens, we have docs meetings and so I put a small summary here about what we discussed this morning and basically I think it's likely to be that the backend service that will receive the log and will push those in fluently that is already an existing component in the Kubernetes infrastructure for Jenkins and so then we will have those logs probably push in the Azure log let me see Azure Log Analytics probably at least in the short term but from an Essentials client I would say client initiative I guess it's not a big deal because the most urgent thing I would say is more to design how the endpoint will look like so that the instance around the world can push the logs and then if we change things behind then it shouldn't have an impact so that's why it's kind of more urgent so that we can actually have actual Essentials instances running and then possibly finish or adjust or change things in the back I hope it's slightly clear at least I guess we are mostly done everybody gave his status anything else for by everyone before we close Tyler I guess you're in crappy so I guess Tyler has nothing more to say Jesse, Oleg, Rao great so see you next week everyone bye bye


Hey guys, what is up? Welcome to my channel. For today's video, I am going to be ranking all of my affordable blushes from least to most favorite. If you aren't familiar, I do have a whole ranking series here on my channel where I will rank different brands, different types of products, all of that good stuff. Of course, this series was inspired by my friend, Kelsey Breonna J, here on YouTube. She's the first person that I personally ever saw do any sort rankings video, so I wanted to give her credit for that. Anyways, if you would like to see me or rank my blushes, then just keep watching. A couple of weeks ago on my channel, I posted a blush collection video where I showed you all of my blushes, and you guys seem to really enjoy when I actually ranked my bronzers. I am going to be ranking up my blushes, but I did break it up between affordable and high-end, just because for me, somebody who takes my rankings very seriously, I think that's the best way to do it. It's easier for me to actually get into detail about why I placed what where, whereas if I did my whole collection, there would be so many that would fall in the middle that I really wouldn't know which one is better or how I would rank them. So I feel like it's more accurate if I can break it up between affordable and high-end. That being said, though, affordable blushes are honestly amazing. A lot of these are definitely comparable, if not better, than some of my high-end blushes.  I feel like it's pretty tough to mess up a blush. Even looking at this entire drugstore collection that I have of blushes, all of them are really fantastic. I really like them. I also decided to organize them by formula. So obviously, if I have five of the same formula, I'm not going to rank all five of those colors. I gave each place based on formula. Since I had fewer affordable blushes, I also mixed in cream formulas as well as blush dedicated palettes. So if I had a drugstore or affordable palette that was completely all blushes, then I threw them in here as well. So I have 20 different options and rankings that I am going to be doing. Just a little warning. If you hear like some type of noise in the background, I accidentally put my mic too close to my lens so you can hear it auto focusing. Rookie mistake. It was kind of annoying for me editing and it'll probably be annoying for you watching, but like pretend it doesn't exist. Okay? So let's get started with number 20. And I would say of all of these, this is probably the only item that I can truly say I'm not really a fan of. And that is the CoverGirl Cream Blush in Flush. And it's not bad, but I found that this just completely disappeared on my cheek. I'm not sure if it's this color in particular, but I just did not have very good luck with it. I keep it in my collection because I do want to try a few more times before I give it up. Like I feel like this might be good with a tinted moisturizer kind of look, but for the most part, I haven't had luck with this. I wasn't too crazy about the way that it sat on my skin because it kind of made the foundation disappear. The color itself also disappeared. So I was not a fan of this. This is why this is number 20. Number 19. And I'm surprised this ranked so low, but I just feel like I have so many other formulas like this that I much prefer. And this is the ColourPop Blush Sticks. I don't think this is a bad stick at all. I have mine in the shade 258. It's just I have so much better, more emollients and blendable formulas that this is just not something that I see myself reaching for very often. That being said, this formula is way better than the highlighter stick formula version of this, if you ask me. However, I'm really just not too big a fan of this. I don't see myself using it too frequently and I'm not really tempted to go and buy more colors of this formula. So that's why this is ranking number 19. It gets the job done. It does work. I just much rather would prefer to buy like my milk makeup cream blushes. I really enjoy those. Number 18. This is definitely where I start saying the formulas of these are not bad at all. But I picked the Bourgeois blushes. I just don't find myself reaching for them very often. I did go through a phase where I really, really enjoyed these. But for me, I just don't find myself reaching for them quite as often anymore. I bought these when I went to Spain this summer. I believe these are a European brand. They don't sell them in the U.S. But you can get them on like Amazon. And this is a like a duo blush. This one I'm not too big of a fan of. It has like a sheen to it that I find a little bit unflattering on the face. So I really don't like that color. One that I do like a lot is Rose Blossom. This is a really pretty neutral color. The formula of this is not bad at all. And I really liked it over my powder foundation for everyday workdays. But for the most part, I just feel like I have formulas that I much prefer over this. And this does not last over time. I find that these blushes fade really quickly. Moving on to 17. This came in a boxy charm a couple of years ago. And I thought it was a really nice blush. I looked into purchasing a couple other colors, but ultimately it did not. I believe this ran around $10. This is from Note. And Note is actually a U.K. brand. It was available on Ulta for a short amount of time. And they did actually sell out, I remember, because this is a good formula. But right now it's no longer on the Ulta website. And this is in the shade Desert Rose. And this is a very nice formula. I find it to be a little bit too pigmented for my taste, which is why it's ranking where it's ranking. But blendability on it is really good. And the color of this is really good. Honestly, if you can easily get your hands on this for the more affordable price that it is, I would recommend it. I'm not really attracted to the packaging. I think it's a bit chunky, but it's not a bad formula at all. But if I have to go through the trouble of ordering it from a U.K. site, I'm just not going to do it.  Moving on to number 16. I really like these.  They just aren't the best formula, but they're very good for the price and what you're getting. And these are the Morphe A-Pan blush palettes. When I was looking online, I think they're getting rid of these. You can get these for like 50% off if they're still in stock at the point that I get this up. These are very attractive to me. I love a good blush palette. So this is the 8W Warm. And then I also have the 8C, which is the cool. And these are not a bad formula at all. I don't think they're the most blendable if I were to compare it to other blushes in my collection. But the amount of variety that you get as far as finishes, undertones, textures, all that good stuff, you have a lot here. And these certainly get the job done. They get that pink on your cheek. You look alive again. So they do what they're supposed to do. They're not bad at all. They're just not the best. But I highly recommend this for a blush lover. Whatever undertone you prefer, I'm not going to tell you not to get this. Because honestly, before I had all of the amazing blushes that I had, I definitely would have reached for this a lot more, because it has so many colors and it goes on the cheek perfectly. So I like those a lot. Number 15 is another cream blush product personally. I haven't found a blush liquid formula that's completely knocked my socks off. This is from Milani. And this is in the shade pink flirt. This is very, very sheer, but I do like the finish that it gives in my cheek. It instantly plumps my cheek. And I more so prefer this for that reason, as opposed to the color. I'm not sure if other colors are going to be more pigmented. But if you have anything deeper than a light skin tone, I don't see this specific color showing up on you. I do like the texture and consistency and I thought it lasted decent on my skin. And it's just an easy throw-on product for the summer. I like it. I don't love it. I don't see myself purchasing more colors of this. Honestly, 16 is kind of high. Now that I'm looking at this, I prefer some of the other blushes that I just talked about. Kind of more than this. So I would push this back, honestly, if everything wasn't set in stone. Moving on to number 14, I have the Kaleidos Lo-Fi Dual Blushers. These actually just released. I've had them for a couple of weeks now. Right now, I'm actually wearing the Lo-Fi Peach. So I have this all over my cheeks. And I like these a lot. I don't love them. I think that they are very light. So if you have, again, a deeper skin tone than myself, I just itch myself. Okay, anyways, if you have a deeper skin tone than myself, you probably aren't going to like this one. The Lo-Fi Rose especially is even a bit light for me. I don't find the shimmer formula to be that special.  But also, it's not that great of a highlighter. So I think the bottom powder product is a really nice formula, very pretty color. The top of the product is what kind of fails for me. And these aren't bad at all. And I love the packaging. I think they are beautiful. But the color range on this isn't very good. And I think they could work on that shimmery formula. Moving on to number 13, this is also a newer product in my collection. This is from BH Cosmetics. And this is the Malini blush palette. This is the first blush item that I have ever purchased from BH. And it is so cute, you guys. That is where BH always gets me. And I thought I was going to love this. I heard very good things about their blushes, especially for the price because they are so affordable. Honestly, I felt like every single color in here just about looked the same on my cheek with the exception of these two because this one is obviously exceptionally brighter than the rest. And this one is much more natural. And the formula was good. It was definitely an average formula. There was nothing special about it. But for the price and how pretty the presentation was, I definitely gave it some points up. But where I was not feeling was the fact that all of these are kind of the same color and they don't blend out the easiest.  So these aren't the greatest formula. I mean, if you're really into these colors, I'm not going to tell you not to buy it because it's good for the price, but it's just not the best. Moving on to number 12. I have the NYX Sweet Cheeks blush palette. I believe they're trying to phase this out. This was really popular at one point. And I really enjoy this blush palette. I bought this when I was first getting into blush and truly it's a very nice palette. The formula is decent. I don't think it's anything exceptional, but it does the job for sure. The colors aren't overly pigmented, which I really like because sometimes if you find a blush that's too pigmented, that's how you get that strong dot on your cheek and you can't really blend it out as well. I don't have this. So if you have a heavy hand, this is a good way to go about it. And also, there's a really nice range of colors in here. So I find the formula in here to do what it's supposed to do. I really enjoy the colors and finishes that this gives me. And so if you are starting off your blush collection, honestly, I think this is a great way to start. You have a lot of colors. The formula is good and you have a lot of options as far as texture goes as well. So I really do enjoy this one. I don't use it as much just because I have so many blushes, but I know back in the day if I had had this palette, this would have been used like crazy. Number 11 are these color icon blushes from Wet and Wild. For the longest time, I would swear by these blushes. As I was looking online, it seems that they have repackaged these into just circular hands, which I much prefer because this is the cheapest packaging ever. But I always thought that the quality of the blush did not match the quality of the packaging, which made it okay for me because the product is all that matters. My favorite shade is Mellow Wine. I just think this is a really great peachy formula. I also have Apricot in the middle, which has a bit of a sheen. I'm not too crazy about this shade. But for the most part, these are really great blushes. They were like $3 when I bought them. They have a really gorgeous range of colors. And as I've been saying, I certainly get the job done. They blend out very easily. They're not too pigmented. And these are a solid blush formula. And for the price, that makes it even better. If you're looking for a really great affordable blush option, I do recommend these. Number 10, this isn't a super new product to my collection. But as far as drugstore blushes go, this is still one that I'm trying to get to know. And this is the Primer Infused Blush from Elf. Honestly, I find the quality of this to be very high-end. I mean, the packaging's a little bit cheesy, but for what you pay, it's very, very nice. I have mine in the shade Always Rosy. And I think why I love this one so much is the shade itself is just so wearable and so versatile. And the product itself feels very, very creamy.  You could definitely put a high-end label on this, and I wouldn't suggest otherwise. So I really like this blush. I think it stays on a long time. It blends out beautifully. And there's not too many ways that I can use to describe blushes. This is a formula that I would enjoy getting more colors of, and they have a very good range of these as well. So again, a really great affordable blush to look into. Moving on to number nine, I have collected a few of these. And these are from Flower Beauty. I'm sad to see that they were taken away from Ultas in stores because I really like Flower Beauty. I think they come up with some really great and gorgeous products that feel and look high-end. And this is another one. So the reason why it's ranking at number nine though is because I don't love all the colors and all the textures in the line. For example, Warm Hibiscus has a bit of a gold sheen to it. I find that it almost looks a bit unflattering on the cheek. I don't like their sheen finish, but if we're talking their matte finish, I think they do a good job with the formula. I can feel that these are a more drugstore formula, but they do blend out beautifully. You can't tell that they're a drugstore if you blend them out and you work with them a little bit. I enjoy the color range that they have. They're very smooth, very creamy, and a nice blush formula to look into. They're really pretty, just the whole marketing and all of this. They did a very nice job with this. It's just I love some of the colors and not all of the colors. Number eight is a very similar looking blush to the ones that I just showed you, but these are a bit better. I think they're a bit more blendable. And this is the Mulani Flower Blush. They're called Powder Blushes. This is in the shade Romantic Rose, and I love this color also if you're looking for that great everyday blush. Romantic Rose from Mulani is beautiful. The only complaint I have about this is I wish it would last just a bit longer on the cheek, but if you have a good long lasting foundation, usually that will help this one hold up. I really like how creamy and blendable and lightweight this is. And it's just an overall really nice luxurious blush. I think Mulani does a great job as far as making an affordable product, feel like a little bit more of a luxury experience. Mulani is definitely the luxe of the drugstore, and they have killer blush formulas. And this one in their line is also very nice. Number seven is going back to Flower Beauty, and these are the Color Bomb blush products. So these I think of what I've tried are the best cream or liquid formula that you can get from the drugstore by far. As I stated earlier, I don't really care for the cream or liquid formulas that I find at the drugstore, but this one is actually decent. Certain occasions I have had this pull up my foundation a little bit, but for the most part, these are very, very good. I don't really struggle with that most of the time. I think they have a lot of great colors, and if you're looking into a good liquid blush for the summer that is affordable, I enjoy these. I really like the colors. You can build up the pigmentation on them. You can take them away. This is down pretty well also. So these are definitely a solid liquid formula that I enjoy. I much prefer cream blushes that are kind of in a pot that I can stick my beauty blender into. I feel like with that I could get a much more even application, which is why I don't love these, but they're so good. Number six is the Butter Blush formula from Physicians Formula. Now, my first kind of venture into this formula is with this Physicians Formula and Whaley palette, which by the way is an incredible palette. I highly recommend it. There are two of the Butter Blush formula in here. We have Apricot and then we have Wildflower. First of all, she chose very lovely colors to put in this palette. This is a really beautiful formula, you guys. So creamy, so buttery, not too pigmented, and they just add the most natural flush. That more so has to do with the colors that are in this palette. I really have been enjoying the formula of these blushes a lot. The experience of using them are great. They smell really nice and they just apply so nice and evenly to the skin. So I cannot complain about this formula at all. The next blush formula that I have to talk about are the Colourpop Press Powder blushes. Now, the ones that I have were all limited edition. I have a couple of pans back in my makeup collection. So I have two also from the Mulan collection and three from the Peaches collection. What I will say is though they've come out with so many different blushes that I've noticed there are some inconsistencies in the formula. They've just launched so many that not every single blush you're going to get is great, but the ones that I do have I really do enjoy. I love the ones from the Peach collection. I do find that within the Peach collection, some have more pigmentation than others. Some are a little bit more powdery and that's kind of that inconsistency that I'm talking about. But for the most part, they blend out very easily on the cheeks and their range in general just has so many different choices. You're not going to have any trouble finding a blush colour that you really like and I haven't had any complaints really about the quality also. So I think what is really pushing these to the top is that you're going to find a colour that you like. You're going to find a finish that you like within their range because they have so much and I haven't been disappointed with a blush from them yet. Number four is another Mulani formula and that is the Baked Blush formula. Now something that really kicked Mulani into the game was the Luminoso blush and for good reason this is a stunning blush you guys. Luminoso is a great way to start in their line. We also have Berry Amour. I really like this one for more neutral kind of everyday cheeks. Not every colour is a hit again. I have this one called Bello Bellini. This one I don't really care too much for the shimmer in it. I find it to be a bit too shimmery but if you find that happy medium formula these are going to bring so much life to your cheek because they do have a bit of a sheen and a glow to them that mixes flawlessly into your highlighter and these are a very popular blush formula for a reason. If you're into drugstore makeup everybody's really tried these Baked Blushes from Mulani and again a little bit more of a luxurious experience with their products so I really enjoy their Baked Blushes because I do enjoy a shimmery blush on my cheek and I feel like these do a good job of subtly giving you some glow without going too overboard if you get the right colours. Number three this is unbelievable that this is ranking so high because it is so affordable and these are the Essence Satin Touch blushes and they only have two shades so the range is limited but these are only $2.99 each. They're a very pretty and simple blush formula. The colours aren't too crazy so that you don't have a lot of options. Both of the colours that they have satin love and satin coral they are just both really neutral everyday blushes which I think makes them so approachable for me. I find these very easy to reach for because I know that the formula is going to be something that I like. I know that the colour is going to be something that I like.  You're going to see a little bit of life given to your cheek but not overly so. They're less shiny than the Mulani blushes that I just showed you but they're not a complete matte which I think makes them look very healthy on the cheek and I just love how natural the colours are and for $2.99 you can't beat it. Moving on to number two I have pulled out these Burt's Bees blushes. I just love the texture and consistency of these blushes. They are a completely matte formula. They are so stunning. They blend so seamlessly onto the cheeks. I have four shades but my favourite two are Shy Pink because I'm like a nice wearable everyday bright pink cheek and then we also have Bare Peach so if I'm going a little bit more warm or a little bit more peachy I love this one equally as much. The one that was kind of made popular from Kathleen Lights was Toasted Cinnamon. A lot of you guys really seem to enjoy this one. This was a bit too warm and brown on me for my undertone. I thought it looked a bit odd on me but if you really like those warm toasty cinnamon-y kind of colours you will really like this. There also is a colour for deeper skin tones now called Velvet Wine. I obviously haven't really dug into this because it's not going to be as flattering for my skin tone but the formula on these are really good, very blendable. I really like the natural colours that they have and I just find myself reaching for these a lot which is why I'm ranking them at number two because I just know I have a pink option and a peach option and that's all I need and I always like the way that they apply and look on the cheek. Finally moving on to number one when I was ranking these I was so surprised this came in at number one but again I wasn't because these are so bomb and I need to get more colours because I only have one but this is the best blush formula I have ever tried at the drugstore and this is the Almay Healthy Hue blush. I love this because I haven't found a drugstore formula quite like this. Now the packaging she a little cheap but the quality of this blush is beautiful and if you don't like a blush with a sheen you're not going to like this blush but this really gives you a healthy finish on the cheek. It gives a natural sheen that's not going to be unflattering on St. Matour's skin tones but it just gives you enough to really kind of hit the light and just make your skin look younger and plumper and alive and I have the shade Nearly Nude. I absolutely love this. You can kind of see that sheen in the pan here but not only is this such a beautiful and approachable colour it also gives you a nice sheen. It blends effortlessly onto the cheek. I'll show you even though I'm already wearing another blush. I just I love this one so much you guys. It's so pretty. I don't have a mirror so I'm just blindly putting this on but oh my gosh this is one of my favourite blushes and I purchased this not thinking anything of it. I was like huh never seen that before. I don't really use Almay but this really did knock my socks on. Alright you guys that is all I have to rank as far as my affordable blushes go. Don't worry I will be doing my high end.  I already know how I'm ranking them so I will get that video up for you if not this week next week. So it is coming also so thank you guys so much for watching this video. If you have any favourite affordable blushes don't be afraid to comment them down below. We can help each other. You can help me. If you aren't subscribed to my channel already I would love it if you would take the time to do so. That would be much appreciated and I hope you guys are doing well. I hope you're staying safe and I will see you guys in the next one. Bye guys have a good one.


Ladies and gentlemen, welcome back to full metal alchemist brotherhood. My name is Jack the bus you can call me I should know be today. We are starting part four on Netflix again I know you guys said the parts don't really matter But it's it's kind of like a turning point because it's like kind of like the chapters for me at least the dwarf in the Flash so last episode we we ended with all of them being kind of snowed in and them finding out that the four up north is Not safe anymore general Armstrong is gone. She's been relocated Unfortunately, basically my hero of the show might one of my favorite characters very quickly has been kind of torn out from her position I even sure what's happening with her right now because we haven't gotten an update since she was removed They basically sent out alters to kind of warn everybody in the northern that we're going to the northern fortress that it's not Saved there anymore basically like the government like central has made their reach all the way that far now I don't even know if there's anywhere safe So we're gonna hop right into it the only thing we have to worry about is holding down this fort as for the general Well, I'm sure the tigers in central will make sure she's taken care of Nice to see they posted you in central Mustang. No, it's solely based on merit That's rich coming from you. You know how she loves what? Mustang general. I think she'll gain a lot of respect for no one would he's had to put up with for an extended stay I imagine well sometime we should grab some dinner Your treat. I hope you know I could eat you into bankruptcy He's like you're short on both money and nerve, huh? Maybe I could offer some flowers instead only she saw how what he had to put up with their many fine Fluffs here in central may enter. She's such a straightforward person. I love her better not hurt her now then general arm strong We need to talk about general Raven's recent disappearance. Just what have you done? I won't be able to hide Pardon me your Excellency, but I simply don't understand how you can employ someone as careless and incompetent as general Raven Is that the reason you saw fit to dispose of him? Surely you don't need him. It can't be good to have someone so talkative on your senior staff You have me intrigued general. What did Raven say? Immortality your Excellency's identity She's playing into it pretty hard things without any prompting. I mean kind of true actually Yeah, and after learning all of this you still responded to my summons.  Let's go, baby. Play into him She kind of has to interesting. I like the way you play very well the eye You have general Raven's seat, but as I expect you'll understand my men will take over Fort Briggs agreed Of course as you wish she had to my soldiers are extremely strong and well trained sir I guarantee they will serve you well your Excellency. I'm sure they will I appreciate the sacrifice They're literally a sacrifice. He will literally murder them all it's necessary But what was it a land of blood that he needs you have to enter her den It seems like the generals landed herself right in the middle of it. Yeah, and now this place is theirs, too Although our leader might be gone. We still stand as well. It's not like they're empty without her with one will. Yeah, they're a very tight-knit group Let's go, baby a monkey list the dwarf in the flask the dwarf in the spot taken no I'm just kind of yummy. I'm gonna be honest See for yourself. I have to work through every meal or I can't keep up sounds like this is gonna be a dull conversation The shadows dude, I hate it Scars up in the north they have to communicate somehow others are up there as well I see just wait a fine line here. Oh my former classmates Lucy and Ian are stationed up there They like to keep me informed aren't the north and east conducting joint exercises this spring. Yes I think you're right happening. I hope major miles and buccaneer. Don't show us up like they have in the past miles Buccaneer, okay. It's a secret code. Ida and sugar. I'll spoke to her to have it Oscar a monculous You mean you need Lucy again. You need once more just telling him who's it's who the first the monculous is. Yeah Suddenly Bradley is a monculous Let's go Hawkeye at a girl Nope not in the central The more and more they do these really wide shots of central it just I feel like it's like supposed to be a reminding factor of what It's made for what it's used for It's all right look over here the father's back story.  Is this the door from the class? I'm number 23 Not your number number to tell me your real name like the slave I don't have one you mean a person without any rights or freedoms someone trafficked and deeded as a possession Deed it. What's that?   Who are you? You'll want a noble sounding one right deal. The of rastus bombastus. That's too long best Oh, yeah, you're not that smart. Hey, you are plenty smart. Well, how about fun? Ho and I how does that sound so von ho and I'm huh? So that's not the father. I don't need to read and write to do my work your slave work So ho and I was asleep. Don't you even want freedom?  You're no different from me trapped inside this stuffy flat. Let me teach you What do I call you? And why is the father thinking of that like he's he said it showed him sitting there in a cut to this All things are made from one and in the end all things returned to one one is all indeed and all is one as well All is ultimately of the one so if all is not included in the one then all is nothing you have passed You are now an alchemist. Oh, and I'm why does his voice sound familiar? I'm still only fit to be an assistant. My skill is nothing near your master That's definitely Salim I live as well as I do now because of the knowledge you gave me and I've also earned the master's respect I'll even be able to get married and have a family a family Huh? How inconvenient for you humans unless you form communities and breed Don't call it breeding how pathetic they're not it's a concept that you're able to understand That's where humans find happiness We live for the bonds that we form with friends and family members. That's who we humans are whatever you say, okay Then what is it that makes you happy? I'd hate to be guilty of asking too much But I think I'd be happy if I could just leave this place He's gonna set it free or why would someone who already has so much power and prosperity need such a thing? What's your tongue door in the royal presence if you continue with this insolence?  That's enough chatter immortality Tell me is it possible or is it growing impatient in your old age? lamentable Okay, I'll tell you how you can achieve a Dude, I'm trying to connect the lines with Xerces, but it's hard irrigation canals the kings ordered them to be dug all throughout The country that's the king for you. He even cares about the well-being of us commoners. Yes. He does So he told me he told the king how they needed to basically like make the land a blood again Like where they murder everyone and so that's why Gave him the secret The irrigation canal Was for this was for the Okay, so once one is done it's lit Okay, especially from the information we've learned from the tunnels being dug and where the cities are being massacred Ho and I was a part of that so that's why he knows what's gonna happen Does he take it he doesn't need it he's a Homunculus right or does hoenheim take it because hoenheim can't die Indeed or hoenheim said he's not doesn't have a human's body Yeah, so Salim does basically swoop in and take it. This is the human sacrifices and he's being used as one They tricked the king So that So he told him the wrong place and used them so that's why hoenheim is immortal he's Used a transmutation circle the original transmutation circle from Xerxes Wow She That's his original body being taken away But now I just don't understand why the father looks so much like him Maybe he was split into two parts like one good one bad and that's the future That's what would happen to central but how do multiple people achieve immortality like how Bradley has the table and you get a chair I guess if you're at the center of everything And that I guess said that this is why hoenheim knows exactly what's going to happen or what's happening as they speak It's just a repeat of Xerxes Tony mayonnaise Everyone's dead sub for him literally everyone It's no use all of their souls have been taken from them. Oh, they're master majesty. Oh, are you all right? Tell me wait your body How is it feeling? Oh? Using your blood I created a receptacle for myself. I can walk on my own Oh What's going on here? What's the difference between him and saline? Thank you for your blood and I've given you knowledge And now I've given you a body that will live forever Focus your attention within yourself. He didn't even want immortality You hear them. Don't you the voices of all the people in this country who were offered in exchange for your immortality Well half of their lives were for me actually I appreciate your cooperation It all makes so much sense now She's one that the father once uses a sacrifice to though and I finally get to meet the one who taught my son I'm sure they must have been a handful. Oh, no, they were fine boys Let me get your medicine May I have a look at her? I'm all right.  This is zoomie. You have seen the truth. Oh, he just wanted a minute with her sacrifice Please be honest with me my insights were taken. I was trying to bring my child back to life. I see I'm sorry No, he has to be helping her he has to be helping her He shoved his hand into you, but my breathing. It's he helped her. How can that be? There's no wound your organs were taken away as a testament to your sin They cannot be brought back that I did rearrange your entrails somewhere to improve the flow of blood. It's a zoomie Give in to your fate just yet.  I am a philosopher stone in the form of a man. That's what I am Yeah, I was like man that clears a lot up and then that happened and I'm just like how did he? Rearrange it and there's not even a wound so that clears up so much behind why we got the like why he's immortal I'm so tad confused on whenever it showed how he like had blood come out of his chest and fall onto the ground Unless those were like just the child's sacrifice or those were like just the sacrifices in general from Xerxes I'm not white sure. Oh, there is a post credits Okay, so we'll wait on that like one of the comments that it's just to clear so many things up and it really did It makes a lot more sense now on why the father looks exactly like him It's literally like a part of him split off now My only question once again is the relationship between the father and Salim because isn't the first time I thought the first homunculus was Salim unless he's like two parts like Salim is one part of it and the parts What off from hoenheim is the other part that's the only part that's a little confusing I'm not sure if that's even meant to be cleared up yet But either way I'm really glad we got that cleared up because it's building this world more and more on how we can Understand why everyone is the way they are and why the father looks like hoenheim And what happened at Xerxes and how hoenheim's immortal. It's very nice. So like I said, it's just nice having all of this kind of Celestial stone grand elixir the philosopher stone is known by many names. It's not necessarily a stone the one not necessarily a stone the one that Kimblee has is similar to a crystal you say it has incredible power I would have expected it to be a little bigger than that. I've never seen one That's much bigger than a small pebble Cut to his father The more people involved in the sacrifice of one the larger the stone physically I mean that makes sense because they literally massacred that many people it was split into two two separate people That's how many were involved in the massacre that must be why the transmutation circle is the entire country Because they have so many people that they need to make into basically a living walking philosopher stone That's so interesting man. Just like I said the world building is incredible And with that being said, hope you guys have a wonderful rest of your day. I'll catch you in the next one. Peace!


We aren't helping users understand that, you don't think Amazon's got it quite right? Well, I think, I'm going to go back to that one second, one second. What I think, you know, this being Berkman and Berkman being the incredible leader in thinking about the internet in this country, and now with this wonderful tied architecture in both senses of the word, I would love to see some senses of the principles that come out of this discussion today, right? What are the emerging principles that we're trying to talk about here? And I hear context, though as I say context is I think it's very difficult to deal with. It's a very complex, I hear usage from Dana, I hear control, though that's difficult too. I hear transparency in our discussion before that you mentioned as a context. So, you know, what are the appropriate behaviors that enable a public and public discussion to be created at the same time preserve the rights and privacies that we have and where that goes? So, what does Amazon do wrong or what could they do better? What's the lesson? Well, I mean, that particular question is less interesting to me than transparency and usage. I don't want to hear what Amazon has wrong, just for a quick second. Harry Potter issue, right? The massively popular things badly skew their recommendation algorithm. So, you know, I'll get continually, I can't stand fantasy. So, it's not a matter of principles, it's a matter of execution. Yeah, well, it's a little bit of both. Okay, all right, keep going then. Yeah, I mean, to me, you know, one of the things that I tried to inscribe in my distinction between the things which were, like, less problematic and less threatening and more problematic and more injurious was the local use of locally gathered information. And to my mind, if you're just acting on something in its immediate physical ambit, that is, and you know, space and time, that is ultimately going to be less of an issue for me personally than something. I mean, I just don't believe in anonymous data anymore. I don't think that we can speak of anonymous data unless something is in perfect and serene isolation. You don't think we can create policies to maintain the anonymity?  Yeah. But couldn't we create an accountability framework in which that data was walled off effectively for use? In law, but not necessarily in practice. But isn't there, but it's worth trying, you know, because one of Google's founders had said that if we use the flu trends to predict the next pandemic we could save in his perhaps overblown calculation a third of the population of Earth. So there's some context in which predictive analytics of that form don't really bother me at all. But there are other contexts in which predictive analytics so clearly cut against our social contract. I mean, think about, you know, the police would love to be able to use predictive analytics to cite resources and to say, well, we know where the last 15 murders in the city have occurred and, you know, we're going to like locate our resources in neighborhoods where we know the crime is about to happen, right? It stands to reason. And yet it cuts against our entire history of law and jurisprudence. And it's redlining, right? I mean, it's going to lead to that sort of thing, inevitably, and wherever enacted. And I think, you know, if we can see that, you don't think that's... No, I think it's blown too far. I think that's good budgeting. I know a lot of... If the argument is that police could prevent someone from being murdered, how is it a bad thing to have them try to do that in that context? If it leads to kinds of profiling that are injurious to people's lives... That's a different question. That's a different question. I don't think it is. I think the two things have become very... That's where you go back to this idea, Shiv. You're not allowed to know that. You're not allowed to act on that. So if you say we have to have, by a matter of principle, the same number of police per square mile throughout the whole place... No, that would be an absurdity. Okay, that's where you're headed. Not necessary. I don't know. I mean, I think this could require an afternoon. All right, fine. We'll take it off. Jeff, you displayed that magnificent image of someone's data shadow as you put it being displayed, which I kind of love as long as everybody knows what's going on and you talk about controls over that. But back to creepiness. I hear people talk about using AR, the fact that we can use facial recognition, the fact that with AR we could have Google goggles tell us, I could scan the room and find out the Weinbergers are vegetarian and that Ethan does this and so on and so forth. That I hear often is described as creepy. So one of the principles... I think the value of what you propose is great. One of the principles that you would try to have to make it operate in such a way that people would welcome it rather than call you creepy. Well, I have a 16-year-old son who's currently doing his final exams in high school and it's in a city school in Switzerland, so there's even in Switzerland, there's a lot of cheating going on. And we've been talking a little bit earlier about how we could redesign the space to encourage probably better interaction and maybe even a fair way of acting. And I think that the anxiety of those kids are mainly that it's such a lack of tracking of what people are doing. Because the fair people who are not cheating are getting punished in a world where the information is incomplete. So there's a benefit to them... I think there's a benefit to have their identities tied to the information that is legitimate about them. Well, I think the whole thing about the hyper-public and this campus that we're creating is a bit based on the premise that if you are... essentially, if you are honest citizen, if you're a good person, you benefit from things being public. Yeah. I agree. When I drove into Amsterdam last hour, I was driven into Amsterdam at some point in the road. Everyone slowed down to the speed limit. Everyone. As an American, I was freaked. What's going on here? And the driver said, it's a sensor and we'll all get tickets. So on the one hand, logically, that makes perfect sense. To an American, it seems creepy. It seems like a bad local use of this data. Logically, it says we're going to reduce accidents and save lives and it's a good thing. But it's a case where our norms and our technology just don't match yet. Right? If you could all be in Google's auto-driven car, that would be wonderful, but we lose control and we don't like that. This is exactly what we're trying to negotiate now. Benefit. We're talking too much about fear, I think, and not enough about benefit. I think this is a slightly different issue. I think this ties into what Betsy was saying about shame and shamefulness. I think that... I think the more you are shameful about something, the more you fear this lack of privacy. Right? Yes, but that will strike some as puritanical. Not that you're from... not from the... the birthplace of that, yes. There's a little Calvinistic in... and I don't disagree with you, but I think that's the fear is that somehow it becomes kind of a judgment matter. That goes to Eric Schmidt's line that if you're... if you're going to be ashamed of people knowing they should do this, then you shouldn't perhaps be doing it. I think it makes perfect sense, but got as often Eric Schmidt lines are tweeted and misconstrued. Do you... What do you think of that? That construction right there? It has never historically sat well with me. I didn't figure it would. Let me come on out and get the discussion going. Anybody? It sounds like it's a question of abuse. The design would be very good, but then it looks like maybe we need to have systems and part of the design should be to prevent abuse. Because the one person's concern about abusing the system of say for example predictive analytics, essentially you're still guessing and you could get it wrong and humans tend to be lazy and we rely on it too much. And so maybe how do you prevent people from overly relying on something that's just a guesswork? I was talking earlier about the social network you're trying to create and that part of the issue that part of the issue here is the expectation of it that if Facebook were presented as a sharing service, the whole reason to be here is just to share, Twitter like, then the fears about privacy would be lessened. So the definition of abuse goes into the prediction what you think this thing does. Yeah, exactly. So that's where the Harry Potter thing comes to because the prediction algorithm is not doing its job right that's why you said it's about the execution. So maybe we are relying on it too much as opposed to being aware of it but maybe it should be part of the design itself to not rely on it so much. I should point out too that like Amazon I've bought one book a week from Amazon since 1997. Amazon has more information about me, my habits, my behaviors and predilections as expressed through the exchange of hard currency than any other organization on Earth including Google and they're still recommending Harry Potter to me. You can fix that but it provides the means you can say don't use this again. It gave you the power, are you trying to complain about it? I do use that, I check that box, it comes back up there's something in...  Well, this is what we're being told. I'm sympathetic to your prevail. That's not normative. Over here. Hi, I'm Jean Rosenberg from Baruch College in CUNY. I guess this week a couple of conversations came up around privacy. Yesterday at Birkman and before that at a corporate council conference that I attended and I'm interested in getting the panels read on it. When you think about privacy and what you've been discussing, you've been discussing the privacy interests of the individual and what's at risk when that individual loses some of his or her privacy but what about risks relating to third party abuse such as the example of insider trading if you've got a CEO of one company that's going to some small Midwestern city and so someone third party can kind of put together that maybe there's some deal that's in the works and then take advantage of that and basically take advantage of investors who don't have that information who haven't researched that or what about an example that some of the media team were talking about yesterday about knowing someone's location and then being able to break into that person's house? What about abuse of information in ways that aren't necessarily offensive to the person to the individual in terms of their privacy but that can cause risks to their safety or can cause some risk to their property? What about when they are offensive? We were told when the backscatter and millimeter wave machines were introduced at the airports that those scans would be locked up and never available to any third party and very early on it became obvious to everybody who had any knowledge of those machines whatsoever that these printouts were being passed around by the TSA people that they were escaping from the containment that was designed for them and that in principle there's no way to design these sort of perfect isolation bubbles in which these facts can reside. I tend to think the Canadian Office of the Privacy Commissioner has a little piece of dog roll that they use that it's a little cute but it makes a lot of sense to me, it says if you can't protect it, don't collect it and that has to be my bottom line on all of this stuff, even if there is value that might be mined from that information in the future. If you have no way of protecting that information then you have to assume that some harm can come to vest in the lives and the life choices of the people that that information has been gathered from and that's what doctors have been doing for millennia like first do no harm I'm just not convinced by the notion that there's all this amazing benefit out there to be derived from this that outweighs the potential damage particularly to vulnerable individuals. Go ahead. Well, first I'm all for protection of privacy, it's not that but in the two examples that have been talked about the Harry Potter example or the intruders who gets the information to get into a house into your house the problem there is really that the information is not complete, there's not enough information Amazon doesn't know enough about you otherwise it wouldn't if the system would know about the intruders that wouldn't happen either, right? So it's an uncanny valley problem we've got almost enough information but not quite a perfect amount Yeah, so you can either try to hold it back or push it further it's like a train that goes perhaps in the wrong direction but at least accelerate it so that it crashes but at this point you're just holding something back I want that to be the design principle that's built in everything you know, push it further so that at least it crashes I think that's beautiful There's another angle here that's worth mentioning which is you can maybe get both worlds so the location example of I don't know if it's Facebook or Foursquare where it was like the please rob me thing that's an individual with an identity posting their location The flip side of that is anonymous collection of location data like that that is done in the location services industry at large where it actually does provide tremendous value and you can capture that value while protecting the identified data set and I think that's the distinction that is most interesting to me is how do you get the latter bit of that while protecting the identities involved so that you can prevent that type of that type of breach This is turning into the classic discussion we have these days around fear and privacy if that notion of if you can't protect it don't collect it means that you'll never collect anything because you're always managing to the worst possible case the highest common denominator of fear and liability if something could go wrong with it then you shouldn't collect it I don't want to live in that world I really don't, by the way I'm a weird guy, I wanted to use a scan as my author photo I wanted to push back to the panelists who paint this picture of privacy is really if you have something to hide don't share, only the people who have something to hide are the ones who won't share it I'm reminded of many years ago one of my first tasks was for a cancer registry I mean a disease registry and they wanted to make sure the people who had HIV diagnosis were not released so it's a very simple thing, you have an HIV we're not supposed to release that information but now you have a list of all these patients and the only ones blotted out are the ones who have HIV so it became immediately clear to me that privacy can't be the issue of hiding only that which, from an individual perspective that in the case of that registry it had to be a kind of societal value and that I had to also suppress other people who didn't have HIV in order to protect the people who did have HIV and adhere to the societal regulation well, I'll come back to you first myself, right but then you affected those people whom you also blotted out I wrote about my prostate cancer I got incredible benefit by doing it under my name, it was my choice and it was easy for me to do it because I'm a white American male in the US and I'm public and obnoxious but I got incredible value back because my name was attached I got friends who brought me advice who brought me benefit that I could not have gotten otherwise right, so in the effort to come up with the safe rule for all you affect people in two ways actually that's not correct so remember I live in the world of parallel universes the universe that I talked about you can't find out about your prostate cancer you couldn't find out it from this source it didn't mean that there didn't exist another universe in which you could find out about it and an example you gave was one where you gave that information the point is a very profound one I wanted to go back to a point Betsy made a couple of times actually in what she was saying which had to do with maybe going back to a point again in Natania's slides this morning maybe this isn't actually a trade off at all maybe you can have both maybe you can have privacy protection and still have a flourishing advertising ecosystem and one observation I would make is that what makes us individuals are the differences between us even identical twins are different but what makes us economically valuable is our similarities do you think that that leads us to any kind of potential solution to some of the intractable problems we've been discussing I'm not sure I completely understood the question so let's see if my response makes any sense what you said resonates in the sense that the types of value that I think about from big data is I mean Jeff point taken that there's value in you sharing your individual life history but I'm actually more interested in the aggregate sort of analysis of social data where you do actually find similarities you're applying statistical machine learning to a big data set to learn something interesting about that big data set to learn something about the individual pieces of data in there even though as has been pointed out any one of those individual pieces of data is probably re-identifiable in some theoretical world and so I think you can put in systems to provide accountability and protection of that aggregate data set to protect against that risk spot on I think your response was gratifying I think it also goes beyond economic value if you're looking at an individual and those individual characteristics and they are unique from a medical point of view you're in the territory of Dr. House you know, Freakville medical detective work for most people it's the similarities that doctors diagnose the problems we have so I think what you say is potentially also applicable in medical record protection we have time for a few more I wanted to go back to some of the examples you gave Adam and you talked about how this morning there was a lot of talk about how informed consent might not be the paradigm in which we are moving towards it seems to me that there's a possibility that we're moving towards what might be called uninformed consent and I was wondering if that you find the case where we have the option to choose to engage with systems but are not really told the results of what that system is doing or collecting if you see that as a trend and if so whether it's problematic yeah so the construction I apply to these things is very much about another distinction which the morning also revealed to be increasingly problematic which is that between public and private space I mean if we're blurring the thresholds and boundaries between these conditions then some of the things that I'm talking about and asking for don't really hold up very well and we should be really clear about that the existence of a screen that's capable of capturing biometric identifying information about you doesn't bother me if it's in the product store it doesn't bother me if it's in Walmart it doesn't bother me if it's in McDonald's because in some senses you've consented to that by crossing the threshold and I think that there's probably that could be argued as well but as sort of a clear identifying marker for me where you know that's not my domain that's not what I'm designing for I'm designing for what we traditionally call public space and the condition of the street and in that context there's no way to inform you or achieve your consent your consent is implicit your consent is bound up in the action of passing in front of a screen like that and again you know I might not be the most active advocate for the things that I believe but that doesn't sit right with me just as somebody who walks through the streets of the city do I have anything that I necessarily need to feel guilty about I don't know I don't know that that's the question though are there policies and procedures which could be enacted on the basis of that information which would be detrimental to me or run strongly at variance with my desires absolutely and that has nothing to do with shame or guilt or any of those priorities so again there's this sort of user experience challenge I mean if you're going to design something that lives in public space and is going to be gathering that information and there is this burden upon you to inform people of that and to you know get some kind of acquiescence from them some kind of formal acquiescence from them before proceeding with that how do you design that into a situation where somebody is walking past that at normal speed and the engagement itself might last a third of a second if you can't respond to that in a meaningful way then I think you ought not to be deploying that technology there what I'm interested in doing right now personally as a designer is finding out a lot more about the future history of informed consent because frankly it's the model that I built a lot of my assumptions on and if that's kind of being subjected to evolutionary pressure at this moment in history oh boy I better need to find out about what comes next because it is implicit in what I designed that there is this model of agency and consent thanks Jenny to me how many of you guys have ever heard of the band or the individual musician Momus because he has a great song called the age of information which definitely runs into the sort of utopic language around this where basically the substance of the song is in the future everyone will know everything about you and they will decide whether they're your friend based on who you actually are which I think was really contemporaneous to what the 15 years ago when he wrote it it was a very utopic exciting idea of a song but I wanted to push back on two memes that I keep hearing in this space and that came out on this panel as well that I'm not sure if I believe and the first one Latanya addressed very clearly which is this idea that if you don't have anything to hide you're going to benefit and I really don't agree with that and I actually heard Evan Moglin on Science Friday a couple weeks ago just saying it very clearly that while it may be true that you're not doing anything that is wrong there have been things historically that are always private where your children are what medications you take what your symptoms are from your insurance companies at a certain moment there are real reasons for this level of privacy and I think to contest it is crazy the second thing I would just say though is this meme that's come out on this panel privacy is only about shame I think is a very narrow definition of the benefits and values of privacy and that I may look at my husband in a private way I may have shared stories with my best friends that are private that are nothing about shame at all but that are about a level of intimacy that I am granting to them and the idea that somehow all of this is fair game and the future seems crazy to me so positive idea behind it just for clarity do we think we anyway said that that the privacy is only a matter of shame I heard that a couple times I quoted John and Franzen but Franzen, yeah it was just an interesting quote just for clarity don't relax the meme is not taken off as badly as you think that's all I'm trying to suggest Hi Jackie Kerr I wanted to add to that actually shame I thought it was a great quote but I also thought of, I've studied Soviet history and I thought of Joseph Brodsky's essays about the need to hide in private kitchen settings to have real conversation during the late Soviet period and I think that privacy can be constructed as being only about shame in a perfectly democratic society perhaps not in any society in which the public norms are not viewed as legitimate by all in that society and in any non-democratic society you really run into those issues and I just thought that was a point worth throwing out there for the discussion thanks yeah I mean we know historically as a matter of mission creep if information can be collected and used against you then ultimately it will be used against you across the board and that's what, we live in a democratic society at the moment I'm grateful for that but I think to assume that the society will always be democratic and that information will always have the protections it has now is fatuous in my personal opinion so I completely agree with you dystopian or neotopia it's not a dystopia it's historical okay, wait I'm not going to speak myself up we have two weeks Hi, Shreya Murthy at Brickman Intern I'm actually writing a paper right now reviewing the work of Daniel Solov who if any of you guys are interested in sort of like the legal and philosophical basis of the way we think about privacy specifically in the courts it's an excellent readies got a paper called the taxonomy of privacy and one thing that I think is really relevant the idea of like shame as being you know the main justification for a right to privacy the courts have actually recognized that there is such a thing as dignitary harm which occurs when privacy is breached that there are, there's a certain sense of your person and your personal effects that is harmed when there is a breach of privacy and I just think that that's something that you know we should recognize this is an understood concept that there is something specifically wrong with putting a person in a position where they don't feel comfortable acting freely or thinking freely or doing anything that they in a society that recognizes free speech as such an important value should be able to do yeah that's right and it's not just about the transition to totalitarianism it's about the transition out of totalitarianism as well I mean one of the my favorite historical examples is all the information that was collected by the East German security state wound up in the Stasi archives when that regime fell that information became freely accessible all of a sudden and people's life chances were harmed by it and only in retrospect did you know people judge them on the basis of the actions that were taken 20 or 30 years ago without having any understanding about the things that stipulated your honor bad things can happen but if all I'm trying to say is if all we do is manage every choice we have and we don't join in with our fellow human beings enough because of these fears, fears, fears I think we're going to lose the benefit and the power of this tool of publicness that we now thank you internet folks have right I think the fear is really relevant I mean that you keep bringing this this concept I think is very important because it seems to me that we are still in the paradigm of the Benham paradigm we are being watched we don't know when by who who is collecting our data so we are all in prison in a way a society in this in this condition if we follow what Adam is saying for example right but there are other aspects of it I mean the are not of privacy keep changing so it's not are not of privacy it's not the same that it was in the Victorian age or that it was even before this morning somebody said that privacy basically started in the Victorian age you say something about what and someone about the same so you know define culturally Robin Evans wrote a very beautiful article called figures doors and passages where analyzing architectural space he talked about how in the space of the renaissance there are these palaces that lead from one room to another and people will be passing by and people will be making love or defecating or everything and everybody had a sense of privacy despite the fact that they are being exposed right so the introduction of the wall in architecture to separate what is private and public is historical to as it is the construction of that wall with the open plan so we are in a new pattern where definitions of what is private and public are changing and you know for example a couple of years ago there was a few years ago there was an article in the New York Times maybe it's now ten years ago the manufacturers of curtains and says we're all going out of business because people didn't think anymore that they have to have them right so in an age in which we are all so much more exposed to new media people didn't feel that the curtain in your wall was such a kind of a point thing to have right so we are more able and then what concerns with privacy have changed to as it has been repeatedly say it has more to do with our medical histories than with other aspects that may have preoccupied the Victorian age right so what is interesting and I think about this conversation is that it expresses the fears of us as a society in multiple ways and that's what we should be paying attention to what is our I think we will agree in the end of it is that one is making a bet on the future so when a gay or lesbian person comes out and uses the power of that publicness to fight down the bigots and gets married in public and is registered they're making a bet that they're not going to find a backlash and turn around that gays will again be shoved back into the closet whether it's totalitarian governments or anything and that's a bet that one chooses to make on optimism and that's the kind of negotiation we're going through right now I think we've run out of time entirely anybody want to respond to that or okay I want to thank the panel very much for a discussion that went in surprising ways thank you


Hello, welcome to Combined Wing Chun. I'm Sui Fu David. Welcome to Wing Chun Dummy Training Techniques, also called Mok Yan Zhong in Chinese. In this video series, you're going to see 116 Wing Chun Wind Dummy Training Techniques, 116 moves from Yip Man's Wind Dummy Form. I'm going to show you each move step by step with the action cam, so you have the best way to learn the Wing Chun Form at home. Make sure you subscribe and click the bell for notifications, so you don't miss a single lesson in this series. Here we go. Welcome to Wing Chun Wind Dummy Training Part 2. We're going to cover the Section 2 of the Wing Chun Dummy Form by Yip Man's 116 Move Wing Chun Dummy Form. So we've got up to move number 10, I think, on the first section, and now we're going to start to move the moves in the second section. So just for review, it's the first section, 1, 2, 3, 4, 10. So those are the 10 moves of the first section. Now the second part starts very similar. Now we have our right hand in front. We're going to now just move... Same thing, we're going to raise it up just like the first part, but now we're using the right hand. And now we're going to reach out and grapple the back of the neck. And then now we're going to grab this arm here, sink down with our elbow, sink down the elbow, sink down with your elbow here, flip to the bong sao, move sao. Okay, at the same time we're going to shift and then we're going to step over to the right corner here, shift, tan sao. So it's just the reverse of what we did. And then we're going to go step to the middle with our foot there, with the gong sao. Take a tiny step with the low bong sao, high tan sao.  And then we're going to do step back to the middle with gong sao. Then pivot to the center, we've got a cup sao and a gong sao again. And then we've got another cup sao, cup sao with the right and then it might bowl bai joe and then reset to the middle. So that is the sequence. And we're going to cover step by step how to do each one. Let's just cover the footwork. So we're going to our ee di kinyo ma, or a stance, I call it, hands out here. And let's just do the footwork. So we're going to move number one, either the same, the number two pivot, the three, stay the same, the fourth step, step and pivot. Okay, tiny step, step, pivot, step back to the middle, get together, and then finally move like that. So once again, maybe be together, pointing into a triangle, then we move number two, pivot, move the three, stay like this, number four, like that, move number five, move number six, tiny step, move number seven, move number eight, move number nine, move number ten. So those are moves, I hope you can see my feet. Let's just do it one more time. I'm going to see my feet here. Put my hand behind my back so I can see clearly. Number one, two, and three, five, six, seven, eight, nine, and ten. Okay, so that's how the foot works. So let's see how the hands work. Let's just move, do move one and two. Okay, hands move one and two. It is, so once again, one, two, two. So for one, I'm just raising my hands, reaching out to the dummy. I'm not actually punching, I'm just reaching out to the dummy, and this angle of my hand is meeting the arm. That's all I was doing. That's the first thing. Okay, so I'm not going out, I'm not going out to hit it, I'm just reaching out and then I just have to collide my forearm, this triangle the side of the triangle onto the forearm. Next move is I slide this one straight behind the dummy and then this one that ended up here comes down and grabs. Okay, so left hand goes out and grab, make sure that keep the elbow touching the dummy arm here. Second, the right hand is going to come from here to grab, here, grab, here, grab, keep, grab, so left hand out, right hand here, grab, here, grab. Okay, here you combine them two together, that'll be out, grab. So right hand's in front, it's going to come out and grab. Right hand was in front. So if you combine it with the footwork, it's going to be one, two. Notice that I shoot it. So it's one, my feet are going to go one, two. So now both feet are pointing diagonally this way. So when I go one, when I do that reach out, when I do two, that's when I, that's when I get it. Okay, just make it simpler. I'm just going to go one, two, three, that's the simplified version. So reach out one, two, get into this position, you have to grab back here, you grab here and three is when you pivot and sink. Just a simple line. One, two, three. One, two, three. Okay, so when I'm pivoting I'm sinking my elbow down on this dummy arm here and I'm sinking and then sinking my elbow down on this dummy arm here. Okay, so one, two, three. Okay, so technically it should be two moves, not three, but to simplify, we're simplifying it and making the three step. In reality it should be like this. One, two. So you do the grabbing and once you grab you sink at the same time, and then at the same time. Okay, let's continue. So we have one, two. One, two, that's with the hands. One, two. So it's one, you reach out to the center, two, you slide this from the inside of the arm, reach out to the back or the side of the dummy. This one is here, it goes down to here to grab and once you get into position you will grab and then sink your body. Okay, so two will be out. Two will be out. Sink. Out. Sink. Out. Sink. Okay, and then two and then I'll show you the feet of it. One, two. So in this position you're in your 70-30 stance. So you've got 70% of your weight is on your left foot and then 30% of your weight is on your right foot. Both of your feet are pointed diagonally this way. Some people like to go exactly 45 degrees. That's up to personal preference. You don't have to go exactly 45 degrees. I kind of go in between like 30 degrees or so. Okay, so some people say oh you have to be 45 degrees but I find that it's actually not good on your knees. So I go about less than 45. I go something like 25 to 30 degrees. Same thing when I do the pivoting. Some people say you have to go exactly 45 degrees but I find that it's more comfortable for me if I do like a 30 degrees.  Okay, so between 25 to 45 that was the maximum of the pivoting. And so together with the feet will be one, two. So as we do the two with the hands you're going to do the pivoting at the same time and sink your hips down. So that's the step one and two. One, two. So that's step one and two in the wooden dummy form in the second section. And come back in the next video, next lesson we'll show you the next steps. If you like this lesson make sure you click the like button and share it with your friends. And also subscribe and click the notification bell for all the latest lessons that are coming up. If you want to continue your training just click the next video to keep watching.


Freedom as some of you are aware we are currently looking for directors for this hub and others Which means that you have the opportunity to pitch shows that you think would fit the format that we're looking for If you're not quite sure what format we're looking for if you check that I you should be able to check out a video that explains what we're looking for and This is the first in what may become a longer series of me Going through some of the submissions and letting you know why they do or do not work Just a disclaimer this might be a little bit mean in some parts But keep in mind this is of course, you know, it is constructive criticism That's how I mean it and I hope that you know all the participants will take it that way They'll also have links in the description if you want to check them out So let's go ahead and get right on into this. I'm nervous The first pilot that we'll be looking at in this series is one from Kaiser Herzen Which is actually someone in the community that I do have respect for he's been in the community for quite some time But that doesn't necessarily mean I'm gonna go easy on him Just saying let's go ahead and roll a clip Hello there ladies and gentlemen, grand and dear and random viewer The very first thing that I notice is of course you greet your audience with something branded and unique But at about five seconds you do have kind of an awkward pause This can be fixed with a jump cut or by simply Re-recording that particular bit and moving forward from there. Thanks for joining me on this video of let's talk history cookies Moving ahead a few seconds at about seven seconds I see the first major gap especially when it comes to a pilot your head is cut off It looks like you're using chroma key or green screen as some people know it and your head is cut off Which means that the camera angle is In such a way that You know, you're just not getting all of yourself, especially as you move back and forth and up and down This is a mark of being a little bit nervous in front of the camera Then again, of course, there is some natural movement at all times of course, but you should compensate for this Let's go ahead and move forward and the topic of this video is Quotes that tempted fate the first story is about a passenger He's about to be a passenger aboard a ship at 16 seconds of this video You make another gaffe now This is something that lets me know that the video was not scripted or maybe not scripted well enough When you say that this is about a passenger who was a passenger this line probably should have been a gentleman Who was a passenger or a person who was a passenger? Of course, this isn't a huge deal breaker because as many of you are aware I am you know prone to a couple of on-screen mistakes makes you know However for a pilot this is definitely when you want to put your best foot forward This is when you want to make sure that everything comes across as you intended to with the inflection you intended to and of course You know that the delivery lands Unfortunately on-screen errors like this is going to make sure that the person watching or reviewing it doesn't Necessarily connect the way you're looking for and that's not true with just a pilot. That's true with anything you do here on YouTube That's not to mean that this kind of thing isn't okay for a vlog or maybe for a let's play But for something where you're trying to do polished hosted content Definitely something you want to avoid and before he boards. He says not even God can sink into this ship Well that passenger happened to be one of the passengers Board to the HMS Titanic the second story take at approximately 30 seconds you end your story about the HMS Titanic and You missed a really great opportunity to use Not just what you said, but how you say it to make your point You said this person happened to be a passenger on the HMS Titanic You moved directly on to the next thing as far as pacing goes That's actually a good thing. However as far as letting it sink into an audience Occasionally it is a lot more valuable to pause or to stress a syllable So that they let it sink in so for instance if I were to deliver this line And this gentleman happened to be a passenger on the HMS Titanic Whereas of course that is very much a me thing to do It's also recommended if you're going to let something sink in Stress the syllables that you want to stress to get the points across that you want to get across It takes place during the American Civil War and officers riding his horse into a battle and his sergeant goes Sir, would you please get down from the horse? There are sharpshooters around here to which the general replies The enemy they couldn't hit an elephant at this range Moments later he was shot and killed by a sharpshooter your second anecdote deals with a man riding a horse during battle and This I feel does fall a little bit flat I really feel that if you would have maybe given a little bit more detail about the battle about the day That this really would have been driven home a little bit more now That's not to mean that you should make it not so much of a quickie. I Just believe that if you would have scripted it a little bit better you would have probably found a way to Let the viewer feel a little bit more invested in this story if there's a moral to this story, it's never Tim today and These are actually historical phrases and quotes that actually happen I've noticed several times during this video You seem to look off-camera and you may be checking notes. However, I Would actually prefer as a presenter if you were to do something riddled with jump cuts where you actually looked into the lens Then something where you were looking off-camera and not making eye contact with your audience Not only that but you also Ended it somewhere around a minute and two seconds and said something along the lines of these are Phrases and sayings and things that actually happened. This is something that the audience should Automatically assume seeing as you're talking about historical quickies my advice as far as this is to Find some scripted way to do this because it kind of seems like you were just winging it Which is for some content a good thing to do other content like this something where you're supposed to be an authority Maybe not so thank you for joining me on this episode of let's talk history Quickies and I'll hope to see you in the next one soon. Thanks for watching. Thanks for stopping by happy learning And I'll see you next time one of the things to keep in mind about this exercise is the fact that we're not necessarily looking for someone who's going to put themselves on the screen though those who do it's Appreciated because we're looking for people who can connect on an emotional level often having something on the screen where you can Read somebody's body language facial expressions and that kind of thing is very valuable but also While doing that making sure that you use the most of those facial expressions those body languages That was kind of creepy is very important So Kaiser though, I do think that you are a very talented person I have to say that this pilot was denied for many of the reasons that I've already put Hopefully you've taken this as a constructive criticism if you'd like to see more of this series Let us know in the comment section down below and we'll explain more about what we're looking for and Of course why some of these things were either accepted or denied if you'd like to check out Kaiser herds and link in the description Where you could find his channel till next time don't forget to like subscribe and do all those things that make me love my job Also be awesome to yourself and amazing to each other. Bye for your family