We find it difficult to make our way back toward that communion, but because we are designed for it and because God desires it for us and is working to bring it about, once we begin to cooperate with God in that project, that mutual project, we see good results and good fruits coming from that. And that's really what the Orthodox Christian Church is all about, is helping that to happen in people's lives. That's why we're here, that's why we do what we do. Hello everyone, welcome to Simulation. I'm your host Alan Sokian. We are on site in the beautiful Sioux Falls, South Dakota. We are now going to be talking about Orthodox Christianity. We have Father Safa joining us on the show. Hi Father. Hi Alan. Thank you so much. Good to see you again my friend. Thank you for inviting me to your show. It's an honor to have you on. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. And for those that don't know, Father Safa Lida is a priest at the Transfiguration Greek Orthodox Church in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. He has been a priest for 16 years and you can find the links in the bio below to the TransfigurationGEOC.org as well as the Facebook page. Father Safa, let's start things off with one of our favorite questions to ask our guests. What are your thoughts on the direction of our world? I'll give a two-part answer Alan to that question, that good question. As an Orthodox Christian, I'm deeply optimistic about the ultimate direction of our world because it is the good creation of our God who loves us and desires that all should make their way back to him. And I believe that he is well able to accomplish that desire for all who are willing. And so in the long run I'm quite optimistic about the direction of the world. In the short one, however, I see that the world is in great turmoil, there's a lot of confusion, there's a lot of dysfunction, people are set against one another at all levels of society. Those who rule often take advantage of those who are ruled.  There's good indication that the natural environment is suffering because of our unwise actions in the last 100 years. I don't know about that myself, I'm not a scientist, but I look around and see what's happening and I have questions about that too. And so I think in the short run I am not optimistic about the future of the world. Our ability to re-commune with God, the divine, that can potentially heal so many of the issues that we have in our world. Absolutely, yes. We Orthodox Christians believe that we are designed by God our Creator for communion with God and with each other, which means the deepest possible healthy relationship. Mainly because of our own pride, but also because of the general brokenness of God's good creation, we find it difficult to make our way back toward that communion. But because we are designed for it and because God desires it for us and is working to bring it about, once we begin to cooperate with God in that project, that mutual project, we see good results and good fruits coming from that. And that's really what the Orthodox Christian Church is all about, is helping that to happen in people's lives. That's why we're here. That's why we do what we do. Could it be that the divine creation that is our world is meant for this beautiful journey that we go through in realizing that we all come from God and re-communing with that? Is that the purpose of this creation? Indeed, yes. The Apostle Paul writes that the whole of creation is groaning with longing for the revealing of the children of God, by which he means exactly what we're talking about, the renewal of our God-designed communion with our Creator, God the Holy Trinity. Yes, indeed. So we emphatically do believe that. And we see that not only theoretically is that the case, but in actual fact when we begin to live in the way that the Church teaches for us to live in humility, in love, in self-denial, in putting others ahead of ourselves, considering ourselves the least of all, then this really starts to pick up some momentum and we see the healing of God's creation beginning with ourselves because human beings are the crown of God's good creation. And creation is broken precisely through our brokenness as a result of our brokenness. So when we begin to be healed and we see parts of the world around us beginning to be healed as well. It's not an accident, for example, that if you go to an Orthodox Christian monastery, you will usually find the buildings to be surrounded by beautiful plants of various kinds, flowers and trees and so forth resembling an earthly paradise. And so that where prayer is active, where people are drawing close to God, that has repercussions in the natural world around us. And when we all have our unique communions with God, there are different healing processes that occur for each of us due to what we've been dealt since we were born. What would we say is a good healing modality, methodology? The church in her wisdom offers us a variety of means of being healed, of the corruption, to use a very strong word, the corruption that leads to death and the disintegration of our being.  And in fact he gave himself over to death. He the deathless one, the one who cannot die, died as a man in order to destroy death and open to us the possibility of living deathlessly. And so we Orthodox Christians say that death does not truly exist.  We can't say a lot of that about that because we have not experienced it directly but that we will be reunited with our bodies which will be incorruptible. That is that they won't be subject to death, decay, disease and so forth. All the things that afflict us now. Now how do we get from here to there? Which is really your question I think. The church invites us first of all as our Lord Jesus Christ says if anyone would be my disciple, if anyone wants to walk with me, let him deny himself, take up his cross and follow me. And so a life of constant repentance to use a Christian word that is of constant turning away from the way that leads to death and turning back toward God who is the creator and giver of life. That's what repentance really means. A life of constant repentance which means self-denial. A denial of our desire to exalt ourselves as the devil exalted himself and rebelled against God. So we turn away from that desire and in repentance we humble ourselves and we take up our own cross and follow Jesus Christ. Now what is my cross? That can vary from person to person but I would say that my cross consists of the things in my life that are either sent by God or permitted by God in order to bring me to salvation, to healing and health and communion with God. And that's a different thing for each person because we're broken in different ways aren't we? And so our Lord in his goodness and with his comprehensive knowledge of us, because he knows us better than we know ourselves, sends just what is needed for us. Some of those things are very hard. That's what we call them crosses. So the challenges are viewed as crosses. Even the sufferings, yes. Because God sees what we need to experience and to endure in order to be fixed, in order to be healed. He sees precisely that and that's what he's always offering to us. And if we're able to receive that with gratitude and humility from God then it will do the intended work in us. If we rebel against it and complain against it then it will just make us bitter and angry probably and lead to more misery and brokenness and death you see. So that's what our Lord is inviting us to do when he says take up your cross. That is accept these things that are being offered to you for your salvation from my hand. And you use this word rejection of the self, the self-denial and meaning being self-less, being also understanding the illusion of the self, the unity of everything and the perpetual servitude that one can be in towards humanity, towards our world and then that being one of the most, if not the most divine, then calling. Yes, we could say it this way maybe that each human heart has a tendency to create idols. That is false gods, gods that do not exist and have no power to deliver us from anything but rather deliver us only into slavery and to servitude, to nothingness. And one of those false gods is our ego, our tendency to exalt ourselves and to set ourselves up as the criterion of everything that is real, that is good and to serve ourselves alone and to organize our whole existence around serving our own ego. So that is perhaps the first idol that has to go, that has to be destroyed. And after that, there are many other idols that we manufacture for ourselves. That is another aspect of the project of living as an Orthodox Christian is that we seek to worship only the Creator, not the creature, not what he has created, including ourselves and beginning with ourselves, you see. Interesting. So God is uncreated. Uncreated, yes. And we are created creatures. Yes, yes. God is the only uncreated one. God exists eternally as one God in three persons, one eternal being who has revealed himself to us in three persons, co-equal, co-eternal, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. The famous Holy Trinity. The Holy Trinity, yes. That's not something that human beings have made up. If one was to, I suppose, to come up with some kind of conception of God, I really doubt that he would come up with something like the Holy Trinity. And I think that is, for me at least, an argument in favor of the accuracy and reality of this revelation of God, his self-revelation. He has revealed himself to us as one God in three persons as an eternal uncreated communion of three persons. The Father, who is the source of the divinity, the eternal being. The Son, who is co-eternal with the Father, who is begotten from the Father eternally so that there was never a time, never up when, when he did not exist. And the Holy Spirit, who proceeds from the Father. And together with the Father and the Son, is eternally worshiped and glorified. This is how we are taught to speak of God, to name God. And so we can say that the name of the God that Christians worship is the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. But we are not trithiists, we are monotheists. We worship one God, but who has revealed himself to us in this way and taught us to name him in this way. Does that make sense? It's always in perpetual kindergarten. Yes, and we're talking here about things that are at the edge of our possibility to speak of, you understand, you know. Our language fails not far beyond this point. There's nothing really more that we can say about God or know about God in his eternal being than what we've just said, that he is Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. Now, as God reveals himself to us in time, in history, by, through the incarnation, by the second person of the Holy Trinity, the Son of God, the eternal Son of God, taking on our flesh from the Holy Virgin Mary and becoming a human being, a real human being, while at the same time being God, we can say a thing, a lot of things about that, that revelation of God, because our Lord Jesus Christ not only was born into the world as one of us and grew up as we all did, you know, and became a man gradually, but he endured all the things that we endure, all the vicissitudes of life, the changes and chances of life, as an old prayer says, as we do endure. But he was not diminished by any of it. In becoming a man, he certainly humbled himself. Being God, he humbled himself. And this is the great paradox and beauty of the Christian faith, is that God is not someone far away from us who, in arbitrary ways, exercises power over us in ways that we can't understand and that just frustrate us and make us angry. No, that's not who God is. God has revealed himself to us in Jesus Christ as a man and as a God at the same time and as the God above all who loves us and who gives himself for us, even unto death. So that's the center of our Christian faith. That's what it's all about. And this is another reason why then this Jesus Christ is key because then it gives us a greater idea of what our divine reality is. Yes. Yes. In Jesus Christ we learn who God is. If we want to know what God is like, we don't speculate, we don't philosophize, but we look at the books of the Gospels, the four Gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John, and reading those Gospels together with the letters of Apostle Paul and the other writings in the New Testament, we see who Jesus Christ is. We see who God is in Jesus Christ. And so if we want to know who God is, everything that we need to know about God is revealed in him. In Jesus Christ. And what was written about Jesus Christ through the teachings? Well, the Gospels are four in number and they describe the life of Jesus Christ telling pretty much the same story, but from different points of view. St. Mark wrote the first Gospel, it is believed, simply because his is the shortest. We don't know that his was the first, but much of his Gospel is included in the Gospels of St. Matthew and St. Luke. With additional material, for example, all the stories that we hear at Christmas about the conception of Jesus Christ, the birth of Jesus Christ and so forth, those are in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke. My material is not in Mark's Gospel, it is not in John's Gospel. So each of them differs in its contents, even though it tells the same story, it is like you know you have four witnesses to an event, something happens and four people are standing at different places and they are eyewitnesses to this event. Do you think they will tell exactly the same story when they are interviewed later? Well, only if they get together in a room and decide on the story, otherwise they are going to tell it differently from their different point of view. And also we believe that each of the writers of the Gospels was writing for a particular early Christian group, a community, a church, a local church, and told the story to serve the needs of that early Christian community. This is where the game of telephone begins. This is where, so then the signal is over time, we're trying to retain as much of that initial lineage as possible, because 2,000 years later it's really, there's a lot of the game of telephone has been played for a long time, so we're trying to get back to that initial lineage. Yeah, I like that metaphor very much because we've all played that game or something similar and we know what happens in a very short time is that the message becomes distorted almost beyond recognition sometimes in a very short time. Great care was taken by the first Christians that this should not happen. Now, things weren't written down for quite a while after the Lord Jesus Christ walked the earth. It's a fact that the Bible itself, as we have it now, as a collection of books of distinct writings, was not really organized until maybe the end of the fourth century, if I recall correctly, and had the official approval of the church as a collection of books and letters to be read in the churches. Before that, these things circulated by word of mouth, first of all, these stories about the life and teachings and death and resurrection of Jesus Christ among the early Christian communities. Much of the New Testament is letters that were written, for example, by Apostle Paul in his apostolic work, where he traveled a lot throughout the Mediterranean areas and began Christian communities in those places. And then as he traveled on to the next place, sometimes he would write a letter back to the group of first Christians that he had established in another place. And so these letters and many, many other writings too, for that matter, circulated in the early years of Christianity. And eventually some of them were approved by the leaders of the church, the bishops, meeting in council, as being the ones that ought to be read in church. The others maybe were good for reading, such as a document called the Didache, the teaching of the Twelve Apostles. It didn't make it into the New Testament, but it's very good to read. It's full of good wisdom and also a document called the Shepherd of Hermes, a man called Hermes. And writings like this are within the tradition of the church, but not included in the New Testament. That is, they're not read in the services of the church. And that's the distinction of what is Holy Scripture, what is read during the services of the church. Now, as we aim to then document God revealing himself through Jesus Christ, as we try and document that, what were some of the key things that were documented about God being revealed through Jesus Christ? Well, to answer that, I could simply refer you to the four gospels, because it's all there. But his conception, his miraculous conception without human seed, without a human father. It's the teaching of the church as recorded in the gospels that he was conceived of the Virgin Mary. She was a young woman. She had lived a very sheltered life after being born of aged parents, like many of the people in the Old Testament were, kind of miraculously, absolutely miraculously, born of a couple that were beyond the normal time of childbearing. That's not written in the gospel, by the way, that her parents were old and had her in old age. That's part of the memory of the church that was not written down in the gospels. But she was born in that way. And then at a certain time, she was taken under the protection of an old man called Joseph, who was a kinsman of hers. And they were betrothed simply because in that time, a woman who was growing up needed to be under the protection of a man. And indeed in the societies in that part of the world today, in the Middle East, it's still the case that each woman lives her life with a man as her point of reference. In the Arab societies, for example, that's the way it is. So she conceived, she bore a son, and he was called Jesus Christ according to the words of the angel who revealed this to her. That's what's recorded in the New Testament. Immediately when the world took notice of this, the powers of the world and the person of the Roman governor of the area tried to find the child and put him to death because he thought that he was a threat to earthly authority. And indeed he was. Later on, his own people, the leaders of his own people would seek to put him to death and in the end they would succeed in handing him over to be crucified by the Roman authorities. Because again, he was a threat perceived by them as a threat to their established authority and way of doing things. And so this began very early on when he was still a baby. And it said that he and his mother and his guardians, St. Joseph, had to flee to Egypt all the way to Egypt to escape the threat of being done to death by the soldiers sent by King Herod. And so his life was always lived in danger from the beginning. So he grew up and he emerged into the world, into the public eye, we could say, with the event of his baptism by a man called John who was baptizing people in the Jordan River, offering them baptism as a sign of repentance, of turning back toward God. And St. John was sent by God to prepare his way, that is to prepare the people's hearts for God's appearance in their midst. And one day, while John was baptizing people, that is immersing them in the water of the Jordan, Jesus Christ appeared to be baptized with the other people. And John recognized who he was. He knew that he was the Messiah, the promised savior of Israel, promised through the prophets. And he said, it's not right that I should baptize you. No, I'm not worthy to do this. But Jesus Christ says, it's okay, you should do this. I want you to do this in order to fulfill all righteousness, that is to show people the right way to do things. And our word in all things is an example to us of how to do things properly. And so even though he didn't need to be cleansed, he didn't need to be baptized, he didn't need to repent of anything, because he was perfectly sinless, nevertheless he submitted to be baptized. And when he was baptized, it says, the heavens opened. And the voice, a voice came forth saying, this is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased. This is the voice of God, the Father, that everyone heard. According to one gospel, everybody heard it. According to another gospel, only he heard it. But in any case, the voice came forth. And then the Holy Spirit, represented in the form of a dove, a bird, came down and alighted upon him. Now, the Father is not a voice, the Father is not a sound, the Holy Spirit is not a bird. Neither the Father nor the Holy Spirit became incarnate, that is joined themselves to our created world. But on that occasion, their presence was testified to by this voice and by this bird. And what did the voice say, this is my beloved son, in whom I am well pleased. And so in this way, God revealed himself right off the bat, when our Lord Jesus Christ was baptized. After that he went around doing good. He preached to the people, good news, that the kingdom of God was very near. That is, God isn't far away, he hasn't forgotten you.  And as a demonstration of that love, Jesus Christ healed people of physical diseases. He healed them of spiritual diseases in the form of being possessed by demons sometimes. He cast the demons out. They had no defense against him because he is their creator and he has authority over them. And so he freed people from physical illness, from spiritual illness. He also spoke to those in authority who were abusing their authority, weren't serving the people in love as God had appointed them to do. People like the priests of the time, of the Jewish people. The people called the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the scribes. These were groups of people who were in positions of honor and authority over the people, but they weren't doing their job properly at that time. And so our Lord Jesus Christ rebuked them and called them to repentance especially. And he preached good news to the poor, as it says, liberation to the captives. And for everyone, he had a word of salvation to speak. And he would say the word that each person needed to hear in order to begin their journey back to God. Often his teaching was in the form of stories that we call parables. One of the most famous is the parable of the prodigal son, a younger brother of two brothers who lived in his father's house but decided that he didn't want to live there anymore. And he asked his father to divide what would be his inheritance between him and his brother so that he could have it now. He was really in essence asking his father to act as though he were already dead and to give him the money that would come to him in that case. The father very humbly did so, even knowing what kind of disaster was likely to follow. And indeed the younger brother, the son, goes into a foreign land where nobody knows him. And he spends all of the money on riotous living, it says, and we can imagine what he did with it. He went through it very quickly and he finds himself destitute and gets a job from one of the local people feeding pigs, which is about the worst thing that can happen to a Jew. Because pigs and Jews don't mix, they don't associate with pigs much less eat them.  He's hungry, he's tired, he's lonely. Well, what has happened? Really, he represents our human nature that has turned away from God and wandered to a distant land, a far away land, and has spent its life on vanity, on nothing basically, you know, and finds itself destitute, naked, hungry, cold, lonely. And not only that, but in bondage to the demons, you know, represented by the pigs. But a miracle happens then. In the story, the young man says, why am I here? He comes to himself, it says, he returns to himself. He says, why am I here?  Why am I here? I don't have to be here. I can swallow my pride, I can stand up, and I can start the long journey back to my father's house. And he makes a little plan. He says, when I get there, I'm going to say to my father, father, I've sinned against heaven and before you, I'm not worthy anymore to be called your son. Please make me as one of your hired servants. And this is his plan. And as he goes on the road toward his father's house, he rehearses this little speech that he wants to make. But he never gets to make it. Because as soon as his father catches sight of his son returning, and we get the sense that he's been watching for him ever since he left, the father runs out to greet him, and he embraces him. And the son starts to make the speech, father, I have sinned before heaven and before earth.  The father is immediately calling his servants to bring fine clothing for the boy, a ring for him, shoes for his feet, clean him up, prepare a banquet because my son was lost and now he's found. He was dead, now he's alive. And so he makes this marvelous feast. There's another part of the story about the older brother, the son who stayed at home. And his response to this event of the return of the younger brother, do you suppose he's happy to see his brother? No, not at all. Not at all. He's something outside the house while he hears all the party going on. And he asks one of the servants, well, what's going on? He said, well, your brother's come back and your dad is throwing a party. And he goes into the father. The father comes out to him, excuse me, just as he came out to the younger son. If I remember correctly, the father comes out and says, what's the matter, my son?   He's bitter and he's angry.  And what does the father say to him? To show his love, which is as great for that son as it is for the other one, he says, my son, you're always with me. All that I have is yours. Was it not right that when your brother came back, we should, we should rejoice because he was dead. He's resurrected from the dead, practically speaking. So that's how the story ends. I hope I've told it accurately. But you get the gist. It's beautiful and simple and yet immensely powerful. We can all relate to it just on the literal level and also in the broader way of seeing how it describes our corrupted human nature and its restoration in Christ. So this is how our Lord taught the people. Wow. The amount of story that exists that has so many profound learning lessons embedded in them is just gorgeous. And to be able to go back and to, and to take these stories and to find deep meaning in them in driving our own ethical and moral and spiritual evolution ourselves because hearing things like that make us reflect on our own behavior and seek out a more righteous way of living. And also coming like you described as well, this God revealing himself through Jesus Christ and then our documenting of the way that Jesus Christ is healing and is bringing this light onto others and then having others be able to commune back and go through that process of realizing divinity. So let's explore the Holy Spirit. What is the Holy Spirit? We speak of our Lord the Holy Spirit as the third person of the Holy Trinity, along with the Father and the Son, co-eternal, co-equal, uncreated, who in the creed, which is this great statement of faith that was composed by the church by the fourth century, it was completed, the creed speaks of the Holy Spirit as the Lord the giver of life who spoke by the prophets. So the Holy Spirit speaks through the prophets of the Hebrew times, the Old Testament times in order to correct the people and to recalibrate them, we could say, from time to time. And they always needed recalibrating, as all of us do, because we get kind of wonky, you know, we go astray and we need to be recalibrated. That is the work of our Lord the Holy Spirit, and also to proclaim through the prophets the coming of God in the flesh, Jesus Christ. That is his job too. Now after the incarnation, in the time now of the church, the Holy Spirit empowers, first of all, the apostles to go out into all the world and proclaim the death of death in Jesus Christ, to proclaim the possibility of the restoration of human nature from its corruption and the death of death so that we have the possibility of eternal life with God. Now these apostles, with the exception of St. Paul, were not educated men. And several of them were fishermen. No, they were just ordinary, humble people. How did they receive the gifts that they needed to go out and do this mighty work, to go out to distant lands and places where they did not even know the local language and speak to the people about these things in such a way that they received the Word? It was by the power and the gifts of the Holy Spirit. So the Holy Spirit, its job simply is to continue to bear witness to God's revelation of Himself in Jesus Christ. Yeah, that's who the Holy Spirit is. And we don't say a lot more about him than that because he hasn't become incarnate, just as the Father hasn't become incarnate. And so in the beautiful icon or holy picture of the three angels drawn by St. Andrei Rublyov in medieval times, which is one of the great treasures of Russia, we see three angels. And allegorically, they represent the three persons of the Holy Trinity. We don't say they are the Holy Trinity because the Father and the Holy Spirit can be depicted because they've never taken on flesh. But nevertheless, the Son, the central angelic figure, is very solid looking, very opaque in the way that St. Andrei Rublyov has drawn him, painted him. Whereas the other two figures that may correspond, we may say to the Father and to the Holy Spirit, are more ethereal, more translucent almost, to indicate that they never were incarnate. And so that's kind of a way of indicating through the means of a painting the truth of who God is. So this leads us to then asking one of, I think, the most important questions here, which is that how do we have this religious pluralism all coexist? That we have this idea of God or Source, that all of us have our own unique relationship with recommuning with that. And there's all different religions. There's even science that says this comes from a big bank, 13.8 billion years ago. How do you see these things coexisting? Sure, that's the big question. One of the big questions of our time, isn't it? When the world's population is being stirred up, so to speak, and because of the great mobility that we have had in the last century and a half, let's say, that really did not exist before that, at least not to the degree that we have it now. People are moving about and encountering one another and having to live side by side in ways that they never did before. And so it represents an immense opportunity for all of us to be enriched by the wisdom of one another. But I'm afraid that more often what happens is that we enter into conflict with each other because of different cultural assumptions, different beliefs, different allegiances. So for example, one of the great forces in the world today, alongside Christianity, is Islam, which is a very different way of understanding God, the world, human nature, human destiny, from the Christian way of understanding these things. It's a different revelation, a revelation of a very different character which creates a culture of a very different character from Christian culture. It may be that these two cultures are irreconcilable. I personally believe that Christian culture and Muslim culture have a lot to say to each other, and in fact they have lived side by side in many places in the world for centuries. However, it is a fact that wherever the Muslim culture is the dominant culture, Christians are placed in a lower level. They have great social disabilities placed on them. Millions of them have been martyred in the Muslim lands from the time of the conquest after Muhammad until today. It's still going on, and we dare not brush this under the rug or pretend that all is sweetness and light because it's not. The borders between Christianity and Islam are almost always bloody. However, Christians and Muslims have succeeded in living together in peace in various places where they have a rough parity of population sizes, and they've found ways to live together in peace, but usually not by living next door to one another in the same town, usually by having villages that are Christians, ones that are Muslim, and so forth. There are sections of a city where the different homogenous populations will settle. Here in America it's very different because anybody can buy a house next to anybody else. It's very easy for a Christian to buy a house next to a Muslim and vice versa, and so we must find a way to live together here. I think that is a project that's worthy of our greatest effort and greatest attention. That same analogy must be also seen at that global level, similarly of like we need to learn how to live together on this planet. Absolutely, we do. I'm not optimistic of our chances for doing that because I think if we speak developmentally about human nature, we are designed to live in tribes for want of a better word. That's how we function best among people who are like ourselves who share our worldview, our values, our religious traditions, and so forth. That's how we function most effectively. It seems to me anyway. I'm just offering my own opinion here. I think we have great difficulties in the modern world because we are not, we could say designed or we're not adapted, we could say maybe, to function alongside, to live alongside people who have very different assumptions about reality than we do. We're just not adapted for that, it seems to me, and so that's why we have such difficulty I think. It's not that it's impossible, we can do it, and I think as Christians we are obliged to try to humble ourselves and to live with others in peace as much as we can, but at the same time we're not obliged to allow people who do not value what we value and are not interested in living in peace with us to invade our land and supplant us. We're not obliged to do that, and so it's finding the way between those two that I think is important for us in the world as it is.  Very difficult history. What about Taoism and Buddhism and Hinduism and these others that have also had issues, but also that seem to have these deep roots in just the most meditative, flow-driven being? Yes. Well, as an Orthodox Christian I would say that God has revealed himself in many and various ways, as it says in the letter to the Hebrews in the New Testament. He has revealed himself in many and various ways throughout human history, and in Hebrews it speaks specifically of his revelation of himself through the prophets of Israel, but I believe that we can extend that revelation to include all of the ancient philosophical and religious traditions of mankind, not that any of them is complete, but that each of us, each of them, in each of them we can perhaps recognize foreshadowings of God's complete revelation of himself in Jesus Christ. There are many things in those traditions that we would not recognize or accept as Orthodox Christians. For example, the egregious polytheism that exists in Hinduism, where various attributes of divinity are, I guess we could say, reified or identified with a particular supposed deity, so you have this proliferation of thousands of supposed deities. That's a mistake, we think. That's not accurate to reality, but at the same time, for example, the life cycle has been a long time since I studied these things, but the idea of there being seasons in a human's life. There's the season when you're young and you're learning to be a human being.  There's a season when you are a worker primarily, and there's a season then in old age where you're preparing yourself for death for your departure from this world. I'm sorry, I can't remember the specifics of the terminology. I studied these things as an undergraduate lifetime ago, but you understand what I'm talking about. I think that's a very profound and helpful way of speaking about human life because we do change as we grow older and we experience different identities almost, you could say, as we make our way through our life in this world. That idea that at the end we should consciously withdraw from active life and devote ourselves to the preparation for what comes next. And we might as Christians speak differently about what comes next than Hindus would, for example, or Buddhists or Taoists or whatever, but that idea of that schema of human life I think is something that resonates with me very strongly because I'm about to, I hope, retire from active human life in a few years and devote myself to getting ready for what comes next. May God grant it. I loved how you described God revealing himself through such a beautiful variety of potentials and how then it's in the essences and eyes and feelings of the seekers that are seeking that communion with God revealing himself that then are able to identify all these different potential modalities. I want to also express how and hear how you feel about this, that then some of the seekers are attempting to then commune with God expressing himself through science, through mathematics, and attempting to do so by understanding the at the most granular level how the even subatomic particles work, how the inner workings of our biological mechanisms work. And so these are kind of like the absolute like diver deepers into all the mechanics and trying to understand the source code of creation. So in a sense that's also communing with God revealing himself through math and through science. And so that's another one of those coexist. Can that coexist? Could that potentially help bridge together all of the religious pluralism with science, could science and spirituality marry together? And then how do you feel about all that? Well that's a lot to try to get my arms around. It's a big question Alan, but I'll give it a shot. You know I think it was Blaise Pascal, the renaissance philosopher and Christian believer, faithful Christian, who said that scientific investigation is thinking God's thoughts after him, if I'm remembering correctly. And I've always kind of liked that phrase, thinking God's thoughts after him, because God being the creator of all, as we Christians believe him to be, he's described in the scriptures in the Gospel of Saint John with the word logos, the word which means word or reason or speech. This Greek word logos is often left untranslated and of course it's the word that's at the root of many of our words, theology, the logos of God, psychology, the logos of the human soul, the reason or the teaching or the inner workings of, the created reality of.  God said let there be light and there was light. It says famously in the first chapter of the Bible in Genesis. So I think that these things naturally, it's natural to try to consider these things together. However I would say that the things being revealed by scientific investigation are becoming so numerous that it's impossible for one person to know them, to begin with, only a very small part of them. God's creation is so vast and so both at the macaron micro level that it's impossible for the finite human mind to grasp it, which I think is evidence for God's being, myself. I think the best scientist is the one who is the most humble intellectually, who always thinks of his or her work as being provisional and being susceptible to be replaced by something else that is discovered or a better understanding and always to need to be tested by empirical verification if it's possible. So in all these ways I see that the pursuit of science, which means knowledge, it comes from the Latin word, which simply means knowledge of the truth, the true nature of things, if it's done honestly and humbly according to the scientific method itself, is in no way opposed to our view of how the world is or how God is. Truth is one, I like to say. Truth is one as God is one and any honest pursuit of truth will lead to the same place, to the same truth. That's how I see these things. I'm not sure I answered your question, but this is how I think about these things, but I don't know anything about them really. I'm just one person who looks at the world and tries to make sense of things like everybody else. Question along the way on that subject would be then how about then the story of orthodox Christianity in terms of God's creation versus what science says about the evolution of humanity from our ancestors, from the Big Bang to the atoms and the planets of stars and then from single-cell to multi-cell organisms etc. I'm going from a kind of an undifferentiated, very simple but highly energetic reality to a much more differentiated and complex and environment in which the energy is more dispersed than it was at the beginning, which if I understand correctly is kind of how scientists now are looking at things. I don't know a lot about that, but I read a little bit. It seems to me that that is not in any way at odds with what we believe as orthodox Christians about God's creation of the world from the beginning until now, and incidentally when we speak of creation we don't just mean of God's creating the initial conditions or the initial stuff, but we mean a continuing process by which God's uncreated energy keeps, maintains the world in existence, keeps it going from moment to moment. If it didn't, everything would fall apart. We know the tendency in the physical world is not toward increased complexity and differentiation, but when the energy is drawn out of it, it collapses into dust, entropy, if I understand things correctly. And so it seems to me that in order for the world to be maintained in being this creative energy, uncreated energy, uncreated creative energy, if we can say so, or God's preserving energy, we could term it maybe, must continually be injected into the world. The world has to be suffused with this energy, otherwise it would collapse back into nine being. That's my understanding of things. There are other orthodox Christians who would take issue with what I just said probably, which doesn't bother me at all. The church has no official teaching on these things. We say that we believe in one God who created the heavens and the earth, and that's all that we're obliged to believe formally about these things. The church doesn't teach us how old the world is, for example, when it began. It teaches that the world began by God's will and by His action. That this world will, as it is now, will come to an end at some point, not only to God. And we live in between those times as best we can. And maybe even one of the recent beautiful ways of seeing what God potentially is that I've really enjoyed is that we, as we evolve towards complexity, that we then have the ability to then take the initial substrate, that created creation, and then embed that in our complexity to cycle another creation. And then that is just a cyclical process of God. Yes, we were talking about that the other day, weren't we? As Christians, we understand history pretty much linearly, as I mentioned a minute ago, from its beginning to its end point. And then all of it, though, contained, if we can put it this way, within the realm of eternity, which is not like our existence now. You know, we live historically now, yesterday, today, tomorrow. Maybe tomorrow, we don't know. All we have, the only time we have really is now, this moment when we're talking with each other. We don't know whether there will be a next moment or not. And so that's how Christians generally think of or understand reality. However, within that linear span of history and within that eternal now of eternity, can there be recurring cycles? And I would say certainly, if we read the books of the Old Testament, the history of Old Israel, for example, we see cycles of flourishing of return to God and faith in God and trust in God and a reaping of the benefits of all that in the daily lives of the people. And then we see that degenerating into times of apostasy, of fleeing from God, fleeing toward idols created by men's hands and so forth, and the slavery that the people experience as the result of that. Not freedom, but slavery. And then they need to repent of that and return to God. God sends prophets to remind them of who they are, who God is. They repent sometimes, return to God. So there is that cyclical action going on, you could say, I think, in each of our lives too. We often say in orthodoxy that the Christian life is one of continuous repentance, not just initial repentance when we turn back. But when the prodigal son has returned to his father's house, he needs to be watchful over himself and make sure when he needs to repent again in small things that he does so that he's not tempted to do another big rebellion and find himself in the midst of swine, hungry and gold and naked and so forth. So those are just a few thoughts in response to your good question. Yes, yes, thank you. What about the creation having both good and evil and then the interplay of those two within our lives? Yes, that's a question that has preoccupied human beings always, I think, good and evil, the mystery of good and evil. As God has revealed himself to us, we orthodox Christians believe that God is good and that God doesn't change. That means that if God was good in the beginning, God is still good, we can rely on God being good tomorrow and of God being favorably disposed toward us. He's for us. He's on our side, we can say. God does not change. In our work of salvation, it's not our job to change God's mind. That doesn't mean to happen because God is always for us. And I say this because this distinguishes us as Eastern Orthodox Christians from some varieties of Western Christianity where the project seems to be precisely to change God's mind either by doing good works that you'll see and then you'll be favorably disposed toward us or by interposing Jesus Christ between us and God the Father who is angry with us and wants to get us so that he will see his son and the goodness and beauty of his son and then changes mind about us. This seems to be the project of certain kinds of Western Christianity, but we don't see that in orthodoxy at all. If we in the Bible or in some of the prayers and hymns of the church, we talk about God being angry with us, it's metaphorical. It's to remind us that this is serious business, that though God is for us, we must be willing for God to do his good work of healing and recreation within our lives. If we're not willing, God being very humble and gentle will not run over us and force us because if you force someone, it's not love. It's no longer love. It's coercion or oppression. You see. We understand that God is always for us. He's always making himself available to us very humbly, but we must open the door. We must invite him in to do his good work in us. Where does evil come from then? God does not create evil. That's clearly the teaching of the Christian Church of the East and the West. God does not create evil. We create it through our ignorance. We create it through our ignorance and through our rebellion, our fruitless rebellion against reality really, against God who only wills good things for us. Yes, in those ways we create it for ourselves. And it makes for a good story that we created it for ourselves. It makes it more challenging. There are such stories in the Bible beginning with the story of our first created man and woman, our first parents, Adam and Eve, which is a powerful story if we understand that it is the story not just of the first humans, but of every one of us.   It's documented in the scriptures. It's documented in history. It's documented by our own consciousness of how we are, each of us. If we come to the knowledge of that, then we're not living in obliviousness. We'll come to the knowledge of that, and we'll wake up and we'll say, we'll come to ourselves and we'll say, I will arise and go to my Father's house. Yeah. Yeah. How gorgeous it is that we all get to experience life and consciousness and all of these beautiful gifts of family and friends and food, water, air, all these types of things. And all these things are good, very good gorgeous as he creates everything. Wake up to how beautiful it is. Divinely commune back with me. What role, then, at all these bifurcating moments of choice that we have of pursuing a certain thing or pursuing another one, these potential choices, not always binary and good and evil, but they're altering moments in our life trajectory. What role does free will play in those choices and where does determinism fall into the picture? Yes. Well, we understand as Orthodox Christians that we each have a choice. Sometimes it's very difficult for us to choose God, to choose the way that leads back to God. It's not easy for the prodigal son to get up from the mud in the midst of the pigs and say, I will arise and go to my father's house. It's not easy. And sometimes it's a lot harder than others in the case of someone who is enslaved, for example, to some kind of addiction. It's very hard, very hard to break out of that slavery. God will help, but we have to really want it. We have to really want it and we have to make our own feeble effort to enlist the help of others whom God sends to us. But it is always possible for us to choose the good, to know the good and to choose the good. Someone asked me just yesterday, what about in the case of a person who is a psychopath? Is there a possibility of repentance and redemption for such a person? In other words, could such a person be healed? By having that part of the personality that is missing or is corrupted to be restored? I said theoretically yes, but how often does it happen? Possibly yes. We have to believe that everyone has the possibility of being restored, having the image of God in which he has created or she has created to be restored and perfected to its original beauty. But sometimes it's very hard to see how that happens, at least in human terms. But with God everything is possible. Often in Orthodoxy we speak of the life of a human being in Christ as being cleaned or cleansed of the things that don't belong purified, the things that don't belong on us and in us in our lives. Just as maybe a picture, an icon that has hung in a church for centuries, maybe somewhere in Eastern Europe, has been there for five centuries, let's say a holy picture, it's not the way the artist painted it. Well it is, but it's all covered with soot from candles and lamps and incense and all, and just dust for centuries and centuries and so you can hardly see what's there, what the painter put there. So what needs to happen to that picture?  No, no it needs to be purified, it needs to be cleansed so it can shine with its original beauty that it's maker intended. And that's a perfect analogy I think for us, what has to happen for us, that we must allow our Lord the Holy Spirit to do His good work in us, which is sometimes very painful. The process of the restoration of a picture is fraught with many dangers, to push the analogy maybe a little further, it might hurt us to be cleansed because some of these things have become so much a part of us that we come to believe this is who we are. We identify ourselves as that which we are not, that which doesn't belong in us, and so it can be very painful to have those things generally being removed, but that's what must happen if we are to shine with our original beauty, just like the restoration of a beautiful painting takes place with great care and gentleness and an attempt not to damage anything of the original that remains. And when it's finished, I saw a video on YouTube just the other day so I'm thinking about that renaissance painting that was restored in just that way at the end, the various places where the image had just disappeared, it had flaked off. After they got done cleaning the whole thing and gluing it all together again, the restorer took a fine brush and some paints and just gently painted in those parts again, very respectfully and not in any kind of ostentatious way, but with the idea to reproduce the original, recreate the original, so everything would function harmoniously again. It was a miracle to see really, and that's the miracle that can happen for us too. I really love the analogy of the painting that is very, very, very well dusted off and cleansed, although that process may, it's clearing our channel to anchor the divine, there may be some triggers or traumas in that process that we can integrate and we can repair those in order for us to heal and not repeat. And as we do that process, it's also a good analogy, it's just like a gem, very similarly with the gem where we're cleaning the gem, we're making the gem able to shine. And the gem is like us individually being able to bring our gifts forth into the world and have the sunlight shine through the gem and break apart into a prism and just shine on the planet with our unique gifts. And so I love that analogy and it does not come without hard, sincere self-work and connection to the divine in that process. Certainly, and always with God's help, yes. Jesus Christ says, I am the light of the world. He who believes in me will not walk in darkness but have the light of life. He also says to us, you are the light of the world, a city set on a hill that cannot be hid. And so we can think of the analogy perhaps of the sun, the word Jesus Christ being the sun, the source of light and life and warmth and all good things and we being like the moon who reflect that light to the degree that we have been purified and illumined by his by his light, by his grace, his power to illuminate and to save. That's gorgeous. That's gorgeous. And then there may even be we could say that the more that we've been purified our channel that the more we are like the full moon that can then reflect so much of that sunlight onto earth and maybe the more we have oil within the water that the more it's like the new moon where there's less light being able to be reflected. What is it like running the church? There's a process of going to seminary school. There's a process of becoming a deacon then becoming a priest and then for those that would like to becoming a bishop which oversees regional churches and priests and deacons act as helpers. So how does this all work? And then there's you know communities in the areas that are Christian that come to the churches to do the practice and you engage with dozens if not even up to hundreds of people and act as someone that's trained in the divine to help them with their communions. This is a beautiful thing and it's also complex and I'd love for you to talk about it. I'll try. I'll try. It is a beautiful thing and I'm thankful constantly to God for permitting me the privilege to be his representative so to speak to his people and also the intercessor for the people before God's throne because that's the main work of the priest is to pray for the people. Also to offer sacrifices to God for the people as we say which simply means to serve the services of the church in such a way that the things of this world the things of God's good creation are offered up to him and transfigured by him and returned to us as as life-giving realities. The premier example of course is the divine liturgy which in the West is called the mass. It's the service of it's the premier service of the church the central action of the people of God by which we bring ourselves first of all together into the temple of God offering ourselves to him for him to purify us and illumin us and draw us increasingly closer to him and then send us out into the world to be his witnesses his hands so to speak. We do this in an interesting way. This all happens in a very interesting way which was given to us by the Lord Jesus Christ on the night before he was given over to death. He very simply called his friends together his twelve disciples and he took a bit of bread and he said to them he gave thanks and he broke it and said to them this is my body which is broken for you do this. It says for the recollection of me and then the same thing with the cup of wine he took the cup and blessed gave thanks and gave it to them saying this is the cup of my blood which is shed the new covenant my blood which is shed for you and for many for the remission of sins to this for the remembrance of me with this command he inaugurated the service of the holy liturgy in which we do the same thing imitating and we take bread a little bread ordinary bread that we've made for this purpose a cup some wine in it and we we bless it we pray over it we ask our Lord the Holy Spirit to sanctify it and to change it into our Lord's body and blood according to his promise which becomes our spiritual food and drink. We receive in in a physical way the deathless body and blood of Jesus Christ who has himself destroyed death by his death and risen and can never die again we receive that deathlessness into ourselves in this way every time we receive only communion it's a very powerful thing it is as tangible and tasteable as as anything could be this communion we have with our God who has for us provided himself to us in this way physically not just spiritually in some kind of ethereal way but very very tangibly and tasteably in holy communion so that we become one with him physically and also of course in every other way but so this is this is the work of the priest is to sanctify these the people through these means that God has made available to us through prayer through sacrifice through the holy mysteries or sacraments as we say only baptism only communion the other sacraments all of which use some kind of tangible created physical reality as the means by which God communicates himself to us it's very beautiful and and powerful and you see that God's energies are imparted to people and their lives change as a result so it's it's a great privilege for a priest to have a front row seat to all of these things you can say and despite our own unworthiness and inadequacy all these things happen according to God's word and promise through his energy not our own so it's it's a beautiful thing to be a part of and i'm very thankful for it was there anything else in your question that i neglected to hit on no touch on nope excellent good good and how about as we progress into this exponential technology age there's eight billion humans on the planet the geopolitics like you were describing people are able to fly to different places and move and live next to people that they would have potentially never had the chance to live next to before the power of the technologies being democratized and put in our hands that at unprecedented rates so how do you see the what would be maybe like a main principle that we could embody both as children and as adults that could help us really get through the complexity of the next couple decades first of all i i don't want to assume that this represents progress from one level of being to a another level of being a higher or better level of being it may very well represent some kind of regression for human beings that the exponential technology era could yes that's a very interesting point we need to bear in mind that possibility because to my way of thinking it's equally possible or maybe even more possible that it is in fact a regression than any kind of progression the fact that we have yet to fully unleash and unlock the potential of our own biological communion with the divine and yet we're already going into the technological appendages of the genetic engineering and the neural implants and yes yes and then we we run a real risk of being enslaved by these things that we have created by the works of our own hands it's a matter of idolatry again in many cases i believe i know for example quite a few young men who are addicted to video games and i don't use that word lightly they cannot break away from them yes and it's not like these are some kind of a profound means of communion with their own souls or with god no they're they're they're meaningless really they're insipid and yet these young it's almost always young men cannot break away from them this is a real problem and just like one example i'm many many i mean look how we are with our cell phones look how we are yeah i mean we make jokes about and draw cartoons about it but really it's very serious we are conducting an experiment on the whole human race that's unprecedented and we have no idea the consequences of it so that's one thing i would want to say in a kind of a prophetic mode i would not assume that this is progress necessarily another thing i would like to say though perhaps more gently and optimistically is that human beings remain human beings we are the good creation of god we are created according to the image of god and his likeness and in his likeness we are made to resemble god and we know what god is like in jesus christ we're made to be like that so if these very powerful tools that we create are able in some ways to help us toward that then thank god let us use them i think that should be our criterion however not to make some new technology just because we can i think there are things that we can do that we ought not to do because they may very well end up being dehumanizing they may enslave us so i don't know much about these things but that's what i think since you asked the principle of making technology that assists us with the communion with the divine does the spirit come from god and meets the body for this experience of life how does that process work does does our life and consciousness just emerge from biological evolution do we have a spirit or soul that sets into the body yes certainly we do human beings are unique in all of creation i i would maintain as an orthodox christian and as a priest we are not like the other animals even though we are you know we're very much like the other animals we can be described for example as the greatest of the great apes no that's not an inaccurate description of a human being but it is an in a woefully inadequate description of a human being because it doesn't it doesn't speak at all to the aspect of humanity which is foremost which is that we are created in the image of our creator no other animal is and so while we are animals obviously i mean it's obvious to anyone who who studies things honestly we are like the other animals we're made of the same stuff we have the same physical processes otherwise they couldn't test new pharmaceuticals on other species of animals and to find out if they'll work in us so i mean it's it's obvious that we have biologically much in common with the other animals however we are not mere animals we're not merely physical beings and i would say the other animals are not either but that's another discussion but we are unique among the other animals in that we correspond to god in our in our very being we correspond to god in our very being we are made to live to be like him to become more and more like him and to live in communion with him eternally and we cannot say that with any certainty about any other animal so yes we are unique how that uniqueness came about is to me a bit of a mystery it is described in the book of genesis using different different images or different pictures of different stories for example in one place it says that god formed adam i mean ha adamah from the earth adam in ha adamah so that it emphasizes how adam the man corresponds to ha adamah which means the soil the earth in the hebrew it's very clear that correspondence it shows that we are made of the same stuff and experience the same physical processes as all the rest of creation but god creates us with his hands with the other things he speaks and it is with us he creates us he forms us out of the ground i think that's really significant in the solar the spirit the soul and the spirit that's described as coming into the first created man by god breathing into his nostrils the breath of life the soul is the spirit of god that's the enlivening energy of god that that enters into us when we take our first breath our first breath and for every succeeding breath that that breath of god you know that that created and sustaining energy of god which is itself uncreated which is another it's such a it's such an interesting fact that you're saying this because all so many of the other especially like buddhism is so adamant about one's ability to train their focus on the breath breathing and that is god every breath is god it's a divine gift and yes every breath is a divine gift and what would you say is the most beautiful thing in the world the most beautiful thing in the world undoubtedly it is in my view our lord jesus christ the god man and his holy bride the church that is the most beautiful thing in the world that i know of yes oh this has been such a good conversation father so thank you it's been such a pleasure thank you thank you so much for coming on the show i'd love to um as before we close i'd love to have you run take us through a prayer sure um i think a good prayer for us to offer at this point is a very simple prayer that orthodox christians say several times a day when we pause to pray uh it's a prayer that is addressed to our lord the holy spirit whom we have spoken of today uh usually our prayers are addressed to god the father or god the son it really doesn't matter to whom we address them because they are all one as we've said but this prayer is addressed to our lord the holy spirit and it goes like this oh heavenly king comforter the spirit of truth who are in all places filling all things treasury of good things and giver of life come and abide in us and cleanse us from every stain and save our souls or good one in the name of the father and of the son and of the holy spirit one god amen thank you so much father saw this has been a big honor and pleasure for me to be able to bring you on the show and have you share who you are and the teachings of orthodox christianity and so many of the other aspects of your worldview thank you it's been a great honor and pleasure for me too my friend thank you for inviting me thank you it was good to share this time with you thank you thank you and thank you everyone for tuning in we really appreciate it we'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments below on the episode let us know what you're thinking we would also love for you to have more conversations with your friends your families co-workers people online on social media about orthodox christianity and about the holy trinity about all of the things that we talked about today on the show what the future of all this is going to be like and also support the artists the entrepreneurs the organizations the spiritual leaders around the world that you believe in support them and help them grow you can find all of the links below as well again to the transfiguration greek orthodox church you can find simulations links below our patreon or paypal or cryptocurrency link you can design cool merch and get paid all those links are below support the ones in your communities as well everyone and go and build the future everyone commune with the divine and manifest your dreams into the world we love you very much thank you for tuning in and we will see you soon


Hello everyone, this is Dan. I'd like to provide an update on PayPal and Square. I'm still very bullish on these two companies. Let me explain why. Here's a recap of the price targets from the video that I posted on March 18. I'm still sticking with the same targets. In other words, I expect PayPal to reach $300 a share and Square to reach $280 a share before the end of July 2021. Compared to the price from March 18, PayPal at a time was $244.48. As of yesterday, closing, it already went up to $255.6 and Square on March 18, it was $236.21. As of yesterday, April 7, 2021, it was at $245.12. They're both training in the right direction, according to my forecast. Here's a recent development that's very positive for Square. As of March 1, 2021, Square started their banking business. They recently acquired a license to operate as an industrial bank. And with that, they will offer business loans and deposit products to the customers. I expect the bottom line of Square to improve because of the new banking operation. You might already know that Square also offer their customers the ability to trade stock using their Square app, as well as trade cryptocurrencies. They have a very aggressive business model. They are quickly expanding into different areas. This is a chart that I show from the March 18 video. That surprised us of the market close of March 17, 2021. And I mentioned that during the past year, Square went up by 246% and PayPal went up by 156%. Both of them are very impressive companies. This is the chart I printed at market close yesterday, comparing the movement of Square, which is the candlestick chart here, and the movement of PayPal, which is the blue line chart here. Two of them are almost side by side with each other. And then I plotted the triple ETF that's paid to the NASDAQ 100, which is ETF TQQQ. As you can see, both Square and PayPal are pretty much in sync with TQQQ. The good news is that because of sector rotation, the market is now favoring tech stocks such as TQQQ or CQQ or NASDAQ 100. Let's look at sector rotation. This is a summary of the different sectors for the last month. The tech sector was ranked number four. This is in the most recent week, and the tech sector has risen up to number two in ranking. That means tech sector is rotating back. In other words, stocks such as QQQ, TQQQ, PayPal, and Square will be moving up in the next few days. At this point, I'd like to remind you to please click the like, subscribe, and notification button if you like what you've seen so far so that you will be notified when I post the next video. This is also for the sake of the YouTube algorithm. Thank you. Let's continue. You might know that the very famous ARC investment group has been buying a lot of PayPal stocks and Square stocks. But recently, especially in the last month, they have been selling the PayPal shares. And meanwhile, they have been increasing the holding of the Square stock. I don't think this is a bad situation for PayPal, although it's definitely a very positive sign for Square. The reason why is because the head of the ARC investment group, Cathy Wood, she mentioned in a recent interview that she liked to trade certain cash-like instruments such as Apple during volatile time because those stocks tend to not drop too much during a dip when the market has dipped already, she would tend to sell stocks from companies such as Apple and pick up what she called a high-conviction stock, which tend to have very high volatility. And once the market has reached bottom, these very bullish stock that has reached bottom will bounce back a lot quicker because of their volatility or high beta. And not surprisingly, if you look at the beta for PayPal, it's only 1.15, which is about the same as the broad market. Whereas for Square, the beta is 2.43. Since the tech sector pretty much reached a short-term bottom about a week ago, it's bouncing back now. And that's why Square will be rising a lot faster than PayPal. And it is therefore logical for Cathy Wood to be selling PayPal and buying Square at this time. Just to confirm, PayPal is not doomed yet. You can see that with the ARK Investment ARKF Financial ETF, Square certainly is ranked number one. That's an indication that they really value Square. But in the meanwhile, PayPal is still number four on the list. On the other hand, with the ARKK fund, Square is number two on the list. Of course, Tesla is number one. And PayPal is not even here on the top 10. It's probably number 20 or so.  They are just doing that because of their typical financial manipulation during this time of the market cycle. I'm still very bullish on both PayPal and Square. Let's look at the chart. This is the daily chart for PayPal. We can see that it's been following this triangular pattern. And fortunately, there's a breakout from the pattern upward in the last five days. In the meanwhile, we see a buy signal from MACD, a buy signal from DMI. Those are very bullish signs. Let's look at the hourly chart. As of yesterday, PayPal closed at $256.3. We can see this nice upward trending channel that PayPal has been following in the last four days. In the meanwhile, we do see a warning sign from the RSI indicator showing that the stock might be getting overboard. That's why we got to be careful at this point. And we see a bullish buy signal from DMI. At this point, PayPal will be fighting against its resistance of $257. Apparently, it was supported at $226 about two weeks ago. That's when this positive trend line started. As of this morning, which is April 8, 2021, and it's around 9.28 am, PayPal is at $260. So it already broke through this resistance line of $257, which is a very bullish sign. As far as the other resistance levels and support levels, I see resistance at $257, which is this line here, and it's already being penetrated, which is great. And then the next one up would be $260, which also happens to be the upper bowling juban. And that's what the price is at at this point at 9.30 am, April 8. And then the next level up will be $277, and the next level up will be $279. As far as support levels, I see support at $245, which is a very important support because it's the 20-day simple moving average. And then the next support down will be $231, which is the daily lower bowling juban. And then the next level will be $226, back to this line. Hopefully, we don't get back to that line anytime soon. Now, I have to provide a word of caution, which is that the standard and pool index is at its all-time high in the last few days. In other words, it could be a short-term pool back with the S&P index. And once that happens, it might pull down the other stocks, including PayPal and Square as well. That's why I'm cautiously optimistic at this point about PayPal and Square. Let's look at the daily chart for Square. We see this triangular pattern as of the last two days. The price has broken up above this triangular pattern, which is a bullish sign. In the meanwhile, we see this buy signal from DMI and a buy signal from MACD. Let's look at the hourly chart for Square. Instantly, yesterday as of 11am, I sold some of my shares at $247.2, because I saw the price way exceeded the upper bowling juban on the hourly chart, and I expected the short-term pool back and certainly it happened. In the meanwhile, we see this nice upward-training channel, and we have this positive buy signal from DMI and the positive buy signal from MACD. We do see a warning sign from RSI, showing that the stock might be a little bit overboard, and that's also one of the reasons why I sold some of my shares yesterday to lock in my profit. The next support level Square will be fighting will be $253. At this time, which is around 9.31am, April 8th, 2021, is trading at $251.5, and that means it's still fighting this resistance level. Five days six days ago, Square got a very nice support from this level at $201. As far as the other support and resistance levels, definitely the first one up for resistance will be $253, and the next one up will be $256, which happens to be the daily upper bowling juban, and then the next level up will be $267. For support, the next level down will be $235, which is the 50-day simple moving average, and then the next level down will be $230, which is a 20-day simple moving average, and then the next level down will be $227, $208, and then we back down to $201, and hopefully we don't get back to $201 anytime soon. Again, I need to caution everybody that S&P is at its all-time high, and there could be a short-term pullback in the market pretty soon, taking down maybe also Square as well as PayPal. Let's compare the analyst's opinions today as opposed to the opinions back in March. I highlighted the changes in yellow. Pretty much there hasn't been a lot of change, except Yahoo Business increased the target for PayPal from 306.6 to 308.19, and then TheStreet.com reduced the rating for PayPal a little bit from A- to B+. And then they lowered the target from 333.15 to 318.73. It's not much of a change there. As far as Square, TipRanks.com lowered the rating a little bit from strong buy to moderate buy, and however the high end of the target got increased from 375 to 380. The average target went down from 307 to 275, and the low target went down from 241 to 160. That's a little bit alarming. As far as my own evaluation, this is a quick recap of what I show in the March 18th video. Based on my calculation, I arrived at a target price of $280 a share with a forward P ratio of 60 and estimated annual earnings growth of 22.2%. I'm still sticking with this target. As far as Square, my target is $280 a share based on an assumption of 250 average forward P ratio and the projected earnings growth of 54.22% per year. The 250 P ratio is very aggressive. I explained in the March 18th video that I believe it is justified compared to some of the other companies with high P ratios and also in light of the fact that Square is very aggressively expanding into other profitable areas such as banking, stock trading, cryptocurrency trading, etc. Just to recap, my target for PayPal is $300 a share and for Square is $280 a share to be reached by the end of July 2021. Thank you for watching all the way to here. If you are watching this video a few days after April 8th, 2021, please make sure to check the update section below this video in case I've entered update notes. And if you like what you've seen so far, please click the like, subscribe and notification button so you'll be notified when I post the next video. It is also for the sake of the YouTube algorithm. Thank you very much. As usual, I will welcome your comments, questions and suggestions. I like to caution you that I'm not a financial advisor. You should make your own decision with regard to buying and selling stocks and you should probably consult with the financial advisors before you do so. I share my trading strategies for educational purpose only. This about wraps up my video for now. I will chat with you again in the next few days. In the meanwhile, I'd like to wish you the very best of luck with your financial investments.


So a couple of years ago on the program, we reacted to a video about British people who were told the cost and prices of prescription drugs and medical procedures in the United States and their reactions. It was just it was really entertaining to see because they were genuinely shocked that the American health care system is so terrible and that we tolerate this most of all, right? Because in in the UK you have a national health system I mean, it really is ideal. That's exactly what I want. Having said that though there's a new video by the New York Times where they show more non-Americans details and statistics about our health care system here in America and their reactions are just priceless. Enjoy. If health care is a constitutional right, then that's a form of communism because no country could afford those payments without seizing the assets of everybody else. Welcome to Finland! Oh! Dudes, what's going on? It's making me so mad! I mean, come on guys, it's it's not that hard. Look around the world. Everyone else seems to have figured it out, right? Imagine you're in America. Which of these options would be best for you? Hmm, that's a Yeah, that's that's a lot to think about. What is it? An Oop Max? I guess with what I got here, I would go with Plan D because the deductible is zero. Okay, there's there's more. Gold, HMO, PPO, PPO, HMO. What are co-pays? I don't...  It's too complicated. I've lost, I'm so lost. In Canada, I don't have to really think about the different plans that I could pick from. You just pay one amount per month and all the major treatments are covered. At least 70% of our medical expenses are always covered. Uninsured, unable to afford treatment for a tooth infection. It keeps flaring up. Cook Emma Rittner lost her job in March. I did manage to get antibiotics from a friend whose mom regularly goes down to Mexico and I've been taking that self-medicating based off of doctor... Dr. Google's advice. Here in Japan, even if you lose a job, you would never lose your health insurance. When you lose your job, that's when society should help you. I've chosen a creative job and had the backing of a healthcare system, but if you don't have that, do you pick the safe job or do you pick the creative job? The average price per unit for insulin in 2018. Germany, $11. Canada's $12. Wow. It's like eight times the price of insulin in Canada. I guess that explains why Americans come up to Canada to buy medication. Sorry, I'm sorry, hold on. So the FDA doesn't have any authority over the prices? We have also privatized health insurance companies in Germany, but the prices are regulated by the government. The government negotiates the prices and fixes that price for two years. In Singapore, they regulate the stuff to keep the prices down and, you know, avoid sh** like this happening. Right, so I'm looking at an American medical bill. Why is it so expensive? $428,000 for rooms and such empty spaces. What? It's cheaper to go to a hotel than this one. Skin to skin after a C-section is $39. I had to pay $39.35 to hold my baby after he was born. You need to pay money to hold a baby? My brother Jamie, who's in a lot of our videos, was pretty badly injured. He's going to lose a couple fingers. If you can give $1 or if you can give $5, every little bit will help him and his family. That's heartbreaking. GoFundMe should not be something that people have to resort to to pay for their medical bills. So in America, people spend more than twice as much as in Japan for healthcare. You know, if I paid twice the amount for a car, I would want the car to be twice as good. So what's the life expectancy in the US? Why is it less? The US should be on top of both of those lists. Like, if you're charging your citizens that much money, then they better be living the longest lives. It doesn't make sense. When Alec turned 26, he was no longer allowed on his mother's insurance plan. Instead, he decided to pay for his insulin over the counter at list price. But the pharmacist told him a month's supply would be $1,300. He left empty-handed. Alec's official cause of death was diabetic ketoacidosis. A couple of years ago, I developed a heart condition and I had to have my heart restarted three times. After the third time I had it restarted, the doctor suggested I get heart surgery. When I was 13, I started to get sick and really, really sick. I was then very quickly admitted into hospital where after three weeks, I had treatment for a brain virus. The cost of the operation, I think, is about $60,000. And then the next day, when I left the hospital and I got my bill, it was a bill for parking. It was about $30. I was treated by royal doctors, had several MRIs, number punctures, all for free. So I was pretty happy that I lived in Canada and had universal health care. I couldn't have survived if I was in America. To know that I can get sick, I can get injured, but I will still be taken care of. That is freedom. This is not freedom. I really loved the reaction to Bill O'Reilly saying that if health care was a constitutional right, that would be tantamount to communism. Because you could just see how shocked they are with that level of stupidity, but it's honestly worse than that because I don't know about you folks, but I know people who thought that the Affordable Care Act was communism. Literally, conservatives have made this argument. The ACA is communism. Let me remind you, the ACA is a plan that hinges entirely on private insurance. And the role of the government is to basically just pump millions and millions and millions of dollars into the system to subsidize the cost of existing plans. But I mean, long term, as we've all seen in practice, it doesn't work out. The Affordable Care Act failed because what's affordable is subjective. But really, there shouldn't be a cost associated with health care when it comes to the point of service, right? Because so long as there's a cost, it's going to be prohibitive. And what we should care about is people getting health care. It shouldn't be commodified. We shouldn't worry about whether or not somebody has the money to pay. We should just worry that they receive that care. It's a basic service that government should provide. I mean, we expect the government to provide us with roads. We expect the government to pay for a fire department to come out to our houses if we need them. There's a lot of things that the government does. But for some reason in the United States, health care isn't one of the expectations that we have for government. We've just culturally accepted this. And thankfully, the tide is turning here, but not fast enough. So, yeah. So I like how when they were looking at the plans, one of the guys said, what are co-pays?  Exactly. And that seems like an oversimplification, but that's exactly it. Why am I paying every single month a gigantic premium? I think between me and my husband, it's like $14, $1500. I don't even know how much our deductible is. It's super high. But if we're already paying money every single month, and furthermore, a lot of us don't even use the health care, especially for young, why do we have to pay for co-pays?  And I went to a doctor and I didn't have a copay.  Come to find out, I get a bill a couple of weeks later in the mail. So the copay actually would have been preferable than the hundreds of dollars. Our system is a joke. It's an absolute joke, but yet conservatives in both parties in the United States prop it up as like being one of the best in the world. But this video debunks that as well. I love how shocked they were. One person said, you need to pay money to hold a baby. That was the cost of $39 for skin-to-skin contact. Yeah, they nickel and dime you in every way they conceivably can. And anyone who's ever received health care in the United States can attest to this. Every single American has a story about how shitty the American health care system is. And when they showed the price of drugs, you know, the United States in comparison with other developed countries, it's shocking how much more we pay. I mean, I have a nephew who needs insulin. He needs this to survive. And just the worry that he can't afford it and that my sister can't provide the insulin that he needs, that in and of itself is so immoral. A society that allows something like this to go on. Somebody in America in the richest country on earth having to worry that they won't be able to, you know, afford their life-saving insulin, it shouldn't happen. It shouldn't happen. But the fact that it does, it really speaks to where our priorities lie as a nation. They brought up the GoFundMe's. Every single person knows firsthand that there's someone in their lives that needed a GoFundMe. If I'm paying twice as much for a car, it better be twice as good. And that comments that out to me because that's such a great point. It's simple, but it really is punchy. It's concise. It's exactly what I think Americans need to hear. We pay so much more than other countries, but our outcomes are worse. Our life expectancy is lower. Honestly, to me, I find it so hard to believe that every single American isn't just furious all the time thinking about our health care system. I mean, I talked last year on the program about how months and months and months after my dad passed away, my mom was still receiving medical bills from my dad. It's bad enough that she was grieving during a pandemic, couldn't be with her loved ones because, you know, COVID-19. But on top of that, on top of all the bad things, she still received these bills from my dad, who died a long time ago now, for thousands of dollars, tens of thousands of dollars. It's so disgusting. So then you add on top of the grief, this fear, oh my God, am I going to go bankrupt? Am I going to afford this? Do I actually have to pay for this? Is this just a statement from the insurance company? Are they going to cover it because nothing is clear in our health care system? You just don't know, right? Sometimes you get bills and you don't actually have to pay them. It's just like an atomized receipt. Sometimes you do. So, you know, you get confused. You get fearful of what's going to happen. Is your livelihood going to be affected if you can't pay tens of thousands of dollars? Because, of course, the normal human being in this country can't. It's just, it's awful. Now, the Canadian at the end, he said, he had a procedure. It cost $60,000 and all he paid was $30 for parking. I can't even imagine what that would be like. I honestly can't fathom it. I cannot fathom it. And look, all of this, in some, I think this is pretty obvious, but I think it's obvious why the health insurance industry, along with their shills in Congress and on mainstream media, are fighting so hard against Medicare for All. Because if we actually got Medicare for All codified into law, if they try to take this away from us, like, let's say, hypothetically speaking, we elected a progressive as president, and it actually passed. By some miracle, it passed. And then the next Republican administration threatened to repeal it or chip away at it, there would be riots in the streets. You can't take something like that away from people, which is why even in the UK and in Canada, the Conservative Party in Canada, the Tories in the UK, they can't just outright run on getting rid of their public health systems. They can't do that because it'd be too unpopular. You can't take that away from someone once you give that to them. So what they do is they try to covertly undermine the system by partially privatizing it and chipping away at it slowly but surely over the course of decades. And, you know, that's still bad, that's still terrible, but they still have to pay fealty to the fact that they support the national health system in the UK. Conservatives in Canada still have to say, yeah, I support our system, our single-payer system. Of course, I don't want an American system, and some of them do because they're sellouts, they're corrupt, but you're never going to hear them say that because they know how unpopular it would be. And to give you an example of another policy like that is Social Security. How many times have we seen members of both parties try to either fully privatize it or partially privatize it and immediately they face swift and severe backlash like that? It's because if you put something into the hands of the American people and they love it, you cannot take that away.  So that's why they're fighting so hard against Medicare for All and even if it's really demoralizing, even if it's really frustrating to know that people are dying every single year that we don't have Medicare for All, I do understand in the back of my mind, I'm trying to remind myself that this is evidence that we're winning and we're scaring them. If they were just ignoring us, if they weren't dispatching hundreds of lobbyists to convince politicians to not support single-payer, then that'd show how ineffectual we were, how we lacked the persuasiveness needed to actually sell it, but we've sold it. The majority of Americans now support Medicare for All and depending on the poll, Republicans support it too. So I mean, we are winning in terms of convincing Americans. Now it's just a matter of actually getting it codified into law. And once we do that, it'll immediately transition into a fight to preserve what we've managed to accomplish because like, you know, the UK and Canada, you know, there's going to be private forces that try to chip away at it, but we fight. It's a never-ending battle and it's tiring, but I do believe that there is going to come a time, hopefully, when we do get Medicare for All and regardless of how long it takes, the conclusion is that it'll still be way too late, but it's better late than never. It's absolutely needed and it's the only solution to our absolutely atrocious for-profit privately run healthcare system, which is just not only a clusterfuck, but it is literally deadly.


In this presentation, we will enter data for the earnings records for August. Now in the last presentation, we did the payroll register, which gives us the information by employee per pay period. But we also need to track this information to sum up how much someone has earned during their time here. In other words, this will give us the information by employee on the payroll register for a particular pay period, which we need on the pay stub when we give someone a paycheck. We need to tell them, hey, this is how much you earned. This is how much we took out of it. There's your net pay. But we also need to know the year-to-date totals, which of course will be the same after the first pay period, but we'll differ later. In order to do that, we can't get that information from the payroll register. We have to use an earnings report. Basically the same information is just going to be formatted a bit differently. We put that over here. We scroll into the right. So this is going to be the earnings records. Now the earnings records often time.