Trump warns of bloodbath in U.S. if he loses. Former U.S. President Donald Trump has warned of a bloodbath for the American automobile industry and the country as a whole if he doesn't win a second term in the U.S. election on November 5. Trump made the remark during a rally in Vandalya, Ohio, while speaking about his plans to protect U.S. car makers from Chinese competition. The former president addressed China's leader Xi Jinping from the stage saying that you and I are friends but those big months the car manufacturing plants that you're building in Mexico right now, you're going to not hire Americans and you're going to sell the cars to us. No. We're going to put a 100% tariff on every single car that comes across the line and you're not going to be able to sell those cars if I get elected. The presumptive Republican nominee in the election added. Trump urged Americans to vote for him in the fall saying now if I don't get elected it's going to be a bloodbath for the whole. That's gonna be the least of it. It's going to be a bloodbath for the country. That'll be the least of it. Later in his address he also cautioned the crowd that if this election isn't won I'm not sure that you'll ever have another election in this country. Trump's speech that evening was mostly improvised as he complained about not being able to use the teleprompter due to strong winds.  This sucker is moving like reading a moving flag in a 35 mile per hour wind. The 77 year old said the team of US president Joe Biden interpreted Trump's mentioning of a bloodbath as a threat of political violence from their rival. He wants another January 6th but the American people are going to give him another electoral defeat this November because they continue to reject his extremism, his affection for violence and his thirst for revenge. Biden's campaign spokesman James Singer said in a statement. Trump campaign spokeswoman Caroline Levitt responded to the accusations telling CNN that crooked Joe Biden and his campaign are engaging in deceptively out of context editing. On March 12th, Legion of Free Russia, which entered the territory of Russia's Corsican-Belgarat regions together with the Russian Volunteer Corps and the Siberian Battalion announced the losses suffered by the Russian army during this period. As a result of the battles 613 servicemen of the invading Russian army were killed, 828 were wounded and 27 servicemen were captured, destroyed seven tanks of the Russian army, 20 infantry fighting vehicles, four armored personnel carriers, six howitzers, four mortars, four self-propelled artillery units, two drones, one grad installation, one grenade launcher, one morum observation complex, one radio electronic warfare vehicle, two armored vehicles was done. Also, two tanks, one armored infantry fighting vehicle, one grad unit, one armored personnel carrier, two self-propelled artillery units, one flamethrower system, one radio electronic warfare vehicle, one armored car, and more than 20 other vehicles were damaged and disabled. It should be noted that the members of the Legion announced that they have complete control over one settlement in each of Belgarat and Korsk provinces.


Now let's get into a little Q and A. And somebody had a good point. D.D. Machin says, hey, Rob, all the while with so much ETF noise, and it's a lot. No wonder no one has ever mentioned the dismissal of the SPF's second trial 10 days ago. What are they trying to cover up? Not trying to cover up. No one really cares about it because they're all so concerned about the ETF. And that's the thing. I just talked to Ed Chang, who is the head of gaming development at Avalanche. It was fascinating. We just spent, it was a quick 10-minute talk, and we talked about all the things that they're actually doing and the gaming and different things that they wanna do and things that are coming up in the next year. I'll release that in a couple of days, but no one really cares about that because it's all Bitcoin ETF, which I can totally understand. So about Sam, hopefully he faces some time. I personally think he's probably gonna be in jail for a couple of years, and he's gonna get going to get out with good behavior. And then that's pretty much it. And people are gonna get screwed over left and right for the FTX. That's usually how it works. Let's see. CoQ is the next doge on Avalanche, couldn't be. Also, they are putting money from their foundation into meme coins, crazy. There you go. There you go. All right. Beardy, please like her, be the meat and cancer sandwich, very nice.  That's how it works, right? That's why if you have any negative news, you release it on Friday, so everybody forgets it on the weekend. Maybe it was unpissed, still bullish, still looks good. Oracle on Solana, I can get behind that. But again, right now it's Bitcoin's time. Bitcoin's time to shine, that's just how it is. Ram told me to sell, Ram was never wrong. Look, there's some pretty prominent people that have told me to sell, like you gotta get out. You don't understand, it's gonna dive. All right, could be. I don't know. By just thinking like three years when we're looking back or four years again, it was like, man, can you believe we got it under $50,000? It's crazy. Yeah, it's been a rocky day though, that's for sure. But I'm happy to be here, it's fun times. I get to get all these great questions. I get to interact with people who aren't tourists yet. It's nice. Mike says, best advertising for the ETFs would be if they rocketed the first day of trading. Absolutely, definitely so. Forgot if they will not approve Bitcoin. I've always said, I didn't think they were gonna approve it. I'm still not 100% sure. But it looks like they are, so that's great. Again, this is fantastic for everybody, right? Fantastic for everybody. This gives us legitimacy moving forward, so I'm happy.  So Simon, I'll be on the show anytime you want. AJDM says, what's gonna happen to internet computer protocol in Solana? Probably take a hit for a while. You can see it right now. I mean, if I was a betting person, I would say that people will be selling their alts to get into Bitcoin, but that's not the case. In the last hour, you've seen Bitcoin rise at 0.4, if they're at about one, well, that's too bad. Anything up majorly? Man, it's a pretty flat day. I think everybody's waiting. Oh, wow, hopped into this in 5% in an hour. It's like a good six months for the S&P 500. Boring. Fox, trustworthy media. All media is not trustworthy, even me. Don't even trust me. Exactly, who knows? I've been in here, and I think we've all been in this game so long. No one really knows. The only thing really you can count on is time. And the four year cycle so far. I'm still a big believer in that. I thought they already said that the spotting up was not announced and was denied. I haven't heard anything about denial. That'd be interesting. Wouldn't that be interesting if they denied it? This is Rob's fault. 4AKM, hmm, for some reason, I always get deep thanks and your videos are out and watch out for anyone else. You know what I think it is? I think they target me. I'm gonna tell you why. I did a dedicated video on it, and there's a link in the description of all my videos now where I say, don't fall for this AI scam. When you click on that link, it's like a five minute video and I explain what these AI generated scams are, why you need to avoid them, and how to shut them down. Very quick video. And I have heard that from other people for some reason that I get a lot of AI scams, even though I warn everybody about it. So who knows? But the good news is everybody knows about it. I watch the channel, so I'm pretty happy about that. But hey, I wanna, let's just take that point, let's just take that 1% chance it doesn't get approved. I want everybody to know that it doesn't really matter if it doesn't get approved or get delayed because we got till March. And if it gets approved and we get denied in March, it doesn't matter. At some point, it'll get approved anyhow. And the having's coming up. We've done pretty well without a Bitcoin ETF so far. Having happens in April or May of 2024, so. And of course we see some real fireworks coming forward. So if it doesn't get, if it gets pushed back, not a big deal. If it doesn't get approved, I could care less. Or I couldn't care, I couldn't care less. And we'll come on the other side, just fine. I'm happy. I'm happy anyway. Let's see. Rob, what do you think about Tia and SCI? Guy's gonna do a deep dive video on Tia, Celestia, so we'll see. And SCI, not really too well-versed in it. SWE looks to be a pretty good layer one solution, but I'm not really too well-versed in it. All in the final is approved. All right, great. Let's go to Twitter. Or you think it'll be approved. Or maybe it is approved already. I know when it's approved because I will be bombarded with tags. Ah, yeah, Twitter. No, not yet. It doesn't really matter. Goopless wants to scam. Ah, see. And Jared says I keep getting the fake Anatoli from the founder of Solana on James's video. Well, that does make sense. James seems to have an affinity for Solana. Who to thunk it? Guys, is Cardano a good buy now? Probably do well. Like I said before, pretty much everything you're gonna buy is gonna do well. The question is, which one's gonna do fantastic? And that's why I diversify a little bit. Yeah. Okay, so Bronco Novak says 55K is incoming less than an hour of approved. Let's hope so. I'd be great for my portfolio. Exactly. You can't trust me. What's the top five alts? Depends. Depends on like if you're talking about ones that actually work and do things or which ones can actually pop off. Cause that's a big difference. Because there are some alts that's, if they're over a hundred million as far as market cap, and if they have massive amount of total supply, even circulating, well actually circulating supply, you don't touch those. But if they're less than a hundred million and they have a pretty low circulating supply, I don't have a lot of unlocks. And they actually have momentum. Those are actually pretty good runs. And it's a very degenerate play, but that's what it is. But as far as if you think about like things that actually do stuff and work, well, Ethereum, Solana, I don't know if you guys have used Solana for the one of their dexes, seamless, super easy, very nice, cheap, I mean super cheap, and everything just works. Sushi swap, sometimes get the wrong token. Sometimes things don't go through. So there's that. Layer two solutions, Polygon and Arbitrum. So yeah, and of course with Avalanche. I also like NIR, NIR is again, it had the largest TGE for the token generation event which was Sweatcoin, which they put all that hundred million users of Sweatcoin onto the blockchain. Didn't miss a beat and NIR is pretty good. And I'm gonna have the founder on a couple of leaks or so. We're gonna talk about all the things that are going on with NIR. And that's our key TF, listening fidelity. Yep, that is correct. What's the deadline for signing wearing that T-shirt? We, I gave them until March. It doesn't get approved by March. If it does get approved before March, I wore the T-shirt. If it doesn't get approved by end of March, sign it was a T-shirt. It's not looking too good for me. I'm okay. It's a good question. Crypto Phil says, why can't we file a lawsuit against the SEC and Gensler manipulation? I'm not a lawyer, but I'm gonna pretend to be one for a second. It's really all about intent. Did they intend to manipulate the market? First of all, we'll never know. Because it's not like a government agency is going to give up any of their documents to anybody investigating them without a serious long fight. And for the fact that SEC is just full of lawyers. I believe Gary's a lawyer himself. So as far as manipulation, is it gross negligence? Yes, I would say that it is, but is that punishable by law? Well, it depends. So again, was there intent of what they did? It doesn't look like it was. I know some people would say, well, they got their account back. The account was hacked at 310. They got it back by 328. That's like roughly 18 minutes. That never happens. And I just want to tell everybody this, for everybody that says that like, well, I got my account hacked and I didn't get it back for five weeks, I hate to break it to you. You're not a three-letter agency in the US government. If you're the SEC, you probably get to the front of the line a lot faster than Joe Blow and Jane Blow. And that's just really how it works. Sorry, that's just the truth. And actually there was a report from, if you go to x.com forward slash safety, they said they already did an internal investigation. It looks like it actually was compromised.  They're saying that the little investigation they did looks like it was actually hacked. So that's it. Asked on Visa, what's the last time you saw your pool? That's a green screen. See, it's just listed not yet approved. Mind-wise, it's true. It's just listed not yet approved until listings have a price. All the news will blast it. Very true. Very, very true. I love Solana. Dan Krupper says confirmed to be trading tomorrow. That's what I keep hearing. But hey, we'll see. 52 week high on ETH. That's good. It hasn't only been that great. ETH been kind of a, oh, Jerry's here. Just heard from my brother Gary, he said spot ETF will be approved barring any hacks to any of his accounts. Yep, it's true. Can you educate George from crypto as he called WMT the poor man's helium? He could use some extra info, countries, nodes as he scanned. You know, like helium's made a pretty good, they made a pretty good run, let's be honest. They actually, they're here in the US. They have a working product. That's like a $20 for unlimited internet access and phone service or telecommunications. And you can do it right now. World mobile token took a different direction. And yes, they did launch in third world country. I always say Tanzania, but that's because I'm from America. I can't pronounce things. Tanzania and different parts of Sub-Saharan Africa. And they're actually going to branch out and they're already here in the United States. I actually talked to Mickey Watkins a week ago. And I know some pretty good insight information that I can't tell any of you because I don't like to give that out because I'm not Nancy Pelosi. So when Mickey comes on, I'll have him explain it. But yeah, World Mobile is going to do just fine. And so we'll heal him. Again, it doesn't matter what you invest in crypto. You're going to do a heck of a lot better, not in everything. Jerry says, Jupiter's an amazing aggregate. Yes it is. Is it worth stacking Kornikobi? Yeah, excellent game. Looks great, built on Cardano. Rob and the crew doing a fantastic job over there. I think it's a, first I have to buy a PC and then I can play it. UFO nut says it's a done deal, Bitcoin TF. Yeah, it could be. Don't forget about Doge. Yeah. Have you heard of Decimated? No. Do you know when Meld will have more staking pools? Sorry, I think they're all filled. We did a staking pool here at DNews for Meld. If you haven't heard of Meld, it started off on Cardano, then they went multi-chain. Now they're working with Avalanche and a couple others. And it is like a DeFi bank. And we've worked with Ken Oling, who is the founder and we have a staking pool going on right now. There's no, Ken did say they're trying to roll out more pools, but they're trying to keep up with capacity. There's so much demand right now, it's very tough. So if you ever just want to find out what Meld is, just do digital asset news, Meld. And that video will pop up. Or you can go to danteachescrypto.com, 100% free website.  Just tell you when the new videos are in. And you can go to the website, everything's right there for you. Let's see, what did I miss? Let me go down here. Free website, that's true. That's a good question. Progressive Martian says, have you finished the Farcana airdrop missions? How do you refer friends? The thing was, we did a video on, it's a web through game called Farcana. And I think it's gonna do great. It's actually has a working product right now. And for tournaments and leagues and events, you're actually going to be able to, it's not a play to earn, because that's not a great model. We can see that with Axie. But it's a win to earn model. And what do you win? Bitcoin. So it's working out pretty well. It's over on, it's being, the other game studio is in UAB. They have over 260 devs and employees actually working on it. And then they've integrated with that eSports team G2 with Ocelot. Anyhow, I did a video on it. And to get to the points, the airdrop missions for the token, I'm an American citizen. So I couldn't sign up with Bybit. So all I was able to do was actually just sign in on my name and get my email, play the game and that's it. When I got to the Bybit integration, I couldn't do it. So they should still be up. And that's as far as I got first level. Yeah, Mr. Bren. So I don't wanna post a link anyway. You can look at the SEC site if something's approved or not. Exactly true. Sweating to the coins. Yeah. Quant. Steve says, can they still approve today or the two late? You would think that the government only works in bankers hours, but apparently it's going to be approved somewhere around five, six or seven PM Eastern Standard Time. That's like four hours from now. So we'll see. All right, everybody. I think, let's see. scc.gov. There's a link for everybody to check it out. Let's see. I don't see anything right now. In the SEC website, filings, search and access. Here it is. You can take a look here. Sorry, I should have showed you though. Search for latest filings. Let's see. Here. I'll put this link. Everybody can take a look if they want to. This is all the latest filings and it's sorted by date and time. So January 10th, 1436. Military time, 2.36 now. So bank of Montreal, first trust. JP Morgan Chase. Now they don't do anything. Food solutions. I don't see anything here. So that's it. All right, buddy. Well, that's it for today. If it gets approved, fantastic. If not, fantastic. We all have till March, but it's looking pretty good so far. Anyhow, thanks everybody for stopping by. I appreciate it. Like today's video, thumbs up, subscribe, all that great stuff. I'll see you tomorrow for NFA Live with Ben into the Cryptiverse and Guy from Coin Bureau. We'll do it and we'll talk about whatever happened today and some other stuff. So thanks so much, everybody. I appreciate you. And I'll see you on the next one. Have a good day.


lot for the Yankees to feel good about lot for the Orioles to not feel good about it and that also includes looking ahead to next week when they come to the Bronx for four more right absolute domination by the Yankees again they hit five more home runs it's a third straight game in which they've hit at least five home runs Higashioka hit two or Shella hit two may been chips in with one Paxton pitched into the seventh inning of this game continued to work that curveball in that's a very good sign but Bob when the Yankees match up with the Orioles this really resembles a high school baseball team playing against a little league team and I know that sounds harsh because they're both major league teams but the Yankees just go out there and pound and pummel the Orioles that's what they've done to them all season 13 and 2 against the Orioles this season that includes 12 wins in a row they don't want to leave Camden yards where every inning or every other inning they're putting baseballs into the seats you know we should start a new game the way everybody's contributing just put the starters on a wheel spin it and then just try and pick like who's gonna be the hitting star of that game two more home runs for Geo Rochella tonight five overall for the Yankees and their 14 to 2 win and home runs by ballpark this season the Yankees hit 43 in 10 games at Camden yards take a look at the Tigers at home only 37 Giants just 39 and the Marlins 44 so we've added the Marlins to let that list because the Yankees had five more at Camden yards tonight this is stunning the Yankees have 17 individual players with home runs against the Orioles this year 52 homers total the rest of Major League Baseball there are 14 teams with fewer than 17 players who have hit a home run Yankees at Camden yards have 43 home runs this season that is a major league record by a visiting team in any ballpark a 15 game winning streak there tied for the second longest road winning streak in American League history against any opponent and 10 individual multi Homer games that is a major league record at any road ballpark so racking up the winds they leave Camden yards happily exhausted from swinging the bats and knowing that they had a pretty pro Yankee crowd there too which may have helped yeah a lot of folks traveling south and that's been going on for a long time back when I was a newspaper writer you could always hear the Yankee fans at Camden yards and the Yankees put on a tremendous show these are two teams that are moving in absolutely opposite directions the Yankees have big plans to do something in October the Yankees are on pace to win 105 106 games the Orioles are on pace to lose about that amount the Orioles are in the midst of this rebuild but you look at the team that they put out there on any given night Bob and you say to yourself wow this is going to be quite a rebuild this is going to take a lot of time they have a couple of decent players but the Yankees just go out there and absolutely dominate them and for all those who are talking about well the Yankees are beating up on one of the worst teams in baseball yes that's what you're supposed to do if you're one of the better teams in baseball you have to beat the teams that you're supposed to beat and that's what the Yankees are doing against the team in their division you pile up those wins and the Yankees have been dominant in their division


We're back with a breakfast and plus TV Africa and of course we're set for a first major conversation right here looking at the situation as far as the Inamdi Council case is concerned. And our guest is already standing by to readjust this to that topic well. The federal government is saying it will, of Nigeria that is, is saying it will consider appropriate legal options concerning the judgment of the Court of Appeal on the trial of the leader of the prescribed Indigenous people of Biafra, IPOB, Inamdi Kanu, the Attorney General of the Federation Naboka Malami. He made this known in a statement issued by Dr. Omar Gwando, who is his special assistant on media and public relations at the Ministry of Justice. Malami said court for the avoidance of doubt and by the verdict of the court Kanu was only discharged and not acquitted. And of course, now consequently the appropriate legal options before the authorities, the federal government is saying, will be exploited and communicated accordingly. If you remember, the Court on Thursday in Abuja, a quash, the terrorism charges brought against Inamdi Kanu, the leader of the Indigenous, the prescribed Indigenous people of Biafra Group, delivering judgment in an appeal filed by Kanu, a three-member panel led by Justice Hana Tussanke in a unanimous judgment held at the respondent by not responding to the appellate submissions conceded to the allegation that Kanu was forcefully renditioned from Nigeria to Kenya, to Nigeria rather from Kenya. Now joining us to discuss his involvement with analysis is, I guess, he's a legal professional, legal practitioner, he joins his life from Port Haqqa via video link. Chief, first is Abuja, good morning to you and thank you very much for your time. Yes, good morning Kofi and good morning to Nigerians. For those who would like to understand what exactly the Court of Appeals said, can you please break it down to us, because from what we read it seems like the non-participation or the submission of the federal government legal team was taken as a concession by the federal government's team. Is that what happened? And what did the judge say? It's not a matter of concession, the judgment is very clear and unambiguous to the effect that the unarmed Kanu cannot be tried in Nigeria when the issue of his rendition was forceful, extraordinary rendition, or abduction, if you permit me, and that's exactly the word used by the Court of Appeals has not been resolved or settled by the federal republic of Nigeria. The issue is hanging on the neck of the federal government like a sort of dama The main crux of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, which I commend very, very well, is that Nambi Kanua shouldn't have now reigned or brought before any court of law, for any charge when the manai which is brought into the country is unlawful, it breaches international obligations, international law, it even breaches domestic law and it's criminal in all its essence. So that you cannot, in committing unlawful people seek to seek a benefit. So the federal government doesn't have the powers, they do not, they lack, they mandate whatsoever, both under the constitution and under international law, to rein him in court to charge him for anything when the manai which is brought violates fundamental rights, violates international law, violates domestic law, violates the decency between the committee of nations. That's exactly what the Court of Appeals is saying. And they went for that to say that what the federal government has done amounts to executive recklessness when the judicial body uses that phrase that it tells you something that much more profound than that you have the might of the federal government to do what you like. The first time they use that was when the Lagos state government went into a frolic of its own in Yorjuku property in Lagos. The Supreme Court, I think it's also put a JGSE, Mehearest in the case that clearly stated that it's executive recklessness and there's no better way of putting it and it clearly tells you that it's an act of irresponsibility. It's an act that is unpalatable and it's an act that's unpalatable and it's an act that lacks any legal support. OK, but I was referring to the portion in which the panel of judges said that the respondent in not responding to the applicant's submission are conceded. What do they mean by that? Well, in fact, there are submissions made by a party and the other party does not respond to issues that they have conceded. But that concession is not the point. It's not that the federal court give that judgment on the basis of admission by the federal government lawyers. No, apparently it's very clear that on such very weighty appeal, appeal that has so much weight, I'm surprised that counsel or lawyers will not try to respond to issues of importance that are raised by the appellants. And if they do not raise it or even if they fail to respond to it, it's either that they do not have anything to respond to or the law is just against them and that's what happens. So it's not that the judgment is on the basis of that lack of response on the part of the federal government lawyers, but it's simply on the merits of the fact of the violation of fundamental rights, the violation of international law, the violation of the rules of due process, due process of the law, the fact of the violation of constitutional provisions relating to the fundamental rights of an applicant. So if that's the case, I mean, as it is, like you rightly stated, will that be the reason why the federal government is not honouring the court ruling, I mean the court of appeal to release? And also there's been this argument about Namdi Khan who been discharged and not acquitted. I'd like you to throw more light on that. Being discharged and not acquitted, does it mean that he shouldn't be released or he can go about? There's no reason other than the law and we have to find any justification for the continued detention of Namdi Khan, except for the fact that his right is being continuously violated by the federal government. The judgment of the court of appeal is very, very clear that you cannot charge him if any allegation they have against him relates with or pertains to the fact of the rendition of the reason why he was brought into the court. You cannot charge him. The only option I'm able to the federal government is to appeal and probably their appeal may not even be enough justification. It is not as a matter of fact enough justification to keep him in incarceration because the judgment is very, very clear. And remember it is not just the judgment of the court of appeal. The United Nations Human Rights Commission, which is also the human rights court of the world, has said that Namdi Khan who has not committed any offence known to law and his continued detention and trial and everything amounts to the amounts of violation of his fundamental right. As a matter of fact, the option being sought by the attorney general, Malami, he said there are options. I don't see any option available because I don't see them having any, I mean, any day in the Supreme Court in this matter as far as I'm concerned, it has become quite very, very notorious that we are dealing with persons who do not understand the entrails of the rule of law, the due process of the law. Constitutional supremacy, respect for international obligations and all that. So it's not a matter of discharged and acquitted. Whether he's acquitted or not, it's immaterial. If you look at the text of that job, it clearly says that you cannot charge into court by implication, you don't charge into court for any reason whatsoever. And even those charges that are still there, we are pushing all of them for the reason that the manner in which we brought him to court is of lawful, under international law, under domestic law, under the constitution, under civility, under decency. That's the crux of that judgment. Okay, Chief Oguche, whilst we're trying to get to the next question, please, you can slightly slide your chair a bit backward so that we can have the full compliment of seeing you. Yes, better, that's fine, that's okay. So, Messi was about to ask you a follow-up question, I believe, yeah? Yes, quickly. So I'd like to ask you, what is the reason behind some persons have described the rascality of the executive arm of government, that's the federal government, in constantly, especially in this case, we know they had several cases where the government has not respected the rule of law or has not respected court ruling and injunction. So what exactly is responsible for the executive rascality, if you like to say? How? Why have the federal government over time constantly, and it seems like the federal government is so powerful that no arm of government can check the excesses of the federal government. Because of our peer-use award, recklessness, executive recklessness, the first time the courts used it in Nigeria was under the military. Unfortunately, I think we have been disconnected, he's a legal practitioner, and we hope that we have him back so we can have further discussion as regards all of this. So there's been a lot of talk about whether or not there's an issue with being charged and acquitted, and that's the case. And so the government is also looking for all the legal option. Do we have Festus back? Festus, can you hear us? Yes, I'm here. What I was saying, and it's very, very clear, is that we are looking at the antecedents of some persons in this government. It was immediately, and then I said, Mario Dico was adopted on lovely, you know, I said, technically adopted, so he threw a bottle on them. Within this era, we had the judgment of the United Nations Human Rights Commission. First time we're having that kind of judgment in Nigeria. This failed to abide, so it can implement that judgment. Within this period of, since 2015, no single judgment of the Equals Committee Court of Justice has been obeyed and implemented. No single one of them. All the judgments in the federal government refers to ignore all of them. And I think it begins to see that though the international law is not binding on Nigeria, Nigeria is not a member of the United Nations, a member of the Equals Commission or the African Commission and does not belong to the Committee of Nations. You see, this is not obtaining totalitarian regimes. But there where I made democracy and these things are being done and people are getting away with it. I think this government has had the privilege of the indulgence of the courts much more bigger than any other one. And you will be surprised that it's the same administration that hounded the judges and justices and sent them to prison, treated them like criminals. Within the same government, the CJL, Chief Justice of Nigeria, you know, Walter O'Noggin, was removed from constitutionally. The manner that's marked in discussion total complete indecency. All right. And we are still living. Chief O'Gonchai, just before we go. Yes, yes. Chief O'Gonchai, just before we go, just a last final question to you before we go. Malami has talked about pre-rendition matters with the appeal court, you know, giving it truly on the rendition of Kano. They've said there are some matters that were in existence before he was rendered that are up for judicial determination. In you, if you recall clearly, he was under trial and was released on bail before jumping bail and leaving the country now. Would you expect that Kano will be let go, you know, despite the presence of these pre-rendition or pre-abduction, whichever the case may be, issues and cases and matters that are still up for judicial determination? Because he's proven to be still a flight risk. He's proven, he's done it. So he is a flight risk. I don't know what he means by a pre-rendition matters. The real matter is the judgment of the high courts of injustice, you know why? We don't know it is very, very direct and straightforward to the fact that Kano should be free. Yeah, but Baruch said that is a fundamental, that is a fundamental rights enforcement case. But before Kano was, yes, yeah. But on the charges of treason, before he was taken out of the country, he is facing trial for treason. Now, the appeal court, like you rightly said, has ruled on how he was brought into the country and they say was unconstitutional. Having said that he is already in Nigeria and he has a case to answer, and he was released on bail and jumped bail. So should the government, you know, should they throw away the formal case? Is that case still not on? Can they still not take him to court? Go clean the matter, you and I can not sit here and circumvent the judgment of the court of appeals. The judgment is very straight forward. And so also his man and me, he can not circumvent the judgment of, what does he mean by pre-election matters? Because of appeal he said that anything concerning him relating to the issue of which he was adopted cannot be tried in any court. Very straightforward. I took a careful look, a very circumspective look of that judgment and that's what he's saying. The judgment of the haircut of Umayya is very, very irrelevant here because he granted him, the judge granted bail to Namdikano from that court and that judgment will not respect him. So what pre-election matter will stop you from releasing somebody on bail, somebody who's been discharged by the court of appeal. I remember that the issue concerning Namdikano is one that invokes a whole lot of things. International criminal responsibility is there. And if I'm in one of these shoes, I will try to be a little bit careful to know the extent of my involvement because these things have a way of boomeranging on those in authority, particularly state actors. If at the end of the day, it is discovered they were passed on those who have adopted, firstly adopted the citizens from Kenya. All right, let's go back. I'd like to ask you this, we're really out of time just in a few seconds. Do you think that this is politically motivated? This is another dimension of the conversation.  It's almost the same thing that happened in 2019. Now it's happening. And some people think that this judgment or the ruling of the court of appeal has, you know, there's a hand of politician. And it probably might just be, you know, the hand ahead of the 2023 elections. I'd like you to show your thoughts on that in a few seconds. Well, it's not something I can do in a few seconds because we all know the fact of the extent of political interference into the judicial affairs going by the final constitution allows the executive to make a point to promote and to give them room to meddle in the judicial affairs. But in a long time, we've been making case for the exclusion of the judiciary from the reign of our face, from the running of our face, you know, and the judicial system can always regulate itself and be self exclusive. But I don't see the hand of the judiciary or the politicians here. Like what happened is a case of clear court violation of fundamental rights. All right, all right. Chief, yeah, Chief, I'm sorry to interrupt you. Oh, yeah. Yes, I'm sorry to interrupt you. Please, for the want of time, we'll have to pull the plugs at this point. But we'll definitely have you back sooner than later to discuss this is all important matter. Because we need, I think 12 minutes is not even enough. Some lawyers are saying that the man has to answer for the original matter that took him to court. No, but if you... Sorry, Messi, for which he jumped bail. Now, what the court is saying is that, oh, okay, you approached us to appeal how you were brought into the country, how you were brought into the country was wrong. That's fine. But there is a matter that was there, it was granted, but he jumped bail. So has that matter been determined? The answer is no. And what Malami is saying is that that matter still needs to be determined. The court still needs to decide whether he can be... No, so coffee is very simple. I mean, let's move on. I think it's very simple. So Nigerians need to be clear on this that NAMD Canada has all been cleared of the charges. No, but that's not the reason why. It's like saying, give me money to do X, Y, Z. And you're saying I have money for this.  Money has been released or a certain injunction has been given. You need to obey that first. Respect the order that has been given. And then whatever consensus that you have, you can always follow up with it. For me, it's not an opinion. So I don't think that there should be contination. And that's what he's talked about, that if a court has moved, we should move forward. It's not about Malami. That's what we're saying. So it has nothing to do with what he stated it. The injunctions are quite clear. Whether or not the government has an issue, a statement has been put out. It's expected that you respect it. And let's move on. And that's what it is. For me, it's not my personal. I'm just trying to paint the picture for people to see where Malami is. But he stated it rightly. And that the courts did not speak in. We're here to paint to tell people what's going on. The court has not spoken in different language. I mean, like he stated, is we're emphasizing that the statements are clear? That is not what I'm saying that at least they should also get where Malami is coming from so they can have a balance view. That's all. As to whether Malami is right or wrong, that's not what I'm talking about. But it is a very heated subject, and I think we'll have some more time to talk about this. We'll take a break and when we come back, we'll look at our second major discussion this morning. Please stay with us.