OK, next up is Timo with cellular. Welcome Timo. Hi. OK, I'm Timo. Let's talk about Timo today. I'm assuming he wants me to be here. I do some kind of programming library. I support all the employees in the new role. I encourage like that, some kind of formatting thing, like really some kind of extension, sort of printed formatting, a printed template degree. And you probably ended up with this choice. Both of takes my job in sub-log file, somewhere he doesn't serve up. And that's really fine. I mean, the human eye can teach us what happens in there. Until some days or later, he just shows up and we ask him, I am doing just, doing a list of all the customers for which we have this login tree with this volume, with this type of encoding and stuff like that.  And you are trying to extract your data from your log files when you really just had it in the first place pretty well separated from your log statements. So that's kind of the idea to go beyond takes place login where you're really writing just log messages, just big blocks of strings all over the place. It's good to watch structured login while not writing the messages, but log events. So it's really just kind of keeping the collections of information at more inches than the kind of stuff. So the idea with that is you will just start logging kind of the same way. You have your login statements. Except instead of throwing away straight away the data you're formatting, you kind of keep it around. You keep it around to capture it. So instead of doing string f formatting, you're actually storing the structure of the data all along with the message template. You can see it properly, but you're waiting until the last minute to actually format it into a log message. And once you have that in place, actually it's pretty cool because you defer rendering until the end. So you can still, if you want, somehow this way to format it at the last minute into some kind of log file. But you can actually use this structure of data you've been storing in a store that supports more powerful things. Like for instance, a document store where you just store that thing and be able to pre-read it later on. Or you can store that in actually some kind of hybrid storage, like originally the database has support for this in pre-reading or semi-pre-reading of structured data, I think. Or to store it in LSD search, store it in re-uname it. Or on some sort of specific log server. So the idea is that once you have actually this information stored with your events, you can actually use tools to query it. And what's really interesting later on is your big walls, lots, lots, lots of events. You can start doing really useful stuff with all these properties you've been storing appending to your events. You can do lots of query or change stuff like just give me all the events with the same HTTP which should be requested and then correlate and track the moves of your users in the system. That's really pretty cool. So it's just really a quick introduction to structured data logging. I'm here to promote a bit like I've done in several logins. It's a .NET library. It works for a platform with a bit more than 6.5 million downloads. Oh yeah, that's done in the open source community. I don't know if you heard about that. Sorry, this is one more. Go to our website where you get a report and the industry has its questions. Thank you for explaining that. Thank you very much.


Siva rights advocacy group Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria, Huriwa, said that the office of the senate president should be zoned to the south east. Addressing newsmen in a Buja national coordinator, Huriwa, Komredi Manuel Omubiko, drum support for Eboni state governor, Devi Omahi, saying that he is the best man for the job. Omubiko warned against giving the senate presidency to a Muslim, stating emphatically that it would be dangerous to tow such a path. He said that it is very dangerous for the Muslim brothers to be eyeing the office of the senate president when there are other prestigious offices to follow, like the speaker of the House of Representatives. Loving a party that has a self-made ticket to produce a president and vice president is going to be very devastating for the country. So if you want to have a Muslim president, a Muslim vice president and a Muslim senate president, and it looks like they give you the jikto of Nigeria social movement because you have a movement there, I think the mother is there, jikto of Nigeria social movement. And we are saying it is very dangerous to that. So it is bad for those who want to elect their leaders in the senate to either divide the country further by installing a Muslim senate president we think that the state in place is a senate presidential zone. I think it is only to do with the state, the chairman of the southeast government forum for five percent to be a senate president in our own assessment. Hello, hope you enjoyed the news. Please do subscribe to our YouTube channel and don't forget to hit the notification button so you get notified about fresh news updates.


How many people out there question their own consumption of television and other forms of passive entertainment? Hey there, NJ, root22.com here with a little Friday discussion about entertainment and television. This crossed my mind a lot lately because we don't do really any passive entertainment here, you know, when you have a house to take care of and family and pets and blogs and blogs to write, you just really don't find yourself entertaining yourself much. And I wonder how many other people out there question their own consumption of television and and you know, what a streaming media and just going on on social media spending hours upon hours gazing at other people's lives and so on. Instead of creating something, building something, learning something, you know, a lot of I see a lot of younger people out there who, you know, forego the educational process or jobs to try and just experience life, which when you think about it, experiencing and going on vacation is sort of a passive form of entertainment as well. Now I'm going to go here and sit by the pool and drink my ties and take pictures of myself in a bikini or a thong. I don't know. I just want to like, I see some people, well, I only watch a half hour of TV a day and I did the math and quickly in my head and a half hour a day of television watching, for instance, is four and a half weeks of full work weeks, full 40-hour work weeks, or an hour a day is nine weeks of working. Imagine in two hours a day you're pushing, you know, almost, and that's 18 weeks of 40-hour work weeks that could be done doing something else. Imagine you had 18 hour, I mean, 18 weeks to learn how to, like, carpentry or to learn how to fix a car or plumbing. It's just amazing and I just don't, I can't understand it anymore. I mean coming from a camp that used to have a DVR back in the day before they had streaming and I would have to catch up on my shows. Oh, I have seven shows. I have to watch some or my hard drive is going to be full. And I would sit there for hours and most of the time that included eating, junk food, pizza, chips, beer and and, you know, three, four hours a day sometimes. And did you get anything from it? I mean, it's not like, you know, if I spent my time learning something in my spare time outside of the learning, I'm still thinking about the learning process. And the same was true for television. I would watch a, like a gripping TV show, I don't know, 24 or something like that. I used to watch alias too. This shows how long ago it was and I would, you know, there'd be times throughout the day or when I'm not watching television that I would be using my brain time to think about the television show. So that's even more time wasted. So it's just fascinating. And I know a lot of people talk about this and people are starting to watch less TV. But at the same time, some people are probably watching even more. Because I see people watching TV on their little phones on a four or five inch or six inch screen. What consuming media and laughing, haha, they're like, they're not even looking around the world to see how things work or trying to connect the dots and how people live and what's changed in their neighborhood. Or in the last 10 years, hey, look, there's more people that weren't born here now. Or, wow, these people have a lot more money than I do. Or look at the kind of cars people are buying. They're all hybrids. I wonder if they're, you know, paying a lease or did they buy it off? Now, it's like you could put your mind to better use. And another thing people say, well, I'm just relaxing after a long day. And I don't know if just watching passive entertainment like television movies is really considered rest. If you really want to rest after a long day, you should probably get an extra half hour or hour of sleep because that does a lot of good. Your body will rebuild and your cells will regenerate and you have some good REM sleep if you don't drink too much. So I just wonder why. And I know YouTube and all these streaming channels, like the one this is streaming on or playing on, it has replaced TV for a lot. And I have to admit, I do use YouTube from time to time, but most of the time, it's for educational purposes. I do look at a lot of repair videos and only after I've tried repairing something myself that I that I look at those things is I think trying things by yourself first. First hand is a good starting point. And if only after repeated failures or frustration might you go to the vault of information online, but that's it. I just wonder how many people are starting to think about whether watching television and sitting down and doing nothing is really worth it for you.  Like at what point would you become bored and want a purpose in your life? So I think TV fills just this fine line because the people I watch TV 20 hours a day end up dying young because they get sick and obese. I don't know. That's it. Something for you to think about this weekend. Have a good weekend.


Let's give you, we're going to explain an example of ABR assembly program. So as we said before, an assembly program should start always first defining its data. So let's assume we start our section defining four integers. Let's use the labels N1 dot by 10, N2 dot by 20. Remember that these initialize one byte to 10 and 20 respectively, the third number N3 dot by 30 and N4 dot by 40. And let's assume that my program wants to add all these numbers and the result wants to be store, will be store in an extra byte that we declare like this, space one, zero. One byte with value zero. Now the way these things are laid out in memory, remember that this definition would be identical to using something like this dot by 10 comma 20 comma 30 comma 40. That would be exactly the same. Then remember that after the data section, we can define another section with the dot section dot text directive in which we do dot global. Main to declare the main label as global. And then with main column, we start the definition of the code which typically finishes with the instruction red to say that we return and the directive dot N. Now what kind of operations are we going to do here? Again, the program has to add these four numbers and place result here. One first operation we would do is to load with instruction LDS in R24, register 24, the number and N1. And we can do exactly with this instruction. Now remember, this label over here, what it's telling us is that we are loading in R24 the content in memory which corresponds to label N1. Another way of looking at it, this directive actually translates into memory in something like this. This is position N1, N2, N3, N4 and result. And we have the values 10, 20, 30 and 40 here and a zero here waiting for the result to be stored. Now this instruction would take the value pointed to by N1 number 10 and load it into R24. We can do the same LDS, suppose R17 with N2. And then we can add R24, R17. Now what have we achieved here? After this instruction what we have is the R24 contains the value N1 plus N2. However, we can use these labels in a different way. So this instruction would be equivalent to perform the following. Suppose that I first load the immediate in R26, L08 and N1 next to this LDI, R27, HI8 and N1. What have I done here? These two instructions load into the register R27 followed by R26 which by the way it's also called X. In register X now I have the address of the label N1. Now what am I going to do with this? Well, I want to achieve exactly the same as this instruction which means I need to bring from memory having the address in register X. I want to bring from memory the number 10 and load it into register R24. The way to do that is with instruction all the LD, I bring it to R24. And then, this is the important part, I can use this syntax X plus. So what I'm doing here is I'm going to memory with an address which is part stored in the register X. I'm going to memory where this location is pointing to which is of course N1. I'm getting the value 10, I'm storing it in R24 but and this is the important part, the register X is incremented. Which means that X which started with the address pointing to this number after this instruction, number 10 will end up in R24 and the address will point to the next position. So as you can see what I'm getting at is that the microprocessor allows me to first load the address in one register which is the concatenation of R27 and R26 which we know we call X. And in the same instruction it allows me to go to memory to whatever that address is pointing to, get the value and at the same time increase the value I want. So as you can imagine these three instructions over here achieve exactly the same as this one that loads N1 in R24. Now you'll be asking yourself, why are you doing this in three instructions if you can do it with one? Well, this is just to show different ways of accessing data. The other trick that I'm interested in showing is that now I have a very interesting situation. Register X contains the address of the following number to add. So I could do something like this, LD R17 comma X plus. And this would achieve exactly the same as this instruction here. So you see what I did is now R17 gets the value 20. Why? Because X was left increased by the previous instruction and therefore is pointing to the next number. Not only that, the following after executing this instruction X it's going to point now to this value here. So I could keep working on the expression doing the following now LD R17 X plus. And now what I'm doing here is that R17 now has the value of N3 or 30. And I can add it again add R24 R17. So in this case R24 has N1 plus N2 plus N3. And the other interesting thing is that X got incremented again. Therefore now its address or its value is the address of the following number to add. So I can repeat this instruction LD R17 X plus. And yet again add R24 R17. And therefore R24 now has N1 plus N2 plus N3 plus N4. So again I could have executed instead of these instructions. This one and this one instructions similar to these two. Right? Because I put the labels N3 and N4. But this alternative way of doing it is to show that the microprocessor allows me to use a register of 16 bits of course. Because the addresses in AVR architecture are 16 bits. It allows me to use that register and increment it in one position. Which is very useful when I need to access data that are stored in consecutive positions in memory. There is only a couple of things left for me to do. We said that we wanted the result to be stored here. So one way I can do that is ST X R24. Why? Because after accessing this element in this instruction. The value of the address in X is now left pointing to the result. Because I defined them in consecutive positions. So in here what I'm doing is result equal to N1 plus N2 plus N3 plus N4. Now there is only one thing left for me to do. I've used three registers. Sorry four registers. R26, R27, R24 and R17. These are the four registers I've used. If you check the rules that we need to observe in terms of register. You realize that these three registers can be used freely. However R17 needs to be saved and restored. Therefore our problem is not correct yet. We need to first execute before this sequence of instructions. Push R17 to save its value. Because we are overriding it here. And before we finish we do the opposite or the symmetric operation. Pop R17. And as you can see what we have done is not only preserve the value of R17. But also the stack at points A and B. The stack is exactly the same. I arrive with certain stack here. I put a temporary value, remove the temporary value. I'm ready now to terminate the program with exactly the same stack. Now let's summarize six points that are very important in this program. First I can access N1 directly with destruction LDS. Remember LDS, R24 and 1. But I can also access N1 indirectly through its address loaded in X. And that was instruction LD.  And I can add this which is called a post increment. Which by the way is optional. You can use it or not. But if you plan to access the following data in memory, it's very convenient because it leaves the register already modified and pointing to the next data. We can again store data directly with instruction STS. So we could have done something like STS result R24. And this instruction would replace this one over here. It would be exactly equivalent. However, since we already had register X, that has been used to access this position. And then it was post incremented. Register X at this point was already pointing there. Therefore, we can also store indirectly. And this is instruction STX R24. Finally, the other two options or the other two aspects that we observe here is that we saved and restore R17. Very important because it's one of the registers that we need to observe that rule. And the end is that start and finish the program with the same. And what I mean is in positions A that is here and here. And this concludes the example of the assembly program.


Both class and caste have economic dimensions. Both class and caste have political and cultural dimensions. Both class and caste have consequences around natural issues. So how do we, you know, when we put these two together, how do we get a richer analysis? You know, that is the project. My name is Vamsi Vakula Varnal. I teach economics at the University of Massachusetts, I was a grantee at the Institute for New Economic Thinking, and I'm also co-directing the Asian Political Program at the University of Massachusetts at SAMHSA. I'm working on this project called Class and Inequality in India and China, and it's actually a forthcoming book. And so this book is all about how to view inequality-related issues in China and India through the lens of class and Marxian understanding of class. And there's a lot of work on inequality in China, and there's also a lot of work on inequality in India, but there's very little work that focuses on the axis of class. And what it does is, you know, apart from helping us characterize these economies, you know, in class regimes, it also throws light on the deeper social dynamics, you know, that drive the economic processes in both these countries. And on top of it, it also helps us understand the nature of the state, nature of the Chinese state, nature of the Indian state in class terms. And, you know, doing this analysis also gives us an insight into within-country inequality dynamics.  Kuznets says, you know, it's an inverted U-shaped curve. Inequality rises first and then declines. And in the case of Piketty, he argues that after a decline in the middle of the 20th century, you know, inequality is continuously rising. So my argument is a little bit different using class analysis. I argue that, you know, it's the particular nature of capitalist crises that drive inequality regimes. Depending on the nature of the crisis, a particular kind of inequality regime, you know, is unleashed, which either, you know, leads to rising inequality or it could also lead to declining inequality. It depends on the particular institutional configuration that emerges in response to particular capitalist crisis. So using class, you know, gives us, you know, all these rich dynamics of the underlying economies of China and India. Another forthcoming book that I have is with a co-author, Mr. Mothina, is titled, tentatively, Vanishing Mosaics, Changing Landscapes of Indian Cities.  So we look, in particular, we look at, you know, the axes of gender, religion, class and caste in the Indian context, and see how city space interacts with each of these axes. So just to give you a couple of examples, so when you take something like gender, you know, and how city space interacts with gender, the key insight is that, you know, city spaces are very gendered, you know, and it actually has a significant impact on something as basic as, you know, labor force participation rates of women. So depending on how the city space is structured, we are comparing two cities in India, Bombay and Mumbai right now and Hyderabad. Mumbai has much better public transportation infrastructure.  Are there work opportunities in the city neighborhood where women reside? That determines their labor force participation rate. Similarly, if you take the axis of religion, what we found about Indian cities is Muslims are, you know, ghettoized and the ghettoization process is, you know, deepening in the Indian context right now.  At those levels, if you have more mixed neighborhoods, it has a very significant outcome, which is there are better development outcomes for the people who live in these mixed neighborhoods. So for instance, you know, what we found is, you know, poverty outcomes are much better. You know, there are fewer poor people if the neighborhoods are more mixed, or, you know, there are better educational opportunities if neighborhoods are more mixed. So what we find is, you know, whether it is religion, whether it is something like caste, you know, the social group, social kind of grouping in India, when the neighborhood becomes more mixed, you know, there are better development outcomes. Even striking finding, you know, we compared, you know, similar geographical city tracts in the western countries and Indian cities, something like census tract here and, you know, border, sub district in Indian cities. And what we find is Indian neighborhoods tend to be much more mixed, and western city neighborhoods are much more segregated. So, but then, you know, over the last 30 years, with economic reforms, the neoliberal economic reforms, you know, segregation processes are also deepening in Indian cities. So our work, you know, highlights the nature of Indian cities, nature of these landscapes, and also how these landscapes are undergoing change quickly. So using these four axes, the social axes of religion, gender, class, and caste, and making them interact with city space, we are able to arrive at this outcome. And there's also a lot of policy, advocacy work that can come out of, you know, these insights. Partly coming out of this, you know, book, I've also been thinking about a deeper theoretical question, which is, you know, how do, you know, in India, there are a lot of thinkers who privilege class, you know, Marxist thinkers or communist parties that privilege the category of class, and they argue that this is the only axis that matters, you know, to understand society, and, or the primary, you know, the fundamental axis, whereas there are lots of other kinds of thinkers, you know, social theorists, activists who privilege caste. And there's no unity, you know, there's a lack of trust between, you know, these two groups, although they seem to be working on similar issues, issues of backwardness, issues of lack of privilege, issues of lack of dignity, issues surrounding exploitation in the workplace, they don't see eye to eye.  You know, what are the class dynamics that underlie Indian capitalism? And what are the social dynamics, you know, that have been part of the Indian context for a very long time? How do you bring these two together theoretically? And, and using class caste in a composite sense, how do we make an analysis of Indian, you know, let's say the social formation that is Indian capitalism? So, so that is, you know, an ongoing project, you know, this is going to be written in the, you know, next one or two years. And it's a, you know, a lot of on-the-ground kind of work, practice, has worked with something like, you know, both class and caste issues fused, you know, in an activist space or a policy space. But it has not been adequately theorized yet. People talk about the importance of both, but, you know, so for instance, something like, you know, both class and caste have economic dimensions. Both class and caste have political and cultural dimensions. Both class and caste have consequences around natural issues. So, how do we, you know, when we put these two together, how do we get a richer analysis? You know, that is the project. And, and this could also feed off from and feed into, you know, composite analysis, let's say, in the American or European context, combining class and race or class and gender, right? So, how do we combine two axes, right? So that would be the theoretical contribution.


Okay, so thanks for the invitation. It's really good to be back in Trieste. And in this talk I'm going to try to answer this question that we asked in this paper with Elena Giuzarma from Rome, Olga Mena from Valencia, and Hector Ramirez was around in any case there's some nasty questions so you can ask him so he's there. So during this meeting, sorry, this is the outline. So I'm going to take you about some motivation while we ask this question. And then I represent the feed, the result, and there's no problem with this. And at the end, so I will comment on future constraints and inclusion. Okay, so during this meeting, so it's clear that we have some pretty good, pretty detailed picture of the universe, basically through three sets, three basic sets of experiments. So CMV, large-scale structure, and also NVIDIA simulation, which are also a kind of numerical experiment. And the whole picture that we call Lambda CDM holds together once we specify some initial conditions. And I am sure that you agree that among all the theories or the mechanism that we have, so basically inflation has a special place. These are a couple of slides just to remind you what inflation is. What kind of inflation I'm talking about. It's just single-field, slower inflation where we have a scalar field minimally coupled. This is the only sentence that you have to retain from this slide. Minimally coupled to gravity. And then once some conditions are satisfied, so we have really a set of prediction that are really impressive agreement with the data. So with respect to inflation, so the alternatives are less elegant. And there's some debate about that, but I'm sure most of you agree, except maybe Justin, who was here last week. But in any case, I'm going to focus on this simple picture and try to see whether this picture can be made more natural. So as I said, inflation has a special place among the early-inverse scenarios for initial conditions. However, it has some problems. For instance, as I showed you before, so we always assume that the inflow of scalar field is minimally coupled to gravity. And this is not the most general situation. Another problem that is related to this one that I will argue later on is the fact that we always assume that there is a normalizable potential and we don't include the normalizable interactions just because of simplicity. So basically, these terms are elected for convenience. So this is also a problem, a conceptual problem, but it should be addressed as a point if you want to understand inflation from an effective field theory upon the viewer or as a consistent theory. And this is hard to justify. In fact, if you consider shift symmetry, that is the only symmetry that you can think of when you're doing inflation, it's broken by the potential and also this nominal coupling that I will tell you about. So we ask this question whether this nominal coupling of the inflow is preferred or is it ruled out or what is the situation. So this is a list of partial list of papers of talented people that ask this question maybe in different context, but it's related to us. So this is the motivation. So the nominal couplings are expected in general and you can justify the presence in many ways. For instance, you can think of the inflaton as being coupled to a light degree to freedom that will hit at the end of the inflation, which is the usual picture. And these couplings will generate some non-trivial, non-zero, non-minimal coupling through the RGE. So once you include the one-loop corrections to this xi, the non-minimal coupling, so you will see that the running will generate a non-vanishing xi. And the property of this equation, which is very well known, except when you have a conformal coupling, when xi is one-sixth, so you have always a non-minimal coupling generated by the running and the magnitude is given by this basically. It's logarithmically sensitive to the scale. So you see that even if you start with a vanishing xi at some scale, so you generate it. The second argument is that, so one can say always that you can rephrase the dynamics. So suppose that you have this Lagrangian. I probably don't see that. So you start with this Lagrangian, which is a general one with a non-minimal coupling. But then, okay, so we consider, for instance, the working example that we will focus here in our talk. We will focus on the M squared, five-square scenario, which is the simplest one. You can always rephrase the dynamics in the Einstein frame. And Einstein frame is just making a way of scaling where we have this pre-factor for the metric. And then we are back to our familiar form with a new scalar field, calorific normalised, and with a new potential. So the new potential is related to the old one by the, this is you, by the way, is the old potential divided by the conformal factor, square of the conformal factor. And if we consider, for instance, this kind of, this kind of conformal factor where, I mean, this is just an expansion around with small side. So we see that if we expand it, we have new operators that are created and especially the non-minimal ones. So we can turn around this argument and say that if we have some theory, inflationary theory model with non-normalised operators, so we can always write it as a non-minimally coupled theory. So that's basically the motivation that led us to consider this non-minimally coupled. Okay, so now this is the fit that we did. So basically we took M squared, five-square model that we see here in red dots, and we add a non-minimal coupling. And we see what are the bounds on this non-minimally coupled by using Monte Carlo chains. So we see as we know that, for instance, the M squared, five-square scenario is already under tension with respect to the new data. It depends on the number of e-folds, but for instance, for 50 e-fold, it's outside the two sigma confidence levels. And we see that the positive non-minimally coupling is favored, because as you see here, this represents the magnitude of this non-minimally coupling. And for negative xi, so you follow this trajectory, while for positive one, so you go back to the one sigma confidence level of black for it to snow. And you see that the magnitude of this xi is of other 10 to minus three. Okay, more details. So you see now that we have a slight preference for non-managing xi. So this is the pdf of xi, and this is of other 10 to minus three, while also you have also a non-vanishing also for r, for tensor to scalar ratio. Okay, so this is to be compared with the situation without non-minimally coupling, for instance with Planck's 2515, we see that the pdf of r, I mean visually it doesn't show any preference for non-managing r. So in the context of this model, it's easy to understand because this model, there is a non-trivial correlation between ns and r, so you cannot push r low without having a non-managing xi. Okay, so there is a slight preference for non-managing non-minimally coupling. Let's see how much. So we see that, okay, so these are the results for some set of parameters, for a number of e4, 60, and 50, and we see that basically the central value is around 10 to minus 3. So this is 0.03, or 3 by 10 to minus 3. While the tensor to scalar ratio is around 0.04, 0.46. Okay, so in order to answer the question that we are asking in the title of the talk, so we must be more quantitative, and in order to be so, we should compare the distributions for both vanishing and non-managing non-minimally coupling. The simplest thing to do is to compare the chi-square, and we compare the chi-square for a minimally coupled and non-minimally coupled theory. By taking into account that there is an additional degree of freedom in xi, and we see that obviously the chi-square decrease, however it decreases in such a way that there is a statistical significance to that. So the xi is favored to be non-zero, and as the p-value with this set of data indicates it's very significant. So that's 99% confidence level. Okay, so it's interesting also to look at the excursion. So one can imagine that since we are considering some more complete theory of m-square phi-square, so the excursion might be smaller. So it turned out that for the values that we found, the effect of xi, non-minimally coupled, is not so relevant because it's so small. So basically phi and bar phi are related by this usual expression. And for the values of xi that we find, the excursion is still super-planked. So it doesn't fix the problem of super-planked excursion. I mean, in this sense it's still not satisfactory. Okay, what are the future constraints on this scenario? So in the context of Planck 2015, so there is this slight preference, what can we say in the future constraints? So we can construct a combination of first-order observables, and we see that, okay, in the case of m-square phi-square, this combination vanishes at order 1 over n on a cube. And if we are able to measure the left-hand side of this equation at this precision, which is the one that these observations are aiming to, we can probe xi at the level of 10 to the minus 4. Also, we can combine this with accurate measurement of ns because, as I said, there is a non-trivial correlation between ns and r in this kind of scenarios. So suppose that the bounds of r go down by one order of magnitude, so 0.1, so this will push ns outside the one sigma, the measure, for instance, the central value of Planck, and this will rule out completely the model. So this is one way of falsifying it. The second way is to look at the running. So this is the running with respect to the value of the non-minimal coupling. And we see that, okay, so this is the m-square phi-square prediction. So for negative xi, there is a significant running. However, as I said that for negative xi, this higher r, so it's already ruled out. However, so we can hope that with some more accurate measurement of the running, so if you measure running bigger than that, so because we are here, so the preferred values are here, we can say something about this model. And as an example, so there's a lot of experiment as an example, so there is a proposal in Caltech called Cypher X, and it promises to reach this impressive number, so it's like 6 by 10 to minus 4 in alpha s. And this is in this way, so one can hope to probe, okay, among the other models also this kind of scenario and to say something about it. Okay, so these are the conclusions. So the answer to the question is yes, the current data have a preference for a nominal by a couple phi-square, and the next round of observation will falsify or ruled out the scenario, especially combined with the measurement of NS and R because of the non-trivial correlation I explained, and more futuristic ones like 21 cm will certainly answer this question more accurately.


Well, we've reached the end of the day and hopefully you can see that porting to the STM32 MP1, we've made it as easy as possible. So what you've seen, you've seen what the device has and our embedded software distribution. You've seen the role that the Cortex-M4 can play within an application as the real-time or co-processor in the system. You've seen, based on the fact that we've taken standard Linux and we've mainlined all the drivers, that it's easy to move to the MP1. There's not real much change in that side. And thanks to all the ST ecosystem, anything that you're doing with existing Cortex-M devices can all be reused inside the MP1 design. So now, based on all that information that you've received, you should now be able to select a particular MP1. You've had a play around with the VM image, so you've seen the environment and how to develop. We've been in and out of the wiki or we've referred you to different parts of the wiki on and off, so you can see where to find all this information. And when you get back to your offices, you've got all the slides, you can get your hands on a board and you can play around with one of those freed packages we've got. So start a package for just playing around with biners and scripts, developers package where you can modify and develop proper applications. Further information, you can always contact the region levelese like myself. We have our online support, which is myst.com, and probably for about the 100th time today, the wiki.st.com. So we keep referring you back to that wiki for all the relevant information. If you forget anything that you've learned today, this course should be coming on the online training soon. So you should be able to find it in the online training catalogue. And you've also got the communities out there. So you can all do the questions and answers in the community. It's monitored by third party people, it's monitored by ST people. So we'll give you the best information to help you design your end application. Hope you've had a really good day and thank you for listening to the MP1 workshop.


Beer battered chicken tenders with honey mustard. This is actually the chicken tenders that I used to make in the bar that I started working at back in 2010. You guys, I saw the batter and I had to share this recipe with you. Check out how I made it. So I saw this fry mix the other day and that's what reminded me of this recipe. Put you some of the mix in a bowl. I'm using Country Boy, Nacho Bait, Habanero Blondel. Now, Danos did not exist at this time, but I got Danos Chipotle. You know we're adding some of that in there. So we just mix it up. More beer. Peanut oil going in. Throw them in the batter. You gotta wave it back and forth and don't just drop it in because it'll stick to the bottom. We are all done. You get the crispy beer batter and look at that tender chicken. Yum yum, get you some. Let me know what you think. Leave a like, leave a comment, hit the follow button. We'll see you next time. Keep sprinkling.


Hello, I'm here to do the hand sanitizer challenge. So I will donate $1 to medical teams international for every flip that it takes me to get this bottle to stand upright. Okay, so here it goes. One. So the first rule is that you have to announce ahead of time how much you're going to donate. Two. The second rule is that you have to flip until it lands. Three. The third rule is that you then have to donate whatever you said you would. Oops. Four. The fourth rule is to make up your own rule and I'll explain what my rule is at the end. Alright, so let's keep going. Five. Eight. This is going to get expensive. Nine. Ten. Eleven. Now, I know that this may seem kind of frivolous maybe and I know that this is a time where people are kind of panicking about things, so I'm not trying to make light of that situation. And I am aware of the criticism of slacktivism, we're sitting at home doing nothing and doing things online. It doesn't really do anything. But since we're stuck at home anyway, I figure this can't hurt. So if you're stuck at home, you might want to try this and donating money. There's lots of organizations that need money, so it's a good thing. Now I've lost track, but you guys are keeping track because I'll add those in. Ooh, that was close. Okay, sorry, let me concentrate now. Okay, this is me editing a few days later. Let me break in to say a couple things. This is going to take forever. This is going to be a long, boring video if I do this wrong. Ooh, close. No, it was not close. And yes, it is a long, boring video. Sorry about that. But I wanted to tell you that first of all, I'm not cutting this because I wanted you to see it was all one take, the first try. And then also, maybe some of you have noticed that this is the second time I uploaded this video. Seems like it got close. Nope. I wasn't close there either. The second time I uploaded the video because the first time I accidentally left my credit card info in there, but I've blurred that out in this version. All right, so that's why there's two versions now. Sorry about that. I deleted the other one. Back to the video. My friend, Mark, did this in 12 tries. Hey, I did it in 12. Good job. Oh, got close, but it fell off the end. Got to make sure it's tight. I've never done this in my life before, never tried it before. So at some point, I may make a video about what this whole experience has been like being stuck at home during this 2020 pandemic or whatever they end up calling it. The 2020 coronavirus pandemic. Fortunately, we've been relatively unaffected compared to so many people in the rest of the world. But it is still kind of a strange situation. I'll make a vlog about it and link to it. I must be doing something wrong. This is not going to be a fun video to watch. Maybe I'll speed it up for you guys. Oh, close. If I'd gotten that, what would that mean? Maybe I only have to donate half if I end up with it on top.  For some of you who want to try to do this, like try to make it land in there or something like that, that'd be cool. Or do this, or maybe get this to land right. Haha, that doesn't count. Or maybe do two at a time. I brought another one. This is going to be harder though. I don't know if this is going to, let me try. Ooh, maybe I'll try this one. Ah, this is kind of making a mess. I don't want to waste that. Okay, back to this one. Goodness, this is going to take a long time. All right, nobody wants to see the toilet paper. There must be some technique. I feel like I'm getting close. I got it, yay. So I lost track, but I am going to donate that many dollars to medical teams international. So here's my fourth rule. I was going to say that I will list the next five people who comment on my video and upload their own videos. I will, the first five people that submit their own videos, I will put in the comments and highlight you in the description. I was going to say however number it was, I would do that many, but I lost track and I don't think I can do 40 or 50 or whatever that was. So the first five people that comment, I will put you in the description below. Also, if maybe I'll do five honorary mentions too. So my favorite five creative ideas like, I don't know, like doing this and like doing this or whatever, if you can come up with some cool idea, do that too. So maybe rule number six is to make sure that this top is on. All right, so I did it and here is a picture of me donating the money online. Now, I would like to see some other people do this. So specifically, I'd be curious to see what happens when Zach King does this and Sam Chewy and then also Professor Dave explains, could you do this also? And then Dude Perfect, I'd love to see what you guys come up with if you do this hand sanitizer challenge. And then finally, How Ridiculous. Okay, so there's my video. I'm curious to see what you guys come up with. All right, take it easy, bye.


It's a UK chicken industry. There's the smell of cooking chicken wings in the air, the bones of little birds wings showered across the tables and it bins everywhere. It's incredibly loud here. I don't think we'll be able to talk to anyone because it's so loud, but I've got a different idea. Let's do it. Can we buy more? I think that's enough though. Yeah. For what happens inside farms and slaughterhouses for chickens. Oh, you're the vegan people. I'm a vegan too.  Yeah. Bless you, brother. What is it?  Good work. I was hoping we'd be able to set up these out the front of the wing fest. There was no space. Too loud to even talk inside of there. So what we've done, we've got a bunch of VFC here. Popcorn chicken, we've got the chicken bites, we've got the chicken fillets. We're showing some chicken footage. We're going to see if we can persuade people to eat VFC instead of tortured animals. And we're going to ask what people think of the wing fest slash the cruelty fest. Want to show us some mate? We heard about this. I didn't know it was on. When is it on next? The wing fest. Yeah. This is a wing fest protest. We're showing people what happens in slaughterhouses and farms. I'm all up for it. This is not chicken. This is vegan. This is this. Do you like it? There's no animals in there. I don't eat all that stuff anyway. Do you? Yeah. Oh wow. Do you? It's good to hear. Want some free food? Free food? Come on, take some. Try one. What do you think it's made from? I'm going to assume it's plant-based, just because you said that. I actually filmed this footage. Did you? Yeah, I went into the shed. This is a parent breeder shed. This is where the mums and dads are of the chickens that people eat. They fertilize the eggs, and then the eggs hatch and they become the chickens that people eat. That's quite nice. You've got your train. That's vegan? Yeah. That's this. VFC. It's good. Trying to stop people from harming the chickens on Earth. About a billion a year tortured and killed in England. Do you hear about the Wingfest? No. There's a Wingfest here and about 60,000 wings are going to be eaten. You've got your train. In Derby. He's got a train to catch. Oh yeah, that's all right. Thank you. Done the old train segue. I've heard that one before. Oh, it's a vegan. Yeah. Are you a vegan? No, I'm vegetarian. Why aren't you a vegan? It's a journey in it. Is it? Yeah. For me, I want to start out being vegetarian first. Do you want to try some? This is vegan, bro. Do you hear about the Wingfest in Derby? You're going to eat 60,000 wings in two days. 30,000 birds. So we're showing people that takes better than chicken. Does it? Yeah. VFC. It's good. VFC is like an, it's like a, they're an activist brand. They're trying to save chickens, actually, this brand. It's all UK footage. You go into any UK chicken farm and you'll see this stuff. We just ask people to stop giving them the money, you know what I mean. But it's not just chicken industry, though. It's also the eggs and the milk and... I think he used to work in a sausage place and he won't eat them anymore. Yes. Every time they went and bought chicken they're not going to really want to consume it. Like all those people at the Wingfest, they just see food but they don't, no one's really connected to this. Do you want some? What do you got? Popcorn chicken. Does it certainly know does it taste like chicken? They're all right. They're all right? Yeah. Can't tell the difference, hey. I was just showing an old mate here like, this is footage from inside UK chicken farms and that. That's a good truck. Yeah. Snapping their necks. Snapping his neck. Yeah. Vegan fried chicken. Yeah. Vegan fried chicken. No tortured animals in there either. No, which is good. So basically these are Frankenstein chickens. They've selectly bred them to grow really fast real quick. They can't sustain like hold their body weight up that's why you see them all collapse on the floor. But yeah, in about a month, six weeks they'll be ready for slaughter. It's just, it's disgusting, man.  Like I always say to people would you pay me to abuse a chicken right now? No. And then people will be like, no. But they're basically doing that, aren't they? I used to work in a chicken factory years ago. Yeah. When you start thinking of animals and chickens, like most people aren't thinking about the welfare of a chicken.  Because if you care about the rights of like the little beings that are more insignificant in most people's eyes beings, you're more likely to be a better human across the board, I think. I chose I did a bit of time in jail. You were in prison where? Yeah. Well, I went vegan after I got out. I did about six months for a gun, actually. Like being vegan and being sober were two of the biggest things that changed my entire outlook on everything. Being a vegan is like learning to sort of control over yourself, isn't it? Yeah. But for for reasons outside yourself. Yeah. You do many things, right? Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'm always out all the time. You definitely need any volunteers maybe. Because the church needs me to stop doing stuff. Bro, I think it's a good thing for you, man. Like this here keeps me focused and it gives you a purpose. If you don't have that, I think like it's so easy to go off track. Swear on my mum's life this is the first time I've ever eaten vegan food. Is it really? Have you tried the popcorn chicken? Try the little ones. Are you allowed to say popcorn chicken? Yeah. Even though it's not chicken? No. Joe, I... Because I've spelt it like chai can. Do you like the chai can? For chai can, it's not bad, man. I can't tell it's not chai can. Yeah, it's nice. Yeah? It ain't bad, man. Vegan. Yes, it's vegan. It tastes like normal chicken. Really nice.  Yeah. What is it? It's vegan popcorn. I know you're vegan. Why not? What's the matter with vegan?   What is that? This is vegan chicken. Oh, no. Why not?  I don't eat vegan. Why not?  Oh, don't tell me you can still get them. Come have a look. I don't want to know. Go on, man. Go on. What do you think? Oh, bangin'. It's bangin'. You like it? It's good, good, good. This is a chicken industry in the UK. And what do you sell in chicken? No, this is vegan chicken. I'm giving out I went there. Did you? But this is my response to the Wing Fest. Oh, do you don't like the Wing Fest? This is what I think of it. This is a chicken farm in the UK. I'm just showing people like where the chicken comes from. Because people are disconnected from the food, aren't they? They just eat the meat and they don't see. Yeah. But most people are against animal cruelty. Do you want some alternative? To live vegan. These chickens done nothing to no one, though, did they? No. And they're being tortured and mass killed. And they always say the UK has the highest welfare standards in the world. Come out for a nice night. No, you can press me now. No, you can press me now. The reason I talk to consumers is because without you, they stop doing this. All your money that goes into this, you're basically donating your money to the cruelty. It's what you've been indoctrinated into. You don't see animals be slaughtered every day, though, do you? I've killed a sheep. You've killed a sheep? How'd you feel about it? I won't know. I feel bad about it. I wasn't that bothered by it. You weren't that bothered by it? I was distressed. But how do you think the sheep felt about it? I'd have done this before. And I was watching the ones so he dragged one out and killed the sheep. I was watching them. And then these were me. The dogs all the time. Yeah, I missed me. They didn't look scared or anything. Oh, really? That's the sheep though. I've seen terrified sheep in slaughterhouses before. Maybe they trusted their owner. Maybe they trusted him more. Was there lots of blood? We go, yeah. Did you feel like eating lamb straight after? You have to eat lamb, that isn't for dogs to eat.  I always like to ask people this question. Would you have a moral problem with eating a dog like an ethical issue with it? I know why.  What do you think about the Halau? I'm opposed to Halau slaughter and Western slaughter as well. I've been in the Halau slaughterhouse in Bali and I watched a cow get decapitated and they were vomiting through the hole in their neck, trying to breathe through the hole in their neck. I went to a family run slaughterhouse that was owned by a grandma and it was not much different. We left the camera pointing down to the knockbox.   When he decapitated the cow, he threw the head across the floor. That's how the cow was treated inside of a family run slaughterhouse in the UK. One where only local animals were going. This was supposed to be like the best of the best. When you see inside of the actually see inside of these slaughterhouses it's a lot different to like what your mind might think about it like to show you. It's really cool. I almost don't want to see it. Of course not. Because that's going to make you feel when I first saw it I was like don't you're going to ruin my dinner? Yeah, that's what I think. Yeah, like I've eaten this way for so long. Made out of plums. Genuine. I'll try it. Tell me what you think. Made out of plums. Okay. Alright, thank you. 10 out of 10. 10 out of 10. Oh, that's a really nice one. Vegan fried chicken. VFC. VFCs. It's really nice. It actually just tastes like chicken. Honestly, that tastes amazing. What do you think of this? What do you think of this? Don't watch the video. I filmed this birdie. I filmed her eyes. Look, she's got blue eyes. Stop it. They're going to a gas chamber these birds. You might as well just have vegan. Exactly. How is that justified for like a sandwich? Like what we do to these little birds? I would like to buy that now. I would buy that. It's my friend's brand, but we just want people to go like stop harming the animals and like that's why we live vegan. When you see that, you hated it, right?  But it's just in your actions, you're not. That's it, yeah.  And you've been brought up like that as well. What do you think? It's so good. So it's not worth it to kill chickens, is it? When we have that? Of course. Look at these little birds. Look how cute that. This is what they do in the UK to bird chickens. What's going on, brother? Cheers, brother. Hey, brother. How are you? I've been vegan for nearly nine years.  How old are you? I'm 25. 25. I stopped eating meat when I got out of prison in 2013. I have seen the **** baseball. I told you. That's what I was saying in baseball. Are you going to go? Good meeting you, mate. Take care. Go vegan Tell me an email about it. It's the UK chicken industry. What do you think about it? They're just dropping dead chicks out the side of the shed there. That's what happens to little birds. They're only about just over a month when they kill them, so they're still like little babies, but because they grow so big so quickly, they're in overgrown bodies.  This is deformity. When you're not vegan right, you're giving your money to these people to abuse and kill these animals. That's why I live vegan. I don't want to fund that. So you could give me 10 bucks right now.   These birds here are going into a gas chamber just in the UK here. Did they get hurt when you get gas? Well, they die. Yeah. And I think they do suffer when they're getting gas. Yeah, because you're removing the oxygen from them. There's always like vegan options at these places that you can try, and this is a good app. Happy cow. I'll take that, yeah. And here's some information as well, but they give you a free vegan challenge. It's all free, like if you've got Facebook. Vegan on a budget, it's pretty easy too, like I used to do vegan on a budget. As long as you know what to eat and that there's actually a lot more variety than you realize, really in the UK, there's heaps of really good stuff. I went over to Scotland, and I got a job in the chicken factory I was there about 40 minutes. And what they were doing, they come along on a line and it's a stunnance at the road. Yeah. Oh my God. Horrible. Yeah. Straight away. If people had to experience what these birds have to experience, then maybe they'd think twice about putting them through it, you know. What is it? It's vegan chicken. Oh no. Vegan fried chicken. Go on, try it. Tell me what you think. We don't want to torture the chicken. Well, this is vegan, so this is guilt-free. No one got killed for this. Should we have coffee? You can, of course you can. No animals slaughtered. This is a... There we go. Wow. Do you know what it is? I love it. They're trying to save as many chickens as possible. I love chicken. None of this. They're beautiful little birds, aren't they? Yeah, they are. This is what happens to them in the UK. Yeah, I love chicken. It should be a vegan. No, I can't. It should be a vegan. I love cheese. I thought you saw me there. Vegan cheese. We'll make our choice one day. Yeah. I hope you do, because your choice has always affected others, you know what I mean? I want loads of chicken. Yeah. I want loads of chicken. Start by stop eating them like that would be the first step. And then you can start by looking after them, like rescue them. This is vegan chicken. Maybe you'll like it. Is it good? You'll like it? Yeah. It's alright? No animals harmed. It's vegan fried chicken. No. That is nice. Is it not? Oh my God.  Show this. It's absolutely beautiful. It's very good. Made out of plants. There you go, right? Nice, isn't it? Yeah. There you go. Not there though. I'm involved. Handing out VFC after the Derby Wing Fest. We showed the Derby public whose wing they were eating. I think the reception was quite good. Everyone loved the VFC, which is always a winner. Leave the chickens alone and live vegan.


This is for one game not the total session. So what's the highest total you think I'll have for a game today? You think I could hit a 2,000? I'm just gonna go with that one Stretch out that jawline courage. Oh He's landed here Guys smashed on the roof and you guys compete this year in this top right window. Yep. I see him. I see him Oh, we got a hundred dollar credits to give the champs We just need some fan dual user names to pick from yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah


Hey everyone, welcome to another video lesson from navigation trading in this video I want to talk to you about the difference between a short strangle and an iron condor and The question that we get a lot from our members is when do I trade the short strangle and when do I trade the iron? Condor because they are very similar trades and that's what I want to break down And so let's start with a little bit of a comparison and then we'll jump on to the trading platform and show some actual examples So to start with when we put on either a short strangle or an iron condor We do both in a market neutral fashion meaning we don't care if the underlying stock goes up or down We just want it to stay in a specific range. So that's the same for both Also when we enter these we're entering with high implied volatility. So we want to sell a short strangle We want to sell an iron condor when implied volatility is high So that's the same for both Now is where we get into some of the differences first off the risk in a short strangle. The risk is undefined We're using naked options, which sometimes can make people nervous But I'll show you what the difference is and why that's important and then with an iron condor The risk is defined. So, you know exactly what you're risking on the trade when you enter it Next is the probability of profit when you enter a short strangle based on the way that we teach in our courses The probability of profit is typically around 70 percent or higher with a short strangle Where the probability of profit is a little bit lower with the iron condor at about 60 percent So you have a higher chance of making money with a strangle then you do an iron condor Next is the profit potential when you sell a strangle typically you're collecting more credit Giving you a higher profit potential with an iron condor. You're collecting less credit. So your profit potential is a little bit lower As far as where you can trade short strangles traditionally have been Uneligible for IRAs however tasty works has come out with the ability to trade naked Positions in your IRA. So if you do have tasty works as your broker and they are one of our preferred brokers Then you can trade them in an IRA and then iron condors for the most part across any broker can be traded in an IRA Next is our permission levels So when you apply for an account and you open an account at a brokerage You have to get permission to trade certain levels with a short strangle You have to have what's called tier three permissions to trade naked options and with iron condors You just have to have tier two permissions so that you can trade to find risk spreads And lastly with short strangles gonna use a larger amount of capital Whereas with an iron condor you can place smaller trades that use less capital So those are some of the differences. Let's go to the platform and tie this all together to make sure it makes sense So I'm gonna look at two different underlying symbols The first one we're looking at is SPX and if you're in thinkorswim platform We like to use our analyze tab because I'm a very visual person and I know a lot of our members are as well So it helps kind of introduce the concepts and helps you grasp the concepts a little better So what I've done here is I have put together a short strangle to begin with and you can see down here I've checked on just the short strangle box So that's what we're looking at if you look at the break-evens We put on the price slices at the break-even point of the zero line We'll see is that in this case the probability of profit if you held it all the way to expiration is a little over 63% so it's a little lower than the 70% that we talked about but what I want you to take away from this is that you've got a profit potential with one contract of $2,660 which you can see in the teal colored in the little black box over here to the left So remember that number twenty six sixty. That's our max profit now if we uncheck the strangle box And we check the iron condor now you'll see what happens a couple things one We've got defined risk. You can see these wings on either side I mean if price explodes to the upside or crashes to the downside we have this defined risk amount The profit potential as you can see if you're still looking at that teal number down in the bottom left is $735 so our profit potential is less than a third That of a strangle so our profit potential is lower But what we get in return is that defined risk So if you're nervous about undefined risk You can define the risk by just buying these wings and trading an iron condor The other thing I want to point out is look at our price slices their way out here However, we have to move them in to the breakeven points for the iron condor So let's just move those in and see what that does to the probabilities You can see that went from over 63% probability down to 55. Okay, so remember I told you you have a lower Probability of profit with an iron condor Whereas the short strangle has a higher probability and a higher profit potential, but you're looking at undefined risk so there's always a trade-off between risk and reward and it's not that there's one That's better than the other a short strangle is not better than an iron condor It's just dependent on what you are looking to trade from a capital usage from a defined risk The type of trading account you have and so forth The one last thing I want to show you on this example is if we right-click on the iron condor hit confirm and send It'll bring up this box showing what our buying power effect is So it's gonna cost us $2,269 of buying power to put on the iron condor trade So let's exit out of that and let's look at what the difference is with the short strangle So if we right-click hit confirm and send with one contract for a short strangle We would have to put up over $49,000 Okay, so I don't care if you're trading a six-figure or seven-figure account trading a short strangle in SPX Which is currently trading at nearly $2,900. It's just really not an efficient use of your capital So if you're trading extremely high priced underlying symbols like SPX Then you're typically gonna trade an iron condor You're gonna define the risk as well as it's just a more efficient use of your capital So those are the different things you look at the price of the symbol your trading permissions the probability of profit your max potential Profit your defined versus undefined risk And those all are the things that you want to take into consideration when choosing which to trade Let's go to one more example and let's take a look at EWZ, which is the Brazilian ETF Now look at the difference in price of what these symbols are trading at SPX is trading at nearly 2900 at the time of this recording and EWZ is trading at a little over thirty two dollars a share. Okay, so that's a massive difference, right? So let's take a look at the analyze tab here and see what the difference is Let me change this to match up with our expiration date Which is 10-20 so we get some accurate readings So let's look at the iron condor first and what you'll see is that we've got a probability of profit of about 68% That's good. We've got our defined risk wings as you can see here So the max risk with one contract is just a hundred and thirty six dollars This can be done in really any size account small accounts large accounts. It doesn't matter and again We're just looking at one contract. So we've got a defined risk max loss of a hundred and thirty six a Max potential profit of sixty four dollars Okay, so the lower the price the symbol the less capital you're gonna use and the lower Potential profit you're gonna have as well Now let's look at the short strangle So if we click on that what you'll see is our break evens have widened out So we need to move our price slices to get an accurate reading here and Move it over here and then what you'll see is now look at our probability of profit It jumped up to seventy four percent. So remember on a short strangle You have a higher probability of profit and now look at our max profit potential with the teal number down here in the box Is a hundred and thirty dollars. So now we have a much higher Profit potential about three times the credit about three times the profit potential With the short strangle versus the iron condor and of course with that comes undefined risk Which if you've taken our courses, you know that there are ways to mitigate that risk and minimize that risk Even when you're trading undefined strategies Okay, so lastly, let's do the same thing as we did with SPX Let's go down and take a look at what the buying power would be let's start with the short strangle We can right-click hit confirm and send and you'll see for even for a short strangle with undefined risk The buying power effect the amount of capital it takes to put this trade on is a little over 326 dollars. Okay, so not not too bad Now of course if we go to the iron condor, it's gonna be even less hit confirm and send and the buying power It takes is a hundred sixty one dollars and fifty cents. Okay, so you can see the difference Between the two there's not a right way or a wrong way to do this The only thing you got to make sure is it an efficient use of capital Are you collecting amount of credit that you want to trade? So for example, one of the things that we shy away from is trading iron condors on these low price symbols Because if you look I mean the max profit we can make with this on one contract is 64 bucks Remember with an iron condor it's four different legs. You've got four different options You're trading so you got to pay commissions on each one of those as well So it's a little bit higher transaction cost whereas a strangle is only two contracts So you're paying less transaction costs entering the trade and exiting the trade So you want to take that into consideration and understand if you're gonna trade an iron condor Just make sure the amount of credit you're receiving is worth the risk and the transaction costs involved with the trade So those are kind of two different extreme examples one of a very high priced symbol at twenty nine hundred dollars I wanted a very low price symbol at thirty two dollars and the difference between the two So let's go back to the slides and recap this one more time and Kind of give you some takeaways give you your decision-making criteria for choosing a short strangle versus an iron condor one Do you prefer to find or undefined risk? Are you okay with that unlimited risk component or are you more comfortable with the find risk? If you're more comfortable with the find risk you want to go with the iron condor with undefined risk You want to go with the short strangle. Is it the best use of capital? So if you're trading a high-priced underlying like SPX or Amazon or something that's that's a very high price You're probably gonna use an iron condor because it's just a better use of capital But on some of these lower price symbols You may opt to use a short strangle because you're not using too much buying power and you're getting a better credit So the symbol price comes into that account as well And lastly, what type of account are you trading? Do you have the capability to trade undefined risk if you're in an IRA versus a margin account? If you're in an IRA a lot of times most brokers only allow you to trade iron condors and you can't trade Undefined risk or short strangle so depends on your account type as well So that's it. I hope that was helpful in helping you determine Which is better for you a short strangle or an iron condor talk to you in the next lesson


A subject heading is a word or phrase that is assigned to an article or other resource and describes the topic of the resource. It's a bit like a social media hashtag, but without the hash symbol. You might be thinking, isn't that a keyword? Subject headings and keywords are both types of terms you use to search, but there's a difference. Keywords are the words you choose that describe the key ideas you're searching for. Subject headings use a controlled vocabulary, meaning there's a list of possible headings and the relevant subject headings are assigned to each article. A single article might have multiple subject headings, especially if it covers a range of topics. Searching by subject heading is more powerful than searching by keyword. Here's why. When you search by keyword, that word might show up in a number of places in relation to the article, such as the abstract, the author's name, the journal's title, and other fields, even if it's not specifically what the article is about. This means your search results may include many articles that are not relevant to you when you search by keyword. When you search by subject heading, you're limiting your results to articles that are actually about that topic. Keep in mind that not every concept has a subject heading, so in some cases you won't be able to find a subject heading that means exactly what you're looking for. Rather than trying to convert every keyword into a subject heading, it's often best to use a combination of keywords and subject headings when searching. Subject headings are also useful because they are arranged in the hierarchy of broader and narrower terms. This is sometimes called a tree structure because the narrower terms branch out from the broader terms. Searching the tree may give you ideas for search terms you hadn't considered. For example, if you search nurse-patient ratio as a subject heading and don't find many results, you could find the broader term, personnel staffing and scheduling, and try that one instead. Part of that tree would look like this in the CINNL database. Different databases use different subject heading systems. For example, CINNL uses CINNL subject headings, while a lot of other databases, such as PubMed, Medline and Cochrane, use a system called Mesh. This means you'll need to look up your subject headings in each database you use. We hope this helps. Thanks for watching.