Hey, this is Brett and this 2017 Ford F350 Crew Cab Longbox Dual-Roo Wheel Lariat is stock number 13300Z. I am here at Summit Automotive in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin, your new and used heavy-duty truck headquarters. This 2017 Ford F350 has the 6.7-liter Powerstroke diesel engine. This truck has been fully-safetyed and inspected by our service shop. It has a fresh oil and filter change, all the fluids have been checked and topped off. And this truck is 100% ready to go. I'm going to go all the way around in this video, inside, underneath, start it up, take a look under the hood, and give you the most accurate representation of the vehicle as possible. White platinum tricote metallic color, and I shoot all my videos in 4K, so if you have HD capabilities on your computer, tablet, smartphone, or television, I highly recommend turning them on now, because it is your best way to check out the quality condition options, and of course, cleanliness of the vehicle before seeing it in person. Very clean down this side, the box looks really good on this truck. The doors are in really nice shape, as is the cab. It does have the PowerScope mirrors, I'll show you those in just a second. Another side front fender looks really good, and if you like the video, you can subscribe to my YouTube channel, which is youtube.com slash Summit Auto. Click the bell notifications, you'll get updates on the videos I do each and every day here at Summit Auto. One of this one comes with the 17 inch polished aluminum rims, and it has Michelin LTX-AT tires. These are LT245-75R17s, and I would say they have probably about 60% of the tread left on them in the front here. Look at how clean that frame and underbody is. Every little corrosion under there. Front fender, once again, very nice condition. Headlight lenses are nice and clear, and it does come with the factory fog lights. Front bumper and lower valance are in excellent shape. No major dents or dings on there, comes with the chrome trimmed grille. And the hood is in fantastic condition as well. You do get the cab lights up top, and the passenger side front fender is very nice too. Another side front rim, no scuffs or scrapes on there. And as you go down this side of this 2017 Ford F350, take note of how clean that body is, how reflective and mirror-like the paint is. I take these HD videos, so if you are far away or even if you're close by and you just cannot make the trip down, but you're still interested in purchasing the vehicle, you can see the truck, hear the truck, and have confidence in the vehicle you're looking at before you even get here. So when you do get here, there's absolutely no surprises, and you can make a smart and informed buying decision from wherever you're at. If this video helps you make that buying decision, let your salesmen know that you saw the video, that it was helpful. And that Brett sent you. You get the three rock guards on the tub there. Back rim is in excellent shape too, and the back tires have just as much tread as the front tires. You do get the camper package with this truck, with the anti-sway bars there, and underbody all the way underneath looks really, really good. It's like that all the way, as all the remaining factory exhaust, lower rockers and cab corners look good, and it comes with the nice factory chrome step bars, which are in very nice condition as well. You do get the chrome-tipped exhaust. That looks good too. Coming around to the back, rear bumper is in nice shape, back up parking sensors, full towing package, which includes a receiver hitch for pin-and-7 pin wiring, and the tailgate is in very nice condition as well. Has an access soft tonneau cover that rolls up. Comes with a spray-in bed liner, gooseneck hitch, and this is a linex spray-in bed liner. I have linex on my truck, I love it, and it comes with a tailgate ladder step there as well. You can see that bed liner goes onto the tailgate. Press to this side for full disclosure, this back room is in excellent shape as well. This truck does have the driver side door code entry. We do have the code for this truck, and if you ever want to figure out what your code is for your 17 to 22 super-duty, I have a video in the upper right-hand part of screen showing you how to do that. Heated mirrors, built-in directional signals, these power fold-in, power telescope out. I'll show you that as well in just a minute. This one comes with the lariat package, gives you the black leather bucket seats in the front. No rips or tears, very nice and clean. It does have a set of weather tech floor mats in here. Auto headlamps, tilt, telescopic steering wheel, power windows, power locks, power mirrors, wood grain trim on the doors. Power has to be on for those to work, so I'll show you that in just a second. Back seats are just as clean as the front seats. No rips or tears back here, and it does have the latch child safety system for any child car seats you may have. Power sliding rear window with the built-in rear defrost. These seats fold up. There is a load floor under a collapsible storage area back here, and that goes up. You can lock that into place. There's your ball for your gooseneck hitch, receiver hitch reducer, box tie-downs, weather tech floor mat back here. You get 110 volt, 400 watt plug-in, two USBs, and then a 12 volt power point there as well. These seats come down just like so, and you get the child safety locks on the back doors, and the bottoms of the doors all look really good. We'll hop inside, check out the miles, the radio, and everything that this truck has to offer on the interior. Get the built-forward tough animation there. You can see that this one has 48,769 miles on it. Instrument cluster is very nice and clean. You do get the digital speedometer, compass display, and that big digital display there as well. Leather-wrapped steering wheel, cruise controls and information center controls on the left. Bluetooth and audio controls on the right. This one has the six-speed automatic transmission with the optional tap shift. This one has the sync eight-inch radio. It does have the factory navigation system on it. There's highway 41, so you can see that that is working nicely. You get AM, FM, and serious satellite radio as well as a CD player. You have all your different settings on here, including Apple Car Plan, Android Auto, where you can project your cell phone to the screen, so that's a pretty sweet system as well. I told you I'd show you these mirrors, so they power fold in like so. They power fold out like that, and then they power scope out and in. Once again, both sides and in. Backup camera shows up right there. You get a factory exhaust brake stability control. This one does have the Sony premium sound system.  You get four cupholders or two cupholders. It's kind of my magic trick there. 12-volt powerpoint, 110-volt, 400-watt plug-in, and then dual glove boxes passing your side format and seat are in excellent condition. And once again, that headliner is very nice and clean. You do get map lights up here and power sliding rear window button. We'll start it up. Take a look under the hood. Starts right up. No check engine lights or anything like that, other than telling me my door and my hood are open. I did want to show you the tire and loading information real quick, as well as the VIN sticker. All right. I would personally like to thank you for checking out the video today, and hopefully from this HD video, you have been able to verify the quality and condition of this truck all the way around inside and out. Under the hood, we have the 6.7-liter power stroke diesel engine. Engine base is very clean, runs very smooth. Once again, this truck has been fully safety and inspected by our service shop as a fresh oil and filter change. All the fluids have been checked and topped off, and this truck is 100% ready to go. There is your emissions sticker. And I would highly recommend this truck to make quality and condition standpoint, and to see more pictures of this truck, or one of our other 550 new news cars, trucks, SCVs, minivans, ringlers, halftons, three-quarter tons, one tons, you name it. We've got to go to that website right there, summitauto.com. Full pictures and descriptions of every single vehicle from two locations all at summitauto.com. If you'd like to check out more HD videos, you can go to youtube.com slash summitauto. Remember to like, subscribe, and share on this video and all the videos that you see there. Click the bell notification so you'll get updates on the videos I do each and every day here at summitauto.com. In fact, in a second, you will see a link to subscribe to my YouTube channel on the upper left. The link to more F-350 videos I've done in the upper right. Link to this vehicle on our website in the lower left, and a link to one of our latest YouTube videos on the lower right. Click those, check us out. We're super excited to help you with this Ultra Clean 2017 Ford F-350 Crew Cab Longbox, Dually, Lariat, and White Platinum Tri-Coat Metallic. Thanks again for checking out the video. Remember to like, subscribe, and share on the YouTube channel. I really appreciate it. Thanks again.


On behalf of the 900 crew members, embark the board, the USNS Comfort, thank you for welcoming us to Pai Tapehru. It is my great honor to be here with USNS Comfort as part of Enduring Promise 2018. I am Captain William Shafley, the mission commander for the 2018 Comfort Deployment. Our mission is to promote peace, security, and stability in the Americas through strengthening our partnerships with the nations of Central and South America. Through providing medical assistance, we are demonstrating to the people of Peru our support and commitment. This is Comfort's third visit to Peru and her sixth mission to South and Central America. As you can see, the sea has brought us together. We are successful in cooperation together. Our medical team aboard Comfort will work alongside the government and military of Peru to provide top quality medical care to all patients in need. Our mission is one of commitment and a demonstration of the powerful cooperation between our two countries. On behalf of the entire Comfort mission crew, we thank you for the warm welcome and we look forward to the week ahead here in Pai Tapehru.


We have a very special guest today on One Take, he's a filmmaker and someone who has worn many hats in the filmmaking world. He wrote Pandorum and more recently he wrote and directed Infinity Chamber, a movie I highly recommend. It's a fantastic psychological sci-fi thriller and people who watch this channel know that I love sci-fi, especially when it can successfully blend a sense of discovery with some thought provoking questions and an emotional human core at the center of it. Writer-director Travis Malloy did exactly that with Infinity Chamber and I'm excited to talk with him today, so Travis, welcome to the show. Thanks, thanks so much, thanks for having me, I appreciate it. Definitely, and I feel like most conversations now kind of start a similar way where you have to ask how are you, how are you doing with COVID, the lockdowns, have you found a way to maintain your sanity in some kind of a schedule? Yeah, absolutely, I appreciate it.  So trying to get as much work done as I can and we're really trying to figure out how to approach kind of this new era of filmmaking, how we can do it safely. So we're all kind of scrambling to try to figure that out. And actually speaking of writing, that was one of the things I wanted to ask you about.  And I'm curious, that was a couple years back, has your writing process, do you have a preferred method for writing or does it sort of differ from one project to the next? It does differ, but that did change the whole way that I write. Before, long story short, I was working as a writer in L.A. and working on lots of projects, but I was having a tough time and I always did the traditional route where I would do an outline and break it down. And then just kind of out of irritation, I said, you know what? I'm just going to try this a different method. I'm going to try to write a movie as a viewer. As it goes along, I have no idea where it's going. And it's kind of a dangerous way to write because you can easily paint yourself into a corner. But it worked. And that's now, basically that's what I do now. The problem, it's great because you can come up with some really incredible things, but the downside is I have dozens and dozens of scripts that stopped halfway through because I ran into a wall and I didn't know how to finish them. But yeah, I considered a very organic approach, it's kind of a dangerous way to write, but I like to just jump in as if I'm watching the movie and just see where it goes. It actually reminds me, I might be misattributing this quote, but it might have been Jim Davis, the author of Garfield. And I think he talked about the fact that at a certain point, he gets to know his characters so well that he'll sort of just sit there and watch it play out. And then when something funny happens, he writes it down. So it sounds like you have sort of a similar approach. Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I think it's really about finding the voice for the characters and setting up a scenario and then it does, there's this weird feeling where they kind of take over where you're just watching from the sidelines. So it's kind of rare when that happens, but when it does, it's really magical, it's really great. Yeah, and I wanted to ask, so I mentioned in the introduction, I said you wore a lot of hats in the filmmaking world. And I think I read in an interview about how you got started. You did a lot of different things. I would love to hear a little bit about your story of just how you got into the world of filmmaking. What drew you in and how did you get started? Oh, right on. Well, you know, I grew up in Minnesota. I went to college in Minneapolis and I worked for Prince out at Paisley Park. And I really just kind of dove into the industry. I tried to do all any department working with art department or as a PA, as a camera and stunts and special effects. And I basically just tried to gobble up everything that I could find. My first film, I did an indie film with my friends, very low budget. I came out to Hollywood. We sold the film and then I met a big agent and he actually, I wanted to be a director and he said, no, I'm not going to represent you as a director. I'll represent you as a writer. And I was like, well, I'm not really a writer. That's, you know, I didn't consider that path. But he said, no, that's I like what you I like what you've written. So he kind of pulled me in that direction. So that kind of became my career and found out I had a little bit of a knack for it. So I kind of fell into it by accident. Gotcha. And you actually mentioned something I wanted to ask about just when I was looking at your credits. I saw those stunt credits. What kind of stunt work were you doing early on? Yeah, that was that. That was just kind of young and dumb, fun times. I work. It was a career I realized I did not want to do, you know, once I got it, it was it was fun when you're young and doing stunts and car gags and high falls and fire stuff and all it was just it was a lot of fun to do. But I quickly realized I wanted to be behind camera that that was a rough. That was a rough way to make a living, but but but it was fun. I kind of scratched that edge, did some like bridge jumps and just kind of foolish stuff when I was younger. But I right, right. I quickly veered out of that into the more creative into the writing and the directing aspect. Right.  Yeah, exactly. But I got it out of my system, you know, right, right. I did enough to have some fun, but but then got into different aspects of production. And is directing still the part you enjoy most? So, no, you've you've done a lot of writing, it sounds like. So have you grown to appreciate the writing more than you did, kind of at the beginning of it all? Yeah, you know, I mean, it's it's definitely actually, you know, writing is is really the thing that I'm drawn to just because directing is very rare. It's very, you know, it's a very it's a very special gift to get the opportunity to direct a film. It's a really tough industry. So that comes along every once in a while in a blue moon, you know. So the writing I'm really drawn to is trying to tell a compelling story, trying to work within interesting guidelines. You know, a lot of time I compare like novelists to screenwriters. I can't imagine writing a novel because you can go anywhere. You can express any thought, et cetera, et cetera. But screenwriting is very restrictive. You have to tell a compelling. You can't convey thought. You have to just show a blueprint of what you see and what people say. And it has to be within, you know, one hundred and five pages and a three X structure and stuff like that. So I really like being forced to try to tell something compelling under those restrictions. I find it I find it an interesting challenge. And now in this era of doing very self-contained movies, low budget films that are easy to do with low number of characters, I really like that challenge of trying to to do something with very little resources. Right. And I think that's a really good segue to talk about Infinity Chamber. I was reading a little bit about you said something about how you can wait until you have the right budget or you can wait for the opportunity to direct. But you sort of decided I'm going to do it. I'm going to make Infinity Chamber no matter what it takes. And I would love just for the jolt of motivation I'll get from hearing it and other people will get. I'd love to hear a little bit about how you decided it's time to make this movie and how you got it done. Yeah, no, that's that's that's that's an interesting part of it.  You put your life on hold. You put a lot of energy into something like that. So it's really easy to procrastinate. It's like, oh, when the kids are out of school or when I have more money or in the summer or whatever. So it's so easy to procrastinate. So I and I knew that. So I was like, all right, I'm going to force my own hand. And I decided I rented a little storage space and I started building the set for the movie. And I didn't even have a finished script. But I just knew that if I started and I was spending money to rent this space and putting this energy into the project, I'd be a fool not to make the movie after a few months or six months or whatever. So that was I just made that decision and kind of took that leap of faith. It took me a year to build that set. And I was writing the script while I was doing it. And it was really interesting to be in that place, building it myself and then thinking about that story and carving it out to make it fit what I was doing. So anyway, that's that is how it worked. And it was kind of like stone soup because people were coming to see what I was doing and thinking I was foolish. Like, well, what are you doing? You know, wait a minute, what are you doing? Because normally the traditional way is, all right, here's my script, here's my project. Now I have to go present it to financiers and go through the traditional route. But I kind of reverse engineered it. It's like, no, I'm just I'm just going to start making a movie. I had no money, I had no cast and no crew, whatever. But slowly people were very interested in what I was doing.  It's got to be pretty helpful, too, to be able to work on the script while sitting in the physical space where the movie is actually going to take place. That's got to be a unique experience. Yeah, absolutely. It's funny because in Infinity Chamber, I believe he spends two years in the cell in the story. And I realize that I spent about as much time in that space as the character did in the movie. So yeah, it was it was very, very surreal experience. Yeah, that's great. That's great. It's probably unfortunately a method of writing. It's probably not something you can replicate over and over. You know, James Cameron creating Pandora for Avatar. Live there for a while and then write the script. Right. Yeah, exactly. Exactly. It was it was it was, you know, I mean, not to get nutty, but it felt like I earned the movie because I built that place myself.  And I like I dumpster dived and I looked and tried to find all these items. And but by the time the set was complete and we were filming, I really felt like I earned it. That's not like, you know, we use some money and we hired some crew to go build it. And then, all right, let's roll in and make this movie. I just felt I felt part of that place. Yeah. And it definitely showed on screen. And you know, you refer to the fact that there's the movie mostly takes place in the one location. But it doesn't feel like a small movie. It feels like there's a whole world around it. You there's there's references to this sort of dystopian government that's taken over and it sort of feels like a bigger movie, a bigger world that we're seeing this kind of slice of. Yeah, absolutely. You know, I knew that that was the challenge. One of the was OK, how to tell it an interesting story under those guidelines. But I knew I needed to break out of that room. So we wouldn't be that class republic. So to me, it's a very, very small movie in disguise. I was able to write the story that, you know, with the device that took him to the flashback to his apartment, to the coffee shop, the escape sequences, like I could do these grand breaths of fresh air to get out of the to break out of that room. But really, when you break it down, majority of that movie is one guy in this small room talking to a device. So it was my way of disguising, trying to make a bigger movie out of something very small. And is that how the. So one thing I wanted to ask about was the the mechanic you just mentioned of him sort of reliving that memory and those memories over and over. You know, I know you talked a little bit in some other interviews about the inception of the idea for this movie, where I think you read an article about automation coming into prisons. But I'm curious, when did the mechanic of the diving back into his memories and reliving them, where when did that idea come to you as part of the story? You know, it was interesting. It was it was kind of twofold. One, one, I like the Groundhog Day aspect of it because I could get a lot of bang for my buck. Shooting the same sequence over and over and over gave me a lot of footage to work with without moving locations. And she I'm taking down tips. Yeah, it was a little bit of a cheat. Like, wow, if I'm doing a Groundhog Day thing, then him getting up in the morning and going to the coffee shop. I'm using that sequence over and over and over. Well, I don't have to do a new set of new cameras set up and I have to do a location change so I can get a lot out of that. That was one just technical aspect. But the other aspect was him struggling with this very interesting dilemma of being stuck in his own his own slice of memory. I just thought that was that would be a very easy dilemma to pull off, technically, but an interesting psychological battle. Right. Yeah. And I thought it worked really well. It's as the movie starts, no part of me expected that a sort of love story would play into this at all. But it kind of sneaks up on you. And that's what I was trying to say earlier in my favorite sometimes with sci-fi. It's easy to get stuck on the concept and focused on that. But the best movies are the ones that have that emotional core. So you're actually invested in the character. And I thought it worked really well here. Oh, thanks, man. Thanks. I really appreciate it.  It was interesting because it started out as primarily an escape movie. It's a guy trying to get out of a room. And that really where it starts. But then as we're as we were, even while we were shooting the film, then these other elements started to seep in. Like that's really interesting, this relationship that he has. And and I always thought it was sometimes you don't know the theme of your movie. Even when you're going in, it's great if you do. But I didn't really know the theme of this movie. And as soon as he started communicating, as soon as he started talking to Howard and and we did the scenes with between him and Gabby, I was like, this is really a movie about relationships, about relationship, artificial relationships. Dealing with and and how we communicate with technology, with with texting and emailing and skyping and all this kind of stuff that our relationships are very filtered through technology. So I was like, he has these two artificial relationships that are very similar, but how he deals with them. He deals with them differently in order to get out of this limit. So anyway, it was it was an interesting. It was kind of an aha moment while shooting, like, wait a minute, there's something there's something more going on here than just an escape. Right. And that that theme was something I was thinking about after I watched the movie, because at least one of the takeaways that I that I took when after I watched it is Howard is someone that he's a purely artificial intelligence, gets kind of close to forming a real relationship with Frank. But at a certain point, you see the limitations of it when he starts to repeat over and over. Yes, Frank. Yes, Frank. But then you have this slightly more real relationship. It's still somebody that's in his own mind. Gabby filtered kind of through the machine. And that's where the relationship feels a little bit more real, almost to the point where if Frank had decided I'm going to stay here and just live inside my own mind, you could almost understand that decision. And I can relate both of those into into our world. It's like you mentioned before, I have those friends who will constantly be looking at their phone texting while I'm trying to have a conversation with them. And that feels like the Gabby side of it. They're talking to this person who's real, but filtered through technology. The Howard of it all feels like we haven't quite gotten there yet, where there is a machine that can completely fulfill your sort of social needs. But I have a feeling we'll get there eventually. I think you're right. Yeah, I think you're right. It was, you know, the other thing that was interesting was originally Gabby, she was trying to get the information out of him. And it was weird. It was interesting because while filming, I changed my mind. I was like, there's something I really like this relationship. And she really kind of serves us as alter ego. It's really in a way for him to talk to himself the way she challenges his decisions and questions him to me. It's more of an alter ego. But anyway, I just thought there was something really there was really something sweet about this this relationship. So I took out the part of her being a villain because it and I realized there was really no villain in the movie. The villain is is a little more obscure. It's the it's the the government. It's the the system, the, you know, that kind of thing. But I was like, I don't know, am I taking a chance? If I don't really have a clear cut antagonist to the story. But it was just the decision we made to try to go with it and see if it worked. But I just liked it a lot better that neither Howard or Gabby were villains in the story. They both wanted the same thing for him. Yeah, I think that I think that worked, especially if you think about, you know, I know some of this is me just adding my own thoughts to it. But if I draw a parallel to the real world, if computers, if you had the skynet of computers taking over one day, it might feel like there was no villain. You know, every human involved had the best intentions and the system kind of took on a life of its own. Right. Yeah. Absolutely. I wanted to ask about Howard because he quickly became one of my favorite artificial intelligence companions, just the perfect balance of being a little bit human, a little bit computer, had a slight little bit of sarcasm. So how did you get the Howard personality right? Did you know it going in? Did you kind of feel it out as you went along? That was tough.  So I wanted to play homage to that, but how to make him a little bit differently if he sounded too robotic or if he sounded too human. So it was it was interesting trying to find that balance. And honestly, I didn't know his voice when we shot it. I didn't know who I was going to use as the voice.  But I honestly didn't consider Jesse as the voice of Howard. And then in post, I had Jesse's recording. So I was using him to edit the film. And then we were auditioning voice actors and I listened to dozens and dozens of people. But I was so used to Jesse's voice, like that's that's how. So anyway, little did I know Howard was sitting next to me the whole time. But I thought that he there was something he did in his delivery that was kind of ominously artificial, but then moments of personality. I thought that was that added a nice charm, but it was also really creepy. Yeah, definitely. It added some humor at times to the movie that I wouldn't have expected going in. I watched it without my family and there were a few kind of laugh out loud moments with Howard that I thought worked really well. That's awesome. That's awesome. I had kind of one more question I wanted to ask you about Infinity Chamber, which is any time a movie ends with some ambiguity, it's always tempting to ask for the definitive explanation, which I won't do. But I was just curious how you decided to end on a slightly more open ended note where it could be read optimistically. It could be read pessimistically is kind of multiple reads. Did you know going in it was going to end on a little bit of an ambiguous note or was this again, something you felt out as you were making the movie? Yeah, no, for sure. It was it was definitely intentional. And I'll I'll be completely honest with you because that the people have asked me about that before.  But I wanted there to be two possible endings for the film and I wanted the audience to decide for themselves. I I I personally have a thought. I mean, there's really it's really kind of come down to two different scenarios that he actually did get out. He actually got that the society had changed and that he actually found the real girl who was that piece of memory that he'd been living with inside the cell. The other version is that a much darker one that he accepted his fate that he was never going to get out. He gave up the information to the computer that it was looking for and it rewarded him with this existence still inside the cell. But he was able to embrace this artificial character that he created. So there's two versions. But it was interesting because when I wrote what I wrote the script, I had two different groups of friends in my life. I have friends that love darker, more ominous type endings. And then I have friends and family that really don't like that.  So I really was trying. I was kind of being greedy and I was trying to appease both groups. And I really think that the movie is. Belongs to the audience. You know, how you react, how you feel about a movie belongs to belongs to you. So it's interesting when I watch the movie. I, whether I'm in a good mood or whatever, sometimes I'll go with that ending. Like that's yeah, that's that's how that works for me. And then sometimes like, no, I think this is the way it is. It's so it's I just tried to do something where the audience could have something to discuss at the end and decide for themselves what kind of ending they wanted. It's funny because when I look at some online discussions about the ending, I don't see a lot of here's what I think. I see a lot of definitive, you know, this is what happened because you can see these clues or this is what happened. So I think I thread the needle pretty well where you can you can walk away pretty confident in your read of that ending. And I was thinking about my read on it. And I think when I was younger, I probably would have been part of a group of friends you mentioned that are more pessimistic. I would have read it that way. Now I think I'm more optimistic. So I read it as a very positive ending. And I'm going to choose to live with that that interpretation. There you go. Well, and then my argument is that actually there is a positive side to both even that whether it's about finding inner peace, whether it's finding, you know, being able to to live your life on your own terms. So, you know, there's there's there's room to move there. But but yeah, I'm with you. It's been it's actually I never expected. I mean, this is a very little movie. We did I did not expect the reaction that it would have. I never expected and not the fans to discuss very heated debates about certain elements of it. So that's just been absolutely wonderful.  Movies are a long shot. Some some are quickly easily forgotten and never seen by the audience. But so I was really lucky to have to get get some that the film found its audience and found its path in a certain way. So that was that was awesome. And that's what makes my day as I is getting emails from people all around the world that just want to talk about the movie. I mean, that's you can't ask for anything better than that. That's awesome. And it's just awesome to hear how the movie came together.  Then as you start to make it, some of it is happenstance, what your limitations are, what you have to work with. Some of it is ideas that organically grew out of it. So it's just so cool to hear all those elements came together to form this awesome movie that hopefully we can get. I'll feel very happy with how this goes. If we can get in the comments on YouTube, it's a good argument going about that ending in a good heated debate. Yeah, that'd be great. Absolutely. Yeah, it was, you know what? It was it was a lot of people really gave sacrifice a lot. A lot of people worked really hard.  It's, you know, under a very limited budget, really kind of a garage band style film. So it was it was a really great journey. That's for sure. I'm really proud of it. Awesome. Well, thank you for sharing it with us. And I think one more question I wanted to ask is, as you go, hey, you're sorry about that. No, I thought that was me. I was like, oh, that is just like we talked about technology is already turning on us. There you go. There you go. All right, well, I pretty much just wanted to wrap up and I just wanted to thank you for coming on and just sharing that whole journey with us. Like I said, just hearing how the movie all came together is insightful and it's just motivating for me. And I think for others listening, it'll just be motivation to do that movie we've wanted to do or whatever we've had in mind for all for so long.  Yeah, absolutely.  I mean, there's there's just it hasn't been a time like this. The technology has gotten inexpensive and has gotten really powerful. I mean, you can make a movie with what you can put into a backpack. So it really it's about content.  It's going to come down to these smaller stories that have to go inward with story instead of outward with spectacle. So I just I'm really excited about the independent film world right now, and I just think there's going to be some great stuff. And it's a great time for for people who want to go make that make that movie. Now now's a great time to do it. So awesome. And actually, speaking of which, do you have any anything in the works that you're ready to talk about? Anything you can give us a little preview of what's next? You know, yeah, definitely. It's it's it's tough trying to figure out with the pandemic how we're going to proceed. But I definitely have I have a handful of projects that I'm pursuing. So we're just still trying to figure out which one makes sense and how we can do those things. But yeah, I can't nothing. Nothing I can give you specific about because I haven't really decided on which project we're going to pursue. But I've got a few scripts out there with other directors that are putting projects together and then some of my own little passion project. So definitely trying to get into production sometime in the next few months. Awesome. Well, I'm very excited to see whatever you do next. And maybe when the time is right, we can have you on again to talk about when your next projects. Absolutely, man, anytime. I appreciate it. It's great talking about the project. So thanks. Thanks a lot, man. I appreciate it. Awesome. Well, thank you for coming on and for anyone that's watched. If you haven't done it already, please check out Infinity Chamber. I personally watched it on Amazon Prime.  You can go watch it right now. So thank you again for joining Travis and hopefully we'll talk again soon. Excellent, man. Thanks so much.


Hi folks. I'm very excited to be here. I'm from Chennai. Who are from Chennai? Yeah. Is your hands? Hey. Okay. Not many. Okay. So this is my first view conference. Like I'm going to talk about view conference. So today we are going to see a board like using building form components, using UJS in a large scale application. So I am Bharat Vaj. I'm from I'm a friend and engineer at charge B. So a little bit about charge B. Charge B is a subscription management platform that helps you untangle recurring revenue business from negative building. So basically we take care of the subscription part of your application. So we are about like 9000 customers in 50 countries and we have a support more than 20 payment gets. So today's topic like we've been speaking about two things. Why a company like charge B charge B chose view as its view layer and we'll be talking about the forms. What are the problems we faced and how we solved it. We chose like there are multiple factors when we considered being like two years back we had option whether to choose react or angle or view. So those are the popular at the time so we were just bubbling up. There are like many factors we considered. One such factor is a fast learning curve. At the time we are like about 60 developers. Most of them were expert in Java and that extra was like Java Enterprise Edition with JSP for the front end. So we don't have any like expert in JavaScript expert in HTML CSS. So we are like traditional HTML developers and CSS developers. So we chose view because of that it's since it's easily approachable and it was easy to on board a new hire. So let's say a pressure joins a team and he was able to deliver within a day. So it doesn't take any steep learning curve. It's very easy to learn. And one more thing was like documentation part. So when you compare with angular or react so I would suggest like viewJS documentation is pretty clear and simple. So you can easily understand. So words new to the single page application can easily understand. So starting point to learn a single page application or just works versatile. Since I said our app is like a monolithic sound year old legacy application with a lot of edge cases and complex logic, building logic. And we want to choose a framework and we don't want to sit and like sit to sound months and revamping the entire product. We want to choose a framework or library that integrates the existing app and you're able to deliver within a month. So previously you're right. We are developing a complex you will animation with jquery or javascript or anything. It will take time. So charge is like a user experience focus company and we are like comp like user experience. We focus on user experience and we are like complex animation logic. So with viewJS we were able to deliver we were able to develop within a single day. Previously we were taking about three to four days to develop a animation. So it became very easy to develop because of the animation books the view provides. So end of the day as a business matter it is how fast you deliver it. These are the principles. So we choose because like the decoupled HTML, CSS, JS that comes out of the box of view. Since view is very flexible. So instead of writing in React and having a JSX so we add HTML and CSS developer who doesn't want to write CSS in JS so that's why we choose view. This was a major selling point to our investors and CTO. Single file components are the template part. It was very easy to debug and manage and maintain the application. And the final part was the dependency tracking system, the reactivity. So at the time since like view is not backed by any big product companies and there was many patterns at the time and it was just bubbling up. So charge bill allows philosophy. So what happens after two years even view drops a project and goes to another project. So since we went to the source code and we were able to understand easily how does a view works. So even if that stopped we were able to pick it up and then continue it. That's a major point for every enterprise company. So as community driven we have RFCs. So when compared to other frameworks, view is something like that is community driven. There is RFC once RFCs are approved by every most of developers once it gets upward and only then it will be moved to the version. We'll come into the performance. So you don't have to do anything like people the performance of the view. It comes after the box. When compared to React, we have to write in a such a way code like you optimize the code. So React doesn't do for it for you. So view does up to the box doesn't do it. So lesson says when compared to other frameworks. So in charge we have two applications. One is the web console as well as the checkout pages. So that the checkout page runs on third part of our customers end. So we want something that is lightweight. So we chose view. Finally it suits our need like we are using view for last two years and we didn't find any problem. Even if the problem comes, we were able to solve it using view. We were able to harness the power of view. So that's how view is flexible. So coming to today's topic, forms. Well, building forms that has more than 10 form fields and each form field has a relationship between other form fields and it's not just a form of text. Let's assume like we have currency input, time zone support. It's pretty hard to manage and maintain it and even write unique cases. Many of you know what we have. We have view just developer. He's the CEO of view just developer.com website and he's writing a book on and building enterprise application using view.js. So this is his read from him. So he says like building a very big forms using component based application library. Let's say even view, react or angular. It's very difficult to it's not maintainable. That's what he says. So this is like some normal form, average form in charge B. So this is not a norm generic form where you have a form builder and then not normal templates. We have like animations as a relationship and there's a logic going behind. We'll be having a API call to the back end to fetch some data. This is how it looks. And this is not a generic template pattern. Each forms views in a different way. It's pleasing to the user experience. So let's dive into building form. So this is from a documentation website. If you're building a form select as a input field, the user name and we have the options for that as a binding to the user name. So the template field has user name field and the submit button and the form as the callback submit, submit form and you're making some, this is our normal basic in form in a visual application. So let's assume you're building a form with client set validation. So let me go to the code pen and how it looks like. So here we have the input field and and we have the email field and we have the options like option fields. So this is, so here we have the validation. So we have the bindings here and we have the errors part that displays the that will enter the errors if it does. So on clicking submit, we will have the post check form, the check function checks whether name is required, name is there, email is there and check the email and for valid email, we have a regex. So this is how it looks like. So when I enter submit, I'm selecting anything. So this is like building a basic new approach of having a form with basic validation without using any library or any modeling. So let's build let's look at client associate validation. So this form basically we are the same as before. The only thing new is we are making a pay call on the response of the call. We are pushing the errors to this to enter it in the error. So let's look at the community plugins available. So view form it's a form validation library. So this is a popular library so you can find on awesome view. So we validate it's a template based validation library. I'll show you an example of it and view form generator is something like a form generator that generates the components for using a JSON. So these are three variants you can find. So let's see how to build up. What if we build up form using view form library? So here we have the binding fields name, password and confirm password and if you look at the template, this is a sample template of our form field will look like when you use a form view form. So basically the entire form has been covered by view form in the template and we have a valid it that covers the in that wraps the input field and we have field messages that renders the if there's any messages for the particular field and normal form input input that's it. So the response will contain something like this for each field we'll have a name. What's that? So the render part is something it's very simple. We have this three fields name, password and confirm password. So if you submit it without it so each errors will be mapped to the particular field. So you guys went through like all the examples so what we found so validations are duplicated in client side and backend side. So basically any form any post action will have a validation server side. So best practice to do a validation of both client and server side. So here the validation part is duplicated in the source client side as well as in the server side. What if like it's very difficult to maintain on a application that has 100 plus forms where each form field is very important. The mission critical application The second part is handling server error messages. You can see like the component that holds the form handles the the way it displays the error messages. So that will be duplicated in all in all the places. Let's say each component level like slight variations of it but end of the day like you'll be have you'll be duplicating the same code everywhere, spaghetti code. Let's assume if a form contains like 12 plus form fields and that's assumed based on a value of the and entered in the first field the like fifth field or sixth field get rendered or the options get changed in that case the validation and submission part a chat between the parent and child. Anyway, you won't be you won't be keeping the entire form in single component. You break down into small components. So we will have some ugly riffs and then we will be calling the child and it won't be easy to test it. That's what the fourth point says. So how do you write a, so it's very difficult to write a unit test. So how do you test it? Basically like the business logic of the form field. So it's quite difficult. And it's not scalable. So any product will have new features. So the number of form fields and the components keeps on growing it never stops. So let's team the form based. So what our goal should be like? It should be simple. It should be maintainable. It should be easier to test. It should be dry and it's flexible to add up any kind of form fields in the requirement of the future. demo. So we are going to be building a simple form field, a form like having a phone number that has a master input and a password. It's on our simple example of form. So let's look at the structure of the form component structure look like. So we'll be having a form and we'll have being a form field form. That's a render less component that wraps the form field. This is the actual form field which renders the UI. So each component takes care of different business logic. It has the different roles. Let me work through each one of them. It takes care of the rendering point. And so it's a source of growth, right? It interacts with the form. So it will limit the events all this to the parent. It can work independently with the form. It doesn't want to have a form wrapper for each and everything. You just want a search field or a normal unit input field. You can have it. And it can have a custom masking logic to fill from here. It's a wrapper container component. I think fancy. So on creation, it registers the form. So basically we will be moving the entire form state to the store will be maintaining this form to the store so that any part of application can interact with the store and get the values from the form. So on creation, like on the life cycle hook of the form for field from component. So it register the particular field to the store and it will attach a listeners to the field and it on validates the valid it takes care of the validation and updates a lot store. So this component is the one that interacts with the store, not the field component. So on destroy it removes the field from the store. So this is what it interacts with the basic the role of the field from component is to interact the store and update nothing doesn't do any doesn't transform the log value or nothing sort of actual form component. So basically on creation it register the itself to the store and it takes care of loading the validation part from the client side of the from the back end. So basically in charge we will load validation either from open IP spec. So we are a first company. We will be loading the we'll be adding specs. So we'll be generating validation from this open IP spec. So we use it for it and since it's a legacy app, so basically we will dynamically generate form field validations from the back end app itself. So we have a framework that supports it that gives the form, it's a form fields and the validation let it do it. So either way we can load it it takes care of the form submission part. So on destroy it removes the object from the store, form object from the store. Let's see the working demo. Let me show you the example and then let's walk through what we see. So basically it cannot be blank. So this how it works. Okay. So let me walk through the working logic. So on what's happening is we have a form store and we have a form. So form creates the sign up form. Let's assume that's a sign up form that sign up form gets loaded to the form store along with the validators. So this is a text field form what we see in the phone number field like the normal text field and the text field with the custom type. So your phone number gets filled, it gets registered into the sign up form and we have the text field that gets rendered into the UI. That's it. Let's see what happens on user input. Let's assume the user interacts with the text field. The value gets sanitized and then image to the parent. The parent is the wrapper form field. So it renders the, so basically in certain scenarios we'll be loading the form values to the form itself. So it takes care of that part too. So text field form updates the form store on every event from the text field. So it takes the validation and updates the form state. So let's say like in a form field you have like error state right? So this takes care of the validation part. So on destroy text field form, phone number text field from the sign up form. So basically I showed a demo previously, right? So where we have a sample form in charge, we have a template that goes beyond back and forth. So in that case, let's assume a field that gets unmounted will automatically get removed from the form store. So we don't have to write the logic. Hey, remove this form field from the store or remove this form field from the form state that contains the component that contains the form state. It works automatically. On destroy form delet the form store. That's it. The reason why we chose this approach is as I said in checkout where again developers like the worst integrating checkout through the site can modify the styles of the form, the custom masking logic, validation, everything. And the problem we had was why can't we go with the form generator? The problem is if you go with the form generator, then we will be following a generic pattern of the form field like not generic traditional form. But if you look at our app, we have a custom template. We can't like we don't know like what will be the template of the HTML part. We will have a section down there. We will have a link there and a text and the heading then would win. So it's it was very difficult to dynamically render the HTML template part. So what we did we hard quarter the template in the HTML and whether to show the field or not comes dynamically from the business logic. So that's the basic in a nutshell we had done it. So this is like as I said in validation. So right left hand side you can find the open aspect. This is a one of a form field that handles currencies. So here we have refund amount as an indigent money format is money value. So we can easily for validate whether it's a valid money format or what kind of can be anything. So basically we use open aspect for this kind of things standard pattern. On the right side is the way we load the form validators and then we dynamically load into the store. What are the key takeaways? Separation of concerns. So we can see each layer takes care of a particular part. So it's very easy to test and we can say like this a this component does this one. Even for a fresher let's assume we have like hundred plus form components and each and every in every page it works differently. It is very difficult for a fresher to go and modify it with this approach like you're able to easily say this component does this one. Nothing fancy or nothing other than that. So basically we use the we didn't go for the custom logic or something from the outside like patterns or libraries. We use whatever available in the view. So any problem arises so we have a solution for it. It is very flexible. It has a solution inside it. You have just to find out follow it like APFS development for any form fields. Otherwise it's kind of messy like will be like a spaghetti code in the end and make it developer friendly. Even for a fresher to look at the code they should feel like hey it's very easy to modify it and test it. So that was the core point of this talk. Thanks like any questions like you have like regarding charge be or view or forms. We can take about five questions. So I had one confusion. So the first one when the form loads how do you manage the state? So suppose we have 20 forms in our page. 20 forms. 20 forms. So we have login sign up this and that and 20. So how do you manage the state in that? So each form field will have a separate object. It has a separate object. It's a state object and sign form is a child of that object. See in an actual like just an object. We will dynamically register it and re-register it. So any page can interact with it. Let's assume like any component somewhere in the page can interact with it and let's assume like what value does store that has separate state getters and everything. And in that particular state you have all the 20 forms. Thank you. Hi. So your approach has a hard dependency on the store. Store being the Vuex store. Basically can use Vuex store or you can use the observables as well. Okay. So do you think what is the right approach to let's say if we try to make this approach as a generic one let's say we publish this library on a GitHub or something and at this point the library or the architecture would have a hard dependency on the store object. Store being the Vuex store. So how would you try to make it generic because the store could be at enterprise level applications could be fragmented into different modules. Okay. In that case you would be trouble in the name module space or could be at the just root level module space. So how would you try to identify and register or try to solve that problem? So Vuex is also like a normal view component that has a reactivity and we have some flux pattern. So you can use Vuex. Let the macro version of Vuex as a view observable thing and you can use it as a state object and then interact with it. End of this reactivity. Okay. So in that case so your approach will still have a third party dependency view observable. Vuex was his own stone API. If you look at the documentation you can find it. Okay. At my workplace we also deal with lots of huge forms and this has been a recurring issue. So the approach that we took towards sort of at least managing the form definitions was to go with a very descriptive JSON representation of the entire form including each of the elements as well as the relationships that would go and the rules that would bind all of them together and then we use this JSON representation both on the client side and the server side to make sure that we are able to both validate the form with same validation rules both on the client side and the server side along with making sure that we are able to upgrade components as well as form systematically across our applications making sure that everywhere you know we are able to push that update everywhere. So I just wanted to get your opinion on how I mean you find this approach compared to how you have been going about handling larger forms. Okay. To summarize what you said so basically you are using a JSON form like a form build. A JSON representation a much descriptive one which has everything right from the how to style that particular element to the validation rules that would apply or some binding rules to other elements within that form like so high rules and stuff like that. So basically form generator if you give the form generation to a builder it builds a form for you and that's the validation. More or less. To a builder or script that generates towards JSON depending upon the requirement. Actually it depends upon the scenarios let's assume in your case let's take a checkbox and a text so it will be same across your app but in our use case was like our design team based upon the scenarios in the use case we are different styling and different way the HTML structure. So we can't build then the JSON will become very complex and it won't be developer friendly and it will be like what JSON is going to do. So your approach depends upon the process. Generic and right to use case if you have a generic form fields like this is the input field this is the checkbox and this is the select box and this is the relationship it's fixed and in that case it's correct but in our case it was pretty complex and difficult. Thank you we can take one last question. Hi could you like highlight some of the key differences between bootstrap view forms and this view form package apart from the dependency on the store. Okay so this doesn't have a difference so basically in charge we have our own library we don't we don't use like bootstrap or any other beautiful any other payment for CSS as well so this doesn't depends on the template it's up to you so the developer defines the template so this is what nothing but the thinking of the logic between the store and the component so previously this logic will be present inside the component itself so we moved it make it try and then moved to store so found a generic pattern so this how it works


What's good, Joshua Ross back again with another video. So we're going to check out Triple H receiving backlash. Cody ended up losing a tooth During the Royal Rumble match Brock Lesnar was replaced As we ended up seeing the question is what position I know some people were saying Pat McAfee replaced Brock Lesnar I heard other people were saying Replace Brock Lesnar and other Royal Rumble related wrestling news appreciate all the love support guys have shown on the channel We're gonna check this out by WrestleMania What is going on guys it is WrestleMania here back with some more news join us now as we look at the wildest news stories and rumors You need to know including at Triple H gets backlash after addressing the Vince McMahon scandal Cody Rhodes Addresses the lawsuit and puts Triple H to shame Cody lost a tooth last night Roman Reigns versus the Rocks Still on Brock Lesnar was replaced and much more be sure to subscribe and hit that notification bell for daily wrestling videos and follow us on Facebook for exclusive lists to get a new website WrestleMania.com now let's hit the intro and get straight into our first story Now first we let's set Triple H backlash after addressing Vince McMahon scandal Our top story today examines the last night's Royal Rumble press conference in particular Triple H's controversial comments when it came to his father-in-law Vince McMahon It was inevitable that a journalist at the Royal Rumble press conference would ask the head of creative about the McMahon lawsuit and John Alba would ask the game if he had prior knowledge of McMahon's conduct is disclosed in the lawsuit a triple H would answer by saying I'm gonna do exactly what you expect me to do here Look, we just had an amazing week a 10 year 5 billion dollar Netflix deal rock joining our board We just sold out the Royal Rumble put 48,000 people in Tropicana field. I chose to focus on the positive Yes, there's a negative, but I want to focus on that and just keep it to that Triple H was then asked of the question of what's being done to make sure people in positions of power can't take advantage of employees And similarly to his prior answer the game had very little to say I'll give you the most generalized answer I can everything possible that is very important thing to us a very important topic to us It's as simple as everything possible Although it's apparent that triple H wasn't gonna say anything about the lawsuit Brandon Thurston would ask the game if he had actually read the lawsuit document and in a worrying answer triple 8 stated He did not I did not I did not I think Cody mentioned it that we all found out real time when you were there And that's the truth. I'll go back to what I said before. This is an amazing week to us I just at this point. I don't even want to get bogged down and the negatives of it I want to focus on the positives and where we're going and we're at the most exciting time of the year for us We're at the most exciting point to me business-wise. I think that we've ever had Triple H and added I think it's the best positioning of this company since the attitude era. I've been through the error I understand what it's like I feel like we're in the middle of something that well We may not be able to put our finger on it right now five ten years from now on We're gonna be saying wow what a time that was I want to focus on that and naturally triple H's lack of Concretances had led to much criticism even Dave Meltzer had a good take on this Your father-in-law was just accusers sex trafficking and rape everyone knows how much I personally like Paul But this was bad the most powerful man in history of the business was just removed in disgrace This was really bad now There is indeed the possibility that the head of creative is unable to address the case from a legal perspective Yeah, some fans believe that the game should have simply condemned the allegations stated in the lawsuit document and then just moved on However triple H looked like he was avoiding the question more than addressing it Yeah, Cody Rhodes also addressed the lawsuit which is crazy because they Cody Rhodes came on first and they asked him And he had kind of a better response from what I'm hearing that triple H had Which is crazy that they would ask Cody that but nevertheless, it could be a Multitude of things it could be the fact that maybe he couldn't really talk about it like from a legal standpoint Because there's a lot going on So that could have been an issue or a situation I know for a fact he was trying to focus on Obviously the positives of what's been going on in WWE. They just had a pretty successful in a sense of like Like people being at the venue 48,000 people for that Royal Rumble selling out that uh, that event so, you know they in their eyes, I had a pretty successful week pretty successful Royal Rumble and Kind of wanted to focus on that so I get it Granted if I want to be honest, is there a better way he probably could have responded to that, you know Yes, you know without even saying without even going into detail whether he believes it or not You know the allegations that he you know that he found out or whatever the case may have been he could have been Could have addressed it in a way where he's not given too much detail if he knew or anything like that But just you know kind of condemning what is being said in or what is being rumored to have happened or what not So he could have probably did that better And I'm still one of those people. I'm willing to bet he had some idea. He may not have known the exact Nature of what Vince was doing, but I'm willing to bet he had some notion in his head Vince was probably doing something that he shouldn't have been doing Even if it's not that particular situation, he's probably seen some stuff where as I yell Vince is wild and but Shit, I'm trying to get into his good graces. I'm trying to be able to make some moves myself So and once again, I think around the time that this that this young lady was You know dealing with what she was dealing with with Vince around that time. He was dealing with heart complex Heart problems. So even if he knew some situations in the past He was more so focused on his heart like his physical well-being more than anything else So it's one of those things. I'm sure he may have known a little bit of what was going on, but didn't have the Greatest details and once again, he was literally worried about his heart He wasn't really focused on other stuff other than his health and well-being. I can I'm pretty sure so And he put triple H to shame 2024 Royal Rumble winner Cody Rhodes was asked by Nick Hausman about the allegations and unlike triple H roads had an appropriate and respectful answer Yeah, I know as far as the news is concerned We were finding out and reading the same things that you guys were reading and you said a dark cloud Certainly as far as TKO Nick Khan and the board. They clearly took it very seriously acted immediately looking at the future I don't know the answer to that And I think somewhere is really basic tenant of just this crew more than ever from a roster standpoint is very family He continued on by saying I've never seen anything like this Most of the time wrestling locker rooms are fighting talking trash about each other making fun of each other Sandbagging each other in the ring all that nonsense. This crew is very team-based and perhaps that's the ingredient Everyone is looking out for everyone being accountable. I know for me as a performer as a competitor I've been through dark periods of our industry before and it might sound cheesy But it's very reinforcing if you're in my position that that it's a time when you say hey, we got 50,000 people out there I want to give them something else that isn't a terrible situation terrible news And I think we were able to do that obviously as more news comes out We'll be seeing it just as you do next up Cody And that was a real good response He he knocked that out the park. That was a good response because he addressed it. He also condemned it He also bigged up the roster like we're a family We're more family oriented than we've ever been in the business and we have each other's back that Triple H skidded somewhat did that a little bit. I don't know like I said, we don't know why But you know, he didn't really address it address it because you did his thing This is why they he's pretty much one of the faces of the company if not damn near the outside of Roman Reigns It's Cody Rose, bro. And this is why because he's able to you know Talk to people in a way where they feel comfortable it Unbelievable Rhodes loses a tooth. I did see speaking the American nightmare It looks like he lost a tooth in the annual Rumble match last night I found on Twitter to notice that Rhodes's tooth went flying as he was hit by a claymore by Drew McIntyre Outside of the missing tooth Rhodes seemed absolutely fine And it's unlikely he'll miss any time away from WWE programming. Next up triple H throws shade at forbidden door Mr. Tooth but still won the Royal Rumble so a Roman we coming for you missing tooth and all One of the more exciting elements of the rumble last night was the inclusion of TNA star Jordan Grace Yeah, TNA was named drops several times throughout the broadcast last night And it's great to see WWE involving TNA in a major match as it benefits both companies in the long run Triple H would reference Grace's involvement in the women's rumble during the po-show press conference And the game stated that he's not a fan of the cliched terms about what door people go through It's exciting just to be able to branch out I'm not gonna use the all the cliched terms about what door people go through or anything like that because it's stupid and silly Although triple H's attack on the forbidden door term seems random out of nowhere Fans are hoping that the partnership between WWE and TNA continues and fans are already throwing out the idea of seeing WWE contracted TNA legends appearing at special shows names such as AJ Styles, Abyss and Bobby Rooter All under WWE contract so it'll be epic to see one of the more of their names appear in the promotion where they became household names Yeah, that could be dope. That could be dope Obviously You know the AEW diehard fans did not like that comment and some of them had their fair Fair um fair choice of words for triple H's comments I wouldn't have taken that that serious, you know saying to be honest That's how he views it feels like it's a silly thing to say. Like, hey man, we're cross promoting You know, which is cool to see that they've done it before in the past But it's cool to see them really dive into that with TNA and I I think that's an awesome thing And it'll be awesome to see how things, you know, you know, what other collaborations TNA and WWE does in the future Roman Reigns vs. The Rock off the table now the heavy favorite heading into the rumble last night was CM Punk However, we're Cody, right? That's what My last video was just talking about All of a sudden everyone thought Cody was gonna win After he won some of y'all may have believed that for most of y'all Including myself Including a lot of people thought it was gonna be CM Punk the heavily favorite or goon Stop the cap stop line y'all Some of y'all may have been spot on with Cody winning back to back But they hadn't done that in so many years and I did not expect him to do that last night or not filming this It's a Monday morning, but I was not expecting that so Just saying Rhodes winning the matchup this guaranteed that Rhodes will be in a world title match at WrestleMania 40 Based on how WWE presented Rhodes victory on the show itself It was heavily implied that rones vs. Roman Reigns part 2 is now set for WrestleMania Which obviously means that rock vs. Reigns isn't planned at least for this year's spectacle However, Dave Meltzer mentioned that the plan is still for the Rock to face Roman Reigns. Yes, the Roman and Dwayne match is still happening I just don't know where and Brian you probably know where because you probably know discussions I may know too and I can't talk about them But anyway, the point is it's still happening As for punk it's still likely that it'll face Seth Rollins at WrestleMania 40 with Rollins being on the shelf currently it makes a ton of sense to have punk Chase the world title opportunity and the food and rivalry between the two enemies can take full shape when Rollins is available for weekly TV Next up triple H is high on Nia Jax Since returning to WWE last year Nia Jax has been presented incredibly well on TV WWE have utilized their strengths and for the most part Jax has had great matches across TV and PLE's Triple H acknowledged how high he and WWE are on the former women's champion last night on the post-show rumble press conference As the game stated that Jax had a fantastic performance in the rumble match and she's winning people over Also during the press conference triple H had endless praise for the women's rumble winner Bailey You'd refer to Bailey as constant and one of the all-time best Asthing stands if reports are to be believed Bailey will challenge EOS sky at WrestleMania 40 for the women's title and finally Brock Lesnar replaced Today takes a look at a potential NXT call-up as last night during the men's rumble match Brom Breaker had a standout performance He went on a rampage in the match itself and the eliminated names included almost and Finn Balor And what seems that this spot was intended for Brock Lesnar as it were opposed They will be returning and entering the Royal Rumble according to the Wrestling Observer Radio Brom Breaker replaced him Now Breaker was eliminated by Dominic Mysterio So was the initial planned Dom eliminating Brock that would have been huge During a backstage interview following his appearance Breaker stated that the main roster is now his home And he has unfinished business with the judgment day. I feel grateful right now What an opportunity tonight was to make a statement and I thought I did that tonight a hundred percent Things didn't go my way, but I'm not done with the judgment day by any means tonight approved I belong on the main roster. This is my home now and I'm ready for the work Yes, I'm ready to prove to my peers and to everyone there who believes me that this is where I belong You know when I was born to do judgment days got it coming. I promise you they have it focused on all this new story I'm I'm ready for it. If that's the few they're gonna start going with him feuding with the judgment day even though I Prefer him as this dominant Destructive heel as he's been portrayed lately in NXT him going against the judgment day instantly gonna make him a baby face No, let's they keep him cleaner ish, but people love to hate Dominic. Oh, this that's what they're doing I'm here for it. I am here for it. They they have something So we'll see if when that does, you know happen, but I'm here for it, man Braun Breaker was the highlight of the men's Royal rumble in my opinion. He was impactful he Was just destroying people and even the crowd got alive when he got out there You can hear them doing a whoo-hoo-hoo about he was killing people and I loved every second of it So to me very interesting to see how that play out but comment down below. Let me know man Which part of the this particular video like the news reports Um For comment down below. Let me know some other videos you guys want me to check out, but I appreciate all of the support You guys are on our channel roads. I'm 50k and I'm still getting speeded you to rest in chamber the world