Good afternoon, ladies and gents. Welcome to this FOMC and, to a lesser extent, Bank of Japan preview webcast webinar, whatever you want to call it first and foremost, I have to put up a risk warning and disclaimer, part for the course for these events. Nothing that you hear in this particular webinar should be construed as trading advice. Essentially what we're trying to do is run the rule over a whole host of potential scenarios, what the Fed is hoping or what the Fed is likely to say, and the potential market reactions to that. So once I've got these risk warnings out of the way, we can get started. So, yeah, basically I think if anyone is expecting anything significant out of the Fed from this April meeting, it's unlikely we're going to see it. We're not going to get a rate rise. We are not going to get a press conference. But what I'd like to talk about is this Bloomberg page here. It's WIRP and it's market expectations for rate rises over the course of the rest of this year. Now, those probabilities and the probabilities that I'm most interested in are the probability of a hike. So in June, the market is assigning around about a 19.6 possibility that the Fed reserve will raise interest rates. April, they're assigning a 0% possibility of a rate hike, a 2% probability of a cut, which I find highly amusing, and a 98% probability that rates will remain unchanged. So that looks like the most probable outcome. In fact, I would argue that it is the only likely outcome. But ultimately, what we're most interested in these numbers here, and in particular the June number, because the June number, a 1 in 5 possibility, less than a 1 in 5 possibility that we could get a rate rise in June, seems a little bit too dovish for my liking. And I think, and Colin probably agrees with me that I think the Federal Reserve may want to move the odds of that up slightly if they really want to keep the prospect of a June rate rise in play. And really, this is all about perception. It's not about whether they will do it. It's not about whether they won't do it. It's what they want the market to think. And at the moment, they want the market to think that June is a live meeting. At the moment, according to that chart, June is not a live meeting. And I think the Federal Reserve, in its statement, may want to readdress that balance ever so slightly. And if they do that, that could prompt a US dollar rally. It probably won't prompt a sustainable US dollar rally. But nonetheless, it will prompt a little bit of a push higher in the dollar and a push lower in the euro, a push lower in the pound, and a push higher in the dollar yen. I don't know whether you want to expand on any of that, Colin. Absolutely. Thank you, Michael. Yes, I do keep track of the Fed as their speakers have been going through, and particularly some of the regional voters and the swing voters. And the Fed's kind of been in three camps, and the dovish camp, the neutral camp, and the hawkish camp. So the dovish camp has kind of been pushing towards delaying rate hikes as long as possible. And the neutral camp includes Fed, Chair Yellen, and most of them that have kind of, well, we'll keep an eye on the data, and basically the Fed wants to keep their options open. And then there's the hawkish camp, who are people like Kansas City's Esther George, who want to raise rates right now. And the ones I've been watching for the most that have been swing voters this year have been Bullard and Rosengren. They're the two more dovish of the regional governors voting this year, and George and Mester are the two more leading to the hawkish side. And Bullard has been going back and forth. When the oil price crashed, he went from hawkish to dovish. As oil came back, he went kind of from dovish back to neutral heading towards hawkish. But both him and Rosengren, who is a dove, have both said to the markets that they think the street's been overly pessimistic about the prospects for a rate rise. They think the street's been overly dovish. And they've been trying through their speeches to nudge people back towards the middle. I think the Fed would prefer to see that June number instead of a 20% more back up towards 50%. And I think the bond market in general has been more dovish. And because if you look at the currency market, has been sitting just below 95%. And my feeling is as we look at this, that when the dollar index was up at 100 was when people were thinking there was four hikes this year. And at 95, people are thinking they did two hikes this year. And if we were to move to zero hikes like the bond market, you'd probably see the U.S. dollar index crash back to 90. So as Michael noted, if you see the Fed kind of steering people still towards two hikes this year, the dollar index might go up a little bit, perhaps peak back above 95 a little bit. And that's probably about it because the currency market is already essentially pricing in still two hikes this year. If you're going to get two hikes, you're looking at June and December. The Fed would want to stay away from the election campaign, particularly since it looks like it's going to be quite a wild one with Trump and Clinton becoming the presumptive nominees. It's going to be a pretty crazy election campaign. I think the Fed's going to want to stay clear of that. If you go in June, it's after the primaries and before the conventions. So if that's the time, that's the ideal time if the Fed's going to do two hikes this year to raise one. Yeah, I think that's right. I think the optimum time is June. Unfortunately for the Fed, I think there's a distinct possibility that the data may move against them and may force their hand a little bit because thus far the data this year hasn't been particularly great, particularly on the manufacturing side, but also I think you'll find on the consumer side. We saw that disappointing Dallas Fed survey yesterday. I think it was yesterday, wasn't it? And some of the respondent comments were, well, let's just say they didn't point to an awful lot of optimism about the U.S. economy. I mean, one of the comments that was made by one of the speakers was something about ISIS, gas, oil, not really much to get excited about. And that's pretty much Gallo's comments. And that doesn't speak to an awful lot of confidence with respect to the manufacturing sector. Furthermore, if we look at durable goods and we look at retail sales, and I'm going to display a little chart of that here, on the right-hand column here, we've got durable goods numbers for the last two to three months. And apart from a decent number in January, we had a horrible number in February and we've had a disappointing number in March. Now these numbers here are excluding transport. Transport's a very volatile volatile. I tend to exclude them. And the total durable goods numbers since January 2015, that's the net decline. So over the course of the last 15 to 16 months, durable goods, which is essentially white goods, big ticket items like big screen TVs, you're talking about potential home improvement, that sort of thing, that's been pretty disappointing. And retail sales, again, over the course of the last three months, minus 0.7, minus 0.3. So Q1 has been very, very disappointing for certainly the US consumer. They've shown that they've got no indication that they want to go out and spend money. And this is despite the fact that fuel prices in particular are well below the levels that we saw a year ago. So I would agree that jobs growth has been very, very good. It's been very, very steady. We haven't seen that much in the way of what I would call significant wage growth, apart from a spike in January, where we had a big jump of 0.5. And ultimately, in answer to your question about whether or not the US economic figures suggest a rate rise is likely, I would just suggest a rate rise is not likely, based on the data that we've seen thus far. But being that as it may, I don't think that will stop the Fed from being a little bit hawkish and talking up the prospect of a rate hike, even if one is not likely, because if they talk up the prospect of a rate hike, they at least have the option of dialing back on that rhetoric. Yes, and I think one of the things we're watching for the US is, for example, if you look at the Dallas Fed, it's awful. And there's no question Dallas region is in a recession. That's the heart of the oil sector in America. And they're just getting crushed. And Richmond was a little better.  And so the thing with the US is, and I think it's something the Fed's kind of got to manage, is that you've got certainly a major chunk, a major region of the economy is no doubt in recession. And some of the other areas are doing reasonably well. And how do you manage that? And I think there's also a bit of expectations there as well. You'd expect to see a bit of a slowdown in, say, consumer spending or durable goods orders. As the Fed starts raising rates, people get used to just in reaction to the December hike. And then the question is, does this persist? Because normally the Fed starts raising rates. It's a sign that the economy is good. People get over the transition phase. And then things go again. But one thing we've seen with the Fed this year, is they've kind of been muddying the waters. They've been waffling a lot. Because there were four rate hikes, they were going to raise in March, and then they didn't. And so we're getting a lot of really mixed signals from the Fed itself. And I think that's not helping matters. So we're going to do a bit of a chicken or the egg argument here as well with the, is the data slow, meaning that the Fed has to continue to waffle on rates? Or is the data slow because the Fed's been waffling on rates? The answer is probably a bit of both. And so it's a funny when they say they're open to data, and then at the same time they want to do, follow some kind of a program. And that's where I think there's a lot of confusion in the economy and the markets and what have you. And until this kind of settles itself out, we'll probably see more of these kind of back and forth arguments and discussions, because it's kind of, things kind of support both sides. Yeah, I've been asked another question. If the Fed is hawkish, will equity market sentiment improve and overcome a possible downturn? Well, I think the jury is out on that. I don't know whether you've got a view on this, but I think if the Fed is slightly hawkish, I think it'll cap any equity market rally through 2100, certainly on the S&P. You know, we're pretty much close to the all-time highs. Yes, we have broken higher. More broadly, over the past, say, three or four weeks, certainly across the board, certainly the UK, the FTSE 100 has broken higher, the DAX has broken higher. But I think what struck me about these moves higher and the fact that the S&P is now in positive territory for the year is how weak these recoveries have been. Now, there's been an awful lot of chatter in the press. I don't know whether any of you guys have been watching Bloomberg over the course of the past few days, but there's been talk about a Golden Cross on the S&P 500. And those of you who don't know what a Golden Cross is, it's when the 50-day moving average crosses above the 200-day moving average, and it's generally perceived to be a very positive signal. But it's only conceived to be a very positive signal if the market is actually doing something, so if it's reversing something. So in this case, a Golden Cross will be very, very positive at the end of a long-term downtrend. By the opposite token, a death cross where the 50-day moving average crosses below the 200-day moving average, you'd want to take notice of it at the end of an uptrend. So in the context of this particular discussion, and I have covered it in some detail in my weekly video, which can be found at youtube.com.com. We can see here on the S&P 500 that we've seen the 50-day moving average cross above the 200-day moving average. But look what the 200-day moving average is doing. It's pretty flat. And also, we had a similar crossing in the middle of December last year, and we failed. And I think the question that's being asked is, is this another failure, or is this maybe a precursor to a break of the previous highs and for a move higher? Well, ultimately, we don't know. Could you take it a little longer, Michael, to like a one year or a year and a half? Yeah, that's better. I think what's important to note is the context of these, that's good there, of these Golden Crosses, which are, if you look, the S&P's basically been in the sideways trend for the last year and a half. And when we go into sideways trends, the 50-day and the moving average just kind of keep crossing each other back and forth. And so to look at the Golden Cross and the Death Cross for that matter, they lose their relevance when you're in a sideways trend. And that's what Michael's kind of been getting at. Whereas if you looked at the previously in that late 24, early 2015, S&P was trending higher. 50-day was consistently above the 200-day. You had the first Death Cross. And it confirmed a big sell-off. Now what ended up happening was instead of continuing lower into a downtrend, we went into a sideways trend. But still, that was the signal of the trend change that first crossed in, I guess that was about September or so. But these last two are just, they just happened within sideways trends. Yeah, and I think this is the point that I'm really sort of trying to make here. I'm just going to bring this up one second. I'm going to open this in a slightly different format so that we can get a better flavor of it. Okay, so let's blow this up to about 200%. So this is what happened at the end of 2011, beginning of 2012. Now we've got the two moving averages. There's the 50-day crossing the 200-day and it's crossing higher. And this is the end of the downtrend. But what is also happening here is that we bottomed out around just above 1,000, made a slight double bottom there. We made a new peak here. We came back, didn't take out the previous slope. And what we've got here is a triangle, a potential triangle breakout. So we've got the previous downtrend in place. We've got a new uptrend starting to develop and the price action is starting to compress. And it's compressing in a way that ultimately, when it breaks, it will break very sharply in the direction of the breakout. So what we've got here is we've got the market being capped by the 200-day moving average after acting as support, axis resistance, resistance, resistance. We've got the break of the downtrend line and then a few days later, we get the golden cross. So when you get all of those factors all at once or within a few days of each other, all the 50 and the 200 are doing is merely confirming what's happened with respect to your primary indicators, the trend line break, the break above resistance of the 200-day moving average. So ultimately, what I'm saying is, fairly simply, if you're looking for an indication of a trend reversal, just the 50 and the 200 crossing is not enough. You need other confirmatory signals and ultimately, we're not getting them at the moment. And actually, if anything, we are actually getting a potential reversal forming on the daily chart here because what we've got is a potential evening star reversal, potential bearish engulfing day there as well. And that in itself could actually cause this to start to roll over and drift lower back towards the 50-day moving average and this series of lows here. So am I taking any notice of this golden cross? No answer? No. Right, so that's the S&P 500. We've got these series of peaks here. We've got the November peaks here and then we've got the other peaks from last year, early last year, all the way back here. So there's an awful lot of resistance coming in above 2000, 2100. And ultimately, you have to ask yourself the question, what would prompt the S&P 500 to break higher at a time when earnings estimates are continuing to be revised lower and the Fed is going to be very, very reluctant to ease, let alone hike? That's the question I ask myself when I look at these equity markets. And it's a pretty similar... Sorry, are you going to say something? I was just going to say, it's quite interesting when I look at the earnings that have been coming out this quarter because we've had a... And then it also works back into the Fed a bit as well, which is that we're kind of getting a mixed quarter here in that people were really pessimistic heading in and you'll recall the guidance from previous... from last quarter, last time around, was very negative. People were really pessimistic. And this time we have had some... a fair number of positive surprises overall. I don't think things were quite as bad as what they were thinking, but we've had quite a few high-profile misses as well. We had Apple, we've had Boeing, we've had Microsoft, we've had Google, but we've had some positive surprises like DuPont and P&G. So it's a mixed quarter. And I think one of the things we're getting here in earnings was that one of the reasons forecast came down was the higher dollar was hitting U.S. corporate earnings and was impacting those forecasts going forward. The dollar has come down. And so some companies have said, well, the forex impact is easing, our forecasts are improving, whereas other companies haven't gotten there yet. I had figured this quarter would be too soon to see that, so I was shocked that DuPont and others have even done it at all. I thought it would be one of the next two rounds of earnings that we'd start to see more of the benefits of the U.S. dollar retreat. But that circles back to the Fed and the U.S. dollar, which is I don't think the Fed wants to go too aggressive and push the dollar index back up towards 100 because that crushes corporate earnings. At 95 is helping, 90 would probably be a lot better for them. So it's a matter now of do they stay this course of two rate hags which the currency has priced in. I don't think they won't go hawkish beyond that. And then at the same time, if they go dovish, then that could actually help the earnings side. So we'll see what happens. Excuse me, so I think we're in a little bit of the corridor of uncertainty right here. You've got resistance at 95. It looks to be fairly well supported around about 93, but overall I think the bias for the Fed would be for the dollar index to drift a little bit lower but not aggressively lower. And essentially I think why you've seen Euro dollars struggle to really push higher to any great degree. And ultimately if you think that the next move in the dollar is going to be lower rather than higher, then ultimately you've got to think to yourself, how are the Fed going to manage that? And ultimately I think the way they'll manage it at worst is they'll come across as slightly positive which will make the market think that June is still on the table. But ultimately it will cap equity markets to an extent because it'll keep the equity markets off balance because they're not really sure what the Fed's going to do in June. But ultimately it'll also stop markets driving the dollar higher as well. So what does that mean for dolly end? Because we're talking about the Fed at the moment and the likelihood he is will probably get a very nuanced statement with a slight hint at tightening and the hawks will take what they want from it and the doves will take what they want from it and unfortunately never the twain will meet. But ultimately that could cause a bit of a push higher in the dollar but ultimately my view on dolly end is we're going to 106. So the big question then is how do we get there? And now we could get there as a result of what the Bank of Japan do tomorrow. Ultimately I don't think it's really going to be of that much consequence. I think once dolly end decides it wants to go somewhere it goes there irrespective of what the central bank wants it to do or not. The only thing that they can control is the speed at which it gets there. And ultimately I think that's what the Bank of Japan is probably more worried about than anything else at the moment. Certainly what we've seen here would appear to suggest that we're probably going to start settling into a bit of a range but ultimately I still expect dolly end to come back to 106.50. Why? Because that's the 38.2 retracement of this entire up move from the lows at 75 to the highs here. We've broken out on this head and shoulders reverse or potential triple top whatever you want to call it. Our minimum price objective brings us in a 106.68 which also coincides with a 38.2% retracement. So I think and I've been saying this since pretty much two months ago. Once we broke below this level here, 106 was my target. If you go back to the video that I recorded in the middle of February as well as my colleague Jasper, we pretty much agreed the same sort of thing. Once we broke this support level here, 106 is really only a matter of time. Now the big question is how do we get there? We could go all the way back to 112, 113 or 114 but overall whatever you think about helicopter money in Japan, we've already seen the effects of what negative rates did to the end. They didn't send it down, they sent it up. So ultimately it's a question of how effective do you think the Bank of Japan can be by going all in. It's pretty much all in at the moment. The Bank of Japan's pretty much owns 10% of the Japanese stock market and ultimately we haven't seen any evidence of inflation and we haven't seen any evidence whatsoever of a pickup in economic activity which is not surprising considering the recent earthquakes. It's going to take time for anything that the Bank of Japan does to help pick up economic activity and ultimately it's down to that third arrow, Shinzo Abe's third arrow, structural reform. And ultimately in the absence of structural reform, central banks are finding that they're operating at the limits of their ability to control what their currency is doing. And ultimately if the Bank of Japan is up against the Federal Reserve and as Colin said, if investors are pricing in two or three rate rises this year in dolly yen and they only get one, what does that do to the dolly yen? It sends the dollar down because the market's positioned wrongly. He asked if I was Mr. Koroda what would I do? Well I couldn't really do much more than what I'm trying to do now. Ultimately it's up to the politicians. All central bankers can do is try and provide the conditions with which the governments can implement structural reforms. If governments refuse to implement structural reforms and this is just as true for Mr. Koroda as it is for Mr. Draghi. Mr. Draghi is facing the exact same problems. What we could get later tonight or early tomorrow morning is we could get the Bank of Japan announced the potential to basically pay banks to lend money in the same way that Mr. Draghi announced those June TLTROs where basically he said that he would pay banks up to 0.4% to lend money to the real economy. The problem with that is the loan demand there and people will only borrow money if they think there's an even chance that they'll get that money back and more in terms of sales, revenue growth and that sort of thing. We're not seeing that at the moment. The US earning season is disappointing and that is what deters investment. We've seen Apple's results overnight. The stock price now is down around 7% or 8%. Despite the fact that it's still generated $10 billion in profits on revenues of $51 billion, but it's the first lower revenues in 13 years in 51 quarters and ultimately it's all about expectations and $51 billion is not too shabby, but unfortunately this is Apple we're talking about and expectations are a lot higher than that. So let's move on. So basically, at the moment we're struggling around about this <IP_ADDRESS> level. We could head back towards around about <IP_ADDRESS>. Ultimately I still think the line of lease resistance is for a move lower while we're below this cloud resistance here and this trend line resistance from the peaks that we saw in the middle of February. But ultimately for me the direction of travel is set. The big question is how we get there and unfortunately I can't answer that for you. Similar sort of story for cable. This is something again that I covered in my weekly video. We are currently very overbought on dollar sterling, but what we have seen is a potential head and shoulders reversal unfold. With the neckline through here at 1.44, we've broken above the 100 day moving average at 1.44.5. So potentially on the basis of this, on the evidence of this breakout, we could test this trend line resistance from the august ties here, which currently comes in around about 1.47. But ultimately my target for cable is 1.51 based on measuring this move here from the lows in March to the neckline and then projecting it from the breakout point. This is a classic inverse head and shoulders breakout. I'm being asked, is cable all about Brexit? Yes and no. There is the push-pull effect of what the Fed may or may not do. The pound is actually pulling back because the opinion polls are moving in favour of the remain campaign. But I also think that an awful lot of the very bearish rhetoric was overdone on cable. People talking about 1.30, 1.25. When people start talking in those terms, usually they're talking their book and it usually means it is time to go long. What we've got here is a left shoulder 1.4080, a right shoulder at 1.4050 and a neckline which comes in here. So we could fall all the way back to around about 1.44.5, potentially even back to the 100-day moving average. But ultimately, if this breakout pattern here is right, then we're probably going to see initially 1.47 will come back, potentially head towards 1.49 over the course of the next few days and weeks and potentially even go back to 1.50. Does that necessarily mean that the opinion polls are not going to introduce volatility on the way? Of course they will. We could well see a big sell-off as we get into June and the vote gets closer. So by no means is this a done deal that we're going to go higher, but certainly on the basis of the price action, then you have to have a target, you have to have a view. My view is that we're more likely to see 1.50 than we are 1.40. Yeah, it certainly does look like it's recovering here. That's a beautiful pattern. In fact, where you have the falling neckline, if you draw it straight across as the horizontal neckline, that's pretty much where we are right now. So we're retesting that peak of early February and if we start going through that and that blue trend line you've got on there, that looks pretty good. And that initial one also where you've got the Fibonacci level and the 200-day moving average also looks quite intriguing as a cluster point where you could see an initial move on a breakout. And Michael's right. I mean, we've had a lot of volatility, but I think the Brexit fears were built in trading into the sterling was getting really overdone back in February. And we're seeing that as we go through that this right shoulder has been carved out amongst still what we would have think would have been more bearish talk. And we had every one of these downward pulses was related to something, whether it was polls favoring the leave campaign or some of the things that Boris Johnson had done with joining the thing and some of the turmoil in the cabinet and stuff like that. And each of these pulses down though through March and April have not been able to push it lower and that's telling you that the limits of pessimism and cable have probably been reached and now we're seeing it working out. But again, June is probably going to be all over the place just like we saw with the Scottish vote and to a lesser extent the election last year. And if you look at the slow stochastic, the oscillator is looking a little bit overboard. So at these sorts of levels, I would suggest the air is a little bit thin and we could drift back down towards the moving averages over the course of maybe the next couple of days. But that's not to say that I don't think we could go higher. The big question is how we get there. And at the moment, given where we are, certainly in relation to this year, we're probably at the higher levels of where I thought we'd be say two or three weeks ago. So we'll just have to wait and see how this plays out. And it's a similar sort of story on Eurodollar as well. I think the balance of probabilities on Eurodollar suggests we go higher, not lower. But ultimately, we're in a range and we've been in a range for quite some time as borne out by this one-year chart here. And we can see where the clusters of resistance are because apart from the occasional spike through 1.15 in August last year and February last year, we've pretty much been trading sideways as well on Eurodollar in the same way that we've been trading sideways in the S&P, which is quite interesting. If we break higher in Eurodollar, we could see the S&P trade lower because if you turn that chart upside down, you might as well be looking at the S&P.  And it's really counter-intuitive, isn't it? Because you're talking Mario Draghi, you're talking negative rates and you're talking potentially further Euro downside, further dollar strength, and yet the price action would appear to suggest that for all of that rhetoric, the market doesn't want to go lower. It just does not want to go lower. Every time the market wants to push Eurodollar lower, it finds a steady stream of buyers at steadily higher levels. We bottomed in December, then we got January, then we got March, now we got April. And that December was a double bottom, and I think what we're getting to is we're kind of getting out to the end of this easing stimulus cycle. We're not there yet. They're still talking like they're trying to do more, but I think one thing we've seen is that when the first stimulus came in several years ago led by the Fed, it was working and it was helping, and now we're getting the more stimulus comes in, the less effect it's having, but we're still getting the rhetoric, but we're not getting the results. And sooner or later, I think the street is seeing that this is going to come to an end and they're going to have to start going back the other way or at least back to neutral. The pendulum though, it's the pendulum. Yeah, it's pendulum at one end. And it's starting to swing back the other way. Yeah. And certainly in the context of these, this particular chart here, certainly based on the price action of the last five months, the euro is finding support at progressively higher levels. And that suggests to me, the shorts are going to get stale in euro and they're going to get impatient and eventually they're going to lose patience and they're going to bust it through 115 and we're going to go to 120 based on the price action that we're seeing right now. Certainly if you look at this spike lower here and the long shadow on this candle, that would seem to suggest that every time we go lower, we're finding buyers, the buyers aren't waiting anywhere near as long as they did in the past. So euro, dollar and cable do look as if they could actually go higher and not lower, which brings us neatly on to euro sterling. We're overrunning slightly, but I think that's fine as long as you guys are prepared to stick with us. Euro sterling, I posted on my blog the other week, a very nice bearish and golfing week. So that suggests that we are probably going to test the bottom of this level here around about 76.90 while we're below 78.60 and the oscillator is turning over. That suggests that probably we are probably going to drift lower. We may squeeze higher first around about 78.60, but overall now that we're back below the 200 week moving average, which is disappointing given that we broke above it, false break, we're probably going to trend back lower towards 76.90 and potentially 75.20. If you look at it on the daily chart, it's probably not as cut and dried. We are looking to find a little bit of a base around here, which would suggest that maybe we're probably going to range around here a little bit, maybe test here, but ultimately rebound back towards these sorts of levels. So a stronger pound, slightly weaker euro over the course of the next few sessions I would suggest. Is there anything else, ladies, that you would want us to cover before I move on to Brent Crude? Because that also ties in with the dollar story that we've been talking about and the FOMC apologizes this chart looks a little bit cluttered. But again, it's surprising actually this Brent Crude chart looks in terms of where the market is going. We've bottomed out. This is Brent in January. We've slowly started to ratchet higher. The lows are getting higher. The highs are getting higher. Momentum is taking us higher and when we broke out here, my minimum price objective, and again I covered this in a video a few weeks ago, was $44 a barrel. We've now overshot it. So now the next resistance level is around about $47.60 a barrel. So again it's a similar sort of story and why is it a similar sort of story? Weaker dollar. The narrative is the same. There's a common theme running through all of this. It was a stronger dollar that sent oil lower. It was a stronger dollar that sent euro lower. It was a stronger dollar that was weighing on stock markets globally. Now that the dollar is starting to weaken, that's when you've got the recovery in stock markets at the beginning of February as oil prices started to recover and the dollar started to weaken. So these correlations are important and it's important to understand how they work and again here, we've got potentially the 50 coming up to meet the 200-day moving average is trending lower. So even if they cross over, it doesn't necessarily mean it's a strongly bullish signal because the 200-day is moving down. Long-term momentum is still negative despite the fact the short-term momentum is turning positive. Do you want to expand upon that Colin or do you want to move on to dollar CAD because dollar CAD is a complete proxy for crude oil? Yes. Let's go in actually. We'll go to the dollar CAD and we're getting a little bit overbought here on the stochastics again and so the previous time we saw that back in March it kind of went sideways for a month so don't be surprised if we see oil start to level off at some point fairly soon. And let's go to dollar CAD. I'm just going to bring something up here actually just give me one second. So we're going to bring up dollar CAD for you because it's a nice little show here. As well we're on the topic of how the OE inventories have come out and they're showing a rise of just under about 2 million barrels for the U.S. crude oil and a rise of 1.6 million barrels for gasoline. So that contradicts the decline we had in the API inventories last night and so that could put a bit of a cap on crude oil in the near-term and so for WTI we're looking at $45 and so I reason I wanted to mention that we're going now into and we're seeing that come back off a little. So let me dimension that on the Canadian dollar as well. So this is a WTI chart we've pushed back off this 138 level which is at $43.80 so that actually works as a nice little resistance level and again in chart we could well start to drift lower and that's exactly what is happening right now on the inventory data which has dropped pretty much the best part of the dollar already on the back of that inventory data but that's not a big move in the context of the way oil prices have been moving over the course of the last few days you can see yesterday's big up move there so we've dropped the dollar but look how far up we went yesterday so even if we give back half of that we're still up on the week so it's always important to bear that sort of thing in mind. So what does that mean for the Canadian dollar? So the Canadian dollar is going to weaken slightly and certainly we are seeing that being played out right now. Yeah. It was getting oversold already on the stochastics and getting close to that $125 so that's $125 for dollar CAD that's $0.80 for CAD US dollar that's a really, really big psychological level on both sides of that pair and so a point where we would expect and especially given the stochastics and the RSI reaching extreme levels that it's probably getting to a point where we would be expecting it to pause anyways and now we're seeing that starting to come back up a little bit with crude oil coming back off so it's at a point where it's due for at least some sort of pause maybe a correction here, minor correction. Right now that trend's pretty solid. And the Federal Reserve could play into that so you could get a decent rally in dollar CAD back to around about $127.128 without unwinding the downward momentum that's been in place since January and again, you know, you look at dollar CAD that's when Brent crude that's when WTI bottomed out and started to recover and as soon as oil started to recover and the dollar started to weaken and the Canadian dollar started to strengthen and started to push the dollar lower so again the correlation and the effect coming into play there. Let's finish up with gold, shall we Colin? That perennial old favourite and again, since the beginning of the year gold has been trading pretty much sideways with solid support around about $1205 decent resistance around $1280 and with slap bang in the middle of that slightly positive today. Yeah, they've still been trying to make it with gold whether that's ahead and shoulders top sideways trend. Our RSI has been sitting bang on $50 for days and we're seeing the stochastics basically sitting on $50 so that kind of leans to me towards we've had this nice run up off $1,000 to $1,200 and change and now I think we're just kind of we're just kind of digesting that and we'll probably see that continue in the near term until we get some kind of a direction on the U.S. dollar we saw with the U.S. dollar that we had come down from $100 and it's flattened out $94.95 and we're seeing the same thing gold being the inverse of that that we had the big rally in gold and now it's kind of flattening out as well. Okay, so actually let's finish off with the Australian dollar because we've got an RBNZ meeting tonight I believe, Colin. We do, it's three hours after the Fed so the Fed's at two o'clock eastern time and the RBNZ at five o'clock p.m. eastern time. So let's have a look at this weekly chart. That weekly chart is quite interesting. Look at that spike higher which is quite interesting. Yes, I've been watching 70 closely. I talked a little bit about $80 a cat 70 on Kiwi dollar because there's been some talk a little bit of talk lately that officially the market consensus is that the RBNZ is going to do nothing but there had been some chatter that maybe they could cut interest rates is with the Kiwi dollar getting back up to 70 that we watched the statement really closely because I suspected that they'll probably try and talk the dollar down. I think that they don't want the dollar to breach 70 too much and the Kiwi dollar, that is and so there's two ways that can do that. Either they could outright threaten the intervention and they have, RBNZ is an activist central bank they actually do intervene in the forex market so we watched that one way they could try and talk it down is hinting that they could cut rates if they don't cut rates today that they can hint that towards cutting rates sometime in the next couple of meetings and that could put a cap on the dollar as well which is particularly interesting given the action we saw in the Aussie dollar overnight. Which then brings us neatly on to the Aussie dollar because that weak inflation reading this morning has increased the prospects that we could see a rate cut next week. Now Australian dollar rates are at 2% or RBA rates are at 2% inflation, quarterly inflation came in at minus 0.2 but let's look at why quarterly inflation was so weak in Q1. Look at what oil prices did in Q1. Look at what general commodity prices in general did in Q1. It's no surprise that inflation was the economy saw price deflation in Q1. Since then, prices have recovered. Prices have recovered quite considerably and while the RBA is worried about the strength of the Australian dollar exchange rate will they cut rates next week when an awful lot of that deflation is in the rear view mirror. Commodity prices have recovered quite strongly since then, iron oars hit $70 as a ton. Copper prices have rallied quite sharply as have oil prices. So I'm thinking that quarterly effect is going to be a very niche reaction for the RBA to cut rates on a quarterly inflation number where commodity prices in some respects have rebounded more than 50% from the levels that they were in Q1. It's an interesting one but certainly I think a fear of a rate cut is actually driving Aussie dollar lower and obviously the US dollar higher. So let's look at the weekly candle chart. Let's see how we finish this week and certainly this chart really doesn't tell us too much. We got a very long up the shadow there. This looks as if it's going to engulf all of that candle there but even if it does, where's it going to bring us down to? This series of lows through here is around 75, 74, 50. That's only about 130 points below where we are now. Doesn't mean that we can't go lower. There's a good chance we could but ultimately I think what could determine that could be next week's Chinese data which is the manufacturing and services PMIs. So keep it on this trend line here ladies and gentlemen. It's around about 75. Also coincides with those lows there. If we break below here then I think there's a good chance then break lower. But ultimately I think in the short term this level could hold. We'll get a rebound and then we might break lower but we'll see. Anyway Colin do you have anything you want to add? No I think we've pretty much covered everything. Okay. Unless there are any other questions ladies and gents we're going to conclude today's webinar and just like to say thank you all for attending. Yes thank you and we'll talk to you again next week on Friday when we have the nine front payrolls. Non-farm payrolls Friday next week. 115 to 145. UK time. Great. Great.


Let's talk about events. It is called event groups within FreeRTOS API and event flags within CMC's OS version 2. It is not implemented within CMC's OS version 1. Event allow a task to wait for a combination of 1 or more events. Once an event occurs, it may unblock all the tasks that are waiting for it. Of course, if the tasks are not waiting for more than one event. As a result, unblocked task is moved from blocked to ready state. Events code is stored within event underscore groups.c file and event underscore groups.h file, which needs to be added to the code once we plan to use them. It requires some additional FreeRTOS components to be fully operational. We will describe it in next slides. Once you are generating code from stinferty to kubemix or kupide, those two files are added automatically once you generate even the simplest code based on FreeRTOS. It requires creation like most OS components. So to use events, we need to create and separate OS component like we're doing within semaphores or queues. And this object has its own control block to store its configuration and status. Events are supported within CMC's OS version 2 as event flags and within FreeRTOS API as event groups. What are the main advantages of events? It is allowing to reduce RAM usage by replacing various combinations of semaphores. It is simplifying the synchronization among the tasks by waiting for a combination of events. It allows to be read by multiple tasks, which are waiting for the information. It allows to use broadcasting mechanisms within operating system and it can be used within other tasks and interrupts. Event groups are using 16 or 32-bit long variables to store events. So each event means one bit set within this variable. This variable is defined within event underscore groups.c file as event bits underscore t and it can be 16-bit value without sign if config use 16-bit ticks is defined within FreeRTOS config.h file. It will be 32-bit long without sign otherwise. Most significant 8 bits within this variable are called scontrol bits and are defined as event bits control bytes. Those are blocked for the control data passed via event functions. The role of the control bits is the following. Event wait for all bits means that we are waiting for all of the bits from the specified mask. If it is cleared, event flags will be satisfied if any of the bit from the mask will be set. Event unblocked due to bit set mask it means that once it is set it means that the task waiting for event flags has been unblocked due to its required bit matching not due to timeout. And the last one event clear events on exit bits it means that all bits within the masks will be cleared on successful exit of this function. So once the bit flag mask will be set. Let's have a look at some differences among different APIs concerning group events. In FreeRTOS this mechanism is called event group in CMC's OS version 1 it is not implemented and in CMC's OS version 2 which we are describing within this session it is called event flags. And as in other CMC's OS functions there is no different function for thread and IRQ execution. It is checked within the function and proper FreeRTOS API call is done. We will focus on CMC's OS version 2 of this implementation. So let's have a closer look at event flags. Let's have a look at attributes of event flags specified within OS event flags ATR underscore T type. It is defined within CMC's underscore OS 2.h file. The only one we need to specify manually is the name of the event flag. The rest like attribute bits pointer to the control block memory area and control block size will be filled automatically after creation of the object. How we need to create the flags objects. So for this we've got a dedicated function OS event flags new which is requiring from us one argument which is the pointer to the structure with the attributes of the event flags object we would like to create. In fact we can specify only the name so in case we don't want to spend time for this we just put null within the pointer and in this case the default values would be set. The function is turning back the handler to event flags which can be used later on to pass the event flags or to wait for them within other functions. To delete event flags we need to use the function OS event flags delete. It is requiring one argument which is the handler to event flags objects and it returns the variable OS status underscore T. If it's zero means that the function has been executed correctly, if it's minus it is if there is let's say some other value lower than zero it means that there's some errors occurred during this process. To set bitmask we need to call OS event flags set function it requires two arguments a handler to event flag and 32-bit value with event bitmask to be set. Please remember that we mustn't use highest 8-bit of this mask as those are reserved for the control bits. Setting bits in an event group is not deterministic operation because there are known number of tasks that may be waiting for the bit or bits being set. FreeR2S doesn't allow non-deterministic operations to be performed in interrupts or from critical sections therefore X event group set bits from ISR sent a message to the timer task to have the set operation performed in the context of the timer task where a schedule lock is used to place a for a critical section. To use this we need to enable X event group set bits from ISR within include parameters at freeR2S configuration. This is why if you would like to use event groups and you would like to set some event groups within interrupts you need to enable as well the software timers. To clear a mask there is a dedicated function OS event flags clear which requires two arguments handler of the event flag object and bit mask to be cleared. Please remember to not use highest 8 bits. In both cases functions return 32-bit signed value. It contains event flags content after the operation or in case of an error its code. This code could be OS error parameter which is the bit mask when the bit mask is not in proper size so for example we were trying to use the highest 8 bits and the second error code could be OS error resource in case the resource was not available. Both components have a negative value by origin because those are coming from OS status underscore t and in this case both are casted to unsigned 32 bits. To wait for specific bit mask within selected event flags object we need to call OS event flags wait function. It cannot be run from interrupt as it is blocking function and we cannot block the interrupt. Arguments we need to pass to these functions are the following event flags handler bit mask which the task is waiting for and options. Those options could be OS flags wait all it is one in hexadecimal and it means that we need to wait for all specified bits within the bit mask. The second option which can be or with the previous one is OS flags no clear. This is a 2 hexadecimal and it means that event flags bits should be not cleared on exit of this function. The last our fourth argument for this function is a maximum timeout in milliseconds to wait for the event flags being set. Function is returning unsigned 32 bit value which contains either event flags value in case of successful execution or the error code casted from int 32 bits into unsigned int 32 bits value and it can be one of the values. OS error isr in case of calling this function from interrupt which is not allowed. OS parameter error parameter in case of taking into account most significant 8 bits which are reserved for the control bits. OS error timeout in case event flags bit mask is not set within given timeout and OS error resource in case it was not possible to access event flags object. An important component within event flags and software timers which would be described in separate section is so called RTOS agent task. Originally it was used to execute software timer callback functions now it is used to other components like event flags. Its priority is set within config timer task priority. Its tag size is set within config timer task stack depth and it is necessary to define config use timers and include x timer and function call within free RTOS config.h file to generate this function. What is important is to set properly the especially the priority of this agent task to allow execution among other tasks which are active in the system. Otherwise it may happen that it will be blocked so our event flags would be not serviced properly within the system. Below there is an example of additional configuration of free RTOS .h file in order to use event flags from interrupts because this RTOS agent which we discussed on the previous slide is used mainly to service the event flags from interrupts. So in our example we need to define config use timers to 1 it means that it's enabled then config timer task priority by default it is 2 so once you create an example please unify this value to the priorities used in your example. Then a config timer queue length is set to 10 it has more importance so within software timers one you can have multiple software timers and then you need some queue to store the commands sent by various timers. In case of event flags it is not that important so we can keep the default value and then config timer task stack depth it's 256 which is quite enough for this and then we need to enable the include x timer and function call to enable it we need to set it to 1. Above configuration is enabled and forced by default one we are using CMC's OS version 2 but we need to enable everything when using for example CMC's OS version 1. Important message once again is to update the RTOS agent task priority within config timer task priority value versus other tasks priorities in the system so there would be a possibility to execute it. Thank you for watching this video.


So now you're here again knocking at my door it'll too late for I'm sorry for The lights went out cuz you kept cutting what's up you guys that are welcome back to my channel Thank you guys so much for joining me today So I have another true life series for you If you don't know anything about my true life series, please go take a look around my channel You can go to my true life playlist where I talk about various different professions and also I just feature other students and other individuals that are PAs currently Working in different specialties. So if you like what you see go ahead and subscribe Please you guys forgive my voice. I did a lot of yelling yesterday In terms of like playing taboo and you know saying no people are cheating So that's why I am a little bit hoarse But I had to get this video out for you guys because I am so excited about it So this video is going to be featuring Joan. She is a PA student in the UK I know the UK there are PAs in other places other than the US and Canada Which is dope and so that is why I wanted to bring This information to you all if you are interested in what it's like to be a PA in another country So that is what Joan is gonna be talking about. She is gonna be talking about her experience this far as a PA student in the UK So I'm excited. Please sit back, relax and without further ado, here is Joan Hello, my name is Joan Embola. I've just finished my first year as a PA student in the UK and this is my true life So I first heard about the PA profession through my university's website. Actually, I think it was through their YouTube channel This was back in 2016 when I was doing my undergrad degree at St. George's University in London Before that I had never heard about the course which is so funny because my university has been doing the course for the longest in the UK So they've been doing it for about 10 years. I think we are the 11th cohort So they've been doing it for a really long time and in 2016 was the first time I heard about the course when they posted a video in the YouTube channel and I Watched that video and I found it really interesting About these new healthcare professionals who are not doctors but then who work alongside doctors and nurses and other healthcare professionals to diagnose, treat and manage patients and pretty much from there my interest was Taken and I started to find out more about the course and do more research So I think over the last couple of years The PA profession has been made well known to more and more people are getting to know more about the course and and the profession and the role because more universities are starting to Do the course and offer the course and that means that more and more students are beginning to find out about the course and apply for it The course has been around the UK for quite a while I think since 2004 But people didn't know about it because they weren't that many PAs working in the UK But I think now because more universities like I said are training more students and more More students are getting qualified and sent to hospitals and GP surgeries more patients are being exposed to the role and We're being pioneers of the role, which is great It's very different from the US where it's very well established and it's been there for about 50 years in the UK I think majority of people don't know about the PA role, but I would say that more and more people are starting to find out So it is a postgraduate master's most people most universities offer it as a two-year postgraduate program so uh master's an msc or just a pg dip or postgraduate diploma So for two years, that's what it is So you'd have to have done an undergraduate degree for three years at least And then after that you can apply for the PA course So most people can do it straight after university like I did I applied straight after my undergrad and I got in and started the course But some people have been out of university for a long time and they've been they've been working In either the health sector or in the sector. That's completely different Some people have non-science backgrounds and they have some sort of experience with people and they can apply for the course So it is a postgraduate program Everyone who has done it has done a degree Most universities like I said offer it for a two-year program But some universities in the UK offer it as a four-year undergraduate program But that's not the norm. It's usually a two-year program I don't know if in terms of getting in so you do apply and then Most universities invite you for an interview So the different universities have different styles of interviews You can either have a multi-minute interview or a panel interview or you can have a Presentation that you have to present or group discussions Loads of different ways in which they interview PA students and then after that you get off of the place So at the moment to get into PA school, you don't have to do an admissions test, which is what Getting into medical school and requires you to do for most universities But it's purely just the application process the interview and then Getting an offer really So at the end of the program Every single PA student in the UK has to sit and pass the national exam So the national exam holds Most people that start in september usually do it in september at the end of their second year But then it holds throughout the year as well as the sum in january I think in march as well and it has two components. So it has a written component where You answer I think it's 150 questions for three hours I think that's what it is. Um, I might be wrong, but I think that's what it is And then you have the second component, which is called an oski So that's the clinical aspects of it where you have 14 stations and you have different stations and students go into each of these stations and they are tested on Different things so it could be a procedure like suturing or giving an injection Or it could be to perform a clinical examination Or it could be to take a history from a patient and then the examiner asked you questions So, yeah, there's the two components of it. The the written component is usually done in london while the um, The clinical component is done in liverpool. So that is that is what the um certification exam Requires you to do. I think you would be required to sit and pass this exam to be a qualified PA So the role of a PA in the UK is The fact that they work under the supervision of a consultant doctor that's a supervising doctor And um, they're all entails taking a history from patients being able to examine these patients other to come up with the differential diagnosis And also to come up with a management plan and to treat these patients as well So PAs can work in primary care So in GP surgeries GP practices or they can work in any specialty in secondary care as well And you can have some PAs as well in surgery So that is basically in a nutshell the scope of practice for PAs in the UK at the moment PAs aren't um allowed to prescribe or sign their own prescriptions and they're also not allowed to um Order ionizing radiations at the moment. So PAs in the UK. They can't sign their own prescriptions and they can't order Ionizing radiations. However, we are going to be regulated soon We're going to have our own regulatory body and hopefully when all of the process is set up and running We will be they will set up an exam for us to be able to write and get our prescription rights But at the moment PAs cannot sign their own prescriptions and they can't um order ionizing radiation So I think it just depends I'm going to walk you through quickly just a typical day in a week So Mondays we usually have communication skills So we go in and we're in different groups and we practice how to take a history from a patient And to come up with a differential diagnosis or how to explain a diagnosis to a patient Or how to explain the initiation of a treatment and then we have lectures Then on Tuesdays, we usually have what we call PBL, which is problem-based learning again We're in groups. So we come together. We have a case. We discuss the case Come up with some learning objectives and then we go go go home for a week Answer these questions and then come back and discuss the answers to questions Wednesdays in first year. We have placements. So GP placements once every week. So every Wednesday in first year Um, and then in second year at my university. We have hospital based placements all year Pretty much and then in first year as well Thursdays We usually have anatomy and then we have more physiology teaching and more lectures and then Fridays are for clinical skills So we clinical examination skills. We learn about I don't know taking a cardiovascular exam or upper neurological exam or PR exam and stuff like that. So that's basically a typical day from at my uni in first year and In second year, like I said, it's mainly placements all year So second replacements in hospitals all year. I know you said a day, but I thought a week would make more sense and the days usually consists from Us coming in at 9 a.m. And finishing at 4 or 5 p.m. So, yeah So I think the biggest challenge working as a PA in the UK would be Not necessarily the patients themselves being Skeptical about the role because I I think patients are generally very lovely from my experience from working In doing my placement in the GP practice whenever patients don't understand my role and I explain to them They're usually very accepting of the role um, but I have heard quite a few stories of PA students in hospital settings where Other healthcare professionals are a bit skeptical about the role because they don't really understand it They think that we're there to replace doctors while some healthcare professionals think that we're there to replace doctors They don't really understand fully what we do what our scope of practice is and all of that stuff So, um, I think one of the challenges could be is the fact that We almost will have to constantly have to prove ourselves and to prove the fact that you know Even though we've learned 80 percent of the knowledge even though we've learned 80 percent of the The stuff that doctors have learned in five years in like less than half the time We are still qualified to deal with patients and to make, you know, clinically sound decisions I think it would the challenge would be constantly having to prove yourself to other healthcare professionals To make them know that you you are, you know, um competent to do your job Um, but because I've had like I said, I've had brilliant experiences with patients themselves But it's it's the I feel like the most challenging thing for me that I would find is working With other healthcare professionals as well and being in a team that is supportive of your role And a team that knows exactly what you're there for and they know your limitations And that's ready to support you really the main thing I'm looking forward to really is just the patient The patient interaction side of it unlike doctors who get to progress um Going up to higher levels in their career and or some of them getting to consult in the positions where they have less clinical contact with patients I love the pa role because I can stay in a job or in a specialty as as long as I want to and if I don't Like that anymore. I can just move to another specialty so I love the flexibility of the role and I love the fact that um, I get that I'm guaranteed that patient contact Throughout all of my career, which is what I enjoy about working in healthcare And I don't want to lose that and I I'm really looking forward to spending time with patients and Yeah Yes, my course director so for my university she trained in the u.s And she moves to the uk and she's been working in the uk For a long time now and also we have loads of other american pa's on our course So yes, they can move from the from the from america to the uk and work as a pa I've only noticed american pa's working in the uk. I don't think I've noticed any other pa's I'm not sure of any other pa's from other countries can work in the uk But I know americans can um the downside to all this is that uk pa's can't work in america Which I think is rather unfortunate um But yeah, I think that the system is quite different between the uk and america and in terms of your certification exams as well So I guess that's why there's that limitation. But yes american pa's can work in the uk Yes, I think that the pa role promises a very very big turn like very big Change and a very big help to the the the national health service Um, I don't know if you guys are aware of it But the nhs or the national health service is the health care system here in the uk for many years now It's been struggling. It's been overstretched. Um, there's this short short staffed. Um, the the services heavily short staffed and loads of trust and hospitals are suffering, you know devastating Consequences because of this and I feel like the pa role is perfect because Its aim is not to take away from other health care professionals. It's to train um people who are who aren't already in the health care profession to go in and to help elevate this Load that's been placed on doctors whilst working within the limitation of their of their role and their knowledge And their training and I feel like this will help a lot in terms of providing that continuity of care Because I think it's very very important for the patients because it's it's good for patients to always have That person there who can who knows how things work rather than having doctors coming in and going the next day or Going round and round in circles and you know, and that's what the doctor life is because doctors tend to rotate between specialties But if you have someone there e.g. The pa's who have been there for a long time They know how things work. They know how the system works It provides a continuity of care and I feel like that is the main reason why the pa role was introduced in the uk Is very very good for patient-centered care Which the uk health care system seeks to provide and I think that's going to that has the potential to change um To make the nhs a better service and to help self the serve the patients I just want to say that um pa school is hard I have finished my first year and that was a roller coaster ride A massive roller coaster ride filled with so many ups and downs um It is hard, but it is very possible And I feel like my faith has been tested on so many different levels during the past year during this course and um The one thing that I learned from doing this course is the fact that I cannot rely on my own strength to do anything. I have constantly had to rely on god and um to help me pull me through this past year and It's just to know that you can do it. It is hard, but it's not impossible You can do it and if loads of people have done it before you then, you know You just need to keep encouraging yourself Putting your hope and your trust in god and holding on to the fact that he has brought you through it And he will bring you till the end and yeah, so it is hard But god is with you so you can do it If I could pull through then I'm sure you can too. So don't be discouraged. Keep going It's hard, but the end will be rewarding John thank you so much for all of that information. I mean I learned a lot. Did y'all learn a lot? I know y'all learned a lot because I learned a lot. Okay I think it's so dope that as a PA in the u.s You can leave the us if you so choose and you want a different kind of scenery You can go to the uk and still work With your license and that is pretty dope I mean I think that that is something that you should be aware of like your scope of practice in other countries and how that may You know how you could transition so thank you so much for sharing that information with me And with my viewers because I'm pretty sure we did not know about that I know I didn't also I really liked what you said when you said not your will but his because only by god's grace Could we make it through PA school and you know life in general? So thank you so much for sharing that you guys Please please please go give her some love check out her youtube channel her instagram follow her subscribe and Also, um, just leave a comment in the comment section below of any other profession that you may want me to Feature or any other true life series video ideas that you may have please leave that in the comment section below Oh my gosh, Joan I do also want to say huge congrats to you for completing didactic gear and making it to clinical year That is a huge feat in and of itself and I am so happy for you I wish you many blessings on your continued journey. Thank you guys so much for watching I really appreciate each and every one of you If you haven't already done so go ahead and like this video Leave that comment below and follow me on instagram at adana the pa and thank you guys so much for watching I will talk to you guys next time. Bye Thank you so much adana for this amazing opportunity to be a part of this documentary I know this is not part of the video but I just want to say thank you. Thank you so much Have a lovely day and god bless