According to Jung, there are four functions of consciousness or four ego functions. Two of them he called rational functions and two of them he called irrational or I would call them non-rational functions. So the two rational functions are thinking and feeling which is, from a Jungian point of view, those are the ways in which we establish values and make decisions. So feeling may be a more subjective orientation to valuing and decision making, but it is rational, absolutely as rational as what we think of as thinking. And the two non-rational functions are sensation and intuition. Sensation is just what you think it is, touch, sight, hearing, taste, and hands-on kinds of things of what needs to be done right now, and intuition is what we're going to talk about, but they are ways of getting information, they're just not cognitive. So here we are talking about our subjective decision making process, which from a Jungian point of view is feeling, and then this way of taking in information and what we do with it from an intuitive place.


فشرف بل اشتغالي بالعلم ولا تبغي به ما عشت يا بدا بدا وياله من شراف عظيم الحمد لله رب العالمين له الحمد الحسن والثناء الجميل وأشد أن لا إله إلا الله وحده لا شريك له يقول الحق وهو يهد السبيل وأشد أن سيدنا ونبينا محمد صلى الله عليه وعليه وعلى آله وأصحابه والتابعين لهم بإحسان إلى يوم الدين أما بعد أحب بدا أخواني نحن في المساعدة من الكتاب ثلاثة الأصول رتنا بشيخ الإسلام محمد إبن عبد الوهاب رحبه الله تعالى نحن قبل نتحدث عن ثلاثة عبادات ونحن now إن شاء الله تعالى ثلاثة عبادات أول أحد هو الدعاة ونحن نتحدث عن الخوف ثلاثة أحدة التي نتحدث عنها هو الرجاء ونحن today إن شاء الله تعالى سنذهب إلى النوع الرابع the fourth type من أنواع العبادة from the types of عبادات that the sheikh رحمه الله يخبر and it is التوكل reliance the author رحمه الله محمد إبن عبد الوهاب رحمه الله رحمة الوالسعة he says ودليل التوكل the evidence of توكل is قوله تعالى the statement of Allah وعلى الله فتوكل إن كنتم مؤمنين it is upon Allah rely if you are true believers وقوله and also the statement of Allah ومن يتوكل على الله فوحسبه anyone who relies on الله تعالى Allah is enough for him سبحانه وتعالى so the author brought those two verses to prove the evidence of relying on Allah تباركا وتعالى so the question that arises is what does توكل mean so we are going to define توكل لغة وصطلاحة technically and technically لنوستيكلي دوال توكل is مزدر توكل يتوكل ومأخوذ من مادة وكل التي تدل على اعتباد على الغير في أمر الماء دوال توكل is the مزدر the verbal noun of توكل يتوكل and it is taken from the root word وكل التي تدل that shows على اعتماد and it shows لنوستيكلي relying the word اعتماد means to rely على الغير other than yourself or someone else or something else في أمر ماء a matter in a particular matter maybe but it is to rely on someone or something other than yourself that's what it means لنوستيكلي that is what it means لنوستيكلي and of course the word الوكيل الوكيل is اسم من اسماء الله الحسنة it's a name from the righteous and noble names of Allah سبحانه وتعالى and the word الوكيل has come in the Quran مرات العديدة many times and the scholars they give many different meanings to the word الوكيل what it means so it is the name of Allah but there are also a lot of meaning that are given to it some of the scholars they say that the word الوكيل the name of Allah when they explain what it means they say it's a حفظ the protector لكم that's what الوكيل بأموركم the one who takes over your affairs also شريكا a partner with you in your affairs you don't run your affairs by yourself he runs it with you and that's the speech of مجاهد ملجبري and others have said others so ولذلك محمد أمين شقيقي in his أضواء البيان في إضاح القرآن بالقرآن to third volume يجعوها إلى شيء واحد he says the meanings that have been used regarding the word الوكيل which is a name from the names of Allah سبحانه وتعالى it goes back to one particular thing which is من يتوكل عليه وتوفوظ الأمور إليه ليأتي بالخير ويتفع الشر he says it is the one who is relied on it is the one whose matters are surrendered to him why ليأتي بالخير so he can bring good ويتفع الشر and that he can repel and get rid of evil from us and he says وهذا لا يصح إلا لله وحدة and that's only for Allah وتعالى so this is the meaning that it goes back to the meaning that it goes back to is من يتوكل عليه وتوفوظ الأمور إليه ليأتي بالخير ويتفع تكنله is الحاول في عام جامعawlوم والحكم جامع Perhaps They are at في بعض المشاهدة ويقوله في 409 فالتالي 497 ويقوله 409 فهي مجموعة مختلفة فالتالي يقوله ويقوله ويقوله ويقوله ويقوله إنه ستق اعتماد القلب على الله عز وجلا في استجلاب المصالح ودفع المضارض من أمور الدنيا والآخرة وكلة الأمور كلها إليه وتحقيق الإيمان بأنه لا يعطي ولا يمنع ولا يضر ولا ينفع سواه إنه جميل ومنطقة جداً ومنطقة جداً الإمام الجرجاني رحمه الله يزبقوا التعريفات رقم 74 يقول التوكل يعني هو الثقة بما عند الله وليأس عما في أيد الناسي وهي أيضاً another good definition يقول التوكل هو الثقة بما عند الله يجب أن يؤمن تق means what it's to ask to trust and believe بما عند الله ذلك which is with الله تبارك وتعالى وليأس عما في أيد الناسي and it's also to give up on everything that's in the hands of the creation you really don't build trust within people's hands you know it doesn't last you know it can cut you know there's yes but within Allah's hands you know it does not stop صح that's what it means according to الإمام الجرجاني رحمه الله يزبقوا so those two إن شاء الله يزبقوا التعالى are what are what mentions the importance of it the truth of the matter is brothers and sisters if a person takes now that we've defined it if the person takes أخذ بالأسباب he takes the means he takes the means and he comes with the means this does not get rid of and it doesn't eradicate the تواكل in any way, form or shape rather what it does is that it completes your تواكل it completes your تواكل وليدارك ابن القيم رحمه الله على علام ابن القيم رحمه الله he says something very powerful so I'm gonna read his statement on you he says very strong powerful statement he says تواكل is from the greatest means in which a person can gain what they are looking for and also harm is eradicated and it's repelled through a تواكل فمن أنكر الأسبابة but the person who rejects the means who rejects the means لم يستق معه تواكل your تواكل will not be upright you will not come with تواكل as it should be ولكن but من تمام تواكل from the complete manners of a تواكل is عدم الركون إلى الأسبابة is that you don't really rely on the means you don't وقطر علاقة القلب بها and that you cut your heart and you come with unravelling conviction in the means that you've come forward with فيكونوا حال قلبي قيامه بالله لا بها so your situation is that the person's heart stands up for Allah تباركة وتعالى and not the means so that's very powerful كلامة ويبلو القيام رحمه الله وتعالى and that my beloved brothers and sisters is what distinguishes between التواكل والتواكل this is where the difference comes the difference comes between التواكل والتواكل which is coming with تواكل which we defined and we explain what it means and the تواكل which is actually the opposite of a تواكل is when the person does not come with the means that are required from them are you with me brothers and تواكل which means coming with the means is exactly what the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم has urged the companions to do and has very large amount of hadiths and ayat from the Quran actually proves that Islam is about taking the means for example let's take the hadith by الامام أحمد and his musnad الامام الترميدي and his sunan they narrated the sunan and also الامام النسائي who brings it in his cobra and other than him بسند صحيح the chain of narration is authentic من حديث عمر من الخطاب فمن حديث عمر رضي الله which he said that the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم has said لو أنكم تتواكلون على الله حقة تواكله لرزقكم كما يرزق الطير تغدو خماصا و تروح بطانا if you guys rely on Allah حقة تواكله the way he deserves to be rely on لرزقكم الله would have provided for you كما يرزق الطير the way he provides for the bed تغدو خماصا ممعنة تغدو خماصا it means that it leaves in the morning خماصا means بطورها فارغة its stomach is empty there's nothing in it و تروح بطانا و تروح بطانا و تروح means here it comes back بطانا here means رزق الله الله provided it for us it goes it leaves with an empty stomach and it comes back with a what a full stomach now let's look at the bed's reliance the bed did not just sit around and not do anything rather it left in the morning the narration mentions تغدو خماصا are you with me brothers و لذلك that's why the believer he leaves in the morning and he doesn't sit around he does everything in the morning you find Muslims who are sleeping in the morning they pray فجر even if they do pray فجر إنه الله some of them don't even pray فجر but the believer wakes up early morning and when he wakes up early morning what does he do he goes out and looks for his risk as if he's not a student of knowledge or what not he's out there and he's getting his risk و لذلك there's a statement which is attributed to the prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم but it's not authentic which is that بوركة أمتي ببخورها my umma blessing has been placed in it for it in the morning like in the meaning no doubt is correct in the meaning is correct that the person should leave in the morning go out there to look for the رزق الله تباركة و تعالى and are you with me brothers that's the time when طالب علم in the morning where he benefits from he memorizes are you with me one of the things that are mentioned in the book تعليم العلم والمتعلم by زرنوجي is that he says خذ حرفاً و قل ألفاً خذ حرفاً و قل ألفاً this is the كلام which the علماء they transmitted from one after the other I don't know who's the first person to say it but what it means is that take a word meaning take a word but repeat and utter it a thousand times repetition to memorize right طالب علم he takes the word meaning don't take a lot of word don't take a lot of information take one حديث take a quote take two, three if it is but repeat it a thousand times and what time is it that the person does that he does it in the morning و لذلك when he was asked what are the things that increase a person's memorization how can a person gain memorization what did he say he says he said بالتكرار و ايدامة النظر بالتكرار و ايدامة النظر the way that a person can gain knowledge is repetition to repeat and is to consistently look over over the مسائل and the matters which he has learned so this is all in the morning and if the person is a person who is running after the dunya and wants to gain a dunya and of course he has good intention for it he's got good intentions but he's working he's got that job should be done in the morning and the person should get a job in the morning so the bad look at it it came with the asbab it came with the means it left in the morning it went out and then it came back in the evening or the afternoon and when it came back it came back with a full stomach and not only that it came back for رزق for his children so the bad didn't sit around so the prophet is telling us this is what this is actually what تواكل means and of course it goes with the ayah و ما من دابة في الارض إلا على الله رزقها و يعلم مستقرها و مستودعها كلهم في كتاب المبين that every single riding beast on the face of this earth which you see its provision is upon الله تبارك وتعالى الله provides for it سبحانه وتعالى and Allah is the one who gives رزق and provision it but the animals are not going to sit around a lion is not going to sit around I wait for Allah to provide for it so then why you as a human who's meant to be more smart than the animal not be one who comes with with the means صح و لذلك if you look here ماريما بنت عمران are you with me brothers ماريما الله say سبحانه وتعالى فأجاء المخاض إلى جنع النخلة قالت يا ليتني مت قبل هذا و كنت نسيا من سيا when the time of birth came to her and she was about to give birth are you with me what is it and she's and every one of us here understands the situation of a woman who's giving birth the matter is not easy it's actually a hard and a tough time ماريما بت عمران what did Allah تبارك وتعالى tell her to do she wants to nourish herself she wants to eat she realized that Allah تبارك وتعالى she also comes with the means look what Allah says to her what does Allah say to her و هوزي إليكي بجدع النخلة تساقط عليك رطم الجنية it's not just going to come Allah can just say when Allah tells her move the tree from the root shake it and all of these are going to come falling on you are you with me it's all going to fall on to you why didn't Allah تبارك وتعالى just tell her to sit down and relax don't worry I will bring the dates for you it will come into your palm but this is not going to come to you unless you work for it the same is what with نبي الله عيوب when his illnesses was external and internal he was sick inside and he was sick are you with me in the sense where his illness reached inside him internally in his in his internal parts of his organs and he was also sick from outside as it's mentioned in his سيرا هي دا and he called her تبارك وتعالى he said إني مساني الضرو أنت أرحم الراحمين هام has touched me and you are the most بسفو أولا و دل الله تبارك وتعالى نبي الله عيوب و دل الله أقول to him أركف بريجي لك هذا مغتسل مارد و شراب الله يخبره تبارك تبارك يجب أن تأتي من الله لا تبارك يجب أن تبارك الله كان سبحانه وتعالى لكنه يذهب أتواكل يجب أن تأتي يجب أن تأتي يجب أن تأتي لك أن ترى النظام لذا this is the difference between أتواكل وتواكل تواكل is عدم الأخذي من الأسباب the person doesn't take the means are you there brothers? he just relies on the goal and that is it's dim-wittiness it doesn't rationally and logically make sense so how would Islam a religion that does not go against the sound rationality does not go against the sound mind how would it be a religion that tells you to sit around and that everything will come to you it's not like that ولي ذلك the Prophet عليه الصلاة والسلام look at this look at this my beloved brothers and sisters the Hadith that's very well known which is حديث معاد أبن جبل the Prophet عليه الصلاة والسلام يقول يا معاد تدري ما حق الله على العباد معاد do you know the rights of Allah this Hadith is a Muslim يا معاد do you know the rights of Allah upon the creation وما حقوا العباد على الله and the right of the creation over Allah الله is the one who placed the responsibility and the rights on himself regarding his creation is the one who placed on himself no one placed on him سبحانه وتعالى من لطفي ورحمة he comes from his mercy on his tenderness on his kindness سبحانه وتعالى so Allah says to him do you know this معاد do you know what it is قال أبعاد أبعاد responded by saying الله ورسوله أعلم الله in his messenger now then the Prophet عليه وسلم he said فإن حق الله بهي شيئا وحقوا العباد على الله عز وجل الله يعذب بلا يشتك بهي شيئا the rights of Allah سبحانه وتعالى on his creation is what that they worship him alone and they do not associate partners with him and the rights of the creation that Allah placed on himself no one placed on him is that that he won't punish them if they don't associate partners with him then معاد said يا رسول الله أفلاقوا بشروا الناس should I not give them a glad hiding should I not go out there and tell the people the Prophet عليه وسلم responded the Prophet of Allah responded by saying to him لا تمشيرهم don't give them a glad hiding regarding this فأتكيروا they're going to rely on it فأتكيروا they're going to rely on it so this my beloved brothers and sisters is what قعيدة جنيلة it's a powerful principle the Prophet teaching us here and what's that principle which he's teaching us ترك العمل leave enough actions is not what the Sharia wants you to do the people might rely on this goal and leave off actions ولي ذلك also there's another narration another حديث which الإمام مسلم narrated and that is أبو هوريرا أبو هورير رضي الله يتعالع عنه went out to tell the people remember the narration أبو هوريرا رضي الله يتعالع عنه went to give glad hiding to the people the one who says إلا الله is going to enter Jannah based on who's come on the Prophet عليه الصلاة والسلام then عمر رضي الله عنه physically hurt أبو هوريرا and he brought أبو هوريرا to the Prophet and he said to the Prophet يا رسول الله بأبي أنت و أمي I free my mother for you أبعت أبا هوريرا تبين عليك did you say أبو هوريرا with your shoe and did you say to him ملقيا يشهد ألا إله إلا الله مستقيما بها قلبه بشره بالجنة give him the glad hiding of Jannah is that what you said قالا نعم the Prophet said yes I did say that to him I said to him if you meet anyone and that comes in front of you and you meet them who testifies that there's none worthy of worship except الله تباركة و تعالى and his heart is dead fast upon that upright بشره بالجنة give him the glad hiding of Jannah did you send him out أبو هوريرا أمر أس the Prophet said yes I did then أمر دانسا أفعلت if you didn't do that I'm saying to him أخشا أن يتكين الناس عليها I'm scared that the people may rely on this the people are sick amongst them are sick people and they may rely on it فخليهم يعملون I'm asking you to leave them and let them do the actions that come with it I'm asking you to make an agreement with أمر و داني سيء فخليهم يعملون okay leave the people so what's taken from this what's taken from this حديث is that and the حديث before it is that the word التواكل and اتكال both of them which are the same it means is when the person doesn't come with the actions and doesn't come with the means that are needed from them it's عدم العملي و عدم الأخذيب الأسلام and that as we can see brothers is not what أن ذلك ليس من التواكل في شيء that has nothing to do with التواكل it has nothing to do with what التواكل and it is not the تواكل which Allah refers to in the verses that the author brought و من يتوكل على الله فوحسبه the one who relies on Allah Allah is enough for him that's not the that person hasn't come with the تواكل and that person hasn't come with the تواكل which Allah says و عليه فليتوكل اين كنتمؤمنين and upon Allah rely if you are true believers you haven't trust you haven't you haven't and also و في السماء رزقكم و ما توعدون فو رب السماء والأرض إنه لحق متلما أنكم تمتقون all of those verses which Allah says your provision is in my hands it does not mean that you sit around and you say Allah is going to provide for for me that Allah is going to provide for me and here this issue that we are talking about which is تواكل my beloved brothers and sisters تواكل is عبادة قلبية عمل قلب it's an action of the heart لا يتموا الإيمان والعبد ايباس إيمان will not be complete إلا إذا حققها unless he comes with it the way he should unless he comes with it و لذلك look at the ayah the author brought و على الله upon Allah فتوكلوا rely إن كنتمؤمنين if you are believers so the تواكل is mentioned next to us إيمان so your إيمان will not be true إن حقيقة إيمان the true essence of إيمان what it is you are not going to come with it unless you unless you come with تواكل reliance based on the definition that we gave regarding it right based on how we defined it but what is also notable and that we need to bring to your attention is the ayah what does it do it says و على الله فتوكلوا the جار and the مجرور have been placed the thing that is connected to the thing that is what connected to which is what فتوكلوا فتوكلوا rely upon Allah upon Allah is connected to reliance صحيح so the جار and the مجرور the حرف جر which is على and the word جلالة Allah both of them which is جار and مجرور are both connected to فتوكلوا but what happened و على الله and the Arabic principle is what تقديموا ما حقه تأخير يفيد الحصر if you place something that should have been delayed if you take it forward and you place it forward it shows exclusivity it shows exclusivity in other words what it shows here right now is that don't rely on anybody except who الله تبارك و تعالى if you are true believers if you are true believers if you are true believers and then the ayah that the author brought it shows اخلاص التوقل sincerity in التوقل and that you don't associate anyone with Allah تعالى in it in it are you with me about this because a lot of the times we see especially in this time that we're living especially in the back in Africa and countries like that in Asia Pakistan India Somalia and other countries like that people don't come with the means and they have this so-called supposed توقل which is in reality as we said it is التوقل and it is and it is not the توقل which we are referring to there like that they sit around they don't do nothing and they say Allah is going to provide and this is what it's a it's a revelation from Shaytan but countries like this the west the opposite is the truth which is what they rely on the means the people have placed their hearts اعتباد they fully rely on the means are you there how do you know if he loses his job he thinks of committee suicide he becomes suicidal and he wants to throw himself off a bridge he wants to take tablets which kill him his whole life becomes tight if his bills doesn't come through are you there if his bills doesn't come through or something happens or whatever what happens to him he lives in depression anxieties distress so the توقل he are my brothers the ayah refuted both refuted both the ones who rely on the means it says وعلى الله فتوكلوا rely on الله إن كنت مؤمنين and it is it is also refuted the people didn't come with the what the ones who left of actions and left of the means how did it refuted him a salat in the first point first first point they haven't even come with the توقل when they came with the توقل and the ayah used وعلى الله فتوكلوا إن كنت مؤمنين and then if you look at the religion of al-Islam is bayna what it is it is it's between واتفريط واتفريط it is نجلي جنس and extremeism الاسلام sits in between the two of them it doesn't go overboard by relying on the means and fully having full reliance on the means and they also don't نغلق they do not neglect coming with the means they know the means قد it could happen and توقل the means could be what it could be disabled it could be disabled are you there look at it for example we know in the Quran that the fire burns we know that something that doesn't have to be proven it's empirical right the fire burns is something which is معصوص is now بالضرورة it's out of necessity the child that's born has an innate ability to understand that the fire burns you don't need to teach him مع ذلك قد توقل it got disabled for the will of Ibrahim it's a means to burn مع ذلك this means got what disabled are you with me so it could happen that the means could be disabled are you there brothers how many people have done things that kill they killed they fell off a 40 storage building while they take a poison مع ذلك حياء they're more alive than you are يمشون على what you are they're walking on the face of this earth so the issue is is that the asbab the means you don't rely on them you rely on Allah و تعالى but there is a hadith by beloved brothers and sisters which is if I could say it's one of the beautifullest hadith that I have covered regarding this particular issue which is the توقل reliance it has come أنا الإمام البخاري narrated in his صحيح من حديث أبي هريرة رضي الله تعالى عنه based on the hadith of أبو هريرة رضي الله تعالى عنه but before I mention this hadith this powerful hadith which I will إن شاء الله تعالى there's a statement I missed and I want to bring it to your attention إن شاء الله تعالى and that's a statement said by سعيد من الجميع the great student of عبد الله إمن عباس رضي الله تعالى عنه he said something about توقل because remember we brought the ayah و على الله فتوقلوا إن كتم مؤمنين سعيد من الجميع said that the توقل is what التوقل جماع الإيمان توقل is the the jima'a the final overall conclusion of the man that's what he said سعيد من الجميع and that is supported مصداقه قوله تعالى it goes hand in hand and is backed by قوله تعالى و على الله فتوقلوا إن كتم مؤمنين so if a person his reliance in Allah is weak his reliance in Allah is weak there's a deficiency in his what he's iman it's a deficiency in his iman لأن عمل القلب and action of the heart is weak here at this particular point but let's go back to the hadith that I said that was very powerful in this particular situation and this hadith إن شاء الله و تعالى shows us how powerful the true believers الله the righteous people how their توقل is like this hadith as I said it's narrated in the most authentic book after the book of Allah سبحانه و تعالى and that is what صحيح المخاري on the authority of Abu Huraira رضي الله و تعالى عنه so this hadith this story that I'm going to tell you guys is a go to be of what و قلبه authentic authentic لأن the Prophet ﷺ he tells us a story أنه ذكر رجلا من بني إسرائيلة السألة بعض بني إسرائيلة أي يسلفه إلفة ديلاعي this is the story of the people of بني إسرائيل which were the previous nations the Prophet is telling us a story about them and as you know the Prophet ﷺ said إن لده حديث حديث عبن إسرائيلة و لحرج talk about the people of إسرائيل but there is no harm in it and the other narration the Prophet ﷺ says that in the story of the people of بني إسرائيل there is wisdom and there are lessons in their lives so it's an amazing انظروا أنه ممتعاً انه ذكرة رجلاً من بري إسرائيلة اللي فكرة صلى الله عليه وسلم قلتنا عن أحد من الناس من بري إسرائيل هل تعلمين من هو إسرائيل عليه السلام بري إسرائيل إسرائيل زعقوب إذا الله سبحانه وتعالى يتكلمون عن صورت عليه إمران كل الطعام كان حل اللي بني اللي بي كل الطعام كل الطعام كان حل اللي بني إسرائيلة إلا ما حرم إسرائيل على نفسي من قبل أن تنزل التورا إسرائيل هي إذن يعقوب عليه السلام إذن ذلك يقول بني إسرائيل يعني بني إسرائيل أنه ذكرة رجلاً من بني إسرائيلة للمان من بني إسرائيل سأل بعض بني إسرائيل يسأل بعض الناس إذا كان إسرائيل أنه يسأل أنه يسأل ويسأل ألف دينار إذا كان إسرائيل ألف دينار وكذلك تعرفوا أنه دينار دينار هو ماذا هو دينار هو دينار هو سلوة لذا ليس مخطئ يسأل لك مجرد من المال لذا المال يقول لك إتيني بشهاداء أشهدهم أخبرني أخبرني أخبرني يمكنك أن تستفق لك يمكنك أن تستمني يخبرني بأنك كفال بيلاهي شهيدا الله is enough لأخبرك الله is enough يقول أخبرني أخبرني كفالة هو ماذا أخبرني يمكنك أن تكون مالك في مجردك وكفالة وكفالة وكفالة هو كفال بيلاهي كفيلا الله is enough لأخبرني لأنهم كانوا إيمان وكفالة فطراء وكفالة أخبرني صدقتي لكي تقول الحق كفال بيلاهي شهيدا الله is enough for you as a witness وكفال بيلاهي كفيلا وكفال بيلاهي كفيلا فهي اخبرته فهي دفعه عليه على أجل مسمن وكفالا وكفالا وكفالا وكفالا وكفالا وكفالا ولكن هذا ليس جيدا وقارجة في البحر فقط عن حاجته في البحر فقط عن حاجته ليس قاعدة يجبو يحضر زيادة انتظر؟ وانتظر؟ وانتظر لفتحه وماذا يفعله؟ ثم التمسى مركبا يركبها يقدم عليه للأجل الذي أجله فلم يجد مركبا اما مركبا ماذا حدث هو هذا الانتظار؟ انه فعله و now came the time where he had to pay back the money he had to pay back the money to the man who took it from so when he tried to find a ship or something to take are you with me brothers? a ship to take to go to the individual in which he gave the money to sorry he took the money from he never he couldn't find a ship because he's on the other side of the sea and this man is on the other side of the sea so he's trying to look for a ship or a boat or whatever it is that he can take to go to the other side to give this man his money the time is up now he has to give it to him فلم يجد مركبا he couldn't find something to ride on فأخذ قشابة فنقرها فأدخل فيها الف دينار as he waited and waited and nothing came he found a wood a piece of wood and he sliced it and he placed inside the wood the الف دينار that was given to him he placed inside there and he placed a letter in there و صحيفة تدمينه and he wrote a letter and he placed a letter in there إلى صحيبي to the person in which he gave the money the one that gave him the money ثم زججة موضوعه ثم أتبه إلى البحري now pay attention here when he did that the log he placed it this is not money that's five pounds six pounds seven pounds this is actually a years provision for some people now what he's doing is that he places it inside a log which he saw on the sea he then pushes it after he wrote a letter are you with me? and then he pushes it and this is what he says اللهم إنك تعلموا أني كنت ثلفت فلانا الف دينار فسألني كفيلا the other man on the other side made this draw not the one who gave the money the other man are you there who gave the money to the other one who's on the other side he's waiting he's waiting for the guy to come he's waiting for him on the other side of the sea hoping when is the guy who I gave him the money when is he gonna come so it gets dark nothing's coming so he says something to Allah he says اللهم إنك تعلموا أني كنت سلفت فلانا الف دينار oh Allah you know you know that I landed thousand dinar to a man who asked me for it and I asked him so this dua sorry my beloved brothers this dua is coming from the man who gave the money so the man who took the money the man who took the money he's the one who's making this dua he says oh Allah you know that a man gave a thousand dinar فسألني كفيلا a man had given me a thousand dinar are you there he asked me for a kafil and I said Allah is my kafil and he became pleased with that and he asked me for a witness فقلت I said كفى بالله شيدا Allah is enough for me فراضية بذلك and that man became pleased with that وإني جهدت أن أجد مركبا and I strove hard and I put my effort and hard work in making sure that I go to him and then I meet him that I can give him his money فلم أجد I could not find anybody or anything to take to go to him وإني أستو دعوك وإني أستو دعوك وهو يأك during camp فرما في البحر and they threw the log into the sea حتى ولاج著ت فيه until the water took its and it waves cause its waves were coming تم Parent و Hispanic وaki be it وي Mary ولاج وأص colour ويان I suppose I said I found something I didn't and I stayed وضع يخرجوا إلى بلدي. بعد ذلك he still didn't leave the place. He still didn't leave the place. He waited for a boat. Still wants to take a boat. The other man on the other side is waiting for his. He's waiting for what? He's waiting for the boat to come or something since the man might be in this one. And his wealth might be here. Are you there? So as he, they say the narration, Abu Qari mentions that. Some of the narration and some of the stories mentioned that the man he waited for so long and he got dark and he said you know Subhan Allah nothing has come. I don't know what to do. Let me just at least take this log to my family to burn it so food as I think we can cook food from it. We can use this log as a form of burning it and make food for my family from it. And then guess what? When he opened the log he had found inside the log inside the log the elf Dinar he found inside it and he found a letter that was in it. Are you there? So he found his thousand Dinar and he also found a letter that explained everything to him. The other one on the other side strove so hard and he put every effort that he could. Are you there? In finding a what? A ship. So he found a ship. He came to the destination. Are you there? And at this particular point what does he have with him? He has the elf Dinar. He still wants maybe the other one didn't get to the man. So when he came and he met the man who lent him the money and they met each other. He said to him I tried hard. I gave every effort there was to come to you in time but I couldn't. And he apologized and the man said to him. The man said to him. Are you there? The man said to him in response. He said to him Allah paid it off from you. And that which you have placed inside the log has reached us. It's from صرف بالألف Dinar.  Go back. Allah has paid it off from you. Allah has paid it off from you. You don't have to give us anything. This shocks me because how the first one relied on Allah. And he knew Allah will not forsake him. But he also came with the means. Look how he still strove to make sure that he comes. This is the true meaning of توقل. What also shocks me is that the other one who got the money didn't lie about the money. And didn't say I didn't get no money. But he was honest and we sincere about it. And he told his brother I got the money. Allah had paid it from you. و تعالى. We are going to carry on this point of توقل. We haven't finished yet. To have more understanding of it. So we're going to carry on. Bring more narrations and some more issues. Paying into it. I want to speak about مواطن التوقل. And next lesson. Anything which I have said that was wrong. Incorrect mistake. Then it is from me and Shaytan. And Allah and his messenger are free from it. سبحانك الله وبحمدك. أشهد أن لا إله إلا الله. أستغفرك وأتوب إلي.


What do I love about the web? What do I love about the web? What do I love about the web? What do I love about the web? Cat videos. I love web, I code web, I teach web and web is everything. I can put my imagination to work. Constantly learn. And there are always new technologies to experiment with. It helps you to understand other people, other cultures around the world. It allows us to build great experiences. It was meant for everyone. It's been a big part of my life since I sent my first email back to my grandparents after my mom and I immigrated to the US. You can never stop playing. There's always new things to create. The applications are absolutely infinite. It's very accessible. Massive adoption of web apps makes me love the web more. Artistic. Connectivity. Variety. Accessibility. Easy. Innovation. Amazing. The people. That's what I love about the web.


Hi and welcome to the session. Let us discuss the following question. Question says, for the given solid the three views are given. Identify for each solid the corresponding top, front and side views. Now the given solid is a matchbox. If you see this matchbox from the top, then you are able to see this rectangle. So we can say this figure represents the top view of the given solid. Note that picture of fish is present on this rectangle. So top view of this matchbox is represented by this rectangle. Now if you see this matchbox from the front, then you are able to see this rectangle. So here this rectangle represents the front view of the given matchbox. Clearly you can see this figure represents the front view of this rectangle. Now see the matchbox from the side. You are able to see this rectangle. So side view is represented by the first part. Note that this rectangle has the black shaded portion. So if we see it from side, then we can see this rectangle only and this black shaded portion. So we have drawn the rectangle and the black shaded portion here to represent the side view. Now our required answer is first part represents the side view of the given matchbox. Second part represents the front view of the given matchbox. And third part represents the top view of the given matchbox. So this completes the session. Hope you understood the solution. Take care and bye for now.


tage because the thing that gave us that long-term path from a u.s standpoint of interconnected networks and an internet in the and private industry that that we're building for the world was a remarkable amount of power and and access and um just ability to control things and i think as we start putting pressure on that and separating and saying no no no we don't want to be part of the world we're going to take away that long-term influence and so we have to think about that balance in pretty significant ways because i think it will um it actually is kind of where we're moving and we're not we're kind of moving in fits and starts no one really has quite figured that out yet yeah i think it's a little bit um to be determined on where we go with industrial policy obviously we have the chips act which is a massive amount of funding uh that's supporting the development of of semiconductor manufacturing here in a number of places in the united states and we'll see where where that goes beyond that we don't have a lot of additional industrial policy things of the of the size of the of the chips act what we do have and probably many people are more familiar with it than i am in this room but how much covid supercharged the supply chain discussion not just on what we learned about protective equipment that we never thought of uh vaccine precursor chemicals and all of those types of things and where things were really made in the world we then had ukraine of course um adding essentially turbocharging that when we discovered wow we didn't realize this depended on some small manufacturers in Missouri we had no idea at the end of this long supply chain so seeing where we go with those kinds of investments uh and of course we're seeing that across the the it and electronic supply chain and we see that all the time in what the united states is doing with investment reviews and how rigorous uh those have become largely with very good reason of course right because we're looking at the trying to see are there hidden hands of adversaries where it's going to give them access in ways that are going to you know endanger the national security of the country or is it going to give them access to the supply chain in a way that we're going to become dependent and frankly i think it was a wake-up call to many people as a result of both covid and what we've seen in ukraine as we try to ramp up production and manufacturing and other things just how difficult that is and how you know what elissa had said how it are dependent we've come and that seems to apply across the board not just to you know things in the in the covid world but very much in the it infrastructure world what we see when we see the concentration in taiwan and what would happen there in a higher end conflict and the fact of the matter is is we're still very dependent for a number of very important components on people who may not have the us best interests in heart or even be allies of the united states so i think from an industrial policy and a military policy we're going to have to continue to think through that and manage those relationships clearly a complete cutoff would would be very problematic and so how we manage that has really been i think the the question that everyone is grappling with yeah i mean it's manifested in in different ways the discussions the the decoupling discussion regarding china which i think is polyanish i mean at best and i think to your point you're talking about recoupling in a way you there's the decoupling is probably not possible but but with these interconnected touch points you do have vulnerabilities it's somebody had a question this morning i think you know reaching back to the original sort of premises of the creation of the internet to your earlier point that there were a lot of it was going to be a a good for all right it ignored a lot of the potential harms that we've seen that are also involved and flow from that and i was sifting around through some things last night and i see an article around internet governance on a on a georgia tech website it's pretty good website but you know is the united states becoming china right so to your point of segmentation and fragmentation etc and they were making points about sypheus and other things what if china were to do to us companies i think they're already doing it but it's all manifest in in in different ways the same sort of recycling discussion how do we manage these relationships and i'm going to bring it to the theme of the the conference the power of partnerships well part of those partnerships as stressed in all sorts of strategic documents is international partners and partnerships how do we how do we manage that in this amidst global competition really good example in the panel earlier from the utility company talking about a partially owned canadian company because i think those of us in the national security space it's there's very bright lines when it comes to adversary countries and then there's pretty clear lines when it comes to our closest partners but there might be a range of potential international partners that are in between there's a there's a big range that is between our our clear adversaries and our very very closest partners that we still need to be doing more to figure out how to work with them partner with them particularly in the global technology space that are neither in not in either of those two categories and i think that's where sort of the the modernization of some of the sypheus related the the foreign investment conversation those pieces come into play even more in terms of thinking about our global partnerships when it comes to those countries that are neither the very clear adversaries nor the the the are very very closest allies and partners um i i think from uh from the from the role of a private company i think people might be surprised uh to understand how much of our day-to-day on the policy and legal side has nothing to do with the us or where the us is in conflict so the number of times we have to deal with data protection authorities in europe um because they're worried about the us government accessing uh data which should be something that we can solve and thankfully yes us you you us data privacy framework yes fantastic um but the number of things like that where really we're talking about people who are close allies and yet we're still in conflict with them from up from the from the private company side because two governments haven't talks um feels really challenging um and it's it's really hard from a company standpoint to manage that relationship and say no don't worry about the us no we're not going to respond to the us when they ask for something that sort of puts companies in a really challenging position um but if you want to do business as a multinational company you have to understand the role of those countries and again i'm not talking about i'm talking about allies i'm not talking about hostile countries i'm talking about allies and so understanding those partnerships and relationships where there are potentially conflicts um and trying to work them out from the government side i think is is something that doesn't happen enough um and often um i think when we interact with the us government the the number of people who don't process that there are other laws out there that apply to multinational companies is shocking right i mean i can't tell you how many conversations that we've had where people don't understand why don't you just let you let us in your networks well because that would cause us problems right i mean the number of conversations that we have on that point um again because of allies um is is really significant um i will also say um i think that one of the things that we see is trying to figure out what is being advocated for um in in sort of a policy positioning standpoint so if you have somebody who is sort of um on the border uh they're neither close ally as kerry said but they're nor are they adversary full adversary what are you asking them to do from a legal standpoint are you um when they put a law in place on data localization or on restrictions around sovereignty where's the us um what is the us saying um what what is the position of the us um how do you think about those roles i think we often see the us absent in those conversations um or in other conversations where the us i think could play a much more significant role in sort of shaping global conversations and global norms yeah i would just say you know there's when we talk about the competition and following on what elissa said about not just our adversaries but those allies uh and other related countries you know there's um everyone wants silicon valley everyone wants the dynamism and the innovation that the tech sector has produced in the united states and all of the things that it has done you know across the board what we've done in terms of cloud what we're doing in terms of ai of course everyone's talking about quantum and and uh whatever the next thing is on the horizon um but it is interesting because a lot of those countries have taken a very heavy handed regulatory approach or an exclusionary approach around data localization uh trying to in some cases hobble uh american companies that make it more difficult to operate um we can have a whole separate panel on whether that simply reflects different values across different countries and where they place the uh place their emphasis on things like uh competition policy privacy and other things or whether they're trying to protect uh local industries and create their own silicon valley um i have some personal views about you know good luck with heavy handed regulations somehow magically creating your own silicon valley um so we'll we'll just see where that where that comes out but my uh i guess i'd just say good luck to some of those countries because i don't really see that innovation and dynamism being created but i do see a lot of jobs for um bureaucrats being created so um you know we'll just see where that competition policy goes in the next uh decade uh as we accelerate the the innovations in the in the cyberspace world in ai in quantum across the technological board on on networking on data so you know there's just going to be a competition in these models um i don't know that the united states is going to join in that join in that competition um and we certainly hope that you know we we you know keep encouraging the innovation and the things that have frankly provided a tremendous home field advantage to the united states you know including our defense industrial base really to the kinds of things that you're you're operating the kinds of things that you're dealing with of course are just amazing and a lot of that comes out of our tech sector at at bottom in terms of producing the software and hardware that is a foundation for a lot of the you know incredible weapon systems that frankly the world wants right now right and uh is trying to get their hands on yeah i think um i think it's with respect to the new e u a i act right the that they've there's a category of social media platforms of a certain size it's a digital services act yes markets act one of those many regulatory e u things very very busy but you know if you look down the list of companies that they've identified as fitting in the category of being covered i think like 80 to 90 percent of them are u.s companies if steward bakery here he'd probably be a little less restrained i've heard of these it's this is just uh technological imperialism from from europe but um it is part of a we were talking yesterday i think behind all this there is a very live discussion about um in strategic competition shall we say ideological competition where are we with all of this and who's agitating to uh you know bring forth their own version of norms indigent in in internet governance in uh you know the the space of content moderation which fits underneath that uh you look at russia i've you know mentioned yesterday and in the first committee of the un pushing for a cyber crime convention which when you start peeling it away is essentially trying to define a whole bunch of information-based activity as criminal because it's being done on the internet therefore it's cyber crime um when we can imagine whose ends that serve how do we how do we do a better job of partnering internationally um to pierce through this and it's we would think that the europeans would be our best partners um and yet they're not necessarily our best partners and china who we could say is a defined adversary we have entanglements that are also complicating how we approach this so uh i'm actually going to start on some of the u things because i think they reflect a little bit about what's happening in the u.s as well so the digital markets act is essentially competition related and if you look at what's happening in the u.s on competition policy it's actually not that different um it there is some of the same incentives that are pushing the europeans are also pushing u.s policy on in different areas i think the challenge honestly from a regulatory standpoint is that there are lots of different interests and we see this across the board even in the u.s you have lots of different things pushing different ways from a policy standpoint so it's not all in one direction it's not all um we're not all in the in the strategic competition um there are lots of other interests at play and so how do you put those together into a coherent policy that does reflect the environment that we're in and that sort of anticipates the longer term uh the goals that we're trying to find it's really hard it's just the bottom line and digital policy is hard um i i think the thing that's happening on the international stage to your point about allies um so again going back to the foundation of the of the internet one of the the governance structures of the internet are multi stakeholder and that sounds really weird in a military environment but the idea that all sorts of people come together and make decisions about how the internet is run that is that actually is what happens right from a practical standpoint that's how protocols work that's why we have some of the the the ways that we have now for for how those things operate um right now in the international environment those things are being reconsidered um so uh they you know we're we're at a point where um some of those internet governance questions are coming up um and of course that's opportunity for a country that may for countries that may want to rethink those models um and so the challenge i think when you have a very complicated policy environment and regulatory environment and you have lots of different um goals from from a from a single government is that it's very hard to figure out what your policy position is when you get into those conversations so when you're talking about something like the global digital compact right um which is you know currently under negotiation or the cyber crime convention what are we trying to do as a us government um i think those are again we don't we don't always have one voice and that means if we don't have one voice how do we rally our allies around the same set of principles it's really hard i guess one way i would think about this is that from my perspective one of the challenges is that the united states still has not been able to settle on and agreed upon way that we categorize the technology companies the technology platforms in particular um in a legal framework and what i mean by that is so there's one theory out there that that some of the technology platforms basically function like utilities you can make that argument when you think about just the way that we need to use them on a daily basis i mean there's no aspect of life that you can go through from morning until night that in some way doesn't rely whether it's at work at home your social things the stuff you do with their kids everything there's there's no aspect of our life that doesn't rely on the uh infrastructure the technology infrastructure and the digital infrastructure so from that perspective it sort of sounds utility like and then there's other arguments out there that say well no particularly when it comes to communications platforms you know they're performing a function that's more like a news organization and so we have like these different old ways of thinking about um different industries and the way that the technology sector has evolved is just simply something different and are the unit when i say are the united states's lack of ability to sort of come up with a new framework that actually fits and isn't trying to fit these companies into an old legal framework that isn't applicable to the way that they conduct their work and the way that they operate in our lives has then left us having to respond and be reactive to for example what the europeans have done where they said okay you're not going to create a framework you're not going to put any um regulations in place then we're going to do it and we're going to impose it on you and that has placed us industry in a really difficult position well to some degree in in very different with very different approaches if we think content moderation for example in section 230 of the communication decency act here is almost entirely the opposite of what we see happening in europe now and their willingness to sort of step in and place these requirements on social media platforms and others for content moderation so it is it is challenging to think about how we how we get on common footing so as companies in the private sector i remember talking to um i think it was christin goodwin at microsoft several years back uh you know and similar conversation on the sidebar and it was you know you have to understand that you know x percentage of our customer base outside the united states which puts a lot of pressure even on the u.s companies and if you're feeling that the u.s government is not engaging i don't know do we have anybody from state here oh hello so they may they may have a different sense of whether we're we're engaging but what what's the level of interaction between companies and the government to convey these concerns and say you know how can we get on the same page and oh by the way does the company really want to be on the same page as the u.s government because of the competing interests that the companies have yeah i would say there's a lot of engagement um the the question is is really um the excuse me really the is the u.s able to engage and influence it so obviously a lot of concern uh i think in the u.s about these issues a lot of engagement but um a little bit be interested in this perspective but i think for a lot of companies there's somewhat on their own in engaging in europe and other places yes you know the u.s is able to support it but you know i think it's not the power of the voice that it once was you know we i think some of the challenges are the um it's not always clear what the u.s message is and i think that's not that's not a that's from a from from the government perspective that's a little bit of an interagency coordination problem you know we uh when you're looking at it from the private sector side this is going to be again kind of anathema to the military side of the world but the private companies look at it and say they pulled out of wto what um and all of these messages about the interconnected um you know interconnected trade and globalization why would they do that we had these great messages and you know in apac or in you know in asia pacific um what what does this look like for us and so you have you have this lack of understanding i think from a company side about um that the u.s isn't the u.s government isn't a monolith um and you have a lot of different voices and a lot of different influences um and but the the company doesn't see that they just see that the u.s isn't sort of supporting their commercial interests or supporting them as businesses and that that raises challenges i think longer term i i think for folks in companies who have been in government you can kind of see what's happening you can try to explain it um but i think it's still hard to understand you know if you're at a large company we're not a huge company we're a small company but if you're at a large company um and you're looking out and saying why isn't the government supporting me um in the competition world um why don't they want me to stay together uh in because i am a force against um in the global competition right um and i think that's confusing to a lot of people but again that's that reflection of a lot of different values um that that sort of gets swept in but i think that it's the interagency it's it's again kind of an interagency problem i would not i would not blame a single actor in the u.s government i think that we don't always have clear uh messaging across across different agencies we're not always synchronized across the interagency i know you're shocked everyone in the room is shocked okay so i want to scan for questions from the audience i think you should all be thinking too a little bit we have a lot of people in uniform in the room that's our primary audience here i can't talk to um who's watching from the outside um from what countries but certainly why does why does some of this matter you know you're you're in your fighting position looking over the edge of your your foxhole why does this broader discussion matter to do d or from a national security perspective you might think about that i can put it to the the panelists because no one's raising their hands with questions following on a listless point um you know we don't really we recoil as a government from having national champions right we we we don't have a national champion unlike some other countries who very much promote a certain area so that and there's a lot of good reasons for that but it can affect us in terms of that international that international that international discussion particularly when you have countries that look and say you know time and time again the power of american innovation american technology um kind of the freedom to innovate that the that the u.s has encouraged is just up for some of those countries that very different they speak a very different language um and particularly today in the world of world world of privacy and other things that you're seeing as they kind of free each new technology or you know kind of racing ahead to regulate it right our our traditional model has been let us see what develops here uh and then try to be a little bit slower and smarter hopefully about um regulation and and so right now you're seeing in europe and other countries a kind of like a new technology let's race to regulate it because we missed the boat on the last technology um you know i because you could tell i'm a little bit skeptical of that approach um and it results i think in some cases of some companies saying we're simply not going to operate in that country until we get a a clearer regulatory framework um you know we'll see that may in some cases we down to our benefit frankly from a technological superiority standpoint to the extent countries cut them off from that innovation but we're going to see what what happens so how do you see um right obviously there is that tension that tension between the push for innovation um giving an environment regulatory and otherwise that that uh favors innovation etc um are are we in a little bit of a through city and trap race you know we're in an AI race with a primary competitor um and how do we manage that question um on you know it's on everybody's plate these days AI and ones are taken over the world but um we're seeing more certainly in its executive order it's it's not to the point of legislation like in in europe um but how do we manage that that balance you need to ask questions folks because now we're talking about AI and that's all your fault um so i i will say um somebody gave an example at a at an event i was on a few weeks ago um on AI that i i thought was actually really interesting as we think about AI regulation um they talked about AI as a triangle that sort of considerations um you have uh you have safety security and supremacy um all at different points of the triangle and all pulling in different directions so you know the the reality to gary's question is as you think about AI the more controls you out of this the slower that you are going to go of course that's true from both the security side and the safety side which are different right so thinking about the protection of of an AI system just in general what kind of controls do you put on it and then thinking about the outputs on the safety side um i think i think the goal is to come up with not putting any of those at one point and saying this is absolutely we need to go as fast as possible clearly um i think we've learned that sometimes you do want controls on technology i think most companies have learned that too um but you then have to think about how you do that responsibly um and and still move the ball forward across all of them but i think that i thought that was a really kind of interesting model to think about those pieces as being intention i okay go ahead so i'm wondering on this like at a go at a global context like this this global competition frame there seems to almost be a global paradox where our global politics and our global reality are kind of different and what do i mean by that where regionalism nationalism industrial policy are taking hold simultaneous to our economies and our people becoming more and more connected and so as you advise with and i'll make this more tangible last year you know we had our most productive trade year with china simultaneous to probably our tensions being at their highest with between our governments so at that global level or advising through that it seemingly paradox how do you think through that or what advice do you have for wrestling through that for us start off a little bit i mean i think the the answer is very different if we're thinking i think part of it depends on are we thinking about this from a from a us government from a defense standpoint are you thinking about it from the private sector standpoint because i think the answers to those are going to be very very different um on the on the economic side of it i mean i think and that's why there's there's a difficulty in terms of the tensions within us policymaking right now right because on one hand we have a certain strand of our politics that is very aggressively treating china as an adversary and wants all u.s policy from from national security policy down to economic policy to be along that line and on the other hand we have the the private sector or commercial side of things that has markets and so that that tension is is continuing and i don't know that we ever get to a place where one is going to um uh outweigh the other i think we're continuing to navigate that line unless they're unless there is some acute sort of military catalyst that then changes the the balance yeah i mean we're we're the country's trying to manage through it right on a on a on a category basis right so we the the the new regulations around critical technology lists and other things and how that infects investment and essentially the government saying that in these areas right on this list of technologies on this locations we're gonna have a very heavy burden to allow you to invest in that kind of technology and those kinds of companies and we're also going to restrict exports to you um in that area right and that places a lot of tension on it because essentially their five and ten year plan identifies guess what many of those critical critical technologies is what they are saying are their priorities and at the same time there's a lot of things not on that list um where you continue to have interdependencies and of course we still have interdependencies for things on that list and the government's trying you know from our perspective the private sector the government's trying to manage through those interdependencies where you know it's still on that critical technology list but how do we how do we manage through that right it uh uh in in kind of manage the tensions in the adversarial relationship but as you said it's still a very large relationship it's still a very large um um trade flow so we've tried to you know it seems like now our our policy is to look very much at those critical technologies and have an ever lengthening list in ways that we didn't before right I mean it's not new right obviously things you know submarine propeller technology and all the defense things that were on there but now you look at that list and it's you know data sets on more than a million Americans and things that are a long way away from anything you saw for the past 30 years and when you look at you know bio and other other technologies so it's exactly what you outlined um right now I think we're trying to manage through it on a on a categorization basis right says if you're in these areas it's going to be okay um and we want investment and we want to continue the trade flows but when you're getting into a lot of the things that you deal with here in terms of cyberspace networking high-end software high-end hardware high-end processing uh we're going to have a more restrictive environment and you know potentially some some decoupling uh in those areas but that's obviously not the most stable place to be so we're going to continue to see these flare-ups we're going to continue to be on this this roller coaster I think so I think we have the grim reaper standing up there ready to cut us off so that's why I'm here um Carrie Ben Alessa sir gary thank you so much for that incredibly insightful and wide-ranging conversation despite some initial questions about the original topic I couldn't think of a better way to end day one so before we deliver a raucous round of applause for our incredible panel while I've got you three quick announcements for tomorrow so one we'll start back here tomorrow at 8 45 with administrative announcements two we're going to start day two with the national cyber director mr harry koker and then three just a reminder about our no-host social tomorrow at 4 45 at the golf club at the golf course final thing please grab your trash clean up your area take it out so with that thank you for a wonderful day one to our streamers everyone here and to our panel thank you so much the cyber national mission force or cnmf is a joint command available to us cyber command to respond to its toughest challenges 2024 marks the 10-year anniversary of the cnmf us cyber command established cnmf in 2014 recognizing the need for a force agile enough to respond to any crisis at any time composed of highly trained and qualified cyber operators drawn from across the services today the cnmf is composed of 39 joint cyber teams organized across six task forces consisting of soldiers sailors airmen marines coast guardmen guardians and nsa air force and di a civilians cnmf's mission is to plan direct and synchronize full spectrum cyberspace operations to deter disrupt and if necessary defeat adversary cyber and malign influence actors the cnmf conducts the full spectrum of cyberspace operations consisting of offensive defensive and information operations cnmf supports us cyber command and national priorities such as election defense counter ransomware global cyber security threat hunt operations and other operations of national importance cnmf works closely with other partners in the u.s government the cnmf routinely works with the fbi dhs nsa and others to defend the nation these partnerships are critical for this vital mission to defend the homeland each agency possesses differing authorities and capabilities the ability to quickly share information to leverage the proper authorities at the appropriate time secures the nation and keeps our adversaries off-guard engaging them as far forward in cyberspace outside the united states the cnmf is on the cutting edge of legal operations in the cyber domain since its inception cnmf continues to drive the evolution of cyber operations there has never been a better time to join the cnmf legal team the office of the staff judge advocate or osja conducts the full range of legal operations primarily focused on operational law however the office continues to provide advice across the legal disciplines individuals that join the cnmf osja must have a strong background in fiscal law administrative law international law military justice legal assistance and of course operational law the cnmf needs attorneys that are creative enough to link the various authorities together and present creative solutions to our clients as a plank holder in the cnmf osja you will have an opportunity to advise on unique and novel issues that have a direct impact on national events there are few other organizations in the government where you will be exposed to the type of issues that we see on a daily basis if you are a motivated legal professional that can work independently with little guidance we would love for you to apply to become a member of the cyber national mission force hi i'm colonel pete hayden and i'm excited to speak with you as a part of the u.s cyber command legal conference whether you are in person or virtual your interests in participation are critical to solving some of the toughest and most important and interesting legal challenges facing our nation our commander general hawk has set out his guiding priorities based on our competitive strengths people innovation and partnerships this conference will give us the opportunity to discuss exciting legal issues involving all of these priorities but i want to reach out on something near and dear to all of our hearts here at cyber command our commander's very first priority is people at every level we want to attract and develop talented practitioners in diverse disciplines to the cyber enterprise including legal professionals through participation in this week's events you'll see exactly why that's so important to cyber command to the services and to the nation the bottom line is this we need you here's why we hope that you'll want to join our team the cyber command enterprise is one of the very few places in which military attorneys routinely work side by side with partners from across the executive branch they also get the rare opportunity to partner with the best and brightest throughout the joint force to be a part of those high functioning joint teams comprised of talented attorneys from across the services our council work closely with the legislative office to help shape our congressional authorities whether drafting a legislative proposal identifying policy and legal implications of an authorization act or assisting with congressional testimony preparation our office is deeply engaged with our legislative liaisons and our legislative overseers our judge advocates civilian attorneys and paraprofessionals work closely with the private sector and academia to develop collaborative mechanisms to advance national security interests and defend against malicious cyber activity finally u.s cyber command attorneys regularly interface with our international partners on everything from military exchanges exercises information sharing to coordinating plans and operations furthering our interoperability and deepening relationships with our strategic partners here at united states cyber command we build relationships across the services industry research community academia and the whole of government and we do it to facilitate innovation and foster collaborative sharing platforms to advance our national security interests and defend against malicious cyber activity our partnership philosophy it's baked into our statutory mission to direct synchronize and coordinate military cyberspace planning and operations to defend national interests and collaboration with domestic and international partners our practice is diverse if you're a legal professional interested in national security law we offer you opportunities you won't find anywhere else through your legal advice cyber command will be better postured to defend department of defense information networks to generate insights and options in defense of the nation and in support of other combatant commanders and to ensure enduring mission advantage for the department of defense the united states and our allies and partners if you're an administrative law or a criminal law practitioner and you're listening in because you want to try something else or you just find this work interesting your analytic and advocacy skills are what we're looking for to solve emerging problems and make lasting change if you're a contractor fiscal law wizard please give us a call national security law and acquisition law work hand in hand to enable our operators to spur innovation and maintain our technological