Give them a finger and they'll take an arm a perfect saying to understand the state of the world Imagine the government is a medieval empire conquering a castle your freedom is that castle and a battle has to be waged To gain that castle back. They're not just going to give the castle back for free They're end goal in mind what they're now calling the great reset is a communist Socialist program to enslave us. No cars. No meat. No travel. No private property Mandatory medical compliance most people are happy wearing masks being locked inside like rats like some weird crazy dystopian movie Virtue signaling about how they're good little government slaves. It's amazing what fear can do People suddenly think the government cares about their health our food water and air Have been poisoned for dozens of years so that people are so stupid They can be convinced the government cares about their health let alone the millions of people out of work Thousands upon thousands of small businesses closing something that is probably going to be ignored until they're all gone the Psychological warfare and brainwashing really works ever try to convince a religious person their God doesn't exist. Yeah Good luck except what the media says now is their new God and They ain't changing their mind this will never end because the masses have been convinced It's for their own good What's really crazy is how many things we can refer back to that when said to any reasonable person Would raise suspicions about the truth Event 201 the John Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Hosted event 201 a high-level exercise on October 18th 2019 in New York, New York The exercise illustrated areas where public-private partnerships will be necessary during the response in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences Coincidentally the three months before it actually happened how convenient Everything is planned and the truth is hidden in plain sight You just require half a brain to recognize what they're telling you whatever they do is completely intended and scripted scientists professionals Experts fact checkers are simply there to deceive you from the truth.  That's not the truth something the American public doesn't seem to understand Why would someone lie to me?  It's so obvious when terms like the new normal and Social distancing we're ushered in at the mere start and are still the primary Terminology is being used that social distancing combined with the dehumanization aspects of mask-wearing Creates an environment that is conducive to people ratting out on their neighbors for taking off their mask to eat their breakfast cereal. Oh, I think I saw my neighbor cough through his window.  Really is the perfect tool for control if you can force people to do basically anything then just say, oh wait It mutated. Oh wait masks actually don't work You know constantly evolving sickness that never goes away is an unmatched weapon for tyrannical rule Oh, we're doing this for your safety It's for the good of everyone else and the public will believe whatever they plaster the mainstream news with Always fear-mongering stories to keep people in a state of panic Yet people can't even look up in the sky and see their spraying chemicals in it every other day That brings us to something everyone has noticed all of this infrastructure that has been set up Notably starting in February when they locked us inside when everyone was inside for that first wave The five grams towers were set up They put LED lamps on every street post and are installing cameras on every intersection and highway Smart meters in every home Amazon Alexa devices and we've already been monitored, especially these past years if you have a phone It's just going to be an extreme step up to where they will literally be able to read your mind and change your thoughts You know the high levels of these frequencies and the devices they require are in reality What's getting us sick unironically the symptoms of Toyota Corolla are identical to radiation sickness And humans are electromagnetic beings, you know our brains emit frequencies of our thoughts that's how Every energy particle on the planet functions and when you disrupt that with these non-native things You know you can alter people and also Get them to do what you want. So where does you know what tie into this surveillance?  Literally punish people for going out without a mask Staying out too late eating too much steak whether that means, you know, a fine Or as drastic as no food for your family that includes making us half cyborgs frying us with radiation 24 7 You know as if they aren't already microwaving babies with monitors and ultrasounds coinciding with this The central banks have to introduce a digital currency if they control all the wealth electronically They will be able to penalize you with the flick of a switch Literally seize all your assets if you disobey a lot of what's being said is just to keep people in fear Oh every day cases are at an all-time high continued psychological warfare fear mongering brainwashing in order to mind control people they have to be in fear and one of the government organizations actually Came out with a list of 10 criteria in order to brainwash someone and the mainstream media is basically checking every single box It's absolutely crazy But there is unfortunate truth to a lot of what is being said, you know The tools they will use to usher in this new system. We saw food shortages back earlier this year All store shelves completely wiped out and empty These are planned and as with everything Are to keep people in a scared and hopeless mindset They control the food supply if there's a food shortage They planned it and when people need food Man will they get desperate as much as I like to say they wouldn't take it to that level They're you know starving people to death in other countries already What's more likely though is they just ban meat consumption due to animals getting sick or fake climate lies You know, they can literally say oh, well the animals are sick So you can't eat the meat or they can say oh, well you can't eat that steak because uh, it's going to burn down a tree Just crazy stuff.  This is a real tweet. It's not a fake account.  It's absolutely insane I don't know how people don't just wake up and and just run into the forest. It's it's Asinine we're also seeing travel restrictions And so you might not be able to run to the woods and that makes sense given the circumstances we have in the world For the safety of everyone else you need to follow our rules in order to travel Whether that means getting injected or tested the recent article from ticket master Seem to be testing the waters of barring people from public events for not participating in their pharmaceutical tyranny You know, we know schools already require injections.  You need to get injected five times a year. That's that's what's going to happen The new york state bar association is recommending Mandatory injections for the state of new york the mandatory injection thing throws me for a loop because These psychos have to adhere to some type of natural law where you consent So i'm pretty sure they can't just spray this crap in the air and poison all of us. Otherwise, they would do that already Uh, but you know if mandatory injections don't scare you The fema camps in new zealand might you know rumor They're also building the same camps in canada the craziest part about this the test They're basing all of this tyrannical rule off of is inaccurate and has false positives making up arbitrary requirements for the public to abide by Tightening the shackles link by link. They've never even proved that you know what exists all of that being said We don't know exactly how they're going to get there. We just have those general ideas But we do know what the end goal is and they've even publicized their intentions calling it the great reset We've been referring to it as a global new world order Basically, everyone is a slave under the ruling elites and secret societies They're too strong as tools the fake illness and the fake climate nonsense are very real because they control them They can radiate people at the push of a button and spray chemicals in the sky and metals With a simple order to the military to alter the weather The average person is too brainwashed too poisoned to understand that illness and climate are controlled by the global elite Which in turn controls us now it gets discouraging once you realize that The majority of what you've been told your whole life and everything you're currently being told is fake And it requires a great deal of intelligence and understanding You know to peel back each of the layers and try to figure out what's really going on But hopefully you guys enjoyed this video. Hopefully you send this to some people I think this is a pretty good summary of you know, what's happened Over the past few months and things we've been seeing I guess the most important thing you can do is try to maintain a positive mindset You know focus on some goals. That's why I'm really Gunning on getting this you know farm operation up and running to keep providing you guys with high quality food And and get people healthier and happier and and thinking straight But if you guys could please just drop a like on the video leave a comment down below Of course subscribe make sure the notification bell is checked and above all if you guys can share this on social media Help me out a little bit Take care guys


Welcome back to tennis talk. My name's Cam Williams, and it's time for the weekly ranking show And we don't have too many changes this week to the rankings Some changes in the middle of the rankings for the men But let's go look at the past results because we had some upsets last week in the tournaments starting with the WTA And we had the Hamburg open with para winning her second title in two weeks beating Contivate in the final 6264 to lift another trophy and she got a boost in the rankings for that at the Palermo open We had begu beating bronzetti 6262 at the Swiss open We had Caspar route defending his title defeating Baratini in a very fun match 467 6662 route adding another clay court title to his career and at the Hamburg open the biggest tournament of the week We had Moussetti defeating Elcaraz in a very entertaining final 6467 6464 the first title for Moussetti And it was an ATB 500 so a big title for him and he got rewarded in the rankings for that Let's start with the WTA rankings and not too much change with igish fjontek staying at number one and net contivate staying at number two and Distancing herself from Zachary who's at number three We've got bedosir at four which a bird just close behind at number five Savalanca at six Pagula comes in at seven Daniel Collins She goes down one spot to number nine allowing Mugarutha to go up to number eight That's because last year Collins had an event that she didn't play and didn't do well at this week So lost a lot of points for that and Emerita Kanu She still stays in the top ten for another week having a look at the race to the finals and no change here with igish fjontek Still the only play to qualify staying at number one Jabir at number two with Goff at number three Pagula comes in at number four with Zachary at number five Kazakina comes in at six bedosir at seven Benchage at eight Kudumat over at nine and Daniel Collins rounds at the top ten for the race of the finals this week having a look at the players that have gone up in the rankings this week and The two champions of last week's tournaments for goo She went up 12 spots number 32 in the world and para goes to a career high 54 in the world 27 spots higher than last week after winning her second title in a row So couple of players at one titles last week getting boost in the ranks couple of players who went down in the rankings Zenevska she went down 27 spots number 99 in the world After losing a bunch of points from tournaments that she won last year and Rusei down to 104 in the world 35 spots lower than last week again losing a lot of points from matches and tournaments that she won this time last year So no surprise there the players that did well this week and gained a lot of points went up and the players that didn't repeat Their result from last year went down having a look at the ATP now and not too many changes with Mehbedev Still at number one is very abstaining at number two with raffer at number three So D-pass comes in at number four But al-Quraz after making the final of Hamburg gets to a career high number five in the world one spot higher than last week Pushing rude who won a tournament and still lost it down in the rankings He went down to number six and that's because Hamburg the final was worth more than winning gestard So it depends on it's not so much what you win It's where you win or how well you do at certain tournaments and that proves it just there number seven is jokovic Coming in at number eight is Rubelev Ozealia sim comes in at number nine and yannik sinna rounds out the top 10 for this week Having a look at the race of the finals and again not too many changes with raffer staying at number one He's so close only 400 points away from qualifying for the ATP finals Sidney pass though He goes down to number three making way for al-Quraz who added 300 points to his total making the final in Hamburg So he goes in at two Sidney pass goes down to three Kasparud He stays at number four and solidifies his spot after a win last week It's very of a staying at number five despite not playing Mehbedev comes in at six Rubelev at seven Felix Ozealia Seaman eight Taylor Fritz at nine and Novak Djokovic hanging on to that top 10 spot for now But we all know he's not gonna be playing for a few months while a lot of players will be playing over the American Hardcore season, so I don't know how much longer we're gonna see Djokovic on this list having a look at the players that have gone up In the rankings this week and mouseti like I said Korea high ranking 31 in the world He's gone up 31 spots higher than last week after winning in Hamburg the biggest trophy of his career and Dominic team after another very good performance making a semi-final last week He's gone up 75 spots to 199 in the world So again team trying to get in the top 100 for the US Open So he can automatically qualify to play and the players that have gone down in the rankings a couple of players that played Well last year at this time Ramos van Olis He's gone down 12 spots at number 52 and Gaston has gone down 16 spots to number 75 So again players that did well this week that earned a lot of points and the players that didn't result The same as what they did last year went down in the ranks So not too many changes on either the ATP or WTA But but still we're gonna keep an eye on Dominic team who keeps rising up the ranks So there you have it not too many changes like I mentioned not too many changes in the rankings at all But we do have the American Hardcore season coming up starting unofficially I guess this week in Atlanta, but then next week on the 1st of August. That's when we kick off We've got Washington San Jose and of course in the big tournaments Cincinnati and Canada and then the US Open at the end of the month So we're getting serious now. The US Open series is here. Let me know down in the comments below Are you shocked about any of the rankings? I mean, there's not too much to talk about There's not too much to be surprised about but I guess over the next few weeks Especially with Djokovic not being able to play how far will he fall? I guess over the next couple of months because remember He has a lot of points to defend at the US Open and he won't be able to defend any of those Let me know down in the comments below. Is there anything that shocks you in the rankings this week?


Tituakini hijawe ya w fatele. Ziva yu uza yuh disturbu kwa maliamehawe wim제가 hwana kwenya hatu ilu anfiraria q cosawe hiriawe yilire. K招umiliha wakilisha kwa mahi kwa kwa wiga wiki yuza yuza yuza nwa yumole feza yuza yuza yuza yuza wiki yuza kwa kwa wika dekani yuza, wiki yuza. Yokwa umisha ndwa na unuhu kwa bayamika jutu. Sama, every one must be aware of it's pitfalls and guard seweza o katamaakwekari ya mga resa. Native zunia mwa this empowerment must begin at an early age hens the aim of this conference is to empower young digital citizens to use the internet and to use it safely. I must therefore emphasize the role of our partners as co-organizers of different sessions and thank them for their help in driving the discussions and share their valuable experience and knowledge in protecting children online. The internet is connecting the world like never before. In Africa too, internet use is experiencing a boom. According to ITU statistics, mobile program penetration in Africa increased from 2% in 2010 to 11% in 2013, which is the highest growth rate compared to other parts of the world. The number of internet users in Africa witnessed a rise from 17 million in 2005 to 148 in 2013. This is remarkable. Despite its enormous benefits, the internet also comes with risks. This applies to Africa as much as anywhere else in the world. Following the rapid expansion of the internet, cybersecurity has become an emerging challenge for Africa in recent years. We must ensure that the responsible and safe use of the internet is well promoted, especially for vulnerable groups such as children. While the risks are very real, the risk of not being part of the high-tech revolution is even greater. It is a fundamental right for African children to benefit from using the internet and to have adequate protection at the same time. This conference will therefore focus on different challenges related to child online safety, from legislation to building capacity, from the role of industry to the need of empowering children to become global digital citizens. Ladies and gentlemen, I strongly believe that child online safety can only be achieved by working together international collaboration and cooperation and our key to ensuring a holistic and comprehensive approach. Since the launch of the Child Online Protection Initiative in 2008, ITU has brought together different stakeholders to work toward promoting child online protection worldwide. Through a broad coalition of 193 member states, international organizations and non-government organizations, private corporate partners and child advocacy groups, the COP initiative aims to promote the importance of child safety in the online world, develop practical tools to assist governments, industry and educators, and share experiences in ensuring a safe and secure online experience for children everywhere. It also aims to address legal, technical, organizational and procedural issues relevant to protecting children online. Many countries in Africa are already taking action to ensure the safety of children online. I am confident that this conference will be an important step in this direction. Let's work together to ensure a brighter future for African children. Let's give them access to a better, safer and more trustworthy internet. I count on you. Thank you.


Now, open up timer underscore o3.pi. This code does the exact same thing as timer underscore o2.pi, but it does it a little differently.  You can choose the one that best suits your needs and your style as you become more comfortable with it. In Python, by convention, the language was created in order to make code more easily readable, more natural to interpret. So as you're making these small decisions about how to do things, keep that in mind. This particular way is not necessarily more readable than the one we just did, but it is an alternative that illustrates some useful concepts, so we're going to call it out. Instead of a for loop, we have reintroduced our while loop. If you remember when we were working on the clock, we set up a while true to make a loop of code that's just going to keep running forever. Well, now we're going to use while with something that won't always be true to show how this works. So we're going to play with logic just a little bit. This variable called done on line five, we're initializing it to the value false. So it's a Boolean variable, which means it can either be true or false, one of two values, that's it. Then in line six we say while not done. So done is false. Not false is true. Not is a special word to Python. It says whatever this Boolean thing is, do the opposite. Interpret it the opposite. So if done is false, then not done is true. So for this pass at least, not done is true. The thing in the while parentheses is true, so execute this loop of code. Start by sleeping one second, then print how many seconds are left in the timer. We use our same construction with the carriage return, end character, the F string with seconds left and the spaces after it to overwrite extra digits. Then we take that seconds left value and we subtract one from it. So we do this trick where we say seconds left equals seconds left minus one. Whatever it was, it's now one less. Then we do another thing that is new for us. We check whether something is true. So in this case, the thing we're checking is seconds left is less than or equal to zero. If that little expression is true, then do the code that comes after, which in this case says take our done variable and assign it to be true. So the if statement says if, and that's this expression, evaluates to be true colon. Do whatever is in the code block below, and you know what that code block is because it's indented. So we're up to two indents now. This second indent, line 11, is the code block for the if statement. So what this will do is it will go through, it starts at 11 seconds left, and then each time it'll print 11, 10, 9, it'll count down. Each time it will decrement seconds left by one, finally seconds left will be zero. Once it is zero, done will be true, then when we go up to line six and we check again, this time through the while loop, not done is now false. So the while loop is finished. It moves on, the code moves on to line 12, line 13, and prints ding. So just to rehash that flow, it starts at the beginning, seconds left gets assigned to 11 on line three. Done gets initialized to false, and our while loop then is while not false. So while true, do this loop, line seven through 11, repeat again and again. Each time the check at line 10 fails, because seconds left is not equal to zero, and it's not less than zero, it's greater than zero. Also finally, after going through this 11 times, seconds left is equal to zero, done becomes true, the while loop completes, and we print a ding. We can run it and verify that this is indeed the case. It starts at 11, counts down, one by one, second at a time, ding, and we're done.


In this video, we'll spend some time looking at the background of what everybody should know about instructional video that I think will make it easier to place the videos we're creating in the right context. So what should everybody know? Well, let's start with a bit of a puzzle. I'll show you a quote and think about what year is that quote from? And also who said it? So the quote goes like this, books will soon be obsolete in the public schools. Scholars will be instructed through the eye. It is possible to teach every branch of human knowledge with the motion picture. Our school system will be completely changed inside of 10 years. And we have been working for some time on the school pictures and it proves conclusively the worth of motion pictures in chemistry, physics, and other branches of study, making the scientific truth difficult to understand from textbooks plain and clear to children. So this quote is from 1913. This quote is by Thomas Edison, who gave that when he was interviewed about the future of the motion picture and education, back that motion picture now, a video. But what happened? If you add 10 years to 1913, you certainly know that didn't happen. The education system wasn't transformed. And if you look at the history of education and videos, you'll see that that hasn't happened for many decades until quite recently. So in the 1940s and 60s, there was a lot of public information films, children's programming on television. In the 70s, it was open university, educational videos on TV. In the U.S., it was a schoolhouse rock. In the 1980s, there was a big hope around VCR and laser discs changing the face of education. And then again, that same hope was put into the CD-ROMs in the 1990s. But none of these things have actually made videos integral to learning. It was always a secondary source of information, secondary ways of approaching the material and for instructors to interact with their students. But now I think we are in a different state. But let's first think about what are some of the specifics of videos that have made it so difficult for video to actually make much headway into education. There are I think three areas in which we need to pay attention. So there's a consumption of videos, a production, and distribution. So in terms of consumption, I think we have to remember that video is a very linear medium, which means the navigation can be somewhat difficult, that there's no easy way to skim or scan a video. Skipping is also not that easy. It's very much bound to the equipment that the video is being transmitted over. And headway often is bound to a particular place. So if you compare that to a book, that is very different. A book you can take anywhere with you. It's just a book. A book doesn't need any additional equipment. And it's very easy to skim, scan, skip around, and so on. And of course, unlike a book, videos are also much more difficult to produce. It's very expensive to do it. You can't just have one person doing it. You generally need more than one person a team. Once you've produced it, it's very difficult to modify. And it ages quite quickly. And it's not just the content. It's also the people, hairstyles, clothing, and so on. So videos are often go out of style. And then if you want to modify that, you pretty much have to record a new video. Whereas with a book, if you want to republish an old text, you simply publish it again, maybe add some new pictures, a more modern layout. And with very little expense, relatively, you have been able to update an old text with a video that is not possible. And of course, even with all of these things, if you solve them, they still have the issue of delivery. With delivery, there's the issue of media compatibility. There's also the cost that has to do with bandwidth and requirements. In the old days, it was postal requirements, file size, and so on. So these are all the things that were always a problem with video. And of course, if you take that into the school environment, then that's even more difficult. So if many people remember the video equipment, TVs, and VCO has been rolled into classrooms, and then it always took up a lot more time. And so it really had to be worth the teacher's time to use a video in a classroom. And that also has, I think, held back video as a medium education. But as I indicated, right now, I think things are changing. Where I would say that we're actually in the middle of a video revolution in education. And what is behind that revolution? Well, it's very clearly YouTube. YouTube has made a tremendous difference in the way video has permeated the world of learning and education. And so what are the components of this revolution? Well, first, the ease of production. So we talked about how difficult production is. And that, of course, has changed a lot. And YouTube didn't introduce these means of production, but it actually stimulated a lot more development in those areas. So there's a lot of cheap technology. A lot of people have developed skills by creating these videos. So it's no longer have to be a film expert to create videos. And also it's much easier to update videos to create new ones. And as all this has been going on, there's a new language of video has developed. So people are now exploring different ways of communicating through video rather than just the old ways of what we're used to seeing from on TV and on film. But what YouTube has also done now that we've produced the video is increase the ease of distribution. So, of course, all of the video is now distributed online. And it's very cheap, sometimes completely free, and both for the distributors and for the consumers. And it is very mobile. So you're no longer tied to one place. So all of a sudden, video is much more like a book used to be. You can take it with you anywhere, even though there are still some technical requirements. And that has all contributed to increase in the ease of consumption. So videos are now often freeze with captions. It's a lot easier to add additional ways of interacting with the content. People can increase the speed of playback and then listen at the higher speed to get more of the videos more quickly. It's easier to navigate because, of course, all of it is done on a mobile device. You can easily swipe around with a finger. You can put bookmarks in and things like that. And also, you can also combine short videos into bigger holes. That's something, for example, that Linda is doing. And this revolution, I think, has brought some consequences that are also worth exploring. So first, there are a lot of new pedagogies that have developed as a result of the sort of increased ease of producing, consuming, and distributing videos. So MOOCs are perhaps one of the bigger phenomena of recent years, which pretty much is using the opportunity of creating relatively cheap videos and putting them as online courses that are then available to a large number of people. But also, even within the classroom, this new pedagogy has developed. It's called the FLIP classroom, where the teacher prepares videos ahead of time with the content, and then during the classroom, just focused on practice. And actually, that's what I'm doing right now. So I'm creating this video for people to watch before the workshop, and then we don't have to waste time on explaining what the FLIP classroom is and what these things are during the workshop. And then just focus on how to make the most out of the materials that we want to develop and how to get some practice in. There's also a huge growth in informal learning. Everybody has learned something on YouTube, whether it's being how to fix a washing machine or how to do math, how to play the piano, how to improve their learning of calculus. And that can all happen outside the school in many, many areas. And of course, there are also other things that are happening in the schools, such as capturing lectures that can then be replayed to students and so on. Now, of course, there are many new platforms. And the most obvious is YouTube, but there's also Vimeo. So there are many more ways of sharing the videos. There are other bandwidth providers who can even help you distribute the videos yourself if you don't want to use YouTube or Vimeo. There are many providers for lecture capture. And also, I think the biggest platform really that has grown alongside video is that they mutually enable each other's smartphones or both grade video consumption devices, but also video production devices. And all of this has contributed to the growth of new institutions in the broadest possible sense. So I think YouTube channels are sorts of institutions on YouTube. Anybody can start a channel and start posting videos on an educational topic. And many people have done that, and we'll have a look at some of them. And one of them is Khan Academy, which was started off as just a YouTube channel. And now it's a big nonprofit that has hundreds, maybe even thousands of videos on different topics that hundreds of thousands of millions of people have learned from, including myself. There are many video providers now that provide commercial videos or paid for videos, like lynda.com, which was sold from billions to LinkedIn, which is now part of Microsoft. There's Udemy, a competitor to Linda, Skillshare, and so on. There are many opportunities for people to both share the videos they made and also learn from people who made videos. There are many platforms where people can share their courses, like Edex or Coursera, or Future Learn in the UK, the MOOC providers that again provide probably by now thousands of courses that people can learn from on those courses that are usually built around video. There is the Great Courses platform, which started in the 1990s as an audio lecture provider, but it has now branched out into videos, and again, there are many videos that you can subscribe to and watch whole, entirely, university courses. And there's a recent entry into this market called Masterclass that does really highly produced video courses from some of the top people in their profession, be it their musicians, film directors, sports people, and so on. So that just kind of shows us that we're in a new space when it comes to instructional video. And then in the next video, we're going to have a look at different formats of instructional videos and what are some of the options for us out there.


Okay, this is probably the biggest fail of a video I have ever made, and it's sponsored. First, we have to go back to 2008. LucasArts released the very first Star Wars game that was supposed to be canon within the universe, branching and connecting together the first two movie trilogies and giving players the experience of finally entering and playing a full Star Wars movie in a way like never before. Now, in 2022, that game has finally launched on Nintendo Switch, and I was asked to make a video about it, and I said yes, if I can do whatever I want with the video, and the developers that are porting this game over to the Switch said fine, do whatever you want. So I decided I would make a full Star Wars mini movie that is canon within the Star Wars universe and tied into me playing this game. The idea was great. I fully scripted, storyboard, and planned a full day shoot. I even bought two replica lightsabers and two outfits, a Jedi outfit and a Sith outfit. I was going to play both characters. I even bought a Yoda outfit for my cat. It was going to be so good. Then a lot of things ended up going wrong, and the first one was this. I got very sick. I'm honestly so sick, and I don't know how I'm supposed to make this video. Now even though I was a complete wreck, and it delayed essentially the shoot and everything I had planned, when I finally got over my fever and started feeling better, I did manage to get a couple of things shot, and I want to show you that, but it didn't go as planned. I'm going to get to the horrific experience that was trying to shoot a mini movie post COVID in 90 degree Texas weather dressed fully in robes in a hot silo, an abandoned silo that we found on the side of the road. Before we get to that though, I should probably actually talk a little bit about the game, because this is still a sponsored video. Star Wars The Force Unleashed is available right now on the Nintendo Switch Store. There's a link in the description if you want to support this train wreck of a video. I'd really appreciate it.  When I was 18, playing this game for the very first time, I remember it looking amazing. Like a full Star Wars movie come to life, and I was excited to once again experience this game and everything that made me fall in love with the character that is Starkiller, but... So I've been playing this game for a couple hours now, and it immediately as I started, I was like, something is amiss.  When you go back and play an old game and you're like, whoa, this has aged so much, but I don't think my brain mis-remembered it this much. I looked up on my phone gameplay, and sure enough, it looked completely different. And like, this is what I remember, like what I'm seeing on my phone right now. And that's when I realized, this is the Wii version. Yeah, so for those that might be too young to remember, this is bananas. It's still crazy to me, but a lot of my favorite games and a lot of games used to do this thing where on a certain console or PC, it was a completely different game. Like they would develop different versions of the same game, and Star Wars Force Unleashed was one of the last games to do this. But the wonderful people at Aspir, who are sponsoring this video, by the way, took the insane amount of effort and time to port the Wii version to the Switch. I say they took the time and effort to port the Wii version because it has motion controls. I was a little confused. I was like, why all these years later would you port the Wii version when you have that version? But when I was looking up like the footage online on YouTube, under the Wii version, every like all the comments were saying this was the best version of the game. Out of all the versions, they enjoyed the Wii one the most, and that's the one they go back and they replay time after time because it's just the most fun to play, mostly because of how good the motion controls were. I'm not a big motion control guy, so I was even hesitant to start playing with them, but sure enough as soon as I started, I never went back. So here's how it works. The right hand does the sword swinging, and I was actually instantly impressed with the fact of how responsive it is. If I swing left, he swings left, right is right, I mean, you get the picture. Even up and down do specific up and down moves. Then I can even throw the lightsaber. That's actually pretty sick. So instantly I started having way more fun. The left hand controls lightning, and also the force powers, so if I want to like throw things around the room, I can do that too. Obviously, maybe now with things like VR. We have similar experiences, but I could imagine going back in the day to 2008 and being able to just force push things around and pick them up and throw them, throwing my lightsaber all with the motion controls. So yeah, since I figured out how good these motion controls are, I really have not gone back to playing with a pro controller because why would I? So yeah, the game wasn't the game I expected it to be, but I got to experience a game that I loved back in the day in a different way, weird, hilarious animations and all. But later reassigned to a top secret project. Is there a psychological profile in there too? Actually yes. Okay, but let's backtrack a little bit because I still want to show you the very small amount that I got done because there was one thing that we did that was really cool. So to get to that, I got to show you the thing we did that wasn't. I never even got to film anything as the Sith apprentice and I still haven't opened, I want to at least wear this outfit one time. I bought it. I could return it, but whatever. Okay, honestly, it's pretty sick. I know you can't really see the whole. It's even got a hood. Okay, that's pretty sick. These lightsabers are really cool by the way. And that's another thing. I'm not kidding. I put in so much effort into this. I even downloaded a program and learned how to do a lightsaber effect and it looked sick. I tested it with a broomstick before I went out and shot everything. But by far the thing that took the most amount of time was I learned how to do the Obi-Ani lightsaber trick. I spent three hours learning how to do this to the point where my hand is still bruised and blistered and I can barely move my thumb because it's actually extremely painful learning how to do these tricks. But I wanted to do something cool for the video. I want to say that I was really proud of how I worked. Everything they wanted me to talk about the game into the script. There's a battle mode where you can duel a player with a local multiplayer co-op. The duel mode by the way is sick. And yeah I was going to have the Sith apprentice use red joycons because of a... I thought out everything. You have all of these characters, Obi-Wan, Anakin, Qui-Gon, like there's so many. Luke Skywalker. So you can do Luke Skywalker versus Darth Maul if you want to have that epic matchup that never actually happened. It can pick one of the many locations the game has to offer. Like the Wookiee Homeworld or the floral planet of Flucia. Of course, Tatooine is always a favorite. Raxus Prime, the junkyard. You ever seen Luke Skywalker versus Darth Maul on Tatooine? Well you're about to. So this mode was again specific to the Wii version. In fact the Wii version had extra levels that were specific to its version. It has more content than all the other versions. But yeah I just love the idea of this mode. And the fact that they kept it in and they ported it over as well from the Wii version. All right. Let me show you what was supposed to start this whole video with the intro skit. What we did manage to shoot. It wasn't all of it. I wanted to it wasn't supposed to be this bad. Also turned out that the audio recording because I was mic'd up because the audio was so echoey in the silo we were shooting in. We had to use the mic audio but the mic audio everything was cursed. This is what it sounded like when I got into editing.  I don't know what happened. Oh yeah and my oh no my character in the start was supposed to be talking to my Yoda. My master which was going to be my cat dressed as Yoda. I haven't even used that. Let's let's do that. I want to see if I can get that Yoda outfit on Simon. It just for fun. This is what the full set outfit looks like by the way. I don't know if I can hit you with the Obi-Wan here. I'll probably break so I try. Go ahead. Which way was it like that? Forward. There you go. I'm gonna break something. Did it look cool for a second? Yeah. Okay then I'm gonna stop. I think I can do it faster but I ain't gonna. Hey Simon you want this? I don't know is it for me? This is not going to go well I don't think. I don't think Logan would stand for this at all. Yeah Simon's more game to put on an outfit. It has a little lightsaber. Oh good Greek looks like a popsicle. He bought him clothes. Simon.  I know I know Simon. I thought if I could just like be quick. He thought you could just get him to run into the sleeves. Yeah I was like well there's no sleeves per se. Do you want me to put him on him? You think? Yeah if you want to hold the camera. Oh Simon. Oh no. Yoda where are you going? Baby cook. Oh no. He shook the hat right off.  Well believe it or not they don't make him for cats but I got the smallest one I could. Look at the Groku. He's still swimming. The forest is with you. He's having a nice time. I know he likes it. He's just very confused. It just doesn't fit him. Yeah. He's just by default doesn't want this stuff on him. He just shakes it off. He's like if I don't want this I'll just leave. My plan was to get him in that outfit and on green screen to green screen him into the seat. You thought you were going to get him to okay. I don't know what I was thinking. I don't know. Now that all the elements and the parts are in place this is the terrible skit that we shot that isn't finished that was supposed to be part of the beat em ups Star Wars movie. I train. And I train. And I continue to train. Day after day. I don't feel like I'm getting any stronger. I don't feel like I'm strong enough to face him. Strong enough you may not think you are but ready you will be. You keep saying that and I have no idea what it means. For now concentrate on your virtual training you must.  I don't see how a video game is going to help me train to be a Sith apprentice. So be it. That's the story of this video and why it failed so badly. But I ended up having such a fun time playing the game even though I was sick. I didn't want to cancel on the video. I didn't want I'm still a little sick. I didn't want to cancel on the video. I didn't want to cancel on the developers which were who were excited to see because I was like I'm gonna make a whole movie and they were like oh cool. I didn't want to just scrap everything and I also had this one really cool shot I at least wanted to use for something. If you played this game on Wii and you loved it and you want to go down the Stouge of Lane or you played one of the other versions and you want to see what the Wii version was like or you've just never played the game before. Let me tell you it's a ton of fun to play. It's on the eShop right now you can grab it and it's a really interesting concept of what would happen if Darth Vader had an apprentice. So link down below check it out it would also help support the channel a lot and you get to play a fun game. So thank you to the developers for allowing me to do whatever I want and that whatever I want being me talking about what I wanted to do. You did a great job porting the game though. It's beautiful. Thank you guys for watching.


This paper proposes a novel paradigm and model for detecting dim targets in remote sensing images using brain-computer interfaces, BCIs. The proposed paradigm involves searching for targets while recording EEG signals from participants. This allows for the extraction of event-related brain responses associated with target detection. Additionally, a domain adaptation method was used to reduce the impact of subject differences between different datasets. The proposed model, called the domain adaptive and channel-wise attention-based time-domain convolutional neural network, DCT-CNN, was trained on EEG data collected from participants performing the AVEP task. The DCT-CNN outperformed other models in terms of accuracy and generalizability. Furthermore, visualizations of spatiotemporal features showed the effectiveness and interpretability of the proposed paradigm and model. This article was authored by Liangwei Fan, Huixian, Fengyuxia, and others. We are article.tv, links in the description below.


In now to France, where the President Emmanuel Macron has given one of the country's highest honors to Lyon Gaultier, the last surviving member of the French commando unit that waited on show on D-Day alongside Allied troops to begin the liberation of Europe. Macron presented methods to Gaultier and other service personnel at a ceremony just outside Paris to mark the anniversary of a June 18, 1940 radio address by ex-August leader General Charles Toe Gore, a calling on the French people to rise up against the Nazi occupation. Gaultier rose from his wheelchair to stand leaning on two sticks as Macron peamed the metal on his chest. The French President then kissed him on both cheeks and embraced him. Gaultier was made a ground officer of the Legion of Honor. So you get notified about fresh news updates.


Nice Jalen hurts one of one. No way tag shield tag for the bike air for the Eagles. Congrats, Philly That's dope dude. Go to Nate. Let's go Nate. Hey, wow. Hell yeah, there he is. Let's go Nate There he is in Twitch. Let's go Nate. Go Nate. Congrats, brother


Slope gives us a way to quantify this geometric idea of steepness and what that means is that we can start to apply all of the tools of algebra to many of the problems in geometry. This does require that we find the algebraic equivalent of geometric ideas. So let's begin with a couple of simple ones like horizontal and vertical. So suppose I have a line. If I want to talk about the slope of the line, I'll need two points. So one of these points will call, I don't know, X1, Y1. And maybe I'll take another point, X2, Y2. Now the use of the variables means that while these points have definite coordinates, I'm not going to commit myself to what those coordinates are, at least not yet. But if the line is horizontal, I do have to make a commitment. So let's make this line horizontal. Nope, too far. So now we have a horizontal line and now we have to commit ourselves. If the line is horizontal, the vertical distances from the x-axis have to be the same. So Y2 must be Y1. So the slope of the horizontal line will be, if you remember slope is rise over run, the rise is zero and the run is, well, who cares, it's going to be zero. Or you could drag in the slope formula and calculate it. Since Y2 is equal to Y1, then the numerator is going to be zero and who cares what the denominator is. And this proves the following result, the slope of a horizontal line is zero. What if we have a vertical line? So again, I have one point, X1, Y1, and another point, X2, Y2. Again, I'm not committing myself, except I have to. If the line is vertical, then X1 has to be equal to X2. And that's because I have to go over some distance and I can go up different amounts, but I can't go over any further or any less and still get a vertical line. Because the line is vertical, I know that X1 is equal to X2. So this denominator, X2 minus X1 is, and we got a problem because we're trying to divide by zero, this is undefined. So this proves another important result, the slope of a vertical line is undefined. What about parallel lines? Suppose we have two parallel lines. We can find the slope of one line by choosing two points and determining the rise and the run between the points. We can find the slope of the other line in the same way, but if we choose points on the other line so that one set of points is directly above the other set of points, we see when the runs are the same. The rises also have to be the same. Otherwise, the two lines won't be parallel. And this leads to the following theorem. Parallel lines have the same slope. What if two lines are perpendicular? So let's consider that the slope of one line is going to be m equals rise over run. Now, if the lines are supposed to be perpendicular, then the rise of the second line must be negative the run of the other. And similarly, the run of this line must be the same as the rise of the other. So that means if the lines are perpendicular, the slope of the other line must be m prime minus run over rise. And this leads to the following result. The slopes of perpendicular lines are negative reciprocals. For example, let's take a line that passes through the points 2, 1, and 5, negative 3. And let's find the slope of a line parallel and the slope of a line perpendicular. Well, in order to find that, we need to find the slope of the line. Negative 4 thirds. Since parallel lines have the same slope, then the slope of a parallel line will be the same negative 4 thirds. What about a perpendicular line? The slopes of perpendicular lines will be negative reciprocals. So the slope of the perpendicular line will be negative 1 over the slope. So that's negative 1 over negative 4 thirds. So we'll invert and multiply. And we get the slope of the perpendicular line 3 fourths.


So I wanna add some more terminology to our discussion of the axiomatic method. And so these are gonna be some adjectives to describe axioms here. So if you take an axiom of a system, right? So this is a statement which is assumed to be true, irrelevant of anything else, right? It's a true statement because it's an axiom. We say that an axiom is independent if it's not a theorem of the other axioms. So let's say like we have these axioms, axiom one, axiom two, axiom three, and axiom four, much like the FIFO theory we've developed here. Let's say that we were to actually prove axiom four, using as a proof we could use axioms one, axiom two, and axiom three. So if we could actually prove axiom four, which is a statement, right? Axioms are statements. If I could prove that statement using only the other three axioms, then that means that our axiom is actually what we call dependent. It's a dependent axiom means it's a theorem of the other axioms. And if you have a dependent axiom, it turns out that you don't actually need it because you can prove it from the other ones. An independent axiom would suggest that this is not possible. The axiom is not, you can't prove it from the other axioms. You need it in a manner of speaking to further the theory. We say that a set of axioms is independent. If each axiom is individually independent, and hence a set of axioms is dependent if one of the axioms is dependent in there. That's to say the set is not independent. Now, we oftentimes have dependent axioms for one or two reasons. One, we might not know the axiom is dependent upon the others because the proof isn't yet found. It could be very difficult, very convoluted, very lengthy. And so because the proof is unknown, we have the axiom, but we might discover later on, oh, we didn't need it. So you could redevelop the theory by scratching it out. The other reason we sometimes take on dependent axioms is that it's for convenience. That I want my theory to be easier. I want the proof to be easier, so I take on this axiom. And as we talk about different geometric axiomatic systems in the future, because there are different ways of developing the axioms for Euclidean geometry as an example, the reason that these different axioms exist has a lot to do with this independence versus dependence. And in our lecture series, we will adopt Hilbert's axioms for Euclidean geometry. The main reason is because they are logically independent axioms. Each and every one of them serves a purpose and you need it to get Euclidean geometry, the removal of any one of them would not give you Euclidean geometry, it would give you a much broader subject. And but how does one actually know whether your axioms are independent or not? Well, to show that an axiom is independent, what you're gonna do is you're gonna construct a model that demonstrates all of the axioms except for the one in question, but then the one in question will actually be negated. So that is to say, if we had four axioms, axioms one, two and three, if you wanna prove that the axiom four is independent, you create a model for which axiom one is satisfied, axiom two is satisfied, axiom three is satisfied, but axiom four is violated. That is the negation of axiom four is a theorem for that model. Because if axiom four was a theorem of axioms one, two and three, that means every model that satisfies axioms one, two and three would have all of the theorems including axiom four. So if you can demonstrate a model that violates axiom four, then axiom four cannot be a theorem of the other ones and therefore it's independent of it. And so constructing a model is how you show that an axiom's independent. And then David Hilbert's great work on Euclidean Geometry, he writes a very long paper that constructs models that satisfy all of the axioms of Euclidean Geometry except for one and thus proving each and every axiom is independent of the other. Now, if you wanna show that a axiom is dependent, you actually provide the proof of that axiom as a statement of the other axioms. And so to prove dependence, you provide a proof. To provide independence, the proof is actually a model. And so that's what I wanna provide here in this video here. I wanna show you that axiom one of the FIFO theory is independent, okay? Remember axiom one told us that there are exactly three fees in the system. So I need to come up with a model of axioms two, three and four that have not three fees. So I could have less than three fees or I could have more than three fees. So I'm actually gonna come up with a model with four fees. So we're gonna call them A, B, C and D and we're gonna define the foes to be sets of, well, sets of fees. And so there's gonna be four foes in this model here. So one of them's A, B, one of them's A, C, one of them's A, D and then one of them is A, A, C, D. So remember axiom one, axiom one was that there are three fees, exactly three fees in the system. Clearly this is negated because we have four fees. What about the other ones? What was axiom two? As a reminder, axiom two states that any two distinct fees belong to exactly one foe. So if we look at all the possible pairs, A and B, well, there's a set right here, AB, no one else has AB, so that's good. There's AC, you have this set that contains AC, no one else. You have AD, this one contains AD, but no one else does. There's the pair BC, this one contains BC, no one else does. There's the pair BD, this one contains BD and no one else does. And then there's CD, this foe contains CD, but no one else does. So axiom two is actually satisfied, right? Axiom two passes our list. It passes our check, I should say. Axiom three, what was that one? Not all fees belong to the same foe. There is no foe that contains all of the fees. So the first foe doesn't have, it doesn't have C, so it's good there. This one doesn't have B, this one doesn't have B, and then this one doesn't have A. So there's no foe that contains all of the Bs. Excuse me, there's no foe that contains all the fees, so axiom three is satisfied. Axiom four said that 82 distinct foes contain at least one fee that belongs to both of them. So when we look at pairs of foes, the first pair both contains A, that's good. If we look at this one, AB, AD, they both contain A, so that's so far good. If you look at this one, they both contain B, all right? So AB is good. If we look at AC and AD, they both contain A. If you look at AC and then BCD, they both contain C, that's good. Then if you look at AD and BCD, they both contain D. So every pair of foes has at least one that's on both of them. So it satisfies axiom four. So you'll notice that axioms two, axioms three, and axioms two, three, and four are all satisfied, but axiom one is not. Therefore, since we have a model for axioms two through four FIFO theorem, FIFO theory, but axiom one fails, this then shows that axiom one is independent of the other axioms. And I'll leave it as an exercise to the viewer here to prove that axioms two, three, and four are likewise independent. To prove that axiom two is independent, what you would do is you would construct a model where axiom one is true, axiom three is true, axiom four is true, but axiom two is false. That would show that it's independent. If you wanted to show that axiom three was independent, construct a model where axiom one is true, axiom two is true, axiom three is false, and axiom four is true. A similar statement can be done to show that axiom four is independent. But like I said, I'll leave it up as an exercise to the viewer here. To finish up lecture two, I wanna throw a little bit more vocabulary about axiomatic systems. We say that an axiomatic system is inconsistent if a statement and its negation are both theorems of the axioms. We say that an axiomatic system is consistent if it's not inconsistent. So I should mention that in an inconsistent system, all statements are actually both true and false. So we say the system's inconsistent if a statement and its negation is both true and false, right? They're both theorems. So that is a statement is both true and false simultaneously if it's inconsistent. But if one statement is both true and false, so p and not p are theorems, then in fact every statement is both true and false. And it basically follows by a proof by contradiction, right? So it's like take statement a, all right? The proof, the proof is assume not a. Well, then you say p, then you say not p, you get a contradiction.  So you just proved a, but a was arbitrary. We could have done this exact same proof and prove not a, right? Well, to do that, you would assume not not a, which is just to say you just assume a, then you say, then you do p, then you do not p, you get a contradiction, then you conclude not a. And so now we've proven that a and not a are both theorems of the axioms. So in an inconsistent system, every statement is true and every statement is false, which makes the axiomatics there completely useless. So for this reason, it's important, it's, we don't use inconsistent systems on purpose. The problem is we don't always know if our system is inconsistent. For this reason, it's helpful to determine whether a system's inconsistent or not.  It's pointless, you don't care about it. We only care about consistent axiomatic systems. How do you know if a system is consistent? Well, if a system has a model, if there is a model of the theory, then that proves that the system, the axiomatic system is consistent. An inconsistent system can't have a model. Consistent ones have models. So if you can provide me a model, then you know the system's consistent. But this can get a little bit problematic because the model might depend on other logical systems. Like in mathematics, we often use, we often interpret models via set theory, ZFC set theory to be precise. So the consistency is then contingent upon the language for which the model was constructed. So if our model depends on set theory, then our system is only consistent if set theory is consistent. And this is a question I'm not gonna delve into into these lecture series, whether ZFC set theory is consistent or not. Again, that's a conversation for another one. So oftentimes we have conditional consistency, but if we produce a model, then we know the system is consistent and not inconsistent. So models are very important for that reason alone. But then another important thing to talk about is completeness. We said that an axiomatic system is complete if every statement or its negation is a theorem of the axioms or not. So you either get A or not A. So we don't want both A and not A, but we would love it if you get A or not A in an exclusive sense, right? Every statement is either true or false. The problem is when your axiomatics get too complicated, then we get incomplete statements. That is to say that you can get new statements that are then independent of the previous ones. So in a nutshell, we don't expect models to be complete. I mean, like the FIFO theory we've developed, so far actually is a complete model. Those four axioms we have about FIFOs determine all of the, those axioms determine every model. That is to say in a complete system, in a complete system, uptie some morphism, there is only one model. And for FIFO theory, there's only one model. You have the fees, which are X, Y, and Z, and you have the foes, which are gonna be X, Y.  And then belonging is just set containment. Uptie some morphism, every model is this model right here. It's a complete theory. But most theories and mathematics are incomplete. That is to say there are gonna be some statements which are not true or false. That's because you could take on that, you could take on that statement or its negation as a new axiom and thus get a new theory. Like take group theory, for example. Group theory is incomplete.  Those are the three axioms of group theory. It's incomplete because we can't determine is the operation commutative or not because there exist groups, which are the model of group theory, which are non-commutative, and there exist groups which are commutative. And so group theory is incomplete because I can't say everything, I can't say anything about whether it's commutative or not. And that's not necessarily a problem. It's like, oh, okay, I'll just add a new axiom. I'll have a theorem just for commutative groups that we call abelian groups, or I'll have a different theorem for non-abelian groups maybe. And so this incompleteness is not such a big deal as some people sometimes fret about, right? Like the Gödel incompleteness theorem says that any axiomatic system that can perform basic arithmetic, basically you can embed the natural numbers into, is incomplete. And so the axioms of geometry, such as Euclidean geometry, will actually be incomplete because you can do arithmetic with Euclidean geometry. And so this incompleteness statement means that there will be some theorems we can't prove because they're not actually theorems, right? They're independent of the axioms. Again, we're not gonna worry so much about that because honestly these incompleteness theorem, these incompleteness proofs usually involve like silly self-referential statements that really are only studied by logicians. But like if you take the group theory example like is the operation by the commutative or not, that's a relevant statement. Not all groups are commutative, but we actually accept that because we know, okay, this statement's independent and we can then refine our axioms by adding new ones if we need to. So I do want you to be aware of the idea of completeness and incompleteness, but I don't want you to fret too much about it. Certainly if you're spending your whole life trying to prove a theorem that's independent of your axiomatic system because it's incomplete, that's sort of a big deal. People ask questions like this with, for example, the let's take the, well, let's take the Riemann hypothesis, for example, it's a pretty big open question still in mathematics. Is it independent of the mathematics we're trying to prove it in, right? Is it both true and false? Not in an inconsistent saying that just with different models. Is there one model of mathematics through which the Riemann hypothesis is satisfied and another one where it's not? That would be very interesting to know, right? And honestly, I would probably consider that a solution to the millennial problem there because if you take the continuum hypothesis from set theory, it has been proven that the continuum hypothesis is independent of ZFC set theory. There exist models of ZFC set theory, which satisfy the continuum hypothesis, but there are others which then negate the Riemann, the continuum hypothesis. So then we can develop set theory using one or the other. The question that kind of comes down to that one is that as mathematicians, what does our set theory do? Does it satisfy continuum hypothesis or not? And this is a question that set theorists will continue to debate into the future.


The Monkey's Paw is a sacred relic, the preserved hand of Saint Bonzo the Unfortunate, martyred more or less three times during the great reconciliation of the Holy Church. Blessed by the first banana tree, Bonzo worked many miracles before his third and final death. After his death, Bonzo's hand was fixed to the end of a golden scepter and retains miraculous powers to this day. Enemochistan, who holds it, may make three wishes which are granted by divine grace, but if their soul is not pure, their wishes will bring them despair instead of happiness. So it was with my master. Monkeyhoti, a retainer of the Lord of La Mancha, undertook a great quest to find the paw. After many trials, he found the relic and brought it back to La Mancha. He was tasked to bring the paw to his lord but could not resist temptation. He made two wishes and despair followed. For his first wish, my master asked for one million bananas. He was hungry, you see. For his second wish, my lord sought power. He wished to become a Don, a lord. He wished to become Don Quixote. But this did not happen. Instead of Don Quixote, he became Don Quixote, transformed from a monkeestin into a donkey. The transformation drove him mad. But that was just the beginning of the trouble. One million bananas. This is an unimaginably rich horde who La Mancha had a priceless heap of bananas. And every lord in Moquista came to claim a share of the treasure, the war that followed devastated La Mancha, leaving it empty and without a lord. Thus, you find it and my master.