What's going on, everyone? Sam here with late sports cards, ripping 22-23, Deany Recon basketball hobby, six box, half case break, number 24. Pick your team style, read off a list of our names on our teams. You've got Erin L with the Heat, R&D Blazers, Boss S Sons, Ben C Warriors, Billy D with the Knicks, Brian M Nets, Chris A Bucks, Chun W W Thunder, Evan E Lakers, Evan R King Sixers, Jeffrey C Wizards, Hunter B Nuggets, Wang J Cavs, Won NG with the Grizzlies, Jeremy H Magic, Jet I with the Raptors, we've got Kevin S Celtics, Latida with the Hawks and the Mavericks, Luke M Pelicans, Marcus H Rockets, Michael H Pistons-Pasers, Robert R with the Bulls and Spurs, Scott T Clippers, Tony Y, Timberwolves, Victor F Hornets, and Wang Z with the Jazz. Good luck, everybody. Again, up next is going to be Optic, another couple of teams coming in. Appreciate that. Let's get going. I think Allie just took the Hawks. Hawks are another good team in that with A.J. Gryff. Still a draft A.J. Gryff in that is. Still a draft A.J. Gryff in the U. Forget about that. No, you can't forget about that. You'd be a fool to forget about it. There's a hollow dots. Oshaid Baji on the super short print. Nice one there. Grats on that jazz. You can throw that one in the recap. Foltz, Mobley, and Derek White. Derek White out of the game. A.J. Gryff. Still a draft A.J. Gryff in the rookie rookie. Jimmy Butler, Q199. Hemi Butler. How low, rookie? Jimmy Buckets. Have you seen the, there's a stat. Future Legends, Jabari Smith, rookie. That's since campaign to 199 and Walker Kessler rookie. Since Jimmy Butler went to the heat, he has like 37 playoff wins and the Sixers have like 20. That's insane. Keegan Murray, rookie, rookie. Christian Coloco, and more base. Again, always just going to be base on the back once you're past like the first three cards or so. Ja, Lonzo, John Wall, base, base, base. No rookies or anything on the back. Rookie will be generally the third or fourth card depending on how many inserts there are. Jared Allen. There's J9, your rookie to 299. Nice one there for the Pistons. There it grows. And base. Once you hit your first base card on the back, then it's just going to be base for the rest of the pack. That's what I've noticed. KD, Sexton, Grant, Boloch, Desmond Vane, Scottie Barnes. Kade, Vector. Herbert Jones to 299. First auto. Kevin Harris to 99 for the magic. Kevin Harris. Since this is a later release, too, they have a lot of rookies that weren't in like prism and stuff. Have autos for this, which is cool. Like Simone Fontecchio in the Jazz to 99. Shake Milton. Marjanbo Champ. Nice one there for the Bucks to 99. We'll take that. Again, Bucks are still available in Optic as well. Definitely a solid team. Wow. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. Ten to go. Wow. Geez, dude. Ten to go now in Optic. Let me drop you that link again. Teams have been marked down a second time. A second time. Ten to go. Let's get that filled up. And then once we get the two Optic breaks filled up, we're into Inception Divisions. X, Benedict, Cumbermatch, Matherin on the skies of the limit. Dyson, Daniels, Rookie, and base. This is the A tier nickname right there. S tier nickname. S tier. Where's K-Riz at? Over. Definitely right top 5 in the match right now or something. To 99. Pascal Siakam. Jayden Ivey. Getting carried by something. Ten to four. Ister playing Fortnite right now. Luca claimed a fame. Or top of the charts, I should say. IQ. Dude, I need to show angles a lot more than he dared to breathe. That is Jayden Ivey. You need to be jingled before you leave. It's 299 Rudy Gobert. Oh, he's in. He's in Optic, so hopefully we'll be getting jingled. He does not have base in this, but he does have colors. Oh, there'd be a frequent jingling going on. It's 299, is KCP. Auto. Tyrese Martin to 49. Nice one there for the Hawks. Grats, Hawks. Moosa Diabatte, and base. Rookie Rookie. Walker Kessler. I think I'm just going to have to bite the bullet and do it. Palo Bancara. Jayden Williams. Heather did buy me. She bought me. It's a pre-marinated chicken breast. She's like, all right, you have to make this while I'm gone. And I haven't done it yet. There's quiet Leonard Rookie review. Desmond Bain to 99. Auto. Jamal Wilkes to 49 for the Lakers. Cool one there. Jamal Wilkes, Benedict Matherin. Rock the Rim is Russ K.P. Jett. Montess Sibonis. Bobby Portis to 199. Marjanbo Champ Rookie. Sexton, and base. Me, Jake, and Rich, saw Simone from Techie outplay in person. The legendary Rookie was in this set. Yeah, for the Jazz. Buck's gone in 38. Knew they were gone. Knew they were going to be gone. Should be down to nine, that means. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine. Oh wait, no. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10. Still at 10. That might have been in the other one. Yeah. Yeah, Buck's gone in 38. That's what it was. And guys, 10 to go. I'll be Facebook that if you don't mind. 10 to go on. Optic. Again, still some good seams left. Good value left as well. Pretty much always with Optic, going to be good value.  L'Arabia. Need the Pet, that gold vinyl. That's what we need to be pulling here. Magic that bird. Yeah. Chet Holmgren Rookie Rookie. There's Dylan Brooks to 299. Simone from Techie. Oh, there he is. Let's go, baby. Jazz legend. Zach Levine. Yannis. Klaxden. Fleet Beat. David, or Donovan Mitchell. Doug McDermott to 299 for the Spurs. Dougie, make a buckets. Kobe White to 199. Malachi Branham Rookie. There you go. Bobby. Rock the rim and bead. Drew Holliday. Lonnie Walker to 49. Santy Aldema to 99 for the Grids on the second-year order. W Grids. Like that one, that was pretty good. All systems go. Kevin Durant. I swear to God, that was an insert and something else at one point. Yeah. Jalen Durant. Oh, just wait. I've got a great stick for one of the new cards coming out too. And Optic. It's going to be good. It's going to be pretty frequent too, which makes it even better. Al Horford to 99. We've got a Johnny Davis, two of ten. True potential gold auto. This one there for the Wiz. Wizards picking that one up. Johnny Davis, Wisconsin Badger legend. This was once a case hit in Grand Reserve back in 2017. God, I remember Grand Reserve, dude. Oh my God. What a throwback that was. I was thinking about older card sets. Like Panini Brilliance. That was awesome. Timeless Treasures. Panini Threads was also good. Thai, Thai, Washington. Jalen, how are you, Durant? There used to be a lot of really good... I mean, there still is a lot of good sets. I'm going to be wrong. I'm not... Jalen's Little Russell, that is going to be number 299. Not saying that there's bad sets or anything out there, but there used to be some really cool ones in addition to what we have now that have no longer been made. At the top of the charts, Dirk, Blake Wesley, D'Angelo Russell again to 199 this time. I'm going for that rainbow. Jeremy Sohan, rookie. Peyton Watson for the Nuggets, too, 199. A bit appealing on that one. Send an empty box and wrap it with Denver. Sorry about that. Do apologize, Denver. If you'd like to try to get that one replaced. Malachi Brandham to 299. Future legends, Chet. Mitchell Robinson, auto. Isaiah Stewart to 99. Beef stew for the Pistons. Nice one there. Pistons also speaking of Pistons. Now gone in the next one down to nine. Nine to go in optic, everybody. Thanks again. Pistons now off the board. Miles Turner, that is going to be two... five. Two of five. Nice one there for the Pacers. Two of five. Miles Turner. Fee up. Nearly trade, trade rumor, legend. Nice. Anthony Edwards. Jersey numbered one of 75. Called to excellence. Here we go. Minnesota. Congrats on that. Tony Y. Let's go Tony. Congrats, buddy. Nice ant, man. Palo rookie. That was fun. Oh, Kong Wu, big double O to 299. I'm going to send an empty box and wrap it with the Hawks as well. There's more noticeable feeling than normal on the bottom. Oh, empty box and wrap. We're coming your way as well, Hawks. Do apologize there. Again, two boxes left. Okay, guys, optic filled on up. We're almost there. We're at nine. We're in the single digits on optic. J9 of your rookie. James Harden to 10. Nice one there. Three of 10 for the sixes. Rookie review. Yanis. God, he looks so young in that one, dude. Looks like I got to beat him up in that. I guess not in that one. He's pretty jacked in that one, but when he was a rookie when he first came in, dude, thumbs skinny. There's Larry Nantz Jr. to 199. Simone Fatacchio. Legend. Rookie rookie Walker Kuss. Damn it. He's going away, bro. God, that was awful. Fleet feet, Steph Curry. Jabaric Smith, rookie to 199. Rookie Otto, Julian Champagne to 25 for the sixes. 23 already gone. Oh my God. Let's go, dude. Hello. Nice and Daniels. Squatty Barnes. Squatty. Russell Westbrook, Chris Middleton. John Collins. Nice one there to 299. Otto is Benedict Matherin to 49. Let's go. Congrats. Pacers. Very nice. Let's go. Pacers. Ex-Benedict Cumberbatch that is to 49. Malachi Brannum. Tray Murphy to 49. There's J-Dub. True. I mean, I don't even know why I'd bother then, Shane. That's the case. So that's the deal you and Kyle already have. Man, I'm just, I'm SOL, I guess. I'm SOL. Oh, is that you, Michael? You had the Pacers? Let's go, dude. Let's go, Hobbs. I knew you had the Pistons. I thought, I forgot you had another team. I forgot it was the Pacers. Walker Kessler. Markel Foltz to 10. A lot of gold's coming out of this, too. How are you doing? Yeah, I think I'm going to buy an all-new Xbox. I don't know how to do that. World Traveler, Josh Geetie. True Holiday to 299. Two bucks. Mr. Archive. Donnie Archives, baby. To the building. Bradley Beale to 299. Auto. Another beef stew. This time to 125 for the Pistons. There you go again, Michael. A lot of autos coming your way, buddy. Going across the pond. All base there as well. Let's see. What are we down to on Optic now? Down to nine, guys. Nine to go on Optic. And all teams on sale. All remaining teams for sure on sale. Gives. Hallow, future legends, rookie. Jalen Green. Doug McDermott to 199. Auto. Flippelkens, Dyson Daniels, rookie. 43 of 99. Good job there, New Orleans. Hallow, rookie. J. Nivey, rookie, rookie. Colin Sexton to 199. Jeremy Sohan, rookie. Topps, Don Guives. Walker Kessler. And base. Do a quick recap here. We had hollow dots. Super short print. Oshai Gbaji. Miles Turner to five. Auto is Marjanbo Champ. Kevin Harris. Isaiah Stewart. Isaiah Stewart. Dyson Daniels. Santi Aldama. Anthony Edwards. Nice one there. That is Tyrese Martin. Jamal Wilkes. Benedict Matherin. Julian Champagne. And Johnny Davis. The break, guys. Thanks again for the fill. Up next is Optic. Let's fill it up.


Save 10% with my code Bobby10 on raw, organic, grass-fed and grass-finished, freeze-dried organ meats from grassland nutrition. Link in the description box. All right, guys. Welcome back to the channel. If you're new Manu's Bobby, guys, we're gonna revisit Dr. Zakhar Naik again, this time with his video Christian sister accepts Islam after she got her two answers. We know that Dr. Zakhar Naik is the master at giving answers, so therefore I'm very curious to see what the two questions are of the Christian sister that convinced her to accept Islam. With no further ado, let's have a look. Hi, my name is Anna. I want to ask what happens to non-Muslims who have never been exposed to Islam? And what if a non-Muslim says that the miracles of Jesus are bigger than the ones that Muhammad performed? Good question. She'll tell us two questions, basically. What a non-Muslim who says, who has never been exposed to Islam? What happens to them? And secondly, if a non-Muslim comes and says that the miracles of Issa al-Assalam are greater, what happened to them? Point number one, if a non-Muslim comes and tells me that they have not been exposed to Islam, today in this world of science and technology is difficult. Maybe if you ask this question 50 years back, it was possible. Today, in this age of science and technology, especially the media, bombarding misconception about Islam. I would say that hearing about Islam and getting the message of Islam are two different separate things. So sure, you heard about Islam, but what if you only hear the negatives of Islam, then you certainly didn't hear the message of Islam.  Maybe pseudo-Islam, that Muslims are terrorists, Muslims are fundamentalists. Islam is the religion of killing. It degrades the women, it subjugates the women. They may be exposed to Islam, but wrong Islam. Now what happens to a non-Muslim who's not exposed to the right teachings of Islam? I feel if a non-Muslim hears something in the media, or any human being hears something in the media, he should not take it for granted. The Quran says in Surah Ujurah chapter 49 verse number 6, whenever you get information, check it up before you pass it on to the third person. Whenever you get information, it is important that the person checks up whether the information is right or wrong. I would absolutely agree with this and I call this being ignorant and arrogant at the same time, but unfortunately this is 99% of the population nowadays and most of us lead busy lives and we simply do not have the time to research certain things any further. So if you hear something negative on the news, this is all you will get out of it. You heard something negative about a car crash, about a killing, about a religion, so you turn off the TV and go about your life. As far as the message of Islam is concerned, what if a non-Muslim may be living in an island, may be living in Timbuktu, or living somewhere where he doesn't have any knowledge of Islam. First, it's the duty of every Muslim to convey the message on Muslim, irrespective whether we convey or not. Allah says in the Quran in Surah Fusilat chapter number 41, verse number 53, Allah says, Sanuri him, ayatina fil afaqi, wa fi anfusihim, hatta yatabayinanu annuhla, that soon we shall show them our signs in the furthest regions of the horizons until it is clear to them that this is the truth. Allah says that he will show the signs to every human being before the human being died. He will show his signs in the furthest regions of the horizons until it is clear to them that this is the truth. So Allah takes it upon himself that he will convey this message to each and every human being, whether he's born in a Muslim family or non-Muslim family, whether he's born in a Muslim land or non-Muslim land, Allah will give this message to every human being. That's the reason there were some surveys done in 1950 in two tribes. Now these two tribes, the Kapauku tribe and the Austrian Aborigines, these two tribes did not come in contact with modern civilization till as late as 1950. When the researchers went and tried to find out what was their way of life, these people, they believed that God was one. They believed he alone should be worshipped. They believed he did not begot anyone. They did the Sajdah. They did prostration for worshipping that God. It was everything of Islam but a name. So when no external influence comes on the human being, that person submits his will to God. That's the reason our beloved Prophet, Muhammad SAW, said, every child is born in Din al-Fitr. Every child is born in the innate religion. He is born as a Muslim. Our beloved Prophet, Muhammad SAW, said, every child is born as a Muslim. Muslim means a person who submits his will to God. Later on, that person may be influenced by his parents, by his teachers, by his elders. He may start doing fire worship. As they've all been influenced as well. And then we deviate on the wrong tribe. That's the reason when a non-Muslim accepts Islam, the more appropriate word is revert. He was a Muslim, born as a Muslim. He gets converted to a wrong religion, comes back to the original faith. That is Islam. So the right word is revert. So coming to your question, every child, if any child, if you take three children, one born to a Christian, one born to a Jew, one born to a Hindu, isolate these three children completely from any external influence.  Only after external influence, they start deviating and worshipping wrong things and having wrong ideas. This is scientifically proven. Furthermore, sister, where your second question is concerned, that what if someone doesn't know Islam and thinks that Jesus Christ did miracles? Right. I do agree Jesus Christ did miracles. The Koran agrees as well. Sister, miracle is not the test. If you believe in Jesus Christ's peace be upon him, if you read in the Bible, Jesus Christ's peace be upon himself says in the Gospel of Matthew, chapter number 24, verse number 24, says that for there shall arise many false Christ and false prophets and will do wonders and miracles. And if it were possible, shall deceive the very elect. So Jesus Christ's peace be upon him says miracles are not the test. They shall arise many false Christ and false prophets and shall do wonders and miracles. And if it were possible, shall deceive the elect. This is actually absolutely amazing. I never thought about it this way because the Christian claim, the apologetic claim is always that Muhammad is a false prophet. However, if you look into the Bible and take this verse, it is absolutely correct that all of those false prophets come with certain miracles and wonders. And this obviously wouldn't apply to Prophet Muhammad. Strong point. That means Jesus Christ's peace be upon him says miracle is not the test. Miracle does not make a person a God. Miracle does not make a person superior because all the miracles that were done by all the prophets were done by Almighty God himself. All the miracles. All the miracles that by Moses. It's deserving of applause. When he threw the stick, it became into a snake. It was the Almighty God. All the miracles that he said, peace be upon him did. For the Almighty God. Same with Prophet Muhammad's peace be upon him. I will tell you that Islam is the only non-Christian faith which makes an article of faith to believe in Jesus Christ's peace be upon him. No Muslim is a Muslim if he does not believe in Jesus Christ's peace be upon him. We believe that he was one of the mightiest messengers of Almighty God. We believe that he was the Messiah, translated Christ. We believe that he was born miraculously without any male intervention, which many modern Christians today do not believe. We believe that he gave life to the dead with God's permission. We believe that he healed those born blind and lepers with God's permission. The Christians and the Muslims, we are going together. But one may ask, then where is the parting of ways? The parting of ways is that most of the Christians believe that Jesus Christ's peace be upon him was Almighty God. They believe that Jesus Christ's peace be upon him claimed divinity. In fact, if you read the Bible, there is not a single un-Nikyoku statement in the complete Bible where Jesus Christ's peace be upon him. Himself says that I am God. Where's the statement? If, sister, you can point out any un-Nikyoku statement, any unambiguous statement from any worship of the Bible, in which Jesus Christ's peace be upon him. Himself says that I am God, always the worship me, I am ready to accept Christianity today. He always plays the scarf, man. In fact, if you read the Bible, Jesus Christ's peace be upon him said, it's mentioned in the Gospel of John chapter number 14 verse number 28. Jesus Christ's peace be upon him said, my father is greater than I. Gospel of John chapter number 10 verse number 29, my father is greater than all. Gospel of Matthew chapter number 12 verse number 28, I cast out devil with the spirit of God. Gospel of Luke chapter number 11 verse number 20, I with the finger of God cast out devil. Gospel of John chapter number 5 verse number 30, I can of my own self do nothing. As I hear, I judge and my judgment is just for I seek not my will but the will of Almighty God. Anyone who says I seek not my will but the will of Almighty God, he's a Muslim. Jesus Christ's peace be upon another Muslim. He never claimed divinity. He never said that he was Almighty God. He clearly mentioned, it's mentioned in the Gospel of John chapter number 14 verse number 24, he said that the words that you hear are not mine. It's always the same. Look, I'm really wondering at this point if she really just looked like this for 10 minutes straight or if they just took the same shot and just showed it over and over again. I can't believe that she stood like this for 10 minutes straight, man. No chance. One God and Jesus Christ, the words that you hear are not mine but my father's who has sent me. It's mentioned in the Gospel of John chapter number 17 verse number 3, this is life eternal so that you may know there is one God and Jesus Christ who thou hast sent. It clearly mentioned that Jesus Christ was a messenger. It's mentioned in the Gospel of Matthew chapter 19 verse number 16 to 18 that a person approached Jesus Christ peace be upon him and asked him, that good master, what good things should I do so that I shall enter eternal life. So Jesus Christ peace be upon him says, why thou callest me good? Leave aside God, G-O-D. Why thou callest me good G-O-D? For there is only one good and that is the Father in heaven. And if thou want to enter eternal life, you keep the commandments. Jesus Christ didn't say that if you want to enter eternal life, if you want to go to paradise, believe I'm God. He didn't say that you believe that I died on the cross for your sins. What he said, if you want to enter eternal life, if you want to enter paradise, you keep the commandments. And it's clearly mentioned in the book of Acts chapter number 2, verse number 22. That's absolutely correct. And this something actually was shocking to me was rereading the Bible because I found out that yes, Jesus said you should keep the commandments, that the law shall not be broken. However, Christians nowadays somehow assume that the law has been finished, that Jesus came to break the law. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever once you read the Bible. Of Israel, Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God amongst you by wonders and miracles which God did by him and you have witnessed it. What does it say? Jesus of Nazareth, a man approved of God amongst you by wonders and miracles and signs which God did by him and you have witnessed it. Regarding a question of miracles, what does the Bible say? This is why the Christian doctrine then proclaims that Jesus was fully man and fully God. Book of Acts chapter number 2, verse number 22. A man approved of God amongst you by wonders and miracles and signs which God did by him and you have witnessed it. So, all the credit goes to Almighty God. And Jesus Christ was a man. All the miracles were done were done through Almighty God. So, all the miracles, all the... Everything is done through God. Our existence is done through God. Our life itself is done through God. Anything we do is done through God. If we do an impressive feat in sport, it is done through God. If we build a huge skyscraper, it is done through God. No matter what we do, it is contingent upon the existence of God and therefore it all comes from God. Obviously. The messenger did what done by Almighty God. They came to testify there was one God. But Jesus Christ also said in the Gospel of John chapter number 16, verse number 12 to 14, that I have many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. For he when the Spirit of truth shall come, he shall guide you unto all truth. He shall not speak of himself. All that here shall he speak. He shall glorify me. Now this prophecy is prophesied no one but the last and final messenger, Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. So, if you're a true Christian and if you believe in Jesus Christ, peace be upon him. Jesus Christ, peace be upon him said, I have many things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now. For he when the Spirit of truth shall come, he shall guide you unto all truth. He shall not speak of himself. All that here shall he speak. He shall glorify me. This prophecy is prophesied no one but the last and final messenger, Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. So, if you're a true Christian, you should believe in the last and final messenger, Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. Let's see if you're very Chinese. I just want to tell Dr. Zakir, actually I am a revert and I was just asking questions on behalf of my nomism family and friends and I just wanted to say, you know, subhanallah and la ilaha illallah. What? She tricked us all. Unbelievable. What a scam. That's where she kept that look going. These shots. Dr. Zakir got fooled. Welcome, welcome to the religion of peace, sister. May Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala reward you and grant you jannah and pray to Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala that and may Allah subhanahu wa ta'ala guide you. And if you have any questions, sister, regarding to help your other family members come back to the right faith, to revert your most welcome to us, any question, sister. And you have any clarification, your most welcome. There are many Dawah centers here in Dubai. There are many sisters organization. You can contact them inshallah if you have any queries. And now if you have any questions regarding to convince your other family members, your most welcome to our system. All right. So this is it for today's video. Pretty good acting there. She got us all fooled, including Dr. Zakir Naik here. 10 minutes straight, she kept that face. But after all, she asked a good question or as Dr. Zakir Naik would say. Sister, that's a very good question. As I said in this video here and in many previous videos before, I of course agree with most points made here. I personally am not a Trinitarian Christian. I personally do not agree with the divinity of Jesus. I do not see Jesus as being God and human at the same time, but not to 50 50, but to 100% equal to 100% etc, etc. You name it. That is a doctrine of confusion to me personally. It never worked. I always prayed to the father and the same applies to my family members. They see God as God and Jesus as Jesus. Now would make the claim, as I made previously, that most Christians, at least intuitively, see it the same way. Only when they get exposed to the doctrines of the church fathers, they start researching further and further into the Trinity, and then they start debating for it. Then they start adapting this, in my opinion, manmade ideology. I do not believe that God ever revealed himself as a Trinity. And if he did, I would believe we would have found it in the Bible as well. Alright guys, but this is it for today's video. If you liked it, leave a thumbs up. If you haven't subscribed already, guys, please do so. And if you want to support this channel, all the links are in the description box below. Thank you so much for your ongoing support, guys, as always may God bless you all. Much love and peace.


Jaquory, do you think country artists are smarter than rappers? I'm pleased to feel that way. I am just saying because this person just broke down basically talking about how rappers aren't moving smart these days. This is inside from an exec and we're talking about what if you were doing five million streams in less than a month? That's what this country artist was doing and in this clip he's about to break down exactly how the country artists deal with structure and there's gonna be some things to take from it. So if you want to hear the inside of a real artist deal doing real numbers and want to kind of think about what you might need to ask for or not this is the clip to watch that and more on this episode of No Labels Necessary.  This is country artist that I was in the middle of a conversation with in terms of a deal. He and I want you to tell me what you think. He did probably about five million streams in less than a month on this one song. He had two songs out right and it was going probably like 400,000 a week probably now three months out I think almost at 17-18 million. 400,000 a week. That's crazy. Nice little bit of momentum. I love that and he's at 17 million about right now. Go ahead and say about how much money was that probably 17 million. 17 million probably somewhere between like 50 and 80k depending on where it's coming from. All right. So this is where he is. All right. About 50 to 80k in terms of amount of money and now let's go further. How much do you think that deal was? 7-18 million. In three months. No, no, no. Total right now. Somebody had 17 million streams they doing by half a million. Is the song good? Are you signing more than one song? It was for a project. It was for that song and another song that he had out. It was just him. So just one project and those two songs are on it? Yeah. That question was a good. It's very important. Yeah. Y'all think people don't be caring about good music. Now these execs know the difference between good. I got to do this deal to flip this song that's popping because it's doing numbers. But I'm going to look at a song that I know is good differently than I look at a song that's doing numbers that ain't good. 100%. How much is it going to own? 70%. They own the whole thing but it was a license for 70-30. Actually, it was like 80, 25, 25 or whatever, three years, four years. Is the song good? I would say anywhere between 300 to 400k based on you saying the song is good. Because that means that I can go get, I can push this song or put it in certain places and get my money back. Because the song is good. Good music still wins in the end, y'all. All right, there's more to this clip, y'all. But we want to stop for a second and just argue the deal part because he's going to get into some things with the rappers. Some small things on some deals that he personally passed on because with some notable names because of what they were asking for. People who are considered successful. But let's do this. Just a little thought experiment for the exercise. Corey's going to argue why, yo, that's 75k. He should have taken a bigger deal. Ray Daniels basically projected, you know, roughly speaking, he could have taken 300 to 400k. And we've seen, we know people who have been in a position where they could take a 300, 400k and they'll take that or they'll be arguing for more. I'm going to argue for the country artist. Just for the sake of exercise and hopefully we get something out of it. You ready? Let's do it. All right. So why was his decision busted to go with the 75k? Well, I want to start with, you know, I did the projections. We can guesstimate somewhere between 50 to 80k already made based on where in the world, those streams are coming from, what platforms or streams are on. He never said which one. So you've already made the deal amount in three months. It's a new song, right? So we can assume that it's probably going to keep roughly that same momentum for at least two or three months. So we're talking about possibly another 50 to 80k. Damn near guaranteed. You know what I'm saying? In the next two or three months. And now you had double the deal in what a sixth of the time of the amount of the contract. It won't be because I remember you said three to four year license. So we're talking about six months. You've made, you know, you've made just way more in less time than whatever it's going to be. So there's the argument of like, hey, like you could just not sign a deal and keep all of this money and be in the same position you're about to be in.  Like you better argue resources. Resources are nice. Resources are nice. You know what I'm saying? But resources also. Well, hold on. Don't multiple point me. You're right. You're right. Don't multiple point me. I'm bad. I'm bad. I'm bad. Let's stop here. Because just based off of what you said, if I made 50 to 80k within three months, right? I've already made this $75,000 that I'm about to get from somebody else, right? And let's be clear. This is a loan, right? They're not giving me this money. Yeah. All right? Oh, you said a loan. A loan. Yeah. So I got to respect the fact that this is a loan. Let's clarify that when they give you this 75k, they give me this 75k. This is a loan. This isn't just my money free. I got to pay them back. Yeah. In the following three months, you said I probably make in this guesstimation 50 to 60, 70, right? In the following three months. So basically I pay that loan back in three months, right? But your argument is I could have just kept that money. I would have had 140k in my pockets, right? But I chose why to go ahead and do this deal. A couple reasons. One, resources are nice, but it's my entry point also into building a bigger and better deal situation. All right?  Y'all take these big numbers and put yourself in a ditch that you can't ever pay back. Yeah. Instead, I prefer to pay the money back. And then when I pay that money back, now I'm scot-free. We're good. I'm not stuck in a deal. I can go somewhere else. I can navigate. I'm nimble. And the people that I broke bread with came out happy to I delivered. And now they're going to have confidence for me to go up. No different than me performing in a small venue. And then the booking agent says, hey, you know what? I'll approve you to be in a 200 cap.  I'm just creating proofs of concept in a low risk way to keep myself to use the label system without ever being trapped by the label system. Come on, bro. I can't. Can I jump ship and then come back to my ship? I just want to leave life for a second and then come right back. All right, bro. Come over here, bro. It's nice over here. We got. No, I do get that. Right. I could. I could see an artist in that. Like he said, but he only had two songs out. So this sounds like a fairly new artist. You know what I'm saying? So we also have to account for just general new artist skepticism, which is very fair and very valid. All of you should have new artists. Right. So I could see him saying like, hey, maybe the label did offer 340 K.  It's only my second song.  Let me take a small amount to your point that I know I can do it. I can do it. I can do it. I can do it. I can do it. I can take a small amount to your point that I know I can. Cause now if I take a 75 K deal, I'm recouped in two, three months. And no matter what happens after that, yeah, exactly. I'm good. I agree with that. I see that. Now if I come back to my ship with the resources and building the career, he is an artist with two songs that did 17 million streams in three months. There's not an industry professional in the world right now. Not only he couldn't, I don't think to get access to. He also will have the funds to be able to hire them. And he is currently hot. We all know how much industry professionals love a hot artist to be able to attach themselves to. So it's not too many resources that if he swung his momentum now, he could get access to him. And we could argue, I feel like you're going artist education. Does he know the things that he needs to get access to, to push the ball forward? I want to give this guy a bend for the doubt and say, he probably watched his platform for hours and has a massive certain level of music industry knowledge. So maybe at least know I need to hit the base. Let me get a lawyer. Let me get a publicist. Let me get a marketer. Let me get an e-commerce funnel building nigga.  Let me get a booking agent. And a lot of those doors are going to open for him because like I said, he's hot. He did five million streams a month. That is a hot artist. And the music industry loves two things. They love profitable artists and they love hot artists. He is both of those things currently. Yo artist, there's a lot of distributors out there. But if you want a distributor that will take you seriously, not just look at you as a number, then to loss is the platform from you. I'm talking about helping you beyond just putting your music on all the DSPs. That's what y'all are supposed to do. To loss actually helps you with your money. I'm talking about whoever's a part of the song, dealing out the splits easily. Or more importantly, helping giving you an advance so you can actually create what you need to, whether that's studio time, whether that's your music video, but helping you get money to help fund your career. And most importantly, a lot of these distributors don't really help with the play listing and things like that unless you are a signed artist. You have some kind of serious deal, but to loss has that ability as well. And some of our clients, when they switched over to to loss, they've given us shining reviews. So check out to loss to loss.com and make sure you put in the code. No label. Again, that is no label. And let them know that y'all came from us. It's completely free. Make sure y'all let them know where y'all came from. No label. Let's get back to the episode. Resources do matter. Education does matter. We can assume that he has the baseline. Yeah. We can assume he has the baseline and is going to try to hire some people. But I disagree with the accessibility because you can't put with so many people into the situation where it's fruitful for everybody to be able to work. Everybody can't eat off of the same plate. All right. So he has to select the right people, maybe, but this might be a way of bringing in because they never mentioned the distributor, right? Yeah, they didn't. But this is the way of getting into a situation, but then using it off of one song, I'm using these, well, or two songs, whichever one it is. I'm using these couple of songs as a learning situation. I make the money back so the risk is very low. I pay them back. It is only for a three-year period. I'm making 75 to their 25 off of the profit split. So I'm really just paying them 25%, right? Because I just paid them back money I made. I kind of delayed the money. I forgot it ahead of time, right? I just got the money ahead of time. So if we think about the present value of money, it is worth more today, sir, than tomorrow. Me right? I'm just saying. So I got it pushed. I've got the future to date. You know what I'm saying? Got that money payback easy. 25% got split. And now I have whatever those resources are and I can continue to leverage it for that song while I still own the rest of my catalog. And Lord have mercy. It's trickling down to the rest of it. It's what Russ talks about all the time. And that man looks like he's living pretty wealthy, man. Wealthy and healthy. Wait, you talking about Russ or them? Well, I can say all they all look pretty. They all look pretty wealthy and healthy. I'm talking about Russ, the artist as an example of this young country artist situation. He is, Russ has done the get distribution instead of a whole label. He's done things with parts of catalog to my knowledge. And then it trickles down to the rest of his catalog in terms of ownership and deals and however he's played that system. I don't know the ins and outs of every single detail of his business, but he's leveraged that. And we know artists who have leveraged that. And the risk, if you're going to do something, we know artists who have done a single deal or a two song deal and it didn't turn all that great either. It did not. It did. And you would think that's an argument against me, but when we're talking about the very beginning and the value of that learning to actually see behind the doors and I paid, I didn't really pay my tuition. I got fronted some money to go through these doors and then just paid it right back. The education and shortening that timeline to me is what a lot of this game is worth because most of it is knowledge based. This is an industry where it's built on hustle and knowledge. And that's why it can get so gritty and political because it's not based on like a like hardcore on true skill and meritocracy. There's so many ways to get in knowledge and hustle, right? So if I can shorten the time span in which I can learn, like borrow resources, borrow knowledge any way I can. And I could do it for a low risk like that. Then. Amen. Bravo. Bravo. No, I do agree with that. I didn't think about that perspective to come back. I'm not all the way back on the ship. I'm like on the bridge to foray back over there. That's a good point. Right. Like I get to basically learn how the major label system works for free. And like I said, he's two songs in. So this is very clearly a fairly new artist. You know what I'm saying? So his mind is his or her mind is going to be blown when they get over there. You know what I'm saying?  You know what I'm saying? There are certain label resources that the more I've learned about labels, I've learned a harder to get access to. Right. Like you talk about like, you know, certain things like, I don't want to say like it's hard to get into. Let's say like the world is sinking.  Now I'm saying you can't do it. You know, knowing label artists. But if I had to argue between who going to get that for commercial faster, probably going to be the artist at Universal Sony or Warner. You know what I'm saying? Before it report. Before the any artist. You know what I'm saying? So there are some of these things where, you know, I think it would be easier to get access to. And the beauty of a label in a lot of scenarios is they are, they know and are thinking about things that you wouldn't have ever even thought to think about. Because sometimes they're having conversations. You don't know what you don't know. Yeah, exactly. Like sometimes they're, sometimes they're moving on deals. Yeah.  You don't, you don't even know it's happening. You know what I'm saying? Yeah. You know what I'm saying? I can't, I can't say that. But it's like, hold on. I get what you're saying. Yeah. I'll say it this way. I got you. I got you. If I know, hmm, NFTs are about to change the game. Mm-hmm. Unless pretend they actually did change the game in the timeline people pretended. And this is six months before NFTs come in and change the game. And I'm doing a partnership with the biggest NFT company in the world. They got three billion dollars. They're about to put behind it. You random indie artists have no idea. Mm-hmm. But I have all the inside information because I'm doing a direct partnership. They're reaching out to me because I got all the assets. I have all the IP. They're going to need to do their thing. So now I can position it to be in the best position for when that industry change occurs. Yeah. Exactly. And you know for a bag that you didn't even know existed. You didn't know it was available. And there's many versions of that. The NFT thing, you know, y'all are aware of that and that didn't happen that way. But just pretend like there are companies, because this happens at plenty of times, the companies are always going to come to the place with the leverage, all right? Especially when we're talking about unlocking in the music industry, usually they want to do deals with the IP. There's one partner who's going to unlock a huge network that instantly makes my platform valuable. Yep. Right? So that's why I hope where Apple goes, not Apple, Spotify, go to three people and then bam, things unlock. And that's most of the music in the world. Right? Yeah. It's a beautiful thing. Yeah. Now, first of all, you like the air condition over here on this boat, don't you? The air condition? Yeah. You got air condition down low. Y'all don't got it inside of your boat, huh? Stop, bro. Stop, bro. Because on my boat, my boat of independence, what we have is grit. What we have is determination. What we have is a sparkling zest for life that's going to drive us and fuel us forward into areas unknown. You know what drives and fuels us forward? Fuel. Oil. Well, that's nice. That's nice. I think this independent artist, this country artist made a great decision for him. And I think that is the point that they're making. Let's play this last bit of the clip, too, so we don't get too far off it so y'all can kind of hear what he's referring to in these deals and how execs are thinking as well. Young man from Austin, Texas was asking for $75,000. That's good. That's amazing. That's amazing. Amazing. My point is, if it was a rapper. A million. And again, that's why when I say I passed an ice spice and I passed on this and I passed on that is because couldn't justify the numbers. Unfortunately, what our community does is we try to take advantage. We think that this is the I'm going to get rich. No, this is the first or second or third step to get there, right? Let me help you. Oh, I'm glad he said that. The short term mentality and we train, especially the hip hop drama to think that this is programmed to think this way.  I'm hitting a lick and getting over on them. Not realizing I'm digging a hole for myself. I hit a lick, got this quick 300,000, got this quick million. The guy in the background, I think he said a hip hop artist would ask for four to five million. That's what I think he said. Ray Daniels just doing some quick calculations. Fair enough deal, three or four hundred thousand. All right. But this got passed on deals with artists. Why? Because what I've told artists before, you can do deals and negotiate however much you think you can, right? But what you're negotiating to, it's not charming charisma that's being used to get more money than you're worth and get over on somebody. You know what's happening? What you're negotiating for is to get everything that you can get. And I know it sounds like a new one. It's like, yeah, of course that's what you're getting. No, what I mean by that is the accounting has a number that they can go up to. This is hard numbers that they're looking at. The person you're talking to, right? Doing a deal with they get told, hey, you know, you can do a deal somewhere in this range. They, if they really like you, they're willing to go up and up and up as high as they can. They really like you or they really feel like you're negotiating hard and we're willing to figure it out. But when they report back to accounting, accounting's black and white. They don't even know who you are. They don't even understand who your music, the person you're talking to might actually really rock with you and want you there, but they cannot go over the number. The number is the number. There's more artists out there, man. Statistically, like that's our accounting thing. And like, yeah, what's the big deal? Like, okay, this guy, whoever insert great artist's name that you think is great. Oh, no, that number doesn't make sense. So you're negotiating to get the max worth there and you're just fighting to figure out what that number is. That's what I look at it as, right? So even when you think you're getting over and a savant negotiating this great deal, in a lot of these cases is not, right?  And on the other side, at the same time, you're putting yourself in a worse position or a harder position to get out of that seems great in the short term, but it fucks up your flexibility. Nah, you just dropped the gym too, man, because that is the silent enemy that a lot of artists don't even think about or know exists. It's the finance department at the label. So many times they think it's the label owner or the A&R's or the head of whatever department. Nah, it's the finance team, bro.  They don't care. Their job is to make sure the label is profitable at the end of the year and they're going to step on next if they need to. They're going to kill dreams if they need to to make sure that goes in because that's how their job gets secured. Make sure the books are good and we are at the end of the year. So yeah, nah, that's something. Yeah, bro, that was a bar, bro. And look, you know, we're imagining this huge person whose puppeteer over everything and trying to push and pull has this agenda. Nah, finance department, not that. I'm not saying those people don't exist. Department department, it's just a regular person working there nine to five. I'm looking at numbers. Do they check out or not? It's not malicious. It's business. Business. It's so simple in that way. It's so simple in this way. This math does not work out and that's zero emotion attached. Yeah, and the finance team has been burning me. A lot of these like finance people at labels have been there for a long time. That's probably one of the more secure jobs in places like this, right? And they've seen people like you come and go. They've seen overzealous A&Rs that really believe in somebody and fought for them and that shit didn't work out. So they're burned and they're a silent voice. You know what I'm saying? Tell me one person that cares about what the finance person in the label has to say, other than the execs of the label. The only time you're coming to me is when the deal gets made or new money, but I don't have any say on what to do after that. So this is my only time. The stakes are high.  Like now it's like, damn, you let the A&R make that deal? That's crazy. It's like, no, that nigga really believe, right? He had this twinkle in his eye. He just knew this guy girl was going to be Drake and it's like, but you approve that deal? It's crazy. You're getting persuaded by twinkles now? Exactly. Oh, man. So we want to know what y'all are thinking about this episode. Hopefully that was helpful in terms of explaining some of the sci-fi deal structures and why people go one way or another and why taking most money that you can get is not the best way to go many times over. In my opinion, we had our positions that we had to take for the exercise, but I truly do believe that the best way is to, over time, if you have confidence, it takes confidence that you're actually going to have a career and you're not just here for the moment. If you have confidence you're building a career, take those small steps again and again and again and just get new deals and never have to stress out about paying somebody back and leave it at that. I wanted to be very clear this wasn't exercise before people started calling me stupid in the comments or crucifying me for not having a long term mentality, but I do agree with that position. I think it was smart that he asked for a lower amount. Like I said, he best he made sure the hole that he's in is one that he can just step out of very quickly. Like I said, you get all the benefits to get the learning experience. It really can't be more than that, no matter how it goes. Can't be exactly. Low risk, high reward, and this occasion in my opinion, I'm down. On this occasion in my opinion, this is yet another episode of No Labels Necessary. I'm Brandon Mann, Sean. I'm Cory. I'll see you in the next video.


Hi, I am Manmeet from Khan Academy's localization team. Khan Academy is expanding its content in Indian languages. Did you know that Khan Academy is present in 60 languages worldwide? And in India, we are in Hindi, Punjabi, Gujarati, Marathi, that is coming very soon and some other languages as well. But we don't want to stop. We want to do more. We want to reach to millions of students in their own language and for that we are going to need you. So we are looking for language experts who can bring promising high quality math content to life and in their own language. Here's what we mean. Now we have different models to translate this English content in a regional language. Sometimes we have in-house content creators who do that. Sometimes we do it with school teachers and work with them. Well, we also look for some companies who can do this for us and we are really good at it. Now let's see what makes you an expert. Well, you need to know math, you need to really like it, be passionate, you need to know that language you are applying for really well. And well, if you know both of these, then what are you waiting for? Apply. The description box has what you need. It has the application form. Apply now. The last date is 27 February. Well, you're not going to regret it. It's going to be worth your while because you're going to learn content creation from Khan Academy's experts and get to work with several stakeholders to create large impact in millions of students' lives. Don't wait. We are waiting for you to come this side. Mm-hmm. Description box now.


Jobs and careers with the most automation risk. That's what we're going to be talking about today, but before we get into it, make sure to gently tap the like button in order to defeat the evil YouTube algorithm. On this channel, we talk about personal finance, jobs, careers, and opportunities that will lead you to success. We also talk about avoiding some of the common personal finance traps that so many people fall into. If that sounds like something that interests you, if you haven't done it already, make sure to ring the notification bell, hit the subscribe button so that you never miss an opportunity. Now with that being said, let's jump right into it. This video was based off of an Oxford study that was done a few years back that basically measured how easy it's going to be to computerize or automate different jobs. I'll have that study pop up on the screen right now, the name of it, it's called the Future of Employment. Now in that study, they analyzed all kinds of different common jobs based on three main criteria, and then they also talked about two other criteria that were kind of important. They talked about creative intelligence tasks. So these are tasks that take a lot of creative intelligence, something like making these YouTube videos, you know, takes a lot of creative intelligence, definitely coming up with that joke or a lot of creative intelligence. Anyways, the second thing is social intelligence tasks. So social intelligence tasks obviously would be communicating with other people, understanding the nuance of communication. So an example of that would be knowing that the last joke I told was extremely cringe. The third thing would be perception and manipulation tasks. So generally speaking, this is gonna be where you have to look at something, perceive it in a certain way, and then use your hands, physically use your hands in order to, you know, fix it or change it in some sort of way. So a perfect example of this would be maybe a trade career or a technician. Somebody who has to look at an engine, figure out what's wrong with it, put the right parts in the right place in order to fix it. And then one of the other ones that the study kind of touched on, they didn't get too deep into it, maybe a career can't be automated, but can you change the main skills that you do in that career to a different job that can be automated and can be potentially scaled? So for instance, there are certain products that used to be only sold in a certain setting. So they'd only be sold in a local setting where they could be demonstrated. So you would see them being sold at fairs, at the malls, but nowhere else. You wouldn't see them being sold on a shelf just because of the fact that they have to be demonstrated. Now, that's a job that you could never automate, you know, somebody has to be there to sell them and to demonstrate them. That type of job kind of died a little bit, that particular type of sales job when late night infomercials came out. So why would companies spend tons of money on an entire sales force to go to these different fairs when they could just spend money on one really good salesman, like the OxyClean guy for instance, and then just run a million ads and pretty much reach an audience of hundreds of millions of people. And then the last question, which they didn't really touch on very much in the study, but they did mention a different study that went over that extensively is can a job be outsourced? So a great example of this is graphic design. You can actually get some really good graphic design work done by outsourcing that to other countries. It's gonna be quite a bit cheaper just because the cost of living is gonna be lower in other countries. So first one on the list is going to be data entry keyers. So there's more to it than this, but basically you are going to be looking at data in one place and then entering that data into another place. Now the study showed that this has a 99% chance of being automated and there's a really good website that actually uses this study. It's called willrobotstakemyjob.com. So they show a 99% chance of being automated. They also do a poll where people can actually vote whether they think it's gonna be automated or not and about 94% of the people who voted also agreed that it was going to be automated. So with this one, there is 159,000 jobs available and they make around $34,000 a year. So let's talk about the big categories here. Data entry, generally speaking, does not involve very much creative intelligence. It's very simple work where you take data from one place and then you key it into another place. So for instance, you might work for a financial firm and you're doing data entry. A bunch of different companies release their financial numbers and you would take the financial numbers from those companies in different sectors and then put that into a spreadsheet. This doesn't take very much creative intelligence at all. There's also a lot of apps and stuff out there where you can literally just take a picture of something and then it will put it in like a Word document format. So you can take a picture of a PDF or you can even take a picture of writing sometimes if the handwriting's not too bad and it will put that in a Word document format for you. It's getting better and better at sorting data and making sure that they have the right words. It also obviously doesn't take very much social intelligence. You're not going to be like telling anyone else. You're basically just going to be putting it from one place to another. Perception and manipulation tasks. I guess you could say that you are typing it in but the thing is is a robot wouldn't need to type it in. It would write it automatically and it would do it like 10 or 20 times faster. Can it be replaced by a better alternative that can be scaled? Absolutely it can. So like I said with those programs that just automatically put data in a certain place you can like take a picture of something and it automatically stores it. Sure those programs are going to be off sometimes but you could have somebody go in afterwards spend way less time just making sure that there's no huge errors. You could also very easily outsource this. You could teach somebody how to do this that's from another country. So basically this one has a lot of red flags. It would be very easy to automate or outsource this and it probably will be done within the next 20 years. Next one on the list is going to be library technicians. Now library technicians are basically responsible for just assisting librarians with the basic day-to-day tasks. So for instance they might help librarians put books back in the proper place that people have checked out. They have a 99% chance of being automated and the polls, the human polls say that there's about an 80% chance so still pretty high. They make around $30,000 a year. There's 184,000 jobs available and unfortunately it is declining at negative 4% over the next 10 years.  Social intelligence tasks doesn't really need too much of that. Perception and manipulation tasks, sure you do have to like pick up the book and put it back in there but that is something that you could train a robot how to do pretty well. Can it be replaced by a better alternative that could likely be scaled? Absolutely. So for instance they could create a robot that when the library is shut down overnight it goes in and it puts books back in the right place. Wouldn't be that hard to do this. In fact I wouldn't be surprised if there's systems out there that do it already. Can it be easily outsourced? Probably not because you do have to have somebody or something like a robot be there to actually put the books back in place. Number six on the list is going to be new account clerks. So generally speaking they're going to work for different financial institutions and they're going to interview people and ask them really basic questions while they're trying to open up an account. So they'd be asking you, what's your birthday? Where do you live? They have a 99% chance of being automated and then the survey shows about a 74% chance. There's 41,000 jobs available and they pay around $36,000 a year. So when it comes to creative intelligence tasks, again this is almost like a data entry sort of position.  Social intelligence tasks. You could argue there is a little bit of social intelligence here. There's a lot of people that are still out there that would rather talk to a physical person. An example of this would be online banks versus physical banks. I've made videos about this but online banks are way better. Like you get way better return if you put your money in a savings account for instance. However there's a lot of people that are just more comfortable with a physical bank where they can actually go there, talk to people, maybe even form relationships with the people who work there, drink their free coffee and eat their free cookies. Perception and manipulation tasks don't really need much there. They would basically just be keying information in which you could have a robot do that for you or you could have a software program. Can it be replaced by a better alternative that can more easily be scaled? Absolutely. You could have somebody just set up their own account. All you would have to do is just have them complete a short survey where they set up their own account. Can it be easily outsourced? Absolutely. Very basic and you could easily just in the same way that you outsource customer service you could outsource having people set up accounts. Number five on the list is going to be tax preparers. These are the people who prepare your taxes. Now this isn't like the high level accountants that you know big businesses have. This is just your basic everyday you know taking basic information in and preparing taxes for you. The truth is taxes are pretty simplified especially these days. For most people just taking the standard deduction is going to be the best option for them. That's why you've seen these programs like TurboTax getting so popular and this one has about a 99% chance of being automated and 77% of people agree that that's what's going to happen within the next 20 years. Now there's about 66,000 people employed here and they make around $49,000 a year. So when it comes to creative intelligence it's very, very basic here. It's almost like a data entry type of job again. Social intelligence, this is the one part where you could potentially say that there might need to be some social intelligence. Some people prefer to talk to a real person when they're doing their taxes. Perception and manipulation, again not very much it's basic data entry. Can it be replaced by a better alternative that can easily be scaled? Absolutely. What I just mentioned TurboTax. You put your own information in there it makes it super easy. You can literally do your taxes in like 30 minutes.  You don't have a mortgage, you don't have any fancy stuff like that. Most of the time it's very easy to do it and it only takes about 30 minutes. Can it easily be outsourced? Absolutely, you could easily outsource some of the basic data entry stuff that comes with this position. Number four on the list is going to be cargo and freight agents. So these are going to be the people who are moving cargo a lot of the time when you see on the flights the people that are putting your luggage into the airplane. They have a 99% chance of being automated and 73% of people agreed with that. There's around 92,000 people in this job and they make around $46,000 a year. So creative intelligence doesn't take much creative intelligence. Social intelligence, again not much social intelligence although if you're smart hopefully you're going to be nice to people's luggage so you don't break stuff. Perception and manipulation tasks this is the one spot where you could make an argument. You do have to move the luggage and try to be gentle with it so you don't break stuff. However, this does seem like a job that could be automated. I mean think about it like this. You know how when you get off the plane and then you go and there's basically a conveyor belt that brings the luggage to you? What if there was another conveyor belt that they just put next to the plane and you just dropped your luggage off on that and you could easily just set up a system where it puts the luggage directly into the plane. At the very least you would need less people to do the job, maybe you would still have to have somebody who just makes sure that everything's being done correctly but you'd probably need less people. Number three on the list is going to be insurance underwriters. So insurance underwriters are gonna be the people who evaluate insurance applications and they decide whether they are going to accept the application or not. And if they do decide to accept the application what terms are they going to use? There is a 99% chance they'll be replaced and about 71% of people agree with that. They make around $70,000 a year. There's 114,000 jobs available and it's growing at negative 6% and so it's basically going to be declining by around 7,100 jobs over the next 10 years. Now when it comes to creative intelligence not very much.  This is actually very similar to applying for a credit card.  Sometimes they'll need a little bit of extra information. Once in a while they'll even have you call in and talk to a person that will enter in that information for you. But usually it's just gonna tell you right off the bat whether you were accepted or not. So a lot of this job can be automated. They can just have a person enter this information in on their own. So it can basically be replaced by a better alternative that can be scaled. And even if there is a person who has to physically manually look at it that task could very easily be outsourced. Number two on the list is going to be title examiners, abstractors, and searchers. So these are people that will search for a lot of the time for example real estate records. They'll search both private and public records in order to compile a list or a database of people who have mortgages for instance. There's a 99% chance that they're gonna be automated but only 60% of people actually agree with that. So this is on the lower side for a lot of them on this list. Now there's about 52,000 people who are employed here and they earn around $52,000 a year. So when it comes to creative intelligence tasks this does require a little bit of creative intelligence because you have to go to different types of databases in order to search for that data. A lot of the time you're gonna be looking up county records for instance. People have to file records with the county whenever they buy a house. Not all websites are the same so it does take a little bit of creative intelligence in order to search websites to find the correct information. Social intelligence tasks doesn't really require much social intelligence. Perception and manipulation tasks. The fact that you are having to go and search for things means that you're using a mouse and that sort of thing so there's a little bit of that there but not much. Can it be replaced by a better alternative that can easily be scaled? Well there is what's known as web scraping technology and it's just getting better and better at basically finding massive amounts of data that you can scrape from different websites and then putting it into something that you can actually read. This technology is getting better and better. A lot of it is even being influenced by machine learning now. So it might not be quite as good. There might still be some advantage to doing things by hand but the fact that you can have that and it might get let's say 80% of the housing records that are out there and do it way, way, way better. In terms of the amount of time that you have to spend on it and how fast it does it means that it can kind of be replaced and then the worst one is it absolutely can be outsourced. The 20% that the web scraping data misses, you can have people go in there and manually look at that and it can absolutely be outsourced to another country. Number one on the list, this one did kind of surprise me but actually after I thought about it for a little bit it makes complete sense and that is going to be telemarketers. So with this one you've got a 99% chance of automation and 92% of people agree with this. There's 164,000 telemarketers that are employed here in the US and they make on average about 28,000 a year which is much lower than average. Now for the big categories, creative intelligence, you don't really need much creative intelligence to be a telemarketer, most of them actually read off of a script. So it's almost like word for word, they're reading off of a script, pretty much no matter what you say they can get back onto the script. Doesn't really take that much like improbability or creative intelligence just to read off of a script. Social intelligence, there is a little bit of social intelligence that's needed there. Having sales skills is always a good thing. However, the thing that is really bad for this is it can be replaced by alternatives that are very easy to scale. This is what I realized after reading the paper. So instead of hiring let's say like 1,000 telemarketers in order to sell your product, what you can do instead is you can contact a bunch of influencers out in the world that will sell your product and you will not have to pay them a full salary. Or you could just have one person do a video and then you can pay ads to different websites in order to put that video in front of like 1,000 different people. It's not that the ability to sell things over the phone isn't good, I mean it is still a good skill to know. It's just the fact that there are now alternatives where you can sell the same exact types of products in a different way that's much cheaper, easier and much easier to scale. Now on top of this a lot of these things can be outsourced. I mean I'm sure all of us get calls from telemarketers from other countries for instance. If you haven't done it already make sure to gently tap the like button but smash the subscribe button and ring the heck out of the notification bell and comment down below if you have any thoughts, comments, criticisms, et cetera and before you go make sure to check out my other videos right here. I made them just for you.


Her work has appeared in Actually People Quarterly, which is a fantastic zine. The 2015 San Francisco Booth Reader and McSweeney's, her first collection, it hasn't stopped being California here, was published by Carvel and Express in 2014. Please welcome Jordan Karns. Okay, so something you need to know about this essay that I'm going to read, personal essay, is that there's a lot of song lyrics in it, which will make sense later, but just in the beginning so that you're not confused. So this is called You Loose Some, You Feel Me. I want to tell you something, something you will never forget. You can fall for chains of silver, you can fall for chains of gold, you can fall for pretty strangers and the promises they hold. How does it feel to be alone in love when you weren't for a while? Who is the one animal? My love was a red flag kind of love. Now you don't talk so loud. Now you don't act so, so proud. It was a bad idea. Well that's not entirely true. It was either going to be a bad idea or a very fortunate one, a communicative and passionate relationship, a success. It was a bad idea because we shared an ex who was for both of us a tough love, an important but complicated relationship, but I was in love and she was in love and what else is there? We went for it. People called said, beware all you're bound to fall.  Is all love born in a blind spot? Is love blind? People say that. What does blind love mean? That you're blind to the problematic things in your lover? That you're blind to the red flags flapping in the storm swirling at the horizon? All the honest things we told each other no matter how good the beginning and here I am. All by yourself, all of us. I should know better. After we broke up, I couldn't stop thinking about my ex's narrative of our love story. Who is she talking to? What is she telling them? What are they telling her? Are they affirming her narrative? When we finally met up almost a month after breaking up, we fell into the same split level conversation that we'd fallen into so many times before and she said something like, I don't want this to be your narrative which surprised me because what else could there be? I'm obsessed with blind spots. I'm trying so hard not to have any. This is true for my life in general but especially true for the narrative of this love story each of us is telling. It's said that the blind develop other heightened senses in response to losing their vision but do those heightened senses help in perceiving that which they miss from vision? To know something's there even if you can't see it. To know it from experience. To sense or anticipate it. Maybe we'd call this intuition. I did the dumb thing of asking a mutual friend how my ex was doing a few weeks after we'd broken up and still hadn't spoken. I asked her what she thought my ex was thinking and she told me what she might be thinking but then asked, have you considered it from her perspective? To which I died a million deaths because of course I've done this and on repeat for weeks. My ability to hold many perspectives is a big part of my narrative. I saw her point but she couldn't see mine because she couldn't see something in herself that I can see from here. But it still gets me down when I see you around. At times I worry that my narrative is wrong and that I'm overlooking something crucial within this love story, that my ex is actually right, that her narrative is more true and that she holds the power of this truth.  What is the consequence of her narrative being more true? If I'm wrong I've created a whole system of logic around something I'm only partially seeing. If I'm wrong I'm blind to something I don't know and I want to be the one who knows. Well knowing all the angles set me free, maybe. Well it makes me feel better, I hope so. But most of all I don't want to be free. I just want to go back baby, back to the way it was. I think this has something to do with trusting myself, that I'm struggling with trusting my narrative of this love story. You're still standing in my way. Call me superstitious, I've become suspicious of myself, afraid to know what I know. Maybe this is because I invested so much in a person that I'd rather doubt my own intuition than accept that I made a bad investment or that I invested too much. It's a difficult thing to give someone your whole self and have it returned. All by yourself, all of us. How does someone hold power over another person? I want to say truth, that the person with the most truth wins. But I don't think this is true. I don't think holding or giving power has anything to do with truth. It's something else, something already latent and existing long before any love story, before any lover. Something within yourself that's activated by all that's gone wrong. Something closer to fear. Because I'm working to the bone and you know, you know. What's the consequence of my ex's narrative being more true? That I'm too much, that I was too much, that I asked too much, that no one will ever love me, that I'm too much for a person to love. Who is the one, animal? Give me all of your love. If my narrative of this love story is wrong, I worry I'm a stagnant person. I'm stuck. I'm the disillusioned lover singing a disillusioned love song. But what's wrong with singing a disillusioned love song? Is it so stagnant or pathetic? How does it feel? It feels good, actually. It's a certain relief to stop worrying about the possibilities of truth and perspective within my own love story and indulge in the righteousness of somebody else's. I'm talking about sad songs. Me against the world songs. Something deep down in my soul said, cry girl. So I made a mix. These songs aren't trying to be generous. They're not trying to do anything but put things in a place, in a restraint for a few minutes. And it's in this place that these songs own the narrative of their experiences. Because it's true to them, true to their lives. Because this is a mean world to try to live in. Nobody knows all the trouble I've seen. My days are lonely. Night's getting lonely, too. I tried to please you, baby. I was always true. Give me all of your love. In this way, I began to trust myself again. Turn around, see me running. To indulge, to project my narrative upon these songs has validated my own. It also fictionalized it in the process. I'm aware of the irony that fictionalizing my narrative of this love story brings. As it was my fear of overlooking truth or telling a false story that brought me here in the first place. Traveling at the speed of light and then, at the same time, I'm in the same spot, too. There are other ironies. One being that I teach creative nonfiction to high school students three days a week. In three days a week, I'm breathless trying to explain that no matter how broad the scope of our narratives, we're always leaving something out. We are always curating our experiences and the stories we tell. Emphasizing some truths while omitting others because they don't fit within the desired range. It's funny that in order for me to own the narrative of my experience, I had to fictionalize it. Making a mix took the heaviness of my love story and aired it out with a long line of heartache. It's somebody else's sad song, I'm just singing it. You'll never get away from the sound of the woman that loves you. Love is the blind spot. Or maybe it's just being so close to having the thing you want the most. I think this is called desire, but either way for me this is love. Here I can't see anything else. Here I can't see the other reality of the situation that I don't want to invest in a person who won't invest in return. Blind spots are the nature of consciousness. We keep having them, seeing them, getting new ones. I know I could have loved you, but you would not let me. So I begin not to love you. What we once had is dead and gone. I want more than to know. I want to have learned to be a growing person. And only here is it over. The narratives continue to be told from where the love story ends. But they change so often. I'm willing to forget I still got no regrets. For all the reasons I believe to be true, for her reasons too, it's over. Nobody, nobody, nobody. I've got eyes to see, ears to hear. Just look away and say glory. Thank you. Thank you, Jordan. I really appreciate that. Having just written a narrative about an ax and had to process about it in one month. That was great. Thank you. The next reader up here is Faith Adile. She's the author of the Nigerian Nordic Girls Guide to Lady Problems.


An exciting evening lined up as you must be already aware, we've got a full house, in fact we're wondering how we're going to be accommodating all the wonderful people who are here tonight to hear these wonderful speakers who are going to be addressing this audience very shortly. Another hygiene announcement in case you haven't done so, please drop your business cards at the registration desk because besides the trophies that are going to be won here tonight, there are also some goodie bags that you all can take back home while using the hashtag Indian Marketing Awards, most innovatively. We have a few goodie bags to be given away in between the awards tonight. So go ahead, tweet about Indian Marketing Awards, use that hashtag Indian Marketing Awards and you stand a chance to also be felicitated here tonight. And now, if I am allowed to start, should we set the ball rolling? Yes, it's a hold down, it's better. Is that a yes or a no? You can never really figure it out. Right, yes. Okay, so we're all settled in here and we've made these hygiene announcements. My name is Suparna Chhada, I am the curator for these awards and the event that is going to unfold here tonight as an editorial consultant with the Exchange for Media Group. Of course all of you are aware of the group, it's been in place since the year 2000. Welcome Mr. Dredi. It talks about, it publishes both online and offline news about media marketing and advertising for the past 16 years. This is what's been happening in fact. Today is a special evening because we've got editors of all the flagship products of E4M here. We've got Shravna, I think from it back, we're also probably going to have Priyanka later here. And we've got an amazing lineup of speakers that we're all waiting for. Alright, as is cursory for most of the events that either are curator anchor, I'd like to start by invoking the higher power. Even if you're an atheist that's fine with me, but an old Sanskrit verse which is a Saraswati Mandana has held me in good stead so I'm going to recite that, what it primarily means is the dispelling of the darkness of ignorance through the light of knowledge. In case you are well versed with it, please join me. Or in evenings like these are definitely not possible without the support of our partners. I'd like to formally acknowledge them. This edition of Indian Marketing Awards 2016 is presented by Sakal Media Group, Maharashtra's large media group, and empowered by AndTV, our associate partner who defeat the content platform with 100 million strong audience ever wondered what they can do for your brand. Lakshya Media Group, the largest OOH media conglomerate also. There are a couple passes for Ataj Naik Safari to be won thanks to Lakshya Media Group. Again you will need to drop your business cards outside. We're going to do a lucky tip at the end of the awards for this. SAP, our co-partner daddypaskar.com, world's largest Hindi news website. SCANTA, music partner Sony Mix, Deco Sanogun Gunaw, Gold Partner National Geographic Channel, the world's premium science adventure and exploration destination, knowledge partner traverse strategy consultants, live webcast partner, 24 brings digital in association with the business world. Could we have the partner in these things?


Welcome to the channel. This is Reliable Rudy. Today we're going to pick up on our wayside technology group charting analysis for our part 3 video. In the first video we go over the financial statements. In the second video we plugged in numbers for the company to give us a ballpark range where we're interested in the stock. And lastly we're going to go over the charting. But before we do that, first I am not a licensed financial advisor. Everything in this video contains only my opinion and it's for entertainment purposes only. Okay so going into the chart, here we go. Now I see a few large drops right here. Now I've already looked at the chart and made a few attempts at this video and there is a lot of information to go over in here. So I'm going to try and keep it as brief as possible. But first we're going to put our long-term trend line in. So right through here I want three points of contact. I got three points of contact right here. But also I see a nice trend line right here. Now we're going to dive in deeper on this when we do crack this trend line. Actually we'll do that real quick before we get into more of this analysis. This actually ties into a couple things that I'm going to talk about in this video. See this double top right here? We get a crack of the trend line. See how we're back-testing? Let's zoom right into that. See how when we crack that support we put a couple weeks into the bottom of it. So acting as support multiple times and now acting as resistance. Now I'm going to go more in the depth of this double top on what's interesting about it. But first we're going to take that line out. Now the history of the stock I can see it IPO'd in 1995 and initially has a very large drop right in here. 60%. So let's put a fib tool through that. Now I can see rejected at our first extension and we put this quadruple top in. So there's our top lower high, lower high, lower high. You see that quadruple top right here? Now what corresponds after that? We have a 1, 2, 3, 4. Now look at how on our wave 4 we back-test the bottom of wave 1 and we do get a 5 wave structure. Now this is the start of my long-term trend line. So actually what I'm going to do is I'm going to take that top and we're going to push that through the entirety of the chart. Now I can see from this large drop right here what drop is this? 91%. Now we have not got a full extension on this. Now this transpired from 1998 to 2002 and we have not got a full extension but I can see throughout this chart multiple times. I'm taking my fib tool from this top. Look at how many times we come in contact with this. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. Now when we finally do push that look at how we're trying the hole on top of that. We set this short term double bottom. You see that little bit of a higher low trying the hole on top of that and now we haven't come back since. So we are going to mark that right there and I'm also going to mark as many points of contact along those lines so I was very focused on this wick how we came in contact. Hard rejection off that but all kinds of support built in right there. Now where are those lines at from 19 to 17 and a half? Where do I like the value of the company? I like it at 19 to 17 and a half. I'm very interested in the stock right there. So going back to this here's our long-term trend line. What are the odds we fan out and eventually we revert back to this and revert back to our long-term trend line. This is going to be a buying window for me. We'll touch more into that actually we'll go into that more right now. So if I look at the day chart I can see I also have a gap fill right here. Let's look at that. So let's mark this gap fill out right here. Now I can also see that's a screaming gap by the way. Now I can also see we have a gap fill right here. Is it possible that this turns into a one two three four five wave structure that reverts down to that gap? It is possible. Now if that transpires and we get a five wave structure down to that I could look at that as a wave one. We get a retrace. We get a crack of that support. We get a back test of the bottom of that support where we get our wave five down into where we're more interested in the stock. Very possible if that happens or it is possible that we extend for a full extension. Our full extension is on this particular example is $73. So I'm going to go back to the week chart trying to go quick through this. I'm going to pull this back over right here and we can see that our full extension is $75. What are our full extensions on these other drops? $62 pretty much right in line. And then our last one is this fall right here. Isn't it crazy how this corresponds and meets almost identical? If we do get a stock price up here and we set some type of double top watch out I'm saying it right now watch out. So I'm going to get rid of these three fib tools. Actually let's just clear the chart. I feel I got some good information across right there. So you can see right here I mentioned this five wave structure. Now we get another five wave structure right here. I'm going to show it. One, two, three, four, five wave structure. That was our other drop that we took. Here's our other drop right here. Let's go look at this briefly. We get a one, two. Now look at how we try to hold support right here. We attempt to. There is attempt but ultimately when that support cracks one, two tries to hold support three, four. Look at how on this wave four we back test the bottom of wave one and then we get a wave five. Now this just so happens. Now it would be impossible to have a trend line set up right here at this time period. But this is where we put our overall trend line. Boom, boom. There's our third point of contact. It would have been impossible to understand that. Now this is where people like the value of the company right here and valuation kept it up. This is how we got this trend line formed. Now I'm going to take this off briefly. We're going to talk about this trend line right here. So right here now people would have had this trend line put in right here. See how we act as support multiple times throughout this? It's going to tie in. You're going to understand what I'm talking about right here. So I see a left leg. We build our neckline. We get a higher or low. We get our extended right leg. If you can't see what I'm looking at right there, I'm going to draw it in for you. We get our extended right leg. Now what am I going to look for? I'm going to look for a back test of the neckline. Look at what this wick does. Let's draw this trade out. Boom, you got wicked into your trade. Where's your stop loss at? You got a stop loss right about there. Now what is our two to one and three to one risk reward? There's a two to one. All right, there's a one to one. Sorry. There's roughly our two to one. Here is a simple trade setup that you would have got triggered in on. Back test of the neckline. Here's my one to one, two to one. Now let's draw out our three to one. Now let's say you were holding out for a three to one. How am I going to know when to cut out of that trade? Right at our two to one risk. This is when we get triggered in at our two to one. Look at this double top that's set. Now let's say you still believed in this trade and you were looking to get that three to one risk reward. Right when we crack this trend line that we have set where we hold support all the ways through, you could have cut out of this trade at a positive trade still and saved yourself. Let's look at this percent fall. Let's say, okay, we cracked this trend line, give it a couple days. Okay, we're out of the trade. Let's say you got out of the trade right here. You saved yourself 44% still. You had a positive trade on this. Nobody is going to knock you for selling this when we crack this trend line. So either as our example back test of the neckline trade that you could have drawn out. Now I can also see with this trend line, if I pull it all the ways through, when we crack this trend line, it is the year 2017. It is three years before we come in contact with this and we do get price action off this. Look at this multiple wicks we put into this and then we have a sell off and we get price action off it even more. That's crazy. Now we do get some trading days above this and we do have let's clear out and remember that we have gaps that need to get filled in right here and our long-term trend line is right here. So is it possible that we get a full extension on the stock? It is possible, but ultimately I'm not interested in the stock at that price. I'm more interested right there to right there to right there. This is where I'm interested in the stock at and I'm not going to go too much more into depth right here with this video is at 10 minutes. I feel there's some good charting information right there. If you're in this stock for a full extension, right now here we have a short-term trend line that we have built out. You know, we're cracked below that and we're backtesting the bottom of it right now. Not a very good sign and we have some pretty alarming gaps on the chart. So I would just say be careful. Be careful holding on to this because I mean if this were to turn into a five-wave structure one, two, three, four, five down to these gap fills from the current price that we're at right now looking at a potential 50% drop down to this trend line. So I would just say be careful in terms of a charting aspect on this. But that is going to complete the video. I hope you guys enjoy the content and as always I'll see you on the next one.