So, now we talk about the main subject which we are seeking in this course that is the genome informatics, but first we know that genome sequencing is there. So, that provides us the sequences of the whole genomes of the organism. So, then the major application in bioinformatics is to find analyze those full genomes and to find those genes which are predicted to have some particular functions. Let us see what genomics is. So, NHGRI defines genomics as the study of a person's, all of a person's genes, the genome including interactions of these genes with one another and with the person's environment. So, it is the study of genes and their interaction with the environment. So, genome informatics then can be defined as the field in which computational and statistical techniques are applied to derive biological information from those genome sequences. LoC4 defines genome informatics as it includes methods to analyze DNA sequence information and to predict the protein sequences and structures from it. So, when we do genome sequence analysis, after we have those genome sequences, what we are going to do with that is we can do the discovery and utilization of the sequence polymorphisms. So, different sequences, they vary from one another. So, we can identify those polymorphisms and we can help identify different traits of those organisms by using those polymorphisms. It gives us an opportunity to explore genetic variability between and within the organisms. In genome analysis, we perform these tasks mainly, we do sequencing at first, then we do assembly. Since the sequencing is done in a way in which the whole genome is broken down into the short fragments and once those fragments are sequenced, we need to put them together. So, that step is called as assembly. Once we assemble that genome, we try to find out the regions in which we have large number of repeats because assemblies, they mess up where we have those repeats. So, we need to find those regions. So, it is an important task to go and look into those assemblies while keeping in mind those regions in which we have those repeats. So, we will go over repeats in a section down below. After we have assembled a finished genome, now we can go for prediction of the genes. So, we can find the genes by using different patterns or features of those genes. We can also look into the ESTs and CDNAs, the parts from where the genes are expressed and then they are then transcribed into messenger RNA. So, those regions we can find them. So, once we if we want to find them within the DNA, obviously, they are then reverse transcribed into CDNA and then we can look into where those CDNAs are present in the genes. So, that will give us the idea of the gene expression or the region from which the genes are making up those messenger RNAs. We can do genome annotations similar way in which we can find out different functions performed by different genes. We can do expression analysis. So, once we have the idea about the regions of the genes in which we can have the gene expression, then we can explore the quantification or we can explore that how much those genes are expressed. So, that thing is under expression analysis. Once those genes they are expressed, then their products they interact with each other and then they perform different metabolic roles in the shape of different metabolic pathways and networks. So, we also do that in the genome analysis. Functional genomics is where we are actually looking into the different functions performed by different regions of the genome actually under the control of different genes and what is the effect of changes in those genes specifically if we want to study about the genes related to diseases. We can also find about the gene location and map the location of those genes on the chromosomes. So, that is called as gene mapping and we can also do comparative genomics in which we can take one genome and we can compare with some other genome and we can find the comparative features what is present in first, what is not present in second and what we have intersections blah blah blah or we can identify the clusters of functionally related genes. Those genes which are maybe they might be having similar structures, they might be having similar sequences and they are performing similar functions. So, what those genes are so that can give us the idea about the evolution. So, obviously, we can do evolutionary modeling. Sometimes we are interested in finding the genes which are kind of duplicated within the same organism. So, in order to do that this self comparison of the proteome. So, proteome is actually the collection of the proteins which are derived from those genomes. So, the whole collection of one organism's proteins can be called as proteome. So, we can compare it with itself here and then we can find about those sequences which are which are duplicated in it. Most of the time while we are doing those genome sequencing projects our objective is obviously the health of us. Obviously, we are looking for some correction of some diseases, we are improving some crop varieties for having more food, we are maybe looking into different drugs against different organisms. So, it is good idea to have those model organisms that can help us study these processes in labs. So, there is a range of model organisms that have been selected so far. E. coli is bacteria, then we have yeast, C. elegans is another example we have a fly here, in this set we have a zebrafish, mouse, homo sapiens of course you and me and then from the plants Arabidopsis is considered as a good model. So, here in this diagram we see universal tree of life that has been made with the help of the structures of small ribosomal RNA unit. It divides whole living organisms into three groups, we have bacteria at the top, we have archaea, these are special organisms which live under harsh conditions and then we have eukarya which is obviously the biggest among all. So, we pick those model organisms from important branches of this tree of life. So, for example, E. coli is right here, we pick yeast as an example of fungi, from animals we have worms, flies, fish and mice. Obviously, Arabidopsis, rice and soybeans are the examples from plants. So, we try to get these organisms best representatives from different classes, from important branches on this tree of life. So, in the end we conclude that sequencing of genome paths the way for future discoveries and model organisms are the best source with which we can study or these genomes and then we can interpolate those results towards the higher organisms.


The chairman of the Independent National Electric Commission, INAAC, applauded the interagency cooperation between his commission for service chiefs, police and other security agencies for the synergy that has ensured the peaceful conduct of the just concluded general elections. Professor Mahmood said these during the meeting of the Interagency Consultative Committee on Election Security on the review of the 2023 general elections in Abuja on Friday. This is though elections in a multi-stakeholder's activity INAAC drives the process as the security agencies secure the environment for the conduct of a peaceful election. We have had a very peaceful election, probably the best ever in our history, and it is according to you and the personalities who are in charge, credible Nigerians that you have done a good job and we are sure it is recorded and we are going to go into this one. The same thing with the team that supported that. We believe in what we are doing, what is going to help secure discussion, stabilize it, make things work and make democracy a family because forever and ever. As you are aware, election is a multi-stakeholder activity. Although INAAC drives the process, a secure environment for the conduct of a peaceful election in the responsibility of the security agencies working to partnership with the coalition. The synergy and the good has overcome many of the challenges prior to the 2023 general election including the targeted attacks on INAAC offices nationwide. Indeed, the concern that the perennial insecurity in some parts of the country before this election may make our deployment of personnel and materials and, consequently, the conduct of polls impossible did not materialize. In which to bless our record, our appreciation to the security agencies and other members of INAACs for the largely peaceful conduct of the polls. At the same time, we should draw lessons from the challenges that occur for improved performance, not only in the next general election, but also in the five elections and also in the pre-governorship elections, as well as other electoral activities to be held over the next three years. Hello. Hope you enjoyed the news. Please do subscribe to our YouTube channel and don't forget to hit the notification button so you get notified about fresh news updates.


People tend to believe some pretty weird things from NASA faking the moon landing to pharmaceutical companies conspiring with government departments to keep people sick and climate change, obviously. I mean, why does that happen? Why do people believe strange things like that? Well, again, what happens is that people tend to focus selectively on what they consider to be the evidence. So they may focus on one data point in the case of climate change, one thermometer somewhere that has been showing cooling for the last 10 years, let's say. That's certainly true, but it is only one of about a billion different measurements that tell us that the climate is changing. And yet by focusing on just this one convenient piece of evidence that is protecting people's worldview, they can be absolutely convinced that they're right.  And it is extremely difficult to get people to go beyond that one piece of evidence because doing so would imply that they have to perhaps change their opinion, and that's a very difficult thing for people to do. One of the major drivers, I think, in the maintenance of people's beliefs and the formation of their beliefs is the role of the media. Now, the media clearly plays a large role. You've encountered that yourself? Absolutely. Yes. Could you tell us a bit about that? Well, that's a very mixed bag and not always a nice story because there's an abundance of evidence to suggest that certain segments of the media have done a very poor job informing the public about a number of different issues from the mythical weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to climate change. So the media are culpable to some extent in providing an informational landscape that isn't always reliable to put it mildly. And that is a serious problem, especially now that we have the ability for people to choose their own media in a sense by focusing on certain sources on the internet. Information has become far more fragmented. People have become more immersed in their own sort of bubble of information they like, and that is what they're consuming to the exclusion of everything else. And there's a lot of research done on that, that people have become more encapsulated, more polarized in general for that reason because people follow their own instincts and they want to hear things that they like. And so they're drifting further apart depending on their initial preferences. That's a serious problem. So climate change deniers probably don't read left, Green Left Weekly or the scientific literature. You don't have to reheat Green Left Weekly. A few people do, but they wouldn't read the scientific literature and the scientific literature isn't being reported accurately by certain media organs. Unfortunately, we do have a lot of evidence about that, that there is just a complete disjoint between the scientific literature and the media coverage. And yeah, and that is a serious problem, it's a serious political problem. So people seem to have a, I think we've called it an anti-establishment bias in that sense that the government, the scientists, people are trying to conspire or are trying to further their own interests at the expense of the general public. You've encountered that before, I assume? Well, that's a common element of conspiracy theories is that it's the official version is always wrong, whether the official version is something that a government is putting out or a scientific body, or in the case of vaccinations, the pharmaceutical industry. Conspiracy theories always involve a rejection of an official account. And they always presume nefarious intent behind the official position. The government or the pharmaceutical industry or scientists, they're out to screw you, basically. That is always the case. And so it's just one way for people to reject a fact is by making up a conspiracy surrounding it, because that's one way out. If you cannot believe or do not want to believe that tobacco is bad for you because you're a chain smoker, well then what are you going to do? How are you going to justify that? Well, one answer is to say that all the medical scientists are conspiring because they want to deny you this fund, so they're making up all this stuff. So that is the purpose of conspiracy theories. That is why people believe in conspiracies. And getting back to your previous point, citing their grandfather who smoked it every day of his life. Exactly. Exactly. They're cherry picking one piece of supporting evidence while they're ignoring absolutely everything else. That's also a characteristic of conspiratorial thinking. My name is Stephen. I think about misinformation.


Ladies and gentlemen, the President of the United States, and Mr. Brighton. Prime Minister Thatcher, on behalf of the American people, Nancy and I extend to you and your family a warm welcome to the United States. Your visit here renews the personal friendship we began in your country just before you took office. Today, as we meet in Washington at the start of my administration, we also renew the friendship and alliance of our people. Great Britain and the United States are kindred nations of like-minded people and must face their test together. We are bound by common language and linked in history. We share laws and literature, blood, and moral fiber. The responsibility for freedom is ours to share. When we talked in London just over two years ago, when neither of us was in office, I was impressed by the similar challenges our countries faced by your determination to meet those challenges. You have said that we enter into a decade fraught with danger, and so we have. But the decade will be less dangerous if the West maintains the strength required for peace. And in achieving that goal, there is one element that goes without question. Britain and America will stand side by side. Outside Cambridge, curving rows of simple white markers testify to a time when peace was lost, and Britons and Americans united to turn back threats to freedom. Our challenge today is to ensure that belligerence is not attempted again by the false perceptions of weakness. So long as our adversaries continue to arm themselves at a pace far beyond the needs of defense, so the free world must do whatever is necessary to safeguard its own security. A stronger, more vigilant NATO must be the background of that security and of our effort for equitable arms control. The Atlantic Alliance will continue to be the steadfast center of our mutual security. But we're also both concerned with the totality of the East-West relationship. The Soviet invasion in Afghanistan was a brutal invasion. You, Prime Minister, took a lead in rallying world opinion against it, and for that, we commend you. The tension in Poland commands the attention of the world. Clearly, the Polish people must be allowed to work out their own solutions to their problems. Outside intervention there would affect profoundly and in the long term, the entire range of East-West ties. There are problems in other parts of the world, such as regions of Africa and Central America, where Anglo-American cooperation is key to the success of Western efforts to find solutions. Americans are grateful for British efforts to bring the American prisoners home from Iran. We remember and are grateful for the support you gave us when you visited here a little more than a year ago. We remember your words of encouragement. They gave us heart. Together, we will work to continue to confront the scourge of international terrorism. Finally, our two nations know that there is no true security unless there is economic stability. We have both suffered from substantial economic difficulties. They might be different in their complexities and require appropriately different solutions, but we know that we share one basic commitment. We believe that our solutions lie within the people and not the state. We are committed to unleashing the natural power of the individual to produce more and to make a better life for all. We believe that people will stay free when enterprise remains free. And we believe that there are no insurmountable problems when we let individuals make decisions outside the restricting confines of government. Prime Minister Thatcher, I look forward to our discussions, to the pleasure of renewing our friendship and the opportunity to fortify the commitment between our countries. On behalf of all Americans, I welcome you and your family to the United States. Mr. President, I counted a double joy that I'm once again in the United States and that I'm being greeted here by you, Mr. President, newly in office after a splendid victory, but long since, for me, a trusted friend. Your warm welcome and this deeply moving ceremony will strike a chord in the hearts of British people everywhere. Mr. President, these are not easy times in which to assume and to bear the responsibilities of national and international leadership. The problems are many. The danger's real. The decision's difficult. Indeed, weaker spirits might even be tempted to give way to gloom, but others, like you, Mr. President, are stirred by the challenge. And that's why I value so greatly the opportunity to come to Washington, to talk with you and to discuss the way ahead on so many of the problems of which you've spoken this morning. We start from a common basis of understanding. For generations, our two countries have cherished the same ideals. We've defended the same causes. We've valued the same friendships, and together, we've faced the same dangers. Today, once again, our sense of common purpose and common resolution is being tested. It will not be found wanting. The message I've brought across the Atlantic is that we in Britain stand with you. America's successes will be our successes. Your problems will be our problems, and when you look for friends, we will be there. Mr. President, the natural bond of interest between our two countries is strengthened by the common approach which you and I have to our national problems. You have mentioned some of the relevant things. We're both trying to set free the energies of our people. We're both determined to sweep away the restrictions that hold back enterprise. We both place our faith, not so much in economic theory, but in the resourcefulness and the decency of ordinary people. Mr. President, you've spoken of a time for renewal. If we are to succeed in the battle of ideas, if we're to hold fast and extend the frontiers of freedom, we must first proclaim the truth that makes men free.  You, Mr. President, have understood the challenge. You've understood the need for leadership. In Britain, you will find a ready response, an ally, valiant, staunch, and true. I just have a few both of us, but I also want to say that due to the range of the meetings with the Prime Minister yet to go to, there'll be no time for any questions. It's both appropriate and timely, I think the Prime Minister Thatcher should be the first West European leader to visit here in the new administration. Our deep ties and perceptions we share give us much to talk about. Together, we're confronting an extremely grave international situation we do so with determination and optimism. We're both committed to safeguarding fundamental Western interests worldwide, including Europe, the Persian Gulf, Southwest Asia, and Central America. Our partnership in NATO is a vital part of that effort. We're determined to consult closely with each other and with the rest of our allies on all matters involving our common security. And in that connection, we affirmed our support for the alliance's decision of December 1979 to modernize long range theater nuclear forces and to pursue arms control efforts at the same time in parallel. We've also noted the Soviet proposal for a summit meeting. We believe this proposal needs to be carefully studied and we will be consulting closely on this matter. For our part, we certainly have an interest in pursuing serious, constructive dialogue with the Soviets on those issues which divide us. And again, let me say, Madam Prime Minister, we're just delighted to have you here with us. Mr. President, friends, may I just add one or two things to what the President has said? We're very sensible in Britain of the honor you do as Mr. President by asking us to make the first official visit of head of government to see you here. And we have indeed taken advantage of the opportunity afforded us to discuss many things which will be extremely important in the coming months. The President and I had a chat for some time and then were joined by the Vice President and the foreign secretaries when we discussed many of the wider issues the world over. Of course, we take the same view in the United States and Britain that our first duty to freedom is to defend our own and our second duty is to try somehow to enlarge the frontiers of freedom so that other nations might have the right to choose it. It is indeed a very difficult time the world over and we have, of course, discussed the many problems as the President said, including President Brezhnev's recent speech, the problems in Africa, the problems in Middle East and the problems in Central and Southern America. I really regard it as the beginning of a process of consultation. We shall both of us be going to a number of summit meetings this year. It is absolutely vital that we coordinate our efforts and decide upon a common line to those many problems that will face us. Mr. President, thank you very much for the wonderful welcome you've given us. Thank you for giving us so much time and for talking in so much detail about the things which concern us both, which concern our peoples and which concern the peoples in the world everywhere. And I think if I may, can I just end on a note of optimism? Yes, there are enormous problems. Yes, there have always been enormous problems but I believe together we have the capacity to solve some of them and those which we do not solve, I believe we can improve so we can set them on their way to a solution in the end. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you.


So what have you learned about that? This seed's kind of planning in my mind of like, what do I want to do when I'm 22, when I finish?  And there was something in me when he talked about selfless sacrifice, that kind of just penetrated deep right there. And I just felt to myself at that age, I was just like, that motivates me more right now.  So you didn't do it right away? You said you went through school. I did everything.


So can you game successfully on the Pixel 3a or 3a XL with its Snapdragon 670 processor? Well, let's find out. So the brand new Pixel 3a is out, the 3a XL also is available, and we have the 3a XL in-house here. It's got a much larger display, a bigger battery, yada yada yada, but it's powered by a Snapdragon 670 processor, not known for its extensive gaming powers. Now, some of you will say, hey, Thunder E, this is not a gaming phone. It doesn't matter, because some of you will still try and do that anyway. Now, the Pixel 3a retails for $479. You can pick it up at Best Buy, it'll give you $100 gift card, so it comes up to actually $300 or something. So it's a cost-effective device, but it's got four gigs of RAM. Yes, it's powered by the Snapdragon 670. You've got a full HD display. How do games handle? That's the big question. Now, of course, usually we play our three standard games, PUBG, some Fortnite, and a little bit of Asphalt 9, so let's take a look. All right, so we have done some gaming on this device, and the evidence is quite clear. This is a budget to major-range device in terms of performance. The Snapdragon 670 is good for your day-to-day phone activities, but when it comes to gaming, it differs quite vastly. It started off with PUBG, where we ran the game at high, and it ran really well. It ran really smooth, going into firefights, no issues there whatsoever. But when we move over to Fortnite, it could not run the game well at low settings. Yes, it was low settings and heavy firefights. We go to about 15 to about 20 frames per second, which is just not acceptable. And also, you can see how choppy it was playing Fortnite. Now, Asphalt 9 ran well, but the graphical quality dropped down tremendously on the game, so I'll say it's about low to medium settings in terms of graphic quality, but it ran well and smooth enough. You can definitely play some games on this PUBG. Yes, that will work Fortnite. Forget about it. You will probably die immensely like I did. But in terms of temperature, this, of course, ran pretty hard at around 96 degrees. So it ran like any other phone itself, so there's no special cooling or anything like that, on the Pixel 3a or 3a XL. Now, the speakers are loud. They're not super loud, but they're also really tinny. So when it gets to the loudest point, it fills us off. But again, it's a low end to budget or mid-range device here. So I think overall, this is a device you can game on, but I'll call it average, aka Daniel calls it average anyway. So if you have any questions or any comments about the Pixel 3a or 3 XL in terms of gaming, let us know. Now, if somebody were wondering about battery life and battery drain, I think it was just standard across most devices. I don't know what the battery life is. Again, I have just got the device I would spend most of the time gaming on it, so I can't give you a fair assessment there. But stay tuned for more coverage on the Pixel 3a and 3 XL. Any questions or any comments, leave it down below. Otherwise, don't forget to like, share, subscribe, and always enjoy your entertainment.


to your students, now we will discuss designing appropriate rewards program organizations कंदर यो मुख्त तफ रीवाड प्रोगेम देजाते हैं वो कैसे किए जाते हैं reward basically outcome base होता है, performance base होता है, reward intrinsic होता है, extrinsic होता है intrinsic reward के अगर अगर आप इस्वो गयते है, well done, you are doing good, this is intrinsic reward these are implied recognition program pay for performance, imply की performance को देख तोभे pay किए जाते है, on their rate में जाते है, bonuses देजाते है, salary में जाते है, annual increment में जाते है, this is called pay for performance last stop option program using financial instruments this is our focus on organizations share if public limited company is there, then you know that share is traded in stocks exchange and people are transferred if public limited company is doing good employee work then they are given this option that we will give you some share so that they can achieve the employer phase when you become employer, then definitely your loyalty organization will be more developed when loyalty will be more developed, then you will not think as an employee you will think as an employer this is called stock option programs


Module 130 in production analysis we are going to study the production function and what is the classification of production function. When we say production function it means we are going to utilize our relationship and relationship between two things inputs and output. So those inputs they will be utilized for the production of a certain output they all will come under the domain of the factors of production or the input. These inputs can be a single that can be two, then be three or the multiple combination. So these inputs can be in various forms. These can be in the form of the capital, labor, energy, resources and anything like this. And these are mostly are a long list but generally we have four types of the factors of production that are called land, labor, capital and now the one the fourth that is the most important that is called the management skill or the entrepreneurship. So a mathematical or the technical relationship by which we are going to utilize the various inputs to convert these inputs in the form of the output that relationship will be called the production function. So here now will be one thing that if there are two or the three inputs there are also various possible ways to combine these inputs. There is no one formula we can say that they will be utilized only and only in one combination. It means there is also a possibility that this is there can be the a basket of the inputs that we have to utilize but these inputs they are in one way or the other they are mutually we can say or within inside they are mutually substitutionable. But at the same time there can be certain inputs that they cannot be substituted to each other. So keeping in view the substitution of these inputs we are having various types of the production function. So production function is a technological summary or a technical aspect that tells us how we have to produce a particular level or particular amount or a particular nature of the output and what are the inputs to be used to utilize that output. Because if we see the inputs of agriculture which we have talked about are different but similarly the inputs of wheat and cotton and the production of rice from cotton can be somewhat similar but it can be that they are varying in some way. Similarly if we see the chemical industry, textile industry, pharmaceutical industry which factors mean the managerial scale, the entrepreneur, the energy that will be same but at the same time the nature of the chemicals, the amount of the expertise of the labor, what are the sophistication level of the technology that may vary. So the purpose of the production function is not only to tell about the nature of the output is also to tell about that how much output we have to produce but with various combinations of the inputs and various amounts of the inputs. Now these various combinations of the inputs if we explain in one example in the form of a table then we can say which we have taken in many of the previous examples, we have taken a gene stitching example. So if we look at the same level of output, if we look at it means it is coming to an end but when we scale it sometimes we increase one input and sometimes to another so we go to various combinations. Now according to this table if we look at it, when we have just kept one capital constant and on the right side we are enhancing the labor so in the start production is going to increase but up to a certain point if we look at the increase also when it is happening then at increasing rate means from 15 to 34 if we look at a big jump then here this 19 points jump along one unit is coming but from next 34 to 44 the jump is of 10. So marginal productivity of labor if we look at it then it is explaining the diminishing points and after a certain point if we look at it then it is equal to 0 means change in output due to one unit change in labor if we look at it then it is 0 and after that it is declined. So along this row marginal productivity of labor is further is in the start increasing at increasing rate then stagnate and then decreasing. So diminishing rate of return or diminishing marginal productivities are explained and likewise if we go to two pages in which we say that we have kept capital amount 2 then same behavior we can explain in the same way. And if we look at its various combinations then there are combinations when we look at this when we see that one unit of labor and one unit of capital say we are looking at the optimal level of 15 genes but on the diagonal if we look at two units of labor and two units of capital we have utilized then we went to 46. Now if we look at the figure of 46 then we have a figure of 50 units below this 50 units are produced by two units of labor and three units of capital. But in the same way if we look at it then 50 units we have genes of one unit of labor one unit of capital or five units of labor we are getting. So if we look at it then this 50 units of output or this 50 units of output then our output is same but with this our respective input is one for capital and if we look at it then five of labor and here we look at three of capital and two of labor. So it means that production function tells us various combinations which we can attain the same level of output and at the same time it also tells us that by looking at it we can attain the highest level of output. So in this table if we look at it then our lowest level of output is 15 and the highest level of output is 103 but this is not clear still up to us that in both combinations or the other we have various combinations of output from these our optimal level of output or we tell it that what is our within range or efficient. Now for that we have to further work on it but a production function we have various combinations of inputs and along with that various combinations of inputs with their substitutability we provide all information about them. Thank you.


So guys, I got a confession to make, you know, a few weeks ago, I discovered a magic white new thing that really blew me away It uh, it promised to do so many things for me that I almost couldn't believe it came through on those promises As soon as I discovered this magic white object I immediately purchased all different kinds that I could I purchased lots of them I bought my friends a lot of magic white stuff. I raved about the magic white stuff They were all blown away about the magic white stuff and I'm setting this up to sound like something else But I'm actually talking about the mr. Clean's magic eraser now I never thought in a million years that I would be I don't know impressed or just kind of blown away by A cheap household sponge. I heard about it on a glass cleaning site Like apparently if your glass is extremely dirty or you just can't clean it People were talking about using the magic eraser, but obviously I don't have too many Like dirty pipes and like I don't even remember like if it worked too well or if it didn't I could To be honest, I couldn't remember so I had it sitting around and I think I was like wiping down my car or something and I just saw it and like, yeah, let me go try it and I Am just absolutely blown away that I got to this age right here And I never knew that this magic eraser existed. I I just I cannot I just literally cannot Believe it because I've used almost every kind of cleaning utensil. I've used all kinds of mops I've used all kinds of brooms. I've used all forms of cleaners and usually cleaners actually help quite a bit Usually like vinegar or hydrogen peroxide sometimes rubbing alcohol But rubbing alcohol can like thane certain things at certain times.  I've used tons of cleaners and I'm just Absolutely blown away by this product if you are somebody who has never tried the mr. Clean's magic eraser what I I suggest for you to do is to just go and get any sort of like washcloth or cleaning utensil And just go ahead and start cleaning your house until you come across something that you just can't wipe off Right get your normal stuff to go clean things eventually you're going to come across something that you can't get off or You know, it's going to take lots and lots and lots of tries or it's not even budging Like you're just scraping scraping and it's like hey, maybe it's like a full-on scratch Or it's some sort of like crazy deep stain or something So I'm serious like literally water and the magic eraser will I would say 90 to 95 chance of getting that off unless it's a scratch unless like maybe it's some rare material or you know stain maybe but but this stuff is absolutely a magic It is absolutely magic.  So um, does it have downsides? The only downside I would say is that if you're not careful with it Um, you can go across a rough surface and you could eat it up really really quick If you're not careful, but having used a lot of them and trying to kind of preserve them now If you're careful about how aggressively you push against extremely rough surfaces That will make it last longer. You can kind of tell when it's starting to get ripped on a surface and try to stop at that point Um, also it it's more of a sponge than I remember or than I thought so You do need to wring it out every now and again and sometimes that are obviously it'll soak up a lot of um Dirt and things and so if you're not soaking it out You'll eventually wipe against the wall and the dirt will just come out and bleed, you know back on the wall Whatever you're wiping off, but I mean, it's going to be amazing for sneakers. It's going to be amazing for your car It's just I'm I'm just absolutely blown away and I'm mad that this isn't like common knowledge Like I probably spent like 120 maybe 140 at least on magic erasers as soon as I found out How good they are like I bought my friend's one I gave one of my co-workers one and apparently both my co-workers were With one magic eraser were able to get off stains That they could not get off before like they were just in their mind They both clean their cars. They both handle their stuff But in their mind, they couldn't get off these stains and one magic eraser is all it took and I actually gave them the thin one So they have like multiple different kinds ones for the bathroom Thicker ones Multi-pack sometimes it has like a variety things like that So I just tried the thin ones out had the thin ones on me gave one to my co-worker And then he gave the other one to my other co-worker and that's how they both tried it And it's a great story is my co-worker is a vegan. So he got egg Coincidentally it had nothing to do with him being a vegan But as you can imagine, um, that would piss you off quite a bit as a vegan and apparently I don't really understand this But apparently the egg's like just staying so I mean his car had been rained on He has just went and just tried to scrub it off as much as he could I had tried it so much. So I knew that the it's legit magic eraser I kept being like it can't be this good, but it is that good, you know, and it's like I'm not into cleaning I'm not into cheap little tools I would never think that I'd ever make a video about this and if I did I would think the sponge is going to be like $20. It's not going to be super cheap, but um Anyways back to the story. He's a vegan. He gets egged.   We had crazy rain this year rain didn't do anything to it. I give him one magic eraser He's very practical. He's very no nonsense.  You know what I mean?   It's just amazing that it's not more common knowledge So anyways guys this video is super long longer than I expected. Mr. Clean magic eraser. It's that good. It's the truth If you have not used it go use it now Like it is so fun because it gets every like it's just unlike anything else.  It's amazing So if have you tried the magic eraser, what are your thoughts on the magic eraser? Do you think it's that good? Do you have something that's better because I almost wonder if there is a better product out there because things always get better So if you know of anything that's better than the magic eraser, let me know anyways guys. Thank you guys so much for watching the video I mean so so much to me. I'm having a great day out here. Hopefully having a great day at home. See you all in the next video