I want to get into the, like, if you're Jerry Jones this morning, what are you pondering? And I'm not going to fire, I'm not going to fire Mike McCarthy before he is fired, or if he's going to be fired, but it is fair game to talk about because he did open the door before the playoffs even started, so I'm him. I'm thinking, you know, about that hourglass, I'm thinking how many shots do I have left? What can I improve? Do I have to rehaul everything? Like, do I have to set a torch to this thing? Are we fumigating the entire organization? And there's a lot of natural pointing to myself included to Bill Belichick as an option. Have I heard that there's connective tissue here? I have. It's definitely something to consider. But then a lot of people point to it and then they point away from it because they say the personalities will clash. It won't work. Bill wants full reign. He won't get it. I would just say to that, not so fast because it's sort of lazy to think that. And if you really look at track record, I would just, I would be asymmetrical in my thinking about this. I would say Jerry Jones is inspired by strong people, strong presence. Jimmy Johnson, strong personality, Bill Parcells. He brought Bill Parcells in there. So let's not pretend that Bill Belichick wanting control or he's too big of a hard ass, sorry, is necessarily a deal breaker for Jerry. Maybe Jerry needs that. Maybe he's attracted, compelled by that. So if I'm trying to put myself in his head and I don't operate in the world of billionaires and their decision making, so it's not that easy. But is there a question from Jerry's perspective along the lines of do I want to take someone who was discarded by one of my biggest compatriots, pun intended, and competitive rivals? He and Mr. Kraft, their friends, they also get after each other. They're also, they're at the top. They're like one in one A. I don't know who's one in one A, but as far as power, as far as influence in the league, if you're Jerry, like, is that a thought that you even have? Like I don't know how billionaires operate. Do you say like I want to marry someone's ex-wife after they had a beautiful marriage? Or do I say I'll take him and I'll win with him? Do I not care? What's the ego of that part of it in making it work for the next couple of years for this organization? The Dan Quinn part of it, I think it matters. I think if he gets rid of McCarthy, let's say he likes Dan Quinn a lot, which I think he does. Can he make him as head coach after yesterday's performance? It was so uninspired. It was so discouraging. Like any shake-up you make there, you got to get rid of Dan Quinn.  He's getting that love. And if I don't make him a head coach here, he's not likely to stay and work under another regime. So I have to be okay with losing Dan Quinn, who has been important and a game changer and a tone setter for this team. Also just consistency and familiarity, which we saw really plays into what the Patriots did. And I would also say this from Jerry's perspective to consider as well. I think if you look at track record, he does appreciate a strong presence. I don't think, I think that Bill Belichick would work better with him in other places in the national football league. But it's also important to note all three of his Super Bowl rings as an owner. Jerry Jones were delivered to him by head coaches that came from where? The college ranks Jimmy Johnson, Barry Switzer. Now he hasn't gone back to that well since he got rid of Switzer. And that was like 25 years ago. But you'd have to think, does that play into the appeal of this dude? Does it play into the like, if you're an owner, do you want that familiarity? Do you change your stripes? Is that a pattern? Does that matter to you? And that would certainly make Jim Harbaugh sort of a sexy option here. If you want intensity, if you want as what Taylor Luan was saying, somebody to completely come back and revamp, switch things, put things on their butt, develop a sense of urgency, a bit of a wild card for sure. But like a willingness to do whatever it takes, it's hard to find a better option. And I guess that depends on what Jim wants. If you want to plug and play, come in there and take on Justin Harbaugh, if you want to have to come and say, yeah, maybe we have to draft J.J. McCarthy. Yeah, we have to get rid of Dak and make a play here. So it's really fascinating.


Welcome to Toffey TV, it is the Everton News Daily. Everton have been dealt another injury blow with the news that Abdelai D'Corey has suffered a stress fracture in his foot during Sunday's home defeat by West Ham United at the Gullison Park. It's another big blow for the Blues, he's obviously already suffered with injuries eight games in. So far they've been missing Jordan Pickford, James Coleman, Yeri Mina, now D'Corey, Rhett Charleson, Dominic Calvert-Lewman from this start and 11 not to mention players like Anzai Gomez, Fabian Delph, Gabamon at times has been injured as well as Wobby. It's just being a catalogue of injuries already this season but D'Corey is a huge want this. I don't think there's another player in our squad, there isn't another player in our squad, you can do what D'Corey does for this evidence side. He's been in fantastic form this season, he's faced in a lot of the metrics that Sky have been showing today actually on top of the injury news show. Everton will miss him. The only kind of positive thing to come out of it was when it was first reported, they were talking 10 to 12 weeks. That apparently now is around about 6 to 7 weeks maybe. He doesn't need an operation which is big news and good news. He suffered a stress fracture in his foot in back in March and was supposed to be out for 12 weeks and he came back after that. So, hopefully he's a quick healer and there is an international break coming up as well so hopefully we can get him back sooner rather than later but it is a massive blow for Rafa Benitez definitely. One player that has returned is Tyler on Yango. He played his first game in six months last night for Everton under 23s as they beat Leeds United 4-2 at Southport. On Yango being out for six months with an ankle injury sustained in last season's FA Youth Cup at Manchester City. The midfield player played 80 minutes last night so it's fantastic to have him back. He was delighted with how it went and if he can get himself up to speed then maybe he can be someone who Rafa Benitez looks at to try and plug to the corey gap. Who knows, but it's great to see him back on the pitch. Everton came from two goals down last night to beat Leeds 4-2 goals from Eli Campbell, Lewis Dobbin, Charlie Whittaker and Reese Hughes, give David Underworth a big victory after like you say being 2-0 down. Everton today have been linked with a move for club bruise player Charles D'Catela. He's playing tonight actually against Manchester City in the Champions League. The 20-year-old plays in midfield or can play also up front as well. He's six for four inches. He has scored nine goals in 61 appearances for bruise. Very, very highly rated Everton keeping tabs on him so who knows whether anything will come of that one. And the Premier League have today confirmed that referee Graham Scott will be in charge of Everton's game against Wafford at Gouldersen Park on Saturday. Let's hope he's much better than Stuart Atwell.


Innovation and digital services provide a way forward in transforming a system for better production, better nutrition, a better environment, and a better life. Leaving no one behind. Let's work together on innovation and digital and cultural. Come join us at FLC's Solution Forum.


My name is Sam Vaknin and I'm the author of Malignant Self-Love, Narcissism Revisited. If all else fails, the abuser recruits friends, colleagues, mates, family members, the authorities, institutions, neighbors, the media, teachers, in other words, third parties, to do his bidding. The abuser uses them to control, coerce, threaten, stalk, offer, retreat, tempt, seduce, harass, communicate, or otherwise manipulate his target. The abuser controls these unaware instruments exactly as he plans to control his ultimate prey. In both cases he employs the same mechanisms and the same devices. And he dumps his profs unceremoniously when the job is done. One form of control by proxy is to engineer situations in which abuse is inflicted on third another person. Such carefully crafted scenarios of embarrassment and humiliation are meant to provoke social sanctions, condemnation, or program, or even physical punishment against the victim. Society, or social group in this case, become the instruments of the abuser against the victim. Abusers often use other people to do their dirty work for them. These sometimes unwitting accomplices belong to three groups. The first group is the abuser's social milieu. Some offenders, mainly in patriarchal and misogyny societies, co-opt family members, friends, and colleagues into aiding and abetting their abusive conduct. In extreme cases, the victim is held hostage, isolated and with little or no access to funds or transportation. Often the couple's children are used as bargaining chips or leverage in such a dispute. Unbeent abuse by the abuser's clan, kin, Keith, or village or neighborhood is rampant. The second group of unwitting or unwitting accomplices is the victim's social milieu. Even the victim's relatives, his family members, his friends, his colleagues, they are all amenable to the considerable charm, persuasiveness and manipulativeness of the abuser and to his impressive, thespian acting skills. The abuser offers a plausible rendition of the events and interprets these events to his favor. Others rarely have a chance to witness an abusive exchange firsthand in its close quarters so as to discern between abuser and victim. In contrast, the victims are often on the verge of a nervous breakdown. They are harassed, unkempt, irresistible, impatient, abrasive and hysterical. Confronted with this contrast between a polished, self-controlled and suave abuser and his harried casualties, it is easy to reach the wrong conclusion that the real victim is the abuser. Or another conclusion that both parties are abusing each other similarly and equally. The praise acts of self-defense, assertiveness, or insistence on her rights are interpreted as aggression, liability, or a mental health problem. Thus we come to the third group of accomplices and collaborators, aiders and abetters, the system. The abuser perverts the system. Therapists, marriage counselors, mediators, court-appointed guardians, police officers, judges they all end up upholding the abuser's version and helping him in feather abusing his victims. Abuser uses them to pathologize the victim and to separate her from her sources of emotional sustenance, notably from her children and then from her family and then from her friends and colleagues. Forms of abuse by proxy include socially isolating and excluding the victim by discrediting her through a campaign of malicious rumors, a smear campaign, harassing the victim by using others to stalk her or by charging her with offenses she did not commit, provoking the victim into aggressive or even anti-social conduct by having others threaten her or her loved ones, colluding with others to render the victim dependent on the abuser. But by far the victim's children are the abuser's greatest source of leverage over his abused spouse or mate. There is a video in this channel dedicated to how the abuser leverages the children in his dispute with his victims. Be sure to watch it.


In this video, I'm going to talk about the distance formula. I'm going to do just one example, and I have to do the distance formula a couple of times on this example. I'm just going to do one example of the distance formula, how to use it, and one thing that I can actually be used for. All right, so as you can see, one of the things that we have here is we have a Cartesian coordinate system. We have an XY coordinate system. We have a couple of segments on here, JK and FG. What we're going to do is we're going to find FG and JK. Now notice there's no lines or anything out here. Find the length FG and find the length JK, that's what those two mean. Find those two lengths, and then determine whether the segments FG is congruent to the segment JK. So what we want to do is we want to find these two segments, how long are they, and are they congruent? Okay, so a couple of different questions here. All right, so first thing that we need to do is we need to know what the distance formula is. So I'm going to write down the distance formula up here. Distance, usually determined by little d, is equal to big square root sign. What you want to do is you want to take your x1 minus x2 in parentheses, square it, plus y1 plus y2 in parentheses, square it. Okay, now what these y1s and y2s mean is it simply means our first x coordinates and first x, second x, or first y, second y. Because what we're doing is we're finding the distance between two points. So we have to have a first point and a second point, and that's a distance formula. Oh, I made a little bit of a mistake here. Let's go back real quick. It is not plus, it is subtract for both of them, my mistake. Sorry about that. All right, so take the x's, subtract them, square them, take the y's, subtract them, square them, and add those two results together, and then take the square root of that. Okay, so find fg, find the length of fg, and find the length jk, okay, then determine whether they can grow. We'll worry about that later. Okay, now one thing I'm going to do here is that on this grid, I don't have the coordinates here. So I'm actually going to write out those coordinates real quick. So this j here is a negative 4, 0, that's what the coordinates for that one is. This k down here is a negative 1, negative 3, negative 1, negative 3, this f over here is 1, 2, 1, 2, and then this g over here is 5, 5, 5, this g is a 5, 5. All right, so what we're going to do is we're going to find the distance of these two segments. Let's just start with fg, okay, let's start with fg, since that's the one we want to start with. Okay, so I'm going to use my distance formula. So what I'm going to do, now when you're using distance formula, I know it's intimidating because it's a very large formula, but one thing you can do to make this go a little bit faster is kind of write everything out to begin with, but don't write these x's and don't write the y's, okay? Write everything else, the symbol, the parentheses, the squares, write all that stuff out first, but then don't write the x's and the y's, this actually makes things go a little bit faster. So here's my parentheses, my parentheses, okay, and then I'm going to subtract these numbers, okay? Write that out first. Now all I have to do is plug in some of the numbers. So f is going to be my first point, g is going to be my second point. So as I come over here, I'm going to look at my first point and second point, okay? So what I'm going to do is I'm going to take the x's and subtract them. So I've got to go over here and find the x's. So here's an x of one, plug it in, all right? Here over here for my second point is an x of five, plug it in, okay? No sign changes or anything like that, so it's just one minus five. Pretty simple. All right, so now for the second one over here, this is for the y's. So now I've got to go over to my points. I have a two for my first y and I have a five for my second y. Okay, again no sign changes or anything like that, that's kind of handy. Now again, I think this is an easier way to do this because now, now you just subtract the number, square them, and you've got everything already set up. I think it's a lot easier to put in the numbers this way. But anyway, you might have a different way that's easier for you. I would go with whatever's easier for you. This is easy for me, so this is what I do. All right, one minus five is negative four, quantity squared, plus negative three, quantity squared. I use quantity to kind of close up parentheses. Anyway, negative four squared is sixteen, negative three squared is nine. So when you add those together, you get, let's go off to the right here. The square root of twenty-five, which is five. So when you know fg is equal to five, I'm going to write that over here, fg is equal to five. Okay, that's one thing that we do know. Great. Okay, so that's using the distance formula. What I suggest to do is write out the square root symbol, write out the parentheses and everything first, and then fill in your numbers after that. So I'm going to do that for the second one. I'm going to go a little bit faster through the second one since you just saw me do the first one. So now this one, what is the second one? jk. So I got to do the second one of jk. Let me actually, let me move that down just a little bit. That's what's nice about working on a computer is that you can move your text that you draw down a little bit, which is nice. Okay, so jk, I'm going to write my big square root symbol, put my parentheses squared plus a parentheses squared. All right, now I'm just going to put in my x's here and my y's here. So let's go over to my point. I have an x of negative four and an x of negative one. Negative four minus a negative one that actually turns into plus one. Negative four minus a negative one that turns into negative four plus one. So there is a sign change for that one. Make sure you keep track of those sign changes. That can be very tricky. There were no sign changes for this first one, this one, there's probably going to be sign changes. Now notice where our points are. These points were both positive, so we didn't have any sign changes. These points here, some of those numbers are negative, so there's probably going to be some sign changes. Just be aware of that. All right, so now I've got to put in the y's, so I have a y of zero, pretty easy, zero minus a negative three. So there's a sign change, zero minus negative three becomes a positive three, a little sign change there. Okay, now what I need to do is add these together, so this gets negative three, bad three, negative three squared plus three squared, squared symbol over that, and that's nine plus nine, which gives me the square root of eighteen. Now one of the things I'm not going to do is I'm not going to actually plug that into a calculator. I don't need to. Look at this right here, jk is equal to the square root of eighteen. These do not match up. Why am I noting that they don't match up? Look at the second part of our question. Determine whether f, the segment fg is congruent to the segment jk. These, since they're not the same length, since they're not the same length, okay, they're not going to be congruent. That was basically what we're trying to get in the first part. We'll have a little bit of work, a couple of examples with the distance formula, but we also want to figure out if they're the same length, and they're not going to be the same length, okay? So that's one thing to note as you're going through the problem, make sure you keep track of everything that you're supposed to find. Try to keep track of everything you're supposed to find. One other thing that I want to note here before I'm done with this problem is that this person right here, the square root of eighteen, we can actually simplify that. The square root of eighteen, I can split that up into the square root of nine, and the square root of two, okay, because nine times two gives me back to eighteen. Now the reason I do this is because I actually know what the square root of nine is, that's going to be three. That's going to be three. Square root two, I don't know what that is. I'm just going to leave it as a square root of two. So a lot of times when you see these radicals, when you see these square roots, a lot of times you'll see them simplified like this. Instead of the square root of eighteen, eighteen's kind of a big number, we can simplify it to three root two. And so this is still the square root of eighteen, but it's just been simplified a little bit. But still, this does not match with what we had up here. So another part of my answer is segment fg is not congruent to segment jk, run out of room here on the bottom. That's also part of my answer, okay? And you know this because these numbers don't match up. They're not the same length. All right, all right, hopefully that example helps you with the distance formula. Hopefully it gave you a couple of strategies to use to make the distance formula easier to use. Don't be intimidated by the length of the formula or by all these x's and y's. It's pretty simple once you use it a few times. Again, don't be intimidated by any of these. They're all pretty simple, at least at this level. Anyway, if you have any questions or anything like that, make sure you get those answered by either me or your teacher. This can be a difficult formula to use if you haven't used it very much. So anyway, hopefully those strategies will help you for the distance formula.