What's up, everybody? Welcome into the Front Yard Fantasy Hour presented by FanDuel. I'm your host, Simon, joined as always by my co-host, John Luke, and our guest co-host for today, Joey Wright. What's up, guys? Joey. Doing good. How's it going, Simon? It's going pretty good. No one ever asks me. Yeah. No one ever asks me how you're doing. I want to know how you're doing. No one cares. Guys, also joining us today is a very special guest, good friend of the show. We've got Jeff Hasley on with us today, making his fantasy fortune debut. You've played most of our other games, but this is the first time you'll be playing fortune. For those of you that do not know Jeff, Jeff is a senior writer over at Football Guys. He's a digital designer and video editor for a multitude of sites in the fantasy space and the host of the Carolina Fandom Podcast. Jeff, thank you so much for joining us today, my man. Thank you. Appreciate it. Love the Friday Front Yard Fantasy Fund. So thanks for having me on and hello to everyone since that's the theme. Hello. And guys, some of you joining, we are giving away a Scott Fishbowl spot on the stream today. I just wanted to remind everybody watching that how we're going to give this away. I mentioned it in a tweet. I'm going to say it here. You just got to make us laugh. Whichever comment we think as a group is the funniest throughout the show. Like, like really topical.  That's probably not going to get some witty humor in there that makes us chuckle. And that spot is yours. That's it. It's that simple. Can I leave the show?  You want to go in the chat? I want to try to get the spot. You already have a spot, Joey. We're going to do something else. Mr. Scampers, what's up? Mr. Scampers in the chat says happy second show of this Friday to everyone. Hi, Mr. Scampers. Happy second show back to you. Howdy, Jay, even though we just said howdy to Mr. Scampers. Howdy to you, Jay. And he said, Joey, happy to know my phone's predictive text automatically goes to Scampers when I type Mr. You won, Mr. Scampers, you got it. He's arrived. James, can we get three shows like yesterday? No, unless unless JL is going to do a four hour live stream of him playing overcooked, then I don't think we're going to get a third stream. I would actually watch that. I would actually do that. Miss, then we've got Damien here wants to know, where's Mr. Scampers going? Mr. Scampers is going somewhere. We'll have to find out. Stay tuned to find out where he's going. Albert, what's up? Welcome and glad to have you here. Guys, like I mentioned, we're going to play some fantasy fortune today, but before we get into that, a couple of reminders. Number one, if you are not already following our friend Jeff over on Twitter, go and fix that right now. He's on Twitter at Jeff Hasley. His name, it's right there below his face on the screen. So make sure you guys go over there and follow him.  Sit that subscribe button right below this video. They have a whole team of awesome content creators helping you guys win some money and win your leagues and that draft season is coming up. Best falls go in live. So you guys got to make sure you're getting all of that content. You can find them on YouTube, obviously, then also Twitter, Instagram, Facebook, TikTok. They're on FanDuel at all of those platforms. FanDuel, it's in the game. Everything is in the game. So make sure you guys follow them over there. And then last, but certainly not least, we are live every day, Monday through Friday at 3 p.m. Eastern time, playing games just like this. So if you enjoy coming in here on Friday nights and playing some games with us, check us out on your very late lunch break during the week, Monday through Friday and your work day with us from three to four. We know you're not doing anything but scrolling spreadsheets at that time. Come on. So come on and hang out with us at that time bathroom. Everybody knows that. Guys, are you ready for some fantasy fortune? Oh, yeah. Let's get it going. I'm going to go ahead and pull this puzzle board up. And I'm going to explain how this game is going to work. The game fantasy fortune is a lot like the popular TV show Wheel of Fortune, but with a couple small changes. Number one, instead of spinning a wheel, contestants are going to be answering 50-50 NFL or fantasy related trivia questions in order to guess a continent. If you get your question right and you get to guess a continent, it will be worth $500 for each instance of it that shows up on the board. At any point during your turn, except after I've asked a question, you can solve the puzzle or you can buy a vowel. In order to buy a vowel, I will require a minimum of $500 in your round bank though, because it needs to cover the vowels that are going to show up on the board. If you've got 300, we're not going to allow you to do it. If you get three questions in a row right and the consonants, the corresponding consonants, that will be the end of your turn. But I'll give you five seconds to solve the puzzle and you will bank all of the money that you have earned in that round so far into your total game bank. We'll go like this until enough people have, or until we've run out of puzzles or run out of time at which point the person with the most money in their bank will be our champion. You guys got it? Any questions? Nope, I don't think so. Also, Jay said, I'm digging the black Mets jersey. Jeff up there. Yes.  He is now a Mets fan. Yeah, Jay no longer supports the Yankees. He supports the Mets. That is a true fact. Also, Simon held up a two when he said three. No, the other finger was just off stream. Oh, he was hiding it. Yeah, it was just like that. You couldn't see it. Actually, I held up two fingers on accident, I think. Mr.  Yeah, I am a walk. Thank you so much, Mr. Scambers. Simon, you get the Scottish Bulls. Early clubhouse leader for the ticket. Jay, I'll get that one on an earlier week. Mr. Scambers was a throwback joke right there. OK, guys, I'm going to go ahead and pull up this first puzzle. No toss up today. We're just going to jump straight into our first puzzle. Jeff, you're going to go first, Jay, I'll second. Joey, third, and let's get going. Let's do it. The first puzzle is going to be same college. So these are two NFL players that attended the same college, not necessarily at the same time, maybe, but not necessarily. Just wanted to make sure you guys knew that. Jeff, to start this game off, would you like to solve this puzzle or would you like a question? Oh, boy, I'd like a question. OK, we will start off with a question and we're going to start in the fantasy points category. All questions that I ask about fantasy points this game will be PPR. I'll try to reiterate when I say the question, but if I don't say PPR, you can just assume these are going to be PPR questions. So my question for you, Jeff, is who scored more PPR fantasy points last season? Who scored more PPR fantasy points? Was it Robert Woods or was it Cole Beasley? Wow. Let's see. Woods got hurt what, like week 12, something like that. So I don't know. I'll probably I'm going to say I'll say Cole Beasley. Cole Beasley is correct, Jeff. Which letter would you like? Let's go with a C, a C. There are two C's in this puzzle going to add a thousand dollars to your round bank. So now, Jeff, you have options here. You can buy a vowel, you can solve this puzzle or you can go straight to another question. Let's go to another question. OK, we'll go another question. Who scored more PPR fantasy points last season? Who scored more PPR fantasy points last season? Was it Melvin Gordon or was it Damien Harris? Oh, geez, that's got to be Damien Harris. It was Damien Harris. It was fairly close, so I didn't mean to make it that close. Only 15 PPR points separating them. But you got it anyways, Jeff, which letter would you like? Let's see. How about a S? An S. There is one S in this puzzle. So, Jeff, that's two questions right for you. This will be your last opportunity to buy vowels this term. It could make it back to you. Would you like to buy a vowel? Would you like another question? Or do you want some? I'll buy a vowel. Let me buy a I. An I. There are two I's in this puzzle going to subtract 200 from your total. Now, what would you like to do? Another vowel or another question? Well, I can't do another question, right? Or do I get three? I get three answers. So this will be your third question. That's why it's your last chance to buy a vowel. Let's go with the question, then. OK, a question. My question for you is who scored more PPR fantasy points last season? Who scored more PPR fantasy points? Was it Tyler Boyd or was it Alan Lazard? Tyler Boyd. It was Tyler Boyd. That's absolutely correct. Which letter would you like to get this? You bank this money, Jeff. Let's go with H. H. I am sorry. There are no. On the board, that letter would have banked that money for you. But unfortunately, now we are moving on to J. L. Jail, would you like to solve this puzzle or would you like a question? Question me. Question. Here we go. My question for you is who scored more PPR fantasy points last season? Who scored more PPR fantasy points? Was it Russell Gage or was it Nicole Hardman? Russell Gage. Russell Gage is absolutely correct, Jail. Which letter would you like? I'll go with the K. A K. There are no phase in this puzzle, Jail. Come on. You can try, man. So Joey, would you like a question or would you like to solve? I want a question. A question. You sure? You didn't sound so sure.  I didn't mean to ask you a question. I'm going to give you one second. No, I want a question. I want a question. A question for Joey. My question for you is who had more PPR fantasy points last season? Who had more PPR fantasy points? Was it Tony Pollard or was it Chase Edmonds? Chase Edmonds. I'm sorry, Joey. It was Tony Pollard, which means we're going to move back. What was the points? I just want to learn something today. Do you have it? It was 162.6 for Tony Pollard to 143.34 Chase. It was close. I did a close one for Jeff. So I also finished for Chase, even though he's injured. Might have helped him, but not. Oh my God. I just got one of the names. Yep. Jeff, it's back to you. Would you like to solve? Would you like to buy a vowel? Or would you like a question? Let me buy an E. An E. I am sorry, God. No, it's a puzzle. It means we're going to move on to JL. What would you like to do here? I need a question. Okay. My question for you. We're going to move off fantasy points. Let's move into some rushing yards questions, JL. Who had more rushing yards last season? Who had more rushing yards? Was it Josh Allen? Or was it Devin Singletary? Singletary. Singletary is correct by over 100 yards, JL. Which letter would you like? I will take an N. An N. There are two N's in this puzzle. Going to add a thousand. What would you like to do now, JL? May I buy an O? You may buy an O. And there are three O's. Going to subtract 300. What would you like to do now? I would like to... I would like to take another question, please. Okay. My question for you is who had more rushing yards last season? Who had more rushing yards? Was it Deandre Swift? Or was it Miles Sanders? Miles Sanders. Miles Sanders is correct, JL. Which letter would you like? I will take an L. An L. There are two L's. So I think you guys got that last name figured out. I got the first name figured out, too. What would you like to do now? This is your last opportunity to buy a vowel, right? Because you guessed the A. Buy an A. An A. There is one A in this puzzle and that is it for the vowel. So I either need you to solve or take another question. I will take another question. Okay. Who had more rushing touchdowns last season? Who had more rushing touchdowns? Was it Elijah Mitchell? Or was it Boston Scott? Mitchell. I am sorry. Boston Scott had seven to Elijah Mitchell's five. Which means Joey, we are on to you. I'm going to solve to get on the board. Yeah. Just because I'm going to say Tom Brady and Nico Collins. That is correct. It is Tom Brady and Nico Collins. It's both University of Michigan. We all got points, right? No, just you got points, Joey. Nobody else got points. Jeff and JL got very close to getting points. JL got to that third question. Thanks for rubbing that in, Joey. Jeff got the third question, right? Jeff got the bank's money. So let's see in the chat who got this one. It looks like Albert came in with Tom Brady and then said Nico Collins got it. Albert was the first one who got it at 511. Nice job, Albert. Whatever that happened. Or 611, about five minutes ago pulled that one out. Nice job, Albert, on that one. Tom Brady and Nico Collins absolutely nailed it. And then Chuck said Boston Scott famous touchdown machine. Touchdown machine. How could I forget? How could you forget, JL?  Guys, we are going to move on to our next puzzle now. Puzzle number two. Joey got that one right, which means we are going to start with Jeff. And Jeff, this category is bad fantasy team names.  Oh, boy. Would you have a question or would you like to solve? I will not solve. I will take a question. Okay, we're going to go to receiving yards, Jeff. My question for you is who had more receiving yards last season? Who had more receiving yards? Was it Marquise Brown or was it Dallas Goddard? Marquise Brown. Marquise Brown is correct. Which letter would you like? S. And S, there are two S's in this puzzle. Going to give you $1,000. Jeff, would you like to buy a vowel? Another question or solve this puzzle? I'm going to, if I solve, I lose my turn, right? Yeah, if you solve, that's your turn, if it's wrong. So yeah, no, I will not try to solve, even though I could try to guess, but no, give me, I'll take a question, please. Okay, a question. My question for you is who had more receiving yards last season? Who had more receiving yards? Was it T Higgins or was it DK Metcalf? Higgins. It was Higgins. Which letter would you like? How about a R? An R. There is one R in this puzzle. Going to add another $500. This will be your last opportunity to buy vowels this turn unless it makes it back to you. Would you like to buy a vowel or take another question? No, I'll take another question. I'll try to get the bank. Okay, let's do it. Your last question is who had more receiving touchdowns last season? Who had more receiving touchdowns? Was it CJ Uzama or was it Pat Friarmooth? Friarmooth. Friarmooth had 70 Uzama, five. That is correct. The big touchdown games from Uzama didn't trick you. I thought that might be a little tricky there. Which letter would you like? You get to bank the money if this is up there. All right, let's go with a T. A T. There's one T. Oh, that's not what I thought it was. So that's going to add that up there to $2,000. Jeff, you've got five seconds to try to solve this. Otherwise, we're going to move on to the next contestant. We're going to move on to JL here. Crumbs and attempts. I don't know. You got it. I'm just kidding. Dale, would you like a question? What would you like to solve? I need a question. Okay, my question for you is who had more receiving touchdowns last season? Who had more receiving touchdowns? Was it Mike Williams or was it Rob Gronkowski? I know exactly how many Mike Williams had. I'm going to go Mike Williams. Mike Williams is correct. Nine to Gronk, six. Which letter would you like? I did not know exactly how many Mike Williams had. Oh, come on. That deserves the ticket. I'm going to go with an M as in Nancy. An M as in Nancy. There's one M as in Nancy here, JL. $500 going your way. What would you like to do now? Oh, I am going to take another question. Another question. I need it. Okay, JL. My question for you is who had more receiving yards last season? Who had more receiving yards? Receiving yards, receiving yards. Yeah, that's all I'm asking about. Receiving yards, yeah. Was it LaVisca Chanel Jr. Or was it, oops, sorry, excuse me, right there. Adam Thielen. Receiving yards. Yes. Oh. Oh. LaVisca. I am sorry. No. But Visca did have more than you think. I feel like he had 619 receiving yards in Adam Thielen. Had less than you think he had 10 touchdowns, but only 726 receiving yards. I wanted to answer Adam Thielen and I tried to play you, Simon. He bought the dip. Yeah. I just thought J had a hundred questions. So it was Visca. Yeah, that is a fair, that's a fair assessment as well. Joey, what do you want to do here? Do you want to solve it? Do you want a question? I want a question, please. Okay, I can do that. Joey, my question for you is who had more receptions last season? So we're talking receptions now. Who had more receptions? Was it Leonard Fournette or was it Zach Ertz? Lenny did have a good number. I'm still going to say Ertz, though. And you're still going to be right because you said that. Which letter was I like to? You're still going to be right. I'm going to go with an H. An H. Bonk. Bonk. There's no H in this puzzle, Joey. That's not fun. I've never been bonked before. Never been bonked. That's a lie. I've bonked you plenty. Really? Have you? Okay. Yeah. In canton once or twice. You probably didn't notice. Jeff, we're going to come back to you now. Would you like to solve this puzzle or would you like a question? No, let's go with the question, please, Simon. Okay, my question for you. We're going to stick in the receptions category if you don't mind. Actually, even if you do mind, we're going to stick in the receptions category. Who had more receptions last season? Was it Van Jefferson or was it Tyler Higby? Higby. Higby is absolutely correct. What letter would you like, Jeff? C. C. There are no keys in this puzzle. That was a good bonk, Jail. He's on the bonk tonight. He's just waiting for it. He's just sitting there so ready to bonk everyone. Bonk. Jail, what bonks around? Bonks around. So just watch out. Okay. Bonks around, comes around. I can't wait for another letter. Jail, would you like a question? Would you like to buy a vowel? Could you got money if you want to buy a vowel? Nope. Okay. My question for you, Jail. We're going to switch it up a little bit. Which position out of the two that I'm about to name, did the Carolina Panthers target more? So a higher percentage of the target share. Was it the running back position or the tight end position? Oh gosh. Running back or tight end position? Which one did he target more? The Panthers is a team. Yes, the Panthers are a team. So as a team. Just surper though. Just surper. As a team, what position group got more, a higher percentage of the targets? The running backs or the tight ends? Let's go tight end. I am sorry. The running backs for the Panthers had 24.3% of the target share. The tight ends had 13.9. So they have to be like over 10% there. You did me wrong. They did you dirty right there. We're going to move on to Joey though. Joey, it's your turn. Are you ready for your question? Yeah, I'm ready. You're going to get a similar question here. But I'm switching up the team. Denver Broncos, who got a higher percentage of the target share? Was it the running backs or was it the tight ends? For the Denver Broncos? Out of the chat contestants. I almost forgot to mention that. I feel like Vant and Albert O had a good number. I'm going to say the tight end. I'm going to stick with JL's answer, but the different team. Well, you are correct with sticking with that answer. Oh, so it's right when he says it. It is right when he says it. I see how it is. 27.5% compared to the running backs. I see how this game is being played. That's anti-JL. It's because you bonked too much. Which letter would you like, Joey? Man, these words are throwing me off. I'm going to go with end. I'm really scared though. I'm going to get bonked. Hello. Four ends, Joey. We're going to add 2,000 to your round bank. Would you like to buy a vowel? Would you like a question or would you like to solve? I like to buy a vowel. Vowel and A, please. There is one A in this puzzle, Joey. What would you like to do? I just give me a question. Okay, we'll go to another question. My question for you is who had more receiving yards last season? Who had more receiving yards? That's when they catch the ball and they go with it. Yeah, that's whenever someone catches a ball and then it measures how far they went. Okay, I got that. Yeah, each time they catch it, they just measure how far. If you need further explanation, we can get on after the show. Okay. Who had more receiving yards last season? Was it Emmanuel Sanders or was it Kendrick Bourne? Oh, boy. Two of my favorite wide receivers last year. I'm going to say Kendrick Bourne. Kendrick Bourne is correct, Joey. Which letter would you like? Give me the D. All right, give him the D. There are two Ds in this puzzle, Joey. Now, this will be your last opportunity to buy vowels if you would like to. I know the chats probably got this already. They do. Don't cheat. I would never cheat. I would like a question, please. Okay, this is your last question, Joey. I'm really bad at solving when I'm on the clock with the question. I'm really bad at it. My question for you is who had more PPR fantasy points last season? Who had more PPR fantasy points? I got it. Clyde Edwards-A-Layer. Get this question right and you can get it. Was it Clyde Edwards-A-Layer or was it Kenyon Drake? Man, this is so tricky. More fantasy points, you said, right? Yeah, PPR fantasy points. C-E-H or Kenyon Drake. Kenyon Drake. I'm going to say C-E-H still. C-E-H is correct, Joey.  I'm going to solve a big trick there. Which letter would you like? I need a letter. F. There is one F up there going to have 500. And now, Joey, you've got five seconds to solve before we move on to Jeff. I... Friends and E-10 enemies. You know what? I think it was a mispronunciation thing. You got it. It is friends and E-10 enemies. That's what I said. That was what you were getting at there. Friends and E-10 enemies is the best. What did I say? You said friends and E-10 enemies. I didn't have that. I can't say. So here's the thing. I've watched Finding Nemo 300 times.  However, that word is said. I can't say it. You said it. You said it fast. Did I? Shout out to Dame at 524 three minutes ago. Nice job. Why is that a bad fantasy name? That's a great fantasy name. That's a great name. Okay. Well, I did mention this is subjective on my part. Right? I think it's a bad fantasy team name. You guys are free to disagree. But before we move on from this one, I did want to ask you guys about E-10. So, Jeff, we'll start with you. There's reports that James Robinson is actually like going to be ready earlier than expected, taking part in some of the training camp activities. What does this mean for you? Maybe with James Robinson coming back maybe earlier for E-10 this season. This means that any James Robinson shares that I have, I can go ahead and trade them. There we go. I don't think Robinson is going to be that much of a factor in E-10's ascension into a fantasy relevant type of position or type of situation. So, we got to be careful with those Achilles injuries. I mean, there's just is a very low success rate of doing anything after that for running backs, right? So, he might be able to run and run fast and maybe even cut, but does he have that explosiveness? Does he have that power, that drive? A lot of times we don't see that after that injury. So, yeah, I don't think it's a non-story for me, even though I have a bunch of James Robinson shares and I'd love him to do great. I think that E-10 is the answer there. Joey, do you agree with Jeff there? Do you have more concerns about Robinson? No, I mean, I've been pretty on the record of how excited I am next year for the Jaguars offense, which sounds so strange to say, but it's just all the pieces around on my like. And I think Trevor Lawrence away from Urban Meyer, I'm really excited to see what that looks like. So, yeah. Me too. Jail, anything to add or are you in line with these guys? Are we all in line with these guys? We got four ETN. I never came off that ETN hype train. I started it last summer. I feel like his draft value has stayed at a reasonable level. Like, I don't feel like I have to reach to grab him if I really want him. No, this may change. This news will probably keep it level. Yeah, which is good. Yes, rising towards the season, but this news may keep it relatively level at least across our fingers, hope so. Also, there was Alex in the chat saying, I think Simon is a bad name. It's subjective. It's true. You can blame my parents. You can take it up with them, Alex. Craig said, that's swim lessons for the kids and I cried, but I wanted to pull this up more so happy birthday to Craig again. Happy birthday, Craig. Happy birthday, Craig. Thanks for tuning in on your birthday and hanging with us for a little bit. Guys, let's pull up our next puzzle. You ready? Yeah. Oh, and I need to give Joey his money there. What in the world? What is wrong with you? What are you doing? There's lots of points up for grabs on this one if you guys can solve it. It's all there for the take and this can change the game. Jeff, you are up first. Would you like to solve this puzzle or would you like a question? Yeah, would you like to solve it, Jeff? That would be like game over. That would be my show over. And the pod never played this game again. Right. So, no, I will take a question, please. Okay, I'm going to give you a question similar to the one that I gave to both of these guys. My question is going to be which position group got more targets on the... Sorry, one second. Which position group got more targets on the Kansas City Chiefs? Was it the tight end position or was it the running back position? Tight end. It was the tight end position, 24.7 to 17.6. So, closer than on the Broncos, which was surprising for me with them having Kelsey there, but it was still the tight end. Which letter would you like, Jeff? Let's go with the R. An R. There are two R's in this puzzle. Two R's. 40 something tiles. Okay, let's go with another question, please. Another question. My question for you is who had more PPR fantasy points last season? Who had more PPR fantasy points? Was it Jamal Williams or was it Sonya Michelle? Michelle. It was Michelle. By about 30 points, which letter would you like, Jeff? Let's go with N. N. Ninkampoop. Ninkampoop. Well, thanks a lot, Jeff. You didn't have to say that. Okay. There are three Ns. You've got a nice little bankroll right here. This will be your last opportunity to buy a vowel or we can just go straight into your final question. No, let's go into the final question. Let's get some bank. He's not given anything to you guys. I like the strategy. My question for you is who had more PPR fantasy points last season? Who had more PPR fantasy points? Was it Tim Patrick or was it Terry McLaurin? More fantasy points. Let's go with McLaurin. It was McLaurin. Which letter would you like, Jeff? S. In S, there are three Ss in. Also, you are going to bank all 4,000 of this money, Jeff. But he's got five seconds to try to solve. Yeah, senile. I don't know. So close. We're going to go ahead and add that to your bank. And you've got a nice little lead now, Jail. It's your turn. Would you like a question or would you like to solve? I would like a question, please. Okay. Let's see. Your question, Jail. My question for you. Let's go over to the FanDuel Sportsbook. Are you ready for the FanDuel Sportsbook? Yeah, let's take a trip. Let's take a trip. Yeah, come on with me. Come on with me over here to the FanDuel Sportsbook. Yeah, come on. Vamanos. Which of these teams, Jail, according to the FanDuel Sportsbook, is more likely to win the Super Bowl? So it's more favored to win the Super Bowl. Is it the Baltimore Ravens or is it the Miami Dolphins? Ravens. The Ravens are correct, Jail. Which letter would you like? I can tell you guys are scarred from these like Super Bowl futures things because you start overthinking it. No way Dolphins are getting through the AFC that easy. You want a G? Let's go with G. Three Gs in this puzzle, Jail, going to give you 1,500. What would you like to do now? I would like to take another question, please. Okay. Who had more receptions last season, Jail? Who had more receptions? Was it Noah Phant or was it Christian Kirk? Kirk. Kirk is correct, Jail. Which letter would you like? Let's go with a T. A T. There are one, two, three, four, five T's in there. Going to add, oops. That's my bad. What are you doing, Jail? 4,000. You're up to 4,000, Jail. Jail, what would you like to do now? Do you want to buy a Valor? Or do you want another question? This is my last opportunity to buy Val's, right? Yes. I'm going to go with another question. Another question. Yeah. Okay. My question for you, Jail, is who had more receiving yards last season? Who had more receiving yards? Was it Brandon Ayuk or was it George Kittle? Oh, Ayuk. I'm sorry. It was George Kittle, Jail, which means we are going to move on to Joey so close to banking that 4K. Go directly to Jail. That was a pretty good one. I was waiting on that one. So far you're winning and everybody, if you're just joining now, if you don't have a Scott Fishbowl spot yet left, we are giving one out on the stream today for anybody that wants it, but only one person is going to get it. You need the best comment. You need to make us laugh. A comment that has to make us laugh. Joey, it's your turn. Would you like a question or would you like to solve? Question. You got to be looking at the chat because we can't look at the chat. I'm looking at the distance. I'm looking. Okay. My question for you, Joey, is who had more receiving yards this season? Who had more receiving yards? Was it Hunter Renfrow or was it Jacobi Myers? Had to be Hunter Renfrow. It did have to be Hunter Renfrow, correct. Which letter would you like? H. There is one H in this puzzle. What would you like to do now? Question because I can't buy any vows really, can I? You can buy a vowel if you want. I know the one I'm looking for. So, okay. Okay. Let's, Joey, you know what? It was getting kind of lonely with me. We took a trip there at the Fandall Sportsbook. Yeah. I'd like it if you would join us over here. You're ready to come?  Am I still here with you guys? Looks like you're still here. You're just sitting here. I'm just like a timeout. Yeah, it's a little awkward. I'm going to check for security because when you go to the Fandall Sportsbook, they check you at security. I don't know if you know that. Yeah, of course. I was checked in Phoenix. We've been there many, many times. I don't know if I would check. How would you even tell us that, Joey? In Biloxi. I can't remember if I was checked there or not at the Fandall Sportsbook. But I felt safe there. That's why I told everybody. Well, Joey, here's your question. Which of these teams is more favored to win the Super Bowl next season according to the Fandall Sportsbook? That's the one, the best team playing. Go ahead. Is it the Cincinnati Bengals? Or is it the Las Vegas Raiders? Wow. I'm going to say Bengals. The Bengals are correct. Joey, a plus 2200 compared to the Raiders at plus 4,000. That was a tough one. It's very tough divisions. Which letter would you like? M. In M, there are two M's at this puzzle. Joey, this will be your last opportunity to buy a vowel unless it gets back to you. What would you like to do? Buy an I. An I. There are two I's in this puzzle. What? What? Yeah. What is that first? What would you like to do now? Question. Questions. Okay. This is your last question, Joey. If you get this right, you will bank all this money. Okay. According to sleeper PPR ADP. Okay. Who is being drafted earlier? So who is currently being drafted earlier? PPR, this is PPR redraft ADP. Is it Travis Kelsey or is it Tyreek Hill? Travis Kelsey. Travis Kelsey is correct. Joey, back end of the first pick. Which letter would you like? L. L. There are two L's in this puzzle. Going to bring you to 2300. You've got five seconds to try to solve or we're going to move on to Jeff. Bonk, we're going to move on. But you do get to bank all of that money in jail. Let me get you back up to 4,000 here. Jeff, you ready for your question? Or would you like to solve? Nope. Let's take the question. No, nope. It's a solid nope. Okay. My question for you, Jeff. This is another who's more likely to win the Super Bowl question. According to the odds on the Fanduola Sportsbook. So according to the Fanduola Sportsbook, which of these teams is more likely to win the Super Bowl? Is it the Dallas Cowboys or is it the Tennessee Titans? The Cowboys. It is the Cowboys. You're absolutely correct. Which letter would you like? All right, let's go with a D. A D. There are two D's in this puzzle. Jeff going to add a thousand. You can buy a vowel. You can solve or you can take another question. I know it. Let me buy a vowel. Let me buy an E. An E. There are one, two, three, four, five, six, seven E's. I'm just going to subtract 500 since that's the limit. Oops. What would you like to do now? You want to buy another vowel or would you like to take a question or solve? You know what? I'm lacking a word there. So let me buy an A. An A. There are one, two, three, four A's. I'm guessing the one word that I didn't put an A in was the one you were struggling with. Yeah. And now you don't have enough money to buy another vowel but you can either take a question or solve. Right. So let's take a question. Okay. My question for you is who had more PPR fantasy points last season? Who had more PPR fantasy points? Was it Amari Cooper or was it Tyler Lockett? Cooper. I'm sorry, Jeff. It was Tyler Lockett. Tyler Lockett had a 241.4 to Amari Cooper's 202.5. Jail. I'm guessing you want to solve. Yes, I would love to solve. Sending late night trade offers to my league mates. Offers. It is sending late night trade offers to my league mates. That was a team effort, Jail. You guys made some money on that puzzle. Well done. All of you did. It's a close game. Jail now at 4,000. Joey at 5,700 and Jeff sitting on top at 6,000. That would have really sucked if I didn't get that. If I was sitting at zero. I'm thinking rumors.  Sending late night trade rumors to my league mates. Yeah. I hear Jail's going to try to send you to Tyreek Hill for his 2023 first round pick. But don't tell anyone. That's hilarious. That's what I'm hearing. We've all been there. You're up late. You can't sleep.  I'm like rumors doesn't end in ERS. Kenny Pickles. Oh man. Nice try, JWB. Nice try. Kenny Pickles did win the Scott Fishville spot earlier by someone saying Kenny Pickles, but it will not win again on this stream. Who wants to know? Do I grow my chest here myself? No, he outsources it. I do outsource it. I have other you know, and then they give it to me who've you know in Arizona with the field where they park it outside in the parking lot and they grow it out there. Then they rolled in during game time. Yep. It's like that. That's it. It's just like that. Yeah. That's why my chest here gets lighter in the summer because it's too hot here. It all just dies in the front yard whenever I put it out there. I get just how we named our company. That's how we name our company. Front yard fantasy. It's where Simon grows his chest here. Truck in here got this one right about six minutes ago. Nice job. That one.  Geek said he loved the Joey dance. Did you do a dance showing? Did I? I guess you did. Also, James so close with this one. Sons and eight night powers to my right. My what? To my what? Dame's doing my favorite thing in the chat is when you're in the chat, you've tried to fit something in there that makes no sense. Also, good job game. Chuck said my league mates wives are not going to be happy when I screenshot this to show them this is actually a thing. It's not just you Chuck late night trade offers are absolutely okay guys. Let's load up. I might be an early which one? The same team first thing. Yeah, Chuck. That is a that is a good one. You're in the lead right now. We'll see what happens. Same team first name. So these players are all in the same team and they have first names and these are those first names up here on the board. No last names. It is crossword style. So whenever you solve this one, you're just going to have to tell me the four names that are up there. The four lap for first names. That's out of the chat contest. I always struggle with these crossword ones. They are still targeted. I love also a JWB wanted to know ask Joey how many games he thinks his thirsty Thursday team will win next year. How many Joey five. Five. You know what? That's more than I thought you were going to say based on someone asking the question. Joey Jail got that one right. So you get to go first. Would you like a question? Or would you like to solve a question? Okay, now if I win more than five, I look great. And that was my strategy on that. Joey, we're we're already at the Fandal sports book, but we're going to change rooms over here. We're going to talk about something else. We're going to talk about some week one games. Okay. I love one games. And here's what I'm going to ask you. I'm going to ask you which team is favored in this week one matchup, which team is the betting odds favored according to the Fandal sports book? Okay. Is it the New England Patriots or is it the Miami Dolphins? Are you allowed to tell me where the games at? Yes, I'll tell you that it's the New England Patriots at the Miami Dolphins. The Dolphins are favored to win. Joey, that is absolutely correct. They're favored by two and a half points. So it's almost a push. They got that home field advantage pushing them over the edge. Which letter would you like? I would like a T. A T bonk. There are no T's in this puzzle. Joey, which means we're going to move on to Jeff. Jeff, I will take a question. No solving on this one. Let's see. We're going to stick on the same side of the ball over here or same room at the Fandal sports book. I just need you to tell me which of these teams is currently favored in their week one matchup? Which of these teams is currently favored in their week one matchup in the game? The Kansas City Chiefs at the Arizona Cardinals. Which team is currently favored according to the Fandal sports book? The Chiefs. The Chiefs are correct. Three point favorites on the road. Which letter would you like, Jeff? How about an N? An N. There is one N in this puzzle. I'm going to add 500. Would you like to buy a vowel? Take another question or? No, I'll take another question. Okay. Another question. My question for you is who had more receptions last season? Who had more receptions last season? Was it Stefan Diggs or was it? Jamar Chase? Diggs. Diggs is correct. Which letter would you like, Jeff? So this is, these are first names. These are first names. Yeah. Let's go with a J. J. I love this strategy, but there are no J names in this puzzle. So many J names in the world, Jeff. Everybody's name starts with J. Yeah, right? Yeah, Joey, Josh, J. There's a couple of them here. I know too many of them if you ask me. J.L., it's your turn. I wasn't talking about you, by the way. You're perfectly fine being here with your name starting with a J. Which letter would you, or before I ask you? I would like to start with a letter. N, M. M, M, M, M, M, M. Well, great. I'm glad that's your letter pre-picked, but in order to put it on the board, you're going to have to answer a question properly. Are you ready for your question? Yep. Okay. My question for you is who had more receptions last season? Who had more receptions? Was it Mike Evans or was it Darnell Mooney? Those are both of your guys. I know. I picked two guys I love. So you couldn't try to game it that way. You're going with who? Evans. I'm sorry. It was Darnell Mooney.   Mike Evans is the saint. Mike Evans is the best. He's a great, great man. You gave away Tom Brady's famous touchdown. Okay, but did he have as many receptions as Darnell Mooney? No, he had fewer. No, he did. But he had more fantasy points. Way more touchdowns. Yeah, a lot more. I think, I think 10 more touchdowns than Darnell Mooney. He had a lot of touchdowns. I think it was 14-4 if I'm remembering right for those guys. Joey needs Mike Evans anyway. I do. The Buccaneers do because there's no one else to catch the ball right now. They got Cameron Bray. And Scottie Miller. I'm Russell Gage. I'm excited for Russell Gage. Joey, would you like a question or do you want to solve a Jalen? There we go. Oh, Jalen Darden. Mike Evans. North Texas player. Yeah. A question, please. Okay. We are going to go with receiving touchdowns since we were just talking about some of that. Who had more receiving? Yeah, that's when they catch it in the end zone or catch it then run into the end zone. Oh, yeah. That's one or the other. Who had more receiving touchdowns last season? Was it Amari Cooper or was it Odell Beckham Jr.? Amari Cooper. Yeah, they're... Amari Cooper is correct, Joey, with eight to Odell Beckham's five. Which letter would you like? S. And S. Really? Two bonks and ropes. I'm getting the questions right, so I feel smart. Everyone's a winner. And if like two of the most common letters in the English language, you get your question right. Guess the common letter, bonk. But Jeff, Joey's bonk is your benefit. Are you ready for your question? Let's go with the question. Oh, God, I want that on t-shirt. My question for you, Jeff, is who had more targets last season? So who has targeted more times? Was it Chris Godwin or was it Dalton Schultz? Schultz-y. I'm sorry, it was Chris Godwin. Chris Godwin. Even in missing games, having more targets last year. Well, yeah, Godwin was gone what week 14, something like that. Yeah. It was way later in the year than I thought it was. Yeah. In my mind, he missed half the season. I answered too fast. You got excited. Jail. You got excited. It's me. It's on to you, man. It's on to me. Make it happen. Get this one wrong so I can get another letter on. All right, let's see how fast we can get. At least we have no letters up there. Okay, Jail. Are you ready for your question? Yeah. I'm going to ask you your other favorite kind of question that we've asked all the time. No, it is going to be another target share question based on position group. I actually like that one. So did you like that one? I did. Yeah. Okay. My question for you is which position group got more targets on the New Orleans Saints? Was it the running back position or the tight end position? I have a question. Yes. Does it say some hill count? I don't question. I have no idea, Jail. Probably not. All right. I'll go running back. Well, running back is correct with 28.6% compared to 18.4. I don't even know if I use him as a tight end very much at all. Yeah, I think he didn't have very many receptions. I think it's just fun to say now. Yeah. Jail, let's go with an M. Stay true to myself. M is in Nancy. I'm in Nancy's M. There is one thing in this puzzle. What would you like to do now? I'll take a, I'll take a question. A question. Okay. Also, I just saw someone in the chat that said, thanks, Simon and Leanne. I have no idea what you're thinking me and my girlfriend for because I missed the rest of the chat. Thanks, Simon and Leanne. Jail, another question is what you said. Yeah, I did. Okay. Week one. Which of these teams is favored in their matchup against each other? The Green Bay Packers are playing at the Minnesota Viking. Which of these teams is the favorite according to the FanDuel Sportsbook? Minnesota. I am sorry. It is the Green Bay Packers on the road as the favorite Jail. I'm sorry. I'm so sorry. Every time. Man, I just feel unbelievable guilt when you miss a question. It just hurts me to my core. I feel unbelievable guilt when I miss a question. Joey, are you ready for your question or would you like to solve that question, please? Okay. I felt like I was in pain when I said that. I was a little bit, but Joey, we're going to do some PPR fantasy points. Which of these players had more PPR fantasy points last season? Which of these players had more PPR fantasy points? Was it David Montgomery or was it Sony Michelle? David Montgomery. It is David Montgomery. God, I was trickling you like L. There's one L in this puzzle slowly, but surely you guys are getting here. I got one. So Joey, would you like another question? Yes. Okay. Let's go over to some receiving yards. Which player had more receiving yards last season had more receiving yards. Was it Stefan Diggs or was it Devonte Adams? Adams had a lot of touchdowns. I'm going to say Diggs. I'm sorry. It was Devonte Adams with 1553 to Diggs, 1225. Which means Jeff, we are back to you. Would you like a question or would you like to solve? Question. Okay. My question for you. Who had more rushing yards last year? Who had more rushing yards? Was it Leonard Fornette or was it Cordero Patterson? Oh, Fornette didn't run a lot. Patterson, maybe 700. Patterson. You were right on with Patterson's yards, but Fornette had more. Patterson had 618. Fornette had 812. So we are moving on to JL. We're back to you, JL. Do you want to solve or would you like a question? I need another question. Okay. Let's do some rushing yards. We're going to stick in rushing yards. Who had more rushing yards last season? Was it Daryl Henderson Jr. or was it Devonte Freeman? Daryl Henderson. You are correct by over 100 yards. Which letter would you like, JL? Let's go with... R. R. There are two Rs in this puzzle, JL. Going to add a thousand to your round bank. What would you like to do now? Would you like to buy a vowel? Would you like another question? What would you like to solve? I would like to buy a vowel. A vowel. Which vowel would you like? I would like that vowel to be an E. E. Well, there are two E's in this puzzle, JL. Now what would you like to do? I would like to buy another vowel, if I could. Okay, you can. Let's buy in... Let's buy in... an A. An A. There are three A's in this puzzle. Going to subtract another 300. Now what would you like to do, JL? I would like to... buy... I would like another question. Another question for JL. Okay, JL. Okay, I said it, I said it.  I said it, I said it. I'll accept it, all right? Okay, JL, relax. You have to answer a question. Give me a question, give me a question. My question for you, JL, is who had more receiving touchdowns last season? Who had more receiving touchdowns? Was it DeAndre Hopkins, or was it Cordero Patterson? Patterson. I am sorry. Yeah! Andre Hopkins with eight to Patterson's five. He had him beat by three, which means Joey, we're on you. If you'd like to solve, would you like a question, or would you like to buy a vowel? I'm going to solve, and this makes up for the two bonks, I feel. Okay. Well, you got to get it right first. I do, I do. Knock on wood. Adam, Alexander, Irv, and Kirk.   You got it. That was really nice. And I just wanted to give a shout out to Dane four minutes ago with very few letters on the board. Old Adam, Alexander, Kirk, Irv. Nice job, Dane. And nice job, Joey. That's going to give you a minimum of 1,000 and put you in the lead, but I think we have time for one more. No, we do talk about Minnesota Vikings. Let's go to the next puzzle. Bottom of the ninth. All right. And it is Jeff's turn. This is a movie player mashup in this one. So Jeff, we've had like, um, yeah, we've had like Boston, Scott Pilgrim versus the world and things like that. It could be any combination of first name, last name shoved into a movie title and that's how it's going to work here. Um, so you are up first. Would you like a question or would you like to solve? Question. Okay. My question for you is who had more receptions last season? Who had more receptions? Was it branding cooks or was it Deontre Swift? Cooks. Cooks is absolutely correct. Which letter would you like? I don't know. Uh, let's go with R. R. There are no R's in this puzzle, Jeff, a bonk there. So we're going to go on to J.L. Dale, it's your turn. Would you like a question or would you like to solve? Question. Okay. My question for you. Uh, who had more receiving yards last season? Who had more receiving yards? Was it Elijah Moore or was it Hunter Henry? Elijah Moore. I'm sorry. Joey, we're on to you. Your favorite category play movie mashup. Would you like to solve or would you like a question? I like question. Okay. We're going to stick in receiving yards. Who had more receiving yards last season? Was it Meekle Hardman or was it Jarvis Landry? Maybe gritty now, man. Meekle Hardman. It was Meekle Hardman. Joey, which letter would you like? T. Well, there are two T's in this puzzle. Going to add a thousand to your round bank. Would you like to buy a vowel or would you like another question? I'll buy a vowel. A vowel. Which vowel would you like? O. And O, there is one O in this puzzle. High. Would you like to buy another vowel or would you like a question? Question. Okay. My question for you is who had more PPR fantasy points last season? Who had more PPR fantasy points? Was it Ezekiel Elliott or was it A.J. Dillon? A.J. Dillon. I'm sorry. It was Ezekiel Elliott with more PPR fantasy points last season, which means Jeff, we're back to you. Would you like a question? I did. Let's go with a question, please. Simon. Who had more PPR fantasy points last season? Was it Keenan Allen or was it Amari Cooper? Keenan Allen. Keenan Allen is correct. Which letter would you like? Building on the N and Keenan, I'm going to take N. N. N. There is one N in this puzzle, Jeff. It's going to be 500. That helps a lot. Another question, please. Another question. Okay. My question for you is who had more passing yards last season? So who threw for more passing yards? Was it Aaron Rodgers or was it Kyler Murray? Rodgers. Rodgers is correct by about 400 yards. Which letter would you like? I don't know. Let's try H. There are three H's in this puzzle. Going to add 1,500 to your bank. Jeff, this is your last opportunity to buy a vowel or you can take your last question or solve. Oh, Jesus. Let's go with a question so I can get bank. Okay. Here is your final question. If you get this right, you get to bank that money. Who had more rushing touchdowns last season? Who had more rushing touchdowns? Was it Derek Henry or was it Alvin Camara? Henry. Henry is absolutely correct. Doesn't matter that he missed all that time. Which letter would you like? I don't know. If this is up there, you bank this money. Let's go with a G. A G? There are no G's in this puzzle, Jeff. Which means we're moving on to JL. JL, what would you like to do here? And that's how you lose. Oh, God, I need to take a question. I know it, but I need to take a question. Oh, because you want to win. Okay, JL, my question for you is who had more passing touchdowns last year? So who threw for more passing touchdowns last year? Was it Dak Prescott or was it Kirk Cousins? Dak Prescott. Dak Prescott is correct. Which letter would you like? I would like a B. There are two B's in this puzzle, JL. It's going to add a thousand. I'm guessing you want another question. I'll take another question. Okay, my question for you is who had more rushing yards last season? Who had more rushing yards? Was it Javante Williams or was it Jalen Hurts? Javante Williams. Javante Williams is correct, JL. Which letter would you like? I'll take an M. An M. There are two M's. This is your last opportunity to buy a vowels. Would you like a question? Would you like to solve? What do you want to do? I would like a question, please. Okay. My question for you, JL, is who had more receiving yards last season? Who had more receiving yards? Was it KJ Osborne or was it Dallas Goddard? KJ Osborne. I'm not sorry at all. It was Dallas Goddard. And we are moving on to Joey. Would you like to solve? I know it, I know it, but I have to take questions because if I'm going, yeah, I do. If you solve, you win. No, I can only get a minimum of $600, $700. But I only get a minimum of $1,000 and Jeff banked that $2,000, so he'd have $8,000. You don't bank it if you don't get it right. I could not bank that much. Yeah, I didn't bank. I got a wrong letter on the third question. Joey, if you solve it, you win. Okay. I'm going to solve it. Hot Chubb Time Machine. It is Hot Chubb Time Machine. Hot Chubb Time Machine is our NFL player movie. I swear I thought Jeff banked on it. I almost had the perfect comeback. Almost, if I would have had a letter, I think, yeah, then you would have had to take a question there. Yeah, if you would have gotten that letter right, Jeff, it was right there. Almost pulled the W out. We had Lidaria's in here with Hot Chubb Time Machine. Dame, I think was the first one to get it. But Nate in here saying, are you going to the mall later? That's what I'm asking. Wants to know showing that they know what's up there. The Mr. Scampers with the Hot Chubb Time Machine as well. Nice job on that one. Guys, Nate, that's funny. That's a pretty good comment, Nate. Okay. So guys, the time has come. I think those are our two finalists right there. That comment that we just put up there. Where did it go? He just beat that in the whole show. It is my lead mate's wives are not going to be happy when I screenshot this to show them this is actually a thing. And Nate Schlotman saying, are you going to the mall later? That's what I'm asking. Which one of these is more deserving of a Scott Fishbowl spot? I'm going, Nate. You're going, Nate. Nate got a laugh out of you, Jeff. If you're voting. Yeah, I'm on team Nate. I like that. I like that response. So I'm not going to go against the group. Okay. Nate, congratulations. If you're not already in the Scott Fishbowl, you have just earned yourself a Scott Fishbowl spot with that. Congratulations, Nate. Congratulations. Yeah. Um, congratulations.  Join the Orlando live division to meet me in person. Or don't. Maybe he's not in Orlando. That might be a tough stretch for him. Nate, I will pay 1% of your airfare. If you decide. 1% That's so, that's so kind of you. 1% man. Wait, I might not have like $10. Half of a percent. You can have 1% of Joey's miles to go towards a flight to get to Orlando. Oh, I got cold cash. I can give him all my cold cash. I want for tonight. And I think, uh, I think only frontier takes cold cash though. If I'm not mistaken, that would make sense. Yeah. And they're gone. Right. Joey swept this game. Didn't he? He swept Joe. Joey pulled the W out on this one. He got that last question right, adding a thousand bringing him to 7,700 Jeff in second place with 6,000 JL in last place with less than both of the other contestants. Jeff, thank you so much for taking the time to come on with us today. We really appreciate it. Yeah. No, thank you. Always fun. Always fun.  You were so close this time. You'll get that W next time. You did that. Unless I'm playing. Then I'm taking that W guys. So mad. I hit two out of three. You were right there, J. All the strategy almost worked. That's going to be it for us. But before we go, a couple of reminders. Number one, if you're not already following Jeff, go and do that right now. He's on Twitter at Jeff Hasley right there below his name. He's pointing to it on the screen. So make sure you guys go follow him over there after that. If you're watching this, hit that like button on this video and subscribe to FanDuel on YouTube. And if you enjoyed what we're doing here, we do this every single day Monday through Friday at 3 p.m. Eastern time. We don't stop. We just keep on playing games every day. So if you enjoy this, subscribe to our channel at Front Yard Fantasy and hang out with us at 3 p.m. To play some more of these games. Until Monday though, we are out of here. Thank you everybody for tuning in. Congratulations on the Scott Fishbowl spot. We're out of here. Adios. Bye-bye. I guess trading makes fantasy fun. Josh, don't know what to do. Trading makes fantasy.


The useful life of electrical and electronic equipment, EEE, has been shortened as a result of technological advancements and changes in consumer patterns. This has led to the generation of large amounts of electronic waste, e-waste, which must now be properly managed. Due to environmental pollution and global regulations, the handling of e-waste, including burning it in incinerators, dumping it in landfills, or shipping it overseas, is no longer permitted. Furthermore, the presence of precious metals, PMs, makes e-waste recycling economically attractive. In this paper, current metallurgical processes for extracting metals from e-waste, including existing industrial routes, are reviewed. Mechanical processing, hydrometallurgical, and pyrometallurgical routes are critically analyzed. Pyrometallurgical routes are more cost-effective and environmentally friendly when controlling hazardous emissions. Currently, pyrometallurgical routes are used to segregate and upgrade PMs, gold and silver, into base metals, PMs, copper, lead, and nickel. These base. This article was authored by Abdul Khaliq, Muhammad Akbar Ramdhani, Jeffrey Brooks, and others. We are article.tv, links in the description below.


Hello, good. Well, it's not morning anymore, but good, exactly good noon. To my talk, Fedora Chora is an action in the context of operating system for virtual appliances. And when I started to think about giving a talk at DefConf in general, I thought, well, Fedora Chora is surely I will be the first one. Turns out, absolutely no. If you just look at the talks given at DefConf about Chora in general, there are a lot of talks. And so a lot of topics were already covered. Surprisingly enough, when I looked at the talks or skipped through them one by one, I saw that not a lot of practice experience was already shared. Only for example, 2021 up and running with Fedora Chora S or getting started with Fedora Chora S are really intended to give you an introduction to Fedora Chora S. A lot of the other ones are just deep dives into certain features or certain aspects or yada, yada, yada of Fedora Chora S. So that was a bit surprising. So I thought, well, that's a good gap for me, because I have a little bit of a particular experience I can give you about Fedora Chora S. And this is what we are talking about today. So what do I mean with inaction? Because that could mean anything. This is the concluded experience from mainly me, but also some colleagues in current company or in former companies. And when I started working with Fedora Chora S, we basically then started from scratch. So there wasn't really anything. Also means the last point, limited experience. We also had a scratch experience. So Fedora Chora S at that point was a new word for me. And also virtual appliances were a new word for me. And in concluded now, it's about one year, maybe a little bit more of experience developing and supporting a virtual appliance or other use cases on Fedora Chora S. So I have some things and I matured in a way, but at that point we will come. Good table of content.  If this will not be enough information to you to fully understand the whole slides, well, good thing. Hopefully there will be a YouTube video of this. If nothing goes wrong. And so we just recheck the links that I put into the slides and then just look at the talk again. Then we will come to, okay, I don't understand what a virtual appliance is, what a Fedora Chora is meant to be. How do we actually get started developing? Again, here we will provide some links for further reading and testing and tutorializing. And once you are over the proof-of-concept phase, now it gets into the really interesting problems. How do you actually get production ready? How do you make now this proof-of-concept into a real product that your customer can actually use? And after that, my personal experience or more personal experience, especially points that I think I did not use as intended. Then, of course, the normal last chapter's conclusion questions, thanks and the appendings if we have the time. If not, we will have to look in the slides. Also, note that please put your answer questions directly into the chat so they are not forgotten, would be a shame. And then I will go over it at the end. And furthermore, as mentioned already, I will have links all across the slides. And they have cryptic numbers just on them, like you see in scientific writing. So, be sure to access the slides as a PDF in the schedule thingy website where the slides are uploaded so you can actually access them for further reading. Good. And I am trying out a lot of stuff today with this presentation. So please give me feedback with anything that occurs to you as feedback worthy. Good. So, let's start finally with the talk itself, the basics. So, what is Fedora-Cora? Fedora-Cora, at first, is a quite minimalistic operating system that has one major focus or one of the major focus is container execution. So, this, for example, means you do not have to think about which container execution, how it's called, container runtime, do I need, which one do I should I install, which one can I install, which actually is supported with Fedora-Cora. You just get Podman out of the box and it runs really well. And it's also really well supported. I never had problems with Podman on it. Another interesting point is Fedora-Cora is not like your usual Ubuntu Manjaro Arch Linux image. So, when you first boot Fedora-Cora, you will see that there's no such thing as an install script, as an install graphical user interface, nothing, it just boots up. Basically, what you have for Fedora-Cora is always a disk, more or less, with the full operating system already on it. So, the startup is also pretty easy in the first setup. Beyond that, we have that first setup, but that is just more or less a skeleton. You fill that skeleton with something called ignition. And this ignition uses, if I'm not wrong, cloud init to do certain stuff in the operating system during boot. For example, creating system d-units, creating files, creating folders, whatever you like, has a lot of things you can do. And also a note, this is mainly where I developed Fedora-Cora as I did not touch Fedora-Cora as itself. I mainly interacted with the ignition and which files were put where and scripts and what, yada, yada, yada. Good. And also very interesting about Fedora-Cora, which will get important later also, is some parts of Fedora-Cora are immutable. There's also a quite interesting block entry. I think it's linked number two. But also I have a look at that because often it's referenced as an immutable operating system, which it is not. Otherwise, you cannot write anything anywhere. You can write to certain folders, so it's just partly immutable. But even though just some parts are immutable, that can greatly help later on. And then what is appliance or virtual appliance? Appliance is a package that contains all your software in one package. Everything is included to run it. So the virtual appliance is just the same but with the operating system. So basically it's a virtual machine. But your application is on their default configuration, maybe default resource files, whatever is needed, that your application as a default instance of what you want to deliver your customer is already there and just needs a hypervisor or bare metal and then go. So that's another, not bare metal type of visor in that case. So that's a virtual appliance. And now why should you choose exactly this combination? Because you can deliver virtual appliance more or less with any operating system, as I said, with Ubuntu, with Arch Linux, whatever you like. I think Fedora-Cora is a good match for the reasons just set with the minimalistic idea of the operating system. But also it's quite easy to maintain for certain reasons. And by that, I mean, it has a feature that automatically applies updates. And they are very careful about applying updates in such a manner that it does not break any system. So it's just some update and well, if it breaks something at the operating system, we don't care. It's carefully done. Of course, there will be breaking changes, but that's another matter. And also it's just another way to ship your application, especially is I have the feeling that software engineers in my generation of software engineers always think about containers and there are only containers. But of course, it's not only containers. You can ship your application if it's a Java application, just as a jar. That fits the exact use case you have and the customers you have and compliance and whatever controls. Maybe that's a good solution. Maybe also the virtual appliance is a good solution to also deliver a virtual machine with it. It could be a good fit. And of course, there are official use cases and also what I like, anti-use cases for Fedora-Cora, so that's pretty nice. And I see that I'm talking too much about the basics. So I just make it quick with the next point. Why did I choose it? Well, I did not have a big choice. It was a legacy when I started working with Fedora-Cora as in virtual appliances. There was already a proof of concept, so that's it. And currently, I'm working with Fedora-Cora just because I now am used to it and I enjoy it very much. Good. How do you start developing? That's a very short slide. At the beginning, initially, I thought, well, I want to also show you or present you or at least give you some scripts due to time limitation that was not possible. If you want scripts, I want to see how I would approach a script, a build script, for example. Let me know and I will create one. Besides that, have a look at the linked resources, because they spend their main point of the video or the talk is to give you an introduction. So this is way more than I could give you now in these 20 minutes. And also, besides that, I strongly recommend VirtualBox, but that's just a personal preference. VirtualBox just always worked on any platform, so on Linux machines and Mac machines and one or two times also Windows machines. VirtualBox just worked for this combination of Fedora-Cora as in virtual appliances. I also tried Kimu, for example, on Mac in preparation of this talk and somehow I wasn't able to fully get it to work. Not sure why. And also VMware, for example, needs another step until you can import a virtual appliance. Yeah, so that's it. So, okay, now to get to the important part. So when you are thinking and you have your proof of concept already there and it works to some degree pretty good and you think, well, we shall continue with that one. And then there's a question, okay, now how do we get this to production? How do we make, how do we actually solve the problem of our customer? And you may have certain constraints while thinking about that. One of the more important constraints is, will your virtual appliance be online? So has it a connection to the internet? And can it also be connected from the internet? Or not? Because if you're thinking about, well, we have upgrades and, I don't know, we just put some upgrade files for our virtual appliance somewhere central, like Artifactory or something, with a public IP and that's fine. If some of your customers only want to apply or run your virtual appliance in a complete offline environment, what do you got to do?  And also then when we're already talking about updating, oh, by the way, I'm using upgrading and updating interchangeably. So the update path is the same as the Fedora CoreOS, I think more or less. At some point, you always have breaking changes. That's at some points in the development that just, I think, what it sometimes happened. And then to not break the systems of your customers, you need to follow a certain update path. So for this version and this version, and then they're fine to do whatever they want. But they have to follow this path first. Otherwise, something goes very wrong. And you get a call at 3am, which nobody wants. And so that's also a thing. Do you really, do you want to maybe to prepare these kind of things? So for example, implement a logic that the user calls to update the virtual appliance. And then in this logic, there's also a check, okay, which version am I am a certain update path or not with the version that would now be the one that updating to, would that leave the path but not. And then you could message the customer or the user that's currently updating, well, do not update to this version because reasons. So yeah, and another problem is limited access to the virtual appliances. As I said, maybe he or she, the admin of the customer, only wants in an offline environment, the virtual appliance. So if something goes wrong, and they need support, what now you cannot access. It's because maybe they do not have a how it's called a jump host of some sorts. So you cannot access your product, you're supposed to debug what you're gonna do. So that's also another thing that you have to think about. Also, what this also implies is, if you need to be, what I also mentioned, if you need to do an update, it cannot be you who does the update because you cannot access this. So the user must do the update, he must interact with the machine. And that can need to just usability questions, but we come to that now as a good transition to the second point of customer expectations. That's okay, the user has now to interface with the virtual machine and have to do stuff. So why not make it usable for him? Why not make it nice, make it easy. So what could be an example is a script or some program you created that offers the normal things you have to do on the virtual appliance, like an update, or maybe also something very easy like a restart. So they don't have to type in sudo, what is it, shutdown now or reboot. So just make it a little bit nicer to him. Of course, this is then maybe not the highest priority of things you should take care about, but also certain things. And also with virtual appliances, like for any project, you should always think about guaranteeing continuity, not in terms of availability of your application, but rather, if something goes wrong, can their customer in context of the contract we have with them, can he contact someone of tech? If someone of the team gets sick, can someone take over, especially if some critical bug is occurring, and so back and so forth, or the all well known truck factor or lottery factor, bus factor, if someone gets hit by a truck. Next day, you lost your virtual appliance guy, what now? So of course, as in any other project, you need documentation, you need testing, basic, and more people need to know about the stuff, but that should be quite the basics. Yeah, and support considerations, that's what I meant. If it's completely locked and you have limited access in terms of maybe no access, then you cannot get firsthand access about bugs at the customer. So you cannot directly access a virtual appliance and see, is this file still there? What does this file contain? What version is blah blah running? You have to think about what can your customer do to send you certain parts of the virtual appliance, so you can then debug these parts. So what you could do, for example, you can make like a zip file or tar file or whatever that contains specific configuration files or folders or elements of files that are now then packed together, and then this file is then somewhere on a well known path on the virtual appliance, or maybe even retrievable via HTTPS. I'm sorry, Michael, to interrupt you, but we hit 20 minutes mark, so we should slowly go to Q&A. So please finish the idea. Good, then I'll talk way too much. So then to finish this very important point is here comes the prose of the immutable part of your system, because if the virtual appliance at the customer is the same version as you're in a development machine, then this means that it looks the same. These parts of the system look exactly the same. You don't need to debug those. What you need to debug is immutable parts, and that's exactly what this package then would be for to debug what they changed. Besides that, good points. One thing still to mention before the Q&A is the ignition file, because we are righted horribly wrong. Ignition is meant to be used once at the very first boot of the virtual appliance. That's the idea. What I did is executed every boot. So this is absolutely not how it's meant to be used, but on the other hand, you know that certain files and folders after restart look a certain way. So you more or less extend the term immutable is not really right here, but you know how certain things look like after restart. So this extends the immutable part of the system. So that's actually in this case, we had I had like it worked out well. Good. And yeah, said have to skip these things. Yeah, okay, we can come to the Q&A. Thank you for the interesting talk, Michael. So it seems there is one question for now from Clement Verna. Do you have virtual appliances using Fedora CoreOS testing and the next stream to test early the OS updates? Oh, yeah, good point. I also saw that there's a CoreOS engineer, at least it was an attendees list. So I was afraid of tricky questions. And this is a good question, because when I remember correctly, Fedora CoreOS community as explicitly tells you, not tell you, but want you to also use the testing in extremes to report bugs. I guess as a way of paying them back or contributes also to the project, which I think is very fair. But I did not do it because I was not really familiar with all the setup. And I just read about that in the last two months. And we're thinking of ways to implement that currently. Thank you for the answer. There is another question from Andreas. Is there a documentation or how to deploy a micro shift on Fedora CoreOS? Oh, good point. Because OpenShift is one of the main use cases for Fedora CoreOS. But sadly, I do not have experience with OpenShift or I guess MicroShift is a smaller version of OpenShift. Sadly, no experience with that. But also have to Google, like anyone else.


1. The objective of the study was to describe the associations between age and sex with the risk of COVID-19 in different severity stages ranging from infection to death. 2. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted as part of the study. 3. PubMed and Mbase were used as data sources through 4 May 2020. 4. The study included cohort and case control studies that evaluated differences in age and sex on the risk of COVID-19 infection, disease severity, intensive care unit, ICU, admission and death. 5. Data was extracted from published studies and data acquired by contacting authors using random effects meta-analysis. 6. The New Castle Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias. 7. A total of 59 studies comprising 36,470 patients were included in the analyses. 8. The methodological quality of the included papers was high, 8.2 out of 9. 9. Men had a higher risk for infection with COVID-19 and women, relative risk, R1.08, 95% Ci1.03 to 1.12. 10. When infected, they also had a higher risk for severe COVID-19 disease, R1.18, 95% Ci1.10 to 1.27, a higher need for intensive care, R1.38, 95% Ci1.09 to 1.74, and a higher risk of death, R1.50, 95% Ci1.18 to 1.91. 11. The analyses also showed that patients aged. This article was authored by Maurice P. Zegers, Bart G. P. Jules, Shahob Jolani, and others.


My title will be the MOOCs for General Law Courses, and I will use the experience of the NOU, National Open University, and talking about the potential for international collaboration. And myself is also the Associate Professor of Law at the Faculty of Social Science at the National NOU, National Open University. So the general, the facility will be divided into four parts. First, I will talk about why we are teaching the general courses. And then the second question will be why we are using the MOOCs for general law courses. And then followed by sharing the experience of the NOU and the Department of Social Science. Now we will pick up two examples, first is the course of life technology and law. The second will be the criminal exploration. Then we will review how these work and also we can present some of the reflection and the conclusion, and also discussing the potential for further international collaboration. Next slide, the first issue, why general courses? As everybody knows, the legal education can be generally divided into two parts. The first is the professional legal education. The second one will be general legal education. The professional legal education are normally provided to train the practitioner of the legal system such as lawyer justice, then also the future scholar of law, then also the person who are interested in policy stating. But as everybody knows, most of the professional legal education are provided in a very formal way. They are normally at the university level, or in some states such as the US, USA, they are also opposed to the degree of that. And why we are teaching about the general law courses? Because in contrast to professional legal education, general law courses are just to help the ordinary people, the lay people, to understand what will be the law and how the legal process and how the legal system works. The purpose is simple, because understanding how our legal system in each nation will be a very critical and a very core mission for any people to be a citizen of modern state. And also the law, the concept of progressive service, the foundation of civil society, is very important. And further, for practical need, every day we can encounter a lot of legal issues in our daily life, for instance the car accident or any kind of a business transaction or even you are rent a house. So all you need to have some general knowledge about law and to provide you to help to plan your life and also to any kind of further issue. And you need, in case of dispute, you need to have some legal knowledge. And why MOOCs will work for general law courses? Because the traditional or especially the professional legal education, they are talking the traditional way by lecture, discussion, or some case study and such. So that will be presented kind of in-depth discourse between teacher and the student to what is law. A lot of abstract and conceptual application are talking about. So the key issue for students is how easy we can make to let layman, not a professional lawyer to be, to understand such a complicated and also abstract system of law. So multimedia, if properly designed and used, can provide a very powerful and very effective tool to let students understand how laws work in action and how we can use that. For instance, in terms of just a legal concept, the tort, the tort will be if you are using a legal term to say there will be a legal act that is willful or negligent by one person which injures the right or interests of another person and the cost them causing some damage to another person. So there will be a lot of abstract and the concept such as what is illegal, what is intent, what is the cocession, such as that. That's why we require a lot of intensive discourse between the teacher and student to further how they are going to work with that. But in fact, only if you understand the idea, we can use a simple image of what you said like the picture corrects them during the people just run against the red light and hit other person. Then they will press precisely get this the best idea of what is going on and what you mean by this legal proficiency. Then let's see how MOOCs for general cocession are over in Taiwan. Actually, there are a lot of five very popular MOOCs platform in Taiwan. That's the Taiwan Live and E1. E1 is a private platform. That's all the MOOCs and open life in the e-learning platform. E-learning is just a specifically focused tool for civil service members who are interested in increasing their knowledge. But by further look, we can see that there are very limited calls about general localization. For instance, for E1, the private platform, there are more than 2,000 courses over there. But only about less than 10 are truly about the general localization. Mostly they are talking about the human rights law or general IP laws or constitution law. And why would that? That is probably because the platform is just kind of providing of those courses. They are not engaging in production of those courses. They are not engaging in production of MOOCs courses. They really require a lot of skill and also equipment, hardware, both hardware and software. And then, so we come to sharing with you our experienced NOU and DSC. NOU is a national open university that tries to be the most post-secondary education, especially on the digital learning and online learning. There are also together six departments in the NOU, in which NOU is also the operator of the Taiwan-like one of the most popular MOOCs platform in Taiwan. Actually, most of the general localization provided by NOU are over by the DOS, the Department of Social Science. They are having a lot of basic idea about the most substantive law and also the procedure law, like a city procedure or a criminal procedure. And the MOOC courses are offered via two tracks. The first is prime track. Mostly these courses in this track are provided on online learning. And the second there are supplementary track. Mostly are some kind of special programs. The special programs are more career-oriented with more in-class teaching, but also supported with online learning. This is open with some kind of administrative support by our Extension School and the local teaching center. And total law courses generally provided by the Department of Social Science about we are planning to within four or five years, students can take about all together 30 courses, about general law courses. This is because we think still in my plan as a plan to study and also to graduate in four or five years. Let's then talk about some specific examples. The first course is called Life Technology and the Law, this course is about the 18-weeks courses. We're basically focusing on the introduction to our legal system and legal proceeding. We're also talking about the general IP law and business. And also focus on how the technology development impacts our social life. For instance, like the data protection and privacy protection and also internet crime and surrogate motherhood. All these kind of social issues that people are interested in in their daily life will be the subject of this course. And the course is composed of about 30 or more minutes per unit. Each unit will have some kind of a combination of lectures, panel discussion, dramas, or news clipping, or even invited commentator or judge or lawyer to make some comment. And after each session there will be a quiz if I bring out a student to answer on the screen. And how these course students are evaluating and also grading. We have offered this course two times. The first time there will be mostly the online study only, with also four times online teaching. So just submit their report for grading. But the second time there will be much more students. So there will be also supporting with the in-class teaching that also written in the nation. So the attendance of this course, first time we over discussed in 2016, there will be altogether 261 students. And in the last year, the fall semester of 2019, we have a lot of more students, more than 700 students. Reflections from students. So students for future, that will be a little bit difficult for us to assess the actual status of students learning and status of their progress, especially in the first time over, we are only use the online system. And also the second issue with the content is that there will be some kind of technology problem outside of course the internet overflow. But still after reading a session, they want to answer the quiz question at the screen probably. And they want to finish one question and they want to go back again. The screen just disappeared or something. This kind of deep technical issue make students are kind of a complaint about how it's going on. Sorry. Yeah, your time's up. Oh, I'm sorry. Yeah, your time's up. So because we have a very tight schedule, so I'm sorry I have to interrupt you. I will upload my material in my session column. So everybody welcome to give it some comment. Thank you.


What's up everybody, Jason here from JaspysCaseBreaks.com. We have a little national. Our stuff is actually back. Boxman Mike just got here last night from all the things that we brought from the national, including some of the mixer products that we needed to get here, the Big Head Express. So it's all here today, guys. So we can break it all today, sell out the promo today, and give away all that break credit we're giving away and all the prizes. So this one's sold out on Monday, guys. This is a four spots in the national football mixer giveaway. We're giving away four spots in 2020 Prison Football One Pack Break Round on teams number two. Number three is on the website, it's down to four left. All we have to do is sell out number four and that sells off the mixer. So okay guys, first we do the break, we randomize the customer names and teams, distribute the hits out, then at the end of the break, we'll take all 32 customer names, randomize them, and the top four get a spot each in the football mixer. So dice roll it here. Here's the list of customer names, teams, do the break, and then we'll randomize the customer names again. So let's go first, here we go. Roll it, it is a five and a six. Five and a six, 11 times, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, and a six, John down to Joshua. Six times, six times, or sorry, 11 times, one, two, three, four, five, seven, eight, nine, 10, and 11. Ravens down to the Chicago Bears. All right, again, stick to what you got. We'll randomize, or sorry, we'll alphabetize the customer names. Quickly give you a glance at who you got. Do the one pack break right here, randomize customer names again. See who gets the free spots in the mixer. Take a glance at your teams, guys, and then I'll do the break really quick. Close it, here we go. Green Scope coming up. Ryan Kerrigan, the new Eagle. Green Scope to 75, Gandy Golden, and a little Jaylen Hertz. There you go, guys. Now let's switch scenes and randomize customer names. Top four, get a spot in the mixer. There's customer names again. Roll three and a four, seven times. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, Patrick, Joshua, and Martin. There you go, congratulations. Boom, top four, get in. Seven times, congratulations, guys. Number three's on the website, guys. It is down to six left, or four left now. We can get that done. Upload number four, and that sells out the mixer, guys. Appreciate it, Jasperyskatesbreaks.com.