आदी मज़चानकर अपनी यहाग़ा और मादर है नहीं बच्छानकर मेंकि अपनी आदीं अपनी। आब वायदे लिए जाड़ प्येऔ, नहीं श्पकते रथमेन... आपनी और प्येजा़ वोड़िया... दिर Josh पूस्ट टहासath पूस्ट थो Grow अग़ शकद हूँ ईभन An वो job अग़ भी सोच घरह term अग़ सईख नाज ईबना घर इश Jen वॆत ऍ signs idea fra ab पूस दो चाह ऒ़ this is the maximum height okay at the maximum height there exists only one velocity which is the horizontal component of the velocity okay sure at the initial point there exist two types of velocities responsible for the movement of the projectile one is called the vertical component of the velocity which is u sin theta and another one is called the horizontal component of the velocity called as u cos theta this is it what you require for today's quiz g i got it so could you repeat whatever you said because i was like i had some internet issues okay yeah who is it like speaking man sir shivam yeah shivam this was for all of those who are like who did not come to me in contact this week got it whatever we have covered about projectile in the classroom it is related with that shivam okay sir got it thank you sir no problem and along with that for everyone please remember that i have shared with your cheat sheet right use that cheat sheet okay there are formulae for h formulae for r there are formulae for 10 like time of flight okay clear clear clear clear are for ready everyone are for ready good 59 people in good good good good good good 60 people in good good good good good good good good good good good good good so yes are for ready are for ready are for ready are for ready what's the code my dear friend it is 3 3 1 2 9 okay all of you have the cheat sheet ready with you this hr is hr is hr. s hr is hr is hr is hr is hr. sir the one you treated last class only two square sin square theta by two g is h maximum right. r is two times of horizontal component of velocity multiplied with vertical component of velocity divided by g time is two times of use sin theta by g got it. got it? ये योई ख़ान ऑी में होग़ा था.  छद पANSusta रेलाक्स, this was the question, I am solving it for everyone, if post explanation you have a doubt, please, so, the point of agenda, the point of conversation is about the r, r for the sake is stated as 2 u cos theta and u sin theta by g अर नो, only those who want to state are no should reply, I repeat only those who want to state are no should reply, good, no reply regarding an variable अर नो, now my dear friend, everything is constant, theta is same, so this is not going to change, when the initial velocity is doubled, the new factor will be 4 times, which is a daily top, g, i don't respond अर नो, that's because 2 u into 2, that will be 4 अर नो, exactly, exactly, g i don't respond, if you still have a doubt send me an x गुत क्तना, very good, relaxed, good आदित्या अनधा, very good, good दर थ Vij cush the, very good, very good, very good, I'll repeat अर थ! The point is that the agenda of conversation is about r, range, the range with its very well formula stated as 2 यसर नो, one time u cost theta and u sin theta by g तच्टानि अनत्टेदवात लयूँ दरने ख्लेगे तरी जाँवाग. कती आदिए आदिए, �いう वो आदिए दो गो तरी इगा वहाँ वह जा वहाँ आदिए वो तरी जाँवाग थे. तच्टानि आजिए ज़ावाग, वो जुक्तानि जावाग. its all good huh now good but very let's look at the leader board 26 people will be there and telling you this is going to be a good learning experience provided you surrender yourself toward just open your mind what comes out what you know. i have given you a cheat sheet it's kind of a reading comprehension apply that and आद गड दान्सर ख़िया ख़िया वी गो अद दे लीड़बोड आद प्लीस रिमेंभा मैं लिक्विस्ट दाद ज़ियोस दे चाट बोक्ष जुटीश्यस्ली नम्रता रागभ अदित्या शीराम गुट गुट गुट गुट गुट जोगनी बादों करे रुग लिए रागभ रागभ लम्प रद गड पिछ जी ठादिया गर नहीं भी पा Clearly । चर टोगनि तर लगा । आप वी अद नहीं. आप लिए मुझी आदी आप बाद़ वोग्ट. रागभ अद जो आदित प्यत रूव । indispensly doubled will be quadrupled will be relax read and response by the time i completely read it and reach down looking at the time 25, 28 people had already responded thats a good thing what you did is the same thing which was done for the previous question instead of writing the formula for R you have to state the formula for H same scenario instead of R we are now talking about the H dot , what is the formula of our capital H ? , capital H is equals to u squared sine square theta y to g , nothing is changed the only change is observed here , you became to you, squaring will make it 4 times which in English is called as fourth ripple योग अग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग योग यो� तहीड ख़ब और तू� light । वहाँ, सशीच तहीच वो आशिच बागत मैं Ashes said x, ok, Ashes, I will come back. और थे ठाशीच मैं? You can unmute and talk about it. वहाँ तूद बागत मैं? जू, yes, Ashes. वहाँ, और उसभी थूपतर्टूदूपतर्टूपतर्टूपतर॥ eyelashes, can you unmute. how you got ok. Chalo witchi let's take out the ratio. H old by h new, right or not was equal to-I'll just erase it out. so h old by h new as it is is equal to u square let it be रजन्ज़ के साण्च्श्खवर ञूडि & वूडि लिए ख़ूह ये। पर श्वाइ आफ़आद वाई वुए वूआअप वोट रजन्च्चवर घ� them आप आप और ञे रज і मैंगी तब ख़ूद रजन्चचशकते है नुहीत ख़िनक्रवाव घर ख़िनक्रवारव होगा आश producción, ख़िनक्रवार्व and any other friends of mine गोड, अचोच, ठीट वरेगर, वरے, ठीट वरेगर is the leader board and next question वरच़ा प्रजटील वरच़ा प्रजटील वरच़्ा प्रजटील ख़ील, वली रच़्ा प्रजटील So, now this is an 8th great question. Total energy is conserved, momentum is conserved, energy and momentum both are conserved, nothing is conserved. It is completely a waste of time, freely means no motor or the fueled thingy, right. थी जोगे bloom technically isו ईदी योंन्किल लिए थी हम दर पर धान्झनों कर चरे शानजें दे 나ये reasoning सकनसै को मरखरी लानजें कर है।।।।।।।।।।।।।।।।।।।। उसिनिरस कΕछ आesis॥।।।।।।।।।।।।।।।।। PVA औसे रहशึWeston याम also very good, शिज़न also very good. I'll repeat it. Okay. शो. Got it. Got it. Why? See guys, beautiful. शो. Leaderboard. It's hit with the same amount of energy and momentum. Beautiful, beautiful, beautiful. And if you remember, we were discussing the vertical drops. रागाव is our dear friend PewDiePie. We can ignore him as of now. रागाव is leading the scenario. रागाव is trying that I'm bringing two places in the leaderboard. So just kick me. रागाव. Thank you. Okay. Thank you. But yeah, I guess. रागाव. So that's not kick. So that will just get rid of the name. रागाव. Okay. So don't participate. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you. Just don't participate. They will go back down. रागाव. Next question is on your screen, guys. Go. Just remember the scenarios. The range of a projectile for a given initial velocity is maximum when the angle of projection is 45. A good set of information. Then the range will be minimum if the angle of projection is now this is expecting a tsunami. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you very much. रागाव. Thank you very much. राग. Thank you very much. two people got it absolutely right it's absolutely beautiful exactly why because when you look at this you know that they are talking about the range minimum range means a failed launch right exactly what happens for that the angle should be 90 degree clear clear clear clear clear because the angle is measured with respect to horizontal clear clear clear clear anyone having a doubt still send me an X yes sir me okay sir the range will be negative no because range is not a displacement range is a horizontal distance distance is not a distance velocity so it is given initial velocity initial speed then it would have been relax relax horizontal distance clear so that is why I marked 180 because it will be negative then no range is a horizontal distance if you remember I will just give you an example okay somewhere in the time back we discussed about a case that from a cannon multiple rounds are being fired in all the directions what is the maximum area the cannon can cover right no problem no problem no problem learning output yes the formula conceptual wise can you say that it is given initial velocity it should be initial speed then rate yes sir because velocity vector and we cannot lose the vector unless we good beautiful now you are stating it very beautifully you are saying that sir range is an outcome of a vector yes or no yes sir what are u cos theta and u sin theta over here what are u cos theta and u sin theta over here sir the horizontal distance and the vertical distance yeah horizontal and vertical components of the velocity clear clear clear clear clear no even if even if you consider velocity a vector this is a dot product here oh yeah also got it it has converted into a scalar r is a horizontal name of r is a horizontal distance got it sir u cos theta and u sin theta is a dot product sir but they are the components they are the components you received them if you remember if you remember i got it exactly no problem yeah excellent sir i got it right but like you did not got it ok it's ok 90 degrees i marked it ok good good good ok let's look at the leader board raghav ishika shrijan artha taking a good jump here we go to our next question the angle of projection at which now it will need a calculation relax calculate and respond it will need a calculation angle of projection at which the horizontal range and maximum height of the projectile r equal is clear so you have the expression for both you have the expression for r you have the expression for h you know what variations sin theta cos theta their ratio cos clear that is leading you to the answer i have just incidented some light in the path of the good good good good good good last 15 second 46 people have calculated and responded very very good shrijan no problem sir before even looking at how many people stated it correct or incorrect let's look here carefully ok what is the line saying horizontal range and maximum height r equal h and r are equal what is r and h r is 2 u cos theta into u sin theta by g what is h u square sin square theta by g got it u u u square 1 time sin g and g sin theta is equal to 2 into 2 4 cos theta sending it here tan theta is equal to 4 g i got it got it got it only those who want to send them x please yes then very good relax aditya very good shivam very good anish very good relax very good very good very good shiram is saying sir i actually did the same thing where you got where you lost your concentration no problem no problem again the same thing which is given that horizontal range and maximum height are equal ok we have the information about how the horizontal range looks like we have the information from how the maximum height looks like just put them equal normal mathematics ok same i will repeat and u is u square mathematically got cancelled clear 1 sin theta out of the 2 sin theta is available got cancelled gravitational acceleration and gravitation acceleration got cancelled what all remained 2 here which further got sent over here 2 into 2 is 4 cos theta was here which got sent over here cos theta by our knowledge we know sin theta by cos theta is tan theta got it still a x please good very good very good very good very good very good very good very good that's why i have given you the cheat sheet ok cheat sheet is very important let's oh oh oh 10 15 21 and 20 we got charlie only correct right yeah exactly good good good good let's look at the leaderboard good tanmi very good raghav sriram sunshine ok arthar ok heart strong was the fastest one to respond very good very good here we go to the next one at the top of the trajectory of a projectile the direction of its velocity and acceleration are now this is a beautiful which can lead to a good tsunami of responses but it's ok if you think about it to draw it and then respond right guys again think draw it where is the acceleration acting on a projectile there was a question sometime back 3 or 4 questions back right hmm so i'm sure i get it because i calculated it ok sriram very good like she has guessed it very good no problem very good last 20 seconds remaining and still we haven't seen that every one has responded everyone has voted very good very good very good 66 people on screen today good 31 15 13 7 good relax and let's see you know that a projectile as our initial conversation flies like this the only acceleration which is acting on the projectile is the acceleration due to gravity right at the maximum height there exist only one velocity which is u cos theta angle between the acceleration and the velocity is 90 degree if you have a doubt please send an X good Anish yes what happened very good sriram you confused me a bit no problem Anish you can unmute and talk trajectory is a English word path followed very good Prateek i'll repeat Anish no problem so when a projectile moves its movement looks like this yes or no at every point there is only one and only one force acting the gravitational force clear clear this gravitational force is acting downward the object is moving like this at the maximum height there is only one velocity with the object which is at the maximum height there is only one velocity with the object which is which is the horizontal the angle between horizontal velocity and acceleration due to gravity is 90 degree got it very good relax here we look at the leader board so sriram is leading the scene very good and here we go not leading the scene sriram was the fastest one raga was leading the scene here we go to the next question did i miss the question yes i did relax i did miss to upload people are already answering i don't see question can you show the question in photos or something no i'll re-upload it what is the problem so all you could tell the correct answer no so the people who have answered it have to answer it again have this in the question i am just saying a bunch of people randomly answered for that what i will do is i will change the options so we are running out of time relax we can let the question get concluded have you concluded no sir so should we not answer so what should we answer relax time is up for the question no sir time is up time is up sir time is not up yet time is up no not yet time is up but it's just not going stuck at the screen sir could you are you sharing screen no not yet relax sir it's stuck yeah relax relax sir my internet went for a moment was the question given no ready for the question get ready for the question need to start the time so for me the order of the options is like yes i have changed it so that you should not be able to guess if you by mistake i have done that no sir like it's saying the first one is be in the second one i have done it i am screen sharing now sir the numbers are weird like sir the numbers are weird like i have i told you i am changing the position of the options the question is same i have just changed the position of the options so those who kind of remember that oh for the last question the correct option was charlie delta or all that we will have to in some time and get the answer that's it sir i got the answer but then i wrote the correct i wrote the wrong option good i mean no no i am saying like got it you got the answer as a for example but instead of when marking a you actually marked b right yeah good that's a good test of like if you know i wanted to tell you like in 10th grade when i started doing this menti i never used to give a b c b as write sequence i always used to jumble them so that along with your knowledge it is also checking your attentiveness and 29 people got it right answering data this is the question let's look at it an object is thrown along a direction inclined at an angle 45 degree with the horizontal direction okay the horizontal range of the particle is equal to height height height height so we have to actually calculate how much is n multiplied with i yes sir let's write it down let's write it down clear the best way of writing it down is to calculate the ratio so at 45 degree the range will be equal to 2 u sine 45 cosine 45 will be again okay 1 by divided by clear which is u square by g very now comes the maximum height tell me how the maximum height will look like you will be like u square right sine square theta sine 45 is 1 by root 2 square of it is 2 by 2 g yes or no yes or no clear now r by h will be equal to r by h will be equal to u square u square g g 1 by 1 by 4 yes or no yes or no yes if you have if you have a doubt send x very good aditya very good very good varath very good if i will eliminate everything and ask you when an object is thrown at 45 degree what are the ranges and horizon like height can you calculate that yes you can you will say okay sir range is 2 times u cos 45 degree into u sin 45 degree by g no doubt good if i will ask you what is maximum height you will be like h is equal to u square sin square 45 by 2 g clear which is coming out as u square by 4 g clear which is coming out as u square by g got it so now you will write okay range upon height is equal to u square g g 1 by 1 by 4 so range is 4 times the height okay got number very good okay got it varath very good very good no problem sir i didn't get the last part where you said 1 by 1 by 4 good so see from here post calculation what is written in front of h 1 by 4 yes or no yes sir what is written in front of r1 denominator of the denominator is the numerator right okay good guys good good good very good tanya that's really helpful for health here we go to the leader board tanya will be like i will kill this man that's Tom very good and you are the fastest one to respond raga was still leading the scenarios here we go to the next question now your favourites just i was aware that at last you guys will be looking for some refreshment and for that say there are questions in front of you and this will need a tsunami of responses at last some hope or she is like oh good good good very good very good sir adityanand no problem bache this was too simple okay thank you let it be just a single simple right why to make it too simple at the very last second i lost all respect in your heart if at all there was in like just was saying let it be a single single like the very last moment everything was just shattered there are 9 more questions bache i will just request you siddharth can you like skip the dinner today 47 sir are there 10 questions 10 questions another 9 okay sir is kidding guys too the value of the unit vector so for any given vector the unit vector is given by the vector divided by its own something called as direction everyone y or n hey bacha please no wise ya this is not direction this is magnitude this is magnitude sir what is the vector 5 i minus 12 j divided by its own magnitude how you calculate the magnitude magnitude of the vector will be equal to square root of plus 144 yes sir this is equal to square root of 169 what is the square root of 169 i have to go to my 8th grade back someone please help me out okay sir 13 okay and that's the beautiful answer got it good good good good here we go so i think there are only 10 questions it said only 10 questions and t is like ya there are 10 sir heart storm is there and someone named as g a n is there is it gyanesh sir i think it's gandhar gandhar okay here we go to the next question is that possible if it is then option A yes result of tazin result in tazin so why are you giving clues how can i is result in 2 стан yes when the two vectors are same in magnitude and in direction very good no it cannot happen yes when the two vectors are same in magnitude but opposite in direction okay here i stated the word direction there the word is sense hence wins direction yes when the two vectors are same in magnitude making an angle of 2 pi by 3 2 pi by 3 is a beautiful thing you know sir you are kind of giving away stuff no i am not at all cant you see my cruelty in the first 7 questions good so last 10 seconds over there 60 people have responded 8 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 11 5 43 4 now i have to increase the standard of is the prize raghav heart storm shrijan namrata and here is shapa sir like you tell me the last 4 questions i answered right and i am in the same position it happens when the lives is easy the competition gets you will not be paid off equally for your efforts understand that life should not be easy you will stuck at the same place so yes here two vectors will resolve out to be 0 provided they are same in magnitude and opposite in direction here we go to the air the last question of the scenario but after this question there will not be any change in the leader board okay r moves for half of its time at 80 km per hour and for the rest half of time at 40 km per hour total distance covered is 60 km what is the average speed of the car 60 km per hour dum dum i want to announce a random prize who will come as fifth will get a chocolate from me who will come who will come fifth will get a chocolate the prize is you should come fifth sir there is a first five so there is nothing forgetting all the questions like well you have to like see you will have to manage your position no sir the first five will then work at home accuracy hmm i was fifth last last question okay just reading the name of my beautiful friend Srijan i announced this prize like there is enough okay okay okay google the word called as samant vad that's your assignment for today what is the meaning of the word samant vad exactly samant vad 35 35 12 9 1 yes 35 people got it absolutely it's feudism not feudism so a car moves for half of its time at 80 km per hour right as soon as a question comes like this there clicks three things in your mind blinking of three thoughts one this is a case of average velocity which can be calculated actually by the direct application of the formula total displacement covered upon total time ticket or there are two exclusive cases as well case of equal distances for which we have two v1 v2 upon v1 plus v2 and case two case of equal times which is here which is v1 plus v2 whole by two answer will be 80 plus 40 whole by two i know that 80 plus 40 happens to be 120 i know counting dividing by two is also good got feed it to me right or not and that is 60 km per hour a beautiful answer for the last question at 8.59 here is the leaderboard at least the timing is a mic drop event for me i never had thought this will happen at 9 raghav is the winner clap for this beautiful chap sir give shri ram the chocolate now shri ram second part second part shri ram shri ram my dear friends shri jen is not even actually i want to change the announcement can i make it third not fair sir once you saw in the world yes sir because he was good good guy actually i think it is a good idea to give the chocolate to everyone very good very good i am waiting for that kind of scenario guys i can meet and give chocolate to everyone thank you for your time guys thank you very much have a good night i hope you had a learning experience just grade it between learning nothing else know the gardening today only the learning outcome from 1 to 5 that will be really helpful you can be very crude and blunt while responding that no need to be biased about the entertainment you have very good aditya good sorry sir i thought it is 1 the highest 1 to 5 good good good thank you sir thanks a lot guys so it was entertaining thank you sir bye thank you guys bye bye thank you sir bye sir bye sir bye thank you sir thank you sir amazing quiz thank you thank you


Oh look, it's the Roblox guy. Yo, what is up my yeeters? Welcome back to another video. And today we are back with some more scary Peppa Pig videos. I thought we were gonna have enough of these because I couldn't find anymore, but luckily Mr. Lungwuf did just upload a new video and I did miss a couple of his other ones. So we're gonna be on his channel today. Shout out to Lungwuf for the awesome scary animations that he makes for us to react to. So we will be watching some short Peppa Pig horror animations. And the first one is Evil Pig's Resurrection part 7. So let's go ahead and press play. Oh, Evil Pig's Resurrection 7. Oh man, we're in for a treat.   Right here. Oh, alright then. I'll tell you what, only one of us is gonna make it out of here alive. Oh man, it's a showdown. I have a surprise. Oh no, run. Yo, she just pulled out a knife, GTA style. Oh, throwing knife. Call of duty style. Oh my god, she's missing it. Oh, hey, that's a good aim, man.  Oh, she just got smacked. What the heck? Follow me. Oh, it's the rabbit. It's Rebecca Rabbit, I believe. Oh my god, there's been a massacre here. Wait, where did the girl go? What? Was she a ghost?  What do I do? You run, that's exactly what you do, girl. Get out of there before it's too late. Hey, something's music though. I'm not even bothered to do some parkour or something.  Oh, she made it back home. There's gotta be more clues in the shed. Why is this happening? How do I stop her? I think I know a way. Oh, she just popped out of nowhere. Oh yeah, the bunny girl. Why should I trust you? Because me and your evil daughter were friends. To be continued, what? So it seems like the rabbit girl, Rebecca Rabbit used to be friends with Piggy before she turned evil. So let's see how it goes. Oh, so this is continuing off. Alright, what do you mean you were friends with her? She would sneak out of the house and play with me. Alright, so they used to be good friends from what it seems like. That's impossible, the side of the door has been nailed shut for years. She would find ways to get out. Oh yeah, so because remember Peppa was locked as a child in the cellar? What do you mean? Every time when you guys go out, she would sneak out with me to play. But how did you two meet? Not answering that. Okay, that's strange. How did she die? Oh, she's not dead. But how did she teleport and everything? I'm not sure. So Peppa's not dead, she's still alive? What a hideous creature. Hello old friend, oh no.  Oh my gosh. Alright, oh there goes Mommy Pig. Poor Mommy Pig, she's just being chased down this entire episode. Peppa does have some teleporting powers or some sort.  Your attempts will all fail. Oh my gosh, she looks demonic.  Everything you need to know is in your cellar. So long, losers. Oh no, she has to go back to the cellar. Yes, you got it. You got it, Mommy Pig. Then that is the end. So we will never know till she goes back down into the cellar. It figures out why Piggy's still upset at her and why she's chasing her down. So this next animation we're going to be watching is Piggy versus Siren Head. Oh, this is going to be a top 10 anime battles. What's up, Peppa? What you doing in the restroom, man? Oh, what? Saw her houses like in the middle of the forest, as you see? Okay. Oh, we can hear Siren Head in the background. She's like, heck nah, son, I'm out of here. Oh, Siren Head is closing in. Oh my God, there he is. Run, girl! Oh, man, she just snatched her. Oh, yay! Her face, oh my gosh. Oh, what is that?  She turned into Piggy. Peppa turned into Piggy. Oh, man, this is a battle. We've all wanted to see. She just got smacked all the way to the house. What? A bacon? A wild bacon has appeared.  Oh my God, part two coming soon. Dude, that was it. And for our final video, we're on the K. La Boy De Vera's channel and we're going to be watching Peppa Pig, watching terror television. I wonder what that's all about.  They do look quite terrified. Oh, they're watching the scary Peppa Pig video on the TV. Hey, that's them on the couch. They're watching themselves die. Oh, man. All right, I'm not too sure what's going on here. Oh, dude, I saw a gun. Dude, what's up with their faces, man? They look funny.  Hey, did you guys see that? I know you guys saw that, man. Yeah, I know you guys see that because the look on your faces is... Okay. Oh, man, what does that say, Leon Cola? Oh, not again. Oh, my God, Daddy Pig, what happened to you? Peppa, don't do it, Peppa. And there she goes. My God, what's up with all these guns? Peppa Pig keeps getting these guns out of nowhere. Some of these look kind of familiar. Oh, we got Georgie Pig and Peppa Pig. Poor George. He's just a child, at least a child alone. Uh, Lorca Cola. A Coca Cola. I don't know, that thing's weird. Okay, we got Rebecca Rabbit here. Oh, no. It's like they're at a tea party. 2,000 years later, what? 2,000 years later, they would have not been existing no more. Yo, can you blink? Rebecca, I don't feel very well. Uh-oh.  Oh, no, it poisoned me. Wait, what is she talking about? She got poisoned? How did she even get poisoned? Tell us. Why is she not spilling the beans? My God, you guys hear that voice? Sounds creepy. Oh, hello, the TV's black. We can't see anything. Okay. Oh, there you go. What is that? Oh, that's Roger the Alien. It was in the sky. As Daddy Pig. And Peppa just came out. Was that Mommy Pig? She has a sword. Okay. Oh. Okay, now what? Oh, there she goes. Put down that sword, man. That thing's bigger than you are.  Dude. Blink. Oh. What? A flamethrower.  Oh, man. What? What is she speaking? What is this language? It's like the gibberish at the minion speaker or something. Okay, wait. That was so random. So it was basically just Peppa Pig watching a horror movie on the TV. Which is a horror Peppa Pig movie playing. I would have been frightened too if I saw a movie of myself getting murdered. All right, you guys. Well, that is it for today. I will try to find more Peppa Pig videos. If you guys have any recommendations, comment, drop the link or comment them down below. I'll check them out as usual. And I will see you guys in the next one.


Is it out of here two years ago or three years ago? Really, or maybe even four? We passed it on here, it passed the floor unanimously, and then it died over there, over there. Okay, so, Jen? Yes. Would you like to join us? Sure. Jennifer Garvey, Legislative Council. So this is very similar to the version that some of you saw a few years ago. This is S297, an act relating to the Agency of Healthcare Administration. I've updated the findings a bit to have more recent numbers toward the end in looking at healthcare expenditures constituting over 25% of total state spending, second only to spending on K-12 education, updating some dates, things like that. So this goes through, and basically the overall idea is that it splits the Agency of Human Services into two agencies, an Agency of Healthcare Administration and an Agency of Human Services. And the Agency of Healthcare Administration would comprise the Department of Health Access, which is like the Department of Vermont Health Access, the Medicaid Agency, so it's the successor there, the Department of Mental Health and Substance Misuse, the Department of Long-Term Care, which pulls a piece out of Dale, the Department of Public Health, which is the successor to the Department of Health, the Healthcare Board, which is like the Human Services Board to hear appeals from decisions of the departments and the Vermont Health Benefit Exchange, Vermont Health Connect, where the exchange plants are that's currently in D-Va. And the way it's structured is very much, I mean, I took the Agency of Human Services statutes and kind of created a parallel version for the Agency of Healthcare Administration. So for the most part, it is just the same general thing creating a secretary, a deputy secretary, talking about the role of advisory committees, transferring personnel and appropriations as appropriate, moving a couple of the specific policy sections that are in the AHS chapter on the duty over healthcare reform, having a director of healthcare reform, moving that person from Agency of Human Services to Agency of Healthcare Administration, having the wholesale drug importation program, again, in the Agency of Healthcare Administration, not in the Agency of Human Services. So a lot of it is fairly standard, I think agency language, but in some cases, obviously tweak to fit the mission of this Agency of Healthcare Administration and talking about the different departments within it. What, where is the division of all the, like, Dale? So some of where that ends up, so there are a couple of provisions. There's some language in revisions to the AHS statutes that talk about what is left there, which I think we called the department. So on page 24 is what's left in the Agency of Human Services, which will be the Department of Corrections, the Department for Children and Families, this is section three. Sorry, what was? Section 24, page 24, section three. Section three. So what's left in the Agency of Human Services is the Department of Corrections, Department for Children and Families, the Department of Independent Living, which would take the disabilities and independent living concept from Dale. And it becomes a dill instead of a dail. Yes. And then the Human Services Board is still there for the appeals side on Human Services programs, but the rest of it moves over to the Agency of Healthcare Administration and in some cases gets some revised names. And then there is also a little bit of language toward the end about, where is this? About the healthcare, so in the very end of page 36, the Agency of Healthcare Administration is the successor to and the continuation of Department of Remind Health Access, Department of Mental Health, the Long-Term Care and Home and Community-Based Service Components of Dale, and the Department of Health. And so the Agency would continue the duties of those departments. There are some transitional provisions, I'm jumping around a little bit, but I think sometimes it's easier to understand the concepts than marks through the language. So on page 32 and a few pages thereafter, there is transitional language talking about transfer of positions, so directing the Secretary of Administration to create the new Secretary of Healthcare Administration position for October 1st, 2021, and then beginning October 1st, 2021, the Secretary of Administration would place under the supervision of that new secretary, all of the employees, professional and support staff, consultants and positions in all of the department's offices, divisions and offices to which the agency is the successor in interest and the balances of appropriation amounts for those up to 20 positions from the Agency of Human Services to staff the office of the Secretary of Healthcare Administration and the funds to go with that. It would require the Agency of Human Services to provide fiscal and administrative support for the Agency of Healthcare Administration until March 1st, 2022, and not later than January 1st, 2023, that the transfer would need to be complete. So there's sort of transitional provisions as you're moving people from one agency to the other, but that should be finished by January 1st, 2023, the people and the money. Where is, sorry, I just don't see 2023 anywhere. Page 33. Oh, page 30, I'm sorry, I was at 37, I thought we'd see it. Okay, no, we didn't get that right. So 30, we did, but then I moved that, yes. So subsections D and E are looking forward to January 1st, 2023 as the end of the reorganization and transition process. And then there would also be directive to the Secretary of Administration. This is now on page 34 to submit to the committees of jurisdiction, including this committee by December 1st, 2021, a proposal for dividing up Dale into a Department of Long-Term Care in one agency and Department of Independent Living in the other, and then talk specifically about the Department of Long-Term Care having the authority to administer the choices for care part of Vermont's Medicaid waiver and that the Department of, I'm sorry, and to regulate long-term care, regulate organizations providing home and community-based services and certify long-term care facilities on behalf of CMS, which is Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which is something Dale does now. And then the Department of Independent Living would provide services to Vermonters who are elders and to individuals with disabilities to allow them to remain in their homes, including voc rehab services, vocational rehab services. And then another proposal by the same date, December 1st, 2021, again to various committees, including this one with any additional modifications to the Department's units and divisions that were transferred from the Agency of Human Services to the new agency as needed to reflect the new departments of health access, of mental health and substance misuse and of public health. It's basically that they're directed to my office on page 36 to fix the statutes over the summer as would be needed to reflect the references to Agency of Human Services and Agency of Healthcare Administration as appropriate. And some transitional, some intent language on transitional funding, that it would be the intent of the General Assembly to provide in the Appropriations Act funding the Agency of Administration in fiscal year 2021 to be transferred to the Agency of Human Services for transition costs associated with reorganization. That is basically what's in it. So even though you talk a lot about transfer and transition, workers moving here and there, there's no real physical movement necessarily going on, right? I think there would have to be discussion about whether there was needed to be physical movement or not. I don't know what the capacity is or whether this would be adding, is maybe adding, I don't know if it would be adding new positions or not. So I think that would, some of that would depend on the reorganization. And then in that case, there may need to be physical moving to lump people who are working together into the same lump, isn't a good word, but to put them in the same space to allow them to work together as opposed to maybe spreading out two agencies across facilities. But I think there are other people who would have thoughts on that too. Right, I'll see what you're going to say. I don't know why, I don't want to say that because that way, there's all kinds of money here. Nolan is going to tell us how much money it means. And also, no, you're not. No, not today. But we all know that the person who is passionate about this is the person who controls it. So, but she has, this is like the fourth time she's tried to get, right? She's introduced this, she's introduced it several times. It has been introduced at least a few times before. I recall this is my second time, but I don't know, it may have been happened before that. Was that the first one? It's never passed the house. They never even took it up. I don't know, I think the issue has been around for a while. It may be only the second time it's been introduced. The second time it's been actually physically introduced. I think the concept has been around for a while. So we're going to hear from the sponsor about why we, what the objective is clearly. And thank you. And it's also, you know, I think laid out to some extent in the findings. Yes, I think the findings are terrific. I'm enjoying it here. Any more questions for Jen? Over there? Okay. No, but it's nice to have you with this committee. It's my first time here, I think. So she's going to go get it. Yes, March 11th. Yeah. Her, the secretary. Yeah. Yes. I'll work with Gail, but that should be absolutely fine. It's far enough. It feels like a lifetime right now. It's been a whole new month. Perfect. It is a whole new month. I know. Perfect. Yes, we're going to get to this too. Okay. Don't have to go get Jen. No, she just texted her. I mean, she just emailed her. Okay. Ooh, baby Canada. Everybody can vote it. Thank you. Okay, we should read the findings and be prepared for Jane. I'm channeling the house at the moment. And I believe that last time we did this, the only opposition came officially from some of the commissioners, but unofficially they actually supported it, but officially they couldn't support it because the then administration did not support it. Have you heard anything from the administration? Yes, Mike Smith is going to come in and testify on March 11th. Oh, right. That's what we just heard said. And at that point, we will also then, I guess here from the SCA, or today we might, we'll probably have time. Chair, if it would please the chair and committee, listen to today's testimony and brief our members in order to get a better understanding of their position on the issue that came in. And make it short. Yes, of course. I didn't tell you that Gail was going to give me that plaque, right? It says, I am not bossy, I am the boss. Oh, yeah. This is giving me all sorts of ideas for your birthday presents. Thank you. Jen has walked us through. Oh, she has. Oh my goodness. Word for word. Oh. We did an overview. She did an overview. And if you would like to just give us your understanding of why we feel this is necessary. Okay. Well, this isn't my first time with this issue. And I just want to start back a little bit because I have been around so long, I predate the agency of human services. I started in social welfare and there was no agency. So I have been there when it was created and I understand the world as it existed in the early seventies. And during that intervening period of time, our healthcare spending, our agenda and the role that the state is playing has grown enormously. So healthcare is now our second largest area of spending in state government after K through 12. And we have a very ambitious agenda as it relates to how we want to finance care, how we are moving through. We have another waiver to negotiate. And my reason for proposing a healthcare administrative entity that is focused on the administration and the management of our healthcare policies, resources is accountability. And the agency of human services is half of state government. And everybody will say, well, it's, you know, you can't take that as all connected. And if you carry that argument out, you should manage everything out of the governor's office because everything is connected to everything else. And if there are areas where people talk about the need being the greatest, it's housing, transportation and jobs. So you have to look at how systems need to understand and work across systems, but you also have to have organizational entities that are of a size and scope and complexity that you can hold someone accountable for administering. And right now to ask one administrator to be responsible and the agency of human services is an umbrella agency. So the secretary's office is really rolled to bring together all those various functions and make sure the policies align, that there's oversight, that the financing and everything comes together in the best possible way. So back in the early 1970s, we of course still had institutions and you had state hospital with, when I first started was like 1300 patients, you had Brandon. So you had a very different kind of environment in terms of how people were being served, what those relationships were. So the fundamental question I would say, would we expect the CEO of Blue Cross Blue Shield to run prisons, collect child support, protect children and the list goes on and on. And I think we would say that is a scope of such diverse area that it is very difficult if impossible. Now I know that I'm seeing this from a different perspective because I've maintained my involvement. If I had not been involved when I left in 2002, I would be seeing the agency as I knew it. But sitting next door, I see how that healthcare agenda has evolved and how it's expanded and the enormous fiscal and policy implications that are there. So if you don't have that continuous kind of understanding and what the challenges are, it's easy to say, well, that's the way it was or that made sense. In 1973, healthcare was essentially Medicaid, plus your institutions, as I was talking about. And Medicaid was limited to people who were on public assistance or in a nursing home. Pretty simple. I mean, we said the director could manage the program out of his bottom drawer. Those days are long gone, but our organizational design is still the same. And yet you look at the other part of the system, which is under tremendous pressure and need for attention and leadership. And that is look at what we wanna do in corrections. Justice reinvestment as we're moving people into the community, how we provide those housing supports, how we transform that system, major agenda. I think corrections does fit very much with our other casework and our social work functions because families are attached generally to the inmates or individuals on probation. Some, in fact, are mothers. Children could be in the child welfare system. Our child welfare system is under tremendous pressure. No question about it. We're trying to understand why we bring more children into state custody by far than other states around us. How we can look at that system, what is driving it, because that's a major area where we put more money. But let me tell you, if we're concerned about trauma, anyone ending up in child welfare system, it's tremendous, tremendous trauma to the kids and to families. The other part, as you're looking is there's an agenda looking at in general assistance on housing and emergency housing, moving away from vouchers, how you do that, how you work with communities, tremendous amount of work associated with all of that. So I was, my thinking is that we need to look at what should be the right functional alignment of responsibilities and programs and activities of government and how to create organizational entities that are manageable and we should expect an administrator to be able to oversee and to pay attention to this myriad of things, whether it's on the healthcare side and anybody who's on health and welfare in the morning knows the work that's attached, there's the waiver that's gotta be renegotiated, the development of the ACO, how that is being rolled out, the connection with other parts of the delivery system, it's payment reform, it's the complexity and the financial stakes are enormous there. And then the connections back, and I talked to Secretary Mike Smith and I had talked with him the first time we were considering this legislation, which the Senate passed unanimously. And he said his thinking had evolved because he's been working in vital, he's been looking at all these pieces that are really important to the administration of our healthcare and eventually hopefully providing better care and looking at costs and how technology and data help do that. So he's not able to come in today but he is able to provide that perspective because after he's left, he's actually also had connections with other parts of the delivery system as well as Medicaid and understands the huge stakes that are involved in the renegotiation of our waiver. And you don't know but the waiver allows us to pay for services that Medicaid would not normally pay and we have over a hundred million dollars of those services. So that's why I'm just using an example of how high the fiscal impacts are. So if you look at all the different areas that really policy committees are saying needs a lot of work and a lot of attention to put together, it doesn't mean that you disconnect everything. I want to understand that. Our problem is we talk about siloed funding and we do have siloed funding but what bothers me more is our siloed thinking that happens too frequently and people not being able to see those connecting points with other systems and working across those systems because education is a separate system. Economic development, job creation, transportation and yet those are critical components in terms of improving lots of remoders. So siloed thinking allows you to feel very comfortable with what you have. Another area that I have been harping on for a long time and that is we have case management. Everybody's a case manager. They case manage their bundle of services. They're not, it's not like healthcare where you have a medical home where that primary care practice is responsible for your overall healthcare. You may need to see a specialist or several specialists but you have a medical home. Right now we have, as I say, we have systems where we have everybody involved and nobody accountable and everybody's doing their part perfectly, they think and yet you're not moving forward. So I would love to get us at some point when we're looking at the social services side, the case work, the case management side where we have a system where you have just like a medical home, a case work home because a lot of times you find families are served by four or five different entities but who has overall responsibility. So there are many, many systems issues that have gone on, unaddressed over time. And I just, I feel that some of it is there's only so many hours in the day. There's so much mental energy you've got in terms of what you can look at at any one time and what you can be, anyone can really realistically expect any person to be able to understand. And so that's why I feel that this is a way of better accountability. I'm not doing this because I think it saves money. It might, but it's not. It's making sure that we have an organizational construct that is realistically within a manageable scope. So that's kind of it in a nutshell. So Jane, why do you, I hear you on all of this but I'm just curious how you think this is going to improve accountability? Just because it will be smaller or the, I mean, I'm just curious how you think this is going to improve accountability? Because it will allow us a more focused managerial attention on all our healthcare policies, spending and those how, and the transformation of our delivery system. And do we not ask for that now? I mean, we ask for a lot of that now. But for a secretary to be managing that process, which includes how vital it's functioning, remember that was no luck good for a long time. We're very unhappy with the spending that was there and so forth. It's how do you, how does one person have the time to deal with corrections on top of that healthcare agenda? We have a very ambitious, if we do it, the justice reinvestment. There's a lot of work that needs to be done in corrections. We know that that system is really under great pressure. We can't hire the staff. We've got a whole lot of cultural and policy needs that have been identified and need to be addressed. We need to look at our child welfare system. We need to look at how, what we're funding, how we're funding, how we're holding the providers accountable, how we're serving families. Those are all great examples, but they're very, they take a lot of time. And so you've got people with different perspectives in terms of how you wanna solve that problem. You listen to one group and this answer for child welfare is one thing versus another. An example was, to be honest, the issue around the rate of children coming into custody was one that we, I picked up in appropriations. It didn't come from the administration. Didn't come from DC. No, it didn't. It came from, and that was why we put money in the budget last year for 200,000 to work with UVM, school of social work, nursing. And then we have the Children's Health Improvement Project to take a look at what is happening. Why are children coming in? Are we funding the right services? Are we intervening in the right way? Are we using interventions that might have worked 20 years ago, but don't? And people will say, well, it's the opioid crisis. Well, every state's got opioid crisis. We're some, many worse than Vermont. Poverty, well, we have poverty, but we don't have the deep depths of poverty that some other states have. So the question is, what are those factors? How do we shape the policies? How do we look at what we're doing? Those are all very massive pieces of work that need administrative time. And it's easy for me to say, gee, this is a real problem. Let's take a study and look at it, but then someone has got to be able to act on it and say, how do we change what we're doing? The same thing is true. Senator White will know this when you talk about justice reinvestment. What that's gonna mean to the whole correction system, both institutional and on the community side. So these are times when our old legacy systems are having to be re-looked at. And some of our practices need to be challenged. Some of what we're funding probably needs to be maybe used in different ways. But when you put it all together, it is the needs of today and shedding and moving out of these kind of legacy compartmentalization really are gonna require some time and some leadership and some vision. And so I'm just trying to give a scope of responsibility where it's realistic for a person to be able to succeed or just say, oh my God, that's so big, no wonder they didn't get to that. Or whatever, so we're kind of reacting. So it's with how many years of perspective? 53 years, starting in 1967 that I am looking at this and saying the construct that we put in place in the early 70s is not serving us well with the demands and the complexities of today. So that is my story and I'm sticking to it. So, does that help? Yeah, it does help. And I have supported this measure and I have loved and appreciated all the things that have been done currently sort of in and around the edges of making it work and streamlining services. So for example, from a user point of view, when we, they now have a sort of a navigator in each county who, in our county, it's Sue Graff, but Wazzling Boyle who you could call about any of the connected AHS things and you wouldn't have to call each area but they could intervene in all areas and when you're dealing with constituents we have whose lives touch every one of those. And there are times, I have to say, It's very helpful. And I will say that there are times when in fact, I feel like I'm the case manager for a lot of the people in my area when they call and I'm saying that isn't right or I'll help you with that. Or why didn't you get referred for this?   And, you know, I, so I understand it. There's a lot of information there to absorb and I understand those regional coordinators. They're great. Well they are. I was there when we put them in place and we actually gave them some flexible money which we've been taking away bit by bit, which bothers me. So that was an effort at the community level to look at, you know, and if we're gonna move together with that housing initiative to get away from motels that those are the kind of positions that are gonna have to lead that. They're gonna have to bring together the agencies or so to me that that is at the community level trying to make sure that all the people that have got to come together in fact do or to get the community engagement that's necessary. But it takes a lot of time and it takes being able to move beyond what my program is or what my department does. Have other states, I assume other states have, Yeah, they're all over the map. They're all over the map. But I, you know, we change our committees here within the building. We have, you know, sort of every five or six years we have no needs with our committees. We change them around hopefully to address things more effectively. It makes sense to do some of this.  That's not us. No, it's cannabis. Oh, it's cannabis. Cannabis are us. It will be coming towards us. Oh, I know, I know. I know. So you can slice and dice this a variety of ways but what I am trying to recognize is the way in which we organize functions in the neatest way. There'll never be any clean, you know what I mean. People still have to work across systems and so forth. But I am trying to make sure that these key systems get the administrative leadership and attention that is warranted to deal with very, very complex and very substantial areas of really service and delivery transformation. So that's my motivation for doing it. And I'm sorry, Secretary Smith couldn't come in. I'm sure you'll be having a little bit of time soon. You'll be coming in soon. Yeah, anything, come in. We're doing it next Wednesday. I mean, the Wednesday will come back. We're hoping that we'll just be able to vote it out at that point once we hear from the secretary. Yeah, and I really struggled, you know, in terms of, I wouldn't be proposing it if I were totally fossilized. I would be saying, oh, everything is perfect. Let's keep it the way it is. We just need to sit around and talk better. And I know some of the reasons where different programs or services ended up and it has nothing to do with a rational alignment. It had to do with personalities. It had to do with what people didn't or did like. So some of what we have has absolutely no organizational basis for it. It's sort of like, you know, let's jettison that or how do we, you know, make something work? So it's a good time to take a look at functions and accountability and what is reasonable for one person to really move forward on. Thanks for not bringing up. Yeah, thank you. I know, I can't believe I'm that old. No, that's not the implication of that. That's the year I got married. 1967? I did too. My God, we're still married. I thought we must be the most boring people in the world. We are, but we remember that we were both promised at birth. We were child brides. We're not that old. Oh, all right. I'm not that old. We're not that old. I'm not that old. You're not experienced. And you know, I have to say, I feel really, I have been in state government and I can look back and I really feel a sense of pride. Reach Up, which is a model program, when I put that forward to replace the old income maintenance, that was a tough sell. It was a tough sell here. I was accused of leading an economic assault on the most economically oppressed women in the state. And now people look back and say, it's human capital development. It's a two-generation approach. Yes, because it came with a work expectation for parents. Dr.  The 211 system, I worked with Gretchen Morris to get the 211 system up, which was really when you think about it with, you know, and so I feel very fortunate that I've been able to institutional impact Jane Kitchell. Well, but I also feel like Jane wasn't unlucky to be at the right place at the right time and be able to do this, so. And now you think how much more we still have to do, too. Well, that's right. I know. You know, we can't be complacent, Allison, we have to. I know. But I also, and I was involved, you know, with the first effort on healthcare reform with Governor Dean, when that fell apart, then we picked it up. We did the Vermont Health Access Plan VHAP, which was the first effort to really get away from the categorical eligibility for Medicaid and help low-income workers. So a lot of things have happened over that period of time. It was no food stamp program when I first started and the overseers of the poor were still in place. So that gives you some historical context of. And fence sitters were still there. Yeah, well, fence, I'm still there. It's fence viewers who are still there. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I don't, I didn't have anything to do with them. You know, we should probably do this in more, more than just this agency. I mean, if we were going to start right now to create a state government, we probably would not create it the way it is right now. Probably not. In a lot of areas. So actually maybe this might inspire us to call for a review of the effective design of state government. No, you take on too much and it becomes, well, we can do it, agency by agency. We're great incrementalists. We succeed when we're doing somewhat, at least to some extent now some people would like the, we've tried the big bang and sometimes it doesn't work, but then we pick it up and move forward and don't give up. So anyway, that's sort of the view over the last few years. And I'm sure Jen gave you a much more. And basically I just, we work from the bill that you passed with the changes that you made from when it was introduced. So it wasn't an attempt to kind of redo that territory. Right, it started with what was passed out of the Senate. Yes, yeah. And reflects the work that this committee did several years ago. But I do have the report. I do have the report on the welfare reform foundation for change. I have quite a bit of stuff. It doesn't have those already, the archivists. Well, she probably does, but June has to do it. I have my own file. I have my own file. I have an article by Jerry Anderson. Remember he came up and testified, healthcare reform oversight on the cost of obesity to the healthcare system. He testified back in 2002. So I have, it's amazing when I go back and look at some of the stuff I've got. We have similar reports on law enforcement here dating back to 1960. I bet you do. Yeah, I bet you do. So thank you, Senator. Thank you. Well, long. Just checking in to see what's going on. All right. All right. We don't have anything else on our agenda today, I don't think. Do we? No. And you don't have to tell us how much it's gonna cost. If I knew. If I knew, I would tell you. Okay. Well, and we really don't know, do we? Because. No, I don't think it's known. I think what you would do is you'd put in some kind of mechanism for a budget adjustment, maybe. Or we could talk about it with you before, but I don't know that there is no cost. Stephanie may have worked on it on one of the other three considerations. Yeah, I think. I'll check with her. Yeah, I can do it because I think there was some stuff around that. Yeah, if we put in, some of the language we put in around sort of continuing the operations, I think we can't move forward. Yeah. I'll tell you what I'm gonna do. Okay. All right. Ready? All right. Okay.


Okay, it's not really funny, it's just because I don't think I'm very decent. So, okay, my daughter's can I at least write it myself? Or actually, it's my journey in the writing CSS in the JS. So, sure, can anyone who's actually writing day-to-day CSS in JS already There's quite a few, but there's about 10. So, we share so much, I have this friend, I think in April she was at this conference, there was like a tech conference, and then this person came up and her first teacher was about how to start with and not use friends. Then once she said, my way of doing it is CSS in JS, and then how to move left. So, I'm not that... This is my Twitter handler, and if you're interested in dead jokes, I retweet a lot of dead jokes. This is from my first job. So, I realized that all CSS in JS are always beginning with. It's not that I don't like CSS. I think it's I like CSS, and my first job was in a advertising agency, so I did a lot of CSS work. And then, yeah, it's not that I don't like CSS, I really like it a lot, but I realized that you can do something else. Okay, so, I think a lot of us went through this process when we were doing CSS styling. So, all the way from the start, we started with UI stuff, before we had the CSS form. And then we went to CSS, we looked at CSS in the garden, because this new enlightened way of writing CSS, that cascades. And then under that, we went to pre-processing. Yeah, so we used CSS, we used less. And then we also moved on to more of, like, structure. There was CSS, there wasn't any CSS. And I think a lot of it is that we wanted to try to manage CSS at scale. And I think this is one of the parts that I was playing out a lot when you were talking about scaling CSS. This is, he's considered, I'm going to say, a B, J, U, X, Christopher. I'm going to say Christopher, something. So, he works at Facebook, and then he shared this session in 2014, talking about how it's actually very difficult to use CSS at a standard scale. So, he found out some of the problems. One is that CSS is always a global space. Like, even if you use, include, like, you depend a lot on it, it's actually added in as a global scale. So, you might have a lot of problems where file A requires file B, so it goes file B, and then file C also requires file B, but then it didn't look file, it didn't look file B, but somehow it still works, because A already wrote it before. And then finally, when you just pick up A, you realize that C doesn't work anymore, because it doesn't, it depends a lot on it, but it's not loaded. So, that is, like, when you're looking on JavaScript, we are very clear whether something is included, but then CSS is a bit weird. And then, and then the most part is the big quote, big quote elimination. Like, when you want to remove CSS, each refactoring is very painful. Like, at first there was this component, there was being a, maybe it's for button, and then after a while, this button's not used. It was removed from all your DOM, but then you, I'm not that comfortable removing that in CSS, because you have to, like, get through everything, and then in CA, is this used before, is this used in other class. So, you feel a lot of pain when you're trying to, like, clean up your code, try to refactoring CSS. So, yeah, this is the one that I think a lot of us end up doing, which is B, E, N. It uses the syntax of block, element, modifier. You can carry that kind. Yeah, all the talks today, like, we used to work there. Nice. This is a song, by the way. You don't have slides when you code that, okay? Nice. What do you mean, you didn't do this, okay? No, I hope not to get one. Just did you have a date? No, I'm not sure. If anyone can find that, I'll use it. I think you should do it in the other side. If you take those. Okay, so this is how you write using VM. So there's, let's say, this base block, it's a button class, and then from a modifier, you actually add a drive dash to mean that it's a modifier. So there's another button, and then there's the depressed button, which takes it across a button, and also a button depressed, which tries to modify some of the, the pattern from where you will get the modified version. Why would you try this? Yeah. So, yeah, working with VM, you are actually working with VM, so there's nothing that you can stop someone from using it that way. Or like, the person has like, crazy naming ways, like, you use that button, but the person loves ice creams, and then just call it dot ice creams, and then they're starting to stop you, and they're starting for someone to stop using VM also inside a project. So let's say if someone comes into a project and doesn't put a VM where you've been like, ah, you, this is not really good. So, we had to deal with CSS on scale, so we worked with VM a lot, and then that's when I started realizing that my code is very verbose, and it's very, very long. So I started to be at Atomic CSS, which is starting controversial, because when you write with Atomic CSS, they put stuff like this. Yeah, so you have like, 1000 class, each of them are designing one thing, actually. So like, DA I think is border or, DW is border-ree, so if you change it, you have 10 different things. So this is padding in the horizontal side, and this is padding in the vertical side. So for this, you realize one thing, your CSS file is super small, because there's no reverb. Like, border-ree, one is going to appear one type in the CSS file, it's going to have a super small CSS file, but then you're gone because it's very hard to read. And then, I realized, like, so I actually used this style to do two projects, two projects that are in production. You are even using it day-to-day, like, this is a phone brand that I was looking for. So, you went to production, it was okay. File size was much smaller. There was almost no big CSS code, because it's nothing that you are learning as custom. And then, like, people are working on a project, I was looking super fast, because I remember, like, padding polynomial, that's pH, and then it was a tempo of 1, 2, 3, 4, but then, if I stopped looking at the code for a while, I realized I need to keep looking at the documentation. Of course, there are people who will try to circumvent it. There are, actually, people who really, really like this library, and then they provide this for you. So, you just have to look at padding, and then you can see, what does each link. But this is still a lot of reference to the documentation. My favourite comment about this way of writing is, this is just a nice style. Like, you are just writing a nice style in another way, using class, so that your face will be beat. We work on another project, like, it's a coding, right, which is that I have to do a regular tool. So, I didn't know, I know nothing about regular tool style and encapsulation. I went into the project, and then I just came in, I wrote a style, and then I realized, oh my god, the style is stuck within my component.  Like, because what we do is a with each component, that is a hash of your CSS style, and then it's, it pans a class to itself. I don't know whether this makes sense, but it's very close to what actually the CSS model is trying to do. But then this is just, we got to work to just x, y, z, z, 1, 2, 3. So, following that, I was following a lot on CSS model because I realized that it solves a lot of problems of what DN was trying to do. So, DN goes to a convention, but CSS model will force you to write things that I wrote in your police code. You don't want to write any CSS that is global in scope. You can, you can do that, but then by default, everything is going to leave. So, that's when I move on to my next project, which is based on React, and then as any lazy person who works with React, will use create React app, because it sets so many default without you thinking about it. So, what is this? Yeah, so I use, I was like, I'm going to use create, create React app, and then I went in, I looked at an invitation, and it was this. We are not supporting CSS model. I was like, ah, just took away everything that thought was the best way of doing things. I was like, okay, I'm going to ask Facebook what's the best way of doing things. Since you know Facebook because you're quite smart. So, I went in, and then I checked out, okay, okay, React application, how do you do styles? And then they say, you should just set it in the, the document was, it actually writes in the dot style, dot font size, dot style dot, something. So, this is literally in line style. So, I think a good question is why do we not write in line style? I think, a lot of times we will say, we don't write in line styles. But then why? Why do we not write in line styles? The reason, the reason. You can't ever write them? Yeah. You can't write them. You can't use Sudo, any form of Sudo over before, after 10 minutes. You can't write any media queries. So, when you have no media queries, then you write in line. And, if somebody writes important in line, okay. That's enough for me. Okay, so, I looked at what create, create, create app, do you see? So, then I realized that what they are doing is import.app.css house. Like, this looks strange. It goes to the end of one. It's an encapsulate. Is it? Is it going to put in scope? And then I realized, it's just a web app import. So, at the end of the day, you just tap, tap, tap, tap, tap, tap, tap, or import into one. So, I'm back to square one. And then, I think a lot of us are very angry about using CSS and JS because we want to do hard, obtrusive JavaScript. Like, everything about writing styles is CSS. The first thing we think of is something like this. Like, okay, this thing, this title changes the size based on the screen size. And then, over here, I just add an event listener on the resize, like, each size of each one. And if you look at the DOM, it's super ugly. Too big. When we talk about, when we think about, like, CSS and JS, this is what we think about. We're like, ah, this is very ugly thing that we're trying to take straight into our style. And then, we try not to do that. So, I think it needs to come with a modern mind. Okay, so, I think I committed my journey to try to still use CSS in React. And this is still the same tool button, normal button, a depressed button. And then, I still want to use CSS because I don't want to delete from it. I realized that actually, if I just have one similar component to modify it, let's say, I'm passing the pop that will say depressed, I actually have to write something like this right inside my JSX to say that if there's a depressed, you need to put this class in. It's slightly ugly. I feel like, okay, it works, but not beautiful. So, that's why I was like, okay, it's kind of good with CSS and JS. So, there is a dismiss. So, the first thing when you search for CSS and JS, you will come to this place and then you'll be like, okay, let me try one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, and this is the exact way of doing a development. We just have to show that two things that are very, very similar but then need to be changed and then they will think about this one, this one, this one, and then they will think about this one, and then they will think about this one, I found this, which is pretty interesting. Okay, so this was a little bit like a promise CSS. It generates one line as one class. So, color rate is class B, it's green, it's class B. This is actually a bit less painful. So, you are still going to this path. You want to generate this really with your CSS file, but then you do not want to be referencing documentation and then you'll write your own one. You can actually use this one then. So, what do we have here? This. Yeah, so each becomes equal if you are one team, reference one line. So, it's almost like just now the promise CSS, but then this is something that you generate yourself. I think it's a good idea. I guess with this you have really really small CSS file. Thank you. Yeah, but it's the debugging is painful and probably nobody needs that. Okay, so, we have features for Spark Components. And I think this is a library that we talk about over the world then because one thing that really differentiates it is you are not writing JavaScript, but instead we are writing CSS straight here. So, if you use any form of syntax highlighting in more ways, highlighting property for you, we still go here. What it does is instead of writing the class name, what you do is actually which you say is a start button. So, and then you name it as let's say any name that you like I'll name it start button over there and then in case my element will start button and it will become a button with all this starting in. And if you check that if you check what's here with the check button, it generates one class and this class holds everything here. So, why is this? This is actually a hash of all this here. So, if you have the exact same thing you will actually generate the exact same class. So, for this there is a lot of excitement because you are writing real CSS which comes if you have slow and you have linear queries and the V2 of start element varies some of the time which means that you have some CSS using alignment. Yeah, there is team so you can actually write teams and then you can you can pass this team all the way down to all the way to your next third component you can still receive. But let's say that this team has a pink color that's the base color and every element in your in the project can receive this color and a new interesting addition is also attributes. It's sort of like an escape patch for a start element where you actually set attribute strip. So let's say it really let's say if you are using another library let's say you're using bootstrap and you're not using the end bootstrap you're using the base normal bootstrap you just include the CSS file so you need any other casting into your element so instead of adding um instead of adding let's say here so instead of saying let's say um then this is column A6 what the new start component allows you to do with the treatment object over here let's see here over here see this you can like this casting so it becomes like study option you can you can be you can be you can be you can actually start to add things that you need okay so I think there are some parts that comes with it that is not so direct which is I think one thing that I really enjoy is there's no more build process um of course you know okay I'll talk about the build yeah there's no build orders I don't need to set up a guard or workhead although most although the build has workhead it means that I mean the next thing is great but that is context switching when I move between JavaScript and writing next thing and this will mean I have only writing in JavaScript um it fits really really well if you have um if your workflow includes writing style libraries like this is a button you should use across all the pages and this actually works pretty well in this workflow and there's almost no work but I think there's some discussion one is performance because you are going to pass the JavaScript string because it's still a string and then you pass it to the CSS so there are people will ask you is it something like does it affect performance still are you like okay dividing this slightly harder because you can't point towards what it's causing but but the biggest problem with using style component is rapidly changing style okay so over here we have this there's a panel that move in move out how this is calculated is that it has a state and then it actually tries to change the the position of the state so the string and you realize that the problem is changing the problem is because like what we are talking about just now this is a hash of everything here and if something changes this whole problem changes and yeah for now the solution that has been discussed is to not use style component for that the thing is the ultimate suggestion is to realize that so yeah I think what I really like about style component is that this whole notion of falling to success like you don't have to follow conventions because conventions are updating and in order for something to work you must be writing like the best form of the code and yeah this is huge basically you are writing statuses for a partner and then you also have to somehow else also have to react so you might be like this that she knows there's something else we have to add but your react like this is going into the act so it's an awesome way to react it has to be designed housing it's like a work-around so it's designed at what you do where you can actually put in classes you can actually reference another file and you also can so try to import that file and then you reference that file so there's no way for you to write something in the style component and you wouldn't use that outside there's no way to get any if I mean there's still a stream so if you can export that stream and you want it somewhere else you can use that stream then you try to use props inside the stream and then somewhere else you can use that stream it's kind of like a fallback it's a prox about there and then you just you can it's a condition you can use that stream yeah you can and then you can import more props there you can export that yeah I have to export that it's a prox because it's just another way then you can use that stream and then it's also a stream okay so that's how I would import yeah so I just I just want to export this stream and then you can use whatever that might just be a little bit shorter then you can export thank you thank you so much thank you I've got like also so actually the styles can compile when the JavaScript can run instead yeah it's actually inserted in the heap when the tasks in JavaScript come up in here would it work if clients at JavaScript somehow fail I would still get a little bored then yeah you know if the man doesn't run so if you type in why do you sometimes have to get fired do you sometimes have to get fired or are you responsible and sometimes I don't know of them yeah people but you want to be magic you will be the others how is the one that you're looking for where else I'll put that on I'm just not very nice despite not being so if you find a style for the man then he's really comfortable if you just talk about that he has a really good component yeah but you you don't get you don't get state like you don't get state like you don't get state like you don't get state yeah if you don't get state it's actually a component and that is actually the thing around the element that you choose and each of them which is a component any other questions you can get any much any questions any questions I'm curious about the style size like the generated CSS is it any bigger than similar okay so you don't generate when you see this one it's always well when I say generated I mean my generated by-reactions it's like compiling your CSS in essence yeah so how's the file size all of the by-size of your CSS compared to if you're using any other method the key thing is it's always learning what your current file size is so you're never learning your old CSS at any one time so if you have many many components definitely learning the same from that component it might be very faster even small possible you're in a sphere so you're still sending all products to the client anyway so you're still sending them I'm just curious because normally when you have your CSS you have a monolithic CSS file it has everything in there yeah I'm curious if that's significantly different file size unless you've got your how's your file size quite just in time so if you need a way of learning you can click back and you can get to like all on your own even if it's not you're using React and I'm not using like CSS or anything like that so it's to be more traditional in essence so using React doesn't mean you can access it in a specific way I'm curious to know if there's a difference in the exercise if it says as if it says as how much do you believe in difference because CSS doesn't have any probability about the outside it can yeah unless your CSS really like in the lines it's like you believe in difference I mean really really good but I know she did for a test of the I did for it but a bit more responsibility in the learn the difference is usually a couple of hundred lines and then a date of bite size it's really not as if you're if you're optimising down to bites unless you really saw all the bigger forms like I'm not religious um yeah it's to me that's a different micro move but I mean as I said then sometimes you're tailed score a score of maybe I'm over 30,000 so I used to have a problem with I'm strong like user there's a problem yes and then another friend there's a problem and there's a problem yes I think there's a bigger problem in in the in the in the in the CSS CSS If you have questions from the audience, you're shy, you often go and ask a pretty good question. You just don't get chocolate. We can't make a video and he's going to talk about it.


I'm Mohamed Fareed, I'm a professor at the Chemical and Material Engineering Department at the University of Auckland. Pasteurization of food is really inactivating pathogens and produce a product which is safe but has to be refrigerated. Sterilization means inactivating all microorganisms, producing shelf-stable products which you can store outside the fridge. In the pulse-electric field you are applying very high electric field which damages the microorganism. It's used to pasteurize liquid pumpable food. It is based on very high-voltage pulses as you see as the fluid pass through the treatment and receive the electric shock, the microbial activity reduces dramatically. Well in high-pressure processing, extreme high-pressure is applied and that causes rupturing to the cellular wall of the microorganism. The food bowl works alongside research institutes such as University of Auckland to scale up and commercialize the research done in high-pressure processing. High-pressure processing means that food products must already be packed in their final packaging. Our unit is a multivac and is 55 litres per cycle. We're excited to work with researchers in food processing and product development and look forward to growing the food and beverage industry. Sterilization is needed because you want to create shelf-stable product. At the moment thermal sterilization happens either through in-con sterilization or through UHD. Thermal sterilization is great because it produces safe products but it degrades the food quality in the pressure-assisted sterilization. You operate at quite low temperature, 20 degrees up to 40 degrees where no damage happens. The benefit of non-thermal processing is retaining food quality, color, taste and vitamins. We build first a very small unit to test this principle of pressure-assisted sterilization. Then we design and build the unit in the laboratory and we are aiming now to take it further to commercial scale.


In this lesson, we are going to talk about how to get user input from the command line in Python programming language. For example, let's say that we want to get an input from the user and store it in X variable. In order to do that, we are going to call input function and if we want to print something to our user, we are going to put that text inside quotes. For example, I'll put text X equals to something and that will be an argument of our input function. Okay, let's call now our input function and result of getting some value from the command line will be stored to the value X. Okay, let's call our input function and let's store, for example, number 5. It will be stored as a string inside our variable and let's check if now our variable X now has value 5. That value is not going to be integer value, it's going to be string value, but at this point it doesn't matter. Let's print the result of our X and as you can see X has value as an value number 5. So with usage of input function we got the value from the user. That's all in this lesson, thanks for watching, bye bye.