So radical, fundamental principles of freedom, rational self-interest, and individual rights. This is The Iran Brook Show. All right everybody, welcome to Iran Brook Show on this Wednesday, November 22nd, the day before Thanksgiving. I hope everybody is excited and is looking forward to a fantastic Thanksgiving, so happy Thanksgiving to everybody.  So my internet, playing weird games with me. There we go. All right, we have got a lot to talk about today. As always, the world produces tons of newsworthy stories for us, and we will get to those in a second. I want to remind everybody that you can use the Super Chat to ask questions and support the show and show your thanks to this particular producer. You can use the Super Chat, you can use the sticker, however, whichever way you want to do it. I want to remind everybody under an institute as a sponsor of the show, and ARI has on Tuesday, November 28th, an event celebrating the success of a program that is providing Fountainhead books to young people, not just Fountainhead, but Fountainhead in addition. It's to celebrate the inspiration that INRAN's books provide for all of us and young people all over the world. So you can join. You'll hear about the work. You can hear about the progress being made in terms of providing books to young people all over the world and inspiring them, kind of the results of all of that. I encourage you to participate. It's going to be a lot of fun, and I think it's going to be very motivated. We are looking for some good news in these bleak times. This is certainly some good news. So you can go to INRAN.org slash start here where you can learn more and sign up. It's free. It's on Zoom or Zoom-like or whatever. And yeah, go sign up and participate. It'll be a lot of, it'll be really worthwhile. So I think it will inspire and be something that you will enjoy. And it'll show those of you who are contributors to the INRAN Institute, it'll show you how your dollars are being spent. And those of you who are not yet contributors to the INRAN Institute, maybe this will inspire you to actually become contributors because of the values that the INRAN Institute actually produces. All right, I need to click this button and do this and that, clear that, and we are good to go. All right, so let's focus today on, let's focus on our news. As I said, there's a lot to talk about. As you probably have heard, because it's all over the media, it's everywhere, Elon Musk has sued, I think he filed the lawsuit on Monday, an organization called Media Matters. Presents itself as an organization that is out there to let advertisers and let others know about the media, about fringe opinions, about extremism, let's call it that. That's what they call it in the media. To let the advertisers and others know when they identify bad stuff, bad ideas being prevalent out there and look, an organization like this is valuable, it could be valuable, put it that way, providing information and providing screening of the media, which a lot of us don't have time to do and a lot of advertisers probably don't have time to do. And I know a lot of advertisers would prefer not to be associated with certain fringe views and certain fringe opinions. But of course, Media Matters is dominated by the left and it's dominated by a leftist agenda. So you're unlikely to see Media Matters flag for advertisers support of Hamas or support for the Palestinians or support for other crazy left-wing agenda items, so they're not going to identify CRT or any of the kind of postmodern left's agenda as worthy of flagging because that is to them mainstream, so they're much more focused on anything on the right that they view as offensive. In particular, they're going after X or Twitter, as I like to call them, or as they used to be called and as they still should be called, you know, Twitter since Elon Musk has taken over is being portrayed as this right-wing nutty place where right-wing crazies, the nutty part of the right-wing is dominating the conversation. I don't have the stats on it. There is a lot of crazy right-wing people on X. There's no question about that. There's a lot of racism, anti-Semitism, new right, alt-right, whatever you want to call it. There's also a lot of crazy left on X, so there's a huge number of them. And the standard by which Elon Musk allows some people to be on and other people's not to be on is still ambiguous and undefined and ill-defined, just like it was before Elon Musk joins. I guess he allows a bigger spectrum, but my opposition always has been to the lack of objectivity. What I want is an objective standard. He has still not provided such an objective standard, and that stays detriment, and that is really unfortunate. Anyway, Media Matters last week flagged Twitter as basically showing ads for mainstream companies out there with adjacent to posts that were anti-Semitic, what they defined as far right, but no, really racist anti-Semitic alt-right type posts, and next to them you would find ads supposedly of Apple or MGM or other companies, regular companies out there, NBA, NBC Universal, Amazon, and companies like that.   That's okay to comment positively on a known anti-Semite's tweet according to Elon Musk.  He was responsible, shows awful judgment, and his backtracking from it was weak and pathetic, and yeah, I get that people like Ben Shapiro and others need to talk to Carlson and others need to support Elon Musk because they depend on him so much, but I call it the way I see it. Anyway, a lot of these companies withdrew all advertising from Twitter, Twitter, which is barely surviving financially anyway, which is struggling financially in terms of generating revenue, has been from before Musk, but is more so with Musk because there's been less advertising once Musk has taken over, can't afford to lose their biggest advertisers, including Apple. The concept of that could be devastating for Twitter and could be devastating for Musk himself. Right? And so Musk filed the lawsuit on Monday saying the media matters is purposefully, purposefully manipulating the screenshots that it's getting from Twitter in order to show something that doesn't really exist. And they're making the case that what Twitter's doing, what media matters is doing is they're gaming the algorithm. They found ways to game the algorithm so that the algorithm will produce on the same screen tweets by ultra racist tweets, anti-semitic tweets, and right next to them advertisement. So Twitter's not denying that such occurrences happen. But Twitter's denying that they happen systematically at all, they're claiming it's very, very rare, and that the only reason you see so many of these, I'm not sure what I did there to make this full screen, let's see if that fixes it, that fixes, there we go. The only reason that media matters can show so many of these and so much of this is because they've manipulated the data, they've manipulated the algorithm, and therefore it is suing them for all the lost business that they have as a consequence of their recommendations. It's going to be interesting to see what happens. I'm not surprised at all to find that Elon Musk is right about this. Media matters I'm sure is manipulated this in one way or another. Another report, this one in the New York Post claim that they basically refresh the screen, refresh the screen a billion times in order to find one screen where they found this relationship and it's very, very uncommon and it's very rare. And so it'll be interesting to see how the lawsuit plays out. Media matters clearly is a partisan, biased organization, it is sad that there is no better entity to provide this kind of information for large corporations, but it's also sad as I said that Twitter does not have some kind of objective standard for what it permits on its website and what it doesn't. It really is and has been since he took over, it really is whatever Elon feels like that is permitted and whatever he doesn't feel like that is banned. And the sense is that it's completely up to Elon Musk and there's no standard way which creators and posters know whether something they're doing is not acceptable or is acceptable. And in that sense I'm not saying it's worse than it was before. I'm saying it's not that different than it was before. The only difference is now it's one man's whim determines the standards and before it was a committee's whim that determined the standards, but in neither case have the standards being in any sense objective. Objective, I mean, I don't mean objectivist. I mean objective in the sense of understandable, when I read a post I know this is acceptable, this is not acceptable, what is acceptable or what isn't acceptable. Who knows? Nobody knows.  If it pisses him off it might become very quickly unacceptable and booted off of Twitter. That's sad. You'd think you'd have these smart guys, they'd be able to come up with some objective standard that we can all live by. Anyway, interesting to follow media matters and see what the ultimate outcome is going to be. All right, so as you know I think it's common news right now that there is a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas, just saying that is pretty disgusting. And under this agreement Hamas has promised to release 50 maybe a little bit more, 50 hostages, children and women and in exchange Israel is going to release 150, that's three to one, 150 children and women.  What is going on here?  And then you look at the list of the people being released. And the Hamas list is, you know, of Israelis being released of the four-year-olds, one and a half year olds, a few weeks old, women who are still breastfeeding their baby with their baby, six year olds, 10 year olds, 11 year olds. These are the children that Hamas is releasing, real children, right, real children. Let me just comment on this quickly, Ken says, Elon Musk is in control now, we need an objective standard.  Yes, because Elon Musk is in charge, we need an objective standard. He is not objective. That's just reality. All you have to do is follow his tweets and you can see that. Anyway, so you've got Hamas is releasing children, really, you know, little kids, that they kidnapped with their mothers in some cases, some cases without their mothers. Fathers will not be released because in some cases they took over whole, they took whole families. But you look at the list and you look at the ages and it's stunning.  You look at the list Israel publishes. When you look at the children, the children are 16, 17 and 18 year olds. They're accused of attacking Israelis with knives. They're accused of throwing stones and rocks. They're accused of violence. These are not children in the same category as the children Hamas is releasing. And then you look at the women, the list of the Israeli women Hamas is releasing, or all mothers, you look at the list of the children or women that they just kidnapped, basically off the street. You look at the women that Israel is releasing again. Women accused of attacking people with a knife. Women accused of violent acts or conspiring to violence. There was no moral equivalence. The people Israel had in jail deserve to be in jail. And yet this hostage release exchange is just horrific in terms of the image it presents and the way it's being spun in terms of Israel. While Israel imprisoned children, why shouldn't Hamas? Big difference between a three year old and an 18 year old who's throwing rocks at people.  Doesn't really matter. All right. I'm going to say one more thing about Twitter because it's Scott and Kana incapable of actually listening or they're just blatant liars, which is quite possible, you know, but they can keep up with actually understanding an argument.  It would be my only or they're dishonest because it's one or the other. It can be both. Elon Musk and the previous owners of Twitter can do whatever the hell they want with Twitter. I've always said that I continue to say that they can run it any way they want. I critique the previous owners of Twitter and I critique Elon Musk in the same way. For us, users of Twitter, we would like to have objective values, objective standards.  They can't. It's private property. I've always said that I've never flip flopped, never flip flopped. You just can't listen because you can't accept an attack on your God, pretty much anybody on the right, but certainly Elon Musk. And you certainly cannot listen to the fact that when I said Twitter was privately owned and therefore should be able to publish whatever they want, you attacked me for that. And now when it's somebody you like actually owns, you think, yeah, it's his company. You can do whatever he wants. So you're the ones flip flopping. You're the ones who are inconsistent. And you project that inconsistency onto me. That is just not true.  You just can't hear. All right, that's a problem you find in our culture. People can't actually, because they pigeonhole you into, oh my God, he's saying something I'm against, therefore he must be wrong, therefore I can't hear what he's saying. All right, so the hostages, this is a huge setback for Israel, but it's a moral setback for Israel, the fact that they negotiate with Hamas, the fact that there's a certain moral equivalency between the people that they are releasing and between the people Hamas is releasing. There's an acknowledgement of Hamas as an entity one negotiates with. I mean, there's all of that. So just on a moral front, this is obscene. It should have never happened. And then at the military front, Israel is making real systematic progress. It is days, maybe a week away from completely controlling Northern Gaza, from having complete control over that pot and destroying the entire infrastructure of Hamas in Northern Gaza. It is just starting to enter to major Hamas bastions in Gaza, in the northeast of Gaza. And it is basically almost finished in circling them. And it was going to go in and dismantle it. There are very few civilians in that part of Northern Gaza, and they can basically go in and flatten the place and destroy Hamas, at least in that part of Gaza. They were also days away from starting a campaign in the south and starting to enter Southern Gaza to destroy Hamas infrastructure over there. This basically stops them. The ceasefire right now is for four days. But if Hamas continues to release hostages, Israel will continue to extend the ceasefire. A ceasefire could be extended to 10 days. Now what's going to happen in those 10 days? Hamas is going to reorganize. It's going to bolster its positions. It's going to either abandon its positions in the north and get the people into the south, or it's going to allow them to build more defensible positions in the north, thus facilitating the killing of more Israeli soldiers. That seems weird. It is weird. Okay. In other words, in addition, Israel is committed to huge amounts of aid, including gasoline, into the Gaza Strip during this period. During that period, all this gas and all these goods that are going to be delivered, they're going to be handed to Hamas. On top of that, I want to bet about the ability of Hamas to smuggle in weapons with all that aid. We know what the aid agencies are capable of and not. So this is massively strategically a horrible decision. It is going to cost the lives of many Israeli soldiers. It is militarily just insane. It is morally treasonous. It is horrible. It is horrible. And this is by your hawk, the person so many of you admire and love and that is Bibi Netanyahu. This is his choices, his government, his prime minister, his responsibility. And when those kids die, when the ceasefire is over, what's he going to tell their mothers and fathers? Now, true, he released 50 hostages. How many of these soldiers does that warrant having killed? How much legitimization of Hamas was all this worth? Anyway, horrific, sad, and predictable. I told you this would happen. I told you this on day one. I know Netanyahu. I know the kind of pressure he's under and I know his inability to withstand that pressure. And I don't know how Israel starts up again the war once the ceasefire is over. I don't know how successful they will be in doing that. I don't know, you know, it takes a lot of energy to start up again. Israel had the momentum on its side. By the way, one of the conditions of the ceasefire is that Israel flying no surveillance aircraft in the sky above Gaza. Can you imagine agreeing to that so that they can't spy on what Hamas is doing? So the Hamas gets four days where they can do whatever they want. They can move around, they can reinforce, they can go into hiding, they can do what they need to do. We replenish their supplies, build barricades, build booby traps. All the stuff they will do to kill Israeli soldiers. And Israel will not have eyes on it, not have eyes on it. It's just insane. It's just we live in an insane world.  You know, when I talked about media matters, I wanted to talk about one other story that has to do with journalism and just the level of dishonesty in journalism today, as it, in particular as it relates to Gaza. But generally, you know, I think the media matters exhibit that dishonesty. But here's another one. This is a story of a journalist who's decided to break his silence. Jan Frank, who is, I guess, a Dutch journalist. And he decided about six days ago to publish his first-hand experiences at Auschifa Hospital in Gaza. He used to be a Tel Aviv-based freelance reporter for Dutch and international media outlets, frequently worked in Gaza between 2014 and 2019. And as he says in this series of tweets, I mean, he witnessed firsthand Hamas operating within the hospital. But more than that, he witnessed firsthand that other reporters saw it. He witnessed firsthand that UN operatives saw it. He witnessed firsthand that WHO people saw it. And yet when the hostility started and all this about Auschifa Hospital started, where were these reporters? Where's the WHO? WHO denied that the hospital was being used by Hamas. The UN denied that it was being used by Hamas. The reporters all denied that it was used. They all lied. Journalists lied explicitly. That's what Jan is claiming. And I believe him. They lied to protect what? Their sources? Or out of their hatred of Israel and their support for the Palestinian cause? We have, I mean, there are exceptions. Jan is an exception here. He's willing to speak up. And there's no question that since he started to speak up, his life has been pretty intense. He's received death threats. He's been cursed at. His professionalism, integrity have been attacked. Even by other Dutch journalists who know he's right, who know it's the truth. Journalists today, sadly, so many of them are either cowards or ideologically motivated to lie to us. Because that are further the cause that they believe in. Rather than the fact that they believe in the truth. Than tell the truth. Douglas Murray is not a journalist. So somebody said Douglas Murray is doing a good job. But he's not a journalist. And he's not perceived as a journalist. He's not taken as a journalist. I mean, media matters is not the only journalistic enterprise that is completely capitulated to politics and completely capitulated in this case to the left. I mean, the dishonesty of the UN, the dishonesty of the World Health Organization, I mean, these alone should warrant the United States leaving these organizations, abandoning them. But the dishonesty of the journalists makes one have to be suspicious of anything they tell us. All right. Okay, let's shift to a minute to tech. Two tech stories. One we've already talked about, but just want to wrap it up. And another one, which is new. The new one is Binance. Many of you might not know Binance. Binance is a massive company. It is the largest crypto company in the world. It is a crypto exchange among many other things all related to crypto. It was started by, its founder was, his name is abbreviated as all of these guys' names are abbreviated, I guess, in the crypto world. To CZ, his name is Changping Zhao. Changping Zhao is rumored to be worth something like $23 billion. The company has been incredibly successful and wealthy. He, Zhao, has been one of the most vocal advocates for crypto, one of the most powerful people in the space. And to a large extent, if you remember, it's to some extent his beef with SBF that led ultimately to SBF's company going bust when it did. It would have gone anyway, but CZ refused to bail them out. Well, yesterday there was this big press conference that wishes just this department and a number of government agencies all announced that they had come to a settlement with Binance, where Binance had agreed, basically pled guilty to money laundering and all kinds of other regulatory and federal legal violations. Right. As part of this, there is a consent order which is going to require Binance to disgorge $1.3 billion of ill-gotten gains and pay $1.35 billion civil monetary penalty to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, all to be used to fund the Commodity Futures Trading Commission going after the next people. And I don't know who gets this money. I guess it goes to federal government. As Treasury Secretary Yellen said, Binance turned a blind eye to its legal obligations in the pursuit of profits, its will for failures allowed money to flow to terrorists, cyber criminals, child abusers through its platform. CZ himself pled guilty to turning a blind eye, basically, to money laundering. As a result, he faces a maximum of 10 years behind bars. Given that he pled guilty, I doubt he'll get that. He'll probably get about 18 months behind bars. He is also, this, though, he says he's going to pay $200 million fine. I bet somebody else, he's going to somewhere else, he's going to pay $50 million fine. Yeah, it's just $50 million. So I'm not sure. There's some inconsistency around this. Binance's operations are going to be watched by somebody from the U.S. government.  The only party that's not part of this is the SEC, which is interesting because my suspicion is that the SEC is going to go after them for other things. And therefore, it didn't want to be a part of this and what this provides it, it now complete visibility into everything Binance because this will open up the entire books to the U.S. government. The U.S. officials say the Binance allowed for more than 100,000 transactions involving illicit activities, as well as more than 1.5 million virtual currency trades that violated U.S. sanctions, including sanctions on Iran, Syria, and Cuba. They allege that all kinds of laundering of dark net market transactions, hacks, ransomware, and scams, basically it was a free-for-all for all criminals and evil regimes out there in the world. Now Binance is a huge player. Let's be real here. I mean Binance is, to a large extent, the number one player in the crypto world. This is the big, the only player left now that is not being gone after by the government is Coinbase, although they have some lawsuits as well against them. But they were the only player in the space left that has not come to some either shutdown or come to some kind of agreement with U.S. government. Of course, this is also a major blow to crypto. It's a major blow to people who believed that crypto could allow you to do anything you wanted and that the government would not do anything about it or that the government could not do anything about it. And this is really what the government here is trying to do. The government here is trying to assert they control. I don't know how many of these claims are true or not. They probably are. But the reality is that U.S. government went after Binance and was going after crypto, not because they're afraid that their rights being violated. The U.S. government is going after Binance and crypto because they have no control over them. The U.S. government is going after Binance and crypto more broadly because they don't want transactions to happen that they can't control, that they can't manipulate, that they can't regulate, that are outside of their sphere of influence. This is status asserting the power, asserting their control. Now, I know the crypto world will say, well, yes, but now we'll go to decentralized exchanges and decentralized this and decentralized that and we'll get around the government and ultimately we will win, the government will lose. Maybe we will see. I doubt that. I think we should all take this very seriously in the sense that the government has every intention to either make crypto part of the system and thereby regulate, control it and make sure that it behaves according to the status demands and needs or shut it down. But it will not tolerate rogue activities. For all of you who think bitcoin is going to replace money, the government is never going to allow that. They will use these kind of laws to shut bitcoin down. In one way or another. Now you say they can't, sure they can. They can make it illegal to sell a product for bitcoin. That's observable. They can track down who owns bitcoin and where the transactions are going. Bitcoin is not anonymous. The chain of custody is knowable. The government is going to pull out all the stops to again take control of a crypto. They're now going to be ETFs on bitcoin. And what that means is what the government wants to do is it wants the certain corners of the crypto world. They want to bring under their regulatory regime. They want to bring out of their control. And the parts that they cannot bring under their control, they want to destroy. And I think many of you are naive enough to think that they can't do that. Bitcoin is not freedom. It's a false definition of freedom. And bitcoin cannot facilitate freedom because it's not truly anonymous. And the government has a lot of control of how it's going to be used. And it will bring it in to that control. I mean it might be the case that in Argentina, Milay allows bitcoin to be used. But when the US government decides, we don't like that, then what they will do is they will tell Argentinian banks to stop with bitcoin. Otherwise, they'll kick them out to the Federal Reserve System. And that's impossible then to use dollars in Argentina. And I'm not sure which way Milay will then go if the US government ever does that. Bois emphasizes bitcoin is freedom. No, I mean you guys have a false view of what freedom is. Really false view of what freedom is. Bitcoin is bitcoin. It's just me, it's just a, right now it's just something you can play around with and you can watch it go up and you can watch it go down. And you can, it's just an asset. An asset cannot be freedom. It's not money, it's just a digital asset. And whether it's worth anything or not is completely dependent on other people's belief system. Anyway, I think it's a big story, the Binance story. It's, it's shaken up this world. It's shaken up the crypto world. It is, and it's clearly made the government intentions very clear if anybody didn't understand them. The government is, is not going to allow this to go rogue. And so it's not going to allow bitcoin to become a facilitator of freedom because the government doesn't want it. It wants to control. It wants to control you and it wants to control you through controlling your money.  They're not going to allow that to go away. Sadly, sadly, I'm all for it. Sadly, I'm all for money, private money, all of that. Government will never allow it. I mean, never's a long time, but it's not going to allow it anytime soon. Okay, quickly, open AI, a lot of stories around open AI, but the bottom line is Sam Altman is back. The board, most of the board that was there has resigned. You know, the two, the two outside directors are gone. The one outside director, the guy from Quora is staying for now. I'm not sure what happens to Chief Scientist. A new board member has been added. The interim CEO that they brought in for open AI is gone. It does look like Sam Altman has one control over open AI. I think as a consequence, we haven't announced this yet, but as a consequence, they will be changing their corporate structure. I think they will be turning the whole thing into a for-profit. They'll be bringing in investors onto the board of directors. And that will be the completion of the story, will be Sam Altman's complete dominance of this. In the background, there is a fascinating story about effective altruism and the rationalist community, and the A.I. Dumarism and Dumas, and that battle between A.I. Dumists, who are mostly effective altruists and rationalists, and the rest of the tech community will continue that battle. To some extent, it is a philosophical battle. They are now being presented to the world moral alternatives to effective altruism, because people are disgusted by the effective altruism movement, partially because of SBF and partially because of things like what just happened at Open AI. I think it's going to be a fascinating story. It's going to, to some extent, at least, the struggle is going to shape Silicon Valley. It is interesting that some people are labeling them effective AI and rationalist community as those atheists and presenting this as believers versus atheists. I mean, that sounds weird to me, but I have seen reports over that, left versus right in Silicon Valley. What I think is good here is that Sam Altman, who clearly has a vision for AI, who clearly is one of the pioneers in this, who clearly wants to move forward and commercialize this and create something, build something. Sadly, he's also a guy who's gone to the government to regulate. He's also a guy who's talked about demeritism. But one wonders if the whole doom stuff and the regulatory stuff wasn't something he had to do to appease his board, now I'm starting to wonder, what does Sam Altman actually believe? I don't know. And if he's got ridden of the board, particularly the most obnoxious people in the board, will he be able to speak freely now about what he really believes about AI and the future of AI? I hope so, because I'm curious, and clearly this is a pioneering guy, a great entrepreneur, and I want to see him succeed. I want to see AI revolutionize the world in which we live. I want to see the changes it brings to us. All right, let's see. Quick reminder before we go to the Dutch elections, please consider liking the show. It doesn't cost you anything. It doesn't require anything. Just a click of the button, and it helps a lot with the algorithms. It really does. We've got 153 people watching live right now. Only 67 likes. We can do better than that. Also, I want to encourage those of you who are not subscribers to the show, please consider subscribing and finding out about more shows and, again, it'll help the algorithm. So, please, please, please consider subscribing. Also, those of you who would like to support the show, to keep it going, to support what I do here, please consider asking a question or doing a sticker.  We need five, six of those to meet our target. And so, please consider supporting the show. There's a lot of you who probably knew, who probably never done a super chat. Please consider doing it. It's that dollar sign at the bottom of your screen there. It's pretty easy to do. And it supports what we're trying to do here, and it's what I live on. So, and I do a lot of these shows. So, if you support what I do, please consider making a financial contribution. All right, Dutch elections are happening right now, as we speak, or maybe it's already over. They're five hours ahead. Maybe polls have already closed. They're about to close. It is a close competition. It was a close competition between two center-right parties. And then there is one kind of green party that is also running. But it really does seem like the center-right is the dominant force here. A surprise, I think, for many people is that a third-right-wing party is doing very, very well. And that is Goetz, Rinders, and I'm sure I'm mispronouncing that. A political party is going to come out of nowhere. And now might win the election. It might get the most votes. If not, it might get the second or third-most votes. It's going to be a major player in the next government. It also appears that the likely party that will form the next government will agree to form it with Goetz, in spite of the fact that in the past, nobody wanted him in the government. It looks like this time he will be in. He is known for being super anti-Islam. He says some good things. He says some really bad things. He's a really, really mixed bag. But generally, I think the coalition that will be formed after these elections is likely to be very anti-immigrant, very anti-EU. I don't think Brexit like anti-EU, but generally skeptical of EU. Probably more friendly to the farmers. You remember all the farming kind of demonstrations in Holland over the last few years and focused on the economy of the Netherlands and making sure that it is not used to subsidize the failures within the world of Europe, Southern Europe primarily. So it's going to be interesting. I'm just pointing this out. I don't know what the outcome is going to be. Once we see the outcome, we can comment more. And of course, people are worried about cost of living. There's a horrible housing crisis like there is everywhere in the world. And of course, that is primarily a consequence of lack of supply and high interest rates. High interest rates, they have very little control over. That's basically said by the European Central Bank, the same with cost of living inflation. But they have control of supply of housing. So we will see what the party looks like and what the government looks like and what are likely to be its agenda items. We'll probably look at that on Friday when we do the next news roundup. But it looks like Europe is swinging to the right a kind of what do you call it, social issues right? Not a right when it comes to economic issues, but certainly Europe is swinging to populism and to a nationalist anti-immigration but also a kind of a eurosceptical and not particularly free market right. Not particularly free market right. So it's going to be interesting. And of course, the big election coming up I think is next year in Germany. That'll be the one most interesting. All right. We still got about $100 short of our goal. So please consider helping close that gap in the next few minutes in our lot, probably five, 10 minutes. And we are done. And let's look at some of the questions we have here. Andrew Traeger, Andrew says, Israel-Israeli spokesman should be more aggressive and challenging the UN in the media. Oh, yeah, absolutely. They should be 100 times more aggressive.  They need to be a lot more aggressive. They do try to correct the record, but there's a lack of passion that comes from moral certainty. How would your communication strategy differ? Well, look, I would do just a whole thing on the UN and I would go through systematically the ways in which the UN is unbelievably biased against Israel. I would do the same with the media. I would do it the same with the WHO. I would systematically present the evidence and call them out and call them liars. Call them liars. I mean, the Secretary General of the UN right now is lying regularly, constantly on Twitter. This is the more people, civilians are dying in this conflict than any conflict that Syria, Yemen, just two examples. Sudan, we're more civilians have died than what is going on in Gaza right now. Many more civilians have died. So, I mean, it's ludicrous. It, they are liars, cheaters. Well, Rwanda might not, Rwanda may be ancient history for him. We're talking about in just now this so they should call them anti-semitic. Call the UN an anti-semitic organization, which they are clearly an anti-Israel organization. Organization unworthy. I mean, Security Council, you've got Putin who basically is doing in Ukraine what Hamas would like to do to Israel. Killing civilians indiscriminately. Rape and pillage were part of the Russian initial invasion. He's taking children away from Ukrainians and taking them into Russia to be re-endocrinated. And he's on the Security Council. Somebody should call that out. If America had balls, America would call that out. But no, nobody in the world in which we live has that kind of courage to talk about these issues, to call them out and to give it, kind of put it in moral terms. This is evil. This is, this is an evil organization. The UN is an evil organization. I would call it that. I would call it that. Wow, Sivanos. Thank you. Sivanos just came in with $100. Always short is $11. Somebody could do that. Tell us, please, as best you can, how would you convert civilians in the West Bank Gaza from Islam and the wrong thinking that has perpetrated the problems over there? Sticks or carrot? Well, you have to start with stick. And I don't think you have to convert them from Islam. I do not believe that this is necessary in terms of Islam. Just as Christianity was pacified and Judaism was pacified, so can Islam be pacified. Indeed, there are many countries that have Muslim majority people, Azerbaijan, Albania, where there is no barbarism, there is no this horrors and where the population is Muslim but secular. And indeed, I'll say more than that, the Palestinians used to be pretty secular. They used to be the most secular people in the Arab world. It's only the last 30 years of they being become more and more and more religious under the influence of Hamas. So the first thing you have to do is through military action, you know, through military action, they have to be subdued. They have to be brought to their knees. They have to understand and this has to be told to them. They have to understand that their cause will always lose, that they have absolutely zero chance. Now they hang their chances on, well, the world will be on our side.  And it has to act on this. We are going to suppress you.  You must submit. You must reject the idea of destroying Israel. And if you don't, then we will continue to dismantle the infrastructure that makes life possible for you. And then at some point after they've kind of devastated the place, they need to occupy it. They have to make sure the curriculum in the schools are very different. Yeah, I wonder if you would say Islam is submission. Yes, but submission to something else, not to Allah, but to Israel. They need to make sure, as I think was the case in the 70s and 80s, that the curriculum being taught in the schools is not anti-Semitic, anti-Israeli, hate-filled garbage, but that they're learning math, science, reading, literature. They're learning Hebrew and Arabic. They need to be under the control of Israel, occupied by Israel, full occupation, you know, probably for a generation until the kind of thinking that the Palestinians have today, the kind of attitude they have today towards Israel, the kind of views that they have today towards Jews and Israelis, are history, are gone. They are re-educated, not brainwashed, but that propaganda is gone. They need to rename their streets and their schools away from naming them after martyrs who kill Israelis. Their political leadership needs to be dismantled, and I include here the Palestinian Authority, which is just marginally slightly better than Hamas. Their entire political leadership needs to be dismantled. Their entire military infrastructure, policing infrastructure, weapons infrastructure, needs to be destroyed. And they need to be told, you will never win. We will always be here, and we will destroy you, and we will do whatever is necessary to protect ourselves.   And that's why Israel's response to Hamas needs to be massively disproportionate. They need to feel the pain in a way that is sad that you have to inflict it, but they have to feel the pain. And that's true in the West Bank and in Gaza. And Israel needs to take care of its enemies, because that's part of it, right? As long as Hamas thinks that Hezbollah is going to save them, or Iran will save them. Hezbollah needs to be demolished, destroyed completely and thoroughly. Whether now or in a month or in a year, it has to happen. Otherwise there will be no peace. It needs to be destroyed in southern Lebanon. It needs to be destroyed in Beirut. It's, again, political, spiritual and military leadership needs to be killed. And then, of course, to find a piece of this has to be, in one way or another, an Iranian revolution that gets rid of the theocratic regime in Iran. And if Israel has to support that by bombing the institutions of power in Iran, then that is what Israel needs to do. You cannot leave the cancer there. You cannot leave any element of the cancer. You need to eradicate the cancer. That means defeating the Palestinians. I'm not saying defeating Hamas. Defeating the Palestinian people. The Palestinian people are the enemy. It's BS that it's Hamas is the enemy. We're not fighting the Palestinian people. Of course you are fighting the Palestinian, they are fighting the Palestinian people. It means defeating Hezbollah. I mean it's defeating Iran. Until you do those three things, there will not be peace. The Palestinians will not be subdued. And you'll just have to keep on doing this stuff. And death and destruction constantly. Ovid Sandvik from Norway. Sorry, I brutalized your name. Mario Nafal is a Peter Keating. Yeah, I think that's right. He has left his thinking and that has been taken care of by others. He doesn't think for himself. He's completely not independent. Are obsessed with being liked by everybody. Yes. And that's being hated by everybody. So he pleases nobody right now. But yes, I think he pleases his intellectual friends who want to be balanced, who want to be fair, who want to be quote objective. But it's all BS. So yeah, he has been terrible. I've been commenting on his posts. Just terrible. Marvel equivalency everywhere. But worse, taking anything the Palestinians are selling and your Hamas says at face value. And anything Israel says, do we really believe this? What evidence have they presented? Do we believe the evidence? Like always with a skeptical tone. But Hamas says something. Oh, that's the absolute truth. He is driven like everybody, by almost everybody, by altruism. The weak, the oppressed are always right. Are always the good. Hey, guys, we need more likes. So don't forget to like the show before you leave. Don't forget to subscribe. If you're not a subscriber and don't forget to support the show on Patreon or in your own bookshow that comes last support. PayPal. Boss says, buy some Bitcoin today. You will not regret it. Or you will maybe. I can't pronounce this name. Kabutra Han from again, no, no way. Are you in favor of urban planning? No, I'm not in favor of urban planning. Not of government urban planning. I'm in favor of private urban planning. That is private companies buying pieces of land, large pieces of land and building cities, neighborhoods, whatever you want to call it on there and having it planned that way. So as long as it's private, fine, planning is good. What I'm opposed to is any kind of government urban planning. That is the imposition of government on how we should live. And it is devoid of competition. And it again is not a world of government. The world of government is to protect us from criminals, frauds, rapists, murderers, but to leave us alone otherwise. And that means to plan for ourselves. And that means that if individuals want to buy up vast quantities of land and plan something and build on it based on that kind of planning, I'm all for. So government should not be zoning and should not be planning. Not the world of government. And it only distorts. Andrew, thoughts on the self-esteem of a country that indicates by its attitude towards immigration. Yeah, I've said this many, many times. A self-confidence country, confidence in its values, confidence in what it stands for, confidence in its system of government, is open to immigrants because it knows that it can assimilate anybody who comes in. It knows that anybody comes in will leave his garbage behind and bring only the good that he has to offer. Because the culture of the country you emigrate to will not tolerate the garbage. Whether that's because of the rule of law or whether that's because just culturally they will not tolerate it. You might in your culture show up to work whenever you feel like it. Not in my culture. I fire you if you don't show up on time. It's one way in which immigrants are forced to adopt the host country's values. But that assumes they don't get welfare. That assumes they have to go to work. Work is an important way in which we assimilate immigrants. Demon, pay, day, son, okay. Hope you are having a good day, Iran. Also, cheers. I convinced my friend to read Atlas Shrugged. Now that he started, can't stop. We discuss each chapter. Fantastic. Thank you. That is great. Also, what would you do financially if you were in your early 30s today as a young objectivist, of course? Well, that's way too vague of a concept. What would I do financially? It depends on how much money I had, what kind of job I had, what my income was. It's very dependent. But why don't we do this, Demon? I will do, I promise this, but since I have to do, since I promise you guys positive shows, I'll do a show on financial planning. And really address young people in that context.  It depends on all of those kind of things. And it depends on how you see the world. I still think a lot of value is going to be created in companies like AI and companies in Silicon Valley and so on. And I would try to invest accordingly or I would not abandon markets out of the notion that the world is going to end. The world typically doesn't end. We're still here. And when the world doesn't end, markets tend to do pretty well. Financial markets tend to be pretty well. All right, but I will do a financial planning class. All right, everybody, have a fantastic evening tomorrow. Don't forget to forget all the wars and struggles and problems and challenges that exist out there in the world. Relax, have a great time with friends and family. Eat a lot. You can exercise later. Don't drink too much. You can't rid of the alcohol if you drink too much. That never comes back. What else? Yeah, celebrate and show some appreciation to yourself, to yourself, to the productive in you. So, have a great Thanksgiving. I'll see you after the holiday on Friday. And yeah, thank you to all the superchattage. You guys were great. Thank you to Savannah, who got us over the top. I'll see you all very, very soon. Bye, everybody.


i've always miked a snare drum from the top Or you know and and or the bottom. I've never seen anybody mic a snare drum from the side That is just insane to me and then yeah, here's another shot where you know He's I mean the video's got some really great shots in it and the camera guy was on stage And then here's a cool shot from where the guy was standing up over alex He'd get a good view of things and uh, the other thing I thought was kind of funny I saw this on a guitar for him. He can't see this in my photos But where alex is um, he's playing the solo at the very end of hot for teacher Well, um in the video you can see over to his left Greg neverson creeps up over his side and does something to the hi-hat And I was watching this um interview on a you know some guys on a guitar show were talking about this And they were saying alex is so powerful He broke the hi-hat and you can see his tech end to fix it and I'm like, you know, of course I'm laughing going bunch of guitar players They don't know anything I mean because he was playing half a teacher where they had the hats partially closed So greg had to come in he wasn't using a hi-hat clutch So greg had to come in and he had to reopen the hi-hats again Greg would literally manually come in lower the hats form so that he could have him partially closed for half a teacher But while alex was off to the you know floor toms finishing up his solo Greg would sneak in there and put the hats back up But I just thought it was funny because I know as a drummer I knew exactly what he was doing but to see a bunch of guitar players. Oh, he broke the hi-hat No, they don't know what they're talking about. I thought that was kind of humorous. That is funny Some other you know shots you can see the set list off was left there. It's a still kind of daytime So that basically our you know, he did these five shows and it's really kind of a sad way to end things but they ended up um Doing the last show in Nuremberg, Germany and Went their separate ways went home and and and that was it the band never really, you know The band you know, they can they they carried on but sammy hagar joined but the the kits became You know the kits stayed cool. So there's plenty more to talk about to talk about and we can we can end it here if you'd like and Yes, I think we should for the sake. Yes. I know it's been it's been quite a long time. It's no, this is good This is what people like and they they want out of these episodes is the deep deep deep dive Yeah, so there's still lots to talk about so Um, we will end here though for the sake of time in part one and then curtain I'll record part two and we'll we'll have that out soon after this The week after you guys Watch this. Um, so curt anything you want to plug as we kind of wrap up this episode and Tell people where to find you or anything cool.  I'm on the usual places. I think in instagram although I don't use those I don't use those as much as you know, as most people would I I probably should be better at that but I guess i'm an old dude and I don't really, you know You know, that's all right Wfl curt you can find them around at wfl curt and uh, and again I want to say thank you to alex for being a big inspiration and and you know and and recognize this tech John douglas reporting a lot of work in the um Of the book that's called legends you can pick it up from modern drummer and it's got a lot of cool info in it Yeah, that's great This is a good primer and then people can go further and if they want to learn more about it's history And it's biography and all that stuff then i'm sure there's tons more info Yeah, and alex also alex just got inducted into the modern drummer hall of fame. So i'd like to say congratulations for that as well Yeah, yeah, yeah huge congrats to alex faniola. I mean it seems like such a cool guy. Um, so Okay, well, thank you to everyone for listening and sticking with us and per usual drop Comments about things that you like and if you saw them live and what concert you saw and your favorite kit Favorite album, uh things we may have missed and things that you know, you think oh, I think it's this instead or His early symbols, um stuff like that. So if people know more about like specifics You know with the symbols and all that feel free to you know, it's just fun to get a conversation There's just so many pieces and parts to all of this. It's unbelievable. Kurt. Thanks for being here man We'll get part two recorded and i'm excited to learn more about uh, you know his later kits as well But this is we've covered the iconic Beginning of alex faniola. So, uh, thank you kurt. All right. Well, thanks again for having me. I really appreciate it


Hi, my name is Jim Cummins, I'm a professor emeritus at the Ontario Institute for Studies and Education of the University of Toronto in Canada. When we look at who we are, how we interact in our everyday lives, it's very clear that language forms an essential component of everything about us. We speak particular languages, some of us speak more than one language. When we look at children growing up, their identities are being formed. They're being formed by the interactions that they experience with their parents, with siblings, with other children, with their interactions in a preschool environment. And what they develop in terms of their identities depends on the messages they receive about what's accepted and what's not accepted. And unfortunately, historically and currently, in a lot of preschool and school contexts, children's languages have not been accepted. The message that children have got is that they should leave their language at the school house door and that if they want to be accepted in the preschool or the school or the wider society, there's only the major societal language that's legitimate or valid. And this is rejecting a significant part of the students identity or the child's identity. And what we know from research is that children will do much better academically and have a more integrated sense of self when they maintain their home language as they're acquiring the school language. And so the goal should be multilingualism for students. The most obvious challenge is one of communication. If a student comes to school as a newcomer and knowing very little or none of the school language, obviously there's a communication gap. But what we know is that teachers can bridge that gap by using all kinds of cues to the meaning. The term that research is used to talk about this is scaffolding. And if we think about scaffolding that goes up outside a house or a building that workers are working on, what that does is it allows those workers to get to places that they couldn't have gotten without the scaffolding. And so scaffolding in the instructional sense means providing the supports for students to acquire the school language and to develop literacy in that language. And this will involve things like using visuals such as photographs, images, graphics, et cetera, diagrams to help get the meaning across. It'll also involve things like demonstrations where in the concrete situation we can show children what's required. When we look at newcomer students arriving in schools and unfortunately today we're in a situation where there are large numbers of Ukrainian children entering schools across Europe and countries like Canada and the United States as a result of the war in Ukraine. And many of these students have experienced traumatic experiences. Their fathers are often still in Ukraine. So there's a need for incredible sensitivity to the situation of these students. And this is something that obviously will be a concern to individual teachers. But what we know works much better than just individual teachers doing their own thing is if the entire school that comes together and talks about what kinds of schoolwide processes we should be engaging in to make the school a well-being place, a safe place for newcomer students. How can we involve parents in their children's education? How can we explain to parents what schooling is like in Belgium, in Ireland, in Canada or elsewhere? How can we provide resources for parents to help their children learn the school language? How can we communicate to students that their home language is valuable and it's something to be maintained? This requires discussion at the school level and it requires leadership from school principals, vice principals to make this happen. And involving children themselves, the children who are in the school already in terms of explaining to them that newcomer children are coming in, they're coming from a place called Ukraine. We can look it up on the map. We can see what's happening there. And that we want to provide a welcoming environment and what kinds of things can they come up with that might help newcomer students to settle in, to feel welcomed and to start learning and continue their education.


Men will always be suckers for women. Women are beautiful, intelligent and very attractive. Men therefore have to be careful in deciding which women they want to be with. When you are young, it is very easy to just enter into a relationship simply because you feel like when you are older, you are better equipped to make good decisions. Anyone can fall for a woman, but many fall for the wrong people. How do you know if you fell for the wrong woman or not? In today's video, I am going to share with you 9 reasons men fall in love with the wrong women. 1. They focus on physical attributes. Women are generally physically attractive. Being physically attractive should therefore not be a distinguishing feature. However, they are women who are exceptionally physically attractive. This makes men flock around them. Men who know what they want in a relationship shouldn't decide based on physical attributes only. There are many beautiful women in the world, but there are not as many independent and goal-oriented and tolerant women. If one desires a relationship with a woman, it is ideal to sit down to explore the desirable attributes you want in a partner. While the fact that they are physically attractive alone help you stay sane in the relationship, a woman can be beautiful and disrespectful.  For most men who are visionary, the answer is no. You need to take time to understand yourself. If you don't understand yourself, you will hardly be able to make a decision that is right for you. 2. They are not confident in themselves. We are naturally attracted to people who we feel have what we think is lacking in us. This explains why baseball players in school have a lot of admirers. People want to be able to play like them. The same is applicable to people with other talents. If a woman is extremely talented, men will often desire her. While there is absolutely nothing wrong with desiring a girl, wanting her only because of her talents may well backfire on the long run. You see, there are many things involved in a relationship. There is emotional support, affection and mutual communication. A relationship which has only one of these may face challenges on the long run. A woman who is confident can also detect your low self-esteem, even if they accept to be with you and help you will change. If you don't, you risk losing them. As a general rule, don't date someone simply because they have what you don't. It is also a good idea to date for a while before entering into a relationship. Relationships have their own challenges. Unless you are self-aware and emotionally stable, you may not even be ready to get involved in one. 3. You don't want to be single Some men start dating simply because they don't want to be single. This is crazy, yet true. Some people can feel left out when all their friends are dating. They can then start dating the first women they come across just to belong. If you are doing this or about to, you probably should reconsider. According to a survey by Illicit Encounters, a British dating site for married people, 25 out of 1000 people ended up marrying their first love. This is less than 10%. I'm not an expert in relationship matters, but I think that it is better to slow down when trying to enter into a relationship. It is better you start later than end up heartbroken. A heartbroken man often never loves with as much passion as the first time. There is always a fear that the person you are with will betray you. This fear does not allow you to love the current person fully and it often ends up in a breakup like a self-fulfilling prophecy. 4. They think they can change her People are very complicated. They have past and experiences that you may never understand. It affects the way they relate with others and their approach to life. In starting a relationship, communication is very important. You need to understand who you are dealing with. Everybody wants to wake up in a relationship and realize that their partner is a junkie or a side prostitute. You need to take your time to evaluate the relationship and whether you and your partner are compatible. It is very foolish to remain in a relationship out of sympathy for the other party. If you have discovered something that makes it difficult for the two of you to be together, take time to evaluate your options. Don't assume that love will conquer all. It often doesn't. Love also operates with wisdom. You cannot entangle yourself in a relationship that will make you perpetually unhappy. Assuming she had a criminal record and in the course of your relationship has been in and out of jail, how would it make you feel if you were clean yourself? You need to think about the consequences of your decisions. Don't enter into a relationship hoping to change anyone. No one changes without personal effort. Remember, your happiness is a tough priority in achieving all your goals in life. If you are distressed and unhappy, you will like the zeal to push. Protect your happiness. You deserve peace of mind. 5. They don't define the things they wouldn't accept in a relationship. It is quite difficult today to see people who just met moving in together by the next week. Unlike in the past, people no longer spend time getting to know each other before they make up their mind. This is partly as a result of mainstream media which projects unrealistic relationship and one-night stands. People all over the world are beginning to replicate what they see on screens. What this means is that people don't spend a lot of time talking. Every man should communicate clearly to their partners what their goals are and what type of relationship they are looking for. If the man does not abide multiple partners, he should communicate this clearly. If the man does not accept premarital sex, he should communicate this clearly. Everything that both partners want and don't want should be communicated. If this doesn't happen, the tendency is for both partners to become dissatisfied with their relationship. This often ends with breakups. 6. They have a picture of the perfect woman. In the mind of some men, there is a perfect woman meant for them. In reality, there is no perfect woman or man. There are only perfect relationships. People who have such ideals usually date the same type of women over and over without results. The reason why it never works is quite simple. The woman's flaws always show up when they are least suspected and then the breakup with them. Don't enter into a relationship seeking the perfect woman. Be open to meeting good people who you can build something beautiful with. That way, the two of you can accommodate each other's flaws. 7. They haven't figured out what they want in life. One key thing you should know is that a man who doesn't have his life figured out can hardly add value to anyone. You will just appear unstable. When you are like this, the type of woman you will attract will also be people like you. When you are in this state, it is not even ideal for you to be dating. You may think you are in love, but what you need more is a retreat. You need to figure out what exactly you want to do. When you start doing it, then you can start thinking of dating but not before. 8. They feel they don't deserve a good woman. Some men have a bad past, they need some time and are trying to redeem what is left of their lives. Because of this, they can sometimes settle with any woman at all that accepts them. This is not a great move. You deserve love and affection. If you enter into a relationship with this mindset, the tendency is for the woman to think she is doing you a favor. This will ensure your unhappiness in the long run. 9. They don't love themselves enough. Every man must learn to love themselves. You cannot love another person the way you should if you don't love yourself. Nobody will treat you the way you don't permit yourself to be treated. A woman cannot abuse you if you don't have low self-esteem. Your partner can also not manipulate you if you are self-aware and very active in your work. They enter into a relationship when you are sure of yourself. You need to be whole before you can share with others. If you enter a relationship broken, you will just end up hurting yourself and your partner.


This is Witch Based News for Friday the 14th of July 2023 I'm CMDR Buur In Elite Dangerous News this week the Bucky Ball Racing Club are hosting a live racing event this weekend We've some awesome guides to Odyssey's on foot conflict zones Azimuth Biotech offers new pre-engineered weapons in this week's community goal and more As always if you enjoy our videos Please do hit the like button and if you haven't already be sure to subscribe and click the bell So you don't miss any of our Elite Dangerous content You can also join our patreon if you'd like to help directly support our work links to that and everything else are below We start this week with an advisory or a reminder in case you'd forgotten that if you own and operate a Fleet carrier and are in need of the Tritium wonder fuel used to drive and power the colossal mobile base of operations Then you don't have to source and ship it yourself the Tritium monkeys are a Tritium supply and refuelling community specifically geared around keeping commander owned uber vessels in the live game online and Mobile around the bubble and Colonia regions if you're in the bubble or Colonia and are looking for carrier Refuelling or a larger delivery of Tritium then for a fee the Tritium monkeys will attend and deliver Whatever you need the service uses a slick ticket based system via their discord server Which you'll find linked in the description below this video the Tritium monkeys are distinctly different from an emergency service Such as the fuel rats in that they are a populated space Tritium delivery service think of them as like uber eats But for Tritium if your carrier has exhausted its supply of Tritium and is stuck out in the black away from populated space Then you're not out of options there However, the ever resourceful elite dangerous community has of course a solution for that as well for deep space Tritium supply depots or emergency Tritium supply and rescue Then you need to call the strategic Tritium and rescue initiative or star for short The star initiative is an allegiance of carriers and commanders drawn from the fleet carrier owners club the deep space support Array the fuel rats and the hull seals tasked with maintaining and supplying carriers in need Outside of populated space you'll find their services as part of the fleet carrier owners club discord Which is again linked below this video In a unique break with their traditional week-long time trial style events The bucky ball racing club is this weekend running an informal live ship SLF and SRV race in Odyssey the event will feature a simple figure of eight race around the base of two Mountains on planet 5c of the wolf 1060 system the precise location of which is on screen now with ships Fighters and SRVs all participating in their own races all at the same time on the same track Beautiful madness the event will run on Saturday the 15th of July between 1500 and 1700 hours UTC with each heat Expected to last around eight minutes or so to get the full details and to participate yourself then head to the live Racing channel in the bucky ball racing clubs discord server a link to which you'll find at the bottom of the club's website Which is linked below this video I stumbled across two guides in Elite Dangerous Odyssey's on-foot portions this week that Absolutely answer all the questions you may have around on foot conflict zones and on foot PVP But were perhaps too afraid to ask Both guides were created after extensive research by commander Tocqueville of the elite on foot combat community Discord server and are incredibly detailed the guide to beginner warmongering covers every conceivable aspect of on foot conflict zones and detailing everything from how the zones work what tactics and equipment to use and what Rewards and effects you can expect from participation The PVP guide as you'd expect covers the player versus player option within combat zones how to deal with survivability Recommended builds on both suits and weapons time to kill ratios for various builds and even the relative projectile travel times Individually the two documents are incredibly useful and informative Collectively they are an awesome body of work an essential reading for both Experienced players and anyone thinking of jumping into PvE or PVP Conflict zones for the first time you'll find links to the guides themselves and the elite on foot combat community Discord server linked below The now definitely not evil and only just wants to help as a myth biotech is running a duo of community goals this weekend The rewards for which include Pre-engineered gimbled AX multi cannons the mega corporation under their previous administration Produced such hits as kidnapping forced human experimentation Attempted genocide and who can forget that timeless classic mass murder in a genius business move Azimuth having been the pivotal player in the initiation of the war with the Thargoids and now in the position to become the Galaxy's premier supplier of weapons to the entrenched galactic community to help fight that war Azimuth are planning on hosting a business convention that will feature guest representatives from research groups Manufacturing companies and military forces the soon-to-be Azicon will also serve as the commercial launch for the company's latest bug splattering hardware the auto loader gimbled AX multi cannon as the name suggests The new weapon is a pre-engineered version of the gimbled AX multi cannon that features the auto loader Experimental effect that gives a near seamless transition between magazines allowing for almost continuous fire The cannons also come pre-engineered with the overcharge modification Upping their available damage output at the cost of thermal load distributor draw and magazine size the dual headed CG features rare goods delivery and bounty hunting portions and there are medium and large versions of the new weapons up for grabs to the upper tier Participants in the goal. It's expected that the weapons will go on general sale at Azimuth outlets Shortly after the goal is concluded if you want to get involved in the community goal this week Then I've linked to the in our pages Summarizing the goals below in our can tell you what system to head to what rears to transport and where to obtain Those rears as always the CG's run until next Thursday unless their goals are met before Will you be racing live against other commanders in the bucky ball event this weekend? Are you considering jumping into Odyssey's on foot arenas for the first time or will you be looking to earn some new bug? Splatting guns in this week's community goal. Let us know in the comments below That's it for now. Thanks very much for watching. We'll be back later this week with more videos Until then oh seven commanders follow the greens on the way out and do keep clear of the toast rack We very much look forward to seeing you next time


Hey guys, how you doing? This is rich from rich TV live and today We're gonna talk to you about another company that we brought to you first. It's been a huge success and that is So come in minerals Here it is and Let's get right into it. Hope you're all having a great day and We're gonna go through the investor deck This is Socomin minerals Corp Targeting high-grade gold in Newfoundland with a dominant land position Right off the bat. We're gonna look at the share structure issue note standing a hundred ninety four million shares issue note standing 35.4 million warrants between five and forty cents stock options between eight and twenty two cents nine point three million fully diluted 238.7 million shares with a market cap of a hundred and forty six million now one of the reasons that this is so exciting is that Famous billionaire investor Eric Sprott has heavily invested into Socomin minerals 26.1% of the shares he owns and 15 million in cash That he's invested into Socomin minerals Gold projects Socomin owns and co-owns over a hundred fifty thousand hectares and these are zones Moosehead 100% owned fosterville type Silver sorry gold floors the lease 100% owned Dalradian type gold Crippleback Lake 100% owned orogenic gold golden hope 50 50 Benton resources joint venture orogenic gold and Gray River 50 50 with Benton resources joint venture intrusion hosted gold and Keppen Keck 50 50 with Benton resources, which we also brought you guys JV orogenic gold and East Alder option to Canterra minerals orogenic gold This is the Newfoundland gold exploration and properties as you can see all the different areas that they are focused on drilling and It's interesting because typically Eric Sprott is investing in silver, but in this instance, he's investing in gold So they've had some big recent updates at the flagship Moosehead project along the central Newfoundland gold belt 50,000 meter phase six is still ongoing and SIC Expects several batches of assay results out in the next few months So you can see all the areas of focus This company has been an absolute rocket We'll go through the chart in a little bit so the symbol in Canada is SIC the website is Socomon Minerals Corp.com and the symbol in America is SIC and F And I have interviewed the company when it was literally pennies and it's already been a 10-bagger Congratulations to investors and we're now revisiting it to give you guys an update Phase one till sampling has commenced at district scale Fleur de Lis project located in Northwestern Newfoundland will get into that as well and At the three newly acquired projects forming part of the 50 50 JV with Benton resources, which I showed you guys here Back to that see those 50 50 Benton resources JVs They are ongoing compilation is revealing additional prospecting targets Airborne surveys should commence with the next 30 days so a lot of exciting things for Socomon Minerals and In my opinion, you need to put them on your watch list and put them on your radar They've been absolute rockets and we do not like to miss out on rockets In fact here at Rich TV Live, we love to tell you to put your pocket the rocket in your pocket That is what we love to tell you to do here is put your pockets Fill them up with rockets fill your rockets with Fill your pockets with rockets and this is one of those potential rockets that everybody should have in their pocket In my opinion. Yes, Socomon Minerals That's right. Put them on your watch list. Put them on your radar. They've been an absolute rocket But this rocket in your pocket. It's been an absolute rocket We're gonna go through more of this Alright, hope it is everybody's having a great day. If you guys like these videos smash the like button Comment them below share the video everywhere and subscribe if you have a comment Please put it in the chat. I know it's Friday. I know a lot of you guys just Getting ready for the day. I know a lot of you getting ready for the weekend So just wanted to give you another pick for you guys to put on your radar and put on your watch list Hey, thank you for sharing your pics. If you guys ever have pics, please share them I love it when you guys share your pics so we get a better idea of what's going on in the marketplace All right, so let's go back to this So SIC moose head drilling diamond drilling in 2018 to 2020 completed five phases of drilling 23,378 meters 106 holes face six underway 13,088 completed as of May 5th, 2021 south pond and football splay zones emerging 37,000 meters remaining currently two rigs two more planned drilling highlights phase one discovery hole You can see what the returns were in phase two with the returns were in phase three With the returns were in phase four with the returns were and phase five Huge returns of gold visible gold That is really exciting Really really exciting It'll hear men minerals Corp, and that is symbol SIC in Canada and SIC and F in America. All right, so we just updated the data server