access to the banking services to those engaged in transactions in crypto assets. Some of the petitioners in the RIT petition who challenged the RBI circular were young high-tech entrepreneurs who had graduated from premier educational institutions of technology in the country. In its statement under challenge, the RBI claimed that technological innovations including those underlying virtual currencies had the potential to improve the efficiency and inclusiveness of the financial system. However, virtual currencies, also variously referred to as cryptocurrencies and crypto assets, raised concerns of consumer protection, market integrity and money laundering among several other issues. Reserve Bank has reportedly cautioned users, holders and traders of virtual currencies including bitcoins regarding various risks associated in dealing with such virtual currencies. In view of the associated risks, RBI decided with immediate effect to not to let the entities regulated by RBI to deal with or provide services to any individual or business entities dealing with or settling virtual currencies. RBI also directed the regulated entities which already were providing such services to exit the relationship within a specific period of time. The statement was then followed by the circular which I just mentioned earlier in my talk. In fact, Reserve Bank had repeatedly through its public notices, even in the past, in December 2013, February 2017 and December 2017, cautioned users, holders and traders of virtual currencies including bitcoins regarding various risks, diverse risks associated with dealing with such virtual currencies. In one of its reports in 2013, incidentally RBI had noted that globally the use of online and mobile technologies was driving the proliferation of virtual currencies and those developments were posing challenges in the form of regulatory, legal and operational risks. It defined virtual currency as a type of unregulated digital money issued and controlled by its originators, developers and used and accepted by members of a specific virtual community and it further noted then in 2013 that the regulators were studying the impact of online payment options and virtual currencies to determine the potential risks associated with these virtual currencies. In June 2014, the financial action task force, an intergovernmental organization established on the initiative of G7 nations highlighted through a report both legitimate users and potential risks associated with virtual currencies. The FATF report defined virtual currency as a digital representation of value that can be traded digitally and functioning as a medium of exchange and or a unit of account and or a store of value but not having a legal tender status, yes that's how they defined the virtual currency, the digital currency. The FATF report also defined cryptocurrency to mean a math based decentralized convertible virtual currency protected by cryptography by relying on public and private keys to transfer value from one person to another and signed cryptographically each time it got to be transferred, that's how they defined cryptocurrency. In June 2015 FATF came up with certain recommendations thereby advising countries to identify, assess and understand risks and to take action aimed at mitigating such risks. National authorities were asked to undertake a coordinated risk assessment of virtual currency products and services predominantly to address the issues to combat money laundering and financing of terrorism, that was the main concern of FATF. By a subsequent report in October 2015 FATF noted that virtual currencies had emerged and attracted investment in payment infrastructure built on their software protocols. These payment mechanisms seek to provide a new method for transmitting value over the internet and at the same time virtual currency payment products and services present money laundering and terrorism financing risks. The FATF made a preliminary assessment of these risks and developed a guidance focusing on the points of intersection that provide gateways to the regulated financial system, in particular convertible virtual currency exchanges.


Good evening everyone, how are you going? We've got here tonight, we've got Trivia Tuesdays, I'm with Reece Williams, myself, Tass, Miracudas, and a bit of fun on your Tuesday night doing your lockdown. Hello Wonders fans, nice to meet you and welcome to the Trivia Tuesday. It's good to have you all along and best of luck for the competition and we'll have a chat as well so welcome and thank you very much for coming on alone. Remember 30 seconds each question. What date was the creation of the Wonders officially announced? 17th of May 2012, 4th of April 2012, 25th of June 2012, or the 31st of May 2012? Got a couple foundation members on here I'd imagine so should be right up your ballpark. Seven seconds. Get them in guys, 4th of April. Whoa! Donna, rapid. Donna T, well done, good start. On to the next one. Which club did the Wonders score their first competitive goal against? Is it the Mariners, CNFC, Perth or Brisbane? First competitive goal, this one looks to be an easier one. Most people have got their answers in already. What would you have gone for Tass? Believe it's Brisbane. What would I have gone for? Oh there you go, it's all went right to the end. Yeah, beautiful. Well done again. Here's the leaderboard, top five. Jason, an eight highest climber. Who were the goal scorers in the Wonders very first semi-final appearance? Oh that looks quick. Is that everyone done? There we go. Look, you're forgiven for saying Mark Bridge. BD has a streak with three correct answers in a row. King Natter takes the lead, well done. King Natter, representing the young king. Very good, good and proud. How many Sydney Derbies have been played across all competitions? Difficult question. I can't wait for my first one. Very good. Eight. Very good, I've got that, it's a tough one. The Wonders hold the record for the most amount of competitive matches in the season. But how many matches did they play? Do you know how many you've played Tass in the season? How many have I played in one season? Do you know or not? Tough one. All over the ball there. All done to the eight of you, 44. Wilma's coming back. Wilma? Who did the Wonders play their first ever AFC Asian Champions League match against? Big teams on that list, but... Another day, look at that. Labanoha Lady, loud and proud. Wow, that was a quick one. Quick answer, yeah. Very good, all signed. Alex Meyer. BD stretching the lead, up four leases. Nino, Nino, Nino. Who did the Wonders face in their second FIFA Club World Cup match in 2014? Cruz Azul was a popular one. What country were they from that split? Anyone know? Who can tell us which country, Satifa from? Mexico. Algeria, yes, Satif. Morocco. Algeria. Algeria, very good. Cruz Azul, the Mexican one. Which Wonders scored the most goals in a single A-League season for the club? I also thought you'd be on that. If it's best goal, I might be up there, but I don't know about top scorer. That's the next one, isn't it? Must be the next one. Pivot and shoot, three on the trot. Right up into the top three. Making a comeback. I like that pivot and shoot, someone's another 9-8. Ah, it's just referencing Sandslap's derby goal. Beautiful. Ah, it's you, Patrick. Yep. Very good, mate. I wanted you in that top five. I appreciate that, Taz. Very good, mate. And Walmart clinging on to our top five spot. Very good, mate. Who was your only wanderer player to ever win the Joe Marsden battle? Jason and Nate. Highest climb, up six places. Well done. Nicole Romney. Coming up into that top five as well. Here we go. Vladimir Nikuta scored his first ALA goal against which club? Brisbane, Melbourne City, Sydney United or Perth Glory? How's the gift, by the way? A lot of passion. Look at that. Didn't even click your second goal. Who were they against? Melbourne City. Golekiewicz was scrambling. Very good. Pivot and shoot. You're on fire. Well done, mate. Get the extinguisher out, mate. Five to go. Five to play. Whoever didn't get that, by the way, don't come back. The wanderers recorded a five-nil win against which team last season? It's a good bromance. I hope that one isn't a gift. Mate, they don't stop doing that. Jesus Christ. Ah, yes. West United. That was a nice game, that one. How many goals did the wanderers score during this 2020-2021 season? Quite a few. Two seconds. Robert C. I thought that was Roberto Carlos. Jesus. I don't know, Robert. Five-minute. How many Academy products are in the wanderers squad so far this season? Only thing I'll give you is it's not one. So, whoever said one. Yep. Not bad, that. Ten from the Academy this year. Great Academy. Carl Robinson was born in Wichtown. A few people got Google up on this one. This is a tough one. For extra points, you have to tell me what that one says in blue. Pronounce it if you got it right. Head, highest climber. We've got one more question and Pippen shoots right at the top. PD, we need a big answer here, mate. Yep, it's coming. It's coming. You see Alex? What is the first three-game per-tec and first game at Bank West where he gets the same club? But which club was it? Loved an easy question that ended off. Laughing his way at a victory, perhaps. Patrick Newell. Unless someone's gone before me. Here he is. Well done, everyone. PD, third. Well done, PD. Thank you. Alex Meyers, second. Got in there. And the winner, who's winning throughout. Good to see Pippen shoot. Can we have a celebration, please? Well done. Just this. Well done, everyone. Thank you for joining. Well, guys, thank you very much for joining us tonight. You're wondrous fans. We're testing myself over a very nice evening. Thank you very much. Thanks a lot, guys. It's great seeing you all. Hope to see you soon.


How long will you play Captain Marvel 4? I don't know. Does anyone want me to do it again? America's sweetheart, Brie Larson is trending again today on Twitter because she said something for 11 seconds. Let's talk about it. Couple things right out of the gate. Number one, I don't care what Brie Larson has to say about anything. Number two, it's not because I don't like her, I actually think she's probably a very likable person. And she just interviews really poorly. Or things are taken out of context. Number trace.  Why? Probably because she's a hot blonde, probably because she was in one very popular movie that was very mediocre, very mid at best, Captain Marvel.  It's very weird, but that's where we're at. So why am I even talking about this? Very simple answer. I want the views. I want people to come here that actually see that I'm a normal person that's not an extremist. Picking one side or another when it comes to every facet of movies, there used to be a time when this was fun.  But hey, it's really easy to just quickly attack a person's character without knowing them. Speaking of which, let's talk about Brie Larson again. I don't want this to be full clickbait. I am going to talk about this video. Let's really break down what's happening here. This is going to be very fascinating. How long will you play Captain Marvel for? I don't know. Does anyone want me to do it again? Don't be so modest. I don't know. I really don't know. I don't have the answer to that. There is so little news here. It's remarkable, but don't worry. There will be hundreds of videos on this by people that genuinely pretend to care. Brie Larson is not sure if people want her to play the character again. She could have been being sarcastic. I don't know. It's really hard to gauge her because, like I said, she's just not very good at interviews. Or maybe it's because she's on YouTube and she's familiar with how people talk on this platform.  They'll play the victim card constantly saying that she hates all men because they took something out of context. Or she was just trying to be more inclusive, but it came out wrong. Or who cares? Brie Larson seems like the hot girl at the party who's introverted and doesn't really have a lot of interesting things to talk about, but she's trying. She's trying to fit in. I mean, that's just speculation on my part. I'm never invited to parties. Subscribe. I have nothing left to say about this. I'm a broken shell of a man, a lifeless husk of someone who once cared about talking about movies with passion. So yeah, desperate times, meet desperate measures. A grown-ass man talking about Brie Larson doing an interview for 11 seconds. How embarrassing. But since you're still here listening, I would encourage you to check out my channel. It's far more fun than this video. I do review movies in a passionate way. I don't talk about all the other stuff behind the scenes. Don't care about that. I look at the final product on the screen and I let you know what I thought about it. And that's it. Now if you excuse me, I have to get my face ready for what's going to be a very obnoxious overreaction to put in the thumbnail of this. Thanks again for watching the video. You can also find me on Twitch at twitch.tv slash Adam Does Movies, where I not only play games poorly, but I also once in a while edit the videos that are live and even film. So you get to see all the mistakes, all the bloopers, all the disaster that is me. I'm also on TikTok at Adam Does Movies. And if you really like what I'm doing, you can become a member on Patreon at patreon.com slash Adam Does Movies or right here via that YouTube join button. And just say, Adam, I appreciate the passion, appreciate the hobby. Here's a dollar or four. Keep it up.


How would you differentiate between equity and equality? Well, equality, we talk about, I don't know what the answer to that is. Equity. I think most people think it's just another word for equality, which it isn't, and that's what makes it so nefarious. Why did talk about equality suddenly get replaced with equity? And what exactly is equity? I'm going to address those questions after I show you a clip from Bill Marshall last night where he actually calls Bernie Sanders out for this and Asked him to define the difference between equality and equity, which he apparently can't do. You really just have to see this to believe it. After you check out this free coin offer from Noble Gold. Silver's appeal lies in its rarity and aesthetic worth, but its importance in today's economy and technology may surprise you. Silver is used in a wide variety of technological devices and renewable energy sources, like solar panels. That's why securing your financial future with a silver IRA from Noble Gold Investments is such a brilliant idea. This month, every qualifying IRA of $20,000 or higher comes with a magnificent silver eagle bullion coin. Visit noblegoldinvestments.com to learn more and make sure to let them know DroneTech sent you. You can go wrong with Noble Gold Investments. And remember, there's always risk in investment. And there are no guarantees of any kind. This word equity has come into the language in the last few years and before that we didn't hear it. Is Bernie Sanders okay? Does he need some water or something?  This word equity has come into the language in the last few years and before that we didn't hear it a lot. And I think a lot of people hear equity and they hear equality. It's the same word and it's not the same word and the same concept. So how would you differentiate between equity and equality? Well, equality, we talk about... I don't know what the answer to that is. Tell me to think of it. You know, equality is equality of opportunity. We live in a society, we want all people to have whatever color your skin is. Equity, I think, is more a guarantee of outcome. Is it not? Yeah, I think so. I think that's fine. Okay, so which side do you come down on? Equality. Equality. I just love the nervous laughter from the crowd. Because they're thinking exactly the same thing that we're all thinking. Bernie Sanders, of all people, should know the answer to this. In equity, the government decides outcomes. So if you're part of a group that the people in charge of the government find undesirable, well then you're going to be put at a disadvantage to other groups which they think need extra help. How could he not know that? Or is it just that everywhere else that Bernie Sanders goes, nobody ever asks him that question. And he wasn't prepared to answer it, honestly, in front of this crowd and then openly support it. Notice the silence from the crowd there at the end. So which side do you come down on? Equality. Yeah, okay. That's because all they've been hearing from the Democrats, the media, Hollywood and all of our institutions is that we should be striving for equity. Vice President Camilla Horace has been very open about the Biden administration's agenda to push equity instead of equality. He's talking about equity. Meaning the result will be everyone ends up being equal. Equity, which is everyone should end up in the same place. It has to be about a goal of saying everybody should end up in the same place and if we want people to be in an equal place, sometimes we have to take into account those disparities. President Biden and I have put equity at the center of all that we do. No, equality does not and has never meant that everybody gets the same things, only the same opportunity. No, we're not all supposed to end up in the same place and no, the government should not be separating people based on skin color, gender or any other intrinsic qualities and then manufacture outcomes, picking the winners and losers based on some hierarchy of oppression that they come up with. If that sounds like communism to you, that's because it is. Part of today's woke revolution, you need to study the part of revolutions where they spin out of control because the revolutionaries get so drunk on their own purifying elixir. They imagine they can reinvent the very nature of human beings. The problem with communism and with some very recent ideologies here at home is that they think you can change reality by screaming at it, that you can bend human nature by holding your breath, but that's the difference between reality and your mommy. Yesterday I asked chat GPT, are there any similarities between today's woke revolution and Chairman Mao's cultural revolution of the 1960s and I wrote back, how long do you have? Ordered his citizens to throw off the four old, old thinking, old culture, old customs and old habits.  And those who resisted were attacked by an army of purifiers called the Red Guard who went around the country putting dunce caps on people. Yeah, who didn't take to being a new kind of mortal being. A lot of pointing and shaming went on. Oh, and about a million dead. You're right again. I'm amazed that Bill Maher is actually the one bringing this into the mainstream. And I think that's largely based on the work that's been done by James Lindsay and Chris Rufo in particular who have really exposed that the so-called DEI trainings critical race theory and gender theory, which are all being injected into all of our institutions, has its roots in radical far-left Marxism and Communism. I've talked about this many times in past videos but you really can draw many parallels between the so-called Wolk movement in America and the Maoist Red Revolution in China. People like Chinese activists away way have come out and warned about this before and now even Bill Maher has caught on.  Whether this is a homegrown Communist revolution or it's been fomented through ideological subversion by our enemies, it doesn't really matter because at this point it's deeply entrenched in all of our institutions. The fact is, equity is a tenant of Communism and anti-American. Alright folks, that's all I have for that one. If you enjoyed it, please hit that like button, share, subscribe and continue the discussion in the comments. Thanks a lot. I'll see you all in the next one.


Hi everybody, we're back. This is Dave Vellante. I'm with Wikibon.org and this is theCUBE, Silicon Angles Continuous Production of VMworld 2013. This is our fourth year here. Year one and four have been at Moscone. We're in Las Vegas a couple of years ago. Rick Jackson was on earlier, locked in a 10 year deal with San Francisco and the Moscone. So we're very happy about that. And we've been unpacking VMware, it's transformation into the cloud, going beyond the core hypervisor, beyond vSphere into other management areas. But the key thing about VMware is it's got a large ecosystem. And the ecosystem players are critical to the continuous growth and development of the VMware platform. David West is here. He's the Senior Vice President of Worldwide Marketing at Commvault, who is part of that ecosystem, a specialist in data and data protection, archiving and getting value out of data. David, welcome to theCUBE. Thanks, thanks for having me, Dave. Our pleasure. So anyway, VMworld, we're here in our 10th year, 15 year old company, you've seen the evolution of VMware as this disruptive force in the industry. Talk about that a little bit and what it's meant to Commvault. Yeah, I have. I mean, I remember not too long ago, seven, eight years ago, meeting with VMware folks and they were saying, look, we see this is a journey. We're going to start by getting customers to consolidate for efficiency. And then we're going to move to the next phase of getting mission critical applications on a virtualized environment. And we see that as a massive transformation on how companies manage their data and information in a virtualized environment. And old approaches to new data and information management just can't keep up in the new modern infrastructure. Well, and I remember those discussions and there were a lot of skeptics. I had some skepticism and I'm sure you did too. You have to say VMware has done a great job of executing on that. Paul Moritz used to call it the software mainframe and those marketing guys made him stop. But I mean, essentially that's what they've built with commodity components. And of course, Commvault is known as a backup specialist.  You do a lot more than that. I want to get into that, but the whole data protection piece has changed dramatically because of virtualization. You've seen that evolve. So maybe talk about that a little bit and then we can get into some of the other areas that you guys are involved in. Yeah, sure. So backup and recovery in a virtualized environment, especially when you're putting mission critical applications on it looks very different. And it's not just applying a point level solution at solving a VM backup. It's having an application aware view and abstracting the storage layer with technologies that are leveraged from the storage layer to do snapshot management with application aware protection. And that has to be done in a completely different way than the old approaches. And I think that's what we're seeing today is companies that are putting their mission critical apps in a virtualized environment are looking for a way to get the SLAs that they need now that they've got massive amounts of applications all in on a server. Yeah, so that's a key piece of the business decision. It's okay, if I'm going to put this thing into, I'm going to virtualize it. First of all, I'm going to put a layer in. I got to make sure that I'm going to have the service level. So give me some examples, some proof points. How is Commvault sort of supporting that trend? Well, I mean, first of all, Commvault is probably best known for being a leader in the data protection space for backup and recovery. And that growth of Commvault is coming because the old approaches just don't work anymore. Now you'll layer on top of that virtualized environments and it just adds to the complexity. So what Commvault is doing is saying, look, let's start with making sure we understand the application and then tie into the storage layer underneath to make sure that we can do very fast performance. And so about 80% of our customers today are using Commvault to manage their virtualized environments. It's a huge trend we're seeing. So when you say manage their virtualized environments, can you be more specific? Like what kinds of things are they doing with Commvault in the platform? Well, so you probably saw last week we announced a new solution for addressing for VM sprawl. So many of our customers are starting with solving backup and recovery. They're moving to managing replication, archiving and compliance, but it goes beyond that. As VM has, virtualization has gotten predominant. Now they're worried about how do I handle the sprawl, for example. So Commvault's approach is, let me give a set of tools and solutions that address how do I make my virtualized environment a lot more efficient. Yeah, so the interesting thing to me about Commvault is you sit at the heart of what you do is data. And you've got a lot of data about the data. People call it metadata. Even New York Times writes about metadata now. Metadata has gone mainstream. So the frustration that people always have with backup is that it's, first of all, it's seen as insurance policy. It's always an afterthought, sort of bolted on. And it doesn't add, intrinsically, it doesn't add any direct business value. So how do you take the data that you have and the information about that data and get additional value out of it, whether it's for other use cases like archiving or how do you help people reduce copies or protect things off-site? Can you talk about that a little bit? Yeah, so I think you raised a good point. It is all about the data. And I think backup and recovery has gone from a back office operation to how do I take all my data under management and turn it into a business value, a business asset. So Commvault starts with the premise of you got to do it in a single platform. A single platform that does backup, archive, replication, search, and e-discovery. All through a single platform. And Sampana's been that for, since early days, right? Sampana stands for Singular Information Management. That's the SIM in Sampana. So yes, I mean that's fundamentally what we believe in. It starts with a single approach. I very efficiently move that data, no matter what the purpose is for, all within a single platform. And as I'm doing that and moving that data, I garner intelligence. I have the metadata, I understand the application, the created it, I understand about the files, I understand about the content inside of it. So it's not just about making sure I'm protected for disaster recovery, or I've got an archive for compliance. But how do I take that massive amount of protected data that's been sitting in retention copies and add that back to the lines of business for, you know, as a business asset that they can go and tap into and mine for information. So we're kind of turning it upside down. We're turning the whole paradigm shift from, I got a protected copy, to how do I take that protected copy that lives on multiple tiers of storage, and now feed that back into, you know, a healthcare environment, you know, the mobile workforce, your compliance teams, and give them that data, rather than go and deploying a separate product for, you know, compliance, or a separate product for archiving. Yeah, so everybody's big data crazy.    So you know this story well. And I feel as though the big data meme has flipped that bit, and has got people focused on data as an asset, more than a liability. So what you just said, first of all, are you seeing that, and how will Commvault capitalize on that? Yeah, so I mean, I think the whole big data trend is just, you know, driven a conversation around, wow, I've got this data, I've got this information, what can I do with it to make better decisions? So, you know, our view of it is, when you've got a backup copy in an archive, let's not lose sight of the fact that there's business value there, and it's living on, you know, multiple tiers of storage across lots of different hardware vendors, and off to tape and into the cloud. So with Commvault, since we understand where all that data is, where it lives, and we know what created it in the context, how do we then turn that back over as an asset through a set of APIs and interfaces, to mine it? That's big data. That's mining all that information across these tiers of storage, and I think what's different is people haven't historically thought about backup and archive copies as a source of big data.  You've got all this information, make it available, make it accessible with a set of interfaces. And you've got metadata that can help guide you. Okay, so. Well, not just metadata, we've got the metadata, but also we've got an engine that goes and creates, you know, an index of the data within the data. Yeah, and so because you know so much about the data, you know, when it was created, you know, who owns it, what applications it feeds, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera, you can actually do something with it as opposed to have to, what you described before is let's stick it in a box and figure out what we want to do with it as opposed to, okay, we know the characteristics of that data, now let's try to leverage it throughout the organization for different use cases. So you talked about the VMware sprawl, you know, the other problem is Copycreep, I call it. You know, there's copies everywhere around the organization. I'm sure you're seeing that as well. We estimated the other day that for every master copy, there's probably eight or 10 additional copies created. Do you see that as a challenge within the customer base? And as we're talking about here, can you help address that problem anyway? Right, yeah. So I think Copycreep is kind of one of the pillars of how we got into this business, right? When we looked at helping customers reduce their storage footprint, i.e. their costs and improve operations, it starts with a premise that says, stop creating silos or copies of the data. I don't need three backup vendors all creating their own silo of data and then another couple archive vendors creating its own stack of data. So our premise that got into business is to wipe all that out, start with a single platform and make real efficient copies that are deduplicated and that are super efficient on the backend. Which, you know, check that box. That's what got us into the game. Now we go back in to say, look, we've got data sitting out at the edge and a lot of data and it's becoming mission critical. We're seeing a lot of data moving. So we've introduced, you know, tools within the Sampana platform that go grab edge data and also move it into a very efficient copy to slow that Copycreep that you mentioned earlier. Yeah, so you talked earlier about sort of a set of APIs that people can use to get into your platform. So you've got the entries and exits there. Another big theme that's going on in the industry is openness, new platforms, new orchestration platforms like OpenStack. So what are you seeing there? And again, how do you capitalize on that? Yeah, so we talk about software defined data center. Really, it's about an intelligent set of software based solutions that can abstract the complex underneath to create efficiencies. And for us, what we're seeing is using a set of software based data management tools that then allow our customers to go in and create API sets to go grab that data. So openness for us is a set of APIs into our content store. So when we create these copies of data for backup archive replication that are in an efficient state, sit within what we call the content store. That's our backend repository. So we have created a set of tools that allow users and partners to tap into the content store through a set of APIs. So for example, you may have an application inside a homegrown application. You say, hey, look, I need to go and tap into that data to go grab healthcare images. So through a set of APIs, customers can then go in and say, based on this criteria or these set of policies, go and pull out that information from our archives. Do you see, or how do you see analytics as a policy-based information management has been around, at least in concept for a while, you guys have been doing it on a platform. As the amount of data grows and the complexity of the problem grows, do you see the day where you can actually use analytics to automate a lot of, and you may be doing some of this today, automate a lot of that policy management and decision-making so that the machines are actually taking care of it instead of humans to what degree are we there today and how far can we take it? Yeah, so absolutely, we believe that's where the market's going. From Commvault's perspective, our contribution to that is we have a very sophisticated policy engine. And based on rules and policies that the customer creates, we are able to go in and make things happen. So it could be move information across multi-vendor tiers on the back based on a set of criteria, and that could be for lowering storage costs or for migration strategies or test dev or replication between sites. So you create a policy, separate that layer from the storage, and then you can create some backend. We can also do, based on policies, which we consider our workflow set of tools where customers can have, based on AB parameters, they can go in and have a whole bunch of backend operations happen that used to be done in scripting that now happen in our software. So we really believe that the intelligence needs to be in the software, and it needs to be policy-driven, and it needs to understand the infrastructure from the storage layer to the server layer to the virtualized layer and the networking layer. Awesome, all right, my last question as we run out of time here is, what should we be watching for out of Commvault independent observers watching the company, kind of milestones you want to hit, things that you want to move the industry on, just break it down over the next, say, 12 to 18 months? Yeah, so Commvault, knock on wood, we've been on a great revenue track, and I think the customers appreciate the value proposition, and it starts with fixing broken backup, but looking beyond it to holistic data management approach. We're on a track to a billion dollars, we've stated that, that's where the company is going, we got a plan to get there. What are we doing in the marketplace? I think it is that transformation from your backup and archive being a afterthought back-end process, to how do we open up this repository and give business users the value that they need. You're going to see us push a lot harder in terms of marketing that message, I think we've got a great portfolio products today, but we're going to be driving a lot more users and partnerships to go then and tap into that data for business. So whether it's taking your mobile applications and giving users access to all that information, that's something we deliver today. So that shift from backup and archive to tapping into that data for business value and intelligence and insights. Yeah, there aren't a ton of billion dollar software companies, that's a huge milestone for a company like yours. You guys have been around long enough to earn the right to get into the enterprise, so congratulations on the success. You're good luck, thanks very much for coming to theCUBE. Thanks a lot. I keep it right there everybody, this is Dave Vellante, this is theCUBE right back live from VMworld 2013.


movie show here on Think Tech. I'm Jay Fidel. It's a five o'clock block on a given Wednesday. And that's George Kaysen. He's my co-host for the show. And we talk about movies here in the movie show. And today we're reviewing a movie called The Last Duel on cable. It's a very recent movie. It's a very good movie. It's got a really powerful cast. And the cast does a good job. And really Scott was the director. And George has some feelings about that. And it is a study of the 14th century. I mean, you did want to know about the 14th century, didn't you? It was an important century. In France it was. This is set in France in the 14th century. And it's right after the problem with the black plague. With the black plague in the, I guess, 1340 or so, 1345, it swept across Europe. And that included France. And they had no way of dealing with it. It killed half of Europe. It killed half of Europe. So this is after that. And our hero, let's call him Jean for this purpose, Matt Damon, who's an excellent actor, had lost his first wife to the plague. And that sort of sets the environment what happens now. So George, it's like 1455 or so. I make that 1355 or so. Where are we with this? Where are we in France? And where are we with the territories and the nobility involved here in the last duel? Well, not only did he lose his first wife, he lost a little son as well from the plague. Thank you. He lost his wife, which was his heir. So you have all these machinese that the British had taken over part of France. And they were battling, the French were battling the British to try to throw them back over the English Channel to get them out of there. So you have all these different noble players. Ben Afflecht is playing one of the the king's cousin who's in a very powerful position. And they've got Ben Afflecht with blonde hair. I didn't initially, I didn't recognize that it was Ben Afflecht because he's sort of lost weight and he's got blonde hair.  And he has a one of his close associates played by Alan, by Driver, Alan Driver, and driver, Adam driver, Adam driver. And he, he's, that's LaGrie. You know, that's Jacques LaGrie, right? Really mean. Yeah. And so mean, he's like to the point of pathological. Yeah. And then you have Jean de Courage, Courage, Courage. And that's Matt Damon. And he, he marries the daughter of another noble who had been like a traitor, had been siding with the British, but they didn't execute him. They, you know, they, they jailed him for a while. Yeah. And he had the mark of Canaan. They, they didn't like him. The French nobility didn't like him. They didn't trust him. Although he didn't, he wasn't executed because of his collaboration with the British. They treated him as low life. But he had a beautiful daughter, Marguerite. And, and he married the Marguerite off to, to the Matt Damon character, Jean de Courage, right? Married, married him off to him. And, and, and he promised him some, some, some special land, right? Of his as dowry, because in those days, everything was dowry. So not only are you going to get this beautiful wife, right? But he got, he got some land, but he wanted this one specific parcel that he really wanted. And what happened is that the King and, and his King's cousin ended up giving it to Jacques, Jacques de Crete, right? So, so, so it seems that, that Matt Damon's character had saved the driver's, driver's character in an earlier battle. And they had become close friends. But as Jacques was rose, you know, in the hierarchy, they started to get to be a rivalry. And then when he was given this piece of, this parcel, you know, big parcel that had been promised to, to Jean, that, and there was jealousy here because Adam Driver was not from nobility. He had just risen, you know, he was a squire and the, and Jean was a, was a knight, right? So there was this rivalry that developed, right? So thing is that the key thing to this whole thing is that Jacques ended up raping the wife. I mean, you're moving too fast. Okay, all right.  Matt Damon was relatively inocente, trying to do the right thing, trying to have a good life with this very pretty wife that he had, who was very accomplished. And his childhood friend was Jacques, and Jacques was pathological. And every time Jacques had a chance to screw Jean, he did.  He screwed him out of, ultimately out of his, almost out of his wife.  So it's really a story of competition, of unfair competition, of rampant politics in the French nobility and the French court in the middle of the 14th century. And, you know, from my point of view, it's a study of the society at the time. How important land was, how important the nobility and your lineage was, and how important the church was, the church was a big player in all of this. We knew that. And it's the calamitous 14th century by Barbara Tuckman, a history professor at Columbia, who wrote some fabulous history books. This was one of them, the calamitous 14th century. And we saw inside that century in this movie. So I like this movie so much, because we saw how they lived. We saw their homes accurate. You know, he kept looking for the tension to detail this movie.  The way the government worked, the way the nobility worked, the way the king worked. I mean, Ben Affleck's position, for example, he wasn't a particularly smart guy. He just happened to be in that lineage. And the king was not a smart guy at all. He was a teenager. He knew nothing. And it was hard for him to function, because he didn't have any experience or education or any inclination, I mean, any talent as king.    Would I like to live in the 14th century in France? Would I like to enjoy the Black Plague? Would I like being around people who are trying to take things from me and belittle me, marginalize me, undo my credibility? It was, in a funny way, it was like grade school or high school, where the kids are, you know, kind of a little mean, and nobody stops them. There was nobody to stop them.  And dueling was decided not by the talent of the individual involved in the duel, but by God's will. God spoke through you. If you were right, God would make you win. If you were wrong, God would make you lose. It was all, you know, from the church and it was all religious.  There's a lot of things that you could learn about the 14th century that are true, according to my reading of the Tuckman book and French history in general. But was the story true, George? Yes, it was a true story, basically very true story. And they filmed at actual castles. So the castles were all realistic, right? That was definitely true. And, you know, basically, to me, my view was a little different than yours. Jean was also a flawed character. There was some flaw now, because he had lost his first wife, and as his kid, he was obsessed with an heir, having an heir, he had to have an heir. So what he was making love to his wife, I mean, it wasn't very sensitive.  Well, what you're seeing it through the lens of the 20th, the 22nd century, 21st century, you're seeing it in romantic, in terms of romantic love. I think you have to give more credit for the fact that if he did not create an heir, if his wife did not provide him with an heir, he was that was the end of the line. Exactly. And he would lose his power. He would lose his wealth. He would lose his lands. He needed, absolutely needed to create an heir. So it was a job. You know, you and your wife had a job to do, and you had to get there in bed and do that job until she got pregnant. And if it was hard work, I mean, I guess it's hard work when you do it under pressure that way. And, you know, I could see somebody losing any level of romanticism in sex, which is required of you. And the thing is, they had a scene with his mayor, white mayor, especially that he had bought, right? And the stallion came into the pen and wanted to impregnate the mayor. And he got his stick, because he didn't want this stallion to impregnate. He wanted a finer stallion. So he started beating the black stallion off his mayor, right? And then he ended up hurting the mayor, you know, which they showed. So, you know. This is Mendelian, Mendelian heredity. It's they understood that you would get a better outcome if you bred two high value horses. And they knew enough to know that if you didn't do that, the line of the horses would diminish, the value of the horses. It was their perception of genetics, of heredity, of Mendelian heredity, that came, you know, much later. So that was a very interesting scene. God forbid the mayor should get pregnant by the wrong stallion. Yeah. Now, the thing is, where was I here? Yeah. So the thing is, yeah, but the church and the judges were asking Marguerite, the wife, do you take pleasure when you have sex with your husband? And she lied, because you could see on her face, she wasn't, it wasn't pleasurable for her. So the thing is, because they were trying to figure out whether it, I don't want to get the whether the gree had actually raped her, and, you know, whatever, right? So, so bottom line is she got pregnant, right? And we'll get into that too. I have some theories about that. So the thing is, they were asking and she lied because you could see when they were having sex that with John, she was not enjoying it at all. It was like, you know, and the church believed that only if a woman is has is gaining pleasure, is she going to get pregnant, right? So this, this all plays into this later in the movie, right? And it gets really, really interesting. So, so that, you know, you tell me when we should start talking about the rape, because there's some other issues. Okay, well, yeah, just discover a couple of other things. So there was a certain amount of military action. And the French were adventurers. And they had the English on on French soil. We forget that the French were fighting the English a lot. And the English came over from England to take pieces of France. These guys were both involved in it. You had a very interesting twist on how it worked, what the command relationships were in the army, what it meant to be the leader. And then battle itself were plenty of battle scenes there that that really made you wonder what kind of experience that was. You get in there and you swing that sword in every direction.   It was no fun being in the army. And somehow they got people to do that. So it begins to, you know, it begins to show you how life was. I mean, if you can see how things are going in the army, and why people are going to really near certain deaths in these battles, why? What was going on in that society that you would do that? What was going on to elevate certain individuals like John and Jacques to be to be leaders in the army? And by the way, John was a real hero in those battles. And Jacques was playing around. He was avoiding the risk. He was doing politics with the higher ups. So he avoided having to put his life on the line. You could hate the guy. He was really pathological. On the other hand, as you said, the relationship of husband and wife different. And in terms of old fashioned romance, you think of the French and you think of looking back with a movie made now back to the 14th century, and you could find romance in there. Hey, romance was different. The relationships, not only sex, but the whole relationship was different. You know, the wife had succumbed to the husband's will. He could tell her what to do, went to come, went to go and all that. And wives except Marguerite, you know, were not supposed to be educated very much. And they weren't supposed to know stuff and speak other languages. And she was special. She was really a class act, which made her attractive in a way, but also hard to manage. So the relationships of the husbands and the wife and the children and the people and the nobility, all different. And you try to find common denominators that you try to see it in terms of Ridley Scott's view of it through the lens of modern times. And it's hard to connect. What it does is it's teaching you that life in general, the society of this French community was different, way different. Now we enter Emil Zola and the human experiment. Now you have these guys. Jacques had always coveted Marguerite. He wanted her. He was always making eyes at her. And she was making eyes at him so that it was not simple. And all of a sudden, now he breaks into, by deception, he gets into her house when Jean is away on some visit to Paris or something. He gets in her house and, okay, this is the kernel of the movie. What happens? Before I get into the actual thing when he violated her, right? Jean's mother was a pretty hard woman. Harriet Walker, she played the role very well. She took all the servants and left Marguerite alone in that house, which sort of bugged me a little bit, right? Why did she do that? Now they had been married five years, Jean and Marguerite. She hadn't gotten pregnant. It was critical that she had to have an heir. She had to get pregnant and have a child so that eventually, when Jean goes back into battle, if he dies, she'll still have a place to live, right? The mother, right? If there's no heir, she's going to be in the street, right? It's always Marguerite, by the way. The two of them are in the street. Yeah, the two of them. They'll both be in the street. So my gut feeling, and this may be all totally wrong, that she set up that thing for Jacques to rape. And that's reinforced, Jean, by the fact that, and this is again a view of the 14th century, is before Jacques left on his military adventure that day, or before Jean left, he said to her, make sure to lock the door and make sure there's somebody with you, he said. And that opens up a whole kind of cultural point that reminds me of chastity belts. You know, women were always subject to this kind of rape, abuse, what have you, and they had to be locked up. They had to be protected. You couldn't leave them alone, because there were a lot of people that would take advantage of them. It was, after all, the 14th century. And so he says that, and you get very concerned when the mother leaves, leaves Marguerite alone in a castle, a way big castle, with no protection, no staff, nobody there to help her in case somebody got in. And Jacques knew that, okay, and he got in. And then he essentially had his way, according to the rendition, the first rendition, there's more than one rendition of what happened here. This is ultimately a legal movie, isn't it? Rashomon, what's his name? This was based on Akira Kurosawa, 1950 movie. This was a Japanese movie where there were three different views from the three different players. And that's what they did here. And that's one of my problems with this movie. It went too long. We'll talk about that too, because of this Rashomon style, right? The same scene three different times with slight variations, depending on whose view. So what were you saying, Jay? I've just lost my train of thought from him. Okay, so here we are. We're in the crucible. Jacques uses his manservant to gain by deception access through the castle. Marguerite opens the door. Now, Jean and Marguerite, who have winked and blinked at each other in the past, are alone in the castle. And Jacques can have his way for what happens. Well, he tells her he's in love with her, that he's obsessed with her, right? And she says, no, I'm married.  No, no, no, no, I'm married. I'm married to my husband. So he chases her up into the, and she runs into her bedroom so she can lock the door, but he's able to just push the door as she's locking it, right? And then he ravishes her. He rapes her, right? And, you know, obviously, it's a traumatic experience, but, you know, she was moaning. So maybe she was enjoying it.  She succumbs. She protests. I suppose, you know, in a court today, he would be found guilty of rape for sure, seeing that version of it. But ultimately, she succumbs. And then he says to her, don't tell anybody, I'm leaving now, and he left. End of that. But then it goes from there. She does, she cannot keep quiet. Yes. Jean gets back and she has to tell him. This is a horrible thing that happened. It violates every norm in the culture. She has to tell him, and he has to have, he has to require accountability from Jacques. And Jacques denies it.  And you saw that it was pretty much a rape. But now Jacques is denying all the bad things that Jacques has done to Jean over their lives together in this region of France in every way. Now he lies. And so we have honor. We have honor. Marguerite is going to back up her husband. And she says, I was raped.  John is in a state of outrage.  But it's not all that clear, right? Because we have the Rashomon repetition of what happened. And every time you see the scene, you see it over and over again, it seems to suggest that she went to the bedroom knowing that he would follow her. She went to the bedroom because that's where you make love. She went to the bedroom not to escape him but to invite him. And it's not at all clear that she was resisting. But tell us, how did that evolve? And where does it wind up for you? Did she or did she not agree? Did he or did he not rape her? Well, from Jacques' perception, he's telling the priests that he has sinned, you know, Catholics, you go to confession, and that he has committed adultery. He's not saying rape, he's saying adultery, that he slept with somebody else. So from his perception, she was a willing participant. You have that today too, you know? But from what I could see, initially, she was not a willing participant. She might have just, as you said, succumbed at the end. And maybe even enjoyed it, maybe a little bit, you know? Because her friends, you know, she had told them that Jacques is a practice, he's handsome, right? So there's that fine line. But yes, she was married. And that was, and at least he admitted it was adultery to the priest, right? Now, one of the things that really bothers me is the whole thing with God, and I'll get into that. We don't have that much time left. But, you know, that God would make the decision, whoever won that duel. And both of these guys, because of their, because of their arrogance and their egos, right? The church told Jacques, we can, you know, you have a better chance with us to get off, right? And with Jean, there were other options for him. But what he did is by having, forcing a duel, his margarite could have been burned at the stake if he lost that duel. But he didn't care. It was his ego. He thought he's going to win. Both ego maniacs, both of them. So both of them wanted a duel, when, you know, either one or the other was going to die. So they had this bad blood between them. And I guess Jacques really wanted his former friend to die so he could get margarite, you know? And Jean, it was his own. I wouldn't have gotten margarite. If she was found to lie, if she was found to lie, she would have been burned right there. At the stake. In the dueling ground. They wouldn't have wasted five minutes burning her at the stake, you know? You're right. You're right. So I forgot. So I think what's really interesting at this point in the evolution of the story is that she makes the charge. Jean makes the charge. The local Ben Affleck crowd, they, they're sympathetic to Jacques because Jacques has compromised and corrupted all of them. He's a corruptor. And the question is whether there will be a duel. Because duels in the 14th century in France were on the way out. It wasn't a productive experience. And the church was backing up Jacques. Jacques really had it wired politically. And Jean was having an uphill battle to insist on a duel. You're right. He had other options. He could have not dueled. He probably would have been very embarrassed, lost his honor. Because everybody knew, you know, there was at least an adultery here. Okay. So they go to the king. That adolescent king. And they try the case before the king. And it's interesting. The question before the king was not guilt or innocence. It's whether Jean's demand for a duel would be granted. Okay. He could have said no. But he said yes. Jean made a persuasive case that at least was an issue that would require Jacques to respond in a duel. And of course, everyone in the room said, well, God speaks through the duel. If Marguerite is innocent, then Jean will win the duel.  If Jean, you know, ends the duel to the death. If Jean doesn't win, then A, Marguerite gets burned because it means she's lied. And God has spoken and Jacques, you know, survives. Very interesting influence by the church, by the nobility, and this very strange legal proceeding in front of the king. Okay. And then we go to the final chapter. Because the king has said, yes, all right, you want a duel? Duel. And everybody shows up. And it was, I really loved this touch. It was in the wintertime. So the ground was covered with frost. It had snowed. You don't think of medieval France like that. You don't think of the 14th century, but they had, they had seasons. This happened to happen in the winter. Okay. Let's talk about the duel. What happens, George? Well, they get, they're on their horses, right, with their lances, right? And then one of them, I think Jean falls off his horse, or the horse has a problem. So then, then Jacques is the only one, and then Jean is able to get him off his horse. So then they're battling back and forth, right?  And that's when Jean takes charge, right?  And he says, no, no, I didn't rape her, right? So then Jean goes and takes the knife, his sword and slits Jacques's throat. And then Jacques is dead. And then they take his body and they hang him naked. And they drag his body and then they, you know, then put up his body upside down to show, you know, that he, he's the wrong, the wrong one, that God make the decision, thank God for Marguerite, that, that her husband won because otherwise she would have been burned at the stake. So that's, that's the final thing. And then, yeah, so, you know, that, that's how it, that's how it ends.  And I think that sort of impacted his ability to in the, in the battle. I mean, he, he knew he was guilty, you know, he, he was obsessed with Marguerite, obsession. He had all these other women. He had loads of women he could have sex with, but he was obsessed, was in love with this woman, right? So he knew he was wrong. So I think that's why he lost because subconsciously, he knew he was wrong.  And nutritional science, we get into that too. I, you know, nutritional and medical science will save you. And, you know, ultimately, like so many things over the confidence game, I agree with you, John was confident because he felt he was on the right. And if there were issues about whether Marguerite had succumbed, you know, to the rape, he didn't see that. He saw the way she presented it to him, which was, you know, when he had returned, she told him she accepted that. And so it became a matter of honor. And if it was a religious experience, it was also an experience of confidence. And I agree with you, the Jacques, who was a psychopath, he didn't really have the same kind of confidence, especially when he was unable to beat John in the first part of the duel. And I also thought it was interesting that all these guys were wearing, you know, metal, metal night, night's armor. Okay. And around their necks, they had this mesh, this, okay. And in the battles that we saw in the movie, as you're right, it's a long movie, a lot of material, you can see how they would kill their adversaries. The idea was to get a knife under that mesh and go for the throat. The mesh would stop a knife, but if you could get under it, they could win them. Okay. And that's exactly what happened in the duel, that he found a way to get under the armor. And he, it wasn't what happened. He killed them by stabbing them through the mesh, I think. Anyway, there's so much violence in the movies these days, that did not disappoint. There was plenty of violence there. And she watched it being chained. She had these foot cuffs on her legs. She couldn't run away. And she was on this big stand watching. And her life was equally in jeopardy. But I think, don't you agree that all of that experience, although it was a redemption, the success of honor and for that matter, religious, religious imprimatur, fact is the marriage was wrecked. Because she didn't like the fact that he took this position, put her life at risk. And he was a crazy bugger that he would do that to her. And although she lived, luckily, I think she was pretty ticked off at him, the marriage didn't work after that. Am I right? Yeah, he died six months later in battle. And she lived there for 30 years. And that's one of the feminist things. They showed her, she was a pretty smart manager of that castle. But she, in those days, she was property. She was his property. She wasn't the, I mean, women were property at that. So that was, he was protecting his property more than her honor. Right. And so, yeah, so she lived for 30 years later. And she was, she ran that castle for 30 years, never had another kid, but had that one kid who, from my gut feeling was driver's seat. Was that, that was not Sean's kid, it was, you know, Jacques's kid. But so she, yeah, that's, that's the whole, my major problem that they put made this as a feminist thing for today. But it was a different era. It was women were property. I mean, she was just one of these real smart cookies, right? Who was able to run that castle and that plantation for like 30 years on her own. But she was a rare, rare bird in those days. They were, Well, she did well. She came from a dishonored family. We didn't have great prospects. She was lucky to find Jean who had was landed and a night he was. And she came out of it, all this trouble. She came out of it pretty well with the castle, with a child, arguably a child would inherit the castle. So that was the way it worked in France. But I, you know, I asked you earlier, George, whether you would like to live in 14th century French, you know, 1350, 1360 like that. And I, I've, from this discussion, it's clear. I don't want to live there. I wouldn't go. I wouldn't go there. It was no fun. I would not want to live there. Definitely not. I mean, I would rather be in this age now where we're living with all the problems we have with everybody battling and killing each other. But, but we live in a better age with science, with sociology, the way we deal with each other, more like, you know, Pono Pono, they call it. I think, yeah, here, you know, much, much better time to be living in today than the 14th century in France. You know, yeah. Yeah, I was mostly structured around the royalty and the church, and you didn't have a whole lot of control over your life. That's what the message was. And I mean, it makes me want to go read Barbara Tuckman's book, The Distant Mirror, the calamitous 14th century again, this outstanding discussion that really helps to appreciate the movie. So what would you give this movie? The production values were terrific. The acting was absolutely great. These stars really showed us their stuff. The script writers really had done a lot of research. I know, you know, like the way really Scott handled the, you know, the women's rights issue, but gee whiz, this was a movie to teach you and to also get you involved in a very difficult experience historically. So what do you give it on a scale of 10? Given all the plus historical stuff, I would only give it an eight because I have some issues with this movie in terms of trying to make, put it in the current day, you know, directing that. So I would give it an eight. The acting was really excellent. The historical was excellent, but I'd give it an eight, not a nine or a 10. From my perspective, you may probably give it a better one. I would, I'd give it a nine. And if we were talking about fractions, I might give it a fraction more than nine. I really enjoyed the movie a lot. And mostly because of the historical nature, the quality of the acting and the challenges it presented because you didn't know for sure. It left you wondering, it left you interpreting. And I think that's probably the way it was in those days. So George, what about, what about our next movie? Got any ideas?   So if you want to, if you want to see, if you see something you like. I have, and I want to suggest it to you now in hopes that you will look at it. Cable movie again. They're all cable movies now. It's called The Last Day of Capitalism. Oh, okay. The Last Day of Capitalism and it is a very, very, very unusual and intense movie.  You love the, the colloquy, you love the script. It's very, it's riveting. Anyway, take a look at the last, the last day of capitalism. And we'll circle back in a couple of weeks, maybe examine that one. We'll do. Thank you, George. Thank you, George. George Kasin. Now, this is the movie show here on Think Tech. Thank you, George. Aloha. Aloha.


I just found out about an open casting call for Disney. I was on Instagram and I saw that a few different casting pages posted this. It looks like Disney is desperately looking for this boy. A project that's going to be initially released on Disney Plus. This was written by Jamie King and Utkarsh Anbudkar. They are looking for a South Asian boy who can play 12 years old and it's a bonus if they're musically inclined or can rap. It is a worldwide submission. The script is in English so you should be able to speak English. There's no information on the deadline, the location, who can or can't submit so you should submit until that page no longer exists. For the self-tape you will get the sides aka the script from Casted Talent and then you're going to perform a rap that they give you and a short scene that they give you. This is an example of what your framing should look like and this is an example of what your full body shot can look like.


Moving on to the news, Benway PDP youths have threatened legal action against party members involved in character assassination and blackmail campaigns ahead of the party's congresses later this year. The group led by Kamri Daniel Edoachei Atae for Benway South, Samson Acombo for Benway Northwest and Gundur Arbet for Benway North East made the disclosure at the press conference in Makodi. They warned those in trouble within the party to seek redress within the party and all aspirants and supporters to also respect the party and political leaders. I also visited Medusum in Telobas to interfere either inform a social media campaign on hate against any of our erudite and pragmatic leaders whether such persons are members of the PDP or not. We equally want to warn those aspiring for state party executive positions to wait until the party secretary gives the nod to do so. We advise that when the nod is given they must go about their campaigns with much regard and respect to our parties and political leaders. As whoever is found sponsoring hate campaign against our party and political leaders shall be made to face the penalty of infringement of our party constitution and the law of the federal republic of Nigeria as contained in the constitution. Our party is poised to come back to winning ways with explicit tragedy for the people and perfect blueprint for economic release and recovery for the people of Benway state and indeed Nigeria.


Alrighty, so we have quite the interesting video update today. This was super fun. For those of you that follow the channel know that we normally just do construction updates, rumors, and speculation for theme parks around the place, but I thought, and my friend I went with thought, why not go check out Ontario Place? It is abandoned. For those of you that don't know, it used to be a theme park of some sort on the Toronto Islands or right along the lakeshore. And it was really unique, especially to families in the area. It was a really well done theme park and it was extremely sad to see it go. It closed in 2011, I believe, I think it's crossed them right on that. 2011, right before Leviathan opened, and it still operates somewhat.  There's nothing open other than that big synom. And you can get some like, you know, refreshments along the way to and that's about it. But it's a really nice walking path and biking path as well. So as soon as in about like one more minute, you'll see it's gonna be clips of walking through there and kind of like raw reactions to things. It's super cool. A security guard approached us in a very friendly way and was like, yeah, you can go explore wherever. Like it's a very open park and we were shocked by that. I was really like, wait, are we allowed to film anywhere? Of course, it's an open park, go wherever as long as it's not caution taped off. So we didn't see anything caution taped off. So this was like really cool that we just got to walk around and explore. And it was just like bringing me back to my childhood. Anyways, the video is about to start and you're going to really enjoy this footage. This is so cool. And I definitely want to get back there sometime soon and get some more footage. It is really cool. You guys got to go check it out. Definitely abide by the rules though. Don't do anything sketch. Don't go into the construction zones or anyways. Hopefully enjoy the video. Give the video a like, subscribe if you haven't. Have a good one guys. Bye. Yeah, that's like the unloading or loading. I'm going to go over here because there's theming. That's not theming. I don't know what that is. It almost looks like they're going to like, it looks like they will. I can't believe they said we could just go wherever we want. This used to be filled with water, I think. Yeah. It looks like that, doesn't it? Yo, Wonderland, come pick this up. Hey, Wright, water used to flow out of this. Here's the queue line if you want to go into it. Oh, there's mosquitoes everywhere. You can go up that staircase. Staff, aren't we? That's... Imagine being that minimum wage employee sitting up here. Putting this as the loading to the station. It's right there. That's a little weird. So I know what the way is. I can hear it moving when you know blood by the end of this trip. Sony mosquitoes. It's just incredible that the rockwork is in better shape than even Wonder Mountain. Like they must have hired a way better company. Wow, the log ride went down there. How did it... This looks like head chopper galore. No, because remember, we're resistant on like a meter of gravel. True. Oh, this is sick. I can't believe like they let people in here.  I'm gonna have no blood. High definition. Well, there's decaying. Be careful. I want a canyon on steroids. Yeah, you're right. It's just amazing how this rockwork has maintained itself.  Metal objects too. Yo, that's like a cap for a footer, right? Yeah. Yeah, everything seems to still work here. There's an old silk city sign. Oh, wow.


Marriage can be such a great source of happiness and satisfaction but for some people it's a great source of sorrow and disappointment. There's an attack on marriage in our culture. The devil launches his assault to destroy marriage because marriage is the foundation of a good family, which is the foundation of a great society. So many people try to even redefine marriage what marriage means. We are so excited as Hungry Jin to announce that this coming February we're going to have a marriage conference, February 9th and 10th. In this marriage conference we will have Pastors Ilya and Mariana open on Friday night. As well we're going to have guests, authors Jeff and Shanti fell on. Some of you have seen Shanti's books for men only or for women only. They've been sold over 2 million copies and translated in 23 languages and she is this research-based author who teaches insights on marriage that are backed up with research and I believe that the Lord's gonna use this conference to impact your marriage. I will also be speaking on Saturday night and on Sunday morning Jeff and Shanti will be sharing to the local congregation as well about the topic of marriage. It's very crucial and important to invest in your marriage. Good marriages they never happen by accident. It's two people that are willing to invest into their marriage and this conference is not going to be free so we challenge you to invest in your marriage by attending this conference and we invite you and we can't wait to see you there. So reserve your spot at this marriage conference.  We would love to see you here at this marriage conference so that struggling marriages will become successful marriages and successful marriages could become even better marriages for the glory of God.