Y kniff charitywyr yn gweithio ar gyfer nhw ddig sydd yn dweud am info gerdus i gyff appreh overwhelming y完成 y llifon Gold. eich yraedd amddawid b 초esio aganddur o bron Стegwr wedi'w ddig guns yn dd companion. Ar drys i gyfer sydd yn gweithio ar gyfer nhw ddig ledg y Gweithring elementolol sydd wedi eu suchy maeN awesinciraviol yn seuchau gystadast. Mae gyrch honna ar gwaith yn gweld gwmishydd fwrdd sweetoedd y gaf пом Cruz. Group Head of Committees and Outreach, David McGill, Assistant Chief Executive, and Vicky McSherry, Culture of Respect Team Leader for the Scottish Parliament. I thank you very much for joining us this morning. I am going to start off asking some questions about the action plan and I wonder if you can tell the committee when the final action plan will be published and what the implementation will look like. At the moment, we have set up a joint working group. The three of us are on this with representatives of all of the political parties. We will be talking to them about how we are going to implement a more detailed action plan. We set out the broad thrust of what we want to do in our next steps document. Vicky probably would like to say a bit more just about some of the detail because we are looking at some priority areas that we want to take forward. We set out the next steps that we published. We have set out an outline timescales, if you like, and that was agreed by the last meeting of the working group. We have set out the priorities. One of the main priorities that we are looking at to deal with first of all is the reporting procedures because it is really important, obviously, that we tackle that first. Before we get to reviewing the actual procedures, we want to take a wee bit of time to gather more information from people who work in the building. One of the first things that we are going to do is hold focus groups. We are going to invite people to come along to them so that we can get further qualitative information from them on what they want to see the reporting procedures to look like. We will then take that forward a wee bit further in terms of looking at what our policies are like. We have broad timescales in place, priorities in place, and then, from the top of my head, what are the timelines looking like in several months? We want to take the time to get it right. We have training outlined in that, which will take us up to later in the year. Can I ask you some specific questions about the working group? How regularly is the working group meeting? We are set up to meet every fortnight, although we cancelled the meeting this week, but we are meeting regularly on Wednesday morning. We also want to be very transparent about everything that happens. We have a page on our website where we publish the minutes and the agendas and the papers from the meetings. You, Vicky, spoke about focus groups. Are those going to be open to all pass holders? Are they going to be by invitation? How is that going to work? They will be open to all pass holders. We will put a call out for people who are particularly interested, who want to come along, who want to input to our next steps on what the procedures are going to look like. Can I ask a little bit about how the action plan is going to address the underreporting and the survey results said that the most common response to experience sexual harassment or sexist behaviour was to do nothing? I think that was 45 per cent of the respondents gave that as what happened. How do you foresee tackling that particular issue? One of the things that we are hoping is the fact that we have put that this is in the spotlight and that we are doing a lot of work, particularly around what we are making a public declaration of what is acceptable, what is not acceptable behaviour, so that people hopefully realise that something that they might have dismissed as banter in the past is something that is not acceptable and will be treated seriously. A lot of what we are hoping to do through the training is about prevention, about making people realise the impact that their behaviour can have on other people. Our reporting mechanisms will be one way of doing this, but what we are hoping is that, by creating this culture, we have zero tolerance and we will explore exactly what that means in practice. People will feel from that that they can have the confidence to come forward and that things will be taken seriously. As you were saying, looking at the results, there was a large number of people who did not think that something was serious enough to report. I think that this is something that we need to try and get across that people perhaps in the past have put up with things, thought that something was banter, thought that something should just be put up with, but if we send out a clear message that that is not acceptable, we hope that that will help with that. I am backtracking a little bit here in terms of focus groups. How are you going to invite or encourage staff who are based in constituency offices to be able to participate in that? Members come from right across the whole of Scotland and it is perhaps not as easy for them to travel. Have you looked at other ways of engaging with them perhaps through teleconferencing? That is absolutely something that we will be looking at. It is also something that follows through as well as the training. When we start our training programme, that training is for all as well. That is also for people who are based all around the country. We need to look at ways in which we can deliver that training and focus groups so that we can ensure that everyone who wants to take part in that can do so. We will be looking at lots of different formats for that. Thank you very much, convener. You have covered one of the points that I was going to ask about the constituencies. Obviously, you are inviting people who might want to get involved, but how will you ensure that they are representative of all the different uses of this building? Lots of people in different roles, different times that they work, so how will you ensure that we get a good cross-section of the people who work here? Because people are self-selecting, it will not necessarily be that people who attend will be proportionate to the people who work here. Obviously, people have had the opportunity through the survey to give their views through that, so we have a lot of really good information from that anyway. That is, I suppose, taking it about to the next level with potentially people who have experienced sexual harassment. That is giving them an opportunity and a confidential environment to maybe give a bit more information on what we would encourage them to report. It is not necessarily—because people are self-selecting—it is not necessarily going to be representative of everyone who works here. Okay, thank you. Patrick. Thanks. Good morning. I just wanted to explore the underreporting issue a little more and in particular try to get a sense of what the survey results tell you about the potentially different reasons—reasons that perhaps might be in tension even between different motivations for underreporting or causes of underreporting. One of the examples that we have discussed is whether, for some people, the idea that if they make a complaint, it will be ignored or treated trivially or not taken seriously is a reason for underreporting. Perhaps for other reasons—for other people who are in different circumstances—they might not report something because they fear that it would be taken seriously and become a big issue and perhaps become publicly known about or more widely among their colleagues. The action plan, if it is going to respond to underreporting, needs to get a sense of what those different factors might be. Have you got anything to say about what those range of reasons might be and that tension between treating something too seriously and not seriously enough? I mean, you make a very good point and just come back to what Vicki was saying about the focus groups. That's why some of the focus groups will want to look at particularly people in the survey because those who had experienced sexual harassment or sexist behaviour were least likely to say that they thought that they could report things. I would like to use those focus groups to explore that a bit further because, as you say, there can be many reasons that people don't want to report. The highest percentage was that people thought that it might have a negative consequence on their careers. As you say, you have the spectrum from somebody thinking that it's not going to be taken seriously enough to somebody thinking that it's going to be taken so seriously that there are going to be repercussions for them. It's just trying to dig a bit deeper. Obviously, we had some comments through the survey, but we really wanted to dig a bit deeper, particularly with people who feel that they've experienced it and what they felt the barrier was for them not coming forward. Another issue that came out quite strongly from the survey was people's need for confidentiality. Is there anything to suggest that the reasons for underreporting or the causes of underreporting might be different in relation to MSPs than complaints about members of SPCB staff? Obviously, as a committee, we're responsible for the code of conduct and a lot of those issues that don't apply to SPCB staff, but I think that there's a general mood that we want to achieve the same standard of response to the issue of sexual harassment in relation to MSPs and we're aware that that's a substantial number of the people who've responded to the survey have talked about behaviour by MSPs. Is that a distinctive issue in terms of the reasons why somebody might not report issues around party loyalty or issues around whether something goes into the public domain? I think that from the survey results themselves, it's difficult to say that there is something distinct. Looking at the figures, a lot of things seem to be common across a number of categories of respondents, but that would be another reason why I would like to look at this in the focus groups to see if there are particularly some different issues. Again, going back to what I was saying earlier on about confidentiality, wherever people work within the building, they know that this is a place that is under the media spotlight. Yes, I think that some people will be worried that although their name will not be mentioned, there will be a spotlight on them and sometimes that can have an impact on whether people want to come forward or not. I think that the suggestion about getting what's been described as a standalone global policy on sexual harassment is something that applies throughout the building. Have you identified any barriers to including MSPs within that? Obviously, that's something that the committee has discussed and there are some complexities that arise from that. It's something that we're looking at very carefully. We're aware that the Westminster Parliament has decided to produce a code of behaviour for Parliament, so that would apply to not just people who work in the building but to people who visit the building. They've termed it that everybody who engages with the parliamentary community, and that's something that we're very interested in. We think that it would provide that absolute focus at the top level. There's no reason that we can see that something similar here couldn't be used as the highest-level strategic approach to harassment and bullying for everybody who works in the building, including members. What we can't do, though, is provide a single source that goes beyond that. That would be the statement that would guide the different strands of reporting and sanctions through the appropriate mechanisms that we have in places now, but it would provide that overall focus at something that we're keen to look at. The suggestion would be that, once that's in place, it complies with it as part of the code of conduct for MSPs. Yes, that's the way that we would see that happening. The survey identified that there was a culture or an atmosphere about individuals not feeling comfortable coming forward and it was discouraging them, they felt, from making the initial impact. How are we going to try and manage that situation? What can we do to monitor and what can we do to provide assurances to people that that whole culture that we seem to have needs to be addressed, and how will you manage that? As David was saying, we will hopefully look at something that is an overarching statement, if you want to call it that. That is something that is akin to behaviour that is acceptable and not acceptable. What we are hoping with that is that that sends a message out to people about what will be tolerated and what will not be tolerated. The kind of culture that we want to work within. When we looked at the survey results, what was most disappointing to me was the number of people who felt that they did not have confidence in being able to come forward. That would be a variety of things. One of the things that we've talked about is that we've got so many different lines of reporting that we want to make sure that we make that as simple as we can, but with the caveats that David mentioned. The main thing is that this culture shift is to say to people, no, we want to work in a place where people are valued, where people are respected, those are the values of the institution, those are the values that we expect everyone to adhere to, and that means that if you experience anything where you are not treated in that way, that will take that seriously. It's about engaging with the confidence within the authorities that we have within this Parliament to ensure that everything will be taken seriously, that everyone will be treated correctly. That is also a problem. Some people feel that they are frightened of the consequences, they are frightened of the potential publicity because of this environment. It's not a normal working environment where we are under the spotlight much more. Trying to manage that confidence will be very difficult for you to get that across. Monitoring that on a six-month or a year basis might be the way of managing that. Is that your plan? What we would like to do is because we want to see things shifting, we want to see things changing. Part of what we want to do is to look at how best we monitor that, whether it's in a year's time that we ask people what their experience has been. Ironically, it might be that we have perhaps some more people having reported because they feel more able to report, but we want to be able to make sure that the policies that we have put in place have made a difference. You touched on that Westminster is introducing any other areas that were looked at and other parliaments or other facilities that do something slightly different that might try to break down that barrier? We have looked across the piece and we have an external expert who helps us with our working group. Our impression is that there is not an awful lot out there that we can draw on. We are quite a unique organisation, so a lot of the things that we have seen are a lot of the things that we are trying to do. To be perfectly frank, I think that everybody is grappling with this at the moment. I do not think that anybody has the answers, but I think that the fact that everyone is actually trying to address that is something positive. It might help if I said that there was a piece of work that we kicked off before the publicity around sexual harassment. Anyway, we are looking at organisational culture, and we do recognise that culture change is extremely difficult and takes a long period of time. However, the challenge for us is to get away from just trying to capture bold statements and really deliver that environment that they all want to work in. What we have been doing here is, alongside refreshing our organisational values, we have been trying to establish the standards of behaviours that underpin all of that so that all members of staff and all members of staff who are managers know what standards of behaviours are required and accepted of them. If we go down the route of having an overall behaviour code or something similar like that, that is something that we can use with the induction of MSPs after elections. We can use it to support members when they are recruiting their staff, so it becomes a practical document, not just a bold statement, and that is how we see the culture and the environment changing over time. Thank you, convener. Thanks, convener. Can I follow up on that before I ask you something else, please? Does that mean that MSP staff, who are office managers, who have got a sort of managing people role, as well as MSPs, would be included in the specific training that would take place? We are looking at covering all categories of people who work in the building and contribute to our culture. Sometimes the idea of small teams can also be a factor that maybe stops people reporting things as well. Could I ask you about the posters that have been around the building? Obviously, if you think about things like change, you will see posters that say on change that we will not tolerate abuse of our staff and they are everywhere. The posters that are around the building, where exactly are they? Are they in public areas as well? Should they be in areas such as the committee room, for example, where the public is coming as well? Should those posters be more widely around the building? As far as I am aware, they are in some of the public areas, probably more so, not in the public areas, but there are some in that side of the building. There are all the lifts and all the public toilets, as well as the spaces that are not open to the public. Has it been helpful that you get feedback on that? I suppose that builds on what Susan Duffie was saying about drawing people's attention to what is and is not appropriate behaviour and making sure that there is a cultural change and an educational change. Are those posters having an impact? I can only talk anecdotally. I did have a visitor in here one day and I was taking them up in the lift and he noticed the poster and he said, I really like that poster, I love the fact that you have got a message on that that the victim is not to blame. He was very struck by it, so I do not know if anybody else has any feedback about the poster. There is a bit of feedback through the survey as well. If it is raising awareness, then it is doing a big part of its job, and it is getting the telephone number out there again, it is doing a big part of its job. Obviously, the posters were one of the first things that we did, so that is only the beginning of raising the awareness overall. I think that the posters are quite bold in the statement that they make, which is obviously sexual harassment has no place at the Parliament. Are you confident that the action plan is going to make that sentiment a reality? That is certainly our intention, because we talk a lot about this and zero tolerance. The thing that we need to do with all of this is to understand what that means in practice and to be very clear about what that means in practice. Everything that we do flows from that so that it is not just words on a poster that we take through with all of the actions that we take. Thanks. Jamie, did you want to end here? Yes, it was just a very, very quick one. Obviously, we have just been talking about the posters, but can I just confirm that there is information on the website too, so that somebody who has come in and visited the Parliament may be either seen or been involved in an incident. They can go to the website, and that is clearly available on the website. It is open to people who do not work here on the internet pages. It is, okay. Thank you. Thank you, convener, and good morning to the panel. One of the huge challenges is maintaining the anonymity of one who wishes to make a complaint, and recent events have illustrated how challenging that can be. I would just like to hear any comments about what can be done to protect the anonymity of people who wish to come forward. Clearly, that is a huge issue, which can certainly have a negative impact and put in allowing people to make that decision to come forward. You are absolutely right. That is probably quite a big factor in people choosing not to report. For us, I suppose, it is around instilling that confidence in people. When we are looking at the processes that we are going to put in place, absolutely confidentiality is at the top of the list. To a certain extent, as it is now, but it is really about instilling that confidence in people that the whole process is tight, and I do not think that we can guarantee anonymity when we are dealing with formal complaints, but that is certainly something that we need to look at when we are drawing those processes up. That is one of the issues that we grapple with. Obviously, you have confidentiality, but then, as Vicky was saying, there is anonymity as well. It is how you balance all of that, because you have got to make sure that the process is fair to everyone as well. I know that this will certainly be something that we will be looking at going forward, because it is not easy. I think that we will be looking across the piece to see whether there are other systems that have some kind of system of anonymity and how we would take that forward. There is always a danger that it attends any high-profile case that media coverage can potentially compromise or be perceived to compromise the integrity of the process. How do you work to mitigate that risk? Again, it comes back to confidentiality for us, and I am not commenting on things that we will investigate issues on a confidential basis. As has been said before, we work in a unique environment where there is a media spotlight. Certainly, when we are ever dealing with issues like that, we deal with them on a confidential basis. Our dignity work policy, which covers the staff of the Parliament and contractors at work here, is very people-centred, and that is something that we take as extremely important in the process. We also note that the Westminster report, when it discusses the various reporting strands that can come out of complaints, says that those should be progressed with respect to the wishes of the complainant. That is something that we are taking very close cognisance of. All of our policies at the moment are built on that basis, but the refreshing process that we will be doing will be having that as one of its key priorities. The prospect of having an external independent figure who can investigate and report on sexual misconduct. In your views, what are the pros and cons of that? In particular, do you think that that would encourage people to report more or less? In terms of the first part of your question, the pros and cons, when the pros are probably easier to look at, it would take away any sort of suggestion that complaints were simply managed out of the system, that there was undue influence brought to bear by a particular party who had an interest in the outcome of a complaint. That might be one kind of pro that people will be looking for. In terms of cons, that would possibly create another layer of bureaucracy. We would possibly lose something in terms of the relations that we have in the Parliament and we will all work closely together. We know each other, we know each other's motivations, that kind of thing. In terms of reporting, I would only be guessing about whether I would say that an independent process would bring greater confidence and lead to greater reports, greater numbers of reports being lodged that I would not know until that was put in place. Moving on then, in terms of the actual survey, did the survey report or look at whether complainers were satisfied with the outcome and the resolution of their complaints? Are you aware of any specific dissatisfaction that people have noted with their experiences? Sorry, I have the survey tagged in various places. We would ask for reasons for people not reporting incidents. We also gave a free text box at the end, so we weren't specifically asking people if they were satisfied with the outcome of a process that had taken place, but some of the comments that came through would perhaps be because somebody had had an experience and it hadn't been a good experience. However, that is one of the things that we want to find out with the focus groups. Again, it's kind of delving deeper because there were a lot of questions that we wanted to try and ask for the survey, but we also wanted to make it relatively manageable. It's one of the things that we want to try and ask people from the focus groups, particularly those who feel that they might have gone through the process, what outcome did they want and what outcome did they get and would that have an impact on whether they would report or not in the future, so that we can try and get a bit more detail about that. I can just come in on the back of Kate's first question regarding an external investigator. It complements my previous question about anonymity or confidentiality, independence of process. This is about someone who makes a complaint having confidence in the system. I just wonder in terms of what role, while I appreciate that it's not within your remit and it's for Parliament, but what role, sanctions and confidence in what the consequences could be for someone who perpetrates an act of sexual misconduct. There isn't a clear path or journey necessarily of a clear sense of what the outcome could be. How important do you think addressing that point is to enabling and giving confidence to people to come forward and make a complaint? Again, it comes back to keeping the complainant at the centre of the process. If your question was about setting out a range of sanctions in advance, I'm not sure that that would be entirely compatible with keeping the person's wishes paramount through the complaint process. We would also need to be careful that this element of independence that we're talking about would be very much at the investigation stage and that reports would still have to come into the appropriate body determined by the employment relationship. Those different bodies would have different policies and procedures in place, some of which may include sanctions and some of which may not. We have noted that Westminster, the suggestion is that the commissioner there has given a new range of lower-level sanctions that she can impose, which include things such as requesting an apology from the person who perpetrated the behaviour or requiring that person to go on training before the complaint would come back in for more serious issues to be dealt with, again internally by the standards committee down there and ultimately by the chamber of Westminster. Do you think that a scenario where an MSP can admit to sexual misconduct or sexual harassment and can continue to work in the Scottish Parliament building? Do you think that that will hinder people coming forward to make a complaint? I think that there's every chance that that would be the case. I think that you're asking us to make a value judgment here, which is probably not appropriate for us to make, but that would be a danger that we would be taking into account when we are looking at policies and when we are speaking to people about what those policies should provide. Not to make a value judgment, but would that constitute good policy or good practice in any other organisation, in your opinion? I think that, as we said, there's a lot of different employment relationships within here in terms of our staff. We have got a clear policy, we've got a policy, we've got sanctions and the ultimate sanction can be dismissed from this. Other categories of people who work here are not in that same situation. Do you think that that inconsistency is problematic? I think that when we came here that the first time, we said that there were a number of complexities around the different reporting mechanisms, but that there were reasons for some of those complexities because there is a different relationship. It's like, who is the employer? Because ultimately in terms of sanctions, who is the employer? Who is in the position to be able to put sanctions on someone? I simply ask because I appreciate that you have to operate within a restrictive framework. Ultimately, the powers and provisions that this committee holds in terms of making recommendations, and ultimately the Parliament has decided that. To follow up on that a little bit, clearly not every complaint, not even every upheld complaint would result in dismissal. That's a very serious step to take, but I would hope that you can at least tell us that the focus groups that you're going to have will discuss with people and try to understand what expectations people would have of whether MSPs in principle should be capable of being held to the same standard as members of SPCB staff in those very serious circumstances. Do you intend to have a discussion within those focus groups about whether that option should exist and, if so, how it would be exercised in order to minimise the additional stress that would come from a high profile or even politicised decision making process? Within the focus groups, what we were talking about earlier on is that there is one issue about the standard that we will all be held to. Obviously, what you are then talking about are the different types of sanctions on different people. We haven't specifically thought about including that in the focus groups. One of the things that we are very conscious of is the work that we are doing with the joint working group, which is obviously the committee's inquiry and any findings that you might have, particularly in relation to the code of conduct. We want to be able to take account of that in any of the work that we are doing, so that everything basically gels together. That single standard that you mentioned has to be the aim. If we are serious about looking at that from the point of view of the person who is on the receiving end of inappropriate behaviour and the impact on those individuals, the impact is the same regardless of who the perpetrator is.  That is helpful. I was just trying to ask the question in a way that keeps it very general and does not make it difficult to answer. If what you are aiming for is something that ends the situation where MSPs have a unique level of protection from consequences, the next step is to discuss how that can be reached. The difference comes in at the stage of the imposition of sanctions. That has to be a different process, but we recognise that. Folling on from that, we have touched on the idea of a member who has admitted misconduct and is still allowed to be in the premises. What is the Parliament doing in measures to protect the victim and also to monitor any further misconduct under that circumstance? That is a live situation. In a situation like that, we would use our usual informal channels. We do not necessarily need to have a process that is applied here. As I mentioned earlier, we work closely together with members, we know how members work, we have good relations, we seek to work with business managers in particular parties. Those are the channels that we would use to monitor and manage a situation like that. We are also trying to protect the victims. They are the focus. You have mentioned that a number of times already. They have to continue to be the focus. In the survey, the percentage of the perpetrators that were members of Parliament is around 45 per cent. Do you know how those members are? Have they been approached? Has action been taken at all following on from that? Or did the anonymity include a sort of more vague reporting of it? We do not know who those people are. In terms of the survey, we were asking people for their experiences, but it was not going to be a way of anybody naming anybody. One of the things in terms of the percentages is that we do not know whether that is a lot of different people or whether it is the same person. It is hard to tell from that. We did not break it down further than that. I thank the panel for coming along and giving us evidence this morning. I am sure that we will find that very helpful. We will now move into private sessions previously.


Buy Josh Gordon the peripherals are all there for Josh Gordon right now over the last two weeks Only Julian Edelman has played more snaps at wide receiver for the Patriots And he's played just 10 more than Josh Gordon and during this time Gordon is second on the team with 16 targets James White is first with 17 and Gordon leads the Patriots with a 34% Airyard share and his 11.6 average depth of target is first on the team during this time period So everything is pointing up for Josh Gordon. You should buy him now because the touchdowns will naturally come


Number six Curiosity tendency Now this is a quick one. So we'll go right through it Man is born curious Curiosity is the one innate quality of humans that differentiates us from the rest of the animals in the animal kingdom Gorillas do not try to be anything more than gorillas Spiders do not try to be anything more than spiders They stay in the environment. They don't change anything. They stay they remain the same over thousands of years Man is the only creature or animal that has this bizarre tendency to Try and advance in everything It's because of this tendency that we have civilization that we know today as we know it today It's because of this tendency that we have advancements in mathematics and science in biology in all these different forms of knowledge Because we are born curious If it wasn't for the curiosity of Athens, we wouldn't have a geometry the mathematics that we have today if it wasn't for those few Bright minds that chose to expand humane's horizons Think of Einstein if it wasn't for his curiosity on the nature of time and the speed of light We wouldn't have the theory of relativity. We wouldn't have a lot of these theories that we have today Like quantum mechanics and whatnot See Einstein came up with his relativity theory through the use of thought experiments No other animal has the capacity to have thought experiments Besides humans not just because of our minds, but also because of our curiosity if if we weren't curious we'll just Have accepted where we were in the great chain of being and Remain the same despite our intelligence anyway Marketers play on our innate sense of curiosity in the advertisements all the time I'm sure you've seen the ad where Some guy tells you that he got shredded got a nice rip six pack using his magic red drink and You can find out what his magic red drink is As long as you click on the link and go to his website and buy his product Or perhaps someone's got the secret to making lots of money. He's got a secret. He's found the secret and You can find this out too By clicking the link and joining his email list and he will share with you See these marketers use this because they know you click on it They know they will arouse your curiosity because it's in your DNA. It's in your blood You are meant to be curious so Be careful of this Someone's offering you something but not giving you all the terms or all the relevant knowledge Perhaps they're playing on your curiosity And you also use this to when you're advertising some of your stuff using words like secret or not Describing everything in the title keeping your title Open for interpretation will arouse people's curiosity and make them click on your stuff So that's just a quick one guys. I hope you enjoyed that peace All right guys if you haven't already make sure you check out the new personal development global group on Facebook Link is in the description Heaps of good shit for you. This is pretty much the go-to place for your personal development articles Free content for everybody and just a whole community that we're building up.  Peace


to my channel it's your girl Coco Stiles and welcome guys. So in today's video I'm just gonna give you guys a quick unboxing of some new perfume that I purchased. I'm trying to build back my perfume selection because it kind of went down for a while and I kind of stuck with the same perfume for a while and I just kind of just wanted to build build it back up. So today I actually purchased Marc Jacobs Daisy So Sweet. Now I was initially going to purchase Chanel Prevay but I didn't really like the way it smelled. So I said I wanted something light for nighttime and that I can sleep with and you know nothing too too strong. So this one and it's actually a toilet so it doesn't stay as long in my opinion. I tried I had a sample a sample one and I tried it out sorry for all the noise but I'm actually opening it up in front of you guys. So sorry for the noise but here it is it's the Daisy Daisy Love and it's the so sweet version. I got the 100 mil. I really like this and this is probably something that I'm going to keep in my selection of stuff because I do like to smell good when I go to bed. So here's the bottle it's very very pretty guys very pretty and very feminine. So it's this so sweet one like I said very light blush pinkish color on it in this little daisy flower which is actually really really cute and I'm gonna let you guys know what's in this particular one. I think you just pull off the top or whatever. I'm not gonna spray it because I didn't get a sample but for those of you guys who want something light and sweet who don't like the Chanel one this would be a good one and this is pretty much in the floral family. I wasn't a fan of florals before but I actually really like this and it has a little bit of a fruity floral scent. So I like I'm gonna read from the keynotes that I actually see that they have in here. So there's some white raspberry there's some daisy tree petals and sugar musk. Now the sugar musk is that's probably what I am smelling when I there's a different little hint of something else and that's probably what it is but it's not too strong it's definitely very very feminine and something that you can just wear after just getting out the shower or even coming home from maybe work or maybe partying and you take a shower and stuff before you go to bed and you just kind of relax with it. So it says this fragrance both knows of sparkling white raspberry to reveal a lustrous personality. So while the soft floral airiness and delicate musk immerse in you sweet what does it say sweetness of the moment the fresh gourmet fragrance creates an enticing atmosphere that truly embraces its name so sweet. Okay so this is it I think I I mean like I said if you don't like the Chanel because that's what I actually want to go purchase but I didn't like it and I didn't want to just get it just to say that I had it but this is something that I would wear definitely wear to bed um also I picked up some new face moisturizer I forgot the young lady young lady's name on youtube um she recommended this one it's the bobby brown enriched face base now this is mixed with like the primer and the moisturizer it's a little pricey guys I'm not even gonna lie um I'm opening it up in front of you guys but I did get a sample listen get samples I wanted to make sure that it wasn't gonna break out my skin first because I believe I don't have sensitive skin however some things just don't go with me it's not a huge bottle but you do not need a lot so the two little samples that I have I had them for about four days now and I still have they both still pretty much almost full um the bottle is cute it has a little b on top for bobby brown and it has vitamin e in it and it has what else there's something else in here well I guess that's the main ingredient which is the vitamin b but I like the consistency of this one it's very creamy I used to use what is it my primer I was using tarry but it was it's very very matte so I really didn't like that one but this I would recommend like I said I have been using it for a couple of well a few days now and I like it um I have not broken out in any type of rashes or anything so it's pretty much an all-in-one primer and moisturizer so I would recommend this I'm gonna link everything at the bottom but it is 62 dollars guys 62 dollars but I think it's worth it normally I wouldn't spend this much on a primer because I'm not I don't wear like I'm not like a makeup guru however I need my skin to be protected and I'm really big on not having like acne and stuff so if I can really control it but if you guys I see you have a little pimple right there um but so that's my biggest thing if I I know if something is not working if the next day or a couple of days later I'll break out of like a heat rash sort of kind of but this I didn't have any issues with this so that's another thing that I bought is the vitamin enriched face space by bobby brown and it's an all-in-one primer moisturizer so pick that up guys and what else so I actually bought a ring from Swarovski crystals and guys can I let me tell you well one few purchase from here or hadn't I think you guys should keep your receipt in your box I believe you have a year to take the stuff back um but this ring this ring is gorgeous gorgeous gorgeous I'm gonna put it on so now the size is on the website I believe they're like in 10s or something like that um I have big hands so I'm putting it on this hand just so you guys can see but I will not wear it on my engagement finger but um I have really big hands and a big feet so uh I didn't know which one which size was best for me my mom used to always say your ring size is your shoe size um so that's how I used to kind of like gauge it or whatever but this was actually a size 60 which she said is actually a size nine I do not wear a size nine however I am closer to a 10 10 and a half 11 um I actually do some shoe shoe holes for you guys for those of you guys who have big feet like me um but here's the ring it's very it's so pretty like this was 150 I believe 150 so it's sterling silver with the crystals and stuff and I just kind of got it to go with my little earrings or whatever just something very classy nothing too much um nothing too extravagant like I said I have I had diamond earrings before I had another ring that I totally lost so it just really wasn't worth it um maybe in the future I don't see I don't know how I lost it I don't really lose stuff maybe moving but this is the ring and it's crystals all the way around the band it's pretty thick I think it's a good little find for your add-in to your jewelry collection so again this is the ring and um it's super pretty like it's so pretty in person so I just would recommend you guys taking a look at it if it's a little too pricey for you way too they have sales because I believe they do have sale coming up um but I would recommend this ring if you like simpler things so that's it guys that's all I have for you guys today so there's a little quick unboxing for you guys I'm gonna place this back in here um and just a little quick unboxing for you guys and like I said keep your receipt just in case anything happens to your ring um hopefully nothing falls out of the ring any of the crystals or whatever and just hold them to the box they'll put you in the system and then you you pretty much get points and stuff and after I believe 250 you get like something or whatever um I believe it's in this little pamphlet let me see yeah they have like different access so you got bronze silver and gold if you spend from 250 I guess an up you get a 20 voucher and then the gold is 600 so I'll be honest with you if you're buying a hundred and fifty dollar plus stuff you'll end up being at gold before you know it and if especially if you're trying to build your jewelry collection but um yeah so that's it that's it just a little quick unboxing guys and like I said I do recommend everything that I have here the daisy perfume I love it for nighttime the uh bobby brown enriched face moisturizer base moisturizer I definitely recommend that and I recommend this ring if you're trying to if you're trying to build your you know jewelry collection and you don't really want to just go to like um I guess for a 21 and stuff like that um or you can just go buy real diamond ring whatever makes whatever floats your boat but that's it guys so I want you guys to hit that subscribe button and comment below if you stay to the end of this video Coco we see you like we always do and I pretty much will see you guys in the next one talk to you soon bye


Have you ever been so hungover? Your head is spinning when you wake up in the morning And you're just confused on what happened the night before That's me right now. Granted. I know what happened the night before but my head is just Out of there right now, but I need to make sure I got a video in for you guys So that's what I'm gonna do I'm gonna fight through this because I want to be able to make sure I keep bringing the content drunk or sober I was good job man. She was back again with another video now We're gonna check out the one biggest problem WWE can never solve This should be an interesting one wrestling. I mean great content creator, especially anything wrestling related y'all go subscribe to him I definitely am and I'm looking forward to this man WWE The thing is with him. I'm not even sure exactly what problem he may be talking about but the thing is with God damn, it's our plan by so it's the fact that Vincent's so stuck in his ways and He doesn't really change with the times like he should or you would think he would he's still Relying on old tactics that he's been using since the attitude era because he feels like he knows what's best for the business And at certain points he does but there's certain points on majority of the time where we're just sitting here as a consumer Baffled and confused on what decisions are being made who would prove this to be on television type situation And that's a lot of times where we we have to deal with you know and just watching Like it you want to see someone do so great in a role that they're so supposed to be portrayed in and ultimately they end up They end up floundering all over the place because WWE and management they think they know what's best sometimes and ultimately it's not let's see what problems That they probably will never solve or can never solve. Let's get into this. He has a big problem Unfortunately for the WWE and its fans It's a problem of their own making and one they're in no hurry to resolve Even worse the company seems determined to repeat it with Roman Reigns Chinese as WrestleMania look said the one problem Maybe not creating new stars. That's my guess WWE will never resolve be sure to subscribe and hit that notification Mel for daily wrestling videos and follow us on Facebook for exclusive list A Brock Lesnar is a kind of wrestler who doesn't come along often a performer who combines size power Wrestling ability and as seen in the last year charisma The WWE instantly recognized this when it signed him in 2000 and strapped a rocket to his back when he debuted on the main roster in 2002 however the Brock Lesnar who wrestled in the WWE between 2002 and 2004 is much different than the one who returned in 2012 the WWE used Brock Well when he returned to the company with the beast working some memorable matches against main event is such as John Cena the Undertaker and an extended program with Triple H Unlike many of Lesnar's future matches these were competitive bouts that saw Lesnar work 18 to 20 minute bouts by 2017 Brock was working short matches Although he wrestled house shows and pay-per-views his appearances were limited especially for someone holding the Universal Championship Which is one of the things I I was I just wasn't a big fan of When he came back and became the Universal Champion. It's like we never saw the championship Barely saw the champion and I get it sometimes over abundance can Ruin the buzz of that person. But when you're the head champion, you need to be seen every week every other week something we forgot There was a Universal Champion mother fucker was chilling at home. I was like damn man. We gotta get something going. So yeah Things didn't improve in 2018 or 2019 as Lesnar continued to dominate a 2020 was an exception as Lesnar worked briefly before exiting the company after WrestleMania 36 returning at 2021 Summer Slam, but are they misusing a special attraction a Brock Lesnar's reached the point in his career Where he should be considered a special attraction like Andre the giant as a long time fan to know There was never a need for Andre to hold a title as his presence alone was enough to command a main event Andre's brief reign with the championship was both the recognition of his decades of work in the WWF as well as a means to set up WrestleMania 4 as well title tournament But Andre's status as an undefeated baby face might have seemed boring in theory But in practice the WWF found numerous ways to keep him interesting Including exciting storylines where he sought revenge on heels or helped a baby face deal with a seemingly unstoppable team Even after Andre turned heel and lost a whole Kogan at WrestleMania 3 Andre's first pinfall loss recognized by the WWF They protected him and used him to help get others over even when his Akram Megali Which shortened his career and his life limited his wrestling appearances the WWE knew how to utilize him properly Is this faulty booking as the WWE's problem with Brock Lesnar is that the promotion rarely uses him when it does it's booking Has been baffling including some wonky situations including an unnecessary decision to repeatedly put world championships on him This is the thing I've talked about some of you guys may disagree like yo, he's the best thing right now Of course, he deserves the championship. I can agree and disagree I do think he's one of the better things obviously on whatever brand he's on But at the same time we're going back to that same well We gotta know at some point Brock is not gonna come back no matter how much money you throw at him He doesn't have to so at some point. It's like if Brock's not gonna come back. Who do you have on your roster? where They could be the next guy up. Well, they can't be the next guy up if they're getting squashed So they can't be the next guy up if they're not getting pushed So these are things that WWE they booked for the the short term game But not the long term and we've seen that so many times because they're doing it with Roman They're booking short term just for him long term in game Well in his case, they may be booking long term to set up a Particular story, but that's just for him. Everybody else is like it's whatever and it is gonna cause problems in the future When the Romans are gone when the Brock Lesnar's are gone when these people that we call on like they call on over and over and over To help out are gone Then what are you gonna do? You're gonna be left with the roster that you have and did you build them up to be so incredible? That's the question Lesnar and as fans know Lesnar's limited schedule translates into limited title defenses, which ties up the world championship WWE's booking of Lesnar has often led to bizarre booking with storylines that defy conventional wrestling logic Well, we'll admit this hasn't been their strong suit for the last 15 years Yep Lesnar's ability to insert himself into matches on what appears to be a wimp such as 2019's money in the bank and the more recent fatal four-way at day one Complicating things has been the WWE's rare title defenses for Lesnar and necessity due to his limited contractual obligations For one which defies wrestling long-standing tradition of at least one title defense a month, which is particularly convenient for a pay-per-view It says down to a lazy Lesnar though The WWE's booking a Lesnar has created more problems than it's solved in terms of building the WWE Lesnar is not without fault. Lesnar's work ethic has deteriorated since 2012 Lesnar's lackluster efforts are reflected in the briefity of his matches and his use of the same two moves Suplexes in F5s for those who have a notice to pattern Unlike limited workers like the ultimate warrior Lesnar has demonstrated he can incorporate brawling power moves and submission moves into his matches When he wants to the challenge has been motivating for him to do so a challenge the WWE has never seemed interesting in pursuing It seems like he's putting no one over. It's fair to say that Brock Lesnar rarely puts anyone over and has a special attraction He shouldn't as wins against Lesnar should mean a lot And I'm okay with that in if it makes sense for example Drew beating Brock That was one of the smartest things they did it just happened in At the beginning of the pandemic I think Drew would be in a better spot right now if he actually Would have been able to beat Brock Lesnar in front of a crowd. I think we can all agree there him beating Brock was perfect That was the one few times in WWE history where they really made the right decision and gave the right rug To somebody else and Brock put them over that was great Outside of that you don't really see it too much and he shouldn't be losing to everybody But if you're trying to build up a new star like they were trying to do in drew You got to have somebody that you put over, you know I'm saying so I Don't know who you know will be able to beat Brock I mean I did it with Seth. They've been trying to do it over and over and over with Roman You know, it's not too many people that's you know been been able to get put over by Brock Lesnar So it just once again comes down to how they want to book their future stars if they Choose to have someone like Brock Lesnar put someone over new Two wrestlers come to mind in terms of Lesnar giving someone the rub The first is Seth Rollins who defeated Brock for the Universal Championship at WrestleMania 35 And again at that. Yes summer slam. The second is Drew McIntyre I said showing against Lesnar in the 2020 Royal Rumble and his win over the Beast at WrestleMania 36 Cemented him as a viable main eventer. However, even in victory a wrestler can make the loser lock strong Something the WWE has done well with Roman Reigns something which rarely happens with Lesnar But there are far too many cases where Lesnar dominates opponents and reduces main event talent to glorified enhancement talent Kofi Kingston's 2019 loss to Lesnar killed the dreadlocked Dynamo's main event momentum Likewise, Lesnar's day one defeat of Biggie with just one f5 Did nothing to set up a rematch or show Biggie as anything but just another victim The latest monstrosity was Lesnar's squash of Seth Rollins riddle and AJ Styles at the Elimination Chamber pay-per-view So is it worth it him squashing all of them in the way he did sucked because at the end of the day He could have beat them we figured he was gonna beat them just but squashing former world champions like they're fucking mid carters And then killing fucking somebody damn in Austin theory That was that was fucking hilarious and quite funny and entertaining But the squashing of these world champs not so much Over regardless of many flaws in the WWE's booking of lesnar It could be justified if lesnar is a mega money draw who consistently boost ratings drive ticket sales and sells A ton of merchandise Now the answer is mixed in terms of ratings lesnar's appearances do seem to help but once he's off television Ratings typically go down As for ticket sales lesnar rarely performs at live events and it's difficult to engage the WWE's numbers for premium events on peacock One thing that is clear is lesnar's merchandise isn't the same ballpark as roman reigns or even legends like stonecore steve austin Lesnar's continued domination in the wwe is repeatedly weakened the roster Keeping stars from rising or with biggie and kofi kinksteen completely stopping their momentum Lesnar epitomizes mr McMahon's vision of what a top wrestler is big and bad Which has led to lesnar living like a king which benefits such a hefty payday An extremely limited work schedule and a strong saying in his booking It's also brought on cockiness as lesnar knows that vince will never fire him as we pointed out before There's no reason to blame lesnar for taking advantage of the wwe's largest but his laziness deserves criticism worse yet It's a leading to championship futility And perhaps the worst part about lesnar's recent build is that the title unification match at wrestlemania is a lose-lose situation for The wwe and its fans no matter who wins the match It's unlikely they'll go with anything other than a pinfall or submission finish Although there's no guarantee it'll be a clean finish leaving the wwe with a mess on its hands If broc lesnar wins the wwe will a wasted roman reins is year and a half championship reign Does broc lesnar need to win? No more than he needed to snap the undertaker streak and on a which more than a few wrestlers including the undertaker himself Think should have gone to roman reins. Lesnar has nothing to gain from defeating reins But it's possible the wwe will take this route A win by roman reins is somewhat better in that a full-time wrestler gets the rub Lesnar seems to be the next to lose to reins and while both men have traded wins during their wwe careers The wwe is making the wrestlemania match into the biggest encounter of their careers with both titles at stake Lesnar losing would be the final step in reins's elevation as this generation's superman in line of reins's wins over nearly every wwe superstar on the main roster including legends such as john senor edg and bill goldberg Is wwe ignoring the past the wwe is notorious for ignoring past mistakes Chief of all disregarding fans's wishes and roman reins's push could lead to even bigger problems than it's created with broc Judging by the wwe's booking there seems to be no end to reins's title run While reins has the benefit of being a full-time performer who appears on television on a regular basis and works house shows The wwe's insistence on booking him strong over all opposition Suggests the wwe intends to keep the belterman for a long time to come While reins has made some opponents look strong in defeat the wwe often overbooks the champion destroying any opportunities for rematches or even matches For example, this is this is very true, man This is the problem with having such a linty title reign that has brought people into question like Has it gotten stale because at the end of the day It's no how you book it You gotta make it believable where someone can actually get the job done He's ran through in the damning entire rosters, especially on smackdown Nobody on smackdown. Maybe drew really deserves a needing opportunity or can even believably get the job done and that's partly to wwe either Not really making his opponents, you know Seen viable towards like for maybe a rematch or they're not building up anybody new to even warrant You know saying rome reins even having to match with them dapple reins is winning a triple threat match over dandiel bryan and edge Who saw reins pin both men at once which naturally made reins look strong But makes his opponents look weak in a similar way The wwe had reins appear on raw pinning bobby lashley in a meaningless match when it should have saved it for later Reigns a survivor series match where biggie was a non-title match that did not have to end with reigns defeating him and especially pinning him cleanly Again, the wwe spoiled another potential match between what could be two top stars Perhaps the biggest problem with pushing reins so hard is that the wwe is overlooking one of its biggest vulnerabilities What to do if reigns was somehow taken out of action Injuries are unavoidable in wrestling But reigns also has to deal with the return of his leukemia something which can take him out of wrestling for an extended period Or for good What then will fans have the desire to watch wrestlers who were largely treated as second rate compared to reigns One thing's for sure and it'll lead to a future shock the wwe's continued push at the expense of other wwe superstars Is going to keep other stars from getting opportunities to compete at the top level Diminish fans' perception of wrestlers who are getting a push and create a vacuum when brock is not available or unwilling to continue The same can be said for roman reigns, but as long as the wwe's booking things in the short term aka hot shop booking Things are unlikely to change. What do you think of this situation? I enjoyed this video I enjoyed this it creates Those type of dialogues that some people don't want to have I'm I'm a fan of roman reigns title run. I have been a fan I can admit the flaws. I can admit the issues that they have and I can admit that they're booking themselves into a corner I've thought about this plenty of times.  You haven't built up anybody else. He's ran through the entire roster and in the way that he's done it No one really seems viable to be the next guy What do you do? They've booked themselves into a corner And I don't know if they're gonna be able to get out of this same thing with Brock Lesnar Once Brock goes back, you know, he's not staying at the WrestleMania season. You can go back home chill What are you guys gonna do? Where are you gonna be left with? These are questions that wwe They just they tend to forget man. They just booked for the moment a lot of times and figure out the rest And that's gonna be a recipe for disaster when everything is said and done Who are you gonna have left? Who's gonna be the next guy? Who's gonna be the next person to take up after? Certain people leave if you have that next person up Even you're just kind of screwed so comment down below and let me know what's your thoughts and opinions on uh On this particular video Do you agree with what wrestling layman was saying? Do you agree with some of the points I made or do you disagree and why? You know, so I want to get your feedback on uh this particular video But I appreciate all the love and support.  I'm gonna have a long day today. I appreciate y'all keeping to me. See y'all next week. Peace


Ever want to focus more on the creation of videos and less on the back-end work? Well now you can! Today, Mike covers a new browser add-on that lets you do just that! What is up everyone? My name is Zesty Mike and today we're discussing a new browser add-on that's changed the YouTube game forever.  Well, this add-on has made my life so much easier and I decided that I was going to share it The add-on is called TubeBuddy. You simply add it onto your browser, link it up with your channel and you're good to go. My favorite feature about this add-on is the copy and paste features. Due to all my travels and other obligations, I actually got really behind in my annotations. I missed about 50 videos worth of annotations to be exact. This add-on allows for you to copy and paste bulk annotations to as many videos as you want. I annotated all 50 videos in as much time as it took me to select them. You can also bulk copy and paste cards, bulk find and place sections in your descriptions, promote videos across all descriptions by a click of a button and much more. And there's a lot of other really cool features that you guys might like as well. For starters, comment filters, you can filter out all your comments depending on what you're looking for. For instance, only show questions. Now you can go through and answer all the questions without having to search for them. You can also easily submit a video to multiple different social media platforms and of course you can put their tag explorer to use. You can search tags and see the competition, see what similar tags are trending and what would be better options for your video. Another really cool feature that's out there is the defaults tab. When you're uploading a video you can pre-plan out your defaults to actually be there once you click upload. Well with this you can actually do different profiles. So you can have one for one series and one for another and have it change out depending on the video that you upload. And there's a ton of other really cool features that this add-on does have and they're working on making it better every day. But anyways guys, that's it for today. I know it was a quick video but it's helped me a ton. Hopefully it's helped you guys as well. If you want to install TubeBuddy for yourself and try it out you can click the link down in the description below. And of course if you want to see more of myself you can click the links down in the description below and find all my different channels and stuff that I do and find my face all over the internet and stuff. Yay. But anyways guys, that's it and we'll see you next week. See ya. Impulse is produced by the Freedom Network. Ever wanted to earn revenue from your videos? Freedom offers a great partnership program which includes access to hundreds of thousands of audio tracks, sponsorships with great partners, and most importantly a no lock-in contract. You can leave at any time for any reason. We accept everyone both big and small. For more information click here or visit the link in the video description.


September is National Preparedness Month and Cal OES is helping you take action to prepare. So join us at our annual Day of Preparedness Fair on Saturday, September 6th, starting at 10 a.m. This fun, filled family event is free and it's taking place in Old Sacramento.  Learn more on our website, caloes.ca.gov. See you there!


Doriqi of Kenya on Wednesday held an industry sensitization workshop on decisions of world radio communication conference 2019, with an aim to deliver it on the achievement made and on the way forward. Speaking during the workshop, Cabinet Secretary, Ministry of ICT, Innovation and Youth Affairs, Joe Mushero, say the ministry gave us to consult with public stakeholders on matters that affect them. Looking at the areas that were discussed at the conference, as alluded by the DG, as stakeholders in the ICT sector, we have the responsibility to contribute to this debate and ensure that spectrum and orbit resources are used equitably, efficiently and more importantly in the best interest of all end users. Availability of radio spectrum and orbital slots is an indisputable enabla for the growth acting Director General Communications Authority of Kenya, Mrs. Wanjao, says at the authority they are committed and will always continue to manage the scarce frequency spectrum efficiently. The authority is currently working on a 5G licensing and rollout map and already we do have some firms that have ongoing trials. Indeed, this is a call for action for all of us gathered here today. Kenya having a leadership position in this sector, in this industry worldwide. I believe this will be an opportunity for yet another platform. Father, Mrs. Wanjao highlighted some of the implications, outcomes if the world radio conference 2019 is well implemented. The WRC 19 approved additional spectrum for international mobile telecommunications, the IMT 2020, also known as the 5G mobile. The additional spectrum allocation to mobile services in the frequency bands 24.25 to 27.5 gig, 37 to 43.5 gig, 47.2 to 48.2 gig and 66 to 71 gigahertz will facilitate implementation of 5G mobile services in Kenya. Chairman of the Board of Communication Authority of Kenya, Mr. Ngenegituku, hopes to increase level of participation and contribution of stakeholders in the National Preparatory Committee meetings to countries' positions in the forthcoming World Radio Conference 2023. Chief Administrative Secretary, ICT and Broadcasting, Minister of ICT Innovation and User Affairs, Ms. Maureen Bakasi, the government has interest in youth and the youth are now included in the meaningful position and discourse. On the other hand, the CS pointed out more opportunities will be saved by the youth. The outcome of the World Radio Conference 2019, therefore, provides Kenya with additional spectrum allocations that can be utilized in various services to develop solutions to some of the challenges we currently face and equally enable us to provide better and improved services to Kenyans in areas such as universal access to ICS, food security, education, public security and climate change, among others. With over 40 radio communications spectrum from transport security and other communications, 5G networks will revolutionize how we do things technologically and offer unique opportunities across all economical fields. Reporting for Y254 TV, I'm Dereva Hilawi.


It's nice to have you back with us folks for another brain picking recap on one of the trades that we placed this week and it might not be the most powerful one. We had multiple high runners but this one is something that I will typically look for and many, many plays are like this. So it needs patience, it needs news, it needs volume and it needs some sort of planning and this is what I want to show you here exactly how I plan to trade ahead of time. So this is CRM Salesforce. It had news on that morning and I believe it was Wednesday morning. It had news with Amazon. We thought it could move higher, quicker. So what I do, I open the chart up and look what's happening pre-market and pretty much this is what's happening pre-market. Here is the pre-market activity on Salesforce and if you see from the previous day, you know, see this high line, we're not going higher than the previous day high. So basically, if we were opening, you know, in this vicinity, you know, a dip to the previous day high or some sort of resistance somewhere, a support, it could move back up. But we have not crossed this line before the, in the pre-market. So this tells me there's not much strength in it so far. So what I do afterwards, I'll take this line and I see this 24086, which is the low of the day and I'm looking at it and I'm like, okay, where does this go for? Where does this come from? I mean, I put the one hour chart and oh, look at this here. See on this one hour chart where it actually doesn't want to get. It used to be resistance here, resistance there, see, boom, boom, twice resistance and then over up, bounce, bounce. I mean, this is the one hour chart. So position is not super precise bang on the line, but you know, we're pretty close to it, right? On it again, on it again, on it again, on it again, on it again.  So what I do, this is one hour chart. It tells you that this 240-ish line, 241-ish line is pretty strong. So and after that, I'll go for the one day chart, move back, see how strong this line is. Oh, this is a little different, right? There was a big gap here that we jumped down below. So basically there's not much. If you look here, there's some sort of support. Here's not clear, but here is support before the drop, right? So basically now we have bridged that gap and we're not quite there yet. So on the one hour chart, it's pretty strong. On the one day chart, it's a little different, but it's the line that used to be there. But after that, I will look at the MagD. Look at the MagD, how the MagD is crossing down. So does it look like we're starting from, let's say, here's the bottom, right? Here's a cross at the bottom. We're crossing bottom. You're quite confident it's going to move up to a line like this. However, when you're crossing atop like this, you see that it's not like we're doing this, right? No, we're moving back down. Here's what happened. Here's what happened. Here's what happened. So pretty much it looks like it wants to move back down. However, the rest is doing the same. The stochastic is already moving down. The RSI is moving down and these are the Belinger bands. They're not in the chart. These are below, so my chart looks a little bit cleaner. But these are Belinger bands. They're closing in together. The TTM Squeeze, if you guys are using that, it's slowing down. So all the points are showing that we might pull back a little bit. However, the one hour chart to me really looked like there was strong support. Let's go back to the five minute. Five minute on Wednesday is this particular chart. So like I said, this is the high of the previous day. This is very close. We're not above it yet. So what we're trading is this. At the gate, we're not even bullish for anything. It starts pulling back. Where does it go down to? Goes down to a certain point and gets bought with volume moving back up. One could have decided to jump in right away. I didn't. And then he moves in on that second bottom. This I believe was 241 pretty even. Now this was double bottom, very close, lower than this area, but very close to the bottom that we have there. What does that tell you? It tells you that this is the final low. If we go below that, we may think that we have to pull out of the trade because the bears are going to take over the bulls. However, bottom one, bottom two. And then we looked like we were climbing and then lost some steam and then went to grab within one penny of the previous day low. And then this is when I shared in chat that there was nothing to worry about because we were bouncing on the previous day low and then we started rising and rising until the end of the day and it was good for a swing. Now I said the target, I was bullish on the play for a reclaim of this channel. See this was the bottom of the channel that I shared on the one hour chart and the top of the channel is this, right? And I said as soon as we get to 244-ish and I believe it was more in this area kind of thing. The top of the channel to me would be a reclaim that I would be happy with. Pretty much what happened and on the next day, which opened up being here right on target, we closed on our first target that was called in chat. So basically here I decided I was buying the following week given enough time because this is Thursday and Friday. We're taking out of the money. I went for the 245 calls on the following week and we bought that for 190. On the 244 target, we sold for 271, which isn't bad. And I sold partial. When I sell partial, I can sell 50%, 40%. Depending sometimes I can sell 80%, but in this particular case, if I recall, I sold 40% of my play. And so this is leaving me with 60% left. And the second part, I sold half of it. So now I have 30% left because I'm selling half of that 60. And I sold half of it for almost 100%. And this was at 357, 357 when we were rising up in that direction. And the good thing about it is now it becomes a free trade because we've taken most of our money out of it. It went to 247, 59, 69. And then it's coming back down again. And it's higher than the low. If it goes red, we're still OK because we took most of our money out. But the moral of the story here is this. Let me get rid of this here. This is where Friday it went, still for a higher low, very close to that bottom. See, Friday morning it opened right here on the remaining of opposition, very close to the low there. We're still inside the channel that we traded on the previous days. So the idea is you saw we weren't super bullish on the one day trade. So you have to keep in mind that you have to take your money out as soon as you see it, as well, most of it, because the trend and the one day trend looks like it wants to pull back. So you don't want to stay long because you don't have much time in a week, you probably will not turn around as you expect or as to go to the moon. So keep in mind, you're not trading from the bottom, you're already choosing from the top. You're expecting a breakout, which it did here at $247.69, but not quite. It was pushed back down again. So things to look for is exactly what I did. Well, it's not what you have to do, but this is pretty much what I do. So first thing, I look at when I see there's news in something, where are we opening? So you look at the open higher or lower than the previous day high, right? How is it? Does it look bullish? If not, you have to draw a line at the previous day low because that's pretty much where our balance could be. Now in this particular case, the support was on the previous day low. And if you draw a line on the one hour, I look at the one hour and I look at the one day and I look for support. Is there a common denominator on that or not? In this particular case, the one hour was pretty strong. The one day was not anything very fancy. Sometimes you'll see that there was a previous balance, previous support, but in this particular case, the one hour was pretty strong. So basically it's telling you that it will probably bounce on that line when it touches it. If it doesn't, well, that's your get out of the trade line. So it's pretty much your stop out. And because it's your entry, you're very close to the stop out line, so you don't lose much, right? And taking a week out, premiums will remain pretty strong when it starts dropping just pennies off your entry point. And target is at the top of that channel where you're expecting the break out. That's where you take partial profit because as soon as you start bouncing off the bottom and then you start reaching the target, you know, it might either consolidate or like in this particular case, it faked you out thinking it would break out, but not it came back down afterwards. So on target, you sell a good portion of your play because you're happy with it. All this is dreaming, you know, it's you're dreaming about something that could happen, but this is not what you traded for. You traded for some, you're entered here for a trade that was going for 244 here. If you get this, this is gravy. You got more than 100% or this is great. So if you're happy with the whole thing, fine, if you think it's going to go forever and you lock, you don't lock any profit, well, that's greed taken over. That's not what you want. So the plan was to enter low at support, exit on target and whatever the rest was, I exited half at 100% and this creates a green trade because what I have left is free, made my money out of that trade. So this particular trade is something that is very common. You look at the previous day, you look at support from the previous day, resistance from the previous day, you look if there's a common denominator on one hour on the one day, obviously this has to be played on momentum with news volume, otherwise it's just kind of sideways and it's going to burn premium and not go any direction other than just, you know, wherever the wind takes you. So whenever you see there's a possibility for a play with volume and news, look for this kind of play and you may end up with something that is pretty good. So I hope you're learning from something from this folks and I'm glad to be sharing it with you, sharing it with you. Have a good one, folks.