Welcome back to Exotic Wine Travel. I am your host Matthew Horky. Hi, I'm Sherry Intand. Welcome back to the show today. We have another exciting episode because we're talking all about Sattery the Hills and Santa Maria Valley high-end Chardonnay. I bet you were excited for this episode. Okay, but before we get started I want to let you know that this video has not been paid for in any way shape or form, but if you do like these videos they they add value to your life. Check out our guide to the wines of Santa Barbara called Sipping Santa Barbara. Recommend a Wine Zan produced. It's on Amazon, Kindle, E-Pub, PDF, all that stuff that'll be up on the screen. So we're getting ready to taste these wines. You know I used the Corvind to extract the wines and thank you to Corvind for the Model 2 Elite. They let us, gave us a test sample to use for these shows. We wouldn't have gotten, we wouldn't have gotten through the shows without it. It's great. Extract some wine. The cork's still on the wine. The wine can rest and live for another day. Nice and fresh. We're pouring into these beautiful Gabriel Gold Edition hand-grown glasses. 95 grams of glass, super light, super nice. Ready? Let's get, I'll have a discount code for some of the Gabriel glasses somewhere at the end of the video. Let's get started here. So Chardonnay. Okay. You scared me there. Can you put this there? Chardonnay. So you know Chardonnay is probably the grape. If you had one grape to represent Santa Barbara County, I would think Chardonnay would be it, right? Chardonnay if you don't know why it's zero. But across the board Chardonnays are fantastic. You know to the main areas, if you go to Santa Barbara County that you're gonna hear about Santa Rita Hills and Santa Maria Valley, both cooler climates, which is surprising for how far south Santa Barbara County is. So let's get started. These are all higher end wines. First we have Longoria. This is the Chardonnay 2014 Santa Rita Hills. Kuve Diana. 45 US dollars. Rick Longoria was the first winemaker actually to establish the wine ghetto in Lumpock, a very cool place. We had too much fun. Kuve Diana is made for his wife Diana who we met at the tasting room. Fantastic lady. Let me see if this is a vineyard breakdown. It just says blend of the best lots of Chardonnay. So let's get started here. It's barrel fermented. Let's give this a logo. You prefer center. It's nice because we have one Santa Rita Hills and we have two Santa Maria Valley, right? You're deep in thought already. Let me smell this. Caramel. A little bit of mineral to it on the nose too. It smells like a big California Chardonnay what I would expect too. A lot of banana, just a touch of wood not overly woody. This is really interesting. I don't usually feel that way about wine but this really paints a picture for me. I really imagine myself to be in a wet bathing suit, you know by the beach under the sun. Because salty. Yeah, salty and sun.  I have to say I'm not usually a huge fan of big fat ripe California Chardonnays but this one is really intriguing. I really like the nose so far. You love it. You love it. Okay. No fat at all. Really good acidity. Great bright acidity. Mineral driven. Wow. Bright, ripe. There's wood on it. Not too much wood though.  The wood is actually a complement to seasoning. It tastes really nice on the wine. It's full bodied Chardonnay mineral driven but laced with this gorgeous acidity that stretches at the length. This is a beautiful wine. I might be might be this is not my the most memorable Chardonnay that we've tasted among all the Chardonnays that we tasted. But this is definitely my favorite. Like that's what oh this is your Chardonnay that I'm used to. This is the style that I typically look for. If I get this at dinner, I'll be happy. I'm a 4.3 out of 5 on this. I think this is fantastic wine. Really fantastic. You know I don't score but I would go for 4.5. Really? I was actually thinking 4.4 and I was thinking conservative so maybe I go like scores really mean anything anyway. But okay you did. I'll go 4.4. That's what I put on our Vino account. This is the kind of wine I want to drink. It's drinking beautifully now. Rick Longoria, I love the wines. I love the house out. I feel like he doesn't get enough attention because his wines are always beautiful right? Yeah. Oh you love it right? It's just this amazing clarity in this wine. And I love that it's actually quite oaky on the nose but it's not that kind of heavy straight forward toasted nose. It's caramel. This is big California Chardonnay done right. In my opinion. What's the alcohol on this bad boy? Kuve Diana 4.13.5. Okay nice. Good job Rick. Good job. We're moving on to Dearberg. Dearberg and Star Lane. They're two estates. This is their Santa Maria Valley Dearberg Vineyard. Single Vineyard 2014 Chardonnay 32 US dollars. Tyler Thomas is the winemaker. His wines continue to impress us. All of the wines. This has obviously I don't know if you can see this. This has a real golden darker color. Let's get right. I am really excited. Dearberg's wine. This is 32 dollars. This is 40. The oboe and caramel is 45. I would like this just shot right past it but we'll see. Because their wines deliver more.  This is really interesting. It's a little bit more spicy on the nose. Different.  Not in a bad way. But the fruit really comes through for me. It's like pure pineapple for me. Sliced pineapple. Mm-hmm. Touch of vanilla. This is a little bit more. Got a little more spice a little bit. More saltiness on the nose. What else you picking up? Coming close to tropical food in fact. Really ripe. Let's give it a go. Excuse me. Yes a little bit of a light, abatious lift to it. Great mouthfeel. Fantastic mouthfeel. It's herbal on the back end. This is another one. We just did the episode of Liquid Farm where one of the Chardonnays kind of had this this herbal kind of a Sauvignon Blanc-y type finish. That's where I get on this. The spiciness. It's not that it tastes or acts like a Sauvignon Blanc. It's big round Chardonnay. It's I mean this just has a little more fruit. This has more minerally. But I think they're pretty much the same quality scale. What do you think? The contrast of the funerals and the acidity can be found in both. I think both 4.4. I can't tell which one I like more. I think they're and for this being at 32 US dollars. Good job by Dearberg. I have a feeling of their prices are gonna go up because they're getting monster scores from Robert Parker, Venice. Yeah. Are you as high on this as the Longoria? I would take another full glass of it later. I find the nose very intriguing. Oh, you're going to take a full. Let's get let's move on. Excellent show so far really. Oh, you know what? And these wines are all really enjoyable now. What's I really like about they have some city to hold for a few years but I really like them now. We're moving on to the one of Shireen's favorite producers. When we first went to Santa Barbara she said we have to go there. This is the Albain Climat, Nui Blancabouche. Am I pronounced my French as bad? The Peerless 2014. This is from his blue label. This is from two vineyards, the Bien Nacido K-Bloc and the Le Bon Climat, a state vineyard across the river from the K-Bloc. Yeah, blue label. This is his premium wine, $40. I'm ready to give this ago. Did you pour yourself already? I didn't. No more? No, it's fine. Now this is a little bit more richer. I think this is more Californian shadowy for me. Yeah. I didn't think that that's like a typical style. This when I smell it, it's almost like a Hildegard. This is blend that I was talking about. The wood shows a bit much now but it's gonna melt in a few years. But it's because the fruit is so rich and bright. You get really, really get a lot of tropical fruit in this. This wine kind of reminds me of Miani Chardonnay. Miani from Frioli. It's powerful. It's really tight in the mouth. Miani is one of our favorite producers, Frioli, Venetia, Giulia, Colt producer in Italy. Completely different style than these two. These two are drinking a little bit better now. But don't, a lot of wood here. Don't be scared of the wood because this is some fruit. The fruit is really ripe. This is some serious juice. How much longer you want to keep this in bar before you think you're drinking this? Easily 10 years. Really? I think it's a very powerful wine. I mean it's got, it's got some muscle, definitely. Like like Miani Chardonnay, it's the one that I appreciate. I can drink a glass. I don't think I can drink more than two glasses of this. Really powerful. This is powerful, powerful Chardonnay. It's Chardonnay for a great wine drinker. I'm having a hard time scoring because I'm not, it's not, and I'm not enjoying drinking it as much as these two now. But I see the potential going out. It's going to be fantastic with a couple more years in bottle. It's really spicy on the finish for the oak. Which one's you, which one you, what would your overall feeling on the three? Full-fledged aging potential. I think if you do it quite analytically, I would say Au Bon Clermont is probably maybe a better wine than Derebuk. But I personally love the Derebuk the most. More than the Longoria. Oh wait, I'm sorry. I'm talking about Longoria. I love the Longoria the most. I think the Derebuk has a place to feel as well because this is much more acidic, lemon, crisp. I think I'm going 4.4s on both. And I think I might go 4.5 on gyms just because I see that the fruit is so ripe. It's so big. And it's gonna last. The wine is, I mean, good job. Just like it's held to God. It's one of those Chardonnay retennings. Sorry, I'm just like still feeling it. Wow. Fantastic. So good job. You know, gyms are real influential wine. Probably one of the most influential wine makers. One of the most influential wine makers in Santa Barbara County. Check them out. I will put the links to all these wines in the description box. These wines, I think all three of these wines, basically you're only getting on the winery. I think they have limited distribution. So yeah, check it out. Guys, I'm going to put the discount code for the Gabrielle Glass Standard Edition up on the screen. You get 15% off the standard and the Alfa De Canter. Check out our wine. Our God, the lines of Santa Barbara sipping Santa Barbara. Anything else you want to add up is this is our last Chardonnay episode on Santa Barbara County. Really? Yeah. Okay, I'm going to hang out in the cellar after this. I'll just bring through everything. So guys, you can tell how much Serene loves Chardonnay. I love Chardonnay from Santa Barbara. And White Birkin. So guys, if you like this video, please subscribe to our YouTube channel, exotic wine travel. I will see you next episode.


N dropped and we did not have a yet another place to be here at the national family. So I'm very grateful for the opportunity that's been given to myself and I'm looking forward to it. I've been at Bradford now for two and a half years and I've spent the last twelve months as a full time coach and, as I said, it's a great opportunity for us and one that I'm excited to get going with. I don't think so. As I said before, you're dealing with people, yes, the footballers but they're people and I feel quite relaxed about it. myr submitted because it's already a good group of players at this football club that we believe in. Of course, there's going to be one or two that we havd to add, but right now we've come at a healthy stage with a good group of players. So for us were already crazy ahead of the game. I think we've got ideas. I'm sure when a lot of work is made around tear and call maybe getting to see agreements how feel it Ac mae'n gronwyr i'r pengyrchu a phrygau, mae leir Yn Llywodraeth, dros eu llyfin am y gwahanol, iddyn nhw'n teimlo fydd yn amlifer drwy'n cyhoedd. Pel, hynny rydyn ni'n ei wneud, ond rydyn ni'n go i gyda'r unig ei wneud i'n cael ei cyhoeddant a'n dod hynny'n creu'r cyhoeddon hefyd. Mae'n wedi fydd yn newid iawn i'r cyflwytaeth yma, fel ddim weithio'r cyflwytaeth ar yr ysgol, Ond roeddwn i'r cyfrifion o'r rhwng yn ddod yn ymdillion gyda'r Michael, Greg a rpm. Mae'n ffordd ar y cyfrifion, ond mae'n gweithio'n gwybod. Rwy'n dechrau'r gael y gallu ddod o'r holl ymlaen. Ond y gallwn gweithio'n gwybod ymlaen, roeddwn i'n gweld yn cael cael cyllidau sydd y gallu. Roedd yn ymlaen, roeddwn i'n rhan o'n rhan o'n rhan o'n rhan.?", hefyd saying to it is quite relentless because of the pursuit of what I want to do. Michael and Greger are quite similar in that regard. They work very hard and they are dedicated and committed. It should be said that we understand that we need to earn the right and respect of these fans at the football club, but what I can guarantee is that we will be giving absolutely everything ourselves to make sure that we make this football


Quickly want to talk about is what infra kit is doing towards sustainability So maybe in general talking about infra kit. We are a Finnish company. That was found at 2010 Based on a research project from the University of Olu in Finland and a construction company and technology provider There was a master thesis with the concept of how can I basically bring data from the BIM which is Most of the times only being used in a design phase towards the execution of projects So we basically connect data With the machines with 3d machine control with assets on the field Towards the execution because this is the missing link that still exists also here in the German speaking area Basically, how can I use all that data towards the execution to quality assurance those kind of topics and That's also one of the reasons. How can we become more sustainable? because most of the projects The costs are not in a design phase, but in the execution phase and later on the maintenance of projects and of course all the machinery all the assets on on on the project they cause CO2 emissions and what we are basically doing is we have a Logistics integration now with infra kit so we can bring all the BIM data together with as built three-time data from the project and also measure the CO2 emissions that is caused by machinery by different assets so about Six months ago. We were awarded by the Finnish country To develop our solutions towards more co2 so that means basically that we are currently in the development phase of Enabling co2 calculations for their projects beforehand But then the actual important part to also measure co2 as we execute on the project And of course a big topic. I just jump through some slides very quickly because this is From another one is of course the digital silos Which are often a barrier and the construction and also causing a lot of Change orders later on because we don't collaborate in a right way Basically between the design the ownership and the execution of projects So by enabling the different integrations Between the different stakeholders and then also connecting trucks in the fields We are able to to reduce a co2 emissions and I think that's also something There's the first tenders for example in Austria for 2024 our first projects where they Within the bidding phase the construction companies of course also need to calculate the co2 footprint and later on also in the Execution to actually show What the footprint in the project has been I Know I should talk more about this but since it was just last minute and I was not prepared on that topic Maybe are there any questions in general about infra kit or or that topic? Yeah, you get a microphone. I think This is what yes, I noticed that you mentioned that you work with co2, but I Didn't really get how you relate the co2 with beam Say again, please. Yes, you work with co2, but I don't really get how you relate co2 with beam Do you like set some standard to? choose to to some standard to calculate their to Like estimate their their ecosystem ecosystem of the building or something like that Yeah, we are more working in civil and infrastructure construction. So not the the vertical building construction That's our topic and they're of course the machines and assets on the field They are the biggest point. They're not so much the materials But where do you move material? How long does it take how many kilometers and There are some standards like the AEMP Standard from machines they provide like fuel consumption And those kind of topics that we can then utilize to calculate are the footprint and of course along with scheduling tools to also include the materials and movements to get as best as possible and Also, but that's also our job for the next few years to Develop more with the funding of the Finnish Government towards that topic. So not everything is fixed In detail yet, but this is the basic principle Yes, thank you By the way at 1445 so in an hour in stage five, I'm gonna showcase Austrian highway project and how in forget was utilized between owners design companies and the construction company and how they did benefit from that That is not so much the sustainability topic But still how to increase the efficiency of the projects and I think that's what all contractors or construction companies are aiming for Is to become more efficient and of course that also leads to to a better footprint and Yeah, sorry, I don't have to say more at that stage, but feel free to reach out to us We also here in hall a3 And then also yet a who couldn't come last minute. Unfortunately We can have a meeting or whatever and Very welcome for that


Alright guys, what is up, my name is Jacob, welcome to the channel, welcome to the video. Today's video I'm going to discuss after being in a six month bodybuilding prep, having competed twice this year and sitting at this moment, three weeks post-show. I'm going to discuss the positives and negatives of getting to 5% body fat, what it really feels like being 5% body fat. This is in a shredded state, you've got no lower belly fat, no love handles, everything's nice and tight, whenever you take in carbohydrates you can actually see a result from that pretty much instantly, you get veins up your stomach. In my next video I'm actually going to talk about the physical changes I notice or physical I guess you'd call them indications on my body personally that tend to change and come in, lines come in, places lean out, veins come in, indications that I'm getting towards this 5% body fat level that I'm going to discuss today, but whilst you're there, there's certain positives and negatives that come with being shredded, I'm going to call it shredded, it's quite surreal to actually know that I've actually been shredded, because a lot of people never get there, I never thought I'd get there, legitimately shredded, 5% body fat, but I did and it was a gradual process, I took my time to get there and I also, I did it my own particular way and if you want to know exactly how many calories I consumed or how I structured my day, etc, please go back to my video library and check out those.  So I tend to fast during the mornings in general, but I certainly use that as a tool during this time to get to 5% body fat and also to maintain it. So, you know, there was, there was an eight week period there where I had to maintain 5% body fat between shows, and intermittent fasting, using that every day, was not only good for my mental clarity, and production, and productivity, but also was obviously good, you know, to reduce the amount of calories and keep me in shape. So those are some positives about being shredded, being 5% body fat. Are there, you know, are there any more positives? I don't know. Obviously, the way you look, and the way you feel when you're hungry, those are the two main ones.  And they certainly helped for me. So what I think we're going to do right now is I'm going to shut the camera off, we're going to call this, we're going to call this, we're going to call this what we're the pop, what are the positives of being 5% body fat? What are the positives? Yeah, what are the positives of being 5% body fat? I'm not exactly sure what, what, what I'm going to call this video. But in the next one, we're going to talk about the negatives. So the truth, the harsh truth about being 5% body fat, the truth about being 5% body fat, the worst things about being 5% body fat, I'll get a title eventually. But that is a video I'm really keen to make, and I'm going to do it right now. So guys, please like the video if you've liked it, subscribe for more, check out www.majorkeyphysics.com for all of your bodybuilding and fitness gear. It is my business. And I'm proud of it. So all your support is appreciated. Thanks for watching. And I'll see you in the next one. Peace out.


Oh, yeah, that's what it was. All righty, we're all set to go then. All right, let me hit the go live button now and we're good. Okay, good morning. We are just coming in a little bit late around 10, 10. This is the convening of the Master's Gaming Commission. We just happened to have a bit of a tech issue. So our apologies holding this meeting virtually. So I'm going to do a roll call. Commissioner O'Brien. I am here, but I'm about to be in transit. So I will be passively listening for a little bit, but I am here. Okay. Commissioner Hill. Good morning. I'm here. Excellent. Commissioner Skinner. Good morning. Okay. Commissioner Maynard. Good morning, Madam Chair. I am here. Okay. Excellent. We'll get started today, Karen. I'll turn to you for any update you have. We've got mainly some regs to go through today. Yeah. So just briefly, I wanted to report to the commission that the launch of the sports wagering at the retail sites of the three casinos was successful. I have not heard any issues or any problems that have come to light, either technical or otherwise. So, so far, so good. And we'll continue to monitor and update the commission as needed. But other than that, we will now be transitioning to preparations for the category three launch. And we'll have more details on a timeframe and operational needs as we go forward. Okay. That's it. Excellent. Thank you. Any questions for Karen? Congratulations again to the entire team. We had our mission, we had a meeting yesterday for our agenda setting and take some, the entire team's efforts, every individual contribution to lead to success.  And your team, so congratulations to you. Thank you. Okay. I'm gonna turn now to then, Councilor Grossman and your entire team, including A&K. Good morning. Morning, everybody. We're gonna turn it right over to the other members of the team who have the presentations all prepared for you. And we will kick it off. It looks like with Judy. Good morning, Madam Chair and commissioners. This morning we have for you 205 CMR 105, the Investigations and Enforcement Bureau. This regulation was first brought before the commission on November 10th, 2022. It is existing regulation for the commission, however, with the onboarding of two, excuse me, 23. And we've modified it to extend the authority of the Investigation and Enforcement Bureau, also known as the IAB to this regulation. So we had a hearing for this regulation on January 31st, 2023 and received unfortunately no comments at the hearing, however, we did receive a good amount in the weeks leading up to the hearing in this meeting today. I'm joined by Mina Macarius from A&K who will walk you through the edits made to the regulation and a red line included in your packet. And I will turn it over to him. Thank you, Judy. So we have, as Judy mentioned, a slightly revised version of 105. This actually appears in your packet twice because of a change that was made last minute. So I think what I'd like to do is start at, just note that it's in the packet at page 13 of your packet. The red line changes you see are the ones in actual red ink are all ones that were suggested before when you pass this, these are changes to the existing, to the 105 that was passed in connection with the Gaming Act and the only changes that were made initially in your initial review were to add references to 23N. 105 has to do with what the Bureau's responsibilities are when investigating and taking enforcement action. The new change that we're suggesting for today is actually in two places in 105.04 and 105.05 on page 14, those changes appear in blue text. And where in the first version of this in the fall, we had a sort of broader reference to 23N. We've changed it to a reference to 205-CMR232, which is the enforcement regulation that we discussed a week or two ago now that you all voted on and passed. So the idea is to make clear that the Bureau's enforcement capabilities follow from that process with respect to 23N. And that's to make the distinction of statute. The only other changes, 105 that we're suggesting from last time, 105.06, there's the addition of the word that commission in one place about seizure of unlawful devices to avoid confusion of such stuff for 23K or rent to avoid any confusion that the commission could act under its authority. There is a removal in 105.09 to references to 23N because in conversations with the Bureau, the ABCC is just not referenced in that context. So all coordination would happen by virtue of the authority under 23K. And we again broadened in 105.10, a reference to the rest of 205-CMR for the purposes of procurement or hiring of independent investigators. Otherwise, the substance of this, sorry, and then the last change is in 105.10, all the way at the bottom of page 16, that's just a technical change to the title of the deputy director for the IAB that I think even if it's changed over time or was not reflected properly in the first instance. So that's that, those are the changes we're recommending. We can walk through the comments briefly and explain why we did not think any of the comments were appropriate for making changes at this point. Okay, before we go to the comments, any questions regarding the changes, questioners? Okay, let's go to the comments. I think we understand that you didn't adopt them, but they are extensive, so we should understand them. Sure, yeah, yeah. So this starts on page seven. Some of these are, they are extensive, but they're somewhat thematic. The 105, the comment from BEDMGM on 105.04, and this is a comment they made in a few places. The changes are fairly subtle, but it was requesting that there be a notice to operators whose information is shared with third parties, including law enforcement agencies, as part of the regulation. We don't recommend that as a matter of an enforcement of an investigatory agency's power to be required to automatically share with an entity they might be investigating. There may be other protections to the extent they're bringing enforcement or the commission's bringing enforcement, where you would have to share those, but to have it as a blanket rule might compromise an investigation. So that's why we're not recommending that. Any questions? I guess any questions on that general theme, because I think this is the one you'll see pop up in a few places. I'll set. Okay. Then another change was also from BEDMGM on 105.04. This shows up at the bottom of page eight, excuse me. A requirement that any information shared with, for instance, federal agencies be done through secure methods. Again, it's our understanding that the IEP does obviously take, and the commission takes confidentiality very seriously and security very seriously to put it in sort of a standard that suggests that there's some additional right for a third party did not make sense here. 105.04, that on top of page nine, again, still orders and directed. This comment predates the change that I just suggested, of course, but it's suggested to remove without limitation from the phrase, if yours shall have power and authority without limitation to issue orders and et cetera. And they suggested the power should not be limitless. It should be subject to a reasonableness standard. I think this is misconstruing what the phrase without limitation is intended to do here. It's intended to make clear that there may be other sources of authority. And that this is not the only source of authority. However, with the addition of the cross reference to 232, at least for sports weight-dring purposes, there is a much clearer direction of how that authority is to be exercised anyway. So that's why we are not recommending that. Similar comment on 105.05, almost identical comment. Again, I think that misconstrues the purpose of those words. This is back to 105.10.5 on page 10. There are sort of two comments again with respect to management of confidential or sensitive information by contract investigators. Again, first of all, I think the change is being made and the context we're making them in is to include sports weight-dring. We're not trying to change how the bureau or contract investigators do their work and how the commission engages them. So we didn't think this was the appropriate time to add that language. Further, the first change in particular suggesting that contract investigators have to delete or destroy confidential information. Putting that in the regulation may unduly tie the hands of the commission or its contract investigators in terms of retaining information if an investigation is not done, but is done, but there's a need to retain information for instance, to assist law enforcement. So again, we're not recommending any changes of this kind at the moment. And I believe that's it for the comments. That's right. So the drag that we would be moving on is on page 13 commissioners, right? Amina, 13. Yes. So the one that you're moving on will be the ones that start on page 13, correct. Any questions for Amina and team commissioners? Are you prepared to move on those commissioners? Commissioner Hill. Madam Chair, I would move that the commission approve the amended small business impact statement in the draft of 205, CMR 105 as included in the commissioners packet and discussed here today. And further that staff be authorized to take the steps necessary to file the required documentation with the secretary of the Commonwealth to finalize the regulation promulgation process. Second. Thank you. Any questions commissioners? All right, I'll take a vote. Commissioner O'Brien. Aye. Commissioner Hill. Aye. Like commissioner Skinner. Aye. Commissioner Maynard. Aye. Groups. Yes. Surprise you're on that. Turning miraculous, my apologies. All right. Are you still on? I believe I'm going to be kicking it over back to, to Yang, thank you. For 143 followed by Paul commoners for the rest. Okay. Let's hope we don't see you again. Thank you, but I know we'll see you in the near future. Okay. Continuing on then to Yang, do you want us on page 17? Yes, starting on packet page 17. Good morning, madam chair and commissioners. You have in your packet drafts of three regulations. Although each of these regulations are individual agenda items, I'm introducing them as a set since they are interrelated. The first regulation is 205 CMR 143.07. Gaming devices and electronic gaming equipment, which governs the technical standards for gaming devices and electronic equipment, specifically as they relate to kiosk and has been amended to include an updated reference to a more recent version of the technical standards cited within the regulation. The second regulation is 205 CMR 243, sports wagering equipment, which governs and adopts the GLI technical standards required for sports wagering equipment. And then finally, the third regulation is 205 CMR 244, approval of sports wagering equipment and testing laboratories, which governs the process for the technical approval and testing of sports wagering equipment to be utilized in all sports wagering activities. You will also find an amended small business impact statement for each of these regulations in your packet. When these three regulations came before you on November 17th, 2022, you voted to promulgate by emergency and also to begin the formal regulation process. The regulation has been working its way through the process and the public hearing was held on January 31st, 2023, presided over by commissioner, commissioner, Irina O'Brien. We received comments for these regulations, which I'll ask ANK to discuss some more detail. At this time, we're looking for a vote to the finalized promulgation process and file the regulation with the secretary of state. I'll now turn it over to ANK to discuss the comments and answer any questions. Great, thank you, Ying. And so, ANK is the sub attorney commoners, Paul. Good morning, Paul. Good morning, commissioners, madam chair. I'm going to start with 2.43. I apologize, we may have had a slight internal miscommunication about who has 1.43. That's okay, Paul. 2.43 also appears later in the packet, so please start on 3.43. 7 for the copy that we'll be discussing today. Okay, page 30. 37. 37, the comments preceded, got it. Just one minute, there we go. So as a reminder in general, 205-CMR 243, adopt GLI 33 standards for event wagering and then tweak it in a number of ways to conform to our statute, to conform to our practices and to conform to updates to best practices nationwide. Based on a handful of helpful comments from DraftKings, GeoComply, and BetMGM, we're recommending a few tweaks. I'll walk you through those edits as they appear in this draft and then I will take the remaining comments one by one. So the first edit appears on page 38. It shortens the time between location checks, pardon me, 37, it shortens the time between location checks for typical patrons from 20 minutes, to 20 minutes from 30 minutes. This responds to a comment from GeoComply and we made this change with GLI as a bison input. The next change is going to appear at the bottom of page 38 and at the top of page 39. It responds to a comment from DraftKings. As written, GLI 33 restricts employees of operators from placing sports wagers with any operator whatsoever. This is more expansive than what is required from under chapter 23N, which only requires that employees be prevented from placing bets with their own employer. And we understand it's more expansive than your typical practice nationwide.  Employees, this language would prevent employees from placing bets with their own employer or with any operator tethered to their employer. We also realized that the existing language didn't necessarily cover qualifiers who were not employees, directors, owners or officers. So we added qualifiers in to get that extra coverage. Also, I do need to apologize, but there is one error in here. This should say replace section A24A rather than replace the first section of the A24, this program, replace the first sentence of section A24. It should be one instead. So this, the edit on subparagraph two starts with replace the first sentence of section A24. It should say replace section A24 parentheses A. Got it, thank you. So the next two changes appear in red line on the first half of page 40. And these respond to two comments from that MGM. Well, do you mind just going back to the exception clause in that red line, the exception in private, aren't any of that accepted in private rules? Yes. Thanks. At the top 39. So that appeared in GLI 33 already and I understand it's a standard term. So does that address the issue that they raise around DIC sports? Is that one of those? I don't know, except in private rules where they're associated with the operate. They only disclosed and have GLI's on. Okay, we can hold on that. Maybe GLI can join us on it. All right. I think the larger objective is likely to ensure that is likely to respond to the fact that the integrity concerns of an employee of the operator who might have access to private information or greater access to information about the workings of the platform should not be betting against the general public, but the same integrity concerns don't arise when they're betting in private pools where their identity is clearly disclosed. Got it, thank you. So the next two edits appear on the first half of page 40. So these both respond to comments from that MGM. The first change just concerns when operators are required to forward an independent technical expert security audit to the commission. Bet MGM asked that we change conducted to completed so that it's slightly clearer. We've read it slightly clearer and so we recommend adopting that edit. The second item is the partial adoption of a comment. Bet MGM asked that we narrow the obligation to provide a remediation plan to those items which the independent technical expert identifies as high priority. That's a fine default rule, but it can't be the absolute rule because that would undermine the commission's authority over security issues. And it would invite the operators to haggle with their technical experts over the classification of items. So we adopted Bet MGM's proposals, the default rule, but added another clause, retain it so that, which retains the commission's authority to order them to take corrective action with respect to any other item identified by the independent technical expert. Mr. Chair, is there any questions so far for Paul? Okay, we're all set, Commissioner Skinner. You're done, thank you. I'm okay. Thanks, Jordan. So we have one more edit at the bottom of page 40, top of page 41, and here, it's all right, I'm going to share my screen because I think this one is going to look somewhat arcane unless you can actually see how it's incorporated into GLI 33. Just as a word of background, this concerns wager cancellations. As it stands, GLI 33 requires operators to obtain prior commission approval for all wager cancellations, even though it was made in accordance with the operator's approved house rules or internal controls. The need for the commission to weigh in on every single cancellation is unnecessary and it's also inconsistent with 205CMR238.35. And so we recommend adopting these two tweaks in order to conform the two regulations and to streamline appropriate wager cancellations. So the edits made by these tweaks to 205CMR243 show up in the relevant portion of GLI 33 as in red line and highlighting here. Any questions on that? I think we're all set. Do you want to go bring us back to the comments? Yes, Madam Chair. So the first edit that we do not recommend adopting appears on page 31 of the packet. So this deals with the minimum time period before players who set deposit limits can adjust, can lengthen those, sorry, can adjust those deposit limits upwards. The basic concern that draft Kings has expressed is that 205CMR243 and GLI 33 set a much shorter time period before a player can make an upwards adjustment. They undo the daily fantasy sports regulations enacted by the Attorney General's office. So operators who offer both sports wagering and daily fantasy sports from the same wallet must adhere to the Attorney General's longer time period for both, while operators who offer only sports wagering or who offer a sports wagering specific wallet can conform to the shorter time period from our regulations. They have asked that if we lengthen our one day time period match the Attorney General's 90 day time period. We recommend declining this request. This only affects operators who offer both sports wagering and daily fantasy sports from the same wallet. And draft Kings can pursue a change in the Attorney General's daily fantasy sports regulations. And then the final comment that we do not recommend adopting appears on page 32. draft King is asking for a tweaked particular multi-factor authentication requirements that appear in GLI 33. We've checked with GLI who's confirmed these are industry standard requirements that draft Kings complies with. And in light of that, we don't believe that an amendment is needed. On that point, Paul, is it that we require the multi-factor authentication or do they have to have the option? Or is it where they do require uncertain components and then there's an option for other components? I believe it's this comment is on transactions where multi-factor authentication is required. Okay. So where draft King says it's not mandated by other jurisdictions, GLI says in fact, what we have is consistent with other jurisdictions. So it just may be a misunderstanding of some sort. Yes, I think the regulation does not cover what draft Kings is concerned it covers. Okay. If there's any continuing confusion, draft Kings can reach out to executive director Wells on that point, just to make sure we're all clear. Sounds like it is not a concern, Karen. All right, I'm sure how do you have a question on this? Not at all. Ready to move forward. Yep. Any other questions on these comments? The rest we were responding to in some way. So this is, sorry, Madam Chair, this is commissioner Brian. I just got back on my computer and was able to pull this up and sort of listen along. I was wondering if we could go back to page 31 and the first comment in terms of the 24 hours versus the 90 days of the DFS regs. So I'm just wondering, they make a representation because of shared wallet that they're not going to be able to offer less than 90 days for limitation. I guess I'm trying to get trying to figure this out is are they saying that they would have to be 90 days? Yes. To make it less restrictive? I think to be, it's actually more restrictive, right? I'm sorry, to make the limit less restrictive is what I should say. Right, I think what Paul was saying is that, the attorney general's regulation competes with powers. So I think they would have. No, I get that part. And I guess what I was trying to figure out is it seems like the AG DFS reg is more protective of sort of making sure you don't increase your limits. And so a question that I throw out for us is, I'd love to know why that was. And we're doing 24 hours, they're doing 90 days. That's a huge delta. And so. A very big delta of the 24 hour period. It's my understanding is more consistent with sports wagering protocols. And are we, do we look into that at all? Attorney commoners? Is 90 days more likely to be the number of days or is 24 hours more likely to be the upgrade time? Anybody look at that? I don't believe we've, we have not gone out and independently researched other jurisdictions, but I believe this is, the 24 hour period is standard from GLI 33. Yeah. Yeah. So I guess the question I have that obviously not for today, given the pace that we're on, but I'd love to get that information because I'm curious. That's a pretty big delta. And I just like to have more information about why that is. And is that true in the DFS world? Or is that more a Massachusetts anomaly? In which case being in Massachusetts, I think we should talk about it at a meeting in the not too distant future. That's absolutely appropriate. We can look at it. I think I'd like to know what the, if in fact other jurisdictions are following the 24 hours. Right. You know, remember that I don't know how long that drag has been in place, Commissioner O'Brien on the 90 days, but we certainly can have conversations with the AG's office to see their thinking. And it may be a shift, but I don't want you to think because of the pace you mentioned the pace we're on. I don't think that's an issue right now. This is something that's before us. And we could make that change. My recommendation without further evidence that we're our original drag is inconsistent with the industry that we are currently regulating. I wouldn't recommend a change, but I'm all ears. Anybody wants to entertain an expansion on this period of time. I don't want pace to be an issue here. Yeah. So I guess my point is I don't know if I would recommend that because I just don't feel like I have enough information in front of me today because this is really the first noticing or someone's flagging the Delta for me. So. Okay. So you're okay. Then we stay with respect to the recommendation today to not adopt that, but we put it on for if the team take a look at that, find out why, to any explanation on the Delta. Yes. Yeah. And even other jurisdictions or is there a Delta DFS across jurisdictions or is this a Massachusetts issue where maybe we have some dialogue with the AG's office in terms of why they did that? Yeah. It does show that there'll be times where the regulations may not be completely aligned and we'll just have good open communications with the AG's office to work it out, but they are two different industries in a sense. All right. Good. So we'll continue anything else on those comments. As I think Paul pointed out, the rest were either fully adopted or partially adopted. All right. Commissioner Maynard, I don't know. He may have shifted. Oh, he's still there. So, I don't know if you can hear me. We can, we can. To Commissioner O'Brien's point, I was sitting here thinking too, Paul said that Drafting could go and speak to the Attorney General's office and try to get a change, a right change there. I am kind of interested in knowing what, I mean, it's rare that a operator comes to us and says, hey, we want to be more restricted, not less restricted. I am interested in knowing what the technological hurdles are for companies that do present both products and thinking about how we address this. So, and so for Drafting's, I'm not sure if it's even so much technical, but they, I think even if they did have the technology, they would be obligated because of their single wallet issue to not bifurcate their practice to comply with the 2X. I think they were hoping then that the entire industry would shift to the more restrictive standard. But also you're- I totally get that, Madam Chair. What I'm saying is I'm wondering if this is a technological problem that can be overcome, right? That's what I'm really asking just to be frank. Yeah, and I think that that is, I think on the single wallet, that bifurcation issue for a few things are important. So to follow up then to the team for Commissioner Maynard, if we could also just look at what the, you know, if in fact the standards are gonna be different, are there technological challenges for Drafting's and others with both the other chemistry sports that also impact this issue, right? So we can explore both. Commissioner Maynard would you like that? Yep, that works. Okay, thanks. All right, anything else? Okay, I mean, I guess if there are no other questions, we would take a motion on this is- I think I see Commissioner Skinner ready to make one, right? I'm ready when everyone else is. Okay, Commissioner Skinner. I move that the commission approve the amended small business impact statement in the draft of 205-CMR 243 as included in the commissioner's packet and discussed here today. And further that staff be authorized to take the steps necessary to file the required documentation with the secretary of the Commonwealth to finalize the regulation promulgation process. Second. Any further edits? Okay, Commissioner O'Brien? Aye. Aye. Commissioner Skinner? Aye. Commissioner Maynard? Aye. Aye. Excellent, and I go yes, five-zero. Thank you. Aye. Okay, so what's next? Is this Commissioner, is it Attorney Comerter?  Madam Chair, you'll have either Attorney Macarius or Attorney Lee next, and I'm just confirming which one. It's- Okay, no problem. It'll be any Lee. It'll be any Lee. You won't have me back. For today. I got the message loud and clear. He won't be back. Thank you, Attorney Macarius. And Paul, are you all done for the day? I believe so. Thank you, Attorney Comerters, to both of you. Thank you, Madam Chair, Commissioner. Now we have Attorney Lee. Thank you. All right, thank you everyone. Good morning, commissioners, and good morning, Madam Chair. So I am going to walk us through the comments received to 244, which is on the approval of sports wagering equipment and testing labs. You'll see 244 begins in your packet at page 42. And so overall, the commission received a handful of comments and questions, clarifying questions about these regulations. Ultimately, we don't suggest adopting any of them. So I'll start first with the questions. We received two related questions. One was from Penn and the other was from Canby, which I understand is going to be a vendor to some of our operators. And this question was a clarifying question about 244.03. They specifically raised that in GLI's Change Management Program Guide, GLI permits either operators or their technology suppliers or vendors to handle change management related items directly with the commission. So the way that the regulation is currently written, it appears as if the operator is the only entity that can submit information for change management policies and procedures to the commission. After conversation with GLI, we would suggest the commission clarify that in accordance with GLI's Change Management Program, vendors are permitted to submit information about change management policies and procedures directly to the commission. However, if a vendor does submit that information to the commission, that does not relieve the vendor, sorry, relieve the operator of the operator's ultimate responsibility over a change management. The operator is still responsible for their change management, even if it's the vendor who is the one who is immediately aware of the information and submitting that information to the commission. If there are no questions on that one, I'll move on to the next question. Commissioners, are you all set? The only question I have, madam chairs, Annie, what page are you on at this point? So that was 244.03, and apologies, I just lost. Page 49, maybe it was the 10-1, and then the can be one, one of the can be's didn't come through, and I asked Crystal to have legal senate to our email, but the other can be one was page 50. There's one that starts on 47, but that's the one that's not complete and was rectified this morning. Thank you. Should we see that in our email? I believe so. Okay, let's just see. So the whole packet came through Crystal, is that what it is? Madam chair, I sense the, just that comment language. Let me check what time that went through and what the subject was. Thanks, Denise. At 9.54 to 44.03 public comment is the subject sign. I have got my glasses, Harry. Too many people, there it is, I see it now. Thanks, that's really helpful, okay. So that's a clarifier, thank you. Yes, this is a clarification question. Yeah, so the two asked the same question, got it. Everybody else all said, I don't know if you, there was a comment from Cambi that wasn't completely clear. I don't know if you want to read it, those who don't have, I'm sorry, I think it's. I have it up, I think we can take it down when you guys. There you have it up now, thanks. Now I see, okay, all set, commissioners, thanks. Great. Okay, all right. And so the next clarification question comes to us through Bette MGM. They asked, their comment is provided on page 48 of the packet, it's at the very end. This is a question with respect to 244.04 section six. That specific section is on packet page 45. And so Bette MGM asked the questions if a testing lab relies on data from another commission certified testing lab. Is it permissible if both labs are not ISO certified or do not accept the testing results? So I think that just to sort of clarify this question after discussion with GLI, the provision of 244.04 subsection six permits a commission certified independent testing lab to rely on the results of another commission certified independent testing lab. ISO certification refers to another organization's certification sort of similar to GLI, it's just an industry-wide certification. However, because the gist of 244.04 subsection six is that both labs have to be certified by the commission in order for one lab to rely on another lab's report for a purposes of complying with 244. If both labs are not certified by the commission or they do not accept the testing results in 244.046 simply does not come into play. In other words, because the commission's regulation requires both labs to be certified by the commission also requires the lab relying on the other lab to accept those results. The scenario that the MGM poses here just simply wouldn't be permissible under that specific section of the regulations. If there are no questions, I'm happy to turn to the two suggested amendments that were proposed by the MGM. I think we're all set to hear those. Okay, so the first comment that MGM makes or first suggested amendment that they make is located on your packet at page 47, it's the very end. They propose replacing promptly in 244.02 subsection six with within 48 hours of confirming an issue. After discussion with GLI, we understand that there's no hardened, fast rule about what promptness means in any given situation. There might be some serious issues that require reporting to the commission as soon as the operators made aware of it. So in less than 48 hours, there might be issues that on their face seem a little bit less pressing and therefore the operators can spend a little bit more time investigating whether or not there truly is an issue before reporting it to the commission. So we would not suggest adopting this amendment from the MGM. Any questions on that? Okay, thank you. And then finally, the last comment is at the top of packet page 48 again from the MGM. They suggest adding a provision to 244.04 subsection four that would make the log or communication that's submitted by an operator to the commission as confidential. Their concern is based on that a log could contain sort of an email or discussion that could contain trademark secrets or technical investigations. However, for the reasons that Mina stated earlier today, the commission ultimately doesn't have authority over what is considered a public record and what is not. That's where the secretary's office to the side will also note that this log is not considered part of an operator's report. And so there, which is itself a public record by our regulations because it's not part of the report and it's not clearly a public records. There's no need to sort of add this extra layer of confidentiality that in any case would not be appropriate for the commission to include in the regulations here. Questions for Amy on this? Okay, I guess I'd like to thank those who participated and provided comments throughout for today's review. So thank you to everyone who contributed. No further questions? Do we have a motion on this number 244? Madam chair, I move that the commission approve the amended small business impact statement and the draft of 205 CMR 244 as included in the commissioners packet and discussed here today. And further that staff be authorized to take the steps necessary to follow the required documentation with the secretary of the commonwealth to finalize the regulation promulgation process. Second. Any questions or edits? Okay. Commissioner Bryan? Hi. Commissioner Hill? Hi. Commissioner Skinner? Hi. Commissioner Maynard? Hi. And then I thought, yes. Can we circle back to 143? Yes. So we're going to circle back to 143.07 kiosks which is on page 18 of your packet. I'm going to cover this today. It's a short one. It's very short, yeah. So we did not receive any comments on this reg. I'll walk through it in a second but we did not receive any comments on this reg. So we would recommend adopting the final version as it was originally adopted by the commission and just as a quick reminder, this reg is pretty straightforward. What it does or what it originally did is it adopted GLI-20 regarding kiosks for our gaming licensees. And so the amendments that were made to it and that are currently effect now include sportsway during operators and vendors as also having to adhere to GLI-20 kiosks. It also updated the version of GLI-20s that all the different operators have to adhere to. And so we, again, no comments on this one. So we would recommend approving as is. The final version is on page. It's on page 18. So the one that's redlined is the final. All of those are adopted, okay? Yeah, because this is an amendment to the 143. Yeah. Any questions on this? Okay, I see Commissioner Hill leaning in. Madam Chair, I move that the commission approve the amended small business impact statement and the draft of 205, CMR 143 as included in the commission's packet and discussed here today. And further that staff be authorized to take the steps necessary to file the required documentation with the secretary of the Commonwealth to finalize the regulation promulgation process. Do I have a second? Second. Okay. Any questions or edits? Recommended changes. Okay. Commissioner O'Brien? Hi. Commissioner Lainard? Oh, I'm sorry. I'm looking because he popped in. Commissioner Hill? Hi. Commissioner Skinner? Hi. Lainard? Hi. And I vote yes. Five-zero. I'll set on that. Excellent work. Legal, do we have anything else? I think we're all good today. Thank you. Excellent, Caitlin. Thank you, everyone. Thank you to every member of our team and to A&K. Thank you very much, Annie. I think she has excused herself and quite properly to thank her for her work. All right. Commissioner, do we have any additional updates that we need to address now? Sounds like no. Then I know that we have one commissioner who has to travel for some family needs. So he travels, commissioners, do I have a motion to adjourn? I'll adjourn. Second. Commissioner O'Brien? Hi. Commissioner Hill? Hi. Commissioner Skinner? Hi. Commissioner Maynard? Hi. And I vote yes. Five-zero. Have a great day, everyone, and thank you to the entire team. Thank you so much.


Hi, and welcome back to this video course on biological psychology. Now, this is section 3 in which we're going to talk about perception. And this video, video 3.1, is the introduction to section 3. So we're going to start by providing some reading, some texts. And as throughout this course, we're going to use the free textbooks provided by openstex.org, which you can download for free from this URL. From the psychology textbook, we're going to use chapter 5, sensation and perception. And from the anatomy and physiology textbook, we're going to rely on section 14.1 about sensory processing and 14.2 about central processing. And I always like to recommend a more accessible popular science book for the interested reader. And this time, I would like to recommend a book that is personally very dear to me, The Mind's Eye by Oliver Sechs. Now Oliver Sechs is a clinical neurologist, so someone who works with patients. And in this book, as in many of his books, he talks about individual patients that have particular symptoms, and in this case, perceptual deficits. So for example, he talks about a woman who develops agnosia, so she becomes progressively less able to recognize the objects that she sees. Now what makes this book somewhat grim, but beautiful at the same time, is that Oliver Sechs also talks about his own ocular cancer, which he developed at some point.  Now at the end of this book, he was treated for this and mostly cured. Now what we know now is that at some later point in his life, this ocular cancer came back and eventually killed Oliver Sechs not too long ago. So I think reading about this now with the knowledge that we have now makes this a bittersweet experience. But it's nevertheless a very good book and I really fully recommend it. So what are we going to talk about in this section? So in video 3.2, the next video, we're going to first briefly talk about what sensation is and what perception is and the various senses that we have. Then in video 3.3, we're going to move to vision, visual perception, followed in video 3.4 by Gestalt theory, which is a theory describing how we process visual information. Then we're going to switch modalities in section 3.5 and we're going to talk about hearing, followed by touch in 3.6. 3.7 is going to discuss taste and smell. And finally in 3.8, we're going to talk about balance. Now without further ado, let's move on to the next video, video 3.2, in which we're going to talk about sensation and perception.


మార్లుట్లు ఇద౉లులికొరకును రిఫ్మిసిసిసండిసార్మారివెందారెదైండిమిమిదిబురందినాకూదా.  What to buy some chicken? English chickens only $1.50 $1 a kilo you want. What difference does it make whether the chickens are English or local? We can't even manage two square meals a day and you come to tell me about chickens? What's going on here Parbhuti? Here you go. Got this from Bazar.  That's very kind of you, bless you. , , only you. It's been ages since we had chicken. Oh! He didn't come bearing gifts for us. This chickens are for sale. Oh! I thought. Where is my saree, hmmm? I'll get you one the next day the bazar opens for business. You have been singing the same song for the last six months. Next time, next time! When is that gonna come you suppose? Scream at me all you want later. But please at least don't insult me in front of Shadamia.  Is there any difference between your esteem and insult since you can't even manage to give a saree to your wife? The truth is, sister, your family is in poverty. It's getting difficult for brother Deepak to run the family on a single income. How are you start working too? What are you suggesting that I start working as a day laborer like the men? How about I go to the crop field and work as a day laborer like your brother? I would rather die without food before letting her work in the crop fields in such inhuman conditions. You know, you could start working on batik prints sitting right here at home. Hmm, so how does it really work? It works by making designs on clothes by using wax and color. The expenses are very low but you can earn a hefty profit. You can set it up at home. Well then, I will learn how to make batik print. Good decision. Now keep these two chickens. You can pay me back when you start reaping the profits from batik prints. Shadamia. Super. Alright then. I will be having dinner with you guys today. Then we can go to the training center to learn about batik prints. To make a cloth valuable and attractive, different colorful designs are made on the clothes. This process is called batik print. A lot of profit can be generated with only a small investment. Anybody can do this work for the entire year sitting at home and earn extra income. To do batik printing, you will always need the following. Table, ruler, bowl, cooking pot, brush, designs, painting brush, other than hot or stove for cooking, jaunting, plastic gloves, bucket, spoon, iron, etc. The raw materials necessary to do the batik printing job are tracing paper, newspaper, carbon paper, washing soda, pencil, monopole soap, fine gum, eraser, white wax, brown wax or honeycomb wax, dye, sodium mononite rate, salt, caustic soda, resin, kerosene, soap, sulfuric acid, detergent powder, robin blue, cloth, dyeing fixol, etc. If you free the gum from the cloth, dye stick to the threads firmly. To free the cloth of gum, you need to have boiled water, detergent powder, washing soda and water as necessary. You have to wash the cloth after wetting the cloth in normal water. And then, after boiling water in the cooking pot, you have to mix the necessary amount of washing soda and detergent powder in the boiled water and stir the cloth. Then you have to keep the cloth soaked for 30 minutes and dry it after washing it thoroughly. Gum free cloth will be ready for printing after ironing the cloth. At first, let us all know the names of the materials that are needed to wax the cloth. The materials are pencil, carbon paper, tracing paper, robin blue, kerosene, design, paraffin, honeycomb wax, resin, cloth, brush, stove and frame. We have to draw the design well on the cloth with the help of a pencil, carbon or tracing paper where we want to wax the cloth. By perforating the tracing paper and wetting a piece of light cloth in robin blue and kerosene oil together, if we rub it on the tracing paper, the design would appear on the cloth. We have to frame the cloth tightly with the frame or by pinning it. Then we have to mix 250 grams of paraffin, 125 grams of honeycomb wax and 62 grams of resin in a cooking pot. Pouring a teaspoonful of water into the mixture and heat that on a burning stove. When the mixture melts down, we have to take out the melted wax to another pot slowly. The wax would not be blackened if you do this. After that, we have to coat the melted wax carefully on the design with the help of a painting brush. If you coat wax on to a wrong place, you can remove the wax by putting a blotting paper on that spot and hot ironing on top of it. Instead of using a brush, you can use a jaunting as well to coat the wax on the cloth after pouring liquid wax into it. After you have finished waxing a side of the cloth, you have to do the same on the hide side. After turning the cloth upside down, you have to coat wax onto the design again for the second time. After waxing, you have to keep the cloth at a shady place for 12 hours or you can wet the cloth in water for an hour and then you can dye the cloth after the wax dries. You can buy many colorful dyes in the market or you can make it for yourself too. To make it yourself, you have to buy five colors. They are red, blue, yellow, purple and black. You can make new colors following the process mentioned in the chart below. If you do the batik printing business, how about I help you with that? How exactly? I will supply you with the dyes and designs for your batik printing job. So you want some business too? Yes, I have some savings from the salary I get from working for Sister Kohinor. I will supply dyes and designs to you investing that money and that way we can both benefit. And how exactly am I benefitted? Well, you don't have to make long tracks to the district centers. You will get the materials at market price plus. I will also help you prepare the colors however and whenever you want it. Is that true? Do you really know how to make colors? Quiz me if you don't believe me. Okay, tell me how to make the color orange. If you mix two portions of yellow with one portion of red, then the color of the dye would be orange. Nearly an hour is needed in steps to dye clothes in Prussian method. At first you have to sink the cloth in normal water for 10 minutes. Then mix dye in 62 ml of hot boiled water in a pot. Pour the dyed water in a big pot at normal water with the dyed emulsion as needed so that the cloth you will dye can be adequately sunk in that emulsion. Pour the cloth in it wet and stir it well for 15 minutes. Now take out the cloth from the bucket. Add 9 teaspoons full of salt in that emulsion and sink the cloth again in that dyed water and let it get wet and start that for 15 more minutes. Now take out the cloth from the bucket. Add 2 teaspoons full of soda in that dyed water sink the cloth again in that soda add it dyed water and keep it there for 15 minutes. After that stir the cloth and keep it in that emulsion again for 15 minutes. After that take out the cloth from the dyed water and compress the cloth lightly. Now take normal water as needed so that the cloth can be properly sunk. Add dyeing fixol similar to the amount of dyes you have used to prepare the color earlier in the water and mix it properly. Sink the cloth in that mixture and keep it there for 30 minutes. Dyeing fixol is used to make the temporary dye permanent. Now let the wet cloth drop down the water it contains by hanging it on a nylon rope after taking it out from the dyed water. Dry the cloth well at a shady place for 24 hours. You have to sink the cloth for 30 minutes in normal water for the removal of the wax from the dried cloth. Continue washing the cloth in normal water as long as dyes are sink coming off the cloth. Wash the cloth again and again until clear water emerges from the cloth. Take 3 to 4 liters of hot boiled water in a cooking pot. Dissolve and mix one fourth of a washing soap into that water. Put the cloth into that hot water when the soap is adequately mixed while the cloth for 10 to 15 minutes. After all the wax does not remove properly, repeat the process. After all the wax is removed, wash the cloth again in normal water and dry it at a shady place. Gum the cloth, dry the gummed cloth at a shady place and iron it. And this is when the whole batik printing process will finish. The methods of multi-colored batik print are if we want to dye different parts of the cloth's design we have to put it in the light colors of dyes first and then the darker colors gradually. For example, if we would like to dye our cloth in four colors such as white, yellow, green and red, we have to draw the four color design on a piece of white cloth first and then we have to decide as to which color would we like to apply on which part of the design. Now we have to wax and dry the part of the design that we would want to stay white. Now we have to follow the process of Prussian dyeing method to get the cloth dyed in yellow. After the yellow color on the cloth dries we have to cover the part with coats of wax including the white part design and then we have to apply blue dye on the cloth following the same process. The cloth will get green colored after mixing yellow and blue on it. Now we have to cover the white, yellow and green part of the cloth with coats of wax and dye it in red. We have to remove the wax from the cloth following the guidelines of removing wax as described earlier. We have to wash the cloth well in normal water and gum it. For that we have to dry the four color dyed cloth keeping that at a shady place and lastly we have to iron it when it dries. We can also make batik prints on different parts of your cloth by painting it with a brush. Draw the design on the surface of the cloth. Decide the colors of the paints that you want to apply on different parts of the cloth. Now paint the parts of the design as per your choice of colors. Keep a newspaper under the cloth while painting. Get the cloth dry in a shady place after coloring it. Cover all the painted and dried colors with wax. After the wax gets dry sink it in color dyed water of another who. The color you will get because this is the color of the body of the cloth. Remove the wax from the color and get it dried. At last get it iron and fold neatly. Remember you have to dip the cloth for a day in water so that there are no granules or crystals remaining. When you make batik prints using fine gum. If you want to do the job quickly you can use alginate instead. If you want to dye your cloth with very high quality it is better to do that using neptal method. Sil cloths are usually dyed and batik printed in this method. Print your cloths well after you have finished making the batik prints on them. You have to fold the cloth neatly and properly. Pack them up nicely so that the cloths remain clean and in good condition. Packaging them well will attract more customers and you will also get a good price for it. There is high demand for these kinds of products both with the wholesalers and the retailers. Plus they are also very popular in many different fairs and temporary bazaars. You have to spend $37,542 to make batik prints on 75 saris. You can earn a profit of about $15,000 in a month by selling those saris. Now let us see how the profit can be made. The income and expenditure accounts of 75 saris print. Hello there Deepak. Parvati How are you? We are very well now sister by your blessings of course what would have happened to us if you didn't teach us batik print. Sister, we got your present. Wow! It's a batik printed saris. How nice! No no no I can't take this. You would miss out on selling it. No no, please do accept our gift I insist. Sister, they would get hurt if you don't take it. Sister, because of you we are now the owner of a batik printing factory. Start your own batik printing job and breeze of happiness will enter your home. It is easy and profitable highly to be poverty in your family.