This is the one I really, really am watching. And NVIDIA, you know, NVIDIA looks super good, right? Welcome to Access a Trader, the number one community for those who are committed to taking control of their trading in order to achieve success, profitability, and longevity. Thank you for joining us. Here's Dan Shapiro to help you find your edge, master your process, and own your future. Hey, guys, good evening, everybody. Welcome to another edition of the Access a Trader.com nightly wrap-up show. Hope everybody did very, very well today. So we'll talk about the pivots in a second. So 10% move in the NASDAQ, in the QQQs, off the lows of March the 15th, right? This is going on to week three. Big 10% move. The question was, what was going to happen this week? And obviously, this big area of supply that we talked about in the nightly video, on the weekend video, was going to be a very, very important choice of either defense or reclaim. And obviously, we know what happened here with the closing prices, big, big move, again, 200 points on the NASDAQ composite. But the story going into this week, right? If you watched last night's video, was those stocks that had the big moves, your Amazons of the world, your Teslas of the world, your Microsofts of the world, everything basically we talked about on yesterday's video, right? That was the focal point. We didn't know if they were going to go today. We didn't know if they were going to go this week. But the point is, again, it's not guessing, right? It's all about being prepared for price action and letting it wait and confirm. And when you saw today's action, and again, I know a lot of the retail crowd is really, really concentrated on the game stops of the world and the AMCs of the world. Congratulations. Listen, you got your win, right? You got your win. This is a phenomenal two-week move. You should be incredibly happy, ecstatic, all those words. But the most important thing is to know when you win, right? Know when you win. They're not going to the moon. They're going higher. They're going higher. You're in tremendous momentum. Enjoy this momentum and be smart about it.  Again, like I said, we'll get to the pivots in a second. Went absolutely bananas today. It started on the heels of the game stops, the heel of the AMCs of the world. When you saw the call-buying, the aggressive call-buying that came into the name, they were coming for the 30s. They were coming for the 80s, for the 80 calls for January. I mean, it's a little ambitious, but that's what really starts to get these things off. But the major story continued to be the names that had the big runs last week that rested and then continue today. And that was a major key today. And it's setting up some phenomenal action for tomorrow. And we talked about Tesla. And let me just say this, I love Tesla. I don't think anybody on the planet, for the exception of Elon and all his offsprings, love Tesla more, I love Tesla, long, short and different. But I tell you one thing, they have, when this is all set and done, and we don't know how this is gonna end, but when this is all set and done, this company is very, very creative for them. From all the oops, we leaked our earnings or oops, it was an internal memo that got leaked. Oops, oops, oops, oops, right? For a company that is so advanced and so amazing, they sure as hell do something really asinine, right? And today was something that I personally have never seen since I've been on social media before. Usually when a company comes out with a two, well, any type of stock split, right? Usually what they do in the series of events is they go in front of the board, they're bored and they say, hey, look, we believe on the best interests of the shareholders, we want to issue more shares so we can make it more attractive. So we wanna split it two for one, three for one, four for one, recently you saw Amazon and Google do 24 one splits. But you never see ever, ever, ever, ever. You never see companies tweet at hey, by the way, we're sending a memo to the board to see if they wanna split again. Wait, what? The person who's in charge of the Tesla Twitter account, before you press send, I'm just curious, what did you think was gonna happen to the price of the stock when you sent out this tweet? And yada, yada, yada, that's what happened. Tesla went out of its mind, shoot first, ask questions later when people see things like split or equity, private equity talk or chatter, blah, blah, blah. They don't care, right? Sweets first, shoot first, ask questions later. That's exactly what happened. But I think the more important plays of the day were the names that had the big, big runs last week. They consolidated for two, three days and they're ready to go. We talked about Amazon on the weekend video, how important this 200 day moving average was, the stock exploded today. I think the stock tomorrow, well, again, assuming the market continues, the market could have a res day. But if this thing consolidates, you could see 3,400, 3,450s next measured potential, right? A name like Microsoft. Again, we talked about on the weekend video, it rested, had nice consolidated rest. We saw it today right from the opening gate. Stock took out last week's channel that 305, 306 level. They started coming for the 310 calls right out the gate. We saw 312 and a halfs and the stock just went absolutely ballistic. Again, this thing confirms tomorrow. I think this thing could see 3,14, 3,15 tomorrow. You know, just really, really strong moves. You had the meme stock, zone nuts. You had the semiconductors waking back up again. And this is really what a violent bull market action looks like, which is so ironic because again, up to two weeks ago, we had a very, very aggressive cell bias action, which was great as well. So the market continues to be good. Like I said, from Thursday's video into Friday, you don't need to be creative, right? You might not want to look at the stocks that are up 15, 20 days in a row, but there's a lot of names coming out of the channels. Like I believe Microsoft goes higher. I think maybe Tesla rests again, but Tesla looks like it wants to see that, you know, wants to see that really big aggressive channel here 11, 20, 11, 50, that looks higher. Amazon, I think tomorrow, if this thing dips into rising support, I think this thing sees 34, 50. This is the one I really, really am watching. And NVIDIA, you know, NVIDIA looks super good, right? Maybe it doesn't go tomorrow. Maybe it doesn't go the next day, but I'm telling you, man, this thing is consolidating. It's consolidating nicely off the latest supply, off the last run, and they are coming for, when I say they, I don't know who they are, but everybody uses the word they, so why am I any different? But they were coming for the 300 weeklies when the stock was at 274 today, nonstop, 290, 300. So this is definitely one to watch for the next couple of days. Google, I like this Google, right? Looks ready to go as well. It's consolidating the same way as NVIDIA was consolidating, as Microsoft was consolidating. This damn thing looks really, really good, right? I mean, it's one of those names that again, it doesn't trade as great as you'd like, but when this thing consolidates, boy, this thing consolidates, even this BBBY, right? Broke out today aggressively. Listen, any dips tomorrow into rising 60 minutes support, and if this thing starts confirming today's channels, why can't this thing see 27, 28, 30, right? To the moon, diamond hands, right? All that stuff. This is the market. This is a hot market right now. So if you're gonna be in a hot market, take advantage of the hot name. So the market looks good. You know, market looks good. Again, is it possibility we get a quiet day tomorrow, a little bit of a rest day? Yeah, sure, everything's possible, but the point is, again, get your research down, look for the names that are coming out of tight channels, and when these things confirm, especially with option order flow, continuing one behind the other, behind the other, behind the other, those are the names that might be the ones that really can take off. So let's talk about it today, right? Again, it was all about technology today, one by one by one, 305, right? 305.5, 306 needs to build on Microsoft. Again, we talked about it a few minutes ago. This was a great, great move. There wasn't even a down tick to 310, how awesome the move was. It literally just came out of the channel and just went straight up on, I mean, look at that first candle. Look at this first candle, man, this is awesome. 306 to 310 on the first candle, just phenomenal. Absolutely phenomenal move on Microsoft. I still like this thing, goes higher. Intel 52 needs to build, never got there. This was definitely the move of the day, and the most important move of the day because it reclaimed the 200-day moving average.  Amazon was awesome today, absolutely awesome. Closed right at the high of the day, took out the 3330 and just literally closed within a dollar of the high of the day. Just an absolutely just boss move. I think this thing sees 3,400, 3,450 before this story is told. LRCX again got rejected for the third time, 557, go daddy, never got to this 86,450 base. 84, here is Microsoft, 308.40s, 310 next stop, that's exactly where it went. Here comes Amazon, Google, I love this Google, it's just a matter of when. This snow, another perfect example, again, option water flow. Again, I didn't think it was gonna extend this much this afternoon, but it did. 232 needs to build, they're coming for the 340 weeklies coming in. I still like this snow for tomorrow. It took out the 32, traded all the way up to 38 and change. This thing starts building tomorrow, you could see 350. Very, very good looking chart as well. And here is, again, here's the memes, right? Nobody makes fun of the memes. We make, nobody makes fun of the memes, let's be nice. So BBBY 2380, 24 needs to build. There's a sneaky area there on the 60 minute view. 2480 becomes a big daily spot. This has a January call buyer coming in for the 80 calls. That's not a misprint. So here was BBBY, right? Here's the sneaky pivot I was talking about right here. This 2380, 24, it took that out, took out 2480 and went almost to 27 after hours, just incredible move. Just absolutely incredible move on BBBY. NVIDIA never obviously got down to the 271 level, but I will be watching the video for the next couple of days. And if this thing confirms the macro channel, this thing will go and it will go very, very aggressively. So that's it, right? That's it. We got a good market. We got a bull market. We got whatever you want to call it. The most important thing is looks like there's something there for everyone. The most important part is don't get blinded by the lights, don't get excited about the euphoria. Trade every single trade based on your comfort level. And if you're not comfortable, don't put on the trade. Again, you don't need to trade every single day. You're just looking for value and executing based on technical analysis. Guys, have a great night. God bless and I will see you all tomorrow.


Hi everybody, I'm Aksana, and today I will present our paper with John Canetti about Incarcerable MPC. So what is Incarcerable MPC? In this MPC, you have standard correctness guarantees, and in addition, you have a stronger security guarantee, which is called Incarcerability. Intuitively, this guarantee tells you that parties can freely lie about their inputs and outputs in the protocol. In particular, the adversary may first listen to the communication in the protocol, and then it can approach any party, or even all parties, and demand to know what are their inputs, outputs, and randomness in the protocol. And the protocol is called Incarcerable if it comes with additional fake algorithm, which can produce fake coins to every party, which looks like a real randomness in that protocol. In this talk, we will look at two main scenarios. One is called Cooperative Incarcerability, and it only gives protection when all parties simultaneously lie or simultaneously tell the truth. This still can be good enough in many scenarios when parties are working together against some external attacker. Still, it will lose Incarcerability properties if some party decides to disclose its true coins and some other party decides to disclose its fake coins. This could happen, for example, from lack of coordination, or if some party decides to turn against the other. That's why we are also looking at a stronger notion called Full Incarcerability, which even gives you protection in this mixed scenario. We capture Incarcerability in the standard real ideal world paradigm. In the ideal world, there is no transcript of communication, and there is no randomness of parties. Only inputs and outputs exist. In particular, the cursor in this case will only know fake inputs and fake outputs of the parties, and it has no other choice other than to trust parties. Still, if the parties' inputs and outputs are inconsistent, the adversary will know that some parties align. Yet, it won't know which exactly parties align, and it won't know which values are true and which are fake, and what are the real values. So, this is the best possible security we would like to achieve with our protocols as well. Incarcerability is known to imply adaptive security. Let me remind you what adaptive security is. Adaptively secure adversary can corrupt parties during and after the execution of the protocol, and this boils down to the following syntactic requirement on the simulator. So, the simulator should be able to first simulate the transcript T without knowing any inputs or outputs of the party, and then later, given some inputs and outputs, it should come up with fake coins, which are consistent with that transcript T. It is easy to show that Incarcerable Protocol is also adaptive-secure, so this is because adaptive simulator can simply simulate the transcript by generating an honest transcript on input 0. And later, when it's time to open the randomness, it can run the faking algorithm to come up with fake coins consistent with any input and output. Note, however, that Incarcerable Protocols are stronger than adaptive-secure protocols, and intuitively, this is because in Incarcerable Protocols, you have to open some real computation in a different way, while in adaptive-secure protocols, you only have to open simulated computation in some different way. For instance, let's look at Incarcerable Avriliva's transfer. Like in standard OT, here you have a sender with two inputs and the receiver with a choice bit B, and you want the receiver to learn M sub B. In addition, both parties are equipped with faking algorithms. For example, the faking algorithm of a sender takes as input everything the sender knows, including the target fake values, and it outputs some fake coins which are consistent with the transcript and those fake values. It's important that the faking procedure of every party is local, and only uses the values known to that party. What about security? No matter what are the fake inputs and outputs, we want to require as much protection as possible. This means that if the values are consistent, then we want the joint distribution of randomness of both parties to look indistinguishable from the true randomness. If the values are not consistent, still we want to hide as much as possible, in particular we want to hide who is lying and what are the true values. Let me know that it's very important that the receiver faking algorithm takes as input the fake output Y prime of OT. If it didn't, you would actually show that the resulting randomness could be used even by semi-honest receiver to violate the sender's privacy by obtaining the other bit. We know that static oblivious transfer implies static MPC and the same holds for adaptive oblivious transfer, so it's natural to ask whether incursable OT also implies incursable MPC, and the answer is we don't know. Let me roughly outline what the problem is. The problem is with coordination. For example, look at GMW protocol. In GMW protocol, parties hold shares of the value of each wire in the circuit. If parties want to fake it, they will need to locally generate shares which add up to some wire value of f of x1 prime x2 prime. The problem is that either party knows these fake values and they will have to do it locally. So it's not clear how to achieve this, and I think it's an interesting open problem. Let me briefly mention prior work on incursable MPC. In this work, we will look at what's called semi-honest coercion, which is also known as receipt-free-ness in voting literature. Basically, it says that parties follow the protocol and adversary only comes at the end and demands to see the state of each party. In this setting, we knew a protocol which can protect up to half participants, and some recent protocols which are actually devised for adaptive security also can withstand up to one coercion. Thus, a natural open question which we'll be tackling in this work is can we achieve semi-honest incursability for all parties? Let me mention that there is another line of work on what's called an active coercion. In this type of coercion, the adversary can force parties to deviate from the protocol, and in particular it can try to force parties to output something committing to their inputs. It was shown back in the 90s that such security actually requires some inaccessibility assumption like a voting booth or hardware token. This notion, although it seems stronger, actually turns out to be incomparable to semi-honest coercion, and roughly the reason is that in semi-honest coercion, the main problem we want to solve is how to invert the computation, make it look like it stems from a different input. In active coercion, inaccessibility assumptions avoid this problem altogether, so they have different issues in that line of work. Finally, let me mention some prior work on deniable encryption. Deniable encryption is a special case of semi-honest incursable to PC, and in particular the lower bound for deniable encryption, which says that you need at least three rounds of communication, immediately translates into the lower bound for incursable MPC. At the same time we know some positive results for deniable encryption, in particular in this work we will be using a bi-deniable encryption of Kanati, Park and Pavorina from 2013. This construction takes three messages and requires the CRS. Finally, let me mention our results. Our first result is a transformation from deniable encryption with special properties into incursable ambiguous transfer. This immediately gives you incursable to PC for short domain. Our second result is how to use deniable encryption to turn adaptively secure MPC with some properties into cooperatively incursable MPC. Finally, we show a certain lower bound. We show that protocols with some communication patterns cannot be incursable. So these are our results and now let me briefly mention each result separately. So first, how to translate any deniable encryption into incursable T. Let me first describe the building block and what exactly properties we want from this deniable encryption. Let me remind you that deniable encryption is basically a protocol which allows parties to transmit a message, such that both parties can later claim some fake plaintext M' and here are the properties we will require. The first property is called public receiver deniability. Basically, this property says that any party or outsider can fake on behalf of the receiver. In particular, knowledge of the true coins of the receiver are not required to fake. The second property we need is called obliviousness of the receiver. This means that the receiver can actually generate its only message, the second message, without knowing the underlying coins are. This can be alternatively stated as follows. Receiver can participate in deniable encryption in two different ways. One way would be a normal way where the receiver picks its coins and generates everything properly, and then these coins could be used for decryption. The other way is oblivious way, where the receiver doesn't choose coins are, but instead it will generate second message obliviously, let's say at random, and in particular it won't be able to decrypt the resulting transcript. Armed with these two properties, you can probably already see how we build our incursible OT. Indeed, the sender and the receiver should engage in two parallel executions of deniable encryption, where in the first execution the sender sends M0, and in the second execution it sends M1, and the receiver should participate in one execution normally, such that it is able to decrypt, and in the other execution it should participate obliviously, such that it cannot decrypt. In particular this means that the receiver can obtain exactly one plain text out of the two. And let's talk about how parties can fake their inputs. The sender randomness consists of two random coins used in deniable encryption, and therefore the faking procedure for the sender is pretty straightforward. It should just use sender fake of deniable encryption. What about the receiver? So the receiver randomness consists of two things. First, it is the true random coins used in the normal execution of deniable encryption, and second, it's the randomness used to generate the second message in the oblivious generation of deniable encryption. Thus to lie about the bit B, the receiver has to lie about which transcript was oblivious and which was real. And you can probably already see how to fake for the receiver. So first, the receiver should claim that the first execution was oblivious, and that it had never generated R sub R. Second, it should claim that the second execution was normal, and to come up with corresponding coins R, it should use receiver fake of deniable encryption on the transcript T for the desired output Y. So this is how to obtain incursible OT. And the incursible OT immediately gives incursible to PC for short domain of one party, and our scheme takes three rounds and requires a serious model because of the deniable encryption requirements. Now let's move on to the second result, which says that you can compile any adaptively secure MPC with certain properties using deniable encryption into a cooperatively incursible MPC. So let's start with a natural attempt, which is take any multi-party computation and let parties encrypt every message sent using deniable encryption. Essentially, deniable encryption erases any communication which happened, and indeed the results in protocol will be incursible but just for one party. For example, if the adversary comes to P1 and demands to see some inputs and outputs of computation, P1 can always lie about the transcript of underlying MPC. In particular, if P1 wants to pretend that the input was zero, it can simply generate fresh messages of T consistent with zero. The problem with this, however, is that the protocol only withstands one coercion. So for example, if the adversary now comes to the second party, the second party is in trouble. Actually, there are two problems. First problem is the problem of coordination. Second party has no idea what the first party claimed as the transcript of underlying MPC, and those two guys have to be consistent. Second problem is the problem of equivocation. The second guy has to be able to equivocate T to his own fake input. Let us first deal with the second issue. The solution is to use adaptively secure MPC. In particular, when parties need to reveal T, they will generate T to be a simulated transcript of underlying MPC.  In fact, we need a stronger property from the underlying MPC. Intuitively, the issue is that in incursible MPC, every party should fake locally without knowledge of other parties' inputs and outputs. Unlike adaptive MPC, where the simulator can actually use the knowledge of all parties' inputs in order to simulate. So the protocol consists of two parts. In one part, parties are actually running the underlying MPC with transcript T encrypted under deniable encryption. And the second part is coordination part. It's only there to help parties to fake. There, one party's AP1 sends to everybody the same simulated transcript T' together with corresponding trapdoor TD. Let's first look at what happens at the coercion when parties decide to be honest. First, parties will claim that they send and receive messages of T and they will disclose that two coins are in the protocol. In the second part, parties will honestly disclose that they have received or sent T' together with the trapdoor. And it is important that T and T' which the adversary sees are completely independent. What happens when parties decide to fake? Well, in the first part, parties gonna claim that they sent and received the messages of T'. And they're gonna use the trapdoor to come up with simulated coins R' consistent with this T'. However, what should they do with the second part? If they reveal honestly that they have received T', then the adversary will be able to link T' used in the first part and in the second part and that would be a total fail. Therefore, intuitively, they should claim some other T' which should be completely independent of the claimed T'. However, now we are back to square one because how do parties agree on this T', it should be the same for every party. And of course, we could try to let P1 send T' together with T'. But now, parties have to reveal two transcripts and one of them should be some T'. So, we didn't really solve the problem. The problem can be described as follows. P1 should send some value which should carry two pieces of information at the same time. First piece will be a fake value which parties will have to claim they have received from P1. And the second part is the actual simulated transcript which they will use to deny. And the problem is that the fake value has to be of the same size as the real value which doesn't quite work out as you can see in this picture. But this is actually very easy to solve with compression with a simple PRG. P1 should actually send a PRG seed to all the parties, the same seed. And then each party including P1 itself can stretch this PRG seed into a pseudo-random value.  Fake seed is what every party is going to claim they have received in the protocol from P1. And simulation randomness Rc can be further expanded into the simulated transcript T' together with the simulated trapdoor. And this is pretty much the whole protocol. The final protocol is very close to what we had before with the difference that P1 should send the seed encrypted under denial encryption and transmitted to everyone. It should be the same seed transmitted to every party. And note that this seed is completely independent from the transcript T'. When it is time to fake, parties are going to do the following. First, they will use the PRG to expand the received seed into a stream which they interpret as seed' and randomness of simulation. They use this randomness of simulation to come up with the fake transcript T' and they can use the corresponding trapdoor to find the coins R' consistent with the new input. When asked about what they have received from P1, they will claim that they have received seed'. Note that in this coercion scenario seed' and T' are also independent at least to a computational adversary because these two values are basically the output of the same PRG. So this concludes the description of the protocol. Let me just mention that we want the underlying adaptive MPC to have two properties. First property is the corruption oblivious simulation I talked about earlier. And the second property is that the CRS has to be global if the protocol uses the CRS. As a result, we are getting cooperatively incursible MPC in the CRS model which takes four rounds of communication. Finally, let me talk about our lower bound. Let me first start with some motivation. The MPC protocol I just described was only cooperatively incursible. How about full incursibility? The first attempt would be to start with deniable encryption which is actually fully incursible and tweak it just a little bit to get fully incursible MPC. The idea in the underlying deniable encryption is roughly as follows. The sender should send a hash of the message in the encryption of the message and the receiver will send a hash of its randomness and then there will be a special program which decrypts for the receiver. And this gives rise to a very natural attempt to build MPC which is designate one party as the receiver, make all other parties senders and let them in a similar manner send the hash of all their inputs and then send their inputs encrypted and then have the receiver use this program to basically evaluate the result. This is maybe very promising but our lower bounds says that this protocol cannot be incursible. Let me now describe it more precisely. First we will call a party lazy if it only sends messages in the first and in the last round. In all other rounds it only listens and computes but doesn't talk. Our theorem states that if a protocol is for at least three parties and among these parties there is at least one lazy party and at least one other party which received the output then the protocol cannot be incursible even against just two coercions. In particular in our example from the last slide you can see that all the senders are lazy. They only send messages in the first and last round. Therefore this protocol cannot be incursible. Finally let me show some examples and discuss why this theorem is tied. First the requirement that n is at least three is important because we actually do get a two-party computation which is incursible with lazy parties. Same way the requirement to have lazy parties is important because our NPC doesn't have any lazy parties and it is incursible for n mon three. Finally the requirement that the protocol should be incursible as opposed to just adapt to be secure is also very important because we do know protocols which are adaptively secure which follow this lazy party communication pattern. And finally let me just note that in the original paper of Connecticut narrow they also don't have any lazy parties and thus the theorem doesn't apply to them as well. Let me conclude the talk with some open problems and random faults. So we do get cooperatively incursible NPC and fully incursible 2PC. This gives rise to a natural question can we get fully incursible NPC. There might be some reason why it's not so easy to obtain which has something to do with coordination issues. So ideally we would like to use deniable encryption as a building block but then parties will need to somehow agree on the values they send or received using deniable encryption. And this gives some coordination problems. The alternative way would be to build incursible NPC from the grounds up without using deniable encryption as a building block but this could be fairly complicated. Another open problem is can we get incursible NPC in three rounds because our protocol uses four rounds and we know that it is impossible to get in two rounds. One issue with that could be that deniable encryption itself probably requires three rounds and therefore in our three round protocol only the last message could be protected by deniable encryption. However other messages have to also be input dependent and at the same time deniable but they cannot be protected with deniable encryption. So these are the open problems I have for you. Thank you very much for your attention and feel free to stay for a cat blooper. Bye-bye. Fake shares which together add up to some value of the wire of the computation f of x1, x2.


Ladies and gentlemen, Salah Mike back with another video and today we are going to talk about the recent episode of Joe Rogan who had a guy known for a very long time, Robert Oberst, world's strongest man, competitor, insane athlete, insane presser, insane strongman, and they chatted about a variety of topics, but the one of course that pertains to us, that absolutely went viral, is that Robert in the video says, you should not do deadless. He basically says that if your goal is to get better at the deadlift and you're deadlifting for deadlift's sake, go ahead and then he talks about his experience playing college football, obviously being world's strongest man, competitor, and coaching football at the highest level, strength and conditioning. Coaches and athletes across the board, and he mostly just said football will do a hand clean, power clean, and no deadlifts will be found. Basically saying that the risk to reward of the deadlift, and I believe he mentions the lower back injury rate, is too high to get the benefit, or again the risk reward is just not worth it for you. And of course we got a hot take.  You know, I've deadlifted for a very long time to get better at deadlift, and I've also deadlifted for a little bit shorter amount of time in my early 20s just to get better at basketball. Squatting, deadlifting, doing a bunch of strength training in hopes to go back and play college basketball again as a base of my strength training routine. And there are some things that are true with everything we do. Anything in the gym, any athletic sport, strongman, especially basketball, football, the risk to reward may just not be there in general. You know, there's a high injury rate in all team sports, any contact sports, any lateral sports, and there's also a decent injury rate in all strength sports. Powerlifting actually being the least, if I'm not incorrect, we just recently had Eric Helms on 50% of facts, and he said there's a study done on the injury rates from weightlifting, strongman, powerlifting, as well as team sports and bodybuilding. And the lowest is bodybuilding, and then I believe next is powerlifting, which is like 2% or something of that nature, or 2 out of 1000, don't quote me. And then the higher rates were actually strongman and weightlifting. So to say in just blanket statement anything is just, I guess, what bugs me, because the truth is once you gather enough knowledge, enough experience in multiple categories that there is just no black and white in this, and we've talked about that a lot with technique, nutrition. There are some rules with everything we do, but there's no fine line drawn in the sand with everything we do, because the example that deadlifts are wrist reward, not good enough for your back. And then showing the example of power cleans and a hang clean, which is obviously, yes, the load is less, but the hip hinge is still there, the explosive movement, plus the rack position. There's just as many injuries, if not more, that are possible doing those movements. Second week of me doing power cleans, I jammed my wrist so bad, I couldn't sleep at night, it was hurting. And is that an injury? No, it was just hurt. But just that one sample for what you guys, the examples I'm bringing out. The other main thing that pops in my head is at every college, one, I don't know because I haven't been to everyone, but I'd imagine they're doing some kind of press, a squat, a barbell back squat, and then the hang clean or power clean for the majority of team athletes. And we could easily point to the squat being just as potentially dangerous as the deadlift in a variety of factors, obviously the low back, legs, knees, ankles, especially with the deadlift, the squat, the power clean, these more complex movements that you load heavier. If they're not taught properly with proper technique, proper supervision, as well as proper programming, then of course the injury rate is going to go up for any athlete. And of course maybe the risk to reward is not there because we want you sacking the quarterback if you're a linebacker running the football, if you're running back and if you're injured from lifting, that's not going to help. What we want is everything in the gym to be an accessory, to supplement your athleticism, your strength, and maybe some injury prevention or lower the risk of injury by getting a little bit stronger, a little bit more mobile in the gym so that you can have a longer, more high-performing career on the field, on the court, on the baseball diamond, etc. Now I think the biggest factor in all of it is proper loading, proper technique, and also proper supervision. Having a good coach to cue you the right things. When you have good form, yes, you can still get hurt with hypothetically the most perfect technique in all these lifts, but the rate does go down. And from my experience, I've talked to some really, really good strength coaches. Shout out to Joe Ken, who's, you know, NFL strength performance coach of the year for the North Carolina Panthers. And as a variety of other ones, my boy Ramsey at the Sacramento Kings who are very, very high level, very intelligent, very well-thought-out planned coaches. And I've also seen and talked to some that maybe aren't as well-thought-out experienced or knowledgeable in the case. And they may have, you know, some of their athletes with improper technique, no real guidelines or programming, so they're just maxing out all the time. And of course the risk is going to go up there. The last factor that I want to talk about is variations. We just blanket statement deadlift and blanket statement squat and blanket statement press, but the thing is with athletes, depending on the athlete, depending on the sport, depending on their build or mobility, their injury, their past injuries, et cetera, et cetera, we have so many different variations and I think that every athlete does need to do some kind of squat, some kind of hip hinge or deadlift, if you want to call it, and then some kind of press. And what those might be and what they may look like are different, but there's a million variations, you know, with a really taller athlete or less mobile athlete. Maybe we do something from a block. Maybe we're doing some sumo. Maybe we're doing a trap bar elevated. Maybe we're loading with bands, a little bit more band weight than straight weight to allow them to have a safer, safer, more comfortable, better technique starting position while the load is lighter and then the load will obviously get progressively heavier as you pull on the band. There's a lot of variations and I can't say exactly which, obviously, because I would need to know what athlete or an example that I'm talking about. So I'm just throwing out ideas of ways that someone would still hip hinge or deadlift and still make a lot of progress with the triple extension. My argument, which I've talked about many times in this video, too, would actually be counter to that, where I think the weightlifting movements, which are arguably the most technical strength and conditioning movements, the clean and jerk, power clean, whatever you want to say and snatch, the power clean in particular or the hang clean are the most popular among a lot of strength and conditioning coaches or just old school football players, I think are so highly technical and can easily be replaced with a loaded throw, a kettlebell swing, even just like a clean pull or a snatch pull where you don't have to worry about the upper body mobility or the sheer force of snatching and grabbing a bar over your head where, again, they're not trying to be weightlifters, they're just trying to get better at their sport and you can get triple extension from a clean pull, a proper clean pull or a snatch pull holding onto the bar and obviously load it pretty dang heavy or a loaded throw, plyos, et cetera, and obviously all of these periodized and layered well would be optimal for most, but not all athletes are capable of doing every movement in the gym, so that's where coaching, strength and conditioning, adjustments come into play. Now, is deadlifting for everyone? I think for the average person, a deadlift is a great idea. We've been talking about athletes and things of that nature, the risk to reward and I think, obviously, the risk for a professional athlete and things that obviously goes higher because if you can't play your sport, you get injured or you're tweaked or you're not performing at a high level, you don't get paid and so your job's out and who knows the responsibilities you have with that? No income. For the average person, I think the deadlift is top of the food chain of what we need to focus on. When you talk about functionality, don't love that word but you're training a large group of muscles, you're training movements that you may do in regular life and I'm not the guy to say like, you have to deadlift 225 pounds so you can pick up your three-year-old. Is that correct? Kind of, but not really. But just moving in a hip hinge and a squat and a press, a couple variations of a row for the average person will, I believe, be the overall best for athleticism, the best for everyday life and the best in terms of longevity and the best in terms of aesthetics if you get a proper program and nutrition and start going down that road. Are there a risk to everything we do? There's a risk to everything we do.  Are you going to tell me the risk to a reward of riding my bicycle to the gym or around town running errands is not worth it? That's on an individual basis, I believe. I think that it is worth it for me and I think it is worth it for many to start to ride a bicycle, to get some cardiovascular conditioning, to get outside, to see nature rather than driving your car 10, 15 minutes away. And I believe the similar is with the deadlift but the average gen pop. Talking about people trying to get stronger, trying to feel good in the gym, trying to build a little bit of muscle and also functionality in their life that may turn into the weekend warrior sport. It may just turn into being a mom. It may just be you going straight to the couch afterwards but you got in that work and trained a large muscle group. Those are my thoughts on the deadlifts and why everyone should a deadlift. If you guys like this type of video, comment below what topic you want me to cover next. New vlogs, training vlogs all on the way. Until Mike, I'm out of here.


Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky met British Foreign Secretary James cleverly in Kiev on June 5 and discussed preparations for a NATO summit and Ukraine's efforts to end Russia's invasion. In remarks at the meeting, Zelensky thanked cleverly for Britain's continued support of Ukraine and discussed the supply of air defense systems following recent attacks by Russian missiles and drones. Cleverly's visit came as Russia reported that Ukraine has begun a counteroffensive, including Ukrainian Deputy Defense Minister Hannah Malier dismissed on Monday. Moscow said it had thwarted a major Ukrainian assault involving six mechanized and two tank battalions in the south of Ukraine's Donetsk region. Still giving, and we will prolong this support to Ukraine, and I want to thank for the last one. It's about opening a possibility for the Australian missions for our pilots on fighter jets, and also the possibility to open a discussion about coalition of patriots that is also very important. I'm happy that all the leaders understood that during this period of time when we have such big escalation by attacking of different kinds of rockets, and during all this period when we don't have air fighter jets, we need really something to glow the sky, and we understand the name of this something. It's genuinely lovely to have the opportunity to see you again. I'm dark, but this time I can see there's more life in the city. The traffic is heavier, which normally is a bad sign in a city, but I think for me it demonstrates what I've known to be true, and that is that the Ukrainian people are not going to allow themselves to be broken by this. I think you're very much leaving by example, but it's for me fascinating to watch the Ukrainian people, even though there are drone attacks, even though there are alarms going off through the night, even though Russia has tried throughout the winter to break the infrastructure of your country to break the will of your people, the Ukrainian people keep refusing to be broken, you're self included. And I have to say, it's a pleasure to come back to Kyiv when we made the commitment publicly that we would continue backing you and your country until you are victorious in your self defence. We meant it. When we said that we would do more and go further, we meant it. To make sure that it is an important, not just practical event, I'm willing to be true, and that is that the Ukrainian people can be the best soldiers that they can be. And so we're also deriving benefit from our close working relationship and we really value that.


Sup guys, thank you first and foremost for clicking on this video. Secondly, this video is proudly sponsored by none other than these guys, NordVPN. VPN stands for Virtual Private Network, a service that protects your internet connection and privacy online. Why might you want or need a VPN? You can mask your location and browse in complete privacy. It hides your IP address, so depending on what your profession is, you can't get traced or tracked. With the ability to connect to servers all over the world, you'll never be geo-restricted again. If you're in New Zealand, like me, you can watch US TV shows and vice versa. If you're in the States, you can even watch good old Kiwiana. But not only that, Netflix, YouTube, live sports events and social media networks. Whatever it is, whatever the country, you can access it. You can bypass annoying cookies and escape ad campaigns that won't leave you alone. The technology works by creating a network tunnel. Each and every time you surf the web, securing the data sent between you and your destination. They have a complete range of plans from one month to two years, whatever suits. They've always got new promotions running. At the moment, a two-year plan at 69% off works out to be $3.67 per month. That's just over 10 cents per day, guys. Go down into the description box below, click the link, check them out, support the channel. Happy days. Thanks, guys, and enjoy the video. What's up, guys? And welcome back to another episode of Rugby Player Reacts. I am your host, Jacob McDonald.  And in fact, last year's number one player on the list, Lamar Jackson. I've got his jersey thanks to one of my absolutely incredible subscribers, as you can see. And I must admit, it's always nice when you can actually wear the jersey of the player you're reacting to. It's a really nice touch, and I've got you guys to thank for that. But this video is not about you, and it's certainly not about me. It's about Lamar Jackson, probably the most exciting as far as running ability quarterback we've got in the league at the moment. I will admit, we did see a guy, Kyler Murray, who does seem to have, you know, footwork pretty similar in, you know, ability. I will say we've seen Kyler Murray, and his footwork looks, you know, if nothing else, on par with Lamar's. But for your everyday, you know, NFL level quarterback, you're really only going to see physical attributes like that on a wide receiver. And that's what makes him such an exciting player. That's what made him number one last year, but this year has dropped to 24. So if nothing else, it's going to be really interesting to hear what his fellow players have to say. Because it's not as if the season was unsuccessful. It's just that he didn't win a Super Bowl, and unfortunately, only one quarterback a year can do that. And this year it was the guy who'd already won six. Oh, head, Tom Brady. But this video ain't about Tom Brady either, although he's most probably coming further on in the list. This video is about Lamar Jackson. It's time we roll the intro and crack into it. Number five, the guy that was number one last year, Lamar Jackson. I got to see him just break the lead wide open and just prove everybody wrong that he can be a dynamic passer and runner. I mean, it's it's pretty inevitable, right? When you've got a running game like he does and you're playing quarterback in the NFL. And, you know, unfortunately, it probably doesn't matter how good his passing game ever gets. It's still going to be overshadowed by his ability on the feet. So I don't know. It's kind of a catch 22. Certainly is. No, no, you're so quiet. It'd be good to hear him on the hot seat. Everything, the clock, the play, the lateness, light it up and having a sense of that.  We're right with you, coach. Lamar Jackson's play leaves us all speechless. He's as quick as anybody on the field. He's got jets. Yeah. He has a spring in his step. That's for sure. Some of these jump cuts that he's done in the first two years in the league will be shown, you know, on highlight tapes for forever. And that's saying something. We got to make three guys miss. A lot of guys are blocked from Houdini. Jackson will keep another read option. He's got a hole. Leg raise 30. He's going to go. Steps up. Pocket collapsing. He escapes. He's to the 40 yard line. 35, 30. Lamar Jackson to the 20. Leg raise 10, 5. Touchdown. Faster than the whole team. What are you going to do? What are you going to do when the opposite quarterback is faster than your entire defense? That's, that's, that's what they call a cheat code, isn't it? And what happens when you cheat, the game becomes unfair. A lot of people can touch him on the field. And I don't think he's get enough credit to how great he is as a quarterback. Action Jackson. I mean, Lamar can do it all, man. We got a score right here, y'all boys. When it comes to the game of football, man, he's got it. Jackson throwing for the end zone. He's got it. Touchdown. Raven. A perfect over the shoulder throw. We was up at halftime and we came out and he ran the ball. He threw the ball. He did everything he could to win that ball game. And that's what happened. He came back from behind and won. That's methodical. Hey, that's MVP. I mean, it's just always a threat. You don't know how to really rush him. You rush high and he meets behind you.   It's tough. So it's like, you just got to decide on that play. What are we going to do with it? The most elusive player in the NFL right now is like a human joystick. Many of you, Jackson, as a magician or a living Chico, but his superhero identity is the most accurate. Like Superman running out of the locker room. Here comes Lamar Jackson. He comes back with a fourth and five. Takes the snap. Brown bring a blitz. Jackson rolls to the right. He's got a man open. I think he might have seen that one. This guy is for sure different. And I feel like he's just getting started. That's the talent that you can't teach. And that's the talent that's not going to be seen again for the next 15 years. Well, guys, I'm not going to lie. Last year's video on Lamar Jackson may have been about three times as long as that. All right. So what do we see there? Basic, classic Lamar Jackson play. Some in real time, some in slow mo.  He does it all. He's an absolute cheat code. And before we take off, let's have a look at his stats. Let's give him the time he deserves. He's 24. He's been in the league for three years. He's played 46 games. He's thrown for 7000 yards, including 68 receiving touchdowns. Did he win the MVP award? He did. That slipped my mind. He won the MVP award in 2019. He won the Heisman Trophy in 2016. He won the trophy for the 2020 version of this list. So to be fair, it's going to be tough for anybody to continue to up those standards.  He's as athletic as they come. And if anyone can, you know, reshape their game to whatever the defence throws at him, whether it be week to week or season to season, it's Lamar Jackson. So guys, that brings us to the end of another video. I'm going to shut it down completely for today. It's 5.30 at night and it's time to watch the news. Thanks for watching, guys. It is the 6th of September officially, and I'm out. Thanks, guys. Have a great night.


Choosing the Medical Arts CD program has combined anatomy and medical terminology to proliferate my love for medicine even more. This program has been the most gratifying as it's given me the opportunity to see the difference made in patients' lives, the relief you can see in their eyes, and the role you as a health care worker will forever hold in their lives. My name is Jasmine Casio and I'm a part of PCTI's Academy of Health and Medical Sciences.


What's up everybody, Jason here for jaspyscasebreak.com. 2023 Top Series 1, Baseball Jumbo just sold out, six box case break, two random teams each number five. And again guys, 15s of those spots, everybody gets two random teams in the MLB. Number all, card, ship, all teams in. Look for one autograph, one relic, one manufactured relic, 10 inserts and two silver packs per box guys. So here's the dice roll, here's the customer name. So we doubled up your names from Marcus down to Tristan. So you guys have two spots there. There's the teams. Let's click dice roll, let's roll it. Five and a six, 11 times, good luck. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 11 times Marcus down to Tristan. All right, 11 times. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10, 11, 11 times, 11 times. Texas Rangers down to the Detroit Tigers.  Good question, Tristan. I've only ever really wanted to work in sports. That's my passion, that's my love, right? I love sports. So if I didn't work in this, I don't even know what I'd be doing, man. You know, I kind of skipped out on the whole college experience, because I really wanted to be in this hobby after high school. Didn't really want to do the college experience, actually. So I don't know, I'd probably be doing a warehouse job or something. That's what I did, like, my senior year a little bit, and then at the end of senior year, I was working with my brother at his place. His job was also like a sports place called Sports Pins.  So it's funny, the jobs I've always ever had had to do with some kind of sport. But yeah, it was like a warehouse job. I was making metals, trophies, stuff like that. But I don't even know, man, honestly. I don't want to imagine that. But yeah, I just, I got heavily invested in the hobby like in 2011 after high school, and I was just flipping cards, setting up at shows for a while until I started working here in 2015. I love food too, Tristan, as you can see. I just, I would never, I was just never like a great cook. Like, definitely a good helper though. My wife is the cook. But I don't really know, man. I mean, I'd probably something like that. I'd probably, I mean, I have somewhat of a salesman's skill I guess now with this job, right? So, I don't know, maybe try something like that. But yeah, I'm enjoying the ride. Yeah, this is as close as to a dream job that I'd probably, whatever, imagined. I get to work with sports, get to talk sports. Obviously I love the hobby already, and I love that as a kid. So yeah, I mean, definitely. What I really wanted to do at one point, obviously, and everybody else, right? You have like a dream job is be like an Eagles reporter, right? Be like, you know, Saap Hamiltonian or something like that, you know? Just cover the Eagles, Hilver Filly full-time, just some of the Eagles fan. But obviously that requires a lot of time.  I decided to be cool to just interview players and coaches and, you know, that'd be it. So, I probably didn't think that one fully, but definitely the closest to a dream job for sure. All right, here we go, guys. So again, I actually haven't ripped too much. Too much of this. Obviously, you know, there's a handful of key rookies like Addy, Riley Greene, Nolan Gorman, Michael Harris, Gunnar Anderson. Obviously this is a very long time-consuming break, so obviously I'm gonna try to catch all those players, sleeve them up now, but if I miss any, do not worry, of course. The shipping team knows that we are sleeving and top-loading those key rookies and players, so everything shifts anyways, so I can say, don't worry.  I don't know if he'll be back, honestly.  I know he wants to be back, but I feel like, you know, obviously he has a big payday coming and I'm sure some teams will throw him a lot more money than the Eagles will. But definitely Hertz is up there. I love Jason Kelsey too, I've always loved him. I don't know if he's gonna come back though, man. My gut feeling says he will, because I think he knows how close the Eagles came and obviously they have an opportunity to potentially bring back the majority of their key players that are free agents and make another run, but at the same time, you know, he's been contemplating retirement for so long. I mean, at some point he's just gonna, obviously just say, hey man, it's time, but my gut feeling is Jason Kelsey will be back for one more season. They play the Chiefs next year in Kansas City, I think, or at home, either one, I don't remember which one it was. And I'm sure he would have loved another opportunity to play against his brother. But yeah, I know a lot of people, you know, it's so funny, like Jerry Jones and Stephen Jones, you know, Cowboys owner and GM was over here trying to compare the Eagles to like the Rams and all these other teams where they're all in, but are they really all in? I don't know how really all in, but they're gonna have like probably 30, 40 million dollars in cap space. You got two first round picks, you know, they'll be able to resign a lot of those key free agents.  So I think that was kind of funny. I wasn't really devastated Jose at all, I'm not gonna lie. I was having a great time with my family and friends and it was just such a close good game. I kind of predicted it once, you know, the Chiefs got into that field goal range and time was pretty much gonna start running out. I wasn't really devastated at all, man, honestly. I've had too many broken hard times with the Eagles in the early 2000s, like five straight years of heartbreak, so I'm kind of immune to that a little bit. All I know is I heard it's balled out that game and I was so happy that he came out to play and I'm sure you're into a lot of people's respect after that Super Bowl performance. There's Ruchman. Pick a game for a shot to win, Adley Ruchman. That's pretty cool. We have Patrick Wisdom, numbered, and Paul Seawald. Yeah, the NFC's is gonna be pretty competitive again, man, which I love it.   Yeah, I'm curious to see how the off season goes. Eagles have a lot of key free agents. I think a lot of them they will bring back, you know, and a couple of them will probably walk, which is fine, you know, but you got two first rounders to kind of replace Sonny Grey auto to replace potentially some pretty big key players, right? So Nolan Gorman. So if you lose out on a, on let's say like a Bradbury, right? Who wants to get paid? I think you go draft the Oregon cornerback, you know? Top 10.  Eagles do have a lot of depth though, so I'm not too worried. Yeah, I mean, this is a good chance, man. I think Houston, if they get the opportunity to draft Bryce Young, they definitely should because he is definitely ready to play. He's gonna be special, man. He's gonna be really good. One, two punch to 2.99, Robbie Ray, Luis Castillo, Aaron Henderson, Kiro Muto, into 2023, Santiago Ispinau, Relic there with Nolan Gorman for the St. Louis Cardinals, one of Marcus, JJ Belayde, Biggio Duran, and a 72 Blackboarder, Ryan Halsey, Rafael Devers, City Connect. Yeah, but Montes got injured though, right? That's obviously unfortunate. JJ Belayde. All right, let's go to the next box. So I'm gonna try to speed up just a little bit, guys. Like I said, if I do miss any of those top rookies that we're sleeping up, don't worry, of course, like I said, when they get sorted out, they will be sleeping top loaded, so do not worry. But I don't wanna be longer than over an hour doing this. I think Joe did about an hour, so gotta kind of keep it at the same pace. But we'll stop, of course, for all the number cards, short friends, autographs, relics, medallions. I know, let's see if that pays off to them, man. We've signed a lot of big-time players. It's a lot of money, but it's proven in the past since you gotta spend money to win. But most of the time, it doesn't always work in your favor. I actually won't be here next Saturday, so you'll probably see Chris covering me. I'm gonna head out to Arizona, visit my in-laws, but also hit up some Dodger spring training practice and a little spring training game. I think they play the Cubs on Sunday.  All right, here we go. Oh, it's just backwards. 2023, Nolan, Aaron Nolasarn. And Tom Glavin autograph for the Braves. Where's the electric, Tristan? The In-Lotter Braves, actually, there you go. To 4.99, Herrera, Cardinals. Michael Harris, that's a cool one right there. That's a gold foil. And then to 1.99, Blue Jays. Jorge Mateo, and then we got it right there, Kyle Schwerber, D-Man Cho, Joe Musgrove. Judge, Michael Harris there, Rookie, Liberator, and Storys. Just just some. Things are just toying with the ducks right now. It's my cousin right there, guys. Franchi Cordero. Got a little canvas there, Blue Jays, lunchman, Cuba Ruiz, Gregory Soto, 223 Salvador Perez, and Jeter Downs, rookie autograph there for the Red Sox, going to Tristan. At 4.99, Ryan Helsley, and Tristan McKenzie. Didn't see it.  Twins David, Judge Yankees, Rick Thomas, and then Bovards, Red Sox, Tristan. And Manufacturer, Patch Card, Peter Lonzo for the Metz, Carter. At 1.99, Ethan Small. All right, let's keep it going, guys. Next one, Zewinski, to 2023. To 76, Kyle Gibson. 223, Josh Naylor, and James Altman for the Dodgers, Rookie, Otto. Dodgers, that's Mark. To 4.99, Manny, Margot, and a relic, Mark Marguer. A's going to Devon Mookie. Cal Rueckin Jr. And then a Corbin Burns. City Connect. Bovards going to Sean Kelly. Lisa Reyes, Judge Michael Ayres, Laverita Stovers, Alaska's, Correa, Relander, Josh Trisson. All right, two more boxes, guys. Ken Griffey Jr. Eric Holder, 2.99, and a 2023, David. A photograph of Travis Swaggerty, and then Brian Bellow, numbered. Pirates, Tristan. Retzach's also Tristan. Marcella Suna. 2023, Cori Lee, and Begna Relic. Out of 50, Pink, Tailsgar Hernandez, and Eloy Hemines, City Connect Relic. A lost stock here. Bryson Stott, to a little Julio. All right, you guys, down to the final box. 99, Jaren Duran, Freddie Freeman, to 2023. Out of 2.99, Christian Vasquez, and our lost autograph is going to be Graham Ashcraft. Donnie Baseball, and Nolan Aronato. To 2023, CJ Cronin, and then welcome to the club, 3030. City Connect, Jazz Chisel, Mr. E. Blink, and Marcella Suna. All right, let's do the last two silver packs here, guys, and then we'll do that randomizer. DJ Hall, Randy Johnson, Tyler Freeman, and Blotty, Hoshkins, Bryce Harper, Ronald Acunia, and Juan Soto, and let me double check these out. I feel like we didn't get no numbered cards at all. I have them right here. This series is kind of hard to tell, but seems like we just kind of had a bad batch of silver packs, honestly. I don't see no numbered cards. Oh, no numbered cards, unfortunately, damn. All right then, guys. This was a little bit of a kind of case, honestly, but I mean, hey, it's series one, guys. So we got a top loader for that right now, but there was your hits right there from each box. Strikerity, Autograph, Omen Auto, Jeter Downs, Ricky Auto. We got a Tom Glavin, Sunny Gray. And we did have one of these to be randomized between these three teams here. So let's quickly do that. Let's get a dice roll, let's get a list. So then it's Twins, Yankees, Red Sox. One out of five, six times, good luck. One, two, three, four, five, six. Going to the Twins, Minnesota Twins with that one. That is David. All right, guys. Appreciate you guys. Jasmine'sKissRakes.com.


What's up, everyone? It's your girl, Kenzie here from Layton Sports Cards and I am Rippin. We've got six box F1 mixer of 2022 top scrum formula one hobby and light number 20 random teams. I'm going to give you a look at the random results here. Just one second. Oh, you can always find this at LaytonSportsCards.com under the results tab links also right in chat for you. All right, best of luck. Thanks again for filling this up. We're going to go ahead and get started. We're going to start with the light boxes here. Again, lights have 16 packs of box, 15 packs of box there for the wayraith parallels out of these. Here we go. Two of these F1 mixers then get into basketball. That'll ensure we've got purple checkered flag, Jack Duhump, also Anzo, and we've got short print, our two gram free of Monza. Nice. That is out of a light box too. Again, this does not have a team affiliation. So this will be a random to all at the end. Wow. Out of the second pack, we'll mag that and then do the random at the end. We've got wayraith Nicholas Latifi, refractor Alexander Albon, speed demon Sergio Perez, refractor of Lewis Hamilton, Williams racing refractor, Hamilton Norris signs, we've got Max Verstappen on the checkered flag. Nice one there, Red Bull, wayraith Daniel Ricardo, driver of the day, got Sebastian Vettel refractor, speed demons Alonzo, signs, Ferrari refractor, born you Hamilton, we've got a Botas on the refractor there for Alpha Romeo, and purple Yuki Sonoda, that is 31 to 399, Alpha Tauri, wayraith Joss Capito, Williams principal, Schumacher Magnuson refractor, Stroll refractor, Mercedes Verstappen, Cardo speed demons, we have Gunther Steiner refractor for Hots, Carlin refractor, wayraith Daniel Ricardo, last pack here, lightbox number one, and we've got a gold wave, formula winners of Oscar P. Ostry, there you go, Prima on the gold wave, 27 of 50, Prima that is going to be Hunchy, nice one there, nice way to end that box, lightbox number two here, and now let's get these mosaic basketballs filled up, last time I checked there were ten teams left in number 46, and those are four box breaks, teams are marked down even more than they were previously, let's get those filled up, it is coming up here soon, we've got a mini diamond Matia Benito for Ferrari, 38 of 2.99, and four box breaks, looking for the translucent case here, we've got purple and gold Lewis Hamilton, nice one there, Mercedes Alpine refractor, George Russell, stained glass in there, one auto per box, McShumacher refractor, McLaren refractor, stop in, we have eight Carlo signs on the driver of the day for turkey on the checkered flag, wayraith Nicholas Latifi for Williams, we've got purple George Russell, there you go Mercedes on the portrait, 30 of 3.99, got Lance Stroll refractor, Claire Speeddemons, red bull refractor, Hamilton, got refractor, future stars Liam Lawson, and green wayraith Fernando Alonzo for Alpine, 62 of 99, bronze tossed on the wayraith, we've got Schumacher and Magnussen, wayraith of Alexander Albon, we've got Daniel Ricardo refractor, A.R.T. Grand Prix refractor, Speeddemons refractor Yuki, got Lewis Hamilton Grand Prix winner, Alfa Romeo refractor, wayraith Daniel Ricardo, face, last pack of light box number two, Hamilton Russell, and green future stars of Roy Nassani for Dom's, that is 69 of 99, got light box number three, box number three, one second here, let's check on these basketball spots, first team nine to go now, down to nine, single digits for the first one, alright, here we go, light box number three, we've got Alfa Romeo, green way Fernando Alonzo for Alpine, 49 of 99, we've got orange and red of Yuki Sonoda, Alphatari, sharp looking card, Speeddemons, Nicholas Latifi, we have a Max for Stappin driver of the day, Red Bull, Vettel and Schroll refractor, A.R.T. Grand Prix, we've got Pink, Wayraith, Sebastian Vettel for Aston Martin, 36 of 75, Bonnu, refractor of Esteban O'Conn for Alpine, Russell Speeddemons, Sugarflag Latifi, William, Wayraith, Nicholas Latifi, I don't think I've ever pulled one of those Art Day Grand Prix out of a light box, that's probably like a super hard bull, these are usually just hobby short brands, Sergio Perez driver of the day, Purple Jack Doohon Future Stars Virtuos, C124 of 399, yeah, Pierre Gasly, Wayraith, got Aston Martin refractor, Alexander Albon, Wayraith, Nicholas Latifi refractor, Claren refractor, Speeddemons, Leclerc, Red Bull refractor, got Fernando Alonzo refractor, we're stopping in Perez, last pack of the light boxes, and then we'll get into the hobbies, Pierre Gasly, Wayraith, here we go, hobbies, again it says look for autograph cards on the bottom, and the hobbies have 18 packs of boxes, see some autos, we've got O'Conn, we've got another Art Day Grand Prix, Silverstone on this one, Great Britain, wow, that's crazy, again random to all, we will mag this one, two people taking home one of those, Alphat's Farrier refractor, got Orange and Red, Daniel Ricardo for McLaren, Yuki Speeddemons, thanks Barg, I hope you're having a good one as well, Alfa-Ramain, Joan Guan, you rookie refractor, Bolo Basi refractor, and Purple Richard for Shor for Trident, 49 of 399, two driver there, refractor Botos and Joan Guan, you refractor Gasly and Yuki, got Gold coming up, Yuki Sonota on your refractor, Gold Checkered Flag of Voltaire Botos for Alfa-Rameo, 44 out of 50, nice one there, Alfa-Rameo, get some more Gold, got refractor of Alpine, back up here, we have an auto, Marino Sato from Virtuoc on the F2 driver, thanks for subscribing, Barca, when I say Virtuoc, that is gonna be Rick E, there you go Rick, it's got some good luck on these F1 mixers, O'Conn, refractor McLaren, yeah, I like that one part there, sure, refractor Lando Norris, Grand Prix winner, got Checkered Flag, Oscar Piastri, and refractor Leclerc in Science, Hamilton, we've got Sergio Perez refractor, stopping, Magnuson, Red Bull refractor, Speed Demons, Hamilton, got Haas refractor, last pack of Hobby Box, number one, got refractor Marino Sato, and mini diamond of Roy Dessani for Dom, that is 177 of 299, solid first Hobby Box there, we had a short print, a gold and an auto, so cannot complain there, let's see, we got Hawk Celtics Max, Pacers Pelican Stunders, Sun's Kings Wizard, still nine to go in the first mosaic basketball break of the daytime, y'all, let's get this one filled up, again, all teams are discounted again, got one more F1, I'm next, and then we will be ripping the mosaic, here we go, Box 2, Future Stars, BOSHA, and purple Sergio Perez for Red Bull, 279 of 399, Alonzo O'Conn, refractor Lando Norris, ART Grand Prix refractor, Purple and Green, Botos driver, Grand Prix winner of Turkey, Speed Demons Leclerc, refractor Red Bull, got Joe Guanyu on the rookie refractor, and mini diamond of Kevin Magnuson for Haas, 207 of 299, Norris Ricardo, true gold here, mixed shoe marker, and it's a Red Bull, that's gonna be Sergio Perez, 48 of 50, congrats on that one, Red Bull, beautiful card there, Red Bull, that is going to Isaac K, beautiful hit, all right, second half here, Williams Racing refractor, Hamilton Speed Demons, refractor Prima Racing, refractor Bonito, checkered flag, Lando Norris driver of the day, refractor Hamilton and Russell, refractor Aston Martin, refractor Yuki, refractor McLaren, Leclerc refractor, all right, last box here, and then we'll do a recap in another auto, come on, refractor Norris and Ricardo, Lewis Hamilton, Grand Prix winner refractor, refractor Red Bull, ghastly, we've got mixed shoe marker on the gold and purple for Haas, Speed Demons stroll, snap in, got refractor Haas, we've got Lewis Hamilton, Grand Prix, mini diamond Sebastian Vettel for Aston Martin, 82 of 299, awesome Vettel, we've got Latifi and Albon, Marcus Armstrong refractor, we've got pink Sebastian Vettel, 15 of 75, Aston Martin, turning heat up here for you, Bobby, got Future Stars, Frederick Vesti and purple of George Russell for Mercedes, 242 of 399, we've got red, y'all, got a red, Alfa Romeo, red, four Mercedes, a Toto Wolf Auto, principle for Mercedes there, Brian N, that is three out of five, nice red, wow, congrats on that one, interesting auto there too, nice Toto, we'll mag that, Albon, great, great, red auto, some gold, two short prints, snap in, ART, Grand Prix, Max for snap in award winners, and we've got Pink Lewis Hamilton award winners, 61 of 75, Mercedes doing well this last box, we've got checkered flag, Max for snap in, and Alonzo O'Conn, we've got Ricardo, we've got Alpine refractor, couple pack left, oh boy, got Lando Norris last pack here, again I do have a random to run for those short prints, so give me just a minute to get that set up in Michael Ayer refractor, again I'm going to do them in the order that they were pulled, so we've got, this is going to be for the top team, the Manza, and then the second team is going to be the Silverstone, yeah, yeah that was sick, congrats on that one Brian, all right give me one second here, all right here's the random, again top two teams will take home one of the short prints, the top team will take home the first one we pulled which was the Manza, which is going to be the Italy short print, and then the second team is going to take home the Silverstone which is the Great Britain, that is the order in which they were pulled, so that's how we'll do that, throw our dice five times, again top two teams will take home one of the short prints, good luck everyone, one, two, three, four, five, so Ferrari and Haas, Ferrari is going to get the Manza, Ferrari and Haas is going to get the Silverstone, so Ferrari and Haas, top two teams, all right, let's do a recap here of some of our color, we had greens to 99, Fernando Alonso, Alpine, Fernando Alonso, Alpine, Roy Nassani, Dom, pink to 75, Sebastian Vettel, Aston Martin, Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes, Sebastian Vettel, Aston Martin, our golds, we had the sick red bull car here, Sergio Perez, gold checkered flag, Botos for Alfa Romeo, a Oscar Piotri for Prima, a refractor based auto of Marino Sato on the F2 driver, and then we had the red total whole firm Mercedes, that was three out of five, and then again the two short prints which we did the randoms for, the Manza which is going to Ferrari and Silverstone going to Haas, that will do it for the first one, thanks again everyone, we got another one coming up in a few minutes.