Hey everybody what's going on? I am Greg Sassman joined today by Jim Sannis of Fandle. He's going to take a final crack at week three. We're building some stacks to win us some money. What's going on Jim? I'm pretty excited Greg. This is a fun slate. We got two big games to stack out west and I think both are pretty intriguing so why deviate when we don't have to?  Well we really talked about it on Monday that the Russell Wilson Tyler Lockett stack is just like an autofill that you don't think about.  So let's do that part of the show before we move on. Let's write in Russell Wilson. We'll write in Tyler Lockett and then we'll get to everything else. So yeah here we are. Yeah kind of no brainer. Let's not over complicate things here Greg. And I think the one dilemma you could have is do you go Tyler Lockett or DK Metcalf. But I think a lot of people in that decision are probably going to go Metcalf. Metcalf has the lower salary on Fandle. He just obliterated Stefan freaking Gilmore on Sunday night football and national television so I would expect people to go into DK Metcalf and I can't blame them. DK Metcalf is a very good football player. So Metcalf straight up might be the better option. But I do think that Lockett is fun if we can get some leverage here off of the Russ and Metcalf stacks because Lockett has been good too. He has 27% of the team's targets through the first two games. He has 31% of the air yards and it's not like he's been bad. He just hasn't been as good as DK Metcalf. So I think Metcalf or Lockett is a really fun option here. He is $6,800. He is surrounded by some pretty fun wide receivers. Amari Cooper is there. Allen Robinson is there. Keenan Allen is there. So maybe that will draw away a bit from Tyler Lockett. I don't think he's going to be under the radar by any means. You're not going to get Tyler Lockett at like a 10% rostrate or anything like that. But he should be lower or less popular than Metcalf. And I think that's a good spot to jump off and get Tyler Lockett in your lineups. Big upside for him. Really good floor as well. And it's a game that I just want to stack every single way I can. It's interesting, right?  Everybody's going to be on that calf here this week. So let's make a little bit of a turn.  And with Russell Wilson throwing the ball and cooking, clearly, well, I think it's a stack you have to go with or have to consider going with here on Sunday. As Jim alluded to, the other West Coast late game that you got to make sure you're targeting here is Arizona and Detroit. Let's start on the Arizona side where Kyler Murray and Cliff Kingsbury and this Arizona offense is two and O and they haven't exactly faced the easiest of defenses, but now you're facing Detroit. It's going to be able to breathe a little bit more. You have Kyler Murray, you have Kenny and Drake, and this offense is ready to cook, if you will. Yeah. The good thing here is that Kenny and Drake makes it more affordable to stack Kyler Murray and Deandre Hopkins. So I think that you go with all three, honestly, you can very easily do so. But if you go with Kenny and Drake, who is $6,500, as you said, you're giving yourself flexibility to get to Hopkins. And honestly, Hopkins isn't that hard to get to to begin with. So you may not need that flexibility, but if you pair these three guys together, if this game blows up, you're probably going to be in a really good position in the odds this game blows up pretty freaking good based on the total for this one. Drake's role so far has been a little bit middling. He has lost some passing down work to chase Edmunds, but he's also faced two really tough defensive lines. And the Lions very much are not that. We saw Aaron Jones obliterate them last week. We saw Jones get a lot of production via the passing game as well. And Kenny and Drake in the past has shown that is within his arsenal. So he did run fewer routes last week than Chase Edmunds. I think that is a legitimate thing to note. I wouldn't say it's a concern yet. It is a thing to note for sure. But despite that, Drake has still gotten good volume. He now goes into a good matchup. He's paired with an offense that finally gets to face a defense. That's not one of the best defensive lines in all football. And I think they're in a good spot to erupt in week number three. So yes, you want to pair Kyler Murray with the Henry Hopkins, but if you go with Kenny and Drake as well, you're going to get like 150% of the yards from this team. If you combine Murray, Hopkins and Drake, and I think that's always pretty intriguing. You should get every touchdown to unless Edmunds gets one himself. So honestly, I think you just go all three. But I think that Kenny and Drake with that salary being as low as it is, makes it easy to jam in Hopkins. And that's something that I want to do pretty often on Sunday. Yeah, Drake and Hopkins combined with Kenny and Drake. Like you said, 150% of the offense and the yards are going to come with those three players with Arizona here finally facing a defense. They're going to be able to really dominate. And I've read a lot in season long that Kenny and Drake is a perfect buy low opportunity. I think that absolutely exists. And we're going to see that window close very, very soon because this Sunday against the Lions, I think Kenny and Drake is a really strong game. So I like this Arizona stack really just as much as I do Seattle. And now the stack that may not be nearly as fun, but maybe as productive is with the Detroit Lions. The other side of that Cardinals game where you have Matthew Stafford, not sure availability on Kenny Galladay yet, but Marvin Jones is the wide receiver that you're pairing with Matthew Stafford here. You have Stafford at $7300. You have Marvin Jones at $6100. Why is this a combination that you're looking at that's a little bit unique? I think it's because I'm operating in the assumption that Kenny Galladay will be back because Adam Schefter reported on Monday that Galladay would return, sounded like he was pretty close to playing last week. And I always feel better about having confidence in players when I know ahead of time that they're going to play. And it sounds like we had that with Galladay despite the limited practices on Wednesday and Thursday. I'm expecting pretty much a full go here. That's a good thing for this entire offense. Last year, the Detroit Lions played six games where Stafford and all three of their top receivers were fully healthy. And in those six games, Stafford was one of the most efficient quarterbacks in all of football. He threw deep about 26% of the time, which is just a massive number. We've seen them go back to that this year so far, but we have not seen the efficiency. But now you bring Kenny Galladay back into the fold. I would expect this offense to be much better and that benefits everyone, including Marvin Jones. You look back to last year when Galladay was healthy, playing alongside Jones and Matthew Stafford, we didn't see Jones get as much deep volume as Kenny Galladay, but he got a lot of work in the red zone. He had more than 30% of the red zone targets and Jones, despite not getting the deep work, was very effective. He actually had 100 or more yards in two of the six games they played with all three or all four of these guys being healthy. And in another game, he had 93 yards and four touchdowns. So Marvin Jones has upside when this offense is working well. I expect it to work better when Kenny Galladay is back, which I expect to happen on Sunday. So Jones is $6,100, hasn't done very much so far this year, but I expect this offense to get better with Kenny Galladay being back and that benefits Stafford. It benefits Marvin Jones. It benefits Galladay himself. So I would say just load up on the Lions, but I think this is a good time to get in on Marvin Jones because Kenny Galladay does make this entire offense that much better. I think the common thought or belief would be, hey, Kenny Galladay is back, Marvin Jones is going to take a back seat, but that's not necessarily true. Yes, he's not going to be the number one option in the offense anymore, but that's okay because you need the defense to look at somebody else. You need Patrick Peterson on the other side of the field opening up Marvin Jones to really do what he does best and be a volume type receiver for Matthew Stafford in this Darrell Vell will let offense. And I think Marvin Jones is sneaky, but smart in this match up here against Arizona. That's going to do it for us. That's week three. I'm ready to go, Jim. How about you? I just want to watch his afternoon games, Greg. Like I would like the one PM slate to be fine. It'll be fine, but I want to skip forward to the four PM slate and just watch those games. It's going to be a blast. I am hoping for some awesome island games on Sunday and Monday night too. So week, week three going to be a fun one. And I am looking forward to breaking it down with you on Monday. Week three is going to be awesome.  I can tell you when it comes to the Seahawks and the Cowboys, I'll have my, my Seahawks stack and then I'll just sit like this when Dak Prescott has the ball because Dak and the Zika Elliot, they may go nuts as well Sunday afternoon. For Jim Zana's, I am Greg Salsman. Have an awesome week. Good luck. Enjoy week three and Jim and I'll see you back here on Monday as we go over the biggest stories from this past weekend. Have a great weekend and we'll see you next time.


ۖ۫۫۰, ۔ۜۖ۴ ۖ Probleme from ۑۡ۰ husifakman ometimes ۉ Her words are so small that if you talk, the蛋's life will go so... ۰ Her words have got them so sometimes they make the蛋 complex ۚ All the people work hard ۥ כי ۖ۫۫۰олж争 ۷۶ audi ۱ ە ۷ дер� ۓ� probable life is also celebrated accordingly ۚ ۖBoth went into difficult times in ۖێ in life." ۭ ې October So, within 4 hours, if theQu 소리 stage happens, that it will take me about a 2 hours to find my own house for the song to the video to be mentioned at this time. At that moment, even the Amritsar Trillium Mall from Manjbook mam trainer and Trillium Mall offerings to ordinary people oriented towards healthy life on Kneeeee EE kangunjP tusnsing. ���ࠜ papier ��� జੀ ງ���ງ ൌเ໹໿ ཇো���༬༇ ൐�allzil yard ໐�rip �悈 ੆� ожид���로 జো������઼ ത� Mumbai ���는 St 보 pithi � abandon ಈ໽�alımຏ � associations � heft Lind ൅ོ� holder � destinations੆�新is ཇ� PA's How do you think about that… Now it is not fellowship of the job. We have given our customers away for complete expense. We thought, we should give them food or interest, so that we can go on working from now. In the teas 239 m, you work in the evening and day in your house… Do you think you won't get any time to stay home all day long… ఒాికిం unemployed . ఆటի ఆలూగోమినోల్ ఏలెటిలా కరాలోత్ల Argлаa过 . ఇసా醬 ఇటికే నియోగో రఇికాన్ మ్ట� Lightblade ఈపతుస్ఇ ఆఇర్ధలShould గపత Phew�ర్Fin తశప్నానిా� неёని ..  começo  igning  segreg orr Down your... ivel it's mixed… ivel... ival... औवाई थटी हैं के अगर शुकर ने ठी look water are rich people andflows but they think very well कनप्रम�菜 रह़्े कण्ताम फ quanँ च्यशक लगे तो ख मéfरनी अवदखार म्नक्नि �стрगा कुल कबने कि बोविऔज़ क्या तृट भागें टित के थूँप चमनऱसक की पहेदशक दल पहा aesthetic टहे आगHYingshailiansdis app . life ratsects of it are here for 12 hours. But there are very good things for them to do. We need time to maintain that same business. They have started duty security for them. What time are they leaving? I think it is about 10 or 15 or 16 months. And when they are there? I think they are following 11 o'clock. So it is like this,里كون are proposal date of 6 pm. अपने नितंन्यें भी ब суबा आद अपने नित्न नेनफोवें जत त्टेखा, वोमार गय दिन थ्पका आप shela, अ� инहीं आप फरूु ट्खान पर लग ळोप प्ैनिया तो और वों सामन क्य�रा scree वों सास्वओन करन्त तो रगे तक � Ribator  fixture auf अ देसका. आम्रि सर्ट्वन निटेश सबर्वाल मूझेटन पन्जाब.


Ms. Warner, are you the mother of the, we have received a word from Mr. Hoover that the investigation in the car indicates that there were no people in the car and it's very likely that none of them were burned as could have been possible under the early information and I talked to the governor there and he is making all the facilities of the state available in the search and they've seen some tracks leaving the car and they're going to try to continue. We were flying people in from the FBI tonight and I just wanted you to know that and that was a little hope that we didn't have earlier and I thought that we would enjoy it as long as we could. Thank you so much President Jones and I appreciate this. Thank you very much. Thank you ma'am. Thank you ma'am.


Good evening everyone and welcome. My name is Melissa Armo. I thought I would review Amazon here for you today, which was a gaffe up. It was a bullish golden gap It didn't broke out. It's interesting because in the training room this morning I looked at this and I thought Oh, this looks like it's gonna break out. I casually said it and that's exactly what it did and because I was doing my day trains Doing a short. I didn't do this and it was a huge tree And I went back and looked at this and I said, oh my lanta You know, sometimes everything sets up at the same time and and he just can't do everything But this would have been an option trade for me today, not an equity day trade So I get up in the morning every day and I look to day trade stocks. I prefer to short sometimes I go long Options I look at I look at and I don't do them every day. I really just do the good ones It just so happened today. This was a great one And it's set up at this as the same time as my day trades, but I love the fact it happened It was a great Great sign for the calendar year for the bullishness in the stock I'm gonna look at the daily chart and then I'm gonna do a little Option tutorial for people to understand how you can make money doing this and actually the earnings for this are January 26 So I'm gonna do something in this. I just do and I just haven't figured out what yet So it's a it's a wait and see But the stock gapped up if you had rated the gap for the 26 golden gap rating system that I teach in my golden gap class You would have known you could have gone long the stock today dream target was a 15 and look at that It got within 77 cents of the dream target on a day that the market really was not amazingly bullish So this gapped up of its own accord the reason doesn't matter it opened at 831 and it went Now I'm gonna go over what I would have done today Which again, I did not because I day treated and I shorted HES which worked I made money, but this set up the exact time as the short So I did not get this but the funny thing is I taped the room today and go back to listen to it I watched in the morning said oh this looks like it's gonna break out But I didn't know if it would do it exactly today But if I'd watched this interview open it would have known it cuz it gapped up and it did it and the price point of The strike I would have done if I had done it It's too late now, but if I had would have been 800 now. I'm gonna go over Examples and I'm gonna do three examples one is for beginner One is for intermediate and this is for options and one is for advanced and it depends on the amount of money You want to risk this is a lesson for everyone to you know Listen to what I'm saying Understand options if you don't understand them and I and I do options in a very very simple way I'm either buying a calm and selling it or I'm Buying a putt and selling it. That's what I do and it's based on my golden gap 26 point rating system So let's look you could have bought Amazon today and again. I went back to this and I was like, uh You know you could have bought this today at approximately 430 as a cost one contract would have cost you what? 430 dollars This is beginner that it means a hundred shares. I'm just trying to break it down to understand price is 430 one contract and The exit at the target of the chart of the daily chart Was 1410 not the dream target normal target? Okay? Which is you know how I usually trade So that would be a profit of nine point eight on One contract that meant you would have made nine hundred eight dollars You would have made almost a thousand bucks today on this if you had done it So with a four hundred thirty dollar risk, you could have made nine hundred eighty dollars, which is what it's 227% return on investment in one trade in one day now. Why how can you make that much return investment? It's because of the gap. Let's go back closed seven ninety nine oh two Open eight hundred thirty one set the stock gapped up. It was a bullish gap And you could have rated it if you knew my system and that's how you would have known to do the option Okay So that's why it worked. That's why it went almost to the dream target actually Example number two intermediate four point three oh same cost ten contracts would have been what four thousand three hundred dollars, okay? That equates to a thousand shares in the actual equity, but you're doing again the option You have you don't have a stop in an option, but whatever your risk is what your risk This would have been an eight hundred dollar strike that expired on Friday January 13th, but you would have gotten in it today and out of it today You would have got in in the morning into the open and you would have exited it between a Probably run two o'clock two o'clock was going to hit the target So as the price at the target 14 10 again How do you calculate the price and the profits and options you take the cost of the position? Which is 4.3 times the number of contracts minus the sale price equals what 9.8? Again simple arithmetic, but the bottom line is would have been almost a grand $9,800 I look at this and I was like I should have done this today other than the HES I did make money on HES today is very very happy it opened it swushed, but this was huge huge I would have had to do one long and one short at the same time one option one day trade at the same time You know, I'm working on that I'm working on trying to do do all of that at the same time But I will tell you that running a live training room when things set up quickly and amending them out by myself You know, there's there's a lot to look at and so I was able to do it this morning make money I'm able to do it many days But this this was a second trade today, and I and I and before the open I said, oh, this looks like it's gonna break out and And and it did it just set up the same time as HES So sometimes you have to you have to pick which one you're gonna do If we're day trades, I prefer to short, but I will tell you you can make money day trading options I mean this is proof positive What I love about this and the money that could have been made in this today is that it is a confirmation That the stock itself is higher and that the market is bullish this year that stocks like Amazon will live through And and pull the market up which is already doing into the close tonight and and I'm gonna do something in this trust me I don't know what but something so let's just look at this here So with a $4,300 risk you could have made 9,800 bucks again same trade is it success free of more size, but you make more money It's still a 227% return investment in one trade in one day And why again because of the gap again everything I do is because of the gap it the amount of money you risk is dependent on you But the percentage of return on investment has to do with the gap I actually think and I and I don't do this because I love to day trade I love to day trade. I love to short stocks But I know now after doing options using my golden gap 26 point rating system that you could use my system with the rating system and train options and Make enough money in a calendar year to support yourself doing options and nothing else no day trades Of course, he'll make more money if you do both But you could you could absolutely make a living only doing options trades when you get the gap that rates 20 points or more Which this did? Whether you'd go long or short You don't have to be at your desk between 9 30 and 10 a.m. Which is the benefit of options But you got to manage your trades you got to watch them I mean you definitely have to watch them and And and and you got to watch them and you have to look at the time value and let's go back in this case You would have been in at the same day Example three is advanced Advanced meaning more risk larger share size. I've taken up to 50 Contracts or more and some of the trades I did in options in 2016 I'm working up to larger sizes in here into 2017 It's just the start of earnings season and that's that's also why I probably am just focusing on day trading now until until we really get the earnings Now 4.30 was the cost a matter what? 20 contracts, which would have been what $8,600 which is 2,000 shares of the underlying security Exit at the price target again same Target on the daily chart 1410 although it went higher But it hits the target you get out. You don't take every trade only to the dream target Anyways, how do you calculate the profits saved 4.3? 2000 shares 20 contracts minus the sale price 1410 equals what profit of 9.80? Profit on 20 contracts is what you could have made $19,600 if you had 20 contracts of this today You would have needed to put up $2,600 on the live day from the entry into Approximately Vangston, which was around 2 o'clock Eastern time You would have needed to be in that trade and out of that trade But that's the money you would have needed in your account to put up to make this amount But that is a 227% return in investment in one trade and one day Where are you going to make that kind of money? It is very rare that you make that kind of money to any job that you have it is even rare that you make The kind of money in a day trade or an option trade or anything the reason that this works so huge and many of the day trades whether they're options or day trades that I've done in 2016 have worked with such huge huge either risk to reward if it's a day trade Return of investment if it's an option is because of the fact that it is based on the quality of the gap I have a 26 point rating system. I rate it if it's 20 points or more I know to do it whether it's long or short and that is what you learn in the class with me The class is this weekend January 14th and 15th if you would like more information you can email me at melissa at the stocks wish comm Options are an extremely profitable way to trade and if you are looking to Build an account to get to the point where you can actively day trade, you know options is one one way to do it It's just one way to do it to get to the point where you've got the money necessary to actively day trade But if you want my honest opinion, I think you should do both because some days you get good options Some days you get good day trades some days you get both some days you get long some days you get shorts They both work depending on the quality of the gap and you never know until you get up in the morning And you see the gap and you rate the gap So for more information email me at melissa at the stocks wish comm have a great day everyone


Link in the description box. All right guys, welcome back to the channel. If you're new Manus Bobby guys, you've been asking me over and over again since I started doing reaction videos to finally react to the Quran and the secrets of Egypt by many prophets, one message. The video is over half an hour long, so this will be my longest reaction video yet. With no further ado, let's have a look. Egypt, land of the pyramids and pharaohs. One of the most studied and scrutinized civilizations of the ancient world. And yet it remains failed in mystery. In this video, we're going to see that the Quran reveals secrets about Egypt that until recently were lost to mankind. Pharaoh was a tyrant in Egypt, enslaving and persecuting the children of Israel. The Quran states the following about the death of Pharaoh and his supporters. Note the words heaven and earth wept not for them. A recently unearthed pyramid text has granted us new insights into the meaning of this verse. The pyramid text reads, the sky weeps for you, the earth weeps for you, when you ascend to heaven as a star. Here the pyramid text praises Pharaoh, claiming that upon his death he will ascend through the sky and claim supremacy of the heavens by becoming a star. We can see that the Quran quotes the pyramid text directly in its rebuttal of Egyptian adulation of Pharaoh. What's amazing is that knowledge of the ancient Egyptian language of hieroglyphics was lost to mankind at the time the Quran was revealed. It wasn't until the discovery of an artifact known as the Rosetta Stone in the 18th century over a thousand years after the revelation of the Quran that mankind has been able to fully decode the hieroglyphics. When you hear the word Pharaoh, what comes into your mind? Most people think of the supreme ruler of Egypt. This is correct, but the word did not always refer to the supreme ruler. Ancient Egyptian history is divided into different periods. The word Pharaoh, Egyptian pera, had different meanings depending on the period of Egyptian history. Historically, the word Pharaoh only started being used as a title for the supreme ruler much later in Egyptian history during the New Kingdom period. Before this, the word meant great house and was used to refer to the royal palace. The Encyclopedia Britannica states, Pharaoh, originally the royal palace in ancient Egypt, the word came to be used for the Egyptian king under the New Kingdom. Encyclopedia Britannica is a reputable source. Let's now analyze the Quran's accounts about Egypt in light of these historical facts. Like the Bible, the Quran discusses the prophets Joseph and Moses who both spent time in Egypt. Joseph is dated by scholars to either the middle kingdom or second intermediate period, well before Pharaoh meant ruler. In the story of Joseph, the Quran repeatedly uses the word king to refer to the ruler of Egypt. He is never once called Pharaoh. Moses is dated by scholars to the New Kingdom period. In the story of Moses, the Quran repeatedly calls the ruler Pharaoh. He is never called king. We can see that the Quran is accurate in its use of language when it comes to describing the leader of Egypt at different periods in its history. How could the author of the Quran have known this? The only source of information about ancient Egypt that would have been readily available are the Bible based stories. To claim that the Quran copied from the Bible is problematic because the Bible uses the word Pharaoh to refer to the Egyptian ruler in the story of Joseph, which is historically inaccurate. The Quran cannot have copied from the Bible. I heard this argument before that the Quran copied the Bible. However, if the Quran copied the Bible, it would copy the mistakes, the historical mistakes found within the Bible as well. And apparently that didn't happen. The Quran corrects the Bible. The Bible explicitly states that at the time of the Exodus, the Israelites men were vast in number. The Israelites journeyed from Ramesses to Sukkoth. There were about 600,000 men on foot besides women and children. If we factor in the women and children, then the total number of Israelites would realistically be in the millions. This claim of a vast nation is problematic in light of other information that the Bible provides. Firstly, Pharaoh is said to have appointed two midwives to deliver and murder Israelite babies. The king of Egypt said to the Hebrew midwives whose names were Shippurah and Pua when you are helping the Hebrew women during childbirth on the delivery stool if you see that the baby is a boy, kill him. Brutally. Two midwives would only be sufficient for such a task if the Israelites were small in number and giving birth to a manageable number of babies. Two midwives would not be sufficient for a vast nation of millions. Secondly, the Bible tells us that after the Exodus, God informed Israel that they would not be granted the land of their enemies straight away. But I will not drive them out in a single year because the land would become desolate and the wild animals too numerous for you. Little by little, I will drive them out before you until you have increased enough to take possession of the land. Note the reason for the Israelites being denied immediate possession of the land. It is said that wild animals will overpower them. Such a statement only makes sense if the Israelites were small in number and not a vast nation of millions as the Bible claims. By contrast, the Quran states that the Israelites were only a small band at the time of Moses. We can see that the Quran fixes the contradictions that are present in the Bible. Man, this is really fascinating. When I was reading the Quran, those details didn't really struck me. I was much more impressed as I said prior with the Tauheed with the monotheism found in the Quran. But now the way that it's explained here in this video, I start to see the correction of the historical mistakes within the Bible. And this makes the Quran even more impressive. The Quran states that the punishment of crucifixion was used in ancient Egypt from the time of Moses all the way back to the time of Joseph. Now the word crucifixion typically brings to mind the Roman cross. However, in antiquity, there were different forms of crucifixion. Professor of archaeology David Chapman wrote, In studying the ancient world, the scholar is wise not to differentiate too rigidly the categories of crucifixion, impalement and suspension. Hence, any study of crucifixion conceptions in antiquity must grapple with the broader context of the wide variety of penal suspension of human beings. The Arabic words translated as crucify in the Quranic verses all contain the root word. Arabic dictionaries state that this root carries a number of meanings including to harden or stiffen and to extract oily matter from bones. This word does not only mean death by being hung on a Roman cross. Rather, it indicates any method of execution which makes the body hardened or stiffened and results in the leaking of bodily fluids. So, impalement, suspension and the Roman cross are all included without making any distinction. Archaeological evidence shows that the ancient Egyptians used to crucify people by impalement on a stake. The following entry is taken from an Egyptian German dictionary of hieroglyphics. Note the hieroglyph which depicts an impaled man. This is a punishment that was used throughout the different periods of ancient Egypt. The Abbot papyrus is dated to the New Kingdom period. It mentions an oath that includes impalement. He took an oath on pain of being beaten and of being impaled. The earliest evidence for crucifixion by impalement is papyrus bulak 18 which is dated to the early second intermediate period. It states, a bloodbath had occurred with wood. The comrade was put on the stake. We can see that crucifixion by impalement on a stake was carried out during the New Kingdom period and at least as far back as the second intermediate period. These time periods cover both Moses and Joseph which shows that the Quran is historically accurate. As well as mentioning crucifixion, the Quran also narrates the following threat of mutilation made by the Pharaoh of Moses. It's so funny that they took this old wide guy for the role of the Pharaoh in those old movies. Historically we know that capital punishment in ancient Egypt became more severe with the advent of the New Kingdom period which is the time of Moses. In fact the specific punishment of mutilation is primarily associated with the New Kingdom period. For example the Turin judicial papyrus records persons to whom was done punishment by severing their nose and ears on account of them ignoring the good instruction said to them. When I was a child I don't know which country it was man I'm trying to remember. I think it was in the Czech Republic and our school brought us into a torture museum where they showed us all of the weaponry that was used to torture people. It's a really perverted art of creativity. A crucifixion and mutilation are missing in the Bible. There is a Jewish commentary the Midrash Shemot Rabah which mentions Pharaoh threatening Moses with burning and crucifixion. But this is a much later work that was composed centuries after the Quran was revealed. Neither the Bible nor Quran identifies the Pharaoh of Moses by name. We can use the details provided in the scriptures to try to identify the Pharaoh. Both scriptures speak of the Israelites being taken into slavery before the birth of Moses. The use of Samites for slave labour occurred only during the New Kingdom period. So we can place Moses somewhere in the New Kingdom period. This gives us a list of 33 possible Pharaohs. Both scriptures also speak of an exodus of the Israelites out of Egypt. The Maneptestele is an important artifact that contains the first explicit reference to Israel in the archaeological record. It is dated to around 1208 BCE. It discusses the land of Canaan and mentions the Israelites in relation to Canaan indicating that the exodus had already taken place by this date. The artifact is contemporaneous to the Pharaoh Maneptestele. This means that the exodus had to take place before Maneptestele since Maneptestele was alive and in power after the exodus and not drowned in the sea. This establishes an upper boundary in the timeline of the Pharaohs. From the point of view of both the Bible and Quran we are now left with 18 Pharaohs as candidates who may have ruled during the time of Moses. Let's now delve deeper into the biblical narrative. The Bible claims that there were two different Pharaohs who were in power. The first died while Moses was in hiding in Midian. When Pharaoh heard of this he tried to kill Moses but Moses fled from Pharaoh and went to live in Midian. During that long period the king of Egypt died. The new Pharaoh continued his predecessors' persecution of the Israelites and it was the second Pharaoh who was later drowned when Moses crossed the sea. The Bible gives us a timeline for these events.  So from his birth to the exodus there was a span of at least 80 years during which two Pharaohs ruled Egypt. Now there is a big problem if we compare this biblical narrative to the timeline of the Pharaohs. We've seen that the Bible claims exactly two Pharaohs ruled during the 80 year period from the birth of Moses to the exodus. 80 years the very least right but it could be a little bit more than 80 years as well. We have to keep that in mind this maybe 100 years. If we consider the number of years that each of the Pharaohs ruled we can see that there is no 80 year period during which only two Pharaohs ruled. Okay good. Any given 80 year period will give you at least three Pharaohs in power. Right on. We can see that the biblical narrative contradicts the historical evidence. Let's now compare the Quranic narrative. Unlike the Bible the Quran depicts a single Pharaoh reigning from the birth of Moses all the way up to the exodus. The Quran informs us that Moses fled to Midian when he reached the age of maturity. The Quran defines the age of maturity as 40 years old. The Quran also informs us I didn't know that I thought that the age of maturity is when you hit puberty. During his time in Midian Moses spent eight to ten years in the service of his father-in-law before returning to Egypt to face Pharaoh. This means that Moses was a real good investigative work here man was at least 48 years of age when the exodus happened. Okay the only Pharaoh during the New Kingdom period who had such a lengthy reign as an absolute ruler was Ramesses II who ruled for 66 years. The Quranic account is perfectly in line with the historical evidence and fixes the chronological issues that are present in the biblical narrative. Very impressive very convincing as well I have to say. Let's now compare the life and religion of Ramesses II to the claims that the Quran makes about the Pharaoh of Moses. This claim that the Pharaoh of Moses was extravagant has been proven by archaeological discoveries which show that Ramesses II was the grandest of the pharaohs. The archaeologist Peter Clayton wrote his genuine building achievements are on a Heculian scale. The archaeologist Eric Uphill wrote the palace of Ramesses was probably the vastest and most costly royal residence ever erected by the hand of man. The Egyptologist Kenneth Kitchen wrote certainly in his building works for the gods Ramesses II surpassed not only the 18th dynasty but every other period in Egyptian history. With regards to the religion of the Pharaoh of Moses the Quran makes the following claim. Many of those depictions here are used to prove UFOs. The Quran states that the Pharaoh of Moses was arrogant exalting himself to the position of God. Modern archaeological discoveries have proven this to be true. Ramesses II built the great temple at Abu Simbel to honor himself. Its entrance is flanked by four colossal statues of Ramesses II which dwarf the statue of Ra-Horakhti god of the horizon located above it. This temple also contains an image of Ramesses II making a sacrifice to his divine self. The Quran makes the following claim about the Pharaoh of Moses who got drowned in the sea. We can see that the Quran explicitly states that the Pharaoh's body will be preserved as a sign for future generations. Note that the Quran never makes such a statement about any of the other destroyed nations that it discusses. Typically stating that their abandoned buildings and ruins have been made signs for later generations. This claim about a body being preserved is unique to the Pharaoh of Moses. The body of Ramesses II was discovered by archaeologists in the year 1881 CE. The mummy has been on display in the Cairo Museum and over the last century it has been seen by millions of tourists from all over the world. In the following documentary Sir Tony Robinson states that Ramesses II is one of the few pharaohs whose body has survived largely intact. Just across the river from Luxor lies the famous Valley of the Kings where Ramesses himself was buried. His mummy was discovered in 1881. One of the few pharaohs whose body has survived largely intact. Historically priests had concealed his body in a secret location in the year 1000 BCE because of a problem with grave robbers. Nothing was known about his mummy in the intervening period of almost 3000 years. At the time the Quran was revealed the whereabouts and fate of Pharaoh's body was unknown. During the 3000 year period in which the body was hidden it could easily have been damaged or stolen. It may have even remained lost forever locked away in its secret location never to be rediscovered. If you think about it these statements in the Quran are not only historically accurate but also represent quite a bold prophecy. Again guys I know that I'm very very quiet this time watching this video. Usually it's very hard for me to stay quiet however this video is very long so I want as little interruptions as possible and on top of that this information is new to me so I'm really sitting back here and learn. The bible informs us about a series of plagues that God brought upon Egypt. The book of Exodus informs us that the first six of these plagues are as follows. First the Nile was turned into blood. Second masses of frogs. Third swarms of mosquitoes. Fourth swarms of flies. Fifth the death of livestock. Sixth boils on people and animals. Now at first sounds kind of like the times that we're living in right now to be honest. We just saw a livestock dropping dead and more over right now we are in monkeypox season so you could definitely see that as skin boils. This series of plagues in the biblical narrative may seem random and unrelated however the Quran sheds light on these events. The Quran states the following about the divine punishments against Egypt. Notice the first punishment mentioned by the Quran a flood. This is an important detail that is not found in the bible. This punishment of a flood actually explains the six seemingly random and unrelated plagues in the biblical narrative. A flood would result in high concentrations of red earth entering the Nile river and causing a blood-like colour killing fish and making the water undrinkable as described in the biblical narrative. This phenomenon is attested to historically as recorded by a middle kingdom Egyptian sage. See the river is blood one shrinks from other people and thirsts for water. The rest of the biblical plagues are also easily explained as a consequence of the flood. Frogs mentioned in plague number two are known to fill the land after Nile floods. The death of the frogs recorded in the biblical narrative can be caused by contamination of anthrax that was carried over from the rotting fish. Mosquitoes mentioned in plague number three proliferate after Nile floods as the pools of water left over from the flooding would have allowed them to overbreed. Swarms of flies mentioned in plague number four will be brought about by the massive death of frogs on the land. The death of pasturing livestock mentioned in plague number five can be explained by anthrax as brought on the land by the frogs. The boils on humans and cattle mentioned in plague number six may have been caused by bites. The stablefly in particular is infamous for its vicious biting of mammals. We can see that the Quran's mention of a flood easily explains the biblical plagues which are not random as initially appears to be the case but in fact a series of interrelated events. The Quran mentions the following incident about Joseph while he was in Egypt. Here the Quran states that Joseph was sold for a poultry price. The Arabic phrase used is which contains the words dirham and ma'adud. Dirham means a unit of silver coinage or weight. Ma'adud means countable or limited in number. So the Quran is making the claim that Joseph was sold for a small amount of countable silver. There is plenty of historical evidence that standardized units of silver were used in transactions in ancient Egypt. Small pieces of silver known as shatih were used in trade. The tomb of the Anknum and Khnumhotep is dated to the old kingdom period. It contains a scene of a busy open-air market with goods for sale. Cubits of cloth for example are said to be sold for six shatih. The rind mathematical papyrus is dated to the second intermediate period. It discusses the relative values of gold, silver and lead in terms of shatih. Small silver bars bearing the name of Pharaoh Tutankhamun have been dated to the new kingdom period. They are inscribed with the hieroglyphic which states Tutankhamun ruler of Heliopolis in Upper Egypt. Until recently historians believed that the minting of precious metals was a later Greek invention. These recent Egyptian archaeological discoveries have forced historians to completely revise their understanding of coinage in the ancient world. How is it possible that such knowledge was revealed in the Quran nearly one and a half thousand years ago? The Bible mentions that Joseph was sold for 20 of silver. However this sale is said to have taken place with some Arabs outside Egypt. By contrast the Quran states that the sale took place inside Egypt. So the Bible could not have been used as a source by the Quran. It is in fact the Bible that contains historical errors when it comes to coinage. For example the Bible makes the claim that a gold coin known as the Darik was used at the time of King David. They gave toward the work on the temple of God 5,000 talents and 10,000 Dariks of gold. As historians point out the Darik is named after the Persian leader Darius the Great who lived hundreds of years after King David. The Jewish encyclopedia acknowledges this error lived hundreds of years after King David. The Jewish encyclopedia acknowledges this error. A notable instance of anachronism occurs in First Chronicles 297. Gold Dariks coins which were not struck before the time of King Darius the First i.e. more than 400 years after David. The Quran narrates the following conversation between the Pharaoh of Moses and an individual referred to as Haman. Here Pharaoh commanded Haman to build a tower that would allow him to reach the heavens. It's important to understand that Pharaoh's intention was not to literally scale a tower to reach the sky. Rather it's a reference to the Egyptian belief that after death the Pharaoh would ascend from earth to heaven taking his place among the gods. As we covered earlier the author of the Quran had an awareness of ancient pyramid texts that detailed such beliefs. Egyptian monuments housed the bodies of dead pharaohs. These monuments acted as a bridge between this world and the next. They were filled with religious writings that served as instructions to help the dead pharaoh ascend to the heavens. Hence. Absolutely what I know about the Egyptians is that they lived every day in the pursuit of death. They consistently reflected upon death and they were getting ready to enter into the other realm. The person in charge of constructing is quite amazing actually because if you think about it how people live their lives nowadays they believe they're going to live forever and they're just living in the moment without ever thinking about death. It's in direct contrast to this day and age. Pharaoh would not only need to be skilled in architecture but also highly knowledgeable in religion. They build a priest of sorts. Let's now turn to history to see if we can identify an individual known as Haaman who was both a builder and a priest. Earlier we concluded that Ramesses II was the pharaoh at the time of Moses so we will focus on this time period. A block statue in the Egyptian Museum of Munich contains a biographical account of the life of a high priest named Bakken Honsu. In his own words he states, I am one truly reliable, useful to his lord, who performs beneficent deeds within his temple. I being principal chief of works in the estate of Amun. I erected obelisks of granite stone whose tops reach to the sky. Here Bakken Honsu tells us that he served the pharaoh in two ways. First by performing rituals in the temple and second as chief architect. In fact Bakken Honsu was an architect extraordinaire, being one of the greatest in all of ancient Egypt. He is responsible for constructing the temple of Amun at Karnak, a monument that remains one of the largest religious structures ever created by man. With regards to the priesthood Bakken Honsu informs us that he had a very long and illustrious career. I was a third prophet of Amun for 15 years. I was a second prophet of Amun for 12 years. He appointed me high priest of Amun for 27 years. Here Bakken Honsu is stating that he served the god Amun throughout his priestly career. Amun is the name of an Egyptian deity who rose to prominence during the New Kingdom period. By the time Bakken Honsu died he had been a priest for many decades having served Ramesses II as high priest throughout his reign. Both Ramesses II and Bakken Honsu were contemporaries who died around the same time. What about the Quran's mention of Haaman? How does it relate to Bakken Honsu? Bakken Honsu referred to himself by the title High Priest of Amun. The actual phrase in the hieroglyphics is Haam Natah Tapii Amana. The word Haam literally means servant and Amana is how you articulate the name of the god Amun in Egyptian. Bakken Honsu was Haam Amana meaning servant of Amun. The Quran's mention of Haaman may be simply an Arabized version of the Egyptian Haam Amana. Let's now summarize the main points about Bakken Honsu. He was a senior ranking figure under Pharaoh Ramesses II acting as both High Priest and Chief Architect. He served in the temple of the god Amun and thus had the title Haam Amana. It is clear that all of the historical evidence fits perfectly with the Quranic narrative. Now it's important to point out that the Bible also mentions a Haaman but the resemblance is only in name. The biblical Haaman served under a Persian king and bears no relation to the Quranic Haaman of Egypt. Yet again these are details that are completely missing in the biblical narrative. Would be interesting to hear the story who the biblical Haaman is because I really do not know. If anybody knows let me know in the comments. In this video we have seen that the Quran has a remarkable insight into many facets of ancient Egypt. Revealing long lost knowledge while also correcting the Bible. Claims that the author of the Quran copied from the Bible are clearly rubbish in light of such facts. The Quran boldly declares its origins. To learn more about the miracles of the Quran please download your free copy of the book The Eternal Challenge at the link below. All right and this is it for today's video the longest reaction video yet. I have to say that I learned a lot roughly 99% of this information was new to me. This is why I had to sit back and listen myself. When I do reaction videos I do them for myself as well. When I started doing those reactions I told you guys I will watch those videos in my spare time either way but if you enjoy them then we can watch them together and I can give you my honest reaction. So yet again this is my honest reaction this time I really couldn't say much to this newly presented information. I would have to look it up for example who the biblical Haaman is. But taking the information at face value I have to say that I'm even more impressed with the Quran now. When I read the Quran by myself I kind of brushed over those details. It wasn't of particular interest to me. I mentioned this prior as well. Historical information is not so interesting to me. For me the timeless information in the Quran the unity of God the monotheism this is what really struck my interest and this is why I kind of brushed over the Egyptian parts. However now looking at it from this lens I have to say that this qualifies the Quran even more as revelation especially because the Quran apparently corrects the mistakes within the Bible. And that on its own speaks volumes because it confirms the mission of the Quran so to speak. The clarifying mission of the Quran to set everything straight and to show us the red thread. To show us that all the prophets have been monotheists and the message has always been the same. And on top of that to clarify those historical mistakes. Very very impressive video. Thank you very much for the recommendation guys. Guys let me know in the comment section as well which video I should react to next. All right but this is it for today. If you liked the video leave the thumbs up. If you haven't subscribed already guys please do so. And if you want to support me on Patreon all the links are in the description box below. Thank you so much for your ongoing support. All right guys this is it. Hopefully next video I will talk a little bit more yet again. As always may God bless you all. Much love and peace.


Welcome to World's Best Videos, we've compiled a list of facts about social media sensation Hannah Stocking, let's get into it. Hannah Jo Stocking was born on February 4, 1992 in Ashland, Oregon. She is currently 25 years old and resides in Hollywood, California. Her parents' names are Holly and John Stocking. She has an older sister named Ruby. She attended Ashland High School where she would graduate and continue her studies at the Dominican University of California. While attending college she played volleyball. She graduated with a degree in both biology and chemistry. She mentions in an interview that she looks up to Jennifer Aniston. She first started her rise to fame on the 6 second looping app Vine. She posted her first Vine video on August 1, 2013. It was called How Girls React to Guys vs How Guys React to Girls and featured Daystorm Power and Clarity. Per Vine ended she had almost a million followers but was 5,000 short. She also amassed over 138 million loops across her 35 posts, which is amazing because that's an average of 4 million loops per Vine. She had been in relationships with basketball players Kyrie Irving and Clay Thompson. Since Vine she has still been producing funny entertaining content to the internet throughout her social media platforms. She is a social media phenomenon amassing over 1.6 million followers to her verified self titled Facebook page. Her Instagram account is creeping up on 7 million followers currently having over 6.9 million followers while following 396 people. Her Twitter has 153,000 followers and she follows almost 3,000 people. Her YouTube account has over 933,000 subscribers and over 61 million total upload views. Her most popular video is a video she released on December 8th, 2016 and it's called Catching a Cheater. It currently has over 5.7 million views and almost 100,000 likes. Well that concludes the video guys hopefully you guys did enjoy the video and if you did remember to smack that like button let us know in the comment section below what you would like to see next and if you haven't already subscribed please do subscribe to keep up with the world's best videos.


Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to this joint session of the Empire Club of Canada and the Canadian Club of Toronto. On behalf of Gordon Real and myself, we want to extend a very warm welcome to all of you, and of course a very special welcome to our visitors who are here for the Economic Summit. I apologize for the long wait, but I'm sure you wouldn't have wanted an incident, and we have a very distinguished head table, and I don't know whether I'm going to have time to introduce them all, so I'm going to go at a very fast clip here, and you'll have to bear with me. On my extreme left, Mrs. Joyce Kaufman, Mr. Harry H. Wilson, Mr. Wilson, his attractive daughter-in-law, Margie, Mrs. Wilson. From Washington, we're thrilled to have the Ambassador Niles, his Excellency Ambassador Niles, and Mrs. Schultz also from Washington, Mrs. Schultz. His Excellency Ambassador Gottlieb, Ambassador Niles. The Honorable Michael Wilson, Secretary James A. Baker III, Secretary of the Treasury, Mr. Gordon Real, the President of the Canadian Club of Toronto, Mr. Real. On my extreme right, Mr. Harry Seymour, past President of the Emperor Club, Sonia Sinclair, immediate past President of the Canadian Club. And I'm Reagan, the Prime Minister of Canada, and Mrs. Mulroney, and the President of the United States of America, and Mrs. Reagan. Would Mr. Allen Monk please come forward? Yes, there he is. Will you join me in a toast to Her Majesty the Queen of Canada? Ladies and gentlemen, will you join me in a toast to the President of the United States of America and to his lovely and glamorous First Lady? Please be seated. Ladies and gentlemen, Mr. President, Mrs. Reagan, Mr. Prime Minister, Mrs. Mulroney, your Excellencies, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen. June 1988 is certainly going to go down in history as one of the busiest and most productive months in the lives of the four distinguished guests seated immediately on my left and on my right. We have a great deal to be proud of in our country. We are well aware and thankful for the tremendous economic growth in Canada, the impressive employment creation, the Meach Lake Accord, tax reform, and the free trade discussions to mention just a few of the items that are occupying the time of the Prime Minister and our other politicians. Regardless of one's political persuasion, one has to be impressed with the pace of activity surrounding the first four years of Mr. Mulroney's tenure. The agenda is a personal occasion for me, it's an opportunity for me to welcome him to our country. As you know there's something in here that limits the lease on White House. That brought to mind an incident that actually occurred to me about a year and a half ago. I was sitting at the, the President has done more to stay at the State of the Course. He has changed the course of America and world history. On a personal note, I've always found Ronald Reagan engaging and engaged. Good humor and generous. I should tell you that the first time that I ever had the chance to meet with the old office I would be in the opposition. May that never happen again. Ryder's ancestors put it another way. May the road rise up to meet you. May the wind always be at your back. May the rain fall soft upon your fields and may the sunshine warm upon your face. And until we meet again, may the Lord hold you in the palm of his hand. Ladies and gentlemen, we've received tonight, speaks more eloquently than my words. But on behalf of our two clubs, thanks and to you, Mrs. Reagan, with this gift from our two clubs, it is a carving by one of our foremost inward artists, Keo Waka Shunan, of Kate Jordan.


shortest path problem now before we go into an algorithm to solve the shortest path problem we will introduce something called a weighted graph now we have already seen that a graph is an ordered pair of sets so I write G as a graph which is equal to V, E where V is the set of vertices and E is the set of edges now we know what are vertices and edges now when we have a weighted graph then each edge has a weight and in our discussion we will take the edge the weights to be greater than 0 so strictly speaking we consider a function from E to positive real numbers so we consider functions from E the set of edges to R plus where R plus is the set of positive real numbers and these this function is called the weight function and individual values of this weight function will be called the weights of edges for example suppose we have an edge E1 belonging to E we can operate the weight function on this edge E1 and we will get WE1 which is a positive real number and which will be called the weight of the edge E1 let us look at an example let us consider a graph like this suppose these are the vertices A, B, C, D and E and the edges suppose E1, E2, E3, E4, E5 and E6 now each edge are assigned to some weights possibly the edge E1 is assigned to 1, 2, 3, 5, 4 and 7 so that means that WE1 or in this case since this is a simple graph we can also say that WEAB is equal to 1, WE2 is equal to WBC is equal to 2, WAC, WE3 equal to WAC equal to 3, WE4 equal to WCE is equal to 7, WE5 equal to WAD equal to 5 and WE6 equal to WDE equal to 4 so these are the weights of the edges and this graph which was originally G equal to A, B, C, D, E and edges E1, E2, E3, E4, E5, E6 these graphs when we consider the function W from E1 up to E6 that is a set of edges to the set of real numbers defined as over here becomes a weighted graph now our problem here is that suppose I am given two vertices in a weighted graph how do we find out the shortest path from the first vertex to the second vertex and by the shortest path I mean that a path such that if we add up all the weights of the edges belonging to the path we will get the smallest value if we look at the graph that we just drew over here if we consider the vertices A and vertices C and suppose we want to go from vertex A to C we have got at least three paths one is A to B and B to C we see the total the total weight is 3 so we have got A to B and B to C A to B is 1 B to C is 2 so the weight is 1 plus 2 which is equal to 3 the total weight or otherwise if we could have gone from A to C the total weight is 3 well and the other possibility is from A to D D to E E to C A to D is 5 D to E is 4 and E to C is 7 so the total weight is 5 plus 4 plus 7 equal to 16 now of course the shortest paths are this or this now this is a small example and the graph is quite simple that is why by observing the graph and checking the weights it is possible to find out the shortest path but it may not be so when the graph is complicated we need an algorithm and Dijkstra's algorithm precisely gives us that so to say Dijkstra's algorithm gives us shortest path between two points now we move on to Dijkstra's algorithm suppose we have got a graph where we are labeling the vertices by A, B, C, D a small letter and the edges from one vertex to the other by an ordered pair so now this algorithm finds the length of a shortest path from the input vertices A and Z A and Z in a connected weighted graph the weight of the edge ij is Wij which is taken to be greater than 0 and the label of the vertex x is denoted by Lx now here in this algorithm to each vertex we assign a label which initially keeps on changing and after that comes to a fixed label and that label gives us the shortest length path by which I mean the path for which the sum of the weights is the smallest the shortest length path from the point A it is a vertex A to X and this labels will keep on changing and ultimately when we take the first input as A that is we want the shortest path from the vertex A and when we start calculating the labels at the end of the algorithm the label corresponding to Z will give the length of the shortest path from A to Z so the labels are denoted by Lx at the termination of the algorithm Lz is the length of the shortest path from A to Z now let us start discussing the algorithm so first step is input our input is a connected weighted graph in which all weights are positive vertices A and Z so we have got two inputs so to say one is the graph on which we would like to apply the algorithm and two vertices in that graph between which we want to know the shortest path now the output is Lz which is the length of the shortest path from A to Z now we come to the algorithm that we denote by Dijkstra W this W is the weight function of the graph G that we are using and A Z and the function L which we will see how to compute now in first step we will put La equal to 0 and for all vertices x not equal to a Lx is infinity so what we are doing in the beginning is that we know from our input that from which vertex we have to calculate the shortest path we are putting the label of that vertex to be 0 that is that step La equal to 0 and all the other vertices are labeled as infinity now T is the set of vertices other than no we leave it at set of vertices and then we will process this T now in the first step we come like this that is while Z belongs to T we start this loop choose V belonging to T minimum L V and then remove V from T and build up a new T and then for each x belonging to T adjacent to V do Lx equal to minimum of Lx and Lv plus Wvx and return so let us see what happens our starting set of vertices is a set of all vertices and then among them among that in T we find the smallest smallest weight vertex that is a vertex with the smallest level and we choose it and then we delete it from T so then we will get a set of vertices other than that vertex that we have deleted and then what we do is that we start scanning all the vertices which are adjacent to the deleted vertex and then we will calculate this quantity after calculating this quantity now my T is changed I go again into this and we again do the same process so this loop will keep on happening and this loop also will keep on happening let us look at an example to clarify this matter this is a then a is connected to b and the weight is 3 b is connected to d the weight is 2 d is connected to g the weight is 3 then b is connected to e the weight is 4 and here a e the weight is 9 now here a is connected to c and the weight of the edge is 2 c is connected to e the weight of the edge is 6 after that e is connected to g the weight of the edge is 1 now e is connected to h the weight being 2 and c is connected to f the weight being 9 f is connected to h the weight being 1 and here g is connected to j the weight being 5 and g j the weight being 5 again and here j is connected to l the weight is 5 h is connected to l the weight is 9 f is connected to i the weight is 2 i is connected to k the weight is 2 again h is connected to k which is 6 and k is connected to l which is 3 now suppose somebody tells me that my input vertices are a and l and I have to find out the shortest path between a and l how do I start now let us go according to the algorithm proposed by Dijkstra step wise in the first step my t is a whole set of vertices of the graph given graph so let us denote the graph by g now and then what I do before that is that we our starting vertex is l a so l a is put to 0 l of anything else x is infinity for all x belonging to v g minus l minus a so other than a all vertices are put to infinity now we start with t now in the first step we will consider the vertex which has got the least level value and in this case it is a so we will remove from t the vertex a so see a has the least l value so remove a from t so I calculate t which is t minus a now in that we have to consider all the vertices which are adjacent to a the vertices adjacent to a are b e and c now we use the formula that is for all x for each x belonging to t adjacent to v l x equal to minimum l x l v plus w v comma x so this portion of the algorithm is to be used now so what do I do here my v is equal to a and the adjacent vertices are b e and c so I calculate l of b to be minimum of l of b comma l of v that is l of a plus w a to b now we see that l of b is infinity and l of a is 0 w a b is 3 so we have got a choice between infinity and 3 so the minimum is going to be 3 then l of e is going to be minimum of l of e and then l of a plus w a e and using the same argument it is going to be 9 and similarly l of c is going to be 2 which is minimum of l of c l of a plus w a c now we see that now we have a graph where I do not consider a anymore so that is my new t and b has bed 3 or sorry b has level 3 e has level 9 c has level 2 and all the others have level infinity now when we look we go into again the while loop and we choose from t the minimum vertex that is vertex with minimum level value and that level value is going to be c over here so I can put the level of c to be equal to 2 incidentally level of a is 0 and then I will cut out c from t so now my t was t minus a original t minus a this is my t and now my in next iteration my t will be essentially t minus a minus c so I will have I will also delete c now when I have when I have deleted c now I will calculate the new level values for the vertices adjacent to c now what are the vertices adjacent to c the vertices adjacent to c are e and f okay now again we will come to this step for each of these vertices we have to calculate this quantity so l of e now we know that e has a level value that is equal to 9 so I have to take the minimum of le and lc plus w c to e now that is minimum of 9 and lc is 2 plus c to e is just 6 so I have to choose between 9 and 8 and which is of course 8 so we see that the level value of e has decreased so we will put le equal to 8 and lf equal to minimum lf which is infinity and lc plus w cf if we do lc plus w cf then we have minimum between infinity and lc plus w cf is going to be 11 so it is 11 so now we come back to our original graph we see that e is now labeled as level of e is equal to 8 and level of f is equal to 11 and level of b remains at 3 and we have cut out c now we go to the next iteration then we go to the next iteration our vertices which we have to consider are b e f and rest of the vertices are infinity among them we see the b is the smallest so we have to start with b which is 3 so we are essentially cutting out b and then we are recomputing the levels so b is adjacent to d d is already infinity so therefore this value ld is going to be 5 when we come to le we will see that it is even shorter than before and because if we go from a to b that is 3 and b to e that is 7 so I have to compare between 7 and 8 so this value of l is going to change to 7 so I have got le equal to 7 and ld equal to 5 and these are these are the vertices which are adjacent to b so after we cut off b then again we have to look at the graph so I have got a is a b then we have d over here then we have g over here j over here l over here and c f we have e and then we have h is connected to j h is connected to k and f both and now the weights we see that this is 3 2 4 2 3 5 and this is 1 and this is 5 this is 5 3 9 6 2 2 here this is 9 and this is 1 now what we see over here and this in between is 2 now what we see over here that we have taken care of 3 we have taken care of 3 vertices la is of course 0 and we have find that found that lb equal to 3 lc equal to 2 these are not surprising but because of our algorithm we have come to understand that le has a smallest value 7 and ld is equal to 5 lf is equal to 11 now if we look at this one then we will see that if we look at this one then we will see that now I do not have to consider bc bac so now I will consider the values of d e and f so ld is 5 le is 7 and lf is 11 now among this of course I will choose ld so I will take out ld so this also will go away and then I have to find out the vertices adjacent to ld sorry adjacent to d and calculate its l value the only vertex which is adjacent to d is g and its l value is going to be 5 plus 3 that is lg will be 8 and then so I will go to the next step now I will have I have to consider g e and f and when I consider g e and f then I am going to get e as the vertex with smallest level so this is the vertex with smallest level so I have cut yeah so I have to cut out e and then consider the vertices which are adjacent to e the vertices adjacent to e are h and g both in case of h e is 7 so it is 8 and this is 7 plus 8 is 9 so lh equal to 9 so in this way we have to proceed and if I keep on proceeding in this way eventually I will get the l values of the other vertices we have given l values of several but let me list down I will get la equal to 0 lb equal to 3 lc equal to 2 ld equal to 5 l equal to 7 lf equal to it will come to 10 because we will find when we calculate from h we will find that this is 1 and h is 9 9 plus 1 is 10 so lf will at one stage come to 10 and lg lg will be 8 lh will be 9 li it will come to 12 lk lj lj will be 11 lk will be 14 and eventually ll will be 17 and what is the root for 17 we will have to go to b then from b we will come back to e so a to b b to e and then e to we will go to h like this from h we will have to come back to f yeah so f value is 10 and then from f I will have to go to i i to k and eventually k to l so we see that lk is 14 so l l is going to be 17 and that is the shortest path we have to keep on doing going through the iterations and we will get this so this is Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm in action and this is the end of today's talk thank you.


So today guys, I want to go over all the materials and currency which you can get within Biomutant. Check out how and where they are obtained and also what they do and can be used for. How's it going guys, my name's theepj and if you enjoyed the video, leaving a like really helps out and if you'd like what you see and want to see more Biomutant, be sure to subscribe. So everything Biomutant materials are very very helpful. When it comes to crafting new weapons and armour, they're an absolute must and today we've got over each material where they are obtained and I can get them very easily. So the materials within this game are clink, plank, polymer, rubber and e-waste, basically metal, wood, plastic, rubber and e-waste, whatever that is. These materials are used when it comes to crafting if you want to build a certain item together. It notifies you of what you need and early on in the game these materials it seems you'll find yourself short on them. Now for the most part materials are found randomly within the world via material towers, that's what I'm calling them, material towers, which you simply have to smash to get said materials. Now it seems as though what you get from these are used completely random. Earlier on I was getting between 2 and 5, they could also depend on the power of your melee weapon too, at least I have no idea on. But there are these kinds of towers everywhere on the map and they notify you when you get close to them as one for each material type. Now you can also get materials from killing certain enemies too, I mean they aim as consistent as material towers but they're still there. Another way to get easy materials is to scrap unwanted armour pieces, these you don't realise how much you accumulate so for sure get rid of that old junk you weren't ever going to use. Also within your inventory you can again scrap everything you don't need here and like I said it does accumulate for sure. I will add you are maxed at 99 pieces of each material type so keep that in mind and I know some watching this will think well I'll never get to that number. Let me tell you guys they rack up quite quickly without you even knowing especially when you start scrapping and dismantling things you're never going to use. So on to the currency and the currency in this game is called green. It can be used to purchase things within the game which you will need from health packs, weapon parts, armour and more. So the more you have the better obviously and green can be obtained from various different sources. The easiest way to get it is to just scour the map and look out for these kind of bushes which you jump through and they reward you green. Another way to get green is to also kill enemies and loot them. This isn't a guarantee but for sure can sometimes see decent amounts come from certain enemies. Now the best way in my opinion without a shadow of doubt to get that green is to loot absolutely everything guys because although some loot will be very very useful to you and that loot you do want to keep other loot as you progress through the game becomes useless and while this loot can be sold to the many many vendors within the game which can be found all over the map in towns and more people and it gives you plenty of green and I mean plenty of it. So yes that's what you use green for and how you get it and guys that is it for the materials. Now I've done standalone videos on bio points and PSI points if you want to check them out you'll find them on my channel. But yes guys I hope you enjoyed the video and if it helped you out leaving a like really helps me out. People if you're new around here want to see more Biomew and be sure to subscribe and if you never want to miss a video I upload you can turn notifications on by hitting that bell button but guys thanks as always for stopping by and hopefully I will see you on that next one.


Hi everyone, Joe for jazpeascasefrakes.com coming at you with a quick random number block randomizer for the Bucks Thunder Rockets and Cavs This helps knock out 10 box picker team one and one 15 for one and one big thanks to this group here for making it happen appreciate it There are the numbers right there the block of numbers. Let's roll it randomize it one and a four five times one two three three four and fifth and final time We got Griffin down to Griffin remember the downtown cards are not numbered So those will be randomized to someone in this group if it's a downtown for any of those teams down there One and a four five times for the numbers one two three four And once more fifth and final time we got five down to four Alright, so Griffin with five Patrick with two Gretchen with zero and one Zero any and all redemptions, but including one of ones, but you also have one so your bases are covered Gretchen Gretchen with six as well Rashid with eight Thomas with seven Patrick with nine Nick with three Griffin with four. Let's order these numerically And coming up in a separate video will be that one and one break We'll see you for that a little bit later tonight. Jasper's case, please


When I walk through this park, I just don't see overgrown grass and weeds and stuff. I see people and I see souls and I see families enjoying themselves. We have people that is willing to help. This is our community. They see it being revived and they see in life coming back.


So let's start wrapping it up. How about we address the last essential question about how the past affects one's present? So what do you guys think? How has the past influenced America's present day view on things? I think that America learns from their past and tries to make changes to make sure that bad things in the past, as it would say, line 71, where the answer is yes, they intend to move forward, where the answer is no programs were on. This shows that programs that were bad have ended and they've learned from their mistakes and they're going to keep the good things moving. I think like on a line 147, in the year of America's birth, in the coldest of months, a small band of patriots huddled by dying campfires on the shores of an icy river. I think that he's saying that we should be like that and how they died trying to have America be independent from being a connolly of Britain.


This study examined the perceptions of medical students in Germany about racism in medicine and healthcare. It found that medical students perceived racism as a widespread problem in the country but had difficulty identifying it due to a lack of understanding of its definition and manifestation. Additionally, students felt uncomfortable when confronted with racist behavior or structures and believed that medical education should provide more comprehensive anti-racism training. This article was authored by Gerhard's, Simon Matteo, Schwede, Mark, and Wessel Merle.


Myself, Mrs. Veena Sunil Patki, Assistant Professor, Department of Electronics Engineering, Vulturen Institute of Technology, Solapur, welcome you for this session. At the end of this session, students can solve the numerical on RLC series circuit. So, let us see the first numerical. A pure resistance of 50 ohms is in series with pure capacitance of 100 microfarads. The series combination is connected across 100 volt 50 hertz supply. Find A, the impedance, B, current, C, power factor, D, phase angle, E, voltage across resistor, F, voltage across capacitor and draw vector diagram. So, first we are going to write down the given data. So, resistance is 50 ohm, capacitance is 100 microfarad, voltage is 100 volt and frequency 50 hertz. So, as the C equal to 100 microfarad. So, here capacitive reactance we can calculate as xc equal to 1 by 2 pi fc equal to 1 by 2 pi into 50 into 100 into 10 raise to minus 6 as capacitance is given in microfarad. Here we are going to multiply that capacitance by 10 raise to minus 6. So, after calculating here we will get the capacitive reactance xc equal to 32 ohms. So, you can see here resistance and capacitance both are connected in series and the V equal to Vm sin omega t is the applied voltage. So, let us calculate the impedance first z equal to under root r square plus xc square equal to under root 50 square plus 32 square equal to 59.4 ohm. Our current calculation i equal to V by z equal to 100 by 59.4 equal to 1.684 ampere and power factor we can calculate by using the formula r by z equal to 50 by 59.4. So, power factor equal to 0.842 leading. So, circuit is capacitive so power factor is leading and phase angle we can calculate as phi equal to cos inverse of 0.842 equal to 32.3. So, here we will get the phase angle as 32.3 degrees. So, voltage across resistor we can calculate as V r equal to i into r that is 50 into 1.684 equal to 84.2 volt and voltage across capacitor is given by i into xc. So, here 32 into 1.684 equal to 53.9 volt is the voltage across capacitor. So, for phasor diagram we are going to use V r equal to 84.2 volt Vc equal to 53.9 volt and phi equal to 32.3 degrees. So, first you draw the current vector V r is in phase with the current and Vc lags with the current as the current leads to the capacitive voltage and the total voltage for resistive and capacitive series circuit for that draw the parallelogram and here we will get the total voltage V. So, theta is the angle between total voltage V and i and here you can see the current leads voltage by 32.3 degrees. Now, we are going to solve the second numerical that is a equal. So, second numerical is a 120 volt 60 watt lamp is to be operated on 220 volt 50 hertz supply. Calculate what value of a non inductive resistance and b pure inductance would be required in order that lamp is run on correct voltage which method which method is preferable and why means the rating of lamp is given and we have to connect that lamp for 220 volt 50 hertz supply and we have to calculate the resistance and inductance. So, first we are going to consider if the resistance is connected in series with the lamp that is non inductive resistance is nothing, but the pure resistance is connected in series with the lamp. So, here you can see the diagram. So, bulb having 60 watt lamp and 120 volt rating is connected in series with the resistance. So, V R is the voltage across that resistance. Now, the total voltage V equal to 220 volt and frequency is 50 hertz. So, the voltage across register we can calculate as V R equal to 220 minus 120 equal to 100 volt because both voltage and resistance both bulb and resistance having the same phase because lamp is nothing, but the resistive and the resistance is connected in series with the lamp. So, both voltages are in phase. So, lamp rating is 120 volt 60 watt. So, current through the lamp we can calculate as P equal to V i or i equal to P divided by V. So, here current through the lamp we can calculate as 60 by 120 that is 0.5 ampere and voltage across resistance is in phase with applied voltage. So, R equal to V R by i equal to 100 by 0.5 equal to 200 ohm. Now, for second condition here if inductance is connected in series with the lamp. So, potential difference across bulb is 120 volt and V L is the voltage across inductor. We can calculate that V L by using this formula. So, the total voltage for series resistive and inductive circuit is given by under root V R square plus V L square. So, after putting the values here the V L equal to under root 220 square minus 120 square equal to 184.4 volt that is the voltage across inductive that is the voltage across inductance. Now, here V L equal to i into X L. So, by putting the values of V L and i we can calculate the X L. So, V L equal to 184.4 equal to 0.5 into L into 2 pi into 50. So, here directly L we can calculate as because X L equal to 2 pi f L directly we have used that formula here and L is equal to 184.4 divided by 0.5 into 3.14 equal to 1.17 Henry. So, here R equal to 200 ohm and L equal to 1.17 Henry. So, method B is preferable that is second method is preferable because in method B there is no loss of power. Ohmic resistance of 200 ohm itself dissipates the large power that is 100 into 0.5 equal to 50 watt. But in inductive circuit pure inductance no power consumption is there power consumption in the inductance is 0. So, here the second method is preferable. So, now pause the video and give the answer for this question the power factor of an RC series circuit is A often 0, B between 0 and 1, C always unity and between 0 and minus 1. So, what is the answer? So, here answer is B between 0 and 1. So, you can refer the book Electrical Technology by B. L. Thareja. Thank you.


Hey, this is Mary with Brad Ransom from the 21 Convention Melbourne. We're on the last day so You were talking about guys wait for the perfect approach the perfect situation. Does that ever come up or how do they avoid that? Yeah I think the biggest challenge that most guys have is they're super like analytical and then they're trying to find like What the situation is especially if there's guys or girls around and everything now is looking like okay now It's the right time and for me the reason why I think most guys get into this basically is that they're they want to be the selector So it's kind of I talked about doing this each day is being the one that that's the girl I want and pushing over the hurdles kind of what's ever in place there Because it's kind of like a life thing to move towards is there's always gonna be something in your way He's kind of got to deal with deal with the punches as they go in there And I think most guys have a very idealistic view of what pickup is basically Everything as opposed to just like taking what they want and dealing with things So I think I keep up his energy and momentum like we're just sitting at home He's like well, I could go out tonight, but maybe I should maybe I should not really that energized or jazzed up to do it What should he do? I think the biggest thing is having if you have friends for me back in the day Before I had a big network of people that I was going out with I just had my roommate He wasn't even really into like pick up stuff at all, but what he said he was We just go out. He's like, yeah, let's go out and the nights that I didn't want to he pushed me And the nights that he didn't want to push him so having like that background is good But also I think the hardest part about going out solo is basically just getting out of the damn house So you just got to get me like what do you want out of this, right? If you if your goal is to be more successful have more success you got to do it take action And have that mental discipline so guys out there want to see more of your stuff They're like they see this video and they're like, oh my gosh for that guy. He's fantastic. Are they going to see you? Lately it's been the YouTube channel so I've been doing all the V blogs like this type of stuff And that's just through my YouTube channel, which is rst Brad Just rst Brad on YouTube if you just Google Brad Branson I'll my kind of blog come up and I feel that pretty much almost any sticking point or problem guy would have You'd easily access it from Brad Branson.com Okay, this is Mary with the 21 convention from Melbourne. I'll show you with Brad Branson. Bye guys. See ya