Gink, gink, gink, gink, shoo. No! Ooh, that's a hot mug, guys. This took significantly less time to review than the first season. I can celebrate that. Hey guys, this is my review for All Hell breaks loose part two, the season finale. This was the first actual season finale to have Carrie on my wayward son as the road so far, first, every time using that. In season one, it was the pre-season finale recap, whereas in this one, it started the trend that has been consistent ever since and leading up to the eventual end of the show whenever that's happening.  The directing is night and day between those two episodes. Part one is directed by Robert Singer and it's a decently directed episode, but Kim Manners directs the second part and his effort, his workmanship, just outshines singers in every way. Manners is a much better visual storyteller. He uses the techniques that he trademarked and really exceptionally displayed in the X files and he brings that into this ultimate strife and he really gets the most out of the actors even when some of the circumstances are a little bit rushed. We see Dean is just at the edge of it. He is looking at his dead brother and he doesn't know what to do with himself, which is kind of awkward when Bobby walks in with a bucket of chicken and says, hey, I thought you might need this.  Oh, so we should probably bury him. It's a little bit of a comic, weird trip. After they get over this hurdle, the episode starts. We see Yellow Eyes' plan with Jake. We see that Jake is easily manipulated. We see that he's just gonna go along with Yellow Eyes' plan, which actually is the only problem I have with this episode and because while they try to develop Jake as a villainous character in this episode, they try to kind of display his turnover to accepting of Yellow Eyes. It just happens too quickly. There's not enough development. You know how I got pissed off when they tried to make God a villain in the last 20 minutes of Supernatural really, the last 10 minutes of season 14? Jake almost has the exact same amount of screen time in terms of going evil. We have three scenes with him. We have him having the conversation with Yellow Eyes.  The second time we see Jake is when he's at the train tracks and Yellow Eyes is like, here, take the gun. And while I'm nitpicking on this part, I do gotta give credit to the actor who played Yellow Eyes. Every single scene he's in in this second season is fantastic and this is actually probably my favorite exchange of his is when he hands him the gun because he's like, this is the only gun that can kill me and Jake turns it around on him. Oh my, how could I have not seen this unforeseen events? He then says, hey, I could make you rich and powerful and Jake's like, hmm. And then the third time we see him is when they're at the door. He's developed Jedi mind tricks faster than Rey developed invincibility in all of her Jedi powers and he just goes full evil. And that is my nitpick, is that Jake just doesn't get enough time. However, there isn't really any time you could put that development into because the focus is so much on Dean making the deal to bring his brother back. And that's a central point that is actually far more important than Jake even though Jake is actually the one who brings about this mini little apocalypse. Going back to Dean and Sam, the interaction with Dean and Sam's corpse is one of my favorite pieces of acting from Jensen in this whole season. We already had what is and what should never be but this is just so good too because we get this raw emotion from him where he's talking about old memories with his brother and then he says, what am I supposed to do? What am I supposed to do?  Comes up to that cross run.  As they start to play out the deal, we work all the way down to a year. And little did I know when I watched this episode what was going to transpire because holy shit, I did not expect what would happen in season three to happen when they did this deal but he makes the deal one year for Sam's life. Comes back, Sam's kind of a little bit interested in the fact that he got full on stabbed in the spinal cord.  Then this leads to my next favorite scene in this episode. While I said that Bobby was kind of a little bit odd bringing in the bucket of chicken with the corpse on the table, the acting here between Dean and Bobby is so good because Bobby is just filled with rage but he's also filled with sorrow because Dean is following along the path of his father. Oh, it's such good chemistry between the two. It's such a great scene. The emotion between the two actors is fantastic. Jensen, once again, being like, I had to do it. He's my baby brother. Really good writing too. Definitely give Kripke good points for doing really great writing in this episode. Sarah Gamble wrote part one and she did a pretty decent job but obviously Kripke is just like nailing it except for Jake. But unfortunately it was just kind of caught in that corner with that. Then Alan kind of just appears and they find out that there is this super devil's trap made out of train tracks on this one graveyard which just so happens to be a gate to hell. This is actually something that's not entirely explained. I kind of wonder what this door was. Maybe they might talk about it more in season three. It's been a while since the scene season three so hopefully that might get cleared up a bit but it is a little bit of an awkward kind of, hey, did you realize we had this incredibly destructive and dangerous door right here? They go to the cemetery and they have this final standoff and coming back once again to Jake, it's the weakest point. He is the weakest part of this entire episode and this episode itself is pretty strong and his performance despite what he's given is still pretty decent and he's gone on to have a little bit more of a successful career. I know he was in Black Mirror. He got to give him credit too because he's been only introduced in the previous episode. We see him taking this big step as this kind of relatable antagonistic character. The first two scenes of him in this episode are kind of having us sort of relate, sort of being remorseful for the character as to why he's doing what he does and then the third one, he just goes pure evil so it feels like we missed this step into what made him go all the way. Again, it's like the only negative but they couldn't really have done anything else. I don't know what they could have done except maybe extend the episode but with time constrictions they are obviously kind of put into a corner and there's nothing that I could say that could have been cut. Nothing could have been shortened down to add this part in without feeling it being no more than like a minute if that. Jake opens up the door after being able to almost make Helen kill herself and Sam fully blows him away. I thought this was actually a little bit of a tidbit thing that just wasn't addressed again really but thinking about it now when Yellow Eyes says to Dean, do you think that who you brought back is 100% Sam? It really doesn't come into play in season three at all but season three had its own issues with it being in the writer's strike and the fact that it's as decent as it is is pretty impressive considering all things and it's much more of a central story but that's when I start reviewing season three. This is playing in to Sam becoming who he's supposed to become leading into season five. I didn't really realize that until just now and I'm pretty certain that's the insinuation that's going on here but it's still pretty cool little prelude. Gate is open and like one of the most expensive visual effects of all the demons flying up at the screen is like whoa. Then they have the standoff with Yellow Eyes. It's a pretty cool standoff. You totally think they're totally screwed and then all of a sudden John Winchester comes in as a ghost and while the scene is cool and while even though they don't say a word to each other you see it all in their emotions. The fact that they had to shoot this in a studio and do terrible green screen work. Ehh. There's a reason why they're so close in on the actor's face is because the green screen work is terrible and I'm trying to remember the commentary now but I think that there was a scheduling issue. They had to reshoot the scene or because Jared had hurt himself he wasn't able to be there so to try and make it all natural they had to reshoot it again. They couldn't bring John back too for the scenes that Sam had to shoot so that's why they did it this way. Ehh. It's awkward. It's unfortunate too because it's such a great scene. Nothing said but all visually told.  Sam unfortunately finds out why he is alive but he promises to help Dean. That's a very short conversation too and again, like I said they're really trying to cram in as much as they can without making it feel over bloated and the episode ends with the exact same shot albeit Dean saying the line instead of Sam that was the end of the pilot and that is All Hell breaks loose part two. It's a fantastic episode. It has great tension, it has great writing it has great character moments. It has great emotion. The only negative is that the secondary antagonist character just doesn't get enough time to fully develop himself and that is my one complaint and it's actually the only reason why I'm not gonna give this episode a seven. Jake just brings it down just a little bit it's not this perfection, it's not this perfect episode and that's why I'm gonna give All Hell breaks loose a six out of seven. It's still an exceptional. If I did like a 0.5 I would give it a 6.5 but I don't do that. Obviously I asked you guys for your comments about this episode so let's see what you guys have to say. So going back to a comment that was in the what is and what should never be episode review All Hell breaks loose part two I like for some more great acting from Jensen in the first part of the episode the rest of the episode is fine but not my favorite season ending for me even though it put Azazel behind them. Oh wow, 200 demons escaped. Seems so non-eventful compared to the future apocalypses. And yes, I'll agree with that too. The stakes that happened at the end it kind of just seems like it's a lot of demons. Okay, at the time considering how difficult it was to obviously defeat a demon, it was a big threat but it was kind of oddly placed in terms of what it meant it just meant there was more demons to face but this was like the super demon so it had the image of a big threat at the time but obviously further events have completely demitigated this. I will agree with that that part has not aged the best. All Hell breaks loose part two is an excellent finale. There are some great moments from Dean including a heartbreaking monologue from Jensen in the brother's conversation at the end. Great job providing resolution for the brothers avenging Mary while also setting up the premise for season three. The ending does well to do bring some suspense and Dean's impending death along with glimpses into Sam's corruption from demon blood and Dean's self loathing slash suicidal tendencies. This ending also really cements the boys in the hunter life. Up until now they've only really cared about the personal vendetta for their mom. With their father's mission complete it's now more about saving each other and accepting a greater role to protect the world. I can't wait for season three, probably my top season. That's cool because it's also my top season. My only critiques for this episode is that I still think Jake's willingness to turn to the dark side is very forced and unbelievable and I think the threat that a demon makes to end Sam's life if they attempt to save Dean doesn't hold water when the entirety of season three is all about a way of finding a way out. But overall a well-placed engaging episode and though the whole secret keeping trope is overused now I approve of the dramatic element for this instance alone. This is not the first time there's been a real secret because Dean had the secret that their father told them at the beginning of season two but yeah I see what you mean now this beginning of this overused trope. Jake's willingness was just too much. As for the threat that the demon says I think they had to do that because otherwise you needed to figure out some means of putting Dean in this kind of impossible situation which just made season three all the more enjoyable because the whole time you're kind of just wondering how the hell is he gonna get out of this? And that's what I liked about that threat. I loved All Hell Breaks Loose Part Two. It was a nice ending for the first two seasons killing Yellow Eyes and their dad escaping hell and going to heaven which has kind of technically been confirmed but at the same time, I don't know Sam and Dean get that moment with their dad also and that scene where Bobby is just glaring at Dean when he sees Sam alive. Dean can't even look Bobby in the eye. It was kind of intense. Yep, no, it's great. Like I said, after the Bucket of Chicken incident, Bobby gets a lot better. In my opinion, All Hell Breaks Loose Part Two is definitely better than Part One. It was interesting all the way through. I love the acting in the episode, especially the conversation with Dean and Bobby. I love the ending as well and it segues perfectly into season three. Yes, it does. I'm very, very excited going into season three. For Part Two, great moments and insights to the beginning of the end for me. Dean's numerous emotional scenes are great. Sam's showing some dark side. Jeffrey Dean Morgan appearing, Yellow Eyes, good stuff but the Crossroad deal leads to the stuff that killed the show for me.  It just became too much of the same thing over and over. At least the second EG in this season alone.  Overall, I like the finale, Bad Omen's and all.  Obviously in the show's lifetime, I feel that season three works well, especially with the Mystery Spot episode, just giving Sam just that horrible, I will horrible living nightmare of seeing his brother die over and over again. And after season five, dad, the amount of times that the characters have been brought back, obviously doesn't mean anything anymore. I think it's because I watched this live and I watched it as it was coming out week by week, month by month. That's how I'm able to remember these moments and these seasons and that's what makes them so prominent and so enjoyable to me. If you watch this and it's a normal kind of binge watch, yeah, I think it wouldn't have nowhere near the amount of effect that it did, but especially when we get to the end of season three, holy shit, that episode still scars me. In this episode is where the Winchester trope of keeping secrets from each other begins. Well, it already started with what their dad had said, but yeah, I get where you're going. But unlike years to come where it was for dramatic purposes only, this one actually pushes the plot forward in the next season. Kind of a dull episode for me. I do remember the iconic slow-mo shot of the cult which got too overused in later seasons. Well, they've done, oh man, I don't even know. I thought they'd just never afford doing this again. And John's ghost returning from hell to save his boys, which kind of opened a plot hole for future seasons exactly where he's suddenly safe in heaven with Mary at the end of season 14. I digress. I'm looking forward to you reviewing the next season because it's the best season next to season eight in this show. Oh, really? Oh, like J.J. really likes season eight. I feel that season three is my favorite one. Season five is the best one, but season three is my favorite one. Anyways, those are the comments. Thank you guys again for all of your reviews for watching me review all of season two. Admittedly, I did start off fast and then I kind of petered off at the beginning of the year, but obviously everything with this has helped me. Season three is 16 episodes. By that logic, I could watch two episodes a week and be done in eight weeks. I'm gonna try and do three. It depends on how long this COVID thing lasts. Obviously, season two review is gonna be coming up. Also, I'm gonna be doing list videos. I'm gonna be doing my top five best episodes and my top five worst episodes for both season one and two. Season two is gonna be hard. This is no worst episode. It's like one bad one. So it's gonna kind of also be like the least best episodes. But thank you guys again for joining me on this adventure. And I guess maybe if you want, give me your guys' thoughts on where you think season two places in the core five seasons and what makes season two stand out from other seasons, what you like about season two, what are some detractors from it. And those have got really good insightful comments. I'll read those off when I do my season two review. Anyways, thank you guys once again for watching this video. I hope you enjoyed it. If you did, leave a like and if you're interested in more subscribe. Otherwise, I'll see you guys next time. Thanks for watching the video. My name is Nitz, and you might remember me from the animated cult classic TV show, Undergrads. It's been a while, but I'm happy to say the click is finally getting back together in an all new movie, thanks to a successful Kickstarter campaign. But we are still asking for your support. To see any and all updates about the upcoming Undergrads movie, be sure to check out and like the Bring Back Undergrads Facebook page. And with any luck, we'll see you guys soon.


So, just like with my transitions, I can actually apply sort of miniature transitions, if you will, to elements inside of my PowerPoint presentation. For example, this About Us page. Maybe I don't want it to immediately show everything. Right now, if I run this PowerPoint, you see it shows me everything. As soon as I go from essential Norway to about us, I see everything. Some people don't like this, and this is a trade-off. Some people do. Some people don't. Now, what I can do is I can highlight all of that text, and if I come over to now my animations section, this is where I can do the exact same thing as I did with transitions. I have all of these different options I can go through. Again, just like I told you kind of with my soapbox with transitions, don't go crazy with it. You know, that's honestly, okay, well, that's not the greatest thing in the world. I keep these as subtle as possible, so something like fade. Fade's okay. Fade and appear, my go-tos, actually, whenever I need to do this. But you notice right now, they're all appearing at the same time. Right here, you see I'm getting this like one, one, one, one, one, one, well, maybe I don't want that. Maybe instead, what I want to do is I want to turn this into something where it starts instead of all at the same time with a click. Now if I change that to on click, notice that all of a sudden it goes from one, one, one, one, one, one, one to one, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight. I can even change this further. Maybe I want my train ride, say the Bergen Railway and the Flam Railway, really? Maybe I want this guy right here, number four, instead of it to be its own click, which it is right now, sorry. If I were to run this, it's one, two, three, four, five. Instead I want it to appear with previous and you notice the numbers change. Suddenly it went from four to three. I'm going to do the same thing with here. I'm going to change it from on click to with previous and now my train ride should be one, two, three. Now both my railways appear and that's fine because I'm talking about train rides. I can talk about both of them at the same time so I don't need to click through both of them. I can just click once and it will apply that. As you can imagine I can do the same with the fewer truises with previous to those words and those words. I can't pronounce that stuff. What are you kidding me? Come on. One, two, three, four. It allows me to apply these transitions. The one thing say for example you have completely ignored what I say and you're like, I want to do the fly in one, well one of the things you might have noticed is I can make them go all the way from the bottom to the top or I can actually change that with my effect options which allow me to specify from where. I'm going to say from right. They come in from the right. Now when I run it, they come in from the right. You're saying, hey, what happened to my animations? One of the things that I can do is I can actually use the same effect option and instead I can go in and I can maybe change them again. Go in and on click. Again it's going to take it from the with previous and it will allow me to change it as well. Now again, oh we go from this left. We go from the left each time. So it just allows us to maybe add a little bit of a dynamic to something that is pretty static but in result again soapbox I know try and keep them as simple as possible.


Let's talk about static equilibrium. I've got a mass here supported by two strings. We say this is static equilibrium because it's static, it's not moving, it's at rest. And equilibrium because all of the forces here acting on that mass are balanced. In fact, it's a great application of Newton's first law, which tells us that an object at rest will continue in a state of rest until a net force acts on it. And sometimes students think that means that there's no forces acting on this object, but there are lots of forces acting on it. It's just that there's no net force. That means if I add all the forces together that are acting on this mass, they'll all cancel out, or they'll add up to zero. So how can we go and determine what forces are acting here? One of the common things you get asked is what is the force of tension in these two strings? And we can solve for that by doing a free body diagram. The first force I'd put in my free body diagram is the force of gravity acting downwards on this mass. Then there are two forces of tension as well. There's one here for that horizontal force of tension and one for this diagonal force of tension. After I've made my free body diagram, I can redraw those forces into a triangle. And it's going to make a right angle triangle. We can measure the angle the string makes with the vertical. I measured that earlier to be 38 degrees. And I can put that into my diagram. Lastly, I can calculate one side of that triangle because I know the mass. In this case it's 500 grams or half a kilogram. So I can use Newton's second law. Force of gravity equals m, the mass of the object, times g, the acceleration due to gravity. I can put in one other side of the triangle. Now all that's left is to do a little bit of trigonometry to go and work out the other two sides of the triangle. The horizontal side of the triangle will be the force of tension from the horizontal rope. And the diagonal or hypotenuse of that triangle will end up being the force of tension in the diagonal rope. Here's another situation and it's a little bit trickier. I've got the same mass, it's 500 grams, and it's suspended by two strings. And each of them make the same angle. In this case it's an angle of 40 degrees from the horizontal. So what's the force of tension in these two ropes? We're going to start off in the same way. Let's make a free body diagram. The force of gravity going downwards, acting on that mass. And in this case there's two forces of tension going in the same direction as each of those ropes. They'll have the same magnitude, but they'll be going in opposite directions. So once I've got my free body diagram drawn out, I can go through and make that into a triangle just like I did before. Now it won't be a right angle triangle, but I can still solve it to find out what each of those forces of tension are. So if you've got a ruler and protractor, you can go through and make that diagram and solve that vector addition really easily just through graphical analysis. And I've got a video showing you how to go through and do that. If you don't feel like busting out the ruler and protractor, there's another way you can do it as well. Think about just one of those two ropes. I'm going to think about this one here. I know I have a force of tension acting in the diagonal. And I can break that force of tension into kind of like two components. One component here going horizontally and one going up vertically. Now that component that's going up vertically is going to take half of the weight or half of the force of gravity of this mass. So what I could do is I could take the force of gravity of the mass and I could divide it by two and make that equal to this upwards pulling y component of the hypotenuse of that triangle. Then I can go through and solve for the hypotenuse using some simple trig. I don't have to go through and draw that with a ruler and protractor. I like that method. It's a little faster, but you have to remember that you have to divide the weight by two. Reason being that each of those two strings are going to take half of the overall force of gravity on that mass. And sometimes students forget to do that. So make sure you're comfortable with one of those two methods. For more help with static equilibrium, check out this old video that I've got dealing with the same sorts of concepts. Or check out my website, ldindustries.ca.


Suspense this is the man in black here again to introduce Columbia's program suspense Tonight heading our Hollywood cast are two noted leading men one mr. Preston Forster the star long established The hero of many an adventurous film the latest the 20th century Fox production Guadalcanal diary the other mr. Dane Clark a newcomer to the screen whose auspicious debut in action in the North Atlantic has made him warmly welcome in these parts Mr. Clark appears tonight as a young man who awoke one morning to find himself in a very serious jam And mr. Foster as the San Francisco homicide detective who was willing to help his friend up to a point The play called the singing walls by Robert L. Richards adapted from the story by Cornell will rich is tonight's tale of suspense If you've been with us before you will know that suspense is component of mystery and suspicion and dangerous adventure In this series or tales calculated to intrigue you to stir your nerves to offer you a precarious situation and then withhold the solution until the last possible moment and So it is with the performances of Preston Foster as detective Denny Sullivan and Dane Clark a young Tom Cochran We again hope to keep you in Suspense I never seen Joe before in my life. How you feeling now? Sure happened a little more. It's good for what is it? Then you're all right Sure, right? No Let's get out of here. I know a better place. Come on. Come on. I'll help you It's not a window it's freaked out. They put a building up right behind this one That's right. It comes right out of the walls Singin wall here. We got hot and cold running water here and singin wall Hey, like down lie down and take a little snooze sure I'll be right back. What's the matter? Have a little trouble in here while I was gone What's the blood? Sure blood all over your shirt Oh him oh All right, just put him in the closet lock the door Like that see now you put the key right in your pocket, so you'll know just where to find it Don't worry. He'll be all right No, I'm not going any place. I'll be back in just a minute here Have another have another I'll I'll be back in just a minute No No, no, let me out Let me out of here What is it knocking at your door the longest time you were having a dream or something Yeah, I What time is it? It's way after noon You came in pretty late. Did I? Toss me my bathroom will you sis don't you know what time you got in not exactly. Oh, Tommy I Know it's tough not having a job all these months And I know you've tried But this isn't doing any good. I know sis, but Last night was the first time in a month in any way. It was different. I Had a few drinks, but it was different Something happened. What do you mean something happened? Well, it wasn't just the drinks. They were doped or something No, look sis. It's not just an alibi. I don't remember where I was or anything only just now I seem to be dreaming about it about last night I could I could hear you banging on the door all the time I was dreaming and then it seemed as though I wasn't dreaming at all that I Was remembering a lot of things what sort of thing it was all mixed up There was a guy with a kind of a frog voice that kept giving me drinks And I was sort of floating Then there was a place that music came out of the walls There was something about blood on my shirt The key to a closet Tommy you're shaking like a leaf. Yeah It was a pretty scary dream if it was a dream what you need is some good hot coffee Now hurry up and get dressed and come on downstairs Here I'll get you out of clean shirt. I'd better wear the old one. I've only worn it once, but it's all messy Does look kind of Mildred what my shirt given to me now. What's the matter? Look Mildred? That's blood Guess it is. I know it is just like it wasn't the dream Tommy.  Well, then you got in the fight Maybe what else could it have been? Well, that's what I'm trying to think. Well, stop thinking and hurry up and get dressed My goodness look at the way you threw your clothes around last night Trousers on the floor here Here everything's falling out of the pocket. I'll pick it up. You get dressed. Thanks. You didn't come home with much Did you I didn't have much to start with well, I'll put it all up here on the bureau 25 cents and change in your keys now hurry. What'd you say? I Said hurry no no no before that. What'd you say? I said I put your change in your keys up in the bureau Keys yeah Mildred I only have one key. Well, they're two there now. I know let me see him here One's the key to the front door. Yeah, but the other one doesn't belong to any door in this house It's the key to the closet. What class last night. It wasn't a dream. Tell me. What are you talking about? Mildred You better call then you're right away. He's on duty. I know but get him over here right away. Tell me. What is it?  Listen, Denny. I mm-hmm. You were doped. All right Well, I didn't know what it was mind that now. How much do you remember look Denny? I hated to bring in on this night. I didn't know who else to go to skip it What's the use of having a brother-in-law who's a cop if he can't help you once in a while? How much do you remember?  You see There was this guy Joe just some guy I'd known from someplace. I don't know where See I met him on the street and he took me to the party and then the guy with the frog voice began to give me drinks and Then everything got confused I was in another place with the singing walls and some harmonica playing or something I don't even know whether it was in the same apartment even but that's where the closet was. What about the guy you? Dead guy. Well at first he wasn't there and then he was he was sort of slumped over in a big armchair Then frog voice put him in a closet. That's what I remember and then he left And then I suddenly seem to realize that the guy in the closet was dead and that's why I got out of there I don't know how you don't have any idea where it was No, no, I don't even know where the party was and you'd never seen any of these people before Except this guy Joe who took me to the party and that's all I know about him Then he just a guy named Joe that I knew from by sight from someplace. I don't know where or his last name or anything Not much to go on is a kid No, not much a guy named Joe singing walls in the closet another guy with a froggy voice Well, I'd recognize him or his voice if I ever saw him again Tommy you're in a jam Well, it looks right now. There's a dead man in a closet somewhere in this town and you killed him Oh, but Danny, I maybe it didn't if we find him before somebody else does maybe we can figure out what did happen The way it stands now. You're it. I know we haven't got much time either Paces an apartment. They probably would have found the body already and I'd know about it The hotel they check the guests out by six o'clock. That gives us about four hours Four hours For the murderer to find the guy he murdered It's kind of crazy, isn't it Tommy? You know how I feel about no good You know, I don't exactly hate you either. You know, I'll do everything in the world. I possibly can declare you sure Danny I know I'm a cop Tommy if you did it, you know, I'm gonna turn you in don't you sure I know that too Okay, kid now. Let's start in the beginning. What about this Joe? I I I don't know anything about him. You know his name. You know his face. Thank Tommy. Thank I'm trying to I Could only remember If I could only remember So a guy named Joe brought you huh? He came up here from Joe's place What's that? Oh? Yeah, don't even know what Joe lives at me No, I don't know either. I never seen Joe before in my life You still don't get it Tommy.  And this is where a bad boy hang out among other places He's got a name. It's run by a guy named Joe He minds his own business as far as we know, but his customers don't so all clicked when I remembered you said the guy The frog voice asked you if you came up there from Joe's place He didn't mean where Joe lived or anything. He meant this place. He thought maybe you were one of the boys Yeah, but how did I ever meet this Joe? I've never been here in my life runs another joint a respectable saloon the sort of cover about three blocks From our house the town tavern That's right remember Joe may or may not be in on this Frog voice made a big play to you that he didn't know Joe never seen him before in his life His customers always cover him it's better for them that way If my hunch is right Joe is going to be plenty surprised when he sees you walk in there me walk in there How don't worry walk in and sit down at the bar. You're not out in a couple of minutes I'll I'll know you recognize the guy. We're on the right track. I'll come in as though I didn't see you and go into the phone booth and then what and we'll see Okay kid. Okay. Oh one thing. Yeah, he offers you a drink on the house take it sure Well, here goes Here well, we got some it doesn't matter do it yourself Well, what do you know tell me? Hi, Joe. Hey, what are you doing down in this part of town kid? Oh, I I Had to come down to see a guy. I didn't know you had this place.  I know one fear. That'll be 10 10 Hey, no, no none of that you got to have one on me kid a real drink What do you have? Well, I got you Okay, Scotch for the gentleman Larry the very best you understand. Oh, yeah I'll take right Hey, Tommy, that was some party last night, huh? But yeah, hey, where'd you disappear to? I was looking all over for you.  I don't even remember I Get it. Well, the guy has to cut loose once in a while, huh? Yeah, one scotch the very best one right Well, here's to you wait a minute. Hey, who are you? This is my brother-in-law Then he this is Joe. Hey, you must have got those drinks mixed up. You never drink scotch Tommy. You only drink rye Yeah, that's right. Yeah, you take the rye and give Joe the scotch and I'll take your beer I don't like scotch another touch it. Okay, I'll take it Thanks, by the way, Joe, you haven't got a little bottle. I could pour this into have you say who do you think you're kidding, bud I'm from headquarters. There's my badge. Oh, oh now wait a minute. I didn't know that you I suppose You don't know what I'd find in this drink if I took it down to be analyzed either and now look I don't want any trouble. I never had any they can tell you down at headquarters Of course, it's a matter of dough. You can't buy your way out of this one chum I won't talk and I want it quick. What kind of talk? Where'd you take Tommy last night? It was just a little party a private party Yeah, and they slip things in people's drinks there, too No, I don't know anything about that now honest I hardly know the people who's the guy with the frog voice voice. I don't know any guy with a frog voice now Look, I told you I don't want any trouble. They could tell you that down at headquarters Listen, there's a narcotics rap in this for somebody and it could be you. Where was the party? Courtney square West number 75 some people named sir. Well, come on Tommy.  I Well, this is it it better be Mrs. Sorrell, yes, I'm from police headquarters. Oh, why don't we come and look around? I know come on Tommy you too Joe by the way, you two know each other Space familiar. I think he's been here on a couple of parties We kind of get crazy parties all kinds of people wander in and out That was the trouble it might be you know anyone with a froggy voice. No, not that I can remember Okay, let's look at the apartment. Well, this is the hall, of course and here's the living room Joe You stay here in the hall and you better be here when I get back. I'll be here So this is the living room This is the bedroom. It's kind of messy now. See anything. No Over here the kitchenette. I see that's about all there is to it. What's that room there? Oh, that's just the sort of storeroom. Yeah, well, I think we better look at it though. Come on. All right There see nothing much in it no alarm chair and a bit we use it as a guest room sometime can eat that closet Oh, there's nothing in there. A lot of old odds and ends open it. Well All right unlock it. I'm not sure where the key is and lady a better find it Be right back This is it Tommy. Oh, it was a closet like that and a window just over there where that one is and the armchair and the bed Don't you remember? Can't any let me have that key. Wait a minute. Here she comes. I think this is it. Try it Sort of stick sometimes. I'll help you See that's a lot of old junk. Uh-huh. Oh, come on. They sure sure. I'm sure come Well, I guess that's all mr. Sorrell. Thanks for showing us around Hello Joe still here, huh? You don't mind if I stay here and vision a while. Do you know I guess not well? Bye. Bye. Thanks again I'm sorry, Denny. Yeah, that was a try What do we do now? I don't know Tommy. I don't know Think Tommy think you found Joe. Now. What about those singing walls? Yeah, this is what that's it the singing walls the music I heard last night. You sure sure I remember the piece the harmonic on everything coming from right around here someplace any it's coming from there apart and the one We just left Sorrell. Well, come on This must be the place Tommy the closet now the music.  I told you I don't know anything about this But if you where's the music coming from the radio the radio, yes, I turned it on the kitchen just now when I started to fix dinner a little portable Okay Skip it Tommy here we go again. I don't care. That was the music I heard and that's the same number and it sounds like the same band Hey, wait a minute now what where's your phone on the desk? Tommy see what station that's coming over all right WBTA the local station. Thanks Hello operator get me station WBTA a radio station. I don't know what the number is just get it. This is a police call Thanks Maybe wrong Tommy, but I got a hunch Hello WBTA what's that band you've got on now? I Don't care if it's an electrical transcription or a Mickey Mouse cartoon. What's the guy's name? What turn off that radio? Now what was that guy's name? Yeah Mm-hmm. Oh Where can we get a hold of this guy? Where does he hang out? I see Five nights a week, huh? That include tonight Thanks The small-time band leader Tom my money can have on his harmonious He calls himself and he plays at a place called the silver slipper out in the concourse come on coming You better get on that phone Joe. Yeah, dumb you would have to turn on that radio There's a silver slipper right over there. Okay. Let us out here right There you are Thank you, sir. Look familiar to you around here. Tommy. No. Oh, I'm afraid it's a bum steer then he look kid Here's the way I figure this music deal you may have heard a recording of this band the way you did a little while ago But there's a good chance you actually heard the guy himself You know what time it was when you heard it? Well, it was just night. That's all I know. All right They don't make recordings off and I've unknown bands and this silver slipper isn't on the air So maybe you're out here someplace and heard the band itself. Maybe I Know it's kind of a long shot kid, but right now. It's the best we got. Let's case the joint Look like there are any rooms with closets and a silver slipper say what about that crummy-looking hotel next to it Yeah, I was just thinking If you're in a room in the closet and all that and you really did hear this band that hotels The only place you could have been I wish I could remember something shape you were in you probably signed your own name, too Come on By the way, what time you got? 10-6 10-6 Deadline is pretty close kid. Yeah, this better be right What Now there's a click we'll see Hey, you got a guy named Tom Cochran here Tom Cochran. I don't know. It's all right. We're friends of his see when they register last night So here it is Tom Cochran and Ben Doyle room 209. I don't think they're in now. No, no I've been ringing me see if they're gonna check up by six. I was just gonna send somebody up Well, they were out a big party last night probably haven't pulled themselves together yet Matter of fact, that's where we came to see him. Should I ring again? No, we'll sort of surprise. Okay, right up those stairs But they gotta be up by six or pay for another night. We'll take care of that. Let's go Tom Denny Did you see that hand running on the register? Yeah It was mine all right. This is it Tommy one way or another. Yeah, here's 209 Don't put your hand on that doorknob. Oh fingerprints. Use your handkerchief It's locked. I got some keys It's an easy lock There we go kid Then he this is it close that door Yeah, there's a closet. Give me the key Yeah, you better hold my gun on that door just in case all right Then he look out He was just falling he's dead. Oh Oh Gee, this is all you remember now Yeah, I Can't put it together. Let's have a look. Oh That Here's his driver's license. Benjamin Doyle Give me it Hello Oh, yeah, we found them. All right. No, they're gonna keep the room for another night. No, no, no There's not a thing we want We're in for it now kid Let me look on the floor over there last night covered with blood That's what did it. All right. Yeah. Hey Yeah, I know it's mine Tommy. Why didn't you tell me honest Danny? I didn't even know I'd lost until I just saw it then now fingerprints all over as clear as though They've been made in ceiling wax Right-handed aren't you Tommy? Yeah, right hand. Let me see your right hand Doesn't take an expert to read these those prints are yours. All right kid.  I don't and you think of any other explanation. No, there's a guy with the frog voice, but I Must have just dreamed him up. I don't know Okay, I guess this is it You did all you could then he don't feel bad. You can plead insanity or something maybe we can prove you were doped maybe You better call headquarters Danny, let's get it over. All right Hey, where are you going? I don't know from here the clerk will listen in No, you's getting all the wolves on us before we have to aren't you afraid that I'll no no I won't I Just haven't sent a detective car. You won't have to go in a wagon. Thanks Better let me have my gun. Sure. I'll be back. I don't for a couple of minutes You look kind of sick. I am That's the idea take a little snooze. I won't be gone long Get a little sleep. Do you good? I'll be right back Have a little trouble in here Sure All over your shirt. Oh, he's all right. Put him in the closet lock that door He right in your pocket. I'm not going any place back in just a minute Sure, I'll be right back You yeah me hey, what are you gonna do with him froggy get him in the other room until he's copper friend misses him and starts looking I listen. I don't want to be in anything like this.  You're in it up to your neck. Come on. You get up Okay, get going Up the hall here open the other door Joe sure Get in that's the guy from yeah, listen froggy. Just don't look so good There was people who knew you were getting ready to give it to Doyle. I'm sure sure that's why I framed this guy Oh the trouble I went to dope them and brought Doyle in there what he was out planted the key on and bloodied them up with a knife And he's in I still don't see how he how he ever come to in time. Yeah, but he did so what? We frame him again music you like music. Don't you you're pretty sweet about music, ain't you Well for your information that's harmonica hair rehearsing for tonight and in this room It comes through the window on a counter the reservoir But in the other room it comes through the walls on a counter the rate no window catch on better close the window Joe No, no wait a minute Yeah, I do like music You mind if a guy in the spot like I am here's a little music. What about it? Sure sure leave it up and let's have music while we work It'll cover up the noise if he makes any fuss.  He's drunk see and we're taking him. Okay Run him back. Nobody else see us going out that way. All right. All right. You ready just a minute All right, take a look. Okay. All right. Take a look at the door. Okay All clear Yeah, let's go Lock the door after we go on okay Down the hall at the back stairs Hey, what From you guys, I gotta find out grassy Annie you get that gag out of the guy's mouth and untie him Mike sure Denny I heard the music. I Hope you would I asked him to leave the window. I heard the conversation too now Okay boys take them down. All right. Come on. Come on say Who are those guys? Asian is a mobster Doyle was one of his boys who double-crossed him. I Feel okay. I guess that was kind of close. Yeah all the way around. Yeah Look kid. I skip it any I'm sorry Tommy honest I thought you did it any until just now so did I And so closes the singing walls starring Preston Foster with Dane Clark tonight's tale of Suspends This is your narrator the man in black who conveys to you Columbia's invitation to spend this half hour in suspense with us again Next week at this same time when Miss Lillian Gish and Mr. Otto Krueger will star in the suspense play Marry for murder The producer of these broadcasts William Spear who would Ted Bliss the director Bernard Herman and Lucy and Marowick conductor and composer and Robert L. Richards the radio author collaborated on tonight's suspense This is CBS the Columbia broadcasting system


QuickBooks Online 2022. Bank feeds credit card data setup. Get ready because it's go time with QuickBooks Online 2022. Here we are in our bank feed practice file we set up with a 30-day free trial holding down control, scrolling up a bit to get to the one to five percent currently in the home page otherwise known as the get things done page. In the business view as compared to the accounting view switching to the accounting view is something you can do by going to the cog up top switch to the accounting view down below. We will be going back and forth between the two views either here or by jumping to the sample company file currently in the accounting view. Going on back to the bank feed practice file opening up some tabs to put reports in by right clicking on the tab up top duplicating it back to the tab to the left right clicking again and duplicating again. As these are thinking let's jump on over to the sample company currently in the accounting view to see where the reports are located which is on the left hand side under reports. Going back on over to the business view in the bank feed practice file second tab reports here located under the business overview and then reports closing the hamburger going into the balance sheet one of our favorite reports the financial statement report we do it every time every time 0 1 0 1 2 1 2 12 31 2 1 being our range and we're gonna run it running the range going back up top second tab on to the right we're gonna go to the bay business overview again reports closing the hamburger going down to the profit and loss that we do every single time every time with this report 0 1 0 1 2 1 12 31 2 1 on the range change run it and then we're gonna go back to the first tab you'll recall in prior presentations we set up the bank feed information for the checking account now we want to do the same thing for the credit card information if we go down to the bookkeeping area down below and then into the transactions tab we see our information from the checking account stuff that we pulled in from the bank which if you were in the accounting view by the way would be under the banking information on the left hand side and then under the banking tab so what we would like to do now is pulling the credit card information which is something that a lot of people kind of overlook when they first think about the bank feeds because they think that it would be the checking account kind of information that they're going to be pulling in but the financial institutions are the same financial institutions in essence or similar financial institutions for the credit card side of things and you have a very similar type of transaction for the credit cards in that you're usually purchasing things for the business or on the personal you could do it on the personal side as well that are going to be basically like expenses you could be doing the same kind of thing utility bill telephone bill you're paying with a credit card but instead of increasing or instead of decreasing the checking account as you make those payments you're going to be increasing a liability which you will then pay off at a future time the other reason it's nice to do the credit card and think about the credit card is because it is common for us to have multiple accounts now that have bank feeds related to them and we want to think about those transactions that are going to go from one to the other in other words paying off the credit card from the checking account is going to be a decrease to the checking account and it's also going to have an impact on the credit card and those are two transactions that have bank feeds in them now so we want to practice those interbank feed type of transactions on that and see how those things will work out as well now the process of setting the setting this up will be much the same we can go up top in this section and say I want to link an account this is one way that you could do it also note that you do need to have a credit card account type that's going to be set up which you can create as you do the link or you can go into the hamburger up top we can go into the chart of accounts which is in the bookkeeping which we're already in and then look at the chart of accounts which is on the left hand side chart of accounts and then you can create a new account that needs to be a credit card type of account I won't do it here but you could do this process first let's just look at it if I was to say new I'm in the business view so I don't see the same credit card categories but the type of account in other words which would be these items on this type area would be a credit card type of account when you create either a credit card type or a checking account you have the option indicated by this little sign right here that has the bank feed kind of data information for it so it will most likely ask you about the feeds or we can set that account up as we enter the bank feeds by going back into the hamburger the bookkeeping area transactions and I'm gonna say I'm gonna add it in this format so then if we're gonna link directly to the bank feeds we can use the link and if you're gonna be uploading the data those are the two formats that you could use for the data just like with the checking account so if I went to the link here I could say I've got my link that we're going to be using then you can search for your banking information so if it was like American Express for example you gonna find American American Express for the credit card information in that format and then you have to go through the linking process just like you would with the bank which might be different from financial institution to financial institution but usually it's a fairly easy process to get done if you have to contact the financial institutions in some cases possibly you might have to do that but usually you can get that done and follow the instructions to figure out how to get it done doing any verification process required by that financial institution that's not the difficult part the difficult part is once you get the data into the system to then to then deal with it in the same way we're doing with the checking account to add it into your financial statements now the second way that you could do this I'm gonna close this out is you could try to get the information from your financial institution directly instead of linking which could be important especially with the first time that you do this because you might be able to go further back so if you need to pull a lot of data for like two years or something that you want to input into the system then you might be able to go further back in time if you get the data directly from the institution once you have the data in the system you'll be in the same area in other words you'll be in this area where you got the data in the system that you got to then import it to the financial statements adding more information such as the accounts so you could then hit the drop-down up top if I want to import the data by going to the upload from file information and now you got kind of the side-by-side the manual upload on the left-hand side now I'm jumping over to a screenshot of like Wells Fargo just to give an idea of how you might go through the process of getting this information from your financial institution you'd go to your financial institution and generally they're gonna have some place that you can download the trans the transactions the detail of the transactions the file types that you're looking for will typically be the QuickBooks download which will download it as kind of a banking QuickBooks formatted download form or sheet or data file and that's the one that most likely will be easiest to upload into the system if they don't have that the second one that's probably most likely going to work for you and is the general one that an institution if they don't have QuickBooks which many of them do at this point would have which is just a spreadsheet type of format not formatted like Excel but just a spreadsheet which might be a .csv type of file when you download it don't get confused from the QuickBooks file to the quick end file quick end is different than QuickBooks they're now not owned by the same company even I don't believe at this point in time which is into it so don't get those two mixed up now once you download the file you can have something like this this one you can see it says it's a QBO file so that's the banking term to say it's a credit card type of file that we can then upload into the QuickBooks system and possibly set up a new account as we do that so I'm gonna go back on over and say okay we're gonna upload it here let's select the file or you can drag and drop it into this area also just realize that you got this at these other kind of file types so the QBO is probably the most common then the .csv but they do have the .qfx the .ofx and the txt that may be applicable as well so I'm gonna go to the desktop I'm gonna try to find that file here's the credit card file I'm gonna open it up bring it in and so there we got it so I'm gonna say continue continue on and then we've got the information on the left-hand side we have to choose an account now I hadn't set up like an account yet so I'm gonna add another account as we go I'm gonna say I'm gonna add an account and now I get the drop down that you usually see in the accountant view instead of that weirdness on the business view and I can set it up it's got to be a credit card type of account so it'll allow the bank feeds not a bank type of account because it's a credit card here you want on the liability side of things it's gonna be a credit card then you can name it whatever credit cards you want you might want to put like the last four digits of the credit card or something like that most likely naming it by the the actual financial institution like American Express Visa or whatever capital whatever that is the credit card and you also might want to put like a master credit card account or a parent account and then put the other accounts Visa Mastercard you know American Express or whatever as sub accounts under it so that on the financial statement you can collapse it into one credit card type of account and expand it giving you the detail for the multiple credit card accounts within those are just some options for the formatting options I'm gonna go ahead and save it then let's save it to that account it's gonna make that account it's gonna tie some bank feeds to it hopefully the accounts you selected are different than what you select during the previous upload credit card do you want to continue I'm gonna say yes because I want to select another account so I'm gonna say continue import complete you're in control of how your bank info goes into QuickBooks transfer only show up to your books after you review and accept them so in other words it's gonna put them into what I call bank feed limbo so now I've got two tags up top I've got the checking account tag and I've got the credit account credit card tag and I've got you know the 71 transactions I'll go I'll go through a few of them and take a look at them but that's gonna be the general idea between these two tabs so now if I went into the I'm gonna go back to the checking account but if I go into the credit cards it's gonna be the same kind of information with just basically the detail down here it's in bank feed limbo meaning it hasn't been pulled into the actual creation or the supporting of the creation of the financial statements yet it needs some help needs a little bit of love needs a little bit more information what is that information what is that guidance we got to put in there same thing as with the checking account we've got to add to it at least the account that needs to be impacted possibly a credit card possibly expense type of account utilities telephone and so on and most likely vendors the person that we are paying to give us a little bit more detail about them and then we'll also take a look at those inter bank feed transactions for when we paid off the credit card most likely from a transaction that came out of the checking account that we should see on both sides of these two bank feeds we'll get into that more in future presentations


What is going on guys welcome back to the channel and I appreciate you being here today I've been in this destined to top five super plays of the week Remember people if you do enjoy the video leaving a like really does help me and my channel out And if you have any amazing clip to send in send it into the email address linked within the top of the video description But let's get straight into this top five in at number five We have a clip sent in by KennyLJ92 with this insane noble bomb We have a clip sent in by Toxic for the win one of many great hammer clips featured today this dude absolutely wrecks Number three we have a clip sent in by Gabriel Oliver again hammers for days In at number two we have a clip sent in by Mr. Silver 2001 what I like to see a fellow hunter tearing the house down We have a clip sent in by JCFX boss well because pvp is now 4v4 Bungie I guess didn't think someone would ever get what would have been a seventh column how wrong were they But guys that is the end this top five super plays of the week If you enjoyed the video leaving a like really does help me out If you have any amazing clip to send in send it into the email address linked within the top of the video description But hopefully people I will see you on that next one


After a nine and a half month deployment, the USS Carl Vinson Strike Group is headed home. During the deployment, Vinson supported strike operations in Iraq and Syria, flew more than 2,300 combat missions, and dropped more than half a million pounds of ordinance in the fight against ISIS. Researchers and scientists at the Defense POW-MIA Accounting Agency now have a brand new billing that will centralize their efforts to identify lost service members. The new multi-million dollar facility located on joint base Pearl Harbor, Hickam, Hawaii is the largest forensic anthropology lab in the world. And finally, USS Sampson recently returned home from an independent deployment to the western Pacific Ocean. While deployed, Sampson-Salish conducted operations with the Japan Maritime Self Defense Force and participated in several community relations events, totally more than 500 hours. For these stories and more, visit navy.no.


Okay, welcome back to Senate Education Tuesday, Wednesday, May 5th, 232. We are now shifting gears on H106. But senators, I did ask Becky Wasserman to do a draft amendment on H426 that I will ask Jeanie to send to you to look at. Some of us may have time, some of us may gather tomorrow morning at nine, but those who cannot be here, I believe our colleagues from transportation, it'd be great for you to have a look at it. I realize that we're still waiting for information, but in short, what it does is it says schools need to do this testing by January 2023. We do have Mr. Nichols here. I spoke to Mr. Nichols during the break and I'm gonna have him weigh in on this also at some point before the end of today's work. Okay, let's get going with H106. Mr. Fisher, thank you for joining us. Committee members will recall that we had asked Mr. Fisher to speak with his colleagues about 106 as it relates to getting the agricultural markets up and running. And we know that there's $500,000 traveling in the budget. And as I recall, 60,000 of that was set aside to support the agency's work in getting that those markets going. And we had, believe it was the Committee on Agriculture as well as this committee had heard from Ms. Rosie Kruger that the $60,000 would work to sort of advance these. But Mr. Fisher felt and rightfully so, it warranted a check-in with Ms. Kruger not being around this week to see where the agency is landing on this issue. So, Mr. Fisher, if I'm leaving anything out on what your assignment was, please let us know and also let us know what you found out, floor is yours. Thank you. Good afternoon for the record, Ted Fisher, Director of Communications and Legislative Affairs for the Ramon Agency of Education. Very glad to join you all again on another rainy afternoon. So I just, I wanted to, I appreciate the introduction, Senator, Mr. Chair. I just did want to note that as part of the conversations ongoing, we, the Director Kruger has been very clear that there will be ongoing staff support needed for this. This was one aspect of a larger position. So my lack of clarity yesterday was whether or not we could, by focusing on one aspect, get by without an additional position. So after checking in internally and speaking to Secretary of French, he feels that this team is, has been doing really excellent work since the beginning of the pandemic and has been short, sort of at the low end of capacity for the work that they're being asked to do. And then we expect that not only do we expect this program and I know that there is intent on both houses and we share that intent to make universal meals a permanent situation in the out years. We feel that the position is therefore necessary to make this policy program, excuse me, workable. So Mr. Chair, some language was shared with me in advance and I see that it's in the most up-to-date version of the bill. Would you like me to speak to that immediately or wait for questions? Well, let's start with just getting a better understanding of where we're at. And by that, I mean, we're looking at this right now. This is, we're talking about the $500,000 is a one-time, one-year appropriation, as I understand it. And so I think that is where maybe, and I don't want to speak for Ms. Krueger, but the $60,000 coming off of that was again, looking at a one, to get this going for one year. And you're saying, no, no, we want, what do you want to get this going for a one-year period? What would satisfy the agency of education? I might ask to phone a friend in Jim, but my understanding is that this is an ongoing program. If that's been changed in the most recent bill, my understanding is that we were being asked to stand up a new local foods incentive grant program both this year and in the out years. So that would be why, that would be why we want to get it established with the position. Yeah, I completely agree that that's what we're doing, but I thought we were kind of looking at this as just, and again, I could be completely wrong, sort of getting it going. So, but we're hearing that right now, the agency of education wants or believes in needs, you know, a full-time position. So what would that look like to you? What dollar amount would have you all kind of satisfied that you can get a person and get this work up and going? Understood, and I really, again, I apologize for saying that I'm not 100% certain, but the gym has inserted a provision section eight on page 21, which has a dollar amount of $100,000 for salary benefits and operating expenses for this position. My understanding is that comes from a previous version of S100, and I'll just note that when we talk about sort of these sort of positions, there's two numbers that the agency tends to use, one is $100,000 and one is $125,000. Okay. I'm not an expert on the budget side of the house, but I believe that that has to do with the pay grade that we're budgeting for. So my understanding, and again, with no way to confirm unfortunately, is that this was language that was, I actually know that Rosie can make it work with this. I'm not exactly sure what it will translate to on our end in terms of the hiring and establishment of the position, but I'm going to say that for our purposes today that this number is sufficient. Mr. Demeray, would you remind us? Thank you, Mr. Fisher for that. Mr. Demeray, so you, the genesis of this language is? S100, as passed by the Senate, has the language in it, but it doesn't take effect until next year. So I just took the language from that and put it into this bill. And if S100 moves forward, we have to strip out that provision in S100 because you know it twice, obviously, and see if it goes. Okay, I apologize for my own confusion here. So Mr. Demeray, point us to the page that you have done this. So we have it, I'm looking at 106, draft 5.2. Yup, it is, I'm sorry, Ted, you had the page, all right? Yep. Ted? Oh, Ted. My draft in front of me. Yes, and I had just actually scrolled up from it. It is page 21. Okay. This is the last section before the task force on universal school lunch. Okay, so here's page 21, the task force for universe. Okay, so are we start, where does it start and finish on page 21? There's a lot of changes on mine. It's just lines 10 through 17. Perfect, okay. So one full-time classified position, $100,000 salary. So Jim, is this taken out of the $500,000? That might be. No. Okay. So in S-100, you had this language. You have this language now, dental language. Okay. I'm just copying and putting it here because the other goes into effect for another year. Right, so I just want to make sure for an ideal apologize for my confusion. So this is not something, this is already in the big bill, this $100,000. Nope, the $500,000 for the program itself is in the big bill. Okay. Okay, the separate piece for this position is not in the big bill, it's in S-100. But S-100 being taken effect in July of next year, the timing doesn't work, so it's being put into this bill so that it would be available sooner. So, which all makes sense, but how do we make a budgetary change on this date at this time? Without taking from the $500,000. Well, you have to go through appropriations that were imagined outside of this position. Yeah, no, I understand that I just don't see and perhaps I look to our most senior member center lines at this stage in the game, but the house having the budget, the only thing that the Senate's position has already been represented. In other words, without this in it, committees of conference don't put new things in there. So the only way I see this going is with $100,000 if it's taken out of the $500,000 that's already in the budget. Does that make sense? Center lines, please. Well, I mean, it does make sense, but there's nothing that would disallow for the additional funds. I mean, the money is increasing and decreasing in the appropriations conference committee process. The issue is the position. The position is not there. That also has to be negotiated. So I think a conversation with Senate appropriations would probably be in order on this or the funding is left in. I mean, this would be post-conversation. If the funding is left in, then it has to come from the Ed fund or some other one-time monies. If it's a single year appropriation. Yeah, so the expectation, and I'm looking to Mr. DeMarie, that it wouldn't be a single year appropriation and that we're setting this up, this position up. It could be a three-year position if there are temporary three-year dollars available, ARPA funds. So I think that's a really good conversation to have with Senator Kitchell. Yeah, I think you're right. And I think, but it's good to know from Mr. Fisher that this is what it would cost the agency. Jim, is there, because we're looking at food, nutrition, are ESSER set aside funds available for this? In other words, no, they're not, okay. Not because of ESSER or so much as other federal law prohibits funding, I believe that's been confirmed by Rosie. This appropriation is from fiscal 2022 and the ongoing years is you include this in now and it's in our budget going forward. Okay. So it would be dealt with going forward. Okay. Questions for either Mr. DeMarie or Mr. Fisher at this point. Appreciate the clarity in the back and forth. I certainly understand a little bit better on how at least next steps, which mean as Senator Lines pointed out, a conversation with a prox and see what they have to say. I mean, they know that we're working on this language and that this language that they felt as though this is where the most appropriate spot would be on it for this issue to be handled. So I will contact Senator Kitchell. I mean, so let's just talk worst case scenarios here. Could we, if we needed to, could we say take the 100,000 out of the 500,000 for this one year to get this up and going, Jim? I think that's a question for, for you. It's really a question of how you want to spend the money, I guess, yeah. But I mean, certainly we could, from your standpoint, we could draft, we could draft whatever we want you're saying. We want it to be 100,000. If you took the 100,000 out of the 500,000, what does that do to the program? Yeah, no, it's a good question. What does it do to the program itself? Yeah. That would be kind of a last one. It might not be, it might not be enough. But we were about to take the 60,000 out of the 500, Jim. 60,000 was going to be, good question, how that was draft originally. I believe that it's coming out of the 500,000. And that 60,000 is not in this draft. So this draft only has the position, not the additional 60,000 for a contractor. Senator Hooker. So in the original S-100, the language was for a two-year limited position. So how does that factor into this? I don't recall being in the mid-two-year position in the original S-100. I have to go back and trace that. The draft's been through many iterations over time, so.  So when you talk about ongoing funds, you know, how does that differ from, or what does that mean with regard to what we had initially intended? Well, it was, sorry. No, no, please go ahead. Like I said, if it was a limited service position for two years, obviously it'd be a funding only for two years. So this version here has it funded ongoing, right? So there is a difference obviously in cost over time. I'll check S-100 as it reduces to see what it said right now. Through you, Mr. Chair, Senator Hooker, I don't know without checking back through the various versions to see which one it is. But I do know that Rosie worked with the Senate Committee on Agriculture for several weeks trading back iterations of drafts in order to get it to a place where it would be implementable on our side of the House. So that might be a change that came about as part of that. We are concerned that if we would need to sustain this program over years that we have the staffing and capacity to do so. So again, I apologize to be caveatting everything but my assumption is that that change was made during that process. I know that there was a couple of weeks of intensive work between her and your neighbors down the virtual hallway. Good to think to clarify, in S-100 as introduced by Senate Agriculture, this position was a permanent position. It was not two years, it was permanent. And secondly, out of the $500,000 appropriation in the as-induced version, 60,000 could be used to retain a contractor. Senator Hooker, I'm wondering if it's possible you're thinking we did a limited service position. There were a lot of conversations around that as it related to literacy. Literacy. And also I think even something else, but my instincts are we keep it as is and we take Senator Lyon's suggestion and we work with our colleagues down the hall to see if it is indeed possible to advance this as is, which would give, as Mr. Fisher requested, $100,000 appropriation to that position. Other questions or comments were either Mr. Fisher or Mr. Demeray. It might not feel like it, colleagues, but I think we are getting somewhere, we really are. I mean, this has been, I think, a heavy, but speaking for myself, a really important lift, not only for more nutritious meals, but also creating these local markets. And I can only speak for myself, but down here, young farmers, I think it's going to benefit immensely if we can continue with this direction. And so with that, Mr. Fisher, anything else from you or the agency? Please, I see that your hand is up. Perfect timing. Oh, no, I'll just say I really appreciate the opportunity to join you and I'm looking forward to joining you again in person, hopefully next year. So, but I would want to say I need to, I'm a poor vessel for this today because I was unfortunately out of the office this morning, but I think, Mr. Chair, that Deputy Secretary Boucher has reached out to you or to Jeannie about some of the other provisions, the community schools provisions of this. I think she has some additional concerns or feedback to share with you. So I just wanted to note that, unfortunately I don't have the specifics I've been sort of trying over the past hour to see what exactly they are, but I don't have them at this moment. So I just wanted to note that for you. Did you say concerns and or compliments or just concerns? I think I know that she's worked very hard with you. I'm sure that she has some feedback. I think she has some feedback. So Dr. Boucher has been an incredible partner in this and I owe her a phone call and I did see an email from her and please, if you do talk to her, apologies for not getting back to her yet, but I will have a conversation with her. And we will not move this forward without hearing from Dr. Boucher again. So great. I will pass that along and you folks have been doing a lot of work. So I appreciate the opportunity to join you. Well, thank you, Mr. Boucher. We know that you've been leading the, you've been managing so many different fronts as it relates to COVID in our school. So thank you for your work and thanks for pinch hitting, if you will, at this point. So I appreciate it. Hope you have a wonderful day. Thank you, Mr. Robinson. Good afternoon. Good afternoon. Great to see you. Good to see you all as well. We, as you know, I reached out to you and Mr. Nichols, great to see you as well. Mr. Nichols was following our work and was in touch with us about a language change which he emailed us last evening. And I know that it was, I believe it was a language change that you actually proposed, which led me to calling committee members, Mr. Robinson. And knowing that this committee, we want to get everybody on the same page working together. I have to thank Mr. Nichols and Mr. Robinson for taking the time out of their day to work together. I think we're getting closer to resolving this and making all parties, if not happy, satisfied, moving forward. So with that, I wonder if I may start with you, Mr. Robinson, if you would just bring us to the section that we are discussing and tell us what your thoughts are. Yes. If that works best for you, if not... Absolutely. Yeah, let me just find it in the draft that everybody was just had open. So this is specifically related to the definition of the site-based leadership team that Jay spoke to yesterday and... And senators, if you'll just take a look, it's on page nine, section five. Correct. Yeah. Yes, yes. So I provide, I emailed you all some comments this morning recognizing what Jay spoke to yesterday around and trying to make sure that this doesn't become duplicative or overly burdensome. Obviously, we provided testimony, Vermont A provided testimony earlier about the importance of this to the integrity of the work. So Jay and I had some back and forth, a good conversation. And basically what you will see with some caveats that Jay and I will speak to in a minute or I'll probably pass it to Jay to speak to specifically is that there's language in there that says the site-based leadership may include the then enumerated parties, right? And then it makes it clear that they're sort of consulted in the process of supporting the program, right? The original language that Jay and I came to agreement on and shared with Jim had a different sort of clause at the end there that I will, if it's okay with you Senator Campion, I'd like to pass it, have Jay speak to that section and the import of that section to this. But what's exciting, I think here is that we're able to keep this language while also respecting and respecting the integrity of the program, the role of the site-based leadership team will also maintaining continuity of leadership inside our schools as well. Great, Mr. Nichols. Hi, Jay Nichols, Executive Director of VPA speaking on behalf of VSPA, VPA and VSA. So, yeah, Colin spoke to our concerns. We had a language that we both agreed on. I think, and Jim, please feel free to correct me. I think Jim was from a legal mastermind like he is, was worried about the word school district. And so I proposed some language afterwards that Colin agreed to that would say school districts, then a, you know, asked inside of a parentheses so that it could be plural and or supervisor unions and so that it could be plural. In Title 16, many places we have school districts, supervisor unions being used interchangeable all the time. We just wanna make it clear that the school district or the supervisor union is a governing authority over whatever goes on. That's our only intent here. So we think the language that we agreed on with Vermont and the A earlier today is in terms of the field understanding is the best language that we could use or something similar to that. Mr. Demerick, any comments from you? Yeah, that's fine. It's a little clunky just for us that way. But the reason I raised the issue is in this draft based on your testimony yesterday, you wanted to expand the L's for recipient definition to be school district or two more school districts working together or two more students working together. So who the recipient is could be a variety of combinations. So referring to a school district didn't really make sense in terms of how it's been framed. We can add in references to all that stuff or maybe we can use the definition of L's for recipient instead here if that would be okay. That works for me. I'm looking to Mr. Nichols and Mr. Robinson. Yeah, that would work for me too. I think it's more clunky to have by the community school coordinator and makes it like that role has more authority than it really would. So I'm fine with Jim's suggestion. Colin, how about you? Yeah, we'd be comfortable with that. And I think it clearly points to the enumerated eligible recipients. Right, right. Committee, I'm seeing committee members nodding. Okay, great. I don't think there's any way I'm gonna be able to convince anyone to present this on the floor. So it's likely gonna be me. And I'm good with it. So, okay, great. Anything else, gentlemen, from either of you as we take yet even another step closer to passing universal or community schools with some center perspective, please. I'm assuming the answer is yes, just from the agreement on that language. But I assume both Colin and Jay were listening to the testimony yesterday about the kind of multi-district approach or that might not have the same kind of configuration of a coordinator. And just if you guys were supportive of the approach that was proposed yesterday by the people that provided testimony. Gentlemen, did you have an opportunity to follow yesterday's work? I only got to see a little bit of it. I got some phone calls from people who thought they were in crisis over wearing mask with sports. So I had a pretty busy afternoon dealing with that whole thing. But in terms of the flexibility piece, Senator Perslick, I think that's the key. Make it as flexible as possible. So schools have the entry point that makes the most sense for them. To preserve Secretary of the Agency of Natural Resources right. To waive it's right. Okay, well, we learned about A&R. That's right. I will say no problem. You know, Jim, I'm just always relieved when it's not me. So it really doesn't matter who it is or that it even happens. So please, no problem. Mr. Robinson. I'll have those moments. Thank you, Senator. So Senator Perslick, I did listen to that yesterday. We were comfortable with that notion. Obviously school districts collaborate on many things across many components of the work. And it makes sense to make sure that is not prohibited by the language in this. So I know just a broadly speaking, wanna thank the committee for digging into this. Important bill and exciting serve demonstration grant. Right. Anything else now as well, we are on 106 with Mr. Nichols and Mr. Robinson. We will certainly be hearing again from Dr. Boucher and we'll also be looking at final language. But anything else on this before we shift again to back to 426 while Mr. Nichols is here? Okay. Mr. Robinson, thanks a million. Good to see everybody. I'll stick around to listen. Okay, great, great. Let's see, Mr. Nichols, thanks so much. Really appreciate you jumping in on this issue at the last minute. Senators know that I may have already mentioned this, but I did reach out to Mr. Nichols around lunchtime about us moving in the direction with an amendment that would require schools to test for radon and asked him if you'd be so kind to carve out some time and talk to his colleagues, Ms. Siglowski and Mr. Fan, or not Mr. Fan and Mr. Francis, which he's had an opportunity to do. And let us know where that group of individuals is on this particular issue at this point. So if you don't mind Mr. Nichols, the floor is yours and we welcome your thoughts. Great, thank you. So specifically to radon testing, the three executive directors had a conversation and we basically have all made statements in the past around unfunded mandates and I know all of you know that. So that's something that we feel that we have to be consistent about. Even if we think that the program is a valid program and obviously we think this is something that's valid and we appreciate you're looking into it, the safety of our students and our staff members is paramount to all of us. So our big issue with it would be around unfunded mandate. And for us, we've tried to be consistent if the unfunded mandate was on menstrual products, which I testified in favor of and supported, I did put in my testimony, it was unfunded mandate even though we think it's a great program. And it's something regardless of the amount of money that's involved, we wanna keep putting out there. Several years ago, secretary, actually commissioner, Hocom at the time, did a report where she showed how much money was being spent in school budgets that really maybe shouldn't have been in school budgets and she came up with a figure like 76% of the school budget stuff was school, really school connected. And a lot of the rest was mental health or health services or something that really probably should not be necessarily considered an education fund. And when you do that, you're constantly showing your education fund going up and people keep saying how much money we're spending. And we just wanna make it clear that a lot of that money is not spent on academics or traditional schooling for students the way that it is in other states, which drives up the per pupil cost. So we just have to keep mentioning that. The other big point here and I wanna be really clear on this is the Vermont School Board Association actually has a resolution that their membership signed on to saying that they would not support any unfunded mandates. So their organization is in a position where they have to, on any issue, have to state that.  Do we think rate on testing is important? Absolutely. Is it gonna be really expensive? It doesn't sound like the testing itself is gonna be really expensive. Can we pay for it out of S or three funds? That remains to be seen. And then the other point of this whole thing is if there are mitigation issues, if at school, at any town elementary school, we find there's a mitigation situation, who's gonna pay for that cost? And obviously we would be pushing that it's a public health concern and should be paid for at the state level. I think that's pretty much it, Senator Campion. Subject, any questions, anybody in mind? That was terrific, very helpful. And as we've been talking, Mr. Nichols, and you probably have heard us, I think number one, we feel without a doubt we can't keep kicking this can down the road. There are teachers, children, staff that need to know the status of the buildings that they're working in. I may be exaggerating here, but I think if this were a private industry situation and an employee was concerned and for something was found, absolutely it would be a big deal. And we need to take this as seriously as we possibly can. I completely understand where you're coming from with regard to an unfunded mandate. I'll just say, and I think, I mean, you know this, I think you would agree with this, we would be delighted to hear back from the federal agency of education that these ESSER funds can indeed be used for testing for radon. That would be the ideal situation. Less ideal might be, what we're talking about is having schools and school districts do this work recognizing that with their ESSER funds, they may have out there projects that they had in some ways budgeted for, but now they have ESSER funds and in some ways they're giving some relief to some perhaps budgetary issues that now they might have a few extra $1,000 to do the testing. The other side of this that I've been thinking about a lot, I know the committee's been talking about a lot is, you know, we just keep hearing that the Biden administration and Congress is going to be coming down with what we hope is a strong infrastructure bill and getting us ready for that is key. And to me, that's why all these things are coming together and the timing seems like this is the right time to do it. But I completely appreciate your very thoughtful comments and certainly realized and know that you are as committed to student and staff health, that health as we are. Committee, any questions or comments for Mr. Nichols at this point? Please, Senator. Just a comment that as we were talking about the elimination of radon, should it be found in testing? And testing is a lot less expensive, as you said, that the whole issue around HVAC improvement and replacement will also go toward radon, could go toward radon elimination. So it might be a two-factor, not a trifecta, but we could do two things at once. We don't wanna kill birds, so I won't say it. But so there is an opportunity here. It's not, I don't think any of us like unfunded mandates, but seeing how less expensive it is to test and then maybe there's some serendipity out there with infrastructure funds might be able to accomplish some elimination of radon. So we're just keeping our fingers crossed. Yeah, great. Mr. Nichols, I'm sure this is not gonna be goodbye. So this is, we still have a couple of weeks, but thank you for coming in and thanks for always being at the end of the phone. And we may see you again as early as tomorrow or four o'clock this afternoon. Don't hesitate. Thank you. We really appreciate it. Thanks. Very grateful, thank you. Okay, committee, I will ask Jeannie to share the edited version of that amendment. One thing I want to be perfectly clear on is, and I mean this, if anybody ever wants a different order in terms of names on amendments in any way, you just let me know.  How did you know this, what I've been doing? Well, I saw some kind of go fund me thing just pop up to replace me. But listen, at this point, we'll just go with it. Okay, so I think Jeannie will send that along for everybody to review. We have Michelle Childs coming in at 3.30. So again, I apologize for the clunkiness, but we do want to start this work with Ms. Childs and she's going to be the one to take us through and give us the background on H183, which is again the sexual violence bill that we're working on for this year.