From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is a CUBE Conversation. Hi, I'm Stu Miniman and welcome to a CUBE Conversation. I'm coming to you from the CUBE's East Coast Studio offices and joining me is one of our CUBE alums from the earliest CUBE event that we ever did. He's also one of our guest hosts, longtime friend of the program, someone I've known for a long time. John Troyer, the chief Reckoner at Tech Reckoning. John, so good to see you. Thanks so much for joining us. Hey, Stu, thanks for having me on. Dialing in here from sunny Half Moon Bay, California. All right, well, John, first of all, it's been good to talk to you a bunch. Normally we would be seeing you at a number of the conferences of course with today's global pandemic. It stopped us seeing in person, but I tell you, a month ago, you held the influencer marketing council and it was one of those weeks where it was just kind of everything's changing, the world is upside down and it was just so nice to talk to, so many of our peers in the community, the people that we've known for a long time, and just commiserate a little bit at first and then all share as to how we're moving forward and what we're doing. So bring us up to speed as to what you're seeing out there in the community. Sure, sure. Well, Stu, I mean, that's one of the ironies of the place we're at here, right? We're learning that connection is so important. We know it is, but we tend to lump it in together with conferences and with sales calls and seminars, webinars, and we're learning that this kind of connection, these relationships are what we as humans are built on and also what business is built on, business is built of relationships. So I work a lot with companies doing, work with their practitioner communities, with advocacy, customer advocacy, partner advocacy, with influencers outside their ecosystem, these kind of relationship-based ways to get attention and ways to fill the funnel. And they've really kind of been both pulled apart and put center stage on this current, with our current pandemic. Yeah, it's interesting, because you think about like, what was online before and there in a lot of communities?  So is there anything you've seen that's drastically changed, obviously from an event standpoint, we'll spend some time talking about virtual events and the like, but influencer groups, the kind of Vexperts and MVPs of the world, has there been any immediate impact on those groups? Well, sure, I mean, a lot of times there are, like you said, there is a component of offline as well as online to these programs. I mean, going back to the vendor side, the org charts are always confused in the first place, does this belong in digital? Does this belong somewhere else? But the best programs always have face-to-face meetings and of course, those are off the table now. So that really kind of levels the playing field in a certain way. You still have people at home, the people who are working are working harder than ever, a lot of layoffs in the industry. So those people are kind of either trying to cope, some of them have time for more creative outlets. So we're seeing a resurgence in people making content and discussions and online forums and online discussion. So that's really interesting. A lot of- John, sourdough bread, you forgot the sourdough bread. You're making sourdough bread. I made some this morning. It was pretty good. The nice thing is it levels the playing field, right? Whether you're in Croatia or Cleveland or the middle of Silicon Valley, you can start to attend these things. I mean, I know some folks who were saying, I was hampered by attending meetups because I have a family or a childcare or a job duties and now they're able to attend virtually. So even if it's in a different city. So in some ways, this is a great leveler. This allows us, everyone to participate to the level of their interest and their energy. You know, but there are downsides. Yeah, no, absolutely. One of the questions, there were always the people like, oh, I'm feeling left out because I'm not at that event. Well, you know, absolutely. You mentioned, you know, the home strains are there. You know, if you had a family situation that might have kept you from traveling, well, chances are you probably have some family things that might not free you up to be able to spend, you know, multiple hours doing things, but it shifts it and it does level the playing field.  So sounds like, right, they're, I'm curious if you think there will be lessons learned and it is early days, of course, but one of the questions we say is, you know, what will we have as a takeaway from there and what will be permanent when we talk about, say, communities and how we engage with them? Well, the whole kind of community developer relations space is always a little bit, it's a little bit aside from revenue producing, right? So it's not quite straight marketing. It's not really revenue producing. So there's always a tension there in the tech community. The folks that are connected to their business, the folks that have developed relationships and have that already created asset of these existing relationships are doing well, especially if they're connected back to their business. Because this is a time to make those connections to retrench, my family is talking a lot more and your ecosystem, your tech family should be talking a lot more, your customers and partners. So those folks are doing well. We've also seen a lot of layoffs because these are seen in some companies as non-essential or as just non-productive. And if I got to cut something, you know, the community team goes, if it's not strategically connected to, you know, back to the business. So I think one of the lessons is those relationships in a time like this are strategically important. And I mean, we can drill down on that, but I think that's gonna be one of the takeaways that the companies that have built these networks and built their strong ecosystems are gonna come out the winners here. I mean, John, you brought up a big point here. As we speak right now, I think the number in the US is over the last five weeks, it's about 30 million people that are out of a job. Those are staggering numbers. I mean, it had been decades, you know, there was never a million of new unemployed here and 30 million just, you know, does boggle the mind. Then you have companies like Amazon that have hired 170,000 people and it's not just the manufacturing, you know, and the distribution of things. I've seen people get hired by AWS during these times, but it is, you know, it feels like there's a little bit of falling on some of the movement. Some people that had had jobs frozen a month ago now seem that they are now moving through the system again there, but absolutely the financial ripples of what's happening here are something that is going to be with us for many quarters going forward. Yeah, I think one of the other lessons that we'll learn is the nature of events, right? We were in event overload, the cube is a witness to that. You're on the road many, many weeks a year. In fact, you have to clone yourself. There's so many, you have multiple teams out on the road during conference season. And a lot of people were saying there's too much. I can't get, there's just too many events. I can't go to them all. I can't even pay attention to them. Well, now we're trying to take all those events and squirt them through the tiny pinhole of a digital experience. And Twitter and Facebook and video like this, you had a multi-channel, very rich interactive experience.  We're beginning, I think, to rethink what this, how this marketing playbook works, right? The digital event has many different roles. Yeah, no, you're absolutely right. Donna, I had been asking for a few years to dial down some my travel. I didn't ask for it to go to zero. So I'd be careful what you wish for out there, but good, I'm glad you brought up the virtual events, digital events, whatever you want to call them. We know as an industry that there is work to be done to make them better. You were just an interruption or a mouse click away from being pulled away from this online environment and everyone is learning as we go. We've been spending a lot of time working with companies, trying to learn lessons, trying to ask the questions about what is critically important. And engagement, it's tough. We know community, John, is something that isn't that you just stand it up. It is constant care and feeding. And when events going on, community is a piece of that thing. And how do we maintain that in a virtual world? So anything you've seen that you like or things that you'd like to see more when it comes to, how do we make things engaging? And how do you make people feel welcomed in part of it rather than just watching something on the web and streaming content at me? I think there's a few things. One is we're blowing the digital experience apart, right? There are multiple jobs to be done. There are multiple audiences. I went to a big conference today. I'm not a practitioner for this particular tech company. I'm not interested in all the breakouts. I am interested in the keynotes and I would be interested in some networking. So a large part of kind of community developer relationship, all these, this relationship building happens during and after their dinners and receptions and things like that. So you can replace that and it doesn't have to be right after the big keynote. So we're breaking these things apart. I see people, I've talked to different vendors breaking big events into a series of smaller events, breaking it into audiences and executive series of events, a practitioner series of events. And then I think frankly, the produced thing, the produced component of the show can use an upgrade too. I mean, I'm looking at the way our TV talk shows have adapted over the last month or two and they all started off with like a crappy webcam or an iPhone. And now many of them have a very interesting format that have adapted to their hosts and their guests being both at home and separate. So there's a psychological through comfort level and through line to having an anchor, to having a host, things like that maybe isn't necessary when you're 5,000 people in an auditorium and clapping. It's just a different feeling. So John, are we calling to see, you know, which executive has a child that can help with some hand drawn slides and things that they can put up there? You never know. That's been a rather interesting one. Many people have commented that they like the evening news now when the kids and the wife and the dog and the husband interrupt, right? It's humanizing. And frankly, that's my business and that's what I help companies do is humanize themselves and, you know, you can sprinkle a little bit in. I mean, we'll get tired of the kids hand drawn stuff, you know, if we're staying at home for too many more months. Yeah, you know, I kind of wonder enterprise sales, is that the message we want going through when we want you to do, you know, a subscription that will be millions of dollars a year that there's a hand drawn thing. So a little bit of a gap between the enterprise and, you know, what they might take, but you bring up a really good point, right, John? That experience, personalizing it, absolutely is something that can be done.  You need to think about that audience, focus on what they do. You know, we're always, of course, focused on the cube is, you know, we want really good content and, you know, real conversations with people.  That interaction that I get at shows, how much can I make people feel that I've talked to people? You should be able to get more, you know, executive access.   The platforms can enable that sort of thing.  You want to be able to make it personal down to small groups or even individuals. And there is the opportunity to do that. A lot of times people talk about the hallway track. But you've got to realize the hallway track is not the same for everybody. If you have gone to the same conference for 10 years and you know a lot of the people and see familiar faces, the hallway track is great.  And that's when the real work gets done.  So again, we come back to the companies that have established these relationships, who have built these, you know, have these onboarding experiences, now are going to be the winners.  Right, I'm listening to you and I'm thinking of, you know, the blogger lounge at VMworld where, you know, you and I go and we know lots of people but we also meet lots of new people because they show up and everybody is like, hey, you need to meet all of these other people. So you're right, there's ways to be able to take those influencers and those people to help concierge, help make connections and do those things. A couple of real straightforward tips though. Single track things work really well for those scale events because you can just drop in, you know exactly what's live. Multi track, very much harder to figure out what's going on live. I know it's live. The other thing I've seen from a lot of tech community events is an accompanying Slack with prerecorded talks and with the speaker then in different Slack channels, the speaker's there, you can chit-chat while it's live. So it's Slack or any kind of chat. But Slack, you know, if you're already in a community Slack, that works really well. So this kind of dual multi-channel live interaction I think can be one of the things that works right away. Yeah, absolutely, you know, a little plug that's similar to what we'll have for DockerCon. So on the content tracks, you know, most of them I believe will be, you know, recorded ahead of time. So those experts, you'll actually be able to ask questions. They'll be interacting in real time, you know, whether you like it threaded or unthreaded, there's options that we're choosing on that kind of stuff. All right, John, wanna give you the final word. You know, obviously we're kind of in the middle of things here. You know, it feels like we're in the new abnormal if it were, but, you know, right here at the end of April, just about into May, some states are opening up. We don't know when we'll be able to go from 10 people to 25 to 50 or more people. So, you know, trying to understand some of those pieces. What are you looking for going forward? Any last tips you wanna give the community? Well, I think we're in, I think we're in kind of in here for a long haul, at least before we bring 80,000, 100,000 people together from all over the world. So, you know, the old saw is, you know, the best time to plan a tree was 20 years ago. The second best time is today. You figure out what your metrics are. They're not gonna be the same as the old metrics. You figure out what your audiences are looking for. What's in it for them? Do they want training? Do they want networking? And you start to deliver it to them and you iterate. None of us, look, community people and developer relations people aren't experts at digital marketing. Event people aren't experts at digital marketing. In fact, the digital marketing people aren't experts at digital marketing in this context. So, we're all learning. And, you know, it's gonna, there's gonna be a lot of money spent and we'll figure it out eventually. You know, I think over the course of this year. Yeah, absolutely. It's the learning mindset is what we all need. The things that have, you know, brought my spirits up the most are the communities engaging, whether it's working on the pandemic or just, you know, sharing what they've seen, what they'd like to do better. That collaboration has been something really good to see. All right. John Schreyer, great to see you as always. Look forward to talking much more with you in the future. And thanks again. Thanks for having me, Stu. Stay safe. All right. Stu Miniman, thanks as always for joining us and watching theCUBE.


zero accounting software 2023 populate invoice using information from a purchase order or P.O. get ready to become an accountant hero with zero 2023 first a word from our sponsor well actually these are just items that we picked from the YouTube shopping affiliate program but that's actually good for you because these aren't things that were just given to us from some large corporation which we don't even use in exchange for us selling them to you these are things that we actually researched purchase and use ourselves focus right Scarlett solo third-gen USB interface with software suite I've been using a focus right for years for my audio needs before which time I had a USB microphone which plugged directly into the computer but I think you'll find as I have found if you want to increase the quality of your microphone you will need an interface and the focus right is to go to interface as far as I'm concerned I've been using this for years now it works well it's easy to use it seems quite durably built because I only do the screen recordings I only need the one solo interface however if you have multiple microphones you need to plug in or if you have other instruments you need to plug in you can look at a similar model that has more input ports if you would like a commercial free experience consider subscribing to our website at accounting instruction.com or accounting instruction.thinkific.com where we have many different courses you can purchase one at a time or have a subscription model given you access to all the courses courses which are well organized have other resources like excel files and PDF files to download and no commercials here we are in our custom zero home page going into the company file we set up in a prior presentation get great guitars we're gonna duplicate some tabs to put reports in by right-clicking the tab up top to duplicate it then we're gonna right-click the tab again and duplicate it again back to the tab to the middle accounting drop-down let's open up the balance sheet and then we'll go to the tab to the right accounting drop-down we're gonna open up the income statement but I'm gonna pick up this comparative income statement we made in a prior presentation comparing January and February the current month we are working in being February back to the balance sheet hitting the drop-down we're gonna customize that date range bringing it up to 2023 and the end of 2023 updating the report back to the first tab now we're gonna we're gonna now create an invoice from a purchase order that we created so let's take a quick look at the flow chart to get the scenario down this is a flow chart from a screenshot of QuickBooks desktop but we're just using it to see the normal flow of our forms through a general accounting process or accounting cycle so we're touching on inventory here which means we're gonna be touching on both the vendor or payable or expense cycle as well as the sales or revenue or customer cycle so we imagine our stories starting out someone came into the shop and said I would like a particular type of guitar we said hey we don't have that guitar they wanted it from Fender which is a new vendor we've never done business with Fender before that time so we said hey we'll try to contact Fender as a new vendor and see if we can get that guitar for you so we made then a purchase order to request inventory from the new vendor Fender now then of course we're hoping that that item comes through as inventory when we receive the inventory we entered it into the system with a bill type of form increase in accounts payable and the other side going to inventory now we have the guitar in the shop now what we would like to do is because we purchased this guitar for a particular customer is turn around an invoice go into the sales side of things using an invoice form to invoice the customer for the the piece of inventory that we purchased now zero has a nice feature for us to be able to do that fairly quickly by taking the purchase order and basically just copying it over to help us to automatically create the invoice so that's the strategy that we will use let's go back on over here so if we follow our story in zero we're gonna say all right what happened we entered our purchase order so if I go to the business drop down and we go down to the purchase order items we had a purchase order here it was approved and then we build out the purchase order for Fender so that there's the one that we build out now we want to turn around and have the invoice let's go to the first tab where we have our purchase order here and let's go into that purchase order notice that if it was in this section awaiting approval then it would have a little check box here and you'd be able to possibly copy it to a bill like from this screen but we've already build it out so I'm gonna go into the purchase order go into all the purchase orders and go into this Fender purchase order here and then we have the options tab up top so I'm gonna select the options tab and I want to copy it to and we will copy it this time not to a bill like we did before that's for us paying completing the purchases cycle but now to an invoice so we can turn around and use this to to populate the revenue side of things to generate the revenue so we're gonna go here I'm gonna say it's a new customer I'm gonna say it's gonna be new music I don't think we have this customer yet stuff new music stuff generic customer name for us there that's our new customer it's gonna happen let's see if I can get the date right for once get it right man just get it right for once okay get off my back get off my back I'm gonna get the day so to February 22 let's go with that one and standard so the squire pulled in properly that's looks good and notice this pulled it in like it should pulling in the sales price rather than the cost you'll recall that when we try to like take the billable items from an expense form using inventory items in other words if you if you purchase something purchase inventory with a bill and try to make it a billable item that you can then pull over or sign the cost to the customer then sometimes it gets a little bit tricky that the item doesn't pull over the proper sales price but rather the cost here this function works quite well as you would imagine it would because this is designed specifically for this usage and we'll recall that this item has two costs related to it or two dollar amounts related to it one the cost side when we set up the item and to the sale side and we're on the sale side of the transaction so this should be the sales amount here alright so we have a standard invoice then what's the invoice going to do well it's an invoice it's gonna increase accounts receivable by the 5124 the 5124 the other side is going to be going to revenue but for the amount that we put in for the sales price 4880 the difference the 244 sales tax is going to go into a payable account as a liability and the inventory is going to go down not by this amount but by the cost which the system knows because of the item and the cost of goods sold the expense related to us selling our inventory is going to go up net effect on net income is going to be the sales price 5124 minus that cost of goods sold and the sub ledger for the accounts receivable but we'll be tracking who owes us money by customer and the sub ledger for the inventory will track not only the dollar amount but the units of inventory on a perpetual inventory system let's approve it and check it out and see if that is indeed the case or if I'm a dang liar your liar I'm not a liar let's go back on let's check it out we'll go to the balance sheet here and say let's drill down on the accounts receivable to see what's in it so drilling down to see what's in it we're gonna go down and say okay there it is so that's for the full amount in the accounts receivable see see I told you so and then if I go to the tab to the right and we update then we're gonna go then to the sales tab sales in February and check it out and we should have that one item on there not for not including the sales tax so here it is there it is not including the sales tax so that's correct I believe let's go back up the difference going back to the balance sheet is on the sales tax payable let's just check it out drilling down to take a look drilling down to go down to the see what's happening receive invoice so there it is on this one okay and we know that inventory is going down to so inventory is here let's take a look at that one it's going on the books not at the sales price but at the cost which is known by the system because of the inventory item and so there it is that's not an amount actually on the invoice but known by the system back on over and the cost of goods sold on the income statement again is here it's right there I yeah right there and so we're gonna say new music stuff there it is what's the net impact on net income well we had an increase in sales and an increase in the cost of goods sold the difference between the two is the impact on the income statement then if I go back to the balance sheet we know there should be a sub ledger that ties out to that accounts receivable tracking by customer let's make another report tap into the right right click on it duplicate it and make another report breaking it out by customer just so we can double check that concept so accounting drop down we're gonna go into the reports and let's scroll down to the payable and receivable reports let's go into the aged receivable summary just give us the summary just give us the summary if you would so we're I think the date will be okay there so we'll just I just want to break it out by there's our four customers here's the totals that each of them owe us there's the 19111 50 there it is also the 1918 1150 on the balance sheet I said it wrong did I say it wrong or was it wrong it's not wrong I just said it wrong 1981150 1981150 okay and we should have a sub ledger for inventory breaking out the inventory items by unit and by dollar amount so let's break that out tab into the right right click let's duplicate again so we can open up another report to double check double check reports let's just type in inventory up top to look at our inventory reports and just to note that it is doing behaving as it should so now we have our inventory items on the right and then our total cost is the 6864 that should tie up to what's on the balance sheet and on the balance is this the balance sheet it is where's the 686 there it is 6864 right there it's right in front of your face man okay then let's go to the tab to the left and we can also track of course the inventory the invoice so if I hit the business drop down and look at my invoices internally now we expect to get paid on the invoices here's all the invoices these are the ones that are open over here awaiting payment so we can see that we can also track it by going to the customers contacts customers and we made a new customer you can see basically the detail of they owe you which is kind of like our report that we opened up but it doesn't give us that nice total to give us that double check that verification that this is indeed breaking out more information about the line item on the balance sheet of accounts receivable so here's the new music stuff that's the one we set up pretty generic name but I'm still at least it wasn't just cuts customer one right I came I came up with something at least alright so let's open up the trial balance and see where we stand at this point tab and to the right we're gonna go to the accounting drop down reports and see the trustee trial balance you can always trust the trial balance because it's it's on trial it's got a trial court to it or something I don't know customize 2023 and update it here's where we stand at this point in time if your numbers tie out great if not then if you tied out last time and you're checking that your numbers and you're off this time the things we changed were the accounts receivable we changed the inventory we changed the sales tax payable we changed the revenue line item down here on sales line item and we changed the cost of good soul so if something's off you would think those would be the thing that's off if you were on last time and you could try to change the date range see if it's a date issue then drill down on the data and possibly down to the source document that invoice perhaps and correct the date if that's the issue


like scary movies. Uh-huh. What's your favorite scary movie? I don't know. You have to have a favorite. What comes to mind? Halloween. You know, the one with the guy in the white mask who walks around in stocks babysitters. While making Scream 4 back in 2011, West Craven confirmed that he was contracted to make both Scream 5 and 6 if Scream 4 were to be a hit. Kevin Williamson, the screenwriter for Scream 2 and Scream 4, also revealed that he too was contracted for three films and had concepts for the future films up to Scream 6. Back then, Williamson stated that a Scream 5 would feature characters from Scream 4 and serve as a continuation of that story. But Scream 4 turned out to be the least successful entry in the franchise, failing to crack $100 million worldwide, a feat that the first three films all consistently hit. It didn't even make a profit domestically, so unfortunately plans for a fifth Scream film were put on the back burner. Despite this, for years after Scream 4, rumors of the possibility of Scream 5 were still swirling. However, the largest blow to the franchise occurred on August 30, 2015, when the iconic director West Craven passed away. He had not only spearheaded the historic Scream franchise, but also spawned another horror staple with the long-running Nightmare on Omshree series. I mean, this man freighted Sydney Prescott, Ghost Face, Nancy Thompson, and Freddy Krueger, among so many others. This tragic passing pretty much silenced the talk of a fifth installment of the franchise, and it is truly hard to imagine a Scream film without West Craven at the helm. But the future of the franchise got a lot more hopeful after the 2018 reboot of Halloween at Blumhouse Productions became the highest-grossing film in that franchise, and it even broke the record that the original Scream had held for the highest-grossing slasher film of all time. The success that Laurie Strode and Michael Myers found in this new era led Blumhouse to Greenlight Scream 5 in 2019, hoping to ring in a new era of slashers, the soft reboot era. Because Halloween isn't a full reboot, although it does disregard every film besides the first one, it acts as a sequel to the original film while also introducing the franchise to a whole new audience. Luckily Scream's anthology is not nearly as convoluted as Halloween's, so this Scream film will very likely take place in the same world as the first four, and we are already confirmed to be returning to Woodsboro. This does beg the question though, will this be called Scream 5, or will they try to emulate the success of 2018's Halloween and just call it simply Scream? Honestly, I would be surprised if they ended up calling it Scream 5, I think it is all but confirmed to be called Scream. The problem with calling it Scream 5 is if you're not a diehard Scream fan, you won't want to buy a ticket to this film, thinking you have to catch up on the happenings of the first four films. I would appreciate it having potentially a tagline or something, just because it is a little confusing having two films in a single series having the same name, but I mean Halloween has three movies now that are just called Halloween, so I guess I'll get over it. Let me know in the comments what you would like Scream 5 to be titled, but now let's get into the cast of Scream 5 which has slowly been being revealed for a couple months now. Let's talk legacy characters or major characters from the series that are returning. David Arquette was the first legacy actor to be confirmed for the sequel, reprising his role as Dewey Riley from all four previous films. Soon after Courtney Cox was confirmed to be reprising the legend herself, Gil Weathers. And finally after months of just being in talks, Nev Campbell is returning as Sydney Prescott. Roger L Jackson will also be returning, providing the voice of Ghostface. So our big three are confirmed to be back for the sequel, but there is one other legacy character that has been confirmed, and it's probably not who you would expect. Marley Shelton is reprising her role as Judy Hicks from Scream 4. At first I wasn't sure why this seemingly unremarkable character was being brought back, but the more I think of it, I think it could be really interesting. If you don't recall, Judy Hicks was a deputy next to Dewey in Scream 4 in Woodsboro, and there was this whole awkward scene between Judy and Sydney in the movie where Judy's like, pay Sydney, remember me from high school, and then Sydney clearly doesn't remember her. So maybe there's some deep-rooted jealousy or resentment that Judy has for Sydney, or maybe Judy could actually turn and become Ghostface. Or she's completely innocent and sane and just here for some continuity between the last film and this one, but it could go either way. Obviously the theorizer in my mind kind of takes over every once in a while. It is probably way more likely that she's just still the deputy at Woodsboro and just providing some continuity from the last film to this one. But next, let's run down all the new cast members. Melissa Barrera, Jenna Ortega, who you may know from season two of Netflix's You, Jack Quaid, Dylan Manette from Thirteen Reasons Why, Kyle Galner, Jasmine Brown, Mikey Madison, and Sonia Amar. I'm really intrigued by this cast because it is mostly unknown actors, at least to me. I mean I've seen Jenna Ortega in You and I've heard of Dylan Manette, but the rest I have never heard of and I think that's a good thing. I would be bombarded with comments if I didn't mention the rumor of Selena Gomez potentially being a part of the cast. There has been a lot of speculation about Selena potentially being the opening kill of the movie and the rumor does have some evidence backing it up. Firstly, a handful of Scream 5 cast members all suddenly followed the singer and Courtney Cox even commented on one of her posts stating that she can't wait to meet her and then that comment was deleted. So I think one of two things happened. One, Selena is actually a part of the film and fans caught on really quick and now the studio is making the cast cover their tracks. Or two, the rumor started and the PR team for the film began to take advantage of it to get more people aware of the film. I'm not sure which way this could go but I personally think Selena being a first kill would kind of be predictable, but who knows. I wouldn't hate it by any means but I do think they really need to reinvent the opening kill for this film. But maybe this is the way to do that and I do trust the filmmakers. So let me know what you think about this rumor in the comments. But speaking of the filmmakers, this film will be the first in the franchise that will not be directed by Wes Craven. Instead the film is being helmed by Matt Bedanelli, Open, and Tyler Gillett. This pair notably were the directors of 2019's Ready or Not, which if you haven't seen is a really fun film. It's a comedy horror fusion and is really well done and is a great film to rewatch multiple times. Although it's not quite the scream tone, the balance of comedy and horror is definitely in a similar vein of scream and I'm sure these filmmakers are scream fans so I do trust them to emulate the tone of the film. And I personally think that this duo could be the perfect choice to not only direct a scream film, which like I said is a very specific style and tone, but I also think they can really bring something new and fresh to the series and I'm very excited to see how it turns out. The screenplay will also not be done by Kevin Williamson and it will instead be written by James Vanderbilt and Guy Busick. But Kevin Williamson is on as an executive producer and I think he will be certainly nudging the film in the direction he has intended. Guy Busick wrote Ready or Not and James Vanderbilt is known for writing films such as The Amazing Spider-Man and White House Down. In terms of the film's plot, we only have a short synopsis that reads, the film follows the story of a young woman who returns to her old hometown, only to encounter horrific murder cases connected to an infamous masked serial killer. And like I said before, it is confirmed that this small town is Woodsboro. Originally filming for the film was set to begin in May of 2020 with a 2021 release date, but then, you know, that didn't happen. But luckily, Screen 5 was one of the first productions to resume this fall and it's currently being filmed in Wilmington, North Carolina. And there have been a few leaks from the set, just mostly some set photos and I will be doing a quick montage of those set photos right now. Like I said, the film was initially supposed to come out in 2021, but now the film has a release date of January 14th, 2022. So not too far off, I mean, it'll be a year away before we know it. And this hopefully gives the world enough time to recover from this pandemic and we will be able to safely attend a movie theater by that time. So let me know, are you excited for Screen 5? Let me know all of your thoughts in the comments below. Leave this video a like and subscribe for more horror news and content.


I assume some of you asked yourself what does the life of an astrophysicist look like? This topic is very interesting. Today we have Katrin Bergmann from the star of the Rete Hamburg. She'll talk about how every day looks like, historically, what the research looks like. And they also have a cat there, I think it's very interesting. Yeah, thank you for the invitation. My name is Katrin. I work in Hamburg at the observatory as a scientific employee. I write my doctor thesis there. I will talk about the observatory. And first I'll talk about the history of the observatory and talk about what we do today. And yeah, let's start. We have Johann Georg Rebscheut at the end of the 17th century, 1700s. He was the spritzenmeister of the firefighters in Hamburg. He was very interested in stars. And he was the first one who founded the observatory in Hamburg. It was a private observatory at the Stindfang for those who live in Hamburg. And he observed the sky. This observatory in 1811, sadly, was destroyed. But he also initiated that it was the first city observatory, star observatory. And navigators were educated, which was also important for naval operations. This is also part of the Hamburg history. Johann Georg Rebscheut in 1830 died, sadly. But he also, thankfully, fully saw that the observatory was founded. There's a lot of things that are named after him. There's also a boat in the haven that also says oba spritzenmeister Rebscheut. And his children also continued this tradition and used optical instruments that also were used for astronomers and also for navigation and so forth. All right. This was the first star observatory in Hamburg. This was also the millen-tor. Since 1833, this was a national institute, also funded by the government. And this is also why the haven in Hamburg, because it's important, as I said, for navigation also for the time. But at the end of the 1800s, it became clear that this location wasn't possible to be used for research because it became brighter and brighter. Also with electrification and more and more lights were used in the city. We thought about where we would choose a new location. And today, this is also a Hamburg history is also observed there. In 1906, we started to build the Bergdorf Observatory. In the past, you can see on the photo, nothing was around there. Today, there's a lot of houses. And this was an ideal location for an observatory because also was on a hill and because in the past, there wasn't so much around. It was an ideal location. It was built between 1912. It was a national institute for a long time. Until in 1968, it has been integrated to the University of Hamburg. Since 1996, the observatory is under protection. And there's also a try to make it a world cultural heritage. But it's not yet really predetermined whether this works and would be nice if this would work. Okay, now we have a few images of how it looked like in the early 20th century. So 1913, one year after it was inaugurated, two of the largest telescopes that are still on site were inaugurated too. We have this elongated one that is this large refractor that is a lens telescope. And it was one of the largest in Germany at the time. On the left, we have a mirror telescope, which works a bit differently, which I'm going to talk about later. But these two were then put in place. And what was new with this observatory is that there were separate buildings for each telescope. You can see in the background here, there are individual telescopes in each building. Before that, in the 1800s, things were different. He would put these telescopes onto the roof of a larger building. But the larger the telescopes became, the less practical that became, and there was a need for individual housing. And also due to the air movement generated from the heating, if you would relocate these telescopes to individual buildings, you would then be able to build them without heating so that the conditions would be more ideal. And the Begudov Observatory was one of the first to have separate buildings for its telescopes moving on. So I just mentioned that there are basically two kinds of telescopes. You have mirror telescopes and lens telescopes. The mirror telescopes work like this. You have the light beam coming in. The main mirror reflects and collects the light, bundles it onto a secondary mirror. And that mirror then reflects it back to the ocular or eyepiece, or in current times it would be a CCTV camera, perhaps. And in contrast, we have the lens telescopes, which are similar to simple binoculars. The amplification works through lenses, not mirrors. And the light rays go through these lenses. The second lens deflects them a second time into the ocular or the camera. And in the early 20th century, these two were kind of in competition with each other, but it became clear pretty early that mirror telescopes were the better and more practical solution because you were able to achieve higher resolutions and the binoculars you would have to make longer and longer. And you can imagine that with increasing weights, things wouldn't be as practical anymore. Longer telescopes that are very thin are not that easy to build. It's ability is the issue here. And with mirrors, you can just increase the diameter. You don't have to increase the length of the tube. Now these days, the ELT, that's the extremely large telescope, astronomers like to have these interesting wordings for their telescopes. The ELT has a 40 meter diameter. And current research has mirror telescopes as standard. The Hubble Space Telescope and others, they all use mirror telescopes. And lens telescopes are used for amateurs, but not professionals anymore. And the other issue with lenses is that there might be chromatic errors. Colors might change because the different wavelengths reflect, deflect it differently. And that creates inaccuracies in the image. So these days mirrors are dominant. And I now have a few slides about the largest telescopes we currently have. Reflect refractor here, that's how it looked like in the past. In recent years, the whole building was renovated. You can see the wooden paneling in the dome. And you can see that the Repsoled Company, which is the descendants of the founder, they built this. And you have this mechanism that lifts the telescope up. And it can be moved up and down this way for increased flexibility for finding all these various places. And that was built by Carl Zeiss Jena, a company you may have heard of. And the whole telescope has a 60 centimeter lens and nine meters focal length. Then we have the one meter mirror telescope, which is also from 1913, just like the large refractor, the large lens telescope. Again, built by Carl Zeiss Jena. And this is how it looks. You see, it's more compact than the lens telescope. And when it was built, it was actually the largest telescope in Germany and the fourth largest worldwide. And it's very heavy, 26 tons, is its weight. But there wasn't as much electronics back in 1913, but it can all be operated by hand. The transmission has been built this way. There is a count of weight. And these are all used for observation today. And by us employees, if the weather plays along, we can then do observations, whatever we like. But for research, this kind of equipment isn't used anymore because current opportunities are so much better. But it's still very nice to have these and show people how things work. We have one more modern telescope, the Oskar-Lüning telescope. Another mirror telescope works quite the same as the one that we saw in the earlier slide. But this is digitized. You can control it at home using your computer. You don't have to turn levers or anything like that. It's controlled by a Raspberry Pi. And this one is used in internships in the physics education. And you're in university. During the course in university, you will have to have an internship in various research institutions. And we are one of those, and controlling the telescope and making observations with it is part of that. So it's actually used not for current research maybe, but it's used in the university sector. Right. I'll get to the topic of today, what the research focuses on today. I'll talk about it. You can see our nice main building. There's also a library in there. And on top, we have an own separate radio telescope that's also done by physics students for their internships. We do a lot of radio astronomy with low-frequency array telescope. I'll talk about this later because that's a radio telescope that we also have a site in Nordostadt. There's also an internship trial with the three-meter radio telescope on the roof. What we are also doing, we also do X-ray astronomy, infrared astronomy, and also partially optical astronomy. We cover almost all, so most of the research fields. I'll talk about this more in detail now. X-rays, radio, and so forth. The telescopes I talked about before, the refractor, those are making optical observations. For a long time, this has been the main field of research of astronomy.  This means we here have the light, normal light, have certain wavelengths that our eyes are trained to. Those are wavelengths in the nanometer area. We have this range that we can see with our eyes. But the electromagnetic spectrum, those are just wavelengths that are very different. It's just lights that our eyes can capture. We need to build separate devices, for example, for X-rays or radio waves so that we can look at them. So we also have what the atmosphere, how penetrable the atmosphere is for certain wavelengths. We have the locked gamma rays or X-rays, waves with very long wavelengths that they can't get through. That's actually good because it protects us humans from these rays. But so for us to do X-ray astronomy, we need to build telescopes on satellites. And they have to be put outside of the atmosphere on the satellites. And they're outside of the atmosphere. They take the pictures. And we can download the pictures from the satellites and do astronomy, X-ray astronomy. And it's pretty similar with infrared. Some of you might have noticed that the James Webb telescope has launched on the 25th. This is also an infrared telescope. And that's because it's also not infrared light. It's also absorbed by the atmosphere. And that's why it has to be outside of the atmosphere. We also lucky that there's a large area of radio waves where the atmosphere is transparent for those. And we can build this observatory on Earth. And there's been a large field of research because with radio waves, we can also observe very massive black holes at the core of galaxies, which we can't do with optical telescopes. Also this picture of the black hole a few years ago that has been very much in the public eye. This is also a radio picture. Yeah, I've explained this now. We also have the lofa that I've mentioned before, the low frequency array. This is a radio telescope. It has several locations all throughout Europe. And one is also in Nordostadt. It's a radio telescope. It looks completely different from a telescope that you can look through. It's just a bit of antennas. These are pictures of the field in Nordostadt. There's an array out of 69 antennas. And these antennas are the radio telescope, part of the radio text. This technology is pretty simple. The IT behind it is not that simple because it generates a lot of data. Because you can imagine 96 antennas, they all receive the data. But we also have to calculate all the different combinations. And there's very large data volumes that have to be processed. And that's why the station at Nordostadt, we had separate fiber optic cables. It doesn't really look spectacularly. There's just a container where all the cables come together and they get transported further from there. I also have some numbers here. It generates 10 terabits per second. And we have a 10 gigabit connection there so that we can have proper connection. This low frequency array is being expanded with new locations. And yes, but you can imagine the more stations you have and the farther they are from each other, the better the resolution you can achieve. You can imagine if you have just one telescope that has such a large diameter. A large diameter means a better resolution. And this also means that you have a better image in total. That's what we want. This was the radio. I'll just get to X-ray telescopes. I'm working on this particular project. I do X-ray astronomy, not that much radio. This is the project Erosita. This has been started in 2019, not too recently. This is also cooperation between Germany and Russia. And this is a radio telescope. It's on a satellite. It delivers us data already since for two years. It scans the entire sky continuously. It takes pictures of the entire sky and receives radio X-ray rays. We have 0.5 to 10 kiloelectron volts. We also observe objects like galaxy clusters that are really big, but also very far. And these galaxy clusters emit X-rays. And then we can observe with this telescope. This has been done by the Max Pank Institute for extraterrestrial physics. And this is a big project. And we can be very curious what is still being discovered there. The galaxy clusters, I've talked about that. What do we do with these X-ray and radio waves? It's interesting to look at objects. What does this look like in the X-ray as well as in the radio waves? The galaxy clusters are a good target if you want to look at large structures because galaxy clusters are very large clusters that are bound gravitationally. Galaxy clusters consist of 50 to 1,000 galaxies. And those are gravitationally bound. And they build blocks in the universe. If you would zoom further out, you would see these blocks of galaxies that spread. And because these are large, continuous objects, you can look at them even if they're very far. And this is analogous to being early in time because they're far away. We can also see how they look like right after the Big Bang. Or not too shortly after the Big Bang. And we can look at how the universe looked in the past and how did it evolve. So you can see in the optical spectrum, it doesn't look that good. But because of the gravitational forces, the gas between these galaxies is being heated up so much that it shines in the X-ray area and also in the radio waves. This means that in these galaxy clusters can be easily found through X-rays. And you can do comparisons. How does it look like in different wavelengths? And you can learn at best how the universe developed and how did it form. I have one other topic. Many of you will know from classical physics there is always this distinction between theoretical and experimental physics. And in astronomy, it is somewhat similar. I work on real data used by the telescope that I talked about earlier. That's what I work with. So I am an observational astronomer that is the equivalent to the experimental physicist. But the astrophysics has a theoretical side as well. These are people that run simulations. Computation astrophysics is how they call that. They simulate the universe using various models. And we can then see how well do our observations, our discoveries, fit those simulations. So the people running these simulations come up with a model saying this and that is the basic forces and my initial conditions. The starting conditions. And I then add a few physical laws to that and see how the whole thing changes. And we can then compare that with our observations and see whether the model suits the observations or not. And that's what you can do. Right. We call these n-body simulations meaning that you have a certain number of particles that you start with and that you work on and you can run Monte Carlo methods or things like that. And that is a very computationally intensive kind of research. And it has developed a lot in the last few years because, of course, you can do amazing computations these days that you couldn't do 10 years ago. A very large computing center is in the city of Julich in Western Germany. That's what the image here is showing. It's UL's Computational Center. You can run parallel computing here. And high performance computers can be used for these tasks. And we have a very famous simulation that is the Millennium Run. This project has been in existence since 2000. And in 2005, I had the first run on 2160 to the power of three number of particles. And you cannot say that one particle would represent one billion solar masses in dark matter. That's what you can say. One particle. So you don't see galaxies developing but dark matter. So one particle represents one billion solar masses of dark matter. And you can insert these irregularities and see how it develops using the physical laws that we have. And you can zoom in. You can see these networks, these clumps. And that's what you can observe as well. That was run on a supercomputer in Garching in southern Germany in Bavaria. It took a month's computing time, 25 terabytes of data. And in 2010, it was upgraded with the second run to 6,720 to the power of three particles. And the computer Europa, or duropa, which has 12,000 cores, that was equivalent to 300 years of CPU time on another computer. So you can see how there is a lot of potential still in this kind of research. So having theoretical astrophysics and having ever better means for comparing those results with observations. And that gets me to the end of my talk. I've collected a few links for you. I have the universities, the supporting association. And I'm available for questions. A 3D walk through the observatories. I hope you found it entertaining and interesting. And I'm looking forward to your questions. Thank you so much. I've been a few questions in the chat already. And I'm sure there are more to come. I'll start with the first question. First one is about the dome in the observatory. Is the dome, actually, can you track the sky's movement? You can control it electrically, yes. Next question about the radio telescopes. How can you filter out the terrestrial signals? Surely they are much stronger than everything. That is actually quite complicated, yes. There are very complex calculations that are used here. That's a very good question. But there are good models that you take these data out. And it's very complex. And there are people working on that full time to filter out the disturbances, the signals from the Earth. So it's the same wave things. Surely you really have to do the calculations. Yeah, there are some parts of the radio spectrum that are kept free from terrestrial signals. But it's not that simple. And there are disturbances in radio astronomy. You really have to live with that and try to deal with that and filter it. OK. Have there been cases when people thought they had observed something and then found that it was terrestrial? No, actually it's quite clear to see every time terrestrial signals can be discerned. OK. A question about the observatory. In the past, apparently the idea to relocate the employees to the DC in Barenfeld in Hamburg, is that still a debate? No, it's not. But yeah, the thought had existed. And it's actually fairly natural because we don't use the telescopes anymore.  So it wouldn't really matter where we work. But still, despite being historic, it is worth upkeeping and for inviting people in for evenings and to be sitting there as astrophysicists. So the thinking isn't anymore that we would be relocated. I have a remark as well. Nothing has been said about the cat. Can you comment on the cat? I don't know. We have a cat that is running around and likes to be fed by everyone. It's gained and put on a bit too much weight. And it lives here. And with every talk, every dissertation, he's defending the cat in the first row and likes to take part. Oh yeah, please bring the cat along to the next real CCC. OK, are there any more questions from the chat? I'll check. Otherwise, we would switch over to the extended Q&A, which will be in German and not interpreted. I see a lot of joy that the observatory is being maintained. And of course, we are very happy about it too. It's a very nice location. Everyone who would like to visit if you are in Hamburg or its surroundings, it is publicly accessible. You can take a walk there. And there are these observation evenings. Just check the website. I don't know how things are regarding corona, but it's really worth a walk. Go there. Take a Sunday stroll. Note it. Yes, thank you. That's it for now.


Hey guys, Dylan Schumacher, Sivell Defense, and a couple days ago here in Minnesota, the Minnesota House passed bills HF-8 and HF-9. HF-8 is the universal gun transfer background check, universal, background universal gun registration, I don't know what you want to call it. And then HF-9 was of course the red flag law. So basically, HF-8, any time you need to transfer a gun, which means borrow a gun to a friend, sell a gun to a friend, family member, etc., you have to go to a federal firearms license, FFL, and you have to of course do a background check through them. I'm sure there will be a fee of some sort because the FFL needs to charge for their time and then you can go through the sale. The red flag checks, which are far more egregious than the background checks, are a law that if someone, really anyone as far as I can determine, thinks that you are a danger, they can go to court, get an injunction. An injunction is probably not the right legal term, but a court order against you without your knowledge and then you'll find out when the police show up at five in the morning to seize all of your guns and then you can have a chance to go to court and defend yourself after they've seized your property. It violates like six amendments. So it's a pretty atrocious and terrible law and of course the Democrats here in Minnesota were celebrating their victory and passing these laws and my representatives from my district in Minnesota are Democrats and so I'm on their email chain because they're my representatives and so I get their emails. You should sign up for your emails for whoever represents you in the government whether or not you agree with them. It's just a good idea to get their emails. Excuse me. So I saw this and saw this pass and watched the debate on the House floor as these laws passed and it occurred to me and something that I think I originally heard in the Atlantic which is no longer a good publication but was during the Obama years that the line that kept coming to my head is our civil liberties keep us safe. Everybody is talking about how these laws are going to make Minnesota more safer and how they're going to really help Minnesotans be safe and they're going to protect our kids in school and our kids have to do lockdown drills and how that's terrible and on and on and on and I have children who go to school and they do lockdown drills but you know what keeps my kids safe is their civil liberties both theirs and mine. That's why we have them is to keep us safe. I fear a government that is bloated beyond its business far more than I fear crazy people who want to do crazy things. Crazy people who want to do crazy things are part of the reason that I own firearms to begin with and that is what's going to keep my kids safe and that's what's going to keep my family safe and ultimately what's going to keep me safe is our civil liberties. So this idea that the best we can do to keep you safe is to restrict your civil liberties is asinine on the face of it when the very thing that does keep us safe are our civil liberties. If you don't believe me take a look at the 1960s and Mr. Martin Luther King and all those thousands of people who fought for their civil liberties to keep them safe. That's why we have them and they did that at great cost to themselves and put themselves in not safe things so that they could have those civil liberties. Our civil liberties keep us safe. I will say it until I am blue in this face and the idea that you can do anything else or that you can restrict those in order to keep me safe is completely insane. Do brave deeds and endure.


It is a cold January evening, and some 80,000 people have just watched a nail-biting football match. The nearly 88 minutes not much has happened, until an exciting goal, then an equalising goal in the last few minutes of play. The game is an old firm fixture, where Glasgow's two biggest teams face off. As such, it's always well attended, and rivalries between the two groups, or fans runs high. After the game, thousands look to make their way home. Some walk, others catch a bus, but a popular way home is via the Glasgow subway. To get to Copeland Road Station, football fans need to negotiate stairway 13. As the crowd is funneled down the stairway, a crush begins. Many are shuffled along by the way to the bodies. This is a common occurrence, but in the push someone loses their footing, then another and another. This triggers a chain reaction, as more and more people join the top of the stairway. An avalanche of bodies tumbled down the stairs. Many were tracked and couldn't move. When all is finished, 66 lives would be lost. Welcome to Plainly Difficult, my name is John, and today we're looking at the 1971 Ibrox disaster. Background Today our story starts in Glasgow, Scotland, but more specifically the suburb of Ibrox, located south of River Clyde, which is around here on a map. The suburb's name is derived from Scottish Gaelic, which roughly means Badger Den. Glasgow's history and by extension Ibrox's goes way back to before the 6th century, but we will fast forward to the 1800s for today's video at least. The Rangers football team in the late 1800s was ever increasingly in need of a permanent purpose built home. This resulted in the first Ibrox park completed in 1887, but it proved over the following 10 years to be nothing but a headache for a club. It was not the right size for the games the club wanted to host, and as such a new ground was planned. This would be the current day stadium site. Opened in 1899, it boasted the capacity of pretty much as many people as you can squeeze inside. This would lead to the first of the park's major disasters. It was three years after opening in 1902, where a wooden terrace would collapse killing 25. But we won't dwell on this too much as it's likely to be covered in another future video. However, this disaster resulted in the removal of the wooden terraces on the site of the east and west stands. These were later replaced by earthen mounds. By 1910, the capacity was officially at 63,000, and Scotland had found itself the home for three of the world's largest football grounds at the time. The park would continue to see redesigns and developments over its lifetime. The banking of the terraces increased. Now to get out of these terraces staircases were provided. These were steep and ran down the back of the terrace. You can see the western one here in this picture. There was also an eastern one around about here, which was called Stairway 13, but we will come back to this in a bit. Now in 1939, the stadium would see a pretty big crowd of nearly 130,000 people, one the largest in British history in a football stadium. Post-war, the stadium would receive flood lighting and coverings for the north and east terraces, which leads us to the 1960s. Stairway 13. The 1960s would be a deadly time for the park. The stadium had issues with herding fans off the site safely. You see Copeland Road subway station was right near the corner of the east stand. As such, it was a popular method of leaving the area post-match. The subway was pretty handy, running in a circle line throughout the city. You could in theory jump on any train regardless of the direction and eventually reach your destination. The subway also only had 15 stations after all. As such, heading for Copeland Road was a pretty popular way to get home. Because of this, the nearest exit to the station was number 13, and its associated stairway, which gained a name quite understandably, Stairway 13. After the final whistle blew, crowds would pour down the long and steep sets of stairs to exit 13. Lead us to say, this can be a recipe for disaster. If you've ever been in a big enough crowd before, it doesn't take much to get separated from the group, or even get pushed in the wrong direction. In 1963, concerns were raised over a number of incidents of overcrowding on Stairway 13. This was sparked off when, on the 16th of September 1961, two people were killed in a crush. The club installed safety measures, but two more crushes in 1967 and 1969 injured 8 and 26 people respectively. However, the club hadn't consulted any professional firms as to what safety precautions should have been taken. But this would just be the prelude to one of the worst accidents in British football history in the early 1970s. The Disaster It is the afternoon of the 2nd of January 1971, and some 80,000 people have piled into Ibrox Park to watch a favourite New Year's tradition, an old firm match. The range as the Celtic game kicks off, and for the most part, on this bitterly cold day with thick freezing fog, is rather uneventful. However, at the last minute, Celtic winger Jimmy Johnstone scored a seemingly winning goal. Looking like the match was lost, Rangers fans started to leave Ibrox. Many hoped to quickly get on the subway before the rest of the crowds piled out after the final whistle blow. But just seconds later in injury time, Rangers player Colin Stein scored equalising the game. With the final whistle now blown, the numbers leaving the stadium would increase significantly. From the East Stand, Stairway 13 was the obvious choice of egress, as hundreds crowded the stairway the usual crush developed. A couple of spectators lost their footing on the steps. Many fell, but numbers joining the staircase continued. This caused a cascade effect of more and more people falling over. One would later say, as we went down the stairs, what was apparent was that as we went down, our angle slowly progressed towards the horizontal, and I was quickly aware that we were falling. People who had fallen over on the lower stairs had more people fall on top of them, creating a crush several people deep. More and more people unaware of the crush below made their way onto the top of the stairway, adding to the weight of those who had lost their footing. As the weight mounted up on the fallen bodies, those underneath could not breathe. This created a condition called compressive asphyxia. This is a mechanical condition where expansion of the lungs is prevented by compressing the torso. This in turn restricts breathing, and thus causes death. Within just a few minutes, the pile of human bodies was up to six feet deep in some places. The victims couldn't escape due to the weight. Shouts came out from the crowd to stop pushing, but the flow of people was like an unstoppable wave. Eventually the flow was stemmed, and as people at the top of the crowd managed to free themselves, more and more of the trapped were also freed. Due to the crush, many of the injuries were related to restricted blood flow, internal bleeding and severe bruising from the sheer weight placed on their bodies. However, these would be considered the lucky ones. After some 45 minutes, the cries for help had been dulled. You see, because of the compressive nature of the disaster, some victims had been made unconscious, and many others had little air to shout out. Eventually, first responders, including ambulance workers and the police, managed to free some of the more trapped victims, taking them and laying them out on the pitch for medical care. Several lives were saved that evening on the picture eyebrows. But for 66, this would not be the case. All of the victims were under the age of 50. Half were under the age of 20. In addition to the deaths, there were over 200 injured. The disaster was over with, just a few hours after it had begun. But it had raised the question, how could this have happened? Just a few weeks after the disaster, starting on the 15th of February 1971, a fatal accident inquiry was held to investigate and officially determine the circumstances of the 66 deaths. The inquiry found some pretty worrying things about safety at Ibrox Park. The inquiry found that there was a grossly excessive crowd pressure present that lifted many victims off their feet, not allowing them the chance to select which of the seven lanes on the stairway to take. It was found that all on the stairway were travelling in the same direction, which stopped rumours of the crush being caused by fans going back into the stadium after the first goal. I also found that the regulation of crowds fell squarely at the feet of Rangers FC, due to Ibrox Park being private property. It was also found that the club's directors had not considered the safety of the park's stairways, which is pretty worrying due to the number of fatal and near fatal crushes on the site during the 1960s. Although damning of the club, the inquiry praised the first responders and the police, who acted as quickly as possible to try and rescue many of the injured. Another inquiry by Lord Wheatley was set to explore the ways to improve safety across the industry, more deeply than the fatal accident inquiry could have done in its seven days of hearing evidence. Wheatley were published as findings on the 3rd of May 1972, which would lead to legislation in the form of the Safety of Sports Grounds Act of 1975, which designated any sports ground with accommodation for more than 10,000 spectators, or more than 5,000 spectators for grounds hosting Premier League and English Football League matches, as requiring a safety certificate to admit spectators. A civil damages trial was raised at Glasgow Sheriff's Court in May 1974 by the widow of one of the Ibrox victims. The ruling, like the fatal accident inquiry, was damning for the football club, saying the accident was due to the fault and negligence of the defenders, Rangers FC. The site was extensively remodeled in the 1970s to encompass an all-seating capacity of 44,000, which would eventually be increased to 50,000. You see, reducing the number of occupants and making the site all-seating drastically helps with crowd management. But although the improvements were enacted, it would prove not to be the end of football match disasters in the UK. But this will probably be a story for another video. This is the Plain Difficult Production. All videos on the channel are creative commons attribution share alike licensed. Plain Difficult Videos are produced by me, John, in the currently windy corner of southern London, UK. I'd like to thank my Patreons and my YouTube members for your financial support, as well as all of you viewers for tuning in every week. If you want to see random photographs, I have Instagram and I also have Twitter, which is where I normally put up my hints for future videos. If you like this outro song that's playing right now, then feel free to go over to my second channel made by John, where you can watch the video in full. And all that's left to say, is MrMusic, play us out please.


official bunny call cover. I would make a video on this but it would be hard to because this cover is just way too different from things that we've seen before. Once the description is revealed I'll make a video on it. See you all very soon. Yeah that was a day ago. I did not expect the description to be released literally the next day. Hello people of the internet my name is johnny and we have some more book news the final fazbear flights book the cover for it and the description they've both been revealed so if you couldn't tell I literally just read off my community post that I made yesterday um showing off the cover and we're gonna be going into that in this video but the description is now out and I literally said I'm gonna wait till the description comes out to make a video on it but I didn't expect it to be this soon so uh yeah here we are but I'm actually going to start off with this with the description first because this cover is just really confusing some people are literally just saying it's a mix of music man and glitch trap which is completely the case let's be honest okay so I literally just hopped on to the reddit and this is the link that it took me to I don't know why the majority of the amazon page is not in english but the description is and that's all we really need when left in darkness rage festers years of frustration with his family culminate into a lonesome vacation for bob who plots a sinister prank to fryon his wife and kids matt redirects the residual anger over his many failed relationships into a video game and ends up birthing a horrible consequences the horrible consequences are bad in room 1280 of heracles hospital something evil is keeping a man alive a man with gruesome bones all over his body and an iron will to live and this fifth volume finance a phrase greatest got goth and yeah yeah yeah we've read all of that before okay so clearly since this is the final book in the entire series at least that is what we know so far as far as we know this is the final one maybe it's gonna go past five but for right now this is it they might do a whole nother series they may continue the series of fazbear fries i don't know but so far this is confirmed to be the final book in the in the in the fazbear fried series years of frustration with his family culminate into a lonesome vacation for bob who plots a sinister prank to friend his wife and kids okay so clearly this bob character is a husband he has wife and he has kids maybe it's here's the here's the thing about the books it's difficult to theorize about them this is another reason why i wanted to wait till the description was out because it's hard to theorize not only with just the cover but with the description themselves because if you guys haven't read um at least the first book because as of recording this it's there and went out even though some people have managed to get their hands on the second book fetch these books are very different to what we're used to the first book is unbelievably dark i was very surprised just how dark it is no spoilers for the for the books but it was very gruesome at some points um so yeah i'm interested to see if the rest of the series is going to be that gruesome anyways this bob guy he goes on a vacation with his wife and his kids and he tries to pull a sinister prank um and now we've we we've had the word sinister come up in a description before i can't remember which book though but it never turns out good so i'm guessing that the wife and kids will probably end up dying all right um that's my guess right now mad redirects the residual anger of his many failed relationships into a video game and ends up birthing the horrible consequences now this clearly seems like a direct reference to fnaf vr help wanted to wear um fazba entertainment hired a indie game developer um to make light uh not make light of but you know turn the motors of fazba entertainment into you know big game whatever you guys know what i'm talking about so maybe this is like maybe he's the indie game developer and in this whole situation he both's clutch trap i don't know it's just a theory guys and again it does say anger over his many failed relationships and as you guys know scott before fnaf he did create many failed video games fnaf was really the first one that really had a huge impact so again this could be a reference to um scott or it could be a reference to the canon indie game developer because scott is not the indie game developer in room 1280 of heracles hospital okay we've never ever heard of a hospital in the entire franchise so this is completely new um whether or not the room 1280 actually means anything maybe it's like the uh the shining room and it has some like dark backstory whatever something evil is keeping a man alive a man with a with gruesome bones all over his body and an iron will to live now i by the way when i've read that in this video that was my first time reading this description so all of these thoughts are completely new i've not read this um immediately of course i'm thinking of um william afton after most likely the fnaf 35 because after the fnaf 6 fire he's officially dead and he goes down to custom night to be tormented in hell forever i don't think he would go to a hospital though i don't see springtrap walking into a hospital and give an actual treatment from doctors but yeah iron will to live that could you know literally be iron metal endoskeleton but i feel like that's looking pretty far into it so um yeah you guys see why it's so difficult to uh theorize about these books because they're so so different from what we're used to you know anyways i'll think i'll leave it at that i read the description i gave my thoughts on it obviously like i just said these are all brand new thoughts i've not looked at this beforehand so maybe later on i'll come up with something i'll probably make a community post about it or i'll just like leave it in the comments of this video so yeah now we're going to move on to the cover of the book which is interesting i you guys have obviously uh seen it whether or not you've seen it in the uh reddit on the community post or just in the thumbnail but this is a very interesting cover so obviously with this cover you have the essentials you know from the number one new york time bestselling author scott carthen you know ellie cooper um andrea wagner you know all all those people of course got finna fads bear fright number five bunny call and then you've got the dude in the back again i said this at the beginning people are saying that this is a mix of music man and glitch trap obviously as a joke i don't think this is actually a mix of music man and glitch trap but i just find that funny so it's it's a toy bunny with a top hat and he is wearing a vest that is very similar to glitch trap i will say that he's also got the bow with the glitch trap um i don't i i don't think glitch trap had rosy cheeks he might have but i don't think he did and then obviously the um the symbols i really have no clue this is why i said i was gonna wait till the description came out because i have no clue what this can mean there are so many possibilities at least with the other covers we knew what they met you know uh into the pit we had spring barney and a ball pit uh fetch we had the dog and matronik um you know clearly reference to sparky and all that stuff um and then we had ella for the third book then we had foxy for the fourth book and then we're here with number five and it's just confusing really it's just really confusing i i don't know again there are many similarities to glitch trap from the vest the bow tie just the rabbit appearance um then again this this bunny is a bit more of a orangey hue than yellow and it again the rosy cheeks could mean that it's during the fun time era or the toy era i don't know also the the red and the blue in the background i just i just took note of that i don't exactly know what that could mean the first thing that came to my mind was the police um in which case yes please arrest this thing this is horrible i really don't know i really have no clue you guys can tell me what you think of this cover in the comments but as far as we know um usually all right usually the for the first story in the book is related to the cover and the first story in this book is uh is about bob pulling a prank on his wife and kids but he never says anything about a bunny maybe they're on vacation they go into this gift shop and they see this creature this you know this bunny he buys it for them and then he kills them with his with his symbols i don't know again i got nothing it's so different from anything that we've seen before which is why it's so difficult to explain all the stuff you know all right so i think i'm gonna leave the theorizing at that we've looked at the cover we've looked at the the description we've looked at everything there has to offer i will remind you that this book comes out on september first of this year so mark your calendars if you have not already and i'm pretty sure fetch comes out in like four days i think it comes out on march the thorns so uh yeah get that when it's out i still have yet to finish uh into the pit i will admit that i've been a little slow and by a little slow i mean i've not read it since like the beginning of January i will get back to it because i know i've promised a uh a review on it just like how i did a review on the graphic novel so i will definitely definitely get around to that before fetch comes out hopefully probably not though knowing me i'm very sorry very soon all right very very soon i promise in march you'll have a into the pit review and then hopefully i'll be able to get my hands on the fetch anyway so that is it for this update video i hope hopefully you guys enjoyed it you know there's been a lot of news recently you know with fnaf ar um in fact there's been a whole uh reddit post dedicated to february news which i've missed out on quite a bit so i think we're gonna have to do a another update video covering those things but that's another time so thanks for watching and i'll see you all on the flip side goodbye