We have to talk, and it's serious. I know we've been through so much together, so many great memories, but I think it's time that I move on, move on with my life to better things. And it really, it isn't you, it's me, and just where I am at in life right now. Don't, don't look at me like that. You knew this was gonna happen. And we still have the memories, you know, all the times that I got addicted to you. And just because we're breaking up doesn't mean you can't keep all of the stuff I bought for you, you know, all those weird accessories. I don't need them. You can feel free to keep all of those. You know, what about all those times you went outside together? That's how we went to the park. Yeah, yeah, we did have a lot of good times, but I mean, we had our fair share of bad experiences as well. You know, I'll never forget the first day I saw you. It was really, it was love at first sight. And you know, I don't know if I'll ever feel that way about anyone else, but you know, I've outgrown you. But it's time we said goodbye.  Yes, you can meet her. If you're not gonna be weird about it, okay? It's got a longer battery, that's why it lasts longer in bed. This was a really weird start to the video. And now, for the moment you've all been waiting for, a brand new switch. The only way I could really bring you guys into this experience with me is by doing my first ever unboxing video. And I've never, not having done one before, I'm really not sure how people set these up. I guess they just don't do their face on camera at the same time, but that felt weird for me. So you're gonna get this really awesome view of me opening the brand new Nintendo Switch while at the same time getting this less awesome view of my face with a big black bar in front of it. Let's go. I'm gonna do this pretty quick, give some opinions, some thoughts as I open it all. I'm very excited, but I'm also going to then go away and spend some time with the system and try and transfer everything from my old Switch to my new Switch and see how easy that process is in case any of you guys are wondering and then get back to you, which will be like instantaneous for you with how my experience went with it and the battery and all of that. I'm gonna try and make this as fun as possible. So let's just shut up and do it. I feel like I'm supposed to have a calm, relaxed voice while I do this. Kind of soothing, like Bob Ross ASMR. Oh yes, that is very new. I don't know what I'm doing. I'm surprised it wasn't like, I thought I'd have to stab something, but apparently it was already pre-stabbed. Oh man, I remember this, it was like three years ago. The only live stream I've ever left up on the channel was the live stream of me going and buying my Switch for the first time because one, it kind of became a moment in history, I guess, because I never anticipated my channel to take off and be so Switch themed after that moment. And I remember rushing home doing the speed limit, but rushing home and sitting on my bed in my old room in Canada. Technically, my Switch is a Canadian Switch, so it's nicer than other Switches. Oh, rushing home, opening it, Breath of the Wild, and it looked just like this. It's weird reliving this moment. I'm really excited. So my friend, Dreamcast guy actually has already opened one of these and the first thing he said was these Joy-Cons, they felt nicer. So he said that the plastic felt different. It does. It almost feels rougher, like not in a bad way. I don't really know how to explain it, but this feels like it has a gloss and this feels like it has a matte finish. That's how I would explain it. I can't visibly see a difference though. So something I'm gonna try and figure out for this video is how easy it is to transfer. Where is my actual Switch? All of my saves and data from this Switch onto this one so it can permanently replace it. And a couple of things I'm really excited about is this Switch, I can just take that Joy-Con off like that because the little connection thingy is broken and it's always annoyed me, but this is brand new, baby. This ain't going anywhere. I like that. Also, if you remember, I scratched my Switch a couple of times on the dock. Remember when that was an issue that no one talks about anymore, but it's still an issue, I think? I did scratch my screen. It's nice to not have to look at that, so I don't really notice it anymore, but it's nice that it's not gonna be there anymore. Other than that, obviously, they're going to look exactly the same. Again, if you're new around here and you didn't watch my last video, this isn't a new Switch. I mean, it is, it's a better revision, but it's not supposed to be that. It's not marketed that way. It's just when Nintendo were developing the Switch Lite, they made a new processor for it and they just decided to throw it in this Switch because it's better. And that processor is easier on battery life and apparently even makes the games look a little bit better. The resolutions are a little better now on this one. Again, it's not supposed to be an upgrade. You can go out. If you can afford to go out and buy it, sure, but you're essentially, you're buying exactly the same thing. It just has better battery life. I very much doubt we're gonna see any difference in resolution without actually doing a side-by-side. And I know I have other Switches sat here on my table. I've actually, I've been trying to buy broken Switches because I wanna build a new set. No, you don't. I wanna build a new set for my show and I wanna have Switches behind me and I don't wanna obviously put new expensive Switches behind me. So these are actually, I got these really cheap, broken. One's actually a demo unit that it just plays videos and won't actually play any games, but. So I'm gonna get rid of this thing. It's not here when I come back. And now I'm gonna try and figure out the transfer progress. What was he doing behind me? I did not turn that on. I literally turned the camera on and then it just turned itself on. I guess because I just put it on charge. The whole reason I just set this up was because I wanted, I realized I didn't capture the moment where I did actually turn it on for the first time. So that was very lucky that I, I don't know, you won't believe this. Or maybe you will. I don't know your life, but I moved down here and I put these Switches here and there was like a thing of soda here and my big freaking monkey hand just went and knocked it all over the two Switches, the new one and my old one. And you can kind of see this is all wet and soaked through. That's not lying. My Switches smell like soda now. My brand new Switch already smells like soda. This is why I can't have nice things. So annoyingly, the charge point is still on the bottom. I'm not sure if that's a good or bad thing. Right now, it's a bad thing. The Americas. I like how excited the noises get as you go through. They like get more and more excited. Oh, I can't show you my wifi, hold on. Okay, take your time. There we go.  Why does he transfer one user and all their saved data to a nearby console? Yeah, let's do that. I will say the one thing I'm worried about is losing my saves or just them not transferring properly or corrupting. If I lose my Fire Emblem save after almost 40 hours, I don't even want to think about it. Oh, and my Dragon Quest Builders save. Okay, this is just better work. It really hasn't been too bad. The new Switch had to update like two or three times but then it just asked me to log in and that's where I found an issue because I realized I have two accounts, my Australian and my American. So this so far it's been like 10 minutes and I've got 20 minutes left and I should have a brand new Switch ready to go with all my save files. The real test is gonna be if I can just load up Fire Emblem and gets to playing. Oh, while I'm waiting for this, I can actually, I could put on a screen protector. That's what I could do. The, it's broken. It's broken. What? That is so upsetting. That's the last time I buy one of those in the mail. I have to go back in the GameStop and get another one. Wow, that's upsetting. I'm gonna have to be real careful with my Switch tonight. Just as the ancient one foretold, it didn't really take like a minute to transfer the second profile because everything had already been transferred. So now both are on here. Setup is complete. So now we get the moment of truth. There's no way that it reinstalled everything in 20 minutes. There's no way. I know you probably can't see it but it's all blank. I'm gonna put in Fire Emblem and I guess it's gonna have to like re-download some stuff. But hopefully, by the way, this is the first game I'm putting in the new Switch. I don't know if that means anything. Download what it needs to and then I can pick right back up at my save. It's kind of annoying that everything isn't already downloaded. The next thing I have to check is I need to go to the eShop and make sure that I can re-download everything on my US profile. Yeah, all my save files. Cool. So it's just a matter of anytime I wanna play a game I'm gonna have to probably re-download all the updates and everything but I mean once it's done. One thing I'll say is when you're doing this it gave me an option of are you gonna be playing on your old Switch still or just on the new one? I would recommend probably doing I'm gonna be playing on both because it actually automatically erased the profiles off my old one. So yeah, if you wanna leave your profile on both systems, make sure you hit I'll still be using that old one. I think it's kind of rude that it deleted it because I mean it's still my old Switch. I still want my saves on it. Dragon Ball Fighters is 70% off right now. Okay, yeah, no, now I'm seeing some games that I have bought and they all say purchased. Yeah, Saturday morning RPG purchase, one strike purchase. Well, I think that's pretty much it. I should have every save file at least so I'm good to just start playing some games. I guess we'll cut back to upstairs for my final thoughts.  I've been gone barely 40 minutes. I was gonna spend some time with it, do some comparisons or resolutions and see how long the battery lasts. But then I realized that it is Saturday. I still gotta edit this video. It's getting kind of late. I'm really lazy, but also Dreamcast guy uploaded his video about it and it's pretty comprehensive and he's a really good friend of mine. So I'm gonna keep this video as just a cherished moment in time when I upgraded from my old Switch to my new one and you can go and watch his video if you want a more comprehensive look. Let's be real here, guys. If you're new here, subscribe. But if you've been here for a while, you'll know that I don't really get into nitty-gritty details about things.  But that was really easy. Like I am, I'm done. And I don't feel like I should be done already. I don't feel like it should be that easy to transfer things over. I'm a little disappointed that it didn't actually fully transfer everything over and I wanted to easily just go to my game library on this new one and just pick the ones I'm gonna play and start downloading them. But now I have to go to the eShop and manually find them. It's not too bad. I'm kind of a special case where I have so many games but I feel like for most consumers that have a reasonable amount of video games, less than an hour. And that's me taking my cameras around, setting all this stuff up and everything. It still took me like an hour to get up and running on this new bad boy. So for you, it should take even less than that. But for now, we have the Switch Lite coming on the 20th and we have this revision. That's not really a revision but it is technically a revision, getting rolled out to stores now. The way you can tell is obviously by this new red box which I really like. I mean, I don't really have a preference here at these two boxes but I think this one looks really neat. But that's gonna be your obvious tell. If you do wanna go out and buy one of these, it's the same price. So really, the only reason you should have to upgrade from the other Switch is if yours is broken or falling apart or the battery is shot or there's something wrong with it that makes you feel like you just need a new one, then you're in luck because the Switch is now a better. Or maybe you're someone like me who has a YouTube channel and if they make a video about it, they can claim it on tax. So I mean, why not? And I don't really know what to do with this guy. I mean, we've had so many memories together.  Like, it's a moment. And I'm the very sentimental guy and I do feel bad for this bad boy. These are my original Joy-Cons too. I just changed the shell, which was an experience that I also recorded. That video was a mess. But this is it, man. This little handheld bad boy is the reason that you guys are probably even watching this video right now. Screw this guy, man. I'm gonna keep, I'll just charge it more often. I'm done with that one. I can't let go of the past. Thanks for watching, guys. If you enjoyed this video, if you learned a little something, make sure you Sakurai Super Smash with that like button hair flip all over that subscribe button. New videos every single day on the Beat'em Ups channel is not something that I do. Rather, I put up videos whenever I dang well feel like it. So enjoy the next one. Bye.


This is a different background than I usually have and it's not totally balanced so I apologize I am in my office I'm in my office but I'm in my bed there's a nap bed in my office where I take my daily naps and I've been bed ridden for this is the third day because I have had a foot infection and it's getting better thankfully but I haven't been able to work at my desk and so this is a different video environment here I want to share with you kind of my reflections on on this experience of having an unexpected illness I guess or incapacitation to just do what my usual rhythms are and if you've seen my other videos about life monastery you know I'm trying to create and stay with a rhythm of spiritual practice throughout the day throughout the week and you know I had I feel like I just barely got started with that rhythm it's been maybe like two weeks of trial a lot of trial and error and experimentation and then this this sort of illness and you know it's it's quite a bit of effort each day just to hop around just to hop around in one foot trying to you know do my hygiene and get get get food and you know work from bed and what's natural what's the regular pattern it would be because my life monastery rhythms have not been instituted yet after years of practice it's very natural just to forget about it and I was you know the first day of my illness I looked back after the whole day I'm like did I do anything from my spiritual practice today barely anything when the second day I was a little bit more conscious and I started doing it a little bit and then this is the third day now and hopefully I will be more aware of my rhythm my spiritual rhythms as my foot gets better but I just think about it this and like I want to have a regular spiritual practice I but no one is going to force me to do it like no one's gonna I mean I live with my wife I wouldn't want her to you know nag at me and force me to do something that I in other words probably as you we want the freedom to be able to decide and do our spiritual practices without I mean I guess it's kind of funny I'm talking about life monastery because in in a real monastery you you purposely give up freedom so that you have external structure to do your spiritual practice and that again some people are called to that I'm not I'm a householder so-called which means I'm giving myself the freedom which also comes with I need to give my I need to create that structure so with the gift of freedom comes the opportunity the responsibility for me to create my own structure of spiritual practice no one else is coming to save me and so but that's true of life in general I mean most of you watching this probably all of you watching this are not living in the monastery and you are the creator of your own life this life in this earth I'm not saying you're the creator of all universe but you are certainly in this incarnation in this moment you've been given the freedom to make tons of mistakes to not do the right thing or to do the right thing whatever the right thing means for you at the moment your conscience you know you align with that but it's such it's always so surprising to me and I always have to remind myself that the silence of life when we do it's like sure our conscience might come in but but so many of us have learned to ignore our conscience or to be overburdened by our conscience but it's like the larger silence of life though no one's telling you what to do you can listen to teachers you can listen to mentors but they're just one small voice in your life I mean you can make their voice large in your life if you want to but the more responsibility you take for your life the more you realize there's a giant silence in life giant silence of God is not speaking down from the skies in a megaphone saying now you will do this now you will do that God's always really the it's so funny I feel like the more people are connected to spirit the more I don't know I feel like sure some people might you know be channelers and they are deep divinely connected and it's like there's a microphone in their head from from God saying you should do this or from their angel guides or whatever I find it to be the opposite the more I've matured the more I've matured the more you know they call it the still small voice it's like the more the whisperer gets softer because the more I've been given the freedom and the sovereignty to do what is whatever it is I get to determine what's right and wrong the more I matured the more I've realized this no one else can determine for me what's right and wrong like I said yes there is God and yes the as we connect to divine source we might hear some guidance but my feeling about it is that God wants us to become adults and to decide for ourselves what is right and wrong and to suffer the consequences or to enjoy the consequences to understand the ripple effects of our actions and of our thoughts so once again I'm back to my bedridden rhythm where I can decide to practice my spirituality or not the unexpected will always come if we can expect anything in life it's there will be unexpected times and so for those of us who want to practice our spirituality regularly back to this idea you are the creator of your life no one is coming to save you no one's God's not going to use a big microphone and if God does use a big microphone it's because you really are struggling and you need a lot of help fine you God might use the microphone through other people they might give you an intervention but the more we mature the less interventions people need to give to us and so same with God the less God needs to intervene and say well now you got to create the structure I'm gonna create the structure for you because you can't do it on your own but the more we mature the more we want to be a creator of our life the more we want to rise up to be a leader in life then the more we have to decide well when the unexpected comes will we still create follow a rhythm because no one's gonna do it for us and the last thing I'll say is this the rhythm or your spiritual practice is always there available for you and we can always ease into it without a lot of you know flailing around or whatever like for example I can always come back to my energy reboot it only needs to take 20 seconds it's so gentle it's so simple and yet when I come back to it I've reminded it yet again of the deeper what I believe is a deeper truth of existence and what this is all about and so come back again and again and again to your spiritual practice because you are the creator of this life you get to determine your structures you get to determine how much you grow thanks for watching


If you've seen Old D'Eller, you know the devastating effects that rabies can have. Rabies is commonly transferred between animals and humans when an infected animal bites a person. Domestic and wild animals can transfer the disease. Dogs, cats, skunks, foxes, raccoons and bats are common animals that harbor rabies. Animals suspected of exhibiting rabies can be confirmed for the virus from a test called immunofluorescence, which analyzes brain tissues. Treatment for the disease requires a series of preventative vaccines immediately following contact with the animal. It is important to seek medical attention immediately and gain as much information on the animal as possible. Symptoms include loss of muscle function and feeling, convulsions, drooling, pain at the site of the bite, and trouble swallowing. Once symptoms occur, treatment strategies drastically decrease in effectiveness. Ways to prevent rabies include using caution around unknown pets in wildlife, vaccinating your pets, and avoiding wildlife in areas where rabies could be present. From the University of Wyoming Extension, I'm Blake Hotman, Exploring the Nature of Wyoming.


we'll have another panel session. But just before we do, I think we have our final poll of the day to run, John. Is that right? Yes, indeed. I'm just setting it up now. Thank you. So looking under the polling tab there, question on reference architecture, which of the following is true, A, B, C, or D, or all of the above or none of the above. Reference architectures are, it's interesting. I would say inside the open group over the last decade, pretty much, being more and more interest and more and more of our forums have been interested in developing reference architectures. Because as I've said several times, it seems to be that one of the beauties of Togaf is that it's applicable across all industries, all technologies, all types of organizations. But obviously a logical next step is that the individual industries want to look at the specific environments that they operate in or any additional or requirements or legislation and dive into kind of a next level of detail on architecture. And that's where the reference architectures can be so useful. And we've seen those in our work in federal aviation and we've seen it with the open process automation forum and military sensors and most recently with the open subsurface data universe work. And IT for IT, of course, which we'll hear a lot more about tomorrow. That's a reference architecture for running the business of IT so far. But the next version is very much focused on the digital product and digital product management included in there. So reference architectures we've seen as very key. So I'll be very interested in how this poll goes. So while that is ongoing, welcome back to Palab and Hanny. Thank you for your thoughts earlier and we have one. And welcome back also to Sonja, who I can't quite see Sonja, but I'm sure you're there. I know you're there. And now I can see it. Great. Okay, so let's kick off. If you have questions, folks, as a reminder, please put them in the Q&A section in the WebEx platform. So the first one to come in was maybe I'll aim this at you, Hanny, if I may, at least to start off, the sustainability, the SDGs that you spoke about and you listed, do the numbers represent a prioritization? I know you mentioned that they're kind of interconnected in many ways, but do the numbers represent a prioritization of any kind or how did the numbers come about? Actually, it's a very simple answer, not at all. Actually, the guys who designed the SDG logo, they have made it in a circle because two things, there is no order and everything is interrelated. So the quick question is no, everything is important, providing that it matches with the country priorities and the country context. Right. Okay. Good to know that. Good to know that. Thank you. And a specific one of those, one of the challenges, how do you deal with challenge number five? How do you overcome challenge number five? I don't know if there can be a reminder of challenge number five. So Steve, let me take this. Yeah, please do. Yeah, because the challenge number five, if I'm not mistaken, was the countries with limited resources. Typically they have multiple initiatives which are driven more by external push and it does not sustain. So yes, it's a good challenge for us to look at because the question is how do you deal with that? So one thing that we're looking at, if you see one of the slides that honey presented at the lower end, it is the attitudes and capabilities. So one way we look to address that is to kind of address the capability gaps that exist in these countries through the, you know, making the body of knowledge accessible to these countries and also coming up with, for instance, a big capability framework and a plan which kind of gets augmented by training at different levels. So there are many ways to do this. But the intent of what we're trying to address here is that the, you know, for digital government initiatives to sustain beyond after the external consultants have left, it's important that the internal staff of the governments are competent enough to continue this and take it forward as Honey was saying in one of the examples that even though the digital services are available, sometimes citizens don't use it for various reasons, which could be because of the capability, which also could be because of the social and cultural barriers, which in fact is the another another factor, which we are trying to address. Right. Okay, that's that's great. Thank you. Thank you. This one is for Juan. Juan, you mentioned moving from interoperability to integration. Could you explain why it's desirable to do that? Okay, I think I mentioned that when I'm talking about digital services. So when we have an interoperative platform that was established, it has more than 10 years and with 250 services were services that are published and almost 100 stations connected to the platform. But when we start to digitalize our digital service, we want to focus on the users because most of the digital service or the services that we want to digitalize were designed by the public agency organization thinking in the needs and not in the user or citizen needs. So we want to integrate these digital services and not only the exchange of information when the public organization needs. So we have to have a view of the whole of the government and think if it's necessary to have two digital services in different public agencies or to integrate in one digital service, we focus on the citizen. Right. Okay. Thank you very much. Next question. I'm going to combine two questions here, I guess. One is specifically about, let's see, where do we go? If you don't have the opportunity to work as an enterprise architect, specifically any government, how would you suggest I could still be part of the project coupled with a more general question, which is how do I become part of the project? And sorry, the project being the workgroup, the government enterprise architecture workgroup, that's the context. So anyone want to take that? Either maybe Palab or? Yeah. So I don't know if I hope I've understood the question if we don't have the opportunity to work as an EA. Yeah. So I'm assuming that even if you don't have the opportunity to work as an EA, you have some knowledge of EA as a discipline. And obviously, it is always helpful if you have experience in the government domain. I know that there are a lot of people here who may come from other industry. One way to get involved in the project, one way of course, which is the more natural way is that the organization that you work for would become a member of the open group. That's of course, the more natural way of logical way of doing it. The other way is that we will make all our work products deliverables of work products that come out of the workgroup available in draft format. They're going to be made available. So you could even act as a reviewer and contribute to it in an individual manner, so to speak. I'm assuming that you want to contribute in an individual manner here. So that's possible. So these are the two ways to get involved in the workgroup, so to speak. Great. Thank you, Pa. This one, several of you may have a view on, but I'll start with you, Sonia, I think. What's the difference between a reference architecture and a baseline architecture? I think the main difference like the baseline architecture is that you're the point of start, you know, you start defining what you have in your organization, and then depending on the approach, you may decide to either make your own architecture, meaning not use it in a reference architecture, or may choose to use one to, for example, provide more facilities about integration, interpretability, and reuse of the assets. So the difference is that the baseline architecture is your current state, and the reference architect is what you use is going to be common into a target state. However, they can be combined as one. So for example, there are cases in which you already have your architecture, even though it's not described, and this is very common, for example, when you're going to implement a system that is already built, you need to adapt with a reference architecture that is already there. So it depends on how the approach is, but I think the main difference is that usually the reference architecture, like I explained our panel of presenters today, is to favor reuse and best practices, and to avoid like starting from zero. So you reuse that, and depending on the sector that you are, we have different reference architecture. There are some of them are for finance, for government, for telcos. So some of them are general. Some models are more specifics. For example, if you go back to the Togov Enterprise continuum, you may go all the way from the very general foundation architecture, for example, the Togov standard, all the way to a very specific architecture, which is, by the way, one of the questions in the poll. What's the value of a reference architecture if at the end you need to deliver value based on your own architecture? So this is the difference between the two of them. Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. Anything to add to that? Any of the other panelists in a government context, or I think it's a good explanation, Sonia? Yeah. Okay. Good. Okay. So I think maybe I can come to you on this one, honey, because I think you mentioned it in your words, and it's around, let me see here. Yes. Has there been any interest in countries in regionalising their digital services? Palab, I know that you put an answer in the Q&A, a written answer in there, in saying, yes, there is. And specifically, there's a follow-up question from the same person. Has there been interest by countries in Africa? So perhaps you could speak to the more general and then African countries, perhaps. Maybe let me contribute to this. There has been some, a number of initiatives actually at different levels to kind of try to harmonise and to regionalise some of the digital service-related activities, particularly on the regulatory front. I mean, we have seen, for example, in Africa, a number of sub-regions, whether in West Africa, East Africa, South Africa, there has been some efforts indeed to kind of harmonise some of the regulatory frameworks, try to come up with model laws, try to come up with some regional electronic acts. However, even smart Africa, I think, that have been also trying to come up with some regional initiatives around digital identity, for example. However, there are a number of kind of challenges when it comes to the adoption of countries. Some of the regional frameworks that has been only one country kind of adopting it. So it's not an easy thing, though as I mentioned in my brief intro, there is a lot of good reasons why you should adopt regional approaches. However, practically speaking, there are a lot of challenges as well. You know, in many countries, even there are some political conflicts and if not, almost like armed conflict between countries, neighbouring countries. So it's extremely difficult, particularly that countries are extremely cautious and about their sovereignty, data sovereignty particularly. So in order to break those types of country barriers and to regionalise, there is a more and more, I would say, awareness from the development partners. You know, if you talk out to the World Bank, to ITU, to the EU, the European Commission, I think everyone is realising that we need to work through regional initiatives and actually we are as ITU and with others involved already in a regional initiative around digital government in East Africa. To what extent you can really have shared infrastructure among different countries, it's not necessarily easy to do. However, you can still do some kind of develop some regional frameworks that countries can kind of adopt and customize instead of trying to reinvent the wheel or try to develop something from scratch. So I think if you think of regionalising, there are different levels of, you know, how can you do things? You can just develop a framework at a regional level, you can try to implement it at a regional level, you can try to have data hosting at a regional level. So there are different levels and there is a very strong also reason why we do that for this concept of single digital market, really to expand as a digital market to reach economies of scale, because as I mentioned, this is another big problem in those countries. So while there is a lot of good reasons why you would want to go regional to kind of, you know, mutualize investments and reduce the investment, increase the impact and return on your investments, there are a lot of hurdles actually to make it really happen on reality. Right, yeah. Yes, no, and there's a comment came in on the chat that obviously Africa is a vast region as we know and you talked about the, you know, approaching it on a regional basis maybe, you know, East Africa, West Africa, South Africa, but even that can be challenging and we see that with standards in general, you know, there are national standards and international standards and frameworks that get picked up to different degrees, but it's very difficult to to share things as important as your digital services or even your infrastructure when maybe all is either not well between nations in the region or there are other factors, just logistics and financial and, you know, economic factors, it's a challenge, but the positives are there as you say. So next one, could you say a little more about the roadmap or what you see as the low hanging fruit in the areas that the working group will tackle? Okay, let me take this. So what we have done is, as I told you, we have the work group has had a few meetings in the past three months and as a team, we have identified three, four priority areas and somewhere alluded to already by honey. So we have three subgroups as of now, you know, which kind of represent the areas that members want to take on in terms of the immediate priority. One is capacity building and competency and which comes back to the question which I answered earlier, how do you deal with ensuring that the digital government architecture is a sustained initiative. So the member, the work group members felt that capacity building and the competency framework is important. So that's one area that we have identified as a low hanging fruit, so to speak. Second is to create a guide for digital government strategy. As honey did mention that many of the countries already have a strategy guide in strategy in place, so to speak, but the problem happens in execution of that strategy. So our focus is getting to a point where, you know, you just kind of assume that the country has access to a strategy based on whatever internal capabilities they have, but how do you execute that strategy. So we are getting to getting to having another subgroup, which focuses on implementing the strategy and what guidance countries need. So that's the second priority area and that will touch many sub areas within that. And the third one is which we have identified is a collection of case studies. So for instance, currently we have within that subgroup of case studies, we have one case study coming up from the Czech Republic. Another one is from Spain and the third one is from Canada. Okay, you can see that we're obviously, you know, we obviously there are going to be case studies from other countries. For instance, India can be included there. We have Bangladesh, which has also been one of the countries which has adopted digital government architecture. So there are many countries, we have Bhutan also, you know, we are interacting with, yeah, so absolutely. So we think that these are the three key areas that we are trying to tackle. And in the slide that honey presented, you saw the 10 factors, there are other factors which are equally important. So one area, which I personally, because I have worked in this domain, which I personally feel is very important is to help countries in their procurement and vendor management, because this becomes a major issue for e-government or digital government, you know, initiatives, so to speak. So it would be good for us to have, for instance, another parallel subgroup to look at procurement and provide some kind of a, if I may use the word like a model RFP, like a template RFP that can be taken up because these countries need a lot of guidance and they are completely dependent on external resources to make this happen. So I think, you know, with that, I've given you a summary of what we are working on. And as I said, the opportunities are huge, they are limitless. So we have just touched on some of the surface areas and we really would like to dig deeper and help the countries that we are trying to target. Absolutely. And to do that, it's good to have more people involved and doing some of the work. Thank you. Question for Juan, you mentioned an open data initiative. Now, data is obviously very important nowadays, new oil or new gold, however you want to describe it. Could you say a little more about that open data initiative? In your guide, please. Yes, first, we have a special group here in Agassiz that works with open data. We have an open data strategy that we built and we have the catalog with open data, we have some many principles that give for the organizations and to develop of the different systems with data open by default and all other principles related to data protection. So we are working with organizations to develop different observatories for the citizens, publish the data, we have a little framework that mandatory have to, the organization have to promote and publish their budget in the website, the structure and some kind of of measurement and accomplishment of the objective they have to achieve. So I'm not the expert of this topic, but we'll cover a little bit of experience of working with open data. Thank you. Thank you. And I think at this point, Sonia, do you want to look at the last poll result? Would that be? Okay, I think let me see. I have the results in here, just let me put them bigger so I can look at them better. So yes, actually interesting results from the poll. First, the first question was reference architecture are important to accelerate and support business transformation. We have 13% of the people saying that it is important. Then reference architecture are one of the key components while delivering your architecture landscape, 13%, but our standard will be improved if more reference architectures are included. We have a 7% people saying that and the value of reference architectures is relative since at the end, organization need to deliver their specific architecture. Sorry, that's one, this is the one that has 7%. Actually, the need to have reference architectures in TOGAP standard is 10%. And the last one, all of the above, so 18% of the people believe that there is value in reference architecture. So we can see there's a trend of people saying that actually, there's value in reference architecture. And even though some organizations prefer to have their own architectures, specific organizations or architectures still having a reference more general one is valuable. And also again, similar to the other polls that we saw in the previous panel, 60% of the people didn't respond. So that gives us again an idea that we need to do more in this phase. So having these kind of testimonials, like for example, the ASIC and the A government one are good ones. Actually, important to mention that we have several reference architecture works in the open group. We have the commercial aviation, which is a working group interactive forum, the healthcare forum, also a reference architecture. We have a very interesting publications into the architecture and archemy forums about the buy-in reference models and the financial industry. And we have also a webinar in the case study that ASIC has shared in the past with us about their work. So it's interesting to follow up now that they are going more into digital space. So there are a lot of information, very valuable information that you can find in the open group library that will help you understand more the value of reference architecture. Of course, we identified with this that we need to do more. And actually, there are a couple of active groups now and the liberals that are in progress into the architecture forum that are around business architecture and business models for the digital enterprise as well. So stay tuned and follow up also our library because you will understand valuable information and find valuable information about this in the open group library as well. Well said. Thank you, Sonja. Thank you. And we will leave it there for the panel. We're right on time. Thank you for enabling that or facilitating that. And so a big thank you to Juan and Palab and Hani and Sonja. So thank you very much. Bye. Take care. Bye. So that's about it for today. Just a few closing points. Thank you all for your attention and participation and the great questions. Thank you to all of our speakers. As I said at the beginning, it's always good for us to hear through the questions and the chat and any other ways that you might be able to get in touch with us. What's on your mind as far as the TOGAP standard is concerned and some are other standards that play to it. And on that point, a plug for tomorrow's event, hopefully some of you will be able to join us on that tomorrow. We've got Digital Professionals Day tomorrow. So we'll be looking at some of the standards that are key in enabling and facilitating the tools that you might use in your digital transformation journeys inside your organization. So we're looking at new operating models, digital product management, emerging roles in a digital operating model, product centric technology operating models. There's some of the themes for the presentations tomorrow and some really good case studies. A lot of fun actually. It will be turning one of our forums, the IT for IT forum, has been working on a novel to set, basically make it a very approachable way of describing a case study in a fictional organization of their digital transformation journey and using some of the open group standards. That will be nice to hear from that tomorrow. So hopefully you can join us for that. If you haven't registered, it's not too late. A reminder, because we do get the question regularly, the presentations will be available usually the Wednesday after the event week. So a week tomorrow they will be available with recordings when they are post-production and we'll make those available to you all. If you are registered, attendee of the event, you will get an email telling you when they are available. So you'll be able to look at those in your in your own time and we'll obviously make sure that the video that Ben was running earlier will be able to be included in that as well as the one that one has. So that's it. Thank you for your attention. Steve, can I just interject for one moment? I would just want to make sure that people understand that the proceedings will be available but sometimes post-production takes a bit longer. So we can't guarantee that that will be available by next Wednesday but it will be available. That's a good clarification, Maggie. Thank you. Yes, the materials you will get next Wednesday and their post-production will be as soon as we can get it done but it'll give you the chance to either look at it again or look at the parts that you were unable to be part of and you'll get those for all three days but do join us live tomorrow and if you possibly can and hope that you found today valuable. We'll leave the meeting open and the chat channel going for anyone who wants to say hello to anyone else that may be attending or give us any feedback. It's been a pleasure having you all here today and take care, enjoy the rest of your days or nights as appropriate and see as many of you as we can tomorrow. Thank you for your participation. Bye-bye. Thank you, Steve. We're just going to run the open group information video now for about five minutes whilst people are finishing their chats and then we'll be closing down the session for today. So thank you all for attending.


Hello and welcome to the Indian Cultural Forum. Today we have with us a much loved stand-up comedy artist, Aditya Mithal. Welcome to Indian Cultural Forum, Aditya. The context in which we are talking is unfortunately quite distressing, which is that of the arrest, the attack on and the subsequent arrest and denial of bail to Munnavar Farukhi who was performing in Indore and it was alleged that his act was offensive to Hindu gods. What is your opinion on this whole event? In the running scheme of things as they have been going for the past few years, this is not entirely surprising. It only has an added element of, I guess fear and apprehension because Munnavar belongs to a minority community and several comedians of majority communities have engaged with and been pinpointed for being sort of cracking jokes that might be considered of color to certain communities. But it has never come to this and the constant denial of bail is what is the thing to watch out for because that is different from what has happened to any other comedian in the past. You know, in the context of comedy, jokes or humor, there's often this idea that there's a fine line between what is funny and what is offensive and some of it is indeed valid because we know as women how sexist jokes have been around for as long as one can remember. In this context, how do we tread that terrain and how does one negotiate this idea of the offensive? I feel like the discussion about what the fine line is is almost disingenuous in this case in particular because this is so blatantly an anti-Muslim move. There is from the proof that has been submitted in this particular case, there seems to be nothing out in the public eye to show that Munawar has been offensive to the 80s and the videos relating can be sort of construed. And so this is sort of, and I think I have to double down on that, is that this is an anti-Muslim and anti-minority move and comedy is just sort of the garb in which it is being wrapped up right now. And because as you very clearly said that comedy is something that, and I mean, this is sort of stems from my personal beliefs as well, so if anyone else doesn't agree, that's, you know, of course, totally free to disagree on one. But I realize that comedy and what entails comedy is the opposite side of every other coin, whether it's fear, whether it's sadness, you know, it's sort of the other end of the spectrum. That's what tragedy plus time is equal to comedy. And that's what it is, is the addition of time to anything can be used comedically. And since we are talking about the Munawar Paruki case in particular, Munawar was a victim in the Gujarat riots. He mentions in his stand-up as well, and he mentioned in some of the videos that are circulating off the show, the offending show, where he mentions that his own house was burnt down in the Gujarat riots as someone who has had to have their life appended by this public incident. Why shouldn't he have the right to speak about it? Because I've been doing this for 10 years now and I think I was also, I started out doing it in a time where it wasn't as precarious as it is. I was always of the belief that if you want to find out if something is palatable or not, you have to first say it out loud.  And so you have to say it out loud in front of somebody in order to gauge their reaction, which is why stand-up is also considered a slightly high-risk profession, especially for women, where sort of the social constructs of what you can and cannot say and how you should and should not project yourself are so wide and so all-encompassing. Stand-up comedy has been considered slightly a more high-risk profession and because you have to say it in order to find out whether it's going to offend someone or not or it's going to make someone laugh or not. And it of course varies greatly from room to room. In the case of Munawar, we saw that his audience was like, you know, what we get when he's coming from. Whereas it was just these three people or these four people who were really offended by it and had come pre-planned that we don't even care what he said, we are going to be offended by it. So in that case, there is nothing that Munawar could have done. There is nothing he could have done that would have made the line or tore the line or been able to gauge a room or anything. And I'm thinking how laughter can go both ways, right? On the one hand, it has the potential of just reinforcing some of the existing values and traditions. On the other hand, it can very productively question and critique. And I want to ask you what your thoughts are and why do you think there's so much, you know, why has laughter suddenly become so threatening to the present regime? Why does laughter can hurt someone? Because there is nothing you can do in response to someone laughing at you.  Your job now is to come up with a better joke so that everyone laughs at that person who just laughed at you. But not too many people are equipped with that skill and or that kind of presence of mind. And that is why, because it is not a physical assault. It is not, you know, it's even to a very large extent on the kind of humor it is. It might not even be ideological. Because I think that when someone laughs at you, there is really no response you can give and that really irks people in power. I do believe that, you know, a group of people sitting and laughing at something together is a sign of solidarity. And I mean, you know, when the oppressed take that one moment, even in the situation that they are in to have a laugh, they almost seem defiant and defiance. Very much annoys the oppressor. It very much annoys the oppressor because it makes them feel like they haven't done enough to crush the spirit of someone.   And I really hope that, you know, fingers crossed as soon as he's out of this. I hope he gets a much larger following and I hope that a lot more people listen and, you know, a rising tide will lift all boats. I really hope so. Well, thank you so much Aditi for being with us today and speaking with such courage and clarity about the situation. We really hope Munawar walks out and free soon and gets to celebrate all this solidarity that he has received in this time.


Thank you all very much. I want to follow up the last presentation with setting the stage of how all of the networking open source projects are coming together inside the Linux Foundation and how this affects how we end up in a containerized world. And so what I want to start with is reminding everyone all that had to be invented over the last seven years as the networking industry has come into open source. What was just discussed in direct use cases really was this orange bubble from service orchestration and SDN to virtualize networking. All of SDN can be really defined by that one word that says programmability between the two. And that is something that has taken years and years for the networking industry to build in open source and standardize. Also moving forward from there, the incorporation of analytics and data lakes, which is now available inside the Linux Foundation, has come out of this. But in addition where the industry is going is adding a policy layer and then a platform for the applications, including bringing all of these networking services into Cloud Foundry. So let's step through this a bit. The original notion of software-defined networking, which really focused just on config and provisioning, was far too simplistic for what we really needed to do in the network. And we realized that there was no notion of resource management, no notion of endpoints or computers involved in this, and creating virtual overlays is necessary but not sufficient for what we need to do in the network. So what we needed to add and what has been added through a project called panda.io was this analytics framework to take the telemetry and data coming out of compute, network storage and security, bring this into a data lake, which those events could then be correlated to trigger other events inside the SDN world. And so really what this comes down to is that all of operational state of networking and of compute had to change. And you've seen this with the change away from legacy polling mechanisms inside networking to the pushing of this data in real time directly into that data lake. And in sum, that's what the networking industry refers to as telemetry. This catalyzed the panda.io organization and community inside the Linux foundation. And that is now a project with an OPNFV and soon to be a project with an ONAP and that orchestration piece and I'll show you that shortly. But what's interesting is that software defined networking is bigger than config and provisioning and bigger than data analytics itself. It has to have end to end resource management. And the point really is, is that today in scheduler frameworks and orchestration frameworks at best, we can perform compute and storage scheduling, but there's no optimization of that scheduling for compute networking and storage. And so for that effective service placement or effective container placement or effective hypervisor placement, these pieces need to be optimized together and it's been impossible to date to do that. So what we've done on top of panda is use machine learning algorithms. But instead of just talking about the type of models that are used, what we've realized is mechanistic models of the network of compute, of storage and security are impossible to create with any accuracy. And so this is how stochastic and differential machine learning algorithms which are observing and analyzing how the relationship of the applications are occurring and including traffic aware awareness into the analytics is optimizing that the placement of those workloads and we're seeing up to 30% gain of the efficiency of the data center equipment, whether it's in a court architecture or an enterprise application architecture based upon that learned placement optimization by looking at compute networking and storage together. But also what's interesting is that creating an SDN controlled network, getting the data out of the network, creating a feedback loop between these pieces is what's been worked on over the last couple of years, but that still doesn't build the service that's necessary. What's missing is identity and the policy to drive the micro segmentation and the service chains to be created inside that data center or inside that court architecture that we just heard about. And so using identity as an input variable is now one of the newest things that's been added into this orchestration architecture and is a part of the own app architecture at the Linux foundation. Really the identity is not necessarily just trying to focus on are we using a certain address for the device or its cellular identifier or its IP address, but really it's a multi variant normalization of user devices, geolocation, network topology location, time of day, et cetera, that come together to define the identity of that user, that application. When you have identity and can add this into it, you can then start to orchestrate the micro segments from a wireless access point or from a data center interconnect router. The microservices across that network linked to a specific service chain for all the devices associated with a particular user. In the networking world, there's been a large conversation about the use of micro segmentation across the WAN, across the EDGE, and in the data center, but without identity there's nothing to drive the linkage of a user to the applications or a user to those services except for IT and direct operator and administrator control. By adding in identity and policy, you can now create a much larger self driving system. So this also is what's believed to be the path using OpenID, an open source community and open source project in community, linking that into the orchestration framework is how we can rapidly onboard the internet of things, all those devices that are going to be attached to the network without requiring other user onboarding and allowing for automatic bootstrapping of the system itself. That by understanding the device and its role in the network, the security micro segments or the security policy can be directly applied to those devices. To bind these together, the emergence of a policy engine needs to occur. Many policy engines exist in the network today, but none of them on top of an SDN orchestrated control. And really what this means is that as there is an enterprise IT function and as devices and users are onboarded onto the network, then the policy can be pushed into the SDN controller and into the network and into the application services themselves. This also ends up driving the analytics to be associated with the policy of course and with the user and the binding of these pieces together. This block has just emerged on app inside the Linux foundation as well, but again overall driving the network services and application placement doesn't exist yet. What you can get when you do this ends up becoming all new ways of orchestrating a network and orchestrating the services on the network. So you're able to see when associating users, network, stored objects and applications are actually security violations if an individual is not supposed to be able to decrypt a critical financial document in this case. And so what this turns into is in fact a policy language that can be written in human readable form as you can see here where the finance team can only access secure documents when on campus. In previous incarnations of SDN and networking this is all done through address management. Now it can be done through binding and onboarding of the users, onboarding of the documents or of applications or of services themselves and lending itself towards again a human readable way of expressing what you want to have happen on the network. So when we take a look again at this wheel of what has to be invented and what has been invented, we've done well with SDN, orchestration is emerging, virtual networking with fd.io or FIDO is there, analytics has come through and the policy management for resource allocation and optimization and binding of identity is what's emerging next in the networking side of the Linux foundation and orchestration. So changing topics a bit, the previous talk and what you've seen inside the Linux foundation to date has been all about the orchestration of hypervisors and in some cases bare metal as well. But as we know containerized services are rapidly emerging in the industry, it allows towards optimal componentization and breaking up of the application suite but it leads itself towards very large challenges in the networking world and I want to discuss with those with you next. So as has been discussed in the industry, the changing development process, application architecture, deployment and packaging and the infrastructure around it has changed really completely in the industry and everyone in the room is well aware of this and in particular all the way from trying to do DevOps work all the way into a notion of serverless computing and for me that would be edge computing, fog computing or use of very, very large data centers. But what this looks like when looking at the networking side of it is in fact a very, very diverse set of communication that does not look like a service chain. It looks like full communication, full mesh communication between containers and expressing the networking policy for containers in a traditional service chain architecture will not work and so there is a massive amount of work that needs to be created inside the cloud networking foundation, inside Kubernetes, inside networking domains as well so it can be expressed all the way to the pass layer in communities like cloud foundry. So my point here is really that the way that the networking world has viewed creating networking services and virtualized network functions is really directly analogous to a three tiered application architecture where a service chain is created, hypervisors are launched and policies are placed in between those. That's a classic three tier architecture but that three tier architecture just doesn't work in a mesh like this. And so stepping this forward we have to remember that policy binds identity to those services and what's really changing in the stack is that as applications are being launched the rules of the policy need to be pushed with intent into the stack itself versus having the infrastructure hold the policy and applications are placed into it. As easy as that is for me to say that is a fundamentally different mode of building a stack than we've done in the networking world and in the infrastructure world and that becomes that itself is the challenge. And so to create this application control during application composition as we know with the OCI framework you start describing the application and the rules necessary for that application that becomes a policy source of when you go to launch or execute those containers the rules flow into it and I'll describe this a bit more in the stack in just a second. But the fundamental change of the application has metadata and rules associated with it to be driven with intent into the infrastructure is a fundamentally different architecture than the service chain that I just showed. So what are we doing about this? Inside the Linux Foundation there are a number of projects as you can see really that have emerged very recently at the different layers of the stack as they as they look in an IT infrastructure stack from orchestrating configuring the hardware all the way up to the PAS layer with cloud foundry and this is one way of representing how those projects come together. When we take a look at this with one particular use case and instead of looking at the mobility cord case I'm actually showing here a video workload or video service case we have to realize that the stacks on the previous slide that get built out actually get directly represented just written a little differently into this case as well. What are the resources? What's the physical topology, etc. There's been a lot of discussion and we have to realize that every line between each of these elements requires some config and provisioning as well as analytics coming out of it. But the goal of ONAP and the goal of OPNFV and the goal of all the work we've done in networking inside the Linux Foundation is to remove the complexity below that red line. What I'm trying to say is that the notion that's been discussed in the industry of the whole stack developer is in fact a fallacy. The goal of what we're trying to do in all this infrastructure is in fact a no stack developer in which everything below the red line becomes intent driven networking with the rules passed from the application on top. And we have quite a ways to go but the goal is to really remove the complexity of this part of the network and this part of the IT stack from an application developer and from an operator. So to show the difference between this you can see the classic VMware stack or VM stack on the left hand side or the right hand side and you can see the classic container stack on the left hand side here and what's really interesting about this is the separation of life cycle management from policy management on the top. And in the classic VM based stack and looking at OPNFV in this case really it shows that the policy point in the middle is open daylight and on the left hand side what's interesting is that there is no policy point yet available and I show one open source project called Conteev and there's several other open source projects in the space but that policy point becomes the way that compute network storage and security end up getting optimized together and that doesn't exist as a uniform way inside the container stack today and what this enables us to do underneath then is to use projects like FIDO, a forwarding plane running in user space and have that be configured and operated at the pace of the applications that are happening within Kubernetes for example. As this comes together inside the Linux foundation there's a number of different elements that are being worked on towards building out this stack and these are some of those open source projects and this actually has been built together and was shown at the ANGA conference just about a month ago. Building out the networking pieces as if it was a generic application in a container based stack but a number of these pieces had to come together. The policy piece had to be built, a net plug-in on top of FIDO had to be built and these are now all open sourced again in experimentation towards driving and building an active networking stack as part of the container ecosystem to be able to deploy these applications readily. So when we take a look at these different open source solution components we have to realize that looking down from the top now at Cloud Foundry there is no tie in Diego or in Bosch to the networking pieces below and so how can we get a notion of the rules that we want to drive all the way from the PAS layer to be driven through that infrastructure and so Cloud Foundry has picked up a notion of OCI and picked up CNI and a number of other open source projects within its architecture to be able to start to move towards this architecture that I'm describing which is the rules go with the application that get driven into the overall stack and it allows virtualized functions either running on bare metal, hypervisor or containers to be fully orchestrated across compute, networking, storage and security. That's the overall goal for which we have quite a bit of work to do. Nonetheless, a number of these projects are working very closely together and one is ONAP and OPNFV as I mentioned and as was mentioned in the previous talk. The components of ONAP on top which performs management, orchestration and design of a service can be built on top of technically OPNFV which then can config provision and provide analytics for the infrastructure and for the services being deployed and thankfully a number of these projects coming together and in this case what was proposed last week at the OPNFV summit was that there's a cross-community infrastructure and ability to test out this entire piece moving forward and so that was a fantastic outcome last week. As we take a look at how ONAP, Open Networking Automation Project is moving forward, these are all the components of that piece and this is being able to enable companies like China Unicom to be able to build their core architecture over time and continue to add identity, policy, analytics and even billing as a piece of this. But these are all the pieces that need to come together. What's being proposed is evolving ONAP to take on some of these new elements and projects that I haven't read and these are some of the projects that are part of the first releases of that project itself and the good thing that you can see here is that a number of the networking pieces that have been built from SDN control through the protocols through virtual networking, telemetry, analytics are embedded and be able to be integrated as a part of this overall architecture. DCAE for example which is the analytics engine of ONAP, Panda is being built in with that as well as I mentioned as well as if we can bring OPNFV underneath, we then have that stack to orchestrate those services. So where this is heading and the big conversation going on in the networking community of the Linux foundation is really trying to pull these all together underneath an open networking umbrella so that way the architecture can come together and there aren't necessarily a number of competing satellites of technology although we continue to foster and desire new approaches to solve this problem but that there is a stack that actually can be built and operated to have the industry on a common trajectory to use bare metal hypervisors and containers in the same orchestrated workflow all with the same policy including identity associated with it. So the industries come a very long way and the networking industry in particular has come a very long way in the last five to seven years as it's been working not only in standards but now within the Linux foundation. We've built a number, we've built a service life cycle management, OPNFV to be able to orchestrate the hardware, a data platform and what's being added to the mix now is that linkage of identity of things and people to the two compute networking storage and security through a policy engine across bare metal hypervisor and containers. It's been a ton of work, there's a long way to go, the Linux foundation has been paramount in working towards achieving these goals and this is where we're headed as a networking community. So thank you very much.


Your level of integrity is Directly proportional to the level of energy that you'll have The more integrity you have the more energy the less integrity the less energy. Now. Why is that?    You're gonna want to get attention, but let's take the opposite end of the spectrum Let's say that you're not proud of yourself right now. You're not living up to your potential You're not Looking inside and seeing what's important for you And you actually you'd rather take a second hand version of what somebody else tells you that you should do in that case You're gonna have less energy now You're not only going to have less energy also Gonna have less respect for yourself. You're gonna feel as good and instead of seeking attention You know getting as much attention as possible and expressing yourself as much as possible You're going to seek to avoid attention, which obviously destroys any chance of creating Influence, which is how you get money women travel anything you want to get in life is about influence Why is that? Well There's this thing that you learn in ethics.  Let's say you are proud of yourself. You do love your life. Well, you always want more Because you like it So again, if you have an energy problem, if you find yourself not not having the energy To do what you need to do not feeling motivated Not feeling proud of yourself not feeling expressive not wanting to get attention. That means you're out of balance Okay, that means that you have a lack of ethics right now. You basically lost it Okay, what you need to do is return to that place of Identity that place where you feel right with what you're doing and for that you need to listen to yourself You need to listen to what your heart is saying because if you don't do that You're just going to remain in low energy and it's going to get worse and worse and worse Okay, so solve that shit. If you need help with that, I'd love to help you And if you have any questions feel free to ask. Thanks for watching You


Arasas, yeah, that's it. Hup. All the guards, come with me. Being a Marine is a state of mind. It is an experience some have likened more to a calling than a profession. Being a Marine is not a job, not a paycheck. It is not an occupational specialty. It is not male or female, majority or minority, nor is it a rank and signal. Stars, bars, chevrons are only indicators of the responsibility or authority we hold at that given time.  It is a searing mark in our innermost being which comes after the rite of passage for the boot camp or officer cannon school, when a young man or woman is allowed the first time to say, I'm a United States Marine. And unlike physical or psychological scars which, over time, tend to heal and fade in intensity, the even-globin anchor only go a more divine, more intense, the longer you are on it. Once a Marine, always a Marine.


Hey guys Shea Bear 1000 here Today, I got some really cool stuff for you that we captured at the cemetery that's playing right there behind us Now that's monkey's video but on my video we recorded she had a ghost box app on her phone and It was recording some stuff Or saying some stuff and I recorded it with my camera Now I'm going to do this one clip and Just this video about this one clip because it's really interesting because it's a it's a response It's a direct response in my book anyway Now this is what I capture guys now remember I'm not you know I mean this is it. This is what I captured. This wasn't an actual investigation. We were just kind of playing around But in the video, I'll show the clip and then I'll I Will let you listen to the audio and then I'll split it for you Like from where I'm talking so it can be just one certain thing then I've also Enhanced the audio so you guys can can hear it better Because it's kind of faint. So I'm going to play that for you right now those clips and Oh, I've got a couple different different clips of it A couple of them's just the audio, but I'll play them for you right now Might have been just a tree limb falling But it made one hell of a crack What'd that say? Might have been just a tree limb falling But it made one hell of a crack What'd that say? What'd that say? So if you ask me that's pretty That sounds like an intelligent answer even even for an app on your phone. I mean, it's a direct response. It sounds intelligent It's kind of creepy But you know what you guys think I I think it's pretty cool Now the second the second one is just the audio, but it came from that clip now In that clip you heard Well right before that I caught an EVP an actual EVP electronic voice phenomenon now That was captured with the camera mic It didn't come from the ghost box app at all and what I believe it to be saying it's thunder now right now So it kind of makes it spooky what I believe it to be saying is Listen, it sounds like a voice is whispering listen So I've got that for you as well on the You know on the audio now you won't really be able to hear it that well in In the video clip, but I'll play the video clip again And then I'll play the audio that I cut out of that clip And then I'll enhance it for you and let you guys hear that so Let's take a listen and see what you think It made one hell of a crack What'd that say? You know, that's that's pretty compelling because you know, she she's asking for responses or anybody here She says speak now and it says I'm here, but right before the I'm here you hear it say listen I'm here So I think that's pretty cool. That's what we think we're hearing So what do you guys think leave in the comments below? I hope you enjoyed watching stay tuned for more of this stuff because I've got a lot more coming for you So she bear the myth man legend gone for now. Thanks for watching guys. Bye. Bye. Take care