Russia will have to punish Armenia for geopolitical treachery. The Armenian leadership's apparent intention to sacrifice its partnership with Russia for Western offers has garnered concern from Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who decries the country's willful pursuit of the collapse of relations with Russia. Lavrov has stated that the Armenian leadership's actions are leading to the slandering of Russian servicemen who serve at the 102nd Military Base, the border guards, and the Collective Security Treaty Organization at large, according to Kaliber Media Outlet. Russian political scientist Andrei Petrov believes that the fate of Armenia will be decided in Brussels on April the 5th. Petrov posits that Ursula von der Leyen and Antony Blinken await Pashinyan in Brussels not to discuss economic security or other matters, but to finalize Armenia's anti-Russian position and document it. In this opinion, the first thing to expect is that Blinken will order Pashinyan to completely withdraw all Russian military structures from Armenia. The first step has already been taken. Russian border guards will be withdrawn from Zvatnots Airport so that any Western politician or military officer can fly to Armenia unhindered. Then it is logical to propose to Russia to remove the border guards from the Iranian and Turkish borders, and then the most important question will be raised, the location of the Russian military base in Gumri Petrov noted. According to him, Armenia is quite ready to surrender to the US in exchange for some bonuses such as EU candidate status and become a kind of prize, a symbolic victory of the EU and the US over Russia. According to the political analyst, if Armenia does not listen and documents the agreements proposed by the West, Moscow may have to take action against Armenia for betraying its geopolitical interests. The following statement from a political analyst suggests that Russia may take tough actions against Armenia using economic levers. Mass events are held in Israel. The multi-thousand event will begin on Sunday, March 31. This was reported by the Times of Israel. The participants of the action demand the resignation of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the holding of early elections. One of the main demands of the protesters is to reach an agreement on the release of 130 hostages held in the Gaza Strip. They accused the government of blocking negotiations on the release of the hostages. It is reported that the actions will last for four days according to the Israeli press, this protest is the largest since the attack of Hamas on Israel on October 7, 2023. According to preliminary information, more than 100,000 people are participating in the action demonstrators on Sunday evening blocked a main city highway after earlier rallying in front of the Israeli parliament, lighting fires and waving the national flag. Police used water cannon against the crowd and jostled and pushed protesters back as they shouted that Netanyahu must go, pressure has been growing on the prime minister as opponents of his right-wing government have found common cause with the families of the hundred or more captives still held by the Palestinian group Hamas in Gaza. The families have pledged to take to the streets every night this week as they call for the government to bring them home, many protesters carried placards of Netanyahu's face covered in blood, accusing him of failing to protect the country from Hamas. Even before Israel's war on Gaza, Netanyahu had faced months of street protests over controversial judicial reforms. US President Joe Biden has invited the former US president and his election opponent Donald Trump to play golf dot on his Twitter page. The current US president posted a video excerpt from a fundraising event held on March 28, where the host jokingly said that Biden had not won any of the golf championships organized by Trump. Biden responded to the joke by saying that he had offered to play golf with Trump back in 2016. Donald, my offer to play golf still stands. I'll let you take three strokes off your game if you carry your own bag, Biden wrote under the video on Twitter, the US presidential election is scheduled for November 5, 2024. According to forecasts, the main Democratic candidate will be the current American leader Joe Biden, while Trump will run for the Republicans die in March, for the first time since August of last year. Biden was ahead of his rival in the rankings. And later it became known that Biden is ahead of Trump in six of the seven key swing states. In two of them, by a significant margin, the shift occurred after five months of Trump's mainly leading position and followed the president's state of the nation address, which rallied Democrats and seemingly East concerns about Biden's age. Bloomberg notes that it is still too early to say whether Biden's ratings improvement is a one-time increase or the beginning of long-term changes in the election race. Biden continues to lag behind Trump and four of the most crucial states. Biden's more optimistic figures come at a pivotal moment in the election campaign. Trump is currently experiencing a lack of funds for his campaign and is holding fewer rallies and events. Raleigh, Saginaw, Milwaukee, Phoenix, Vegas, Hot Lanna, the Philly suburbs, Manchester, Dallas and Houston. Donald Trump, as far as we can tell, has just been trying to win a third championship at his own golf course. My question to you, sir, can voters trust a presidential candidate who has not won a single Trump International Golf Club trophy at long last, sir, have you no chip shot? Well, look, I'd be happy to play. I told them this before, when he came into the oval, when he was being before you got sworn in. I said, I'll give you three strokes if you carry your own bag.


sometimes you're just unlucky. So I read this article a couple days ago about a concealed carry holder in Colorado who basically stopped a mass shooting for for all intensive purposes and then was tragically mistaken as the gunman by responding police officers and then they shot him. So Jonathan Hurley, I believe is how you pronounce that, I'll post the article here below but this bad guy rolled up, pulled out of shotgun out of his car, shot a police officer just kind of not point blank but pretty close for no reason as far as we could tell, concealed carry holder rolls up, shoots the bad guy, deals with the problem and then is recovering the bad guy's weapon which was an AR at that point. The bad guy had gone back to his car, got his, dropped a shotgun, got his AR and then responding officers showed up, mistook him for their gunman and then shot him and he didn't make it. It's a sad story, right?  Like don't pick up and hold the bad guy's gun. I don't know how long he had it, I don't know what he was doing with it, right? I don't know any of that so maybe there's some small like tactical thing you could learn here but by and large this is just a case of bad luck. This is just a case of one guy, the Jonathan Hurley guy, doing his job and I don't mean like his profession, I mean like here's a guy who stood in the gap, right? Here's a guy who's a hero who said there's a bad guy just shooting random people and I'm gonna go do something about that. He didn't just duck his head and go home. He didn't just ignore the problem. He went and dealt with the problem and it cost him his life and in that regard we want to honor those people, right? Like that guy did the right thing. He was mistaken for the bad guy and was tragically shot and I'm sure the police officer who shot him feels horrible.  It's just an incident of bad luck and sometimes when you decide to lay it on the line to help other people you get bad luck and it just happens. It's part of the risk you're assuming. It's part of the game you're gonna play and you could say listen Dylan, I'm not gonna play that game. This is exactly why I'd never get involved in a third-party incident and I just turn and go home and I would say listen more people are alive today because Mr. Jonathan Hurley decided to sacrifice his life and decided to take that risk and lay it on the line then if he would have just turned and went home. More people are alive because this guy took it on himself to stand in the gap, see a problem and solve the problem and we need more men like that. We need more men like that in this country. We don't need people who are just gonna duck out of it and try to avoid the problem, right? There's this whole thing and kind of the conceal carry instructor world which I consider myself a part of because I teach permit to carry. There's this whole thing where you know we're just going to avoid problems and we only carry our guns to just defend us and we're gonna look the other way and not do anything about problems and I don't I understand what it's coming from from like a legal risk evaluation perspective and whatever.  If you're just going to turn tail and run or you're just going to go home or you're just going to ignore the problem because you don't want to get involved what are you carrying a gun for? You could say, oh Dylan, I'm just protecting, carrying it to protect me and myself and whatever and I'm like listen I just I don't like that just feels selfish to me. We all deride the police officer who stood outside of the Parkland School shooting in Florida for not going into the building and doing something. We all rightly call him a coward for not doing something about that and I would level the same charge against you if you're just going to say listen Dylan I'm just I'm just going to keep to myself and I'm going to ignore the problem. Get in there, be the hero, do something about it. I don't really have any mental space in my brain anymore for people who want to just ignore it and they're just going to turn the other way and go because they don't want to get involved. So thank you to Jonathan Hurley and anybody that's involved with him. We appreciate you and we're sorry you're no longer with us. The world is a lesser place without men like that. Do brave deeds and endure.


Hi, this is George Kow and I have a question for you today. How often is too often to post on social media? So you may be watching this on Facebook. How many posts is too many posts on Facebook per week or per day? If you're watching this on YouTube or LinkedIn or wherever you're watching this, let me know, comment on this particular platform you're on. How often is too often for this platform? I am interested in your personal opinion, not in the internet, what the internet says is the optimal amount of post on social media because I think that most of the advice out there is really, in my opinion, very self-serving, understandably. It's all about optimizing the amount of attention we get as people, as personal brands, as business owners, however we pose, or just as individuals. I think that in this age of social media, the new currency is attention. Just like in terms of money and dollars, we can accumulate a lot to the detriment of someone else. For example, somebody who already has a lot of business can be greedy and want even more business when other peers of theirs are struggling to have enough clients or have enough business. I'm always conscious of that. I'm always seeing if I can refer people to others if I have enough business. Same thing with social media is if we have enough attention, we can share the stage with others who also wish for some attention on their message. I have aired on the side of posting less often because I believe I just personally really value sharing the stage and fairness. The other idea that makes me air on the side of sharing less is the danger of connecting our self-worth to how much attention we are getting. I think all of us need to be aware of this. Some people share on social media and they check back, and I do this sometimes as well, they check back, oh, how many likes did I get? And subconsciously they're really seeing am I liked by others, is my self-worth okay? I think that's dangerous because when we use social media or any kind of marketing with that kind of connecting to self-worth, we tend to enlarge our ego more and more. Our ego becomes fearful and insecure and attached to how much, how much, how popular we are. And so we tend to then do things that are popular and eventually there's a danger of losing our soul, losing our authenticity, right? And saying what we really believe needs to be said. Now this brings me to the intention that we have of posting on social media. When I post, I tend to post things that I genuinely believe are helpful for my audience. Some kind of tips, some kind of advice, some articles, some link, some video that's inspiring them to live a better life or inspiring the world to be a better place. And so I'm actually considering posting more often on social media because I believe the things that I post are genuinely of service. But even so, there can be posting too much, right? And therefore taking the stage away from others and clogging up your news feed whereas others who also want to share a message with you would be bumped out because of how often I post, for example. And so the question comes back to you. I would genuinely love to know how often is too often to post on social media, whatever platform you're watching this on. If you're watching this on Facebook, how many postings is too many postings per day on Facebook or per week, or whatever platform you're watching this on right now? And the second question is, should I post more often on social media? Or do you think I'm already posting enough or posting too much? If you can comment below and let me know, that'd be great. If you want to privately message me and let me know, that would be wonderful as well because I'm genuinely thinking about maybe posting more often on social media because I do find things that I believe are helpful for others that I want to share but I don't want to share too much. So let me know what you think. Thanks so much.