Except the language, everything that the British left in the education has to go. The very education in our country was crafted for that. To produce clerks, sport, art, music, theater, every dimension of life is a wealth for this nation. It is not just clerks, managers, teachers and scientists who make the nation. The most significant thing about the generation that is next is the teachers. It's not a business transaction that you're planting seeds which will blossom well after your time. But that is the greatest thing about being a teacher. Namaskaram. Good morning to everyone. Well, I wouldn't dare lecture to the principals of schools. But we're at a time that when it comes to education, we're in a cusp where our fundamental thinking about what is education needs to go through not a change, but a complete transformation. A time is coming where acquiring knowledge will be of no value. A time is coming where scholarship will be laughed at. But a time is coming where projecting data accumulation as intelligence is going to be a thing of the past. Projecting good memory as intelligence is going to go away, which is the very foundations of the education systems of the day. Whoever has good memory is rated as the most intelligent person. Well, today you know your cell phone has better memory than you. That's why we call the phone smart phone.  Hello?  Because our idea of being smart is about how much GB do you carry. Some of our phones are 600 GB. Believe me, you don't have that kind of memory. This whole process of accumulating information, assimilating it, processing it and throwing out bits and pieces out as knowledge, whether it is scientific knowledge or religious stuff, that by reading a book, projecting yourself as intelligent is going to go away. Because machines will do it far better than you and me. Machine learning or artificial intelligence as it is being built today is essentially about how much data can you gather, process and express. Yes. Unfortunately, for last few centuries, I would say for nearly 250 years across the world, education meant just this, accumulating data, vomiting it somewhere, usually in the examination paper, I mean. And you're rated as brilliant. I must tell you, well he was telling you that I was also in a regional school demonstration, multiple purpose school. When I was 13 years of age, for the first time I saw a calculator, a flatbed calculator. It's not like today, a two-year-old is handling a smartphone or iPad or something. I saw a calculator for the first time when I was 13 years of age. It was a flatbed calculator. Those days there were only two companies making this, Panasonic and Sony. Sony was very expensive, 125 rupees. Panasonic, you could go to one of those Burma bazaars or Hong Kong market or whatever you called it.  So everybody bought Panasonic, a 90 rupee flatbed calculator. Somebody brought this to school and it was a miracle, took, took, took, took, took, into, took, took, took, took, took. I looked at this, immediately my first thought was, if this is this simple, why are they torturing me in the mathematics classes? Why are they trying to teach me this into that, that into this, a cost? It could even do all the sign and cost and all that stuff. I said, everything is here, why are they torturing me? I sat there and imagined a day when these kind of machines will come, which will know all the chemistry formulas, all the physics staff and mathematics and everything, so that I don't have to come to school. Well, I rarely went but even that little bit force that I had to be there. This dream of mine, 50 years ago, is slowly coming through now in the next 10 years, it's going to be real that everything that you can learn from a book and remember, a machine can do it better than you and me. These are great times for human beings. Lot of people, you know, it's crazy they're inviting me to artificial intelligence conferences in various places. I was in St. Petersburg and I was supposed to speak on artificial intelligence. I said, why of all the people you chose me, I'm not artificial intelligence, I thought I was a little natural. They said, no, no, the problem is we will all lose our jobs, what are we supposed to do? I said, you've always been cursing Monday morning when you have to go to work. If you lose your job, isn't it fantastic you're on a vacation? If machines do all the work, isn't it really fantastic? See, this is like the cooling the port at one time. In probably sixties and seventies, he complained heavily because the cranes and gantries came and they started lifting the load off the ship and putting it effortlessly. These guys, there was a time I'm telling you, in Mumbai dock, in the Mazagon dock, if a ship came, those vessels were not of the size that they are today. Usually they were hundred, 150,000 ton vessels. If they came, they would unload it for over three to four months. Today, a quarter million ton vessel comes in the major ports, within 24 hours it is unloaded. Of course, all the labor who had built their muscle just to carry sacks, they all complained, if these machines come, they will destroy our life. Did they or not? All the trade unions complained or not at that time? Hello? So similarly, teachers should not complain and make the same mistake that the coolies did at that time. So what will we do if all machine learning comes? It'll be great time because how much memory you carry on your head will not be of value. What kind of a human being you are will be the highest value. Isn't it fantastic time for human beings?   It's just ramping up information into a child's head in many ways, killing the fundamental genius that every human being carries within themselves. I see if machine learning comes very quickly, in our generation we can see children blossoming into highest levels of intelligence, unfolding of genius will happen because right now this heap that you have to carry on your head, try to remember all those things cos theta, sine theta is driving you crazy when a simple machine can do it. Human intelligence is of a different nature. We should never misunderstand memory as intelligence. Memory makes a few things simple, but it doesn't find excess. Memory is always of the past, isn't it? Hello? Can memory unfold the future? If you invest in memory you will only repeat the past, a modified past as future. This is what is happening to human societies. If past should not be repeated, if we have to live a fresh life in the next moment in tomorrow, if our tomorrow has to be different from yesterday, it is very important that human beings learn not to invest in memory. We use memory, if the machine carries it we can use it and leave it. What we want we can take it, what we don't want we can leave it. But carrying it with you all the time, people are becoming recycling of the past all the time because once you have invested in memory everything that you have is just recycling of the data that you have already gathered. This is in many ways really stifling the human genius. Every human being has a certain element of genius in them. It is only a question of will we be able to provide the right kind of ambience for that particular genius to unfold? This is a challenge. This should be the challenge of the teachers of tomorrow. How do we provide that atmosphere to each unique human being so that they can unfold? That should be the only challenge we must be handling as teachers and people who are in charge of schools. But right now our ninety percent of the focus is how to ram memory into their heads. This is a time that all of you as educationists, you are at a point where the sooner we transform our education system, the better edge our children will have for the future in the world. How quickly we shift to machine learning will determine where India will be in another thirty to forty years time. So you have a tremendous responsibility, but as already introduced you're supposed to grill me. I'll leave it to you. Please if you have questions whatever kind, please. Hello. Yes, sir, please. So you must understand this, though India is one nation, there are at least four to five nations within India. Not everybody is in the same level of needs. There is the most affluent class in the country. There is a segment which is upper middle class whose aspirations are very different. There is middle class where it's always about how will our children get jobs and stuff and there is rural and other dimensions which you're referring to where it's only about somehow getting out of that social and economic pit in which they are. We cannot address all these categories as one. It is wrong to do that. In the name of uniform education, we are trying to do this. I understand the thought behind it, but it's not practical. It's because of this. Over twenty-four billion dollars worth of education in India is going out to outside universities because those who can afford, they don't want their children to study here because it is common class education. It's very important that we're able to provide for every segment of society, this is not to discriminate, this is not to segregate, but anywhere in the world it's like that. According to one's economic capabilities, different levels, whether you go to a restaurant or you take a bus or you take a train, there is first class, second class, third class, isn't it? Well, third class people won't be taken only halfway journey. They also travel full journey. Yes or no? Just because somebody gets into a third class compartment, it's only a question of comfort and ambiance and stuff. But the distance and the destination is same for first class and third class, isn't it? If you say we will make everything third class, a whole segment of people will not travel by train anymore, that's for sure. So similarly in education, this is not about classes I would not like to use the word class when it comes to education, but the needs are different. If we do not provide this, we will not create variety of human beings that we need for this nation's well-being. We need leaders, we need scientists, we need teachers, we need engineers, we need farmers, we need craftsmen, we need variety of people to make a nation happen. Right now our entire education is actually oriented towards elite. Everybody is supposed to go to the university, that's how our education is constructed. Everybody need not go to the university. University is not a place to live. Like some people in Delhi, I hear till they are forty they're living in the university. You must live in this universe, not in the university. So the whole population aiming towards the university is not the right kind of education. This is… this is the education designed by Her Majesty's service. We have made some changes, but we need more drastic changes. I am saying, this may sound extreme to you, but what I am saying is, except the language, everything that the British left in the education has to go. Language is a passport to the world, we must keep the language. Everything else need to go because that was designed for a specific purpose. Where obedience is higher than intelligence, that's not the way to bring up our children. That is the way to bring up occupied population. When we occupy a nation, we want obedience. When we are raising our children, obedience is not what we want, we want them to flourish.  Our children must be two steps ahead of us, isn't it? So if that has to happen, we have to craft this just to give you some sense of this. We're running three different types of schools, more as model schools so that these systems can be incorporated by everybody. We have one level of schools in rural India, in remote places where there is usually no proper education facility. These are called Isha Vidya schools. Here the focus is mainly to get them out of their economic and social conditions. They will never get out of those social conditions in which they are, unless you move them away in some way. They must have a passport to go anywhere they want, not stuck in the same place. Almost forty-six to forty-seven percent of the children who are in our schools are first generation going to school, their parents have never been to school. This education, at the age of six, we start English language and computer usage because these two are passports for them to step out. We have another school called Isha Home School, this is for the affluent where it is run this way, twenty children will stay in a large household with two committed parents and all education happens within the house except for libraries, laboratories and playgrounds. Everything else is largely within the home kind of atmosphere. In a very caring, committed way this process happens. The education is in a thematic way, in the sense we always start the school when the monsoons are pouring. So, the first, second, third standard always starts off with monsoon. We get them soaked in the rain, which parents never allow them to do. They really get through and through, soaked to the bone. And then we talk about the chemistry of monsoon, the… you know, the other meteorological aspects of the monsoon, the economy of the monsoon, the psychological impact of the monsoon, everything is from the monsoon because you cannot ignore monsoon in southern India next to the western gods. And when monsoon is happening, you're telling them E is equal to MC squared, it's not going to work. The children are interested in the rain, they think the sky is falling apart. This is the time to get them engaged in that. So, this school is run in a certain way, this costs money. This kind of arrangement costs money because for every four-and-a-half children, we have one adult taking care of them. So, on an average, I'm saying, this takes a very intense approach. And our maximum limit is only three-hundred-and-forty children. Obviously, we cannot educate the whole country like this. It's just more like a model as to how it works. And it works in a brilliant way. You must come and see the children how they shape up in these twelve years. Actually, I made twelve-year education into thirteen years. Because we have invested so much in art, music, theater, sport, leadership, that when the children come to eleven standard, parents go, mocks mad. What about my child? Where will he go? Where will he go? So, we said, I said, one year extra. So, people told me, Sadguru, who will leave their children for one year extra? They're eager, their children go to IIT, medical college, this one, that one. I said, this is the way it is. Those who want to withdraw, their children can withdraw. This happened three years ago. Not a single child was withdrawn. All the parents wanted their children to go through this. Because most of these children are think… Most of these parents are thinking of sending their children to, you know, foreign universities, outside, overseas universities and things like this. One more year they settle, they have a huge exposure to leadership qualities and variety of other things. In this school, we are beginning to do this. We wanted to start separate schools for this, but because we didn't have the economic strength to do it, within the school we are doing it, we identify about twelve children. A group of twelve children, when they are in their seventh standard and we establish a mentor. Like let's say mathematics, we have a very high quality mathematics mentor. He takes these twelve children from the age of ten-eleven to seventeen. Eighty percent of the education is only mathematics. Only twenty percent in the other curriculum they play around a bit. But these are only focused on mathematics. If we don't do this now, that our focus is not specialized, we are only thinking of… See there was a time in sixties and seventies, we were thinking of literacy in this country. Because when the British left, our literacy was somewhere around seven percent of the population, rest were illiterate. So our whole focus was how somebody can put his name on the paper. This was our focus. So mass to educate millions of people to one level is different. To come out with specialized focus towards children who are capable of that is different. If we don't do that, we will not have great scientists, we will not have great mathematicians, we will not have anything significant in the country. We'll have just a mass of people with the attitude of being educated without much education in them. So this is one dimension of education. We have another education system called Isha Samskriti, where the only six subjects they study are yoga, khaleri paitu, you've heard of khaleri paitu. It's a mother of all martial arts, classical dance, classical music, Sanskrit language and English language. These are only six things they study, no academics. If you want to see really truly fantastic children anywhere, you must come and see these children. Because the focus is just on growing human body and human brain to its full potential without any intention. What will you become? We never ask them. Will you become a doctor? Will you become an engineer? See, these are all social things. These are not real things. From my own experience, like he was saying that my vision is because my father is an ophthalmologist. Well, he only examined the two eyes. He had no instruments to examine the third one. So this education is focused towards education without intent. Developing human brain and body to the highest possible level without fixing what you should do. Because what should a human being do, what is most needed in the world, that's what he should do. It is not for me or you to do something fanciful that I desire. What is it that is most needed right now? That's what human intelligence should do, isn't it? If one is…  If you're intelligent, you will do what you love to do. But really if your genius is flowered, you will do what is most needed right now, joyfully. That's what needs to happen. Namaskaram, Sadhguru. Our education system is not helping to handle our intelligence and most intelligence are suffering. If you don't know how to handle your own intelligence, you suffer a lot. And how to prevent our own intelligence from turning enemy. Thank you. Isn't that the only problem that human beings have? They call it by many names. People say, use many words, stress, anxiety, depression, madness, misery. These are all different names.  See, if you are with me and you're miserable, you can say, I'm miserable because of you, maybe. But you must try this. You sit alone for three days without any contact. I mean even the phone, without the phone. No television, no phone, no book. Simply sit by yourself, alert, not sleeping. If you're miserable by yourself, you're obviously in bad company, isn't it? Hello? Because your own intelligence is turning against you. Once your intelligence turns against you. Ah, no power in the universe can save you. There's no way out of it. It's very important. This body, this mind, these emotions, these energies work for you, isn't it? Even if the whole world turns against you, this one must always work for you.   Because right from early childhood, you've been thought about everything in the universe. Things that you've not seen. Everybody is talking about an atom. Nobody has seen one. I'm not saying it doesn't exist. What I'm saying is, if you do not even understand the one that you live in, how is it that you understand all these fantastic things? Things that you've not seen. So, unfortunately at the school level, I would say further even at college and PhD level, science is running like religion. What is written in the book is ultimate. This is the way of the religion. This is not the way of science, isn't it so? Hello? Science should be exploration. Whatever is written in the textbook is true. He's a religious affair. Whatever is written in my book is hundred percent truth and nothing else but that. This rubbish we have stra... suffered for a long time. We don't have to take that into our future. What is written in the book is fine, somebody's knowledge. But the essence of this culture has always been to question everything. Even... you must understand this, this is a nation where nobody could give us a commandment. Even when the so-called divine entities came, they could not give us a commandment. We only asked them questions. Shiva came. Adiyogi came. He opened his mouth to speak to his beloved wife. She freaks him with a million questions. Krishna tries to speak to his closest friend Arjuna. That too at the edge of the battlefield. That guy asks hundreds of questions. He can't set up and listen because that's not Indian. Anywhere else, if anybody who claimed to be god or god's agent or god's son or whatever, they would say, this is god's will, shut up and listen and everybody listen. Not in this country because we have a very ingrained scientific temperament in us, not the kind of scientific temperament of disregarding everything as it's become today. We have a different kind of scientific temperament. We question everything but with reverence. We bow down to him and say you are my god but we have question. Hello? Hasn't this been our way? This is scientific temperament.  This is not science.  So we are not religious people. We have a very scientific temperament always asking questions and questions and questions. You should not kill that in the schools. They must ask questions. What is written in the textbook is not absolute. Hello? This happened. Rao Garu, can I tell a joke? Is it okay? Okay. Because usually principles are considered very serious. At least children things saw. This was in London. This was one of those social night dinners where all kinds of people were there. A very profound scientist. Also was invited. He was a quiet man sitting there. Nobody noticed him because he's not dressed like that, he's not acting like this, nor is he drunk, nor anything to be noticed in a party. You must be either dressed in a bizarre way or you must be talking in a bizarre way or you must be at least drunk. He was not any of those things. So nobody noticed him, he just sat. And a very high society lady came and settled down next to him. She ignored him and she was busy. Then just out of simple courtesy she looked at him and asked her, what do you do? The scientist said, he said, I'm studying science. Oh, she said, oh, you're studying science. I was done with it in my high school. What to do? We think we can be done with science. There's no such thing. It is not done with a textbook, it's not done with a PhD, it's not done with anything, it's a constant inquiry. This sense of inquiry is deeply, deeply ingrained within this culture because we've always been a land of seekers. We sought maybe inner nature, but we have the temperament to seek. We are not a land of believers. You can't make us believe what's written in the textbook. We will question. This is the nature of who we are because we've always been a land of seekers. We have never been a land of believers. This must continue in a more aggressive way. People are trying to subdue this. No, more questioning should happen than ever before because if you don't raise questions, then human intelligence will slowly sleep. Maybe putting it to sleep is better than turning it against yourself. That may be the logic. As you have heard, this word is being used everywhere. Suppose somebody is doing yoga, we say he is doing sadhana. The word sadhana has been misunderstood as practice. Sadhana means a tool. That means we are turning this body, this mind, this intelligence, this memory, this emotion, this energy into a tool. These are my tools. To live this life, these are my tools, isn't it? What are the... What else do you have? This is all you got. If the tools that you have don't work for you, they will become a new sense. And tools are of immense value. Human beings, we as human beings, we are who we are on this planet, compared to other creatures, only because of our ability to use tools. Is that so? I'm seeking a higher opinion. Those... those up there, hello? Is that so? We are who we are, only because of our ability to use tools, isn't it? So for example, they were showing the image of Dhyanalinga on the video. People come and when I'm speaking, if I say... If I refer to Dhyanalinga as a tool, some people get offended. Sadhguru, how can you call Dhyanalinga a tool? It's more than our life. I said, then you do one thing, you come to the yoga center, I'll give you some work, maybe plumbing maintenance work. No tools. You can do it with your hands, use your nails, use your teeth if you wish. At the end of three days, most of your nails will be gone, some teeth will be gone. After three days, I will give you just one spanner. Will you worship the spanner or no? Hello? Yes? So you don't understand the power of a tool. So if this body, this intelligence, this bank of memory that I have, these emotions and these energies don't become effective tools in my life, I am a disaster. Doesn't need any outside help. Why most people get married is because they at least want to see I'm miserable because of somebody else. They don't want to see they're miserable by themselves because if you see them and they're not married, they were anyway miserable. When they get married, they have a good excuse. It's because there is a way to turn this into our tools. These are our tools to be used for our well-being. And if when we are well, tell me when you are feeling really wonderful within yourself. Let's say, you feeling blissed out right now, are you not wonderful to everything and everybody around you? Hello? If you're feeling absolutely blissed out, I'm sure if I come and meet you, you're an absolutely wonderful human being. But if I meet you when you're angry, frustrated, miserable, you could be nasty, isn't it? Hello? This is true with every human being. So the fundamental insurance on this planet to create a wonderful humanity is, first and foremost thing is, you must be loyal to your wonderfulness. Everybody is wonderful here and there. But is it not important every moment of your life, you're loyal to your wonderfulness? If you're not loyal to anything else, it doesn't matter. You're loyal to your wonderfulness, you're always feeling wonderful within you. Now we can trust you that you are going to be wonderful to everybody. When you are feeling nasty, how to expect you to be wonderful to everybody else? Myself, Seema Srivastava, Guru Ram Rijan, Kindri Vidyalay Sangatan. Sir, being the school leaders, we are often confronted with the dilemma of being effective or popular. Satguruji, how do you manage both and unconventional yet popular? Thank you, sir. If you're not popular, you will not be effective. You may think you are effective, but please know this, if you're not popular, when everybody works against you, you're not going to be effective. You're not a one-man army in a school, all right? Everybody has to cooperate willingly, not forcefully. Only when everybody cooperates willingly, then you're very effective. You can take it where you want, isn't it? Nobody wants to cooperate with you. No way you're going to be effective. So popularity is important. If you're understanding popularity as compromise, now I'm not talking about populism, but popularity is important. How will you become popular? Just yesterday somebody was asking me in some meeting that I was in. Satguru, I have a fourteen-year-old boy. Fourteen-year-old boy is trouble, I know. Because I was a fourteen-year-old boy at one time. I was. I know he's trouble. The lady was in tears. I have a fourteen-year-old boy. I understand. So don't say anything more, I understand. Fourteen-year-old boy. So the thing is, when you had a child, when it was… when the… it was a little infant, you loved it because you could twist it and turn it and play with it, whichever way you want, yes? Then it became three-year-old. It was crawling all over the place. You also crawled with the baby. You played with the baby. You tried to speak like them, kuku, kupa, peekipu, all that. Everything was nice. Then he stood up. Now he's become a fourteen-year-old boy. What that means is, he's trying to be his own. He wants to be a man. He's a hurry. But you still want to do mu mu mu to him. When you… When you crawled with him When he was two, three years old, he also enjoyed it. But now he wants to swing. You should also swing with him. But you still want to crawl. You still want to do moo-moo-moo, doesn't work.  Yes? The other principle, use the word others. Well, how do you translate others into English? Ideal is it? Oh, okay, let's use that. Ideal does not mean perfect. Ideal means something that everybody aspires to be. I'm sorry? No, no, no, don't roll with the models, that's not good. Roll model is a very western thing. Ideal means something that everybody aspires to be one way or the other. So instead of being popular, you must become that kind of a person. You don't have to say a thing.  Do you know how easy to run a school then? Hello? All the kids want to be like you. So that's a lot of exercise for you. You must learn to dance like them. You must like to sing like them. You learn to speak like them. Then they say, wow, this is how I want to be. Once they want to be like you, there is no issue making it happen. Yes? Very simple. I was doing a program for one of the top aware, you know, really one of the largest multinational company in the world, top twenty-five executives, it's a two-day event. I had nine volunteers with me. Issa Foundation is a completely volunteer-run organization. And these nine volunteers were managing everything for the program. And on the second day, one of these executives asked me, Sadhguru, where do you get such people? Because they are always looking for attrition, you know. Where do you get such people? I said, you don't get them, you got to make them. How do you make them? I said, you have to make them fall in love with you. So you must make them fall in love with you, not demand something. You must make them fall in love with you.  Rest of the nine fingers can do something else, because they're all in love with you. This is what you need to do. If somebody has to fall in love with you, what you… what you should do, tch, you may shine a bit. Hello? Yes or no? You may shine a little bit. How to shine? I won't tell you, because in different atmosphere you have to shine differently. If you shine the same way everywhere, it'll become ridiculous. In different places with different people, you have to shine differently. That means you must be absolutely flexible, right now principle means… I'm not saying all of you are like that, that's the kind I saw. So that's why I rarely went to the school, unless it was a must. I never went there. What is that? I don't want to be near that kind of person. So I didn't go there. So, not all children may be as enterprising as me, who found various ways not to go there. Poor children they end up there and they're constantly with somebody that they don't like to be with. No wonder they'll create trouble. Hello? They're always looking how to put the teacher into trouble. I'll tell you this, you must come and see, because you're educators, when it's possible for you, please come and see this. Don't go by my word. When we were creating the Isha Home School, first day I called a group of people, none of them are teachers, even now almost ninety percent of them are not trained teachers. They're just doctors, engineers, accountants, well-educated, intelligent people, but not trained to be teachers, because I don't want them to come with the baggage of how to teach.  And they've become fantastic teachers now, by themselves because it's the students who take it up. So they asked me, Sadhguru, after I spoke for about six hours, they said, how do we know that we are fulfilling your vision? I said, this is all, it's a residential school. So I said, see at the end of the term, if children are in tears to go back home, that means you're doing well. But if children are in tears when they come to school, that means you're not fulfilling my vision. Today you must come and see, at least thirty to forty percent of the children, when they're going for vacation, they're all in tears. At least fifteen percent of the children come ten to fifteen days early to the school because they want to be part of setting up the school, along with the teachers. That's wonderful. They want to be there. When I said one year extra, all children celebrated, wow, one more year we're going to be in school. When I was in school, if they had told me, one more year, I said, I quit. So, we must create a space where they want to be there. Well, we are running government-run schools, not everything is in your hands, but you're persona and how you do things is in your hands. You may not be able to change the whole school. We have made the school almost like an art museum. I decided if we ever create an educational institution, first of all children should learn to walk and move gently. So, we created a very delicate art in the school. Believe me, in the last thirteen years time, not one thing is broken. Children maintain everything. We let them run the school sometimes. The finance of the school, the cooking, the works that happens one week in a year, they run the school completely. So, they know this is important. They are not just there as recipients of something. They are part of making the school. And the school anthem says this, I am the school. I am not in the school, I am the school. Because without the children, where is the school? It's a children or the school, isn't it? We must bring this in their emotion and thought that you are the school, not me. I am a principal, but I am not the school. You are the school, isn't it? I am only facilitating, but you are the real school, without you, where is the school? If this comes into them, I am sure you can create to whatever extent possible, the ideal may not happen, but we can aspire towards it. Hello? Yes, sir. One question from this side. Where I go? Wow. Yes. Upper regions. Sir, I am Mrs. Jyoti from Bhopal. I have a question. Rather, I need your guidance. With the influence of the modern culture, there is a tremendous amount of change in the society where the media is playing a very big role and that we find a change in the values system in our new generation. Please guide us. How do we cope up with this change in the values among our children? Thank you. See, this is not a new problem. This has been an age-old problem. Every generation thinks the next generation is loose. Did you... Did you not face such things with your parents? I am asking. They thought you were not okay. You're thinking the next generation is not okay. We are making the same mistake with every generation. Well, for me personally, I wish it becomes like this for everybody. For me personally, my integrity is not because of my morality. My integrity is because of my humanity. This is the only value we must have, that we are human. Rest of the values are all made up by us, isn't it? Your values may not agree with me. My values may not agree with you, but I don't have any, so you don't have to agree with me. The important thing is, our humanity is not compromised at any time because many, many times our morality, our values, our ethics are against our own humanity. So-called moral people are doing inhuman things to each other, isn't it? Hello? In the name of religion, in the name of morality, in the name of ethics and values, people have done terrible things to each other, isn't it so? So what does humanity mean? See, every other creature on this planet goes by its instinct.  Whether it's a grasshopper or a tiger, both of them have no values or ethics or anything. They go by their instincts. They instinctively react to everything. This is why we call tiger a tiger, a grasshopper, a grasshopper, an elephant, an elephant.  This means you are supposed to know how to be. How far away from that are we? If you knew how to be, would you be wonderful or nasty? I'm asking. If you had a choice and you know how to be, would you be wonderful every moment of your life or would you be nasty? Wonderful. If you are wonderful, as we've already gone through this, you would naturally be wonderful to everything else. You don't need values. You don't... See, I always... I wonder, what kind of teaching is this, really? Somebody tried to tell me this when I was in United States and I said, this is not even a teaching for me. Somebody says, thou shall not kill, thou shall not rob your neighbor. It never occurred to me either to rob my neighbor or to kill him. Why are you even telling me such a thing?  It is not even a teaching for me. If your humanity is on, this is not a teaching at all, isn't it? If your humanity is switched off, then maybe you need these things, thou shall not kill, thou shall not rob, thou shall not do this or that. But if your humanity is on, why? So what being human means is, see, you see all the animals, it's happening everywhere, you might not have seen the wild animals doing it, but at least you see the dogs and the street peeing all over the place. You think he has a urinary tract problem? No, he is building a pea kingdom. He's setting his boundaries all the time. So the fundamental thing about being human is we can live here without any sense of boundary within myself. A human being means you are capable of erasing the boundaries, physical boundaries that we naturally have. Beyond that we can operate, beyond that we can reach out, beyond that we can function, beyond that we can think and feel. You can go beyond what is mine and what is not mine. All other creatures go by what is mine and what is not mine. This is my territory, that is your territory. But human being has the capacity to go beyond that.  Human being means you are able to wipe out the boundaries. As you know, in the human brain, there is a reptilian brain about the size of a fist. That part of your brain is always trying to establish boundaries. But the cerebral cortex is always seeing how to expand your boundaries. If you empower that dimension which we call as human being, there is also a human creature within us. We are a product of evolution. So all these animals are still in us. This is why in yoga, all the asanas are named after animals because we are working. How we can transcend this animal nature and we can genuinely become a human being, that means how I am is decided by me, not by any nature, not by any other force other than me. How I am within myself. If this one thing if we do, if this we inculcate in our children, we don't have to worry about their morality as long as they are wonderful human beings, especially if they are not like you. Is it not great? They are not like you. It's very important. Next generation does something that we could not imagine possible, isn't it so? Hello? Should next generation do only what we think is right? No, they must do something that you could not even imagine possible. But if we do not inculcate in them what it means to be human, if we do not stir up their humanity in a big way at an early age, then they will become human animals dangerous. Other animals don't have the needed intelligence so we can easily control them. Human animal is very dangerous. So we should not breed human animals.  Everything else is behind it.   This is what you need to bring in our children. Namaskar, Sadhguruji. To the right you will have to look to the higher opinion balcony. Yes, sir. I am Ajay Panth from Lucknow and my humble salutations to you. My question is, what is your message to those who believe in running down the power of faith, values and the basic ethos of India? I thought I just ran them down myself. Yes. No, there is a basic ethos of faith and value so is it right to run them down? And what do you have to say to such people? And the second question if you choose to answer is, what makes you happy and what makes you sad? Thank you. Let me answer your second question first. I have kept certain privileges to myself. That is being happy, unhappy, being loving or hateful, being this way or that way or what happens within me, whatever. I have not given those privileges to anybody. I kept it to myself. I decide whether I am happy or unhappy. If you decided whether you are happy or unhappy, would you keep yourself happy or unhappy? If you let something or somebody decide, then you being happy is a remote case. So coming to values of faith and... what? Faith and values. I want you to understand, sir, this is not a land of faith. Faith is an imported idea for us. This is a land of seekers. Seeking means you have realized that you do not know. See, suppose you are walking on the street and you do not know which way to go, do you see suddenly you are so humble and nice, sir, which way? You think you know where to go. Yes or no? So you must walk like this, sir, in your school also like you do not know because you actually do not know. Yes or no? What we know of this existence, of this creation, it's just a minuscule, isn't it? Our knowledge about this cosmos is a speck, isn't it so? So if you identify with your knowledge, religious or otherwise, you will become a speck. This is why in the yogic culture, we always identify with our ignorance because our ignorance is boundless. Yes? And if you see to know that I do not know is a wonderful thing because the possibility of knowing arises in your life. Only if you see I do not know, the longing to know, the seeking to know and the possibility of knowing becomes a reality in your life. Everything you do not know, you believe and you call that faith. Whatever I do not know, I just believe. I just believe there is a big man sitting up there, he does everything and that's it. If you don't believe, we'll have you dead. This is faith. This doesn't belong to our country. Here, everybody does the role. The beautiful thing about our nation is we are an eternally confused nation.  In the middle of nowhere, I'm saying this cosmos where it begins, where it ends, nobody knows in the middle of nowhere this tiny circle of fourteen planets spinning around one little star and you and me sitting here and talking like this as if we know everything, is it not fantastic? Hello? Yes or no? We don't know a damn thing and here we are running schools, telling everybody that we know. No, we must tell them we don't know, you don't know. Maybe we can push our knowing one step forward in this generation. It'll be fantastic. One step forward from where we are but faith means you just believe. Everything you do not know, you believe. What belief does to you is, it gives you confidence without clarity, it's a disaster. Confidence without clarity is a disastrous process because if your vision is not clear, at least you must be hesitant, isn't it? You cannot see and you're confident, we know where you're going. Yes or no? You're very serious lot.  Hello? I want to tell a joke sir because children will like it. They were two young boys, they were two young boys, brothers, very energetic. When young boys are very energetic, they are constantly in trouble, you know? These boys are in some kind of trouble all the time. The parents are very embarrassed because the whole neighborhood is discussing their boys.  If you have the necessary love and commitment, you can wait their problems out but you can't really fix it, isn't it so? Hello? With love and commitment if you waited, many problems go away but if you try to fix it, fix it, child will go away. That's all that will happen. So the parents don't know how to fix it so they decided to take these children to their local parish priest because together they're very strong. They decided to take them separately. They took the younger boy first to the priest's office, made him sit there and the parents left. The priest walked in with his long brown color robes. You know these things need a little bit of drama, otherwise they don't work. Faith needs drama always, otherwise it doesn't work. So he walked up and down and up and down with a gray face. The little boy sat there looking at the priest doing the ping-pong act and then the priest is thinking up a strategy. Then he thought, if I remind this little fellow, God is within him. God is within him. All his mischief will go. This is the best thing about life. Those who have never raised children have fantastic ideas.  So mid-stride he stopped and with a booming voice, he said, where is God? The little boy looked bewildered. He looked all over because the God must be somewhere in the priest's office. Then the priest saw he's not getting the point. So he wants to give him a clue. So he leaned on the table, pointing at the little boy's chest. He's indicating God is inside. Where is God? He asked. The boy looked even more bewildered and looked under the table. Then the priest saw he's not getting it. He walked around, came closer, tapping on the little boy's chest. Where is God? It's here, he's indicating. But the boy got up and bolted out of the room, ran to the place where his elder brother was. You know, we are in real trouble. The older boy asked, why, what happened? He said they've lost their God and they think we did it. So, we are always trying to propagate things which doesn't make an iota of sense and we expect the children to listen to that. See, this simple idea that there is a God sitting up there, uparvalam. I'm asking you a simple question because many of you or all of you are teachers, science, geography, everything. You're definitely teaching the children, planet is round. Yes? Hello? Do you believe that also? Hello? You believe that? And it is also spinning. It's a round planet, it's also spinning. If you look up, invariably you're looking up in the wrong direction. Hello? I'm asking, in this cosmos, do you know which side is up, which side is down? Is it somewhere marked, sir? If I missed because I didn't do much schooling, I might have missed it. Is it somewhere marked this side up? Hello? Then how come you don't know which side is up, but you know who is up? How come? How is this? And you expect children to swallow this? These things only worked when the technology was different. When I say technology, see there are two ways to handle a question. If you ask a question, you make an attempt to answer if you know something about it. If you don't know, you say, I don't know. Another way of handling the question is, kill the questioner. This is a very effective way of handling the question. For last couple of thousand years, this is how we have handled it. You ask a question, you're dead. Question is gone. So let's not bring that back again.  But when you ask a question, you must understand the fundamental basis of a question is, I do not know. You've already assumed it does not exist and ask a question. You already assumed that it does exist and ask a question. That's not a question. That is trickery, isn't it? The purpose of a question is to dig deeper. The purpose of a question is not to prove something. Yes or no? You don't ask a question to prove this or that. You ask a question because you genuinely want to know. If you inculcate this in the children, faith will go, but humanity will rise. Questioner asks, Sir, if you set the power of education, then education is for the mind and not for seeking the way of the 90s. How will you teach children to strike a balance? As I said earlier, India is not one nation. There are many layers of India in different levels of comfort, different levels of existence actually. If you ask me, let's say, let's take this as an example. How many or what percentage of people in this country can even sit in a space like this? Not even two percent. Yes or no? This is not some fantastic heavenly place. This is a reasonably comfortable place. But how many people or what percentage of people can even sit in a space like this? It's two percent or less, isn't it so? So when this is the case, we cannot answer this question as one standard. As I said earlier, there are different levels of education which we need to do. Unfortunately, it is so. It is unfortunate that this is the reality, but that is the reality. If we don't work with reality, then that will be even more unfortunate. We have to address different people at different stages. Children who… I'm just… you know, I was at the under-25 conference in Bangalore two days ago. They were asking me, Sadhguru, what is the difference you find between youth of your times? I said, this is also my time. They said, no, no, no, when you were a youth, what… how they were and today how we are, what do you see? I said, see, when we were growing up, our parents, even though they were reasonably well-to-do, largely they were concerned about our livelihood. Always the question is, how will you survive? How will you survive? When I showed no interest in education, I said, I'll do my own thing. They said, how will you survive? That was their only question. Because at that time, if you did not have educational qualification that they desired, you would lose your life, you would be on the street. But today, for a whole lot of people, not for everybody yet, unfortunately, but for a whole lot of parents, at least in urban societies, if a child doesn't get educated, he may at the most lose his lifestyle, but he will not lose his life. That's a big difference. That's a huge difference in the evolution of a nation, isn't it? And when we were growing up, we were always thinking about the nation, we want to cause a revolution, what about the world? Should we cause a global revolution? These kind of thoughts. But today, children are thinking only about their personal aspirations because the larger situation is much better than the way it was when we were growing up. Even though we grew up in reasonably well-to-do families, very well-to-do families, I would say, not maybe rich, but well-to-do, that there is no problem for survival kind of families. But in spite of that, in our parents' minds, the only question is, how will you survive? How will you survive? Today, parents are not thinking like that. Parents are thinking, how will you make it? What creative things can you do? Sport, art, music, everything they are thinking. This is the evolution of a nation. But unfortunately, the evolution of this nation is not symmetrical to all levels of population. So we cannot answer this question as one question. There are many layers and telling a poor family where they are very concerned about the survival of their child, telling them to unleash the genius and do something, something will be cruel upon the parents and the student because the mindset also is like that. So we need to address this more sensitively rather than just one prescription. Please, ma'am. I'm Kashyapi and the question that I would be asking is that I get confronted in a lot of leadership workshops that I conduct with school principals. I am asked that being a school principal in government schools, I am most of the time lowest in the hierarchy of decision makers, yet expected to lead. I am expected to be creative, yet follow all the instructions and the curriculum or things given to me. I am judged for the learning outcomes of the children, yet I'm responsible for the holistic development of the child. And many such dilemma I am told we are caught up in wherein I would choose to do one thing but expect it to do the other. How do I lead? Therefore, not just the self, the school as also the society. What you read out is like the job description. See, most of the things that you said or the challenges that every parent also faces, isn't it so? Yes? Almost every parent, even if they have one or two children, still they go through the same thing. Your problem is a scale. And your problem is they are with you for a limited number of hours and a parent can judge a few things for themselves but you have rules, regulations. Well, as I said earlier, right now we should start relaxing this as we go but till now we have largely been concerned about how to get all children into the education system. Scale has been our only challenge. Quality is not something that we've been able to address seriously. We've addressed to some extent but not in a very big way because scale has been the largest challenge. Nearly, I think, three hundred million children are in school in this country. Three hundred million children in school, I think it's the only nation on the planet which have that many people in school. How to create even a reasonable sense of education for three hundred million children, it's not… it is the population of United States almost. If you take away the Mexicans, that's the population of United States. So with that kind of school population, how to make it artistic, futuristic and this, this, no. It's too difficult. It's… it's too much to expect from the schools. I think with whatever people think is a bit… maybe the rest of the world or affluent countries think we are a little archaic in our school system. But still, when it comes to education, academics, we are at least setting up strong foundations because I see when Indian students go out to the rest of the world, they do absolutely well because they find what is there is so simple and easy compared to what they went through with you. Yes, I've met many Kendriya Vidyalaya students. They go to American universities and they find it's a play because they were tortured sufficiently in 12th standard. Now they go to undergrad and it's nothing. Three years they just play. Really. So at this stage of development for this country, I think that's very needed that we're doing well in the world. Maybe we are not able to focus on really unleashing human genius. See, this is the whole thing. If you look at an Indian student and for example, the most affluent nation is United States, if you take America as a standard, at the age of eighteen, how grounded Indian students are in their subjects and how grounded they are is way apart. We are way better than that. But at the same time, the amount of genius that they unleash, the amount of incredible things that people do by the time they are twenty-four in that country doesn't happen here simply because there is… we are still trying to do mass education with little regimentation because without regimentation you cannot do mass education. So this is a… this is a situation. This is a situational challenge. This is the challenge of the times in which we live for this nation. But we must… as somebody said, the others must be there. What is the ideal? We must be slowly inching towards it. If you try to get there too fast, we will crack up the whole system that we have established. That will be a disaster. We should not destroy the existing system of education. No, it has served its purpose in its own limited way, but it served its purpose. It has taken care of a generation of people. You cannot destroy that. I'm not speaking against it at any point, but we must evolve it slowly, push it, push it, push it. This pushing is not possible for all the three-hundred million children at once. So we must focus on specialized schools. I would like to plead… the minister is not here, he is in the parliament I think today. Otherwise I would like to plead that private schools release them from all curriculum things. I'm… I'm talking like this. Please listen to me carefully, don't misunderstand me. I'm saying, suppose I'm running a school, I will teach rubbish and I will charge enormously. But the parents like it and the children like it, why should the government have any problem? Yes. You think if I'm teaching rubbish, parents and children would come? Hello? But let's say I'm teaching rubbish, but the parents love it and the children love it. Do you believe that any teacher or any government or any ministry is concerned about a child more than their own parents? Hello? No. Parent is the highest concern value in a child's life, isn't it? So if the parents decide this is a good school for my child, why should the government say this is not a good school? It should not enter that space. Either in terms of curriculum or in terms of fee, they should not. Only then we can breed a different level of education because that education cannot be mass education. That will be specialized. It's unfortunate every child will not get it, but if we want to build leaders in every arena of life of science, sport, mathematics and whatever and whatever, including leadership, it's important specialized schools are established, which will cost unfortunately in today's world. And we can always... A private school can always decide they can take a percentage of children who cannot afford it, mainly for their intelligence, but specialized schools are needed if we want to push it ahead. If our intent is we will take all the 300 million children at once at the same level, believe me, we will be at least 50 years behind the rest of the world. There is one way where there is a chance to take out the personal benefits that are within it. There is a cultural benefit within it, but it doesn't get the chance. And we all, the teachers, the new students, the secondary students and our officials, we want our students to be in a very good academy, along with other co-curricular activities, and we want them to develop their children in a very good way, so that we can move forward. Sometimes we have this pressure that we only focus more on the academic side of that child during the exam, and what is relevant within it, is relevant about the game, is relevant about the music, we... that child is more involved in it, his mind is there, his mind is there, and that child is in the academic side, the children are left behind, and then they cannot develop further. Your thoughts on this? I think we've addressed this still now in so many different ways. That's what I'm saying. We need specialized schools for different things.  Unfortunately, a few people have done this in spite of all these restrictions in our country, but it'll never become big like this. So if somebody is, you know, really good at sport, has inclination and passion towards it, he should not be troubled with these things. We have a wrong idea of education. We think only if you get graduation, these degrees and degrees, without any purpose, we think this is education. Now nobody asks, what is Sachin Tendulkar's education? All he did was hit the ball, hit the ball, hit the ball. Now you've made him Bharat Ratna. Isn't it? Don't we need some more Ratnas in the country? For different aspects of life? That is because somebody devoted themselves to just hitting the ball. No chemistry, no mathematics, no nonsense. Yes, because we must understand in the learning capability of a child, one who is good at mathematics may not be good at literature, one who is good at theatre, may not be simply not good at sport, but everybody must go through everything. That is good till they are probably twelve years of age, so that they're exposed to everything. After twelve years of age, every child should start moving towards a specialized segment. Otherwise, you will not produce profound competence. You will produce those kind of people who can be only employed as clerks or something else of that category. They will fit into any office and do simple file-pushing work. We must understand the very education in our country was crafted for that. To produce clerks, they found Indians make very good clerks around the world because they were planning to conquer the whole world. Wherever they went, they found the British people don't make good clerks but Indians make such good clerks because they are naturally... you know, any authority means we bow down. We have touched our parents' feet and grown up. So when somebody elderly or somebody bigger than us speaks, we... like this, they thought this is an ideal condition and they crafted this education. The moment we got our independence, we should have turned the education upside down as it is necessary for independent India, which we have not done. Maybe there were many difficulties. I don't want to do post-mart and make... take a judgment on those people, but now a time has come that we should start turning it around. We can't flip it around tomorrow morning, then it may break. We have to start turning it around, start working towards that others or the ideal condition that we are thinking of, sport, art, music, theater, every dimension of life is a wealth for this nation, isn't it? It's not just... it is not just mathematicians. Mathematicians won't come out of this. It is not just clerks, managers, teachers and scientists who make the nation.  These talents, if we don't nurture at an early age, how will we do it? It's simply, you know, that age is going further and further down. Just a week ago, I was at the Prakash Padukone and Rahul Ravid center of excellence. There, these children... I asked, what age do you start this badminton? Because when Prakash Padukone won his All England championship in 1980, that was the first time a whole lot of Indians heard the word badminton. Most people did not know what is badminton. But today, we have at least half a dozen players who are at the top most international level. This has happened because of that one man's dedication and from him, few people came out and they started academies. These children who are in these academies, they go to school, study the regular stuff and they must get ninety-eight marks. Even if they get ninety-eight out of hundred parents' question, where is the other two percent? But they have to become badminton champions. I said, this is not fair. All the parents are assembled in the thing I said, if you want... if you find the child is physically fit and passionate about the game, willing to dedicate himself because it's hard work. Day in and day out, it's not like going to school. Every day you're up at five o'clock, running in the morning, doing things, endlessly working out.  The kind of education you think sport is an education by itself. Music is an education by itself. This is how this culture has always been nourished. We produce some of the greatest mathematicians, greatest musicians, greatest dancers in this country simply because those who went into those gharanas to learn music did only music and music. Today that's what we brought in our Isha Samskriti. They... the doing music, they do only music. You won't believe today I have at least half a dozen children who grew up with us, who are in the age groups of twenty to twenty-two, eighteen to twenty-two, I would say. If you don't see their faces, if they just sing, if they sing classical music, you bring any expert. Let them just listen to their classical music. They will think they're at least forty-fifty-year-old musicians with twenty-thirty years of experience. That's how they sing. Because from the age of six, they have soaked in music into themselves. We didn't... did not trouble them with geography, history, this, that. Only thing is, we do workshops like Bharath Darshan, they travel around the country to see the country every year and we do some simple workshops for arithmetic and banking and accounting so that they know how to handle their money in future. That's about it. And they know how to speak Sanskrit language they're conversing and they speak English language very well. They can read and write anything that they read they can understand. That's about it. Rest is only music and music and music. If we don't do this, we will not produce any kind of excellence in any field. Everybody will know a bit of everything, but they will not be good at anything. Sir, I want to ask that how education is an art and it is being seen that we are imposing competition in present era on the students, sir. What do you feel about that, sir? Thank you. Well, in 2017, the statistics say over eighteen thousand children that is below eighteen years of age, committed suicide in this country, out of which 7,600 children, but below fifteen years of age, twelve, thirteen, fourteen-year-old children, when there should be a bundle of exuberance and joy at that time of their life, if they are taking their own life, our children, 7,600 children in the age group of twelve to fifteen committed suicide in one year. That means we must understand we are doing something fundamentally wrong, absolutely wrong, there is simply no question about it. This is not a statistic. I am asking, let's ask ourselves, if our children, not as grown-ups, but at the age of twelve or thirteen they committed suicide, would you ever come out of it, I am asking you, because you know you've done something fundamentally wrong, isn't it? Hello? If 7,600 children committed suicide in that age group, we must know we are doing something fundamentally wrong, all of us need to look at it, what can we do so that this doesn't happen, this means as a nation, as a society, we have taken a wrong step when it comes to raising our children. Sir, this person standing up here? No. I'm afraid you don't have anyone to ask more questions. Okay. I would like to just acknowledge all of you and I want all of you to remember the significance of the roles that you have taken. A nation is built by many people. We need engineers, we need doctors, we need politicians, we need various kinds of people. Among all these people, the most significant thing about the generation that is next is the teachers. And everything that you do today will blossom probably after your life is over. And this is the significance of human nature that we are not looking at, we did this today, this today it has to come back to me. It's not a business transaction that you're planting seeds which will blossom well after your time.  I've heard such fabulous things about the Kendravidyalaya's, I've met many of your students, whether they were under you or your predecessors and many of them who are successful in various parts of the world always look back on their experience of Kendravidyalaya as a stabilizing factor in their lives. So thank you very much for having me here. In whichever way we can be of assistance to this whole moment of schools which are over 1200, I heard we are always willing to do that for you if you want any kind of a simple form of yoga, rupa yoga for the children which I feel is very, very fundamental to bring a more stable chemistry in the child because that is a time when children are going through your handling children whose chemistry is changing rapidly beyond their understanding. It's very important there are systems to stabilize that change, not to suppress that change, but to stabilize that change. So in whichever way we can serve you we are always available for you. I'm deeply, deeply humbled to be with so many of you here. Thank you very much.


I contact with a subject down in the street. Consensual contact if you will. He's talking to subject search and I'm for any weapons or anything like that. He's able to keep his partner in a downstate command. And Jett will not rape that downstate unless Deputy Rosner verbally directs him or if Deputy Rosner is attacked. Fuck.  This is a little information for you guys. Jett, these dogs on average, they're approximately 15 pounds. The pressure is pretty slight. So even the ball that was put in, the ball that was put in, the decoys can still feel a lot of pressure. And what Deputy Rosner was able to do, he was able to get Jett to let go from the first bad guy and redirect him to our other bad guy. What Jett's going to do right now is he's going to circle around and he's going to try to find somebody else to put that seam on because, like I said, all he wants to do is keep playing. This is aggression coming from the ball. If you guys can see, it's still flagging. He's not growling. He's not angry in any way towards our...


Hey, what's going on? I am Greg Sosman joined today by Jim Sanis of Fandall who's here to finally talk about some football What's happening Jim? I'm excited Greg because it's like mid-August already and I've barely talked any NFL So it feels a little weird, but it feels right. So I'm ready to dive on in and talk about some mid-range guys with upside Quite honestly, I have a draft this weekend. So I need all the help that I can get I talked to you a little bit about it on Friday and now I need to go full-on and do it right now So let's talk about some of these mid-round players that you can get and have a little bit of upside It's exactly what you're looking for. These are the kind of guys that a lot people refer to as league winners So let's go over them. We'll begin with Karim Hunt of the Cleveland Browns who right now has an ADP around 56 and a half So you're getting them much later than you're getting Nick Chubb And I was just saying before we started that I feel like Karim Hunt's all the rage right now and Nick Chubb's kind of falling a little bit Are you one of these Karim Hunt truthers or do you believe that they can coexist both Hunt and Chubb in Cleveland? I think they can coexist mostly because we saw them coexist last year And the problem is that it didn't go well for Nick Chubb And it went pretty well for Karim Hunt especially relative to cost because we look at just those eight games in those eight games Karim Hunt 5.4 carries per game, but also 5.5 targets per game We talked a lot about this Greg about the value of targets in the half PPR scoring setting because a target is worth twice as much as a carry So even though Karim Hunt getting like, you know 10 or so opportunities per game He's still a double digit half PPR points in five of those eight games And he had at least five points in every single game So what you're getting of Karim Hunt is a player who has a weekly floor and an overall season long floor as well But there's also a path to a bigger ceiling which we don't usually get for guys in this mid-round because like If Karim Hunt gets additional carries on early downs that could give him a ceiling or is something where to happen to Nick Chubb It's a weird season, you know something could always happen for sure That could give Karim Hunt this bell cow type workload and in this offense that would probably be pretty sweet So I think that those that's one path upside The other one is that there's been some discussion around using Karim Hunt as the Browns number three wide receiver at times That would be really enticing getting both him and Chubb on the field at the same time So multiple paths to a ceiling for Karim Hunt that is included with that floor as well So, you know in the middle of the fifth round, you're not gonna find a lot of guys who have both a floor and a path upside Karim Hunt actually has two paths to upside. So I think even though he is all the rage right now He is a pretty popular name He's still someone who I think is undervalued So if we get the same the same usages last year sweet, I'll take it If we get something even better, he could be a guy like you said who could have a league-winning type upside I want that every time I can get in the fifth round and Karim Hunt gets me exactly that I hear you and that's what everyone else is talking about Jim, right? What Karim Hunt did at the end of last year how frustrating it was that Nick Chubb didn't play on third downs That Nick Chubb was really failing at the goal line so they kept giving the ball to Karim Hunt But I do want to throw this back at you because it's a new coaching staff the failures of Freddie kitchen are gone And you bring in a different coach who certainly has had success running the football in Minnesota And he wonder if he has the same opinions that Freddie Kitchens did which makes me wonder about the value of Karim Hunt and the splitting playing time between Hunt and Nick Chubb Yeah, I think that's definitely a concern But the flip way to view Kevin Sifansky is a guy who is willing to use his best players And we saw that with Irv Smith last year where the Vikings when they realized that they had a legit talent in both Their tight ends decided to go with more two tight end sets. What if they do the same thing with Karim Hunt? Using him as either a wide receiver I mean that they use Karim Hunt as a fullback at times last year I can see a similar situation happening this year So I think that you could view it that way But the other way to view it is that we could get Karim Hunt in unique usage and potentially at an even higher snap rate this year And I think that that's what's enticing to me So there are some potential pass-on failures Maybe the floor not as good on Karim Hunt as perceived, but I think with those upsides being there I will still take even a slightly decreased floor just because of the upsides are so sweet Of course, league-winning upside here in the middle rounds for Karim Hunt That ceiling is high enough that he can win it all for you Draft Karim Hunt on draft day Moving on to the wide receivers here, Jim I get to Marquis Brown, another incredibly popular name among everybody Like Karim Hunt and Hollywood Brown are two of the most popular sleepers, if you will That you could draft in the middle rounds because everyone saw the upsides for both of these guys last year And Hollywood Brown started at the beginning, started in that first game And now he's completely healthy and he's gained some weight and he knows the rigors of the NFL season Everybody's in on Hollywood Brown And yet his ADP hasn't risen, I think, as much as many people expected What is, I guess, the floor for Marquis Brown? I think that the floor is similar to what we saw last year where he has these pop games but also has a lot of disappointing games And I think that that is definitely a risk with Hollywood Brown So for comparing him to Karim Hunt, I think that the floor is lower on Marquis Brown than on Karim Hunt But there were a lot of things working against Marquis Brown last year You mentioned the injuries, that was one thing There was also game flow because the Ravens were up like 41-0 at halftime on a good number of teams When that happens, you're not going to use a guy who was banged up You're not going to use a guy who's had these injuries You're not going to throw the ball at all So those were a couple of things working against Marquis Brown In addition to the fact that he was a rookie learning the ropes in the NFL But now, no longer a rookie, you're hoping at least that the injuries will not be there Those are two things that could swing towards his favor this year I'm not expecting the game flow to totally be in his favor But it might be better than it was last year if the Ravens play a more competitive game So potentially two of three or maybe even three of three things working against him May not work against him last year Remember last year, Marquis Brown played at least 70% of the snaps in just four games across the entire season He still had 20% of the targets in the games that he did play So still, even when we don't take out the games where his snap rate was super low He still got a healthy number of targets A lot of those were downfield And I think the biggest indicator of what we could see out of Marquis Brown this year came In their playoff game because they took the reins off He was healthy for that game and Marquis Brown went nuts 11 targets, 126 yards And I think that we're not going to expect to see that every game this year But if we get the leash taken off There is the potential for him to have those pop games that he had more regularly than he did Maybe we'll still see the down games where the Ravens get up big early and he's not involved in that time But if we can get more pop games, you can definitely take that downside as well So I think that the floor here definitely, you know There are some concerns if things repeat themselves if he gets hurt again Stuff like that But the upsides if he's healthy and if they pass a bit more are really fun We're taking AJ Brown at pick 42 but Hollywood Brown is going to pick 64 I think they have pretty similar concerns So if I'm going to take a risk on someone with some volume concerns Give me Hollywood 20 picks later with similar upside Two players in AJ Brown and Marquis Brown that have the ability to go off at any moment What the ADP says Marquis Brown is going 20 picks later, as Jim just described I will also take that upside 20 picks later The value is clearly there The pop games are also going to be there It's just a consistency that we have to question But at this price is what we're selecting on draft day One final player to mention and this is the one I'm almost most intrigued to talk to you about Because no one's talking about Christian Kirk We get it Deandre Hopkins is with Arizona now Larry Fitzgerald is a Hall of Famer And then you have Christian Kirk who I think if Deandre Hopkins wasn't in Arizona Well, we'd be talking about Kirk just like we're talking about Hollywood Brown He said Hopkins is there and Fitzgerald's role is solidified Sure Kyler Murray is like yeah, we're going to have three 1,000 yard receivers this year It's a lot easier said than done I will mention that we have a lot of fantasy insiders describing that Deandre Hopkins's Targets are going to go down Which could mean well Christian Kirk's targets go down also Because Hopkins is now in play A lot of question marks surrounding the Arizona offense And the wide receiver position specifically Christian Kirk Who right now is going at pick 88 Yeah, I think Greg a lot of times we think we know more than we do When it comes to these situations Christian Kirk going at pick 88 Kind of assumes that his target share will go down a lot From where it was last year and that could very well happen Like there's a reason that his cost has gone down Deandre Hopkins is really freaking good and that the Cardinals are smart They will funnel a lot of targets his way But Christian Kirk also pretty good too And I think we can forget how good his usage was When he was healthy last year and the games that Christian Kirk played He had 24% of the teams overall targets and 33% of the deep targets So he's not going to get there this year Because Deandre Hopkins is there and again they should go that way But if we give him 20% of the overall targets And about 30% of the deep targets in an offense That could be high faced or high paced Could be efficient and could throw the ball quite a bit That's still a lot of juice for pick 88 So yeah, we could see things happening Where Christian Kirk's volume goes down a good amount Maybe he doesn't get the same target share as last year That's probably going to happen But you know, it's also a new offense for Deandre Hopkins Christian Kirk is a young player who has performed well In his two seasons in the NFL and is on an offense We want to get exposure to because of the potential that they have With their pace and with their potential for efficiency So sure, you can pay the bill on Deandre Hopkins, Kenyon Drake or Kyler Murray But instead you can get exposure to this Cardinals offense By taking Christian Kirk at pick 88 And personally with the floor that he has Of getting the number two wide receiver And a fast paced heavy pass offense I think that's a good floor And there's the potential for much more If things don't shake out the way we expect them to From a target share perspective So again, getting a good floor But also a path to a better ceiling and exposure Cheap exposure to a good offense I'll take that every day So Christian Kirk, I think where he's going Is kind of a no brainer target for me You use a lot in DFS, right? Specifically baseball, which we've been talking about Where you'll go to course field And you'll just take the cheapest option, right? Rather than necessarily paying up for a Trevor Story Or a Nolan Arnato Instead, you get somebody cheaper That just happens to be there A Cole Calhoun of Arizona is there, for instance That's what we've talked about recently For Christian Kirk, it's the same type of model You don't have to pay up for Deandre Hopkins Or Kenyon Drake or Kyler Murray You guys are going the first three, four rounds of your draft Instead, you wait to pick 88 And you get a Christian Kirk Who certainly showed the ability Last year to be a big time fantasy contributor And now he's cost you less than we ever imagined And I think those big time fantasy contributions Are still on the table That's the type of player you're getting with Christian Kirk There's a lot of question marks around Arizona But what we do know is You want a piece of that offense Christian Kirk is the cheapest way to do it Let's draft Kirk on draft day There you have it, Jim Those are the three middle round guys That, well, they could really pay off And give you big dividends on draft day We appreciate the time Good luck in your drafts Thank you, Greg Good luck to you and your draft as well Looking forward to talking more NFL with you In the very near future Absolutely, it is going to be a ton of fun I'm learning every day I'm adjusting the rankings constantly As soon as we hang up Christian Kirk going up Just for the record We appreciate the time For Jim Stonis, I am Greg Sussman Thanks so much for watching Good luck, everybody And we'll see you tomorrow For another edition But the fans will hurry up


Describe the advantages of developing domestic sources of energy as opposed to importing energy from other countries. There are both benefits and costs to having a primarily domestic energy supply versus relying on international markets. If the domestic energy supply is cheap and abundant, then there's no reason to go to international markets. If domestic energy supply is less cheap or less abundant, then there still may be benefits because countries can lower their exposure to global price fluctuations or other geopolitical risks by developing energy resources domestically rather than going internationally.


Welcome to ITU Telecom World 2017 here in Busan in the Republic of Korea, where I'm very pleased to be joined today by the Honourable George Ninyangya, who is Deputy Minister for Communications. Mr. Andar, thank you very much for being with us in the studio today. Thank you. Thanks for having us here. I'm Ganesh Privileged and we are honoured and humbled to be given this opportunity to engage with you. Well, we're very pleased indeed to have you here. Now, the theme for this year's event has been smart digital transformation. What does it mean in Ghana? Well, in Ghana we say it's digital time. His Excellency the President keeps on saying that he wants Ghana to become the most business friendly and the most people friendly economy on the continent. And obviously everything like this is going to run on the back of solid technology. So when we're talking about the theme, I think it's very, it's in sync and it's consistent with what Ghana believes in. All our services are from, you're talking about the health sector, you're talking about our Greek, you're talking about housing, you're talking about transportation, you're talking about education, you're talking about security. The backbone that all these services are going to run on in the future is technology. And I think it's just apt that the theme fits into what Ghana is doing. So once we're seeing this digital time in Ghana, we're looking at the national ID system, we're looking at the housing address system, we're looking at paperless offices, we're looking at the government services. And then it's interesting that at the port just one week after we had introduced paperless transactions, our revenue increased by 56% year on year.  So it's a good time, I mean we are fully in sync with the theme and we are actually practicing it in Ghana. That's brilliant. And what do you think are the major challenges and opportunities over the next five years, let's say, in terms of the digital technologies? I mean, there are a number of challenges that I envisage, I mean, one would be people resisting change, people used to doing things in a different way and now having to use technology and they feel like it's a bit difficult for them to change their old habits, but I mean that is normal, we have to keep on engaging them. The other thing is to make sure that we have the right policies, we have the right regulatory framework to make sure that we are ready for the takeoff that is happening. There's a bit of infrastructure that needs to be put on the ground, we need to make sure that we have the right infrastructure at the right place, delivering the right solutions to all the players of the ecosystem. And I think one other thing is to make sure that we are building the right capacity, we are building the right skills, we are building the right competencies in our people for them to be able to take advantage of the whole digitization process. As far as the benefits are concerned, I think it's a no-brainer, it's a better way of doing business, a better way of living. The vision of the president, making sure that Ghana becomes the most business-friendly and the most people-friendly economy on the continent. Once you go into detail, then it means that your taxation processes are better monitored, the way the companies are registering, you take down from entertainment to the ways of doing business and everything is going to be transformed. The benefits are clear, we came to Busan and we are seeing the benefits of a smart city. Very soon our crowd should become a smart city and I think that there's no, it's not negotiable, it's not negotiable, we are quite excited and we are ready for that opportunity as well. What about e-government services, how's Ghana working towards those? Well at the moment we've launched a number of e-government services, there's e-parliament, so the members of parliament are working smart, it's not 100% complete, but we are almost there, there's e-immigration, so there's database that's being collected quickly, people are being cleared at the ports, their travel experience is much better, so I mean there are a number of e-services that are on plan and we are in a good place to deliver these experiences to the right stakeholders. And finally, we talked a little bit about you attending this event, it's quite a way to get here and obviously it's been an investment for Ghana to be here with the pavilion etc. What's the value of attending events such as ITU Telecom World? I think there are a number of benefits, I mean the first one of course is a network and opportunity, making sure that we are in line with the new technologies that are being discussed, making sure that we are connected to the right organisations, the right people, we brought some SMEs over, making sure that they also have an opportunity to engage with other ex-bitters, making sure that they can engage with other potential businesses and I think for me the other thing was to try and get into the right way of doing things, you learn from the countries that are taking the step forward and we want to leap from these things, so there's an opportunity to ask the right questions and to set up the right meetings and of course as far as Ghana is concerned, we are putting ourselves up for renomination on the Executive Council and it's a great opportunity for us to show the rest of our colleagues what we are capable of doing, what we are doing in the country and the reason why they should give us an opportunity to serve on the Council. Certainly sounds like you're doing great things. Deputy Minister George Nenienda, thank you very much indeed for being here. Thanks for the opportunity and take care of yourself too. Thank you.


this nice surprise and nice change out of the blue I just saw a little person running across my you're going to think I'm mad and I've not been on anything I promise you but there was something that ran across my and it wasn't a mouse it was a person a little person oh sorry sorry but anyway there's going to be something it's going to come out of the blue


What is your average annual commission, right? Per cell. So if, if, let's just see, right? Let's just, let's just see what your average annual commission is, right? Let's just say that it's $667. And again, this will apply to anything. It doesn't matter what you're selling. I may use life insurance all the time, but I don't care if you're selling employee benefits, health insurance, Medicare, property and casualty, annuities, does not matter. This system can work for you. $667. Okay, so if you take 667 times 150 cells, what do you get? What do you think you get, right? What do you think you get? Everything good, video and audio, SD. $100,000, right? I'm going to show you guys on my calculator so you can see that I'm not lying. $100,000 divided by 150 cells. We just talked about all the numbers, right? I'm a big believer in breaking them down. 666.66 so that I didn't say just... So you round that up, that's 667, right? $667 per cell. But you've got to figure out what yours is, and the reason I say figure out what yours is, is because you need to be taking 100k divided by whatever your average cell is, right? Average commission. And that'll tell you the number of insurance policies that you need to write. And then you can take that divided by 50 weeks and if it's only 100, then you just need two a week, right? So figure out what the math is. Or if you're already making 100k, this can help you make a quarter of a million dollars. No doubt about it.


And now, an Ig Nobel Prize favorite moment with Pico Todd. You're just too good to be true. In 2004, I was the monodomo for Daisuke Inoue, who won the Peace Prize for having invented karaoke. In his acceptance speech, he sang, I want to teach the world to sing to the audience. And then, in turn, he was serenaded by the Nobel laureates and then the entire Sanders Theatre audience with, You're just too good to be true.  Drop the mic. The Ig Nobel Prizes honor achievements that make people laugh, then think. This historic Ig Nobel favorite moment video stars Pico Todd, who was a minor domo in many Ig Nobel Prize ceremonies. The 30th first annual Ig Nobel Prize ceremony will be webcast September 17th, 2020. Details about the Ig Nobel Prizes can be found at www.improbable.com.


Item Number SCP-067 Object Class Safe Special Containment Procedures When not in use or the subject of study, SCP-067 is to be stored in its felt-lined wooden box. The nib is to be corked, and all art and writings are to be submitted to SCP Research Command for analysis and further experimentation. Description SCP-067 is a fountain pen made by a German supply company called Pelican at some point between World War I and II. It is pale green in color, with a single red line going straight down along the side. The shell is oak, and the nib is extremely sharp, capable of piercing human skin if pressed even lightly. Though it apparently lacks a reservoir, the nib never appears to run out of fresh ink. In addition, the pen writes an iron gall ink, which is suitable for artists, but would normally corrode typical fountain pens quickly. Research has surmised that any subject holding SCP-067 loses all autonomy of the hand and arm that grasps it. Full sensation is intact, but the arm below the elbow is controlled by unknown forces, theoretically centralized within SCP-067. One effect is that the controlled hand will start to use the pen to write a detailed biography of the individual holding the pen. This biography will include such information as the person's name, age, date of birth, criminal record, fears, etc. Other times, the pen has been known to write such things as an occurrence that happened in the person's lifetime. For example, when Test Subject 1204M held SCP-067, he began to write a detailed record of a motor vehicle accident he had been in the year before. Later, the subject admitted that many details penned in the account were not readily available to him at present time. I.e., the subject had forgotten many elements present in the written work, including his previous car's license plate number, the other vehicle's color, and so on. The subject stated that his memory of the event was so fresh in his mind during the transcription that he could taste the blood in his mouth. Subjects holding SCP-067 have also been known to create intricate works of art, despite the subject lacking any formal art training or previous tendencies toward drawing. For example, Test Subject 1102F, a young woman with no previous artistic experience, was able to draw a winged creature resembling SCP-067 described by researchers present as data-expunged. When the subjects are asked to explain what happens when they hold SCP-067, the typical response is that the subject freely relinquishes control of their appendage to SCP-067 so that it may complete its work unimpeded. Despite being instructed to not draw or write, subjects describe feelings of empathy, admiration, and cooperation with SCP-067 that coerces them toward a will not their own. Quoted response 1, I don't really know how to explain it, it just kind of happened. When I picked up the pen, it seemed as if my hand wasn't my own anymore. I knew I could move it if I wanted to, but I chose not to because I loved the picture I was drawing. It was like my hand had life.  I looked at the drawing and saw how beautiful it was. I guess the pen decided it was done and was finished with me. Tests and Experiments A test was done to see how the pen affected living creatures other than humans. Experiment 001, The Test Subject A male rhesus macaque aged two years four months who had previously learned how to use pens and markers was placed in a standard psychological surveillance room. Neutral wall coloration, one-way observation mirrors. With SCP-067, a work table, and a pad of paper. Subject picked up SCP-067 in his left foot, then took it in his right hand, then tasted it. Subject then put the pen down on the paper and smelled it. After 30 seconds, Subject picked up SCP-067 again and began tapping it repeatedly on the table. Subject also began tapping SCP-067 on his own body. Subject tapped SCP-067 with increasing force until ink was being splattered on his fur. Subject then threw SCP-067 onto the floor. Subsequent mechanical analysis revealed no damage. At this point, Subject tore a page from the pad of paper and began rubbing it on the ink in his fur. This continued for three minutes, after which Subject clutched the page in his teeth and leaped from the work table onto the ledge of the observation mirror with such force that the table was knocked over. Subject began smearing the ink from the paper onto the observation mirror while making repeated vocalizations. Subsequent analysis revealed that 50% of vocalizations were consistent with the typical distress vocalizations of the rhesus macaque and 50% were unfamiliar. After six minutes of smearing ink on the observation mirror, Subject began tearing at the page with his teeth and claws but dropped it before destroying more than 20% of the paper. Subject then collapsed on the floor, breathing rapidly and repeating the unfamiliar atypical vocalizations. Subject's handler reports that, once removed from psychological surveillance room, Subject's mood improved rapidly. Subject was closely observed for two months following the experiment but did not repeat the atypical vocalizations. The sheaf of paper was filed away. In data expunged. Lesson complete. If you missed the previous orientation, go watch SCP-066, Eric's toy, right now. Or for the complete course, watch this playlist.


Welcome traders to another tick mill intraday wave analysis session with me Patrick Munley. I want to draw your attention to a sequence developing on the four hour time frame in gold. We have a potential impulsive decline developing here and what we're looking to do or what I'm looking to do is join the wave four peak and and trade down into a wave five objective. So the wave three, the interim wave three has completed here, subdivided nicely, a little bit of divergence into the low. So this sets up now an equality objective versus the swing low here, the B low at 17-72 up into the 1800 level. Watch for bearish reversal patterns here. Set short positions targeting and move down to test 17-40 as a fifth wave. Equality objective. The invalidation point for this setup would be above 18-18. As always traders, plan the trade, trade the plan, manage your risk.