What's good George Boros back again with another video so we're gonna check out 10 dreadful wrestling tropes that need to die There should be a very interesting one wrestling tropes have been a part of the wrestling business obviously for a very long time Some of them make sense for example when you have a tag team match and a wrestler is crawling And they're trying to get to their teammate even though they just hit a move where they were just standing up They're like so out of energy. Yes, it is a trope that we've seen so many times But the psychology for it for the fans in attendance It gets the fans riled up the other person on the other side of the turnbuckle Trying to hype up the crowd and you know trying to extend his hand to finally get the tag And then just at the last minute they jump and they tag their partner and then you get that hot tag and the crowd is Amped up. Yes, it's kind of silly when you think about it. It happens pretty much all the time in tag team wrestling matches, but It makes sense to get the crowd and invest it's part of the psychology on the match So it would be interesting if that's on the list because I do think that's appropriate But let's see what else is on the list that People feel like shouldn't be on shouldn't be a thing anymore in wrestling appreciate our love sport If the majority of wrestling fans had it their way you can bet that each and every one of the following frustrating Uninspired and all kinds of dumb tropes would be permanently terminated from the business altogether after watching this very list So with that in mind Wrestling and here are 10 dreadful wrestling tropes that need to die Number 10 kick out at 2.999 after a move that never works not all desperate kickouts are equal Seemingly impossible explosion of energy from an almost certainly finished person writers victory was slipping away They're sadly a far more common visual of a wrestler fully believing They've sealed a win with a move only for their adversary to inevitably escape defeat later on the likes of Sami Zayn and Seth Rollins with their blue Thunderbomb and Falcon arrow combo respectively have been the most notable offenders over the years if these stars simply Accepted that the move in question was never gonna get the job done folks could probably forgive the odd Instinctive pin attempt with the fact these workers continually slap the most artificial imaginable on their foolish mugs in the aftermath has turned this one into a hugely annoying Wrestling trope. What is your favorite signature move? Let me know and that's that's a fair point because they barely win with those moves It would be different if they built those moves up and I wish And just more wrestling companies would do this It's okay if the signature move puts away somebody I'm okay with that. I'm okay with certain moves put no it don't always have to be a finisher Sometimes a signature move is just as devastating looking and to put away up an opponent do that I think recently Kevin Owens on this recent episode of Smackdown, I think it was one of the qualifying matches Yeah, I believe it was against Dominic Um, he hit I think he hit him with the pop-up powerbomb He didn't even hit him with his new finisher the stunner. He hit him with the pop-up powerbomb and won the match That's perfect. Have these wrestlers have if they have cool signatures They don't have to always win with their finishers because that way when someone does kick out their finisher Then it's like damn now. I gotta now means when someone keeps out the signature Damn it. They can sell the the the shock. I damn they kicked out I may have to use my finisher and then the quack my damn they kicked out of that He's gonna have to use his finisher So it adds the extra layer of anticipation for the actual finisher So yeah, they should start doing that more on the comment section right down below Number nine the you people rants one week after turning heel Every babyface's decision to turn their back on the life of a good guy or girl That's sudden attitude adjustment will be swiftly followed by a monologue blasting all of you people in attendance and watching around the world Take jungle boy Jack Perry's first real heel moments on the mic earlier this year For example just a few days after finally snapping at forbidden door and turning on his pal hook The AW pillar had swiftly shifted from slightly frustrated underdog face to a completely Irritating and trope stuffed villain the entire thing felt like a parody more than a game-changing character shift Perry isn't alone, of course this sort of unoriginal targeting of the audience and tropey post-turn promo has become the stale norm nowadays Number eight a dive to the outside. Yeah, here's the thing not every heel has to have this innate hate for the fans all of a sudden It depends on the character depends on why they turned he'll sometimes a person for example Drew what they've done with his heel turn It's been great because he hasn't he's not doing this all you people have turned on me No, he's looking at himself as the savior of WrestleMania he's looking at himself as the good guy, but he's doing bad things He's being a hypocrite and that's what works That's a perfect heel turn he's a he's a he's an asshole, but He's not blaming the people. He thinks he's helping the people. He thinks he's doing great He thinks he's the good guy in his story. That's really all a heel is someone that feels like they're the good guy in their own story So That's a fair assessment when you start getting into the you people tropes. Yeah, come on now You was just just hugging all the babies last week now. It's you people make me sick I'd means a commercial is coming your way What's the easiest way to tell of a two-minute chunk of fast-food marketing is heading your way mid-wrestling show Why your favorite in-ring workers opting to chuck their bodies outside of the squared circle of course more often than not leads to an Advertisement or two pulling you away from the action This particular trope has become so terribly predictable Bands even find themselves feeling a little uneasy when a tope doesn't force their experience into a tiny square for a few minutes on Pay-per-view would it be so bizarre to simply hot to a burger king advert seconds after a performer just about survives being choked Slammed right down to hell. Well apparently so number seven I have hit you with you definitely do see that a lot more and I ain't gonna lie to you They that's how they set it up and goes through the through the ropes hit someone and then gets back into the ring And then they cut to commercial break so that that's another fair one to this weapon Now we must have a match with this weapon You didn't need this list to tell you that the wonderful world a professional wrestling isn't half a silly one at the best of times and the way Many a vicious stipulation encounter has found itself being booked on an incoming pay-per-view or PLE Just look at this year's double or nothing pay-per-view right before a surprising ladder match between himself and the despicable Christian cage was made official for the May 28th show You'll never guess what big bad Wardlow was randomly batted with on dynamite It was painfully obvious where all this was going before the then TNT champion opted to challenge the patriarch of AEW to the Stipped-up pay-per-view war the fact weapons-based contests are still occasionally being set up in this not exactly creative way in 2023 is unquestionably disappointing number six the Royal Rumble season top rope nonsense season is right around the corner And you know what that means just about every single person who isn't involved in a title match at that January PLE It's about to be spending a month attempting to avoid being tossed over the top rope why well because Michael Cole and Corey Graves Need to be able to remind fans who have been Decade or so exactly what the rules of the incoming Royal Rumble contests are silly Even if you are tuning into WWE programming for the very first time right now There's a solid chance she'll be able to figure out what said routinely gripping bout involves by simply watching one of the Many rumble highlight packages online, but no that is simply not enough folks You must watch people fly over the top rope for five to six weeks number five distraction roll-ups WWE don't half love the sight of distracted performers being rolled up out of nowhere the idea behind the most devastating move in all of sports Entertainment distraction combo salute to the mighty Simon Miller is that this annoying trope of a finish protects both of the Individuals involved in theory the winner comes away with an all-important victory and loser is given a justification for failing to defeat their foe In reality though, this cheap conclusion does little to nothing for anyone I'm pretty much renders the entire bout as pointless Yeah Nobody really wins cleanly or in a way that properly helps their character grow slash get more over with a crowd Then surely everyone just loses right number four cheap city And that that that's that's a fair one I it always baffles me how someone could be they get distracted and then they get hit with an easy roll up I'm like damn, bro Like you it's like you forgot you were in an actual match with someone that's trying to beat you up And all because someone came out ringside instead of just still focusing what's happening now It's different they get on the ring apron and they distract the ref Okay, that's different But just them walking out or you hear their music. Oh, you see it, but you still focus on the match I've always felt that was kind of silly right there I'm bro. They they lost a match because a person was standing outside the ring or up at the ramp and They just lost all awareness of what's going on this it's fucking funny reference heel slash babyface pops taking a quick look at the name of the town slash city on the schedule that week I'm thinking one of their many sports teams before then either crapping on or celebrating said foot basket baseball squad The cheap saluting or blasting of whatever country or city a performer finds themselves performing in will never not be dull to just watch Anywhere else now sure there's the odd Sensational exception Elias and Kevin Owens outrageously loud Seattle bashing remains iconic There have been far more examples of wrestlers chucking out deeply unimaginative Compliments and criticisms at the place. They're standing in over the years number three two enemies are And sometimes it can work sometimes it works like Kevin Owens on a live situation and sometimes it's just like ah But we understand why it's done For viewers watching on TV is like, uh, okay, but for people in the arena It gets it's able to get that cheap heat to you know, get the get the crowd, you know Active so I understand why it's done, but it can be annoying to see Especially if it doesn't really get that much of a reaction anyway, so again, but can they coexist? For every MJF and Adam Cole or salt of the earth and Samoa Joe example of enemies being forced to coexist in a tag Environment and making it work. There has still been the odd frustrating time when the likes of WB and AEW Have opted to chuck enemies into a unit together just for the pair to inevitably turn on each other at some point Into this year's WrestleMania WB stupidly opted to have two of their best workers in the women's division Just bicker a little in a tag bout before ask her obviously targeted her partner raw women's champion Bianca Belair Before the biggest PLE of the year no epic or unexpected story Just talented women who couldn't get along before a mania contest But simply despite the occasional Coexisting hit most would be happy to see this done to death trope Super kicked out of the business entirely heading into 2024. I would definitely love to see that trope get done away it should it You know what's gonna happen. Someone's gonna betray each other or whatever It's it's a tired trope I really do wish they would do away with that because you're not surprising anybody will they won't they coexist? No one cares they're about to fight each other for the championship or whatever in the upcoming pay-per-view. Who cares? Who cares? To powering through the goon gauntlet to get to the heel leader Sports entertainment and the elite alternative have often become obsessed with chucking their baby faces Into gruelling battles which see them having to overcome a number of the heels pals in order to get their hands on a glorious Opportunity either to face their bitter enemy or challenge for a strap the concept was strong for a time But after watching what feels like 300 of them in different shapes and sizes go down on a WTV in particular over the last few years It's safe to say the majority of all elite lovers would prefer it if the fighting through Jericho Appreciation societies in one night was stripped away from the modern wrestling product WTV seems to have a habit of booking this sort of predictable road to a champion or top villain team With the likes of Gunter and Roman Reigns often making their enemies battle against their Imperium or bloodline allies Before they can share the ring with real greatness number one mid-match That's a double-edged sword because that's the whole purpose why you have a group or a faction So the top guy can be protected and everyone else are the lackeys the flunkies and they're there to Provide a barrier before the the guy gets to the ultimate boss So I understand why it happens. I mean that's usually right now in wrestling the top guys Outside of a few individuals But the top guys usually have a team of people to help them Not everybody but that's been kind of a trend and it's always been like that in wrestling to be honest with you the top bad guys Usually had a group of people to help them simple as that You have to kind of maneuver your way through these people that we're seeing it with Cody right now He's gonna have to get more help on his side of things to kind of maneuver his way to Really finally get that that true One-on-one with Roman Roman without as much, you know To neutralize his his bloodline as much as possible. So I get what he's saying But at the same time, I think it it it needs to be that way if you have a dominant strong keel You have a faction I think you have to do it that way because it doesn't make sense of all of a sudden He just goes for the boss and then all the lackeys are just there watching it happen What's the point of having them? You know, so I think this is the kind of a It has to kind of happen in certain instances On a login largely inspired by the tribal chief's insistence on creating magical cinema with all of the people sitting around his table Initially Roman Reigns leaning into the drama via verbal assault on the likes of J Uso and Kevin Owens during the Thunderdome era wasn't actually all that terrible However, the undisputed WWE Universal Champion opting to stick to cutting promos during an intense battle when live fans returned Led to many more taking a page out of Reigns's script Seth Rollins is another who simply cannot resist throwing in some additional exposition Remaining Shinsuke Nakamura that he brought his family into their feud and telling those watching at home the risk He takes bumping on a battered back. They know Seth the entire program told them for weeks Why bother telling that story through masterful selling and the layout of a contest when he can just spell it out to those silly fans via excruciating monologuing instead a I've been Gareth from what culture Watching this video today. Hopefully we'll see you again rather soon, but in the meantime just be good to yourself Yeah, I don't know about this one. I me personally. I'm okay with them talking trash like the heels talking trash Or they're kind of going back and forth like I'm okay with that It adds that layer of intensity to the actual match itself not saying that the entire times It should be like that it depends on the character Roman Reigns it fits him He's going to talk trash. He's been doing it. He's gonna keep doing it because he feels he's invincible So it's supposed to be like that It makes it that much better. I'm all for it So me personally, I don't know if I would have put this one at number one I think this is a trope that you could kind of work with Obviously, everyone shouldn't be doing it and it depends on the character and what's being said and why it's being said but At the same time, I do understand how some people can feel like all well, you know back in the day Wrestlers didn't really talk too much in the sense of talking trash during that match But at the same time you've seen clips of wrestlers doing that. So me personally, I don't know if I would have put this number one This has been a very interesting list. Some of these things on this particular list I wouldn't I don't feel like they're bad tropes. I feel like they're part of keeping the wrestling business the way it is and Not saying that it's a bad thing or you know, it's the best thing that's going on right now But I think it it works So I don't feel like some of the stuff needs to be taken away or change. So y'all comment down below Let me know what tropes you feel like should be kind of removed or died You know fought died back dialed back In the wrestling business as a whole because I feel like a lot on this particular list I wouldn't really have a problem with some of them make sense for sure like the the whole Teaming up with your enemy before you're about to bite them at the next pay-per-view. Yes, please get rid of that It doesn't create that much story unless it makes sense to do that Most of the shit most of the time it doesn't so get rid of that for sure But comment down below Let me know some other tropes you feel like could have been on this list or should have been on this list that you feel Like yeah, let's get rid of it But I appreciate all the love and support wrote 250k and I'm still gonna speak to you to rest in the champion world I appreciate y'all can't hear me. See you next one. Peace


Hi everyone, we are continuing our discussion in section 6.2 the characteristic polynomial from the textbook linear algebra done openly and in this part The end part of section 6.2 I want to talk about the idea of similarity and this notion is going to start to kind of explain why Amongst many reasons we are interested in Eigen values and eigenvectors in the first place. So imagine we have two square matrices a and b They're both in by in we say that the two matrices are similar if there exists some non singular in by in matrix P Such that P a P inverse B. Sorry P a P inverse is equal to B So that is we can factor the matrix B and have a as a factor But there has to be these non singular Factors right here. Of course non singularity is required for the matrix P. Otherwise P inverse doesn't matter. It doesn't exist But the matrices a and B themselves do not have to be Non-singular they could be singular matrices. I do want to mention though that this equation right here It could be rewritten as P a is equal to P B One has to be very careful about the order of operations You can't just commute the matrices willy-nilly. And so let me give you an example of of a Similar matrices here. So let's take the matrix a which is this three by three matrix one zero negative seven five one two negative four two zero and take this other matrix B Which is also three by three fifteen negative eighteen negative two seventeen negative seventeen negative four seven negative twenty two and four right there And I claim that these two matrices are similar to each other How do we know that well to check that two matrices are similar you have to choose this? Connector right this connecting matrix P, which will be non singular And we kind of put them together, right? So let's say that P Is this three by three matrix right here one negative two negative one one negative one zero one negative four negative two This is a non-singular matrix. In fact, it's inverse matrix I provided right here as well two zero negative one two negative one negative one and negative three two and one and If you want to pause the video and multiply P with P inverse and you'll see that this gives you the three by three identity These that this is the real McCoy. This is a non-singular matrix and so Putting these together now, right if we take P times a times P inverse I'm not writing the details out here because it takes a little bit while to write them out You can see them right here if you take P times a times P inverse Let's first consider P a Sorry a P inverse, right if you multiply those together take the first row with the first column You'll end up with two plus zero plus 21 that gives us a 23 Continue on we'll do the first row second column, right? We end up with zero zero negative 14 You see right there and continue to do all of the details all of the details going on right there You end up with this matrix right here. This is our AP inverse All right, and again pause the video if you want to double-check these calculations yourselves And then when you multiply these two matrices together, right? You take the first the first row one negative two Negative one multiply by the first column. We're gonna get 23 minus 12 Plus four which is equal to 15 first row second column. We know how to do this by now You're gonna get negative 14 minus 6 plus 2 that adds up to be negative 18 And so if you go through this fat if you go through this matrix multiplication Voila, you see that we've recaptured the matrix B This 15 negative 18 negative 2 etc etc and so this shows us that a and B are similar and we'll often to note This is a is similar to B or something like that, right? They're similar to each other and so there's a relationship that these these matrices are connected in some way, right? This matrix P acts as the connector and a and B are related to each other The relationship that matters is actually this theorem right here if a and B are two similar matrices Then they have the same Characteristic polynomial and if they have the same characteristic polynomial They'll have the same eigenvalues and they'll show up with the same eigen or the same multiplicities Both geometric well, we're not well, they'll have the same algebraic multiplicities They'll have the same eigenvalues and so this is actually a very very useful result And the idea comes from the fact that if we look at the characteristic polynomial of a you get a minus Lambda I like this well the idea is you can factor this and you can multiply this by the determinant of P times the determinant of a minus lambda I times the determinant of P inverse now the I should note here that P the determinant of P times the determinant P inverse These things are reciprocals when you multiply them together. This actually is the number one So that's why equality is preserved and then by the multiplicative property of determinants this is the same thing as the determinant of P times a minus lambda I times P inverse which when you multiply those through you get the determinant of P a P inverse you'll get minus P lambda I P inverse like so and now P a P inverse this is none other than the matrix B since they were similar and this one right here lambda I this commutes with any matrix So you can bring those over here and you're gonna get P times P inverse which is equal to the identity itself And so this thing will simplify to be the determinant of B minus lambda I so two matrices are similar They'll have the exact same characteristic polynomial Now it's it's not fair to go the other way around if two matrices have the same characteristic polynomial That does not necessarily mean they are similar. There are other things to be considered in that But similar matrices will have the same characteristic polynomial Which means they will have the exact same eigenvalues, which is very nice But I want to caution you they will not necessarily have the same eigenvectors the eigenvectors Might change as you go from one similar matrix to another But this eigenvalues will be the same and it turns out the change of eigenvectors has a lot to do this connecting matrix P We'll talk about more of this in the next section of the textbook about diagonalization Now because the eigenvalues are the same There's going to be some some other things that are going to be the same about the matrices as well So I want to kind of mention here that if you're similar If you're similar, you're gonna have the same eigenvalues like we said They'll show up with the same the same algebraic multiplicities and all that type of stuff Of the same geometric multiplicities as well, but you'll also have the same determinant If if two matrices are similar, they'll have the same determinant And the main reason behind that is a very interesting observation that the determinant of the matrix like take the determinant of a This is just Evaluating the characteristic polynomial at zero Okay, and if you evaluate the characteristic polynomial at zero, you're gonna get the constant term of that polynomial And the constant term of a polynomial is going to equal the product The product of its roots Which is which is sort of an interesting observation to the terminate is equal to the product of eigenvalues So determinants and eigenvalues are very deeply connected to each other Which is pretty cool. Another thing that's even more stellar here is that if two matrices are similar They're gonna have the same trace Remember the trace is the sum of the diagonal and she's of a square matrix this was a little bit harder to convince yourself up but the trace is actually equal to the sum of The eigenvalues of the matrix, so they have the same eigenvalues. They'll have the same trace And yeah, that's that's kind of a phenomenal observation here And so these things we're talking about right here eigenvalues determinants traces These are all something called in variants. These are quantities properties of a matrix that do not vary If you switch from one matrix to a similar matrix So if you want to show that two matrices are similar what you want to show is that they they differ They differ on an invariant like their eigenvalues their Determinants or their trace the trace is one of the easiest ones to do so I often look for that one first If you take the matrix a here the trace of a is Equal just to be one minus two which is negative one on the other hand the trace of B That turns out to be three plus two which is equal to five And so if two matrices have different traces, which they do negative one over here and five over here That would imply that these things are not similar. So look at Look at the the trace of the matrix to see if they're not similar Look at the determinant and look at the eigenvalues some other things that are invariants Similar matrices will have the same rank They will have the same rank rank is an invariant of similarity. This will also mean they'll have the same nullity You can look at the nullity of the matrix And those are some other invariants that you should be aware of and so like in the homework For example, if you're trying to show the two matrices are not similar You look at invariants and see that they're different on invariants And this this is a very different thing of how we show that two matrices were similar Like we had over here two matrices are similar if you can find this connecting matrix But what if we can't find a connecting matrix? Is that because it doesn't exist or maybe because we're bad at finding it, right? What about Bigfoot for all I know Bigfoot is still running around the forest of California somewhere But people have been looking for Bigfoot and haven't found them But maybe Bigfoot is a warlock and he uses magic to conceal his location I don't know. I mean there could be reasons why we can't find them the reason so just because we can't find them Doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It just means that maybe we're bad at finding them, right? So we need a different argument to why two matrices are not similar and this idea of invariance is the strategy to go Show that to two matrices that vary on an invariant means they're not similar as the name invariant seems to suggest And then actually brings us to the end of our discussion here in 6.2 About characteristic polynomials on this section of the video. We're talking about similarity of matrices and such I do hope you've been enjoying these videos and learning a lot if you if you'd like to see more feel free to hit the like Button or the subscribe button Leave a comment behind if you have any questions stay tuned for section 6.3 about Diagonalization which will talk some more about this notion of similarity. I will see you all then Take care everyone


Welcome back to my channel guys. It's your girl Coco Styles and on this channel we talk about beauty, fashion, and lifestyle. But in today's video I'm going to show you guys how I style three midi full leather skirts. And these are kind of old guys but I will find something similar so you guys can kind of like pair it up and match it up the way you like. So let's just get started with the first outfit. And this is a skirt from Zara that I bought many moons ago in New York City. But if you do have a green army fatigue color skirt you can definitely pull something like this off. I do have it on with black boots but you can wear nude color boots if you like to lighten up the outfit. And I do have this top on from Zara as well. Something like this I would probably wear like this cute clutch. This is old too. This is from Zara as well. It's just like an army fatigue clutch. It has a little bit of gold detailing in it. And I absolutely love this clutch because it kind of goes with all of most of my things in my classics. I do like nude colors and greens and browns. So you would wear something like this if you like. You could also wear the black one. This is from Zara also. Now this clutch says sold out on it and I think I paid $30 for this. And I tell you every single time I wear this everybody asks me where did I get this clutch? Zara. So you can wear something like this and kind of like keep it really really simple. It does have silver detailing and so depending on if you mind you don't mind mixing hardware. You can kind of do gold and silver if you want it. And then my earrings I have on like this core. I don't know if you guys can see this. But I'm going to see if I can zoom in a little bit. These earrings they almost look like elephant tusk a little bit. And I got these from New York City. I'm from New York City but these I purchased from a lady on the street like African ladies. They have like beautiful accessories. Actually these bracelets I call these my Wonder Woman bracelets. I probably had these for over 15 years.  And the same for these gold earrings here. And these are pretty much the same.  Gold accessories. So this is outfit number one guys. Let me know what you guys think. Like I said you can style it with lighter color boots if you wanted. You could put on a hat if you decided it's changing the top. Let's see what else. You can wear a nude color top with it something like this. If you want it you can put a blazer over it. Maybe an ivory color blazer with gold buttons. You can wear pumps with this. So the options are endless. So if you do have a green skirt like this try something out like this. It's very simple, very classy. Nothing too much over the top and it's well put together. So I'll be back with the next outfit guys and I probably need to do the red one from Zara. Why don't you guys see how I would style that. So I'll be back guys. Welcome back guys. So I have on the red skirt now and same boots and I have on the Abercrombie and Fitch top. Listen guys I'm telling you get these bodysuits. They're amazing. They have a really long stretch at the bottom so it's not like super tight around the crotch area. I have trouble with bodysuits because I am tall. They don't usually fit me properly or they're a little bit too tight at the bottom. So I have this color. I have white. I have this nude color and I have this brown color. I think they were about 50 bucks 45 bucks but they were on sale and I think they have a sale now. So something like this I would style this like this. And if you guys notice I do not like super mini skirts and that's just because I just don't like them on me. I'm tall. I just think mini skirts look a little bit better. But the errands that I have on are a bit much but you could wear something like this if you wanted to. And if you really feel if you really are feeling yourself you can probably don't want a hat if you wanted to. You know seems like a bit much for me. However some people like the attention so you can probably wear a hat and you know kind of go from there. So that's how I would style this red skirt. It's not like a super bright red. It's more of a muted red. I like it a lot. I don't like super bright red like candy apple red. But something like this I think you can just style simple like this. Or if you want it again some people like to wear sneakers. You can wear white sneakers with this with a graphic tee. You can wear if you want to dress it up a white like dressy silk bodysuit if you want it. You could also throw on blazers with this if you decided to you know do that. But again the focus is the color of the skirt and the length of the skirts. So you guys can kind of get some ideas on everyday looks. So I'll be back with the next look in a second. Welcome back. So this is outfit number three and this is just a basic leather skirt. This is not a normal midi. It is a lot longer. It's almost up to past my knees. And again I'm six feet. So you can wear a black leather skirt with pretty much anything. A denim top. You can wear a denim jacket. You can wear a t-shirt. You can wear sneakers. You can dress it up. You can dress it down. And honestly any one of those you can do the same thing if you want it. I just have on some basic gold earrings. If you guys can see that basic gold and have on my gold my brass sorry my brass bracelets. And this is the other top from Abercrombie and Fitch. And I think that this is simple but yet cute. So if you were going out on a little lunch date maybe an evening date. You can wear something like this. I have on the same boots. So it's literally leather going straight down. If you want it you can toss it with you. Oh no guys blooper. You can possibly add on some sort of belt if you wanted to. And this belt I got from Zara I believe. Yeah this is from Zara. You may not necessarily need the bracelets but you know something like this you can do or you can wear a bigger belt if you wanted to. So it's a couple of things you can do with a long black leather skirt. So that's pretty much it guys. And again if you wanted you could also wear a hat with it. So let's take this belt off because that'll be a bit much. And let's throw the hat back on. So if you want it you can also do this. And I think this is pretty cute and simple too. So that's it guys. If you like videos like this please comment below that you want to see more videos like this more holes and stuff and more just how to style certain things for tall women or anybody. But I am tall so I kind of geared towards that because it is a little bit more difficult for us to actually find stuff. So if you stay to the end of this video please come and Coco we see you and guys don't forget to hit that subscribe button and notification bell. I do post videos on Wednesdays and Sundays. I'm trying to stay consistent. So Coco we see you and I will see you guys in the next one. Bye.