This is a formation that we're in a lot. Okay, so obviously two tight ends, two receivers. Derek back behind the quarterback. Do a lot of different things out of this. We can run our power scheme. We can run our zone scheme, play action pass, keeper game, but what you're gonna see here is we're gonna work Derek through and then back here to the weak side trying to sell a couple double teams here and here as we work back, fanning, and then let him up the field. You're gonna see the normal play action pass route that we would normally throw, deep shot, whatever it may be, but then mirroring it with a screen. Great way to get Derek to football off of something that we normally do. So let's see how this works and you'll see it from the end zone. So here, as we start to play, you can kind of see here, there's the double team. So you get run action, you get the linebacker to run through and then Derek's able to slip out with a lot of space back in here. So you see the receiver selling it. Brew just has to get up to the one week safety and you'll see him able to slip out from blocking the nose guard. That's what 21 miles an hour looks like. Okay, that's what 21 miles an hour looks like. That however, coach Mike is not 21 miles an hour. You're moving good though, coach. No, not good enough. So let's take a look at it from the end zone because this is how we have to be able to marry plays and be able to get things understood where we're able to sell these things with Derek here and then back out. But this is the guy right here that we got to get and you can see how Brew, like you said, uses his athleticism to get out in space. Everybody sells it. Peter loses inside and now we're able to get Derek in a whole bunch of space right there. Lyman not down the field illegally. But Peter's supposed to lose inside. That's what you're talking about. When we would throw a pass, we want to talk about inside out, but we're trying to create this space over here for Derek. So Peter kind of sells it and then loses back inside and is still able to kind of get up here and get a hand on Saunders. All 11 men do the job to make that work. Well, certainly. Well, those are the plays that we need to get to Derek and be able to sell and marry that off of formations that we are normally doing a lot of different things out of.


chocolate, beauty, or the beast, or both. Although cocoa itself is frequently found in foods like chocolate, which can contain high levels of fat and sugar, the cocoa powder itself may have beneficial effects in a number of chronic disease conditions, including heart disease. Flow-mediated dilation, mentioned in the main artery of the arm, which is about the same caliber as our coronary arteries, is considered one of the best measures of arterial function, a predictor of cardiovascular mortality. A little bit of cocoa doesn't do anything, but a little more or a lot more gives one a significant boost in arterial function within hours of consumption. How much does it take? Not much, just a teaspoon of a natural cocoa powder, which would be like a tablespoon or more of Dutch cocoa. Now it makes you a little suspicious that the author works in Hershey, Pennsylvania, at the Hershey Medical Center, and indeed has accepted money from our largest chocolate manufacturer's center for health and nutrition, conveniently located in the intersection of chocolate and cocoa avenues. Putting together all the best available science, though dozens of randomized controlled trials, arterial function was significantly improved within hours and after weeks and months of chronic cocoa consumption. It's always difficult to tease out a fact from fiction when such powerful financial interests are involved. Many of these studies were funded by industry as well, and as in all areas of research, evidence suggests that industry funding is associated with pro-industry conclusions. But even after removing those studies funded by industry, they found the same protective effect. The reason they measure arterial function in the arm, rather than where you really need it, the coronary arteries of the heart, is that that would require an angiogram, which is a little more invasive. But if you're able to find people already scheduled for an angiogram anyway, here we go. Double-blonde randomized trial finds that dark chocolate actually opens up coronary arteries themselves. And when they did what's called a cold presser test, where they plunge your hand into a bucket of ice water, which normally causes your arteries to constrict, but after dark chocolate they dilate it. Dark chocolate may also improve blood flow to the heart of our kidneys.  Furthermore, most chocolate products are manufactured with milk, a compound known to influence antioxidant capacity in our blood. Even if milk chocolate had the same flavonoid phytonutrient content as dark chocolate, the antioxidant effect of cocoa was potentially weakened in the blood when milk is consumed. So not only are there triple the antioxidants in dark compared to milk chocolate, but the milk actively works against the effects in the human body. So eat dark chocolate and get a nice spike in the antioxidant power of our bloodstream within an hour. Milk chocolate? Nothing. And if you eat that same dark chocolate with a cup of milk, the benefit is suppressed. The addition of milk, even in either in our stomach or in the chocolate itself, inhibits the within-body antioxidant activity of chocolate in the absorption into the bloodstream of one of the target phytonutrients. Sugar isn't good for us either. Sugar impairs arterial function. One bottle of soda's worth of sugar can temporarily cripple artery function. That's why sugar-free cocoa improves arterial function better than the same amount of cocoa with sugar added. So eliminating sugar appears to amplify the beneficial effects of cocoa. Bottom line, although the positive effects of chocolate and cocoa products seem apparent, precautions exist when we're talking about the calories, fat, and sugar in chocolate. Cocoa powder then offers the best of both worlds.  And you can make them tasty, as I note in my healthy chocolate milkshake recipe and my healthy chocolate ice cream video.


Bismillahirrahmanirrahim. Assalamu alaikum. Today we are going to talk about listening skills. Listening is the ability to pay attention to and effectively interpret what other people are saying. It is not just hearing the words that are being said to you rather than give comprehending the meaning and their context and trying to understand the underlying intentions and emotions. So, we can see that listening is an act that involves complex, cognitive, effective and behavioral processes. Cognitive process is like understanding and interpreting the message. Effective process is like being motivated to pay attention and the behavioral process is like providing a feedback either through verbal or non-verbal channel. Now, we are going to see that there is a basic communication profile as we all know that there are four language skills, listening, speaking, reading and writing. In order to learn these skills, listening comes at first and similar is the case that we use this skill most of the time, but if we can see that the time we spend on teaching these skills, we spend more time on teaching writing as comparative to listening. Now we are going to see stages of listening process. There are six stages of listening process. The first one is hearing and receiving. At this stage, the listener receives the message and acknowledges it. Then comes the second stage which is decoding the message. At this stage, listeners dissects the message and give meaning to the sounds according to his perceptions, beliefs and views. Then comes the third stage which is comprehension. At this stage, what listeners do is that they understand the meaning of the message. The fourth stage is remembering. Even before acting out on the information, we need to process the information. It is like recalling and retaining the information into the memory. Then comes the fifth stage which is evaluation. Once the message is being stored in the memory, the listener is going to evaluate the message which means he is going to assess and judge by applying critical thinking skills. The last stage is responding. At this stage, the listener needs to respond. If you are in a one-on-one conversation or a communication like in a group talk or in a dialogue, you can respond through verbal channel.  There are few misconceptions about listening. The first one is that people normally believe that listening and hearing are same things. But they are not. These are two different things because listening is an active process in which a listener is actively involved. He receives the message, he understands it, he evaluates it and then responds. But on the other hand, hearing is just like receiving the information and not retaining it and not providing a feedback on it. Other than this, there is also one misconception that we believe that all good speakers are good listeners as well. Which is not true because we also know that in order to become a good speaker, you have to be a good listener. But it is not the case that all good speakers are good listeners. And there is another misconception that smarter and intelligent people are good listeners. There are some problems that can occur during the listening process. Sometimes we are more concerned about what we are going to say rather than paying attention to what is being said to us. And sometimes we are more concerned about the part of information that is more related to us. So we skip the information that is not much relevant. And sometimes we are attention deficient, which means we are not paying attention. We are preoccupied or our mind is diverted. So we are not listening properly and not getting the message. Now we will see that there are various listening types. The first one is informative listening. The goal of this type of listening is to comprehend and retain the information. Then comes the second type which is active listening, which is the most important type of listening. Because in this type of listening, listener is actively involved. And it is also known as critical listening because a listener has to critically evaluate the message on multiple levels. Then comes the third type which is content listening. In this type of listening, we try to understand and evaluate the meaning of the message. Then we have empathetic listening. The goal of this type of listening is to understand the feelings and the views of the speaker. Then we have discriminative listening in which the listener is more concerned about specific sound and nuances rather than paying attention to the meaning of the words. And at the last we have appreciative listening in which listener seeks to appreciate the message which is more relevant and more concerned to his needs and wants. Okay, there are six listening skills that a listener needs to pay attention to. The first thing is that as a listener, what you need to do is to pay attention to what is being said to you and you try to avoid judgments. And after this, once you receive the message, try to reflect upon it, try to understand the meaning. And if there is some misconception and if there is some unclearity, it is better to clarify it by asking questions. Once you have all the message received, try to summarize it, try to get the main idea. And once the message is received, try to share it further. Now, we are going to see that there are various barriers to listening. Barriers are like hindrances that can affect the listening process. The first one is environmental barrier. In this kind of a barrier, what we can say is that sometimes technical faults can happen. Maybe the mic is not working properly. Maybe you are sitting far away from the stage or the people who are sitting around you, they are talking so much or they are background noises. So all these factors can affect the listening process. Apart from environmental barriers, we have psychological barriers and it is at the end of the listener. Sometimes listener is feeling anxious or stressful or there is something that is going on in his mind. So they are not in the right state of mind and they do not pay attention to what is being said. And there are physiological barriers that again comes at the end of a listener. Maybe you are not physically feeling well, there is headache. So you are not in that physically capable to understand what the message is about. Apart from these, we also have other barriers like selective listening, negative attitude or poor motivation. Selective listening is that in which the listener is more concerned about listening the content that is more relevant to them and they are paying attention to only that information which is related to them. Then comes the negative attitude in which we are more concerned about hearing what is not being said and poor motivation is that listener is not motivated enough to pay attention. And in this in this barrier what happens that the message is being lost. There are few steps that you can do in order to avoid all these barriers. The first one is try to control if it is an environmental barrier, you can control it by reducing the background noises and if you are a listener what you can do, you can practice to pay attention to listen properly rather than concentrating on what you are going to say. You can ask questions if there is some unclarity or ambiguity. Other than this what else you can do is try to pay attention to what the speaker is saying, try to avoid selective listening, try to avoid judgments and you need to be more focused in order to understand the message. So in order to conclude this topic I will give you some properties of a good listener. The first thing the characteristic of a good listener is that they are always active. They are actively participating in the process, they pay attention, they are more focused and they pay attention to what the speaker is saying and they are always keen to learn and other than this they always give you nonverbal cues like nodding their head, keeping eye contact. Apart from this if they have any questions they save it till the end and they are more focused on speaker's message and they are always keen to learn.


Now is the winter of our discontent, made glorious summer by the sun of York. And this, of course, is from William Shakespeare's play Richard the Third. The play opened at the Globe Theatre in 1592, a little over 100 years after the real Richard the Third's death. By today's standards, this play could be seen as propaganda, or as we say now, fake news. The play paints Richard the Third as this hunchbacked, deformed, evil, evil king who most likely murdered his two nephews in order to secure the crown for himself. But now historians are not so sure that was what Richard was like. They're also not 100% sure that King Richard the Third had anything to do with the death of his nephews. But before we go any further, you know what to do. Please hit that subscribe button and give us a like. Also, again, a very, very special thank you to all of our patrons. We're getting new patrons by the day and I could not be more grateful and more appreciative of all you guys that help support this channel. And as always, a very special thank you to our producer, Tiffany Monroe, who is a Reiki master here in Atlanta, Georgia. Her contact information is in the description box below. And I do also want to wish Tiffany a very happy birthday. Her birthday was on Saturday and I hope that she enjoyed her day. If you know Tiffany, go ahead and send her some birthday love. All right, let's get started. Welcome to El Soteric Atlanta. My name is Bryce and today on Mystery Monday, we're going to be talking about the princes in the tower. A couple of weeks ago, we did a Mystery Monday regarding the disappearance of one of King Richard the Third's closest allies and friends. I will put a link to that video in the description box below. Because we went into some detail over the War of the Roses in that video, I'm not going to go through that all over again today. But again, if you do need a refresher on what led up to King Richard the Third and his missing nephews, you might want to go back and rewatch that video first. For today's story, we're going to start with the marriage of King Edward the Fourth, Richard the Third's brother, to a commoner named Elizabeth Woodville. If you remember from our last video, Warwick was one of King Edward the Fourth's strongest allies. He went to battle with King Edward the Yorkist against the Lancasters to put Edward on the throne. Now, we know that throughout history, most marriages within a royal family are done for political power and treaties with other world empires. And we do know that Warwick had been given the nickname the Kingmaker, because he was really good at helping people organize their power and maintain power. Now, after Edward's father and older brother had been killed in a battle previous against the Lancasters, Warwick took over guardianship of George and Richard, Edward's brothers. So these two boys were living in the north of England with Warwick's family. They were learning all the politics, all the rules of war, everything they needed to know to be in a ruling class family. Meanwhile, Warwick was trying to find a suitable wife for King Edward the Fourth. He was working out a treaty with France in order for Edward to marry a French princess when Edward fell in love with a commoner named Elizabeth Woodville. Not only was she a commoner, but she had been married before she was widowed and she had children from her previous marriage. At this time, this was super taboo for the royalty. And not to mention her late husband was a supporter of the Lancasterian dynasty, not the Yorkist. And Edward the Fourth was a Yorkist. Now, at least we all forget the Lancasters in the Yorks all come from King Edward the Third. So they're all cousins. It's the same freaking family. But nonetheless, Edward and Elizabeth fell in love and they got married in secret.  How dare he marry this commoner who is a widow and has like a stain on her character because her late husband was supporter of the Lancasterian. Well, Warwick then withdrew his support from Edward the Fourth. As you might remember from our last video over the War of the Roses, this is when Warwick went to France and tried to strike up an alliance with Margaret Anjou, who was his like sworn enemy and enemy of the people of England during the Wars of the Roses. Remember Margaret Anjou was married to King Henry the Sixth, who was sitting on the throne when he got kicked off the throne by King Edward the Fourth. Again, they're cousins. It's the same bloodline. I mean, it's the same family. So for the commoners, I don't know how much this really mattered. This was really just a family feud at the end of the day. So anyway, when Warwick got mad at Edward for marrying a commoner and he turned his back on Edward and started to fight against Edward, he was going to take Edward off the throne. Edward's brother George decided to stay with Warwick and support Warwick, whereas Richard the Third, or Richard then, went and supported his brother Edward. Eventually, Warwick was killed in a battle and King Henry the Sixth was placed in the Tower of London. We know that King Henry the Sixth was eventually killed in the Tower of London, as many people have been killed before in the Tower of London, and it is believed that it was Richard the Third on his brother's command that went and killed Henry the Sixth. Just take him out so there would be no other contention or rivalry for the throne. In 1483, 400 years before I was born, and this is my family that I'm talking about, so that's kind of weird, King Edward the Fourth just died. He died unexpectedly. Now King Edward the Fourth and Elizabeth Woodville were extremely fertile. They had a lot of children. Two of those children were boys. One's name was Edward, the oldest boy, and the other's name was Richard. They weren't the oldest children, but they were the oldest boys. At the time of King Edward the Fourth's death, his oldest son Edward was not old enough to reign over England. He was only 12 years old, and his younger brother Richard was only 10. When this happens a lot in our history, we've seen this happen a lot where the king will die and his son or his heir is still considered too young even for those times to be in charge of a whole government system. In their will, even though the son, the young son, will be considered the king, they'll have a region around them, people that will help them rule the country and train them until they become 18 years old, and they can take the reins for themselves. Well, in King Edward the Fourth's will, it stated that if he were to die before his son Edward was old enough to rule England, then King Edward the Fourth's brother would help Edward be his regime, really help guide him until he turned 18. I know this gets really confusing with names because it's King Edward the Fourth and his brother King Richard the Third, and then we have Edward's children who were also Edward and Richard as well. People just weren't very creative back then. Everybody had the same name. Now, this is all well and good in under normal circumstances. The only problem we have here is Edward the Fourth's wife, Elizabeth Woodville. Again, she was the Queen of England until Edward died because she was a commoner. She now becomes the Queen Mother and not the Queen anymore. She loses a lot of her power because her power only was within her husband. And Elizabeth Woodville was smart. She understood that she was not liked by the landcastry inside. She understood that her life was now probably in danger and her children's life was also probably in danger because through her children, that's where the royal bloodline lived. So Elizabeth Woodville, being savvy and smart, went ahead and arranged for her son Edward to be coronated on May the Fourth of 1483. Meanwhile, Elizabeth Woodville took the rest of her children, including her younger son, Richard, to Westminster Abbey where they would be considered safe. Remember in this times, a lot of times, Abbey's and monasteries were like home base. You can't mess with somebody if they're living within a monastery or an Abbey. It was considered a religious place. So she's now in hiding waiting for her older son to be his coronation. So now she has a little bit more power and more safety because even though Edward, her son Edward, wasn't technically old enough to rule, he would still be considered king. So he was not going to let anything happen to his mama or his siblings, right? At this time, Edward, the son Edward, who would become Edward the Fifth, the 12 year old, was with his mother's brother at their estate outside of London. Once they got word that a coronation had been scheduled for May Fourth, Elizabeth Woodville's brother took Edward into London on the way there, Richard, Edward's brother, his other uncle. So Edward, the 12 year old Edward is traveling with his maternal uncle, but then he sees his like paternal uncle coming down on horseback to get Edward the 12 year old. This would not have been super weird because we do know that by Edward the Fourth's will, he wanted his brother Richard to help his son Edward. And so Edward the Fifth, the 12 year old was handed over to his uncle Richard. Soon after that, some of Richard's people went to Elizabeth Woodville at Westminster Abbey and convinced her that her other son, another Richard named, who's 10, he's named after his uncle, but that they needed to take him to the Tower of London as well for their safekeeping. Now the Tower of London wasn't just a place of executions as we know it today. The Tower of London also had apartments in there.  And so they convinced Elizabeth Woodville that she needed to give her youngest son over to Richard's people so that the youngest son, Richard, the 10 year old, could witness his brother Edward be coronated as King Edward the Fifth. We also have to remember that Elizabeth Woodville and Edward again had many children. Most of them were girls. Edward and Richard were the only two boys. Now, and this time in England, it was the male air that inherited the throne. That is why it was important to have an heir and a spare. You had not just one son, but you pushed for two. Because if the first son died, you needed to make sure that your line stayed on the throne. So therefore you needed to have a second son. At this point, if Edward the Fourth had not had any sons and died, it would have gone to his brother Richard and not any of Edward's daughters. So that was another con to get Elizabeth Woodville to hand over her youngest son. They needed to be protected. Because if anything happened to the 12 year old Edward, the crown would then be passed to his younger brother Richard. This is why I believe Elizabeth Woodville agreed to hand over her 10 year old little boy. It was to protect the throne for her children. Now, a funny thing happened the day before Edward was supposed to be coronated as King Edward the Fifth. A preacher got up and started preaching that both Edward and Richard Edward the Fourth and Elizabeth Woodville's little boys were illegitimate. Were they illegitimate? Not by our standards. Their parents were married when they were born. Again, they weren't even the oldest children. So their parents had been married for a while by the time these two little boys were born. The reason why they were considered illegitimate was because Elizabeth Woodville had been married before and was a widow. Times were very literal back then. And because she already had had a family, this was like a legal loophole. It meant that none of her children then were legalized human beings because you can't then marry again. It's just crazy legal mumbo jumbo, but they were married. So this is just another tactic in this War of the Roses that was still going on at this point. So in one day, one singular day, King Edward the Fourth and Elizabeth Woodville's little boys, Edward the Fifth and Richard, 12 and 10, went from being the heir apparent to the throne to having all of their titles stripped from them and being labeled bastards. This meant that there was no king or queen of England. So if these little boys are not heir to the throne, again, it's now going to go to Edward's brother, Richard the Third. The Tower of London, which was originally there to protect these little boys, turned into their prison.   They were inside the Tower of London playing outside. They were playing with their bows and arrows as little boys would do totally innocent, totally oblivious to the outside world and the fate that awaited them. Richard and his wife and Neville were coronated on July the 6th of 1483. Now Richard was married to Warwick's daughter, even though Richard chose his brother as in the battle between Warwick and Edward the Fourth. Richard did take his brother side, but he was, however, married to Warwick's daughter. Immediately people in London started to get suspicious. Where were these little princesses? Where did they go? And so they started to question Richard the Third, but he would not answer any of their questions like no comment, like we would say today in the press. Now the interesting thing is that we know they disappeared. We know that they were gone. If the little Edward and Richard, the 12 and the 10 year old, were illegal and therefore were not eligible to inherit the throne, if that were true, then why did they feel the need to get rid of them? Now Richard the Third ruled England for about two years, one of the shortest monarchs to ever sit on the throne. He did have one son with his wife and Neville, but his son also passed away young, leaving no heirs. Now in 1485, Henry Tudor came over and challenged King Richard the Third at the Battle of Bosworth. Henry Tudor killed Richard the Third, taking the crown for himself and starting the Tudor dynasty. Now King Henry the Seventh at this point, he became coordinated as King Henry the Seventh married Elizabeth of York. Elizabeth of York is the sister of the two little princesses that went missing from the tower. She was the oldest child of Edward the Fourth and Elizabeth Woodville. So therefore she was also the niece of King Richard the Third. Now there is a little side story with Elizabeth of York and King Richard the Third, even though that was her paternal uncle. We know these royal people are very incestual. There is a belief that after Anne Neville passed away, Richard the Third was like courting Elizabeth of York, his niece, and there was a bit of a love affair happening, which is really freaking gross. I, gross, like that's disgusting, that's your father's brother. But anyway, Elizabeth of York was then married off to King Henry the Seventh to join the Lancastrian house and the Tudor house together to create the Tudor Rose to then end the War of the Roses. Regarding the princess and the tower and what happened to them, the biggest suspect has always been King Richard the Third. He had the most to gain for those little boys going missing, although there are other theories as well. Richard the Third as a suspect gained a lot of popularity in Shakespeare's play. Again, that was written in 1592. However, we accept now that that play was propaganda. For example, we know that Richard the Third was not deformed. He did not have a hunchback. Richard the Third was very well equipped as a soldier. If he had any deformities like that, he would not have been registered in all these battles that we know he fought in. We also know that for the two years that Richard sat on the throne, he was a pretty good king. He was a pretty righteous king. He followed the law pretty well for the people. So why would the Shakespeare play make him out to be what he wasn't? Well, that's really easy. The monarch on the throne when the Shakespearean play was written was Queen Elizabeth the First. Queen Elizabeth the First was the granddaughter of King Henry the Seventh and Elizabeth of York was her grandmother. King Henry the Seventh's reign started off very shaky because Henry Tudor did not have quite such a claim to the throne as maybe other people did. In fact, Mary Elizabeth of York was a big political move because she was the daughter of King Edward the Fourth, which then gave her children way more credibility through her bloodline. With the propaganda from Shakespeare and also from Sir Thomas Moore about Edward the Third was done intentionally because King Henry the Seventh, Queen Elizabeth the First's grandfather, is also a suspect when it comes to the disappearance of the two little boys in the tower. There is another theory that places King Richard the Third as the boy's ultimate protector. There is a theory that he knew these boys were going to be attacked and so he had them hidden away from the public and then when he was killed by Henry Tudor, Henry Tudor might have been the one to go in and have the little boys murdered because if they weren't illegitimate and Henry Tudor was on the throne and then they popped up alive, well then the crown would have been taken from Henry Tudor and given to Edward the Fourth's sons and it's not like they could just promise to stay in hiding because these little boys if they had had sons could then come and challenge any of Henry Tudor's heirs which would have been his son King Henry the Eighth and his daughter Queen Elizabeth the First. So Shakespeare and Sir Thomas Moore had to participate in propaganda or fake news in order to convince not only the people that Richard the Third killed these princes but that they had been killed so therefore there was no competition for the Tudor dynasty which leads us to our third theory which we're going to dive into more next week is that the boys were freed from the tower and lived. There were some people who came up who claimed to be these boys and tried to challenge Henry the Tudor for his throne. Obviously we know from history it didn't work but were they really the little boys? Had the little boys been sent into exile to protect themselves? Now in 1674 two little children's skeletons were found under a staircase at the tower of London. It was immediately assumed that it was the skeletal remains of the little boys, the two princes. Of course in 1674 they did not have the technology that we have today to determine through DNA that they were or were not the two princes. Remember a lot of people died at that tower and in the 1600s they did bury the two skeletons at Westminster Abbey carrying the name of Prince Edward the Fifth and Little Prince Richard. However there was still a big question mark on whether that was them or not and so in 1933 the bones were exhumed. They did test the bones they could tell the ages the ages were the ages of the little boys when they disappeared and they also found something on one of their skulls, something that happened to the skull which would indicate that the little boys had been smothered to death and that's how they were killed which would make sense that's probably the easiest way to murder a child. However a lot of historians and scientists today are not so sure that this was the boys still they think that the team that examined these boys in 1933 were biased and wanted it to be the little boys and so therefore that clouded their judgment and their research for example the team in 1933 didn't even think to check the gender. It could have been two little girls that they were examining and not little boys. Historians and forensic scientists have asked Westminster Abbey recently if they could reexume the bones to recheck them and unfortunately Westminster Abbey has declined so it's still going to stay a big old mystery as to what happened to the little boys. Now in 1996 something really interesting happened. A law school in Indiana decided that they were going to put King Richard III on trial for the murder of his nephews. Now a three judge panel heard the trial and found King Richard III innocent. There was reasonable doubts they couldn't say for sure whether he had anything to do with his nephew's murder or not. So I guess legally in the United States Richard III is innocent of his charges although they did say the same thing about O.J. Simpson too so there you go. So what do you think what do you think happened to the princes in the tower? What do you think about Richard III or do you think it was Henry Tudor? What do you think happened to those baby boys? I hope you guys are having a wonderful day. Get your popcorn because life is super exciting right now. I'll be back on David Zublick's channel tomorrow to be going over the Gospel of Truth which I'll give a recap on Wednesday of this week. I've got some exciting things in store for this channel. We have some interviews coming up and I'm super excited about the future and going forward. If you would like to purchase our opening song there is a link in the description box below. Thank you again to Josh McKay for doing our music and thank you to Todd Roderick for helping me get this video up and on the internet for all of you. All right be safe out there and have a wonderful day. I'll talk to you soon. Bye.


We can have maybe rows of five, if you don't mind, locking arms to demonstrate that unity. And I don't want us to do chance. I want you to get to know the people that you're walking with. So if you could form a line with maybe somebody that you've never met before, that would be fantastic. And then the chief is gonna give us some details on how we're doing our walk with traffic and everything. Right? Okay, we're gonna walk in the street. We don't want anybody to get hurt. So we have some officers that are gonna block off the traffic for us, but it's only gonna be one way. So we wanna stay on the right side of the center line, okay? So the other lane can keep going. So stay away from the center line, stay over, and we'll be fine. We're gonna go up A Street near to Michigan, east on Michigan to seven, to six. To six, then endowed six streets to the courthouse. We're gonna have some short words there. Then when we get done, we're gonna go back south on Sixth Street to Pennsylvania and go west on Penn to Ninth Street here, and then we'll bring Ninth Street back, okay? Thanks, everybody, for coming. Keep it in there, y'all. All right, man. I've probably spent it like a month and a half. Is it really? Yeah. It's been good. It's been good, man. A lot of work ahead of us. Here you go, go ahead. Thank you, man. I think it's fantastic that all of you will come out and show your support. To me, it's a beautiful sight to see so many different people of different ethnicities, and I believe this is how it's supposed to be. Instead of focusing on what divides us, let's come together and focus on what unites us. And we're doing this in front of the courthouse as a symbol of justice, but also righteousness, and that's where this is supposed to happen. And we're gonna get started. All of us are gonna make it brief because I believe actions speak just as loud as words. So first we have our city administrator Todd Wolfe coming up with the message. Please give a round of applause. Thank you, everybody. This is a great time. Thank you. Thank you, everybody, for coming. Mike van der Steen wasn't able to make it, but he did ask me to present a little bit of a few words from him, so I'll read what he provided me. We thank Michael Thomas and the Black American Community Outreach members for organizing the Community Unity March today. This event allows the City of Sheboygan to express our concern about the distressing events that continue to occur around the United States and here in Wisconsin. I'm saddened, we are saddened, by the recent events in Kenosha and seek to understand the actions of the officers involved. As a community, Sheboygan continues to express work on diversity and inclusion and seek a community where all residents and neighbors are treated with dignity and respect. We hear you and want you to know that we are committed to building relationships to earn your trust. We must continue to eliminate racial disparity and support efforts to increase diversity and promote racial equality in Sheboygan. Thank you for your participation today in the March. And that was Mike van der Steen and myself. Thank you. That was a beautiful message and now we have a word from our very own police chief, Chris Damagowski. Yeah, so unfortunately nothing rehearsed but really what I really want to say is, first of all, thanks for everybody that came out. We really appreciate everybody taking the time out of their lives to come together and show the importance of us being unified in the community. It should be obvious to everybody that we still have, we've made a lot of progress, but we still have a lot, a lot of work to do. In order to accomplish that, we need to work together to get it done. One of the things that's important is that we listen to each other. So be civil to each other. Take the time not only to talk and to share our message, but to listen to what everybody else has to say and figure out what we can agree on rather than focusing on what we don't agree on and form goals and move together from there. So I just really want to thank Mike, Black Americans for Community Outreach, Corey, Deontay, everybody who's taken the time to meet with us, tell us some of their concerns, tell us how they believe that we can move forward and tell us how we can support them and assist them in doing that. And so I really look forward to all the things that we have planned so far. But more importantly, I really look forward to the leadership that they've stepped up and started to show and look forward to seeing that grow and really take off in this community because I think it's really needed and it's really the way to move forward. So thank you, everybody. Thank you, Sheriff. I want to thank the police department. I want to thank the sheriff's department, the city and all of you who have come out here and shown your support. You know, as a pastor, I can speak and preach all day, but I decided that I was only going to give two minutes. And so I did write something out, and if you would bear with me as I try to say it all. As I was preparing for this event, there was backlash that was brought to my attention. There were complaints that we might be walking in the streets and making it inconvenient for people. There was complaints that this might be just another Black Lives Matter movement. There was complaints that we would be walking with police officers who brutalize us and city people who just oppress us. And these different types of narratives are the things that we need to change and really only speak as to why this walk for unity is needed. With so much unrest that's going on right now, it's clear that there are issues that need to be addressed and corrected. Besides all the horrific things that have happened and are well-documented throughout the many years of our country and the recent events that we've witnessed from Jacob Blake and Breonna Taylor just to name a few, the Black American community outreach is still dedicated to our mission. And that mission is to uplift and empower the entire community in which we live, the entire community in which we live. We are committed to it. In partnership with the city and the police department, we look to build bridges and not walls. And we're calling on you to build these bridges with us. Bridges that put an end to systemic racism. Bridges that put an end to injustice. Bridges that lead to equitable community and bridges that lead to diversity inclusion. The time is now. It's more urgent than ever. We ask that you would join us in partnership with the police department, the city government and administration. We've already begun talks for diversity and education and intentional workforce inclusion, as well as pop-up barbecues coming to a park near you and so much more. It's important that we work together, not just for the city of Sheboygan, but to be an example for communities all over the place. I'd like to leave you with a Bible scripture. You know I had to. Mark chapter 3 verse 24, if a kingdom is divided against itself, that kingdom cannot stand. We must come together and be united. Join us please. If you don't mind, I'd like to say a quick prayer and then we'll continue on with our walk. Please join me. Dear Heavenly Father, I thank you so much for every soul that has decided to participate today. Lord God, I pray that you would just bless them in a mighty way, Lord, in a way that is completely obvious, that it is your hand over their life. And God, I just pray that you will continue to keep us united. God, I pray that this would just be the beginning, Lord, that we will continue to bring people in and that they would look to be a bridge and a helper of their fellow man. Lord God, we thank you so much for all that you are doing and continuing to do. We love you and we pray this in Jesus' name. Amen.


I'm here from launch systems that want to talk about solving a problem a lot of people seem to run into When they are self hosting servers and what happens in PF sense is you build a server internally in your network And then you go through then set up a let's encrypt for example Certificate and a fully qualified domain name and you get it facing the world So now you're hosting it except when you try to access it internally There's a couple different ways to do this one of them is setting up proper NAT reflection So that when you hit the public IP address internally it reflects back in and goes to the server Another way in the way I prefer to do it is through host overrides Couple prerequisites that you are using PF sense as your DNS server If you are using something like active directory You'll have to make those same DNS changes in active directory in the DNS server that you have active directory using the windows one Essentially, this is specifically for helping people who are using PF sense want to know how to do a host override So they're fully qualified domain works properly internally and externally now This does work with either a server that is independent that you built yourself Whether it be a single host or multi-host server or if you're using HA proxy Wherever that IP address is is where you'll have to point it to in a case of HA proxy on PF sense Which I've done videos on that would be the PF sense address in the example. We're going to use today It's a standalone server that we have now what we've actually done is take launch systems comm and tunnel it to be an internal server So bear with me here for this example, but essentially you'll see that we have an IP address of 192-168-3.9 internally And that IP address is going to represent Lawrence systems comm and yes, I actually have a tunnel So Lawrence systems comm does respond on that IP address when we're going to put the host override in and Before we get there though, I want to start with the DNS resolver documentation. There are many more features in DNS resolver Then we'll be covering today. We're specifically going to be talking about the host overrides, but yes There is a lot more you can do with it I will leave a link to the documentation which is really easy to find because you just go over here and Can click the little question mark would bring you the documentation. All right now the host override section right now is empty So before we do anything, let's look up where Lawrence systems comm lives Dig 192-168-88.1 That's the IP address we have here for our PF sense. We're behind it with this laptop that I'm on So Lawrence systems comm dig and it resolves to the proper public IP address And if we are not inside this network, that would be great But as I said for this demonstration, we're assuming Lawrence systems comm actually lives internally at <IP_ADDRESS>. So when we do The dig our goal is to resolve it to that address and now let's cover something really quick This is open SSL and this is where some of the trouble sometimes come in once you're dealing with certificates certificates have to have the name the server name sent by your browser matching The certificate that responds it actually isn't tied to IP address. It specifically is tied to the server name sent and the certificate offered This is actually how it works as well when you have a website serving up multiple Different websites on one single IP address. It uses the server name to determine what Site you're going to get or what certificate you're going to get and hopefully you are using a certificate and everything should be done securely It's a little bit simpler. Obviously if you're not same rules apply for the host override But you don't have to worry about the TLS part of it, but we're gonna do here is open SSL client We're sending the server name or systems.com to host <IP_ADDRESS> 443 and this is just an example to show you that it pulls the right certificate So we go here and it does return CN Equals or systems calm and there's our let's encrypt CN equals three now Just so you know if we put something different and we'll put like not Or systems calm it will not return the proper name this is what happens essentially when you go to the website and Put in something like a we'll open up Firefox for this because that way nothing's cached HTTPS <IP_ADDRESS> and we get a certificate error Because it's not sending a certificate that matches the server name server name We sent was <IP_ADDRESS> and it's not the expected Certificate so we end up with a certificate mismatch and that error that people are used to seeing let's go ahead and Create an entry so the host we leave blank domain is Lawrence systems.com IP address <IP_ADDRESS> description LTS host Override And then we also want to go ahead and we're gonna do WWW as well and hit save and Then apply so now Lawrence systems.com equals <IP_ADDRESS> And WWW Lawrence six systems.com is <IP_ADDRESS> Let's go ahead and test so we go here and we do the dig at <IP_ADDRESS> Which is our local IP address of PF sense. Hey, look at responds with that put a WWW in front of it Also responds like that. What if we did an external address? <IP_ADDRESS> So if we hit quad 9 it gives the proper answer of 143.198 etc. So now if you're outside of your own network and not using PF sense for DNS resolution, no problem It's gonna resolve properly But internally it's going to override and put you at the local servers address, which is that 3.9 So let's actually go there now I do a refresh and then open up the web console down here and you can see the remote IP where There's a lot going on here. So my website has a lot of things on it But you see where Lawrence systems.com is being served from <IP_ADDRESS> down here at the bottom and That's it now I did have to pause a minute and Refresh a couple times because it takes a little while because Firefox wanted to cache the old IP address You may run into that you may have to reboot some hosts someone will hold on to despite PF sense having a new DNS entry if they've looked the site up before you may not see it immediately That's one of the reasons I was looking to see which remote IP it was pulling up down here to make sure it was pulling up The right one and that the demo was working as expected it's really that simple to do these host overrides and Override any site that you want to equal that now I mentioned multi-site hosting and for example if you had a server that supplies multiple sites based on the server name You could use the same IP address for return with different domain entries. So Lawrence systems.com Resolves as <IP_ADDRESS>, but you could also have some other website.com resolve is that as well So it's just as many host entries as you want and of course you can add extra Aliases underneath in case you have some other ones that also resolve there because well It works the same way with subdomains as well Generally speaking you just need the two for a fully qualified domain name And yes, this will work if you have like my domain dot Dynamic DNS or whatever you may be using if you're not using a fully qualified domain name that you own But something like a dynamic DNS type of service. It does work with that as well I'll leave a link over to the documentation from pfSense on this It's a really simple thing to do but it will solve you a lot of headache just to throw that host override in there and Override it so it points at the local server as opposed to the public one And this will solve all those little bugs that seem to come up And this is a popular topic in my forum in a popular support topic that just comes up in general. I find alright Thanks And thank you for making it to the end of this video if you enjoyed this content Please give it a thumbs up if you like to see more content from this channel Hit the subscribe button and the bell icon to hire a sure project head over to Lawrence systems.com and click on the Hire us button right at the top to help this channel out in other ways There's a join button here for YouTube and a patreon page where your support is greatly appreciated For deals discounts and offers check out our affiliate links in the descriptions of all of our videos including a link to our shirt store We have a wide variety of shirts and new designs come out. Well randomly. So check back frequently And finally our forums forums that Lawrence systems commas where you can have a more in-depth discussion about this video and other Tech topics covered on this channel Thank you again, and we look forward to hearing from you in the meantime check out some of our other videos